Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
| (fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 236 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Functions defined piecewise on a finset
This file defines `Finset.piecewise`: Given two functions `f`, `g`, `s.piecewise f g` is a function
which is equal to `f` on `s` and `g` on the complement.
## TODO
Should we deduplicate this from `Set.piecewise`?
-/
open Function
namespace Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Sort*} (s : Finset ι) (f g : ∀ i, π i)
/-- `s.piecewise f g` is the function equal to `f` on the finset `s`, and to `g` on its
complement. -/
def piecewise [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] : ∀ i, π i := fun i ↦ if i ∈ s then f i else g i
lemma piecewise_insert_self [DecidableEq ι] {j : ι} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g j = f j := by simp [piecewise]
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_empty [∀ i : ι, Decidable (i ∈ (∅ : Finset ι))] : piecewise ∅ f g = g := by
ext i
simp [piecewise]
variable [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)]
-- TODO: fix this in norm_cast
@[norm_cast move]
lemma piecewise_coe [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ (s : Set ι))] :
(s : Set ι).piecewise f g = s.piecewise f g := by
ext
congr
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_eq_of_mem {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : s.piecewise f g i = f i := by
simp [piecewise, hi]
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_eq_of_not_mem {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s) : s.piecewise f g i = g i := by
simp [piecewise, hi]
lemma piecewise_congr {f f' g g' : ∀ i, π i} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = f' i)
(hg : ∀ i ∉ s, g i = g' i) : s.piecewise f g = s.piecewise f' g' :=
funext fun i => if_ctx_congr Iff.rfl (hf i) (hg i)
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_insert_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ insert j s)]
(h : i ≠ j) : (insert j s).piecewise f g i = s.piecewise f g i := by simp [piecewise, h]
lemma piecewise_insert [DecidableEq ι] (j : ι) [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ insert j s)] :
(insert j s).piecewise f g = update (s.piecewise f g) j (f j) := by
classical simp only [← piecewise_coe, coe_insert, ← Set.piecewise_insert]
ext
congr
simp
lemma piecewise_cases {i} (p : π i → Prop) (hf : p (f i)) (hg : p (g i)) :
p (s.piecewise f g i) := by
by_cases hi : i ∈ s <;> simpa [hi]
lemma piecewise_singleton [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : piecewise {i} f g = update g i (f i) := by
rw [← insert_empty_eq, piecewise_insert, piecewise_empty]
lemma piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_left {s t : Finset ι} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)]
[∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] (h : s ⊆ t) (f₁ f₂ g : ∀ a, π a) :
s.piecewise (t.piecewise f₁ f₂) g = s.piecewise f₁ g :=
s.piecewise_congr (fun _i hi => piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ (h hi)) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_idem_left (f₁ f₂ g : ∀ a, π a) :
s.piecewise (s.piecewise f₁ f₂) g = s.piecewise f₁ g :=
piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_left (Subset.refl _) _ _ _
lemma piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_right {s t : Finset ι} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ s)]
[∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) (f g₁ g₂ : ∀ a, π a) :
s.piecewise f (t.piecewise g₁ g₂) = s.piecewise f g₂ :=
s.piecewise_congr (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _i hi => t.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ (mt (@h _) hi)
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_idem_right (f g₁ g₂ : ∀ a, π a) :
s.piecewise f (s.piecewise g₁ g₂) = s.piecewise f g₂ :=
piecewise_piecewise_of_subset_right (Subset.refl _) f g₁ g₂
lemma update_eq_piecewise {β : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (f : ι → β) (i : ι) (v : β) :
update f i v = piecewise (singleton i) (fun _ => v) f :=
(piecewise_singleton (fun _ => v) _ _).symm
lemma update_piecewise [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (v : π i) :
update (s.piecewise f g) i v = s.piecewise (update f i v) (update g i v) := by
ext j
rcases em (j = i) with (rfl | hj) <;> by_cases hs : j ∈ s <;> simp [*]
lemma update_piecewise_of_mem [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (v : π i) :
update (s.piecewise f g) i v = s.piecewise (update f i v) g := by
rw [update_piecewise]
refine s.piecewise_congr (fun _ _ => rfl) fun j hj => update_of_ne ?_ ..
exact fun h => hj (h.symm ▸ hi)
lemma update_piecewise_of_not_mem [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (hi : i ∉ s) (v : π i) :
update (s.piecewise f g) i v = s.piecewise f (update g i v) := by
rw [update_piecewise]
refine s.piecewise_congr (fun j hj => update_of_ne ?_ ..) fun _ _ => rfl
exact fun h => hi (h ▸ hj)
lemma piecewise_same : s.piecewise f f = f := by
ext i
by_cases h : i ∈ s <;> simp [h]
section Fintype
| variable [Fintype ι]
@[simp]
lemma piecewise_univ [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ (univ : Finset ι))] (f g : ∀ i, π i) :
univ.piecewise f g = f := by
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Piecewise.lean | 123 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
| @[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 111 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2.Init
/-!
# The symmetric square
This file defines the symmetric square, which is `α × α` modulo
swapping. This is also known as the type of unordered pairs.
More generally, the symmetric square is the second symmetric power
(see `Data.Sym.Basic`). The equivalence is `Sym2.equivSym`.
From the point of view that an unordered pair is equivalent to a
multiset of cardinality two (see `Sym2.equivMultiset`), there is a
`Mem` instance `Sym2.Mem`, which is a `Prop`-valued membership
test. Given `h : a ∈ z` for `z : Sym2 α`, then `Mem.other h` is the other
element of the pair, defined using `Classical.choice`. If `α` has
decidable equality, then `h.other'` computably gives the other element.
The universal property of `Sym2` is provided as `Sym2.lift`, which
states that functions from `Sym2 α` are equivalent to symmetric
two-argument functions from `α`.
Recall that an undirected graph (allowing self loops, but no multiple
edges) is equivalent to a symmetric relation on the vertex type `α`.
Given a symmetric relation on `α`, the corresponding edge set is
constructed by `Sym2.fromRel` which is a special case of `Sym2.lift`.
## Notation
The element `Sym2.mk (a, b)` can be written as `s(a, b)` for short.
## Tags
symmetric square, unordered pairs, symmetric powers
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Finset Function Sym
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Sym2
/-- This is the relation capturing the notion of pairs equivalent up to permutations. -/
@[aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2]) [safe [constructors, cases], norm]]
inductive Rel (α : Type u) : α × α → α × α → Prop
| refl (x y : α) : Rel _ (x, y) (x, y)
| swap (x y : α) : Rel _ (x, y) (y, x)
attribute [refl] Rel.refl
@[symm]
theorem Rel.symm {x y : α × α} : Rel α x y → Rel α y x := by aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
@[trans]
theorem Rel.trans {x y z : α × α} (a : Rel α x y) (b : Rel α y z) : Rel α x z := by
aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
theorem Rel.is_equivalence : Equivalence (Rel α) :=
{ refl := fun (x, y) ↦ Rel.refl x y, symm := Rel.symm, trans := Rel.trans }
/-- One can use `attribute [local instance] Sym2.Rel.setoid` to temporarily
make `Quotient` functionality work for `α × α`. -/
def Rel.setoid (α : Type u) : Setoid (α × α) :=
⟨Rel α, Rel.is_equivalence⟩
@[simp]
theorem rel_iff' {p q : α × α} : Rel α p q ↔ p = q ∨ p = q.swap := by
aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
theorem rel_iff {x y z w : α} : Rel α (x, y) (z, w) ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp
end Sym2
/-- `Sym2 α` is the symmetric square of `α`, which, in other words, is the
type of unordered pairs.
It is equivalent in a natural way to multisets of cardinality 2 (see
`Sym2.equivMultiset`).
-/
abbrev Sym2 (α : Type u) := Quot (Sym2.Rel α)
/-- Constructor for `Sym2`. This is the quotient map `α × α → Sym2 α`. -/
protected abbrev Sym2.mk {α : Type*} (p : α × α) : Sym2 α := Quot.mk (Sym2.Rel α) p
/-- `s(x, y)` is an unordered pair,
which is to say a pair modulo the action of the symmetric group.
It is equal to `Sym2.mk (x, y)`. -/
notation3 "s(" x ", " y ")" => Sym2.mk (x, y)
namespace Sym2
protected theorem sound {p p' : α × α} (h : Sym2.Rel α p p') : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk p' :=
Quot.sound h
protected theorem exact {p p' : α × α} (h : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk p') : Sym2.Rel α p p' :=
Quotient.exact (s := Sym2.Rel.setoid α) h
@[simp]
protected theorem eq {p p' : α × α} : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk p' ↔ Sym2.Rel α p p' :=
Quotient.eq' (s₁ := Sym2.Rel.setoid α)
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator, induction_eliminator]
protected theorem ind {f : Sym2 α → Prop} (h : ∀ x y, f s(x, y)) : ∀ i, f i :=
Quot.ind <| Prod.rec <| h
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn {f : Sym2 α → Prop} (i : Sym2 α) (hf : ∀ x y, f s(x, y)) : f i :=
i.ind hf
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem inductionOn₂ {f : Sym2 α → Sym2 β → Prop} (i : Sym2 α) (j : Sym2 β)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, f s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂)) : f i j :=
Quot.induction_on₂ i j <| by
intro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
exact hf _ _ _ _
/-- Dependent recursion principal for `Sym2`. See `Quot.rec`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec {motive : Sym2 α → Sort*}
(f : (p : α × α) → motive (Sym2.mk p))
(h : (p q : α × α) → (h : Sym2.Rel α p q) → Eq.ndrec (f p) (Sym2.sound h) = f q)
(z : Sym2 α) : motive z :=
Quot.rec f h z
/-- Dependent recursion principal for `Sym2` when the target is a `Subsingleton` type.
See `Quot.recOnSubsingleton`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected abbrev recOnSubsingleton {motive : Sym2 α → Sort*}
[(p : α × α) → Subsingleton (motive (Sym2.mk p))]
(z : Sym2 α) (f : (p : α × α) → motive (Sym2.mk p)) : motive z :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton z f
protected theorem «exists» {α : Sort _} {f : Sym2 α → Prop} :
(∃ x : Sym2 α, f x) ↔ ∃ x y, f s(x, y) :=
Quot.mk_surjective.exists.trans Prod.exists
protected theorem «forall» {α : Sort _} {f : Sym2 α → Prop} :
(∀ x : Sym2 α, f x) ↔ ∀ x y, f s(x, y) :=
Quot.mk_surjective.forall.trans Prod.forall
theorem eq_swap {a b : α} : s(a, b) = s(b, a) := Quot.sound (Rel.swap _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mk_prod_swap_eq {p : α × α} : Sym2.mk p.swap = Sym2.mk p := by
cases p
exact eq_swap
theorem congr_right {a b c : α} : s(a, b) = s(a, c) ↔ b = c := by
simp +contextual
theorem congr_left {a b c : α} : s(b, a) = s(c, a) ↔ b = c := by
simp +contextual
theorem eq_iff {x y z w : α} : s(x, y) = s(z, w) ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff {p q : α × α} : Sym2.mk p = Sym2.mk q ↔ p = q ∨ p = q.swap := by
cases p
cases q
simp only [eq_iff, Prod.mk_inj, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
/-- The universal property of `Sym2`; symmetric functions of two arguments are equivalent to
functions from `Sym2`. Note that when `β` is `Prop`, it can sometimes be more convenient to use
`Sym2.fromRel` instead. -/
def lift : { f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁ } ≃ (Sym2 α → β) where
toFun f :=
Quot.lift (uncurry ↑f) <| by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
exacts [rfl, f.prop _ _]
invFun F := ⟨curry (F ∘ Sym2.mk), fun _ _ => congr_arg F eq_swap⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := funext <| Sym2.ind fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk (f : { f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁ }) (a₁ a₂ : α) :
lift f s(a₁, a₂) = (f : α → α → β) a₁ a₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_lift_symm_apply (F : Sym2 α → β) (a₁ a₂ : α) :
(lift.symm F : α → α → β) a₁ a₂ = F s(a₁, a₂) :=
rfl
/-- A two-argument version of `Sym2.lift`. -/
def lift₂ :
{ f : α → α → β → β → γ //
∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₂ a₁ b₁ b₂ ∧ f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₁ a₂ b₂ b₁ } ≃
(Sym2 α → Sym2 β → γ) where
toFun f :=
Quotient.lift₂ (s₁ := Sym2.Rel.setoid α) (s₂ := Sym2.Rel.setoid β)
(fun (a : α × α) (b : β × β) => f.1 a.1 a.2 b.1 b.2)
(by
rintro _ _ _ _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exacts [rfl, (f.2 _ _ _ _).2, (f.2 _ _ _ _).1, (f.2 _ _ _ _).1.trans (f.2 _ _ _ _).2])
invFun F :=
⟨fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => F s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂), fun a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ => by
constructor
exacts [congr_arg₂ F eq_swap rfl, congr_arg₂ F rfl eq_swap]⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := funext₂ fun a b => Sym2.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift₂_mk
(f :
{ f : α → α → β → β → γ //
∀ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₂ a₁ b₁ b₂ ∧ f a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = f a₁ a₂ b₂ b₁ })
(a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) : lift₂ f s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂) = (f : α → α → β → β → γ) a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_lift₂_symm_apply (F : Sym2 α → Sym2 β → γ) (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
(lift₂.symm F : α → α → β → β → γ) a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ = F s(a₁, a₂) s(b₁, b₂) :=
rfl
/-- The functor `Sym2` is functorial, and this function constructs the induced maps.
-/
def map (f : α → β) : Sym2 α → Sym2 β :=
Quot.map (Prod.map f f)
(by intro _ _ h; cases h <;> constructor)
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (@id α) = id := by
ext ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
rfl
theorem map_comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} : Sym2.map (g ∘ f) = Sym2.map g ∘ Sym2.map f := by
ext ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
rfl
theorem map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (x : Sym2 α) : map g (map f x) = map (g ∘ f) x := by
induction x; aesop
@[simp]
theorem map_pair_eq (f : α → β) (x y : α) : map f s(x, y) = s(f x, f y) :=
rfl
theorem map.injective {f : α → β} (hinj : Injective f) : Injective (map f) := by
intro z z'
refine Sym2.inductionOn₂ z z' (fun x y x' y' => ?_)
simp [hinj.eq_iff]
/-- `mk a` as an embedding. This is the symmetric version of `Function.Embedding.sectL`. -/
@[simps]
def mkEmbedding (a : α) : α ↪ Sym2 α where
toFun b := s(a, b)
inj' b₁ b₁ h := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h
obtain rfl | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h <;> rfl
/-- `Sym2.map` as an embedding. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.Function.Embedding.sym2Map (f : α ↪ β) : Sym2 α ↪ Sym2 β where
toFun := map f
inj' := map.injective f.injective
lemma lift_comp_map {g : γ → α} (f : {f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁}) :
lift f ∘ map g = lift ⟨fun (c₁ c₂ : γ) => f.val (g c₁) (g c₂), fun _ _ => f.prop _ _⟩ :=
lift.symm_apply_eq.mp rfl
lemma lift_map_apply {g : γ → α} (f : {f : α → α → β // ∀ a₁ a₂, f a₁ a₂ = f a₂ a₁}) (p : Sym2 γ) :
lift f (map g p) = lift ⟨fun (c₁ c₂ : γ) => f.val (g c₁) (g c₂), fun _ _ => f.prop _ _⟩ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← lift_comp_map, comp_apply]
section Membership
/-! ### Membership and set coercion -/
|
/-- This is a predicate that determines whether a given term is a member of a term of the
symmetric square. From this point of view, the symmetric square is the subtype of
cardinality-two multisets on `α`.
| Mathlib/Data/Sym/Sym2.lean | 284 | 287 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set Filter Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_lt_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x < arcsin y :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin ⟨hx, hlt.le.trans hy⟩ ⟨hx.trans hlt.le, hy⟩ hlt
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
@[gcongr]
theorem arcsin_le_arcsin {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : arcsin x ≤ arcsin y := monotone_arcsin h
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
rcases lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_lt_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hx : -1 ≤ x) (hlt : x < y) (hy : y ≤ 1) :
arccos y < arccos x := by
unfold arccos; gcongr <;> assumption
@[gcongr]
lemma arccos_le_arccos {x y : ℝ} (hlt : x ≤ y) : arccos y ≤ arccos x := by unfold arccos; gcongr
theorem antitone_arccos : Antitone arccos := fun _ _ ↦ arccos_le_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [arccos]
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_pi {x} : arccos x = π ↔ x ≤ -1 := by
rw [arccos, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', div_two_sub_self, neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin]
theorem arccos_neg (x : ℝ) : arccos (-x) = π - arccos x := by
rw [← add_halves π, arccos, arcsin_neg, arccos, add_sub_assoc, sub_sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add]
theorem arccos_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arccos x = 0 := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_one_le hx, sub_self]
theorem arccos_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arccos x = π := by
rw [arccos, arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx, sub_neg_eq_add, add_halves]
|
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 361 | 362 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,474 | 1,475 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Solvable
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
/-!
# Nilpotent Lie algebras
Like groups, Lie algebras admit a natural concept of nilpotency. More generally, any Lie module
carries a natural concept of nilpotency. We define these here via the lower central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.lowerCentralSeries`
* `LieModule.IsNilpotent`
* `LieModule.maxNilpotentSubmodule`
* `LieAlgebra.maxNilpotentIdeal`
## Tags
lie algebra, lower central series, nilpotent, max nilpotent ideal
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section NilpotentModules
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (k : ℕ) (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
namespace LieSubmodule
/-- A generalisation of the lower central series. The zeroth term is a specified Lie submodule of
a Lie module. In the case when we specify the top ideal `⊤` of the Lie algebra, regarded as a Lie
module over itself, we get the usual lower central series of a Lie algebra.
It can be more convenient to work with this generalisation when considering the lower central series
of a Lie submodule, regarded as a Lie module in its own right, since it provides a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that the terms of the Lie submodule's lower central series are also Lie
submodules of the enclosing Lie module.
See also `LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_eq_lcs_comap` and
`LieSubmodule.lowerCentralSeries_map_eq_lcs` below, as well as `LieSubmodule.ucs`. -/
def lcs : LieSubmodule R L M → LieSubmodule R L M :=
(fun N => ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆)^[k]
@[simp]
theorem lcs_zero (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : N.lcs 0 = N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcs_succ : N.lcs (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N.lcs k⁆ :=
Function.iterate_succ_apply' (fun N' => ⁅⊤, N'⁆) k N
@[simp]
lemma lcs_sup {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M} {k : ℕ} :
(N₁ ⊔ N₂).lcs k = N₁.lcs k ⊔ N₂.lcs k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp only [LieSubmodule.lcs_succ, ih, LieSubmodule.lie_sup]
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieModule
variable (R L M)
/-- The lower central series of Lie submodules of a Lie module. -/
def lowerCentralSeries : LieSubmodule R L M :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs k
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries R L M 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ :
lowerCentralSeries R L M (k + 1) = ⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), lowerCentralSeries R L M k⁆ :=
(⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M).lcs_succ k
private theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int_aux (R₁ R₂ L M : Type*)
[CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M]
[LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R₁ L] [LieAlgebra R₂ L] [Module R₁ M] [Module R₂ M] [LieRingModule L M]
[LieModule R₁ L M] (k : ℕ) :
let I := lowerCentralSeries R₂ L M k; let S : Set M := {⁅a, b⁆ | (a : L) (b ∈ I)}
(Submodule.span R₁ S : Set M) ≤ (Submodule.span R₂ S : Set M) := by
intro I S x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx ⊢
induction hx using Submodule.closure_induction with
| zero => exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add y z hy₁ hz₁ hy₂ hz₂ => exact Submodule.add_mem _ hy₂ hz₂
| smul_mem c y hy =>
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩ := hy
rw [← smul_lie]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨c • a, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem coe_lowerCentralSeries_eq_int [LieModule R L M] (k : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries R L M k : Set M) = (lowerCentralSeries ℤ L M k : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, ← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule]
induction k with
| | zero => rfl
| succ k ih =>
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ]
rw [LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span']
rw [Set.ext_iff] at ih
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule] at ih
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_top, ih, true_and]
apply le_antisymm
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Nilpotent.lean | 111 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj]
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj, mul_comm]
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
| theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 513 | 513 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbotD_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbotD_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
natDegree (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_natCast _
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
theorem withBotSucc_degree_eq_natDegree_add_one (h : p ≠ 0) : p.degree.succ = p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
exact WithBot.succ_coe p.natDegree
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
rcases le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h | h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
| · rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 384 | 388 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.MapDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
/-!
# Monoid algebras
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul_comm, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) where
algebraMap := singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by simp
theorem single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A]
[Algebra k A] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a (algebraMap k A b) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) b * of A G a := by simp
instance isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleOneAlgHom : A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleOneRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap k A)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom (k := k).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| Finsupp.lhom_ext' fun a => LinearMap.ext_ring (h a)
-- The priority must be `high`.
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h :
(φ₁ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) where
invFun f := (f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun F := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
right_inv F := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
variable {k G H A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F a :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F a := by simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : G →* A) : ⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (x : G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : G →* A) (a b) : lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F a := by
rw [lift_def, liftNC_single, Algebra.smul_def, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe]
theorem lift_of (F : G →* A) (x) : lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := by simp
theorem lift_unique' (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two magmas, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between their magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] [FunLike F G H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₙₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
variable (A) in
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) r) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A H) r := by
simp only [coe_algebraMap, mapDomain_single, map_one, (· ∘ ·)]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {H F : Type*}
[Monoid H] [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (MonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (MonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [MonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[Monoid G₁] [Monoid G₂] [Monoid G₃] (f : G₁ →* G₂) (g : G₂ →* G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`MonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃* H) : MonoidAlgebra A G ≃ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃* H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (MulEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end lift
section
variable (k)
/-- When `V` is a `k[G]`-module, multiplication by a group element `g` is a `k`-linear map. -/
def GroupSMul.linearMap [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G) : V →ₗ[k] V where
toFun v := single g (1 : k) • v
map_add' x y := smul_add (single g (1 : k)) x y
map_smul' _c _x := smul_algebra_smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem GroupSMul.linearMap_apply [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V]
[Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G)
(v : V) : (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g) v = single g (1 : k) • v :=
rfl
section
variable {k}
variable [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] {V : Type u₃} {W : Type u₄} [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [AddCommMonoid W]
[Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
(f : V →ₗ[k] W)
/-- Build a `k[G]`-linear map from a `k`-linear map and evidence that it is `G`-equivariant. -/
def equivariantOfLinearOfComm
(h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v) :
V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W where
toFun := f
map_add' v v' := by simp
map_smul' c v := by
refine Finsupp.induction c ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro g r c' _nm _nz w
dsimp at *
simp only [add_smul, f.map_add, w, add_left_inj, single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of, ← smul_smul]
rw [algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, f.map_smul,
of_apply, h g v]
variable (h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v)
@[simp]
theorem equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply (v : V) : (equivariantOfLinearOfComm f h) v = f v :=
rfl
end
end
end MonoidAlgebra
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G H}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Add G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- The functor `G ↦ k[G]`, from the category of magmas to the category of
non-unital, non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other
direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A) :=
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k : (Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (_ →ₙₐ[k] A)) with
toFun := fun f =>
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k f :) with
toFun := fun a => sum a fun m t => t • f (Multiplicative.ofAdd m) }
invFun := fun F => F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) }
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra R k[G]` whenever we have `Algebra R k`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k k[G]`.
-/
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
Algebra R k[G] where
algebraMap := singleZeroRingHom.comp (algebraMap R k)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, mul_single_zero_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] : k →ₐ[R] k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
(algebraMap R k[G] : R → k[G]) = single 0 ∘ algebraMap R k :=
rfl
instance isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleZeroAlgHom : k →ₐ[R] k[G]) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleZeroRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k[G]) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom (R := R).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : Multiplicative G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : (φ₁ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`k[G] →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (Multiplicative G →* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :=
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ with
invFun := fun f => (f : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun := fun F =>
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ F with
toFun := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _ } }
variable {k G A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) := by
simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : Multiplicative G →* A) :
⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x.toAdd 1) :=
rfl
theorem lift_of (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := MonoidAlgebra.lift_of F x
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (a b) :
lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
MonoidAlgebra.lift_single F (.ofAdd a) b
lemma lift_of' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : G) :
lift k G A F (of' k G x) = F (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) :=
lift_of F x
theorem lift_unique' (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
theorem algHom_ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A} :
(∀ x, φ₁ (Finsupp.single x 1) = φ₂ (Finsupp.single x 1)) ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
⟨fun h => algHom_ext h, by rintro rfl _; rfl⟩
end lift
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap (A : Type*) {H F : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k A[G] r) = algebraMap k A[H] r := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, mapDomain_single, AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap, map_zero]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two additive magmas, then `Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a
non-unital algebra homomorphism between their additive magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Add G] [Add H] [FunLike F G H] [AddHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₙₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
/-- If `f : G → H` is an additive homomorphism between two additive monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their add monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G]
{H F : Type*} [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (AddMonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (AddMonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [AddMonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G₁] [AddMonoid G₂] [AddMonoid G₃] (f : G₁ →+ G₂) (g : G₂ →+ G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`AddMonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃+ H) : A[G] ≃ₐ[k] A[H] :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃+ H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (AddEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- The algebra equivalence between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Multiplicative`. -/
def AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicativeAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
AddMonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G) :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative k G with
commutes' := fun r => by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative] }
/-- The algebra equivalence between `MonoidAlgebra` and `AddMonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Additive`. -/
def MonoidAlgebra.toAdditiveAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [Monoid G] :
MonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] AddMonoidAlgebra k (Additive G) :=
{ MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive k G with commutes' := fun r => by simp [MonoidAlgebra.toAdditive] }
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 2,100 | 2,104 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
/-!
# `max` and `min`
This file proves basic properties about maxima and minima on a `LinearOrder`.
## Tags
min, max
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a b c d : α}
-- translate from lattices to linear orders (sup → max, inf → min)
theorem le_min_iff : c ≤ min a b ↔ c ≤ a ∧ c ≤ b :=
le_inf_iff
theorem le_max_iff : a ≤ max b c ↔ a ≤ b ∨ a ≤ c :=
le_sup_iff
theorem min_le_iff : min a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∨ b ≤ c :=
inf_le_iff
theorem max_le_iff : max a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
sup_le_iff
theorem lt_min_iff : a < min b c ↔ a < b ∧ a < c :=
lt_inf_iff
theorem lt_max_iff : a < max b c ↔ a < b ∨ a < c :=
lt_sup_iff
theorem min_lt_iff : min a b < c ↔ a < c ∨ b < c :=
inf_lt_iff
theorem max_lt_iff : max a b < c ↔ a < c ∧ b < c :=
sup_lt_iff
theorem max_le_max : a ≤ c → b ≤ d → max a b ≤ max c d :=
sup_le_sup
theorem max_le_max_left (c) (h : a ≤ b) : max c a ≤ max c b := sup_le_sup_left h c
theorem max_le_max_right (c) (h : a ≤ b) : max a c ≤ max b c := sup_le_sup_right h c
theorem min_le_min : a ≤ c → b ≤ d → min a b ≤ min c d :=
inf_le_inf
theorem min_le_min_left (c) (h : a ≤ b) : min c a ≤ min c b := inf_le_inf_left c h
theorem min_le_min_right (c) (h : a ≤ b) : min a c ≤ min b c := inf_le_inf_right c h
theorem le_max_of_le_left : a ≤ b → a ≤ max b c :=
le_sup_of_le_left
theorem le_max_of_le_right : a ≤ c → a ≤ max b c :=
le_sup_of_le_right
theorem lt_max_of_lt_left (h : a < b) : a < max b c :=
h.trans_le (le_max_left b c)
theorem lt_max_of_lt_right (h : a < c) : a < max b c :=
h.trans_le (le_max_right b c)
theorem min_le_of_left_le : a ≤ c → min a b ≤ c :=
inf_le_of_left_le
theorem min_le_of_right_le : b ≤ c → min a b ≤ c :=
inf_le_of_right_le
theorem min_lt_of_left_lt (h : a < c) : min a b < c :=
(min_le_left a b).trans_lt h
theorem min_lt_of_right_lt (h : b < c) : min a b < c :=
(min_le_right a b).trans_lt h
lemma max_min_distrib_left (a b c : α) : max a (min b c) = min (max a b) (max a c) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
lemma max_min_distrib_right (a b c : α) : max (min a b) c = min (max a c) (max b c) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
lemma min_max_distrib_left (a b c : α) : min a (max b c) = max (min a b) (min a c) :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
lemma min_max_distrib_right (a b c : α) : min (max a b) c = max (min a c) (min b c) :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
theorem min_le_max : min a b ≤ max a b :=
le_trans (min_le_left a b) (le_max_left a b)
theorem min_eq_left_iff : min a b = a ↔ a ≤ b :=
inf_eq_left
theorem min_eq_right_iff : min a b = b ↔ b ≤ a :=
inf_eq_right
theorem max_eq_left_iff : max a b = a ↔ b ≤ a :=
sup_eq_left
theorem max_eq_right_iff : max a b = b ↔ a ≤ b :=
sup_eq_right
/-- For elements `a` and `b` of a linear order, either `min a b = a` and `a ≤ b`,
or `min a b = b` and `b < a`.
Use cases on this lemma to automate linarith in inequalities -/
theorem min_cases (a b : α) : min a b = a ∧ a ≤ b ∨ min a b = b ∧ b < a := by
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· left
exact ⟨min_eq_left h, h⟩
· right
exact ⟨min_eq_right (le_of_lt (not_le.mp h)), not_le.mp h⟩
/-- For elements `a` and `b` of a linear order, either `max a b = a` and `b ≤ a`,
or `max a b = b` and `a < b`.
Use cases on this lemma to automate linarith in inequalities -/
theorem max_cases (a b : α) : max a b = a ∧ b ≤ a ∨ max a b = b ∧ a < b :=
@min_cases αᵒᵈ _ a b
theorem min_eq_iff : min a b = c ↔ a = c ∧ a ≤ b ∨ b = c ∧ b ≤ a := by
constructor
· intro h
refine Or.imp (fun h' => ?_) (fun h' => ?_) (le_total a b) <;> exact ⟨by simpa [h'] using h, h'⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, h⟩ | ⟨rfl, h⟩) <;> simp [h]
theorem max_eq_iff : max a b = c ↔ a = c ∧ b ≤ a ∨ b = c ∧ a ≤ b :=
@min_eq_iff αᵒᵈ _ a b c
theorem min_lt_min_left_iff : min a c < min b c ↔ a < b ∧ a < c := by
simp_rw [lt_min_iff, min_lt_iff, or_iff_left (lt_irrefl _)]
exact and_congr_left fun h => or_iff_left_of_imp h.trans
theorem min_lt_min_right_iff : min a b < min a c ↔ b < c ∧ b < a := by
simp_rw [min_comm a, min_lt_min_left_iff]
theorem max_lt_max_left_iff : max a c < max b c ↔ a < b ∧ c < b :=
@min_lt_min_left_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem max_lt_max_right_iff : max a b < max a c ↔ b < c ∧ a < c :=
@min_lt_min_right_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- An instance asserting that `max a a = a` -/
instance max_idem : Std.IdempotentOp (α := α) max where
idempotent := by simp
-- short-circuit type class inference
/-- An instance asserting that `min a a = a` -/
instance min_idem : Std.IdempotentOp (α := α) min where
idempotent := by simp
-- short-circuit type class inference
theorem min_lt_max : min a b < max a b ↔ a ≠ b :=
inf_lt_sup
theorem max_lt_max (h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b < d) : max a b < max c d :=
max_lt (lt_max_of_lt_left h₁) (lt_max_of_lt_right h₂)
theorem min_lt_min (h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b < d) : min a b < min c d :=
@max_lt_max αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
theorem min_right_comm (a b c : α) : min (min a b) c = min (min a c) b := by
rw [min_assoc, min_comm b, min_assoc]
theorem Max.left_comm (a b c : α) : max a (max b c) = max b (max a c) := by
rw [← max_assoc, max_comm a, max_assoc]
theorem Max.right_comm (a b c : α) : max (max a b) c = max (max a c) b := by
rw [max_assoc, max_comm b, max_assoc]
theorem MonotoneOn.map_max (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : f (max a b) =
max (f a) (f b) := by
rcases le_total a b with h | h <;>
simp only [max_eq_right, max_eq_left, hf ha hb, hf hb ha, h]
theorem MonotoneOn.map_min (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : f (min a b) =
min (f a) (f b) := hf.dual.map_max ha hb
theorem AntitoneOn.map_max (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : f (max a b) =
min (f a) (f b) := hf.dual_right.map_max ha hb
theorem AntitoneOn.map_min (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : f (min a b) =
max (f a) (f b) := hf.dual.map_max ha hb
theorem Monotone.map_max (hf : Monotone f) : f (max a b) = max (f a) (f b) := by
rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, hf h]
theorem Monotone.map_min (hf : Monotone f) : f (min a b) = min (f a) (f b) :=
hf.dual.map_max
theorem Antitone.map_max (hf : Antitone f) : f (max a b) = min (f a) (f b) := by
rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, hf h]
theorem Antitone.map_min (hf : Antitone f) : f (min a b) = max (f a) (f b) :=
hf.dual.map_max
theorem min_choice (a b : α) : min a b = a ∨ min a b = b := by cases le_total a b <;> simp [*]
theorem max_choice (a b : α) : max a b = a ∨ max a b = b :=
@min_choice αᵒᵈ _ a b
theorem le_of_max_le_left {a b c : α} (h : max a b ≤ c) : a ≤ c :=
le_trans (le_max_left _ _) h
theorem le_of_max_le_right {a b c : α} (h : max a b ≤ c) : b ≤ c :=
le_trans (le_max_right _ _) h
instance instCommutativeMax : Std.Commutative (α := α) max where comm := max_comm
instance instAssociativeMax : Std.Associative (α := α) max where assoc := max_assoc
instance instCommutativeMin : Std.Commutative (α := α) min where comm := min_comm
instance instAssociativeMin : Std.Associative (α := α) min where assoc := min_assoc
theorem max_left_commutative : LeftCommutative (max : α → α → α) := ⟨max_left_comm⟩
theorem min_left_commutative : LeftCommutative (min : α → α → α) := ⟨min_left_comm⟩
end
| Mathlib/Order/MinMax.lean | 263 | 264 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Ordered Subtraction
This file proves lemmas relating (truncated) subtraction with an order. We provide a class
`OrderedSub` stating that `a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b`.
The subtraction discussed here could both be normal subtraction in an additive group or truncated
subtraction on a canonically ordered monoid (`ℕ`, `Multiset`, `PartENat`, `ENNReal`, ...)
## Implementation details
`OrderedSub` is a mixin type-class, so that we can use the results in this file even in cases
where we don't have a `CanonicallyOrderedAdd` instance
(even though that is our main focus). Conversely, this means we can use
`CanonicallyOrderedAdd` without necessarily having to define a subtraction.
The results in this file are ordered by the type-class assumption needed to prove it.
This means that similar results might not be close to each other. Furthermore, we don't prove
implications if a bi-implication can be proven under the same assumptions.
Lemmas using this class are named using `tsub` instead of `sub` (short for "truncated subtraction").
This is to avoid naming conflicts with similar lemmas about ordered groups.
We provide a second version of most results that require `[AddLeftReflectLE α]`. In the
second version we replace this type-class assumption by explicit `AddLECancellable` assumptions.
TODO: maybe we should make a multiplicative version of this, so that we can replace some identical
lemmas about subtraction/division in `Ordered[Add]CommGroup` with these.
TODO: generalize `Nat.le_of_le_of_sub_le_sub_right`, `Nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff`,
`Nat.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq`
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `OrderedSub α` means that `α` has a subtraction characterized by `a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b`.
In other words, `a - b` is the least `c` such that `a ≤ b + c`.
This is satisfied both by the subtraction in additive ordered groups and by truncated subtraction
in canonically ordered monoids on many specific types.
-/
class OrderedSub (α : Type*) [LE α] [Add α] [Sub α] : Prop where
/-- `a - b` provides a lower bound on `c` such that `a ≤ c + b`. -/
tsub_le_iff_right : ∀ a b c : α, a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b
section Add
@[simp]
theorem tsub_le_iff_right [LE α] [Add α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c : α} :
a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
OrderedSub.tsub_le_iff_right a b c
variable [Preorder α] [Add α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b : α}
/-- See `add_tsub_cancel_right` for the equality if `AddLeftReflectLE α`. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_right : a + b - b ≤ a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mpr le_rfl
theorem le_tsub_add : b ≤ b - a + a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mp le_rfl
end Add
/-! ### Preorder -/
section OrderedAddCommSemigroup
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section AddCommSemigroup
variable [AddCommSemigroup α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c d : α}
/- TODO: Most results can be generalized to [Add α] [@Std.Commutative α (· + ·)] -/
theorem tsub_le_iff_left : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c := by rw [tsub_le_iff_right, add_comm]
theorem le_add_tsub : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mp le_rfl
/-- See `add_tsub_cancel_left` for the equality if `AddLeftReflectLE α`. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_left : a + b - a ≤ b :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr le_rfl
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a - c ≤ b - c :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr <| h.trans le_add_tsub
theorem tsub_le_iff_tsub_le : a - b ≤ c ↔ a - c ≤ b := by rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_right]
/-- See `tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le` for the equality. -/
theorem tsub_tsub_le : b - (b - a) ≤ a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mpr le_add_tsub
section Cov
variable [AddLeftMono α]
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : c - b ≤ c - a :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr <| le_add_tsub.trans <| add_le_add_right h _
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d ≤ b - c :=
(tsub_le_tsub_right hab _).trans <| tsub_le_tsub_left hcd _
theorem antitone_const_tsub : Antitone fun x => c - x := fun _ _ hxy => tsub_le_tsub rfl.le hxy
/-- See `add_tsub_assoc_of_le` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_assoc : a + b - c ≤ a + (b - c) := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_left_comm]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub a
/-- See `tsub_add_eq_add_tsub` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_tsub_add : a + b - c ≤ a - c + b := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm _ b]
exact add_tsub_le_assoc
theorem add_le_add_add_tsub : a + b ≤ a + c + (b - c) := by
rw [add_assoc]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub a
theorem le_tsub_add_add : a + b ≤ a - c + (b + c) := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm (a - c)]
exact add_le_add_add_tsub
theorem tsub_le_tsub_add_tsub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
exact le_add_tsub.trans (add_le_add_right le_add_tsub _)
theorem tsub_tsub_tsub_le_tsub : c - a - (c - b) ≤ b - a := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_left, add_left_comm]
exact le_tsub_add.trans (add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _)
theorem tsub_tsub_le_tsub_add {a b c : α} : a - (b - c) ≤ a - b + c :=
tsub_le_iff_right.2 <|
calc
a ≤ a - b + b := le_tsub_add
_ ≤ a - b + (c + (b - c)) := add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _
_ = a - b + c + (b - c) := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
/-- See `tsub_add_tsub_comm` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub : a + b - (c + d) ≤ a - c + (b - d) := by
rw [add_comm c, tsub_le_iff_left, add_assoc, ← tsub_le_iff_left, ← tsub_le_iff_left]
refine (tsub_le_tsub_right add_tsub_le_assoc c).trans ?_
rw [add_comm a, add_comm (a - c)]
exact add_tsub_le_assoc
/-- See `add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_left` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_left : a + b - (a + c) ≤ b - c := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_assoc]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _
/-- See `add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_right` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_right : a + c - (b + c) ≤ a - b := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact add_le_add_right le_add_tsub c
end Cov
/-! #### Lemmas that assume that an element is `AddLECancellable` -/
namespace AddLECancellable
protected theorem le_add_tsub_swap (hb : AddLECancellable b) : a ≤ b + a - b :=
hb le_add_tsub
protected theorem le_add_tsub (hb : AddLECancellable b) : a ≤ a + b - b := by
rw [add_comm]
exact hb.le_add_tsub_swap
protected theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_left (ha : AddLECancellable a) (h : a + b ≤ c) : b ≤ c - a :=
ha <| h.trans le_add_tsub
protected theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_right (hb : AddLECancellable b) (h : a + b ≤ c) : a ≤ c - b :=
hb.le_tsub_of_add_le_left <| by rwa [add_comm]
end AddLECancellable
/-! ### Lemmas where addition is order-reflecting -/
section Contra
variable [AddLeftReflectLE α]
theorem le_add_tsub_swap : a ≤ b + a - b :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_add_tsub_swap
theorem le_add_tsub' : a ≤ a + b - b :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_add_tsub
theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_left (h : a + b ≤ c) : b ≤ c - a :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_tsub_of_add_le_left h
theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_right (h : a + b ≤ c) : a ≤ c - b :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_tsub_of_add_le_right h
end Contra
end AddCommSemigroup
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b : α}
theorem tsub_nonpos : a - b ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_zero]
alias ⟨_, tsub_nonpos_of_le⟩ := tsub_nonpos
end Preorder
/-! ### Partial order -/
variable [PartialOrder α] [AddCommSemigroup α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c d : α}
theorem tsub_tsub (b a c : α) : b - a - c = b - (a + c) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_left, ← add_assoc, ← tsub_le_iff_left]
· rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_assoc, ← tsub_le_iff_left, ← tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub (a b c : α) : a - (b + c) = a - b - c :=
(tsub_tsub _ _ _).symm
theorem tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub_swap (a b c : α) : a - (b + c) = a - c - b := by
rw [add_comm]
apply tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub
theorem tsub_right_comm : a - b - c = a - c - b := by
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub_swap]
/-! ### Lemmas that assume that an element is `AddLECancellable`. -/
namespace AddLECancellable
/-- See `AddLECancellable.tsub_eq_of_eq_add'` for a version assuming that `a = c + b` itself is
cancellable rather than `b`. -/
protected theorem tsub_eq_of_eq_add (hb : AddLECancellable b) (h : a = c + b) : a - b = c :=
le_antisymm (tsub_le_iff_right.mpr h.le) <| by
rw [h]
exact hb.le_add_tsub
/-- Weaker version of `AddLECancellable.tsub_eq_of_eq_add` assuming that `a = c + b` itself is
cancellable rather than `b`. -/
protected lemma tsub_eq_of_eq_add' [AddLeftMono α] (ha : AddLECancellable a)
(h : a = c + b) : a - b = c := (h ▸ ha).of_add_right.tsub_eq_of_eq_add h
/-- See `AddLECancellable.eq_tsub_of_add_eq'` for a version assuming that `b = a + c` itself is
cancellable rather than `c`. -/
protected theorem eq_tsub_of_add_eq (hc : AddLECancellable c) (h : a + c = b) : a = b - c :=
(hc.tsub_eq_of_eq_add h.symm).symm
/-- Weaker version of `AddLECancellable.eq_tsub_of_add_eq` assuming that `b = a + c` itself is
cancellable rather than `c`. -/
protected lemma eq_tsub_of_add_eq' [AddLeftMono α] (hb : AddLECancellable b)
(h : a + c = b) : a = b - c := (hb.tsub_eq_of_eq_add' h.symm).symm
/-- See `AddLECancellable.tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev'` for a version assuming that `a = b + c` itself is
cancellable rather than `b`. -/
protected theorem tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev (hb : AddLECancellable b) (h : a = b + c) : a - b = c :=
hb.tsub_eq_of_eq_add <| by rw [add_comm, h]
/-- Weaker version of `AddLECancellable.tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev` assuming that `a = b + c` itself is
cancellable rather than `b`. -/
protected lemma tsub_eq_of_eq_add_rev' [AddLeftMono α]
| (ha : AddLECancellable a) (h : a = b + c) : a - b = c :=
ha.tsub_eq_of_eq_add' <| by rw [add_comm, h]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Sub/Defs.lean | 276 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
/-!
# The field structure of rational functions
## Main definitions
Working with rational functions as polynomials:
- `RatFunc.instField` provides a field structure
You can use `IsFractionRing` API to treat `RatFunc` as the field of fractions of polynomials:
* `algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps polynomials to rational functions
* `IsFractionRing.algEquiv` maps other fields of fractions of `K[X]` to `RatFunc K`,
in particular:
* `FractionRing.algEquiv K[X] (RatFunc K)` maps the generic field of
fraction construction to `RatFunc K`. Combine this with `AlgEquiv.restrictScalars` to change
the `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K[X]] RatFunc K` to `FractionRing K[X] ≃ₐ[K] RatFunc K`.
Working with rational functions as fractions:
- `RatFunc.num` and `RatFunc.denom` give the numerator and denominator.
These values are chosen to be coprime and such that `RatFunc.denom` is monic.
Lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other types, by mapping and dividing, as long
as the homomorphism retains the non-zero-divisor property:
- `RatFunc.liftMonoidWithZeroHom` lifts a `K[X] →*₀ G₀` to
a `RatFunc K →*₀ G₀`, where `[CommRing K] [CommGroupWithZero G₀]`
- `RatFunc.liftRingHom` lifts a `K[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc K →+* L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L]`
- `RatFunc.liftAlgHom` lifts a `K[X] →ₐ[S] L` to a `RatFunc K →ₐ[S] L`,
where `[CommRing K] [Field L] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] [Algebra S L]`
This is satisfied by injective homs.
We also have lifting homomorphisms of polynomials to other polynomials,
with the same condition on retaining the non-zero-divisor property across the map:
- `RatFunc.map` lifts `K[X] →* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapRingHom` lifts `K[X] →+* R[X]` when `[CommRing K] [CommRing R]`
- `RatFunc.mapAlgHom` lifts `K[X] →ₐ[S] R[X]` when
`[CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]`
-/
universe u v
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Field
variable [CommRing K]
/-- The zero rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def zero : RatFunc K :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Zero (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.zero⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_zero : (ofFractionRing 0 : RatFunc K) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
/-- Addition of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def add : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p + q⟩
instance : Add (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.add⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_add (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p + q) = ofFractionRing p + ofFractionRing q :=
(add_def _ _).symm
/-- Subtraction of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def sub : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p - q⟩
instance : Sub (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.sub⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_sub (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p - q) = ofFractionRing p - ofFractionRing q :=
(sub_def _ _).symm
/-- Additive inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def neg : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨-p⟩
instance : Neg (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.neg⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_neg (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (-p) = -ofFractionRing p :=
(neg_def _).symm
/-- The multiplicative unit of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def one : RatFunc K :=
⟨1⟩
instance : One (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.one⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_one : (ofFractionRing 1 : RatFunc K) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
/-- Multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def mul : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p * q⟩
instance : Mul (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.mul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_mul (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p * q) = ofFractionRing p * ofFractionRing q :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
/-- Division of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def div : RatFunc K → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩, ⟨q⟩ => ⟨p / q⟩
instance : Div (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.div⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_div (p q : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (p / q) = ofFractionRing p / ofFractionRing q :=
(div_def _ _).symm
/-- Multiplicative inverse of a rational function. -/
protected irreducible_def inv : RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p⁻¹⟩
instance : Inv (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.inv⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_inv (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing p⁻¹ = (ofFractionRing p)⁻¹ :=
(inv_def _).symm
-- Auxiliary lemma for the `Field` instance
theorem mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {p : RatFunc K}, p ≠ 0 → p * p⁻¹ = 1
| ⟨p⟩, h => by
have : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h <| by rw [hp, ofFractionRing_zero]
simpa only [← ofFractionRing_inv, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_one,
ofFractionRing.injEq] using
mul_inv_cancel₀ this
end IsDomain
section SMul
variable {R : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication of rational functions. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : R → RatFunc K → RatFunc K
| r, ⟨p⟩ => ⟨r • p⟩
instance [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] : SMul R (RatFunc K) :=
⟨RatFunc.smul⟩
theorem ofFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : FractionRing K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (c • p) = c • ofFractionRing p :=
(smul_def _ _).symm
theorem toFractionRing_smul [SMul R (FractionRing K[X])] (c : R) (p : RatFunc K) :
toFractionRing (c • p) = c • toFractionRing p := by
cases p
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul]
theorem smul_eq_C_smul (x : RatFunc K) (r : K) : r • x = Polynomial.C r • x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Localization.induction_on
rw [← ofFractionRing_smul, ← ofFractionRing_smul, Localization.smul_mk,
Localization.smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, Polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul]
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
variable [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]]
variable [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]]
theorem mk_smul (c : R) (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk (c • p) q = c • RatFunc.mk p q := by
letI : SMulZeroClass R (FractionRing K[X]) := inferInstance
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mk_zero, mk_zero, ← ofFractionRing_smul, smul_zero]
· rw [mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, ← Localization.smul_mk, ←
ofFractionRing_smul]
instance : IsScalarTower R K[X] (RatFunc K) :=
⟨fun c p q => q.induction_on' fun q r _ => by rw [← mk_smul, smul_assoc, mk_smul, mk_smul]⟩
end IsDomain
end SMul
variable (K)
instance [Subsingleton K] : Subsingleton (RatFunc K) :=
toFractionRing_injective.subsingleton
instance : Inhabited (RatFunc K) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNontrivial [Nontrivial K] : Nontrivial (RatFunc K) :=
ofFractionRing_injective.nontrivial
/-- `RatFunc K` is isomorphic to the field of fractions of `K[X]`, as rings.
This is an auxiliary definition; `simp`-normal form is `IsLocalization.algEquiv`.
-/
@[simps apply]
def toFractionRingRingEquiv : RatFunc K ≃+* FractionRing K[X] where
toFun := toFractionRing
invFun := ofFractionRing
left_inv := fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_add' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' := fun ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩ => by simp [← ofFractionRing_mul]
end Field
section TacticInterlude
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by working in `FractionRing K[X]`. -/
macro "frac_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
· repeat (rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _))
try simp only [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_sub,
← ofFractionRing_neg, ← ofFractionRing_one, ← ofFractionRing_mul, ← ofFractionRing_div,
← ofFractionRing_inv,
add_assoc, zero_add, add_zero, mul_assoc, mul_zero, mul_one, mul_add, inv_zero,
add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, div_eq_mul_inv,
add_mul, zero_mul, one_mul, neg_mul, mul_neg, add_neg_cancel])
/-- Solve equations for `RatFunc K` by applying `RatFunc.induction_on`. -/
macro "smul_tac" : tactic => `(tactic|
repeat
(first
| rintro (⟨⟩ : RatFunc _)
| intro) <;>
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_smul] <;>
simp only [add_comm, mul_comm, zero_smul, succ_nsmul, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_add, mul_one, mul_zero,
neg_add, mul_neg,
Int.cast_zero, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
Int.cast_negSucc, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_succ,
Localization.mk_zero, Localization.add_mk_self, Localization.neg_mk,
ofFractionRing_zero, ← ofFractionRing_add, ← ofFractionRing_neg])
end TacticInterlude
section CommRing
variable (K) [CommRing K]
/-- `RatFunc K` is a commutative monoid.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instCommMonoid : CommMonoid (RatFunc K) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc := by frac_tac
mul_comm := by frac_tac
one := 1
one_mul := by frac_tac
mul_one := by frac_tac
npow := npowRec
/-- `RatFunc K` is an additive commutative group.
This is an intermediate step on the way to the full instance `RatFunc.instCommRing`.
-/
def instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (RatFunc K) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by frac_tac
add_comm := by frac_tac
zero := 0
zero_add := by frac_tac
add_zero := by frac_tac
neg := Neg.neg
neg_add_cancel := by frac_tac
sub := Sub.sub
sub_eq_add_neg := by frac_tac
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by smul_tac
nsmul_succ _ := by smul_tac
zsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul_zero' := by smul_tac
zsmul_succ' _ := by smul_tac
zsmul_neg' _ := by smul_tac
instance instCommRing : CommRing (RatFunc K) :=
{ instCommMonoid K, instAddCommGroup K with
zero := 0
sub := Sub.sub
zero_mul := by frac_tac
mul_zero := by frac_tac
left_distrib := by frac_tac
right_distrib := by frac_tac
one := 1
nsmul := (· • ·)
zsmul := (· • ·)
npow := npowRec }
variable {K}
section LiftHom
open RatFunc
variable {G₀ L R S F : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero G₀] [Field L] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable [FunLike F R[X] S[X]]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def map [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →* RatFunc S where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f
(fun n d => if h : φ d ∈ S[X]⁰ then ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, h⟩) else 0)
fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
simp only [Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq), Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ hq'),
dif_pos, ofFractionRing.injEq, Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff]
refine Localization.r_of_eq ?_
simpa only [map_mul] using congr_arg φ h
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, OneMemClass.one_mem, dite_true, ofFractionRing.injEq,
Localization.mk_one, Localization.mk_eq_monoidOf_mk', Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x; obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
have hq : φ q ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q.prop
have hq' : φ q' ∈ S[X]⁰ := hφ q'.prop
have hqq' : φ ↑(q * q') ∈ S[X]⁰ := by simpa using Submonoid.mul_mem _ hq hq'
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, dif_pos hq,
dif_pos hq', dif_pos hqq', ← ofFractionRing_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul,
Localization.mk_mul, Submonoid.mk_mul_mk]
theorem map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F)
(hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
map φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) =
ofFractionRing (Localization.mk (φ n) ⟨φ d, hφ d.prop⟩) := by
simp only [map, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
Submonoid.mem_comap.mp (hφ d.2), ↓reduceDIte]
theorem map_injective [MonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ)
(hf : Function.Injective φ) : Function.Injective (map φ hφ) := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
simpa only [map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, ofFractionRing_injective.eq_iff,
Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff, Localization.r_iff_exists, mul_cancel_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors,
exists_const, ← map_mul, hf.eq_iff] using h
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism that maps polynomials `φ : R[X] →+* S[X]`
to a `RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S`,
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def mapRingHom [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
RatFunc R →+* RatFunc S :=
{ map φ hφ with
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, ← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰),
← Localization.mk_zero (1 : S[X]⁰), map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, map_zero,
Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_zero]
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction x using Localization.induction_on
induction y using Localization.induction_on
· simp only [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk, map_add, map_mul,
MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul,
-- We have to specify `S[X]⁰` to `mk_mul_mk`, otherwise it will try to rewrite
-- the wrong occurrence.
Submonoid.mk_mul_mk S[X]⁰] }
theorem coe_mapRingHom_eq_coe_map [RingHomClass F R[X] S[X]] (φ : F) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ S[X]⁰.comap φ) :
(mapRingHom φ hφ : RatFunc R → RatFunc S) = map φ hφ :=
rfl
-- TODO: Generalize to `FunLike` classes,
/-- Lift a monoid with zero homomorphism `R[X] →*₀ G₀` to a `RatFunc R →*₀ G₀`
on the condition that `φ` maps non zero divisors to non zero divisors,
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftMonoidWithZeroHom (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →*₀ G₀ where
toFun f :=
RatFunc.liftOn f (fun p q => φ p / φ q) fun {p q p' q'} hq hq' h => by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim p q, Subsingleton.elim p' q, Subsingleton.elim q' q]
rw [div_eq_div_iff, ← map_mul, mul_comm p, h, map_mul, mul_comm] <;>
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ ‹_›)
map_one' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_one, ← Localization.mk_one, liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one, div_one]
map_mul' x y := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with p q
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p' q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_mul, Localization.mk_mul]
simp only [liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk, div_mul_div_comm, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
map_zero' := by
simp_rw [← ofFractionRing_zero, ← Localization.mk_zero (1 : R[X]⁰), liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk,
map_zero, zero_div]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ)
(n : R[X]) (d : R[X]⁰) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftOn_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →*₀ G₀) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ G₀⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ') := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with a
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with a'
simp_rw [liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
intro h
congr 1
refine Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr (Localization.r_of_eq (M := R[X]) ?_)
have := mul_eq_mul_of_div_eq_div _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [← map_mul, ← map_mul, hφ.eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_comm a'.fst] at this
all_goals exact map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)
/-- Lift an injective ring homomorphism `R[X] →+* L` to a `RatFunc R →+* L`
by mapping both the numerator and denominator and quotienting them. -/
def liftRingHom (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) : RatFunc R →+* L :=
{ liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ.toMonoidWithZeroHom hφ with
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidWithZeroHom.toZeroHom_coe]
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (x + y) y, Subsingleton.elim x 0, map_zero, zero_add]
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y⟩ := y
induction' x using Localization.induction_on with pq
induction' y using Localization.induction_on with p'q'
obtain ⟨p, q⟩ := pq
obtain ⟨p', q'⟩ := p'q'
rw [← ofFractionRing_add, Localization.add_mk]
simp only [RingHom.toMonoidWithZeroHom_eq_coe,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
rw [div_add_div, div_eq_div_iff]
· rw [mul_comm _ p, mul_comm _ p', mul_comm _ (φ p'), add_comm]
simp only [map_add, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul]
all_goals
try simp only [← map_mul, ← Submonoid.coe_mul]
exact nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (SetLike.coe_mem _)) }
theorem liftRingHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (n : R[X])
(d : R[X]⁰) : liftRingHom φ hφ (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk n d)) = φ n / φ d :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ hφ _ _
theorem liftRingHom_injective [Nontrivial R] (φ : R[X] →+* L) (hφ : Function.Injective φ)
(hφ' : R[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ := nonZeroDivisors_le_comap_nonZeroDivisors_of_injective _ hφ) :
Function.Injective (liftRingHom φ hφ') :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_injective _ hφ
end LiftHom
variable (K)
@[stacks 09FK]
instance instField [IsDomain K] : Field (RatFunc K) where
inv_zero := by frac_tac
div := (· / ·)
div_eq_mul_inv := by frac_tac
mul_inv_cancel _ := mul_inv_cancel
zpow := zpowRec
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
section IsFractionRing
/-! ### `RatFunc` as field of fractions of `Polynomial` -/
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K]
instance (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] : Algebra R (RatFunc K) where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun x := RatFunc.mk (algebraMap _ _ x) 1
map_add' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_add, ofFractionRing_add]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_mul, ofFractionRing_mul]
map_one' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_one, ofFractionRing_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [mk_one', RingHom.map_zero, ofFractionRing_zero] }
smul := (· • ·)
smul_def' c x := by
induction' x using RatFunc.induction_on' with p q hq
rw [RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, mk_one', ← mk_smul,
mk_def_of_ne (c • p) hq, mk_def_of_ne p hq, ← ofFractionRing_mul,
IsLocalization.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' _ _ := mul_comm _ _
variable {K}
/-- The coercion from polynomials to rational functions, implemented as the algebra map from a
domain to its field of fractions -/
@[coe]
def coePolynomial (P : Polynomial K) : RatFunc K := algebraMap _ _ P
instance : Coe (Polynomial K) (RatFunc K) := ⟨coePolynomial⟩
theorem mk_one (x : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk x 1 = algebraMap _ _ x :=
rfl
theorem ofFractionRing_algebraMap (x : K[X]) :
ofFractionRing (algebraMap _ (FractionRing K[X]) x) = algebraMap _ _ x := by
rw [← mk_one, mk_one']
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_div (p q : K[X]) : RatFunc.mk p q = algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q := by
simp only [mk_eq_div', ofFractionRing_div, ofFractionRing_algebraMap]
@[simp]
theorem div_smul {R} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R K[X]] [IsScalarTower R K[X] K[X]] (c : R)
(p q : K[X]) :
algebraMap _ (RatFunc K) (c • p) / algebraMap _ _ q =
c • (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) := by
rw [← mk_eq_div, mk_smul, mk_eq_div]
theorem algebraMap_apply {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R K[X]] (x : R) :
algebraMap R (RatFunc K) x = algebraMap _ _ (algebraMap R K[X] x) / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by
rw [← mk_eq_div]
rfl
theorem map_apply_div_ne_zero {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
have hq' : φ q ≠ 0 := nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hφ (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr hq))
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq, map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk,
mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq']
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_div {R F : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[FunLike F K[X] R[X]] [MonoidWithZeroHomClass F K[X] R[X]]
(φ : F) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ R[X]⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
map φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (φ p) / algebraMap _ _ (φ q) := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· have : (0 : RatFunc K) = algebraMap K[X] _ 0 / algebraMap K[X] _ 1 := by simp
rw [map_zero, map_zero, map_zero, div_zero, div_zero, this, map_apply_div_ne_zero, map_one,
map_one, div_one, map_zero, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero
exact map_apply_div_ne_zero _ _ _ _ hq
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q := by
rcases eq_or_ne q 0 with (rfl | hq)
· simp only [div_zero, map_zero]
simp only [← mk_eq_div, mk_eq_localization_mk _ hq,
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_ofFractionRing_mk]
@[simp]
theorem liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [CommGroupWithZero L]
(φ : MonoidWithZeroHom K[X] L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ) (p q : K[X]) :
liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftMonoidWithZeroHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q := by
rw [← map_div₀, liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) = φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div _ hφ _ _
@[simp]
theorem liftRingHom_apply_div' {L : Type*} [Field L] (φ : K[X] →+* L) (hφ : K[X]⁰ ≤ L⁰.comap φ)
(p q : K[X]) : liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ p) / liftRingHom φ hφ (algebraMap _ _ q) =
φ p / φ q :=
liftMonoidWithZeroHom_apply_div' _ hφ _ _
variable (K)
theorem ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap :
ofFractionRing ∘ algebraMap K[X] (FractionRing K[X]) = algebraMap _ _ :=
funext ofFractionRing_algebraMap
theorem algebraMap_injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)) := by
rw [← ofFractionRing_comp_algebraMap]
exact ofFractionRing_injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
| variable {K}
section LiftAlgHom
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Basic.lean | 601 | 603 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
| obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 198 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right', add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a - p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a - p) b = toIocMod hp a b - p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b - c) = toIcoMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIocMod_sub_eq_sub (a b c : α) : toIocMod hp a (b - c) = toIocMod hp (a + c) b - c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_right_comm]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a (b + c) = toIcoMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIocMod_add_right_eq_add (a b c : α) :
toIocMod hp a (b + c) = toIocMod hp (a - c) b + c := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', sub_add_eq_add_sub]
theorem toIcoMod_neg (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (-b) = p - toIocMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIcoMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (-a) b = p - toIocMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocMod_neg (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (-b) = p - toIcoMod hp (-a) b := by
simp_rw [toIocMod, toIcoMod, toIocDiv_neg, neg_smul, add_smul]
abel
theorem toIocMod_neg' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (-a) b = p - toIcoMod hp a (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocMod_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a c - toIcoDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIcoMod_zsmul_add]
theorem toIocMod_eq_toIocMod : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a c ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, c - b = n • p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a c - toIocDiv hp a b, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· conv_lhs => rw [← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a b, ← toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp a c]
rw [h, sub_smul]
abel
· rcases h with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hz
rw [hz, toIocMod_zsmul_add]
/-! ### Links between the `Ico` and `Ioc` variants applied to the same element -/
section IcoIoc
namespace AddCommGroup
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = a :=
modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [toIcoMod_add_zsmul, toIcoMod_apply_left], fun h => ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, eq_add_of_sub_eq h⟩⟩
theorem modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIocMod hp a b = a + p := by
refine modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul.trans ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨toIocDiv hp a b + 1, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩
rw [toIocMod_add_zsmul, toIocMod_apply_left]
· rwa [add_one_zsmul, add_left_comm, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_left, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left
alias ⟨ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_right, _⟩ := modEq_iff_toIocMod_eq_right
variable (a b)
open List in
theorem tfae_modEq :
TFAE
[a ≡ b [PMOD p], ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p), toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b,
toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b] := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_not]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).trans
((toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2 ⟨Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self hi, i, (sub_add_cancel b _).symm⟩).symm
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
rw [← h, Ne, eq_comm, add_eq_left]
exact hp.ne'
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [h, eq_comm, toIocMod_eq_iff, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
refine ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right a hp, toIcoDiv hp a b - 1, ?_⟩
rw [sub_one_zsmul, add_add_add_comm, add_neg_cancel, add_zero]
conv_lhs => rw [← toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul hp a b, h]
tfae_have 2 → 1 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_imp_comm]
have h' := toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b
exact fun h => ⟨_, h'.1.lt_of_ne' h, h'.2⟩
tfae_finish
variable {a b}
theorem modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b - z • p ∉ Set.Ioo a (a + p) :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 1
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b ≠ toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 2
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b + p = toIocMod hp a b :=
(tfae_modEq hp a b).out 0 3
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b :=
(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_ne_toIocMod _).not_left
theorem not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_right_inj,
zsmul_left_inj hp]
theorem modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one :
a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ toIcoDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [modEq_iff_toIcoMod_add_period_eq_toIocMod hp, toIcoMod, toIocMod, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
sub_sub, sub_right_inj, ← add_one_zsmul, zsmul_left_inj hp]
end AddCommGroup
open AddCommGroup
/-- If `a` and `b` fall within the same cycle WRT `c`, then they are congruent modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_inj {c : α} : toIcoMod hp c a = toIcoMod hp c b ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp_rw [toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod, modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
alias ⟨_, AddCommGroup.ModEq.toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod⟩ := toIcoMod_inj
theorem Ico_eq_locus_Ioc_eq_iUnion_Ioo :
{ b | toIcoMod hp a b = toIocMod hp a b } = ⋃ z : ℤ, Set.Ioo (a + z • p) (a + p + z • p) := by
ext1
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_iUnion, ← Set.sub_mem_Ioo_iff_left, ←
not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod, modEq_iff_not_forall_mem_Ioo_mod hp, not_forall,
Classical.not_not]
theorem toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b ⩿ toIcoDiv hp a b := by
suffices toIocDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b ∨ toIocDiv hp a b + 1 = toIcoDiv hp a b by
rwa [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, ← Order.succ_eq_iff_covBy]
rw [eq_comm, ← not_modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv, eq_comm, ←
modEq_iff_toIcoDiv_eq_toIocDiv_add_one]
exact em' _
theorem toIcoMod_le_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact zsmul_left_mono hp.le (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le
theorem toIocMod_le_toIcoMod_add (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIocMod, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left, sub_le_iff_le_add, ← add_one_zsmul,
(zsmul_left_strictMono hp).le_iff_le]
apply (toIocDiv_wcovBy_toIcoDiv _ _ _).le_succ
end IcoIoc
open AddCommGroup
theorem toIcoMod_eq_self : toIcoMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_eq_self : toIocMod hp a b = b ↔ b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff, and_iff_left]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIcoMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIcoMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIcoMod_eq_toIcoMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIocMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIocMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIocDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIocMod hp a₂ b⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toIcoMod (a₁ a₂ b : α) : toIocMod hp a₁ (toIcoMod hp a₂ b) = toIocMod hp a₁ b :=
(toIocMod_eq_toIocMod _).2 ⟨toIcoDiv hp a₂ b, self_sub_toIcoMod hp a₂ b⟩
theorem toIcoMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIcoMod hp a) p :=
toIcoMod_add_right hp a
theorem toIocMod_periodic (a : α) : Function.Periodic (toIocMod hp a) p :=
toIocMod_add_right hp a
-- helper lemmas for when `a = 0`
section Zero
theorem toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIcoMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIocMod_zero_sub_comm (a b : α) : toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) = p - toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [← neg_sub, toIocMod_neg, neg_zero]
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = toIcoDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIocDiv_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = toIocDiv hp 0 (b - a) := by
rw [toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, zero_add]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b = toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) + a := by
rw [toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIocMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [toIcoMod_zero_sub_comm, sub_add_cancel]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIcoMod_zero (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp 0 (a - b) + toIcoMod hp 0 (b - a) = p := by
rw [_root_.add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero]
end Zero
/-- `toIcoMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ico a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIcoMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIcoMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIcoMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIcoMod hp a b, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIcoMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIcoMod hp a 0, toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `toIocMod` as an equiv from the quotient. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod (a : α) : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p ≃ Set.Ioc a (a + p) where
toFun b :=
⟨(toIocMod_periodic hp a).lift b, QuotientAddGroup.induction_on b <| toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a⟩
invFun := (↑)
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| (toIocMod_eq_self hp).mpr b.prop
left_inv b := by
induction b using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
dsimp
rw [QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, toIocMod_sub_self]
apply AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem_zmultiples
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_coe (a b : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a ↑b = ⟨toIocMod hp a b, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod_zero (a : α) :
QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod hp a 0 = ⟨toIocMod hp a 0, toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a _⟩ :=
rfl
end
/-!
### The circular order structure on `α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p`
-/
section Circular
open AddCommGroup
private theorem toIxxMod_iff (x₁ x₂ x₃ : α) : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp 0 (x₂ - x₁) + toIcoMod hp 0 (x₁ - x₃) ≤ p := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_sub, toIocMod_eq_sub _ x₁, add_le_add_iff_right, ← neg_sub x₁ x₃, toIocMod_neg,
neg_zero, le_sub_iff_add_le]
private theorem toIxxMod_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} (h : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃) :
toIcoMod hp x₂ x₃ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₁ := by
let x₂' := toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂
let x₃' := toIcoMod hp x₂' x₃
have h : x₂' ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' := by simpa [x₃']
have h₂₁ : x₂' < x₁ + p := toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _
have h₃₂ : x₃' - p < x₂' := sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (toIcoMod_lt_right _ _ _)
suffices hequiv : x₃' ≤ toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ by
obtain ⟨z, hd⟩ : ∃ z : ℤ, x₂ = x₂' + z • p := ((toIcoMod_eq_iff hp).1 rfl).2
simpa [hd, toIocMod_add_zsmul', toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_le_add_iff_right]
rcases le_or_lt x₃' (x₁ + p) with h₃₁ | h₁₃
· suffices hIoc₂₁ : toIocMod hp x₂' x₁ = x₁ + p from hIoc₂₁.symm.trans_ge h₃₁
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨h₂₁, by simp [x₂', left_le_toIcoMod]⟩, -1, by simp⟩
have hIoc₁₃ : toIocMod hp x₁ x₃' = x₃' - p := by
apply (toIocMod_eq_iff hp).2
exact ⟨⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 h₁₃, le_of_lt (h₃₂.trans h₂₁)⟩, 1, by simp⟩
have not_h₃₂ := (h.trans hIoc₁₃.le).not_lt
contradiction
private theorem toIxxMod_antisymm (h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c)
(h₁₃₂ : toIcoMod hp a c ≤ toIocMod hp a b) :
b ≡ a [PMOD p] ∨ c ≡ b [PMOD p] ∨ a ≡ c [PMOD p] := by
by_contra! h
rw [modEq_comm] at h
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.2.2] at h₁₂₃
rw [← (not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).mp h.1] at h₁₃₂
exact h.2.1 ((toIcoMod_inj _).1 <| h₁₃₂.antisymm h₁₂₃)
private theorem toIxxMod_total' (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp b a ≤ toIocMod hp b c ∨ toIcoMod hp b c ≤ toIocMod hp b a := by
/- an essential ingredient is the lemma saying {a-b} + {b-a} = period if a ≠ b (and = 0 if a = b).
Thus if a ≠ b and b ≠ c then ({a-b} + {b-c}) + ({c-b} + {b-a}) = 2 * period, so one of
`{a-b} + {b-c}` and `{c-b} + {b-a}` must be `≤ period` -/
have := congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp a b) (toIcoMod_add_toIocMod_zero hp c b)
simp only [add_add_add_comm] at this
rw [_root_.add_comm (toIocMod _ _ _), add_add_add_comm, ← two_nsmul] at this
replace := min_le_of_add_le_two_nsmul this.le
rw [min_le_iff] at this
rw [toIxxMod_iff, toIxxMod_iff]
refine this.imp (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _) (le_trans <| add_le_add_left ?_ _)
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
· apply toIcoMod_le_toIocMod
private theorem toIxxMod_total (a b c : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b ≤ toIocMod hp a c ∨ toIcoMod hp c b ≤ toIocMod hp c a :=
(toIxxMod_total' _ _ _ _).imp_right <| toIxxMod_cyclic_left _
private theorem toIxxMod_trans {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : α}
(h₁₂₃ : toIcoMod hp x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁)
(h₂₃₄ : toIcoMod hp x₂ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₂ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₂) :
toIcoMod hp x₁ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₁ x₃ ∧ ¬toIcoMod hp x₃ x₄ ≤ toIocMod hp x₃ x₁ := by
constructor
· suffices h : ¬x₃ ≡ x₂ [PMOD p] by
have h₁₂₃' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₁₂₃.1)
have h₂₃₄' := toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h₂₃₄.1)
rw [(not_modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_toIocMod hp).1 h] at h₂₃₄'
exact toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ (h₁₂₃'.trans h₂₃₄')
by_contra h
rw [(modEq_iff_toIcoMod_eq_left hp).1 h] at h₁₂₃
exact h₁₂₃.2 (left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _).le
· rw [not_le] at h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄ ⊢
exact (h₁₂₃.2.trans_le (toIcoMod_le_toIocMod _ x₃ x₂)).trans h₂₃₄.2
namespace QuotientAddGroup
variable [hp' : Fact (0 < p)]
instance : Btw (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) where
btw x₁ x₂ x₃ := (equivIcoMod hp'.out 0 (x₂ - x₁) : α) ≤ equivIocMod hp'.out 0 (x₃ - x₁)
theorem btw_coe_iff' {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} :
Btw.btw (x₁ : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) x₂ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp'.out 0 (x₂ - x₁) ≤ toIocMod hp'.out 0 (x₃ - x₁) :=
Iff.rfl
-- maybe harder to use than the primed one?
theorem btw_coe_iff {x₁ x₂ x₃ : α} :
Btw.btw (x₁ : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) x₂ x₃ ↔
toIcoMod hp'.out x₁ x₂ ≤ toIocMod hp'.out x₁ x₃ := by
rw [btw_coe_iff', toIocMod_sub_eq_sub, toIcoMod_sub_eq_sub, zero_add, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
instance circularPreorder : CircularPreorder (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) where
btw_refl x := show _ ≤ _ by simp [sub_self, hp'.out.le]
btw_cyclic_left {x₁ x₂ x₃} h := by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h ⊢
apply toIxxMod_cyclic_left _ h
sbtw := _
sbtw_iff_btw_not_btw := Iff.rfl
sbtw_trans_left {x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄} (h₁₂₃ : _ ∧ _) (h₂₃₄ : _ ∧ _) :=
show _ ∧ _ by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₄ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄ ⊢
apply toIxxMod_trans _ h₁₂₃ h₂₃₄
instance circularOrder : CircularOrder (α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.circularPreorder with
btw_antisymm := fun {x₁ x₂ x₃} h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁ => by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
rw [btw_cyclic] at h₃₂₁
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff] at h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁
simp_rw [← modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples]
exact toIxxMod_antisymm _ h₁₂₃ h₃₂₁
btw_total := fun x₁ x₂ x₃ => by
induction x₁ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₂ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
induction x₃ using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [btw_coe_iff]
apply toIxxMod_total }
end QuotientAddGroup
end Circular
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-!
### Connections to `Int.floor` and `Int.fract`
-/
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_floor (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b = ⌊(b - a) / p⌋ := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp ?_
rw [Set.mem_Ico, zsmul_eq_mul, ← sub_nonneg, add_comm, sub_right_comm, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add,
sub_right_comm _ _ a]
exact ⟨Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ hp, Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ hp⟩
theorem toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b = -⌊(a + p - b) / p⌋ := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp ?_
rw [Set.mem_Ioc, zsmul_eq_mul, Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add, ← sub_nonneg,
sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
refine ⟨?_, Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ hp⟩
rw [← add_lt_add_iff_right p, add_assoc, add_comm b, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, add_comm (_ * _), ←
sub_lt_iff_lt_add]
exact Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ hp
theorem toIcoDiv_zero_one (b : α) : toIcoDiv (zero_lt_one' α) 0 b = ⌊b⌋ := by
simp [toIcoDiv_eq_floor]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul (a b : α) :
toIcoMod hp a b = a + Int.fract ((b - a) / p) * p := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_eq_floor, Int.fract]
field_simp
ring
theorem toIcoMod_eq_fract_mul (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b = Int.fract (b / p) * p := by
simp [toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul]
theorem toIocMod_eq_sub_fract_mul (a b : α) :
toIocMod hp a b = a + p - Int.fract ((a + p - b) / p) * p := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor, Int.fract]
field_simp
ring
theorem toIcoMod_zero_one (b : α) : toIcoMod (zero_lt_one' α) 0 b = Int.fract b := by
simp [toIcoMod_eq_add_fract_mul]
end LinearOrderedField
/-! ### Lemmas about unions of translates of intervals -/
section Union
open Set Int
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p) (a : α)
include hp
theorem iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) = univ := by
refine eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun b => mem_iUnion.mpr ?_
rcases sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b with ⟨hl, hr⟩
refine ⟨toIocDiv hp a b, ⟨lt_sub_iff_add_lt.mp hl, ?_⟩⟩
rw [add_smul, one_smul, ← add_assoc]
convert sub_le_iff_le_add.mp hr using 1; abel
theorem iUnion_Ico_add_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) = univ := by
refine eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun b => mem_iUnion.mpr ?_
rcases sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b with ⟨hl, hr⟩
refine ⟨toIcoDiv hp a b, ⟨le_sub_iff_add_le.mp hl, ?_⟩⟩
rw [add_smul, one_smul, ← add_assoc]
convert sub_lt_iff_lt_add.mp hr using 1; abel
theorem iUnion_Icc_add_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul hp a, univ_subset_iff] using
iUnion_mono fun n : ℤ => (Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc (a + n • p) (a + (n + 1) • p) ⊆ Icc _ _)
theorem iUnion_Ioc_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (n • p) ((n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul hp 0
theorem iUnion_Ico_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (n • p) ((n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ico_add_zsmul hp 0
theorem iUnion_Icc_zsmul : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (n • p) ((n + 1) • p) = univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Icc_add_zsmul hp 0
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedRing
variable {α : Type*} [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] (a : α)
theorem iUnion_Ioc_add_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (a + n) (a + n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
iUnion_Ioc_add_zsmul zero_lt_one a
theorem iUnion_Ico_add_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (a + n) (a + n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
iUnion_Ico_add_zsmul zero_lt_one a
theorem iUnion_Icc_add_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (a + n) (a + n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zsmul_one, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, ← add_assoc] using
iUnion_Icc_add_zsmul zero_lt_one a
variable (α)
theorem iUnion_Ioc_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ioc (n : α) (n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ioc_add_intCast (0 : α)
theorem iUnion_Ico_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Ico (n : α) (n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Ico_add_intCast (0 : α)
theorem iUnion_Icc_intCast : ⋃ n : ℤ, Icc (n : α) (n + 1) = Set.univ := by
simpa only [zero_add] using iUnion_Icc_add_intCast (0 : α)
end LinearOrderedRing
end Union
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 1,009 | 1,016 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Sander Dahmen, Kim Morrison, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Free
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basis
/-!
# Rank of various constructions
## Main statements
- `rank_quotient_add_rank_le` : `rank M/N + rank N ≤ rank M`.
- `lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod`: `rank M × N ≤ rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_span_le_of_finite`: `rank (span s) ≤ #s` for finite `s`.
For free modules, we have
- `rank_prod` : `rank M × N = rank M + rank N`.
- `rank_finsupp` : `rank (ι →₀ M) = #ι * rank M`
- `rank_directSum`: `rank (⨁ Mᵢ) = ∑ rank Mᵢ`
- `rank_tensorProduct`: `rank (M ⊗ N) = rank M * rank N`.
Lemmas for ranks of submodules and subalgebras are also provided.
We have finrank variants for most lemmas as well.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u u' v v' u₁' w w'
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type u'} {M : Type v} {M' : Type v'} {M₁ : Type v}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Basis Cardinal DirectSum Function Module Set Submodule
section Quotient
variable [Ring R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M₁]
variable [Module R M]
theorem LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
{M' : Submodule R M} {ι₁ ι₂} {f : ι₁ → M'} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) (g : ι₂ → M)
(hg : LinearIndependent R (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := M') ∘ g)) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim (f · : ι₁ → M) g) := by
refine .sum_type (hf.map' M'.subtype M'.ker_subtype) (.of_comp M'.mkQ hg) ?_
refine disjoint_def.mpr fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
have : x ∈ M' := span_le.mpr (Set.range_subset_iff.mpr fun i ↦ (f i).prop) h₁
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp.mp h₂
simp_rw [← Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← mkQ_apply, map_finsuppSum, map_smul, mkQ_apply] at this
rw [linearIndependent_iff.mp hg _ this, Finsupp.sum_zero_index]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias LinearIndependent.sum_elim_of_quotient := LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_of_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t) : LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
apply hs.union ht.of_comp
convert (Submodule.range_ker_disjoint ht).symm
· simp
aesop
theorem LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient {M' : Submodule R M}
{s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ M') (hs' : LinearIndepOn R id s) {t : Set M}
(ht : LinearIndepOn R (mkQ M') t) : LinearIndepOn R id (s ∪ t) :=
hs'.union_of_quotient <| by
rw [image_id]
exact ht.of_comp ((span R s).mapQ M' (LinearMap.id) (span_le.2 hs))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias LinearIndependent.union_of_quotient :=
LinearIndepOn.union_id_of_quotient
theorem linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) ↔
LinearIndepOn R f s ∧ LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.union_of_quotient h.2⟩
· exact h.mono subset_union_left
apply (h.mono subset_union_right).map
simpa [← image_eq_range] using ((linearIndepOn_union_iff hst).1 h).2.2.symm
theorem LinearIndepOn.quotient_iff_union {s t : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hs : LinearIndepOn R f s)
(hst : Disjoint s t) :
LinearIndepOn R (mkQ (span R (f '' s)) ∘ f) t ↔ LinearIndepOn R f (s ∪ t) := by
rw [linearIndepOn_union_iff_quotient hst, and_iff_right hs]
theorem rank_quotient_add_rank_le [Nontrivial R] (M' : Submodule R M) :
Module.rank R (M ⧸ M') + Module.rank R M' ≤ Module.rank R M := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R (M ⧸ M')
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M'
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
refine ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ ?_
choose f hf using Submodule.Quotient.mk_surjective M'
simpa [add_comm] using (LinearIndependent.sumElim_of_quotient ht (fun (i : s) ↦ f i)
(by simpa [Function.comp_def, hf] using hs)).cardinal_le_rank
theorem rank_quotient_le (p : Submodule R M) : Module.rank R (M ⧸ p) ≤ Module.rank R M :=
(mkQ p).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective
/-- The dimension of a quotient is bounded by the dimension of the ambient space. -/
theorem Submodule.finrank_quotient_le [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Finite R M]
(s : Submodule R M) : finrank R (M ⧸ s) ≤ finrank R M :=
toNat_le_toNat ((Submodule.mkQ s).rank_le_of_surjective Quot.mk_surjective)
(rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
end Quotient
variable [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
variable [Module R M]
section ULift
@[simp]
theorem rank_ulift : Module.rank R (ULift.{w} M) = Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) :=
Cardinal.lift_injective.{v} <| Eq.symm <| (lift_lift _).trans ULift.moduleEquiv.symm.lift_rank_eq
@[simp]
theorem finrank_ulift : finrank R (ULift M) = finrank R M := by
simp_rw [finrank, rank_ulift, toNat_lift]
end ULift
section Prod
variable (R M M')
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M']
theorem rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ ≤ Module.rank R (M × M₁) := by
conv_lhs => simp only [Module.rank_def]
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M
have := nonempty_linearIndependent_set R M₁
rw [Cardinal.ciSup_add_ciSup _ (bddAbove_range _) _ (bddAbove_range _)]
exact ciSup_le fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ↦ ciSup_le fun ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦
(linearIndependent_inl_union_inr' hs ht).cardinal_le_rank
theorem lift_rank_add_lift_rank_le_rank_prod [Nontrivial R] :
lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + lift.{v} (Module.rank R M') ≤ Module.rank R (M × M') := by
rw [← rank_ulift, ← rank_ulift]
exact (rank_add_rank_le_rank_prod R _).trans_eq
(ULift.moduleEquiv.prodCongr ULift.moduleEquiv).rank_eq
variable {R M M'}
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Free R M'] [Module.Free R M₁]
open Module.Free
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free, then the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M).lift + (Module.rank R M').lift`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_prod : Module.rank R (M × M') =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) + Cardinal.lift.{v, v'} (Module.rank R M') := by
simpa [rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M, rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R M', lift_umax]
using ((chooseBasis R M).prod (chooseBasis R M')).mk_eq_rank.symm
/-- If `M` and `M'` are free (and lie in the same universe), the rank of `M × M'` is
`(Module.rank R M) + (Module.rank R M')`. -/
theorem rank_prod' : Module.rank R (M × M₁) = Module.rank R M + Module.rank R M₁ := by simp
/-- The finrank of `M × M'` is `(finrank R M) + (finrank R M')`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Module.finrank_prod [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Finite R M'] :
finrank R (M × M') = finrank R M + finrank R M' := by
simp [finrank, rank_lt_aleph0 R M, rank_lt_aleph0 R M']
end Prod
section Finsupp
variable (R M M')
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M] [Module R M'] [Module.Free R M']
open Module.Free
@[simp]
theorem rank_finsupp (ι : Type w) :
Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #ι * Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, bs⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← bs.mk_eq_rank'', ← (Finsupp.basis fun _ : ι => bs).mk_eq_rank'', Cardinal.mk_sigma,
Cardinal.sum_const]
theorem rank_finsupp' (ι : Type v) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ M) = #ι * Module.rank R M := by
simp [rank_finsupp]
/-- The rank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `(#ι).lift`. -/
theorem rank_finsupp_self (ι : Type w) : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} #ι := by
simp
/-- If `R` and `ι` lie in the same universe, the rank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `# ι`. -/
theorem rank_finsupp_self' {ι : Type u} : Module.rank R (ι →₀ R) = #ι := by simp
/-- The rank of the direct sum is the sum of the ranks. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_directSum {ι : Type v} (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] :
Module.rank R (⨁ i, M i) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (M i) := by
let B i := chooseBasis R (M i)
let b : Basis _ R (⨁ i, M i) := DFinsupp.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite, the rank of `m × n` matrices over a module `M` is
`(#m).lift * (#n).lift * rank R M`. -/
@[simp]
theorem rank_matrix_module (m : Type w) (n : Type w') [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n M) =
lift.{max v w'} #m * lift.{max v w} #n * lift.{max w w'} (Module.rank R M) := by
cases nonempty_fintype m
cases nonempty_fintype n
obtain ⟨I, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
rw [← (b.matrix m n).mk_eq_rank'']
simp only [mk_prod, lift_mul, lift_lift, ← mul_assoc, b.mk_eq_rank'']
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe, the rank of `m × n` matrices over a
module `M` is `(#m * #n).lift * rank R M`. -/
@[simp high]
theorem rank_matrix_module' (m n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n M) =
lift.{max v} (#m * #n) * lift.{w} (Module.rank R M) := by
rw [rank_matrix_module, lift_mul, lift_umax.{w, v}]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite, the rank of `m × n` matrices is `(#m).lift * (#n).lift`. -/
theorem rank_matrix (m : Type v) (n : Type w) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) =
Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, v} #m * Cardinal.lift.{max v w u, w} #n := by
rw [rank_matrix_module, rank_self, lift_one, mul_one, ← lift_lift.{v, max u w}, lift_id,
← lift_lift.{w, max u v}, lift_id]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe, the rank of `m × n` matrices is
`(#n * #m).lift`. -/
theorem rank_matrix' (m n : Type v) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (#m * #n) := by
rw [rank_matrix, lift_mul, lift_umax.{v, u}]
/-- If `m` and `n` are finite and lie in the same universe as `R`, the rank of `m × n` matrices
is `# m * # n`. -/
theorem rank_matrix'' (m n : Type u) [Finite m] [Finite n] :
Module.rank R (Matrix m n R) = #m * #n := by simp
open Fintype
namespace Module
@[simp]
theorem finrank_finsupp {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ M) = card ι * finrank R M := by
rw [finrank, finrank, rank_finsupp, ← mk_toNat_eq_card, toNat_mul, toNat_lift, toNat_lift]
/-- The finrank of `(ι →₀ R)` is `Fintype.card ι`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finrank_finsupp_self {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] : finrank R (ι →₀ R) = card ι := by
rw [finrank, rank_finsupp_self, ← mk_toNat_eq_card, toNat_lift]
/-- The finrank of the direct sum is the sum of the finranks. -/
@[simp]
theorem finrank_directSum {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] (M : ι → Type w) [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i : ι, Module R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Free R (M i)] [∀ i : ι, Module.Finite R (M i)] :
finrank R (⨁ i, M i) = ∑ i, finrank R (M i) := by
letI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
simp only [finrank, fun i => rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex R (M i), rank_directSum, ← mk_sigma,
mk_toNat_eq_card, card_sigma]
/-- If `m` and `n` are `Fintype`, the finrank of `m × n` matrices over a module `M` is
`(Fintype.card m) * (Fintype.card n) * finrank R M`. -/
theorem finrank_matrix (m n : Type*) [Fintype m] [Fintype n] :
finrank R (Matrix m n M) = card m * card n * finrank R M := by simp [finrank]
end Module
end Finsupp
section Pi
variable [StrongRankCondition R] [Module.Free R M]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (φ i)] [∀ i, Module R (φ i)] [∀ i, Module.Free R (φ i)]
open Module.Free
open LinearMap
/-- The rank of a finite product of free modules is the sum of the ranks. -/
-- this result is not true without the freeness assumption
@[simp]
theorem rank_pi [Finite η] : Module.rank R (∀ i, φ i) =
Cardinal.sum fun i => Module.rank R (φ i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype η
let B i := chooseBasis R (φ i)
let b : Basis _ R (∀ i, φ i) := Pi.basis fun i => B i
simp [← b.mk_eq_rank'', fun i => (B i).mk_eq_rank'']
variable (R)
/-- The finrank of `(ι → R)` is `Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem Module.finrank_pi {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι] :
finrank R (ι → R) = Fintype.card ι := by
simp [finrank]
|
--TODO: this should follow from `LinearEquiv.finrank_eq`, that is over a field.
/-- The finrank of a finite product is the sum of the finranks. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Constructions.lean | 301 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.hasProd_iff := IsInducing.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.map_tprod [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] (hf : Multipliable f)
{G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
g (∏' i, f i) = ∏' i, g (f i) := (HasProd.tprod_eq (HasProd.map hf.hasProd g hg)).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma Topology.IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[T2Space γ] {G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable (g ∘ f) ∧ ∏' i, g (f i) ∈ Set.range g := by
constructor
· intro hf
constructor
· exact hf.map g hg.continuous
· use ∏' i, f i
exact hf.map_tprod g hg.continuous
· rintro ⟨hgf, a, ha⟩
use a
have := hgf.hasProd
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← ha] at this
exact (hg.hasProd_iff f a).mp this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range :=
IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range
/-- "A special case of `Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience" -/
@[to_additive "A special case of `Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience"]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_equiv [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[EquivLike G α γ] [MulEquivClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g)
(hg' : Continuous (EquivLike.inv g : γ → α)) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse g (g : α ≃* γ).symm hg hg' (EquivLike.left_inv g)
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Surjective.multipliable_iff_of_hasProd_iff {α' : Type*} [CommMonoid α']
[TopologicalSpace α'] {e : α' → α} (hes : Function.Surjective e) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, HasProd f (e a) ↔ HasProd g a) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
hes.exists.trans <| exists_congr <| @he
variable [ContinuousMul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul (hf : HasProd f a) (hg : HasProd g b) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b * g b) (a * b) := by
dsimp only [HasProd] at hf hg ⊢
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib]
exact hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b * g b :=
(hf.hasProd.mul hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : Finset γ} :
(∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f i) (a i)) → HasProd (fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [hasProd_one, prod_empty, forall_true_iff]) <| by
simp +contextual only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_iff,
prod_insert, and_imp]
exact fun x s _ IH hx h ↦ hx.mul (IH h)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_prod {f : γ → β → α} {s : Finset γ} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Multipliable (f i)) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b :=
(hasProd_prod fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_disjoint {s t : Set β} (hs : Disjoint s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (s ∪ t : Set β) → α) (a * b) := by
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Set.mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint hs]
exact ha.mul hb
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod_disjoint {ι} (s : Finset ι) {t : ι → Set β} {a : ι → α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t i → α) (a i)) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) → α) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
simp_rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion _ _ hs]
exact hasProd_prod hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_isCompl {s t : Set β} (hs : IsCompl s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) := by
simpa [← hs.compl_eq] using
(hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 ha).mul (hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 hb)
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_compl {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul_compl {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.mul_compl hsc.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.compl_mul {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl.symm hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.compl_add {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.compl_mul hsc.hasProd).multipliable
/-- Version of `HasProd.update` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`,
it gives a relationship between the products of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `HasSum.update` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist."]
theorem HasProd.update' {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a a' : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (x : α)
(hf' : HasProd (update f b x) a') : a * x = a' * f b := by
have : ∀ b', f b' * ite (b' = b) x 1 = update f b x b' * ite (b' = b) (f b) 1 := by
intro b'
split_ifs with hb'
· simpa only [Function.update_apply, hb', eq_self_iff_true] using mul_comm (f b) x
· simp only [Function.update_apply, hb', if_false]
have h := hf.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b x)
simp_rw [this] at h
exact HasProd.unique h (hf'.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b (f b)))
/-- Version of `hasProd_ite_div_hasProd` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`, it gives
a relationship between the products of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist."]
theorem eq_mul_of_hasProd_ite {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (a' : α)
(hf' : HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) a') : a = a' * f b := by
refine (mul_one a).symm.trans (hf.update' b 1 ?_)
convert hf'
apply update_apply
end HasProd
section tprod
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_set_coe (f : β → α) {s t : Set β} (h : s = t) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x : t, f x := by rw [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_subtype (f : β → α) {P Q : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) :
∏' x : {x // P x}, f x = ∏' x : {x // Q x}, f x :=
tprod_congr_set_coe f <| Set.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_finprod (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ᶠ b, f b := by simp [tprod_def, multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport hf, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod' {s : Finset β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_finprod (s.finite_toSet.subset hf), finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod {s : Finset β} (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b :=
tprod_eq_prod' <| mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_one : ∏' _ : β, (1 : α) = 1 := by rw [tprod_eq_finprod] <;> simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_empty [IsEmpty β] : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := (∅ : Finset β))] <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr {f g : β → α}
(hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∏' b, f b = ∏' b, g b :=
congr_arg tprod (funext hfg)
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_fintype [Fintype β] (f : β → α) : ∏' b, f b = ∏ b, f b := by
apply tprod_eq_prod; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_tprod_mulIndicator (f : β → α) (s : Finset β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏' x, Set.mulIndicator (↑s) f x := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod' (Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset),
Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset _ Finset.Subset.rfl]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_bool (f : Bool → α) : ∏' i : Bool, f i = f false * f true := by
rw [tprod_fintype, Fintype.prod_bool, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_mulSingle {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' = 1) :
∏' b, f b = f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := {b}), prod_singleton]
exact fun b' hb' ↦ hf b' (by simpa using hb')
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_tprod_eq_mulSingle (f : β → γ → α) (b : β) (c : γ) (hfb : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' c = 1)
(hfc : ∀ b', ∀ c' ≠ c, f b' c' = 1) : ∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = f b c :=
calc
∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = ∏' b', f b' c := tprod_congr fun b' ↦ tprod_eq_mulSingle _ (hfc b')
_ = f b c := tprod_eq_mulSingle _ hfb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
∏' b', (if b' = b then a else 1) = a := by
rw [tprod_eq_mulSingle b]
· simp
· intro b' hb'; simp [hb']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : { x // x ∈ s }, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← prod_attach]; exact tprod_fintype _
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype' (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : (s : Set β), f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_singleton (b : β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : ({b} : Set β), f x = f b := by
rw [← coe_singleton, Finset.tprod_subtype', prod_singleton]
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.tprod_eq {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) {f : β → α}
(hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range g) : ∏' c, f (g c) = ∏' b, f b := by
have : mulSupport f = g '' mulSupport (f ∘ g) := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff.2 hf]
rw [← Function.comp_def]
by_cases hf_fin : (mulSupport f).Finite
· have hfg_fin : (mulSupport (f ∘ g)).Finite := hf_fin.preimage hg.injOn
lift g to γ ↪ β using hg
simp_rw [tprod_eq_prod' hf_fin.coe_toFinset.ge, tprod_eq_prod' hfg_fin.coe_toFinset.ge,
comp_apply, ← Finset.prod_map]
refine Finset.prod_congr (Finset.coe_injective ?_) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
simp [this]
· have hf_fin' : ¬ Set.Finite (mulSupport (f ∘ g)) := by
rwa [this, Set.finite_image_iff hg.injOn] at hf_fin
simp_rw [tprod_def, if_neg hf_fin, if_neg hf_fin', Multipliable,
funext fun a => propext <| hg.hasProd_iff (mulSupport_subset_iff'.1 hf) (a := a)]
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.tprod_eq (e : γ ≃ β) (f : β → α) : ∏' c, f (e c) = ∏' b, f b :=
e.injective.tprod_eq <| by simp
/-! ### `tprod` on subsets - part 1 -/
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
Subtype.val_injective.tprod_eq <| by simpa
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype_mulSupport (f : β → α) : ∏' x : mulSupport f, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset Set.Subset.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype (s : Set β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x, s.mulIndicator f x := by
rw [← tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset, tprod_congr]
| simp
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 479 | 480 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
/-!
# Properties of addition, multiplication and subtraction on extended non-negative real numbers
In this file we prove elementary properties of algebraic operations on `ℝ≥0∞`, including addition,
multiplication, natural powers and truncated subtraction, as well as how these interact with the
order structure on `ℝ≥0∞`. Notably excluded from this list are inversion and division, the
definitions and properties of which can be found in `Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv`.
Note: the definitions of the operations included in this file can be found in
`Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
section Mul
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem mul_lt_mul (ac : a < c) (bd : b < d) : a * b < c * d := WithTop.mul_lt_mul ac bd
protected lemma pow_right_strictMono {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : StrictMono fun a : ℝ≥0∞ ↦ a ^ n :=
WithTop.pow_right_strictMono hn
@[gcongr] protected lemma pow_lt_pow_left (hab : a < b) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n < b ^ n :=
WithTop.pow_lt_pow_left hab hn
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
theorem mul_left_strictMono (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hinf : a ≠ ∞) : StrictMono (a * ·) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using hinf
rw [coe_ne_zero] at h0
intro x y h
contrapose! h
simpa only [← mul_assoc, ← coe_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ h0, coe_one, one_mul]
using mul_le_mul_left' h (↑a⁻¹)
@[gcongr] protected theorem mul_lt_mul_left' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hinf : a ≠ ⊤) (bc : b < c) :
a * b < a * c :=
ENNReal.mul_left_strictMono h0 hinf bc
@[gcongr] protected theorem mul_lt_mul_right' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hinf : a ≠ ⊤) (bc : b < c) :
b * a < c * a :=
mul_comm b a ▸ mul_comm c a ▸ ENNReal.mul_left_strictMono h0 hinf bc
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
protected theorem mul_right_inj (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hinf : a ≠ ∞) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_left_strictMono h0 hinf).injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")]
alias mul_eq_mul_left := ENNReal.mul_right_inj
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
protected theorem mul_left_inj (h0 : c ≠ 0) (hinf : c ≠ ∞) : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ ENNReal.mul_right_inj h0 hinf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")]
alias mul_eq_mul_right := ENNReal.mul_left_inj
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
theorem mul_le_mul_left (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hinf : a ≠ ∞) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_left_strictMono h0 hinf).le_iff_le
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
theorem mul_le_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c ≤ b * c ↔ a ≤ b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_le_mul_left
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
theorem mul_lt_mul_left (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hinf : a ≠ ∞) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_left_strictMono h0 hinf).lt_iff_lt
-- TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
theorem mul_lt_mul_right : c ≠ 0 → c ≠ ∞ → (a * c < b * c ↔ a < b) :=
mul_comm c a ▸ mul_comm c b ▸ mul_lt_mul_left
protected lemma mul_eq_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := by
simpa using ENNReal.mul_right_inj ha₀ ha (c := 1)
protected lemma mul_eq_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := by
simpa using ENNReal.mul_left_inj hb₀ hb (b := 1)
end Mul
section OperationsAndOrder
protected theorem pow_pos : 0 < a → ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < a ^ n :=
CanonicallyOrderedAdd.pow_pos
protected theorem pow_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using ENNReal.pow_pos
theorem not_lt_zero : ¬a < 0 := by simp
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left : a ≠ ∞ → a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c :=
WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_left
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_right : a ≠ ∞ → b + a ≤ c + a → b ≤ c :=
WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right
@[gcongr] protected theorem add_lt_add_left : a ≠ ∞ → b < c → a + b < a + c :=
WithTop.add_lt_add_left
@[gcongr] protected theorem add_lt_add_right : a ≠ ∞ → b < c → b + a < c + a :=
WithTop.add_lt_add_right
protected theorem add_le_add_iff_left : a ≠ ∞ → (a + b ≤ a + c ↔ b ≤ c) :=
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_left
protected theorem add_le_add_iff_right : a ≠ ∞ → (b + a ≤ c + a ↔ b ≤ c) :=
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left : a ≠ ∞ → (a + b < a + c ↔ b < c) :=
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_left
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right : a ≠ ∞ → (b + a < c + a ↔ b < c) :=
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt : a ≠ ∞ → a ≤ b → c < d → a + c < b + d :=
WithTop.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le : c ≠ ∞ → a < b → c ≤ d → a + c < b + d :=
WithTop.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
instance addLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT ℝ≥0∞ :=
WithTop.addLeftReflectLT
theorem lt_add_right (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a < a + b := by
rwa [← pos_iff_ne_zero, ← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left ha, add_zero] at hb
end OperationsAndOrder
section OperationsAndInfty
variable {α : Type*} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem add_eq_top : a + b = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ ∨ b = ∞ := WithTop.add_eq_top
@[simp] theorem add_lt_top : a + b < ∞ ↔ a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞ := WithTop.add_lt_top
theorem toNNReal_add {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : r₁ ≠ ∞) (h₂ : r₂ ≠ ∞) :
(r₁ + r₂).toNNReal = r₁.toNNReal + r₂.toNNReal := by
lift r₁ to ℝ≥0 using h₁
lift r₂ to ℝ≥0 using h₂
rfl
/-- If `a ≤ b + c` and `a = ∞` whenever `b = ∞` or `c = ∞`, then
`ENNReal.toReal a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b + ENNReal.toReal c`. This lemma is useful to transfer
triangle-like inequalities from `ENNReal`s to `Real`s. -/
theorem toReal_le_add' (hle : a ≤ b + c) (hb : b = ∞ → a = ∞) (hc : c = ∞ → a = ∞) :
a.toReal ≤ b.toReal + c.toReal := by
refine le_trans (toReal_mono' hle ?_) toReal_add_le
simpa only [add_eq_top, or_imp] using And.intro hb hc
/-- If `a ≤ b + c`, `b ≠ ∞`, and `c ≠ ∞`, then
`ENNReal.toReal a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b + ENNReal.toReal c`. This lemma is useful to transfer
triangle-like inequalities from `ENNReal`s to `Real`s. -/
theorem toReal_le_add (hle : a ≤ b + c) (hb : b ≠ ∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
a.toReal ≤ b.toReal + c.toReal :=
toReal_le_add' hle (flip absurd hb) (flip absurd hc)
theorem not_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : ¬x < ∞ ↔ x = ∞ := by rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Classical.not_not]
theorem add_ne_top : a + b ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using add_lt_top
@[aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
protected lemma Finiteness.add_ne_top {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a + b ≠ ∞ :=
ENNReal.add_ne_top.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mul_top' : a * ∞ = if a = 0 then 0 else ∞ := by convert WithTop.mul_top' a
@[simp] theorem mul_top (h : a ≠ 0) : a * ∞ = ∞ := WithTop.mul_top h
theorem top_mul' : ∞ * a = if a = 0 then 0 else ∞ := by convert WithTop.top_mul' a
@[simp] theorem top_mul (h : a ≠ 0) : ∞ * a = ∞ := WithTop.top_mul h
theorem top_mul_top : ∞ * ∞ = ∞ := WithTop.top_mul_top
theorem mul_eq_top : a * b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ∞ ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
WithTop.mul_eq_top_iff
theorem mul_lt_top : a < ∞ → b < ∞ → a * b < ∞ := WithTop.mul_lt_top
-- This is unsafe because we could have `a = ∞` and `b = 0` or vice-versa
@[aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) unsafe 75% apply]
theorem mul_ne_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b ≠ ∞ := WithTop.mul_ne_top
theorem lt_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a < ∞ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 fun ha => h <| mul_eq_top.2 (Or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩)
theorem lt_top_of_mul_ne_top_right (h : a * b ≠ ∞) (ha : a ≠ 0) : b < ∞ :=
lt_top_of_mul_ne_top_left (by rwa [mul_comm]) ha
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Operations.lean | 203 | 203 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condExp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condExp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
variable (E) in
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condExp_zero]; simp⟩
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
theorem condExp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_eq := condExp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condExp.congr (hf.condExp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condExp (ℱ.le i) (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condExp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j) _).trans
((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
theorem neg (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, fun i j hij => (condExp_neg ..).trans (hf.2 i j hij).neg⟩
theorem sub (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
theorem smul (c : ℝ) (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
refine (condExp_smul ..).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
theorem supermartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Supermartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
theorem submartingale [Preorder E] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.1, fun i j hij => (hf.2 i j hij).symm.le, fun i => hf.integrable i⟩
end Martingale
theorem martingale_iff [PartialOrder E] :
Martingale f ℱ μ ↔ Supermartingale f ℱ μ ∧ Submartingale f ℱ μ :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.supermartingale, hf.submartingale⟩, fun ⟨hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨hf₁.1, fun i j hij => (hf₁.2.1 i j hij).antisymm (hf₂.2.1 i j hij)⟩⟩
theorem martingale_condExp (f : Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω)
| [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] : Martingale (fun i => μ[f|ℱ i]) ℱ μ :=
⟨fun _ => stronglyMeasurable_condExp, fun _ j hij => condExp_condExp_of_le (ℱ.mono hij) (ℱ.le j)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias martingale_condexp := martingale_condExp
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 132 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov, Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2
/-!
# Simple graphs
This module defines simple graphs on a vertex type `V` as an irreflexive symmetric relation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph` is a structure for symmetric, irreflexive relations.
* `SimpleGraph.neighborSet` is the `Set` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex.
* `SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors` is the intersection of the neighbor sets of two given vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceSet` is the `Set` of edges containing a given vertex.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` instance: Under the subgraph relation, `SimpleGraph` forms a
`CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`. In other words, this is the complete lattice of spanning subgraphs
of the complete graph.
## TODO
* This is the simplest notion of an unoriented graph.
This should eventually fit into a more complete combinatorics hierarchy which includes
multigraphs and directed graphs.
We begin with simple graphs in order to start learning what the combinatorics hierarchy should
look like.
-/
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Symmetric
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Irreflexive
/--
A variant of the `aesop` tactic for use in the graph library. Changes relative
to standard `aesop`:
- We use the `SimpleGraph` rule set in addition to the default rule sets.
- We instruct Aesop's `intro` rule to unfold with `default` transparency.
- We instruct Aesop to fail if it can't fully solve the goal. This allows us to
use `aesop_graph` for auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph) "aesop_graph" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
Use `aesop_graph?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_graph`
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph?) "aesop_graph?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop? $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_graph` which does not fail if it is unable to solve the goal.
Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal Aesop is even worse than nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph_nonterminal) "aesop_graph_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
open Finset Function
universe u v w
/-- A simple graph is an irreflexive symmetric relation `Adj` on a vertex type `V`.
The relation describes which pairs of vertices are adjacent.
There is exactly one edge for every pair of adjacent vertices;
see `SimpleGraph.edgeSet` for the corresponding edge set.
-/
@[ext, aesop safe constructors (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])]
structure SimpleGraph (V : Type u) where
/-- The adjacency relation of a simple graph. -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph
loopless : Irreflexive Adj := by aesop_graph
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph (Adj → adj)
/-- Constructor for simple graphs using a symmetric irreflexive boolean function. -/
@[simps]
def SimpleGraph.mk' {V : Type u} :
{adj : V → V → Bool // (∀ x y, adj x y = adj y x) ∧ (∀ x, ¬ adj x x)} ↪ SimpleGraph V where
toFun x := ⟨fun v w ↦ x.1 v w, fun v w ↦ by simp [x.2.1], fun v ↦ by simp [x.2.2]⟩
inj' := by
rintro ⟨adj, _⟩ ⟨adj', _⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
intro h
funext v w
simpa [Bool.coe_iff_coe] using congr_fun₂ h v w
/-- We can enumerate simple graphs by enumerating all functions `V → V → Bool`
and filtering on whether they are symmetric and irreflexive. -/
instance {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (SimpleGraph V) where
elems := Finset.univ.map SimpleGraph.mk'
complete := by
classical
rintro ⟨Adj, hs, hi⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_univ, true_and, Subtype.exists, Bool.not_eq_true]
refine ⟨fun v w ↦ Adj v w, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp [hs.iff]
· intro v; simp [hi v]
· ext
simp
/-- There are finitely many simple graphs on a given finite type. -/
instance SimpleGraph.instFinite {V : Type u} [Finite V] : Finite (SimpleGraph V) :=
.of_injective SimpleGraph.Adj fun _ _ ↦ SimpleGraph.ext
/-- Construct the simple graph induced by the given relation. It
symmetrizes the relation and makes it irreflexive. -/
def SimpleGraph.fromRel {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj a b := a ≠ b ∧ (r a b ∨ r b a)
symm := fun _ _ ⟨hn, hr⟩ => ⟨hn.symm, hr.symm⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn rfl
@[simp]
theorem SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) (v w : V) :
(SimpleGraph.fromRel r).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ (r v w ∨ r w v) :=
Iff.rfl
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.symm
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.irrefl
/-- The complete graph on a type `V` is the simple graph with all pairs of distinct vertices
adjacent. In `Mathlib`, this is usually referred to as `⊤`. -/
def completeGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj := Ne
/-- The graph with no edges on a given vertex type `V`. `Mathlib` prefers the notation `⊥`. -/
def emptyGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj _ _ := False
/-- Two vertices are adjacent in the complete bipartite graph on two vertex types
if and only if they are not from the same side.
Any bipartite graph may be regarded as a subgraph of one of these. -/
@[simps]
def completeBipartiteGraph (V W : Type*) : SimpleGraph (V ⊕ W) where
Adj v w := v.isLeft ∧ w.isRight ∨ v.isRight ∧ w.isLeft
symm v w := by cases v <;> cases w <;> simp
loopless v := by cases v <;> simp
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {a b c u v w : V} {e : Sym2 V}
@[simp]
protected theorem irrefl {v : V} : ¬G.Adj v v :=
G.loopless v
theorem adj_comm (u v : V) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj v u :=
⟨fun x => G.symm x, fun x => G.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
theorem Adj.symm {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
theorem ne_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b := by
rintro rfl
exact G.irrefl h
protected theorem Adj.ne {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b :=
G.ne_of_adj h
protected theorem Adj.ne' {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : b ≠ a :=
h.ne.symm
theorem ne_of_adj_of_not_adj {v w x : V} (h : G.Adj v x) (hn : ¬G.Adj w x) : v ≠ w := fun h' =>
hn (h' ▸ h)
theorem adj_injective : Injective (Adj : SimpleGraph V → V → V → Prop) :=
fun _ _ => SimpleGraph.ext
@[simp]
theorem adj_inj {G H : SimpleGraph V} : G.Adj = H.Adj ↔ G = H :=
adj_injective.eq_iff
theorem adj_congr_of_sym2 {u v w x : V} (h : s(u, v) = s(w, x)) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj w x := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h
rcases h with hl | hr
· rw [hl.1, hl.2]
· rw [hr.1, hr.2, adj_comm]
section Order
/-- The relation that one `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another.
Note that this should be spelled `≤`. -/
def IsSubgraph (x y : SimpleGraph V) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w
instance : LE (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨IsSubgraph⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSubgraph_eq_le : (IsSubgraph : SimpleGraph V → SimpleGraph V → Prop) = (· ≤ ·) :=
rfl
/-- The supremum of two graphs `x ⊔ y` has edges where either `x` or `y` have edges. -/
instance : Max (SimpleGraph V) where
max x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊔ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.sup_apply, Pi.sup_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊔ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∨ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of two graphs `x ⊓ y` has edges where both `x` and `y` have edges. -/
instance : Min (SimpleGraph V) where
min x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊓ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.inf_apply, Pi.inf_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊓ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
/-- We define `Gᶜ` to be the `SimpleGraph V` such that no two adjacent vertices in `G`
are adjacent in the complement, and every nonadjacent pair of vertices is adjacent
(still ensuring that vertices are not adjacent to themselves). -/
instance hasCompl : HasCompl (SimpleGraph V) where
compl G :=
{ Adj := fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
symm := fun v w ⟨hne, _⟩ => ⟨hne.symm, by rwa [adj_comm]⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hne, _⟩ => (hne rfl).elim }
@[simp]
theorem compl_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : Gᶜ.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The difference of two graphs `x \ y` has the edges of `x` with the edges of `y` removed. -/
instance sdiff : SDiff (SimpleGraph V) where
sdiff x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj \ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by change x.Adj w v ∧ ¬y.Adj w v; rwa [x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x \ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ ¬y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
instance supSet : SupSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sSup s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b
symm := fun _ _ => Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right Adj.symm
loopless := by
rintro a ⟨G, _, ha⟩
exact ha.ne rfl }
instance infSet : InfSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sInf s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G⦄, G ∈ s → Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) Ne.symm
loopless := fun _ h => h.2 rfl }
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} {a b : V} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp [iInf]
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G, hG⟩ := hs
exact fun h => (h _ hG).ne
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _), Set.forall_mem_range]
/-- For graphs `G`, `H`, `G ≤ H` iff `∀ a b, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ show DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) from
adj_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun G H => ∀ ⦃a b⦄, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b }
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ SimpleGraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
compl := HasCompl.compl
sdiff := (· \ ·)
top := completeGraph V
bot := emptyGraph V
le_top := fun x _ _ h => x.ne_of_adj h
bot_le := fun _ _ _ h => h.elim
sdiff_eq := fun x y => by
ext v w
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, ⟨?_, h.2⟩⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩⟩
rintro rfl
exact x.irrefl h.1
inf_compl_le_bot := fun _ _ _ h => False.elim <| h.2.2 h.1
top_le_sup_compl := fun G v w hvw => by
by_cases h : G.Adj v w
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨hvw, h⟩
sSup := sSup
le_sSup := fun _ G hG _ _ hab => ⟨G, hG, hab⟩
sSup_le := fun s G hG a b => by
rintro ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact hG _ hH hab
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun _ _ hG _ _ hab => hab.1 hG
le_sInf := fun _ _ hG _ _ hab => ⟨fun _ hH => hG _ hH hab, hab.ne⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => by ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
@[simp]
theorem top_adj (v w : V) : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_adj (v w : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Adj v w ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem completeGraph_eq_top (V : Type u) : completeGraph V = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem emptyGraph_eq_bot (V : Type u) : emptyGraph V = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simps]
instance (V : Type u) : Inhabited (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance [Subsingleton V] : Unique (SimpleGraph V) where
default := ⊥
uniq G := by ext a b; have := Subsingleton.elim a b; simp [this]
instance [Nontrivial V] : Nontrivial (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, fun h ↦ not_subsingleton V ⟨by simpa only [← adj_inj, funext_iff, bot_adj,
top_adj, ne_eq, eq_iff_iff, false_iff, not_not] using h⟩⟩⟩
section Decidable
variable (V) (H : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
instance Bot.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun _ _ => False
instance Sup.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G ⊔ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∨ H.Adj v w
instance Inf.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G ⊓ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∧ H.Adj v w
instance Sdiff.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G \ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∧ ¬H.Adj v w
variable [DecidableEq V]
instance Top.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => v ≠ w
instance Compl.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (Gᶜ.Adj) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
end Decidable
end Order
/-- `G.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in `G`. -/
def support : Set V :=
Rel.dom G.Adj
theorem mem_support {v : V} : v ∈ G.support ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
theorem support_mono {G G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') : G.support ⊆ G'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h
/-- `G.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G`. -/
def neighborSet (v : V) : Set V := {w | G.Adj v w}
instance neighborSet.memDecidable (v : V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G.neighborSet v) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred (Adj G v)
lemma neighborSet_subset_support (v : V) : G.neighborSet v ⊆ G.support :=
fun _ hadj ↦ ⟨v, hadj.symm⟩
section EdgeSet
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V}
/-- The edges of G consist of the unordered pairs of vertices related by
`G.Adj`. This is the order embedding; for the edge set of a particular graph, see
`SimpleGraph.edgeSet`.
The way `edgeSet` is defined is such that `mem_edgeSet` is proved by `Iff.rfl`.
(That is, `s(v, w) ∈ G.edgeSet` is definitionally equal to `G.Adj v w`.)
-/
-- Porting note: We need a separate definition so that dot notation works.
def edgeSetEmbedding (V : Type*) : SimpleGraph V ↪o Set (Sym2 V) :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun G => Sym2.fromRel G.symm) fun _ _ =>
⟨fun h a b => @h s(a, b), fun h e => Sym2.ind @h e⟩
/-- `G.edgeSet` is the edge set for `G`.
This is an abbreviation for `edgeSetEmbedding G` that permits dot notation. -/
abbrev edgeSet (G : SimpleGraph V) : Set (Sym2 V) := edgeSetEmbedding V G
@[simp]
theorem mem_edgeSet : s(v, w) ∈ G.edgeSet ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet : e ∈ edgeSet G → ¬e.IsDiag :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ => Adj.ne) e
theorem edgeSet_inj : G₁.edgeSet = G₂.edgeSet ↔ G₁ = G₂ := (edgeSetEmbedding V).eq_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subset_edgeSet : edgeSet G₁ ⊆ edgeSet G₂ ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).le_iff_le
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet : edgeSet G₁ ⊂ edgeSet G₂ ↔ G₁ < G₂ :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).lt_iff_lt
theorem edgeSet_injective : Injective (edgeSet : SimpleGraph V → Set (Sym2 V)) :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).injective
alias ⟨_, edgeSet_mono⟩ := edgeSet_subset_edgeSet
alias ⟨_, edgeSet_strict_mono⟩ := edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet
attribute [mono] edgeSet_mono edgeSet_strict_mono
variable (G₁ G₂)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Sym2.fromRel_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet = {e | ¬e.IsDiag} :=
Sym2.fromRel_ne
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subset_setOf_not_isDiag : G.edgeSet ⊆ {e | ¬e.IsDiag} :=
fun _ h => (Sym2.fromRel_irreflexive (sym := G.symm)).mp G.loopless h
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet ∪ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet ∩ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sdiff : (G₁ \ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet \ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
variable {G G₁ G₂}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_edgeSet : Disjoint G₁.edgeSet G₂.edgeSet ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← edgeSet_inf, ← edgeSet_bot, ← Set.le_iff_subset,
OrderEmbedding.le_iff_le]
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_eq_empty : G.edgeSet = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by rw [← edgeSet_bot, edgeSet_inj]
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_nonempty : G.edgeSet.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeSet_eq_empty.ne]
/-- This lemma, combined with `edgeSet_sdiff` and `edgeSet_from_edgeSet`,
allows proving `(G \ from_edgeSet s).edge_set = G.edgeSet \ s` by `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sdiff_sdiff_isDiag (G : SimpleGraph V) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
G.edgeSet \ (s \ { e | e.IsDiag }) = G.edgeSet \ s := by
ext e
simp only [Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_and, not_not, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
simp only [G.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet h, imp_false]
/-- Two vertices are adjacent iff there is an edge between them. The
condition `v ≠ w` ensures they are different endpoints of the edge,
which is necessary since when `v = w` the existential
`∃ (e ∈ G.edgeSet), v ∈ e ∧ w ∈ e` is satisfied by every edge
incident to `v`. -/
theorem adj_iff_exists_edge {v w : V} : G.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ∃ e ∈ G.edgeSet, v ∈ e ∧ w ∈ e := by
refine ⟨fun _ => ⟨G.ne_of_adj ‹_›, s(v, w), by simpa⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hne, e, he, hv⟩
rw [Sym2.mem_and_mem_iff hne] at hv
subst e
rwa [mem_edgeSet] at he
theorem adj_iff_exists_edge_coe : G.Adj a b ↔ ∃ e : G.edgeSet, e.val = s(a, b) := by
simp only [mem_edgeSet, exists_prop, SetCoe.exists, exists_eq_right, Subtype.coe_mk]
variable (G G₁ G₂)
theorem edge_other_ne {e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ G.edgeSet) {v : V} (h : v ∈ e) :
Sym2.Mem.other h ≠ v := by
rw [← Sym2.other_spec h, Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact G.ne_of_adj he
instance decidableMemEdgeSet [DecidableRel G.Adj] : DecidablePred (· ∈ G.edgeSet) :=
Sym2.fromRel.decidablePred G.symm
instance fintypeEdgeSet [Fintype (Sym2 V)] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.edgeSet :=
Subtype.fintype _
instance fintypeEdgeSetBot : Fintype (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_bot]
infer_instance
instance fintypeEdgeSetSup [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
| Fintype (G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_sup]
infer_instance
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Basic.lean | 539 | 541 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,698 | 1,699 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,164 | 1,165 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
/-!
# Separable polynomials
We define a polynomial to be separable if it is coprime with its derivative. We prove basic
properties about separable polynomials here.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Separable f`: a polynomial `f` is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative.
* `IsSeparable K x`: an element `x` is separable over `K` iff the minimal polynomial of `x`
over `K` is separable.
* `Algebra.IsSeparable K L`: `L` is separable over `K` iff every element in `L` is separable
over `K`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S]
/-- A polynomial is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative. -/
@[stacks 09H1 "first part"]
def Separable (f : R[X]) : Prop :=
IsCoprime f (derivative f)
theorem separable_def (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ IsCoprime f (derivative f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem separable_def' (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ ∃ a b : R[X], a * f + b * (derivative f) = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_separable_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬Separable (0 : R[X]) := by
rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
simp only [derivative_zero, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
theorem Separable.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {f : R[X]} (h : f.Separable) : f ≠ 0 :=
(not_separable_zero <| · ▸ h)
@[simp]
theorem separable_one : (1 : R[X]).Separable :=
isCoprime_one_left
@[nontriviality]
theorem separable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (f : R[X]) : f.Separable := by
simp [Separable, IsCoprime, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem separable_X_add_C (a : R) : (X + C a).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_X : (X : R[X]).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_X]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_C (r : R) : (C r).Separable ↔ IsUnit r := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_C, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_C]
theorem Separable.of_mul_left {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : f.Separable := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_mul_right {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : g.Separable := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_mul_left
theorem Separable.of_dvd {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hfg : g ∣ f) : g.Separable := by
rcases hfg with ⟨f', rfl⟩
exact Separable.of_mul_left hf
theorem separable_gcd_left {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{f : F[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (g : F[X]) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hf (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
theorem separable_gcd_right {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{g : F[X]} (f : F[X]) (hg : g.Separable) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hg (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
theorem Separable.isCoprime {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : IsCoprime f g := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_pow' {f : R[X]} :
∀ {n : ℕ} (_h : (f ^ n).Separable), IsUnit f ∨ f.Separable ∧ n = 1 ∨ n = 0
| 0 => fun _h => Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl
| 1 => fun h => Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨pow_one f ▸ h, rfl⟩
| n + 2 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ] at h
exact Or.inl (isCoprime_self.1 h.isCoprime.of_mul_left_right)
theorem Separable.of_pow {f : R[X]} (hf : ¬IsUnit f) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hfs : (f ^ n).Separable) : f.Separable ∧ n = 1 :=
(hfs.of_pow'.resolve_left hf).resolve_right hn
theorem Separable.map {p : R[X]} (h : p.Separable) {f : R →+* S} : (p.map f).Separable :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a.map f, b.map f, by
rw [derivative_map, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, H,
Polynomial.map_one]⟩
theorem _root_.Associated.separable {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) (h : f.Separable) : g.Separable := by
obtain ⟨⟨u, v, h1, h2⟩, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a * v + b * derivative v, b * v, ?_⟩
replace h := congr($h * $(h1))
have h3 := congr(derivative $(h1))
simp only [← ha, derivative_mul, derivative_one] at h3 ⊢
calc
_ = (a * f + b * derivative f) * (u * v)
+ (b * f) * (derivative u * v + u * derivative v) := by ring1
_ = 1 := by rw [h, h3]; ring1
theorem _root_.Associated.separable_iff {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) : f.Separable ↔ g.Separable := ⟨ha.separable, ha.symm.separable⟩
theorem Separable.mul_unit {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : IsUnit g) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_mul_unit_right f g hg).separable hf
theorem Separable.unit_mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : IsUnit f) (hg : g.Separable) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_unit_mul_right g f hf).separable hg
theorem Separable.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(derivative p).eval₂ f x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx'
obtain ⟨a, b, e⟩ := h
apply_fun Polynomial.eval₂ f x at e
simp only [eval₂_add, eval₂_mul, hx, mul_zero, hx', add_zero, eval₂_one, zero_ne_one] at e
theorem Separable.aeval_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : aeval x p = 0) :
aeval x (derivative p) ≠ 0 :=
h.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero (algebraMap R S) hx
variable (p q : ℕ)
theorem isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable {p q : R[X]} (hp : p.Separable) (hq : q * q ∣ p) :
IsUnit q := by
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := hq
apply isCoprime_self.mp
have : IsCoprime (q * (q * p))
(q * (derivative q * p + derivative q * p + q * derivative p)) := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add]
dsimp only [Separable] at hp
convert hp using 1
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_mul]
ring
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left this)
theorem emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable {p q : R[X]} (hq : ¬IsUnit q) (hsep : Separable p) :
emultiplicity q p ≤ 1 := by
contrapose! hq
apply isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hsep
rw [← sq]
apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
exact Order.add_one_le_of_lt hq
/-- A separable polynomial is square-free.
See `PerfectField.separable_iff_squarefree` for the converse when the coefficients are a perfect
field. -/
theorem Separable.squarefree {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) : Squarefree p := by
classical
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one p]
exact fun f => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun hunit => emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable hunit hsep
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
theorem separable_X_sub_C {x : R} : Separable (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using separable_X_add_C (-x)
theorem Separable.mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : g.Separable) (h : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_mul]
exact
((hf.mul_right h).add_mul_left_right _).mul_left ((h.symm.mul_right hg).mul_add_right_right _)
theorem separable_prod' {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → R[X]} {s : Finset ι} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → IsCoprime (f x) (f y)) →
(∀ x ∈ s, (f x).Separable) → (∏ x ∈ s, f x).Separable := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (fun _ _ => separable_one) fun a s has ih h1 h2 => by
simp_rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert, forall_and] at h1 h2; rw [prod_insert has]
exact
h2.1.mul (ih h1.2.2 h2.2)
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun i his => h1.1.2 i his <| Ne.symm <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem his has)
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem separable_prod {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R[X]} (h1 : Pairwise (IsCoprime on f))
(h2 : ∀ x, (f x).Separable) : (∏ x, f x).Separable :=
separable_prod' (fun _x _hx _y _hy hxy => h1 hxy) fun x _hx => h2 x
theorem Separable.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → R} {s : Finset ι}
(hfs : (∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (f i))).Separable) {x y : ι} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hfxy : f x = f y) : x = y := by
classical
by_contra hxy
rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
insert_erase (mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hxy) hy), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
mul_assoc, hfxy, ← sq] at hfs
cases (hfs.of_mul_left.of_pow (not_isUnit_X_sub_C _) two_ne_zero).2
theorem Separable.injective_of_prod_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R}
(hfs : (∏ i, (X - C (f i))).Separable) : Function.Injective f := fun _x _y hfxy =>
hfs.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _) hfxy
theorem nodup_of_separable_prod [Nontrivial R] {s : Multiset R}
(hs : Separable (Multiset.map (fun a => X - C a) s).prod) : s.Nodup := by
rw [Multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons]
rintro a t rfl
refine not_isUnit_X_sub_C a (isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hs ?_)
simpa only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons] using mul_dvd_mul_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `IsUnit n` in a `CommRing R`, then `X ^ n - u` is separable for any unit `u`. -/
theorem separable_X_pow_sub_C_unit {n : ℕ} (u : Rˣ) (hn : IsUnit (n : R)) :
Separable (X ^ n - C (u : R)) := by
nontriviality R
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp at hn
apply (separable_def' (X ^ n - C (u : R))).2
obtain ⟨n', hn'⟩ := hn.exists_left_inv
refine ⟨-C ↑u⁻¹, C (↑u⁻¹ : R) * C n' * X, ?_⟩
rw [derivative_sub, derivative_C, sub_zero, derivative_pow X n, derivative_X, mul_one]
calc
-C ↑u⁻¹ * (X ^ n - C ↑u) + C ↑u⁻¹ * C n' * X * (↑n * X ^ (n - 1)) =
C (↑u⁻¹ * ↑u) - C ↑u⁻¹ * X ^ n + C ↑u⁻¹ * C (n' * ↑n) * (X * X ^ (n - 1)) := by
simp only [C.map_mul, C_eq_natCast]
ring
_ = 1 := by
simp only [Units.inv_mul, hn', C.map_one, mul_one, ← pow_succ',
Nat.sub_add_cancel (show 1 ≤ n from hpos), sub_add_cancel]
/-- If `n = 0` in `R` and `b` is a unit, then `a * X ^ n + b * X + c` is separable. -/
theorem separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C
{n : ℕ} (a b c : R) (hn : (n : R) = 0) (hb : IsUnit b) :
(C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c).Separable := by
set f := C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c
obtain ⟨e, hb⟩ := hb.exists_left_inv
refine ⟨-derivative f, f + C e, ?_⟩
have hderiv : derivative f = C b := by
simp [hn, f, map_add derivative, derivative_C, derivative_X_pow]
rw [hderiv, right_distrib, ← add_assoc, neg_mul, mul_comm, neg_add_cancel, zero_add,
← map_mul, hb, map_one]
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p`, `p ∣ n` and `b` is a unit,
then `a * X ^ n + b * X + c` is separable. -/
theorem separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C'
(p n : ℕ) (a b c : R) [CharP R p] (hn : p ∣ n) (hb : IsUnit b) :
(C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c).Separable :=
separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C a b c ((CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p n).2 hn) hb
theorem rootMultiplicity_le_one_of_separable [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p)
(x : R) : rootMultiplicity x p ≤ 1 := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg hp, ← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞),
Nat.cast_one, ← (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C x hp).emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable (not_isUnit_X_sub_C _) hsep
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem count_roots_le_one [DecidableEq R] {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) (x : R) :
p.roots.count x ≤ 1 := by
rw [count_roots p]
exact rootMultiplicity_le_one_of_separable hsep x
theorem nodup_roots {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) : p.roots.Nodup := by
classical
exact Multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one.mpr (count_roots_le_one hsep)
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {F : Type u} [Field F] {K : Type v} [Field K]
theorem separable_iff_derivative_ne_zero {f : F[X]} (hf : Irreducible f) :
f.Separable ↔ derivative f ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h1 h2 => hf.not_isUnit <| isCoprime_zero_right.1 <| h2 ▸ h1, fun h =>
EuclideanDomain.isCoprime_of_dvd (mt And.right h) fun g hg1 _hg2 ⟨p, hg3⟩ hg4 =>
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := (hf.isUnit_or_isUnit hg3).resolve_left hg1
have : f ∣ derivative f := by
conv_lhs => rw [hg3, ← hu]
rwa [Units.mul_right_dvd]
| not_lt_of_le (natDegree_le_of_dvd this h) <|
natDegree_derivative_lt <| mt derivative_of_natDegree_zero h⟩
attribute [local instance] Ideal.Quotient.field in
theorem separable_map {S} [CommRing S] [Nontrivial S] (f : F →+* S) {p : F[X]} :
(p.map f).Separable ↔ p.Separable := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H.map⟩
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal S
have := Separable.map H (f := Ideal.Quotient.mk m)
rwa [map_map, separable_def, derivative_map, isCoprime_map] at this
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Separable.lean | 318 | 327 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Multilinear.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry
/-!
# Currying and uncurrying continuous multilinear maps
We associate to a continuous multilinear map in `n+1` variables (i.e., based on `Fin n.succ`) two
curried functions, named `f.curryLeft` (which is a continuous linear map on `E 0` taking values
in continuous multilinear maps in `n` variables) and `f.curryRight` (which is a continuous
multilinear map in `n` variables taking values in continuous linear maps on `E (last n)`).
The inverse operations are called `uncurryLeft` and `uncurryRight`.
We also register continuous linear equiv versions of these correspondences, in
`continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv` and `continuousMultilinearCurryRightEquiv`.
## Main results
* `ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryLeft`, `ContinuousLinearMap.uncurryLeft` and
`continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv`
* `ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryRight`, `ContinuousMultilinearMap.uncurryRight` and
`continuousMultilinearCurryRightEquiv`.
-/
suppress_compilation
noncomputable section
open NNReal Finset Metric ContinuousMultilinearMap Fin Function
/-!
### Type variables
We use the following type variables in this file:
* `𝕜` : a `NontriviallyNormedField`;
* `ι`, `ι'` : finite index types with decidable equality;
* `E`, `E₁` : families of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : ι`;
* `E'` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i' : ι'`;
* `Ei` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : Fin (Nat.succ n)`;
* `G`, `G'` : normed vector spaces over `𝕜`.
-/
universe u v v' wE wE₁ wE' wEi wG wG'
variable {𝕜 : Type u} {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {n : ℕ} {E : ι → Type wE}
{Ei : Fin n.succ → Type wEi} {G : Type wG} {G' : Type wG'} [Fintype ι]
[Fintype ι'] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Ei i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Ei i)]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.norm_map_tail_le
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i : Fin n => Ei i.succ) G) (m : ∀ i, Ei i) :
‖f (m 0) (tail m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
calc
‖f (m 0) (tail m)‖ ≤ ‖f (m 0)‖ * ∏ i, ‖(tail m) i‖ := (f (m 0)).le_opNorm _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖m 0‖ * ∏ i, ‖tail m i‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_opNorm _) <| by positivity
_ = ‖f‖ * (‖m 0‖ * ∏ i, ‖(tail m) i‖) := by ring
_ = ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
rw [prod_univ_succ]
rfl
theorem ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_map_init_le
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i : Fin n => Ei <| castSucc i) (Ei (last n) →L[𝕜] G))
(m : ∀ i, Ei i) : ‖f (init m) (m (last n))‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
calc
‖f (init m) (m (last n))‖ ≤ ‖f (init m)‖ * ‖m (last n)‖ := (f (init m)).le_opNorm _
_ ≤ (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖(init m) i‖) * ‖m (last n)‖ :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_opNorm _) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖f‖ * ((∏ i, ‖(init m) i‖) * ‖m (last n)‖) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc]
rfl
theorem ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_map_cons_le (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, Ei i.succ) : ‖f (cons x m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
calc
‖f (cons x m)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖cons x m i‖ := f.le_opNorm _
_ = ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
rw [prod_univ_succ]
simp [mul_assoc]
theorem ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_map_snoc_le (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, Ei <| castSucc i) (x : Ei (last n)) :
‖f (snoc m x)‖ ≤ (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖f (snoc m x)‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖snoc m x i‖ := f.le_opNorm _
_ = (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc]
simp [mul_assoc]
/-! #### Left currying -/
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f` from `E 0` to continuous multilinear maps on `n` variables,
construct the corresponding continuous multilinear map on `n+1` variables obtained by concatenating
the variables, given by `m ↦ f (m 0) (tail m)` -/
def ContinuousLinearMap.uncurryLeft
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i : Fin n => Ei i.succ) G) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G :=
(@LinearMap.uncurryLeft 𝕜 n Ei G _ _ _ _ _
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear.comp f.toLinearMap)).mkContinuous
‖f‖ fun m => by exact ContinuousLinearMap.norm_map_tail_le f m
@[simp]
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.uncurryLeft_apply
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i : Fin n => Ei i.succ) G) (m : ∀ i, Ei i) :
f.uncurryLeft m = f (m 0) (tail m) :=
rfl
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the first variable to obtain
a continuous linear map into continuous multilinear maps in `n` variables, given by
`x ↦ (m ↦ f (cons x m))`. -/
def ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryLeft (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G) :
Ei 0 →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i : Fin n => Ei i.succ) G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ -- define a linear map into `n` continuous multilinear maps
-- from an `n+1` continuous multilinear map
toFun := fun x =>
(f.toMultilinearMap.curryLeft x).mkContinuous (‖f‖ * ‖x‖) (f.norm_map_cons_le x)
map_add' := fun x y => by
ext m
exact f.cons_add m x y
map_smul' := fun c x => by
ext m
exact
f.cons_smul m c x }-- then register its continuity thanks to its boundedness properties.
‖f‖ fun x => by
rw [LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk]
exact MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _
@[simp]
theorem ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryLeft_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G) (x : Ei 0)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, Ei i.succ) : f.curryLeft x m = f (cons x m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.curry_uncurryLeft
(f : Ei 0 →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun i : Fin n => Ei i.succ) G) :
f.uncurryLeft.curryLeft = f := by
ext m x
rw [ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryLeft_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.uncurryLeft_apply, tail_cons,
cons_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ContinuousMultilinearMap.uncurry_curryLeft (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G) :
f.curryLeft.uncurryLeft = f :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap_injective <| f.toMultilinearMap.uncurry_curryLeft
|
variable (𝕜 Ei G)
/-- The space of continuous multilinear maps on `Π(i : Fin (n+1)), E i` is canonically isomorphic to
the space of continuous linear maps from `E 0` to the space of continuous multilinear maps on
`Π(i : Fin n), E i.succ`, by separating the first variable. We register this isomorphism in
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Multilinear/Curry.lean | 155 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,744 | 1,754 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 893 | 895 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker, Devon Tuma, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
/-!
# Uniform distributions and probability mass functions
This file defines two related notions of uniform distributions, which will be unified in the future.
# Uniform distributions
Defines the uniform distribution for any set with finite measure.
## Main definitions
* `IsUniform X s ℙ μ` : A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` under `ℙ` if the
push-forward measure agrees with the rescaled restricted measure `μ`.
# Uniform probability mass functions
This file defines a number of uniform `PMF` distributions from various inputs,
uniformly drawing from the corresponding object.
## Main definitions
`PMF.uniformOfFinset` gives each element in the set equal probability,
with `0` probability for elements not in the set.
`PMF.uniformOfFintype` gives all elements equal probability,
equal to the inverse of the size of the `Fintype`.
`PMF.ofMultiset` draws randomly from the given `Multiset`, treating duplicate values as distinct.
Each probability is given by the count of the element divided by the size of the `Multiset`
## TODO
* Refactor the `PMF` definitions to come from a `uniformMeasure` on a `Finset`/`Fintype`/`Multiset`.
-/
open scoped Finset MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
-- TODO: We can't `open ProbabilityTheory` without opening the `ProbabilityTheory` locale :(
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure PMF
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {μ : Measure E}
namespace pdf
variable {Ω : Type*}
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
/-- A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` if its push-forward measure is
`(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. -/
def IsUniform (X : Ω → E) (s : Set E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :=
map X ℙ = ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s
namespace IsUniform
theorem aemeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
dsimp [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at hu
by_contra h
rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable h] at hu
apply zero_ne_one' ℝ≥0∞
calc
0 = (0 : Measure E) Set.univ := rfl
_ = _ := by rw [hu, smul_apply, restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hns hnt]
theorem absolutelyContinuous {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hu]; exact ProbabilityTheory.cond_absolutelyContinuous
theorem measure_preimage {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) {A : Set E} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
ℙ (X ⁻¹' A) = μ (s ∩ A) / μ s := by
rwa [← map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) hA, hu, ProbabilityTheory.cond_apply',
ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem isProbabilityMeasure {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ :=
⟨by
have : X ⁻¹' Set.univ = Set.univ := Set.preimage_univ
rw [← this, hu.measure_preimage hns hnt MeasurableSet.univ, Set.inter_univ,
ENNReal.div_self hns hnt]⟩
theorem toMeasurable_iff {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ ↔ IsUniform X s ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
protected theorem toMeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform at *
rwa [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
theorem hasPDF {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
let t := toMeasurable μ s
apply hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) (t.indicator ((μ t)⁻¹ • 1)) <|
(measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ t)⁻¹).indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
rw [hu, withDensity_indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s), withDensity_smul _ measurable_one,
withDensity_one, restrict_toMeasurable hnt, measure_toMeasurable, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
theorem pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E}
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) (hμs : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = ∞) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases hμs with H|H
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_zero, restrict_eq_zero.mpr H,
| smul_zero] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_top, zero_smul] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
theorem pdf_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) := by
by_cases hnt : μ s = ∞
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Uniform.lean | 114 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Linearity of the L-series of `f` as a function of `f`
We show that the `LSeries` of `f : ℕ → ℂ` is a linear function of `f` (assuming convergence
of both L-series when adding two functions).
-/
/-!
### Addition
-/
open LSeries
lemma LSeries.term_add (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term (f + g) s = term f s + term g s := by
ext ⟨- | n⟩ <;>
simp [add_div]
lemma LSeries.term_add_apply (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term (f + g) s n = term f s n + term g s n := by
simp [term_add]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.add {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s a b : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a)
(hg : LSeriesHasSum g s b) :
LSeriesHasSum (f + g) s (a + b) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_add] using HasSum.add hf hg
lemma LSeriesSummable.add {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s)
(hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeriesSummable (f + g) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, ← term_add_apply] using Summable.add hf hg
@[simp]
lemma LSeries_add {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) (hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeries (f + g) s = LSeries f s + LSeries g s := by
simpa [LSeries, term_add] using hf.tsum_add hg
/-!
### Negation
-/
lemma LSeries.term_neg (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term (-f) s = -term f s := by
ext ⟨- | n⟩ <;>
simp [neg_div]
lemma LSeries.term_neg_apply (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : term (-f) s n = -term f s n := by
simp [term_neg]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.neg {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s a : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a) :
LSeriesHasSum (-f) s (-a) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_neg] using HasSum.neg hf
lemma LSeriesSummable.neg {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) :
LSeriesSummable (-f) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, term_neg] using Summable.neg hf
@[simp]
lemma LSeriesSummable.neg_iff {f : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} :
LSeriesSummable (-f) s ↔ LSeriesSummable f s :=
⟨fun H ↦ neg_neg f ▸ H.neg, .neg⟩
@[simp]
lemma LSeries_neg (f : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : LSeries (-f) s = -LSeries f s := by
simp [LSeries, term_neg_apply, tsum_neg]
/-!
### Subtraction
-/
lemma LSeries.term_sub (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) : term (f - g) s = term f s - term g s := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, term_add, term_neg]
lemma LSeries.term_sub_apply (f g : ℕ → ℂ) (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term (f - g) s n = term f s n - term g s n := by
rw [term_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.sub {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s a b : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a)
(hg : LSeriesHasSum g s b) :
LSeriesHasSum (f - g) s (a - b) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_sub] using HasSum.sub hf hg
lemma LSeriesSummable.sub {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s)
(hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeriesSummable (f - g) s := by
simpa [LSeriesSummable, ← term_sub_apply] using Summable.sub hf hg
@[simp]
lemma LSeries_sub {f g : ℕ → ℂ} {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) (hg : LSeriesSummable g s) :
LSeries (f - g) s = LSeries f s - LSeries g s := by
simpa [LSeries, term_sub] using hf.tsum_sub hg
/-!
### Scalar multiplication
-/
lemma LSeries.term_smul (f : ℕ → ℂ) (c s : ℂ) : term (c • f) s = c • term f s := by
ext ⟨- | n⟩ <;>
simp [mul_div_assoc]
lemma LSeries.term_smul_apply (f : ℕ → ℂ) (c s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
term (c • f) s n = c * term f s n := by
simp [term_smul]
lemma LSeriesHasSum.smul {f : ℕ → ℂ} (c : ℂ) {s a : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesHasSum f s a) :
LSeriesHasSum (c • f) s (c * a) := by
simpa [LSeriesHasSum, term_smul] using hf.const_smul c
lemma LSeriesSummable.smul {f : ℕ → ℂ} (c : ℂ) {s : ℂ} (hf : LSeriesSummable f s) :
LSeriesSummable (c • f) s := by
| simpa [LSeriesSummable, term_smul] using hf.const_smul c
lemma LSeriesSummable.of_smul {f : ℕ → ℂ} {c s : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (hf : LSeriesSummable (c • f) s) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Linearity.lean | 117 | 119 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff' := norm_eq_one_iff'
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using norm_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
| add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 434 | 435 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Extra lemmas about permutations
This file proves miscellaneous lemmas about `Equiv.Perm`.
## TODO
Most of the content of this file was moved to `Algebra.Group.End` in
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/22141.
It would be good to merge the remaining lemmas with other files, eg `GroupTheory.Perm.ViaEmbedding`
looks like it could benefit from such a treatment (splitting into the algebra and non-algebra parts)
-/
universe u v
namespace Equiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace Perm
@[simp] lemma image_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ '' s = f ⁻¹' s := f⁻¹.image_eq_preimage _
@[simp] lemma preimage_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ ⁻¹' s = f '' s :=
(f.image_eq_preimage _).symm
end Perm
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem swap_smul_self_smul [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) (x : β) :
swap i j • swap i j • x = x := by simp [smul_smul]
theorem swap_smul_involutive [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) :
Function.Involutive (swap i j • · : β → β) := swap_smul_self_smul i j
end Swap
end Equiv
open Equiv Function
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} {f : Perm α} {s : Set α}
lemma BijOn.perm_inv (hf : BijOn f s s) : BijOn ↑(f⁻¹) s s := hf.symm f.invOn
lemma MapsTo.perm_pow : MapsTo f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, MapsTo (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact MapsTo.iterate
lemma SurjOn.perm_pow : SurjOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, SurjOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact SurjOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_pow : BijOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact BijOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_zpow (hf : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n : ℤ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s
| Int.ofNat n => hf.perm_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => (hf.perm_pow (n + 1)).perm_inv
end Set
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Basic.lean | 393 | 394 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
/-!
# Base change of polynomial algebras
Given `[CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]` we show `A[X] ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] R[X])`.
-/
-- This file should not become entangled with `RingTheory/MatrixAlgebra`.
assert_not_exists Matrix
universe u v w
open Polynomial TensorProduct
open Algebra.TensorProduct (algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct includeLeft)
noncomputable section
variable (R A : Type*)
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
namespace PolyEquivTensor
/-- (Implementation detail).
The function underlying `A ⊗[R] R[X] →ₐ[R] A[X]`,
as a bilinear function of two arguments.
-/
def toFunBilinear : A →ₗ[A] R[X] →ₗ[R] A[X] :=
LinearMap.toSpanSingleton A _ (aeval (Polynomial.X : A[X])).toLinearMap
theorem toFunBilinear_apply_apply (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
toFunBilinear R A a p = a • (aeval X) p := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFunBilinear_apply_eq_smul (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
toFunBilinear R A a p = a • p.map (algebraMap R A) := rfl
theorem toFunBilinear_apply_eq_sum (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
toFunBilinear R A a p = p.sum fun n r ↦ monomial n (a * algebraMap R A r) := by
conv_lhs => rw [toFunBilinear_apply_eq_smul, ← p.sum_monomial_eq, sum, Polynomial.map_sum]
simp [Finset.smul_sum, sum, ← smul_eq_mul]
/-- (Implementation detail).
The function underlying `A ⊗[R] R[X] →ₐ[R] A[X]`,
as a linear map.
-/
def toFunLinear : A ⊗[R] R[X] →ₗ[R] A[X] :=
TensorProduct.lift (toFunBilinear R A)
@[simp]
theorem toFunLinear_tmul_apply (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
toFunLinear R A (a ⊗ₜ[R] p) = toFunBilinear R A a p :=
rfl
-- We apparently need to provide the decidable instance here
-- in order to successfully rewrite by this lemma.
theorem toFunLinear_mul_tmul_mul_aux_1 (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) (h : Decidable ¬p.coeff k = 0) (a : A) :
ite (¬coeff p k = 0) (a * (algebraMap R A) (coeff p k)) 0 =
a * (algebraMap R A) (coeff p k) := by classical split_ifs <;> simp [*]
theorem toFunLinear_mul_tmul_mul_aux_2 (k : ℕ) (a₁ a₂ : A) (p₁ p₂ : R[X]) :
a₁ * a₂ * (algebraMap R A) ((p₁ * p₂).coeff k) =
(Finset.antidiagonal k).sum fun x =>
a₁ * (algebraMap R A) (coeff p₁ x.1) * (a₂ * (algebraMap R A) (coeff p₂ x.2)) := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, Algebra.commutes, ← Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc, ← Finset.mul_sum]
congr
simp_rw [Algebra.commutes (coeff p₂ _), coeff_mul, map_sum, RingHom.map_mul]
theorem toFunLinear_mul_tmul_mul (a₁ a₂ : A) (p₁ p₂ : R[X]) :
(toFunLinear R A) ((a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ[R] (p₁ * p₂)) =
(toFunLinear R A) (a₁ ⊗ₜ[R] p₁) * (toFunLinear R A) (a₂ ⊗ₜ[R] p₂) := by
classical
simp only [toFunLinear_tmul_apply, toFunBilinear_apply_eq_sum]
ext k
simp_rw [coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, sum_def, Finset.sum_ite_eq', mem_support_iff, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [coeff_mul]
simp_rw [finset_sum_coeff, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq', mem_support_iff, Ne, mul_ite,
mul_zero, ite_mul, zero_mul]
simp_rw [← ite_zero_mul (¬coeff p₁ _ = 0) (a₁ * (algebraMap R A) (coeff p₁ _))]
simp_rw [← mul_ite_zero (¬coeff p₂ _ = 0) _ (_ * _)]
simp_rw [toFunLinear_mul_tmul_mul_aux_1, toFunLinear_mul_tmul_mul_aux_2]
theorem toFunLinear_one_tmul_one :
toFunLinear R A (1 ⊗ₜ[R] 1) = 1 := by
rw [toFunLinear_tmul_apply, toFunBilinear_apply_apply, Polynomial.aeval_one, one_smul]
/-- (Implementation detail).
The algebra homomorphism `A ⊗[R] R[X] →ₐ[R] A[X]`.
-/
def toFunAlgHom : A ⊗[R] R[X] →ₐ[R] A[X] :=
algHomOfLinearMapTensorProduct (toFunLinear R A) (toFunLinear_mul_tmul_mul R A)
(toFunLinear_one_tmul_one R A)
@[simp] theorem toFunAlgHom_apply_tmul_eq_smul (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
toFunAlgHom R A (a ⊗ₜ[R] p) = a • p.map (algebraMap R A) := rfl
theorem toFunAlgHom_apply_tmul (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
toFunAlgHom R A (a ⊗ₜ[R] p) = p.sum fun n r => monomial n (a * (algebraMap R A) r) :=
toFunBilinear_apply_eq_sum R A _ _
/-- (Implementation detail.)
The bare function `A[X] → A ⊗[R] R[X]`.
(We don't need to show that it's an algebra map, thankfully --- just that it's an inverse.)
-/
def invFun (p : A[X]) : A ⊗[R] R[X] :=
p.eval₂ (includeLeft : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] R[X]) ((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (X : R[X]))
@[simp]
theorem invFun_add {p q} : invFun R A (p + q) = invFun R A p + invFun R A q := by
simp only [invFun, eval₂_add]
theorem invFun_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : A) :
invFun R A (monomial n a) = (a ⊗ₜ[R] 1) * 1 ⊗ₜ[R] X ^ n :=
eval₂_monomial _ _
theorem left_inv (x : A ⊗ R[X]) : invFun R A ((toFunAlgHom R A) x) = x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp [invFun]
· intro a p
dsimp only [invFun]
rw [toFunAlgHom_apply_tmul, eval₂_sum]
simp_rw [eval₂_monomial, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_pow, one_pow,
Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft_apply, Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_one,
one_mul, ← Algebra.commutes, ← Algebra.smul_def, smul_tmul, sum_def, ← tmul_sum]
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p]
simp only [Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
· intro p q hp hq
simp only [map_add, invFun_add, hp, hq]
theorem right_inv (x : A[X]) : (toFunAlgHom R A) (invFun R A x) = x := by
refine Polynomial.induction_on' x ?_ ?_
· intro p q hp hq
simp only [invFun_add, map_add, hp, hq]
· intro n a
rw [invFun_monomial, Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_pow,
one_pow, Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_one, one_mul, toFunAlgHom_apply_tmul,
X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_index] <;>
simp
/-- (Implementation detail)
The equivalence, ignoring the algebra structure, `(A ⊗[R] R[X]) ≃ A[X]`.
-/
def equiv : A ⊗[R] R[X] ≃ A[X] where
toFun := toFunAlgHom R A
invFun := invFun R A
left_inv := left_inv R A
right_inv := right_inv R A
end PolyEquivTensor
open PolyEquivTensor
/-- The `R`-algebra isomorphism `A[X] ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] R[X])`.
-/
def polyEquivTensor : A[X] ≃ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] R[X] :=
AlgEquiv.symm { PolyEquivTensor.toFunAlgHom R A, PolyEquivTensor.equiv R A with }
@[simp]
theorem polyEquivTensor_apply (p : A[X]) :
polyEquivTensor R A p =
p.eval₂ (includeLeft : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] R[X]) ((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (X : R[X])) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem polyEquivTensor_symm_apply_tmul_eq_smul (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
(polyEquivTensor R A).symm (a ⊗ₜ p) = a • p.map (algebraMap R A) := rfl
theorem polyEquivTensor_symm_apply_tmul (a : A) (p : R[X]) :
(polyEquivTensor R A).symm (a ⊗ₜ p) = p.sum fun n r => monomial n (a * algebraMap R A r) :=
toFunAlgHom_apply_tmul _ _ _ _
section
variable (A : Type*) [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- The `A`-algebra isomorphism `A[X] ≃ₐ[A] A ⊗[R] R[X]` (when `A` is commutative). -/
def polyEquivTensor' : A[X] ≃ₐ[A] A ⊗[R] R[X] where
__ := polyEquivTensor R A
commutes' a := by simp
/-- `polyEquivTensor' R A` is the same as `polyEquivTensor R A` as a function. -/
@[simp] theorem coe_polyEquivTensor' : ⇑(polyEquivTensor' R A) = polyEquivTensor R A := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_polyEquivTensor'_symm :
⇑(polyEquivTensor' R A).symm = (polyEquivTensor R A).symm := rfl
end
/-- If `A` is an `R`-algebra, then `A[X]` is an `R[X]` algebra.
This gives a diamond for `Algebra R[X] R[X][X]`, so this is not a global instance. -/
@[reducible] def Polynomial.algebra : Algebra R[X] A[X] :=
(mapRingHom (algebraMap R A)).toAlgebra' fun _ _ ↦ by
ext; rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_swap, coeff_mul]; simp [Algebra.commutes]
attribute [local instance] Polynomial.algebra
@[simp]
theorem Polynomial.algebraMap_def : algebraMap R[X] A[X] = mapRingHom (algebraMap R A) := rfl
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] A[X] := .of_algebraMap_eq' (mapRingHom_comp_C _).symm
instance [FaithfulSMul R A] : FaithfulSMul R[X] A[X] :=
(faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective ..).mpr
(map_injective _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective ..)
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
instance : Algebra.IsPushout R S R[X] S[X] where
out := .of_equiv (polyEquivTensor' R S).symm fun _ ↦
(polyEquivTensor_symm_apply_tmul_eq_smul ..).trans <| one_smul ..
instance : Algebra.IsPushout R R[X] S S[X] := .symm inferInstance
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PolynomialAlgebra.lean | 245 | 254 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
| @[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 235 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
/-!
# Continuity of power functions
This file contains lemmas about continuity of the power functions on `ℂ`, `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Topology NNReal ENNReal Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
section CpowLimits
/-!
## Continuity for complex powers
-/
open Complex
variable {α : Type*}
theorem zero_cpow_eq_nhds {b : ℂ} (hb : b ≠ 0) : (fun x : ℂ => (0 : ℂ) ^ x) =ᶠ[𝓝 b] 0 := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 b, x ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [zero_cpow hx, Pi.zero_apply]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne hb
theorem cpow_eq_nhds {a b : ℂ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(fun x => x ^ b) =ᶠ[𝓝 a] fun x => exp (log x * b) := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 a, x ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx]
exact IsOpen.eventually_mem isOpen_ne ha
theorem cpow_eq_nhds' {p : ℂ × ℂ} (hp_fst : p.fst ≠ 0) :
(fun x => x.1 ^ x.2) =ᶠ[𝓝 p] fun x => exp (log x.1 * x.2) := by
suffices ∀ᶠ x : ℂ × ℂ in 𝓝 p, x.1 ≠ 0 from
this.mono fun x hx ↦ by
dsimp only
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx]
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ hp_fst
change IsOpen { x : ℂ × ℂ | x.1 = 0 }ᶜ
rw [isOpen_compl_iff]
exact isClosed_eq continuous_fst continuous_const
-- Continuity of `fun x => a ^ x`: union of these two lemmas is optimal.
theorem continuousAt_const_cpow {a b : ℂ} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => a ^ x) b := by
have cpow_eq : (fun x : ℂ => a ^ x) = fun x => exp (log a * x) := by
ext1 b
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero ha]
rw [cpow_eq]
exact continuous_exp.continuousAt.comp (ContinuousAt.mul continuousAt_const continuousAt_id)
theorem continuousAt_const_cpow' {a b : ℂ} (h : b ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => a ^ x) b := by
| by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha, continuousAt_congr (zero_cpow_eq_nhds h)]
exact continuousAt_const
· exact continuousAt_const_cpow ha
/-- The function `z ^ w` is continuous in `(z, w)` provided that `z` does not belong to the interval
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Continuity.lean | 66 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
/-! # sublists
`List.Sublists` gives a list of all (not necessarily contiguous) sublists of a list.
This file contains basic results on this function.
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Nat
namespace List
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper definition for `sublists'` -/
def sublists'Aux (a : α) (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r₁.foldl (init := r₂) fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl (a : α) : ∀ (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = ((r₁.toArray).foldl (init := r₂.toArray)
(fun r l => r.push (a :: l))).toList := by
intro r₁ r₂
rw [sublists'Aux, Array.foldl_toList]
have := List.foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => r.push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]) (l := r₁) (init := r₂.toArray) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux (l : List α) :
sublists' l = l.foldr (fun a r => sublists'Aux a r r) [[]] := by
simp only [sublists', sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl]
rw [← List.foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists'Aux_eq_map (a : α) (r₁ : List (List α)) : ∀ (r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = r₂ ++ map (cons a) r₁ :=
List.reverseRecOn r₁ (fun _ => by simp [sublists'Aux]) fun r₁ l ih r₂ => by
rw [map_append, map_singleton, ← append_assoc, ← ih, sublists'Aux, foldl_append, foldl]
simp [sublists'Aux]
@[simp 900]
theorem sublists'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists' (a :: l) = sublists' l ++ map (cons a) (sublists' l) := by
simp [sublists'_eq_sublists'Aux, foldr_cons, sublists'Aux_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublists' {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists' t ↔ s <+ t := by
induction' t with a t IH generalizing s
· simp only [sublists'_nil, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h], eq_nil_of_sublist_nil⟩
simp only [sublists'_cons, mem_append, IH, mem_map]
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with (h | ⟨s, h, rfl⟩)
· exact sublist_cons_of_sublist _ h
· exact h.cons_cons _
· obtain - | ⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_sublists' : ∀ l : List α, length (sublists' l) = 2 ^ length l
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
simp +arith only [sublists'_cons, length_append, length_sublists' l,
length_map, length, Nat.pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem sublists_nil : sublists (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sublists_singleton (a : α) : sublists [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary helper function for `sublists` -/
def sublistsAux (a : α) (r : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r.foldl (init := []) fun r l => r ++ [l, a :: l]
theorem sublistsAux_eq_array_foldl :
sublistsAux = fun (a : α) (r : List (List α)) =>
(r.toArray.foldl (init := #[])
fun r l => (r.push l).push (a :: l)).toList := by
funext a r
simp only [sublistsAux, Array.foldl_toList, Array.mkEmpty]
have := foldl_hom Array.toList (g₁ := fun r l => (r.push l).push (a :: l))
(g₂ := fun r l => r ++ [l, a :: l]) (l := r) (init := #[]) (by simp)
simpa using this
theorem sublistsAux_eq_flatMap :
sublistsAux = fun (a : α) (r : List (List α)) => r.flatMap fun l => [l, a :: l] :=
funext fun a => funext fun r =>
List.reverseRecOn r
(by simp [sublistsAux])
(fun r l ih => by
rw [flatMap_append, ← ih, flatMap_singleton, sublistsAux, foldl_append]
simp [sublistsAux])
@[csimp] theorem sublists_eq_sublistsFast : @sublists = @sublistsFast := by
ext α l : 2
trans l.foldr sublistsAux [[]]
· rw [sublistsAux_eq_flatMap, sublists]
· simp only [sublistsFast, sublistsAux_eq_array_foldl, Array.foldr_toList]
rw [← foldr_hom Array.toList]
· intros _ _; congr
theorem sublists_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
sublists (l₁ ++ l₂) = (sublists l₂) >>= (fun x => (sublists l₁).map (· ++ x)) := by
simp only [sublists, foldr_append]
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons a l₁ ih =>
rw [foldr_cons, ih]
simp [List.flatMap, flatten_flatten, Function.comp_def]
theorem sublists_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
sublists (a :: l) = sublists l >>= (fun x => [x, a :: x]) :=
show sublists ([a] ++ l) = _ by
rw [sublists_append]
simp only [sublists_singleton, map_cons, bind_eq_flatMap, nil_append, cons_append, map_nil]
@[simp]
theorem sublists_concat (l : List α) (a : α) :
sublists (l ++ [a]) = sublists l ++ map (fun x => x ++ [a]) (sublists l) := by
rw [sublists_append, sublists_singleton, bind_eq_flatMap, flatMap_cons, flatMap_cons, flatMap_nil,
map_id'' append_nil, append_nil]
theorem sublists_reverse (l : List α) : sublists (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists' l) := by
induction' l with hd tl ih <;> [rfl;
simp only [reverse_cons, sublists_append, sublists'_cons, map_append, ih, sublists_singleton,
map_eq_map, bind_eq_flatMap, map_map, flatMap_cons, append_nil, flatMap_nil,
Function.comp_def]]
theorem sublists_eq_sublists' (l : List α) : sublists l = map reverse (sublists' (reverse l)) := by
rw [← sublists_reverse, reverse_reverse]
theorem sublists'_reverse (l : List α) : sublists' (reverse l) = map reverse (sublists l) := by
simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', map_map, map_id'' reverse_reverse, Function.comp_def]
theorem sublists'_eq_sublists (l : List α) : sublists' l = map reverse (sublists (reverse l)) := by
rw [← sublists'_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp]
theorem mem_sublists {s t : List α} : s ∈ sublists t ↔ s <+ t := by
rw [← reverse_sublist, ← mem_sublists', sublists'_reverse,
mem_map_of_injective reverse_injective]
@[simp]
theorem length_sublists (l : List α) : length (sublists l) = 2 ^ length l := by
simp only [sublists_eq_sublists', length_map, length_sublists', length_reverse]
theorem map_pure_sublist_sublists (l : List α) : map pure l <+ sublists l := by
induction' l using reverseRecOn with l a ih <;> simp only [map, map_append, sublists_concat]
· simp only [sublists_nil, sublist_cons_self]
exact ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 <|
singleton_sublist.2 <| mem_map.2 ⟨[], mem_sublists.2 (nil_sublist _), by rfl⟩).trans
((append_sublist_append_right _).2 ih)
/-! ### sublistsLen -/
/-- Auxiliary function to construct the list of all sublists of a given length. Given an
integer `n`, a list `l`, a function `f` and an auxiliary list `L`, it returns the list made of
`f` applied to all sublists of `l` of length `n`, concatenated with `L`. -/
def sublistsLenAux : ℕ → List α → (List α → β) → List β → List β
| 0, _, f, r => f [] :: r
| _ + 1, [], _, r => r
| n + 1, a :: l, f, r => sublistsLenAux (n + 1) l f (sublistsLenAux n l (f ∘ List.cons a) r)
/-- The list of all sublists of a list `l` that are of length `n`. For instance, for
`l = [0, 1, 2, 3]` and `n = 2`, one gets
`[[2, 3], [1, 3], [1, 2], [0, 3], [0, 2], [0, 1]]`. -/
| def sublistsLen (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : List (List α) :=
sublistsLenAux n l id []
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sublists.lean | 192 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
| theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 134 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Fintype
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
/-!
# Sylow theorems
The Sylow theorems are the following results for every finite group `G` and every prime number `p`.
* There exists a Sylow `p`-subgroup of `G`.
* All Sylow `p`-subgroups of `G` are conjugate to each other.
* Let `nₚ` be the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups of `G`, then `nₚ` divides the index of the Sylow
`p`-subgroup, `nₚ ≡ 1 [MOD p]`, and `nₚ` is equal to the index of the normalizer of the Sylow
`p`-subgroup in `G`.
## Main definitions
* `Sylow p G` : The type of Sylow `p`-subgroups of `G`.
## Main statements
* `Sylow.exists_subgroup_card_pow_prime`: A generalization of Sylow's first theorem:
For every prime power `pⁿ` dividing the cardinality of `G`,
there exists a subgroup of `G` of order `pⁿ`.
* `IsPGroup.exists_le_sylow`: A generalization of Sylow's first theorem:
Every `p`-subgroup is contained in a Sylow `p`-subgroup.
* `Sylow.card_eq_multiplicity`: The cardinality of a Sylow subgroup is `p ^ n`
where `n` is the multiplicity of `p` in the group order.
* `Sylow.isPretransitive_of_finite`: a generalization of Sylow's second theorem:
If the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups is finite, then all Sylow `p`-subgroups are conjugate.
* `card_sylow_modEq_one`: a generalization of Sylow's third theorem:
If the number of Sylow `p`-subgroups is finite, then it is congruent to `1` modulo `p`.
-/
open MulAction Subgroup
section InfiniteSylow
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- A Sylow `p`-subgroup is a maximal `p`-subgroup. -/
structure Sylow extends Subgroup G where
isPGroup' : IsPGroup p toSubgroup
is_maximal' : ∀ {Q : Subgroup G}, IsPGroup p Q → toSubgroup ≤ Q → Q = toSubgroup
variable {p} {G}
namespace Sylow
attribute [coe] toSubgroup
instance : CoeOut (Sylow p G) (Subgroup G) :=
⟨toSubgroup⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {P Q : Sylow p G} (h : (P : Subgroup G) = Q) : P = Q := by cases P; cases Q; congr
instance : SetLike (Sylow p G) G where
coe := (↑)
coe_injective' _ _ h := ext (SetLike.coe_injective h)
instance : SubgroupClass (Sylow p G) G where
mul_mem := Subgroup.mul_mem _
one_mem _ := Subgroup.one_mem _
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem _
/-- A `p`-subgroup with index indivisible by `p` is a Sylow subgroup. -/
def _root_.IsPGroup.toSylow [Fact p.Prime] {P : Subgroup G}
(hP1 : IsPGroup p P) (hP2 : ¬ p ∣ P.index) : Sylow p G :=
{ P with
isPGroup' := hP1
is_maximal' := by
intro Q hQ hPQ
have : P.FiniteIndex := ⟨fun h ↦ hP2 (h ▸ (dvd_zero p))⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (hQ.to_quotient (P.normalCore.subgroupOf Q)).exists_card_eq
have h := hk ▸ Nat.Prime.coprime_pow_of_not_dvd (m := k) Fact.out hP2
exact le_antisymm (Subgroup.relindex_eq_one.mp
(Nat.eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes h (Subgroup.relindex_dvd_index_of_le hPQ)
(Subgroup.relindex_dvd_of_le_left Q P.normalCore_le))) hPQ }
@[simp] theorem _root_.IsPGroup.toSylow_coe [Fact p.Prime] {P : Subgroup G}
(hP1 : IsPGroup p P) (hP2 : ¬ p ∣ P.index) : (hP1.toSylow hP2) = P :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem _root_.IsPGroup.mem_toSylow [Fact p.Prime] {P : Subgroup G}
(hP1 : IsPGroup p P) (hP2 : ¬ p ∣ P.index) {g : G} : g ∈ hP1.toSylow hP2 ↔ g ∈ P :=
.rfl
/-- A subgroup with cardinality `p ^ n` is a Sylow subgroup
where `n` is the multiplicity of `p` in the group order. -/
def ofCard [Finite G] {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (H : Subgroup G)
(card_eq : Nat.card H = p ^ (Nat.card G).factorization p) : Sylow p G :=
(IsPGroup.of_card card_eq).toSylow (by
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left (Nat.card_pos (α := H)).ne', card_mul_index, card_eq, ← pow_succ]
exact Nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd Nat.card_pos.ne' Fact.out)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofCard [Finite G] {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (H : Subgroup G)
(card_eq : Nat.card H = p ^ (Nat.card G).factorization p) : ofCard H card_eq = H :=
rfl
variable (P : Sylow p G)
variable {K : Type*} [Group K] (ϕ : K →* G) {N : Subgroup G}
/-- The preimage of a Sylow subgroup under a p-group-kernel homomorphism is a Sylow subgroup. -/
def comapOfKerIsPGroup (hϕ : IsPGroup p ϕ.ker) (h : P ≤ ϕ.range) : Sylow p K :=
{ P.1.comap ϕ with
isPGroup' := P.2.comap_of_ker_isPGroup ϕ hϕ
is_maximal' := fun {Q} hQ hle => by
show Q = P.1.comap ϕ
rw [← P.3 (hQ.map ϕ) (le_trans (ge_of_eq (map_comap_eq_self h)) (map_mono hle))]
exact (comap_map_eq_self ((P.1.ker_le_comap ϕ).trans hle)).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comapOfKerIsPGroup (hϕ : IsPGroup p ϕ.ker) (h : P ≤ ϕ.range) :
P.comapOfKerIsPGroup ϕ hϕ h = P.comap ϕ :=
rfl
/-- The preimage of a Sylow subgroup under an injective homomorphism is a Sylow subgroup. -/
def comapOfInjective (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) (h : P ≤ ϕ.range) : Sylow p K :=
P.comapOfKerIsPGroup ϕ (IsPGroup.ker_isPGroup_of_injective hϕ) h
@[simp]
theorem coe_comapOfInjective (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) (h : P ≤ ϕ.range) :
P.comapOfInjective ϕ hϕ h = P.comap ϕ :=
rfl
/-- A sylow subgroup of G is also a sylow subgroup of a subgroup of G. -/
protected def subtype (h : P ≤ N) : Sylow p N :=
P.comapOfInjective N.subtype Subtype.coe_injective (by rwa [range_subtype])
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype (h : P ≤ N) : P.subtype h = subgroupOf P N :=
rfl
theorem subtype_injective {P Q : Sylow p G} {hP : P ≤ N} {hQ : Q ≤ N}
(h : P.subtype hP = Q.subtype hQ) : P = Q := by
rw [SetLike.ext_iff] at h ⊢
exact fun g => ⟨fun hg => (h ⟨g, hP hg⟩).mp hg, fun hg => (h ⟨g, hQ hg⟩).mpr hg⟩
end Sylow
/-- A generalization of **Sylow's first theorem**.
Every `p`-subgroup is contained in a Sylow `p`-subgroup. -/
theorem IsPGroup.exists_le_sylow {P : Subgroup G} (hP : IsPGroup p P) : ∃ Q : Sylow p G, P ≤ Q :=
Exists.elim
(zorn_le_nonempty₀ { Q : Subgroup G | IsPGroup p Q }
(fun c hc1 hc2 Q hQ =>
⟨{ carrier := ⋃ R : c, R
one_mem' := ⟨Q, ⟨⟨Q, hQ⟩, rfl⟩, Q.one_mem⟩
inv_mem' := fun {_} ⟨_, ⟨R, rfl⟩, hg⟩ => ⟨R, ⟨R, rfl⟩, R.1.inv_mem hg⟩
mul_mem' := fun {_} _ ⟨_, ⟨R, rfl⟩, hg⟩ ⟨_, ⟨S, rfl⟩, hh⟩ =>
(hc2.total R.2 S.2).elim (fun T => ⟨S, ⟨S, rfl⟩, S.1.mul_mem (T hg) hh⟩) fun T =>
⟨R, ⟨R, rfl⟩, R.1.mul_mem hg (T hh)⟩ },
fun ⟨g, _, ⟨S, rfl⟩, hg⟩ => by
refine Exists.imp (fun k hk => ?_) (hc1 S.2 ⟨g, hg⟩)
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_pow] at hk ⊢, fun M hM _ hg => ⟨M, ⟨⟨M, hM⟩, rfl⟩, hg⟩⟩)
P hP)
fun {Q} h => ⟨⟨Q, h.2.prop, h.2.eq_of_ge⟩, h.1⟩
namespace Sylow
instance nonempty : Nonempty (Sylow p G) :=
nonempty_of_exists IsPGroup.of_bot.exists_le_sylow
noncomputable instance inhabited : Inhabited (Sylow p G) :=
Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty nonempty
theorem exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup {H : Type*} [Group H] (P : Sylow p H) {f : H →* G}
(hf : IsPGroup p f.ker) : ∃ Q : Sylow p G, Q.comap f = P :=
Exists.imp (fun Q hQ => P.3 (Q.2.comap_of_ker_isPGroup f hf) (map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hQ))
(P.2.map f).exists_le_sylow
theorem exists_comap_eq_of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (P : Sylow p H) {f : H →* G}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : ∃ Q : Sylow p G, Q.comap f = P :=
P.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup (IsPGroup.ker_isPGroup_of_injective hf)
theorem exists_comap_subtype_eq {H : Subgroup G} (P : Sylow p H) :
∃ Q : Sylow p G, Q.comap H.subtype = P :=
P.exists_comap_eq_of_injective Subtype.coe_injective
/-- If the kernel of `f : H →* G` is a `p`-group,
then `Finite (Sylow p G)` implies `Finite (Sylow p H)`. -/
theorem finite_of_ker_is_pGroup {H : Type*} [Group H] {f : H →* G}
(hf : IsPGroup p f.ker) [Finite (Sylow p G)] : Finite (Sylow p H) :=
let h_exists := fun P : Sylow p H => P.exists_comap_eq_of_ker_isPGroup hf
let g : Sylow p H → Sylow p G := fun P => Classical.choose (h_exists P)
have hg : ∀ P : Sylow p H, (g P).1.comap f = P := fun P => Classical.choose_spec (h_exists P)
Finite.of_injective g fun P Q h => ext (by rw [← hg, h]; exact (h_exists Q).choose_spec)
/-- If `f : H →* G` is injective, then `Finite (Sylow p G)` implies `Finite (Sylow p H)`. -/
theorem finite_of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] {f : H →* G}
(hf : Function.Injective f) [Finite (Sylow p G)] : Finite (Sylow p H) :=
finite_of_ker_is_pGroup (IsPGroup.ker_isPGroup_of_injective hf)
/-- If `H` is a subgroup of `G`, then `Finite (Sylow p G)` implies `Finite (Sylow p H)`. -/
instance (H : Subgroup G) [Finite (Sylow p G)] : Finite (Sylow p H) :=
finite_of_injective H.subtype_injective
open Pointwise
/-- `Subgroup.pointwiseMulAction` preserves Sylow subgroups. -/
instance pointwiseMulAction {α : Type*} [Group α] [MulDistribMulAction α G] :
MulAction α (Sylow p G) where
smul g P :=
⟨g • P.toSubgroup, P.2.map _, fun {Q} hQ hS =>
inv_smul_eq_iff.mp
(P.3 (hQ.map _) fun s hs =>
(congr_arg (· ∈ g⁻¹ • Q) (inv_smul_smul g s)).mp
(smul_mem_pointwise_smul (g • s) g⁻¹ Q (hS (smul_mem_pointwise_smul s g P hs))))⟩
one_smul P := ext (one_smul α P.toSubgroup)
mul_smul g h P := ext (mul_smul g h P.toSubgroup)
theorem pointwise_smul_def {α : Type*} [Group α] [MulDistribMulAction α G] {g : α}
{P : Sylow p G} : ↑(g • P) = g • (P : Subgroup G) :=
rfl
instance mulAction : MulAction G (Sylow p G) :=
compHom _ MulAut.conj
theorem smul_def {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} : g • P = MulAut.conj g • P :=
rfl
theorem coe_subgroup_smul {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} :
↑(g • P) = MulAut.conj g • (P : Subgroup G) :=
rfl
theorem coe_smul {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} : ↑(g • P) = MulAut.conj g • (P : Set G) :=
rfl
theorem smul_le {P : Sylow p G} {H : Subgroup G} (hP : P ≤ H) (h : H) : ↑(h • P) ≤ H :=
Subgroup.conj_smul_le_of_le hP h
theorem smul_subtype {P : Sylow p G} {H : Subgroup G} (hP : P ≤ H) (h : H) :
h • P.subtype hP = (h • P).subtype (smul_le hP h) :=
ext (Subgroup.conj_smul_subgroupOf hP h)
theorem smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} :
g • P = P ↔ g ∈ P.normalizer := by
rw [eq_comm, SetLike.ext_iff, ← inv_mem_iff (G := G) (H := normalizer P.toSubgroup),
mem_normalizer_iff, inv_inv]
exact
forall_congr' fun h =>
iff_congr Iff.rfl
⟨fun ⟨a, b, c⟩ => c ▸ by simpa [mul_assoc] using b,
fun hh => ⟨(MulAut.conj g)⁻¹ h, hh, MulAut.apply_inv_self G (MulAut.conj g) h⟩⟩
theorem smul_eq_of_normal {g : G} {P : Sylow p G} [h : P.Normal] :
g • P = P := by simp only [smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer, P.normalizer_eq_top, mem_top]
end Sylow
theorem Subgroup.sylow_mem_fixedPoints_iff (H : Subgroup G) {P : Sylow p G} :
P ∈ fixedPoints H (Sylow p G) ↔ H ≤ P.normalizer := by
simp_rw [SetLike.le_def, ← Sylow.smul_eq_iff_mem_normalizer]; exact Subtype.forall
theorem IsPGroup.inf_normalizer_sylow {P : Subgroup G} (hP : IsPGroup p P) (Q : Sylow p G) :
P ⊓ Q.normalizer = P ⊓ Q :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf inf_le_left
(sup_eq_right.mp
(Q.3 (hP.to_inf_left.to_sup_of_normal_right' Q.2 inf_le_right) le_sup_right)))
| (inf_le_inf_left P le_normalizer)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Sylow.lean | 271 | 272 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Comap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s :=
restrict_mono subset_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono h le_rfl
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (restrictₗ s).map_smul (c • 1) μ
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [Directed.measure_iUnion]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := .symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
/-- If a quasi measure preserving map `f` maps a set `s` to a set `t`,
then it is quasi measure preserving with respect to the restrictions of the measures. -/
theorem QuasiMeasurePreserving.restrict {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) {t : Set β} (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.restrict s) (ν.restrict t) where
measurable := hf.measurable
absolutelyContinuous := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun u hum ↦ ?_
suffices ν (u ∩ t) = 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ s) = 0 by simpa [hum, hf.measurable, hf.measurable hum]
refine fun hu ↦ measure_mono_null ?_ (hf.preimage_null hu)
rw [preimage_inter]
gcongr
assumption
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu]
induction u, hu using induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter with
| empty => simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
| basic u hu => exact ST_eq _ ht _ hu
| compl u hu ihu =>
have := T_eq t ht
rw [Set.inter_comm] at ihu ⊢
rwa [← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← ihu,
ENNReal.add_right_inj] at this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (htop t ht) (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)
| iUnion f hfd hfm ihf =>
simp only [← restrict_apply (hfm _), ← restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.iUnion hfm)] at ihf ⊢
simp only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm, ihf]
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : T.Countable) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ)
(htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s ≠ ∞) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter hU htop ?_ fun t ht => h_eq t (h_sub ht)
intro t ht s hs; rcases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H | H
· simp only [H, measure_empty]
· exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ hs _ (h_sub ht) H)
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `iUnion`.
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext` is a reformulation of this lemma. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion (C : Set (Set α)) (B : ℕ → Set α) (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h1B : ⋃ i, B i = univ) (h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) ≠ ∞)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset hA hC ?_ (countable_range B) h1B ?_ h_eq
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply h2B
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply hμB
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum_of_countable [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s := by
ext t ht
simp_rw [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_apply ht, sum_apply_of_countable]
lemma AbsolutelyContinuous.restrict (h : μ ≪ ν) (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s ≪ ν.restrict s := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun t ht htν ↦ ?_)
rw [restrict_apply ht] at htν ⊢
exact h htν
theorem restrict_iUnion_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd hm ht]
theorem restrict_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
restrict_iUnion_ae hd.aedisjoint fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_iUnion_le [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by simpa [ht, inter_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_le (t ∩ s ·)
end Measure
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_eq [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
le_antisymm ((ae_sum_eq fun i => μ.restrict (s i)) ▸ ae_mono restrict_iUnion_le) <|
iSup_le fun i => ae_mono <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion s i) le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_union_eq (s t : Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) = ae (μ.restrict s) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict t) := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_eq (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, ← iSup_subtype'']
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s t.countable_toSet
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_union_iff (s t : Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∪ t), p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, mem_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq s, mem_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, EventuallyEq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g :=
ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff s t.countable_toSet f g
open scoped Interval in
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_eq [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) :
ae (μ.restrict (Ι a b)) = ae (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, ae_restrict_union_eq]
open scoped Interval in
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), P x) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc a b), P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc b a), P x := by
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_eq, eventually_sup]
theorem ae_restrict_iff₀ {p : α → Prop} (hp : NullMeasurableSet { x | p x } (μ.restrict s)) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, Measure.restrict_apply₀ hp.compl]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff₀ hp.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_imp_of_ae_restrict {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff] at h ⊢
simpa [setOf_and, inter_comm] using measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict h
theorem ae_restrict_iff'₀ {p : α → Prop} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, restrict_apply₀' hs]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff' {p : α → Prop} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict {f g : α → δ} {s : Set α} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g := by
-- note that we cannot use `ae_restrict_iff` since we do not require measurability
refine hfg.filter_mono ?_
rw [Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous]
exact Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_mem₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
(ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs).2 (Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _ => id)
theorem ae_restrict_mem (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, x ∈ s :=
ae_restrict_mem₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_restrict_of_forall_mem {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
(ae_restrict_mem hs).mono h
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono Measure.restrict_le_self)
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset {s t : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x :=
h.filter_mono (ae_mono <| Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ))
theorem ae_of_ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_compl (t : Set α) {p : α → Prop}
(ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x) (htc : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict tᶜ, p x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <|
calc
μ { x | ¬p x } ≤ μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ t) + μ ({ x | ¬p x } ∩ tᶜ) :=
measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ.restrict t { x | ¬p x } + μ.restrict tᶜ { x | ¬p x } :=
add_le_add (le_restrict_apply _ _) (le_restrict_apply _ _)
_ = 0 := by rw [ae_iff.1 ht, ae_iff.1 htc, zero_add]
theorem mem_map_restrict_ae_iff {β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map f (ae (μ.restrict s)) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply' hs]
theorem ae_add_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {ν} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ + ν, p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, p x :=
add_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_comp' {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') (h2 : μ.map f ≪ ν) : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
(tendsto_ae_map hf).mono_right h2.ae_le h
theorem Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq_comp {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) (h : g =ᵐ[ν] g') : g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf.aemeasurable h hf.absolutelyContinuous
theorem ae_eq_comp {f : α → β} {g g' : β → δ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : g =ᵐ[μ.map f] g') :
g ∘ f =ᵐ[μ] g' ∘ f :=
ae_eq_comp' hf h AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ae_eq_one {β} [Group β] (f g : α → β) : f / g =ᵐ[μ] 1 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one] at hx
· rwa [Pi.div_apply, Pi.one_apply, div_eq_one]
@[to_additive sub_nonneg_ae]
lemma one_le_div_ae {β : Type*} [Group β] [LE β] [MulRightMono β] (f g : α → β) :
1 ≤ᵐ[μ] g / f ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono fun a ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div'] at ha
· rwa [Pi.one_apply, Pi.div_apply, one_le_div']
theorem le_ae_restrict : ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ ae (μ.restrict s) := fun _s hs =>
eventually_inf_principal.2 (ae_imp_of_ae_restrict hs)
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ae (μ.restrict s) = ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext t
simp only [mem_inf_principal, mem_ae_iff, restrict_apply_eq_zero' hs, compl_setOf,
Classical.not_imp, fun a => and_comm (a := a ∈ s) (b := ¬a ∈ t)]
rfl
lemma ae_restrict_le : ae (μ.restrict s) ≤ ae μ :=
ae_mono restrict_le_self
theorem ae_restrict_eq_bot {s} : ae (μ.restrict s) = ⊥ ↔ μ s = 0 :=
ae_eq_bot.trans restrict_eq_zero
theorem ae_restrict_neBot {s} : (ae <| μ.restrict s).NeBot ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans ae_restrict_eq_bot.not
theorem self_mem_ae_restrict {s} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : s ∈ ae (μ.restrict s) := by
simp only [ae_restrict_eq hs, exists_prop, mem_principal, mem_inf_iff]
exact ⟨_, univ_mem, s, Subset.rfl, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp [Measure.restrict_congr_set hst]
/-- If two measurable sets are ae_eq then any proposition that is almost everywhere true on one
is almost everywhere true on the other -/
theorem ae_restrict_congr_set {s t} (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x :=
⟨ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst, ae_restrict_of_ae_eq_of_ae_restrict hst.symm⟩
lemma NullMeasurable.measure_preimage_eq_measure_restrict_preimage_of_ae_compl_eq_const
{β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {b : β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(f_mble : NullMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hs : f =ᵐ[Measure.restrict μ sᶜ] (fun _ ↦ b))
{t : Set β} (t_mble : MeasurableSet t) (ht : b ∉ t) :
μ (f ⁻¹' t) = μ.restrict s (f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [Measure.restrict_apply₀ (f_mble t_mble)]
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Measure.restrict_apply₀] at hs
· apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono inter_subset_left)
apply (measure_mono (Eq.symm (inter_union_compl (f ⁻¹' t) s)).le).trans
apply (measure_union_le _ _).trans
have obs : μ ((f ⁻¹' t) ∩ sᶜ) = 0 := by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← hs]
apply measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ _)
intro x hx hfx
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_setOf_eq] at hx hfx
exact ht (hfx ▸ hx)
simp only [obs, add_zero, le_refl]
· exact NullMeasurableSet.of_null hs
namespace Measure
section Subtype
/-! ### Subtype of a measure space -/
section ComapAnyMeasure
theorem MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) : NullMeasurableSet ((↑) '' t) μ := by
rw [Subtype.instMeasurableSpace, comap_eq_generateFrom] at ht
induction t, ht using generateFrom_induction with
| hC t' ht' =>
obtain ⟨s', hs', rfl⟩ := ht'
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
exact hs.inter (hs'.nullMeasurableSet)
| empty => simp only [image_empty, nullMeasurableSet_empty]
| compl t' _ ht' =>
simp only [← range_diff_image Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
exact hs.diff ht'
| iUnion f _ hf =>
dsimp only []
rw [image_iUnion]
exact .iUnion hf
theorem NullMeasurableSet.subtype_coe {t : Set s} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.comap Subtype.val)) : NullMeasurableSet (((↑) : s → α) '' t) μ :=
NullMeasurableSet.image _ μ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun _ => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) ht
theorem measure_subtype_coe_le_comap (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set s) :
μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) ≤ μ.comap Subtype.val t :=
le_comap_apply _ _ Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs) _
theorem measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) {t : Set s}
(ht : μ.comap Subtype.val t = 0) : μ (((↑) : s → α) '' t) = 0 :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr <| (measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hs t).trans ht.le
end ComapAnyMeasure
section MeasureSpace
variable {u : Set δ} [MeasureSpace δ] {p : δ → Prop}
/-- In a measure space, one can restrict the measure to a subtype to get a new measure space.
Not registered as an instance, as there are other natural choices such as the normalized restriction
for a probability measure, or the subspace measure when restricting to a vector subspace. Enable
locally if needed with `attribute [local instance] Measure.Subtype.measureSpace`. -/
noncomputable def Subtype.measureSpace : MeasureSpace (Subtype p) where
volume := Measure.comap Subtype.val volume
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem Subtype.volume_def : (volume : Measure u) = volume.comap Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem Subtype.volume_univ (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) : volume (univ : Set u) = volume u := by
rw [Subtype.volume_def, comap_apply₀ _ _ _ _ MeasurableSet.univ.nullMeasurableSet]
· congr
simp only [image_univ, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
· exact Subtype.coe_injective
· exact fun t => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hu
theorem volume_subtype_coe_le_volume (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) (t : Set u) :
volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) ≤ volume t :=
measure_subtype_coe_le_comap hu t
theorem volume_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_volume_eq_zero (hu : NullMeasurableSet u) {t : Set u}
(ht : volume t = 0) : volume (((↑) : u → δ) '' t) = 0 :=
measure_subtype_coe_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero hu ht
end MeasureSpace
end Subtype
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory Measure
namespace MeasurableEmbedding
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m1 : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
section
variable (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
include hf
theorem map_comap (μ : Measure β) : (comap f μ).map f = μ.restrict (range f) := by
ext1 t ht
rw [hf.map_apply, comap_apply f hf.injective hf.measurableSet_image' _ (hf.measurable ht),
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
theorem comap_apply (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
calc
comap f μ s = comap f μ (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) := by rw [hf.injective.preimage_image]
_ = (comap f μ).map f (f '' s) := (hf.map_apply _ _).symm
_ = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (image_subset_range _ _)]
theorem comap_map (μ : Measure α) : (map f μ).comap f = μ := by
ext t _
rw [hf.comap_apply, hf.map_apply, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
theorem ae_map_iff {p : β → Prop} {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.map f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) := by
simp only [ae_iff, hf.map_apply, preimage_setOf_eq]
theorem restrict_map (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
Measure.ext fun t ht => by simp [hf.map_apply, ht, hf.measurable ht]
protected theorem comap_preimage (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [← hf.map_apply, hf.map_comap, restrict_apply' hf.measurableSet_range]
lemma comap_restrict (μ : Measure β) (s : Set β) :
(μ.restrict s).comap f = (μ.comap f).restrict (f ⁻¹' s) := by
ext t ht
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, comap_apply hf, comap_apply hf,
Measure.restrict_apply (hf.measurableSet_image.2 ht), image_inter_preimage]
lemma restrict_comap (μ : Measure β) (s : Set α) :
(μ.comap f).restrict s = (μ.restrict (f '' s)).comap f := by
rw [comap_restrict hf, preimage_image_eq _ hf.injective]
end
theorem _root_.MeasurableEquiv.restrict_map (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set β) :
(μ.map e).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| e ⁻¹' s).map e :=
e.measurableEmbedding.restrict_map _ _
end MeasurableEmbedding
section Subtype
theorem comap_subtype_coe_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) (t : Set s) : comap (↑) μ t = μ ((↑) '' t) :=
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).comap_apply _ _
theorem map_comap_subtype_coe {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure α) : (comap (↑) μ).map ((↑) : s → α) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem ae_restrict_iff_subtype {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ (x : s) ∂comap ((↑) : s → α) μ, p x := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).ae_map_iff]
variable [MeasureSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-!
### Volume on `s : Set α`
Note the instance is provided earlier as `Subtype.measureSpace`.
-/
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace
theorem volume_set_coe_def (s : Set α) : (volume : Measure s) = comap ((↑) : s → α) volume :=
rfl
theorem MeasurableSet.map_coe_volume {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
volume.map ((↑) : s → α) = restrict volume s := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).map_comap volume, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem volume_image_subtype_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set s) :
volume ((↑) '' t : Set α) = volume t :=
(comap_subtype_coe_apply hs volume t).symm
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_coe (hs : NullMeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
volume (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = volume (t ∩ s) := by
rw [volume_set_coe_def,
comap_apply₀ _ _ Subtype.coe_injective
(fun h => MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet_subtype_coe hs)
(measurable_subtype_coe ht).nullMeasurableSet,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
end Subtype
section Piecewise
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f g : α → β}
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs]
exact (piecewise_eqOn s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_restrict_compl [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
piecewise s f g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] g := by
rw [ae_restrict_eq hs.compl]
exact (piecewise_eqOn_compl s f g).eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right
theorem piecewise_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)]
(hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : s.piecewise f g =ᵐ[μ] t.piecewise f g :=
hst.mem_iff.mono fun x hx => by simp [piecewise, hx]
end Piecewise
section IndicatorFunction
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_mem_map_restrict_ae_of_zero_mem [Zero β] {t : Set β}
(ht : (0 : β) ∈ t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ t ∈ Filter.map f (ae <| μ.restrict s) := by
classical
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite]
simp_rw [Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∩ s) = 0
simp only [ht, ← Set.compl_eq_univ_diff, compl_compl, Set.compl_union, if_true,
Set.preimage_const]
simp_rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right, Set.compl_inter_self s, Set.union_empty]
theorem mem_map_indicator_ae_iff_of_zero_nmem [Zero β] {t : Set β} (ht : (0 : β) ∉ t) :
t ∈ Filter.map (s.indicator f) (ae μ) ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0 := by
classical
rw [mem_map, mem_ae_iff, Set.indicator_preimage, Set.ite, Set.compl_union, Set.compl_inter]
change μ (((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) ∩ ((fun _ => (0 : β)) ⁻¹' t \ s)ᶜ) = 0 ↔ μ ((f ⁻¹' t)ᶜ ∪ sᶜ) = 0
| simp only [ht, if_false, Set.compl_empty, Set.empty_diff, Set.inter_univ, Set.preimage_const]
theorem map_restrict_ae_le_map_indicator_ae [Zero β] (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 921 | 923 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
/-!
# Marginals of multivariate functions
In this file, we define a convenient way to compute integrals of multivariate functions, especially
if you want to write expressions where you integrate only over some of the variables that the
function depends on. This is common in induction arguments involving integrals of multivariate
functions.
This constructions allows working with iterated integrals and applying Tonelli's theorem
and Fubini's theorem, without using measurable equivalences by changing the representation of your
space (e.g. `((ι ⊕ ι') → ℝ) ≃ (ι → ℝ) × (ι' → ℝ)`).
## Main Definitions
* Assume that `∀ i : ι, X i` is a product of measurable spaces with measures `μ i` on `X i`,
`f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞` is a function and `s : Finset ι`.
Then `lmarginal μ s f` or `∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ` is the function that integrates `f`
over all variables in `s`. It returns a function that still takes the same variables as `f`,
but is constant in the variables in `s`. Mathematically, if `s = {i₁, ..., iₖ}`,
then `lmarginal μ s f` is the expression
$$
\vec{x}\mapsto \int\!\!\cdots\!\!\int f(\vec{x}[\vec{y}])dy_{i_1}\cdots dy_{i_k}.
$$
where $\vec{x}[\vec{y}]$ is the vector $\vec{x}$ with $x_{i_j}$ replaced by $y_{i_j}$ for all
$1 \le j \le k$.
If `f` is the distribution of a random variable, this is the marginal distribution of all
variables not in `s` (but not the most general notion, since we only consider product measures
here).
Note that the notation `∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ` is not a binder, and returns a function.
## Main Results
* `lmarginal_union` is the analogue of Tonelli's theorem for iterated integrals. It states that
for measurable functions `f` and disjoint finsets `s` and `t` we have
`∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ`.
## Implementation notes
The function `f` can have an arbitrary product as its domain (even infinite products), but the
set `s` of integration variables is a `Finset`. We are assuming that the function `f` is measurable
for most of this file. Note that asking whether it is `AEMeasurable` is not even well-posed,
since there is no well-behaved measure on the domain of `f`.
## TODO
* Define the marginal function for functions taking values in a Banach space.
-/
open scoped ENNReal
open Set Function Equiv Finset
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
section LMarginal
variable {δ δ' : Type*} {X : δ → Type*} [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (X i)]
variable {μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)} [DecidableEq δ]
variable {s t : Finset δ} {f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} {x : ∀ i, X i}
/-- Integrate `f(x₁,…,xₙ)` over all variables `xᵢ` where `i ∈ s`. Return a function in the
remaining variables (it will be constant in the `xᵢ` for `i ∈ s`).
This is the marginal distribution of all variables not in `s` when the considered measure
is the product measure. -/
def lmarginal (μ : ∀ i, Measure (X i)) (s : Finset δ) (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(x : ∀ i, X i) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ y : ∀ i : s, X i, f (updateFinset x s y) ∂Measure.pi fun i : s => μ i
-- Note: this notation is not a binder. This is more convenient since it returns a function.
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f " ∂" μ:70 => lmarginal μ s f
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f => lmarginal (fun _ ↦ volume) s f
variable (μ)
theorem _root_.Measurable.lmarginal [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) := by
refine Measurable.lintegral_prod_right ?_
refine hf.comp ?_
rw [measurable_pi_iff]; intro i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· simpa [hi, updateFinset] using measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_snd _
· simpa [hi, updateFinset] using measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_fst _
@[simp] theorem lmarginal_empty (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⋯∫⁻_∅, f ∂μ = f := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [lmarginal, Measure.pi_of_empty fun i : (∅ : Finset δ) => μ i]
apply lintegral_dirac'
exact Subsingleton.measurable
/-- The marginal distribution is independent of the variables in `s`. -/
theorem lmarginal_congr {x y : ∀ i, X i} (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ i ∉ s, x i = y i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) y := by
dsimp [lmarginal, updateFinset_def]; rcongr; exact h _ ‹_›
theorem lmarginal_update_of_mem {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ s)
(f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, X i) (y : X i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i y) = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x := by
apply lmarginal_congr
intro j hj
have : j ≠ i := by rintro rfl; exact hj hi
apply update_of_ne this
variable {μ} in
theorem lmarginal_singleton (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (i : δ) :
∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ = fun x => ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by
let α : Type _ := ({i} : Finset δ)
let e := (MeasurableEquiv.piUnique fun j : α ↦ X j).symm
ext1 x
calc (∫⋯∫⁻_{i}, f ∂μ) x
= ∫⁻ (y : X (default : α)), f (updateFinset x {i} (e y)) ∂μ (default : α) := by
simp_rw [lmarginal,
measurePreserving_piUnique (fun j : ({i} : Finset δ) ↦ μ j) |>.symm _
|>.lintegral_map_equiv, e, α]
_ = ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by simp [update_eq_updateFinset]; rfl
variable {μ} in
@[gcongr]
theorem lmarginal_mono {f g : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ≤ ∫⋯∫⁻_s, g ∂μ :=
fun _ => lintegral_mono fun _ => hfg _
variable [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)]
theorem lmarginal_union (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f)
(hst : Disjoint s t) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ := by
ext1 x
let e := MeasurableEquiv.piFinsetUnion X hst
calc (∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ) x
= ∫⁻ (y : (i : ↥(s ∪ t)) → X i), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) y)
∂.pi fun i' : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ μ i' := rfl
_ = ∫⁻ (y : ((i : s) → X i) × ((j : t) → X j)), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) _)
∂(Measure.pi fun i : s ↦ μ i).prod (.pi fun j : t ↦ μ j) := by
rw [measurePreserving_piFinsetUnion hst μ |>.lintegral_map_equiv]
_ = ∫⁻ (y : (i : s) → X i), ∫⁻ (z : (j : t) → X j), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) (e (y, z)))
∂.pi fun j : t ↦ μ j ∂.pi fun i : s ↦ μ i := by
apply lintegral_prod
apply Measurable.aemeasurable
exact hf.comp <| measurable_updateFinset.comp e.measurable
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ) x := by
simp_rw [lmarginal, updateFinset_updateFinset hst]
rfl
theorem lmarginal_union' (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {s t : Finset δ}
(hst : Disjoint s t) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_t, ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ∂μ := by
rw [Finset.union_comm, lmarginal_union μ f hf hst.symm]
variable {μ}
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the beginning (compare with
`lmarginal_insert'`, which peels off an integral at the end). -/
theorem lmarginal_insert (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∉ s) (x : ∀ i, X i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ) x = ∫⁻ xᵢ, (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by
rw [Finset.insert_eq, lmarginal_union μ f hf (Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr hi),
lmarginal_singleton]
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the beginning (compare with
`lmarginal_erase'`, which peels off an integral at the end). -/
theorem lmarginal_erase (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∈ s) (x : ∀ i, X i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x = ∫⁻ xᵢ, (∫⋯∫⁻_(erase s i), f ∂μ) (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i := by
simpa [insert_erase hi] using lmarginal_insert _ hf (not_mem_erase i s) x
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the end (compare with
`lmarginal_insert`, which peels off an integral at the beginning). -/
theorem lmarginal_insert' (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∉ s) :
∫⋯∫⁻_insert i s, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ∂μ := by
rw [Finset.insert_eq, Finset.union_comm,
lmarginal_union (s := s) μ f hf (Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr hi), lmarginal_singleton]
/-- Peel off a single integral from a `lmarginal` integral at the end (compare with
`lmarginal_erase`, which peels off an integral at the beginning). -/
theorem lmarginal_erase' (f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {i : δ}
(hi : i ∈ s) :
∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_(erase s i), (fun x ↦ ∫⁻ xᵢ, f (Function.update x i xᵢ) ∂μ i) ∂μ := by
simpa [insert_erase hi] using lmarginal_insert' _ hf (not_mem_erase i s)
@[simp] theorem lmarginal_univ [Fintype δ] {f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} :
∫⋯∫⁻_univ, f ∂μ = fun _ => ∫⁻ x, f x ∂Measure.pi μ := by
let e : { j // j ∈ Finset.univ } ≃ δ := Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv mem_univ
ext1 x
simp_rw [lmarginal, measurePreserving_piCongrLeft μ e |>.lintegral_map_equiv, updateFinset_def]
simp
rfl
theorem lintegral_eq_lmarginal_univ [Fintype δ] {f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} (x : ∀ i, X i) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂Measure.pi μ = (∫⋯∫⁻_univ, f ∂μ) x := by simp
theorem lmarginal_image [DecidableEq δ'] {e : δ' → δ} (he : Injective e) (s : Finset δ')
{f : (∀ i, X (e i)) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (x : ∀ i, X i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s.image e, f ∘ (· ∘' e) ∂μ) x = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ∘' e) (x ∘' e) := by
have h : Measurable ((· ∘' e) : (∀ i, X i) → _) :=
measurable_pi_iff.mpr <| fun i ↦ measurable_pi_apply (e i)
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing x with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hi ih =>
rw [image_insert, lmarginal_insert _ (hf.comp h) (he.mem_finset_image.not.mpr hi),
lmarginal_insert _ hf hi]
simp_rw [ih, ← update_comp_eq_of_injective' x he]
theorem lmarginal_update_of_not_mem {i : δ}
{f : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hi : i ∉ s) (x : ∀ i, X i) (y : X i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i y) = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∘ (Function.update · i y) ∂μ) x := by
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing x with
| empty => simp
| insert i' s hi' ih =>
rw [lmarginal_insert _ hf hi', lmarginal_insert _ (hf.comp measurable_update_left) hi']
have hii' : i ≠ i' := mt (by rintro rfl; exact mem_insert_self i s) hi
simp_rw [update_comm hii', ih (mt Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
theorem lmarginal_eq_of_subset {f g : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (hfg : ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, g ∂μ) :
∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_t, g ∂μ := by
rw [← union_sdiff_of_subset hst, lmarginal_union' μ f hf disjoint_sdiff,
lmarginal_union' μ g hg disjoint_sdiff, hfg]
|
theorem lmarginal_le_of_subset {f g : (∀ i, X i) → ℝ≥0∞} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (hfg : ∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ ≤ ∫⋯∫⁻_s, g ∂μ) :
∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ≤ ∫⋯∫⁻_t, g ∂μ := by
rw [← union_sdiff_of_subset hst, lmarginal_union' μ f hf disjoint_sdiff,
lmarginal_union' μ g hg disjoint_sdiff]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Marginal.lean | 229 | 234 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Polynomials supported by a set of variables
This file contains the definition and lemmas about `MvPolynomial.supported`.
## Main definitions
* `MvPolynomial.supported` : Given a set `s : Set σ`, `supported R s` is the subalgebra of
`MvPolynomial σ R` consisting of polynomials whose set of variables is contained in `s`.
This subalgebra is isomorphic to `MvPolynomial s R`.
## Tags
variables, polynomial, vars
-/
universe u v w
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {R : Type u}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p : MvPolynomial σ R}
variable (R) in
/-- The set of polynomials whose variables are contained in `s` as a `Subalgebra` over `R`. -/
noncomputable def supported (s : Set σ) : Subalgebra R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Algebra.adjoin R (X '' s)
open Algebra
theorem supported_eq_range_rename (s : Set σ) : supported R s = (rename ((↑) : s → σ)).range := by
rw [supported, Set.image_eq_range, adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, rename]
congr
/-- The isomorphism between the subalgebra of polynomials supported by `s` and
`MvPolynomial s R`. -/
noncomputable def supportedEquivMvPolynomial (s : Set σ) : supported R s ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial s R :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ (supported_eq_range_rename s)).trans
(AlgEquiv.ofInjective (rename ((↑) : s → σ)) (rename_injective _ Subtype.val_injective)).symm
@[simp]
theorem supportedEquivMvPolynomial_symm_C (s : Set σ) (x : R) :
(supportedEquivMvPolynomial s).symm (C x) = algebraMap R (supported R s) x := by
ext1
simp [supportedEquivMvPolynomial, MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq]
@[simp]
theorem supportedEquivMvPolynomial_symm_X (s : Set σ) (i : s) :
(↑((supportedEquivMvPolynomial s).symm (X i : MvPolynomial s R)) : MvPolynomial σ R) = X ↑i :=
by simp [supportedEquivMvPolynomial]
variable {s t : Set σ}
theorem mem_supported : p ∈ supported R s ↔ ↑p.vars ⊆ s := by
classical
rw [supported_eq_range_rename, AlgHom.mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩
refine _root_.trans (Finset.coe_subset.2 (vars_rename _ _)) ?_
simp
· intro hs
exact exists_rename_eq_of_vars_subset_range p ((↑) : s → σ) Subtype.val_injective (by simpa)
theorem supported_eq_vars_subset : (supported R s : Set (MvPolynomial σ R)) = { p | ↑p.vars ⊆ s } :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ mem_supported
@[simp]
theorem mem_supported_vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p ∈ supported R (↑p.vars : Set σ) := by
rw [mem_supported]
variable (s)
theorem supported_eq_adjoin_X : supported R s = Algebra.adjoin R (X '' s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem supported_univ : supported R (Set.univ : Set σ) = ⊤ := by
simp [Algebra.eq_top_iff, mem_supported]
@[simp]
theorem supported_empty : supported R (∅ : Set σ) = ⊥ := by simp [supported_eq_adjoin_X]
|
variable {s}
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Supported.lean | 91 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.ListTraverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Topology on lists and vectors
-/
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter
open Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
instance : TopologicalSpace (List α) :=
TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds (traverse nhds)
theorem nhds_list (as : List α) : 𝓝 as = traverse 𝓝 as := by
refine nhds_mkOfNhds _ _ ?_ ?_
· intro l
induction l with
| nil => exact le_rfl
| cons a l ih =>
suffices List.cons <$> pure a <*> pure l ≤ List.cons <$> 𝓝 a <*> traverse 𝓝 l by
simpa only [functor_norm] using this
exact Filter.seq_mono (Filter.map_mono <| pure_le_nhds a) ih
· intro l s hs
rcases (mem_traverse_iff _ _).1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hus⟩
clear as hs
have : ∃ v : List (Set α), l.Forall₂ (fun a s => IsOpen s ∧ a ∈ s) v ∧ sequence v ⊆ s := by
induction hu generalizing s with
| nil =>
exists []
simp only [List.forall₂_nil_left_iff, exists_eq_left]
exact ⟨trivial, hus⟩
| cons ht _ ih =>
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hut, hu⟩
rcases ih _ Subset.rfl with ⟨v, hv, hvss⟩
exact
⟨u::v, List.Forall₂.cons hu hv,
Subset.trans (Set.seq_mono (Set.image_subset _ hut) hvss) hus⟩
rcases this with ⟨v, hv, hvs⟩
have : sequence v ∈ traverse 𝓝 l :=
mem_traverse _ _ <| hv.imp fun a s ⟨hs, ha⟩ => IsOpen.mem_nhds hs ha
refine mem_of_superset this fun u hu ↦ ?_
have hu := (List.mem_traverse _ _).1 hu
have : List.Forall₂ (fun a s => IsOpen s ∧ a ∈ s) u v := by
refine List.Forall₂.flip ?_
replace hv := hv.flip
simp only [List.forall₂_and_left, Function.flip_def] at hv ⊢
exact ⟨hv.1, hu.flip⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ hvs
exact mem_traverse _ _ (this.imp fun a s ⟨hs, ha⟩ => IsOpen.mem_nhds hs ha)
@[simp]
theorem nhds_nil : 𝓝 ([] : List α) = pure [] := by
rw [nhds_list, List.traverse_nil _]
theorem nhds_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : 𝓝 (a::l) = List.cons <$> 𝓝 a <*> 𝓝 l := by
rw [nhds_list, List.traverse_cons _, ← nhds_list]
theorem List.tendsto_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
Tendsto (fun p : α × List α => List.cons p.1 p.2) (𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 l) (𝓝 (a::l)) := by
rw [nhds_cons, Tendsto, Filter.map_prod]; exact le_rfl
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cons {α : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : α → List β} {a : Filter α} {b : β}
{l : List β} (hf : Tendsto f a (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto g a (𝓝 l)) :
Tendsto (fun a => List.cons (f a) (g a)) a (𝓝 (b::l)) :=
List.tendsto_cons.comp (Tendsto.prodMk hf hg)
namespace List
theorem tendsto_cons_iff {β : Type*} {f : List α → β} {b : Filter β} {a : α} {l : List α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 (a::l)) b ↔ Tendsto (fun p : α × List α => f (p.1::p.2)) (𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 l) b := by
have : 𝓝 (a::l) = (𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 l).map fun p : α × List α => p.1::p.2 := by
simp only [nhds_cons, Filter.prod_eq, (Filter.map_def _ _).symm,
(Filter.seq_eq_filter_seq _ _).symm]
simp [-Filter.map_def, Function.comp_def, functor_norm]
rw [this, Filter.tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem continuous_cons : Continuous fun x : α × List α => (x.1::x.2 : List α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun ⟨_x, _y⟩ => continuousAt_fst.cons continuousAt_snd
theorem tendsto_nhds {β : Type*} {f : List α → β} {r : List α → Filter β}
(h_nil : Tendsto f (pure []) (r []))
(h_cons :
∀ l a,
Tendsto f (𝓝 l) (r l) →
Tendsto (fun p : α × List α => f (p.1::p.2)) (𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 l) (r (a::l))) :
∀ l, Tendsto f (𝓝 l) (r l)
| [] => by rwa [nhds_nil]
| a::l => by
rw [tendsto_cons_iff]; exact h_cons l a (@tendsto_nhds _ _ _ h_nil h_cons l)
instance [DiscreteTopology α] : DiscreteTopology (List α) := by
rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds]; intro l; induction l <;> simp [*, nhds_cons]
theorem continuousAt_length : ∀ l : List α, ContinuousAt List.length l := by
simp only [ContinuousAt, nhds_discrete]
refine tendsto_nhds ?_ ?_
· exact tendsto_pure_pure _ _
· intro l a ih
dsimp only [List.length]
refine Tendsto.comp (tendsto_pure_pure (fun x => x + 1) _) ?_
exact Tendsto.comp ih tendsto_snd
/-- Continuity of `insertIdx` in terms of `Tendsto`. -/
theorem tendsto_insertIdx' {a : α} :
∀ {n : ℕ} {l : List α},
Tendsto (fun p : α × List α => p.2.insertIdx n p.1) (𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 l) (𝓝 (l.insertIdx n a))
| 0, _ => tendsto_cons
| n + 1, [] => by simp
| n + 1, a'::l => by
have : 𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 (a'::l) =
(𝓝 a ×ˢ (𝓝 a' ×ˢ 𝓝 l)).map fun p : α × α × List α => (p.1, p.2.1::p.2.2) := by
simp only [nhds_cons, Filter.prod_eq, ← Filter.map_def, ← Filter.seq_eq_filter_seq]
simp [-Filter.map_def, Function.comp_def, functor_norm]
rw [this, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact
(tendsto_fst.comp tendsto_snd).cons
((@tendsto_insertIdx' _ n l).comp <| tendsto_fst.prodMk <| tendsto_snd.comp tendsto_snd)
theorem tendsto_insertIdx {β} {n : ℕ} {a : α} {l : List α} {f : β → α} {g : β → List α}
{b : Filter β} (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 l)) :
Tendsto (fun b : β => (g b).insertIdx n (f b)) b (𝓝 (l.insertIdx n a)) :=
tendsto_insertIdx'.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem continuous_insertIdx {n : ℕ} : Continuous fun p : α × List α => p.2.insertIdx n p.1 :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun ⟨a, l⟩ => by
rw [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq]; exact tendsto_insertIdx'
theorem tendsto_eraseIdx :
∀ {n : ℕ} {l : List α}, Tendsto (eraseIdx · n) (𝓝 l) (𝓝 (eraseIdx l n))
| _, [] => by rw [nhds_nil]; exact tendsto_pure_nhds _ _
| 0, a::l => by rw [tendsto_cons_iff]; exact tendsto_snd
| n + 1, a::l => by
rw [tendsto_cons_iff]
dsimp [eraseIdx]
exact tendsto_fst.cons ((@tendsto_eraseIdx n l).comp tendsto_snd)
theorem continuous_eraseIdx {n : ℕ} : Continuous fun l : List α => eraseIdx l n :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun _a => tendsto_eraseIdx
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_prod [MulOneClass α] [ContinuousMul α] {l : List α} :
Tendsto List.prod (𝓝 l) (𝓝 l.prod) := by
induction l with
| | nil => simp +contextual [nhds_nil, mem_of_mem_nhds, tendsto_pure_left]
| cons x l ih =>
simp_rw [tendsto_cons_iff, prod_cons]
have := continuous_iff_continuousAt.mp continuous_mul (x, l.prod)
rw [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq] at this
exact this.comp (tendsto_id.prodMap ih)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/List.lean | 156 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Felix Weilacher. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.PiNat
/-!
# (Topological) Schemes and their induced maps
In topology, and especially descriptive set theory, one often constructs functions `(ℕ → β) → α`,
where α is some topological space and β is a discrete space, as an appropriate limit of some map
`List β → Set α`. We call the latter type of map a "`β`-scheme on `α`".
This file develops the basic, abstract theory of these schemes and the functions they induce.
## Main Definitions
* `CantorScheme.inducedMap A` : The aforementioned "limit" of a scheme `A : List β → Set α`.
This is a partial function from `ℕ → β` to `a`,
implemented here as an object of type `Σ s : Set (ℕ → β), s → α`.
That is, `(inducedMap A).1` is the domain and `(inducedMap A).2` is the function.
## Implementation Notes
We consider end-appending to be the fundamental way to build lists (say on `β`) inductively,
as this interacts better with the topology on `ℕ → β`.
As a result, functions like `List.get?` or `Stream'.take` do not have their intended meaning
in this file. See instead `PiNat.res`.
## References
* [kechris1995] (Chapters 6-7)
## Tags
scheme, cantor scheme, lusin scheme, approximation.
-/
namespace CantorScheme
open List Function Filter Set PiNat Topology
variable {β α : Type*} (A : List β → Set α)
/-- From a `β`-scheme on `α` `A`, we define a partial function from `(ℕ → β)` to `α`
which sends each infinite sequence `x` to an element of the intersection along the
branch corresponding to `x`, if it exists.
We call this the map induced by the scheme. -/
noncomputable def inducedMap : Σs : Set (ℕ → β), s → α :=
⟨fun x => Set.Nonempty (⋂ n : ℕ, A (res x n)), fun x => x.property.some⟩
section Topology
/-- A scheme is antitone if each set contains its children. -/
protected def Antitone : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, ∀ a : β, A (a :: l) ⊆ A l
/-- A useful strengthening of being antitone is to require that each set contains
the closure of each of its children. -/
def ClosureAntitone [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, ∀ a : β, closure (A (a :: l)) ⊆ A l
/-- A scheme is disjoint if the children of each set of pairwise disjoint. -/
protected def Disjoint : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, Pairwise fun a b => Disjoint (A (a :: l)) (A (b :: l))
variable {A}
/-- If `x` is in the domain of the induced map of a scheme `A`,
its image under this map is in each set along the corresponding branch. -/
theorem map_mem (x : (inducedMap A).1) (n : ℕ) : (inducedMap A).2 x ∈ A (res x n) := by
have := x.property.some_mem
rw [mem_iInter] at this
exact this n
protected theorem ClosureAntitone.antitone [TopologicalSpace α] (hA : ClosureAntitone A) :
CantorScheme.Antitone A := fun l a => subset_closure.trans (hA l a)
protected theorem Antitone.closureAntitone [TopologicalSpace α] (hanti : CantorScheme.Antitone A)
(hclosed : ∀ l, IsClosed (A l)) : ClosureAntitone A := fun _ _ =>
(hclosed _).closure_eq.subset.trans (hanti _ _)
/-- A scheme where the children of each set are pairwise disjoint induces an injective map. -/
theorem Disjoint.map_injective (hA : CantorScheme.Disjoint A) : Injective (inducedMap A).2 := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
refine Subtype.coe_injective (res_injective ?_)
dsimp
ext n : 1
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨?_, ih⟩
contrapose hA
simp only [CantorScheme.Disjoint, _root_.Pairwise, Ne, not_forall, exists_prop]
refine ⟨res x n, _, _, hA, ?_⟩
| rw [not_disjoint_iff]
refine ⟨(inducedMap A).2 ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← res_succ]
apply map_mem
rw [hxy, ih, ← res_succ]
apply map_mem
end Topology
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- A scheme on a metric space has vanishing diameter if diameter approaches 0 along each branch. -/
def VanishingDiam : Prop :=
∀ x : ℕ → β, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => EMetric.diam (A (res x n))) atTop (𝓝 0)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/CantorScheme.lean | 99 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Composition
/-!
# Composition of analytic functions
In this file we prove that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
The argument is the following. Assume `g z = ∑' qₙ (z, ..., z)` and `f y = ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y)`. Then
`g (f y) = ∑' qₙ (∑' pₖ (y, ..., y), ..., ∑' pₖ (y, ..., y))
= ∑' qₙ (p_{i₁} (y, ..., y), ..., p_{iₙ} (y, ..., y))`.
For each `n` and `i₁, ..., iₙ`, define a `i₁ + ... + iₙ` multilinear function mapping
`(y₀, ..., y_{i₁ + ... + iₙ - 1})` to
`qₙ (p_{i₁} (y₀, ..., y_{i₁-1}), p_{i₂} (y_{i₁}, ..., y_{i₁ + i₂ - 1}), ..., p_{iₙ} (....)))`.
Then `g ∘ f` is obtained by summing all these multilinear functions.
To formalize this, we use compositions of an integer `N`, i.e., its decompositions into
a sum `i₁ + ... + iₙ` of positive integers. Given such a composition `c` and two formal
multilinear series `q` and `p`, let `q.compAlongComposition p c` be the above multilinear
function. Then the `N`-th coefficient in the power series expansion of `g ∘ f` is the sum of these
terms over all `c : Composition N`.
To complete the proof, we need to show that this power series has a positive radius of convergence.
This follows from the fact that `Composition N` has cardinality `2^(N-1)` and estimates on
the norm of `qₙ` and `pₖ`, which give summability. We also need to show that it indeed converges to
`g ∘ f`. For this, we note that the composition of partial sums converges to `g ∘ f`, and that it
corresponds to a part of the whole sum, on a subset that increases to the whole space. By
summability of the norms, this implies the overall convergence.
## Main results
* `q.comp p` is the formal composition of the formal multilinear series `q` and `p`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt.comp` states that if two functions `g` and `f` admit power series expansions
`q` and `p`, then `g ∘ f` admits a power series expansion given by `q.comp p`.
* `AnalyticAt.comp` states that the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
* `FormalMultilinearSeries.comp_assoc` states that composition is associative on formal
multilinear series.
## Implementation details
The main technical difficulty is to write down things. In particular, we need to define precisely
`q.compAlongComposition p c` and to show that it is indeed a continuous multilinear
function. This requires a whole interface built on the class `Composition`. Once this is set,
the main difficulty is to reorder the sums, writing the composition of the partial sums as a sum
over some subset of `Σ n, Composition n`. We need to check that the reordering is a bijection,
running over difficulties due to the dependent nature of the types under consideration, that are
controlled thanks to the interface for `Composition`.
The associativity of composition on formal multilinear series is a nontrivial result: it does not
follow from the associativity of composition of analytic functions, as there is no uniqueness for
the formal multilinear series representing a function (and also, it holds even when the radius of
convergence of the series is `0`). Instead, we give a direct proof, which amounts to reordering
double sums in a careful way. The change of variables is a canonical (combinatorial) bijection
`Composition.sigmaEquivSigmaPi` between `(Σ (a : Composition n), Composition a.length)` and
`(Σ (c : Composition n), Π (i : Fin c.length), Composition (c.blocksFun i))`, and is described
in more details below in the paragraph on associativity.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E F G H : Type*}
open Filter List
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal
section Topological
variable [CommRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [AddCommGroup G]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [Module 𝕜 G]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace G]
/-! ### Composing formal multilinear series -/
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 G]
/-!
In this paragraph, we define the composition of formal multilinear series, by summing over all
possible compositions of `n`.
-/
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and the index `i` of a
block of `c`, we may define a function on `Fin n → E` by picking the variables in the `i`-th block
of `n`, and applying the corresponding coefficient of `p` to these variables. This function is
called `p.applyComposition c v i` for `v : Fin n → E` and `i : Fin c.length`. -/
def applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n) :
(Fin n → E) → Fin c.length → F := fun v i => p (c.blocksFun i) (v ∘ c.embedding i)
theorem applyComposition_ones (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
p.applyComposition (Composition.ones n) = fun v i =>
p 1 fun _ => v (Fin.castLE (Composition.length_le _) i) := by
funext v i
apply p.congr (Composition.ones_blocksFun _ _)
intro j hjn hj1
obtain rfl : j = 0 := by omega
refine congr_arg v ?_
rw [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.coe_castLE, Composition.ones_embedding, Fin.val_mk]
theorem applyComposition_single (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(v : Fin n → E) : p.applyComposition (Composition.single n hn) v = fun _j => p n v := by
ext j
refine p.congr (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => ?_
dsimp
congr 1
convert Composition.single_embedding hn ⟨i, hi2⟩ using 1
obtain ⟨j_val, j_property⟩ := j
have : j_val = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 j_property)
congr!
simp
@[simp]
theorem removeZero_applyComposition (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ}
(c : Composition n) : p.removeZero.applyComposition c = p.applyComposition c := by
ext v i
simp [applyComposition, zero_lt_one.trans_le (c.one_le_blocksFun i), removeZero_of_pos]
/-- Technical lemma stating how `p.applyComposition` commutes with updating variables. This
will be the key point to show that functions constructed from `applyComposition` retain
multilinearity. -/
theorem applyComposition_update (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (c : Composition n)
(j : Fin n) (v : Fin n → E) (z : E) :
p.applyComposition c (Function.update v j z) =
Function.update (p.applyComposition c v) (c.index j)
(p (c.blocksFun (c.index j))
(Function.update (v ∘ c.embedding (c.index j)) (c.invEmbedding j) z)) := by
ext k
by_cases h : k = c.index j
· rw [h]
let r : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) → Fin n := c.embedding (c.index j)
simp only [Function.update_self]
change p (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = _
let j' := c.invEmbedding j
suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by rw [B]
suffices C : Function.update v (r j') z ∘ r = Function.update (v ∘ r) j' z by
convert C; exact (c.embedding_comp_inv j).symm
exact Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective _ (c.embedding _).injective _ _
· simp only [h, Function.update_eq_self, Function.update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let r : Fin (c.blocksFun k) → Fin n := c.embedding k
change p (c.blocksFun k) (Function.update v j z ∘ r) = p (c.blocksFun k) (v ∘ r)
suffices B : Function.update v j z ∘ r = v ∘ r by rw [B]
apply Function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range
rwa [c.mem_range_embedding_iff']
@[simp]
theorem compContinuousLinearMap_applyComposition {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(f : E →L[𝕜] F) (c : Composition n) (v : Fin n → E) :
(p.compContinuousLinearMap f).applyComposition c v = p.applyComposition c (f ∘ v) := by
simp (config := {unfoldPartialApp := true}) [applyComposition]; rfl
end FormalMultilinearSeries
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
open FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p`, a composition `c` of `n` and a continuous multilinear
map `f` in `c.length` variables, one may form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by
applying the right coefficient of `p` to each block of the composition, and then applying `f` to
the resulting vector. It is called `f.compAlongComposition p c`. -/
def compAlongComposition {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n)
(f : F [×c.length]→L[𝕜] G) : E [×n]→L[𝕜] G where
toMultilinearMap :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun v ↦ f (p.applyComposition c v))
(fun v i x y ↦ by simp only [applyComposition_update, map_update_add])
(fun v i c x ↦ by simp only [applyComposition_update, map_update_smul])
cont :=
f.cont.comp <|
continuous_pi fun _ => (coe_continuous _).comp <| continuous_pi fun _ => continuous_apply _
@[simp]
theorem compAlongComposition_apply {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n)
(f : F [×c.length]→L[𝕜] G) (v : Fin n → E) :
(f.compAlongComposition p c) v = f (p.applyComposition c v) :=
rfl
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 G]
/-- Given two formal multilinear series `q` and `p` and a composition `c` of `n`, one may
form a continuous multilinear map in `n` variables by applying the right coefficient of `p` to each
block of the composition, and then applying `q c.length` to the resulting vector. It is
called `q.compAlongComposition p c`. -/
def compAlongComposition {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) : (E [×n]→L[𝕜] G) :=
(q c.length).compAlongComposition p c
@[simp]
theorem compAlongComposition_apply {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) (v : Fin n → E) :
(q.compAlongComposition p c) v = q c.length (p.applyComposition c v) :=
rfl
/-- Formal composition of two formal multilinear series. The `n`-th coefficient in the composition
is defined to be the sum of `q.compAlongComposition p c` over all compositions of
`n`. In other words, this term (as a multilinear function applied to `v_0, ..., v_{n-1}`) is
`∑'_{k} ∑'_{i₁ + ... + iₖ = n} qₖ (p_{i_1} (...), ..., p_{i_k} (...))`, where one puts all variables
`v_0, ..., v_{n-1}` in increasing order in the dots.
In general, the composition `q ∘ p` only makes sense when the constant coefficient of `p` vanishes.
We give a general formula but which ignores the value of `p 0` instead.
-/
protected def comp (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E G := fun n => ∑ c : Composition n, q.compAlongComposition p c
/-- The `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` is `q 0`. Since these maps are multilinear maps in zero
variables, but on different spaces, we can not state this directly, so we state it when applied to
arbitrary vectors (which have to be the zero vector). -/
theorem comp_coeff_zero (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(v : Fin 0 → E) (v' : Fin 0 → F) : (q.comp p) 0 v = q 0 v' := by
let c : Composition 0 := Composition.ones 0
dsimp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
have : {c} = (Finset.univ : Finset (Composition 0)) := by
apply Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le <;> simp [Finset.card_univ, composition_card 0]
rw [← this, Finset.sum_singleton, compAlongComposition_apply]
symm; congr! -- Porting note: needed the stronger `congr!`!
@[simp]
theorem comp_coeff_zero' (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(v : Fin 0 → E) : (q.comp p) 0 v = q 0 fun _i => 0 :=
q.comp_coeff_zero p v _
/-- The `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` is `q 0`. When `p` goes from `E` to `E`, this can be
expressed as a direct equality -/
theorem comp_coeff_zero'' (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E E) :
(q.comp p) 0 = q 0 := by ext v; exact q.comp_coeff_zero p _ _
/-- The first coefficient of a composition of formal multilinear series is the composition of the
first coefficients seen as continuous linear maps. -/
theorem comp_coeff_one (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(v : Fin 1 → E) : (q.comp p) 1 v = q 1 fun _i => p 1 v := by
have : {Composition.ones 1} = (Finset.univ : Finset (Composition 1)) :=
Finset.eq_univ_of_card _ (by simp [composition_card])
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp, compAlongComposition_apply, ← this,
Finset.sum_singleton]
refine q.congr (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => ?_
simp only [applyComposition_ones]
exact p.congr rfl fun j _hj1 hj2 => by congr! -- Porting note: needed the stronger `congr!`
/-- Only `0`-th coefficient of `q.comp p` depends on `q 0`. -/
theorem removeZero_comp_of_pos (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
q.removeZero.comp p n = q.comp p n := by
ext v
simp only [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp, compAlongComposition,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compAlongComposition_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.sum_apply]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun c _hc => ?_
rw [removeZero_of_pos _ (c.length_pos_of_pos hn)]
@[simp]
theorem comp_removeZero (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
q.comp p.removeZero = q.comp p := by ext n; simp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
end FormalMultilinearSeries
end Topological
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [NormedAddCommGroup H]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
/-- The norm of `f.compAlongComposition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `f` and `p`. -/
theorem compAlongComposition_bound {n : ℕ} (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n)
(f : F [×c.length]→L[𝕜] G) (v : Fin n → E) :
‖f.compAlongComposition p c v‖ ≤ (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖) * ∏ i : Fin n, ‖v i‖ :=
calc
‖f.compAlongComposition p c v‖ = ‖f (p.applyComposition c v)‖ := rfl
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.applyComposition c v i‖ := ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖ * ∏ j : Fin (c.blocksFun i), ‖(v ∘ c.embedding i) j‖ := by
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (norm_nonneg _)
refine Finset.prod_le_prod (fun i _hi => norm_nonneg _) fun i _hi => ?_
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm
_ = (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖) *
∏ i, ∏ j : Fin (c.blocksFun i), ‖(v ∘ c.embedding i) j‖ := by
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖) * ∏ i : Fin n, ‖v i‖ := by
rw [← c.blocksFinEquiv.prod_comp, ← Finset.univ_sigma_univ, Finset.prod_sigma]
congr
/-- The norm of `q.compAlongComposition p c` is controlled by the product of
the norms of the relevant bits of `q` and `p`. -/
theorem compAlongComposition_norm {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) :
‖q.compAlongComposition p c‖ ≤ ‖q c.length‖ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖ :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) (compAlongComposition_bound _ _ _)
theorem compAlongComposition_nnnorm {n : ℕ} (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (c : Composition n) :
‖q.compAlongComposition p c‖₊ ≤ ‖q c.length‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊ := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe]; push_cast; exact q.compAlongComposition_norm p c
/-!
### The identity formal power series
We will now define the identity power series, and show that it is a neutral element for left and
right composition.
-/
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- The identity formal multilinear series, with all coefficients equal to `0` except for `n = 1`
where it is (the continuous multilinear version of) the identity. We allow an arbitrary
constant coefficient `x`. -/
def id (x : E) : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E E
| 0 => ContinuousMultilinearMap.uncurry0 𝕜 _ x
| 1 => (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E E).symm (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E)
| _ => 0
@[simp] theorem id_apply_zero (x : E) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
(FormalMultilinearSeries.id 𝕜 E x) 0 v = x := rfl
/-- The first coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_one (x : E) (v : Fin 1 → E) : (FormalMultilinearSeries.id 𝕜 E x) 1 v = v 0 :=
rfl
/-- The `n`th coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is the identity when `n = 1`. We state this in a dependent
way, as it will often appear in this form. -/
theorem id_apply_one' (x : E) {n : ℕ} (h : n = 1) (v : Fin n → E) :
(id 𝕜 E x) n v = v ⟨0, h.symm ▸ zero_lt_one⟩ := by
subst n
apply id_apply_one
/-- For `n ≠ 1`, the `n`-th coefficient of `id 𝕜 E` is zero, by definition. -/
@[simp]
theorem id_apply_of_one_lt (x : E) {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) :
(FormalMultilinearSeries.id 𝕜 E x) n = 0 := by
match n with
| 0 => contradiction
| 1 => contradiction
| n + 2 => rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : p.comp (id 𝕜 E x) = p := by
ext1 n
dsimp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (Composition.ones n)]
· show compAlongComposition p (id 𝕜 E x) (Composition.ones n) = p n
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply]
apply p.congr (Composition.ones_length n)
intros
rw [applyComposition_ones]
refine congr_arg v ?_
rw [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.coe_castLE, Fin.val_mk]
· show
∀ b : Composition n,
b ∈ Finset.univ → b ≠ Composition.ones n → compAlongComposition p (id 𝕜 E x) b = 0
intro b _ hb
obtain ⟨k, hk, lt_k⟩ : ∃ (k : ℕ), k ∈ Composition.blocks b ∧ 1 < k :=
Composition.ne_ones_iff.1 hb
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ (i : Fin b.blocks.length), b.blocks[i] = k :=
List.get_of_mem hk
let j : Fin b.length := ⟨i.val, b.blocks_length ▸ i.prop⟩
have A : 1 < b.blocksFun j := by convert lt_k
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero _ j
dsimp [applyComposition]
rw [id_apply_of_one_lt _ _ _ A, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
· simp
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (v0 : Fin 0 → E) :
(id 𝕜 F (p 0 v0)).comp p = p := by
ext1 n
obtain rfl | n_pos := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· ext v
simp only [comp_coeff_zero', id_apply_zero]
congr with i
exact i.elim0
· dsimp [FormalMultilinearSeries.comp]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (Composition.single n n_pos)]
· show compAlongComposition (id 𝕜 F (p 0 v0)) p (Composition.single n n_pos) = p n
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply, id_apply_one' _ _ _ (Composition.single_length n_pos)]
dsimp [applyComposition]
refine p.congr rfl fun i him hin => congr_arg v <| ?_
ext; simp
· show
∀ b : Composition n, b ∈ Finset.univ → b ≠ Composition.single n n_pos →
compAlongComposition (id 𝕜 F (p 0 v0)) p b = 0
intro b _ hb
have A : 1 < b.length := by
have : b.length ≠ 1 := by simpa [Composition.eq_single_iff_length] using hb
have : 0 < b.length := Composition.length_pos_of_pos b n_pos
omega
ext v
rw [compAlongComposition_apply, id_apply_of_one_lt _ _ _ A,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply]
· simp
/-- Variant of `id_comp` in which the zero coefficient is given by an equality hypothesis instead
of a definitional equality. Useful for rewriting or simplifying out in some situations. -/
theorem id_comp' (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : F) (v0 : Fin 0 → E) (h : x = p 0 v0) :
(id 𝕜 F x).comp p = p := by
simp [h]
/-! ### Summability properties of the composition of formal power series -/
section
/-- If two formal multilinear series have positive radius of convergence, then the terms appearing
in the definition of their composition are also summable (when multiplied by a suitable positive
geometric term). -/
theorem comp_summable_nnreal (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hq : 0 < q.radius) (hp : 0 < p.radius) :
∃ r > (0 : ℝ≥0),
Summable fun i : Σ n, Composition n => ‖q.compAlongComposition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1 := by
/- This follows from the fact that the growth rate of `‖qₙ‖` and `‖pₙ‖` is at most geometric,
giving a geometric bound on each `‖q.compAlongComposition p op‖`, together with the
fact that there are `2^(n-1)` compositions of `n`, giving at most a geometric loss. -/
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (lt_min zero_lt_one hq) with ⟨rq, rq_pos, hrq⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (lt_min zero_lt_one hp) with ⟨rp, rp_pos, hrp⟩
simp only [lt_min_iff, ENNReal.coe_lt_one_iff, ENNReal.coe_pos] at hrp hrq rp_pos rq_pos
obtain ⟨Cq, _hCq0, hCq⟩ : ∃ Cq > 0, ∀ n, ‖q n‖₊ * rq ^ n ≤ Cq :=
q.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius hrq.2
obtain ⟨Cp, hCp1, hCp⟩ : ∃ Cp ≥ 1, ∀ n, ‖p n‖₊ * rp ^ n ≤ Cp := by
rcases p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius hrp.2 with ⟨Cp, -, hCp⟩
exact ⟨max Cp 1, le_max_right _ _, fun n => (hCp n).trans (le_max_left _ _)⟩
let r0 : ℝ≥0 := (4 * Cp)⁻¹
have r0_pos : 0 < r0 := inv_pos.2 (mul_pos zero_lt_four (zero_lt_one.trans_le hCp1))
set r : ℝ≥0 := rp * rq * r0
have r_pos : 0 < r := mul_pos (mul_pos rp_pos rq_pos) r0_pos
have I :
∀ i : Σ n : ℕ, Composition n, ‖q.compAlongComposition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1 ≤ Cq / 4 ^ i.1 := by
rintro ⟨n, c⟩
have A := calc
‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ n ≤ ‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ c.length :=
mul_le_mul' le_rfl (pow_le_pow_of_le_one rq.2 hrq.1.le c.length_le)
_ ≤ Cq := hCq _
have B := calc
(∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊) * rp ^ n = ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊ * rp ^ c.blocksFun i := by
simp only [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum, c.sum_blocksFun]
_ ≤ ∏ _i : Fin c.length, Cp := Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i _ => hCp _
_ = Cp ^ c.length := by simp
_ ≤ Cp ^ n := pow_right_mono₀ hCp1 c.length_le
calc
‖q.compAlongComposition p c‖₊ * r ^ n ≤
(‖q c.length‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊) * r ^ n :=
mul_le_mul' (q.compAlongComposition_nnnorm p c) le_rfl
_ = ‖q c.length‖₊ * rq ^ n * ((∏ i, ‖p (c.blocksFun i)‖₊) * rp ^ n) * r0 ^ n := by
ring
_ ≤ Cq * Cp ^ n * r0 ^ n := mul_le_mul' (mul_le_mul' A B) le_rfl
_ = Cq / 4 ^ n := by
simp only [r0]
field_simp [mul_pow, (zero_lt_one.trans_le hCp1).ne']
ring
refine ⟨r, r_pos, NNReal.summable_of_le I ?_⟩
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine Summable.mul_left _ ?_
have : ∀ n : ℕ, HasSum (fun c : Composition n => (4 ^ n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) (2 ^ (n - 1) / 4 ^ n) := by
intro n
convert hasSum_fintype fun c : Composition n => (4 ^ n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹
simp [Finset.card_univ, composition_card, div_eq_mul_inv]
refine NNReal.summable_sigma.2 ⟨fun n => (this n).summable, (NNReal.summable_nat_add_iff 1).1 ?_⟩
convert (NNReal.summable_geometric (NNReal.div_lt_one_of_lt one_lt_two)).mul_left (1 / 4) using 1
ext1 n
rw [(this _).tsum_eq, add_tsub_cancel_right]
field_simp [← mul_assoc, pow_succ, mul_pow, show (4 : ℝ≥0) = 2 * 2 by norm_num,
mul_right_comm]
end
/-- Bounding below the radius of the composition of two formal multilinear series assuming
summability over all compositions. -/
theorem le_comp_radius_of_summable (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G)
(p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (r : ℝ≥0)
(hr : Summable fun i : Σ n, Composition n => ‖q.compAlongComposition p i.2‖₊ * r ^ i.1) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (q.comp p).radius := by
refine
le_radius_of_bound_nnreal _
(∑' i : Σ n, Composition n, ‖compAlongComposition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst) fun n => ?_
calc
‖FormalMultilinearSeries.comp q p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤
∑' c : Composition n, ‖compAlongComposition q p c‖₊ * r ^ n := by
rw [tsum_fintype, ← Finset.sum_mul]
exact mul_le_mul' (nnnorm_sum_le _ _) le_rfl
_ ≤ ∑' i : Σ n : ℕ, Composition n, ‖compAlongComposition q p i.snd‖₊ * r ^ i.fst :=
NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hr sigma_mk_injective
/-!
### Composing analytic functions
Now, we will prove that the composition of the partial sums of `q` and `p` up to order `N` is
given by a sum over some large subset of `Σ n, Composition n` of `q.compAlongComposition p`, to
deduce that the series for `q.comp p` indeed converges to `g ∘ f` when `q` is a power series for
`g` and `p` is a power series for `f`.
This proof is a big reindexing argument of a sum. Since it is a bit involved, we define first
the source of the change of variables (`compPartialSumSource`), its target
(`compPartialSumTarget`) and the change of variables itself (`compChangeOfVariables`) before
giving the main statement in `comp_partialSum`. -/
/-- Source set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series.
See also `comp_partialSum`. -/
def compPartialSumSource (m M N : ℕ) : Finset (Σ n, Fin n → ℕ) :=
Finset.sigma (Finset.Ico m M) (fun n : ℕ => Fintype.piFinset fun _i : Fin n => Finset.Ico 1 N :)
@[simp]
theorem mem_compPartialSumSource_iff (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ) :
i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N ↔
(m ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < M) ∧ ∀ a : Fin i.1, 1 ≤ i.2 a ∧ i.2 a < N := by
simp only [compPartialSumSource, Finset.mem_Ico, Fintype.mem_piFinset, Finset.mem_sigma]
/-- Change of variables appearing to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series -/
def compChangeOfVariables (m M N : ℕ) (i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ) (hi : i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N) :
Σ n, Composition n := by
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩
rw [mem_compPartialSumSource_iff] at hi
refine ⟨∑ j, f j, ofFn fun a => f a, fun {i} hi' => ?_, by simp [sum_ofFn]⟩
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ : ∃ j : Fin n, f j = i := by rwa [mem_ofFn', Set.mem_range] at hi'
exact (hi.2 j).1
@[simp]
theorem compChangeOfVariables_length (m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ}
(hi : i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N) :
Composition.length (compChangeOfVariables m M N i hi).2 = i.1 := by
rcases i with ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩
dsimp [compChangeOfVariables]
simp only [Composition.length, map_ofFn, length_ofFn]
theorem compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun (m M N : ℕ) {i : Σ n, Fin n → ℕ}
(hi : i ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N) (j : Fin i.1) :
(compChangeOfVariables m M N i hi).2.blocksFun
⟨j, (compChangeOfVariables_length m M N hi).symm ▸ j.2⟩ =
i.2 j := by
rcases i with ⟨n, f⟩
dsimp [Composition.blocksFun, Composition.blocks, compChangeOfVariables]
simp only [map_ofFn, List.getElem_ofFn, Function.comp_apply]
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a set. -/
def compPartialSumTargetSet (m M N : ℕ) : Set (Σ n, Composition n) :=
{i | m ≤ i.2.length ∧ i.2.length < M ∧ ∀ j : Fin i.2.length, i.2.blocksFun j < N}
theorem compPartialSumTargetSet_image_compPartialSumSource (m M N : ℕ)
(i : Σ n, Composition n) (hi : i ∈ compPartialSumTargetSet m M N) :
∃ (j : _) (hj : j ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N), compChangeOfVariables m M N j hj = i := by
rcases i with ⟨n, c⟩
refine ⟨⟨c.length, c.blocksFun⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [compPartialSumTargetSet, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hi
simp only [mem_compPartialSumSource_iff, hi.left, hi.right, true_and, and_true]
exact fun a => c.one_le_blocks' _
· dsimp [compChangeOfVariables]
rw [Composition.sigma_eq_iff_blocks_eq]
simp only [Composition.blocksFun, Composition.blocks, Subtype.coe_eta]
conv_rhs => rw [← List.ofFn_get c.blocks]
/-- Target set in the change of variables to compute the composition of partial sums of formal
power series, here given a a finset.
See also `comp_partialSum`. -/
def compPartialSumTarget (m M N : ℕ) : Finset (Σ n, Composition n) :=
Set.Finite.toFinset <|
((Finset.finite_toSet _).dependent_image _).subset <|
compPartialSumTargetSet_image_compPartialSumSource m M N
@[simp]
theorem mem_compPartialSumTarget_iff {m M N : ℕ} {a : Σ n, Composition n} :
a ∈ compPartialSumTarget m M N ↔
m ≤ a.2.length ∧ a.2.length < M ∧ ∀ j : Fin a.2.length, a.2.blocksFun j < N := by
simp [compPartialSumTarget, compPartialSumTargetSet]
/-- `compChangeOfVariables m M N` is a bijection between `compPartialSumSource m M N`
and `compPartialSumTarget m M N`, yielding equal sums for functions that correspond to each
other under the bijection. As `compChangeOfVariables m M N` is a dependent function, stating
that it is a bijection is not directly possible, but the consequence on sums can be stated
more easily. -/
theorem compChangeOfVariables_sum {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] (m M N : ℕ)
(f : (Σ n : ℕ, Fin n → ℕ) → α) (g : (Σ n, Composition n) → α)
(h : ∀ (e) (he : e ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N), f e = g (compChangeOfVariables m M N e he)) :
∑ e ∈ compPartialSumSource m M N, f e = ∑ e ∈ compPartialSumTarget m M N, g e := by
apply Finset.sum_bij (compChangeOfVariables m M N)
-- We should show that the correspondence we have set up is indeed a bijection
-- between the index sets of the two sums.
-- 1 - show that the image belongs to `compPartialSumTarget m N N`
· rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H
rw [mem_compPartialSumSource_iff] at H
simp only [mem_compPartialSumTarget_iff, Composition.length, Composition.blocks, H.left,
map_ofFn, length_ofFn, true_and, compChangeOfVariables]
intro j
simp only [Composition.blocksFun, (H.right _).right, List.get_ofFn]
-- 2 - show that the map is injective
· rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H ⟨k', blocks_fun'⟩ H' heq
obtain rfl : k = k' := by
have := (compChangeOfVariables_length m M N H).symm
rwa [heq, compChangeOfVariables_length] at this
congr
funext i
calc
blocks_fun i = (compChangeOfVariables m M N _ H).2.blocksFun _ :=
(compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun m M N H i).symm
_ = (compChangeOfVariables m M N _ H').2.blocksFun _ := by
apply Composition.blocksFun_congr <;>
first | rw [heq] | rfl
_ = blocks_fun' i := compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun m M N H' i
-- 3 - show that the map is surjective
· intro i hi
apply compPartialSumTargetSet_image_compPartialSumSource m M N i
simpa [compPartialSumTarget] using hi
-- 4 - show that the composition gives the `compAlongComposition` application
· rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H
rw [h]
/-- The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains
all possible compositions. -/
theorem compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_prod_atTop :
Tendsto (fun (p : ℕ × ℕ) => compPartialSumTarget 0 p.1 p.2) atTop atTop := by
apply Monotone.tendsto_atTop_finset
· intro m n hmn a ha
have : ∀ i, i < m.1 → i < n.1 := fun i hi => lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn.1
have : ∀ i, i < m.2 → i < n.2 := fun i hi => lt_of_lt_of_le hi hmn.2
aesop
· rintro ⟨n, c⟩
simp only [mem_compPartialSumTarget_iff]
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : BddAbove ((Finset.univ.image fun i : Fin c.length => c.blocksFun i) : Set ℕ) :=
Finset.bddAbove _
refine
⟨max n c.length + 1, bot_le, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right n c.length) (lt_add_one _), fun j =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans ?_ (le_max_left _ _)) (lt_add_one _)⟩
apply hn
simp only [Finset.mem_image_of_mem, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_univ]
/-- The auxiliary set corresponding to the composition of partial sums asymptotically contains
all possible compositions. -/
theorem compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_atTop :
Tendsto (fun N => compPartialSumTarget 0 N N) atTop atTop := by
apply Tendsto.comp compPartialSumTarget_tendsto_prod_atTop tendsto_atTop_diagonal
/-- Composing the partial sums of two multilinear series coincides with the sum over all
compositions in `compPartialSumTarget 0 N N`. This is precisely the motivation for the
definition of `compPartialSumTarget`. -/
theorem comp_partialSum (q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(M N : ℕ) (z : E) :
q.partialSum M (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico 1 N, p i fun _j => z) =
∑ i ∈ compPartialSumTarget 0 M N, q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => z := by
-- we expand the composition, using the multilinearity of `q` to expand along each coordinate.
suffices H :
(∑ n ∈ Finset.range M,
∑ r ∈ Fintype.piFinset fun i : Fin n => Finset.Ico 1 N,
q n fun i : Fin n => p (r i) fun _j => z) =
∑ i ∈ compPartialSumTarget 0 M N, q.compAlongComposition p i.2 fun _j => z by
simpa only [FormalMultilinearSeries.partialSum, ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_sum_finset] using H
-- rewrite the first sum as a big sum over a sigma type, in the finset
-- `compPartialSumTarget 0 N N`
rw [Finset.range_eq_Ico, Finset.sum_sigma']
-- use `compChangeOfVariables_sum`, saying that this change of variables respects sums
apply compChangeOfVariables_sum 0 M N
rintro ⟨k, blocks_fun⟩ H
apply congr _ (compChangeOfVariables_length 0 M N H).symm
intros
rw [← compChangeOfVariables_blocksFun 0 M N H, applyComposition, Function.comp_def]
end FormalMultilinearSeries
open FormalMultilinearSeries
/-- If two functions `g` and `f` have power series `q` and `p` respectively at `f x` and `x`, within
two sets `s` and `t` such that `f` maps `s` to `t`, then `g ∘ f` admits the power
series `q.comp p` at `x` within `s`. -/
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 F G}
{p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {t : Set F} {s : Set E}
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt g q t (f x)) (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x)
(hs : Set.MapsTo f s t) : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (g ∘ f) (q.comp p) s x := by
| /- Consider `rf` and `rg` such that `f` and `g` have power series expansion on the disks
of radius `rf` and `rg`. -/
rcases hg with ⟨rg, Hg⟩
rcases hf with ⟨rf, Hf⟩
-- The terms defining `q.comp p` are geometrically summable in a disk of some radius `r`.
rcases q.comp_summable_nnreal p Hg.radius_pos Hf.radius_pos with ⟨r, r_pos : 0 < r, hr⟩
/- We will consider `y` which is smaller than `r` and `rf`, and also small enough that
`f (x + y)` is close enough to `f x` to be in the disk where `g` is well behaved. Let
`min (r, rf, δ)` be this new radius. -/
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ :
∃ δ : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < δ ∧ ∀ {z : E}, z ∈ insert x s ∩ EMetric.ball x δ
→ f z ∈ insert (f x) t ∩ EMetric.ball (f x) rg := by
have : insert (f x) t ∩ EMetric.ball (f x) rg ∈ 𝓝[insert (f x) t] (f x) := by
apply inter_mem_nhdsWithin
exact EMetric.ball_mem_nhds _ Hg.r_pos
have := Hf.analyticWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_insert.tendsto_nhdsWithin (hs.insert x) this
rcases EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 this with ⟨δ, δpos, Hδ⟩
exact ⟨δ, δpos, fun {z} hz => Hδ (by rwa [Set.inter_comm])⟩
let rf' := min rf δ
have min_pos : 0 < min rf' r := by
simp only [rf', r_pos, Hf.r_pos, δpos, lt_min_iff, ENNReal.coe_pos, and_self_iff]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Composition.lean | 698 | 718 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on finsets
## Main definitions
- `Finset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
- `Finset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
## Implementation notes
Many of the proofs use the lemmas `gcd_def` and `lcm_def`, which relate `Finset.gcd`
and `Finset.lcm` to `Multiset.gcd` and `Multiset.lcm`.
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `Data.Finset.Lattice`
## Tags
finset, gcd
-/
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a finite set -/
def lcm (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.lcm 1 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_empty : (∅ : Finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
@[simp]
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.lcm_dvd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2
theorem dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
@[simp]
theorem lcm_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (f b) (s.lcm f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(lcm_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.lcm f) (Multiset.normalize_lcm (s.1.map f))).2 (dvd_lcm h)]
apply fold_insert h
@[simp]
theorem lcm_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).lcm f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.lcm_singleton
@[local simp] -- This will later be provable by other `simp` lemmas.
theorem normalize_lcm : normalize (s.lcm f) = s.lcm f := by simp [lcm_def]
theorem lcm_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (s₁.lcm f) (s₂.lcm f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, lcm_empty, lcm_one_left, normalize_lcm])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, lcm_insert, lcm_insert, ih, lcm_assoc]
theorem lcm_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.lcm f = s₂.lcm g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
theorem lcm_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.lcm f ∣ s.lcm g :=
lcm_dvd fun b hb ↦ (h b hb).trans (dvd_lcm hb)
theorem lcm_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.lcm f ∣ s₂.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd fun _ hb ↦ dvd_lcm (h hb)
theorem lcm_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).lcm f = s.lcm (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction s using Finset.induction <;> simp [*]
theorem lcm_eq_lcm_image [DecidableEq α] : s.lcm f = (s.image f).lcm id :=
Eq.symm <| lcm_image _
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial α] : s.lcm f = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ f '' s := by
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, lcm_def, Multiset.lcm_eq_zero_iff, Set.mem_image, mem_coe, ←
Finset.mem_def]
end lcm
/-! ### gcd -/
section gcd
/-- Greatest common divisor of a finite set -/
def gcd (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.gcd 0 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem gcd_def : s.gcd f = (s.1.map f).gcd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem gcd_empty : (∅ : Finset β).gcd f = 0 :=
fold_empty
theorem dvd_gcd_iff {a : α} : a ∣ s.gcd f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.dvd_gcd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem gcd_dvd {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.gcd f ∣ f b :=
dvd_gcd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
theorem dvd_gcd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b) → a ∣ s.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd_iff.2
@[simp]
theorem gcd_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (f b) (s.gcd f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(gcd_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.gcd f) (Multiset.normalize_gcd (s.1.map f))).2 (gcd_dvd h)]
apply fold_insert h
@[simp]
theorem gcd_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).gcd f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.gcd_singleton
@[local simp] -- This will later be provable by other `simp` lemmas.
theorem normalize_gcd : normalize (s.gcd f) = s.gcd f := by simp [gcd_def]
theorem gcd_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (s₁.gcd f) (s₂.gcd f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, gcd_empty, gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, gcd_insert, gcd_insert, ih, gcd_assoc]
theorem gcd_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.gcd f = s₂.gcd g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
theorem gcd_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.gcd f ∣ s.gcd g :=
dvd_gcd fun b hb ↦ (gcd_dvd hb).trans (h b hb)
theorem gcd_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.gcd f ∣ s₁.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd fun _ hb ↦ gcd_dvd (h hb)
theorem gcd_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).gcd f = s.gcd (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction s using Finset.induction <;> simp [*]
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_image [DecidableEq α] : s.gcd f = (s.image f).gcd id :=
Eq.symm <| gcd_image _
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff : s.gcd f = 0 ↔ ∀ x : β, x ∈ s → f x = 0 := by
rw [gcd_def, Multiset.gcd_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· intro b bs
apply h (f b)
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, mem_def.1 bs]
use b
simp only [mem_def.1 bs, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
· intro a as
rw [Multiset.mem_map] at as
rcases as with ⟨b, ⟨bs, rfl⟩⟩
apply h b (mem_def.1 bs)
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_filter_ne_zero [DecidablePred fun x : β ↦ f x = 0] :
s.gcd f = {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0}.gcd f := by
classical
trans ({x ∈ s | f x = 0} ∪ {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0}).gcd f
· rw [filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
rw [gcd_union]
refine Eq.trans (?_ : _ = GCDMonoid.gcd (0 : α) ?_) (?_ : GCDMonoid.gcd (0 : α) _ = _)
· exact gcd {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0} f
· refine congr (congr rfl <| s.induction_on ?_ ?_) (by simp)
· simp
· intro a s _ h
rw [filter_insert]
split_ifs with h1 <;> simp [h, h1]
simp only [gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd]
nonrec theorem gcd_mul_left {a : α} : (s.gcd fun x ↦ a * f x) = normalize a * s.gcd f := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro b t _ h
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, h, ← gcd_mul_left]
apply ((normalize_associated a).mul_right _).gcd_eq_right
nonrec theorem gcd_mul_right {a : α} : (s.gcd fun x ↦ f x * a) = s.gcd f * normalize a := by
classical
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro b t _ h
rw [gcd_insert, gcd_insert, h, ← gcd_mul_right]
apply ((normalize_associated a).mul_left _).gcd_eq_right
theorem extract_gcd' (f g : β → α) (hs : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ f x ≠ 0)
(hg : ∀ b ∈ s, f b = s.gcd f * g b) : s.gcd g = 1 :=
((@mul_right_eq_self₀ _ _ (s.gcd f) _).1 <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← normalize_gcd, ← gcd_mul_left, ← gcd_congr rfl hg]).resolve_right <| by
contrapose! hs
exact gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 hs
theorem extract_gcd (f : β → α) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ g : β → α, (∀ b ∈ s, f b = s.gcd f * g b) ∧ s.gcd g = 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = (0 : α)
· refine ⟨fun _ ↦ 1, fun b hb ↦ by rw [h b hb, gcd_eq_zero_iff.2 h, mul_one], ?_⟩
rw [gcd_eq_gcd_image, image_const hs, gcd_singleton, id, normalize_one]
· choose g' hg using @gcd_dvd _ _ _ _ s f
push_neg at h
refine ⟨fun b ↦ if hb : b ∈ s then g' hb else 0, fun b hb ↦ ?_,
extract_gcd' f _ h fun b hb ↦ ?_⟩
· simp only [hb, hg, dite_true]
rw [dif_pos hb, hg hb]
variable [Div α] [MulDivCancelClass α] {f : ι → α} {s : Finset ι} {i : ι}
/-- Given a nonempty Finset `s` and a function `f` from `s` to `ℕ`, if `d = s.gcd`,
then the `gcd` of `(f i) / d` is equal to `1`. -/
| lemma gcd_div_eq_one (his : i ∈ s) (hfi : f i ≠ 0) : s.gcd (fun j ↦ f j / s.gcd f) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨g, he, hg⟩ := Finset.extract_gcd f ⟨i, his⟩
refine (Finset.gcd_congr rfl fun a ha ↦ ?_).trans hg
rw [he a ha, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
exact mt Finset.gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h ↦ hfi <| h i his
lemma gcd_div_id_eq_one {s : Finset α} {a : α} (has : a ∈ s) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Finset.lean | 244 | 250 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.Basic
/-!
# Legendre symbol
This file contains results about Legendre symbols.
We define the Legendre symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$ as `legendreSym p a`.
Note the order of arguments! The advantage of this form is that then `legendreSym p`
is a multiplicative map.
The Legendre symbol is used to define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a`
and (odd) natural numbers `b`, which extends the Legendre symbol.
## Main results
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `-1`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendreSym.at_neg_one` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff` for `-1`.
See `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity` for the conditions when `2` and `-2`
are squares:
`legendreSym.at_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2`,
`legendreSym.at_neg_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol
-/
open Nat
section Euler
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- Euler's Criterion: A unit `x` of `ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion_units (x : (ZMod p)ˣ) : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ x ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
by_cases hc : p = 2
· subst hc
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
· have h₀ := FiniteField.unit_isSquare_iff (by rwa [ringChar_zmod_n]) x
have hs : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ IsSquare x := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq x]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
rw [hs]
rwa [card p] at h₀
/-- Euler's Criterion: a nonzero `a : ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion {a : ZMod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) : IsSquare (a : ZMod p) ↔ a ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
apply (iff_congr _ (by simp [Units.ext_iff])).mp (euler_criterion_units p (Units.mk0 a ha))
simp only [Units.ext_iff, sq, Units.val_mk0, Units.val_mul]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩; exact ⟨y, hy.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [zero_pow, mul_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at ha
refine ⟨Units.mk0 y hy, ?_⟩; simp
/-- If `a : ZMod p` is nonzero, then `a^(p/2)` is either `1` or `-1`. -/
theorem pow_div_two_eq_neg_one_or_one {a : ZMod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a ^ (p / 2) = 1 ∨ a ^ (p / 2) = -1 := by
rcases Prime.eq_two_or_odd (@Fact.out p.Prime _) with hp2 | hp_odd
· subst p; revert a ha; intro a; fin_cases a
· tauto
· simp
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← pow_add, ← two_mul, two_mul_odd_div_two hp_odd]
exact pow_card_sub_one_eq_one ha
end ZMod
end Euler
section Legendre
/-!
### Definition of the Legendre symbol and basic properties
-/
open ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a : ℤ` and a prime `p`, `legendreSym p a`,
is an integer defined as
* `0` if `a` is `0` modulo `p`;
* `1` if `a` is a nonzero square modulo `p`
* `-1` otherwise.
Note the order of the arguments! The advantage of the order chosen here is
that `legendreSym p` is a multiplicative function `ℤ → ℤ`.
-/
def legendreSym (a : ℤ) : ℤ :=
quadraticChar (ZMod p) a
namespace legendreSym
/-- We have the congruence `legendreSym p a ≡ a ^ (p / 2) mod p`. -/
theorem eq_pow (a : ℤ) : (legendreSym p a : ZMod p) = (a : ZMod p) ^ (p / 2) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (ringChar (ZMod p)) 2 with hc | hc
· by_cases ha : (a : ZMod p) = 0
· rw [legendreSym, ha, quadraticChar_zero,
zero_pow (Nat.div_pos (@Fact.out p.Prime).two_le (succ_pos 1)).ne']
norm_cast
· have := (ringChar_zmod_n p).symm.trans hc
-- p = 2
subst p
rw [legendreSym, quadraticChar_eq_one_of_char_two hc ha]
revert ha
push_cast
generalize (a : ZMod 2) = b; fin_cases b
· tauto
· simp
· convert quadraticChar_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two' hc (a : ZMod p)
exact (card p).symm
/-- If `p ∤ a`, then `legendreSym p a` is `1` or `-1`. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ∨ legendreSym p a = -1 :=
quadraticChar_dichotomy ha
theorem eq_neg_one_iff_not_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬legendreSym p a = 1 :=
quadraticChar_eq_neg_one_iff_not_one ha
/-- The Legendre symbol of `p` and `a` is zero iff `p ∣ a`. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = 0 ↔ (a : ZMod p) = 0 :=
quadraticChar_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem at_zero : legendreSym p 0 = 0 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_zero, MulChar.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem at_one : legendreSym p 1 = 1 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_one, MulChar.map_one]
/-- The Legendre symbol is multiplicative in `a` for `p` fixed. -/
protected theorem mul (a b : ℤ) : legendreSym p (a * b) = legendreSym p a * legendreSym p b := by
simp [legendreSym, Int.cast_mul, map_mul, quadraticCharFun_mul]
/-- The Legendre symbol is a homomorphism of monoids with zero. -/
| @[simps]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/Basic.lean | 152 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
/-!
# Preadditive monoidal categories
A monoidal category is `MonoidalPreadditive` if it is preadditive and tensor product of morphisms
is linear in both factors.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- A category is `MonoidalPreadditive` if tensoring is additive in both factors.
Note we don't `extend Preadditive C` here, as `Abelian C` already extends it,
and we'll need to have both typeclasses sometimes.
-/
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
namespace MonoidalPreadditive
-- The priority setting will not be needed when we replace `𝟙 X ⊗ f` by `X ◁ f`.
@[simp (low)]
theorem tensor_zero {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) : f ⊗ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
-- The priority setting will not be needed when we replace `f ⊗ 𝟙 X` by `f ▷ X`.
@[simp (low)]
theorem zero_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) : (0 : W ⟶ X) ⊗ f = 0 := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
theorem tensor_add {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ⊗ (g + h) = f ⊗ g + f ⊗ h := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
theorem add_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f g : W ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : (f + g) ⊗ h = f ⊗ h + g ⊗ h := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
end MonoidalPreadditive
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
/-- A faithful additive monoidal functor to a monoidal preadditive category
ensures that the domain is monoidal preadditive. -/
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : D ⥤ C) [F.Monoidal] [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp only [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add,
Preadditive.add_comp, MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.map_injective
simp only [Functor.Monoidal.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add,
Preadditive.add_comp, MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem tensor_sum {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(f ⊗ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ⊗ g j := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, whiskerLeft_sum, Preadditive.comp_sum]
theorem sum_tensor {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ⊗ f = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ⊗ f := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, sum_whiskerRight, Preadditive.sum_comp]
-- In a closed monoidal category, this would hold because
-- `tensorLeft X` is a left adjoint and hence preserves all colimits.
| -- In any case it is true in any preadditive category.
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorLeft X) where
preserves {J} :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 113 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open CharZero Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← exp_conj, map_ofNat, div_neg,
neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div, -neg_add_rev, ← neg_add]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
Hurwitz zeta function). See `oddKernel_def` for the defining formula, and `hasSum_int_oddKernel`
for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`.
-/
@[irreducible] def oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun a : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x))) 1 by
intro a; simp [jacobiTheta₂''_add_left]).lift a
lemma oddKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel a x) = jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x) := by
simp [oddKernel, ← conj_eq_iff_re, jacobiTheta₂''_conj]
lemma oddKernel_def' (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) *
(jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (I * x) / (2 * π * I) + a * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x)) := by
rw [oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'', ← mul_assoc ↑a I x,
(by ring : ↑π * I * ↑a ^ 2 * (I * ↑x) = I ^ 2 * ↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * x), I_sq, neg_one_mul]
lemma oddKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : oddKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, oddKernel_def', jacobiTheta₂_undef, jacobiTheta₂'_undef, zero_div, zero_add,
mul_zero, mul_zero] <;>
simpa
/-- Auxiliary function appearing in the functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta kernel, equal
to `∑ (n : ℕ), 2 * n * sin (2 * π * n * a) * exp (-π * n ^ 2 * x)`. See `hasSum_nat_sinKernel`
for the defining sum. -/
@[irreducible] def sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂' ξ (I * x) / (-2 * π))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂'_add_left]).lift a
lemma sinKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(sinKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂' a (I * x) / (-2 * π) := by
simp [sinKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂'_conj, map_ofNat]
lemma sinKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : sinKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simpa), zero_div]
lemma oddKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : oddKernel (-a) x = -oddKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left]
@[simp] lemma oddKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : oddKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using oddKernel_neg 0 x
lemma sinKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
sinKernel (-a) x = -sinKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left,
neg_div]
@[simp] lemma sinKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : sinKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using sinKernel_neg 0 x
/-- The odd kernel is continuous on `Ioi 0`. -/
lemma continuousOn_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (oddKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (oddKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [oddKernel_def' a]
refine fun x hx ↦ ((Continuous.continuousAt ?_).mul ?_).continuousWithinAt
· fun_prop
· have hf : Continuous fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u) := by fun_prop
apply ContinuousAt.add
· exact ((continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt).div_const _
· exact continuousAt_const.mul <| (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x)
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt
lemma continuousOn_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (sinKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (sinKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [sinKernel_def]
apply (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)).div_const
have h := continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' a (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
fun_prop
lemma oddKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
oddKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (3 / 2 : ℝ) * sinKernel a (1 / x) := by
-- first reduce to `0 < x`
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [oddKernel_undef _ hx, sinKernel_undef _ (one_div_nonpos.mpr hx), mul_zero]
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
have h1 : -1 / (I * ↑(1 / x)) = I * x := by rw [one_div, ofReal_inv, mul_comm, ← div_div,
div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg, neg_one_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm]
have h2 : (-I * (I * ↑(1 / x))) = 1 / x := by
rw [← mul_assoc, neg_mul, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
have h3 : (x : ℂ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, hx.ne', false_and, not_false_eq_true]
have h4 : arg x ≠ π := by rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le]; exact pi_ne_zero.symm
rw [← ofReal_inj, oddKernel_def, ofReal_mul, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation',
h1, h2]
generalize jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * ↑x) = J
rw [one_div (x : ℂ), inv_cpow _ _ h4, div_inv_eq_mul, one_div, ofReal_inv, ofReal_cpow hx.le,
ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_ofNat, ← mul_div_assoc _ _ (-2 * π : ℂ),
eq_div_iff <| mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero),
← div_eq_inv_mul, eq_div_iff h3, mul_comm J _, mul_right_comm]
end kernel_defs
section sum_formulas
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_oddKernel (a : ℝ) {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ (n + a) * rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * x)) (oddKernel ↑a x) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, oddKernel_def' a x]
have h1 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
have h2 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
refine (((h2.div_const (2 * π * I)).add (h1.mul_left ↑a)).mul_left
(cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x))).congr_fun (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, mul_assoc (2 * π * I), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← add_mul,
mul_left_comm, jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
push_cast
simp only [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul]
congrm _ * cexp (?_ * x)
simp only [mul_right_comm _ I, add_mul, mul_assoc _ I, I_mul_I]
ring_nf
lemma hasSum_int_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum
(fun n : ℤ ↦ -I * n * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(sinKernel a t) := by
have h : -2 * (π : ℂ) ≠ (0 : ℂ) := by
simp only [neg_mul, ne_eq, neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, ofReal_eq_zero, pi_ne_zero, or_self, not_false_eq_true]
rw [sinKernel_def]
refine ((hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term a
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).div_const _).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, jacobiTheta₂_term, ofReal_exp, mul_assoc (-I * n), ← Complex.exp_add,
eq_div_iff h, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg, ofReal_intCast,
mul_comm _ (-2 * π : ℂ), ← mul_assoc]
congrm ?_ * cexp (?_ + ?_)
· simp [mul_assoc]
· exact mul_right_comm (2 * π * I) a n
· simp [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I]
lemma hasSum_nat_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * n * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(sinKernel ↑a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal]
have := (hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
simp only [Int.cast_zero, sq (0 : ℂ), zero_mul, mul_zero, add_zero] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Int.cast_neg, neg_sq, mul_neg, ofReal_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ofReal_natCast,
ofReal_ofNat, ← add_mul, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
push_cast
congr 1
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_self two_ne_zero, one_mul,
neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm _ I, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I, neg_mul,
← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_sub]
congr 3 <;> ring
end sum_formulas
section asymp
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `oddKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (oddKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H b =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_one b
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simpa [← (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int,
HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int, abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le] using
norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).summable.norm
/-- The function `sinKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (sinKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_one (le_refl 0)
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat, ← (hasSum_nat_sinKernel a ht).tsum_eq]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded (g := fun n ↦ 2 * HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat 1 0 t n)
· exact (HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 1 0 ht).hasSum.mul_left _
· intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_one, add_zero,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, Real.norm_eq_abs, Nat.abs_cast, ← mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (Nat.cast_nonneg _) (abs_sin_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of an FE-pair
-/
/-- A `StrongFEPair` structure with `f = oddKernel a` and `g = sinKernel a`. -/
@[simps]
def hurwitzOddFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : StrongFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal ∘ oddKernel a
g := ofReal ∘ sinKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_oddKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_sinKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
k := 3 / 2
hk := by norm_num
ε := 1
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := 0
hf₀ := rfl
g₀ := 0
hg₀ := rfl
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_oddKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simpa using hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
hg_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_sinKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simpa using hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by simp [← ofReal_mul, oddKernel_functional_equation a, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx)]
end FEPair
/-!
## Definition of the completed odd Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
` Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedSinZeta a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, StrongFEPair.Λ, hurwitzOddFEPair, mellin, oddKernel_neg,
integral_neg, neg_div]
lemma completedSinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta (-a) s = -completedSinZeta a s := by
simp [completedSinZeta, StrongFEPair.Λ, mellin, StrongFEPair.symm, WeakFEPair.symm,
hurwitzOddFEPair, sinKernel_neg, integral_neg, neg_div]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function. -/
theorem completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, completedSinZeta,
(by { push_cast; ring } : (1 - s + 1) / 2 = ↑(3 / 2 : ℝ) - (s + 1) / 2),
| ← hurwitzOddFEPair_k, (hurwitzOddFEPair a).functional_equation ((s + 1) / 2),
hurwitzOddFEPair_ε, one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedSinZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 372 | 376 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
/-!
# Homological complexes supported in a single degree
We define `single V j c : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c`,
which constructs complexes in `V` of shape `c`, supported in degree `j`.
In `ChainComplex.toSingle₀Equiv` we characterize chain maps to an
`ℕ`-indexed complex concentrated in degree 0; they are equivalent to
`{ f : C.X 0 ⟶ X // C.d 1 0 ≫ f = 0 }`.
(This is useful translating between a projective resolution and
an augmented exact complex of projectives.)
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits ZeroObject
universe v u
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V] [HasZeroObject V]
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c` creating a chain complex supported in a single degree.
-/
noncomputable def single (j : ι) : V ⥤ HomologicalComplex V c where
obj A :=
{ X := fun i => if i = j then A else 0
d := fun _ _ => 0 }
map f :=
{ f := fun i => if h : i = j then eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) ≫ f ≫
eqToHom (by dsimp; rw [if_pos h]) else 0 }
map_id A := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· #adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-07
the previous sensible proof `rw [if_neg h]; simp` fails with "motive not type correct".
The following is horrible. -/
convert (id_zero (C := V)).symm
all_goals simp [if_neg h]
map_comp f g := by
ext
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
variable {V}
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_X_self (j : ι) (A : V) :
((single V c j).obj A).X j = A := if_pos rfl
lemma isZero_single_obj_X (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
IsZero (((single V c j).obj A).X i) := by
dsimp [single]
rw [if_neg hi]
exact Limits.isZero_zero V
/-- The object in degree `i` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A` when `i = j`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXIsoOfEq (j : ι) (A : V) (i : ι) (hi : i = j) :
((single V c j).obj A).X i ≅ A :=
eqToIso (by subst hi; simp [single])
/-- The object in degree `j` of `(single V c h).obj A` is just `A`. -/
noncomputable def singleObjXSelf (j : ι) (A : V) : ((single V c j).obj A).X j ≅ A :=
singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A j rfl
@[simp]
lemma single_obj_d (j : ι) (A : V) (k l : ι) :
((single V c j).obj A).d k l = 0 := rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem single_map_f_self (j : ι) {A B : V} (f : A ⟶ B) :
((single V c j).map f).f j = (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom ≫
f ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv := by
dsimp [single]
rw [dif_pos rfl]
rfl
variable (V)
/-- The natural isomorphism `single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def singleCompEvalIsoSelf (j : ι) : single V c j ⋙ eval V c j ≅ 𝟭 V :=
NatIso.ofComponents (singleObjXSelf c j) (fun {A B} f => by simp [single_map_f_self])
lemma isZero_single_comp_eval (j i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) : IsZero (single V c j ⋙ eval V c i) :=
Functor.isZero _ (fun _ ↦ isZero_single_obj_X c _ _ _ hi)
variable {V c}
@[ext]
lemma from_single_hom_ext {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V}
{f g : (single V c j).obj A ⟶ K} (hfg : f.f j = g.f j) : f = g := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
exact hfg
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i h).eq_of_src
@[ext]
lemma to_single_hom_ext {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V}
{f g : K ⟶ (single V c j).obj A} (hfg : f.f j = g.f j) : f = g := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· subst h
exact hfg
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i h).eq_of_tgt
instance (j : ι) : (single V c j).Faithful where
map_injective {A B f g} w := by
rw [← cancel_mono (singleObjXSelf c j B).inv,
← cancel_epi (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom, ← single_map_f_self,
← single_map_f_self, w]
instance (j : ι) : (single V c j).Full where
map_surjective {A B} f :=
⟨(singleObjXSelf c j A).inv ≫ f.f j ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j B).hom, by
ext
simp [single_map_f_self]⟩
/-- Constructor for morphisms to a single homological complex. -/
noncomputable def mkHomToSingle {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : K.X j ⟶ A)
(hφ : ∀ (i : ι), c.Rel i j → K.d i j ≫ φ = 0) :
K ⟶ (single V c j).obj A where
f i :=
if hi : i = j
then (K.XIsoOfEq hi).hom ≫ φ ≫ (singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A i hi).inv
else 0
comm' i k hik := by
dsimp
rw [comp_zero]
split_ifs with hk
· subst hk
simp only [XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, id_comp, reassoc_of% hφ i hik, zero_comp]
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A k hk).eq_of_tgt
@[simp]
lemma mkHomToSingle_f {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : K.X j ⟶ A)
(hφ : ∀ (i : ι), c.Rel i j → K.d i j ≫ φ = 0) :
(mkHomToSingle φ hφ).f j = φ ≫ (singleObjXSelf c j A).inv := by
dsimp [mkHomToSingle]
rw [dif_pos rfl, id_comp]
rfl
/-- Constructor for morphisms from a single homological complex. -/
noncomputable def mkHomFromSingle {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : A ⟶ K.X j)
(hφ : ∀ (k : ι), c.Rel j k → φ ≫ K.d j k = 0) :
(single V c j).obj A ⟶ K where
f i :=
if hi : i = j
then (singleObjXIsoOfEq c j A i hi).hom ≫ φ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq hi).inv
else 0
comm' i k hik := by
dsimp
rw [zero_comp]
split_ifs with hi
· subst hi
simp only [XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, assoc, hφ k hik, comp_zero]
· apply (isZero_single_obj_X c j A i hi).eq_of_src
@[simp]
lemma mkHomFromSingle_f {K : HomologicalComplex V c} {j : ι} {A : V} (φ : A ⟶ K.X j)
(hφ : ∀ (k : ι), c.Rel j k → φ ≫ K.d j k = 0) :
(mkHomFromSingle φ hφ).f j = (singleObjXSelf c j A).hom ≫ φ := by
dsimp [mkHomFromSingle]
rw [dif_pos rfl, comp_id]
| rfl
instance (j : ι) : (single V c j).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Single.lean | 181 | 187 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bundle
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Trivializations
## Main definitions
### Basic definitions
* `Trivialization F p` : structure extending partial homeomorphisms, defining a local
trivialization of a topological space `Z` with projection `p` and fiber `F`.
* `Pretrivialization F proj` : trivialization as a partial equivalence, mainly used when the
topology on the total space has not yet been defined.
### Operations on bundles
We provide the following operations on `Trivialization`s.
* `Trivialization.compHomeomorph`: given a local trivialization `e` of a fiber bundle
`p : Z → B` and a homeomorphism `h : Z' ≃ₜ Z`, returns a local trivialization of the fiber bundle
`p ∘ h`.
## Implementation notes
Previously, in mathlib, there was a structure `topological_vector_bundle.trivialization` which
extended another structure `topological_fiber_bundle.trivialization` by a linearity hypothesis. As
of PR https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/17359, we have changed this to a single structure
`Trivialization` (no namespace), together with a mixin class `Trivialization.IsLinear`.
This permits all the *data* of a vector bundle to be held at the level of fiber bundles, so that the
same trivializations can underlie an object's structure as (say) a vector bundle over `ℂ` and as a
vector bundle over `ℝ`, as well as its structure simply as a fiber bundle.
This might be a little surprising, given the general trend of the library to ever-increased
bundling. But in this case the typical motivation for more bundling does not apply: there is no
algebraic or order structure on the whole type of linear (say) trivializations of a bundle.
Indeed, since trivializations only have meaning on their base sets (taking junk values outside), the
type of linear trivializations is not even particularly well-behaved.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter Set Bundle Function
open scoped Topology
variable {B : Type*} (F : Type*) {E : B → Type*}
variable {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace F] {proj : Z → B}
/-- This structure contains the information left for a local trivialization (which is implemented
below as `Trivialization F proj`) if the total space has not been given a topology, but we
have a topology on both the fiber and the base space. Through the construction
`topological_fiber_prebundle F proj` it will be possible to promote a
`Pretrivialization F proj` to a `Trivialization F proj`. -/
structure Pretrivialization (proj : Z → B) extends PartialEquiv Z (B × F) where
open_target : IsOpen target
baseSet : Set B
open_baseSet : IsOpen baseSet
source_eq : source = proj ⁻¹' baseSet
target_eq : target = baseSet ×ˢ univ
proj_toFun : ∀ p ∈ source, (toFun p).1 = proj p
namespace Pretrivialization
variable {F}
variable (e : Pretrivialization F proj) {x : Z}
/-- Coercion of a pretrivialization to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` in the `CoeFun` instance
because it is actually `e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about
`toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a
lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' : Z → (B × F) := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (Pretrivialization F proj) fun _ => Z → B × F := ⟨toFun'⟩
@[ext]
lemma ext' (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) (h₁ : e.toPartialEquiv = e'.toPartialEquiv)
(h₂ : e.baseSet = e'.baseSet) : e = e' := by
cases e; cases e'; congr
-- TODO: move `ext` here?
lemma ext {e e' : Pretrivialization F proj} (h₁ : ∀ x, e x = e' x)
(h₂ : ∀ x, e.toPartialEquiv.symm x = e'.toPartialEquiv.symm x) (h₃ : e.baseSet = e'.baseSet) :
e = e' := by
ext1 <;> [ext1; exact h₃]
· apply h₁
· apply h₂
· rw [e.source_eq, e'.source_eq, h₃]
/-- If the fiber is nonempty, then the projection also is. -/
lemma toPartialEquiv_injective [Nonempty F] :
Injective (toPartialEquiv : Pretrivialization F proj → PartialEquiv Z (B × F)) := by
refine fun e e' h ↦ ext' _ _ h ?_
simpa only [fst_image_prod, univ_nonempty, target_eq]
using congr_arg (Prod.fst '' PartialEquiv.target ·) h
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe : ⇑e.toPartialEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_fst (ex : x ∈ e.source) : (e x).1 = proj x :=
e.proj_toFun x ex
theorem mem_source : x ∈ e.source ↔ proj x ∈ e.baseSet := by rw [e.source_eq, mem_preimage]
theorem coe_fst' (ex : proj x ∈ e.baseSet) : (e x).1 = proj x :=
e.coe_fst (e.mem_source.2 ex)
protected theorem eqOn : EqOn (Prod.fst ∘ e) proj e.source := fun _ hx => e.coe_fst hx
theorem mk_proj_snd (ex : x ∈ e.source) : (proj x, (e x).2) = e x :=
Prod.ext (e.coe_fst ex).symm rfl
theorem mk_proj_snd' (ex : proj x ∈ e.baseSet) : (proj x, (e x).2) = e x :=
Prod.ext (e.coe_fst' ex).symm rfl
/-- Composition of inverse and coercion from the subtype of the target. -/
def setSymm : e.target → Z :=
e.target.restrict e.toPartialEquiv.symm
theorem mem_target {x : B × F} : x ∈ e.target ↔ x.1 ∈ e.baseSet := by
rw [e.target_eq, prod_univ, mem_preimage]
theorem proj_symm_apply {x : B × F} (hx : x ∈ e.target) : proj (e.toPartialEquiv.symm x) = x.1 := by
have := (e.coe_fst (e.map_target hx)).symm
rwa [← e.coe_coe, e.right_inv hx] at this
theorem proj_symm_apply' {b : B} {x : F} (hx : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
proj (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, x)) = b :=
e.proj_symm_apply (e.mem_target.2 hx)
theorem proj_surjOn_baseSet [Nonempty F] : Set.SurjOn proj e.source e.baseSet := fun b hb =>
let ⟨y⟩ := ‹Nonempty F›
⟨e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, y), e.toPartialEquiv.map_target <| e.mem_target.2 hb,
e.proj_symm_apply' hb⟩
theorem apply_symm_apply {x : B × F} (hx : x ∈ e.target) : e (e.toPartialEquiv.symm x) = x :=
e.toPartialEquiv.right_inv hx
theorem apply_symm_apply' {b : B} {x : F} (hx : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
e (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, x)) = (b, x) :=
e.apply_symm_apply (e.mem_target.2 hx)
theorem symm_apply_apply {x : Z} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : e.toPartialEquiv.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toPartialEquiv.left_inv hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_apply_mk_proj {x : Z} (ex : x ∈ e.source) :
e.toPartialEquiv.symm (proj x, (e x).2) = x := by
rw [← e.coe_fst ex, ← e.coe_coe, e.left_inv ex]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_symm_proj_baseSet :
e.toPartialEquiv.symm ⁻¹' (proj ⁻¹' e.baseSet) ∩ e.target = e.target := by
refine inter_eq_right.mpr fun x hx => ?_
simp only [mem_preimage, PartialEquiv.invFun_as_coe, e.proj_symm_apply hx]
exact e.mem_target.mp hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_symm_proj_inter (s : Set B) :
e.toPartialEquiv.symm ⁻¹' (proj ⁻¹' s) ∩ e.baseSet ×ˢ univ = (s ∩ e.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
suffices x ∈ e.baseSet → (proj (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (x, y)) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s) by
simpa only [prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_true, mem_univ, and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
rw [e.proj_symm_apply' h]
theorem target_inter_preimage_symm_source_eq (e f : Pretrivialization F proj) :
f.target ∩ f.toPartialEquiv.symm ⁻¹' e.source = (e.baseSet ∩ f.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [inter_comm, f.target_eq, e.source_eq, f.preimage_symm_proj_inter]
theorem trans_source (e f : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(f.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e.toPartialEquiv).source = (e.baseSet ∩ f.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source, e.target_inter_preimage_symm_source_eq]
theorem symm_trans_symm (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(e.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e'.toPartialEquiv).symm
= e'.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e.toPartialEquiv := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, PartialEquiv.symm_symm]
theorem symm_trans_source_eq (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(e.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e'.toPartialEquiv).source = (e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, e'.source_eq, PartialEquiv.symm_source, e.target_eq, inter_comm,
e.preimage_symm_proj_inter, inter_comm]
theorem symm_trans_target_eq (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(e.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e'.toPartialEquiv).target = (e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.symm_source, symm_trans_symm, symm_trans_source_eq, inter_comm]
variable (e' : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} {y : E b}
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem_source : ↑y ∈ e'.source ↔ b ∈ e'.baseSet :=
e'.mem_source
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe_fst (hb : b ∈ e'.baseSet) : (e' y).1 = b :=
e'.coe_fst (e'.mem_source.2 hb)
theorem mk_mem_target {x : B} {y : F} : (x, y) ∈ e'.target ↔ x ∈ e'.baseSet :=
e'.mem_target
theorem symm_coe_proj {x : B} {y : F} (e' : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) (h : x ∈ e'.baseSet) :
(e'.toPartialEquiv.symm (x, y)).1 = x :=
e'.proj_symm_apply' h
section Zero
variable [∀ x, Zero (E x)]
open Classical in
/-- A fiberwise inverse to `e`. This is the function `F → E b` that induces a local inverse
`B × F → TotalSpace F E` of `e` on `e.baseSet`. It is defined to be `0` outside `e.baseSet`. -/
protected noncomputable def symm (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) (b : B) (y : F) : E b :=
if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet then
cast (congr_arg E (e.proj_symm_apply' hb)) (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, y)).2
else 0
theorem symm_apply (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) :
e.symm b y = cast (congr_arg E (e.symm_coe_proj hb)) (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, y)).2 :=
dif_pos hb
theorem symm_apply_of_not_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} (hb : b ∉ e.baseSet)
(y : F) : e.symm b y = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem coe_symm_of_not_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} (hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) :
(e.symm b : F → E b) = 0 :=
funext fun _ => dif_neg hb
theorem mk_symm (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) :
TotalSpace.mk b (e.symm b y) = e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, y) := by
simp only [e.symm_apply hb, TotalSpace.mk_cast (e.proj_symm_apply' hb), TotalSpace.eta]
theorem symm_proj_apply (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) (z : TotalSpace F E)
(hz : z.proj ∈ e.baseSet) : e.symm z.proj (e z).2 = z.2 := by
rw [e.symm_apply hz, cast_eq_iff_heq, e.mk_proj_snd' hz, e.symm_apply_apply (e.mem_source.mpr hz)]
theorem symm_apply_apply_mk (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : E b) : e.symm b (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 = y :=
e.symm_proj_apply ⟨b, y⟩ hb
theorem apply_mk_symm (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) :
e ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩ = (b, y) := by
rw [e.mk_symm hb, e.apply_symm_apply (e.mk_mem_target.mpr hb)]
end Zero
end Pretrivialization
variable [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
/-- A structure extending partial homeomorphisms, defining a local trivialization of a projection
`proj : Z → B` with fiber `F`, as a partial homeomorphism between `Z` and `B × F` defined between
two sets of the form `proj ⁻¹' baseSet` and `baseSet × F`, acting trivially on the first coordinate.
-/
structure Trivialization (proj : Z → B) extends PartialHomeomorph Z (B × F) where
baseSet : Set B
open_baseSet : IsOpen baseSet
source_eq : source = proj ⁻¹' baseSet
target_eq : target = baseSet ×ˢ univ
proj_toFun : ∀ p ∈ source, (toPartialHomeomorph p).1 = proj p
namespace Trivialization
variable {F}
variable (e : Trivialization F proj) {x : Z}
@[ext]
lemma ext' (e e' : Trivialization F proj) (h₁ : e.toPartialHomeomorph = e'.toPartialHomeomorph)
(h₂ : e.baseSet = e'.baseSet) : e = e' := by
cases e; cases e'; congr
/-- Coercion of a trivialization to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` in the `CoeFun` instance
because it is actually `e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about
`toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a
lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' : Z → (B × F) := e.toFun
/-- Natural identification as a `Pretrivialization`. -/
def toPretrivialization : Pretrivialization F proj :=
{ e with }
instance : CoeFun (Trivialization F proj) fun _ => Z → B × F := ⟨toFun'⟩
instance : Coe (Trivialization F proj) (Pretrivialization F proj) :=
⟨toPretrivialization⟩
theorem toPretrivialization_injective :
Function.Injective fun e : Trivialization F proj => e.toPretrivialization := fun e e' h => by
ext1
exacts [PartialHomeomorph.toPartialEquiv_injective (congr_arg Pretrivialization.toPartialEquiv h),
congr_arg Pretrivialization.baseSet h]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe : ⇑e.toPartialHomeomorph = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_fst (ex : x ∈ e.source) : (e x).1 = proj x :=
e.proj_toFun x ex
protected theorem eqOn : EqOn (Prod.fst ∘ e) proj e.source := fun _x hx => e.coe_fst hx
theorem mem_source : x ∈ e.source ↔ proj x ∈ e.baseSet := by rw [e.source_eq, mem_preimage]
theorem coe_fst' (ex : proj x ∈ e.baseSet) : (e x).1 = proj x :=
e.coe_fst (e.mem_source.2 ex)
|
theorem mk_proj_snd (ex : x ∈ e.source) : (proj x, (e x).2) = e x :=
Prod.ext (e.coe_fst ex).symm rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/FiberBundle/Trivialization.lean | 317 | 320 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r ⟨typein r a, typein_lt_type r a⟩ = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
(enum _).map_rel_iff
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
¬r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₂ ≤ o₁ := by
rw [enum_lt_enum (r := r), not_lt]
-- TODO: generalize to other well-orders
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type (· < ·))} :
enum (· < ·) o₁ ≤ enum (α := a.toType) (· < ·) o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ := by
rw [← enum_le_enum, not_lt]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
enum r o₁ = enum r o₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq _
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r ⟨0, h0⟩) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.toType) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, type_toType _ ▸ h0⟩ ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hs⟩ := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (g.transRelIso f)]; rfl
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hr.trans_eq (Quotient.sound ⟨f⟩)⟩ :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.toType`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp]
noncomputable def enumIsoToType (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.toType where
toFun x := enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨x.1, type_toType _ ▸ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv _ := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := enum_le_enum' _
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio o) :=
⟨_, ⟨(enumIsoToType _).toEquiv⟩⟩
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_union_right]
infer_instance
instance small_Ico (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `o ≠ 0`. -/
def toTypeOrderBot {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' (by rwa [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero])
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
@[deprecated "use toTypeOrderBot" (since := "2025-02-13")]
def toTypeOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, by rwa [type_toType]⟩ =
have H := toTypeOrderBot (o := o) (by rintro rfl; simp at ho)
(⊥ : o.toType) :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, _, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (enum _) wo.wf)
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : typein s (f a) = typein r a := by
rw [← f.transPrincipal_apply _ a, (f.transPrincipal _).eq]
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `liftInitialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) : lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't seem to work. -/
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't work. -/
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg)
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) := by
refine Quotient.eq'.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a = lift.{u, v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a < lift.{u, v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_typein_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : lift.{u} (typein s f.top) = lift (type r) :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def liftInitialSeg : Ordinal.{v} ≤i Ordinal.{max u v} := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone lift.{u} (by simp),
fun a b ↦ Ordinal.inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_id'.{max u v} (type s),
← lift_umax.{v, u}, lift_type_lt] at h
obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
use typein r f.top
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_umax, lift_typein_top, lift_id']
@[simp]
theorem liftInitialSeg_coe : (liftInitialSeg.{v, u} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v, u} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
(liftInitialSeg.trans liftInitialSeg).eq liftInitialSeg a
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (card a) = card (lift.{u} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem mem_range_lift_of_le {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v} a) :
b ∈ Set.range lift.{v} :=
liftInitialSeg.mem_range_of_le h
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' ≤ a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.le_apply_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' < a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.lt_apply_iff
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal ω -/
|
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega0 : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift (typeLT ℕ)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega0
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega0]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : typeLT ℕ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 732 | 743 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
/-!
# Maps on the unit circle
In this file we prove some basic lemmas about `expMapCircle` and the restriction of `Complex.arg`
to the unit circle. These two maps define a partial equivalence between `circle` and `ℝ`, see
`circle.argPartialEquiv` and `circle.argEquiv`, that sends the whole circle to `(-π, π]`.
-/
open Complex Function Set
open Real
namespace Circle
theorem injective_arg : Injective fun z : Circle => arg z := fun z w h =>
Subtype.ext <| ext_norm_arg (z.norm_coe.trans w.norm_coe.symm) h
@[simp]
theorem arg_eq_arg {z w : Circle} : arg z = arg w ↔ z = w :=
injective_arg.eq_iff
theorem arg_exp {x : ℝ} (h₁ : -π < x) (h₂ : x ≤ π) : arg (exp x) = x := by
rw [coe_exp, exp_mul_I, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I ⟨h₁, h₂⟩]
@[simp]
theorem exp_arg (z : Circle) : exp (arg z) = z :=
injective_arg <| arg_exp (neg_pi_lt_arg _) (arg_le_pi _)
/-- `Complex.arg ∘ (↑)` and `expMapCircle` define a partial equivalence between `circle` and `ℝ`
with `source = Set.univ` and `target = Set.Ioc (-π) π`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
noncomputable def argPartialEquiv : PartialEquiv Circle ℝ where
toFun := arg ∘ (↑)
invFun := exp
source := univ
target := Ioc (-π) π
map_source' _ _ := ⟨neg_pi_lt_arg _, arg_le_pi _⟩
map_target' := mapsTo_univ _ _
left_inv' z _ := exp_arg z
right_inv' _ hx := arg_exp hx.1 hx.2
/-- `Complex.arg` and `expMapCircle` define an equivalence between `circle` and `(-π, π]`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
noncomputable def argEquiv : Circle ≃ Ioc (-π) π where
toFun z := ⟨arg z, neg_pi_lt_arg _, arg_le_pi _⟩
invFun := exp ∘ (↑)
left_inv _ := argPartialEquiv.left_inv trivial
right_inv x := Subtype.ext <| argPartialEquiv.right_inv x.2
lemma leftInverse_exp_arg : LeftInverse exp (arg ∘ (↑)) := exp_arg
lemma invOn_arg_exp : InvOn (arg ∘ (↑)) exp (Ioc (-π) π) univ := argPartialEquiv.symm.invOn
lemma surjOn_exp_neg_pi_pi : SurjOn exp (Ioc (-π) π) univ := argPartialEquiv.symm.surjOn
lemma exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ ∃ m : ℤ, x = y + m * (2 * π) := by
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_exp, coe_exp, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int]
refine exists_congr fun n => ?_
rw [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul, mul_left_inj' I_ne_zero]
norm_cast
lemma periodic_exp : Periodic exp (2 * π) := fun z ↦ exp_eq_exp.2 ⟨1, by rw [Int.cast_one, one_mul]⟩
@[simp] lemma exp_two_pi : exp (2 * π) = 1 := periodic_exp.eq.trans exp_zero
lemma exp_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : exp (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
ext <| by simpa [mul_assoc] using Complex.exp_int_mul_two_pi_mul_I n
lemma exp_two_pi_mul_int (n : ℤ) : exp (2 * π * n) = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using exp_int_mul_two_pi n
lemma exp_eq_one {r : ℝ} : exp r = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, r = n * (2 * π) := by
simp [Circle.ext_iff, Complex.exp_eq_one_iff, ← mul_assoc, Complex.I_ne_zero,
← Complex.ofReal_inj]
lemma exp_inj {r s : ℝ} : exp r = exp s ↔ r ≡ s [PMOD (2 * π)] := by
simp [AddCommGroup.ModEq, ← exp_eq_one, div_eq_one, eq_comm (a := exp r)]
lemma exp_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : exp (x - 2 * π) = exp x := periodic_exp.sub_eq x
lemma exp_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : exp (x + 2 * π) = exp x := periodic_exp x
end Circle
namespace Real.Angle
| /-- `Circle.exp`, applied to a `Real.Angle`. -/
noncomputable def toCircle (θ : Angle) : Circle := Circle.periodic_exp.lift θ
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Circle.lean | 93 | 94 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.NormalizedFactors
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file starts looking like the ring theory of $R[X]$
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {k : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero
(p : R[X]) (t : R) (hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t :=
(le_rootMultiplicity_iff hnezero).2 <|
pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : Polynomial.IsRoot p t)
(hnzd : (p.rootMultiplicity t : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(derivative p).rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
obtain ⟨g, hp, hndvd⟩ := p.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
have hm : m - 1 + 1 = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel <| (rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt
have hndvd : ¬(X - C t) ^ m ∣ derivative p := by
rw [hp, derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right _ _),
derivative_X_sub_C_pow, ← hm, pow_succ, hm, mul_comm (C _), mul_assoc,
dvd_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C t |>.pow _ |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot] at hndvd ⊢
rwa [eval_mul, eval_C, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd]
have hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ hndvd (by rw [h]; exact dvd_zero _)
exact le_antisymm (by rwa [rootMultiplicity_le_iff hnezero, hm])
(rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero _ t hnezero)
theorem isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < p.rootMultiplicity t) : (derivative^[n] p).IsRoot t :=
dvd_iff_isRoot.mp <| (dvd_pow_self _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn).trans
(pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd _ <| p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
open Finset in
theorem eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(derivative^[p.rootMultiplicity t] p).eval t =
(p.rootMultiplicity t).factorial • (p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t := by
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t with hm
conv_lhs => rw [← p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t, ← hm]
rw [iterate_derivative_mul, eval_finset_sum, sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (mem_range.mpr m.succ_pos)]
· rw [m.choose_zero_right, one_smul, eval_mul, m.sub_zero, iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow_self,
eval_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]; rfl
· intro b hb hb0
rw [iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow, eval_smul, eval_mul, eval_smul, eval_pow,
Nat.sub_sub_self (mem_range_succ_iff.mp hb), eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self,
zero_pow hb0, smul_zero, zero_mul, smul_zero]
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_contra! h'
replace hroot := hroot _ h'
simp only [IsRoot, eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity] at hroot
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := Nat.cast_dvd_cast (α := R) <| Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial h'
rw [hq, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors] at hnzd
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd.1] at hroot
exact eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero t h hroot
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
apply lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot
clear hroot
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
exact Submonoid.one_mem _
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors]
exact ⟨hnzd _ le_rfl n.succ_ne_zero, ih fun m h ↦ hnzd m (h.trans n.le_succ)⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| hm.trans_lt hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hr hnzd⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors' h hr hnzd⟩
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ 1, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h
(by rw [Nat.factorial_one, Nat.cast_one]; exact Submonoid.one_mem _)
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ p.IsRoot t ∧ (derivative p).IsRoot t := by
rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative h]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h 0 (by norm_num), h 1 (by norm_num)⟩, fun ⟨h0, h1⟩ m hm ↦ ?_⟩
obtain (_|_|m) := m
exacts [h0, h1, by omega]
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_gcd
[GCDMonoid R[X]] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ (gcd p (derivative p)).IsRoot t := by
simp_rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot h, ← dvd_iff_isRoot, dvd_gcd_iff]
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root [CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : p.IsRoot t) :
p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· rw [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
exact derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hpt <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt).ne'
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity [CharZero R] (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_cases h : p.IsRoot t
· exact (derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root h).symm.le
· rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_zero h, zero_tsub]
exact zero_le _
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative h hr⟩
/-- A sufficient condition for the set of roots of a nonzero polynomial `f` to be a subset of the
set of roots of `g` is that `f` divides `f.derivative * g`. Over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero, this is also a necessary condition.
See `isRoot_of_isRoot_iff_dvd_derivative_mul` -/
theorem isRoot_of_isRoot_of_dvd_derivative_mul [CharZero R] {f g : R[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0)
(hfd : f ∣ f.derivative * g) {a : R} (haf : f.IsRoot a) : g.IsRoot a := by
rcases hfd with ⟨r, hr⟩
have hdf0 : derivative f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! haf
rw [eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero haf] at hf0 ⊢
exact not_isRoot_C _ _ <| C_ne_zero.mp hf0
by_contra hg
have hdfg0 : f.derivative * g ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hdf0 (by rintro rfl; simp at hg)
have hr' := congr_arg (rootMultiplicity a) hr
rw [rootMultiplicity_mul hdfg0, derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root haf,
rootMultiplicity_eq_zero hg, add_zero, rootMultiplicity_mul (hr ▸ hdfg0), add_comm,
Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.succ_le_iff.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos hf0).2 haf))] at hr'
omega
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
instance instNormalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid R[X] where
normUnit p :=
⟨C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff), C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff)⁻¹, by
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1], by rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.inv_mul, C_1]⟩
normUnit_zero := Units.ext (by simp)
normUnit_mul hp0 hq0 :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at *
rw [leadingCoeff_mul, normUnit_mul hp0 hq0, Units.val_mul, C_mul])
normUnit_coe_units u :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [← mul_one u⁻¹, Units.val_mul, Units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq]
rcases Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 ⟨u, rfl⟩ with ⟨_, ⟨w, rfl⟩, h2⟩
rw [← h2, leadingCoeff_C, normUnit_coe_units, ← C_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem coe_normUnit {p : R[X]} : (normUnit p : R[X]) = C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff) := by
simp [normUnit]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_normalize (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (normalize p) = normalize (leadingCoeff p) := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem Monic.normalize_eq_self {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : normalize p = p := by
simp only [Polynomial.coe_normUnit, normalize_apply, hp.leadingCoeff, normUnit_one,
Units.val_one, Polynomial.C.map_one, mul_one]
theorem roots_normalize {p : R[X]} : (normalize p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [normalize_apply, mul_comm, coe_normUnit, roots_C_mul _ (normUnit (leadingCoeff p)).ne_zero]
theorem normUnit_X : normUnit (X : Polynomial R) = 1 := by
have := coe_normUnit (R := R) (p := X)
rwa [leadingCoeff_X, normUnit_one, Units.val_one, map_one, Units.val_eq_one] at this
theorem X_eq_normalize : (X : Polynomial R) = normalize X := by
simp only [normalize_apply, normUnit_X, Units.val_one, mul_one]
end NormalizationMonoid
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_pos_of_ne_zero_of_nonunit (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hp : ¬IsUnit p) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h] at hp0 hp
exact hp (IsUnit.map C (IsUnit.mk0 (coeff p 0) (mt C_inj.2 (by simpa using hp0))))
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [Polynomial.ext_iff]
congr!
simp [map_eq_zero, coeff_map, coeff_zero]
theorem map_ne_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
p.degree_map_eq_of_injective f.injective
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map _ f)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
simp only [← coeff_natDegree, coeff_map f, natDegree_map]
theorem monic_map_iff [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} {p : R[X]} :
(p.map f).Monic ↔ p.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_map, ← f.map_one, Function.Injective.eq_iff f.injective, Monic]
end DivisionRing
section Field
variable [Field R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero : IsUnit p ↔ degree p = 0 :=
⟨degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit, fun h =>
have : degree p ≤ 0 := by simp [*, le_refl]
have hc : coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := fun hc => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, hc] at h; simp only [map_zero] at h; contradiction
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2
⟨C (coeff p 0)⁻¹, by
conv in p => rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this]
rw [← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hc, C_1]⟩⟩
/-- Division of polynomials. See `Polynomial.divByMonic` for more details. -/
def div (p q : R[X]) :=
C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹))
/-- Remainder of polynomial division. See `Polynomial.modByMonic` for more details. -/
def mod (p q : R[X]) :=
p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)
private theorem quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux (p q : R[X]) : q * div p q + mod p q = p := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, mod, modByMonic_zero, zero_add]
· conv =>
rhs
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv h)]
rw [div, mod, add_comm, mul_assoc]
private theorem remainder_lt_aux (p : R[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) : degree (mod p q) < degree q := by
rw [← degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
exact degree_modByMonic_lt p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq)
instance : Div R[X] :=
⟨div⟩
instance : Mod R[X] :=
⟨mod⟩
theorem div_def : p / q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) :=
rfl
theorem mod_def : p % q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := rfl
theorem modByMonic_eq_mod (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p % q :=
show p %ₘ q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, mul_one, C_1]
theorem divByMonic_eq_div (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p /ₘ q = p / q :=
show p /ₘ q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, C_1, one_mul, mul_one]
theorem mod_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : R[X]) (a : R) : p % (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
modByMonic_eq_mod p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval _ _
theorem mul_div_eq_iff_isRoot : (X - C a) * (p / (X - C a)) = p ↔ IsRoot p a :=
divByMonic_eq_div p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot
instance instEuclideanDomain : EuclideanDomain R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.commRing,
Polynomial.nontrivial with
quotient := (· / ·)
quotient_zero := by simp [div_def]
remainder := (· % ·)
r := _
r_wellFounded := degree_lt_wf
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq := quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux
remainder_lt := fun _ _ hq => remainder_lt_aux _ hq
mul_left_not_lt := fun _ _ hq => not_lt_of_ge (degree_le_mul_left _ hq) }
theorem mod_eq_self_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p % q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0, fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) ≤ degree p :=
not_le_of_gt <| by rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
rw [mod_def, modByMonic, dif_pos (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
unfold divModByMonicAux
dsimp
simp only [this, false_and, if_false]⟩
theorem div_eq_zero_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p / q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => by
have := EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q
rwa [h, mul_zero, zero_add, mod_eq_self_iff hq0] at this,
fun h => by
have hlt : degree p < degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := by
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
have hm : Monic (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0
rw [div_def, (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hm).2 hlt, mul_zero]⟩
theorem degree_add_div (hq0 : q ≠ 0) (hpq : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p / q) = degree p := by
have : degree (p % q) < degree (q * (p / q)) :=
calc
degree (p % q) < degree q := EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0
_ ≤ _ := degree_le_mul_left _ (mt (div_eq_zero_iff hq0).1 (not_lt_of_ge hpq))
conv_rhs =>
rw [← EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_mul]
theorem degree_div_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p / q) ≤ degree p := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq]; exact degree_divByMonic_le _ _
theorem degree_div_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : 0 < degree q) : degree (p / q) < degree p := by
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := fun hq0 => by simp [hq0] at hq
rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]
exact degree_divByMonic_lt _ (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0) hp
(by rw [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]; exact hq)
theorem isUnit_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsUnit (p.map f) ↔ IsUnit p := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero, degree_map]
theorem map_div [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p / q).map f = p.map f / q.map f := by
if hq0 : q = 0 then simp [hq0]
else
rw [div_def, div_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_divByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0),
Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, leadingCoeff_map, map_inv₀]
theorem map_mod [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p % q).map f = p.map f % q.map f := by
by_cases hq0 : q = 0
· simp [hq0]
· rw [mod_def, mod_def, leadingCoeff_map f, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C f, ← Polynomial.map_mul f,
map_modByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
lemma natDegree_mod_lt [Field k] (p : k[X]) {q : k[X]} (hq : q.natDegree ≠ 0) :
(p % q).natDegree < q.natDegree := by
have hq' : q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hq
simp [hq]
rw [mod_def]
refine (natDegree_modByMonic_lt p ?_ ?_).trans_le ?_
· refine monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one ?_
rw [mul_inv_eq_one₀ hq']
· contrapose! hq
rw [← natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one ((inv_mul_eq_one₀ hq').mpr rfl)]
simp [hq]
· exact natDegree_mul_C_le q q.leadingCoeff⁻¹
section
open EuclideanDomain
theorem gcd_map [Field k] [DecidableEq R] [DecidableEq k] (f : R →+* k) :
gcd (p.map f) (q.map f) = (gcd p q).map f :=
GCD.induction p q (fun x => by simp_rw [Polynomial.map_zero, EuclideanDomain.gcd_zero_left])
fun x y _ ih => by rw [gcd_val, ← map_mod, ih, ← gcd_val]
end
theorem eval₂_gcd_eq_zero [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} (hf : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0)
(hg : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
rw [EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_gcd_ab f g, Polynomial.eval₂_add, Polynomial.eval₂_mul,
Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hf, hg, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem eval_gcd_eq_zero [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R}
(hf : f.eval α = 0) (hg : g.eval α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval α = 0 :=
eval₂_gcd_eq_zero hf hg
theorem root_left_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_right_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_gcd_iff_root_left_right [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ↔ f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ∧ g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨root_left_of_root_gcd h, root_right_of_root_gcd h⟩, fun h => eval₂_gcd_eq_zero h.1 h.2⟩
theorem isRoot_gcd_iff_isRoot_left_right [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).IsRoot α ↔ f.IsRoot α ∧ g.IsRoot α :=
root_gcd_iff_root_left_right
theorem isCoprime_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsCoprime (p.map f) (q.map f) ↔ IsCoprime p q := by
classical
rw [← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, ← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, gcd_map, isUnit_map]
theorem mem_roots_map [CommRing k] [IsDomain k] {f : R →+* k} {x : k} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots (map_ne_zero hp), IsRoot, Polynomial.eval_map]
theorem rootSet_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).rootSet S = {0} := by
classical
rw [rootSet, aroots_monomial ha,
Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.coe_singleton]
theorem rootSet_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : rootSet (C a * X ^ n) S = {0} := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, rootSet_monomial hn ha]
theorem rootSet_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).rootSet S = {0} := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n : R[X]), ← C_1, rootSet_C_mul_X_pow hn]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem rootSet_prod [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X])
(s : Finset ι) (h : s.prod f ≠ 0) : (s.prod f).rootSet S = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).rootSet S := by
classical
simp only [rootSet, aroots, ← Finset.mem_coe]
rw [Polynomial.map_prod, roots_prod, Finset.bind_toFinset, s.val_toFinset, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_prod, Ne, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X - C b).roots = {a⁻¹ * b} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X + C b).roots = {-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : p.roots = {-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0)} := by
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (show degree p ≤ 1 by rw [h])]
have : p.coeff 1 ≠ 0 := coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree h
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C _ this]
theorem exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : ∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
⟨-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0), by
rw [← mem_roots (by simp [← zero_le_degree_iff, h])]
simp [roots_degree_eq_one h]⟩
theorem coeff_inv_units (u : R[X]ˣ) (n : ℕ) : ((↑u : R[X]).coeff n)⁻¹ = (↑u⁻¹ : R[X]).coeff n := by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u), eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u⁻¹),
coeff_C, coeff_C, inv_eq_one_div]
split_ifs
· rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq (coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero u), coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero,
coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, ← eval_mul, ← Units.val_mul, inv_mul_cancel]
simp
· simp
theorem monic_normalize [DecidableEq R] (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : Monic (normalize p) := by
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← Ne, ← isUnit_iff_ne_zero] at hp0
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_normalize, normalize_eq_one]
apply hp0
theorem leadingCoeff_div (hpq : q.degree ≤ p.degree) :
(p / q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff / q.leadingCoeff := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
rw [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C,
leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq) _, mul_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv]
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
theorem div_C_mul : p / (C a * q) = C a⁻¹ * (p / q) := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
simp only [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, mul_inv, leadingCoeff_C, C.map_mul, mul_assoc]
congr 3
rw [mul_left_comm q, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_dvd (ha : a ≠ 0) : C a * p ∣ q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun h => dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) h, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm p, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul, hr]⟩⟩
theorem dvd_C_mul (ha : a ≠ 0) : p ∣ Polynomial.C a * q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_left_comm p, ← hr, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul]⟩,
fun h => dvd_trans h (dvd_mul_left _ _)⟩
theorem coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero [DecidableEq R] (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(normUnit p : R[X]) = C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹ := by
have : p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp
simp [CommGroupWithZero.coe_normUnit _ this]
theorem map_dvd_map' [Field k] (f : R →+* k) {x y : R[X]} : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero, zero_dvd_iff, zero_dvd_iff, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
· classical
rw [← normalize_dvd_iff, ← @normalize_dvd_iff R[X], normalize_apply, normalize_apply,
coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero H, coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero (mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 H),
leadingCoeff_map, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C, ← Polynomial.map_mul,
map_dvd_map _ f.injective (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv H)]
@[simp]
theorem degree_normalize [DecidableEq R] : degree (normalize p) = degree p := by
simp [normalize_apply]
theorem prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Prime p := by
classical
have : Prime (normalize p) :=
| Monic.prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 ▸ degree_normalize)
(monic_normalize fun hp0 => absurd hp1 (hp0.symm ▸ by simp [degree_zero]))
exact (normalize_associated _).prime this
theorem irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Irreducible p :=
(prime_of_degree_eq_one hp1).irreducible
theorem not_irreducible_C (x : R) : ¬Irreducible (C x) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/FieldDivision.lean | 573 | 580 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p.succ` is the identity away from `p.succ`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_succAbove_predAbove {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.succ) :
p.succ.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.2 h),
succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (p.castSucc_le_succ) h),
succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ <| Fin.le_of_lt h]
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
_ = n - (i % n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; exact i.modNat.rev.is_lt
end DivMod
section Rec
/-!
### recursion and induction principles
-/
end Rec
open scoped Relator in
theorem liftFun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} :
((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f ↔ ∀ i : Fin n, r (f (castSucc i)) (f i.succ) := by
| constructor
· intro H i
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,367 | 1,368 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Continuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Normed groups are uniform groups
This file proves lipschitzness of normed group operations and shows that normed groups are uniform
groups.
-/
variable {𝓕 E F : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] {s : Set E} {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_right : IsIsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : LipschitzWith C f :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe C ▸ MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖ ≤ K * ‖x‖ := by simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.dist_le_mul x 1
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖x‖₊ :=
h.norm_le_mul' hf x
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := by
simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖f x‖₊ :=
h.le_mul_norm' hf x
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz [OneHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
h.le_mul_nnnorm' (map_one f) x
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.nnnorm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| hi.norm_map_of_map_one h₁ x
end NNNorm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_norm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_norm' : LipschitzWith 1 (norm : E → ℝ) := by
simpa using LipschitzWith.dist_right (1 : E)
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm' : LipschitzWith 1 (NNNorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_norm]
theorem uniformContinuous_norm' : UniformContinuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'.uniformContinuous
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_nnnorm]
theorem uniformContinuous_nnnorm' : UniformContinuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
uniformContinuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
end SeminormedGroup
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_left : IsIsometricSMul E E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)] -- Increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)] -- Increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_left (a b : E) : dist (a / b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_div_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right] using dist_triangle (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_div_div_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_inv_inv] using dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂⁻¹ b₁ b₂⁻¹
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_div_div_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_div_div_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
@[to_additive]
theorem abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
|dist a₁ b₁ - dist a₂ b₂| ≤ dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right, dist_comm b₂] using
abs_dist_sub_le (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) (b₁ * a₂)
open Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
nndist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ nndist a₁ b₁ + nndist a₂ b₂ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
edist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ edist a₁ b₁ + edist a₂ b₂ := by
simp only [edist_nndist]
norm_cast
apply nndist_mul_mul_le
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable {α E : Type*} [SeminormedCommGroup E] [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {K Kf Kg : ℝ≥0}
{f g : α → E} {s : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma lipschitzWith_inv_iff : LipschitzWith K f⁻¹ ↔ LipschitzWith K f := by simp [LipschitzWith]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma antilipschitzWith_inv_iff : AntilipschitzWith K f⁻¹ ↔ AntilipschitzWith K f := by
simp [AntilipschitzWith]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma lipschitzOnWith_inv_iff : LipschitzOnWith K f⁻¹ s ↔ LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma locallyLipschitz_inv_iff : LocallyLipschitz f⁻¹ ↔ LocallyLipschitz f := by
simp [LocallyLipschitz]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma locallyLipschitzOn_inv_iff : LocallyLipschitzOn s f⁻¹ ↔ LocallyLipschitzOn s f := by
simp [LocallyLipschitzOn]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨LipschitzWith.of_inv, LipschitzWith.inv⟩ := lipschitzWith_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨AntilipschitzWith.of_inv, AntilipschitzWith.inv⟩ := antilipschitzWith_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.of_inv, LipschitzOnWith.inv⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨LocallyLipschitz.of_inv, LocallyLipschitz.inv⟩ := locallyLipschitz_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨LocallyLipschitzOn.of_inv, LocallyLipschitzOn.inv⟩ := locallyLipschitzOn_inv_iff
@[to_additive]
lemma LipschitzOnWith.mul (hf : LipschitzOnWith Kf f s) (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) :
LipschitzOnWith (Kf + Kg) (fun x ↦ f x * g x) s := fun x hx y hy ↦
calc
edist (f x * g x) (f y * g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) :=
edist_mul_mul_le _ _ _ _
_ ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y := add_le_add (hf hx hy) (hg hx hy)
_ = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y := (add_mul _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma LipschitzWith.mul (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (Kf + Kg) fun x ↦ f x * g x := by
simpa [← lipschitzOnWith_univ] using hf.lipschitzOnWith.mul hg.lipschitzOnWith
@[to_additive]
lemma LocallyLipschitzOn.mul (hf : LocallyLipschitzOn s f) (hg : LocallyLipschitzOn s g) :
LocallyLipschitzOn s fun x ↦ f x * g x := fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨Kf, t, ht, hKf⟩ := hf hx
obtain ⟨Kg, u, hu, hKg⟩ := hg hx
exact ⟨Kf + Kg, t ∩ u, inter_mem ht hu,
(hKf.mono Set.inter_subset_left).mul (hKg.mono Set.inter_subset_right)⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma LocallyLipschitz.mul (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) :
LocallyLipschitz fun x ↦ f x * g x := by
simpa [← locallyLipschitzOn_univ] using hf.locallyLipschitzOn.mul hg.locallyLipschitzOn
@[to_additive]
lemma LipschitzOnWith.div (hf : LipschitzOnWith Kf f s) (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) :
LipschitzOnWith (Kf + Kg) (fun x ↦ f x / g x) s := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.div (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (Kf + Kg) fun x => f x / g x := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
lemma LocallyLipschitzOn.div (hf : LocallyLipschitzOn s f) (hg : LocallyLipschitzOn s g) :
LocallyLipschitzOn s fun x ↦ f x / g x := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
lemma LocallyLipschitz.div (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) :
LocallyLipschitz fun x ↦ f x / g x := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul hg.inv
namespace AntilipschitzWith
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lipschitzWith (hf : AntilipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) (hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) :
AntilipschitzWith (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ fun x => f x * g x := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace hf.edist_ne_top
refine AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_inv, ← _root_.div_eq_inv_mul]
rw [le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.2 <| tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hK)]
rw [mul_comm, NNReal.coe_sub hK.le, sub_mul]
calc
↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :=
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
_ ≤ _ := le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul _ _ _ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_lipschitzWith (hf : AntilipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg (g / f))
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) : AntilipschitzWith (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ g := by
simpa only [Pi.div_apply, mul_div_cancel] using hf.mul_lipschitzWith hg hK
@[to_additive le_mul_norm_sub]
theorem le_mul_norm_div {f : E → F} (hf : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x y : E) :
‖x / y‖ ≤ K * ‖f x / f y‖ := by simp [← dist_eq_norm_div, hf.le_mul_dist x y]
end AntilipschitzWith
end PseudoEMetricSpace
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.to_lipschitzMul : LipschitzMul E :=
⟨⟨1 + 1, LipschitzWith.prod_fst.mul LipschitzWith.prod_snd⟩⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
/-- A seminormed group is a uniform group, i.e., multiplication and division are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[to_additive "A seminormed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and subtraction are
uniformly continuous."]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.to_isUniformGroup : IsUniformGroup E :=
⟨(LipschitzWith.prod_fst.div LipschitzWith.prod_snd).uniformContinuous⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toIsTopologicalGroup : IsTopologicalGroup E :=
| inferInstance
/-! ### SeparationQuotient -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Uniform.lean | 361 | 363 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.BigOperators
/-!
# Miscellaneous definitions, lemmas, and constructions using finsupp
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.graph`: the finset of input and output pairs with non-zero outputs.
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`: `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv.
* `Finsupp.mapDomain`: maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by a function and by summing.
* `Finsupp.comapDomain`: postcomposition of a `Finsupp` with a function injective on the preimage
of its support.
* `Finsupp.some`: restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported
function on `α`.
* `Finsupp.filter`: `filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true
and 0 otherwise.
* `Finsupp.frange`: the image of a finitely supported function on its support.
* `Finsupp.subtype_domain`: the restriction of a finitely supported function `f` to a subtype.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* This file is currently ~1600 lines long and is quite a miscellany of definitions and lemmas,
so it should be divided into smaller pieces.
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `graph` -/
section Graph
variable [Zero M]
/-- The graph of a finitely supported function over its support, i.e. the finset of input and output
pairs with non-zero outputs. -/
def graph (f : α →₀ M) : Finset (α × M) :=
f.support.map ⟨fun a => Prod.mk a (f a), fun _ _ h => (Prod.mk.inj h).1⟩
theorem mk_mem_graph_iff {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} : (a, m) ∈ f.graph ↔ f a = m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [graph, mem_map, mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, ha, rfl, -⟩
exact ⟨rfl, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff {c : α × M} {f : α →₀ M} : c ∈ f.graph ↔ f c.1 = c.2 ∧ c.2 ≠ 0 := by
cases c
exact mk_mem_graph_iff
theorem mk_mem_graph (f : α →₀ M) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ f.support) : (a, f a) ∈ f.graph :=
mk_mem_graph_iff.2 ⟨rfl, mem_support_iff.1 ha⟩
theorem apply_eq_of_mem_graph {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} (h : (a, m) ∈ f.graph) : f a = m :=
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).1
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut instance for `mem_graph_iff`.
theorem not_mem_graph_snd_zero (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (a, (0 : M)) ∉ f.graph := fun h =>
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).2.irrefl
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_graph [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) : f.graph.image Prod.fst = f.support := by
classical
simp only [graph, map_eq_image, image_image, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.comp_def, image_id']
theorem graph_injective (α M) [Zero M] : Injective (@graph α M _) := by
intro f g h
classical
have hsup : f.support = g.support := by rw [← image_fst_graph, h, image_fst_graph]
refine ext_iff'.2 ⟨hsup, fun x hx => apply_eq_of_mem_graph <| h.symm ▸ ?_⟩
exact mk_mem_graph _ (hsup ▸ hx)
@[simp]
theorem graph_inj {f g : α →₀ M} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem graph_zero : graph (0 : α →₀ M) = ∅ := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem graph_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.graph = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff' graph_zero
end Graph
end Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
namespace Finsupp
section Equiv
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf' : f.symm 0 = 0) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f hf : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm hf' : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_refl : mapRange.equiv (Equiv.refl M) rfl rfl = Equiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
Equiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.equiv_trans (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf') (f₂ : N ≃ P) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (hf₂') :
(mapRange.equiv (f.trans f₂) (by rw [Equiv.trans_apply, hf, hf₂])
(by rw [Equiv.symm_trans_apply, hf₂', hf']) :
(α →₀ _) ≃ _) =
(mapRange.equiv f hf hf').trans (mapRange.equiv f₂ hf₂ hf₂') :=
Equiv.ext <| mapRange_comp f₂ hf₂ f hf ((congrArg f₂ hf).trans hf₂)
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_symm (f : M ≃ N) (hf hf') :
((mapRange.equiv f hf hf').symm : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) = mapRange.equiv f.symm hf' hf :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end Equiv
section ZeroHom
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Composition with a fixed zero-preserving homomorphism is itself a zero-preserving homomorphism
on functions. -/
@[simps]
def mapRange.zeroHom (f : ZeroHom M N) : ZeroHom (α →₀ M) (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_id : mapRange.zeroHom (ZeroHom.id M) = ZeroHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
ZeroHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_comp (f : ZeroHom N P) (f₂ : ZeroHom M N) :
(mapRange.zeroHom (f.comp f₂) : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) =
(mapRange.zeroHom f).comp (mapRange.zeroHom f₂) :=
ZeroHom.ext <| mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
end ZeroHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Composition with a fixed additive homomorphism is itself an additive homomorphism on functions.
-/
@[simps]
def mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ N where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
-- Porting note: need either `dsimp only` or to specify `hf`:
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' := mapRange_add (hf := f.map_zero) f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_id :
mapRange.addMonoidHom (AddMonoidHom.id M) = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp (f : N →+ P) (f₂ : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f.comp f₂) : (α →₀ _) →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom f₂) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <|
mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom (f : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).toZeroHom = (mapRange.zeroHom f.toZeroHom : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) :=
ZeroHom.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_multiset_sum (f : F) (m : Multiset (α →₀ M)) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) m.sum = (m.map fun x => mapRange f (map_zero f) x).sum :=
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ _) →+ _).map_multiset_sum _
theorem mapRange_finset_sum (f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (∑ x ∈ s, g x) = ∑ x ∈ s, mapRange f (map_zero f) (g x) :=
map_sum (mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N)) _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange.AddMonoidHom` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.addEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ N) :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl }
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_refl : mapRange.addEquiv (AddEquiv.refl M) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_trans (f : M ≃+ N) (f₂ : N ≃+ P) :
(mapRange.addEquiv (f.trans f₂) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ P)) =
(mapRange.addEquiv f).trans (mapRange.addEquiv f₂) :=
AddEquiv.ext (mapRange_comp _ f₂.map_zero _ f.map_zero (by simp))
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_symm (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f).symm : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) = mapRange.addEquiv f.symm :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) : _ →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ _) →+ _) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) :
↑(mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) =
(mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) f.map_zero f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end AddMonoidHom
end Finsupp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `equivCongrLeft` -/
section EquivCongrLeft
variable [Zero M]
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, we can map `l : α →₀ M` to `equivMapDomain f l : β →₀ M` (computably)
by mapping the support forwards and the function backwards. -/
def equivMapDomain (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := l.support.map f.toEmbedding
toFun a := l (f.symm a)
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [Finset.mem_map_equiv, mem_support_toFun]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (b : β) :
equivMapDomain f l b = l (f.symm b) :=
rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : β →₀ M) (a : α) :
equivMapDomain f.symm l a = l (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_refl (l : α →₀ M) : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) l = l := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_refl' : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) = @id (α →₀ M) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain (f.trans g) l = equivMapDomain g (equivMapDomain f l) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans' (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
@equivMapDomain _ _ M _ (f.trans g) = equivMapDomain g ∘ equivMapDomain f := by ext x; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_single (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : M) :
equivMapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b := by
classical
ext x
simp only [single_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, equivMapDomain_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_zero {f : α ≃ β} : equivMapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) := by
ext; simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_equivMapDomain [CommMonoid N] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (g : β → M → N) :
prod (equivMapDomain f l) g = prod l (fun a m => g (f a) m) := by
simp [prod, equivMapDomain]
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, the finitely supported function spaces are also in bijection:
`(α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M)`.
This is the finitely-supported version of `Equiv.piCongrLeft`. -/
def equivCongrLeft (f : α ≃ β) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M) := by
refine ⟨equivMapDomain f, equivMapDomain f.symm, fun f => ?_, fun f => ?_⟩ <;> ext x <;>
simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : equivCongrLeft f l = equivMapDomain f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_symm (f : α ≃ β) :
(@equivCongrLeft _ _ M _ f).symm = equivCongrLeft f.symm :=
rfl
end Finsupp
end EquivCongrLeft
section CastFinsupp
variable [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M)
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommSemiring R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_sum _ _
end Nat
namespace Int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommRing R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommGroupWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_sum _ _
end Int
namespace Rat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_sum _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [Field R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
end Rat
end CastFinsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapDomain` -/
namespace Finsupp
section MapDomain
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {v v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `mapDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `a : β` is the sum
of `v x` over all `x` such that `f x = a`. -/
def mapDomain (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M :=
v.sum fun a => single (f a)
theorem mapDomain_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum_eq_single a, single_eq_same]
· intro b _ hba
exact single_eq_of_ne (hf.ne hba)
· intro _
rw [single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem mapDomain_notin_range {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f x a = 0 := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun a' _ => single_eq_of_ne fun eq => h <| eq ▸ Set.mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_id : mapDomain id v = v :=
sum_single _
theorem mapDomain_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
mapDomain (g ∘ f) v = mapDomain g (mapDomain f v) := by
refine ((sum_sum_index ?_ ?_).trans ?_).symm
· intro
exact single_zero _
· intro
exact single_add _
refine sum_congr fun _ _ => sum_single_index ?_
exact single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_single {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : M} : mapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b :=
sum_single_index <| single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_zero {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) :=
sum_zero_index
theorem mapDomain_congr {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ x ∈ v.support, f x = g x) :
v.mapDomain f = v.mapDomain g :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ H => by simp only [h _ H]
theorem mapDomain_add {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) = mapDomain f v₁ + mapDomain f v₂ :=
sum_add_index' (fun _ => single_zero _) fun _ => single_add _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_equiv_apply {f : α ≃ β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) :
mapDomain f x a = x (f.symm a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply a]
exact mapDomain_apply f.injective _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α → β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun := mapDomain f
map_zero' := mapDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := mapDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_id : mapDomain.addMonoidHom id = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_id
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f ∘ g) : (α →₀ M) →+ γ →₀ M) =
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom g) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_comp
theorem mapDomain_finset_sum {f : α → β} {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (∑ i ∈ s, v i) = ∑ i ∈ s, mapDomain f (v i) :=
map_sum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) _ _
theorem mapDomain_sum [Zero N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ N} {v : α → N → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
map_finsuppSum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M) _ _
theorem mapDomain_support [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} :
(s.mapDomain f).support ⊆ s.support.image f :=
Finset.Subset.trans support_sum <|
Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.biUnion_mono fun _ _ => support_single_subset) <| by
rw [Finset.biUnion_singleton]
theorem mapDomain_apply' (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (hS : (x.support : Set α) ⊆ S)
(hf : Set.InjOn f S) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ S) : mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
classical
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
simp_rw [single_apply]
by_cases hax : a ∈ x.support
· rw [← Finset.add_sum_erase _ _ hax, if_pos rfl]
convert add_zero (x a)
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact (hf.mono hS).ne (Finset.mem_of_mem_erase hi) hax (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hi)
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hax]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact hf.ne (hS hi) ha (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hax)
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (s : α →₀ M)
(hf : Set.InjOn f s.support) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm mapDomain_support <| by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Ne] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx_w, hx_h_left, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_iff, Ne]
rw [mapDomain_apply' (↑s.support : Set _) _ _ hf]
· exact hx_h_left
· simp only [mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Ne]
exact hx_h_left
· exact Subset.refl _
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injective [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : α →₀ M) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
mapDomain_support_of_injOn s hf.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(h_zero : ∀ b, h b 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀ b m₁ m₂, h b (m₁ + m₂) = h b m₁ * h b m₂) :
(mapDomain f s).prod h = s.prod fun a m => h (f a) m :=
(prod_sum_index h_zero h_add).trans <| prod_congr fun _ _ => prod_single_index (h_zero _)
-- Note that in `prod_mapDomain_index`, `M` is still an additive monoid,
-- so there is no analogous version in terms of `MonoidHom`.
/-- A version of `sum_mapDomain_index` that takes a bundled `AddMonoidHom`,
rather than separate linearity hypotheses.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom [AddCommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M}
(h : β → M →+ N) : ((mapDomain f s).sum fun b m => h b m) = s.sum fun a m => h (f a) m :=
sum_mapDomain_index (fun b => (h b).map_zero) (fun b _ _ => (h b).map_add _ _)
theorem embDomain_eq_mapDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : embDomain f v = mapDomain f v := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [mapDomain_apply f.injective, embDomain_apply]
· rw [mapDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range] <;> assumption
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index_inj [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (s.mapDomain f).prod h = s.prod fun a b => h (f a) b := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk f hf, ← embDomain_eq_mapDomain, prod_embDomain]
theorem mapDomain_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) := by
intro v₁ v₂ eq
ext a
have : mapDomain f v₁ (f a) = mapDomain f v₂ (f a) := by rw [eq]
rwa [mapDomain_apply hf, mapDomain_apply hf] at this
/-- When `f` is an embedding we have an embedding `(α →₀ ℕ) ↪ (β →₀ ℕ)` given by `mapDomain`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ ℕ) ↪ β →₀ ℕ :=
⟨Finsupp.mapDomain f, Finsupp.mapDomain_injective f.injective⟩
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (g : M →+ N) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom g) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom g).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) := by
ext
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Finsupp.mapRange_single, Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_apply,
Finsupp.singleAddHom_apply, eq_self_iff_true, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.mapDomain_single,
Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_apply]
/-- When `g` preserves addition, `mapRange` and `mapDomain` commute. -/
theorem mapDomain_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) (g : M → N) (h0 : g 0 = 0)
(hadd : ∀ x y, g (x + y) = g x + g y) :
mapDomain f (mapRange g h0 v) = mapRange g h0 (mapDomain f v) :=
let g' : M →+ N :=
{ toFun := g
map_zero' := h0
map_add' := hadd }
DFunLike.congr_fun (mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange f g') v
theorem sum_update_add [AddZeroClass α] [AddCommMonoid β] (f : ι →₀ α) (i : ι) (a : α)
(g : ι → α → β) (hg : ∀ i, g i 0 = 0)
(hgg : ∀ (j : ι) (a₁ a₂ : α), g j (a₁ + a₂) = g j a₁ + g j a₂) :
(f.update i a).sum g + g i (f i) = f.sum g + g i a := by
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg]
conv_rhs => rw [← Finsupp.update_self f i]
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg, add_assoc, add_assoc]
congr 1
rw [add_comm, sum_single_index (hg _), sum_single_index (hg _)]
theorem mapDomain_injOn (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (hf : Set.InjOn f S) :
Set.InjOn (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) { w | (w.support : Set α) ⊆ S } := by
intro v₁ hv₁ v₂ hv₂ eq
ext a
classical
by_cases h : a ∈ v₁.support ∪ v₂.support
· rw [← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₁ hf _, ← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₂ hf _, eq] <;>
· apply Set.union_subset hv₁ hv₂
exact mod_cast h
· simp only [not_or, mem_union, not_not, mem_support_iff] at h
simp [h]
theorem equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain {M} [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain f l = mapDomain f l := by ext x; simp [mapDomain_equiv_apply]
end MapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `comapDomain` -/
section ComapDomain
/-- Given `f : α → β`, `l : β →₀ M` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on
the preimage of `l.support`, `comapDomain f l hf` is the finitely supported function
from `α` to `M` given by composing `l` with `f`. -/
@[simps support]
def comapDomain [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support)) :
α →₀ M where
support := l.support.preimage f hf
toFun a := l (f a)
mem_support_toFun := by
intro a
simp only [Finset.mem_def.symm, Finset.mem_preimage]
exact l.mem_support_toFun (f a)
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_apply [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support))
(a : α) : comapDomain f l hf a = l (f a) :=
rfl
theorem sum_comapDomain [Zero M] [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (g : β → M → N)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) :
(comapDomain f l hf.injOn).sum (g ∘ f) = l.sum g := by
simp only [sum, comapDomain_apply, (· ∘ ·), comapDomain]
exact Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij f _ hf fun x => g x (l x)
theorem eq_zero_of_comapDomain_eq_zero [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) : comapDomain f l hf.injOn = 0 → l = 0 := by
rw [← support_eq_empty, ← support_eq_empty, comapDomain]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, mem_preimage]
intro h a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hf.2.2 ha
exact h b (hb.2.symm ▸ ha)
section FInjective
section Zero
variable [Zero M]
lemma embDomain_comapDomain {f : α ↪ β} {g : β →₀ M} (hg : ↑g.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
embDomain f (comapDomain f g f.injective.injOn) = g := by
ext b
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hb
rw [embDomain_apply, comapDomain_apply]
· replace hg : g b = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.mp <| mt (hg ·) hb
rw [embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ hb, hg]
/-- Note the `hif` argument is needed for this to work in `rw`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_zero (f : α → β)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(0 : β →₀ M).support) := Finset.coe_empty ▸ (Set.injOn_empty f)) :
comapDomain f (0 : β →₀ M) hif = (0 : α →₀ M) := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_single (f : α → β) (a : α) (m : M)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' (single (f a) m).support)) :
comapDomain f (Finsupp.single (f a) m) hif = Finsupp.single a m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp only [single_zero, comapDomain_zero]
· rw [eq_single_iff, comapDomain_apply, comapDomain_support, ← Finset.coe_subset, coe_preimage,
support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton, coe_singleton, single_eq_same]
rw [support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton] at hif
exact ⟨fun x hx => hif hx rfl hx, rfl⟩
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {f : α → β}
theorem comapDomain_add (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) (hv₁ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₁.support))
(hv₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₂.support)) (hv₁₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(v₁ + v₂).support)) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hv₁₂ = comapDomain f v₁ hv₁ + comapDomain f v₂ hv₂ := by
ext
simp only [comapDomain_apply, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
/-- A version of `Finsupp.comapDomain_add` that's easier to use. -/
theorem comapDomain_add_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hf.injOn =
comapDomain f v₁ hf.injOn + comapDomain f v₂ hf.injOn :=
comapDomain_add _ _ _ _ _
/-- `Finsupp.comapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def comapDomain.addMonoidHom (hf : Function.Injective f) : (β →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun x := comapDomain f x hf.injOn
map_zero' := comapDomain_zero f
map_add' := comapDomain_add_of_injective hf
end AddZeroClass
variable [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → β)
theorem mapDomain_comapDomain (hf : Function.Injective f) (l : β →₀ M)
(hl : ↑l.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f (comapDomain f l hf.injOn) = l := by
conv_rhs => rw [← embDomain_comapDomain (f := ⟨f, hf⟩) hl (M := M), embDomain_eq_mapDomain]
rfl
end FInjective
end ComapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is an `Option` type -/
section Option
/-- Restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported function on `α`. -/
def some [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) : α →₀ M :=
f.comapDomain Option.some fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem some_apply [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) (a : α) : f.some a = f (Option.some a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem some_zero [Zero M] : (0 : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_add [AddZeroClass M] (f g : Option α →₀ M) : (f + g).some = f.some + g.some := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_none [Zero M] (m : M) : (single none m : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_some [Zero M] (a : α) (m : M) :
(single (Option.some a) m : Option α →₀ M).some = single a m := by
classical
ext b
simp [single_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_option_index [AddZeroClass M] [CommMonoid N] (f : Option α →₀ M)
(b : Option α → M → N) (h_zero : ∀ o, b o 0 = 1)
(h_add : ∀ o m₁ m₂, b o (m₁ + m₂) = b o m₁ * b o m₂) :
f.prod b = b none (f none) * f.some.prod fun a => b (Option.some a) := by
classical
induction f using induction_linear with
| zero => simp [some_zero, h_zero]
| add f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ =>
rw [Finsupp.prod_add_index, h₁, h₂, some_add, Finsupp.prod_add_index]
· simp only [h_add, Pi.add_apply, Finsupp.coe_add]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
all_goals simp [h_zero, h_add]
| single a m => cases a <;> simp [h_zero, h_add]
theorem sum_option_index_smul [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (f : Option α →₀ R)
(b : Option α → M) :
(f.sum fun o r => r • b o) = f none • b none + f.some.sum fun a r => r • b (Option.some a) :=
f.sum_option_index _ (fun _ => zero_smul _ _) fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
theorem eq_option_embedding_update_none_iff [Zero M] {n : Option α →₀ M} {m : α →₀ M} {i : M} :
(n = (embDomain Embedding.some m).update none i) ↔
n none = i ∧ n.some = m := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff, Option.forall, Finsupp.ext_iff]
apply and_congr
· simp
· apply forall_congr'
intro
simp only [coe_update, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, update_of_ne, some_apply]
rw [← Embedding.some_apply, embDomain_apply, Embedding.some_apply]
@[simp] lemma some_embDomain_some [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : (f.embDomain .some).some = f := by
ext; rw [some_apply]; exact embDomain_apply _ _ _
@[simp] lemma embDomain_some_none [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : f.embDomain .some .none = 0 :=
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ (by simp)
end Option
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.filter` -/
section Filter
section Zero
variable [Zero M] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M)
/--
`Finsupp.filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true and `0`
otherwise. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
toFun a := if p a then f a else 0
support := f.support.filter p
mem_support_toFun a := by
split_ifs with h <;>
· simp only [h, mem_filter, mem_support_iff]
tauto
theorem filter_apply (a : α) : f.filter p a = if p a then f a else 0 := rfl
theorem filter_eq_indicator : ⇑(f.filter p) = Set.indicator { x | p x } f := by
ext
simp [filter_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
theorem filter_eq_zero_iff : f.filter p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem filter_eq_self_iff : f.filter p = f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, Set.indicator_apply_eq_self, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
not_imp_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_pos {a : α} (h : p a) : f.filter p a = f a := if_pos h
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_neg {a : α} (h : ¬p a) : f.filter p a = 0 := if_neg h
@[simp]
theorem support_filter : (f.filter p).support = {x ∈ f.support | p x} := rfl
theorem filter_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).filter p = 0 := by
classical rw [← support_eq_empty, support_filter, support_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_pos {a : α} {b : M} (h : p a) : (single a b).filter p = single a b :=
(filter_eq_self_iff _ _).2 fun _ hx => (single_apply_ne_zero.1 hx).1.symm ▸ h
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_neg {a : α} {b : M} (h : ¬p a) : (single a b).filter p = 0 :=
(filter_eq_zero_iff _ _).2 fun _ hpx =>
single_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hxa => absurd hpx (hxa.symm ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_index [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g = ∏ x ∈ (f.filter p).support, g x (f x) := by
classical
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [support_filter, Finset.mem_filter] at hx
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ hx.2]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g * (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g = f.prod g := by
classical simp_rw [prod_filter_index, support_filter, Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not,
Finsupp.prod]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_div_prod_filter [CommGroup G] (g : α → M → G) :
f.prod g / (f.filter p).prod g = (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not _ _ _).symm
end Zero
theorem filter_pos_add_filter_neg [AddZeroClass M] (f : α →₀ M) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(f.filter p + f.filter fun a => ¬p a) = f :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [coe_add, filter_eq_indicator]
exact Set.indicator_self_add_compl { x | p x } f
end Filter
/-! ### Declarations about `frange` -/
section Frange
variable [Zero M]
/-- `frange f` is the image of `f` on the support of `f`. -/
def frange (f : α →₀ M) : Finset M :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
Finset.image f f.support
theorem mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} {y : M} : y ∈ f.frange ↔ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ x, f x = y := by
rw [frange, @Finset.mem_image _ _ (Classical.decEq _) _ f.support]
exact ⟨fun ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ => ⟨hx2 ▸ mem_support_iff.1 hx1, x, hx2⟩, fun ⟨hy, x, hx⟩ =>
⟨x, mem_support_iff.2 (hx.symm ▸ hy), hx⟩⟩
theorem zero_not_mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} : (0 : M) ∉ f.frange := fun H => (mem_frange.1 H).1 rfl
theorem frange_single {x : α} {y : M} : frange (single x y) ⊆ {y} := fun r hr =>
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := mem_frange.1 hr
ht2 ▸ by
classical
rw [single_apply] at ht2 ⊢
split_ifs at ht2 ⊢
· exact Finset.mem_singleton_self _
· exact (t ht2.symm).elim
end Frange
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.subtypeDomain` -/
section SubtypeDomain
section Zero
variable [Zero M] {p : α → Prop}
/--
`subtypeDomain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function `f` to subtype `p`. -/
def subtypeDomain (p : α → Prop) (f : α →₀ M) : Subtype p →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decPred p
f.support.subtype p
toFun := f ∘ Subtype.val
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [@mem_subtype _ _ (Classical.decPred p), mem_support_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_subtypeDomain [D : DecidablePred p] {f : α →₀ M} :
(subtypeDomain p f).support = f.support.subtype p := by rw [Subsingleton.elim D] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_apply {a : Subtype p} {v : α →₀ M} : (subtypeDomain p v) a = v a.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_zero : subtypeDomain p (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall {f g : α →₀ M} :
f.subtypeDomain p = g.subtypeDomain p ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = g x := by
simp_rw [DFunLike.ext_iff, subtypeDomain_apply, Subtype.forall]
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_iff {f g : α →₀ M}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ g.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = g.subtypeDomain p ↔ f = g :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall.trans
⟨fun H ↦ Finsupp.ext fun _a ↦ (em _).elim (H _ <| hf _ ·) fun haf ↦ (em _).elim (H _ <| hg _ ·)
fun hag ↦ (not_mem_support_iff.mp haf).trans (not_mem_support_iff.mp hag).symm,
fun H _ _ ↦ congr($H _)⟩
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff' {f : α →₀ M} : f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall (g := 0)
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff {f : α →₀ M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff (g := 0) hf (by simp)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtypeDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {v : α →₀ M} {h : α → M → N}
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.support, p x) : (v.subtypeDomain p).prod (fun a b ↦ h a b) = v.prod h := by
refine Finset.prod_bij (fun p _ ↦ p) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ M}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_add {v v' : α →₀ M} :
(v + v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p + v'.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- `subtypeDomain` but as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ M) →+ Subtype p →₀ M where
toFun := subtypeDomain p
map_zero' := subtypeDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := subtypeDomain_add
/-- `Finsupp.filter` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def filterAddHom (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun := filter p
map_zero' := filter_zero p
map_add' f g := DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [filter_eq_indicator, coe_add]
exact Set.indicator_add { x | p x } f g
@[simp]
theorem filter_add [DecidablePred p] {v v' : α →₀ M} :
(v + v').filter p = v.filter p + v'.filter p :=
(filterAddHom p).map_add v v'
end AddZeroClass
section CommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {p : α → Prop}
theorem subtypeDomain_sum {s : Finset ι} {h : ι → α →₀ M} :
(∑ c ∈ s, h c).subtypeDomain p = ∑ c ∈ s, (h c).subtypeDomain p :=
map_sum subtypeDomainAddMonoidHom _ s
theorem subtypeDomain_finsupp_sum [Zero N] {s : β →₀ N} {h : β → N → α →₀ M} :
(s.sum h).subtypeDomain p = s.sum fun c d => (h c d).subtypeDomain p :=
subtypeDomain_sum
theorem filter_sum [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α →₀ M) :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a).filter p = ∑ a ∈ s, filter p (f a) :=
map_sum (filterAddHom p) f s
theorem filter_eq_sum (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) :
f.filter p = ∑ i ∈ f.support.filter p, single i (f i) :=
(f.filter p).sum_single.symm.trans <|
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => by
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
end CommMonoid
section Group
variable [AddGroup G] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ G}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_neg : (-v).subtypeDomain p = -v.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_sub : (v - v').subtypeDomain p = v.subtypeDomain p - v'.subtypeDomain p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem filter_neg (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ G) : filter p (-f) = -filter p f :=
(filterAddHom p : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_neg f
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ G) :
filter p (f₁ - f₂) = filter p f₁ - filter p f₂ :=
(filterAddHom p : (_ →₀ G) →+ _).map_sub f₁ f₂
end Group
end SubtypeDomain
theorem mem_support_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid M] {s : Multiset (α →₀ M)} (a : α) :
a ∈ s.sum.support → ∃ f ∈ s, a ∈ (f : α →₀ M).support :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun h => False.elim (by simp at h))
(by
intro f s ih ha
by_cases h : a ∈ f.support
· exact ⟨f, Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
· simp only [Multiset.sum_cons, mem_support_iff, add_apply, not_mem_support_iff.1 h,
zero_add] at ha
rcases ih (mem_support_iff.2 ha) with ⟨f', h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨f', Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem h₀, h₁⟩)
theorem mem_support_finset_sum [AddCommMonoid M] {s : Finset ι} {h : ι → α →₀ M} (a : α)
(ha : a ∈ (∑ c ∈ s, h c).support) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ∈ (h c).support :=
let ⟨_, hf, hfa⟩ := mem_support_multiset_sum a ha
let ⟨c, hc, Eq⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.1 hf
| ⟨c, hc, Eq.symm ▸ hfa⟩
/-! ### Declarations about `curry` and `uncurry` -/
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean | 1,050 | 1,052 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
## References
* [Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.][Hytonen_VanNeerven_Veraar_Wies_2016]
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : ℕ → α} {m : ℕ}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· simp [Set.preimage, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_cod
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_dom
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {b : β} : StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one [One β] : StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) := stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
section aux
omit [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete`. -/
private noncomputable def simpleFuncAux (f : α → β) (g : ℕ → α) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β
| 0 => .const _ (f (g 0))
| n + 1 => .piecewise {g n} (.singleton _) (.const _ <| f (g n)) (simpleFuncAux f g n)
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt : ∀ n > m, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m)
| _, .refl => by simp [simpleFuncAux]
| _, Nat.le.step (m := n) hmn => by
obtain hnm | hnm := eq_or_ne (g n) (g m) <;>
simp [simpleFuncAux, Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem , hnm.symm, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt _ hmn]
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m) :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨_, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt⟩
end aux
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete [Countable α] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
nontriviality β
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_surjective_nat α
exact ⟨simpleFuncAux f g, hg.forall.2 fun m ↦
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq⟩
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete (since := "2025-04-09")]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] : StronglyMeasurable f := .of_discrete
end StronglyMeasurable
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀ h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq, ← Finset.mem_coe]
classical
refine fun n => measure_biUnion_lt_top {y ∈ (fs n).range | y ≠ 0}.finite_toSet fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
protected theorem prodMk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prodMk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] protected alias prod_mk := StronglyMeasurable.prodMk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_right
protected theorem prod_swap {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β × α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
protected theorem fst {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_fst
protected theorem snd [mα : MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk stronglyMeasurable_const)
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Max β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Min β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : IsEmbedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : IsClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.injective.preimage_image] at this
/-- A sequential limit of strongly measurable functions is strongly measurable. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
StronglyMeasurable g := by
borelize β
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' u (fun i => (hf i).measurable) lim
· rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ i, range (f (v i)))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun i => (hf (v i)).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto ((lim x).comp hv)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
protected theorem piecewise {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
{_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (Set.piecewise s f g) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hf.tendsto_approx x
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hg.tendsto_approx x
/-- this is slightly different from `StronglyMeasurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`StronglyMeasurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact StronglyMeasurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) stronglyMeasurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_const`, but replacing `StronglyMeasurable.ite` by
`StronglyMeasurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
protected theorem ite {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {p : α → Prop}
{_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a }) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
StronglyMeasurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {g' : γ → β}
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg' : StronglyMeasurable g') :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.extend g f g') := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.extend (hf.approx n) g hg (hg'.approx n), ?_⟩
intro x
by_cases hx : ∃ y, g y = x
· rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa only [SimpleFunc.extend_apply, hg.injective, Injective.extend_apply] using
hf.tendsto_approx y
· simpa only [hx, SimpleFunc.extend_apply', not_false_iff, extend_apply'] using
hg'.tendsto_approx x
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hne : γ → Nonempty β) :
∃ f' : γ → β, StronglyMeasurable f' ∧ f' ∘ g = f :=
⟨Function.extend g f fun x => Classical.choice (hne x),
hg.stronglyMeasurable_extend hf (stronglyMeasurable_const' fun _ _ => rfl),
funext fun _ => hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : StronglyMeasurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : StronglyMeasurable fun a : t => f a) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality β; inhabit β
suffices Function.extend Subtype.val (fun x : s ↦ f x)
(Function.extend (↑) (fun x : t ↦ f x) fun _ ↦ default) = f from
this ▸ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).stronglyMeasurable_extend hc <|
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe ht).stronglyMeasurable_extend hd stronglyMeasurable_const
ext x
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· lift x to s using hxs
simp [Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
· lift x to t using (h trivial).resolve_left hxs
rw [extend_apply', Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply]
exact fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ hxs <| hy ▸ y.2
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h₁ : StronglyMeasurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : StronglyMeasurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁
h₂
@[measurability]
protected theorem indicator {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant indicator functions of measurable sets and that it is closed under
addition and pointwise limit.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction with`. -/
theorem induction [MeasurableSpace α] [AddZeroClass β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(ind : ∀ c ⦃s : Set α⦄ (hs : MeasurableSet s),
P (s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) (stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator hs))
(add : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hfg : StronglyMeasurable (f + g)), Disjoint f.support g.support →
P f hf → P g hg → P (f + g) hfg)
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n using SimpleFunc.induction with
| const c hs => exact ind c hs
| @add f g h_supp hf hg =>
exact add f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable (f + g).stronglyMeasurable h_supp hf hg
open scoped Classical in
/-- To prove that a property holds for any strongly measurable function, it is enough to show
that it holds for constant functions and that it is closed under piecewise combination of functions
and pointwise limits.
To use in an induction proof, the syntax is
`induction f, hf using StronglyMeasurable.induction' with`. -/
theorem induction' [MeasurableSpace α] [Nonempty β] [TopologicalSpace β]
{P : (f : α → β) → StronglyMeasurable f → Prop}
(const : ∀ (c), P (fun _ ↦ c) stronglyMeasurable_const)
(pcw : ∀ ⦃f g : α → β⦄ {s} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s), P f hf → P g hg → P (s.piecewise f g) (hf.piecewise hs hg))
(lim : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → α → β⦄ ⦃g : α → β⦄ (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g), (∀ n, P (f n) (hf n)) →
(∀ x, Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) → P g hg)
(f : α → β) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : P f hf := by
let s := hf.approx
refine lim (fun n ↦ (s n).stronglyMeasurable) hf (fun n ↦ ?_) hf.tendsto_approx
change P (s n) (s n).stronglyMeasurable
induction s n with
| const c => exact const c
| @pcw f g s hs Pf Pg =>
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact pcw f.stronglyMeasurable g.stronglyMeasurable hs Pf Pg
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem dist {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f g : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => dist (f x) (g x) :=
continuous_dist.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[measurability]
protected theorem norm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
@[measurability]
protected theorem nnnorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
/-- The `enorm` of a strongly measurable function is measurable.
Unlike `StrongMeasurable.norm` and `StronglyMeasurable.nnnorm`, this lemma proves measurability,
**not** strong measurability. This is an intentional decision: for functions taking values in
ℝ≥0∞, measurability is much more useful than strong measurability. -/
@[fun_prop, measurability]
protected theorem enorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {β : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β]
{f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
(ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf.nnnorm).measurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias ennnorm := StronglyMeasurable.enorm
@[measurability]
protected theorem real_toNNReal {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x).toNNReal :=
continuous_real_toNNReal.comp_stronglyMeasurable hf
section PseudoMetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Preorder E] [OrderClosedTopology E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_le (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a ≤ g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_le_prod.measurableSet
lemma measurableSet_lt (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a < g a} := by
simpa only [lt_iff_le_not_le] using (hf.measurableSet_le hg).inter (hg.measurableSet_le hf).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyLE, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_le hg).compl
lemma ae_le_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_le_of_ae_le_trim, ae_le_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end PseudoMetrizableSpace
section MetrizableSpace
variable {E : Type*} {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure[m₀] α} {f g : α → E}
[TopologicalSpace E] [MetrizableSpace E]
lemma measurableSet_eq_fun (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
MeasurableSet[m] {a | f a = g a} := by
borelize (E × E)
exact (hf.prodMk hg).measurable isClosed_diagonal.measurableSet
lemma ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm]
exact (hf.measurableSet_eq_fun hg).compl
lemma ae_eq_trim_iff (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable[m] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim, ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf hg⟩
end MetrizableSpace
theorem stronglyMeasurable_in_set {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {s : Set α}
{f : α → β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hf_zero : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) :
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β,
(∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))) ∧ ∀ x ∉ s, ∀ n, fs n x = 0 := by
let g_seq_s : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n => (hf.approx n).restrict s
have hg_eq : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ n, g_seq_s n x = hf.approx n x := by
intro x hx n
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_restrict _ hs, Set.indicator_of_mem hx]
have hg_zero : ∀ x ∉ s, ∀ n, g_seq_s n x = 0 := by
intro x hx n
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_restrict _ hs, Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine ⟨g_seq_s, fun x => ?_, hg_zero⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simp_rw [hg_eq x hx]
exact hf.tendsto_approx x
· simp_rw [hg_zero x hx, hf_zero x hx]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
/-- If the restriction to a set `s` of a σ-algebra `m` is included in the restriction to `s` of
another σ-algebra `m₂` (hypothesis `hs`), the set `s` is `m` measurable and a function `f` supported
on `s` is `m`-strongly-measurable, then `f` is also `m₂`-strongly-measurable. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_measurableSpace_le_on {α E} {m m₂ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace E] [Zero E] {s : Set α} {f : α → E} (hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hs : ∀ t, MeasurableSet[m] (s ∩ t) → MeasurableSet[m₂] (s ∩ t))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hf_zero : ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 0) :
StronglyMeasurable[m₂] f := by
have hs_m₂ : MeasurableSet[m₂] s := by
rw [← Set.inter_univ s]
refine hs Set.univ ?_
rwa [Set.inter_univ]
obtain ⟨g_seq_s, hg_seq_tendsto, hg_seq_zero⟩ := stronglyMeasurable_in_set hs_m hf hf_zero
let g_seq_s₂ : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m₂ E := fun n =>
{ toFun := g_seq_s n
measurableSet_fiber' := fun x => by
rw [← Set.inter_univ (g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x}), ← Set.union_compl_self s,
Set.inter_union_distrib_left, Set.inter_comm (g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x})]
refine MeasurableSet.union (hs _ (hs_m.inter ?_)) ?_
· exact @SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber _ _ m _ _
by_cases hx : x = 0
· suffices g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x} ∩ sᶜ = sᶜ by
rw [this]
exact hs_m₂.compl
ext1 y
rw [hx, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => ⟨hg_seq_zero y h n, h⟩⟩
· suffices g_seq_s n ⁻¹' {x} ∩ sᶜ = ∅ by
rw [this]
exact MeasurableSet.empty
ext1 y
simp only [mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_compl_iff,
mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and, not_not_mem]
refine Function.mtr fun hys => ?_
rw [hg_seq_zero y hys n]
exact Ne.symm hx
finite_range' := @SimpleFunc.finite_range _ _ m (g_seq_s n) }
exact ⟨g_seq_s₂, hg_seq_tendsto⟩
/-- If a function `f` is strongly measurable w.r.t. a sub-σ-algebra `m` and the measure is σ-finite
on `m`, then there exists spanning measurable sets with finite measure on which `f` has bounded
norm. In particular, `f` is integrable on each of those sets. -/
theorem exists_spanning_measurableSet_norm_le [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
∃ s : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet[m] (s n) ∧ μ (s n) < ∞ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s n, ‖f x‖ ≤ n) ∧
⋃ i, s i = Set.univ := by
obtain ⟨s, hs, hs_univ⟩ :=
@exists_spanning_measurableSet_le _ m _ hf.nnnorm.measurable (μ.trim hm) _
refine ⟨s, fun n ↦ ⟨(hs n).1, (le_trim hm).trans_lt (hs n).2.1, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩, hs_univ⟩
have hx_nnnorm : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ n := (hs n).2.2 x hx
rw [← coe_nnnorm]
norm_cast
end StronglyMeasurable
/-! ## Finitely strongly measurable functions -/
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_zero {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [Zero β]
[TopologicalSpace β] : FinStronglyMeasurable (0 : α → β) μ :=
⟨0, by
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_zero, support_zero', measure_empty,
zero_lt_top, forall_const],
fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
namespace FinStronglyMeasurable
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → β}
section sequence
variable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that `∀ x, Tendsto (fun n ↦ hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`
and `∀ n, μ (support (hf.approx n)) < ∞`. These properties are given by
`FinStronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx` and `FinStronglyMeasurable.fin_support_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx : ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem fin_support_approx : ∀ n, μ (support (hf.approx n)) < ∞ :=
hf.choose_spec.1
protected theorem tendsto_approx : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec.2
end sequence
/-- A finitely strongly measurable function is strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨hf.approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
theorem exists_set_sigmaFinite [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β]
(hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ (∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) ∧ SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := by
rcases hf with ⟨fs, hT_lt_top, h_approx⟩
let T n := support (fs n)
have hT_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (T n) := fun n => SimpleFunc.measurableSet_support (fs n)
let t := ⋃ n, T n
refine ⟨t, MeasurableSet.iUnion hT_meas, ?_, ?_⟩
· have h_fs_zero : ∀ n, ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists] at hxt
simpa [T] using hxt n
refine fun x hxt => tendsto_nhds_unique (h_approx x) ?_
rw [funext fun n => h_fs_zero n x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
· refine ⟨⟨⟨fun n => tᶜ ∪ T n, fun _ => trivial, fun n => ?_, ?_⟩⟩⟩
· rw [Measure.restrict_apply' (MeasurableSet.iUnion hT_meas), Set.union_inter_distrib_right,
Set.compl_inter_self t, Set.empty_union]
exact (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt (hT_lt_top n)
· rw [← Set.union_iUnion tᶜ T]
exact Set.compl_union_self _
/-- A finitely strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
protected theorem measurable [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) : Measurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable.measurable
section Arithmetic
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem mul [MulZeroClass β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f * g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
intro n
exact (measure_mono (support_mul_subset_left _ _)).trans_lt (hf.fin_support_approx n)
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem add [AddZeroClass β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f + g) μ :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n + hg.approx n, fun n =>
(measure_mono (Function.support_add _ _)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩)),
fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).add (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem neg [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousNeg β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
FinStronglyMeasurable (-f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun n => -hf.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).neg⟩
suffices μ (Function.support fun x => -(hf.approx n) x) < ∞ by convert this
rw [Function.support_neg (hf.approx n)]
exact hf.fin_support_approx n
@[measurability]
protected theorem sub [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousSub β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f - g) μ :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n - hg.approx n, fun n =>
(measure_mono (Function.support_sub _ _)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩)),
fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).sub (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[measurability]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [Zero β]
[SMulZeroClass 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
FinStronglyMeasurable (c • f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
rw [SimpleFunc.coe_smul]
exact (measure_mono (support_const_smul_subset c _)).trans_lt (hf.fin_support_approx n)
end Arithmetic
section Order
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [SemilatticeSup β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
refine (measure_mono (support_sup _ _)).trans_lt ?_
exact measure_union_lt_top_iff.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [SemilatticeInf β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : FinStronglyMeasurable g μ) : FinStronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) μ := by
refine
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun n => ?_, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
refine (measure_mono (support_inf _ _)).trans_lt ?_
exact measure_union_lt_top_iff.mpr ⟨hf.fin_support_approx n, hg.fin_support_approx n⟩
end Order
end FinStronglyMeasurable
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_iff_stronglyMeasurable_and_exists_set_sigmaFinite {α β} {f : α → β}
[TopologicalSpace β] [T2Space β] [Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔
StronglyMeasurable f ∧
∃ t, MeasurableSet t ∧ (∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) ∧ SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.stronglyMeasurable, hf.exists_set_sigmaFinite⟩, fun hf =>
hf.1.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite hf.2.choose_spec.1 hf.2.choose_spec.2.1
hf.2.choose_spec.2.2⟩
section SecondCountableTopology
variable {G : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
[SecondCountableTopology G] {f : α → G}
/-- In a space with second countable topology and a sigma-finite measure, `FinStronglyMeasurable`
and `Measurable` are equivalent. -/
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => (Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h).finStronglyMeasurable μ⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology and a sigma-finite measure, a measurable function
is `FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_measurable {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
[SigmaFinite μ] (hf : Measurable f) : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
(finStronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable μ).mpr hf
end SecondCountableTopology
theorem measurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_measurable {α β ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MetrizableSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OpensMeasurableSpace ι]
{mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {u : ι → α → β} (hu_cont : ∀ x, Continuous fun i => u i x)
(h : ∀ i, Measurable (u i)) : Measurable (Function.uncurry u) := by
obtain ⟨t_sf, ht_sf⟩ :
∃ t : ℕ → SimpleFunc ι ι, ∀ j x, Tendsto (fun n => u (t n j) x) atTop (𝓝 <| u j x) := by
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable (id : ι → ι) := stronglyMeasurable_id
refine ⟨h_str_meas.approx, fun j x => ?_⟩
exact ((hu_cont x).tendsto j).comp (h_str_meas.tendsto_approx j)
let U (n : ℕ) (p : ι × α) := u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd
have h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 fun p => u p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
exact fun p => ht_sf p.fst p.snd
refine measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto
have h_meas : Measurable fun p : (t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd := by
have :
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : α × (t_sf n).range => u (↑p.snd) p.fst) ∘ Prod.swap :=
rfl
rw [this, @measurable_swap_iff α (↥(t_sf n).range) β m]
exact measurable_from_prod_countable fun j => h j
have :
(fun p : ι × α => u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u p.fst p.snd) ∘ fun p : ι × α =>
(⟨t_sf n p.fst, SimpleFunc.mem_range_self _ _⟩, p.snd) :=
rfl
simp_rw [U, this]
refine h_meas.comp (Measurable.prodMk ?_ measurable_snd)
exact ((t_sf n).measurable.comp measurable_fst).subtype_mk
theorem stronglyMeasurable_uncurry_of_continuous_of_stronglyMeasurable {α β ι : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace ι] [MetrizableSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OpensMeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace α]
{u : ι → α → β} (hu_cont : ∀ x, Continuous fun i => u i x) (h : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (u i)) :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.uncurry u) := by
borelize β
obtain ⟨t_sf, ht_sf⟩ :
∃ t : ℕ → SimpleFunc ι ι, ∀ j x, Tendsto (fun n => u (t n j) x) atTop (𝓝 <| u j x) := by
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable (id : ι → ι) := stronglyMeasurable_id
refine ⟨h_str_meas.approx, fun j x => ?_⟩
exact ((hu_cont x).tendsto j).comp (h_str_meas.tendsto_approx j)
let U (n : ℕ) (p : ι × α) := u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd
have h_tendsto : Tendsto U atTop (𝓝 fun p => u p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
exact fun p => ht_sf p.fst p.snd
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto
have h_str_meas : StronglyMeasurable fun p : (t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd := by
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· have :
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : α × (t_sf n).range => u (↑p.snd) p.fst) ∘ Prod.swap :=
rfl
rw [this, measurable_swap_iff]
exact measurable_from_prod_countable fun j => (h j).measurable
· have : IsSeparable (⋃ i : (t_sf n).range, range (u i)) :=
.iUnion fun i => (h i).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨⟨i, x⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_range]
exact ⟨i, x, rfl⟩
have :
(fun p : ι × α => u (t_sf n p.fst) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(t_sf n).range × α => u p.fst p.snd) ∘ fun p : ι × α =>
(⟨t_sf n p.fst, SimpleFunc.mem_range_self _ _⟩, p.snd) :=
rfl
simp_rw [U, this]
refine h_str_meas.comp_measurable (Measurable.prodMk ?_ measurable_snd)
exact ((t_sf n).measurable.comp measurable_fst).subtype_mk
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 1,676 | 1,683 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
open Classical in
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hf, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_right_inj₀]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
have hfg := mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg
simp only [hfg, hf, hg, dite_false]
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _ |>.not
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q := by
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· simp [norm]
· simp [norm, not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq]
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hfg _ hpn
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases lt_or_le (padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg))) (padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
| inl hlt =>
exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
| inr hle =>
apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hle h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
exact if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦
hf <| equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
let i := max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg)
have hpf : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
have hpg : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) = padicNorm p (g i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
theorem norm_neg (a : PadicSeq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq <| by simp
theorem norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm := by
have : LimZero (f + g - 0) := h
have : f ≈ -g := show LimZero (f - -g) by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
have : f.norm = (-g).norm := norm_equiv this
simpa only [norm_neg] using this
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0 := mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : f + g ≈ g := show LimZero (f + g - g) by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (g - 0) := hg
have : f + g ≈ f := show LimZero (f + g - f) by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)]
else by
unfold norm at hfgne ⊢; split_ifs at hfgne ⊢
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at hfgne ⊢`
rw [lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg] at hfgne
· rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
exact padicNorm.add_eq_max_of_ne hfgne
end Embedding
end PadicSeq
/-- The `p`-adic numbers `ℚ_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
-/
def Padic (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (padicNorm p)
/-- notation for p-padic rationals -/
notation "ℚ_[" p "]" => Padic p
namespace Padic
section Completion
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance field : Field ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.field
instance : Inhabited ℚ_[p] :=
⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : CommRing ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.commRing
instance : Ring ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.ring
instance : Zero ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : One ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Add ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Mul ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Sub ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Neg ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : Div ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : PadicSeq p → ℚ_[p] :=
Quotient.mk'
variable (p)
theorem zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
theorem mk_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padicNorm p) q ≈ const (padicNorm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨fun heq ↦ eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| const_limZero.1 heq, fun heq ↦ by
rw [heq]⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ Quotient.eq'.1, fun h ↦ by rw [h]⟩
instance : CharZero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun m n ↦ by
rw [← Rat.cast_natCast]
norm_cast
exact id⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y :=
Rat.cast_add _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x :=
Rat.cast_neg _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y :=
Rat.cast_mul _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y :=
Rat.cast_sub _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y :=
Rat.cast_div _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : (↑(1 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : (↑(0 : ℚ) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
end Completion
end Padic
/-- The rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]` is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `‖ ‖`. -/
def padicNormE {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] : AbsoluteValue ℚ_[p] ℚ where
toFun := Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _
map_mul' q r := Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_mul
nonneg' q := Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
eq_zero' q := Quotient.inductionOn q fun r ↦ by
rw [Padic.zero_def, Quotient.eq]
exact PadicSeq.norm_zero_iff r
add_le' q r := by
trans
max ((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) q)
((Quotient.lift PadicSeq.norm <| @PadicSeq.norm_equiv _ _) r)
· exact Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonarchimedean
refine max_le_add_of_nonneg (Quotient.inductionOn q <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg) ?_
exact Quotient.inductionOn r <| PadicSeq.norm_nonneg
namespace padicNormE
section Embedding
open PadicSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem defn (f : PadicSeq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (Padic.mk f - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- `change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε` also works, but is very slow
suffices hyp : ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε by peel hyp with N; use N
by_contra! h
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := cauchy₂ f hε
rcases h N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩
have hne : ¬f - const (padicNorm p) (f i) ≈ 0 := fun h ↦ by
rw [PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos h] at hge
exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε
unfold PadicSeq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge
cases _root_.le_total N (stationaryPoint hne) with
| inl hgen =>
exact hN _ hgen _ hi
| inr hngen =>
have := stationaryPoint_spec hne le_rfl hngen
rw [← this]
exact hN _ le_rfl _ hi
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) ≤ max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r <| norm_nonarchimedean
/-- Theorems about `padicNormE` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`‖ ‖`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padicNormE q ≠ padicNormE r → padicNormE (q + r : ℚ_[p]) = max (padicNormE q) (padicNormE r) :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ q r fun _ _ ↦ PadicSeq.add_eq_max_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padicNormE (q : ℚ_[p]) = padicNorm p q :=
norm_const _
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padicNormE q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-n) :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun f hf ↦
have : ¬f ≈ 0 := (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf
norm_values_discrete f this
end Embedding
end padicNormE
namespace Padic
section Complete
open PadicSeq Padic
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (f : CauSeq _ (@padicNormE p _))
theorem rat_dense' (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ r : ℚ, padicNormE (q - r : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
Quotient.inductionOn q fun q' ↦
have : ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ N, ∀ n ≥ N, padicNorm p (q' m - q' n) < ε := cauchy₂ _ hε
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this
⟨q' N, by
classical
dsimp [padicNormE]
-- Porting note: this used to be `change`, but that times out.
convert_to PadicSeq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N)) < ε
rcases Decidable.em (q' - const (padicNorm p) (q' N) ≈ 0) with heq | hne'
· simpa only [heq, PadicSeq.norm, dif_pos]
· simp only [PadicSeq.norm, dif_neg hne']
change padicNorm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε
rcases Decidable.em (stationaryPoint hne' ≤ N) with hle | hle
· have := (stationaryPoint_spec hne' le_rfl hle).symm
simp only [const_apply, sub_apply, padicNorm.zero, sub_self] at this
simpa only [this]
· exact hN _ (lt_of_not_ge hle).le _ le_rfl⟩
private theorem div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < 1 / (n + 1 : ℚ) :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (mod_cast succ_pos _)
/-- `limSeq f`, for `f` a Cauchy sequence of `p`-adic numbers, is a sequence of rationals with the
same limit point as `f`. -/
def limSeq : ℕ → ℚ :=
fun n ↦ Classical.choose (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - (limSeq f i : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
refine (exists_nat_gt (1 / ε)).imp fun N hN i hi ↦ ?_
have h := Classical.choose_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i))
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h ((div_le_iff₀' <| mod_cast succ_pos _).mpr ?_)
rw [right_distrib]
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg
· exact (div_le_iff₀ hε).mp (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (mod_cast hi))
· apply le_of_lt
simpa
theorem exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) (limSeq f) := fun ε hε ↦ by
have hε3 : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3
exists max N N2
intro j hj
suffices
padicNormE (limSeq f j - f (max N N2) + (f (max N N2) - limSeq f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε by
ring_nf at this ⊢
rw [← padicNormE.eq_padic_norm']
exact mod_cast this
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· rw [← add_thirds ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· suffices padicNormE (limSeq f j - f j + (f j - f (max N N2)) : ℚ_[p]) < ε / 3 + ε / 3 by
simpa only [sub_add_sub_cancel]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt
· apply padicNormE.add_le
· apply _root_.add_lt_add
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
apply mod_cast hN j
exact le_of_max_le_left hj
· exact hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hj) _ (le_max_right _ _)
· apply mod_cast hN (max N N2)
apply le_max_left
private def lim' : PadicSeq p :=
⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] :=
⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (q - f i : ℚ_[p]) < ε :=
⟨lim f, fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (half_pos hε)
obtain ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padicNormE.defn (lim' f) (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨max N N2, fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel _ (lim' f i : ℚ_[p]) _]
refine (padicNormE.add_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
apply _root_.add_lt_add
· apply hN2 _ (le_of_max_le_right hi)
· rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN _ (le_of_max_le_left hi)⟩
theorem complete'' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padicNormE (f i - q : ℚ_[p]) < ε := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := complete' f
refine ⟨x, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hx ε hε
refine ⟨N, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [padicNormE.map_sub]
exact hN i hi
end Complete
section NormedSpace
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
|
instance : Dist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y ↦ padicNormE (x - y : ℚ_[p])⟩
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x y z ↦ by simpa [dist] using padicNormE.nonarchimedean' (x - y) (y - z)⟩
instance metricSpace : MetricSpace ℚ_[p] where
dist_self := by simp [dist]
dist := dist
dist_comm x y := by simp [dist, ← padicNormE.map_neg (x - y : ℚ_[p])]
dist_triangle x y z := by
dsimp [dist]
exact mod_cast padicNormE.sub_le x y z
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by
dsimp [dist]; intro _ _ h
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
apply padicNormE.eq_zero.1
exact mod_cast h
instance : Norm ℚ_[p] :=
⟨fun x ↦ padicNormE x⟩
instance normedField : NormedField ℚ_[p] :=
{ Padic.field,
Padic.metricSpace p with
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 700 | 725 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 2,037 | 2,040 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ']
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
theorem card_image₂_iff :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(image₂ f s t) = #s * #t :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
@[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
| @[gcongr]
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 73 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Hom.ContinuousEval
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
/-!
# The compact-open topology
In this file, we define the compact-open topology on the set of continuous maps between two
topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMap.compactOpen` is the compact-open topology on `C(X, Y)`.
It is declared as an instance.
* `ContinuousMap.coev` is the coevaluation map `Y → C(X, Y × X)`. It is always continuous.
* `ContinuousMap.curry` is the currying map `C(X × Y, Z) → C(X, C(Y, Z))`. This map always exists
and it is continuous as long as `X × Y` is locally compact.
* `ContinuousMap.uncurry` is the uncurrying map `C(X, C(Y, Z)) → C(X × Y, Z)`. For this map to
exist, we need `Y` to be locally compact. If `X` is also locally compact, then this map is
continuous.
* `Homeomorph.curry` combines the currying and uncurrying operations into a homeomorphism
`C(X × Y, Z) ≃ₜ C(X, C(Y, Z))`. This homeomorphism exists if `X` and `Y` are locally compact.
## Tags
compact-open, curry, function space
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology
namespace ContinuousMap
section CompactOpen
variable {α X Y Z T : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace T]
variable {K : Set X} {U : Set Y}
/-- The compact-open topology on the space of continuous maps `C(X, Y)`. -/
instance compactOpen : TopologicalSpace C(X, Y) :=
.generateFrom <| image2 (fun K U ↦ {f | MapsTo f K U}) {K | IsCompact K} {U | IsOpen U}
/-- Definition of `ContinuousMap.compactOpen`. -/
theorem compactOpen_eq : @compactOpen X Y _ _ =
.generateFrom (image2 (fun K U ↦ {f | MapsTo f K U}) {K | IsCompact K} {t | IsOpen t}) :=
rfl
theorem isOpen_setOf_mapsTo (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) :
IsOpen {f : C(X, Y) | MapsTo f K U} :=
isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem <| mem_image2_of_mem hK hU
lemma eventually_mapsTo {f : C(X, Y)} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U) (h : MapsTo f K U) :
∀ᶠ g : C(X, Y) in 𝓝 f, MapsTo g K U :=
(isOpen_setOf_mapsTo hK hU).mem_nhds h
lemma nhds_compactOpen (f : C(X, Y)) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ (K : Set X) (_ : IsCompact K) (U : Set Y) (_ : IsOpen U) (_ : MapsTo f K U),
𝓟 {g : C(X, Y) | MapsTo g K U} := by
simp_rw [compactOpen_eq, nhds_generateFrom, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (f ∈ _), iInf_and,
← image_prod, iInf_image, biInf_prod, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendsto_nhds_compactOpen {l : Filter α} {f : α → C(Y, Z)} {g : C(Y, Z)} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 g) ↔
∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → MapsTo g K U → ∀ᶠ a in l, MapsTo (f a) K U := by
simp [nhds_compactOpen]
|
lemma continuous_compactOpen {f : X → C(Y, Z)} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ K, IsCompact K → ∀ U, IsOpen U → IsOpen {x | MapsTo (f x) K U} :=
continuous_generateFrom_iff.trans forall_mem_image2
| Mathlib/Topology/CompactOpen.lean | 73 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials over a ring
Many results about polynomials hold when the coefficient ring is a commutative semiring.
Some stronger results can be derived when we assume this semiring is a ring.
This file does not define any new operations, but proves some of these stronger results.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommRing R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
instance instCommRingMvPolynomial : CommRing (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commRing
variable (σ a a')
@[simp]
theorem C_sub : (C (a - a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a - C a' :=
RingHom.map_sub _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_neg : (C (-a) : MvPolynomial σ R) = -C a :=
RingHom.map_neg _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_neg (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (-p) = -coeff m p :=
Finsupp.neg_apply _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sub (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p - q) = coeff m p - coeff m q :=
Finsupp.sub_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem support_neg : (-p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_neg p
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p - q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_sub
variable {σ} (p)
section Degrees
@[simp]
theorem degrees_neg (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (-p).degrees = p.degrees := by
rw [degrees, support_neg]; rfl
theorem degrees_sub_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p - q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ∪ q.degrees := by
simpa [degrees_def] using AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_sub_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sub := degrees_sub_le
end Degrees
section Degrees
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_neg (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : degreeOf i (-p) = degreeOf i p := by
rw [degreeOf, degreeOf, degrees_neg]
theorem degreeOf_sub_le (i : σ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (p - q) ≤ max (degreeOf i p) (degreeOf i q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, degreeOf_neg] using degreeOf_add_le i p (-q)
end Degrees
section Vars
@[simp]
theorem vars_neg : (-p).vars = p.vars := by simp [vars, degrees_neg]
theorem vars_sub_subset [DecidableEq σ] : (p - q).vars ⊆ p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
convert vars_add_subset p (-q) using 2 <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem vars_sub_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (hpq : Disjoint p.vars q.vars) :
(p - q).vars = p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
rw [← vars_neg q] at hpq
convert vars_add_of_disjoint hpq using 2 <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
end Vars
section Eval
variable [CommRing S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → S)
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_sub : (p - q).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f g - q.eval₂ f g :=
(eval₂Hom f g).map_sub _ _
theorem eval_sub (f : σ → R) : eval f (p - q) = eval f p - eval f q :=
eval₂_sub _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_neg : (-p).eval₂ f g = -p.eval₂ f g :=
(eval₂Hom f g).map_neg _
theorem eval_neg (f : σ → R) : eval f (-p) = -eval f p :=
eval₂_neg _ _ _
theorem hom_C (f : MvPolynomial σ ℤ →+* S) (n : ℤ) : f (C n) = (n : S) :=
eq_intCast (f.comp C) n
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : Z[X_1, X_2, ...] → R`
is determined by the evaluations `f(X_1)`, `f(X_2)`, ... -/
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_X {R : Type u} (c : ℤ →+* S) (f : MvPolynomial R ℤ →+* S) (x : MvPolynomial R ℤ) :
eval₂ c (f ∘ X) x = f x := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on x
(fun n => by
rw [hom_C f, eval₂_C]
exact eq_intCast c n)
(fun p q hp hq => by
rw [eval₂_add, hp, hq]
exact (f.map_add _ _).symm)
(fun p n hp => by
rw [eval₂_mul, eval₂_X, hp]
exact (f.map_mul _ _).symm)
/-- Ring homomorphisms out of integer polynomials on a type `σ` are the same as
functions out of the type `σ`. -/
def homEquiv : (MvPolynomial σ ℤ →+* S) ≃ (σ → S) where
toFun f := f ∘ X
invFun f := eval₂Hom (Int.castRingHom S) f
left_inv _ := RingHom.ext <| eval₂Hom_X _ _
right_inv f := funext fun x => by simp only [coe_eval₂Hom, Function.comp_apply, eval₂_X]
end Eval
section DegreeOf
theorem degreeOf_sub_lt {x : σ} {f g : MvPolynomial σ R} {k : ℕ} (h : 0 < k)
(hf : ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ f.support → k ≤ m x → coeff m f = coeff m g)
(hg : ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ g.support → k ≤ m x → coeff m f = coeff m g) :
degreeOf x (f - g) < k := by
classical
rw [degreeOf_lt_iff h]
intro m hm
by_contra! hc
have h := support_sub σ f g hm
simp only [mem_support_iff, Ne, coeff_sub, sub_eq_zero] at hm
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 h with cf | cg
· exact hm (hf m cf hc)
· exact hm (hg m cg hc)
end DegreeOf
section TotalDegree
@[simp]
theorem totalDegree_neg (a : MvPolynomial σ R) : (-a).totalDegree = a.totalDegree := by
simp only [totalDegree, support_neg]
theorem totalDegree_sub (a b : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(a - b).totalDegree ≤ max a.totalDegree b.totalDegree :=
calc
(a - b).totalDegree = (a + -b).totalDegree := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max a.totalDegree (-b).totalDegree := totalDegree_add a (-b)
_ = max a.totalDegree b.totalDegree := by rw [totalDegree_neg]
theorem totalDegree_sub_C_le (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (r : R) :
totalDegree (p - C r) ≤ totalDegree p :=
(totalDegree_sub _ _).trans_eq <| by rw [totalDegree_C, Nat.max_zero]
end TotalDegree
end CommRing
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/CommRing.lean | 215 | 217 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
/-!
# Order topology on a densely ordered set
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
section DenselyOrdered
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
{s : Set α}
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`, unless `a` is a top
element. -/
theorem closure_Ioi' {a : α} (h : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioi_subset_Ici_self isClosed_Ici
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Ici_diff_Ioi_same, singleton_subset_iff]
exact isGLB_Ioi.mem_closure h
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioi (a : α) [NoMaxOrder α] : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
closure_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the closed interval `(-∞, a]`, unless `a` is a bottom
element. -/
theorem closure_Iio' (h : (Iio a).Nonempty) : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Ioi' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the interval `(-∞, a]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iio (a : α) [NoMinOrder α] : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Iio' nonempty_Iio
/-- The closure of the open interval `(a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioo a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· rcases hab.lt_or_lt with hab | hab
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Icc_diff_Ioo_same hab.le]
have hab' : (Ioo a b).Nonempty := nonempty_Ioo.2 hab
simp only [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨(isGLB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab', (isLUB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab'⟩
· rw [Icc_eq_empty_of_lt hab]
exact empty_subset _
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, b]` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioc_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
/-- The closure of the interval `[a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ico_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a := by
rw [← compl_Iio, interior_compl, closure_Iio' ha, compl_Iic]
theorem interior_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a :=
interior_Ici' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem interior_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Ici' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem interior_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem interior_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Icc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} :
Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Icc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ico a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iio, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ico, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ioc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ioi, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ioc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
theorem closure_interior_Icc {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : closure (interior (Icc a b)) = Icc a b :=
(closure_minimal interior_subset isClosed_Icc).antisymm <|
calc
Icc a b = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Icc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isOpen_Ioo)
theorem Ioc_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with (rfl | h)
· simp
· calc
Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := Ioc_subset_Icc_self
_ = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Ioc_self isOpen_Ioo)
theorem Ico_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ico a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ico a b)) := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using
Ioc_subset_closure_interior (OrderDual.toDual b) (OrderDual.toDual a)
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ici a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
theorem frontier_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ici a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ici' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iic a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
theorem frontier_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iic a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioi' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Ioi' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
theorem frontier_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iio' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iio a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Iio' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
theorem frontier_Iio [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iio a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iio' nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
frontier (Icc a b) = {a, b} := by simp [frontier, h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioo {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioo a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioo h.ne, interior_Ioo, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ico a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ico h.ne, interior_Ico, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioc a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioc h.ne, interior_Ioc, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' {a b : α} (H₁ : (Ioi a).Nonempty) (H₂ : a ≤ b) :
NeBot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| by rwa [closure_Ioi' H₁]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioi a] b) :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' nonempty_Ioi H
theorem nhdsGT_neBot_of_exists_gt {a : α} (H : ∃ b, a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot' H (le_refl a)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' := nhdsGT_neBot_of_exists_gt
instance nhdsGT_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) := nhdsWithin_Ioi_neBot le_rfl
@[deprecated nhdsGT_neBot (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[>] a) := nhdsGT_neBot a
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' {b c : α} (H₁ : (Iio c).Nonempty) (H₂ : b ≤ c) :
NeBot (𝓝[Iio c] b) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| by rwa [closure_Iio' H₁]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) : NeBot (𝓝[Iio b] a) :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' nonempty_Iio H
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' {b : α} (H : (Iio b).Nonempty) : NeBot (𝓝[<] b) :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot' H (le_refl b)
instance nhdsLT_neBot [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[<] a) := nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot (le_refl a)
@[deprecated nhdsLT_neBot (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : NeBot (𝓝[<] a) := nhdsLT_neBot a
theorem right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ico a b] b) :=
(isLUB_Ico H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ico.2 H)
theorem left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioc a b] a) :=
(isGLB_Ioc H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioc.2 H)
theorem left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioo a b] a) :=
(isGLB_Ioo H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioo.2 H)
theorem right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot {a b : α} (H : a < b) : NeBot (𝓝[Ioo a b] b) :=
(isLUB_Ioo H).nhdsWithin_neBot (nonempty_Ioo.2 H)
theorem comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset (hb : s ⊆ Iio b) (hs : s.Nonempty → ∃ a < b, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[<] b) = atTop := by
nontriviality
haveI : Nonempty s := nontrivial_iff_nonempty.1 ‹_›
rcases hs (nonempty_subtype.1 ‹_›) with ⟨a, h, hs⟩
ext u; constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
obtain ⟨x, ⟨hxa : a ≤ x, hxb : x < b⟩, hxt : Ioo x b ⊆ t⟩ :=
(mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset h).mp ht
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyb⟩ := exists_between hxb
refine mem_of_superset (mem_atTop ⟨y, hs ⟨hxa.trans_lt hxy, hyb⟩⟩) ?_
rintro ⟨z, hzs⟩ (hyz : y ≤ z)
exact hts (hxt ⟨hxy.trans_le hyz, hb hzs⟩)
· intro hu
obtain ⟨x : s, hx : ∀ z, x ≤ z → z ∈ u⟩ := mem_atTop_sets.1 hu
exact ⟨Ioo x b, Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (hb x.2), fun z hz => hx _ hz.1.le⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_nhdsWithin_Iio_of_Ioo_subset := comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset
theorem comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset (ha : s ⊆ Ioi a) (hs : s.Nonempty → ∃ b > a, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot := by
apply comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ⊆ Iio (toDual a) from ha)
simp only [OrderDual.exists, Ioo_toDual]
exact hs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_nhdsWithin_Ioi_of_Ioo_subset := comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset
theorem map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset (hb : s ⊆ Iio b) (hs : ∀ a' < b, ∃ a < b, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] b := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty (Iio b) with (hb' | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· have : IsEmpty s := ⟨fun x => hb'.subset (hb x.2)⟩
rw [filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty atTop, Filter.map_bot, hb', nhdsWithin_empty]
· rw [← comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset hb fun _ => hs a ha, map_comap_of_mem]
rw [Subtype.range_val]
exact (mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' ha).2 (hs a ha)
theorem map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset (ha : s ⊆ Ioi a) (hs : ∀ b' > a, ∃ b > a, Ioo a b ⊆ s) :
map ((↑) : s → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a := by
-- the elaborator gets stuck without `(... :)`
refine (map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset (show ofDual ⁻¹' s ⊆ Iio (toDual a) from ha)
fun b' hb' => ?_ :)
simpa using hs b' hb'
/-- The `atTop` filter for an open interval `Ioo a b` comes from the left-neighbourhoods filter at
the right endpoint in the ambient order. -/
theorem comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT (a b : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) (𝓝[<] b) = atTop :=
comap_coe_nhdsLT_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self fun h => ⟨a, nonempty_Ioo.1 h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsWithin_Iio := comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT
/-- The `atBot` filter for an open interval `Ioo a b` comes from the right-neighbourhoods filter at
the left endpoint in the ambient order. -/
theorem comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT (a b : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot :=
comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Ioi_self fun h => ⟨b, nonempty_Ioo.1 h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsWithin_Ioi := comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT
theorem comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT (a : α) : comap ((↑) : Ioi a → α) (𝓝[>] a) = atBot :=
comap_coe_nhdsGT_of_Ioo_subset (Subset.refl _) fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x, hx, Ioo_subset_Ioi_self⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsWithin_Ioi := comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT
theorem comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT (a : α) : comap ((↑) : Iio a → α) (𝓝[<] a) = atTop :=
comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT (α := αᵒᵈ) a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_coe_Iio_nhdsWithin_Iio := comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Ioo_atTop {a b : α} (h : a < b) : map ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] b :=
map_coe_atTop_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self fun _ _ => ⟨_, h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Ioo_atBot {a b : α} (h : a < b) : map ((↑) : Ioo a b → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a :=
map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset Ioo_subset_Ioi_self fun _ _ => ⟨_, h, Subset.refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Ioi_atBot (a : α) : map ((↑) : Ioi a → α) atBot = 𝓝[>] a :=
map_coe_atBot_of_Ioo_subset (Subset.refl _) fun b hb => ⟨b, hb, Ioo_subset_Ioi_self⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_Iio_atTop (a : α) : map ((↑) : Iio a → α) atTop = 𝓝[<] a :=
map_coe_Ioi_atBot (α := αᵒᵈ) _
variable {l : Filter β} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop (h : a < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : Ioo a b => f x) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioo_atTop h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot (h : a < b) :
Tendsto (fun x : Ioo a b => f x) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioo_atBot h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Ioi_atBot :
Tendsto (fun x : Ioi a => f x) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_comp_coe_Iio_atTop :
Tendsto (fun x : Iio a => f x) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) l := by
rw [← map_coe_Iio_atTop, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Ioo_atTop {f : β → Ioo a b} :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[<] b) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsLT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Ioo_atBot {f : β → Ioo a b} :
Tendsto f l atBot ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[>] a) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioo_nhdsGT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Ioi_atBot {f : β → Ioi a} :
Tendsto f l atBot ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[>] a) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_Iio_atTop {f : β → Iio a} :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : α)) l (𝓝[<] a) := by
rw [← comap_coe_Iio_nhdsLT, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
instance (x : α) [Nontrivial α] : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) := by
refine forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => ?_
obtain ⟨u, u_open, xu, us⟩ : ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ {x}ᶜ ⊆ s := mem_nhdsWithin.1 hs
obtain ⟨a, b, a_lt_b, hab⟩ : ∃ a b : α, a < b ∧ Ioo a b ⊆ u := u_open.exists_Ioo_subset ⟨x, xu⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ y, a < y ∧ y < b := exists_between a_lt_b
rcases ne_or_eq x y with (xy | rfl)
· exact ⟨y, us ⟨hab hy, xy.symm⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : ∃ z, a < z ∧ z < x := exists_between hy.1
exact ⟨z, us ⟨hab ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hy.2⟩, hz.2.ne⟩⟩
/-- Let `s` be a dense set in a nontrivial dense linear order `α`. If `s` is a
separable space (e.g., if `α` has a second countable topology), then there exists a countable
dense subset `t ⊆ s` such that `t` does not contain bottom/top elements of `α`. -/
theorem Dense.exists_countable_dense_subset_no_bot_top [Nontrivial α] {s : Set α} [SeparableSpace s]
(hs : Dense s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ Dense t ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∉ t) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∉ t := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, htd⟩
refine ⟨t \ ({ x | IsBot x } ∪ { x | IsTop x }), ?_, ?_, ?_, fun x hx => ?_, fun x hx => ?_⟩
· exact diff_subset.trans hts
· exact htc.mono diff_subset
· exact htd.diff_finite ((subsingleton_isBot α).finite.union (subsingleton_isTop α).finite)
· simp [hx]
· simp [hx]
| variable (α) in
/-- If `α` is a nontrivial separable dense linear order, then there exists a
countable dense set `s : Set α` that contains neither top nor bottom elements of `α`.
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/DenselyOrdered.lean | 378 | 380 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
/-!
# Analytic functions
A function is analytic in one dimension around `0` if it can be written as a converging power series
`Σ pₙ zⁿ`. This definition can be extended to any dimension (even in infinite dimension) by
requiring that `pₙ` is a continuous `n`-multilinear map. In general, `pₙ` is not unique (in two
dimensions, taking `p₂ (x, y) (x', y') = x y'` or `y x'` gives the same map when applied to a
vector `(x, y) (x, y)`). A way to guarantee uniqueness is to take a symmetric `pₙ`, but this is not
always possible in nonzero characteristic (in characteristic 2, the previous example has no
symmetric representative). Therefore, we do not insist on symmetry or uniqueness in the definition,
and we only require the existence of a converging series.
The general framework is important to say that the exponential map on bounded operators on a Banach
space is analytic, as well as the inverse on invertible operators.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`.
* `p.radius`: the largest `r : ℝ≥0∞` such that `‖p n‖ * r^n` grows subexponentially.
* `p.le_radius_of_bound`, `p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal`, `p.le_radius_of_isBigO`: if `‖p n‖ * r ^ n`
is bounded above, then `r ≤ p.radius`;
* `p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius`, `p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius`,
`p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius`,
`p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`, `p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`: if `r < p.radius`, then
`‖p n‖ * r ^ n` tends to zero exponentially;
* `p.lt_radius_of_isBigO`: if `r ≠ 0` and `‖p n‖ * r ^ n = O(a ^ n)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then
`r < p.radius`;
* `p.partialSum n x`: the sum `∑_{i = 0}^{n-1} pᵢ xⁱ`.
* `p.sum x`: the sum `∑'_{i = 0}^{∞} pᵢ xⁱ`.
Additionally, let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₙ yⁿ`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`.
* `AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` such that holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We also define versions of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall`, `AnalyticAt`, and `AnalyticOnNhd` restricted to
a set, similar to `ContinuousWithinAt`. See `Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within` for basic properties.
* `AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` means a power series at `x` converges to `f` on `𝓝[s ∪ {x}] x`.
* `AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s t` means `∀ x ∈ t, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function admits a power series, it is continuous (see
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn` and `HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt` and
`AnalyticAt.continuousAt`).
* In a complete space, the sum of a formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the
disk of convergence, see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`.
## Implementation details
We only introduce the radius of convergence of a power series, as `p.radius`.
For a power series in finitely many dimensions, there is a finer (directional, coordinate-dependent)
notion, describing the polydisk of convergence. This notion is more specific, and not necessary to
build the general theory. We do not define it here.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal Set Asymptotics
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.sum x` is the sum `Σ pₙ xⁿ`. A
priori, it only behaves well when `‖x‖ < p.radius`. -/
protected def sum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : F :=
∑' n : ℕ, p n fun _ => x
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.partialSum n x` is the sum
`Σ pₖ xᵏ` for `k ∈ {0,..., n-1}`. -/
def partialSum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) (x : E) : F :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, p k fun _ : Fin k => x
/-- The partial sums of a formal multilinear series are continuous. -/
theorem partialSum_continuous (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (p.partialSum n) := by
unfold partialSum
fun_prop
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### The radius of a formal multilinear series -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
/-- The radius of a formal multilinear series is the largest `r` such that the sum `Σ ‖pₙ‖ ‖y‖ⁿ`
converges for all `‖y‖ < r`. This implies that `Σ pₙ yⁿ` converges for all `‖y‖ < r`, but these
definitions are *not* equivalent in general. -/
def radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0) (C : ℝ) (_ : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C), (r : ℝ≥0∞)
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound (C : ℝ) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
le_iSup_of_le r <| le_iSup_of_le C <| le_iSup (fun _ => (r : ℝ≥0∞)) h
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (C : ℝ≥0) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => mod_cast h n
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(1)`, as `n → ∞`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_isBigO (h : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
Exists.elim (isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff.1 h) fun C hC =>
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (hC n)
theorem le_radius_of_eventually_le (C) (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO <| IsBigO.of_bound C <| h.mono fun n hn => by simpa
theorem le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (∑' n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) fun _ => h.le_tsum' _
theorem le_radius_of_summable (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm <| by
simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at h
exact mod_cast h
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
(h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h r)
theorem radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, p n = 0) : p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO fun r =>
(isBigO_zero _ _).congr' (h.mono fun n hn => by simp [hn]) EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ m, p (m + n) = 0) :
p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero <|
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n, fun _ hk => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hk ▸ hn _⟩
@[simp]
theorem constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius {v : F} :
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius = ⊤ :=
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 1
(by simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries])
/-- `0` has infinite radius of convergence -/
@[simp] lemma zero_radius : (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F).radius = ∞ := by
rw [← constFormalMultilinearSeries_zero]
exact constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1`, `‖p n‖ rⁿ = o(aⁿ)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (a ^ ·) := by
have := (TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4
rw [this]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [(TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4]
simp only [radius, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, C, hC, rt⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at rt
have : 0 < (t : ℝ) := r.coe_nonneg.trans_lt rt
rw [← div_lt_one this] at rt
refine ⟨_, rt, C, Or.inr zero_lt_one, fun n => ?_⟩
calc
|‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n| = ‖p n‖ * (t : ℝ) ^ n * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by
field_simp [mul_right_comm, abs_mul]
_ ≤ C * (r / t : ℝ) ^ n := by gcongr; apply hC
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = o(1)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
(fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (fun _ => 1 : ℕ → ℝ) :=
let ⟨_, ha, hp⟩ := p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h
hp.trans <| (isLittleO_pow_pow_of_lt_left ha.1.le ha.2).congr (fun _ => rfl) one_pow
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1` and `C > 0`, `‖p n‖ * r ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n`. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C * a ^ n := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 5).mp
(p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius h)
rcases this with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, H⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, C, hC, fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (H n)⟩
/-- If `r ≠ 0` and `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(aⁿ)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then `r < p.radius`. -/
theorem lt_radius_of_isBigO (h₀ : r ≠ 0) {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Ioo (-1 : ℝ) 1)
(hp : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] (a ^ ·)) : ↑r < p.radius := by
have := ((TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 2 5)
rcases this.mp ⟨a, ha, hp⟩ with ⟨a, ha, C, hC, hp⟩
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero, ← NNReal.coe_pos] at h₀
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.1.le
have : (r : ℝ) < r / a := by
simpa only [div_one] using (div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left h₀ zero_lt_one ha.1).2 ha.2
norm_cast at this
rw [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at this
refine this.trans_le (p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => ?_)
rw [NNReal.coe_div, div_pow, ← mul_div_assoc, div_le_iff₀ (pow_pos ha.1 n)]
exact (le_abs_self _).trans (hp n)
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨_, ha, C, hC, h⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => (h n).trans <| mul_le_of_le_one_right hC.lt.le (pow_le_one₀ ha.1.le ha.2.le)⟩
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h0 : 0 < r) (h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ C / (r : ℝ) ^ n :=
let ⟨C, hC, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius h
⟨C, hC, fun n => Iff.mpr (le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos h0 _)) (hp n)⟩
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded. -/
theorem nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
(h : (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius) : ∃ C > 0, ∀ n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C :=
let ⟨C, hC, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius h
⟨⟨C, hC.lt.le⟩, hC, mod_cast hp⟩
theorem le_radius_of_tendsto (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {l : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) atTop (𝓝 l)) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h.isBigO_one _)
theorem le_radius_of_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hs : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_tendsto hs.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem not_summable_norm_of_radius_lt_nnnorm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(h : p.radius < ‖x‖₊) : ¬Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * ‖x‖ ^ n :=
fun hs => not_le_of_lt h (p.le_radius_of_summable_norm hs)
theorem summable_norm_mul_pow (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by
obtain ⟨a, ha : a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, C, - : 0 < C, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius h
exact .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg _))
hp ((summable_geometric_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2).mul_left _)
theorem summable_norm_apply (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n fun _ => x‖ := by
rw [mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff] at hx
refine .of_nonneg_of_le
(fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) (fun n ↦ ((p n).le_opNorm _).trans_eq ?_) (p.summable_norm_mul_pow hx)
simp
theorem summable_nnnorm_mul_pow (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
Summable fun n : ℕ => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe]
push_cast
exact p.summable_norm_mul_pow h
protected theorem summable [CompleteSpace F] (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : Summable fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => x :=
(p.summable_norm_apply hx).of_norm
theorem radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(hs : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_summable_norm (hs r)
theorem radius_eq_top_iff_summable_norm (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
p.radius = ∞ ↔ ∀ r : ℝ≥0, Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro h r
obtain ⟨a, ha : a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, C, - : 0 < C, hp⟩ := p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius
(show (r : ℝ≥0∞) < p.radius from h.symm ▸ ENNReal.coe_lt_top)
refine .of_norm_bounded
(fun n ↦ (C : ℝ) * a ^ n) ((summable_geometric_of_lt_one ha.1.le ha.2).mul_left _) fun n ↦ ?_
specialize hp n
rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg r.coe_nonneg n))]
· exact p.radius_eq_top_of_summable_norm
/-- If the radius of `p` is positive, then `‖pₙ‖` grows at most geometrically. -/
theorem le_mul_pow_of_radius_pos (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (h : 0 < p.radius) :
∃ (C r : _) (_ : 0 < C) (_ : 0 < r), ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ C * r ^ n := by
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 h with ⟨r, r0, rlt⟩
have rpos : 0 < (r : ℝ) := by simp [ENNReal.coe_pos.1 r0]
rcases norm_le_div_pow_of_pos_of_lt_radius p rpos rlt with ⟨C, Cpos, hCp⟩
refine ⟨C, r⁻¹, Cpos, by simp only [inv_pos, rpos], fun n => ?_⟩
rw [inv_pow, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hCp n
lemma radius_le_of_le {𝕜' E' F' : Type*}
[NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' E']
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F']
{p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜' E' F'}
(h : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ ≤ ‖q n‖) : q.radius ≤ p.radius := by
apply le_of_forall_nnreal_lt (fun r hr ↦ ?_)
rcases norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius _ hr with ⟨C, -, hC⟩
apply le_radius_of_bound _ C (fun n ↦ ?_)
apply le_trans _ (hC n)
gcongr
exact h n
/-- The radius of the sum of two formal series is at least the minimum of their two radii. -/
theorem min_radius_le_radius_add (p q : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) :
min p.radius q.radius ≤ (p + q).radius := by
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr => ?_
rw [lt_min_iff] at hr
have := ((p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius hr.1).add (q.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius hr.2)).isBigO
refine (p + q).le_radius_of_isBigO ((isBigO_of_le _ fun n => ?_).trans this)
rw [← add_mul, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_norm]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((norm_add_le _ _).trans (le_abs_self _)) (norm_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem radius_neg (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : (-p).radius = p.radius := by
simp only [radius, neg_apply, norm_neg]
theorem radius_le_smul {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {c : 𝕜} : p.radius ≤ (c • p).radius := by
simp only [radius, smul_apply]
refine iSup_mono fun r ↦ iSup_mono' fun C ↦ ⟨‖c‖ * C, iSup_mono' fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [le_refl, exists_prop, and_true]
intro n
rw [norm_smul c (p n), mul_assoc]
gcongr
exact h n
theorem radius_smul_eq (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(c • p).radius = p.radius := by
apply eq_of_le_of_le _ radius_le_smul
exact radius_le_smul.trans_eq (congr_arg _ <| inv_smul_smul₀ hc p)
@[simp]
theorem radius_shift (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : p.shift.radius = p.radius := by
simp only [radius, shift, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ContinuousMultilinearMap.curryRight_norm]
congr
ext r
apply eq_of_le_of_le
· apply iSup_mono'
intro C
use ‖p 0‖ ⊔ (C * r)
apply iSup_mono'
intro h
simp only [le_refl, le_sup_iff, exists_prop, and_true]
intro n
rcases n with - | m
· simp
right
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (h m) zero_le_coe
· apply iSup_mono'
intro C
use ‖p 1‖ ⊔ C / r
apply iSup_mono'
intro h
simp only [le_refl, le_sup_iff, exists_prop, and_true]
intro n
cases eq_zero_or_pos r with
| inl hr =>
rw [hr]
cases n <;> simp
| inr hr =>
right
rw [← NNReal.coe_pos] at hr
specialize h (n + 1)
rw [le_div_iff₀ hr]
rwa [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc] at h
@[simp]
theorem radius_unshift (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E (E →L[𝕜] F)) (z : F) :
(p.unshift z).radius = p.radius := by
rw [← radius_shift, unshift_shift]
protected theorem hasSum [CompleteSpace F] (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) p.radius) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => x) (p.sum x) :=
(p.summable hx).hasSum
theorem radius_le_radius_continuousLinearMap_comp (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F)
(f : F →L[𝕜] G) : p.radius ≤ (f.compFormalMultilinearSeries p).radius := by
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr => ?_
apply le_radius_of_isBigO
apply (IsBigO.trans_isLittleO _ (p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius hr)).isBigO
refine IsBigO.mul (@IsBigOWith.isBigO _ _ _ _ _ ‖f‖ _ _ _ ?_) (isBigO_refl _ _)
refine IsBigOWith.of_bound (Eventually.of_forall fun n => ?_)
simpa only [norm_norm] using f.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le (p n)
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### Expanding a function as a power series -/
section
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {s t : Set E} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Given a function `f : E → F` and a formal multilinear series `p`, we say that `f` has `p` as
a power series on the ball of radius `r > 0` around `x` if `f (x + y) = ∑' pₙ yⁿ` for all `‖y‖ < r`.
-/
structure HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
Prop where
r_le : r ≤ p.radius
r_pos : 0 < r
hasSum :
∀ {y}, y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r → HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y))
/-- Analogue of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall` where convergence is required only on a set `s`. We also
require convergence at `x` as the behavior of this notion is very bad otherwise. -/
structure HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (s : Set E)
(x : E) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : Prop where
/-- `p` converges on `ball 0 r` -/
r_le : r ≤ p.radius
/-- The radius of convergence is positive -/
r_pos : 0 < r
/-- `p converges to f` within `s` -/
hasSum : ∀ {y}, x + y ∈ insert x s → y ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r →
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y))
/-- Given a function `f : E → F` and a formal multilinear series `p`, we say that `f` has `p` as
a power series around `x` if `f (x + y) = ∑' pₙ yⁿ` for all `y` in a neighborhood of `0`. -/
def HasFPowerSeriesAt (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) :=
∃ r, HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r
/-- Analogue of `HasFPowerSeriesAt` where convergence is required only on a set `s`. -/
def HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (f : E → F) (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ r, HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r
-- Teach the `bound` tactic that power series have positive radius
attribute [bound_forward] HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.r_pos HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.r_pos
variable (𝕜)
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, we say that `f` is analytic at `x` if it admits a convergent power
series expansion around `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def AnalyticAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x
/-- `f` is analytic within `s` at `x` if it has a power series at `x` that converges on `𝓝[s] x` -/
def AnalyticWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop :=
∃ p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F, HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x
/-- Given a function `f : E → F`, we say that `f` is analytic on a set `s` if it is analytic around
every point of `s`. -/
def AnalyticOnNhd (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x, x ∈ s → AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x
/-- `f` is analytic within `s` if it is analytic within `s` at each point of `s`. Note that
this is weaker than `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`, as `f` is allowed to be arbitrary outside `s`. -/
def AnalyticOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-!
### `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall` and `HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall`
-/
variable {𝕜}
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x :=
⟨r, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨p, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.analyticAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFPowerSeriesAt.analyticAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x :=
⟨r, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.analyticWithinAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := ⟨p, hf⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.analyticWithinAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
hf.hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.analyticWithinAt
/-- If a function `f` has a power series `p` around `x`, then the function `z ↦ f (z - y)` has the
same power series around `x + y`. -/
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.comp_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (y : E) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun z => f (z - y)) p (x + y) r :=
{ r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun {z} hz => by
convert hf.hasSum hz using 2
abel }
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ (insert x s) ∩ EMetric.ball x r) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => y - x) (f y) := by
have : y - x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using hy.2
have := hf.hasSum (by simpa only [add_sub_cancel] using hy.1) this
simpa only [add_sub_cancel]
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) {y : E}
(hy : y ∈ EMetric.ball x r) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ => y - x) (f y) := by
have : y - x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using hy
simpa only [add_sub_cancel] using hf.hasSum this
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : 0 < p.radius :=
lt_of_lt_of_le hf.r_pos hf.r_le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) :
0 < p.radius :=
lt_of_lt_of_le hf.r_pos hf.r_le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.radius_pos (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : 0 < p.radius :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.radius_pos
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.of_le
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) (r'_pos : 0 < r') (hr : r' ≤ r) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r' :=
⟨le_trans hr hf.1, r'_pos, fun hy h'y => hf.hasSum hy (EMetric.ball_subset_ball hr h'y)⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) (r'_pos : 0 < r')
(hr : r' ≤ r) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r' :=
⟨le_trans hr hf.1, r'_pos, fun hy => hf.hasSum (EMetric.ball_subset_ball hr hy)⟩
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.congr {f g : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
{s : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r)
(h' : EqOn g f (s ∩ EMetric.ball x r)) (h'' : g x = f x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g p s x r := by
refine ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, ?_⟩
intro y hy h'y
convert h.hasSum hy h'y using 1
simp only [mem_insert_iff, add_eq_left] at hy
rcases hy with rfl | hy
· simpa using h''
· apply h'
refine ⟨hy, ?_⟩
simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using h'y
/-- Variant of `HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.congr` in which one requests equality on `insert x s`
instead of separating `x` and `s`. -/
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.congr' {f g : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
{s : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r)
(h' : EqOn g f (insert x s ∩ EMetric.ball x r)) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g p s x r := by
refine ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} hy h'y ↦ ?_⟩
convert h.hasSum hy h'y using 1
exact h' ⟨hy, by simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using h'y⟩
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.congr {f g : E → F} {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {s : Set E}
{x : E} (h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) (h' : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (h'' : g x = f x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt g p s x := by
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0, EMetric.ball x ε ∩ s ⊆ {y | g y = f y} :=
EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h'
let r' := min r ε
refine ⟨r', ?_⟩
have := hr.of_le (r' := r') (by simp [r', εpos, hr.r_pos]) (min_le_left _ _)
apply this.congr _ h''
intro z hz
exact hε ⟨EMetric.ball_subset_ball (min_le_right _ _) hz.2, hz.1⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.congr (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(hg : EqOn f g (EMetric.ball x r)) : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g p x r :=
{ r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum := fun {y} hy => by
convert hf.hasSum hy using 1
apply hg.symm
simpa [edist_eq_enorm_sub] using hy }
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.congr (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
HasFPowerSeriesAt g p x := by
rcases hf with ⟨r₁, h₁⟩
rcases EMetric.mem_nhds_iff.mp hg with ⟨r₂, h₂pos, h₂⟩
exact ⟨min r₁ r₂,
(h₁.mono (lt_min h₁.r_pos h₂pos) inf_le_left).congr
fun y hy => h₂ (EMetric.ball_subset_ball inf_le_right hy)⟩
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.unique (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall g p s x r) :
(insert x s ∩ EMetric.ball x r).EqOn f g := fun _ hy ↦
(hf.hasSum_sub hy).unique (hg.hasSum_sub hy)
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.unique (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
(hg : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall g p x r) : (EMetric.ball x r).EqOn f g := fun _ hy ↦
(hf.hasSum_sub hy).unique (hg.hasSum_sub hy)
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.eventually (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) :
∀ᶠ r : ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝[>] 0, HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hr.r_pos) fun _ hr' => hr.of_le hr'.1 hr'.2.le
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ r : ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝[>] 0, HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hr.r_pos) fun _ hr' => hr.mono hr'.1 hr'.2.le
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 0, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y)) := by
filter_upwards [EMetric.ball_mem_nhds (0 : E) hf.r_pos] using fun _ => hf.hasSum
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 0, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y) (f (x + y)) :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_hasSum
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y - x) (f y) := by
filter_upwards [EMetric.ball_mem_nhds x hf.r_pos] with y using hf.hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_hasSum_sub (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, HasSum (fun n : ℕ => p n fun _ : Fin n => y - x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_hasSum_sub
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.eventually_eq_zero
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) x r) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, f z = 0 := by
filter_upwards [hf.eventually_hasSum_sub] with z hz using hz.unique hasSum_zero
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.eventually_eq_zero
(hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) x) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 x, f z = 0 :=
let ⟨_, hr⟩ := hf
hr.eventually_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p univ x r ↔ HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} m ↦ h.hasSum (by simp) m⟩
· intro h
exact ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} _ m => h.hasSum m⟩
@[simp] lemma hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_univ :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p univ x ↔ HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x := by
simp only [HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt, hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ, HasFPowerSeriesAt]
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) (h : t ⊆ s) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p t x r where
r_le := hf.r_le
r_pos := hf.r_pos
hasSum hy h'y := hf.hasSum (insert_subset_insert h hy) h'y
lemma HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ] at hf
exact hf.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) (h : t ⊆ s) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p t x := by
obtain ⟨r, hp⟩ := hf
exact ⟨r, hp.mono h⟩
lemma HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_univ] at hf
apply hf.mono (subset_univ _)
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x) (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p t x := by
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
rcases EMetric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 hst with ⟨r', r'_pos, hr'⟩
refine ⟨min r r', ?_⟩
have Z := hr.of_le (by simp [r'_pos, hr.r_pos]) (min_le_left r r')
refine ⟨Z.r_le, Z.r_pos, fun {y} hy h'y ↦ ?_⟩
apply Z.hasSum ?_ h'y
simp only [mem_insert_iff, add_eq_left] at hy
rcases hy with rfl | hy
· simp
apply mem_insert_of_mem _ (hr' ?_)
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_enorm_sub, sub_zero, lt_min_iff, mem_inter_iff,
add_sub_cancel_left, hy, and_true] at h'y ⊢
exact h'y.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
@[simp] lemma hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_insert_self :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p (insert x s) x r ↔ HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩ <;>
exact ⟨h.r_le, h.r_pos, fun {y} ↦ by simpa only [insert_idem] using h.hasSum (y := y)⟩
@[simp] theorem hasFPowerSeriesWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p (insert y s) x ↔ HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f p s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | hy
· simp [HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt]
· refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert _ _), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
apply HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin h
rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne hy]
exact self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f pf s x r)
(v : Fin 0 → E) : pf 0 v = f x := by
have v_eq : v = fun i => 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
have zero_mem : (0 : E) ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : E) r := by simp [hf.r_pos]
have : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → (pf i fun _ => 0) = 0 := by
intro i hi
have : 0 < i := pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hi
exact ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero _ (⟨0, this⟩ : Fin i) rfl
have A := (hf.hasSum (by simp) zero_mem).unique (hasSum_single _ this)
simpa [v_eq] using A.symm
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x r)
(v : Fin 0 → E) : pf 0 v = f x := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ] at hf
exact hf.coeff_zero v
theorem HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesWithinAt f pf s x) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
pf 0 v = f x :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.coeff_zero v
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.coeff_zero (hf : HasFPowerSeriesAt f pf x) (v : Fin 0 → E) :
pf 0 v = f x :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.coeff_zero v
/-!
### Analytic functions
-/
@[simp] theorem analyticOn_empty : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f ∅ := by intro; simp
@[simp] theorem analyticOnNhd_empty : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f ∅ := by intro; simp
@[simp] lemma analyticWithinAt_univ :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp [AnalyticWithinAt, AnalyticAt]
@[simp] lemma analyticOn_univ {f : E → F} :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 f univ ↔ AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f univ := by
simp only [AnalyticOn, analyticWithinAt_univ, AnalyticOnNhd]
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.mono (hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : t ⊆ s) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f t x := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hf
exact ⟨p, hp.mono h⟩
lemma AnalyticAt.analyticWithinAt (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rw [← analyticWithinAt_univ] at hf
apply hf.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma AnalyticOnNhd.analyticOn (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).analyticWithinAt
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq {f g : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hs : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : g x = f x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x := by
rcases hf with ⟨p, hp⟩
exact ⟨p, hp.congr hs hx⟩
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert {f g : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hs : g =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x := by
apply hf.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono x (subset_insert x s) hs)
apply mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) hs
lemma AnalyticWithinAt.congr {f g : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E}
(hf : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hs : EqOn g f s) (hx : g x = f x) :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 g s x :=
hf.congr_of_eventuallyEq hs.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin hx
lemma AnalyticOn.congr {f g : E → F} {s : Set E}
(hf : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : EqOn g f s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 g s :=
fun x m ↦ (hf x m).congr hs (hs m)
theorem AnalyticAt.congr (hf : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x :=
let ⟨_, hpf⟩ := hf
(hpf.congr hg).analyticAt
theorem analyticAt_congr (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x ↔ AnalyticAt 𝕜 g x :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.congr h, fun hg ↦ hg.congr h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.mono {s t : Set E} (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f t) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s :=
fun z hz => hf z (hst hz)
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.congr' (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hg : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).congr (mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mp hg z hz)
theorem analyticOnNhd_congr' (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s ↔ AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticOnNhd.congr (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) (hg : s.EqOn f g) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s :=
hf.congr' <| mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.mpr
(fun _ hz => eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨s, hs.mem_nhds hz, hg⟩)
theorem analyticOnNhd_congr (hs : IsOpen s) (h : s.EqOn f g) : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s ↔
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 g s := ⟨fun hf => hf.congr hs h, fun hg => hg.congr hs h.symm⟩
theorem AnalyticWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f t x := by
rcases h with ⟨p, hp⟩
exact ⟨p, hp.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias AnalyticWithinAt.mono_of_mem := AnalyticWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
lemma AnalyticOn.mono {f : E → F} {s t : Set E} (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f t)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun _ m ↦ (h _ (hs m)).mono hs
@[simp] theorem analyticWithinAt_insert {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x y : E} :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert y s) x ↔ AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp [AnalyticWithinAt]
/-!
### Composition with linear maps
-/
/-- If a function `f` has a power series `p` on a ball within a set and `g` is linear,
then `g ∘ f` has the power series `g ∘ p` on the same ball. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(h : HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall f p s x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall (g ∘ f) (g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p) s x r where
r_le := h.r_le.trans (p.radius_le_radius_continuousLinearMap_comp _)
r_pos := h.r_pos
hasSum hy h'y := by
simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.compFormalMultilinearSeries_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, Function.comp_apply] using
g.hasSum (h.hasSum hy h'y)
/-- If a function `f` has a power series `p` on a ball and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` has the
power series `g ∘ p` on the same ball. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (g ∘ f) (g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p) x r := by
rw [← hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall_univ] at h ⊢
exact g.comp_hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall h
/-- If a function `f` is analytic on a set `s` and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` is analytic
on `s`. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_analyticOn (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s := by
rintro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨p, r, hp⟩
exact ⟨g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p, r, g.comp_hasFPowerSeriesWithinOnBall hp⟩
/-- If a function `f` is analytic on a set `s` and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` is analytic
on `s`. -/
| theorem ContinuousLinearMap.comp_analyticOnNhd
{s : Set E} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (h : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s) :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s := by
rintro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨p, r, hp⟩
exact ⟨g.compFormalMultilinearSeries p, r, g.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall hp⟩
/-!
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 848 | 855 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Fibration
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps.OpenQuotient
/-!
# Inseparable points in a topological space
In this file we prove basic properties of the following notions defined elsewhere.
* `Specializes` (notation: `x ⤳ y`) : a relation saying that `𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝 y`;
* `Inseparable`: a relation saying that two points in a topological space have the same
neighbourhoods; equivalently, they can't be separated by an open set;
* `InseparableSetoid X`: same relation, as a `Setoid`;
* `SeparationQuotient X`: the quotient of `X` by its `InseparableSetoid`.
We also prove various basic properties of the relation `Inseparable`.
## Notations
- `x ⤳ y`: notation for `Specializes x y`;
- `x ~ᵢ y` is used as a local notation for `Inseparable x y`;
- `𝓝 x` is the neighbourhoods filter `nhds x` of a point `x`, defined elsewhere.
## Tags
topological space, separation setoid
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology List
variable {X Y Z α ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[TopologicalSpace Z] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {x y z : X} {s : Set X} {f g : X → Y}
/-!
### `Specializes` relation
-/
/-- A collection of equivalent definitions of `x ⤳ y`. The public API is given by `iff` lemmas
below. -/
theorem specializes_TFAE (x y : X) :
TFAE [x ⤳ y,
pure x ≤ 𝓝 y,
∀ s : Set X , IsOpen s → y ∈ s → x ∈ s,
∀ s : Set X , IsClosed s → x ∈ s → y ∈ s,
y ∈ closure ({ x } : Set X),
closure ({ y } : Set X) ⊆ closure { x },
ClusterPt y (pure x)] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := (pure_le_nhds _).trans
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h s hso hy => h (hso.mem_nhds hy)
tfae_have 3 → 4 := fun h s hsc hx => of_not_not fun hy => h sᶜ hsc.isOpen_compl hy hx
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun h => h _ isClosed_closure (subset_closure <| mem_singleton _)
tfae_have 6 ↔ 5 := isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff.trans singleton_subset_iff
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7 := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_clusterPt, principal_singleton]
tfae_have 5 → 1 := by
refine fun h => (nhds_basis_opens _).ge_iff.2 ?_
rintro s ⟨hy, ho⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 h s ho hy with ⟨z, hxs, rfl : z = x⟩
exact ho.mem_nhds hxs
tfae_finish
theorem specializes_iff_nhds : x ⤳ y ↔ 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝 y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Specializes.not_disjoint (h : x ⤳ y) : ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := fun hd ↦
absurd (hd.mono_right h) <| by simp [NeBot.ne']
theorem specializes_iff_pure : x ⤳ y ↔ pure x ≤ 𝓝 y :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 1
| alias ⟨Specializes.nhds_le_nhds, _⟩ := specializes_iff_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Inseparable.lean | 82 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series (in one variable)
This file defines (univariate) formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
Formal power series in one variable are defined from multivariate
power series as `PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
The file sets up the (semi)ring structure on univariate power series.
We provide the natural inclusion from polynomials to formal power series.
Additional results can be found in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc`, truncation of power series;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse`, about inverses of power series,
and the fact that power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Order`, the order of a power series at 0,
and application to the fact that power series over an integral domain
form an integral domain.
## Implementation notes
Because of its definition,
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
a lot of proofs and properties from the multivariate case
can be ported to the single variable case.
However, it means that formal power series are indexed by `Unit →₀ ℕ`,
which is of course canonically isomorphic to `ℕ`.
We then build some glue to treat formal power series as if they were indexed by `ℕ`.
Occasionally this leads to proofs that are uglier than expected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Formal power series over a coefficient type `R` -/
abbrev PowerSeries (R : Type*) :=
MvPowerSeries Unit R
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section
-- Porting note: not available in Lean 4
-- local reducible PowerSeries
/--
`R⟦X⟧` is notation for `PowerSeries R`,
the semiring of formal power series in one variable over a semiring `R`.
-/
scoped notation:9000 R "⟦X⟧" => PowerSeries R
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Zero R] : Zero R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Semiring R] : Semiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Ring R] : Ring R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial R⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S A⟦X⟧ :=
Pi.isScalarTower
instance {A} [Semiring A] [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R A] : Algebra R A⟦X⟧ := by
dsimp only [PowerSeries]
infer_instance
end
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : ℕ) : R⟦X⟧ →ₗ[R] R :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff R (single () n)
/-- The `n`th monomial with coefficient `a` as formal power series. -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.monomial R (single () n)
variable {R}
theorem coeff_def {s : Unit →₀ ℕ} {n : ℕ} (h : s () = n) : coeff R n = MvPowerSeries.coeff R s := by
rw [coeff, ← h, ← Finsupp.unique_single s]
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : ∀ n, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
MvPowerSeries.ext fun n => by
rw [← coeff_def]
· apply h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_coeff_eq_zero (φ : R⟦X⟧) : (∀ n, coeff R n φ = 0) ↔ φ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ext h, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
/-- Two formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc PowerSeries.ext_iff
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ := by
simp only [subsingleton_iff, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
subsingleton
/-- Constructor for formal power series. -/
def mk {R} (f : ℕ → R) : R⟦X⟧ := fun s => f (s ())
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R) : coeff R n (mk f) = f n :=
congr_arg f Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial (m n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 :=
calc
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = _ := MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial _ _ _
_ = if m = n then a else 0 := by simp only [Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff]
theorem monomial_eq_mk (n : ℕ) (a : R) : monomial R n a = mk fun m => if m = n then a else 0 :=
ext fun m => by rw [coeff_monomial, coeff_mk]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
variable (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : R⟦X⟧ →+* R :=
MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff Unit R
/-- The constant formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.C Unit R
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_eq {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] : algebraMap R R⟦X⟧ = C R := rfl
variable {R}
/-- The variable of the formal power series ring. -/
def X : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.X ()
theorem commute_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : Commute φ X :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X _ _
theorem X_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = φ * X :=
MvPowerSeries.X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X ^ n) :=
MvPowerSeries.commute_X_pow _ _ _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * φ = φ * X ^ n :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R 0) = constantCoeff R := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero]
rfl
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 φ = constantCoeff R φ := by
rw [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R 0) = C R := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `rw; rfl` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [monomial, Finsupp.single_zero, MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C]
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R 0 a = C R a := by simp
theorem coeff_C (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then a else 0 := by
rw [← monomial_zero_eq_C_apply, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R 0 (C R a) = a := by
rw [coeff_C, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_ne_zero_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : coeff R n (C R a) = 0 := by
rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_C {a : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff R (n + 1) (C R a) = 0 :=
coeff_ne_zero_C n.succ_ne_zero
theorem C_injective : Function.Injective (C R) := by
intro a b H
simp_rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at H
simpa only [coeff_zero_C] using H 0
protected theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton R⟦X⟧ ↔ Subsingleton R := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
rw [subsingleton_iff] at h ⊢
exact fun a b ↦ C_injective (h (C R a) (C R b))
theorem X_eq : (X : R⟦X⟧) = monomial R 1 1 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_X (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (X : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 1 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X : coeff R 0 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
rw [coeff, Finsupp.single_zero, X, MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_X : coeff R 1 (X : R⟦X⟧) = 1 := by rw [coeff_X, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : (X : R⟦X⟧) ≠ 0 := fun H => by
simpa only [coeff_one_X, one_ne_zero, map_zero] using congr_arg (coeff R 1) H
theorem X_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n = monomial R n 1 :=
MvPowerSeries.X_pow_eq _ n
theorem coeff_X_pow (m n : ℕ) : coeff R m ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = if m = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff R n ((X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n) = 1 := by
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (1 : R⟦X⟧) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C n 1
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R 0 (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_mul (n : ℕ) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
-- `rw` can't see that `PowerSeries = MvPowerSeries Unit`, so use `.trans`
refine (MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul _ φ ψ).trans ?_
rw [Finsupp.antidiagonal_single, Finset.sum_map]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : coeff R n (φ * C R a) = coeff R n φ * a :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_C _ φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : coeff R n (C R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_C_mul _ φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S] (n : ℕ) (φ : PowerSeries S) (a : R) :
coeff S n (a • φ) = a • coeff S n φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S] (φ : PowerSeries S) (a : R) :
constantCoeff S (a • φ) = a • constantCoeff S φ :=
rfl
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (f : R⟦X⟧) (a : R) : a • f = C R a * f := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_mul_X (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R (n + 1) (φ * X) = coeff R n φ := by
simp only [coeff, Finsupp.single_add]
convert φ.coeff_add_mul_monomial (single () n) (single () 1) _
rw [mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_succ_X_mul (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R (n + 1) (X * φ) = coeff R n φ := by
simp only [coeff, Finsupp.single_add, add_comm n 1]
convert φ.coeff_add_monomial_mul (single () 1) (single () n) _
rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_X_cancel {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : φ * X = ψ * X) : φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + 1)
theorem mul_X_injective : Function.Injective (· * X : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ mul_X_cancel
theorem mul_X_inj {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} : φ * X = ψ * X ↔ φ = ψ :=
mul_X_injective.eq_iff
theorem X_mul_cancel {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : X * φ = X * ψ) : φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + 1)
theorem X_mul_injective : Function.Injective (X * · : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ X_mul_cancel
theorem X_mul_inj {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} : X * φ = X * ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
X_mul_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (a : R) : constantCoeff R (C R a) = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : (constantCoeff R).comp (C R) = RingHom.id R :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_zero : constantCoeff R 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_one : constantCoeff R 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X : constantCoeff R X = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X _
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_mk {f : ℕ → R} : constantCoeff R (mk f) = f 0 := rfl
theorem coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 (φ * X) = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff R 0 (X * φ) = 0 := by simp
theorem constantCoeff_surj : Function.Surjective (constantCoeff R) :=
fun r => ⟨(C R) r, constantCoeff_C r⟩
-- The following section duplicates the API of `Data.Polynomial.Coeff` and should attempt to keep
-- up to date with that
section
theorem coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (C R x * X ^ k : R⟦X⟧) = if n = k then x else 0 := by
simp [X_pow_eq, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R (d + n) (p * X ^ n) = coeff R d p := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (d, n), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, mul_one]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R (d + n) (X ^ n * p) = coeff R d p := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (n, d), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, one_mul]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_comm, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· rw [add_comm]
exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
theorem mul_X_pow_cancel {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : φ * X ^ k = ψ * X ^ k) :
φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + k)
theorem mul_X_pow_injective {k : ℕ} : Function.Injective (· * X ^ k : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ mul_X_pow_cancel
theorem mul_X_pow_inj {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} :
φ * X ^ k = ψ * X ^ k ↔ φ = ψ :=
mul_X_pow_injective.eq_iff
theorem X_pow_mul_cancel {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (h : X ^ k * φ = X ^ k * ψ) :
φ = ψ := by
rw [PowerSeries.ext_iff] at h ⊢
intro n
simpa using h (n + k)
theorem X_pow_mul_injective {k : ℕ} : Function.Injective (X ^ k * · : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) :=
fun _ _ ↦ X_pow_mul_cancel
theorem X_pow_mul_inj {k : ℕ} {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} :
X ^ k * φ = X ^ k * ψ ↔ φ = ψ :=
X_pow_mul_injective.eq_iff
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow' (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R d (p * X ^ n) = ite (n ≤ d) (coeff R (d - n) p) 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, coeff_mul_X_pow, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· refine (coeff_mul _ _ _).trans (Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_)
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
exact ((le_of_add_le_right (mem_antidiagonal.mp hx).le).trans_lt <| not_le.mp h).ne
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul' (p : R⟦X⟧) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff R d (X ^ n * p) = ite (n ≤ d) (coeff R (d - n) p) 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, coeff_X_pow_mul]
simp
· refine (coeff_mul _ _ _).trans (Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_)
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, zero_mul]
have := mem_antidiagonal.mp hx
rw [add_comm] at this
exact ((le_of_add_le_right this.le).trans_lt <| not_le.mp h).ne
end
/-- If a formal power series is invertible, then so is its constant coefficient. -/
theorem isUnit_constantCoeff (φ : R⟦X⟧) (h : IsUnit φ) : IsUnit (constantCoeff R φ) :=
MvPowerSeries.isUnit_constantCoeff φ h
/-- Split off the constant coefficient. -/
theorem eq_shift_mul_X_add_const (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ = (mk fun p => coeff R (p + 1) φ) * X + C R (constantCoeff R φ) := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp only [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff, map_add, map_mul, constantCoeff_X,
mul_zero, coeff_zero_C, zero_add]
· simp only [coeff_succ_mul_X, coeff_mk, LinearMap.map_add, coeff_C, n.succ_ne_zero, sub_zero,
if_false, add_zero]
/-- Split off the constant coefficient. -/
theorem eq_X_mul_shift_add_const (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
φ = (X * mk fun p => coeff R (p + 1) φ) + C R (constantCoeff R φ) := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp only [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff, map_add, map_mul, constantCoeff_X,
zero_mul, coeff_zero_C, zero_add]
· simp only [coeff_succ_X_mul, coeff_mk, LinearMap.map_add, coeff_C, n.succ_ne_zero, sub_zero,
if_false, add_zero]
section Map
variable {S : Type*} {T : Type*} [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T)
/-- The map between formal power series induced by a map on the coefficients. -/
def map : R⟦X⟧ →+* S⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.map _ f
@[simp]
theorem map_id : (map (RingHom.id R) : R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧) = id :=
rfl
theorem map_comp : map (g.comp f) = (map g).comp (map f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_map (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : coeff S n (map f φ) = f (coeff R n φ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_C (r : R) : map f (C _ r) = C _ (f r) := by
ext
simp [coeff_C, apply_ite f]
@[simp]
theorem map_X : map f X = X := by
ext
simp [coeff_X, apply_ite f]
theorem map_surjective (f : S →+* T) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (PowerSeries.map f) := by
intro g
use PowerSeries.mk fun k ↦ Function.surjInv hf (PowerSeries.coeff _ k g)
ext k
simp only [Function.surjInv, coeff_map, coeff_mk]
exact Classical.choose_spec (hf ((coeff T k) g))
theorem map_injective (f : S →+* T) (hf : Function.Injective ⇑f) :
Function.Injective (PowerSeries.map f) := by
intro u v huv
ext k
apply hf
rw [← PowerSeries.coeff_map, ← PowerSeries.coeff_map, huv]
end Map
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero {R S : Type*} [DivisionSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (φ : R⟦X⟧)
(f : R →+* S) : φ.map f = 0 ↔ φ = 0 :=
MvPowerSeries.map_eq_zero _ _
|
theorem X_pow_dvd_iff {n : ℕ} {φ : R⟦X⟧} :
(X : R⟦X⟧) ^ n ∣ φ ↔ ∀ m, m < n → coeff R m φ = 0 := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Basic.lean | 545 | 547 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condExp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condExp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
variable (E) in
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condExp_zero]; simp⟩
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
| protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 84 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Group
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence
/-!
# Division polynomials of Weierstrass curves
This file defines certain polynomials associated to division polynomials of Weierstrass curves.
These are defined in terms of the auxiliary sequences for normalised elliptic divisibility sequences
(EDS) as defined in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring `R`. The sequence of `n`-division polynomials
`ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` of `W` is the normalised EDS with initial values
* `ψ₀ := 0`,
* `ψ₁ := 1`,
* `ψ₂ := 2Y + a₁X + a₃`,
* `ψ₃ := 3X⁴ + b₂X³ + 3b₄X² + 3b₆X + b₈`, and
* `ψ₄ := ψ₂ ⬝ (2X⁶ + b₂X⁵ + 5b₄X⁴ + 10b₆X³ + 10b₈X² + (b₂b₈ - b₄b₆)X + (b₄b₈ - b₆²))`.
Furthermore, define the associated sequences `φₙ, ωₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` by
* `φₙ := Xψₙ² - ψₙ₊₁ ⬝ ψₙ₋₁`, and
* `ωₙ := (ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ - ψₙ ⬝ (a₁φₙ + a₃ψₙ²)) / 2`.
Note that `ωₙ` is always well-defined as a polynomial in `R[X, Y]`. As a start, it can be shown by
induction that `ψₙ` always divides `ψ₂ₙ` in `R[X, Y]`, so that `ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ` is always well-defined as
a polynomial, while division by `2` is well-defined when `R` has characteristic different from `2`.
In general, it can be shown that `2` always divides the polynomial `ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ - ψₙ ⬝ (a₁φₙ + a₃ψₙ²)`
in the characteristic `0` universal ring `𝓡[X, Y] := ℤ[A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, A₆][X, Y]` of `W`, where the
`Aᵢ` are indeterminates. Then `ωₙ` can be equivalently defined as the image of this division under
the associated universal morphism `𝓡[X, Y] → R[X, Y]` mapping `Aᵢ` to `aᵢ`.
Now, in the coordinate ring `R[W]`, note that `ψ₂²` is congruent to the polynomial
`Ψ₂Sq := 4X³ + b₂X² + 2b₄X + b₆ ∈ R[X]`. As such, the recurrences of a normalised EDS show that
`ψₙ / ψ₂` are congruent to certain polynomials in `R[W]`. In particular, define `preΨₙ ∈ R[X]` as
the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS with extra parameter `Ψ₂Sq²` and initial values
* `preΨ₀ := 0`,
* `preΨ₁ := 1`,
* `preΨ₂ := 1`,
* `preΨ₃ := ψ₃`, and
* `preΨ₄ := ψ₄ / ψ₂`.
The corresponding normalised EDS `Ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` is then given by
* `Ψₙ := preΨₙ ⬝ ψ₂` if `n` is even, and
* `Ψₙ := preΨₙ` if `n` is odd.
Furthermore, define the associated sequences `ΨSqₙ, Φₙ ∈ R[X]` by
* `ΨSqₙ := preΨₙ² ⬝ Ψ₂Sq` if `n` is even,
* `ΨSqₙ := preΨₙ²` if `n` is odd,
* `Φₙ := XΨSqₙ - preΨₙ₊₁ ⬝ preΨₙ₋₁` if `n` is even, and
* `Φₙ := XΨSqₙ - preΨₙ₊₁ ⬝ preΨₙ₋₁ ⬝ Ψ₂Sq` if `n` is odd.
With these definitions, `ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` and `φₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` are congruent in `R[W]` to `Ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]`
and `Φₙ ∈ R[X]` respectively, which are defined in terms of `Ψ₂Sq ∈ R[X]` and `preΨₙ ∈ R[X]`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.preΨ`: the univariate polynomials `preΨₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.ΨSq`: the univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Ψ`: the bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Φ`: the univariate polynomials `Φₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.ψ`: the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.φ`: the bivariate polynomials `φₙ`.
* TODO: the bivariate polynomials `ωₙ`.
## Implementation notes
Analogously to `Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence`, the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` are defined in terms of the univariate polynomials `preΨₙ`. This is done partially to avoid
ring division, but more crucially to allow the definition of `ΨSqₙ` and `Φₙ` as univariate
polynomials without needing to work under the coordinate ring, and to allow the computation of their
leading terms without ambiguity. Furthermore, evaluating these polynomials at a rational point on
`W` recovers their original definition up to linear combinations of the Weierstrass equation of `W`,
hence also avoiding the need to work in the coordinate ring.
TODO: implementation notes for the definition of `ωₙ`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, division polynomial, torsion point
-/
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, map_div₀,
Polynomial.map_ofNat, Polynomial.map_one, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_neg, Polynomial.map_add,
Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_div, coe_mapRingHom,
apply_ite <| mapRingHom _, WeierstrassCurve.map])
universe r s u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type r} {S : Type s} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : WeierstrassCurve R)
section Ψ₂Sq
/-! ### The univariate polynomial `Ψ₂Sq` -/
/-- The `2`-division polynomial `ψ₂ = Ψ₂`. -/
noncomputable def ψ₂ : R[X][Y] :=
W.toAffine.polynomialY
/-- The univariate polynomial `Ψ₂Sq` congruent to `ψ₂²`. -/
noncomputable def Ψ₂Sq : R[X] :=
C 4 * X ^ 3 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 2 + C (2 * W.b₄) * X + C W.b₆
lemma C_Ψ₂Sq : C W.Ψ₂Sq = W.ψ₂ ^ 2 - 4 * W.toAffine.polynomial := by
rw [Ψ₂Sq, ψ₂, b₂, b₄, b₆, Affine.polynomialY, Affine.polynomial]
C_simp
ring1
lemma ψ₂_sq : W.ψ₂ ^ 2 = C W.Ψ₂Sq + 4 * W.toAffine.polynomial := by
rw [C_Ψ₂Sq, sub_add_cancel]
lemma Affine.CoordinateRing.mk_ψ₂_sq : mk W W.ψ₂ ^ 2 = mk W (C W.Ψ₂Sq) := by
rw [C_Ψ₂Sq, map_sub, map_mul, AdjoinRoot.mk_self, mul_zero, sub_zero, map_pow]
-- TODO: remove `twoTorsionPolynomial` in favour of `Ψ₂Sq`
lemma Ψ₂Sq_eq : W.Ψ₂Sq = W.twoTorsionPolynomial.toPoly :=
rfl
end Ψ₂Sq
section preΨ'
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℕ` -/
/-- The `3`-division polynomial `ψ₃ = Ψ₃`. -/
noncomputable def Ψ₃ : R[X] :=
3 * X ^ 4 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 3 + 3 * C W.b₄ * X ^ 2 + 3 * C W.b₆ * X + C W.b₈
/-- The univariate polynomial `preΨ₄`, which is auxiliary to the 4-division polynomial
`ψ₄ = Ψ₄ = preΨ₄ψ₂`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ₄ : R[X] :=
2 * X ^ 6 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 5 + 5 * C W.b₄ * X ^ 4 + 10 * C W.b₆ * X ^ 3 + 10 * C W.b₈ * X ^ 2 +
C (W.b₂ * W.b₈ - W.b₄ * W.b₆) * X + C (W.b₄ * W.b₈ - W.b₆ ^ 2)
/-- The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℕ`, which are auxiliary to the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` congruent to the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ' (n : ℕ) : R[X] :=
preNormEDS' (W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) W.Ψ₃ W.preΨ₄ n
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_zero : W.preΨ' 0 = 0 :=
preNormEDS'_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_one : W.preΨ' 1 = 1 :=
preNormEDS'_one ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_two : W.preΨ' 2 = 1 :=
preNormEDS'_two ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_three : W.preΨ' 3 = W.Ψ₃ :=
preNormEDS'_three ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_four : W.preΨ' 4 = W.preΨ₄ :=
preNormEDS'_four ..
lemma preΨ'_even (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ' (2 * (m + 3)) =
W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 5) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS'_even ..
lemma preΨ'_odd (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ' (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.preΨ' (m + 4) * W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS'_odd ..
end preΨ'
section preΨ
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℤ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℤ`, which are auxiliary to the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` congruent to the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
preNormEDS (W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) W.Ψ₃ W.preΨ₄ n
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.preΨ n = W.preΨ' n :=
preNormEDS_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_zero : W.preΨ 0 = 0 :=
preNormEDS_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_one : W.preΨ 1 = 1 :=
preNormEDS_one ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_two : W.preΨ 2 = 1 :=
preNormEDS_two ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_three : W.preΨ 3 = W.Ψ₃ :=
preNormEDS_three ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_four : W.preΨ 4 = W.preΨ₄ :=
preNormEDS_four ..
lemma preΨ_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ (2 * (m + 3)) =
W.preΨ (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ (m + 3) * W.preΨ (m + 5) -
W.preΨ (m + 1) * W.preΨ (m + 3) * W.preΨ (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS_even_ofNat ..
lemma preΨ_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.preΨ (m + 4) * W.preΨ (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m + 1) * W.preΨ (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS_odd_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_neg (n : ℤ) : W.preΨ (-n) = -W.preΨ n :=
preNormEDS_neg ..
lemma preΨ_even (m : ℤ) : W.preΨ (2 * m) =
W.preΨ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 2) -
W.preΨ (m - 2) * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS_even ..
lemma preΨ_odd (m : ℤ) : W.preΨ (2 * m + 1) =
W.preΨ (m + 2) * W.preΨ m ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m - 1) * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS_odd ..
end preΨ
section ΨSq
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ` congruent to `ψₙ²`. -/
noncomputable def ΨSq (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
W.preΨ n ^ 2 * if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.ΨSq n = W.preΨ' n ^ 2 * if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1 := by
simp only [ΨSq, preΨ_ofNat, Int.even_coe_nat]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_zero : W.ΨSq 0 = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero, zero_mul]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_one : W.ΨSq 1 = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_one, one_pow, one_mul, if_neg Nat.not_even_one]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_two : W.ΨSq 2 = W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_two, one_pow, one_mul, if_pos even_two]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_three : W.ΨSq 3 = W.Ψ₃ ^ 2 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_three, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_three, if_neg <| by decide, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_four : W.ΨSq 4 = W.preΨ₄ ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [← Nat.cast_four, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_four, if_pos <| by decide]
lemma ΨSq_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.ΨSq (2 * (m + 3)) =
(W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 5) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 4) ^ 2) ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw_mod_cast [ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_even, if_pos <| even_two_mul _]
lemma ΨSq_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.ΨSq (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
(W.preΨ' (m + 4) * W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2)) ^ 2 := by
rw_mod_cast [ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_odd, if_neg (m + 2).not_even_two_mul_add_one, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_neg (n : ℤ) : W.ΨSq (-n) = W.ΨSq n := by
simp only [ΨSq, preΨ_neg, neg_sq, even_neg]
lemma ΨSq_even (m : ℤ) : W.ΨSq (2 * m) =
(W.preΨ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 2) -
W.preΨ (m - 2) * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 2) ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [ΨSq, preΨ_even, if_pos <| even_two_mul _]
lemma ΨSq_odd (m : ℤ) : W.ΨSq (2 * m + 1) =
(W.preΨ (m + 2) * W.preΨ m ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m - 1) * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2)) ^ 2 := by
rw [ΨSq, preΨ_odd, if_neg m.not_even_two_mul_add_one, mul_one]
end ΨSq
section Ψ
/-! ### The bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ` -/
/-- The bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ` congruent to the `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
protected noncomputable def Ψ (n : ℤ) : R[X][Y] :=
C (W.preΨ n) * if Even n then W.ψ₂ else 1
open WeierstrassCurve (Ψ)
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.Ψ n = C (W.preΨ' n) * if Even n then W.ψ₂ else 1 := by
simp only [Ψ, preΨ_ofNat, Int.even_coe_nat]
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_zero : W.Ψ 0 = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Ψ_ofNat, preΨ'_zero, C_0, zero_mul]
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_one : W.Ψ 1 = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, Ψ_ofNat, preΨ'_one, C_1, if_neg Nat.not_even_one, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_two : W.Ψ 2 = W.ψ₂ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, Ψ_ofNat, preΨ'_two, C_1, one_mul, if_pos even_two]
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_three : W.Ψ 3 = C W.Ψ₃ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_three, Ψ_ofNat, preΨ'_three, if_neg <| by decide, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_four : W.Ψ 4 = C W.preΨ₄ * W.ψ₂ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_four, Ψ_ofNat, preΨ'_four, if_pos <| by decide]
lemma Ψ_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.Ψ (2 * (m + 3)) * W.ψ₂ =
W.Ψ (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.Ψ (m + 3) * W.Ψ (m + 5) - W.Ψ (m + 1) * W.Ψ (m + 3) * W.Ψ (m + 4) ^ 2 := by
repeat rw_mod_cast [Ψ_ofNat]
simp_rw [preΨ'_even, if_pos <| even_two_mul _, Nat.even_add_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> C_simp <;> ring1
lemma Ψ_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.Ψ (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.Ψ (m + 4) * W.Ψ (m + 2) ^ 3 - W.Ψ (m + 1) * W.Ψ (m + 3) ^ 3 +
W.toAffine.polynomial * (16 * W.toAffine.polynomial - 8 * W.ψ₂ ^ 2) *
C (if Even m then W.preΨ' (m + 4) * W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 3
else -W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) ^ 3) := by
repeat rw_mod_cast [Ψ_ofNat]
simp_rw [preΨ'_odd, if_neg (m + 2).not_even_two_mul_add_one, Nat.even_add_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> C_simp <;> rw [C_Ψ₂Sq] <;> ring1
@[simp]
lemma Ψ_neg (n : ℤ) : W.Ψ (-n) = -W.Ψ n := by
simp only [Ψ, preΨ_neg, C_neg, neg_mul (α := R[X][Y]), even_neg]
lemma Ψ_even (m : ℤ) : W.Ψ (2 * m) * W.ψ₂ =
W.Ψ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.Ψ m * W.Ψ (m + 2) - W.Ψ (m - 2) * W.Ψ m * W.Ψ (m + 1) ^ 2 := by
repeat rw [Ψ]
simp_rw [preΨ_even, if_pos <| even_two_mul _, Int.even_add_one, show m + 2 = m + 1 + 1 by ring1,
Int.even_add_one, show m - 2 = m - 1 - 1 by ring1, Int.even_sub_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> C_simp <;> ring1
lemma Ψ_odd (m : ℤ) : W.Ψ (2 * m + 1) =
W.Ψ (m + 2) * W.Ψ m ^ 3 - W.Ψ (m - 1) * W.Ψ (m + 1) ^ 3 +
W.toAffine.polynomial * (16 * W.toAffine.polynomial - 8 * W.ψ₂ ^ 2) *
C (if Even m then W.preΨ (m + 2) * W.preΨ m ^ 3
else -W.preΨ (m - 1) * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 3) := by
repeat rw [Ψ]
simp_rw [preΨ_odd, if_neg m.not_even_two_mul_add_one, show m + 2 = m + 1 + 1 by ring1,
Int.even_add_one, Int.even_sub_one, ite_not]
split_ifs <;> C_simp <;> rw [C_Ψ₂Sq] <;> ring1
lemma Affine.CoordinateRing.mk_Ψ_sq (n : ℤ) : mk W (W.Ψ n) ^ 2 = mk W (C <| W.ΨSq n) := by
simp only [Ψ, ΨSq, map_one, map_mul, map_pow, one_pow, mul_pow, ite_pow, apply_ite C,
apply_ite <| mk W, mk_ψ₂_sq]
end Ψ
section Φ
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `Φₙ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `Φₙ` congruent to `φₙ`. -/
protected noncomputable def Φ (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
X * W.ΨSq n - W.preΨ (n + 1) * W.preΨ (n - 1) * if Even n then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq
open WeierstrassCurve (Φ)
@[simp]
lemma Φ_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.Φ (n + 1) =
X * W.preΨ' (n + 1) ^ 2 * (if Even n then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq) -
W.preΨ' (n + 2) * W.preΨ' n * (if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1) := by
rw [Φ, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ΨSq_ofNat, ← mul_assoc, ← Nat.cast_add, preΨ_ofNat,
Nat.cast_add, add_sub_cancel_right, preΨ_ofNat, ← Nat.cast_add]
simp only [Nat.even_add_one, Int.even_add_one, Int.even_coe_nat, ite_not]
@[simp]
lemma Φ_zero : W.Φ 0 = 1 := by
rw [Φ, ΨSq_zero, mul_zero, zero_sub, zero_add, preΨ_one, one_mul, zero_sub, preΨ_neg, preΨ_one,
neg_one_mul, neg_neg, if_pos Even.zero]
@[simp]
lemma Φ_one : W.Φ 1 = X := by
rw [show 1 = ((0 : ℕ) + 1 : ℤ) by rfl, Φ_ofNat, preΨ'_one, one_pow, mul_one, if_pos Even.zero,
mul_one, preΨ'_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
@[simp]
lemma Φ_two : W.Φ 2 = X ^ 4 - C W.b₄ * X ^ 2 - C (2 * W.b₆) * X - C W.b₈ := by
rw [show 2 = ((1 : ℕ) + 1 : ℤ) by rfl, Φ_ofNat, preΨ'_two, if_neg Nat.not_even_one, Ψ₂Sq,
preΨ'_three, preΨ'_one, if_neg Nat.not_even_one, Ψ₃]
C_simp
ring1
@[simp]
lemma Φ_three : W.Φ 3 = X * W.Ψ₃ ^ 2 - W.preΨ₄ * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [show 3 = ((2 : ℕ) + 1 : ℤ) by rfl, Φ_ofNat, preΨ'_three, if_pos <| by decide, mul_one,
preΨ'_four, preΨ'_two, mul_one, if_pos even_two]
@[simp]
lemma Φ_four : W.Φ 4 = X * W.preΨ₄ ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq - W.Ψ₃ * (W.preΨ₄ * W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 - W.Ψ₃ ^ 3) := by
rw [show 4 = ((3 : ℕ) + 1 : ℤ) by rfl, Φ_ofNat, preΨ'_four, if_neg <| by decide,
show 3 + 2 = 2 * 2 + 1 by rfl, preΨ'_odd, preΨ'_four, preΨ'_two, if_pos Even.zero, preΨ'_one,
preΨ'_three, if_pos Even.zero, if_neg <| by decide]
ring1
@[simp]
lemma Φ_neg (n : ℤ) : W.Φ (-n) = W.Φ n := by
simp only [Φ, ΨSq_neg, neg_add_eq_sub, ← neg_sub n, preΨ_neg, ← neg_add', preΨ_neg, neg_mul_neg,
mul_comm <| W.preΨ <| n - 1, even_neg]
end Φ
section ψ
/-! ### The bivariate polynomials `ψₙ` -/
/-- The bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
protected noncomputable def ψ (n : ℤ) : R[X][Y] :=
normEDS W.ψ₂ (C W.Ψ₃) (C W.preΨ₄) n
open WeierstrassCurve (Ψ ψ)
@[simp]
lemma ψ_zero : W.ψ 0 = 0 :=
normEDS_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma ψ_one : W.ψ 1 = 1 :=
normEDS_one ..
@[simp]
lemma ψ_two : W.ψ 2 = W.ψ₂ :=
normEDS_two ..
@[simp]
lemma ψ_three : W.ψ 3 = C W.Ψ₃ :=
normEDS_three ..
@[simp]
lemma ψ_four : W.ψ 4 = C W.preΨ₄ * W.ψ₂ :=
normEDS_four ..
lemma ψ_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.ψ (2 * (m + 3)) * W.ψ₂ =
W.ψ (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.ψ (m + 3) * W.ψ (m + 5) - W.ψ (m + 1) * W.ψ (m + 3) * W.ψ (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
normEDS_even_ofNat ..
lemma ψ_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.ψ (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.ψ (m + 4) * W.ψ (m + 2) ^ 3 - W.ψ (m + 1) * W.ψ (m + 3) ^ 3 :=
normEDS_odd_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma ψ_neg (n : ℤ) : W.ψ (-n) = -W.ψ n :=
normEDS_neg ..
| lemma ψ_even (m : ℤ) : W.ψ (2 * m) * W.ψ₂ =
W.ψ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.ψ m * W.ψ (m + 2) - W.ψ (m - 2) * W.ψ m * W.ψ (m + 1) ^ 2 :=
normEDS_even ..
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/DivisionPolynomial/Basic.lean | 479 | 482 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem h hs]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self h]
apply Nat.pred_le
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem ncard_exchange {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| encard_exchange ha hb
theorem ncard_exchange' {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
(insert a s \ {b}).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_exchange ha hb, ← singleton_union, ← singleton_union, union_diff_distrib,
@diff_singleton_eq_self _ b {a} fun h ↦ ha (by rwa [← mem_singleton_iff.mp h])]
lemma odd_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Odd (insert a s).ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.odd_add]
simp only [Nat.odd_add, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Nat.not_even_one, iff_false, Decidable.not_not]
lemma even_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Even (insert a s).ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.even_add_one, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end InsertErase
variable {f : α → β}
theorem ncard_image_le (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (f '' s).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_image_le
theorem ncard_image_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| H.encard_image
theorem injOn_of_ncard_image_eq (h : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq] at h
exact hs.injOn_of_encard_image_eq h
theorem ncard_image_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(f '' s).ncard = s.ncard ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h ↦ injOn_of_ncard_image_eq h hs, ncard_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem ncard_image_of_injective (s : Set α) (H : f.Injective) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
theorem ncard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range {s : Set β} (H : f.Injective)
(hs : s ⊆ Set.range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injective _ H, image_preimage_eq_iff.mpr hs]
theorem fiber_ncard_ne_zero_iff_mem_image {y : β} (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
{ x ∈ s | f x = y }.ncard ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ f '' s := by
refine ⟨nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact @ncard_ne_zero_of_mem _ ({ x ∈ s | f x = f z }) z (mem_sep hz rfl)
(hs.subset (sep_subset _ _))
@[simp] theorem ncard_map (f : α ↪ β) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injective _ f.inj'
@[simp] theorem ncard_subtype (P : α → Prop) (s : Set α) :
{ x : Subtype P | (x : α) ∈ s }.ncard = (s ∩ setOf P).ncard := by
convert (ncard_image_of_injective _ (@Subtype.coe_injective _ P)).symm
ext x
simp [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right]
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_left (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_left hs
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_right (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ t.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_right ht
theorem eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (h : s ⊆ t) (h' : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s = t :=
ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' h
(by rwa [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq] at h')
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_ncard_le (h : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst ↦ eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hst h ht, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (h : f '' s ⊆ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
f '' s = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le h (ncard_map _).ge hs
theorem sep_of_ncard_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : { x ∈ s | P x }.ncard = s.ncard) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : P a :=
sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true.mp (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (by simp) h.symm.le hs) _ ha
theorem ncard_lt_ncard (h : s ⊂ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard < t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h.subset).cast_ncard_eq]
exact (ht.subset h.subset).encard_lt_encard h
theorem ncard_strictMono [Finite α] : @StrictMono (Set α) _ _ _ ncard :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ncard_lt_ncard h
theorem ncard_eq_of_bijective {n : ℕ} (f : ∀ i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀ (i) (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i j) (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.ncard = n := by
let f' : Fin n → α := fun i ↦ f i.val i.is_lt
suffices himage : s = f' '' Set.univ by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Set.ncard_univ, himage]
exact ncard_image_of_injOn <| fun i _hi j _hj h ↦ Fin.ext <| f_inj i.val j.val i.is_lt j.is_lt h
ext x
simp only [image_univ, mem_range]
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ?_, fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ hf' i hi⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
use ⟨i, hi⟩
theorem ncard_congr {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.ncard = t.ncard := by
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, h₁ _ _⟩
have hbij : f'.Bijective := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
exact h₂ _ _ hx hy hxy
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h₃ y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f' hbij)
theorem ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : InjOn f s)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
have hle := encard_le_encard_of_injOn hf f_inj
to_encard_tac; rwa [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.finite_of_encard_le hle).cast_ncard_eq]
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_ncard_lt_of_maps_to {t : Set β} (hc : t.ncard < s.ncard) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
by_contra h'
simp only [Ne, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not] at h'
exact (ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn f hf h' ht).not_lt hc
theorem le_ncard_of_inj_on_range {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
n ≤ s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs]
apply Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range <;> simpa
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
intro b hb
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have finj : f'.Injective := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
apply hinj _ _ hx hy hxy
have hft := ht.fintype
have hft' := Fintype.ofInjective f' finj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
convert @Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f'' _ _ _ _ (by simpa) using 1
· simp [f'']
· simp [f'', hf]
· intros a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h
rw [mem_toFinset] at ha₁ ha₂
exact hinj _ _ ha₁ ha₂ h
rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
a₁ = a₂ := by
classical
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have hsurj : f'.Surjective := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hsurj y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
haveI := hs.fintype
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective _ hsurj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
exact
@Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f''
(fun a ha ↦ by { rw [mem_toFinset] at ha ⊢; exact hf a ha }) (by simpa)
(by { rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card'] }) a₁
(by simpa) a₂ (by simpa) (by simpa)
@[simp] theorem ncard_coe {α : Type*} (s : Set α) :
Set.ncard (Set.univ : Set (Set.Elem s)) = s.ncard :=
Set.ncard_congr (fun a ha ↦ ↑a) (fun a ha ↦ a.prop) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma ncard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : (s.graphOn f).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
section Lattice
theorem ncard_union_add_ncard_inter (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard + (s ∩ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq,
(hs.subset inter_subset_left).cast_ncard_eq, encard_union_add_encard_inter]
| theorem ncard_inter_add_ncard_union (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∩ t).ncard + (s ∪ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
rw [add_comm, ncard_union_add_ncard_inter _ _ hs ht]
theorem ncard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard + t.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := (s ∪ t).finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac
rw [h.cast_ncard_eq, (h.subset subset_union_left).cast_ncard_eq,
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 850 | 857 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Chris Hughes, Daniel Weber
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiplicity of a divisor
For a commutative monoid, this file introduces the notion of multiplicity of a divisor and proves
several basic results on it.
## Main definitions
* `emultiplicity a b`: for two elements `a` and `b` of a commutative monoid returns the largest
number `n` such that `a ^ n ∣ b` or infinity, written `⊤`, if `a ^ n ∣ b` for all natural numbers
`n`.
* `multiplicity a b`: a `ℕ`-valued version of `multiplicity`, defaulting for `1` instead of `⊤`.
The reason for using `1` as a default value instead of `0` is to have `multiplicity_eq_zero_iff`.
* `FiniteMultiplicity a b`: a predicate denoting that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β : Type*}
open Nat
/-- `multiplicity.Finite a b` indicates that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite. -/
abbrev FiniteMultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite := FiniteMultiplicity
open scoped Classical in
/-- `emultiplicity a b` returns the largest natural number `n` such that
`a ^ n ∣ b`, as an `ℕ∞`. If `∀ n, a ^ n ∣ b` then it returns `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def emultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ∞ :=
if h : FiniteMultiplicity a b then Nat.find h else ⊤
/-- A `ℕ`-valued version of `emultiplicity`, returning `1` instead of `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def multiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ :=
(emultiplicity a b).untopD 1
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_top :
emultiplicity a b = ⊤ ↔ ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_lt_top {a b : α} : emultiplicity a b < ⊤ ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, emultiplicity_eq_top]
theorem finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top :
FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ emultiplicity a b ≠ ⊤ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top := finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
alias ⟨FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top, _⟩ := finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-08")]
alias Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
by_contra! nh
rw [← emultiplicity_eq_top, h] at nh
trivial
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast := finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [multiplicity, h]
rfl
theorem emultiplicity_ne_of_multiplicity_ne {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b ≠ n → emultiplicity a b ≠ n :=
mt multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
emultiplicity a b = multiplicity a b := by
cases hm : emultiplicity a b
· simp [h] at hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some hm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq
theorem emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
constructor
· exact multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
· intro h₂
simpa [multiplicity, WithTop.untopD_eq_iff, h] using h₂
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ multiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity (h : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b = 1 := by
simp [multiplicity, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finite :=
multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_le_emultiplicity :
multiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· simp [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· simp [hf, emultiplicity_eq_top.2]
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq {c d : β}
(h : emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d) : multiplicity a b = multiplicity c d := by
unfold multiplicity
rw [h]
theorem multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b ≤ n) :
multiplicity a b ≤ n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b ≤ n) : emultiplicity a b ≤ n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ multiplicity a b) :
n ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_mono h).trans multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ emultiplicity a b) : n ≤ multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity
theorem multiplicity_lt_of_emultiplicity_lt {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b < n) :
multiplicity a b < n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans_lt h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b < n) : emultiplicity a b < n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n < multiplicity a b) :
n < emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_strictMono h).trans_le multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n < emultiplicity a b) : n < multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_pos_iff :
0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ 0 < multiplicity a b := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.def : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite.def := FiniteMultiplicity.def
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right : FiniteMultiplicity a 1 → ¬a ∣ 1 :=
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ => hn ⟨d ^ (n + 1), (pow_mul_pow_eq_one (n + 1) hd.symm).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_dvd_of_one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_emultiplicity (a b : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = emultiplicity a b := by
unfold emultiplicity FiniteMultiplicity
congr! <;> norm_cast
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_multiplicity (a b : ℕ) : multiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (natCast_emultiplicity a b)
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b :=
⟨fun h n =>
Nat.casesOn n
(by
rw [_root_.pow_zero]
exact one_dvd _)
(by simpa [FiniteMultiplicity] using h),
by simp [FiniteMultiplicity, multiplicity]; tauto⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_iff_forall := FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : ¬IsUnit a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
hn ∘ IsUnit.dvd ∘ IsUnit.pow (n + 1)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_unit := FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left {c : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c) → FiniteMultiplicity a b := fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, fun h => hn (h.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _))⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_left := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ emultiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := by classical
cases k
· simp
unfold emultiplicity at hk
split at hk
· norm_cast at hk
simpa using (Nat.find_min _ (lt_of_succ_le hk))
· apply FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp ‹_›
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ multiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity hk)
@[simp]
theorem pow_multiplicity_dvd (a b : α) : a ^ (multiplicity a b) ∣ b :=
pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity le_rfl
theorem not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt {m : ℕ} (hm : emultiplicity a b < m) :
¬a ^ m ∣ b := fun nh => by
unfold emultiplicity at hm
split at hm
· simp only [cast_lt, find_lt_iff] at hm
obtain ⟨n, hn1, hn2⟩ := hm
exact hn2 ((pow_dvd_pow _ hn1).trans nh)
· simp at hm
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {m : ℕ}
(hm : multiplicity a b < m) : ¬a ^ m ∣ b := by
apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
norm_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem multiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < multiplicity a b := by
refine Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h => ?_
simpa [hdiv] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(by by_contra! nh; simp [nh] at h) (lt_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem emultiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < emultiplicity a b :=
lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hdiv)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
emultiplicity a b = k := by classical
have : FiniteMultiplicity a b := ⟨k, hsucc⟩
simp only [emultiplicity, this, ↓reduceDIte, Nat.cast_inj, find_eq_iff, hsucc, not_false_eq_true,
Decidable.not_not, true_and]
exact fun n hn ↦ (pow_dvd_pow _ hn).trans hk
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
multiplicity a b = k :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some (emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd hk hsucc)
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) :
k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
le_of_not_gt fun hk' => not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt hk' hk
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) : k ≤ multiplicity a b :=
hf.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hk)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd
theorem pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
⟨le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity⟩
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ multiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity ▸ pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity, not_le]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [hf.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, not_le]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_eq_coe {n : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
simp [h]
· apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [h]
norm_cast
simp
· rw [and_imp]
apply emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
simp [← emultiplicity_eq_coe, hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_ofNat {a b n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
emultiplicity a b = (ofNat(n) : ℕ∞) ↔ a ^ ofNat(n) ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (ofNat(n) + 1) ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_eq_coe
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_eq_iff := FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left (b : α) (ha : IsUnit a) : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b :=
(·.not_unit ha)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_isUnit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left (b : α) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity 1 b := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_one_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_one_left (b : α) : emultiplicity 1 b = ⊤ :=
emultiplicity_eq_top.2 (FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left _)
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.one_right (ha : FiniteMultiplicity a 1) : multiplicity a 1 = 0 := by
simp [ha.multiplicity_eq_iff, ha.not_dvd_of_one_right]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.one_right
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left (a : α) (u : αˣ) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity (u : α) a :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left a u.isUnit
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_unit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· rw [← ENat.coe_zero, emultiplicity_eq_coe]
simp
· simpa [emultiplicity_eq_top.2 hf] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.1 hf 1
theorem multiplicity_eq_zero :
multiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b :=
(emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one).symm.trans emultiplicity_eq_zero
theorem emultiplicity_ne_zero :
emultiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem multiplicity_ne_zero :
multiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
∃ c : α, b = a ^ multiplicity a b * c ∧ ¬a ∣ c := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := pow_multiplicity_dvd a b
refine ⟨c, hc, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [hk, ← mul_assoc, ← _root_.pow_succ] at hc
have h₁ : a ^ (multiplicity a b + 1) ∣ b := ⟨k, hc⟩
exact (hfin.multiplicity_eq_iff.1 (by simp)).2 h₁
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by classical
constructor
· exact fun h n hab ↦ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_trans (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hab) h)
· intro h
unfold emultiplicity
-- aesop? says
split
next h_1 =>
obtain ⟨w, h_1⟩ := h_1
split
next h_2 =>
simp_all only [cast_le, le_find_iff, lt_find_iff, Decidable.not_not, le_refl,
not_true_eq_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
next h_2 => simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, le_top]
next h_1 =>
simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, not_true_eq_false, top_le_iff,
dite_eq_right_iff, ENat.coe_ne_top, imp_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff {c d : β} (hab : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
(hcd : FiniteMultiplicity c d) :
multiplicity a b ≤ multiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, ENat.some_eq_coe, ← hab.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity,
← hcd.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff
theorem emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b ↔ c ^ n ∣ d :=
⟨fun h n =>
⟨emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.le n, emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.ge n⟩,
fun h => le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mp)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mpr)⟩
theorem le_emultiplicity_map {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity (f a) (f b) :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n ↦ by rw [← map_pow]; exact map_dvd f
theorem emultiplicity_map_eq {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} : emultiplicity (f a) (f b) = emultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff, ← map_pow, map_dvd_iff]
theorem multiplicity_map_eq {F : Type*} [EquivLike F α β] [MulEquivClass F α β]
(f : F) {a b : α} : multiplicity (f a) (f b) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_map_eq f)
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right {a b c : α} (h : b ∣ c) :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a c :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun _ hb => hb.trans h
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_right {a b c : α} (h : Associated b c) :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity a c :=
le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right h.dvd)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_right h.symm.dvd)
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_associated_right {a b c : α} (h : Associated b c) :
multiplicity a b = multiplicity a c :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_right h)
theorem dvd_of_emultiplicity_pos {a b : α} (h : 0 < emultiplicity a b) : a ∣ b :=
pow_one a ▸ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (Order.add_one_le_of_lt h)
theorem dvd_of_multiplicity_pos {a b : α} (h : 0 < multiplicity a b) : a ∣ b :=
dvd_of_emultiplicity_pos (lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity h)
theorem dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos {a b : α} : 0 < multiplicity a b ↔ a ∣ b :=
⟨dvd_of_multiplicity_pos, fun hdvd => Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (by simpa [multiplicity_eq_zero])⟩
theorem dvd_iff_emultiplicity_pos {a b : α} : 0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ a ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_pos_iff.trans dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos
theorem Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff {a b : ℕ} : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ a ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall, not_and_or, not_ne_iff, not_lt,
Nat.le_zero]
exact
⟨fun h =>
or_iff_not_imp_right.2 fun hb =>
have ha : a ≠ 0 := fun ha => hb <| zero_dvd_iff.mp <| by rw [ha] at h; exact h 1
Classical.by_contradiction fun ha1 : a ≠ 1 =>
have ha_gt_one : 1 < a :=
lt_of_not_ge fun _ =>
match a with
| 0 => ha rfl
| 1 => ha1 rfl
| b+2 => by omega
not_lt_of_ge (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hb) (h b)) (b.lt_pow_self ha_gt_one),
fun h => by cases h <;> simp [*]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias Nat.multiplicity_finite_iff := Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff
alias ⟨_, Dvd.multiplicity_pos⟩ := dvd_iff_multiplicity_pos
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_right {a b c : α} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c)) :
FiniteMultiplicity a c := (mul_comm b c ▸ hf).mul_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_right := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_right
theorem emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a)
(hb : IsUnit b) : emultiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_zero.mpr fun h ↦ ha (isUnit_of_dvd_unit h hb)
theorem multiplicity_of_isUnit_right {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a)
(hb : IsUnit b) : multiplicity a b = 0 :=
multiplicity_eq_zero.mpr fun h ↦ ha (isUnit_of_dvd_unit h hb)
theorem emultiplicity_of_one_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) : emultiplicity a 1 = 0 :=
emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha isUnit_one
theorem multiplicity_of_one_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) : multiplicity a 1 = 0 :=
multiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha isUnit_one
theorem emultiplicity_of_unit_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) (u : αˣ) : emultiplicity a u = 0 :=
emultiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha u.isUnit
theorem multiplicity_of_unit_right {a : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) (u : αˣ) : multiplicity a u = 0 :=
multiplicity_of_isUnit_right ha u.isUnit
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left {a b c : α} (hdvd : a ∣ b) :
emultiplicity b c ≤ emultiplicity a c :=
emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n h => (pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd hdvd n).trans h
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_left {a b c : α} (h : Associated a b) :
emultiplicity b c = emultiplicity a c :=
le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left h.dvd)
(emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_of_dvd_left h.symm.dvd)
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_associated_left {a b c : α} (h : Associated a b) :
multiplicity b c = multiplicity a c :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (emultiplicity_eq_of_associated_left h)
theorem emultiplicity_mk_eq_emultiplicity {a b : α} :
emultiplicity (Associates.mk a) (Associates.mk b) = emultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff, ← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk]
end CommMonoid
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.ne_zero {a b : α} (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
fun hb => by simp [hb] at hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.ne_zero := FiniteMultiplicity.ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_zero (a : α) : emultiplicity a 0 = ⊤ :=
emultiplicity_eq_top.2 (fun v ↦ v.ne_zero rfl)
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_zero_eq_zero_of_ne_zero (a : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) : emultiplicity 0 a = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_zero.2 <| mt zero_dvd_iff.1 ha
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_zero_eq_zero_of_ne_zero (a : α) (ha : a ≠ 0) : multiplicity 0 a = 0 :=
multiplicity_eq_zero.2 <| mt zero_dvd_iff.1 ha
end MonoidWithZero
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.or_of_add {p a b : α} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity p (a + b)) :
FiniteMultiplicity p a ∨ FiniteMultiplicity p b := by
by_contra! nh
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := hf
simp_all [dvd_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.or_of_add := FiniteMultiplicity.or_of_add
theorem min_le_emultiplicity_add {p a b : α} :
min (emultiplicity p a) (emultiplicity p b) ≤ emultiplicity p (a + b) := by
cases hm : min (emultiplicity p a) (emultiplicity p b)
· simp only [top_le_iff, min_eq_top, emultiplicity_eq_top] at hm ⊢
contrapose hm
simp only [not_and_or, not_not] at hm ⊢
exact hm.or_of_add
· apply le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd
simp [dvd_add, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity, ← hm]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring α]
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.neg_iff {a b : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (-b) ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
unfold FiniteMultiplicity
congr! 3
simp only [dvd_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.neg_iff := FiniteMultiplicity.neg_iff
alias ⟨_, FiniteMultiplicity.neg⟩ := FiniteMultiplicity.neg_iff
| @[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.neg := FiniteMultiplicity.neg
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_neg (a b : α) : emultiplicity a (-b) = emultiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff]
simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 638 | 646 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# The complex numbers
The complex numbers are modelled as ℝ^2 in the obvious way and it is shown that they form a field
of characteristic zero. The result that the complex numbers are algebraically closed, see
`FieldTheory.AlgebraicClosure`.
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset Algebra
open Set Function
/-! ### Definition and basic arithmetic -/
/-- Complex numbers consist of two `Real`s: a real part `re` and an imaginary part `im`. -/
structure Complex : Type where
/-- The real part of a complex number. -/
re : ℝ
/-- The imaginary part of a complex number. -/
im : ℝ
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℂ" => Complex
namespace Complex
open ComplexConjugate
noncomputable instance : DecidableEq ℂ :=
Classical.decEq _
/-- The equivalence between the complex numbers and `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivRealProd : ℂ ≃ ℝ × ℝ where
toFun z := ⟨z.re, z.im⟩
invFun p := ⟨p.1, p.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ z : ℂ, Complex.mk z.re z.im = z
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
-- We only mark this lemma with `ext` *locally* to avoid it applying whenever terms of `ℂ` appear.
theorem ext : ∀ {z w : ℂ}, z.re = w.re → z.im = w.im → z = w
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
attribute [local ext] Complex.ext
lemma «forall» {p : ℂ → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ∀ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ := by aesop
lemma «exists» {p : ℂ → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ∃ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ := by aesop
theorem re_surjective : Surjective re := fun x => ⟨⟨x, 0⟩, rfl⟩
theorem im_surjective : Surjective im := fun y => ⟨⟨0, y⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_re : range re = univ :=
re_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_im : range im = univ :=
im_surjective.range_eq
/-- The natural inclusion of the real numbers into the complex numbers. -/
@[coe]
def ofReal (r : ℝ) : ℂ :=
⟨r, 0⟩
instance : Coe ℝ ℂ :=
⟨ofReal⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_re (r : ℝ) : Complex.re (r : ℂ) = r :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_im (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem ofReal_def (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ) = ⟨r, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = w ↔ z = w :=
⟨congrArg re, by apply congrArg⟩
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) := fun _ _ => congrArg re
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℝ (↑) fun z => z.im = 0 where
prf z hz := ⟨z.re, ext rfl hz.symm⟩
/-- The product of a set on the real axis and a set on the imaginary axis of the complex plane,
denoted by `s ×ℂ t`. -/
def reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : Set ℂ :=
re ⁻¹' s ∩ im ⁻¹' t
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-03")] protected alias Set.reProdIm := reProdIm
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:72 " ×ℂ " => reProdIm
theorem mem_reProdIm {z : ℂ} {s t : Set ℝ} : z ∈ s ×ℂ t ↔ z.re ∈ s ∧ z.im ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
instance : Zero ℂ :=
⟨(0 : ℝ)⟩
instance : Inhabited ℂ :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℂ).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
ofReal_inj
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_zero
instance : One ℂ :=
⟨(1 : ℝ)⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℂ).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 1 ↔ z = 1 :=
ofReal_inj
theorem ofReal_ne_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 1 ↔ z ≠ 1 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_one
instance : Add ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re + w.re, z.im + w.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
-- replaced by `re_ofNat`
-- replaced by `im_ofNat`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r + s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
-- replaced by `Complex.ofReal_ofNat`
instance : Neg ℂ :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.re, -z.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℂ) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℂ) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : ℂ) = -r :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
instance : Sub ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re - w.re, z.im - w.im⟩⟩
instance : Mul ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im, z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r * s :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).re = r * z.re := by simp [ofReal]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).im = r * z.im := by simp [ofReal]
lemma re_mul_ofReal (z : ℂ) (r : ℝ) : (z * r).re = z.re * r := by simp [ofReal]
lemma im_mul_ofReal (z : ℂ) (r : ℝ) : (z * r).im = z.im * r := by simp [ofReal]
theorem ofReal_mul' (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : ↑r * z = ⟨r * z.re, r * z.im⟩ :=
ext (re_ofReal_mul _ _) (im_ofReal_mul _ _)
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
def I : ℂ :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem I_re : I.re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem I_im : I.im = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem I_mul_I : I * I = -1 :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
theorem I_mul (z : ℂ) : I * z = ⟨-z.im, z.re⟩ :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp
@[simp] lemma I_ne_zero : (I : ℂ) ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) zero_ne_one.symm
theorem mk_eq_add_mul_I (a b : ℝ) : Complex.mk a b = a + b * I :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem re_add_im (z : ℂ) : (z.re : ℂ) + z.im * I = z :=
Complex.ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal]
theorem mul_I_re (z : ℂ) : (z * I).re = -z.im := by simp
theorem mul_I_im (z : ℂ) : (z * I).im = z.re := by simp
theorem I_mul_re (z : ℂ) : (I * z).re = -z.im := by simp
theorem I_mul_im (z : ℂ) : (I * z).im = z.re := by simp
@[simp]
theorem equivRealProd_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) : equivRealProd.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * I := by
ext <;> simp [Complex.equivRealProd, ofReal]
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Basic.lean | 268 | 268 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Newell Jensen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Newell Jensen, Mitchell Lee, Óscar Álvarez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Matrix
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PresentedGroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.DivMod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
/-!
# Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems
This file defines Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems.
Let `B` be a (possibly infinite) type, and let $M = (M_{i,i'})_{i, i' \in B}$ be a matrix
of natural numbers. Further assume that $M$ is a *Coxeter matrix* (`CoxeterMatrix`); that is, $M$ is
symmetric and $M_{i,i'} = 1$ if and only if $i = i'$. The *Coxeter group* associated to $M$
(`CoxeterMatrix.group`) has the presentation
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$
The elements $s_i$ are called the *simple reflections* (`CoxeterMatrix.simple`) of the Coxeter
group. Note that every simple reflection is an involution.
A *Coxeter system* (`CoxeterSystem`) is a group $W$, together with an isomorphism between $W$ and
the Coxeter group associated to some Coxeter matrix $M$. By abuse of language, we also say that $W$
is a Coxeter group (`IsCoxeterGroup`), and we may speak of the simple reflections $s_i \in W$
(`CoxeterSystem.simple`). We state all of our results about Coxeter groups in terms of Coxeter
systems where possible.
Let $W$ be a group equipped with a Coxeter system. For all monoids $G$ and all functions
$f \colon B \to G$ whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations, we may lift $f$ to a multiplicative
homomorphism $W \to G$ (`CoxeterSystem.lift`) in a unique way.
A *word* is a sequence of elements of $B$. The word $(i_1, \ldots, i_\ell)$ has a corresponding
product $s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell} \in W$ (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd`). Every element of $W$ is the
product of some word (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd_surjective`). The words that alternate between two
elements of $B$ (`CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`) are particularly important.
## Implementation details
Much of the literature on Coxeter groups conflates the set $S = \{s_i : i \in B\} \subseteq W$ of
simple reflections with the set $B$ that indexes the simple reflections. This is usually permissible
because the simple reflections $s_i$ of any Coxeter group are all distinct (a nontrivial fact that
we do not prove in this file). In contrast, we try not to refer to the set $S$ of simple
reflections unless necessary; instead, we state our results in terms of $B$ wherever possible.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterMatrix.Group`
* `CoxeterSystem`
* `IsCoxeterGroup`
* `CoxeterSystem.simple` : If `cs` is a Coxeter system on the group `W`, then `cs.simple i` is the
simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.lift` : Extend a function `f : B → G` to a monoid homomorphism `f' : W → G`
satisfying `f' (cs.simple i) = f i` for all `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.wordProd`
* `CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 4--6*](bourbaki1968) chapter IV
pages 4--5, 13--15
* [J. Baez, *Coxeter and Dynkin Diagrams*](https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/twf_dynkin.pdf)
## TODO
* The simple reflections of a Coxeter system are distinct.
* Introduce some ways to actually construct some Coxeter groups. For example, given a Coxeter matrix
$M : B \times B \to \mathbb{N}$, a real vector space $V$, a basis $\{\alpha_i : i \in B\}$
and a bilinear form $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \colon V \times V \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying
$$\langle \alpha_i, \alpha_{i'}\rangle = - \cos(\pi / M_{i,i'}),$$ one can form the subgroup of
$GL(V)$ generated by the reflections in the $\alpha_i$, and it is a Coxeter group. We can use this
to combinatorially describe the Coxeter groups of type $A$, $B$, $D$, and $I$.
* State and prove Matsumoto's theorem.
* Classify the finite Coxeter groups.
## Tags
coxeter system, coxeter group
-/
open Function Set List
/-! ### Coxeter groups -/
namespace CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (e : B ≃ B')
/-- The Coxeter relation associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$ and two indices $i, i' \in B$.
That is, the relation $(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}$, considered as an element of the free group
on $\{s_i\}_{i \in B}$.
If $M_{i, i'} = 0$, then this is the identity, indicating that there is no relation between
$s_i$ and $s_{i'}$. -/
def relation (i i' : B) : FreeGroup B := (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i'
/-- The set of all Coxeter relations associated to the Coxeter matrix $M$. -/
def relationsSet : Set (FreeGroup B) := range <| uncurry M.relation
/-- The Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$; that is, the group
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$ -/
protected def Group : Type _ := PresentedGroup M.relationsSet
instance : Group M.Group := QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _
/-- The simple reflection of the Coxeter group `M.group` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : M.Group := PresentedGroup.of i
theorem reindex_relationsSet :
(M.reindex e).relationsSet =
FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e '' M.relationsSet := let M' := M.reindex e; calc
Set.range (uncurry M'.relation)
_ = Set.range (uncurry M'.relation ∘ Prod.map e e) := by simp [Set.range_comp]
_ = Set.range (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e ∘ uncurry M.relation) := by
apply congrArg Set.range
ext ⟨i, i'⟩
simp [relation, reindex_apply, M']
_ = _ := by simp [Set.range_comp, relationsSet]
/-- The isomorphism between the Coxeter group associated to the reindexed matrix `M.reindex e` and
the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def reindexGroupEquiv : (M.reindex e).Group ≃* M.Group :=
.symm <| QuotientGroup.congr
(Subgroup.normalClosure M.relationsSet)
(Subgroup.normalClosure (M.reindex e).relationsSet)
(FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e)
(by
rw [reindex_relationsSet,
Subgroup.map_normalClosure _ _ (by simpa using (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e).surjective),
MonoidHom.coe_coe])
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_apply_simple (i : B') :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e) ((M.reindex e).simple i) = M.simple (e.symm i) := rfl
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_symm_apply_simple (i : B) :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm (M.simple i) = (M.reindex e).simple (e i) := rfl
end CoxeterMatrix
/-! ### Coxeter systems -/
section
variable {B : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B)
/-- A Coxeter system `CoxeterSystem M W` is a structure recording the isomorphism between
a group `W` and the Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
@[ext]
structure CoxeterSystem (W : Type*) [Group W] where
/-- The isomorphism between `W` and the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
mulEquiv : W ≃* M.Group
/-- A group is a Coxeter group if it admits a Coxeter system for some Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
class IsCoxeterGroup.{u} (W : Type u) [Group W] : Prop where
nonempty_system : ∃ B : Type u, ∃ M : CoxeterMatrix B, Nonempty (CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- The canonical Coxeter system on the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem : CoxeterSystem M M.Group := ⟨.refl _⟩
end
namespace CoxeterSystem
open CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (e : B ≃ B')
variable {W H : Type*} [Group W] [Group H]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- Reindex a Coxeter system through a bijection of the indexing sets. -/
@[simps]
protected def reindex (e : B ≃ B') : CoxeterSystem (M.reindex e) W :=
⟨cs.mulEquiv.trans (M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm⟩
/-- Push a Coxeter system through a group isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (e : W ≃* H) : CoxeterSystem M H := ⟨e.symm.trans cs.mulEquiv⟩
/-! ### Simple reflections -/
/-- The simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : W := cs.mulEquiv.symm (PresentedGroup.of i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem_simple (M : CoxeterMatrix B) :
M.toCoxeterSystem.simple = M.simple := rfl
@[simp] theorem reindex_simple (i' : B') : (cs.reindex e).simple i' = cs.simple (e.symm i') := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_simple (e : W ≃* H) (i : B) : (cs.map e).simple i = e (cs.simple i) := rfl
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_self (i : B) : s i * s i = 1 := by
have : (FreeGroup.of i) * (FreeGroup.of i) ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i), by simp [relation]⟩
have : (PresentedGroup.mk _ (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i) : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, PresentedGroup.of, map_mul]
exact map_mul_eq_one cs.mulEquiv.symm this
| @[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_cancel_right {w : W} (i : B) : w * s i * s i = w := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean | 208 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 709 | 709 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Arthur Paulino. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Graph Coloring
This module defines colorings of simple graphs (also known as proper colorings in the literature).
A graph coloring is the attribution of "colors" to all of its vertices such that adjacent vertices
have different colors.
A coloring can be represented as a homomorphism into a complete graph, whose vertices represent
the colors.
## Main definitions
* `G.Coloring α` is the type of `α`-colorings of a simple graph `G`,
with `α` being the set of available colors. The type is defined to
be homomorphisms from `G` into the complete graph on `α`, and
colorings have a coercion to `V → α`.
* `G.Colorable n` is the proposition that `G` is `n`-colorable, which
is whether there exists a coloring with at most *n* colors.
* `G.chromaticNumber` is the minimal `n` such that `G` is `n`-colorable,
or `⊤` if it cannot be colored with finitely many colors.
(Cardinal-valued chromatic numbers are more niche, so we stick to `ℕ∞`.)
We write `G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤` to mean a graph is colorable with finitely many colors.
* `C.colorClass c` is the set of vertices colored by `c : α` in the coloring `C : G.Coloring α`.
* `C.colorClasses` is the set containing all color classes.
## TODO
* Gather material from:
* https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/blob/simple_graph_matching/src/combinatorics/simple_graph/coloring.lean
* https://github.com/kmill/lean-graphcoloring/blob/master/src/graph.lean
* Trees
* Planar graphs
* Chromatic polynomials
* develop API for partial colorings, likely as colorings of subgraphs (`H.coe.Coloring α`)
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Fintype Function
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {n : ℕ}
/-- An `α`-coloring of a simple graph `G` is a homomorphism of `G` into the complete graph on `α`.
This is also known as a proper coloring.
-/
abbrev Coloring (α : Type v) := G →g (⊤ : SimpleGraph α)
variable {G}
variable {α β : Type*} (C : G.Coloring α)
theorem Coloring.valid {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) : C v ≠ C w :=
C.map_rel h
/-- Construct a term of `SimpleGraph.Coloring` using a function that
assigns vertices to colors and a proof that it is as proper coloring.
(Note: this is a definitionally the constructor for `SimpleGraph.Hom`,
but with a syntactically better proper coloring hypothesis.)
-/
@[match_pattern]
def Coloring.mk (color : V → α) (valid : ∀ {v w : V}, G.Adj v w → color v ≠ color w) :
G.Coloring α :=
⟨color, @valid⟩
/-- The color class of a given color.
-/
def Coloring.colorClass (c : α) : Set V := { v : V | C v = c }
/-- The set containing all color classes. -/
def Coloring.colorClasses : Set (Set V) := (Setoid.ker C).classes
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClass (v : V) : v ∈ C.colorClass (C v) := rfl
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition : Setoid.IsPartition C.colorClasses :=
Setoid.isPartition_classes (Setoid.ker C)
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClasses {v : V} : C.colorClass (C v) ∈ C.colorClasses :=
⟨v, rfl⟩
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_finite [Finite α] : C.colorClasses.Finite :=
Setoid.finite_classes_ker _
theorem Coloring.card_colorClasses_le [Fintype α] [Fintype C.colorClasses] :
Fintype.card C.colorClasses ≤ Fintype.card α := by
simp only [colorClasses]
convert Setoid.card_classes_ker_le C
theorem Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass {c : α} {v w : V} (hv : v ∈ C.colorClass c)
(hw : w ∈ C.colorClass c) : ¬G.Adj v w := fun h => C.valid h (Eq.trans hv (Eq.symm hw))
theorem Coloring.color_classes_independent (c : α) : IsAntichain G.Adj (C.colorClass c) :=
fun _ hv _ hw _ => C.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass hv hw
-- TODO make this computable
noncomputable instance [Fintype V] [Fintype α] : Fintype (Coloring G α) := by
classical
change Fintype (RelHom G.Adj (⊤ : SimpleGraph α).Adj)
apply Fintype.ofInjective _ RelHom.coe_fn_injective
variable (G)
/-- Whether a graph can be colored by at most `n` colors. -/
def Colorable (n : ℕ) : Prop := Nonempty (G.Coloring (Fin n))
/-- The coloring of an empty graph. -/
def coloringOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty V] : G.Coloring α :=
Coloring.mk isEmptyElim fun {v} => isEmptyElim v
theorem colorable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty V] (n : ℕ) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨G.coloringOfIsEmpty⟩
theorem isEmpty_of_colorable_zero (h : G.Colorable 0) : IsEmpty V := by
constructor
intro v
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.some v
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ hi
@[simp]
lemma colorable_zero_iff : G.Colorable 0 ↔ IsEmpty V :=
⟨G.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero, fun _ ↦ G.colorable_of_isEmpty 0⟩
/-- The "tautological" coloring of a graph, using the vertices of the graph as colors. -/
def selfColoring : G.Coloring V := Coloring.mk id fun {_ _} => G.ne_of_adj
/-- The chromatic number of a graph is the minimal number of colors needed to color it.
This is `⊤` (infinity) iff `G` isn't colorable with finitely many colors.
If `G` is colorable, then `ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber` is the `ℕ`-valued chromatic number. -/
noncomputable def chromaticNumber : ℕ∞ := ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞)
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_biInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞) := rfl
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_iInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) := by
rw [chromaticNumber, iInf_subtype]
lemma Colorable.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf {G : SimpleGraph V} {n} (h : G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber = sInf {n' : ℕ | G.Colorable n'} := by
rw [ENat.coe_sInf, chromaticNumber]
exact ⟨_, h⟩
/-- Given an embedding, there is an induced embedding of colorings. -/
def recolorOfEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β where
toFun C := (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C
inj' := by -- this was strangely painful; seems like missing lemmas about embeddings
intro C C' h
dsimp only at h
ext v
apply (Embedding.completeGraph f).inj'
change ((Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C) v = _
rw [h]
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfEmbedding f) = (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp := rfl
/-- Given an equivalence, there is an induced equivalence between colorings. -/
def recolorOfEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α ≃ β) : G.Coloring α ≃ G.Coloring β where
toFun := G.recolorOfEmbedding f.toEmbedding
invFun := G.recolorOfEmbedding f.symm.toEmbedding
left_inv C := by
ext v
apply Equiv.symm_apply_apply
right_inv C := by
ext v
apply Equiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfEquiv (f : α ≃ β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfEquiv f) = (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp := rfl
/-- There is a noncomputable embedding of `α`-colorings to `β`-colorings if
`β` has at least as large a cardinality as `α`. -/
noncomputable def recolorOfCardLE {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
(hn : Fintype.card α ≤ Fintype.card β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β :=
G.recolorOfEmbedding <| (Function.Embedding.nonempty_of_card_le hn).some
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfCardLE [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (hαβ : card α ≤ card β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfCardLE hαβ) =
(Embedding.completeGraph (Embedding.nonempty_of_card_le hαβ).some).toHom.comp := rfl
variable {G}
theorem Colorable.mono {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) (hc : G.Colorable n) : G.Colorable m :=
⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simp [h]) hc.some⟩
theorem Coloring.colorable [Fintype α] (C : G.Coloring α) : G.Colorable (Fintype.card α) :=
⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simp) C⟩
theorem colorable_of_fintype (G : SimpleGraph V) [Fintype V] : G.Colorable (Fintype.card V) :=
G.selfColoring.colorable
/-- Noncomputably get a coloring from colorability. -/
noncomputable def Colorable.toColoring [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n)
(hn : n ≤ Fintype.card α) : G.Coloring α := by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n] at hn
exact G.recolorOfCardLE hn hc.some
theorem Colorable.of_embedding {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'} (f : G ↪g G') {n : ℕ}
(h : G'.Colorable n) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨(h.toColoring (by simp)).comp f⟩
theorem colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring (n : ℕ) :
G.Colorable n ↔ ∃ C : G.Coloring ℕ, ∀ v, C v < n := by
constructor
· rintro hc
have C : G.Coloring (Fin n) := hc.toColoring (by simp)
let f := Embedding.completeGraph (@Fin.valEmbedding n)
use f.toHom.comp C
intro v
exact Fin.is_lt (C.1 v)
· rintro ⟨C, Cf⟩
refine ⟨Coloring.mk ?_ ?_⟩
· exact fun v => ⟨C v, Cf v⟩
· rintro v w hvw
simp only [Fin.mk_eq_mk, Ne]
exact C.valid hvw
theorem colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) :
{ n : ℕ | G.Colorable n }.Nonempty :=
⟨n, hc⟩
theorem chromaticNumber_bddBelow : BddBelow { n : ℕ | G.Colorable n } :=
⟨0, fun _ _ => zero_le _⟩
theorem Colorable.chromaticNumber_le {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) : G.chromaticNumber ≤ n := by
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf]
norm_cast
apply csInf_le chromaticNumber_bddBelow
exact hc
theorem chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n, G.Colorable n := by
rw [chromaticNumber]
convert_to ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) ≠ ⊤ ↔ _
· rw [iInf_subtype]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, ENat.iInf_coe_lt_top]
simp
theorem chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable {n : ℕ} : G.chromaticNumber ≤ n ↔ G.Colorable n := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Colorable.chromaticNumber_le⟩
have : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤ := (trans h (WithTop.coe_lt_top n)).ne
rw [chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists] at this
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this
rw [hm.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_le] at h
have := Nat.sInf_mem (⟨m, hm⟩ : {n' | G.Colorable n'}.Nonempty)
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at this
exact this.mono h
theorem colorable_chromaticNumber {m : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable m) :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
classical
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.sInf_def]
· apply Nat.find_spec
· exact colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable hc
theorem colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype (G : SimpleGraph V) [Finite V] :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
cases nonempty_fintype V
exact colorable_chromaticNumber G.colorable_of_fintype
theorem chromaticNumber_le_one_of_subsingleton (G : SimpleGraph V) [Subsingleton V] :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable]
refine ⟨Coloring.mk (fun _ => 0) ?_⟩
intros v w
cases Subsingleton.elim v w
simp
theorem chromaticNumber_eq_zero_of_isempty (G : SimpleGraph V) [IsEmpty V] :
G.chromaticNumber = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_zero, chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable]
apply colorable_of_isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_of_chromaticNumber_eq_zero (G : SimpleGraph V) [Finite V]
(h : G.chromaticNumber = 0) : IsEmpty V := by
have h' := G.colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype
rw [h] at h'
exact G.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero h'
theorem chromaticNumber_pos [Nonempty V] {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) : 0 < G.chromaticNumber := by
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_pos]
apply le_csInf (colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable hc)
intro m hm
by_contra h'
simp only [not_le] at h'
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hm.some (Classical.arbitrary V)
have h₁ : i < 0 := lt_of_lt_of_le hi (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h')
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ h₁
theorem colorable_of_chromaticNumber_ne_top (h : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤) :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
rw [chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact colorable_chromaticNumber hn
theorem Colorable.mono_left {G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') {n : ℕ} (hc : G'.Colorable n) :
G.Colorable n :=
⟨hc.some.comp (.ofLE h)⟩
theorem chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
(h : ∀ n, G'.Colorable n → G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ G'.chromaticNumber := by
rw [chromaticNumber, chromaticNumber]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf_iff]
intro m hc
have := h _ hc
rw [← chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable] at this
exact this
theorem chromaticNumber_mono (G' : SimpleGraph V)
(h : G ≤ G') : G.chromaticNumber ≤ G'.chromaticNumber :=
chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp fun _ => Colorable.mono_left h
theorem chromaticNumber_mono_of_embedding {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
(f : G ↪g G') : G.chromaticNumber ≤ G'.chromaticNumber :=
chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp fun _ => Colorable.of_embedding f
lemma card_le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective [Fintype α] :
card α ≤ G.chromaticNumber ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring α, Surjective C := by
refine ⟨fun h C ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [C.colorable.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_le] at h
intro i
by_contra! hi
let D : G.Coloring {a // a ≠ i} := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨C v, hi v⟩, (C.valid · <| congr_arg Subtype.val ·)⟩
classical
exact Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf ((Nat.sub_one_lt_of_lt <| card_pos_iff.2 ⟨i⟩).trans_le h)
⟨G.recolorOfEquiv (equivOfCardEq <| by simp [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]) D⟩
· simp only [chromaticNumber, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf_iff, Nat.cast_le, exists_prop]
rintro i ⟨C⟩
contrapose! h
refine ⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simpa using h.le) C, fun hC ↦ ?_⟩
dsimp at hC
simpa [h.not_le] using Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ hC.of_comp
lemma le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective :
n ≤ G.chromaticNumber ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring (Fin n), Surjective C := by
simp [← card_le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective]
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_card_iff_forall_surjective [Fintype α] (hG : G.Colorable (card α)) :
G.chromaticNumber = card α ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring α, Surjective C := by
rw [← hG.chromaticNumber_le.ge_iff_eq, card_le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective]
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_iff_forall_surjective (hG : G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber = n ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring (Fin n), Surjective C := by
rw [← hG.chromaticNumber_le.ge_iff_eq, le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective]
theorem chromaticNumber_bot [Nonempty V] : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).chromaticNumber = 1 := by
have : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Colorable 1 := ⟨.mk 0 <| by simp⟩
exact this.chromaticNumber_le.antisymm <| Order.one_le_iff_pos.2 <| chromaticNumber_pos this
@[simp]
theorem chromaticNumber_top [Fintype V] : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).chromaticNumber = Fintype.card V := by
rw [chromaticNumber_eq_card_iff_forall_surjective (selfColoring _).colorable]
intro C
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_surjective]
intro v w
contrapose
intro h
exact C.valid h
theorem chromaticNumber_top_eq_top_of_infinite (V : Type*) [Infinite V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).chromaticNumber = ⊤ := by
by_contra hc
rw [← Ne, chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists] at hc
obtain ⟨n, ⟨hn⟩⟩ := hc
exact not_injective_infinite_finite _ hn.injective_of_top_hom
/-- The bicoloring of a complete bipartite graph using whether a vertex
is on the left or on the right. -/
def CompleteBipartiteGraph.bicoloring (V W : Type*) : (completeBipartiteGraph V W).Coloring Bool :=
Coloring.mk (fun v => v.isRight)
(by
intro v w
cases v <;> cases w <;> simp)
theorem CompleteBipartiteGraph.chromaticNumber {V W : Type*} [Nonempty V] [Nonempty W] :
(completeBipartiteGraph V W).chromaticNumber = 2 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, chromaticNumber_eq_iff_forall_surjective
(by simpa using (CompleteBipartiteGraph.bicoloring V W).colorable)]
intro C b
have v := Classical.arbitrary V
have w := Classical.arbitrary W
have h : (completeBipartiteGraph V W).Adj (Sum.inl v) (Sum.inr w) := by simp
by_cases he : C (Sum.inl v) = b
· exact ⟨_, he⟩
by_cases he' : C (Sum.inr w) = b
· exact ⟨_, he'⟩
· simpa using two_lt_card_iff.2 ⟨_, _, _, C.valid h, he, he'⟩
/-! ### Cliques -/
theorem IsClique.card_le_of_coloring {s : Finset V} (h : G.IsClique s) [Fintype α]
(C : G.Coloring α) : s.card ≤ Fintype.card α := by
rw [isClique_iff_induce_eq] at h
have f : G.induce ↑s ↪g G := Embedding.comap (Function.Embedding.subtype fun x => x ∈ ↑s) G
rw [h] at f
convert Fintype.card_le_of_injective _ (C.comp f.toHom).injective_of_top_hom using 1
simp
|
theorem IsClique.card_le_of_colorable {s : Finset V} (h : G.IsClique s) {n : ℕ}
(hc : G.Colorable n) : s.card ≤ n := by
convert h.card_le_of_coloring hc.some
simp
theorem IsClique.card_le_chromaticNumber {s : Finset V} (h : G.IsClique s) :
s.card ≤ G.chromaticNumber := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Coloring.lean | 422 | 429 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul Lezeau, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
/-!
# HomLift
Given a functor `p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮`, this file provides API for expressing the fact that `p(φ) = f`
for given morphisms `φ` and `f`. The reason this API is needed is because, in general, `p.map φ = f`
does not make sense when the domain and/or codomain of `φ` and `f` are not definitionally equal.
## Main definition
Given morphism `φ : a ⟶ b` in `𝒳` and `f : R ⟶ S` in `𝒮`, `p.IsHomLift f φ` is a class, defined
using the auxiliary inductive type `IsHomLiftAux` which expresses the fact that `f = p(φ)`.
We also define a macro `subst_hom_lift p f φ` which can be used to substitute `f` with `p(φ)` in a
goal, this tactic is just short for `obtain ⟨⟩ := Functor.IsHomLift.cond (p:=p) (f:=f) (φ:=φ)`, and
it is used to make the code more readable.
-/
universe u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
open CategoryTheory Category
variable {𝒮 : Type u₁} {𝒳 : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} 𝒳] [Category.{v₂} 𝒮] (p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮)
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Helper-type for defining `IsHomLift`. -/
inductive IsHomLiftAux : ∀ {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (_ : R ⟶ S) (_ : a ⟶ b), Prop
| map {a b : 𝒳} (φ : a ⟶ b) : IsHomLiftAux (p.map φ) φ
/-- Given a functor `p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮`, an arrow `φ : a ⟶ b` in `𝒳` and an arrow `f : R ⟶ S` in `𝒮`,
`p.IsHomLift f φ` expresses the fact that `φ` lifts `f` through `p`.
This is often drawn as:
```
a --φ--> b
- -
| |
v v
R --f--> S
``` -/
class Functor.IsHomLift {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) : Prop where
cond : IsHomLiftAux p f φ
/-- `subst_hom_lift p f φ` tries to substitute `f` with `p(φ)` by using `p.IsHomLift f φ` -/
macro "subst_hom_lift" p:term:max f:term:max φ:term:max : tactic =>
`(tactic| obtain ⟨⟩ := Functor.IsHomLift.cond (p := $p) (f := $f) (φ := $φ))
/-- For any arrow `φ : a ⟶ b` in `𝒳`, `φ` lifts the arrow `p.map φ` in the base `𝒮`. -/
@[simp]
instance {a b : 𝒳} (φ : a ⟶ b) : p.IsHomLift (p.map φ) φ where
cond := by constructor
@[simp]
instance (a : 𝒳) : p.IsHomLift (𝟙 (p.obj a)) (𝟙 a) := by
rw [← p.map_id]; infer_instance
namespace IsHomLift
protected lemma id {p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮} {R : 𝒮} {a : 𝒳} (ha : p.obj a = R) : p.IsHomLift (𝟙 R) (𝟙 a) := by
cases ha; infer_instance
section
variable {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳}
lemma domain_eq (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift f φ] : p.obj a = R := by
subst_hom_lift p f φ; rfl
lemma codomain_eq (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift f φ] : p.obj b = S := by
subst_hom_lift p f φ; rfl
variable (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift f φ]
lemma fac : f = eqToHom (domain_eq p f φ).symm ≫ p.map φ ≫ eqToHom (codomain_eq p f φ) := by
subst_hom_lift p f φ; simp
lemma fac' : p.map φ = eqToHom (domain_eq p f φ) ≫ f ≫ eqToHom (codomain_eq p f φ).symm := by
subst_hom_lift p f φ; simp
lemma commSq : CommSq (p.map φ) (eqToHom (domain_eq p f φ)) (eqToHom (codomain_eq p f φ)) f where
w := by simp only [fac p f φ, eqToHom_trans_assoc, eqToHom_refl, id_comp]
end
lemma eq_of_isHomLift {a b : 𝒳} (f : p.obj a ⟶ p.obj b) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift f φ] :
f = p.map φ := by
simp only [fac p f φ, eqToHom_refl, comp_id, id_comp]
lemma of_fac {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (ha : p.obj a = R) (hb : p.obj b = S)
(h : f = eqToHom ha.symm ≫ p.map φ ≫ eqToHom hb) : p.IsHomLift f φ := by
subst ha hb h; simp
lemma of_fac' {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (ha : p.obj a = R) (hb : p.obj b = S)
(h : p.map φ = eqToHom ha ≫ f ≫ eqToHom hb.symm) : p.IsHomLift f φ := by
subst ha hb
obtain rfl : f = p.map φ := by simpa using h.symm
infer_instance
lemma of_commsq {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (ha : p.obj a = R) (hb : p.obj b = S)
(h : p.map φ ≫ eqToHom hb = (eqToHom ha) ≫ f) : p.IsHomLift f φ := by
subst ha hb
obtain rfl : f = p.map φ := by simpa using h.symm
infer_instance
lemma of_commSq {R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (ha : p.obj a = R) (hb : p.obj b = S)
(h : CommSq (p.map φ) (eqToHom ha) (eqToHom hb) f) : p.IsHomLift f φ :=
of_commsq p f φ ha hb h.1
instance comp {R S T : 𝒮} {a b c : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (g : S ⟶ T) (φ : a ⟶ b)
(ψ : b ⟶ c) [p.IsHomLift f φ] [p.IsHomLift g ψ] : p.IsHomLift (f ≫ g) (φ ≫ ψ) := by
apply of_commSq
-- This line transforms the first goal in suitable form; the last line closes all three goals.
on_goal 1 => rw [p.map_comp]
apply CommSq.horiz_comp (commSq p f φ) (commSq p g ψ)
/-- If `φ : a ⟶ b` and `ψ : b ⟶ c` lift `𝟙 R`, then so does `φ ≫ ψ` -/
instance lift_id_comp (R : 𝒮) {a b c : 𝒳} (φ : a ⟶ b) (ψ : b ⟶ c)
[p.IsHomLift (𝟙 R) φ] [p.IsHomLift (𝟙 R) ψ] : p.IsHomLift (𝟙 R) (φ ≫ ψ) :=
comp_id (𝟙 R) ▸ comp p (𝟙 R) (𝟙 R) φ ψ
instance comp_lift_id_right {a b c : 𝒳} {S T : 𝒮} (f : S ⟶ T) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift f φ]
(ψ : b ⟶ c) [p.IsHomLift (𝟙 T) ψ] : p.IsHomLift f (φ ≫ ψ) := by
simpa using inferInstanceAs (p.IsHomLift (f ≫ 𝟙 T) (φ ≫ ψ))
/-- If `φ : a ⟶ b` lifts `f` and `ψ : b ⟶ c` lifts `𝟙 T`, then `φ ≫ ψ` lifts `f` -/
lemma comp_lift_id_right' {R S : 𝒮} {a b c : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift f φ]
(T : 𝒮) (ψ : b ⟶ c) [p.IsHomLift (𝟙 T) ψ] : p.IsHomLift f (φ ≫ ψ) := by
obtain rfl : S = T := by rw [← codomain_eq p f φ, domain_eq p (𝟙 T) ψ]
infer_instance
instance comp_lift_id_left {a b c : 𝒳} {S T : 𝒮} (f : S ⟶ T) (ψ : b ⟶ c) [p.IsHomLift f ψ]
(φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift (𝟙 S) φ] : p.IsHomLift f (φ ≫ ψ) := by
simpa using inferInstanceAs (p.IsHomLift (𝟙 S ≫ f) (φ ≫ ψ))
/-- If `φ : a ⟶ b` lifts `𝟙 T` and `ψ : b ⟶ c` lifts `f`, then `φ ≫ ψ` lifts `f` -/
lemma comp_lift_id_left' {a b c : 𝒳} (R : 𝒮) (φ : a ⟶ b) [p.IsHomLift (𝟙 R) φ]
{S T : 𝒮} (f : S ⟶ T) (ψ : b ⟶ c) [p.IsHomLift f ψ] : p.IsHomLift f (φ ≫ ψ) := by
obtain rfl : R = S := by rw [← codomain_eq p (𝟙 R) φ, domain_eq p f ψ]
infer_instance
lemma eqToHom_domain_lift_id {p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (hab : a = b) {R : 𝒮} (hR : p.obj a = R) :
p.IsHomLift (𝟙 R) (eqToHom hab) := by
subst hR hab; simp
lemma eqToHom_codomain_lift_id {p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (hab : a = b) {S : 𝒮} (hS : p.obj b = S) :
p.IsHomLift (𝟙 S) (eqToHom hab) := by
subst hS hab; simp
lemma id_lift_eqToHom_domain {p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮} {R S : 𝒮} (hRS : R = S) {a : 𝒳} (ha : p.obj a = R) :
p.IsHomLift (eqToHom hRS) (𝟙 a) := by
subst hRS ha; simp
lemma id_lift_eqToHom_codomain {p : 𝒳 ⥤ 𝒮} {R S : 𝒮} (hRS : R = S) {b : 𝒳} (hb : p.obj b = S) :
p.IsHomLift (eqToHom hRS) (𝟙 b) := by
subst hRS hb; simp
instance comp_eqToHom_lift {R S : 𝒮} {a' a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (h : a' = a)
[p.IsHomLift f φ] : p.IsHomLift f (eqToHom h ≫ φ) := by
subst h; simp_all
instance eqToHom_comp_lift {R S : 𝒮} {a b b' : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (h : b = b')
[p.IsHomLift f φ] : p.IsHomLift f (φ ≫ eqToHom h) := by
subst h; simp_all
instance lift_eqToHom_comp {R' R S : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (h : R' = R)
[p.IsHomLift f φ] : p.IsHomLift (eqToHom h ≫ f) φ := by
subst h; simp_all
instance lift_comp_eqToHom {R S S' : 𝒮} {a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (h : S = S')
[p.IsHomLift f φ] : p.IsHomLift (f ≫ eqToHom h) φ := by
subst h; simp_all
|
@[simp]
lemma comp_eqToHom_lift_iff {R S : 𝒮} {a' a b : 𝒳} (f : R ⟶ S) (φ : a ⟶ b) (h : a' = a) :
p.IsHomLift f (eqToHom h ≫ φ) ↔ p.IsHomLift f φ where
mp hφ' := by subst h; simpa using hφ'
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/FiberedCategory/HomLift.lean | 182 | 186 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) :=
monotone_image.strictMono_of_injective inj.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
alias ⟨Injective.existsUnique_of_mem_range, _⟩ := Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx]
theorem LeftInverse.image_image {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
g '' (f '' s) = s := by rw [← image_comp, h.comp_eq_id, image_id]
theorem LeftInverse.preimage_preimage {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [← preimage_comp, h.comp_eq_id, preimage_id]
protected theorem Involutive.preimage {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) : Involutive (preimage f) :=
hf.rightInverse.preimage_preimage
end Function
namespace EquivLike
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} {E : Type*} [EquivLike E ι ι']
@[simp] lemma range_comp {α : Type*} (f : ι' → α) (e : E) : range (f ∘ e) = range f :=
(EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _
end EquivLike
/-! ### Image and preimage on subtypes -/
namespace Subtype
variable {α : Type*}
theorem coe_image {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} :
(↑) '' s = { x | ∃ h : p x, (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s } :=
Set.ext fun a =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, ha'⟩, in_s, h_eq⟩ => h_eq ▸ ⟨ha', in_s⟩, fun ⟨ha, in_s⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, in_s, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_image_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : (↑) '' { x : ↥s | ↑x ∈ t } = t := by
ext x
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', hx⟩ => hx ▸ hx', fun hx => ⟨⟨x, h hx⟩, hx, rfl⟩⟩
theorem range_coe {s : Set α} : range ((↑) : s → α) = s := by
rw [← image_univ]
simp [-image_univ, coe_image]
/-- A variant of `range_coe`. Try to use `range_coe` if possible.
This version is useful when defining a new type that is defined as the subtype of something.
In that case, the coercion doesn't fire anymore. -/
theorem range_val {s : Set α} : range (Subtype.val : s → α) = s :=
range_coe
/-- We make this the simp lemma instead of `range_coe`. The reason is that if we write
for `s : Set α` the function `(↑) : s → α`, then the inferred implicit arguments of `(↑)` are
`↑α (fun x ↦ x ∈ s)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range ((↑) : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_self (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' s = univ := by
rw [← preimage_range, range_coe]
theorem range_val_subtype {p : α → Prop} : range (Subtype.val : Subtype p → α) = { x | p x } :=
range_coe
theorem coe_image_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set s) : ((↑) : s → α) '' t ⊆ s :=
fun x ⟨y, _, yvaleq⟩ => by
rw [← yvaleq]; exact y.property
theorem coe_image_univ (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' Set.univ = s :=
image_univ.trans range_coe
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_coe (s t : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) '' (((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_eq_range_inter.trans <| congr_arg (· ∩ t) range_coe
theorem image_preimage_val (s t : Set α) : (Subtype.val : s → α) '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = s ∩ t :=
image_preimage_coe s t
theorem preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff {s t u : Set α} :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe, coe_injective.image_injective.eq_iff]
theorem preimage_coe_self_inter (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, ← inter_assoc, inter_self]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_inter_self (s t : Set α) :
((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' (t ∩ s) = ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_coe_self_inter]
theorem preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val : s → α) ⁻¹' t = Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff
lemma preimage_val_subset_preimage_val_iff (s t u : Set α) :
(Subtype.val ⁻¹' t : Set s) ⊆ Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u := by
constructor
· rw [← image_preimage_coe, ← image_preimage_coe]
exact image_subset _
· intro h x a
exact (h ⟨x.2, a⟩).2
theorem exists_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∃ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∃ s : Set α, s ⊆ t ∧ p s := by
rw [← exists_subset_range_and_iff, range_coe]
theorem forall_set_subtype {t : Set α} (p : Set α → Prop) :
(∀ s : Set t, p (((↑) : t → α) '' s)) ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s ⊆ t → p s := by
rw [← forall_subset_range_iff, range_coe]
theorem preimage_coe_nonempty {s t : Set α} :
(((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_preimage_coe, image_nonempty]
theorem preimage_coe_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' t = ∅ ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ := by
simp [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, preimage_coe_nonempty]
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_coe_compl (s : Set α) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' sᶜ = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (inter_compl_self s)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_coe_compl' (s : Set α) :
(fun x : (sᶜ : Set α) => (x : α)) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
preimage_coe_eq_empty.2 (compl_inter_self s)
end Subtype
/-! ### Images and preimages on `Option` -/
open Set
namespace Option
theorem injective_iff {α β} {f : Option α → β} :
Injective f ↔ Injective (f ∘ some) ∧ f none ∉ range (f ∘ some) := by
simp only [mem_range, not_exists, (· ∘ ·)]
refine
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.comp (Option.some_injective _), fun x => hf.ne <| Option.some_ne_none _⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h_some, h_none⟩ (_ | a) (_ | b) hab
exacts [rfl, (h_none _ hab.symm).elim, (h_none _ hab).elim, congr_arg some (h_some hab)]
theorem range_eq {α β} (f : Option α → β) : range f = insert (f none) (range (f ∘ some)) :=
Set.ext fun _ => Option.exists.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
end Option
namespace Set
open Function
/-! ### Injectivity and surjectivity lemmas for image and preimage -/
section ImagePreimage
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β}
@[simp]
theorem image_surjective : Surjective (image f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h y => ?_, Surjective.image_surjective⟩
rcases h {y} with ⟨s, hs⟩
have := mem_singleton y; rw [← hs] at this; rcases this with ⟨x, _, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_injective : Injective (image f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x x' hx => ?_, Injective.image_injective⟩
rw [← singleton_eq_singleton_iff]; apply h
rw [image_singleton, image_singleton, hx]
theorem preimage_eq_iff_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
f ⁻¹' s = t ↔ s = f '' t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
theorem eq_preimage_iff_image_eq {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {s t} :
s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ f '' s = t := by rw [← image_eq_image hf.1, hf.2.image_preimage]
end ImagePreimage
end Set
/-! ### Disjoint lemmas for image and preimage -/
section Disjoint
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem Disjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun _ hx => h.le_bot hx
lemma Codisjoint.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : Codisjoint s t) :
Codisjoint (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := by
simp only [codisjoint_iff_le_sup, Set.sup_eq_union, top_le_iff, ← Set.preimage_union] at h ⊢
rw [h]; rfl
lemma IsCompl.preimage (f : α → β) {s t : Set β} (h : IsCompl s t) :
IsCompl (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
⟨h.1.preimage f, h.2.preimage f⟩
|
namespace Set
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,329 | 1,330 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Extra lemmas about permutations
This file proves miscellaneous lemmas about `Equiv.Perm`.
## TODO
Most of the content of this file was moved to `Algebra.Group.End` in
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/22141.
It would be good to merge the remaining lemmas with other files, eg `GroupTheory.Perm.ViaEmbedding`
looks like it could benefit from such a treatment (splitting into the algebra and non-algebra parts)
-/
universe u v
namespace Equiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace Perm
@[simp] lemma image_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ '' s = f ⁻¹' s := f⁻¹.image_eq_preimage _
@[simp] lemma preimage_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ ⁻¹' s = f '' s :=
(f.image_eq_preimage _).symm
end Perm
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem swap_smul_self_smul [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) (x : β) :
swap i j • swap i j • x = x := by simp [smul_smul]
theorem swap_smul_involutive [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) :
Function.Involutive (swap i j • · : β → β) := swap_smul_self_smul i j
end Swap
end Equiv
open Equiv Function
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} {f : Perm α} {s : Set α}
lemma BijOn.perm_inv (hf : BijOn f s s) : BijOn ↑(f⁻¹) s s := hf.symm f.invOn
lemma MapsTo.perm_pow : MapsTo f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, MapsTo (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact MapsTo.iterate
lemma SurjOn.perm_pow : SurjOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, SurjOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact SurjOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_pow : BijOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact BijOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_zpow (hf : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n : ℤ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s
| Int.ofNat n => hf.perm_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => (hf.perm_pow (n + 1)).perm_inv
end Set
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Basic.lean | 691 | 694 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
/-!
# Equality modulo an element
This file defines equality modulo an element in a commutative group.
## Main definitions
* `a ≡ b [PMOD p]`: `a` and `b` are congruent modulo `p`.
## See also
`SModEq` is a generalisation to arbitrary submodules.
## TODO
Delete `Int.ModEq` in favour of `AddCommGroup.ModEq`. Generalise `SModEq` to `AddSubgroup` and
redefine `AddCommGroup.ModEq` using it. Once this is done, we can rename `AddCommGroup.ModEq`
to `AddSubgroup.ModEq` and multiplicativise it. Longer term, we could generalise to submonoids and
also unify with `Nat.ModEq`.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] {p a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α} {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ}
/-- `a ≡ b [PMOD p]` means that `b` is congruent to `a` modulo `p`.
Equivalently (as shown in `Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod`), `b` does not lie in the open interval
`(a, a + p)` modulo `p`, or `toIcoMod hp a` disagrees with `toIocMod hp a` at `b`, or
`toIcoDiv hp a` disagrees with `toIocDiv hp a` at `b`. -/
def ModEq (p a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ z : ℤ, b - a = z • p
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [PMOD " p "]" => ModEq p a b
@[refl, simp]
theorem modEq_refl (a : α) : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem modEq_rfl : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
modEq_refl _
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.symm, _⟩ := modEq_comm
attribute [symm] ModEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem ModEq.trans : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → b ≡ c [PMOD p] → a ≡ c [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨m + n, by simp [add_smul, ← hm, ← hn]⟩
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq p) :=
⟨modEq_refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, neg_add_eq_sub]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg, ModEq.neg⟩ := neg_modEq_neg
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [PMOD -p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg', ModEq.neg'⟩ := modEq_neg
theorem modEq_sub (a b : α) : a ≡ b [PMOD b - a] :=
⟨1, (one_smul _ _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem modEq_zero : a ≡ b [PMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by simp [ModEq, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem self_modEq_zero : p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-1, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zero (z : ℤ) : z • p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem add_zsmul_modEq (z : ℤ) : a + z • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem zsmul_add_modEq (z : ℤ) : z • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
theorem add_nsmul_modEq (n : ℕ) : a + n • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp⟩
theorem nsmul_add_modEq (n : ℕ) : n • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
namespace ModEq
protected theorem add_zsmul (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + z • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_zsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem zsmul_add (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(zsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem add_nsmul (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + n • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_nsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem nsmul_add (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(nsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem of_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD z • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * z, by rwa [mul_smul]⟩
protected theorem of_nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD n • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * n, by rwa [mul_smul, natCast_zsmul]⟩
protected theorem zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
protected theorem nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
end ModEq
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ α] (hn : z ≠ 0) :
z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_modEq_nsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
alias ⟨ModEq.zsmul_cancel, _⟩ := zsmul_modEq_zsmul
alias ⟨ModEq.nsmul_cancel, _⟩ := nsmul_modEq_nsmul
namespace ModEq
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
protected alias ⟨add_left_cancel, add⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_left
protected alias ⟨add_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_right
protected alias ⟨sub_left_cancel, sub⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_left
protected alias ⟨sub_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_right
protected theorem add_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add h
protected theorem sub_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub h
protected theorem add_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
h.add modEq_rfl
protected theorem sub_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] :=
h.sub modEq_rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : α) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_left_cancel
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : α) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_right_cancel
protected theorem sub_left_cancel' (c : α) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_left_cancel
protected theorem sub_right_cancel' (c : α) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_right_cancel
end ModEq
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq' : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ c + a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp [ModEq, sub_sub]
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ a + c ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans <| by rw [add_comm]
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add' : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans modEq_comm
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq.trans modEq_comm
@[simp]
theorem sub_modEq_zero : a - b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by simp [sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add]
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_left : a + b ≡ a [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq']
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_right : a + b ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq]
theorem modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, b = a + z • p := by
simp_rw [ModEq, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_add_zsmul : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b ≠ a + z • p := by
rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, not_exists]
theorem modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) = a := by
simp_rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff,
eq_sub_iff_add_eq', eq_comm]
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) ≠ a :=
modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples.not
end AddCommGroup
@[simp]
theorem modEq_iff_int_modEq {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD z] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD z] := by
simp [ModEq, dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne α] [CharZero α]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_modEq_intCast {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (z : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD z] := by
simp_rw [ModEq, ← Int.cast_mul_eq_zsmul_cast]
norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_modEq_intCast' {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (n : ℤ)] := by
simpa using intCast_modEq_intCast (α := α) (z := n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_modEq_natCast {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
simp_rw [← Int.natCast_modEq_iff, ← modEq_iff_int_modEq, ← @intCast_modEq_intCast α,
Int.cast_natCast]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_intCast, ModEq.intCast⟩ := intCast_modEq_intCast
alias ⟨_root_.Nat.ModEq.of_natCast, ModEq.natCast⟩ := natCast_modEq_natCast
end AddCommGroupWithOne
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing α] {a b c p : α}
@[simp] lemma div_modEq_div (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c ≡ b / c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p * c)] := by
simp [ModEq, ← sub_div, div_eq_iff hc, mul_assoc]
@[simp] lemma mul_modEq_mul_right (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c ≡ b * c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (p / c)] := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← div_modEq_div (inv_ne_zero hc), div_inv_eq_mul, div_inv_eq_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/ModEq.lean | 283 | 283 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p.succ` is the identity away from `p.succ`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_succAbove_predAbove {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.succ) :
p.succ.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.2 h),
succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (p.castSucc_le_succ) h),
succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ <| Fin.le_of_lt h]
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
| rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,348 | 1,350 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Bivariate
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Weierstrass
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.VariableChange
/-!
# Affine coordinates for Weierstrass curves
This file defines the type of points on a Weierstrass curve as an inductive, consisting of the point
at infinity and affine points satisfying a Weierstrass equation with a nonsingular condition. This
file also defines the negation and addition operations of the group law for this type, and proves
that they respect the Weierstrass equation and the nonsingular condition. The fact that they form an
abelian group is proven in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` with coefficients `aᵢ`. An *affine point*
on `W` is a tuple `(x, y)` of elements in `R` satisfying the *Weierstrass equation* `W(X, Y) = 0` in
*affine coordinates*, where `W(X, Y) := Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y - (X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆)`. It is
*nonsingular* if its partial derivatives `W_X(x, y)` and `W_Y(x, y)` do not vanish simultaneously.
The nonsingular affine points on `W` can be given negation and addition operations defined by a
secant-and-tangent process.
* Given a nonsingular affine point `P`, its *negation* `-P` is defined to be the unique third
nonsingular point of intersection between `W` and the vertical line through `P`.
Explicitly, if `P` is `(x, y)`, then `-P` is `(x, -y - a₁x - a₃)`.
* Given two nonsingular affine points `P` and `Q`, their *addition* `P + Q` is defined to be the
negation of the unique third nonsingular point of intersection between `W` and the line `L`
through `P` and `Q`. Explicitly, let `P` be `(x₁, y₁)` and let `Q` be `(x₂, y₂)`.
* If `x₁ = x₂` and `y₁ = -y₂ - a₁x₂ - a₃`, then `L` is vertical.
* If `x₁ = x₂` and `y₁ ≠ -y₂ - a₁x₂ - a₃`, then `L` is the tangent of `W` at `P = Q`, and has
slope `ℓ := (3x₁² + 2a₂x₁ + a₄ - a₁y₁) / (2y₁ + a₁x₁ + a₃)`.
* Otherwise `x₁ ≠ x₂`, then `L` is the secant of `W` through `P` and `Q`, and has slope
`ℓ := (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)`.
In the last two cases, the `X`-coordinate of `P + Q` is then the unique third solution of the
equation obtained by substituting the line `Y = ℓ(X - x₁) + y₁` into the Weierstrass equation,
and can be written down explicitly as `x := ℓ² + a₁ℓ - a₂ - x₁ - x₂` by inspecting the
coefficients of `X²`. The `Y`-coordinate of `P + Q`, after applying the final negation that maps
`Y` to `-Y - a₁X - a₃`, is precisely `y := -(ℓ(x - x₁) + y₁) - a₁x - a₃`.
The type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine coordinates is an inductive, consisting of the
unique point at infinity `𝓞` and nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. Then `W⟮F⟯` can be endowed with
a group law, with `𝓞` as the identity nonsingular point, which is uniquely determined by these
formulae.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Equation`: the Weierstrass equation of an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Nonsingular`: the nonsingular condition on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point`: a nonsingular rational point on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.neg`: the negation operation on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.add`: the addition operation on an affine Weierstrass curve.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.equation_neg`: negation preserves the Weierstrass equation.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.equation_add`: addition preserves the Weierstrass equation.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_neg`: negation preserves the nonsingular condition.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_add`: addition preserves the nonsingular condition.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero`: an affine Weierstrass curve is nonsingular at
every point if its discriminant is non-zero.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular`: an affine elliptic curve is nonsingular at every point.
## Notations
* `W⟮K⟯`: the group of nonsingular rational points on `W` base changed to `K`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, rational point, affine coordinates
-/
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "derivative_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [derivative_C, derivative_X, derivative_X_pow, derivative_neg, derivative_add,
derivative_sub, derivative_mul, derivative_sq])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow, evalEval])
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, map_div₀,
Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_neg, Polynomial.map_add, Polynomial.map_sub,
Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_div, coe_mapRingHom,
WeierstrassCurve.map])
universe r s u v w
/-! ## Weierstrass curves -/
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type r} {S : Type s} {A F : Type u} {B K : Type v} {L : Type w}
variable (R) in
/-- An abbreviation for a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates. -/
abbrev Affine : Type r :=
WeierstrassCurve R
/-- The conversion from a Weierstrass curve to affine coordinates. -/
abbrev toAffine (W : WeierstrassCurve R) : Affine R :=
W
namespace Affine
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Field F] [Field K] [Field L]
{W' : Affine R} {W : Affine F}
section Equation
/-! ### Weierstrass equations -/
variable (W') in
/-- The polynomial `W(X, Y) := Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y - (X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆)` associated to a Weierstrass
curve `W` over a ring `R` in affine coordinates.
For ease of polynomial manipulation, this is represented as a term of type `R[X][X]`, where the
inner variable represents `X` and the outer variable represents `Y`. For clarity, the alternative
notations `Y` and `R[X][Y]` are provided in the `Polynomial.Bivariate` scope to represent the outer
variable and the bivariate polynomial ring `R[X][X]` respectively. -/
noncomputable def polynomial : R[X][Y] :=
Y ^ 2 + C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃) * Y - C (X ^ 3 + C W'.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W'.a₄ * X + C W'.a₆)
lemma polynomial_eq : W'.polynomial = Cubic.toPoly
⟨0, 1, Cubic.toPoly ⟨0, 0, W'.a₁, W'.a₃⟩, Cubic.toPoly ⟨-1, -W'.a₂, -W'.a₄, -W'.a₆⟩⟩ := by
simp only [polynomial, Cubic.toPoly]
C_simp
ring1
lemma polynomial_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial ≠ 0 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma degree_polynomial [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial.degree = 2 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero' one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_polynomial [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial.natDegree = 2 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero' one_ne_zero
lemma monic_polynomial : W'.polynomial.Monic := by
nontriviality R
simpa only [polynomial_eq] using Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one'
lemma irreducible_polynomial [IsDomain R] : Irreducible W'.polynomial := by
by_contra h
rcases (monic_polynomial.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff natDegree_polynomial).mp h
with ⟨f, g, h0, h1⟩
simp only [polynomial_eq, Cubic.coeff_eq_c, Cubic.coeff_eq_d] at h0 h1
apply_fun degree at h0 h1
rw [Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero' <| neg_ne_zero.mpr <| one_ne_zero' R, degree_mul] at h0
apply (h1.symm.le.trans Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero').not_lt
rcases Nat.WithBot.add_eq_three_iff.mp h0.symm with h | h | h | h
iterate 2 rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt] <;> simp only [h] <;> decide
iterate 2 rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt] <;> simp only [h] <;> decide
lemma evalEval_polynomial (x y : R) : W'.polynomial.evalEval x y =
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y - (x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆) := by
simp only [polynomial]
eval_simp
rw [add_mul, ← add_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomial_zero : W'.polynomial.evalEval 0 0 = -W'.a₆ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomial, zero_add, zero_sub, mul_zero, zero_pow <| Nat.succ_ne_zero _]
variable (W') in
/-- The proposition that an affine point `(x, y)` lies in a Weierstrass curve `W`.
In other words, it satisfies the Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0`. -/
def Equation (x y : R) : Prop :=
W'.polynomial.evalEval x y = 0
lemma equation_iff' (x y : R) : W'.Equation x y ↔
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y - (x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆) = 0 := by
rw [Equation, evalEval_polynomial]
lemma equation_iff (x y : R) : W'.Equation x y ↔
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y = x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆ := by
rw [equation_iff', sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma equation_zero : W'.Equation 0 0 ↔ W'.a₆ = 0 := by
rw [Equation, evalEval_polynomial_zero, neg_eq_zero]
lemma equation_iff_variableChange (x y : R) :
W'.Equation x y ↔ (VariableChange.mk 1 x 0 y • W').toAffine.Equation 0 0 := by
rw [equation_iff', ← neg_eq_zero, equation_zero, variableChange_a₆, inv_one, Units.val_one]
congr! 1
ring1
end Equation
section Nonsingular
/-! ### Nonsingular Weierstrass equations -/
variable (W') in
/-- The partial derivative `W_X(X, Y)` with respect to `X` of the polynomial `W(X, Y)` associated to
a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. -/
-- TODO: define this in terms of `Polynomial.derivative`.
noncomputable def polynomialX : R[X][Y] :=
C (C W'.a₁) * Y - C (C 3 * X ^ 2 + C (2 * W'.a₂) * X + C W'.a₄)
lemma evalEval_polynomialX (x y : R) :
W'.polynomialX.evalEval x y = W'.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄) := by
simp only [polynomialX]
eval_simp
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomialX_zero : W'.polynomialX.evalEval 0 0 = -W'.a₄ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomialX, zero_add, zero_sub, mul_zero, zero_pow <| Nat.succ_ne_zero _]
|
variable (W') in
/-- The partial derivative `W_Y(X, Y)` with respect to `Y` of the polynomial `W(X, Y)` associated to
a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. -/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean | 231 | 234 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Matroids
A `Matroid` is a structure that combinatorially abstracts
the notion of linear independence and dependence;
matroids have connections with graph theory, discrete optimization,
additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry.
Mathematically, a matroid `M` is a structure on a set `E` comprising a
collection of subsets of `E` called the bases of `M`,
where the bases are required to obey certain axioms.
This file gives a definition of a matroid `M` in terms of its bases,
and some API relating independent sets (subsets of bases) and the notion of a
basis of a set `X` (a maximal independent subset of `X`).
## Main definitions
* a `Matroid α` on a type `α` is a structure comprising a 'ground set'
and a suitably behaved 'base' predicate.
Given `M : Matroid α` ...
* `M.E` denotes the ground set of `M`, which has type `Set α`
* For `B : Set α`, `M.IsBase B` means that `B` is a base of `M`.
* For `I : Set α`, `M.Indep I` means that `I` is independent in `M`
(that is, `I` is contained in a base of `M`).
* For `D : Set α`, `M.Dep D` means that `D` is contained in the ground set of `M`
but isn't independent.
* For `I : Set α` and `X : Set α`, `M.IsBasis I X` means that `I` is a maximal independent
subset of `X`.
* `M.Finite` means that `M` has finite ground set.
* `M.Nonempty` means that the ground set of `M` is nonempty.
* `RankFinite M` means that the bases of `M` are finite.
* `RankInfinite M` means that the bases of `M` are infinite.
* `RankPos M` means that the bases of `M` are nonempty.
* `Finitary M` means that a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are
independent.
* `aesop_mat` : a tactic designed to prove `X ⊆ M.E` for some set `X` and matroid `M`.
## Implementation details
There are a few design decisions worth discussing.
### Finiteness
The first is that our matroids are allowed to be infinite.
Unlike with many mathematical structures, this isn't such an obvious choice.
Finite matroids have been studied since the 1930's,
and there was never controversy as to what is and isn't an example of a finite matroid -
in fact, surprisingly many apparently different definitions of a matroid
give rise to the same class of objects.
However, generalizing different definitions of a finite matroid
to the infinite in the obvious way (i.e. by simply allowing the ground set to be infinite)
gives a number of different notions of 'infinite matroid' that disagree with each other,
and that all lack nice properties.
Many different competing notions of infinite matroid were studied through the years;
in fact, the problem of which definition is the best was only really solved in 2013,
when Bruhn et al. [2] showed that there is a unique 'reasonable' notion of an infinite matroid
(these objects had previously defined by Higgs under the name 'B-matroid').
These are defined by adding one carefully chosen axiom to the standard set,
and adapting existing axioms to not mention set cardinalities;
they enjoy nearly all the nice properties of standard finite matroids.
Even though at least 90% of the literature is on finite matroids,
B-matroids are the definition we use, because they allow for additional generality,
nearly all theorems are still true and just as easy to state,
and (hopefully) the more general definition will prevent the need for a costly future refactor.
The disadvantage is that developing API for the finite case is harder work
(for instance, it is harder to prove that something is a matroid in the first place,
and one must deal with `ℕ∞` rather than `ℕ`).
For serious work on finite matroids, we provide the typeclasses
`[M.Finite]` and `[RankFinite M]` and associated API.
### Cardinality
Just as with bases of a vector space,
all bases of a finite matroid `M` are finite and have the same cardinality;
this cardinality is an important invariant known as the 'rank' of `M`.
For infinite matroids, bases are not in general equicardinal;
in fact the equicardinality of bases of infinite matroids is independent of ZFC [3].
What is still true is that either all bases are finite and equicardinal,
or all bases are infinite. This means that the natural notion of 'size'
for a set in matroid theory is given by the function `Set.encard`, which
is the cardinality as a term in `ℕ∞`. We use this function extensively
in building the API; it is preferable to both `Set.ncard` and `Finset.card`
because it allows infinite sets to be handled without splitting into cases.
### The ground `Set`
A last place where we make a consequential choice is making the ground set of a matroid
a structure field of type `Set α` (where `α` is the type of 'possible matroid elements')
rather than just having a type `α` of all the matroid elements.
This is because of how common it is to simultaneously consider
a number of matroids on different but related ground sets.
For example, a matroid `M` on ground set `E` can have its structure
'restricted' to some subset `R ⊆ E` to give a smaller matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`.
A statement like `(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂` is mathematically obvious.
But if the ground set of a matroid is a type, this doesn't typecheck,
and is only true up to canonical isomorphism.
Restriction is just the tip of the iceberg here;
one can also 'contract' and 'delete' elements and sets of elements
in a matroid to give a smaller matroid,
and in practice it is common to make statements like `M₁.E = M₂.E ∩ M₃.E` and
`((M ⟋ e) ↾ R) ⟋ C = M ⟋ (C ∪ {e}) ↾ R`.
Such things are a nightmare to work with unless `=` is actually propositional equality
(especially because the relevant coercions are usually between sets and not just elements).
So the solution is that the ground set `M.E` has type `Set α`,
and there are elements of type `α` that aren't in the matroid.
The tradeoff is that for many statements, one now has to add
hypotheses of the form `X ⊆ M.E` to make sure than `X` is actually 'in the matroid',
rather than letting a 'type of matroid elements' take care of this invisibly.
It still seems that this is worth it.
The tactic `aesop_mat` exists specifically to discharge such goals
with minimal fuss (using default values).
The tactic works fairly well, but has room for improvement.
A related decision is to not have matroids themselves be a typeclass.
This would make things be notationally simpler
(having `Base` in the presence of `[Matroid α]` rather than `M.Base` for a term `M : Matroid α`)
but is again just too awkward when one has multiple matroids on the same type.
In fact, in regular written mathematics,
it is normal to explicitly indicate which matroid something is happening in,
so our notation mirrors common practice.
### Notation
We use a few nonstandard conventions in theorem names that are related to the above.
First, we mirror common informal practice by referring explicitly to the `ground` set rather
than the notation `E`. (Writing `ground` everywhere in a proof term would be unwieldy, and
writing `E` in theorem names would be unnatural to read.)
Second, because we are typically interested in subsets of the ground set `M.E`,
using `Set.compl` is inconvenient, since `Xᶜ ⊆ M.E` is typically false for `X ⊆ M.E`.
On the other hand (especially when duals arise), it is common to complement
a set `X ⊆ M.E` *within* the ground set, giving `M.E \ X`.
For this reason, we use the term `compl` in theorem names to refer to taking a set difference
with respect to the ground set, rather than a complement within a type. The lemma
`compl_isBase_dual` is one of the many examples of this.
Finally, in theorem names, matroid predicates that apply to sets
(such as `Base`, `Indep`, `IsBasis`) are typically used as suffixes rather than prefixes.
For instance, we have `ground_indep_iff_isBase` rather than `indep_ground_iff_isBase`.
## References
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
* [H. Bruhn, R. Diestel, M. Kriesell, R. Pendavingh, P. Wollan, Axioms for infinite matroids,
Adv. Math 239 (2013), 18-46][bruhnDiestelKriesselPendavinghWollan2013]
* [N. Bowler, S. Geschke, Self-dual uniform matroids on infinite sets,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 459-471][bowlerGeschke2015]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
/-- A predicate `P` on sets satisfies the **exchange property** if,
for all `X` and `Y` satisfying `P` and all `a ∈ X \ Y`, there exists `b ∈ Y \ X` so that
swapping `a` for `b` in `X` maintains `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
/-- A set `X` has the maximal subset property for a predicate `P` if every subset of `X` satisfying
`P` is contained in a maximal subset of `X` satisfying `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → ∃ J, I ⊆ J ∧ Maximal (fun K ↦ P K ∧ K ⊆ X) J
/-- A `Matroid α` is a ground set `E` of type `Set α`, and a nonempty collection of its subsets
satisfying the exchange property and the maximal subset property. Each such set is called a
`Base` of `M`. An `Indep`endent set is just a set contained in a base, but we include this
predicate as a structure field for better definitional properties.
In most cases, using this definition directly is not the best way to construct a matroid,
since it requires specifying both the bases and independent sets. If the bases are known,
use `Matroid.ofBase` or a variant. If just the independent sets are known,
define an `IndepMatroid`, and then use `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
-/
structure Matroid (α : Type*) where
/-- `M` has a ground set `E`. -/
(E : Set α)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Base` defining its bases. -/
(IsBase : Set α → Prop)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Indep` defining its independent sets. -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
/-- The `Indep`endent sets are those contained in `Base`s. -/
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B)
/-- There is at least one `Base`. -/
(exists_isBase : ∃ B, IsBase B)
/-- For any bases `B`, `B'` and `e ∈ B \ B'`, there is some `f ∈ B' \ B` for which `B-e+f`
is a base. -/
(isBase_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty IsBase)
/-- Every independent subset `I` of a set `X` for is contained in a maximal independent
subset of `X`. -/
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
/-- Every base is contained in the ground set. -/
(subset_ground : ∀ B, IsBase B → B ⊆ E)
attribute [local ext] Matroid
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Base := IsBase
instance (M : Matroid α) : Nonempty {B // M.IsBase B} :=
nonempty_subtype.2 M.exists_isBase
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having finite ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Finite`. -/
@[mk_iff] protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is finite -/
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having nonempty ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Nonempty`. -/
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is nonempty -/
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
lemma nonempty_type (M : Matroid α) [h : M.Nonempty] : Nonempty α :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty.some⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
/-- A `RankFinite` matroid is one whose bases are finite -/
@[mk_iff] class RankFinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is a finite base -/
exists_finite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias FiniteRk := RankFinite
instance rankFinite_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : RankFinite M :=
⟨M.exists_isBase.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
/-- An `RankInfinite` matroid is one whose bases are infinite. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is an infinite base -/
exists_infinite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias InfiniteRk := RankInfinite
/-- A `RankPos` matroid is one whose bases are nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The empty set isn't a base -/
empty_not_isBase : ¬M.IsBase ∅
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias RkPos := RankPos
instance rankPos_nonempty {M : Matroid α} [M.RankPos] : M.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain rfl | ⟨e, heB⟩ := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact False.elim <| RankPos.empty_not_isBase hB
exact ⟨e, M.subset_ground B hB heB ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")] alias rkPos_iff_empty_not_base := rankPos_iff
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {IsBase : Set α → Prop} {B B' : Set α}
/-- A family of sets with the exchange property is an antichain. -/
theorem antichain (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB : IsBase B) (hB' : IsBase B') (h : B ⊆ B') :
B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
theorem encard_diff_le_aux {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
(exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
variable {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
/-- For any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property, the differences `B₁ \ B₂`
and `B₂ \ B₁` have the same `ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_diff_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
(encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB₂).antisymm (encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₂ hB₁)
/-- Any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property have the same
`ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_isBase_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter B₁ B₂, exch.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂, inter_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
end ExchangeProperty
end exchange
section aesop
/-- The `aesop_mat` tactic attempts to prove a set is contained in the ground set of a matroid.
It uses a `[Matroid]` ruleset, and is allowed to fail. -/
macro (name := aesop_mat) "aesop_mat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Matroid):ident]))
/- We add a number of trivial lemmas (deliberately specialized to statements in terms of the
ground set of a matroid) to the ruleset `Matroid` for `aesop`. -/
variable {X Y : Set α} {e : α}
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_right_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
X ∩ Y ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_left.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_left_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
Y ∩ X ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_right.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem diff_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : X \ Y ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_diff_subset_ground : M.E \ X ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset_ground rfl.subset
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem singleton_subset_ground (he : e ∈ M.E) : {e} ⊆ M.E :=
singleton_subset_iff.mpr he
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
| private theorem subset_ground_of_subset (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hXY.trans hY
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 365 | 367 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Grayson Burton, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.WithTopBot
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.WithBotTop
/-!
# The covering relation
This file proves properties of the covering relation in an order.
We say that `b` *covers* `a` if `a < b` and there is no element in between.
We say that `b` *weakly covers* `a` if `a ≤ b` and there is no element between `a` and `b`.
In a partial order this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ a = b`,
in a preorder this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a)`
## Notation
* `a ⋖ b` means that `b` covers `a`.
* `a ⩿ b` means that `b` weakly covers `a`.
-/
open Set OrderDual
variable {α β : Type*}
section WeaklyCovers
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.le (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1
theorem WCovBy.refl (a : α) : a ⩿ a :=
⟨le_rfl, fun _ hc => hc.not_lt⟩
@[simp] lemma WCovBy.rfl : a ⩿ a := WCovBy.refl a
protected theorem Eq.wcovBy (h : a = b) : a ⩿ b :=
h ▸ WCovBy.rfl
theorem wcovBy_of_le_of_le (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h1, fun _ hac hcb => (hac.trans hcb).not_le h2⟩
alias LE.le.wcovBy_of_le := wcovBy_of_le_of_le
theorem AntisymmRel.wcovBy (h : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ b :=
wcovBy_of_le_of_le h.1 h.2
theorem WCovBy.wcovBy_iff_le (hab : a ⩿ b) : b ⩿ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h.le, fun h => h.wcovBy_of_le hab.le⟩
theorem wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_wcovBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⩿ c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans hbc.le, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ c ↔ b ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_wcovBy, hab.trans_wcovBy⟩
theorem WCovBy.trans_antisymm_rel (hab : a ⩿ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.le.trans hbc.1, fun _ had hdc => hab.2 had <| hdc.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⩿ a ↔ c ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab.symm⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_wcovBy_iff (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a ⩿ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [WCovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
instance WCovBy.isRefl : IsRefl α (· ⩿ ·) :=
⟨WCovBy.refl⟩
theorem WCovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h.2 hx.1 hx.2
theorem wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⩿ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le' (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem WCovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⩿ f b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨f.le_iff_le.mp h.le, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem WCovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⩿ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⩿ f b := by
refine ⟨f.monotone hab.le, fun c ha hb => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := h.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨ha.le, hb.le⟩
rw [f.lt_iff_lt] at ha hb
exact hab.2 ha hb
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⩿ f b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h2 => h2.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_wcovBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⩿ e b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⩿ toDual a ↔ a ⩿ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⩿ ofDual b ↔ b ⩿ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff
theorem OrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ↪o β) {x y : α} (h : f x ⩿ f y) : x ⩿ y := by
use f.le_iff_le.1 h.1
intro a
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, ← f.lt_iff_lt]
apply h.2
theorem OrderIso.map_wcovBy {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : f x ⩿ f y ↔ x ⩿ y := by
use f.toOrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x, ← f.symm_apply_apply y]
exact f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b := by
rcases h2.eq_or_lt with (h2 | h2); · exact Or.inl h2.symm
rcases h3.eq_or_lt with (h3 | h3); · exact Or.inr h3
exact (h.2 h2 h3).elim
/-- An `iff` version of `WCovBy.eq_or_eq` and `wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem wcovBy_iff_le_and_eq_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.le, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
theorem WCovBy.le_and_le_iff (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ c ∧ c ≤ b ↔ c = a ∨ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h2 => h.eq_or_eq h2.1 h2.2, ?_⟩; rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨le_rfl, h.le⟩, ⟨h.le, le_rfl⟩]
theorem WCovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} := by
ext c
exact h.le_and_le_iff
theorem WCovBy.Ico_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ico a b ⊆ {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff, pair_comm]
theorem WCovBy.Ioc_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioc a b ⊆ {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
end PartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.sup_eq (hac : a ⩿ c) (hbc : b ⩿ c) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊔ b = c :=
(sup_le hac.le hbc.le).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
hab.lt_sup_or_lt_sup.elim (fun h' => hac.2 h' h) fun h' => hbc.2 h' h
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.inf_eq (hca : c ⩿ a) (hcb : c ⩿ b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b = c :=
(le_inf hca.le hcb.le).eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.inf_lt_or_inf_lt.elim (hca.2 h) (hcb.2 h)
end SemilatticeInf
end WeaklyCovers
section LT
variable [LT α] {a b : α}
theorem CovBy.lt (h : a ⋖ b) : a < b :=
h.1
/-- If `a < b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_covBy_iff (h : a < b) : ¬a ⋖ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [CovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
alias ⟨exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy, _⟩ := not_covBy_iff
alias LT.lt.exists_lt_lt := exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy
/-- In a dense order, nothing covers anything. -/
theorem not_covBy [DenselyOrdered α] : ¬a ⋖ b := fun h =>
let ⟨_, hc⟩ := exists_between h.1
h.2 hc.1 hc.2
theorem denselyOrdered_iff_forall_not_covBy : DenselyOrdered α ↔ ∀ a b : α, ¬a ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h _ _ => @not_covBy _ _ _ _ h, fun h =>
⟨fun _ _ hab => exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy hab <| h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toDual_covBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⋖ toDual a ↔ a ⋖ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⋖ ofDual b ↔ b ⋖ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
alias ⟨_, CovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_covBy_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, CovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.le (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1.le
protected theorem CovBy.ne (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≠ b :=
h.lt.ne
theorem CovBy.ne' (h : a ⋖ b) : b ≠ a :=
h.lt.ne'
protected theorem CovBy.wcovBy (h : a ⋖ b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h.le, h.2⟩
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_not_le (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : ¬b ≤ a) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_not_le h2, h.2⟩
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_lt (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a < b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h2, h.2⟩
lemma CovBy.of_le_of_lt (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b < c) : b ⋖ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma CovBy.of_lt_of_le (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a < b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem not_covBy_of_lt_of_lt (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b < c) : ¬a ⋖ c :=
(not_covBy_iff (h₁.trans h₂)).2 ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a < b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_lt h.2⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt.not_le⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_not_le h.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun h' => h.covBy_of_not_le fun hba => h' ⟨h.le, hba⟩,
fun h' => h'.elim (fun h => h.wcovBy) fun h => h.1.wcovBy_of_le h.2⟩
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_le_and_le, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_covBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans_lt hbc.lt, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem covBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⋖ c ↔ b ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_covBy, hab.trans_covBy⟩
theorem CovBy.trans_antisymmRel (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.lt.trans_le hbc.1, fun _ had hdb => hab.2 had <| hdb.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem covBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⋖ a ↔ c ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab.symm⟩
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder α (· ⩿ ·) (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ =>
covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le.trans <| and_congr_right fun h => h.wcovBy_iff_le.not.symm⟩
instance CovBy.isIrrefl : IsIrrefl α (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ ha => ha.ne rfl⟩
theorem CovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
h.wcovBy.Ioo_eq
theorem covBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem CovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⋖ f b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨f.lt_iff_lt.mp h.lt, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem CovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⋖ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⋖ f b :=
(hab.wcovBy.image f h).covBy_of_lt <| f.strictMono hab.lt
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⋖ f b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨CovBy.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_covBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⋖ e b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_covBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
theorem covBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a < b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem OrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ↪o β) {x y : α} (h : f x ⋖ f y) : x ⋖ y := by
use f.lt_iff_lt.1 h.1
intro a
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, ← f.lt_iff_lt]
apply h.2
theorem OrderIso.map_covBy {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : f x ⋖ f y ↔ x ⋖ y := by
use f.toOrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x, ← f.symm_apply_apply y]
exact f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_ne (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≠ b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_ne h2, h.2⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_ne : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.ne⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_ne h.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a = b := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le]
theorem wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy : a ⩿ b ↔ a = b ∨ a ⋖ b :=
wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq.trans or_comm
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_eq, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq
alias ⟨WCovBy.eq_or_covBy, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy
theorem CovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⋖ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b :=
h.wcovBy.eq_or_eq h2 h3
/-- An `iff` version of `CovBy.eq_or_eq` and `covBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem covBy_iff_lt_and_eq_or_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.lt, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec covBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
theorem CovBy.Ico_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ico a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_left h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Ioc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioc a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_right h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} :=
h.wcovBy.Icc_eq
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.Ioi_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioi a = Ici b := by
rw [← Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Iio_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Iio b = Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_union_Ioo_eq_Iio h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, union_empty]
theorem WCovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hcb : c < b) : c ≤ a :=
not_lt.1 fun hac => hab.2 hac hcb
theorem WCovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hac : a < c) : b ≤ c :=
not_lt.1 <| hab.2 hac
theorem CovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⋖ b) : c < b → c ≤ a :=
hab.wcovBy.le_of_lt
theorem CovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⋖ b) : a < c → b ≤ c :=
hab.wcovBy.ge_of_gt
theorem CovBy.unique_left (ha : a ⋖ c) (hb : b ⋖ c) : a = b :=
(hb.le_of_lt ha.lt).antisymm <| ha.le_of_lt hb.lt
theorem CovBy.unique_right (hb : a ⋖ b) (hc : a ⋖ c) : b = c :=
(hb.ge_of_gt hc.lt).antisymm <| hc.ge_of_gt hb.lt
/-- If `a`, `b`, `c` are consecutive and `a < x < c` then `x = b`. -/
theorem CovBy.eq_of_between {x : α} (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) (hax : a < x) (hxc : x < c) :
x = b :=
le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt fun h => hbc.2 h hxc) (le_of_not_lt <| hab.2 hax)
theorem covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, z < y ↔ z ≤ x where
mp := fun hx _z ↦ ⟨hx.le_of_lt, fun hz ↦ hz.trans_lt hx.lt⟩
mpr := fun H ↦ ⟨H.2 le_rfl, fun _z hx hz ↦ (H.1 hz).not_lt hx⟩
theorem covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, z ≤ x ↔ z < y := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left, iff_comm]
theorem covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, x < z ↔ y ≤ z := by
trans ∀ {z}, ¬ z ≤ x ↔ ¬ z < y
· simp_rw [covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left, not_iff_not]
· simp
theorem covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_right {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, y ≤ z ↔ x < z := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right, iff_comm]
alias ⟨CovBy.lt_iff_le_left, _⟩ := covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left
alias ⟨CovBy.le_iff_lt_left, _⟩ := covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left
alias ⟨CovBy.lt_iff_le_right, _⟩ := covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right
alias ⟨CovBy.le_iff_lt_right, _⟩ := covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_right
/-- If `a < b` then there exist `a' > a` and `b' < b` such that `Set.Iio a'` is strictly to the left
of `Set.Ioi b'`. -/
lemma LT.lt.exists_disjoint_Iio_Ioi (h : a < b) :
∃ a' > a, ∃ b' < b, ∀ x < a', ∀ y > b', x < y := by
by_cases h' : a ⋖ b
· exact ⟨b, h, a, h, fun x hx y hy => hx.trans_le <| h'.ge_of_gt hy⟩
· rcases h.exists_lt_lt h' with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, ha, c, hb, fun _ h₁ _ => lt_trans h₁⟩
end LinearOrder
namespace Bool
@[simp] theorem wcovBy_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b := by unfold WCovBy; decide
@[simp] theorem covBy_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a ⋖ b ↔ a < b := by unfold CovBy; decide
instance instDecidableRelWCovBy : DecidableRel (· ⩿ · : Bool → Bool → Prop) := fun _ _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ wcovBy_iff.symm
instance instDecidableRelCovBy : DecidableRel (· ⋖ · : Bool → Bool → Prop) := fun _ _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ covBy_iff.symm
end Bool
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma wcovBy_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⩿ insert x s := by
refine wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (subset_insert x s) fun t hst h2t => ?_
by_cases h : x ∈ t
· exact Or.inr (subset_antisymm h2t <| insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨h, hst⟩)
· refine Or.inl (subset_antisymm ?_ hst)
rwa [← diff_singleton_eq_self h, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_wcovBy (s : Set α) (a : α) : s \ {a} ⩿ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· convert wcovBy_insert a _
ext
simp [ha]
· simp [ha]
@[simp] lemma covBy_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⋖ insert a s :=
(wcovBy_insert _ _).covBy_of_lt <| ssubset_insert ha
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_covBy (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ {a} ⋖ s :=
⟨sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _, (sdiff_singleton_wcovBy _ _).2⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_insert (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_insert.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssuperset <| h.2 <| ssubset_insert ha).symm⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssubset fun h' ↦ h.2 h' <|
sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _).symm⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_insert : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_insert, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact covBy_insert ha⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_sdiff_singleton : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact sdiff_singleton_covBy ha⟩
end Set
section Relation
open Relation
lemma wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] : ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
ext x y; simp_rw [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, @eq_comm _ x, reflGen_iff]
lemma transGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
TransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, transGen_reflGen]
lemma reflTransGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
ReflTransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, reflTransGen_reflGen]
end Relation
namespace Prod
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β} {x y : α × β}
@[simp]
theorem swap_wcovBy_swap : x.swap ⩿ y.swap ↔ x ⩿ y :=
apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
@[simp]
theorem swap_covBy_swap : x.swap ⋖ y.swap ↔ x ⋖ y :=
apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
theorem fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy : x ⩿ y → x.1 = y.1 ∨ x.2 = y.2 := by
refine fun h => of_not_not fun hab => ?_
push_neg at hab
exact
h.2 (mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inl ⟨hab.1.lt_of_le h.1.1, le_rfl⟩)
(mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inr ⟨le_rfl, hab.2.lt_of_le h.1.2⟩)
theorem _root_.WCovBy.fst (h : x ⩿ y) : x.1 ⩿ y.1 :=
⟨h.1.1, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_left.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h₂.le, h.1.2⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.1⟩⟩
theorem _root_.WCovBy.snd (h : x ⩿ y) : x.2 ⩿ y.2 :=
⟨h.1.2, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_right.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h.1.1, h₂.le⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.2⟩⟩
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⩿ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ := by
refine ⟨WCovBy.fst, (And.imp mk_le_mk_iff_left.2) fun h c h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
have : c.2 = b := h₂.le.2.antisymm h₁.le.2
rw [← @Prod.mk.eta _ _ c, this, mk_lt_mk_iff_left] at h₁ h₂
exact h h₁ h₂
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⩿ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⩿ b₂ :=
swap_wcovBy_swap.trans mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⋖ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⋖ a₂ := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left, mk_lt_mk_iff_left]
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⋖ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⋖ b₂ := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right, mk_lt_mk_iff_right]
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff : (a₁, b₁) ⩿ (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ ⩿ b₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | rfl : a₁ = a₂ ∨ b₁ = b₂ := fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy h
· exact Or.inr ⟨mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right.1 h, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left.1 h, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨h, rfl⟩)
· exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left.2 h
· exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right.2 h
theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff : (a₁, b₁) ⋖ (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ ⋖ a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ ⋖ b₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl | rfl : a₁ = a₂ ∨ b₁ = b₂ := fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy h.wcovBy
· exact Or.inr ⟨mk_covBy_mk_iff_right.1 h, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨mk_covBy_mk_iff_left.1 h, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨h, rfl⟩)
· exact mk_covBy_mk_iff_left.2 h
· exact mk_covBy_mk_iff_right.2 h
theorem wcovBy_iff : x ⩿ y ↔ x.1 ⩿ y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ x.2 ⩿ y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 := by
cases x
cases y
exact mk_wcovBy_mk_iff
theorem covBy_iff : x ⋖ y ↔ x.1 ⋖ y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ x.2 ⋖ y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 := by
cases x
cases y
exact mk_covBy_mk_iff
end Prod
namespace WithTop
variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_wcovBy_coe : (a : WithTop α) ⩿ b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff OrderEmbedding.withTopCoe <| by
simp [WithTop.range_coe, ordConnected_Iio]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_covBy_coe : (a : WithTop α) ⋖ b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff OrderEmbedding.withTopCoe <| by
simp [WithTop.range_coe, ordConnected_Iio]
@[simp] lemma coe_covBy_top : (a : WithTop α) ⋖ ⊤ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [covBy_iff_Ioo_eq, ← image_coe_Ioi, coe_lt_top, image_eq_empty,
true_and, Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma coe_wcovBy_top : (a : WithTop α) ⩿ ⊤ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq, ← image_coe_Ioi, le_top, image_eq_empty, true_and, Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
end WithTop
namespace WithBot
| variable [Preorder α] {a b : α}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_wcovBy_coe : (a : WithBot α) ⩿ b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff OrderEmbedding.withBotCoe <| by
simp [WithBot.range_coe, ordConnected_Ioi]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_covBy_coe : (a : WithBot α) ⋖ b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff OrderEmbedding.withBotCoe <| by
| Mathlib/Order/Cover.lean | 592 | 599 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Field
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField.Adjoin.Algebra
/-!
# Splitting fields
This file introduces the notion of a splitting field of a polynomial and provides an embedding from
a splitting field to any field that splits the polynomial. A polynomial `f : K[X]` splits
over a field extension `L` of `K` if it is zero or all of its irreducible factors over `L` have
degree `1`. A field extension of `K` of a polynomial `f : K[X]` is called a splitting field
if it is the smallest field extension of `K` such that `f` splits.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.IsSplittingField`: A predicate on a field to be a splitting field of a polynomial
`f`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.IsSplittingField.lift`: An embedding of a splitting field of the polynomial `f` into
another field such that `f` splits.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {F : Type u} (K : Type v) (L : Type w)
namespace Polynomial
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Field F] [Algebra K L]
/-- Typeclass characterising splitting fields. -/
@[stacks 09HV "Predicate version"]
class IsSplittingField (f : K[X]) : Prop where
splits' : Splits (algebraMap K L) f
adjoin_rootSet' : Algebra.adjoin K (f.rootSet L : Set L) = ⊤
namespace IsSplittingField
variable {K}
theorem splits (f : K[X]) [IsSplittingField K L f] : Splits (algebraMap K L) f :=
splits'
theorem adjoin_rootSet (f : K[X]) [IsSplittingField K L f] :
Algebra.adjoin K (f.rootSet L : Set L) = ⊤ :=
adjoin_rootSet'
section ScalarTower
variable [Algebra F K] [Algebra F L] [IsScalarTower F K L]
instance map (f : F[X]) [IsSplittingField F L f] : IsSplittingField K L (f.map <| algebraMap F K) :=
⟨by rw [splits_map_iff, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]; exact splits L f,
Subalgebra.restrictScalars_injective F <| by
rw [rootSet, aroots, map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, Subalgebra.restrictScalars_top,
eq_top_iff, ← adjoin_rootSet L f, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]
exact fun x hx => @Algebra.subset_adjoin K _ _ _ _ _ _ hx⟩
theorem splits_iff (f : K[X]) [IsSplittingField K L f] :
Splits (RingHom.id K) f ↔ (⊤ : Subalgebra K L) = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← adjoin_rootSet L f, rootSet, aroots, roots_map (algebraMap K L) h,
Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]
intro y hy
classical
rw [Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_image] at hy
obtain ⟨x : K, -, hxy : algebraMap K L x = y⟩ := hy
rw [← hxy]
exact SetLike.mem_coe.2 <| Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _,
fun h => @RingEquiv.toRingHom_refl K _ ▸ RingEquiv.self_trans_symm
(RingEquiv.ofBijective _ <| Algebra.bijective_algebraMap_iff.2 h) ▸ by
rw [RingEquiv.toRingHom_trans]
exact splits_comp_of_splits _ _ (splits L f)⟩
theorem mul (f g : F[X]) (hf : f ≠ 0) (hg : g ≠ 0) [IsSplittingField F K f]
[IsSplittingField K L (g.map <| algebraMap F K)] : IsSplittingField F L (f * g) :=
⟨(IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq F K L).symm ▸
splits_mul _ (splits_comp_of_splits _ _ (splits K f))
((splits_map_iff _ _).1 (splits L <| g.map <| algebraMap F K)), by
classical
rw [rootSet, aroots_mul (mul_ne_zero hf hg),
Multiset.toFinset_add, Finset.coe_union, Algebra.adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin,
aroots_def, aroots_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq F K L, ← map_map,
roots_map (algebraMap K L) ((splits_id_iff_splits <| algebraMap F K).2 <| splits K f),
Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.coe_image, Algebra.adjoin_algebraMap, ← rootSet, adjoin_rootSet,
Algebra.map_top, IsScalarTower.adjoin_range_toAlgHom, ← map_map, ← rootSet, adjoin_rootSet,
Subalgebra.restrictScalars_top]⟩
end ScalarTower
open Classical in
/-- Splitting field of `f` embeds into any field that splits `f`. -/
def lift [Algebra K F] (f : K[X]) [IsSplittingField K L f]
(hf : Splits (algebraMap K F) f) : L →ₐ[K] F :=
if hf0 : f = 0 then
(Algebra.ofId K F).comp <|
(Algebra.botEquiv K L : (⊥ : Subalgebra K L) →ₐ[K] K).comp <| by
rw [← (splits_iff L f).1 (show f.Splits (RingHom.id K) from hf0.symm ▸ splits_zero _)]
exact Algebra.toTop
else AlgHom.comp (by
rw [← adjoin_rootSet L f]
exact Classical.choice (lift_of_splits _ fun y hy =>
have : aeval y f = 0 := (eval₂_eq_eval_map _).trans <|
(mem_roots <| map_ne_zero hf0).1 (Multiset.mem_toFinset.mp hy)
⟨IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨f, hf0, this⟩,
splits_of_splits_of_dvd _ hf0 hf <| minpoly.dvd _ _ this⟩)) Algebra.toTop
theorem finiteDimensional (f : K[X]) [IsSplittingField K L f] : FiniteDimensional K L := by
classical
exact ⟨@Algebra.top_toSubmodule K L _ _ _ ▸
adjoin_rootSet L f ▸ fg_adjoin_of_finite (Finset.finite_toSet _) fun y hy ↦
if hf : f = 0 then by rw [hf, rootSet_zero] at hy; cases hy
else IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨f, hf, (mem_rootSet'.mp hy).2⟩⟩
theorem of_algEquiv [Algebra K F] (p : K[X]) (f : F ≃ₐ[K] L) [IsSplittingField K F p] :
IsSplittingField K L p := by
constructor
· rw [← f.toAlgHom.comp_algebraMap]
exact splits_comp_of_splits _ _ (splits F p)
· rw [← (AlgHom.range_eq_top f.toAlgHom).mpr f.surjective,
adjoin_rootSet_eq_range (splits F p), adjoin_rootSet F p]
theorem adjoin_rootSet_eq_range [Algebra K F] (f : K[X]) [IsSplittingField K L f] (i : L →ₐ[K] F) :
Algebra.adjoin K (rootSet f F) = i.range :=
(Polynomial.adjoin_rootSet_eq_range (splits L f) i).mpr (adjoin_rootSet L f)
end IsSplittingField
end Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {K L} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] {p : K[X]} {F : IntermediateField K L}
theorem IntermediateField.splits_of_splits (h : p.Splits (algebraMap K L))
(hF : ∀ x ∈ p.rootSet L, x ∈ F) : p.Splits (algebraMap K F) := by
classical
simp_rw [← F.fieldRange_val, rootSet_def, Finset.mem_coe, Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hF
exact splits_of_comp _ F.val.toRingHom h hF
theorem IntermediateField.splits_iff_mem (h : p.Splits (algebraMap K L)) :
p.Splits (algebraMap K F) ↔ ∀ x ∈ p.rootSet L, x ∈ F := by
refine ⟨?_, IntermediateField.splits_of_splits h⟩
intro hF
rw [← Polynomial.image_rootSet hF F.val, Set.forall_mem_image]
exact fun x _ ↦ x.2
theorem IsIntegral.mem_intermediateField_of_minpoly_splits {x : L} (int : IsIntegral K x)
{F : IntermediateField K L} (h : Splits (algebraMap K F) (minpoly K x)) : x ∈ F := by
rw [← F.fieldRange_val]; exact int.mem_range_algebraMap_of_minpoly_splits h
/-- Characterize `IsSplittingField` with `IntermediateField.adjoin` instead of `Algebra.adjoin`. -/
theorem isSplittingField_iff_intermediateField : p.IsSplittingField K L ↔
| p.Splits (algebraMap K L) ∧ IntermediateField.adjoin K (p.rootSet L) = ⊤ := by
rw [← IntermediateField.toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
IntermediateField.adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun _ ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SplittingField/IsSplittingField.lean | 163 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.TypeStar
/-!
# Nontrivial types
A type is *nontrivial* if it contains at least two elements. This is useful in particular for rings
(where it is equivalent to the fact that zero is different from one) and for vector spaces
(where it is equivalent to the fact that the dimension is positive).
We introduce a typeclass `Nontrivial` formalizing this property.
Basic results about nontrivial types are in `Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Basic`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that a type is not reduced to a single element. In rings,
this is equivalent to `0 ≠ 1`. In vector spaces, this is equivalent to positive dimension. -/
class Nontrivial (α : Type*) : Prop where
/-- In a nontrivial type, there exists a pair of distinct terms. -/
exists_pair_ne : ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.exists_pair_ne, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem exists_pair_ne (α : Type*) [Nontrivial α] : ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y :=
Nontrivial.exists_pair_ne
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.exists_ne [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x := by
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨y, y', h⟩
by_cases hx : x = y
· rw [← hx] at h
exact ⟨y', h.symm⟩
· exact ⟨y, Ne.symm hx⟩
open Classical in
theorem exists_ne [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x := Decidable.exists_ne x
-- `x` and `y` are explicit here, as they are often needed to guide typechecking of `h`.
theorem nontrivial_of_ne (x y : α) (h : x ≠ y) : Nontrivial α :=
⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (x : α) : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ y, y ≠ x :=
⟨fun h ↦ @exists_ne α h x, fun ⟨_, hy⟩ ↦ nontrivial_of_ne _ _ hy⟩
instance : Nontrivial Prop :=
⟨⟨True, False, true_ne_false⟩⟩
/-- See Note [lower instance priority]
Note that since this and `instNonemptyOfInhabited` are the most "obvious" way to find a nonempty
instance if no direct instance can be found, we give this a higher priority than the usual `100`.
-/
instance (priority := 500) Nontrivial.to_nonempty [Nontrivial α] : Nonempty α :=
let ⟨x, _⟩ := _root_.exists_pair_ne α
⟨x⟩
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton α ↔ ∀ x y : α, x = y :=
⟨by
intro h
exact Subsingleton.elim, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton : ¬Nontrivial α ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [nontrivial_iff, subsingleton_iff, not_exists, Classical.not_not]
theorem not_nontrivial (α) [Subsingleton α] : ¬Nontrivial α :=
fun ⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩ ↦ h <| Subsingleton.elim x y
theorem not_subsingleton (α) [Nontrivial α] : ¬Subsingleton α :=
fun _ => not_nontrivial _ ‹_›
lemma not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial : ¬ Subsingleton α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
/-- A type is either a subsingleton or nontrivial. -/
theorem subsingleton_or_nontrivial (α : Type*) : Subsingleton α ∨ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, or_comm]
exact Classical.em _
theorem false_of_nontrivial_of_subsingleton (α : Type*) [Nontrivial α] [Subsingleton α] : False :=
not_nontrivial _ ‹_›
/-- Pullback a `Nontrivial` instance along a surjective function. -/
protected theorem Function.Surjective.nontrivial [Nontrivial β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Nontrivial α := by
rcases exists_pair_ne β with ⟨x, y, h⟩
rcases hf x with ⟨x', hx'⟩
rcases hf y with ⟨y', hy'⟩
have : x' ≠ y' := by
refine fun H ↦ h ?_
rw [← hx', ← hy', H]
exact ⟨⟨x', y', this⟩⟩
namespace Bool
instance : Nontrivial Bool :=
⟨⟨true, false, nofun⟩⟩
end Bool
| Mathlib/Logic/Nontrivial/Defs.lean | 109 | 117 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZeta
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeriesComplex
/-!
# Definition of the Riemann zeta function
## Main definitions:
* `riemannZeta`: the Riemann zeta function `ζ : ℂ → ℂ`.
* `completedRiemannZeta`: the completed zeta function `Λ : ℂ → ℂ`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (away from the poles of `Γ(s / 2)`).
* `completedRiemannZeta₀`: the entire function `Λ₀` satisfying
`Λ₀(s) = Λ(s) + 1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s` wherever the RHS is defined.
Note that mathematically `ζ(s)` is undefined at `s = 1`, while `Λ(s)` is undefined at both `s = 0`
and `s = 1`. Our construction assigns some values at these points; exact formulae involving the
Euler-Mascheroni constant will follow in a subsequent PR.
## Main results:
* `differentiable_completedZeta₀` : the function `Λ₀(s)` is entire.
* `differentiableAt_completedZeta` : the function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and
`s = 1`.
* `differentiableAt_riemannZeta` : the function `ζ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 1`.
* `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow` : for `1 < re s`, we have
`ζ(s) = ∑' (n : ℕ), 1 / (n + 1) ^ s`.
* `completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub`, `completedRiemannZeta_one_sub`, and `riemannZeta_one_sub` :
functional equation relating values at `s` and `1 - s`
For special-value formulae expressing `ζ (2 * k)` and `ζ (1 - 2 * k)` in terms of Bernoulli numbers
see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaValues`. For computation of the constant term as
`s → 1`, see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.ZetaAsymp`.
## Outline of proofs:
These results are mostly special cases of more general results for even Hurwitz zeta functions
proved in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaEven`.
-/
open CharZero Set Filter HurwitzZeta
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp
open scoped Topology Real
noncomputable section
/-!
## Definition of the completed Riemann zeta
-/
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function with its poles removed, `Λ(s) + 1 / s - 1 / (s - 1)`. -/
def completedRiemannZeta₀ (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function, `Λ(s)`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (up to a minor correction at `s = 0`). -/
def completedRiemannZeta (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀,
hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma completedRiemannZeta_eq (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s - 1 / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
simp_rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, if_true]
/-- The modified completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s) + 1 / s + 1 / (1 - s)` is entire. -/
theorem differentiable_completedZeta₀ : Differentiable ℂ completedRiemannZeta₀ :=
differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_completedZeta {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ completedRiemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 (Or.inl hs) hs'
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ₀`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ₀(1 - s) = Λ₀ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta₀ (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero, ← completedCosZeta₀_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub]
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ (1 - s) = Λ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero, ← completedCosZeta_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub]
/-- The residue of `Λ(s)` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedRiemannZeta_residue_one :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedRiemannZeta s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one 0
/-!
## The un-completed Riemann zeta function
-/
/-- The Riemann zeta function `ζ(s)`. -/
def riemannZeta := hurwitzZetaEven 0
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZetaEven_zero : hurwitzZetaEven 0 = riemannZeta := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.cosZeta_zero : cosZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
simp_rw [cosZeta, riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, if_true, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero,
completedCosZeta_zero]
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZeta_zero : hurwitzZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
simpa [hurwitzZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_zero] using hurwitzZetaOdd_neg 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.expZeta_zero : expZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
rw [expZeta, cosZeta_zero, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro I_ne_zero, false_or,
← eq_neg_self_iff, ← sinZeta_neg, neg_zero]
/-- The Riemann zeta function is differentiable away from `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_riemannZeta {s : ℂ} (hs' : s ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ riemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven _ hs'
/-- We have `ζ(0) = -1 / 2`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_zero : riemannZeta 0 = -1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_self, if_true]
lemma riemannZeta_def_of_ne_zero {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
riemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta s / Gammaℝ s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne hs, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the zeta function. -/
theorem riemannZeta_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one (n : ℕ) : riemannZeta (-2 * (n + 1)) = 0 :=
hurwitzZetaEven_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one 0 n
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `ζ`: if `1 - s ∉ ℕ`, then we have
`ζ (1 - s) = 2 ^ (1 - s) * π ^ (-s) * Γ s * sin (π * (1 - s) / 2) * ζ s`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_one_sub {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ n : ℕ, s ≠ -n) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
riemannZeta (1 - s) = 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s * cos (π * s / 2) * riemannZeta s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_one_sub 0 hs (Or.inr hs'), cosZeta_zero, hurwitzZetaEven_zero]
|
/-- A formal statement of the **Riemann hypothesis** – constructing a term of this type is worth a
million dollars. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/RiemannZeta.lean | 153 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Pseudo.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
/-!
## Cauchy sequences in (pseudo-)metric spaces
Various results on Cauchy sequences in (pseudo-)metric spaces, including
* `Metric.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto` A pseudo-metric space is complete iff each Cauchy sequences
converges to some limit point.
* `cauchySeq_bdd`: a Cauchy sequence on the natural numbers is bounded
* various characterisation of Cauchy and uniformly Cauchy sequences
## Tags
metric, pseudo_metric, Cauchy sequence
-/
open Filter
open scoped Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `dist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem Metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → Real) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => dist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A pseudo-metric space is complete iff every Cauchy sequence converges. -/
theorem Metric.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
EMetric.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
section CauchySeq
variable [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β]
/-- In a pseudometric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the distance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem Metric.cauchySeq_iff {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the pseudometric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem Metric.cauchySeq_iff' {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.cauchySeq_iff'
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudometric space, uniform Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that,
eventually, the distance between all its elements is uniformly, arbitrarily small. -/
theorem Metric.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff {γ : Type*} {F : β → γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
UniformCauchySeqOn F atTop s ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ),
∃ N : β, ∀ m ≥ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ∀ x ∈ s, dist (F m x) (F n x) < ε := by
constructor
· intro h ε hε
let u := { a : α × α | dist a.fst a.snd < ε }
have hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α := Metric.mem_uniformity_dist.mpr ⟨ε, hε, by simp [u]⟩
rw [← Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self' (p := fun m =>
∀ x ∈ s, dist (F m.fst x) (F m.snd x) < ε)]
specialize h u hu
rw [prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at h
exact h.mono fun n h x hx => h x hx
· intro h u hu
rcases Metric.mem_uniformity_dist.mp hu with ⟨ε, hε, hab⟩
rcases h ε hε with ⟨N, hN⟩
rw [prod_atTop_atTop_eq, eventually_atTop]
use (N, N)
intro b hb x hx
rcases hb with ⟨hbl, hbr⟩
exact hab (hN b.fst hbl.ge b.snd hbr.ge x hx)
/-- If the distance between `s n` and `s m`, `n ≤ m` is bounded above by `b n`
and `b` converges to zero, then `s` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0' {s : β → α} (b : β → ℝ)
(h : ∀ n m : β, n ≤ m → dist (s n) (s m) ≤ b n) (h₀ : Tendsto b atTop (𝓝 0)) : CauchySeq s :=
Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.2 fun ε ε0 => (h₀.eventually (gt_mem_nhds ε0)).exists.imp fun N hN n hn =>
calc dist (s n) (s N) = dist (s N) (s n) := dist_comm _ _
_ ≤ b N := h _ _ hn
_ < ε := hN
/-- If the distance between `s n` and `s m`, `n, m ≥ N` is bounded above by `b N`
and `b` converges to zero, then `s` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0 {s : β → α} (b : β → ℝ)
(h : ∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) (h₀ : Tendsto b atTop (𝓝 0)) :
CauchySeq s :=
cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0' b (fun _n _m hnm => h _ _ _ le_rfl hnm) h₀
/-- A Cauchy sequence on the natural numbers is bounded. -/
theorem cauchySeq_bdd {u : ℕ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ m n, dist (u m) (u n) < R := by
rcases Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.1 hu 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨N, hN⟩
rsuffices ⟨R, R0, H⟩ : ∃ R > 0, ∀ n, dist (u n) (u N) < R
· exact ⟨_, add_pos R0 R0, fun m n =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle_right _ _ _) (add_lt_add (H m) (H n))⟩
let R := Finset.sup (Finset.range N) fun n => nndist (u n) (u N)
refine ⟨↑R + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos R.2 zero_lt_one, fun n => ?_⟩
rcases le_or_lt N n with h | h
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le (hN _ h) (le_add_of_nonneg_left R.2)
· have : _ ≤ R := Finset.le_sup (Finset.mem_range.2 h)
exact lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one)
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0 {s : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq s ↔
∃ b : ℕ → ℝ,
(∀ n, 0 ≤ b n) ∧
(∀ n m N : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) ∧ Tendsto b atTop (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun hs => by
/- `s` is a Cauchy sequence. The sequence `b` will be constructed by taking
the supremum of the distances between `s n` and `s m` for `n m ≥ N`.
First, we prove that all these distances are bounded, as otherwise the Sup
| would not make sense. -/
let S N := (fun p : ℕ × ℕ => dist (s p.1) (s p.2)) '' { p | p.1 ≥ N ∧ p.2 ≥ N }
have hS : ∀ N, ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ S N, y ≤ x := by
rcases cauchySeq_bdd hs with ⟨R, -, hR⟩
refine fun N => ⟨R, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨⟨m, n⟩, _, rfl⟩
exact le_of_lt (hR m n)
-- Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
have ub : ∀ m n N, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → dist (s m) (s n) ≤ sSup (S N) := fun m n N hm hn =>
le_csSup (hS N) ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨hm, hn⟩, rfl⟩
have S0m : ∀ n, (0 : ℝ) ∈ S n := fun n => ⟨⟨n, n⟩, ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩, dist_self _⟩
have S0 := fun n => le_csSup (hS n) (S0m n)
-- Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
refine ⟨fun N => sSup (S N), S0, ub, Metric.tendsto_atTop.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_⟩
refine (Metric.cauchySeq_iff.1 hs (ε / 2) (half_pos ε0)).imp fun N hN n hn => ?_
rw [Real.dist_0_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (S0 n)]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (csSup_le ⟨_, S0m _⟩ ?_) (half_lt_self ε0)
rintro _ ⟨⟨m', n'⟩, ⟨hm', hn'⟩, rfl⟩
exact le_of_lt (hN _ (le_trans hn hm') _ (le_trans hn hn')),
fun ⟨b, _, b_bound, b_lim⟩ => cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0 b b_bound b_lim⟩
lemma Metric.exists_subseq_bounded_of_cauchySeq (u : ℕ → α) (hu : CauchySeq u) (b : ℕ → ℝ)
(hb : ∀ n, 0 < b n) :
∃ f : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono f ∧ ∀ n, ∀ m ≥ f n, dist (u m) (u (f n)) < b n := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff] at hu
have hu' : ∀ k, ∀ᶠ (n : ℕ) in atTop, ∀ m ≥ n, dist (u m) (u n) < b k := by
intro k
rw [eventually_atTop]
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hu (b k) (hb k)
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Cauchy.lean | 128 | 156 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ClassGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Group law on Weierstrass curves
This file proves that the nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve form an abelian group
under the geometric group law defined in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` given by a Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0` in
affine coordinates. As in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`, the set of
nonsingular rational points `W⟮F⟯` of `W` consist of the unique point at infinity `𝓞` and
nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. With this description, there is an addition-preserving injection
between `W⟮F⟯` and the ideal class group of the *affine coordinate ring*
`F[W] := F[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of `W`. This is given by mapping `𝓞` to the trivial ideal class and a
nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` to the ideal class of the invertible ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩`.
Proving that this is well-defined and preserves addition reduces to equalities of integral ideals
checked in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_neg_mul` and in
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal` via explicit ideal computations.
Now `F[W]` is a free rank two `F[X]`-algebra with basis `{1, Y}`, so every element of `F[W]` is of
the form `p + qY` for some `p, q` in `F[X]`, and there is an algebra norm `N : F[W] → F[X]`.
Injectivity can then be shown by computing the degree of such a norm `N(p + qY)` in two different
ways, which is done in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis` and in the
auxiliary lemmas in the proof of `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing`: the coordinate ring `F[W]` of a Weierstrass curve `W`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.basis`: the power basis of `F[W]` over `F[X]`.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.instIsDomainCoordinateRing`: the affine coordinate ring
of a Weierstrass curve is an integral domain.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis`: the degree of the norm of an
element in the affine coordinate ring in terms of its power basis.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`: the type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine
coordinates forms an abelian group under addition.
## References
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol268-itp2023/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6.pdf
## Tags
elliptic curve, group law, class group
-/
open Ideal Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow])
universe u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve.Affine
/-! ## Weierstrass curves in affine coordinates -/
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : Affine R) (f : R →+* S)
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, this is a `def` under a `derive comm_ring` tag.
-- This generates a reducible instance of `comm_ring` for `coordinate_ring`. In certain
-- circumstances this might be extremely slow, because all instances in its definition are unified
-- exponentially many times. In this case, one solution is to manually add the local attribute
-- `local attribute [irreducible] coordinate_ring.comm_ring` to block this type-level unification.
-- In Lean 4, this is no longer an issue and is now an `abbrev`. See Zulip thread:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/.E2.9C.94.20class_group.2Emk
/-- The affine coordinate ring `R[W] := R[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev CoordinateRing : Type u :=
AdjoinRoot W.polynomial
/-- The function field `R(W) := Frac(R[W])` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev FunctionField : Type u :=
FractionRing W.CoordinateRing
namespace CoordinateRing
section Algebra
/-! ### The coordinate ring as an `R[X]`-algebra -/
noncomputable instance : Algebra R W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R
noncomputable instance : Algebra R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R[X]
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.isScalarTower R R[X] _
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton W.CoordinateRing :=
Module.subsingleton R[X] _
/-- The natural ring homomorphism mapping `R[X][Y]` to `R[W]`. -/
noncomputable abbrev mk : R[X][Y] →+* W.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.mk W.polynomial
/-- The power basis `{1, Y}` for `R[W]` over `R[X]`. -/
protected noncomputable def basis : Basis (Fin 2) R[X] W.CoordinateRing := by
classical exact (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).by_cases (fun _ => default) fun _ =>
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).basis.reindex <| finCongr W.natDegree_polynomial
lemma basis_apply (n : Fin 2) :
CoordinateRing.basis W n = (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).gen ^ (n : ℕ) := by
classical
nontriviality R
rw [CoordinateRing.basis, Or.by_cases, dif_neg <| not_subsingleton R, Basis.reindex_apply,
PowerBasis.basis_eq_pow]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma basis_zero : CoordinateRing.basis W 0 = 1 := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_zero _
@[simp]
lemma basis_one : CoordinateRing.basis W 1 = mk W Y := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_one _
lemma coe_basis : (CoordinateRing.basis W : Fin 2 → W.CoordinateRing) = ![1, mk W Y] := by
ext n
fin_cases n
exacts [basis_zero W, basis_one W]
variable {W} in
lemma smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) : x • y = mk W (C x) * y :=
(algebraMap_smul W.CoordinateRing x y).symm
variable {W} in
lemma smul_basis_eq_zero {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = 0) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 := by
have h := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.mp (CoordinateRing.basis W).linearIndependent ![p, q]
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, basis_zero, Fin.sum_univ_one, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨h hpq 0, h hpq 1⟩
variable {W} in
lemma exists_smul_basis_eq (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
∃ p q : R[X], p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = x := by
have h := (CoordinateRing.basis W).sum_equivFun x
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_one, basis_zero, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
lemma smul_basis_mul_C (y : R[X]) (p q : R[X]) :
(p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W (C y) =
(p * y) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + (q * y) • mk W Y := by
simp only [smul, map_mul]
ring1
lemma smul_basis_mul_Y (p q : R[X]) : (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W Y =
(q * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) +
(p - q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)) • mk W Y := by
have Y_sq : mk W Y ^ 2 =
mk W (C (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) * Y) := by
exact AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [polynomial]; ring1⟩
simp only [smul, add_mul, mul_assoc, ← sq, Y_sq, C_sub, map_sub, C_mul, map_mul]
ring1
| /-- The ring homomorphism `R[W] →+* S[W.map f]` induced by a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`. -/
noncomputable def map : W.CoordinateRing →+* (W.map f).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.lift ((AdjoinRoot.of _).comp <| mapRingHom f)
((AdjoinRoot.root (WeierstrassCurve.map W f).toAffine.polynomial)) <| by
rw [← eval₂_map, ← map_polynomial, AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean | 172 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Split polynomials
A polynomial `f : K[X]` splits over a field extension `L` of `K` if it is zero or all of its
irreducible factors over `L` have degree `1`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Splits i f`: A predicate on a homomorphism `i : K →+* L` from a commutative ring to a
field and a polynomial `f` saying that `f.map i` is zero or all of its irreducible factors over
`L` have degree `1`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
section Splits
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
/-- A polynomial `Splits` iff it is zero or all of its irreducible factors have `degree` 1. -/
def Splits (f : K[X]) : Prop :=
f.map i = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
@[simp]
theorem splits_zero : Splits i (0 : K[X]) :=
Or.inl (Polynomial.map_zero i)
theorem splits_of_map_eq_C {f : K[X]} {a : L} (h : f.map i = C a) : Splits i f :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if ha : a = 0 then Or.inl (h.trans (ha.symm ▸ C_0))
else
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ =>
absurd hg.1 <|
Classical.not_not.2 <|
isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 <| by
have := congr_arg degree hp
rw [h, degree_C ha, degree_mul, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 0,
Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
@[simp]
theorem splits_C (a : K) : Splits i (C a) :=
splits_of_map_eq_C i (map_C i)
theorem splits_of_map_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree (f.map i) = 1) : Splits i f :=
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ => by
have := congr_arg degree hp
simp [Nat.WithBot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 1,
mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this
tauto
theorem splits_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
if hif : degree (f.map i) ≤ 0 then splits_of_map_eq_C i (degree_le_zero_iff.mp hif)
else by
push_neg at hif
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.orderSucc_coe, Nat.succ_eq_succ] at hif
exact splits_of_map_degree_eq_one i ((degree_map_le.trans hf).antisymm hif)
theorem splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i hf.le
theorem splits_of_natDegree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i (degree_le_of_natDegree_le hf)
theorem splits_of_natDegree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_natDegree_le_one i (le_of_eq hf)
theorem splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hf : Splits i f) (hg : Splits i g) : Splits i (f * g) :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if h : (f * g).map i = 0 then Or.inl h
else
Or.inr @fun p hp hpf =>
((irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g by convert hpf; rw [Polynomial.map_mul])).elim
(hf.resolve_left (fun hf => by simp [hf] at h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (fun hg => by simp [hg] at h) hp)
theorem splits_of_splits_mul' {f g : K[X]} (hfg : (f * g).map i ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
⟨Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
theorem splits_map_iff (j : L →+* F) {f : K[X]} : Splits j (f.map i) ↔ Splits (j.comp i) f := by
simp [Splits, Polynomial.map_map]
theorem splits_one : Splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
theorem splits_of_isUnit [IsDomain K] {u : K[X]} (hu : IsUnit u) : u.Splits i :=
(isUnit_iff.mp hu).choose_spec.2 ▸ splits_C _ _
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : K} : (X - C x).Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ <| degree_X_sub_C_le _
theorem splits_X : X.Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ degree_X_le
theorem splits_prod {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ => splits_one i) fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht; rw [Finset.prod_insert hat]
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
theorem splits_pow {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (n : ℕ) : (f ^ n).Splits i := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact splits_prod i fun j _ => hf
theorem splits_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).Splits i :=
splits_pow i (splits_X i) n
theorem splits_id_iff_splits {f : K[X]} : (f.map i).Splits (RingHom.id L) ↔ f.Splits i := by
rw [splits_map_iff, RingHom.id_comp]
variable {i}
theorem Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : (p.map i).degree ≤ 1)
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp p).Splits i := by
by_cases hzero : map i (f.comp p) = 0
· exact Or.inl hzero
cases h with
| inl h0 =>
exact Or.inl <| map_comp i _ _ ▸ h0.symm ▸ zero_comp
| inr h =>
right
intro g irr dvd
rw [map_comp] at dvd hzero
cases lt_or_eq_of_le hd with
| inl hd =>
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero (Nat.WithBot.lt_one_iff_le_zero.mp hd), comp_C] at dvd hzero
refine False.elim (irr.1 (isUnit_of_dvd_unit dvd ?_))
simpa using hzero
| inr hd =>
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr
(ne_zero_of_degree_gt (n := ⊥) (by rw [hd]; decide)))
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hd, dvd_comp_C_mul_X_add_C_iff _ _] at dvd
have := h (irr.map (algEquivCMulXAddC _ _).symm) dvd
rw [degree_eq_natDegree irr.ne_zero]
rwa [algEquivCMulXAddC_symm_apply, ← comp_eq_aeval,
degree_eq_natDegree (fun h => WithBot.bot_ne_one (h ▸ this)),
natDegree_comp, natDegree_C_mul (invertibleInvOf.ne_zero),
natDegree_X_sub_C, mul_one] at this
theorem splits_iff_comp_splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : (p.map i).degree = 1) :
f.Splits i ↔ (f.comp p).Splits i := by
rw [← splits_id_iff_splits, ← splits_id_iff_splits (f := f.comp p), map_comp]
refine ⟨fun h => Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one
(le_of_eq (map_id (R := L) ▸ hd)) h, fun h => ?_⟩
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr
(ne_zero_of_degree_gt (n := ⊥) (by rw [hd]; decide)))
have : (map i f) = ((map i f).comp (map i p)).comp ((C ⅟ (map i p).leadingCoeff *
(X - C ((map i p).coeff 0)))) := by
rw [comp_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one hd]
simp only [coeff_map, invOf_eq_inv, mul_sub, ← C_mul, add_comp, mul_comp, C_comp, X_comp,
← mul_assoc]
simp
refine this ▸ Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one ?_ h
simp [degree_C (inv_ne_zero (Invertible.ne_zero (a := (map i p).leadingCoeff)))]
/--
This is a weaker variant of `Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one`,
but its conditions are easier to check.
-/
theorem Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} {p : K[X]} (hd : p.degree ≤ 1)
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp p).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_map_degree_le_one (degree_map_le.trans hd) h
theorem Splits.comp_X_sub_C (a : K) {f : K[X]}
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp (X - C a)).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one (degree_X_sub_C_le _) h
theorem Splits.comp_X_add_C (a : K) {f : K[X]}
(h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp (X + C a)).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one (by simpa using degree_X_sub_C_le (-a)) h
theorem Splits.comp_neg_X {f : K[X]} (h : f.Splits i) : (f.comp (-X)).Splits i :=
Splits.comp_of_degree_le_one (by simpa using degree_X_sub_C_le (0 : K)) h
variable (i)
theorem exists_root_of_splits' {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : degree (f.map i) ≠ 0) :
∃ x, eval₂ i x f = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if hf0' : f.map i = 0 then by simp [eval₂_eq_eval_map, hf0']
else
let ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
WfDvdMonoid.exists_irreducible_factor
(show ¬IsUnit (f.map i) from mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.1 hf0) hf0'
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (hs.resolve_left hf0' hg.1 hg.2)
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hg.2
⟨x, by rw [← eval_map, hi, eval_mul, show _ = _ from hx, zero_mul]⟩
theorem roots_ne_zero_of_splits' {f : K[X]} (hs : Splits i f) (hf0 : natDegree (f.map i) ≠ 0) :
(f.map i).roots ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_root_of_splits' i hs fun h => hf0 <| natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h
fun h => by
rw [← eval_map] at hx
have : f.map i ≠ 0 := by intro; simp_all
cases h.subst ((mem_roots this).2 hx)
/-- Pick a root of a polynomial that splits. See `rootOfSplits` for polynomials over a field
which has simpler assumptions. -/
def rootOfSplits' {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (hfd : (f.map i).degree ≠ 0) : L :=
Classical.choose <| exists_root_of_splits' i hf hfd
theorem map_rootOfSplits' {f : K[X]} (hf : f.Splits i) (hfd) :
f.eval₂ i (rootOfSplits' i hf hfd) = 0 :=
Classical.choose_spec <| exists_root_of_splits' i hf hfd
theorem natDegree_eq_card_roots' {p : K[X]} {i : K →+* L} (hsplit : Splits i p) :
(p.map i).natDegree = Multiset.card (p.map i).roots := by
by_cases hp : p.map i = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, roots_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
obtain ⟨q, he, hd, hr⟩ := exists_prod_multiset_X_sub_C_mul (p.map i)
rw [← splits_id_iff_splits, ← he] at hsplit
rw [← he] at hp
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun h => hp (by rw [h, mul_zero])
rw [← hd, add_eq_left]
by_contra h
| have h' : (map (RingHom.id L) q).natDegree ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
have := roots_ne_zero_of_splits' (RingHom.id L) (splits_of_splits_mul' _ ?_ hsplit).2 h'
· rw [map_id] at this
exact this hr
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Splits.lean | 246 | 249 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Tilted
/-!
# Log-likelihood Ratio
The likelihood ratio between two measures `μ` and `ν` is their Radon-Nikodym derivative
`μ.rnDeriv ν`. The logarithm of that function is often used instead: this is the log-likelihood
ratio.
This file contains a definition of the log-likelihood ratio (llr) and its properties.
## Main definitions
* `llr μ ν`: Log-Likelihood Ratio between `μ` and `ν`, defined as the function
`x ↦ log (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal`.
-/
open Real
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Log-Likelihood Ratio between two measures. -/
noncomputable def llr (μ ν : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ := log (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal
lemma llr_def (μ ν : Measure α) : llr μ ν = fun x ↦ log (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := rfl
lemma llr_self (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : llr μ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
filter_upwards [μ.rnDeriv_self] with a ha using by simp [llr, ha]
lemma exp_llr (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
(fun x ↦ exp (llr μ ν x))
=ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ if μ.rnDeriv ν x = 0 then 1 else (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν] with x hx
by_cases h_zero : μ.rnDeriv ν x = 0
· simp only [llr, h_zero, ENNReal.toReal_zero, log_zero, exp_zero, ite_true]
· rw [llr, exp_log, if_neg h_zero]
exact ENNReal.toReal_pos h_zero hx.ne
lemma exp_llr_of_ac (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] [Measure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν]
(hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
(fun x ↦ exp (llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le (exp_llr μ ν), Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν] with x hx_eq hx_pos
rw [hx_eq, if_neg hx_pos.ne']
lemma exp_llr_of_ac' (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : ν ≪ μ) :
(fun x ↦ exp (llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [exp_llr μ ν, Measure.rnDeriv_pos' hμν] with x hx hx_pos
rwa [if_neg hx_pos.ne'] at hx
lemma neg_llr [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
- llr μ ν =ᵐ[μ] llr ν μ := by
filter_upwards [Measure.inv_rnDeriv hμν] with x hx
rw [Pi.neg_apply, llr, llr, ← log_inv, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv]
congr
lemma exp_neg_llr [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
(fun x ↦ exp (- llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (ν.rnDeriv μ x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [neg_llr hμν, exp_llr_of_ac' ν μ hμν] with x hx hx_exp_log
rw [Pi.neg_apply] at hx
rw [hx, hx_exp_log]
lemma exp_neg_llr' [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : ν ≪ μ) :
(fun x ↦ exp (- llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ (ν.rnDeriv μ x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [neg_llr hμν, exp_llr_of_ac ν μ hμν] with x hx hx_exp_log
rw [Pi.neg_apply, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hx
rw [← hx, hx_exp_log]
@[measurability, fun_prop]
lemma measurable_llr (μ ν : Measure α) : Measurable (llr μ ν) :=
(Measure.measurable_rnDeriv μ ν).ennreal_toReal.log
@[measurability]
lemma stronglyMeasurable_llr (μ ν : Measure α) : StronglyMeasurable (llr μ ν) :=
(measurable_llr μ ν).stronglyMeasurable
lemma llr_smul_left [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [Measure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν]
(hμν : μ ≪ ν) (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) :
llr (c • μ) ν =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ llr μ ν x + log c.toReal := by
simp only [llr, llr_def]
have h := Measure.rnDeriv_smul_left_of_ne_top μ ν hc_ne_top
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le h, Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν, hμν.ae_le (Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν)]
with x hx_eq hx_pos hx_ne_top
rw [hx_eq]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul]
rw [log_mul]
rotate_left
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
simp [hc, hc_ne_top]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
| simp [hx_pos.ne', hx_ne_top.ne]
ring
lemma llr_smul_right [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [Measure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν]
(hμν : μ ≪ ν) (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) :
llr μ (c • ν) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ llr μ ν x - log c.toReal := by
simp only [llr, llr_def]
have h := Measure.rnDeriv_smul_right_of_ne_top μ ν hc hc_ne_top
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le h, Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν, hμν.ae_le (Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν)]
with x hx_eq hx_pos hx_ne_top
rw [hx_eq]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul]
rw [log_mul]
rotate_left
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
simp [hc, hc_ne_top]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/LogLikelihoodRatio.lean | 100 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r ⟨typein r a, typein_lt_type r a⟩ = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
(enum _).map_rel_iff
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
¬r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₂ ≤ o₁ := by
rw [enum_lt_enum (r := r), not_lt]
-- TODO: generalize to other well-orders
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type (· < ·))} :
enum (· < ·) o₁ ≤ enum (α := a.toType) (· < ·) o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ := by
rw [← enum_le_enum, not_lt]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
enum r o₁ = enum r o₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq _
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r ⟨0, h0⟩) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.toType) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, type_toType _ ▸ h0⟩ ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hs⟩ := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (g.transRelIso f)]; rfl
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hr.trans_eq (Quotient.sound ⟨f⟩)⟩ :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.toType`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp]
noncomputable def enumIsoToType (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.toType where
toFun x := enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨x.1, type_toType _ ▸ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv _ := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := enum_le_enum' _
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio o) :=
⟨_, ⟨(enumIsoToType _).toEquiv⟩⟩
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_union_right]
infer_instance
instance small_Ico (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `o ≠ 0`. -/
def toTypeOrderBot {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' (by rwa [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero])
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
@[deprecated "use toTypeOrderBot" (since := "2025-02-13")]
def toTypeOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, by rwa [type_toType]⟩ =
have H := toTypeOrderBot (o := o) (by rintro rfl; simp at ho)
(⊥ : o.toType) :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, _, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (enum _) wo.wf)
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : typein s (f a) = typein r a := by
rw [← f.transPrincipal_apply _ a, (f.transPrincipal _).eq]
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `liftInitialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) : lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't seem to work. -/
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't work. -/
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg)
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) := by
refine Quotient.eq'.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a = lift.{u, v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a < lift.{u, v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_typein_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : lift.{u} (typein s f.top) = lift (type r) :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def liftInitialSeg : Ordinal.{v} ≤i Ordinal.{max u v} := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone lift.{u} (by simp),
fun a b ↦ Ordinal.inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_id'.{max u v} (type s),
← lift_umax.{v, u}, lift_type_lt] at h
obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
use typein r f.top
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_umax, lift_typein_top, lift_id']
@[simp]
theorem liftInitialSeg_coe : (liftInitialSeg.{v, u} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v, u} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
(liftInitialSeg.trans liftInitialSeg).eq liftInitialSeg a
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (card a) = card (lift.{u} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem mem_range_lift_of_le {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v} a) :
b ∈ Set.range lift.{v} :=
liftInitialSeg.mem_range_of_le h
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' ≤ a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.le_apply_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' < a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.lt_apply_iff
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal ω -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega0 : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift (typeLT ℕ)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega0
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega0]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : typeLT ℕ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem card_omega0 : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega0 : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
-/
/-- `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`. -/
instance add : Add Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ => Quotient.liftOn₂ o₁ o₂ (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => type (Sum.Lex r s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => (RelIso.sumLexCongr f g).ordinal_type_eq⟩
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Ordinal.{u} where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
one := 1
zero_add o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(emptySum PEmpty α).symm, Sum.lex_inr_inr⟩⟩
add_zero o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(sumEmpty α PEmpty).symm, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩⟩
add_assoc o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨⟨sumAssoc _ _ _, by
intros a b
rcases a with (⟨a | a⟩ | a) <;> rcases b with (⟨b | b⟩ | b) <;>
simp only [sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl, sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩⟩
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ __ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem type_sum_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Sum.Lex r s) = type r + type s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n := by
induction n <;> [simp; simp only [card_add, card_one, Nat.cast_succ, *]]
@[simp]
theorem card_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card.{u} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_nat n
instance instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ f)) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
instance instAddRightMono : AddRightMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · (Sum.inl ∘ f) Sum.inr) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
theorem le_add_right (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ a + b := by
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_add_left (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + a := by
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem max_zero_left : ∀ a : Ordinal, max 0 a = a :=
max_bot_left
theorem max_zero_right : ∀ a : Ordinal, max a 0 = a :=
max_bot_right
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
max_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Ordinal) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
/-! ### Successor order properties -/
private theorem succ_le_iff' {a b : Ordinal} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
refine inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro ⟨f⟩
· refine ⟨((InitialSeg.leAdd _ _).trans f).toPrincipalSeg fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa using h (f (Sum.inr PUnit.unit))
· apply (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · f fun _ ↦ f.top) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simpa [f.map_rel_iff] using f.lt_top
instance : NoMaxOrder Ordinal :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, succ_le_iff'.1 le_rfl⟩⟩
instance : SuccOrder Ordinal.{u} :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun o => o + 1) succ_le_iff'
instance : SuccAddOrder Ordinal := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ (o : Ordinal) : o + 1 = succ o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 :=
zero_add 1
-- Porting note: Proof used to be rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_one : succ (1 : Ordinal) = 2 := by congr; simp only [Nat.unaryCast, zero_add]
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [Order.one_le_iff_pos, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem succ_pos (o : Ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
bot_lt_succ o
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : Ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt <| succ_pos o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : Ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 := by
simpa using @lt_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _ _
theorem le_one_iff {a : Ordinal} : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by
simpa using @le_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _
@[simp]
theorem card_succ (o : Ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 := by
simp only [← add_one_eq_succ, card_add, card_one]
theorem natCast_succ (n : ℕ) : ↑n.succ = succ (n : Ordinal) :=
rfl
instance uniqueIioOne : Unique (Iio (1 : Ordinal)) where
default := ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩
uniq a := Subtype.ext <| lt_one_iff_zero.1 a.2
@[simp]
theorem Iio_one_default_eq : (default : Iio (1 : Ordinal)) = ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩ :=
rfl
instance uniqueToTypeOne : Unique (toType 1) where
default := enum (α := toType 1) (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩
uniq a := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) a]
congr
rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
apply typein_lt_self
theorem one_toType_eq (x : toType 1) : x = enum (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩ :=
Unique.eq_default x
/-! ### Extra properties of typein and enum -/
-- TODO: use `enumIsoToType` for lemmas on `toType` rather than `enum` and `typein`.
@[simp]
theorem typein_one_toType (x : toType 1) : typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) x = 0 := by
rw [one_toType_eq x, typein_enum]
theorem typein_le_typein' (o : Ordinal) {x y : o.toType} :
typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x ≤ typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem le_enum_succ {o : Ordinal} (a : (succ o).toType) :
a ≤ enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, (type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o)⟩ := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) a, enum_le_enum', Subtype.mk_le_mk,
← lt_succ_iff]
apply typein_lt_self
/-! ### Universal ordinal -/
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `Ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ : Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
lift.{v, u + 1} (typeLT Ordinal)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = typeLT Ordinal :=
lift_id _
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
/-- Principal segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as a principal segment when `u < v`. -/
def liftPrincipalSeg : Ordinal.{u} <i Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨↑liftInitialSeg.{max (u + 1) v, u}, univ.{u, v}, by
refine fun b => inductionOn b ?_; intro β s _
rw [univ, ← lift_umax]; constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [← e]
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _
exact lift_type_lt.{u, u + 1, max (u + 1) v}.2 ⟨typein r⟩
· rw [← lift_id (type s)] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨f⟩ := lift_type_lt.{_,_,v}.1 h
obtain ⟨f, a, hf⟩ := f
exists a
revert hf
-- Porting note: apply inductionOn does not work, refine does
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _ hf
refine lift_type_eq.{u, max (u + 1) v, max (u + 1) v}.2
⟨(RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_) ?_).symm⟩
· exact fun b => enum r ⟨f b, (hf _).1 ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
· refine fun a b h => (typein_lt_typein r).1 ?_
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum]
exact f.map_rel_iff.2 h
· intro a'
obtain ⟨b, e⟩ := (hf _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a')
exists b
simp only [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe]
simp [e]⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_coe :
(liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{max (u + 1) v} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top : (liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v}).top = univ.{u, v} :=
rfl
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top' : liftPrincipalSeg.{u, u + 1}.top = typeLT Ordinal := by
simp only [liftPrincipalSeg_top, univ_id]
end Ordinal
/-! ### Representing a cardinal with an ordinal -/
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem mk_toType (o : Ordinal) : #o.toType = o.card :=
(Ordinal.card_type _).symm.trans <| by rw [Ordinal.type_toType]
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. For the order-embedding version, see `ord.order_embedding`. -/
def ord (c : Cardinal) : Ordinal :=
let F := fun α : Type u => ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2
Quot.liftOn c F
(by
suffices ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β from
fun α β h => (this h).antisymm (this (Setoid.symm h))
rintro α β ⟨f⟩
refine le_ciInf_iff'.2 fun i => ?_
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2
exact
(ciInf_le' _
(Subtype.mk (f ⁻¹'o i.val)
(@RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ _ _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2))).trans_eq
(Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage f i.1⟩))
theorem ord_eq_Inf (α : Type u) : ord #α = ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2 :=
rfl
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) (wo : IsWellOrder α r), ord #α = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨r, wo⟩ := ciInf_mem fun r : { r // IsWellOrder α r } => @type α r.1 r.2
⟨r.1, r.2, wo.symm⟩
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [h : IsWellOrder α r] : ord #α ≤ type r :=
ciInf_le' _ (Subtype.mk r h)
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
inductionOn c fun α =>
Ordinal.inductionOn o fun β s _ => by
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α
simp only [card_type]; constructor <;> intro h
· rw [e] at h
exact
let ⟨f⟩ := h
⟨f.toEmbedding⟩
· obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
have g := RelEmbedding.preimage f s
haveI := RelEmbedding.isWellOrder g
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) g.ordinal_type_le
theorem gc_ord_card : GaloisConnection ord card := fun _ _ => ord_le
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
gc_ord_card.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
c.inductionOn fun α ↦ let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α; e ▸ card_type r
theorem card_surjective : Function.Surjective card :=
fun c ↦ ⟨_, card_ord c⟩
/-- Galois coinsertion between `Cardinal.ord` and `Ordinal.card`. -/
def gciOrdCard : GaloisCoinsertion ord card :=
gc_ord_card.toGaloisCoinsertion fun c => c.card_ord.le
theorem ord_card_le (o : Ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
gc_ord_card.l_u_le _
theorem lt_ord_succ_card (o : Ordinal) : o < (succ o.card).ord :=
lt_ord.2 <| lt_succ _
theorem card_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} : o.card ≤ c ↔ o < (succ c).ord := by
rw [lt_ord, lt_succ_iff]
/--
A variation on `Cardinal.lt_ord` using `≤`: If `o` is no greater than the
initial ordinal of cardinality `c`, then its cardinal is no greater than `c`.
The converse, however, is false (for instance, `o = ω+1` and `c = ℵ₀`).
-/
lemma card_le_of_le_ord {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} (ho : o ≤ c.ord) :
o.card ≤ c := by
rw [← card_ord c]; exact Ordinal.card_le_card ho
@[mono]
theorem ord_strictMono : StrictMono ord :=
gciOrdCard.strictMono_l
@[mono]
theorem ord_mono : Monotone ord :=
gc_ord_card.monotone_l
@[simp]
theorem ord_le_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ ≤ ord c₂ ↔ c₁ ≤ c₂ :=
gciOrdCard.l_le_l_iff
@[simp]
theorem ord_lt_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ < ord c₂ ↔ c₁ < c₂ :=
ord_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem ord_zero : ord 0 = 0 :=
gc_ord_card.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem ord_nat (n : ℕ) : ord n = n :=
(ord_le.2 (card_nat n).ge).antisymm
(by
induction' n with n IH
· apply Ordinal.zero_le
· exact succ_le_of_lt (IH.trans_lt <| ord_lt_ord.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self n)))
@[simp]
theorem ord_one : ord 1 = 1 := by simpa using ord_nat 1
@[simp]
theorem ord_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ord ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ord_nat n
@[simp]
theorem ord_aleph0 : ord.{u} ℵ₀ = ω :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 le_rfl) <|
le_of_forall_lt fun o h => by
rcases Ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨o, h', rfl⟩
rw [lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt_aleph0, ← typein_enum (· < ·) h']
exact lt_aleph0_iff_fintype.2 ⟨Set.fintypeLTNat _⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_ord (c) : Ordinal.lift.{u,v} (ord c) = ord (lift.{u,v} c) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_) ?_
· rcases Ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 ha with ⟨a, _, rfl⟩
rwa [lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt, ← lt_ord, ← Ordinal.lift_lt]
· rw [ord_le, ← lift_card, card_ord]
theorem mk_ord_toType (c : Cardinal) : #c.ord.toType = c := by simp
theorem card_typein_lt (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) (h : ord #α = type r) :
card (typein r x) < #α := by
rw [← lt_ord, h]
apply typein_lt_type
theorem card_typein_toType_lt (c : Cardinal) (x : c.ord.toType) :
card (typein (α := c.ord.toType) (· < ·) x) < c := by
rw [← lt_ord]
apply typein_lt_self
theorem mk_Iio_ord_toType {c : Cardinal} (i : c.ord.toType) : #(Iio i) < c :=
card_typein_toType_lt c i
theorem ord_injective : Injective ord := by
intro c c' h
rw [← card_ord c, ← card_ord c', h]
@[simp]
theorem ord_inj {a b : Cardinal} : a.ord = b.ord ↔ a = b :=
ord_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem ord_eq_zero {a : Cardinal} : a.ord = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
ord_injective.eq_iff' ord_zero
@[simp]
theorem ord_eq_one {a : Cardinal} : a.ord = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
ord_injective.eq_iff' ord_one
@[simp]
theorem omega0_le_ord {a : Cardinal} : ω ≤ a.ord ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a := by
rw [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
@[simp]
theorem ord_le_omega0 {a : Cardinal} : a.ord ≤ ω ↔ a ≤ ℵ₀ := by
rw [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
@[simp]
theorem ord_lt_omega0 {a : Cardinal} : a.ord < ω ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 omega0_le_ord
@[simp]
theorem omega0_lt_ord {a : Cardinal} : ω < a.ord ↔ ℵ₀ < a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 ord_le_omega0
@[simp]
theorem ord_eq_omega0 {a : Cardinal} : a.ord = ω ↔ a = ℵ₀ :=
ord_injective.eq_iff' ord_aleph0
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. This is the order-embedding version. For the regular function, see `ord`.
-/
def ord.orderEmbedding : Cardinal ↪o Ordinal :=
RelEmbedding.orderEmbeddingOfLTEmbedding
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone Cardinal.ord fun _ _ => Cardinal.ord_lt_ord.2)
@[simp]
theorem ord.orderEmbedding_coe : (ord.orderEmbedding : Cardinal → Ordinal) = ord :=
rfl
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- The cardinal `univ` is the cardinality of ordinal `univ`, or
equivalently the cardinal of `Ordinal.{u}`, or `Cardinal.{u}`,
as an element of `Cardinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ :=
lift.{v, u + 1} #Ordinal
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = #Ordinal :=
lift_id _
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
theorem lift_lt_univ (c : Cardinal) : lift.{u + 1, u} c < univ.{u, u + 1} := by
simpa only [liftPrincipalSeg_coe, lift_ord, lift_succ, ord_le, succ_le_iff] using
le_of_lt (liftPrincipalSeg.{u, u + 1}.lt_top (succ c).ord)
theorem lift_lt_univ' (c : Cardinal) : lift.{max (u + 1) v, u} c < univ.{u, v} := by
have := lift_lt.{_, max (u+1) v}.2 (lift_lt_univ c)
rw [lift_lift, lift_univ, univ_umax.{u,v}] at this
exact this
@[simp]
theorem ord_univ : ord univ.{u, v} = Ordinal.univ.{u, v} := by
refine le_antisymm (ord_card_le _) <| le_of_forall_lt fun o h => lt_ord.2 ?_
have := liftPrincipalSeg.mem_range_of_rel_top (by simpa only [liftPrincipalSeg_coe] using h)
rcases this with ⟨o, h'⟩
rw [← h', liftPrincipalSeg_coe, ← lift_card]
apply lift_lt_univ'
theorem lt_univ {c} : c < univ.{u, u + 1} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{u + 1, u} c' :=
⟨fun h => by
have := ord_lt_ord.2 h
rw [ord_univ] at this
obtain ⟨o, e⟩ := liftPrincipalSeg.mem_range_of_rel_top (by simpa only [liftPrincipalSeg_top])
have := card_ord c
rw [← e, liftPrincipalSeg_coe, ← lift_card] at this
exact ⟨_, this.symm⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ _⟩
theorem lt_univ' {c} : c < univ.{u, v} ↔ ∃ c', c = lift.{max (u + 1) v, u} c' :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨a, h', e⟩ := lt_lift_iff.1 h
rw [← univ_id] at h'
rcases lt_univ.{u}.1 h' with ⟨c', rfl⟩
exact ⟨c', by simp only [e.symm, lift_lift]⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ lift_lt_univ' _⟩
theorem small_iff_lift_mk_lt_univ {α : Type u} :
Small.{v} α ↔ Cardinal.lift.{v+1,_} #α < univ.{v, max u (v + 1)} := by
rw [lt_univ']
constructor
· rintro ⟨β, e⟩
exact ⟨#β, lift_mk_eq.{u, _, v + 1}.2 e⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact ⟨⟨c.out, lift_mk_eq.{u, _, v + 1}.1 (hc.trans (congr rfl c.mk_out.symm))⟩⟩
/-- If a cardinal `c` is non zero, then `c.ord.toType` has a least element. -/
noncomputable def toTypeOrderBot {c : Cardinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
OrderBot c.ord.toType :=
Ordinal.toTypeOrderBot (fun h ↦ hc (ord_injective (by simpa using h)))
end Cardinal
namespace Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem card_univ : card univ.{u,v} = Cardinal.univ.{u,v} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : Cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (n : Ordinal) ≤ o := by
rw [← Cardinal.ord_le, Cardinal.ord_nat]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_card {o} : 1 ≤ card o ↔ 1 ≤ o := by
simpa using nat_le_card (n := 1)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_le_card {o} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : Cardinal) ≤ card o ↔ (OfNat.ofNat n : Ordinal) ≤ o :=
nat_le_card
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_card {o} : ℵ₀ ≤ card o ↔ ω ≤ o := by
rw [← ord_le, ord_aleph0]
@[simp]
theorem card_lt_aleph0 {o} : card o < ℵ₀ ↔ o < ω :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.1 aleph0_le_card
@[simp]
theorem nat_lt_card {o} {n : ℕ} : (n : Cardinal) < card o ↔ (n : Ordinal) < o := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, ← succ_le_iff, ← nat_succ, nat_le_card]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_card {o} : 0 < card o ↔ 0 < o := by
simpa using nat_lt_card (n := 0)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_card {o} : 1 < card o ↔ 1 < o := by
| simpa using nat_lt_card (n := 1)
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,299 | 1,300 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 686 | 697 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Differentiation
/-!
# Besicovitch covering theorems
The topological Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, in a nice metric space, there exists a
number `N` such that, from any family of balls with bounded radii, one can extract `N` families,
each made of disjoint balls, covering together all the centers of the initial family.
By "nice metric space", we mean a technical property stated as follows: there exists no satellite
configuration of `N + 1` points (with a given parameter `τ > 1`). Such a configuration is a family
of `N + 1` balls, where the first `N` balls all intersect the last one, but none of them contains
the center of another one and their radii are controlled. This property is for instance
satisfied by finite-dimensional real vector spaces.
In this file, we prove the topological Besicovitch covering theorem,
in `Besicovitch.exist_disjoint_covering_families`.
The measurable Besicovitch theorem ensures that, in the same class of metric spaces, if at every
point one considers a class of balls of arbitrarily small radii, called admissible balls, then
one can cover almost all the space by a family of disjoint admissible balls.
It is deduced from the topological Besicovitch theorem, and proved
in `Besicovitch.exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
This implies that balls of small radius form a Vitali family in such spaces. Therefore, theorems
on differentiation of measures hold as a consequence of general results. We restate them in this
context to make them more easily usable.
## Main definitions and results
* `SatelliteConfig α N τ` is the type of all satellite configurations of `N + 1` points
in the metric space `α`, with parameter `τ`.
* `HasBesicovitchCovering` is a class recording that there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there is no satellite configuration of `N + 1` points with parameter `τ`.
* `exist_disjoint_covering_families` is the topological Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls one can extract finitely many disjoint subfamilies covering the same set.
* `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering` is the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem: from any
family of balls with arbitrarily small radii at every point, one can extract countably many
disjoint balls covering almost all the space. While the value of `N` is relevant for the precise
statement of the topological Besicovitch theorem, it becomes irrelevant for the measurable one.
Therefore, this statement is expressed using the `Prop`-valued
typeclass `HasBesicovitchCovering`.
We also restate the following specialized versions of general theorems on differentiation of
measures:
* `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv` ensures that `ρ (closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends
almost surely to the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ` at `x`.
* `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that almost every point in an arbitrary set `s`
is a Lebesgue density point, i.e., `μ (s ∩ closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends to `1` as
`r` tends to `0`. A stronger version for measurable sets is given in
`Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet`.
## Implementation
#### Sketch of proof of the topological Besicovitch theorem:
We choose balls in a greedy way. First choose a ball with maximal radius (or rather, since there
is no guarantee the maximal radius is realized, a ball with radius within a factor `τ` of the
supremum). Then, remove all balls whose center is covered by the first ball, and choose among the
remaining ones a ball with radius close to maximum. Go on forever until there is no available
center (this is a transfinite induction in general).
Then define inductively a coloring of the balls. A ball will be of color `i` if it intersects
already chosen balls of color `0`, ..., `i - 1`, but none of color `i`. In this way, balls of the
same color form a disjoint family, and the space is covered by the families of the different colors.
The nontrivial part is to show that at most `N` colors are used. If one needs `N + 1` colors,
consider the first time this happens. Then the corresponding ball intersects `N` balls of the
different colors. Moreover, the inductive construction ensures that the radii of all the balls are
controlled: they form a satellite configuration with `N + 1` balls (essentially by definition of
satellite configurations). Since we assume that there are no such configurations, this is a
contradiction.
#### Sketch of proof of the measurable Besicovitch theorem:
From the topological Besicovitch theorem, one can find a disjoint countable family of balls
covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the space. Taking a large enough finite subset of these
balls, one gets the same property for finitely many balls. Their union is closed. Therefore, any
point in the complement has around it an admissible ball not intersecting these finitely many balls.
Applying again the topological Besicovitch theorem, one extracts from these a disjoint countable
subfamily covering a proportion `> 1 / (N + 1)` of the remaining points, and then even a disjoint
finite subfamily. Then one goes on again and again, covering at each step a positive proportion of
the remaining points, while remaining disjoint from the already chosen balls. The union of all these
balls is the desired almost everywhere covering.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open Metric Set Filter Fin MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
/-!
### Satellite configurations
-/
/-- A satellite configuration is a configuration of `N+1` points that shows up in the inductive
construction for the Besicovitch covering theorem. It depends on some parameter `τ ≥ 1`.
This is a family of balls (indexed by `i : Fin N.succ`, with center `c i` and radius `r i`) such
that the last ball intersects all the other balls (condition `inter`),
and given any two balls there is an order between them, ensuring that the first ball does not
contain the center of the other one, and the radius of the second ball can not be larger than
the radius of the first ball (up to a factor `τ`). This order corresponds to the order of choice
in the inductive construction: otherwise, the second ball would have been chosen before.
This is the condition `h`.
Finally, the last ball is chosen after all the other ones, meaning that `h` can be strengthened
by keeping only one side of the alternative in `hlast`.
-/
structure Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig (α : Type*) [MetricSpace α] (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ) where
/-- Centers of the balls -/
c : Fin N.succ → α
/-- Radii of the balls -/
r : Fin N.succ → ℝ
rpos : ∀ i, 0 < r i
h : Pairwise fun i j =>
r i ≤ dist (c i) (c j) ∧ r j ≤ τ * r i ∨ r j ≤ dist (c j) (c i) ∧ r i ≤ τ * r j
hlast : ∀ i < last N, r i ≤ dist (c i) (c (last N)) ∧ r (last N) ≤ τ * r i
inter : ∀ i < last N, dist (c i) (c (last N)) ≤ r i + r (last N)
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r`. -/
@[positivity Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r _ _]
def evalBesicovitchSatelliteConfigR : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r $β $inst $N $τ $self $i) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.rpos $self $i)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.r"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-- A metric space has the Besicovitch covering property if there exist `N` and `τ > 1` such that
there are no satellite configuration of parameter `τ` with `N+1` points. This is the condition that
guarantees that the measurable Besicovitch covering theorem holds. It is satisfied by
finite-dimensional real vector spaces. -/
class HasBesicovitchCovering (α : Type*) [MetricSpace α] : Prop where
no_satelliteConfig : ∃ (N : ℕ) (τ : ℝ), 1 < τ ∧ IsEmpty (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α N τ)
/-- There is always a satellite configuration with a single point. -/
instance Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig.instInhabited {α : Type*} {τ : ℝ}
[Inhabited α] [MetricSpace α] : Inhabited (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α 0 τ) :=
⟨{ c := default
r := fun _ => 1
rpos := fun _ => zero_lt_one
h := fun i j hij => (hij (Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i j)).elim
hlast := fun i hi => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i (last 0)] at hi; exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim
inter := fun i hi => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) i (last 0)] at hi; exact (lt_irrefl _ hi).elim }⟩
namespace Besicovitch
namespace SatelliteConfig
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig α N τ)
theorem inter' (i : Fin N.succ) : dist (a.c i) (a.c (last N)) ≤ a.r i + a.r (last N) := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· exact a.inter i H
· have I : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
have := (a.rpos (last N)).le
simp only [I, add_nonneg this this, dist_self]
theorem hlast' (i : Fin N.succ) (h : 1 ≤ τ) : a.r (last N) ≤ τ * a.r i := by
rcases lt_or_le i (last N) with (H | H)
· exact (a.hlast i H).2
· have : i = last N := top_le_iff.1 H
rw [this]
exact le_mul_of_one_le_left (a.rpos _).le h
end SatelliteConfig
/-! ### Extracting disjoint subfamilies from a ball covering -/
/-- A ball package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii. -/
structure BallPackage (β : Type*) (α : Type*) where
/-- Centers of the balls -/
c : β → α
/-- Radii of the balls -/
r : β → ℝ
rpos : ∀ b, 0 < r b
/-- Bound on the radii of the balls -/
r_bound : ℝ
r_le : ∀ b, r b ≤ r_bound
/-- The ball package made of unit balls. -/
def unitBallPackage (α : Type*) : BallPackage α α where
c := id
r _ := 1
rpos _ := zero_lt_one
r_bound := 1
r_le _ := le_rfl
instance BallPackage.instInhabited (α : Type*) : Inhabited (BallPackage α α) :=
⟨unitBallPackage α⟩
/-- A Besicovitch tau-package is a family of balls in a metric space with positive bounded radii,
together with enough data to proceed with the Besicovitch greedy algorithm. We register this in
a single structure to make sure that all our constructions in this algorithm only depend on
one variable. -/
structure TauPackage (β : Type*) (α : Type*) extends BallPackage β α where
/-- Parameter used by the Besicovitch greedy algorithm -/
τ : ℝ
one_lt_tau : 1 < τ
instance TauPackage.instInhabited (α : Type*) : Inhabited (TauPackage α α) :=
⟨{ unitBallPackage α with
τ := 2
one_lt_tau := one_lt_two }⟩
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {β : Type u}
namespace TauPackage
variable [Nonempty β] (p : TauPackage β α)
/-- Choose inductively large balls with centers that are not contained in the union of already
chosen balls. This is a transfinite induction. -/
noncomputable def index : Ordinal.{u} → β
| i =>
-- `Z` is the set of points that are covered by already constructed balls
let Z := ⋃ j : { j // j < i }, ball (p.c (index j)) (p.r (index j))
-- `R` is the supremum of the radii of balls with centers not in `Z`
let R := iSup fun b : { b : β // p.c b ∉ Z } => p.r b
-- return an index `b` for which the center `c b` is not in `Z`, and the radius is at
-- least `R / τ`, if such an index exists (and garbage otherwise).
Classical.epsilon fun b : β => p.c b ∉ Z ∧ R ≤ p.τ * p.r b
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
/-- The set of points that are covered by the union of balls selected at steps `< i`. -/
def iUnionUpTo (i : Ordinal.{u}) : Set α :=
⋃ j : { j // j < i }, ball (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j))
theorem monotone_iUnionUpTo : Monotone p.iUnionUpTo := by
intro i j hij
simp only [iUnionUpTo]
exact iUnion_mono' fun r => ⟨⟨r, r.2.trans_le hij⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
/-- Supremum of the radii of balls whose centers are not yet covered at step `i`. -/
def R (i : Ordinal.{u}) : ℝ :=
iSup fun b : { b : β // p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i } => p.r b
/-- Group the balls into disjoint families, by assigning to a ball the smallest color for which
it does not intersect any already chosen ball of this color. -/
noncomputable def color : Ordinal.{u} → ℕ
| i =>
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < i })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty), {color j}
sInf (univ \ A)
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
/-- `p.lastStep` is the first ordinal where the construction stops making sense, i.e., `f` returns
garbage since there is no point left to be chosen. We will only use ordinals before this step. -/
def lastStep : Ordinal.{u} :=
sInf {i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}
theorem lastStep_nonempty :
{i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b}.Nonempty := by
by_contra h
suffices H : Function.Injective p.index from not_injective_of_ordinal p.index H
intro x y hxy
wlog x_le_y : x ≤ y generalizing x y
· exact (this hxy.symm (le_of_not_le x_le_y)).symm
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le x_le_y with (rfl | H); · rfl
simp only [nonempty_def, not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_setOf_eq,
not_forall] at h
specialize h y
have A : p.c (p.index y) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo y := by
have :
p.index y =
Classical.epsilon fun b : β => p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo y ∧ p.R y ≤ p.τ * p.r b := by
rw [TauPackage.index]; rfl
rw [this]
exact (Classical.epsilon_spec h).1
simp only [iUnionUpTo, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at A
specialize A x H
simp? [hxy] at A says simp only [hxy, mem_ball, dist_self, not_lt] at A
exact (lt_irrefl _ ((p.rpos (p.index y)).trans_le A)).elim
/-- Every point is covered by chosen balls, before `p.lastStep`. -/
theorem mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep (x : β) : p.c x ∈ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep := by
have A : ∀ z : β, p.c z ∈ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep ∨ p.τ * p.r z < p.R p.lastStep := by
have : p.lastStep ∈ {i | ¬∃ b : β, p.c b ∉ p.iUnionUpTo i ∧ p.R i ≤ p.τ * p.r b} :=
csInf_mem p.lastStep_nonempty
simpa only [not_exists, mem_setOf_eq, not_and_or, not_le, not_not_mem]
by_contra h
rcases A x with (H | H); · exact h H
have Rpos : 0 < p.R p.lastStep := by
apply lt_trans (mul_pos (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau) (p.rpos _)) H
have B : p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.lastStep < p.R p.lastStep := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul (p.R p.lastStep)]
exact mul_lt_mul (inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ p.one_lt_tau) le_rfl Rpos zero_le_one
obtain ⟨y, hy1, hy2⟩ : ∃ y, p.c y ∉ p.iUnionUpTo p.lastStep ∧ p.τ⁻¹ * p.R p.lastStep < p.r y := by
have := exists_lt_of_lt_csSup ?_ B
· simpa only [exists_prop, mem_range, exists_exists_and_eq_and, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [← image_univ, image_nonempty]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, mem_univ _⟩
rcases A y with (Hy | Hy)
· exact hy1 Hy
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul] at hy2
have := (div_le_iff₀' (_root_.zero_lt_one.trans p.one_lt_tau)).1 hy2.le
exact lt_irrefl _ (Hy.trans_le this)
/-- If there are no configurations of satellites with `N+1` points, one never uses more than `N`
distinct families in the Besicovitch inductive construction. -/
theorem color_lt {i : Ordinal.{u}} (hi : i < p.lastStep) {N : ℕ}
(hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N p.τ)) : p.color i < N := by
/- By contradiction, consider the first ordinal `i` for which one would have `p.color i = N`.
Choose for each `k < N` a ball with color `k` that intersects the ball at color `i`
(there is such a ball, otherwise one would have used the color `k` and not `N`).
Then this family of `N+1` balls forms a satellite configuration, which is forbidden by
the assumption `hN`. -/
induction' i using Ordinal.induction with i IH
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < i })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty),
{p.color j}
have color_i : p.color i = sInf (univ \ A) := by rw [color]
rw [color_i]
have N_mem : N ∈ univ \ A := by
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff,
mem_closedBall, not_and, mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
intro j ji _
exact (IH j ji (ji.trans hi)).ne'
suffices sInf (univ \ A) ≠ N by
rcases (csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow (univ \ A)) N_mem).lt_or_eq with (H | H)
· exact H
· exact (this H).elim
intro Inf_eq_N
have :
∀ k, k < N → ∃ j, j < i ∧
(closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index i)) (p.r (p.index i))).Nonempty ∧ k = p.color j := by
intro k hk
rw [← Inf_eq_N] at hk
have : k ∈ A := by
simpa only [true_and, mem_univ, Classical.not_not, mem_diff] using
Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf hk
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right,
and_assoc] at this
simpa only [A, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, mem_closedBall, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk]
choose! g hg using this
-- Choose for each `k < N` an ordinal `G k < i` giving a ball of color `k` intersecting
-- the last ball.
let G : ℕ → Ordinal := fun n => if n = N then i else g n
have color_G : ∀ n, n ≤ N → p.color (G n) = n := by
intro n hn
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· simp only [G]; simp only [color_i, Inf_eq_N, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
· simp only [G]; simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).right.right.symm, if_false]
have G_lt_last : ∀ n, n ≤ N → G n < p.lastStep := by
intro n hn
rcases hn.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· simp only [G]; simp only [hi, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
· simp only [G]; simp only [H.ne, (hg n H).left.trans hi, if_false]
have fGn :
∀ n, n ≤ N →
p.c (p.index (G n)) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G n)) := by
intro n hn
have :
p.index (G n) =
Classical.epsilon fun t => p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t := by
rw [index]; rfl
rw [this]
have : ∃ t, p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G n) ∧ p.R (G n) ≤ p.τ * p.r t := by
simpa only [not_exists, exists_prop, not_and, not_lt, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall] using
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (G_lt_last n hn) (OrderBot.bddBelow _)
exact Classical.epsilon_spec this
-- the balls with indices `G k` satisfy the characteristic property of satellite configurations.
have Gab :
∀ a b : Fin (Nat.succ N),
G a < G b →
p.r (p.index (G a)) ≤ dist (p.c (p.index (G a))) (p.c (p.index (G b))) ∧
p.r (p.index (G b)) ≤ p.τ * p.r (p.index (G a)) := by
intro a b G_lt
have ha : (a : ℕ) ≤ N := Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2
have hb : (b : ℕ) ≤ N := Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2
constructor
· have := (fGn b hb).1
simp only [iUnionUpTo, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_le,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at this
simpa only [dist_comm, mem_ball, not_lt] using this (G a) G_lt
· apply le_trans _ (fGn a ha).2
have B : p.c (p.index (G b)) ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) := by
intro H; exact (fGn b hb).1 (p.monotone_iUnionUpTo G_lt.le H)
let b' : { t // p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) } := ⟨p.index (G b), B⟩
apply @le_ciSup _ _ _ (fun t : { t // p.c t ∉ p.iUnionUpTo (G a) } => p.r t) _ b'
refine ⟨p.r_bound, fun t ht => ?_⟩
simp only [exists_prop, mem_range, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at ht
rcases ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [← hu.2]
exact p.r_le _
-- therefore, one may use them to construct a satellite configuration with `N+1` points
let sc : SatelliteConfig α N p.τ :=
{ c := fun k => p.c (p.index (G k))
r := fun k => p.r (p.index (G k))
rpos := fun k => p.rpos (p.index (G k))
h := by
intro a b a_ne_b
wlog G_le : G a ≤ G b generalizing a b
· exact (this a_ne_b.symm (le_of_not_le G_le)).symm
have G_lt : G a < G b := by
rcases G_le.lt_or_eq with (H | H); · exact H
have A : (a : ℕ) ≠ b := Fin.val_injective.ne a_ne_b
rw [← color_G a (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 a.2), ← color_G b (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 b.2), H] at A
exact (A rfl).elim
exact Or.inl (Gab a b G_lt)
hlast := by
intro a ha
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha
have : G a < G (Fin.last N) := by dsimp; simp [G, I.ne, (hg a I).1]
exact Gab _ _ this
inter := by
intro a ha
have I : (a : ℕ) < N := ha
have J : G (Fin.last N) = i := by dsimp; simp only [G, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]
have K : G a = g a := by dsimp [G]; simp [I.ne, (hg a I).1]
convert dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall (hg _ I).2.1 }
-- this is a contradiction
exact hN.false sc
end TauPackage
open TauPackage
/-- The topological Besicovitch covering theorem: there exist finitely many families of disjoint
balls covering all the centers in a package. More specifically, one can use `N` families if there
are no satellite configurations with `N+1` points. -/
theorem exist_disjoint_covering_families {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (hτ : 1 < τ)
(hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N τ)) (q : BallPackage β α) :
∃ s : Fin N → Set β,
(∀ i : Fin N, (s i).PairwiseDisjoint fun j => closedBall (q.c j) (q.r j)) ∧
range q.c ⊆ ⋃ i : Fin N, ⋃ j ∈ s i, ball (q.c j) (q.r j) := by
-- first exclude the trivial case where `β` is empty (we need non-emptiness for the transfinite
-- induction, to be able to choose garbage when there is no point left).
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· refine ⟨fun _ => ∅, fun _ => pairwiseDisjoint_empty, ?_⟩
rw [← image_univ, eq_empty_of_isEmpty (univ : Set β)]
simp
-- Now, assume `β` is nonempty.
let p : TauPackage β α :=
{ q with
τ
one_lt_tau := hτ }
-- we use for `s i` the balls of color `i`.
let s := fun i : Fin N =>
⋃ (k : Ordinal.{u}) (_ : k < p.lastStep) (_ : p.color k = i), ({p.index k} : Set β)
refine ⟨s, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
· -- show that balls of the same color are disjoint
intro x hx y hy x_ne_y
obtain ⟨jx, jx_lt, jxi, rfl⟩ :
∃ jx : Ordinal, jx < p.lastStep ∧ p.color jx = i ∧ x = p.index jx := by
simpa only [s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff] using hx
obtain ⟨jy, jy_lt, jyi, rfl⟩ :
∃ jy : Ordinal, jy < p.lastStep ∧ p.color jy = i ∧ y = p.index jy := by
simpa only [s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff] using hy
wlog jxy : jx ≤ jy generalizing jx jy
· exact (this jy jy_lt jyi hy jx jx_lt jxi hx x_ne_y.symm (le_of_not_le jxy)).symm
replace jxy : jx < jy := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le jxy with (H | rfl); · { exact H }; · { exact (x_ne_y rfl).elim }
let A : Set ℕ :=
⋃ (j : { j // j < jy })
(_ : (closedBall (p.c (p.index j)) (p.r (p.index j)) ∩
closedBall (p.c (p.index jy)) (p.r (p.index jy))).Nonempty),
{p.color j}
have color_j : p.color jy = sInf (univ \ A) := by rw [TauPackage.color]
have h : p.color jy ∈ univ \ A := by
rw [color_j]
apply csInf_mem
refine ⟨N, ?_⟩
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, not_and,
mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
intro k hk _
exact (p.color_lt (hk.trans jy_lt) hN).ne'
simp only [A, not_exists, true_and, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff, not_and,
mem_univ, mem_diff, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] at h
specialize h jx jxy
contrapose! h
simpa only [jxi, jyi, and_true, eq_self_iff_true, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] using h
· -- show that the balls of color at most `N` cover every center.
refine range_subset_iff.2 fun b => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ :
∃ a : Ordinal, a < p.lastStep ∧ dist (p.c b) (p.c (p.index a)) < p.r (p.index a) := by
simpa only [iUnionUpTo, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_ball, Subtype.exists,
Subtype.coe_mk] using p.mem_iUnionUpTo_lastStep b
simp only [s, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_ball, mem_singleton_iff, biUnion_and',
exists_eq_left, iUnion_exists, exists_and_left]
exact ⟨⟨p.color a, p.color_lt ha.1 hN⟩, a, rfl, ha⟩
/-!
### The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem
-/
open scoped NNReal
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
/-- Consider, for each `x` in a set `s`, a radius `r x ∈ (0, 1]`. Then one can find finitely
many disjoint balls of the form `closedBall x (r x)` covering a proportion `1/(N+1)` of `s`, if
there are no satellite configurations with `N+1` points.
-/
theorem exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {N : ℕ}
{τ : ℝ} (hτ : 1 < τ) (hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N τ)) (s : Set α) (r : α → ℝ)
(rpos : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < r x) (rle : ∀ x ∈ s, r x ≤ 1) :
∃ t : Finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) ≤ N / (N + 1) * μ s ∧
(t : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
classical
-- exclude the trivial case where `μ s = 0`.
rcases le_or_lt (μ s) 0 with (hμs | hμs)
· have : μ s = 0 := le_bot_iff.1 hμs
refine ⟨∅, by simp only [Finset.coe_empty, empty_subset], ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [this, Finset.not_mem_empty, diff_empty, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· simp only [Finset.coe_empty, pairwiseDisjoint_empty]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· simp only [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty] at hμs
exact (lt_irrefl _ hμs).elim
have Npos : N ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
inhabit α
exact not_isEmpty_of_nonempty _ hN
-- introduce a measurable superset `o` with the same measure, for measure computations
obtain ⟨o, so, omeas, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, s ⊆ o ∧ MeasurableSet o ∧ μ o = μ s :=
exists_measurable_superset μ s
/- We will apply the topological Besicovitch theorem, giving `N` disjoint subfamilies of balls
covering `s`. Among these, one of them covers a proportion at least `1/N` of `s`. A large
enough finite subfamily will then cover a proportion at least `1/(N+1)`. -/
let a : BallPackage s α :=
{ c := fun x => x
r := fun x => r x
rpos := fun x => rpos x x.2
r_bound := 1
r_le := fun x => rle x x.2 }
rcases exist_disjoint_covering_families hτ hN a with ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩
have u_count : ∀ i, (u i).Countable := by
intro i
refine (hu i).countable_of_nonempty_interior fun j _ => ?_
have : (ball (j : α) (r j)).Nonempty := nonempty_ball.2 (a.rpos _)
exact this.mono ball_subset_interior_closedBall
let v : Fin N → Set α := fun i => ⋃ (x : s) (_ : x ∈ u i), closedBall x (r x)
have A : s = ⋃ i : Fin N, s ∩ v i := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (iUnion_subset fun i => inter_subset_left)
intro x hx
obtain ⟨i, y, hxy, h'⟩ :
∃ (i : Fin N) (i_1 : ↥s), i_1 ∈ u i ∧ x ∈ ball (↑i_1) (r ↑i_1) := by
have : x ∈ range a.c := by simpa only [a, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
simpa only [mem_iUnion, bex_def] using hu' this
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ⟨hx, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [v, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, SetCoe.exists, exists_and_right, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact ⟨y, ⟨y.2, by simpa only [Subtype.coe_eta]⟩, ball_subset_closedBall h'⟩
have S : ∑ _i : Fin N, μ s / N ≤ ∑ i, μ (s ∩ v i) :=
calc
∑ _i : Fin N, μ s / N = μ s := by
simp only [Finset.card_fin, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel]
· simp only [Npos, Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff]
· exact ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _
_ ≤ ∑ i, μ (s ∩ v i) := by
conv_lhs => rw [A]
apply measure_iUnion_fintype_le
-- choose an index `i` of a subfamily covering at least a proportion `1/N` of `s`.
obtain ⟨i, -, hi⟩ : ∃ (i : Fin N), i ∈ Finset.univ ∧ μ s / N ≤ μ (s ∩ v i) := by
apply ENNReal.exists_le_of_sum_le _ S
exact ⟨⟨0, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 Npos⟩, Finset.mem_univ _⟩
replace hi : μ s / (N + 1) < μ (s ∩ v i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ hi
apply (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left hμs.ne' (measure_lt_top μ s).ne).2
rw [ENNReal.inv_lt_inv]
conv_lhs => rw [← add_zero (N : ℝ≥0∞)]
exact ENNReal.add_lt_add_left (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top N) zero_lt_one
have B : μ (o ∩ v i) = ∑' x : u i, μ (o ∩ closedBall x (r x)) := by
have : o ∩ v i = ⋃ (x : s) (_ : x ∈ u i), o ∩ closedBall x (r x) := by
simp only [v, inter_iUnion]
rw [this, measure_biUnion (u_count i)]
· exact (hu i).mono fun k => inter_subset_right
· exact fun b _ => omeas.inter measurableSet_closedBall
-- A large enough finite subfamily of `u i` will also cover a proportion `> 1/(N+1)` of `s`.
-- Since `s` might not be measurable, we express this in terms of the measurable superset `o`.
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ :
∃ w : Finset (u i), μ s / (N + 1) <
∑ x ∈ w, μ (o ∩ closedBall (x : α) (r (x : α))) := by
have C : HasSum (fun x : u i => μ (o ∩ closedBall x (r x))) (μ (o ∩ v i)) := by
rw [B]; exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
have : μ s / (N + 1) < μ (o ∩ v i) := hi.trans_le (measure_mono (inter_subset_inter_left _ so))
exact ((tendsto_order.1 C).1 _ this).exists
-- Bring back the finset `w i` of `↑(u i)` to a finset of `α`, and check that it works by design.
refine ⟨Finset.image (fun x : u i => x) w, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- show that the finset is included in `s`.
· simp only [image_subset_iff, Finset.coe_image]
intro y _
simp only [Subtype.coe_prop, mem_preimage]
-- show that it covers a large enough proportion of `s`. For measure computations, we do not
-- use `s` (which might not be measurable), but its measurable superset `o`. Since their measures
-- are the same, this does not spoil the estimates
· suffices H : μ (o \ ⋃ x ∈ w, closedBall (↑x) (r ↑x)) ≤ N / (N + 1) * μ s by
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]
exact le_trans (measure_mono (diff_subset_diff so (Subset.refl _))) H
rw [← diff_inter_self_eq_diff,
measure_diff_le_iff_le_add _ inter_subset_right (measure_lt_top μ _).ne]
swap
· exact .inter
(w.nullMeasurableSet_biUnion fun _ _ ↦ measurableSet_closedBall.nullMeasurableSet)
omeas.nullMeasurableSet
calc
μ o = 1 / (N + 1) * μ s + N / (N + 1) * μ s := by
rw [μo, ← add_mul, ENNReal.div_add_div_same, add_comm, ENNReal.div_self, one_mul] <;> simp
_ ≤ μ ((⋃ x ∈ w, closedBall (↑x) (r ↑x)) ∩ o) + N / (N + 1) * μ s := by
gcongr
rw [one_div, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
apply hw.le.trans (le_of_eq _)
rw [← Finset.set_biUnion_coe, inter_comm _ o, inter_iUnion₂, Finset.set_biUnion_coe,
measure_biUnion_finset]
· have : (w : Set (u i)).PairwiseDisjoint
fun b : u i => closedBall (b : α) (r (b : α)) := by
intro k _ l _ hkl; exact hu i k.2 l.2 (Subtype.val_injective.ne hkl)
exact this.mono fun k => inter_subset_right
· intro b _
apply omeas.inter measurableSet_closedBall
-- show that the balls are disjoint
· intro k hk l hl hkl
obtain ⟨k', _, rfl⟩ : ∃ k' : u i, k' ∈ w ∧ ↑k' = k := by
simpa only [mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_image] using hk
obtain ⟨l', _, rfl⟩ : ∃ l' : u i, l' ∈ w ∧ ↑l' = l := by
simpa only [mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_image] using hl
have k'nel' : (k' : s) ≠ l' := by intro h; rw [h] at hkl; exact hkl rfl
exact hu i k'.2 l'.2 k'nel'
variable [HasBesicovitchCovering α]
/-- The **measurable Besicovitch covering theorem**. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`.
This version requires that the underlying measure is finite, and that the space has the Besicovitch
covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces). It expresses the
conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the proof technique.
For a version assuming that the measure is sigma-finite,
see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux`.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_of_finiteMeasure_aux (μ : Measure α)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → Set ℝ) (s : Set α)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Set (α × ℝ), t.Countable ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2 := by
classical
rcases HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig (α := α) with ⟨N, τ, hτ, hN⟩
/- Introduce a property `P` on finsets saying that we have a nice disjoint covering of a
subset of `s` by admissible balls. -/
let P : Finset (α × ℝ) → Prop := fun t =>
((t : Set (α × ℝ)).PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2) ∧
(∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧ ∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1
/- Given a finite good covering of a subset `s`, one can find a larger finite good covering,
covering additionally a proportion at least `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. This follows from
`exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure` applied to balls not intersecting the initial
covering. -/
have :
∀ t : Finset (α × ℝ), P t → ∃ u : Finset (α × ℝ), t ⊆ u ∧ P u ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u), closedBall p.1 p.2) ≤
N / (N + 1) * μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) := by
intro t ht
set B := ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2 with hB
have B_closed : IsClosed B := isClosed_biUnion_finset fun i _ => isClosed_closedBall
set s' := s \ B
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 1, Disjoint B (closedBall x r) := by
intro x hx
have xs : x ∈ s := ((mem_diff x).1 hx).1
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty B with (hB | hB)
· rcases hf x xs 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩
exact ⟨r, ⟨hr, h'r⟩, by simp only [hB, empty_disjoint]⟩
· let r := infDist x B
have : 0 < min r 1 :=
lt_min ((B_closed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos hB).1 ((mem_diff x).1 hx).2) zero_lt_one
rcases hf x xs _ this with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩
refine ⟨r, ⟨hr, ⟨h'r.1, h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rw [disjoint_comm]
exact disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist (h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))
choose! r hr using this
obtain ⟨v, vs', hμv, hv⟩ :
∃ v : Finset α,
↑v ⊆ s' ∧
μ (s' \ ⋃ x ∈ v, closedBall x (r x)) ≤ N / (N + 1) * μ s' ∧
(v : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint fun x : α => closedBall x (r x) :=
haveI rI : ∀ x ∈ s', r x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 := fun x hx => (hr x hx).1.2
exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure μ hτ hN s' r (fun x hx => (rI x hx).1) fun x hx =>
(rI x hx).2.le
refine ⟨t ∪ Finset.image (fun x => (x, r x)) v, Finset.subset_union_left, ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp only [Finset.coe_union, pairwiseDisjoint_union, ht.1, true_and, Finset.coe_image]
constructor
· intro p hp q hq hpq
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hp with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hq with ⟨q', q'v, rfl⟩
refine hv p'v q'v fun hp'q' => ?_
rw [hp'q'] at hpq
exact hpq rfl
· intro p hp q hq hpq
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hq with ⟨q', q'v, rfl⟩
apply disjoint_of_subset_left _ (hr q' (vs' q'v)).2
rw [hB, ← Finset.set_biUnion_coe]
exact subset_biUnion_of_mem (u := fun x : α × ℝ => closedBall x.1 x.2) hp
· intro p hp
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 hp with (h'p | h'p)
· exact ht.2.1 p h'p
· rcases Finset.mem_image.1 h'p with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩
exact ((mem_diff _).1 (vs' (Finset.mem_coe.2 p'v))).1
· intro p hp
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 hp with (h'p | h'p)
· exact ht.2.2 p h'p
· rcases Finset.mem_image.1 h'p with ⟨p', p'v, rfl⟩
exact (hr p' (vs' p'v)).1.1
· convert hμv using 2
rw [Finset.set_biUnion_union, ← diff_diff, Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]
/- Define `F` associating to a finite good covering the above enlarged good covering, covering
a proportion `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. Iterating `F`, one will get larger and larger good
coverings, missing in the end only a measure-zero set. -/
choose! F hF using this
let u n := F^[n] ∅
have u_succ : ∀ n : ℕ, u n.succ = F (u n) := fun n => by
simp only [u, Function.comp_apply, Function.iterate_succ']
have Pu : ∀ n, P (u n) := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [P, u, Prod.forall, id, Function.iterate_zero]
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, IsEmpty.forall_iff, Finset.coe_empty, forall₂_true_iff,
and_self_iff, pairwiseDisjoint_empty]
· rw [u_succ]
exact (hF (u n) IH).2.1
refine ⟨⋃ n, u n, countable_iUnion fun n => (u n).countable_toSet, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro p hp
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hp with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact (Pu n).2.1 p (Finset.mem_coe.1 hn)
· intro p hp
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hp with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact (Pu n).2.2 p (Finset.mem_coe.1 hn)
· have A :
∀ n,
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ ⋃ n : ℕ, (u n : Set (α × ℝ))), closedBall p.fst p.snd) ≤
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n), closedBall p.fst p.snd) := by
intro n
gcongr μ (s \ ?_)
exact biUnion_subset_biUnion_left (subset_iUnion (fun i => (u i : Set (α × ℝ))) n)
have B :
∀ n, μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n), closedBall p.fst p.snd) ≤
(N / (N + 1) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n * μ s := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [u, le_refl, diff_empty, one_mul, iUnion_false, iUnion_empty, pow_zero,
Function.iterate_zero, id, Finset.not_mem_empty]
calc
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n.succ), closedBall p.fst p.snd) ≤
N / (N + 1) * μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u n), closedBall p.fst p.snd) := by
rw [u_succ]; exact (hF (u n) (Pu n)).2.2
_ ≤ (N / (N + 1) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n.succ * μ s := by
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left' IH _
have C : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((N : ℝ≥0∞) / (N + 1)) ^ n * μ s) atTop (𝓝 (0 * μ s)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const _ (Or.inr (measure_lt_top μ s).ne)
apply ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff, one_mul]
· conv_lhs => rw [← add_zero (N : ℝ≥0∞)]
exact ENNReal.add_lt_add_left (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top N) zero_lt_one
· simp only [true_or, add_eq_zero, Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero, and_false]
· simp only [ENNReal.natCast_ne_top, Ne, not_false_iff, or_true]
rw [zero_mul] at C
apply le_bot_iff.1
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' tendsto_const_nhds C fun n => (A n).trans (B n)
· refine (pairwiseDisjoint_iUnion ?_).2 fun n => (Pu n).1
apply (monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => ?_).directed_le
rw [← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, u_succ]
exact (hF (u n) (Pu n)).1
/-- The measurable **Besicovitch covering theorem**.
Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`, one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at
`x`, with arbitrarily small radii. Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by
admissible closed balls centered at some points of `s`.
This version requires the underlying measure to be sigma-finite, and the space to have the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
It expresses the conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the
proof technique.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
(s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Set (α × ℝ), t.Countable ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2 := by
/- This is deduced from the finite measure case, by using a finite measure with respect to which
the initial sigma-finite measure is absolutely continuous. -/
rcases exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ with ⟨ν, hν, hμν, -⟩
rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_of_finiteMeasure_aux ν f s hf with
⟨t, t_count, ts, tr, tν, tdisj⟩
exact ⟨t, t_count, ts, tr, hμν tν, tdisj⟩
/-- The measurable **Besicovitch covering theorem**.
Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`, one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at
`x`, with arbitrarily small radii. Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by
admissible closed balls centered at some points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x`
is bounded by a given function `R x`. (Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires the underlying measure to be sigma-finite, and the space to have the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
(s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
(hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := fun x hx δ δpos ↦ by
rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
obtain ⟨r, t, rfl⟩ : ∃ (r : α → ℝ) (t : Set α), v = graphOn r t := by
have I : ∀ p ∈ v, 0 ≤ p.2 := fun p hp => (vg p hp).2.1.le
rw [exists_eq_graphOn]
refine fun x hx y hy heq ↦ v_disj.eq hx hy <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨x.1, ?_⟩
simp [*]
have hinj : InjOn (fun x ↦ (x, r x)) t := LeftInvOn.injOn (f₁' := Prod.fst) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
simp only [graphOn, forall_mem_image, biUnion_image, hinj.pairwiseDisjoint_image] at *
exact ⟨t, r, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image hinj v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch property, any set `s` can be covered with balls whose measures
add up to at most `μ s + ε`, for any positive `ε`. This works even if one restricts the set of
allowed radii around a point `x` to a set `f x` which accumulates at `0`. -/
theorem exists_closedBall_covering_tsum_measure_le (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ]
[Measure.OuterRegular μ] {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) (f : α → Set ℝ) (s : Set α)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) ∧ (∑' x : t, μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤ μ s + ε := by
/- For the proof, first cover almost all `s` with disjoint balls thanks to the usual Besicovitch
theorem. Taking the balls included in a well-chosen open neighborhood `u` of `s`, one may
ensure that their measures add at most to `μ s + ε / 2`. Let `s'` be the remaining set, of
measure `0`. Applying the other version of Besicovitch, one may cover it with at most `N`
disjoint subfamilies. Making sure that they are all included in a neighborhood `v` of `s'` of
measure at most `ε / (2 N)`, the sum of their measures is at most `ε / 2`,
completing the proof. -/
classical
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ U, U ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U ≤ μ s + ε / 2 :=
Set.exists_isOpen_le_add _ _
(by
simpa only [or_false, Ne, ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff, ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top] using hε)
have : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ R > 0, ball x R ⊆ u := fun x hx =>
Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (u_open.mem_nhds (su hx))
choose! R hR using this
obtain ⟨t0, r0, t0_count, t0s, hr0, μt0, t0_disj⟩ :
∃ (t0 : Set α) (r0 : α → ℝ), t0.Countable ∧ t0 ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x ∈ t0, r0 x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t0, closedBall x (r0 x)) = 0 ∧
t0.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r0 x) :=
exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae μ f s hf R fun x hx => (hR x hx).1
-- we have constructed an almost everywhere covering of `s` by disjoint balls. Let `s'` be the
-- remaining set.
let s' := s \ ⋃ x ∈ t0, closedBall x (r0 x)
have s's : s' ⊆ s := diff_subset
obtain ⟨N, τ, hτ, H⟩ : ∃ N τ, 1 < τ ∧ IsEmpty (Besicovitch.SatelliteConfig α N τ) :=
HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig
obtain ⟨v, s'v, v_open, μv⟩ : ∃ v, v ⊇ s' ∧ IsOpen v ∧ μ v ≤ μ s' + ε / 2 / N :=
Set.exists_isOpen_le_add _ _
(by simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_zero_iff, hε, ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top, or_self,
| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top, not_false_eq_true])
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r1 ∈ f x ∩ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, closedBall x r1 ⊆ v := by
intro x hx
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 (v_open.mem_nhds (s'v hx)) with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
rcases hf x (s's hx) (min r 1) (lt_min rpos zero_lt_one) with ⟨R', hR'⟩
exact
⟨R', ⟨hR'.1, hR'.2.1, hR'.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
Subset.trans (closedBall_subset_ball (hR'.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))) hr⟩
choose! r1 hr1 using this
let q : BallPackage s' α :=
{ c := fun x => x
r := fun x => r1 x
rpos := fun x => (hr1 x.1 x.2).1.2.1
r_bound := 1
r_le := fun x => (hr1 x.1 x.2).1.2.2.le }
-- by Besicovitch, we cover `s'` with at most `N` families of disjoint balls, all included in
-- a suitable neighborhood `v` of `s'`.
obtain ⟨S, S_disj, hS⟩ :
∃ S : Fin N → Set s',
(∀ i : Fin N, (S i).PairwiseDisjoint fun j => closedBall (q.c j) (q.r j)) ∧
range q.c ⊆ ⋃ i : Fin N, ⋃ j ∈ S i, ball (q.c j) (q.r j) :=
exist_disjoint_covering_families hτ H q
have S_count : ∀ i, (S i).Countable := by
intro i
apply (S_disj i).countable_of_nonempty_interior fun j _ => ?_
have : (ball (j : α) (r1 j)).Nonempty := nonempty_ball.2 (q.rpos _)
exact this.mono ball_subset_interior_closedBall
let r x := if x ∈ s' then r1 x else r0 x
have r_t0 : ∀ x ∈ t0, r x = r0 x := by
intro x hx
have : ¬x ∈ s' := by
simp only [s', not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and, not_lt, not_le,
mem_diff, not_forall]
intro _
refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [dist_self]
exact (hr0 x hx).2.1.le
simp only [r, if_neg this]
-- the desired covering set is given by the union of the families constructed in the first and
-- second steps.
refine ⟨t0 ∪ ⋃ i : Fin N, ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, r, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- it remains to check that they have the desired properties
· exact t0_count.union (countable_iUnion fun i => (S_count i).image _)
· simp only [t0s, true_and, union_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i x _
exact s's x.2
· intro x hx
cases hx with
| inl hx =>
rw [r_t0 x hx]
exact (hr0 _ hx).1
| inr hx =>
have h'x : x ∈ s' := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨i, y, _, rfl⟩
exact y.2
simp only [r, if_pos h'x, (hr1 x h'x).1.1]
· intro x hx
by_cases h'x : x ∈ s'
· obtain ⟨i, y, ySi, xy⟩ : ∃ (i : Fin N) (y : ↥s'), y ∈ S i ∧ x ∈ ball (y : α) (r1 y) := by
have A : x ∈ range q.c := by
simpa only [q, not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_closedBall, not_and,
not_le, mem_setOf_eq, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_diff] using h'x
simpa only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, bex_def] using hS A
refine mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, Or.inr ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image]
exact ⟨i, y, ySi, rfl⟩
· have : (y : α) ∈ s' := y.2
simp only [r, if_pos this]
exact ball_subset_closedBall xy
· obtain ⟨y, yt0, hxy⟩ : ∃ y : α, y ∈ t0 ∧ x ∈ closedBall y (r0 y) := by
simpa [s', hx, -mem_closedBall] using h'x
refine mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, Or.inl yt0, ?_⟩
rwa [r_t0 _ yt0]
-- the only nontrivial property is the measure control, which we check now
· -- the sets in the first step have measure at most `μ s + ε / 2`
have A : (∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤ μ s + ε / 2 :=
calc
(∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) = ∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r0 x)) := by
congr 1; ext x; rw [r_t0 x x.2]
_ = μ (⋃ x : t0, closedBall x (r0 x)) := by
haveI : Encodable t0 := t0_count.toEncodable
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact (pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 t0_disj
· exact fun i => measurableSet_closedBall
_ ≤ μ u := by
apply measure_mono
simp only [SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (closedBall_subset_ball (hr0 x hx).2.2) (hR x (t0s hx)).2
_ ≤ μ s + ε / 2 := μu
-- each subfamily in the second step has measure at most `ε / (2 N)`.
have B : ∀ i : Fin N, (∑' x : ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤ ε / 2 / N :=
fun i =>
calc
(∑' x : ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x))) =
∑' x : S i, μ (closedBall x (r x)) := by
have : InjOn ((↑) : s' → α) (S i) := Subtype.val_injective.injOn
let F : S i ≃ ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i := this.bijOn_image.equiv _
exact (F.tsum_eq fun x => μ (closedBall x (r x))).symm
_ = ∑' x : S i, μ (closedBall x (r1 x)) := by
congr 1; ext x; have : (x : α) ∈ s' := x.1.2; simp only [s', r, if_pos this]
_ = μ (⋃ x : S i, closedBall x (r1 x)) := by
haveI : Encodable (S i) := (S_count i).toEncodable
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact (pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_set _ _).2 (S_disj i)
· exact fun i => measurableSet_closedBall
_ ≤ μ v := by
apply measure_mono
simp only [SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x xs' _
exact (hr1 x xs').2
_ ≤ ε / 2 / N := by have : μ s' = 0 := μt0; rwa [this, zero_add] at μv
-- add up all these to prove the desired estimate
calc
(∑' x : ↥(t0 ∪ ⋃ i : Fin N, ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i), μ (closedBall x (r x))) ≤
(∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) +
∑' x : ⋃ i : Fin N, ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x)) :=
ENNReal.tsum_union_le (fun x => μ (closedBall x (r x))) _ _
_ ≤
(∑' x : t0, μ (closedBall x (r x))) +
∑ i : Fin N, ∑' x : ((↑) : s' → α) '' S i, μ (closedBall x (r x)) :=
(add_le_add le_rfl (ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le (fun x => μ (closedBall x (r x))) _))
_ ≤ μ s + ε / 2 + ∑ i : Fin N, ε / 2 / N := by
gcongr
apply B
_ ≤ μ s + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := by
gcongr
simp only [Finset.card_fin, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_div_le]
_ = μ s + ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
/-! ### Consequences on differentiation of measures -/
/-- In a space with the Besicovitch covering property, the set of closed balls with positive radius
forms a Vitali family. This is essentially a restatement of the measurable Besicovitch theorem. -/
protected def vitaliFamily (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : VitaliFamily μ where
setsAt x := (fun r : ℝ => closedBall x r) '' Ioi (0 : ℝ)
measurableSet _ := forall_mem_image.2 fun _ _ ↦ isClosed_closedBall.measurableSet
nonempty_interior _ := forall_mem_image.2 fun _ rpos ↦
(nonempty_ball.2 rpos).mono ball_subset_interior_closedBall
nontrivial x ε εpos := ⟨closedBall x ε, mem_image_of_mem _ εpos, Subset.rfl⟩
covering := by
intro s f fsubset ffine
let g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => {r | 0 < r ∧ closedBall x r ∈ f x}
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
intro x xs δ δpos
obtain ⟨t, tf, ht⟩ : ∃ (t : Set α), t ∈ f x ∧ t ⊆ closedBall x (δ / 2) :=
ffine x xs (δ / 2) (half_pos δpos)
obtain ⟨r, rpos, rfl⟩ : ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ closedBall x r = t := by simpa using fsubset x xs tf
rcases le_total r (δ / 2) with (H | H)
· exact ⟨r, ⟨rpos, tf⟩, ⟨rpos, H.trans_lt (half_lt_self δpos)⟩⟩
· have : closedBall x r = closedBall x (δ / 2) :=
Subset.antisymm ht (closedBall_subset_closedBall H)
rw [this] at tf
exact ⟨δ / 2, ⟨half_pos δpos, tf⟩, ⟨half_pos δpos, half_lt_self δpos⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, r, _, ts, tg, μt, tdisj⟩ :
∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ),
t.Countable ∧
t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ g x ∩ Ioo 0 1) ∧
μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) :=
exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae μ g s A (fun _ => 1) fun _ _ => zero_lt_one
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Besicovitch.lean | 889 | 1,051 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNumbers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `ZMod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `PadicInt` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open Padic Metric IsLocalRing
noncomputable section
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def PadicInt : Type := {x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1}
/-- The ring of `p`-adic integers. -/
notation "ℤ_[" p "]" => PadicInt p
namespace PadicInt
variable {p} {x y : ℤ_[p]}
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
instance : Coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
theorem ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y :=
Subtype.ext
variable (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : Subring ℚ_[p] where
carrier := { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
zero_mem' := by norm_num
one_mem' := by norm_num
add_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _).trans <| max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
mul_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.mul _ _).trans_le <| mul_le_one₀ hx (norm_nonneg _) hy
neg_mem' hx := (norm_neg _).trans_le hx
@[simp]
theorem mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
variable {p}
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ_[p] := inferInstanceAs <| CommRing (subring p)
instance : Inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, Subtype.coe_inj]
lemma coe_ne_zero : (x : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def Coe.ringHom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p]) ^ n := rfl
theorem mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := by simp
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ => if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
instance : CharZero ℤ_[p] where
cast_injective m n h :=
Nat.cast_injective (R := ℚ_[p]) (by rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h; norm_cast at h)
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 := by simp
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def ofIntSeq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => seq n) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(PadicSeq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ) by
rw [PadicSeq.norm]
split_ifs with hne <;> norm_cast
apply padicNorm.of_int⟩
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variable (p)
instance : MetricSpace ℤ_[p] := Subtype.metricSpace
instance : IsUltrametricDist ℤ_[p] := IsUltrametricDist.subtype _
instance completeSpace : CompleteSpace ℤ_[p] :=
have : IsClosed { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 } := isClosed_le continuous_norm continuous_const
this.completeSpace_coe
instance : Norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun z => ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variable {p} in
theorem norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
instance : NormedCommRing ℤ_[p] where
__ := instCommRing
dist_eq := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ rfl
norm_mul_le := by simp [norm_def]
instance : NormOneClass ℤ_[p] :=
⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance : NormMulClass ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun x y ↦ by simp [norm_def]⟩
instance : IsDomain ℤ_[p] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
variable {p}
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ :=
padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
@[simp]
theorem padic_norm_e_of_padicInt (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp [norm_def]
theorem norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℤ_[p])‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := by simp [norm_def]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_padic_norm {q : ℚ_[p]} (hq : ‖q‖ ≤ 1) : @norm ℤ_[p] _ ⟨q, hq⟩ = ‖q‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_p : ‖(p : ℤ_[p])‖ = (p : ℝ)⁻¹ := padicNormE.norm_p
theorem norm_p_pow (n : ℕ) : ‖(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n‖ = (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by simp
private def cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq (f : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm) : CauSeq ℚ_[p] fun a => ‖a‖ :=
⟨fun n => f n, fun _ hε => by simpa [norm, norm_def] using f.cauchy hε⟩
variable (p)
instance complete : CauSeq.IsComplete ℤ_[p] norm :=
⟨fun f =>
have hqn : ‖CauSeq.lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f)‖ ≤ 1 :=
padicNormE_lim_le zero_lt_one fun _ => norm_le_one _
⟨⟨_, hqn⟩, fun ε => by
simpa [norm, norm_def] using CauSeq.equiv_lim (cauSeq_to_rat_cauSeq f) ε⟩⟩
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℝ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹
use k
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀ hε (zpow_pos _ _)]
· rw [zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast]
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hk
norm_cast
apply le_of_lt
convert Nat.lt_pow_self _ using 1
exact hp.1.one_lt
· exact mod_cast hp.1.pos
theorem exists_pow_neg_lt_rat {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ) ^ (-(k : ℤ)) < ε := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := @exists_pow_neg_lt p _ ε (mod_cast hε)
use k
rw [show (p : ℝ) = (p : ℚ) by simp] at hk
exact mod_cast hk
variable {p}
theorem norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd (k : ℤ) : ‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 ↔ ↑p ∣ k by rwa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd k
theorem norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd {k : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
‖(k : ℤ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k :=
suffices ‖(k : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ (p : ℝ) ^ (-n : ℤ) ↔ (p ^ n : ℤ) ∣ k by
simpa [norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm]
padicNormE.norm_int_le_pow_iff_dvd _ _
/-! ### Valuation on `ℤ_[p]` -/
lemma valuation_coe_nonneg : 0 ≤ (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
have := x.2
rwa [Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx, zpow_le_one_iff_right₀, neg_nonpos]
at this
exact mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
/-- `PadicInt.valuation` lifts the `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` to `ℤ_[p]`. -/
def valuation (x : ℤ_[p]) : ℕ := (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation.toNat
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma valuation_coe (x : ℤ_[p]) : (x : ℚ_[p]).valuation = x.valuation := by
simp [valuation, valuation_coe_nonneg]
@[simp] lemma valuation_zero : valuation (0 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_one : valuation (1 : ℤ_[p]) = 0 := by simp [valuation]
@[simp] lemma valuation_p : valuation (p : ℤ_[p]) = 1 := by simp [valuation]
lemma le_valuation_add (hxy : x + y ≠ 0) : min x.valuation y.valuation ≤ (x + y).valuation := by
zify; simpa [← valuation_coe] using Padic.le_valuation_add <| coe_ne_zero.2 hxy
@[simp] lemma valuation_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).valuation = x.valuation + y.valuation := by
zify; simp [← valuation_coe, Padic.valuation_mul (coe_ne_zero.2 hx) (coe_ne_zero.2 hy)]
@[simp]
lemma valuation_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ n).valuation = n * x.valuation := by
zify; simp [← valuation_coe]
|
lemma norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {x : ℤ_[p]} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ‖x‖ = p ^ (-x.valuation : ℤ) := by
simp [norm_def, Padic.norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation <| coe_ne_zero.2 hx]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicIntegers.lean | 291 | 293 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Integral average of a function
In this file we define `MeasureTheory.average μ f` (notation: `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`) to be the average
value of `f` with respect to measure `μ`. It is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ)`, so it
is equal to zero if `f` is not integrable or if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability
measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, we use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ` (notation for `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`). For
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`.
Both have a version for the Lebesgue integral rather than Bochner.
We prove several version of the first moment method: An integrable function is below/above its
average on a set of positive measure:
* `measure_le_setLAverage_pos` for the Lebesgue integral
* `measure_le_setAverage_pos` for the Bochner integral
## Implementation notes
The average is defined as an integral over `(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ` so that all theorems about Bochner
integrals work for the average without modifications. For theorems that require integrability of a
function, we provide a convenience lemma `MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average`.
## Tags
integral, center mass, average value
-/
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
/-!
### Average value of a function w.r.t. a measure
The (Bochner, Lebesgue) average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` (notation:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ`, `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`) is defined as the (Bochner, Lebesgue) integral divided by the total
measure, so it is equal to zero if `μ` is an infinite measure, and (typically) equal to infinity if
`f` is not integrable. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral.
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
section ENNReal
variable (μ) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def laverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) := ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage μ r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if the space has infinite
measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage volume f) => r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If `s`
has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If
`s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral. -/
notation3 (prettyPrint := false)
"⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage Measure.restrict volume s f) => r
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero : ⨍⁻ _x, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [laverage, lintegral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [laverage]
theorem laverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ := rfl
theorem laverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) / μ univ := by
rw [laverage_eq', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, smul_eq_mul]
theorem laverage_eq_lintegral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [laverage, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_mul_laverage [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ univ * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, lintegral_zero_measure, laverage_zero_measure, mul_zero]
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem setLAverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) / μ s := by rw [laverage_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq := setLAverage_eq
theorem setLAverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [laverage_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq' := setLAverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem laverage_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, lintegral_congr_ae h]
theorem setLAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr h, measure_congr h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr := setLAverage_congr
theorem setLAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr_fun hs h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr_fun := setLAverage_congr_fun
theorem laverage_lt_top (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∞ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq]
exact div_lt_top hf (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ)
theorem setLAverage_lt_top : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞ → ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∞ :=
laverage_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_lt_top := setLAverage_lt_top
theorem laverage_add_measure :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
μ univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ν univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂ν := by
by_cases hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ
simp [laverage_eq, hμ]
by_cases hν : IsFiniteMeasure ν; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hν
simp [laverage_eq, hν]
haveI := hμ; haveI := hν
simp only [← ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm, measure_mul_laverage, ← ENNReal.add_div,
← lintegral_add_measure, ← Measure.add_apply, ← laverage_eq]
theorem measure_mul_setLAverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ s * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
have := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_mul_laverage, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias measure_mul_setLaverage := measure_mul_setLAverage
theorem laverage_union (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
μ s / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ + μ t / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, laverage_add_measure, restrict_apply_univ, restrict_apply_univ]
theorem laverage_union_mem_openSegment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), ENNReal.div_pos hs₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩,
ENNReal.div_pos ht₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_union_mem_segment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ≥0∞] ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hs₀ : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hs₀
rw [restrict_congr_set (hs₀.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), zero_le _, zero_le _, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
laverage_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _)
@[simp]
theorem laverage_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [laverage, lintegral_const, measure_univ, mul_one]
theorem setLAverage_const (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ,
univ_inter, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hs₀ hs, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_const := setLAverage_const
theorem laverage_one [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [NeZero μ] : ⨍⁻ _x, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 1 :=
laverage_const _ _
theorem setLAverage_one (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 1 :=
setLAverage_const hs₀ hs _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_one := setLAverage_one
@[simp]
theorem laverage_mul_measure_univ (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(⨍⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) * μ univ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem lintegral_laverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ _x, ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp
theorem setLIntegral_setLAverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ _x in s, ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_laverage _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLintegral_setLaverage := setLIntegral_setLAverage
end ENNReal
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable (μ)
variable {f g : α → E}
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable or
if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def average (f : α → E) :=
∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable or
if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average μ r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume.real univ)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable
or if the space has infinite measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal
to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => average volume f) => r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ.real s)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable on
`s` or if `s` has infinite measure. If `s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume.real s)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x`, so it takes value zero `f` is not integrable on `s`
or if `s` has infinite measure. If `s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => average (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
@[simp]
theorem average_zero : ⨍ _, (0 : E) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [average, integral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem average_zero_measure (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
rw [average, smul_zero, integral_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem average_neg (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, -f x ∂μ = -⨍ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
theorem average_eq' (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ :=
rfl
theorem average_eq (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = (μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq', integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_inv, measureReal_def]
theorem average_eq_integral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_smul_average [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
μ.real univ • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, integral_zero_measure, average_zero_measure, smul_zero]
· rw [average_eq, smul_inv_smul₀]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_pos ?_ <| measure_ne_top _ _).ne'
rwa [Ne, measure_univ_eq_zero]
theorem setAverage_eq (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = (μ.real s)⁻¹ • ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem setAverage_eq' (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [average_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
variable {μ}
theorem average_congr {f g : α → E} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [average_eq, integral_congr_ae h]
theorem setAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setAverage_eq, setIntegral_congr_set h, measureReal_congr h]
theorem setAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in s, g x ∂μ := by simp only [average_eq, setIntegral_congr_ae hs h]
theorem average_add_measure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {f : α → E}
(hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
⨍ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
(μ.real univ / (μ.real univ + ν.real univ)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ +
(ν.real univ / (μ.real univ + ν.real univ)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂ν := by
simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, measure_smul_average, ← smul_add,
← integral_add_measure hμ hν, ← ENNReal.toReal_add (measure_ne_top μ _) (measure_ne_top ν _)]
rw [average_eq, measureReal_add_apply]
theorem average_pair [CompleteSpace E]
{f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (hgi : Integrable g μ) :
⨍ x, (f x, g x) ∂μ = (⨍ x, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x, g x ∂μ) :=
integral_pair hfi.to_average hgi.to_average
theorem measure_smul_setAverage (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ.real s • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_smul_average, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem average_union {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
(μ.real s / (μ.real s + μ.real t)) • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ +
(μ.real t / (μ.real s + μ.real t)) • ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk hsμ.lt_top; haveI := Fact.mk htμ.lt_top
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, average_add_measure hfs hft, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ,
measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem average_union_mem_openSegment {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞)
(hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
replace hs₀ : 0 < μ.real s := ENNReal.toReal_pos hs₀ hsμ
replace ht₀ : 0 < μ.real t := ENNReal.toReal_pos ht₀ htμ
exact mem_openSegment_iff_div.mpr
⟨μ.real s, μ.real t, hs₀, ht₀, (average_union hd ht hsμ htμ hfs hft).symm⟩
theorem average_union_mem_segment {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ] ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hse : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hse
rw [restrict_congr_set (hse.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
mem_segment_iff_div.mpr
⟨μ.real s, μ.real t, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ?_,
(average_union hd ht hsμ htμ hfs hft).symm⟩
calc
0 < μ.real s := ENNReal.toReal_pos hse hsμ
_ ≤ _ := le_add_of_nonneg_right ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
theorem average_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
average_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _) hfi.integrableOn hfi.integrableOn
variable [CompleteSpace E]
@[simp]
theorem average_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : E) :
⨍ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
rw [average, integral_const, measureReal_def, measure_univ, ENNReal.toReal_one, one_smul]
theorem setAverage_const {s : Set α} (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
⨍ _ in s, c ∂μ = c :=
have := NeZero.mk hs₀; have := Fact.mk hs.lt_top; average_const _ _
theorem integral_average (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
∫ _, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by simp
theorem setIntegral_setAverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
∫ _ in s, ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_average _ _
theorem integral_sub_average (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
∫ x, f x - ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_sub hf (integrable_const _), integral_average, sub_self]
refine integral_undef fun h => hf ?_
convert h.add (integrable_const (⨍ a, f a ∂μ))
exact (sub_add_cancel _ _).symm
theorem setAverage_sub_setAverage (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (f : α → E) :
∫ x in s, f x - ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = 0 :=
haveI : Fact (μ s < ∞) := ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hs⟩
integral_sub_average _ _
theorem integral_average_sub [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ - f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [integral_sub (integrable_const _) hf, integral_average, sub_self]
theorem setIntegral_setAverage_sub (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∫ x in s, ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ - f x ∂μ = 0 :=
haveI : Fact (μ s < ∞) := ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hs⟩
integral_average_sub hf
end NormedAddCommGroup
theorem ofReal_average {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hf₀ : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) = (∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) / μ univ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [average_eq, smul_eq_mul, measureReal_def, ← toReal_inv, ofReal_mul toReal_nonneg,
ofReal_toReal (inv_ne_top.2 <| measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ),
ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal hf hf₀, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem ofReal_setAverage {f : α → ℝ} (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hf₀ : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) = (∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) / μ s := by
simpa using ofReal_average hf hf₀
theorem toReal_laverage {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) :
(⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ).toReal = ⨍ x, (f x).toReal ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq, laverage_eq, smul_eq_mul, toReal_div, div_eq_inv_mul, ←
integral_toReal hf (hf'.mono fun _ => lt_top_iff_ne_top.2), measureReal_def]
theorem toReal_setLAverage {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x ≠ ∞) :
(⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ).toReal = ⨍ x in s, (f x).toReal ∂μ := by
simpa [laverage_eq] using toReal_laverage hf hf'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias toReal_setLaverage := toReal_setLAverage
/-! ### First moment method -/
section FirstMomentReal
variable {N : Set α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is smaller than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_le_setAverage_pos (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
0 < μ ({x ∈ s | f x ≤ ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ}) := by
refine pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => ?_
replace H : (μ.restrict s) {x | f x ≤ ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ} = 0 := by
rwa [restrict_apply₀, inter_comm]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_le hf.1 aestronglyMeasurable_const
haveI := Fact.mk hμ₁.lt_top
refine (integral_sub_average (μ.restrict s) f).not_gt ?_
refine (setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae ?_ ?_).2 ?_
· refine measure_mono_null (fun x hx ↦ ?_) H
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, sub_nonneg, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_le] at hx
exact hx.le
· exact hf.sub (integrableOn_const.2 <| Or.inr <| lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hμ₁)
· rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero, inter_comm, ← diff_compl, ← diff_inter_self_eq_diff, measure_diff_null]
refine measure_mono_null ?_ (measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict H)
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ fun a ha => (sub_eq_zero.1 <| of_not_not ha).le
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is greater than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_setAverage_le_pos (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
0 < μ ({x ∈ s | ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ f x}) := by
simpa [integral_neg, neg_div] using measure_le_setAverage_pos hμ hμ₁ hf.neg
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its mean. -/
theorem exists_le_setAverage (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
let ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_le_setAverage_pos hμ hμ₁ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx, h⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its mean. -/
theorem exists_setAverage_le (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∃ x ∈ s, ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ f x :=
let ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_setAverage_le_pos hμ hμ₁ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx, h⟩
section FiniteMeasure
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is smaller than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_le_average_pos (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
0 < μ {x | f x ≤ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ} := by
simpa using measure_le_setAverage_pos (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)
hf.integrableOn
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is greater than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_average_le_pos (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
0 < μ {x | ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
simpa using measure_setAverage_le_pos (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)
hf.integrableOn
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its mean. -/
theorem exists_le_average (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, f x ≤ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_le_average_pos hμ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its mean. -/
theorem exists_average_le (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_average_le_pos hμ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its mean, while
avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_le_average (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ f x ≤ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ := by
have := measure_le_average_pos hμ hf
rw [← measure_diff_null hN] at this
obtain ⟨x, hx, hxN⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero this.ne'
exact ⟨x, hxN, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its mean, while
avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_average_le (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa [integral_neg, neg_div] using exists_not_mem_null_le_average hμ hf.neg hN
end FiniteMeasure
section ProbabilityMeasure
variable [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is smaller than its integral on a set of
positive measure. -/
theorem measure_le_integral_pos (hf : Integrable f μ) : 0 < μ {x | f x ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ} := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
measure_le_average_pos (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is greater than its integral on a set of
positive measure. -/
theorem measure_integral_le_pos (hf : Integrable f μ) : 0 < μ {x | ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
measure_average_le_pos (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its integral. -/
theorem exists_le_integral (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, f x ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using exists_le_average (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its integral. -/
theorem exists_integral_le (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using exists_average_le (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its integral,
while avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_le_integral (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ f x ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
exists_not_mem_null_le_average (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf hN
|
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its integral,
while avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_integral_le (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 593 | 598 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.RightHomology
/-!
# Homology of short complexes
In this file, we shall define the homology of short complexes `S`, i.e. diagrams
`f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`. We shall say that
`[S.HasHomology]` when there exists `h : S.HomologyData`. A homology data
for `S` consists of compatible left/right homology data `left` and `right`. The
left homology data `left` involves an object `left.H` that is a cokernel of the canonical
map `S.X₁ ⟶ K` where `K` is a kernel of `g`. On the other hand, the dual notion `right.H`
is a kernel of the canonical morphism `Q ⟶ S.X₃` when `Q` is a cokernel of `f`.
The compatibility that is required involves an isomorphism `left.H ≅ right.H` which
makes a certain pentagon commute. When such a homology data exists, `S.homology`
shall be defined as `h.left.H` for a chosen `h : S.HomologyData`.
This definition requires very little assumption on the category (only the existence
of zero morphisms). We shall prove that in abelian categories, all short complexes
have homology data.
Note: This definition arose by the end of the Liquid Tensor Experiment which
contained a structure `has_homology` which is quite similar to `S.HomologyData`.
After the category `ShortComplex C` was introduced by J. Riou, A. Topaz suggested
such a structure could be used as a basis for the *definition* of homology.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ S₄ : ShortComplex C}
namespace ShortComplex
/-- A homology data for a short complex consists of two compatible left and
right homology data -/
structure HomologyData where
/-- a left homology data -/
left : S.LeftHomologyData
/-- a right homology data -/
right : S.RightHomologyData
/-- the compatibility isomorphism relating the two dual notions of
`LeftHomologyData` and `RightHomologyData` -/
iso : left.H ≅ right.H
/-- the pentagon relation expressing the compatibility of the left
and right homology data -/
comm : left.π ≫ iso.hom ≫ right.ι = left.i ≫ right.p := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] HomologyData.comm
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData)
/-- A homology map data for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` where both `S₁` and `S₂` are
equipped with homology data consists of left and right homology map data. -/
structure HomologyMapData where
/-- a left homology map data -/
left : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁.left h₂.left
/-- a right homology map data -/
right : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁.right h₂.right
namespace HomologyMapData
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma comm (h : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
h.left.φH ≫ h₂.iso.hom = h₁.iso.hom ≫ h.right.φH := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h₁.left.π, ← cancel_mono h₂.right.ι, assoc,
LeftHomologyMapData.commπ_assoc, HomologyData.comm, LeftHomologyMapData.commi_assoc,
RightHomologyMapData.commι, HomologyData.comm_assoc, RightHomologyMapData.commp]
instance : Subsingleton (HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
rintro ⟨left₁, right₁⟩ ⟨left₂, right₂⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, and_self]⟩
instance : Inhabited (HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
instance : Unique (HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable (φ h₁ h₂)
/-- A choice of the (unique) homology map data associated with a morphism
`φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` where both short complexes `S₁` and `S₂` are equipped with
homology data. -/
def homologyMapData : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_left_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) :
γ₁.left.φH = γ₂.left.φH := by rw [eq]
end HomologyMapData
namespace HomologyData
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc
right := RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel (hf : S.f = 0) [HasKernel S.g] :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernel S hf
right := RightHomologyData.ofHasKernel S hf
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.f` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc
right := RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel (hg : S.g = 0) [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofHasCokernel S hg
right := RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernel S hg
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂` gives a homology data on S -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.HomologyData where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg
right := RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg
iso := Iso.refl _
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a homology data for `S₁` induces a homology data for `S₂`.
The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HomologyData S₂ where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.left
right := RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.right
iso := h.iso
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a homology data for `S₂` induces a homology data for `S₁`.
The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₂)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HomologyData S₁ where
left := LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.left
right := RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.right
iso := h.iso
/-- If `e : S₁ ≅ S₂` is an isomorphism of short complexes and `h₁ : HomologyData S₁`,
this is the homology data for `S₂` deduced from the isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₁) :=
h.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono e.hom
variable {S}
/-- A homology data for a short complex `S` induces a homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.HomologyData) : S.op.HomologyData where
left := h.right.op
right := h.left.op
iso := h.iso.op
comm := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
/-- A homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.HomologyData) : S.unop.HomologyData where
left := h.right.unop
right := h.left.unop
iso := h.iso.unop
comm := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
end HomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has homology when there exists a `S.HomologyData` -/
class HasHomology : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists a homology data -/
condition : Nonempty S.HomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.HomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has homology -/
noncomputable def homologyData [HasHomology S] :
S.HomologyData := HasHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
lemma HasHomology.mk' (h : S.HomologyData) : HasHomology S :=
⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance [HasHomology S] : HasHomology S.op :=
HasHomology.mk' S.homologyData.op
instance (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) [HasHomology S] : HasHomology S.unop :=
HasHomology.mk' S.homologyData.unop
instance hasLeftHomology_of_hasHomology [S.HasHomology] : S.HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' S.homologyData.left
instance hasRightHomology_of_hasHomology [S.HasHomology] : S.HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' S.homologyData.right
instance hasHomology_of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance hasHomology_of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance hasHomology_of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
lemma hasHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasHomology S₁]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HasHomology S₂ :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ S₁.homologyData)
lemma hasHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasHomology S₂]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HasHomology S₁ :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ S₂.homologyData)
lemma hasHomology_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [HasHomology S₁] : HasHomology S₂ :=
HasHomology.mk' (HomologyData.ofIso e S₁.homologyData)
namespace HomologyMapData
/-- The homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.HomologyData) : HomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.id h.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.id h.right
/-- The homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) :
HomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁.left h₂.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁.right h₂.right
/-- The composition of homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.HomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : HomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
HomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
left := ψ.left.comp ψ'.left
right := ψ.right.comp ψ'.right
/-- A homology map data for a morphism of short complexes induces
a homology map data in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def op {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
HomologyMapData (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op where
left := ψ.right.op
right := ψ.left.op
/-- A homology map data for a morphism of short complexes in the opposite category
induces a homology map data in the original category. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :
HomologyMapData (unopMap φ) h₂.unop h₁.unop where
left := ψ.right.unop
right := ψ.left.unop
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁) (HomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofZeros φ hf₁ hg₁ hf₂ hg₂
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofZeros φ hf₁ hg₁ hf₂ hg₂
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork φ hg₁ c₁ hc₁ hg₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork φ hg₁ c₁ hc₁ hg₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofIsLimitKernelFork φ hf₁ c₁ hc₁ hf₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofIsLimitKernelFork φ hf₁ c₁ hc₁ hf₂ c₂ hc₂ f comm
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
HomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork S hf hg c hc
right := RightHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork S hf hg c hc
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the homology data
`HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
HomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork S hf hg c hc
right := RightHomologyMapData.compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork S hf hg c hc
/-- This homology map data expresses compatibilities of the homology data
constructed by `HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono` -/
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
HomologyMapData φ h (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h) where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h.right
/-- This homology map data expresses compatibilities of the homology data
constructed by `HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'` -/
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : HomologyData S₂)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
HomologyMapData φ (HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h) h where
left := LeftHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.left
right := RightHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h.right
end HomologyMapData
variable (S)
/-- The homology of a short complex is the `left.H` field of a chosen homology data. -/
noncomputable def homology [HasHomology S] : C := S.homologyData.left.H
/-- When a short complex has homology, this is the canonical isomorphism
`S.leftHomology ≅ S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyIso [S.HasHomology] : S.leftHomology ≅ S.homology :=
leftHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- When a short complex has homology, this is the canonical isomorphism
`S.rightHomology ≅ S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyIso [S.HasHomology] : S.rightHomology ≅ S.homology :=
rightHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _ ≪≫ S.homologyData.iso.symm
variable {S}
/-- When a short complex has homology, its homology can be computed using
any left homology data. -/
noncomputable def LeftHomologyData.homologyIso (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [S.HasHomology] :
S.homology ≅ h.H := S.leftHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ h.leftHomologyIso
/-- When a short complex has homology, its homology can be computed using
any right homology data. -/
noncomputable def RightHomologyData.homologyIso (h : S.RightHomologyData) [S.HasHomology] :
S.homology ≅ h.H := S.rightHomologyIso.symm ≪≫ h.rightHomologyIso
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma LeftHomologyData.homologyIso_leftHomologyData [S.HasHomology] :
S.leftHomologyData.homologyIso = S.leftHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [homologyIso, leftHomologyIso, ShortComplex.leftHomologyIso]
rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma RightHomologyData.homologyIso_rightHomologyData [S.HasHomology] :
S.rightHomologyData.homologyIso = S.rightHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
simp [homologyIso, rightHomologyIso]
variable {S}
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced homology map `h₁.left.H ⟶ h₁.left.H`. -/
def homologyMap' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData) :
h₁.left.H ⟶ h₂.left.H := leftHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The homology map `S₁.homology ⟶ S₂.homology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def homologyMap (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasHomology S₁] [HasHomology S₂] :
S₁.homology ⟶ S₂.homology :=
homologyMap' φ _ _
namespace HomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(γ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma homologyMap'_eq : homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.left.φH :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma cyclesMap'_eq : cyclesMap' φ h₁.left h₂.left = γ.left.φK :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φK (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma opcyclesMap'_eq : opcyclesMap' φ h₁.right h₂.right = γ.right.φQ :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φQ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end HomologyMapData
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
lemma homologyMap_eq :
homologyMap φ = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.homologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [homologyMap, LeftHomologyData.homologyIso, leftHomologyIso,
LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso, homologyMap']
simp only [← γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, ← leftHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
lemma homologyMap_comm :
homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
simp only [γ.homologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end LeftHomologyMapData
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) [S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology]
lemma homologyMap_eq :
homologyMap φ = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.homologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [homologyMap, homologyMap', RightHomologyData.homologyIso,
| rightHomologyIso, RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso]
have γ' : HomologyMapData φ S₁.homologyData S₂.homologyData := default
simp only [← γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, assoc, ← rightHomologyMap'_comp_assoc,
id_comp, comp_id, γ'.left.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ'.right.rightHomologyMap'_eq, ← γ'.comm_assoc,
Iso.hom_inv_id]
lemma homologyMap_comm :
homologyMap φ ≫ h₂.homologyIso.hom = h₁.homologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Homology.lean | 462 | 469 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is locally closed (e.g. open or closed), then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is
integrable on every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf k hk ↦ hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs with ⟨U, Z, hU, hZ, rfl⟩
rcases exists_compact_subset hU hx.1 with ⟨K, hK, hxK, hKU⟩
rw [nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hU.mem_nhds hx.1)]
refine ⟨Z ∩ K, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hxK), ?_⟩
exact hf (Z ∩ K) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨hKU hy.2, hy.1⟩) (.inter_left hK hZ)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
/-- If `s` is closed, being locally integrable on `s` wrt `μ` is equivalent to being locally
integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`. For the one-way implication without assuming `s` closed,
see `locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hs : IsClosed s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x => ?_, locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict⟩
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, ht_nhds, ht_int⟩ := hf x h
obtain ⟨u, hu_o, hu_x, hu_sub⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht_nhds
refine ⟨u, hu_o.mem_nhds hu_x, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet]
exact ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
· rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at hs
refine ⟨sᶜ, hs.mem_nhds h, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict, inter_comm, inter_compl_self, ← IntegrableOn]
exacts [integrableOn_empty, hs.measurableSet]
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on any compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact {k : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hk : IsCompact k) : IntegrableOn f k μ :=
(hf.locallyIntegrableOn k).integrableOn_isCompact hk
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on an open neighborhood of any
compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {k : Set X}
(hk : IsCompact k) : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ k ⊆ u ∧ IntegrableOn f u μ := by
refine IsCompact.induction_on hk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine ⟨∅, isOpen_empty, Subset.rfl, integrableOn_empty⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨u, u_open, tu, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, hst.trans tu, hu⟩
· rintro s t ⟨u, u_open, su, hu⟩ ⟨v, v_open, tv, hv⟩
exact ⟨u ∪ v, u_open.union v_open, union_subset_union su tv, hu.union hv⟩
· intro x _
rcases hf x with ⟨u, ux, hu⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ux with ⟨v, vu, v_open, xv⟩
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv), v, v_open, Subset.rfl, hu.mono_set vu⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] :
LocallyIntegrable f μ ↔ ∀ k : Set X, IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ :=
⟨fun hf _k hk => hf.integrableOn_isCompact hk, fun hf x =>
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨K, h2K, hf K hK⟩⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
simpa only [restrict_univ] using (locallyIntegrableOn_univ.mpr hf).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If a function is locally integrable in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets covering the space on which it is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ ((⋃ n, u n) = univ) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n) μ) := by
rcases (hf.locallyIntegrableOn univ).exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_union, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, eq_univ_of_univ_subset u_union, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [inter_univ] using hu n
theorem MemLp.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : X → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
have : Fact (μ U < ⊤) := ⟨h'U⟩
refine ⟨U, hU, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
apply (hf.restrict U).mono_exponent hp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.locallyIntegrable := MemLp.locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ :=
(memLp_top_const c).locallyIntegrable le_top
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ => c) s μ :=
(locallyIntegrable_const c).locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem locallyIntegrable_zero : LocallyIntegrable (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) μ :=
(integrable_zero X E μ).locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_zero : LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) s μ :=
locallyIntegrable_zero.locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem LocallyIntegrable.indicator (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : LocallyIntegrable (s.indicator f) μ := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
exact ⟨U, hU, h'U.indicator hs⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_map_homeomorph [BorelSpace X] [BorelSpace Y] (e : X ≃ₜ Y) {f : Y → E}
{μ : Measure X} : LocallyIntegrable f (Measure.map e μ) ↔ LocallyIntegrable (f ∘ e) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x => ?_⟩
· rcases h (e x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e ⁻¹' U, e.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
exact (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).1 h'U
· rcases h (e.symm x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e.symm ⁻¹' U, e.symm.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
apply (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).2
simp only [Homeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv_coe]
convert h'U
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Homeomorph.symm_apply_apply]
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.add (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f + g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).add (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.sub (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (f - g) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).sub (hg x)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
LocallyIntegrable (-f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).neg
protected theorem LocallyIntegrable.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
LocallyIntegrable (c • f) μ := fun x ↦ (hf x).smul c
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Finset.sum_induction f (fun g => LocallyIntegrable g μ) (fun _ _ => LocallyIntegrable.add)
locallyIntegrable_zero hf
theorem locallyIntegrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → X → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, LocallyIntegrable (f i) μ) : LocallyIntegrable (fun a ↦ ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by
simpa only [← Finset.sum_apply] using locallyIntegrable_finset_sum' s hf
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `g • f` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_left_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → ℝ} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ g x • f x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ g x • f x) = (fun x ↦ g x • f x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_right
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
/-- If `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous with compact support,
then `f • g` is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrable_smul_right_of_hasCompactSupport
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [OpensMeasurableSpace X] [T2Space X] {f : X → ℝ} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
{g : X → E} (hg : Continuous g) (h'g : HasCompactSupport g) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ f x • g x) μ := by
let K := tsupport g
have hK : IsCompact K := h'g
have : K.indicator (fun x ↦ f x • g x) = (fun x ↦ f x • g x) := by
apply indicator_eq_self.2
apply support_subset_iff'.2
intros x hx
simp [image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx]
rw [← this, indicator_smul_left]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_left
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK.measurableSet]
exact hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK
· exact hg.memLp_top_of_hasCompactSupport h'g μ
open Filter
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact :
Integrable f μ ↔ (IntegrableAtFilter f (cocompact X) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ) := by
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsc, hs⟩, hloc⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, htc, ht⟩ := mem_cocompact'.mp hsc
rewrite [← integrableOn_univ, ← compl_union_self s, integrableOn_union]
exact ⟨(hloc.integrableOn_isCompact htc).mono ht le_rfl, hs⟩
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔
(IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ) ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.integrableAtFilter _⟩, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact (IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff.mpr h.1).filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot_atTop
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [OrderTop X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
constructor
· exact fun hf ↦ ⟨hf.integrableAtFilter _, hf.locallyIntegrable⟩
· refine fun h ↦ integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_cocompact.mpr ⟨?_, h.2⟩
exact h.1.filter_mono cocompact_le_atBot
theorem integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [OrderBot X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
Integrable f μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
integrable_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
variable {a : X}
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩, fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
haveI : Nonempty X := Nonempty.intro a
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hs.mono ha' le_rfl, ?_⟩).mono Iic_subset_Iic_union_Icc le_rfl
exact h.integrableOn_compact_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self isCompact_Icc
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot (X := Xᵒᵈ)
theorem integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMinOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[<] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Iio a) μ := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨Iio a, Iio_mem_atBot a, h⟩, ⟨Iio a, self_mem_nhdsWithin, h⟩, h.locallyIntegrableOn⟩
· intro ⟨hbot, ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, hlocal⟩
obtain ⟨s', ⟨hs'_mono, hs'⟩⟩ := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.mp hsl
refine (integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨?_, hs.mono hs' le_rfl⟩).mono Iio_subset_Iic_union_Ioo le_rfl
exact integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot.mpr
⟨hbot, hlocal.mono_set (Iic_subset_Iio.mpr hs'_mono)⟩
theorem integrableOn_Ioi_iff_integrableAtFilter_atTop_nhdsWithin
[LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [NoMaxOrder X] [OrderTopology X] :
IntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ∧
IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[>] a) μ ∧ LocallyIntegrableOn f (Ioi a) μ :=
integrableOn_Iio_iff_integrableAtFilter_atBot_nhdsWithin (X := Xᵒᵈ)
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
section borel
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
variable {K : Set X} {a b : X}
/-- A continuous function `f` is locally integrable with respect to any locally finite measure. -/
theorem Continuous.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X E]
(hf : Continuous f) : LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
hf.integrableAt_nhds
/-- A function `f` continuous on a set `K` is locally integrable on this set with respect
to any locally finite measure. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X E] (hf : ContinuousOn f K)
(hK : MeasurableSet K) : LocallyIntegrableOn f K μ := fun _x hx =>
hf.integrableAt_nhdsWithin hK hx
variable [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ]
/-- A function `f` continuous on a compact set `K` is integrable on this set with respect to any
locally finite measure. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact'
(hK : IsCompact K) (h'K : MeasurableSet K) (hf : ContinuousOn f K) :
IntegrableOn f K μ := by
refine ⟨ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact hf hK h'K, ?_⟩
have : Fact (μ K < ∞) := ⟨hK.measure_lt_top⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ f '' K, ‖x‖ ≤ C :=
IsBounded.exists_norm_le (hK.image_of_continuousOn hf).isBounded
apply hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded (C := C)
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem h'K] with x hx using hC _ (mem_image_of_mem f hx)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact [T2Space X]
(hK : IsCompact K) (hf : ContinuousOn f K) : IntegrableOn f K μ :=
hf.integrableOn_compact' hK hK.measurableSet
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_Icc [Preorder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ :=
hf.integrableOn_compact isCompact_Icc
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_Icc [Preorder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ :=
hf.continuousOn.integrableOn_Icc
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_Ioc [Preorder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Icc.mono_set Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableOn_uIcc [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]]) : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Icc
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_uIcc [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f [[a, b]] μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Icc
open scoped Interval in
theorem Continuous.integrableOn_uIoc [LinearOrder X] [CompactIccSpace X] [T2Space X]
(hf : Continuous f) : IntegrableOn f (Ι a b) μ :=
hf.integrableOn_Ioc
/-- A continuous function with compact support is integrable on the whole space. -/
theorem Continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport (hf : Continuous f) (hcf : HasCompactSupport f) :
Integrable f μ :=
(integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset (subset_tsupport f)).mp <|
hf.continuousOn.integrableOn_compact' hcf (isClosed_tsupport _).measurableSet
end borel
open scoped ENNReal
section Monotone
variable [BorelSpace X] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder X] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder E]
[OrderTopology X] [OrderTopology E] [SecondCountableTopology E] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
theorem MonotoneOn.memLp_top (hmono : MonotoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f ∞ (μ.restrict s) := by
borelize E
have hbelow : BddBelow (f '' s) := ⟨f a, fun x ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ => hyx ▸ hmono ha.1 hy (ha.2 hy)⟩
have habove : BddAbove (f '' s) := ⟨f b, fun x ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ => hyx ▸ hmono hy hb.1 (hb.2 hy)⟩
have : IsBounded (f '' s) := Metric.isBounded_of_bddAbove_of_bddBelow habove hbelow
rcases isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le.mp this with ⟨C, hC⟩
have A : MemLp (fun _ => C) ⊤ (μ.restrict s) := memLp_top_const _
apply MemLp.mono A (aemeasurable_restrict_of_monotoneOn h's hmono).aestronglyMeasurable
apply (ae_restrict_iff' h's).mpr
apply ae_of_all _ fun y hy ↦ ?_
exact (hC _ (mem_image_of_mem f hy)).trans (le_abs_self _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias MonotoneOn.memℒp_top := MonotoneOn.memLp_top
theorem MonotoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (hmono : MonotoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
(hmono.memLp_top ha hb h's).mono_exponent_of_measure_support_ne_top (s := univ)
(by simp) (by simpa using hs) le_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias MonotoneOn.memℒp_of_measure_ne_top := MonotoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top
theorem MonotoneOn.memLp_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hmono : MonotoneOn f s) : MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) := by
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
· exact hmono.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (hs.isLeast_sInf h) (hs.isGreatest_sSup h)
hs.measure_lt_top.ne hs.measurableSet
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias MonotoneOn.memℒp_isCompact := MonotoneOn.memLp_isCompact
theorem AntitoneOn.memLp_top (hanti : AntitoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f ∞ (μ.restrict s) :=
MonotoneOn.memLp_top (E := Eᵒᵈ) hanti ha hb h's
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias AntitoneOn.memℒp_top := AntitoneOn.memLp_top
theorem AntitoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (hanti : AntitoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
MonotoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top (E := Eᵒᵈ) hanti ha hb hs h's
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias AntitoneOn.memℒp_of_measure_ne_top := AntitoneOn.memLp_of_measure_ne_top
theorem AntitoneOn.memLp_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hanti : AntitoneOn f s) : MemLp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
MonotoneOn.memLp_isCompact (E := Eᵒᵈ) hs hanti
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias AntitoneOn.memℒp_isCompact := AntitoneOn.memLp_isCompact
theorem MonotoneOn.integrableOn_of_measure_ne_top (hmono : MonotoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hmono.memLp_of_measure_ne_top ha hb hs h's)
theorem MonotoneOn.integrableOn_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hmono : MonotoneOn f s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hmono.memLp_isCompact hs)
theorem AntitoneOn.integrableOn_of_measure_ne_top (hanti : AntitoneOn f s) {a b : X}
(ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsGreatest s b) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hanti.memLp_of_measure_ne_top ha hb hs h's)
theorem AntitoneOn.integrableOn_isCompact [IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ] (hs : IsCompact s)
(hanti : AntitoneOn f s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
memLp_one_iff_integrable.1 (hanti.memLp_isCompact hs)
theorem Monotone.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (hmono : Monotone f) :
LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, xab, hab, abU⟩ : ∃ a b : X, x ∈ Icc a b ∧ Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ Icc a b ⊆ U :=
exists_Icc_mem_subset_of_mem_nhds hU
have ab : a ≤ b := xab.1.trans xab.2
refine ⟨Icc a b, hab, ?_⟩
exact
(hmono.monotoneOn _).integrableOn_of_measure_ne_top (isLeast_Icc ab) (isGreatest_Icc ab)
((measure_mono abU).trans_lt h'U).ne measurableSet_Icc
theorem Antitone.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (hanti : Antitone f) :
LocallyIntegrable f μ :=
hanti.dual_right.locallyIntegrable
end Monotone
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace X] {A K : Set X}
section Mul
variable [NormedRing R] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X R] {g g' : X → R}
theorem IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn_of_subset (hg : IntegrableOn g A μ) (hg' : ContinuousOn g' K)
(hA : MeasurableSet A) (hK : IsCompact K) (hAK : A ⊆ K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) A μ := by
rcases IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn hK hg' with ⟨C, hC⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hg ⊢
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict A, ‖g x * g' x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem hA] with x hx
refine (norm_mul_le _ _).trans ?_
rw [mul_comm]
gcongr
exact hC x (hAK hx)
exact
MemLp.of_le_mul hg (hg.aestronglyMeasurable.mul <| (hg'.mono hAK).aestronglyMeasurable hA) this
theorem IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn [T2Space X] (hg : IntegrableOn g K μ)
(hg' : ContinuousOn g' K) (hK : IsCompact K) : IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) K μ :=
hg.mul_continuousOn_of_subset hg' hK.measurableSet hK (Subset.refl _)
theorem IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul_of_subset (hg : ContinuousOn g K) (hg' : IntegrableOn g' A μ)
(hK : IsCompact K) (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hAK : A ⊆ K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) A μ := by
rcases IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn hK hg with ⟨C, hC⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hg' ⊢
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict A, ‖g x * g' x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖ := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem hA] with x hx
refine (norm_mul_le _ _).trans ?_
gcongr
exact hC x (hAK hx)
exact
MemLp.of_le_mul hg' (((hg.mono hAK).aestronglyMeasurable hA).mul hg'.aestronglyMeasurable) this
theorem IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul [T2Space X] (hg : ContinuousOn g K)
(hg' : IntegrableOn g' K μ) (hK : IsCompact K) : IntegrableOn (fun x => g x * g' x) K μ :=
hg'.continuousOn_mul_of_subset hg hK hK.measurableSet Subset.rfl
end Mul
section SMul
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
theorem IntegrableOn.continuousOn_smul [T2Space X] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X 𝕜] {g : X → E}
(hg : IntegrableOn g K μ) {f : X → 𝕜} (hf : ContinuousOn f K) (hK : IsCompact K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => f x • g x) K μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, ← integrable_norm_iff]
· simp_rw [norm_smul]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul ?_ hg.norm hK
exact continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf
· exact (hf.aestronglyMeasurable hK.measurableSet).smul hg.1
theorem IntegrableOn.smul_continuousOn [T2Space X] [SecondCountableTopologyEither X E] {f : X → 𝕜}
(hf : IntegrableOn f K μ) {g : X → E} (hg : ContinuousOn g K) (hK : IsCompact K) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => f x • g x) K μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, ← integrable_norm_iff]
· simp_rw [norm_smul]
refine IntegrableOn.mul_continuousOn hf.norm ?_ hK
exact continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hg
· exact hf.1.smul (hg.aestronglyMeasurable hK.measurableSet)
end SMul
namespace LocallyIntegrableOn
theorem continuousOn_mul [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] [NormedRing R]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X R] {f g : X → R} {s : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => g x * f x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).continuousOn_mul (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
theorem mul_continuousOn [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] [NormedRing R]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X R] {f g : X → R} {s : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => f x * g x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).mul_continuousOn (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
theorem continuousOn_smul [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : X → E} {g : X → 𝕜} {s : Set X}
(hs : IsLocallyClosed s) (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => g x • f x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).continuousOn_smul (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
theorem smul_continuousOn [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither X E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {f : X → 𝕜} {g : X → E} {s : Set X}
(hs : IsLocallyClosed s) (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => f x • g x) s μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff hs] at hf ⊢
exact fun k hk_sub hk_c => (hf k hk_sub hk_c).smul_continuousOn (hg.mono hk_sub) hk_c
| end LocallyIntegrableOn
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 688 | 693 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
| typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 452 | 457 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
| compl_sup_distrib _ _
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 623 | 624 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.IsTerminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
/-!
# Initial and terminal objects in a category.
## References
* [Stacks: Initial and final objects](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002B)
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v v₁ v₂ u u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable (C)
/-- A category has a terminal object if it has a limit over the empty diagram.
Use `hasTerminal_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbrev HasTerminal :=
HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{0} PEmpty) C
/-- A category has an initial object if it has a colimit over the empty diagram.
Use `hasInitial_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbrev HasInitial :=
HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{0} PEmpty) C
section Univ
variable (X : C) {F₁ : Discrete.{w} PEmpty ⥤ C} {F₂ : Discrete.{w'} PEmpty ⥤ C}
theorem hasTerminalChangeDiagram (h : HasLimit F₁) : HasLimit F₂ :=
⟨⟨⟨⟨limit F₁, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩,
isLimitChangeEmptyCone C (limit.isLimit F₁) _ (eqToIso rfl)⟩⟩⟩
theorem hasTerminalChangeUniverse [h : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w} PEmpty) C] :
HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w'} PEmpty) C where
has_limit _ := hasTerminalChangeDiagram C (h.1 (Functor.empty C))
theorem hasInitialChangeDiagram (h : HasColimit F₁) : HasColimit F₂ :=
⟨⟨⟨⟨colimit F₁, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩,
isColimitChangeEmptyCocone C (colimit.isColimit F₁) _ (eqToIso rfl)⟩⟩⟩
theorem hasInitialChangeUniverse [h : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w} PEmpty) C] :
HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w'} PEmpty) C where
has_colimit _ := hasInitialChangeDiagram C (h.1 (Functor.empty C))
end Univ
/-- An arbitrary choice of terminal object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊤_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism from any object.
-/
abbrev terminal [HasTerminal C] : C :=
limit (Functor.empty.{0} C)
/-- An arbitrary choice of initial object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊥_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism to any object.
-/
abbrev initial [HasInitial C] : C :=
colimit (Functor.empty.{0} C)
/-- Notation for the terminal object in `C` -/
notation "⊤_ " C:20 => terminal C
/-- Notation for the initial object in `C` -/
notation "⊥_ " C:20 => initial C
section
variable {C}
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has a terminal object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism to it from any other object. -/
theorem hasTerminal_of_unique (X : C) [∀ Y, Nonempty (Y ⟶ X)] [∀ Y, Subsingleton (Y ⟶ X)] :
HasTerminal C where
has_limit F := .mk ⟨_, (isTerminalEquivUnique F X).invFun fun _ ↦
⟨Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty', (Subsingleton.elim · _)⟩⟩
theorem IsTerminal.hasTerminal {X : C} (h : IsTerminal X) : HasTerminal C :=
{ has_limit := fun F => HasLimit.mk ⟨⟨X, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩,
isLimitChangeEmptyCone _ h _ (Iso.refl _)⟩ }
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has an initial object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism from it to any other object. -/
theorem hasInitial_of_unique (X : C) [∀ Y, Nonempty (X ⟶ Y)] [∀ Y, Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y)] :
HasInitial C where
has_colimit F := .mk ⟨_, (isInitialEquivUnique F X).invFun fun _ ↦
⟨Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty', (Subsingleton.elim · _)⟩⟩
theorem IsInitial.hasInitial {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) : HasInitial C where
has_colimit F :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨⟨X, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩, isColimitChangeEmptyCocone _ h _ (Iso.refl _)⟩
/-- The map from an object to the terminal object. -/
abbrev terminal.from [HasTerminal C] (P : C) : P ⟶ ⊤_ C :=
limit.lift (Functor.empty C) (asEmptyCone P)
/-- The map to an object from the initial object. -/
abbrev initial.to [HasInitial C] (P : C) : ⊥_ C ⟶ P :=
colimit.desc (Functor.empty C) (asEmptyCocone P)
/-- A terminal object is terminal. -/
def terminalIsTerminal [HasTerminal C] : IsTerminal (⊤_ C) where
lift _ := terminal.from _
/-- An initial object is initial. -/
def initialIsInitial [HasInitial C] : IsInitial (⊥_ C) where
desc _ := initial.to _
instance uniqueToTerminal [HasTerminal C] (P : C) : Unique (P ⟶ ⊤_ C) :=
isTerminalEquivUnique _ (⊤_ C) terminalIsTerminal P
instance uniqueFromInitial [HasInitial C] (P : C) : Unique (⊥_ C ⟶ P) :=
isInitialEquivUnique _ (⊥_ C) initialIsInitial P
@[ext] theorem terminal.hom_ext [HasTerminal C] {P : C} (f g : P ⟶ ⊤_ C) : f = g := by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩
@[ext] theorem initial.hom_ext [HasInitial C] {P : C} (f g : ⊥_ C ⟶ P) : f = g := by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem terminal.comp_from [HasTerminal C] {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
f ≫ terminal.from Q = terminal.from P := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
-- `initial.to_comp_assoc` does not need the `simp` attribute.
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem initial.to_comp [HasInitial C] {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : initial.to P ≫ f = initial.to Q := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- The (unique) isomorphism between the chosen initial object and any other initial object. -/
@[simps!]
def initialIsoIsInitial [HasInitial C] {P : C} (t : IsInitial P) : ⊥_ C ≅ P :=
initialIsInitial.uniqueUpToIso t
/-- The (unique) isomorphism between the chosen terminal object and any other terminal object. -/
@[simps!]
def terminalIsoIsTerminal [HasTerminal C] {P : C} (t : IsTerminal P) : ⊤_ C ≅ P :=
terminalIsTerminal.uniqueUpToIso t
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is split mono. -/
instance terminal.isSplitMono_from {Y : C} [HasTerminal C] (f : ⊤_ C ⟶ Y) : IsSplitMono f :=
IsTerminal.isSplitMono_from terminalIsTerminal _
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is split epi. -/
instance initial.isSplitEpi_to {Y : C} [HasInitial C] (f : Y ⟶ ⊥_ C) : IsSplitEpi f :=
IsInitial.isSplitEpi_to initialIsInitial _
instance hasInitial_op_of_hasTerminal [HasTerminal C] : HasInitial Cᵒᵖ :=
(initialOpOfTerminal terminalIsTerminal).hasInitial
instance hasTerminal_op_of_hasInitial [HasInitial C] : HasTerminal Cᵒᵖ :=
(terminalOpOfInitial initialIsInitial).hasTerminal
theorem hasTerminal_of_hasInitial_op [HasInitial Cᵒᵖ] : HasTerminal C :=
(terminalUnopOfInitial initialIsInitial).hasTerminal
theorem hasInitial_of_hasTerminal_op [HasTerminal Cᵒᵖ] : HasInitial C :=
(initialUnopOfTerminal terminalIsTerminal).hasInitial
instance {J : Type*} [Category J] {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasTerminal C] :
HasLimit ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const J).obj (⊤_ C)) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone :=
{ pt := ⊤_ C
π := { app := fun _ => terminal.from _ } }
isLimit := { lift := fun _ => terminal.from _ } }
| /-- The limit of the constant `⊤_ C` functor is `⊤_ C`. -/
@[simps hom]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Terminal.lean | 183 | 184 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal.Lemmas
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file, by design, is independent of `NormedSpace` in the import hierarchy. It contains
important specific limit computations in metric spaces, in ordered rings/fields, and in specific
instances of these such as `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis NormedSpace
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Topology Nat uniformity NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
theorem tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem tendsto_one_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1/(n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1
theorem NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← NNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem NNReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ≥0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem EReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {C : EReal} (h : C ≠ ⊥) (h' : C ≠ ⊤) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) = fun n : ℕ ↦ ((C.toReal / n : ℝ) : EReal) := by
ext n
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal h' h, ← coe_coe_eq_natCast n, ← coe_div C.toReal n]
rw [this, ← coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat C.toReal
theorem tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) by simpa
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (_root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1)
theorem NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜]
[Algebra ℝ≥0 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ≥0 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert (continuous_algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜).continuousAt.tendsto.comp
tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero]
theorem tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 𝕜
/-- The limit of `n / (n + x)` is 1, for any constant `x` (valid in `ℝ` or any topological division
algebra over `ℝ`, e.g., `ℂ`).
TODO: introduce a typeclass saying that `1 / n` tends to 0 at top, making it possible to get this
statement simultaneously on `ℚ`, `ℝ` and `ℂ`. -/
theorem tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [DivisionRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜]
[CharZero 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] [IsTopologicalDivisionRing 𝕜] (x : 𝕜) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : 𝕜) / (n + x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert Tendsto.congr' ((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn ↦ _)) _
· exact fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (1 + x / n)
· field_simp [Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn]
· have : 𝓝 (1 : 𝕜) = 𝓝 (1 / (1 + x * (0 : 𝕜))) := by
rw [mul_zero, add_zero, div_one]
rw [this]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.div (tendsto_const_nhds.add ?_) (by simp)
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_
have := ((continuous_algebraMap ℝ 𝕜).tendsto _).comp tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero, Filter.tendsto_atTop'] at this
refine Iff.mpr tendsto_atTop' ?_
intros
simp_all only [comp_apply, map_inv₀, map_natCast]
/-- For any positive `m : ℕ`, `((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)` tends to `0` as `n` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_mod_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have h0 : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, 0 ≤ (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ)) n := by aesop
exact tendsto_bdd_div_atTop_nhds_zero h0
(.of_forall (fun n ↦ cast_le.mpr (mod_lt n hm).le)) tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel {α G : Type*} [GroupWithZero G] {f g : α → G}
{l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓟 {0}ᶜ)) : (fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x := by
filter_upwards [hg.le_comap <| preimage_mem_comap (m := g) (mem_principal_self {0}ᶜ)] with x hx
aesop
/-- If `g` tends to `∞`, then eventually for all `x` we have `(f x / g x) * g x = f x`. -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
(fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x :=
div_mul_cancel <| hg.mono_right <| le_principal_iff.mpr <|
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) <| by simp
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
(hlim.pos_mul_atTop ha hg).congr' (EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop hg)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.den {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
[ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto g l atTop :=
have hlim' : Tendsto (fun x => g x / f x) l (𝓝 a⁻¹) := by
simp_rw [← inv_div (f _)]
exact Filter.Tendsto.inv (f := fun x => f x / g x) hlim
(hlim'.pos_mul_atTop (inv_pos_of_pos ha) hf).congr' (.div_mul_cancel_atTop hf)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `f x / g x` tends to a positive constant, then `f` tends to `∞` if
and only if `g` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num_atTop_iff_den_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [TopologicalSpace K]
[OrderTopology K] [ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto g l atTop :=
⟨fun hf ↦ Tendsto.den hf ha hlim, fun hg ↦ Tendsto.num hg ha hlim⟩
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos
[Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (r + 1) ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone' (pow_right_mono₀ <| le_add_of_nonneg_left h.le) <|
not_bddAbove_iff.2 fun _ ↦ Set.exists_range_iff.2 <| add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
[Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 1 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop atTop :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
theorem Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ m ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt h) ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt h)
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
h₁.eq_or_lt.elim
(fun hr ↦ (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).mp <| by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, ← hr, tendsto_const_nhds])
(fun hr ↦
have := (one_lt_inv₀ hr).2 h₂ |> tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp this).congr fun n ↦ by simp)
@[simp] theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ |r| < 1 := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by_contra (fun hr_le ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· by_cases hr : 1 = |r|
· replace h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ |r|^n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by simpa only [← abs_pow, h]
simp only [hr.symm, one_pow] at h
exact zero_ne_one <| tendsto_nhds_unique h tendsto_const_nhds
· apply @not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop 𝕜 ℕ _ _ _ _ atTop _ (fun n ↦ |r| ^ n) _ 0 _
· refine (pow_right_strictMono₀ <| lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le)
hr).monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop (fun b ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (pow_unbounded_of_one_lt b (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le) hr))
exact ⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩
· simpa only [← abs_pow]
· simpa only [← abs_pow] using (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg r)) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhdsWithin_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[Archimedean 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 < r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2
⟨tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁.le h₂,
tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ pow_pos h₁ _⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow_of_lt_one {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < r)
(h₁ : r < 1) :
(uniformity α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ ↦ True) fun k ↦ { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ k } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ ↦ pow_pos h₀ _) fun _ ε0 ↦
(exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h₁).imp fun _ hk ↦ ⟨trivial, hk.le⟩
theorem geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, c * u k < u (k + 1)) : c ^ n * u 0 < u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn _ _ h
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem geom_le {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, c * u k ≤ u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 ≤ u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ _ h <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem lt_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) < c * u k) : u n < c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn _ h _
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem le_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) ≤ c * u k) :
u n ≤ c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ h _ <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k * v n ≤ v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_geom_le {v : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hc : 1 < c)
(hu : ∀ n, c * v n ≤ v (n + 1)) : Tendsto v atTop atTop :=
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun n ↦ geom_le (zero_le_one.trans hc.le) n fun k _ ↦ hu k) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt hc).atTop_mul_const h₀
theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.1 <| by
simp only [NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_zero,
_root_.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr]
@[simp]
protected theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [coe_pow, coe_zero, abs_eq, coe_lt_one, val_eq_coe] using
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp <| tendsto_coe.mpr h, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero]
norm_cast at *
apply NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
lift r to NNReal
· refine fun hr ↦ top_ne_zero (tendsto_nhds_unique (EventuallyEq.tendsto ?_) (hr ▸ h))
exact eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨1, fun _ hn ↦ pow_eq_top_iff.mpr ⟨rfl, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mp hn⟩⟩
rw [← coe_zero] at h
norm_cast at h ⊢
exact NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp h
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_top_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ r^n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) ↔ 1 < r := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· contrapose!
intro r_le_one h_tends
specialize h_tends (Ioi_mem_nhds one_lt_top)
simp only [Filter.mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, ge_iff_le, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Ioi] at h_tends
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h_tends
exact lt_irrefl _ <| lt_of_lt_of_le (hn n le_rfl) <| pow_le_one₀ (zero_le _) r_le_one
· intro r_gt_one
have obs := @Tendsto.inv ℝ≥0∞ ℕ _ _ _ (fun n ↦ (r⁻¹)^n) atTop 0
simp only [ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff, inv_zero] at obs
simpa [← ENNReal.inv_pow] using obs <| ENNReal.inv_lt_one.mpr r_gt_one
lemma ENNReal.eq_zero_of_le_mul_pow {x r : ℝ≥0∞} {ε : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≤ ε * r ^ n) : x = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine ge_of_tendsto' (f := fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ε * r ^ n) (x := atTop) ?_ h
rw [← mul_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞) (a := ε)]
exact Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr) (Or.inr coe_ne_top)
/-! ### Geometric series -/
section Geometric
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have : r ≠ 1 := ne_of_lt h₂
have : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
(hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr <| by
simp_all [neg_inv, geom_sum_eq, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem summable_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
theorem hasSum_geometric_two : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) 2 := by
convert hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one _ _ <;> norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_two⟩
theorem summable_geometric_two_encode {ι : Type*} [Encodable ι] :
Summable fun i : ι ↦ (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ Encodable.encode i :=
summable_geometric_two.comp_injective Encodable.encode_injective
theorem tsum_geometric_two : (∑' n : ℕ, ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) = 2 :=
hasSum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
theorem sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i) ≤ 2 := by
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i := by
intro i
apply pow_nonneg
norm_num
convert summable_geometric_two.sum_le_tsum (range n) (fun i _ ↦ this i)
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two : (∑' n : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ n) = 2 :=
(inv_eq_one_div (2 : ℝ)).symm ▸ tsum_geometric_two
/-- The sum of `2⁻¹ ^ i` for `n ≤ i` equals `2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n`. -/
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two_ge (n : ℕ) :
(∑' i, ite (n ≤ i) ((2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ i) 0) = 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n := by
have A : Summable fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0 := by
simpa only [← piecewise_eq_indicator, one_div]
using summable_geometric_two.indicator {i | n ≤ i}
have B : ((Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0) = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi ↦
ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h ↦ (lt_irrefl _ ((Finset.mem_range.1 hi).trans_le h)).elim
simp only [← Summable.sum_add_tsum_nat_add n A, B, if_true, zero_add, zero_le',
le_add_iff_nonneg_left, pow_add, _root_.tsum_mul_right, tsum_geometric_inv_two]
theorem hasSum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n) a := by
convert HasSum.mul_left (a / 2)
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one) using 1
· funext n
simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
rfl
· norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n :=
⟨a, hasSum_geometric_two' a⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : ∑' n : ℕ, a / 2 / 2 ^ n = a :=
(hasSum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
/-- **Sum of a Geometric Series** -/
theorem NNReal.hasSum_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
apply NNReal.hasSum_coe.1
push_cast
rw [NNReal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)]
exact hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr
theorem NNReal.summable_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
@[simp]
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
rcases lt_or_le r 1 with hr | hr
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
norm_cast at *
convert ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq (NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr)
rw [ENNReal.coe_inv <| ne_of_gt <| tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr, coe_sub, coe_one]
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hr, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_eq_top]
refine fun a ha ↦
(ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp fun n hn ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hn ?_
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ range n, 1 := by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range n, r ^ i := by gcongr; apply one_le_pow₀ hr
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric_add_one (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ (n + 1) = r * (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ', ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
end Geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section EdistLeGeometric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (r C : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C * r ^ n)
include hr hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric : CauchySeq f := by
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu ?_
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top hC (ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 ?_)
exact (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne'
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ C * r ^ n / (1 - r) := by
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _
simp only [pow_add, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) := by
simpa only [_root_.pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end EdistLeGeometric
section EdistLeGeometricTwo
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C / 2 ^ n) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a))
include hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : CauchySeq f := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at hu
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C ?_ hC hu
simp [ENNReal.one_lt_two]
include hu ha in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C * 2^-n`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto (n : ℕ) : edist (f n) a ≤ 2 * C / 2 ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at *
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm]
convert edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto 2⁻¹ C hu ha n using 1
rw [ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
include hu ha in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ : edist (f 0) a ≤ 2 * C := by
simpa only [_root_.pow_zero, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_one, mul_one] using
edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto C hu ha 0
end EdistLeGeometricTwo
section LeGeometric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r C : ℝ} {f : ℕ → α}
section
variable (hr : r < 1) (hu : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C * r ^ n)
include hr hu
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem aux_hasSum_of_le_geometric : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ C * r ^ n) (C / (1 - r)) := by
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg fun n ↦ dist_nonneg.trans (hu n) with (rfl | ⟨_, r₀⟩)
· simp [hasSum_zero]
· refine HasSum.mul_left C ?_
simpa using hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one r₀ hr
variable (r C)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.
Note that this lemma does not assume `0 ≤ C` or `0 ≤ r`. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_le_geometric : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu ⟨_, aux_hasSum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
(aux_hasSum_of_le_geometric hr hu).tsum_eq ▸
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu ⟨_, aux_hasSum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩ ha
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ C * r ^ n / (1 - r) := by
have := aux_hasSum_of_le_geometric hr hu
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ⟨_, this⟩ ha n
simp only [pow_add, mul_left_comm C, mul_div_right_comm]
rw [mul_comm]
exact (this.mul_left _).tsum_eq.symm
end
variable (hu₂ : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C / 2 / 2 ^ n)
include hu₂
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_le_geometric_two : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu₂ <| ⟨_, hasSum_geometric_two' C⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C`. -/
theorem dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C :=
tsum_geometric_two' C ▸ dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / 2^n`. -/
theorem dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ C / 2 ^ n := by
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha n
simp only [add_comm n, pow_add, ← div_div]
symm
exact ((hasSum_geometric_two' C).div_const _).tsum_eq
end LeGeometric
/-! ### Summability tests based on comparison with geometric series -/
/-- A series whose terms are bounded by the terms of a converging geometric series converges. -/
theorem summable_one_div_pow_of_le {m : ℝ} {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hm : 1 < m) (fi : ∀ i, i ≤ f i) :
Summable fun i ↦ 1 / m ^ f i := by
refine .of_nonneg_of_le (fun a ↦ by positivity) (fun a ↦ ?_)
(summable_geometric_of_lt_one (one_div_nonneg.mpr (zero_le_one.trans hm.le))
((one_div_lt (zero_lt_one.trans hm) zero_lt_one).mpr (one_div_one.le.trans_lt hm)))
rw [div_pow, one_pow]
refine (one_div_le_one_div ?_ ?_).mpr (pow_right_mono₀ hm.le (fi a)) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hm) _
/-! ### Positive sequences with small sums on countable types -/
/-- For any positive `ε`, define on an encodable type a positive sequence with sum less than `ε` -/
def posSumOfEncodable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) (ι) [Encodable ι] :
{ ε' : ι → ℝ // (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃ c, HasSum ε' c ∧ c ≤ ε } := by
let f n := ε / 2 / 2 ^ n
have hf : HasSum f ε := hasSum_geometric_two' _
have f0 : ∀ n, 0 < f n := fun n ↦ div_pos (half_pos hε) (pow_pos zero_lt_two _)
refine ⟨f ∘ Encodable.encode, fun i ↦ f0 _, ?_⟩
rcases hf.summable.comp_injective (@Encodable.encode_injective ι _) with ⟨c, hg⟩
refine ⟨c, hg, hasSum_le_inj _ (@Encodable.encode_injective ι _) ?_ ?_ hg hf⟩
· intro i _
exact le_of_lt (f0 _)
· intro n
exact le_rfl
theorem Set.Countable.exists_pos_hasSum_le {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Countable) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ ε' : ι → ℝ, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃ c, HasSum (fun i : s ↦ ε' i) c ∧ c ≤ ε := by
classical
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rcases posSumOfEncodable hε s with ⟨f, hf0, ⟨c, hfc, hcε⟩⟩
| refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : i ∈ s then f ⟨i, h⟩ else 1, fun i ↦ ?_, ⟨c, ?_, hcε⟩⟩
· conv_rhs => simp
split_ifs
exacts [hf0 _, zero_lt_one]
· simpa only [Subtype.coe_prop, dif_pos, Subtype.coe_eta]
theorem Set.Countable.exists_pos_forall_sum_le {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Countable) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ ε' : ι → ℝ,
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Basic.lean | 563 | 570 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Sanyam Gupta, Omar Haddad, David Lowry-Duda,
Lorenzo Luccioli, Pietro Monticone, Alexis Saurin, Florent Schaffhauser
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.FLT.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.PID
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Three
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Lemmas
/-!
# Fermat Last Theorem in the case `n = 3`
The goal of this file is to prove Fermat's Last Theorem in the case `n = 3`.
## Main results
* `fermatLastTheoremThree`: Fermat's Last Theorem for `n = 3`: if `a b c : ℕ` are all non-zero then
`a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3`.
## Implementation details
We follow the proof in <https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~marc.hindry/Cours-arith.pdf>, page 43.
The strategy is the following:
* The so called "Case 1", when `3 ∣ a * b * c` is completely elementary and is proved using
congruences modulo `9`.
* To prove case 2, we consider the generalized equation `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3`, where `a`, `b`,
and `c` are in the cyclotomic ring `ℤ[ζ₃]` (where `ζ₃` is a primitive cube root of unity) and `u`
is a unit of `ℤ[ζ₃]`. `FermatLastTheoremForThree_of_FermatLastTheoremThreeGen` (whose proof is
rather elementary on paper) says that to prove Fermat's last theorem for exponent `3`, it is
enough to prove that this equation has no solutions such that `c ≠ 0`, `¬ λ ∣ a`, `¬ λ ∣ b`,
`λ ∣ c` and `IsCoprime a b` (where we set `λ := ζ₃ - 1`). We call such a tuple a `Solution'`.
A `Solution` is the same as a `Solution'` with the additional assumption that `λ ^ 2 ∣ a + b`.
We then prove that, given `S' : Solution'`, there is `S : Solution` such that the multiplicity of
`λ = ζ₃ - 1` in `c` is the same in `S'` and `S` (see `exists_Solution_of_Solution'`).
In particular it is enough to prove that no `Solution` exists. The key point is a descent argument
on the multiplicity of `λ` in `c`: starting with `S : Solution` we can find `S₁ : Solution` with
multiplicity strictly smaller (see `exists_Solution_multiplicity_lt`) and this finishes the proof.
To construct `S₁` we go through a `Solution'` and then back to a `Solution`. More importantly, we
cannot control the unit `u`, and this is the reason why we need to consider the generalized
equation `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3`. The construction is completely explicit, but it depends
crucially on `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three.eq_one_or_neg_one_of_unit_of_congruent`, a special
case of Kummer's lemma.
* Note that we don't prove Case 1 for the generalized equation (in particular we don't prove that
the generalized equation has no nontrivial solutions). This is because the proof, even if
elementary on paper, would be quite annoying to formalize: indeed it involves a lot of explicit
computations in `ℤ[ζ₃] / (λ)`: this ring is isomorphic to `ℤ / 9ℤ`, but of course, even if we
construct such an isomorphism, tactics like `decide` would not work.
-/
section case1
open ZMod
private lemma cube_of_castHom_ne_zero {n : ZMod 9} :
castHom (show 3 ∣ 9 by norm_num) (ZMod 3) n ≠ 0 → n ^ 3 = 1 ∨ n ^ 3 = 8 := by
revert n; decide
private lemma cube_of_not_dvd {n : ℤ} (h : ¬ 3 ∣ n) :
(n : ZMod 9) ^ 3 = 1 ∨ (n : ZMod 9) ^ 3 = 8 := by
apply cube_of_castHom_ne_zero
rwa [map_intCast, Ne, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
/-- If `a b c : ℤ` are such that `¬ 3 ∣ a * b * c`, then `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3`. -/
theorem fermatLastTheoremThree_case_1 {a b c : ℤ} (hdvd : ¬ 3 ∣ a * b * c) :
a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3 := by
simp_rw [Int.prime_three.dvd_mul, not_or] at hdvd
apply mt (congrArg (Int.cast : ℤ → ZMod 9))
simp_rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_pow]
rcases cube_of_not_dvd hdvd.1.1 with ha | ha <;>
rcases cube_of_not_dvd hdvd.1.2 with hb | hb <;>
rcases cube_of_not_dvd hdvd.2 with hc | hc <;>
rw [ha, hb, hc] <;> decide
end case1
section case2
private lemma three_dvd_b_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 {a b c : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(Hgcd : Finset.gcd {a, b, c} id = 1) (h3a : 3 ∣ a) (HF : a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 + c ^ 3 = 0)
(H : ∀ a b c : ℤ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ 3 ∣ a → ¬ 3 ∣ b → 3 ∣ c → IsCoprime a b → a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3) :
3 ∣ b := by
have hbc : IsCoprime (-b) (-c) := by
refine IsCoprime.neg_neg ?_
rw [add_comm (a ^ 3), add_assoc, add_comm (a ^ 3), ← add_assoc] at HF
refine isCoprime_of_gcd_eq_one_of_FLT ?_ HF
convert Hgcd using 2
rw [Finset.pair_comm, Finset.insert_comm]
by_contra! h3b
by_cases h3c : 3 ∣ c
· apply h3b
rw [add_assoc, add_comm (b ^ 3), ← add_assoc] at HF
exact dvd_c_of_prime_of_dvd_a_of_dvd_b_of_FLT Int.prime_three h3a h3c HF
· refine H (-b) (-c) a ha (by simp [h3b]) (by simp [h3c]) h3a hbc ?_
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← (show Odd 3 by decide).neg_pow] at HF
rw [← HF]
ring
open Finset in
private lemma fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 {a b c : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h3a : 3 ∣ a) (Hgcd : Finset.gcd {a, b, c} id = 1)
(H : ∀ a b c : ℤ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ 3 ∣ a → ¬ 3 ∣ b → 3 ∣ c → IsCoprime a b → a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3) :
a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 + c ^ 3 ≠ 0 := by
intro HF
apply (show ¬(3 ∣ (1 : ℤ)) by decide)
rw [← Hgcd]
refine dvd_gcd (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_insert, mem_singleton] at hx
have h3b : 3 ∣ b := by
refine three_dvd_b_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 ha ?_ h3a HF H
simp only [← Hgcd, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← Int.abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
rcases hx with hx | hx | hx
· exact hx ▸ h3a
· exact hx ▸ h3b
· simpa [hx] using dvd_c_of_prime_of_dvd_a_of_dvd_b_of_FLT Int.prime_three h3a h3b HF
open Finset Int in
/--
To prove Fermat's Last Theorem for `n = 3`, it is enough to show that for all `a`, `b`, `c`
in `ℤ` such that `c ≠ 0`, `¬ 3 ∣ a`, `¬ 3 ∣ b`, `a` and `b` are coprime and `3 ∣ c`, we have
`a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3`.
-/
theorem fermatLastTheoremThree_of_three_dvd_only_c
(H : ∀ a b c : ℤ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ 3 ∣ a → ¬ 3 ∣ b → 3 ∣ c → IsCoprime a b → a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3) :
FermatLastTheoremFor 3 := by
rw [fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_int]
refine fermatLastTheoremWith_of_fermatLastTheoremWith_coprime (fun a b c ha hb hc Hgcd hF ↦?_)
by_cases h1 : 3 ∣ a * b * c
swap
· exact fermatLastTheoremThree_case_1 h1 hF
rw [(prime_three).dvd_mul, (prime_three).dvd_mul] at h1
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, ← (show Odd 3 by decide).neg_pow] at hF
rcases h1 with (h3a | h3b) | h3c
· refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 ha h3a ?_ H hF
simp only [← Hgcd, insert_comm, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
· rw [add_comm (a ^ 3)] at hF
refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 hb h3b ?_ H hF
simp only [← Hgcd, insert_comm, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
· rw [add_comm _ ((-c) ^ 3), ← add_assoc] at hF
refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 (neg_ne_zero.2 hc) (by simp [h3c])
?_ H hF
rw [Finset.insert_comm (-c), Finset.pair_comm (-c) b]
simp only [← Hgcd, insert_comm, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
section eisenstein
open NumberField IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable {ζ : K} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (3 : ℕ+))
local notation3 "η" => (IsPrimitiveRoot.isUnit (hζ.toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot) (by decide)).unit
local notation3 "λ" => hζ.toInteger - 1
/-- `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen` is the statement that `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3` has no
nontrivial solutions in `𝓞 K` for all `u : (𝓞 K)ˣ` such that `¬ λ ∣ a`, `¬ λ ∣ b` and `λ ∣ c`.
The reason to consider `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen` is to make a descent argument working. -/
def FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen : Prop :=
∀ a b c : 𝓞 K, ∀ u : (𝓞 K)ˣ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ λ ∣ a → ¬ λ ∣ b → λ ∣ c → IsCoprime a b →
a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ u * c ^ 3
/-- To prove `FermatLastTheoremFor 3`, it is enough to prove `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen`. -/
lemma FermatLastTheoremForThree_of_FermatLastTheoremThreeGen
[NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] :
FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen hζ → FermatLastTheoremFor 3 := by
intro H
refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_three_dvd_only_c (fun a b c hc ha hb ⟨x, hx⟩ hcoprime h ↦ ?_)
refine H a b c 1 (by simp [hc]) (fun hdvd ↦ ha ?_) (fun hdvd ↦ hb ?_) ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [← Ideal.norm_dvd_iff (hζ.prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)),
hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)] at hdvd
· rwa [← Ideal.norm_dvd_iff (hζ.prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)),
hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)] at hdvd
· exact dvd_trans hζ.toInteger_sub_one_dvd_prime' ⟨x, by simp [hx]⟩
· rw [show a = algebraMap _ (𝓞 K) a by simp, show b = algebraMap _ (𝓞 K) b by simp]
exact hcoprime.map _
· simp only [Units.val_one, one_mul]
exact_mod_cast h
namespace FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen
/-- `Solution'` is a tuple given by a solution to `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3`,
where `a`, `b`, `c` and `u` are as in `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen`.
See `Solution` for the actual structure on which we will do the descent. -/
structure Solution' where
a : 𝓞 K
b : 𝓞 K
c : 𝓞 K
u : (𝓞 K)ˣ
ha : ¬ λ ∣ a
hb : ¬ λ ∣ b
hc : c ≠ 0
coprime : IsCoprime a b
hcdvd : λ ∣ c
H : a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.a
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.b
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.c
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.u
/-- `Solution` is the same as `Solution'` with the additional assumption that `λ ^ 2 ∣ a + b`. -/
structure Solution extends Solution' hζ where
hab : λ ^ 2 ∣ a + b
variable {hζ}
variable (S : Solution hζ) (S' : Solution' hζ)
section IsCyclotomicExtension
variable [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K]
/-- For any `S' : Solution'`, the multiplicity of `λ` in `S'.c` is finite. -/
lemma Solution'.multiplicity_lambda_c_finite :
FiniteMultiplicity (hζ.toInteger - 1) S'.c :=
.of_not_isUnit hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime'.not_unit S'.hc
/-- Given `S' : Solution'`, `S'.multiplicity` is the multiplicity of `λ` in `S'.c`, as a natural
number. -/
noncomputable def Solution'.multiplicity :=
_root_.multiplicity (hζ.toInteger - 1) S'.c
/-- Given `S : Solution`, `S.multiplicity` is the multiplicity of `λ` in `S.c`, as a natural
number. -/
noncomputable def Solution.multiplicity := S.toSolution'.multiplicity
/-- We say that `S : Solution` is minimal if for all `S₁ : Solution`, the multiplicity of `λ` in
`S.c` is less or equal than the multiplicity in `S₁.c`. -/
def Solution.isMinimal : Prop := ∀ (S₁ : Solution hζ), S.multiplicity ≤ S₁.multiplicity
| omit [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] in
include S in
/-- If there is a solution then there is a minimal one. -/
lemma Solution.exists_minimal : ∃ (S₁ : Solution hζ), S₁.isMinimal := by
classical
let T := {n | ∃ (S' : Solution hζ), S'.multiplicity = n}
rcases Nat.find_spec (⟨S.multiplicity, ⟨S, rfl⟩⟩ : T.Nonempty) with ⟨S₁, hS₁⟩
exact ⟨S₁, fun S'' ↦ hS₁ ▸ Nat.find_min' _ ⟨S'', rfl⟩⟩
/-- Given `S' : Solution'`, then `S'.a` and `S'.b` are both congruent to `1` modulo `λ ^ 4` or are
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Three.lean | 229 | 238 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Convex
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.DoubleFactorial
/-!
# Gaussian integral
We prove various versions of the formula for the Gaussian integral:
* `integral_gaussian`: for real `b` we have `∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = √(π / b)`.
* `integral_gaussian_complex`: for complex `b` with `0 < re b` we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2)`.
* `integral_gaussian_Ioi` and `integral_gaussian_complex_Ioi`: variants for integrals over `Ioi 0`.
* `Complex.Gamma_one_half_eq`: the formula `Γ (1 / 2) = √π`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Real Topology
open Complex hiding exp abs_of_nonneg
theorem exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg {p b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (hp : 1 < p) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
suffices Tendsto (fun x => x * (b * x ^ (p - 1) + -1)) atTop atTop by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ this
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)) (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [rpow_sub_one hx.ne']
field_simp [hx.ne']
ring
apply tendsto_id.atTop_mul_atTop₀
refine tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop (-1 : ℝ) ?_
exact Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith))
theorem exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb one_lt_two
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg (s : ℝ) {b p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
| apply ((isBigO_refl (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s) atTop).mul_isLittleO
(exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb hp)).trans
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO s
theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (s : ℝ) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/GaussianIntegral.lean | 51 | 55 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.