Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
|
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 693 | 695 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 343 | 344 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Composition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.HasLocalization
/-! The category of homological complexes up to quasi-isomorphisms
Given a category `C` with homology and any complex shape `c`, we define
the category `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` which is the localized
category of `HomologicalComplex C c` with respect to quasi-isomorphisms.
When `C` is abelian, this will be the derived category of `C` in the
particular case of the complex shape `ComplexShape.up ℤ`.
Under suitable assumptions on `c` (e.g. chain complexes, or cochain
complexes indexed by `ℤ`), we shall show that `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c`
is also the localized category of `HomotopyCategory C c` with respect to
the class of quasi-isomorphisms.
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits
section
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) [HasZeroMorphisms C]
[CategoryWithHomology C]
lemma HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso (i : ι) :
(quasiIso C c).IsInvertedBy (homologyFunctor C c i) := fun _ _ _ hf => by
rw [mem_quasiIso_iff] at hf
dsimp
infer_instance
variable [(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization]
/-- The category of homological complexes up to quasi-isomorphisms. -/
abbrev HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso := (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).Localization'
variable {C c} in
/-- The localization functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c`. -/
abbrev HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q :
HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c :=
(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).Q'
namespace HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
/-- The homology functor `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c ⥤ C` for each `i : ι`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctor (i : ι) : HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c ⥤ C :=
Localization.lift _ (HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso C c i) Q
/-- The homology functor on `HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso C c` is induced by
the homology functor on `HomologicalComplex C c`. -/
noncomputable def homologyFunctorFactors (i : ι) :
Q ⋙ homologyFunctor C c i ≅ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor C c i :=
Localization.fac _ (HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor_inverts_quasiIso C c i) Q
variable {C c}
lemma isIso_Q_map_iff_mem_quasiIso {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} (f : K ⟶ L) :
IsIso (Q.map f) ↔ HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c f := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff, quasiIso_iff]
intro i
rw [quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap]
refine (NatIso.isIso_map_iff (homologyFunctorFactors C c i) f).1 ?_
dsimp
infer_instance
· intro h
exact Localization.inverts Q (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c) _ h
end HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso
end
section
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι) [Preadditive C]
[CategoryWithHomology C]
lemma HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q_inverts_homotopyEquivalences
[(HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c).HasLocalization] :
(HomologicalComplex.homotopyEquivalences C c).IsInvertedBy
HomologicalComplexUpToQuasiIso.Q :=
MorphismProperty.IsInvertedBy.of_le _ _ _
(Localization.inverts Q (HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c))
(homotopyEquivalences_le_quasiIso C c)
namespace HomotopyCategory
/-- The class of quasi-isomorphisms in the homotopy category. -/
def quasiIso : MorphismProperty (HomotopyCategory C c) :=
fun _ _ f => ∀ (i : ι), IsIso ((homologyFunctor C c i).map f)
variable {C c}
lemma mem_quasiIso_iff {X Y : HomotopyCategory C c} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
quasiIso C c f ↔ ∀ (n : ι), IsIso ((homologyFunctor _ _ n).map f) := by
rfl
| lemma quotient_map_mem_quasiIso_iff {K L : HomologicalComplex C c} (f : K ⟶ L) :
quasiIso C c ((quotient C c).map f) ↔ HomologicalComplex.quasiIso C c f := by
have eq := fun (i : ι) => NatIso.isIso_map_iff (homologyFunctorFactors C c i) f
dsimp at eq
simp only [HomologicalComplex.mem_quasiIso_iff, mem_quasiIso_iff, quasiIso_iff,
quasiIsoAt_iff_isIso_homologyMap, eq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Localization.lean | 108 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FormalMultilinearSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
/-!
# Analytic functions
A function is analytic in one dimension around `0` if it can be written as a converging power series
`Σ pₙ zⁿ`. This definition can be extended to any dimension (even in infinite dimension) by
requiring that `pₙ` is a continuous `n`-multilinear map. In general, `pₙ` is not unique (in two
dimensions, taking `p₂ (x, y) (x', y') = x y'` or `y x'` gives the same map when applied to a
vector `(x, y) (x, y)`). A way to guarantee uniqueness is to take a symmetric `pₙ`, but this is not
always possible in nonzero characteristic (in characteristic 2, the previous example has no
symmetric representative). Therefore, we do not insist on symmetry or uniqueness in the definition,
and we only require the existence of a converging series.
The general framework is important to say that the exponential map on bounded operators on a Banach
space is analytic, as well as the inverse on invertible operators.
## Main definitions
Let `p` be a formal multilinear series from `E` to `F`, i.e., `p n` is a multilinear map on `E^n`
for `n : ℕ`.
* `p.radius`: the largest `r : ℝ≥0∞` such that `‖p n‖ * r^n` grows subexponentially.
* `p.le_radius_of_bound`, `p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal`, `p.le_radius_of_isBigO`: if `‖p n‖ * r ^ n`
is bounded above, then `r ≤ p.radius`;
* `p.isLittleO_of_lt_radius`, `p.norm_mul_pow_le_mul_pow_of_lt_radius`,
`p.isLittleO_one_of_lt_radius`,
`p.norm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`, `p.nnnorm_mul_pow_le_of_lt_radius`: if `r < p.radius`, then
`‖p n‖ * r ^ n` tends to zero exponentially;
* `p.lt_radius_of_isBigO`: if `r ≠ 0` and `‖p n‖ * r ^ n = O(a ^ n)` for some `-1 < a < 1`, then
`r < p.radius`;
* `p.partialSum n x`: the sum `∑_{i = 0}^{n-1} pᵢ xⁱ`.
* `p.sum x`: the sum `∑'_{i = 0}^{∞} pᵢ xⁱ`.
Additionally, let `f` be a function from `E` to `F`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`: on the ball of center `x` with radius `r`,
`f (x + y) = ∑'_n pₙ yⁿ`.
* `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`: on some ball of center `x` with positive radius, holds
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r`.
* `AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x`: there exists a power series `p` such that holds `HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x`.
* `AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s`: the function `f` is analytic at every point of `s`.
We also define versions of `HasFPowerSeriesOnBall`, `AnalyticAt`, and `AnalyticOnNhd` restricted to
a set, similar to `ContinuousWithinAt`. See `Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Within` for basic properties.
* `AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` means a power series at `x` converges to `f` on `𝓝[s ∪ {x}] x`.
* `AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s t` means `∀ x ∈ t, AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x`.
We develop the basic properties of these notions, notably:
* If a function admits a power series, it is continuous (see
`HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.continuousOn` and `HasFPowerSeriesAt.continuousAt` and
`AnalyticAt.continuousAt`).
* In a complete space, the sum of a formal power series with positive radius is well defined on the
disk of convergence, see `FormalMultilinearSeries.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall`.
## Implementation details
We only introduce the radius of convergence of a power series, as `p.radius`.
For a power series in finitely many dimensions, there is a finer (directional, coordinate-dependent)
notion, describing the polydisk of convergence. This notion is more specific, and not necessary to
build the general theory. We do not define it here.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
open Topology NNReal Filter ENNReal Set Asymptotics
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.sum x` is the sum `Σ pₙ xⁿ`. A
priori, it only behaves well when `‖x‖ < p.radius`. -/
protected def sum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (x : E) : F :=
∑' n : ℕ, p n fun _ => x
/-- Given a formal multilinear series `p` and a vector `x`, then `p.partialSum n x` is the sum
`Σ pₖ xᵏ` for `k ∈ {0,..., n-1}`. -/
def partialSum (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) (x : E) : F :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, p k fun _ : Fin k => x
/-- The partial sums of a formal multilinear series are continuous. -/
theorem partialSum_continuous (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (p.partialSum n) := by
unfold partialSum
fun_prop
end FormalMultilinearSeries
/-! ### The radius of a formal multilinear series -/
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
namespace FormalMultilinearSeries
variable (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) {r : ℝ≥0}
/-- The radius of a formal multilinear series is the largest `r` such that the sum `Σ ‖pₙ‖ ‖y‖ⁿ`
converges for all `‖y‖ < r`. This implies that `Σ pₙ yⁿ` converges for all `‖y‖ < r`, but these
definitions are *not* equivalent in general. -/
def radius (p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (r : ℝ≥0) (C : ℝ) (_ : ∀ n, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C), (r : ℝ≥0∞)
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound (C : ℝ) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
le_iSup_of_le r <| le_iSup_of_le C <| le_iSup (fun _ => (r : ℝ≥0∞)) h
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` is bounded in `n`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (C : ℝ≥0) {r : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n ≤ C) :
(r : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => mod_cast h n
/-- If `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ = O(1)`, as `n → ∞`, then the radius of `p` is at least `r`. -/
theorem le_radius_of_isBigO (h : (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
Exists.elim (isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff.1 h) fun C hC =>
p.le_radius_of_bound C fun n => (le_abs_self _).trans (hC n)
theorem le_radius_of_eventually_le (C) (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n ≤ C) :
↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_isBigO <| IsBigO.of_bound C <| h.mono fun n hn => by simpa
theorem le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_bound_nnreal (∑' n, ‖p n‖₊ * r ^ n) fun _ => h.le_tsum' _
theorem le_radius_of_summable (h : Summable fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) : ↑r ≤ p.radius :=
p.le_radius_of_summable_nnnorm <| by
simp only [← coe_nnnorm] at h
exact mod_cast h
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO
(h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =O[atTop] fun _ => (1 : ℝ)) : p.radius = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => p.le_radius_of_isBigO (h r)
theorem radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero (h : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, p n = 0) : p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_isBigO fun r =>
(isBigO_zero _ _).congr' (h.mono fun n hn => by simp [hn]) EventuallyEq.rfl
theorem radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ m, p (m + n) = 0) :
p.radius = ∞ :=
p.radius_eq_top_of_eventually_eq_zero <|
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n, fun _ hk => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hk ▸ hn _⟩
@[simp]
theorem constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius {v : F} :
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius = ⊤ :=
(constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v).radius_eq_top_of_forall_image_add_eq_zero 1
(by simp [constFormalMultilinearSeries])
/-- `0` has infinite radius of convergence -/
@[simp] lemma zero_radius : (0 : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F).radius = ∞ := by
rw [← constFormalMultilinearSeries_zero]
exact constFormalMultilinearSeries_radius
/-- For `r` strictly smaller than the radius of `p`, then `‖pₙ‖ rⁿ` tends to zero exponentially:
for some `0 < a < 1`, `‖p n‖ rⁿ = o(aⁿ)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_of_lt_radius (h : ↑r < p.radius) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1, (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) =o[atTop] (a ^ ·) := by
have := (TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4
rw [this]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [(TFAE_exists_lt_isLittleO_pow (fun n => ‖p n‖ * (r : ℝ) ^ n) 1).out 1 4]
| simp only [radius, lt_iSup_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, C, hC, rt⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe] at rt
have : 0 < (t : ℝ) := r.coe_nonneg.trans_lt rt
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/Basic.lean | 180 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
| rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 657 | 660 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Integral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
/-!
# Integral and algebraic elements of a fraction field
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S]
open Polynomial
namespace IsLocalization
section IntegerNormalization
open Polynomial
variable [IsLocalization M S]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `coeffIntegerNormalization p` gives the coefficients of the polynomial
`integerNormalization p` -/
noncomputable def coeffIntegerNormalization (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) : R :=
if hi : i ∈ p.support then
Classical.choose
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
else 0
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) (h : coeff p i = 0) :
coeffIntegerNormalization M p i = 0 := by
simp only [coeffIntegerNormalization, h, mem_support_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
dif_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ)
(h : coeffIntegerNormalization M p i ≠ 0) : i ∈ p.support := by
contrapose h
rw [Ne, Classical.not_not, coeffIntegerNormalization, dif_neg h]
/-- `integerNormalization g` normalizes `g` to have integer coefficients
by clearing the denominators -/
noncomputable def integerNormalization (p : S[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (coeffIntegerNormalization M p i)
@[simp]
theorem integerNormalization_coeff (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) :
(integerNormalization M p).coeff i = coeffIntegerNormalization M p i := by
simp +contextual [integerNormalization, coeff_monomial,
coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support]
theorem integerNormalization_spec (p : S[X]) :
∃ b : M, ∀ i, algebraMap R S ((integerNormalization M p).coeff i) = (b : R) • p.coeff i := by
classical
use Classical.choose (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
intro i
rw [integerNormalization_coeff, coeffIntegerNormalization]
split_ifs with hi
· exact
Classical.choose_spec
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· rw [RingHom.map_zero, not_mem_support_iff.mp hi, smul_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert (smul_zero _).symm, ...`
theorem integerNormalization_map_to_map (p : S[X]) :
∃ b : M, (integerNormalization M p).map (algebraMap R S) = (b : R) • p :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_spec M p
⟨b,
Polynomial.ext fun i => by
rw [coeff_map, coeff_smul]
exact hb i⟩
variable {R' : Type*} [CommRing R']
theorem integerNormalization_eval₂_eq_zero (g : S →+* R') (p : S[X]) {x : R'}
(hx : eval₂ g x p = 0) : eval₂ (g.comp (algebraMap R S)) x (integerNormalization M p) = 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_map_to_map M p
_root_.trans (eval₂_map (algebraMap R S) g x).symm
(by rw [hb, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S (b : R) p, eval₂_smul, hx, mul_zero])
theorem integerNormalization_aeval_eq_zero [Algebra R R'] [Algebra S R'] [IsScalarTower R S R']
(p : S[X]) {x : R'} (hx : aeval x p = 0) : aeval x (integerNormalization M p) = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R S R',
integerNormalization_eval₂_eq_zero _ (algebraMap _ _) _ hx]
end IntegerNormalization
end IsLocalization
namespace IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
variable {A K C : Type*} [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [Field K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable [CommRing C]
theorem integerNormalization_eq_zero_iff {p : K[X]} :
integerNormalization (nonZeroDivisors A) p = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
refine Polynomial.ext_iff.trans (Polynomial.ext_iff.trans ?_).symm
obtain ⟨⟨b, nonzero⟩, hb⟩ := integerNormalization_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) p
constructor <;> intro h i
· -- Porting note: avoided some defeq abuse
rw [coeff_zero, ← to_map_eq_zero_iff (K := K), hb i, h i, coeff_zero, smul_zero]
· have hi := h i
rw [Polynomial.coeff_zero, ← @to_map_eq_zero_iff A _ K, hb i, Algebra.smul_def] at hi
apply Or.resolve_left (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero hi)
intro h
apply mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp nonzero
exact to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp h
variable (A K C)
/-- An element of a ring is algebraic over the ring `A` iff it is algebraic
over the field of fractions of `A`.
-/
theorem isAlgebraic_iff [Algebra A C] [Algebra K C] [IsScalarTower A K C] {x : C} :
IsAlgebraic A x ↔ IsAlgebraic K x := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨p, hp, px⟩
· refine ⟨p.map (algebraMap A K), fun h => hp (Polynomial.ext fun i => ?_), ?_⟩
· have : algebraMap A K (p.coeff i) = 0 :=
_root_.trans (Polynomial.coeff_map _ _).symm (by simp [h])
exact to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp this
· exact (Polynomial.aeval_map_algebraMap K _ _).trans px
· exact
⟨integerNormalization _ p, mt integerNormalization_eq_zero_iff.mp hp,
integerNormalization_aeval_eq_zero _ p px⟩
variable {A K C}
/-- A ring is algebraic over the ring `A` iff it is algebraic over the field of fractions of `A`.
-/
theorem comap_isAlgebraic_iff [Algebra A C] [Algebra K C] [IsScalarTower A K C] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic A C ↔ Algebra.IsAlgebraic K C :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun x => (isAlgebraic_iff A K C).mp (h.isAlgebraic x)⟩,
fun h => ⟨fun x => (isAlgebraic_iff A K C).mpr (h.isAlgebraic x)⟩⟩
end IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
section IsIntegral
variable {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ]
variable [Algebra R Rₘ] [IsLocalization M Rₘ]
variable [Algebra S Sₘ] [IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ]
variable {M}
open Polynomial
theorem RingHom.isIntegralElem_localization_at_leadingCoeff {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
[CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (p : R[X]) (hf : p.eval₂ f x = 0) (M : Submonoid R)
(hM : p.leadingCoeff ∈ M) {Rₘ Sₘ : Type*} [CommRing Rₘ] [CommRing Sₘ] [Algebra R Rₘ]
[IsLocalization M Rₘ] [Algebra S Sₘ] [IsLocalization (M.map f : Submonoid S) Sₘ] :
(map Sₘ f M.le_comap_map : Rₘ →+* _).IsIntegralElem (algebraMap S Sₘ x) := by
by_cases triv : (1 : Rₘ) = 0
· exact ⟨0, ⟨_root_.trans leadingCoeff_zero triv.symm, eval₂_zero _ _⟩⟩
haveI : Nontrivial Rₘ := nontrivial_of_ne 1 0 triv
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv.mp (map_units Rₘ ⟨p.leadingCoeff, hM⟩)
refine ⟨p.map (algebraMap R Rₘ) * C b, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one ?_
rwa [leadingCoeff_map_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (algebraMap R Rₘ)]
refine fun hfp => zero_ne_one
(_root_.trans (zero_mul b).symm (hfp ▸ hb) : (0 : Rₘ) = 1)
· refine eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left _ _ _ ?_
rw [eval₂_map, IsLocalization.map_comp, ← hom_eval₂ _ f (algebraMap S Sₘ) x]
exact _root_.trans (congr_arg (algebraMap S Sₘ) hf) (RingHom.map_zero _)
/-- Given a particular witness to an element being algebraic over an algebra `R → S`,
We can localize to a submonoid containing the leading coefficient to make it integral.
Explicitly, the map between the localizations will be an integral ring morphism -/
theorem is_integral_localization_at_leadingCoeff {x : S} (p : R[X]) (hp : aeval x p = 0)
(hM : p.leadingCoeff ∈ M) :
(map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :
Rₘ →+* _).IsIntegralElem
(algebraMap S Sₘ x) :=
-- Porting note: added `haveI`
haveI : IsLocalization (Submonoid.map (algebraMap R S) M) Sₘ :=
inferInstanceAs (IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) Sₘ)
(algebraMap R S).isIntegralElem_localization_at_leadingCoeff x p hp M hM
/-- If `R → S` is an integral extension, `M` is a submonoid of `R`,
`Rₘ` is the localization of `R` at `M`,
and `Sₘ` is the localization of `S` at the image of `M` under the extension map,
then the induced map `Rₘ → Sₘ` is also an integral extension -/
theorem isIntegral_localization [Algebra.IsIntegral R S] :
(map Sₘ (algebraMap R S)
(show _ ≤ (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M).comap _ from M.le_comap_map) :
Rₘ →+* _).IsIntegral := by
intro x
obtain ⟨⟨s, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩, hx⟩ := surj (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M) x
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hu
obtain ⟨v', hv'⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 (map_units Rₘ ⟨v, hv.1⟩)
refine @IsIntegral.of_mul_unit Rₘ _ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S) x (algebraMap S Sₘ u) v' ?_ ?_
· replace hv' := congr_arg (@algebraMap Rₘ Sₘ _ _ (localizationAlgebra M S)) hv'
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_one, localizationAlgebraMap_def, IsLocalization.map_eq]
at hv'
exact hv.2 ▸ hv'
· obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (R := R) s
exact hx.symm ▸ is_integral_localization_at_leadingCoeff p hp.2 (hp.1.symm ▸ M.one_mem)
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices] -- It claims the `have : IsLocalization` line is unnecessary,
-- but remove it and the proof won't work.
theorem isIntegral_localization' {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S}
(hf : f.IsIntegral) (M : Submonoid R) :
(map (Localization (M.map (f : R →* S))) f
(M.le_comap_map : _ ≤ Submonoid.comap (f : R →* S) _) :
Localization M →+* _).IsIntegral :=
-- Porting note: added
let _ := f.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsIntegral R S := ⟨hf⟩
have : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid S M)
(Localization (Submonoid.map (f : R →* S) M)) := Localization.isLocalization
isIntegral_localization
variable (M)
theorem IsLocalization.scaleRoots_commonDenom_mem_lifts (p : Rₘ[X])
(hp : p.leadingCoeff ∈ (algebraMap R Rₘ).range) :
p.scaleRoots (algebraMap R Rₘ <| IsLocalization.commonDenom M p.support p.coeff) ∈
Polynomial.lifts (algebraMap R Rₘ) := by
rw [Polynomial.lifts_iff_coeff_lifts]
intro n
rw [Polynomial.coeff_scaleRoots]
by_cases h₁ : n ∈ p.support
on_goal 1 => by_cases h₂ : n = p.natDegree
· rwa [h₂, Polynomial.coeff_natDegree, tsub_self, pow_zero, _root_.mul_one]
· have : n + 1 ≤ p.natDegree := lt_of_le_of_ne (Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ h₁) h₂
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_tsub_of_add_le_left this), pow_add, pow_one, mul_comm,
_root_.mul_assoc, ← map_pow]
change _ ∈ (algebraMap R Rₘ).range
apply mul_mem
· exact RingHom.mem_range_self _ _
· rw [← Algebra.smul_def]
exact ⟨_, IsLocalization.map_integerMultiple M p.support p.coeff ⟨n, h₁⟩⟩
· rw [Polynomial.not_mem_support_iff] at h₁
rw [h₁, zero_mul]
exact zero_mem (algebraMap R Rₘ).range
theorem IsIntegral.exists_multiple_integral_of_isLocalization [Algebra Rₘ S] [IsScalarTower R Rₘ S]
(x : S) (hx : IsIntegral Rₘ x) : ∃ m : M, IsIntegral R (m • x) := by
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial Rₘ with _ | nontriv
· haveI := (_root_.algebraMap Rₘ S).codomain_trivial
exact ⟨1, Polynomial.X, Polynomial.monic_X, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := hx
-- Porting note: obtain doesn't support side goals
have :=
lifts_and_natDegree_eq_and_monic (IsLocalization.scaleRoots_commonDenom_mem_lifts M p ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨p', hp'₁, -, hp'₂⟩ := this
refine ⟨IsLocalization.commonDenom M p.support p.coeff, p', hp'₂, ?_⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R Rₘ S, ← Polynomial.eval₂_map, hp'₁, Submonoid.smul_def,
Algebra.smul_def, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R Rₘ S]
exact Polynomial.scaleRoots_eval₂_eq_zero _ hp₂
· rw [hp₁.leadingCoeff]
exact one_mem _
· rwa [Polynomial.monic_scaleRoots_iff]
end IsIntegral
variable {A K : Type*} [CommRing A]
| namespace IsIntegralClosure
variable (A)
variable {L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra A K] [Algebra A L] [IsFractionRing A K]
variable (C : Type*) [CommRing C] [IsDomain C] [Algebra C L] [IsIntegralClosure C A L]
variable [Algebra A C] [IsScalarTower A C L]
open Algebra
/-- If the field `L` is an algebraic extension of the integral domain `A`,
the integral closure `C` of `A` in `L` has fraction field `L`. -/
theorem isFractionRing_of_algebraic [Algebra.IsAlgebraic A L]
(inj : ∀ x, algebraMap A L x = 0 → x = 0) : IsFractionRing C L :=
{ map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
IsUnit.mk0 _
(show algebraMap C L y ≠ 0 from fun h =>
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hy
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Integral.lean | 282 | 298 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| | pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 246 | 246 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Topological study of spaces `Π (n : ℕ), E n`
When `E n` are topological spaces, the space `Π (n : ℕ), E n` is naturally a topological space
(with the product topology). When `E n` are uniform spaces, it also inherits a uniform structure.
However, it does not inherit a canonical metric space structure of the `E n`. Nevertheless, one
can put a noncanonical metric space structure (or rather, several of them). This is done in this
file.
## Main definitions and results
One can define a combinatorial distance on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, as follows:
* `PiNat.cylinder x n` is the set of points `y` with `x i = y i` for `i < n`.
* `PiNat.firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x i ≠ y i`.
* `PiNat.dist x y` is equal to `(1/2) ^ (firstDiff x y)`. It defines a distance
on `Π (n : ℕ), E n`, compatible with the topology when the `E n` have the discrete topology.
* `PiNat.metricSpace`: the metric space structure, given by this distance. Not registered as an
instance. This space is a complete metric space.
* `PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity`: the same metric space structure, but adjusting the
uniformity defeqness when the `E n` already have the discrete uniformity. Not registered as an
instance
* `PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat`: the particular case of `ℕ → ℕ`, not registered as an instance.
These results are used to construct continuous functions on `Π n, E n`:
* `PiNat.exists_retraction_of_isClosed`: given a nonempty closed subset `s` of `Π (n : ℕ), E n`,
there exists a retraction onto `s`, i.e., a continuous map from the whole space to `s`
restricting to the identity on `s`.
* `exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective_of_completeSpace`: given any nonempty complete metric
space with second-countable topology, there exists a continuous surjection from `ℕ → ℕ` onto
this space.
One can also put distances on `Π (i : ι), E i` when the spaces `E i` are metric spaces (not discrete
in general), and `ι` is countable.
* `PiCountable.dist` is the distance on `Π i, E i` given by
`dist x y = ∑' i, min (1/2)^(encode i) (dist (x i) (y i))`.
* `PiCountable.metricSpace` is the corresponding metric space structure, adjusted so that
the uniformity is definitionally the product uniformity. Not registered as an instance.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ one_lt_two inv_le_inv₀ zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
/-! ### The firstDiff function -/
open Classical in
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, then `firstDiff x y` is the first index at which `x` and `y`
differ. If `x = y`, then by convention we set `firstDiff x x = 0`. -/
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
classical
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
classical
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
/-! ### Cylinders -/
/-- In a product space `Π n, E n`, the cylinder set of length `n` around `x`, denoted
`cylinder x n`, is the set of sequences `y` that coincide with `x` on the first `n` symbols, i.e.,
such that `y i = x i` for all `i < n`.
-/
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_eq {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ cylinder y n = cylinder x n := by
constructor
· intro hy
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz i hi
rw [← hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro z hz i hi
rw [hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact self_mem_cylinder _ _
theorem mem_cylinder_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ x ∈ cylinder y n := by
simp [mem_cylinder_iff_eq, eq_comm]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} (hne : x ≠ y) (i : ℕ) :
x ∈ cylinder y i ↔ i ≤ firstDiff x y := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra!
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (h _ this)
· intro hi j hj
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hj.trans_le hi)
theorem mem_cylinder_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : x ∈ cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := fun _i hi =>
apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff hi
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ firstDiff x y) :
cylinder x n = cylinder y n := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
intro i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le hn)
theorem iUnion_cylinder_update (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
⋃ k, cylinder (update x n k) (n + 1) = cylinder x n := by
ext y
simp only [mem_cylinder_iff, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ i hi
simpa [hi.ne] using hk i (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
refine ⟨y n, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rcases Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi with (h'i | rfl)
· simp [H i h'i, h'i.ne]
· simp
theorem update_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) (y : E n) : update x n y ∈ cylinder x n :=
mem_cylinder_iff.2 fun i hi => by simp [hi.ne]
section Res
variable {α : Type*}
open List
/-- In the case where `E` has constant value `α`,
the cylinder `cylinder x n` can be identified with the element of `List α`
consisting of the first `n` entries of `x`. See `cylinder_eq_res`.
We call this list `res x n`, the restriction of `x` to `n`. -/
def res (x : ℕ → α) : ℕ → List α
| 0 => nil
| Nat.succ n => x n :: res x n
@[simp]
theorem res_zero (x : ℕ → α) : res x 0 = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem res_succ (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : res x n.succ = x n :: res x n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem res_length (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : (res x n).length = n := by induction n <;> simp [*]
/-- The restrictions of `x` and `y` to `n` are equal if and only if `x m = y m` for all `m < n`. -/
theorem res_eq_res {x y : ℕ → α} {n : ℕ} :
res x n = res y n ↔ ∀ ⦃m⦄, m < n → x m = y m := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
intro m hm
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq] at h
rcases hm with hm | hm
· exact ih h.2 hm
rw [hm]
exact h.1
· induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨h (Nat.lt_succ_self _), ih fun m hm => ?_⟩
exact h (hm.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
theorem res_injective : Injective (@res α) := by
intro x y h
ext n
apply res_eq_res.mp _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
rw [h]
/-- `cylinder x n` is equal to the set of sequences `y` with the same restriction to `n` as `x`. -/
theorem cylinder_eq_res (x : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = { y | res y n = res x n } := by
ext y
dsimp [cylinder]
rw [res_eq_res]
end Res
/-!
### A distance function on `Π n, E n`
We define a distance function on `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is the first
index at which `x` and `y` differ. When each `E n` has the discrete topology, this distance will
define the right topology on the product space. We do not record a global `Dist` instance nor
a `MetricSpace` instance, as other distances may be used on these spaces, but we register them as
local instances in this section.
-/
open Classical in
/-- The distance function on a product space `Π n, E n`, given by `dist x y = (1/2)^n` where `n` is
the first index at which `x` and `y` differ. -/
protected def dist : Dist (∀ n, E n) :=
⟨fun x y => if x ≠ y then (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y else 0⟩
attribute [local instance] PiNat.dist
theorem dist_eq_of_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) : dist x y = (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y := by
simp [dist, h]
protected theorem dist_self (x : ∀ n, E n) : dist x x = 0 := by simp [dist]
protected theorem dist_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : dist x y = dist y x := by
classical
simp [dist, @eq_comm _ x y, firstDiff_comm]
protected theorem dist_nonneg (x y : ∀ n, E n) : 0 ≤ dist x y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp [dist]
· simp [dist, h, zero_le_two]
theorem dist_triangle_nonarch (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x z with (rfl | hxz)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self x, PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y z with (rfl | hyz)
· simp
simp only [dist_eq_of_ne, hxz, hxy, hyz, inv_le_inv₀, one_div, inv_pow, zero_lt_two, Ne,
not_false_iff, le_max_iff, pow_le_pow_iff_right₀, one_lt_two, pow_pos,
min_le_iff.1 (min_firstDiff_le x y z hxz)]
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
calc
dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := dist_triangle_nonarch x y z
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z := max_le_add_of_nonneg (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _) (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _)
protected theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero (x y : ∀ n, E n) (hxy : dist x y = 0) : x = y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h); · rfl
simp [dist_eq_of_ne h] at hxy
| theorem mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ dist y x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 285 | 288 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
/-!
# Ergodic maps and measures
Let `f : α → α` be measure preserving with respect to a measure `μ`. We say `f` is ergodic with
respect to `μ` (or `μ` is ergodic with respect to `f`) if the only measurable sets `s` such that
`f⁻¹' s = s` are either almost empty or full.
In this file we define ergodic maps / measures together with quasi-ergodic maps / measures and
provide some basic API. Quasi-ergodicity is a weaker condition than ergodicity for which the measure
preserving condition is relaxed to quasi measure preserving.
# Main definitions:
* `PreErgodic`: the ergodicity condition without the measure preserving condition. This exists
to share code between the `Ergodic` and `QuasiErgodic` definitions.
* `Ergodic`: the definition of ergodic maps / measures.
* `QuasiErgodic`: the definition of quasi ergodic maps / measures.
* `Ergodic.quasiErgodic`: an ergodic map / measure is quasi ergodic.
* `QuasiErgodic.ae_empty_or_univ'`: when the map is quasi measure preserving, one may relax the
strict invariance condition to almost invariance in the ergodicity condition.
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α}
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be pre-ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if any measurable
strictly invariant set is either almost empty or full. -/
structure PreErgodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop where
aeconst_set ⦃s : Set α⦄ : MeasurableSet s → f ⁻¹' s = s → EventuallyConst s (ae μ)
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if it is measure
preserving and pre-ergodic. -/
structure Ergodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop extends
MeasurePreserving f μ μ, PreErgodic f μ
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be quasi ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if it is quasi
measure preserving and pre-ergodic. -/
structure QuasiErgodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop extends
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ, PreErgodic f μ
variable {f : α → α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace PreErgodic
theorem ae_empty_or_univ (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hfs : f ⁻¹' s = s) :
s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ∨ s =ᵐ[μ] univ := by
simpa only [eventuallyConst_set'] using hf.aeconst_set hs hfs
theorem measure_self_or_compl_eq_zero (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hs' : f ⁻¹' s = s) : μ s = 0 ∨ μ sᶜ = 0 := by
simpa using hf.ae_empty_or_univ hs hs'
theorem ae_mem_or_ae_nmem (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : f ⁻¹' s = s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) ∨ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyConst_set.1 <| hf.aeconst_set hsm hs
/-- On a probability space, the (pre)ergodicity condition is a zero one law. -/
theorem prob_eq_zero_or_one [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hs' : f ⁻¹' s = s) : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = 1 := by
simpa [hs] using hf.measure_self_or_compl_eq_zero hs hs'
theorem of_iterate (n : ℕ) (hf : PreErgodic f^[n] μ) : PreErgodic f μ :=
⟨fun _ hs hs' => hf.aeconst_set hs <| IsFixedPt.preimage_iterate hs' n⟩
theorem smul_measure {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(hf : PreErgodic f μ) (c : R) : PreErgodic f (c • μ) where
aeconst_set _s hs hfs := (hf.aeconst_set hs hfs).anti <| ae_smul_measure_le _
theorem zero_measure (f : α → α) : @PreErgodic α m f 0 where
aeconst_set _ _ _ := by simp
end PreErgodic
namespace MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving
variable {β : Type*} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {μ' : Measure β} {g : α → β}
theorem preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ μ') (hf : PreErgodic f μ)
{f' : β → β} (h_comm : Semiconj g f f') : PreErgodic f' μ' where
aeconst_set s hs₀ hs₁ := by
rw [← hg.aeconst_preimage hs₀.nullMeasurableSet]
apply hf.aeconst_set (hg.measurable hs₀)
rw [← preimage_comp, h_comm.comp_eq, preimage_comp, hs₁]
theorem preErgodic_conjugate_iff {e : α ≃ᵐ β} (h : MeasurePreserving e μ μ') :
| PreErgodic (e ∘ f ∘ e.symm) μ' ↔ PreErgodic f μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf => preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate (h.symm e) hf ?_,
fun hf => preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate h hf ?_⟩
· simp [Semiconj]
· simp [Semiconj]
theorem ergodic_conjugate_iff {e : α ≃ᵐ β} (h : MeasurePreserving e μ μ') :
Ergodic (e ∘ f ∘ e.symm) μ' ↔ Ergodic f μ := by
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Ergodic/Ergodic.lean | 99 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Finite
/-!
# Factorization of ideals and fractional ideals of Dedekind domains
Every nonzero ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product `∏_v v^{n_v}` over the
maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are natural numbers.
Similarly, every nonzero fractional ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product
`∏_v v^{n_v}` over the maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are integers. We define
`FractionalIdeal.count K v I` (abbreviated as `val_v(I)` in the documentation) to be `n_v`, and we
prove some of its properties. If `I = 0`, we define `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main definitions
- `FractionalIdeal.count` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of
`R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we
set `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main results
- `Ideal.finite_factors` : Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal.
- `Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : The ideal `I` equals the finprod
`∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, where `val_v(I)` denotes the multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`
and `v` runs over the maximal ideals of `R`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal,
`a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization'` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional
ideal, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal` : For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`,
the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finite_factors` : If `I ≠ 0`, then `val_v(I) = 0` for all but finitely many
maximal ideals of `R`.
## Implementation notes
Since we are only interested in the factorization of nonzero fractional ideals, we define
`val_v(0) = 0` so that every `val_v` is in `ℤ` and we can avoid having to use `WithTop ℤ`.
## Tags
dedekind domain, fractional ideal, ideal, factorization
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-! ### Factorization of ideals of Dedekind domains -/
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a maximal ideal `v` and an ideal `I` of `R`, `maxPowDividing` returns the maximal
power of `v` dividing `I`. -/
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
/-- Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal. -/
theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw)
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that the
multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`, denoted `val_v(I)`, is nonzero. -/
theorem Associates.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite,
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0 := by
have h_supp : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | ¬((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0} = {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I} := by
ext v
simp_rw [Int.natCast_eq_zero]
exact Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd hI v.irreducible
rw [Filter.eventually_cofinite, h_supp]
exact Ideal.finite_factors hI
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => v.maxPowDividing I).Finite :=
haveI h_subset : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 1} ⊆
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R |
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) ≠ 0} := by
intro v hv h_zero
have hv' : v.maxPowDividing I = 1 := by
rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, Int.natCast_eq_zero.mp h_zero,
pow_zero _]
exact hv hv'
Finite.subset (Filter.eventually_cofinite.mp (Associates.finite_factors hI)) h_subset
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))`, regarded as a fractional ideal, is not `(1)`. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [Ne, zpow_natCast, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^-(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_inv {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
(-((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ))).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [zpow_neg, Ne, inv_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport_coe hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, `v^(val_v(I) + 1)` does not divide `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_not_dvd (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) :
¬v.asIdeal ^ ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors + 1) ∣
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I := by
have hf := finite_mulSupport hI
have h_ne_zero : v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
rw [← mul_finprod_cond_ne v hf, pow_add, pow_one, finprod_cond_ne _ _ hf]
intro h_contr
have hv_prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw'⟩ :=
Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd hv_prime ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h_ne_zero).mp h_contr)
have hw_prime : Prime w.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime w.ne_bot w.isPrime
have hvw := Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow hv_prime hvw'
rw [Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated hv_prime hw_prime, associated_iff_eq] at hvw
exact (Finset.mem_erase.mp hw).1 (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw.symm)
end Ideal
theorem Associates.finprod_ne_zero (I : Ideal R) :
Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I) ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, finprod_def]
split_ifs
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro v _
apply pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
· exact one_ne_zero
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of `v` in `∏_v v^(val_v(I))` equals `val_v(I)`. -/
theorem finprod_count (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) : (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
| (Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I)).factors =
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors := by
have h_ne_zero := Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := v.associates_irreducible
have h_dvd := finprod_mem_dvd v (Ideal.finite_mulSupport hI)
have h_not_dvd := Ideal.finprod_not_dvd v I hI
simp only [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing] at h_dvd h_ne_zero h_not_dvd
rw [← Associates.mk_dvd_mk] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [Associates.mk_pow, Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h_ne_zero hv] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [not_le] at h_not_dvd
apply Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ h_dvd h_not_dvd
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 162 | 174 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Block matrices and their determinant
This file defines a predicate `Matrix.BlockTriangular` saying a matrix
is block triangular, and proves the value of the determinant for various
matrices built out of blocks.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.BlockTriangular` expresses that an `o` by `o` matrix is block triangular,
if the rows and columns are ordered according to some order `b : o → α`
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_of_blockTriangular`: the determinant of a block triangular matrix
is equal to the product of the determinants of all the blocks
* `Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular` and `Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`: the determinant of
a triangular matrix is the product of the entries along the diagonal
## Tags
matrix, diagonal, det, block triangular
-/
open Finset Function OrderDual
open Matrix
universe v
variable {α β m n o : Type*} {m' n' : α → Type*}
variable {R : Type v} {M N : Matrix m m R} {b : m → α}
namespace Matrix
section LT
variable [LT α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `α`s. Then
`BlockTriangular M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def BlockTriangular (M : Matrix m m R) (b : m → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j⦄, b j < b i → M i j = 0
@[simp]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.submatrix {f : n → m} (h : M.BlockTriangular b) :
(M.submatrix f f).BlockTriangular (b ∘ f) := fun _ _ hij => h hij
theorem blockTriangular_reindex_iff {b : n → α} {e : m ≃ n} :
(reindex e e M).BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (b ∘ e) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [reindex_apply, submatrix_submatrix, submatrix_id_id, Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [comp_assoc b e e.symm, Equiv.self_comp_symm, comp_id]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.transpose :
M.BlockTriangular b → Mᵀ.BlockTriangular (toDual ∘ b) :=
swap
@[simp]
protected theorem blockTriangular_transpose_iff {b : m → αᵒᵈ} :
Mᵀ.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (ofDual ∘ b) :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem blockTriangular_zero : BlockTriangular (0 : Matrix m m R) b := fun _ _ _ => rfl
end Zero
protected theorem BlockTriangular.neg [NegZeroClass R] {M : Matrix m m R}
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (-M) b :=
fun _ _ h => by rw [neg_apply, hM h, neg_zero]
theorem BlockTriangular.add [AddZeroClass R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.add_apply, hM h, hN h, zero_add]
theorem BlockTriangular.sub [SubNegZeroMonoid R]
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.sub_apply, hM h, hN h, sub_zero]
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using hM.neg.add ·), hM.add⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.sub hN), (·.add hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.neg.add hM), hM.sub⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.add hN), (·.sub hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.map {S F} [FunLike F R S] [Zero R] [Zero S] [ZeroHomClass F R S] (f : F)
| (h : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (M.map f) b :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
lemma BlockTriangular.comp [Zero R] {M : Matrix m m (Matrix n n R)} (h : BlockTriangular M b) :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Block.lean | 109 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
/-!
# Ergodic maps and measures
Let `f : α → α` be measure preserving with respect to a measure `μ`. We say `f` is ergodic with
respect to `μ` (or `μ` is ergodic with respect to `f`) if the only measurable sets `s` such that
`f⁻¹' s = s` are either almost empty or full.
In this file we define ergodic maps / measures together with quasi-ergodic maps / measures and
provide some basic API. Quasi-ergodicity is a weaker condition than ergodicity for which the measure
preserving condition is relaxed to quasi measure preserving.
# Main definitions:
* `PreErgodic`: the ergodicity condition without the measure preserving condition. This exists
to share code between the `Ergodic` and `QuasiErgodic` definitions.
* `Ergodic`: the definition of ergodic maps / measures.
* `QuasiErgodic`: the definition of quasi ergodic maps / measures.
* `Ergodic.quasiErgodic`: an ergodic map / measure is quasi ergodic.
* `QuasiErgodic.ae_empty_or_univ'`: when the map is quasi measure preserving, one may relax the
strict invariance condition to almost invariance in the ergodicity condition.
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {s : Set α}
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be pre-ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if any measurable
strictly invariant set is either almost empty or full. -/
structure PreErgodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop where
aeconst_set ⦃s : Set α⦄ : MeasurableSet s → f ⁻¹' s = s → EventuallyConst s (ae μ)
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if it is measure
preserving and pre-ergodic. -/
structure Ergodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop extends
MeasurePreserving f μ μ, PreErgodic f μ
/-- A map `f : α → α` is said to be quasi ergodic with respect to a measure `μ` if it is quasi
measure preserving and pre-ergodic. -/
structure QuasiErgodic (f : α → α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop extends
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ, PreErgodic f μ
variable {f : α → α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace PreErgodic
theorem ae_empty_or_univ (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hfs : f ⁻¹' s = s) :
s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ∨ s =ᵐ[μ] univ := by
simpa only [eventuallyConst_set'] using hf.aeconst_set hs hfs
theorem measure_self_or_compl_eq_zero (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hs' : f ⁻¹' s = s) : μ s = 0 ∨ μ sᶜ = 0 := by
simpa using hf.ae_empty_or_univ hs hs'
theorem ae_mem_or_ae_nmem (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : f ⁻¹' s = s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) ∨ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyConst_set.1 <| hf.aeconst_set hsm hs
/-- On a probability space, the (pre)ergodicity condition is a zero one law. -/
theorem prob_eq_zero_or_one [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hf : PreErgodic f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hs' : f ⁻¹' s = s) : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = 1 := by
simpa [hs] using hf.measure_self_or_compl_eq_zero hs hs'
theorem of_iterate (n : ℕ) (hf : PreErgodic f^[n] μ) : PreErgodic f μ :=
⟨fun _ hs hs' => hf.aeconst_set hs <| IsFixedPt.preimage_iterate hs' n⟩
theorem smul_measure {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(hf : PreErgodic f μ) (c : R) : PreErgodic f (c • μ) where
aeconst_set _s hs hfs := (hf.aeconst_set hs hfs).anti <| ae_smul_measure_le _
theorem zero_measure (f : α → α) : @PreErgodic α m f 0 where
aeconst_set _ _ _ := by simp
end PreErgodic
namespace MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving
| variable {β : Type*} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {μ' : Measure β} {g : α → β}
theorem preErgodic_of_preErgodic_conjugate (hg : MeasurePreserving g μ μ') (hf : PreErgodic f μ)
{f' : β → β} (h_comm : Semiconj g f f') : PreErgodic f' μ' where
aeconst_set s hs₀ hs₁ := by
rw [← hg.aeconst_preimage hs₀.nullMeasurableSet]
apply hf.aeconst_set (hg.measurable hs₀)
rw [← preimage_comp, h_comm.comp_eq, preimage_comp, hs₁]
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Ergodic/Ergodic.lean | 89 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.QuadraticReciprocity
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Basic
/-!
# Sums of two squares
Fermat's theorem on the sum of two squares. Every prime `p` congruent to 1 mod 4 is the
sum of two squares; see `Nat.Prime.sq_add_sq` (which has the weaker assumption `p % 4 ≠ 3`).
We also give the result that characterizes the (positive) natural numbers that are sums
of two squares as those numbers `n` such that for every prime `q` congruent to 3 mod 4, the
exponent of the largest power of `q` dividing `n` is even; see `Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_iff`.
There is an alternative characterization as the numbers of the form `a^2 * b`, where `b` is a
natural number such that `-1` is a square modulo `b`; see `Nat.eq_sq_add_sq_iff_eq_sq_mul`.
-/
section Fermat
open GaussianInt
/-- **Fermat's theorem on the sum of two squares**. Every prime not congruent to 3 mod 4 is the sum
of two squares. Also known as **Fermat's Christmas theorem**. -/
theorem Nat.Prime.sq_add_sq {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hp : p % 4 ≠ 3) :
∃ a b : ℕ, a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 = p := by
apply sq_add_sq_of_nat_prime_of_not_irreducible p
rwa [_root_.irreducible_iff_prime, prime_iff_mod_four_eq_three_of_nat_prime p]
end Fermat
/-!
### Generalities on sums of two squares
-/
section General
/-- The set of sums of two squares is closed under multiplication in any commutative ring.
See also `sq_add_sq_mul_sq_add_sq`. -/
theorem sq_add_sq_mul {R} [CommRing R] {a b x y u v : R} (ha : a = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2)
(hb : b = u ^ 2 + v ^ 2) : ∃ r s : R, a * b = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2 :=
⟨x * u - y * v, x * v + y * u, by rw [ha, hb]; ring⟩
/-- The set of natural numbers that are sums of two squares is closed under multiplication. -/
theorem Nat.sq_add_sq_mul {a b x y u v : ℕ} (ha : a = x ^ 2 + y ^ 2) (hb : b = u ^ 2 + v ^ 2) :
∃ r s : ℕ, a * b = r ^ 2 + s ^ 2 := by
zify at ha hb ⊢
obtain ⟨r, s, h⟩ := _root_.sq_add_sq_mul ha hb
| refine ⟨r.natAbs, s.natAbs, ?_⟩
simpa only [Int.natCast_natAbs, sq_abs]
end General
/-!
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SumTwoSquares.lean | 56 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Fangming Li
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
/-!
# Series of a relation
If `r` is a relation on `α` then a relation series of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
variable {α : Type*} (r : Rel α α)
variable {β : Type*} (s : Rel β β)
/--
Let `r` be a relation on `α`, a relation series of `r` of length `n` is a series
`a_0, a_1, ..., a_n` such that `r a_i a_{i+1}` for all `i < n`
-/
structure RelSeries where
/-- The number of inequalities in the series -/
length : ℕ
/-- The underlying function of a relation series -/
toFun : Fin (length + 1) → α
/-- Adjacent elements are related -/
step : ∀ (i : Fin length), r (toFun (Fin.castSucc i)) (toFun i.succ)
namespace RelSeries
instance : CoeFun (RelSeries r) (fun x ↦ Fin (x.length + 1) → α) :=
{ coe := RelSeries.toFun }
/--
For any type `α`, each term of `α` gives a relation series with the right most index to be 0.
-/
@[simps!] def singleton (a : α) : RelSeries r where
length := 0
toFun _ := a
step := Fin.elim0
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (RelSeries r) where
false x := IsEmpty.false (x 0)
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (RelSeries r) where
default := singleton r default
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (RelSeries r) :=
Nonempty.map (singleton r) inferInstance
variable {r}
@[ext (iff := false)]
lemma ext {x y : RelSeries r} (length_eq : x.length = y.length)
(toFun_eq : x.toFun = y.toFun ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [length_eq])) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨nx, fx⟩
dsimp only at length_eq toFun_eq
subst length_eq toFun_eq
rfl
lemma rel_of_lt [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i < j) :
r (x i) (x j) :=
(Fin.liftFun_iff_succ r).mpr x.step h
lemma rel_or_eq_of_le [IsTrans α r] (x : RelSeries r) {i j : Fin (x.length + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) :
r (x i) (x j) ∨ x i = x j :=
(Fin.lt_or_eq_of_le h).imp (x.rel_of_lt ·) (by rw [·])
/--
Given two relations `r, s` on `α` such that `r ≤ s`, any relation series of `r` induces a relation
series of `s`
-/
@[simps!]
def ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) : RelSeries s where
length := x.length
toFun := x
step _ := h _ _ <| x.step _
lemma coe_ofLE (x : RelSeries r) {s : Rel α α} (h : r ≤ s) :
(x.ofLE h : _ → _) = x := rfl
/-- Every relation series gives a list -/
def toList (x : RelSeries r) : List α := List.ofFn x
@[simp]
lemma length_toList (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.length = x.length + 1 :=
List.length_ofFn
lemma toList_chain' (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList.Chain' r := by
rw [List.chain'_iff_get]
intros i h
convert x.step ⟨i, by simpa [toList] using h⟩ <;> apply List.get_ofFn
lemma toList_ne_nil (x : RelSeries r) : x.toList ≠ [] := fun m =>
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mp m (x 0) <| List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
/-- Every nonempty list satisfying the chain condition gives a relation series -/
@[simps]
def fromListChain' (x : List α) (x_ne_nil : x ≠ []) (hx : x.Chain' r) : RelSeries r where
length := x.length - 1
toFun i := x[Fin.cast (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x_ne_nil) i]
step i := List.chain'_iff_get.mp hx i i.2
/-- Relation series of `r` and nonempty list of `α` satisfying `r`-chain condition bijectively
corresponds to each other. -/
protected def Equiv : RelSeries r ≃ {x : List α | x ≠ [] ∧ x.Chain' r} where
toFun x := ⟨_, x.toList_ne_nil, x.toList_chain'⟩
invFun x := fromListChain' _ x.2.1 x.2.2
left_inv x := ext (by simp [toList]) <| by ext; dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn
right_inv x := by
refine Subtype.ext (List.ext_get ?_ fun n hn1 _ => by dsimp; apply List.get_ofFn)
have := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| List.length_pos_iff.mpr x.2.1
simp_all [toList]
lemma toList_injective : Function.Injective (RelSeries.toList (r := r)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (RelSeries.Equiv).injective <| Subtype.ext h
-- TODO : build a similar bijection between `RelSeries α` and `Quiver.Path`
end RelSeries
namespace Rel
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class FiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be finite dimensional iff there is a relation series of `r` with the
maximum length. -/
exists_longest_relSeries : ∃ x : RelSeries r, ∀ y : RelSeries r, y.length ≤ x.length
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of arbitrary
length. -/
@[mk_iff]
class InfiniteDimensional : Prop where
/-- A relation `r` is said to be infinite dimensional iff there exists relation series of
arbitrary length. -/
exists_relSeries_with_length : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ x : RelSeries r, x.length = n
end Rel
namespace RelSeries
/-- The longest relational series when a relation is finite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] : RelSeries r :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose
lemma length_le_length_longestOf [r.FiniteDimensional] (x : RelSeries r) :
x.length ≤ (RelSeries.longestOf r).length :=
Rel.FiniteDimensional.exists_longest_relSeries.choose_spec _
/-- A relation series with length `n` if the relation is infinite dimensional -/
protected noncomputable def withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) : RelSeries r :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose
@[simp] lemma length_withLength [r.InfiniteDimensional] (n : ℕ) :
(RelSeries.withLength r n).length = n :=
(Rel.InfiniteDimensional.exists_relSeries_with_length n).choose_spec
section
variable {r} {s : RelSeries r} {x : α}
/-- If a relation on `α` is infinite dimensional, then `α` is nonempty. -/
lemma nonempty_of_infiniteDimensional [r.InfiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α :=
⟨RelSeries.withLength r 0 0⟩
lemma nonempty_of_finiteDimensional [r.FiniteDimensional] : Nonempty α := by
obtain ⟨p, _⟩ := (Rel.finiteDimensional_iff r).mp ‹_›
exact ⟨p 0⟩
instance membership : Membership α (RelSeries r) :=
⟨Function.swap (· ∈ Set.range ·)⟩
theorem mem_def : x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ Set.range s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_toList : x ∈ s.toList ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [RelSeries.toList, List.mem_ofFn', RelSeries.mem_def]
theorem subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero (hs : s.length = 0) : {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩ - ⟨j, rfl⟩
congr!
exact finCongr (by rw [hs, zero_add]) |>.injective <| Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) _ _
theorem length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : s.length ≠ 0 :=
fun hs ↦ h.not_subsingleton <| subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs
theorem length_pos_of_nontrivial (h : {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial) : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial h
theorem length_ne_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length ≠ 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨s 0, by simp [mem_def], s 1, by simp [mem_def], fun rid ↦ irrefl (s 0) ?_⟩,
length_ne_zero_of_nontrivial⟩
nth_rw 2 [rid]
convert s.step ⟨0, by omega⟩
ext
simpa [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem length_pos (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : 0 < s.length ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Nontrivial :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| length_ne_zero irrefl
lemma length_eq_zero (irrefl : Irreflexive r) : s.length = 0 ↔ {x | x ∈ s}.Subsingleton := by
rw [← not_ne_iff, length_ne_zero irrefl, Set.not_nontrivial_iff]
/-- Start of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its head is `a₀`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def head (x : RelSeries r) : α := x 0
/-- End of a series, i.e. for `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`, its last element is `aₙ`.
Since a relation series is assumed to be non-empty, this is well defined. -/
def last (x : RelSeries r) : α := x <| Fin.last _
lemma apply_last (x : RelSeries r) : x (Fin.last <| x.length) = x.last := rfl
lemma head_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.head ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
lemma last_mem (x : RelSeries r) : x.last ∈ x := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma head_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).head = x := by simp [singleton, head]
@[simp]
lemma last_singleton {r : Rel α α} (x : α) : (singleton r x).last = x := by simp [singleton, last]
end
variable {r s}
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and `b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ` are two strict series
such that `r aₙ b₀`, then there is a chain of length `n + m + 1` given by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ b₀ -r→ b₁ -r→ ... -r→ bₘ`.
-/
@[simps length]
def append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + q.length + 1
toFun := Fin.append p q ∘ Fin.cast (by omega)
step i := by
obtain hi | rfl | hi :=
lt_trichotomy i (Fin.castLE (by omega) (Fin.last _ : Fin (p.length + 1)))
· convert p.step ⟨i.1, hi⟩ <;> convert Fin.append_left p q _ <;> rfl
· convert connect
· convert Fin.append_left p q _
· convert Fin.append_right p q _; rfl
· set x := _; set y := _
change r (Fin.append p q x) (Fin.append p q y)
have hx : x = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <|
i.2.trans <| by omega⟩ := by
ext; dsimp [x, y]; rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel']; exact hi
have hy : y = Fin.natAdd _ ⟨i - p.length, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add (le_of_lt hi)
(by exact i.2)⟩ := by
ext
dsimp
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm p.length 1, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel' <| le_of_lt (show p.length < i.1 from hi), add_comm]
rfl
rw [hx, Fin.append_right, hy, Fin.append_right]
convert q.step ⟨i - (p.length + 1), Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hi <| by omega⟩
rw [Fin.succ_mk, Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (le_of_lt hi : p.length ≤ i),
Nat.add_assoc _ 1, add_comm 1, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
exact hi
lemma append_apply_left (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect ((i.castAdd (q.length + 1)).cast (by dsimp; omega)) = p i := by
delta append
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_left _ _ _
lemma append_apply_right (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head)
(i : Fin (q.length + 1)) :
p.append q connect (i.natAdd p.length + 1) = q i := by
delta append
simp only [Fin.coe_natAdd, Nat.cast_add, Function.comp_apply]
convert Fin.append_right _ _ _
ext
simp only [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_natAdd]
conv_rhs => rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, ← add_assoc]
change _ % _ = _
simp only [Nat.add_mod_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_succ_eq_iff_lt]
omega
@[simp] lemma head_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).head = p.head :=
append_apply_left p q connect 0
@[simp] lemma last_append (p q : RelSeries r) (connect : r p.last q.head) :
(p.append q connect).last = q.last := by
delta last
convert append_apply_right p q connect (Fin.last _)
ext
change _ = _ % _
simp only [append_length, Fin.val_last, Fin.natAdd_last, Nat.one_mod, Nat.mod_add_mod,
Nat.mod_succ]
/--
For two types `α, β` and relation on them `r, s`, if `f : α → β` preserves relation `r`, then an
`r`-series can be pushed out to an `s`-series by
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ ↦ f a₀ -s→ f a₁ -s→ ... -s→ f aₙ`
-/
@[simps length]
def map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : RelSeries s where
length := p.length
toFun := f.1.comp p
step := (f.2 <| p.step ·)
@[simp] lemma map_apply (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.map f i = f (p i) := rfl
@[simp] lemma head_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).head = f p.head := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_map (p : RelSeries r) (f : r →r s) : (p.map f).last = f p.last := rfl
/--
If `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` is an `r`-series and `a` is such that
`aᵢ -r→ a -r→ a_ᵢ₊₁`, then
`a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aᵢ -r→ a -r→ aᵢ₊₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`
is another `r`-series
-/
@[simps]
def insertNth (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin p.length) (a : α)
(prev_connect : r (p (Fin.castSucc i)) a) (connect_next : r a (p i.succ)) : RelSeries r where
length := p.length + 1
toFun := (Fin.castSucc i.succ).insertNth a p
step m := by
set x := _; set y := _; change r x y
obtain hm | hm | hm := lt_trichotomy m.1 i.1
· convert p.step ⟨m, hm.trans i.2⟩
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp
· show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· change m.1 + 1 < i.1 + 1; rwa [add_lt_add_iff_right]
simp; rfl
· rw [show x = p m from show Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _ by
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_below]
pick_goal 2
· show m.1 < i.1 + 1; exact hm ▸ lt_add_one _
simp]
convert prev_connect
· ext; exact hm
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.succ = i.succ.castSucc by ext; change _ + 1 = _ + 1; rw [hm],
Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hm
obtain hm | hm := hm
· convert p.step ⟨m.1 - 1, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add (by omega) m.2⟩
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above (h := hm)]
aesop
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· exact hm.trans (lt_add_one _)
simp only [Fin.val_succ, Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant, Fin.succ_mk]
congr
exact Fin.ext <| Eq.symm <| Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (lt_trans (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) hm)
· convert connect_next
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [show m.castSucc = i.succ.castSucc from Fin.ext hm.symm, Fin.insertNth_apply_same]
· change Fin.insertNth _ _ _ _ = _
rw [Fin.insertNth_apply_above]
swap
· change i.1 + 1 < m.1 + 1; omega
simp only [Fin.pred_succ, eq_rec_constant]
congr; ext; exact hm.symm
/--
A relation series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` of `r` gives a relation series of the reverse of `r`
by reversing the series `aₙ ←r- aₙ₋₁ ←r- ... ←r- a₁ ←r- a₀`.
-/
@[simps length]
def reverse (p : RelSeries r) : RelSeries (fun (a b : α) ↦ r b a) where
length := p.length
toFun := p ∘ Fin.rev
step i := by
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply]
have hi : i.1 + 1 ≤ p.length := by omega
convert p.step ⟨p.length - (i.1 + 1), Nat.sub_lt_self (by omega) hi⟩
· ext; simp
· ext
simp only [Fin.val_rev, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_succ]
omega
@[simp] lemma reverse_apply (p : RelSeries r) (i : Fin (p.length + 1)) :
p.reverse i = p i.rev := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.last = p.head := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma head_reverse (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.head = p.last := by
simp [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head]
@[simp] lemma reverse_reverse {r : Rel α α} (p : RelSeries r) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
ext <;> simp
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `a₀ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a -r→ a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) : RelSeries r :=
(singleton r newHead).append p rel
@[simp] lemma head_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).head = newHead := rfl
@[simp] lemma last_cons (p : RelSeries r) (newHead : α) (rel : r newHead p.head) :
(p.cons newHead rel).last = p.last := by
delta cons
rw [last_append]
lemma cons_cast_succ (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r a s.head) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
(s.cons a h) (.cast (by simp) (.succ i)) = s i := by
dsimp [cons]
convert append_apply_right (singleton r a) s h i
ext
show i.1 + 1 = _ % _
simpa using (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by simp)).symm
/--
Given a series `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ` and an `a` such that `aₙ -r→ a` holds, there is
a series of length `n+1`: `a₀ -r→ a₁ -r→ ... -r→ aₙ -r→ a`.
-/
@[simps! length]
def snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) : RelSeries r :=
p.append (singleton r newLast) rel
@[simp] lemma head_snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
(p.snoc newLast rel).head = p.head := by
delta snoc; rw [head_append]
@[simp] lemma last_snoc (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
(p.snoc newLast rel).last = newLast := last_append _ _ _
lemma snoc_cast_castSucc (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (h : r s.last a) (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) :
(s.snoc a h) (.cast (by simp) (.castSucc i)) = s i :=
append_apply_left s (singleton r a) h i
-- This lemma is useful because `last_snoc` is about `Fin.last (p.snoc _ _).length`, but we often
-- see `Fin.last (p.length + 1)` in practice. They are equal by definition, but sometimes simplifier
-- does not pick up `last_snoc`
@[simp] lemma last_snoc' (p : RelSeries r) (newLast : α) (rel : r p.last newLast) :
p.snoc newLast rel (Fin.last (p.length + 1)) = newLast := last_append _ _ _
|
@[simp] lemma snoc_castSucc (s : RelSeries r) (a : α) (connect : r s.last a)
(i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : snoc s a connect (Fin.castSucc i) = s i :=
Fin.append_left _ _ i
lemma mem_snoc {p : RelSeries r} {newLast : α} {rel : r p.last newLast} {x : α} :
x ∈ p.snoc newLast rel ↔ x ∈ p ∨ x = newLast := by
| Mathlib/Order/RelSeries.lean | 458 | 464 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 John Nicol. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: John Nicol
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Wilson's theorem.
This file contains a proof of Wilson's theorem.
The heavy lifting is mostly done by the previous `wilsons_lemma`,
but here we also prove the other logical direction.
This could be generalized to similar results about finite abelian groups.
## References
* [Wilson's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson%27s_theorem)
## TODO
* Give `wilsons_lemma` a descriptive name.
-/
assert_not_exists legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity
open Finset Nat FiniteField ZMod
open scoped Nat
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- **Wilson's Lemma**: the product of `1`, ..., `p-1` is `-1` modulo `p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem wilsons_lemma : ((p - 1)! : ZMod p) = -1 := by
| refine
calc
((p - 1)! : ZMod p) = ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (succ (p - 1)), (x : ZMod p) := by
rw [← Finset.prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial, prod_natCast]
_ = ∏ x : (ZMod p)ˣ, (x : ZMod p) := ?_
_ = -1 := by
simp_rw [← Units.coeHom_apply, ← map_prod (Units.coeHom (ZMod p)),
prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one, Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_neg, Units.val_one]
have hp : 0 < p := (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).pos
symm
refine prod_bij (fun a _ => (a : ZMod p).val) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro a ha
rw [mem_Ico, ← Nat.succ_sub hp, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
constructor
· apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero; rw [← @val_zero p]
intro h; apply Units.ne_zero a (val_injective p h)
· exact val_lt _
· intro _ _ _ _ h; rw [Units.ext_iff]; exact val_injective p h
· intro b hb
rw [mem_Ico, Nat.succ_le_iff, ← succ_sub hp, Nat.add_one_sub_one, pos_iff_ne_zero] at hb
refine ⟨Units.mk0 b ?_, Finset.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
· intro h; apply hb.1; apply_fun val at h
simpa only [val_cast_of_lt hb.right, val_zero] using h
· simp only [val_cast_of_lt hb.right, Units.val_mk0]
· rintro a -; simp only [cast_id, natCast_val]
@[simp]
theorem prod_Ico_one_prime : ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 p, (x : ZMod p) = -1 := by
-- Porting note: was `conv in Ico 1 p =>`
conv =>
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Wilson.lean | 40 | 69 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,102 | 1,106 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Results about big operators over intervals
We prove results about big operators over intervals.
-/
open Nat
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [CommMonoid M] {f : α → M} {a b : α}
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f b * ∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x) * f b = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc h]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ioc h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioc_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc h]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Iio_mul_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
[CommMonoid M]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag (f : α → α → M) :
∏ i, ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, f j i * f i j = ∏ i, ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, f j i := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_disjUnion_Iio, prod_disjUnion, prod_mul_distrib]
congr 1
rw [prod_sigma', prod_sigma']
refine prod_nbij' (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp
end LinearOrder
section Generic
variable [CommMonoid M] {s₂ s₁ s : Finset α} {a : α} {g f : α → M}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add' [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (x + c)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
rw [← map_add_right_Ico, prod_map]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (c + x)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
convert prod_Ico_add' f a b c using 2
rw [add_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_Ico_add_right_sub_eq [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] (a b c : α) :
∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f (x - c) = ∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x := by
simp only [← map_add_right_Ico, prod_map, addRightEmbedding_apply, add_tsub_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ico a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k) * f b := by
rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hab, prod_insert right_not_mem_Ico, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot {a b : ℕ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k = f a * ∏ k ∈ Ico (a + 1) b, f k := by
have ha : a ∉ Ico (a + 1) b := by simp
rw [← prod_insert ha, Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left hab]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ico m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ico n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ico m k, f i :=
Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hmn hnk ▸ Eq.symm (prod_union (Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive m n k))
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ioc m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ioc n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ioc m k, f i := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc hmn hnk, prod_union]
apply disjoint_left.2 fun x hx h'x => _
intros x hx h'x
exact lt_irrefl _ ((mem_Ioc.1 h'x).1.trans_le (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ioc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ioc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← prod_Ioc_consecutive _ hab (Nat.le_succ b), Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Icc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b + 1) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Icc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Icc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.Ico_succ_right, prod_Ico_succ_top hab, Nat.Ico_succ_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_mul_prod_Ico (f : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) * ∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k) = ∏ k ∈ range n, f k :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ prod_Ico_consecutive f m.zero_le h
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_eq_mul_Ico (f : ℕ → M) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
∏ x ∈ Finset.range n, f x = f 0 * ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 n, f x :=
Finset.range_eq_Ico ▸ Finset.prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot hn f
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) * (∏ k ∈ range m, f k)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq.2 <| by (rw [mul_comm]; exact prod_range_mul_prod_Ico f h)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_div {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range m, f k := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv f h
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] {f : ℕ → α} {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k) = ∏ k ∈ range m with n ≤ k, f k := by
rw [← prod_Ico_eq_div f hnm]
congr
apply Finset.ext
simp only [mem_Ico, mem_filter, mem_range, *]
tauto
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i ≤ j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico i b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a (j + 1), f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
omega
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i < j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico (i + 1) b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a j, f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
omega
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_prod_range (f : ℕ → M) (m n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = ∏ k ∈ range (n - m), f (m + k) := by
by_cases h : m ≤ n
· rw [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, prod_Ico_add, zero_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· replace h : n ≤ m := le_of_not_ge h
rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h, range_zero, prod_empty, prod_empty]
theorem prod_Ico_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n + 1) :
(∏ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∏ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j := by
have : ∀ i < m, i ≤ n := by
intro i hi
exact (add_le_add_iff_right 1).1 (le_trans (Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le.1 hi) h)
rcases lt_or_le k m with hkm | hkm
· rw [← Nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (this _ hkm)]
refine (prod_image ?_).symm
simp only [mem_Ico]
rintro i ⟨_, im⟩ j ⟨_, jm⟩ Hij
rw [← tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ im), Hij, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ jm)]
· have : n + 1 - k ≤ n + 1 - m := by
rw [tsub_le_tsub_iff_left h]
exact hkm
simp only [hkm, Ico_eq_empty_of_le, prod_empty, tsub_le_iff_right, Ico_eq_empty_of_le
this]
theorem sum_Ico_reflect {δ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m ≤ n + 1) : (∑ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∑ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j :=
@prod_Ico_reflect (Multiplicative δ) _ f k m n h
theorem prod_range_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ j ∈ range n, f (n - 1 - j)) = ∏ j ∈ range n, f j := by
cases n
· simp
· simp only [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero]
rw [prod_Ico_reflect _ _ le_rfl]
simp
theorem sum_range_reflect {δ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ j ∈ range n, f (n - 1 - j)) = ∑ j ∈ range n, f j :=
@prod_range_reflect (Multiplicative δ) _ f n
@[simp]
theorem prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, (∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1), x) = n !
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [prod_Ico_succ_top <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.zero_le n, Nat.factorial_succ,
prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial n, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, (∏ x ∈ range n, (x + 1)) = n !
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by simp [factorial, Finset.range_succ, prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial n]
section GaussSum
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
theorem sum_range_id_mul_two (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, i) * 2 = n * (n - 1) :=
calc
(∑ i ∈ range n, i) * 2 = (∑ i ∈ range n, i) + ∑ i ∈ range n, (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [sum_range_reflect (fun i => i) n, mul_two]
_ = ∑ i ∈ range n, (i + (n - 1 - i)) := sum_add_distrib.symm
_ = ∑ _ ∈ range n, (n - 1) :=
sum_congr rfl fun _ hi => add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| mem_range.1 hi
_ = n * (n - 1) := by rw [sum_const, card_range, Nat.nsmul_eq_mul]
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
theorem sum_range_id (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, i = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
rw [← sum_range_id_mul_two n, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ zero_lt_two]
end GaussSum
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_diag_flip (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∏ m ∈ range n, ∏ k ∈ range (m + 1), f k (m - k)) =
∏ m ∈ range n, ∏ k ∈ range (n - m), f m k := by
rw [prod_sigma', prod_sigma']
refine prod_nbij' (fun a ↦ ⟨a.2, a.1 - a.2⟩) (fun a ↦ ⟨a.1 + a.2, a.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual only [mem_sigma, mem_range, lt_tsub_iff_left,
Nat.lt_succ_iff, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, Nat.zero_le, and_true, and_imp, imp_self,
implies_true, Sigma.forall, forall_const, add_tsub_cancel_of_le, Sigma.mk.inj_iff,
add_tsub_cancel_left, heq_eq_eq]
exact fun a b han hba ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt hba han
end Generic
section Nat
variable {M : Type*}
variable (f g : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ}
section Group
variable [CommGroup M]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ_div_prod : ((∏ i ∈ range (n + 1), f i) / ∏ i ∈ range n, f i) = f n :=
| div_eq_iff_eq_mul'.mpr <| prod_range_succ f n
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ_div_top : (∏ i ∈ range (n + 1), f i) / f n = ∏ i ∈ range n, f i :=
div_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr <| prod_range_succ f n
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_div_bot (hmn : m < n) : (∏ i ∈ Ico m n, f i) / f m = ∏ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i :=
div_eq_iff_eq_mul'.mpr <| prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot hmn _
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Intervals.lean | 291 | 301 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Deepro Choudhury, Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.PerfectPairing.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Reflection
/-!
# Root data and root systems
This file contains basic definitions for root systems and root data.
## Main definitions:
* `RootPairing`: Given two perfectly-paired `R`-modules `M` and `N` (over some commutative ring
`R`) a root pairing with indexing set `ι` is the data of an `ι`-indexed subset of `M`
("the roots") an `ι`-indexed subset of `N` ("the coroots"), and an `ι`-indexed set of
permutations of `ι` such that each root-coroot pair evaluates to `2`, and the permutation
attached to each element of `ι` is compatible with the reflections on the corresponding roots and
coroots.
* `RootDatum`: A root datum is a root pairing for which the roots and coroots take values in
finitely-generated free Abelian groups.
* `RootSystem`: A root system is a root pairing for which the roots span their ambient module.
## Implementation details
A root datum is sometimes defined as two subsets: roots and coroots, together with a bijection
between them, subject to hypotheses. However the hypotheses ensure that the bijection is unique and
so the question arises of whether this bijection should be part of the data of a root datum or
whether one should merely assert its existence. For root systems, things are even more extreme: the
coroots are uniquely determined by the roots. Furthermore a root system induces a canonical
non-degenerate bilinear form on the ambient space and many informal accounts even include this form
as part of the data.
We have opted for a design in which some of the uniquely-determined data is included: the bijection
between roots and coroots is (implicitly) included and the coroots are included for root systems.
Empirically this seems to be by far the most convenient design and by providing extensionality
lemmas expressing the uniqueness we expect to get the best of both worlds.
Furthermore, we require roots and coroots to be injections from a base indexing type `ι` rather than
subsets of their codomains. This design was chosen to avoid the bijection between roots and coroots
being a dependently-typed object. A third option would be to have the roots and coroots be subsets
but to avoid having a dependently-typed bijection by defining it globally with junk value `0`
outside of the roots and coroots. This would work but lacks the convenient symmetry that the chosen
design enjoys: by introducing the indexing type `ι`, one does not have to pick a direction
(`roots → coroots` or `coroots → roots`) for the forward direction of the bijection. Besides,
providing the user with the additional definitional power to specify an indexing type `ι` is a
benefit and the junk-value pattern is a cost.
As a final point of divergence from the classical literature, we make the reflection permutation on
roots and coroots explicit, rather than specifying only that reflection preserves the sets of roots
and coroots. This is necessary when working with infinite root systems, where the coroots are not
uniquely determined by the roots, because without it, the reflection permutations on roots and
coroots may not correspond. For this purpose, we define a map from `ι` to permutations on `ι`, and
require that it is compatible with reflections and coreflections.
-/
open Set Function
open Module hiding reflection
open Submodule (span)
open AddSubgroup (zmultiples)
noncomputable section
variable (ι R M N : Type*)
[CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
/-- Given two perfectly-paired `R`-modules `M` and `N`, a root pairing with indexing set `ι`
is the data of an `ι`-indexed subset of `M` ("the roots"), an `ι`-indexed subset of `N`
("the coroots"), and an `ι`-indexed set of permutations of `ι`, such that each root-coroot pair
evaluates to `2`, and the permutation attached to each element of `ι` is compatible with the
reflections on the corresponding roots and coroots.
It exists to allow for a convenient unification of the theories of root systems and root data. -/
structure RootPairing extends PerfectPairing R M N where
/-- A parametrized family of vectors, called roots. -/
root : ι ↪ M
/-- A parametrized family of dual vectors, called coroots. -/
coroot : ι ↪ N
root_coroot_two : ∀ i, toLinearMap (root i) (coroot i) = 2
/-- A parametrized family of permutations, induced by reflections. This corresponds to the
classical requirement that the symmetry attached to each root (later defined in
`RootPairing.reflection`) leave the whole set of roots stable: as explained above, we
formalize this stability by fixing the image of the roots through each reflection (whence the
permutation); and similarly for coroots. -/
reflection_perm : ι → (ι ≃ ι)
reflection_perm_root : ∀ i j,
root j - toPerfectPairing (root j) (coroot i) • root i = root (reflection_perm i j)
reflection_perm_coroot : ∀ i j,
coroot j - toPerfectPairing (root i) (coroot j) • coroot i = coroot (reflection_perm i j)
/-- A root datum is a root pairing with coefficients in the integers and for which the root and
coroot spaces are finitely-generated free Abelian groups.
Note that the latter assumptions `[Finite ℤ X₁] [Finite ℤ X₂]` should be supplied as mixins, and
that freeness follows automatically since two finitely-generated Abelian groups in perfect pairing
are necessarily free. Moreover Lean knows this, e.g., via `PerfectPairing.reflexive_left`,
`Module.instNoZeroSMulDivisorsOfIsDomain`, `Module.free_of_finite_type_torsion_free'`. -/
abbrev RootDatum (X₁ X₂ : Type*) [AddCommGroup X₁] [AddCommGroup X₂] := RootPairing ι ℤ X₁ X₂
/-- A root system is a root pairing for which the roots and coroots span their ambient modules.
Note that this is slightly more general than the usual definition in the sense that `N` is not
required to be the dual of `M`. -/
structure RootSystem extends RootPairing ι R M N where
span_root_eq_top : span R (range root) = ⊤
span_coroot_eq_top : span R (range coroot) = ⊤
attribute [simp] RootSystem.span_root_eq_top
attribute [simp] RootSystem.span_coroot_eq_top
namespace RootPairing
variable {ι R M N}
variable (P : RootPairing ι R M N) (i j : ι)
@[simp]
lemma toLinearMap_eq_toPerfectPairing (x : M) (y : N) :
P.toLinearMap x y = P.toPerfectPairing x y := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-20")]
alias toLin_toPerfectPairing := toLinearMap_eq_toPerfectPairing
/-- If we interchange the roles of `M` and `N`, we still have a root pairing. -/
protected def flip : RootPairing ι R N M :=
{ P.toPerfectPairing.flip with
root := P.coroot
coroot := P.root
root_coroot_two := P.root_coroot_two
reflection_perm := P.reflection_perm
reflection_perm_root := P.reflection_perm_coroot
reflection_perm_coroot := P.reflection_perm_root }
@[simp]
lemma flip_flip : P.flip.flip = P :=
rfl
variable (ι R M N) in
/-- `RootPairing.flip` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps] def flipEquiv : RootPairing ι R N M ≃ RootPairing ι R M N where
toFun P := P.flip
invFun P := P.flip
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- If we interchange the roles of `M` and `N`, we still have a root system. -/
protected def _root_.RootSystem.flip (P : RootSystem ι R M N) : RootSystem ι R N M :=
{ toRootPairing := P.toRootPairing.flip
span_root_eq_top := P.span_coroot_eq_top
span_coroot_eq_top := P.span_root_eq_top }
@[simp]
protected lemma _root_.RootSystem.flip_flip (P : RootSystem ι R M N) :
P.flip.flip = P :=
rfl
variable (ι R M N) in
/-- `RootSystem.flip` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps] def _root_.RootSystem.flipEquiv : RootSystem ι R N M ≃ RootSystem ι R M N where
toFun P := P.flip
invFun P := P.flip
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
lemma ne_zero [NeZero (2 : R)] : (P.root i : M) ≠ 0 :=
fun h ↦ NeZero.ne' (2 : R) <| by simpa [h] using P.root_coroot_two i
lemma ne_zero' [NeZero (2 : R)] : (P.coroot i : N) ≠ 0 :=
P.flip.ne_zero i
lemma exists_ne_zero [Nonempty ι] [NeZero (2 : R)] : ∃ i, P.root i ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨i⟩ := inferInstanceAs (Nonempty ι)
exact ⟨i, P.ne_zero i⟩
lemma exists_ne_zero' [Nonempty ι] [NeZero (2 : R)] : ∃ i, P.coroot i ≠ 0 :=
P.flip.exists_ne_zero
include P in
protected lemma nontrivial [Nonempty ι] [NeZero (2 : R)] : Nontrivial M := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := P.exists_ne_zero
exact ⟨P.root i, 0, hi⟩
include P in
protected lemma nontrivial' [Nonempty ι] [NeZero (2 : R)] : Nontrivial N :=
P.flip.nontrivial
/-- Roots written as functionals on the coweight space. -/
abbrev root' (i : ι) : Dual R N := P.toPerfectPairing (P.root i)
/-- Coroots written as functionals on the weight space. -/
abbrev coroot' (i : ι) : Dual R M := P.toPerfectPairing.flip (P.coroot i)
/-- This is the pairing between roots and coroots. -/
def pairing : R := P.root' i (P.coroot j)
@[simp]
lemma root_coroot_eq_pairing : P.toPerfectPairing (P.root i) (P.coroot j) = P.pairing i j :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma root'_coroot_eq_pairing : P.root' i (P.coroot j) = P.pairing i j :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma root_coroot'_eq_pairing : P.coroot' i (P.root j) = P.pairing j i :=
rfl
lemma coroot_root_eq_pairing : P.toLinearMap.flip (P.coroot i) (P.root j) = P.pairing j i := by
simp
@[simp]
lemma pairing_same : P.pairing i i = 2 := P.root_coroot_two i
lemma coroot_root_two :
P.toLinearMap.flip (P.coroot i) (P.root i) = 2 := by
simp
/-- The reflection associated to a root. -/
def reflection : M ≃ₗ[R] M :=
Module.reflection (P.flip.root_coroot_two i)
@[simp]
lemma root_reflection_perm (j : ι) :
P.root (P.reflection_perm i j) = (P.reflection i) (P.root j) :=
(P.reflection_perm_root i j).symm
theorem mapsTo_reflection_root :
MapsTo (P.reflection i) (range P.root) (range P.root) := by
rintro - ⟨j, rfl⟩
exact P.root_reflection_perm i j ▸ mem_range_self (P.reflection_perm i j)
lemma reflection_apply (x : M) :
P.reflection i x = x - (P.coroot' i x) • P.root i :=
rfl
lemma reflection_apply_root :
P.reflection i (P.root j) = P.root j - (P.pairing j i) • P.root i :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma reflection_apply_self :
P.reflection i (P.root i) = - P.root i :=
Module.reflection_apply_self (P.coroot_root_two i)
@[simp]
lemma reflection_same (x : M) :
P.reflection i (P.reflection i x) = x :=
Module.involutive_reflection (P.coroot_root_two i) x
@[simp]
lemma reflection_inv :
(P.reflection i)⁻¹ = P.reflection i :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma reflection_sq :
P.reflection i ^ 2 = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.mpr rfl
@[simp]
lemma reflection_perm_sq :
P.reflection_perm i ^ 2 = 1 := by
ext j
apply P.root.injective
simp only [sq, Equiv.Perm.mul_apply, root_reflection_perm, reflection_same, Equiv.Perm.one_apply]
@[simp]
lemma reflection_perm_inv :
(P.reflection_perm i)⁻¹ = P.reflection_perm i :=
(mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.mp <| P.reflection_perm_sq i).symm
@[simp]
lemma reflection_perm_self : P.reflection_perm i (P.reflection_perm i j) = j := by
apply P.root.injective
simp only [root_reflection_perm, reflection_same]
lemma reflection_perm_involutive : Involutive (P.reflection_perm i) :=
involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id.mpr (by ext; simp)
@[simp]
lemma reflection_perm_symm : (P.reflection_perm i).symm = P.reflection_perm i :=
Involutive.symm_eq_self_of_involutive (P.reflection_perm i) <| P.reflection_perm_involutive i
lemma bijOn_reflection_root :
BijOn (P.reflection i) (range P.root) (range P.root) :=
Module.bijOn_reflection_of_mapsTo _ <| P.mapsTo_reflection_root i
@[simp]
lemma reflection_image_eq :
P.reflection i '' (range P.root) = range P.root :=
(P.bijOn_reflection_root i).image_eq
|
/-- The reflection associated to a coroot. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/RootSystem/Defs.lean | 294 | 295 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.Isometry
/-!
# Angles between points
This file defines unoriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.angle`, with notation `∠`, is the undirected angle determined by three
points.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ : P}
/-- The undirected angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and
`p₃`. If either of those points equals `p₂`, this is π/2. Use
`open scoped EuclideanGeometry` to access the `∠ p₁ p₂ p₃`
notation. -/
nonrec def angle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : V) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp (by fun_prop)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.angle_coe {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (p₁ p₂ p₃ : s) :
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
∠ (p₁ : P) (p₂ : P) (p₃ : P) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
s.subtypeₐᵢ.angle_map p₁ p₂ p₃
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vadd (v : V) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) (v +ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVAdd ℝ P v).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vadd_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (p : P) : ∠ (v₁ +ᵥ p) (v₂ +ᵥ p) (v₃ +ᵥ p) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vsub (p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (p -ᵥ p₁) (p -ᵥ p₂) (p -ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVSub ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vsub_const (p₁ p₂ p₃ p : P) : ∠ (p₁ -ᵥ p) (p₂ -ᵥ p) (p₃ -ᵥ p) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).symm.toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_add_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ + v) (v₂ + v) (v₃ + v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_vadd_const _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_add (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v + v₁) (v + v₂) (v + v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_const_vadd _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_sub_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ - v) (v₂ - v) (v₃ - v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_vsub_const v₁ v₂ v₃ v
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_sub (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v - v₁) (v - v₂) (v - v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_const_vsub v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (-v₁) (-v₂) (-v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using angle_const_sub 0 v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- The angle at a point does not depend on the order of the other two
points. -/
nonrec theorem angle_comm (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ :=
angle_comm _ _
/-- The angle at a point is nonnegative. -/
nonrec theorem angle_nonneg (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : 0 ≤ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
angle_nonneg _ _
/-- The angle at a point is at most π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_le_pi (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≤ π :=
angle_le_pi _ _
/-- The angle ∠AAB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_left (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p₀ p₀ p = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [vsub_self]
exact angle_zero_left _
/-- The angle ∠ABB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_right (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p p₀ p₀ = π / 2 := by rw [angle_comm, angle_self_left]
/-- The angle ∠ABA at a point is `0`, unless `A = B`. -/
theorem angle_self_of_ne (h : p ≠ p₀) : ∠ p p₀ p = 0 := angle_self <| vsub_ne_zero.2 h
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BAC is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨hp₁p₂, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
unfold angle
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_ne_zero] at hp₁p₂
use hp₁p₂, -r + 1, add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, smul_neg]
simp [← hpr]
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BCA is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 := by
rw [angle_comm] at h
exact angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left h
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ABC = ∠ABD. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi (p₁ : P) {p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (h : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₄ = π) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₄ := by
unfold angle at *
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
rw [eq_comm]
convert angle_smul_right_of_pos (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂) (add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one)
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₃, smul_neg, neg_smul, ← hpr]
simp
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ACB + ∠ACD = π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi (p₁ : P) {p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (h : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₄ = π) :
∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ + ∠ p₁ p₃ p₄ = π := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_comm p₁ p₃ p₂, angle_comm p₁ p₃ p₄]
unfold angle
exact angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi _ h
/-- **Vertical Angles Theorem**: angles opposite each other, formed by two intersecting straight
lines, are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ : P} (hapc : ∠ p₁ p₅ p₃ = π)
(hbpd : ∠ p₂ p₅ p₄ = π) : ∠ p₁ p₅ p₂ = ∠ p₃ p₅ p₄ := by
linarith [angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p₁ hbpd, angle_comm p₄ p₅ p₁,
angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p₄ hapc, angle_comm p₄ p₅ p₃]
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist A B ≠ 0. -/
theorem left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : dist p₁ p₂ ≠ 0 := by
by_contra heq
rw [dist_eq_zero] at heq
rw [heq, angle_self_left] at h
exact Real.pi_ne_zero (by linarith)
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist C B ≠ 0. -/
theorem right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : dist p₃ p₂ ≠ 0 :=
left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi <| (angle_comm _ _ _).trans h
/-- If ∠ABC = π, then (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = π if and only if (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi (fun he => hp₁p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
hp₃p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- If ∠ABC = 0, then (dist A C) = abs ((dist A B) - (dist B C)). -/
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_of_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0) :
dist p₁ p₃ = |dist p₁ p₂ - dist p₃ p₂| := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = 0 if and only if (dist A C) = abs ((dist A B) - (dist B C)). -/
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_iff_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₃ = |dist p₁ p₂ - dist p₃ p₂| ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero (fun he => hp₁p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he))
fun he => hp₃p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB, then ∠AMB = π. -/
theorem angle_midpoint_eq_pi (p₁ p₂ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₁ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ = π := by
simp only [angle, left_vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, right_vsub_midpoint, inv_pos, zero_lt_two,
angle_smul_right_of_pos, angle_smul_left_of_pos]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂]
apply angle_self_neg_of_nonzero
simpa only [ne_eq, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq]
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB and C is the same distance from A as it is from B
then ∠CMA = π / 2. -/
theorem angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₃ p₁ = dist p₃ p₂) :
∠ p₃ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₁ = π / 2 := by
let m : P := midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂
have h1 : p₃ -ᵥ p₁ = p₃ -ᵥ m - (p₁ -ᵥ m) := (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₃ p₁ m).symm
have h2 : p₃ -ᵥ p₂ = p₃ -ᵥ m + (p₁ -ᵥ m) := by
rw [left_vsub_midpoint, ← midpoint_vsub_right, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₁, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₂, h1, h2] at h
exact (norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (p₃ -ᵥ m) (p₁ -ᵥ m)).mp h.symm
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB and C is the same distance from A as it is from B
then ∠CMB = π / 2. -/
theorem angle_right_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₃ p₁ = dist p₃ p₂) :
∠ p₃ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ = π / 2 := by
rw [midpoint_comm p₁ p₂, angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h.symm]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at that point
is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff]
| rcases h with ⟨⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, hp₂⟩, hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃⟩
refine ⟨vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂p₁.symm, -(1 - r) / r, ?_⟩
have hr0' : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₁
simp at hp₂p₁
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 249 | 254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
/-!
# The colon ideal
This file defines `Submodule.colon N P` as the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • P ⊆ N`.
The normal notation for this would be `N : P` which has already been taken by type theory.
-/
namespace Submodule
open Pointwise
variable {R M M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N N₁ N₂ P P₁ P₂ : Submodule R M}
/-- `N.colon P` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • P ⊆ N`. -/
def colon (N P : Submodule R M) : Ideal R where
carrier := {r : R | (r • P : Set M) ⊆ N}
add_mem' ha hb :=
(Set.add_smul_subset _ _ _).trans ((Set.add_subset_add ha hb).trans_eq (by simp [← coe_sup]))
zero_mem' := by simp [Set.zero_smul_set P.nonempty]
smul_mem' r := by
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, smul_eq_mul, mul_smul, Set.smul_set_subset_iff]
intro x hx y hy
exact N.smul_mem _ (hx hy)
theorem mem_colon {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ ∀ p ∈ P, r • p ∈ N := Set.smul_set_subset_iff
instance (priority := low) : (N.colon P).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left {r} s hr p hp := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ := hp
exact hr ⟨_, P.smul_mem _ hp, (mul_smul ..).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem colon_top {I : Ideal R} [I.IsTwoSided] : I.colon ⊤ = I := by
simp_rw [SetLike.ext_iff, mem_colon, smul_eq_mul]
exact fun x ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ mul_one x ▸ h 1 trivial, fun h _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem colon_bot : colon ⊥ N = N.annihilator := by
simp_rw [SetLike.ext_iff, mem_colon, mem_annihilator, mem_bot, forall_const]
theorem colon_mono (hn : N₁ ≤ N₂) (hp : P₁ ≤ P₂) : N₁.colon P₂ ≤ N₂.colon P₁ := fun _ hrnp =>
mem_colon.2 fun p₁ hp₁ => hn <| mem_colon.1 hrnp p₁ <| hp hp₁
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N N₁ N₂ P P₁ P₂ : Submodule R M}
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {N P : Submodule R M}
theorem mem_colon' {r} : r ∈ N.colon P ↔ P ≤ comap (r • (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M)) N :=
mem_colon
theorem iInf_colon_iSup (ι₁ : Sort*) (f : ι₁ → Submodule R M) (ι₂ : Sort*)
(g : ι₂ → Submodule R M) : (⨅ i, f i).colon (⨆ j, g j) = ⨅ (i) (j), (f i).colon (g j) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => colon_mono (iInf_le _ _) (le_iSup _ _)) fun _ H =>
mem_colon'.2 <|
iSup_le fun j =>
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
le_iInf fun i =>
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mem_colon'.1 <|
have := (mem_iInf _).1 H i
have := (mem_iInf _).1 this j
this
@[simp]
theorem mem_colon_singleton {N : Submodule R M} {x : M} {r : R} :
| r ∈ N.colon (Submodule.span R {x}) ↔ r • x ∈ N :=
calc
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Colon.lean | 86 | 87 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Action
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Map
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
/-!
# Fundamental domain of a group action
A set `s` is said to be a *fundamental domain* of an action of a group `G` on a measurable space `α`
with respect to a measure `μ` if
* `s` is a measurable set;
* the sets `g • s` over all `g : G` cover almost all points of the whole space;
* the sets `g • s`, are pairwise a.e. disjoint, i.e., `μ (g₁ • s ∩ g₂ • s) = 0` whenever `g₁ ≠ g₂`;
we require this for `g₂ = 1` in the definition, then deduce it for any two `g₁ ≠ g₂`.
In this file we prove that in case of a countable group `G` and a measure preserving action, any two
fundamental domains have the same measure, and for a `G`-invariant function, its integrals over any
two fundamental domains are equal to each other.
We also generate additive versions of all theorems in this file using the `to_additive` attribute.
* We define the `HasFundamentalDomain` typeclass, in particular to be able to define the `covolume`
of a quotient of `α` by a group `G`, which under reasonable conditions does not depend on the choice
of fundamental domain.
* We define the `QuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage` typeclass to describe a situation in which a
measure `μ` on `α ⧸ G` can be computed by taking a measure `ν` on `α` of the intersection of the
pullback with a fundamental domain.
## Main declarations
* `MeasureTheory.IsFundamentalDomain`: Predicate for a set to be a fundamental domain of the
action of a group
* `MeasureTheory.fundamentalFrontier`: Fundamental frontier of a set under the action of a group.
Elements of `s` that belong to some other translate of `s`.
* `MeasureTheory.fundamentalInterior`: Fundamental interior of a set under the action of a group.
Elements of `s` that do not belong to any other translate of `s`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Filter
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measurable set `s` is a *fundamental domain* for an additive action of an additive group `G`
on a measurable space `α` with respect to a measure `α` if the sets `g +ᵥ s`, `g : G`, are pairwise
a.e. disjoint and cover the whole space. -/
structure IsAddFundamentalDomain (G : Type*) {α : Type*} [Zero G] [VAdd G α] [MeasurableSpace α]
(s : Set α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop where
protected nullMeasurableSet : NullMeasurableSet s μ
protected ae_covers : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ g : G, g +ᵥ x ∈ s
protected aedisjoint : Pairwise <| (AEDisjoint μ on fun g : G => g +ᵥ s)
/-- A measurable set `s` is a *fundamental domain* for an action of a group `G` on a measurable
space `α` with respect to a measure `α` if the sets `g • s`, `g : G`, are pairwise a.e. disjoint and
cover the whole space. -/
@[to_additive IsAddFundamentalDomain]
structure IsFundamentalDomain (G : Type*) {α : Type*} [One G] [SMul G α] [MeasurableSpace α]
(s : Set α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop where
protected nullMeasurableSet : NullMeasurableSet s μ
protected ae_covers : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ g : G, g • x ∈ s
protected aedisjoint : Pairwise <| (AEDisjoint μ on fun g : G => g • s)
variable {G H α β E : Type*}
namespace IsFundamentalDomain
variable [Group G] [Group H] [MulAction G α] [MeasurableSpace α] [MulAction H β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {s t : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- If for each `x : α`, exactly one of `g • x`, `g : G`, belongs to a measurable set `s`, then `s`
is a fundamental domain for the action of `G` on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "If for each `x : α`, exactly one of `g +ᵥ x`, `g : G`, belongs to a measurable set
`s`, then `s` is a fundamental domain for the additive action of `G` on `α`."]
theorem mk' (h_meas : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (h_exists : ∀ x : α, ∃! g : G, g • x ∈ s) :
IsFundamentalDomain G s μ where
nullMeasurableSet := h_meas
ae_covers := Eventually.of_forall fun x => (h_exists x).exists
aedisjoint a b hab := Disjoint.aedisjoint <| disjoint_left.2 fun x hxa hxb => by
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem] at hxa hxb
exact hab (inv_injective <| (h_exists x).unique hxa hxb)
/-- For `s` to be a fundamental domain, it's enough to check
`MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint (g • s) s` for `g ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "For `s` to be a fundamental domain, it's enough to check
`MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint (g +ᵥ s) s` for `g ≠ 0`."]
theorem mk'' (h_meas : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (h_ae_covers : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ g : G, g • x ∈ s)
(h_ae_disjoint : ∀ g, g ≠ (1 : G) → AEDisjoint μ (g • s) s)
(h_qmp : ∀ g : G, QuasiMeasurePreserving ((g • ·) : α → α) μ μ) :
IsFundamentalDomain G s μ where
nullMeasurableSet := h_meas
ae_covers := h_ae_covers
aedisjoint := pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_one h_ae_disjoint h_qmp
/-- If a measurable space has a finite measure `μ` and a countable group `G` acts
quasi-measure-preservingly, then to show that a set `s` is a fundamental domain, it is sufficient
to check that its translates `g • s` are (almost) disjoint and that the sum `∑' g, μ (g • s)` is
sufficiently large. -/
@[to_additive
"If a measurable space has a finite measure `μ` and a countable additive group `G` acts
quasi-measure-preservingly, then to show that a set `s` is a fundamental domain, it is sufficient
to check that its translates `g +ᵥ s` are (almost) disjoint and that the sum `∑' g, μ (g +ᵥ s)` is
sufficiently large."]
theorem mk_of_measure_univ_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [Countable G] (h_meas : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(h_ae_disjoint : ∀ g ≠ (1 : G), AEDisjoint μ (g • s) s)
(h_qmp : ∀ g : G, QuasiMeasurePreserving (g • · : α → α) μ μ)
(h_measure_univ_le : μ (univ : Set α) ≤ ∑' g : G, μ (g • s)) : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ :=
have aedisjoint : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on fun g : G => g • s) :=
pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_one h_ae_disjoint h_qmp
{ nullMeasurableSet := h_meas
aedisjoint
ae_covers := by
replace h_meas : ∀ g : G, NullMeasurableSet (g • s) μ := fun g => by
rw [← inv_inv g, ← preimage_smul]; exact h_meas.preimage (h_qmp g⁻¹)
have h_meas' : NullMeasurableSet {a | ∃ g : G, g • a ∈ s} μ := by
rw [← iUnion_smul_eq_setOf_exists]; exact .iUnion h_meas
rw [ae_iff_measure_eq h_meas', ← iUnion_smul_eq_setOf_exists]
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono <| subset_univ _) ?_
rw [measure_iUnion₀ aedisjoint h_meas]
exact h_measure_univ_le }
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_smul_ae_eq (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) : ⋃ g : G, g • s =ᵐ[μ] univ :=
eventuallyEq_univ.2 <| h.ae_covers.mono fun _ ⟨g, hg⟩ =>
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨g⁻¹, _, hg, inv_smul_smul _ _⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_ne_zero [Countable G] [SMulInvariantMeasure G α μ]
(hμ : μ ≠ 0) (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) : μ s ≠ 0 := by
have hc := measure_univ_pos.mpr hμ
contrapose! hc
rw [← measure_congr h.iUnion_smul_ae_eq]
refine le_trans (measure_iUnion_le _) ?_
simp_rw [measure_smul, hc, tsum_zero, le_refl]
@[to_additive]
theorem mono (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) {ν : Measure α} (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
IsFundamentalDomain G s ν :=
⟨h.1.mono_ac hle, hle h.2, h.aedisjoint.mono fun _ _ h => hle h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem preimage_of_equiv {ν : Measure β} (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) {f : β → α}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f ν μ) {e : G → H} (he : Bijective e)
(hef : ∀ g, Semiconj f (e g • ·) (g • ·)) : IsFundamentalDomain H (f ⁻¹' s) ν where
nullMeasurableSet := h.nullMeasurableSet.preimage hf
ae_covers := (hf.ae h.ae_covers).mono fun x ⟨g, hg⟩ => ⟨e g, by rwa [mem_preimage, hef g x]⟩
aedisjoint a b hab := by
lift e to G ≃ H using he
have : (e.symm a⁻¹)⁻¹ ≠ (e.symm b⁻¹)⁻¹ := by simp [hab]
have := (h.aedisjoint this).preimage hf
simp only [Semiconj] at hef
simpa only [onFun, ← preimage_smul_inv, preimage_preimage, ← hef, e.apply_symm_apply, inv_inv]
using this
@[to_additive]
theorem image_of_equiv {ν : Measure β} (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α ≃ β)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f.symm ν μ) (e : H ≃ G)
(hef : ∀ g, Semiconj f (e g • ·) (g • ·)) : IsFundamentalDomain H (f '' s) ν := by
rw [f.image_eq_preimage]
refine h.preimage_of_equiv hf e.symm.bijective fun g x => ?_
rcases f.surjective x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [← hef _ _, f.symm_apply_apply, f.symm_apply_apply, e.apply_symm_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_aedisjoint_of_ac {ν} (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (hν : ν ≪ μ) :
Pairwise fun g₁ g₂ : G => AEDisjoint ν (g₁ • s) (g₂ • s) :=
h.aedisjoint.mono fun _ _ H => hν H
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_of_comm {G' : Type*} [Group G'] [MulAction G' α] [MeasurableSpace G']
[MeasurableSMul G' α] [SMulInvariantMeasure G' α μ] [SMulCommClass G' G α]
(h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (g : G') : IsFundamentalDomain G (g • s) μ :=
h.image_of_equiv (MulAction.toPerm g) (measurePreserving_smul _ _).quasiMeasurePreserving
(Equiv.refl _) <| smul_comm g
variable [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSMul G α] [SMulInvariantMeasure G α μ]
@[to_additive]
theorem nullMeasurableSet_smul (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (g : G) :
NullMeasurableSet (g • s) μ :=
h.nullMeasurableSet.smul g
@[to_additive]
theorem restrict_restrict (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (g : G) (t : Set α) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict (g • s) = μ.restrict (g • s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ ((h.nullMeasurableSet_smul g).mono restrict_le_self)
@[to_additive]
theorem smul (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (g : G) : IsFundamentalDomain G (g • s) μ :=
h.image_of_equiv (MulAction.toPerm g) (measurePreserving_smul _ _).quasiMeasurePreserving
⟨fun g' => g⁻¹ * g' * g, fun g' => g * g' * g⁻¹, fun g' => by simp [mul_assoc], fun g' => by
simp [mul_assoc]⟩
fun g' x => by simp [smul_smul, mul_assoc]
variable [Countable G] {ν : Measure α}
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_restrict_of_ac (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (hν : ν ≪ μ) :
(sum fun g : G => ν.restrict (g • s)) = ν := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_ae (h.aedisjoint.mono fun i j h => hν h) fun g =>
(h.nullMeasurableSet_smul g).mono_ac hν,
restrict_congr_set (hν h.iUnion_smul_ae_eq), restrict_univ]
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_eq_tsum_of_ac (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (hν : ν ≪ μ) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂ν = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • s, f x ∂ν := by
rw [← lintegral_sum_measure, h.sum_restrict_of_ac hν]
@[to_additive]
theorem sum_restrict (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) : (sum fun g : G => μ.restrict (g • s)) = μ :=
h.sum_restrict_of_ac (refl _)
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_eq_tsum (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • s, f x ∂μ :=
h.lintegral_eq_tsum_of_ac (refl _) f
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_eq_tsum' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • s, f x ∂μ := h.lintegral_eq_tsum f
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g⁻¹ • s, f x ∂μ := ((Equiv.inv G).tsum_eq _).symm
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ := tsum_congr fun g => Eq.symm <|
(measurePreserving_smul g⁻¹ μ).setLIntegral_comp_emb (measurableEmbedding_const_smul _) _ _
@[to_additive] lemma lintegral_eq_tsum'' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in s, f (g • x) ∂μ :=
(lintegral_eq_tsum' h f).trans ((Equiv.inv G).tsum_eq (fun g ↦ ∫⁻ (x : α) in s, f (g • x) ∂μ))
@[to_additive]
theorem setLIntegral_eq_tsum (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in t ∩ g • s, f x ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • s, f x ∂μ.restrict t :=
h.lintegral_eq_tsum_of_ac restrict_le_self.absolutelyContinuous _
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in t ∩ g • s, f x ∂μ := by simp only [h.restrict_restrict, inter_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem setLIntegral_eq_tsum' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • t ∩ s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in t ∩ g • s, f x ∂μ := h.setLIntegral_eq_tsum f t
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in t ∩ g⁻¹ • s, f x ∂μ := ((Equiv.inv G).tsum_eq _).symm
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g⁻¹ • (g • t ∩ s), f x ∂μ := by simp only [smul_set_inter, inv_smul_smul]
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • t ∩ s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ := tsum_congr fun g => Eq.symm <|
(measurePreserving_smul g⁻¹ μ).setLIntegral_comp_emb (measurableEmbedding_const_smul _) _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_eq_tsum_of_ac (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (hν : ν ≪ μ) (t : Set α) :
ν t = ∑' g : G, ν (t ∩ g • s) := by
have H : ν.restrict t ≪ μ := Measure.restrict_le_self.absolutelyContinuous.trans hν
simpa only [setLIntegral_one, Pi.one_def,
Measure.restrict_apply₀ ((h.nullMeasurableSet_smul _).mono_ac H), inter_comm] using
h.lintegral_eq_tsum_of_ac H 1
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_eq_tsum' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ t = ∑' g : G, μ (t ∩ g • s) :=
h.measure_eq_tsum_of_ac AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl t
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_eq_tsum (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ t = ∑' g : G, μ (g • t ∩ s) := by
simpa only [setLIntegral_one] using h.setLIntegral_eq_tsum' (fun _ => 1) t
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_zero_of_invariant (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (t : Set α)
(ht : ∀ g : G, g • t = t) (hts : μ (t ∩ s) = 0) : μ t = 0 := by
rw [measure_eq_tsum h]; simp [ht, hts]
/-- Given a measure space with an action of a finite group `G`, the measure of any `G`-invariant set
is determined by the measure of its intersection with a fundamental domain for the action of `G`. -/
@[to_additive measure_eq_card_smul_of_vadd_ae_eq_self "Given a measure space with an action of a
finite additive group `G`, the measure of any `G`-invariant set is determined by the measure of
its intersection with a fundamental domain for the action of `G`."]
theorem measure_eq_card_smul_of_smul_ae_eq_self [Finite G] (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ)
(t : Set α) (ht : ∀ g : G, (g • t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ t = Nat.card G • μ (t ∩ s) := by
haveI : Fintype G := Fintype.ofFinite G
rw [h.measure_eq_tsum]
replace ht : ∀ g : G, (g • t ∩ s : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (t ∩ s : Set α) := fun g =>
ae_eq_set_inter (ht g) (ae_eq_refl s)
simp_rw [measure_congr (ht _), tsum_fintype, Finset.sum_const, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
Finset.card_univ]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem setLIntegral_eq (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ)
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ (g : G) (x), f (g • x) = f x) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in s ∩ g • t, f x ∂μ := ht.setLIntegral_eq_tsum _ _
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫⁻ x in g • t ∩ s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ := by simp only [hf, inter_comm]
_ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := (hs.setLIntegral_eq_tsum' _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_set_eq (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ) {A : Set α}
(hA₀ : MeasurableSet A) (hA : ∀ g : G, (fun x => g • x) ⁻¹' A = A) : μ (A ∩ s) = μ (A ∩ t) := by
have : ∫⁻ x in s, A.indicator 1 x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, A.indicator 1 x ∂μ := by
refine hs.setLIntegral_eq ht (Set.indicator A fun _ => 1) fun g x ↦ ?_
convert (Set.indicator_comp_right (g • · : α → α) (g := fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0∞))).symm
rw [hA g]
simpa [Measure.restrict_apply hA₀, lintegral_indicator hA₀] using this
/-- If `s` and `t` are two fundamental domains of the same action, then their measures are equal. -/
@[to_additive "If `s` and `t` are two fundamental domains of the same action, then their measures
are equal."]
protected theorem measure_eq (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ) :
μ s = μ t := by
simpa only [setLIntegral_one] using hs.setLIntegral_eq ht (fun _ => 1) fun _ _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable_on_iff {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ)
{f : α → β} (hf : ∀ (g : G) (x), f (g • x) = f x) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict t) :=
calc
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) ↔
AEStronglyMeasurable f (Measure.sum fun g : G => μ.restrict (g • t ∩ s)) := by
simp only [← ht.restrict_restrict,
ht.sum_restrict_of_ac restrict_le_self.absolutelyContinuous]
_ ↔ ∀ g : G, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (g • (g⁻¹ • s ∩ t))) := by
simp only [smul_set_inter, inter_comm, smul_inv_smul, aestronglyMeasurable_sum_measure_iff]
_ ↔ ∀ g : G, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (g⁻¹ • (g⁻¹⁻¹ • s ∩ t))) :=
inv_surjective.forall
_ ↔ ∀ g : G, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (g⁻¹ • (g • s ∩ t))) := by simp only [inv_inv]
_ ↔ ∀ g : G, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict (g • s ∩ t)) := by
refine forall_congr' fun g => ?_
have he : MeasurableEmbedding (g⁻¹ • · : α → α) := measurableEmbedding_const_smul _
rw [← image_smul, ← ((measurePreserving_smul g⁻¹ μ).restrict_image_emb he
_).aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff he]
simp only [Function.comp_def, hf]
_ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict t) := by
simp only [← aestronglyMeasurable_sum_measure_iff, ← hs.restrict_restrict,
hs.sum_restrict_of_ac restrict_le_self.absolutelyContinuous]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias aEStronglyMeasurable_on_iff := MeasureTheory.IsFundamentalDomain.aestronglyMeasurable_on_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias _root_.MeasureTheory.IsAddFundamentalDomain.aEStronglyMeasurable_on_iff :=
MeasureTheory.IsAddFundamentalDomain.aestronglyMeasurable_on_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem hasFiniteIntegral_on_iff (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ)
(ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ) {f : α → E} (hf : ∀ (g : G) (x), f (g • x) = f x) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.restrict s) ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.restrict t) := by
dsimp only [HasFiniteIntegral]
rw [hs.setLIntegral_eq ht]
intro g x; rw [hf]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem integrableOn_iff (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ)
{f : α → E} (hf : ∀ (g : G) (x), f (g • x) = f x) : IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn f t μ :=
and_congr (hs.aestronglyMeasurable_on_iff ht hf) (hs.hasFiniteIntegral_on_iff ht hf)
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
@[to_additive]
theorem integral_eq_tsum_of_ac (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (hν : ν ≪ μ) (f : α → E)
(hf : Integrable f ν) : ∫ x, f x ∂ν = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • s, f x ∂ν := by
rw [← MeasureTheory.integral_sum_measure, h.sum_restrict_of_ac hν]
rw [h.sum_restrict_of_ac hν]
exact hf
@[to_additive]
theorem integral_eq_tsum (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_eq_tsum_of_ac h (by rfl) f hf
@[to_additive]
theorem integral_eq_tsum' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ :=
calc
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • s, f x ∂μ := h.integral_eq_tsum f hf
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g⁻¹ • s, f x ∂μ := ((Equiv.inv G).tsum_eq _).symm
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ := tsum_congr fun g =>
(measurePreserving_smul g⁻¹ μ).setIntegral_image_emb (measurableEmbedding_const_smul _) _ _
@[to_additive] lemma integral_eq_tsum'' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ)
(f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in s, f (g • x) ∂μ :=
(integral_eq_tsum' h f hf).trans ((Equiv.inv G).tsum_eq (fun g ↦ ∫ (x : α) in s, f (g • x) ∂μ))
@[to_additive]
theorem setIntegral_eq_tsum (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) {f : α → E} {t : Set α}
(hf : IntegrableOn f t μ) : ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in t ∩ g • s, f x ∂μ :=
calc
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • s, f x ∂μ.restrict t :=
h.integral_eq_tsum_of_ac restrict_le_self.absolutelyContinuous f hf
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in t ∩ g • s, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [h.restrict_restrict, measure_smul, inter_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem setIntegral_eq_tsum' (h : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) {f : α → E} {t : Set α}
(hf : IntegrableOn f t μ) : ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • t ∩ s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ :=
calc
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in t ∩ g • s, f x ∂μ := h.setIntegral_eq_tsum hf
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in t ∩ g⁻¹ • s, f x ∂μ := ((Equiv.inv G).tsum_eq _).symm
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g⁻¹ • (g • t ∩ s), f x ∂μ := by simp only [smul_set_inter, inv_smul_smul]
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • t ∩ s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ :=
tsum_congr fun g =>
(measurePreserving_smul g⁻¹ μ).setIntegral_image_emb (measurableEmbedding_const_smul _) _ _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem setIntegral_eq (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (ht : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ)
{f : α → E} (hf : ∀ (g : G) (x), f (g • x) = f x) : ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ
· have hft : IntegrableOn f t μ := by rwa [ht.integrableOn_iff hs hf]
calc
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in s ∩ g • t, f x ∂μ := ht.setIntegral_eq_tsum hfs
_ = ∑' g : G, ∫ x in g • t ∩ s, f (g⁻¹ • x) ∂μ := by simp only [hf, inter_comm]
_ = ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ := (hs.setIntegral_eq_tsum' hft).symm
· rw [integral_undef hfs, integral_undef]
rwa [hs.integrableOn_iff ht hf] at hfs
/-- If the action of a countable group `G` admits an invariant measure `μ` with a fundamental domain
`s`, then every null-measurable set `t` such that the sets `g • t ∩ s` are pairwise a.e.-disjoint
has measure at most `μ s`. -/
@[to_additive "If the additive action of a countable group `G` admits an invariant measure `μ` with
a fundamental domain `s`, then every null-measurable set `t` such that the sets `g +ᵥ t ∩ s` are
pairwise a.e.-disjoint has measure at most `μ s`."]
theorem measure_le_of_pairwise_disjoint (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on fun g : G => g • t ∩ s)) :
μ t ≤ μ s :=
calc
μ t = ∑' g : G, μ (g • t ∩ s) := hs.measure_eq_tsum t
_ = μ (⋃ g : G, g • t ∩ s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion₀ hd fun _ =>
(ht.smul _).inter hs.nullMeasurableSet
_ ≤ μ s := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun _ => inter_subset_right)
/-- If the action of a countable group `G` admits an invariant measure `μ` with a fundamental domain
`s`, then every null-measurable set `t` of measure strictly greater than `μ s` contains two
points `x y` such that `g • x = y` for some `g ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "If the additive action of a countable group `G` admits an invariant measure `μ` with
a fundamental domain `s`, then every null-measurable set `t` of measure strictly greater than
`μ s` contains two points `x y` such that `g +ᵥ x = y` for some `g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_smul_eq (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) (htm : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(ht : μ s < μ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ t, ∃ g, g ≠ (1 : G) ∧ g • x = y := by
contrapose! ht
refine hs.measure_le_of_pairwise_disjoint htm (Pairwise.aedisjoint fun g₁ g₂ hne => ?_)
dsimp [Function.onFun]
refine (Disjoint.inf_left _ ?_).inf_right _
rw [Set.disjoint_left]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, hxy : g₂ • y = g₁ • x⟩
refine ht x hx y hy (g₂⁻¹ * g₁) (mt inv_mul_eq_one.1 hne.symm) ?_
rw [mul_smul, ← hxy, inv_smul_smul]
/-- If `f` is invariant under the action of a countable group `G`, and `μ` is a `G`-invariant
measure with a fundamental domain `s`, then the `essSup` of `f` restricted to `s` is the same as
that of `f` on all of its domain. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is invariant under the action of a countable additive group `G`, and `μ` is a
`G`-invariant measure with a fundamental domain `s`, then the `essSup` of `f` restricted to `s`
is the same as that of `f` on all of its domain."]
theorem essSup_measure_restrict (hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ γ : G, ∀ x : α, f (γ • x) = f x) : essSup f (μ.restrict s) = essSup f μ := by
refine le_antisymm (essSup_mono_measure' Measure.restrict_le_self) ?_
rw [essSup_eq_sInf (μ.restrict s) f, essSup_eq_sInf μ f]
refine sInf_le_sInf ?_
rintro a (ha : (μ.restrict s) {x : α | a < f x} = 0)
rw [Measure.restrict_apply₀' hs.nullMeasurableSet] at ha
refine measure_zero_of_invariant hs _ ?_ ha
intro γ
ext x
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hf γ⁻¹ x]
end IsFundamentalDomain
/-! ### Interior/frontier of a fundamental domain -/
section MeasurableSpace
variable (G) [Group G] [MulAction G α] (s : Set α) {x : α}
/-- The boundary of a fundamental domain, those points of the domain that also lie in a nontrivial
translate. -/
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.addFundamentalFrontier "The boundary of a fundamental domain, those
points of the domain that also lie in a nontrivial translate."]
def fundamentalFrontier : Set α :=
s ∩ ⋃ (g : G) (_ : g ≠ 1), g • s
/-- The interior of a fundamental domain, those points of the domain not lying in any translate. -/
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.addFundamentalInterior "The interior of a fundamental domain, those
points of the domain not lying in any translate."]
def fundamentalInterior : Set α :=
s \ ⋃ (g : G) (_ : g ≠ 1), g • s
variable {G s}
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.mem_addFundamentalFrontier]
theorem mem_fundamentalFrontier :
x ∈ fundamentalFrontier G s ↔ x ∈ s ∧ ∃ g : G, g ≠ 1 ∧ x ∈ g • s := by
simp [fundamentalFrontier]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.mem_addFundamentalInterior]
theorem mem_fundamentalInterior :
x ∈ fundamentalInterior G s ↔ x ∈ s ∧ ∀ g : G, g ≠ 1 → x ∉ g • s := by
simp [fundamentalInterior]
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.addFundamentalFrontier_subset]
theorem fundamentalFrontier_subset : fundamentalFrontier G s ⊆ s :=
inter_subset_left
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.addFundamentalInterior_subset]
theorem fundamentalInterior_subset : fundamentalInterior G s ⊆ s :=
diff_subset
variable (G s)
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.disjoint_addFundamentalInterior_addFundamentalFrontier]
theorem disjoint_fundamentalInterior_fundamentalFrontier :
Disjoint (fundamentalInterior G s) (fundamentalFrontier G s) :=
disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right inf_le_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.addFundamentalInterior_union_addFundamentalFrontier]
theorem fundamentalInterior_union_fundamentalFrontier :
fundamentalInterior G s ∪ fundamentalFrontier G s = s :=
diff_union_inter _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.addFundamentalFrontier_union_addFundamentalInterior]
theorem fundamentalFrontier_union_fundamentalInterior :
fundamentalFrontier G s ∪ fundamentalInterior G s = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.sdiff_addFundamentalInterior]
theorem sdiff_fundamentalInterior : s \ fundamentalInterior G s = fundamentalFrontier G s :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.sdiff_addFundamentalFrontier]
theorem sdiff_fundamentalFrontier : s \ fundamentalFrontier G s = fundamentalInterior G s :=
diff_self_inter
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.addFundamentalFrontier_vadd]
theorem fundamentalFrontier_smul [Group H] [MulAction H α] [SMulCommClass H G α] (g : H) :
fundamentalFrontier G (g • s) = g • fundamentalFrontier G s := by
simp_rw [fundamentalFrontier, smul_set_inter, smul_set_iUnion, smul_comm g (_ : G) (_ : Set α)]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) MeasureTheory.addFundamentalInterior_vadd]
theorem fundamentalInterior_smul [Group H] [MulAction H α] [SMulCommClass H G α] (g : H) :
fundamentalInterior G (g • s) = g • fundamentalInterior G s := by
simp_rw [fundamentalInterior, smul_set_sdiff, smul_set_iUnion, smul_comm g (_ : G) (_ : Set α)]
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.pairwise_disjoint_addFundamentalInterior]
theorem pairwise_disjoint_fundamentalInterior :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun g : G => g • fundamentalInterior G s) := by
refine fun a b hab => disjoint_left.2 ?_
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
rw [mem_fundamentalInterior] at hx hy
refine hx.2 (a⁻¹ * b) ?_ ?_
· rwa [Ne, inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_one, eq_comm]
· simpa [mul_smul, ← hxy, mem_inv_smul_set_iff] using hy.1
variable [Countable G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSMul G α] {μ : Measure α}
[SMulInvariantMeasure G α μ]
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.addFundamentalFrontier]
protected theorem NullMeasurableSet.fundamentalFrontier (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (fundamentalFrontier G s) μ :=
hs.inter <| .iUnion fun _ => .iUnion fun _ => hs.smul _
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.addFundamentalInterior]
protected theorem NullMeasurableSet.fundamentalInterior (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (fundamentalInterior G s) μ :=
hs.diff <| .iUnion fun _ => .iUnion fun _ => hs.smul _
end MeasurableSpace
namespace IsFundamentalDomain
variable [Countable G] [Group G] [MulAction G α] [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ)
include hs
section Group
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.IsAddFundamentalDomain.measure_addFundamentalFrontier]
theorem measure_fundamentalFrontier : μ (fundamentalFrontier G s) = 0 := by
simpa only [fundamentalFrontier, iUnion₂_inter, one_smul, measure_iUnion_null_iff, inter_comm s,
Function.onFun] using fun g (hg : g ≠ 1) => hs.aedisjoint hg
@[to_additive MeasureTheory.IsAddFundamentalDomain.measure_addFundamentalInterior]
theorem measure_fundamentalInterior : μ (fundamentalInterior G s) = μ s :=
measure_diff_null' hs.measure_fundamentalFrontier
end Group
variable [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSMul G α] [SMulInvariantMeasure G α μ]
protected theorem fundamentalInterior : IsFundamentalDomain G (fundamentalInterior G s) μ where
nullMeasurableSet := hs.nullMeasurableSet.fundamentalInterior _ _
ae_covers := by
simp_rw [ae_iff, not_exists, ← mem_inv_smul_set_iff, setOf_forall, ← compl_setOf,
setOf_mem_eq, ← compl_iUnion]
have :
((⋃ g : G, g⁻¹ • s) \ ⋃ g : G, g⁻¹ • fundamentalFrontier G s) ⊆
⋃ g : G, g⁻¹ • fundamentalInterior G s := by
simp_rw [diff_subset_iff, ← iUnion_union_distrib, ← smul_set_union (α := G) (β := α),
fundamentalFrontier_union_fundamentalInterior]; rfl
refine eq_bot_mono (μ.mono <| compl_subset_compl.2 this) ?_
simp only [iUnion_inv_smul, compl_sdiff, ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, himp_eq, sup_eq_union,
@iUnion_smul_eq_setOf_exists _ _ _ _ s]
exact measure_union_null
(measure_iUnion_null fun _ => measure_smul_null hs.measure_fundamentalFrontier _) hs.ae_covers
aedisjoint := (pairwise_disjoint_fundamentalInterior _ _).mono fun _ _ => Disjoint.aedisjoint
end IsFundamentalDomain
section FundamentalDomainMeasure
variable (G) [Group G] [MulAction G α] [MeasurableSpace α]
(μ : Measure α)
local notation "α_mod_G" => MulAction.orbitRel G α
local notation "π" => @Quotient.mk _ α_mod_G
variable {G}
@[to_additive addMeasure_map_restrict_apply]
lemma measure_map_restrict_apply (s : Set α) {U : Set (Quotient α_mod_G)}
(meas_U : MeasurableSet U) :
(μ.restrict s).map π U = μ ((π ⁻¹' U) ∩ s) := by
rw [map_apply (f := π) (fun V hV ↦ measurableSet_quotient.mp hV) meas_U,
Measure.restrict_apply (t := (Quotient.mk α_mod_G ⁻¹' U)) (measurableSet_quotient.mp meas_U)]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsFundamentalDomain.quotientMeasure_eq [Countable G] [MeasurableSpace G] {s t : Set α}
[SMulInvariantMeasure G α μ] [MeasurableSMul G α] (fund_dom_s : IsFundamentalDomain G s μ)
(fund_dom_t : IsFundamentalDomain G t μ) :
(μ.restrict s).map π = (μ.restrict t).map π := by
ext U meas_U
rw [measure_map_restrict_apply (meas_U := meas_U), measure_map_restrict_apply (meas_U := meas_U)]
apply MeasureTheory.IsFundamentalDomain.measure_set_eq fund_dom_s fund_dom_t
· exact measurableSet_quotient.mp meas_U
· intro g
ext x
have : Quotient.mk α_mod_G (g • x) = Quotient.mk α_mod_G x := by
apply Quotient.sound
use g
simp only [mem_preimage, this]
end FundamentalDomainMeasure
/-! ## `HasFundamentalDomain` typeclass
We define `HasFundamentalDomain` in order to be able to define the `covolume` of a quotient of `α`
by a group `G`, which under reasonable conditions does not depend on the choice of fundamental
domain. Even though any "sensible" action should have a fundamental domain, this is a rather
delicate question which was recently addressed by Misha Kapovich: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.05325
TODO: Formalize the existence of a Dirichlet domain as in Kapovich's paper.
-/
section HasFundamentalDomain
|
/-- We say a quotient of `α` by `G` `HasAddFundamentalDomain` if there is a measurable set
`s` for which `IsAddFundamentalDomain G s` holds. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/FundamentalDomain.lean | 665 | 667 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Thickenings in pseudo-metric spaces
## Main definitions
* `Metric.thickening δ s`, the open thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric space.
* `Metric.cthickening δ s`, the closed thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric
space.
## Main results
* `Disjoint.exists_thickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint thickenings
* `Disjoint.exists_cthickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint closed thickenings
* `IsCompact.exists_cthickening_subset_open`: if `s` is compact, `t` is open and `s ⊆ t`,
some `cthickening` of `s` is contained in `t`.
* `Metric.hasBasis_nhdsSet_cthickening`: the `cthickening`s of a compact set `K` form a basis
of the neighbourhoods of `K`
* `Metric.closure_eq_iInter_cthickening'`: the closure of a set equals the intersection
of its closed thickenings of positive radii accumulating at zero.
The same holds for open thickenings.
* `IsCompact.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall`: if `s` is compact, `cthickening δ s` is the union
of `closedBall`s of radius `δ` around `x : E`.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u}
namespace Metric
section Thickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ : ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
def thickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E < ENNReal.ofReal δ }
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infEdist_lt : x ∈ thickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
(open) `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_thickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.thickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hδ.le).trans ε_lt.le
/-- The (open) thickening equals the preimage of an open interval under `EMetric.infEdist`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ E = (infEdist · E) ⁻¹' Iio (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
/-- The (open) thickening is an open set. -/
theorem isOpen_thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsOpen (thickening δ E) :=
Continuous.isOpen_preimage continuous_infEdist _ isOpen_Iio
/-- The (open) thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem thickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : thickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [thickening, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, not_top_lt]
theorem thickening_of_nonpos (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (s : Set α) : thickening δ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ => ((ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hδ).trans_le bot_le).not_lt
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a fixed subset `E` is an increasing function of
the thickening radius `δ`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem thickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iio_subset_Iio (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` with a fixed thickening radius `δ` is
an increasing function of the subset `E`. -/
theorem thickening_subset_of_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (h : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickening δ E₁ ⊆ thickening δ E₂ := fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (infEdist_anti h) hx
theorem mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt {δ : ℝ} (E : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The frontier of the (open) thickening of a set is contained in an `EMetric.infEdist` level
set. -/
theorem frontier_thickening_subset (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} :
frontier (thickening δ E) ⊆ { x : α | infEdist x E = ENNReal.ofReal δ } :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq continuous_infEdist continuous_const
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem frontier_thickening_disjoint (A : Set α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun r : ℝ => frontier (thickening r A)) := by
refine (pairwise_disjoint_on _).2 fun r₁ r₂ hr => ?_
rcases le_total r₁ 0 with h₁ | h₁
· simp [thickening_of_nonpos h₁]
refine ((disjoint_singleton.2 fun h => hr.ne ?_).preimage _).mono (frontier_thickening_subset _)
(frontier_thickening_subset _)
apply_fun ENNReal.toReal at h
rwa [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h₁, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (h₁.trans hr.le)] at h
/-- Any set is contained in the complement of the δ-thickening of the complement of its
δ-thickening. -/
lemma subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
E ⊆ (thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
intro x x_in_E
simp only [thickening, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
apply EMetric.le_infEdist.mpr fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at hy
simpa only [edist_comm] using le_trans hy <| EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem x_in_E
/-- The δ-thickening of the complement of the δ-thickening of a set is contained in the complement
of the set. -/
lemma thickening_compl_thickening_self_subset_compl (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ ⊆ Eᶜ := by
apply compl_subset_compl.mp
simpa only [compl_compl] using subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self δ E
variable {X : Type u} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt {E : Set X} {x : X} (h : E.Nonempty) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ infDist x E < δ :=
lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top h)
/-- A point in a metric space belongs to the (open) `δ`-thickening of a subset `E` if and only if
it is at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
theorem mem_thickening_iff {E : Set X} {x : X} : x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, dist x z < δ := by
have key_iff : ∀ z : X, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ ↔ dist x z < δ := fun z ↦ by
rw [dist_edist, lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _)]
simp_rw [mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt, key_iff]
@[simp]
theorem thickening_singleton (δ : ℝ) (x : X) : thickening δ ({x} : Set X) = ball x δ := by
ext
simp [mem_thickening_iff]
theorem ball_subset_thickening {x : X} {E : Set X} (hx : x ∈ E) (δ : ℝ) :
ball x δ ⊆ thickening δ E :=
Subset.trans (by simp [Subset.rfl]) (thickening_subset_of_subset δ <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a metric space equals the
union of balls of radius `δ` centered at points of `E`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_biUnion_ball {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} : thickening δ E = ⋃ x ∈ E, ball x δ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion₂, exists_prop]
exact mem_thickening_iff
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} (h : IsBounded E) :
IsBounded (thickening δ E) := by
rcases E.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· simp
· refine (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall x).2 ⟨δ + diam E, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist y x ≤ infDist y E + diam E := dist_le_infDist_add_diam (x := y) h hx
_ ≤ δ + diam E := add_le_add_right ((mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt ⟨x, hx⟩).1 hy).le _
end Thickening
section Cthickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ ε : ℝ} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The closed `δ`-thickening `Metric.cthickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at infimum distance at most `δ` from `E`. -/
def cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_cthickening_iff : x ∈ cthickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
closed `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_cthickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.cthickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [cthickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_le]
exact ((ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos).mpr hδ).trans ε_lt
theorem mem_cthickening_of_edist_le (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) (h : y ∈ E)
(h' : edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E :=
(infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h).trans h'
theorem mem_cthickening_of_dist_le {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α)
(h : y ∈ E) (h' : dist x y ≤ δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E := by
apply mem_cthickening_of_edist_le x y δ E h
rw [edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal h'
theorem cthickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ E = (fun x => infEdist x E) ⁻¹' Iic (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
/-- The closed thickening is a closed set. -/
theorem isClosed_cthickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsClosed (cthickening δ E) :=
IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Iic
/-- The closed thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : cthickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, top_le_iff]
theorem cthickening_of_nonpos {δ : ℝ} (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (E : Set α) : cthickening δ E = closure E := by
ext x
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 hδ]
/-- The closed thickening with radius zero is the closure of the set. -/
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_zero (E : Set α) : cthickening 0 E = closure E :=
cthickening_of_nonpos le_rfl E
theorem cthickening_max_zero (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : cthickening (max 0 δ) E = cthickening δ E := by
cases le_total δ 0 <;> simp [cthickening_of_nonpos, *]
/-- The closed thickening `Metric.cthickening δ E` of a fixed subset `E` is an increasing function
of the thickening radius `δ`. -/
theorem cthickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ₁ E ⊆ cthickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.mpr (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_singleton {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x : α) {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
cthickening δ ({x} : Set α) = closedBall x δ := by
ext y
simp [cthickening, edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ]
theorem closedBall_subset_cthickening_singleton {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x : α) (δ : ℝ) :
closedBall x δ ⊆ cthickening δ ({x} : Set α) := by
rcases lt_or_le δ 0 with (hδ | hδ)
· simp only [closedBall_eq_empty.mpr hδ, empty_subset]
· simp only [cthickening_singleton x hδ, Subset.rfl]
/-- The closed thickening `Metric.cthickening δ E` with a fixed thickening radius `δ` is
an increasing function of the subset `E`. -/
theorem cthickening_subset_of_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (h : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
cthickening δ E₁ ⊆ cthickening δ E₂ := fun _ hx => le_trans (infEdist_anti h) hx
theorem cthickening_subset_thickening {δ₁ : ℝ≥0} {δ₂ : ℝ} (hlt : (δ₁ : ℝ) < δ₂) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E := fun _ hx =>
hx.out.trans_lt ((ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (lt_of_le_of_lt δ₁.prop hlt)).mpr hlt)
/-- The closed thickening `Metric.cthickening δ₁ E` is contained in the open thickening
`Metric.thickening δ₂ E` if the radius of the latter is positive and larger. -/
theorem cthickening_subset_thickening' {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (δ₂_pos : 0 < δ₂) (hlt : δ₁ < δ₂) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E := fun _ hx =>
lt_of_le_of_lt hx.out ((ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff δ₂_pos).mpr hlt)
/-- The open thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` is contained in the closed thickening
`Metric.cthickening δ E` with the same radius. -/
theorem thickening_subset_cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : thickening δ E ⊆ cthickening δ E := by
intro x hx
rw [thickening, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
exact hx.le
theorem thickening_subset_cthickening_of_le {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ₁ E ⊆ cthickening δ₂ E :=
(thickening_subset_cthickening δ₁ E).trans (cthickening_mono hle E)
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.cthickening {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α}
(h : IsBounded E) : IsBounded (cthickening δ E) := by
have : IsBounded (thickening (max (δ + 1) 1) E) := h.thickening
apply this.subset
exact cthickening_subset_thickening' (zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _))
((lt_add_one _).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)) _
protected theorem _root_.IsCompact.cthickening
{α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [ProperSpace α] {s : Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) {r : ℝ} : IsCompact (cthickening r s) :=
isCompact_of_isClosed_isBounded isClosed_cthickening hs.isBounded.cthickening
theorem thickening_subset_interior_cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ E ⊆ interior (cthickening δ E) :=
(subset_interior_iff_isOpen.mpr isOpen_thickening).trans
(interior_mono (thickening_subset_cthickening δ E))
theorem closure_thickening_subset_cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
closure (thickening δ E) ⊆ cthickening δ E :=
(closure_mono (thickening_subset_cthickening δ E)).trans isClosed_cthickening.closure_subset
/-- The closed thickening of a set contains the closure of the set. -/
theorem closure_subset_cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : closure E ⊆ cthickening δ E := by
rw [← cthickening_of_nonpos (min_le_right δ 0)]
exact cthickening_mono (min_le_left δ 0) E
/-- The (open) thickening of a set contains the closure of the set. -/
theorem closure_subset_thickening {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) :
closure E ⊆ thickening δ E := by
rw [← cthickening_zero]
exact cthickening_subset_thickening' δ_pos δ_pos E
/-- A set is contained in its own (open) thickening. -/
theorem self_subset_thickening {δ : ℝ} (δ_pos : 0 < δ) (E : Set α) : E ⊆ thickening δ E :=
(@subset_closure _ _ E).trans (closure_subset_thickening δ_pos E)
/-- A set is contained in its own closed thickening. -/
theorem self_subset_cthickening {δ : ℝ} (E : Set α) : E ⊆ cthickening δ E :=
subset_closure.trans (closure_subset_cthickening δ E)
theorem thickening_mem_nhdsSet (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) : thickening δ E ∈ 𝓝ˢ E :=
isOpen_thickening.mem_nhdsSet.2 <| self_subset_thickening hδ E
theorem cthickening_mem_nhdsSet (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) : cthickening δ E ∈ 𝓝ˢ E :=
mem_of_superset (thickening_mem_nhdsSet E hδ) (thickening_subset_cthickening _ _)
@[simp]
theorem thickening_union (δ : ℝ) (s t : Set α) :
thickening δ (s ∪ t) = thickening δ s ∪ thickening δ t := by
simp_rw [thickening, infEdist_union, min_lt_iff, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_union (δ : ℝ) (s t : Set α) :
cthickening δ (s ∪ t) = cthickening δ s ∪ cthickening δ t := by
simp_rw [cthickening, infEdist_union, min_le_iff, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem thickening_iUnion (δ : ℝ) (f : ι → Set α) :
thickening δ (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, thickening δ (f i) := by
simp_rw [thickening, infEdist_iUnion, iInf_lt_iff, setOf_exists]
lemma thickening_biUnion {ι : Type*} (δ : ℝ) (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) :
thickening δ (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ I, thickening δ (f i) := by simp only [thickening_iUnion]
theorem ediam_cthickening_le (ε : ℝ≥0) :
EMetric.diam (cthickening ε s) ≤ EMetric.diam s + 2 * ε := by
refine diam_le fun x hx y hy => ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun δ hδ _ => ?_
rw [mem_cthickening_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] at hx hy
have hε : (ε : ℝ≥0∞) < ε + δ := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_add_of_pos_right _ hδ)
replace hx := hx.trans_lt hε
obtain ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩ := infEdist_lt_iff.mp hx
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x x' + edist y x' := edist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ ε + δ + (infEdist y s + EMetric.diam s) :=
add_le_add hxx'.le (edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam hx')
_ ≤ ε + δ + (ε + EMetric.diam s) := add_le_add_left (add_le_add_right hy _) _
_ = _ := by rw [two_mul]; ac_rfl
theorem ediam_thickening_le (ε : ℝ≥0) : EMetric.diam (thickening ε s) ≤ EMetric.diam s + 2 * ε :=
(EMetric.diam_mono <| thickening_subset_cthickening _ _).trans <| ediam_cthickening_le _
theorem diam_cthickening_le {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (s : Set α) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
diam (cthickening ε s) ≤ diam s + 2 * ε := by
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using hε
refine (toReal_le_add' (ediam_cthickening_le _) ?_ ?_).trans_eq ?_
· exact fun h ↦ top_unique <| h ▸ EMetric.diam_mono (self_subset_cthickening _)
· simp [mul_eq_top]
· simp [diam]
theorem diam_thickening_le {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (s : Set α) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
diam (thickening ε s) ≤ diam s + 2 * ε := by
by_cases hs : IsBounded s
· exact (diam_mono (thickening_subset_cthickening _ _) hs.cthickening).trans
(diam_cthickening_le _ hε)
obtain rfl | hε := hε.eq_or_lt
· simp [thickening_of_nonpos, diam_nonneg]
· rw [diam_eq_zero_of_unbounded (mt (IsBounded.subset · <| self_subset_thickening hε _) hs)]
positivity
@[simp]
theorem thickening_closure : thickening δ (closure s) = thickening δ s := by
simp_rw [thickening, infEdist_closure]
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_closure : cthickening δ (closure s) = cthickening δ s := by
simp_rw [cthickening, infEdist_closure]
open ENNReal
theorem _root_.Disjoint.exists_thickenings (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsCompact s)
(ht : IsClosed t) :
∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ Disjoint (thickening δ s) (thickening δ t) := by
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := exists_pos_forall_lt_edist hs ht hst
refine ⟨r / 2, half_pos (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hr), ?_⟩
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro z ⟨hzs, hzt⟩
rw [mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt] at hzs hzt
rw [← NNReal.coe_two, ← NNReal.coe_div, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal] at hzs hzt
obtain ⟨x, hx, hzx⟩ := hzs
obtain ⟨y, hy, hzy⟩ := hzt
refine (h x hx y hy).not_le ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist z x + edist z y := edist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ↑(r / 2) + ↑(r / 2) := add_le_add hzx.le hzy.le
_ = r := by rw [← ENNReal.coe_add, add_halves]
theorem _root_.Disjoint.exists_cthickenings (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsCompact s)
(ht : IsClosed t) :
∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ Disjoint (cthickening δ s) (cthickening δ t) := by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, h⟩ := hst.exists_thickenings hs ht
refine ⟨δ / 2, half_pos hδ, h.mono ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
exact cthickening_subset_thickening' hδ (half_lt_self hδ) _
/-- If `s` is compact, `t` is open and `s ⊆ t`, some `cthickening` of `s` is contained in `t`. -/
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_cthickening_subset_open (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) :
∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ cthickening δ s ⊆ t :=
(hst.disjoint_compl_right.exists_cthickenings hs ht.isClosed_compl).imp fun _ h =>
⟨h.1, disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset.1 <| h.2.mono_right <| self_subset_cthickening _⟩
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_isCompact_cthickening [LocallyCompactSpace α] (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ IsCompact (cthickening δ s) := by
rcases exists_compact_superset hs with ⟨K, K_compact, hK⟩
rcases hs.exists_cthickening_subset_open isOpen_interior hK with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩
refine ⟨δ, δpos, ?_⟩
exact K_compact.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_cthickening (hδ.trans interior_subset)
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_thickening_subset_open (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∃ δ, 0 < δ ∧ thickening δ s ⊆ t :=
let ⟨δ, h₀, hδ⟩ := hs.exists_cthickening_subset_open ht hst
| ⟨δ, h₀, (thickening_subset_cthickening _ _).trans hδ⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Thickening.lean | 424 | 425 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Order-closed topologies
In this file we introduce 3 typeclass mixins that relate topology and order structures:
- `ClosedIicTopology` says that all the intervals $(-∞, a]$ (formally, `Set.Iic a`)
are closed sets;
- `ClosedIciTopology` says that all the intervals $[a, +∞)$ (formally, `Set.Ici a`)
are closed sets;
- `OrderClosedTopology` says that the set of points `(x, y)` such that `x ≤ y`
is closed in the product topology.
The last predicate implies the first two.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts.
For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `ClosedIciTopology` vs `ClosedIicTopology,
`Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `isOpen_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `isOpen_Iio`, `isOpen_Ioi`, `isOpen_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `isClosed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `isClosed_Iic`, `isClosed_Ici`, `isClosed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a`); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `sSup` and `sInf`
* `Continuous.min`, `Continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `Tendsto.min`, `Tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
-/
open Set Filter
open OrderDual (toDual)
open scoped Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIicTopology α` means that `Iic a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIicTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `(-∞, a]` is closed. -/
isClosed_Iic (a : α) : IsClosed (Iic a)
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIciTopology α` means that `Ici a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIciTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `[a, +∞)` is closed. -/
isClosed_Ici (a : α) : IsClosed (Ici a)
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class OrderClosedTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The set `{ (x, y) | x ≤ y }` is a closed set. -/
isClosed_le' : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 }
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : FirstCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
theorem Dense.orderDual [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) :
Dense (OrderDual.ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
hs
section General
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] {s : Set α}
protected lemma BddAbove.of_closure : BddAbove (closure s) → BddAbove s :=
BddAbove.mono subset_closure
protected lemma BddBelow.of_closure : BddBelow (closure s) → BddBelow s :=
BddBelow.mono subset_closure
end General
section ClosedIicTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Iic : IsClosed (Iic a) :=
ClosedIicTopology.isClosed_Iic a
instance : ClosedIciTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_Iic (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
isClosed_Iic.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem le_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem le_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_closure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (closure s : Set α) = upperBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic, isClosed_Iic.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_closure : BddAbove (closure s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp_rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddAbove.closure⟩ := bddAbove_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot ↔ ¬IsBot a := by
constructor
· intro hd hbot
rw [hbot.atBot_eq, disjoint_principal_right] at hd
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hd le_rfl
· simp only [IsBot, not_forall]
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot b)
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hb
theorem IsLUB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsLUB (range f) a :=
⟨forall_mem_range.mpr hle, fun _c hc ↦ le_of_tendsto' hlim fun i ↦ hc <| mem_range_self i⟩
end Preorder
section NoBotOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot := by simp
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atBot (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atBot = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atBot_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atBot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a)
end NoBotOrder
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot F]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (hlim : Filter.Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨆ i, f i = a :=
have := F.nonempty_of_neBot
(IsLUB.range_of_tendsto hle hlim).ciSup_eq
theorem iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, f i < a) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Iic (f i) = Iio a := by
have obs : a ∉ range f := by
rw [mem_range]
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact (hlt i).false
rw [← biUnion_range, (IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (le_of_lt <| hlt ·) hlim).biUnion_Iic_eq_Iio obs]
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Ioi : IsOpen (Ioi a) := by
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
isOpen_Ioi.interior_eq
theorem Ioi_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b := IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioi h
theorem eventually_gt_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b < x := Ioi_mem_nhds hab
theorem Ici_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ici a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_nhds h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem eventually_ge_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b ≤ x := Ici_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u < f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_gt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_gt_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u ≤ f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_ge_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le
protected theorem Dense.exists_gt [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x < y :=
hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi (exists_gt x)
protected theorem Dense.exists_ge [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(hs.exists_gt x).imp fun _ h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩
theorem Dense.exists_ge' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (htop : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := by
by_cases hx : IsTop x
· exact ⟨x, htop x hx, le_rfl⟩
· simp only [IsTop, not_forall, not_le] at hx
rcases hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi hx with ⟨y, hys, hy : x < y⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, hy.le⟩
/-!
### Left neighborhoods on a `ClosedIicTopology`
Limits to the left of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to the left,
either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[<] a` and `𝓝[≤] a`.
Here we prove that all left-neighborhoods of a point are equal,
and we prove other useful characterizations which require the stronger hypothesis `OrderTopology α`
in another file.
-/
/-!
#### Point excluded
-/
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := by
simpa only [← Iio_inter_Ioi] using inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (Ioi_mem_nhds H)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT H.1) <| Ioo_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLT (h : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[<] b = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| h.Ioo_eq ▸ Ioo_mem_nhdsLT h.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iio := CovBy.nhdsLT
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLT [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ := by
if h : IsMin a then simp [h.Iio_eq]
else exact (Order.pred_covBy_of_not_isMin h).nhdsLT
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iio := PredOrder.nhdsLT
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGT_eq_nhdsNE [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[>] a = 𝓝[≠] a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGT, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[≥] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGE, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ico_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Icc_mem_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ico a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioo a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ico_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ico a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioo_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioo a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT h]
/-!
#### Point included
-/
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLE (H : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, H.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iic := CovBy.nhdsLE
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLE [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, PredOrder.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iic := PredOrder.nhdsLE
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
inter_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds H) self_mem_nhdsWithin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioo_right H.2
|
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/OrderClosed.lean | 358 | 360 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Module
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Real
/-!
# Normed space structure on `ℂ`.
This file gathers basic facts of analytic nature on the complex numbers.
## Main results
This file registers `ℂ` as a normed field, expresses basic properties of the norm, and gives tools
on the real vector space structure of `ℂ`. Notably, it defines the following functions in the
namespace `Complex`.
|Name |Type |Description |
|------------------|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|`equivRealProdCLM`|ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℝ × ℝ|The natural `ContinuousLinearEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ` |
|`reCLM` |ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ |Real part function as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`imCLM` |ℂ →L[ℝ] ℝ |Imaginary part function as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`ofRealCLM` |ℝ →L[ℝ] ℂ |Embedding of the reals as a `ContinuousLinearMap` |
|`ofRealLI` |ℝ →ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ |Embedding of the reals as a `LinearIsometry` |
|`conjCLE` |ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℂ |Complex conjugation as a `ContinuousLinearEquiv` |
|`conjLIE` |ℂ ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ |Complex conjugation as a `LinearIsometryEquiv` |
We also register the fact that `ℂ` is an `RCLike` field.
-/
assert_not_exists Absorbs
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
variable {z : ℂ}
open ComplexConjugate Topology Filter
instance : NormedField ℂ where
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
norm_mul := Complex.norm_mul
instance : DenselyNormedField ℂ where
lt_norm_lt r₁ r₂ h₀ hr :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := exists_between hr
⟨x, by rwa [norm_real, Real.norm_of_nonneg (h₀.trans_lt h.1).le]⟩
instance {R : Type*} [NormedField R] [NormedAlgebra R ℝ] : NormedAlgebra R ℂ where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul ℝ r x, real_smul, norm_mul, norm_real, norm_algebraMap']
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The module structure from `Module.complexToReal` is a normed space. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedSpace.complexToReal : NormedSpace ℝ E :=
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ E
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- The algebra structure from `Algebra.complexToReal` is a normed algebra. -/
instance (priority := 900) _root_.NormedAlgebra.complexToReal {A : Type*} [SeminormedRing A]
[NormedAlgebra ℂ A] : NormedAlgebra ℝ A :=
NormedAlgebra.restrictScalars ℝ ℂ A
-- This result cannot be moved to `Data/Complex/Norm` since `ℤ` gets its norm from its
-- normed ring structure and that file does not know about rings
@[simp 1100, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_intCast (n : ℤ) : ‖(n : ℂ)‖₊ = ‖n‖₊ := by
ext; exact norm_intCast n
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias comap_abs_nhds_zero := comap_norm_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias continuous_abs := continuous_norm
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_normSq : Continuous normSq := by
simpa [← Complex.normSq_eq_norm_sq] using continuous_norm (E := ℂ).pow 2
theorem nnnorm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one {ζ : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h : ζ ^ n = 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ‖ζ‖₊ = 1 :=
(pow_left_inj₀ zero_le' zero_le' hn).1 <| by rw [← nnnorm_pow, h, nnnorm_one, one_pow]
theorem norm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one {ζ : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (h : ζ ^ n = 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ‖ζ‖ = 1 :=
congr_arg Subtype.val (nnnorm_eq_one_of_pow_eq_one h hn)
lemma le_of_eq_sum_of_eq_sum_norm {ι : Type*} {a b : ℝ} (f : ι → ℂ) (s : Finset ι) (ha₀ : 0 ≤ a)
(ha : a = ∑ i ∈ s, f i) (hb : b = ∑ i ∈ s, (‖f i‖ : ℂ)) : a ≤ b := by
norm_cast at hb; rw [← Complex.norm_of_nonneg ha₀, ha, hb]; exact norm_sum_le s f
theorem equivRealProd_apply_le (z : ℂ) : ‖equivRealProd z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ := by
simp [Prod.norm_def, abs_re_le_norm, abs_im_le_norm]
theorem equivRealProd_apply_le' (z : ℂ) : ‖equivRealProd z‖ ≤ 1 * ‖z‖ := by
simpa using equivRealProd_apply_le z
theorem lipschitz_equivRealProd : LipschitzWith 1 equivRealProd := by
simpa using AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound equivRealProdLm 1 equivRealProd_apply_le'
theorem antilipschitz_equivRealProd : AntilipschitzWith (NNReal.sqrt 2) equivRealProd :=
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound equivRealProdLm fun z ↦ by
simpa only [Real.coe_sqrt, NNReal.coe_ofNat] using norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max z
theorem isUniformEmbedding_equivRealProd : IsUniformEmbedding equivRealProd :=
antilipschitz_equivRealProd.isUniformEmbedding lipschitz_equivRealProd.uniformContinuous
instance : CompleteSpace ℂ :=
(completeSpace_congr isUniformEmbedding_equivRealProd).mpr inferInstance
instance instT2Space : T2Space ℂ := TopologicalSpace.t2Space_of_metrizableSpace
/-- The natural `ContinuousLinearEquiv` from `ℂ` to `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs apply symm_apply_re symm_apply_im]
def equivRealProdCLM : ℂ ≃L[ℝ] ℝ × ℝ :=
equivRealProdLm.toContinuousLinearEquivOfBounds 1 (√2) equivRealProd_apply_le' fun p =>
norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max (equivRealProd.symm p)
theorem equivRealProdCLM_symm_apply (p : ℝ × ℝ) :
Complex.equivRealProdCLM.symm p = p.1 + p.2 * Complex.I := Complex.equivRealProd_symm_apply p
instance : ProperSpace ℂ := lipschitz_equivRealProd.properSpace
equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.isProperMap
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias tendsto_abs_cocompact_atTop :=
tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
/-- The `normSq` function on `ℂ` is proper. -/
| theorem tendsto_normSq_cocompact_atTop : Tendsto normSq (cocompact ℂ) atTop := by
simpa [norm_mul_self_eq_normSq]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean | 136 | 137 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.BalancedCoreHull
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Von Neumann Boundedness
This file defines natural or von Neumann bounded sets and proves elementary properties.
## Main declarations
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded`: A set `s` is von Neumann-bounded if every neighborhood of zero
absorbs `s`.
* `Bornology.vonNBornology`: The bornology made of the von Neumann-bounded sets.
## Main results
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.of_topologicalSpace_le`: A coarser topology admits more
von Neumann-bounded sets.
* `Bornology.IsVonNBounded.image`: A continuous linear image of a bounded set is bounded.
* `Bornology.isVonNBounded_iff_smul_tendsto_zero`: Given any sequence `ε` of scalars which tends
to `𝓝[≠] 0`, we have that a set `S` is bounded if and only if for any sequence `x : ℕ → S`,
`ε • x` tends to 0. This shows that bounded sets are completely determined by sequences, which is
the key fact for proving that sequential continuity implies continuity for linear maps defined on
a bornological space
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
-/
variable {𝕜 𝕜' E F ι : Type*}
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Topology Pointwise
namespace Bornology
section SeminormedRing
section Zero
variable (𝕜)
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Zero E]
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- A set `s` is von Neumann bounded if every neighborhood of 0 absorbs `s`. -/
def IsVonNBounded (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃V⦄, V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) → Absorbs 𝕜 V s
variable (E)
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_empty : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ _ => Absorbs.empty
variable {𝕜 E}
theorem isVonNBounded_iff (s : Set E) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E), Absorbs 𝕜 V s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem _root_.Filter.HasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff {q : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set E} {A : Set E}
(h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis q s) : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 A ↔ ∀ i, q i → Absorbs 𝕜 (s i) A := by
refine ⟨fun hA i hi => hA (h.mem_of_mem hi), fun hA V hV => ?_⟩
rcases h.mem_iff.mp hV with ⟨i, hi, hV⟩
exact (hA i hi).mono_left hV
/-- Subsets of bounded sets are bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.subset {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁ := fun _ hV => (hs₂ hV).mono_right h
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_union {s t : Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s ∪ t) ↔ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ∧ IsVonNBounded 𝕜 t := by
simp only [IsVonNBounded, absorbs_union, forall_and]
/-- The union of two bounded sets is bounded. -/
theorem IsVonNBounded.union {s₁ s₂ : Set E} (hs₁ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₁) (hs₂ : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s₂) :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s₁ ∪ s₂) := isVonNBounded_union.2 ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_boundedSpace [BoundedSpace 𝕜] {s : Set E} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s := fun _ _ ↦
.of_boundedSpace
@[nontriviality]
theorem IsVonNBounded.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] {s : Set E} : IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s :=
fun U hU ↦ .of_forall fun c ↦ calc
s ⊆ univ := subset_univ s
_ = c • U := .symm <| Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty <| (Filter.nonempty_of_mem hU).image _
@[simp]
theorem isVonNBounded_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set E} :
IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s i) := by
simp only [IsVonNBounded, absorbs_iUnion, @forall_swap ι]
theorem isVonNBounded_biUnion {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set E} :
| IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (s i) := by
have _ := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, isVonNBounded_iUnion, Subtype.forall]
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Bounded.lean | 109 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.PiTensorProduct.ProjectiveSeminorm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
/-!
# Injective seminorm on the tensor of a finite family of normed spaces.
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field and `E` be a family of normed `𝕜`-vector spaces `Eᵢ`,
indexed by a finite type `ι`. We define a seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which we call the
"injective seminorm". It is chosen to satisfy the following property: for every
normed `𝕜`-vector space `F`, the linear equivalence
`MultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →ₗ[𝕜] F`
expressing the universal property of the tensor product induces an isometric linear equivalence
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`.
The idea is the following: Every normed `𝕜`-vector space `F` defines a linear map
from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →ₗ[𝕜] F`, which sends `x` to the map
`f ↦ f.lift x`. Thanks to `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`, this map lands in
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F`. As this last space has a natural operator (semi)norm,
we get an induced seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, which, by
`PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm`, is bounded above by the projective seminorm
`PiTensorProduct.projectiveSeminorm`. We then take the `sup` of these seminorms as `F` varies;
as this family of seminorms is bounded, its `sup` has good properties.
In fact, we cannot take the `sup` over all normed spaces `F` because of set-theoretical issues,
so we only take spaces `F` in the same universe as `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`. We prove in
`norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm` that this gives the same result, because every multilinear map
from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to `F` factors though a normed vector space in the same universe as
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
We then prove the universal property and the functoriality of `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` as a normed vector
space.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct.toDualContinuousMultilinearMap`: The `𝕜`-linear map from
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F` sending `x` to the map
`f ↦ f x`.
* `PiTensorProduct.injectiveSeminorm`: The injective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.liftEquiv`: The bijection between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F`
and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`, as a continuous linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.liftIsometry`: The bijection between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F`
and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`, as an isometric linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.tprodL`: The canonical continuous multilinear map from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ`
to `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapL`: The continuous linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `⨂[𝕜] i, E'ᵢ`
induced by a family of continuous linear maps `Eᵢ →L[𝕜] E'ᵢ`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapLMultilinear`: The continuous multilinear map from
`Πᵢ (Eᵢ →L[𝕜] E'ᵢ)` to `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E'ᵢ)` sending a family
`f` to `PiTensorProduct.mapL f`.
## Main results
* `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm`: The main property of the injective seminorm
on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`: for every `x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` and every continuous multilinear map `f` from
`E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to a normed space `F`, we have `‖f.lift x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * injectiveSeminorm x `.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapL_opNorm`: If `f` is a family of continuous linear maps
`fᵢ : Eᵢ →L[𝕜] Fᵢ`, then `‖PiTensorProduct.mapL f‖ ≤ ∏ i, ‖fᵢ‖`.
* `PiTensorProduct.mapLMultilinear_opNorm` : If `F` is a normed vecteor space, then
`‖mapLMultilinear 𝕜 E F‖ ≤ 1`.
## TODO
* If all `Eᵢ` are separated and satisfy `SeparatingDual`, then the seminorm on
`⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` is a norm. This uses the construction of a basis of the `PiTensorProduct`, hence
depends on PR https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11156. It should probably go in a separate file.
* Adapt the remaining functoriality constructions/properties from `PiTensorProduct`.
-/
universe uι u𝕜 uE uF
variable {ι : Type uι} [Fintype ι]
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : ι → Type uE} [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
variable {F : Type uF} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section seminorm
variable (F) in
/-- The linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F` sending
`x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to the map `f ↦ f.lift x`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def toDualContinuousMultilinearMap : (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →ₗ[𝕜]
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F →L[𝕜] F where
toFun x := LinearMap.mkContinuous
((LinearMap.flip (lift (R := 𝕜) (s := E) (E := F)).toLinearMap x) ∘ₗ
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear)
(projectiveSeminorm x)
(fun _ ↦ by simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.flip_apply,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
exact norm_eval_le_projectiveSeminorm _ _ _)
map_add' x y := by
ext _
simp only [map_add, LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.flip_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' a x := by
ext _
simp only [map_smul, LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply,
LinearMap.flip_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, RingHom.id_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul',
Pi.smul_apply]
theorem toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
‖toDualContinuousMultilinearMap F x‖ ≤ projectiveSeminorm x := by
simp only [toDualContinuousMultilinearMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk]
apply LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (apply_nonneg _ _)
/-- The injective seminorm on `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`. Morally, it sends `x` in `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ` to the
`sup` of the operator norms of the `PiTensorProduct.toDualContinuousMultilinearMap F x`, for all
normed vector spaces `F`. In fact, we only take in the same universe as `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`, and then
prove in `PiTensorProduct.norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm` that this gives the same result.
-/
noncomputable irreducible_def injectiveSeminorm : Seminorm 𝕜 (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :=
sSup {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)) (_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G)
(_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G), p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))}
lemma dualSeminorms_bounded : BddAbove {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE))
(_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G) (_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G),
p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))} := by
existsi projectiveSeminorm
rw [mem_upperBounds]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, forall_exists_index]
intro p G _ _ hp
rw [hp]
intro x
simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
exact toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_apply (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
injectiveSeminorm x = ⨆ p : {p | ∃ (G : Type (max uι u𝕜 uE))
(_ : SeminormedAddCommGroup G) (_ : NormedSpace 𝕜 G), p = Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜
(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E))}, p.1 x := by
simpa only [injectiveSeminorm, Set.coe_setOf, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
using Seminorm.sSup_apply dualSeminorms_bounded
theorem norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
‖lift f.toMultilinearMap x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * injectiveSeminorm x := by
/- If `F` were in `Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)` (which is the type of `⨂[𝕜] i, E i`), then the
property that we want to prove would hold by definition of `injectiveSeminorm`. This is
not necessarily true, but we will show that there exists a normed vector space `G` in
`Type (max uι u𝕜 uE)` and an injective isometry from `G` to `F` such that `f` factors
through a continuous multilinear map `f'` from `E = Π i, E i` to `G`, to which we can apply
the definition of `injectiveSeminorm`. The desired inequality for `f` then follows
immediately.
The idea is very simple: the multilinear map `f` corresponds by `PiTensorProduct.lift`
to a linear map from `⨂[𝕜] i, E i` to `F`, say `l`. We want to take `G` to be the image of
`l`, with the norm induced from that of `F`; to make sure that we are in the correct universe,
it is actually more convenient to take `G` equal to the coimage of `l` (i.e. the quotient
of `⨂[𝕜] i, E i` by the kernel of `l`), which is canonically isomorphic to its image by
`LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange`. -/
set G := (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) ⧸ LinearMap.ker (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
set G' := LinearMap.range (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
set e := LinearMap.quotKerEquivRange (lift f.toMultilinearMap)
letI := SeminormedAddCommGroup.induced G G' e
letI := NormedSpace.induced 𝕜 G G' e
set f'₀ := lift.symm (e.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ LinearMap.rangeRestrict (lift f.toMultilinearMap))
have hf'₀ : ∀ (x : Π (i : ι), E i), ‖f'₀ x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := fun x ↦ by
change ‖e (f'₀ x)‖ ≤ _
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Submodule.coe_norm,
LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe, e, f'₀]
exact f.le_opNorm x
set f' := MultilinearMap.mkContinuous f'₀ ‖f‖ hf'₀
have hnorm : ‖f'‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := (f'.opNorm_le_iff (norm_nonneg f)).mpr hf'₀
have heq : e (lift f'.toMultilinearMap x) = lift f.toMultilinearMap x := by
induction x using PiTensorProduct.induction_on with
| smul_tprod =>
simp only [lift_symm, map_smul, lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe,
MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, SetLike.val_smul,
LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, f', f'₀]
| add _ _ hx hy => simp only [map_add, Submodule.coe_add, hx, hy]
suffices h : ‖lift f'.toMultilinearMap x‖ ≤ ‖f'‖ * injectiveSeminorm x by
change ‖(e (lift f'.toMultilinearMap x)).1‖ ≤ _ at h
rw [heq] at h
exact le_trans h (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hnorm (apply_nonneg _ _))
have hle : Seminorm.comp (normSeminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] G))
(toDualContinuousMultilinearMap G (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E)) ≤ injectiveSeminorm := by
simp only [injectiveSeminorm]
refine le_csSup dualSeminorms_bounded ?_
rw [Set.mem_setOf]
existsi G, inferInstance, inferInstance
rfl
refine le_trans ?_ (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hle x) (norm_nonneg f'))
simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm, ← toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_apply_apply]
rw [mul_comm]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_le_projectiveSeminorm :
injectiveSeminorm (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) ≤ projectiveSeminorm := by
rw [injectiveSeminorm]
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· existsi 0
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
existsi PUnit, inferInstance, inferInstance
ext x
simp only [Seminorm.zero_apply, Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
rw [Subsingleton.elim (toDualContinuousMultilinearMap PUnit x) 0, norm_zero]
· intro p hp
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hp
obtain ⟨G, _, _, h⟩ := hp
rw [h]; intro x; simp only [Seminorm.comp_apply, coe_normSeminorm]
exact toDualContinuousMultilinearMap_le_projectiveSeminorm _
theorem injectiveSeminorm_tprod_le (m : Π (i : ι), E i) :
injectiveSeminorm (⨂ₜ[𝕜] i, m i) ≤ ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
le_trans (injectiveSeminorm_le_projectiveSeminorm _) (projectiveSeminorm_tprod_le m)
noncomputable instance : SeminormedAddCommGroup (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :=
AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup injectiveSeminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
noncomputable instance : NormedSpace 𝕜 (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) where
norm_smul_le a x := by
change injectiveSeminorm.toFun (a • x) ≤ _
rw [injectiveSeminorm.smul']
rfl
variable (𝕜 E F)
/-- The linear equivalence between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F` and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`
induced by `PiTensorProduct.lift`, for every normed space `F`.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def liftEquiv : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →L[𝕜] F where
toFun f := LinearMap.mkContinuous (lift f.toMultilinearMap) ‖f‖
(fun x ↦ norm_eval_le_injectiveSeminorm f x)
map_add' f g := by ext _; simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap_add, map_add,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' a f := by ext _; simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap_smul, map_smul,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', Pi.smul_apply]
invFun l := MultilinearMap.mkContinuous (lift.symm l.toLinearMap) ‖l‖ (fun x ↦ by
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
refine le_trans (ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_
(norm_nonneg l))
exact injectiveSeminorm_tprod_le x)
left_inv f := by ext x; simp only [LinearMap.mkContinuous_coe, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe]
right_inv l := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.coe_inj]
apply PiTensorProduct.ext; ext m
simp only [lift_symm, LinearMap.mkContinuous_coe, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply,
lift.tprod, ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe, MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
/-- For a normed space `F`, we have constructed in `PiTensorProduct.liftEquiv` the canonical
linear equivalence between `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F` and `(⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ) →L[𝕜] F`
(induced by `PiTensorProduct.lift`). Here we give the upgrade of this equivalence to
an isometric linear equivalence; in particular, it is a continuous linear equivalence.
-/
noncomputable def liftIsometry : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →L[𝕜] F :=
{ liftEquiv 𝕜 E F with
norm_map' := by
intro f
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simp only [liftEquiv, lift_symm, LinearEquiv.coe_mk]
exact LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg f) _
· conv_lhs => rw [← (liftEquiv 𝕜 E F).left_inv f]
simp only [liftEquiv, lift_symm, AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, AddHom.coe_mk,
LinearEquiv.invFun_eq_symm, LinearEquiv.coe_symm_mk, LinearMap.mkContinuous_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_mk]
exact MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _ }
variable {𝕜 E F}
@[simp]
theorem liftIsometry_apply_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (x : ⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :
liftIsometry 𝕜 E F f x = lift f.toMultilinearMap x := by
simp only [liftIsometry, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_mk, liftEquiv_apply,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply]
variable (𝕜) in
/-- The canonical continuous multilinear map from `E = Πᵢ Eᵢ` to `⨂[𝕜] i, Eᵢ`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def tprodL : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) :=
(liftIsometry 𝕜 E _).symm (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 _)
@[simp]
theorem tprodL_coe : (tprodL 𝕜).toMultilinearMap = tprod 𝕜 (s := E) := by
ext m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_coe, tprodL_toFun]
|
@[simp]
theorem liftIsometry_symm_apply (l : (⨂[𝕜] i, E i) →L[𝕜] F) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/PiTensorProduct/InjectiveSeminorm.lean | 299 | 301 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Linear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Chain homotopies
We define chain homotopies, and prove that homotopic chain maps induce the same map on homology.
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Category Limits HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [Preadditive V]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} {C D E : HomologicalComplex V c}
variable (f g : C ⟶ D) (h k : D ⟶ E) (i : ι)
section
/-- The composition of `C.d i (c.next i) ≫ f (c.next i) i`. -/
def dNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => C.d i (c.next i) ≫ f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
/-- `f (c.next i) i`. -/
def fromNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.xNext i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) :
dNext i f = C.dFrom i ≫ fromNext i f :=
rfl
theorem dNext_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {i i' : ι} (w : c.Rel i i') :
dNext i f = C.d i i' ≫ f i' i := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
rfl
lemma dNext_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
dNext i f = 0 := by
dsimp [dNext]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, zero_comp]
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem dNext_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f i ≫ dNext i g :=
(f.comm_assoc _ _ _).symm
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem dNext_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = dNext i f ≫ g.f i :=
(assoc _ _ _).symm
/-- The composition `f j (c.prev j) ≫ D.d (c.prev j) j`. -/
def prevD (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.X j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j) ≫ D.d (c.prev j) j) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
lemma prevD_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel (c.prev i) i) :
prevD i f = 0 := by
dsimp [prevD]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, comp_zero]
/-- `f j (c.prev j)`. -/
def toPrev (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.xPrev j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j)) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (j : ι) :
prevD j f = toPrev j f ≫ D.dTo j :=
rfl
theorem prevD_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {j j' : ι} (w : c.Rel j' j) :
prevD j f = f j j' ≫ D.d j' j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
rfl
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem prevD_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f j ≫ prevD j g :=
assoc _ _ _
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem prevD_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = prevD j f ≫ g.f j := by
dsimp [prevD]
simp only [assoc, g.comm]
theorem dNext_nat (C D : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
dNext i f = C.d i (i - 1) ≫ f (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [dNext]
cases i
· simp only [shape, ChainComplex.next_nat_zero, ComplexShape.down_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, zero_comp, reduceCtorEq]
· congr <;> simp
theorem prevD_nat (C D : CochainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
prevD i f = f i (i - 1) ≫ D.d (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [prevD]
cases i
· simp only [shape, CochainComplex.prev_nat_zero, ComplexShape.up_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, comp_zero, reduceCtorEq]
· congr <;> simp
/-- A homotopy `h` between chain maps `f` and `g` consists of components `h i j : C.X i ⟶ D.X j`
which are zero unless `c.Rel j i`, satisfying the homotopy condition.
-/
@[ext]
structure Homotopy (f g : C ⟶ D) where
hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j
zero : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel j i → hom i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
comm : ∀ i, f.f i = dNext i hom + prevD i hom + g.f i := by aesop_cat
variable {f g}
namespace Homotopy
/-- `f` is homotopic to `g` iff `f - g` is homotopic to `0`.
-/
def equivSubZero : Homotopy f g ≃ Homotopy (f - g) 0 where
toFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun _ _ w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simp [h.comm] }
invFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun _ _ w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simpa [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] using h.comm i }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
/-- Equal chain maps are homotopic. -/
@[simps]
def ofEq (h : f = g) : Homotopy f g where
hom := 0
zero _ _ _ := rfl
/-- Every chain map is homotopic to itself. -/
@[simps!, refl]
def refl (f : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy f f :=
ofEq (rfl : f = f)
/-- `f` is homotopic to `g` iff `g` is homotopic to `f`. -/
@[simps!, symm]
def symm {f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy g f where
hom := -h.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.neg_apply, h.zero i j w, neg_zero]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_neg, AddMonoidHom.map_neg, h.comm, ← neg_add, ← add_assoc, neg_add_cancel,
zero_add]
/-- homotopy is a transitive relation. -/
@[simps!, trans]
def trans {e f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (k : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy e g where
hom := h.hom + k.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h.zero i j w, k.zero i j w, zero_add]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, AddMonoidHom.map_add, h.comm, k.comm]
abel
/-- the sum of two homotopies is a homotopy between the sum of the respective morphisms. -/
@[simps!]
def add {f₁ g₁ f₂ g₂ : C ⟶ D} (h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) :
Homotopy (f₁ + f₂) (g₁ + g₂) where
hom := h₁.hom + h₂.hom
zero i j hij := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h₁.zero i j hij, h₂.zero i j hij, add_zero]
comm i := by
simp only [HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, h₁.comm, h₂.comm, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
abel
/-- the scalar multiplication of an homotopy -/
@[simps!]
def smul {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Linear R V] (h : Homotopy f g) (a : R) :
Homotopy (a • f) (a • g) where
hom i j := a • h.hom i j
zero i j hij := by
rw [h.zero i j hij, smul_zero]
comm i := by
dsimp
rw [h.comm]
dsimp [fromNext, toPrev]
simp only [smul_add, Linear.comp_smul, Linear.smul_comp]
/-- homotopy is closed under composition (on the right) -/
@[simps]
def compRight {e f : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (g : D ⟶ E) : Homotopy (e ≫ g) (f ≫ g) where
hom i j := h.hom i j ≫ g.f j
zero i j w := by rw [h.zero i j w, zero_comp]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_right, prevD_comp_right, Preadditive.add_comp,
comp_f, Preadditive.add_comp]
/-- homotopy is closed under composition (on the left) -/
@[simps]
def compLeft {f g : D ⟶ E} (h : Homotopy f g) (e : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (e ≫ f) (e ≫ g) where
hom i j := e.f i ≫ h.hom i j
zero i j w := by rw [h.zero i j w, comp_zero]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_left, prevD_comp_left, comp_f,
Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.comp_add]
/-- homotopy is closed under composition -/
@[simps!]
def comp {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} {f₁ g₁ : C₁ ⟶ C₂} {f₂ g₂ : C₂ ⟶ C₃}
(h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) : Homotopy (f₁ ≫ f₂) (g₁ ≫ g₂) :=
(h₁.compRight _).trans (h₂.compLeft _)
/-- a variant of `Homotopy.compRight` useful for dealing with homotopy equivalences. -/
@[simps!]
def compRightId {f : C ⟶ C} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 C)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (f ≫ g) g :=
(h.compRight g).trans (ofEq <| id_comp _)
/-- a variant of `Homotopy.compLeft` useful for dealing with homotopy equivalences. -/
@[simps!]
def compLeftId {f : D ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 D)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (g ≫ f) g :=
(h.compLeft g).trans (ofEq <| comp_id _)
/-!
Null homotopic maps can be constructed using the formula `hd+dh`. We show that
these morphisms are homotopic to `0` and provide some convenient simplification
lemmas that give a degreewise description of `hd+dh`, depending on whether we have
two differentials going to and from a certain degree, only one, or none.
-/
/-- The null homotopic map associated to a family `hom` of morphisms `C_i ⟶ D_j`.
This is the same datum as for the field `hom` in the structure `Homotopy`. For
this definition, we do not need the field `zero` of that structure
as this definition uses only the maps `C_i ⟶ C_j` when `c.Rel j i`. -/
def nullHomotopicMap (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) : C ⟶ D where
f i := dNext i hom + prevD i hom
comm' i j hij := by
have eq1 : prevD i hom ≫ D.d i j = 0 := by
simp only [prevD, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
have eq2 : C.d i j ≫ dNext j hom = 0 := by
simp only [dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]
rw [dNext_eq hom hij, prevD_eq hom hij, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp, eq1, eq2,
add_zero, zero_add, assoc]
open Classical in
/-- Variant of `nullHomotopicMap` where the input consists only of the
relevant maps `C_i ⟶ D_j` such that `c.Rel j i`. -/
def nullHomotopicMap' (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) : C ⟶ D :=
nullHomotopicMap fun i j => dite (c.Rel j i) (h i j) fun _ => 0
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap` with the postcomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
theorem nullHomotopicMap_comp (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => hom i j ≫ g.f j := by
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.add_comp, assoc, g.comm]
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap'` with the postcomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_comp (hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap' hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => hom i j hij ≫ g.f j := by
ext n
rw [nullHomotopicMap', nullHomotopicMap_comp]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [zero_comp]
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap` with the precomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
theorem comp_nullHomotopicMap (f : C ⟶ D) (hom : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) :
f ≫ nullHomotopicMap hom = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => f.f i ≫ hom i j := by
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_add, assoc, f.comm_assoc]
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap'` with the precomposition by a morphism
of complexes. -/
theorem comp_nullHomotopicMap' (f : C ⟶ D) (hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (D.X i ⟶ E.X j)) :
f ≫ nullHomotopicMap' hom = nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => f.f i ≫ hom i j hij := by
ext n
rw [nullHomotopicMap', comp_nullHomotopicMap]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [comp_zero]
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap` with the application of additive functors -/
theorem map_nullHomotopicMap {W : Type*} [Category W] [Preadditive W] (G : V ⥤ W) [G.Additive]
(hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(G.mapHomologicalComplex c).map (nullHomotopicMap hom) =
nullHomotopicMap (fun i j => by exact G.map (hom i j)) := by
ext i
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, dNext, prevD]
simp only [G.map_comp, Functor.map_add]
/-- Compatibility of `nullHomotopicMap'` with the application of additive functors -/
theorem map_nullHomotopicMap' {W : Type*} [Category W] [Preadditive W] (G : V ⥤ W) [G.Additive]
(hom : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(G.mapHomologicalComplex c).map (nullHomotopicMap' hom) =
nullHomotopicMap' fun i j hij => by exact G.map (hom i j hij) := by
ext n
rw [nullHomotopicMap', map_nullHomotopicMap]
congr
ext i j
split_ifs
· rfl
· rw [G.map_zero]
/-- Tautological construction of the `Homotopy` to zero for maps constructed by
`nullHomotopicMap`, at least when we have the `zero` condition. -/
@[simps]
def nullHomotopy (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (zero : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel j i → hom i j = 0) :
Homotopy (nullHomotopicMap hom) 0 :=
{ hom := hom
zero := zero
comm := by
intro i
rw [HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, add_zero]
rfl }
open Classical in
/-- Homotopy to zero for maps constructed with `nullHomotopicMap'` -/
@[simps!]
def nullHomotopy' (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) : Homotopy (nullHomotopicMap' h) 0 := by
apply nullHomotopy fun i j => dite (c.Rel j i) (h i j) fun _ => 0
intro i j hij
rw [dite_eq_right_iff]
intro hij'
exfalso
exact hij hij'
/-! This lemma and the following ones can be used in order to compute
the degreewise morphisms induced by the null homotopic maps constructed
with `nullHomotopicMap` or `nullHomotopicMap'` -/
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f {k₂ k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₂₁ : c.Rel k₂ k₁) (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ hom k₀ k₁ + hom k₁ k₂ ≫ D.d k₂ k₁ := by
dsimp only [nullHomotopicMap]
rw [dNext_eq hom r₁₀, prevD_eq hom r₂₁]
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f {k₂ k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₂₁ : c.Rel k₂ k₁) (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ h k₀ k₁ r₁₀ + h k₁ k₂ r₂₁ ≫ D.d k₂ k₁ := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
rw [nullHomotopicMap_f r₂₁ r₁₀]
split_ifs
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_left {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l) (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₀ = hom k₀ k₁ ≫ D.d k₁ k₀ := by
dsimp only [nullHomotopicMap]
rw [prevD_eq hom r₁₀, dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, C.shape, zero_comp, zero_add]
exact hk₀ _
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_left {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l) (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₀ = h k₀ k₁ r₁₀ ≫ D.d k₁ k₀ := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
rw [nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_left r₁₀ hk₀]
split_ifs
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_right {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₁ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₁) (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ hom k₀ k₁ := by
dsimp only [nullHomotopicMap]
rw [dNext_eq hom r₁₀, prevD, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, D.shape, comp_zero, add_zero]
exact hk₁ _
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f_of_not_rel_right {k₁ k₀ : ι} (r₁₀ : c.Rel k₁ k₀)
(hk₁ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₁) (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₁ = C.d k₁ k₀ ≫ h k₀ k₁ r₁₀ := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
rw [nullHomotopicMap_f_of_not_rel_right r₁₀ hk₁]
split_ifs
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap_f_eq_zero {k₀ : ι} (hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l)
(hk₀' : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₀) (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
(nullHomotopicMap hom).f k₀ = 0 := by
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, dNext, prevD]
rw [C.shape, D.shape, zero_comp, comp_zero, add_zero] <;> apply_assumption
@[simp]
theorem nullHomotopicMap'_f_eq_zero {k₀ : ι} (hk₀ : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel k₀ l)
(hk₀' : ∀ l : ι, ¬c.Rel l k₀) (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) :
(nullHomotopicMap' h).f k₀ = 0 := by
simp only [nullHomotopicMap']
apply nullHomotopicMap_f_eq_zero hk₀ hk₀'
/-!
`Homotopy.mkInductive` allows us to build a homotopy of chain complexes inductively,
so that as we construct each component, we have available the previous two components,
and the fact that they satisfy the homotopy condition.
To simplify the situation, we only construct homotopies of the form `Homotopy e 0`.
`Homotopy.equivSubZero` can provide the general case.
Notice however, that this construction does not have particularly good definitional properties:
we have to insert `eqToHom` in several places.
Hopefully this is okay in most applications, where we only need to have the existence of some
homotopy.
-/
| section MkInductive
variable {P Q : ChainComplex V ℕ}
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem prevD_chainComplex (f : ∀ i j, P.X i ⟶ Q.X j) (j : ℕ) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Homotopy.lean | 423 | 428 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Emily Riehl
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.TwoSquare
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.HomCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
/-!
# Mate of natural transformations
This file establishes the bijection between the 2-cells
```
L₁ R₁
C --→ D C ←-- D
G ↓ ↗ ↓ H G ↓ ↘ ↓ H
E --→ F E ←-- F
L₂ R₂
```
where `L₁ ⊣ R₁` and `L₂ ⊣ R₂`. The corresponding natural transformations are called mates.
This bijection includes a number of interesting cases as specializations. For instance, in the
special case where `G,H` are identity functors then the bijection preserves and reflects
isomorphisms (i.e. we have bijections`(L₂ ⟶ L₁) ≃ (R₁ ⟶ R₂)`, and if either side is an iso then the
other side is as well). This demonstrates that adjoints to a given functor are unique up to
isomorphism (since if `L₁ ≅ L₂` then we deduce `R₁ ≅ R₂`).
Another example arises from considering the square representing that a functor `H` preserves
products, in particular the morphism `HA ⨯ H- ⟶ H(A ⨯ -)`. Then provided `(A ⨯ -)` and `HA ⨯ -`
have left adjoints (for instance if the relevant categories are cartesian closed), the transferred
natural transformation is the exponential comparison morphism: `H(A ^ -) ⟶ HA ^ H-`.
Furthermore if `H` has a left adjoint `L`, this morphism is an isomorphism iff its mate
`L(HA ⨯ -) ⟶ A ⨯ L-` is an isomorphism, see
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Frobenius+reciprocity#InCategoryTheory.
This also relates to Grothendieck's yoga of six operations, though this is not spelled out in
mathlib: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/six+operations.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ v₅ v₆ v₇ v₈ v₉ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄ u₅ u₆ u₇ u₈ u₉
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Functor Adjunction NatTrans TwoSquare
section mateEquiv
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} {E : Type u₃} {F : Type u₄}
variable [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] [Category.{v₃} E] [Category.{v₄} F]
variable {G : C ⥤ E} {H : D ⥤ F} {L₁ : C ⥤ D} {R₁ : D ⥤ C} {L₂ : E ⥤ F} {R₂ : F ⥤ E}
variable (adj₁ : L₁ ⊣ R₁) (adj₂ : L₂ ⊣ R₂)
/-- Suppose we have a square of functors (where the top and bottom are adjunctions `L₁ ⊣ R₁`
and `L₂ ⊣ R₂` respectively).
```
C ↔ D
G ↓ ↓ H
E ↔ F
```
Then we have a bijection between natural transformations `G ⋙ L₂ ⟶ L₁ ⋙ H` and
`R₁ ⋙ G ⟶ H ⋙ R₂`. This can be seen as a bijection of the 2-cells:
```
L₁ R₁
C --→ D C ←-- D
G ↓ ↗ ↓ H G ↓ ↘ ↓ H
E --→ F E ←-- F
L₂ R₂
```
Note that if one of the transformations is an iso, it does not imply the other is an iso.
-/
@[simps]
def mateEquiv : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H ≃ TwoSquare R₁ H G R₂ where
toFun α := .mk _ _ _ _ <|
whiskerLeft (R₁ ⋙ G) adj₂.unit ≫
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft R₁ α.natTrans) R₂ ≫
whiskerRight adj₁.counit (H ⋙ R₂)
invFun β := .mk _ _ _ _ <|
whiskerRight adj₁.unit (G ⋙ L₂) ≫
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft L₁ β.natTrans) L₂ ≫
whiskerLeft (L₁ ⋙ H) adj₂.counit
left_inv α := by
ext
unfold whiskerRight whiskerLeft
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Functor.comp_map, comp_app, map_comp, assoc, counit_naturality,
counit_naturality_assoc, left_triangle_components_assoc]
rw [← assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, α.natTrans.naturality, Functor.comp_map, assoc, ← H.map_comp,
left_triangle_components, map_id]
simp only [comp_obj, comp_id]
right_inv β := by
ext
unfold whiskerLeft whiskerRight
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Functor.comp_map, comp_app, map_comp, assoc,
unit_naturality_assoc, right_triangle_components_assoc]
rw [← assoc, ← Functor.comp_map, assoc, ← β.natTrans.naturality, ← assoc, Functor.comp_map,
← G.map_comp, right_triangle_components, map_id, id_comp]
/-- A component of a transposed version of the mates correspondence. -/
theorem mateEquiv_counit (α : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H) (d : D) :
L₂.map ((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α).app _) ≫ adj₂.counit.app _ =
α.app _ ≫ H.map (adj₁.counit.app d) := by simp
/-- A component of a transposed version of the inverse mates correspondence. -/
theorem mateEquiv_counit_symm (α : TwoSquare R₁ H G R₂) (d : D) :
L₂.map (α.app _) ≫ adj₂.counit.app _ =
((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α).app _ ≫ H.map (adj₁.counit.app d) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).right_inv α]
exact (mateEquiv_counit adj₁ adj₂ ((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α) d)
/- A component of a transposed version of the mates correspondence. -/
theorem unit_mateEquiv (α : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H) (c : C) :
G.map (adj₁.unit.app c) ≫ (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α).app _ =
adj₂.unit.app _ ≫ R₂.map (α.app _) := by
dsimp [mateEquiv]
rw [← adj₂.unit_naturality_assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← R₂.map_comp, ← Functor.comp_map G L₂, α.naturality]
rw [R₂.map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
rw [← R₂.map_comp, Functor.comp_map L₁ H, ← H.map_comp, left_triangle_components]
simp only [comp_obj, map_id, comp_id]
/-- A component of a transposed version of the inverse mates correspondence. -/
theorem unit_mateEquiv_symm (α : TwoSquare R₁ H G R₂) (c : C) :
G.map (adj₁.unit.app c) ≫ α.app _ =
adj₂.unit.app _ ≫ R₂.map (((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α).app _) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).right_inv α]
exact (unit_mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ ((mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂).symm α) c)
end mateEquiv
section mateEquivVComp
variable {A : Type u₁} {B : Type u₂} {C : Type u₃} {D : Type u₄} {E : Type u₅} {F : Type u₆}
variable [Category.{v₁} A] [Category.{v₂} B] [Category.{v₃} C]
variable [Category.{v₄} D] [Category.{v₅} E] [Category.{v₆} F]
variable {G₁ : A ⥤ C} {G₂ : C ⥤ E} {H₁ : B ⥤ D} {H₂ : D ⥤ F}
variable {L₁ : A ⥤ B} {R₁ : B ⥤ A} {L₂ : C ⥤ D} {R₂ : D ⥤ C} {L₃ : E ⥤ F} {R₃ : F ⥤ E}
variable (adj₁ : L₁ ⊣ R₁) (adj₂ : L₂ ⊣ R₂) (adj₃ : L₃ ⊣ R₃)
/-- The mates equivalence commutes with vertical composition. -/
theorem mateEquiv_vcomp (α : TwoSquare G₁ L₁ L₂ H₁) (β : TwoSquare G₂ L₂ L₃ H₂) :
(mateEquiv adj₁ adj₃) (α ≫ₕ β) = (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α) ≫ᵥ (mateEquiv adj₂ adj₃ β) := by
unfold hComp vComp mateEquiv
ext b
simp only [comp_obj, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_twice, whiskerRight_comp,
assoc, comp_app, whiskerLeft_app, whiskerRight_app, associator_hom_app, map_id,
associator_inv_app, id_obj, Functor.comp_map, id_comp, whiskerRight_twice, comp_id]
slice_rhs 1 4 => rw [← assoc, ← assoc, ← unit_naturality (adj₃)]
rw [L₃.map_comp, R₃.map_comp]
slice_rhs 2 4 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, ← R₃.map_comp, ← assoc, ← L₃.map_comp, ← G₂.map_comp, ← G₂.map_comp]
rw [← Functor.comp_map G₂ L₃, β.naturality]
rw [(L₂ ⋙ H₂).map_comp, R₃.map_comp, R₃.map_comp]
slice_rhs 4 5 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, Functor.comp_map L₂ _, ← Functor.comp_map _ L₂, ← H₂.map_comp]
rw [adj₂.counit.naturality]
simp only [comp_obj, Functor.comp_map, map_comp, id_obj, Functor.id_map, assoc]
slice_rhs 4 5 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, ← H₂.map_comp, ← Functor.comp_map _ L₂, adj₂.counit.naturality]
simp only [comp_obj, id_obj, Functor.id_map, map_comp, assoc]
slice_rhs 3 4 =>
rw [← R₃.map_comp, ← H₂.map_comp, left_triangle_components]
simp only [map_id, id_comp]
end mateEquivVComp
section mateEquivHComp
variable {A : Type u₁} {B : Type u₂} {C : Type u₃} {D : Type u₄} {E : Type u₅} {F : Type u₆}
variable [Category.{v₁} A] [Category.{v₂} B] [Category.{v₃} C]
variable [Category.{v₄} D] [Category.{v₅} E] [Category.{v₆} F]
variable {G : A ⥤ D} {H : B ⥤ E} {K : C ⥤ F}
variable {L₁ : A ⥤ B} {R₁ : B ⥤ A} {L₂ : D ⥤ E} {R₂ : E ⥤ D}
variable {L₃ : B ⥤ C} {R₃ : C ⥤ B} {L₄ : E ⥤ F} {R₄ : F ⥤ E}
variable (adj₁ : L₁ ⊣ R₁) (adj₂ : L₂ ⊣ R₂) (adj₃ : L₃ ⊣ R₃) (adj₄ : L₄ ⊣ R₄)
/-- The mates equivalence commutes with horizontal composition of squares. -/
theorem mateEquiv_hcomp (α : TwoSquare G L₁ L₂ H) (β : TwoSquare H L₃ L₄ K) :
(mateEquiv (adj₁.comp adj₃) (adj₂.comp adj₄)) (α ≫ᵥ β) =
(mateEquiv adj₃ adj₄ β) ≫ₕ (mateEquiv adj₁ adj₂ α) := by
unfold vComp hComp mateEquiv Adjunction.comp
| ext c
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, map_comp, id_comp, assoc]
slice_rhs 2 4 =>
rw [← R₂.map_comp, ← R₂.map_comp, ← assoc, ← unit_naturality (adj₄)]
rw [R₂.map_comp, L₄.map_comp, R₄.map_comp, R₂.map_comp]
slice_rhs 4 5 =>
rw [← R₂.map_comp, ← R₄.map_comp, ← Functor.comp_map _ L₄ , β.naturality]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Mates.lean | 189 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Closure
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
/-!
# Sets closed under join/meet
This file defines predicates for sets closed under `⊔` and shows that each set in a join-semilattice
generates a join-closed set and that a semilattice where every directed set has a least upper bound
is automatically complete. All dually for `⊓`.
## Main declarations
* `SupClosed`: Predicate for a set to be closed under join (`a ∈ s` and `b ∈ s` imply `a ⊔ b ∈ s`).
* `InfClosed`: Predicate for a set to be closed under meet (`a ∈ s` and `b ∈ s` imply `a ⊓ b ∈ s`).
* `IsSublattice`: Predicate for a set to be closed under meet and join.
* `supClosure`: Sup-closure. Smallest sup-closed set containing a given set.
* `infClosure`: Inf-closure. Smallest inf-closed set containing a given set.
* `latticeClosure`: Smallest sublattice containing a given set.
* `SemilatticeSup.toCompleteSemilatticeSup`: A join-semilattice where every sup-closed set has a
least upper bound is automatically complete.
* `SemilatticeInf.toCompleteSemilatticeInf`: A meet-semilattice where every inf-closed set has a
greatest lower bound is automatically complete.
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {F α β : Type*}
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
section Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is *sup-closed* if `a ⊔ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`. -/
def SupClosed (s : Set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a ⊔ b ∈ s
@[simp] lemma supClosed_empty : SupClosed (∅ : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
@[simp] lemma supClosed_singleton : SupClosed ({a} : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
@[simp] lemma supClosed_univ : SupClosed (univ : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
lemma SupClosed.inter (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : SupClosed t) : SupClosed (s ∩ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma supClosed_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, SupClosed s) : SupClosed (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _s hs ↦ hS _ hs (ha _ hs) (hb _ hs)
lemma supClosed_iInter (hf : ∀ i, SupClosed (f i)) : SupClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
supClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma SupClosed.directedOn (hs : SupClosed s) : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨_, hs ha hb, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.supClosed (hs : IsUpperSet s) : SupClosed s := fun _a _ _b ↦ hs le_sup_right
lemma SupClosed.preimage [FunLike F β α] [SupHomClass F β α] (hs : SupClosed s) (f : F) :
SupClosed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by simpa [map_sup] using hs ha hb
lemma SupClosed.image [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β] (hs : SupClosed s) (f : F) :
SupClosed (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [← map_sup]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| hs ha hb
lemma supClosed_range [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β] (f : F) : SupClosed (Set.range f) := by
simpa using supClosed_univ.image f
lemma SupClosed.prod {t : Set β} (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : SupClosed t) : SupClosed (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma supClosed_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SemilatticeSup (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, SupClosed (t i)) : SupClosed (s.pi t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _i hi ↦ ht _ hi (ha _ hi) (hb _ hi)
lemma SupClosed.insert_upperBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (hs : SupClosed s) (ha : a ∈ upperBounds s) :
SupClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [SupClosed]
aesop
lemma SupClosed.insert_lowerBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : SupClosed s) (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) :
SupClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [SupClosed]
have ha' : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b := fun _ a ↦ ha a
aesop
end Set
section Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {t : Finset ι} {a : α}
open Finset
lemma SupClosed.finsetSup'_mem (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.sup' ht f ∈ s :=
sup'_induction _ _ hs
lemma SupClosed.finsetSup_mem [OrderBot α] (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.sup f ∈ s :=
sup'_eq_sup ht f ▸ hs.finsetSup'_mem ht
end Finset
end SemilatticeSup
| section SemilatticeInf
| Mathlib/Order/SupClosed.lean | 111 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Shift
/-!
# Estimates for the complex logarithm
We show that `log (1+z)` differs from its Taylor polynomial up to degree `n` by at most
`‖z‖^(n+1)/((n+1)*(1-‖z‖))` when `‖z‖ < 1`; see `Complex.norm_log_sub_logTaylor_le`.
To this end, we derive the representation of `log (1+z)` as the integral of `1/(1+tz)`
over the unit interval (`Complex.log_eq_integral`) and introduce notation
`Complex.logTaylor n` for the Taylor polynomial up to degree `n-1`.
## TODO
Refactor using general Taylor series theory, once this exists in Mathlib.
-/
namespace Complex
/-!
### Integral representation of the complex log
-/
lemma continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ ↦ (1 + t • z)⁻¹) (Set.Icc 0 1) :=
ContinuousOn.inv₀ (by fun_prop)
(fun _ ht ↦ slitPlane_ne_zero <| StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane hz ht.1 ht.2)
open intervalIntegral in
/-- Represent `log (1 + z)` as an integral over the unit interval -/
lemma log_eq_integral {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
log (1 + z) = z * ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0 : ℝ)..1, (1 + t • z)⁻¹ := by
convert (integral_unitInterval_deriv_eq_sub (continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv hz)
(fun _ ht ↦ hasDerivAt_log <|
StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane hz ht.1 ht.2)).symm using 1
simp only [log_one, sub_zero]
/-- Represent `log (1 - z)⁻¹` as an integral over the unit interval -/
lemma log_inv_eq_integral {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 - z ∈ slitPlane) :
log (1 - z)⁻¹ = z * ∫ (t : ℝ) in (0 : ℝ)..1, (1 - t • z)⁻¹ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg 1 z] at hz ⊢
rw [log_inv _ <| slitPlane_arg_ne_pi hz, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_mul]
convert log_eq_integral hz using 5
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, smul_neg]
/-!
### The Taylor polynomials of the logarithm
-/
/-- The `n`th Taylor polynomial of `log` at `1`, as a function `ℂ → ℂ` -/
noncomputable
def logTaylor (n : ℕ) : ℂ → ℂ := fun z ↦ ∑ j ∈ Finset.range n, (-1) ^ (j + 1) * z ^ j / j
lemma logTaylor_zero : logTaylor 0 = fun _ ↦ 0 := by
funext
simp only [logTaylor, Finset.range_zero, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_one, Finset.sum_empty]
lemma logTaylor_succ (n : ℕ) :
logTaylor (n + 1) = logTaylor n + (fun z : ℂ ↦ (-1) ^ (n + 1) * z ^ n / n) := by
funext
simpa only [logTaylor] using Finset.sum_range_succ ..
lemma logTaylor_at_zero (n : ℕ) : logTaylor n 0 = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [logTaylor_zero]
| succ n ih => simpa [logTaylor_succ, ih] using ne_or_eq n 0
lemma hasDerivAt_logTaylor (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) :
HasDerivAt (logTaylor (n + 1)) (∑ j ∈ Finset.range n, (-1) ^ j * z ^ j) z := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [logTaylor_succ, logTaylor_zero, Pi.add_def, hasDerivAt_const]
| succ n ih =>
rw [logTaylor_succ]
simp only [cpow_natCast, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd,
Finset.sum_range_succ, (show (-1) ^ (n + 1 + 1) = (-1) ^ n by ring)]
refine HasDerivAt.add ih ?_
simp only [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one, mul_div_assoc]
have : HasDerivAt (fun x : ℂ ↦ (x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))) (z ^ n) z := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
convert HasDerivAt.mul_const (hasDerivAt_pow (n + 1) z) (((n : ℂ) + 1)⁻¹) using 1
field_simp [Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero n]
convert HasDerivAt.const_mul _ this using 2
ring
/-!
### Bounds for the difference between log and its Taylor polynomials
-/
lemma hasDerivAt_log_sub_logTaylor (n : ℕ) {z : ℂ} (hz : 1 + z ∈ slitPlane) :
HasDerivAt (fun z : ℂ ↦ log (1 + z) - logTaylor (n + 1) z) ((-z) ^ n * (1 + z)⁻¹) z := by
convert ((hasDerivAt_log hz).comp_const_add 1 z).sub (hasDerivAt_logTaylor n z) using 1
have hz' : -z ≠ 1 := by
intro H
rw [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at H
simp only [H, add_neg_cancel] at hz
exact slitPlane_ne_zero hz rfl
simp_rw [← mul_pow, neg_one_mul, geom_sum_eq hz', ← neg_add', div_neg, add_comm z]
field_simp [slitPlane_ne_zero hz]
/-- Give a bound on `‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖` for `0 ≤ t ≤ 1` and `‖z‖ < 1`. -/
lemma norm_one_add_mul_inv_le {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ Set.Icc 0 1) {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖ ≤ (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ := by
rw [Set.mem_Icc] at ht
rw [norm_inv]
refine inv_anti₀ (by linarith) ?_
calc 1 - ‖z‖
_ ≤ 1 - t * ‖z‖ := by
nlinarith [norm_nonneg z]
_ = 1 - ‖t * z‖ := by
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg ht.1]
_ ≤ ‖1 + t * z‖ := by
rw [← norm_neg (t * z), ← sub_neg_eq_add]
convert norm_sub_norm_le 1 (-(t * z))
exact norm_one.symm
lemma integrable_pow_mul_norm_one_add_mul_inv (n : ℕ) {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun t : ℝ ↦ t ^ n * ‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖) MeasureTheory.volume 0 1 := by
have := continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv <| mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one hz
rw [← Set.uIcc_of_le zero_le_one] at this
exact ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable (by fun_prop)
open intervalIntegral in
/-- The difference of `log (1+z)` and its `(n+1)`st Taylor polynomial can be bounded in
terms of `‖z‖`. -/
lemma norm_log_sub_logTaylor_le (n : ℕ) {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
‖log (1 + z) - logTaylor (n + 1) z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ (n + 1) * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / (n + 1) := by
have help : IntervalIntegrable (fun t : ℝ ↦ t ^ n * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹) MeasureTheory.volume 0 1 :=
IntervalIntegrable.mul_const (Continuous.intervalIntegrable (by fun_prop) 0 1) (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹
let f (z : ℂ) : ℂ := log (1 + z) - logTaylor (n + 1) z
let f' (z : ℂ) : ℂ := (-z) ^ n * (1 + z)⁻¹
have hderiv : ∀ t ∈ Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivAt f (f' (0 + t * z)) (0 + t * z) := by
intro t ht
rw [zero_add]
exact hasDerivAt_log_sub_logTaylor n <|
StarConvex.add_smul_mem starConvex_one_slitPlane (mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one hz) ht.1 ht.2
have hcont : ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ ↦ f' (0 + t * z)) (Set.Icc 0 1) := by
simp only [zero_add, zero_le_one, not_true_eq_false]
exact (Continuous.continuousOn (by fun_prop)).mul <|
continuousOn_one_add_mul_inv <| mem_slitPlane_of_norm_lt_one hz
have H : f z = z * ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, (-(t * z)) ^ n * (1 + t * z)⁻¹ := by
convert (integral_unitInterval_deriv_eq_sub hcont hderiv).symm using 1
· simp only [f, zero_add, add_zero, log_one, logTaylor_at_zero, sub_self, sub_zero]
· simp only [f', add_zero, log_one, logTaylor_at_zero, sub_self, real_smul, zero_add,
smul_eq_mul]
unfold f at H
simp only [H, norm_mul]
simp_rw [neg_pow (_ * z) n, mul_assoc, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, mul_pow,
mul_comm _ (z ^ n), mul_assoc, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, norm_mul, norm_pow,
norm_neg, norm_one, one_pow, one_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', mul_div_assoc]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg z) (n + 1))
calc ‖∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, (t : ℂ) ^ n * (1 + t * z)⁻¹‖
_ ≤ ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, ‖(t : ℂ) ^ n * (1 + t * z)⁻¹‖ :=
intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm zero_le_one
_ = ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, t ^ n * ‖(1 + t * z)⁻¹‖ := by
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr <| fun t ht ↦ ?_
rw [Set.uIcc_of_le zero_le_one, Set.mem_Icc] at ht
simp_rw [norm_mul, norm_pow, Complex.norm_of_nonneg ht.1]
_ ≤ ∫ t in (0 : ℝ)..1, t ^ n * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ :=
intervalIntegral.integral_mono_on zero_le_one
(integrable_pow_mul_norm_one_add_mul_inv n hz) help <|
fun t ht ↦ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_one_add_mul_inv_le ht hz)
(pow_nonneg ((Set.mem_Icc.mp ht).1) _)
_ = (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / (n + 1) := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_mul_const, mul_comm, integral_pow]
field_simp
/-- The difference `log (1+z) - z` is bounded by `‖z‖^2/(2*(1-‖z‖))` when `‖z‖ < 1`. -/
lemma norm_log_one_add_sub_self_le {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
‖log (1 + z) - z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ 2 * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / 2 := by
convert norm_log_sub_logTaylor_le 1 hz using 2
· simp [logTaylor_succ, logTaylor_zero, sub_eq_add_neg]
· norm_num
lemma norm_log_one_add_le {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ < 1) :
‖log (1 + z)‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ 2 * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / 2 + ‖z‖ := by
rw [← sub_add_cancel (log (1 + z)) z]
apply le_trans (norm_add_le _ _)
exact add_le_add_right (Complex.norm_log_one_add_sub_self_le hz) ‖z‖
/-- For `‖z‖ ≤ 1/2`, the complex logarithm is bounded by `(3/2) * ‖z‖`. -/
lemma norm_log_one_add_half_le_self {z : ℂ} (hz : ‖z‖ ≤ 1/2) : ‖(log (1 + z))‖ ≤ (3/2) * ‖z‖ := by
| apply le_trans (norm_log_one_add_le (lt_of_le_of_lt hz one_half_lt_one))
have hz3 : (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ ≤ 2 := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff₀]
· linarith
· linarith
have hz4 : ‖z‖^2 * (1 - ‖z‖)⁻¹ / 2 ≤ ‖z‖/2 * 2 / 2 := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/LogBounds.lean | 190 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left' {a₁ a₂ : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a₁ % b = a₂ % b) : J(a₁ | b) = J(a₂ | b) := by
rw [mod_left, h, ← mod_left]
/-- If `p` is prime, `J(a | p) = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide
`x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : J(a | p) = -1) {x y : ℤ}
(hxy : ↑p ∣ (x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 : ℤ)) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
rw [← legendreSym.to_jacobiSym] at h
exact legendreSym.prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one h hxy
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the first argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_left {l : List ℤ} {n : ℕ} : J(l.prod | n) = (l.map fun a => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, List.map_nil, one_left]
| cons n l' ih => rw [List.map, List.prod_cons, List.prod_cons, mul_left, ih]
/-- We can pull out a product over a list in the second argument of the Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem list_prod_right {a : ℤ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ n ∈ l, n ≠ 0) :
J(a | l.prod) = (l.map fun n => J(a | n)).prod := by
induction l with
| nil => simp only [List.prod_nil, one_right, List.map_nil]
| cons n l' ih =>
have hn := hl n List.mem_cons_self
-- `n ≠ 0`
have hl' := List.prod_ne_zero fun hf => hl 0 (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hf) rfl
| -- `l'.prod ≠ 0`
have h := fun m hm => hl m (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hm)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 246 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Topology on archimedean groups and fields
In this file we prove the following theorems:
- `Rat.denseRange_cast`: the coercion from `ℚ` to a linear ordered archimedean field has dense
range;
- `AddSubgroup.dense_of_not_isolated_zero`, `AddSubgroup.dense_of_no_min`: two sufficient conditions
for a subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered additive commutative group to be dense;
- `AddSubgroup.dense_or_cyclic`: an additive subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered additive
commutative group `G` with order topology either is dense in `G` or is a cyclic subgroup.
-/
open Set
/-- Rational numbers are dense in a linear ordered archimedean field. -/
theorem Rat.denseRange_cast {𝕜} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
[Archimedean 𝕜] : DenseRange ((↑) : ℚ → 𝕜) :=
dense_of_exists_between fun _ _ h => Set.exists_range_iff.2 <| exists_rat_btwn h
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G]
[TopologicalSpace G] [OrderTopology G]
[MulArchimedean G]
/-- A subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered multiplicative commutative group with order
topology is dense provided that for all `ε > 1` there exists an element of the subgroup
that belongs to `(1, ε)`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an archimedean linear ordered additive commutative group with
order topology is dense provided that for all positive `ε` there exists a positive element of the
subgroup that is less than `ε`."]
theorem dense_of_not_isolated_one (S : Subgroup G) (hS : ∀ ε > 1, ∃ g ∈ S, g ∈ Ioo 1 ε) :
Dense (S : Set G) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial G
· refine fun x => _root_.subset_closure ?_
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
exact one_mem S
refine dense_of_exists_between fun a b hlt => ?_
rcases hS (b / a) (one_lt_div'.2 hlt) with ⟨g, hgS, hg0, hg⟩
rcases (existsUnique_add_zpow_mem_Ioc hg0 1 a).exists with ⟨m, hm⟩
rw [one_mul] at hm
refine ⟨g ^ m, zpow_mem hgS _, hm.1, hm.2.trans_lt ?_⟩
rwa [lt_div_iff_mul_lt'] at hg
|
/-- Let `S` be a nontrivial subgroup in an archimedean linear ordered multiplicative commutative
group `G` with order topology. If the set of elements of `S` that are greater than one
does not have a minimal element, then `S` is dense `G`. -/
@[to_additive "Let `S` be a nontrivial additive subgroup in an archimedean linear ordered additive
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Archimedean.lean | 58 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jung Tao Cheng, Christian Merten, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Generators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.MvPolynomial
/-!
# Presentations of algebras
A presentation of an `R`-algebra `S` is a distinguished family of generators and relations.
## Main definition
- `Algebra.Presentation`: A presentation of an `R`-algebra `S` is a family of
generators with
1. `rels`: The type of relations.
2. `relation : relations → MvPolynomial vars R`: The assignment of
each relation to a polynomial in the generators.
- `Algebra.Presentation.IsFinite`: A presentation is called finite, if both variables and relations
are finite.
- `Algebra.Presentation.dimension`: The dimension of a presentation is the number of generators
minus the number of relations.
We also give constructors for localization, base change and composition.
## TODO
- Define `Hom`s of presentations.
## Notes
This contribution was created as part of the AIM workshop "Formalizing algebraic geometry"
in June 2024.
-/
universe t w u v
open TensorProduct MvPolynomial
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
/--
A presentation of an `R`-algebra `S` is a family of
generators with
1. `rels`: The type of relations.
2. `relation : relations → MvPolynomial vars R`: The assignment of
each relation to a polynomial in the generators.
-/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
structure Algebra.Presentation extends Algebra.Generators.{w} R S where
/-- The type of relations. -/
rels : Type t
/-- The assignment of each relation to a polynomial in the generators. -/
relation : rels → toGenerators.Ring
/-- The relations span the kernel of the canonical map. -/
span_range_relation_eq_ker :
Ideal.span (Set.range relation) = toGenerators.ker
namespace Algebra.Presentation
variable {R S}
variable (P : Presentation.{t, w} R S)
@[simp]
lemma aeval_val_relation (i) : aeval P.val (P.relation i) = 0 := by
rw [← RingHom.mem_ker, ← P.ker_eq_ker_aeval_val, ← P.span_range_relation_eq_ker]
exact Ideal.subset_span ⟨i, rfl⟩
lemma relation_mem_ker (i : P.rels) : P.relation i ∈ P.ker := by
rw [← P.span_range_relation_eq_ker]
apply Ideal.subset_span
use i
/-- The polynomial algebra wrt a family of generators modulo a family of relations. -/
protected abbrev Quotient : Type (max w u) := P.Ring ⧸ P.ker
/-- `P.Quotient` is `P.Ring`-isomorphic to `S` and in particular `R`-isomorphic to `S`. -/
def quotientEquiv : P.Quotient ≃ₐ[P.Ring] S :=
Ideal.quotientKerAlgEquivOfRightInverse (f := Algebra.ofId P.Ring S) (g := P.σ) <| fun x ↦ by
rw [Algebra.ofId_apply, P.algebraMap_apply, P.aeval_val_σ]
@[simp]
lemma quotientEquiv_mk (p : P.Ring) : P.quotientEquiv p = algebraMap P.Ring S p :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma quotientEquiv_symm (x : S) : P.quotientEquiv.symm x = P.σ x :=
rfl
/--
Dimension of a presentation defined as the cardinality of the generators
minus the cardinality of the relations.
Note: this definition is completely non-sensical for non-finite presentations and
even then for this to make sense, you should assume that the presentation
is a complete intersection.
-/
noncomputable def dimension : ℕ :=
Nat.card P.vars - Nat.card P.rels
/-- A presentation is finite if there are only finitely-many
relations and finitely-many relations. -/
class IsFinite (P : Presentation.{t, w} R S) : Prop where
finite_vars : Finite P.vars
finite_rels : Finite P.rels
attribute [instance] IsFinite.finite_vars IsFinite.finite_rels
lemma ideal_fg_of_isFinite [P.IsFinite] : P.ker.FG := by
use (Set.finite_range P.relation).toFinset
simp [span_range_relation_eq_ker]
/-- If a presentation is finite, the corresponding quotient is
of finite presentation. -/
instance [P.IsFinite] : FinitePresentation R P.Quotient :=
FinitePresentation.quotient P.ideal_fg_of_isFinite
lemma finitePresentation_of_isFinite [P.IsFinite] :
FinitePresentation R S :=
FinitePresentation.equiv (P.quotientEquiv.restrictScalars R)
variable (R S) in
/-- An arbitrary choice of a finite presentation of a finitely presented algebra. -/
noncomputable
def ofFinitePresentation [FinitePresentation R S] : Presentation.{0, 0} R S :=
letI H := FinitePresentation.out (R := R) (A := S)
letI n : ℕ := H.choose
letI f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] S := H.choose_spec.choose
haveI hf : Function.Surjective f := H.choose_spec.choose_spec.1
haveI hf' : (RingHom.ker f).FG := H.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
letI H' := Submodule.fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family.mp hf'
let m : ℕ := H'.choose
let v : Fin m → MvPolynomial (Fin n) R := H'.choose_spec.choose
let hv : Ideal.span (Set.range v) = RingHom.ker f := H'.choose_spec.choose_spec
{ __ := Generators.ofSurjective (fun x ↦ f (.X x)) (by convert hf; ext; simp)
rels := Fin m
relation := v
span_range_relation_eq_ker := hv.trans (by congr; ext; simp) }
instance [FinitePresentation R S] : (ofFinitePresentation R S).IsFinite where
finite_vars := Finite.of_fintype (Fin _)
finite_rels := Finite.of_fintype (Fin _)
section Construction
/-- If `algebraMap R S` is bijective, the empty generators are a presentation with no relations. -/
noncomputable def ofBijectiveAlgebraMap (h : Function.Bijective (algebraMap R S)) :
Presentation.{t, w} R S where
__ := Generators.ofSurjectiveAlgebraMap h.surjective
rels := PEmpty
relation := PEmpty.elim
span_range_relation_eq_ker := by
simp only [Set.range_eq_empty, Ideal.span_empty]
symm
rw [← RingHom.injective_iff_ker_eq_bot]
show Function.Injective (aeval PEmpty.elim)
rw [aeval_injective_iff_of_isEmpty]
| exact h.injective
instance ofBijectiveAlgebraMap_isFinite (h : Function.Bijective (algebraMap R S)) :
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Presentation.lean | 165 | 167 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Center
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Center
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Centralizer
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Submonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Center
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subsemigroup.Centralizer
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Defs
/-!
# Bundled non-unital subsemirings
We define the `CompleteLattice` structure, and non-unital subsemiring
`map`, `comap` and range (`srange`) of a `NonUnitalRingHom` etc.
-/
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (M : Subsemigroup R)
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
@[mono]
theorem toSubsemigroup_strictMono :
StrictMono (toSubsemigroup : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → Subsemigroup R) := fun _ _ => id
@[mono]
theorem toSubsemigroup_mono : Monotone (toSubsemigroup : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → Subsemigroup R) :=
toSubsemigroup_strictMono.monotone
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_strictMono :
StrictMono (toAddSubmonoid : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) := fun _ _ => id
@[mono]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toAddSubmonoid : NonUnitalSubsemiring R → AddSubmonoid R) :=
toAddSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring T]
variable {F G : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
[FunLike G S T] [NonUnitalRingHomClass G S T]
(s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R)
/-- The ring equiv between the top element of `NonUnitalSubsemiring R` and `R`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) ≃+* R :=
{ Subsemigroup.topEquiv, AddSubmonoid.topEquiv with }
/-- The preimage of a non-unital subsemiring along a non-unital ring homomorphism is a
non-unital subsemiring. -/
def comap (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.comap (f : MulHom R S), s.toAddSubmonoid.comap (f : R →+ S) with
carrier := f ⁻¹' s }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) (f : F) : (s.comap f : Set R) = f ⁻¹' s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S} {f : F} {x : R} : x ∈ s.comap f ↔ f x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
-- this has some nasty coercions, how to deal with it?
theorem comap_comap (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring T) (g : G) (f : F) :
((s.comap g : NonUnitalSubsemiring S).comap f : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) =
s.comap ((g : S →ₙ+* T).comp (f : R →ₙ+* S)) :=
rfl
/-- The image of a non-unital subsemiring along a ring homomorphism is a non-unital subsemiring. -/
def map (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring S :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.map (f : R →ₙ* S), s.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : R →+ S) with carrier := f '' s }
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : F) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : (s.map f : Set S) = f '' s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {y : S} : y ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : s.map (NonUnitalRingHom.id R) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
-- unavoidable coercions?
theorem map_map (g : G) (f : F) :
(s.map (f : R →ₙ+* S)).map (g : S →ₙ+* T) = s.map ((g : S →ₙ+* T).comp (f : R →ₙ+* S)) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
@GaloisConnection (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (NonUnitalSubsemiring S) _ _ (map f) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
/-- A non-unital subsemiring is isomorphic to its image under an injective function -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective (f : R → S)) :
s ≃+* s.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f s hf with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_mul f _ _)
map_add' := fun _ _ => Subtype.ext (map_add f _ _) }
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : s) :
(equivMapOfInjective s f hf x : S) = f x :=
rfl
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace NonUnitalRingHom
open NonUnitalSubsemiring
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring T]
variable {F G : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
variable [FunLike G S T] [NonUnitalRingHomClass G S T] (f : F) (g : G)
/-- The range of a non-unital ring homomorphism is a non-unital subsemiring.
See note [range copy pattern]. -/
def srange : NonUnitalSubsemiring S :=
((⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).map (f : R →ₙ+* S)).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_srange : (srange f : Set S) = Set.range f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_srange {f : F} {y : S} : y ∈ srange f ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem srange_eq_map : srange f = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).map f := by
ext
simp
theorem mem_srange_self (f : F) (x : R) : f x ∈ srange f :=
mem_srange.mpr ⟨x, rfl⟩
theorem map_srange (g : S →ₙ+* T) (f : R →ₙ+* S) : map g (srange f) = srange (g.comp f) := by
simpa only [srange_eq_map] using (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).map_map g f
/-- The range of a morphism of non-unital semirings is finite if the domain is a finite. -/
instance finite_srange [Finite R] (f : F) : Finite (srange f : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :=
(Set.finite_range f).to_subtype
end NonUnitalRingHom
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
instance : InfSet (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
⟨fun s =>
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' (⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t) (⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup t)
(by simp) (⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t) (by simp)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) :
((sInf S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : Set R) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)} {x : R} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring R} :
(↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set R) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : R} :
(x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubsemigroup (s : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toSubsemigroup = ⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toSubsemigroup t :=
mk'_toSubsemigroup _ _
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toAddSubmonoid (s : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) :
(sInf s).toAddSubmonoid = ⨅ t ∈ s, NonUnitalSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid t :=
mk'_toAddSubmonoid _ _
/-- Non-unital subsemirings of a non-unital semiring form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)
fun _ => IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun s _ hx => (mem_bot.mp hx).symm ▸ zero_mem s
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _ _ => trivial
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩ }
theorem eq_top_iff' (A : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : A = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : R, x ∈ A :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable (R)
/-- The center of a semiring `R` is the set of elements that commute and associate with everything
in `R` -/
def center : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ Subsemigroup.center R with
zero_mem' := Set.zero_mem_center
add_mem' := Set.add_mem_center }
theorem coe_center : ↑(center R) = Set.center R :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_toSubsemigroup :
(center R).toSubsemigroup = Subsemigroup.center R :=
rfl
/-- The center is commutative and associative. -/
instance center.instNonUnitalCommSemiring : NonUnitalCommSemiring (center R) :=
{ Subsemigroup.center.commSemigroup,
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (center R) with }
/-- A point-free means of proving membership in the center, for a non-associative ring.
This can be helpful when working with types that have ext lemmas for `R →+ R`. -/
lemma _root_.Set.mem_center_iff_addMonoidHom (a : R) :
a ∈ Set.center R ↔
AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a = .mulRight a ∧
AddMonoidHom.compr₂ .mul (.mulLeft a) = .comp .mul (.mulLeft a) ∧
AddMonoidHom.comp .mul (.mulRight a) = .compl₂ .mul (.mulLeft a) ∧
AddMonoidHom.compr₂ .mul (.mulRight a) = .compl₂ .mul (.mulRight a) := by
rw [Set.mem_center_iff, isMulCentral_iff]
simp [DFunLike.ext_iff]
variable {R}
/-- The center of isomorphic (not necessarily unital or associative) semirings are isomorphic. -/
@[simps!] def centerCongr [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] (e : R ≃+* S) : center R ≃+* center S where
__ := Subsemigroup.centerCongr e
map_add' _ _ := Subtype.ext <| by exact map_add e ..
/-- The center of a (not necessarily unital or associative) semiring
is isomorphic to the center of its opposite. -/
@[simps!] def centerToMulOpposite : center R ≃+* center Rᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := Subsemigroup.centerToMulOpposite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalSemiring
-- no instance diamond, unlike the unital version
example {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] :
(center.instNonUnitalCommSemiring _).toNonUnitalSemiring =
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalSemiring (center R) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem mem_center_iff {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {z : R} : z ∈ center R ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := by
rw [← Semigroup.mem_center_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
instance decidableMemCenter {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] [DecidableEq R] [Fintype R] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ center R) := fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ mem_center_iff
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_top (R) [NonUnitalCommSemiring R] : center R = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.center_eq_univ R)
end NonUnitalSemiring
section Centralizer
/-- The centralizer of a set as non-unital subsemiring. -/
def centralizer {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ Subsemigroup.centralizer s with
carrier := s.centralizer
zero_mem' := Set.zero_mem_centralizer
add_mem' := Set.add_mem_centralizer }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_centralizer {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s : Set R) = s.centralizer :=
rfl
theorem centralizer_toSubsemigroup {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) :
(centralizer s).toSubsemigroup = Subsemigroup.centralizer s :=
rfl
theorem mem_centralizer_iff {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {s : Set R} {z : R} :
z ∈ centralizer s ↔ ∀ g ∈ s, g * z = z * g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem center_le_centralizer {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s) : center R ≤ centralizer s :=
s.center_subset_centralizer
theorem centralizer_le {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s t : Set R) (h : s ⊆ t) :
centralizer t ≤ centralizer s :=
Set.centralizer_subset h
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {s : Set R} :
centralizer s = ⊤ ↔ s ⊆ center R :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.centralizer_eq_top_iff_subset
@[simp]
theorem centralizer_univ {R} [NonUnitalSemiring R] : centralizer Set.univ = center R :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.centralizer_univ R)
end Centralizer
/-- The `NonUnitalSubsemiring` generated by a set. -/
def closure (s : Set R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
theorem mem_closure {x : R} {s : Set R} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : NonUnitalSubsemiring R, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
/-- The non-unital subsemiring generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_closure {s : Set R} : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : Set R} {P : R} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
/-- A non-unital subsemiring `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_le {s : Set R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} : closure s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Set.Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
/-- Subsemiring closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set R⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Set.Subset.trans h subset_closure
theorem closure_eq_of_le {s : Set R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} (h₁ : s ⊆ t)
(h₂ : t ≤ closure s) : closure s = t :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
lemma closure_le_centralizer_centralizer {R : Type*} [NonUnitalSemiring R] (s : Set R) :
closure s ≤ centralizer (centralizer s) :=
closure_le.mpr Set.subset_centralizer_centralizer
/-- If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is a non-unital commutative
semiring. -/
abbrev closureNonUnitalCommSemiringOfComm {R : Type*} [NonUnitalSemiring R] {s : Set R}
(hcomm : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x * y = y * x) : NonUnitalCommSemiring (closure s) :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.toNonUnitalSemiring (closure s) with
mul_comm := fun ⟨_, h₁⟩ ⟨_, h₂⟩ ↦
have := closure_le_centralizer_centralizer s
Subtype.ext <| Set.centralizer_centralizer_comm_of_comm hcomm _ (this h₁) _ (this h₂) }
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : R ≃+* S} {K : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {x : S} :
x ∈ K.map (f : R →ₙ+* S) ↔ f.symm x ∈ K := by
convert @Set.mem_image_equiv _ _ (↑K) f.toEquiv x
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
K.map (f : R →ₙ+* S) = K.comap f.symm :=
SetLike.coe_injective (f.toEquiv.image_eq_preimage K)
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (f : R ≃+* S) (K : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :
K.comap (f : R →ₙ+* S) = K.map f.symm :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm f.symm K).symm
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace Subsemigroup
/-- The additive closure of a non-unital subsemigroup is a non-unital subsemiring. -/
def nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure (M : Subsemigroup R) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) with mul_mem' := MulMemClass.mul_mem_add_closure }
theorem nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_coe :
(M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
theorem nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid :
M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure.toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure (M : Set R) :=
rfl
/-- The `NonUnitalSubsemiring` generated by a multiplicative subsemigroup coincides with the
`NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure` of the subsemigroup itself . -/
theorem nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_eq_closure :
M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure = NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure (M : Set R) := by
ext
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_,
fun hx => (NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_closure.mp hx) M.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure fun s sM => ?_⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H1, rfl⟩
<;> rintro - ⟨H2, rfl⟩
· exact AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hx H1.toAddSubmonoid H2
· exact H2 sM
end Subsemigroup
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem closure_subsemigroup_closure (s : Set R) : closure ↑(Subsemigroup.closure s) = closure s :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le.mpr fun _ hy =>
(Subsemigroup.mem_closure.mp hy) (closure s).toSubsemigroup subset_closure)
(closure_mono Subsemigroup.subset_closure)
/-- The elements of the non-unital subsemiring closure of `M` are exactly the elements of the
additive closure of a multiplicative subsemigroup `M`. -/
theorem coe_closure_eq (s : Set R) :
(closure s : Set R) = AddSubmonoid.closure (Subsemigroup.closure s : Set R) := by
simp [← Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_toAddSubmonoid,
Subsemigroup.nonUnitalSubsemiringClosure_eq_closure]
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set R} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ x ∈ AddSubmonoid.closure (Subsemigroup.closure s : Set R) :=
Set.ext_iff.mp (coe_closure_eq s) x
@[simp]
theorem closure_addSubmonoid_closure {s : Set R} :
closure ↑(AddSubmonoid.closure s) = closure s := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => closure_mono AddSubmonoid.subset_closure hx⟩
rintro - ⟨H, rfl⟩
rintro - ⟨J, rfl⟩
refine (AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp (mem_closure_iff.mp hx)) H.toAddSubmonoid fun y hy => ?_
refine (Subsemigroup.mem_closure.mp hy) H.toSubsemigroup fun z hz => ?_
exact (AddSubmonoid.mem_closure.mp hz) H.toAddSubmonoid fun w hw => J hw
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `0`, `1`, and all elements
of `s`, and is preserved under addition and multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements
of the closure of `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {s : Set R} {p : (x : R) → x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure hx)) (zero : p 0 (zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
{x} (hx : x ∈ closure s) : p x hx :=
let K : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
add_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩ }
closure_le (t := K) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_closure hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction₂ {s : Set R} {p : (x y : R) → x ∈ closure s → y ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem_mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s) (y) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_closure hx) (subset_closure hy))
(zero_left : ∀ x hx, p 0 x (zero_mem _) hx) (zero_right : ∀ x hx, p x 0 hx (zero_mem _))
(add_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x + y) z (add_mem hx hy) hz)
(add_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y + z) hx (add_mem hy hz))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y * z) hx (mul_mem hy hz))
{x y : R} (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure s) :
p x y hx hy := by
induction hy using closure_induction with
| mem z hz => induction hx using closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_mem _ h _ hz
| zero => exact zero_left _ _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| zero => exact zero_right x hx
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
variable (R) in
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure R _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure s
gc _ _ := closure_le
le_l_u _ := subset_closure
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
/-- Closure of a non-unital subsemiring `S` equals `S`. -/
@[simp]
theorem closure_eq (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : closure (s : Set R) = s :=
(NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi R).l_u_eq s
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set R) = ⊥ :=
(NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi R).gc.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (Set.univ : Set R) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top R _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
theorem closure_union (s t : Set R) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi R).gc.l_sup
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set R) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi R).gc.l_iSup
theorem closure_sUnion (s : Set (Set R)) : closure (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, closure t :=
(NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi R).gc.l_sSup
theorem map_sup (s t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (f : F) :
(map f (s ⊔ t) : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = map f s ⊔ map f t :=
@GaloisConnection.l_sup _ _ s t _ _ _ _ (gc_map_comap f)
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (s : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
(map f (iSup s) : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = ⨆ i, map f (s i) :=
@GaloisConnection.l_iSup _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (gc_map_comap f) s
theorem map_inf (s t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(map f (s ⊓ t) : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = map f s ⊓ map f t :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
theorem map_iInf {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
(map f (iInf s) : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = ⨅ i, map f (s i) := by
apply SetLike.coe_injective
simpa using (Set.injOn_of_injective hf).image_iInter_eq (s := SetLike.coe ∘ s)
theorem comap_inf (s t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) (f : F) :
(comap f (s ⊓ t) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) = comap f s ⊓ comap f t :=
@GaloisConnection.u_inf _ _ s t _ _ _ _ (gc_map_comap f)
theorem comap_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (s : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :
(comap f (iInf s) : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) = ⨅ i, comap f (s i) :=
@GaloisConnection.u_iInf _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (gc_map_comap f) s
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : F) : map f (⊥ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) = (⊥ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : F) : comap f (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
/-- Given `NonUnitalSubsemiring`s `s`, `t` of semirings `R`, `S` respectively, `s.prod t` is
`s × t` as a non-unital subsemiring of `R × S`. -/
def prod (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) : NonUnitalSubsemiring (R × S) :=
{ s.toSubsemigroup.prod t.toSubsemigroup, s.toAddSubmonoid.prod t.toAddSubmonoid with
carrier := (s : Set R) ×ˢ (t : Set S) }
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :
(s.prod t : Set (R × S)) = (s : Set R) ×ˢ (t : Set S) :=
rfl
theorem mem_prod {s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R} {t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S} {p : R × S} :
p ∈ s.prod t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
@[mono]
theorem prod_mono ⦃s₁ s₂ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R⦄ (hs : s₁ ≤ s₂) ⦃t₁ t₂ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S⦄
(ht : t₁ ≤ t₂) : s₁.prod t₁ ≤ s₂.prod t₂ :=
Set.prod_mono hs ht
theorem prod_mono_right (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
Monotone fun t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S => s.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl s)
theorem prod_mono_left (t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :
Monotone fun s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R => s.prod t := fun _ _ hs => prod_mono hs (le_refl t)
theorem prod_top (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
s.prod (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = s.comap (NonUnitalRingHom.fst R S) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
theorem top_prod (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :
(⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).prod s = s.comap (NonUnitalRingHom.snd R S) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[simp]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R).prod (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
/-- Product of non-unital subsemirings is isomorphic to their product as semigroups. -/
def prodEquiv (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) (t : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) : s.prod t ≃+* s × t :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (s : Set R) (t : Set S) with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {S : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring R}
(hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) {x : R} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup S i hi⟩
let U : NonUnitalSubsemiring R :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mk' (⋃ i, (S i : Set R))
(⨆ i, (S i).toSubsemigroup) (Subsemigroup.coe_iSup_of_directed hS)
(⨆ i, (S i).toAddSubmonoid) (AddSubmonoid.coe_iSup_of_directed hS)
-- Porting note `@this` doesn't work
suffices H : ⨆ i, S i ≤ U by simpa [U] using @H x
exact iSup_le fun i x hx => Set.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hx⟩
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {S : ι → NonUnitalSubsemiring R}
(hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) : ((⨆ i, S i : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : Set R) = ⋃ i, S i :=
Set.ext fun x ↦ by simp [mem_iSup_of_directed hS]
theorem mem_sSup_of_directedOn {S : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)} (Sne : S.Nonempty)
(hS : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S) {x : R} : x ∈ sSup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, x ∈ s := by
haveI : Nonempty S := Sne.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed hS.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem coe_sSup_of_directedOn {S : Set (NonUnitalSubsemiring R)} (Sne : S.Nonempty)
(hS : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S) : (↑(sSup S) : Set R) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp [mem_sSup_of_directedOn Sne hS]
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace NonUnitalRingHom
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F R S]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_stop {f g : F}
(h : Set.EqOn (f : R → S) (g : R → S) (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring R)) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ fun _ => h trivial
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring T]
[NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
{S' : Type*} [SetLike S' S] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S' S]
{s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R}
open NonUnitalSubsemiringClass NonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Restriction of a non-unital ring homomorphism to its range interpreted as a
non-unital subsemiring.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
def srangeRestrict (f : F) : R →ₙ+* (srange f : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :=
codRestrict f (srange f) (mem_srange_self f)
@[simp]
theorem coe_srangeRestrict (f : F) (x : R) : (srangeRestrict f x : S) = f x :=
rfl
theorem srangeRestrict_surjective (f : F) :
Function.Surjective (srangeRestrict f : R → (srange f : NonUnitalSubsemiring S)) :=
fun ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := mem_srange.mp hy
⟨x, Subtype.ext hx⟩
theorem srange_eq_top_iff_surjective {f : F} :
srange f = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) ↔ Function.Surjective (f : R → S) :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans <| Iff.trans (by rw [coe_srange, coe_top]) Set.range_eq_univ
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias srange_top_iff_surjective := srange_eq_top_iff_surjective
/-- The range of a surjective non-unital ring homomorphism is the whole of the codomain. -/
@[simp]
theorem srange_eq_top_of_surjective (f : F) (hf : Function.Surjective (f : R → S)) :
srange f = (⊤ : NonUnitalSubsemiring S) :=
srange_eq_top_iff_surjective.2 hf
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias srange_top_of_surjective := srange_eq_top_of_surjective
/-- If two non-unital ring homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its
non-unital subsemiring closure. -/
theorem eqOn_sclosure {f g : F} {s : Set R} (h : Set.EqOn (f : R → S) (g : R → S) s) :
Set.EqOn f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ eqSlocus f g from closure_le.2 h
theorem eq_of_eqOn_sdense {s : Set R} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : F}
(h : s.EqOn (f : R → S) (g : R → S)) : f = g :=
eq_of_eqOn_stop <| hs ▸ eqOn_sclosure h
theorem sclosure_preimage_le (f : F) (s : Set S) :
closure ((f : R → S) ⁻¹' s) ≤ (closure s).comap f :=
closure_le.2 fun _ hx => SetLike.mem_coe.2 <| mem_comap.2 <| subset_closure hx
/-- The image under a ring homomorphism of the subsemiring generated by a set equals
the subsemiring generated by the image of the set. -/
theorem map_sclosure (f : F) (s : Set R) : (closure s).map f = closure ((f : R → S) '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) (NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi S).gc
(NonUnitalSubsemiring.gi R).gc fun _ ↦ rfl
end NonUnitalRingHom
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
open NonUnitalRingHom NonUnitalSubsemiringClass
@[simp]
theorem srange_subtype (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) : NonUnitalRingHom.srange (subtype s) = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| (coe_srange _).trans Subtype.range_coe
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S]
@[simp]
theorem range_fst : NonUnitalRingHom.srange (fst R S) = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalRingHom.srange_eq_top_of_surjective (fst R S) Prod.fst_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_snd : NonUnitalRingHom.srange (snd R S) = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalRingHom.srange_eq_top_of_surjective (snd R S) <| Prod.snd_surjective
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
namespace RingEquiv
open NonUnitalRingHom NonUnitalSubsemiringClass
variable {s t : NonUnitalSubsemiring R}
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S] {F : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [NonUnitalRingHomClass F R S]
/-- Makes the identity isomorphism from a proof two non-unital subsemirings of a multiplicative
monoid are equal. -/
def nonUnitalSubsemiringCongr (h : s = t) : s ≃+* t :=
{ Equiv.setCongr <| congr_arg _ h with
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl }
/-- Restrict a non-unital ring homomorphism with a left inverse to a ring isomorphism to its
`NonUnitalRingHom.srange`. -/
def sofLeftInverse' {g : S → R} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) : R ≃+* srange f :=
{ srangeRestrict f with
toFun := srangeRestrict f
invFun := fun x => g (subtype (srange f) x)
left_inv := h
right_inv := fun x =>
Subtype.ext <|
let ⟨x', hx'⟩ := NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange.mp x.prop
show f (g x) = x by rw [← hx', h x'] }
@[simp]
theorem sofLeftInverse'_apply {g : S → R} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : R) :
↑(sofLeftInverse' h x) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sofLeftInverse'_symm_apply {g : S → R} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(x : srange f) : (sofLeftInverse' h).symm x = g x :=
rfl
/-- Given an equivalence `e : R ≃+* S` of non-unital semirings and a non-unital subsemiring
`s` of `R`, `non_unital_subsemiring_map e s` is the induced equivalence between `s` and
`s.map e` -/
@[simps!]
def nonUnitalSubsemiringMap (e : R ≃+* S) (s : NonUnitalSubsemiring R) :
s ≃+* NonUnitalSubsemiring.map e.toNonUnitalRingHom s :=
{ e.toAddEquiv.addSubmonoidMap s.toAddSubmonoid,
e.toMulEquiv.subsemigroupMap s.toSubsemigroup with }
end RingEquiv
| Mathlib/RingTheory/NonUnitalSubsemiring/Basic.lean | 865 | 867 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Maximal.Localization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Fröhlich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq, FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one, inv_eq]
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx, spanSingleton_one]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel₀, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
theorem isPrincipal_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)]
(h : I ≠ 0) : Submodule.IsPrincipal I⁻¹.1 := by
rw [val_eq_coe, isPrincipal_iff]
use (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹
have hI : I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_generator_self_inv _ I h
exact (right_inverse_eq _ I (spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹) hI).symm
variable {K}
lemma den_mem_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
(algebraMap R₁ K) (I.den : R₁) ∈ I⁻¹ := by
rw [mem_inv_iff hI]
intro i hi
rw [← Algebra.smul_def (I.den : R₁) i, ← mem_coe, coe_one]
suffices Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R₁ K) I.num ≤ 1 from
this <| (den_mul_self_eq_num I).symm ▸ smul_mem_pointwise_smul i I.den I.coeToSubmodule hi
apply le_trans <| map_mono (show I.num ≤ 1 by simp only [Ideal.one_eq_top, le_top, bot_eq_zero])
rw [Ideal.one_eq_top, Submodule.map_top, one_eq_range]
lemma num_le_mul_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I.num ≤ I * I⁻¹ := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, num_zero_eq <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R₁ K, zero_mul, zero_eq_bot,
coeIdeal_bot]
· rw [mul_comm, ← den_mul_self_eq_num']
exact mul_right_mono I <| spanSingleton_le_iff_mem.2 (den_mem_inv hI)
lemma bot_lt_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < I * I⁻¹ :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (coeIdeal_ne_zero.2 (hI ∘ num_eq_zero_iff.1)).bot_lt I.num_le_mul_inv
noncomputable instance : InvOneClass (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := { inv_one := div_one }
end FractionalIdeal
section IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [IsDomain A]
/-- A Dedekind domain is an integral domain such that every fractional ideal has an inverse.
This is equivalent to `IsDedekindDomain`.
In particular we provide a `fractional_ideal.comm_group_with_zero` instance,
assuming `IsDedekindDomain A`, which implies `IsDedekindDomainInv`. For **integral** ideals,
`IsDedekindDomain`(`_inv`) implies only `Ideal.cancelCommMonoidWithZero`.
-/
def IsDedekindDomainInv : Prop :=
∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)), I * I⁻¹ = 1
open FractionalIdeal
variable {R A K}
theorem isDedekindDomainInv_iff [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] :
IsDedekindDomainInv A ↔ ∀ I ≠ (⊥ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K), I * I⁻¹ = 1 := by
let h : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A) ≃+* FractionalIdeal A⁰ K :=
FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv (FractionRing.algEquiv A K)
refine h.toEquiv.forall_congr (fun {x} => ?_)
rw [← h.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
simp [h, IsDedekindDomainInv]
theorem FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (x : K)
(hx : IsIntegral A x) (hI : IsUnit (adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx)) : adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx = 1 := by
set I := adjoinIntegral A⁰ x hx
have mul_self : IsIdempotentElem I := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
simp only [coe_mul, adjoinIntegral_coe, I]
rw [(Algebra.adjoin A {x}).isIdempotentElem_toSubmodule]
convert congr_arg (· * I⁻¹) mul_self <;>
simp only [(mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit K).mpr hI, mul_assoc, mul_one]
namespace IsDedekindDomainInv
variable [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] (h : IsDedekindDomainInv A)
include h
theorem mul_inv_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
isDedekindDomainInv_iff.mp h I hI
theorem inv_mul_eq_one {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : I⁻¹ * I = 1 :=
(mul_comm _ _).trans (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
protected theorem isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) : IsUnit I :=
isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ (h.mul_inv_eq_one hI)
theorem isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A := by
refine isNoetherianRing_iff.mpr ⟨fun I : Ideal A => ?_⟩
by_cases hI : I = ⊥
· rw [hI]; apply Submodule.fg_bot
have hI : (I : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hI
exact I.fg_of_isUnit (IsFractionRing.injective A (FractionRing A)) (h.isUnit hI)
theorem integrallyClosed : IsIntegrallyClosed A := by
-- It suffices to show that for integral `x`,
-- `A[x]` (which is a fractional ideal) is in fact equal to `A`.
refine (isIntegrallyClosed_iff (FractionRing A)).mpr (fun {x hx} => ?_)
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← Algebra.mem_bot, ← Subalgebra.mem_toSubmodule, Algebra.toSubmodule_bot,
Submodule.one_eq_span, ← coe_spanSingleton A⁰ (1 : FractionRing A), spanSingleton_one, ←
FractionalIdeal.adjoinIntegral_eq_one_of_isUnit x hx (h.isUnit _)]
· exact mem_adjoinIntegral_self A⁰ x hx
· exact fun h => one_ne_zero (eq_zero_iff.mp h 1 (Algebra.adjoin A {x}).one_mem)
open Ring
theorem dimensionLEOne : DimensionLEOne A := ⟨by
-- We're going to show that `P` is maximal because any (maximal) ideal `M`
-- that is strictly larger would be `⊤`.
rintro P P_ne hP
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hP.ne_top, fun M hM => ?_⟩
-- We may assume `P` and `M` (as fractional ideals) are nonzero.
have P'_ne : (P : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr P_ne
have M'_ne : (M : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr hM.ne_bot
| -- In particular, we'll show `M⁻¹ * P ≤ P`
suffices (M⁻¹ : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) * P ≤ P by
rw [eq_top_iff, ← coeIdeal_le_coeIdeal (FractionRing A), coeIdeal_top]
calc
(1 : FractionalIdeal A⁰ (FractionRing A)) = _ * _ * _ := ?_
_ ≤ _ * _ := mul_right_mono
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 307 | 312 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
| alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 403 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Damiano Testa,
Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
/-!
# Ordered monoids
This file develops the basics of ordered monoids.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
## Remark
Almost no monoid is actually present in this file: most assumptions have been generalized to
`Mul` or `MulOneClass`.
-/
-- TODO: If possible, uniformize lemma names, taking special care of `'`,
-- after the `ordered`-refactor is done.
open Function
section Nat
instance Nat.instMulLeftMono : MulLeftMono ℕ where
elim := fun _ _ _ h => mul_le_mul_left _ h
end Nat
section Int
instance Int.instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono ℤ where
elim := fun _ _ _ h => Int.add_le_add_left h _
end Int
variable {α β : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul α]
section LE
variable [LE α]
/- The prime on this lemma is present only on the multiplicative version. The unprimed version
is taken by the analogous lemma for semiring, with an extra non-negativity assumption. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add_left]
theorem mul_le_mul_left' [MulLeftMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b ≤ c) (a : α) :
a * b ≤ a * c :=
CovariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive le_of_add_le_add_left]
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left' [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(bc : a * b ≤ a * c) :
b ≤ c :=
ContravariantClass.elim _ bc
/- The prime on this lemma is present only on the multiplicative version. The unprimed version
is taken by the analogous lemma for semiring, with an extra non-negativity assumption. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add_right]
theorem mul_le_mul_right' [i : MulRightMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b ≤ c)
(a : α) :
b * a ≤ c * a :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive le_of_add_le_add_right]
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_right' [i : MulRightReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(bc : b * a ≤ c * a) :
b ≤ c :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_right [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
b * a ≤ c * a ↔ b ≤ c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) a
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (· * ·) (· < ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_right [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
b * a < c * a ↔ b < c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_lt_add_left]
theorem mul_lt_mul_left' [MulLeftStrictMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b < c) (a : α) :
a * b < a * c :=
CovariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive lt_of_add_lt_add_left]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b c : α}
(bc : a * b < a * c) :
b < c :=
ContravariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_lt_add_right]
theorem mul_lt_mul_right' [i : MulRightStrictMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b < c)
(a : α) :
b * a < c * a :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive lt_of_add_lt_add_right]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' [i : MulRightReflectLT α] {a b c : α}
(bc : b * a < c * a) :
b < c :=
i.elim a bc
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_mono [MulLeftMono α] {a : α} : Monotone (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_le_mul_left' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_mono [MulRightMono α] {a : α} : Monotone (· * a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_le_mul_right' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_strictMono [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a : α} : StrictMono (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_lt_mul_left' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_strictMono [MulRightStrictMono α] {a : α} : StrictMono (· * a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_lt_mul_right' h _
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α]
{a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) : a * c < b * d :=
calc
a * c < a * d := mul_lt_mul_left' h₂ a
_ < b * d := mul_lt_mul_right' h₁ d
alias add_lt_add := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_right' h₁ _).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_left' h₂ b)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_left' h₂ _).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_right' h₁ d)
/-- Only assumes left strict covariance. -/
@[to_additive "Only assumes left strict covariance"]
theorem Left.mul_lt_mul [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h₁.le h₂
/-- Only assumes right strict covariance. -/
@[to_additive "Only assumes right strict covariance"]
theorem Right.mul_lt_mul [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h₁ h₂.le
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add]
theorem mul_le_mul' [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α]
{a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
a * c ≤ b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_left' h₂ _).trans (mul_le_mul_right' h₁ d)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_mul_three [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d e f : α} (h₁ : a ≤ d) (h₂ : b ≤ e)
(h₃ : c ≤ f) :
a * b * c ≤ d * e * f :=
mul_le_mul' (mul_le_mul' h₁ h₂) h₃
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b < c)
(hle : d ≤ b) :
a * d < c :=
(mul_le_mul_left' hle a).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ≤ c)
(hle : d ≤ b) :
a * d ≤ c :=
@act_rel_of_rel_of_act_rel _ _ _ (· ≤ ·) _ _ a _ _ _ hle h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a * b < c) (hle : d ≤ a) :
d * b < c :=
(mul_le_mul_right' hle b).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : d ≤ a) :
d * b ≤ c :=
(mul_le_mul_right' hle b).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a < b * c)
(hle : c ≤ d) :
a < b * d :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' hle b)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a ≤ b * c)
(hle : c ≤ d) :
a ≤ b * d :=
@rel_act_of_rel_of_rel_act _ _ _ (· ≤ ·) _ _ b _ _ _ hle h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a < b * c) (hle : b ≤ d) :
a < d * c :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' hle c)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ d) :
a ≤ d * c :=
h.trans (mul_le_mul_right' hle c)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_cancel'' [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b = a * c) :
b = c :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.le).antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.ge)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_cancel'' [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b = c * b) :
a = c :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.le).antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.ge)
@[to_additive] lemma mul_le_mul_iff_of_ge [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
a₂ * b₂ ≤ a₁ * b₁ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
haveI := mulLeftMono_of_mulLeftStrictMono α
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
exacts [mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le ha hb, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt ha hb]
@[to_additive] theorem mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) :
a * b = c * d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
haveI := mulLeftMono_of_mulLeftStrictMono α
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
rw [le_antisymm_iff, eq_true (mul_le_mul' hac hbd), true_and, mul_le_mul_iff_of_ge hac hbd]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_inj_of_comparable [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b) :
c * a = b * a ↔ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, (· ▸ rfl)⟩
contrapose h'
obtain h | h := h
· exact mul_lt_mul_right' (h.lt_of_ne' h') a |>.ne'
· exact mul_lt_mul_right' (h.lt_of_ne h') a |>.ne
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_inj_of_comparable [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b) :
a * c = a * b ↔ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, (· ▸ rfl)⟩
contrapose h'
obtain h | h := h
· exact mul_lt_mul_left' (h.lt_of_ne' h') a |>.ne'
· exact mul_lt_mul_left' (h.lt_of_ne h') a |>.ne
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem trichotomy_of_mul_eq_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b = c * d) : (a = c ∧ b = d) ∨ a < c ∨ b < d := by
obtain hac | rfl | hca := lt_trichotomy a c
· right; left; exact hac
· left; simpa using mul_right_inj_of_comparable (LinearOrder.le_total d b)|>.1 h
· obtain hbd | rfl | hdb := lt_trichotomy b d
· right; right; exact hbd
· exact False.elim <| ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_right' hca b) h.symm
· exact False.elim <| ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt hca hdb) h.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_max [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) := mul_left_mono.map_max
@[to_additive]
lemma max_mul [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) := mul_right_mono.map_max
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_min [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
a * min b c = min (a * b) (a * c) := mul_left_mono.map_min
@[to_additive]
lemma min_mul [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
min a b * c = min (a * c) (b * c) := mul_right_mono.map_min
@[to_additive] lemma min_lt_max_of_mul_lt_mul
[MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α]
(h : a * b < c * d) : min a b < max c d := by
simp_rw [min_lt_iff, lt_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_le_mul' h.1.1 h.2.2
@[to_additive] lemma Left.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d := by
simp_rw [min_le_iff, le_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h.1.1.le h.2.2
@[to_additive] lemma Right.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d := by
simp_rw [min_le_iff, le_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h.1.1 h.2.2.le
@[to_additive] lemma min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d :=
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
Left.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul h
/-- Not an instance, to avoid loops with `IsLeftCancelMul.mulLeftStrictMono_of_mulLeftMono`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem MulLeftStrictMono.toIsLeftCancelMul [MulLeftStrictMono α] : IsLeftCancelMul α where
mul_left_cancel _ _ _ h := mul_left_strictMono.injective h
/-- Not an instance, to avoid loops with `IsRightCancelMul.mulRightStrictMono_of_mulRightMono`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem MulRightStrictMono.toIsRightCancelMul [MulRightStrictMono α] : IsRightCancelMul α where
mul_right_cancel _ _ _ h := mul_right_strictMono.injective h
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive max_add_add_le_max_add_max]
theorem max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max' : max (a * b) (c * d) ≤ max a c * max b d :=
max_le (mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) <| le_max_left _ _) <|
mul_le_mul' (le_max_right _ _) <| le_max_right _ _
@[to_additive min_add_min_le_min_add_add]
theorem min_mul_min_le_min_mul_mul' : min a c * min b d ≤ min (a * b) (c * d) :=
le_min (mul_le_mul' (min_le_left _ _) <| min_le_left _ _) <|
mul_le_mul' (min_le_right _ _) <| min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end Mul
-- using one
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α]
section LE
variable [LE α]
@[to_additive le_add_of_nonneg_right]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_right' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (h : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ a * b :=
calc
a = a * 1 := (mul_one a).symm
_ ≤ a * b := mul_le_mul_left' h a
@[to_additive add_le_of_nonpos_right]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_right' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (h : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ a :=
calc
a * b ≤ a * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' h a
_ = a := mul_one a
@[to_additive le_add_of_nonneg_left]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_left' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (h : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ b * a :=
calc
a = 1 * a := (one_mul a).symm
_ ≤ b * a := mul_le_mul_right' h a
@[to_additive add_le_of_nonpos_left]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_left' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (h : b ≤ 1) :
b * a ≤ a :=
calc
b * a ≤ 1 * a := mul_le_mul_right' h a
_ = a := one_mul a
@[to_additive]
theorem one_le_of_le_mul_right [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ a * b) :
1 ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_one_of_mul_le_right [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b : α} (h : a * b ≤ a) :
b ≤ 1 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_le_of_le_mul_left [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α}
(h : b ≤ a * b) :
1 ≤ a :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_one_of_mul_le_left [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α}
(h : a * b ≤ b) :
a ≤ 1 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_right' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_left' [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_iff_right a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_le_iff_nonpos_right]
theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_right' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_le_iff_nonpos_left]
theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_left' [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α} :
a * b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_iff_right b)
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α]
@[to_additive lt_add_of_pos_right]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α} (h : 1 < b) :
a < a * b :=
calc
a = a * 1 := (mul_one a).symm
_ < a * b := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
@[to_additive add_lt_of_neg_right]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α} (h : b < 1) :
a * b < a :=
calc
a * b < a * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
_ = a := mul_one a
@[to_additive lt_add_of_pos_left]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_left' [MulRightStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α}
(h : 1 < b) :
a < b * a :=
calc
a = 1 * a := (one_mul a).symm
_ < b * a := mul_lt_mul_right' h a
@[to_additive add_lt_of_neg_left]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_left' [MulRightStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α}
(h : b < 1) :
b * a < a :=
calc
b * a < 1 * a := mul_lt_mul_right' h a
_ = a := one_mul a
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_of_lt_mul_right [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} (h : a < a * b) :
1 < b :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_one_of_mul_lt_right [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} (h : a * b < a) :
b < 1 :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_of_lt_mul_left [MulRightReflectLT α] {a b : α}
(h : b < a * b) :
1 < a :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_one_of_mul_lt_left [MulRightReflectLT α] {a b : α}
(h : a * b < b) :
a < 1 :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) lt_add_iff_pos_right]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a < a * b ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) lt_add_iff_pos_left]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left' [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] (a : α) {b : α} : a < b * a ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_right a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_lt_iff_neg_left]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} :
a * b < a ↔ b < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_lt_iff_neg_right]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right' [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] {a : α} (b : α) : a * b < b ↔ a < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_right b)
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-! Lemmas of the form `b ≤ c → a ≤ 1 → b * a ≤ c`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_le_of_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a ≤ 1) :
b * a ≤ c :=
calc
b * a ≤ b * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_le_of_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a < b * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a ≤ 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a ≤ b * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ < c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a < b * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ < c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one' [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one hbc ha.le
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_nonpos`."]
theorem Left.mul_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_of_le_of_le_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_le_of_lt_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one'`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg'`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `b ≤ c → 1 ≤ a → b ≤ c * a`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : 1 ≤ a) :
b ≤ c * a :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ ≤ c * a := mul_le_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ < c * a := mul_lt_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 ≤ a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ ≤ c * a := mul_le_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ < c * a := mul_lt_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le hbc ha.le
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_le_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_nonneg "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_nonneg`."]
theorem Left.one_le_mul [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 ≤ a * b :=
le_mul_of_le_of_one_le ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul'`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos' "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos'`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `a ≤ 1 → b ≤ c → a * b ≤ c`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_of_le [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
a * b ≤ c :=
calc
a * b ≤ 1 * b := mul_le_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b < 1 * b := mul_lt_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b ≤ 1 * b := mul_le_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ < c := hb
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b < 1 * b := mul_lt_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ < c := hb
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt' [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hbc : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt ha.le hbc
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_nonpos`."]
theorem Right.mul_le_one [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_of_le_one_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : a < 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one'`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg'`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `1 ≤ a → b ≤ c → b ≤ a * c`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_of_le [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
b ≤ a * c :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ ≤ a * c := mul_le_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ < a * c := mul_lt_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ ≤ a * c := mul_le_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ < a * c := mul_lt_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt' [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt ha.le hbc
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_le_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_nonneg "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_nonneg`."]
theorem Right.one_le_mul [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 ≤ a * b :=
le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul'`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos' "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos'`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt' ha hb
alias mul_le_one' := Left.mul_le_one
alias mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt := Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt
alias mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le := Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le
alias mul_lt_one := Left.mul_lt_one
alias mul_lt_one' := Left.mul_lt_one'
attribute [to_additive add_nonpos "**Alias** of `Left.add_nonpos`."] mul_le_one'
attribute [to_additive add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt
attribute [to_additive add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le
attribute [to_additive "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg`."] mul_lt_one
attribute [to_additive "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg'`."] mul_lt_one'
alias one_le_mul := Left.one_le_mul
alias one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt' := Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt
alias one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' := Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le
alias one_lt_mul' := Left.one_lt_mul
alias one_lt_mul'' := Left.one_lt_mul'
attribute [to_additive add_nonneg "**Alias** of `Left.add_nonneg`."] one_le_mul
attribute [to_additive add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt'
attribute [to_additive add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le'
attribute [to_additive add_pos "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos`."] one_lt_mul'
attribute [to_additive add_pos' "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos'`."] one_lt_mul''
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_of_one_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b < c)
(hle : 1 ≤ b) :
a < c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_right' hle).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_one_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b ≤ c)
(hle : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_right' hle).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_lt_mul_of_le_one_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a < b * c)
(hle : c ≤ 1) :
a < b :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_of_le_one_right' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_le_mul_of_le_one_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a ≤ b * c)
(hle : c ≤ 1) :
a ≤ b :=
h.trans (mul_le_of_le_one_right' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_of_one_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b < c) (hle : 1 ≤ a) :
b < c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_left' hle).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_one_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : 1 ≤ a) :
b ≤ c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_left' hle).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_lt_mul_of_le_one_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a < b * c) (hle : b ≤ 1) :
a < c :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_of_le_one_left' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_le_mul_of_le_one_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ 1) :
a ≤ c :=
h.trans (mul_le_of_le_one_left' hle)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hab : a * b = 1 =>
have : a ≤ 1 := hab ▸ le_mul_of_le_of_one_le le_rfl hb
have : a = 1 := le_antisymm this ha
have : b ≤ 1 := hab ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ha le_rfl
have : b = 1 := le_antisymm this hb
And.intro ‹a = 1› ‹b = 1›)
(by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rw [mul_one])
section Left
variable [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_add_nonneg_left]
theorem eq_one_of_one_le_mul_left (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) (hab : 1 ≤ a * b) : a = 1 :=
ha.eq_of_not_lt fun h => hab.not_lt <| mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le h hb
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_of_mul_le_one_left (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (hab : a * b ≤ 1) : a = 1 :=
ha.eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.not_lt <| one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' h hb
end Left
section Right
variable [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_add_nonneg_right]
theorem eq_one_of_one_le_mul_right (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) (hab : 1 ≤ a * b) : b = 1 :=
hb.eq_of_not_lt fun h => hab.not_lt <| Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt ha h
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_of_mul_le_one_right (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (hab : a * b ≤ 1) : b = 1 :=
hb.eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.not_lt <| Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt ha h
end Right
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem exists_square_le [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) : ∃ b : α, b * b ≤ a := by
by_cases h : a < 1
· use a
have : a * a < a * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
rw [mul_one] at this
exact le_of_lt this
· use 1
push_neg at h
rwa [mul_one]
end LinearOrder
end MulOneClass
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
/- This is not instance, since we want to have an instance from `LeftCancelSemigroup`s
to the appropriate covariant class. -/
/-- A semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `LeftCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `a * c < b * c → a < b`) is a `LeftCancelSemigroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `AddLeftCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `c + a < c + b → a < b`) is a `AddLeftCancelSemigroup`."]
def Contravariant.toLeftCancelSemigroup [MulLeftReflectLE α] :
LeftCancelSemigroup α :=
{ ‹Semigroup α› with mul_left_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_left_cancel'' }
/- This is not instance, since we want to have an instance from `RightCancelSemigroup`s
to the appropriate covariant class. -/
/-- A semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `RightCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `a * c < b * c → a < b`) is a `RightCancelSemigroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `AddRightCancelSemigroup`
(`a + c < b + c → a < b`) is a `AddRightCancelSemigroup`."]
def Contravariant.toRightCancelSemigroup [MulRightReflectLE α] :
RightCancelSemigroup α :=
{ ‹Semigroup α› with mul_right_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_right_cancel'' }
end PartialOrder
end Semigroup
section Mono
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β}
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem Monotone.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (a : α) : Monotone fun x ↦ a * f x :=
mul_left_mono.comp hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem MonotoneOn.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (a : α) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => a * f x) s := mul_left_mono.comp_monotoneOn hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem Antitone.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (a : α) : Antitone fun x ↦ a * f x :=
mul_left_mono.comp_antitone hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem AntitoneOn.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (a : α) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => a * f x) s := mul_left_mono.comp_antitoneOn hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem Monotone.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (a : α) :
Monotone fun x => f x * a := mul_right_mono.comp hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (a : α) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x * a) s := mul_right_mono.comp_monotoneOn hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem Antitone.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (a : α) : Antitone fun x ↦ f x * a :=
mul_right_mono.comp_antitone hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (a : α) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x * a) s := mul_right_mono.comp_antitoneOn hf
/-- The product of two monotone functions is monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two monotone functions is monotone."]
theorem Monotone.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ h => mul_le_mul' (hf h) (hg h)
/-- The product of two monotone functions is monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two monotone functions is monotone."]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
mul_le_mul' (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h)
/-- The product of two antitone functions is antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two antitone functions is antitone."]
theorem Antitone.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ h => mul_le_mul' (hf h) (hg h)
/-- The product of two antitone functions is antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two antitone functions is antitone."]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_le_mul' (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h)
section Left
variable [MulLeftStrictMono α]
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictMono.const_mul' (hf : StrictMono f) (c : α) : StrictMono fun x => c * f x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictMonoOn.const_mul' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => c * f x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ha hb ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictAnti.const_mul' (hf : StrictAnti f) (c : α) : StrictAnti fun x => c * f x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictAntiOn.const_mul' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => c * f x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ha hb ab) c
end Left
section Right
variable [MulRightStrictMono α]
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictMono.mul_const' (hf : StrictMono f) (c : α) : StrictMono fun x => f x * c :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul_const' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * c) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ha hb ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictAnti.mul_const' (hf : StrictAnti f) (c : α) : StrictAnti fun x => f x * c :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul_const' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * c) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ha hb ab) c
end Right
/-- The product of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMono.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : StrictMono g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ ab =>
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ab) (hg ab)
| /-- The product of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (hg : StrictMonoOn g s) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ha hb ab) (hg ha hb ab)
/-- The product of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone."]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Unbundled/Basic.lean | 1,239 | 1,247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
/-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
variable [CharZero K]
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338
We name `hcycl` so it can be used as a named argument,
but since https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338, this is considered unused,
so we need to disable the linter. -/
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- The ring of integers of a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance _root_.IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p`-th
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
integralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
integralPowerBasis_gen (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem power_basis_int'_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.dim = φ p := by
rw [integralPowerBasis', integralPowerBasis_dim (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one]),
pow_one]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p ^ k` cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin' hζ.integralPowerBasis (RingOfIntegers.isIntegral _)
(by
simp only [integralPowerBasis_gen, toInteger]
convert Subalgebra.add_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ (⟨ζ - 1, _⟩ : 𝓞 K))
(Subalgebra.one_mem _)
· simp
· exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (by simp)) (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen =
⟨ζ - 1, Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ := by
simp [subOneIntegralPowerBasis]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger - 1 :=
-- The `unusedHavesSuffices` linter incorrectly thinks this `have` is unnecessary.
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `p ≠ 2` and `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ hp.out.one_lt (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
convert Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (PNat.pos _)) hodd
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ (by decide) (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
cases k
· convert Prime.neg Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_neg, map_ofNat]
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one, AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, OneMemClass.coe_one,
pow_zero]
using hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat
(by simp only [zero_add, pow_one, Nat.ofNat_pos]))
convert Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_two Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp))
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) : Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
by_cases htwo : p = 2
· subst htwo
apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow
· apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two htwo
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime' [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
Prime ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
convert zeta_sub_one_prime (k := 0) (by simpa only [zero_add, pow_one])
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime'
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) {s : ℕ} (hs : s ≤ k) (htwo : p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s - 1) = p ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_iff ℤ (Sₘ := K) (Rₘ := ℚ) rfl.le]
simp [hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two
(cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp only [PNat.pow_coe, gt_iff_lt, PNat.pos, pow_pos]))
hs htwo]
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ 2 ^ k - 1` in a `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is `(-2) ^ 2 ^ k`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {2 ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ 2 ^ k - 1) = (-2) ^ (2 : ℕ) ^ k := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {2 ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_iff ℤ (Sₘ := K) (Rₘ := ℚ) rfl.le]
simp [hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (pow_pos (by decide) _))]
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is `p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) {s : ℕ} (hs : s ≤ k) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s - 1) = p ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s := by
refine hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two hs (fun h ↦ hodd ?_)
suffices h : (p : ℕ) = 2 from PNat.coe_injective h
apply eq_of_prime_pow_eq hp.out.prime Nat.prime_two.prime (k - s).succ_pos
rw [pow_one]
exact congr_arg Subtype.val h
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
`p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1) = p := by
simpa only [pow_zero, pow_one] using
hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Nat.zero_le _) hodd
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is `p` if
`p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (h : p ≠ 2) : Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1) = p := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
| replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two h
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
a prime if `p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (htwo : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 404 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ #σ.support :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
theorem pow_prime_eq_one_iff {σ : Perm α} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] :
| σ ^ p = 1 ↔ ∀ c ∈ σ.cycleType, c = p := by
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, ← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun c ↦ ⟨fun hc h ↦ Or.resolve_left (hp.elim.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd c (hc h))
(Nat.ne_of_lt' (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType h)),
fun hc h ↦ by rw [hc h]⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 214 | 219 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
| theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 609 | 610 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SemiringInverse
/-!
# Determinant of a matrix
This file defines the determinant of a matrix, `Matrix.det`, and its essential properties.
## Main definitions
- `Matrix.det`: the determinant of a square matrix, as a sum over permutations
- `Matrix.detRowAlternating`: the determinant, as an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix
## Main results
- `det_mul`: the determinant of `A * B` is the product of determinants
- `det_zero_of_row_eq`: the determinant is zero if there is a repeated row
- `det_block_diagonal`: the determinant of a block diagonal matrix is a product
of the blocks' determinants
## Implementation notes
It is possible to configure `simp` to compute determinants. See the file
`MathlibTest/matrix.lean` for some examples.
-/
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
/-- `det` is an `AlternatingMap` in the rows of the matrix. -/
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
/-- The determinant of a matrix given by the Leibniz formula. -/
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
theorem det_eq_detp_sub_detp (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = M.detp 1 - M.detp (-1) := by
rw [det_apply, ← Equiv.sum_comp (Equiv.inv (Perm n)), ← ofSign_disjUnion, sum_disjUnion]
simp_rw [inv_apply, sign_inv, sub_eq_add_neg, detp, ← sum_neg_distrib]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun σ hσ ↦ ?_) <;>
rw [mem_ofSign.mp hσ, ← Equiv.prod_comp σ] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
obtain ⟨x, h3⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2)
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
ext
exact det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 0) : det A = 1 :=
haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
det_isEmpty
/-- If `n` has only one element, the determinant of an `n` by `n` matrix is just that element.
Although `Unique` implies `DecidableEq` and `Fintype`, the instances might
not be syntactically equal. Thus, we need to fill in the args explicitly. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_unique {n : Type*} [Unique n] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) :
det A = A default default := by simp [det_apply, univ_unique]
theorem det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n R) (k : n) :
det A = A k k := by
have := uniqueOfSubsingleton k
convert det_unique A
theorem det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) (k : n) :
det A = A k k :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
theorem det_mul_aux {M N : Matrix n n R} {p : n → n} (H : ¬Bijective p) :
(∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ x, M (σ x) (p x) * N (p x) x) = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, j, hpij, hij⟩ : ∃ i j, p i = p j ∧ i ≠ j := by
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_bijective, Injective] at H
push_neg at H
exact H
exact
sum_involution (fun σ _ => σ * Equiv.swap i j)
(fun σ _ => by
have : (∏ x, M (σ x) (p x)) = ∏ x, M ((σ * Equiv.swap i j) x) (p x) :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (swap i j) _ _ (by simp [apply_swap_eq_self hpij])
simp [this, sign_swap hij, -sign_swap', prod_mul_distrib])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr mul_swap_eq_iff).mpr hij) (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun σ _ =>
mul_swap_involutive i j σ
@[simp]
theorem det_mul (M N : Matrix n n R) : det (M * N) = det M * det N :=
calc
det (M * N) = ∑ p : n → n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
simp only [det_apply', mul_apply, prod_univ_sum, mul_sum, Fintype.piFinset_univ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ = ∑ p : n → n with Bijective p, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
refine (sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun f _ hbij ↦ det_mul_aux ?_).symm
simpa only [true_and, mem_filter, mem_univ] using hbij
_ = ∑ τ : Perm n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (τ i) * N (τ i) i :=
sum_bij (fun p h ↦ Equiv.ofBijective p (mem_filter.1 h).2) (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _)
(fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ by injection h)
(fun b _ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _, b.bijective⟩, coe_fn_injective rfl⟩) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * ε τ * ∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j) := by
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * (ε σ * ε τ) * ∏ i, M (τ i) i :=
(sum_congr rfl fun σ _ =>
Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.mulRight σ⁻¹) _ _ fun τ => by
have : (∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j)) = ∏ j, M ((τ * σ⁻¹) j) j := by
rw [← (σ⁻¹ : _ ≃ _).prod_comp]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, apply_inv_self, Function.comp_apply]
have h : ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε τ :=
calc
ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε (τ * σ⁻¹ * σ) := by
rw [mul_comm, sign_mul (τ * σ⁻¹)]
simp only [Int.cast_mul, Units.val_mul]
_ = ε τ := by simp only [inv_mul_cancel_right]
simp_rw [Equiv.coe_mulRight, h]
simp only [this])
_ = det M * det N := by
simp only [det_apply', Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
/-- The determinant of a matrix, as a monoid homomorphism. -/
def detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →* R where
toFun := det
map_one' := det_one
map_mul' := det_mul
@[simp]
theorem coe_detMonoidHom : (detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R → R) = det :=
rfl
/-- On square matrices, `mul_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_comm (M N : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_left_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_left_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * (N * P)) = det (N * (M * P)) := by
rw [← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm M N, ← det_mul]
/-- On square matrices, `mul_right_comm` applies under `det`. -/
theorem det_mul_right_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N * P) = det (M * P * N) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm N P, ← det_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M.val * N * M⁻¹.val) = det N := by
rw [det_mul_right_comm, Units.mul_inv, one_mul]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/6607): fix elaboration so `val` isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj' (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det (M⁻¹.val * N * ↑M.val) = det N :=
det_units_conj M⁻¹ N
/-- Transposing a matrix preserves the determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_transpose (M : Matrix n n R) : Mᵀ.det = M.det := by
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
refine Fintype.sum_bijective _ inv_involutive.bijective _ _ ?_
intro σ
rw [sign_inv]
congr 1
apply Fintype.prod_equiv σ
simp
/-- Permuting the columns changes the sign of the determinant. -/
theorem det_permute (σ : Perm n) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M.submatrix σ id).det = Perm.sign σ * M.det :=
((detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_perm M σ).trans (by simp [Units.smul_def])
/-- Permuting the rows changes the sign of the determinant. -/
theorem det_permute' (σ : Perm n) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M.submatrix id σ).det = Perm.sign σ * M.det := by
rw [← det_transpose, transpose_submatrix, det_permute, det_transpose]
/-- Permuting rows and columns with the same equivalence does not change the determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_submatrix_equiv_self (e : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m R) :
det (A.submatrix e e) = det A := by
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
apply Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.permCongr e)
intro σ
rw [Equiv.Perm.sign_permCongr e σ]
congr 1
apply Fintype.prod_equiv e
intro i
rw [Equiv.permCongr_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, submatrix_apply]
/-- Permuting rows and columns with two equivalences does not change the absolute value of the
determinant. -/
@[simp]
theorem abs_det_submatrix_equiv_equiv {R : Type*}
[CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(e₁ e₂ : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m R) :
|(A.submatrix e₁ e₂).det| = |A.det| := by
have hee : e₂ = e₁.trans (e₁.symm.trans e₂) := by ext; simp
rw [hee]
show |((A.submatrix id (e₁.symm.trans e₂)).submatrix e₁ e₁).det| = |A.det|
rw [Matrix.det_submatrix_equiv_self, Matrix.det_permute', abs_mul, abs_unit_intCast, one_mul]
/-- Reindexing both indices along the same equivalence preserves the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `det_submatrix_equiv_self`; this one is unsuitable because
`Matrix.reindex_apply` unfolds `reindex` first.
-/
theorem det_reindex_self (e : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m R) : det (reindex e e A) = det A :=
det_submatrix_equiv_self e.symm A
/-- Reindexing both indices along equivalences preserves the absolute of the determinant.
For the `simp` version of this lemma, see `abs_det_submatrix_equiv_equiv`;
this one is unsuitable because `Matrix.reindex_apply` unfolds `reindex` first.
-/
theorem abs_det_reindex {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(e₁ e₂ : m ≃ n) (A : Matrix m m R) :
|det (reindex e₁ e₂ A)| = |det A| :=
abs_det_submatrix_equiv_equiv e₁.symm e₂.symm A
theorem det_smul (A : Matrix n n R) (c : R) : det (c • A) = c ^ Fintype.card n * det A :=
calc
det (c • A) = det ((diagonal fun _ => c) * A) := by rw [smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
_ = det (diagonal fun _ => c) * det A := det_mul _ _
_ = c ^ Fintype.card n * det A := by simp
@[simp]
theorem det_smul_of_tower {α} [Monoid α] [MulAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass α R R] (c : α) (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (c • A) = c ^ Fintype.card n • det A := by
rw [← smul_one_smul R c A, det_smul, smul_pow, one_pow, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
theorem det_neg (A : Matrix n n R) : det (-A) = (-1) ^ Fintype.card n * det A := by
rw [← det_smul, neg_one_smul]
/-- A variant of `Matrix.det_neg` with scalar multiplication by `Units ℤ` instead of multiplication
by `R`. -/
theorem det_neg_eq_smul (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (-A) = (-1 : Units ℤ) ^ Fintype.card n • det A := by
rw [← det_smul_of_tower, Units.neg_smul, one_smul]
/-- Multiplying each row by a fixed `v i` multiplies the determinant by
the product of the `v`s. -/
theorem det_mul_row (v : n → R) (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (of fun i j => v j * A i j) = (∏ i, v i) * det A :=
calc
det (of fun i j => v j * A i j) = det (A * diagonal v) :=
congr_arg det <| by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
_ = (∏ i, v i) * det A := by rw [det_mul, det_diagonal, mul_comm]
/-- Multiplying each column by a fixed `v j` multiplies the determinant by
the product of the `v`s. -/
theorem det_mul_column (v : n → R) (A : Matrix n n R) :
det (of fun i j => v i * A i j) = (∏ i, v i) * det A :=
MultilinearMap.map_smul_univ _ v A
@[simp]
theorem det_pow (M : Matrix m m R) (n : ℕ) : det (M ^ n) = det M ^ n :=
(detMonoidHom : Matrix m m R →* R).map_pow M n
section HomMap
variable {S : Type w} [CommRing S]
theorem _root_.RingHom.map_det (f : R →+* S) (M : Matrix n n R) :
f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) := by
simp [Matrix.det_apply', map_sum f, map_prod f]
theorem _root_.RingEquiv.map_det (f : R ≃+* S) (M : Matrix n n R) :
f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toRingHom.map_det _
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_det [Algebra R S] {T : Type z} [CommRing T] [Algebra R T] (f : S →ₐ[R] T)
(M : Matrix n n S) : f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toRingHom.map_det _
theorem _root_.AlgEquiv.map_det [Algebra R S] {T : Type z} [CommRing T] [Algebra R T]
(f : S ≃ₐ[R] T) (M : Matrix n n S) : f M.det = Matrix.det (f.mapMatrix M) :=
f.toAlgHom.map_det _
@[norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Int.cast_det (M : Matrix n n ℤ) :
(M.det : R) = (M.map fun x ↦ (x : R)).det :=
Int.castRingHom R |>.map_det M
@[norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Rat.cast_det {F : Type*} [Field F] [CharZero F] (M : Matrix n n ℚ) :
(M.det : F) = (M.map fun x ↦ (x : F)).det :=
Rat.castHom F |>.map_det M
end HomMap
@[simp]
theorem det_conjTranspose [StarRing R] (M : Matrix m m R) : det Mᴴ = star (det M) :=
((starRingEnd R).map_det _).symm.trans <| congr_arg star M.det_transpose
section DetZero
/-!
### `det_zero` section
Prove that a matrix with a repeated column has determinant equal to zero.
-/
theorem det_eq_zero_of_row_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (i : n) (h : ∀ j, A i j = 0) : det A = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_coord_zero i (funext h)
theorem det_eq_zero_of_column_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (j : n) (h : ∀ i, A i j = 0) :
det A = 0 := by
rw [← det_transpose]
exact det_eq_zero_of_row_eq_zero j h
variable {M : Matrix n n R} {i j : n}
/-- If a matrix has a repeated row, the determinant will be zero. -/
theorem det_zero_of_row_eq (i_ne_j : i ≠ j) (hij : M i = M j) : M.det = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_eq_zero_of_eq M hij i_ne_j
/-- If a matrix has a repeated column, the determinant will be zero. -/
theorem det_zero_of_column_eq (i_ne_j : i ≠ j) (hij : ∀ k, M k i = M k j) : M.det = 0 := by
rw [← det_transpose, det_zero_of_row_eq i_ne_j]
exact funext hij
/-- If we repeat a row of a matrix, we get a matrix of determinant zero. -/
theorem det_updateRow_eq_zero (h : i ≠ j) :
(M.updateRow j (M i)).det = 0 := det_zero_of_row_eq h (by simp [h])
/-- If we repeat a column of a matrix, we get a matrix of determinant zero. -/
theorem det_updateCol_eq_zero (h : i ≠ j) :
(M.updateCol j (fun k ↦ M k i)).det = 0 := det_zero_of_column_eq h (by simp [h])
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_eq_zero := det_updateCol_eq_zero
end DetZero
theorem det_updateRow_add (M : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (u v : n → R) :
det (updateRow M j <| u + v) = det (updateRow M j u) + det (updateRow M j v) :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_update_add M j u v
theorem det_updateCol_add (M : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (u v : n → R) :
det (updateCol M j <| u + v) = det (updateCol M j u) + det (updateCol M j v) := by
rw [← det_transpose, ← updateRow_transpose, det_updateRow_add]
simp [updateRow_transpose, det_transpose]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_add := det_updateCol_add
theorem det_updateRow_smul (M : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (s : R) (u : n → R) :
det (updateRow M j <| s • u) = s * det (updateRow M j u) :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_update_smul M j s u
theorem det_updateCol_smul (M : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (s : R) (u : n → R) :
det (updateCol M j <| s • u) = s * det (updateCol M j u) := by
rw [← det_transpose, ← updateRow_transpose, det_updateRow_smul]
simp [updateRow_transpose, det_transpose]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_smul := det_updateCol_smul
theorem det_updateRow_smul_left (M : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (s : R) (u : n → R) :
det (updateRow (s • M) j u) = s ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) * det (updateRow M j u) :=
MultilinearMap.map_update_smul_left _ M j s u
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] alias det_updateRow_smul' := det_updateRow_smul_left
theorem det_updateCol_smul_left (M : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (s : R) (u : n → R) :
det (updateCol (s • M) j u) = s ^ (Fintype.card n - 1) * det (updateCol M j u) := by
rw [← det_transpose, ← updateRow_transpose, transpose_smul, det_updateRow_smul_left]
simp [updateRow_transpose, det_transpose]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_smul' := det_updateCol_smul_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_smul_left := det_updateCol_smul_left
theorem det_updateRow_sum_aux (M : Matrix n n R) {j : n} (s : Finset n) (hj : j ∉ s) (c : n → R)
(a : R) :
(M.updateRow j (a • M j + ∑ k ∈ s, (c k) • M k)).det = a • M.det := by
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => rw [Finset.sum_empty, add_zero, smul_eq_mul, det_updateRow_smul, updateRow_eq_self]
| insert k _ hk h_ind =>
have h : k ≠ j := fun h ↦ (h ▸ hj) (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
rw [Finset.sum_insert hk, add_comm ((c k) • M k), ← add_assoc, det_updateRow_add,
det_updateRow_smul, det_updateRow_eq_zero h, mul_zero, add_zero, h_ind]
exact fun h ↦ hj (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem h)
/-- If we replace a row of a matrix by a linear combination of its rows, then the determinant is
multiplied by the coefficient of that row. -/
theorem det_updateRow_sum (A : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (c : n → R) :
(A.updateRow j (∑ k, (c k) • A k)).det = (c j) • A.det := by
convert det_updateRow_sum_aux A (Finset.univ.erase j) (Finset.univ.not_mem_erase j) c (c j)
rw [← Finset.univ.add_sum_erase _ (Finset.mem_univ j)]
/-- If we replace a column of a matrix by a linear combination of its columns, then the determinant
is multiplied by the coefficient of that column. -/
theorem det_updateCol_sum (A : Matrix n n R) (j : n) (c : n → R) :
(A.updateCol j (fun k ↦ ∑ i, (c i) • A k i)).det = (c j) • A.det := by
rw [← det_transpose, ← updateRow_transpose, ← det_transpose A]
convert det_updateRow_sum A.transpose j c
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Finset.sum_apply, Pi.smul_apply, transpose_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_sum := det_updateCol_sum
section DetEq
/-! ### `det_eq` section
Lemmas showing the determinant is invariant under a variety of operations.
-/
theorem det_eq_of_eq_mul_det_one {A B : Matrix n n R} (C : Matrix n n R) (hC : det C = 1)
(hA : A = B * C) : det A = det B :=
calc
det A = det (B * C) := congr_arg _ hA
_ = det B * det C := det_mul _ _
_ = det B := by rw [hC, mul_one]
theorem det_eq_of_eq_det_one_mul {A B : Matrix n n R} (C : Matrix n n R) (hC : det C = 1)
(hA : A = C * B) : det A = det B :=
calc
det A = det (C * B) := congr_arg _ hA
_ = det C * det B := det_mul _ _
_ = det B := by rw [hC, one_mul]
theorem det_updateRow_add_self (A : Matrix n n R) {i j : n} (hij : i ≠ j) :
det (updateRow A i (A i + A j)) = det A := by
simp [det_updateRow_add,
det_zero_of_row_eq hij (updateRow_self.trans (updateRow_ne hij.symm).symm)]
theorem det_updateCol_add_self (A : Matrix n n R) {i j : n} (hij : i ≠ j) :
det (updateCol A i fun k => A k i + A k j) = det A := by
rw [← det_transpose, ← updateRow_transpose, ← det_transpose A]
exact det_updateRow_add_self Aᵀ hij
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")] alias det_updateColumn_add_self := det_updateCol_add_self
theorem det_updateRow_add_smul_self (A : Matrix n n R) {i j : n} (hij : i ≠ j) (c : R) :
det (updateRow A i (A i + c • A j)) = det A := by
simp [det_updateRow_add, det_updateRow_smul,
det_zero_of_row_eq hij (updateRow_self.trans (updateRow_ne hij.symm).symm)]
theorem det_updateCol_add_smul_self (A : Matrix n n R) {i j : n} (hij : i ≠ j) (c : R) :
det (updateCol A i fun k => A k i + c • A k j) = det A := by
rw [← det_transpose, ← updateRow_transpose, ← det_transpose A]
exact det_updateRow_add_smul_self Aᵀ hij c
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")]
alias det_updateColumn_add_smul_self := det_updateCol_add_smul_self
theorem linearIndependent_rows_of_det_ne_zero [IsDomain R] {A : Matrix m m R} (hA : A.det ≠ 0) :
LinearIndependent R A.row := by
rw [row_def]
contrapose! hA
obtain ⟨c, hc0, i, hci⟩ := Fintype.not_linearIndependent_iff.1 hA
have h0 := A.det_updateRow_sum i c
rwa [det_eq_zero_of_row_eq_zero (i := i) (fun j ↦ by simp [hc0]), smul_eq_mul, eq_comm,
mul_eq_zero_iff_left hci] at h0
theorem linearIndependent_cols_of_det_ne_zero [IsDomain R] {A : Matrix m m R} (hA : A.det ≠ 0) :
LinearIndependent R A.col :=
Matrix.linearIndependent_rows_of_det_ne_zero (by simpa)
theorem det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_const_aux {A B : Matrix n n R} {s : Finset n} :
∀ (c : n → R) (_ : ∀ i, i ∉ s → c i = 0) (k : n) (_ : k ∉ s)
(_ : ∀ i j, A i j = B i j + c i * B k j), det A = det B := by
induction s using Finset.induction_on generalizing B with
| empty =>
rintro c hs k - A_eq
have : ∀ i, c i = 0 := by
intro i
specialize hs i
contrapose! hs
simp [hs]
congr
ext i j
rw [A_eq, this, zero_mul, add_zero]
| insert i s _hi ih =>
intro c hs k hk A_eq
have hAi : A i = B i + c i • B k := funext (A_eq i)
rw [@ih (updateRow B i (A i)) (Function.update c i 0), hAi, det_updateRow_add_smul_self]
· exact mt (fun h => show k ∈ insert i s from h ▸ Finset.mem_insert_self _ _) hk
· intro i' hi'
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs with hi'i
· rfl
· exact hs i' fun h => hi' ((Finset.mem_insert.mp h).resolve_left hi'i)
· exact k
· exact fun h => hk (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem h)
· intro i' j'
rw [updateRow_apply, Function.update_apply]
split_ifs with hi'i
· simp [hi'i]
rw [A_eq, updateRow_ne fun h : k = i => hk <| h ▸ Finset.mem_insert_self k s]
/-- If you add multiples of row `B k` to other rows, the determinant doesn't change. -/
theorem det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_const {A B : Matrix n n R} (c : n → R) (k : n)
(hk : c k = 0) (A_eq : ∀ i j, A i j = B i j + c i * B k j) : det A = det B :=
det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_const_aux c
(fun i =>
not_imp_comm.mp fun hi =>
Finset.mem_erase.mpr
⟨mt (fun h : i = k => show c i = 0 from h.symm ▸ hk) hi, Finset.mem_univ i⟩)
k (Finset.not_mem_erase k Finset.univ) A_eq
theorem det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_pred_aux {n : ℕ} (k : Fin (n + 1)) :
∀ (c : Fin n → R) (_hc : ∀ i : Fin n, k < i.succ → c i = 0)
{M N : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) R} (_h0 : ∀ j, M 0 j = N 0 j)
(_hsucc : ∀ (i : Fin n) (j), M i.succ j = N i.succ j + c i * M (Fin.castSucc i) j),
det M = det N := by
refine Fin.induction ?_ (fun k ih => ?_) k <;> intro c hc M N h0 hsucc
· congr
ext i j
refine Fin.cases (h0 j) (fun i => ?_) i
rw [hsucc, hc i (Fin.succ_pos _), zero_mul, add_zero]
set M' := updateRow M k.succ (N k.succ) with hM'
have hM : M = updateRow M' k.succ (M' k.succ + c k • M (Fin.castSucc k)) := by
ext i j
by_cases hi : i = k.succ
· simp [hi, hM', hsucc, updateRow_self]
rw [updateRow_ne hi, hM', updateRow_ne hi]
have k_ne_succ : (Fin.castSucc k) ≠ k.succ := (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ k).ne
have M_k : M (Fin.castSucc k) = M' (Fin.castSucc k) := (updateRow_ne k_ne_succ).symm
rw [hM, M_k, det_updateRow_add_smul_self M' k_ne_succ.symm, ih (Function.update c k 0)]
· intro i hi
rw [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_succ, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hi
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs with hik
· rfl
exact hc _ (Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr (lt_of_le_of_ne hi (Ne.symm hik)))
· rwa [hM', updateRow_ne (Fin.succ_ne_zero _).symm]
intro i j
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs with hik
· rw [zero_mul, add_zero, hM', hik, updateRow_self]
rw [hM', updateRow_ne ((Fin.succ_injective _).ne hik), hsucc]
by_cases hik2 : k < i
· simp [hc i (Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr hik2)]
rw [updateRow_ne]
apply ne_of_lt
rwa [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_succ, Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← not_lt]
/-- If you add multiples of previous rows to the next row, the determinant doesn't change. -/
theorem det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_pred {n : ℕ} {A B : Matrix (Fin (n + 1)) (Fin (n + 1)) R}
(c : Fin n → R) (A_zero : ∀ j, A 0 j = B 0 j)
(A_succ : ∀ (i : Fin n) (j), A i.succ j = B i.succ j + c i * A (Fin.castSucc i) j) :
det A = det B :=
det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_pred_aux (Fin.last _) c
(fun _ hi => absurd hi (not_lt_of_ge (Fin.le_last _))) A_zero A_succ
/-- If you add multiples of previous columns to the next columns, the determinant doesn't change. -/
theorem det_eq_of_forall_col_eq_smul_add_pred {n : ℕ} {A B : Matrix (Fin (n + 1)) (Fin (n + 1)) R}
(c : Fin n → R) (A_zero : ∀ i, A i 0 = B i 0)
(A_succ : ∀ (i) (j : Fin n), A i j.succ = B i j.succ + c j * A i (Fin.castSucc j)) :
det A = det B := by
rw [← det_transpose A, ← det_transpose B]
exact det_eq_of_forall_row_eq_smul_add_pred c A_zero fun i j => A_succ j i
end DetEq
@[simp]
theorem det_blockDiagonal {o : Type*} [Fintype o] [DecidableEq o] (M : o → Matrix n n R) :
(blockDiagonal M).det = ∏ k, (M k).det := by
-- Rewrite the determinants as a sum over permutations.
simp_rw [det_apply']
-- The right hand side is a product of sums, rewrite it as a sum of products.
rw [Finset.prod_sum]
simp_rw [Finset.prod_attach_univ, Finset.univ_pi_univ]
-- We claim that the only permutations contributing to the sum are those that
-- preserve their second component.
let preserving_snd : Finset (Equiv.Perm (n × o)) := {σ | ∀ x, (σ x).snd = x.snd}
have mem_preserving_snd :
∀ {σ : Equiv.Perm (n × o)}, σ ∈ preserving_snd ↔ ∀ x, (σ x).snd = x.snd := fun {σ} =>
Finset.mem_filter.trans ⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => ⟨Finset.mem_univ _, h⟩⟩
rw [← Finset.sum_subset (Finset.subset_univ preserving_snd) _]
-- And that these are in bijection with `o → Equiv.Perm m`.
· refine (Finset.sum_bij (fun σ _ => prodCongrLeft fun k ↦ σ k (mem_univ k)) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro σ _
rw [mem_preserving_snd]
rintro ⟨-, x⟩
simp only [prodCongrLeft_apply]
· intro σ _ σ' _ eq
ext x hx k
simp only at eq
have :
∀ k x,
prodCongrLeft (fun k => σ k (Finset.mem_univ _)) (k, x) =
prodCongrLeft (fun k => σ' k (Finset.mem_univ _)) (k, x) :=
fun k x => by rw [eq]
simp only [prodCongrLeft_apply, Prod.mk_inj] at this
exact (this k x).1
· intro σ hσ
rw [mem_preserving_snd] at hσ
have hσ' : ∀ x, (σ⁻¹ x).snd = x.snd := by
intro x
conv_rhs => rw [← Perm.apply_inv_self σ x, hσ]
have mk_apply_eq : ∀ k x, ((σ (x, k)).fst, k) = σ (x, k) := by
intro k x
ext
· simp only
· simp only [hσ]
have mk_inv_apply_eq : ∀ k x, ((σ⁻¹ (x, k)).fst, k) = σ⁻¹ (x, k) := by
intro k x
conv_lhs => rw [← Perm.apply_inv_self σ (x, k)]
ext
· simp only [apply_inv_self]
· simp only [hσ']
refine ⟨fun k _ => ⟨fun x => (σ (x, k)).fst, fun x => (σ⁻¹ (x, k)).fst, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro x
simp only [mk_apply_eq, inv_apply_self]
· intro x
simp only [mk_inv_apply_eq, apply_inv_self]
· apply Finset.mem_univ
· ext ⟨k, x⟩
· simp only [coe_fn_mk, prodCongrLeft_apply]
· simp only [prodCongrLeft_apply, hσ]
· intro σ _
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.univ_product_univ, Finset.prod_product_right]
simp only [sign_prodCongrLeft, Units.coe_prod, Int.cast_prod, blockDiagonal_apply_eq,
prodCongrLeft_apply]
· intro σ _ hσ
rw [mem_preserving_snd] at hσ
obtain ⟨⟨k, x⟩, hkx⟩ := not_forall.mp hσ
rw [Finset.prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_univ (k, x)), mul_zero]
rw [blockDiagonal_apply_ne]
exact hkx
/-- The determinant of a 2×2 block matrix with the lower-left block equal to zero is the product of
the determinants of the diagonal blocks. For the generalization to any number of blocks, see
`Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁ (A : Matrix m m R) (B : Matrix m n R) (D : Matrix n n R) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B 0 D).det = A.det * D.det := by
classical
simp_rw [det_apply']
convert Eq.symm <|
sum_subset (M := R) (subset_univ ((sumCongrHom m n).range : Set (Perm (m ⊕ n))).toFinset) ?_
· simp_rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product', univ_product_univ]
refine sum_nbij (fun σ ↦ σ.fst.sumCongr σ.snd) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro σ₁₂ _
simp
· intro σ₁ _ σ₂ _
dsimp only
intro h
have h2 : ∀ x, Perm.sumCongr σ₁.fst σ₁.snd x = Perm.sumCongr σ₂.fst σ₂.snd x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h
simp only [Sum.map_inr, Sum.map_inl, Perm.sumCongr_apply, Sum.forall, Sum.inl.injEq,
Sum.inr.injEq] at h2
ext x
· exact h2.left x
· exact h2.right x
· intro σ hσ
rw [mem_coe, Set.mem_toFinset] at hσ
obtain ⟨σ₁₂, hσ₁₂⟩ := hσ
use σ₁₂
rw [← hσ₁₂]
simp
· simp only [forall_prop_of_true, Prod.forall, mem_univ]
intro σ₁ σ₂
rw [Fintype.prod_sum_type]
simp_rw [Equiv.sumCongr_apply, Sum.map_inr, Sum.map_inl, fromBlocks_apply₁₁,
fromBlocks_apply₂₂]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
congr
rw [sign_sumCongr, Units.val_mul, Int.cast_mul]
· rintro σ - hσn
have h1 : ¬∀ x, ∃ y, Sum.inl y = σ (Sum.inl x) := by
rw [Set.mem_toFinset] at hσn
simpa only [Set.MapsTo, Set.mem_range, forall_exists_index, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff] using
mt mem_sumCongrHom_range_of_perm_mapsTo_inl hσn
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := not_forall.mp h1
rcases hx : σ (Sum.inl a) with a2 | b
· have hn := (not_exists.mp ha) a2
exact absurd hx.symm hn
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_univ (Sum.inl a)), mul_zero]
rw [hx, fromBlocks_apply₂₁, zero_apply]
/-- The determinant of a 2×2 block matrix with the upper-right block equal to zero is the product of
the determinants of the diagonal blocks. For the generalization to any number of blocks, see
`Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_zero₁₂ (A : Matrix m m R) (C : Matrix n m R) (D : Matrix n n R) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A 0 C D).det = A.det * D.det := by
rw [← det_transpose, fromBlocks_transpose, transpose_zero, det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_transpose,
det_transpose]
/-- Laplacian expansion of the determinant of an `n+1 × n+1` matrix along column 0. -/
theorem det_succ_column_zero {n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) R) :
det A = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, (-1) ^ (i : ℕ) * A i 0 * det (A.submatrix i.succAbove Fin.succ) := by
rw [Matrix.det_apply, Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ, ← Finset.univ_product_univ]
simp only [Finset.sum_map, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply, Finset.sum_product, Matrix.submatrix]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i _ => Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· simp only [Fin.prod_univ_succ, Matrix.det_apply, Finset.mul_sum,
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero, Fin.val_zero, one_mul,
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign, Equiv.swap_self, if_true, id, eq_self_iff_true,
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ, Fin.succAbove_zero, Equiv.coe_refl, pow_zero,
mul_smul_comm, of_apply]
-- `univ_perm_fin_succ` gives a different embedding of `Perm (Fin n)` into
-- `Perm (Fin n.succ)` than the determinant of the submatrix we want,
-- permute `A` so that we get the correct one.
have : (-1 : R) ^ (i : ℕ) = (Perm.sign i.cycleRange) := by simp [Fin.sign_cycleRange]
rw [Fin.val_succ, pow_succ', this, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (ε _),
← det_permute, Matrix.det_apply, Finset.mul_sum, Finset.mul_sum]
-- now we just need to move the corresponding parts to the same place
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun σ _ => ?_
rw [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign, if_neg (Fin.succ_ne_zero i)]
calc
((-1 * Perm.sign σ : ℤ) • ∏ i', A (Perm.decomposeFin.symm (Fin.succ i, σ) i') i') =
(-1 * Perm.sign σ : ℤ) • (A (Fin.succ i) 0 *
∏ i', A ((Fin.succ i).succAbove (Fin.cycleRange i (σ i'))) i'.succ) := by
simp only [Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.succAbove_cycleRange,
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ]
_ = -1 * (A (Fin.succ i) 0 * (Perm.sign σ : ℤ) •
∏ i', A ((Fin.succ i).succAbove (Fin.cycleRange i (σ i'))) i'.succ) := by
simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, _root_.neg_mul, one_mul, zsmul_eq_mul, neg_inj, neg_smul,
Fin.succAbove_cycleRange, mul_left_comm]
/-- Laplacian expansion of the determinant of an `n+1 × n+1` matrix along row 0. -/
theorem det_succ_row_zero {n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) R) :
det A = ∑ j : Fin n.succ, (-1) ^ (j : ℕ) * A 0 j * det (A.submatrix Fin.succ j.succAbove) := by
rw [← det_transpose A, det_succ_column_zero]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [← det_transpose]
simp only [transpose_apply, transpose_submatrix, transpose_transpose]
/-- Laplacian expansion of the determinant of an `n+1 × n+1` matrix along row `i`. -/
theorem det_succ_row {n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) R) (i : Fin n.succ) :
det A =
∑ j : Fin n.succ, (-1) ^ (i + j : ℕ) * A i j * det (A.submatrix i.succAbove j.succAbove) := by
simp_rw [pow_add, mul_assoc, ← mul_sum]
have : det A = (-1 : R) ^ (i : ℕ) * (Perm.sign i.cycleRange⁻¹) * det A := by
calc
det A = ↑((-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (i : ℕ) * (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (i : ℕ) : ℤˣ) * det A := by simp
_ = (-1 : R) ^ (i : ℕ) * (Perm.sign i.cycleRange⁻¹) * det A := by simp [-Int.units_mul_self]
rw [this, mul_assoc]
congr
rw [← det_permute, det_succ_row_zero]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun j _ => ?_
rw [mul_assoc, Matrix.submatrix_apply, submatrix_submatrix, id_comp, Function.comp_def, id]
congr
· rw [Equiv.Perm.inv_def, Fin.cycleRange_symm_zero]
· ext i' j'
rw [Equiv.Perm.inv_def, Matrix.submatrix_apply, Matrix.submatrix_apply,
Fin.cycleRange_symm_succ]
/-- Laplacian expansion of the determinant of an `n+1 × n+1` matrix along column `j`. -/
theorem det_succ_column {n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin n.succ) (Fin n.succ) R) (j : Fin n.succ) :
det A =
∑ i : Fin n.succ, (-1) ^ (i + j : ℕ) * A i j * det (A.submatrix i.succAbove j.succAbove) := by
rw [← det_transpose, det_succ_row _ j]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [add_comm, ← det_transpose, transpose_apply, transpose_submatrix, transpose_transpose]
/-- Determinant of 0x0 matrix -/
@[simp]
theorem det_fin_zero {A : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 0) R} : det A = 1 :=
det_isEmpty
/-- Determinant of 1x1 matrix -/
theorem det_fin_one (A : Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 1) R) : det A = A 0 0 :=
det_unique A
theorem det_fin_one_of (a : R) : det !![a] = a :=
det_fin_one _
/-- Determinant of 2x2 matrix -/
theorem det_fin_two (A : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) R) : det A = A 0 0 * A 1 1 - A 0 1 * A 1 0 := by
simp only [det_succ_row_zero, det_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, submatrix_apply,
Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.val_zero, Fin.zero_succAbove, univ_unique,
Fin.val_succ, Fin.val_eq_zero, Fin.succ_succAbove_zero, sum_singleton]
ring
@[simp]
theorem det_fin_two_of (a b c d : R) : Matrix.det !![a, b; c, d] = a * d - b * c :=
det_fin_two _
/-- Determinant of 3x3 matrix -/
theorem det_fin_three (A : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) R) :
det A =
A 0 0 * A 1 1 * A 2 2 - A 0 0 * A 1 2 * A 2 1
- A 0 1 * A 1 0 * A 2 2 + A 0 1 * A 1 2 * A 2 0
+ A 0 2 * A 1 0 * A 2 1 - A 0 2 * A 1 1 * A 2 0 := by
simp only [det_succ_row_zero, submatrix_apply, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, submatrix_submatrix,
det_unique, Fin.default_eq_zero, Function.comp_apply, Fin.succ_one_eq_two, Fin.sum_univ_succ,
Fin.val_zero, Fin.zero_succAbove, univ_unique, Fin.val_succ, Fin.val_eq_zero,
Fin.succ_succAbove_zero, sum_singleton, Fin.succ_succAbove_one]
ring
end Matrix
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 832 | 841 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
/-!
# Cardinalities of finite types
This file defines the cardinality `Fintype.card α` as the number of elements in `(univ : Finset α)`.
We also include some elementary results on the values of `Fintype.card` on specific types.
## Main declarations
* `Fintype.card α`: Cardinality of a fintype. Equal to `Finset.univ.card`.
* `Finite.surjective_of_injective`: an injective function from a finite type to
itself is also surjective.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset Function
namespace Fintype
/-- `card α` is the number of elements in `α`, defined when `α` is a fintype. -/
def card (α) [Fintype α] : ℕ :=
(@univ α _).card
theorem subtype_card {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x) :
@card { x // p x } (Fintype.subtype s H) = #s :=
Multiset.card_pmap _ _ _
theorem card_of_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
[Fintype { x // p x }] : card { x // p x } = #s := by
rw [← subtype_card s H]
congr!
@[simp]
theorem card_ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) :
@Fintype.card p (ofFinset s H) = #s :=
Fintype.subtype_card s H
theorem card_of_finset' {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) [Fintype p] :
Fintype.card p = #s := by rw [← card_ofFinset s H]; congr!
end Fintype
namespace Fintype
theorem ofEquiv_card [Fintype α] (f : α ≃ β) : @card β (ofEquiv α f) = card α :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
theorem card_congr {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (f : α ≃ β) : card α = card β := by
rw [← ofEquiv_card f]; congr!
@[congr]
theorem card_congr' {α β} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (h : α = β) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (by rw [h])
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofSubsingleton`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use either `Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton` or
`Fintype.card_unique`. -/
theorem card_ofSubsingleton (a : α) [Subsingleton α] : @Fintype.card _ (ofSubsingleton a) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_unique [Unique α] [h : Fintype α] : Fintype.card α = 1 :=
Subsingleton.elim (ofSubsingleton default) h ▸ card_ofSubsingleton _
/-- Note: this lemma is specifically about `Fintype.ofIsEmpty`. For a statement about
arbitrary `Fintype` instances, use `Fintype.card_eq_zero`. -/
theorem card_ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : @Fintype.card α Fintype.ofIsEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
end Fintype
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α}
-- We use an arbitrary `[Fintype s]` instance here,
-- not necessarily coming from a `[Fintype α]`.
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_card {α : Type*} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinset.card = Fintype.card s :=
Multiset.card_map Subtype.val Finset.univ.val
end Set
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_univ [Fintype α] : #(univ : Finset α) = Fintype.card α := rfl
theorem Finset.eq_univ_of_card [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) (hs : #s = Fintype.card α) :
s = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _) <| by rw [hs, Finset.card_univ]
theorem Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = univ :=
⟨s.eq_univ_of_card, by
rintro rfl
exact Finset.card_univ⟩
theorem Finset.card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
card_le_card (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem [Fintype α] {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hx : x ∉ s) :
#s < Fintype.card α :=
card_lt_card ⟨subset_univ s, not_forall.2 ⟨x, fun hx' => hx (hx' <| mem_univ x)⟩⟩
theorem Finset.card_lt_iff_ne_univ [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s < Fintype.card α ↔ s ≠ Finset.univ :=
s.card_le_univ.lt_iff_ne.trans (not_congr s.card_eq_iff_eq_univ)
theorem Finset.card_compl_lt_iff_nonempty [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ < Fintype.card α ↔ s.Nonempty :=
sᶜ.card_lt_iff_ne_univ.trans s.compl_ne_univ_iff_nonempty
theorem Finset.card_univ_diff [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#(univ \ s) = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_sdiff (subset_univ s)
theorem Finset.card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) : #sᶜ = Fintype.card α - #s :=
Finset.card_univ_diff s
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_add_card_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#s + #sᶜ = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Finset.card_compl, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (card_le_univ s), Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.card_compl_add_card [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (s : Finset α) :
#sᶜ + #s = Fintype.card α := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_add_card_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_compl_set [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype (↥sᶜ : Sort _)] :
Fintype.card (↥sᶜ : Sort _) = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card s := by
classical rw [← Set.toFinset_card, ← Set.toFinset_card, ← Finset.card_compl, Set.toFinset_compl]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq (y : α) [Fintype { x // x = y }] :
Fintype.card { x // x = y } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_eq' (y : α) [Fintype { x // y = x }] :
Fintype.card { x // y = x } = 1 :=
Fintype.card_unique
theorem Fintype.card_empty : Fintype.card Empty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_pempty : Fintype.card PEmpty = 0 :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.card_unit : Fintype.card Unit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_punit : Fintype.card PUnit = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_bool : Fintype.card Bool = 2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_ulift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (ULift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_plift (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (PLift α) = Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.ofEquiv_card _
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_orderDual (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card αᵒᵈ = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_lex (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype.card (Lex α) = Fintype.card α :=
rfl
-- Note: The extra hypothesis `h` is there so that the rewrite lemma applies,
-- no matter what instance of `Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)` is used.
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_setUniv [Fintype α] {h : Fintype (Set.univ : Set α)} :
Fintype.card (Set.univ : Set α) = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_finset'
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_true [Fintype α] {h : Fintype {_a : α // True}} :
@Fintype.card {_a // True} h = Fintype.card α := by
apply Fintype.card_of_subtype
simp
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inl` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `α` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumLeft {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) Sum.inl_injective
/-- Given that `α ⊕ β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. This is non-computable as it uses
that `Sum.inr` is an injection, but there's no clear inverse if `β` is empty. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.sumRight {α β} [Fintype (α ⊕ β)] : Fintype β :=
Fintype.ofInjective (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) Sum.inr_injective
theorem Finite.exists_univ_list (α) [Finite α] : ∃ l : List α, l.Nodup ∧ ∀ x : α, x ∈ l := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
obtain ⟨l, e⟩ := Quotient.exists_rep (@univ α _).1
have := And.intro (@univ α _).2 (@mem_univ_val α _)
exact ⟨_, by rwa [← e] at this⟩
theorem List.Nodup.length_le_card {α : Type*} [Fintype α] {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) :
l.length ≤ Fintype.card α := by
classical exact List.toFinset_card_of_nodup h ▸ l.toFinset.card_le_univ
namespace Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
theorem card_le_of_injective (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) : card α ≤ card β :=
Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn f (fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
theorem card_le_of_embedding (f : α ↪ β) : card α ≤ card β :=
card_le_of_injective f f.2
theorem card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f) {b : β}
(w : b ∉ Set.range f) : card α < card β :=
calc
card α = (univ.map ⟨f, h⟩).card := (card_map _).symm
_ < card β :=
Finset.card_lt_univ_of_not_mem (x := b) <| by
rwa [← mem_coe, coe_map, coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
theorem card_lt_of_injective_not_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Injective f)
(h' : ¬Function.Surjective f) : card α < card β :=
let ⟨_y, hy⟩ := not_forall.1 h'
card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem f h hy
theorem card_le_of_surjective (f : α → β) (h : Function.Surjective f) : card β ≤ card α :=
card_le_of_injective _ (Function.injective_surjInv h)
theorem card_range_le {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) [Fintype α] [Fintype (Set.range f)] :
Fintype.card (Set.range f) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective (fun a => ⟨f a, by simp⟩) fun ⟨_, a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, by simpa using ha⟩
theorem card_range {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [EmbeddingLike F α β] (f : F) [Fintype α]
[Fintype (Set.range f)] : Fintype.card (Set.range f) = Fintype.card α :=
Eq.symm <| Fintype.card_congr <| Equiv.ofInjective _ <| EmbeddingLike.injective f
theorem card_eq_zero_iff : card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α := by
rw [card, Finset.card_eq_zero, univ_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero [IsEmpty α] : card α = 0 :=
card_eq_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
alias card_of_isEmpty := card_eq_zero
/-- A `Fintype` with cardinality zero is equivalent to `Empty`. -/
def cardEqZeroEquivEquivEmpty : card α = 0 ≃ (α ≃ Empty) :=
(Equiv.ofIff card_eq_zero_iff).trans (Equiv.equivEmptyEquiv α).symm
theorem card_pos_iff : 0 < card α ↔ Nonempty α :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_iff_comm.mp <| not_nonempty_iff.trans card_eq_zero_iff.symm
theorem card_pos [h : Nonempty α] : 0 < card α :=
card_pos_iff.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem card_ne_zero [Nonempty α] : card α ≠ 0 :=
_root_.ne_of_gt card_pos
instance [Nonempty α] : NeZero (card α) := ⟨card_ne_zero⟩
theorem existsUnique_iff_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(∃! a : α, p a) ↔ #{x | p x} = 1 := by
rw [Finset.card_eq_one]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
simp only [forall_true_left, Subset.antisymm_iff, subset_singleton_iff', singleton_subset_iff,
true_and, and_comm, mem_univ, mem_filter]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_iff_card_one := existsUnique_iff_card_one
nonrec theorem two_lt_card_iff : 2 < card α ↔ ∃ a b c : α, a ≠ b ∧ a ≠ c ∧ b ≠ c := by
simp_rw [← Finset.card_univ, two_lt_card_iff, mem_univ, true_and]
theorem card_of_bijective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : card α = card β :=
card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Fintype
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem surjective_of_injective {f : α → α} (hinj : Injective f) : Surjective f := by
intro x
have := Classical.propDecidable
cases nonempty_fintype α
have h₁ : image f univ = univ :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ _)
((card_image_of_injective univ hinj).symm ▸ le_rfl)
have h₂ : x ∈ image f univ := h₁.symm ▸ mem_univ x
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_image.1 h₂
exact ⟨y, h.2⟩
theorem injective_iff_surjective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨surjective_of_injective, fun hsurj =>
HasLeftInverse.injective ⟨surjInv hsurj, leftInverse_of_surjective_of_rightInverse
(surjective_of_injective (injective_surjInv _))
(rightInverse_surjInv _)⟩⟩
theorem injective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Injective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem surjective_iff_bijective {f : α → α} : Surjective f ↔ Bijective f := by
simp [Bijective, injective_iff_surjective]
theorem injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv {f : α → β} (e : α ≃ β) : Injective f ↔ Surjective f :=
have : Injective (e.symm ∘ f) ↔ Surjective (e.symm ∘ f) := injective_iff_surjective
⟨fun hinj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.surjective.comp (this.1 (e.symm.injective.comp hinj)),
fun hsurj => by
simpa [Function.comp] using e.injective.comp (this.2 (e.symm.surjective.comp hsurj))⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := injective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Surjective.bijective_of_finite, _⟩ := surjective_iff_bijective
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Injective.surjective_of_fintype,
_root_.Function.Surjective.injective_of_fintype⟩ :=
injective_iff_surjective_of_equiv
end Finite
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_coe (s : Finset α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = #s :=
@Fintype.card_of_finset' _ _ _ (fun _ => Iff.rfl) (id _)
/-- We can inflate a set `s` to any bigger size. -/
lemma Finset.exists_superset_card_eq [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} (hsn : #s ≤ n)
(hnα : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
∃ t, s ⊆ t ∧ #t = n := by simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.subset_univ hsn hnα
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_prop : Fintype.card Prop = 2 :=
rfl
theorem set_fintype_card_le_univ [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype s)
theorem set_fintype_card_eq_univ_iff [Fintype α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
Fintype.card s = Fintype.card α ↔ s = Set.univ := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Finset.card_eq_iff_eq_univ, ← Set.toFinset_univ, Set.toFinset_inj]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_le [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Function.Embedding.subtype _)
lemma Fintype.card_subtype_lt [Fintype α] {p : α → Prop} [Fintype {a // p a}] {x : α} (hx : ¬p x) :
Fintype.card { x // p x } < Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_lt_of_injective_of_not_mem (b := x) (↑) Subtype.coe_injective <| by
rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype {a // p a}] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype.card { x // p x } = #{x | p x} := by
refine Fintype.card_of_subtype _ ?_
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_compl [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card α - Fintype.card { x // p x } := by
classical
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype (Set.toFinset { x | p x }ᶜ), Set.toFinset_compl,
Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_of_subtype] <;>
· intro
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf]
theorem Fintype.card_subtype_mono (p q : α → Prop) (h : p ≤ q) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // q x }] : Fintype.card { x // p x } ≤ Fintype.card { x // q x } :=
Fintype.card_le_of_embedding (Subtype.impEmbedding _ _ h)
/-- If two subtypes of a fintype have equal cardinality, so do their complements. -/
theorem Fintype.card_compl_eq_card_compl [Finite α] (p q : α → Prop) [Fintype { x // p x }]
[Fintype { x // ¬p x }] [Fintype { x // q x }] [Fintype { x // ¬q x }]
(h : Fintype.card { x // p x } = Fintype.card { x // q x }) :
Fintype.card { x // ¬p x } = Fintype.card { x // ¬q x } := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
simp only [Fintype.card_subtype_compl, h]
theorem Fintype.card_quotient_le [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α)
[DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] : Fintype.card (Quotient s) ≤ Fintype.card α :=
Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ Quotient.mk'_surjective
theorem univ_eq_singleton_of_card_one {α} [Fintype α] (x : α) (h : Fintype.card α = 1) :
(univ : Finset α) = {x} := by
symm
apply eq_of_subset_of_card_le (subset_univ {x})
apply le_of_eq
simp [h, Finset.card_univ]
namespace Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] [IsIrrefl α r] :
WellFounded r := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype α
have (x y) (hxy : r x y) : #{z | r z x} < #{z | r z y} :=
Finset.card_lt_card <| by
simp only [Finset.lt_iff_ssubset.symm, lt_iff_le_not_le, Finset.le_iff_subset,
Finset.subset_iff, mem_filter, true_and, mem_univ, hxy]
exact
⟨fun z hzx => _root_.trans hzx hxy,
not_forall_of_exists_not ⟨x, Classical.not_imp.2 ⟨hxy, irrefl x⟩⟩⟩
exact Subrelation.wf (this _ _) (measure _).wf
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedLT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedLT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_wellFoundedGT [Preorder α] : WellFoundedGT α :=
⟨wellFounded_of_trans_of_irrefl _⟩
end Finite
-- Shortcut instances to make sure those are found even in the presence of other instances
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/WellFoundedLT.20Prop.20is.20not.20found.20when.20importing.20too.20much
instance Bool.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Bool := inferInstance
instance Bool.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Bool := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Prop := inferInstance
instance Prop.instWellFoundedGT : WellFoundedGT Prop := inferInstance
section Trunc
/-- A `Fintype` with positive cardinality constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfCardPos {α} [Fintype α] (h : 0 < Fintype.card α) : Trunc α :=
letI := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp h
truncOfNonemptyFintype α
end Trunc
/-- A custom induction principle for fintypes. The base case is a subsingleton type,
and the induction step is for non-trivial types, and one can assume the hypothesis for
smaller types (via `Fintype.card`).
The major premise is `Fintype α`, so to use this with the `induction` tactic you have to give a name
to that instance and use that name.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Fintype.induction_subsingleton_or_nontrivial {P : ∀ (α) [Fintype α], Prop} (α : Type*)
[Fintype α] (hbase : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Subsingleton α], P α)
(hstep : ∀ (α) [Fintype α] [Nontrivial α],
(∀ (β) [Fintype β], Fintype.card β < Fintype.card α → P β) → P α) :
P α := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, Fintype.card α = n := ⟨Fintype.card α, rfl⟩
| induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n ih generalizing α
rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α with hsing | hnontriv
· apply hbase
· apply hstep
intro β _ hlt
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Card.lean | 467 | 471 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,350 | 1,359 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.ofReal_pos_of_pos⟩ := ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < r := by
rw [← zero_lt_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ofNat(n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = ofNat(n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
theorem ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
theorem ofReal_lt_coe_iff {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < b :=
(ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal ha coe_ne_top).trans <| by rw [coe_toReal]
theorem le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hb
theorem toReal_le_of_le_ofReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b) :
ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top ofReal_ne_top h
(le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha hb).1 h
theorem lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
theorem toReal_lt_of_lt_ofReal {b : ℝ} (h : a < ENNReal.ofReal b) : ENNReal.toReal a < b :=
(lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt h.ne_top).1 h
theorem ofReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_mul, Real.toNNReal_mul hp]
theorem ofReal_mul' {p q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [mul_comm, ofReal_mul hq, mul_comm]
theorem ofReal_pow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (n : ℕ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p ^ n) = ENNReal.ofReal p ^ n := by
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hp, ← coe_pow, ← ofReal_coe_nnreal, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ofReal_nsmul {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal (n • x) = n • ENNReal.ofReal x := by
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_natCast n, ← ofReal_mul n.cast_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : (a * b).toNNReal = a.toNNReal * b.toNNReal :=
WithTop.untopD_zero_mul a b
theorem toNNReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by simp
theorem toNNReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by simp
/-- `ENNReal.toNNReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toNNRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := ENNReal.toNNReal
map_one' := toNNReal_coe _
map_mul' _ _ := toNNReal_mul
map_zero' := toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toNNReal = a.toNNReal ^ n :=
toNNRealHom.map_pow a n
/-- `ENNReal.toReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ :=
(NNReal.toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ).comp toNNRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toReal_mul : (a * b).toReal = a.toReal * b.toReal :=
toRealHom.map_mul a b
theorem toReal_nsmul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (n • a).toReal = n • a.toReal := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toReal = a.toReal ^ n :=
toRealHom.map_pow a n
theorem toReal_ofReal_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ENNReal.toReal (ENNReal.ofReal c * a) = c * ENNReal.toReal a := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h]
theorem toReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by
rw [toReal_mul, toReal_top, mul_zero]
theorem toReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact toReal_mul_top _
theorem toReal_eq_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal = b.toReal ↔ a = b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simp only [coe_inj, NNReal.coe_inj, coe_toReal]
protected theorem trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal := by
simpa only [or_iff_not_imp_left] using toReal_pos
protected theorem trichotomy₂ {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 ∨
p = 0 ∧ q = ∞ ∨
p = 0 ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∨
p = ∞ ∧ q = ∞ ∨
0 < p.toReal ∧ q = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∧ p.toReal ≤ q.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (bot_le : 0 ≤ p) with ((rfl : 0 = p) | (hp : 0 < p))
· simpa using q.trichotomy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_top : q ≤ ∞) with (rfl | hq)
· simpa using p.trichotomy
repeat' right
have hq' : 0 < q := lt_of_lt_of_le hp hpq
have hp' : p < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt hpq hq
simp [ENNReal.toReal_mono hq.ne hpq, ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff, hp, hp', hq', hq]
protected theorem dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal :=
haveI : p = ⊤ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
simpa using ENNReal.trichotomy₂ (Fact.out : 1 ≤ p)
this.imp_right fun h => h.2
theorem toReal_pos_iff_ne_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : 0 < p.toReal ↔ p ≠ ∞ :=
⟨fun h hp =>
have : (0 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := toReal_top ▸ (hp ▸ h.ne : 0 ≠ ∞.toReal)
this rfl,
fun h => zero_lt_one.trans_le (p.dichotomy.resolve_left h)⟩
end Real
section iInf
variable {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
| theorem toNNReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toNNReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, toNNReal_top, NNReal.iInf_empty]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 377 | 379 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
/-!
# The derivative of a composition (chain rule)
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
composition of functions (the chain rule).
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f g : E → F} {f' g' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} {s : Set E} {L : Filter E}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of two functions
For composition lemmas, we put `x` explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition. -/
variable (x)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {L' : Filter F}
(hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' (f x) L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : Tendsto f L L') :
HasFDerivAtFilter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L := by
let eq₁ := (g'.isBigO_comp _ _).trans_isLittleO hf.isLittleO
let eq₂ := (hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto hL).trans_isBigO hf.isBigO_sub
refine .of_isLittleO <| eq₂.triangle <| eq₁.congr_left fun x' => ?_
simp
/- A readable version of the previous theorem, a general form of the chain rule. -/
example {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' (f x) (L.map f))
(hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) : HasFDerivAtFilter (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x L := by
have :=
calc
(fun x' => g (f x') - g (f x) - g' (f x' - f x)) =o[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto le_rfl
_ =O[L] fun x' => x' - x := hf.isBigO_sub
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.triangle ?_
calc
(fun x' : E => g' (f x' - f x) - g'.comp f' (x' - x))
_ =ᶠ[L] fun x' => g' (f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) := Eventually.of_forall fun x' => by simp
_ =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x) := g'.isBigO_comp _ _
_ =o[L] fun x' => x' - x := hf.isLittleO
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : Set F}
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf <| hf.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : HasFDerivAt g g' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
hg.comp x hf hf.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.comp_of_tendsto {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} {t : Set F}
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hst : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x)) : HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf hst
/-- The chain rule. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G} (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' (f x))
(hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (g ∘ f) (g'.comp f') x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.comp x hg hf hf.continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h : MapsTo f s t) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.comp' {g : F → G} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.comp {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.differentiableWithinAt.comp x hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem fderivWithin_comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderivWithin.comp := fderivWithin_comp
theorem fderivWithin_comp_of_eq {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {y : F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
subst hy; exact fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp' {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) s x
= (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp_of_eq' {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {y : F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) s x
= (fderivWithin 𝕜 g t (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
subst hy; exact fderivWithin_comp _ hg hf h hxs
/-- A version of `fderivWithin_comp` that is useful to rewrite the composition of two derivatives
into a single derivative. This version always applies, but creates a new side-goal `f x = y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_fderivWithin {g : F → G} {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} {s : Set E} {t : Set F}
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hy : f x = y) (v : E) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 g t y (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x v) = fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x v := by
subst y
rw [fderivWithin_comp x hg hf h hxs, coe_comp', Function.comp_apply]
/-- Ternary version of `fderivWithin_comp`, with equality assumptions of basepoints added, in
order to apply more easily as a rewrite from right-to-left. -/
theorem fderivWithin_comp₃ {g' : G → G'} {g : F → G} {t : Set F} {u : Set G} {y : F} {y' : G}
(hg' : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g' u y') (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g t y)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (h2g : MapsTo g t u) (h2f : MapsTo f s t) (h3g : g y = y')
(h3f : f x = y) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g' ∘ g ∘ f) s x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 g' u y').comp ((fderivWithin 𝕜 g t y).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)) := by
substs h3g h3f
exact (hg'.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x (hg.hasFDerivWithinAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt h2f) <|
h2g.comp h2f).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderivWithin.comp₃ := fderivWithin_comp₃
theorem fderiv_comp {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (g ∘ f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp x hf.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderiv.comp := fderiv_comp
/-- A variant for the derivative of a composition, written without `∘`. -/
theorem fderiv_comp' {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x)) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y ↦ g (f y)) x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
fderiv_comp x hg hf
theorem fderiv_comp_fderivWithin {g : F → G} (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g (f x))
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s x = (fderiv 𝕜 g (f x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(hg.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias fderiv.comp_fderivWithin := fderiv_comp_fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.comp {g : F → G} {t : Set F} (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g t)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (st : MapsTo f s t) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => DifferentiableWithinAt.comp x (hg (f x) (st hx)) (hf x hx) st
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.comp {g : F → G} (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (g ∘ f) :=
fun x => DifferentiableAt.comp x (hg (f x)) (hf x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.comp_differentiableOn {g : F → G} (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g)
(hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.differentiableOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
/-- The chain rule for derivatives in the sense of strict differentiability. -/
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.comp {g : F → G} {g' : F →L[𝕜] G}
(hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' (f x)) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => g (f x)) (g'.comp f') x :=
.of_isLittleO <|
((hg.isLittleO.comp_tendsto (hf.continuousAt.prodMap' hf.continuousAt)).trans_isBigO
hf.isBigO_sub).triangle <| by
simpa only [g'.map_sub, f'.coe_comp'] using (g'.isBigO_comp _ _).trans_isLittleO hf.isLittleO
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem Differentiable.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (n : ℕ) :
Differentiable 𝕜 f^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n differentiable_id fun _ ihn => ihn.comp hf
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem DifferentiableOn.iterate {f : E → E} (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s)
(hs : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f^[n] s :=
Nat.recOn n differentiableOn_id fun _ ihn => ihn.comp hf hs
variable {x}
protected theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : Tendsto f L L) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f^[n] (f' ^ n) x L := by
induction n with
| zero => exact hasFDerivAtFilter_id x L
| succ n ihn =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ, pow_succ]
rw [← hx] at ihn
exact ihn.comp x hf hL
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasFDerivAt.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E} (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x)
(hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) : HasFDerivAt f^[n] (f' ^ n) x := by
refine HasFDerivAtFilter.iterate hf ?_ hx n
convert hf.continuousAt.tendsto
exact hx.symm
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hx : f x = x) (hs : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f^[n] (f' ^ n) s x := by
refine HasFDerivAtFilter.iterate hf ?_ hx n
rw [nhdsWithin]
convert tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hf.continuousWithinAt, _⟩
exacts [hx.symm, (tendsto_principal_principal.2 hs).mono_left inf_le_right]
|
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.iterate {f : E → E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f^[n] (f' ^ n) x := by
induction n with
| zero => exact hasStrictFDerivAt_id x
| succ n ihn =>
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Comp.lean | 243 | 250 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,623 | 2,629 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
-- TODO: remove Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced and move the last two lemmas to Lemmas
/-!
# Roots of unity
We define roots of unity in the context of an arbitrary commutative monoid,
as a subgroup of the group of units.
## Main definitions
* `rootsOfUnity n M`, for `n : ℕ` is the subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid `M`
consisting of elements `x` that satisfy `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main results
* `rootsOfUnity.isCyclic`: the roots of unity in an integral domain form a cyclic group.
## Implementation details
It is desirable that `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup,
and it will mainly be applied to rings (e.g. the ring of integers in a number field) and fields.
We therefore implement it as a subgroup of the units of a commutative monoid.
We have chosen to define `rootsOfUnity n` for `n : ℕ` and add a `[NeZero n]` typeclass
assumption when we need `n` to be non-zero (which is the case for most interesting statements).
Note that `rootsOfUnity 0 M` is the top subgroup of `Mˣ` (as the condition `ζ^0 = 1` is
satisfied for all units).
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
variable {M N G R S F : Type*}
variable [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N] [DivisionCommMonoid G]
section rootsOfUnity
variable {k l : ℕ}
/-- `rootsOfUnity k M` is the subgroup of elements `m : Mˣ` that satisfy `m ^ k = 1`. -/
def rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : Subgroup Mˣ where
carrier := {ζ | ζ ^ k = 1}
one_mem' := one_pow _
mul_mem' _ _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, mul_pow, one_mul]
inv_mem' _ := by simp_all only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, inv_pow, inv_one]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ ζ ^ k = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity` using `ζ : Mˣ`. -/
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity' (k : ℕ) (ζ : Mˣ) : ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k M ↔ (ζ : M) ^ k = 1 := by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity]; norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity_one (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 1 M = ⊥ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_one, Subgroup.mem_bot]
@[simp]
lemma rootsOfUnity_zero (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] : rootsOfUnity 0 M = ⊤ := by
ext1
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_zero, Subgroup.mem_top]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_injective {n : ℕ} :
Function.Injective (fun x : rootsOfUnity n M ↦ x.val.val) :=
Units.ext.comp fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.eq
/-- Make an element of `rootsOfUnity` from a member of the base ring, and a proof that it has
a positive power equal to one. -/
@[simps! coe_val]
def rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq (ζ : M) {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) : rootsOfUnity n M :=
⟨Units.ofPowEqOne ζ n h <| NeZero.ne n, Units.pow_ofPowEqOne _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_mkOfPowEq {ζ : M} {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : ζ ^ n = 1) :
((rootsOfUnity.mkOfPowEq _ h : Mˣ) : M) = ζ :=
rfl
theorem rootsOfUnity_le_of_dvd (h : k ∣ l) : rootsOfUnity k M ≤ rootsOfUnity l M := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := h
intro ζ h
simp_all only [mem_rootsOfUnity, pow_mul, one_pow]
theorem map_rootsOfUnity (f : Mˣ →* Nˣ) (k : ℕ) : (rootsOfUnity k M).map f ≤ rootsOfUnity k N := by
rintro _ ⟨ζ, h, rfl⟩
simp_all only [← map_pow, mem_rootsOfUnity, SetLike.mem_coe, MonoidHom.map_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem rootsOfUnity.coe_pow [CommMonoid R] (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) (m : ℕ) :
(((ζ ^ m :) : Rˣ) : R) = ((ζ : Rˣ) : R) ^ m := by
rw [Subgroup.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
/-- The canonical isomorphism from the `n`th roots of unity in `Mˣ`
to the `n`th roots of unity in `M`. -/
def rootsOfUnityUnitsMulEquiv (M : Type*) [CommMonoid M] (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n Mˣ ≃* rootsOfUnity n M where
toFun ζ := ⟨ζ.val, (mem_rootsOfUnity ..).mpr <| (mem_rootsOfUnity' ..).mp ζ.prop⟩
invFun ζ := ⟨toUnits ζ.val, by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, ← map_pow, EmbeddingLike.map_eq_one_iff]
exact (mem_rootsOfUnity ..).mp ζ.prop⟩
left_inv ζ := by simp only [toUnits_val_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv ζ := by simp only [val_toUnits_apply, Subtype.coe_eta]
map_mul' ζ ζ' := by simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk]
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid R] [CommMonoid S] [FunLike F R S]
/-- Restrict a ring homomorphism to the nth roots of unity. -/
def restrictRootsOfUnity [MonoidHomClass F R S] (σ : F) (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n R →* rootsOfUnity n S :=
{ toFun := fun ξ ↦ ⟨Units.map σ (ξ : Rˣ), by
rw [mem_rootsOfUnity, ← map_pow, Units.ext_iff, Units.coe_map, ξ.prop]
exact map_one σ⟩
map_one' := by ext1; simp only [OneMemClass.coe_one, map_one]
map_mul' := fun ξ₁ ξ₂ ↦ by
ext1; simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul, map_mul, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk] }
@[simp]
theorem restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply [MonoidHomClass F R S] (σ : F) (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(restrictRootsOfUnity σ k ζ : Sˣ) = σ (ζ : Rˣ) :=
rfl
/-- Restrict a monoid isomorphism to the nth roots of unity. -/
nonrec def MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity (σ : R ≃* S) (n : ℕ) :
rootsOfUnity n R ≃* rootsOfUnity n S where
toFun := restrictRootsOfUnity σ n
invFun := restrictRootsOfUnity σ.symm n
left_inv ξ := by ext; exact σ.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv ξ := by ext; exact σ.apply_symm_apply _
map_mul' := (restrictRootsOfUnity _ n).map_mul
@[simp]
theorem MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply (σ : R ≃* S) (ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(σ.restrictRootsOfUnity k ζ : Sˣ) = σ (ζ : Rˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem MulEquiv.restrictRootsOfUnity_symm (σ : R ≃* S) :
(σ.restrictRootsOfUnity k).symm = σ.symm.restrictRootsOfUnity k :=
rfl
end CommMonoid
section IsDomain
-- The following results need `k` to be nonzero.
variable [NeZero k] [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_iff_mem_nthRoots {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity k R ↔ (ζ : R) ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) := by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, mem_nthRoots (NeZero.pos k), Units.ext_iff, Units.val_one,
Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val]
variable (k R)
/-- Equivalence between the `k`-th roots of unity in `R` and the `k`-th roots of `1`.
This is implemented as equivalence of subtypes,
because `rootsOfUnity` is a subgroup of the group of units,
whereas `nthRoots` is a multiset. -/
def rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots : rootsOfUnity k R ≃ { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } where
toFun x := ⟨(x : Rˣ), mem_rootsOfUnity_iff_mem_nthRoots.mp x.2⟩
invFun x := by
refine ⟨⟨x, ↑x ^ (k - 1 : ℕ), ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
all_goals
rcases x with ⟨x, hx⟩; rw [mem_nthRoots <| NeZero.pos k] at hx
simp only [← pow_succ, ← pow_succ', hx, tsub_add_cancel_of_le NeZero.one_le]
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, hx, Units.val_one]
left_inv := by rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; ext; rfl
right_inv := by rintro ⟨x, hx⟩; ext; rfl
variable {k R}
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots_apply (x : rootsOfUnity k R) :
(rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k x : R) = ((x : Rˣ) : R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots_symm_apply (x : { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) }) :
(((rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k).symm x : Rˣ) : R) = (x : R) :=
rfl
variable (k R)
instance rootsOfUnity.fintype : Fintype (rootsOfUnity k R) := by
classical
exact Fintype.ofEquiv { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } (rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k).symm
instance rootsOfUnity.isCyclic : IsCyclic (rootsOfUnity k R) :=
isCyclic_of_subgroup_isDomain ((Units.coeHom R).comp (rootsOfUnity k R).subtype) coe_injective
theorem card_rootsOfUnity : Fintype.card (rootsOfUnity k R) ≤ k := by
classical
calc
Fintype.card (rootsOfUnity k R) = Fintype.card { x // x ∈ nthRoots k (1 : R) } :=
Fintype.card_congr (rootsOfUnityEquivNthRoots R k)
_ ≤ Multiset.card (nthRoots k (1 : R)).attach := Multiset.card_le_card (Multiset.dedup_le _)
_ = Multiset.card (nthRoots k (1 : R)) := Multiset.card_attach
_ ≤ k := card_nthRoots k 1
variable {k R}
theorem map_rootsOfUnity_eq_pow_self [FunLike F R R] [MonoidHomClass F R R] (σ : F)
(ζ : rootsOfUnity k R) :
∃ m : ℕ, σ (ζ : Rˣ) = ((ζ : Rˣ) : R) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := MonoidHom.map_cyclic (restrictRootsOfUnity σ k)
rw [← restrictRootsOfUnity_coe_apply, hm, ← zpow_mod_orderOf, ← Int.toNat_of_nonneg
(m.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (pos_iff_ne_zero.mp (orderOf_pos ζ)))),
zpow_natCast, rootsOfUnity.coe_pow]
exact ⟨(m % orderOf ζ).toNat, rfl⟩
end IsDomain
section Reduced
variable (R) [CommRing R] [IsReduced R]
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff'`
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff (p k : ℕ) (m : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity (p ^ k * m) R ↔ ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity m R := by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity', ExpChar.pow_prime_pow_mul_eq_one_iff]
/-- A variant of `mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff` in terms of `ζ ^ _` -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff' (p k : ℕ) (m : ℕ) [ExpChar R p] {ζ : Rˣ} :
ζ ^ (p ^ k * m) = 1 ↔ ζ ∈ rootsOfUnity m R := by
rw [← mem_rootsOfUnity, mem_rootsOfUnity_prime_pow_mul_iff]
end Reduced
end rootsOfUnity
section cyclic
namespace IsCyclic
/-- The isomorphism from the group of group homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group `G` of order
`n` into another group `G'` to the group of `n`th roots of unity in `G'` determined by a generator
`g` of `G`. It sends `φ : G →* G'` to `φ g`. -/
noncomputable
def monoidHomMulEquivRootsOfUnityOfGenerator {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] {g : G}
(hg : ∀ (x : G), x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers g) (G' : Type*) [CommGroup G'] :
(G →* G') ≃* rootsOfUnity (Nat.card G) G' where
toFun φ := ⟨(IsUnit.map φ <| Group.isUnit g).unit, by
simp only [mem_rootsOfUnity, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, IsUnit.unit_spec,
← map_pow, pow_card_eq_one', map_one, Units.val_one]⟩
invFun ζ := monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers hg (g' := (ζ.val : G')) <| by
simpa only [orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hg, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one,
← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_eq_one] using ζ.prop
left_inv φ := (MonoidHom.eq_iff_eq_on_generator hg _ φ).mpr <| by
simp only [IsUnit.unit_spec, monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers_apply_gen]
right_inv φ := Subtype.ext <| by
simp only [monoidHomOfForallMemZpowers_apply_gen, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
map_mul' x y := by
simp only [MonoidHom.mul_apply, MulMemClass.mk_mul_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq, Units.ext_iff,
IsUnit.unit_spec, Units.val_mul]
/-- The group of group homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group `G` of order `n` into another
group `G'` is (noncanonically) isomorphic to the group of `n`th roots of unity in `G'`. -/
lemma monoidHom_mulEquiv_rootsOfUnity (G : Type*) [CommGroup G] [IsCyclic G]
(G' : Type*) [CommGroup G'] :
Nonempty <| (G →* G') ≃* rootsOfUnity (Nat.card G) G' := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
exact ⟨monoidHomMulEquivRootsOfUnityOfGenerator hg G'⟩
end IsCyclic
end cyclic
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Basic.lean | 958 | 976 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.Basic
/-!
# Free abelian groups
The free abelian group on a type `α`, defined as the abelianisation of
the free group on `α`.
The free abelian group on `α` can be abstractly defined as the left adjoint of the
forgetful functor from abelian groups to types. Alternatively, one could define
it as the functions `α → ℤ` which send all but finitely many `(a : α)` to `0`,
under pointwise addition. In this file, it is defined as the abelianisation
of the free group on `α`. All the constructions and theorems required to show
the adjointness of the construction and the forgetful functor are proved in this
file, but the category-theoretic adjunction statement is in
`Algebra.Category.Group.Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
Here we use the following variables: `(α β : Type*) (A : Type*) [AddCommGroup A]`
* `FreeAbelianGroup α` : the free abelian group on a type `α`. As an abelian
group it is `α →₀ ℤ`, the functions from `α` to `ℤ` such that all but finitely
many elements get mapped to zero, however this is not how it is implemented.
* `lift f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ A` : the group homomorphism induced
by the map `f : α → A`.
* `map (f : α → β) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` : functoriality
of `FreeAbelianGroup`.
* `instance [Monoid α] : Semigroup (FreeAbelianGroup α)`
* `instance [CommMonoid α] : CommRing (FreeAbelianGroup α)`
It has been suggested that we would be better off refactoring this file
and using `Finsupp` instead.
## Implementation issues
The definition is `def FreeAbelianGroup : Type u := Additive <| Abelianization <| FreeGroup α`.
Chris Hughes has suggested that this all be rewritten in terms of `Finsupp`.
Johan Commelin has written all the API relating the definition to `Finsupp`
in the lean-liquid repo.
The lemmas `map_pure`, `map_of`, `map_zero`, `map_add`, `map_neg` and `map_sub`
are proved about the `Functor.map` `<$>` construction, and need `α` and `β` to
be in the same universe. But
`FreeAbelianGroup.map (f : α → β)` is defined to be the `AddGroup`
homomorphism `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` (with `α` and `β` now
allowed to be in different universes), so `(map f).map_add`
etc can be used to prove that `FreeAbelianGroup.map` preserves addition. The
functions `map_id`, `map_id_apply`, `map_comp`, `map_comp_apply` and `map_of_apply`
are about `FreeAbelianGroup.map`.
-/
universe u v
variable (α : Type u)
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is the free abelian group generated by `α`.
This is an abelian group equipped with a function
`FreeAbelianGroup.of : α → FreeAbelianGroup α` which has the following universal property:
if `G` is any abelian group, and `f : α → G` is any function, then this function is
the composite of `FreeAbelianGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeAbelianGroup.lift f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ G`.
A typical element of `FreeAbelianGroup α` is a formal sum of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x + x + x - y` is a
"typical" element of `FreeAbelianGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is isomorphic to `ℤ`.
One can think of `FreeAbelianGroup α` as the functions `α →₀ ℤ` with finite support,
and addition given pointwise.
TODO: rename to `FreeAddCommGroup` and introduce a multiplicative version
-/
def FreeAbelianGroup : Type u :=
Additive <| Abelianization <| FreeGroup α
-- FIXME: this is super broken, because the functions have type `Additive .. → ..`
-- instead of `FreeAbelianGroup α → ..` and those are not defeq!
instance FreeAbelianGroup.addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
@Additive.addCommGroup _ <| Abelianization.commGroup _
instance : Inhabited (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (FreeAbelianGroup α) := by unfold FreeAbelianGroup; infer_instance
variable {α}
namespace FreeAbelianGroup
/-- The canonical map from `α` to `FreeAbelianGroup α`. -/
def of (x : α) : FreeAbelianGroup α :=
Additive.ofMul <| Abelianization.of <| FreeGroup.of x
/-- The map `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ A` induced by a map of types `α → A`. -/
def lift {β : Type v} [AddCommGroup β] : (α → β) ≃ (FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) :=
(@FreeGroup.lift _ (Multiplicative β) _).trans <|
(@Abelianization.lift _ _ (Multiplicative β) _).trans MonoidHom.toAdditive
namespace lift
variable {β : Type v} [AddCommGroup β] (f : α → β)
open FreeAbelianGroup
-- Porting note: needed to add `(β := Multiplicative β)` and `using 1`.
@[simp]
protected theorem of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x := by
convert Abelianization.lift.of
(FreeGroup.lift f (β := Multiplicative β)) (FreeGroup.of x) using 1
exact (FreeGroup.lift.of (β := Multiplicative β)).symm
protected theorem unique (g : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) (hg : ∀ x, g (of x) = f x) {x} :
g x = lift f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_eq.mp (funext hg : g ∘ of = f)) _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
protected theorem ext (g h : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) (H : ∀ x, g (of x) = h (of x)) : g = h :=
lift.symm.injective <| funext H
theorem map_hom {α β γ} [AddCommGroup β] [AddCommGroup γ] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) (f : α → β)
(g : β →+ γ) : g (lift f a) = lift (g ∘ f) a := by
show (g.comp (lift f)) a = lift (g ∘ f) a
apply lift.unique
intro a
show g ((lift f) (of a)) = g (f a)
simp only [(· ∘ ·), lift.of]
end lift
section
open scoped Classical in
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (of : α → FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
fun x y hoxy ↦ Classical.by_contradiction fun hxy : x ≠ y ↦
let f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ ℤ := lift fun z ↦ if x = z then (1 : ℤ) else 0
have hfx1 : f (of x) = 1 := (lift.of _ _).trans <| if_pos rfl
have hfy1 : f (of y) = 1 := hoxy ▸ hfx1
have hfy0 : f (of y) = 0 := (lift.of _ _).trans <| if_neg hxy
one_ne_zero <| hfy1.symm.trans hfy0
@[simp]
theorem of_ne_zero (x : α) : of x ≠ 0 := by
intro h
let f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ ℤ := lift 1
have hfx : f (of x) = 1 := lift.of _ _
have hf0 : f (of x) = 0 := by rw [h, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero <| hfx.symm.trans hf0
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_of (x : α) : 0 ≠ of x := of_ne_zero _ |>.symm
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (FreeAbelianGroup α) where
exists_pair_ne := let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›; ⟨0, of x, zero_ne_of _⟩
end
attribute [local instance] QuotientGroup.leftRel
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {C : FreeAbelianGroup α → Prop} (z : FreeAbelianGroup α) (C0 : C 0)
(C1 : ∀ x, C <| of x) (Cn : ∀ x, C (of x) → C (-of x)) (Cp : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) :
C z :=
Quotient.inductionOn' z fun x ↦
Quot.inductionOn x fun L ↦
List.recOn L C0 fun ⟨x, b⟩ _ ih ↦ Bool.recOn b (Cp _ _ (Cn _ (C1 x)) ih) (Cp _ _ (C1 x) ih)
theorem lift.add' {α β} [AddCommGroup β] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) (f g : α → β) :
lift (f + g) a = lift f a + lift g a := by
refine FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on a ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [(lift _).map_zero, zero_add]
· intro x
simp only [lift.of, Pi.add_apply]
· intro x _
simp only [map_neg, lift.of, Pi.add_apply, neg_add]
· intro x y hx hy
simp only [(lift _).map_add, hx, hy, add_add_add_comm]
/-- If `g : FreeAbelianGroup X` and `A` is an abelian group then `liftAddGroupHom g`
is the additive group homomorphism sending a function `X → A` to the term of type `A`
corresponding to the evaluation of the induced map `FreeAbelianGroup X → A` at `g`. -/
@[simps!]
def liftAddGroupHom {α} (β) [AddCommGroup β] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) : (α → β) →+ β :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f ↦ lift f a) (lift.add' a)
theorem lift_neg' {β} [AddCommGroup β] (f : α → β) : lift (-f) = -lift f :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ ↦ (liftAddGroupHom _ _ : (α → β) →+ β).map_neg _
section Monad
variable {β : Type u}
instance : Monad FreeAbelianGroup.{u} where
pure α := of α
bind x f := lift f x
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {C : FreeAbelianGroup α → Prop} (z : FreeAbelianGroup α) (C0 : C 0)
(C1 : ∀ x, C <| pure x) (Cn : ∀ x, C (pure x) → C (-pure x))
(Cp : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C z :=
FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on z C0 C1 Cn Cp
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (x : α) : f <$> (pure x : FreeAbelianGroup α) = pure (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : f <$> (0 : FreeAbelianGroup α) = 0 :=
(lift (of ∘ f)).map_zero
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add (f : α → β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <$> (x + y) = f <$> x + f <$> y :=
(lift _).map_add _ _
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : α → β) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : f <$> (-x) = -f <$> x :=
map_neg (lift <| of ∘ f) _
@[simp]
protected theorem map_sub (f : α → β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <$> (x - y) = f <$> x - f <$> y :=
map_sub (lift <| of ∘ f) _ _
@[simp]
theorem map_of (f : α → β) (y : α) : f <$> of y = of (f y) :=
rfl
theorem pure_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x) : pure x >>= f = f x :=
lift.of _ _
@[simp]
theorem zero_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) : 0 >>= f = 0 :=
(lift f).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem add_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
x + y >>= f = (x >>= f) + (y >>= f) :=
(lift _).map_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem neg_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : -x >>= f = -(x >>= f) :=
map_neg (lift f) _
@[simp]
theorem sub_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
x - y >>= f = (x >>= f) - (y >>= f) :=
map_sub (lift f) _ _
@[simp]
theorem pure_seq (f : α → β) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : pure f <*> x = f <$> x :=
pure_bind _ _
@[simp]
theorem zero_seq (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : (0 : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) <*> x = 0 :=
zero_bind _
@[simp]
theorem add_seq (f g : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f + g <*> x = (f <*> x) + (g <*> x) :=
add_bind _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem neg_seq (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : -f <*> x = -(f <*> x) :=
neg_bind _ _
@[simp]
theorem sub_seq (f g : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f - g <*> x = (f <*> x) - (g <*> x) :=
sub_bind _ _ _
/-- If `f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)`, then `f <*>` is an additive morphism
`FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β`. -/
def seqAddGroupHom (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (f <*> ·) fun x y ↦
show lift (· <$> (x + y)) _ = _ by
simp only [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add]
exact lift.add' f _ _
@[simp]
theorem seq_zero (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) : f <*> 0 = 0 :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem seq_add (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <*> x + y = (f <*> x) + (f <*> y) :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_add x y
@[simp]
theorem seq_neg (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : f <*> -x = -(f <*> x) :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_neg x
@[simp]
theorem seq_sub (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <*> x - y = (f <*> x) - (f <*> y) :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_sub x y
instance : LawfulMonad FreeAbelianGroup.{u} := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x ↦ FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' x (FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero id) (map_pure id)
(fun x ih ↦ by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, ih])
fun x y ihx ihy ↦ by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, ihx, ihy])
(pure_bind := fun x f ↦ pure_bind f x)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g ↦ FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' x (by iterate 3 rw [zero_bind])
(fun x ↦ by iterate 2 rw [pure_bind]) (fun x ih ↦ by iterate 3 rw [neg_bind] <;> try rw [ih])
fun x y ihx ihy ↦ by iterate 3 rw [add_bind] <;> try rw [ihx, ihy])
instance : CommApplicative FreeAbelianGroup.{u} where
commutative_prod x y := by
refine FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' x ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero, zero_seq, seq_zero]
· intro p
rw [map_pure, pure_seq]
exact FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' y
(by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero, FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero, zero_seq])
(fun q ↦ by rw [map_pure, map_pure, pure_seq, map_pure])
(fun q ih ↦ by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, neg_seq, ih])
fun y₁ y₂ ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, add_seq, ih1, ih2]
· intro p ih
rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, neg_seq, seq_neg, ih]
· intro x₁ x₂ ih1 ih2
rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, add_seq, seq_add, ih1, ih2]
end Monad
universe w
variable {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- The additive group homomorphism `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` induced from a
map `α → β`. -/
def map (f : α → β) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β :=
lift (of ∘ f)
theorem lift_comp {α} {β} {γ} [AddCommGroup γ] (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
lift (g ∘ f) x = lift g (map f x) := by
induction x using FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on with
| C0 => simp only [map_zero]
| C1 => simp only [lift.of, map, Function.comp]
| Cn _ h => simp only [h, AddMonoidHom.map_neg]
| Cp _ _ h₁ h₂ => simp only [h₁, h₂, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
theorem map_id : map id = AddMonoidHom.id (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
Eq.symm <|
lift.ext _ _ fun _ ↦ lift.unique of (AddMonoidHom.id _) fun _ ↦ AddMonoidHom.id_apply _ _
theorem map_id_apply (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : map id x = x := by
rw [map_id]
rfl
theorem map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : map (g ∘ f) = (map g).comp (map f) :=
Eq.symm <| lift.ext _ _ fun _ ↦ by simp [map]
theorem map_comp_apply {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
map (g ∘ f) x = (map g) ((map f) x) := by
rw [map_comp]
rfl
-- version of map_of which uses `map`
@[simp]
| theorem map_of_apply {f : α → β} (a : α) : map f (of a) = of (f a) :=
rfl
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeAbelianGroup.lean | 378 | 380 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.AffineMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
/-!
# The mean value inequality and equalities
In this file we prove the following facts:
* `Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le` : if `f` is differentiable on a convex set `s`
and the norm of its derivative is bounded by `C`, then `f` is Lipschitz continuous on `s` with
constant `C`; also a variant in which what is bounded by `C` is the norm of the difference of the
derivative from a fixed linear map. This lemma and its versions are formulated using `RCLike`,
so they work both for real and complex derivatives.
* `image_le_of*`, `image_norm_le_of_*` : several similar lemmas deducing `f x ≤ B x` or
`‖f x‖ ≤ B x` from upper estimates on `f'` or `‖f'‖`, respectively. These lemmas differ by
their assumptions:
* `of_liminf_*` lemmas assume that limit inferior of some ratio is less than `B' x`;
* `of_deriv_right_*`, `of_norm_deriv_right_*` lemmas assume that the right derivative
or its norm is less than `B' x`;
* `of_*_lt_*` lemmas assume a strict inequality whenever `f x = B x` or `‖f x‖ = B x`;
* `of_*_le_*` lemmas assume a non-strict inequality everywhere on `[a, b)`;
* name of a lemma ends with `'` if (1) it assumes that `B` is continuous on `[a, b]`
and has a right derivative at every point of `[a, b)`, and (2) the lemma has
a counterpart assuming that `B` is differentiable everywhere on `ℝ`
* `norm_image_sub_le_*_segment` : if derivative of `f` on `[a, b]` is bounded above
by a constant `C`, then `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * ‖x - a‖`; several versions deal with
right derivative and derivative within `[a, b]` (`HasDerivWithinAt` or `derivWithin`).
* `Convex.is_const_of_fderivWithin_eq_zero` : if a function has derivative `0` on a convex set `s`,
then it is a constant on `s`.
* `hasStrictFDerivAt_of_hasFDerivAt_of_continuousAt` : a C^1 function over the reals is
strictly differentiable. (This is a corollary of the mean value inequality.)
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-! ### One-dimensional fencing inequalities -/
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
change Icc a b ⊆ { x | f x ≤ B x }
set s := { x | f x ≤ B x } ∩ Icc a b
have A : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x, B x)) (Icc a b) := hf.prodMk hB
have : IsClosed s := by
simp only [s, inter_comm]
exact A.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed isClosed_Icc OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'
apply this.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxB : f x ≤ B x, xab⟩ y hy
rcases hxB.lt_or_eq with hxB | hxB
· -- If `f x < B x`, then all we need is continuity of both sides
refine nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem ?_ (Ioc_mem_nhdsGT hy))
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[Icc a b] x, f x < B x :=
A x (Ico_subset_Icc_self xab) (IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd) hxB)
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] x, f x < B x := nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem xab) this
exact this.mono fun y => le_of_lt
· rcases exists_between (bound x xab hxB) with ⟨r, hfr, hrB⟩
specialize hf' x xab r hfr
have HB : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, r < slope B x z :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' <| lt_irrefl x).1 (hB' x xab).Ioi_of_Ici
(Ioi_mem_nhds hrB)
obtain ⟨z, hfz, hzB, hz⟩ : ∃ z, slope f x z < r ∧ r < slope B x z ∧ z ∈ Ioc x y :=
hf'.and_eventually (HB.and (Ioc_mem_nhdsGT hy)) |>.exists
refine ⟨z, ?_, hz⟩
have := (hfz.trans hzB).le
rwa [slope_def_field, slope_def_field, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (sub_pos.2 hz.1), hxB,
sub_le_sub_iff_right] at this
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(f z - f x) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by `B'`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) {B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
-- `bound` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ B' x`
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, B' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
have Hr : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∀ r > 0, f x ≤ B x + r * (x - a) := fun x hx r hr => by
apply image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf bound
· rwa [sub_self, mul_zero, add_zero]
· exact hB.add (continuousOn_const.mul (continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const))
· intro x hx
exact (hB' x hx).add (((hasDerivWithinAt_id x (Ici x)).sub_const a).const_mul r)
· intro x _ _
rw [mul_one]
exact (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 hr
exact hx
intro x hx
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => B x + r * (x - a)) (Ioi 0) 0 :=
continuousWithinAt_const.add (continuousWithinAt_id.mul continuousWithinAt_const)
convert continuousWithinAt_const.closure_le _ this (Hr x hx) using 1 <;> simp
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative `B'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `f x = B x`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `f a ≤ B a`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `f' x ≤ B' x` on `[a, b)`.
Then `f x ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f' x ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary hf ha hB hB' fun x hx _ hr =>
(hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le (lt_of_le_of_lt (bound x hx) hr)
/-! ### Vector-valued functions `f : ℝ → E` -/
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ}
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `B` has right derivative at every point of `[a, b)`;
* for each `x ∈ [a, b)` the right-side limit inferior of `(‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x)`
is bounded above by a function `f'`;
* we have `f' x < B' x` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. -/
theorem image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope (norm ∘ f) x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) hf' ha hB
hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` and `B` have right derivatives `f'` and `B'` respectively at every point of `[a, b)`;
* the norm of `f'` is strictly less than `B'` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* the norm of `f'` is strictly less than `B'` whenever `‖f x‖ = B x`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` and `B` have right derivatives `f'` and `B'` respectively at every point of `[a, b)`;
* we have `‖f' x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b)`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) ha hB hB'
fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le ((bound x hx).trans_lt hr)
/-- General fencing theorem for continuous functions with an estimate on the norm of the derivative.
Let `f` and `B` be continuous functions on `[a, b]` such that
* `‖f a‖ ≤ B a`;
* `f` has right derivative `f'` at every point of `[a, b)`;
* `B` has derivative `B'` everywhere on `ℝ`;
* we have `‖f' x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b)`.
Then `‖f x‖ ≤ B x` everywhere on `[a, b]`. We use one-sided derivatives in the assumptions
to make this theorem work for piecewise differentiable functions.
-/
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the right derivative bounded by `C`
satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
let g x := f x - f a
have hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b) := hf.sub continuousOn_const
have hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x) (Ici x) x := by
intro x hx
simp [g, hf' x hx]
let B x := C * (x - a)
have hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B C x := by
intro x
simpa using (hasDerivAt_const x C).mul ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub (hasDerivAt_const x a))
convert image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary hg hg' _ hB bound
simp only [g, B]; rw [sub_self, norm_zero, sub_self, mul_zero]
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the derivative within `[a, b]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`, `HasDerivWithinAt`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc a b) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment (fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousWithinAt)
(fun x hx => ?_) bound
exact (hf x <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hx).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem hx)
/-- A function on `[a, b]` with the norm of the derivative within `[a, b]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a)`, `derivWithin`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment {C : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ C) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
| refine norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' ?_ bound
exact fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt
/-- A function on `[0, 1]` with the norm of the derivative within `[0, 1]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C`, `HasDerivWithinAt`
version. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
/-- A function on `[0, 1]` with the norm of the derivative within `[0, 1]`
bounded by `C` satisfies `‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C`, `derivWithin` version. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/MeanValue.lean | 337 | 350 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid on `M.E` which a set `B ⊆ M.E` is a base if and only if
`M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_isBase.imp (fun _ hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I' ⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
obtain rfl : I = B' \ X := hI.eq_of_subset_indep (hB'.indep.diff _)
(subset_diff.2 ⟨hIB', (subset_diff.1 hI.subset).2⟩)
(diff_subset_diff_left hB'.subset_ground)
simp_rw [maximal_subset_iff']
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E, ?_, ⟨⟨inter_subset_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [subset_inter_iff, and_iff_left hI'E, subset_diff, and_iff_right hI'X]
exact Disjoint.mono_right hB'IB <| disjoint_union_right.2
⟨disjoint_sdiff_right.mono_left hI'X , hI'B⟩
· exact ⟨B', hB', (disjoint_sdiff_left (t := X)).mono_left inter_subset_left⟩
· exact inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset
simp only [subset_inter_iff, subset_diff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine fun J hJE B'' hB'' hdj hJX hXJ ↦ ⟨⟨hJX, ?_⟩, hJE⟩
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset, ← union_diff_cancel hJX,
inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, empty_union, diff_eq, ← inter_assoc,
← diff_eq, diff_subset_comm, diff_eq, inter_assoc, ← diff_eq, inter_comm]
exact subset_trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ hB''.subset_ground) hXJ
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
obtain rfl : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩ ?_
exact hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he (subset_union_right.trans hI'B₁))
by_contra hdj'
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hdj'
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues.) -/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.IsBase B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff,
iff_true_intro Or.inl]
instance dual_finite [M.Finite] : M✶.Finite :=
⟨M.ground_finite⟩
instance dual_nonempty [M.Nonempty] : M✶.Nonempty :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty⟩
@[simp] theorem dual_isBase_iff (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) := by
rw [isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase, isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff,
maximal_subset_iff]
simp [dual_indep_iff_exists', hB]
theorem dual_isBase_iff' : M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ∧ B ⊆ M.E :=
(em (B ⊆ M.E)).elim (fun h ↦ by rw [dual_isBase_iff, and_iff_left h])
(fun h ↦ iff_of_false (h ∘ (fun h' ↦ h'.subset_ground)) (h ∘ And.right))
theorem setOf_dual_isBase_eq : {B | M✶.IsBase B} = (fun X ↦ M.E \ X) '' {B | M.IsBase B} := by
ext B
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_image, dual_isBase_iff']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, h.1, diff_diff_cancel_left h.2⟩,
fun ⟨B', hB', h⟩ ↦ ⟨?_,h.symm.trans_subset diff_subset⟩⟩
rwa [← h, diff_diff_cancel_left hB'.subset_ground]
@[simp] theorem dual_dual (M : Matroid α) : M✶✶ = M :=
ext_isBase rfl (fun B (h : B ⊆ M.E) ↦
by rw [dual_isBase_iff, dual_isBase_iff, dual_ground, diff_diff_cancel_left h])
theorem dual_involutive : Function.Involutive (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) := dual_dual
theorem dual_injective : Function.Injective (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) :=
dual_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem dual_inj {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁✶ = M₂✶ ↔ M₁ = M₂ :=
dual_injective.eq_iff
theorem eq_dual_comm {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁ = M₂✶ ↔ M₂ = M₁✶ := by
rw [← dual_inj, dual_dual, eq_comm]
theorem eq_dual_iff_dual_eq {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁ = M₂✶ ↔ M₁✶ = M₂ :=
dual_involutive.eq_iff.symm
theorem IsBase.compl_isBase_of_dual (h : M✶.IsBase B) : M.IsBase (M.E \ B) :=
(dual_isBase_iff'.1 h).1
theorem IsBase.compl_isBase_dual (h : M.IsBase B) : M✶.IsBase (M.E \ B) := by
rwa [dual_isBase_iff, diff_diff_cancel_left h.subset_ground]
theorem IsBase.compl_inter_isBasis_of_inter_isBasis (hB : M.IsBase B) (hBX : M.IsBasis (B ∩ X) X) :
M✶.IsBasis ((M.E \ B) ∩ (M.E \ X)) (M.E \ X) := by
refine Indep.isBasis_of_forall_insert ?_ inter_subset_right (fun e he ↦ ?_)
· rw [dual_indep_iff_exists]
exact ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
simp only [diff_inter_self_eq_diff, mem_diff, not_and, not_not, imp_iff_right he.1.1] at he
simp_rw [dual_dep_iff_forall, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_right he.1.1,
and_iff_left (inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset)]
refine fun B' hB' ↦ by_contra (fun hem ↦ ?_)
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, not_ne_iff, ← union_singleton, diff_inter_diff,
union_inter_distrib_right, union_empty_iff, singleton_inter_eq_empty, diff_eq,
inter_right_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hB'.subset_ground, ← diff_eq,
diff_eq_empty] at hem
obtain ⟨f, hfb, hBf⟩ := hB.exchange hB' ⟨he.2, hem.2⟩
have hi : M.Indep (insert f (B ∩ X)) := by
refine hBf.indep.subset (insert_subset_insert ?_)
simp_rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right inter_subset_left, disjoint_singleton_right,
mem_inter_iff, iff_false_intro he.1.2, and_false, not_false_iff]
exact hfb.2 (hBX.mem_of_insert_indep (Or.elim (hem.1 hfb.1) (False.elim ∘ hfb.2) id) hi).1
theorem IsBase.inter_isBasis_iff_compl_inter_isBasis_dual (hB : M.IsBase B)
(hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis (B ∩ X) X ↔ M✶.IsBasis ((M.E \ B) ∩ (M.E \ X)) (M.E \ X) := by
refine ⟨hB.compl_inter_isBasis_of_inter_isBasis, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hX, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hB.subset_ground] using
hB.compl_isBase_dual.compl_inter_isBasis_of_inter_isBasis h
theorem base_iff_dual_isBase_compl (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBase B ↔ M✶.IsBase (M.E \ B) := by
rw [dual_isBase_iff, diff_diff_cancel_left hB]
theorem ground_not_isBase (M : Matroid α) [h : RankPos M✶] : ¬M.IsBase M.E := by
rwa [rankPos_iff, dual_isBase_iff, diff_empty] at h
theorem IsBase.ssubset_ground [h : RankPos M✶] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B ⊂ M.E :=
hB.subset_ground.ssubset_of_ne (by rintro rfl; exact M.ground_not_isBase hB)
theorem Indep.ssubset_ground [h : RankPos M✶] (hI : M.Indep I) : I ⊂ M.E := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset; exact hB.2.trans_ssubset hB.1.ssubset_ground
/-- A coindependent set of `M` is an independent set of the dual of `M✶`. we give it a separate
definition to enable dot notation. Which spelling is better depends on context. -/
abbrev Coindep (M : Matroid α) (I : Set α) : Prop := M✶.Indep I
theorem coindep_def : M.Coindep X ↔ M✶.Indep X := Iff.rfl
theorem Coindep.indep (hX : M.Coindep X) : M✶.Indep X :=
hX
@[simp] theorem dual_coindep_iff : M✶.Coindep X ↔ M.Indep X := by
rw [Coindep, dual_dual]
theorem Indep.coindep (hI : M.Indep I) : M✶.Coindep I :=
dual_coindep_iff.2 hI
theorem coindep_iff_exists' : M.Coindep X ↔ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B ⊆ M.E \ X) ∧ X ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [Coindep, dual_indep_iff_exists', and_comm (a := _ ⊆ _), and_congr_left_iff, subset_diff]
exact fun _ ↦ ⟨fun ⟨B, hB, hXB⟩ ↦ ⟨B, hB, hB.subset_ground, hXB.symm⟩,
fun ⟨B, hB, _, hBX⟩ ↦ ⟨B, hB, hBX.symm⟩⟩
theorem coindep_iff_exists (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Coindep X ↔ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B ⊆ M.E \ X := by
| rw [coindep_iff_exists', and_iff_left hX]
theorem coindep_iff_subset_compl_isBase : M.Coindep X ↔ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ X ⊆ M.E \ B := by
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 242 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Closure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.Adjoin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.TranscendenceBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.SeparableDegree
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Separable degree
This file contains basics about the separable degree of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `Field.Emb F E`: the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`
(the algebraic closure of `F` is usually used in the literature, but our definition has the
advantage that `Field.Emb F E` lies in the same universe as `E` rather than the maximum over `F`
and `E`). Usually denoted by $\operatorname{Emb}_F(E)$ in textbooks.
- `Field.finSepDegree F E`: the (finite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an extension `E / F`
of fields, defined to be the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic
closure of `E`, as a natural number. It is zero if `Field.Emb F E` is not finite.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense.
**Remark:** the `Cardinal`-valued, potentially infinite separable degree `Field.sepDegree F E`
for a general algebraic extension `E / F` is defined to be the degree of `L / F`, where `L` is
the separable closure of `F` in `E`, which is not defined in this file yet. Later we
will show that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite, then these two
definitions coincide. If `E / F` is algebraic with infinite separable degree, we have
`#(Field.Emb F E) = 2 ^ Field.sepDegree F E` instead.
(See `Field.Emb.cardinal_eq_two_pow_sepDegree` in another file.) For example, if
$F = \mathbb{Q}$ and $E = \mathbb{Q}( \mu_{p^\infty} )$, then $\operatorname{Emb}_F (E)$
is in bijection with $\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$, which is isomorphic to
$\mathbb{Z}_p^\times$, which is uncountable, whereas $ [E:F] $ is countable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
## Main results
- `Field.embEquivOfEquiv`, `Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv`:
a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. In particular, they have the same cardinality (so their
`Field.finSepDegree` are equal).
- `Field.embEquivOfAdjoinSplits`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F`
and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embEquivOfIsAlgClosed`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed.
In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic`, `Field.finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic`:
if `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection `Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`.
In particular, the separable degrees satisfy the tower law: $[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$
(see also `Module.finrank_mul_finrank`).
- `Field.infinite_emb_of_transcendental`: `Field.Emb` is infinite for transcendental extensions.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_le_natDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than
its degree.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff`: the separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is
equal to its degree if and only if it is separable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_splits`: if a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree
is equal to the number of distinct roots of it over `E`.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: the separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_expand`: if a field `F` is of exponential characteristic
`q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f` and `f` have the same separable degree.
- `Polynomial.HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq`: if a polynomial has separable
contraction, then its separable degree is equal to its separable contraction degree.
- `Irreducible.natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree`: the separable degree of an irreducible
polynomial divides its degree.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree`: the separable degree of
`F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff`: if `α` is algebraic over `F`, then
the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a
separable element.
- `Field.finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`: the separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides
the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_le_finrank`: the separable degree of a finite extension `E / F` is smaller
than the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff`: if `E / F` is a finite extension, then its separable degree
is equal to its degree if and only if it is a separable extension.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_simple_iff_isSeparable`: `F⟮x⟯ / F` is a separable extension
if and only if `x` is a separable element.
- `Algebra.IsSeparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both separable, then `K / F` is also
separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, polynomial
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
namespace Field
/-- `Field.Emb F E` is the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure
of `E`. -/
abbrev Emb := E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure E
/-- If `E / F` is an algebraic extension, then the (finite) separable degree of `E / F`
is the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`,
as a natural number. It is defined to be zero if there are infinitely many of them.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense. -/
def finSepDegree : ℕ := Nat.card (Emb F E)
instance instInhabitedEmb : Inhabited (Emb F E) := ⟨IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E _⟩
instance instNeZeroFinSepDegree [FiniteDimensional F E] : NeZero (finSepDegree F E) :=
⟨Nat.card_ne_zero.2 ⟨inferInstance, Fintype.finite <| minpoly.AlgHom.fintype _ _ _⟩⟩
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. -/
def embEquivOfEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Emb F E ≃ Emb F K := AlgEquiv.arrowCongr i <| AlgEquiv.symm <| by
let _ : Algebra E K := i.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K := by
constructor
intro x
have h := isAlgebraic_algebraMap (R := E) (A := K) (i.symm.toAlgHom x)
rw [show ∀ y : E, (algebraMap E K) y = i.toAlgHom y from fun y ↦ rfl] at h
simpa only [AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using h
apply AlgEquiv.restrictScalars (R := F) (S := E)
exact IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K) (AlgebraicClosure E)
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same `Field.finSepDegree`
over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
finSepDegree F E = finSepDegree F K := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfEquiv F E K i)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_self : finSepDegree F F = 1 := by
have : Cardinal.mk (Emb F F) = 1 := le_antisymm
(Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton.2 AlgHom.subsingleton)
(Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _)
rw [finSepDegree, Nat.card, this, Cardinal.one_toNat]
end Field
namespace IntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = 1 := by
rw [finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ (botEquiv F E), finSepDegree_self]
section Tower
variable {F}
variable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot' : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F E :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((botEquiv E K).restrictScalars F)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_top : finSepDegree F (⊤ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F K :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((topEquiv (F := E) (E := K)).restrictScalars F)
end Tower
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every
element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`.
Combined with `Field.instInhabitedEmb`, it can be viewed as a stronger version of
`IntermediateField.nonempty_algHom_of_adjoin_splits`. -/
def embEquivOfAdjoinSplits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
(hS ▸ isAlgebraic_adjoin (S := S) fun x hx ↦ (hK x hx).1)
have halg := (topEquiv (F := F) (E := E)).isAlgebraic
Classical.choice <| Function.Embedding.antisymm
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ splits_of_mem_adjoin F E (S := S) hK (hS ▸ mem_top)) _)
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) _)
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K`
if `E = F(S)` such that every element
`s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K hS hK)
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic
and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
def embEquivOfIsAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K (adjoin_univ F E) fun s _ ↦
⟨Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral s, IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _⟩
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K` as a natural number,
when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
@[stacks 09HJ "We use `finSepDegree` to state a more general result."]
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfIsAlgClosed F E K)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection
`Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`. A corollary of `algHomEquivSigma`. -/
def embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
Emb F E × Emb E K ≃ Emb F K :=
let e : ∀ f : E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure K,
@AlgHom E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra ≃ Emb E K := fun f ↦
(@embEquivOfIsAlgClosed E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra).symm
(algHomEquivSigma (A := F) (B := E) (C := K) (D := AlgebraicClosure K) |>.trans
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProdOfEquiv e) |>.trans <| Equiv.prodCongrLeft <|
fun _ : Emb E K ↦ AlgEquiv.arrowCongr (@AlgEquiv.refl F E _ _ _) <|
(IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K)
(AlgebraicClosure E)).restrictScalars F).symm
/-- If the field extension `E / F` is transcendental, then `Field.Emb F E` is infinite. -/
instance infinite_emb_of_transcendental [H : Algebra.Transcendental F E] : Infinite (Emb F E) := by
obtain ⟨ι, x, hx⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis' F E
have := hx.isAlgebraic_field
rw [← (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F (adjoin F (Set.range x)) E).infinite_iff]
refine @Prod.infinite_of_left _ _ ?_ _
rw [← (embEquivOfEquiv _ _ _ hx.1.aevalEquivField).infinite_iff]
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hx.nonempty_iff_transcendental.2 H
let K := FractionRing (MvPolynomial ι F)
let i1 := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F (MvPolynomial ι F) (AlgebraicClosure K)
have hi1 : Function.Injective i1 := by
rw [IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq _ K]
exact (algebraMap K (AlgebraicClosure K)).injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
let f (n : ℕ) : Emb F K := IsFractionRing.liftAlgHom
(g := i1.comp <| MvPolynomial.aeval fun i : ι ↦ MvPolynomial.X i ^ (n + 1)) <| hi1.comp <| by
simpa [algebraicIndependent_iff_injective_aeval] using
MvPolynomial.algebraicIndependent_polynomial_aeval_X _
fun i : ι ↦ (Polynomial.transcendental_X F).pow n.succ_pos
refine Infinite.of_injective f fun m n h ↦ ?_
replace h : (MvPolynomial.X i) ^ (m + 1) = (MvPolynomial.X i) ^ (n + 1) := hi1 <| by
simpa [f, -map_pow] using congr($h (algebraMap _ K (MvPolynomial.X (R := F) i)))
simpa using congr(MvPolynomial.totalDegree $h)
/-- If the field extension `E / F` is transcendental, then `Field.finSepDegree F E = 0`, which
actually means that `Field.Emb F E` is infinite (see `Field.infinite_emb_of_transcendental`). -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_zero_of_transcendental [Algebra.Transcendental F E] :
finSepDegree F E = 0 := Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic, then their
separable degrees satisfy the tower law
$[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$. See also `Module.finrank_mul_finrank`. -/
@[stacks 09HK "Part 1, `finSepDegree` variant"]
theorem finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic
[Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
finSepDegree F E * finSepDegree E K = finSepDegree F K := by
simpa only [Nat.card_prod] using Nat.card_congr (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F E K)
end Field
namespace Polynomial
variable {F E}
variable (f : F[X])
open Classical in
/-- The separable degree `Polynomial.natSepDegree` of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
This is similar to `Polynomial.natDegree` but not to `Polynomial.degree`, namely, the separable
degree of `0` is `0`, not negative infinity. -/
def natSepDegree : ℕ := (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset.card
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_le_natDegree : f.natSepDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
have := f.map (algebraMap F f.SplittingField) |>.card_roots'
rw [← aroots_def, natDegree_map] at this
classical
exact (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset_card_le.trans this
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C (x : F) : (X - C x).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X_sub_C, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X : (X : F[X]).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
/-- A constant polynomial has zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero (h : f.natDegree = 0) : f.natSepDegree = 0 := by
linarith only [natSepDegree_le_natDegree f, h]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C (x : F) : (C x).natSepDegree = 0 := natSepDegree_eq_zero _ (natDegree_C _)
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_zero : (0 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, natSepDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_one : (1 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, natSepDegree_C]
/-- A non-constant polynomial has non-zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero (h : f.natDegree ≠ 0) : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 := by
rw [natSepDegree, ne_eq, Finset.card_eq_zero, ← ne_eq, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
use rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)
classical
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
exact ⟨ne_of_apply_ne _ h, map_rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)⟩
/-- A polynomial has zero separable degree if and only if it is constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree = 0 ↔ f.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨(natSepDegree_ne_zero f).mtr, natSepDegree_eq_zero f⟩
/-- A polynomial has non-zero separable degree if and only if it is non-constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 ↔ f.natDegree ≠ 0 :=
Iff.not <| natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff f
/-- The separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is equal to its degree if and only if
it is separable. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree ↔ f.Separable := by
classical
simp_rw [← card_rootSet_eq_natDegree_iff_of_splits hf (SplittingField.splits f),
rootSet_def, Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe]
rfl
/-- If a polynomial is separable, then its separable degree is equal to its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := (natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff f h.ne_zero).2 h
variable {f} in
/-- Same as `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable`, but enables the use of
dot notation. -/
theorem Separable.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable f h
/-- If a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over `E`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_splits [DecidableEq E] (h : f.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card := by
classical
rw [aroots, ← (SplittingField.lift f h).comp_algebraMap, ← map_map,
roots_map _ ((splits_id_iff_splits _).mpr <| SplittingField.splits f),
Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (RingHom.injective _), natSepDegree]
variable (E) in
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [DecidableEq E] [IsAlgClosed E] :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card :=
natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f (IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain f)
theorem natSepDegree_map (f : E[X]) (i : E →+* K) : (f.map i).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
let _ := i.toAlgebra
simp_rw [show i = algebraMap E K by rfl, natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure K),
aroots_def, map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_C_mul _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_smul_nonzero {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(x • f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_smul_nonzero _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_pow {n : ℕ} : (f ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_pow]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simp only [h, zero_smul, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.card_empty, ite_true]
simp only [h, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ n h, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(f ^ n).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by simp_rw [natSepDegree_pow, hn, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n : F[X]).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow {x : F} {n : ℕ} :
((X - C x) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul_X_sub_C_pow {x y : F} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * (X - C y) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_C_mul _ hx, natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow]
theorem natSepDegree_mul (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree ≤ f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· simp only [h, natSepDegree_zero, zero_le]
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add]
exact Finset.card_union_le _ _
theorem natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree ↔ (f = 0 ∧ g = 0) ∨ IsCoprime f g := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· rw [mul_eq_zero] at h
wlog hf : f = 0 generalizing f g
· simpa only [mul_comm, add_comm, and_comm,
isCoprime_comm] using this g f h.symm (h.resolve_left hf)
rw [hf, zero_mul, natSepDegree_zero, zero_add, isCoprime_zero_left, isUnit_iff, eq_comm,
natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff, natDegree_eq_zero]
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0
· exact .inl ⟨rfl, by rw [← h, hx, map_zero]⟩
exact .inr ⟨x, Ne.isUnit hx, h⟩
rintro (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨x, -, h⟩)
· exact ⟨0, by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
exact ⟨x, h⟩
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add,
Finset.card_union_eq_card_add_card, Finset.disjoint_iff_ne, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
refine ⟨fun H ↦ .inr (isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (not_and.2 fun _ ↦ h.2)
fun u hu ⟨v, hf⟩ ⟨w, hg⟩ ↦ ?_), ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_aeval_eq_zero
(AlgebraicClosure F) _ (degree_pos_of_irreducible hu).ne'
exact H x ⟨h.1, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hf)⟩
x ⟨h.2, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hg)⟩ rfl
rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | hc)
· exact (h.1 rfl).elim
rintro x hf _ hg rfl
obtain ⟨u, v, hfg⟩ := hc
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hf.2, hg.2, mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_ne_one] using congr(aeval x $hfg)
theorem natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime (g : F[X]) (hc : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree :=
(natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff f g).2 (.inr hc)
theorem natSepDegree_le_of_dvd (g : F[X]) (h1 : f ∣ g) (h2 : g ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree ≤ g.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F)]
| exact Finset.card_le_card <| Multiset.toFinset_subset.mpr <|
Multiset.Le.subset <| roots.le_of_dvd (map_ne_zero h2) <| map_dvd _ h1
/-- If a field `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f`
and `f` have the same separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_expand (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {n : ℕ} :
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableDegree.lean | 469 | 474 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Scan
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Additional theorems and definitions about the `Vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `Vector.cons`.
-/
universe u
variable {α β γ σ φ : Type*} {m n : ℕ}
namespace List.Vector
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
/-- Two `v w : Vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
/-- The empty `Vector` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ (cons a v).toList, p x) :
(cons a v).pmap f hp = cons (f a (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.1))
(v.pmap f (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.2)) := rfl
/-- Opposite direction of `Vector.pmap_cons` -/
theorem pmap_cons' {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(ha : p a) (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
cons (f a ha) (v.pmap f hp) = (cons a v).pmap f (by simpa [ha]) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.map f)[i] = f v[i] := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_map, List.getElem_map]
@[simp]
theorem toList_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).toList = v.toList.pmap f hp := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).head = f v.head (hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, head_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inl rfl) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).tail = v.tail.pmap f (fun x hx ↦ hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inr hx) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.pmap f hp)[i] = f v[i] (hp _ (by simp [getElem_def, List.getElem_mem])) := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_pmap, List.getElem_pmap]
theorem get_eq_get_toList (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias get_eq_get := get_eq_get_toList
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.getElem_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get_toList]
|
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 151 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
/-!
# Results about the grading structure of the clifford algebra
The main result is `CliffordAlgebra.gradedAlgebra`, which says that the clifford algebra is a
ℤ₂-graded algebra (or "superalgebra").
-/
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
open scoped DirectSum
variable (Q)
/-- The even or odd submodule, defined as the supremum of the even or odd powers of
`(ι Q).range`. `evenOdd 0` is the even submodule, and `evenOdd 1` is the odd submodule. -/
def evenOdd (i : ZMod 2) : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
⨆ j : { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (j : ℕ)
theorem one_le_evenOdd_zero : 1 ≤ evenOdd Q 0 := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ ⟨0, Nat.cast_zero⟩)
exact (pow_zero _).ge
theorem range_ι_le_evenOdd_one : LinearMap.range (ι Q) ≤ evenOdd Q 1 := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ ⟨1, Nat.cast_one⟩)
exact (pow_one _).ge
theorem ι_mem_evenOdd_one (m : M) : ι Q m ∈ evenOdd Q 1 :=
| range_ι_le_evenOdd_one Q <| LinearMap.mem_range_self _ m
theorem ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero (m₁ m₂ : M) : ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ ∈ evenOdd Q 0 :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Grading.lean | 40 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Paul Reichert. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul Reichert, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsorBases
/-!
# Intrinsic frontier and interior
This file defines the intrinsic frontier, interior and closure of a set in a normed additive torsor.
These are also known as relative frontier, interior, closure.
The intrinsic frontier/interior/closure of a set `s` is the frontier/interior/closure of `s`
considered as a set in its affine span.
The intrinsic interior is in general greater than the topological interior, the intrinsic frontier
in general less than the topological frontier, and the intrinsic closure in cases of interest the
same as the topological closure.
## Definitions
* `intrinsicInterior`: Intrinsic interior
* `intrinsicFrontier`: Intrinsic frontier
* `intrinsicClosure`: Intrinsic closure
## Results
The main results are:
* `AffineIsometry.image_intrinsicInterior`/`AffineIsometry.image_intrinsicFrontier`/
`AffineIsometry.image_intrinsicClosure`: Intrinsic interiors/frontiers/closures commute with
taking the image under an affine isometry.
* `Set.Nonempty.intrinsicInterior`: The intrinsic interior of a nonempty convex set is nonempty.
## References
* Chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
* Chapter 1 of [Rolf Schneider, *Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski theory*][schneider2013].
## TODO
* `IsClosed s → IsExtreme 𝕜 s (intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s)`
* `x ∈ s → y ∈ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s`
-/
open AffineSubspace Set Topology
open scoped Pointwise
variable {𝕜 V W Q P : Type*}
section AddTorsor
variable (𝕜) [Ring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [TopologicalSpace P] [AddTorsor V P]
{s t : Set P} {x : P}
/-- The intrinsic interior of a set is its interior considered as a set in its affine span. -/
def intrinsicInterior (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' interior ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
/-- The intrinsic frontier of a set is its frontier considered as a set in its affine span. -/
def intrinsicFrontier (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' frontier ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
/-- The intrinsic closure of a set is its closure considered as a set in its affine span. -/
def intrinsicClosure (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' closure ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicInterior :
x ∈ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ interior ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicFrontier :
x ∈ intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ frontier ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicClosure :
x ∈ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ closure ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
theorem intrinsicInterior_subset : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 interior_subset
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 (hs.preimage continuous_induced_dom).frontier_subset
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset_intrinsicClosure : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s :=
image_subset _ frontier_subset_closure
theorem subset_intrinsicClosure : s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s :=
fun x hx => ⟨⟨x, subset_affineSpan _ _ hx⟩, subset_closure hx, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicInterior_empty : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicInterior]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicFrontier_empty : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicFrontier]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicClosure_empty : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicClosure]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicClosure_nonempty : (intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨by simp_rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro h rfl; exact h intrinsicClosure_empty,
Nonempty.mono subset_intrinsicClosure⟩
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.ofIntrinsicClosure, Set.Nonempty.intrinsicClosure⟩ := intrinsicClosure_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicInterior_singleton (x : P) : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 ({x} : Set P) = {x} := by
simp only [intrinsicInterior, preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton, interior_univ, image_univ,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_affineSpan_singleton, setOf_eq_eq_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicFrontier_singleton (x : P) : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 ({x} : Set P) = ∅ := by
rw [intrinsicFrontier, preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton, frontier_univ, image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicClosure_singleton (x : P) : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 ({x} : Set P) = {x} := by
simp only [intrinsicClosure, preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton, closure_univ, image_univ,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_affineSpan_singleton, setOf_eq_eq_singleton]
/-!
Note that neither `intrinsicInterior` nor `intrinsicFrontier` is monotone.
-/
theorem intrinsicClosure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 t := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_
refine ⟨Set.inclusion (affineSpan_mono _ h) x, ?_, rfl⟩
refine (continuous_inclusion (affineSpan_mono _ h)).closure_preimage_subset _ (closure_mono ?_ hx)
| exact fun y hy => h hy
theorem interior_subset_intrinsicInterior : interior s ⊆ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Intrinsic.lean | 136 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
/-!
# Graph cliques
This file defines cliques in simple graphs.
A clique is a set of vertices that are pairwise adjacent.
## Main declarations
* `SimpleGraph.IsClique`: Predicate for a set of vertices to be a clique.
* `SimpleGraph.IsNClique`: Predicate for a set of vertices to be an `n`-clique.
* `SimpleGraph.cliqueFinset`: Finset of `n`-cliques of a graph.
* `SimpleGraph.CliqueFree`: Predicate for a graph to have no `n`-cliques.
-/
open Finset Fintype Function SimpleGraph.Walk
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {α β : Type*} (G H : SimpleGraph α)
/-! ### Cliques -/
section Clique
variable {s t : Set α}
/-- A clique in a graph is a set of vertices that are pairwise adjacent. -/
abbrev IsClique (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Pairwise G.Adj
theorem isClique_iff : G.IsClique s ↔ s.Pairwise G.Adj :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A clique is a set of vertices whose induced graph is complete. -/
theorem isClique_iff_induce_eq : G.IsClique s ↔ G.induce s = ⊤ := by
rw [isClique_iff]
constructor
· intro h
ext ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
simp only [comap_adj, Subtype.coe_mk, top_adj, Ne, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact ⟨Adj.ne, h hv hw⟩
· intro h v hv w hw hne
have h2 : (G.induce s).Adj ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ = _ := rfl
conv_lhs at h2 => rw [h]
simp only [top_adj, ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, eq_iff_iff] at h2
exact h2.1 hne
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {s : Finset α} : Decidable (G.IsClique s) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ G.isClique_iff
variable {G H} {a b : α}
lemma isClique_empty : G.IsClique ∅ := by simp
lemma isClique_singleton (a : α) : G.IsClique {a} := by simp
theorem IsClique.of_subsingleton {G : SimpleGraph α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : G.IsClique s :=
hs.pairwise G.Adj
lemma isClique_pair : G.IsClique {a, b} ↔ a ≠ b → G.Adj a b := Set.pairwise_pair_of_symmetric G.symm
@[simp]
lemma isClique_insert : G.IsClique (insert a s) ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → G.Adj a b :=
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric G.symm
lemma isClique_insert_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) :
G.IsClique (insert a s) ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, G.Adj a b :=
Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric_of_not_mem G.symm ha
lemma IsClique.insert (hs : G.IsClique s) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → G.Adj a b) :
G.IsClique (insert a s) := hs.insert_of_symmetric G.symm h
theorem IsClique.mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.IsClique s → H.IsClique s := Set.Pairwise.mono' h
theorem IsClique.subset (h : t ⊆ s) : G.IsClique s → G.IsClique t := Set.Pairwise.mono h
@[simp]
theorem isClique_bot_iff : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).IsClique s ↔ (s : Set α).Subsingleton :=
Set.pairwise_bot_iff
alias ⟨IsClique.subsingleton, _⟩ := isClique_bot_iff
protected theorem IsClique.map (h : G.IsClique s) {f : α ↪ β} : (G.map f).IsClique (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ hab
exact ⟨a, b, h ha hb <| ne_of_apply_ne _ hab, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem isClique_map_iff_of_nontrivial {f : α ↪ β} {t : Set β} (ht : t.Nontrivial) :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ ∃ (s : Set α), G.IsClique s ∧ f '' s = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ?_, ?_⟩, by rintro ⟨x, hs, rfl⟩; exact hs.map⟩
· rintro x (hx : f x ∈ t) y (hy : f y ∈ t) hne
obtain ⟨u,v, huv, hux, hvy⟩ := h hx hy (by simpa)
rw [EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq] at hux hvy
rwa [← hux, ← hvy]
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_iff]
intro x hxt
obtain ⟨y,hyt, hyne⟩ := ht.exists_ne x
obtain ⟨u,v, -, rfl, rfl⟩ := h hyt hxt hyne
exact Set.mem_range_self _
theorem isClique_map_iff {f : α ↪ β} {t : Set β} :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ t.Subsingleton ∨ ∃ (s : Set α), G.IsClique s ∧ f '' s = t := by
obtain (ht | ht) := t.subsingleton_or_nontrivial
· simp [IsClique.of_subsingleton, ht]
simp [isClique_map_iff_of_nontrivial ht, ht.not_subsingleton]
@[simp] theorem isClique_map_image_iff {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsClique (f '' s) ↔ G.IsClique s := by
rw [isClique_map_iff, f.injective.subsingleton_image_iff]
obtain (hs | hs) := s.subsingleton_or_nontrivial
· simp [hs, IsClique.of_subsingleton]
simp [or_iff_right hs.not_subsingleton, Set.image_eq_image f.injective]
variable {f : α ↪ β} {t : Finset β}
theorem isClique_map_finset_iff_of_nontrivial (ht : t.Nontrivial) :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ ∃ (s : Finset α), G.IsClique s ∧ s.map f = t := by
constructor
· rw [isClique_map_iff_of_nontrivial (by simpa)]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hst⟩
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Set.Finite.exists_finset_coe <|
(show s.Finite from Set.Finite.of_finite_image (by simp [hst]) f.injective.injOn)
exact ⟨s,hs, Finset.coe_inj.1 (by simpa)⟩
rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
simpa using hs.map (f := f)
theorem isClique_map_finset_iff :
(G.map f).IsClique t ↔ #t ≤ 1 ∨ ∃ (s : Finset α), G.IsClique s ∧ s.map f = t := by
obtain (ht | ht) := le_or_lt #t 1
· simp only [ht, true_or, iff_true]
exact IsClique.of_subsingleton <| card_le_one.1 ht
rw [isClique_map_finset_iff_of_nontrivial, ← not_lt]
· simp [ht, Finset.map_eq_image]
exact Finset.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mp ht
protected theorem IsClique.finsetMap {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} (h : G.IsClique s) :
(G.map f).IsClique (s.map f) := by
simpa
/-- If a set of vertices `A` is a clique in subgraph of `G` induced by a superset of `A`,
its embedding is a clique in `G`. -/
theorem IsClique.of_induce {S : Subgraph G} {F : Set α} {A : Set F}
(c : (S.induce F).coe.IsClique A) : G.IsClique (Subtype.val '' A) := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
intro _ ⟨_, ainA⟩ _ ⟨_, binA⟩ anb
exact S.adj_sub (c ainA binA (Subtype.coe_ne_coe.mp anb)).2.2
lemma IsClique.sdiff_of_sup_edge {v w : α} {s : Set α} (hc : (G ⊔ edge v w).IsClique s) :
G.IsClique (s \ {v}) := by
intro _ hx _ hy hxy
have := hc hx.1 hy.1 hxy
simp_all [sup_adj, edge_adj]
lemma isClique_sup_edge_of_ne_sdiff {v w : α} {s : Set α} (h : v ≠ w ) (hv : G.IsClique (s \ {v}))
(hw : G.IsClique (s \ {w})) : (G ⊔ edge v w).IsClique s := by
intro x hx y hy hxy
by_cases h' : x ∈ s \ {v} ∧ y ∈ s \ {v} ∨ x ∈ s \ {w} ∧ y ∈ s \ {w}
· obtain (⟨hx, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, hy⟩) := h'
· exact hv.mono le_sup_left hx hy hxy
· exact hw.mono le_sup_left hx hy hxy
· exact Or.inr ⟨by by_cases x = v <;> aesop, hxy⟩
lemma isClique_sup_edge_of_ne_iff {v w : α} {s : Set α} (h : v ≠ w) :
(G ⊔ edge v w).IsClique s ↔ G.IsClique (s \ {v}) ∧ G.IsClique (s \ {w}) :=
⟨fun h' ↦ ⟨h'.sdiff_of_sup_edge, (edge_comm .. ▸ h').sdiff_of_sup_edge⟩,
fun h' ↦ isClique_sup_edge_of_ne_sdiff h h'.1 h'.2⟩
end Clique
/-! ### `n`-cliques -/
section NClique
variable {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α}
/-- An `n`-clique in a graph is a set of `n` vertices which are pairwise connected. -/
structure IsNClique (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) : Prop where
isClique : G.IsClique s
card_eq : #s = n
theorem isNClique_iff : G.IsNClique n s ↔ G.IsClique s ∧ #s = n :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {n : ℕ} {s : Finset α} :
Decidable (G.IsNClique n s) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ G.isNClique_iff
variable {G H} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma isNClique_empty : G.IsNClique n ∅ ↔ n = 0 := by simp [isNClique_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
lemma isNClique_singleton : G.IsNClique n {a} ↔ n = 1 := by simp [isNClique_iff, eq_comm]
theorem IsNClique.mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.IsNClique n s → H.IsNClique n s := by
simp_rw [isNClique_iff]
exact And.imp_left (IsClique.mono h)
protected theorem IsNClique.map (h : G.IsNClique n s) {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsNClique n (s.map f) :=
⟨by rw [coe_map]; exact h.1.map, (card_map _).trans h.2⟩
theorem isNClique_map_iff (hn : 1 < n) {t : Finset β} {f : α ↪ β} :
(G.map f).IsNClique n t ↔ ∃ s : Finset α, G.IsNClique n s ∧ s.map f = t := by
rw [isNClique_iff, isClique_map_finset_iff, or_and_right,
or_iff_right (by rintro ⟨h', rfl⟩; exact h'.not_lt hn)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
simp [isNClique_iff, hs]
rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
simp [hs.card_eq, hs.isClique]
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_bot_iff : (⊥ : SimpleGraph α).IsNClique n s ↔ n ≤ 1 ∧ #s = n := by
rw [isNClique_iff, isClique_bot_iff]
refine and_congr_left ?_
rintro rfl
exact card_le_one.symm
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_zero : G.IsNClique 0 s ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, Finset.card_eq_zero, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; rintro rfl; simp
@[simp]
theorem isNClique_one : G.IsNClique 1 s ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
simp only [isNClique_iff, card_eq_one, and_iff_right_iff_imp]; rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; simp
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
protected theorem IsNClique.insert (hs : G.IsNClique n s) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, G.Adj a b) :
G.IsNClique (n + 1) (insert a s) := by
constructor
· push_cast
exact hs.1.insert fun b hb _ => h _ hb
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem fun ha => (h _ ha).ne rfl, hs.2]
lemma IsNClique.erase_of_mem (hs : G.IsNClique n s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
G.IsNClique (n - 1) (s.erase a) where
isClique := hs.isClique.subset <| by simp
| card_eq := by rw [card_erase_of_mem ha, hs.2]
protected lemma IsNClique.insert_erase
(hs : G.IsNClique n s) (ha : ∀ w ∈ s \ {b}, G.Adj a w) (hb : b ∈ s) :
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Clique.lean | 256 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Embedding
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Supported
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Lemmas about the support of a finitely supported function
-/
open scoped Pointwise
universe u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace MonoidAlgebra
open Finset Finsupp
variable {k : Type u₁} {G : Type u₂} [Semiring k]
theorem support_mul [Mul G] [DecidableEq G] (a b : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
(a * b).support ⊆ a.support * b.support := by
rw [MonoidAlgebra.mul_def]
exact support_sum.trans <| biUnion_subset.2 fun _x hx ↦
support_sum.trans <| biUnion_subset.2 fun _y hy ↦
support_single_subset.trans <| singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_image₂_of_mem hx hy
theorem support_single_mul_subset [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (a : G) :
(single a r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support ⊆ Finset.image (a * ·) f.support :=
(support_mul _ _).trans <| (Finset.image₂_subset_right support_single_subset).trans <| by
rw [Finset.image₂_singleton_left]
theorem support_mul_single_subset [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (a : G) :
(f * single a r).support ⊆ Finset.image (· * a) f.support :=
(support_mul _ _).trans <| (Finset.image₂_subset_left support_single_subset).trans <| by
rw [Finset.image₂_singleton_right]
theorem support_single_mul_eq_image [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k}
(hr : ∀ y, r * y = 0 ↔ y = 0) {x : G} (lx : IsLeftRegular x) :
(single x r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support = Finset.image (x * ·) f.support := by
refine subset_antisymm (support_single_mul_subset f _ _) fun y hy => ?_
obtain ⟨y, yf, rfl⟩ : ∃ a : G, a ∈ f.support ∧ x * a = y := by
simpa only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop] using hy
simp only [mul_apply, mem_support_iff.mp yf, hr, mem_support_iff, sum_single_index,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Ne, not_false_iff, if_true, zero_mul, ite_self, sum_zero, lx.eq_iff]
theorem support_mul_single_eq_image [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k}
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) {x : G} (rx : IsRightRegular x) :
(f * single x r).support = Finset.image (· * x) f.support := by
refine subset_antisymm (support_mul_single_subset f _ _) fun y hy => ?_
obtain ⟨y, yf, rfl⟩ : ∃ a : G, a ∈ f.support ∧ a * x = y := by
simpa only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop] using hy
simp only [mul_apply, mem_support_iff.mp yf, hr, mem_support_iff, sum_single_index,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Ne, not_false_iff, if_true, mul_zero, ite_self, sum_zero, rx.eq_iff]
theorem support_mul_single [Mul G] [IsRightCancelMul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(f * single x r).support = f.support.map (mulRightEmbedding x) := by
classical
ext
| simp only [support_mul_single_eq_image f hr (IsRightRegular.all x),
mem_image, mem_map, mulRightEmbedding_apply]
theorem support_single_mul [Mul G] [IsLeftCancelMul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, r * y = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(single x r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support = f.support.map (mulLeftEmbedding x) := by
classical
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Support.lean | 65 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
/-!
# Images of pairs of submodules under bilinear maps
This file provides `Submodule.map₂`, which is later used to implement `Submodule.mul`.
## Main results
* `Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2`: the image of two submodules under a bilinear map is the span of
their `Set.image2`.
## Notes
This file is quite similar to the n-ary section of `Data.Set.Basic` and to `Order.Filter.NAry`.
Please keep them in sync.
-/
universe uι u v
open Set
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
variable {ι : Sort uι} {R M N P : Type*}
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
/-- Map a pair of submodules under a bilinear map.
This is the submodule version of `Set.image2`. -/
def map₂ (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R N) : Submodule R P :=
⨆ s : p, q.map (f s)
theorem apply_mem_map₂ (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) {m : M} {n : N} {p : Submodule R M}
{q : Submodule R N} (hm : m ∈ p) (hn : n ∈ q) : f m n ∈ map₂ f p q :=
(le_iSup _ ⟨m, hm⟩ : _ ≤ map₂ f p q) ⟨n, hn, by rfl⟩
theorem map₂_le {f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P} {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R N}
{r : Submodule R P} : map₂ f p q ≤ r ↔ ∀ m ∈ p, ∀ n ∈ q, f m n ∈ r :=
⟨fun H _m hm _n hn => H <| apply_mem_map₂ _ hm hn, fun H =>
iSup_le fun ⟨m, hm⟩ => map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun n hn => H m hm n hn⟩
variable (R) in
theorem map₂_span_span (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (s : Set M) (t : Set N) :
map₂ f (span R s) (span R t) = span R (Set.image2 (fun m n => f m n) s t) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [map₂_le]
apply @span_induction R M _ _ _ s
on_goal 1 =>
intro a ha
apply @span_induction R N _ _ _ t
· intro b hb
exact subset_span ⟨_, ‹_›, _, ‹_›, rfl⟩
all_goals
intros
simp only [*, add_mem, smul_mem, zero_mem, map_zero, map_add,
LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul]
· rw [span_le, image2_subset_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact apply_mem_map₂ _ (subset_span ha) (subset_span hb)
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_right (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p : Submodule R M) : map₂ f p ⊥ = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <|
map₂_le.2 fun m _hm n hn => by
rw [Submodule.mem_bot] at hn
rw [hn, LinearMap.map_zero]; simp only [mem_bot]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_left (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (q : Submodule R N) : map₂ f ⊥ q = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <|
map₂_le.2 fun m hm n _ => by
rw [Submodule.mem_bot] at hm ⊢
rw [hm, LinearMap.map_zero₂]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem map₂_le_map₂ {f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P} {p₁ p₂ : Submodule R M} {q₁ q₂ : Submodule R N}
(hp : p₁ ≤ p₂) (hq : q₁ ≤ q₂) : map₂ f p₁ q₁ ≤ map₂ f p₂ q₂ :=
map₂_le.2 fun _m hm _n hn => apply_mem_map₂ _ (hp hm) (hq hn)
theorem map₂_le_map₂_left {f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P} {p₁ p₂ : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R N}
(h : p₁ ≤ p₂) : map₂ f p₁ q ≤ map₂ f p₂ q :=
map₂_le_map₂ h (le_refl q)
theorem map₂_le_map₂_right {f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P} {p : Submodule R M} {q₁ q₂ : Submodule R N}
(h : q₁ ≤ q₂) : map₂ f p q₁ ≤ map₂ f p q₂ :=
map₂_le_map₂ (le_refl p) h
theorem map₂_sup_right (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p : Submodule R M) (q₁ q₂ : Submodule R N) :
map₂ f p (q₁ ⊔ q₂) = map₂ f p q₁ ⊔ map₂ f p q₂ :=
le_antisymm
(map₂_le.2 fun _m hm _np hnp =>
let ⟨_n, hn, _p, hp, hnp⟩ := mem_sup.1 hnp
mem_sup.2 ⟨_, apply_mem_map₂ _ hm hn, _, apply_mem_map₂ _ hm hp, hnp ▸ (map_add _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (map₂_le_map₂_right le_sup_left) (map₂_le_map₂_right le_sup_right))
theorem map₂_sup_left (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p₁ p₂ : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R N) :
map₂ f (p₁ ⊔ p₂) q = map₂ f p₁ q ⊔ map₂ f p₂ q :=
le_antisymm
(map₂_le.2 fun _mn hmn _p hp =>
let ⟨_m, hm, _n, hn, hmn⟩ := mem_sup.1 hmn
mem_sup.2
⟨_, apply_mem_map₂ _ hm hp, _, apply_mem_map₂ _ hn hp,
hmn ▸ (LinearMap.map_add₂ _ _ _ _).symm⟩)
(sup_le (map₂_le_map₂_left le_sup_left) (map₂_le_map₂_left le_sup_right))
theorem image2_subset_map₂ (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R N) :
Set.image2 (fun m n => f m n) (↑p : Set M) (↑q : Set N) ⊆ (↑(map₂ f p q) : Set P) := by
rintro _ ⟨i, hi, j, hj, rfl⟩
exact apply_mem_map₂ _ hi hj
theorem map₂_eq_span_image2 (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R N) :
map₂ f p q = span R (Set.image2 (fun m n => f m n) (p : Set M) (q : Set N)) := by
rw [← map₂_span_span, span_eq, span_eq]
theorem map₂_flip (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R N) :
map₂ f.flip q p = map₂ f p q := by
rw [map₂_eq_span_image2, map₂_eq_span_image2, Set.image2_swap]
rfl
theorem map₂_iSup_left (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (s : ι → Submodule R M) (t : Submodule R N) :
map₂ f (⨆ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, map₂ f (s i) t := by
suffices map₂ f (⨆ i, span R (s i : Set M)) (span R t) = ⨆ i, map₂ f (span R (s i)) (span R t) by
simpa only [span_eq] using this
simp_rw [map₂_span_span, ← span_iUnion, map₂_span_span, Set.image2_iUnion_left]
theorem map₂_iSup_right (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (s : Submodule R M) (t : ι → Submodule R N) :
map₂ f s (⨆ i, t i) = ⨆ i, map₂ f s (t i) := by
suffices map₂ f (span R s) (⨆ i, span R (t i : Set N)) = ⨆ i, map₂ f (span R s) (span R (t i)) by
simpa only [span_eq] using this
simp_rw [map₂_span_span, ← span_iUnion, map₂_span_span, Set.image2_iUnion_right]
theorem map₂_span_singleton_eq_map (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) :
map₂ f (span R {m}) = map (f m) := by
funext s
rw [← span_eq s, map₂_span_span, image2_singleton_left, map_span]
theorem map₂_span_singleton_eq_map_flip (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (s : Submodule R M) (n : N) :
map₂ f s (span R {n}) = map (f.flip n) s := by rw [← map₂_span_singleton_eq_map, map₂_flip]
end Submodule
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Bilinear.lean | 153 | 157 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.L1
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.VitaliCaratheodory
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 171 | 172 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,626 | 1,627 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.IntegralCompProd
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.StandardBorel
/-!
# Lebesgue and Bochner integrals of conditional kernels
Integrals of `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel` and `MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_condKernel`: the integral
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)` is equal to
`∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a)`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.setIntegral_condKernel`:
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ`
Corresponding statements for the Lebesgue integral and/or without the sets `s` and `t` are also
provided.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β Ω : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem (a : α) {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x) (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
simp_rw [Kernel.compProd_apply hs]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : κ a (s ×ˢ t) = (Kernel.fst κ ⊗ₖ Kernel.condKernel κ) a (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (κ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, Kernel.compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s ×ˢ t}
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [Set.preimage, this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ hf]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.setLIntegral_compProd _ _ _ hf hs ht]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a hs MeasurableSet.univ]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a MeasurableSet.univ ht]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Lintegral
section Integral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{E : Type*} {f : β × Ω → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_condKernel (a : α)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (κ a)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x)))
(Kernel.fst κ a) := by
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd hf
lemma integral_condKernel (a : α) (hf : Integrable f (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [integral_compProd hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [setIntegral_compProd hs ht hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ Set.univ) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a hs MeasurableSet.univ hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (a : α) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a MeasurableSet.univ ht hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Integral
end ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {β Ω : Type*} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
| variable {ρ : Measure (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, ρ.condKernel x {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂ρ.fst = ρ s := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Integral.lean | 134 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sets
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
/-!
# Instances for finite types
This file is a collection of basic `Fintype` instances for types such as `Fin`, `Prod` and pi types.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Finset.val_univ_fin (n : ℕ) : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).val = List.finRange n := rfl
/-- See also `nonempty_encodable`, `nonempty_denumerable`. -/
theorem nonempty_fintype (α : Type*) [Finite α] : Nonempty (Fintype α) := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨.ofEquiv _ e.symm⟩
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_castSucc (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.castSucc = {Fin.last n}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_last, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
/- The following three lemmas use `Finset.cons` instead of `insert` and `Finset.map` instead of
`Finset.image` to reduce proof obligations downstream. -/
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons 0 (univ.map ⟨Fin.succ, Fin.succ_injective _⟩) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `Fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_castSuccEmb (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons (Fin.last n) (univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succAbove (n : ℕ) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) = Finset.cons p (univ.map <| Fin.succAboveEmb p) (by simp) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_get [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
Finset.univ.image l.get = l.toFinset := by
simp [univ_image_def]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_getElem' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp only [univ_image_def, List.ofFn_getElem_eq_map]
theorem Fin.univ_image_get' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (f <| l.get ·) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp
@[instance]
def Unique.fintype {α : Type*} [Unique α] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton default
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq (y : α) : Fintype { x // x = y } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp)
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq' (y : α) : Fintype { x // y = x } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp [eq_comm])
theorem Fintype.univ_empty : @univ Empty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.univ_pempty : @univ PEmpty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
instance Unit.fintype : Fintype Unit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton ()
theorem Fintype.univ_unit : @univ Unit _ = {()} :=
rfl
instance PUnit.fintype : Fintype PUnit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton PUnit.unit
theorem Fintype.univ_punit : @univ PUnit _ = {PUnit.unit} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.univ_bool : @univ Bool _ = {true, false} :=
rfl
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodLeft {α β} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty β] : Fintype α :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.fst, fun a => by simp⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodRight {α β} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty α] : Fintype β :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.snd, fun b => by simp⟩
instance ULift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (ULift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift.symm
instance PLift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (PLift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift.symm
instance PLift.fintypeProp (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Fintype (PLift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, fun ⟨h⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
instance Quotient.fintype [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
Fintype (Quotient s) :=
Fintype.ofSurjective Quotient.mk'' Quotient.mk''_surjective
instance PSigma.fintypePropLeft {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Fintype (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : α then Fintype.ofEquiv (β h) ⟨fun x => ⟨h, x⟩, PSigma.snd, fun _ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, fun x => (h x.1).elim⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropRight {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv { a // β a }
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropProp {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, fun ⟨x, y⟩ =>
(h ⟨x, y⟩).elim⟩
instance pfunFintype (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, Fintype (α hp)] :
Fintype (∀ hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then Fintype.ofEquiv (α hp) ⟨fun a _ => a, fun f => f hp, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton fun h => (hp h).elim, fun h => mem_singleton.2
(funext fun x => by contradiction)⟩
section Trunc
/-- For `s : Multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `Trunc α`.
-/
def truncOfMultisetExistsMem {α} (s : Multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → Trunc α :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l h =>
match l, h with
| [], _ => False.elim (by tauto)
| a :: _, _ => Trunc.mk a
/-- A `Nonempty` `Fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfNonemptyFintype (α) [Nonempty α] [Fintype α] : Trunc α :=
truncOfMultisetExistsMem Finset.univ.val (by simp)
/-- By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `Trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def truncSigmaOfExists {α} [Fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
Trunc (Σ'a, P a) :=
@truncOfNonemptyFintype (Σ'a, P a) ((Exists.elim h) fun a ha => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end Trunc
namespace Multiset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem count_univ [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : count a Finset.univ.val = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem Finset.univ.nodup (Finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_val_equiv (e : α ≃ β) :
map e univ.val = univ.val := by
rw [← congr_arg Finset.val (Finset.map_univ_equiv e), Finset.map_val, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
/-- For functions on finite sets, they are bijections iff they map universes into universes. -/
@[simp]
theorem bijective_iff_map_univ_eq_univ (f : α → β) :
f.Bijective ↔ map f (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = univ.val :=
⟨fun bij ↦ congr_arg (·.val) (map_univ_equiv <| Equiv.ofBijective f bij),
fun eq ↦ ⟨
fun a₁ a₂ ↦ inj_on_of_nodup_map (eq.symm ▸ univ.nodup) _ (mem_univ a₁) _ (mem_univ a₂),
fun b ↦ have ⟨a, _, h⟩ := mem_map.mp (eq.symm ▸ mem_univ_val b); ⟨a, h⟩⟩⟩
end Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition to show `exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists`. -/
noncomputable def seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) : ℕ → α
| n =>
Classical.choose
(h
(Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h i)
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m < n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
(h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (f m) (f n) := by
classical
have : Nonempty α := by
rcases h ∅ (by simp) with ⟨y, _⟩
exact ⟨y⟩
choose! F hF using h
have h' : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y := fun s => ⟨F s, hF s⟩
set f := seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h' with hf
have A : ∀ n : ℕ, P (f n) := by
intro n
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
have IH' : ∀ x : Fin n, P (f x) := fun n => IH n.1 n.2
rw [hf, seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
exact
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
(by simp [IH'])).1
refine ⟨f, A, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
conv_rhs => rw [hf]
rw [seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
apply
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)))) (by simp [A])).2
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
symmetric relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m ≠ n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
[IsSymm α r] (h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ Pairwise (r on f) := by
rcases exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists P r h with ⟨f, hf, hf'⟩
refine ⟨f, hf, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | rfl | h)
· exact hf' m n h
· exact (hmn rfl).elim
· unfold Function.onFun
apply symm
exact hf' n m h
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 856 | 859 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Measurability of `⌊x⌋` etc
In this file we prove that `Int.floor`, `Int.ceil`, `Int.fract`, `Nat.floor`, and `Nat.ceil` are
measurable under some assumptions on the (semi)ring.
-/
open Set
section FloorRing
variable {α R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [FloorRing R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [OrderTopology R] [MeasurableSpace R]
theorem Int.measurable_floor [OpensMeasurableSpace R] : Measurable (Int.floor : R → ℤ) :=
measurable_to_countable fun x => by
simpa only [Int.preimage_floor_singleton] using measurableSet_Ico
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.floor [OpensMeasurableSpace R] {f : α → R} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun x => ⌊f x⌋ :=
Int.measurable_floor.comp hf
theorem Int.measurable_ceil [OpensMeasurableSpace R] : Measurable (Int.ceil : R → ℤ) :=
measurable_to_countable fun x => by
simpa only [Int.preimage_ceil_singleton] using measurableSet_Ioc
| @[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.ceil [OpensMeasurableSpace R] {f : α → R} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun x => ⌈f x⌉ :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Floor.lean | 36 | 38 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
/-!
# Group actions by isometries
In this file we define two typeclasses:
- `IsIsometricSMul M X` says that `M` multiplicatively acts on a (pseudo extended) metric space
`X` by isometries;
- `IsIsometricVAdd` is an additive version of `IsIsometricSMul`.
We also prove basic facts about isometric actions and define bundled isometries
`IsometryEquiv.constSMul`, `IsometryEquiv.mulLeft`, `IsometryEquiv.mulRight`,
`IsometryEquiv.divLeft`, `IsometryEquiv.divRight`, and `IsometryEquiv.inv`, as well as their
additive versions.
If `G` is a group, then `IsIsometricSMul G G` means that `G` has a left-invariant metric while
`IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G` means that `G` has a right-invariant metric. For a commutative group,
these two notions are equivalent. A group with a right-invariant metric can be also represented as a
`NormedGroup`.
-/
open Set
open ENNReal Pointwise
universe u v w
variable (M : Type u) (G : Type v) (X : Type w)
/-- An additive action is isometric if each map `x ↦ c +ᵥ x` is an isometry. -/
class IsIsometricVAdd [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [VAdd M X] : Prop where
protected isometry_vadd : ∀ c : M, Isometry ((c +ᵥ ·) : X → X)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias IsometricVAdd := IsIsometricVAdd
/-- A multiplicative action is isometric if each map `x ↦ c • x` is an isometry. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsIsometricSMul [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] : Prop where
protected isometry_smul : ∀ c : M, Isometry ((c • ·) : X → X)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")] alias IsometricSMul := IsIsometricSMul
-- Porting note: Lean 4 doesn't support `[]` in classes, so make a lemma instead of `export`ing
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_smul {M : Type u} (X : Type w) [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) : Isometry (c • · : X → X) :=
IsIsometricSMul.isometry_smul c
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) IsIsometricSMul.to_continuousConstSMul [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[IsIsometricSMul M X] : ContinuousConstSMul M X :=
⟨fun c => (isometry_smul X c).continuous⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) IsIsometricSMul.opposite_of_comm [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [SMul M X]
[SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X] [IsCentralScalar M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] : IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ X :=
⟨fun c x y => by simpa only [← op_smul_eq_smul] using isometry_smul X c.unop x y⟩
variable {M G X}
section EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace X] [Group G] [MulAction G X] [IsIsometricSMul G X]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_smul_left [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
edist (c • x) (c • y) = edist x y :=
isometry_smul X c x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ediam_smul [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (s : Set X) :
EMetric.diam (c • s) = EMetric.diam s :=
(isometry_smul _ _).ediam_image s
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_mul_left [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a : M) :
Isometry (a * ·) :=
isometry_smul M a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_mul_left [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
edist (a * b) (a * c) = edist b c :=
isometry_mul_left a b c
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a : M) :
Isometry fun x => x * a :=
isometry_smul M (MulOpposite.op a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
edist (a * c) (b * c) = edist a b :=
isometry_mul_right c a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoEMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : edist (a / c) (b / c) = edist a b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_inv_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(a b : G) : edist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = edist a b := by
rw [← edist_mul_left a, ← edist_mul_right _ _ b, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_right,
edist_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem isometry_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] :
Isometry (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
edist_inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_inv [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(x y : G) : edist x⁻¹ y = edist x y⁻¹ := by rw [← edist_inv_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_div_left [PseudoEMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
(a b c : G) : edist (a / b) (a / c) = edist b c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, edist_mul_left, edist_inv_inv]
namespace IsometryEquiv
/-- If a group `G` acts on `X` by isometries, then `IsometryEquiv.constSMul` is the isometry of
`X` given by multiplication of a constant element of the group. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! toEquiv apply) "If an additive group `G` acts on `X` by isometries,
then `IsometryEquiv.constVAdd` is the isometry of `X` given by addition of a constant element of the
group."]
def constSMul (c : G) : X ≃ᵢ X where
toEquiv := MulAction.toPerm c
isometry_toFun := isometry_smul X c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem constSMul_symm (c : G) : (constSMul c : X ≃ᵢ X).symm = constSMul c⁻¹ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace G]
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ x * y` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Addition `y ↦ x + y` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def mulLeft [IsIsometricSMul G G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.mulLeft c
isometry_toFun := edist_mul_left c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulLeft_symm [IsIsometricSMul G G] (x : G) :
(mulLeft x).symm = IsometryEquiv.mulLeft x⁻¹ :=
constSMul_symm x
/-- Multiplication `y ↦ y * x` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Addition `y ↦ y + x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def mulRight [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.mulRight c
isometry_toFun a b := edist_mul_right a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRight_symm [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (x : G) : (mulRight x).symm = mulRight x⁻¹ :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Division `y ↦ y / x` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Subtraction `y ↦ y - x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def divRight [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.divRight c
isometry_toFun a b := edist_div_right a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem divRight_symm [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (c : G) : (divRight c).symm = mulRight c :=
ext fun _ => rfl
variable [IsIsometricSMul G G] [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G]
/-- Division `y ↦ x / y` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply symm_apply toEquiv)
"Subtraction `y ↦ x - y` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def divLeft (c : G) : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.divLeft c
isometry_toFun := edist_div_left c
variable (G)
/-- Inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! apply toEquiv) "Negation `x ↦ -x` as an `IsometryEquiv`."]
def inv : G ≃ᵢ G where
toEquiv := Equiv.inv G
isometry_toFun := edist_inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem inv_symm : (inv G).symm = inv G := rfl
end IsometryEquiv
namespace EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_emetric_ball _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_ball (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' ball x r = ball (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_ball]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : c • closedBall x r = closedBall (c • x) r :=
(IsometryEquiv.constSMul c).image_emetric_closedBall _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_smul_closedBall (c : G) (x : X) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(c • ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r = closedBall (c⁻¹ • x) r := by
rw [preimage_smul, smul_closedBall]
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_ball [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_ball a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_ball [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' ball b r = ball (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_ball (MulOpposite.op a) b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_left_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul G G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (a⁻¹ * b) r :=
preimage_smul_closedBall a b r
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_right_closedBall [IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
(fun x => x * a) ⁻¹' closedBall b r = closedBall (b / a) r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact preimage_smul_closedBall (MulOpposite.op a) b r
end EMetric
end EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
dist (c • x) (c • y) = dist x y :=
(isometry_smul X c).dist_eq x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (x y : X) :
nndist (c • x) (c • y) = nndist x y :=
(isometry_smul X c).nndist_eq x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem diam_smul [PseudoMetricSpace X] [SMul M X] [IsIsometricSMul M X] (c : M) (s : Set X) :
Metric.diam (c • s) = Metric.diam s :=
(isometry_smul _ _).diam_image s
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_left [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
dist (a * b) (a * c) = dist b c :=
dist_smul a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_mul_left [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul M M] (a b c : M) :
nndist (a * b) (a * c) = nndist b c :=
nndist_smul a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_right [Mul M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
dist (a * c) (b * c) = dist a b :=
dist_smul (MulOpposite.op c) a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_mul_right [PseudoMetricSpace M] [Mul M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M] (a b c : M) :
nndist (a * c) (b * c) = nndist a b :=
nndist_smul (MulOpposite.op c) a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : dist (a / c) (b / c) = dist a b := by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_div_right [DivInvMonoid M] [PseudoMetricSpace M] [IsIsometricSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M]
(a b c : M) : nndist (a / c) (b / c) = nndist a b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, nndist_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_inv_inv [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) : dist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = dist a b :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv G).dist_eq a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_inv_inv [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b : G) : nndist a⁻¹ b⁻¹ = nndist a b :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv G).nndist_eq a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_left [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b c : G) : dist (a / b) (a / c) = dist b c := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_div_left [Group G] [PseudoMetricSpace G] [IsIsometricSMul G G]
[IsIsometricSMul Gᵐᵒᵖ G] (a b c : G) : nndist (a / b) (a / c) = nndist b c := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
|
/-- If `G` acts isometrically on `X`, then the image of a bounded set in `X` under scalar
multiplication by `c : G` is bounded. See also `Bornology.IsBounded.smul₀` for a similar lemma about
normed spaces. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/IsometricSMul.lean | 310 | 313 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Unitization
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
/-!
# Relating unital and non-unital substructures
This file relates various algebraic structures and provides maps (generally algebra homomorphisms),
from the unitization of a non-unital subobject into the full structure. The range of this map is
the unital closure of the non-unital subobject (e.g., `Algebra.adjoin`, `Subring.closure`,
`Subsemiring.closure` or `StarAlgebra.adjoin`). When the underlying scalar ring is a field, for
this map to be injective it suffices that the range omits `1`. In this setting we provide suitable
`AlgEquiv` (or `StarAlgEquiv`) onto the range.
## Main declarations
* `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization s : Unitization R s →ₐ[R] A`:
where `s` is a non-unital subalgebra of a unital `R`-algebra `A`, this is the natural algebra
homomorphism sending `(r, a)` to `r • 1 + a`. The range of this map is
`Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)`.
* `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitizationAlgEquiv s : Unitization R s ≃ₐ[R] Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)`
when `R` is a field and `1 ∉ s`. This is `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization` upgraded to an
`AlgEquiv` onto its range.
* `NonUnitalSubsemiring.unitization : Unitization ℕ s →ₐ[ℕ] R`: the natural `ℕ`-algebra homomorphism
from the unitization of a non-unital subsemiring `s` into the ring containing it. The range of
this map is `subalgebraOfSubsemiring (Subsemiring.closure s)`.
This is just `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization s` but we provide a separate declaration because
there is an instance Lean can't find on its own due to `outParam`.
* `NonUnitalSubring.unitization : Unitization ℤ s →ₐ[ℤ] R`:
the natural `ℤ`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subring `s` into the
ring containing it. The range of this map is `subalgebraOfSubring (Subring.closure s)`.
This is just `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization s` but we provide a separate declaration because
there is an instance Lean can't find on its own due to `outParam`.
* `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra s : Unitization R s →⋆ₐ[R] A`: a version of
`NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization` for star algebras.
* `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.unitizationStarAlgEquiv s :`
`Unitization R s ≃⋆ₐ[R] StarAlgebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)`:
a version of `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitizationAlgEquiv` for star algebras.
-/
/-! ## Subalgebras -/
namespace Unitization
variable {R A C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C]
theorem lift_range_le {f : A →ₙₐ[R] C} {S : Subalgebra R C} :
(lift f).range ≤ S ↔ NonUnitalAlgHom.range f ≤ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact @h (f x) ⟨x, by simp⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x with
| _ r a => simpa using add_mem (algebraMap_mem S r) (h ⟨a, rfl⟩)
theorem lift_range (f : A →ₙₐ[R] C) :
(lift f).range = Algebra.adjoin R (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f : Set C) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ by rw [lift_range_le, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]; rfl
end Unitization
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
section Semiring
variable {R S A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [SetLike S A]
[hSA : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
/-- The natural `R`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subalgebra into
the algebra containing it. -/
def unitization : Unitization R s →ₐ[R] A :=
Unitization.lift (NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype s)
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization R s) :
unitization s x = algebraMap R A x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range : (unitization s).range = Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) := by
rw [unitization, Unitization.lift_range]
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_range, NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.coe_subtype,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, SetLike.mem_coe]
rfl
end Semiring
/-- A sufficient condition for injectivity of `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization` when the scalars
are a commutative ring. When the scalars are a field, one should use the more natural
`NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.unitization_injective` whose hypothesis is easier to verify. -/
theorem _root_.AlgHomClass.unitization_injective' {F R S A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A]
[Algebra R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) (h : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → algebraMap R A r ∉ s)
[FunLike F (Unitization R s) A] [AlgHomClass F R (Unitization R s) A]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : s, f x = x) : Function.Injective f := by
refine (injective_iff_map_eq_zero f).mpr fun x hx => ?_
induction x with
| inl_add_inr r a =>
simp_rw [map_add, hf, ← Unitization.algebraMap_eq_inl, AlgHomClass.commutes] at hx
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at hx ⊢
by_cases hr : r = 0
· ext
· simp [hr]
· simpa [hr] using hx
· exact (h r hr <| hx ▸ (neg_mem a.property)).elim
/-- This is a generic version which allows us to prove both
`NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization_injective` and `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.unitization_injective`. -/
theorem _root_.AlgHomClass.unitization_injective {F R S A : Type*} [Field R] [Ring A]
[Algebra R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) (h1 : 1 ∉ s) [FunLike F (Unitization R s) A] [AlgHomClass F R (Unitization R s) A]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : s, f x = x) : Function.Injective f := by
refine AlgHomClass.unitization_injective' s (fun r hr hr' ↦ ?_) f hf
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] at hr'
exact h1 <| inv_smul_smul₀ hr (1 : A) ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r⁻¹ hr'
section Field
variable {R S A : Type*} [Field R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
[SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
theorem unitization_injective (h1 : (1 : A) ∉ s) : Function.Injective (unitization s) :=
AlgHomClass.unitization_injective s h1 (unitization s) fun _ ↦ by simp
/-- If a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` over a field does not contain `1`, then its unitization is
isomorphic to its `Algebra.adjoin`. -/
@[simps! apply_coe]
noncomputable def unitizationAlgEquiv (h1 : (1 : A) ∉ s) :
Unitization R s ≃ₐ[R] Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) :=
let algHom : Unitization R s →ₐ[R] Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) :=
((unitization s).codRestrict _
fun x ↦ (unitization_range s).le <| AlgHom.mem_range_self _ x)
AlgEquiv.ofBijective algHom <| by
refine ⟨?_, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
· have := AlgHomClass.unitization_injective s h1
((Subalgebra.val _).comp algHom) fun _ ↦ by simp [algHom]
rw [AlgHom.coe_comp] at this
exact this.of_comp
· obtain (⟨a, ha⟩ : (x : A) ∈ (unitization s).range) :=
(unitization_range s).ge x.property
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext ha⟩
end Field
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
/-! ## Subsemirings -/
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
variable {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [SetLike S R] [hSR : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] (s : S)
/-- The natural `ℕ`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subsemiring to
its `Subsemiring.closure`. -/
def unitization : Unitization ℕ s →ₐ[ℕ] R :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization (hSRA := AddSubmonoidClass.nsmulMemClass) s
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization ℕ s) : unitization s x = x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range :
(unitization s).range = subalgebraOfSubsemiring (.closure s) := by
have := AddSubmonoidClass.nsmulMemClass (S := S)
rw [unitization, NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization_range (hSRA := this), Algebra.adjoin_nat]
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
/-! ## Subrings -/
namespace NonUnitalSubring
variable {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [SetLike S R] [hSR : NonUnitalSubringClass S R] (s : S)
/-- The natural `ℤ`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subring to
its `Subring.closure`. -/
def unitization : Unitization ℤ s →ₐ[ℤ] R :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization (hSRA := AddSubgroupClass.zsmulMemClass) s
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization ℤ s) : unitization s x = x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range :
(unitization s).range = subalgebraOfSubring (.closure s) := by
have := AddSubgroupClass.zsmulMemClass (S := S)
rw [unitization, NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization_range (hSRA := this), Algebra.adjoin_int]
end NonUnitalSubring
/-! ## Star subalgebras -/
namespace Unitization
variable {R A C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [StarRing R] [StarRing A]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A] [StarModule R A]
variable [Semiring C] [StarRing C] [Algebra R C] [StarModule R C]
theorem starLift_range_le
{f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C} {S : StarSubalgebra R C} :
(starLift f).range ≤ S ↔ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f ≤ S.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact @h (f x) ⟨x, by simp⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x with
| _ r a => simpa using add_mem (algebraMap_mem S r) (h ⟨a, rfl⟩)
theorem starLift_range (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) :
(starLift f).range = StarAlgebra.adjoin R (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f : Set C) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ by
rw [starLift_range_le, StarAlgebra.adjoin_le_iff]
rfl
end Unitization
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
section Semiring
variable {R S A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R] [Semiring A] [StarRing A] [Algebra R A]
[StarModule R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
[StarMemClass S A] (s : S)
/-- The natural star `R`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital star subalgebra
to its `StarAlgebra.adjoin`. -/
def unitization : Unitization R s →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
Unitization.starLift <| NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype s
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization R s) : unitization s x = algebraMap R A x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range : (unitization s).range = StarAlgebra.adjoin R s := by
rw [unitization, Unitization.starLift_range]
simp only [NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_range, NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.coe_subtype,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
rfl
end Semiring
section Field
variable {R S A : Type*} [Field R] [StarRing R] [Ring A] [StarRing A] [Algebra R A]
[StarModule R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
[StarMemClass S A] (s : S)
theorem unitization_injective (h1 : (1 : A) ∉ s) : Function.Injective (unitization s) :=
AlgHomClass.unitization_injective s h1 (unitization s) fun _ ↦ by simp
/-- If a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` over a field does not contain `1`, then its unitization is
isomorphic to its `StarAlgebra.adjoin`. -/
@[simps! apply_coe]
noncomputable def unitizationStarAlgEquiv (h1 : (1 : A) ∉ s) :
Unitization R s ≃⋆ₐ[R] StarAlgebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) :=
let starAlgHom : Unitization R s →⋆ₐ[R] StarAlgebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) :=
((unitization s).codRestrict _
fun x ↦ (unitization_range s).le <| Set.mem_range_self x)
StarAlgEquiv.ofBijective starAlgHom <| by
refine ⟨?_, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
· have := AlgHomClass.unitization_injective s h1 ((StarSubalgebra.subtype _).comp starAlgHom)
fun _ ↦ by simp [starAlgHom]
rw [StarAlgHom.coe_comp] at this
exact this.of_comp
· obtain (⟨a, ha⟩ : (x : A) ∈ (unitization s).range) :=
(unitization_range s).ge x.property
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext ha⟩
end Field
end NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Unitization.lean | 288 | 291 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
/-!
# Equivalent conditions for DVR
In `IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE`, we show that the following are equivalent for a
noetherian local domain that is not a field `(R, m, k)`:
- `R` is a discrete valuation ring
- `R` is a valuation ring
- `R` is a dedekind domain
- `R` is integrally closed with a unique prime ideal
- `m` is principal
- `dimₖ m/m² = 1`
- Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain` for a version without `¬ IsField R`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
open scoped Multiplicative
open IsLocalRing Module
theorem exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal [IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
(h' : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal) (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n := by
by_cases h : IsField R
· let _ := h.toField
exact ⟨0, by simp [(eq_bot_or_eq_top I).resolve_left hI]⟩
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx : _ = Ideal.span _⟩ := h'
by_cases hI' : I = ⊤
· use 0; rw [pow_zero, hI', Ideal.one_eq_top]
have H : ∀ r : R, ¬IsUnit r ↔ x ∣ r := fun r =>
(SetLike.ext_iff.mp hx r).trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
have : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
apply Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField (maximalIdeal.isMaximal R) h
simp [hx]
have hx' := IsDiscreteValuationRing.irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal x this hx
have H' : ∀ r : R, r ≠ 0 → r ∈ nonunits R → ∃ n : ℕ, Associated (x ^ n) r := by
intro r hr₁ hr₂
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, rfl, hf₂⟩ := (WfDvdMonoid.not_unit_iff_exists_factors_eq r hr₁).mp hr₂
have : ∀ b ∈ f, Associated x b := by
intro b hb
exact Irreducible.associated_of_dvd hx' (hf₁ b hb) ((H b).mp (hf₁ b hb).1)
clear hr₁ hr₂ hf₁
induction' f using Multiset.induction with fa fs fh
· exact (hf₂ rfl).elim
rcases eq_or_ne fs ∅ with (rfl | hf')
· use 1
rw [pow_one, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.empty_eq_zero, Multiset.prod_zero, mul_one]
exact this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := fh hf' fun b hb => this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hb)
use n + 1
rw [pow_add, Multiset.prod_cons, mul_comm, pow_one]
exact Associated.mul_mul (this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)) hn
have : ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ : ∃ r : R, r ∈ I ∧ r ≠ 0 := by
by_contra! h; apply hI; rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact h
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' r hr₂ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hr₁)
use n
rwa [← I.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem u.isUnit, mul_comm]
use Nat.find this
apply le_antisymm
· change ∀ s ∈ I, s ∈ _
by_contra! hI''
obtain ⟨s, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := hI''
apply hs₂
by_cases hs₃ : s = 0; · rw [hs₃]; exact zero_mem _
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' s hs₃ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hs₁)
rw [mul_comm, Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem _ u.isUnit] at hs₁ ⊢
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.find_min' this hs₁)
apply Ideal.pow_mem_pow
exact (H _).mpr (dvd_refl _)
· rw [hx, Ideal.span_singleton_pow, Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact Nat.find_spec this
theorem maximalIdeal_isPrincipal_of_isDedekindDomain [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
[IsDedekindDomain R] : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal := by
classical
by_cases ne_bot : maximalIdeal R = ⊥
· rw [ne_bot]; infer_instance
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ : ∃ a ∈ maximalIdeal R, a ≠ (0 : R) := by
by_contra! h'; apply ne_bot; rwa [eq_bot_iff]
have hle : Ideal.span {a} ≤ maximalIdeal R := by rwa [Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
have : (Ideal.span {a}).radical = maximalIdeal R := by
rw [Ideal.radical_eq_sInf]
apply le_antisymm
· exact sInf_le ⟨hle, inferInstance⟩
· refine
le_sInf fun I hI =>
(eq_maximalIdeal <| hI.2.isMaximal (fun e => ha₂ ?_)).ge
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, eq_bot_iff, ← e]; exact hI.1
have : ∃ n, maximalIdeal R ^ n ≤ Ideal.span {a} := by
rw [← this]; apply Ideal.exists_radical_pow_le_of_fg; exact IsNoetherian.noetherian _
rcases hn : Nat.find this with - | n
· have := Nat.find_spec this
rw [hn, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top] at this
exact (Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top inferInstance (eq_top_iff.mpr <| this.trans hle)).elim
obtain ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ : ∃ b ∈ maximalIdeal R ^ n, ¬b ∈ Ideal.span {a} := by
by_contra! h'; rw [Nat.find_eq_iff] at hn; exact hn.2 n n.lt_succ_self fun x hx => h' x hx
have hb₃ : ∀ m ∈ maximalIdeal R, ∃ k : R, k * a = b * m := by
intro m hm; rw [← Ideal.mem_span_singleton']; apply Nat.find_spec this
rw [hn, pow_succ]; exact Ideal.mul_mem_mul hb₁ hm
have hb₄ : b ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; apply hb₂; exact zero_mem _
let K := FractionRing R
let x : K := algebraMap R K b / algebraMap R K a
let M := Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R K) (maximalIdeal R)
have ha₃ : algebraMap R K a ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.not.mpr ha₂
by_cases hx : ∀ y ∈ M, x * y ∈ M
· have := isIntegral_of_smul_mem_submodule M ?_ ?_ x hx
· obtain ⟨y, e⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.algebraMap_eq_of_integral this
refine (hb₂ (Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨y, ?_⟩)).elim
apply IsFractionRing.injective R K
rw [map_mul, e, div_mul_cancel₀ _ ha₃]
· rw [Submodule.ne_bot_iff]; refine ⟨_, ⟨a, ha₁, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact (IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff (K := K)).not.mpr ha₂
· apply Submodule.FG.map; exact IsNoetherian.noetherian _
· have :
(M.map (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R K x)).comap (Algebra.linearMap R K) = ⊤ := by
by_contra h; apply hx
rintro m' ⟨m, hm, rfl : algebraMap R K m = m'⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hb₃ m hm
have hk' : x * algebraMap R K m = algebraMap R K k := by
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, ← map_mul, ← hk, map_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ ha₃]
exact ⟨k, le_maximalIdeal h ⟨_, ⟨_, hm, rfl⟩, hk'⟩, hk'.symm⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ : ∃ y ∈ maximalIdeal R, b * y = a := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_comap] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hy' : x * algebraMap R K y = algebraMap R K 1⟩ := this
rw [map_one, ← mul_div_right_comm, div_eq_one_iff_eq ha₃, ← map_mul] at hy'
exact ⟨y, hy, IsFractionRing.injective R K hy'⟩
refine ⟨⟨y, ?_⟩⟩
apply le_antisymm
· intro m hm; obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hb₃ m hm; rw [← hy₂, mul_comm, mul_assoc] at hk
rw [← mul_left_cancel₀ hb₄ hk, mul_comm]; exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
· rwa [Submodule.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
/--
Let `(R, m, k)` be a noetherian local domain (possibly a field).
The following are equivalent:
0. `R` is a PID
1. `R` is a valuation ring
2. `R` is a dedekind domain
3. `R` is integrally closed with at most one non-zero prime ideal
4. `m` is principal
5. `dimₖ m/m² ≤ 1`
6. Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE` for a version assuming `¬ IsField R`.
-/
theorem tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain
[IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R] :
List.TFAE
[IsPrincipalIdealRing R, ValuationRing R, IsDedekindDomain R,
IsIntegrallyClosed R ∧ ∀ P : Ideal R, P ≠ ⊥ → P.IsPrime → P = maximalIdeal R,
(maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal,
finrank (ResidueField R) (CotangentSpace R) ≤ 1,
∀ I ≠ ⊥, ∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := fun _ ↦ inferInstance
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun _ ↦ ((IsBezout.TFAE (R := R)).out 0 1).mp ‹_›
tfae_have 1 → 4
| H => ⟨inferInstance, fun P hP hP' ↦ eq_maximalIdeal (hP'.isMaximal hP)⟩
tfae_have 4 → 3 :=
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ { h₁ with maximalOfPrime := (h₂ _ · · ▸ maximalIdeal.isMaximal R) }
tfae_have 3 → 5 := fun h ↦ maximalIdeal_isPrincipal_of_isDedekindDomain R
tfae_have 6 ↔ 5 := finrank_cotangentSpace_le_one_iff
tfae_have 5 → 7 := exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal R
tfae_have 7 → 2 := by
rw [ValuationRing.iff_ideal_total]
intro H
constructor
intro I J
by_cases hI : I = ⊥; · subst hI; left; exact bot_le
by_cases hJ : J = ⊥; · subst hJ; right; exact bot_le
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := H I hI
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := H J hJ
exact (le_total m n).imp Ideal.pow_le_pow_right Ideal.pow_le_pow_right
tfae_finish
/--
The following are equivalent for a
noetherian local domain that is not a field `(R, m, k)`:
0. `R` is a discrete valuation ring
1. `R` is a valuation ring
2. `R` is a dedekind domain
3. `R` is integrally closed with a unique non-zero prime ideal
4. `m` is principal
5. `dimₖ m/m² = 1`
6. Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain` for a version without `¬ IsField R`.
-/
theorem IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE [IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
(h : ¬IsField R) :
List.TFAE
[IsDiscreteValuationRing R, ValuationRing R, IsDedekindDomain R,
IsIntegrallyClosed R ∧ ∃! P : Ideal R, P ≠ ⊥ ∧ P.IsPrime, (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal,
finrank (ResidueField R) (CotangentSpace R) = 1,
∀ (I) (_ : I ≠ ⊥), ∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n] := by
have : finrank (ResidueField R) (CotangentSpace R) = 1 ↔
finrank (ResidueField R) (CotangentSpace R) ≤ 1 := by
simp [Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one, finrank_cotangentSpace_eq_zero_iff, h]
rw [this]
have : maximalIdeal R ≠ ⊥ := isField_iff_maximalIdeal_eq.not.mp h
convert tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_isLocalRing_of_isDomain R
· exact ⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun h ↦ { h with not_a_field' := this }⟩
· exact ⟨fun h P h₁ h₂ ↦ h.unique ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ⟨this, inferInstance⟩,
| fun H ↦ ⟨_, ⟨this, inferInstance⟩, fun P hP ↦ H P hP.1 hP.2⟩⟩
variable {R}
lemma IsLocalRing.finrank_CotangentSpace_eq_one_iff [IsNoetherianRing R] [IsLocalRing R]
[IsDomain R] : finrank (ResidueField R) (CotangentSpace R) = 1 ↔ IsDiscreteValuationRing R := by
by_cases hR : IsField R
· letI := hR.toField
simp only [finrank_cotangentSpace_eq_zero, zero_ne_one, false_iff]
exact fun h ↦ h.3 maximalIdeal_eq_bot
· exact (IsDiscreteValuationRing.TFAE R hR).out 5 0
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-09")]
alias LocalRing.finrank_CotangentSpace_eq_one_iff := IsLocalRing.finrank_CotangentSpace_eq_one_iff
variable (R)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DiscreteValuationRing/TFAE.lean | 220 | 235 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Kevin Klinge, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.DistribMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
/-!
# Localization over left Ore sets.
This file proves results on the localization of rings (monoids with zeros) over a left Ore set.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Ore+localization>
* [Zoran Škoda, *Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry*][skoda2006]
## Tags
localization, Ore, non-commutative
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u
open OreLocalization
namespace OreLocalization
section MonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv' (s : S) : (0 : R) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp [Submonoid.smul_def]⟩
instance : MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
zero_mul x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_mul_char 0 r 1 s 0 1 (by simp), zero_mul, one_mul]
mul_zero x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, mul_div_one, mul_zero, zero_oreDiv', zero_oreDiv']
end MonoidWithZero
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
instance : CommMonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid R[S⁻¹])
end CommMonoidWithZero
section DistribMulAction
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S] {X : Type*} [AddMonoid X]
variable [DistribMulAction R X]
private def add'' (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] :=
(oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₁ + oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₂) /ₒ (oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ * s₁)
private theorem add''_char (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(hb : sb * s₁ = rb * s₂) (h : sb * s₁ ∈ S) :
add'' r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = (sb • r₁ + rb • r₂) /ₒ ⟨sb * s₁, h⟩ := by
simp only [add'']
have ha := ore_eq (s₁ : R) s₂
generalize oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ = ra at *
generalize oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ = sa at *
rw [oreDiv_eq_iff]
rcases oreCondition sb sa with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
have : sc * rb * s₂ = rc * ra * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc rc, ← ha, ← mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hb]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ s₂ this with ⟨sd, hd⟩
use sd * sc
use sd * rc
simp only [smul_add, smul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul]
constructor
· rw [mul_assoc _ _ rb, hd, mul_assoc, hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (sc : R), hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
attribute [local instance] OreLocalization.oreEqv
private def add' (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
(--plus tilde
Quotient.lift
fun r₁s₁ : X × S => add'' r₁s₁.1 r₁s₁.2 r₂ s₂) <| by
-- Porting note: `assoc_rw` & `noncomm_ring` were not ported yet
rintro ⟨r₁', s₁'⟩ ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
-- s*, r*
rcases oreCondition (s₁' : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
--s~~, r~~
rcases oreCondition rb sc with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
-- s#, r#
dsimp at *
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₁').2]
have : sd * sb * s₁ = rd * rc * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc, hb', ← mul_assoc, hd, mul_assoc, hc, ← mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ (rd * rc : R) (sd * sb) this (sd * sb * s₁).2]
rw [mul_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def sb, hb, smul_smul, hd, oreDiv_eq_iff]
use 1
use rd
simp only [mul_smul, smul_add, one_smul, OneMemClass.coe_one, one_mul, true_and]
rw [this, hc, mul_assoc]
/-- The addition on the Ore localization. -/
@[irreducible]
private def add : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := fun x =>
Quotient.lift (fun rs : X × S => add' rs.1 rs.2 x)
(by
rintro ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
induction' x with r₃ s₃
show add'' _ _ _ _ = add'' _ _ _ _
dsimp only at *
rcases oreCondition (s₃ : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
rcases oreCondition rc sb with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
have : rd * rb * s₁ = sd * sc * s₃ := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← hb', ← mul_assoc, ← hd, mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₃).2]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ _ _ this.symm (sd * sc * s₃).2]
refine oreDiv_eq_iff.mpr ?_
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, smul_add]
use sd, 1
simp only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_smul, ← hb, Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_assoc, and_true]
simp only [smul_smul, hd])
instance : Add X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨add⟩
theorem oreDiv_add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s s' : S} :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' =
(oreDenom (s : R) s' • r + oreNum (s : R) s' • r') /ₒ (oreDenom (s : R) s' * s) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
theorem oreDiv_add_char' {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(h : sb * s = rb * s') (h' : sb * s ∈ S) :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ ⟨sb * s, h'⟩ := by
with_unfolding_all exact add''_char r s r' s' rb sb h h'
/-- A characterization of the addition on the Ore localizaion, allowing for arbitrary Ore
numerator and Ore denominator. -/
theorem oreDiv_add_char {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : S) (h : sb * s = rb * s') :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ (sb * s) :=
oreDiv_add_char' s s' rb sb h (sb * s).2
/-- Another characterization of the addition on the Ore localization, bundling up all witnesses
and conditions into a sigma type. -/
def oreDivAddChar' (r r' : X) (s s' : S) :
Σ'r'' : R,
Σ's'' : S, s'' * s = r'' * s' ∧ r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (s'' • r + r'' • r') /ₒ (s'' * s) :=
⟨oreNum (s : R) s', oreDenom (s : R) s', ore_eq (s : R) s', oreDiv_add_oreDiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s : S} : r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s = (r + r') /ₒ s := by
simp [oreDiv_add_char s s 1 1 (by simp)]
protected theorem add_assoc (x y z : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'
rcases oreDivAddChar' (sa • r₁ + ra • r₂) r₃ (sa * s₁) s₃ with ⟨rc, sc, hc, q⟩; rw [q]; clear q
simp only [smul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
simp_rw [← add_oreDiv, ← OreLocalization.expand']
congr 2
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (ha.symm ▸ (sa * s₁).2)]; congr; ext; exact ha
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₃ s₃ rc (hc.symm ▸ (sc * (sa * s₁)).2)]; congr; ext; exact hc
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv (s : S) : (0 : X) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp⟩
protected theorem zero_add (x : X[S⁻¹]) : 0 + x = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
protected theorem add_zero (x : X[S⁻¹]) : x + 0 = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
@[irreducible]
private def nsmul : ℕ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := nsmulRec
instance : AddMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_assoc := OreLocalization.add_assoc
zero_add := OreLocalization.zero_add
add_zero := OreLocalization.add_zero
nsmul := nsmul
nsmul_zero _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
nsmul_succ _ _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem smul_zero (x : R[S⁻¹]) : x • (0 : X[S⁻¹]) = 0 := by
induction' x with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, smul_div_one, smul_zero, zero_oreDiv, zero_oreDiv]
protected theorem smul_add (z : R[S⁻¹]) (x y : X[S⁻¹]) :
z • (x + y) = z • x + z • y := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'; norm_cast at ha
rw [OreLocalization.expand' r₁ s₁ sa]
rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (by rw [← ha]; apply SetLike.coe_mem)]
rw [← Subtype.coe_eq_of_eq_mk ha]
repeat rw [oreDiv_smul_oreDiv]
simp only [smul_add, add_oreDiv]
instance : DistribMulAction R[S⁻¹] X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero := OreLocalization.smul_zero
smul_add := OreLocalization.smul_add
instance {R₀} [Monoid R₀] [MulAction R₀ X] [MulAction R₀ R]
[IsScalarTower R₀ R X] [IsScalarTower R₀ R R] :
DistribMulAction R₀ X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero _ := by rw [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_zero]
smul_add _ _ _ := by simp only [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_add]
end DistribMulAction
section AddCommMonoid
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommMonoid X] [DistribMulAction R X]
protected theorem add_comm (x y : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y = y + x := by
induction' x with r s
induction' y with r' s'
rcases oreDivAddChar' r r' s s' with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩
rw [ha', oreDiv_add_char' s' s _ _ ha.symm (ha ▸ (sa * s).2), add_comm]
congr; ext; exact ha
instance instAddCommMonoidOreLocalization : AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_comm := OreLocalization.add_comm
end AddCommMonoid
section AddGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
/-- Negation on the Ore localization is defined via negation on the numerator. -/
@[irreducible]
protected def neg : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
liftExpand (fun (r : X) (s : S) => -r /ₒ s) fun r t s ht => by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
beta_reduce
rw [← smul_neg, ← OreLocalization.expand]
instance instNegOreLocalization : Neg X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨OreLocalization.neg⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem neg_def (r : X) (s : S) : -(r /ₒ s) = -r /ₒ s := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem neg_add_cancel (x : X[S⁻¹]) : -x + x = 0 := by
induction' x with r s; simp
/-- `zsmul` of `OreLocalization` -/
@[irreducible]
protected def zsmul : ℤ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := zsmulRec
unseal OreLocalization.zsmul in
instance instAddGroupOreLocalization : AddGroup X[S⁻¹] where
neg_add_cancel := OreLocalization.neg_add_cancel
zsmul := OreLocalization.zsmul
end AddGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
instance : AddCommGroup X[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddGroup X[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹])
end AddCommGroup
end OreLocalization
| Mathlib/RingTheory/OreLocalization/Basic.lean | 464 | 466 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Nonnegative rationals
This file defines the nonnegative rationals as a subtype of `Rat` and provides its basic algebraic
order structure.
Note that `NNRat` is not declared as a `Semifield` here. See `Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat` for that
instance.
We also define an instance `CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0`. This instance can be used by the `lift` tactic to
replace `x : ℚ` and `hx : 0 ≤ x` in the proof context with `x : ℚ≥0` while replacing all occurrences
of `x` with `↑x`. This tactic also works for a function `f : α → ℚ` with a hypothesis
`hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x`.
## Notation
`ℚ≥0` is notation for `NNRat` in locale `NNRat`.
## Huge warning
Whenever you state a lemma about the coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ`, check that Lean inserts `NNRat.cast`, not
`Subtype.val`. Else your lemma will never apply.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice OrderedCommMonoid
library_note "specialised high priority simp lemma" /--
It sometimes happens that a `@[simp]` lemma declared early in the library can be proved by `simp`
using later, more general simp lemmas. In that case, the following reasons might be arguments for
the early lemma to be tagged `@[simp high]` (rather than `@[simp, nolint simpNF]` or
un``@[simp]``ed):
1. There is a significant portion of the library which needs the early lemma to be available via
`simp` and which doesn't have access to the more general lemmas.
2. The more general lemmas have more complicated typeclass assumptions, causing rewrites with them
to be slower.
-/
open Function
instance Rat.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℚ where
zero_le_one := rfl
instance Rat.instPosMulMono : PosMulMono ℚ where
elim := fun r p q h => by
simp only [mul_comm]
simpa [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using Rat.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 h) r.2
deriving instance CommSemiring for NNRat
deriving instance LinearOrder for NNRat
deriving instance Sub for NNRat
deriving instance Inhabited for NNRat
namespace NNRat
variable {p q : ℚ≥0}
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℚ≥0 where exists_pair_ne := ⟨1, 0, by decide⟩
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot ℚ≥0 where
bot := 0
bot_le q := q.2
@[simp] lemma val_eq_cast (q : ℚ≥0) : q.1 = q := rfl
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℚ≥0 where
cast_injective a b hab := by simpa using congr_arg num hab
instance canLift : CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0 (↑) fun q ↦ 0 ≤ q where
prf q hq := ⟨⟨q, hq⟩, rfl⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext : (p : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) → p = q :=
Subtype.ext
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (p : ℚ) = q ↔ p = q :=
Subtype.coe_inj
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℚ≥0} : (x : ℚ) ≠ (y : ℚ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
NNRat.coe_inj.not
-- TODO: We have to write `NNRat.cast` explicitly, else the statement picks up `Subtype.val` instead
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (q : ℚ) (hq) : NNRat.cast ⟨q, hq⟩ = q := rfl
lemma «forall» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∀ q, p q) ↔ ∀ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.forall
lemma «exists» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∃ q, p q) ↔ ∃ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.exists
/-- Reinterpret a rational number `q` as a non-negative rational number. Returns `0` if `q ≤ 0`. -/
def _root_.Rat.toNNRat (q : ℚ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨max q 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
theorem _root_.Rat.coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) : (q.toNNRat : ℚ) = q :=
max_eq_left hq
theorem _root_.Rat.le_coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) : q ≤ q.toNNRat :=
le_max_left _ _
open Rat (toNNRat)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nonneg (q : ℚ≥0) : (0 : ℚ) ≤ q :=
q.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : num 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_zero : den 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_one : num 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_one : den 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p + q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p * q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p * q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (↑(q ^ n) : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma num_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).num = q.num ^ n := by simp [num, Int.natAbs_pow]
@[simp] lemma den_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).den = q.den ^ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (h : q ≤ p) : ((p - q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p - q :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by rwa [sub_zero]
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem coe_eq_zero : (q : ℚ) = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by norm_cast
theorem coe_ne_zero : (q : ℚ) ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 :=
coe_eq_zero.not
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe : (p : ℚ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe : (p : ℚ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos : (0 : ℚ) < q ↔ 0 < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem coe_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
fun _ _ ↦ coe_le_coe.2
theorem toNNRat_mono : Monotone toNNRat :=
fun _ _ h ↦ max_le_max h le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : toNNRat q = q :=
ext <| max_eq_left q.2
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : toNNRat n = n :=
ext <| by simp only [Nat.cast_nonneg', Rat.coe_toNNRat]; rfl
/-- `toNNRat` and `(↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ` form a Galois insertion. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion toNNRat (↑) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro coe_mono toNNRat_mono Rat.le_coe_toNNRat toNNRat_coe
/-- Coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ` as a `RingHom`. -/
def coeHom : ℚ≥0 →+* ℚ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' := coe_mul
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(↑n : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_natCast (n : ℕ) : @Eq ℚ≥0 (⟨(n : ℚ), Nat.cast_nonneg' n⟩ : ℚ≥0) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : ⇑coeHom = ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem nsmul_coe (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ↑(n • q) = n • (q : ℚ) :=
coeHom.toAddMonoidHom.map_nsmul _ _
theorem bddAbove_coe {s : Set ℚ≥0} : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set ℚ) ↔ BddAbove s :=
⟨fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦
⟨toNNRat b, fun ⟨y, _⟩ hys ↦
show y ≤ max b 0 from (hb <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hys).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, fun _ ⟨_, hx, Eq⟩ ↦ Eq ▸ hb hx⟩⟩
theorem bddBelow_coe (s : Set ℚ≥0) : BddBelow (((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) '' s) :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨q, _, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ q.2⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((max x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = max (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_max
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((min x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = min (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_min
theorem sub_def (p q : ℚ≥0) : p - q = toNNRat (p - q) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem abs_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : |(q : ℚ)| = q :=
abs_of_nonneg q.2
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero (q : ℚ≥0) : q ≤ 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
⟨fun h => le_antisymm h q.2, fun h => h.symm ▸ q.2⟩
end NNRat
open NNRat
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_zero : toNNRat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_one : toNNRat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_pos : 0 < toNNRat q ↔ 0 < q := by simp [toNNRat, ← coe_lt_coe]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_eq_zero : toNNRat q = 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by
simpa [-toNNRat_pos] using (@toNNRat_pos q).not
alias ⟨_, toNNRat_of_nonpos⟩ := toNNRat_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_le_toNNRat_iff (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ q ≤ p := by
simp [← coe_le_coe, toNNRat, hp]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff' : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p ∧ 0 < p := by
simp [← coe_lt_coe, toNNRat, lt_irrefl]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff (h : 0 < p) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans (and_iff_left h)
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff_of_nonneg (hq : 0 ≤ q) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans ⟨And.left, fun h ↦ ⟨h, hq.trans_lt h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_add (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat (q + p) = toNNRat q + toNNRat p :=
NNRat.ext <| by simp [toNNRat, hq, hp, add_nonneg]
theorem toNNRat_add_le : toNNRat (q + p) ≤ toNNRat q + toNNRat p :=
coe_le_coe.1 <| max_le (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)) <| coe_nonneg _
theorem toNNRat_le_iff_le_coe {p : ℚ≥0} : toNNRat q ≤ p ↔ q ≤ ↑p :=
NNRat.gi.gc q p
theorem le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le {q : ℚ≥0} (hp : 0 ≤ p) : q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ ↑q ≤ p := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, Rat.coe_toNNRat p hp]
theorem le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le' {q : ℚ≥0} (hq : 0 < q) : q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ ↑q ≤ p :=
(le_or_lt 0 p).elim le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le fun hp ↦ by
simp only [(hp.trans_le q.coe_nonneg).not_le, toNNRat_eq_zero.2 hp.le, hq.not_le]
theorem toNNRat_lt_iff_lt_coe {p : ℚ≥0} (hq : 0 ≤ q) : toNNRat q < p ↔ q < ↑p := by
rw [← coe_lt_coe, Rat.coe_toNNRat q hq]
theorem lt_toNNRat_iff_coe_lt {q : ℚ≥0} : q < toNNRat p ↔ ↑q < p :=
NNRat.gi.gc.lt_iff_lt
theorem toNNRat_mul (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat (p * q) = toNNRat p * toNNRat q := by
rcases le_total 0 q with hq | hq
· ext; simp [toNNRat, hp, hq, max_eq_left, mul_nonneg]
· have hpq := mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos hp hq
rw [toNNRat_eq_zero.2 hq, toNNRat_eq_zero.2 hpq, mul_zero]
end Rat
/-- The absolute value on `ℚ` as a map to `ℚ≥0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def Rat.nnabs (x : ℚ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨abs x, abs_nonneg x⟩
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem Rat.coe_nnabs (x : ℚ) : (Rat.nnabs x : ℚ) = abs x := rfl
/-! ### Numerator and denominator -/
namespace NNRat
variable {p q : ℚ≥0}
@[norm_cast] lemma num_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℚ).num = q.num := by
simp only [num, Int.natCast_natAbs, Rat.num_nonneg, coe_nonneg, abs_of_nonneg]
theorem natAbs_num_coe : (q : ℚ).num.natAbs = q.num := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma den_coe : (q : ℚ).den = q.den := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_ne_zero : q.num ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 := by simp [num]
@[simp] lemma num_pos : 0 < q.num ↔ 0 < q := by
simpa [num, -nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using nonpos_iff_eq_zero _ |>.not.symm
@[simp] lemma den_pos (q : ℚ≥0) : 0 < q.den := Rat.den_pos _
@[simp] lemma den_ne_zero (q : ℚ≥0) : q.den ≠ 0 := Rat.den_ne_zero _
lemma coprime_num_den (q : ℚ≥0) : q.num.Coprime q.den := by simpa [num, den] using Rat.reduced _
-- TODO: Rename `Rat.coe_nat_num`, `Rat.intCast_den`, `Rat.ofNat_num`, `Rat.ofNat_den`
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma num_natCast (n : ℕ) : num n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma den_natCast (n : ℕ) : den n = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : num ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma den_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : den ofNat(n) = 1 := rfl
theorem ext_num_den (hn : p.num = q.num) (hd : p.den = q.den) : p = q := by
refine ext <| Rat.ext ?_ hd
simpa [num_coe]
theorem ext_num_den_iff : p = q ↔ p.num = q.num ∧ p.den = q.den :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun h ↦ ext_num_den h.1 h.2⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n d : ℕ`.
See also `Rat.divInt` and `mkRat`. -/
def divNat (n d : ℕ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨.divInt n d, Rat.divInt_nonneg (Int.ofNat_zero_le n) (Int.ofNat_zero_le d)⟩
variable {n₁ n₂ d₁ d₂ : ℕ}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_divNat (n d : ℕ) : (divNat n d : ℚ) = .divInt n d := rfl
lemma mk_divInt (n d : ℕ) :
⟨.divInt n d, Rat.divInt_nonneg (Int.ofNat_zero_le n) (Int.ofNat_zero_le d)⟩ = divNat n d := rfl
lemma divNat_inj (h₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (h₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) : divNat n₁ d₁ = divNat n₂ d₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
rw [← coe_inj]; simp [Rat.mkRat_eq_iff, h₁, h₂]; norm_cast
@[simp] lemma divNat_zero (n : ℕ) : divNat n 0 = 0 := by simp [divNat]; rfl
@[simp] lemma num_divNat_den (q : ℚ≥0) : divNat q.num q.den = q :=
| ext <| by rw [← (q : ℚ).mkRat_num_den']; simp [num_coe, den_coe]
| Mathlib/Data/NNRat/Defs.lean | 366 | 366 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ThickenedIndicator
/-!
# Spaces where indicators of closed sets have decreasing approximations by continuous functions
In this file we define a typeclass `HasOuterApproxClosed` for topological spaces in which indicator
functions of closed sets have sequences of bounded continuous functions approximating them from
above. All pseudo-emetrizable spaces have this property, see `instHasOuterApproxClosed`.
In spaces with the `HasOuterApproxClosed` property, finite Borel measures are uniquely characterized
by the integrals of bounded continuous functions. Also weak convergence of finite measures and
convergence in distribution for random variables behave somewhat well in spaces with this property.
## Main definitions
* `HasOuterApproxClosed`: the typeclass for topological spaces in which indicator functions of
closed sets have sequences of bounded continuous functions approximating them.
* `IsClosed.apprSeq`: a (non-constructive) choice of an approximating sequence to the indicator
function of a closed set.
## Main results
* `instHasOuterApproxClosed`: Any pseudo-emetrizable space has the property `HasOuterApproxClosed`.
* `tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq`: The integrals of the approximating functions to the indicator of a
closed set tend to the measure of the set.
* `ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq_of_IsFiniteMeasure`: Two finite measures are equal if the integrals
of all bounded continuous functions with respect to both agree.
-/
open BoundedContinuousFunction MeasureTheory Topology Metric Filter Set ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
section auxiliary
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- A bounded convergence theorem for a finite measure:
If bounded continuous non-negative functions are uniformly bounded by a constant and tend to a
limit, then their integrals against the finite measure tend to the integral of the limit.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere;
* integration is `MeasureTheory.lintegral`, i.e., the functions and their integrals are
`ℝ≥0∞`-valued.
-/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} [L.IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {fs : ι → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(fs_le_const : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂μ, fs i ω ≤ c) {f : Ω → ℝ≥0}
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ fs i ω) L (𝓝 (f ω))) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ ω, fs i ω ∂μ) L (𝓝 (∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (fun _ ↦ c)
(Eventually.of_forall fun i ↦ (ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp (fs i).continuous).measurable) ?_
(@lintegral_const_lt_top _ _ μ _ _ (@ENNReal.coe_ne_top c)).ne ?_
· simpa only [Function.comp_apply, ENNReal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_const
· simpa only [Function.comp_apply, ENNReal.tendsto_coe] using fs_lim
/-- If bounded continuous functions tend to the indicator of a measurable set and are
uniformly bounded, then their integrals against a finite measure tend to the measure of the set.
This formulation assumes:
* the functions tend to a limit along a countably generated filter;
* the limit is in the almost everywhere sense;
* boundedness holds almost everywhere.
-/
theorem measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_filter_indicator {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[L.IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure Ω)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0} {E : Set Ω} (E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (fs : ι → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)
(fs_bdd : ∀ᶠ i in L, ∀ᵐ ω : Ω ∂μ, fs i ω ≤ c)
(fs_lim : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ fs i ω) L (𝓝 (indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)) ω))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ lintegral μ fun ω ↦ fs n ω) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
convert tendsto_lintegral_nn_filter_of_le_const μ fs_bdd fs_lim
have aux : ∀ ω, indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) ω = ↑(indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)) ω) :=
fun ω ↦ by simp only [ENNReal.coe_indicator, ENNReal.coe_one]
simp_rw [← aux, lintegral_indicator E_mble]
simp only [lintegral_one, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
/-- If a sequence of bounded continuous functions tends to the indicator of a measurable set and
the functions are uniformly bounded, then their integrals against a finite measure tend to the
measure of the set.
A similar result with more general assumptions is
`MeasureTheory.measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_filter_indicator`.
-/
theorem measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_indicator
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0} {E : Set Ω} (E_mble : MeasurableSet E)
| (fs : ℕ → Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) (fs_bdd : ∀ n ω, fs n ω ≤ c)
(fs_lim : Tendsto (fun n ω ↦ fs n ω) atTop (𝓝 (indicator E fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ lintegral μ fun ω ↦ fs n ω) atTop (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have fs_lim' :
∀ ω, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (fs n ω : ℝ≥0)) atTop (𝓝 (indicator E (fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ≥0)) ω)) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at fs_lim
exact fun ω ↦ fs_lim ω
apply measure_of_cont_bdd_of_tendsto_filter_indicator μ E_mble fs
(Eventually.of_forall fun n ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fs_bdd n)) (Eventually.of_forall fs_lim')
/-- The integrals of thickened indicators of a closed set against a finite measure tend to the
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/HasOuterApproxClosed.lean | 95 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Properties of morphisms
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms.
The following meta-property is defined
* `RespectsLeft P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the left if `P f → P (i ≫ f)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `RespectsRight P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the right if `P f → P (f ≫ i)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `Respects`: `P` respects `Q` if `P` respects `Q` both on the left and on the right.
-/
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
/-- A `MorphismProperty C` is a class of morphisms between objects in `C`. -/
def MorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop
instance : CompleteBooleanAlgebra (MorphismProperty C) where
le P₁ P₂ := ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), P₁ f → P₂ f
__ := inferInstanceAs (CompleteBooleanAlgebra (∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop))
lemma MorphismProperty.le_def {P Q : MorphismProperty C} :
P ≤ Q ↔ ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), P f → Q f := Iff.rfl
instance : Inhabited (MorphismProperty C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
lemma MorphismProperty.top_eq : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) = fun _ _ _ => True := rfl
variable {C}
namespace MorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext (W W' : MorphismProperty C) (h : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), W f ↔ W' f) :
W = W' := by
funext X Y f
rw [h]
@[simp]
lemma top_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) f := by
simp only [top_eq]
lemma of_eq_top {P : MorphismProperty C} (h : P = ⊤) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : P f := by
simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_iff (S : Set (MorphismProperty C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
sSup S f ↔ ∃ (W : S), W.1 f := by
dsimp [sSup, iSup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma iSup_iff {ι : Sort*} (W : ι → MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
iSup W f ↔ ∃ i, W i f := by
apply (sSup_iff (Set.range W) f).trans
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨i, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
/-- The morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` associated to a morphism property in `C` -/
@[simp]
def op (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ := fun _ _ f => P f.unop
/-- The morphism property in `C` associated to a morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` -/
@[simp]
def unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => P f.op
theorem unop_op (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.op.unop = P :=
rfl
theorem op_unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : P.unop.op = P :=
rfl
/-- The inverse image of a `MorphismProperty D` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def inverseImage (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
P (F.map f)
@[simp]
lemma inverseImage_iff (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.inverseImage F f ↔ P (F.map f) := by rfl
/-- The image (up to isomorphisms) of a `MorphismProperty C` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty D := fun _ _ f =>
∃ (X' Y' : C) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk (F.map f') ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma map_mem_map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
(P.map F) (F.map f) := ⟨X, Y, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_map (F : C ⥤ D) :
Monotone (map · F) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
section
variable (P : MorphismProperty C)
/-- The set in `Set (Arrow C)` which corresponds to `P : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def toSet : Set (Arrow C) := setOf (fun f ↦ P f.hom)
/-- The family of morphisms indexed by `P.toSet` which corresponds
to `P : MorphismProperty C`, see `MorphismProperty.ofHoms_homFamily`. -/
def homFamily (f : P.toSet) : f.1.left ⟶ f.1.right := f.1.hom
lemma homFamily_apply (f : P.toSet) : P.homFamily f = f.1.hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homFamily_arrow_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
P.homFamily ⟨Arrow.mk f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow.mk f ∈ P.toSet ↔ P f := Iff.rfl
lemma of_eq {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : P f)
{X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
(hX : X = X') (hY : Y = Y') (h : f' = eqToHom hX.symm ≫ f ≫ eqToHom hY) :
P f' := by
rw [← P.arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff] at hf ⊢
rwa [(Arrow.mk_eq_mk_iff f' f).2 ⟨hX.symm, hY.symm, h⟩]
end
/-- The class of morphisms given by a family of morphisms `f i : X i ⟶ Y i`. -/
inductive ofHoms {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) : MorphismProperty C
| mk (i : ι) : ofHoms f (f i)
lemma ofHoms_iff {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) {A B : C} (g : A ⟶ B) :
ofHoms f g ↔ ∃ i, Arrow.mk g = Arrow.mk (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, h⟩
rw [← (ofHoms f).arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff, h, arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff]
constructor
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_homFamily (P : MorphismProperty C) : ofHoms P.homFamily = P := by
ext _ _ f
constructor
· intro hf
rw [ofHoms_iff] at hf
obtain ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ := hf
exact hf
· intro hf
exact ⟨(⟨f, hf⟩ : P.toSet)⟩
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.RespectsRight Q` if it is stable under post-composition
with morphisms satisfying `Q`, i.e. whenever `P` holds for `f` and `Q` holds for `i` then `P`
holds for `f ≫ i`. -/
class RespectsRight (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop where
postcomp {X Y Z : C} (i : Y ⟶ Z) (hi : Q i) (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) : P (f ≫ i)
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.RespectsLeft Q` if it is stable under
pre-composition with morphisms satisfying `Q`, i.e. whenever `P` holds for `f`
and `Q` holds for `i` then `P` holds for `i ≫ f`. -/
class RespectsLeft (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop where
precomp {X Y Z : C} (i : X ⟶ Y) (hi : Q i) (f : Y ⟶ Z) (hf : P f) : P (i ≫ f)
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.Respects Q` if it is stable under composition on the
left and right by morphisms satisfying `Q`. -/
class Respects (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop extends P.RespectsLeft Q, P.RespectsRight Q where
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsLeft Q] [P.RespectsRight Q] : P.Respects Q where
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsLeft Q] : P.op.RespectsRight Q.op where
postcomp i hi f hf := RespectsLeft.precomp (Q := Q) i.unop hi f.unop hf
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsRight Q] : P.op.RespectsLeft Q.op where
precomp i hi f hf := RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := Q) i.unop hi f.unop hf
instance RespectsLeft.inf (P₁ P₂ Q : MorphismProperty C) [P₁.RespectsLeft Q]
[P₂.RespectsLeft Q] : (P₁ ⊓ P₂).RespectsLeft Q where
precomp i hi f hf := ⟨precomp i hi f hf.left, precomp i hi f hf.right⟩
instance RespectsRight.inf (P₁ P₂ Q : MorphismProperty C) [P₁.RespectsRight Q]
[P₂.RespectsRight Q] : (P₁ ⊓ P₂).RespectsRight Q where
postcomp i hi f hf := ⟨postcomp i hi f hf.left, postcomp i hi f hf.right⟩
variable (C)
|
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by isomorphisms in `C`. -/
def isomorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => IsIso f
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by monomorphisms in `C`. -/
def monomorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => Mono f
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by epimorphisms in `C`. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Basic.lean | 207 | 214 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
/-!
# Results about division in extended non-negative reals
This file establishes basic properties related to the inversion and division operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
For instance, as a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation
with integer exponent.
## Main results
A few order isomorphisms are worthy of mention:
- `OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ`: The map `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an order isomorphism to the dual.
- `orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`: The birational order isomorphism between
`ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` given by `x ↦ (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹` with inverse
`x ↦ (x⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹`
- `orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a`: Order isomorphism between an initial
interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0` given by the identity map.
- `orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`: An order isomorphism between
the extended nonnegative real numbers and the unit interval. This is `orderIsoIicOneBirational`
composed with the identity order isomorphism between `Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` and `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by
simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hr, coe_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ h0
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b * b⁻¹ = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b⁻¹ * b = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b / b = a := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' hb₀ hb
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b / b = a :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' ha₀ ha
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' ha₀ ha]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
protected alias ⟨_, Finiteness.inv_ne_top⟩ := ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1.lt_top (inv_ne_top.mpr h2).lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
protected theorem inv_mul_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ 0) (h2 : x ≠ ∞) :
x⁻¹ * y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ x * z := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_left h1 h2, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h1 h2, one_mul]
protected theorem mul_inv_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x * y⁻¹ ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.inv_mul_le_iff h1 h2, mul_comm]
protected theorem div_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem div_le_iff' {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ y * z := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
protected theorem inv_div {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (htop : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) (hzero : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ 0) :
(a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_zero] at htop
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_top] at hzero
| rw [ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.mul_inv htop hzero, mul_comm, inv_inv]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 246 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
|
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 817 | 818 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Utensil Song
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.RingQuot
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Isometry
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
/-!
# Clifford Algebras
We construct the Clifford algebra of a module `M` over a commutative ring `R`, equipped with
a quadratic form `Q`.
## Notation
The Clifford algebra of the `R`-module `M` equipped with a quadratic form `Q` is
an `R`-algebra denoted `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
Given a linear morphism `f : M → A` from a module `M` to another `R`-algebra `A`, such that
`cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)`, there is a (unique) lift of `f` to an `R`-algebra
morphism from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A`, which is denoted `CliffordAlgebra.lift Q f cond`.
The canonical linear map `M → CliffordAlgebra Q` is denoted `CliffordAlgebra.ι Q`.
## Theorems
The main theorems proved ensure that `CliffordAlgebra Q` satisfies the universal property
of the Clifford algebra.
1. `ι_comp_lift` is the fact that the composition of `ι Q` with `lift Q f cond` agrees with `f`.
2. `lift_unique` ensures the uniqueness of `lift Q f cond` with respect to 1.
## Implementation details
The Clifford algebra of `M` is constructed as a quotient of the tensor algebra, as follows.
1. We define a relation `CliffordAlgebra.Rel Q` on `TensorAlgebra R M`.
This is the smallest relation which identifies squares of elements of `M` with `Q m`.
2. The Clifford algebra is the quotient of the tensor algebra by this relation.
This file is almost identical to `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/ExteriorAlgebra/Basic.lean`.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
open TensorAlgebra
/-- `Rel` relates each `ι m * ι m`, for `m : M`, with `Q m`.
The Clifford algebra of `M` is defined as the quotient modulo this relation.
-/
inductive Rel : TensorAlgebra R M → TensorAlgebra R M → Prop
| of (m : M) : Rel (ι R m * ι R m) (algebraMap R _ (Q m))
end CliffordAlgebra
/-- The Clifford algebra of an `R`-module `M` equipped with a quadratic_form `Q`.
-/
def CliffordAlgebra :=
RingQuot (CliffordAlgebra.Rel Q)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
-- The `Inhabited, Semiring, Algebra` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (CliffordAlgebra Q) := RingQuot.instInhabited _
instance instRing : Ring (CliffordAlgebra Q) := RingQuot.instRing _
instance (priority := 900) instAlgebra' {R A M} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] [Module R M] [Module A M] (Q : QuadraticForm A M)
[IsScalarTower R A M] :
Algebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instAlgebra _
-- verify there are no diamonds
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : (Semiring.toNatAlgebra : Algebra ℕ (CliffordAlgebra Q)) = instAlgebra' _ := rfl
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
example : (Ring.toIntAlgebra _ : Algebra ℤ (CliffordAlgebra Q)) = instAlgebra' _ := rfl
-- shortcut instance, as the other instance is slow
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := instAlgebra' _
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M] (Q : QuadraticForm A M)
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] :
SMulCommClass R S (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instSMulCommClass _
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommGroup M] [CommRing A]
[SMul R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] [IsScalarTower R S A] (Q : QuadraticForm A M) :
IsScalarTower R S (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
RingQuot.instIsScalarTower _
/-- The canonical linear map `M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q`.
-/
def ι : M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(RingQuot.mkAlgHom R _).toLinearMap.comp (TensorAlgebra.ι R)
/-- As well as being linear, `ι Q` squares to the quadratic form -/
@[simp]
theorem ι_sq_scalar (m : M) : ι Q m * ι Q m = algebraMap R _ (Q m) := by
rw [ι]
erw [LinearMap.comp_apply]
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, ← map_mul (RingQuot.mkAlgHom R (Rel Q)),
RingQuot.mkAlgHom_rel R (Rel.of m), AlgHom.commutes]
rfl
variable {Q} {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
@[simp]
theorem comp_ι_sq_scalar (g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) (m : M) :
g (ι Q m) * g (ι Q m) = algebraMap _ _ (Q m) := by
rw [← map_mul, ι_sq_scalar, AlgHom.commutes]
variable (Q) in
/-- Given a linear map `f : M →ₗ[R] A` into an `R`-algebra `A`, which satisfies the condition:
`cond : ∀ m : M, f m * f m = Q(m)`, this is the canonical lift of `f` to a morphism of `R`-algebras
from `CliffordAlgebra Q` to `A`.
-/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift :
{ f : M →ₗ[R] A // ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m) } ≃ (CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) where
toFun f :=
RingQuot.liftAlgHom R
⟨TensorAlgebra.lift R (f : M →ₗ[R] A), fun x y (h : Rel Q x y) => by
induction h
rw [AlgHom.commutes, map_mul, TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply, f.prop]⟩
invFun F :=
⟨F.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q), fun m => by
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, comp_ι_sq_scalar]⟩
left_inv f := by
ext x
exact (RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ x)
right_inv F :=
RingQuot.ringQuot_ext' _ _ _ <|
TensorAlgebra.hom_ext <|
LinearMap.ext fun x ↦
(RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)) :
(lift Q ⟨f, cond⟩).toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) = f :=
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mp <| (lift Q).symm_apply_apply ⟨f, cond⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (cond : ∀ m, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m)) (x) :
lift Q ⟨f, cond⟩ (ι Q x) = f x :=
(LinearMap.ext_iff.mp <| ι_comp_lift f cond) x
@[simp]
theorem lift_unique (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (cond : ∀ m : M, f m * f m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m))
(g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) : g.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) = f ↔ g = lift Q ⟨f, cond⟩ := by
convert (lift Q : _ ≃ (CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A)).symm_apply_eq
rw [lift_symm_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_ι (g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A) :
lift Q ⟨g.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q), comp_ι_sq_scalar _⟩ = g := by
exact (lift Q : _ ≃ (CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A)).apply_symm_apply g
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] A} :
f.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) = g.toLinearMap.comp (ι Q) → f = g := by
intro h
apply (lift Q).symm.injective
rw [lift_symm_apply, lift_symm_apply]
simp only [h]
-- This proof closely follows `TensorAlgebra.induction`
/-- If `C` holds for the `algebraMap` of `r : R` into `CliffordAlgebra Q`, the `ι` of `x : M`,
and is preserved under addition and multiplication, then it holds for all of `CliffordAlgebra Q`.
See also the stronger `CliffordAlgebra.left_induction` and `CliffordAlgebra.right_induction`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction {C : CliffordAlgebra Q → Prop}
(algebraMap : ∀ r, C (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r)) (ι : ∀ x, C (ι Q x))
(mul : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a * b)) (add : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a + b))
(a : CliffordAlgebra Q) : C a := by
-- the arguments are enough to construct a subalgebra, and a mapping into it from M
let s : Subalgebra R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
{ carrier := C
mul_mem' := @mul
add_mem' := @add
algebraMap_mem' := algebraMap }
let of : { f : M →ₗ[R] s // ∀ m, f m * f m = _root_.algebraMap _ _ (Q m) } :=
⟨(CliffordAlgebra.ι Q).codRestrict (Subalgebra.toSubmodule s) ι,
fun m => Subtype.eq <| ι_sq_scalar Q m⟩
-- the mapping through the subalgebra is the identity
have of_id : s.val.comp (lift Q of) = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp [of]
-- porting note: `simp` should fire with the following lemma automatically
have := LinearMap.codRestrict_apply s.toSubmodule (CliffordAlgebra.ι Q) x (h := ι)
exact this
-- finding a proof is finding an element of the subalgebra
rw [← AlgHom.id_apply (R := R) a, ← of_id]
exact (lift Q of a).prop
theorem mul_add_swap_eq_polar_of_forall_mul_self_eq {A : Type*} [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(f : M →ₗ[R] A) (hf : ∀ x, f x * f x = algebraMap _ _ (Q x)) (a b : M) :
f a * f b + f b * f a = algebraMap R _ (QuadraticMap.polar Q a b) :=
calc
f a * f b + f b * f a = f (a + b) * f (a + b) - f a * f a - f b * f b := by
rw [f.map_add, mul_add, add_mul, add_mul]; abel
_ = algebraMap R _ (Q (a + b)) - algebraMap R _ (Q a) - algebraMap R _ (Q b) := by
rw [hf, hf, hf]
_ = algebraMap R _ (Q (a + b) - Q a - Q b) := by rw [← RingHom.map_sub, ← RingHom.map_sub]
_ = algebraMap R _ (QuadraticMap.polar Q a b) := rfl
/-- An alternative way to provide the argument to `CliffordAlgebra.lift` when `2` is invertible.
To show a function squares to the quadratic form, it suffices to show that
`f x * f y + f y * f x = algebraMap _ _ (polar Q x y)` -/
theorem forall_mul_self_eq_iff {A : Type*} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (h2 : IsUnit (2 : A))
(f : M →ₗ[R] A) :
(∀ x, f x * f x = algebraMap _ _ (Q x)) ↔
(LinearMap.mul R A).compl₂ f ∘ₗ f + (LinearMap.mul R A).flip.compl₂ f ∘ₗ f =
Q.polarBilin.compr₂ (Algebra.linearMap R A) := by
simp_rw [DFunLike.ext_iff]
refine ⟨mul_add_swap_eq_polar_of_forall_mul_self_eq _, fun h x => ?_⟩
change ∀ x y : M, f x * f y + f y * f x = algebraMap R A (QuadraticMap.polar Q x y) at h
apply h2.mul_left_cancel
rw [two_mul, two_mul, h x x, QuadraticMap.polar_self, two_smul, map_add]
/-- The symmetric product of vectors is a scalar -/
theorem ι_mul_ι_add_swap (a b : M) :
ι Q a * ι Q b + ι Q b * ι Q a = algebraMap R _ (QuadraticMap.polar Q a b) :=
mul_add_swap_eq_polar_of_forall_mul_self_eq _ (ι_sq_scalar _) _ _
theorem ι_mul_ι_comm (a b : M) :
ι Q a * ι Q b = algebraMap R _ (QuadraticMap.polar Q a b) - ι Q b * ι Q a :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq (ι_mul_ι_add_swap a b)
section isOrtho
@[simp] theorem ι_mul_ι_add_swap_of_isOrtho {a b : M} (h : Q.IsOrtho a b) :
| ι Q a * ι Q b + ι Q b * ι Q a = 0 := by
rw [ι_mul_ι_add_swap, h.polar_eq_zero]
simp
theorem ι_mul_ι_comm_of_isOrtho {a b : M} (h : Q.IsOrtho a b) :
ι Q a * ι Q b = -(ι Q b * ι Q a) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| ι_mul_ι_add_swap_of_isOrtho h
theorem mul_ι_mul_ι_of_isOrtho (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) {a b : M} (h : Q.IsOrtho a b) :
x * ι Q a * ι Q b = -(x * ι Q b * ι Q a) := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Basic.lean | 248 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Left Homology of short complexes
Given a short complex `S : ShortComplex C`, which consists of two composable
maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such that `f ≫ g = 0`, we shall define
here the "left homology" `S.leftHomology` of `S`. For this, we introduce the
notion of "left homology data". Such an `h : S.LeftHomologyData` consists of the
data of morphisms `i : K ⟶ X₂` and `π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies
`K` with the kernel of `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃`, and that `π` identifies `H` with the cokernel
of the induced map `f' : X₁ ⟶ K`.
When such a `S.LeftHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasLeftHomology]`
and we define `S.leftHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen left homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.cycles` to be the `K` field.
The dual notion is defined in `RightHomologyData.lean`. In `Homology.lean`,
when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data (i.e. they give
the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define `[S.HasHomology]`
and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] (S : ShortComplex C)
{S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` and
`π : K ⟶ H` such that `i` identifies `K` to the kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`,
and that `π` identifies `H` to the cokernel of the induced map `f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
structure LeftHomologyData where
/-- a choice of kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
K : C
/-- a choice of cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
H : C
/-- the inclusion of cycles in `S.X₂` -/
i : K ⟶ S.X₂
/-- the projection from cycles to the (left) homology -/
π : K ⟶ H
/-- the kernel condition for `i` -/
wi : i ≫ S.g = 0
/-- `i : K ⟶ S.X₂` is a kernel of `g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hi : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι i wi)
/-- the cokernel condition for `π` -/
wπ : hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι _ S.zero) ≫ π = 0
/-- `π : K ⟶ H` is a cokernel of the induced morphism `S.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ K` -/
hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ π wπ)
initialize_simps_projections LeftHomologyData (-hi, -hπ)
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- The chosen kernels and cokernels of the limits API give a `LeftHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kernel S.g
H := cokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)
i := kernel.ι _
π := cokernel.π _
wi := kernel.condition _
hi := kernelIsKernel _
wπ := cokernel.condition _
hπ := cokernelIsCokernel _
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wi wπ
variable {S}
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Mono h.i := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hi⟩
instance : Epi h.π := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hπ⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` that is a cycle (i.e. `k ≫ S.g = 0`) lifts
to a morphism `A ⟶ K` -/
def liftK (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.K := h.hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftK_i (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : h.liftK k hk ≫ h.i = k :=
h.hi.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.zero
/-- The (left) homology class `A ⟶ H` attached to a cycle `k : A ⟶ S.X₂` -/
@[simp]
def liftH (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (hk : k ≫ S.g = 0) : A ⟶ h.H := h.liftK k hk ≫ h.π
/-- Given `h : LeftHomologyData S`, this is morphism `S.X₁ ⟶ h.K` induced
by `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the fact that `h.K` is a kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K := h.liftK S.f S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_i : h.f' ≫ h.i = S.f := liftK_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma f'_π : h.f' ≫ h.π = 0 := h.wπ
@[reassoc]
lemma liftK_π_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : A ⟶ S.X₂) (x : A ⟶ S.X₁) (hx : k = x ≫ S.f) :
h.liftK k (by rw [hx, assoc, S.zero, comp_zero]) ≫ h.π = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = (x ≫ h.f') ≫ h.π by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, hx, liftK_i, assoc, f'_i]
/-- For `h : S.LeftHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hπ`, saying that
`π : h.K ⟶ h.H` is a cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
def hπ' : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ h.π h.f'_π) := h.hπ
/-- The morphism `H ⟶ A` induced by a morphism `k : K ⟶ A` such that `f' ≫ k = 0` -/
def descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.hπ.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma π_descH (k : h.K ⟶ A) (hk : h.f' ≫ k = 0) : h.π ≫ h.descH k hk = k :=
h.hπ.fac (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk) WalkingParallelPair.one
lemma isIso_i (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.i :=
⟨h.liftK (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hg, id_comp]),
by simp only [← cancel_mono h.i, id_comp, assoc, liftK_i, comp_id], liftK_i _ _ _⟩
lemma isIso_π (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.π := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' h.hπ' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_mono h.i, comp_id, f'_i, zero_comp, hf])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, hφ, by rw [← cancel_epi h.π, reassoc_of% hφ, comp_id]⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.f` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := c.pt
i := 𝟙 _
π := c.π
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := CokernelCofork.condition _
hπ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).f' = S.f := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).i, f'_i,
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_i]
dsimp
rw [comp_id]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := c.pt
H := c.pt
i := c.ι
π := 𝟙 _
wi := KernelFork.condition _
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _))
wπ := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf])
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ (Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hc (by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, zero_comp, Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, hf]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
(ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).i, f'_i, hf, zero_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the left homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂` gives a left homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.LeftHomologyData where
K := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
i := 𝟙 _
π := 𝟙 _
wi := by rw [id_comp, hg]
hi := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
wπ := by
change S.f ≫ 𝟙 _ = 0
simp only [hf, zero_comp]
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
@[simp] lemma ofZeros_f' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).f' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((ofZeros S hf hg).i), zero_comp, f'_i, hf]
end LeftHomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has left homology when there exists a `S.LeftHomologyData` -/
class HasLeftHomology : Prop where
condition : Nonempty S.LeftHomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.LeftHomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has left homology -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyData [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.LeftHomologyData := HasLeftHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
namespace HasLeftHomology
lemma mk' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : HasLeftHomology S := ⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance of_hasKernel_of_hasCokernel [HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero)] :
S.HasLeftHomology := HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
instance of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
end HasLeftHomology
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
/-- Given left homology data `h₁` and `h₂` for two short complexes `S₁` and `S₂`,
a `LeftHomologyMapData` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
consists of a description of the induced morphisms on the `K` (cycles)
and `H` (left homology) fields of `h₁` and `h₂`. -/
structure LeftHomologyMapData where
/-- the induced map on cycles -/
φK : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K
/-- the induced map on left homology -/
φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H
/-- commutation with `i` -/
commi : φK ≫ h₂.i = h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `f'` -/
commf' : h₁.f' ≫ φK = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `π` -/
commπ : h₁.π ≫ φH = φK ≫ h₂.π := by aesop_cat
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] commi commf' commπ
/-- The left homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
LeftHomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
φK := 0
φH := 0
/-- The left homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
φK := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of left homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : LeftHomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
LeftHomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
φK := ψ.φK ≫ ψ'.φK
φH := ψ.φH ≫ ψ'.φH
instance : Subsingleton (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨fun ψ₁ ψ₂ => by
have hK : ψ₁.φK = ψ₂.φK := by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.i, commi, commi]
have hH : ψ₁.φH = ψ₂.φH := by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.π, commπ, commπ, hK]
cases ψ₁
cases ψ₂
congr⟩
instance : Inhabited (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
let φK : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K := h₂.liftK (h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂)
(by rw [assoc, φ.comm₂₃, h₁.wi_assoc, zero_comp])
have commf' : h₁.f' ≫ φK = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by
rw [← cancel_mono h₂.i, assoc, assoc, LeftHomologyData.liftK_i,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i, φ.comm₁₂]
let φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := h₁.descH (φK ≫ h₂.π)
(by rw [reassoc_of% commf', h₂.f'_π, comp_zero])
exact ⟨φK, φH, by simp [φK], commf', by simp [φH]⟩⟩
instance : Unique (LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φH = γ₂.φH := by rw [eq]
lemma congr_φK {γ₁ γ₂ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φK = γ₂.φK := by rw [eq]
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on left homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
φK := φ.τ₂
φH := φ.τ₂
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on left homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φK := φ.τ₂
φH := f
commπ := comm.symm
commf' := by simp only [LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_f', φ.comm₁₂]
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on left homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
LeftHomologyMapData φ (LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φK := f
φH := f
commi := comm.symm
variable (S)
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the left homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the left homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(LeftHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
φK := 𝟙 _
φH := c.π
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the left homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the left homology data
`LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
LeftHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) (LeftHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(LeftHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
φK := c.ι
φH := c.ι
end LeftHomologyMapData
end
section
variable (S)
variable [S.HasLeftHomology]
/-- The left homology of a short complex, given by the `H` field of a chosen left homology data. -/
noncomputable def leftHomology : C := S.leftHomologyData.H
-- `S.leftHomology` is the simp normal form.
@[simp] lemma leftHomologyData_H : S.leftHomologyData.H = S.leftHomology := rfl
/-- The cycles of a short complex, given by the `K` field of a chosen left homology data. -/
noncomputable def cycles : C := S.leftHomologyData.K
/-- The "homology class" map `S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyπ : S.cycles ⟶ S.leftHomology := S.leftHomologyData.π
/-- The inclusion `S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : S.cycles ⟶ S.X₂ := S.leftHomologyData.i
/-- The "boundaries" map `S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles`. (Note that in this homology API, we make no use
of the "image" of this morphism, which under some categorical assumptions would be a subobject
of `S.X₂` contained in `S.cycles`.) -/
noncomputable def toCycles : S.X₁ ⟶ S.cycles := S.leftHomologyData.f'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma iCycles_g : S.iCycles ≫ S.g = 0 := S.leftHomologyData.wi
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_i : S.toCycles ≫ S.iCycles = S.f := S.leftHomologyData.f'_i
instance : Mono S.iCycles := by
dsimp only [iCycles]
infer_instance
instance : Epi S.leftHomologyπ := by
dsimp only [leftHomologyπ]
infer_instance
lemma leftHomology_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.leftHomology ⟶ A) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₁ = S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₂ := by
rw [cancel_epi]
@[ext]
lemma leftHomology_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.leftHomology ⟶ A)
(h : S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₁ = S.leftHomologyπ ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [leftHomology_ext_iff] using h
lemma cycles_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.cycles) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ f₁ ≫ S.iCycles = f₂ ≫ S.iCycles := by
rw [cancel_mono]
@[ext]
lemma cycles_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.cycles) (h : f₁ ≫ S.iCycles = f₂ ≫ S.iCycles) :
f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [cycles_ext_iff] using h
lemma isIso_iCycles (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso S.iCycles :=
LeftHomologyData.isIso_i _ hg
/-- When `S.g = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ S.X₂` induced by `S.iCycles`. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def cyclesIsoX₂ (hg : S.g = 0) : S.cycles ≅ S.X₂ := by
have := S.isIso_iCycles hg
exact asIso S.iCycles
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoX₂_hom_inv_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.iCycles ≫ (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv = 𝟙 _ := (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoX₂_inv_hom_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
(S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv ≫ S.iCycles = 𝟙 _ := (S.cyclesIsoX₂ hg).inv_hom_id
lemma isIso_leftHomologyπ (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso S.leftHomologyπ :=
LeftHomologyData.isIso_π _ hf
/-- When `S.f = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ S.leftHomology` induced
by `S.leftHomologyπ`. -/
@[simps! hom]
noncomputable def cyclesIsoLeftHomology (hf : S.f = 0) : S.cycles ≅ S.leftHomology := by
have := S.isIso_leftHomologyπ hf
exact asIso S.leftHomologyπ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoLeftHomology_hom_inv_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.leftHomologyπ ≫ (S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIsoLeftHomology_inv_hom_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv ≫ S.leftHomologyπ = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.cyclesIsoLeftHomology hf).inv_hom_id
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData)
/-- The (unique) left homology map data associated to a morphism of short complexes that
are both equipped with left homology data. -/
def leftHomologyMapData : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and left homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced left homology map `h₁.H ⟶ h₁.H`. -/
def leftHomologyMap' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := (leftHomologyMapData φ _ _).φH
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and left homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced morphism `h₁.K ⟶ h₁.K` on cycles. -/
def cyclesMap' : h₁.K ⟶ h₂.K := (leftHomologyMapData φ _ _).φK
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap'_i : cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.i = h₁.i ≫ φ.τ₂ :=
LeftHomologyMapData.commi _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma f'_cyclesMap' : h₁.f' ≫ cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = φ.τ₁ ≫ h₂.f' := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h₂.i, assoc, φ.comm₁₂, cyclesMap'_i,
LeftHomologyData.f'_i_assoc, LeftHomologyData.f'_i]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_naturality' :
h₁.π ≫ leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.π :=
LeftHomologyMapData.commπ _
end
section
variable [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- The (left) homology map `S₁.leftHomology ⟶ S₂.leftHomology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyMap : S₁.leftHomology ⟶ S₂.leftHomology :=
leftHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The morphism `S₁.cycles ⟶ S₂.cycles` induced by a morphism `S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def cyclesMap : S₁.cycles ⟶ S₂.cycles := cyclesMap' φ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesMap_i : cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.iCycles = S₁.iCycles ≫ φ.τ₂ :=
cyclesMap'_i _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toCycles_naturality : S₁.toCycles ≫ cyclesMap φ = φ.τ₁ ≫ S₂.toCycles :=
f'_cyclesMap' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma leftHomologyπ_naturality :
S₁.leftHomologyπ ≫ leftHomologyMap φ = cyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.leftHomologyπ :=
leftHomologyπ_naturality' _ _ _
end
namespace LeftHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma leftHomologyMap'_eq : leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φH :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma cyclesMap'_eq : cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φK :=
LeftHomologyMapData.congr_φK (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end LeftHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.id h).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_id (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.id h).cyclesMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_id [HasLeftHomology S] :
leftHomologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
leftHomologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_id [HasLeftHomology S] :
cyclesMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
cyclesMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).leftHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(LeftHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).cyclesMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap_zero [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] :
leftHomologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
leftHomologyMap'_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma cyclesMap_zero [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] :
cyclesMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
cyclesMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData) :
leftHomologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = leftHomologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
leftHomologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := leftHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ₂.leftHomologyMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).leftHomologyMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.comp_φH]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.LeftHomologyData) :
cyclesMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = cyclesMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫ cyclesMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := leftHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.cyclesMap'_eq, γ₂.cyclesMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).cyclesMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.comp_φK]
@[reassoc]
lemma leftHomologyMap_comp [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] [HasLeftHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
leftHomologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = leftHomologyMap φ₁ ≫ leftHomologyMap φ₂ :=
leftHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesMap_comp [HasLeftHomology S₁] [HasLeftHomology S₂] [HasLeftHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
cyclesMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = cyclesMap φ₁ ≫ cyclesMap φ₂ :=
cyclesMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
attribute [simp] leftHomologyMap_comp cyclesMap_comp
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `H` fields
of left homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def leftHomologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) : h₁.H ≅ h₂.H where
hom := leftHomologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := leftHomologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, leftHomologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, leftHomologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_leftHomologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
IsIso (leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (leftHomologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `K` fields
of left homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def cyclesMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) : h₁.K ≅ h₂.K where
hom := cyclesMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := cyclesMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cyclesMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, cyclesMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cyclesMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, cyclesMap'_id]
instance isIso_cyclesMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
IsIso (cyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (cyclesMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.leftHomology ≅ S₂.leftHomology` induced by an isomorphism of
short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def leftHomologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : S₁.leftHomology ≅ S₂.leftHomology where
hom := leftHomologyMap e.hom
inv := leftHomologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, leftHomologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← leftHomologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, leftHomologyMap_id]
instance isIso_leftHomologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[IsIso φ] [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
IsIso (leftHomologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (leftHomologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.cycles ≅ S₂.cycles` induced by an isomorphism
of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def cyclesMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : S₁.cycles ≅ S₂.cycles where
hom := cyclesMap e.hom
inv := cyclesMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← cyclesMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, cyclesMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← cyclesMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, cyclesMap_id]
instance isIso_cyclesMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasLeftHomology]
[S₂.HasLeftHomology] : IsIso (cyclesMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (cyclesMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [S.HasLeftHomology]
/-- The isomorphism `S.leftHomology ≅ h.H` induced by a left homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyIso : S.leftHomology ≅ h.H :=
leftHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- The isomorphism `S.cycles ≅ h.K` induced by a left homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def cyclesIso : S.cycles ≅ h.K :=
cyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesIso_hom_comp_i : h.cyclesIso.hom ≫ h.i = S.iCycles := by
dsimp [iCycles, LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso]
| simp only [cyclesMap'_i, id_τ₂, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/LeftHomology.lean | 710 | 712 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
/-! # Image and map operations on finite sets
This file provides the finite analog of `Set.image`, along with some other similar functions.
Note there are two ways to take the image over a finset; via `Finset.image` which applies the
function then removes duplicates (requiring `DecidableEq`), or via `Finset.map` which exploits
injectivity of the function to avoid needing to deduplicate. Choosing between these is similar to
choosing between `insert` and `Finset.cons`, or between `Finset.union` and `Finset.disjUnion`.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.filterMap` Given a function `f : α → Option β`, `s.filterMap f` is the
image finset in `β`, filtering out `none`s.
* `Finset.subtype`: `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose elements belong to `s`.
* `Finset.fin`:`s.fin n` is the finset of all elements of `s` less than `n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid OrderedCommMonoid
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Multiset
open Function
namespace Finset
/-! ### map -/
section Map
open Function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, s.2.map f.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : Finset α).map f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
-- Higher priority to apply before `mem_map`.
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f.toEmbedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_map]
exact
⟨by
rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩
simpa, fun h => ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ a, a ∈ s.map f → Prop} :
(∀ y (H : y ∈ s.map f), p y H) ↔ ∀ x (H : x ∈ s), p (f x) (mem_map_of_mem _ H) :=
⟨fun h y hy => h (f y) (mem_map_of_mem _ hy),
fun h x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_map.1 hx
exact h _ hy⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) (x : s) : f x ∈ s.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) = f '' s :=
Set.ext (by simp only [mem_coe, mem_map, Set.mem_image, implies_true])
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.map f) = f '' s := coe_map f s
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem map_perm {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : s.map (σ : α ↪ α) = s :=
coe_injective <| (coe_map _ _).trans <| Set.image_perm hs
theorem map_toFinset [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.map f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_map, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_toFinset]
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : s.map (Embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext fun _ => by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem map_cast_heq {α β} (h : α = β) (s : Finset α) :
HEq (s.map (Equiv.cast h).toEmbedding) s := by
subst h
simp
theorem map_map (f : α ↪ β) (g : β ↪ γ) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
theorem map_comm {β'} {f : β ↪ γ} {g : α ↪ β} {f' : α ↪ β'} {g' : β' ↪ γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.map g).map f = (s.map f').map g' := by
simp_rw [map_map, Embedding.trans, Function.comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_map {f : α ↪ β} {ga : α ↪ α} {gb : β ↪ β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) := fun _ =>
map_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_map {f g : α ↪ α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f ⊆ s₂.map f ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ xs => (mem_map' _).1 <| h <| (mem_map' f).2 xs,
fun h => by simp [subset_def, Multiset.map_subset_map h]⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_subset⟩ := map_subset_map
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.subset_symm_image`. -/
theorem subset_map_symm {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : s ⊆ t.map f.symm ↔ s.map f ⊆ t := by
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv, Equiv.symm_symm] at hx
simpa using h hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv]
exact h (by simp [hx])
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.symm_image_subset`. -/
theorem map_symm_subset {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : t.map f.symm ⊆ s ↔ t ⊆ s.map f := by
simp only [← subset_map_symm, Equiv.symm_symm]
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the order embedding that maps a finset to its
image under `f`. -/
def mapEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) : Finset α ↪o Finset β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (map f) fun _ _ => map_subset_map
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f = s₂.map f ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective.eq_iff
theorem map_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Injective (map f) :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective
@[simp]
theorem map_ssubset_map {s t : Finset α} : s.map f ⊂ t.map f ↔ s ⊂ t := (mapEmbedding f).lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_ssubset⟩ := map_ssubset_map
@[simp]
theorem mapEmbedding_apply : mapEmbedding f s = map f s :=
rfl
theorem filter_map {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.map f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).map f :=
eq_of_veq (Multiset.filter_map _ _ _)
lemma map_filter' (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α)
[DecidablePred (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = ·)] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [Function.comp_def, filter_map, f.injective.eq_iff]
lemma filter_attach' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
s.attach.filter p =
(s.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map
⟨Subtype.map id <| filter_subset _ _, Subtype.map_injective _ injective_id⟩ :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach' _ _
lemma filter_attach (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
s.attach.filter (fun a : s ↦ p a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map ((Embedding.refl _).subtypeMap mem_of_mem_filter) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach _ _
theorem map_filter {f : α ≃ β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.filter p).map f.toEmbedding = (s.map f.toEmbedding).filter (p ∘ f.symm) := by
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_map {s t : Finset α} (f : α ↪ β) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
mod_cast Set.disjoint_image_iff f.injective (s := s) (t := t)
theorem map_disjUnion {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h) (h' := (disjoint_map _).mpr h) :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_add _ _ _
/-- A version of `Finset.map_disjUnion` for writing in the other direction. -/
theorem map_disjUnion' {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h') (h := (disjoint_map _).mp h') :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
map_disjUnion _ _ _
theorem map_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∪ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem map_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∩ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_inter f.injective (s := s₁) (t := s₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) : map f {a} = {f a} :=
coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_map, coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_insert [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).map f = insert (f a) (s.map f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, map_union, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(cons a s ha).map f = cons (f a) (s.map f) (by simpa using ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_cons f a s.val
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_empty : s.map f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := (map_injective f).eq_iff' (map_empty f)
@[simp]
theorem map_nonempty : (s.map f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := s)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.map⟩ := map_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem map_nontrivial : (s.map f).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
mod_cast Set.image_nontrivial f.injective (s := s)
theorem attach_map_val {s : Finset α} : s.attach.map (Embedding.subtype _) = s :=
eq_of_veq <| by rw [map_val, attach_val]; exact Multiset.attach_map_val _
end Map
theorem range_add_one' (n : ℕ) :
range (n + 1) = insert 0 ((range n).map ⟨fun i => i + 1, fun i j => by simp⟩) := by
ext (⟨⟩ | ⟨n⟩) <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ n]
/-! ### image -/
section Image
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `image f s` is the forward image of `s` under `f`. -/
def image (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
(s.1.map f).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem image_val (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (image f s).1 = (s.1.map f).dedup :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : (∅ : Finset α).image f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f g : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {a : α} {b c : β}
@[simp]
theorem mem_image : b ∈ s.image f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b := by
simp only [mem_def, image_val, mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop]
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ s.image f :=
mem_image.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
lemma forall_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
lemma exists_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image := forall_mem_image
theorem map_eq_image (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : s.map f = s.image f :=
eq_of_veq (s.map f).2.dedup.symm
-- Not `@[simp]` since `mem_image` already gets most of the way there.
theorem mem_image_const : c ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ b = c := by
rw [mem_image]
simp only [exists_prop, const_apply, exists_and_right]
rfl
theorem mem_image_const_self : b ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mem_image_const.trans <| and_iff_left rfl
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift β α c p] :
CanLift (Finset β) (Finset α) (image c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨⟨l⟩, hd : l.Nodup⟩ hl
lift l to List α using hl
exact ⟨⟨l, hd.of_map _⟩, ext fun a => by simp⟩
theorem image_congr (h : (s : Set α).EqOn f g) : Finset.image f s = Finset.image g s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_image, ← bex_def]
exact exists₂_congr fun x hx => by rw [h hx]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_finset_image (hf : Injective f) :
f a ∈ s.image f ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem f⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, heq⟩ := mem_image.1 h
exact hf heq ▸ hy
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image : ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s :=
Set.ext <| by simp only [mem_coe, mem_image, Set.mem_image, implies_true]
@[simp]
lemma image_nonempty : (s.image f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := (s : Set α))
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.image (h : s.Nonempty) (f : α → β) : (s.image f).Nonempty :=
image_nonempty.2 h
alias ⟨Nonempty.of_image, _⟩ := image_nonempty
theorem image_toFinset [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.image f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_image, Multiset.mem_toFinset, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_map]
theorem image_val_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (image f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
(s.2.map_on H).dedup
@[simp]
theorem image_id [DecidableEq α] : s.image id = s :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, id, exists_eq_right]
@[simp]
theorem image_id' [DecidableEq α] : (s.image fun x => x) = s :=
image_id
theorem image_image [DecidableEq γ] {g : β → γ} : (s.image f).image g = s.image (g ∘ f) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [image_val, dedup_map_dedup_eq, Multiset.map_map]
theorem image_comm {β'} [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'}
{g' : β' → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) :
(s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by simp_rw [image_image, comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_image [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_image [DecidableEq α] {f g : α → α}
(h : Function.Commute f g) : Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_image h
theorem image_subset_image {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.image f ⊆ s₂.image f := by
simp only [subset_def, image_val, subset_dedup', dedup_subset', Multiset.map_subset_map h]
theorem image_subset_iff : s.image f ⊆ t ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t :=
calc
s.image f ⊆ t ↔ f '' ↑s ⊆ ↑t := by norm_cast
_ ↔ _ := Set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_mono (f : α → β) : Monotone (Finset.image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset_image
lemma image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
simpa only [funext (map_eq_image _)] using map_injective ⟨f, hf⟩
lemma image_inj {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) : s.image f = t.image f ↔ s = t :=
(image_injective hf).eq_iff
theorem image_subset_image_iff {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) :
s.image f ⊆ t.image f ↔ s ⊆ t :=
mod_cast Set.image_subset_image_iff hf (s := s) (t := t)
lemma image_ssubset_image {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) : s.image f ⊂ t.image f ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp_rw [← lt_iff_ssubset]
exact lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (image_subset_image_iff hf) (image_subset_image_iff hf)
theorem coe_image_subset_range : ↑(s.image f) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s := coe_image
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem filter_image {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.image f).filter p = (s.filter fun a ↦ p (f a)).image f :=
ext fun b => by
simp only [mem_filter, mem_image, exists_prop]
exact
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩; exact ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩,
by rintro ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩⟩
theorem fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image {y : β} : (s.filter (f · = y)).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem image_union [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∪ s₂.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem image_inter_subset [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).image f ⊆ s.image f ∩ t.image f :=
(image_mono f).map_inf_le s t
theorem image_inter_of_injOn [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s t : Finset α)
(hf : Set.InjOn f (s ∪ t)) : (s ∩ t).image f = s.image f ∩ t.image f :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_inter_on fun a ha b hb => hf (Or.inr ha) <| Or.inl hb
theorem image_inter [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective f) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∩ s₂.image f :=
image_inter_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : image f {a} = {f a} :=
ext fun x => by simpa only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left] using eq_comm
@[simp]
theorem image_insert [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).image f = insert (f a) (s.image f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, image_singleton, image_union]
theorem erase_image_subset_image_erase [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(s.image f).erase (f a) ⊆ (s.erase a).image f := by
simp only [subset_iff, and_imp, exists_prop, mem_image, exists_imp, mem_erase]
rintro b hb x hx rfl
exact ⟨_, ⟨ne_of_apply_ne f hb, hx⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_erase [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(s.erase a).image f = (s.image f).erase (f a) :=
coe_injective <| by push_cast [Set.image_diff hf, Set.image_singleton]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_eq_empty : s.image f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := mod_cast Set.image_eq_empty (f := f) (s := s)
theorem image_sdiff [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s t : Finset α) (hf : Injective f) :
(s \ t).image f = s.image f \ t.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_diff hf s t
lemma image_sdiff_of_injOn [DecidableEq α] {t : Finset α} (hf : Set.InjOn f s) (hts : t ⊆ s) :
(s \ t).image f = s.image f \ t.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_diff_of_injOn hf <| coe_subset.2 hts
theorem _root_.Disjoint.of_image_finset {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β}
(h : Disjoint (s.image f) (t.image f)) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_iff_ne.2 fun _ ha _ hb =>
ne_of_apply_ne f <| h.forall_ne_finset (mem_image_of_mem _ ha) (mem_image_of_mem _ hb)
theorem mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' [DecidableEq α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀ i, f (i % n) = f i) :
a ∈ Set.range f ↔ a ∈ (Finset.range n).image fun i => f i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_range]
exact ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt i hn, (rfl.congr hi).mp (h i)⟩
· rintro h
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, Set.mem_range, mem_range] at *
rcases h with ⟨i, _, ha⟩
exact ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq [DecidableEq α] {f : ℤ → α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀ i, f (i % n) = f i) :
a ∈ Set.range f ↔ a ∈ (Finset.range n).image (fun (i : ℕ) => f i) :=
suffices (∃ i, f (i % n) = a) ↔ ∃ i, i < n ∧ f ↑i = a by simpa [h]
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr hn
Iff.intro
(fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
have : 0 ≤ i % ↑n := Int.emod_nonneg _ (ne_of_gt hn')
⟨Int.toNat (i % n), by
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this]; exact ⟨Int.emod_lt_of_pos i hn', hi⟩⟩)
fun ⟨i, hi, ha⟩ =>
⟨i, by rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt (Int.ofNat_zero_le _) (Int.ofNat_lt_ofNat_of_lt hi), ha]⟩
@[simp]
theorem attach_image_val [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} : s.attach.image Subtype.val = s :=
eq_of_veq <| by rw [image_val, attach_val, Multiset.attach_map_val, dedup_eq_self]
@[simp]
theorem attach_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Finset α} :
attach (insert a s) =
insert (⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩ : { x // x ∈ insert a s })
((attach s).image fun x => ⟨x.1, mem_insert_of_mem x.2⟩) :=
ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
⟨Or.casesOn (mem_insert.1 hx)
(fun h : x = a => fun _ => mem_insert.2 <| Or.inl <| Subtype.eq h) fun h : x ∈ s => fun _ =>
mem_insert_of_mem <| mem_image.2 <| ⟨⟨x, h⟩, mem_attach _ _, Subtype.eq rfl⟩,
fun _ => Finset.mem_attach _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_image {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.image f) (t.image f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
mod_cast Set.disjoint_image_iff hf (s := s) (t := t)
theorem image_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) (b : β) : (s.image fun _ => b) = singleton b :=
mod_cast Set.Nonempty.image_const (coe_nonempty.2 h) b
@[simp]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq α] (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(s.erase a).map f = (s.map f).erase (f a) := by
simp_rw [map_eq_image]
exact s.image_erase f.2 a
end Image
/-! ### filterMap -/
section FilterMap
/-- `filterMap f s` is a combination filter/map operation on `s`.
The function `f : α → Option β` is applied to each element of `s`;
if `f a` is `some b` then `b` is included in the result, otherwise
`a` is excluded from the resulting finset.
In notation, `filterMap f s` is the finset `{b : β | ∃ a ∈ s , f a = some b}`. -/
-- TODO: should there be `filterImage` too?
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Finset α)
(f_inj : ∀ a a' b, b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') : Finset β :=
⟨s.val.filterMap f, s.nodup.filterMap f f_inj⟩
variable (f : α → Option β) (s' : Finset α) {s t : Finset α}
{f_inj : ∀ a a' b, b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a'}
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_val : (filterMap f s' f_inj).1 = s'.1.filterMap f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_empty : (∅ : Finset α).filterMap f f_inj = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_filterMap {b : β} : b ∈ s.filterMap f f_inj ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = some b :=
s.val.mem_filterMap f
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_filterMap : (s.filterMap f f_inj : Set β) = {b | ∃ a ∈ s, f a = some b} :=
Set.ext (by simp only [mem_coe, mem_filterMap, Option.mem_def, Set.mem_setOf_eq, implies_true])
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_some : s.filterMap some (by simp) = s :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filterMap, Option.some.injEq, exists_eq_right]
theorem filterMap_mono (h : s ⊆ t) :
filterMap f s f_inj ⊆ filterMap f t f_inj := by
rw [← val_le_iff] at h ⊢
exact Multiset.filterMap_le_filterMap f h
@[simp]
theorem _root_.List.toFinset_filterMap [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : List α) :
(s.filterMap f).toFinset = s.toFinset.filterMap f f_inj := by
simp [← Finset.coe_inj]
end FilterMap
/-! ### Subtype -/
section Subtype
/-- Given a finset `s` and a predicate `p`, `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose
elements belong to `s`. -/
protected def subtype {α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) : Finset (Subtype p) :=
(s.filter p).attach.map
⟨fun x => ⟨x.1, by simpa using (Finset.mem_filter.1 x.2).2⟩,
fun _ _ H => Subtype.eq <| Subtype.mk.inj H⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_subtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {s : Finset α} :
∀ {a : Subtype p}, a ∈ s.subtype p ↔ (a : α) ∈ s
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by simp [Finset.subtype, ha]
theorem subtype_eq_empty {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {s : Finset α} :
s.subtype p = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∉ s := by simp [Finset.ext_iff, Subtype.forall, Subtype.coe_mk]
@[mono]
theorem subtype_mono {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] : Monotone (Finset.subtype p) :=
fun _ _ h _ hx => mem_subtype.2 <| h <| mem_subtype.1 hx
/-- `s.subtype p` converts back to `s.filter p` with
`Embedding.subtype`. -/
@[simp]
theorem subtype_map (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] {s : Finset α} :
(s.subtype p).map (Embedding.subtype _) = s.filter p := by
ext x
simp [@and_comm _ (_ = _), @and_left_comm _ (_ = _), @and_comm (p x) (x ∈ s)]
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`,
`s.subtype p` converts back to `s` with `Embedding.subtype`. -/
theorem subtype_map_of_mem {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
(s.subtype p).map (Embedding.subtype _) = s := ext <| by simpa [subtype_map] using h
/-- If a `Finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`Embedding.subtype`, all elements of the result have the property of
the subtype. -/
theorem property_of_mem_map_subtype {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset { x // p x }) {a : α}
(h : a ∈ s.map (Embedding.subtype _)) : p a := by
rcases mem_map.1 h with ⟨x, _, rfl⟩
exact x.2
/-- If a `Finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`Embedding.subtype`, the result does not contain any value that does
not satisfy the property of the subtype. -/
theorem not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property {p : α → Prop} (s : Finset { x // p x }) {a : α}
(h : ¬p a) : a ∉ s.map (Embedding.subtype _) :=
mt s.property_of_mem_map_subtype h
/-- If a `Finset` of a subtype is converted to the main type with
`Embedding.subtype`, the result is a subset of the set giving the
subtype. -/
theorem map_subtype_subset {t : Set α} (s : Finset t) : ↑(s.map (Embedding.subtype _)) ⊆ t := by
intro a ha
rw [mem_coe] at ha
convert property_of_mem_map_subtype s ha
end Subtype
/-- If a `Finset` is a subset of the image of a `Set` under `f`,
then it is equal to the `Finset.image` of a `Finset` subset of that `Set`. -/
theorem subset_set_image_iff [DecidableEq β] {s : Set α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β} :
↑t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ s' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ s'.image f = t := by
constructor
· intro h
letI : CanLift β s (f ∘ (↑)) fun y => y ∈ f '' s := ⟨fun y ⟨x, hxt, hy⟩ => ⟨⟨x, hxt⟩, hy⟩⟩
lift t to Finset s using h
refine ⟨t.map (Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, ?_⟩
ext y; simp
· rintro ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
rw [coe_image]
exact Set.image_subset f ht
/--
If a finset `t` is a subset of the image of another finset `s` under `f`, then it is equal to the
image of a subset of `s`.
For the version where `s` is a set, see `subset_set_image_iff`.
-/
theorem subset_image_iff [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β} :
t ⊆ s.image f ↔ ∃ s' : Finset α, s' ⊆ s ∧ s'.image f = t := by
simp only [← coe_subset, coe_image, subset_set_image_iff]
theorem range_sdiff_zero {n : ℕ} : range (n + 1) \ {0} = (range n).image Nat.succ := by
induction' n with k hk
· simp
conv_rhs => rw [range_succ]
rw [range_succ, image_insert, ← hk, insert_sdiff_of_not_mem]
simp
end Finset
theorem Multiset.toFinset_map [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (m : Multiset α) :
(m.map f).toFinset = m.toFinset.image f :=
Finset.val_inj.1 (Multiset.dedup_map_dedup_eq _ _).symm
namespace Equiv
/-- Given an equivalence `α` to `β`, produce an equivalence between `Finset α` and `Finset β`. -/
protected def finsetCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Finset α ≃ Finset β where
toFun s := s.map e.toEmbedding
invFun s := s.map e.symm.toEmbedding
left_inv s := by simp [Finset.map_map]
right_inv s := by simp [Finset.map_map]
@[simp]
theorem finsetCongr_apply (e : α ≃ β) (s : Finset α) : e.finsetCongr s = s.map e.toEmbedding :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem finsetCongr_refl : (Equiv.refl α).finsetCongr = Equiv.refl _ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem finsetCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.finsetCongr.symm = e.symm.finsetCongr :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem finsetCongr_trans (e : α ≃ β) (e' : β ≃ γ) :
e.finsetCongr.trans e'.finsetCongr = (e.trans e').finsetCongr := by
ext
simp [-Finset.mem_map, -Equiv.trans_toEmbedding]
theorem finsetCongr_toEmbedding (e : α ≃ β) :
e.finsetCongr.toEmbedding = (Finset.mapEmbedding e.toEmbedding).toEmbedding :=
rfl
/-- Given a predicate `p : α → Prop`, produces an equivalence between
`Finset {a : α // p a}` and `{s : Finset α // ∀ a ∈ s, p a}`. -/
@[simps]
protected def finsetSubtypeComm (p : α → Prop) :
Finset {a : α // p a} ≃ {s : Finset α // ∀ a ∈ s, p a} where
toFun s := ⟨s.map ⟨fun a ↦ a.val, Subtype.val_injective⟩, fun _ h ↦
have ⟨v, _, h⟩ := Embedding.coeFn_mk _ _ ▸ mem_map.mp h; h ▸ v.property⟩
invFun s := s.val.attach.map (Subtype.impEmbedding _ _ s.property)
left_inv s := by
ext a; constructor <;> intro h <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists, Embedding.coeFn_mk,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, Subtype.impEmbedding, Subtype.mk.injEq] at *
· rcases h with ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂⟩; exact h₂ ▸ h₁
· use a, ⟨a.property, h⟩
right_inv s := by
| ext a; constructor <;> intro h <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists, Embedding.coeFn_mk,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, Subtype.impEmbedding, Subtype.mk.injEq] at *
· rcases h with ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩; exact h₂ ▸ h₁
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Image.lean | 713 | 716 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
/-!
# The sheaf condition for a presieve
We define what it means for a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v` to be a sheaf *for* a particular
presieve `R` on `X`:
* A *family of elements* `x` for `P` at `R` is an element `x_f` of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`. See `FamilyOfElements`.
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and `f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` both in `R`,
and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂` such that `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`, the restriction of
`x_f₁` along `g₁` agrees with the restriction of `x_f₂` along `g₂`.
See `FamilyOfElements.Compatible`.
* An *amalgamation* `t` for the family is an element of `P X` such that for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`, the restriction of `t` on `f` is `x_f`.
See `FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation`.
We then say `P` is *separated* for `R` if every compatible family has at most one amalgamation,
and it is a *sheaf* for `R` if every compatible family has a unique amalgamation.
See `IsSeparatedFor` and `IsSheafFor`.
In the special case where `R` is a sieve, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R` and `g : Z ⟶ Y`, the restriction of
`x_f` along `g` agrees with `x_(g ≫ f)` (which is well defined since `g ≫ f` is in `R`).
See `FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible` and `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
In the special case where `C` has pullbacks, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` both in `R`,
the restriction of `x_f` along `π₁ : pullback f g ⟶ Y` agrees with the restriction of `x_g`
along `π₂ : pullback f g ⟶ Z`.
See `FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible` and `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
We also provide equivalent conditions to satisfy alternate definitions given in the literature.
* Stacks: The condition of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8 is virtually identical to the
statement of `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition` (since the bijection described there carries
the same information as the unique existence.)
* Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92]: Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`, the definitions of `IsSheaf`
are equivalent. There are also alternate definitions given:
- Yoneda condition: Defined in `yonedaSheafCondition` and equivalence in
`isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
- Matching family for presieves with pullback: `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
## Implementation
The sheaf condition is given as a proposition, rather than a subsingleton in `Type (max u₁ v)`.
This doesn't seem to make a big difference, other than making a couple of definitions noncomputable,
but it means that equivalent conditions can be given as `↔` statements rather than `≃` statements,
which can be convenient.
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.1.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00ZB (sheaves on a topology)
-/
universe w w' v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf `P` given a collection of arrows `R` with fixed codomain `X`
consists of an element of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R`.
A presheaf is a sheaf (resp, separated) if every *compatible* family of elements has exactly one
(resp, at most one) amalgamation.
This data is referred to as a `family` in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. It is also a concrete
version of the elements of the middle object in the Stacks entry which is
more useful for direct calculations. It is also used implicitly in Definition C2.1.2 in [Elephant].
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is a concrete version of the elements of the middle object there."]
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf on the presieve `R₂` can be restricted to a smaller presieve
`R₁`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
/-- The image of a family of elements by a morphism of presheaves. -/
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
/-- A family of elements for the arrow set `R` is *compatible* if for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and
`f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` in `R`, and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂`, if the square `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`
commutes then the elements of `P Z` obtained by restricting the element of `P Y₁` along `g₁` and
restricting the element of `P Y₂` along `g₂` are the same.
In special cases, this condition can be simplified, see `pullbackCompatible_iff` and
`compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is referred to as a "compatible family" in Definition C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and on nlab:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.Compatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
/--
If the category `C` has pullbacks, this is an alternative condition for a family of elements to be
compatible: For any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` in the presieve `R`, the restriction of the
given elements for `f` and `g` to the pullback agree.
This is equivalent to being compatible (provided `C` has pullbacks), shown in
`pullbackCompatible_iff`.
This is the definition for a "matching" family given in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
Equation (5). Viewing the type `FamilyOfElements` as the middle object of the fork in
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM, this condition expresses that `pr₀* (x) = pr₁* (x)`,
using the notation defined there.
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.PullbackCompatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst f₁ f₂).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map (pullback.snd f₁ f₂).op (x f₂ h₂)
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
/-- The restriction of a compatible family is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
/-- Extend a family of elements to the sieve generated by an arrow set.
This is the construction described as "easy" in Lemma C2.1.3 of [Elephant].
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
/-- The extension of a compatible family to the generated sieve is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
/-- The extension of a family agrees with the original family. -/
theorem extend_agrees {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : R f) :
x.sieveExtend f (le_generate R Y hf) = x f hf := by
have h := (le_generate R Y hf).choose_spec
unfold FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
rw [t h.choose (𝟙 _) _ hf _]
· simp
· rw [id_comp]
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
/-- The restriction of an extension is the original. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.restrict (le_generate R) = x := by
funext Y f hf
exact extend_agrees t hf
/--
If the arrow set for a family of elements is actually a sieve (i.e. it is downward closed) then the
consistency condition can be simplified.
This is an equivalent condition, see `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is the notion of "matching" given for families on sieves given in [MM92], Chapter III,
Section 4, Equation 1, and nlab: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family.
See also the discussion before Lemma C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
def FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y Z⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (hf), x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf)
theorem compatible_iff_sieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
x.Compatible ↔ x.SieveCompatible := by
constructor
· intro h Y Z f g hf
simpa using h (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
· intro h Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ k
simp_rw [← h f₁ g₁ h₁, ← h f₂ g₂ h₂]
congr
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible {x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)}
(t : x.Compatible) : x.SieveCompatible :=
(compatible_iff_sieveCompatible x).1 t
/--
Given a family of elements `x` for the sieve `S` generated by a presieve `R`, if `x` is restricted
to `R` and then extended back up to `S`, the resulting extension equals `x`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem extend_restrict {x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R).arrows} (t : x.Compatible) :
(x.restrict (le_generate R)).sieveExtend = x := by
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at t
funext _ _ h
apply (t _ _ _).symm.trans
congr
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
/--
Two compatible families on the sieve generated by a presieve `R` are equal if and only if they are
equal when restricted to `R`.
-/
theorem restrict_inj {x₁ x₂ : FamilyOfElements P (generate R).arrows} (t₁ : x₁.Compatible)
(t₂ : x₂.Compatible) : x₁.restrict (le_generate R) = x₂.restrict (le_generate R) → x₁ = x₂ :=
fun h => by
rw [← extend_restrict t₁, ← extend_restrict t₂]
-- Porting note: congr fails to make progress
apply congr_arg
exact h
/-- Compatible families of elements for a presheaf of types `P` and a presieve `R`
are in 1-1 correspondence with compatible families for the same presheaf and
the sieve generated by `R`, through extension and restriction. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible :
{ x : FamilyOfElements P R // x.Compatible } ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.sieveExtend, x.2.sieveExtend⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1.restrict (le_generate R), x.2.restrict _⟩
left_inv x := Subtype.ext (restrict_extend x.2)
right_inv x := Subtype.ext (extend_restrict x.2)
theorem FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible (S : Sieve X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : S f) {Z} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf) := by
simpa using t (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
section FunctorPullback
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C) {Z : D}
variable {T : Presieve (F.obj Z)} {x : FamilyOfElements P T}
/--
Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `F(X)`, we can realize it as a family of elements of
`S.functorPullback F`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.functorPullback (x : FamilyOfElements P T) :
FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) (T.functorPullback F) := fun _ f hf => x (F.map f) hf
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback (h : x.Compatible) :
(x.functorPullback F).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
exact h (F.map g₁) (F.map g₂) h₁ h₂ (by simp only [← F.map_comp, eq])
end FunctorPullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X` whose values factors through `F`, we can
realize it as a family of elements of `S.functorPushforward F`. Since the preimage is obtained by
choice, this is not well-defined generally.
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C)
{X : D} {T : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) T) :
FamilyOfElements P (T.functorPushforward F) := fun Y f h => by
obtain ⟨Z, g, h, h₁, _⟩ := getFunctorPushforwardStructure h
exact P.map h.op (x g h₁)
section Pullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X`, and a map `Y ⟶ X`, we can obtain a
family of elements of `S.pullback f` by taking the same elements.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
FamilyOfElements P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y) := fun _ g hg => x (g ≫ f) hg
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S.arrows}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.pullback f).Compatible := by
simp only [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at h ⊢
intro W Z f₁ f₂ hf
unfold FamilyOfElements.pullback
rw [← h (f₁ ≫ f) f₂ hf]
congr 1
simp only [assoc]
end Pullback
/-- Given a morphism of presheaves `f : P ⟶ Q`, we can take a family of elements valued in `P` to a
family of elements valued in `Q` by composing with `f`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements Q R := fun Y g hg => f.app (op Y) (x g hg)
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_id (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
x.compPresheafMap (𝟙 P) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_comp (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (f : P ⟶ Q)
(g : Q ⟶ U) : (x.compPresheafMap f).compPresheafMap g = x.compPresheafMap (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.compPresheafMap f).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
unfold FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.naturality, ← FunctorToTypes.naturality, h]
/--
The given element `t` of `P.obj (op X)` is an *amalgamation* for the family of elements `x` if every
restriction `P.map f.op t = x_f` for every arrow `f` in the presieve `R`.
This is the definition given in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents,
and https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family, as well as [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
equation (2).
-/
def FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : R f), P.map f.op t = x f h
theorem FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation.compPresheafMap {x : FamilyOfElements P R} {t} (f : P ⟶ Q)
(h : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.compPresheafMap f).IsAmalgamation (f.app (op X) t) := by
intro Y g hg
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap]
change (f.app _ ≫ Q.map _) _ = _
rw [← f.naturality, types_comp_apply, h g hg]
theorem is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(h : ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.Compatible := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := h
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ comm
rw [← ht _ h₁, ← ht _ h₂, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, comm]
simp
theorem isAmalgamation_restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) (x : FamilyOfElements P R₂)
(t : P.obj (op X)) (ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.restrict h).IsAmalgamation t := fun Y f hf =>
ht f (h Y hf)
theorem isAmalgamation_sieveExtend {R : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X))
(ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.sieveExtend.IsAmalgamation t := by
intro Y f hf
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend]
rw [← ht _, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
/-- A presheaf is separated for a presieve if there is at most one amalgamation. -/
def IsSeparatedFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t₁ t₂), x.IsAmalgamation t₁ → x.IsAmalgamation t₂ → t₁ = t₂
theorem IsSeparatedFor.ext {R : Presieve X} (hR : IsSeparatedFor P R) {t₁ t₂ : P.obj (op X)}
(h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (_ : R f), P.map f.op t₁ = P.map f.op t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
hR (fun _ f _ => P.map f.op t₂) t₁ t₂ (fun _ _ hf => h hf) fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem isSeparatedFor_iff_generate :
IsSeparatedFor P R ↔ IsSeparatedFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
constructor
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h (x.restrict (le_generate R)) t₁ t₂ _ _
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₂ ht₂
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h x.sieveExtend
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₂ ht₂
theorem isSeparatedFor_top (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSeparatedFor P (⊤ : Presieve X) :=
fun x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂ => by
have q₁ := h₁ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
have q₂ := h₂ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
simp only [op_id, FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply] at q₁ q₂
rw [q₁, q₂]
/-- We define `P` to be a sheaf for the presieve `R` if every compatible family has a unique
amalgamation.
This is the definition of a sheaf for the given presieve given in C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents.
Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`,
this is equivalent to the definition of a sheaf in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def IsSheafFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃! t, x.IsAmalgamation t
/-- This is an equivalent condition to be a sheaf, which is useful for the abstraction to local
operators on elementary toposes. However this definition is defined only for sieves, not presieves.
The equivalence between this and `IsSheafFor` is given in `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
This version is also useful to establish that being a sheaf is preserved under isomorphism of
presheaves.
See the discussion before Equation (3) of [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. See also C2.1.4 of
[Elephant]. -/
@[stacks 00Z8 "Direct reformulation"]
def YonedaSheafCondition (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) (S : Sieve X) : Prop :=
∀ f : S.functor ⟶ P, ∃! g, S.functorInclusion ≫ g = f
-- TODO: We can generalize the universe parameter v₁ above by composing with
-- appropriate `ulift_functor`s.
/-- (Implementation). This is a (primarily internal) equivalence between natural transformations
and compatible families.
Cf the discussion after Lemma 7.47.10 in <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00YW>. See also
the proof of C2.1.4 of [Elephant], and the discussion in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def natTransEquivCompatibleFamily {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
(S.functor ⟶ P) ≃ { x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun α := by
refine ⟨fun Y f hf => ?_, ?_⟩
· apply α.app (op Y) ⟨_, hf⟩
· rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
intro Y Z f g hf
dsimp
rw [← FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ α g.op]
rfl
invFun t :=
{ app := fun _ f => t.1 _ f.2
naturality := fun Y Z g => by
ext ⟨f, hf⟩
apply t.2.to_sieveCompatible _ }
left_inv α := by
ext X ⟨_, _⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rfl
/-- (Implementation). A lemma useful to prove `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`. -/
theorem extension_iff_amalgamation {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (x : S.functor ⟶ P) (g : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) :
S.functorInclusion ≫ g = x ↔
(natTransEquivCompatibleFamily x).1.IsAmalgamation (yonedaEquiv g) := by
change _ ↔ ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : S f), P.map f.op (yonedaEquiv g) = x.app (op Y) ⟨f, h⟩
constructor
· rintro rfl Y f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp
simp [yonedaEquiv_apply]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
· intro h
ext Y ⟨f, hf⟩
convert h f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp [yonedaEquiv]
simp
/-- The yoneda version of the sheaf condition is equivalent to the sheaf condition.
C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
theorem isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X) ↔ YonedaSheafCondition P S := by
rw [IsSheafFor, YonedaSheafCondition]
simp_rw [extension_iff_amalgamation]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr_left natTransEquivCompatibleFamily]
rw [Subtype.forall]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ by simp [Equiv.existsUnique_congr_right]
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for the sieve `S` on `X`, a natural transformation from `S` (viewed as a functor)
to `P` can be (uniquely) extended to all of `yoneda.obj X`.
f
S → P
↓ ↗
yX
-/
noncomputable def IsSheafFor.extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(f : S.functor ⟶ P) : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).exists.choose
/--
Show that the extension of `f : S.functor ⟶ P` to all of `yoneda.obj X` is in fact an extension, ie
that the triangle below commutes, provided `P` is a sheaf for `S`
f
S → P
↓ ↗
yX
-/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem IsSheafFor.functorInclusion_comp_extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P S.arrows)
(f : S.functor ⟶ P) : S.functorInclusion ≫ h.extend f = f :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).exists.choose_spec
/-- The extension of `f` to `yoneda.obj X` is unique. -/
theorem IsSheafFor.unique_extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P S.arrows) {f : S.functor ⟶ P}
(t : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) (ht : S.functorInclusion ≫ t = f) : t = h.extend f :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).unique ht (h.functorInclusion_comp_extend f)
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for the sieve `S` on `X`, then if two natural transformations from `yoneda.obj X`
to `P` agree when restricted to the subfunctor given by `S`, they are equal.
-/
theorem IsSheafFor.hom_ext {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(t₁ t₂ : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) (ht : S.functorInclusion ≫ t₁ = S.functorInclusion ≫ t₂) :
t₁ = t₂ :=
(h.unique_extend t₁ ht).trans (h.unique_extend t₂ rfl).symm
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `R` iff it is separated for `R` and there exists an amalgamation. -/
theorem isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor :
(IsSeparatedFor P R ∧ ∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) ↔
IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [IsSeparatedFor, ← forall_and]
apply forall_congr'
intro x
constructor
· intro z hx
exact existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique (z.2 hx) z.1
· intro h
refine ⟨?_, ExistsUnique.exists ∘ h⟩
intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply (h _).unique ht₁ ht₂
exact is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation x ⟨_, ht₂⟩
/-- If `P` is separated for `R` and every family has an amalgamation, then `P` is a sheaf for `R`.
-/
theorem IsSeparatedFor.isSheafFor (t : IsSeparatedFor P R) :
(∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) → IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
exact And.intro t
/-- If `P` is a sheaf for `R`, it is separated for `R`. -/
theorem IsSheafFor.isSeparatedFor : IsSheafFor P R → IsSeparatedFor P R := fun q =>
(isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor.2 q).1
/-- Get the amalgamation of the given compatible family, provided we have a sheaf. -/
noncomputable def IsSheafFor.amalgamate (t : IsSheafFor P R) (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(hx : x.Compatible) : P.obj (op X) :=
(t x hx).exists.choose
theorem IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation (t : IsSheafFor P R) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(hx : x.Compatible) : x.IsAmalgamation (t.amalgamate x hx) :=
(t x hx).exists.choose_spec
@[simp]
theorem IsSheafFor.valid_glue (t : IsSheafFor P R) {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible)
(f : Y ⟶ X) (Hf : R f) : P.map f.op (t.amalgamate x hx) = x f Hf :=
t.isAmalgamation hx f Hf
/-- C2.1.3 in [Elephant] -/
theorem isSheafFor_iff_generate (R : Presieve X) :
IsSheafFor P R ↔ IsSheafFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
rw [← isSeparatedFor_iff_generate]
apply and_congr (Iff.refl _)
constructor
· intro q x hx
apply Exists.imp _ (q _ (hx.restrict (le_generate R)))
intro t ht
simpa [hx] using isAmalgamation_sieveExtend _ _ ht
· intro q x hx
apply Exists.imp _ (q _ hx.sieveExtend)
intro t ht
simpa [hx] using isAmalgamation_restrict (le_generate R) _ _ ht
/-- Every presheaf is a sheaf for the family {𝟙 X}.
[Elephant] C2.1.5(i)
-/
theorem isSheafFor_singleton_iso (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSheafFor P (Presieve.singleton (𝟙 X)) := by
intro x _
refine ⟨x _ (Presieve.singleton_self _), ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp
· intro t ht
simpa using ht _ (Presieve.singleton_self _)
/-- Every presheaf is a sheaf for the maximal sieve.
[Elephant] C2.1.5(ii)
-/
theorem isSheafFor_top_sieve (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSheafFor P ((⊤ : Sieve X) : Presieve X) := by
rw [← generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (𝟙 X)]
rw [← isSheafFor_iff_generate]
apply isSheafFor_singleton_iso
/-- If `P₁ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w` and `P₂ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w` are two naturally equivalent
presheaves, and `P₁` is a sheaf for a presieve `R`, then `P₂` is also a sheaf for `R`. -/
lemma isSheafFor_of_nat_equiv {P₁ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} {P₂ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w'}
(e : ∀ ⦃X : C⦄, P₁.obj (op X) ≃ P₂.obj (op X))
(he : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : P₁.obj (op Y)),
e (P₁.map f.op x) = P₂.map f.op (e x))
{X : C} {R : Presieve X} (hP₁ : IsSheafFor P₁ R) :
IsSheafFor P₂ R := fun x₂ hx₂ ↦ by
have he' : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : P₂.obj (op Y)),
e.symm (P₂.map f.op x) = P₁.map f.op (e.symm x) := fun X Y f x ↦
e.injective (by simp only [Equiv.apply_symm_apply, he])
let x₁ : FamilyOfElements P₁ R := fun Y f hf ↦ e.symm (x₂ f hf)
have hx₁ : x₁.Compatible := fun Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ fac ↦ e.injective
(by simp only [he, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, hx₂ g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ fac, x₁])
have : ∀ (t₂ : P₂.obj (op X)),
x₂.IsAmalgamation t₂ ↔ x₁.IsAmalgamation (e.symm t₂) := fun t₂ ↦ by
simp only [FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation, x₁,
← he', EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
refine ⟨e (hP₁.amalgamate x₁ hx₁), ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp
simp only [this, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
exact IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation hP₁ hx₁
· intro t₂ ht₂
refine e.symm.injective ?_
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
exact hP₁.isSeparatedFor x₁ _ _ (by simpa only [this] using ht₂)
(IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation hP₁ hx₁)
/-- If `P` is a sheaf for `S`, and it is iso to `P'`, then `P'` is a sheaf for `S`. This shows that
"being a sheaf for a presieve" is a mathematical or hygienic property.
-/
theorem isSheafFor_iso {P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (i : P ≅ P') (hP : IsSheafFor P R) :
IsSheafFor P' R :=
isSheafFor_of_nat_equiv (fun X ↦ (i.app (op X)).toEquiv)
(fun _ _ f x ↦ congr_fun (i.hom.naturality f.op) x) hP
/-- If a presieve `R` on `X` has a subsieve `S` such that:
* `P` is a sheaf for `S`.
* For every `f` in `R`, `P` is separated for the pullback of `S` along `f`,
then `P` is a sheaf for `R`.
This is closely related to [Elephant] C2.1.6(i).
-/
theorem isSheafFor_subsieve_aux (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
(h : (S : Presieve X) ≤ R) (hS : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(trans : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, R f → IsSeparatedFor P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y)) :
IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
constructor
· intro x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
exact
hS.isSeparatedFor _ _ _ (isAmalgamation_restrict h x t₁ ht₁)
(isAmalgamation_restrict h x t₂ ht₂)
· intro x hx
use hS.amalgamate _ (hx.restrict h)
intro W j hj
apply (trans hj).ext
intro Y f hf
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hS.valid_glue (hx.restrict h) _ hf,
FamilyOfElements.restrict, ← hx (𝟙 _) f (h _ hf) _ (id_comp _)]
simp
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for every pullback of the sieve `S`, then `P` is a sheaf for any presieve which
contains `S`.
This is closely related to [Elephant] C2.1.6.
-/
theorem isSheafFor_subsieve (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
(h : (S : Presieve X) ≤ R) (trans : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X),
IsSheafFor P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y)) :
IsSheafFor P R :=
isSheafFor_subsieve_aux P h (by simpa using trans (𝟙 _)) fun _ f _ => (trans f).isSeparatedFor
section Arrows
variable {B : C} {I : Type*} {X : I → C} (π : (i : I) → X i ⟶ B) (P)
/--
A more explicit version of `FamilyOfElements.Compatible` for a `Presieve.ofArrows`.
-/
def Arrows.Compatible (x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))) : Prop :=
∀ i j Z (gi : Z ⟶ X i) (gj : Z ⟶ X j), gi ≫ π i = gj ≫ π j →
P.map gi.op (x i) = P.map gj.op (x j)
lemma FamilyOfElements.isAmalgamation_iff_ofArrows (x : FamilyOfElements P (ofArrows X π))
(t : P.obj (op B)) :
x.IsAmalgamation t ↔ ∀ (i : I), P.map (π i).op t = x _ (ofArrows.mk i) :=
⟨fun h i ↦ h _ (ofArrows.mk i), fun h _ f ⟨i⟩ ↦ h i⟩
namespace Arrows.Compatible
variable {x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))}
variable {P π}
theorem exists_familyOfElements (hx : Compatible P π x) :
∃ (x' : FamilyOfElements P (ofArrows X π)), ∀ (i : I), x' _ (ofArrows.mk i) = x i := by
choose i h h' using @ofArrows_surj _ _ _ _ _ π
exact ⟨fun Y f hf ↦ P.map (eqToHom (h f hf).symm).op (x _),
fun j ↦ (hx _ j (X j) _ (𝟙 _) <| by rw [← h', id_comp]).trans <| by simp⟩
variable (hx : Compatible P π x)
/--
A `FamilyOfElements` associated to an explicit family of elements.
-/
noncomputable
def familyOfElements : FamilyOfElements P (ofArrows X π) :=
(exists_familyOfElements hx).choose
@[simp]
theorem familyOfElements_ofArrows_mk (i : I) :
hx.familyOfElements _ (ofArrows.mk i) = x i :=
(exists_familyOfElements hx).choose_spec _
theorem familyOfElements_compatible : hx.familyOfElements.Compatible := by
rintro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ hgf
simp [hx i j Z g₁ g₂ hgf]
end Arrows.Compatible
theorem isSheafFor_arrows_iff : (ofArrows X π).IsSheafFor P ↔
(∀ (x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))), Arrows.Compatible P π x →
∃! t, ∀ i, P.map (π i).op t = x i) := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := h _ hx.familyOfElements_compatible
refine ⟨t, fun i ↦ ?_, fun t' ht' ↦ ht₂ _ fun _ _ ⟨i⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [ht₁ _ (ofArrows.mk i), hx.familyOfElements_ofArrows_mk]
· rw [ht', hx.familyOfElements_ofArrows_mk]
· obtain ⟨t, hA, ht⟩ := h (fun i ↦ x (π i) (ofArrows.mk _))
(fun i j Z gi gj ↦ hx gi gj (ofArrows.mk _) (ofArrows.mk _))
exact ⟨t, fun Y f ⟨i⟩ ↦ hA i, fun y hy ↦ ht y (fun i ↦ hy (π i) (ofArrows.mk _))⟩
variable [(ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks]
/--
A more explicit version of `FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible` for a `Presieve.ofArrows`.
-/
def Arrows.PullbackCompatible (x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))) : Prop :=
∀ i j, P.map (pullback.fst (π i) (π j)).op (x i) =
P.map (pullback.snd (π i) (π j)).op (x j)
theorem Arrows.pullbackCompatible_iff (x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))) :
Compatible P π x ↔ PullbackCompatible P π x := by
refine ⟨fun t i j ↦ ?_, fun t i j Z gi gj comm ↦ ?_⟩
· apply t
exact pullback.condition
· rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t i j,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
theorem isSheafFor_arrows_iff_pullbacks : (ofArrows X π).IsSheafFor P ↔
| (∀ (x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))), Arrows.PullbackCompatible P π x →
∃! t, ∀ i, P.map (π i).op t = x i) := by
simp_rw [← Arrows.pullbackCompatible_iff, isSheafFor_arrows_iff]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 757 | 759 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
| theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 896 | 897 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
/-!
# Growth estimates on `x ^ y` for complex `x`, `y`
Let `l` be a filter on `ℂ` such that `Complex.re` tends to infinity along `l` and `Complex.im z`
grows at a subexponential rate compared to `Complex.re z`. Then
- `Complex.isLittleO_log_abs_re`: `Real.log ∘ Complex.abs` is `o`-small of
`Complex.re` along `l`;
- `Complex.isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp`: $z^{a_1}e^{b_1 * z} = o\left(z^{a_1}e^{b_1 * z}\right)$
along `l` for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and real `b₁ < b₂`.
We use these assumptions on `l` for two reasons. First, these are the assumptions that naturally
appear in the proof. Second, in some applications (e.g., in Ilyashenko's proof of the individual
finiteness theorem for limit cycles of polynomial ODEs with hyperbolic singularities only) natural
stronger assumptions (e.g., `im z` is bounded from below and from above) are not available.
-/
open Asymptotics Filter Function
open scoped Topology
namespace Complex
/-- We say that `l : Filter ℂ` is an *exponential comparison filter* if the real part tends to
infinity along `l` and the imaginary part grows subexponentially compared to the real part. These
properties guarantee that `(fun z ↦ z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z))`
for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and real `b₁ < b₂`.
In particular, the second property is automatically satisfied if the imaginary part is bounded along
`l`. -/
structure IsExpCmpFilter (l : Filter ℂ) : Prop where
tendsto_re : Tendsto re l atTop
isBigO_im_pow_re : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =O[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re
namespace IsExpCmpFilter
variable {l : Filter ℂ}
/-!
### Alternative constructors
-/
theorem of_isBigO_im_re_rpow (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (r : ℝ) (hr : im =O[l] fun z => z.re ^ r) :
IsExpCmpFilter l :=
⟨hre, fun n =>
IsLittleO.isBigO <|
calc
(fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =O[l] fun z => (z.re ^ r) ^ n := hr.pow n
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => z.re ^ (r * n) :=
((hre.eventually_ge_atTop 0).mono fun z hz => by
simp only [Real.rpow_mul hz r n, Real.rpow_natCast])
_ =o[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re := (isLittleO_rpow_exp_atTop _).comp_tendsto hre ⟩
theorem of_isBigO_im_re_pow (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (n : ℕ) (hr : im =O[l] fun z => z.re ^ n) :
IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_isBigO_im_re_rpow hre n <| mod_cast hr
theorem of_boundedUnder_abs_im (hre : Tendsto re l atTop)
(him : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun z => |z.im|) : IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_isBigO_im_re_pow hre 0 <| by
simpa only [pow_zero] using him.isBigO_const (f := im) one_ne_zero
theorem of_boundedUnder_im (hre : Tendsto re l atTop) (him_le : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l im)
(him_ge : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l im) : IsExpCmpFilter l :=
of_boundedUnder_abs_im hre <| isBoundedUnder_le_abs.2 ⟨him_le, him_ge⟩
/-!
### Preliminary lemmas
-/
theorem eventually_ne (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : ∀ᶠ w : ℂ in l, w ≠ 0 :=
hl.tendsto_re.eventually_ne_atTop' _
theorem tendsto_abs_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : Tendsto (fun z : ℂ => |z.re|) l atTop :=
tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop.comp hl.tendsto_re
theorem tendsto_norm (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : Tendsto norm l atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono abs_re_le_norm hl.tendsto_abs_re
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias tendsto_abs := tendsto_norm
theorem isLittleO_log_re_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : (fun z => Real.log z.re) =o[l] re :=
Real.isLittleO_log_id_atTop.comp_tendsto hl.tendsto_re
theorem isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (n : ℕ) :
(fun z : ℂ => z.im ^ n) =o[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re :=
flip IsLittleO.of_pow two_ne_zero <|
calc
(fun z : ℂ ↦ (z.im ^ n) ^ 2) = (fun z ↦ z.im ^ (2 * n)) := by simp only [pow_mul']
_ =O[l] fun z ↦ Real.exp z.re := hl.isBigO_im_pow_re _
_ = fun z ↦ (Real.exp z.re) ^ 1 := by simp only [pow_one]
_ =o[l] fun z ↦ (Real.exp z.re) ^ 2 :=
(isLittleO_pow_pow_atTop_of_lt one_lt_two).comp_tendsto <|
Real.tendsto_exp_atTop.comp hl.tendsto_re
theorem abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (n : ℕ) :
(fun z : ℂ => |z.im| ^ n) ≤ᶠ[l] fun z => Real.exp z.re := by
simpa using (hl.isLittleO_im_pow_exp_re n).bound zero_lt_one
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then $\log |z| =o(ℜ z)$ along `l`.
This is the main lemma in the proof of `Complex.IsExpCmpFilter.isLittleO_cpow_exp` below.
-/
theorem isLittleO_log_norm_re (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) : (fun z => Real.log ‖z‖) =o[l] re :=
calc
(fun z => Real.log ‖z‖) =O[l] fun z => Real.log (√2) + Real.log (max z.re |z.im|) :=
.of_norm_eventuallyLE <|
(hl.tendsto_re.eventually_ge_atTop 1).mono fun z hz => by
have h2 : 0 < √2 := by simp
have hz' : 1 ≤ ‖z‖ := hz.trans (re_le_norm z)
have hm₀ : 0 < max z.re |z.im| := lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| one_pos.trans_le hz)
simp only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (Real.log_nonneg hz')]
rw [← Real.log_mul, Real.log_le_log_iff, ← abs_of_nonneg (le_trans zero_le_one hz)]
exacts [norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_max z, one_pos.trans_le hz', mul_pos h2 hm₀, h2.ne', hm₀.ne']
_ =o[l] re :=
IsLittleO.add (isLittleO_const_left.2 <| Or.inr <| hl.tendsto_abs_re) <|
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le.2 fun n => by
filter_upwards [isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'.1 hl.isLittleO_log_re_re n,
hl.abs_im_pow_eventuallyLE_exp_re n,
hl.tendsto_re.eventually_gt_atTop 1] with z hre him h₁
rcases le_total |z.im| z.re with hle | hle
· rwa [max_eq_left hle]
· have H : 1 < |z.im| := h₁.trans_le hle
norm_cast at *
rwa [max_eq_right hle, Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos (Real.log_pos H),
← Real.log_pow, Real.log_le_iff_le_exp (pow_pos (one_pos.trans H) _),
abs_of_pos (one_pos.trans h₁)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias isLittleO_log_abs_re := isLittleO_log_norm_re
/-!
### Main results
-/
lemma isTheta_cpow_exp_re_mul_log (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) :
(· ^ a) =Θ[l] fun z ↦ Real.exp (re a * Real.log ‖z‖) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a) =Θ[l] (fun z : ℂ => ‖z‖ ^ re a) :=
isTheta_cpow_const_rpow fun _ _ => hl.eventually_ne
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => Real.exp (re a * Real.log ‖z‖) :=
(hl.eventually_ne.mono fun z hz => by simp
[Real.rpow_def_of_pos, norm_pos_iff.mpr hz, mul_comm])
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a` and any
positive real `b`, we have `(fun z ↦ z ^ a) =o[l] (fun z ↦ exp (b * z))`. -/
theorem isLittleO_cpow_exp (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun z => z ^ a) =o[l] fun z => exp (b * z) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a) =Θ[l] fun z => Real.exp (re a * Real.log ‖z‖) :=
hl.isTheta_cpow_exp_re_mul_log a
_ =o[l] fun z => exp (b * z) :=
IsLittleO.of_norm_right <| by
simp only [norm_exp, re_ofReal_mul, Real.isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
refine (IsEquivalent.refl.sub_isLittleO ?_).symm.tendsto_atTop
(hl.tendsto_re.const_mul_atTop hb)
exact (hl.isLittleO_log_norm_re.const_mul_left _).const_mul_right hb.ne'
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and any
real `b₁ < b₂`, we have `(fun z ↦ z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z))`. -/
theorem isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp {b₁ b₂ : ℝ} (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (hb : b₁ < b₂) (a₁ a₂ : ℂ) :
(fun z => z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z) :=
calc
(fun z => z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =ᶠ[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z) * z ^ (a₁ - a₂) :=
hl.eventually_ne.mono fun z hz => by
simp only
rw [mul_right_comm, ← cpow_add _ _ hz, add_sub_cancel]
_ =o[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z) * exp (↑(b₂ - b₁) * z) :=
((isBigO_refl (fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₁ * z)) l).mul_isLittleO <|
hl.isLittleO_cpow_exp _ (sub_pos.2 hb))
_ =ᶠ[l] fun z => z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z) := by
simp only [ofReal_sub, sub_mul, mul_assoc, ← exp_add, add_sub_cancel]
norm_cast
|
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a` and any
negative real `b`, we have `(fun z ↦ exp (b * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a)`. -/
theorem isLittleO_exp_cpow (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (a : ℂ) {b : ℝ} (hb : b < 0) :
(fun z => exp (b * z)) =o[l] fun z => z ^ a := by simpa using hl.isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp hb 0 a
/-- If `l : Filter ℂ` is an "exponential comparison filter", then for any complex `a₁`, `a₂` and any
natural `b₁ < b₂`, we have
`(fun z ↦ z ^ a₁ * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] (fun z ↦ z ^ a₂ * exp (b₂ * z))`. -/
theorem isLittleO_pow_mul_exp {b₁ b₂ : ℝ} (hl : IsExpCmpFilter l) (hb : b₁ < b₂) (m n : ℕ) :
(fun z => z ^ m * exp (b₁ * z)) =o[l] fun z => z ^ n * exp (b₂ * z) := by
simpa only [cpow_natCast] using hl.isLittleO_cpow_mul_exp hb m n
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/CompareExp.lean | 183 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FunProp.Attr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Measurability
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file defines measurable spaces and measurable functions.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function
-/
assert_not_exists Covariant MonoidWithZero
open Set Encodable Function Equiv
variable {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {s t u : Set α}
/-- A measurable space is a space equipped with a σ-algebra. -/
@[class] structure MeasurableSpace (α : Type*) where
/-- Predicate saying that a given set is measurable. Use `MeasurableSet` in the root namespace
instead. -/
MeasurableSet' : Set α → Prop
/-- The empty set is a measurable set. Use `MeasurableSet.empty` instead. -/
measurableSet_empty : MeasurableSet' ∅
/-- The complement of a measurable set is a measurable set. Use `MeasurableSet.compl` instead. -/
measurableSet_compl : ∀ s, MeasurableSet' s → MeasurableSet' sᶜ
/-- The union of a sequence of measurable sets is a measurable set. Use a more general
`MeasurableSet.iUnion` instead. -/
measurableSet_iUnion : ∀ f : ℕ → Set α, (∀ i, MeasurableSet' (f i)) → MeasurableSet' (⋃ i, f i)
instance [h : MeasurableSpace α] : MeasurableSpace αᵒᵈ := h
/-- `MeasurableSet s` means that `s` is measurable (in the ambient measure space on `α`) -/
def MeasurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] (s : Set α) : Prop :=
‹MeasurableSpace α›.MeasurableSet' s
/-- Notation for `MeasurableSet` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra. -/
scoped[MeasureTheory] notation "MeasurableSet[" m "]" => @MeasurableSet _ m
open MeasureTheory
section
open scoped symmDiff
@[simp, measurability]
theorem MeasurableSet.empty [MeasurableSpace α] : MeasurableSet (∅ : Set α) :=
MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_empty _
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.compl : MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet sᶜ :=
MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_compl _ s
protected theorem MeasurableSet.of_compl (h : MeasurableSet sᶜ) : MeasurableSet s :=
compl_compl s ▸ h.compl
@[simp]
theorem MeasurableSet.compl_iff : MeasurableSet sᶜ ↔ MeasurableSet s :=
⟨.of_compl, .compl⟩
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.univ : MeasurableSet (univ : Set α) :=
.of_compl <| by simp
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurableSet [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} : MeasurableSet s :=
Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
theorem MeasurableSet.congr {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : s = t) : MeasurableSet t := by
rwa [← h]
@[measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.iUnion [Countable ι] ⦃f : ι → Set α⦄
(h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b, f b) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp
· rcases exists_surjective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
rw [← iUnion_congr_of_surjective _ he (fun _ => rfl)]
exact m.measurableSet_iUnion _ fun _ => h _
protected theorem MeasurableSet.biUnion {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
have := hs.to_subtype
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (by simpa using h)
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_biUnion {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
.biUnion hs.countable h
theorem Finset.measurableSet_biUnion {f : β → Set α} (s : Finset β)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) :=
s.finite_toSet.measurableSet_biUnion h
protected theorem MeasurableSet.sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]
exact .biUnion hs h
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (⋃₀ s) :=
MeasurableSet.sUnion hs.countable h
@[measurability]
theorem MeasurableSet.iInter [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ b, MeasurableSet (f b)) :
MeasurableSet (⋂ b, f b) :=
.of_compl <| by rw [compl_iInter]; exact .iUnion fun b => (h b).compl
theorem MeasurableSet.biInter {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
.of_compl <| by rw [compl_iInter₂]; exact .biUnion hs fun b hb => (h b hb).compl
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_biInter {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
.biInter hs.countable h
theorem Finset.measurableSet_biInter {f : β → Set α} (s : Finset β)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : MeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) :=
s.finite_toSet.measurableSet_biInter h
theorem MeasurableSet.sInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) :
MeasurableSet (⋂₀ s) := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
exact MeasurableSet.biInter hs h
theorem Set.Finite.measurableSet_sInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet t) : MeasurableSet (⋂₀ s) :=
MeasurableSet.sInter hs.countable h
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.union {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]
exact .iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.inter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl]
exact (h₁.compl.union h₂.compl).compl
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.diff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ \ s₂) :=
h₁.inter h₂.compl
@[simp, measurability]
protected lemma MeasurableSet.himp {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) :
MeasurableSet (s₁ ⇨ s₂) := by rw [himp_eq]; exact h₂.union h₁.compl
@[simp, measurability]
protected theorem MeasurableSet.symmDiff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ∆ s₂) :=
(h₁.diff h₂).union (h₂.diff h₁)
@[simp, measurability]
protected lemma MeasurableSet.bihimp {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁)
(h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (s₁ ⇔ s₂) := (h₂.himp h₁).inter (h₁.himp h₂)
@[simp, measurability]
| protected theorem MeasurableSet.ite {t s₁ s₂ : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) : MeasurableSet (t.ite s₁ s₂) :=
(h₁.inter ht).union (h₂.diff ht)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean | 189 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.empty : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' ∅ x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.empty : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f ∅ x :=
⟨0, .empty⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact .empty
| insert _ _ ih => exact ih.insert'
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨0, .of_finite h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.singleton {y} : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' {x} y :=
.of_finite <| finite_singleton _
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.singleton {y} : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f {x} y :=
⟨0, .singleton⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
hf.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_comp _ _)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
h.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_sub _ _)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| by
simpa only using hf.isLittleOTVS.comp_tendsto (tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds)
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.differentiableAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'` and `K > ‖f'‖₊`, then `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f'‖₊ < K) : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
have := hf.isLittleO.add_isBigOWith (f'.isBigOWith_comp _ _) hK
simp only [sub_add_cancel, IsBigOWith] at this
rcases exists_nhds_square this with ⟨U, Uo, xU, hU⟩
exact
⟨U, Uo.mem_nhds xU, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun x hx y hy => hU (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a
neighborhood of `x`. See also `HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt` for a
more precise statement. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
∃ K, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
(exists_gt _).imp hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `HasFDeriv`. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.lim (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
refine (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 hf).lim _ univ_mem hc ?_
intro U hU
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc (0 : 𝕜)).mono fun y hy => ?_
convert mem_of_mem_nhds hU
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_smul]
theorem HasFDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasFDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ.eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(ht : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union]
exact .of_isLittleOTVS <| hs.isLittleOTVS.sup ht.isLittleOTVS
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp fun _ hf' => hf'.hasFDerivAt hs
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot] at h
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton x, HasFDerivWithinAt, h,
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact .bot
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
@[deprecated HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt <| by rwa [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot]
/-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-20")]
alias hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure := HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_not_accPt h)]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot h)]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 :=
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) s x := by
simp only [fderivWithin, dif_pos h]
split_ifs with h₀
exacts [h₀, Classical.choose_spec h]
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x := by
rw [fderiv, ← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ]
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x :=
((h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hs)).differentiableAt hs).hasFDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.eventually_differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f y :=
(eventually_eventually_nhds.2 hs).mono fun _ => h.differentiableAt
protected theorem HasFDerivAt.fderiv (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = f' := by
ext
rw [h.unique h.differentiableAt.hasFDerivAt]
theorem fderiv_eq {f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F} (h : ∀ x, HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x) : fderiv 𝕜 f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).fderiv
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = f' :=
(hxs.eq h h.differentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt).symm
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases h with ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact ⟨f', hf'.mono st⟩
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E} (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).differentiableWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem := DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set E} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert_self :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert x s), fun h ↦ h.hasFDerivWithinAt.insert.differentiableWithinAt⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert y s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact differentiableWithinAt_insert_self
apply differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds
exact nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h
alias ⟨DifferentiableWithinAt.of_insert, DifferentiableWithinAt.insert'⟩ :=
differentiableWithinAt_insert
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.insert (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
theorem DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(differentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.differentiableAt (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h x
protected theorem DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin hxs
theorem DifferentiableOn.mono (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f t) (st : s ⊆ t) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem differentiableOn_univ : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f univ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [DifferentiableOn, Differentiable, differentiableWithinAt_univ, mem_univ,
forall_true_left]
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.differentiableOn (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
(differentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem differentiableOn_of_locally_differentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f (s ∩ u)) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (differentiableWithinAt_inter (IsOpen.mem_nhds t_open xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem fderivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin (st : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x :=
((DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin st).fderivWithin ht
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias fderivWithin_of_mem := fderivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem fderivWithin_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x :=
fderivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ st self_mem_nhdsWithin) ht h
theorem fderivWithin_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
simp [fderivWithin, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter ht, DifferentiableWithinAt]
theorem fderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← univ_inter s, fderivWithin_inter h]
theorem fderivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
fderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
theorem fderivWithin_eq_fderiv (hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ]
exact fderivWithin_subset (subset_univ _) hs h.differentiableWithinAt
theorem fderiv_mem_iff {f : E → F} {s : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {x : E} : fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s ∨ ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x <;> simp [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt, *]
theorem fderivWithin_mem_iff {f : E → F} {t : Set E} {s : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {x : E} :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x ∈ s ∨
¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x <;>
simp [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, *]
theorem Asymptotics.IsBigO.hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set E} {x₀ : E} {n : ℕ}
(h : f =O[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hn : 1 < n) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x₀ := by
simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO,
h.eq_zero_of_norm_pow_within hx₀ hn.ne_bot, zero_apply, sub_zero,
h.trans_isLittleO ((isLittleO_pow_sub_sub x₀ hn).mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds)]
theorem Asymptotics.IsBigO.hasFDerivAt {x₀ : E} {n : ℕ} (h : f =O[𝓝 x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n)
(hn : 1 < n) : HasFDerivAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x₀ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at h
exact (h.hasFDerivWithinAt (mem_univ _) hn).hasFDerivAt_of_univ
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x₀ : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x₀) : (f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝[s] x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.isBigO_sub
lemma DifferentiableWithinAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x₀ : E}
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x₀) : (f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝[s] x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {x₀ : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
(h : HasFDerivAt f f' x₀) : (f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝 x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem DifferentiableAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {x₀ : E} (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x₀) :
(f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝 x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.hasFDerivAt.isBigO_sub
end FDerivProperties
section Continuous
/-! ### Deducing continuity from differentiability -/
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
Tendsto f L (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have : Tendsto (fun x' => f x' - f x) L (𝓝 0) := by
refine h.isBigO_sub.trans_tendsto (Tendsto.mono_left ?_ hL)
rw [← sub_self x]
exact tendsto_id.sub tendsto_const_nhds
have := this.add (tendsto_const_nhds (x := f x))
rw [zero_add (f x)] at this
exact this.congr (by simp only [sub_add_cancel, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const])
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds inf_le_left h
theorem HasFDerivAt.continuousAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds le_rfl h
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
let ⟨_, hf'⟩ := h
hf'.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.continuousAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
let ⟨_, hf'⟩ := h
hf'.continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.continuous (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.continuousAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.continuousAt
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub_rev {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F}
(hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) x) :
(fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 :=
((f'.isBigO_comp_rev _ _).trans
(hf.isLittleO.trans_isBigO (f'.isBigO_comp_rev _ _)).right_isBigO_add).congr
(fun _ => rfl) fun _ => sub_add_cancel _ _
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) {C}
(hf' : AntilipschitzWith C f') : (fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
have : (fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f' (x' - x) :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨C, Eventually.of_forall fun _ => ZeroHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz f' hf' _⟩
(this.trans (hf.isLittleO.trans_isBigO this).right_isBigO_add).congr (fun _ => rfl) fun _ =>
sub_add_cancel _ _
end Continuous
section congr
/-! ### congr properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
calc
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x :=
(hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _).symm
_ ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (t \ {y}) x := by
suffices 𝓝[s \ {y}] x = 𝓝[t \ {y}] x by simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, this]
simpa only [set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal, ← nhdsWithin_inter', diff_eq,
inter_comm] using h
_ ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x := hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' x <| h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
exists_congr fun _ => hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' _ h
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
exists_congr fun _ => hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
theorem fderivWithin_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x := by
classical
simp only [fderivWithin, differentiableWithinAt_congr_set' _ h, hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' _ h]
theorem fderivWithin_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x :=
fderivWithin_congr_set' x <| h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem fderivWithin_eventually_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f t :=
(eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).mono fun _ => fderivWithin_congr_set' y
theorem fderivWithin_eventually_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f t :=
fderivWithin_eventually_congr_set' x <| h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasStrictFDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) (h' : ∀ y, f₀' y = f₁' y) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f₀ f₀' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f₁ f₁' x := by
rw [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS, hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
refine isLittleOTVS_congr ((h.prodMk_nhds h).mono ?_) .rfl
rintro p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩
simp only [*]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_fderiv (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasStrictFDerivAt f g' x :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasFDerivAt.congr_fderiv (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') : HasFDerivAt f g' x :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_fderiv (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasFDerivWithinAt f g' s x :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) : HasStrictFDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
(h₁.hasStrictFDerivAt_iff fun _ => rfl).1 h
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff (h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x)
(h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) : HasFDerivAtFilter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f₁ f₁' x L := by
simp only [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact isLittleOTVS_congr (h₀.mono fun y hy => by simp only [hy, h₁, hx]) .rfl
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[L] f)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasFDerivAtFilter f₁ f' x L :=
(hL.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx fun _ => rfl).2 h
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
HasFDerivAt f₀ f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff h.eq_of_nhds fun _ => _root_.rfl
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.differentiableAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₀ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₁ x :=
exists_congr fun _ => h.hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f₀ f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx fun _ => _root_.rfl
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f₀ f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff (h.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.differentiableWithinAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
exists_congr fun _ => h.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff hx
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.differentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : x ∈ s) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
h.differentiableWithinAt_iff (h.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : EqOn f₁ f t)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' t x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h.mono h₁) (Filter.mem_inf_of_right ht) hx
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : EqOn f₁ f s)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr' (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr hs (hs hx)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ hx
theorem HasFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
HasFDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhds h₁ :)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (ht : EqOn f₁ f t)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ t x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasFDerivWithinAt ht hx h₁).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (ht : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono h ht hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h₁ :)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
(h.insert.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁ (mem_insert _ _)).of_insert
theorem DifferentiableOn.congr_mono (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (h' : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(h₁ : t ⊆ s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₁ t := fun x hx => (h x (h₁ hx)).congr_mono h' (h' x hx) h₁
theorem DifferentiableOn.congr (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (h' : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₁ s := fun x hx => (h x hx).congr h' (h' x hx)
theorem differentiableOn_congr (h' : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₁ s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => DifferentiableOn.congr h fun y hy => (h' y hy).symm, fun h =>
DifferentiableOn.congr h h'⟩
theorem DifferentiableAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₁ x :=
hL.differentiableAt_iff.2 h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.fderivWithin_congr_mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : EqOn f₁ f t) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (hxt : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 t x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ t x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasFDerivWithinAt hs hx h₁).fderivWithin hxt
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
simp only [fderivWithin, DifferentiableWithinAt, hs.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff hx]
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq_of_mem (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
hs.fderivWithin_eq (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx hs :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq_of_insert (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
apply Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert x s) hs)
exact (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) hs :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin' (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (ht : t ⊆ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ t =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f t :=
(eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin.2 hs).mp <|
eventually_mem_nhdsWithin.mono fun _y hys hs =>
EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq (hs.filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ ht)
(hs.self_of_nhdsWithin hys)
protected theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f s :=
hs.fderivWithin' Subset.rfl
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq_nhds (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds).fderivWithin_eq h.self_of_nhds
theorem fderivWithin_congr (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(hs.eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right).fderivWithin_eq hx
theorem fderivWithin_congr' (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_congr hs (hs hx)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderiv_eq (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : fderiv 𝕜 f₁ x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ, h.fderivWithin_eq_nhds]
protected theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderiv (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : fderiv 𝕜 f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fderiv 𝕜 f :=
h.eventuallyEq_nhds.mono fun _ h => h.fderiv_eq
end congr
section id
/-! ### Derivative of the identity -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_id (x : E) : HasStrictFDerivAt id (id 𝕜 E) x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left <| by simp
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_id (x : E) (L : Filter E) : HasFDerivAtFilter id (id 𝕜 E) x L :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left <| by simp
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_id (x : E) (s : Set E) : HasFDerivWithinAt id (id 𝕜 E) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_id _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_id (x : E) : HasFDerivAt id (id 𝕜 E) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_id _ _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_id : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 id x :=
(hasFDerivAt_id x).differentiableAt
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_id' : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => x) x :=
(hasFDerivAt_id x).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_id : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 id s x :=
differentiableAt_id.differentiableWithinAt
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_id' : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => x) s x :=
differentiableWithinAt_id
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiable_id : Differentiable 𝕜 (id : E → E) := fun _ => differentiableAt_id
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_id' : Differentiable 𝕜 fun x : E => x := fun _ => differentiableAt_id
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableOn_id : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 id s :=
differentiable_id.differentiableOn
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_id : fderiv 𝕜 id x = id 𝕜 E :=
HasFDerivAt.fderiv (hasFDerivAt_id x)
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_id' : fderiv 𝕜 (fun x : E => x) x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E :=
fderiv_id
theorem fderivWithin_id (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 id s x = id 𝕜 E := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin differentiableAt_id hxs]
exact fderiv_id
theorem fderivWithin_id' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x : E => x) s x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E :=
fderivWithin_id hxs
end id
section Const
/-! ### Derivative of constant functions
This include the constant functions `0`, `1`, `Nat.cast n`, `Int.cast z`, and other numerals.
-/
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_const (c : F) (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [zero_apply, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_zero (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_one [One F] (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_const (c : F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [zero_apply, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_zero (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L := hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_one [One F] (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L := hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_const (c : F) (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_zero (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x := hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_one [One F] (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x := hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_const (c : F) (x : E) : HasFDerivAt (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_zero (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_one [One F] (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_const (c : F) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun _ => c) x :=
⟨0, hasFDerivAt_const c x⟩
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_zero (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (0 : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_one [One F] (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (1 : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (n : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (z : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp low, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (ofNat(n) : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[fun_prop]
| theorem differentiableWithinAt_const (c : F) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun _ => c) s x :=
DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt (differentiableAt_const _)
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 1,192 | 1,195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
/-!
# The W construction as a multivariate polynomial functor.
W types are well-founded tree-like structures. They are defined
as the least fixpoint of a polynomial functor.
## Main definitions
* `W_mk` - constructor
* `W_dest - destructor
* `W_rec` - recursor: basis for defining functions by structural recursion on `P.W α`
* `W_rec_eq` - defining equation for `W_rec`
* `W_ind` - induction principle for `P.W α`
## Implementation notes
Three views of M-types:
* `wp`: polynomial functor
* `W`: data type inductively defined by a triple:
shape of the root, data in the root and children of the root
* `W`: least fixed point of a polynomial functor
Specifically, we define the polynomial functor `wp` as:
* A := a tree-like structure without information in the nodes
* B := given the tree-like structure `t`, `B t` is a valid path
(specified inductively by `W_path`) from the root of `t` to any given node.
As a result `wp α` is made of a dataless tree and a function from
its valid paths to values of `α`
## Reference
* Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon.
[*Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u v
namespace MvPFunctor
open TypeVec
open MvFunctor
variable {n : ℕ} (P : MvPFunctor.{u} (n + 1))
/-- A path from the root of a tree to one of its node -/
inductive WPath : P.last.W → Fin2 n → Type u
| root (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (i : Fin2 n) (c : P.drop.B a i) : WPath ⟨a, f⟩ i
| child (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (i : Fin2 n) (j : P.last.B a)
(c : WPath (f j) i) : WPath ⟨a, f⟩ i
instance WPath.inhabited (x : P.last.W) {i} [I : Inhabited (P.drop.B x.head i)] :
Inhabited (WPath P x i) :=
⟨match x, I with
| ⟨a, f⟩, I => WPath.root a f i (@default _ I)⟩
/-- Specialized destructor on `WPath` -/
def wPathCasesOn {α : TypeVec n} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W} (g' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α)
(g : ∀ j : P.last.B a, P.WPath (f j) ⟹ α) : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α := by
intro i x
match x with
| WPath.root _ _ i c => exact g' i c
| WPath.child _ _ i j c => exact g j i c
/-- Specialized destructor on `WPath` -/
def wPathDestLeft {α : TypeVec n} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W}
(h : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α) : P.drop.B a ⟹ α := fun i c => h i (WPath.root a f i c)
/-- Specialized destructor on `WPath` -/
def wPathDestRight {α : TypeVec n} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W}
(h : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α) : ∀ j : P.last.B a, P.WPath (f j) ⟹ α := fun j i c =>
h i (WPath.child a f i j c)
theorem wPathDestLeft_wPathCasesOn {α : TypeVec n} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W}
(g' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (g : ∀ j : P.last.B a, P.WPath (f j) ⟹ α) :
P.wPathDestLeft (P.wPathCasesOn g' g) = g' := rfl
theorem wPathDestRight_wPathCasesOn {α : TypeVec n} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W}
(g' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (g : ∀ j : P.last.B a, P.WPath (f j) ⟹ α) :
P.wPathDestRight (P.wPathCasesOn g' g) = g := rfl
theorem wPathCasesOn_eta {α : TypeVec n} {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W}
(h : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α) : P.wPathCasesOn (P.wPathDestLeft h) (P.wPathDestRight h) = h := by
ext i x; cases x <;> rfl
theorem comp_wPathCasesOn {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α ⟹ β) {a : P.A} {f : P.last.B a → P.last.W}
(g' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (g : ∀ j : P.last.B a, P.WPath (f j) ⟹ α) :
h ⊚ P.wPathCasesOn g' g = P.wPathCasesOn (h ⊚ g') fun i => h ⊚ g i := by
ext i x; cases x <;> rfl
/-- Polynomial functor for the W-type of `P`. `A` is a data-less well-founded
tree whereas, for a given `a : A`, `B a` is a valid path in tree `a` so
that `Wp.obj α` is made of a tree and a function from its valid paths to
the values it contains -/
def wp : MvPFunctor n where
A := P.last.W
B := P.WPath
/-- W-type of `P` -/
def W (α : TypeVec n) : Type _ :=
P.wp α
instance mvfunctorW : MvFunctor P.W := by delta MvPFunctor.W; infer_instance
/-!
First, describe operations on `W` as a polynomial functor.
-/
/-- Constructor for `wp` -/
def wpMk {α : TypeVec n} (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (f' : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α) :
P.W α :=
⟨⟨a, f⟩, f'⟩
def wpRec {α : TypeVec n} {C : Type*}
(g : ∀ (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W), P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α → (P.last.B a → C) → C) :
∀ (x : P.last.W) (_ : P.WPath x ⟹ α), C
| ⟨a, f⟩, f' => g a f f' fun i => wpRec g (f i) (P.wPathDestRight f' i)
theorem wpRec_eq {α : TypeVec n} {C : Type*}
(g : ∀ (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W), P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α → (P.last.B a → C) → C)
(a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (f' : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α) :
P.wpRec g ⟨a, f⟩ f' = g a f f' fun i => P.wpRec g (f i) (P.wPathDestRight f' i) := rfl
-- Note: we could replace Prop by Type* and obtain a dependent recursor
theorem wp_ind {α : TypeVec n} {C : ∀ x : P.last.W, P.WPath x ⟹ α → Prop}
(ih : ∀ (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (f' : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α),
(∀ i : P.last.B a, C (f i) (P.wPathDestRight f' i)) → C ⟨a, f⟩ f') :
∀ (x : P.last.W) (f' : P.WPath x ⟹ α), C x f'
| ⟨a, f⟩, f' => ih a f f' fun _i => wp_ind ih _ _
/-!
Now think of W as defined inductively by the data ⟨a, f', f⟩ where
- `a : P.A` is the shape of the top node
- `f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α` is the contents of the top node
- `f : P.last.B a → P.last.W` are the subtrees
-/
/-- Constructor for `W` -/
def wMk {α : TypeVec n} (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : P.last.B a → P.W α) : P.W α :=
let g : P.last.B a → P.last.W := fun i => (f i).fst
let g' : P.WPath ⟨a, g⟩ ⟹ α := P.wPathCasesOn f' fun i => (f i).snd
⟨⟨a, g⟩, g'⟩
/-- Recursor for `W` -/
def wRec {α : TypeVec n} {C : Type*}
(g : ∀ a : P.A, P.drop.B a ⟹ α → (P.last.B a → P.W α) → (P.last.B a → C) → C) : P.W α → C
| ⟨a, f'⟩ =>
let g' (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (h : P.WPath ⟨a, f⟩ ⟹ α)
(h' : P.last.B a → C) : C :=
g a (P.wPathDestLeft h) (fun i => ⟨f i, P.wPathDestRight h i⟩) h'
P.wpRec g' a f'
/-- Defining equation for the recursor of `W` -/
theorem wRec_eq {α : TypeVec n} {C : Type*}
(g : ∀ a : P.A, P.drop.B a ⟹ α → (P.last.B a → P.W α) → (P.last.B a → C) → C) (a : P.A)
(f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : P.last.B a → P.W α) :
P.wRec g (P.wMk a f' f) = g a f' f fun i => P.wRec g (f i) := by
rw [wMk, wRec]; rw [wpRec_eq]
dsimp only [wPathDestLeft_wPathCasesOn, wPathDestRight_wPathCasesOn]
congr
/-- Induction principle for `W` -/
theorem w_ind {α : TypeVec n} {C : P.W α → Prop}
(ih : ∀ (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : P.last.B a → P.W α),
(∀ i, C (f i)) → C (P.wMk a f' f)) :
∀ x, C x := by
intro x; obtain ⟨a, f⟩ := x
apply @wp_ind n P α fun a f => C ⟨a, f⟩
intro a f f' ih'
dsimp [wMk] at ih
let ih'' := ih a (P.wPathDestLeft f') fun i => ⟨f i, P.wPathDestRight f' i⟩
dsimp at ih''; rw [wPathCasesOn_eta] at ih''
apply ih''
apply ih'
theorem w_cases {α : TypeVec n} {C : P.W α → Prop}
(ih : ∀ (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : P.last.B a → P.W α), C (P.wMk a f' f)) :
∀ x, C x := P.w_ind fun a f' f _ih' => ih a f' f
/-- W-types are functorial -/
def wMap {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) : P.W α → P.W β := fun x => g <$$> x
theorem wMk_eq {α : TypeVec n} (a : P.A) (f : P.last.B a → P.last.W) (g' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α)
(g : ∀ j : P.last.B a, P.WPath (f j) ⟹ α) :
(P.wMk a g' fun i => ⟨f i, g i⟩) = ⟨⟨a, f⟩, P.wPathCasesOn g' g⟩ := rfl
theorem w_map_wMk {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α)
(f : P.last.B a → P.W α) : g <$$> P.wMk a f' f = P.wMk a (g ⊚ f') fun i => g <$$> f i := by
show _ = P.wMk a (g ⊚ f') (MvFunctor.map g ∘ f)
have : MvFunctor.map g ∘ f = fun i => ⟨(f i).fst, g ⊚ (f i).snd⟩ := by
ext i : 1
dsimp [Function.comp_def]
cases f i
rfl
rw [this]
have : f = fun i => ⟨(f i).fst, (f i).snd⟩ := by
ext1 x
cases f x
rfl
rw [this]
dsimp
rw [wMk_eq, wMk_eq]
have h := MvPFunctor.map_eq P.wp g
rw [h, comp_wPathCasesOn]
-- TODO: this technical theorem is used in one place in constructing the initial algebra.
-- Can it be avoided?
/-- Constructor of a value of `P.obj (α ::: β)` from components.
Useful to avoid complicated type annotation -/
abbrev objAppend1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α)
(f : P.last.B a → β) : P (α ::: β) :=
⟨a, splitFun f' f⟩
theorem map_objAppend1 {α γ : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ γ) (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α)
(f : P.last.B a → P.W α) :
appendFun g (P.wMap g) <$$> P.objAppend1 a f' f =
P.objAppend1 a (g ⊚ f') fun x => P.wMap g (f x) := by
rw [objAppend1, objAppend1, map_eq, appendFun, ← splitFun_comp]; rfl
/-!
Yet another view of the W type: as a fixed point for a multivariate polynomial functor.
These are needed to use the W-construction to construct a fixed point of a qpf, since
the qpf axioms are expressed in terms of `map` on `P`.
-/
/-- Constructor for the W-type of `P` -/
def wMk' {α : TypeVec n} : P (α ::: P.W α) → P.W α
| ⟨a, f⟩ => P.wMk a (dropFun f) (lastFun f)
/-- Destructor for the W-type of `P` -/
def wDest' {α : TypeVec.{u} n} : P.W α → P (α.append1 (P.W α)) :=
P.wRec fun a f' f _ => ⟨a, splitFun f' f⟩
theorem wDest'_wMk {α : TypeVec n} (a : P.A) (f' : P.drop.B a ⟹ α) (f : P.last.B a → P.W α) :
| P.wDest' (P.wMk a f' f) = ⟨a, splitFun f' f⟩ := by rw [wDest', wRec_eq]
theorem wDest'_wMk' {α : TypeVec n} (x : P (α.append1 (P.W α))) : P.wDest' (P.wMk' x) = x := by
obtain ⟨a, f⟩ := x; rw [wMk', wDest'_wMk, split_dropFun_lastFun]
end MvPFunctor
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Multivariate/W.lean | 249 | 266 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Johan Commelin, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Hom.Monoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
/-!
# The basics of valuation theory.
The basic theory of valuations (non-archimedean norms) on a commutative ring,
following T. Wedhorn's unpublished notes “Adic Spaces” ([wedhorn_adic]).
The definition of a valuation we use here is Definition 1.22 of [wedhorn_adic].
A valuation on a ring `R` is a monoid homomorphism `v` to a linearly ordered
commutative monoid with zero, that in addition satisfies the following two axioms:
* `v 0 = 0`
* `∀ x y, v (x + y) ≤ max (v x) (v y)`
`Valuation R Γ₀` is the type of valuations `R → Γ₀`, with a coercion to the underlying
function. If `v` is a valuation from `R` to `Γ₀` then the induced group
homomorphism `Units(R) → Γ₀` is called `unit_map v`.
The equivalence "relation" `IsEquiv v₁ v₂ : Prop` defined in 1.27 of [wedhorn_adic] is not strictly
speaking a relation, because `v₁ : Valuation R Γ₁` and `v₂ : Valuation R Γ₂` might
not have the same type. This corresponds in ZFC to the set-theoretic difficulty
that the class of all valuations (as `Γ₀` varies) on a ring `R` is not a set.
The "relation" is however reflexive, symmetric and transitive in the obvious
sense. Note that we use 1.27(iii) of [wedhorn_adic] as the definition of equivalence.
## Main definitions
* `Valuation R Γ₀`, the type of valuations on `R` with values in `Γ₀`
* `Valuation.IsNontrivial` is the class of non-trivial valuations, namely those for which there
is an element in the ring whose valuation is `≠ 0` and `≠ 1`.
* `Valuation.IsEquiv`, the heterogeneous equivalence relation on valuations
* `Valuation.supp`, the support of a valuation
* `AddValuation R Γ₀`, the type of additive valuations on `R` with values in a
linearly ordered additive commutative group with a top element, `Γ₀`.
## Implementation Details
`AddValuation R Γ₀` is implemented as `Valuation R (Multiplicative Γ₀)ᵒᵈ`.
## Notation
In the `DiscreteValuation` locale:
* `ℕₘ₀` is a shorthand for `WithZero (Multiplicative ℕ)`
* `ℤₘ₀` is a shorthand for `WithZero (Multiplicative ℤ)`
## TODO
If ever someone extends `Valuation`, we should fully comply to the `DFunLike` by migrating the
boilerplate lemmas to `ValuationClass`.
-/
open Function Ideal
noncomputable section
variable {K F R : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
section
variable (F R) (Γ₀ : Type*) [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] [Ring R]
/-- The type of `Γ₀`-valued valuations on `R`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `ValuationClass`. -/
structure Valuation extends R →*₀ Γ₀ where
/-- The valuation of a sum is less than or equal to the maximum of the valuations. -/
map_add_le_max' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) ≤ max (toFun x) (toFun y)
/-- `ValuationClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of valuations.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `Valuation`. -/
class ValuationClass (F) (R Γ₀ : outParam Type*) [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] [Ring R]
[FunLike F R Γ₀] : Prop
extends MonoidWithZeroHomClass F R Γ₀ where
/-- The valuation of a sum is less than or equal to the maximum of the valuations. -/
map_add_le_max (f : F) (x y : R) : f (x + y) ≤ max (f x) (f y)
export ValuationClass (map_add_le_max)
instance [FunLike F R Γ₀] [ValuationClass F R Γ₀] : CoeTC F (Valuation R Γ₀) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_one' := map_one f
map_zero' := map_zero f
map_mul' := map_mul f
map_add_le_max' := map_add_le_max f }⟩
end
namespace Valuation
variable {Γ₀ : Type*}
variable {Γ'₀ : Type*}
variable {Γ''₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀]
section Basic
variable [Ring R]
section Monoid
variable [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ'₀]
instance : FunLike (Valuation R Γ₀) R Γ₀ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨_,_⟩, _⟩, _⟩ := f
congr
instance : ValuationClass (Valuation R Γ₀) R Γ₀ where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_max f := f.map_add_le_max'
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : R →*₀ Γ₀) (h) : ⇑(Valuation.mk f h) = f := rfl
theorem toFun_eq_coe (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : v.toFun = v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMonoidWithZeroHom_coe_eq_coe (v : Valuation R Γ₀) :
(v.toMonoidWithZeroHom : R → Γ₀) = v := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {v₁ v₂ : Valuation R Γ₀} (h : ∀ r, v₁ r = v₂ r) : v₁ = v₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
variable (v : Valuation R Γ₀)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_coe : ⇑(v : R →*₀ Γ₀) = v := rfl
protected theorem map_zero : v 0 = 0 :=
v.map_zero'
protected theorem map_one : v 1 = 1 :=
v.map_one'
protected theorem map_mul : ∀ x y, v (x * y) = v x * v y :=
v.map_mul'
-- Porting note: LHS side simplified so created map_add'
protected theorem map_add : ∀ x y, v (x + y) ≤ max (v x) (v y) :=
v.map_add_le_max'
@[simp]
theorem map_add' : ∀ x y, v (x + y) ≤ v x ∨ v (x + y) ≤ v y := by
intro x y
rw [← le_max_iff, ← ge_iff_le]
apply v.map_add
theorem map_add_le {x y g} (hx : v x ≤ g) (hy : v y ≤ g) : v (x + y) ≤ g :=
le_trans (v.map_add x y) <| max_le hx hy
theorem map_add_lt {x y g} (hx : v x < g) (hy : v y < g) : v (x + y) < g :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (v.map_add x y) <| max_lt hx hy
theorem map_sum_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {g : Γ₀} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, v (f i) ≤ g) :
v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ g := by
classical
refine
Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => v.map_zero ▸ zero_le')
(fun a s has ih hf => ?_) hf
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf; rw [Finset.sum_insert has]
exact v.map_add_le hf.1 (ih hf.2)
theorem map_sum_lt {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {g : Γ₀} (hg : g ≠ 0)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, v (f i) < g) : v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) < g := by
classical
refine
Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => v.map_zero ▸ (zero_lt_iff.2 hg))
(fun a s has ih hf => ?_) hf
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf; rw [Finset.sum_insert has]
exact v.map_add_lt hf.1 (ih hf.2)
theorem map_sum_lt' {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {g : Γ₀} (hg : 0 < g)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, v (f i) < g) : v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) < g :=
v.map_sum_lt (ne_of_gt hg) hf
protected theorem map_pow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), v (x ^ n) = v x ^ n :=
v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.map_pow
-- The following definition is not an instance, because we have more than one `v` on a given `R`.
-- In addition, type class inference would not be able to infer `v`.
/-- A valuation gives a preorder on the underlying ring. -/
def toPreorder : Preorder R :=
Preorder.lift v
/-- If `v` is a valuation on a division ring then `v(x) = 0` iff `x = 0`. -/
theorem zero_iff [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : v x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
map_eq_zero v
theorem ne_zero_iff [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : v x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero v
lemma pos_iff [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : 0 < v x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [zero_lt_iff, ne_zero_iff]
theorem unit_map_eq (u : Rˣ) : (Units.map (v : R →* Γ₀) u : Γ₀) = v u :=
rfl
theorem ne_zero_of_unit [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : Kˣ) : v x ≠ (0 : Γ₀) := by
simp only [ne_eq, Valuation.zero_iff, Units.ne_zero x, not_false_iff]
theorem ne_zero_of_isUnit [Nontrivial Γ₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : K) (hx : IsUnit x) :
v x ≠ (0 : Γ₀) := by
simpa [hx.choose_spec] using ne_zero_of_unit v hx.choose
/-- A ring homomorphism `S → R` induces a map `Valuation R Γ₀ → Valuation S Γ₀`. -/
def comap {S : Type*} [Ring S] (f : S →+* R) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : Valuation S Γ₀ :=
{ v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.comp f.toMonoidWithZeroHom with
toFun := v ∘ f
map_add_le_max' := fun x y => by simp only [comp_apply, v.map_add, map_add] }
@[simp]
theorem comap_apply {S : Type*} [Ring S] (f : S →+* R) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) (s : S) :
v.comap f s = v (f s) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : v.comap (RingHom.id R) = v :=
ext fun _r => rfl
theorem comap_comp {S₁ : Type*} {S₂ : Type*} [Ring S₁] [Ring S₂] (f : S₁ →+* S₂) (g : S₂ →+* R) :
v.comap (g.comp f) = (v.comap g).comap f :=
ext fun _r => rfl
/-- A `≤`-preserving group homomorphism `Γ₀ → Γ'₀` induces a map `Valuation R Γ₀ → Valuation R Γ'₀`.
-/
def map (f : Γ₀ →*₀ Γ'₀) (hf : Monotone f) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : Valuation R Γ'₀ :=
{ MonoidWithZeroHom.comp f v.toMonoidWithZeroHom with
toFun := f ∘ v
map_add_le_max' := fun r s =>
calc
f (v (r + s)) ≤ f (max (v r) (v s)) := hf (v.map_add r s)
_ = max (f (v r)) (f (v s)) := hf.map_max
}
@[simp]
lemma map_apply (f : Γ₀ →*₀ Γ'₀) (hf : Monotone f) (v : Valuation R Γ₀) (r : R) :
v.map f hf r = f (v r) := rfl
/-- Two valuations on `R` are defined to be equivalent if they induce the same preorder on `R`. -/
def IsEquiv (v₁ : Valuation R Γ₀) (v₂ : Valuation R Γ'₀) : Prop :=
∀ r s, v₁ r ≤ v₁ s ↔ v₂ r ≤ v₂ s
@[simp]
theorem map_neg (x : R) : v (-x) = v x :=
v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.map_neg x
theorem map_sub_swap (x y : R) : v (x - y) = v (y - x) :=
v.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.map_sub_swap x y
theorem map_sub (x y : R) : v (x - y) ≤ max (v x) (v y) :=
calc
v (x - y) = v (x + -y) := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (v x) (v <| -y) := v.map_add _ _
_ = max (v x) (v y) := by rw [map_neg]
theorem map_sub_le {x y g} (hx : v x ≤ g) (hy : v y ≤ g) : v (x - y) ≤ g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact v.map_add_le hx <| (v.map_neg y).trans_le hy
theorem map_sub_lt {x y : R} {g : Γ₀} (hx : v x < g) (hy : v y < g) : v (x - y) < g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact v.map_add_lt hx <| (v.map_neg y).trans_lt hy
variable {x y : R}
theorem map_add_of_distinct_val (h : v x ≠ v y) : v (x + y) = max (v x) (v y) := by
suffices ¬v (x + y) < max (v x) (v y) from
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 (v.map_add x y)) this
intro h'
wlog vyx : v y < v x generalizing x y
· refine this h.symm ?_ (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_right vyx)
rwa [add_comm, max_comm]
rw [max_eq_left_of_lt vyx] at h'
apply lt_irrefl (v x)
calc
v x = v (x + y - y) := by simp
_ ≤ max (v <| x + y) (v y) := map_sub _ _ _
_ < v x := max_lt h' vyx
theorem map_add_eq_of_lt_right (h : v x < v y) : v (x + y) = v y :=
(v.map_add_of_distinct_val h.ne).trans (max_eq_right_iff.mpr h.le)
theorem map_add_eq_of_lt_left (h : v y < v x) : v (x + y) = v x := by
rw [add_comm]; exact map_add_eq_of_lt_right _ h
theorem map_sub_eq_of_lt_right (h : v x < v y) : v (x - y) = v y := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, map_add_eq_of_lt_right, map_neg]
rwa [map_neg]
open scoped Classical in
theorem map_sum_eq_of_lt {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R} {j : ι}
(hj : j ∈ s) (h0 : v (f j) ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s \ {j}, v (f i) < v (f j)) :
v (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = v (f j) := by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton hj]
exact map_add_eq_of_lt_left _ (map_sum_lt _ h0 hf)
theorem map_sub_eq_of_lt_left (h : v y < v x) : v (x - y) = v x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, map_add_eq_of_lt_left]
rwa [map_neg]
theorem map_eq_of_sub_lt (h : v (y - x) < v x) : v y = v x := by
have := Valuation.map_add_of_distinct_val v (ne_of_gt h).symm
rw [max_eq_right (le_of_lt h)] at this
simpa using this
theorem map_one_add_of_lt (h : v x < 1) : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
rw [← v.map_one] at h
simpa only [v.map_one] using v.map_add_eq_of_lt_left h
theorem map_one_sub_of_lt (h : v x < 1) : v (1 - x) = 1 := by
rw [← v.map_one, ← v.map_neg] at h
rw [sub_eq_add_neg 1 x]
simpa only [v.map_one, v.map_neg] using v.map_add_eq_of_lt_left h
/-- An ordered monoid isomorphism `Γ₀ ≃ Γ'₀` induces an equivalence
`Valuation R Γ₀ ≃ Valuation R Γ'₀`. -/
def congr (f : Γ₀ ≃*o Γ'₀) : Valuation R Γ₀ ≃ Valuation R Γ'₀ where
toFun := map f f.toOrderIso.monotone
invFun := map f.symm f.toOrderIso.symm.monotone
left_inv ν := by ext; simp
right_inv ν := by ext; simp
end Monoid
section Group
variable [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀] (v : Valuation R Γ₀) {x y : R}
theorem map_inv {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : ∀ x, v x⁻¹ = (v x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _
theorem map_div {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] (v : Valuation R Γ₀) : ∀ x y, v (x / y) = v x / v y :=
map_div₀ _
theorem one_lt_val_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : 1 < v x ↔ v x⁻¹ < 1 := by
simp [inv_lt_one₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem one_le_val_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ v x ↔ v x⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by
simp [inv_le_one₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem val_lt_one_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : v x < 1 ↔ 1 < v x⁻¹ := by
simp [one_lt_inv₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem val_le_one_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} (h : x ≠ 0) : v x ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ v x⁻¹ := by
simp [one_le_inv₀ (v.pos_iff.2 h)]
theorem val_eq_one_iff (v : Valuation K Γ₀) {x : K} : v x = 1 ↔ v x⁻¹ = 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [map_inv₀, inv_eq_one]
· simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, And.comm] using and_congr (one_le_val_iff v h) (val_le_one_iff v h)
theorem val_le_one_or_val_inv_lt_one (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : K) : v x ≤ 1 ∨ v x⁻¹ < 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, zero_le', inv_zero, zero_lt_one, or_self]
· simp only [← one_lt_val_iff v h, le_or_lt]
/--
This theorem is a weaker version of `Valuation.val_le_one_or_val_inv_lt_one`, but more symmetric
in `x` and `x⁻¹`.
-/
theorem val_le_one_or_val_inv_le_one (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (x : K) : v x ≤ 1 ∨ v x⁻¹ ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, zero_le', inv_zero, or_self]
· simp only [← one_le_val_iff v h, le_total]
/-- The subgroup of elements whose valuation is less than a certain unit. -/
def ltAddSubgroup (v : Valuation R Γ₀) (γ : Γ₀ˣ) : AddSubgroup R where
carrier := { x | v x < γ }
zero_mem' := by simp
add_mem' {x y} x_in y_in := lt_of_le_of_lt (v.map_add x y) (max_lt x_in y_in)
neg_mem' x_in := by rwa [Set.mem_setOf, map_neg]
end Group
end Basic
section IsNontrivial
variable [Ring R] [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀] (v : Valuation R Γ₀)
/-- A valuation on a ring is nontrivial if there exists an element with valuation
not equal to `0` or `1`. -/
class IsNontrivial : Prop where
exists_val_nontrivial : ∃ x : R, v x ≠ 0 ∧ v x ≠ 1
| /-- For fields, being nontrivial is equivalent to the existence of a unit with valuation
not equal to `1`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/Basic.lean | 401 | 402 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.IdealOperations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
/-!
# The normalizer of Lie submodules and subalgebras.
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie subalgebra `L`, the normalizer of a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` is
the Lie submodule with underlying set `{ m | ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N }`.
The lattice of Lie submodules thus has two natural operations, the normalizer: `N ↦ N.normalizer`
and the ideal operation: `N ↦ ⁅⊤, N⁆`; these are adjoint, i.e., they form a Galois connection. This
adjointness is the reason that we may define nilpotency in terms of either the upper or lower
central series.
Given a Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, we may regard `H` as a Lie submodule of `L` over `H`, and thus
consider the normalizer. This turns out to be a Lie subalgebra.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.normalizer`
* `LieSubalgebra.normalizer`
* `LieSubmodule.gc_top_lie_normalizer`
## Tags
lie algebra, normalizer
-/
variable {R L M M' : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] [LieModule R L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M) {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
/-- The normalizer of a Lie submodule.
See also `LieSubmodule.idealizer`. -/
def normalizer : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := {m | ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N}
add_mem' hm₁ hm₂ x := by rw [lie_add]; exact N.add_mem' (hm₁ x) (hm₂ x)
zero_mem' x := by simp
smul_mem' t m hm x := by rw [lie_smul]; exact N.smul_mem' t (hm x)
lie_mem {x m} hm y := by rw [leibniz_lie]; exact N.add_mem' (hm ⁅y, x⁆) (N.lie_mem (hm y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_normalizer (m : M) : m ∈ N.normalizer ↔ ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_normalizer : N ≤ N.normalizer := by
intro m hm
rw [mem_normalizer]
exact fun x => N.lie_mem hm
theorem normalizer_inf : (N₁ ⊓ N₂).normalizer = N₁.normalizer ⊓ N₂.normalizer := by
ext; simp [← forall_and]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem normalizer_mono (h : N₁ ≤ N₂) : normalizer N₁ ≤ normalizer N₂ := by
| intro m hm
rw [mem_normalizer] at hm ⊢
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Normalizer.lean | 70 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
| end Preimage
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 180 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal.Lemmas
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file, by design, is independent of `NormedSpace` in the import hierarchy. It contains
important specific limit computations in metric spaces, in ordered rings/fields, and in specific
instances of these such as `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis NormedSpace
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Topology Nat uniformity NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
theorem tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem tendsto_one_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1/(n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1
theorem NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← NNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem NNReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ≥0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem EReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {C : EReal} (h : C ≠ ⊥) (h' : C ≠ ⊤) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) = fun n : ℕ ↦ ((C.toReal / n : ℝ) : EReal) := by
ext n
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal h' h, ← coe_coe_eq_natCast n, ← coe_div C.toReal n]
rw [this, ← coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat C.toReal
theorem tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) by simpa
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (_root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1)
theorem NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜]
[Algebra ℝ≥0 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ≥0 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert (continuous_algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜).continuousAt.tendsto.comp
tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero]
theorem tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 𝕜
/-- The limit of `n / (n + x)` is 1, for any constant `x` (valid in `ℝ` or any topological division
algebra over `ℝ`, e.g., `ℂ`).
TODO: introduce a typeclass saying that `1 / n` tends to 0 at top, making it possible to get this
statement simultaneously on `ℚ`, `ℝ` and `ℂ`. -/
theorem tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [DivisionRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜]
[CharZero 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] [IsTopologicalDivisionRing 𝕜] (x : 𝕜) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : 𝕜) / (n + x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert Tendsto.congr' ((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn ↦ _)) _
· exact fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (1 + x / n)
· field_simp [Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn]
· have : 𝓝 (1 : 𝕜) = 𝓝 (1 / (1 + x * (0 : 𝕜))) := by
rw [mul_zero, add_zero, div_one]
rw [this]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.div (tendsto_const_nhds.add ?_) (by simp)
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_
have := ((continuous_algebraMap ℝ 𝕜).tendsto _).comp tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero, Filter.tendsto_atTop'] at this
refine Iff.mpr tendsto_atTop' ?_
intros
simp_all only [comp_apply, map_inv₀, map_natCast]
/-- For any positive `m : ℕ`, `((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)` tends to `0` as `n` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_mod_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have h0 : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, 0 ≤ (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ)) n := by aesop
exact tendsto_bdd_div_atTop_nhds_zero h0
(.of_forall (fun n ↦ cast_le.mpr (mod_lt n hm).le)) tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel {α G : Type*} [GroupWithZero G] {f g : α → G}
{l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓟 {0}ᶜ)) : (fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x := by
filter_upwards [hg.le_comap <| preimage_mem_comap (m := g) (mem_principal_self {0}ᶜ)] with x hx
aesop
/-- If `g` tends to `∞`, then eventually for all `x` we have `(f x / g x) * g x = f x`. -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
(fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x :=
div_mul_cancel <| hg.mono_right <| le_principal_iff.mpr <|
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) <| by simp
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
(hlim.pos_mul_atTop ha hg).congr' (EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop hg)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.den {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
[ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto g l atTop :=
have hlim' : Tendsto (fun x => g x / f x) l (𝓝 a⁻¹) := by
simp_rw [← inv_div (f _)]
exact Filter.Tendsto.inv (f := fun x => f x / g x) hlim
(hlim'.pos_mul_atTop (inv_pos_of_pos ha) hf).congr' (.div_mul_cancel_atTop hf)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `f x / g x` tends to a positive constant, then `f` tends to `∞` if
and only if `g` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num_atTop_iff_den_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [TopologicalSpace K]
[OrderTopology K] [ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto g l atTop :=
⟨fun hf ↦ Tendsto.den hf ha hlim, fun hg ↦ Tendsto.num hg ha hlim⟩
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos
[Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (r + 1) ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone' (pow_right_mono₀ <| le_add_of_nonneg_left h.le) <|
not_bddAbove_iff.2 fun _ ↦ Set.exists_range_iff.2 <| add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
[Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 1 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop atTop :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
theorem Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ m ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt h) ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt h)
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
h₁.eq_or_lt.elim
(fun hr ↦ (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).mp <| by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, ← hr, tendsto_const_nhds])
(fun hr ↦
have := (one_lt_inv₀ hr).2 h₂ |> tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp this).congr fun n ↦ by simp)
@[simp] theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ |r| < 1 := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by_contra (fun hr_le ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· by_cases hr : 1 = |r|
· replace h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ |r|^n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by simpa only [← abs_pow, h]
simp only [hr.symm, one_pow] at h
exact zero_ne_one <| tendsto_nhds_unique h tendsto_const_nhds
· apply @not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop 𝕜 ℕ _ _ _ _ atTop _ (fun n ↦ |r| ^ n) _ 0 _
· refine (pow_right_strictMono₀ <| lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le)
hr).monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop (fun b ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (pow_unbounded_of_one_lt b (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le) hr))
exact ⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩
· simpa only [← abs_pow]
· simpa only [← abs_pow] using (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg r)) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhdsWithin_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[Archimedean 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 < r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2
⟨tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁.le h₂,
tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ pow_pos h₁ _⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow_of_lt_one {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < r)
(h₁ : r < 1) :
(uniformity α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ ↦ True) fun k ↦ { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ k } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ ↦ pow_pos h₀ _) fun _ ε0 ↦
(exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h₁).imp fun _ hk ↦ ⟨trivial, hk.le⟩
theorem geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, c * u k < u (k + 1)) : c ^ n * u 0 < u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn _ _ h
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem geom_le {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, c * u k ≤ u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 ≤ u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ _ h <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem lt_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) < c * u k) : u n < c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn _ h _
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem le_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) ≤ c * u k) :
u n ≤ c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ h _ <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k * v n ≤ v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_geom_le {v : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hc : 1 < c)
(hu : ∀ n, c * v n ≤ v (n + 1)) : Tendsto v atTop atTop :=
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun n ↦ geom_le (zero_le_one.trans hc.le) n fun k _ ↦ hu k) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt hc).atTop_mul_const h₀
theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.1 <| by
simp only [NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_zero,
_root_.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr]
@[simp]
protected theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [coe_pow, coe_zero, abs_eq, coe_lt_one, val_eq_coe] using
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp <| tendsto_coe.mpr h, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero]
norm_cast at *
apply NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
lift r to NNReal
· refine fun hr ↦ top_ne_zero (tendsto_nhds_unique (EventuallyEq.tendsto ?_) (hr ▸ h))
exact eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨1, fun _ hn ↦ pow_eq_top_iff.mpr ⟨rfl, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mp hn⟩⟩
rw [← coe_zero] at h
norm_cast at h ⊢
exact NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp h
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_top_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ r^n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) ↔ 1 < r := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· contrapose!
intro r_le_one h_tends
specialize h_tends (Ioi_mem_nhds one_lt_top)
simp only [Filter.mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, ge_iff_le, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Ioi] at h_tends
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h_tends
exact lt_irrefl _ <| lt_of_lt_of_le (hn n le_rfl) <| pow_le_one₀ (zero_le _) r_le_one
· intro r_gt_one
have obs := @Tendsto.inv ℝ≥0∞ ℕ _ _ _ (fun n ↦ (r⁻¹)^n) atTop 0
simp only [ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff, inv_zero] at obs
simpa [← ENNReal.inv_pow] using obs <| ENNReal.inv_lt_one.mpr r_gt_one
lemma ENNReal.eq_zero_of_le_mul_pow {x r : ℝ≥0∞} {ε : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≤ ε * r ^ n) : x = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine ge_of_tendsto' (f := fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ε * r ^ n) (x := atTop) ?_ h
rw [← mul_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞) (a := ε)]
exact Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr) (Or.inr coe_ne_top)
/-! ### Geometric series -/
section Geometric
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have : r ≠ 1 := ne_of_lt h₂
have : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
(hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr <| by
simp_all [neg_inv, geom_sum_eq, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem summable_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
theorem hasSum_geometric_two : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) 2 := by
convert hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one _ _ <;> norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_two⟩
theorem summable_geometric_two_encode {ι : Type*} [Encodable ι] :
Summable fun i : ι ↦ (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ Encodable.encode i :=
summable_geometric_two.comp_injective Encodable.encode_injective
theorem tsum_geometric_two : (∑' n : ℕ, ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) = 2 :=
hasSum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
theorem sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i) ≤ 2 := by
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i := by
intro i
apply pow_nonneg
norm_num
convert summable_geometric_two.sum_le_tsum (range n) (fun i _ ↦ this i)
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two : (∑' n : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ n) = 2 :=
(inv_eq_one_div (2 : ℝ)).symm ▸ tsum_geometric_two
/-- The sum of `2⁻¹ ^ i` for `n ≤ i` equals `2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n`. -/
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two_ge (n : ℕ) :
(∑' i, ite (n ≤ i) ((2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ i) 0) = 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n := by
have A : Summable fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0 := by
simpa only [← piecewise_eq_indicator, one_div]
using summable_geometric_two.indicator {i | n ≤ i}
have B : ((Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0) = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi ↦
ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h ↦ (lt_irrefl _ ((Finset.mem_range.1 hi).trans_le h)).elim
simp only [← Summable.sum_add_tsum_nat_add n A, B, if_true, zero_add, zero_le',
le_add_iff_nonneg_left, pow_add, _root_.tsum_mul_right, tsum_geometric_inv_two]
theorem hasSum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n) a := by
convert HasSum.mul_left (a / 2)
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one) using 1
· funext n
simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
rfl
· norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n :=
⟨a, hasSum_geometric_two' a⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : ∑' n : ℕ, a / 2 / 2 ^ n = a :=
(hasSum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
/-- **Sum of a Geometric Series** -/
theorem NNReal.hasSum_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
apply NNReal.hasSum_coe.1
push_cast
rw [NNReal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)]
exact hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr
theorem NNReal.summable_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
@[simp]
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
rcases lt_or_le r 1 with hr | hr
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
norm_cast at *
convert ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq (NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr)
rw [ENNReal.coe_inv <| ne_of_gt <| tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr, coe_sub, coe_one]
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hr, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_eq_top]
refine fun a ha ↦
(ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp fun n hn ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hn ?_
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ range n, 1 := by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range n, r ^ i := by gcongr; apply one_le_pow₀ hr
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric_add_one (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ (n + 1) = r * (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ', ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
end Geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section EdistLeGeometric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (r C : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C * r ^ n)
include hr hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric : CauchySeq f := by
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu ?_
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top hC (ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 ?_)
exact (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne'
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ C * r ^ n / (1 - r) := by
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _
simp only [pow_add, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) := by
simpa only [_root_.pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end EdistLeGeometric
section EdistLeGeometricTwo
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C / 2 ^ n) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a))
include hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : CauchySeq f := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at hu
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C ?_ hC hu
simp [ENNReal.one_lt_two]
include hu ha in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C * 2^-n`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto (n : ℕ) : edist (f n) a ≤ 2 * C / 2 ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at *
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm]
convert edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto 2⁻¹ C hu ha n using 1
rw [ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
include hu ha in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ : edist (f 0) a ≤ 2 * C := by
simpa only [_root_.pow_zero, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_one, mul_one] using
edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto C hu ha 0
|
end EdistLeGeometricTwo
section LeGeometric
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Basic.lean | 460 | 464 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Basic
/-!
# Pointwise convergence of indicator functions
In this file, we prove the equivalence of three different ways to phrase that the indicator
functions of sets converge pointwise.
## Main results
For `A` a set, `(Asᵢ)` an indexed collection of sets, under mild conditions, the following are
equivalent:
(a) the indicator functions of `Asᵢ` tend to the indicator function of `A` pointwise;
(b) for every `x`, we eventually have that `x ∈ Asᵢ` holds iff `x ∈ A` holds;
(c) `Tendsto As _ <| Filter.pi (pure <| · ∈ A)`.
The results stating these in the case when the indicators take values in a Fréchet space are:
* `tendsto_indicator_const_iff_forall_eventually` is the equivalence (a) ↔ (b);
* `tendsto_indicator_const_iff_tendsto_pi_pure` is the equivalence (a) ↔ (c).
-/
open Filter Topology
variable {α : Type*} {A : Set α}
variable {β : Type*} [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β]
variable {ι : Type*} (L : Filter ι) {As : ι → Set α}
lemma tendsto_ite {β : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {q : Prop} [Decidable q]
{a b : β} {F G : Filter β}
(haG : {a}ᶜ ∈ G) (hbF : {b}ᶜ ∈ F) (haF : principal {a} ≤ F) (hbG : principal {b} ≤ G) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ if p i then a else b) L (if q then F else G) ↔ ∀ᶠ i in L, p i ↔ q := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases hq : q
· simp only [hq, ite_true] at h
filter_upwards [mem_map.mp (h hbF)] with i hi
simp only [Set.preimage_compl, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
ite_eq_right_iff, not_forall, exists_prop] at hi
tauto
· simp only [hq, ite_false] at h
filter_upwards [mem_map.mp (h haG)] with i hi
simp only [Set.preimage_compl, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
ite_eq_left_iff, not_forall, exists_prop] at hi
tauto
· have obs : (fun _ ↦ if q then a else b) =ᶠ[L] (fun i ↦ if p i then a else b) := by
filter_upwards [h] with i hi
simp only [hi]
apply Tendsto.congr' obs
by_cases hq : q
· simp only [hq, iff_true, ite_true]
apply le_trans _ haF
simp only [principal_singleton, le_pure_iff, mem_map, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
Set.preimage_const_of_mem, univ_mem]
· simp only [hq, ite_false]
apply le_trans _ hbG
simp only [principal_singleton, le_pure_iff, mem_map, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
Set.preimage_const_of_mem, univ_mem]
lemma tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually' (b : β)
(nhd_b : {0}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 b) (nhd_o : {b}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 0) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x))
↔ ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
classical
have heart := @tendsto_ite ι L β (fun i ↦ x ∈ As i) _ (x ∈ A) _ b 0 (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (0 : β))
nhd_o nhd_b ?_ ?_
· convert heart
by_cases hxA : x ∈ A <;> simp [hxA]
· simp only [principal_singleton, le_def, mem_pure]
exact fun s s_nhd ↦ mem_of_mem_nhds s_nhd
· simp only [principal_singleton, le_def, mem_pure]
exact fun s s_nhd ↦ mem_of_mem_nhds s_nhd
lemma tendsto_indicator_const_iff_forall_eventually'
(b : β) (nhd_b : {0}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 b) (nhd_o : {b}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)))
↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
simp_rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]
apply forall_congr'
exact tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually' L b nhd_b nhd_o
/-- The indicator functions of `Asᵢ` evaluated at `x` tend to the indicator function of `A`
evaluated at `x` if and only if we eventually have the equivalence `x ∈ Asᵢ ↔ x ∈ A`. -/
@[simp] lemma tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually [T1Space β] (b : β) [NeZero b]
(x : α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b) x))
↔ ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
apply tendsto_indicator_const_apply_iff_eventually' _ b
· simp only [compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff, ne_eq, NeZero.ne, not_false_eq_true]
· simp only [compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff, ne_eq, (NeZero.ne b).symm, not_false_eq_true]
|
/-- The indicator functions of `Asᵢ` tend to the indicator function of `A` pointwise if and only if
for every `x`, we eventually have the equivalence `x ∈ Asᵢ ↔ x ∈ A`. -/
@[simp] lemma tendsto_indicator_const_iff_forall_eventually [T1Space β] (b : β) [NeZero b] :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (As i).indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) L (𝓝 (A.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)))
↔ ∀ x, ∀ᶠ i in L, (x ∈ As i ↔ x ∈ A) := by
apply tendsto_indicator_const_iff_forall_eventually' _ b
· simp only [compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff, ne_eq, NeZero.ne, not_false_eq_true]
| Mathlib/Topology/IndicatorConstPointwise.lean | 100 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Commute
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Even and odd elements in rings
This file defines odd elements and proves some general facts about even and odd elements of rings.
As opposed to `Even`, `Odd` does not have a multiplicative counterpart.
## TODO
Try to generalize `Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas whose `Semiring`
assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary. If that turns out to be true, they could be moved
to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even`.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even` for the definition of even elements.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered OrderedRing
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma Even.neg_pow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a
simp_rw [← two_mul, pow_mul, neg_sq]
lemma Even.neg_one_pow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a : α} {n : ℤ}
lemma Even.neg_zpow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [← Int.two_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_two, neg_mul_neg]
lemma Even.neg_one_zpow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_zpow, one_zpow]
end DivisionMonoid
@[simp] lemma IsSquare.zero [MulZeroClass α] : IsSquare (0 : α) := ⟨0, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [Semiring β] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma even_iff_exists_two_mul : Even a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b := by simp [even_iff_exists_two_nsmul]
lemma even_iff_two_dvd : Even a ↔ 2 ∣ a := by simp [Even, Dvd.dvd, two_mul]
alias ⟨Even.two_dvd, _⟩ := even_iff_two_dvd
lemma Even.trans_dvd (ha : Even a) (hab : a ∣ b) : Even b :=
even_iff_two_dvd.2 <| ha.two_dvd.trans hab
lemma Dvd.dvd.even (hab : a ∣ b) (ha : Even a) : Even b := ha.trans_dvd hab
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul (α) [NonAssocSemiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x) = {a | Even a} := by
ext x
simp [eq_comm, two_mul, Even]
@[simp] lemma even_two : Even (2 : α) := ⟨1, by rw [one_add_one_eq_two]⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_left (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (b * a) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft _)
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_right (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (a * b) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight _)
lemma even_two_mul (a : α) : Even (2 * a) := ⟨a, two_mul _⟩
lemma Even.pow_of_ne_zero (ha : Even a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → Even (a ^ n)
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.mul_left _
/-- An element `a` of a semiring is odd if there exists `k` such `a = 2*k + 1`. -/
def Odd (a : α) : Prop := ∃ k, a = 2 * k + 1
lemma odd_iff_exists_bit1 : Odd a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b + 1 := exists_congr fun b ↦ by rw [two_mul]
alias ⟨Odd.exists_bit1, _⟩ := odd_iff_exists_bit1
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul_add_one (α : Type*) [Semiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x + 1) = {a | Odd a} := by ext x; simp [Odd, eq_comm]
lemma Even.add_odd : Even a → Odd b → Odd (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨a + b, by rw [mul_add, ← two_mul, add_assoc]⟩
lemma Even.odd_add (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (b + a) := add_comm a b ▸ ha.add_odd hb
lemma Odd.add_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a + b) := add_comm a b ▸ hb.add_odd ha
lemma Odd.add_odd : Odd a → Odd b → Even (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a + b + 1, ?_⟩
rw [two_mul, two_mul]
ac_rfl
@[simp] lemma odd_one : Odd (1 : α) :=
⟨0, (zero_add _).symm.trans (congr_arg (· + (1 : α)) (mul_zero _).symm)⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.add_one (h : Even a) : Odd (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Even.one_add (h : Even a) : Odd (1 + a) := h.odd_add odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.add_one (h : Odd a) : Even (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.one_add (h : Odd a) : Even (1 + a) := odd_one.add_odd h
lemma odd_two_mul_add_one (a : α) : Odd (2 * a + 1) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma odd_add_self_one' : Odd (a + (a + 1)) := by simp [← add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self : Odd (a + 1 + a) := by simp [add_comm _ a]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self' : Odd (a + (1 + a)) := by simp [add_comm 1 a]
lemma Odd.map [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] (f : F) : Odd a → Odd (f a) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨f a, by simp [two_mul]⟩
lemma Odd.natCast {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Odd (n : R) :=
hn.map <| Nat.castRingHom R
@[simp] lemma Odd.mul : Odd a → Odd b → Odd (a * b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨2 * a * b + b + a, ?_⟩
rw [mul_add, add_mul, mul_one, ← add_assoc, one_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc,
← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_comm]
lemma Odd.pow (ha : Odd a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Odd (a ^ n)
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact odd_one
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.pow.mul ha
lemma Odd.pow_add_pow_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd α] (hn : Odd n) (hab : a + b = 0) :
a ^ n + b ^ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
induction k with | zero => simpa | succ k ih => ?_
have : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := add_right_cancel <|
calc
a ^ 2 + a * b = 0 := by rw [sq, ← mul_add, hab, mul_zero]
_ = b ^ 2 + a * b := by rw [sq, ← add_mul, add_comm, hab, zero_mul]
refine add_right_cancel (b := b ^ (2 * k + 1) * a ^ 2) ?_
calc
_ = (a ^ (2 * k + 1) + b ^ (2 * k + 1)) * a ^ 2 + b ^ (2 * k + 3) := by
rw [add_mul, ← pow_add, add_right_comm]; rfl
_ = _ := by rw [ih, zero_mul, zero_add, zero_add, this, ← pow_add]
end Semiring
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ}
lemma Odd.neg_pow : Odd n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = -a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [pow_add, pow_mul, neg_sq, pow_one, mul_neg]
@[simp] lemma Odd.neg_one_pow (h : Odd n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = -1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section Ring
variable [Ring α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ}
lemma even_neg_two : Even (-2 : α) := by simp only [even_neg, even_two]
lemma Odd.neg (hp : Odd a) : Odd (-a) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hp
use -(k + 1)
rw [mul_neg, mul_add, neg_add, add_assoc, two_mul (1 : α), neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right,
← neg_add, hk]
@[simp] lemma odd_neg : Odd (-a) ↔ Odd a := ⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg a ▸ h.neg, Odd.neg⟩
lemma odd_neg_one : Odd (-1 : α) := by simp
lemma Odd.sub_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_even hb.neg
lemma Even.sub_odd (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
lemma Odd.sub_odd (ha : Odd a) (hb : Odd b) : Even (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
end Ring
namespace Nat
variable {m n : ℕ}
lemma odd_iff : Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ↦ by omega, fun h ↦ ⟨n / 2, (mod_add_div n 2).symm.trans (by rw [h, add_comm])⟩⟩
instance : DecidablePred (Odd : ℕ → Prop) := fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ odd_iff.symm
lemma not_odd_iff : ¬Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 0 := by rw [odd_iff, mod_two_not_eq_one]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_iff_even : ¬Odd n ↔ Even n := by rw [not_odd_iff, even_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_even_iff_odd : ¬Even n ↔ Odd n := by rw [not_even_iff, odd_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_zero : ¬Odd 0 := not_odd_iff.mpr rfl
lemma _root_.Odd.not_two_dvd_nat (h : Odd n) : ¬(2 ∣ n) := by
rwa [← even_iff_two_dvd, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma even_xor_odd (n : ℕ) : Xor' (Even n) (Odd n) := by
simp [Xor', ← not_even_iff_odd, Decidable.em (Even n)]
lemma even_or_odd (n : ℕ) : Even n ∨ Odd n := (even_xor_odd n).or
lemma even_or_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, n = 2 * k ∨ n = 2 * k + 1 := by
simpa only [← two_mul, exists_or, Odd, Even] using even_or_odd n
lemma even_xor_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, Xor' (n = 2 * k) (n = 2 * k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ | ⟨k, rfl⟩ := even_or_odd n <;> use k
· simpa only [← two_mul, eq_self_iff_true, xor_true] using (succ_ne_self (2 * k)).symm
· simpa only [xor_true, xor_comm] using (succ_ne_self _)
lemma odd_add_one {n : ℕ} : Odd (n + 1) ↔ ¬ Odd n := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, Nat.even_add_one, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : m % 2 + (m + n) % 2 = 1 :=
((even_or_odd m).elim fun hm ↦ by rw [even_iff.1 hm, odd_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]) fun hm ↦ by
rw [odd_iff.1 hm, even_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]
@[simp] lemma mod_two_add_succ_mod_two (m : ℕ) : m % 2 + (m + 1) % 2 = 1 :=
mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two m odd_one
@[simp] lemma succ_mod_two_add_mod_two (m : ℕ) : (m + 1) % 2 + m % 2 = 1 := by
rw [add_comm, mod_two_add_succ_mod_two]
lemma even_add' : Even (m + n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Odd n) := by
rw [even_add, ← not_odd_iff_even, ← not_odd_iff_even, not_iff_not]
@[simp] lemma not_even_bit1 (n : ℕ) : ¬Even (2 * n + 1) := by simp [parity_simps]
|
lemma not_even_two_mul_add_one (n : ℕ) : ¬ Even (2 * n + 1) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Parity.lean | 243 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Properties
/-!
# Function field of integral schemes
We define the function field of an irreducible scheme as the stalk of the generic point.
This is a field when the scheme is integral.
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.functionField`: The function field of an integral scheme.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.germToFunctionField`: The canonical map from a component into the
function field. This map is injective.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
universe u v
open TopologicalSpace Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits TopCat
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable (X : Scheme)
/-- The function field of an irreducible scheme is the local ring at its generic point.
Despite the name, this is a field only when the scheme is integral. -/
noncomputable abbrev Scheme.functionField [IrreducibleSpace X] : CommRingCat :=
X.presheaf.stalk (genericPoint X)
/-- The restriction map from a component to the function field. -/
noncomputable abbrev Scheme.germToFunctionField [IrreducibleSpace X] (U : X.Opens)
[h : Nonempty U] : Γ(X, U) ⟶ X.functionField :=
X.presheaf.germ U
(genericPoint X)
(((genericPoint_spec X).mem_open_set_iff U.isOpen).mpr (by simpa using h))
noncomputable instance [IrreducibleSpace X] (U : X.Opens) [Nonempty U] :
Algebra Γ(X, U) X.functionField :=
(X.germToFunctionField U).hom.toAlgebra
noncomputable instance [IsIntegral X] : Field X.functionField := by
refine .ofIsUnitOrEqZero fun a ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨U, m, s, rfl⟩ := TopCat.Presheaf.germ_exist _ _ a
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right, ← (X.presheaf.germ _ _ m).hom.map_zero]
intro ha
replace ha := ne_of_apply_ne _ ha
have hs : genericPoint X ∈ RingedSpace.basicOpen _ s := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, (genericPoint_spec X).mem_open_set_iff,
Set.univ_inter, Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← Opens.coe_bot, ← SetLike.ext'_iff]
· erw [basicOpen_eq_bot_iff]
exact ha
· exact (RingedSpace.basicOpen _ _).isOpen
have := (X.presheaf.germ _ _ hs).hom.isUnit_map (RingedSpace.isUnit_res_basicOpen _ s)
rwa [Presheaf.germ_res_apply] at this
theorem germ_injective_of_isIntegral [IsIntegral X] {U : X.Opens} (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
Function.Injective (X.presheaf.germ U x hx) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro y hy
rw [← (X.presheaf.germ U x hx).hom.map_zero] at hy
obtain ⟨W, hW, iU, iV, e⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_eq _ hx hx _ _ hy
cases Subsingleton.elim iU iV
haveI : Nonempty W := ⟨⟨_, hW⟩⟩
exact map_injective_of_isIntegral X iU e
theorem Scheme.germToFunctionField_injective [IsIntegral X] (U : X.Opens) [Nonempty U] :
Function.Injective (X.germToFunctionField U) :=
germ_injective_of_isIntegral _ _ _
theorem genericPoint_eq_of_isOpenImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
[hX : IrreducibleSpace X] [IrreducibleSpace Y] :
f.base (genericPoint X) = genericPoint Y := by
apply ((genericPoint_spec Y).eq _).symm
convert (genericPoint_spec X).image (show Continuous f.base by fun_prop)
symm
rw [← Set.univ_subset_iff]
convert subset_closure_inter_of_isPreirreducible_of_isOpen _ H.base_open.isOpen_range _
· rw [Set.univ_inter, Set.image_univ]
· apply PreirreducibleSpace.isPreirreducible_univ (X := Y)
· exact ⟨_, trivial, Set.mem_range_self hX.2.some⟩
noncomputable instance stalkFunctionFieldAlgebra [IrreducibleSpace X] (x : X) :
Algebra (X.presheaf.stalk x) X.functionField := by
-- TODO: can we write this normally after the refactor finishes?
apply RingHom.toAlgebra
exact (X.presheaf.stalkSpecializes ((genericPoint_spec X).specializes trivial)).hom
instance functionField_isScalarTower [IrreducibleSpace X] (U : X.Opens) (x : U)
[Nonempty U] : IsScalarTower Γ(X, U) (X.presheaf.stalk x) X.functionField := by
apply IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq'
simp_rw [RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra]
change _ = (X.presheaf.germ U x x.2 ≫ _).hom
rw [X.presheaf.germ_stalkSpecializes]
noncomputable instance (R : CommRingCat.{u}) [IsDomain R] :
Algebra R (Spec R).functionField :=
-- TODO: can we write this normally after the refactor finishes?
RingHom.toAlgebra <| by apply CommRingCat.Hom.hom; apply StructureSheaf.toStalk
@[simp]
theorem genericPoint_eq_bot_of_affine (R : CommRingCat) [IsDomain R] :
genericPoint (Spec R) = (⊥ : PrimeSpectrum R) := by
apply (genericPoint_spec (Spec R)).eq
rw [isGenericPoint_def]
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_singleton]
rw [← PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_zero]
rfl
| instance functionField_isFractionRing_of_affine (R : CommRingCat.{u}) [IsDomain R] :
IsFractionRing R (Spec R).functionField := by
convert StructureSheaf.IsLocalization.to_stalk R (genericPoint (Spec R))
delta IsFractionRing IsLocalization.AtPrime
-- Porting note: `congr` does not work for `Iff`
apply Eq.to_iff
congr 1
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/FunctionField.lean | 115 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AdicCompletion.Algebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Basic
/-!
# Functoriality of adic completions
In this file we establish functorial properties of the adic completion.
## Main definitions
- `AdicCauchySequence.map I f`: the linear map on `I`-adic cauchy sequences induced by `f`
- `AdicCompletion.map I f`: the linear map on `I`-adic completions induced by `f`
## Main results
- `sumEquivOfFintype`: adic completion commutes with finite sums
- `piEquivOfFintype`: adic completion commutes with finite products
-/
suppress_compilation
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R)
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable {P : Type*} [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P]
variable {T : Type*} [AddCommGroup T] [Module (AdicCompletion I R) T]
namespace LinearMap
/-- `R`-linear version of `reduceModIdeal`. -/
private def reduceModIdealAux (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
M ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M) →ₗ[R] N ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N) :=
Submodule.mapQ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M) (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N) f
(fun x hx ↦ by
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on hx (fun r hr x _ ↦ ?_) (fun x y hx hy ↦ ?_)
· simp [Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr Submodule.mem_top]
· simp [Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy])
@[local simp]
private theorem reduceModIdealAux_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) :
(f.reduceModIdealAux I) (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) x) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N)) (f x) :=
rfl
/-- The induced linear map on the quotients mod `I • ⊤`. -/
def reduceModIdeal (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
M ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M) →ₗ[R ⧸ I] N ⧸ (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N) where
toFun := f.reduceModIdealAux I
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' r x := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn' r (fun r ↦ ?_)
refine Quotient.inductionOn' x (fun x ↦ ?_)
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.mk''_eq_mk, Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, Module.Quotient.mk_smul_mk,
Submodule.Quotient.mk_smul, LinearMapClass.map_smul, reduceModIdealAux_apply,
RingHomCompTriple.comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem reduceModIdeal_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) :
(f.reduceModIdeal I) (Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) x) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (I • ⊤ : Submodule R N)) (f x) :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace AdicCompletion
open LinearMap
theorem transitionMap_comp_reduceModIdeal (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) : transitionMap I N hmn ∘ₗ f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) =
(f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ m) : _ →ₗ[R] _) ∘ₗ transitionMap I M hmn := by
ext x
simp
namespace AdicCauchySequence
/-- A linear map induces a linear map on adic cauchy sequences. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : AdicCauchySequence I M →ₗ[R] AdicCauchySequence I N where
toFun a := ⟨fun n ↦ f (a n), fun {m n} hmn ↦ by
have hm : Submodule.map f (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R M) ≤ (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R N) := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'']
exact smul_mono_right _ le_top
apply SModEq.mono hm
apply SModEq.map (a.property hmn) f⟩
map_add' a b := by ext n; simp
map_smul' r a := by ext n; simp
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map I (LinearMap.id (M := M)) = LinearMap.id :=
rfl
theorem map_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
map I g ∘ₗ map I f = map I (g ∘ₗ f) :=
rfl
theorem map_comp_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (a : AdicCauchySequence I M) :
map I g (map I f a) = map I (g ∘ₗ f) a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : map I (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 :=
rfl
end AdicCauchySequence
/-- `R`-linear version of `adicCompletion`. -/
private def adicCompletionAux (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[R] AdicCompletion I N :=
AdicCompletion.lift I (fun n ↦ reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) f ∘ₗ AdicCompletion.eval I M n)
(fun {m n} hmn ↦ by rw [← comp_assoc, AdicCompletion.transitionMap_comp_reduceModIdeal,
comp_assoc, transitionMap_comp_eval])
@[local simp]
private theorem adicCompletionAux_val_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {n : ℕ} (x : AdicCompletion I M) :
(adicCompletionAux I f x).val n = f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) (x.val n) :=
rfl
/-- A linear map induces a map on adic completions. -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :
AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[AdicCompletion I R] AdicCompletion I N where
toFun := adicCompletionAux I f
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' r x := by
ext n
simp only [adicCompletionAux_val_apply, smul_eval, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.id_apply]
rw [val_smul_eq_evalₐ_smul, val_smul_eq_evalₐ_smul, map_smul]
@[simp]
theorem map_val_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N) {n : ℕ} (x : AdicCompletion I M) :
(map I f x).val n = f.reduceModIdeal (I ^ n) (x.val n) :=
rfl
/-- Equality of maps out of an adic completion can be checked on Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem map_ext {N} {f g : AdicCompletion I M → N}
(h : ∀ (a : AdicCauchySequence I M),
f (AdicCompletion.mk I M a) = g (AdicCompletion.mk I M a)) :
f = g := by
ext x
apply induction_on I M x h
/-- Equality of linear maps out of an adic completion can be checked on Cauchy sequences. -/
@[ext]
theorem map_ext' {f g : AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[AdicCompletion I R] T}
(h : ∀ (a : AdicCauchySequence I M),
f (AdicCompletion.mk I M a) = g (AdicCompletion.mk I M a)) :
f = g := by
ext x
apply induction_on I M x h
| /-- Equality of linear maps out of an adic completion can be checked on Cauchy sequences. -/
@[ext]
theorem map_ext'' {f g : AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[R] N}
(h : f.comp (AdicCompletion.mk I M) = g.comp (AdicCompletion.mk I M)) :
f = g := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdicCompletion/Functoriality.lean | 159 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.PreservesHomology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Injective.Basic
/-!
# Exact short complexes
When `S : ShortComplex C`, this file defines a structure
`S.Exact` which expresses the exactness of `S`, i.e. there
exists a homology data `h : S.HomologyData` such that
`h.left.H` is zero. When `[S.HasHomology]`, it is equivalent
to the assertion `IsZero S.homology`.
Almost by construction, this notion of exactness is self dual,
see `Exact.op` and `Exact.unop`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits ZeroObject Preadditive
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
namespace ShortComplex
section
variable
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- The assertion that the short complex `S : ShortComplex C` is exact. -/
structure Exact : Prop where
/-- the condition that there exists an homology data whose `left.H` field is zero -/
condition : ∃ (h : S.HomologyData), IsZero h.left.H
variable {S}
lemma Exact.hasHomology (h : S.Exact) : S.HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' h.condition.choose
lemma Exact.hasZeroObject (h : S.Exact) : HasZeroObject C :=
⟨h.condition.choose.left.H, h.condition.choose_spec⟩
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_homology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.homology := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨h', z⟩⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso z h'.left.homologyIso
· intro h
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff [S.HasHomology]
(h : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.H := by
rw [S.exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff h.homologyIso
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_isZero_leftHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.leftHomology :=
LeftHomologyData.exact_iff _
lemma exact_iff_isZero_rightHomology [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero S.rightHomology :=
RightHomologyData.exact_iff _
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.left.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact LeftHomologyData.exact_iff h.left
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff' (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ IsZero h.right.H := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
exact RightHomologyData.exact_iff h.right
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_homology_iso_zero [S.HasHomology] [HasZeroObject C] :
S.Exact ↔ Nonempty (S.homology ≅ 0) := by
rw [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isoZero⟩
· rintro ⟨e⟩
exact IsZero.of_iso (isZero_zero C) e
lemma exact_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h : S₁.Exact) : S₂.Exact := by
obtain ⟨⟨h, z⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨HomologyData.ofIso e h, z⟩⟩
lemma exact_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact :=
⟨exact_of_iso e, exact_of_iso e.symm⟩
lemma exact_and_mono_f_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Mono S₁.f ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Mono S₂.f := by
have : Mono S₁.f ↔ Mono S₂.f :=
(MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₁.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₁₂)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_and_epi_g_iff_of_iso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) :
S₁.Exact ∧ Epi S₁.g ↔ S₂.Exact ∧ Epi S₂.g := by
have : Epi S₁.g ↔ Epi S₂.g :=
(MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
(Arrow.isoMk (ShortComplex.π₂.mapIso e) (ShortComplex.π₃.mapIso e) e.hom.comm₂₃)
rw [exact_iff_of_iso e, this]
lemma exact_of_isZero_X₂ (h : IsZero S.X₂) : S.Exact := by
rw [(HomologyData.ofZeros S (IsZero.eq_of_tgt h _ _) (IsZero.eq_of_src h _ _)).exact_iff]
exact h
lemma exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, z₁⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁, z₁⟩
· rintro ⟨h₂, z₂⟩
exact ⟨HomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h₂, z₂⟩
variable {S}
lemma HomologyData.exact_iff_i_p_zero (h : S.HomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h.left.i ≫ h.right.p = 0 := by
haveI := HasHomology.mk' h
rw [h.left.exact_iff, ← h.comm]
constructor
· intro z
rw [IsZero.eq_of_src z h.iso.hom 0, zero_comp, comp_zero]
· intro eq
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.iso.hom, id_comp, ← cancel_mono h.right.ι,
← cancel_epi h.left.π, eq, zero_comp, comp_zero]
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_i_p_zero [S.HasHomology] (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData)
(h₂ : S.RightHomologyData) :
S.Exact ↔ h₁.i ≫ h₂.p = 0 :=
(HomologyData.ofIsIsoLeftRightHomologyComparison' h₁ h₂).exact_iff_i_p_zero
lemma exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero [S.HasHomology] :
S.Exact ↔ S.iCycles ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 :=
S.exact_iff_i_p_zero _ _
lemma exact_iff_kernel_ι_comp_cokernel_π_zero [S.HasHomology]
[HasKernel S.g] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ kernel.ι S.g ≫ cokernel.π S.f = 0 := by
haveI := HasLeftHomology.hasCokernel S
haveI := HasRightHomology.hasKernel S
exact S.exact_iff_i_p_zero (LeftHomologyData.ofHasKernelOfHasCokernel S)
(RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
variable {S}
lemma Exact.op (h : S.Exact) : S.op.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.op, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).op⟩⟩
lemma Exact.unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.Exact) : S.unop.Exact := by
obtain ⟨h, z⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨h.unop, (IsZero.of_iso z h.iso.symm).unop⟩⟩
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma exact_op_iff : S.op.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
⟨Exact.unop, Exact.op⟩
@[simp]
lemma exact_unop_iff (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) : S.unop.Exact ↔ S.Exact :=
S.unop.exact_op_iff.symm
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.LeftHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_map_iff (h : S.RightHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h.IsPreservedBy F] [(S.map F).HasHomology] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ IsZero (F.obj h.H) :=
(h.map F).exact_iff
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map_of_preservesRightHomologyOf (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have : S.HasHomology := h.hasHomology
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h
rw [S.rightHomologyData.exact_map_iff F, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
← F.map_id, h, F.map_zero]
lemma Exact.map (h : S.Exact) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] : (S.map F).Exact := by
have := h.hasHomology
exact h.map_of_preservesLeftHomologyOf F
variable (S)
lemma exact_map_iff_of_faithful [S.HasHomology]
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] [F.Faithful] :
(S.map F).Exact ↔ S.Exact := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero]
rw [(S.leftHomologyData.map F).exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero,
LeftHomologyData.map_H] at h
apply F.map_injective
rw [F.map_id, F.map_zero, h]
· intro h
exact h.map F
variable {S}
@[reassoc]
lemma Exact.comp_eq_zero (h : S.Exact) {X Y : C} {a : X ⟶ S.X₂} (ha : a ≫ S.g = 0)
{b : S.X₂ ⟶ Y} (hb : S.f ≫ b = 0) : a ≫ b = 0 := by
have := h.hasHomology
have eq := h
rw [exact_iff_iCycles_pOpcycles_zero] at eq
rw [← S.liftCycles_i a ha, ← S.p_descOpcycles b hb, assoc, reassoc_of% eq,
zero_comp, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.isZero_of_both_zeros (ex : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
IsZero S.X₂ :=
(ShortComplex.HomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg).exact_iff.1 ex
end
section Preadditive
variable [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D] (S : ShortComplex C)
lemma exact_iff_mono [HasZeroObject C] (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.Exact ↔ Mono S.g := by
constructor
· intro h
have := h.hasHomology
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology] at h
have := S.isIso_pOpcycles hf
have := mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ S.homologyIsKernel h
rw [← S.p_fromOpcycles]
apply mono_comp
· intro
rw [(HomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _
(KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero (KernelFork.ofι (0 : 0 ⟶ S.X₂) zero_comp)
inferInstance (isZero_zero C))).exact_iff]
exact isZero_zero C
lemma exact_iff_epi [HasZeroObject C] (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.Exact ↔ Epi S.f := by
constructor
· intro h
have := h.hasHomology
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology] at h
haveI := S.isIso_iCycles hg
haveI : Epi S.toCycles := epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ S.homologyIsCokernel h
rw [← S.toCycles_i]
apply epi_comp
· intro
rw [(HomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _
(CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero (CokernelCofork.ofπ (0 : S.X₂ ⟶ 0) comp_zero)
inferInstance (isZero_zero C))).exact_iff]
exact isZero_zero C
variable {S}
lemma Exact.epi_f' (hS : S.Exact) (h : LeftHomologyData S) : Epi h.f' :=
epi_of_isZero_cokernel' _ h.hπ (by
haveI := hS.hasHomology
dsimp
simpa only [← h.exact_iff] using hS)
lemma Exact.mono_g' (hS : S.Exact) (h : RightHomologyData S) : Mono h.g' :=
mono_of_isZero_kernel' _ h.hι (by
haveI := hS.hasHomology
dsimp
simpa only [← h.exact_iff] using hS)
lemma Exact.epi_toCycles (hS : S.Exact) [S.HasLeftHomology] : Epi S.toCycles :=
hS.epi_f' _
lemma Exact.mono_fromOpcycles (hS : S.Exact) [S.HasRightHomology] : Mono S.fromOpcycles :=
hS.mono_g' _
lemma LeftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f' [S.HasHomology] (h : LeftHomologyData S) :
S.Exact ↔ Epi h.f' := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact hS.epi_f' h
· intro
simp only [h.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_epi h.π, ← cancel_epi h.f',
comp_id, h.f'_π, comp_zero]
lemma RightHomologyData.exact_iff_mono_g' [S.HasHomology] (h : RightHomologyData S) :
S.Exact ↔ Mono h.g' := by
constructor
· intro hS
exact hS.mono_g' h
· intro
simp only [h.exact_iff, IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← cancel_mono h.ι, ← cancel_mono h.g',
id_comp, h.ι_g', zero_comp]
/-- Given an exact short complex `S` and a limit kernel fork `kf` for `S.g`, this is the
left homology data for `S` with `K := kf.pt` and `H := 0`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def Exact.leftHomologyDataOfIsLimitKernelFork
(hS : S.Exact) [HasZeroObject C] (kf : KernelFork S.g) (hkf : IsLimit kf) :
S.LeftHomologyData where
K := kf.pt
H := 0
i := kf.ι
π := 0
wi := kf.condition
hi := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hkf (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wπ := comp_zero
hπ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofEpiOfIsZero _ (by
have := hS.hasHomology
refine ((MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).1
hS.epi_toCycles
refine Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _)
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso S.cyclesIsKernel hkf) ?_
apply Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hkf
simp [IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]) (isZero_zero C)
/-- Given an exact short complex `S` and a colimit cokernel cofork `cc` for `S.f`, this is the
right homology data for `S` with `Q := cc.pt` and `H := 0`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def Exact.rightHomologyDataOfIsColimitCokernelCofork
(hS : S.Exact) [HasZeroObject C] (cc : CokernelCofork S.f) (hcc : IsColimit cc) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := cc.pt
H := 0
p := cc.π
ι := 0
wp := cc.condition
hp := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hcc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wι := zero_comp
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofMonoOfIsZero _ (by
have := hS.hasHomology
refine ((MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).2
hS.mono_fromOpcycles
refine Arrow.isoMk (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hcc S.opcyclesIsCokernel)
(Iso.refl _) ?_
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hcc
simp [IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]) (isZero_zero C)
variable (S)
lemma exact_iff_epi_toCycles [S.HasHomology] : S.Exact ↔ Epi S.toCycles :=
S.leftHomologyData.exact_iff_epi_f'
lemma exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles [S.HasHomology] : S.Exact ↔ Mono S.fromOpcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.exact_iff_mono_g'
lemma exact_iff_epi_kernel_lift [S.HasHomology] [HasKernel S.g] :
S.Exact ↔ Epi (kernel.lift S.g S.f S.zero) := by
rw [exact_iff_epi_toCycles]
apply (MorphismProperty.epimorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff
exact Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _) S.cyclesIsoKernel (by aesop_cat)
lemma exact_iff_mono_cokernel_desc [S.HasHomology] [HasCokernel S.f] :
S.Exact ↔ Mono (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero) := by
rw [exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles]
refine (MorphismProperty.monomorphisms C).arrow_mk_iso_iff (Iso.symm ?_)
exact Arrow.isoMk S.opcyclesIsoCokernel.symm (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
lemma QuasiIso.exact_iff {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasHomology] [S₂.HasHomology] [QuasiIso φ] : S₁.Exact ↔ S₂.Exact := by
simp only [exact_iff_isZero_homology]
exact Iso.isZero_iff (asIso (homologyMap φ))
lemma exact_of_f_is_kernel (hS : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι S.f S.zero))
[S.HasHomology] : S.Exact := by
rw [exact_iff_epi_toCycles]
have : IsSplitEpi S.toCycles :=
⟨⟨{ section_ := hS.lift (KernelFork.ofι S.iCycles S.iCycles_g)
id := by
rw [← cancel_mono S.iCycles, assoc, toCycles_i, id_comp]
exact Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hS }⟩⟩
infer_instance
lemma exact_of_g_is_cokernel (hS : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.g S.zero))
[S.HasHomology] : S.Exact := by
rw [exact_iff_mono_fromOpcycles]
have : IsSplitMono S.fromOpcycles :=
⟨⟨{ retraction := hS.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ S.pOpcycles S.f_pOpcycles)
id := by
rw [← cancel_epi S.pOpcycles, p_fromOpcycles_assoc, comp_id]
exact Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc hS }⟩⟩
infer_instance
variable {S}
lemma Exact.mono_g (hS : S.Exact) (hf : S.f = 0) : Mono S.g := by
have := hS.hasHomology
have := hS.epi_toCycles
have : S.iCycles = 0 := by rw [← cancel_epi S.toCycles, comp_zero, toCycles_i, hf]
apply Preadditive.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro A x₂ hx₂
rw [← S.liftCycles_i x₂ hx₂, this, comp_zero]
lemma Exact.epi_f (hS : S.Exact) (hg : S.g = 0) : Epi S.f := by
have := hS.hasHomology
| have := hS.mono_fromOpcycles
have : S.pOpcycles = 0 := by rw [← cancel_mono S.fromOpcycles, zero_comp, p_fromOpcycles, hg]
apply Preadditive.epi_of_cancel_zero
intro A x₂ hx₂
rw [← S.p_descOpcycles x₂ hx₂, this, zero_comp]
lemma Exact.mono_g_iff (hS : S.Exact) : Mono S.g ↔ S.f = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/Exact.lean | 437 | 443 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2.Init
/-!
# The symmetric square
This file defines the symmetric square, which is `α × α` modulo
swapping. This is also known as the type of unordered pairs.
More generally, the symmetric square is the second symmetric power
(see `Data.Sym.Basic`). The equivalence is `Sym2.equivSym`.
From the point of view that an unordered pair is equivalent to a
multiset of cardinality two (see `Sym2.equivMultiset`), there is a
`Mem` instance `Sym2.Mem`, which is a `Prop`-valued membership
test. Given `h : a ∈ z` for `z : Sym2 α`, then `Mem.other h` is the other
element of the pair, defined using `Classical.choice`. If `α` has
decidable equality, then `h.other'` computably gives the other element.
The universal property of `Sym2` is provided as `Sym2.lift`, which
states that functions from `Sym2 α` are equivalent to symmetric
two-argument functions from `α`.
Recall that an undirected graph (allowing self loops, but no multiple
edges) is equivalent to a symmetric relation on the vertex type `α`.
Given a symmetric relation on `α`, the corresponding edge set is
constructed by `Sym2.fromRel` which is a special case of `Sym2.lift`.
## Notation
The element `Sym2.mk (a, b)` can be written as `s(a, b)` for short.
## Tags
symmetric square, unordered pairs, symmetric powers
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Finset Function Sym
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace Sym2
/-- This is the relation capturing the notion of pairs equivalent up to permutations. -/
@[aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2]) [safe [constructors, cases], norm]]
inductive Rel (α : Type u) : α × α → α × α → Prop
| refl (x y : α) : Rel _ (x, y) (x, y)
| swap (x y : α) : Rel _ (x, y) (y, x)
attribute [refl] Rel.refl
@[symm]
theorem Rel.symm {x y : α × α} : Rel α x y → Rel α y x := by aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
@[trans]
theorem Rel.trans {x y z : α × α} (a : Rel α x y) (b : Rel α y z) : Rel α x z := by
aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
theorem Rel.is_equivalence : Equivalence (Rel α) :=
{ refl := fun (x, y) ↦ Rel.refl x y, symm := Rel.symm, trans := Rel.trans }
/-- One can use `attribute [local instance] Sym2.Rel.setoid` to temporarily
make `Quotient` functionality work for `α × α`. -/
def Rel.setoid (α : Type u) : Setoid (α × α) :=
⟨Rel α, Rel.is_equivalence⟩
@[simp]
theorem rel_iff' {p q : α × α} : Rel α p q ↔ p = q ∨ p = q.swap := by
aesop (rule_sets := [Sym2])
theorem rel_iff {x y z w : α} : Rel α (x, y) (z, w) ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp
end Sym2
|
/-- `Sym2 α` is the symmetric square of `α`, which, in other words, is the
| Mathlib/Data/Sym/Sym2.lean | 88 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ : ℝ) {r₂ : ℝ} (hr₂ : r₂ ≠ 0) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_ball_zero_iff,
map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r₁]
refine mul_lt_mul' hb ha (norm_nonneg _) (hr₂.lt_or_lt.resolve_left ?_)
exact ((apply_nonneg p b).trans hb).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
rcases eq_or_ne r₂ 0 with rfl | hr₂
· simp
· exact (smul_subset_smul_left (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _)).trans
(ball_smul_closedBall _ _ hr₂)
theorem closedBall_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
gcongr
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans ha
theorem neg_mem_ball_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ x ∈ ball p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_ball_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
theorem neg_mem_closedBall_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ x ∈ closedBall p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) : -ball p x r = ball p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_ball, mem_ball, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
-closedBall p x r = closedBall p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
end Module
end AddCommGroup
end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r : ℝ} {x : E}
theorem closedBall_iSup {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) (e : E)
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (⨆ i, p i) e r = ⋂ i, closedBall (p i) e r := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iSup_of_empty', iInter_of_empty, Seminorm.sSup_empty]
exact closedBall_bot _ hr
· ext x
have := Seminorm.bddAbove_range_iff.mp hp (x - e)
simp only [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter, Seminorm.iSup_apply hp, ciSup_le_iff this]
theorem ball_norm_mul_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) ⊆ k • p.ball 0 r := by
rcases eq_or_ne k 0 with (rfl | hk)
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, ball_eq_emptyset _ le_rfl]
exact empty_subset _
· intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_ball_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ←
mul_lt_mul_left <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk, ← mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖,
div_self (ne_of_gt <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self hk, one_smul]
theorem smul_ball_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
k • p.ball 0 r = p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
ext
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hk, p.mem_ball_zero, p.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul,
norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hk), mul_comm]
theorem smul_closedBall_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
k • p.closedBall 0 r ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, ← h, map_smul_eq_mul]
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
gcongr
theorem smul_closedBall_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : 0 < ‖k‖) :
k • p.closedBall 0 r = p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
refine subset_antisymm smul_closedBall_subset ?_
intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ← mul_le_mul_left hk, ← mul_assoc,
← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖, div_self (ne_of_gt hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self (norm_pos_iff.mp hk), one_smul]
theorem ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 < r₁) :
Absorbs 𝕜 (p.ball 0 r₁) (p.ball 0 r₂) := by
rcases exists_pos_lt_mul hr₁ r₂ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
refine .of_norm ⟨r, fun a ha x hx => ?_⟩
rw [smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr₀.trans_le ha), p.mem_ball_zero]
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hx
exact hx.trans (hr.trans_le <| by gcongr)
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p (0 : E) r) :=
absorbent_iff_forall_absorbs_singleton.2 fun _ =>
(p.ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr).mono_right <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 <| p.mem_ball_zero.2 <| lt_add_one _
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p (0 : E) r) :=
(p.absorbent_ball_zero hr).mono (p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_ball_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_ball.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_of_lt_sub_right hy)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_closedBall_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_closedBall.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans <| add_le_of_le_sub_right hy)
@[simp]
theorem smul_ball_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.ball y r = p.ball (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_ball, mem_ball, lt_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem smul_closedBall_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
end NormedField
section Convex
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E]
section SMul
variable [SMul ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- A seminorm is convex. Also see `convexOn_norm`. -/
protected theorem convexOn : ConvexOn ℝ univ p := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb _ => ?_⟩
calc
p (a • x + b • y) ≤ p (a • x) + p (b • y) := map_add_le_add p _ _
_ = ‖a • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p x + ‖b • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p y := by
rw [← map_smul_eq_mul p, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_one_smul, smul_one_smul]
_ = a * p x + b * p y := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one, mul_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg ha,
Real.norm_of_nonneg hb]
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Seminorm-balls are convex. -/
theorem convex_ball : Convex ℝ (ball p x r) := by
convert (p.convexOn.translate_left (-x)).convex_lt r
ext y
rw [preimage_univ, sep_univ, p.mem_ball, sub_eq_add_neg]
rfl
/-- Closed seminorm-balls are convex. -/
theorem convex_closedBall : Convex ℝ (closedBall p x r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_biInter_ball]
exact convex_iInter₂ fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _ _
end Module
end Convex
section RestrictScalars
variable (𝕜) {𝕜' : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedRing 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜']
[NormOneClass 𝕜'] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜' E] [SMul 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' E]
/-- Reinterpret a seminorm over a field `𝕜'` as a seminorm over a smaller field `𝕜`. This will
typically be used with `RCLike 𝕜'` and `𝕜 = ℝ`. -/
protected def restrictScalars (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p with
smul' := fun a x => by rw [← smul_one_smul 𝕜' a x, p.smul', norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : (p.restrictScalars 𝕜 : E → ℝ) = p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : (p.restrictScalars 𝕜).ball = p.ball :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) :
(p.restrictScalars 𝕜).closedBall = p.closedBall :=
rfl
end RestrictScalars
/-! ### Continuity criterions for seminorms -/
section Continuity
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedRing 𝕝] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [Module 𝕝 E]
/-- A seminorm is continuous at `0` if `p.closedBall 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.continuousAt_zero'`. -/
theorem continuousAt_zero_of_forall' [TopologicalSpace E] {p : Seminorm 𝕝 E}
(hp : ∀ r > 0, p.closedBall 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
ContinuousAt p 0 := by
simp_rw [Seminorm.closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall] at hp
rwa [ContinuousAt, Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.tendsto_right_iff, map_zero]
theorem continuousAt_zero' [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E}
{r : ℝ} (hp : p.closedBall 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) : ContinuousAt p 0 := by
refine continuousAt_zero_of_forall' fun ε hε ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨k, hk₀, hk⟩ : ∃ k : 𝕜, 0 < ‖k‖ ∧ ‖k‖ * r < ε := by
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with hr | hr
· use 1; simpa using hr.trans_lt hε
· simpa [lt_div_iff₀ hr] using exists_norm_lt 𝕜 (div_pos hε hr)
rw [← set_smul_mem_nhds_zero_iff (norm_pos_iff.1 hk₀), smul_closedBall_zero hk₀] at hp
exact mem_of_superset hp <| p.closedBall_mono hk.le
/-- A seminorm is continuous at `0` if `p.ball 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.continuousAt_zero'`. -/
theorem continuousAt_zero_of_forall [TopologicalSpace E] {p : Seminorm 𝕝 E}
(hp : ∀ r > 0, p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
ContinuousAt p 0 :=
continuousAt_zero_of_forall'
(fun r hr ↦ Filter.mem_of_superset (hp r hr) <| p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
theorem continuousAt_zero [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r : ℝ}
(hp : p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) : ContinuousAt p 0 :=
continuousAt_zero' (Filter.mem_of_superset hp <| p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
protected theorem uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E]
{p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : ContinuousAt p 0) : UniformContinuous p := by
have hp : Filter.Tendsto p (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := map_zero p ▸ hp
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero_swapped,
Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, Filter.tendsto_comap_iff]
exact
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds (hp.comp Filter.tendsto_comap)
(fun xy => dist_nonneg) fun xy => p.norm_sub_map_le_sub _ _
protected theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_zero [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
{p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : ContinuousAt p 0) : Continuous p := by
letI := IsTopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace E
haveI : IsUniformAddGroup E := isUniformAddGroup_of_addCommGroup
exact (Seminorm.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero hp).continuous
/-- A seminorm is uniformly continuous if `p.ball 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.uniformContinuous`. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_of_forall [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E]
{p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : ∀ r > 0, p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
UniformContinuous p :=
Seminorm.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero_of_forall hp)
protected theorem uniformContinuous [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E]
[ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r : ℝ} (hp : p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
UniformContinuous p :=
Seminorm.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero hp)
/-- A seminorm is uniformly continuous if `p.closedBall 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.uniformContinuous'`. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_of_forall' [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E]
{p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : ∀ r > 0, p.closedBall 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
UniformContinuous p :=
Seminorm.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero_of_forall' hp)
protected theorem uniformContinuous' [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E]
[ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r : ℝ}
(hp : p.closedBall 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) : UniformContinuous p :=
Seminorm.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero' hp)
/-- A seminorm is continuous if `p.ball 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.continuous`. -/
protected theorem continuous_of_forall [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
{p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : ∀ r > 0, p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
Continuous p :=
Seminorm.continuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero_of_forall hp)
protected theorem continuous [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
[ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r : ℝ} (hp : p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
Continuous p :=
Seminorm.continuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero hp)
/-- A seminorm is continuous if `p.closedBall 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0` for *all* `r > 0`.
Over a `NontriviallyNormedField` it is actually enough to check that this is true
for *some* `r`, see `Seminorm.continuous'`. -/
protected theorem continuous_of_forall' [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
{p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : ∀ r > 0, p.closedBall 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) :
Continuous p :=
Seminorm.continuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero_of_forall' hp)
protected theorem continuous' [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
[ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r : ℝ}
(hp : p.closedBall 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E)) : Continuous p :=
Seminorm.continuous_of_continuousAt_zero (continuousAt_zero' hp)
theorem continuous_of_le [TopologicalSpace E] [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
{p q : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hq : Continuous q) (hpq : p ≤ q) : Continuous p := by
refine Seminorm.continuous_of_forall (fun r hr ↦ Filter.mem_of_superset
(IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ <| q.mem_ball_self hr) (ball_antitone hpq))
rw [ball_zero_eq]
exact isOpen_lt hq continuous_const
lemma ball_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace E] {p : Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : Continuous p) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : p.ball 0 r ∈ (𝓝 0 : Filter E) :=
have this : Tendsto p (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0) := map_zero p ▸ hp.tendsto 0
by simpa only [p.ball_zero_eq] using this (Iio_mem_nhds hr)
lemma uniformSpace_eq_of_hasBasis
{ι} [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
{p' : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set E} (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (hb : (𝓝 0 : Filter E).HasBasis p' s)
(h₁ : ∃ r, p.closedBall 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0) (h₂ : ∀ i, p' i → ∃ r > 0, p.ball 0 r ⊆ s i) :
‹UniformSpace E› = p.toAddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup.toUniformSpace := by
refine IsUniformAddGroup.ext ‹_›
p.toAddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup.to_isUniformAddGroup ?_
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← @comap_norm_nhds_zero E p.toAddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup, ← tendsto_iff_comap]
suffices Continuous p from this.tendsto' 0 _ (map_zero p)
rcases h₁ with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact p.continuous' hr
· rw [(@NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt E
p.toAddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup).le_basis_iff hb]
simpa only [subset_def, mem_ball_zero] using h₂
lemma uniformity_eq_of_hasBasis
{ι} [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 E]
{p' : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set E} (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (hb : (𝓝 0 : Filter E).HasBasis p' s)
(h₁ : ∃ r, p.closedBall 0 r ∈ 𝓝 0) (h₂ : ∀ i, p' i → ∃ r > 0, p.ball 0 r ⊆ s i) :
𝓤 E = ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 {x | p (x.1 - x.2) < r} := by
rw [uniformSpace_eq_of_hasBasis p hb h₁ h₂]; rfl
end Continuity
section ShellLemmas
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- Let `p` be a seminorm on a vector space over a `NormedField`.
If there is a scalar `c` with `‖c‖>1`, then any `x` such that `p x ≠ 0` can be
moved by scalar multiplication to any `p`-shell of width `‖c‖`. Also recap information on the
value of `p` on the rescaling element that shows up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell_zpow (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {ε : ℝ}
(εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : p x ≠ 0) : ∃ n : ℤ, c^n ≠ 0 ∧
p (c^n • x) < ε ∧ (ε / ‖c‖ ≤ p (c^n • x)) ∧ (‖c^n‖⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * p x) := by
have xεpos : 0 < (p x)/ε := by positivity
rcases exists_mem_Ico_zpow xεpos hc with ⟨n, hn⟩
have cpos : 0 < ‖c‖ := by positivity
have cnpos : 0 < ‖c^(n+1)‖ := by rw [norm_zpow]; exact xεpos.trans hn.2
refine ⟨-(n+1), ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· show c ^ (-(n + 1)) ≠ 0; exact zpow_ne_zero _ (norm_pos_iff.1 cpos)
· show p ((c ^ (-(n + 1))) • x) < ε
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, zpow_neg, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ cnpos, mul_comm,
norm_zpow]
exact (div_lt_iff₀ εpos).1 (hn.2)
· show ε / ‖c‖ ≤ p (c ^ (-(n + 1)) • x)
rw [zpow_neg, div_le_iff₀ cpos, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, norm_zpow, zpow_add₀ (ne_of_gt cpos),
zpow_one, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_gt cpos),
one_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff₀ (zpow_pos cpos _), mul_comm]
exact (le_div_iff₀ εpos).1 hn.1
· show ‖(c ^ (-(n + 1)))‖⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * p x
have : ε⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * p x = ε⁻¹ * p x * ‖c‖ := by ring
rw [zpow_neg, norm_inv, inv_inv, norm_zpow, zpow_add₀ (ne_of_gt cpos), zpow_one, this,
← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hn.1 (norm_nonneg _)
/-- Let `p` be a seminorm on a vector space over a `NormedField`.
If there is a scalar `c` with `‖c‖>1`, then any `x` such that `p x ≠ 0` can be
moved by scalar multiplication to any `p`-shell of width `‖c‖`. Also recap information on the
value of `p` on the rescaling element that shows up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E}
(hx : p x ≠ 0) :
∃d : 𝕜, d ≠ 0 ∧ p (d • x) < ε ∧ (ε/‖c‖ ≤ p (d • x)) ∧ (‖d‖⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * p x) :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := p.rescale_to_shell_zpow hc εpos hx; ⟨_, hn⟩
/-- Let `p` and `q` be two seminorms on a vector space over a `NontriviallyNormedField`.
If we have `q x ≤ C * p x` on some shell of the form `{x | ε/‖c‖ ≤ p x < ε}` (where `ε > 0`
and `‖c‖ > 1`), then we also have `q x ≤ C * p x` for all `x` such that `p x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma bound_of_shell
(p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {ε C : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖)
(hf : ∀ x, ε / ‖c‖ ≤ p x → p x < ε → q x ≤ C * p x) {x : E} (hx : p x ≠ 0) :
q x ≤ C * p x := by
rcases p.rescale_to_shell hc ε_pos hx with ⟨δ, hδ, δxle, leδx, -⟩
simpa only [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm C, mul_le_mul_left (norm_pos_iff.2 hδ)]
using hf (δ • x) leδx δxle
/-- A version of `Seminorm.bound_of_shell` expressed using pointwise scalar multiplication of
seminorms. -/
lemma bound_of_shell_smul
(p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {ε : ℝ} {C : ℝ≥0} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖)
(hf : ∀ x, ε / ‖c‖ ≤ p x → p x < ε → q x ≤ (C • p) x) {x : E} (hx : p x ≠ 0) :
q x ≤ (C • p) x :=
Seminorm.bound_of_shell p q ε_pos hc hf hx
lemma bound_of_shell_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι)
(q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {ε : ℝ} {C : ℝ≥0} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖)
(hf : ∀ x, (∀ i ∈ s, p i x < ε) → ∀ j ∈ s, ε / ‖c‖ ≤ p j x → q x ≤ (C • p j) x)
{x : E} (hx : ∃ j, j ∈ s ∧ p j x ≠ 0) :
q x ≤ (C • s.sup p) x := by
rcases hx with ⟨j, hj, hjx⟩
have : (s.sup p) x ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt ((hjx.symm.lt_of_le <| apply_nonneg _ _).trans_le (le_finset_sup_apply hj))
refine (s.sup p).bound_of_shell_smul q ε_pos hc (fun y hle hlt ↦ ?_) this
rcases exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p ⟨j, hj⟩ y with ⟨i, hi, hiy⟩
rw [smul_apply, hiy]
exact hf y (fun k hk ↦ (le_finset_sup_apply hk).trans_lt hlt) i hi (hiy ▸ hle)
end ShellLemmas
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- Let `p i` be a family of seminorms on `E`. Let `s` be an absorbent set in `𝕜`.
If all seminorms are uniformly bounded at every point of `s`,
then they are bounded in the space of seminorms. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_absorbent {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Set E} (hs : Absorbent 𝕜 s)
| (h : ∀ x ∈ s, BddAbove (range (p · x))) : BddAbove (range p) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_range_iff]
intro x
obtain ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ : ∃ c ≠ 0, (c : 𝕜) • x ∈ s :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 1,266 | 1,269 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
/-!
# List duplicates
## Main definitions
* `List.Duplicate x l : Prop` is an inductive property that holds when `x` is a duplicate in `l`
## Implementation details
In this file, `x ∈+ l` notation is shorthand for `List.Duplicate x l`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
/-- Property that an element `x : α` of `l : List α` can be found in the list more than once. -/
inductive Duplicate (x : α) : List α → Prop
| cons_mem {l : List α} : x ∈ l → Duplicate x (x :: l)
| cons_duplicate {y : α} {l : List α} : Duplicate x l → Duplicate x (y :: l)
local infixl:50 " ∈+ " => List.Duplicate
variable {l : List α} {x : α}
theorem Mem.duplicate_cons_self (h : x ∈ l) : x ∈+ x :: l :=
Duplicate.cons_mem h
theorem Duplicate.duplicate_cons (h : x ∈+ l) (y : α) : x ∈+ y :: l :=
Duplicate.cons_duplicate h
theorem Duplicate.mem (h : x ∈+ l) : x ∈ l := by
induction h with
| cons_mem => exact mem_cons_self
| cons_duplicate _ hm => exact mem_cons_of_mem _ hm
theorem Duplicate.mem_cons_self (h : x ∈+ x :: l) : x ∈ l := by
obtain h | h := h
· exact h
· exact h.mem
@[simp]
theorem duplicate_cons_self_iff : x ∈+ x :: l ↔ x ∈ l :=
⟨Duplicate.mem_cons_self, Mem.duplicate_cons_self⟩
theorem Duplicate.ne_nil (h : x ∈+ l) : l ≠ [] := fun H => (mem_nil_iff x).mp (H ▸ h.mem)
@[simp]
theorem not_duplicate_nil (x : α) : ¬x ∈+ [] := fun H => H.ne_nil rfl
theorem Duplicate.ne_singleton (h : x ∈+ l) (y : α) : l ≠ [y] := by
induction h with
| cons_mem h => simp [ne_nil_of_mem h]
| cons_duplicate h => simp [ne_nil_of_mem h.mem]
@[simp]
theorem not_duplicate_singleton (x y : α) : ¬x ∈+ [y] := fun H => H.ne_singleton _ rfl
theorem Duplicate.elim_nil (h : x ∈+ []) : False :=
not_duplicate_nil x h
theorem Duplicate.elim_singleton {y : α} (h : x ∈+ [y]) : False :=
not_duplicate_singleton x y h
theorem duplicate_cons_iff {y : α} : x ∈+ y :: l ↔ y = x ∧ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈+ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain hm | hm := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨rfl, hm⟩
· exact Or.inr hm
· rcases h with (⟨rfl | h⟩ | h)
· simpa
· exact h.cons_duplicate
theorem Duplicate.of_duplicate_cons {y : α} (h : x ∈+ y :: l) (hx : x ≠ y) : x ∈+ l := by
simpa [duplicate_cons_iff, hx.symm] using h
theorem duplicate_cons_iff_of_ne {y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : x ∈+ y :: l ↔ x ∈+ l := by
simp [duplicate_cons_iff, hne.symm]
theorem Duplicate.mono_sublist {l' : List α} (hx : x ∈+ l) (h : l <+ l') : x ∈+ l' := by
induction h with
| slnil => exact hx
| cons y _ IH => exact (IH hx).duplicate_cons _
| cons₂ y h IH =>
rw [duplicate_cons_iff] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with (⟨rfl, hx⟩ | hx)
· simp [h.subset hx]
· simp [IH hx]
/-- The contrapositive of `List.nodup_iff_sublist`. -/
theorem duplicate_iff_sublist : x ∈+ l ↔ [x, x] <+ l := by
induction' l with y l IH
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx, cons_sublist_cons, singleton_sublist]
· rw [duplicate_cons_iff_of_ne hx, IH]
refine ⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist y, fun h => ?_⟩
cases h
· assumption
· contradiction
theorem nodup_iff_forall_not_duplicate : Nodup l ↔ ∀ x : α, ¬x ∈+ l := by
simp_rw [nodup_iff_sublist, duplicate_iff_sublist]
theorem exists_duplicate_iff_not_nodup : (∃ x : α, x ∈+ l) ↔ ¬Nodup l := by
simp [nodup_iff_forall_not_duplicate]
theorem Duplicate.not_nodup (h : x ∈+ l) : ¬Nodup l := fun H =>
nodup_iff_forall_not_duplicate.mp H _ h
theorem duplicate_iff_two_le_count [DecidableEq α] : x ∈+ l ↔ 2 ≤ count x l := by
simp [replicate_succ, duplicate_iff_sublist, le_count_iff_replicate_sublist]
instance decidableDuplicate [DecidableEq α] (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Decidable (x ∈+ l)
| [] => isFalse (not_duplicate_nil x)
| y :: l =>
match decidableDuplicate x l with
| isTrue h => isTrue (h.duplicate_cons y)
| isFalse h =>
if hx : y = x ∧ x ∈ l then isTrue (hx.left.symm ▸ List.Mem.duplicate_cons_self hx.right)
else isFalse (by simpa [duplicate_cons_iff, h] using hx)
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Duplicate.lean | 141 | 142 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt :) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩
rw [← IsPullback.paste_vert_iff this _, Category.comp_id]
exact (congr_app e j).symm
theorem IsUniversalColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα H
apply (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)))
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} : IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso (inv α) hc)
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)),
IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso α⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G] [ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(hc : IsUniversalColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun F' c' α f h hα H ↦
⟨isColimitOfReflects _ (hc (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G) (fun j ↦ (H j).map G)).some⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[∀ (i j : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ F.obj j) (g : i ⟶ j), PreservesLimit (cospan f (F.map g)) G]
[∀ (i : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) G]
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G]
[PreservesColimitsOfShape J G]
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(H : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f h hα
refine (Iff.trans ?_ (H (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G))).trans (forall_congr' fun j => ?_)
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨isColimitOfPreserves G h.some⟩, fun h => ⟨isColimitOfReflects G h.some⟩⟩
· exact IsPullback.map_iff G (NatTrans.congr_app h.symm j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.mapCocone_iff (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[G.IsEquivalence] : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G, fun hc ↦ by
let e : F ⋙ G ⋙ Functor.inv G ≅ F := NatIso.hcomp (Iso.refl F) G.asEquivalence.unitIso.symm
apply IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G.inv
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff e.inv).mp
exact hc.of_iso (Cocones.ext (G.asEquivalence.unitIso.app c.pt) (fun j => (by simp [e])))⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα H
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) ?_ using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· convert congr_arg (whiskerLeft e.inverse) e'
ext
simp
· intro k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsUniversalColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Cocone.whisker_pt, Cocone.whisker_ι,
whiskerLeft_app, NatTrans.comp_app, Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_hom_app, Functor.id_obj]
constructor
· intro H k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
· intro H j
have : α.app j
= F'.map (e.unit.app _) ≫ α.app _ ≫ F.map (e.counit.app (e.functor.obj j)) := by
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
rw [← Category.id_comp f, this]
refine IsPullback.paste_vert ?_ (H (e.functor.obj j))
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
· ext k
simpa using congr_app e' (e.inverse.obj k)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem isVanKampenColimit_of_evaluation [HasPullbacks D] [HasColimitsOfShape J D] (F : J ⥤ C ⥤ D)
(c : Cocone F) (hc : ∀ x : C, IsVanKampenColimit (((evaluation C D).obj x).mapCocone c)) :
IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f e hα
have := fun x => hc x (((evaluation C D).obj x).mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α _)
(((evaluation C D).obj x).map f)
(by
ext y
dsimp
exact NatTrans.congr_app (NatTrans.congr_app e y) x)
(hα.whiskerRight _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨hc'⟩ j
refine ⟨⟨(NatTrans.congr_app e j).symm⟩, ⟨evaluationJointlyReflectsLimits _ ?_⟩⟩
refine fun x => (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm ?_
exact ((this x).mp ⟨isColimitOfPreserves _ hc'⟩ _).isLimit
· exact fun H => ⟨evaluationJointlyReflectsColimits _ fun x =>
((this x).mpr fun j => (H j).map ((evaluation C D).obj x)).some⟩
end Functor
section reflective
theorem IsUniversalColimit.map_reflective
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
{F : J ⥤ D} {c : Cocone (F ⋙ Gr)}
(H : IsUniversalColimit c)
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)]
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)) Gl] :
IsUniversalColimit (Gl.mapCocone c) := by
have := adj.rightAdjoint_preservesLimits
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize.{u', v'} Gl := adj.leftAdjoint_preservesColimits
intros F' c' α f h hα hc'
have : HasPullback (Gl.map (Gr.map f)) (Gl.map (adj.unit.app c.pt)) :=
⟨⟨_, isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit _ pullback.condition
(IsPullback.of_hasPullback _ _).isLimit⟩⟩
let α' := α ≫ (Functor.associator _ _ _).hom ≫ whiskerLeft F adj.counit ≫ F.rightUnitor.hom
have hα' : NatTrans.Equifibered α' := hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)
have hadj : ∀ X, Gl.map (adj.unit.app X) = inv (adj.counit.app _) := by
intro X
apply IsIso.eq_inv_of_inv_hom_id
exact adj.left_triangle_components _
haveI : ∀ X, IsIso (Gl.map (adj.unit.app X)) := by
simp_rw [hadj]
infer_instance
have hα'' : ∀ j, Gl.map (Gr.map <| α'.app j) = adj.counit.app _ ≫ α.app j := by
intro j
rw [← cancel_mono (adj.counit.app <| F.obj j)]
dsimp [α']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Adjunction.counit_naturality_assoc, Category.id_comp,
Adjunction.counit_naturality, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp]
have hc'' : ∀ j, α.app j ≫ Gl.map (c.ι.app j) = c'.ι.app j ≫ f := NatTrans.congr_app h
let β := isoWhiskerLeft F' (asIso adj.counit) ≪≫ F'.rightUnitor
let c'' : Cocone (F' ⋙ Gr) := by
refine
{ pt := pullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app _)
ι := { app := fun j ↦ pullback.lift (Gr.map <| c'.ι.app j) (Gr.map (α'.app j) ≫ c.ι.app j) ?_
naturality := ?_ } }
· rw [← Gr.map_comp, ← hc'']
erw [← adj.unit_naturality]
rw [Gl.map_comp, hα'']
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp, adj.right_triangle_components_assoc]
· intros i j g
dsimp [α']
ext
all_goals simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc,
← Functor.map_comp, pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc]
· congr 1
exact c'.w _
· rw [α.naturality_assoc]
dsimp
rw [adj.counit_naturality, ← Category.assoc, Gr.map_comp_assoc]
congr 1
exact c.w _
let cf : (Cocones.precompose β.hom).obj c' ⟶ Gl.mapCocone c'' := by
refine { hom := pullback.lift ?_ f ?_ ≫ (PreservesPullback.iso _ _ _).inv, w := ?_ }
· exact inv <| adj.counit.app c'.pt
· simp [← cancel_mono (adj.counit.app <| Gl.obj c.pt)]
· intro j
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.comp_inv_eq]
ext
all_goals simp only [c'', PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst, PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd,
pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, Category.assoc,
Functor.mapCocone_ι_app, ← Gl.map_comp]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, adj.counit_naturality]
dsimp [β]
rw [Category.comp_id]
· rw [Gl.map_comp, hα'', Category.assoc, hc'']
dsimp [β]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc]
have :
cf.hom ≫ (PreservesPullback.iso _ _ _).hom ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ adj.counit.app _ = 𝟙 _ := by
simp only [cf, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Category.assoc,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc]
have : IsIso cf := by
apply @Cocones.cocone_iso_of_hom_iso (i := ?_)
rw [← IsIso.eq_comp_inv] at this
rw [this]
infer_instance
have ⟨Hc''⟩ := H c'' (whiskerRight α' Gr) (pullback.snd _ _) ?_ (hα'.whiskerRight Gr) ?_
· exact ⟨IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv β c' <|
(isColimitOfPreserves Gl Hc'').ofIsoColimit (asIso cf).symm⟩
· ext j
dsimp [c'']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc,
Functor.map_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
· intro j
apply IsPullback.of_right _ _ (IsPullback.of_hasPullback _ _)
· dsimp [α', c'']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp,
pullback.lift_fst]
rw [← Category.comp_id (Gr.map f)]
refine ((hc' j).map Gr).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨?_⟩)
rw [← adj.unit_naturality, Category.comp_id, ← Category.assoc,
← Category.id_comp (Gr.map ((Gl.mapCocone c).ι.app j))]
congr 1
rw [← cancel_mono (Gr.map (adj.counit.app (F.obj j)))]
dsimp
simp only [Category.comp_id, Adjunction.right_triangle_components, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
· dsimp [c'']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp,
pullback.lift_snd]
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.map_reflective [HasColimitsOfShape J C]
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
{F : J ⥤ D} {c : Cocone (F ⋙ Gr)} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)]
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)) Gl]
[∀ X i (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) Gl] :
IsVanKampenColimit (Gl.mapCocone c) := by
have := adj.rightAdjoint_preservesLimits
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize.{u', v'} Gl := adj.leftAdjoint_preservesColimits
intro F' c' α f h hα
refine ⟨?_, H.isUniversal.map_reflective adj c' α f h hα⟩
intro ⟨hc'⟩ j
let α' := α ≫ (Functor.associator _ _ _).hom ≫ whiskerLeft F adj.counit ≫ F.rightUnitor.hom
have hα' : NatTrans.Equifibered α' := hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)
have hα'' : ∀ j, Gl.map (Gr.map <| α'.app j) = adj.counit.app _ ≫ α.app j := by
intro j
rw [← cancel_mono (adj.counit.app <| F.obj j)]
dsimp [α']
simp only [Category.comp_id, Adjunction.counit_naturality_assoc, Category.id_comp,
Adjunction.counit_naturality, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp]
let β := isoWhiskerLeft F' (asIso adj.counit) ≪≫ F'.rightUnitor
let hl := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv β c').symm hc'
let hr := isColimitOfPreserves Gl (colimit.isColimit <| F' ⋙ Gr)
have : α.app j = β.inv.app _ ≫ Gl.map (Gr.map <| α'.app j) := by
rw [hα'']
simp [β]
rw [this]
have : f = (hl.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hr).hom ≫
Gl.map (colimit.desc _ ⟨_, whiskerRight α' Gr ≫ c.2⟩) := by
symm
convert @IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_desc _ _ _ _ ((F' ⋙ Gr) ⋙ Gl)
(Gl.mapCocone ⟨_, (whiskerRight α' Gr ≫ c.2 :)⟩) _ _ hl hr using 2
· apply hr.hom_ext
intro j
rw [hr.fac, Functor.mapCocone_ι_app, ← Gl.map_comp, colimit.cocone_ι, colimit.ι_desc]
rfl
· clear_value α'
apply hl.hom_ext
intro j
rw [hl.fac]
dsimp [β]
simp only [Category.comp_id, hα'', Category.assoc, Gl.map_comp]
congr 1
exact (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
rw [this]
have := ((H (colimit.cocone <| F' ⋙ Gr) (whiskerRight α' Gr)
(colimit.desc _ ⟨_, whiskerRight α' Gr ≫ c.2⟩) ?_ (hα'.whiskerRight Gr)).mp
⟨(getColimitCocone <| F' ⋙ Gr).2⟩ j).map Gl
· convert IsPullback.paste_vert _ this
refine IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨?_⟩
rw [← IsIso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.assoc, NatIso.inv_inv_app]
exact IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom hl hr _
· clear_value α'
ext j
simp
end reflective
section Initial
theorem hasStrictInitial_of_isUniversal [HasInitial C]
(H : IsUniversalColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 (⊥_ C)) (𝟙 (⊥_ C)))) : HasStrictInitialObjects C :=
hasStrictInitialObjects_of_initial_is_strict
(by
intro A f
suffices IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A)) by
obtain ⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩ := Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' this (f ≫ initial.to A) (𝟙 A)
rcases(Category.id_comp _).symm.trans h₂ with rfl
exact ⟨⟨_, ((Category.id_comp _).symm.trans h₁).symm, initialIsInitial.hom_ext _ _⟩⟩
refine (H (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)) (mapPair f f) f (by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp)
(mapPair_equifibered _) ?_).some
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;>
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨(Category.id_comp _).trans (Category.comp_id _).symm⟩)
theorem isVanKampenColimit_of_isEmpty [HasStrictInitialObjects C] [IsEmpty J] {F : J ⥤ C}
(c : Cocone F) (hc : IsColimit c) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
have : IsInitial c.pt := by
have := (IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv (Functor.uniqueFromEmpty _) _).symm
(hc.whiskerEquivalence (equivalenceOfIsEmpty (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) J))
exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit this (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl c.pt) (fun {X} ↦ isEmptyElim X))
replace this := IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit this
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff
(equivalenceOfIsEmpty (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) J)).mp
exact (this.precompose_isIso (Functor.uniqueFromEmpty
((equivalenceOfIsEmpty (Discrete PEmpty.{1}) J).functor ⋙ F)).hom).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
end Initial
section BinaryCoproduct
variable {X Y : C}
theorem BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
IsVanKampenColimit c ↔
∀ {X' Y' : C} (c' : BinaryCofan X' Y') (αX : X' ⟶ X) (αY : Y' ⟶ Y) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : αX ≫ c.inl = c'.inl ≫ f) (_ : αY ≫ c.inr = c'.inr ≫ f),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ IsPullback c'.inl αX f c.inl ∧ IsPullback c'.inr αY f c.inr := by
constructor
· introv H hαX hαY
rw [H c' (mapPair αX αY) f (by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> assumption) (mapPair_equifibered _)]
constructor
· intro H
exact ⟨H _, H _⟩
· rintro H ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [H.1, H.2]
· introv H F' hα h
let X' := F'.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
let Y' := F'.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
have : F' = pair X' Y' := by
apply Functor.hext
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩ <;> simp [X', Y']
clear_value X' Y'
subst this
change BinaryCofan X' Y' at c'
rw [H c' _ _ _ (NatTrans.congr_app hα ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩)
(NatTrans.congr_app hα ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)]
constructor
· rintro H ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [H.1, H.2]
· intro H
exact ⟨H _, H _⟩
theorem BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y)
(cofans : ∀ X Y : C, BinaryCofan X Y) (colimits : ∀ X Y, IsColimit (cofans X Y))
(cones : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), PullbackCone f g)
(limits : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), IsLimit (cones f g))
(h₁ : ∀ {X' Y' : C} (αX : X' ⟶ X) (αY : Y' ⟶ Y) (f : (cofans X' Y').pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : αX ≫ c.inl = (cofans X' Y').inl ≫ f) (_ : αY ≫ c.inr = (cofans X' Y').inr ≫ f),
IsPullback (cofans X' Y').inl αX f c.inl ∧ IsPullback (cofans X' Y').inr αY f c.inr)
(h₂ : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ c.pt),
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (cones f c.inl).fst (cones f c.inr).fst)) :
IsVanKampenColimit c := by
rw [BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff]
introv hX hY
constructor
· rintro ⟨h⟩
let e := h.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimits _ _)
obtain ⟨hl, hr⟩ := h₁ αX αY (e.inv ≫ f) (by simp [e, hX]) (by simp [e, hY])
constructor
· rw [← Category.id_comp αX, ← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc e f]
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 X') := inferInstance
have : c'.inl ≫ e.hom = 𝟙 X' ≫ (cofans X' Y').inl := by
dsimp [e]
simp
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨this⟩).paste_vert hl
· rw [← Category.id_comp αY, ← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc e f]
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 Y') := inferInstance
have : c'.inr ≫ e.hom = 𝟙 Y' ≫ (cofans X' Y').inr := by
dsimp [e]
simp
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨this⟩).paste_vert hr
· rintro ⟨H₁, H₂⟩
refine ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ?_ <| (isoBinaryCofanMk _).symm⟩
let e₁ : X' ≅ _ := H₁.isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limits _ _)
let e₂ : Y' ≅ _ := H₂.isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limits _ _)
have he₁ : c'.inl = e₁.hom ≫ (cones f c.inl).fst := by simp [e₁]
have he₂ : c'.inr = e₂.hom ≫ (cones f c.inr).fst := by simp [e₂]
rw [he₁, he₂]
exact (BinaryCofan.mk _ _).isColimitCompRightIso e₂.hom
((BinaryCofan.mk _ _).isColimitCompLeftIso e₁.hom (h₂ f))
theorem BinaryCofan.mono_inr_of_isVanKampen [HasInitial C] {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : Mono c.inr := by
refine PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId _ (IsPullback.isLimit ?_)
refine (h (BinaryCofan.mk (initial.to Y) (𝟙 Y)) (mapPair (initial.to X) (𝟙 Y)) c.inr ?_
(mapPair_equifibered _)).mp ⟨?_⟩ ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
· ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp; simp
· exact ((BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr initialIsInitial _).mpr (by
dsimp
infer_instance)).some
theorem BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen [HasInitial C] {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsPullback (initial.to _) (initial.to _) c.inl c.inr := by
refine ((h (BinaryCofan.mk (initial.to Y) (𝟙 Y)) (mapPair (initial.to X) (𝟙 Y)) c.inr ?_
(mapPair_equifibered _)).mp ⟨?_⟩ ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).flip
· ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp; simp
· exact ((BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr initialIsInitial _).mpr (by
dsimp
infer_instance)).some
end BinaryCoproduct
|
section FiniteCoproducts
theorem isUniversalColimit_extendCofan {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → C)
{c₁ : Cofan fun i : Fin n ↦ f i.succ} {c₂ : BinaryCofan (f 0) c₁.pt}
(t₁ : IsUniversalColimit c₁) (t₂ : IsUniversalColimit c₂)
[∀ {Z} (i : Z ⟶ c₂.pt), HasPullback c₂.inr i] :
IsUniversalColimit (extendCofan c₁ c₂) := by
intro F c α i e hα H
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 578 | 586 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
/-!
# Products of associated, prime, and irreducible elements.
This file contains some theorems relating definitions in `Algebra.Associated`
and products of multisets, finsets, and finsupps.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
-- the same local notation used in `Algebra.Associated`
local infixl:50 " ~ᵤ " => Associated
namespace Prime
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α}
theorem exists_mem_multiset_dvd (hp : Prime p) {s : Multiset α} : p ∣ s.prod → ∃ a ∈ s, p ∣ a :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun h => (hp.not_dvd_one h).elim) fun a s ih h =>
have : p ∣ a * s.prod := by simpa using h
match hp.dvd_or_dvd this with
| Or.inl h => ⟨a, Multiset.mem_cons_self a s, h⟩
| Or.inr h =>
let ⟨a, has, h⟩ := ih h
⟨a, Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem has, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_multiset_map_dvd (hp : Prime p) {s : Multiset β} {f : β → α} :
p ∣ (s.map f).prod → ∃ a ∈ s, p ∣ f a := fun h => by
simpa only [exists_prop, Multiset.mem_map, exists_exists_and_eq_and] using
hp.exists_mem_multiset_dvd h
theorem exists_mem_finset_dvd (hp : Prime p) {s : Finset β} {f : β → α} :
p ∣ s.prod f → ∃ i ∈ s, p ∣ f i :=
hp.exists_mem_multiset_map_dvd
end Prime
theorem Prod.associated_iff {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] {x z : M × N} :
x ~ᵤ z ↔ x.1 ~ᵤ z.1 ∧ x.2 ~ᵤ z.2 :=
⟨fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨⟨(MulEquiv.prodUnits.toFun u).1, (Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 hu).1⟩,
⟨(MulEquiv.prodUnits.toFun u).2, (Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 hu).2⟩⟩,
fun ⟨⟨u₁, h₁⟩, ⟨u₂, h₂⟩⟩ =>
⟨MulEquiv.prodUnits.invFun (u₁, u₂), Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩⟩
theorem Associated.prod {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → M)
(g : ι → M) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → (f i) ~ᵤ (g i)) : (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ~ᵤ (∏ i ∈ s, g i) := by
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty =>
simp only [Finset.prod_empty]
rfl
| insert j s hjs IH =>
classical
convert_to (∏ i ∈ insert j s, f i) ~ᵤ (∏ i ∈ insert j s, g i)
rw [Finset.prod_insert hjs, Finset.prod_insert hjs]
exact Associated.mul_mul (h j (Finset.mem_insert_self j s))
(IH (fun i hi ↦ h i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)))
theorem exists_associated_mem_of_dvd_prod [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {p : α} (hp : Prime p)
{s : Multiset α} : (∀ r ∈ s, Prime r) → p ∣ s.prod → ∃ q ∈ s, p ~ᵤ q :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp [mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 hp.not_unit]) fun a s ih hs hps => by
rw [Multiset.prod_cons] at hps
rcases hp.dvd_or_dvd hps with h | h
· have hap := hs a (Multiset.mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl))
exact ⟨a, Multiset.mem_cons_self a _, hp.associated_of_dvd hap h⟩
· rcases ih (fun r hr => hs _ (Multiset.mem_cons.2 (Or.inr hr))) h with ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂⟩
exact ⟨q, Multiset.mem_cons.2 (Or.inr hq₁), hq₂⟩
open Submonoid in
/-- Let x, y ∈ α. If x * y can be written as a product of units and prime elements, then x can be
written as a product of units and prime elements. -/
theorem divisor_closure_eq_closure [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
(x y : α) (hxy : x * y ∈ closure { r : α | IsUnit r ∨ Prime r}) :
x ∈ closure { r : α | IsUnit r ∨ Prime r} := by
obtain ⟨m, hm, hprod⟩ := exists_multiset_of_mem_closure hxy
induction m using Multiset.induction generalizing x y with
| empty =>
apply subset_closure
simp only [Set.mem_setOf]
simp only [Multiset.prod_zero] at hprod
left; exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hprod.symm
| cons c s hind =>
simp only [Multiset.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp, Set.mem_setOf] at hm
simp only [Multiset.prod_cons] at hprod
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hind
obtain ⟨ha₁ | ha₂, hs⟩ := hm
· rcases ha₁.exists_right_inv with ⟨k, hk⟩
refine hind x (y*k) ?_ hs ?_
· simp only [← mul_assoc, ← hprod, ← Multiset.prod_cons, mul_comm]
refine multiset_prod_mem _ _ (Multiset.forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨subset_closure (Set.mem_def.2 ?_),
Multiset.forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨subset_closure (Set.mem_def.2 ?_), (fun t ht =>
subset_closure (hs t ht))⟩⟩)
· left; exact isUnit_of_mul_eq_one_right _ _ hk
· left; exact ha₁
· rw [← mul_one s.prod, ← hk, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_right_iff, mul_comm]
left; exact hprod
· rcases ha₂.dvd_mul.1 (Dvd.intro _ hprod) with ⟨c, hc⟩ | ⟨c, hc⟩
· rw [hc]; rw [hc, mul_assoc] at hprod
refine Submonoid.mul_mem _ (subset_closure (Set.mem_def.2 ?_))
(hind _ _ ?_ hs (mul_left_cancel₀ ha₂.ne_zero hprod))
· right; exact ha₂
rw [← mul_left_cancel₀ ha₂.ne_zero hprod]
exact multiset_prod_mem _ _ (fun t ht => subset_closure (hs t ht))
rw [hc, mul_comm x _, mul_assoc, mul_comm c _] at hprod
refine hind x c ?_ hs (mul_left_cancel₀ ha₂.ne_zero hprod)
rw [← mul_left_cancel₀ ha₂.ne_zero hprod]
exact multiset_prod_mem _ _ (fun t ht => subset_closure (hs t ht))
theorem Multiset.prod_primes_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
[∀ a : α, DecidablePred (Associated a)] {s : Multiset α} (n : α) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, Prime a)
(div : ∀ a ∈ s, a ∣ n) (uniq : ∀ a, s.countP (Associated a) ≤ 1) : s.prod ∣ n := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on generalizing n with
| empty => simp only [Multiset.prod_zero, one_dvd]
| cons a s induct =>
rw [Multiset.prod_cons]
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ : a ∣ n := div a (Multiset.mem_cons_self a s)
apply mul_dvd_mul_left a
refine induct _ (fun a ha => h a (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha)) (fun b b_in_s => ?_)
fun a => (Multiset.countP_le_of_le _ (Multiset.le_cons_self _ _)).trans (uniq a)
have b_div_n := div b (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem b_in_s)
have a_prime := h a (Multiset.mem_cons_self a s)
have b_prime := h b (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem b_in_s)
refine (b_prime.dvd_or_dvd b_div_n).resolve_left fun b_div_a => ?_
have assoc := b_prime.associated_of_dvd a_prime b_div_a
have := uniq a
rw [Multiset.countP_cons_of_pos _ (Associated.refl _), Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, ← not_lt,
Multiset.countP_pos] at this
exact this ⟨b, b_in_s, assoc.symm⟩
theorem Finset.prod_primes_dvd [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [Subsingleton αˣ] {s : Finset α} (n : α)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, Prime a) (div : ∀ a ∈ s, a ∣ n) : (∏ p ∈ s, p) ∣ n := by
classical
exact
Multiset.prod_primes_dvd n (by simpa only [Multiset.map_id', Finset.mem_def] using h)
| (by simpa only [Multiset.map_id', Finset.mem_def] using div)
(by
simp only [Multiset.map_id', associated_eq_eq, Multiset.countP_eq_card_filter,
← s.val.count_eq_card_filter_eq, ← Multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one, s.nodup])
namespace Associates
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Associated.lean | 145 | 150 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SeparableDegree
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsSepClosed
/-!
# Separable closure
This file contains basics about the (relative) separable closure of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `separableClosure`: the relative separable closure of `F` in `E`, or called maximal separable
subextension of `E / F`, is defined to be the intermediate field of `E / F` consisting of all
separable elements.
- `SeparableClosure`: the absolute separable closure, defined to be the relative separable
closure inside the algebraic closure.
- `Field.sepDegree F E`: the (infinite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the degree of `separableClosure F E / F`. Later we will show
that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`, not in this file), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite, then this
coincides with `Field.finSepDegree F E`.
- `Field.insepDegree F E`: the (infinite) inseparable degree $[E:F]_i$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the degree of `E / separableClosure F E`.
- `Field.finInsepDegree F E`: the finite inseparable degree $[E:F]_i$ of an algebraic extension
`E / F` of fields, defined to be the degree of `E / separableClosure F E` as a natural number.
It is zero if such field extension is not finite.
## Main results
- `le_separableClosure_iff`: an intermediate field of `E / F` is contained in the
separable closure of `F` in `E` if and only if it is separable over `F`.
- `separableClosure.normalClosure_eq_self`: the normal closure of the separable
closure of `F` in `E` is equal to itself.
- `separableClosure.isGalois`: the separable closure in a normal extension is Galois
(namely, normal and separable).
- `separableClosure.isSepClosure`: the separable closure in a separably closed extension
is a separable closure of the base field.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_iff_isSeparable`: `F(S) / F` is a separable extension if and
only if all elements of `S` are separable elements.
- `separableClosure.eq_top_iff`: the separable closure of `F` in `E` is equal to `E`
if and only if `E / F` is separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, separable closure
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
section separableClosure
/-- The (relative) separable closure of `F` in `E`, or called maximal separable subextension
of `E / F`, is defined to be the intermediate field of `E / F` consisting of all separable
elements. The previous results prove that these elements are closed under field operations. -/
@[stacks 09HC]
def separableClosure : IntermediateField F E where
carrier := {x | IsSeparable F x}
mul_mem' := isSeparable_mul
add_mem' := isSeparable_add
algebraMap_mem' := isSeparable_algebraMap E
inv_mem' _ := isSeparable_inv
variable {F E K}
/-- An element is contained in the separable closure of `F` in `E` if and only if
it is a separable element. -/
theorem mem_separableClosure_iff {x : E} :
x ∈ separableClosure F E ↔ IsSeparable F x := Iff.rfl
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra homomorphism from `E` to `K`, then `i x` is contained in
`separableClosure F K` if and only if `x` is contained in `separableClosure F E`. -/
theorem map_mem_separableClosure_iff (i : E →ₐ[F] K) {x : E} :
i x ∈ separableClosure F K ↔ x ∈ separableClosure F E := by
simp_rw [mem_separableClosure_iff, IsSeparable, minpoly.algHom_eq i i.injective]
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra homomorphism from `E` to `K`, then the preimage of
`separableClosure F K` under the map `i` is equal to `separableClosure F E`. -/
theorem separableClosure.comap_eq_of_algHom (i : E →ₐ[F] K) :
(separableClosure F K).comap i = separableClosure F E := by
ext x
exact map_mem_separableClosure_iff i
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra homomorphism from `E` to `K`, then the image of `separableClosure F E`
under the map `i` is contained in `separableClosure F K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.map_le_of_algHom (i : E →ₐ[F] K) :
(separableClosure F E).map i ≤ separableClosure F K :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (comap_eq_of_algHom i).ge
variable (F) in
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` has no non-trivial separable
subextensions (when `K / E` is algebraic, this means that it is purely inseparable),
then the image of `separableClosure F E` in `K` is equal to `separableClosure F K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.map_eq_of_separableClosure_eq_bot [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
(h : separableClosure E K = ⊥) :
(separableClosure F E).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E K) = separableClosure F K := by
refine le_antisymm (map_le_of_algHom _) (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 <| h ▸ mem_separableClosure_iff.2
(IsSeparable.tower_top E <| mem_separableClosure_iff.1 hx)
exact ⟨y, (map_mem_separableClosure_iff <| IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E K).mp hx, rfl⟩
/-- If `i` is an `F`-algebra isomorphism of `E` and `K`, then the image of `separableClosure F E`
under the map `i` is equal to `separableClosure F K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.map_eq_of_algEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
(separableClosure F E).map i = separableClosure F K :=
(map_le_of_algHom i.toAlgHom).antisymm
(fun x h ↦ ⟨_, (map_mem_separableClosure_iff i.symm).2 h, by simp⟩)
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then `separableClosure F E` and
`separableClosure F K` are also isomorphic as `F`-algebras. -/
def separableClosure.algEquivOfAlgEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
separableClosure F E ≃ₐ[F] separableClosure F K :=
(intermediateFieldMap i _).trans (equivOfEq (map_eq_of_algEquiv i))
alias AlgEquiv.separableClosure := separableClosure.algEquivOfAlgEquiv
variable (F E K)
/-- The separable closure of `F` in `E` is algebraic over `F`. -/
instance separableClosure.isAlgebraic : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (separableClosure F E) :=
⟨fun x ↦ isAlgebraic_iff.2 (IsSeparable.isIntegral x.2).isAlgebraic⟩
/-- The separable closure of `F` in `E` is separable over `F`. -/
@[stacks 030K "$E_{sep}/F$ is separable"]
instance separableClosure.isSeparable : Algebra.IsSeparable F (separableClosure F E) :=
⟨fun x ↦ by simpa only [IsSeparable, minpoly_eq] using x.2⟩
/-- An intermediate field of `E / F` is contained in the separable closure of `F` in `E`
if all of its elements are separable over `F`. -/
theorem le_separableClosure' {L : IntermediateField F E} (hs : ∀ x : L, IsSeparable F x) :
L ≤ separableClosure F E := fun x h ↦ by simpa only [IsSeparable, minpoly_eq] using hs ⟨x, h⟩
/-- An intermediate field of `E / F` is contained in the separable closure of `F` in `E`
if it is separable over `F`. -/
theorem le_separableClosure (L : IntermediateField F E) [Algebra.IsSeparable F L] :
L ≤ separableClosure F E := le_separableClosure' F E (Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable F)
/-- An intermediate field of `E / F` is contained in the separable closure of `F` in `E`
if and only if it is separable over `F`. -/
theorem le_separableClosure_iff (L : IntermediateField F E) :
L ≤ separableClosure F E ↔ Algebra.IsSeparable F L :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ by simpa only [IsSeparable, minpoly_eq] using h x.2⟩,
fun _ ↦ le_separableClosure _ _ _⟩
/-- The separable closure in `E` of the separable closure of `F` in `E` is equal to itself. -/
theorem separableClosure.separableClosure_eq_bot :
separableClosure (separableClosure F E) E = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun x hx ↦ mem_bot.2
⟨⟨x, IsSeparable.of_algebra_isSeparable_of_isSeparable F (mem_separableClosure_iff.1 hx)⟩, rfl⟩
/-- The normal closure in `E/F` of the separable closure of `F` in `E` is equal to itself. -/
theorem separableClosure.normalClosure_eq_self :
normalClosure F (separableClosure F E) E = separableClosure F E :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_iff.2 fun i ↦
have : Algebra.IsSeparable F i.fieldRange :=
(AlgEquiv.Algebra.isSeparable (AlgEquiv.ofInjectiveField i))
le_separableClosure F E _) (le_normalClosure _)
/-- If `E` is normal over `F`, then the separable closure of `F` in `E` is Galois (i.e.
normal and separable) over `F`. -/
@[stacks 0EXK]
instance separableClosure.isGalois [Normal F E] : IsGalois F (separableClosure F E) where
to_isSeparable := separableClosure.isSeparable F E
to_normal := by
rw [← separableClosure.normalClosure_eq_self]
exact normalClosure.normal F _ E
/-- If `E / F` is a field extension and `E` is separably closed, then the separable closure
of `F` in `E` is equal to `F` if and only if `F` is separably closed. -/
theorem IsSepClosed.separableClosure_eq_bot_iff [IsSepClosed E] :
separableClosure F E = ⊥ ↔ IsSepClosed F := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ IsSepClosed.of_exists_root _ fun p _ hirr hsep ↦ ?_,
fun _ ↦ IntermediateField.eq_bot_of_isSepClosed_of_isSeparable _⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsSepClosed.exists_aeval_eq_zero E p (degree_pos_of_irreducible hirr).ne' hsep
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ▸ mem_separableClosure_iff.2 (hsep.of_dvd <| minpoly.dvd _ x hx)
exact ⟨x, by simpa [Algebra.ofId_apply] using hx⟩
/-- If `E` is separably closed, then the separable closure of `F` in `E` is an absolute
separable closure of `F`. -/
instance separableClosure.isSepClosure [IsSepClosed E] : IsSepClosure F (separableClosure F E) :=
⟨(IsSepClosed.separableClosure_eq_bot_iff _ E).mp (separableClosure.separableClosure_eq_bot F E),
isSeparable F E⟩
/-- The absolute separable closure is defined to be the relative separable closure inside the
algebraic closure. It is indeed a separable closure (`IsSepClosure`) by
`separableClosure.isSepClosure`, and it is Galois (`IsGalois`) by `separableClosure.isGalois`
or `IsSepClosure.isGalois`, and every separable extension embeds into it (`IsSepClosed.lift`). -/
abbrev SeparableClosure : Type _ := separableClosure F (AlgebraicClosure F)
/-- `F(S) / F` is a separable extension if and only if all elements of `S` are
separable elements. -/
theorem IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_iff_isSeparable {S : Set E} :
Algebra.IsSeparable F (adjoin F S) ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, IsSeparable F x :=
(le_separableClosure_iff F E _).symm.trans adjoin_le_iff
/-- The separable closure of `F` in `E` is equal to `E` if and only if `E / F` is
separable. -/
theorem separableClosure.eq_top_iff : separableClosure F E = ⊤ ↔ Algebra.IsSeparable F E :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ mem_separableClosure_iff.1 (h ▸ mem_top)⟩,
fun _ ↦ top_unique fun x _ ↦ mem_separableClosure_iff.2 (Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable _ x)⟩
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, then `separableClosure F K` is contained in
`separableClosure E K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.le_restrictScalars [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] :
separableClosure F K ≤ (separableClosure E K).restrictScalars F :=
fun _ ↦ IsSeparable.tower_top E
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `E / F` is separable, then
`separableClosure F K` is equal to `separableClosure E K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.eq_restrictScalars_of_isSeparable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
[Algebra.IsSeparable F E] : separableClosure F K = (separableClosure E K).restrictScalars F :=
(separableClosure.le_restrictScalars F E K).antisymm fun _ h ↦
IsSeparable.of_algebra_isSeparable_of_isSeparable F h
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, then `E` adjoin `separableClosure F K` is contained
in `separableClosure E K`. -/
theorem separableClosure.adjoin_le [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] :
adjoin E (separableClosure F K) ≤ separableClosure E K :=
adjoin_le_iff.2 <| le_restrictScalars F E K
/-- A compositum of two separable extensions is separable. -/
instance IntermediateField.isSeparable_sup (L1 L2 : IntermediateField F E)
[h1 : Algebra.IsSeparable F L1] [h2 : Algebra.IsSeparable F L2] :
Algebra.IsSeparable F (L1 ⊔ L2 : IntermediateField F E) := by
rw [← le_separableClosure_iff] at h1 h2 ⊢
exact sup_le h1 h2
/-- A compositum of separable extensions is separable. -/
instance IntermediateField.isSeparable_iSup {ι : Type*} {t : ι → IntermediateField F E}
[h : ∀ i, Algebra.IsSeparable F (t i)] :
Algebra.IsSeparable F (⨆ i, t i : IntermediateField F E) := by
simp_rw [← le_separableClosure_iff] at h ⊢
exact iSup_le h
end separableClosure
namespace Field
/-- The (infinite) separable degree for a general field extension `E / F` is defined
to be the degree of `separableClosure F E / F`. -/
@[stacks 030L "Part 1"]
def sepDegree := Module.rank F (separableClosure F E)
/-- The (infinite) inseparable degree for a general field extension `E / F` is defined
to be the degree of `E / separableClosure F E`. -/
@[stacks 030L "Part 2"]
def insepDegree := Module.rank (separableClosure F E) E
/-- The finite inseparable degree for a general field extension `E / F` is defined
to be the degree of `E / separableClosure F E` as a natural number. It is defined to be zero
if such field extension is infinite. -/
def finInsepDegree : ℕ := finrank (separableClosure F E) E
theorem finInsepDegree_def' : finInsepDegree F E = Cardinal.toNat (insepDegree F E) := rfl
instance instNeZeroSepDegree : NeZero (sepDegree F E) := ⟨rank_pos.ne'⟩
instance instNeZeroInsepDegree : NeZero (insepDegree F E) := ⟨rank_pos.ne'⟩
instance instNeZeroFinInsepDegree [FiniteDimensional F E] :
NeZero (finInsepDegree F E) := ⟨finrank_pos.ne'⟩
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same
separable degree over `F`. -/
theorem lift_sepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (sepDegree F E) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (sepDegree F K) :=
i.separableClosure.toLinearEquiv.lift_rank_eq
/-- The same-universe version of `Field.lift_sepDegree_eq_of_equiv`. -/
theorem sepDegree_eq_of_equiv (K : Type v) [Field K] [Algebra F K] (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
sepDegree F E = sepDegree F K :=
i.separableClosure.toLinearEquiv.rank_eq
/-- The separable degree multiplied by the inseparable degree is equal
to the (infinite) field extension degree. -/
theorem sepDegree_mul_insepDegree : sepDegree F E * insepDegree F E = Module.rank F E :=
rank_mul_rank F (separableClosure F E) E
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same
inseparable degree over `F`. -/
theorem lift_insepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (insepDegree F E) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (insepDegree F K) :=
Algebra.lift_rank_eq_of_equiv_equiv i.separableClosure i rfl
/-- The same-universe version of `Field.lift_insepDegree_eq_of_equiv`. -/
theorem insepDegree_eq_of_equiv (K : Type v) [Field K] [Algebra F K] (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
insepDegree F E = insepDegree F K :=
Algebra.rank_eq_of_equiv_equiv i.separableClosure i rfl
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same finite
inseparable degree over `F`. -/
theorem finInsepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
finInsepDegree F E = finInsepDegree F K := by
simpa only [Cardinal.toNat_lift] using congr_arg Cardinal.toNat
(lift_insepDegree_eq_of_equiv F E K i)
@[simp]
theorem sepDegree_self : sepDegree F F = 1 := by
rw [sepDegree, Subsingleton.elim (separableClosure F F) ⊥, IntermediateField.rank_bot]
@[simp]
theorem insepDegree_self : insepDegree F F = 1 := by
rw [insepDegree, Subsingleton.elim (separableClosure F F) ⊤, IntermediateField.rank_top]
@[simp]
theorem finInsepDegree_self : finInsepDegree F F = 1 := by
rw [finInsepDegree_def', insepDegree_self, Cardinal.one_toNat]
end Field
|
namespace IntermediateField
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableClosure.lean | 330 | 332 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
/-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
variable [CharZero K]
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338
We name `hcycl` so it can be used as a named argument,
but since https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338, this is considered unused,
so we need to disable the linter. -/
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- The ring of integers of a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance _root_.IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p`-th
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
integralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
integralPowerBasis_gen (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem power_basis_int'_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.dim = φ p := by
rw [integralPowerBasis', integralPowerBasis_dim (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one]),
pow_one]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p ^ k` cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin' hζ.integralPowerBasis (RingOfIntegers.isIntegral _)
(by
simp only [integralPowerBasis_gen, toInteger]
convert Subalgebra.add_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ (⟨ζ - 1, _⟩ : 𝓞 K))
(Subalgebra.one_mem _)
· simp
· exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (by simp)) (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen =
⟨ζ - 1, Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ := by
simp [subOneIntegralPowerBasis]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger - 1 :=
-- The `unusedHavesSuffices` linter incorrectly thinks this `have` is unnecessary.
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `p ≠ 2` and `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ hp.out.one_lt (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
convert Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (PNat.pos _)) hodd
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ (by decide) (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
cases k
· convert Prime.neg Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_neg, map_ofNat]
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one, AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, OneMemClass.coe_one,
pow_zero]
using hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat
(by simp only [zero_add, pow_one, Nat.ofNat_pos]))
convert Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_two Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp))
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) : Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
by_cases htwo : p = 2
· subst htwo
apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow
· apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two htwo
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime' [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
Prime ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
convert zeta_sub_one_prime (k := 0) (by simpa only [zero_add, pow_one])
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen := by
| simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime'
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 358 | 361 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Map
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.LinearMap
/-!
# `map` and `comap` for `Submodule`s
## Main declarations
* `Submodule.map`: The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.comap`: The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂`
* `Submodule.giMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective.
* `Submodule.gciMapComap`: `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective.
## Tags
submodule, subspace, linear map, pushforward, pullback
-/
open Function Pointwise Set
variable {R : Type*} {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable (p p' : Submodule R M) (q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂)
variable {x : M}
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule `p ⊆ M` by `f : M → M₂` -/
def map (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.map f with
carrier := f '' p
smul_mem' := by
rintro c x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := σ₁₂.surjective c
exact ⟨_, p.smul_mem a hy, map_smulₛₗ f _ _⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : (map f p : Set M₂) = f '' p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_toLinearMap (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : map (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = map f p := rfl
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map (f : M →+ M₂) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem map_toAddSubmonoid' (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubmonoid = p.toAddSubmonoid.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_map {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).map f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MonoidHom.coe_toAdditive_map {G G₂ : Type*} [Group G] [Group G₂] (f : G →* G₂)
(s : Subgroup G) :
s.toAddSubgroup.map (MonoidHom.toAdditive f) = Subgroup.toAddSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toMultiplicative_map {G G₂ : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddGroup G₂]
(f : G →+ G₂) (s : AddSubgroup G) :
s.toSubgroup.map (AddMonoidHom.toMultiplicative f) = AddSubgroup.toSubgroup (s.map f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {x : M₂} : x ∈ map f p ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ p ∧ f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_map_of_mem {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {r} (h : r ∈ p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) {p : Submodule R M} (r : p) : f r ∈ map f p :=
mem_map_of_mem r.prop
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
Submodule.ext fun a => by simp
theorem map_comp [RingHomSurjective σ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective σ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R M) : map (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = map g (map f p) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp only [← image_comp, map_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp, comp_apply]
@[gcongr]
theorem map_mono {f : F} {p p' : Submodule R M} : p ≤ p' → map f p ≤ map f p' :=
image_subset _
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : map (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = ⊥ :=
have : ∃ x : M, x ∈ p := ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩
ext <| by simp [this, eq_comm]
theorem map_add_le (f g : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) : map (f + g) p ≤ map f p ⊔ map g p := by
rintro x ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact add_mem_sup (mem_map_of_mem hm) (mem_map_of_mem hm)
theorem map_inf_le (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} :
(p ⊓ q).map f ≤ p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
image_inter_subset f p q
theorem map_inf (f : F) {p q : Submodule R M} (hf : Injective f) :
(p ⊓ q).map f = p.map f ⊓ q.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
lemma map_iInf {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {p : ι → Submodule R M} (f : F) (hf : Injective f) :
(⨅ i, p i).map f = ⨅ i, (p i).map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simpa only [map_coe, iInf_coe] using hf.injOn.image_iInter_eq
theorem range_map_nonempty (N : Submodule R M) :
(Set.range (fun ϕ => Submodule.map ϕ N : (M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) → Submodule R₂ M₂)).Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.mem_range.mpr ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
end
section SemilinearMap
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ₁₂ σ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair σ₂₁ σ₁₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The pushforward of a submodule by an injective linear map is
linearly equivalent to the original submodule. See also `LinearEquiv.submoduleMap` for a
computable version when `f` has an explicit inverse. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) :
p ≃ₛₗ[σ₁₂] p.map f :=
{ Equiv.Set.image f p i with
map_add' := by
intros
simp only [coe_add, map_add, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl
map_smul' := by
intros
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simp only [coe_smul_of_tower, map_smulₛₗ _, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.Set.image_apply]
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M) (x : p) :
(equivMapOfInjective f i p x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_equivMapOfInjective_symm_apply (f : F) (i : Injective f) (p : Submodule R M)
(x : p.map f) : f ((equivMapOfInjective f i p).symm x) = x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply (equivMapOfInjective f i p) x, coe_equivMapOfInjective_apply,
i.eq_iff, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The pullback of a submodule `p ⊆ M₂` along `f : M → M₂` -/
def comap [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : Submodule R M :=
{ p.toAddSubmonoid.comap f with
carrier := f ⁻¹' p
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 added `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul_mem' := fun a x h => by simp [p.smul_mem (σ₁₂ a) h, map_smulₛₗ _] }
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (comap f p : Set M) = f ⁻¹' p :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comap_coe_toLinearMap (f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
comap (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) p = comap f p := rfl
@[simp]
theorem AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_comap {A A₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup A] [AddCommGroup A₂]
(f : A →+ A₂) (s : AddSubgroup A₂) :
(AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule s).comap f.toIntLinearMap =
AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule (s.comap f) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} : x ∈ comap f p ↔ f x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : comap (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) p = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem comap_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (p : Submodule R₃ M₃) :
comap (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) p = comap f (comap g p) :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem comap_mono {f : F} {q q' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : q ≤ q' → comap f q ≤ comap f q' :=
preimage_mono
theorem le_comap_pow_of_le_comap (p : Submodule R M) {f : M →ₗ[R] M}
(h : p ≤ p.comap f) (k : ℕ) : p ≤ p.comap (f ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [Module.End.one_eq_id]
| succ k ih => simp [Module.End.iterate_succ, comap_comp, h.trans (comap_mono ih)]
section
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
map f p ≤ q ↔ p ≤ comap f q :=
image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)
| _, _ => map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : F) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem map_sup (f : F) : map f (p ⊔ p') = map f p ⊔ map f p' :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
map f (⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, map f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
end
@[simp]
theorem comap_top (f : F) : comap f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf (f : F) : comap f (q ⊓ q') = comap f q ⊓ comap f q' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_iInf [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {ι : Sort*} (f : F) (p : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
comap f (⨅ i, p i) = ⨅ i, comap f (p i) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
@[simp]
theorem comap_zero : comap (0 : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) q = ⊤ :=
ext <| by simp
theorem map_comap_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) ≤ q :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
theorem le_comap_map [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (p : Submodule R M) : p ≤ comap f (map f p) :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
section submoduleOf
/-- For any `R` submodules `p` and `q`, `p ⊓ q` as a submodule of `q`. -/
def submoduleOf (p q : Submodule R M) : Submodule R q :=
Submodule.comap q.subtype p
/-- If `p ≤ q`, then `p` as a subgroup of `q` is isomorphic to `p`. -/
def submoduleOfEquivOfLe {p q : Submodule R M} (h : p ≤ q) : p.submoduleOf q ≃ₗ[R] p where
toFun m := ⟨m.1, m.2⟩
invFun m := ⟨⟨m.1, h m.2⟩, m.2⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end submoduleOf
section GaloisInsertion
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F}
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisInsertion` when `f` is surjective. -/
def giMapComap (hf : Surjective f) : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisInsertion fun S x hx => by
rcases hf x with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_comap]
exact ⟨y, hx, rfl⟩
variable (hf : Surjective f)
include hf
theorem map_comap_eq_of_surjective (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
(giMapComap hf).l_u_eq _
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Function.Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Function.Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊔ q.comap f).map f = p ⊔ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_sujective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨆ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iSup S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (p q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(p.comap f ⊓ q.comap f).map f = p ⊓ q :=
(giMapComap hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(⨅ i, (S i).comap f).map f = iInf S :=
(giMapComap hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective {p q : Submodule R₂ M₂} : p.comap f ≤ q.comap f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(giMapComap hf).u_le_u_iff
lemma comap_lt_comap_iff_of_surjective {p q : Submodule R₂ M₂} : p.comap f < q.comap f ↔ p < q := by
apply lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' <;> exact comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective hf
theorem comap_strictMono_of_surjective : StrictMono (comap f) :=
(giMapComap hf).strictMono_u
variable {p q}
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective (h : q.comap f ≤ p) : q ≤ p.map f :=
map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf q ▸ map_mono h
theorem lt_map_of_comap_lt_of_surjective (h : q.comap f < p) : q < p.map f := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le] at h ⊢; rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
exact h.imp_left (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective hf)
end GaloisInsertion
section GaloisCoinsertion
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F}
/-- `map f` and `comap f` form a `GaloisCoinsertion` when `f` is injective. -/
def gciMapComap (hf : Injective f) : GaloisCoinsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
(gc_map_comap f).toGaloisCoinsertion fun S x => by
simp only [mem_comap, mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro y hy hxy
rw [hf.eq_iff] at hxy
rwa [← hxy]
variable (hf : Injective f)
include hf
theorem comap_map_eq_of_injective (p : Submodule R M) : (p.map f).comap f = p :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_l_eq _
theorem comap_surjective_of_injective : Function.Surjective (comap f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_surjective
theorem map_injective_of_injective : Function.Injective (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_injective
theorem comap_inf_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊓ q.map f).comap f = p ⊓ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_inf_l _ _
theorem comap_iInf_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨅ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iInf S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iInf_l _
theorem comap_sup_map_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : (p.map f ⊔ q.map f).comap f = p ⊔ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_sup_l _ _
theorem comap_iSup_map_of_injective {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Submodule R M) :
(⨆ i, (S i).map f).comap f = iSup S :=
(gciMapComap hf).u_iSup_l _
theorem map_le_map_iff_of_injective (p q : Submodule R M) : p.map f ≤ q.map f ↔ p ≤ q :=
(gciMapComap hf).l_le_l_iff
theorem map_strictMono_of_injective : StrictMono (map f) :=
(gciMapComap hf).strictMono_l
lemma map_lt_map_iff_of_injective {p q : Submodule R M} :
p.map f < q.map f ↔ p < q := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, map_le_map_iff_of_injective hf,
(map_injective_of_injective hf).ne_iff]
lemma comap_lt_of_lt_map_of_injective {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : q < p.map f) : q.comap f < p := by
rw [← map_lt_map_iff_of_injective hf]
exact (map_comap_le _ _).trans_lt h
lemma map_covBy_of_injective {p q : Submodule R M} (h : p ⋖ q) :
p.map f ⋖ q.map f := by
refine ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne (map_mono h.1.le) ((map_injective_of_injective hf).ne h.1.ne), ?_⟩
intro P h₁ h₂
refine h.2 ?_ (Submodule.comap_lt_of_lt_map_of_injective hf h₂)
rw [← Submodule.map_lt_map_iff_of_injective hf]
refine h₁.trans_le ?_
exact (Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset (.trans h₂.le (Set.image_subset_range _ _))).superset
end GaloisCoinsertion
end SemilinearMap
section OrderIso
variable [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {F : Type*}
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps symm_apply apply]
def orderIsoMapComapOfBijective [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
(f : F) (hf : Bijective f) : Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ where
toFun := map f
invFun := comap f
left_inv := comap_map_eq_of_injective hf.injective
right_inv := map_comap_eq_of_surjective hf.surjective
map_rel_iff' := map_le_map_iff_of_injective hf.injective _ _
/-- A linear isomorphism induces an order isomorphism of submodules. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoMapComap [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] (f : F) :
Submodule R M ≃o Submodule R₂ M₂ := orderIsoMapComapOfBijective f (EquivLike.bijective f)
@[simp]
lemma orderIsoMapComap_symm_apply [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
(f : F) (p : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
(orderIsoMapComap f).symm p = comap f p :=
rfl
variable [EquivLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂] {e : F}
variable {p}
@[simp] protected lemma map_eq_bot_iff : p.map e = ⊥ ↔ p = ⊥ := map_eq_bot_iff (orderIsoMapComap e)
@[simp] protected lemma map_eq_top_iff : p.map e = ⊤ ↔ p = ⊤ := map_eq_top_iff (orderIsoMapComap e)
protected lemma map_ne_bot_iff : p.map e ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ ⊥ := by simp
protected lemma map_ne_top_iff : p.map e ≠ ⊤ ↔ p ≠ ⊤ := by simp
end OrderIso
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
--TODO(Mario): is there a way to prove this from order properties?
theorem map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M}
{p' : Submodule R₂ M₂} : map f p ⊓ p' = map f (p ⊓ comap f p') :=
le_antisymm (by rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h₁, rfl⟩, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩)
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 inf_le_right))
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_subtype : map p.subtype (comap p.subtype p') = p ⊓ p' :=
ext fun x => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩; exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩, h₂, rfl⟩⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_bot_submodule : ∀ b : (⊥ : Submodule R M), b = 0
| ⟨b', hb⟩ => Subtype.eq <| show b' = 0 from (mem_bot R).1 hb
/-- The infimum of a family of invariant submodule of an endomorphism is also an invariant
submodule. -/
theorem _root_.LinearMap.iInf_invariant {σ : R →+* R} [RingHomSurjective σ] {ι : Sort*}
(f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M) {p : ι → Submodule R M} (hf : ∀ i, ∀ v ∈ p i, f v ∈ p i) :
∀ v ∈ iInf p, f v ∈ iInf p := by
have : ∀ i, (p i).map f ≤ p i := by
rintro i - ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact hf i v hv
suffices (iInf p).map f ≤ iInf p by exact fun v hv => this ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact le_iInf fun i => (Submodule.map_mono (iInf_le p i)).trans (this i)
theorem disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot {p q : Submodule R M} : Disjoint p q ↔ comap p.subtype q = ⊥ := by
rw [← (map_injective_of_injective (show Injective p.subtype from Subtype.coe_injective)).eq_iff,
map_comap_subtype, map_bot, disjoint_iff]
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (p : Submodule R M)
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : map (-f) p = map f p :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨-x, show -x ∈ p from neg_mem hx, map_neg f x⟩, fun ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨-x, show -x ∈ p from neg_mem hx, (map_neg (-f) _).trans (neg_neg (f x))⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma comap_neg {f : M →ₗ[R] M₂} {p : Submodule R M₂} :
p.comap (-f) = p.comap f := by
ext; simp
lemma map_toAddSubgroup (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (p : Submodule R M) :
(p.map f).toAddSubgroup = p.toAddSubgroup.map (f : M →+ M₂) :=
rfl
end AddCommGroup
end Submodule
namespace Submodule
variable {K : Type*} {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
variable [Semifield K]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
theorem comap_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.comap (a • f) = p.comap f := by
ext b; simp only [Submodule.mem_comap, p.smul_mem_iff h, LinearMap.smul_apply]
protected theorem map_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) :
p.map (a • f) = p.map f :=
le_antisymm (by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap])
(by rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, ← comap_smul f _ a h, ← map_le_iff_le_comap])
theorem comap_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V₂) (a : K) :
p.comap (a • f) = ⨅ _ : a ≠ 0, p.comap f := by
classical by_cases h : a = 0 <;> simp [h, comap_smul]
theorem map_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V) (a : K) :
p.map (a • f) = ⨆ _ : a ≠ 0, map f p := by
classical by_cases h : a = 0 <;> simp [h, Submodule.map_smul]
end Submodule
namespace Submodule
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- If `s ≤ t`, then we can view `s` as a submodule of `t` by taking the comap
of `t.subtype`. -/
@[simps apply_coe symm_apply]
def comapSubtypeEquivOfLe {p q : Submodule R M} (hpq : p ≤ q) : comap q.subtype p ≃ₗ[R] p where
toFun x := ⟨x, x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x, hpq x.2⟩, x.2⟩
left_inv x := by simp only [coe_mk, SetLike.eta, LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
right_inv x := by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, SetLike.eta, LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end Module
end Submodule
namespace Submodule
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R}
variable [RingHomInvPair τ₁₂ τ₂₁] [RingHomInvPair τ₂₁ τ₁₂]
variable (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂)
@[simp high]
theorem mem_map_equiv {e : M ≃ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} {x : M₂} :
x ∈ p.map (e : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) ↔ e.symm x ∈ p := by
rw [Submodule.mem_map]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
simp [← hx, hy]
· intro hx
exact ⟨e.symm x, hx, by simp⟩
theorem map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (e : M ≃ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (K : Submodule R M) :
K.map (e : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) = K.comap (e.symm : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) :=
| Submodule.ext fun _ => by rw [mem_map_equiv, mem_comap, LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
theorem comap_equiv_eq_map_symm (e : M ≃ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (K : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
K.comap (e : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) = K.map (e.symm : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) :=
(map_equiv_eq_comap_symm e.symm K).symm
variable {p}
theorem map_symm_eq_iff (e : M ≃ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) {K : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Map.lean | 564 | 572 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Basic
/-!
# p-adic norm
This file defines the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ`.
The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` is the difference of the multiplicities of `p` in the numerator and
denominator of `q`. This function obeys the standard properties of a valuation, with the appropriate
assumptions on `p`.
The valuation induces a norm on `ℚ`. This norm is a nonarchimedean absolute value.
It takes values in {0} ∪ {1/p^k | k ∈ ℤ}.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation
-/
/-- If `q ≠ 0`, the `p`-adic norm of a rational `q` is `p ^ (-padicValRat p q)`.
If `q = 0`, the `p`-adic norm of `q` is `0`. -/
def padicNorm (p : ℕ) (q : ℚ) : ℚ :=
if q = 0 then 0 else (p : ℚ) ^ (-padicValRat p q)
namespace padicNorm
open padicValRat
variable {p : ℕ}
/-- Unfolds the definition of the `p`-adic norm of `q` when `q ≠ 0`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem eq_zpow_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) :
padicNorm p q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-padicValRat p q) := by simp [hq, padicNorm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm is nonnegative. -/
protected theorem nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ padicNorm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq, padicNorm]
else by
unfold padicNorm
split_ifs
apply zpow_nonneg
exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `0` is `0`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicNorm p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicNorm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `1` is `1`. -/
protected theorem one : padicNorm p 1 = 1 := by simp [padicNorm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is `p⁻¹` if `p > 1`.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p_of_prime` for a version assuming `p` is prime. -/
theorem padicNorm_p (hp : 1 < p) : padicNorm p p = (p : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
simp [padicNorm, (pos_of_gt hp).ne', padicValNat.self hp]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is `p⁻¹` if `p` is prime.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p` for a version assuming `1 < p`. -/
@[simp]
theorem padicNorm_p_of_prime [Fact p.Prime] : padicNorm p p = (p : ℚ)⁻¹ :=
padicNorm_p <| Nat.Prime.one_lt Fact.out
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `q` is `1` if `q` is prime and not equal to `p`. -/
theorem padicNorm_of_prime_of_ne {q : ℕ} [p_prime : Fact p.Prime] [q_prime : Fact q.Prime]
(neq : p ≠ q) : padicNorm p q = 1 := by
have p : padicValRat p q = 0 := mod_cast padicValNat_primes neq
rw [padicNorm, p]
simp [q_prime.1.ne_zero]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is less than `1` if `1 < p`.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p_lt_one_of_prime` for a version assuming `p` is prime. -/
theorem padicNorm_p_lt_one (hp : 1 < p) : padicNorm p p < 1 := by
rw [padicNorm_p hp, inv_lt_one_iff₀]
exact mod_cast Or.inr hp
/-- The `p`-adic norm of `p` is less than `1` if `p` is prime.
See also `padicNorm.padicNorm_p_lt_one` for a version assuming `1 < p`. -/
theorem padicNorm_p_lt_one_of_prime [Fact p.Prime] : padicNorm p p < 1 :=
padicNorm_p_lt_one <| Nat.Prime.one_lt Fact.out
/-- `padicNorm p q` takes discrete values `p ^ -z` for `z : ℤ`. -/
protected theorem values_discrete {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, padicNorm p q = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) :=
⟨padicValRat p q, by simp [padicNorm, hq]⟩
/-- `padicNorm p` is symmetric. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem neg (q : ℚ) : padicNorm p (-q) = padicNorm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq] else by simp [padicNorm, hq]
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- If `q ≠ 0`, then `padicNorm p q ≠ 0`. -/
protected theorem nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : padicNorm p q ≠ 0 := by
rw [padicNorm.eq_zpow_of_nonzero hq]
apply zpow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast ne_of_gt hp.1.pos
/-- If the `p`-adic norm of `q` is 0, then `q` is `0`. -/
theorem zero_of_padicNorm_eq_zero {q : ℚ} (h : padicNorm p q = 0) : q = 0 := by
apply by_contradiction; intro hq
unfold padicNorm at h; rw [if_neg hq] at h
apply absurd h
apply zpow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero
/-- The `p`-adic norm is multiplicative. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem mul (q r : ℚ) : padicNorm p (q * r) = padicNorm p q * padicNorm p r :=
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq]
else
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr]
else by
have : (p : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by simp [hp.1.ne_zero]
simp [padicNorm, *, padicValRat.mul, zpow_add₀ this, mul_comm]
/-- The `p`-adic norm respects division. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem div (q r : ℚ) : padicNorm p (q / r) = padicNorm p q / padicNorm p r :=
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr]
else eq_div_of_mul_eq (padicNorm.nonzero hr) (by rw [← padicNorm.mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hr])
/-- The `p`-adic norm of an integer is at most `1`. -/
protected theorem of_int (z : ℤ) : padicNorm p z ≤ 1 := by
obtain rfl | hz := eq_or_ne z 0
· simp
· rw [padicNorm, if_neg (mod_cast hz)]
exact zpow_le_one_of_nonpos₀ (mod_cast hp.1.one_le) (by simp)
private theorem nonarchimedean_aux {q r : ℚ} (h : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p r) :
padicNorm p (q + r) ≤ max (padicNorm p q) (padicNorm p r) :=
have hnqp : padicNorm p q ≥ 0 := padicNorm.nonneg _
have hnrp : padicNorm p r ≥ 0 := padicNorm.nonneg _
if hq : q = 0 then by simp [hq, max_eq_right hnrp, le_max_right]
else
if hr : r = 0 then by simp [hr, max_eq_left hnqp, le_max_left]
else
if hqr : q + r = 0 then le_trans (by simpa [hqr] using hnqp) (le_max_left _ _)
else by
unfold padicNorm; split_ifs
apply le_max_iff.2
left
apply zpow_le_zpow_right₀
· exact mod_cast le_of_lt hp.1.one_lt
· apply neg_le_neg
have : padicValRat p q = min (padicValRat p q) (padicValRat p r) := (min_eq_left h).symm
rw [this]
exact min_le_padicValRat_add hqr
/-- The `p`-adic norm is nonarchimedean: the norm of `p + q` is at most the max of the norm of `p`
and the norm of `q`. -/
protected theorem nonarchimedean {q r : ℚ} :
padicNorm p (q + r) ≤ max (padicNorm p q) (padicNorm p r) := by
wlog hle : padicValRat p q ≤ padicValRat p r generalizing q r
· rw [add_comm, max_comm]
exact this (le_of_not_le hle)
exact nonarchimedean_aux hle
/-- The `p`-adic norm respects the triangle inequality: the norm of `p + q` is at most the norm of
`p` plus the norm of `q`. -/
theorem triangle_ineq (q r : ℚ) : padicNorm p (q + r) ≤ padicNorm p q + padicNorm p r :=
calc
padicNorm p (q + r) ≤ max (padicNorm p q) (padicNorm p r) := padicNorm.nonarchimedean
_ ≤ padicNorm p q + padicNorm p r :=
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padicNorm.nonneg _) (padicNorm.nonneg _)
/-- The `p`-adic norm of a difference is at most the max of each component. Restates the archimedean
property of the `p`-adic norm. -/
protected theorem sub {q r : ℚ} : padicNorm p (q - r) ≤ max (padicNorm p q) (padicNorm p r) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← padicNorm.neg r]
exact padicNorm.nonarchimedean
/-- If the `p`-adic norms of `q` and `r` are different, then the norm of `q + r` is equal to the max
of the norms of `q` and `r`. -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℚ} (hne : padicNorm p q ≠ padicNorm p r) :
padicNorm p (q + r) = max (padicNorm p q) (padicNorm p r) := by
wlog hlt : padicNorm p r < padicNorm p q
· rw [add_comm, max_comm]
exact this hne.symm (hne.lt_or_lt.resolve_right hlt)
have : padicNorm p q ≤ max (padicNorm p (q + r)) (padicNorm p r) :=
calc
padicNorm p q = padicNorm p (q + r + (-r)) := by ring_nf
_ ≤ max (padicNorm p (q + r)) (padicNorm p (-r)) := padicNorm.nonarchimedean
_ = max (padicNorm p (q + r)) (padicNorm p r) := by simp
have hnge : padicNorm p r ≤ padicNorm p (q + r) := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro hgt
rw [max_eq_right_of_lt hgt] at this
exact not_lt_of_ge this hlt
have : padicNorm p q ≤ padicNorm p (q + r) := by rwa [max_eq_left hnge] at this
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
· rwa [max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
/-- The `p`-adic norm is an absolute value: positive-definite and multiplicative, satisfying the
triangle inequality. -/
instance : IsAbsoluteValue (padicNorm p) where
abv_nonneg' := padicNorm.nonneg
abv_eq_zero' := ⟨zero_of_padicNorm_eq_zero, fun hx ↦ by simp [hx]⟩
abv_add' := padicNorm.triangle_ineq
abv_mul' := padicNorm.mul
theorem dvd_iff_norm_le {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ} : ↑(p ^ n) ∣ z ↔ padicNorm p z ≤ (p : ℚ) ^ (-n : ℤ) := by
unfold padicNorm; split_ifs with hz
· norm_cast at hz
simp [hz]
· rw [zpow_le_zpow_iff_right₀, neg_le_neg_iff, padicValRat.of_int,
padicValInt.of_ne_one_ne_zero hp.1.ne_one _]
· norm_cast
rw [← FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity]
· norm_cast
· apply Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.out.ne_one], mod_cast hz⟩
· exact_mod_cast hz
· exact_mod_cast hp.out.one_lt
/-- The `p`-adic norm of an integer `m` is one iff `p` doesn't divide `m`. -/
theorem int_eq_one_iff (m : ℤ) : padicNorm p m = 1 ↔ ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ m := by
nth_rw 2 [← pow_one p]
simp only [dvd_iff_norm_le, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_one, zpow_neg, zpow_one, not_le]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h, inv_lt_one₀] <;> norm_cast
· exact Nat.Prime.one_lt Fact.out
· exact Nat.Prime.pos Fact.out
· simp only [padicNorm]
split_ifs
· rw [inv_lt_zero, ← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
intro h
exact (Nat.not_lt_zero p h).elim
· have : 1 < (p : ℚ) := by norm_cast; exact Nat.Prime.one_lt (Fact.out : Nat.Prime p)
rw [← zpow_neg_one, zpow_lt_zpow_iff_right₀ this]
have : 0 ≤ padicValRat p m := by simp only [of_int, Nat.cast_nonneg]
intro h
rw [← zpow_zero (p : ℚ), zpow_right_inj₀] <;> linarith
theorem int_lt_one_iff (m : ℤ) : padicNorm p m < 1 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ m := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← int_eq_one_iff, eq_iff_le_not_lt]
simp only [padicNorm.of_int, true_and]
theorem of_nat (m : ℕ) : padicNorm p m ≤ 1 :=
padicNorm.of_int (m : ℤ)
/-- The `p`-adic norm of a natural `m` is one iff `p` doesn't divide `m`. -/
theorem nat_eq_one_iff (m : ℕ) : padicNorm p m = 1 ↔ ¬p ∣ m := by
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← int_eq_one_iff, Int.cast_natCast]
theorem nat_lt_one_iff (m : ℕ) : padicNorm p m < 1 ↔ p ∣ m := by
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← int_lt_one_iff, Int.cast_natCast]
/-- If a rational is not a p-adic integer, it is not an integer. -/
theorem not_int_of_not_padic_int (p : ℕ) {a : ℚ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)]
(H : 1 < padicNorm p a) : ¬ a.isInt := by
contrapose! H
rw [Rat.eq_num_of_isInt H]
apply padicNorm.of_int
theorem sum_lt {α : Type*} {F : α → ℚ} {t : ℚ} {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty → (∀ i ∈ s, padicNorm p (F i) < t) → padicNorm p (∑ i ∈ s, F i) < t := by
classical
refine s.induction_on (by rintro ⟨-, ⟨⟩⟩) ?_
rintro a S haS IH - ht
by_cases hs : S.Nonempty
· rw [Finset.sum_insert haS]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt padicNorm.nonarchimedean
(max_lt (ht a (Finset.mem_insert_self a S))
(IH hs fun b hb ↦ ht b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb)))
· simp_all
theorem sum_le {α : Type*} {F : α → ℚ} {t : ℚ} {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty → (∀ i ∈ s, padicNorm p (F i) ≤ t) → padicNorm p (∑ i ∈ s, F i) ≤ t := by
classical
refine s.induction_on (by rintro ⟨-, ⟨⟩⟩) ?_
rintro a S haS IH - ht
by_cases hs : S.Nonempty
· rw [Finset.sum_insert haS]
exact
padicNorm.nonarchimedean.trans
(max_le (ht a (Finset.mem_insert_self a S))
(IH hs fun b hb ↦ ht b (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hb)))
· simp_all
|
theorem sum_lt' {α : Type*} {F : α → ℚ} {t : ℚ} {s : Finset α}
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNorm.lean | 302 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 3,623 | 3,630 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Notation
/-!
# Maps between matroids
This file defines maps and comaps, which move a matroid on one type to a matroid on another
using a function between the types. The constructions are (up to isomorphism)
just combinations of restrictions and parallel extensions, so are not mathematically difficult.
Because a matroid `M : Matroid α` is defined with am embedded ground set `M.E : Set α`
which contains all the structure of `M`, there are several types of map and comap
one could reasonably ask for;
for instance, we could map `M : Matroid α` to a `Matroid β` using either
a function `f : α → β`, a function `f : ↑M.E → β` or indeed a function `f : ↑M.E → ↑E`
for some `E : Set β`. We attempt to give definitions that capture most reasonable use cases.
`Matroid.map` and `Matroid.comap` are defined in terms of bare functions rather than
functions defined on subtypes, so are often easier to work in practice than the subtype variants.
In fact, the statement that `N = Matroid.map M f _` for some `f : α → β`
is equivalent to the existence of an isomorphism from `M` to `N`,
except in the trivial degenerate case where `M` is an empty matroid on a nonempty type and `N`
is an empty matroid on an empty type.
This can be simpler to use than an actual formal isomorphism, which requires subtypes.
## Main definitions
In the definitions below, `M` and `N` are matroids on `α` and `β` respectively.
* For `f : α → β`, `Matroid.comap N f` is the matroid on `α` with ground set `f ⁻¹' N.E`
in which each `I` is independent if and only if `f` is injective on `I` and
`f '' I` is independent in `N`.
(For each nonloop `x` of `N`, the set `f ⁻¹' {x}` is a parallel class of `N.comap f`)
* `Matroid.comapOn N f E` is the restriction of `N.comap f` to `E` for some `E : Set α`.
* For an embedding `f : M.E ↪ β` defined on the subtype `↑M.E`,
`Matroid.mapSetEmbedding M f` is the matroid on `β` with ground set `range f`
whose independent sets are the images of those in `M`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M`.
* For a function `f : α → β` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on `M.E`,
`Matroid.map f hf` is the matroid on `β` with ground set `f '' M.E`
whose independent sets are the images of those in `M`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M`,
and does not depend on the values `f` takes outside `M.E`.
* `Matroid.mapEmbedding f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : α ↪ β` is a bundled embedding.
It is defined separately because the global injectivity of `f` gives some nicer `simp` lemmas.
* `Matroid.mapEquiv f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : α ≃ β` is a bundled equivalence.
It is defined separately because we get even nicer `simp` lemmas.
* `Matroid.mapSetEquiv f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : M.E ≃ E` is an equivalence on
subtypes. It gives a matroid on `β` with ground set `E`.
* For `X : Set α`, `Matroid.restrictSubtype M X` is the `Matroid ↥X` with ground set
`univ : Set ↥X`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M ↾ X`.
## Implementation details
The definition of `comap` is the only place where we need to actually define a matroid from scratch.
After `comap` is defined, we can define `map` and its variants indirectly in terms of `comap`.
If `f : α → β` is injective on `M.E`, the independent sets of `M.map f hf` are the images of
the independent set of `M`; i.e. `(M.map f hf).Indep I ↔ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀`.
But if `f` is globally injective, we can phrase this more directly;
indeed, `(M.map f _).Indep I ↔ M.Indep (f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f`.
If `f` is an equivalence we have `(M.map f _).Indep I ↔ M.Indep (f.symm '' I)`.
In order that these stronger statements can be `@[simp]`,
we define `mapEmbedding` and `mapEquiv` separately from `map`.
## Notes
For finite matroids, both maps and comaps are a special case of a construction of
Perfect [perfect1969matroid] in which a matroid structure can be transported across an arbitrary
bipartite graph that may not correspond to a function at all (See [oxley2011], Theorem 11.2.12).
It would have been nice to use this more general construction as a basis for the definition
of both `Matroid.map` and `Matroid.comap`.
Unfortunately, we can't do this, because the construction doesn't extend to infinite matroids.
Specifically, if `M₁` and `M₂` are matroids on the same type `α`,
and `f` is the natural function from `α ⊕ α` to `α`,
then the images under `f` of the independent sets of the direct sum `M₁ ⊕ M₂` are
the independent sets of a matroid if and only if the union of `M₁` and `M₂` is a matroid,
and unions do not exist for some pairs of infinite matroids: see [aignerhorev2012infinite].
For this reason, `Matroid.map` requires injectivity to be well-defined in general.
## TODO
* Bundled matroid isomorphisms.
* Maps of finite matroids across bipartite graphs.
## References
* [E. Aigner-Horev, J. Carmesin, J. Fröhlic, Infinite Matroid Union][aignerhorev2012infinite]
* [H. Perfect, Independence Spaces and Combinatorial Problems][perfect1969matroid]
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set Function Set.Notation
namespace Matroid
variable {α β : Type*} {f : α → β} {E I : Set α} {M : Matroid α} {N : Matroid β}
section comap
/-- The pullback of a matroid on `β` by a function `f : α → β` to a matroid on `α`.
Elements with the same (nonloop) image are parallel and the ground set is `f ⁻¹' M.E`.
The matroids `M.comap f` and `M ↾ range f` have isomorphic simplifications;
the preimage of each nonloop of `M ↾ range f` is a parallel class. -/
def comap (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : Matroid α :=
IndepMatroid.matroid <|
{ E := f ⁻¹' N.E
Indep := fun I ↦ N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I
indep_empty := by simp
indep_subset := fun _ _ h hIJ ↦ ⟨h.1.subset (image_subset _ hIJ), InjOn.mono hIJ h.2⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I B ⟨hI, hIinj⟩ hImax hBmax
obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hI'inj⟩ := (not_maximal_subset_iff ⟨hI, hIinj⟩).1 hImax
have h₁ : ¬(N ↾ range f).IsBase (f '' I) := by
refine fun hB ↦ hII'.ne ?_
have h_im := hB.eq_of_subset_indep (by simpa) (image_subset _ hII'.subset)
rwa [hI'inj.image_eq_image_iff hII'.subset Subset.rfl] at h_im
have h₂ : (N ↾ range f).IsBase (f '' B) := by
refine Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (by simpa using hBmax.1.1) ?_
rintro _ ⟨⟨e, heB, rfl⟩, hfe⟩ hi
rw [restrict_indep_iff, ← image_insert_eq] at hi
have hinj : InjOn f (insert e B) := by
rw [injOn_insert (fun heB ↦ hfe (mem_image_of_mem f heB))]
exact ⟨hBmax.1.2, hfe⟩
refine hBmax.not_prop_of_ssuperset (t := insert e B) (ssubset_insert ?_) ⟨hi.1, hinj⟩
exact fun heB ↦ hfe <| mem_image_of_mem f heB
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟨e, he, rfl⟩, he'⟩, hei⟩ := Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (by simpa) h₁ h₂
have heI : e ∉ I := fun heI ↦ he' (mem_image_of_mem f heI)
rw [← image_insert_eq, restrict_indep_iff] at hei
exact ⟨e, ⟨he, heI⟩, hei.1, (injOn_insert heI).2 ⟨hIinj, he'⟩⟩
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I ⟨hI, hIinj⟩ hIX
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ := (N ↾ range f).existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (f '' X) (by simp)
(f '' I) (by simpa) (image_subset _ hIX)
simp only [restrict_indep_iff, image_subset_iff, maximal_subset_iff, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
and_assoc] at hJ ⊢
obtain ⟨hIJ, hJ, hJf, hJX, hJmax⟩ := hJ
obtain ⟨J₀, hIJ₀, hJ₀X, hbj⟩ := hIinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hIX
(image_subset f hIJ) (image_subset_iff.2 <| preimage_mono hJX)
obtain rfl : f '' J₀ = J := by rw [← image_preimage_eq_of_subset hJf, hbj.image_eq]
refine ⟨J₀, hIJ₀, hJ, hbj.injOn, hJ₀X, fun K hK hKinj hKX hJ₀K ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← hKinj.image_eq_image_iff hJ₀K Subset.rfl, hJmax hK (image_subset_range _ _)
(image_subset f hKX) (image_subset f hJ₀K)]
subset_ground := fun _ hI e heI ↦ hI.1.subset_ground ⟨e, heI, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma comap_indep_iff : (N.comap f).Indep I ↔ N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_ground_eq (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).E = f ⁻¹' N.E := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_dep_iff :
(N.comap f).Dep I ↔ N.Dep (f '' I) ∨ (N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ ¬ InjOn f I) := by
rw [Dep, comap_indep_iff, not_and, comap_ground_eq, Dep, image_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨hi, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [and_iff_left h, ← imp_iff_not_or]
exact fun hI ↦ ⟨hI, hi hI⟩
rintro (⟨hI, hIE⟩ | hI)
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ (hI h).elim, hIE⟩
rw [iff_true_intro hI.1, iff_true_intro hI.2, implies_true, true_and]
simpa using hI.1.subset_ground
@[simp] lemma comap_id (N : Matroid β) : N.comap id = N :=
ext_indep rfl <| by simp [injective_id.injOn]
lemma comap_indep_iff_of_injOn (hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' N.E)) :
(N.comap f).Indep I ↔ N.Indep (f '' I) := by
rw [comap_indep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
refine fun hi ↦ hf.mono <| subset_trans ?_ (preimage_mono hi.subset_ground)
apply subset_preimage_image
@[simp] lemma comap_emptyOn (f : α → β) : comap (emptyOn β) f = emptyOn α := by
simp [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma comap_loopyOn (f : α → β) (E : Set β) : comap (loopyOn E) f = loopyOn (f ⁻¹' E) := by
rw [eq_loopyOn_iff]; aesop
@[simp] lemma comap_isBasis_iff {I X : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBasis I X ↔ N.IsBasis (f '' I) (f '' X) ∧ I.InjOn f ∧ I ⊆ X := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hI, hinj⟩ := comap_indep_iff.1 h.indep
refine ⟨hI.isBasis_of_forall_insert (image_subset f h.subset) fun e he ↦ ?_, hinj, h.subset⟩
simp only [mem_diff, mem_image, not_exists, not_and, and_imp, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂] at he
obtain ⟨⟨e, heX, rfl⟩, he⟩ := he
have heI : e ∉ I := fun heI ↦ (he e heI rfl)
replace h := h.insert_dep ⟨heX, heI⟩
simp only [comap_dep_iff, image_insert_eq, or_iff_not_imp_right, injOn_insert heI,
hinj, mem_image, not_exists, not_and, true_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp, not_not] at h
exact h (fun _ ↦ he)
refine Indep.isBasis_of_forall_insert ?_ h.2.2 fun e ⟨heX, heI⟩ ↦ ?_
· simp [comap_indep_iff, h.1.indep, h.2]
have hIE : insert e I ⊆ (N.comap f).E := by
simp_rw [comap_ground_eq, ← image_subset_iff]
exact (image_subset _ (insert_subset heX h.2.2)).trans h.1.subset_ground
suffices N.Indep (insert (f e) (f '' I)) → ∃ x ∈ I, f x = f e
by simpa [← not_indep_iff hIE, injOn_insert heI, h.2.1, image_insert_eq]
exact h.1.mem_of_insert_indep (mem_image_of_mem f heX)
@[simp] lemma comap_isBase_iff {B : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBasis (f '' B) (f '' (f ⁻¹' N.E)) ∧ B.InjOn f ∧ B ⊆ f ⁻¹' N.E := by
rw [← isBasis_ground_iff, comap_isBasis_iff]; rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_isBasis'_iff {I X : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBasis' I X ↔ N.IsBasis' (f '' I) (f '' X) ∧ I.InjOn f ∧ I ⊆ X := by
simp only [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground, comap_ground_eq, comap_isBasis_iff,
image_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← and_assoc, and_congr_left_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp,
and_imp]
exact fun h _ _ ↦ (image_subset_iff.1 h.indep.subset_ground)
instance comap_finitary (N : Matroid β) [N.Finitary] (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).Finitary := by
refine ⟨fun I hI ↦ ?_⟩
rw [comap_indep_iff, indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep]
simp only [forall_subset_image_iff]
refine ⟨fun J hJ hfin ↦ ?_,
fun x hx y hy ↦ (hI _ (pair_subset hx hy) (by simp)).2 (by simp) (by simp)⟩
obtain ⟨J', hJ'J, hJ'⟩ := (surjOn_image f J).exists_bijOn_subset
rw [← hJ'.image_eq] at hfin ⊢
exact (hI J' (hJ'J.trans hJ) (hfin.of_finite_image hJ'.injOn)).1
instance comap_rankFinite (N : Matroid β) [N.RankFinite] (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).RankFinite := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := (N.comap f).exists_isBase
refine hB.rankFinite_of_finite ?_
simp only [comap_isBase_iff] at hB
exact (hB.1.indep.finite.of_finite_image hB.2.1)
end comap
section comapOn
variable {E B I : Set α}
/-- The pullback of a matroid on `β` by a function `f : α → β` to a matroid on `α`,
restricted to a ground set `E`.
The matroids `M.comapOn f E` and `M ↾ (f '' E)` have isomorphic simplifications;
elements with the same nonloop image are parallel. -/
def comapOn (N : Matroid β) (E : Set α) (f : α → β) : Matroid α := (N.comap f) ↾ E
lemma comapOn_preimage_eq (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : N.comapOn (f ⁻¹' N.E) f = N.comap f := by
rw [comapOn, restrict_eq_self_iff]; rfl
@[simp] lemma comapOn_indep_iff :
(N.comapOn E f).Indep I ↔ (N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I ∧ I ⊆ E) := by
simp [comapOn, and_assoc]
@[simp] lemma comapOn_ground_eq : (N.comapOn E f).E = E := rfl
lemma comapOn_isBase_iff :
(N.comapOn E f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBasis' (f '' B) (f '' E) ∧ B.InjOn f ∧ B ⊆ E := by
rw [comapOn, isBase_restrict_iff', comap_isBasis'_iff]
lemma comapOn_isBase_iff_of_surjOn (h : SurjOn f E N.E) :
(N.comapOn E f).IsBase B ↔ (N.IsBase (f '' B) ∧ InjOn f B ∧ B ⊆ E) := by
simp_rw [comapOn_isBase_iff, and_congr_left_iff, and_imp, isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h, isBasis_ground_iff, implies_true]
lemma comapOn_isBase_iff_of_bijOn (h : BijOn f E N.E) :
(N.comapOn E f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBase (f '' B) ∧ B ⊆ E := by
rw [← and_iff_left_of_imp (IsBase.subset_ground (M := N.comapOn E f) (B := B)),
comapOn_ground_eq, and_congr_left_iff]
suffices h' : B ⊆ E → InjOn f B from fun hB ↦
by simp [hB, comapOn_isBase_iff_of_surjOn h.surjOn, h']
exact fun hBE ↦ h.injOn.mono hBE
lemma comapOn_dual_eq_of_bijOn (h : BijOn f E N.E) :
(N.comapOn E f)✶ = N✶.comapOn E f := by
refine ext_isBase (by simp) (fun B hB ↦ ?_)
rw [comapOn_isBase_iff_of_bijOn (by simpa), dual_isBase_iff, comapOn_isBase_iff_of_bijOn h,
dual_isBase_iff _, comapOn_ground_eq, and_iff_left diff_subset, and_iff_left (by simpa),
h.injOn.image_diff_subset (by simpa), h.image_eq]
exact (h.mapsTo.mono_left (show B ⊆ E by simpa)).image_subset
instance comapOn_finitary [N.Finitary] : (N.comapOn E f).Finitary := by
rw [comapOn]; infer_instance
instance comapOn_rankFinite [N.RankFinite] : (N.comapOn E f).RankFinite := by
rw [comapOn]; infer_instance
end comapOn
section mapSetEmbedding
/-- Map a matroid `M` to an isomorphic copy in `β` using an embedding `M.E ↪ β`. -/
def mapSetEmbedding (M : Matroid α) (f : M.E ↪ β) : Matroid β := Matroid.ofExistsMatroid
(E := range f)
(Indep := fun I ↦ M.Indep ↑(f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f)
(hM := by
classical
obtain (rfl | ⟨⟨e,he⟩⟩) := eq_emptyOn_or_nonempty M
· refine ⟨emptyOn β, ?_⟩
simp only [emptyOn_ground] at f
simp [range_eq_empty f, subset_empty_iff]
have _ : Nonempty M.E := ⟨⟨e,he⟩⟩
have _ : Nonempty α := ⟨e⟩
refine ⟨M.comapOn (range f) (fun x ↦ ↑(invFunOn f univ x)), rfl, ?_⟩
simp_rw [comapOn_indep_iff, ← and_assoc, and_congr_left_iff, subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq]
rintro _ ⟨I, rfl⟩
rw [← image_image, InjOn.invFunOn_image f.injective.injOn (subset_univ _),
preimage_image_eq _ f.injective, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro - x hx y hy
simp only [EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, Subtype.val_inj]
exact (invFunOn_injOn_image f univ) (image_subset f (subset_univ I) hx)
(image_subset f (subset_univ I) hy) )
@[simp] lemma mapSetEmbedding_ground (M : Matroid α) (f : M.E ↪ β) :
(M.mapSetEmbedding f).E = range f := rfl
@[simp] lemma mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff {f : M.E ↪ β} {I : Set β} :
(M.mapSetEmbedding f).Indep I ↔ M.Indep ↑(f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f := Iff.rfl
lemma Indep.exists_eq_image_of_mapSetEmbedding {f : M.E ↪ β} {I : Set β}
(hI : (M.mapSetEmbedding f).Indep I) : ∃ (I₀ : Set M.E), M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀ :=
⟨f ⁻¹' I, hI.1, Eq.symm <| image_preimage_eq_of_subset hI.2⟩
lemma mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff' {f : M.E ↪ β} {I : Set β} :
(M.mapSetEmbedding f).Indep I ↔ ∃ (I₀ : Set M.E), M.Indep ↑I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀ := by
simp only [mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff, subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hI, I, rfl⟩
exact ⟨I, by rwa [preimage_image_eq _ f.injective] at hI, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨I, hI, rfl⟩
rw [preimage_image_eq _ f.injective]
exact ⟨hI, _, rfl⟩
end mapSetEmbedding
section map
/-- Given a function `f` that is injective on `M.E`, the copy of `M` in `β` whose independent sets
are the images of those in `M`. If `β` is a nonempty type, then `N : Matroid β` is a map of `M`
if and only if `M` and `N` are isomorphic. -/
def map (M : Matroid α) (f : α → β) (hf : InjOn f M.E) : Matroid β := Matroid.ofExistsMatroid
(E := f '' M.E)
(Indep := fun I ↦ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀)
(hM := by
refine ⟨M.mapSetEmbedding ⟨_, hf.injective⟩, by simp, fun I ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff', Embedding.coeFn_mk, restrict_apply,
← image_image f Subtype.val, Subtype.exists_set_subtype (p := fun J ↦ M.Indep J ∧ I = f '' J)]
exact ⟨fun ⟨I₀, _, hI₀⟩ ↦ ⟨I₀, hI₀⟩, fun ⟨I₀, hI₀⟩ ↦ ⟨I₀, hI₀.1.subset_ground, hI₀⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma map_ground (M : Matroid α) (f : α → β) (hf) : (M.map f hf).E = f '' M.E := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_indep_iff {hf} {I : Set β} :
(M.map f hf).Indep I ↔ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀ := Iff.rfl
lemma Indep.map (hI : M.Indep I) (f : α → β) (hf) : (M.map f hf).Indep (f '' I) :=
map_indep_iff.2 ⟨I, hI, rfl⟩
lemma Indep.exists_bijOn_of_map {I : Set β} (hf) (hI : (M.map f hf).Indep I) :
∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ BijOn f I₀ I := by
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀, rfl⟩ := hI
exact ⟨I₀, hI₀, (hf.mono hI₀.subset_ground).bijOn_image⟩
| lemma map_image_indep_iff {hf} {I : Set α} (hI : I ⊆ M.E) :
(M.map f hf).Indep (f '' I) ↔ M.Indep I := by
rw [map_indep_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨I, h, rfl⟩⟩
rw [hf.image_eq_image_iff hI hJ.subset_ground] at hIJ; rwa [hIJ]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Map.lean | 368 | 372 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.