Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
/-!
# Variables of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the variable sets of a multivariate polynomial.
The *variable set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Finset` containing each $x \in X$
that appears in a monomial in $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.vars p` : the finset of variables occurring in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `vars p = {x, y, z}`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Vars
/-! ### `vars` -/
/-- `vars p` is the set of variables appearing in the polynomial `p` -/
def vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.toFinset
theorem vars_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.vars = p.degrees.toFinset := by
rw [vars]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem vars_0 : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vars_monomial (h : r ≠ 0) : (monomial s r).vars = s.support := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ h, Finsupp.toFinset_toMultiset]
@[simp]
theorem vars_C : (C r : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vars_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = {n} := by
rw [X, vars_monomial (one_ne_zero' R), Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℕ)]
theorem mem_vars (i : σ) : i ∈ p.vars ↔ ∃ d ∈ p.support, i ∈ d.support := by
classical simp only [vars_def, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_degrees, mem_support_iff, exists_prop]
theorem mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {x : σ →₀ ℕ} (H : x ∈ f.support)
{v : σ} (h : v ∉ vars f) : x v = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact (mem_vars v).mpr ⟨x, H, Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr h⟩
theorem vars_add_subset [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).vars ⊆ p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
intro x hx
simp only [vars_def, Finset.mem_union, Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hx ⊢
simpa using Multiset.mem_of_le degrees_add_le hx
theorem vars_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.vars q.vars) :
(p + q).vars = p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
refine (vars_add_subset p q).antisymm fun x hx => ?_
simp only [vars_def, Multiset.disjoint_toFinset] at h hx ⊢
rwa [degrees_add_of_disjoint h, Multiset.toFinset_union]
section Mul
theorem vars_mul [DecidableEq σ] (φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (φ * ψ).vars ⊆ φ.vars ∪ ψ.vars := by
simp_rw [vars_def, ← Multiset.toFinset_add, Multiset.toFinset_subset]
exact Multiset.subset_of_le degrees_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem vars_one : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ :=
vars_C
theorem vars_pow (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) : (φ ^ n).vars ⊆ φ.vars := by
classical
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ']
apply Finset.Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
exact Finset.union_subset (Finset.Subset.refl _) ih
/-- The variables of the product of a family of polynomials
are a subset of the union of the sets of variables of each polynomial.
-/
theorem vars_prod {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset ι} (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).vars ⊆ s.biUnion fun i => (f i).vars := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hs hsub =>
simp only [hs, Finset.biUnion_insert, Finset.prod_insert, not_false_iff]
apply Finset.Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
exact Finset.union_subset_union (Finset.Subset.refl _) hsub
section IsDomain
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
theorem vars_C_mul (a : A) (ha : a ≠ 0) (φ : MvPolynomial σ A) :
| (C a * φ : MvPolynomial σ A).vars = φ.vars := by
ext1 i
simp only [mem_vars, exists_prop, mem_support_iff]
apply exists_congr
intro d
apply and_congr _ Iff.rfl
rw [coeff_C_mul, mul_ne_zero_iff, eq_true ha, true_and]
end IsDomain
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Variables.lean | 146 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
/-!
# A predicate on adjoining roots of polynomial
This file defines a predicate `IsAdjoinRoot S f`, which states that the ring `S` can be
constructed by adjoining a specified root of the polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
This predicate is useful when the same ring can be generated by adjoining the root of different
polynomials, and you want to vary which polynomial you're considering.
The results in this file are intended to mirror those in `RingTheory.AdjoinRoot`,
in order to provide an easier way to translate results from one to the other.
## Motivation
`AdjoinRoot` presents one construction of a ring `R[α]`. However, it is possible to obtain
rings of this form in many ways, such as `NumberField.ringOfIntegers ℚ(√-5)`,
or `Algebra.adjoin R {α, α^2}`, or `IntermediateField.adjoin R {α, 2 - α}`,
or even if we want to view `ℂ` as adjoining a root of `X^2 + 1` to `ℝ`.
## Main definitions
The two main predicates in this file are:
* `IsAdjoinRoot S f`: `S` is generated by adjoining a specified root of `f : R[X]` to `R`
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic S f`: `S` is generated by adjoining a root of the monic polynomial
`f : R[X]` to `R`
Using `IsAdjoinRoot` to map into `S`:
* `IsAdjoinRoot.map`: inclusion from `R[X]` to `S`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.root`: the specific root adjoined to `R` to give `S`
Using `IsAdjoinRoot` to map out of `S`:
* `IsAdjoinRoot.repr`: choose a non-unique representative in `R[X]`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.lift`, `IsAdjoinRoot.liftHom`: lift a morphism `R →+* T` to `S →+* T`
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.modByMonicHom`: a unique representative in `R[X]` if `f` is monic
## Main results
* `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRoot` and `AdjoinRoot.isAdjoinRootMonic`:
`AdjoinRoot` satisfies the conditions on `IsAdjoinRoot`(`_monic`)
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`: the `root` generates a power basis on `S` over `R`
* `IsAdjoinRoot.aequiv`: algebra isomorphism showing adjoining a root gives a unique ring
up to isomorphism
* `IsAdjoinRoot.ofEquiv`: transfer `IsAdjoinRoot` across an algebra isomorphism
* `IsAdjoinRootMonic.minpoly_eq`: the minimal polynomial of the adjoined root of `f` is equal to
`f`, if `f` is irreducible and monic, and `R` is a GCD domain
-/
open scoped Polynomial
open Polynomial
noncomputable section
universe u v
-- Porting note: this looks like something that should not be here
-- section MoveMe
--
-- end MoveMe
-- This class doesn't really make sense on a predicate
/-- `IsAdjoinRoot S f` states that the ring `S` can be constructed by adjoining a specified root
of the polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
Compare `PowerBasis R S`, which does not explicitly specify which polynomial we adjoin a root of
(in particular `f` does not need to be the minimal polynomial of the root we adjoin),
and `AdjoinRoot` which constructs a new type.
This is not a typeclass because the choice of root given `S` and `f` is not unique.
-/
structure IsAdjoinRoot {R : Type u} (S : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : R[X]) : Type max u v where
map : R[X] →+* S
map_surjective : Function.Surjective map
ker_map : RingHom.ker map = Ideal.span {f}
algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R S = map.comp Polynomial.C
-- This class doesn't really make sense on a predicate
/-- `IsAdjoinRootMonic S f` states that the ring `S` can be constructed by adjoining a specified
root of the monic polynomial `f : R[X]` to `R`.
As long as `f` is monic, there is a well-defined representation of elements of `S` as polynomials
in `R[X]` of degree lower than `deg f` (see `modByMonicHom` and `coeff`). In particular,
we have `IsAdjoinRootMonic.powerBasis`.
Bundling `Monic` into this structure is very useful when working with explicit `f`s such as
`X^2 - C a * X - C b` since it saves you carrying around the proofs of monicity.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note: This linter does not exist yet.
structure IsAdjoinRootMonic {R : Type u} (S : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S]
(f : R[X]) extends IsAdjoinRoot S f where
Monic : Monic f
section Ring
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring S] {f : R[X]} [Algebra R S]
namespace IsAdjoinRoot
/-- `(h : IsAdjoinRoot S f).root` is the root of `f` that can be adjoined to generate `S`. -/
def root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : S :=
h.map X
theorem subsingleton (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton S :=
h.map_surjective.subsingleton
theorem algebraMap_apply (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : R) :
algebraMap R S x = h.map (Polynomial.C x) := by rw [h.algebraMap_eq, RingHom.comp_apply]
theorem mem_ker_map (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) {p} : p ∈ RingHom.ker h.map ↔ f ∣ p := by
rw [h.ker_map, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) {p} : h.map p = 0 ↔ f ∣ p := by
rw [← h.mem_ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker]
@[simp]
theorem map_X (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.map X = h.root := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_self (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.map f = 0 := h.map_eq_zero_iff.mpr dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (p : R[X]) : aeval h.root p = h.map p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun x => by rw [aeval_C, h.algebraMap_apply])
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [map_mul, aeval_C, map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, ← h.algebraMap_apply,
RingHom.map_pow, map_X]
theorem aeval_root (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : aeval h.root f = 0 := by rw [aeval_eq, map_self]
/-- Choose an arbitrary representative so that `h.map (h.repr x) = x`.
If `f` is monic, use `IsAdjoinRootMonic.modByMonicHom` for a unique choice of representative.
-/
def repr (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) : R[X] :=
(h.map_surjective x).choose
theorem map_repr (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x : S) : h.map (h.repr x) = x :=
(h.map_surjective x).choose_spec
/-- `repr` preserves zero, up to multiples of `f` -/
theorem repr_zero_mem_span (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) : h.repr 0 ∈ Ideal.span ({f} : Set R[X]) := by
rw [← h.ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker, h.map_repr]
/-- `repr` preserves addition, up to multiples of `f` -/
theorem repr_add_sub_repr_add_repr_mem_span (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (x y : S) :
h.repr (x + y) - (h.repr x + h.repr y) ∈ Ideal.span ({f} : Set R[X]) := by
rw [← h.ker_map, RingHom.mem_ker, map_sub, h.map_repr, map_add, h.map_repr, h.map_repr, sub_self]
/-- Extensionality of the `IsAdjoinRoot` structure itself. See `IsAdjoinRootMonic.ext_elem`
for extensionality of the ring elements. -/
theorem ext_map (h h' : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (eq : ∀ x, h.map x = h'.map x) : h = h' := by
cases h; cases h'; congr
exact RingHom.ext eq
/-- Extensionality of the `IsAdjoinRoot` structure itself. See `IsAdjoinRootMonic.ext_elem`
for extensionality of the ring elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext (h h' : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (eq : h.root = h'.root) : h = h' :=
h.ext_map h' fun x => by rw [← h.aeval_eq, ← h'.aeval_eq, eq]
section lift
variable {T : Type*} [CommRing T] {i : R →+* T} {x : T}
section
variable (hx : f.eval₂ i x = 0)
include hx
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `IsAdjoinRoot.lift` -/
theorem eval₂_repr_eq_eval₂_of_map_eq (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (z : S) (w : R[X])
(hzw : h.map w = z) : (h.repr z).eval₂ i x = w.eval₂ i x := by
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← h.map_repr z, ← map_sub, h.map_eq_zero_iff] at hzw
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hzw
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← eval₂_sub, hy, eval₂_mul, hx, zero_mul]
variable (i x)
-- To match `AdjoinRoot.lift`
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism `R →+* T` to `S →+* T` by specifying a root `x` of `f` in `T`,
| where `S` is given by adjoining a root of `f` to `R`. -/
def lift (h : IsAdjoinRoot S f) (hx : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : S →+* T where
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IsAdjoinRoot.lean | 194 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
theorem hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ￢a \ b = ￢b \ a := by simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint_comm
theorem hnot_le_comm : ￢a ≤ b ↔ ￢b ≤ a := by
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_right⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_left⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_hnot_right : Codisjoint a (￢a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 <| sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
theorem codisjoint_hnot_left : Codisjoint (￢a) a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint (￢a) b :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : Codisjoint a (￢b) :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.hnot_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : ￢a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
|
theorem IsCompl.eq_hnot (h : IsCompl a b) : a = ￢b :=
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 836 | 837 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
theorem add_den_dvd_lcm (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den.lcm q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq, Nat.div_dvd_iff_dvd_mul (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
(Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right (by simp)), ← Nat.gcd_mul_lcm,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (Nat.lcm_ne_zero (by simp) (by simp)), Nat.dvd_gcd_iff]
refine ⟨?_, dvd_mul_right _ _⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs]
apply Int.dvd_add
<;> apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right <;> rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
<;> [exact Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _; exact Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _]
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).num = q₁.num * q₂.num / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_den (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).den =
q₁.den * q₂.den / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num := by
rw [mul_num, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Int.ofNat_one, Int.ediv_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem mul_self_den (q : ℚ) : (q * q).den = q.den * q.den := by
rw [Rat.mul_den, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem add_num_den (q r : ℚ) :
q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num : ℤ) /. (↑q.den * ↑r.den : ℤ) := by
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.den_pos
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.den_pos
conv_lhs => rw [← num_divInt_den q, ← num_divInt_den r, divInt_add_divInt _ _ hqd hrd]
rw [mul_comm r.num q.den]
theorem isSquare_iff {q : ℚ} : IsSquare q ↔ IsSquare q.num ∧ IsSquare q.den := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨qr, rfl⟩
rw [Rat.mul_self_num, mul_self_den]
simp only [IsSquare.mul_self, and_self]
· rintro ⟨⟨nr, hnr⟩, ⟨dr, hdr⟩⟩
refine ⟨nr / dr, ?_⟩
rw [div_mul_div_comm, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← hnr, ← hdr, num_div_den]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : IsSquare (n : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare n := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, num_natCast, den_natCast, IsSquare.one, and_true, Int.isSquare_natCast_iff]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} : IsSquare (z : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare z := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, intCast_num, intCast_den, IsSquare.one, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem isSquare_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsSquare (ofNat(n) : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
isSquare_natCast_iff
section Casts
theorem exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (n : ℤ) {d : ℤ} (d_ne_zero : d ≠ 0) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).den :=
haveI : (n : ℚ) / d = Rat.divInt n d := by rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div]
Rat.num_den_mk d_ne_zero this
theorem mul_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q * r).num * q.den * r.den = q.num * r.num * (q * r).den := by
let s := q.num * r.num /. (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.num) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
rw [Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_mul_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h, mul_comm, ← Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul, ← divInt_eq_div]
theorem add_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q + r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) * (q + r).den := by
let s := divInt (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
repeat rw [Int.mul_assoc]
apply mul_eq_mul_left_iff.2
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_add_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h]
rw [mul_comm]
apply Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul.mp
rw [← divInt_eq_div]
theorem substr_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q - r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den - r.num * q.den) * (q - r).den := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← num_neg_eq_neg_num, ← den_neg_eq_den r,
add_num_den' q (-r)]
end Casts
protected theorem inv_neg (q : ℚ) : (-q)⁻¹ = -q⁻¹ := by
rw [← num_divInt_den q]
simp only [Rat.neg_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', eq_self_iff_true, Rat.divInt_neg]
theorem num_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
(a / b : ℚ).num = a := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem den_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
((a / b : ℚ).den : ℤ) = b := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem div_int_inj {a b c d : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hd0 : 0 < d) (h1 : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs)
(h2 : Nat.Coprime c.natAbs d.natAbs) (h : (a : ℚ) / b = (c : ℚ) / d) : a = c ∧ b = d := by
apply And.intro
· rw [← num_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, num_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
· rw [← den_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, den_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_div_self (n : ℤ) : ((n / n : ℤ) : ℚ) = n / n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp only [Int.cast_zero, Int.zero_tdiv, zero_div, Int.ediv_zero]
· have : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by rwa [← coe_int_inj] at hn
simp only [Int.ediv_self hn, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff, div_self this]
@[norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div_self (n : ℕ) : ((n / n : ℕ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
intCast_div_self n
theorem intCast_div (a b : ℤ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℤ) : ℚ) = a / b := by
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [mul_comm b, Int.mul_ediv_assoc c (dvd_refl b), Int.cast_mul,
intCast_div_self, Int.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc]
theorem natCast_div (a b : ℕ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℕ) : ℚ) = a / b :=
intCast_div a b (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr h)
theorem den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℤ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m := by
replace hn : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := num_ne_zero.mp hn
constructor
· rw [Rat.den_eq_one_iff, eq_div_iff hn]
exact mod_cast (Dvd.intro_left _)
· exact (intCast_div _ _ · ▸ rfl)
theorem den_div_natCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m :=
(den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff m n (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hn)).trans Int.ofNat_dvd
theorem inv_intCast_num_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply num_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_num_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_intCast_num_of_pos (mod_cast ha0 : 0 < (a : ℤ))
theorem inv_intCast_den_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : ((a : ℚ)⁻¹.den : ℤ) = a := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply den_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_den_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = a := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, ← Int.cast_natCast a, inv_intCast_den_of_pos]
rwa [Int.natCast_pos]
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_num (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with lt | rfl | gt
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, -b = a := ⟨-a, a.neg_neg⟩
simp at lt
simp [Rat.inv_neg, inv_intCast_num_of_pos lt, Int.sign_eq_one_iff_pos.mpr lt]
· simp
· simp [inv_intCast_num_of_pos gt, Int.sign_eq_one_iff_pos.mpr gt]
@[simp]
theorem inv_natCast_num (a : ℕ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a :=
inv_intCast_num a
@[simp]
theorem inv_ofNat_num (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_natCast_num_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_neZero a)
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_den (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = if a = 0 then 1 else a.natAbs := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj]
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with lt | rfl | gt
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, -b = a := ⟨-a, a.neg_neg⟩
simp at lt
rw [if_neg (by omega)]
simp only [Int.cast_neg, Rat.inv_neg, neg_den, inv_intCast_den_of_pos lt, Int.natAbs_neg]
exact Int.eq_natAbs_of_nonneg (by omega)
· simp
· rw [if_neg (by omega)]
simp only [inv_intCast_den_of_pos gt]
exact Int.eq_natAbs_of_nonneg (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem inv_natCast_den (a : ℕ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = if a = 0 then 1 else a := by
simpa [-inv_intCast_den, ofInt_eq_cast] using inv_intCast_den a
@[simp]
theorem inv_ofNat_den (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(a) : ℚ)⁻¹.den = OfNat.ofNat a :=
inv_natCast_den_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_neZero a)
protected theorem «forall» {p : ℚ → Prop} : (∀ r, p r) ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, p (a / b) :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h _,
fun h q => by
have := h q.num q.den
rwa [Int.cast_natCast, num_div_den q] at this⟩
protected theorem «exists» {p : ℚ → Prop} : (∃ r, p r) ↔ ∃ a b : ℤ, p (a / b) :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => ⟨r.num, r.den, by convert hr; convert num_div_den r⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-!
### Denominator as `ℕ+`
-/
section PNatDen
/-- Denominator as `ℕ+`. -/
def pnatDen (x : ℚ) : ℕ+ :=
⟨x.den, x.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_pnatDen (x : ℚ) : (x.pnatDen : ℕ) = x.den :=
rfl
theorem pnatDen_eq_iff_den_eq {x : ℚ} {n : ℕ+} : x.pnatDen = n ↔ x.den = ↑n :=
Subtype.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem pnatDen_one : (1 : ℚ).pnatDen = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pnatDen_zero : (0 : ℚ).pnatDen = 1 :=
rfl
end PNatDen
end Rat
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 338 | 342 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Small.Module
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Projective
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.BaseChange
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
/-!
# Finitely Presented Modules
## Main definition
- `Module.FinitePresentation`: A module is finitely presented if it is generated by some
finite set `s` and the kernel of the presentation `Rˢ → M` is also finitely generated.
## Main results
- `Module.finitePresentation_iff_finite`: If `R` is noetherian, then f.p. iff f.g. on `R`-modules.
Suppose `0 → K → M → N → 0` is an exact sequence of `R`-modules.
- `Module.finitePresentation_of_surjective`: If `M` is f.p., `K` is f.g., then `N` is f.p.
- `Module.FinitePresentation.fg_ker`: If `M` is f.g., `N` is f.p., then `K` is f.g.
- `Module.finitePresentation_of_ker`: If `N` and `K` is f.p., then `M` is also f.p.
- `Module.FinitePresentation.isLocalizedModule_map`: If `M` and `N` are `R`-modules and `M` is f.p.,
and `S` is a submonoid of `R`, then `Hom(Mₛ, Nₛ)` is the localization of `Hom(M, N)`.
Also the instances finite + free => f.p. => finite are also provided
## TODO
Suppose `S` is an `R`-algebra, `M` is an `S`-module. Then
1. If `S` is f.p., then `M` is `R`-f.p. implies `M` is `S`-f.p.
2. If `S` is both f.p. (as an algebra) and finite (as a module),
then `M` is `S`-fp implies that `M` is `R`-f.p.
3. If `S` is f.p. as a module, then `S` is f.p. as an algebra.
In particular,
4. `S` is f.p. as an `R`-module iff it is f.p. as an algebra and is finite as a module.
For finitely presented algebras, see `Algebra.FinitePresentation`
in file `Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation`.
-/
open Finsupp
section Semiring
variable (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/--
A module is finitely presented if it is finitely generated by some set `s`
and the kernel of the presentation `Rˢ → M` is also finitely generated.
-/
class Module.FinitePresentation : Prop where
out : ∃ (s : Finset M), Submodule.span R (s : Set M) = ⊤ ∧
(LinearMap.ker (Finsupp.linearCombination R ((↑) : s → M))).FG
instance (priority := 100) [h : Module.FinitePresentation R M] : Module.Finite R M := by
obtain ⟨s, hs₁, _⟩ := h
exact ⟨s, hs₁⟩
end Semiring
section Ring
section
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (M : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem Module.FinitePresentation.exists_fin [fp : Module.FinitePresentation R M] :
∃ (n : ℕ) (K : Submodule R (Fin n → R)) (_ : M ≃ₗ[R] (Fin n → R) ⧸ K), K.FG := by
have ⟨ι, ⟨hι₁, hι₂⟩⟩ := fp
refine ⟨_, LinearMap.ker (linearCombination R Subtype.val ∘ₗ
(lcongr ι.equivFin (.refl ..) ≪≫ₗ linearEquivFunOnFinite R R _).symm.toLinearMap),
(LinearMap.quotKerEquivOfSurjective _ <| LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp ?_).symm, ?_⟩
· simpa [range_linearCombination] using hι₁
· simpa [LinearMap.ker_comp, Submodule.comap_equiv_eq_map_symm] using hι₂.map _
/-- A finitely presented module is isomorphic to the quotient of a finite free module by a finitely
generated submodule. -/
theorem Module.FinitePresentation.equiv_quotient [Module.FinitePresentation R M] [Small.{v} R] :
∃ (L : Type v) (_ : AddCommGroup L) (_ : Module R L) (K : Submodule R L)
(_ : M ≃ₗ[R] L ⧸ K), Module.Free R L ∧ Module.Finite R L ∧ K.FG :=
have ⟨_n, _K, e, fg⟩ := Module.FinitePresentation.exists_fin R M
let es := linearEquivShrink
⟨_, inferInstance, inferInstance, _, e ≪≫ₗ Submodule.Quotient.equiv _ _ (es ..) rfl,
.of_equiv (es ..), .equiv (es ..), fg.map (es ..).toLinearMap⟩
end
variable (R M N) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
-- Ideally this should be an instance but it makes mathlib much slower.
lemma Module.finitePresentation_of_finite [IsNoetherianRing R] [h : Module.Finite R M] :
Module.FinitePresentation R M := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h
exact ⟨s, hs, IsNoetherian.noetherian _⟩
lemma Module.finitePresentation_iff_finite [IsNoetherianRing R] :
Module.FinitePresentation R M ↔ Module.Finite R M :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ finitePresentation_of_finite R M⟩
variable {R M N}
lemma Module.finitePresentation_of_free_of_surjective [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
(l : M →ₗ[R] N)
(hl : Function.Surjective l) (hl' : (LinearMap.ker l).FG) :
Module.FinitePresentation R N := by
classical
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M
let π : Free.ChooseBasisIndex R M → (Set.finite_range (l ∘ b)).toFinset :=
fun i ↦ ⟨l (b i), by simp⟩
have : π.Surjective := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ : ∃ a, l (b a) = x := by simpa using hx
exact ⟨y, rfl⟩
choose σ hσ using this
have hπ : Subtype.val ∘ π = l ∘ b := rfl
have hσ₁ : π ∘ σ = id := by ext i; exact congr_arg Subtype.val (hσ i)
have hσ₂ : l ∘ b ∘ σ = Subtype.val := by ext i; exact congr_arg Subtype.val (hσ i)
refine ⟨(Set.finite_range (l ∘ b)).toFinset,
by simpa [Set.range_comp, LinearMap.range_eq_top], ?_⟩
let f : M →ₗ[R] (Set.finite_range (l ∘ b)).toFinset →₀ R :=
Finsupp.lmapDomain _ _ π ∘ₗ b.repr.toLinearMap
convert hl'.map f
ext x; simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker, Submodule.mem_map]
constructor
· intro hx
refine ⟨b.repr.symm (x.mapDomain σ), ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [Finsupp.apply_linearCombination, hσ₂, hx]
· simp only [f, LinearMap.comp_apply, b.repr.apply_symm_apply,
LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply]
rw [← Finsupp.mapDomain_comp, hσ₁, Finsupp.mapDomain_id]
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
simp [f, hπ, ← Finsupp.apply_linearCombination, hy]
-- Ideally this should be an instance but it makes mathlib much slower.
variable (R M) in
lemma Module.finitePresentation_of_projective [Projective R M] [Module.Finite R M] :
FinitePresentation R M :=
have ⟨_n, _f, _g, surj, _, hfg⟩ := Finite.exists_comp_eq_id_of_projective R M
Module.finitePresentation_of_free_of_surjective _ surj
(Finite.iff_fg.mp <| LinearMap.ker_eq_range_of_comp_eq_id hfg ▸ inferInstance)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-06")]
alias Module.finitePresentation_of_free := Module.finitePresentation_of_projective
variable {ι} [Finite ι]
instance : Module.FinitePresentation R R := Module.finitePresentation_of_projective _ _
instance : Module.FinitePresentation R (ι →₀ R) := Module.finitePresentation_of_projective _ _
instance : Module.FinitePresentation R (ι → R) := Module.finitePresentation_of_projective _ _
lemma Module.finitePresentation_of_surjective [h : Module.FinitePresentation R M] (l : M →ₗ[R] N)
(hl : Function.Surjective l) (hl' : (LinearMap.ker l).FG) :
Module.FinitePresentation R N := by
classical
obtain ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩ := h
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := hl'
have H : Function.Surjective (Finsupp.linearCombination R ((↑) : s → M)) :=
LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp
(by rw [range_linearCombination, Subtype.range_val, ← hs]; rfl)
apply Module.finitePresentation_of_free_of_surjective (l ∘ₗ linearCombination R Subtype.val)
(hl.comp H)
choose σ hσ using (show _ from H)
have : Finsupp.linearCombination R Subtype.val '' (σ '' t) = t := by
simp only [Set.image_image, hσ, Set.image_id']
rw [LinearMap.ker_comp, ← ht, ← this, ← Submodule.map_span, Submodule.comap_map_eq,
← Finset.coe_image]
exact Submodule.FG.sup ⟨_, rfl⟩ hs'
lemma Module.FinitePresentation.fg_ker [Module.Finite R M]
[h : Module.FinitePresentation R N] (l : M →ₗ[R] N) (hl : Function.Surjective l) :
(LinearMap.ker l).FG := by
classical
| obtain ⟨s, hs, hs'⟩ := h
have H : Function.Surjective (Finsupp.linearCombination R ((↑) : s → N)) :=
LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp
(by rw [range_linearCombination, Subtype.range_val, ← hs]; rfl)
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ f : (s →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M, l ∘ₗ f = (Finsupp.linearCombination R Subtype.val) := by
choose f hf using show _ from hl
exact ⟨Finsupp.linearCombination R (fun i ↦ f i), by ext; simp [hf]⟩
have : (LinearMap.ker l).map (LinearMap.range f).mkQ = ⊤ := by
rw [← top_le_iff]
rintro x -
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mkQ_surjective _ x
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := H (l x)
rw [← hf, LinearMap.comp_apply, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub] at hy
exact ⟨_, hy, by simp⟩
apply Submodule.fg_of_fg_map_of_fg_inf_ker (LinearMap.range f).mkQ
· rw [this]
exact Module.Finite.fg_top
· rw [Submodule.ker_mkQ, inf_comm, ← Submodule.map_comap_eq, ← LinearMap.ker_comp, hf]
exact hs'.map f
lemma Module.FinitePresentation.fg_ker_iff [Module.FinitePresentation R M]
(l : M →ₗ[R] N) (hl : Function.Surjective l) :
Submodule.FG (LinearMap.ker l) ↔ Module.FinitePresentation R N :=
⟨finitePresentation_of_surjective l hl, fun _ ↦ fg_ker l hl⟩
lemma Module.finitePresentation_of_ker [Module.FinitePresentation R N]
(l : M →ₗ[R] N) (hl : Function.Surjective l) [Module.FinitePresentation R (LinearMap.ker l)] :
Module.FinitePresentation R M := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ : (⊤ : Submodule R M).FG := by
apply Submodule.fg_of_fg_map_of_fg_inf_ker l
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/FinitePresentation.lean | 187 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, María Inés de Frutos-Fernández, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.AdicValuation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
/-!
# Generalities on the polynomial structure of rational functions
* Main evaluation properties
* Study of the X-adic valuation
## Main definitions
- `RatFunc.C` is the constant polynomial
- `RatFunc.X` is the indeterminate
- `RatFunc.eval` evaluates a rational function given a value for the indeterminate
- `idealX` is the principal ideal generated by `X` in the ring of polynomials over a field K,
regarded as an element of the height-one-spectrum.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section Eval
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
open RatFunc
/-! ### Polynomial structure: `C`, `X`, `eval` -/
section Domain
variable [CommRing K] [IsDomain K]
/-- `RatFunc.C a` is the constant rational function `a`. -/
def C : K →+* RatFunc K := algebraMap _ _
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq_C : algebraMap K (RatFunc K) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_C (a : K) : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) (Polynomial.C a) = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_comp_C : (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K)).comp Polynomial.C = C :=
rfl
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (r : K) (x : RatFunc K) : r • x = C r * x := by
rw [Algebra.smul_def, algebraMap_eq_C]
/-- `RatFunc.X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : RatFunc K :=
algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) Polynomial.X
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_X : algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) Polynomial.X = X :=
rfl
end Domain
section Field
variable [Field K]
@[simp]
theorem num_C (c : K) : num (C c) = Polynomial.C c :=
num_algebraMap _
@[simp]
theorem denom_C (c : K) : denom (C c) = 1 :=
denom_algebraMap _
@[simp]
theorem num_X : num (X : RatFunc K) = Polynomial.X :=
num_algebraMap _
@[simp]
theorem denom_X : denom (X : RatFunc K) = 1 :=
denom_algebraMap _
theorem X_ne_zero : (X : RatFunc K) ≠ 0 :=
RatFunc.algebraMap_ne_zero Polynomial.X_ne_zero
variable {L : Type u} [Field L]
/-- Evaluate a rational function `p` given a ring hom `f` from the scalar field
to the target and a value `x` for the variable in the target.
Fractions are reduced by clearing common denominators before evaluating:
`eval id 1 ((X^2 - 1) / (X - 1)) = eval id 1 (X + 1) = 2`, not `0 / 0 = 0`.
-/
def eval (f : K →+* L) (a : L) (p : RatFunc K) : L :=
(num p).eval₂ f a / (denom p).eval₂ f a
variable {f : K →+* L} {a : L}
theorem eval_eq_zero_of_eval₂_denom_eq_zero {x : RatFunc K}
(h : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom x) = 0) : eval f a x = 0 := by rw [eval, h, div_zero]
theorem eval₂_denom_ne_zero {x : RatFunc K} (h : eval f a x ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom x) ≠ 0 :=
mt eval_eq_zero_of_eval₂_denom_eq_zero h
variable (f a)
@[simp]
theorem eval_C {c : K} : eval f a (C c) = f c := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem eval_X : eval f a X = a := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero : eval f a 0 = 0 := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem eval_one : eval f a 1 = 1 := by simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem eval_algebraMap {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S K[X]] (p : S) :
eval f a (algebraMap _ _ p) = (algebraMap _ K[X] p).eval₂ f a := by
simp [eval, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply S K[X] (RatFunc K)]
/-- `eval` is an additive homomorphism except when a denominator evaluates to `0`.
Counterexample: `eval _ 1 (X / (X-1)) + eval _ 1 (-1 / (X-1)) = 0`
`... ≠ 1 = eval _ 1 ((X-1) / (X-1))`.
See also `RatFunc.eval₂_denom_ne_zero` to make the hypotheses simpler but less general.
-/
theorem eval_add {x y : RatFunc K} (hx : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom x) ≠ 0)
| (hy : Polynomial.eval₂ f a (denom y) ≠ 0) : eval f a (x + y) = eval f a x + eval f a y := by
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/AsPolynomial.lean | 143 | 143 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.hasProd_iff := IsInducing.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.map_tprod [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] (hf : Multipliable f)
{G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
g (∏' i, f i) = ∏' i, g (f i) := (HasProd.tprod_eq (HasProd.map hf.hasProd g hg)).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma Topology.IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[T2Space γ] {G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable (g ∘ f) ∧ ∏' i, g (f i) ∈ Set.range g := by
constructor
· intro hf
constructor
· exact hf.map g hg.continuous
· use ∏' i, f i
exact hf.map_tprod g hg.continuous
· rintro ⟨hgf, a, ha⟩
use a
have := hgf.hasProd
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← ha] at this
exact (hg.hasProd_iff f a).mp this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range :=
IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range
/-- "A special case of `Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience" -/
@[to_additive "A special case of `Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience"]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_equiv [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[EquivLike G α γ] [MulEquivClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g)
(hg' : Continuous (EquivLike.inv g : γ → α)) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse g (g : α ≃* γ).symm hg hg' (EquivLike.left_inv g)
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Surjective.multipliable_iff_of_hasProd_iff {α' : Type*} [CommMonoid α']
[TopologicalSpace α'] {e : α' → α} (hes : Function.Surjective e) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, HasProd f (e a) ↔ HasProd g a) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
hes.exists.trans <| exists_congr <| @he
variable [ContinuousMul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul (hf : HasProd f a) (hg : HasProd g b) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b * g b) (a * b) := by
dsimp only [HasProd] at hf hg ⊢
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib]
exact hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b * g b :=
(hf.hasProd.mul hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : Finset γ} :
(∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f i) (a i)) → HasProd (fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [hasProd_one, prod_empty, forall_true_iff]) <| by
simp +contextual only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_iff,
prod_insert, and_imp]
exact fun x s _ IH hx h ↦ hx.mul (IH h)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_prod {f : γ → β → α} {s : Finset γ} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Multipliable (f i)) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b :=
(hasProd_prod fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_disjoint {s t : Set β} (hs : Disjoint s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (s ∪ t : Set β) → α) (a * b) := by
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Set.mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint hs]
exact ha.mul hb
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod_disjoint {ι} (s : Finset ι) {t : ι → Set β} {a : ι → α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t i → α) (a i)) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) → α) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
simp_rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion _ _ hs]
exact hasProd_prod hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_isCompl {s t : Set β} (hs : IsCompl s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) := by
simpa [← hs.compl_eq] using
(hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 ha).mul (hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 hb)
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_compl {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul_compl {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.mul_compl hsc.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.compl_mul {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl.symm hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.compl_add {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.compl_mul hsc.hasProd).multipliable
/-- Version of `HasProd.update` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`,
it gives a relationship between the products of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `HasSum.update` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist."]
theorem HasProd.update' {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a a' : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (x : α)
(hf' : HasProd (update f b x) a') : a * x = a' * f b := by
have : ∀ b', f b' * ite (b' = b) x 1 = update f b x b' * ite (b' = b) (f b) 1 := by
intro b'
split_ifs with hb'
· simpa only [Function.update_apply, hb', eq_self_iff_true] using mul_comm (f b) x
· simp only [Function.update_apply, hb', if_false]
have h := hf.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b x)
simp_rw [this] at h
exact HasProd.unique h (hf'.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b (f b)))
/-- Version of `hasProd_ite_div_hasProd` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`, it gives
a relationship between the products of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist."]
theorem eq_mul_of_hasProd_ite {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (a' : α)
(hf' : HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) a') : a = a' * f b := by
refine (mul_one a).symm.trans (hf.update' b 1 ?_)
convert hf'
apply update_apply
end HasProd
section tprod
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_set_coe (f : β → α) {s t : Set β} (h : s = t) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x : t, f x := by rw [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_subtype (f : β → α) {P Q : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) :
∏' x : {x // P x}, f x = ∏' x : {x // Q x}, f x :=
tprod_congr_set_coe f <| Set.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_finprod (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ᶠ b, f b := by simp [tprod_def, multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport hf, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod' {s : Finset β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_finprod (s.finite_toSet.subset hf), finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod {s : Finset β} (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b :=
tprod_eq_prod' <| mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_one : ∏' _ : β, (1 : α) = 1 := by rw [tprod_eq_finprod] <;> simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_empty [IsEmpty β] : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := (∅ : Finset β))] <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr {f g : β → α}
(hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∏' b, f b = ∏' b, g b :=
congr_arg tprod (funext hfg)
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_fintype [Fintype β] (f : β → α) : ∏' b, f b = ∏ b, f b := by
apply tprod_eq_prod; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_tprod_mulIndicator (f : β → α) (s : Finset β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏' x, Set.mulIndicator (↑s) f x := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod' (Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset),
Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset _ Finset.Subset.rfl]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_bool (f : Bool → α) : ∏' i : Bool, f i = f false * f true := by
rw [tprod_fintype, Fintype.prod_bool, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_mulSingle {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' = 1) :
∏' b, f b = f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := {b}), prod_singleton]
exact fun b' hb' ↦ hf b' (by simpa using hb')
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_tprod_eq_mulSingle (f : β → γ → α) (b : β) (c : γ) (hfb : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' c = 1)
(hfc : ∀ b', ∀ c' ≠ c, f b' c' = 1) : ∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = f b c :=
calc
∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = ∏' b', f b' c := tprod_congr fun b' ↦ tprod_eq_mulSingle _ (hfc b')
_ = f b c := tprod_eq_mulSingle _ hfb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
∏' b', (if b' = b then a else 1) = a := by
rw [tprod_eq_mulSingle b]
· simp
· intro b' hb'; simp [hb']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : { x // x ∈ s }, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← prod_attach]; exact tprod_fintype _
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype' (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : (s : Set β), f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_singleton (b : β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : ({b} : Set β), f x = f b := by
rw [← coe_singleton, Finset.tprod_subtype', prod_singleton]
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.tprod_eq {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) {f : β → α}
(hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range g) : ∏' c, f (g c) = ∏' b, f b := by
have : mulSupport f = g '' mulSupport (f ∘ g) := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff.2 hf]
rw [← Function.comp_def]
by_cases hf_fin : (mulSupport f).Finite
· have hfg_fin : (mulSupport (f ∘ g)).Finite := hf_fin.preimage hg.injOn
lift g to γ ↪ β using hg
simp_rw [tprod_eq_prod' hf_fin.coe_toFinset.ge, tprod_eq_prod' hfg_fin.coe_toFinset.ge,
comp_apply, ← Finset.prod_map]
refine Finset.prod_congr (Finset.coe_injective ?_) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
simp [this]
· have hf_fin' : ¬ Set.Finite (mulSupport (f ∘ g)) := by
rwa [this, Set.finite_image_iff hg.injOn] at hf_fin
simp_rw [tprod_def, if_neg hf_fin, if_neg hf_fin', Multipliable,
funext fun a => propext <| hg.hasProd_iff (mulSupport_subset_iff'.1 hf) (a := a)]
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.tprod_eq (e : γ ≃ β) (f : β → α) : ∏' c, f (e c) = ∏' b, f b :=
e.injective.tprod_eq <| by simp
/-! ### `tprod` on subsets - part 1 -/
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
Subtype.val_injective.tprod_eq <| by simpa
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype_mulSupport (f : β → α) : ∏' x : mulSupport f, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset Set.Subset.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_subtype (s : Set β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x, s.mulIndicator f x := by
rw [← tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset, tprod_congr]
simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_univ (f : β → α) : ∏' x : (Set.univ : Set β), f x = ∏' x, f x :=
tprod_subtype_eq_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_image {g : γ → β} (f : β → α) {s : Set γ} (hg : Set.InjOn g s) :
∏' x : g '' s, f x = ∏' x : s, f (g x) :=
((Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn _ _ hg).tprod_eq fun x ↦ f x).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_range {g : γ → β} (f : β → α) (hg : Injective g) :
∏' x : Set.range g, f x = ∏' x, f (g x) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ, tprod_image f hg.injOn]
simp_rw [← comp_apply (g := g), tprod_univ (f ∘ g)]
/-- If `f b = 1` for all `b ∈ t`, then the product of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the
product of `f a` with `a ∈ s ∖ t`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f b = 0` for all `b ∈ t`, then the sum of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the
sum of `f a` with `a ∈ s ∖ t`."]
lemma tprod_setElem_eq_tprod_setElem_diff {f : β → α} (s t : Set β)
(hf₀ : ∀ b ∈ t, f b = 1) :
∏' a : s, f a = ∏' a : (s \ t : Set β), f a :=
.symm <| (Set.inclusion_injective (t := s) Set.diff_subset).tprod_eq (f := f ∘ (↑)) <|
mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 fun b hb ↦ hf₀ b <| by simpa using hb
/-- If `f b = 1`, then the product of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the product of `f a` for
`a ∈ s ∖ {b}`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f b = 0`, then the sum of `f a` with `a ∈ s` is the same as the sum of `f a`
for `a ∈ s ∖ {b}`."]
lemma tprod_eq_tprod_diff_singleton {f : β → α} (s : Set β) {b : β} (hf₀ : f b = 1) :
∏' a : s, f a = ∏' a : (s \ {b} : Set β), f a :=
tprod_setElem_eq_tprod_setElem_diff s {b} fun _ ha ↦ ha ▸ hf₀
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_tprod_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β) (hi : Injective i)
(hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i) (hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : ∏' x, f x = ∏' y, g y := by
rw [← tprod_subtype_mulSupport g, ← hi.tprod_eq hf]
simp only [hfg]
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.tprod_eq_tprod_of_mulSupport {f : β → α} {g : γ → α}
(e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g) (he : ∀ x, g (e x) = f x) :
∏' x, f x = ∏' y, g y :=
.symm <| tprod_eq_tprod_of_ne_one_bij _ (Subtype.val_injective.comp e.injective) (by simp) he
| @[to_additive]
theorem tprod_dite_right (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x : β → ¬P → α) :
∏' b : β, (if h : P then (1 : α) else x b h) = if h : P then (1 : α) else ∏' b : β, x b h := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 526 | 528 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Stevens. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Stevens, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Central binomial coefficients
This file proves properties of the central binomial coefficients (that is, `Nat.choose (2 * n) n`).
## Main definition and results
* `Nat.centralBinom`: the central binomial coefficient, `(2 * n).choose n`.
* `Nat.succ_mul_centralBinom_succ`: the inductive relationship between successive central binomial
coefficients.
* `Nat.four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom`: an exponential lower bound on the central binomial
coefficient.
* `succ_dvd_centralBinom`: The result that `n+1 ∣ n.centralBinom`, ensuring that the explicit
definition of the Catalan numbers is integer-valued.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- The central binomial coefficient, `Nat.choose (2 * n) n`.
-/
def centralBinom (n : ℕ) :=
(2 * n).choose n
theorem centralBinom_eq_two_mul_choose (n : ℕ) : centralBinom n = (2 * n).choose n :=
rfl
theorem centralBinom_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < centralBinom n :=
choose_pos (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ zero_lt_two)
theorem centralBinom_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : centralBinom n ≠ 0 :=
(centralBinom_pos n).ne'
@[simp]
theorem centralBinom_zero : centralBinom 0 = 1 :=
choose_zero_right _
/-- The central binomial coefficient is the largest binomial coefficient.
-/
theorem choose_le_centralBinom (r n : ℕ) : choose (2 * n) r ≤ centralBinom n :=
calc
(2 * n).choose r ≤ (2 * n).choose (2 * n / 2) := choose_le_middle r (2 * n)
_ = (2 * n).choose n := by rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left n zero_lt_two]
theorem two_le_centralBinom (n : ℕ) (n_pos : 0 < n) : 2 ≤ centralBinom n :=
calc
2 ≤ 2 * n := Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ n_pos
_ = (2 * n).choose 1 := (choose_one_right (2 * n)).symm
_ ≤ centralBinom n := choose_le_centralBinom 1 n
/-- An inductive property of the central binomial coefficient.
-/
theorem succ_mul_centralBinom_succ (n : ℕ) :
(n + 1) * centralBinom (n + 1) = 2 * (2 * n + 1) * centralBinom n :=
calc
(n + 1) * (2 * (n + 1)).choose (n + 1) = (2 * n + 2).choose (n + 1) * (n + 1) := mul_comm _ _
_ = (2 * n + 1).choose n * (2 * n + 2) := by rw [choose_succ_right_eq, choose_mul_succ_eq]
_ = 2 * ((2 * n + 1).choose n * (n + 1)) := by ring
_ = 2 * ((2 * n + 1).choose n * (2 * n + 1 - n)) := by rw [two_mul n, add_assoc,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
_ = 2 * ((2 * n).choose n * (2 * n + 1)) := by rw [choose_mul_succ_eq]
_ = 2 * (2 * n + 1) * (2 * n).choose n := by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (2 * n + 1)]
/-- An exponential lower bound on the central binomial coefficient.
This bound is of interest because it appears in
[Tochiori's refinement of Erdős's proof of Bertrand's postulate](tochiori_bertrand).
-/
theorem four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom (n : ℕ) (n_big : 4 ≤ n) : 4 ^ n < n * centralBinom n := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rcases lt_trichotomy n 4 with (hn | rfl | hn)
· clear IH; exact False.elim ((not_lt.2 n_big) hn)
· norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_zero_of_lt hn)
calc
4 ^ (n + 1) < 4 * (n * centralBinom n) := lt_of_eq_of_lt pow_succ' <|
(mul_lt_mul_left <| zero_lt_four' ℕ).mpr (IH n n.lt_succ_self (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hn))
_ ≤ 2 * (2 * n + 1) * centralBinom n := by rw [← mul_assoc]; linarith
_ = (n + 1) * centralBinom (n + 1) := (succ_mul_centralBinom_succ n).symm
/-- An exponential lower bound on the central binomial coefficient.
This bound is weaker than `Nat.four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom`, but it is of historical interest
because it appears in Erdős's proof of Bertrand's postulate.
-/
theorem four_pow_le_two_mul_self_mul_centralBinom :
∀ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), 4 ^ n ≤ 2 * n * centralBinom n
| 0, pr => (Nat.not_lt_zero _ pr).elim
| 1, _ => by norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
| 2, _ => by norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
| 3, _ => by norm_num [centralBinom, choose]
| n + 4, _ =>
calc
4 ^ (n+4) ≤ (n+4) * centralBinom (n+4) := (four_pow_lt_mul_centralBinom _ le_add_self).le
_ ≤ 2 * (n+4) * centralBinom (n+4) := by
rw [mul_assoc]; refine Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ zero_lt_two
theorem two_dvd_centralBinom_succ (n : ℕ) : 2 ∣ centralBinom (n + 1) := by
use (n + 1 + n).choose n
rw [centralBinom_eq_two_mul_choose, two_mul, ← add_assoc,
choose_succ_succ' (n + 1 + n) n, choose_symm_add, ← two_mul]
theorem two_dvd_centralBinom_of_one_le {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : 2 ∣ centralBinom n := by
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h]
exact two_dvd_centralBinom_succ n.pred
/-- A crucial lemma to ensure that Catalan numbers can be defined via their explicit formula
`catalan n = n.centralBinom / (n + 1)`. -/
theorem succ_dvd_centralBinom (n : ℕ) : n + 1 ∣ n.centralBinom := by
| have h_s : (n + 1).Coprime (2 * n + 1) := by
rw [two_mul, add_assoc, coprime_add_self_right, coprime_self_add_left]
exact coprime_one_left n
apply h_s.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Central.lean | 118 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
/-!
# Products and coproducts in the category of topological spaces
-/
open CategoryTheory Limits Set TopologicalSpace Topology
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [Category.{w} J]
/-- The projection from the product as a bundled continuous map. -/
abbrev piπ {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) : TopCat.of (∀ i, α i) ⟶ α i :=
ofHom ⟨fun f => f i, continuous_apply i⟩
/-- The explicit fan of a family of topological spaces given by the pi type. -/
@[simps! pt π_app]
def piFan {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : Fan α :=
Fan.mk (TopCat.of (∀ i, α i)) (piπ.{v,u} α)
/-- The constructed fan is indeed a limit -/
def piFanIsLimit {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : IsLimit (piFan α) where
lift S := ofHom
{ toFun := fun s i => S.π.app ⟨i⟩ s
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi (fun i => (S.π.app ⟨i⟩).hom.2) }
uniq := by
intro S m h
ext x
funext i
simp [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ← h ⟨i⟩]
fac _ _ := rfl
/-- The product is homeomorphic to the product of the underlying spaces,
equipped with the product topology.
-/
def piIsoPi {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : ∏ᶜ α ≅ TopCat.of (∀ i, α i) :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (piFanIsLimit.{v, u} α)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem piIsoPi_inv_π {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) :
(piIsoPi α).inv ≫ Pi.π α i = piπ α i := by simp [piIsoPi]
theorem piIsoPi_inv_π_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
(Pi.π α i :) ((piIsoPi α).inv x) = x i :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (piIsoPi_inv_π α i) x
theorem piIsoPi_hom_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι)
(x : (∏ᶜ α : TopCat.{max v u})) : (piIsoPi α).hom x i = (Pi.π α i :) x := by
have := piIsoPi_inv_π α i
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq] at this
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom this x
/-- The inclusion to the coproduct as a bundled continuous map. -/
abbrev sigmaι {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) : α i ⟶ TopCat.of (Σi, α i) := by
refine ofHom (ContinuousMap.mk ?_ ?_)
· dsimp
apply Sigma.mk i
· dsimp; continuity
/-- The explicit cofan of a family of topological spaces given by the sigma type. -/
@[simps! pt ι_app]
def sigmaCofan {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : Cofan α :=
Cofan.mk (TopCat.of (Σi, α i)) (sigmaι α)
/-- The constructed cofan is indeed a colimit -/
def sigmaCofanIsColimit {ι : Type v} (β : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : IsColimit (sigmaCofan β) where
desc S := ofHom
{ toFun := fun (s : of (Σ i, β i)) => S.ι.app ⟨s.1⟩ s.2
continuous_toFun := by continuity }
uniq := by
intro S m h
ext ⟨i, x⟩
simp only [← h]
congr
fac s j := by
cases j
aesop_cat
/-- The coproduct is homeomorphic to the disjoint union of the topological spaces.
-/
def sigmaIsoSigma {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : ∐ α ≅ TopCat.of (Σi, α i) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).coconePointUniqueUpToIso (sigmaCofanIsColimit.{v, u} α)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) :
Sigma.ι α i ≫ (sigmaIsoSigma α).hom = sigmaι α i := by simp [sigmaIsoSigma]
theorem sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : α i) :
(sigmaIsoSigma α).hom ((Sigma.ι α i :) x) = Sigma.mk i x :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι α i) x
theorem sigmaIsoSigma_inv_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : α i) :
(sigmaIsoSigma α).inv ⟨i, x⟩ = (Sigma.ι α i :) x := by
rw [← sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply, ← comp_app, ← comp_app, Iso.hom_inv_id,
Category.comp_id]
section Prod
/-- The first projection from the product. -/
abbrev prodFst {X Y : TopCat.{u}} : TopCat.of (X × Y) ⟶ X :=
ofHom { toFun := Prod.fst }
/-- The second projection from the product. -/
abbrev prodSnd {X Y : TopCat.{u}} : TopCat.of (X × Y) ⟶ Y :=
ofHom { toFun := Prod.snd }
/-- The explicit binary cofan of `X, Y` given by `X × Y`. -/
def prodBinaryFan (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : BinaryFan X Y :=
BinaryFan.mk prodFst prodSnd
/-- The constructed binary fan is indeed a limit -/
def prodBinaryFanIsLimit (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : IsLimit (prodBinaryFan X Y) where
lift := fun S : BinaryFan X Y => ofHom {
toFun := fun s => (S.fst s, S.snd s)
continuous_toFun := by continuity }
fac := by
rintro S (_ | _) <;> {dsimp; ext; rfl}
uniq := by
intro S m h
ext x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): used to be part of `ext x`
refine Prod.ext ?_ ?_
· specialize h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
apply_fun fun e => e x at h
exact h
· specialize h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
apply_fun fun e => e x at h
exact h
/-- The homeomorphism between `X ⨯ Y` and the set-theoretic product of `X` and `Y`,
equipped with the product topology.
-/
def prodIsoProd (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : X ⨯ Y ≅ TopCat.of (X × Y) :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (prodBinaryFanIsLimit X Y)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prodIsoProd_hom_fst (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).hom ≫ prodFst = Limits.prod.fst := by
simp [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, prodIsoProd]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prodIsoProd_hom_snd (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).hom ≫ prodSnd = Limits.prod.snd := by
simp [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, prodIsoProd]
rfl
-- Note that `(x : X ⨯ Y)` would mean `(x : ↑X × ↑Y)` below:
theorem prodIsoProd_hom_apply {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (x : ↑(X ⨯ Y)) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).hom x = ((Limits.prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) x,
(Limits.prod.snd : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) x) := by
ext
· exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (prodIsoProd_hom_fst X Y) x
· exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (prodIsoProd_hom_snd X Y) x
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise]
theorem prodIsoProd_inv_fst (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).inv ≫ Limits.prod.fst = prodFst := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise]
theorem prodIsoProd_inv_snd (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).inv ≫ Limits.prod.snd = prodSnd := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
theorem prod_topology {X Y : TopCat.{u}} :
(X ⨯ Y).str =
induced (Limits.prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) X.str ⊓
induced (Limits.prod.snd : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (prodIsoProd X Y)
refine homeo.isInducing.eq_induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (_ ⊓ _) = _
simp [induced_compose]
rfl
theorem range_prod_map {W X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (Limits.prod.map f g) =
(Limits.prod.fst : Y ⨯ Z ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range f ∩
(Limits.prod.snd : Y ⨯ Z ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range g := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp_rw [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply,
Limits.prod.map_fst, Limits.prod.map_snd, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, exists_apply_eq_apply,
and_self_iff]
· rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
use (prodIsoProd W X).inv (x₁, x₂)
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
erw [Limits.prod.map_fst]
rw [ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, TopCat.prodIsoProd_inv_fst_apply]
exact hx₁
· rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
erw [Limits.prod.map_snd]
rw [ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, TopCat.prodIsoProd_inv_snd_apply]
exact hx₂
theorem isInducing_prodMap {W X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} {f : W ⟶ X} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (hf : IsInducing f)
(hg : IsInducing g) : IsInducing (Limits.prod.map f g) := by
constructor
simp_rw [prod_topology, induced_inf, induced_compose, ← coe_comp,
prod.map_fst, prod.map_snd, coe_comp, ← induced_compose (g := f), ← induced_compose (g := g)]
rw [← hf.eq_induced, ← hg.eq_induced]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_prod_map := isInducing_prodMap
theorem isEmbedding_prodMap {W X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} {f : W ⟶ X} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (hf : IsEmbedding f)
(hg : IsEmbedding g) : IsEmbedding (Limits.prod.map f g) :=
⟨isInducing_prodMap hf.isInducing hg.isInducing, by
haveI := (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mpr hf.injective
haveI := (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mpr hg.injective
exact (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_prod_map := isEmbedding_prodMap
end Prod
/-- The binary coproduct cofan in `TopCat`. -/
protected def binaryCofan (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : BinaryCofan X Y :=
BinaryCofan.mk (ofHom ⟨Sum.inl, by continuity⟩) (ofHom ⟨Sum.inr, by continuity⟩)
|
/-- The constructed binary coproduct cofan in `TopCat` is the coproduct. -/
def binaryCofanIsColimit (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : IsColimit (TopCat.binaryCofan X Y) := by
refine Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => ofHom
{ toFun := Sum.elim s.inl s.inr, continuous_toFun := ?_ }) ?_ ?_ ?_
· continuity
· intro s
ext
rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Products.lean | 237 | 245 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.RiemannZeta
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.GammaDeriv
/-!
# Asymptotics of `ζ s` as `s → 1`
The goal of this file is to evaluate the limit of `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)` as `s → 1`.
### Main results
* `tendsto_riemannZeta_sub_one_div`: the limit of `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)`, at the filter of punctured
neighbourhoods of 1 in `ℂ`, exists and is equal to the Euler-Mascheroni constant `γ`.
* `riemannZeta_one_ne_zero`: with our definition of `ζ 1` (which is characterised as the limit of
`ζ s - 1 / (s - 1) / Gammaℝ s` as `s → 1`), we have `ζ 1 ≠ 0`.
### Outline of arguments
We consider the sum `F s = ∑' n : ℕ, f (n + 1) s`, where `s` is a real variable and
`f n s = ∫ x in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1)`. We show that `F s` is continuous on `[1, ∞)`,
that `F 1 = 1 - γ`, and that `F s = 1 / (s - 1) - ζ s / s` for `1 < s`.
By combining these formulae, one deduces that the limit of `ζ s - 1 / (s - 1)` at `𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ)`
exists and is equal to `γ`. Finally, using this and the Riemann removable singularity criterion
we obtain the limit along punctured neighbourhoods of 1 in `ℂ`.
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Topology
@[inherit_doc] local notation "γ" => eulerMascheroniConstant
namespace ZetaAsymptotics
-- since the intermediate lemmas are of little interest in themselves we put them in a namespace
/-!
## Definitions
-/
/-- Auxiliary function used in studying zeta-function asymptotics. -/
noncomputable def term (n : ℕ) (s : ℝ) : ℝ := ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1)
/-- Sum of finitely many `term`s. -/
noncomputable def term_sum (s : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : ℝ := ∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, term (n + 1) s
/-- Topological sum of `term`s. -/
noncomputable def term_tsum (s : ℝ) : ℝ := ∑' n, term (n + 1) s
lemma term_nonneg (n : ℕ) (s : ℝ) : 0 ≤ term n s := by
rw [term, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by simp)]
refine setIntegral_nonneg measurableSet_Ioc (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
refine div_nonneg ?_ (rpow_nonneg ?_ _)
all_goals linarith [hx.1]
lemma term_welldef {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1)) volume n (n + 1) := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le (by linarith)]
refine (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx ↦ ContinuousAt.div ?_ ?_ ?_).integrableOn_Icc
· fun_prop
· apply continuousAt_id.rpow_const (Or.inr <| by linarith)
· exact (rpow_pos_of_pos ((Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn).trans_le hx.1) _).ne'
section s_eq_one
/-!
## Evaluation of the sum for `s = 1`
-/
lemma term_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
term n 1 = (log (n + 1) - log n) - 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hv : ∀ x ∈ uIcc (n : ℝ) (n + 1), 0 < x := by
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one])] at hx
exact (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn).trans_le hx.1
calc term n 1
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [term, one_add_one_eq_two, ← Nat.cast_two (R := ℝ), rpow_natCast]
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (1 / x - n / x ^ 2) := by
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
field_simp [(hv x hx).ne']
ring
_ = (∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), 1 / x) - n * ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), 1 / x ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [← mul_one_div (n : ℝ)]
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_sub]
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
· exact intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_one_div (fun x hx ↦ (hv x hx).ne') (by fun_prop)
· exact (intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_one_div
(fun x hx ↦ (sq_pos_of_pos (hv x hx)).ne') (by fun_prop)).const_mul _
_ = (log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n) - n * ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), 1 / x ^ 2 := by
congr 1
rw [integral_one_div_of_pos, log_div]
all_goals positivity
_ = (log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n) - n * ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), x ^ (-2 : ℝ) := by
congr 2
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [rpow_neg, one_div, ← Nat.cast_two (R := ℝ), rpow_natCast]
exact (hv x hx).le
_ = log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n - n * (1 / n - 1 / (n + 1)) := by
rw [integral_rpow]
· simp_rw [sub_div, (by norm_num : (-2 : ℝ) + 1 = -1), div_neg, div_one, neg_sub_neg,
rpow_neg_one, ← one_div]
· refine Or.inr ⟨by norm_num, not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ?_ ?_⟩
all_goals positivity
_ = log (↑n + 1) - log ↑n - 1 / (↑n + 1) := by
congr 1
field_simp
lemma term_sum_one (N : ℕ) : term_sum 1 N = log (N + 1) - harmonic (N + 1) + 1 := by
induction N with
| zero =>
simp_rw [term_sum, Finset.sum_range_zero, harmonic_succ, harmonic_zero,
Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.cast_one, inv_one, Rat.cast_one, log_one, sub_add_cancel]
| succ N hN =>
unfold term_sum at hN ⊢
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hN, harmonic_succ (N + 1),
term_one (by positivity : 0 < N + 1)]
push_cast
ring_nf
/-- The topological sum of `ZetaAsymptotics.term (n + 1) 1` over all `n : ℕ` is `1 - γ`. This is
proved by directly evaluating the sum of the first `N` terms and using the limit definition of `γ`.
-/
lemma term_tsum_one : HasSum (fun n ↦ term (n + 1) 1) (1 - γ) := by
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (fun n ↦ term_nonneg (n + 1) 1)]
show Tendsto (fun N ↦ term_sum 1 N) atTop _
simp_rw [term_sum_one, sub_eq_neg_add]
refine Tendsto.add ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
have := (tendsto_eulerMascheroniSeq'.comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1)).neg
refine this.congr' (Eventually.of_forall (fun n ↦ ?_))
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, eulerMascheroniSeq', reduceCtorEq, if_false]
push_cast
abel
end s_eq_one
section s_gt_one
/-!
## Evaluation of the sum for `1 < s`
-/
lemma term_of_lt {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
term n s = 1 / (s - 1) * (1 / n ^ (s - 1) - 1 / (n + 1) ^ (s - 1))
- n / s * (1 / n ^ s - 1 / (n + 1) ^ s) := by
have hv : ∀ x ∈ uIcc (n : ℝ) (n + 1), 0 < x := by
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, zero_le_one])] at hx
exact (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn).trans_le hx.1
calc term n s
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x - n) / x ^ (s + 1) := by rfl
_ = ∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), (x ^ (-s) - n * x ^ (-(s + 1))) := by
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [sub_div, rpow_add_one (hv x hx).ne', mul_comm, ← div_div, div_self (hv x hx).ne',
rpow_neg (hv x hx).le, rpow_neg (hv x hx).le, one_div, rpow_add_one (hv x hx).ne', mul_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv]
_ = (∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), x ^ (-s)) - n * (∫ x : ℝ in n..(n + 1), x ^ (-(s + 1))) := by
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_sub, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul] <;>
[skip; apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul] <;>
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow (Or.inr <| not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ?_ ?_)
· exact_mod_cast hn
· linarith
_ = 1 / (s - 1) * (1 / n ^ (s - 1) - 1 / (n + 1) ^ (s - 1))
- n / s * (1 / n ^ s - 1 / (n + 1) ^ s) := by
have : 0 ∉ uIcc (n : ℝ) (n + 1) := (lt_irrefl _ <| hv _ ·)
rw [integral_rpow (Or.inr ⟨by linarith, this⟩), integral_rpow (Or.inr ⟨by linarith, this⟩)]
congr 1
· rw [show -s + 1 = -(s - 1) by ring, div_neg, ← neg_div, mul_comm, mul_one_div, neg_sub,
rpow_neg (Nat.cast_nonneg _), one_div, rpow_neg (by linarith), one_div]
· rw [show -(s + 1) + 1 = -s by ring, div_neg, ← neg_div, neg_sub, div_mul_eq_mul_div,
mul_div_assoc, rpow_neg (Nat.cast_nonneg _), one_div, rpow_neg (by linarith), one_div]
lemma term_sum_of_lt (N : ℕ) {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
term_sum s N = 1 / (s - 1) * (1 - 1 / (N + 1) ^ (s - 1))
- 1 / s * ((∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) - N / (N + 1) ^ s) := by
simp only [term_sum]
conv => enter [1, 2, n]; rw [term_of_lt (by simp) hs]
rw [Finset.sum_sub_distrib]
congr 1
· induction N with
| zero => simp
| succ N hN =>
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hN, Nat.cast_add_one]
ring_nf
· simp_rw [mul_comm (_ / _), ← mul_div_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv _ s, ← Finset.sum_mul, mul_one]
congr 1
induction N with
| zero => simp
| succ N hN =>
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hN, Nat.cast_add_one, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc]
congr 1
ring_nf
/-- For `1 < s`, the topological sum of `ZetaAsymptotics.term (n + 1) s` over all `n : ℕ` is
`1 / (s - 1) - ζ s / s`.
-/
lemma term_tsum_of_lt {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
term_tsum s = (1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s * ∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
rw [hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (fun n ↦ term_nonneg (n + 1) s)]
change Tendsto (fun N ↦ term_sum s N) atTop _
simp_rw [term_sum_of_lt _ hs]
apply Tendsto.sub
· rw [show 𝓝 (1 / (s - 1)) = 𝓝 (1 / (s - 1) - 1 / (s - 1) * 0) by simp]
simp_rw [mul_sub, mul_one]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.sub (Tendsto.const_mul _ ?_)
refine tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop <| (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith)).comp ?_
exact tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
· rw [← sub_zero (tsum _)]
apply (((Summable.hasSum ?_).tendsto_sum_nat).sub ?_).const_mul
· exact_mod_cast (summable_nat_add_iff 1).mpr (summable_one_div_nat_rpow.mpr hs)
· apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
· change Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (1 / ↑(n + 1) : ℝ) ^ (s - 1)) ..
rw [show 𝓝 (0 : ℝ) = 𝓝 (0 ^ (s - 1)) by rw [zero_rpow]; linarith]
refine Tendsto.rpow_const ?_ (Or.inr <| by linarith)
exact (tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat _).comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat _)
· intro n
positivity
· intro n
dsimp only
transitivity (n + 1) / (n + 1) ^ s
· gcongr
linarith
· apply le_of_eq
rw [rpow_sub_one, ← div_mul, div_one, mul_comm, one_div, inv_rpow, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
· norm_cast
all_goals positivity
/-- Reformulation of `ZetaAsymptotics.term_tsum_of_lt` which is useful for some computations
below. -/
lemma zeta_limit_aux1 {s : ℝ} (hs : 1 < s) :
(∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) - 1 / (s - 1) = 1 - s * term_tsum s := by
rw [term_tsum_of_lt hs]
generalize (∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) ^ s) = Z
field_simp [(show s - 1 ≠ 0 by linarith)]
ring_nf
end s_gt_one
section continuity
/-!
## Continuity of the sum
-/
lemma continuousOn_term (n : ℕ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ term (n + 1) x) (Ici 1) := by
-- TODO: can this be shortened using the lemma
-- `continuous_parametric_intervalIntegral_of_continuous'` from https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11185?
simp only [term, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by linarith : (↑(n + 1) : ℝ) ≤ ↑(n + 1) + 1)]
apply continuousOn_of_dominated (bound := fun x ↦ (x - ↑(n + 1)) / x ^ (2 : ℝ))
· exact fun s hs ↦ (term_welldef (by simp) (zero_lt_one.trans_le hs)).1.1
· intro s (hs : 1 ≤ s)
rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioc]
filter_upwards with x hx
have : 0 < x := lt_trans (by positivity) hx.1
rw [norm_of_nonneg (div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr hx.1.le) (by positivity)), Nat.cast_add_one]
apply div_le_div_of_nonneg_left
· exact_mod_cast sub_nonneg.mpr hx.1.le
· positivity
· exact rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (le_trans (by simp) hx.1.le) (by linarith)
· rw [← IntegrableOn, ← intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (by linarith)]
exact_mod_cast term_welldef (by omega : 0 < (n + 1)) zero_lt_one
· rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioc]
filter_upwards with x hx
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun s (hs : 1 ≤ s) ↦ continuousAt_const.div ?_ ?_)
| · exact continuousAt_const.rpow (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) (Or.inr (by linarith))
· exact (rpow_pos_of_pos ((Nat.cast_pos.mpr (by simp)).trans hx.1) _).ne'
lemma continuousOn_term_tsum : ContinuousOn term_tsum (Ici 1) := by
-- We use dominated convergence, using `fun n ↦ term n 1` as our uniform bound (since `term` is
-- monotone decreasing in `s`.)
refine continuousOn_tsum (fun i ↦ continuousOn_term _) term_tsum_one.summable (fun n s hs ↦ ?_)
rw [term, term, norm_of_nonneg]
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by linarith : (↑(n + 1) : ℝ) ≤ ↑(n + 1) + 1)]
refine setIntegral_mono_on ?_ ?_ measurableSet_Ioc (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
· exact (term_welldef n.succ_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le hs)).1
· exact (term_welldef n.succ_pos zero_lt_one).1
· rw [div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left] -- leave side-goals to end and kill them all together
· apply rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
· exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (by simp) hx.1).le
· linarith [mem_Ici.mp hs]
· linarith [hx.1]
all_goals apply rpow_pos_of_pos ((Nat.cast_nonneg _).trans_lt hx.1)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Harmonic/ZetaAsymp.lean | 269 | 286 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Bounds
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
/-!
# The real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring, and a conditionally complete linear order.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Pointwise CauSeq
namespace Real
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ} {a : ℝ}
instance instArchimedean : Archimedean ℝ :=
archimedean_iff_rat_le.2 fun x =>
Real.ind_mk x fun f =>
let ⟨M, _, H⟩ := f.bounded' 0
⟨M, mk_le_of_forall_le ⟨0, fun i _ => Rat.cast_le.2 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H i)).2⟩⟩
noncomputable instance : FloorRing ℝ :=
Archimedean.floorRing _
theorem isCauSeq_iff_lift {f : ℕ → ℚ} : IsCauSeq abs f ↔ IsCauSeq abs fun i => (f i : ℝ) where
mp H ε ε0 :=
let ⟨δ, δ0, δε⟩ := exists_pos_rat_lt ε0
(H _ δ0).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp; exact lt_trans (mod_cast hi _ ij) δε
mpr H ε ε0 :=
(H _ (Rat.cast_pos.2 ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp at hi; exact mod_cast hi _ ij
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → ℚ) (x : ℝ) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| < ε) :
∃ h', Real.mk ⟨f, h'⟩ = x :=
⟨isCauSeq_iff_lift.2 (CauSeq.of_near _ (const abs x) h),
sub_eq_zero.1 <|
abs_eq_zero.1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abs_nonneg _)) fun _ε ε0 =>
mk_near_of_forall_near <| (h _ ε0).imp fun _i h j ij => le_of_lt (h j ij)⟩
theorem exists_floor (x : ℝ) : ∃ ub : ℤ, (ub : ℝ) ≤ x ∧ ∀ z : ℤ, (z : ℝ) ≤ x → z ≤ ub :=
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_gt x
⟨n, fun _ h' => Int.cast_le.1 <| le_trans h' <| le_of_lt hn⟩)
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_lt x
⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩)
theorem exists_isLUB (hne : s.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddAbove s) : ∃ x, IsLUB s x := by
rcases hne, hbdd with ⟨⟨L, hL⟩, ⟨U, hU⟩⟩
have : ∀ d : ℕ, BddAbove { m : ℤ | ∃ y ∈ s, (m : ℝ) ≤ y * d } := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_int_gt U
refine fun d => ⟨k * d, fun z h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine Int.cast_le.1 (hy.trans ?_)
push_cast
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((hU yS).trans hk.le) d.cast_nonneg
choose f hf using fun d : ℕ =>
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd (this d) ⟨⌊L * d⌋, L, hL, Int.floor_le _⟩
have hf₁ : ∀ n > 0, ∃ y ∈ s, ((f n / n : ℚ) : ℝ) ≤ y := fun n n0 =>
let ⟨y, yS, hy⟩ := (hf n).1
⟨y, yS, by simpa using (div_le_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _)).2 hy⟩
have hf₂ : ∀ n > 0, ∀ y ∈ s, (y - ((n : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) < (f n / n : ℚ) := by
intro n n0 y yS
have := (Int.sub_one_lt_floor _).trans_le (Int.cast_le.2 <| (hf n).2 _ ⟨y, yS, Int.floor_le _⟩)
simp only [Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_intCast, Rat.cast_natCast, gt_iff_lt]
rwa [lt_div_iff₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _), sub_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀]
exact ne_of_gt (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0)
have hg : IsCauSeq abs (fun n => f n / n : ℕ → ℚ) := by
intro ε ε0
suffices ∀ j ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, ∀ k ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, (f j / j - f k / k : ℚ) < ε by
refine ⟨_, fun j ij => abs_lt.2 ⟨?_, this _ ij _ le_rfl⟩⟩
rw [neg_lt, neg_sub]
exact this _ le_rfl _ ij
intro j ij k ik
replace ij := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ij)
replace ik := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ik)
have j0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ij)
have k0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ik)
rcases hf₁ _ j0 with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((Rat.cast_lt (K := ℝ)).1 ?_) ((inv_le_comm₀ ε0 (Nat.cast_pos.2 k0)).1 ik)
simpa using sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt hy <| sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1 <| hf₂ _ k0 _ yS)
let g : CauSeq ℚ abs := ⟨fun n => f n / n, hg⟩
refine ⟨mk g, ⟨fun x xS => ?_, fun y h => ?_⟩⟩
· refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun z xz => ?_
obtain ⟨K, hK⟩ := exists_nat_gt (x - z)⁻¹
refine le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨K, fun n nK => ?_⟩
replace xz := sub_pos.2 xz
replace hK := hK.le.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 nK)
have n0 : 0 < n := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 xz).trans_le hK)
refine le_trans ?_ (hf₂ _ n0 _ xS).le
rwa [le_sub_comm, inv_le_comm₀ (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _) xz]
· exact
mk_le_of_forall_le
⟨1, fun n n1 =>
let ⟨x, xS, hx⟩ := hf₁ _ n1
le_trans hx (h xS)⟩
/-- A nonempty, bounded below set of real numbers has a greatest lower bound. -/
theorem exists_isGLB (hne : s.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddBelow s) : ∃ x, IsGLB s x := by
have hne' : (-s).Nonempty := Set.nonempty_neg.mpr hne
have hbdd' : BddAbove (-s) := bddAbove_neg.mpr hbdd
use -Classical.choose (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
| rw [← isLUB_neg]
exact Classical.choose_spec (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℝ :=
⟨fun s => if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean | 110 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Defs
/-!
# The rational numbers are a commutative ring
This file contains the commutative ring instance on the rational numbers.
See note [foundational algebra order theory].
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid Field PNat Nat.gcd_greatest IsDomain.toCancelMonoidWithZero
namespace Rat
/-! ### Instances -/
instance commRing : CommRing ℚ where
__ := addCommGroup
__ := commMonoid
zero_mul := Rat.zero_mul
mul_zero := Rat.mul_zero
left_distrib := Rat.mul_add
right_distrib := Rat.add_mul
intCast := fun n => n
natCast n := Int.cast n
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ n := by
simp only [intCast_eq_divInt, divInt_add_divInt _ _ Int.one_ne_zero Int.one_ne_zero,
← divInt_one_one, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_one, mul_one]
instance commGroupWithZero : CommGroupWithZero ℚ :=
{ exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, Rat.zero_ne_one⟩
inv_zero := by
change Rat.inv 0 = 0
rw [Rat.inv_def]
rfl
mul_inv_cancel := Rat.mul_inv_cancel
mul_zero := mul_zero
zero_mul := zero_mul }
instance isDomain : IsDomain ℚ := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
/-- The characteristic of `ℚ` is 0. -/
@[stacks 09FS "Second part."]
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℚ where cast_injective a b hab := by simpa using congr_arg num hab
/-!
### Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution
These also prevent non-computable instances being used to construct these instances non-computably.
-/
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring ℚ := by infer_instance
instance semiring : Semiring ℚ := by infer_instance
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
lemma mkRat_eq_div (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ) : mkRat n d = n / d := by
simp only [mkRat_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_div, Int.cast_natCast]
lemma divInt_div_divInt_cancel_left {x : ℤ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (n d : ℤ) :
n /. x / (d /. x) = n /. d := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_divInt', divInt_mul_divInt_cancel hx]
lemma divInt_div_divInt_cancel_right {x : ℤ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (n d : ℤ) :
x /. n / (x /. d) = d /. n := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_divInt', mul_comm, divInt_mul_divInt_cancel hx]
|
lemma num_div_den (r : ℚ) : (r.num : ℚ) / (r.den : ℚ) = r := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ← divInt_eq_div, num_divInt_den]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Rat.lean | 76 | 78 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov, Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2
/-!
# Simple graphs
This module defines simple graphs on a vertex type `V` as an irreflexive symmetric relation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph` is a structure for symmetric, irreflexive relations.
* `SimpleGraph.neighborSet` is the `Set` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex.
* `SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors` is the intersection of the neighbor sets of two given vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceSet` is the `Set` of edges containing a given vertex.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` instance: Under the subgraph relation, `SimpleGraph` forms a
`CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`. In other words, this is the complete lattice of spanning subgraphs
of the complete graph.
## TODO
* This is the simplest notion of an unoriented graph.
This should eventually fit into a more complete combinatorics hierarchy which includes
multigraphs and directed graphs.
We begin with simple graphs in order to start learning what the combinatorics hierarchy should
look like.
-/
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Symmetric
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Irreflexive
/--
A variant of the `aesop` tactic for use in the graph library. Changes relative
to standard `aesop`:
- We use the `SimpleGraph` rule set in addition to the default rule sets.
- We instruct Aesop's `intro` rule to unfold with `default` transparency.
- We instruct Aesop to fail if it can't fully solve the goal. This allows us to
use `aesop_graph` for auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph) "aesop_graph" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
Use `aesop_graph?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_graph`
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph?) "aesop_graph?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop? $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_graph` which does not fail if it is unable to solve the goal.
Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal Aesop is even worse than nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph_nonterminal) "aesop_graph_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
open Finset Function
universe u v w
/-- A simple graph is an irreflexive symmetric relation `Adj` on a vertex type `V`.
The relation describes which pairs of vertices are adjacent.
There is exactly one edge for every pair of adjacent vertices;
see `SimpleGraph.edgeSet` for the corresponding edge set.
-/
@[ext, aesop safe constructors (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])]
structure SimpleGraph (V : Type u) where
/-- The adjacency relation of a simple graph. -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph
loopless : Irreflexive Adj := by aesop_graph
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph (Adj → adj)
/-- Constructor for simple graphs using a symmetric irreflexive boolean function. -/
@[simps]
def SimpleGraph.mk' {V : Type u} :
{adj : V → V → Bool // (∀ x y, adj x y = adj y x) ∧ (∀ x, ¬ adj x x)} ↪ SimpleGraph V where
toFun x := ⟨fun v w ↦ x.1 v w, fun v w ↦ by simp [x.2.1], fun v ↦ by simp [x.2.2]⟩
inj' := by
rintro ⟨adj, _⟩ ⟨adj', _⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
intro h
funext v w
simpa [Bool.coe_iff_coe] using congr_fun₂ h v w
/-- We can enumerate simple graphs by enumerating all functions `V → V → Bool`
and filtering on whether they are symmetric and irreflexive. -/
instance {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (SimpleGraph V) where
elems := Finset.univ.map SimpleGraph.mk'
complete := by
classical
rintro ⟨Adj, hs, hi⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_univ, true_and, Subtype.exists, Bool.not_eq_true]
refine ⟨fun v w ↦ Adj v w, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp [hs.iff]
· intro v; simp [hi v]
· ext
simp
/-- There are finitely many simple graphs on a given finite type. -/
instance SimpleGraph.instFinite {V : Type u} [Finite V] : Finite (SimpleGraph V) :=
.of_injective SimpleGraph.Adj fun _ _ ↦ SimpleGraph.ext
/-- Construct the simple graph induced by the given relation. It
symmetrizes the relation and makes it irreflexive. -/
def SimpleGraph.fromRel {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj a b := a ≠ b ∧ (r a b ∨ r b a)
symm := fun _ _ ⟨hn, hr⟩ => ⟨hn.symm, hr.symm⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn rfl
@[simp]
theorem SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) (v w : V) :
(SimpleGraph.fromRel r).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ (r v w ∨ r w v) :=
Iff.rfl
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.symm
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.irrefl
/-- The complete graph on a type `V` is the simple graph with all pairs of distinct vertices
adjacent. In `Mathlib`, this is usually referred to as `⊤`. -/
def completeGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj := Ne
/-- The graph with no edges on a given vertex type `V`. `Mathlib` prefers the notation `⊥`. -/
def emptyGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj _ _ := False
/-- Two vertices are adjacent in the complete bipartite graph on two vertex types
if and only if they are not from the same side.
Any bipartite graph may be regarded as a subgraph of one of these. -/
@[simps]
def completeBipartiteGraph (V W : Type*) : SimpleGraph (V ⊕ W) where
Adj v w := v.isLeft ∧ w.isRight ∨ v.isRight ∧ w.isLeft
symm v w := by cases v <;> cases w <;> simp
loopless v := by cases v <;> simp
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {a b c u v w : V} {e : Sym2 V}
@[simp]
protected theorem irrefl {v : V} : ¬G.Adj v v :=
G.loopless v
theorem adj_comm (u v : V) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj v u :=
⟨fun x => G.symm x, fun x => G.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
theorem Adj.symm {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
theorem ne_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b := by
rintro rfl
exact G.irrefl h
protected theorem Adj.ne {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b :=
G.ne_of_adj h
protected theorem Adj.ne' {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : b ≠ a :=
h.ne.symm
theorem ne_of_adj_of_not_adj {v w x : V} (h : G.Adj v x) (hn : ¬G.Adj w x) : v ≠ w := fun h' =>
hn (h' ▸ h)
theorem adj_injective : Injective (Adj : SimpleGraph V → V → V → Prop) :=
| fun _ _ => SimpleGraph.ext
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Basic.lean | 188 | 190 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Fintype instances for pi types
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedRing MonoidWithZero
open Finset Function
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Fintype
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {γ δ : α → Type*} {s : ∀ a, Finset (γ a)}
/-- Given for all `a : α` a finset `t a` of `δ a`, then one can define the
finset `Fintype.piFinset t` of all functions taking values in `t a` for all `a`. This is the
analogue of `Finset.pi` where the base finset is `univ` (but formally they are not the same, as
there is an additional condition `i ∈ Finset.univ` in the `Finset.pi` definition). -/
def piFinset (t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) : Finset (∀ a, δ a) :=
(Finset.univ.pi t).map ⟨fun f a => f a (mem_univ a), fun _ _ =>
by simp +contextual [funext_iff]⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_piFinset {t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)} {f : ∀ a, δ a} : f ∈ piFinset t ↔ ∀ a, f a ∈ t a := by
constructor
· simp only [piFinset, mem_map, and_imp, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, exists_imp,
mem_pi]
rintro g hg hgf a
rw [← hgf]
exact hg a
· simp only [piFinset, mem_map, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, mem_pi]
exact fun hf => ⟨fun a _ => f a, hf, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_piFinset (t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) :
(piFinset t : Set (∀ a, δ a)) = Set.pi Set.univ fun a => t a :=
Set.ext fun x => by
rw [Set.mem_univ_pi]
exact Fintype.mem_piFinset
theorem piFinset_subset (t₁ t₂ : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) (h : ∀ a, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) :
piFinset t₁ ⊆ piFinset t₂ := fun _ hg => mem_piFinset.2 fun a => h a <| mem_piFinset.1 hg a
@[simp]
theorem piFinset_eq_empty : piFinset s = ∅ ↔ ∃ i, s i = ∅ := by simp [piFinset]
@[simp]
theorem piFinset_empty [Nonempty α] : piFinset (fun _ => ∅ : ∀ i, Finset (δ i)) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
lemma piFinset_nonempty : (piFinset s).Nonempty ↔ ∀ a, (s a).Nonempty := by simp [piFinset]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.piFinset_nonempty_of_forall_nonempty⟩ := piFinset_nonempty
lemma _root_.Finset.Nonempty.piFinset_const {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset β}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : (piFinset fun _ : ι ↦ s).Nonempty := piFinset_nonempty.2 fun _ ↦ hs
@[simp]
lemma piFinset_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : ∀ a, Finset (γ a)) : piFinset s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ by simp
@[simp]
theorem piFinset_singleton (f : ∀ i, δ i) : piFinset (fun i => {f i} : ∀ i, Finset (δ i)) = {f} :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [funext_iff, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_singleton]
theorem piFinset_subsingleton {f : ∀ i, Finset (δ i)} (hf : ∀ i, (f i : Set (δ i)).Subsingleton) :
(Fintype.piFinset f : Set (∀ i, δ i)).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb =>
funext fun _ => hf _ (mem_piFinset.1 ha _) (mem_piFinset.1 hb _)
theorem piFinset_disjoint_of_disjoint (t₁ t₂ : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) {a : α}
(h : Disjoint (t₁ a) (t₂ a)) : Disjoint (piFinset t₁) (piFinset t₂) :=
disjoint_iff_ne.2 fun f₁ hf₁ f₂ hf₂ eq₁₂ =>
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h (f₁ a) (mem_piFinset.1 hf₁ a) (f₂ a) (mem_piFinset.1 hf₂ a)
(congr_fun eq₁₂ a)
lemma piFinset_image [∀ a, DecidableEq (δ a)] (f : ∀ a, γ a → δ a) (s : ∀ a, Finset (γ a)) :
| piFinset (fun a ↦ (s a).image (f a)) = (piFinset s).image fun b a ↦ f _ (b a) := by
ext; simp only [mem_piFinset, mem_image, Classical.skolem, forall_and, funext_iff]
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Pi.lean | 87 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Satisfiability
/-!
# Type Spaces
This file defines the space of complete types over a first-order theory.
(Note that types in model theory are different from types in type theory.)
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType`:
`T.CompleteType α` consists of complete types over the theory `T` with variables `α`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.typeOf` is the type of a given tuple.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.realizedTypes`: `T.realizedTypes M α` is the set of
types in `T.CompleteType α` that are realized in `M` - that is, the type of some tuple in `M`.
## Main Results
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.nonempty_iff`:
The space `T.CompleteType α` is nonempty exactly when `T` is satisfiable.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.exists_modelType_is_realized_in`: Every type is realized
in some model.
## Implementation Notes
- Complete types are implemented as maximal consistent theories in an expanded language.
More frequently they are described as maximal consistent sets of formulas, but this is equivalent.
## TODO
- Connect `T.CompleteType α` to sets of formulas `L.Formula α`.
-/
universe u v w w'
open Cardinal Set FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
namespace Theory
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} (T : L.Theory) (α : Type w)
/-- A complete type over a given theory in a certain type of variables is a maximally
consistent (with the theory) set of formulas in that type. -/
structure CompleteType where
/-- The underlying theory -/
toTheory : L[[α]].Theory
subset' : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊆ toTheory
isMaximal' : toTheory.IsMaximal
variable {T α}
namespace CompleteType
attribute [coe] CompleteType.toTheory
instance Sentence.instSetLike : SetLike (T.CompleteType α) (L[[α]].Sentence) :=
⟨fun p => p.toTheory, fun p q h => by
cases p
cases q
congr ⟩
theorem isMaximal (p : T.CompleteType α) : IsMaximal (p : L[[α]].Theory) :=
p.isMaximal'
theorem subset (p : T.CompleteType α) : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊆ (p : L[[α]].Theory) :=
p.subset'
theorem mem_or_not_mem (p : T.CompleteType α) (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) : φ ∈ p ∨ φ.not ∈ p :=
p.isMaximal.mem_or_not_mem φ
theorem mem_of_models (p : T.CompleteType α) {φ : L[[α]].Sentence}
(h : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊨ᵇ φ) : φ ∈ p :=
(p.mem_or_not_mem φ).resolve_right fun con =>
((models_iff_not_satisfiable _).1 h)
(p.isMaximal.1.mono (union_subset p.subset (singleton_subset_iff.2 con)))
theorem not_mem_iff (p : T.CompleteType α) (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) : φ.not ∈ p ↔ ¬φ ∈ p :=
⟨fun hf ht => by
have h : ¬IsSatisfiable ({φ, φ.not} : L[[α]].Theory) := by
rintro ⟨@⟨_, _, h, _⟩⟩
simp only [model_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, forall_eq] at h
exact h.2 h.1
refine h (p.isMaximal.1.mono ?_)
rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨ht, hf⟩, (p.mem_or_not_mem φ).resolve_left⟩
| @[simp]
theorem compl_setOf_mem {φ : L[[α]].Sentence} :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | φ ∈ p }ᶜ = { p : T.CompleteType α | φ.not ∈ p } :=
ext fun _ => (not_mem_iff _ _).symm
theorem setOf_subset_eq_empty_iff (S : L[[α]].Theory) :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | S ⊆ ↑p } = ∅ ↔
¬((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ∪ S).IsSatisfiable := by
rw [iff_not_comm, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, Classical.not_not, Set.Nonempty]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Types.lean | 98 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Minor.Restrict
/-!
# Some constructions of matroids
This file defines some very elementary examples of matroids, namely those with at most one base.
## Main definitions
* `emptyOn α` is the matroid on `α` with empty ground set.
For `E : Set α`, ...
* `loopyOn E` is the matroid on `E` whose elements are all loops, or equivalently in which `∅`
is the only base.
* `freeOn E` is the 'free matroid' whose ground set `E` is the only base.
* For `I ⊆ E`, `uniqueBaseOn I E` is the matroid with ground set `E` in which `I` is the only base.
## Implementation details
To avoid the tedious process of certifying the matroid axioms for each of these easy examples,
we bootstrap the definitions starting with `emptyOn α` (which `simp` can prove is a matroid)
and then construct the other examples using duality and restriction.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {E B I X R J : Set α}
namespace Matroid
open Set
section EmptyOn
/-- The `Matroid α` with empty ground set. -/
def emptyOn (α : Type*) : Matroid α where
E := ∅
IsBase := (· = ∅)
Indep := (· = ∅)
indep_iff' := by simp [subset_empty_iff]
exists_isBase := ⟨∅, rfl⟩
isBase_exchange := by rintro _ _ rfl; simp
maximality := by rintro _ _ _ rfl -; exact ⟨∅, by simp [Maximal]⟩
subset_ground := by simp
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_ground : (emptyOn α).E = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_isBase_iff : (emptyOn α).IsBase B ↔ B = ∅ := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_indep_iff : (emptyOn α).Indep I ↔ I = ∅ := Iff.rfl
theorem ground_eq_empty_iff : (M.E = ∅) ↔ M = emptyOn α := by
simp only [emptyOn, ext_iff_indep, iff_self_and]
exact fun h ↦ by simp [h, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_dual_eq : (emptyOn α)✶ = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]; rfl
@[simp] theorem restrict_empty (M : Matroid α) : M ↾ (∅ : Set α) = emptyOn α := by
simp [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
theorem eq_emptyOn_or_nonempty (M : Matroid α) : M = emptyOn α ∨ Matroid.Nonempty M := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
exact M.E.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (fun h ↦ Or.inr ⟨h⟩)
theorem eq_emptyOn [IsEmpty α] (M : Matroid α) : M = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
exact M.E.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance finite_emptyOn (α : Type*) : (emptyOn α).Finite :=
⟨finite_empty⟩
end EmptyOn
section LoopyOn
/-- The `Matroid α` with ground set `E` whose only base is `∅`.
The elements are all 'loops' - see `Matroid.IsLoop` and `Matroid.loopyOn_isLoop_iff`. -/
def loopyOn (E : Set α) : Matroid α := emptyOn α ↾ E
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_ground (E : Set α) : (loopyOn E).E = E := rfl
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_empty (α : Type*) : loopyOn (∅ : Set α) = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff, loopyOn_ground]
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_indep_iff : (loopyOn E).Indep I ↔ I = ∅ := by
simp only [loopyOn, restrict_indep_iff, emptyOn_indep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl; apply empty_subset
theorem eq_loopyOn_iff : M = loopyOn E ↔ M.E = E ∧ ∀ X ⊆ M.E, M.Indep X → X = ∅ := by
simp only [ext_iff_indep, loopyOn_ground, loopyOn_indep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
| rintro rfl
refine ⟨fun h I hI ↦ (h hI).1, fun h I hIE ↦ ⟨h I hIE, by rintro rfl; simp⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Constructions.lean | 99 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file provides properties of measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms between them.
The definition of a measurable space is in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Defs.lean`.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of subsets closed under
complementation and countable union. A function between measurable spaces is measurable if
the preimage of each measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂`
if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`).
In particular, any collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which contains
all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection between the lattices of σ-algebras
on `α` and `β`.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is defined in terms of the
Galois connection induced by `f`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, dynkin system, π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open Set MeasureTheory
universe uι
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort uι} {s : Set α}
namespace MeasurableSpace
section Functors
variable {m m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace α} {m' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measurable space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets
`s : Set β` whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace α) : MeasurableSpace β where
MeasurableSet' s := MeasurableSet[m] <| f ⁻¹' s
measurableSet_empty := m.measurableSet_empty
measurableSet_compl _ hs := m.measurableSet_compl _ hs
measurableSet_iUnion f hf := by simpa only [preimage_iUnion] using m.measurableSet_iUnion _ hf
lemma map_def {s : Set β} : MeasurableSet[m.map f] s ↔ MeasurableSet[m] (f ⁻¹' s) := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : m.map id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
/-- The reverse image of a measurable space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets
`s : Set α` such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : MeasurableSpace β) : MeasurableSpace α where
MeasurableSet' s := ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s
measurableSet_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurableSet_empty, rfl⟩
measurableSet_compl := fun _ ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurableSet_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
measurableSet_iUnion s hs :=
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := Classical.axiom_of_choice hs
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurableSet_iUnion _ fun i => (hs' i).left, by simp [hs']⟩
lemma measurableSet_comap {m : MeasurableSpace β} :
MeasurableSet[m.comap f] s ↔ ∃ s', MeasurableSet[m] s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s := .rfl
theorem comap_eq_generateFrom (m : MeasurableSpace β) (f : α → β) :
m.comap f = generateFrom { t | ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ f ⁻¹' s = t } :=
(@generateFrom_measurableSet _ (.comap f m)).symm
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun s => ⟨fun ⟨_, hs', h⟩ => h ▸ hs', fun h => ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
MeasurableSpace.ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩ => ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, fun ⟨t, h, ht⟩ => ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨fun h _s hs => h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, fun h _s ⟨_t, ht, heq⟩ => heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
theorem gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
GaloisConnection (MeasurableSpace.comap f) (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ =>
comap_le_iff_le_map
theorem map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
theorem monotone_map : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.map f) := fun _ _ => map_mono
theorem comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
theorem monotone_comap : Monotone (MeasurableSpace.comap g) := fun _ _ h => comap_mono h
@[simp]
theorem comap_bot : (⊥ : MeasurableSpace α).comap g = ⊥ :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_iSup {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨆ i, m i).comap g = ⨆ i, (m i).comap g :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem map_top : (⊤ : MeasurableSpace α).map f = ⊤ :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_inf
@[simp]
theorem map_iInf {m : ι → MeasurableSpace α} : (⨅ i, m i).map f = ⨅ i, (m i).map f :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_iInf
theorem comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m :=
(gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
theorem le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g :=
(gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
end Functors
@[simp] theorem map_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.map (fun _a : α ↦ b) m = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| fun s _ ↦ by rw [map_def]; by_cases h : b ∈ s <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem comap_const {m} (b : β) : MeasurableSpace.comap (fun _a : α => b) m = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| by rintro _ ⟨s, -, rfl⟩; by_cases b ∈ s <;> simp [*]
theorem comap_generateFrom {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} :
(generateFrom s).comap f = generateFrom (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <|
generateFrom_le fun _t hts => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ <| mem_image_of_mem _ <| hts)
(generateFrom_le fun _t ⟨u, hu, Eq⟩ => Eq ▸ ⟨u, GenerateMeasurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
end MeasurableSpace
section MeasurableFunctions
open MeasurableSpace
theorem measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Measurable.le_map, Measurable.of_le_map⟩ := measurable_iff_le_map
theorem measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : MeasurableSpace α} {m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} :
Measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
alias ⟨Measurable.comap_le, Measurable.of_comap_le⟩ := measurable_iff_comap_le
theorem comap_measurable {m : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) : Measurable[m.comap f] f :=
fun s hs => ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
theorem Measurable.mono {ma ma' : MeasurableSpace α} {mb mb' : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @Measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) : @Measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
fun _t ht => ha _ <| hf <| hb _ ht
lemma Measurable.iSup' {mα : ι → MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} (i₀ : ι)
(h : Measurable[mα i₀] f) :
Measurable[⨆ i, mα i] f :=
h.mono (le_iSup mα i₀) le_rfl
lemma Measurable.sup_of_left {mα mα' : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(h : Measurable[mα] f) :
Measurable[mα ⊔ mα'] f :=
h.mono le_sup_left le_rfl
lemma Measurable.sup_of_right {mα mα' : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(h : Measurable[mα'] f) :
Measurable[mα ⊔ mα'] f :=
h.mono le_sup_right le_rfl
theorem measurable_id'' {m mα : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ mα) : @Measurable α α mα m id :=
measurable_id.mono le_rfl hm
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_from_top [MeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} : Measurable[⊤] f := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem measurable_generateFrom [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t)) : @Measurable _ _ _ (generateFrom s) f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <| generateFrom_le h
variable {f g : α → β}
section TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.measurable [Subsingleton α] : Measurable f := fun _ _ =>
@Subsingleton.measurableSet α _ _ _
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
fun s _ => Subsingleton.set_cases MeasurableSet.empty MeasurableSet.univ s
@[to_additive (attr := measurability, fun_prop)]
theorem measurable_one [One α] : Measurable (1 : β → α) :=
@measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
theorem measurable_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
Subsingleton.measurable
theorem measurable_of_empty_codomain [IsEmpty β] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f
/-- A version of `measurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`. This version works
for functions between empty types. -/
theorem measurable_const' {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : Measurable f := by
nontriviality β
inhabit β
convert @measurable_const α β _ _ (f default) using 2
apply hf
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_natCast [NatCast α] (n : ℕ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_intCast [IntCast α] (n : ℤ) : Measurable (n : β → α) :=
@measurable_const α _ _ _ n
theorem measurable_of_countable [Countable α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) :
Measurable f := fun s _ =>
(f ⁻¹' s).to_countable.measurableSet
theorem measurable_of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_countable f
end TypeclassMeasurableSpace
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.iterate {f : α → α} (hf : Measurable f) : ∀ n, Measurable f^[n]
| 0 => measurable_id
| n + 1 => (Measurable.iterate hf n).comp hf
variable {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_preimage {t : Set β} (hf : Measurable f) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
protected theorem MeasurableSet.preimage {t : Set β} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
@[measurability, fun_prop]
protected theorem Measurable.piecewise {_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable (piecewise s f g) := by
intro t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage]
exact hs.ite (hf ht) (hg ht)
/-- This is slightly different from `Measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`Measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact Measurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `Measurable.ite` by `Measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
theorem Measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a })
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
Measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability, fun_prop]
theorem Measurable.indicator [Zero β] (hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
/-- The measurability of a set `A` is equivalent to the measurability of the indicator function
which takes a constant value `b ≠ 0` on a set `A` and `0` elsewhere. -/
lemma measurable_indicator_const_iff [Zero β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (b : β) [NeZero b] :
Measurable (s.indicator (fun (_ : α) ↦ b)) ↔ MeasurableSet s := by
constructor <;> intro h
· convert h (MeasurableSet.singleton (0 : β)).compl
ext a
simp [NeZero.ne b]
· exact measurable_const.indicator h
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem measurableSet_mulSupport [One β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet (Function.mulSupport f) :=
hf (measurableSet_singleton 1).compl
/-- If a function coincides with a measurable function outside of a countable set, it is
measurable. -/
theorem Measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (hf : Measurable f)
(h : Set.Countable { x | f x ≠ g x }) : Measurable g := by
intro t ht
have : g ⁻¹' t = g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x }ᶜ ∪ g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x | f x = g x } := by
simp [← inter_union_distrib_left]
rw [this]
refine (h.mono inter_subset_right).measurableSet.union ?_
have : g ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } = f ⁻¹' t ∩ { x : α | f x = g x } := by
ext x
simp +contextual
rw [this]
exact (hf ht).inter h.measurableSet.of_compl
end MeasurableFunctions
/-- We say that a collection of sets is countably spanning if a countable subset spans the
whole type. This is a useful condition in various parts of measure theory. For example, it is
a needed condition to show that the product of two collections generate the product sigma algebra,
see `generateFrom_prod_eq`. -/
def IsCountablySpanning (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, s n ∈ C) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ
theorem isCountablySpanning_measurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCountablySpanning { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } :=
⟨fun _ => univ, fun _ => MeasurableSet.univ, iUnion_const _⟩
/-- Rectangles of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
lemma IsCountablySpanning.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) : IsCountablySpanning (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rcases hC, hD with ⟨⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩, t, h1t, h2t⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n.unpair.1 ×ˢ t n.unpair.2, fun n => mem_image2_of_mem (h1s _) (h1t _), ?_⟩
rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, h2s, h2t, univ_prod_univ]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Basic.lean | 859 | 865 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Felix Weilacher. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Felix Weilacher, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Embedding
import Mathlib.Data.Set.MemPartition
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableSeparatingOn
/-!
# Countably generated measurable spaces
We say a measurable space is countably generated if it can be generated by a countable set of sets.
In such a space, we can also build a sequence of finer and finer finite measurable partitions of
the space such that the measurable space is generated by the union of all partitions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated`: class stating that a measurable space is countably
generated.
* `MeasurableSpace.countableGeneratingSet`: a countable set of sets that generates the σ-algebra.
* `MeasurableSpace.countablePartition`: sequences of finer and finer partitions of
a countably generated space, defined by taking the `memPartition` of an enumeration of the sets in
`countableGeneratingSet`.
* `MeasurableSpace.SeparatesPoints` : class stating that a measurable space separates points.
## Main statements
* `MeasurableSpace.measurableEquiv_nat_bool_of_countablyGenerated`: if a measurable space is
countably generated and separates points, it is measure equivalent to a subset of the Cantor Space
`ℕ → Bool` (equipped with the product sigma algebra).
* `MeasurableSpace.measurable_injection_nat_bool_of_countablySeparated`: If a measurable space
admits a countable sequence of measurable sets separating points,
it admits a measurable injection into the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool`
`ℕ → Bool` (equipped with the product sigma algebra).
The file also contains measurability results about `memPartition`, from which the properties of
`countablePartition` are deduced.
-/
open Set MeasureTheory
namespace MeasurableSpace
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- We say a measurable space is countably generated
if it can be generated by a countable set of sets. -/
class CountablyGenerated (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
isCountablyGenerated : ∃ b : Set (Set α), b.Countable ∧ m = generateFrom b
/-- A countable set of sets that generate the measurable space.
We insert `∅` to ensure it is nonempty. -/
def countableGeneratingSet (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set (Set α) :=
insert ∅ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose
lemma countable_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Countable (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
Countable.insert _ h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.1
lemma generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet [m : MeasurableSpace α] [h : CountablyGenerated α] :
generateFrom (countableGeneratingSet α) = m :=
(generateFrom_insert_empty _).trans <| h.isCountablyGenerated.choose_spec.2.symm
lemma empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
∅ ∈ countableGeneratingSet α := mem_insert _ _
lemma nonempty_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Set.Nonempty (countableGeneratingSet α) :=
⟨∅, mem_insert _ _⟩
lemma measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
{s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ countableGeneratingSet α) :
MeasurableSet s := by
rw [← generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)]
exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
/-- A countable sequence of sets generating the measurable space. -/
def natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] : ℕ → (Set α) :=
enumerateCountable (countable_countableGeneratingSet (α := α)) ∅
lemma generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] : generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _)) = m := by
rw [natGeneratingSequence, range_enumerateCountable_of_mem _ empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet,
generateFrom_countableGeneratingSet]
lemma measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (n : ℕ) :
MeasurableSet (natGeneratingSequence α n) :=
measurableSet_countableGeneratingSet <| Set.enumerateCountable_mem _
empty_mem_countableGeneratingSet n
theorem CountablyGenerated.comap [m : MeasurableSpace β] [h : CountablyGenerated β] (f : α → β) :
@CountablyGenerated α (.comap f m) := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨b, hbc, rfl⟩⟩
rw [comap_generateFrom]
letI := generateFrom (preimage f '' b)
exact ⟨_, hbc.image _, rfl⟩
theorem CountablyGenerated.sup {m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace β} (h₁ : @CountablyGenerated β m₁)
(h₂ : @CountablyGenerated β m₂) : @CountablyGenerated β (m₁ ⊔ m₂) := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁c, rfl⟩⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂c, rfl⟩⟩
exact @mk _ (_ ⊔ _) ⟨_, hb₁c.union hb₂c, generateFrom_sup_generateFrom⟩
/-- Any measurable space structure on a countable space is countably generated. -/
instance (priority := 100) [MeasurableSpace α] [Countable α] : CountablyGenerated α where
isCountablyGenerated := by
refine ⟨⋃ y, {measurableAtom y}, countable_iUnion (fun i ↦ countable_singleton _), ?_⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le (by simp [MeasurableSet.measurableAtom_of_countable]))
intro s hs
have : s = ⋃ y ∈ s, measurableAtom y := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro x hx
simpa using ⟨x, hx, by simp⟩
· simp only [iUnion_subset_iff]
intro x hx
exact measurableAtom_subset hs hx
rw [this]
apply MeasurableSet.biUnion (to_countable s) (fun x _hx ↦ ?_)
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
simp
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] {p : α → Prop} :
CountablyGenerated { x // p x } := .comap _
instance [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] [MeasurableSpace β] [CountablyGenerated β] :
CountablyGenerated (α × β) :=
.sup (.comap Prod.fst) (.comap Prod.snd)
section SeparatesPoints
/-- We say that a measurable space separates points if for any two distinct points,
there is a measurable set containing one but not the other. -/
class SeparatesPoints (α : Type*) [m : MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
separates : ∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) → x = y
theorem separatesPoints_def [MeasurableSpace α] [hs : SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s → y ∈ s)) : x = y := hs.separates _ _ h
theorem exists_measurableSet_of_ne [MeasurableSpace α] [SeparatesPoints α] {x y : α}
(h : x ≠ y) : ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∉ s := by
contrapose! h
exact separatesPoints_def h
theorem separatesPoints_iff [MeasurableSpace α] : SeparatesPoints α ↔
∀ x y : α, (∀ s, MeasurableSet s → (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s)) → x = y :=
⟨fun h ↦ fun _ _ hxy ↦ h.separates _ _ fun _ hs xs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp xs,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ h _ _ fun _ hs ↦
⟨fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs xs, not_imp_not.mp fun xs ↦ hxy _ hs.compl xs⟩⟩⟩
/-- If the measurable space generated by `S` separates points,
then this is witnessed by sets in `S`. -/
theorem separating_of_generateFrom (S : Set (Set α))
[h : @SeparatesPoints α (generateFrom S)] :
∀ x y : α, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y := by
letI := generateFrom S
intros x y hxy
rw [← forall_generateFrom_mem_iff_mem_iff] at hxy
exact separatesPoints_def <| fun _ hs ↦ (hxy _ hs).mp
theorem SeparatesPoints.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @SeparatesPoints _ m] (h : m ≤ m') :
@SeparatesPoints _ m' := @SeparatesPoints.mk _ m' fun _ _ hxy ↦
@SeparatesPoints.separates _ m hsep _ _ fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ (h _ hs)
/-- We say that a measurable space is countably separated if there is a
countable sequence of measurable sets separating points. -/
class CountablySeparated (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
countably_separated : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ
instance countablySeparated_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ] : CountablySeparated α := ⟨h⟩
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] : HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
h.countably_separated
theorem countablySeparated_def [MeasurableSpace α] :
CountablySeparated α ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet univ :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.countably_separated, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem CountablySeparated.mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [hsep : @CountablySeparated _ m]
(h : m ≤ m') : @CountablySeparated _ m' := by
simp_rw [countablySeparated_def] at *
rcases hsep with ⟨S, Sct, Smeas, hS⟩
use S, Sct, (fun s hs ↦ h _ <| Smeas _ hs), hS
theorem CountablySeparated.subtype_iff [MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} :
CountablySeparated s ↔ HasCountableSeparatingOn α MeasurableSet s := by
rw [countablySeparated_def]
exact HasCountableSeparatingOn.subtype_iff
instance (priority := 100) Subtype.separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α] [h : SeparatesPoints α]
{s : Set α} : SeparatesPoints s :=
⟨fun _ _ hxy ↦ Subtype.val_injective <| h.1 _ _ fun _ ht ↦ hxy _ <| measurable_subtype_coe ht⟩
instance (priority := 100) Subtype.countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] {s : Set α} : CountablySeparated s := by
rw [CountablySeparated.subtype_iff]
exact h.countably_separated.mono (fun s ↦ id) <| subset_univ _
instance (priority := 100) separatesPoints_of_measurableSingletonClass [MeasurableSpace α]
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] : SeparatesPoints α := by
refine ⟨fun x y h ↦ ?_⟩
specialize h _ (MeasurableSet.singleton x)
simp_rw [mem_singleton_iff, forall_true_left] at h
exact h.symm
instance (priority := 50) MeasurableSingletonClass.of_separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α]
[Countable α] [SeparatesPoints α] : MeasurableSingletonClass α where
measurableSet_singleton x := by
choose s hsm hxs hys using fun y (h : x ≠ y) ↦ exists_measurableSet_of_ne h
convert MeasurableSet.iInter fun y ↦ .iInter fun h ↦ hsm y h
ext y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl | h
· simpa
· simp only [mem_singleton_iff, h.symm, false_iff, mem_iInter, not_forall]
exact ⟨y, h, hys y h⟩
instance hasCountableSeparatingOn_of_countablySeparated_subtype
[MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} [h : CountablySeparated s] :
HasCountableSeparatingOn _ MeasurableSet s := CountablySeparated.subtype_iff.mp h
instance countablySeparated_subtype_of_hasCountableSeparatingOn
[MeasurableSpace α] {s : Set α} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn _ MeasurableSet s] :
CountablySeparated s := CountablySeparated.subtype_iff.mpr h
instance countablySeparated_of_separatesPoints [MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablyGenerated α] [SeparatesPoints α] : CountablySeparated α := by
rcases h with ⟨b, hbc, hb⟩
refine ⟨⟨b, hbc, fun t ht ↦ hb.symm ▸ .basic t ht, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hb] at ‹SeparatesPoints _›
convert separating_of_generateFrom b
simp
variable (α)
/-- If a measurable space admits a countable separating family of measurable sets,
there is a countably generated coarser space which still separates points. -/
theorem exists_countablyGenerated_le_of_countablySeparated [m : MeasurableSpace α]
[h : CountablySeparated α] :
∃ m' : MeasurableSpace α, @CountablyGenerated _ m' ∧ @SeparatesPoints _ m' ∧ m' ≤ m := by
rcases h with ⟨b, bct, hbm, hb⟩
refine ⟨generateFrom b, ?_, ?_, generateFrom_le hbm⟩
· use b
rw [@separatesPoints_iff]
exact fun x y hxy ↦ hb _ trivial _ trivial fun _ hs ↦ hxy _ <| measurableSet_generateFrom hs
open Function
open Classical in
/-- A map from a measurable space to the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool` induced by a countable
sequence of sets generating the measurable space. -/
noncomputable
def mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] (x : α) (n : ℕ) :
Bool := x ∈ natGeneratingSequence α n
theorem measurable_mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α] :
Measurable (mapNatBool α) := by
rw [measurable_pi_iff]
refine fun n ↦ measurable_to_bool ?_
simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mapNatBool,
Bool.decide_iff, setOf_mem_eq]
apply measurableSet_natGeneratingSequence
theorem injective_mapNatBool [MeasurableSpace α] [CountablyGenerated α]
[SeparatesPoints α] : Injective (mapNatBool α) := by
intro x y hxy
rw [← generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence α] at *
apply separating_of_generateFrom (range (natGeneratingSequence _))
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← decide_eq_decide]
exact congr_fun hxy n
/-- If a measurable space is countably generated and separates points, it is measure equivalent
to some subset of the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool` (equipped with the product sigma algebra).
Note: `s` need not be measurable, so this map need not be a `MeasurableEmbedding` to
the Cantor Space. -/
theorem measurableEquiv_nat_bool_of_countablyGenerated [MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablyGenerated α] [SeparatesPoints α] :
∃ s : Set (ℕ → Bool), Nonempty (α ≃ᵐ s) := by
use range (mapNatBool α), Equiv.ofInjective _ <|
injective_mapNatBool _,
Measurable.subtype_mk <| measurable_mapNatBool _
simp_rw [← generateFrom_natGeneratingSequence α]
apply measurable_generateFrom
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← Equiv.image_eq_preimage _ _]
refine ⟨{y | y n}, by measurability, ?_⟩
rw [← Equiv.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image]
simp [mapNatBool]
/-- If a measurable space admits a countable sequence of measurable sets separating points,
it admits a measurable injection into the Cantor space `ℕ → Bool`
(equipped with the product sigma algebra). -/
theorem measurable_injection_nat_bool_of_countablySeparated [MeasurableSpace α]
[CountablySeparated α] : ∃ f : α → ℕ → Bool, Measurable f ∧ Injective f := by
rcases exists_countablyGenerated_le_of_countablySeparated α with ⟨m', _, _, m'le⟩
refine ⟨mapNatBool α, ?_, injective_mapNatBool _⟩
exact (measurable_mapNatBool _).mono m'le le_rfl
variable {α}
--TODO: Make this an instance
theorem measurableSingletonClass_of_countablySeparated
[MeasurableSpace α] [CountablySeparated α] :
MeasurableSingletonClass α := by
rcases measurable_injection_nat_bool_of_countablySeparated α with ⟨f, fmeas, finj⟩
refine ⟨fun x ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← finj.preimage_image {x}, image_singleton]
exact fmeas <| MeasurableSet.singleton _
end SeparatesPoints
section MeasurableMemPartition
lemma measurableSet_succ_memPartition (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) {s : Set α}
(hs : s ∈ memPartition t n) :
MeasurableSet[generateFrom (memPartition t (n + 1))] s := by
rw [← diff_union_inter s (t n)]
refine MeasurableSet.union ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine measurableSet_generateFrom ?_
rw [memPartition_succ]
exact ⟨s, hs, by simp⟩
lemma generateFrom_memPartition_le_succ (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) :
generateFrom (memPartition t n) ≤ generateFrom (memPartition t (n + 1)) :=
generateFrom_le (fun _ hs ↦ measurableSet_succ_memPartition t n hs)
lemma measurableSet_generateFrom_memPartition_iff (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) (s : Set α) :
MeasurableSet[generateFrom (memPartition t n)] s
↔ ∃ S : Finset (Set α), ↑S ⊆ memPartition t n ∧ s = ⋃₀ S := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨S, hS_subset, hS_eq⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· induction s, h using generateFrom_induction with
| hC u hu _ => exact ⟨{u}, by simp [hu], by simp⟩
| empty => exact ⟨∅, by simp, by simp⟩
| compl u _ hu =>
obtain ⟨S, hS_subset, rfl⟩ := hu
classical
refine ⟨(memPartition t n).toFinset \ S, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [Finset.coe_sdiff, coe_toFinset]
exact diff_subset
· simp only [Finset.coe_sdiff, coe_toFinset]
refine (IsCompl.eq_compl ⟨?_, ?_⟩).symm
· refine Set.disjoint_sUnion_right.mpr fun u huS => ?_
refine Set.disjoint_sUnion_left.mpr fun v huV => ?_
refine disjoint_memPartition t n (mem_of_mem_diff huV) (hS_subset huS) ?_
exact ne_of_mem_of_not_mem huS (not_mem_of_mem_diff huV) |>.symm
· rw [codisjoint_iff]
simp only [sup_eq_union, top_eq_univ]
rw [← sUnion_memPartition t n, union_comm, ← sUnion_union, union_diff_cancel hS_subset]
| iUnion f _ h =>
choose S hS_subset hS_eq using h
have : Fintype (⋃ n, (S n : Set (Set α))) := by
refine (Finite.subset (finite_memPartition t n) ?_).fintype
simp only [iUnion_subset_iff]
exact hS_subset
refine ⟨(⋃ n, (S n : Set (Set α))).toFinset, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [coe_toFinset, iUnion_subset_iff]
exact hS_subset
· simp only [coe_toFinset, sUnion_iUnion, hS_eq]
· rw [hS_eq, sUnion_eq_biUnion]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion ?_ (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
· exact S.countable_toSet
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom (hS_subset ht)
lemma measurableSet_generateFrom_memPartition (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) :
MeasurableSet[generateFrom (memPartition t (n + 1))] (t n) := by
have : t n = ⋃ u ∈ memPartition t n, u ∩ t n := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_inter, ← sUnion_eq_biUnion, sUnion_memPartition, univ_inter]
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (finite_memPartition _ _).countable (fun v hv ↦ ?_)
refine measurableSet_generateFrom ?_
rw [memPartition_succ]
exact ⟨v, hv, Or.inl rfl⟩
lemma generateFrom_iUnion_memPartition (t : ℕ → Set α) :
generateFrom (⋃ n, memPartition t n) = generateFrom (range t) := by
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le fun u hu ↦ ?_) (generateFrom_le fun u hu ↦ ?_)
· simp only [mem_iUnion] at hu
obtain ⟨n, hun⟩ := hu
induction n generalizing u with
| zero =>
simp only [memPartition_zero, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at hun
rw [hun]
exact MeasurableSet.univ
| succ n ih =>
simp only [memPartition_succ, mem_setOf_eq] at hun
obtain ⟨v, hv, huv⟩ := hun
rcases huv with rfl | rfl
· exact (ih v hv).inter (measurableSet_generateFrom ⟨n, rfl⟩)
· exact (ih v hv).diff (measurableSet_generateFrom ⟨n, rfl⟩)
· simp only [iUnion_singleton_eq_range, mem_range] at hu
| obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hu
exact generateFrom_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) _ (measurableSet_generateFrom_memPartition t n)
lemma generateFrom_memPartition_le_range (t : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) :
generateFrom (memPartition t n) ≤ generateFrom (range t) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← generateFrom_iUnion_memPartition t]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/CountablyGenerated.lean | 396 | 401 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Justus Springer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Justus Springer, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Colimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.FilteredColimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Limits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.SheafedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Stalks
/-!
# Ringed spaces
We introduce the category of ringed spaces, as an alias for `SheafedSpace CommRingCat`.
The facts collected in this file are typically stated for locally ringed spaces, but never actually
make use of the locality of stalks. See for instance <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/01HZ>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
open TopologicalSpace
open Opposite
open TopCat
open TopCat.Presheaf
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The type of Ringed spaces, as an abbreviation for `SheafedSpace CommRingCat`. -/
@[nolint checkUnivs] -- The universes appear together in the type, but separately in the value.
abbrev RingedSpace : Type max (u+1) (v+1) :=
SheafedSpace.{v+1, v, u} CommRingCat.{v}
namespace RingedSpace
open SheafedSpace
@[simp]
lemma res_zero {X : RingedSpace.{u}} {U V : TopologicalSpace.Opens X}
(hUV : U ≤ V) : (0 : X.presheaf.obj (op V)) |_ U = (0 : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :=
RingHom.map_zero _
variable (X : RingedSpace)
instance : CoeSort RingedSpace Type* where
coe X := X.carrier
/-- If the germ of a section `f` is zero in the stalk at `x`, then `f` is zero on some neighbourhood
around `x`. -/
lemma exists_res_eq_zero_of_germ_eq_zero (U : Opens X) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (x : U)
(h : X.presheaf.germ U x.val x.property f = 0) :
∃ (V : Opens X) (i : V ⟶ U) (_ : x.1 ∈ V), X.presheaf.map i.op f = 0 := by
have h1 : X.presheaf.germ U x.val x.property f = X.presheaf.germ U x.val x.property 0 := by simpa
obtain ⟨V, hv, i, _, (hv4 : (X.presheaf.map i.op) f = (X.presheaf.map _) 0)⟩ :=
TopCat.Presheaf.germ_eq X.presheaf x.1 x.2 x.2 f 0 h1
use V, i, hv
simpa using hv4
/--
If the germ of a section `f` is a unit in the stalk at `x`, then `f` must be a unit on some small
neighborhood around `x`.
-/
theorem isUnit_res_of_isUnit_germ (U : Opens X) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U)
(h : IsUnit (X.presheaf.germ U x hx f)) :
∃ (V : Opens X) (i : V ⟶ U) (_ : x ∈ V), IsUnit (X.presheaf.map i.op f) := by
obtain ⟨g', heq⟩ := h.exists_right_inv
obtain ⟨V, hxV, g, rfl⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_exist x g'
let W := U ⊓ V
have hxW : x ∈ W := ⟨hx, hxV⟩
-- Porting note: `erw` can't write into `HEq`, so this is replaced with another `HEq` in the
-- desired form
replace heq : (X.presheaf.germ _ x hxW) ((X.presheaf.map (U.infLELeft V).op) f *
(X.presheaf.map (U.infLERight V).op) g) = (X.presheaf.germ _ x hxW) 1 := by
dsimp [germ]
erw [map_mul, map_one, show X.presheaf.germ _ x hxW ((X.presheaf.map (U.infLELeft V).op) f) =
X.presheaf.germ U x hx f from X.presheaf.germ_res_apply (Opens.infLELeft U V) x hxW f,
show X.presheaf.germ _ x hxW (X.presheaf.map (U.infLERight V).op g) =
X.presheaf.germ _ x hxV g from X.presheaf.germ_res_apply (Opens.infLERight U V) x hxW g]
exact heq
-- note: we have to force lean to resynthesize this as <...>.hom _ = <...>.hom _
obtain ⟨W', hxW', i₁, i₂, (heq' : (X.presheaf.map i₁.op) _ = (X.presheaf.map i₂.op) 1)⟩ :=
X.presheaf.germ_eq x hxW hxW _ _ heq
use W', i₁ ≫ Opens.infLELeft U V, hxW'
simp only [map_mul, map_one] at heq'
simpa using isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ _ heq'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-08")] alias _root_.CommRingCat.germ_res_apply := germ_res_apply
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-08")] alias _root_.CommRingCat.germ_res_apply' := germ_res_apply'
/-- If a section `f` is a unit in each stalk, `f` must be a unit. -/
theorem isUnit_of_isUnit_germ (U : Opens X) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U))
(h : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ U), IsUnit (X.presheaf.germ U x hx f)) : IsUnit f := by
-- We pick a cover of `U` by open sets `V x`, such that `f` is a unit on each `V x`.
choose V iVU m h_unit using fun x : U => X.isUnit_res_of_isUnit_germ U f x x.2 (h x.1 x.2)
have hcover : U ≤ iSup V := by
intro x hxU
-- Porting note: in Lean3 `rw` is sufficient
erw [Opens.mem_iSup]
exact ⟨⟨x, hxU⟩, m ⟨x, hxU⟩⟩
-- Let `g x` denote the inverse of `f` in `U x`.
choose g hg using fun x : U => IsUnit.exists_right_inv (h_unit x)
have ic : IsCompatible (sheaf X).val V g := by
intro x y
apply section_ext X.sheaf (V x ⊓ V y)
rintro z ⟨hzVx, hzVy⟩
rw [germ_res_apply, germ_res_apply]
apply (h z ((iVU x).le hzVx)).mul_right_inj.mp
-- Porting note: now need explicitly typing the rewrites
-- note: this is bad, I think we should replace the `FunLike` on
-- concrete category with `CoeFun`
rw [← germ_res_apply X.presheaf (iVU x) z hzVx f]
-- Porting note: change was not necessary in Lean3
change X.presheaf.germ _ z hzVx _ * (X.presheaf.germ _ z hzVx _) =
X.presheaf.germ _ z hzVx _ * X.presheaf.germ _ z hzVy (g y)
rw [← RingHom.map_mul,
congr_arg (X.presheaf.germ (V x) z hzVx) (hg x),
germ_res_apply X.presheaf _ _ _ f,
← germ_res_apply X.presheaf (iVU y) z hzVy f,
← RingHom.map_mul,
congr_arg (X.presheaf.germ (V y) z hzVy) (hg y), RingHom.map_one, RingHom.map_one]
-- We claim that these local inverses glue together to a global inverse of `f`.
obtain ⟨gl, gl_spec, -⟩ :
-- We need to rephrase the result from `HasForget` to `CommRingCat`.
∃ gl : X.presheaf.obj (op U), (∀ i, ((sheaf X).val.map (iVU i).op) gl = g i) ∧ _ :=
X.sheaf.existsUnique_gluing' V U iVU hcover g ic
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one f gl
apply X.sheaf.eq_of_locally_eq' V U iVU hcover
intro i
-- We need to rephrase the goal from `HasForget` to `CommRingCat`.
show ((sheaf X).val.map (iVU i).op).hom (f * gl) = ((sheaf X).val.map (iVU i).op) 1
rw [RingHom.map_one, RingHom.map_mul, gl_spec]
exact hg i
/-- The basic open of a section `f` is the set of all points `x`, such that the germ of `f` at
`x` is a unit.
-/
def basicOpen {U : Opens X} (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) : Opens X where
carrier := { x : X | ∃ (hx : x ∈ U), IsUnit (X.presheaf.germ U x hx f) }
is_open' := by
rw [isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open]
rintro x ⟨hxU, hx⟩
obtain ⟨V, i, hxV, hf⟩ := X.isUnit_res_of_isUnit_germ U f x hxU hx
use V.1
refine ⟨?_, V.2, hxV⟩
intro y hy
use i.le hy
convert RingHom.isUnit_map (X.presheaf.germ _ y hy).hom hf
exact (X.presheaf.germ_res_apply i y hy f).symm
theorem mem_basicOpen {U : Opens X} (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
x ∈ X.basicOpen f ↔ IsUnit (X.presheaf.germ U x hx f) :=
⟨Exists.choose_spec, (⟨hx, ·⟩)⟩
/-- A variant of `mem_basicOpen` with bundled `x : U`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_basicOpen' {U : Opens X} (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (x : U) :
↑x ∈ X.basicOpen f ↔ IsUnit (X.presheaf.germ U x.1 x.2 f) :=
mem_basicOpen X f x.1 x.2
@[simp]
theorem mem_top_basicOpen (f : X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤)) (x : X) :
x ∈ X.basicOpen f ↔ IsUnit (X.presheaf.Γgerm x f) :=
mem_basicOpen X f x .intro
theorem basicOpen_le {U : Opens X} (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) : X.basicOpen f ≤ U := by
rintro x ⟨h, _⟩; exact h
/-- The restriction of a section `f` to the basic open of `f` is a unit. -/
theorem isUnit_res_basicOpen {U : Opens X} (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
IsUnit (X.presheaf.map (@homOfLE (Opens X) _ _ _ (X.basicOpen_le f)).op f) := by
apply isUnit_of_isUnit_germ
rintro x ⟨hxU, hx⟩
convert hx
exact X.presheaf.germ_res_apply _ _ _ _
|
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_res {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) (f : X.presheaf.obj U) :
@basicOpen X (unop V) (X.presheaf.map i f) = unop V ⊓ @basicOpen X (unop U) f := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨hxV, hx⟩
rw [germ_res_apply' X.presheaf] at hx
exact ⟨hxV, i.unop.le hxV, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨hxV, _, hx⟩
refine ⟨hxV, ?_⟩
rw [germ_res_apply' X.presheaf]
exact hx
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/Basic.lean | 183 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Kernel
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Condexp
/-!
# Conditional Independence
We define conditional independence of sets/σ-algebras/functions with respect to a σ-algebra.
Two σ-algebras `m₁` and `m₂` are conditionally independent given a third σ-algebra `m'` if for all
`m₁`-measurable sets `t₁` and `m₂`-measurable sets `t₂`,
`μ⟦t₁ ∩ t₂ | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦t₁ | m'⟧ * μ⟦t₂ | m'⟧`.
On standard Borel spaces, the conditional expectation with respect to `m'` defines a kernel
`ProbabilityTheory.condExpKernel`, and the definition above is equivalent to
`∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, condExpKernel μ m' ω (t₁ ∩ t₂) = condExpKernel μ m' ω t₁ * condExpKernel μ m' ω t₂`.
We use this property as the definition of conditional independence.
## Main definitions
We provide four definitions of conditional independence:
* `iCondIndepSets`: conditional independence of a family of sets of sets `pi : ι → Set (Set Ω)`.
This is meant to be used with π-systems.
* `iCondIndep`: conditional independence of a family of measurable space structures
`m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω`,
* `iCondIndepSet`: conditional independence of a family of sets `s : ι → Set Ω`,
* `iCondIndepFun`: conditional independence of a family of functions. For measurable spaces
`m : Π (i : ι), MeasurableSpace (β i)`, we consider functions `f : Π (i : ι), Ω → β i`.
Additionally, we provide four corresponding statements for two measurable space structures (resp.
sets of sets, sets, functions) instead of a family. These properties are denoted by the same names
as for a family, but without the starting `i`, for example `CondIndepFun` is the version of
`iCondIndepFun` for two functions.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepSets.iCondIndep`: if π-systems are conditionally independent as sets
of sets, then the measurable space structures they generate are conditionally independent.
* `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepSets.condIndep`: variant with two π-systems.
## Implementation notes
The definitions of conditional independence in this file are a particular case of independence with
respect to a kernel and a measure, as defined in the file `Probability/Independence/Kernel.lean`.
The kernel used is `ProbabilityTheory.condExpKernel`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*}
section Definitions
section
variable (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω] (hm' : m' ≤ mΩ)
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is conditionally independent given `m'` with
respect to a measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `μ⟦⋂ i in s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, μ⟦f i | m'⟧`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepSets_iff`.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def iCondIndepSets (π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepSets π (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are conditionally independent given `m'` with respect to a measure
`μ` if for any sets `t₁ ∈ s₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `μ⟦t₁ ∩ t₂ | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦t₁ | m'⟧ * μ⟦t₂ | m'⟧`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepSets_iff`. -/
def CondIndepSets (s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
Prop :=
Kernel.IndepSets s1 s2 (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is conditionally independent given
`m'` with respect to a measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of
measurable sets they define is independent. `m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω` is conditionally independent
given `m'` with respect to measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for
any sets `f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then
`μ⟦⋂ i in s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, μ⟦f i | m'⟧ `.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndep_iff`. -/
def iCondIndep (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω)
(μ : @Measure Ω mΩ := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndep m (condExpKernel (mΩ := mΩ) μ m') (μ.trim hm')
end
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are conditionally independent given
`m'` with respect to a measure `μ` (defined on a third σ-algebra) if for any sets
`t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`, `μ⟦t₁ ∩ t₂ | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦t₁ | m'⟧ * μ⟦t₂ | m'⟧`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndep_iff`. -/
def CondIndep (m' m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω)
{mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω]
(hm' : m' ≤ mΩ) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.Indep m₁ m₂ (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
section
variable (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω]
(hm' : m' ≤ mΩ)
/-- A family of sets is conditionally independent if the family of measurable space structures they
generate is conditionally independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable
sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepSet_iff`. -/
def iCondIndepSet (s : ι → Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepSet s (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- Two sets are conditionally independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
conditionally independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable
sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepSet_iff`. -/
def CondIndepSet (s t : Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepSet s t (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `Ω` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is conditionally independent if the family of
measurable space structures they generate on `Ω` is conditionally independent. For a function `g`
with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is
`m.comap g`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepFun_iff`. -/
def iCondIndepFun {β : ι → Type*} [m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x)]
(f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepFun f (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- Two functions are conditionally independent if the two measurable space structures they generate
are conditionally independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure
`m`, the generated measurable space structure is `m.comap f`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepFun_iff`. -/
def CondIndepFun {β γ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
(f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepFun f g (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
end
end Definitions
section DefinitionLemmas
section
variable (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω] (hm' : m' ≤ mΩ)
lemma iCondIndepSets_iff (π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (hπ : ∀ i s (_hs : s ∈ π i), MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndepSets m' hm' π μ ↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
μ⟦⋂ i ∈ s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, (μ⟦f i | m'⟧) := by
simp only [iCondIndepSets, Kernel.iIndepSets]
have h_eq' : ∀ (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set Ω) (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i) i (_hi : i ∈ s),
(fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (f i))) =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦f i | m'⟧ :=
fun s f H i hi ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' (hπ i (f i) (H i hi))
have h_eq : ∀ (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set Ω) (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i), ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
∀ i ∈ s, ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (f i)) = (μ⟦f i | m'⟧) ω := by
intros s f H
simp_rw [← Finset.mem_coe]
rw [ae_ball_iff (Finset.countable_toSet s)]
exact h_eq' s f H
have h_inter_eq : ∀ (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set Ω) (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
(fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (⋂ i ∈ s, f i)))
=ᵐ[μ] μ⟦⋂ i ∈ s, f i | m'⟧ := by
refine fun s f H ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' ?_
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (Finset.countable_toSet _) (fun i hi ↦ hπ i _ (H i hi))
refine ⟨fun h s f hf ↦ ?_, fun h s f hf ↦ ?_⟩ <;> specialize h s hf
· have h' := ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim h
filter_upwards [h_eq s f hf, h_inter_eq s f hf, h'] with ω h_eq h_inter_eq h'
rw [← h_inter_eq, h', ENNReal.toReal_prod, Finset.prod_apply]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h_eq
· refine ((stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel ?_).ae_eq_trim_iff hm' ?_).mpr ?_
· exact .biInter (Finset.countable_toSet _) (fun i hi ↦ hπ i _ (hf i hi))
· refine Measurable.stronglyMeasurable ?_
exact Finset.measurable_prod s (fun i hi ↦ measurable_condExpKernel (hπ i _ (hf i hi)))
filter_upwards [h_eq s f hf, h_inter_eq s f hf, h] with ω h_eq h_inter_eq h
have h_ne_top : condExpKernel μ m' ω (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) _)
have : (∏ i ∈ s, condExpKernel μ m' ω (f i)) ≠ ∞ :=
ENNReal.prod_ne_top fun _ _ ↦ measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) _
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h_ne_top, h_inter_eq, h, Finset.prod_apply,
← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal this, ENNReal.toReal_prod]
congr 1
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun i hi ↦ (h_eq i hi).symm)
lemma condIndepSets_iff (s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (hs1 : ∀ s ∈ s1, MeasurableSet s)
(hs2 : ∀ s ∈ s2, MeasurableSet s) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
CondIndepSets m' hm' s1 s2 μ ↔ ∀ (t1 t2 : Set Ω) (_ : t1 ∈ s1) (_ : t2 ∈ s2),
(μ⟦t1 ∩ t2 | m'⟧) =ᵐ[μ] (μ⟦t1 | m'⟧) * (μ⟦t2 | m'⟧) := by
simp only [CondIndepSets, Kernel.IndepSets]
have hs1_eq : ∀ s ∈ s1, (fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω s)) =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦s | m'⟧ :=
fun s hs ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' (hs1 s hs)
have hs2_eq : ∀ s ∈ s2, (fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω s)) =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦s | m'⟧ :=
fun s hs ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' (hs2 s hs)
have hs12_eq : ∀ s ∈ s1, ∀ t ∈ s2, (fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (s ∩ t)))
=ᵐ[μ] μ⟦s ∩ t | m'⟧ :=
fun s hs t ht ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' ((hs1 s hs).inter ((hs2 t ht)))
refine ⟨fun h s t hs ht ↦ ?_, fun h s t hs ht ↦ ?_⟩ <;> specialize h s t hs ht
· have h' := ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim h
filter_upwards [hs1_eq s hs, hs2_eq t ht, hs12_eq s hs t ht, h'] with ω hs_eq ht_eq hst_eq h'
rw [← hst_eq, Pi.mul_apply, ← hs_eq, ← ht_eq, h', ENNReal.toReal_mul]
· refine ((stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel ((hs1 s hs).inter (hs2 t ht))).ae_eq_trim_iff hm'
((measurable_condExpKernel (hs1 s hs)).mul
(measurable_condExpKernel (hs2 t ht))).stronglyMeasurable).mpr ?_
filter_upwards [hs1_eq s hs, hs2_eq t ht, hs12_eq s hs t ht, h] with ω hs_eq ht_eq hst_eq h
have h_ne_top : condExpKernel μ m' ω (s ∩ t) ≠ ∞ := measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) _
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h_ne_top, hst_eq, h, Pi.mul_apply, ← hs_eq, ← ht_eq,
← ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top (measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) s)
(measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) t)
lemma iCondIndepSets_singleton_iff (s : ι → Set Ω) (hπ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndepSets m' hm' (fun i ↦ {s i}) μ ↔ ∀ S : Finset ι,
μ⟦⋂ i ∈ S, s i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ S, (μ⟦s i | m'⟧) := by
rw [iCondIndepSets_iff]
· simp only [Set.mem_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨fun h S ↦ h S (fun i _ ↦ rfl), fun h S f hf ↦ ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h S] with a ha
refine Eq.trans ?_ (ha.trans ?_)
· congr
apply congr_arg₂
· exact Set.iInter₂_congr hf
· rfl
· simp_rw [Finset.prod_apply]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun i hi ↦ ?_)
rw [hf i hi]
· simpa only [Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
theorem condIndepSets_singleton_iff {μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s t : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
CondIndepSets m' hm' {s} {t} μ ↔ (μ⟦s ∩ t | m'⟧) =ᵐ[μ] (μ⟦s | m'⟧) * (μ⟦t | m'⟧) := by
rw [condIndepSets_iff _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_]
· simp only [Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq_apply_imp_iff, forall_eq]
· intros s' hs'
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hs'
rwa [hs']
· intros s' hs'
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hs'
rwa [hs']
lemma iCondIndep_iff_iCondIndepSets (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω)
(μ : @Measure Ω mΩ) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndep m' hm' m μ ↔ iCondIndepSets m' hm' (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) μ := by
simp only [iCondIndep, iCondIndepSets, Kernel.iIndep]
lemma iCondIndep_iff (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω) (hm : ∀ i, m i ≤ mΩ)
| (μ : @Measure Ω mΩ) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndep m' hm' m μ
↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → MeasurableSet[m i] (f i)),
μ⟦⋂ i ∈ s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, (μ⟦f i | m'⟧) := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Independence/Conditional.lean | 251 | 254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Hua. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Johan Commelin, Reid Barton, Robert Y. Lewis, Joseph Hua
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.IsTerminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
/-!
# Algebras of endofunctors
This file defines (co)algebras of an endofunctor, and provides the category instance for them.
It also defines the forgetful functor from the category of (co)algebras. It is shown that the
structure map of the initial algebra of an endofunctor is an isomorphism. Furthermore, it is shown
that for an adjunction `F ⊣ G` the category of algebras over `F` is equivalent to the category of
coalgebras over `G`.
## TODO
* Prove that if the countable infinite product over the powers of the endofunctor exists, then
algebras over the endofunctor coincide with algebras over the free monad on the endofunctor.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Endofunctor
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- An algebra of an endofunctor; `str` stands for "structure morphism" -/
structure Algebra (F : C ⥤ C) where
/-- carrier of the algebra -/
a : C
/-- structure morphism of the algebra -/
str : F.obj a ⟶ a
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Algebra (𝟭 C)) :=
⟨⟨default, 𝟙 _⟩⟩
namespace Algebra
variable {F : C ⥤ C} (A : Algebra F) {A₀ A₁ A₂ : Algebra F}
/-
```
str
F A₀ -----> A₀
| |
F f | | f
V V
F A₁ -----> A₁
str
```
-/
/-- A morphism between algebras of endofunctor `F` -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A₀ A₁ : Algebra F) where
/-- underlying morphism between the carriers -/
f : A₀.1 ⟶ A₁.1
/-- compatibility condition -/
h : F.map f ≫ A₁.str = A₀.str ≫ f := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.h
namespace Hom
/-- The identity morphism of an algebra of endofunctor `F` -/
def id : Hom A A where f := 𝟙 _
instance : Inhabited (Hom A A) :=
⟨{ f := 𝟙 _ }⟩
/-- The composition of morphisms between algebras of endofunctor `F` -/
def comp (f : Hom A₀ A₁) (g : Hom A₁ A₂) : Hom A₀ A₂ where f := f.1 ≫ g.1
end Hom
instance (F : C ⥤ C) : CategoryStruct (Algebra F) where
Hom := Hom
id := Hom.id
comp := @Hom.comp _ _ _
@[ext]
lemma ext {A B : Algebra F} {f g : A ⟶ B} (w : f.f = g.f := by aesop_cat) : f = g :=
Hom.ext w
@[simp]
theorem id_eq_id : Algebra.Hom.id A = 𝟙 A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_f : (𝟙 _ : A ⟶ A).1 = 𝟙 A.1 :=
rfl
variable (f : A₀ ⟶ A₁) (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq_comp : Algebra.Hom.comp f g = f ≫ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_f : (f ≫ g).1 = f.1 ≫ g.1 :=
rfl
/-- Algebras of an endofunctor `F` form a category -/
instance (F : C ⥤ C) : Category (Algebra F) := { }
/-- To construct an isomorphism of algebras, it suffices to give an isomorphism of the As which
commutes with the structure morphisms.
-/
@[simps!]
def isoMk (h : A₀.1 ≅ A₁.1) (w : F.map h.hom ≫ A₁.str = A₀.str ≫ h.hom := by aesop_cat) :
A₀ ≅ A₁ where
hom := { f := h.hom }
inv :=
{ f := h.inv
h := by
rw [h.eq_comp_inv, Category.assoc, ← w, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc]
simp }
/-- The forgetful functor from the category of algebras, forgetting the algebraic structure. -/
@[simps]
def forget (F : C ⥤ C) : Algebra F ⥤ C where
obj A := A.1
map := Hom.f
/-- An algebra morphism with an underlying isomorphism hom in `C` is an algebra isomorphism. -/
theorem iso_of_iso (f : A₀ ⟶ A₁) [IsIso f.1] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨{ f := inv f.1
h := by
rw [IsIso.eq_comp_inv f.1, Category.assoc, ← f.h]
simp }, by aesop_cat, by aesop_cat⟩⟩
instance forget_reflects_iso : (forget F).ReflectsIsomorphisms where reflects := iso_of_iso
instance forget_faithful : (forget F).Faithful := { }
/-- An algebra morphism with an underlying epimorphism hom in `C` is an algebra epimorphism. -/
theorem epi_of_epi {X Y : Algebra F} (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : Epi f.1] : Epi f :=
| (forget F).epi_of_epi_map h
/-- An algebra morphism with an underlying monomorphism hom in `C` is an algebra monomorphism. -/
theorem mono_of_mono {X Y : Algebra F} (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : Mono f.1] : Mono f :=
(forget F).mono_of_mono_map h
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Endofunctor/Algebra.lean | 144 | 148 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by
rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop]
· simpa only [finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulSupport_mulIndicator]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the value of `g` at the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `g (f i)` over `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an additive monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the
value of `g` at the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `g (f i)` over `s`."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem (f : α → M) (g : M →* N) (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_mem' (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod_mem (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_mem f hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod_mem f hs).symm
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` divided by the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` minus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f g : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) / ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mem_mul_distrib hs, finprod_mem_inv_distrib g hs]
/-!
### `∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x` and set operations
-/
/-- The product of any function over an empty set is `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of any function over an empty set is `0`."]
| theorem finprod_mem_empty : (∏ᶠ i ∈ (∅ : Set α), f i) = 1 := by simp
/-- A set `s` is nonempty if the product of some function over `s` is not equal to `1`. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 658 | 660 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Group
/-!
# Isomorphisms of `R`-algebras
This file defines bundled isomorphisms of `R`-algebras.
## Main definitions
* `AlgEquiv R A B`: the type of `R`-algebra isomorphisms between `A` and `B`.
## Notations
* `A ≃ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra equivalence from `A` to `B`.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
/-- An equivalence of algebras (denoted as `A ≃ₐ[R] B`)
is an equivalence of rings commuting with the actions of scalars. -/
structure AlgEquiv (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] extends A ≃ B, A ≃* B, A ≃+ B, A ≃+* B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
protected commutes' : ∀ r : R, toFun (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toAddEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toMulEquiv
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 A " ≃ₐ[" R "] " A' => AlgEquiv R A A'
/-- `AlgEquivClass F R A B` states that `F` is a type of algebra structure preserving
equivalences. You should extend this class when you extend `AlgEquiv`. -/
class AlgEquivClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] : Prop
extends RingEquivClass F A B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
namespace AlgEquivClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toAlgHomClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] :
AlgHomClass F R A B :=
{ h with }
instance (priority := 100) toLinearEquivClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
[Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] : LinearEquivClass F R A B :=
{ h with map_smulₛₗ := fun f => map_smulₛₗ f }
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AlgEquivClass F R A B` into an actual `AlgEquiv`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A ≃ₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgEquiv {F R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A]
[Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] (f : F) : A ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A ≃ B), (f : A ≃+* B) with commutes' := commutes f }
instance (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] : CoeTC F (A ≃ₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toAlgEquiv⟩
end AlgEquivClass
namespace AlgEquiv
universe uR uA₁ uA₂ uA₃ uA₁' uA₂' uA₃'
variable {R : Type uR}
variable {A₁ : Type uA₁} {A₂ : Type uA₂} {A₃ : Type uA₃}
variable {A₁' : Type uA₁'} {A₂' : Type uA₂'} {A₃' : Type uA₃'}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A₁] [Semiring A₂] [Semiring A₃]
variable [Semiring A₁'] [Semiring A₂'] [Semiring A₃']
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁'] [Algebra R A₂'] [Algebra R A₃']
variable (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
section coe
instance : EquivLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
obtain ⟨⟨f,_⟩,_⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨g,_⟩,_⟩ := g
congr
/-- Helper instance since the coercion is not always found. -/
instance : FunLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe := DFunLike.coe
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective'
instance : AlgEquivClass (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) R A₁ A₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
commutes f := f.commutes'
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
protected theorem congr_arg {f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} {x x' : A₁} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : f = g) (x : A₁) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {toEquiv map_mul map_add commutes} :
⇑(⟨toEquiv, map_mul, map_add, commutes⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = toEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨e, e', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = e :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem toEquiv_eq_coe : e.toEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_fun_injective : @Function.Injective (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ → A₂) fun e => (e : A₁ → A₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
instance hasCoeToRingEquiv : CoeOut (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
⟨AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃ A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toRingEquiv_eq_coe : e.toRingEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toRingEquiv_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ringEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ringEquiv' : (e.toRingEquiv : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ringEquiv_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| RingEquiv.congr_fun h
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as an algebra homomorphism.
This definition is included for symmetry with the other `to*Hom` projections.
The `simp` normal form is to use the coercion of the `AlgHomClass.coeTC` instance. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgHom : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ e with
map_one' := map_one e
map_zero' := map_zero e }
@[simp]
theorem toAlgHom_eq_coe : e.toAlgHom = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algHom : DFunLike.coe (e.toAlgHom) = DFunLike.coe e :=
rfl
theorem coe_algHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| AlgHom.congr_fun h
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toAlgHom_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
/-- The two paths coercion can take to a `RingHom` are equivalent -/
theorem coe_ringHom_commutes : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem commutes : ∀ r : R, e (algebraMap R A₁ r) = algebraMap R A₂ r :=
e.commutes'
end coe
section bijective
protected theorem bijective : Function.Bijective e :=
EquivLike.bijective e
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective e :=
EquivLike.injective e
protected theorem surjective : Function.Surjective e :=
EquivLike.surjective e
end bijective
section refl
/-- Algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
@[refl]
def refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ (.refl _ : A₁ ≃+* A₁) with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
instance : Inhabited (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_toAlgHom : ↑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgHom.id R A₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = id :=
rfl
end refl
section symm
/-- Algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ e.toRingEquiv.symm with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [← e.toRingEquiv.symm_apply_apply (algebraMap R A₁ r)]
congr
simp }
theorem invFun_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : e.invFun = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply_coe_coe_symm_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₂) :
f ((f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm x) = x :=
EquivLike.right_inv f x
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe_symm_apply_coe_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₁) :
(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm (f x) = x :=
EquivLike.left_inv f x
/-- `simp` normal form of `invFun_eq_symm` -/
@[simp]
theorem symm_toEquiv_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : (e : A₁ ≃ A₂).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe' (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, e, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = e.symm :=
symm_bijective.injective <| ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Auxiliary definition to avoid looping in `dsimp` with `AlgEquiv.symm_mk`. -/
protected def symm_mk.aux (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :=
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm =
{ symm_mk.aux f f' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ with
toFun := f'
invFun := f } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm : (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).symm = AlgEquiv.refl :=
rfl
--this should be a simp lemma but causes a lint timeout
theorem toRingEquiv_symm (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) : (f : A₁ ≃+* A₁).symm = f.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toRingEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toAddEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+ A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+ A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toMulEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃* A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply
theorem symm_apply_eq (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem eq_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
e.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ↑e.symm = AlgHom.id R A₂ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp ↑e.symm (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) = AlgHom.id R A₁ := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e :=
e.left_inv
theorem rightInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e :=
e.right_inv
end symm
section simps
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ → A₂ :=
e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.toEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ A₂ :=
e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ → A₁ :=
e.symm
initialize_simps_projections AlgEquiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
end simps
section trans
/-- Algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₃ :=
{ e₁.toRingEquiv.trans e₂.toRingEquiv with
commutes' := fun r => show e₂.toFun (e₁.toFun _) = _ by rw [e₁.commutes', e₂.commutes'] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : ⇑(e₁.trans e₂) = e₂ ∘ e₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₁) : (e₁.trans e₂) x = e₂ (e₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).symm x = e₁.symm (e₂.symm x) :=
rfl
end trans
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₁'` and `A₂` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂'`. -/
@[simps apply]
def arrowCongr (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ≃ (A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂') where
toFun f := (e₂.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.symm.toAlgHom
invFun f := (e₂.symm.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.toAlgHom
left_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, symm_comp]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, symm_comp, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
right_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, comp_symm]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, comp_symm, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
theorem arrowCongr_comp (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₃ : A₃ ≃ₐ[R] A₃') (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₃) :
arrowCongr e₁ e₃ (g.comp f) = (arrowCongr e₂ e₃ g).comp (arrowCongr e₁ e₂ f) := by
ext
simp only [arrowCongr, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, AlgHom.comp_apply]
congr
exact (e₂.symm_apply_apply _).symm
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_refl : arrowCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
arrowCongr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_symm (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
(arrowCongr e₁ e₂).symm = arrowCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₂` and `A₁'` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁'` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₂ ≃ ₐ[R] A₂'`.
This is the `AlgEquiv` version of `AlgEquiv.arrowCongr`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivCongr (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') ≃ A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂' where
toFun ψ := e.symm.trans (ψ.trans e')
invFun ψ := e.trans (ψ.trans e'.symm)
left_inv ψ := by
ext
simp_rw [trans_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv ψ := by
ext
simp_rw [trans_apply, apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_refl : equivCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
(equivCongr e e').symm = equivCongr e.symm e'.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_trans (e₁₂ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁₂' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂₃ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂₃' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
(equivCongr e₁₂ e₁₂').trans (equivCongr e₂₃ e₂₃') =
equivCongr (e₁₂.trans e₂₃) (e₁₂'.trans e₂₃') :=
rfl
/-- If an algebra morphism has an inverse, it is an algebra isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def ofAlgHom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ : f.comp g = AlgHom.id R A₂)
(h₂ : g.comp f = AlgHom.id R A₁) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ f with
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := AlgHom.ext_iff.1 h₂
right_inv := AlgHom.ext_iff.1 h₁ }
theorem coe_algHom_ofAlgHom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
↑(ofAlgHom f g h₁ h₂) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofAlgHom_coe_algHom (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
ofAlgHom (↑f) g h₁ h₂ = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem ofAlgHom_symm (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
(ofAlgHom f g h₁ h₂).symm = ofAlgHom g f h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
/-- Promotes a bijective algebra homomorphism to an algebra equivalence. -/
noncomputable def ofBijective (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (hf : Function.Bijective f) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ RingEquiv.ofBijective (f : A₁ →+* A₂) hf, f with }
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofBijective {f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂} {hf : Function.Bijective f} :
(AlgEquiv.ofBijective f hf : A₁ → A₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem ofBijective_apply {f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂} {hf : Function.Bijective f} (a : A₁) :
(AlgEquiv.ofBijective f hf) a = f a :=
rfl
/-- Forgetting the multiplicative structures, an equivalence of algebras is a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def toLinearEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂ :=
{ e with
toFun := e
map_smul' := map_smul e
invFun := e.symm }
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_refl : (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).toLinearEquiv = LinearEquiv.refl R A₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.toLinearEquiv.symm = e.symm.toLinearEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).toLinearEquiv = e₁.toLinearEquiv.trans e₂.toLinearEquiv :=
rfl
theorem toLinearEquiv_injective : Function.Injective (toLinearEquiv : _ → A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| LinearEquiv.congr_fun h
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as a linear map. -/
def toLinearMap : A₁ →ₗ[R] A₂ :=
e.toAlgHom.toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem toAlgHom_toLinearMap : (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂).toLinearMap = e.toLinearMap :=
rfl
theorem toLinearMap_ofAlgHom (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₁) (h₁ h₂) :
(ofAlgHom f g h₁ h₂).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_toLinearMap : e.toLinearEquiv.toLinearMap = e.toLinearMap :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearMap_apply (x : A₁) : e.toLinearMap x = e x :=
rfl
theorem toLinearMap_injective : Function.Injective (toLinearMap : _ → A₁ →ₗ[R] A₂) := fun _ _ h =>
ext <| LinearMap.congr_fun h
@[simp]
theorem trans_toLinearMap (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(f.trans g).toLinearMap = g.toLinearMap.comp f.toLinearMap :=
rfl
section OfLinearEquiv
variable (l : A₁ ≃ₗ[R] A₂) (map_one : l 1 = 1) (map_mul : ∀ x y : A₁, l (x * y) = l x * l y)
/--
Upgrade a linear equivalence to an algebra equivalence,
given that it distributes over multiplication and the identity
-/
@[simps apply]
def ofLinearEquiv : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ l with
toFun := l
invFun := l.symm
map_mul' := map_mul
commutes' := (AlgHom.ofLinearMap l map_one map_mul : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂).commutes }
/-- Auxiliary definition to avoid looping in `dsimp` with `AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv_symm`. -/
protected def ofLinearEquiv_symm.aux := (ofLinearEquiv l map_one map_mul).symm
@[simp]
theorem ofLinearEquiv_symm :
(ofLinearEquiv l map_one map_mul).symm =
ofLinearEquiv l.symm
(_root_.map_one <| ofLinearEquiv_symm.aux l map_one map_mul)
(_root_.map_mul <| ofLinearEquiv_symm.aux l map_one map_mul) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLinearEquiv_toLinearEquiv (map_mul) (map_one) :
ofLinearEquiv e.toLinearEquiv map_mul map_one = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv_ofLinearEquiv : toLinearEquiv (ofLinearEquiv l map_one map_mul) = l :=
rfl
end OfLinearEquiv
section OfRingEquiv
/-- Promotes a linear `RingEquiv` to an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply toEquiv]
def ofRingEquiv {f : A₁ ≃+* A₂} (hf : ∀ x, f (algebraMap R A₁ x) = algebraMap R A₂ x) :
A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ f with
toFun := f
invFun := f.symm
commutes' := hf }
end OfRingEquiv
@[simps -isSimp one mul, stacks 09HR]
instance aut : Group (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) where
mul ϕ ψ := ψ.trans ϕ
mul_assoc _ _ _ := rfl
one := refl
one_mul _ := ext fun _ => rfl
mul_one _ := ext fun _ => rfl
inv := symm
inv_mul_cancel ϕ := ext <| symm_apply_apply ϕ
@[simp]
theorem one_apply (x : A₁) : (1 : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) (x : A₁) : (e₁ * e₂) x = e₁ (e₂ x) :=
rfl
lemma aut_inv (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) : ϕ⁻¹ = ϕ.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_pow (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(e ^ n) = e^[n] :=
n.rec (by ext; simp) fun _ ih ↦ by ext; simp [pow_succ, ih]
/-- An algebra isomorphism induces a group isomorphism between automorphism groups.
This is a more bundled version of `AlgEquiv.equivCongr`. -/
@[simps apply]
def autCongr (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) ≃* A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂ where
__ := equivCongr ϕ ϕ
toFun ψ := ϕ.symm.trans (ψ.trans ϕ)
invFun ψ := ϕ.trans (ψ.trans ϕ.symm)
map_mul' ψ χ := by
ext
simp only [mul_apply, trans_apply, symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem autCongr_refl : autCongr AlgEquiv.refl = MulEquiv.refl (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem autCongr_symm (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (autCongr ϕ).symm = autCongr ϕ.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem autCongr_trans (ϕ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (ψ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(autCongr ϕ).trans (autCongr ψ) = autCongr (ϕ.trans ψ) :=
rfl
/-- The tautological action by `A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁` on `A₁`.
This generalizes `Function.End.applyMulAction`. -/
instance applyMulSemiringAction : MulSemiringAction (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ where
smul := (· <| ·)
smul_zero := map_zero
smul_add := map_add
smul_one := map_one
smul_mul := map_mul
one_smul _ := rfl
mul_smul _ _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem smul_def (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) (a : A₁) : f • a = f a :=
rfl
instance apply_faithfulSMul : FaithfulSMul (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ :=
⟨AlgEquiv.ext⟩
instance apply_smulCommClass {S} [SMul S R] [SMul S A₁] [IsScalarTower S R A₁] :
SMulCommClass S (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ where
smul_comm r e a := (e.toLinearEquiv.map_smul_of_tower r a).symm
instance apply_smulCommClass' {S} [SMul S R] [SMul S A₁] [IsScalarTower S R A₁] :
SMulCommClass (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) S A₁ :=
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
instance : MulDistribMulAction (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) A₁ˣ where
smul := fun f => Units.map f
one_smul := fun x => by ext; rfl
mul_smul := fun x y z => by ext; rfl
smul_mul := fun x y z => by ext; exact map_mul x _ _
smul_one := fun x => by ext; exact map_one x
@[simp]
theorem smul_units_def (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) (x : A₁ˣ) :
f • x = Units.map f x := rfl
|
@[simp]
lemma _root_.MulSemiringAction.toRingEquiv_algEquiv (σ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Equiv.lean | 672 | 674 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive (attr := simp) toReal_enorm]
lemma toReal_enorm' (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toReal = ‖x‖ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ofReal_norm]
lemma ofReal_norm' (x : E) : .ofReal ‖x‖ = ‖x‖ₑ := by
simp [enorm, ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal, nnnorm]
@[to_additive enorm_eq_iff_norm_eq]
theorem enorm'_eq_iff_norm_eq {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by congr⟩
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _) (norm_nonneg' _)).mp (ENNReal.coe_inj.mp h)
@[to_additive enorm_le_iff_norm_le]
theorem enorm'_le_iff_norm_le {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by gcongr⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _)] at h
exact h
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_right (a : E) : nndist a 1 = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma edist_one_right (a : E) : edist a 1 = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [edist_nndist, nndist_one_right, enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := NNReal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le]
lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ‖a ^ n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simpa [pow_succ, add_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le' norm_pow_le_mul_norm le_rfl
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le]
lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm {n : ℕ} : ‖a ^ n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ := by
simpa only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_natCast] using norm_pow_le_mul_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_abs_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_abs a n
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_natAbs_smul]
theorem nnnorm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_pow_natAbs a n
@[to_additive nnnorm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_isUnit a hn
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_left (a : E) : nndist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_one_left (a : E) : edist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_one_left]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma enorm_div_le : ‖a / b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add] using nnnorm_div_le a b
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
/-- An analogue of `nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add' (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add' _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
end NNNorm
section ENorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_zero]
lemma enorm_one' {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E] : ‖(1 : E)‖ₑ = 0 := by
rw [ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive exists_enorm_lt]
lemma exists_enorm_lt' (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
[hbot : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (1 : E))] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : ∃ x ≠ (1 : E), ‖x‖ₑ < c :=
frequently_iff_neBot.mpr hbot |>.and_eventually
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.tendsto' 1 0 (by simp) |>.eventually_lt_const hc.bot_lt)
|>.exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_neg]
lemma enorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
lemma ofReal_norm_eq_enorm' (a : E) : .ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ₑ := ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'
instance : ENorm ℝ≥0∞ where
enorm x := x
@[simp] lemma enorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0∞) : ‖x‖ₑ = x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_enorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖ₑ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub := edist_eq_enorm_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div := edist_eq_enorm_div
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_one_eq_enorm (x : E) : edist x 1 = ‖x‖ₑ := by rw [edist_eq_enorm_div, div_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm := edist_zero_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' := edist_one_eq_enorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball 1 r ↔ ‖a‖ₑ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_one_eq_enorm]
end ENorm
section ContinuousENorm
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousENorm E]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma continuous_enorm : Continuous fun a : E ↦ ‖a‖ₑ := ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → E} {s : Set X} {a : X}
| @[fun_prop]
lemma Continuous.enorm : Continuous f → Continuous (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
continuous_enorm.comp
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 904 | 906 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.LeftHomology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
/-!
# Right Homology of short complexes
In this file, we define the dual notions to those defined in
`Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.LeftHomology`. In particular, if `S : ShortComplex C` is
a short complex consisting of two composable maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such
that `f ≫ g = 0`, we define `h : S.RightHomologyData` to be the datum of morphisms
`p : X₂ ⟶ Q` and `ι : H ⟶ Q` such that `Q` identifies to the cokernel of `f` and `H`
to the kernel of the induced map `g' : Q ⟶ X₃`.
When such a `S.RightHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasRightHomology]`
and we define `S.rightHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen right homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.opcycles` to be the `Q` field.
In `Homology.lean`, when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data
(i.e. they give the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define
`[S.HasHomology]` and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q` and
`ι : H ⟶ Q` such that `p` identifies `Q` to the kernel of `f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`,
and that `ι` identifies `H` to the kernel of the induced map `g' : Q ⟶ S.X₃` -/
structure RightHomologyData where
/-- a choice of cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` -/
Q : C
/-- a choice of kernel of the induced morphism `S.g' : S.Q ⟶ X₃` -/
H : C
/-- the projection from `S.X₂` -/
p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q
/-- the inclusion of the (right) homology in the chosen cokernel of `S.f` -/
ι : H ⟶ Q
/-- the cokernel condition for `p` -/
wp : S.f ≫ p = 0
/-- `p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` -/
hp : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ p wp)
/-- the kernel condition for `ι` -/
wι : ι ≫ hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ _ S.zero) = 0
/-- `ι : H ⟶ Q` is a kernel of `S.g' : Q ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hι : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι ι wι)
initialize_simps_projections RightHomologyData (-hp, -hι)
namespace RightHomologyData
/-- The chosen cokernels and kernels of the limits API give a `RightHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel
[HasCokernel S.f] [HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.RightHomologyData :=
{ Q := cokernel S.f,
H := kernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero),
p := cokernel.π _,
ι := kernel.ι _,
wp := cokernel.condition _,
hp := cokernelIsCokernel _,
wι := kernel.condition _,
hι := kernelIsKernel _, }
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wp wι
variable {S}
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Epi h.p := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hp⟩
instance : Mono h.ι := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hι⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : S.X₂ ⟶ A` such that `S.f ≫ k = 0` descends
to a morphism `Q ⟶ A` -/
def descQ (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.Q ⟶ A :=
h.hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_descQ (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.p ≫ h.descQ k hk = k :=
h.hp.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.one
/-- The morphism from the (right) homology attached to a morphism
`k : S.X₂ ⟶ A` such that `S.f ≫ k = 0`. -/
@[simp]
def descH (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.ι ≫ h.descQ k hk
/-- The morphism `h.Q ⟶ S.X₃` induced by `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` and the fact that
`h.Q` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
def g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃ := h.descQ S.g S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma p_g' : h.p ≫ h.g' = S.g := p_descQ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma ι_g' : h.ι ≫ h.g' = 0 := h.wι
@[reassoc]
lemma ι_descQ_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (x : S.X₃ ⟶ A) (hx : k = S.g ≫ x) :
h.ι ≫ h.descQ k (by rw [hx, S.zero_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = h.ι ≫ h.g' ≫ x by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_epi h.p, hx, p_descQ, p_g'_assoc]
/-- For `h : S.RightHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hι`, saying that
`ι : h.H ⟶ h.Q` is a kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def hι' : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι h.ι h.ι_g') := h.hι
/-- The morphism `A ⟶ H` induced by a morphism `k : A ⟶ Q` such that `k ≫ g' = 0` -/
def liftH (k : A ⟶ h.Q) (hk : k ≫ h.g' = 0) : A ⟶ h.H :=
h.hι.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftH_ι (k : A ⟶ h.Q) (hk : k ≫ h.g' = 0) : h.liftH k hk ≫ h.ι = k :=
h.hι.fac (KernelFork.ofι k hk) WalkingParallelPair.zero
lemma isIso_p (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.p :=
⟨h.descQ (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hf, comp_id]), p_descQ _ _ _, by
simp only [← cancel_epi h.p, p_descQ_assoc, id_comp, comp_id]⟩
lemma isIso_ι (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.ι := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' h.hι' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_epi h.p, id_comp, p_g', comp_zero, hg])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, by rw [← cancel_mono h.ι, assoc, hφ, comp_id, id_comp], hφ⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := S.X₂
H := c.pt
p := 𝟙 _
ι := c.ι
wp := by rw [comp_id, hf]
hp := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
wι := KernelFork.condition _
hι := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_g' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g)
(hc : IsLimit c) : (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).g' = S.g := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).p, p_g',
ofIsLimitKernelFork_p, id_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.RightHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := c.pt
H := c.pt
p := c.π
ι := 𝟙 _
wp := CokernelCofork.condition _
hp := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wι := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simp [hg])
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ (Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simp [hg]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_g' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).g' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).p, p_g', hg, comp_zero]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.RightHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂`
gives a right homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.RightHomologyData where
Q := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
p := 𝟙 _
ι := 𝟙 _
wp := by rw [comp_id, hf]
hp := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
wι := by
change 𝟙 _ ≫ S.g = 0
simp only [hg, comp_zero]
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
@[simp]
lemma ofZeros_g' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).g' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi ((ofZeros S hf hg).p), comp_zero, p_g', hg]
end RightHomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has right homology when there exists a `S.RightHomologyData` -/
class HasRightHomology : Prop where
condition : Nonempty S.RightHomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.RightHomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has right homology -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyData [HasRightHomology S] :
S.RightHomologyData := HasRightHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
namespace HasRightHomology
lemma mk' (h : S.RightHomologyData) : HasRightHomology S := ⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance of_hasCokernel_of_hasKernel
[HasCokernel S.f] [HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.HasRightHomology := HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
instance of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
end HasRightHomology
namespace RightHomologyData
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` induces a left homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.RightHomologyData) : S.op.LeftHomologyData where
K := Opposite.op h.Q
H := Opposite.op h.H
i := h.p.op
π := h.ι.op
wi := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wp
hi := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ h.hp
wπ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wι
hπ := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ h.hι
@[simp] lemma op_f' (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.op.f' = h.g'.op := rfl
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a left homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.RightHomologyData) : S.unop.LeftHomologyData where
K := Opposite.unop h.Q
H := Opposite.unop h.H
i := h.p.unop
π := h.ι.unop
wi := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wp
hi := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπUnop _ _ h.hp
wπ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wι
hπ := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιUnop _ _ h.hι
@[simp] lemma unop_f' {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.unop.f' = h.g'.unop := rfl
end RightHomologyData
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` induces a right homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : S.op.RightHomologyData where
Q := Opposite.op h.K
H := Opposite.op h.H
p := h.i.op
ι := h.π.op
wp := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wi
hp := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ h.hi
wι := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wπ
hι := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ h.hπ
@[simp] lemma op_g' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.op.g' = h.f'.op := rfl
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a right homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : S.unop.RightHomologyData where
Q := Opposite.unop h.K
H := Opposite.unop h.H
p := h.i.unop
ι := h.π.unop
wp := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wi
hp := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιUnop _ _ h.hi
wι := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wπ
hι := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπUnop _ _ h.hπ
@[simp] lemma unop_g' {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.unop.g' = h.f'.unop := rfl
end LeftHomologyData
instance [S.HasLeftHomology] : HasRightHomology S.op :=
HasRightHomology.mk' S.leftHomologyData.op
instance [S.HasRightHomology] : HasLeftHomology S.op :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' S.rightHomologyData.op
lemma hasLeftHomology_iff_op (S : ShortComplex C) :
S.HasLeftHomology ↔ S.op.HasRightHomology :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => HasLeftHomology.mk' S.op.rightHomologyData.unop⟩
lemma hasRightHomology_iff_op (S : ShortComplex C) :
S.HasRightHomology ↔ S.op.HasLeftHomology :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => HasRightHomology.mk' S.op.leftHomologyData.unop⟩
lemma hasLeftHomology_iff_unop (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) :
S.HasLeftHomology ↔ S.unop.HasRightHomology :=
S.unop.hasRightHomology_iff_op.symm
lemma hasRightHomology_iff_unop (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) :
S.HasRightHomology ↔ S.unop.HasLeftHomology :=
S.unop.hasLeftHomology_iff_op.symm
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
/-- Given right homology data `h₁` and `h₂` for two short complexes `S₁` and `S₂`,
a `RightHomologyMapData` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
consists of a description of the induced morphisms on the `Q` (opcycles)
and `H` (right homology) fields of `h₁` and `h₂`. -/
structure RightHomologyMapData where
/-- the induced map on opcycles -/
φQ : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q
/-- the induced map on right homology -/
φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H
/-- commutation with `p` -/
commp : h₁.p ≫ φQ = φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `g'` -/
commg' : φQ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `ι` -/
commι : φH ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.ι ≫ φQ := by aesop_cat
namespace RightHomologyMapData
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] commp commg' commι
/-- The right homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
RightHomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
φQ := 0
φH := 0
/-- The right homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.RightHomologyData) : RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of right homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : RightHomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
RightHomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
φQ := ψ.φQ ≫ ψ'.φQ
φH := ψ.φH ≫ ψ'.φH
instance : Subsingleton (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨fun ψ₁ ψ₂ => by
have hQ : ψ₁.φQ = ψ₂.φQ := by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.p, commp, commp]
have hH : ψ₁.φH = ψ₂.φH := by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.ι, commι, commι, hQ]
cases ψ₁
cases ψ₂
congr⟩
instance : Inhabited (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
let φQ : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q := h₁.descQ (φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p) (by rw [← φ.comm₁₂_assoc, h₂.wp, comp_zero])
have commg' : φQ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
rw [← cancel_epi h₁.p, RightHomologyData.p_descQ_assoc, assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g', φ.comm₂₃, RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc]
let φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := h₂.liftH (h₁.ι ≫ φQ)
(by rw [assoc, commg', RightHomologyData.ι_g'_assoc, zero_comp])
exact ⟨φQ, φH, by simp [φQ], commg', by simp [φH]⟩⟩
instance : Unique (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φH = γ₂.φH := by rw [eq]
lemma congr_φQ {γ₁ γ₂ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φQ = γ₂.φQ := by rw [eq]
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on right homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
φQ := φ.τ₂
φH := φ.τ₂
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on right homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φQ := φ.τ₂
φH := f
commg' := by simp only [RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork_g', φ.comm₂₃]
commι := comm.symm
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on right homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φQ := f
φH := f
commp := comm.symm
variable (S)
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the right homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the right homology data
`RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := c.ι
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the right homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the right homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
φQ := c.π
φH := c.π
end RightHomologyMapData
end
section
variable (S)
variable [S.HasRightHomology]
/-- The right homology of a short complex,
given by the `H` field of a chosen right homology data. -/
noncomputable def rightHomology : C := S.rightHomologyData.H
-- `S.rightHomology` is the simp normal form.
@[simp] lemma rightHomologyData_H : S.rightHomologyData.H = S.rightHomology := rfl
/-- The "opcycles" of a short complex, given by the `Q` field of a chosen right homology data.
This is the dual notion to cycles. -/
noncomputable def opcycles : C := S.rightHomologyData.Q
/-- The canonical map `S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyι : S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.ι
/-- The projection `S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def pOpcycles : S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles := S.rightHomologyData.p
/-- The canonical map `S.opcycles ⟶ X₃`. -/
noncomputable def fromOpcycles : S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃ := S.rightHomologyData.g'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma f_pOpcycles : S.f ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 := S.rightHomologyData.wp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_fromOpcycles : S.pOpcycles ≫ S.fromOpcycles = S.g := S.rightHomologyData.p_g'
instance : Epi S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp only [pOpcycles]
infer_instance
instance : Mono S.rightHomologyι := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyι]
infer_instance
lemma rightHomology_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.rightHomology) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ f₁ ≫ S.rightHomologyι = f₂ ≫ S.rightHomologyι := by
rw [cancel_mono]
@[ext]
lemma rightHomology_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.rightHomology)
(h : f₁ ≫ S.rightHomologyι = f₂ ≫ S.rightHomologyι) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [rightHomology_ext_iff]
lemma opcycles_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.opcycles ⟶ A) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ S.pOpcycles ≫ f₁ = S.pOpcycles ≫ f₂ := by
rw [cancel_epi]
@[ext]
lemma opcycles_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.opcycles ⟶ A)
(h : S.pOpcycles ≫ f₁ = S.pOpcycles ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [opcycles_ext_iff]
lemma isIso_pOpcycles (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso S.pOpcycles :=
RightHomologyData.isIso_p _ hf
/-- When `S.f = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ S.X₂`
induced by `S.pOpcycles`. -/
@[simps! inv]
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoX₂ (hf : S.f = 0) : S.opcycles ≅ S.X₂ := by
have := S.isIso_pOpcycles hf
exact (asIso S.pOpcycles).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoX₂_inv_hom_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.pOpcycles ≫ (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom = 𝟙 _ := (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoX₂_hom_inv_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
(S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom ≫ S.pOpcycles = 𝟙 _ := (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom_inv_id
lemma isIso_rightHomologyι (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso S.rightHomologyι :=
RightHomologyData.isIso_ι _ hg
/-- When `S.g = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ S.rightHomology` induced
by `S.rightHomologyι`. -/
@[simps! inv]
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoRightHomology (hg : S.g = 0) : S.opcycles ≅ S.rightHomology := by
have := S.isIso_rightHomologyι hg
exact (asIso S.rightHomologyι).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoRightHomology_inv_hom_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.rightHomologyι ≫ (S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoRightHomology_hom_inv_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom ≫ S.rightHomologyι = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom_inv_id
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
/-- The (unique) right homology map data associated to a morphism of short complexes that
are both equipped with right homology data. -/
def rightHomologyMapData : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and right homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced right homology map `h₁.H ⟶ h₁.H`. -/
def rightHomologyMap' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := (rightHomologyMapData φ _ _).φH
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and right homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced morphism `h₁.K ⟶ h₁.K` on opcycles. -/
def opcyclesMap' : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q := (rightHomologyMapData φ _ _).φQ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap' : h₁.p ≫ opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p :=
RightHomologyMapData.commp _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesMap'_g' : opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h₁.p, assoc, φ.comm₂₃, p_opcyclesMap'_assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc, RightHomologyData.p_g']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyι_naturality' :
rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.ι ≫ opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ :=
RightHomologyMapData.commι _
end
section
variable [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- The (right) homology map `S₁.rightHomology ⟶ S₂.rightHomology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyMap : S₁.rightHomology ⟶ S₂.rightHomology :=
rightHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The morphism `S₁.opcycles ⟶ S₂.opcycles` induced by a morphism `S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesMap : S₁.opcycles ⟶ S₂.opcycles :=
opcyclesMap' φ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap : S₁.pOpcycles ≫ opcyclesMap φ = φ.τ₂ ≫ S₂.pOpcycles :=
p_opcyclesMap' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_naturality : opcyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.fromOpcycles = S₁.fromOpcycles ≫ φ.τ₃ :=
opcyclesMap'_g' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyι_naturality :
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ S₂.rightHomologyι = S₁.rightHomologyι ≫ opcyclesMap φ :=
rightHomologyι_naturality' _ _ _
end
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma rightHomologyMap'_eq : rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φH :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma opcyclesMap'_eq : opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φQ :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φQ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end RightHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_id (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(RightHomologyMapData.id h).rightHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_id (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(RightHomologyMapData.id h).opcyclesMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_id [HasRightHomology S] :
rightHomologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
rightHomologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_id [HasRightHomology S] :
opcyclesMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
opcyclesMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).rightHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).opcyclesMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_zero [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] :
rightHomologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
rightHomologyMap'_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_zero [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] :
opcyclesMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
opcyclesMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = rightHomologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
rightHomologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := rightHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.rightHomologyMap'_eq, γ₂.rightHomologyMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).rightHomologyMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.comp_φH]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = opcyclesMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫ opcyclesMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := rightHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.opcyclesMap'_eq, γ₂.opcyclesMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).opcyclesMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.comp_φQ]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_comp [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] [HasRightHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
rightHomologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = rightHomologyMap φ₁ ≫ rightHomologyMap φ₂ :=
rightHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] [HasRightHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
opcyclesMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = opcyclesMap φ₁ ≫ opcyclesMap φ₂ :=
opcyclesMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
attribute [simp] rightHomologyMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `H` fields
of right homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def rightHomologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) : h₁.H ≅ h₂.H where
hom := rightHomologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := rightHomologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, rightHomologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, rightHomologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_rightHomologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (rightHomologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `Q` fields
of right homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def opcyclesMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) : h₁.Q ≅ h₂.Q where
hom := opcyclesMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := opcyclesMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, opcyclesMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, opcyclesMap'_id]
instance isIso_opcyclesMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (opcyclesMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.rightHomology ≅ S₂.rightHomology` induced by an isomorphism of
short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : S₁.rightHomology ≅ S₂.rightHomology where
hom := rightHomologyMap e.hom
inv := rightHomologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, rightHomologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, rightHomologyMap_id]
instance isIso_rightHomologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (rightHomologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.opcycles ≅ S₂.opcycles` induced by an isomorphism
of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : S₁.opcycles ≅ S₂.opcycles where
hom := opcyclesMap e.hom
inv := opcyclesMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, opcyclesMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, opcyclesMap_id]
instance isIso_opcyclesMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : IsIso (opcyclesMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (opcyclesMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
namespace RightHomologyData
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) [S.HasRightHomology]
/-- The isomorphism `S.rightHomology ≅ h.H` induced by a right homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyIso : S.rightHomology ≅ h.H :=
rightHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- The isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ h.Q` induced by a right homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIso : S.opcycles ≅ h.Q :=
opcyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv : h.p ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv = S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp [pOpcycles, RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso]
simp only [p_opcyclesMap', id_τ₂, id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcycles_comp_opcyclesIso_hom : S.pOpcycles ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom = h.p := by
simp only [← h.p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι :
h.rightHomologyIso.inv ≫ S.rightHomologyι = h.ι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyι, rightHomologyIso, opcyclesIso, rightHomologyMapIso',
opcyclesMapIso', Iso.refl]
rw [rightHomologyι_naturality']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_ι :
h.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ h.ι = S.rightHomologyι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h.opcyclesIso.inv, ← cancel_epi h.rightHomologyIso.inv,
assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι]
end RightHomologyData
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma rightHomologyMap_eq [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
rightHomologyMap φ = h₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso, rightHomologyMapIso']
rw [← γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, ← rightHomologyMap'_comp,
← rightHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma opcyclesMap_eq [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
opcyclesMap φ = h₁.opcyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φQ ≫ h₂.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp [RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso, cyclesMapIso']
rw [← γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, ← opcyclesMap'_comp, ← opcyclesMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma rightHomologyMap_comm [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.hom = h₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
simp only [γ.rightHomologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
lemma opcyclesMap_comm [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
opcyclesMap φ ≫ h₂.opcyclesIso.hom = h₁.opcyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φQ := by
simp only [γ.opcyclesMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end RightHomologyMapData
section
variable (C)
variable [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C]
/-- The right homology functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C`, where the right homology of a
short complex `S` is understood as a kernel of the obvious map `S.fromOpcycles : S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃`
where `S.opcycles` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyFunctor : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.rightHomology
map := rightHomologyMap
/-- The opcycles functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C` which sends a short complex `S` to `S.opcycles`
which is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesFunctor :
ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.opcycles
map := opcyclesMap
/-- The natural transformation `S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyιNatTrans :
rightHomologyFunctor C ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C where
app S := rightHomologyι S
naturality := fun _ _ φ => rightHomologyι_naturality φ
/-- The natural transformation `S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def pOpcyclesNatTrans :
ShortComplex.π₂ ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C where
app S := S.pOpcycles
/-- The natural transformation `S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def fromOpcyclesNatTrans :
opcyclesFunctor C ⟶ π₃ where
app S := S.fromOpcycles
naturality := fun _ _ φ => fromOpcycles_naturality φ
end
/-- A left homology map data for a morphism of short complexes induces
a right homology map data in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def LeftHomologyMapData.op {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : RightHomologyMapData (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op where
φQ := ψ.φK.op
φH := ψ.φH.op
commp := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commg' := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commι := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
/-- A left homology map data for a morphism of short complexes in the opposite category
induces a right homology map data in the original category. -/
@[simps]
def LeftHomologyMapData.unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : RightHomologyMapData (unopMap φ) h₂.unop h₁.unop where
φQ := ψ.φK.unop
φH := ψ.φH.unop
commp := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commg' := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commι := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
/-- A right homology map data for a morphism of short complexes induces
a left homology map data in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def RightHomologyMapData.op {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : LeftHomologyMapData (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op where
φK := ψ.φQ.op
φH := ψ.φH.op
commi := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commf' := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commπ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
/-- A right homology map data for a morphism of short complexes in the opposite category
induces a left homology map data in the original category. -/
@[simps]
def RightHomologyMapData.unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : LeftHomologyMapData (unopMap φ) h₂.unop h₁.unop where
φK := ψ.φQ.unop
φH := ψ.φH.unop
commi := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commf' := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commπ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
variable (S)
/-- The right homology in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the left homology of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyOpIso [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.op.rightHomology ≅ Opposite.op S.leftHomology :=
S.leftHomologyData.op.rightHomologyIso
/-- The left homology in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the right homology of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyOpIso [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.op.leftHomology ≅ Opposite.op S.rightHomology :=
S.rightHomologyData.op.leftHomologyIso
/-- The opcycles in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the cycles of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesOpIso [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.op.opcycles ≅ Opposite.op S.cycles :=
S.leftHomologyData.op.opcyclesIso
/-- The cycles in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the opcycles of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def cyclesOpIso [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.op.cycles ≅ Opposite.op S.opcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.op.cyclesIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesOpIso_hom_toCycles_op [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.opcyclesOpIso.hom ≫ S.toCycles.op = S.op.fromOpcycles := by
dsimp [opcyclesOpIso, toCycles]
rw [← cancel_epi S.op.pOpcycles, p_fromOpcycles,
RightHomologyData.pOpcycles_comp_opcyclesIso_hom_assoc,
LeftHomologyData.op_p, ← op_comp, LeftHomologyData.f'_i, op_g]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_op_cyclesOpIso_inv [S.HasRightHomology]:
S.fromOpcycles.op ≫ S.cyclesOpIso.inv = S.op.toCycles := by
dsimp [cyclesOpIso, fromOpcycles]
rw [← cancel_mono S.op.iCycles, assoc, toCycles_i,
LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso_inv_comp_iCycles, RightHomologyData.op_i,
← op_comp, RightHomologyData.p_g', op_f]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma op_pOpcycles_opcyclesOpIso_hom [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.op.pOpcycles ≫ S.opcyclesOpIso.hom = S.iCycles.op := by
dsimp [opcyclesOpIso]
rw [← S.leftHomologyData.op.p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesOpIso_inv_op_iCycles [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.cyclesOpIso.inv ≫ S.op.iCycles = S.pOpcycles.op := by
dsimp [cyclesOpIso]
rw [← S.rightHomologyData.op.cyclesIso_hom_comp_i, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesOpIso_hom_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
opcyclesMap (opMap φ) ≫ (S₁.opcyclesOpIso).hom =
S₂.opcyclesOpIso.hom ≫ (cyclesMap φ).op := by
rw [← cancel_epi S₂.op.pOpcycles, p_opcyclesMap_assoc, opMap_τ₂,
op_pOpcycles_opcyclesOpIso_hom, op_pOpcycles_opcyclesOpIso_hom_assoc, ← op_comp,
← op_comp, cyclesMap_i]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesOpIso_inv_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
(cyclesMap φ).op ≫ (S₁.opcyclesOpIso).inv =
S₂.opcyclesOpIso.inv ≫ opcyclesMap (opMap φ) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (S₂.opcyclesOpIso.hom), Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
← opcyclesOpIso_hom_naturality_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesOpIso_inv_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
(opcyclesMap φ).op ≫ (S₁.cyclesOpIso).inv =
S₂.cyclesOpIso.inv ≫ cyclesMap (opMap φ) := by
rw [← cancel_mono S₁.op.iCycles, assoc, assoc, cyclesOpIso_inv_op_iCycles, cyclesMap_i,
cyclesOpIso_inv_op_iCycles_assoc, ← op_comp, p_opcyclesMap, op_comp, opMap_τ₂]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesOpIso_hom_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
cyclesMap (opMap φ) ≫ (S₁.cyclesOpIso).hom =
S₂.cyclesOpIso.hom ≫ (opcyclesMap φ).op := by
rw [← cancel_mono (S₁.cyclesOpIso).inv, assoc, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id,
cyclesOpIso_inv_naturality, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_op
(φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
(leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂).op = rightHomologyMap' (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op := by
let γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂
simp only [γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ.op.rightHomologyMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.op_φH]
lemma leftHomologyMap_op (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
(leftHomologyMap φ).op = S₂.rightHomologyOpIso.inv ≫ rightHomologyMap (opMap φ) ≫
S₁.rightHomologyOpIso.hom := by
dsimp [rightHomologyOpIso, RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso, rightHomologyMap,
leftHomologyMap]
simp only [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id, id_comp, leftHomologyMap'_op]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_op
(φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
(rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂).op = leftHomologyMap' (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op := by
let γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂
simp only [γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, γ.op.leftHomologyMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.op_φH]
lemma rightHomologyMap_op (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
(rightHomologyMap φ).op = S₂.leftHomologyOpIso.inv ≫ leftHomologyMap (opMap φ) ≫
S₁.leftHomologyOpIso.hom := by
dsimp [leftHomologyOpIso, LeftHomologyData.leftHomologyIso, leftHomologyMap,
rightHomologyMap]
simp only [← leftHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id, id_comp, rightHomologyMap'_op]
namespace RightHomologyData
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : RightHomologyData S₁) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃]
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a right homology data for `S₁` induces a right homology data for `S₂` with
the same `Q` and `H` fields. This is obtained by dualising `LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'`.
The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'`. -/
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono : RightHomologyData S₂ := by
haveI : Epi (opMap φ).τ₁ := by dsimp; infer_instance
haveI : IsIso (opMap φ).τ₂ := by dsimp; infer_instance
haveI : Mono (opMap φ).τ₃ := by dsimp; infer_instance
exact (LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' (opMap φ) h.op).unop
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono_Q : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h).Q = h.Q := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono_H : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h).H = h.H := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono_p : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h).p = inv φ.τ₂ ≫ h.p := by
simp [ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono, opMap]
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono_ι : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h).ι = h.ι := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono_g' : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h).g' = h.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
simp [ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono, opMap]
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : RightHomologyData S₂) [Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃]
/-- If `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is a morphism of short complexes such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then a right homology data for `S₂` induces a right homology data for `S₁` with
the same `Q` and `H` fields. This is obtained by dualising `LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono`.
The inverse construction is `ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono`. -/
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' : RightHomologyData S₁ := by
haveI : Epi (opMap φ).τ₁ := by dsimp; infer_instance
haveI : IsIso (opMap φ).τ₂ := by dsimp; infer_instance
haveI : Mono (opMap φ).τ₃ := by dsimp; infer_instance
exact (LeftHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (opMap φ) h.op).unop
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'_Q : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h).Q = h.Q := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'_H : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h).H = h.H := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'_p : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h).p = φ.τ₂ ≫ h.p := by
simp [ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono', opMap]
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'_ι : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h).ι = h.ι := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'_g'_τ₃ : (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h).g' ≫ φ.τ₃ = h.g' := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h).p, p_g'_assoc, ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'_p,
assoc, p_g', φ.comm₂₃]
end
/-- If `e : S₁ ≅ S₂` is an isomorphism of short complexes and `h₁ : RightomologyData S₁`,
this is the right homology data for `S₂` deduced from the isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def ofIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : RightHomologyData S₁) : RightHomologyData S₂ :=
h₁.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono e.hom
end RightHomologyData
lemma hasRightHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasRightHomology S₁]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HasRightHomology S₂ :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ S₁.rightHomologyData)
lemma hasRightHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [HasRightHomology S₂]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] : HasRightHomology S₁ :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ S₂.rightHomologyData)
lemma hasRightHomology_of_iso {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
(e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [HasRightHomology S₁] : HasRightHomology S₂ :=
hasRightHomology_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono e.hom
namespace RightHomologyMapData
/-- This right homology map data expresses compatibilities of the right homology data
constructed by `RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono` -/
@[simps]
def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : RightHomologyData S₁)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
RightHomologyMapData φ h (RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h) where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- This right homology map data expresses compatibilities of the right homology data
constructed by `RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono'` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h : RightHomologyData S₂)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono' φ h) h where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
end RightHomologyMapData
instance (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) := by
let h₂' := RightHomologyData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁
haveI : IsIso (rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂') := by
rw [(RightHomologyMapData.ofEpiOfIsIsoOfMono φ h₁).rightHomologyMap'_eq]
dsimp
infer_instance
have eq := rightHomologyMap'_comp φ (𝟙 S₂) h₁ h₂' h₂
rw [comp_id] at eq
rw [eq]
infer_instance
/-- If a morphism of short complexes `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is such that `φ.τ₁` is epi, `φ.τ₂` is an iso,
and `φ.τ₃` is mono, then the induced morphism on right homology is an isomorphism. -/
instance (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology]
[Epi φ.τ₁] [IsIso φ.τ₂] [Mono φ.τ₃] :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap φ) := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyMap]
infer_instance
variable (C)
section
variable [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C] [HasKernels Cᵒᵖ] [HasCokernels Cᵒᵖ]
/-- The opposite of the right homology functor is the left homology functor. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def rightHomologyFunctorOpNatIso :
(rightHomologyFunctor C).op ≅ opFunctor C ⋙ leftHomologyFunctor Cᵒᵖ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun S => (leftHomologyOpIso S.unop).symm)
(by simp [rightHomologyMap_op])
/-- The opposite of the left homology functor is the right homology functor. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def leftHomologyFunctorOpNatIso :
(leftHomologyFunctor C).op ≅ opFunctor C ⋙ rightHomologyFunctor Cᵒᵖ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun S => (rightHomologyOpIso S.unop).symm)
(by simp [leftHomologyMap_op])
end
| section
variable {C}
variable (h : RightHomologyData S) {A : C}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/RightHomology.lean | 1,207 | 1,210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
Disjoint π₁.boxes π₂.boxes :=
Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J h₁ h₂ =>
Disjoint.le_bot (h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)) ⟨J.upper_mem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset :
π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔
(∀ J ∈ π₁, ∀ J' ∈ π₂, (J ∩ J' : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty → J ≤ J') ∧ π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := by
constructor
· refine fun H => ⟨fun J hJ J' hJ' Hne => ?_, iUnion_mono H⟩
rcases H hJ with ⟨J'', hJ'', Hle⟩
rcases Hne with ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
rwa [π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ' hJ'' hx' (Hle hx)]
· rintro ⟨H, HU⟩ J hJ
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_iUnion] at HU
rcases HU J.upper ⟨J, hJ, J.upper_mem⟩ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hx⟩
exact ⟨J₂, hJ₂, H _ hJ _ hJ₂ ⟨_, J.upper_mem, hx⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (h₁ : π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes) (h₂ : π₂.iUnion ⊆ π₁.iUnion) :
π₁ = π₂ :=
le_antisymm (fun J hJ => ⟨J, h₁ hJ, le_rfl⟩) <|
le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset.2
⟨fun _ hJ₁ _ hJ₂ Hne =>
(π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ (h₁ hJ₂) Hne.choose_spec.1 Hne.choose_spec.2).le, h₂⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a prepartition `π` of a box `I` and a collection of prepartitions `πi J` of all boxes
`J ∈ π`, returns the prepartition of `I` into the union of the boxes of all `πi J`.
Though we only use the values of `πi` on the boxes of `π`, we require `πi` to be a globally defined
function. -/
@[simps]
def biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_boxes] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩
exact ((πi J').le_of_mem hJ).trans (π.le_of_mem hJ')
pairwiseDisjoint := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro J₁' ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₁'⟩ J₂' ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₂'⟩ Hne
rw [Function.onFun, Set.disjoint_left]
rintro x hx₁ hx₂; apply Hne
obtain rfl : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem hJ₁' hx₁) ((πi J₂).le_of_mem hJ₂' hx₂)
exact (πi J₁).eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁' hJ₂' hx₁ hx₂
variable {πi πi₁ πi₂ : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J}
@[simp]
theorem mem_biUnion : J ∈ π.biUnion πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J' := by simp [biUnion]
theorem biUnion_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) : π.biUnion πi ≤ π := fun _ hJ =>
let ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩ := π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ
⟨J', hJ', (πi J').le_of_mem hJ⟩
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_top : (π.biUnion fun _ => ⊤) = π := by
ext
simp
@[congr]
theorem biUnion_congr (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ∈ π₁, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ := by
subst π₂
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion]
constructor <;> exact fun ⟨J', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨J', h₁, hi J' h₁ ▸ h₂⟩
theorem biUnion_congr_of_le (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ≤ I, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ :=
biUnion_congr h fun J hJ => hi J (π₁.le_of_mem hJ)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).iUnion := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_biUnion_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, f J' := by
refine Finset.sum_biUnion fun J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J' h₁' h₂' => ?_
exact hne (π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem h₁') ((πi J₂).le_of_mem h₂'))
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `J ∈ π.biUnion πi`, returns the box `J' ∈ π` such that `J ∈ πi J'`.
For `J ∉ π.biUnion πi`, returns `I`. -/
def biUnionIndex (πi : ∀ (J : Box ι), Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : Box ι :=
if hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi then (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose else I
theorem biUnionIndex_mem (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ∈ π := by
rw [biUnionIndex, dif_pos hJ]
exact (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.1
theorem biUnionIndex_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ≤ I := by
by_cases hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi
· exact π.le_of_mem (π.biUnionIndex_mem hJ)
· rw [biUnionIndex, dif_neg hJ]
theorem mem_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ∈ πi (π.biUnionIndex πi J) := by
convert (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.2 <;> exact dif_pos hJ
theorem le_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ≤ π.biUnionIndex πi J :=
le_of_mem _ (π.mem_biUnionIndex hJ)
/-- Uniqueness property of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnionIndex`. -/
theorem biUnionIndex_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : π.biUnionIndex πi J' = J :=
have : J' ∈ π.biUnion πi := π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩
π.eq_of_le_of_le (π.biUnionIndex_mem this) hJ (π.le_biUnionIndex this) (le_of_mem _ hJ')
theorem biUnion_assoc (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (πi' : Box ι → ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion fun J => (πi J).biUnion (πi' J)) =
(π.biUnion πi).biUnion fun J => πi' (π.biUnionIndex πi J) J := by
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro ⟨J₁, hJ₁, J₂, hJ₂, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₂⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂]
· rintro ⟨J₁, ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₁⟩, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, hJ₂, J₁, hJ₁, ?_⟩
rwa [π.biUnionIndex_of_mem hJ₂ hJ₁] at hJ
/-- Create a `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` from a collection of possibly empty boxes by filtering out
the empty one if it exists. -/
def ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
Prepartition I where
boxes := Finset.eraseNone boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
rw [mem_eraseNone] at hJ
simpa only [WithBot.some_eq_coe, WithBot.coe_le_coe] using le_of_mem _ hJ
pairwiseDisjoint J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne := by
simp only [mem_coe, mem_eraseNone] at h₁ h₂
exact Box.disjoint_coe.1 (pairwise_disjoint h₁ h₂ (mt Option.some_inj.1 hne))
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofWithBot {boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι))} {h₁ h₂} :
J ∈ (ofWithBot boxes h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ∈ boxes :=
mem_eraseNone
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ofWithBot (boxes : Finset (WithBot (Box ι)))
(le_of_mem : ∀ J ∈ boxes, (J : WithBot (Box ι)) ≤ I)
(pairwise_disjoint : Set.Pairwise (boxes : Set (WithBot (Box ι))) Disjoint) :
| (ofWithBot boxes le_of_mem pairwise_disjoint).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, ↑J := by
suffices ⋃ (J : Box ι) (_ : ↑J ∈ boxes), ↑J = ⋃ J ∈ boxes, (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) by
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 376 | 377 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by
simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_natCast' (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (n : PartENat) = n := by
rw [toWithTop_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] {_ : Decidable (OfNat.ofNat n : PartENat).Dom} :
toWithTop (ofNat(n) : PartENat) = OfNat.ofNat n := toWithTop_natCast' n
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_le {x y : PartENat} [hx : Decidable x.Dom] [hy : Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x ≤ toWithTop y ↔ x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hy
· simp
induction x using PartENat.casesOn generalizing hx
· simp
· simp
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_lt {x y : PartENat} [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] :
toWithTop x < toWithTop y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le toWithTop_le
end WithTop
/-- Coercion from `ℕ∞` to `PartENat`. -/
@[coe]
def ofENat : ℕ∞ → PartENat :=
fun x => match x with
| Option.none => none
| Option.some n => some n
instance : Coe ℕ∞ PartENat := ⟨ofENat⟩
example (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℕ∞) : PartENat) = ↑n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_coe (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ofENat ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toWithTop_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop (↑n) = n := by
cases n with
| top => simp
| coe n => simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_toWithTop (x : PartENat) {_ : Decidable (x : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop x = x := by
induction x using PartENat.casesOn <;> simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_le {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x ≤ ofENat y ↔ x ≤ y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_le, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofENat_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : ofENat x < ofENat y ↔ x < y := by
classical
rw [← toWithTop_lt, toWithTop_ofENat, toWithTop_ofENat]
section WithTopEquiv
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_add {x y : PartENat} : toWithTop (x + y) = toWithTop x + toWithTop y := by
refine PartENat.casesOn y ?_ ?_ <;> refine PartENat.casesOn x ?_ ?_ <;>
simp [add_top, top_add, ← Nat.cast_add, ← ENat.coe_add]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `Equiv` between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞` (for the order isomorphism see
`withTopOrderIso`). -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def withTopEquiv : PartENat ≃ ℕ∞ where
toFun x := toWithTop x
invFun x := ↑x
left_inv x := by simp
right_inv x := by simp
theorem withTopEquiv_top : withTopEquiv ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_natCast (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv n = n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_zero : withTopEquiv 0 = 0 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_one : withTopEquiv 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_le {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x ≤ withTopEquiv y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_lt {x y : PartENat} : withTopEquiv x < withTopEquiv y ↔ x < y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_top : withTopEquiv.symm ⊤ = ⊤ := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_coe (n : Nat) : withTopEquiv.symm n = n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_zero : withTopEquiv.symm 0 = 0 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_one : withTopEquiv.symm 1 = 1 := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_ofNat (n : Nat) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
withTopEquiv.symm ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_le {x y : ℕ∞} : withTopEquiv.symm x ≤ withTopEquiv.symm y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem withTopEquiv_symm_lt {x y : ℕ∞} : withTopEquiv.symm x < withTopEquiv.symm y ↔ x < y := by
simp
/-- `toWithTop` induces an order isomorphism between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞ :=
{ withTopEquiv with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => withTopEquiv_le }
/-- `toWithTop` induces an additive monoid isomorphism between `PartENat` and `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞ :=
{ withTopEquiv with
map_add' := fun x y => by
simp only [withTopEquiv]
exact toWithTop_add }
end WithTopEquiv
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded PartENat (· < ·) := by
classical
change WellFounded fun a b : PartENat => a < b
simp_rw [← withTopEquiv_lt]
exact InvImage.wf _ wellFounded_lt
instance : WellFoundedLT PartENat :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation PartENat :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
section Find
variable (P : ℕ → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
/-- The smallest `PartENat` satisfying a (decidable) predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` -/
def find : PartENat :=
⟨∃ n, P n, Nat.find⟩
@[simp]
theorem find_get (h : (find P).Dom) : (find P).get h = Nat.find h :=
rfl
theorem find_dom (h : ∃ n, P n) : (find P).Dom :=
h
theorem lt_find (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m) : (n : PartENat) < find P := by
rw [coe_lt_iff]
intro h₁
rw [find_get]
have h₂ := @Nat.find_spec P _ h₁
revert h₂
contrapose!
exact h _
theorem lt_find_iff (n : ℕ) : (n : PartENat) < find P ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, ¬P m := by
refine ⟨?_, lt_find P n⟩
intro h m hm
by_cases H : (find P).Dom
· apply Nat.find_min H
rw [coe_lt_iff] at h
specialize h H
exact lt_of_le_of_lt hm h
· exact not_exists.mp H m
theorem find_le (n : ℕ) (h : P n) : find P ≤ n := by
rw [le_coe_iff]
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, @Nat.find_min' P _ _ _ h⟩
theorem find_eq_top_iff : find P = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ¬P n :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt _).trans
⟨fun h n => (lt_find_iff P n).mp (h n) _ le_rfl, fun h n => lt_find P n fun _ _ => h _⟩
end Find
noncomputable instance : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop PartENat :=
{ PartENat.linearOrder, PartENat.isOrderedAddMonoid, PartENat.orderTop with
top_add' := top_add }
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder PartENat :=
{ lattice, withTopOrderIso.symm.toGaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice,
linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
end PartENat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 861 | 869 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Semisimple.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Orthogonal
/-!
# Lie algebras with non-degenerate invariant bilinear forms are semisimple
In this file we prove that a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field is semisimple
if it does not have non-trivial abelian ideals and it admits a
non-degenerate reflexive invariant bilinear form.
Here a form is *invariant* if it invariant under the Lie bracket
in the sense that `⁅x, Φ⁆ = 0` for all `x` or equivalently, `Φ ⁅x, y⁆ z = Φ x ⁅y, z⁆`.
## Main results
* `LieAlgebra.InvariantForm.orthogonal`: given a Lie submodule `N` of a Lie module `M`,
we define its orthogonal complement with respect to a non-degenerate invariant bilinear form `Φ`
as the Lie ideal of elements `x` such that `Φ n x = 0` for all `n ∈ N`.
* `LieAlgebra.InvariantForm.isSemisimple_of_nondegenerate`: the main result of this file;
a finite-dimensional Lie algebra over a field is semisimple
if it does not have non-trivial abelian ideals and admits
a non-degenerate invariant reflexive bilinear form.
## References
We follow the short and excellent paper [dieudonne1953].
-/
namespace LieAlgebra
namespace InvariantForm
section ring
variable {R L M : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable (Φ : LinearMap.BilinForm R M) (hΦ_nondeg : Φ.Nondegenerate)
variable (L) in
/--
A bilinear form on a Lie module `M` of a Lie algebra `L` is *invariant* if
for all `x : L` and `y z : M` the condition `Φ ⁅x, y⁆ z = -Φ y ⁅x, z⁆` holds.
-/
def _root_.LinearMap.BilinForm.lieInvariant : Prop :=
∀ (x : L) (y z : M), Φ ⁅x, y⁆ z = -Φ y ⁅x, z⁆
lemma _root_.LinearMap.BilinForm.lieInvariant_iff [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M] :
Φ.lieInvariant L ↔ Φ ∈ LieModule.maxTrivSubmodule R L (LinearMap.BilinForm R M) := by
refine ⟨fun h x ↦ ?_, fun h x y z ↦ ?_⟩
· ext y z
rw [LieHom.lie_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, Module.Dual.lie_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply,
LinearMap.zero_apply, h, sub_self]
· replace h := LinearMap.congr_fun₂ (h x) y z
simp only [LieHom.lie_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, Module.Dual.lie_apply,
LinearMap.zero_apply, sub_eq_zero] at h
simp [← h]
/--
The orthogonal complement of a Lie submodule `N` with respect to an invariant bilinear form `Φ` is
the Lie submodule of elements `y` such that `Φ x y = 0` for all `x ∈ N`.
-/
@[simps!]
def orthogonal (hΦ_inv : Φ.lieInvariant L) (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : LieSubmodule R L M where
__ := Φ.orthogonal N
lie_mem {x y} := by
suffices (∀ n ∈ N, Φ n y = 0) → ∀ n ∈ N, Φ n ⁅x, y⁆ = 0 by
simpa only [LinearMap.BilinForm.isOrtho_def, -- and some default simp lemmas
AddSubsemigroup.mem_carrier, AddSubmonoid.mem_toSubsemigroup, Submodule.mem_toAddSubmonoid,
LinearMap.BilinForm.mem_orthogonal_iff, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule]
intro H a ha
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← hΦ_inv]
exact H _ <| N.lie_mem ha
variable (hΦ_inv : Φ.lieInvariant L)
@[simp]
lemma orthogonal_toSubmodule (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
(orthogonal Φ hΦ_inv N).toSubmodule = Φ.orthogonal N.toSubmodule := rfl
lemma mem_orthogonal (N : LieSubmodule R L M) (y : M) :
y ∈ orthogonal Φ hΦ_inv N ↔ ∀ x ∈ N, Φ x y = 0 := by
simp [orthogonal, LinearMap.BilinForm.isOrtho_def, LinearMap.BilinForm.mem_orthogonal_iff]
variable [LieAlgebra R L]
lemma orthogonal_disjoint
(Φ : LinearMap.BilinForm R L) (hΦ_nondeg : Φ.Nondegenerate) (hΦ_inv : Φ.lieInvariant L)
-- TODO: replace the following assumption by a typeclass assumption `[HasNonAbelianAtoms]`
(hL : ∀ I : LieIdeal R L, IsAtom I → ¬IsLieAbelian I)
(I : LieIdeal R L) (hI : IsAtom I) :
Disjoint I (orthogonal Φ hΦ_inv I) := by
rw [disjoint_iff, ← hI.lt_iff, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
suffices ¬I ≤ orthogonal Φ hΦ_inv I by simpa
intro contra
apply hI.1
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← lie_eq_self_of_isAtom_of_nonabelian I hI (hL I hI),
LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
simp only [LieSubmodule.bot_coe, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
apply hΦ_nondeg
intro z
rw [hΦ_inv, neg_eq_zero]
have hyz : ⁅(x : L), z⁆ ∈ I := lie_mem_left _ _ _ _ _ x.2
exact contra hyz y y.2
end ring
section field
variable {K L M : Type*}
variable [Field K] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra K L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module K M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [Module.Finite K L]
variable (Φ : LinearMap.BilinForm K L) (hΦ_nondeg : Φ.Nondegenerate)
variable (hΦ_inv : Φ.lieInvariant L) (hΦ_refl : Φ.IsRefl)
-- TODO: replace the following assumption by a typeclass assumption `[HasNonAbelianAtoms]`
variable (hL : ∀ I : LieIdeal K L, IsAtom I → ¬IsLieAbelian I)
include hΦ_nondeg hΦ_refl hL
open Module Submodule in
lemma orthogonal_isCompl_toSubmodule (I : LieIdeal K L) (hI : IsAtom I) :
IsCompl I.toSubmodule (orthogonal Φ hΦ_inv I).toSubmodule := by
rw [orthogonal_toSubmodule, LinearMap.BilinForm.isCompl_orthogonal_iff_disjoint hΦ_refl,
← orthogonal_toSubmodule _ hΦ_inv, LieSubmodule.disjoint_toSubmodule]
| exact orthogonal_disjoint Φ hΦ_nondeg hΦ_inv hL I hI
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias orthogonal_isCompl_coe_submodule := orthogonal_isCompl_toSubmodule
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/InvariantForm.lean | 132 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Justus Springer
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.OpenNhds
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.UniqueGluing
/-!
# Stalks
For a presheaf `F` on a topological space `X`, valued in some category `C`, the *stalk* of `F`
at the point `x : X` is defined as the colimit of the composition of the inclusion of categories
`(OpenNhds x)ᵒᵖ ⥤ (Opens X)ᵒᵖ` and the functor `F : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C`.
For an open neighborhood `U` of `x`, we define the map `F.germ x : F.obj (op U) ⟶ F.stalk x` as the
canonical morphism into this colimit.
Taking stalks is functorial: For every point `x : X` we define a functor `stalkFunctor C x`,
sending presheaves on `X` to objects of `C`. Furthermore, for a map `f : X ⟶ Y` between
topological spaces, we define `stalkPushforward` as the induced map on the stalks
`(f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x`.
Some lemmas about stalks and germs only hold for certain classes of concrete categories. A basic
property of forgetful functors of categories of algebraic structures (like `MonCat`,
`CommRingCat`,...) is that they preserve filtered colimits. Since stalks are filtered colimits,
this ensures that the stalks of presheaves valued in these categories behave exactly as for
`Type`-valued presheaves. For example, in `germ_exist` we prove that in such a category, every
element of the stalk is the germ of a section.
Furthermore, if we require the forgetful functor to reflect isomorphisms and preserve limits (as
is the case for most algebraic structures), we have access to the unique gluing API and can prove
further properties. Most notably, in `is_iso_iff_stalk_functor_map_iso`, we prove that in such
a category, a morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism if and only if all of its stalk maps are
isomorphisms.
See also the definition of "algebraic structures" in the stacks project:
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/007L
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
noncomputable section
universe v u v' u'
open CategoryTheory
open TopCat
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open TopologicalSpace Topology
open Opposite
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [HasColimits.{v} C]
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{v}}
namespace TopCat.Presheaf
variable (C) in
/-- Stalks are functorial with respect to morphisms of presheaves over a fixed `X`. -/
def stalkFunctor (x : X) : X.Presheaf C ⥤ C :=
(whiskeringLeft _ _ C).obj (OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ colim
/-- The stalk of a presheaf `F` at a point `x` is calculated as the colimit of the functor
nbhds x ⥤ opens F.X ⥤ C
-/
def stalk (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : C :=
(stalkFunctor C x).obj ℱ
-- -- colimit ((open_nhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ)
@[simp]
theorem stalkFunctor_obj (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : (stalkFunctor C x).obj ℱ = ℱ.stalk x :=
rfl
/-- The germ of a section of a presheaf over an open at a point of that open.
-/
def germ (F : X.Presheaf C) (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) : F.obj (op U) ⟶ stalk F x :=
colimit.ι ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) (op ⟨U, hx⟩)
/-- The germ of a global section of a presheaf at a point. -/
def Γgerm (F : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : F.obj (op ⊤) ⟶ stalk F x :=
F.germ ⊤ x True.intro
@[reassoc]
theorem germ_res (F : X.Presheaf C) {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
F.map i.op ≫ F.germ U x hx = F.germ V x (i.le hx) :=
let i' : (⟨U, hx⟩ : OpenNhds x) ⟶ ⟨V, i.le hx⟩ := i
colimit.w ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) i'.op
/-- A variant of `germ_res` with `op V ⟶ op U`
so that the LHS is more general and simp fires more easier. -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem germ_res' (F : X.Presheaf C) {U V : Opens X} (i : op V ⟶ op U) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
F.map i ≫ F.germ U x hx = F.germ V x (i.unop.le hx) :=
let i' : (⟨U, hx⟩ : OpenNhds x) ⟶ ⟨V, i.unop.le hx⟩ := i.unop
colimit.w ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ F) i'.op
@[reassoc]
lemma map_germ_eq_Γgerm (F : X.Presheaf C) {U : Opens X} {i : U ⟶ ⊤} (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) :
F.map i.op ≫ F.germ U x hx = F.Γgerm x :=
germ_res F i x hx
variable {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type*} [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)]
theorem germ_res_apply (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) [ConcreteCategory C FC] (s) :
F.germ U x hx (F.map i.op s) = F.germ V x (i.le hx) s := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, germ_res]
theorem germ_res_apply' (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U V : Opens X} (i : op V ⟶ op U) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) [ConcreteCategory C FC] (s) :
F.germ U x hx (F.map i s) = F.germ V x (i.unop.le hx) s := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, germ_res']
lemma Γgerm_res_apply (F : X.Presheaf C)
{U : Opens X} {i : U ⟶ ⊤} (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) [ConcreteCategory C FC] (s) :
F.germ U x hx (F.map i.op s) = F.Γgerm x s := F.germ_res_apply i x hx s
/-- A morphism from the stalk of `F` at `x` to some object `Y` is completely determined by its
composition with the `germ` morphisms.
-/
@[ext]
theorem stalk_hom_ext (F : X.Presheaf C) {x} {Y : C} {f₁ f₂ : F.stalk x ⟶ Y}
(ih : ∀ (U : Opens X) (hxU : x ∈ U), F.germ U x hxU ≫ f₁ = F.germ U x hxU ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ :=
colimit.hom_ext fun U => by
induction U with | op U => obtain ⟨U, hxU⟩ := U; exact ih U hxU
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem stalkFunctor_map_germ {F G : X.Presheaf C} (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : F ⟶ G) :
F.germ U x hx ≫ (stalkFunctor C x).map f = f.app (op U) ≫ G.germ U x hx :=
colimit.ι_map (whiskerLeft (OpenNhds.inclusion x).op f) (op ⟨U, hx⟩)
theorem stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply [ConcreteCategory C FC]
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : F ⟶ G) (s) :
(stalkFunctor C x).map f (F.germ U x hx s) = G.germ U x hx (f.app (op U) s) := by
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← stalkFunctor_map_germ, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
rfl
-- a variant of `stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply` that makes simpNF happy.
@[simp]
theorem stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply' [ConcreteCategory C FC]
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (U : Opens X) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ U) (f : F ⟶ G) (s) :
DFunLike.coe (F := ToHom (F.stalk x) (G.stalk x))
(ConcreteCategory.hom ((stalkFunctor C x).map f)) (F.germ U x hx s) =
G.germ U x hx (f.app (op U) s) :=
stalkFunctor_map_germ_apply U x hx f s
variable (C)
/-- For a presheaf `F` on a space `X`, a continuous map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a morphisms between the
stalk of `f _ * F` at `f x` and the stalk of `F` at `x`.
-/
def stalkPushforward (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) : (f _* F).stalk (f x) ⟶ F.stalk x := by
-- This is a hack; Lean doesn't like to elaborate the term written directly.
refine ?_ ≫ colimit.pre _ (OpenNhds.map f x).op
exact colim.map (whiskerRight (NatTrans.op (OpenNhds.inclusionMapIso f x).inv) F)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem stalkPushforward_germ (f : X ⟶ Y) (F : X.Presheaf C) (U : Opens Y)
(x : X) (hx : f x ∈ U) :
(f _* F).germ U (f x) hx ≫ F.stalkPushforward C f x = F.germ ((Opens.map f).obj U) x hx := by
simp [germ, stalkPushforward]
-- Here are two other potential solutions, suggested by @fpvandoorn at
-- <https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/1018#discussion_r283978240>
-- However, I can't get the subsequent two proofs to work with either one.
-- def stalkPushforward'' (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
-- (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
-- colim.map ((Functor.associator _ _ _).inv ≫
-- whiskerRight (NatTrans.op (OpenNhds.inclusionMapIso f x).inv) ℱ) ≫
-- colimit.pre ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ) (OpenNhds.map f x).op
-- def stalkPushforward''' (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
-- (f _* ℱ).stalk (f x) ⟶ ℱ.stalk x :=
-- (colim.map (whiskerRight (NatTrans.op (OpenNhds.inclusionMapIso f x).inv) ℱ) :
-- colim.obj ((OpenNhds.inclusion (f x) ⋙ Opens.map f).op ⋙ ℱ) ⟶ _) ≫
-- colimit.pre ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ ℱ) (OpenNhds.map f x).op
|
namespace stalkPushforward
@[simp]
theorem id (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (x : X) :
ℱ.stalkPushforward C (𝟙 X) x = (stalkFunctor C x).map (Pushforward.id ℱ).hom := by
ext
simp only [stalkPushforward, germ, colim_map, ι_colimMap_assoc, whiskerRight_app]
erw [CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id]
simp [stalkFunctor]
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Stalks.lean | 184 | 194 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.JapaneseBracket
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegralEqImproper
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Integral
/-!
# Evaluation of specific improper integrals
This file contains some integrability results, and evaluations of integrals, over `ℝ` or over
half-infinite intervals in `ℝ`.
These lemmas are stated in terms of either `Iic` or `Ioi` (neglecting `Iio` and `Ici`) to match
mathlib's conventions for integrals over finite intervals (see `intervalIntegral`).
## See also
- `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals` -- integrals over finite intervals
- `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian` -- integral of `exp (-x ^ 2)`
- `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.JapaneseBracket`-- integrability of `(1+‖x‖)^(-r)`.
-/
open Real Set Filter MeasureTheory intervalIntegral
open scoped Topology
theorem integrableOn_exp_Iic (c : ℝ) : IntegrableOn exp (Iic c) := by
refine
integrableOn_Iic_of_intervalIntegral_norm_bounded (exp c) c
(fun y => intervalIntegrable_exp.1) tendsto_id
(eventually_of_mem (Iic_mem_atBot 0) fun y _ => ?_)
simp_rw [norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, integral_exp, sub_le_self_iff]
exact (exp_pos _).le
theorem integrableOn_exp_neg_Ioi (c : ℝ) : IntegrableOn (fun (x : ℝ) => exp (-x)) (Ioi c) :=
integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi.mp (integrableOn_exp_Iic (-c)).comp_neg_Ici
theorem integral_exp_Iic (c : ℝ) : ∫ x : ℝ in Iic c, exp x = exp c := by
refine
tendsto_nhds_unique
(intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Iic _ (integrableOn_exp_Iic _) tendsto_id) ?_
simp_rw [integral_exp, show 𝓝 (exp c) = 𝓝 (exp c - 0) by rw [sub_zero]]
exact tendsto_exp_atBot.const_sub _
theorem integral_exp_Iic_zero : ∫ x : ℝ in Iic 0, exp x = 1 :=
exp_zero ▸ integral_exp_Iic 0
theorem integral_exp_neg_Ioi (c : ℝ) : (∫ x : ℝ in Ioi c, exp (-x)) = exp (-c) := by
simpa only [integral_comp_neg_Ioi] using integral_exp_Iic (-c)
theorem integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero : (∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, exp (-x)) = 1 := by
simpa only [neg_zero, exp_zero] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi 0
theorem integrableOn_exp_mul_complex_Ioi {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < 0) (c : ℝ) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => Complex.exp (a * x)) (Ioi c) := by
refine (integrable_norm_iff ?_).mp ?_
· apply Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable
fun_prop
· simpa [Complex.norm_exp] using
(integrableOn_Ioi_comp_mul_left_iff (fun x => exp (-x)) c (a := -a.re) (by simpa)).mpr <|
integrableOn_exp_neg_Ioi _
theorem integrableOn_exp_mul_complex_Iic {a : ℂ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (c : ℝ) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => Complex.exp (a * x)) (Iic c) := by
simpa using integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableOn_Iio.mpr
(integrableOn_exp_mul_complex_Ioi (a := -a) (by simpa) (-c)).comp_neg_Iio
theorem integrableOn_exp_mul_Ioi {a : ℝ} (ha : a < 0) (c : ℝ) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => Real.exp (a * x)) (Ioi c) := by
have := Integrable.norm <| integrableOn_exp_mul_complex_Ioi (a := a) (by simpa using ha) c
simpa [Complex.norm_exp] using this
theorem integrableOn_exp_mul_Iic {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (c : ℝ) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => Real.exp (a * x)) (Iic c) := by
have := Integrable.norm <| integrableOn_exp_mul_complex_Iic (a := a) (by simpa using ha) c
simpa [Complex.norm_exp] using this
theorem integral_exp_mul_complex_Ioi {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < 0) (c : ℝ) :
∫ x : ℝ in Set.Ioi c, Complex.exp (a * x) = - Complex.exp (a * c) / a := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi c
(integrableOn_exp_mul_complex_Ioi ha c) tendsto_id) ?_
simp_rw [integral_exp_mul_complex (c := a) (by aesop), id_eq]
suffices Tendsto (fun x : ℝ ↦ Complex.exp (a * x)) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using this.sub_const _ |>.div_const _
simpa [Complex.tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_iff] using tendsto_const_nhds.neg_mul_atTop ha tendsto_id
| theorem integral_exp_mul_complex_Iic {a : ℂ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (c : ℝ) :
∫ x : ℝ in Set.Iic c, Complex.exp (a * x) = Complex.exp (a * c) / a := by
simpa [neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← Complex.ofReal_neg,
integral_comp_neg_Ioi (f := fun x : ℝ ↦ Complex.exp (a * x))]
using integral_exp_mul_complex_Ioi (a := -a) (by simpa) (-c)
theorem integral_exp_mul_Ioi {a : ℝ} (ha : a < 0) (c : ℝ) :
∫ x : ℝ in Set.Ioi c, Real.exp (a * x) = - Real.exp (a * c) / a := by
simp_rw [Real.exp, ← RCLike.re_to_complex, Complex.ofReal_mul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/ImproperIntegrals.lean | 93 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
section NthRoots
/-- `nthRoots n a` noncomputably returns the solutions to `x ^ n = a`. -/
def nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset R :=
roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRoots {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a x : R} : x ∈ nthRoots n a ↔ x ^ n = a := by
rw [nthRoots, mem_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a), IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_pow,
eval_X, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero (r : R) : nthRoots 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [empty_eq_zero, pow_zero, nthRoots, ← C_1, ← C_sub, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero_right {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (n : ℕ) :
nthRoots n (0 : R) = Multiset.replicate n 0 := by
rw [nthRoots, C.map_zero, sub_zero, roots_pow, roots_X, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
theorem card_nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset.card (nthRoots n a) ≤ n := by
classical exact
(if hn : n = 0 then
if h : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a = 0 then by
simp [Nat.zero_le, nthRoots, roots, h, dif_pos rfl, empty_eq_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots h)
(by
rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_sub]
exact degree_C_le))
else by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)]
rw [← degree_X_pow_sub_C (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a]
exact card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a))
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_two_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : nthRoots 2 r = 0 ↔ ¬IsSquare r := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_nthRoots (by norm_num : 0 < 2),
← not_exists, eq_comm]
/-- The multiset `nthRoots ↑n a` as a Finset. Previously `nthRootsFinset n` was defined to be
`nthRoots n (1 : R)` as a Finset. That situation can be recovered by setting `a` to be `(1 : R)` -/
def nthRootsFinset (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : Finset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a)
lemma nthRootsFinset_def (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] :
nthRootsFinset n a = Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a) := by
unfold nthRootsFinset
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRootsFinset {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (a : R) {x : R} :
x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a ↔ x ^ (n : ℕ) = a := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset_def, mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots h]
@[simp]
theorem nthRootsFinset_zero (a : R) : nthRootsFinset 0 a = ∅ := by
classical simp [nthRootsFinset_def]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[MonoidHomClass F R S] {a : R} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n (f a) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn] at hx
· rw [mem_nthRootsFinset <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn, ← map_pow, (mem_nthRootsFinset
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a).1 hx]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset_one {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[RingHomClass F R S] {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1 := by
rw [← (map_one f)]
exact map_mem_nthRootsFinset hx _
theorem mul_mem_nthRootsFinset
{η₁ η₂ : R} {a₁ a₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₁) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₂) :
η₁ * η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (a₁ * a₂) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη₁
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos] at hη₁ hη₂ ⊢
rw [mul_pow, hη₁, hη₂]
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_nthRootsFinset {η : R} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hη : η ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) :
η ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
rintro rfl
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos, zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at hη
exact ha hη.symm
theorem one_mem_nthRootsFinset (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R) := by
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset hn, one_pow]
end NthRoots
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
variable [CommRing T]
/-- Given a polynomial `p` with coefficients in a ring `T` and a `T`-algebra `S`, `aroots p S` is
the multiset of roots of `p` regarded as a polynomial over `S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, roots_C_mul]
rwa [map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
@[simp]
theorem aroots_smul_nonzero [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, aroots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).aroots S = n • p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_pow, roots_pow]
theorem aroots_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_pow, aroots_X]
theorem aroots_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(C a * X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_C_mul _ ha, aroots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n a).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, aroots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
variable (R S) in
@[simp]
theorem aroots_map (p : T[X]) [CommRing S] [Algebra T S] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
[IsScalarTower T S R] :
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).aroots R = p.aroots R := by
rw [aroots_def, aroots_def, map_map, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq T S R]
/-- The set of distinct roots of `p` in `S`.
If you have a non-separable polynomial, use `Polynomial.aroots` for the multiset
where multiple roots have the appropriate multiplicity. -/
def rootSet (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Set S :=
haveI := Classical.decEq S
(p.aroots S).toFinset
theorem rootSet_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [DecidableEq S] :
p.rootSet S = (p.aroots S).toFinset := by
rw [rootSet]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).rootSet S = ∅ := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, aroots_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.coe_empty]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_0, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_one (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (1 : T[X]).rootSet S = ∅ := by
rw [← C_1, rootSet_C]
@[simp]
theorem rootSet_neg (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(-p).rootSet S = p.rootSet S := by
rw [rootSet, aroots_neg, rootSet]
instance rootSetFintype (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
Fintype (p.rootSet S) :=
FinsetCoe.fintype _
theorem rootSet_finite (p : T[X]) (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(p.rootSet S).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
/-- The set of roots of all polynomials of bounded degree and having coefficients in a finite set
is finite. -/
theorem bUnion_roots_finite {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [DecidableEq S]
(m : R →+* S) (d : ℕ) {U : Set R} (h : U.Finite) :
(⋃ (f : R[X]) (_ : f.natDegree ≤ d ∧ ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ U),
((f.map m).roots.toFinset.toSet : Set S)).Finite :=
Set.Finite.biUnion
(by
-- We prove that the set of polynomials under consideration is finite because its
-- image by the injective map `π` is finite
let π : R[X] → Fin (d + 1) → R := fun f i => f.coeff i
refine ((Set.Finite.pi fun _ => h).subset <| ?_).of_finite_image (?_ : Set.InjOn π _)
· exact Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun f hf i _ => hf.2 i
· refine fun x hx y hy hxy => (ext_iff_natDegree_le hx.1 hy.1).2 fun i hi => ?_
exact id congr_fun hxy ⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi⟩)
fun _ _ => Finset.finite_toSet _
theorem mem_rootSet' {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S} :
a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
classical
rw [rootSet_def, Finset.mem_coe, mem_toFinset, mem_aroots']
theorem mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : S} : a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_rootSet', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
theorem mem_rootSet_of_ne {p : T[X]} {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] (hp : p ≠ 0) {a : S} : a ∈ p.rootSet S ↔ aeval a p = 0 :=
mem_rootSet.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem rootSet_maps_to' {p : T[X]} {S S'} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [CommRing S']
[IsDomain S'] [Algebra T S'] (hp : p.map (algebraMap T S') = 0 → p.map (algebraMap T S) = 0)
(f : S →ₐ[T] S') : (p.rootSet S).MapsTo f (p.rootSet S') := fun x hx => by
rw [mem_rootSet'] at hx ⊢
rw [aeval_algHom, AlgHom.comp_apply, hx.2, _root_.map_zero]
exact ⟨mt hp hx.1, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S}
(h : a ∈ p.rootSet S) : p ≠ 0 := fun hf => by rwa [hf, rootSet_zero] at h
theorem aeval_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSet {p : T[X]} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {a : S}
(hx : a ∈ p.rootSet S) : aeval a p = 0 :=
(mem_rootSet'.1 hx).2
theorem rootSet_mapsTo {p : T[X]} {S S'} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] [CommRing S']
[IsDomain S'] [Algebra T S'] [NoZeroSMulDivisors T S'] (f : S →ₐ[T] S') :
(p.rootSet S).MapsTo f (p.rootSet S') := by
refine rootSet_maps_to' (fun h₀ => ?_) f
obtain rfl : p = 0 :=
map_injective _ (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S') (by rwa [Polynomial.map_zero])
exact Polynomial.map_zero _
theorem mem_rootSet_of_injective [CommRing S] {p : S[X]} [Algebra S R]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap S R)) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
x ∈ p.rootSet R ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
classical
exact Multiset.mem_toFinset.trans (mem_roots_map_of_injective h hp)
end Roots
lemma eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
(p : R[X]) {ι} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(heval : ∀ i, p.eval (f i) = 0) (hcard : natDegree p < Fintype.card ι) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine lt_irrefl #p.roots.toFinset ?_
calc
#p.roots.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card p.roots := Multiset.toFinset_card_le _
_ ≤ natDegree p := Polynomial.card_roots' p
_ < Fintype.card ι := hcard
_ = Fintype.card (Set.range f) := (Set.card_range_of_injective hf).symm
_ = #(Finset.univ.image f) := by rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Set.toFinset_range]
_ ≤ #p.roots.toFinset := Finset.card_mono ?_
intro _
simp only [Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots', ne_eq,
IsRoot.def, forall_exists_index, hp, not_false_eq_true]
rintro x rfl
exact heval _
lemma eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero' {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
(p : R[X]) (s : Finset R) (heval : ∀ i ∈ s, p.eval i = 0) (hcard : natDegree p < #s) :
p = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero p Subtype.val_injective
(fun i : s ↦ heval i i.prop) (hcard.trans_eq (Fintype.card_coe s).symm)
open Cardinal in
lemma eq_zero_of_forall_eval_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card
(f : R[X]) (hf : ∀ r, f.eval r = 0) (hfR : f.natDegree < #R) : f = 0 := by
obtain hR|hR := finite_or_infinite R
· have := Fintype.ofFinite R
apply eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card_of_eval_eq_zero f Function.injective_id hf
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_lt] using hfR
· exact zero_of_eval_zero _ hf
open Cardinal in
lemma exists_eval_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card (f : R[X]) (hf : f ≠ 0) (hfR : f.natDegree < #R) :
∃ r, f.eval r ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hf
exact eq_zero_of_forall_eval_zero_of_natDegree_lt_card f hf hfR
section
omit [IsDomain R]
theorem monic_multisetProd_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : Monic (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod :=
monic_multiset_prod_of_monic _ _ fun a _ => monic_X_sub_C a
theorem monic_prod_X_sub_C {α : Type*} (b : α → R) (s : Finset α) :
Monic (∏ a ∈ s, (X - C (b a))) :=
monic_prod_of_monic _ _ fun a _ => monic_X_sub_C (b a)
| theorem monic_finprod_X_sub_C {α : Type*} (b : α → R) : Monic (∏ᶠ k, (X - C (b k))) :=
monic_finprod_of_monic _ _ fun a _ => monic_X_sub_C (b a)
end
theorem prod_multiset_root_eq_finset_root [DecidableEq R] :
(p.roots.map fun a => X - C a).prod =
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 632 | 638 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.RegularMono
/-!
# Kernel pairs
This file defines what it means for a parallel pair of morphisms `a b : R ⟶ X` to be the kernel pair
for a morphism `f`.
Some properties of kernel pairs are given, namely allowing one to transfer between
the kernel pair of `f₁ ≫ f₂` to the kernel pair of `f₁`.
It is also proved that if `f` is a coequalizer of some pair, and `a`,`b` is a kernel pair for `f`
then it is a coequalizer of `a`,`b`.
## Implementation
The definition is essentially just a wrapper for `IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk _ _ _)`, but the
constructions given here are useful, yet awkward to present in that language, so a basic API
is developed here.
## TODO
- Internal equivalence relations (or congruences) and the fact that every kernel pair induces one,
and the converse in an effective regular category (WIP by b-mehta).
-/
universe v u u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {R X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (a b : R ⟶ X)
/-- `IsKernelPair f a b` expresses that `(a, b)` is a kernel pair for `f`, i.e. `a ≫ f = b ≫ f`
and the square
R → X
↓ ↓
X → Y
is a pullback square.
This is just an abbreviation for `IsPullback a b f f`.
-/
abbrev IsKernelPair :=
IsPullback a b f f
namespace IsKernelPair
/-- The data expressing that `(a, b)` is a kernel pair is subsingleton. -/
instance : Subsingleton (IsKernelPair f a b) :=
⟨fun P Q => by
cases P
cases Q
congr ⟩
/-- If `f` is a monomorphism, then `(𝟙 _, 𝟙 _)` is a kernel pair for `f`. -/
theorem id_of_mono [Mono f] : IsKernelPair f (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) :=
⟨⟨rfl⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId _⟩⟩
instance [Mono f] : Inhabited (IsKernelPair f (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)) :=
⟨id_of_mono f⟩
variable {f a b}
-- Porting note: `lift` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/--
Given a pair of morphisms `p`, `q` to `X` which factor through `f`, they factor through any kernel
pair of `f`.
-/
noncomputable def lift {S : C} (k : IsKernelPair f a b) (p q : S ⟶ X) (w : p ≫ f = q ≫ f) :
S ⟶ R :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift k.isLimit _ _ w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_fst {S : C} (k : IsKernelPair f a b) (p q : S ⟶ X) (w : p ≫ f = q ≫ f) :
k.lift p q w ≫ a = p :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift_fst _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma lift_snd {S : C} (k : IsKernelPair f a b) (p q : S ⟶ X) (w : p ≫ f = q ≫ f) :
k.lift p q w ≫ b = q :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift_snd _ _ _ _
/--
Given a pair of morphisms `p`, `q` to `X` which factor through `f`, they factor through any kernel
pair of `f`.
-/
noncomputable def lift' {S : C} (k : IsKernelPair f a b) (p q : S ⟶ X) (w : p ≫ f = q ≫ f) :
{ t : S ⟶ R // t ≫ a = p ∧ t ≫ b = q } :=
⟨k.lift p q w, by simp⟩
/--
If `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for `f₁ ≫ f₂` and `a ≫ f₁ = b ≫ f₁`, then `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for
just `f₁`.
That is, to show that `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for `f₁` it suffices to only show the square
commutes, rather than to additionally show it's a pullback.
-/
theorem cancel_right {f₁ : X ⟶ Y} {f₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (comm : a ≫ f₁ = b ≫ f₁)
(big_k : IsKernelPair (f₁ ≫ f₂) a b) : IsKernelPair f₁ a b :=
{ w := comm
isLimit' :=
⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun s => by
let s' : PullbackCone (f₁ ≫ f₂) (f₁ ≫ f₂) :=
PullbackCone.mk s.fst s.snd (s.condition_assoc _)
refine ⟨big_k.isLimit.lift s', big_k.isLimit.fac _ WalkingCospan.left,
big_k.isLimit.fac _ WalkingCospan.right, fun m₁ m₂ => ?_⟩
apply big_k.isLimit.hom_ext
refine (PullbackCone.mk a b ?_ : PullbackCone (f₁ ≫ f₂) _).equalizer_ext ?_ ?_
· apply reassoc_of% comm
· apply m₁.trans (big_k.isLimit.fac s' WalkingCospan.left).symm
· apply m₂.trans (big_k.isLimit.fac s' WalkingCospan.right).symm⟩ }
/-- If `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for `f₁ ≫ f₂` and `f₂` is mono, then `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for
just `f₁`.
The converse of `comp_of_mono`.
-/
theorem cancel_right_of_mono {f₁ : X ⟶ Y} {f₂ : Y ⟶ Z} [Mono f₂]
(big_k : IsKernelPair (f₁ ≫ f₂) a b) : IsKernelPair f₁ a b :=
cancel_right (by rw [← cancel_mono f₂, assoc, assoc, big_k.w]) big_k
/--
If `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for `f₁` and `f₂` is mono, then `(a,b)` is a kernel pair for `f₁ ≫ f₂`.
The converse of `cancel_right_of_mono`.
-/
theorem comp_of_mono {f₁ : X ⟶ Y} {f₂ : Y ⟶ Z} [Mono f₂] (small_k : IsKernelPair f₁ a b) :
IsKernelPair (f₁ ≫ f₂) a b :=
{ w := by rw [small_k.w_assoc]
isLimit' := ⟨by
refine PullbackCone.isLimitAux _
(fun s => small_k.lift s.fst s.snd (by rw [← cancel_mono f₂, assoc, s.condition, assoc]))
(by simp) (by simp) ?_
intro s m hm
apply small_k.isLimit.hom_ext
apply PullbackCone.equalizer_ext small_k.cone _ _
· exact (hm WalkingCospan.left).trans (by simp)
· exact (hm WalkingCospan.right).trans (by simp)⟩ }
/--
If `(a,b)` is the kernel pair of `f`, and `f` is a coequalizer morphism for some parallel pair, then
`f` is a coequalizer morphism of `a` and `b`.
-/
def toCoequalizer (k : IsKernelPair f a b) [r : RegularEpi f] : IsColimit (Cofork.ofπ f k.w) := by
let t := k.isLimit.lift (PullbackCone.mk _ _ r.w)
have ht : t ≫ a = r.left := k.isLimit.fac _ WalkingCospan.left
have kt : t ≫ b = r.right := k.isLimit.fac _ WalkingCospan.right
refine Cofork.IsColimit.mk _
(fun s => Cofork.IsColimit.desc r.isColimit s.π
(by rw [← ht, assoc, s.condition, reassoc_of% kt]))
(fun s => ?_) (fun s m w => ?_)
· apply Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc' r.isColimit
· apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext r.isColimit
exact w.trans (Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc' r.isColimit _ _).symm
/-- If `a₁ a₂ : A ⟶ Y` is a kernel pair for `g : Y ⟶ Z`, then `a₁ ×[Z] X` and `a₂ ×[Z] X`
(`A ×[Z] X ⟶ Y ×[Z] X`) is a kernel pair for `Y ×[Z] X ⟶ X`. -/
protected theorem pullback {X Y Z A : C} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {a₁ a₂ : A ⟶ Y} (h : IsKernelPair g a₁ a₂)
(f : X ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback f (a₁ ≫ g)] :
IsKernelPair (pullback.fst f g)
(pullback.map f _ f _ (𝟙 X) a₁ (𝟙 Z) (by simp) <| Category.comp_id _)
(pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 X) a₂ (𝟙 Z) (by simp) <| (Category.comp_id _).trans h.1.1) := by
refine ⟨⟨by rw [pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_fst]⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux _
(fun s => pullback.lift (s.fst ≫ pullback.fst _ _)
(h.lift (s.fst ≫ pullback.snd _ _) (s.snd ≫ pullback.snd _ _) ?_ ) ?_) (fun s => ?_)
(fun s => ?_) (fun s m hm => ?_)⟩⟩
· simp_rw [Category.assoc, ← pullback.condition, ← Category.assoc, s.condition]
· simp only [assoc, lift_fst_assoc, pullback.condition]
· ext <;> simp
· ext
· simp [s.condition]
· simp
· #adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
This `symm` (or the following ones that undo it) wasn't previously necessary. -/
symm
apply pullback.hom_ext
· symm
simpa using hm WalkingCospan.left =≫ pullback.fst f g
· symm
apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext h.isLimit
· simpa using hm WalkingCospan.left =≫ pullback.snd f g
· simpa using hm WalkingCospan.right =≫ pullback.snd f g
theorem mono_of_isIso_fst (h : IsKernelPair f a b) [IsIso a] : Mono f := by
obtain ⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩ := Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' h.isLimit (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h.w])
rw [IsPullback.cone_fst, ← IsIso.eq_comp_inv, Category.id_comp] at h₁
rw [h₁, IsIso.inv_comp_eq, Category.comp_id] at h₂
constructor
intro Z g₁ g₂ e
obtain ⟨l', rfl, rfl⟩ := Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' h.isLimit _ _ e
rw [IsPullback.cone_fst, h₂]
theorem isIso_of_mono (h : IsKernelPair f a b) [Mono f] : IsIso a := by
rw [←
show _ = a from
(Category.comp_id _).symm.trans
((IsKernelPair.id_of_mono f).isLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp h.isLimit
WalkingCospan.left)]
infer_instance
theorem of_isIso_of_mono [IsIso a] [Mono f] : IsKernelPair f a a := by
change IsPullback _ _ _ _
convert (IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨(rfl : a ≫ 𝟙 X = _ )⟩).paste_vert (IsKernelPair.id_of_mono f)
| all_goals { simp }
end IsKernelPair
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/KernelPair.lean | 209 | 215 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend,
PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target {x : M} :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
section IsManifold
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'}
open IsManifold
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I 1 M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source (I := I)] at h2x
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, differentiableWithinAtProp_self_source,
DifferentiableWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x) hx'
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx',
preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt]
rw [differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy,
continuousWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
/-- An alternative formulation of `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source)
(hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq hs hx]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hx hy
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. Version requiring differentiability
in the target instead of `range I`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source))
(extChartAt I x x') := by
refine (mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans ?_
rw [← extChartAt_source I] at hx
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
rw [and_congr_right_iff]
set e := extChartAt I x; set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
refine fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
rw [← e.image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' hx,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' hx, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' hy)
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') :=
(mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, DifferentiableOn, Set.forall_mem_image, ← forall_and, MDifferentiableOn]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx => mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image he he' hs (hs hx) (h2s hx)
/-- Differentiability on a set is equivalent to differentiability in the extended charts. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) :=
(mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hs h2s).trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦
(e.continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff hs h2s).1 h.continuousOn
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) :=
mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source' {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (extChartAt I' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) := by
rw [extChartAt_source] at hs h2s
exact mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h x hx).1, fun x y z hz => ?_⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hz
let w := (extChartAt I x).symm z
have : w ∈ s := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
specialize h w this
have w1 : w ∈ (chartAt H x).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
have w2 : f w ∈ (chartAt H' y).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
convert ((mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source w1 w2).mp h).2.mono _
· simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
· mfld_set_tac
· rintro ⟨hcont, hdiff⟩ x hx
refine differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_iff.mpr ?_
refine ⟨hcont x hx, ?_⟩
dsimp [DifferentiableWithinAtProp]
convert hdiff x (f x) (extChartAt I x x) (by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]) using 1
mfld_set_tac
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_target :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M', MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f)
(s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
simp only [mdifferentiableOn_iff, ModelWithCorners.source_eq, chartAt_self_eq,
PartialHomeomorph.refl_partialEquiv, PartialEquiv.refl_trans, extChartAt,
PartialHomeomorph.extend, Set.preimage_univ, Set.inter_univ, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
constructor
· refine fun h' y => ⟨?_, fun x _ => h' x y⟩
have h'' : ContinuousOn _ univ := (ModelWithCorners.continuous I').continuousOn
convert (h''.comp_inter (chartAt H' y).continuousOn_toFun).comp_inter h
simp
· exact fun h' x y => (h' y).2 x 0
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
simp [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff, continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart in the
target. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff_target :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ y : M',
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
rw [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff_target]
simp [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
end IsManifold
/-! ### Deducing differentiability from smoothness -/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
suffices h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) x by
rwa [mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'] at h
apply hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
exact extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (f x)
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff]
exact ⟨hf.1.mono inter_subset_left, (hf.2.differentiableWithinAt (mod_cast hn)).mono
(by mfld_set_tac)⟩
theorem ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt hf hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
(hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiable (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
fun x => (hf x).mdifferentiableAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn := ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiable := ContMDiff.mdifferentiable
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiable.continuous (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt
/-! ### Deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds -/
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hg : MDifferentiableAt I I'' g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x)
(hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x) (hg : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s)
(hg : MDifferentiableOn I I'' g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I I'' g) : MDifferentiable I (I'.prod I'') fun x => (f x, g x) := fun x =>
(hf x).prodMk (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk := MDifferentiable.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s) (hg : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk_space (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''} (hf : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g) : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') fun x => (f x, g x) :=
fun x => (hf x).prodMk_space (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiable.prodMk_space
theorem writtenInExtChartAt_comp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
{y | writtenInExtChartAt I I'' x (g ∘ f) y =
(writtenInExtChartAt I' I'' (f x) g ∘ writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f) y} ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x := by
apply
@Filter.mem_of_superset _ _ (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) _
(extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
(h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _)))
mfld_set_tac
variable {f' f₀' f₁' : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (f x)}
{g' : TangentSpace I' (f x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I'' (g (f x))}
/-- `UniqueMDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
protected nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' := by
-- Porting note: didn't need `convert` because of finding instances by unification
convert U.eq h.2 h₁.2
protected theorem UniqueMDiffOn.eq (U : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (hx : x ∈ s)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' :=
UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U _ hx) h h₁
/-!
### General lemmas on derivatives of functions between manifolds
We mimic the API for functions between vector spaces
-/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderivWithin_univ : mfderivWithin I I' f univ = mfderiv I I' f := by
ext x : 1
simp only [mfderivWithin, mfderiv, mfld_simps]
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt (h : ¬MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x = 0 := by simp only [mfderiv, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] : MDifferentiable I I' f := by
intro x
have : Subsingleton H := I.injective.subsingleton
have : DiscreteTopology M := discreteTopology H M
simp only [mdifferentiableAt_iff, continuous_of_discreteTopology.continuousAt, true_and]
exact (hasFDerivAt_of_subsingleton _ _).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin
(hf : (mfderivWithin I I' f s x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
contrapose hf
rw [mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt hf]
contrapose! hf
rcases ContinuousLinearMap.isInvertible_zero_iff.1 hf with ⟨hE, hF⟩
have : Subsingleton E := hE
exact mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton.mdifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_of_isInvertible_mfderiv
(hf : (mfderiv I I' f x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp only [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mfderivWithin_univ] at hf ⊢
exact mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin hf
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst,
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 (inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono hst) (Subset.refl _))⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt h.1, HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 inter_subset_right⟩
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f univ x f' ↔ HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivAt, continuousWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivAt_unique (h₀ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₀') (h₁ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₁') :
f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact (uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq,
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter', continuousWithinAt_inter' h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin h
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter,
continuousWithinAt_inter h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds h
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(ht : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∪ t) x f' := by
constructor
· exact ContinuousWithinAt.union hs.1 ht.1
· convert HasFDerivWithinAt.union hs.2 ht.2 using 1
simp only [union_inter_distrib_right, preimage_union]
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (ht : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f' :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht).1 (h.mono inter_subset_right)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x (mfderivWithin I I' f s x) := by
refine ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.2
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_exists_hasMFDerivWithinAt :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ ∃ f', HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨mfderivWithin I I' f s x, h.hasMFDerivWithinAt⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact hf'.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) {t : Set M}
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
(h.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) {t : Set M}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set M} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
| ⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
protected theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f :) ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 726 | 731 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Basic
/-!
# Idempotent complete categories
In this file, we define the notion of idempotent complete categories
(also known as Karoubian categories, or pseudoabelian in the case of
preadditive categories).
## Main definitions
- `IsIdempotentComplete C` expresses that `C` is idempotent complete, i.e.
all idempotents in `C` split. Other characterisations of idempotent completeness are given
by `isIdempotentComplete_iff_hasEqualizer_of_id_and_idempotent` and
`isIdempotentComplete_iff_idempotents_have_kernels`.
- `isIdempotentComplete_of_abelian` expresses that abelian categories are
idempotent complete.
- `isIdempotentComplete_iff_ofEquivalence` expresses that if two categories `C` and `D`
are equivalent, then `C` is idempotent complete iff `D` is.
- `isIdempotentComplete_iff_opposite` expresses that `Cᵒᵖ` is idempotent complete
iff `C` is.
## References
* [Stacks: Karoubian categories] https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/09SF
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
/-- A category is idempotent complete iff all idempotent endomorphisms `p`
split as a composition `p = e ≫ i` with `i ≫ e = 𝟙 _` -/
class IsIdempotentComplete : Prop where
/-- A category is idempotent complete iff all idempotent endomorphisms `p`
split as a composition `p = e ≫ i` with `i ≫ e = 𝟙 _` -/
idempotents_split :
∀ (X : C) (p : X ⟶ X), p ≫ p = p → ∃ (Y : C) (i : Y ⟶ X) (e : X ⟶ Y), i ≫ e = 𝟙 Y ∧ e ≫ i = p
namespace Idempotents
/-- A category is idempotent complete iff for all idempotent endomorphisms,
the equalizer of the identity and this idempotent exists. -/
theorem isIdempotentComplete_iff_hasEqualizer_of_id_and_idempotent :
IsIdempotentComplete C ↔ ∀ (X : C) (p : X ⟶ X), p ≫ p = p → HasEqualizer (𝟙 X) p := by
constructor
· intro
intro X p hp
rcases IsIdempotentComplete.idempotents_split X p hp with ⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
exact
⟨Nonempty.intro
{ cone := Fork.ofι i (show i ≫ 𝟙 X = i ≫ p by rw [comp_id, ← h₂, ← assoc, h₁, id_comp])
isLimit := by
apply Fork.IsLimit.mk'
intro s
refine ⟨s.ι ≫ e, ?_⟩
constructor
· erw [assoc, h₂, ← Limits.Fork.condition s, comp_id]
· intro m hm
rw [Fork.ι_ofι] at hm
rw [← hm]
simp only [← hm, assoc, h₁]
exact (comp_id m).symm }⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro X p hp
haveI : HasEqualizer (𝟙 X) p := h X p hp
refine ⟨equalizer (𝟙 X) p, equalizer.ι (𝟙 X) p,
equalizer.lift p (show p ≫ 𝟙 X = p ≫ p by rw [hp, comp_id]), ?_, equalizer.lift_ι _ _⟩
ext
simp only [assoc, limit.lift_π, Eq.ndrec, id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast, Fork.ofι_pt,
Fork.ofι_π_app, id_comp]
rw [← equalizer.condition, comp_id]
variable {C} in
/-- In a preadditive category, when `p : X ⟶ X` is idempotent,
then `𝟙 X - p` is also idempotent. -/
theorem idem_of_id_sub_idem [Preadditive C] {X : C} (p : X ⟶ X) (hp : p ≫ p = p) :
(𝟙 _ - p) ≫ (𝟙 _ - p) = 𝟙 _ - p := by
simp only [comp_sub, sub_comp, id_comp, comp_id, hp, sub_self, sub_zero]
/-- A preadditive category is pseudoabelian iff all idempotent endomorphisms have a kernel. -/
theorem isIdempotentComplete_iff_idempotents_have_kernels [Preadditive C] :
IsIdempotentComplete C ↔ ∀ (X : C) (p : X ⟶ X), p ≫ p = p → HasKernel p := by
rw [isIdempotentComplete_iff_hasEqualizer_of_id_and_idempotent]
constructor
· intro h X p hp
haveI : HasEqualizer (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X - p) := h X (𝟙 _ - p) (idem_of_id_sub_idem p hp)
convert hasKernel_of_hasEqualizer (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X - p)
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
· intro h X p hp
haveI : HasKernel (𝟙 _ - p) := h X (𝟙 _ - p) (idem_of_id_sub_idem p hp)
apply Preadditive.hasEqualizer_of_hasKernel
/-- An abelian category is idempotent complete. -/
instance (priority := 100) isIdempotentComplete_of_abelian (D : Type*) [Category D] [Abelian D] :
IsIdempotentComplete D := by
rw [isIdempotentComplete_iff_idempotents_have_kernels]
intros
infer_instance
variable {C}
theorem split_imp_of_iso {X X' : C} (φ : X ≅ X') (p : X ⟶ X) (p' : X' ⟶ X')
(hpp' : p ≫ φ.hom = φ.hom ≫ p')
(h : ∃ (Y : C) (i : Y ⟶ X) (e : X ⟶ Y), i ≫ e = 𝟙 Y ∧ e ≫ i = p) :
∃ (Y' : C) (i' : Y' ⟶ X') (e' : X' ⟶ Y'), i' ≫ e' = 𝟙 Y' ∧ e' ≫ i' = p' := by
rcases h with ⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
use Y, i ≫ φ.hom, φ.inv ≫ e
constructor
· slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [φ.hom_inv_id]
rw [id_comp, h₁]
· slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [h₂]
rw [hpp', ← assoc, φ.inv_hom_id, id_comp]
theorem split_iff_of_iso {X X' : C} (φ : X ≅ X') (p : X ⟶ X) (p' : X' ⟶ X')
(hpp' : p ≫ φ.hom = φ.hom ≫ p') :
(∃ (Y : C) (i : Y ⟶ X) (e : X ⟶ Y), i ≫ e = 𝟙 Y ∧ e ≫ i = p) ↔
∃ (Y' : C) (i' : Y' ⟶ X') (e' : X' ⟶ Y'), i' ≫ e' = 𝟙 Y' ∧ e' ≫ i' = p' := by
constructor
· exact split_imp_of_iso φ p p' hpp'
· apply split_imp_of_iso φ.symm p' p
rw [← comp_id p, ← φ.hom_inv_id]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [hpp']
slice_rhs 1 2 => erw [φ.inv_hom_id]
simp only [id_comp]
rfl
theorem Equivalence.isIdempotentComplete {D : Type*} [Category D] (ε : C ≌ D)
(h : IsIdempotentComplete C) : IsIdempotentComplete D := by
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro X' p hp
let φ := ε.counitIso.symm.app X'
erw [split_iff_of_iso φ p (φ.inv ≫ p ≫ φ.hom)
(by
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [φ.hom_inv_id]
rw [id_comp])]
rcases IsIdempotentComplete.idempotents_split (ε.inverse.obj X') (ε.inverse.map p)
(by rw [← ε.inverse.map_comp, hp]) with
⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
use ε.functor.obj Y, ε.functor.map i, ε.functor.map e
constructor
· rw [← ε.functor.map_comp, h₁, ε.functor.map_id]
· simp only [← ε.functor.map_comp, h₂, Equivalence.fun_inv_map]
rfl
/-- If `C` and `D` are equivalent categories, that `C` is idempotent complete iff `D` is. -/
theorem isIdempotentComplete_iff_of_equivalence {D : Type*} [Category D] (ε : C ≌ D) :
IsIdempotentComplete C ↔ IsIdempotentComplete D := by
constructor
· exact Equivalence.isIdempotentComplete ε
· exact Equivalence.isIdempotentComplete ε.symm
theorem isIdempotentComplete_of_isIdempotentComplete_opposite (h : IsIdempotentComplete Cᵒᵖ) :
IsIdempotentComplete C := by
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro X p hp
rcases IsIdempotentComplete.idempotents_split (op X) p.op (by rw [← op_comp, hp]) with
⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
use Y.unop, e.unop, i.unop
constructor
· simp only [← unop_comp, h₁]
rfl
· simp only [← unop_comp, h₂]
rfl
theorem isIdempotentComplete_iff_opposite : IsIdempotentComplete Cᵒᵖ ↔ IsIdempotentComplete C := by
constructor
· exact isIdempotentComplete_of_isIdempotentComplete_opposite
· intro h
apply isIdempotentComplete_of_isIdempotentComplete_opposite
rw [isIdempotentComplete_iff_of_equivalence (opOpEquivalence C)]
exact h
instance [IsIdempotentComplete C] : IsIdempotentComplete Cᵒᵖ := by
rwa [isIdempotentComplete_iff_opposite]
end Idempotents
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Idempotents/Basic.lean | 198 | 204 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
lemma disjoint_edgeFinset : Disjoint G₁.edgeFinset G₂.edgeFinset ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.disjoint_coe, coe_edgeFinset, disjoint_edgeSet]
lemma edgeFinset_eq_empty : G.edgeFinset = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by
rw [← edgeFinset_bot, edgeFinset_inj]
lemma edgeFinset_nonempty : G.edgeFinset.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeFinset_eq_empty.ne]
theorem edgeFinset_card : #G.edgeFinset = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : #(univ : Finset G.edgeSet) = #G.edgeFinset :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ({e | ¬e.IsDiag} : Finset _) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
#(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : #G.edgeFinset ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ := #(G.neighborFinset v)
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : #(G.neighborFinset v) = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
theorem degree_pos_iff_mem_support : 0 < G.degree v ↔ v ∈ G.support := by
rw [G.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj v, mem_support]
theorem degree_eq_zero_iff_not_mem_support : G.degree v = 0 ↔ v ∉ G.support := by
rw [← G.degree_pos_iff_mem_support v, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, not_ne_iff]
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] : #(G.incidenceFinset v) = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = {e ∈ G.edgeFinset | v ∈ e} := by
ext e
induction e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
variable {G v}
/-- If `G ≤ H` then `G.degree v ≤ H.degree v` for any vertex `v`. -/
lemma degree_le_of_le {H : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype (H.neighborSet v)] (hle : G ≤ H) :
G.degree v ≤ H.degree v := by
simp_rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card fun v hv => hle hv
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
variable {G}
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
intro v
rw [degree_compl, h v]
end LocallyFinite
section Finite
variable [Fintype V]
instance neighborSetFintype [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : Fintype (G.neighborSet v) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ (· ∈ G.neighborSet v)
(by
simp_rw [mem_neighborSet]
infer_instance)
_
theorem neighborFinset_eq_filter {v : V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
G.neighborFinset v = ({w | G.Adj v w} : Finset _) := by ext; simp
| theorem neighborFinset_compl [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
simp only [neighborFinset, neighborSet_compl, Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_compl,
Set.toFinset_singleton]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 267 | 270 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PurelyInseparable.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PerfectClosure
/-!
# `IsPerfectClosure` predicate
This file contains `IsPerfectClosure` which asserts that `L` is a perfect closure of `K` under a
ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L`, as well as its basic properties.
## Main definitions
- `pNilradical`: given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`).
- `IsPRadical`: a ring homomorphism `i : K →+* L` of characteristic `p` rings is called `p`-radical,
if or any element `x` of `L` there is `n : ℕ` such that `x ^ (p ^ n)` is contained in `K`,
and the kernel of `i` is contained in the `p`-nilradical of `K`.
A generalization of purely inseparable extension for fields.
- `IsPerfectClosure`: if `i : K →+* L` is `p`-radical ring homomorphism, then it makes `L` a
perfect closure of `K`, if `L` is perfect.
Our definition makes it synonymous to `IsPRadical` if `PerfectRing L p` is present. A caveat is
that you need to write `[PerfectRing L p] [IsPerfectClosure i p]`. This is similar to
`PerfectRing` which has `ExpChar` as a prerequisite.
- `PerfectRing.lift`: if a `p`-radical ring homomorphism `K →+* L` is given, `M` is a perfect ring,
then any ring homomorphism `K →+* M` can be lifted to `L →+* M`.
This is similar to `IsAlgClosed.lift` and `IsSepClosed.lift`.
- `PerfectRing.liftEquiv`: `K →+* M` is one-to-one correspondence to `L →+* M`,
given by `PerfectRing.lift`. This is a generalization to `PerfectClosure.lift`.
- `IsPerfectClosure.equiv`: perfect closures of a ring are isomorphic.
## Main results
- `IsPRadical.trans`: composition of `p`-radical ring homomorphisms is also `p`-radical.
- `PerfectClosure.isPRadical`: the absolute perfect closure `PerfectClosure` is a `p`-radical
extension over the base ring, in particular, it is a perfect closure of the base ring.
- `IsPRadical.isPurelyInseparable`, `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical`: `p`-radical and
purely inseparable are equivalent for fields.
- The (relative) perfect closure `perfectClosure` is a perfect closure
(inferred from `IsPurelyInseparable.isPRadical` automatically by Lean).
## Tags
perfect ring, perfect closure, purely inseparable
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
/-- Given a natural number `p`, the `p`-nilradical of a ring is defined to be the
nilradical if `p > 1` (`pNilradical_eq_nilradical`), and defined to be the zero ideal if `p ≤ 1`
(`pNilradical_eq_bot'`). Equivalently, it is the ideal consisting of elements `x` such that
`x ^ p ^ n = 0` for some `n` (`mem_pNilradical`). -/
def pNilradical (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (p : ℕ) : Ideal R := if 1 < p then nilradical R else ⊥
theorem pNilradical_le_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} :
pNilradical R p ≤ nilradical R := by
| by_cases hp : 1 < p
· rw [pNilradical, if_pos hp]
simp_rw [pNilradical, if_neg hp, bot_le]
theorem pNilradical_eq_nilradical {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) :
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IsPerfectClosure.lean | 75 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.CircleMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### Facts about `circleMap`
-/
/-- The range of `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : range (circleMap c R) = sphere c |R| :=
calc
range (circleMap c R) = c +ᵥ R • range fun θ : ℝ => exp (θ * I) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [← image_vadd, ← image_smul, ← range_comp,
vadd_eq_add, circleMap, comp_def, real_smul]
_ = sphere c |R| := by
rw [range_exp_mul_I, smul_sphere R 0 zero_le_one]
simp
/-- The image of `(0, 2π]` under `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem image_circleMap_Ioc (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : circleMap c R '' Ioc 0 (2 * π) = sphere c |R| := by
rw [← range_circleMap, ← (periodic_circleMap c R).image_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos 0, zero_add]
theorem hasDerivAt_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (circleMap c R) (circleMap 0 R θ * I) θ := by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, ofRealCLM_apply, circleMap, ofReal_one, zero_add]
using (((ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt (x := θ)).mul_const I).cexp.const_mul (R : ℂ)).const_add c
theorem differentiable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (circleMap c R) := fun θ =>
(hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).differentiableAt
/-- The circleMap is real analytic. -/
theorem analyticOnNhd_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
AnalyticOnNhd ℝ (circleMap c R) Set.univ := by
intro z hz
apply analyticAt_const.add
apply analyticAt_const.mul
rw [← Function.comp_def]
apply analyticAt_cexp.restrictScalars.comp ((ofRealCLM.analyticAt z).mul (by fun_prop))
/-- The circleMap is continuously differentiable. -/
theorem contDiff_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiff ℝ n (circleMap c R) :=
(analyticOnNhd_circleMap c R).contDiff
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Continuous (circleMap c R) :=
(differentiable_circleMap c R).continuous
@[fun_prop, measurability]
theorem measurable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Measurable (circleMap c R) :=
(continuous_circleMap c R).measurable
@[simp]
theorem deriv_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : deriv (circleMap c R) θ = circleMap 0 R θ * I :=
(hasDerivAt_circleMap _ _ _).deriv
theorem deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ = 0 ↔ R = 0 := by simp [I_ne_zero]
theorem deriv_circleMap_ne_zero {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {θ : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
deriv (circleMap c R) θ ≠ 0 :=
mt deriv_circleMap_eq_zero_iff.1 hR
theorem lipschitzWith_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : LipschitzWith (Real.nnabs R) (circleMap c R) :=
lipschitzWith_of_nnnorm_deriv_le (differentiable_circleMap _ _) fun θ =>
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by simp
theorem continuous_circleMap_inv {R : ℝ} {z w : ℂ} (hw : w ∈ ball z R) :
Continuous fun θ => (circleMap z R θ - w)⁻¹ := by
have : ∀ θ, circleMap z R θ - w ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [sub_ne_zero]
exact fun θ => circleMap_ne_mem_ball hw θ
-- Porting note: was `continuity`
exact Continuous.inv₀ (by fun_prop) this
theorem circleMap_preimage_codiscrete {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
map (circleMap c R) (codiscrete ℝ) ≤ codiscreteWithin (Metric.sphere c |R|) := by
intro s hs
apply (analyticOnNhd_circleMap c R).preimage_mem_codiscreteWithin
· intro x hx
by_contra hCon
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := eventuallyConst_iff_exists_eventuallyEq.1 hCon
have := ha.deriv.eq_of_nhds
simp [hR] at this
· rwa [Set.image_univ, range_circleMap]
/-!
### Integrability of a function on a circle
-/
/-- We say that a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and radius `R` if
the function `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`.
Note that the actual function used in the definition of `circleIntegral` is
`(deriv (circleMap c R) θ) • f (circleMap c R θ)`. Integrability of this function is equivalent
to integrability of `f ∘ circleMap c R` whenever `R ≠ 0`. -/
def CircleIntegrable (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Prop :=
IntervalIntegrable (fun θ : ℝ => f (circleMap c R θ)) volume 0 (2 * π)
@[simp]
theorem circleIntegrable_const (a : E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : CircleIntegrable (fun _ => a) c R :=
intervalIntegrable_const
namespace CircleIntegrable
variable {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ}
nonrec theorem add (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R) (hg : CircleIntegrable g c R) :
CircleIntegrable (f + g) c R :=
hf.add hg
nonrec theorem neg (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R) : CircleIntegrable (-f) c R :=
hf.neg
/-- The function we actually integrate over `[0, 2π]` in the definition of `circleIntegral` is
integrable. -/
theorem out [NormedSpace ℂ E] (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun θ : ℝ => deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)) volume 0
(2 * π) := by
simp only [CircleIntegrable, deriv_circleMap, intervalIntegrable_iff] at *
refine (hf.norm.const_mul |R|).mono' ?_ ?_
· exact ((continuous_circleMap _ _).aestronglyMeasurable.mul_const I).smul hf.aestronglyMeasurable
· simp [norm_smul]
end CircleIntegrable
@[simp]
theorem circleIntegrable_zero_radius {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} : CircleIntegrable f c 0 := by
simp [CircleIntegrable]
/-- Circle integrability is invariant when functions change along discrete sets. -/
theorem CircleIntegrable.congr_codiscreteWithin {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {f₁ f₂ : ℂ → ℂ}
(hf : f₁ =ᶠ[codiscreteWithin (Metric.sphere c |R|)] f₂) (hf₁ : CircleIntegrable f₁ c R) :
CircleIntegrable f₂ c R := by
by_cases hR : R = 0
· simp [hR]
apply (intervalIntegrable_congr_codiscreteWithin _).1 hf₁
rw [eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem]
exact ⟨(circleMap c R)⁻¹' {z | f₁ z = f₂ z},
codiscreteWithin.mono (by simp only [Set.subset_univ]) (circleMap_preimage_codiscrete hR hf),
by tauto⟩
/-- Circle integrability is invariant when functions change along discrete sets. -/
theorem circleIntegrable_congr_codiscreteWithin {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {f₁ f₂ : ℂ → ℂ}
(hf : f₁ =ᶠ[codiscreteWithin (Metric.sphere c |R|)] f₂) :
CircleIntegrable f₁ c R ↔ CircleIntegrable f₂ c R :=
⟨(CircleIntegrable.congr_codiscreteWithin hf ·),
(CircleIntegrable.congr_codiscreteWithin hf.symm ·)⟩
theorem circleIntegrable_iff [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} (R : ℝ) :
CircleIntegrable f c R ↔ IntervalIntegrable (fun θ : ℝ =>
deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)) volume 0 (2 * π) := by
by_cases h₀ : R = 0
· simp +unfoldPartialApp [h₀, const]
refine ⟨fun h => h.out, fun h => ?_⟩
simp only [CircleIntegrable, intervalIntegrable_iff, deriv_circleMap] at h ⊢
refine (h.norm.const_mul |R|⁻¹).mono' ?_ ?_
· have H : ∀ {θ}, circleMap 0 R θ * I ≠ 0 := fun {θ} => by simp [h₀, I_ne_zero]
simpa only [inv_smul_smul₀ H]
using ((continuous_circleMap 0 R).aestronglyMeasurable.mul_const
I).aemeasurable.inv.aestronglyMeasurable.smul h.aestronglyMeasurable
· simp [norm_smul, h₀]
theorem ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable' {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (sphere c |R|)) : CircleIntegrable f c R :=
(hf.comp_continuous (continuous_circleMap _ _) (circleMap_mem_sphere' _ _)).intervalIntegrable _ _
theorem ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R)
(hf : ContinuousOn f (sphere c R)) : CircleIntegrable f c R :=
ContinuousOn.circleIntegrable' <| (abs_of_nonneg hR).symm ▸ hf
/-- The function `fun z ↦ (z - w) ^ n`, `n : ℤ`, is circle integrable on the circle with center `c`
and radius `|R|` if and only if `R = 0` or `0 ≤ n`, or `w` does not belong to this circle. -/
@[simp]
theorem circleIntegrable_sub_zpow_iff {c w : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {n : ℤ} :
CircleIntegrable (fun z => (z - w) ^ n) c R ↔ R = 0 ∨ 0 ≤ n ∨ w ∉ sphere c |R| := by
constructor
· intro h; contrapose! h; rcases h with ⟨hR, hn, hw⟩
simp only [circleIntegrable_iff R, deriv_circleMap]
rw [← image_circleMap_Ioc] at hw; rcases hw with ⟨θ, hθ, rfl⟩
replace hθ : θ ∈ [[0, 2 * π]] := Icc_subset_uIcc (Ioc_subset_Icc_self hθ)
refine not_intervalIntegrable_of_sub_inv_isBigO_punctured ?_ Real.two_pi_pos.ne hθ
set f : ℝ → ℂ := fun θ' => circleMap c R θ' - circleMap c R θ
have : ∀ᶠ θ' in 𝓝[≠] θ, f θ' ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) 1 \ {0} := by
suffices ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] circleMap c R θ, z - circleMap c R θ ∈ ball (0 : ℂ) 1 \ {0} from
((differentiable_circleMap c R θ).hasDerivAt.tendsto_nhdsNE
(deriv_circleMap_ne_zero hR)).eventually this
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)]
simp_all [dist_eq, sub_eq_zero]
refine (((hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).isBigO_sub.mono inf_le_left).inv_rev
(this.mono fun θ' h₁ h₂ => absurd h₂ h₁.2)).trans ?_
refine IsBigO.of_bound |R|⁻¹ (this.mono fun θ' hθ' => ?_)
set x := ‖f θ'‖
suffices x⁻¹ ≤ x ^ n by
simp only [inv_mul_cancel_left₀, abs_eq_zero.not.2 hR, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, norm_mul,
norm_inv, norm_I, mul_one]
simpa only [norm_circleMap_zero, norm_zpow, Ne, abs_eq_zero.not.2 hR, not_false_iff,
inv_mul_cancel_left₀] using this
have : x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 := by simpa [x, and_comm] using hθ'
rw [← zpow_neg_one]
refine (zpow_right_strictAnti₀ this.1 this.2).le_iff_le.2 (Int.lt_add_one_iff.1 ?_); exact hn
· rintro (rfl | H)
exacts [circleIntegrable_zero_radius,
((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).zpow₀ _ fun z hz =>
H.symm.imp_left fun (hw : w ∉ sphere c |R|) =>
sub_ne_zero.2 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hz hw).circleIntegrable']
@[simp]
theorem circleIntegrable_sub_inv_iff {c w : ℂ} {R : ℝ} :
CircleIntegrable (fun z => (z - w)⁻¹) c R ↔ R = 0 ∨ w ∉ sphere c |R| := by
simp only [← zpow_neg_one, circleIntegrable_sub_zpow_iff]; norm_num
variable [NormedSpace ℂ E]
/-- Definition for $\oint_{|z-c|=R} f(z)\,dz$ -/
def circleIntegral (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : E :=
∫ θ : ℝ in (0)..2 * π, deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)
/-- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` is the circle integral $\oint_{|z-c|=R} f(z)\,dz$. -/
notation3 "∮ "(...)" in ""C("c", "R")"", "r:(scoped f => circleIntegral f c R) => r
theorem circleIntegral_def_Icc (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∫ θ in Icc 0 (2 * π),
deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ) := by
rw [circleIntegral, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Real.two_pi_pos.le,
Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioc_ae_eq_Icc]
namespace circleIntegral
@[simp]
theorem integral_radius_zero (f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) : (∮ z in C(c, 0), f z) = 0 := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [circleIntegral, const]
theorem integral_congr {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R) (h : EqOn f g (sphere c R)) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), g z :=
intervalIntegral.integral_congr fun θ _ => by simp only [h (circleMap_mem_sphere _ hR _)]
/-- Circle integrals are invariant when functions change along discrete sets. -/
theorem circleIntegral_congr_codiscreteWithin {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} {f₁ f₂ : ℂ → ℂ}
(hf : f₁ =ᶠ[codiscreteWithin (Metric.sphere c |R|)] f₂) (hR : R ≠ 0) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f₁ z) = (∮ z in C(c, R), f₂ z) := by
apply intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae_restrict
apply ae_restrict_le_codiscreteWithin measurableSet_uIoc
simp only [deriv_circleMap, smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, mul_eq_zero,
circleMap_eq_center_iff, hR, Complex.I_ne_zero, or_self, or_false]
exact codiscreteWithin.mono (by tauto) (circleMap_preimage_codiscrete hR hf)
theorem integral_sub_inv_smul_sub_smul (f : ℂ → E) (c w : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • (z - w) • f z) = ∮ z in C(c, R), f z := by
rcases eq_or_ne R 0 with (rfl | hR); · simp only [integral_radius_zero]
have : (circleMap c R ⁻¹' {w}).Countable := (countable_singleton _).preimage_circleMap c hR
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae ((this.ae_not_mem _).mono fun θ hθ _' => ?_)
change circleMap c R θ ≠ w at hθ
simp only [inv_smul_smul₀ (sub_ne_zero.2 <| hθ)]
theorem integral_undef {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hf : ¬CircleIntegrable f c R) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z) = 0 :=
intervalIntegral.integral_undef (mt (circleIntegrable_iff R).mpr hf)
theorem integral_add {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R)
(hg : CircleIntegrable g c R) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z + g z) = (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) + (∮ z in C(c, R), g z) := by
simp only [circleIntegral, smul_add, intervalIntegral.integral_add hf.out hg.out]
theorem integral_sub {f g : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hf : CircleIntegrable f c R)
(hg : CircleIntegrable g c R) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z - g z) = (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) - ∮ z in C(c, R), g z := by
simp only [circleIntegral, smul_sub, intervalIntegral.integral_sub hf.out hg.out]
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c |R|, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) : ‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ 2 * π * |R| * C :=
calc
‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ |R| * C * |2 * π - 0| :=
intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const fun θ _ =>
calc
‖deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)‖ = |R| * ‖f (circleMap c R θ)‖ := by
simp [norm_smul]
_ ≤ |R| * C :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf _ <| circleMap_mem_sphere' _ _ _) (abs_nonneg _)
_ = 2 * π * |R| * C := by rw [sub_zero, _root_.abs_of_pos Real.two_pi_pos]; ac_rfl
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R)
(hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) : ‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ 2 * π * R * C :=
have : |R| = R := abs_of_nonneg hR
calc
‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ 2 * π * |R| * C := norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const' <| by rwa [this]
_ = 2 * π * R * C := by rw [this]
theorem norm_two_pi_i_inv_smul_integral_le_of_norm_le_const {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ}
(hR : 0 ≤ R) (hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) :
‖(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ R * C := by
have : ‖(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹‖ = (2 * π)⁻¹ := by simp [Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [norm_smul, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff₀ Real.two_pi_pos, mul_comm (R * C), ← mul_assoc]
exact norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hR hf
/-- If `f` is continuous on the circle `|z - c| = R`, `R > 0`, the `‖f z‖` is less than or equal to
`C : ℝ` on this circle, and this norm is strictly less than `C` at some point `z` of the circle,
then `‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ < 2 * π * R * C`. -/
theorem norm_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const_of_lt {f : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R C : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (sphere c R)) (hf : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, ‖f z‖ ≤ C)
(hlt : ∃ z ∈ sphere c R, ‖f z‖ < C) : ‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ < 2 * π * R * C := by
rw [← _root_.abs_of_pos hR, ← image_circleMap_Ioc] at hlt
rcases hlt with ⟨_, ⟨θ₀, hmem, rfl⟩, hlt⟩
calc
‖∮ z in C(c, R), f z‖ ≤ ∫ θ in (0)..2 * π, ‖deriv (circleMap c R) θ • f (circleMap c R θ)‖ :=
intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm Real.two_pi_pos.le
_ < ∫ _ in (0)..2 * π, R * C := by
simp only [deriv_circleMap, norm_smul, norm_mul, norm_circleMap_zero, abs_of_pos hR, norm_I,
mul_one]
refine intervalIntegral.integral_lt_integral_of_continuousOn_of_le_of_exists_lt
Real.two_pi_pos ?_ continuousOn_const (fun θ _ => ?_) ⟨θ₀, Ioc_subset_Icc_self hmem, ?_⟩
· exact continuousOn_const.mul (hc.comp (continuous_circleMap _ _).continuousOn fun θ _ =>
circleMap_mem_sphere _ hR.le _).norm
· exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf _ <| circleMap_mem_sphere _ hR.le _) hR.le
· exact (mul_lt_mul_left hR).2 hlt
_ = 2 * π * R * C := by simp [mul_assoc]; ring
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 ℂ E] (a : 𝕜)
(f : ℂ → E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : (∮ z in C(c, R), a • f z) = a • ∮ z in C(c, R), f z := by
simp only [circleIntegral, ← smul_comm a (_ : ℂ) (_ : E), intervalIntegral.integral_smul]
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul_const [CompleteSpace E] (f : ℂ → ℂ) (a : E) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f z • a) = (∮ z in C(c, R), f z) • a := by
simp only [circleIntegral, intervalIntegral.integral_smul_const, ← smul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem integral_const_mul (a : ℂ) (f : ℂ → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), a * f z) = a * ∮ z in C(c, R), f z :=
integral_smul a f c R
@[simp]
theorem integral_sub_center_inv (c : ℂ) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - c)⁻¹) = 2 * π * I := by
simp [circleIntegral, ← div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (circleMap_ne_center hR)]
/-- If `f' : ℂ → E` is a derivative of a complex differentiable function on the circle
`Metric.sphere c |R|`, then `∮ z in C(c, R), f' z = 0`. -/
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivWithinAt' [CompleteSpace E] {f f' : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ}
(h : ∀ z ∈ sphere c |R|, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' z) (sphere c |R|) z) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), f' z) = 0 := by
by_cases hi : CircleIntegrable f' c R
· rw [← sub_eq_zero.2 ((periodic_circleMap c R).comp f).eq]
refine intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun θ _ => ?_) hi.out
exact (h _ (circleMap_mem_sphere' _ _ _)).scomp_hasDerivAt θ
(differentiable_circleMap _ _ _).hasDerivAt (circleMap_mem_sphere' _ _)
· exact integral_undef hi
/-- If `f' : ℂ → E` is a derivative of a complex differentiable function on the circle
`Metric.sphere c R`, then `∮ z in C(c, R), f' z = 0`. -/
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivWithinAt [CompleteSpace E]
{f f' : ℂ → E} {c : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 ≤ R)
(h : ∀ z ∈ sphere c R, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' z) (sphere c R) z) : (∮ z in C(c, R), f' z) = 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivWithinAt' <| (abs_of_nonneg hR).symm ▸ h
/-- If `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`, then `(z - w) ^ n` is not circle integrable on the circle with
center `c` and radius `|R|`, so the integral `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n` is equal to zero. -/
theorem integral_sub_zpow_of_undef {n : ℤ} {c w : ℂ} {R : ℝ} (hn : n < 0)
(hw : w ∈ sphere c |R|) : (∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n) = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne R 0 with (rfl | h0)
· apply integral_radius_zero
· apply integral_undef
simpa [circleIntegrable_sub_zpow_iff, *, not_or]
/-- If `n ≠ -1` is an integer number, then the integral of `(z - w) ^ n` over the circle equals
zero. -/
theorem integral_sub_zpow_of_ne {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ -1) (c w : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
(∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n) = 0 := by
rcases em (w ∈ sphere c |R| ∧ n < -1) with (⟨hw, hn⟩ | H)
· exact integral_sub_zpow_of_undef (hn.trans (by decide)) hw
push_neg at H
have hd : ∀ z, z ≠ w ∨ -1 ≤ n →
HasDerivAt (fun z => (z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)) ((z - w) ^ n) z := by
intro z hne
convert ((hasDerivAt_zpow (n + 1) _ (hne.imp _ _)).comp z
((hasDerivAt_id z).sub_const w)).div_const _ using 1
· have hn' : (n + 1 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [Ne, ← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_inj]
| simp [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hn']
exacts [sub_ne_zero.2, neg_le_iff_add_nonneg.1]
refine integral_eq_zero_of_hasDerivWithinAt' fun z hz => (hd z ?_).hasDerivWithinAt
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 450 | 452 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 3,285 | 3,286 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Antidiag.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Main definitions
- `MvPowerSeries.C`: constant power series
- `MvPowerSeries.X`: the indeterminates
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff`, `MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff`:
the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries`, its constant coefficient
- `MvPowerSeries.monomial`: the monomials
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul`: computes the coefficients of the product of two `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_prod` : computes the coefficients of products of `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_pow` : computes the coefficients of powers of a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_nilpotent`: if the constant coefficient
of a `MvPowerSeries` is nilpotent, then some coefficients of its powers are automatically zero
- `MvPowerSeries.map`: apply a `RingHom` to the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries` (as a `RingHom)
- `MvPowerSeries.X_pow_dvd_iff`, `MvPowerSeries.X_dvd_iff`: equivalent
conditions for (a power of) an indeterminate to divide a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPolynomial.toMvPowerSeries`: the canonical coercion from `MvPolynomial` to `MvPowerSeries`
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
theorem coeff_apply (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R d f = f d :=
rfl
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
dsimp only [coeff, MvPowerSeries]
rw [monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m), LinearMap.single_apply, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_same _ _
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_coeff_zero {f : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
f = 0 ↔ (∀ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f = 0) :=
MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff_exists_coeff_ne_zero (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
f ≠ 0 ↔ (∃ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f ≠ 0) := by
simp only [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff, ne_eq, coeff_zero, not_forall]
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
| exact le_add_left le_rfl
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 259 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 997 | 1,005 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.MvPolynomial
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Cramer's rule and adjugate matrices
The adjugate matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.
It is calculated with Cramer's rule, which we introduce first.
The vectors returned by Cramer's rule are given by the linear map `cramer`,
which sends a matrix `A` and vector `b` to the vector consisting of the
determinant of replacing the `i`th column of `A` with `b` at index `i`
(written as `(A.update_column i b).det`).
Using Cramer's rule, we can compute for each matrix `A` the matrix `adjugate A`.
The entries of the adjugate are the minors of `A`.
Instead of defining a minor by deleting row `i` and column `j` of `A`, we
replace the `i`th row of `A` with the `j`th basis vector; the resulting matrix
has the same determinant but more importantly equals Cramer's rule applied
to `A` and the `j`th basis vector, simplifying the subsequent proofs.
We prove the adjugate behaves like `det A • A⁻¹`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.cramer A b`: the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
* `Matrix.adjugate A`: the adjugate (or classical adjoint) of the matrix `A`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u v w
variable {m : Type u} {n : Type v} {α : Type w}
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [CommRing α]
open Matrix Polynomial Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
section Cramer
/-!
### `cramer` section
Introduce the linear map `cramer` with values defined by `cramerMap`.
After defining `cramerMap` and showing it is linear,
we will restrict our proofs to using `cramer`.
-/
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (b : n → α)
/-- `cramerMap A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramerMap A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A * x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramerMap A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramerMap` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramerMap (i : n) : α :=
(A.updateCol i b).det
theorem cramerMap_is_linear (i : n) : IsLinearMap α fun b => cramerMap A b i :=
{ map_add := det_updateCol_add _ _
map_smul := det_updateCol_smul _ _ }
theorem cramer_is_linear : IsLinearMap α (cramerMap A) := by
constructor <;> intros <;> ext i
· apply (cramerMap_is_linear A i).1
· apply (cramerMap_is_linear A i).2
/-- `cramer A b i` is the determinant of the matrix `A` with column `i` replaced with `b`,
and thus `cramer A b` is the vector output by Cramer's rule on `A` and `b`.
If `A * x = b` has a unique solution in `x`, `cramer A` sends the vector `b` to `A.det • x`.
Otherwise, the outcome of `cramer` is well-defined but not necessarily useful.
-/
def cramer (A : Matrix n n α) : (n → α) →ₗ[α] (n → α) :=
IsLinearMap.mk' (cramerMap A) (cramer_is_linear A)
theorem cramer_apply (i : n) : cramer A b i = (A.updateCol i b).det :=
rfl
theorem cramer_transpose_apply (i : n) : cramer Aᵀ b i = (A.updateRow i b).det := by
rw [cramer_apply, updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
theorem cramer_transpose_row_self (i : n) : Aᵀ.cramer (A i) = Pi.single i A.det := by
ext j
rw [cramer_apply, Pi.single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· -- i = j: this entry should be `A.det`
subst h
simp only [updateCol_transpose, det_transpose, updateRow_eq_self]
· -- i ≠ j: this entry should be 0
rw [updateCol_transpose, det_transpose]
apply det_zero_of_row_eq h
rw [updateRow_self, updateRow_ne (Ne.symm h)]
theorem cramer_row_self (i : n) (h : ∀ j, b j = A j i) : A.cramer b = Pi.single i A.det := by
rw [← transpose_transpose A, det_transpose]
convert cramer_transpose_row_self Aᵀ i
exact funext h
@[simp]
theorem cramer_one : cramer (1 : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext i j
| convert congr_fun (cramer_row_self (1 : Matrix n n α) (Pi.single i 1) i _) j
· simp
· intro j
rw [Matrix.one_eq_pi_single, Pi.single_comm]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Adjugate.lean | 119 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open CharZero Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← exp_conj, map_ofNat, div_neg,
neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div, -neg_add_rev, ← neg_add]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
Hurwitz zeta function). See `oddKernel_def` for the defining formula, and `hasSum_int_oddKernel`
for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`.
-/
@[irreducible] def oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun a : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x))) 1 by
intro a; simp [jacobiTheta₂''_add_left]).lift a
lemma oddKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel a x) = jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x) := by
simp [oddKernel, ← conj_eq_iff_re, jacobiTheta₂''_conj]
lemma oddKernel_def' (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) *
(jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (I * x) / (2 * π * I) + a * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x)) := by
rw [oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'', ← mul_assoc ↑a I x,
(by ring : ↑π * I * ↑a ^ 2 * (I * ↑x) = I ^ 2 * ↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * x), I_sq, neg_one_mul]
lemma oddKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : oddKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, oddKernel_def', jacobiTheta₂_undef, jacobiTheta₂'_undef, zero_div, zero_add,
mul_zero, mul_zero] <;>
simpa
/-- Auxiliary function appearing in the functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta kernel, equal
to `∑ (n : ℕ), 2 * n * sin (2 * π * n * a) * exp (-π * n ^ 2 * x)`. See `hasSum_nat_sinKernel`
for the defining sum. -/
@[irreducible] def sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂' ξ (I * x) / (-2 * π))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂'_add_left]).lift a
lemma sinKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(sinKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂' a (I * x) / (-2 * π) := by
simp [sinKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂'_conj, map_ofNat]
lemma sinKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : sinKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simpa), zero_div]
| lemma oddKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : oddKernel (-a) x = -oddKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 138 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Commute
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Even and odd elements in rings
This file defines odd elements and proves some general facts about even and odd elements of rings.
As opposed to `Even`, `Odd` does not have a multiplicative counterpart.
## TODO
Try to generalize `Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas whose `Semiring`
assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary. If that turns out to be true, they could be moved
to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even`.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even` for the definition of even elements.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered OrderedRing
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma Even.neg_pow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a
simp_rw [← two_mul, pow_mul, neg_sq]
lemma Even.neg_one_pow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a : α} {n : ℤ}
lemma Even.neg_zpow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [← Int.two_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_two, neg_mul_neg]
lemma Even.neg_one_zpow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_zpow, one_zpow]
end DivisionMonoid
@[simp] lemma IsSquare.zero [MulZeroClass α] : IsSquare (0 : α) := ⟨0, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [Semiring β] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma even_iff_exists_two_mul : Even a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b := by simp [even_iff_exists_two_nsmul]
lemma even_iff_two_dvd : Even a ↔ 2 ∣ a := by simp [Even, Dvd.dvd, two_mul]
alias ⟨Even.two_dvd, _⟩ := even_iff_two_dvd
lemma Even.trans_dvd (ha : Even a) (hab : a ∣ b) : Even b :=
even_iff_two_dvd.2 <| ha.two_dvd.trans hab
lemma Dvd.dvd.even (hab : a ∣ b) (ha : Even a) : Even b := ha.trans_dvd hab
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul (α) [NonAssocSemiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x) = {a | Even a} := by
ext x
simp [eq_comm, two_mul, Even]
@[simp] lemma even_two : Even (2 : α) := ⟨1, by rw [one_add_one_eq_two]⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_left (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (b * a) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft _)
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_right (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (a * b) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight _)
lemma even_two_mul (a : α) : Even (2 * a) := ⟨a, two_mul _⟩
lemma Even.pow_of_ne_zero (ha : Even a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → Even (a ^ n)
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.mul_left _
/-- An element `a` of a semiring is odd if there exists `k` such `a = 2*k + 1`. -/
def Odd (a : α) : Prop := ∃ k, a = 2 * k + 1
lemma odd_iff_exists_bit1 : Odd a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b + 1 := exists_congr fun b ↦ by rw [two_mul]
alias ⟨Odd.exists_bit1, _⟩ := odd_iff_exists_bit1
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul_add_one (α : Type*) [Semiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x + 1) = {a | Odd a} := by ext x; simp [Odd, eq_comm]
lemma Even.add_odd : Even a → Odd b → Odd (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨a + b, by rw [mul_add, ← two_mul, add_assoc]⟩
lemma Even.odd_add (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (b + a) := add_comm a b ▸ ha.add_odd hb
lemma Odd.add_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a + b) := add_comm a b ▸ hb.add_odd ha
lemma Odd.add_odd : Odd a → Odd b → Even (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a + b + 1, ?_⟩
rw [two_mul, two_mul]
ac_rfl
@[simp] lemma odd_one : Odd (1 : α) :=
⟨0, (zero_add _).symm.trans (congr_arg (· + (1 : α)) (mul_zero _).symm)⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.add_one (h : Even a) : Odd (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Even.one_add (h : Even a) : Odd (1 + a) := h.odd_add odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.add_one (h : Odd a) : Even (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.one_add (h : Odd a) : Even (1 + a) := odd_one.add_odd h
lemma odd_two_mul_add_one (a : α) : Odd (2 * a + 1) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma odd_add_self_one' : Odd (a + (a + 1)) := by simp [← add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self : Odd (a + 1 + a) := by simp [add_comm _ a]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self' : Odd (a + (1 + a)) := by simp [add_comm 1 a]
lemma Odd.map [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] (f : F) : Odd a → Odd (f a) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨f a, by simp [two_mul]⟩
lemma Odd.natCast {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Odd (n : R) :=
hn.map <| Nat.castRingHom R
@[simp] lemma Odd.mul : Odd a → Odd b → Odd (a * b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨2 * a * b + b + a, ?_⟩
rw [mul_add, add_mul, mul_one, ← add_assoc, one_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc,
← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_comm]
lemma Odd.pow (ha : Odd a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Odd (a ^ n)
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact odd_one
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.pow.mul ha
lemma Odd.pow_add_pow_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd α] (hn : Odd n) (hab : a + b = 0) :
a ^ n + b ^ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
induction k with | zero => simpa | succ k ih => ?_
have : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := add_right_cancel <|
calc
a ^ 2 + a * b = 0 := by rw [sq, ← mul_add, hab, mul_zero]
_ = b ^ 2 + a * b := by rw [sq, ← add_mul, add_comm, hab, zero_mul]
refine add_right_cancel (b := b ^ (2 * k + 1) * a ^ 2) ?_
calc
_ = (a ^ (2 * k + 1) + b ^ (2 * k + 1)) * a ^ 2 + b ^ (2 * k + 3) := by
rw [add_mul, ← pow_add, add_right_comm]; rfl
_ = _ := by rw [ih, zero_mul, zero_add, zero_add, this, ← pow_add]
end Semiring
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ}
lemma Odd.neg_pow : Odd n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = -a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [pow_add, pow_mul, neg_sq, pow_one, mul_neg]
@[simp] lemma Odd.neg_one_pow (h : Odd n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = -1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section Ring
variable [Ring α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ}
lemma even_neg_two : Even (-2 : α) := by simp only [even_neg, even_two]
lemma Odd.neg (hp : Odd a) : Odd (-a) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hp
use -(k + 1)
rw [mul_neg, mul_add, neg_add, add_assoc, two_mul (1 : α), neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right,
← neg_add, hk]
@[simp] lemma odd_neg : Odd (-a) ↔ Odd a := ⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg a ▸ h.neg, Odd.neg⟩
lemma odd_neg_one : Odd (-1 : α) := by simp
lemma Odd.sub_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_even hb.neg
lemma Even.sub_odd (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
lemma Odd.sub_odd (ha : Odd a) (hb : Odd b) : Even (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
end Ring
namespace Nat
variable {m n : ℕ}
lemma odd_iff : Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ↦ by omega, fun h ↦ ⟨n / 2, (mod_add_div n 2).symm.trans (by rw [h, add_comm])⟩⟩
instance : DecidablePred (Odd : ℕ → Prop) := fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ odd_iff.symm
lemma not_odd_iff : ¬Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 0 := by rw [odd_iff, mod_two_not_eq_one]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_iff_even : ¬Odd n ↔ Even n := by rw [not_odd_iff, even_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_even_iff_odd : ¬Even n ↔ Odd n := by rw [not_even_iff, odd_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_zero : ¬Odd 0 := not_odd_iff.mpr rfl
lemma _root_.Odd.not_two_dvd_nat (h : Odd n) : ¬(2 ∣ n) := by
rwa [← even_iff_two_dvd, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma even_xor_odd (n : ℕ) : Xor' (Even n) (Odd n) := by
simp [Xor', ← not_even_iff_odd, Decidable.em (Even n)]
lemma even_or_odd (n : ℕ) : Even n ∨ Odd n := (even_xor_odd n).or
lemma even_or_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, n = 2 * k ∨ n = 2 * k + 1 := by
simpa only [← two_mul, exists_or, Odd, Even] using even_or_odd n
lemma even_xor_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, Xor' (n = 2 * k) (n = 2 * k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ | ⟨k, rfl⟩ := even_or_odd n <;> use k
· simpa only [← two_mul, eq_self_iff_true, xor_true] using (succ_ne_self (2 * k)).symm
· simpa only [xor_true, xor_comm] using (succ_ne_self _)
lemma odd_add_one {n : ℕ} : Odd (n + 1) ↔ ¬ Odd n := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, Nat.even_add_one, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : m % 2 + (m + n) % 2 = 1 :=
((even_or_odd m).elim fun hm ↦ by rw [even_iff.1 hm, odd_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]) fun hm ↦ by
rw [odd_iff.1 hm, even_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]
@[simp] lemma mod_two_add_succ_mod_two (m : ℕ) : m % 2 + (m + 1) % 2 = 1 :=
mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two m odd_one
@[simp] lemma succ_mod_two_add_mod_two (m : ℕ) : (m + 1) % 2 + m % 2 = 1 := by
rw [add_comm, mod_two_add_succ_mod_two]
| lemma even_add' : Even (m + n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Odd n) := by
rw [even_add, ← not_odd_iff_even, ← not_odd_iff_even, not_iff_not]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Parity.lean | 239 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LocalizedModule.IsLocalization
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.BaseChange
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.MvPolynomial
/-!
# Localization and multivariate polynomial rings
In this file we show some results connecting multivariate polynomial rings and localization.
## Main results
- `MvPolynomial.isLocalization`: If `S` is the localization of `R` at a submonoid `M`, then
`MvPolynomial σ S` is the localization of `MvPolynomial σ R` at the image of `M` in
`MvPolynomial σ R`.
-/
variable {σ R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R)
variable (S : Type*) [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
namespace MvPolynomial
variable [IsLocalization M S]
attribute [local instance] algebraMvPolynomial
/--
If `S` is the localization of `R` at a submonoid `M`, then `MvPolynomial σ S`
is the localization of `MvPolynomial σ R` at `M.map MvPolynomial.C`.
See also `Polynomial.isLocalization` for the univariate case. -/
instance isLocalization : IsLocalization (M.map <| C (σ := σ)) (MvPolynomial σ S) :=
isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization.mp <| (isLocalizedModule_iff_isBaseChange M S _).mpr <|
.of_equiv (algebraTensorAlgEquiv _ _).toLinearEquiv fun _ ↦ by simp
lemma isLocalization_C_mk' (a : R) (m : M) :
C (IsLocalization.mk' S a m) = IsLocalization.mk' (MvPolynomial σ S) (C (σ := σ) a)
⟨C m, Submonoid.mem_map_of_mem C m.property⟩ := by
simp_rw [IsLocalization.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, algebraMap_def, map_C, ← map_mul,
IsLocalization.mk'_spec]
end MvPolynomial
namespace IsLocalization.Away
open MvPolynomial
variable (r : R) [IsLocalization.Away r S]
/-- The canonical algebra map from `MvPolynomial Unit R` quotiented by
`C r * X () - 1` to the localization of `R` away from `r`. -/
private noncomputable
def auxHom : (MvPolynomial Unit R) ⧸ (Ideal.span { C r * X () - 1 }) →ₐ[R] S :=
Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ (Ideal.span { C r * X () - 1}) (aeval (fun _ ↦ invSelf r)) <| by
intro p hp
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hp
· rintro p ⟨q, rfl⟩
simp
· simp
· intro p q _ _ hp hq
simp [hp, hq]
· intro a x _ hx
simp [hx]
@[simp]
private lemma auxHom_mk (p : MvPolynomial Unit R) :
auxHom S r p = aeval (S₁ := S) (fun _ ↦ invSelf r) p :=
rfl
private noncomputable
def auxInv : S →+* (MvPolynomial Unit R) ⧸ Ideal.span { C r * X () - 1 } :=
letI g : R →+* MvPolynomial Unit R ⧸ (Ideal.span { C r * X () - 1 }) :=
(Ideal.Quotient.mk _).comp C
IsLocalization.Away.lift (S := S) (g := g) r <| by
simp only [RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, g]
rw [isUnit_iff_exists_inv]
use (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ <| X ())
rw [← map_mul, ← map_one (Ideal.Quotient.mk _), Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem]
exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton_self (C r * X () - 1)
private lemma auxHom_auxInv : (auxHom S r).toRingHom.comp (auxInv S r) = RingHom.id S := by
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (Submonoid.powers r)
ext x
simp [auxInv]
private lemma auxInv_auxHom : (auxInv S r).comp (auxHom (S := S) r).toRingHom = RingHom.id _ := by
rw [← RingHom.cancel_right (Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective)]
ext x
· simp [auxInv]
· simp only [auxInv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.coe_coe,
Function.comp_apply, auxHom_mk, aeval_X, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, invSelf, Away.lift,
lift_mk'_spec]
simp only [map_one, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← map_one (Ideal.Quotient.mk _), ← map_mul, Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem,
← Ideal.neg_mem_iff, neg_sub]
exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton_self (C r * X x - 1)
/-- The canonical algebra isomorphism from `MvPolynomial Unit R` quotiented by
`C r * X () - 1` to the localization of `R` away from `r`. -/
noncomputable def mvPolynomialQuotientEquiv :
((MvPolynomial Unit R) ⧸ Ideal.span { C r * X () - 1 }) ≃ₐ[R] S where
toFun := auxHom S r
invFun := auxInv S r
left_inv x := by
simpa using congrFun (congrArg DFunLike.coe <| auxInv_auxHom S r) x
right_inv s := by
simpa using congrFun (congrArg DFunLike.coe <| auxHom_auxInv S r) s
map_mul' := by simp
map_add' := by simp
commutes' := by simp
@[simp]
lemma mvPolynomialQuotientEquiv_apply (p : MvPolynomial Unit R) :
mvPolynomialQuotientEquiv S r (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ p) = aeval (S₁ := S) (fun _ ↦ invSelf r) p :=
rfl
|
end IsLocalization.Away
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Localization.lean | 125 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Fibration
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps.OpenQuotient
/-!
# Inseparable points in a topological space
In this file we prove basic properties of the following notions defined elsewhere.
* `Specializes` (notation: `x ⤳ y`) : a relation saying that `𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝 y`;
* `Inseparable`: a relation saying that two points in a topological space have the same
neighbourhoods; equivalently, they can't be separated by an open set;
* `InseparableSetoid X`: same relation, as a `Setoid`;
* `SeparationQuotient X`: the quotient of `X` by its `InseparableSetoid`.
We also prove various basic properties of the relation `Inseparable`.
## Notations
- `x ⤳ y`: notation for `Specializes x y`;
- `x ~ᵢ y` is used as a local notation for `Inseparable x y`;
- `𝓝 x` is the neighbourhoods filter `nhds x` of a point `x`, defined elsewhere.
## Tags
topological space, separation setoid
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology List
variable {X Y Z α ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[TopologicalSpace Z] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {x y z : X} {s : Set X} {f g : X → Y}
/-!
### `Specializes` relation
-/
/-- A collection of equivalent definitions of `x ⤳ y`. The public API is given by `iff` lemmas
below. -/
theorem specializes_TFAE (x y : X) :
TFAE [x ⤳ y,
pure x ≤ 𝓝 y,
∀ s : Set X , IsOpen s → y ∈ s → x ∈ s,
∀ s : Set X , IsClosed s → x ∈ s → y ∈ s,
y ∈ closure ({ x } : Set X),
closure ({ y } : Set X) ⊆ closure { x },
ClusterPt y (pure x)] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := (pure_le_nhds _).trans
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h s hso hy => h (hso.mem_nhds hy)
tfae_have 3 → 4 := fun h s hsc hx => of_not_not fun hy => h sᶜ hsc.isOpen_compl hy hx
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun h => h _ isClosed_closure (subset_closure <| mem_singleton _)
tfae_have 6 ↔ 5 := isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff.trans singleton_subset_iff
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7 := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_clusterPt, principal_singleton]
tfae_have 5 → 1 := by
refine fun h => (nhds_basis_opens _).ge_iff.2 ?_
rintro s ⟨hy, ho⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 h s ho hy with ⟨z, hxs, rfl : z = x⟩
exact ho.mem_nhds hxs
tfae_finish
theorem specializes_iff_nhds : x ⤳ y ↔ 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝 y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Specializes.not_disjoint (h : x ⤳ y) : ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := fun hd ↦
absurd (hd.mono_right h) <| by simp [NeBot.ne']
theorem specializes_iff_pure : x ⤳ y ↔ pure x ≤ 𝓝 y :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 1
alias ⟨Specializes.nhds_le_nhds, _⟩ := specializes_iff_nhds
alias ⟨Specializes.pure_le_nhds, _⟩ := specializes_iff_pure
theorem ker_nhds_eq_specializes : (𝓝 x).ker = {y | y ⤳ x} := by
ext; simp [specializes_iff_pure, le_def]
theorem specializes_iff_forall_open : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsOpen s → y ∈ s → x ∈ s :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 2
theorem Specializes.mem_open (h : x ⤳ y) (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
specializes_iff_forall_open.1 h s hs hy
theorem IsOpen.not_specializes (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : ¬x ⤳ y := fun h =>
hx <| h.mem_open hs hy
theorem specializes_iff_forall_closed : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → x ∈ s → y ∈ s :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 3
theorem Specializes.mem_closed (h : x ⤳ y) (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∈ s) : y ∈ s :=
specializes_iff_forall_closed.1 h s hs hx
theorem IsClosed.not_specializes (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∉ s) : ¬x ⤳ y := fun h =>
hy <| h.mem_closed hs hx
theorem specializes_iff_mem_closure : x ⤳ y ↔ y ∈ closure ({x} : Set X) :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 4
alias ⟨Specializes.mem_closure, _⟩ := specializes_iff_mem_closure
theorem specializes_iff_closure_subset : x ⤳ y ↔ closure ({y} : Set X) ⊆ closure {x} :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 5
alias ⟨Specializes.closure_subset, _⟩ := specializes_iff_closure_subset
theorem specializes_iff_clusterPt : x ⤳ y ↔ ClusterPt y (pure x) :=
(specializes_TFAE x y).out 0 6
theorem Filter.HasBasis.specializes_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : (𝓝 y).HasBasis p s) : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ i, p i → x ∈ s i :=
specializes_iff_pure.trans h.ge_iff
theorem specializes_rfl : x ⤳ x := le_rfl
@[refl]
theorem specializes_refl (x : X) : x ⤳ x :=
specializes_rfl
@[trans]
theorem Specializes.trans : x ⤳ y → y ⤳ z → x ⤳ z :=
le_trans
theorem specializes_of_eq (e : x = y) : x ⤳ y :=
e ▸ specializes_refl x
alias Specializes.of_eq := specializes_of_eq
theorem specializes_of_nhdsWithin (h₁ : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[s] y) (h₂ : x ∈ s) : x ⤳ y :=
specializes_iff_pure.2 <|
calc
pure x ≤ 𝓝[s] x := le_inf (pure_le_nhds _) (le_principal_iff.2 h₂)
_ ≤ 𝓝[s] y := h₁
_ ≤ 𝓝 y := inf_le_left
theorem Specializes.map_of_continuousAt (h : x ⤳ y) (hy : ContinuousAt f y) : f x ⤳ f y :=
specializes_iff_pure.2 fun _s hs =>
mem_pure.2 <| mem_preimage.1 <| mem_of_mem_nhds <| hy.mono_left h hs
theorem Specializes.map (h : x ⤳ y) (hf : Continuous f) : f x ⤳ f y :=
h.map_of_continuousAt hf.continuousAt
theorem Topology.IsInducing.specializes_iff (hf : IsInducing f) : f x ⤳ f y ↔ x ⤳ y := by
simp only [specializes_iff_mem_closure, hf.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, image_singleton,
mem_preimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.specializes_iff := IsInducing.specializes_iff
theorem subtype_specializes_iff {p : X → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : x ⤳ y ↔ (x : X) ⤳ y :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.specializes_iff.symm
@[simp]
theorem specializes_prod {x₁ x₂ : X} {y₁ y₂ : Y} : (x₁, y₁) ⤳ (x₂, y₂) ↔ x₁ ⤳ x₂ ∧ y₁ ⤳ y₂ := by
simp only [Specializes, nhds_prod_eq, prod_le_prod]
theorem Specializes.prod {x₁ x₂ : X} {y₁ y₂ : Y} (hx : x₁ ⤳ x₂) (hy : y₁ ⤳ y₂) :
(x₁, y₁) ⤳ (x₂, y₂) :=
specializes_prod.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem Specializes.fst {a b : X × Y} (h : a ⤳ b) : a.1 ⤳ b.1 := (specializes_prod.1 h).1
theorem Specializes.snd {a b : X × Y} (h : a ⤳ b) : a.2 ⤳ b.2 := (specializes_prod.1 h).2
@[simp]
theorem specializes_pi {f g : ∀ i, π i} : f ⤳ g ↔ ∀ i, f i ⤳ g i := by
simp only [Specializes, nhds_pi, pi_le_pi]
theorem not_specializes_iff_exists_open : ¬x ⤳ y ↔ ∃ S : Set X, IsOpen S ∧ y ∈ S ∧ x ∉ S := by
rw [specializes_iff_forall_open]
push_neg
rfl
theorem not_specializes_iff_exists_closed : ¬x ⤳ y ↔ ∃ S : Set X, IsClosed S ∧ x ∈ S ∧ y ∉ S := by
rw [specializes_iff_forall_closed]
push_neg
rfl
theorem IsOpen.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : IsOpen s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (hspec : ∀ x, f x ⤳ g x) :
Continuous (s.piecewise f g) := by
have : ∀ U, IsOpen U → g ⁻¹' U ⊆ f ⁻¹' U := fun U hU x hx ↦ (hspec x).mem_open hU hx
rw [continuous_def]
intro U hU
rw [piecewise_preimage, ite_eq_of_subset_right _ (this U hU)]
exact hU.preimage hf |>.inter hs |>.union (hU.preimage hg)
theorem IsClosed.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (hspec : ∀ x, g x ⤳ f x) :
Continuous (s.piecewise f g) := by
simpa only [piecewise_compl] using hs.isOpen_compl.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes hg hf hspec
attribute [local instance] specializationPreorder
/-- A continuous function is monotone with respect to the specialization preorders on the domain and
the codomain. -/
theorem Continuous.specialization_monotone (hf : Continuous f) : Monotone f :=
fun _ _ h => h.map hf
lemma closure_singleton_eq_Iic (x : X) : closure {x} = Iic x :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ specializes_iff_mem_closure.symm
/-- A subset `S` of a topological space is stable under specialization
if `x ∈ S → y ∈ S` for all `x ⤳ y`. -/
def StableUnderSpecialization (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ⤳ y → x ∈ s → y ∈ s
/-- A subset `S` of a topological space is stable under specialization
if `x ∈ S → y ∈ S` for all `y ⤳ x`. -/
def StableUnderGeneralization (s : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄, y ⤳ x → x ∈ s → y ∈ s
example {s : Set X} : StableUnderSpecialization s ↔ IsLowerSet s := Iff.rfl
example {s : Set X} : StableUnderGeneralization s ↔ IsUpperSet s := Iff.rfl
lemma IsClosed.stableUnderSpecialization {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
StableUnderSpecialization s :=
fun _ _ e ↦ e.mem_closed hs
lemma IsOpen.stableUnderGeneralization {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
StableUnderGeneralization s :=
fun _ _ e ↦ e.mem_open hs
@[simp]
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_compl_iff {s : Set X} :
StableUnderSpecialization sᶜ ↔ StableUnderGeneralization s :=
isLowerSet_compl
@[simp]
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_compl_iff {s : Set X} :
StableUnderGeneralization sᶜ ↔ StableUnderSpecialization s :=
isUpperSet_compl
alias ⟨_, StableUnderGeneralization.compl⟩ := stableUnderSpecialization_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, StableUnderSpecialization.compl⟩ := stableUnderGeneralization_compl_iff
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_univ : StableUnderSpecialization (univ : Set X) := isLowerSet_univ
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_empty : StableUnderSpecialization (∅ : Set X) := isLowerSet_empty
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_univ : StableUnderGeneralization (univ : Set X) := isUpperSet_univ
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_empty : StableUnderGeneralization (∅ : Set X) := isUpperSet_empty
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_sUnion (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderSpecialization s) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋃₀ S) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion H
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_sInter (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderSpecialization s) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋂₀ S) :=
isLowerSet_sInter H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_sUnion (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderGeneralization s) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋃₀ S) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_sInter (S : Set (Set X))
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, StableUnderGeneralization s) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋂₀ S) :=
isUpperSet_sInter H
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderSpecialization (S i)) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋃ i, S i) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion H
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iInter {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderSpecialization (S i)) : StableUnderSpecialization (⋂ i, S i) :=
isLowerSet_iInter H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderGeneralization (S i)) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋃ i, S i) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion H
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_iInter {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → Set X)
(H : ∀ i, StableUnderGeneralization (S i)) : StableUnderGeneralization (⋂ i, S i) :=
isUpperSet_iInter H
lemma Union_closure_singleton_eq_iff {s : Set X} :
(⋃ x ∈ s, closure {x}) = s ↔ StableUnderSpecialization s :=
show _ ↔ IsLowerSet s by simp only [closure_singleton_eq_Iic, ← lowerClosure_eq, coe_lowerClosure]
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iff_Union_eq {s : Set X} :
StableUnderSpecialization s ↔ (⋃ x ∈ s, closure {x}) = s :=
Union_closure_singleton_eq_iff.symm
alias ⟨StableUnderSpecialization.Union_eq, _⟩ := stableUnderSpecialization_iff_Union_eq
/-- A set is stable under specialization iff it is a union of closed sets. -/
lemma stableUnderSpecialization_iff_exists_sUnion_eq {s : Set X} :
StableUnderSpecialization s ↔ ∃ (S : Set (Set X)), (∀ s ∈ S, IsClosed s) ∧ ⋃₀ S = s := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨(fun x : X ↦ closure {x}) '' s, ?_, ?_⟩, fun ⟨S, hS, e⟩ ↦ e ▸
stableUnderSpecialization_sUnion S (fun x hx ↦ (hS x hx).stableUnderSpecialization)⟩
· rintro _ ⟨_, _, rfl⟩; exact isClosed_closure
· conv_rhs => rw [← H.Union_eq]
simp
/-- A set is stable under generalization iff it is an intersection of open sets. -/
lemma stableUnderGeneralization_iff_exists_sInter_eq {s : Set X} :
StableUnderGeneralization s ↔ ∃ (S : Set (Set X)), (∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) ∧ ⋂₀ S = s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨S, hS, e⟩ ↦ e ▸
stableUnderGeneralization_sInter S (fun x hx ↦ (hS x hx).stableUnderGeneralization)⟩
rw [← stableUnderSpecialization_compl_iff, stableUnderSpecialization_iff_exists_sUnion_eq]
exact fun ⟨S, h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨(·ᶜ) '' S, fun s ⟨t, ht, e⟩ ↦ e ▸ (h₁ t ht).isOpen_compl,
compl_injective ((sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl S).symm.trans h₂)⟩
lemma StableUnderSpecialization.preimage {s : Set Y}
(hs : StableUnderSpecialization s) (hf : Continuous f) :
StableUnderSpecialization (f ⁻¹' s) :=
IsLowerSet.preimage hs hf.specialization_monotone
lemma StableUnderGeneralization.preimage {s : Set Y}
(hs : StableUnderGeneralization s) (hf : Continuous f) :
StableUnderGeneralization (f ⁻¹' s) :=
IsUpperSet.preimage hs hf.specialization_monotone
/-- A map `f` between topological spaces is specializing if specializations lifts along `f`,
i.e. for each `f x' ⤳ y` there is some `x` with `x' ⤳ x` whose image is `y`. -/
def SpecializingMap (f : X → Y) : Prop :=
Relation.Fibration (flip (· ⤳ ·)) (flip (· ⤳ ·)) f
/-- A map `f` between topological spaces is generalizing if generalizations lifts along `f`,
i.e. for each `y ⤳ f x'` there is some `x ⤳ x'` whose image is `y`. -/
def GeneralizingMap (f : X → Y) : Prop :=
Relation.Fibration (· ⤳ ·) (· ⤳ ·) f
lemma specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton_subset :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, closure {f x} ⊆ f '' closure {x} := by
simp only [SpecializingMap, Relation.Fibration, flip, specializes_iff_mem_closure]; rfl
alias ⟨SpecializingMap.closure_singleton_subset, _⟩ := specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton_subset
lemma SpecializingMap.stableUnderSpecialization_image (hf : SpecializingMap f)
{s : Set X} (hs : StableUnderSpecialization s) : StableUnderSpecialization (f '' s) :=
IsLowerSet.image_fibration hf hs
alias StableUnderSpecialization.image := SpecializingMap.stableUnderSpecialization_image
lemma specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image_singleton :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, StableUnderSpecialization (f '' closure {x}) := by
simpa only [closure_singleton_eq_Iic] using Relation.fibration_iff_isLowerSet_image_Iic
lemma specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ s, StableUnderSpecialization s → StableUnderSpecialization (f '' s) :=
Relation.fibration_iff_isLowerSet_image
lemma specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton (hf : Continuous f) :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, f '' closure {x} = closure {f x} := by
simpa only [closure_singleton_eq_Iic] using
Relation.fibration_iff_image_Iic hf.specialization_monotone
lemma specializingMap_iff_isClosed_image_closure_singleton (hf : Continuous f) :
SpecializingMap f ↔ ∀ x, IsClosed (f '' closure {x}) := by
refine ⟨fun h x ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image_singleton.mpr
(fun x ↦ (h x).stableUnderSpecialization)⟩
rw [(specializingMap_iff_closure_singleton hf).mp h x]
exact isClosed_closure
lemma SpecializingMap.comp {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
(hf : SpecializingMap f) (hg : SpecializingMap g) :
SpecializingMap (g ∘ f) := by
simp only [specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image, Set.image_comp] at *
exact fun s h ↦ hg _ (hf _ h)
lemma IsClosedMap.specializingMap (hf : IsClosedMap f) : SpecializingMap f :=
specializingMap_iff_stableUnderSpecialization_image_singleton.mpr <|
fun _ ↦ (hf _ isClosed_closure).stableUnderSpecialization
lemma Topology.IsInducing.specializingMap (hf : IsInducing f)
(h : StableUnderSpecialization (range f)) : SpecializingMap f := by
intros x y e
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := h e ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.specializes_iff.mp e, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.specializingMap := IsInducing.specializingMap
lemma Topology.IsInducing.generalizingMap (hf : IsInducing f)
(h : StableUnderGeneralization (range f)) : GeneralizingMap f := by
intros x y e
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := h e ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.specializes_iff.mp e, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.generalizingMap := IsInducing.generalizingMap
lemma IsOpenEmbedding.generalizingMap (hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : GeneralizingMap f :=
hf.isInducing.generalizingMap hf.isOpen_range.stableUnderGeneralization
lemma SpecializingMap.stableUnderSpecialization_range (h : SpecializingMap f) :
StableUnderSpecialization (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ stableUnderSpecialization_univ.image h
lemma GeneralizingMap.stableUnderGeneralization_image (hf : GeneralizingMap f) {s : Set X}
(hs : StableUnderGeneralization s) : StableUnderGeneralization (f '' s) :=
IsUpperSet.image_fibration hf hs
lemma GeneralizingMap_iff_stableUnderGeneralization_image :
GeneralizingMap f ↔ ∀ s, StableUnderGeneralization s → StableUnderGeneralization (f '' s) :=
Relation.fibration_iff_isUpperSet_image
alias StableUnderGeneralization.image := GeneralizingMap.stableUnderGeneralization_image
lemma GeneralizingMap.stableUnderGeneralization_range (h : GeneralizingMap f) :
StableUnderGeneralization (range f) :=
@image_univ _ _ f ▸ stableUnderGeneralization_univ.image h
lemma GeneralizingMap.comp {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
(hf : GeneralizingMap f) (hg : GeneralizingMap g) :
GeneralizingMap (g ∘ f) := by
simp only [GeneralizingMap_iff_stableUnderGeneralization_image, Set.image_comp] at *
exact fun s h ↦ hg _ (hf _ h)
/-!
### `Inseparable` relation
-/
local infixl:0 " ~ᵢ " => Inseparable
theorem inseparable_def : (x ~ᵢ y) ↔ 𝓝 x = 𝓝 y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inseparable_iff_specializes_and : (x ~ᵢ y) ↔ x ⤳ y ∧ y ⤳ x :=
le_antisymm_iff
| theorem Inseparable.specializes (h : x ~ᵢ y) : x ⤳ y := h.le
theorem Inseparable.specializes' (h : x ~ᵢ y) : y ⤳ x := h.ge
| Mathlib/Topology/Inseparable.lean | 427 | 430 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sam van Gool. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sam van Gool
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PrimeIdeal
import Mathlib.Order.Zorn
/-!
# Separating prime filters and ideals
In a bounded distributive lattice, if $F$ is a filter, $I$ is an ideal, and $F$ and $I$ are
disjoint, then there exists a prime ideal $J$ containing $I$ with $J$ still disjoint from $F$.
This theorem is a crucial ingredient to [Stone's][Sto1938] duality for bounded distributive
lattices. The construction of the separator relies on Zorn's lemma.
## Tags
ideal, filter, prime, distributive lattice
## References
* [M. H. Stone, Topological representations of distributive lattices and Brouwerian logics
(1938)][Sto1938]
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type*}
open Order Ideal Set
variable [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α]
variable {F : PFilter α} {I : Ideal α}
namespace DistribLattice
lemma mem_ideal_sup_principal (a b : α) (J : Ideal α) : b ∈ J ⊔ principal a ↔ ∃ j ∈ J, b ≤ j ⊔ a :=
⟨fun ⟨j, ⟨jJ, _, ha', bja'⟩⟩ => ⟨j, jJ, le_trans bja' (sup_le_sup_left ha' j)⟩,
fun ⟨j, hj, hbja⟩ => ⟨j, hj, a, le_refl a, hbja⟩⟩
theorem prime_ideal_of_disjoint_filter_ideal (hFI : Disjoint (F : Set α) (I : Set α)) :
| ∃ J : Ideal α, (IsPrime J) ∧ I ≤ J ∧ Disjoint (F : Set α) J := by
-- Let S be the set of ideals containing I and disjoint from F.
set S : Set (Set α) := { J : Set α | IsIdeal J ∧ I ≤ J ∧ Disjoint (F : Set α) J }
-- Then I is in S...
have IinS : ↑I ∈ S := by
refine ⟨Order.Ideal.isIdeal I, by trivial⟩
-- ...and S contains upper bounds for any non-empty chains.
have chainub : ∀ c ⊆ S, IsChain (· ⊆ ·) c → c.Nonempty → ∃ ub ∈ S, ∀ s ∈ c, s ⊆ ub := by
intros c hcS hcC hcNe
use sUnion c
refine ⟨?_, fun s hs ↦ le_sSup hs⟩
simp only [le_eq_subset, mem_setOf_eq, disjoint_sUnion_right, S]
let ⟨J, hJ⟩ := hcNe
refine ⟨Order.isIdeal_sUnion_of_isChain (fun _ hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).1) hcC hcNe,
⟨le_trans (hcS hJ).2.1 (le_sSup hJ), fun J hJ ↦ (hcS hJ).2.2⟩⟩
-- Thus, by Zorn's lemma, we can pick a maximal ideal J in S.
obtain ⟨Jset, _, hmax⟩ := zorn_subset_nonempty S chainub I IinS
obtain ⟨Jidl, IJ, JF⟩ := hmax.prop
set J := IsIdeal.toIdeal Jidl
use J
have IJ' : I ≤ J := IJ
clear chainub IinS
-- By construction, J contains I and is disjoint from F. It remains to prove that J is prime.
refine ⟨?_, ⟨IJ, JF⟩⟩
-- First note that J is proper: ⊤ ∈ F so ⊤ ∉ J because F and J are disjoint.
have Jpr : IsProper J := isProper_of_not_mem (Set.disjoint_left.1 JF F.top_mem)
-- Suppose that a₁ ∉ J, a₂ ∉ J. We need to prove that a₁ ⊔ a₂ ∉ J.
rw [isPrime_iff_mem_or_mem]
intros a₁ a₂
contrapose!
intro ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩
-- Consider the ideals J₁, J₂ generated by J ∪ {a₁} and J ∪ {a₂}, respectively.
let J₁ := J ⊔ principal a₁
let J₂ := J ⊔ principal a₂
-- For each i, Jᵢ is an ideal that contains aᵢ, and is not equal to J.
have a₁J₁ : a₁ ∈ J₁ := mem_of_subset_of_mem (le_sup_right : _ ≤ J ⊔ _) mem_principal_self
have a₂J₂ : a₂ ∈ J₂ := mem_of_subset_of_mem (le_sup_right : _ ≤ J ⊔ _) mem_principal_self
have J₁J : ↑J₁ ≠ Jset := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' a₁J₁ ha₁
have J₂J : ↑J₂ ≠ Jset := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' a₂J₂ ha₂
-- Therefore, since J is maximal, we must have Jᵢ ∉ S.
have J₁S : ↑J₁ ∉ S := fun h => J₁J (hmax.eq_of_le h (le_sup_left : J ≤ J₁)).symm
have J₂S : ↑J₂ ∉ S := fun h => J₂J (hmax.eq_of_le h (le_sup_left : J ≤ J₂)).symm
-- Since Jᵢ is an ideal that contains I, we have that Jᵢ is not disjoint from F.
have J₁F : ¬ (Disjoint (F : Set α) J₁) := by
intro hdis
apply J₁S
simp only [le_eq_subset, mem_setOf_eq, SetLike.coe_subset_coe, S]
exact ⟨J₁.isIdeal, le_trans IJ' le_sup_left, hdis⟩
have J₂F : ¬ (Disjoint (F : Set α) J₂) := by
intro hdis
apply J₂S
simp only [le_eq_subset, mem_setOf_eq, SetLike.coe_subset_coe, S]
exact ⟨J₂.isIdeal, le_trans IJ' le_sup_left, hdis⟩
-- Thus, pick cᵢ ∈ F ∩ Jᵢ.
let ⟨c₁, ⟨c₁F, c₁J₁⟩⟩ := Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 J₁F
let ⟨c₂, ⟨c₂F, c₂J₂⟩⟩ := Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 J₂F
-- Using the definition of Jᵢ, we can pick bᵢ ∈ J such that cᵢ ≤ bᵢ ⊔ aᵢ.
let ⟨b₁, ⟨b₁J, cba₁⟩⟩ := (mem_ideal_sup_principal a₁ c₁ J).1 c₁J₁
let ⟨b₂, ⟨b₂J, cba₂⟩⟩ := (mem_ideal_sup_principal a₂ c₂ J).1 c₂J₂
-- Since J is an ideal, we have b := b₁ ⊔ b₂ ∈ J.
let b := b₁ ⊔ b₂
have bJ : b ∈ J := sup_mem b₁J b₂J
-- We now prove a key inequality, using crucially that the lattice is distributive.
have ineq : c₁ ⊓ c₂ ≤ b ⊔ (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
calc
c₁ ⊓ c₂ ≤ (b₁ ⊔ a₁) ⊓ (b₂ ⊔ a₂) := inf_le_inf cba₁ cba₂
_ ≤ (b ⊔ a₁) ⊓ (b ⊔ a₂) := by
apply inf_le_inf <;> apply sup_le_sup_right; exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right
_ = b ⊔ (a₁ ⊓ a₂) := (sup_inf_left b a₁ a₂).symm
-- Note that c₁ ⊓ c₂ ∈ F, since c₁ and c₂ are both in F and F is a filter.
-- Since F is an upper set, it now follows that b ⊔ (a₁ ⊓ a₂) ∈ F.
have ba₁a₂F : b ⊔ (a₁ ⊓ a₂) ∈ F := PFilter.mem_of_le ineq (PFilter.inf_mem c₁F c₂F)
-- Now, if we would have a₁ ⊓ a₂ ∈ J, then, since J is an ideal and b ∈ J, we would also get
-- b ⊔ (a₁ ⊓ a₂) ∈ J. But this contradicts that J is disjoint from F.
contrapose! JF with ha₁a₂
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff]
use b ⊔ (a₁ ⊓ a₂)
exact ⟨ba₁a₂F, sup_mem bJ ha₁a₂⟩
| Mathlib/Order/PrimeSeparator.lean | 46 | 143 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
| theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 252 | 254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.StructurePolynomial
/-!
# Witt vectors
In this file we define the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors and ring operations on it.
The ring axioms are verified in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean`.
For a fixed commutative ring `R` and prime `p`,
a Witt vector `x : 𝕎 R` is an infinite sequence `ℕ → R` of elements of `R`.
However, the ring operations `+` and `*` are not defined in the obvious component-wise way.
Instead, these operations are defined via certain polynomials
using the machinery in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean`.
The `n`th value of the sum of two Witt vectors can depend on the `0`-th through `n`th values
of the summands. This effectively simulates a “carrying” operation.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector p R`: the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors with coefficients in `R`.
* `WittVector.coeff x n`: projects the `n`th value of the Witt vector `x`.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `WittVector p R` is the ring of `p`-typical Witt vectors over the commutative ring `R`,
where `p` is a prime number.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, this ring is isomorphic to `ℕ → R` (the product of `ℕ` copies of `R`).
If `R` is a ring of characteristic `p`, then `WittVector p R` is a ring of characteristic `0`.
The canonical example is `WittVector p (ZMod p)`,
which is isomorphic to the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]`. -/
structure WittVector (p : ℕ) (R : Type*) where mk' ::
/-- `x.coeff n` is the `n`th coefficient of the Witt vector `x`.
This concept does not have a standard name in the literature.
-/
coeff : ℕ → R
-- Porting note: added to make the `p` argument explicit
/-- Construct a Witt vector `mk p x : 𝕎 R` from a sequence `x` of elements of `R`. -/
def WittVector.mk (p : ℕ) {R : Type*} (coeff : ℕ → R) : WittVector p R := mk' coeff
variable {p : ℕ}
/- We cannot make this `localized` notation, because the `p` on the RHS doesn't occur on the left
Hiding the `p` in the notation is very convenient, so we opt for repeating the `local notation`
in other files that use Witt vectors. -/
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
namespace WittVector
variable {R : Type*}
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : 𝕎 R} (h : ∀ n, x.coeff n = y.coeff n) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
simp only at h
simp [funext_iff, h]
variable (p)
theorem coeff_mk (x : ℕ → R) : (mk p x).coeff = x :=
rfl
/- These instances are not needed for the rest of the development,
but it is interesting to establish early on that `WittVector p` is a lawful functor. -/
instance : Functor (WittVector p) where
map f v := mk p (f ∘ v.coeff)
mapConst a _ := mk p fun _ => a
instance : LawfulFunctor (WittVector p) where
map_const := rfl
-- Porting note: no longer needs to deconstruct `v` to conclude `{coeff := v.coeff} = v`
id_map _ := rfl
comp_map _ _ _ := rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
open MvPolynomial
section RingOperations
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `0` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZero : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 0
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `1` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittOne : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 1
/-- The polynomials used for defining the addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittAdd : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 + X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNSMul (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZSMul (n : ℤ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
/-- The polynomials used for describing the subtraction of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittSub : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 - X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining the multiplication of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittMul : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 * X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining the negation of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNeg : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (-X 0)
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittPow (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 ^ n)
variable {p}
/-- An auxiliary definition used in `WittVector.eval`.
Evaluates a polynomial whose variables come from the disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`,
with a curried evaluation `x`.
This can be defined more generally but we use only a specific instance here. -/
def peval {k : ℕ} (φ : MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → ℕ → R) : R :=
aeval (Function.uncurry x) φ
/-- Let `φ` be a family of polynomials, indexed by natural numbers, whose variables come from the
disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`, and let `xᵢ` be a Witt vector for `0 ≤ i < k`.
`eval φ x` evaluates `φ` mapping the variable `X_(i, n)` to the `n`th coefficient of `xᵢ`.
Instantiating `φ` with certain polynomials defined in
`Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean` establishes the
ring operations on `𝕎 R`. For example, `WittVector.wittAdd` is such a `φ` with `k = 2`;
evaluating this at `(x₀, x₁)` gives us the sum of two Witt vectors `x₀ + x₁`.
-/
def eval {k : ℕ} (φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => peval (φ n) fun i => (x i).coeff
instance : Zero (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittZero p) ![]⟩
instance : Inhabited (𝕎 R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittOne p) ![]⟩
instance : Add (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittAdd p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Sub (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittSub p) ![x, y]⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittNSMul p n) ![x]⟩
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittZSMul p n) ![x]⟩
instance : Mul (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittMul p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Neg (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x => eval (wittNeg p) ![x]⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (𝕎 R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x n => eval (wittPow p n) ![x]⟩
instance : NatCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Nat.unaryCast⟩
instance : IntCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Int.castDef⟩
end RingOperations
section WittStructureSimplifications
@[simp]
theorem wittZero_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : wittZero p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittZero, wittStructureRat, bind₁, aeval_zero', constantCoeff_xInTermsOfW, map_zero,
map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_zero_eq_one : wittOne p 0 = 1 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_one, bind₁_X_right,
map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_pos_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : wittOne p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, RingHom.map_zero, map_one, RingHom.map_one,
map_wittStructureInt]
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on with | h n IH => ?_
rw [xInTermsOfW_eq]
simp only [map_mul, map_sub, map_sum, map_pow, bind₁_X_right,
bind₁_C_right]
rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [invOf_eq_inv, one_mul, inv_pow, tsub_zero, RingHom.map_one, pow_zero]
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, xInTermsOfW_zero, sub_self, bind₁_X_right]
· intro i hin hi0
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hin
rw [IH _ hin (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi0), zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1.ne_zero), mul_zero]
· rw [Finset.mem_range]; intro; contradiction
@[simp]
theorem wittAdd_zero : wittAdd p 0 = X (0, 0) + X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittAdd, wittStructureRat, map_add, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X,
wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittSub_zero : wittSub p 0 = X (0, 0) - X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittSub, wittStructureRat, map_sub, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X,
wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittMul_zero : wittMul p 0 = X (0, 0) * X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittMul, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
map_mul, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittNeg_zero : wittNeg p 0 = -X (0, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittNeg, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
map_neg, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittAdd (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittAdd p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [add_zero, RingHom.map_add, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittSub (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittSub p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [sub_zero, RingHom.map_sub, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittMul (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittMul p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [mul_zero, RingHom.map_mul, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittNeg (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittNeg p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [neg_zero, RingHom.map_neg, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittNSMul (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittNSMul p m n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [smul_zero, map_nsmul, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittZSMul (z : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittZSMul p z n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [smul_zero, map_zsmul, constantCoeff_X]
end WittStructureSimplifications
section Coeff
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem zero_coeff (n : ℕ) : (0 : 𝕎 R).coeff n = 0 :=
show (aeval _ (wittZero p n) : R) = 0 by simp only [wittZero_eq_zero, map_zero]
|
@[simp]
theorem one_coeff_zero : (1 : 𝕎 R).coeff 0 = 1 :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Defs.lean | 292 | 294 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne (by simp) _
theorem contDiffWithinAt_singleton : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f {x} x :=
(contDiffWithinAt_const (c := f x)).congr (by simp) rfl
end constants
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
section linear
/-- Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd hf.toContinuousLinearMap univ).contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
/-- The identity is `C^n`. -/
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
/-- Bilinear functions are `C^n`. -/
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b :=
(hb.toContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd_bilinear _).contDiff
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g, fun i ↦ ?_⟩
change AnalyticOn 𝕜
(fun x ↦ (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin i ↦ E) F G g) (p x i)) u
apply AnalyticOnNhd.comp_analyticOn _ (h'p i) (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.analyticOnNhd _ _
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
rcases hf.contDiffOn' hi (by simp) with ⟨U, hU, hxU, hfU⟩
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open hU hxU, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_inter_open (f := f) hU hxU]
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hfU
exact .symm <| (hfU.ftaylorSeriesWithin (hs.inter hU)).continuousLinearMap_comp g
|>.eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl (hs.inter hU) ⟨hx, hxU⟩
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the left is
obtained by applying the linear map to the iterated derivative. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the left is
obtained by applying the linear equiv to the iterated derivative. This is true without
differentiability assumptions. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffWithinAt uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
/-- Composition with a linear isometry equiv on the left preserves the norm of the iterated
derivative. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [Function.comp_def, e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability at a
point. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
match n with
| ω =>
obtain ⟨u, hu, p, hp, h'p⟩ := hf
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g, ?_⟩
· refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
· intro i
change AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun x ↦
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapL (fun _ ↦ g) (p (g x) i)) (⇑g ⁻¹' u)
apply AnalyticOn.comp _ _ (Set.mapsTo_univ _ _)
· exact ContinuousLinearEquiv.analyticOn _ _
· exact (h'p i).comp (g.analyticOn _) (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
| (n : ℕ∞) =>
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g⟩
refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx => (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuousLinearMap g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions. -/
theorem ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) _
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right {f : E → F} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h's : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s)) {x : G}
(hx : g x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
((((hf.of_le hi).ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).compContinuousLinearMap
g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn le_rfl h's hx).symm
/-- The iterated derivative within a set of the composition with a linear equiv on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear equiv. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃L[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1
simp only [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
· ext1 m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s)) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
fderivWithin 𝕜
(ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft _ (fun _x : Fin i => g) ∘
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s ∘ g)) (g ⁻¹' s) x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
rw [this, ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.continuousMultilinearMapCongrLeft_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx),
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', coe_coe, comp_apply, tail_def, tail_def]
/-- The iterated derivative of the composition with a linear map on the right is
obtained by composing the iterated derivative with the linear map. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G →L[𝕜] E) {f : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : G) {i : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x =
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ _) hi
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)‖ := by
| have : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f hs hx i
rw [this, ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_compContinuous_linearIsometryEquiv]
/-- Composition with a linear isometry on the right preserves the norm of the iterated derivative
within a set. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F) (x : G)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ (g x)) i
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
constructor
· intro H
simpa [← preimage_comp, Function.comp_def] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G)
· intro H
rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x, ← e.coe_coe] at H
exact H.comp_continuousLinearMap _
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 425 | 446 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
/-!
# Further lemmas about the integers
The distinction between this file and `Data.Int.Order.Basic` is not particularly clear.
They are separated by now to minimize the porting requirements for tactics during the transition to
mathlib4. Please feel free to reorganize these two files.
-/
open Function Nat
namespace Int
/-! ### nat abs -/
theorem natAbs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs = b.natAbs ↔ a * a = b * b := by
rw [← abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq, abs_eq_natAbs, abs_eq_natAbs]
exact Int.natCast_inj.symm
theorem natAbs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs < b.natAbs ↔ a * a < b * b := by
rw [← abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt, abs_eq_natAbs, abs_eq_natAbs]
exact Int.ofNat_lt.symm
theorem natAbs_le_iff_mul_self_le {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs ≤ b.natAbs ↔ a * a ≤ b * b := by
rw [← abs_le_iff_mul_self_le, abs_eq_natAbs, abs_eq_natAbs]
exact Int.ofNat_le.symm
end Int
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Order/Lemmas.lean | 40 | 42 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
@[simp]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
@[simp]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (le_iSup u))
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (iInf_le u))
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simpa only [limsSup, eventually_principal] using sInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup s
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_sInf (s : Set α) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s := by
simpa only [limsInf, eventually_principal] using sSup_lowerBounds_eq_sInf s
@[simp] lemma limsup_top_eq_iSup (u : β → α) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_sSup, sSup_range]
@[simp] lemma liminf_top_eq_iInf (u : β → α) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_sInf, sInf_range]
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
(CompleteLatticeHom.dual f).apply_limsup_iterate _
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup (e ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply, e.image_eq_preimage,
Set.preimage_setOf_eq, e.le_symm_apply]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
e.dual.apply_blimsup
theorem _root_.sSupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
theorem _root_.sInfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
(sInfHom.dual g).apply_blimsup_le
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
theorem liminf_sdiff [NeBot f] (a : α) : liminf u f \ a = liminf (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [sdiff_eq, inf_comm _ aᶜ, inf_liminf]
theorem sdiff_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a \ limsup u f = liminf (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, liminf_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_limsup]
theorem sdiff_liminf (a : α) : a \ liminf u f = limsup (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, limsup_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_liminf]
end CompleteBooleanAlgebra
section SetLattice
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {𝓕 : Filter ι} {a : α}
lemma mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem : (a ∈ liminf s 𝓕) ↔ (∀ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simpa only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter]
using ⟨fun ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩ ↦ mem_of_superset hS (by tauto), fun h ↦ ⟨{i | a ∈ s i}, h, by tauto⟩⟩
lemma mem_limsup_iff_frequently_mem : (a ∈ limsup s 𝓕) ↔ (∃ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, iff_not_comm, ← mem_compl_iff, limsup_compl, comp_apply,
mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem]
theorem cofinite.blimsup_set_eq :
blimsup s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, le_eq_subset, eventually_cofinite, not_forall, sInf_eq_sInter, exists_prop]
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hx t h => ?_⟩ <;> contrapose! h
· simp only [mem_sInter, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
exact ⟨{x}ᶜ, by simpa using h, by simp⟩
· exact hx.mono fun i hi => ⟨hi.1, fun hit => h (hit hi.2)⟩
theorem cofinite.bliminf_set_eq : bliminf s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, ← blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup,
cofinite.blimsup_set_eq]
rfl
/-- In other words, `limsup cofinite s` is the set of elements lying inside the family `s`
infinitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.limsup_set_eq : limsup s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.blimsup_true s, cofinite.blimsup_set_eq, true_and]
/-- In other words, `liminf cofinite s` is the set of elements lying outside the family `s`
finitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.liminf_set_eq : liminf s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.bliminf_true s, cofinite.bliminf_set_eq, true_and]
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β} {q : ι → Prop}
(hl : l.HasBasis q b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) :
∃ f : { i | q i } → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
rw [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup] at hx
simp only [iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
choose g hg hg' using hx
refine ⟨fun i : { i | q i } => g (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2), fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact hg' (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
· exact hg (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup' {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β}
(hl : l.HasBasis (fun _ => True) b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) : ∃ f : ι → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup hl hx
exact ⟨fun i => f ⟨i, trivial⟩, fun i => hf ⟨i, trivial⟩⟩
end SetLattice
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : a < limsSup f) : ∃ᶠ n in f, a < n := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, not_lt] at h
exact limsSup_le_of_le hf h
theorem frequently_lt_of_limsInf_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : limsInf f < a) : ∃ᶠ n in f, n < a :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup (α := OrderDual α) hf h
theorem eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : b < liminf u f)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, b < u a := by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ : ∃ (c : β) (_ : c ∈ { c : β | ∀ᶠ n : α in f, c ≤ u n }), b < c := by
simp_rw [exists_prop]
exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup hu h
exact hc.mono fun x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hbc hx
theorem eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : limsup u f < b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, u a < b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (β := βᵒᵈ) h hu
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, eventually we have `u b < x + ε`. -/
theorem eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x)
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, u b < x + ε :=
eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hu (lt_add_of_pos_right x hε)) hu_bdd
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, eventually we have `x + ε < u b`. -/
theorem eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop)
(hε : ε < 0) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, x + ε < u b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_of_neg_right x hε) hu) hu_bdd
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that `u n < x + ε`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_limsup_le [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ n : PNat, u n < x + ε := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, u n < x + ε := eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that ` x + ε < u n`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_le_liminf [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop) (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ n : PNat, x + ε < u n := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + ε < u n := eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β}
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, b ≤ u x)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
b ≤ limsup u f := by
revert hu_le
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently]
simp_rw [← lt_iff_not_ge]
exact fun h => eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt h hu
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ b :=
le_limsup_of_frequently_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu_le hu
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : b < limsup u f) : ∃ᶠ x in f, b < u x := by
contrapose! h
apply limsSup_le_of_le hu
simpa using h
theorem frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : liminf u f < b) : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x < b :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) hu h
theorem limsup_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ a in f, u a < y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from above, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le'` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must eventually be smaller or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y > x, ∃ z, x < z ∧ z < y
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro y x_y
rcases h' y x_y with ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ ((h z x_z).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt))).trans_lt z_y
· apply limsup_le_of_le h₁
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, x_z, hz⟩
exact (h z x_z).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_left (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `limsup_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma limsup_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ (a : α) in f, u a ≤ y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro h y x_y
obtain ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩ := exists_between x_y
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ (h z x_z)).trans_lt z_y
theorem le_limsup_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y < u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from below, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must frequently be larger or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y < x, ∃ z, y < z ∧ z < x
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := h' y y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le ((h z z_x).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt)) h₂)
· apply le_limsup_of_frequently_le _ h₂
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, z_x, hz⟩
exact (h z z_x).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_right (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `le_limsup_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma le_limsup_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h)).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro h y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := exists_between y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le (h z z_x) h₂)
theorem le_liminf_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y < u a := limsup_le_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `le_liminf_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem le_liminf_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := limsup_le_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a < y := le_limsup_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `liminf_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem liminf_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ y := le_limsup_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
lemma liminf_le_limsup_of_frequently_le {v : α → β} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ v x)
(h₁ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup v f := by
rcases f.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· exact (frequently_bot h).rec
have h₃ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₂.eventually_le
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_le (a := a)
exact (h.and_eventually ha).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
have h₄ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁.eventually_ge
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_ge (a := a)
exact (ha.and_frequently h).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
refine (le_limsup_iff h₄ h₂).2 fun y y_v ↦ ?_
have := (le_liminf_iff h₃ h₁).1 (le_refl (liminf u f)) y y_v
exact (h.and_eventually this).mono fun x ⟨ux_vx, y_ux⟩ ↦ y_ux.trans_le ux_vx
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : Filter α} {b : α}
-- The linter erroneously claims that I'm not referring to `c`
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) (l : f.limsSup < b) :
∀ᶠ a in f, a < b :=
let ⟨c, (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, a ≤ c), hcb⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h l
mem_of_superset h fun _a => hcb.trans_le'
theorem gt_mem_sets_of_limsInf_gt : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) → b < f.limsInf → ∀ᶠ a in f, b < a :=
@lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` over `j : Subtype p` and a function `f`, then
`liminf_reparam j` is equal to `j` if `f` is bounded below on `s j`, and otherwise to some
index `k` such that `f` is bounded below on `s k` (if there exists one).
To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is chosen as the minimal suitable index.
This function is used to write down a liminf in a measurable way,
in `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf` and `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def liminf_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
let g : ℕ → Subtype p := (exists_surjective_nat _).choose
have Z : ∃ n, g n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
by_cases H : ∃ j, j ∈ m
· rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj⟩
· push_neg at H
exact ⟨0, Or.inr H⟩
if j ∈ m then j else g (Nat.find Z)
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
liminf f v = ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
classical
rcases H with ⟨j0, hj0⟩
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
have : ∀ (j : Subtype p), Nonempty (s j) := fun j ↦ Nonempty.coe_sort (hs j)
have A : ⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) =
⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
by_cases hj : j ∈ m
· have : j = liminf_reparam f s p j := by simp only [m, liminf_reparam, hj, ite_true]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
apply subset_iUnion _ j
· simp only [m, mem_setOf_eq, ← nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hj
simp only [hj, empty_subset]
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
exact subset_iUnion (fun (k : Subtype p) ↦ (⋂ (i : s k), Iic (f i))) (liminf_reparam f s p j)
have B : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) =
Iic (⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i) := by
intro j
apply (Iic_ciInf _).symm
change liminf_reparam f s p j ∈ m
by_cases Hj : j ∈ m
· simpa only [m, liminf_reparam, if_pos Hj] using Hj
· simp only [m, liminf_reparam, if_neg Hj]
have Z : ∃ n, (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j0 with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj0⟩
rcases Nat.find_spec Z with hZ|hZ
· exact hZ
· exact (hZ j0 hj0).elim
simp_rw [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, B, sSup_iUnion_Iic]
open Classical in
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
liminf f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sSup univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sSup ∅
else ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
by_cases H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅
· rw [if_pos H]
rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
simp [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty j j.2 hj]
rw [if_neg H]
by_cases H' : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))
· have A : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff]
exact H'
simp_rw [if_pos H', hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, iUnion_empty]
rw [if_neg H']
apply hv.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf
· push_neg at H
simpa only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] using H
· push_neg at H'
exact H'
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` and a function `f`, then `limsup_reparam j` is equal
to `j` if `f` is bounded above on `s j`, and otherwise to some index `k` such that `f` is bounded
above on `s k` (if there exists one). To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is
chosen as the minimal suitable index. This function is used to write down a limsup in a measurable
way, in `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup` and `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def limsup_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
liminf_reparam (α := αᵒᵈ) f s p j
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded above. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
limsup f v = ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf (α := αᵒᵈ) hv hs H
open Classical in
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
limsup f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sInf univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sInf ∅
else ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite (α := αᵒᵈ) hv f
end Classical
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
end Filter
section Order
theorem GaloisConnection.l_limsup_le [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {f : Filter α} {v : α → β} {l : β → γ} {u : γ → β}
(gc : GaloisConnection l u)
(hlv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => l (v x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
l (limsup v f) ≤ limsup (fun x => l (v x)) f := by
refine le_limsSup_of_le hlv fun c hc => ?_
rw [Filter.eventually_map] at hc
simp_rw [gc _ _] at hc ⊢
exact limsSup_le_of_le hv_co hc
theorem OrderIso.limsup_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (limsup u f) = limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f := by
refine le_antisymm ((OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g).l_limsup_le hgu hu_co) ?_
rw [← g.symm.symm_apply_apply <| limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f, g.symm_symm]
refine g.monotone ?_
have hf : u = fun i => g.symm (g (u i)) := funext fun i => (g.symm_apply_apply (u i)).symm
nth_rw 2 [hf]
refine (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g.symm).l_limsup_le ?_ hgu_co
simp_rw [g.symm_apply_apply]
exact hu
theorem OrderIso.liminf_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (liminf u f) = liminf (fun x => g (u x)) f :=
OrderIso.limsup_apply (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) g.dual hu hu_co hgu hgu_co
end Order
section MinMax
open Filter
theorem limsup_max [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f = max (limsup u f) (limsup v f) := by
have bddmax := IsBoundedUnder.sup h₃ h₄
have cobddmax := isCoboundedUnder_le_max (v := v) (Or.inl h₁)
apply le_antisymm
· refine (limsup_le_iff cobddmax bddmax).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
have hu := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hb) h₃
have hv := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right _ _) hb) h₄
refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hu hv) (fun _ ↦ by simp)
· exact max_le (c := limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_left (u a) (v a))) h₁ bddmax)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_right (u a) (v a))) h₂ bddmax)
theorem liminf_min [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ min (u a) (v a)) f = min (liminf u f) (liminf v f) :=
limsup_max (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
open Finset
theorem limsup_finset_sup' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup' s hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
have bddsup := isBoundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₂
| apply le_antisymm
· have h₃ : ∃ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by
rcases hs with ⟨i, i_s⟩
use i, i_s
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 1,149 | 1,152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
| theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 96 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Pointwise.Stabilizer
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-! # Blocks
Given `SMul G X`, an action of a type `G` on a type `X`, we define
- the predicate `MulAction.IsBlock G B` states that `B : Set X` is a block,
which means that the sets `g • B`, for `g ∈ G`, are equal or disjoint.
Under `Group G` and `MulAction G X`, this is equivalent to the classical
definition `MulAction.IsBlock.def_one`
- a bunch of lemmas that give examples of “trivial” blocks : ⊥, ⊤, singletons,
and non trivial blocks: orbit of the group, orbit of a normal subgroup…
The non-existence of nontrivial blocks is the definition of primitive actions.
## Results for actions on finite sets
- `MulAction.IsBlock.ncard_block_mul_ncard_orbit_eq` : The cardinality of a block
multiplied by the number of its translates is the cardinal of the ambient type
- `MulAction.IsBlock.eq_univ_of_card_lt` : a too large block is equal to `Set.univ`
- `MulAction.IsBlock.subsingleton_of_card_lt` : a too small block is a subsingleton
- `MulAction.IsBlock.of_subset` : the intersections of the translates of a finite subset
that contain a given point is a block
- `MulAction.BlockMem` : the type of blocks containing a given element
- `MulAction.BlockMem.instBoundedOrder` :
the type of blocks containing a given element is a bounded order.
## References
We follow [Wielandt-1964].
-/
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace MulAction
section orbits
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {X : Type*} [MulAction G X]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.eq_or_disjoint (a b : X) :
orbit G a = orbit G b ∨ Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b) := by
apply (em (Disjoint (orbit G a) (orbit G b))).symm.imp _ id
simp +contextual
only [Set.not_disjoint_iff, ← orbit_eq_iff, forall_exists_index, and_imp, eq_comm, implies_true]
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit.pairwiseDisjoint :
(Set.range fun x : X => orbit G x).PairwiseDisjoint id := by
rintro s ⟨x, rfl⟩ t ⟨y, rfl⟩ h
contrapose! h
exact (orbit.eq_or_disjoint x y).resolve_right h
/-- Orbits of an element form a partition -/
@[to_additive "Orbits of an element form a partition"]
theorem IsPartition.of_orbits :
Setoid.IsPartition (Set.range fun a : X => orbit G a) := by
apply orbit.pairwiseDisjoint.isPartition_of_exists_of_ne_empty
· intro x
exact ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, mem_orbit_self x⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha : orbit G a = ∅⟩
exact (MulAction.orbit_nonempty a).ne_empty ha
end orbits
section SMul
variable (G : Type*) {X : Type*} [SMul G X] {B : Set X} {a : X}
-- Change terminology to IsFullyInvariant?
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g • B = B` for all `g : G`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `B` is a `G`-fixed block if `g +ᵥ B = B` for all `g : G`."]
def IsFixedBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B = B
/-- A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g • B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. -/
@[to_additive
"A set `B` is a `G`-invariant block if `g +ᵥ B ⊆ B` for all `g : G`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. "]
def IsInvariantBlock (B : Set X) := ∀ g : G, g • B ⊆ B
section IsTrivialBlock
/-- A trivial block is a `Set X` which is either a subsingleton or `univ`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group. -/
@[to_additive
"A trivial block is a `Set X` which is either a subsingleton or `univ`.
Note: It is not necessarily a block when the action is not by a group."]
def IsTrivialBlock (B : Set X) := B.Subsingleton ∨ B = univ
variable {M α N β : Type*}
section monoid
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M α] [Monoid N] [MulAction N β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.image {φ : M → N} {f : α →ₑ[φ] β}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) {B : Set α} (hB : IsTrivialBlock B) :
IsTrivialBlock (f '' B) := by
obtain hB | hB := hB
· apply Or.intro_left; apply Set.Subsingleton.image hB
· apply Or.intro_right; rw [hB]
simp only [Set.top_eq_univ, Set.image_univ, Set.range_eq_univ, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.preimage {φ : M → N} {f : α →ₑ[φ] β}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {B : Set β} (hB : IsTrivialBlock B) :
IsTrivialBlock (f ⁻¹' B) := by
obtain hB | hB := hB
· apply Or.intro_left; exact Set.Subsingleton.preimage hB hf
· apply Or.intro_right; simp only [hB, Set.top_eq_univ]; apply Set.preimage_univ
end monoid
variable [Group M] [MulAction M α] [Monoid N] [MulAction N β]
| @[to_additive]
theorem IsTrivialBlock.smul {B : Set α} (hB : IsTrivialBlock B) (g : M) :
IsTrivialBlock (g • B) := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Blocks.lean | 141 | 143 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Star-convex sets
This files defines star-convex sets (aka star domains, star-shaped set, radially convex set).
A set is star-convex at `x` if every segment from `x` to a point in the set is contained in the set.
This is the prototypical example of a contractible set in homotopy theory (by scaling every point
towards `x`), but has wider uses.
Note that this has nothing to do with star rings, `Star` and co.
## Main declarations
* `StarConvex 𝕜 x s`: `s` is star-convex at `x` with scalars `𝕜`.
## Implementation notes
Instead of saying that a set is star-convex, we say a set is star-convex *at a point*. This has the
advantage of allowing us to talk about convexity as being "everywhere star-convexity" and of making
the union of star-convex sets be star-convex.
Incidentally, this choice means we don't need to assume a set is nonempty for it to be star-convex.
Concretely, the empty set is star-convex at every point.
## TODO
Balanced sets are star-convex.
The closure of a star-convex set is star-convex.
Star-convex sets are contractible.
A nonempty open star-convex set in `ℝ^n` is diffeomorphic to the entire space.
-/
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (x : E) (s : Set E)
/-- Star-convexity of sets. `s` is star-convex at `x` if every segment from `x` to a point in `s` is
contained in `s`. -/
def StarConvex (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E] (x : E) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃y : E⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s
variable {𝕜 x s} {t : Set E}
theorem starConvex_iff_segment_subset : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro h y hy z ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h hy ha hb hab
· rintro h y hy a b ha hb hab
exact h hy ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
theorem StarConvex.segment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) : [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
starConvex_iff_segment_subset.1 h hy
theorem StarConvex.openSegment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
(openSegment_subset_segment 𝕜 x y).trans (h.segment_subset hy)
/-- Alternative definition of star-convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
theorem starConvex_iff_pointwise_add_subset :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • {x} + b • s ⊆ s := by
refine
⟨?_, fun h y hy a b ha hb hab =>
h ha hb hab (add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set <| mem_singleton _) ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩)⟩
rintro hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, rfl : u = x, rfl⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact hA hv ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_empty (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x ∅ := fun _ hy => hy.elim
theorem starConvex_univ (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x univ := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => trivial
theorem StarConvex.inter (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab => ⟨hs hy.left ha hb hab, ht hy.right ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂₀ S) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab s hs => h s hs (hy s hs) ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ i, s i) :=
sInter_range s ▸ starConvex_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem starConvex_iInter₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i j)) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) :=
starConvex_iInter fun i => starConvex_iInter (h i)
theorem StarConvex.union (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∪ t) := by
rintro y (hy | hy) a b ha hb hab
· exact Or.inl (hs hy ha hb hab)
· exact Or.inr (ht hy ha hb hab)
theorem starConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hs : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hy ⊢
obtain ⟨i, hy⟩ := hy
exact ⟨i, hs i hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_iUnion₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i j)) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) :=
starConvex_iUnion fun i => starConvex_iUnion (h i)
theorem starConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact starConvex_iUnion fun s => hS _ s.2
theorem StarConvex.prod {y : F} {s : Set E} {t : Set F} (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s)
(ht : StarConvex 𝕜 y t) : StarConvex 𝕜 (x, y) (s ×ˢ t) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
⟨hs hy.1 ha hb hab, ht hy.2 ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (E i)] [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)]
{x : ∀ i, E i} {s : Set ι} {t : ∀ i, Set (E i)} (ht : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → StarConvex 𝕜 (x i) (t i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (s.pi t) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab i hi => ht hi (hy i hi) ha hb hab
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {x y z : E} {s : Set E}
theorem StarConvex.mem [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (h : s.Nonempty) : x ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h
convert hs hy zero_le_one le_rfl (add_zero 1)
rw [one_smul, zero_smul, add_zero]
theorem starConvex_iff_forall_pos (hx : x ∈ s) : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔
∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h y hy a b ha hb hab => h hy ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
intro h y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | ha := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
rwa [hab, one_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
obtain rfl | hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
rwa [hab, one_smul, zero_smul, add_zero]
exact h hy ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_iff_forall_ne_pos (hx : x ∈ s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔
∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hy ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
intro h y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
rwa [hab, zero_smul, one_smul, zero_add]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
rwa [hab, zero_smul, one_smul, add_zero]
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rwa [Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hy hxy ha' hb' hab
theorem starConvex_iff_openSegment_subset [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hx : x ∈ s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
starConvex_iff_segment_subset.trans <|
forall₂_congr fun _ hy => (openSegment_subset_iff_segment_subset hx hy).symm
theorem starConvex_singleton (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x {x} := by
rintro y (rfl : y = x) a b _ _ hab
exact Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem StarConvex.linear_image (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
exact ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hy ha hb hab, by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StarConvex.is_linear_image (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image <| hf.mk' f
theorem StarConvex.linear_preimage {s : Set F} (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 (f x) s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (f ⁻¹' s) := by
| intro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]
exact hs hy ha hb hab
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Star.lean | 205 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
/-!
# Absolute values in ordered groups
The absolute value of an element in a group which is also a lattice is its supremum with its
negation. This generalizes the usual absolute value on real numbers (`|x| = max x (-x)`).
## Notations
- `|a|`: The *absolute value* of an element `a` of an additive lattice ordered group
- `|a|ₘ`: The *absolute value* of an element `a` of a multiplicative lattice ordered group
-/
open Function
variable {G : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_pow (n : ℕ) (a : G) : |a ^ n|ₘ = |a|ₘ ^ n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 1
· rw [mabs_of_le_one ha, ← mabs_inv, ← inv_pow, mabs_of_one_le]
exact one_le_pow_of_one_le' (one_le_inv'.2 ha) n
· rw [mabs_of_one_le ha, mabs_of_one_le (one_le_pow_of_one_le' ha n)]
@[to_additive] private lemma mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le (hab : a ≤ b) :
|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1 := by
obtain ha | ha := le_or_lt 1 a <;> obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt 1 b
· simp [ha, hb, mabs_of_one_le, one_le_mul ha hb]
· exact (lt_irrefl (1 : G) <| ha.trans_lt <| hab.trans_lt hb).elim
swap
· simp [ha.le, hb.le, mabs_of_le_one, mul_le_one', mul_comm]
have : (|a * b|ₘ = a⁻¹ * b ↔ b ≤ 1) ↔
(|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1) := by
simp [ha.le, ha.not_le, hb, mabs_of_le_one, mabs_of_one_le]
refine this.mp ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simp only [h.antisymm hb, mabs_of_lt_one ha, mul_one]⟩
obtain ab | ab := le_or_lt (a * b) 1
· refine (eq_one_of_inv_eq' ?_).le
rwa [mabs_of_le_one ab, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm, mul_right_inj] at h
· rw [mabs_of_one_lt ab, mul_left_inj] at h
rw [eq_one_of_inv_eq' h.symm] at ha
cases ha.false
@[to_additive] lemma mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_iff (a b : G) :
|a * b|ₘ = |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ ↔ 1 ≤ a ∧ 1 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 1 ∧ b ≤ 1 := by
obtain ab | ab := le_total a b
· exact mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le ab
· simpa only [mul_comm, and_comm] using mabs_mul_eq_mul_mabs_le ab
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_le : |a|ₘ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b := by rw [mabs_le', and_comm, inv_le']
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mabs' : a ≤ |b|ₘ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ ∨ a ≤ b := by rw [le_mabs, or_comm, le_inv']
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_of_mabs_le (h : |a|ₘ ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
(mabs_le.mp h).1
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mabs_le (h : |a|ₘ ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
(mabs_le.mp h).2
/-- The **triangle inequality** in `LinearOrderedCommGroup`s. -/
@[to_additive "The **triangle inequality** in `LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`s."]
theorem mabs_mul (a b : G) : |a * b|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ := by
rw [mabs_le, mul_inv]
constructor <;> gcongr <;> apply_rules [inv_mabs_le, le_mabs_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mul' (a b : G) : |a|ₘ ≤ |b|ₘ * |b * a|ₘ := by simpa using mabs_mul b⁻¹ (b * a)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div (a b : G) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mabs_inv b]
exact mabs_mul a _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_iff : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c ↔ a / b ≤ c ∧ b / a ≤ c := by
rw [mabs_le, inv_le_div_iff_le_mul, div_le_iff_le_mul', and_comm, div_le_iff_le_mul']
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_lt_iff : |a / b|ₘ < c ↔ a / b < c ∧ b / a < c := by
rw [mabs_lt, inv_lt_div_iff_lt_mul', div_lt_iff_lt_mul', and_comm, div_lt_iff_lt_mul']
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_of_mabs_div_le_left (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c) : b / c ≤ a :=
div_le_comm.1 <| (mabs_div_le_iff.1 h).2
@[to_additive]
theorem div_le_of_mabs_div_le_right (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b :=
div_le_of_mabs_div_le_left (mabs_div_comm a b ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_left (h : |a / b|ₘ < c) : b / c < a :=
div_lt_comm.1 <| (mabs_div_lt_iff.1 h).2
@[to_additive]
theorem div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_right (h : |a / b|ₘ < c) : a / c < b :=
div_lt_of_mabs_div_lt_left (mabs_div_comm a b ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div (a b : G) : |a|ₘ / |b|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ :=
div_le_iff_le_mul.2 <|
calc
|a|ₘ = |a / b * b|ₘ := by rw [div_mul_cancel]
_ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b|ₘ := mabs_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div (a b : G) : |(|a|ₘ / |b|ₘ)|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ :=
mabs_div_le_iff.2
⟨mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div _ _, by rw [mabs_div_comm]; apply mabs_div_mabs_le_mabs_div⟩
/-- `|a / b|ₘ ≤ n` if `1 ≤ a ≤ n` and `1 ≤ b ≤ n`. -/
@[to_additive "`|a - b| ≤ n` if `0 ≤ a ≤ n` and `0 ≤ b ≤ n`."]
theorem mabs_div_le_of_one_le_of_le {a b n : G} (one_le_a : 1 ≤ a) (a_le_n : a ≤ n)
(one_le_b : 1 ≤ b) (b_le_n : b ≤ n) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ n := by
rw [mabs_div_le_iff, div_le_iff_le_mul, div_le_iff_le_mul]
exact ⟨le_mul_of_le_of_one_le a_le_n one_le_b, le_mul_of_le_of_one_le b_le_n one_le_a⟩
/-- `|a - b| < n` if `0 ≤ a < n` and `0 ≤ b < n`. -/
@[to_additive "`|a / b|ₘ < n` if `1 ≤ a < n` and `1 ≤ b < n`."]
theorem mabs_div_lt_of_one_le_of_lt {a b n : G} (one_le_a : 1 ≤ a) (a_lt_n : a < n)
(one_le_b : 1 ≤ b) (b_lt_n : b < n) : |a / b|ₘ < n := by
rw [mabs_div_lt_iff, div_lt_iff_lt_mul, div_lt_iff_lt_mul]
exact ⟨lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le a_lt_n one_le_b, lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le b_lt_n one_le_a⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_eq (hb : 1 ≤ b) : |a|ₘ = b ↔ a = b ∨ a = b⁻¹ := by
refine ⟨eq_or_eq_inv_of_mabs_eq, ?_⟩
rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [mabs_inv, mabs_of_one_le hb]
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_le_max_mabs_mabs (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : |b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |c|ₘ :=
mabs_le'.2
⟨by simp [hbc.trans (le_mabs_self c)], by
simp [(inv_le_inv_iff.mpr hab).trans (inv_le_mabs a)]⟩
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem min_mabs_mabs_le_mabs_max : min |a|ₘ |b|ₘ ≤ |max a b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (min_le_right _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (max_eq_right h).symm)
fun h => (min_le_left _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (max_eq_left h).symm
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem min_mabs_mabs_le_mabs_min : min |a|ₘ |b|ₘ ≤ |min a b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (min_le_left _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (min_eq_left h).symm)
fun h => (min_le_right _ _).trans_eq <| congr_arg _ (min_eq_right h).symm
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_max_le_max_mabs_mabs : |max a b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (congr_arg _ <| max_eq_right h).trans_le <| le_max_right _ _)
fun h => (congr_arg _ <| max_eq_left h).trans_le <| le_max_left _ _
omit [IsOrderedMonoid G] in
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_min_le_max_mabs_mabs : |min a b|ₘ ≤ max |a|ₘ |b|ₘ :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => (congr_arg _ <| min_eq_left h).trans_le <| le_max_left _ _) fun h =>
(congr_arg _ <| min_eq_right h).trans_le <| le_max_right _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_mabs_div_eq_one {a b : G} (h : |a / b|ₘ = 1) : a = b :=
div_eq_one.1 <| mabs_eq_one.1 h
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le (a b c : G) : |a / c|ₘ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b / c|ₘ :=
calc
|a / c|ₘ = |a / b * (b / c)|ₘ := by rw [div_mul_div_cancel]
_ ≤ |a / b|ₘ * |b / c|ₘ := mabs_mul _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_mul_three (a b c : G) : |a * b * c|ₘ ≤ |a|ₘ * |b|ₘ * |c|ₘ :=
(mabs_mul _ _).trans (mul_le_mul_right' (mabs_mul _ _) _)
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_of_le_of_le {a b lb ub : G} (hal : lb ≤ a) (hau : a ≤ ub) (hbl : lb ≤ b)
(hbu : b ≤ ub) : |a / b|ₘ ≤ ub / lb :=
mabs_div_le_iff.2 ⟨div_le_div'' hau hbl, div_le_div'' hbu hal⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias dist_bdd_within_interval := abs_sub_le_of_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_mabs_div_le_one (h : |a / b|ₘ ≤ 1) : a = b :=
eq_of_mabs_div_eq_one (le_antisymm h (one_le_mabs (a / b)))
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mabs_div_lt_all {x y : G} (h : ∀ ε > 1, |x / y|ₘ < ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_mabs_div_le_one <| forall_lt_iff_le'.mp h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mabs_div_le_all [DenselyOrdered G] {x y : G} (h : ∀ ε > 1, |x / y|ₘ ≤ ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_mabs_div_le_one <| forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense.mp h
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_le_one : |a / b|ₘ ≤ 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_mabs_div_le_one, by rintro rfl; rw [div_self', mabs_one]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mabs_div_pos : 1 < |a / b|ₘ ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_le.symm.trans mabs_div_le_one.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mabs_eq_self : |a|ₘ = a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
rw [mabs_eq_max_inv, max_eq_left_iff, inv_le_self_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mabs_eq_inv_self : |a|ₘ = a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by
rw [mabs_eq_max_inv, max_eq_right_iff, le_inv_self_iff]
/-- For an element `a` of a multiplicative linear ordered group,
either `|a|ₘ = a` and `1 ≤ a`, or `|a|ₘ = a⁻¹` and `a < 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"For an element `a` of an additive linear ordered group,
either `|a| = a` and `0 ≤ a`, or `|a| = -a` and `a < 0`.
Use cases on this lemma to automate linarith in inequalities"]
theorem mabs_cases (a : G) : |a|ₘ = a ∧ 1 ≤ a ∨ |a|ₘ = a⁻¹ ∧ a < 1 := by
cases le_or_lt 1 a <;> simp [*, le_of_lt]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem max_one_mul_max_inv_one_eq_mabs_self (a : G) : max a 1 * max a⁻¹ 1 = |a|ₘ := by
symm
rcases le_total 1 a with (ha | ha) <;> simp [ha]
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_abs_le_mul_of_one_le' {H : Type*} [MulOneClass H] [LE H]
[MulLeftMono H] [MulRightMono H] {f : G → H}
{a : G} (h₁ : 1 ≤ f a) (h₂ : 1 ≤ f (-a)) : f |a| ≤ f a * f (-a) :=
(le_total a 0).rec (fun ha => (abs_of_nonpos ha).symm ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_left' h₁) fun ha =>
(abs_of_nonneg ha).symm ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_right' h₂
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_abs_le_mul_of_one_le {H : Type*} [MulOneClass H] [LE H]
[MulLeftMono H] [MulRightMono H] {f : G → H}
(h : ∀ x, 1 ≤ f x) (a : G) : f |a| ≤ f a * f (-a) :=
apply_abs_le_mul_of_one_le' (h _) (h _)
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Abs.lean | 472 | 475 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
/-!
# `norm_num` plugins for `Rat.cast` and `⁻¹`.
-/
variable {u : Lean.Level}
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfRing {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero ring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `Ring α`, if it exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfRing? {α : Q(Type u)} (_i : Q(Ring $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero AddMonoidWithOne"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `AddMonoidWithOne α`, if it
exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfAddMonoidWithOne? {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(AddMonoidWithOne $α) := by with_reducible assumption) :
MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`. -/
def inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM Q(CharZero $α) :=
return ← synthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α) <|>
throwError "not a characteristic zero division ring"
/-- Helper function to synthesize a typed `CharZero α` expression given `DivisionRing α`, if it
exists. -/
def inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing? {α : Q(Type u)}
(_i : Q(DivisionRing $α) := by with_reducible assumption) : MetaM (Option Q(CharZero $α)) :=
return (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption
theorem isRat_mkRat : {a na n : ℤ} → {b nb d : ℕ} → IsInt a na → IsNat b nb →
IsRat (na / nb : ℚ) n d → IsRat (mkRat a b) n d
| _, _, _, _, _, _, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨_, h⟩ => by rw [Rat.mkRat_eq_div]; exact ⟨_, h⟩
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM in
/-- The `norm_num` extension which identifies expressions of the form `mkRat a b`,
such that `norm_num` successfully recognises both `a` and `b`, and returns `a / b`. -/
@[norm_num mkRat _ _]
def evalMkRat : NormNumExt where eval {u α} (e : Q(ℚ)) : MetaM (Result e) := do
let .app (.app (.const ``mkRat _) (a : Q(ℤ))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← whnfR e | failure
haveI' : $e =Q mkRat $a $b := ⟨⟩
let ra ← derive a
let some ⟨_, na, pa⟩ := ra.toInt (q(Int.instRing) : Q(Ring Int)) | failure
let ⟨nb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat q($b) q(AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne)
let rab ← derive q($na / $nb : Rat)
let ⟨q, n, d, p⟩ ← rab.toRat' q(Rat.instDivisionRing)
return .isRat' _ q n d q(isRat_mkRat $pa $pb $p)
theorem isNat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℕ} →
IsNat q n → IsNat (q : R) n
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem isInt_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℤ} →
IsInt q n → IsInt (q : R) n
| _, _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
theorem isRat_ratCast {R : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] : {q : ℚ} → {n : ℤ} → {d : ℕ} →
IsRat q n d → IsRat (q : R) n d
| _, _, _, ⟨⟨qi,_,_⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨qi, by norm_cast, by norm_cast⟩, by simp only []; norm_cast⟩
/-- The `norm_num` extension which identifies an expression `RatCast.ratCast q` where `norm_num`
recognizes `q`, returning the cast of `q`. -/
@[norm_num Rat.cast _, RatCast.ratCast _] def evalRatCast : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do
let dα ← inferDivisionRing α
let .app r (a : Q(ℚ)) ← whnfR e | failure
guard <|← withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq r q(Rat.cast (K := $α))
let r ← derive q($a)
haveI' : $e =Q Rat.cast $a := ⟨⟩
match r with
| .isNat _ na pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
return .isNat _ na q(isNat_ratCast $pa)
| .isNegNat _ na pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
return .isNegNat _ na q(isInt_ratCast $pa)
| .isRat _ qa na da pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
let i ← inferCharZeroOfDivisionRing dα
return .isRat dα qa na da q(isRat_ratCast $pa)
| _ => failure
theorem isRat_inv_pos {α} [DivisionRing α] [CharZero α] {a : α} {n d : ℕ} :
IsRat a (.ofNat (Nat.succ n)) d → IsRat a⁻¹ (.ofNat d) (Nat.succ n) := by
rintro ⟨_, rfl⟩
have := invertibleOfNonzero (α := α) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (Nat.succ_ne_zero n))
exact ⟨this, by simp⟩
theorem isRat_inv_one {α} [DivisionRing α] : {a : α} →
IsNat a (nat_lit 1) → IsNat a⁻¹ (nat_lit 1)
| _, ⟨rfl⟩ => ⟨by simp⟩
|
theorem isRat_inv_zero {α} [DivisionRing α] : {a : α} →
IsNat a (nat_lit 0) → IsNat a⁻¹ (nat_lit 0)
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Inv.lean | 116 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by
rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop]
· simpa only [finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulSupport_mulIndicator]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the value of `g` at the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `g (f i)` over `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an additive monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the
value of `g` at the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `g (f i)` over `s`."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem (f : α → M) (g : M →* N) (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_mem' (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod_mem (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_mem f hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod_mem f hs).symm
|
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` divided by the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 641 | 644 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex J. Best. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Body
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
/-!
# Geometry of numbers
In this file we prove some of the fundamental theorems in the geometry of numbers, as studied by
Hermann Minkowski.
## Main results
* `exists_pair_mem_lattice_not_disjoint_vadd`: Blichfeldt's principle, existence of two distinct
points in a subgroup such that the translates of a set by these two points are not disjoint when
the covolume of the subgroup is larger than the volume of the set.
* `exists_ne_zero_mem_lattice_of_measure_mul_two_pow_lt_measure`: Minkowski's theorem, existence of
a non-zero lattice point inside a convex symmetric domain of large enough volume.
## TODO
* Calculate the volume of the fundamental domain of a finite index subgroup
* Voronoi diagrams
* See [Pete L. Clark, *Abstract Geometry of Numbers: Linear Forms* (arXiv)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2119)
for some more ideas.
## References
* [Pete L. Clark, *Geometry of Numbers with Applications to Number Theory*][clark_gon] p.28
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
open ENNReal Module MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Filter
open scoped Pointwise NNReal
variable {E L : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {μ : Measure E} {F s : Set E}
/-- **Blichfeldt's Theorem**. If the volume of the set `s` is larger than the covolume of the
countable subgroup `L` of `E`, then there exist two distinct points `x, y ∈ L` such that `(x + s)`
and `(y + s)` are not disjoint. -/
theorem exists_pair_mem_lattice_not_disjoint_vadd [AddGroup L] [Countable L] [AddAction L E]
[MeasurableSpace L] [MeasurableVAdd L E] [VAddInvariantMeasure L E μ]
(fund : IsAddFundamentalDomain L F μ) (hS : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (h : μ F < μ s) :
∃ x y : L, x ≠ y ∧ ¬Disjoint (x +ᵥ s) (y +ᵥ s) := by
contrapose! h
exact ((fund.measure_eq_tsum _).trans (measure_iUnion₀
(Pairwise.mono h fun i j hij => (hij.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left).aedisjoint)
fun _ => (hS.vadd _).inter fund.nullMeasurableSet).symm).trans_le
(measure_mono <| Set.iUnion_subset fun _ => Set.inter_subset_right)
/-- The **Minkowski Convex Body Theorem**. If `s` is a convex symmetric domain of `E` whose volume
is large enough compared to the covolume of a lattice `L` of `E`, then it contains a non-zero
lattice point of `L`. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_lattice_of_measure_mul_two_pow_lt_measure [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
{L : AddSubgroup E} [Countable L] (fund : IsAddFundamentalDomain L F μ)
| (h_symm : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (h_conv : Convex ℝ s) (h : μ F * 2 ^ finrank ℝ E < μ s) :
∃ x ≠ 0, ((x : L) : E) ∈ s := by
have h_vol : μ F < μ ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) • s) := by
rw [addHaar_smul_of_nonneg μ (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)⁻¹) s, ←
mul_lt_mul_right (pow_ne_zero (finrank ℝ E) (two_ne_zero' _)) (pow_ne_top ofNat_ne_top),
mul_right_comm, ofReal_pow (by norm_num : 0 ≤ (2 : ℝ)⁻¹), ofReal_inv_of_pos zero_lt_two]
norm_num
rwa [← mul_pow, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel two_ne_zero ofNat_ne_top, one_pow, one_mul]
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, h⟩ :=
exists_pair_mem_lattice_not_disjoint_vadd fund ((h_conv.smul _).nullMeasurableSet _) h_vol
obtain ⟨_, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, w, hw, hvw⟩ := Set.not_disjoint_iff.mp h
refine ⟨x - y, sub_ne_zero.2 hxy, ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)] at hv hw
simp_rw [AddSubgroup.vadd_def, vadd_eq_add, add_comm _ w, ← sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, ←
AddSubgroup.coe_sub] at hvw
rw [← hvw, ← inv_smul_smul₀ (two_ne_zero' ℝ) (_ - _), smul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, smul_add]
refine h_conv hw (h_symm _ hv) ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> norm_num
/-- The **Minkowski Convex Body Theorem for compact domain**. If `s` is a convex compact symmetric
domain of `E` whose volume is large enough compared to the covolume of a lattice `L` of `E`, then it
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/GeometryOfNumbers.lean | 64 | 83 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.CubicDiscriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Weierstrass equations of elliptic curves
This file defines the structure of an elliptic curve as a nonsingular Weierstrass curve given by a
Weierstrass equation, which is mathematically accurate in many cases but also good for computation.
## Mathematical background
Let `S` be a scheme. The actual category of elliptic curves over `S` is a large category, whose
objects are schemes `E` equipped with a map `E → S`, a section `S → E`, and some axioms (the map is
smooth and proper and the fibres are geometrically-connected one-dimensional group varieties). In
the special case where `S` is the spectrum of some commutative ring `R` whose Picard group is zero
(this includes all fields, all PIDs, and many other commutative rings) it can be shown (using a lot
of algebro-geometric machinery) that every elliptic curve `E` is a projective plane cubic isomorphic
to a Weierstrass curve given by the equation `Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y = X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆` for some `aᵢ`
in `R`, and such that a certain quantity called the discriminant of `E` is a unit in `R`. If `R` is
a field, this quantity divides the discriminant of a cubic polynomial whose roots over a splitting
field of `R` are precisely the `X`-coordinates of the non-zero 2-torsion points of `E`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve`: a Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Δ`: the discriminant of a Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.map`: the Weierstrass curve mapped over a ring homomorphism.
* `WeierstrassCurve.twoTorsionPolynomial`: the 2-torsion polynomial of a Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.IsElliptic`: typeclass asserting that a Weierstrass curve is an elliptic curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.j`: the j-invariant of an elliptic curve.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.twoTorsionPolynomial_disc`: the discriminant of a Weierstrass curve is a
constant factor of the cubic discriminant of its 2-torsion polynomial.
## Implementation notes
The definition of elliptic curves in this file makes sense for all commutative rings `R`, but it
only gives a type which can be beefed up to a category which is equivalent to the category of
elliptic curves over the spectrum `Spec(R)` of `R` in the case that `R` has trivial Picard group
`Pic(R)` or, slightly more generally, when its 12-torsion is trivial. The issue is that for a
general ring `R`, there might be elliptic curves over `Spec(R)` in the sense of algebraic geometry
which are not globally defined by a cubic equation valid over the entire base.
## References
* [N Katz and B Mazur, *Arithmetic Moduli of Elliptic Curves*][katz_mazur]
* [P Deligne, *Courbes Elliptiques: Formulaire (d'après J. Tate)*][deligne_formulaire]
* [J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, weierstrass equation, j invariant
-/
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow])
universe s u v w
/-! ## Weierstrass curves -/
/-- A Weierstrass curve `Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y = X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆` with parameters `aᵢ`. -/
@[ext]
structure WeierstrassCurve (R : Type u) where
/-- The `a₁` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₁ : R
/-- The `a₂` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₂ : R
/-- The `a₃` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₃ : R
/-- The `a₄` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₄ : R
/-- The `a₆` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
a₆ : R
namespace WeierstrassCurve
instance {R : Type u} [Inhabited R] : Inhabited <| WeierstrassCurve R :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default, default⟩⟩
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (W : WeierstrassCurve R)
section Quantity
/-! ### Standard quantities -/
/-- The `b₂` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₂ : R :=
W.a₁ ^ 2 + 4 * W.a₂
/-- The `b₄` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₄ : R :=
2 * W.a₄ + W.a₁ * W.a₃
/-- The `b₆` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₆ : R :=
W.a₃ ^ 2 + 4 * W.a₆
/-- The `b₈` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def b₈ : R :=
W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.a₆ + 4 * W.a₂ * W.a₆ - W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ + W.a₂ * W.a₃ ^ 2 - W.a₄ ^ 2
lemma b_relation : 4 * W.b₈ = W.b₂ * W.b₆ - W.b₄ ^ 2 := by
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈]
ring1
/-- The `c₄` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def c₄ : R :=
W.b₂ ^ 2 - 24 * W.b₄
/-- The `c₆` coefficient of a Weierstrass curve. -/
def c₆ : R :=
-W.b₂ ^ 3 + 36 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ - 216 * W.b₆
/-- The discriminant `Δ` of a Weierstrass curve. If `R` is a field, then this polynomial vanishes
if and only if the cubic curve cut out by this equation is singular. Sometimes only defined up to
sign in the literature; we choose the sign used by the LMFDB. For more discussion, see
[the LMFDB page on discriminants](https://www.lmfdb.org/knowledge/show/ec.discriminant). -/
def Δ : R :=
-W.b₂ ^ 2 * W.b₈ - 8 * W.b₄ ^ 3 - 27 * W.b₆ ^ 2 + 9 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ * W.b₆
lemma c_relation : 1728 * W.Δ = W.c₄ ^ 3 - W.c₆ ^ 2 := by
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈, c₄, c₆, Δ]
ring1
section CharTwo
variable [CharP R 2]
lemma b₂_of_char_two : W.b₂ = W.a₁ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₂]
linear_combination 2 * W.a₂ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b₄_of_char_two : W.b₄ = W.a₁ * W.a₃ := by
rw [b₄]
linear_combination W.a₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b₆_of_char_two : W.b₆ = W.a₃ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₆]
linear_combination 2 * W.a₆ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b₈_of_char_two :
W.b₈ = W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.a₆ + W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ + W.a₂ * W.a₃ ^ 2 + W.a₄ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₈]
linear_combination (2 * W.a₂ * W.a₆ - W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ - W.a₄ ^ 2) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma c₄_of_char_two : W.c₄ = W.a₁ ^ 4 := by
rw [c₄, b₂_of_char_two]
linear_combination -12 * W.b₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma c₆_of_char_two : W.c₆ = W.a₁ ^ 6 := by
rw [c₆, b₂_of_char_two]
linear_combination (18 * W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.b₄ - 108 * W.b₆ - W.a₁ ^ 6) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma Δ_of_char_two : W.Δ = W.a₁ ^ 4 * W.b₈ + W.a₃ ^ 4 + W.a₁ ^ 3 * W.a₃ ^ 3 := by
rw [Δ, b₂_of_char_two, b₄_of_char_two, b₆_of_char_two]
linear_combination (-W.a₁ ^ 4 * W.b₈ - 14 * W.a₃ ^ 4) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma b_relation_of_char_two : W.b₂ * W.b₆ = W.b₄ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination -W.b_relation + 2 * W.b₈ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
lemma c_relation_of_char_two : W.c₄ ^ 3 = W.c₆ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination -W.c_relation + 864 * W.Δ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 2
end CharTwo
section CharThree
variable [CharP R 3]
lemma b₂_of_char_three : W.b₂ = W.a₁ ^ 2 + W.a₂ := by
rw [b₂]
linear_combination W.a₂ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b₄_of_char_three : W.b₄ = -W.a₄ + W.a₁ * W.a₃ := by
rw [b₄]
linear_combination W.a₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b₆_of_char_three : W.b₆ = W.a₃ ^ 2 + W.a₆ := by
rw [b₆]
linear_combination W.a₆ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b₈_of_char_three :
W.b₈ = W.a₁ ^ 2 * W.a₆ + W.a₂ * W.a₆ - W.a₁ * W.a₃ * W.a₄ + W.a₂ * W.a₃ ^ 2 - W.a₄ ^ 2 := by
rw [b₈]
linear_combination W.a₂ * W.a₆ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma c₄_of_char_three : W.c₄ = W.b₂ ^ 2 := by
rw [c₄]
linear_combination -8 * W.b₄ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma c₆_of_char_three : W.c₆ = -W.b₂ ^ 3 := by
rw [c₆]
linear_combination (12 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ - 72 * W.b₆) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma Δ_of_char_three : W.Δ = -W.b₂ ^ 2 * W.b₈ - 8 * W.b₄ ^ 3 := by
rw [Δ]
linear_combination (-9 * W.b₆ ^ 2 + 3 * W.b₂ * W.b₄ * W.b₆) * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma b_relation_of_char_three : W.b₈ = W.b₂ * W.b₆ - W.b₄ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination W.b_relation - W.b₈ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
lemma c_relation_of_char_three : W.c₄ ^ 3 = W.c₆ ^ 2 := by
linear_combination -W.c_relation + 576 * W.Δ * CharP.cast_eq_zero R 3
end CharThree
end Quantity
section BaseChange
/-! ### Maps and base changes -/
variable {A : Type v} [CommRing A] (f : R →+* A)
/-- The Weierstrass curve mapped over a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* A`. -/
@[simps]
def map : WeierstrassCurve A :=
⟨f W.a₁, f W.a₂, f W.a₃, f W.a₄, f W.a₆⟩
variable (A) in
/-- The Weierstrass curve base changed to an algebra `A` over `R`. -/
abbrev baseChange [Algebra R A] : WeierstrassCurve A :=
W.map <| algebraMap R A
@[simp]
lemma map_b₂ : (W.map f).b₂ = f W.b₂ := by
simp only [b₂, map_a₁, map_a₂]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_b₄ : (W.map f).b₄ = f W.b₄ := by
simp only [b₄, map_a₁, map_a₃, map_a₄]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_b₆ : (W.map f).b₆ = f W.b₆ := by
simp only [b₆, map_a₃, map_a₆]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_b₈ : (W.map f).b₈ = f W.b₈ := by
simp only [b₈, map_a₁, map_a₂, map_a₃, map_a₄, map_a₆]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_c₄ : (W.map f).c₄ = f W.c₄ := by
| simp only [c₄, map_b₂, map_b₄]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_c₆ : (W.map f).c₆ = f W.c₆ := by
simp only [c₆, map_b₂, map_b₄, map_b₆]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_Δ : (W.map f).Δ = f W.Δ := by
simp only [Δ, map_b₂, map_b₄, map_b₆, map_b₈]
map_simp
@[simp]
lemma map_id : W.map (RingHom.id R) = W :=
rfl
lemma map_map {B : Type w} [CommRing B] (g : A →+* B) : (W.map f).map g = W.map (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_baseChange {S : Type s} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] {A : Type v} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
[Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] {B : Type w} [CommRing B] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S B]
[IsScalarTower R S B] (g : A →ₐ[S] B) : (W.baseChange A).map g = W.baseChange B :=
congr_arg W.map <| g.comp_algebraMap_of_tower R
lemma map_injective {f : R →+* A} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Weierstrass.lean | 258 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Partial sums of geometric series
This file determines the values of the geometric series $\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i$ and
$\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i y^{n-1-i}$ and variants thereof. We also provide some bounds on the
"geometric" sum of `a/b^i` where `a b : ℕ`.
## Main statements
* `geom_sum_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^i=\frac{x^n-x^m}{x-1}$ in a division ring.
* `geom_sum₂_Ico` proves that $\sum_{i=m}^{n-1} x^iy^{n - 1 - i}=\frac{x^n-y^{n-m}x^m}{x-y}$
in a field.
Several variants are recorded, generalising in particular to the case of a noncommutative ring in
which `x` and `y` commute. Even versions not using division or subtraction, valid in each semiring,
are recorded.
-/
variable {R K : Type*}
open Finset MulOpposite
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem geom_sum_succ {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = (x * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) + 1 := by
simp only [mul_sum, ← pow_succ', sum_range_succ', pow_zero]
theorem geom_sum_succ' {x : R} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = x ^ n + ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
(sum_range_succ _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
theorem geom_sum_zero (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 0, x ^ i = 0 :=
rfl
theorem geom_sum_one (x : R) : ∑ i ∈ range 1, x ^ i = 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem geom_sum_two {x : R} : ∑ i ∈ range 2, x ^ i = x + 1 := by simp [geom_sum_succ']
@[simp]
theorem zero_geom_sum : ∀ {n}, ∑ i ∈ range n, (0 : R) ^ i = if n = 0 then 0 else 1
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [geom_sum_succ']
simp [zero_geom_sum]
theorem one_geom_sum (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, (1 : R) ^ i = n := by simp
theorem op_geom_sum (x : R) (n : ℕ) : op (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, op x ^ i := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem op_geom_sum₂ (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ (n - 1 - i) * op x ^ i =
∑ i ∈ range n, op y ^ i * op x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect]
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le] at j_in
congr
apply tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_right j_in
theorem geom_sum₂_with_one (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * 1 ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_congr rfl fun i _ => by rw [one_pow, mul_one]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul_add {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n := by
let f : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun m i : ℕ => (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (m - 1 - i)
change (∑ i ∈ range n, (f n) i) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n
induction n with
| zero => rw [range_zero, sum_empty, zero_mul, zero_add, pow_zero, pow_zero]
| succ n ih =>
have f_last : f (n + 1) n = (x + y) ^ n := by
dsimp only [f]
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, Nat.add_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one]
have f_succ : ∀ i, i ∈ range n → f (n + 1) i = y * f n i := fun i hi => by
dsimp only [f]
have : Commute y ((x + y) ^ i) := (h.symm.add_right (Commute.refl y)).pow_right i
rw [← mul_assoc, this.eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ' y (n - 1 - i), add_tsub_cancel_right,
← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_comm 1 i]
have : i + 1 + (n - (i + 1)) = n := add_tsub_cancel_of_le (mem_range.mp hi)
rw [add_comm (i + 1)] at this
rw [← this, add_tsub_cancel_right, add_comm i 1, ← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [pow_succ' (x + y), add_mul, sum_range_succ_comm, add_mul, f_last, add_assoc,
(((Commute.refl x).add_right h).pow_right n).eq, sum_congr rfl f_succ, ← mul_sum,
pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, ← mul_add y, ih]
end Semiring
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_geom_sum [Ring R] {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range n, (-1 : R) ^ i = if Even n then 0 else 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ k hk =>
simp only [geom_sum_succ', Nat.even_add_one, hk]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.neg_one_pow, add_zero]
· rw [(Nat.not_even_iff_odd.1 h).neg_one_pow, neg_add_cancel]
theorem geom_sum₂_self {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) = n * x ^ (n - 1) :=
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (i + (n - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [← pow_add]
_ = ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ (n - 1) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ hi =>
congr_arg _ <| add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi
_ = #(range n) • x ^ (n - 1) := sum_const _
_ = n * x ^ (n - 1) := by rw [Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
/-- $x^n-y^n = (x-y) \sum x^ky^{n-1-k}$ reformulated without `-` signs. -/
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_add [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + y) ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * x + y ^ n = (x + y) ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
theorem geom_sum_mul_add [Semiring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (x + 1) ^ i) * x + 1 = (x + 1) ^ n := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_mul [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
have := (h.sub_left (Commute.refl y)).geom_sum₂_mul_add n
rw [sub_add_cancel] at this
rw [← this, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Commute.mul_neg_geom_sum₂ [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((y - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_mul, op_sub, op_geom_sum₂, op_pow]
simp [(Commute.op h.symm).geom_sum₂_mul n]
theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂ [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rw [← neg_sub (y ^ n), ← h.mul_neg_geom_sum₂, ← neg_mul, neg_sub]
theorem geom_sum₂_mul [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_mul n
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R] [AddLeftMono R]
[ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x y : R} (hxy : y ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ n := by
apply eq_tsub_of_add_eq
simpa only [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hxy] using geom_sum₂_mul_add (x - y) y n
theorem geom_sum₂_mul_of_le [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R] [AddLeftMono R]
[ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x y : R} (hxy : x ≤ y) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (y - x) = y ^ n - x ^ n := by
rw [← Finset.sum_range_reflect]
convert geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge hxy n using 3
simp_all only [Finset.mem_range]
rw [mul_comm]
congr
omega
theorem Commute.sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
Dvd.intro _ <| h.mul_geom_sum₂ _
theorem sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n :=
(Commute.all x y).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x y n : ℕ) : x - y ∣ x ^ n - y ^ n := by
rcases le_or_lt y x with h | h
· have : y ^ n ≤ x ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h _
exact mod_cast sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) n
· have : x ^ n ≤ y ^ n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left h.le _
exact (Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le this).symm ▸ dvd_zero (x - y)
theorem one_sub_dvd_one_sub_pow [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
1 - x ∣ 1 - x ^ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_left x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
theorem sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
x - 1 ∣ x ^ n - 1 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_pow n]
exact (Commute.one_right x).sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow n
lemma pow_one_sub_dvd_pow_mul_sub_one [Ring R] (x : R) (m n : ℕ) :
((x ^ m) - 1 : R) ∣ (x ^ (m * n) - 1) := by
rw [npow_mul]
exact sub_one_dvd_pow_sub_one (x := x ^ m) (n := n)
lemma nat_pow_one_sub_dvd_pow_mul_sub_one (x m n : ℕ) : x ^ m - 1 ∣ x ^ (m * n) - 1 := by
nth_rw 2 [← Nat.one_pow n]
rw [Nat.pow_mul x m n]
apply nat_sub_dvd_pow_sub_pow (x ^ m) 1
theorem Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) :
x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n := by
have h₁ := geom_sum₂_mul x (-y) n
rw [Odd.neg_pow h y, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_neg_eq_add] at h₁
exact Dvd.intro_left _ h₁
theorem Odd.nat_add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x y : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (h : Odd n) : x + y ∣ x ^ n + y ^ n :=
mod_cast Odd.add_dvd_pow_add_pow (x : ℤ) (↑y) h
theorem geom_sum_mul [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
have := (Commute.one_right x).geom_sum₂_mul n
rw [one_pow, geom_sum₂_with_one] at this
exact this
theorem geom_sum_mul_of_one_le [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R]
[AddLeftMono R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x : R} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - 1 := by
simpa using geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge hx n
theorem geom_sum_mul_of_le_one [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftReflectLE R]
[AddLeftMono R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [Sub R] [OrderedSub R] {x : R} (hx : x ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
simpa using geom_sum₂_mul_of_le hx n
theorem mul_geom_sum [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : ((x - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = x ^ n - 1 :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul (op x) n
theorem geom_sum_mul_neg [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 - x ^ n := by
have := congr_arg Neg.neg (geom_sum_mul x n)
rw [neg_sub, ← mul_neg, neg_sub] at this
exact this
theorem mul_neg_geom_sum [Ring R] (x : R) (n : ℕ) : ((1 - x) * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = 1 - x ^ n :=
op_injective <| by simpa using geom_sum_mul_neg (op x) n
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_comm [Semiring R] {x y : R} (n : ℕ)
(h : Commute x y) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
cases n; · simp
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
rw [← Finset.sum_flip]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
simpa [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hi))] using h.pow_pow _ _
theorem geom_sum₂_comm [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, y ^ i * x ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_comm n
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂ [DivisionRing K] {x y : K} (h' : Commute x y) (h : x ≠ y)
(n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h'.geom_sum₂_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
theorem geom₂_sum [Field K] {x y : K} (h : x ≠ y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂ h n
theorem geom₂_sum_of_gt [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
{x y : K} (h : y < x) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (x ^ n - y ^ n) / (x - y) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum₂_mul_of_ge h.le n)
theorem geom₂_sum_of_lt [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
{x y : K} (h : x < y) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) = (y ^ n - x ^ n) / (y - x) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum₂_mul_of_le h.le n)
theorem geom_sum_eq [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (h : x ≠ 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) := by
have : x - 1 ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← geom_sum_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
lemma geom_sum_of_one_lt {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h : 1 < x) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum_mul_of_one_le h.le n)
lemma geom_sum_of_lt_one {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h : x < 1) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i = (1 - x ^ n) / (1 - x) :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq (tsub_pos_of_lt h).ne' (geom_sum_mul_of_le_one h.le n)
theorem geom_sum_lt {x : K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[CanonicallyOrderedAdd K] [Sub K] [OrderedSub K]
(h0 : x ≠ 0) (h1 : x < 1) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i < (1 - x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero] at h0
rw [geom_sum_of_lt_one h1, div_lt_iff₀, inv_mul_cancel₀, tsub_lt_self_iff]
· exact ⟨h0.trans h1, pow_pos h0 n⟩
· rwa [ne_eq, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, not_le]
· rwa [tsub_pos_iff_lt]
protected theorem Commute.mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn]
have :
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * y ^ (n - 1 - k) =
∑ k ∈ range m, x ^ k * (y ^ (n - m) * y ^ (m - 1 - k)) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun j j_in => ?_
rw [← pow_add]
congr
rw [mem_range] at j_in
omega
rw [this]
simp_rw [pow_mul_comm y (n - m) _]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc]
rw [← sum_mul, mul_sub, h.mul_geom_sum₂, ← mul_assoc, h.mul_geom_sum₂, sub_mul, ← pow_add,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le hmn, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right (x ^ n) (x ^ m * y ^ (n - m)) (y ^ n)]
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_succ_eq [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
simp_rw [mul_sum, sum_range_succ_comm, tsub_self, pow_zero, mul_one, add_right_inj, ← mul_assoc,
(h.symm.pow_right _).eq, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ']
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
suffices n - 1 - i + 1 = n - i by rw [this]
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hi
omega
theorem geom_sum₂_succ_eq [CommRing R] (x y : R) {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i * y ^ (n - i) =
x ^ n + y * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_succ_eq
theorem mul_geom_sum₂_Ico [CommRing R] (x y : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
((x - y) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = x ^ n - x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) :=
(Commute.all x y).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul [Ring R] {x y : R} (h : Commute x y) {m n : ℕ}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) * (x - y) = x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m := by
apply op_injective
simp only [op_sub, op_mul, op_pow, op_sum]
have : (∑ k ∈ Ico m n, MulOpposite.op y ^ (n - 1 - k) * MulOpposite.op x ^ k) =
∑ k ∈ Ico m n, MulOpposite.op x ^ k * MulOpposite.op y ^ (n - 1 - k) := by
refine sum_congr rfl fun k _ => ?_
have hp := Commute.pow_pow (Commute.op h.symm) (n - 1 - k) k
simpa [Commute, SemiconjBy] using hp
simp only [this]
convert (Commute.op h).mul_geom_sum₂_Ico hmn
theorem geom_sum_Ico_mul [Ring R] (x : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i) * (x - 1) = x ^ n - x ^ m := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, sub_mul, geom_sum_mul, geom_sum_mul, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem geom_sum_Ico_mul_neg [Ring R] (x : R) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = x ^ m - x ^ n := by
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, sub_mul, geom_sum_mul_neg, geom_sum_mul_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left]
protected theorem Commute.geom_sum₂_Ico [DivisionRing K] {x y : K} (h : Commute x y) (hxy : x ≠ y)
{m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = (x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m) / (x - y) := by
have : x - y ≠ 0 := by simp_all [sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rw [← h.geom_sum₂_Ico_mul hmn, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ this]
theorem geom_sum₂_Ico [Field K] {x y : K} (hxy : x ≠ y) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = (x ^ n - y ^ (n - m) * x ^ m) / (x - y) :=
(Commute.all x y).geom_sum₂_Ico hxy hmn
theorem geom_sum_Ico [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i = (x ^ n - x ^ m) / (x - 1) := by
simp only [sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hmn, geom_sum_eq hx, div_sub_div_same, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem geom_sum_Ico' [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 1) {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) :
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, x ^ i = (x ^ m - x ^ n) / (1 - x) := by
simp only [geom_sum_Ico hx hmn]
convert neg_div_neg_eq (x ^ m - x ^ n) (1 - x) using 2 <;> abel
theorem geom_sum_Ico_le_of_lt_one [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
{x : K} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x < 1)
{m n : ℕ} : ∑ i ∈ Ico m n, x ^ i ≤ x ^ m / (1 - x) := by
rcases le_or_lt m n with (hmn | hmn)
· rw [geom_sum_Ico' h'x.ne hmn]
apply div_le_div₀ (pow_nonneg hx _) _ (sub_pos.2 h'x) le_rfl
simpa using pow_nonneg hx _
· rw [Ico_eq_empty, sum_empty]
· apply div_nonneg (pow_nonneg hx _)
simpa using h'x.le
· simpa using hmn.le
theorem geom_sum_inv [DivisionRing K] {x : K} (hx1 : x ≠ 1) (hx0 : x ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x⁻¹ ^ i = (x - 1)⁻¹ * (x - x⁻¹ ^ n * x) := by
have h₁ : x⁻¹ ≠ 1 := by rwa [inv_eq_one_div, Ne, div_eq_iff_mul_eq hx0, one_mul]
have h₂ : x⁻¹ - 1 ≠ 0 := mt sub_eq_zero.1 h₁
have h₃ : x - 1 ≠ 0 := mt sub_eq_zero.1 hx1
have h₄ : x * (x ^ n)⁻¹ = (x ^ n)⁻¹ * x :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n h => by
rw [pow_succ', mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx0, mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hx0]
rw [geom_sum_eq h₁, div_eq_iff_mul_eq h₂, ← mul_right_inj' h₃, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃]
simp [mul_add, add_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx0, mul_assoc, h₄, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm,
add_left_comm]
rw [add_comm _ (-x), add_assoc, add_assoc _ _ 1]
variable {S : Type*}
-- TODO: for consistency, the next two lemmas should be moved to the root namespace
theorem RingHom.map_geom_sum [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (x : R) (n : ℕ) (f : R →+* S) :
f (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) = ∑ i ∈ range n, f x ^ i := by simp [map_sum f]
theorem RingHom.map_geom_sum₂ [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) (f : R →+* S) :
f (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) = ∑ i ∈ range n, f x ^ i * f y ^ (n - 1 - i) := by
simp [map_sum f]
/-! ### Geometric sum with `ℕ`-division -/
theorem Nat.pred_mul_geom_sum_le (a b n : ℕ) :
((b - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n.succ, a / b ^ i) ≤ a * b - a / b ^ n :=
calc
((b - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range n.succ, a / b ^ i) =
(∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ (i + 1) * b) + a * b - ((∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i) + a / b ^ n) := by
rw [tsub_mul, mul_comm, sum_mul, one_mul, sum_range_succ', sum_range_succ, pow_zero,
Nat.div_one]
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i) + a * b - ((∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i) + a / b ^ n) := by
gcongr with i hi
rw [pow_succ, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul]
exact Nat.div_mul_le_self _ _
_ = a * b - a / b ^ n := add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_left _ _ _
theorem Nat.geom_sum_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (a n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, a / b ^ i ≤ a * b / (b - 1) := by
refine (Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| tsub_pos_of_lt hb).2 ?_
rcases n with - | n
· rw [sum_range_zero, zero_mul]
exact Nat.zero_le _
rw [mul_comm]
exact (Nat.pred_mul_geom_sum_le a b n).trans tsub_le_self
theorem Nat.geom_sum_Ico_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (a n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ Ico 1 n, a / b ^ i ≤ a / (b - 1) := by
rcases n with - | n
· rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le (zero_le_one' ℕ), sum_empty]
exact Nat.zero_le _
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left a]
calc
(a + ∑ i ∈ Ico 1 n.succ, a / b ^ i) = a / b ^ 0 + ∑ i ∈ Ico 1 n.succ, a / b ^ i := by
rw [pow_zero, Nat.div_one]
_ = ∑ i ∈ range n.succ, a / b ^ i := by
rw [range_eq_Ico, ← Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left (Nat.succ_pos _), sum_insert]
exact fun h => zero_lt_one.not_le (mem_Ico.1 h).1
_ ≤ a * b / (b - 1) := Nat.geom_sum_le hb a _
_ = (a * 1 + a * (b - 1)) / (b - 1) := by
rw [← mul_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le (one_le_two.trans hb)]
_ = a + a / (b - 1) := by rw [mul_one, Nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ (tsub_pos_of_lt hb), add_comm]
section Order
variable {n : ℕ} {x : R}
theorem geom_sum_pos [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
sum_pos' (fun _ _ => pow_nonneg hx _) ⟨0, mem_range.2 hn.bot_lt, by simp⟩
theorem geom_sum_pos_and_lt_one [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(hx : x < 0) (hx' : 0 < x + 1) (hn : 1 < n) :
(0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) ∧ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i < 1 := by
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n (show 2 ≤ n from hn)
· rw [geom_sum_two]
exact ⟨hx', (add_lt_iff_neg_right _).2 hx⟩
clear hn
intro n _ ihn
rw [geom_sum_succ, add_lt_iff_neg_right, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add', neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact
⟨mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left (neg_nonneg.2 hx.le) (neg_lt_iff_pos_add'.2 hx') ihn.2.le,
mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hx ihn.1⟩
theorem geom_sum_alternating_of_le_neg_one [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
(hx : x + 1 ≤ 0) (n : ℕ) :
if Even n then (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) ≤ 0 else 1 ≤ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
have hx0 : x ≤ 0 := (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one).trans hx
induction n with
| zero => simp only [range_zero, sum_empty, le_refl, ite_true, Even.zero]
| succ n ih =>
simp only [Nat.even_add_one, geom_sum_succ]
split_ifs at ih with h
· rw [if_neg (not_not_intro h), le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos hx0 ih
· rw [if_pos h]
refine (add_le_add_right ?_ _).trans hx
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left ih hx0
theorem geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(hx : x + 1 < 0) (hn : 1 < n) :
if Even n then (∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) < 0 else 1 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
have hx0 : x < 0 := (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one).trans_lt hx
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n (show 2 ≤ n from hn)
· simp only [geom_sum_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left, ite_true, gt_iff_lt, hx, even_two]
clear hn
intro n _ ihn
simp only [Nat.even_add_one, geom_sum_succ]
by_cases hn' : Even n
· rw [if_pos hn'] at ihn
rw [if_neg, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
· exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg hx0 ihn
· exact not_not_intro hn'
· rw [if_neg hn'] at ihn
rw [if_pos]
swap
· exact hn'
have := add_lt_add_right (mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left ihn hx0) 1
rw [mul_one] at this
exact this.trans hx
theorem geom_sum_pos' [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(hx : 0 < x + 1) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n
· cases hn rfl
· simp only [zero_add, range_one, sum_singleton, pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
obtain hx' | hx' := lt_or_le x 0
· exact (geom_sum_pos_and_lt_one hx' hx n.one_lt_succ_succ).1
· exact geom_sum_pos hx' (by simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff])
theorem Odd.geom_sum_pos [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(h : Odd n) : 0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | k)
· exact (Nat.not_odd_zero h).elim
· simp only [zero_add, range_one, sum_singleton, pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
rw [← Nat.not_even_iff_odd] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy (x + 1) 0 with (hx | hx | hx)
· have := geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one hx k.one_lt_succ_succ
simp only [h, if_false] at this
exact zero_lt_one.trans this
· simp only [eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hx, h, neg_one_geom_sum, if_false, zero_lt_one]
· exact geom_sum_pos' hx k.succ.succ_ne_zero
theorem geom_sum_pos_iff [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(0 < ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) ↔ Odd n ∨ 0 < x + 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, ← not_le, Nat.not_odd_iff_even]
refine fun hn hx => h.not_le ?_
simpa [if_pos hn] using geom_sum_alternating_of_le_neg_one hx n
· rintro (hn | hx')
· exact hn.geom_sum_pos
· exact geom_sum_pos' hx' hn
theorem geom_sum_ne_zero [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
(hx : x ≠ -1) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i ≠ 0 := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n
· cases hn rfl
· simp only [zero_add, range_one, sum_singleton, pow_zero, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
rw [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← Ne] at hx
obtain h | h := hx.lt_or_lt
· have := geom_sum_alternating_of_lt_neg_one h n.one_lt_succ_succ
split_ifs at this
· exact this.ne
· exact (zero_lt_one.trans this).ne'
· exact (geom_sum_pos' h n.succ.succ_ne_zero).ne'
theorem geom_sum_eq_zero_iff_neg_one [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i = 0 ↔ x = -1 ∧ Even n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, @fun ⟨h, hn⟩ => by simp only [h, hn, neg_one_geom_sum, if_true]⟩
contrapose! h
have hx := eq_or_ne x (-1)
rcases hx with hx | hx
· rw [hx, neg_one_geom_sum]
simp only [h hx, ite_false, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
· exact geom_sum_ne_zero hx hn
theorem geom_sum_neg_iff [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i < 0 ↔ Even n ∧ x + 1 < 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, le_iff_lt_or_eq, eq_comm,
or_congr (geom_sum_pos_iff hn) (geom_sum_eq_zero_iff_neg_one hn), ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, not_and, not_lt, le_iff_lt_or_eq, eq_comm, ← imp_iff_not_or, or_comm,
and_comm, Decidable.and_or_imp, or_comm]
end Order
variable {m n : ℕ} {s : Finset ℕ}
/-- Value of a geometric sum over the naturals. Note: see `geom_sum_mul_add` for a formulation
that avoids division and subtraction. -/
lemma Nat.geomSum_eq (hm : 2 ≤ m) (n : ℕ) :
∑ k ∈ range n, m ^ k = (m ^ n - 1) / (m - 1) := by
refine (Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hm) <| tsub_eq_of_eq_add ?_).symm
simpa only [tsub_add_cancel_of_le (one_le_two.trans hm), eq_comm] using geom_sum_mul_add (m - 1) n
| /-- If all the elements of a finset of naturals are less than `n`, then the sum of their powers of
`m ≥ 2` is less than `m ^ n`. -/
lemma Nat.geomSum_lt (hm : 2 ≤ m) (hs : ∀ k ∈ s, k < n) : ∑ k ∈ s, m ^ k < m ^ n :=
calc
∑ k ∈ s, m ^ k ≤ ∑ k ∈ range n, m ^ k := sum_le_sum_of_subset fun _ hk ↦
mem_range.2 <| hs _ hk
_ = (m ^ n - 1) / (m - 1) := Nat.geomSum_eq hm _
_ ≤ m ^ n - 1 := Nat.div_le_self _ _
_ < m ^ n := tsub_lt_self (by positivity) zero_lt_one
| Mathlib/Algebra/GeomSum.lean | 598 | 606 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Paul Lezeau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsAdjoinRoot
/-!
# Kummer-Dedekind theorem
This file proves the monogenic version of the Kummer-Dedekind theorem on the splitting of prime
ideals in an extension of the ring of integers. This states that if `I` is a prime ideal of
Dedekind domain `R` and `S = R[α]` for some `α` that is integral over `R` with minimal polynomial
`f`, then the prime factorisations of `I * S` and `f mod I` have the same shape, i.e. they have the
same number of prime factors, and each prime factors of `I * S` can be paired with a prime factor
of `f mod I` in a way that ensures multiplicities match (in fact, this pairing can be made explicit
with a formula).
## Main definitions
* `normalizedFactorsMapEquivNormalizedFactorsMinPolyMk` : The bijection in the
Kummer-Dedekind theorem. This is the pairing between the prime factors of `I * S` and the prime
factors of `f mod I`.
## Main results
* `normalized_factors_ideal_map_eq_normalized_factors_min_poly_mk_map` : The Kummer-Dedekind
theorem.
* `Ideal.irreducible_map_of_irreducible_minpoly` : `I.map (algebraMap R S)` is irreducible if
`(map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) (minpoly R pb.gen))` is irreducible, where `pb` is a power basis
of `S` over `R`.
* `normalizedFactorsMapEquivNormalizedFactorsMinPolyMk_symm_apply_eq_span` : Let `Q` be a lift of
factor of the minimal polynomial of `x`, a generator of `S` over `R`, taken
`mod I`. Then (the reduction of) `Q` corresponds via
`normalizedFactorsMapEquivNormalizedFactorsMinPolyMk` to
`span (I.map (algebraMap R S) ∪ {Q.aeval x})`.
## TODO
* Prove the Kummer-Dedekind theorem in full generality.
* Prove the converse of `Ideal.irreducible_map_of_irreducible_minpoly`.
## References
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
kummer, dedekind, kummer dedekind, dedekind-kummer, dedekind kummer
-/
variable (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
open Ideal Polynomial DoubleQuot UniqueFactorizationMonoid Algebra RingHom
local notation:max R "<" x:max ">" => adjoin R ({x} : Set S)
/-- Let `S / R` be a ring extension and `x : S`, then the conductor of `R<x>` is the
biggest ideal of `S` contained in `R<x>`. -/
def conductor (x : S) : Ideal S where
carrier := {a | ∀ b : S, a * b ∈ R<x>}
zero_mem' b := by simpa only [zero_mul] using Subalgebra.zero_mem _
add_mem' ha hb c := by simpa only [add_mul] using Subalgebra.add_mem _ (ha c) (hb c)
smul_mem' c a ha b := by simpa only [smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using ha (c * b)
variable {R} {x : S}
theorem conductor_eq_of_eq {y : S} (h : (R<x> : Set S) = R<y>) : conductor R x = conductor R y :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => forall_congr' fun _ => Set.ext_iff.mp h _
theorem conductor_subset_adjoin : (conductor R x : Set S) ⊆ R<x> := fun y hy => by
simpa only [mul_one] using hy 1
theorem mem_conductor_iff {y : S} : y ∈ conductor R x ↔ ∀ b : S, y * b ∈ R<x> :=
⟨fun h => h, fun h => h⟩
theorem conductor_eq_top_of_adjoin_eq_top (h : R<x> = ⊤) : conductor R x = ⊤ := by
simp only [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, mem_conductor_iff, h, mem_top, forall_const]
theorem conductor_eq_top_of_powerBasis (pb : PowerBasis R S) : conductor R pb.gen = ⊤ :=
conductor_eq_top_of_adjoin_eq_top pb.adjoin_gen_eq_top
open IsLocalization in
lemma mem_coeSubmodule_conductor {L} [CommRing L] [Algebra S L] [Algebra R L]
[IsScalarTower R S L] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S L] {x : S} {y : L} :
y ∈ coeSubmodule L (conductor R x) ↔ ∀ z : S,
y * (algebraMap S L) z ∈ Algebra.adjoin R {algebraMap S L x} := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial L
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (coeSubmodule L _) ⊤, Subsingleton.elim (Algebra.adjoin R _) ⊤]; simp
trans ∀ z, y * (algebraMap S L) z ∈ (Algebra.adjoin R {x}).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S L)
· simp only [coeSubmodule, Submodule.mem_map, Algebra.linearMap_apply, Subalgebra.mem_map,
IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom']
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ z
exact ⟨_, hy z, map_mul _ _ _⟩
· intro H
obtain ⟨y, _, e⟩ := H 1
rw [map_one, mul_one] at e
subst e
simp only [← map_mul, (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective S L).eq_iff,
exists_eq_right] at H
exact ⟨_, H, rfl⟩
· rw [AlgHom.map_adjoin, Set.image_singleton]; rfl
variable {I : Ideal R}
/-- This technical lemma tell us that if `C` is the conductor of `R<x>` and `I` is an ideal of `R`
then `p * (I * S) ⊆ I * R<x>` for any `p` in `C ∩ R` -/
theorem prod_mem_ideal_map_of_mem_conductor {p : R} {z : S}
(hp : p ∈ Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) (conductor R x)) (hz' : z ∈ I.map (algebraMap R S)) :
algebraMap R S p * z ∈ algebraMap R<x> S '' ↑(I.map (algebraMap R R<x>)) := by
rw [Ideal.map, Ideal.span, Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination] at hz'
obtain ⟨l, H, H'⟩ := hz'
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply] at H'
rw [← H', mul_comm, Finsupp.sum_mul]
have lem : ∀ {a : R}, a ∈ I → l a • algebraMap R S a * algebraMap R S p ∈
algebraMap R<x> S '' I.map (algebraMap R R<x>) := by
intro a ha
rw [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc, Set.mem_image]
refine Exists.intro
(algebraMap R R<x> a * ⟨l a * algebraMap R S p,
show l a * algebraMap R S p ∈ R<x> from ?h⟩) ?_
case h =>
rw [mul_comm]
exact mem_conductor_iff.mp (Ideal.mem_comap.mp hp) _
· refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mul_comm]
apply Ideal.mul_mem_left (I.map (algebraMap R R<x>)) _ (Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ ha)
· simp only [RingHom.map_mul, mul_comm (algebraMap R S p) (l a)]
rfl
refine Finset.sum_induction _ (fun u => u ∈ algebraMap R<x> S '' I.map (algebraMap R R<x>))
(fun a b => ?_) ?_ ?_
· rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← RingHom.map_add]
exact ⟨z + y, Ideal.add_mem _ (SetLike.mem_coe.mp hz) hy, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨0, SetLike.mem_coe.mpr <| Ideal.zero_mem _, RingHom.map_zero _⟩
· intro y hy
exact lem ((Finsupp.mem_supported _ l).mp H hy)
/-- A technical result telling us that `(I * S) ∩ R<x> = I * R<x>` for any ideal `I` of `R`. -/
theorem comap_map_eq_map_adjoin_of_coprime_conductor
(hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤)
(h_alg : Function.Injective (algebraMap R<x> S)) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S)).comap (algebraMap R<x> S) = I.map (algebraMap R R<x>) := by
apply le_antisymm
· -- This is adapted from [Neukirch1992]. Let `C = (conductor R x)`. The idea of the proof
-- is that since `I` and `C ∩ R` are coprime, we have
-- `(I * S) ∩ R<x> ⊆ (I + C) * ((I * S) ∩ R<x>) ⊆ I * R<x> + I * C * S ⊆ I * R<x>`.
intro y hy
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := y
obtain ⟨p, hp, q, hq, hpq⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp ((Ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).mp hx)
have temp : algebraMap R S p * z + algebraMap R S q * z = z := by
simp only [← add_mul, ← RingHom.map_add (algebraMap R S), hpq, map_one, one_mul]
suffices z ∈ algebraMap R<x> S '' I.map (algebraMap R R<x>) ↔
(⟨z, hz⟩ : R<x>) ∈ I.map (algebraMap R R<x>) by
rw [← this, ← temp]
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp (prod_mem_ideal_map_of_mem_conductor hp
(show z ∈ I.map (algebraMap R S) by rwa [Ideal.mem_comap] at hy))
use a + algebraMap R R<x> q * ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Ideal.add_mem (I.map (algebraMap R R<x>)) ha.left ?_, by
simp only [ha.right, map_add, map_mul, add_right_inj]; rfl⟩
rw [mul_comm]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_left (I.map (algebraMap R R<x>)) _ (Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ hq)
refine ⟨fun h => ?_,
fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mpr (Exists.intro ⟨z, hz⟩ ⟨by simp [h], rfl⟩)⟩
obtain ⟨x₁, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp h
have : x₁ = ⟨z, hz⟩ := by
apply h_alg
simp only [hx₂, algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
rw [Submonoid.mk_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rwa [← this]
· -- The converse inclusion is trivial
have : algebraMap R S = (algebraMap _ S).comp (algebraMap R R<x>) := by ext; rfl
rw [this, ← Ideal.map_map]
apply Ideal.le_comap_map
/-- The canonical morphism of rings from `R<x> ⧸ (I*R<x>)` to `S ⧸ (I*S)` is an isomorphism
when `I` and `(conductor R x) ∩ R` are coprime. -/
noncomputable def quotAdjoinEquivQuotMap (hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤)
(h_alg : Function.Injective (algebraMap R<x> S)) :
R<x> ⧸ I.map (algebraMap R R<x>) ≃+* S ⧸ I.map (algebraMap R S) := by
let f : R<x> ⧸ I.map (algebraMap R R<x>) →+* S ⧸ I.map (algebraMap R S) :=
(Ideal.Quotient.lift (I.map (algebraMap R R<x>))
((Ideal.Quotient.mk (I.map (algebraMap R S))).comp (algebraMap R<x> S)) (fun r hr => by
have : algebraMap R S = (algebraMap R<x> S).comp (algebraMap R R<x>) := by ext; rfl
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, this, ← Ideal.map_map]
exact Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ hr))
refine RingEquiv.ofBijective f ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· --the kernel of the map is clearly `(I * S) ∩ R<x>`. To get injectivity, we need to show that
--this is contained in `I * R<x>`, which is the content of the previous lemma.
refine RingHom.lift_injective_of_ker_le_ideal _ _ fun u hu => ?_
rwa [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.comp_apply, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ← Ideal.mem_comap,
comap_map_eq_map_adjoin_of_coprime_conductor hx h_alg] at hu
· -- Surjectivity follows from the surjectivity of the canonical map `R<x> → S ⧸ (I * S)`,
-- which in turn follows from the fact that `I * S + (conductor R x) = S`.
refine Ideal.Quotient.lift_surjective_of_surjective _ _ fun y => ?_
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y
have : z ∈ conductor R x ⊔ I.map (algebraMap R S) := by
suffices conductor R x ⊔ I.map (algebraMap R S) = ⊤ by simp only [this, Submodule.mem_top]
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one] at hx ⊢
replace hx := Ideal.mem_map_of_mem (algebraMap R S) hx
rw [Ideal.map_sup, RingHom.map_one] at hx
exact (sup_le_sup
(show ((conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S)).map (algebraMap R S) ≤ conductor R x
from Ideal.map_comap_le)
(le_refl (I.map (algebraMap R S)))) hx
rw [← Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem_sup, hz, Ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective] at this
· obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := this
use ⟨u, conductor_subset_adjoin hu⟩
simp only [← hu']
rfl
· exact Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
@[simp]
theorem quotAdjoinEquivQuotMap_apply_mk (hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤)
(h_alg : Function.Injective (algebraMap R<x> S)) (a : R<x>) :
quotAdjoinEquivQuotMap hx h_alg (Ideal.Quotient.mk (I.map (algebraMap R R<x>)) a) =
Ideal.Quotient.mk (I.map (algebraMap R S)) ↑a := rfl
namespace KummerDedekind
open scoped Polynomial
variable [IsDomain R] [IsIntegrallyClosed R]
variable [IsDedekindDomain S]
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R S]
attribute [local instance] Ideal.Quotient.field
private noncomputable def f (hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤)
(hx' : IsIntegral R x) :
S ⧸ I.map (algebraMap R S) ≃+* (R ⧸ I)[X] ⧸ span {(minpoly R x).map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)} :=
(quotAdjoinEquivQuotMap hx (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective
(Algebra.adjoin R {x}) S)).symm.trans <|
((Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' hx').quotientEquivQuotientMinpolyMap I).toRingEquiv.trans <|
quotEquivOfEq (by rw [Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis'_minpoly_gen hx'])
private lemma f_symm_aux (hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤)
(hx' : IsIntegral R x) (Q : R[X]) :
(f hx hx').symm (Q.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) = Q.aeval x := by
apply (f hx hx').injective
rw [f, AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_trans_apply, RingEquiv.symm_symm,
RingEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply,
RingEquiv.symm_trans_apply, quotEquivOfEq_symm, quotEquivOfEq_mk]
congr
convert (adjoin.powerBasis' hx').quotientEquivQuotientMinpolyMap_symm_apply_mk I Q
apply (quotAdjoinEquivQuotMap hx
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective ((adjoin R {x})) S)).injective
simp only [RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen, quotAdjoinEquivQuotMap_apply_mk,
coe_aeval_mk_apply]
open Classical in
/-- The first half of the **Kummer-Dedekind Theorem** in the monogenic case, stating that the prime
factors of `I*S` are in bijection with those of the minimal polynomial of the generator of `S`
over `R`, taken `mod I`. -/
noncomputable def normalizedFactorsMapEquivNormalizedFactorsMinPolyMk (hI : IsMaximal I)
(hI' : I ≠ ⊥) (hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤) (hx' : IsIntegral R x) :
{J : Ideal S | J ∈ normalizedFactors (I.map (algebraMap R S))} ≃
{d : (R ⧸ I)[X] |
d ∈ normalizedFactors (Polynomial.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) (minpoly R x))} := by
refine (normalizedFactorsEquivOfQuotEquiv (f hx hx') ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rwa [Ne, map_eq_bot_iff_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R S), ← Ne]
· by_contra h
exact (show Polynomial.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) (minpoly R x) ≠ 0 from
Polynomial.map_monic_ne_zero (minpoly.monic hx')) (span_singleton_eq_bot.mp h)
· refine (normalizedFactorsEquivSpanNormalizedFactors ?_).symm
exact Polynomial.map_monic_ne_zero (minpoly.monic hx')
open Classical in
/-- The second half of the **Kummer-Dedekind Theorem** in the monogenic case, stating that the
| bijection `FactorsEquiv'` defined in the first half preserves multiplicities. -/
theorem emultiplicity_factors_map_eq_emultiplicity
(hI : IsMaximal I) (hI' : I ≠ ⊥)
(hx : (conductor R x).comap (algebraMap R S) ⊔ I = ⊤) (hx' : IsIntegral R x) {J : Ideal S}
(hJ : J ∈ normalizedFactors (I.map (algebraMap R S))) :
emultiplicity J (I.map (algebraMap R S)) =
emultiplicity (↑(normalizedFactorsMapEquivNormalizedFactorsMinPolyMk hI hI' hx hx' ⟨J, hJ⟩))
(Polynomial.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) (minpoly R x)) := by
rw [normalizedFactorsMapEquivNormalizedFactorsMinPolyMk, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/KummerDedekind.lean | 274 | 282 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sebastian Monnet. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Monnet
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.OpenSubgroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
/-!
# Krull topology
We define the Krull topology on `L ≃ₐ[K] L` for an arbitrary field extension `L/K`. In order to do
this, we first define a `GroupFilterBasis` on `L ≃ₐ[K] L`, whose sets are `E.fixingSubgroup` for
all intermediate fields `E` with `E/K` finite dimensional.
## Main Definitions
- `finiteExts K L`. Given a field extension `L/K`, this is the set of intermediate fields that are
finite-dimensional over `K`.
- `fixedByFinite K L`. Given a field extension `L/K`, `fixedByFinite K L` is the set of
subsets `Gal(L/E)` of `Gal(L/K)`, where `E/K` is finite
- `galBasis K L`. Given a field extension `L/K`, this is the filter basis on `L ≃ₐ[K] L` whose
sets are `Gal(L/E)` for intermediate fields `E` with `E/K` finite.
- `galGroupBasis K L`. This is the same as `galBasis K L`, but with the added structure
that it is a group filter basis on `L ≃ₐ[K] L`, rather than just a filter basis.
- `krullTopology K L`. Given a field extension `L/K`, this is the topology on `L ≃ₐ[K] L`, induced
by the group filter basis `galGroupBasis K L`.
## Main Results
- `krullTopology_t2 K L`. For an integral field extension `L/K`, the topology `krullTopology K L`
is Hausdorff.
- `krullTopology_totallyDisconnected K L`. For an integral field extension `L/K`, the topology
`krullTopology K L` is totally disconnected.
- `IntermediateField.finrank_eq_fixingSubgroup_index`: given a Galois extension `K/k` and an
intermediate field `L`, the `[L : k]` as a natural number is equal to the index of the
fixing subgroup of `L`.
## Notations
- In docstrings, we will write `Gal(L/E)` to denote the fixing subgroup of an intermediate field
`E`. That is, `Gal(L/E)` is the subgroup of `L ≃ₐ[K] L` consisting of automorphisms that fix
every element of `E`. In particular, we distinguish between `L ≃ₐ[E] L` and `Gal(L/E)`, since the
former is defined to be a subgroup of `L ≃ₐ[K] L`, while the latter is a group in its own right.
## Implementation Notes
- `krullTopology K L` is defined as an instance for type class inference.
-/
open scoped Pointwise
/-- Mapping intermediate fields along the identity does not change them -/
theorem IntermediateField.map_id {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
(E : IntermediateField K L) : E.map (AlgHom.id K L) = E :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
/-- Mapping a finite dimensional intermediate field along an algebra equivalence gives
a finite-dimensional intermediate field. -/
instance im_finiteDimensional {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
{E : IntermediateField K L} (σ : L ≃ₐ[K] L) [FiniteDimensional K E] :
FiniteDimensional K (E.map σ.toAlgHom) :=
LinearEquiv.finiteDimensional (IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap σ E).toLinearEquiv
/-- Given a field extension `L/K`, `finiteExts K L` is the set of
intermediate field extensions `L/E/K` such that `E/K` is finite -/
def finiteExts (K : Type*) [Field K] (L : Type*) [Field L] [Algebra K L] :
Set (IntermediateField K L) :=
{E | FiniteDimensional K E}
/-- Given a field extension `L/K`, `fixedByFinite K L` is the set of
subsets `Gal(L/E)` of `L ≃ₐ[K] L`, where `E/K` is finite -/
def fixedByFinite (K L : Type*) [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] : Set (Subgroup (L ≃ₐ[K] L)) :=
IntermediateField.fixingSubgroup '' finiteExts K L
/-- For a field extension `L/K`, the intermediate field `K` is finite-dimensional over `K` -/
theorem IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_bot (K L : Type*) [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] :
FiniteDimensional K (⊥ : IntermediateField K L) :=
.of_rank_eq_one IntermediateField.rank_bot
/-- This lemma says that `Gal(L/K) = L ≃ₐ[K] L` -/
theorem IntermediateField.fixingSubgroup.bot {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] :
IntermediateField.fixingSubgroup (⊥ : IntermediateField K L) = ⊤ := by
ext f
| refine ⟨fun _ => Subgroup.mem_top _, fun _ => ?_⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx : x ∈ (⊥ : IntermediateField K L)⟩
rw [IntermediateField.mem_bot] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact f.commutes y
/-- If `L/K` is a field extension, then we have `Gal(L/K) ∈ fixedByFinite K L` -/
theorem top_fixedByFinite {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] :
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/KrullTopology.lean | 93 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Sanyam Gupta, Omar Haddad, David Lowry-Duda,
Lorenzo Luccioli, Pietro Monticone, Alexis Saurin, Florent Schaffhauser
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.FLT.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.PID
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Three
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Lemmas
/-!
# Fermat Last Theorem in the case `n = 3`
The goal of this file is to prove Fermat's Last Theorem in the case `n = 3`.
## Main results
* `fermatLastTheoremThree`: Fermat's Last Theorem for `n = 3`: if `a b c : ℕ` are all non-zero then
`a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3`.
## Implementation details
We follow the proof in <https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~marc.hindry/Cours-arith.pdf>, page 43.
The strategy is the following:
* The so called "Case 1", when `3 ∣ a * b * c` is completely elementary and is proved using
congruences modulo `9`.
* To prove case 2, we consider the generalized equation `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3`, where `a`, `b`,
and `c` are in the cyclotomic ring `ℤ[ζ₃]` (where `ζ₃` is a primitive cube root of unity) and `u`
is a unit of `ℤ[ζ₃]`. `FermatLastTheoremForThree_of_FermatLastTheoremThreeGen` (whose proof is
rather elementary on paper) says that to prove Fermat's last theorem for exponent `3`, it is
enough to prove that this equation has no solutions such that `c ≠ 0`, `¬ λ ∣ a`, `¬ λ ∣ b`,
`λ ∣ c` and `IsCoprime a b` (where we set `λ := ζ₃ - 1`). We call such a tuple a `Solution'`.
A `Solution` is the same as a `Solution'` with the additional assumption that `λ ^ 2 ∣ a + b`.
We then prove that, given `S' : Solution'`, there is `S : Solution` such that the multiplicity of
`λ = ζ₃ - 1` in `c` is the same in `S'` and `S` (see `exists_Solution_of_Solution'`).
In particular it is enough to prove that no `Solution` exists. The key point is a descent argument
on the multiplicity of `λ` in `c`: starting with `S : Solution` we can find `S₁ : Solution` with
multiplicity strictly smaller (see `exists_Solution_multiplicity_lt`) and this finishes the proof.
To construct `S₁` we go through a `Solution'` and then back to a `Solution`. More importantly, we
cannot control the unit `u`, and this is the reason why we need to consider the generalized
equation `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3`. The construction is completely explicit, but it depends
crucially on `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three.eq_one_or_neg_one_of_unit_of_congruent`, a special
case of Kummer's lemma.
* Note that we don't prove Case 1 for the generalized equation (in particular we don't prove that
the generalized equation has no nontrivial solutions). This is because the proof, even if
elementary on paper, would be quite annoying to formalize: indeed it involves a lot of explicit
computations in `ℤ[ζ₃] / (λ)`: this ring is isomorphic to `ℤ / 9ℤ`, but of course, even if we
construct such an isomorphism, tactics like `decide` would not work.
-/
section case1
open ZMod
private lemma cube_of_castHom_ne_zero {n : ZMod 9} :
castHom (show 3 ∣ 9 by norm_num) (ZMod 3) n ≠ 0 → n ^ 3 = 1 ∨ n ^ 3 = 8 := by
revert n; decide
private lemma cube_of_not_dvd {n : ℤ} (h : ¬ 3 ∣ n) :
(n : ZMod 9) ^ 3 = 1 ∨ (n : ZMod 9) ^ 3 = 8 := by
apply cube_of_castHom_ne_zero
rwa [map_intCast, Ne, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
/-- If `a b c : ℤ` are such that `¬ 3 ∣ a * b * c`, then `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3`. -/
theorem fermatLastTheoremThree_case_1 {a b c : ℤ} (hdvd : ¬ 3 ∣ a * b * c) :
a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3 := by
simp_rw [Int.prime_three.dvd_mul, not_or] at hdvd
apply mt (congrArg (Int.cast : ℤ → ZMod 9))
simp_rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_pow]
rcases cube_of_not_dvd hdvd.1.1 with ha | ha <;>
rcases cube_of_not_dvd hdvd.1.2 with hb | hb <;>
rcases cube_of_not_dvd hdvd.2 with hc | hc <;>
rw [ha, hb, hc] <;> decide
end case1
section case2
private lemma three_dvd_b_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 {a b c : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(Hgcd : Finset.gcd {a, b, c} id = 1) (h3a : 3 ∣ a) (HF : a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 + c ^ 3 = 0)
(H : ∀ a b c : ℤ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ 3 ∣ a → ¬ 3 ∣ b → 3 ∣ c → IsCoprime a b → a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3) :
3 ∣ b := by
have hbc : IsCoprime (-b) (-c) := by
refine IsCoprime.neg_neg ?_
rw [add_comm (a ^ 3), add_assoc, add_comm (a ^ 3), ← add_assoc] at HF
refine isCoprime_of_gcd_eq_one_of_FLT ?_ HF
convert Hgcd using 2
rw [Finset.pair_comm, Finset.insert_comm]
by_contra! h3b
by_cases h3c : 3 ∣ c
· apply h3b
rw [add_assoc, add_comm (b ^ 3), ← add_assoc] at HF
exact dvd_c_of_prime_of_dvd_a_of_dvd_b_of_FLT Int.prime_three h3a h3c HF
· refine H (-b) (-c) a ha (by simp [h3b]) (by simp [h3c]) h3a hbc ?_
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← (show Odd 3 by decide).neg_pow] at HF
rw [← HF]
ring
open Finset in
private lemma fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 {a b c : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h3a : 3 ∣ a) (Hgcd : Finset.gcd {a, b, c} id = 1)
(H : ∀ a b c : ℤ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ 3 ∣ a → ¬ 3 ∣ b → 3 ∣ c → IsCoprime a b → a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3) :
a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 + c ^ 3 ≠ 0 := by
intro HF
apply (show ¬(3 ∣ (1 : ℤ)) by decide)
rw [← Hgcd]
refine dvd_gcd (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_insert, mem_singleton] at hx
have h3b : 3 ∣ b := by
refine three_dvd_b_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 ha ?_ h3a HF H
simp only [← Hgcd, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← Int.abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
rcases hx with hx | hx | hx
· exact hx ▸ h3a
· exact hx ▸ h3b
· simpa [hx] using dvd_c_of_prime_of_dvd_a_of_dvd_b_of_FLT Int.prime_three h3a h3b HF
open Finset Int in
/--
To prove Fermat's Last Theorem for `n = 3`, it is enough to show that for all `a`, `b`, `c`
in `ℤ` such that `c ≠ 0`, `¬ 3 ∣ a`, `¬ 3 ∣ b`, `a` and `b` are coprime and `3 ∣ c`, we have
`a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3`.
-/
theorem fermatLastTheoremThree_of_three_dvd_only_c
(H : ∀ a b c : ℤ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ 3 ∣ a → ¬ 3 ∣ b → 3 ∣ c → IsCoprime a b → a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ c ^ 3) :
FermatLastTheoremFor 3 := by
rw [fermatLastTheoremFor_iff_int]
refine fermatLastTheoremWith_of_fermatLastTheoremWith_coprime (fun a b c ha hb hc Hgcd hF ↦?_)
by_cases h1 : 3 ∣ a * b * c
swap
· exact fermatLastTheoremThree_case_1 h1 hF
rw [(prime_three).dvd_mul, (prime_three).dvd_mul] at h1
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, ← (show Odd 3 by decide).neg_pow] at hF
rcases h1 with (h3a | h3b) | h3c
· refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 ha h3a ?_ H hF
simp only [← Hgcd, insert_comm, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
· rw [add_comm (a ^ 3)] at hF
refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 hb h3b ?_ H hF
simp only [← Hgcd, insert_comm, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
· rw [add_comm _ ((-c) ^ 3), ← add_assoc] at hF
refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_dvd_a_of_gcd_eq_one_of_case2 (neg_ne_zero.2 hc) (by simp [h3c])
?_ H hF
rw [Finset.insert_comm (-c), Finset.pair_comm (-c) b]
simp only [← Hgcd, insert_comm, gcd_insert, gcd_singleton, id_eq, ← abs_eq_normalize, abs_neg]
section eisenstein
open NumberField IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.Three
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable {ζ : K} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (3 : ℕ+))
local notation3 "η" => (IsPrimitiveRoot.isUnit (hζ.toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot) (by decide)).unit
local notation3 "λ" => hζ.toInteger - 1
/-- `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen` is the statement that `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3` has no
nontrivial solutions in `𝓞 K` for all `u : (𝓞 K)ˣ` such that `¬ λ ∣ a`, `¬ λ ∣ b` and `λ ∣ c`.
The reason to consider `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen` is to make a descent argument working. -/
def FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen : Prop :=
∀ a b c : 𝓞 K, ∀ u : (𝓞 K)ˣ, c ≠ 0 → ¬ λ ∣ a → ¬ λ ∣ b → λ ∣ c → IsCoprime a b →
a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 ≠ u * c ^ 3
/-- To prove `FermatLastTheoremFor 3`, it is enough to prove `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen`. -/
lemma FermatLastTheoremForThree_of_FermatLastTheoremThreeGen
[NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] :
FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen hζ → FermatLastTheoremFor 3 := by
intro H
refine fermatLastTheoremThree_of_three_dvd_only_c (fun a b c hc ha hb ⟨x, hx⟩ hcoprime h ↦ ?_)
refine H a b c 1 (by simp [hc]) (fun hdvd ↦ ha ?_) (fun hdvd ↦ hb ?_) ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [← Ideal.norm_dvd_iff (hζ.prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)),
hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)] at hdvd
· rwa [← Ideal.norm_dvd_iff (hζ.prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)),
hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' (by decide)] at hdvd
· exact dvd_trans hζ.toInteger_sub_one_dvd_prime' ⟨x, by simp [hx]⟩
· rw [show a = algebraMap _ (𝓞 K) a by simp, show b = algebraMap _ (𝓞 K) b by simp]
exact hcoprime.map _
· simp only [Units.val_one, one_mul]
exact_mod_cast h
namespace FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen
/-- `Solution'` is a tuple given by a solution to `a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3`,
where `a`, `b`, `c` and `u` are as in `FermatLastTheoremForThreeGen`.
See `Solution` for the actual structure on which we will do the descent. -/
structure Solution' where
a : 𝓞 K
b : 𝓞 K
c : 𝓞 K
u : (𝓞 K)ˣ
ha : ¬ λ ∣ a
hb : ¬ λ ∣ b
hc : c ≠ 0
coprime : IsCoprime a b
hcdvd : λ ∣ c
H : a ^ 3 + b ^ 3 = u * c ^ 3
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.a
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.b
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.c
attribute [nolint docBlame] Solution'.u
/-- `Solution` is the same as `Solution'` with the additional assumption that `λ ^ 2 ∣ a + b`. -/
structure Solution extends Solution' hζ where
hab : λ ^ 2 ∣ a + b
variable {hζ}
variable (S : Solution hζ) (S' : Solution' hζ)
section IsCyclotomicExtension
variable [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K]
/-- For any `S' : Solution'`, the multiplicity of `λ` in `S'.c` is finite. -/
lemma Solution'.multiplicity_lambda_c_finite :
FiniteMultiplicity (hζ.toInteger - 1) S'.c :=
.of_not_isUnit hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime'.not_unit S'.hc
/-- Given `S' : Solution'`, `S'.multiplicity` is the multiplicity of `λ` in `S'.c`, as a natural
number. -/
noncomputable def Solution'.multiplicity :=
_root_.multiplicity (hζ.toInteger - 1) S'.c
/-- Given `S : Solution`, `S.multiplicity` is the multiplicity of `λ` in `S.c`, as a natural
number. -/
noncomputable def Solution.multiplicity := S.toSolution'.multiplicity
/-- We say that `S : Solution` is minimal if for all `S₁ : Solution`, the multiplicity of `λ` in
`S.c` is less or equal than the multiplicity in `S₁.c`. -/
def Solution.isMinimal : Prop := ∀ (S₁ : Solution hζ), S.multiplicity ≤ S₁.multiplicity
omit [NumberField K] [IsCyclotomicExtension {3} ℚ K] in
include S in
/-- If there is a solution then there is a minimal one. -/
lemma Solution.exists_minimal : ∃ (S₁ : Solution hζ), S₁.isMinimal := by
classical
let T := {n | ∃ (S' : Solution hζ), S'.multiplicity = n}
rcases Nat.find_spec (⟨S.multiplicity, ⟨S, rfl⟩⟩ : T.Nonempty) with ⟨S₁, hS₁⟩
exact ⟨S₁, fun S'' ↦ hS₁ ▸ Nat.find_min' _ ⟨S'', rfl⟩⟩
/-- Given `S' : Solution'`, then `S'.a` and `S'.b` are both congruent to `1` modulo `λ ^ 4` or are
both congruent to `-1`. -/
lemma a_cube_b_cube_congr_one_or_neg_one :
λ ^ 4 ∣ S'.a ^ 3 - 1 ∧ λ ^ 4 ∣ S'.b ^ 3 + 1 ∨ λ ^ 4 ∣ S'.a ^ 3 + 1 ∧ λ ^ 4 ∣ S'.b ^ 3 - 1 := by
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := S'.hcdvd
rcases lambda_pow_four_dvd_cube_sub_one_or_add_one_of_lambda_not_dvd hζ S'.ha with
⟨x, hx⟩ | ⟨x, hx⟩ <;>
rcases lambda_pow_four_dvd_cube_sub_one_or_add_one_of_lambda_not_dvd hζ S'.hb with
⟨y, hy⟩ | ⟨y, hy⟩
· exfalso
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ((3 : ℕ+) ^ 1) := by rwa [pow_one]
refine hζ.toInteger_sub_one_not_dvd_two (by decide) ⟨S'.u * λ ^ 2 * z ^ 3 - λ ^ 3 * (x + y), ?_⟩
symm
calc _ = S'.u * (λ * z) ^ 3 - λ ^ 4 * x - λ ^ 4 * y := by ring
_ = (S'.a ^ 3 + S'.b ^ 3) - (S'.a ^ 3 - 1) - (S'.b ^ 3 - 1) := by rw [← hx, ← hy, ← hz, ← S'.H]
_ = 2 := by ring
· left
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
· right
| exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩⟩
· exfalso
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ((3 : ℕ+) ^ 1) := by rwa [pow_one]
refine hζ.toInteger_sub_one_not_dvd_two (by decide) ⟨λ ^ 3 * (x + y) - S'.u * λ ^ 2 * z ^ 3, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Three.lean | 257 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 1,799 | 1,802 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff₀ hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
/-- Gauge is subadditive. -/
theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by
refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha', x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s x) (half_pos hε))
obtain ⟨b, hb, hb', y, hy, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s y) (half_pos hε))
calc
gauge s (a • x + b • y) ≤ a + b := gauge_le_of_mem (by positivity) <| by
rw [hs.add_smul ha.le hb.le]
exact add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
_ < gauge s (a • x) + gauge s (b • y) + ε := by linarith
theorem self_subset_gauge_le_one : s ⊆ { x | gauge s x ≤ 1 } := fun _ => gauge_le_one_of_mem
theorem Convex.gauge_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
Convex ℝ { x | gauge s x ≤ a } := by
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a
· rw [gauge_le_eq hs h₀ absorbs ha]
exact convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter fun _ => hs.smul _
· convert convex_empty (𝕜 := ℝ)
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => ha <| (gauge_nonneg _).trans hx
theorem Balanced.starConvex (hs : Balanced ℝ s) : StarConvex ℝ 0 s :=
starConvex_zero_iff.2 fun _ hx a ha₀ ha₁ =>
hs _ (by rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg ha₀]) (smul_mem_smul_set hx)
theorem le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₀ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ a • s) :
a ≤ gauge s x := by
rw [starConvex_zero_iff] at hs₀
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := hs₂.exists_pos
refine le_csInf ⟨r, hr, singleton_subset_iff.1 <| h _ (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le).ge⟩ ?_
rintro b ⟨hb, x, hx', rfl⟩
refine not_lt.1 fun hba => hx ?_
have ha := hb.trans hba
refine ⟨(a⁻¹ * b) • x, hs₀ hx' (by positivity) ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ hba.le ha.le
· dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ ha.ne']
theorem one_le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₁ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ s) :
1 ≤ gauge s x :=
le_gauge_of_not_mem hs₁ hs₂ <| by rwa [one_smul]
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
[MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ]
theorem gauge_smul_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [IsScalarTower α ℝ (Set E)] {s : Set E} {a : α}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (x : E) : gauge s (a • x) = a • gauge s x := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul, gauge_zero, zero_smul]
rw [gauge_def', gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg ha]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr
refine ⟨a⁻¹ • r, ⟨this, ?_⟩, smul_inv_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc,
mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (inv_ne_zero ha'.ne'), inv_inv]
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos ha' hr
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc]
exact smul_mem_smul_set hx
theorem gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
gauge (a • s) = a⁻¹ • gauge s := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [inv_zero, zero_smul, gauge_of_subset_zero (zero_smul_set_subset _)]
ext x
rw [gauge_def', Pi.smul_apply, gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 ha)]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, y, hy, h⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨a • r, ⟨smul_pos ha' hr, ?_⟩, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, ← h, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne']
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr, r⁻¹ • x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, inv_inv]
theorem gauge_smul_left [Module α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (a : α) :
gauge (a • s) = |a|⁻¹ • gauge s := by
rw [← gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg a)]
obtain h | h := abs_choice a
· rw [h]
· rw [h, Set.neg_smul_set, ← Set.smul_set_neg]
-- Porting note: was congr
apply congr_arg
apply congr_arg
ext y
refine ⟨symmetric _, fun hy => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_neg y]
exact symmetric _ hy
end LinearOrderedField
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem gauge_norm_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) :
gauge s (‖r‖ • x) = gauge s (r • x) := by
unfold gauge
congr with θ
rw [@RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul 𝕜]
refine and_congr_right fun hθ => (hs.smul _).smul_mem_iff ?_
rw [RCLike.norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
/-- If `s` is balanced, then the Minkowski functional is ℂ-homogeneous. -/
theorem gauge_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) : gauge s (r • x) = ‖r‖ * gauge s x := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← gauge_smul_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg r), gauge_norm_smul hs]
end RCLike
open Filter
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le (ha : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) ≤ 𝓝 0 := fun u hu ↦ by
rcases (hb hu).exists_pos with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap (gt_mem_nhds (inv_pos.2 hr₀))] with x (hx : gauge s x < r⁻¹)
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt ha hx with ⟨c, hc₀, hcr, y, hy, rfl⟩
have hrc := (lt_inv_comm₀ hr₀ hc₀).2 hcr
rcases hr c⁻¹ (hrc.le.trans (le_abs_self _)) hy with ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
simpa only [smul_inv_smul₀ hc₀.ne']
variable [T1Space E]
theorem gauge_eq_zero (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
gauge s x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h₀ ↦ by_contra fun (hne : x ≠ 0) ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ gauge_zero⟩
have : {x}ᶜ ∈ comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) :=
comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le hs hb (isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hne.symm)
rcases ((nhds_basis_zero_abs_lt _).comap _).mem_iff.1 this with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
exact hr (by simpa [h₀]) rfl
theorem gauge_pos (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
0 < gauge s x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simp only [(gauge_nonneg _).gt_iff_ne, Ne, gauge_eq_zero hs hb]
end TopologicalSpace
section ContinuousSMul
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E]
open Filter in
theorem interior_subset_gauge_lt_one (s : Set E) : interior s ⊆ { x | gauge s x < 1 } := by
intro x hx
have H₁ : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ ↦ r⁻¹ • x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 ((1 : ℝ)⁻¹ • x)) :=
((tendsto_id.inv₀ one_ne_zero).smul tendsto_const_nhds).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [inv_one, one_smul] at H₁
have H₂ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[<] (1 : ℝ), x ∈ r • s ∧ 0 < r ∧ r < 1 := by
filter_upwards [H₁ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hx), Ioo_mem_nhdsLT one_pos] with r h₁ h₂
exact ⟨(mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ h₂.1.ne' _ _).2 h₁, h₂⟩
rcases H₂.exists with ⟨r, hxr, hr₀, hr₁⟩
exact (gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hxr).trans_lt hr₁
theorem gauge_lt_one_eq_self_of_isOpen (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } = s := by
refine (gauge_lt_one_subset_self hs₁ ‹_› <| absorbent_nhds_zero <| hs₂.mem_nhds hs₀).antisymm ?_
convert interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s
exact hs₂.interior_eq.symm
theorem gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen (hs₂ : IsOpen s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) :
gauge s x < 1 :=
interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s <| by rwa [hs₂.interior_eq]
theorem gauge_lt_of_mem_smul (x : E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ ε • s) :
gauge s x < ε := by
have : ε⁻¹ • x ∈ s := by rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hε.ne']
have h_gauge_lt := gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen hs₂ this
rwa [gauge_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hε.le), smul_eq_mul, inv_mul_lt_iff₀ hε, mul_one]
at h_gauge_lt
theorem mem_closure_of_gauge_le_one (hc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : 0 ∈ s) (ha : Absorbent ℝ s)
(h : gauge s x ≤ 1) : x ∈ closure s := by
have : ∀ᶠ r : ℝ in 𝓝[<] 1, r • x ∈ s := by
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsLT one_pos] with r ⟨hr₀, hr₁⟩
apply gauge_lt_one_subset_self hc hs₀ ha
rw [mem_setOf_eq, gauge_smul_of_nonneg hr₀]
exact mul_lt_one_of_nonneg_of_lt_one_left hr₀ hr₁ h
refine mem_closure_of_tendsto ?_ this
exact Filter.Tendsto.mono_left (Continuous.tendsto' (by fun_prop) _ _ (one_smul _ _))
inf_le_left
theorem mem_frontier_of_gauge_eq_one (hc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : 0 ∈ s) (ha : Absorbent ℝ s)
(h : gauge s x = 1) : x ∈ frontier s :=
⟨mem_closure_of_gauge_le_one hc hs₀ ha h.le, fun h' ↦
(interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s h').out.ne h⟩
theorem tendsto_gauge_nhds_zero_nhdsGE (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 0) : Tendsto (gauge s) (𝓝 0) (𝓝[≥] 0) := by
refine nhdsGE_basis_Icc.tendsto_right_iff.2 fun ε hε ↦ ?_
| rw [← set_smul_mem_nhds_zero_iff hε.ne'] at hs
filter_upwards [hs] with x hx
exact ⟨gauge_nonneg _, gauge_le_of_mem hε.le hx⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 390 | 394 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
open Classical in
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hf, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_right_inj₀]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
have hfg := mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg
simp only [hfg, hf, hg, dite_false]
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _ |>.not
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q := by
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· simp [norm]
· simp [norm, not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq]
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hfg _ hpn
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases lt_or_le (padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg))) (padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
| inl hlt =>
exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
| inr hle =>
apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hle h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
exact if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
| theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 369 | 374 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.ExteriorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Defs
/-!
# Contraction in Clifford Algebras
This file contains some of the results from [grinberg_clifford_2016][].
The key result is `CliffordAlgebra.equivExterior`.
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft`: contract a multivector by a `Module.Dual R M` on the left.
* `CliffordAlgebra.contractRight`: contract a multivector by a `Module.Dual R M` on the right.
* `CliffordAlgebra.changeForm`: convert between two algebras of different quadratic form, sending
vectors to vectors. The difference of the quadratic forms must be a bilinear form.
* `CliffordAlgebra.equivExterior`: in characteristic not-two, the `CliffordAlgebra Q` is
isomorphic as a module to the exterior algebra.
## Implementation notes
This file somewhat follows [grinberg_clifford_2016][], although we are missing some of the induction
principles needed to prove many of the results. Here, we avoid the quotient-based approach described
in [grinberg_clifford_2016][], instead directly constructing our objects using the universal
property.
Note that [grinberg_clifford_2016][] concludes that its contents are not novel, and are in fact just
a rehash of parts of [bourbaki2007][]; we should at some point consider swapping our references to
refer to the latter.
Within this file, we use the local notation
* `x ⌊ d` for `contractRight x d`
* `d ⌋ x` for `contractLeft d x`
-/
open LinearMap (BilinMap BilinForm)
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R : Type u1} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type u2} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section contractLeft
variable (d d' : Module.Dual R M)
/-- Auxiliary construction for `CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft` -/
@[simps!]
def contractLeftAux (d : Module.Dual R M) :
M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q × CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
haveI v_mul := (Algebra.lmul R (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q
d.smulRight (LinearMap.fst _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) (CliffordAlgebra Q)) -
v_mul.compl₂ (LinearMap.snd _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) _)
theorem contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux (v : M) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (fx : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractLeftAux Q d v (ι Q v * x, contractLeftAux Q d v (x, fx)) = Q v • fx := by
simp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← sub_add, mul_smul_comm, sub_self,
zero_add]
variable {Q}
/-- Contract an element of the clifford algebra with an element `d : Module.Dual R M` from the left.
Note that $v ⌋ x$ is spelt `contractLeft (Q.associated v) x`.
This includes [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 10.75 -/
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q where
toFun d := foldr' Q (contractLeftAux Q d) (contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d) 0
map_add' d₁ d₂ :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
rw [LinearMap.add_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with
| algebraMap => simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero, zero_add]
| add _ _ hx hy => rw [map_add, map_add, map_add, add_add_add_comm, hx, hy]
| ι_mul _ _ hx =>
rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [sub_add_sub_comm, mul_add, LinearMap.add_apply, add_smul]
map_smul' c d :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with
| algebraMap => simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero]
| add _ _ hx hy => rw [map_add, map_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
| ι_mul _ _ hx =>
rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_assoc, mul_smul_comm, smul_sub]
/-- Contract an element of the clifford algebra with an element `d : Module.Dual R M` from the
right.
Note that $x ⌊ v$ is spelt `contractRight x (Q.associated v)`.
This includes [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 16.75 -/
def contractRight : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearMap.flip (LinearMap.compl₂ (LinearMap.compr₂ contractLeft reverse) reverse)
theorem contractRight_eq (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractRight (Q := Q) x d = reverse (contractLeft (R := R) (M := M) d <| reverse x) :=
rfl
local infixl:70 "⌋" => contractLeft (R := R) (M := M)
local infixl:70 "⌊" => contractRight (R := R) (M := M) (Q := Q)
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 6 -/
theorem contractLeft_ι_mul (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(ι Q a * b) = d a • b - ι Q a * (d⌋b) := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine foldr'_ι_mul _ _ ?_ _ _ _
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 12 -/
theorem contractRight_mul_ι (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
b * ι Q a⌊d = d a • b - b⌊d * ι Q a := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractLeft_ι_mul, map_sub, map_smul,
reverse_reverse, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractRight_eq]
theorem contractLeft_algebraMap_mul (r : R) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(algebraMap _ _ r * b) = algebraMap _ _ r * (d⌋b) := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, map_smul, Algebra.smul_def]
theorem contractLeft_mul_algebraMap (a : CliffordAlgebra Q) (r : R) :
d⌋(a * algebraMap _ _ r) = d⌋a * algebraMap _ _ r := by
rw [← Algebra.commutes, contractLeft_algebraMap_mul, Algebra.commutes]
theorem contractRight_algebraMap_mul (r : R) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
algebraMap _ _ r * b⌊d = algebraMap _ _ r * (b⌊d) := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, LinearMap.map_smul₂, Algebra.smul_def]
theorem contractRight_mul_algebraMap (a : CliffordAlgebra Q) (r : R) :
a * algebraMap _ _ r⌊d = a⌊d * algebraMap _ _ r := by
rw [← Algebra.commutes, contractRight_algebraMap_mul, Algebra.commutes]
variable (Q)
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_ι (x : M) : d⌋ι Q x = algebraMap R _ (d x) := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine (foldr'_ι _ _ ?_ _ _).trans <| by
simp_rw [contractLeftAux_apply_apply, mul_zero, sub_zero,
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_ι (x : M) : ι Q x⌊d = algebraMap R _ (d x) := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse_ι, contractLeft_ι, reverse.commutes]
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_algebraMap (r : R) : d⌋algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r = 0 := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine (foldr'_algebraMap _ _ ?_ _ _).trans <| smul_zero _
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_algebraMap (r : R) : algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r⌊d = 0 := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse.commutes, contractLeft_algebraMap, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_one : d⌋(1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 0 := by
simpa only [map_one] using contractLeft_algebraMap Q d 1
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_one : (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q)⌊d = 0 := by
simpa only [map_one] using contractRight_algebraMap Q d 1
variable {Q}
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 7 -/
theorem contractLeft_contractLeft (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : d⌋(d⌋x) = 0 := by
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with
| algebraMap => simp_rw [contractLeft_algebraMap, map_zero]
| add _ _ hx hy => rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy, add_zero]
| ι_mul _ _ hx =>
rw [contractLeft_ι_mul, map_sub, contractLeft_ι_mul, hx, LinearMap.map_smul,
mul_zero, sub_zero, sub_self]
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 13 -/
theorem contractRight_contractRight (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : x⌊d⌊d = 0 := by
rw [contractRight_eq, contractRight_eq, reverse_reverse, contractLeft_contractLeft, map_zero]
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 8 -/
theorem contractLeft_comm (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : d⌋(d'⌋x) = -(d'⌋(d⌋x)) := by
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with
| algebraMap => simp_rw [contractLeft_algebraMap, map_zero, neg_zero]
| add _ _ hx hy => rw [map_add, map_add, map_add, map_add, hx, hy, neg_add]
| ι_mul _ _ hx =>
simp only [contractLeft_ι_mul, map_sub, LinearMap.map_smul]
rw [neg_sub, sub_sub_eq_add_sub, hx, mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 14 -/
theorem contractRight_comm (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : x⌊d⌊d' = -(x⌊d'⌊d) := by
| rw [contractRight_eq, contractRight_eq, contractRight_eq, contractRight_eq, reverse_reverse,
reverse_reverse, contractLeft_comm, map_neg]
/- TODO:
lemma contractRight_contractLeft (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (d ⌋ x) ⌊ d' = d ⌋ (x ⌊ d') :=
-/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 205 | 210 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.StarAlgHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Center
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
/-!
# Non-unital Star Subalgebras
In this file we define `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them
(`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
namespace StarMemClass
/-- If a type carries an involutive star, then any star-closed subset does too. -/
instance instInvolutiveStar {S R : Type*} [InvolutiveStar R] [SetLike S R] [StarMemClass S R]
(s : S) : InvolutiveStar s where
star_involutive r := Subtype.ext <| star_star (r : R)
/-- In a star magma (i.e., a multiplication with an antimultiplicative involutive star
operation), any star-closed subset which is also closed under multiplication is itself a star
magma. -/
instance instStarMul {S R : Type*} [Mul R] [StarMul R] [SetLike S R]
[MulMemClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarMul s where
star_mul _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_mul _ _
/-- In a `StarAddMonoid` (i.e., an additive monoid with an additive involutive star operation), any
star-closed subset which is also closed under addition and contains zero is itself a
`StarAddMonoid`. -/
instance instStarAddMonoid {S R : Type*} [AddMonoid R] [StarAddMonoid R] [SetLike S R]
[AddSubmonoidClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarAddMonoid s where
star_add _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_add _ _
/-- In a star ring (i.e., a non-unital, non-associative, semiring with an additive,
antimultiplicative, involutive star operation), a star-closed non-unital subsemiring is itself a
star ring. -/
instance instStarRing {S R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [StarRing R] [SetLike S R]
[NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] [StarMemClass S R] (s : S) : StarRing s :=
{ StarMemClass.instStarMul s, StarMemClass.instStarAddMonoid s with }
/-- In a star `R`-module (i.e., `star (r • m) = (star r) • m`) any star-closed subset which is also
closed under the scalar action by `R` is itself a star `R`-module. -/
instance instStarModule {S : Type*} (R : Type*) {M : Type*} [Star R] [Star M] [SMul R M]
[StarModule R M] [SetLike S M] [SMulMemClass S R M] [StarMemClass S M] (s : S) :
StarModule R s where
star_smul _ _ := Subtype.ext <| star_smul _ _
end StarMemClass
universe u u' v v' w w' w''
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u}
variable {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
variable [Star A] [Module R A]
variable {S : Type w''} [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A]
variable [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] [StarMemClass S A] (s : S)
/-- Embedding of a non-unital star subalgebra into the non-unital star algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →⋆ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype s with
toFun := Subtype.val
map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital star subalgebra is a non-unital subalgebra which is closed under the `star`
operation. -/
structure NonUnitalStarSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
/-- The `carrier` of a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` is closed under the `star` operation. -/
star_mem' : ∀ {a : A} (_ha : a ∈ carrier), star a ∈ carrier
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubalgebra`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
instance instSetLike : SetLike (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
coe {s} := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass`, `SMulMemClass` and `StarMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A] [StarMemClass S A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
star_mem' := star_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
(∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) ∧ ∀ {x}, x ∈ s → star x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2.1
star_mem' := h.2.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem {s} := s.smul_mem'
instance instStarMemClass : StarMemClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A where
star_mem {s} := s.star_mem'
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := fun _S {x} hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubalgebra : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_inj {S U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = U.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S₁.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Copy of a non-unital star subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.copy s hs with
star_mem' := @fun x (hx : x ∈ s) => by
show star x ∈ s
rw [hs] at hx ⊢
exact S.star_mem' hx }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
variable (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A)
/-- A non-unital star subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubring A where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
neg_mem' := neg_mem (s := S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {x} : x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toNonUnitalSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_injective {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] :
Function.Injective (toNonUnitalSubring : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubring A) :=
fun S T h => ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_inj {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
[Star A] {S U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubring = U.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff
instance instInhabited : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra)⟩
section
/-! `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and
`NonUnitalSubringClass` instances. -/
instance toNonUnitalSemiring {R A} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring {R A} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring A] [Module R A]
[Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalRing {R A} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommRing {R A} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommRing S :=
inferInstance
end
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra' : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
section
/-! `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Submodule` coercions. -/
instance module' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] : Module R' S :=
SMulMemClass.toModule' _ R' R A S
instance instModule : Module R S :=
S.module'
instance instIsScalarTower' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] :
IsScalarTower R' R S :=
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.instIsScalarTower'
instance instIsScalarTower [IsScalarTower R A A] : IsScalarTower R S S where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : A) (y : A)
instance instSMulCommClass' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A]
[SMulCommClass R' R A] : SMulCommClass R' R S where
smul_comm r' r s := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r' r (s : A)
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R A A] : SMulCommClass R S S where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : A) (y : A)
end
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_bot [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R S :=
⟨fun {c x} h =>
have : c = 0 ∨ (x : A) = 0 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (congr_arg ((↑) : S → A) h)
this.imp_right (@Subtype.ext_iff _ _ x 0).mpr⟩
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : A) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : A) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : A) = 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (x : S) : (↑(-x) : A) = -↑x :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A]
[Module R A] [Star A] {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} (x y : S) : (↑(x - y) : A) = ↑x - ↑y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMul R' R] [SMul R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] (r : R') (x : S) :
↑(r • x) = r • (x : A) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_eq_zero {x : S} : (x : A) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_subtype :
NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype S = NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_subtype {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] [Star A]
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
NonUnitalSubringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype S :=
rfl
/-- Transport a non-unital star subalgebra via a non-unital star algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.map (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B)
star_mem' := by rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact ⟨star a, star_mem (s := S) ha, map_star f a⟩
theorem map_mono {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → (map f S₁ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) ≤ map f S₂ :=
Set.image_subset f
theorem map_injective {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) :=
fun _S₁ _S₂ ih =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 <| Set.image_injective.2 hf <| Set.ext <| SetLike.ext_iff.mp ih
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : map (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id R A) S = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {y : B} :
y ∈ map f S ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_map
theorem map_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
(map f S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B).toNonUnitalSubalgebra =
NonUnitalSubalgebra.map f S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (f : F) : map f S = f '' S :=
rfl
/-- Preimage of a non-unital star subalgebra under a non-unital star algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.comap f
star_mem' := @fun a (ha : f a ∈ S) =>
show f (star a) ∈ S from (map_star f a).symm ▸ star_mem (s := S) ha
theorem map_le {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {U : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B} :
map f S ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap f U :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) :=
fun _S _U => map_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (f : F) (x : A) : x ∈ comap f S ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comap (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (f : F) : comap f S = f ⁻¹' (S : Set B) :=
rfl
instance instNoZeroDivisors {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
[Module R A] [Star A] (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : NoZeroDivisors S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors S
end NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A)
/-- A non-unital subalgebra closed under `star` is a non-unital star subalgebra. -/
def toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra (h_star : ∀ x, x ∈ s → star x ∈ s) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A :=
{ s with
star_mem' := @h_star }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {h_star} {x} :
x ∈ s.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra h_star ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (h_star) :
(s.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra h_star : Set A) = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (h_star) :
(s.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra h_star).toNonUnitalSubalgebra = s :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra_toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra
(S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
(S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra fun _ => star_mem (s := S)) = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHom
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
/-- Range of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` as a `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra`. -/
protected def range (φ : F) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := NonUnitalAlgHom.range (φ : A →ₙₐ[R] B)
star_mem' := by rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨star a, map_star φ a⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (φ : F) {y : B} :
y ∈ (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) ↔ ∃ x : A, φ x = y :=
NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem mem_range_self (φ : F) (x : A) :
φ x ∈ (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) :=
(NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range φ).2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (φ : F) :
((NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) : Set B) = Set.range (φ : A → B) :=
by ext; rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_range]; rfl
theorem range_comp (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range (g.comp f) = (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range (g.comp f) ≤ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital star algebra homomorphism. -/
def codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] S where
toNonUnitalAlgHom := NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra hf
map_star' := fun a => Subtype.ext <| map_star f a
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
(NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype S).comp (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) = f :=
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) (x : A) :
↑(NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem injective_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
Function.Injective (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun H _x _y hxy => H <| Subtype.eq hxy, fun H _x _y hxy => H (congr_arg Subtype.val hxy :)⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital star algebra homomorphism `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict (f : F) :
A →⋆ₙₐ[R] (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R B) :=
NonUnitalStarAlgHom.codRestrict f (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f)
(NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mem_range_self f)
/-- The equalizer of two non-unital star `R`-algebra homomorphisms -/
def equalizer (ϕ ψ : F) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := NonUnitalAlgHom.equalizer ϕ ψ
star_mem' := @fun x (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) => by simp [map_star, hx]
@[simp]
theorem mem_equalizer (φ ψ : F) (x : A) :
x ∈ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.equalizer φ ψ ↔ φ x = ψ x :=
Iff.rfl
end NonUnitalStarAlgHom
namespace StarAlgEquiv
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring C] [Module R C] [Star C]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
/-- Restrict a non-unital star algebra homomorphism with a left inverse to an algebra isomorphism
to its range.
This is a computable alternative to `StarAlgEquiv.ofInjective`. -/
def ofLeftInverse' {g : B → A} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
A ≃⋆ₐ[R] NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f :=
{ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.rangeRestrict f with
toFun := NonUnitalStarAlgHom.rangeRestrict f
invFun := g ∘ (NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype <| NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f)
left_inv := h
right_inv := fun x =>
Subtype.ext <|
let ⟨x', hx'⟩ := (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.mem_range f).mp x.prop
show f (g x) = x by rw [← hx', h x'] }
@[simp]
theorem ofLeftInverse'_apply {g : B → A} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) (x : A) :
ofLeftInverse' h x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLeftInverse'_symm_apply {g : B → A} {f : F} (h : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(x : NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f) : (ofLeftInverse' h).symm x = g x :=
rfl
/-- Restrict an injective non-unital star algebra homomorphism to a star algebra isomorphism -/
noncomputable def ofInjective' (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
A ≃⋆ₐ[R] NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f :=
ofLeftInverse' (Classical.choose_spec hf.hasLeftInverse)
@[simp]
theorem ofInjective'_apply (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : A) :
ofInjective' f hf x = f x :=
rfl
end StarAlgEquiv
/-! ### The star closure of a subalgebra -/
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
open scoped Pointwise
variable [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [StarRing A] [Module R A]
variable [StarModule R A]
/-- The pointwise `star` of a non-unital subalgebra is a non-unital subalgebra. -/
instance instInvolutiveStar : InvolutiveStar (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) where
star S :=
{ carrier := star S.carrier
mul_mem' := @fun x y hx hy => by simpa only [Set.mem_star, NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier]
using (star_mul x y).symm ▸ mul_mem hy hx
add_mem' := @fun x y hx hy => by simpa only [Set.mem_star, NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier]
using (star_add x y).symm ▸ add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := Set.mem_star.mp ((star_zero A).symm ▸ zero_mem S : star (0 : A) ∈ S)
smul_mem' := fun r x hx => by simpa only [Set.mem_star, NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier]
using (star_smul r x).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem (star r) hx }
star_involutive S := NonUnitalSubalgebra.ext fun x =>
⟨fun hx => star_star x ▸ hx, fun hx => ((star_star x).symm ▸ hx : star (star x) ∈ S)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_star_iff (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (x : A) : x ∈ star S ↔ star x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
theorem star_mem_star_iff (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (x : A) : star x ∈ star S ↔ x ∈ S := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_star (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : star S = star (S : Set A) :=
rfl
theorem star_mono : Monotone (star : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
fun _ _ h _ hx => h hx
variable (R)
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The star operation on `NonUnitalSubalgebra` commutes with `NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin`. -/
theorem star_adjoin_comm (s : Set A) :
star (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s) = NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (star s) :=
have this :
∀ t : Set A, NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (star t) ≤ star (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R t) := fun _ =>
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_le fun _ hx => NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R hx
le_antisymm (by simpa only [star_star] using NonUnitalSubalgebra.star_mono (this (star s)))
(this s)
variable {R}
/-- The `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra` obtained from `S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A` by taking the
smallest non-unital subalgebra containing both `S` and `star S`. -/
@[simps!]
def starClosure (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := S ⊔ star S
star_mem' := @fun a (ha : a ∈ S ⊔ star S) => show star a ∈ S ⊔ star S by
simp only [← mem_star_iff _ a, ← (@NonUnitalAlgebra.gi R A _ _ _ _ _).l_sup_u _ _] at *
convert ha using 2
simp only [Set.sup_eq_union, star_adjoin_comm, Set.union_star, coe_star, star_star,
Set.union_comm]
theorem starClosure_le {S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A}
(h : S₁ ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra) : S₁.starClosure ≤ S₂ :=
NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff.1 <|
sup_le h fun x hx =>
(star_star x ▸ star_mem (show star x ∈ S₂ from h <| (S₁.mem_star_iff _).1 hx) : x ∈ S₂)
theorem starClosure_le_iff {S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {S₂ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S₁.starClosure ≤ S₂ ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂.toNonUnitalSubalgebra :=
⟨fun h => le_sup_left.trans h, starClosure_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem starClosure_toNonunitalSubalgebra {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.starClosure.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = S ⊔ star S :=
rfl
@[mono]
theorem starClosure_mono : Monotone (starClosure (R := R) (A := A)) :=
fun _ _ h => starClosure_le <| h.trans le_sup_left
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring A] [StarRing A] [Module R A]
variable [NonUnitalSemiring B] [StarRing B] [Module R B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B] [StarHomClass F A B]
section StarSubAlgebraA
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [StarModule R A]
open scoped Pointwise
open NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
variable (R)
/-- The minimal non-unital subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : Set A) : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A where
toNonUnitalSubalgebra := NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (s ∪ star s)
star_mem' _ := by
rwa [NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_carrier, ← NonUnitalSubalgebra.mem_star_iff,
NonUnitalSubalgebra.star_adjoin_comm, Set.union_star, star_star, Set.union_comm]
theorem adjoin_eq_starClosure_adjoin (s : Set A) :
adjoin R s = (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s).starClosure :=
toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective <| show
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (s ∪ star s) =
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s ⊔ star (NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R s)
from
(NonUnitalSubalgebra.star_adjoin_comm R s).symm ▸ NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_union s (star s)
theorem adjoin_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toNonUnitalSubalgebra = NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin R (s ∪ star s) :=
rfl
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_adjoin (s : Set A) : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
Set.subset_union_left.trans <| NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R
theorem star_subset_adjoin (s : Set A) : star s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
Set.subset_union_right.trans <| NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R
theorem self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R <| Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton x)
theorem star_self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : star x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
star_mem <| self_mem_adjoin_singleton R x
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma adjoin_induction {s : Set A} {p : (x : A) → x ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x : A) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_adjoin R s hx))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy))
(zero : p 0 (zero_mem _)) (mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(smul : ∀ (r : R) x hx, p x hx → p (r • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx))
(star : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p (star x) (star_mem hx))
{a : A} (ha : a ∈ adjoin R s) : p a ha := by
refine NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_induction (fun x hx ↦ ?_) add zero mul smul ha
simp only [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_star] at hx
obtain (hx | hx) := hx
· exact mem x hx
· simpa using star _ (NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R (by simpa using Or.inl hx)) (mem _ hx)
variable {R}
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑) := by
intro s S
rw [← toNonUnitalSubalgebra_le_iff, adjoin_toNonUnitalSubalgebra,
NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_le_iff, coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra]
exact ⟨fun h => Set.subset_union_left.trans h,
fun h => Set.union_subset h fun x hx => star_star x ▸ star_mem (show star x ∈ S from h hx)⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `Subtype.val`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) (↑) where
choice s hs := (adjoin R s).copy s <| le_antisymm (NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc
le_l_u S := (NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc (S : Set A) (adjoin R S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.copy_eq _ _ _
theorem adjoin_le {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} (hs : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc.l_le hs
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gc _ _
lemma adjoin_eq (s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : adjoin R (s : Set A) = s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le le_rfl) (subset_adjoin R (s : Set A))
lemma adjoin_eq_span (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toSubmodule = Submodule.span R (Subsemigroup.closure (s ∪ star s)) := by
rw [adjoin_toNonUnitalSubalgebra, NonUnitalAlgebra.adjoin_eq_span]
@[simp]
lemma span_eq_toSubmodule {R} [CommSemiring R] [Module R A] (s : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :
Submodule.span R (s : Set A) = s.toSubmodule := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.coe_span_eq_self]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalSubalgebra.starClosure_eq_adjoin (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
S.starClosure = adjoin R (S : Set A) :=
le_antisymm (NonUnitalSubalgebra.starClosure_le_iff.2 <| subset_adjoin R (S : Set A))
(adjoin_le (le_sup_left : S ≤ S ⊔ star S))
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice NonUnitalStarAlgebra.gi
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem top_toNonUnitalSubalgebra :
(⊤ : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubalgebra = ⊤ := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_eq_top {S : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff' top_toNonUnitalSubalgebra
|
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : NonUnitalStarSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 756 | 758 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem isLindelof_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Countable ι] (h : ∀ i, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i, f i) := (countable_range f).isLindelof_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof (hs : s.Countable) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof (hs : s.Finite) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem IsLindelof.countable_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsLindelof s) :
s.Countable := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, ht, _, hssubt⟩
rw [biUnion_of_singleton] at hssubt
exact ht.mono hssubt
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology X] : IsLindelof s ↔ s.Countable :=
⟨fun h => h.countable_of_discrete, fun h => h.isLindelof⟩
theorem IsLindelof.union (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsLindelof t) : IsLindelof (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isLindelof_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsLindelof.insert (hs : IsLindelof s) (a) : IsLindelof (insert a s) :=
isLindelof_singleton.union hs
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isLindelof_open_iff_eq_countable_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsLindelof (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsLindelof U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Countable ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨Y, f, rfl, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion h₂
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
h₁.elim_countable_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) Subset.rfl
refine ⟨t.image f', Countable.image (ht.1) f', le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht.2 ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
rw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := (mem_image ..).mp hi
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
/-- `Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets. -/
def Filter.coLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
--`Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coLindelof : (coLindelof X).HasBasis IsLindelof compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isLindelof_empty⟩
theorem mem_coLindelof : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_iff
theorem mem_coLindelof' : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_coLindelof.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof (hs : IsLindelof s) : sᶜ ∈ coLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_of_mem hs
theorem coLindelof_le_cofinite : coLindelof X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof
theorem Tendsto.isLindelof_insert_range_of_coLindelof {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (coLindelof X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne _ hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff_nonempty, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_coLindelof.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
/-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets. -/
def Filter.coclosedLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsClosed s) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coclosedLindelof :
(Filter.coclosedLindelof X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsLindelof s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedLindelof, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isLindelof_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
| theorem mem_coclosedLindelof : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_iff, and_assoc]
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 462 | 464 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.ZMod
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.IsPoly
/-!
## The Frobenius operator
If `R` has characteristic `p`, then there is a ring endomorphism `frobenius R p`
that raises `r : R` to the power `p`.
By applying `WittVector.map` to `frobenius R p`, we obtain a ring endomorphism `𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R`.
It turns out that this endomorphism can be described by polynomials over `ℤ`
that do not depend on `R` or the fact that it has characteristic `p`.
In this way, we obtain a Frobenius endomorphism `WittVector.frobeniusFun : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R`
for every commutative ring `R`.
Unfortunately, the aforementioned polynomials can not be obtained using the machinery
of `wittStructureInt` that was developed in `StructurePolynomial.lean`.
We therefore have to define the polynomials by hand, and check that they have the required property.
In case `R` has characteristic `p`, we show in `frobenius_eq_map_frobenius`
that `WittVector.frobeniusFun` is equal to `WittVector.map (frobenius R p)`.
### Main definitions and results
* `frobeniusPoly`: the polynomials that describe the coefficients of `frobeniusFun`;
* `frobeniusFun`: the Frobenius endomorphism on Witt vectors;
* `frobeniusFun_isPoly`: the tautological assertion that Frobenius is a polynomial function;
* `frobenius_eq_map_frobenius`: the fact that in characteristic `p`, Frobenius is equal to
`WittVector.map (frobenius R p)`.
TODO: Show that `WittVector.frobeniusFun` is a ring homomorphism,
and bundle it into `WittVector.frobenius`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace WittVector
variable {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
noncomputable section
open MvPolynomial Finset
variable (p)
/-- The rational polynomials that give the coefficients of `frobenius x`,
in terms of the coefficients of `x`.
These polynomials actually have integral coefficients,
see `frobeniusPoly` and `map_frobeniusPoly`. -/
def frobeniusPolyRat (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℚ :=
bind₁ (wittPolynomial p ℚ ∘ fun n => n + 1) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)
theorem bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobeniusPolyRat p) (wittPolynomial p ℚ n) = wittPolynomial p ℚ (n + 1) := by
delta frobeniusPolyRat
rw [← bind₁_bind₁, bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial, bind₁_X_right, Function.comp_apply]
local notation "v" => multiplicity
/-- An auxiliary polynomial over the integers, that satisfies
`p * (frobeniusPolyAux p n) + X n ^ p = frobeniusPoly p n`.
This makes it easy to show that `frobeniusPoly p n` is congruent to `X n ^ p`
modulo `p`. -/
noncomputable def frobeniusPolyAux : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ
| n => X (n + 1) - ∑ i : Fin n, have _ := i.is_lt
∑ j ∈ range (p ^ (n - i)),
(((X (i : ℕ) ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - (i : ℕ)) - (j + 1)) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ) *
(frobeniusPolyAux i) ^ (j + 1)) *
C (((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / (p ^ (n - i - v p (j + 1)))
* ↑p ^ (j - v p (j + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ)
omit hp in
theorem frobeniusPolyAux_eq (n : ℕ) :
frobeniusPolyAux p n =
X (n + 1) - ∑ i ∈ range n,
∑ j ∈ range (p ^ (n - i)),
(X i ^ p) ^ (p ^ (n - i) - (j + 1)) * frobeniusPolyAux p i ^ (j + 1) *
C ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) / p ^ (n - i - v p (j + 1)) *
↑p ^ (j - v p (j + 1)) : ℕ) := by
rw [frobeniusPolyAux, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
/-- The polynomials that give the coefficients of `frobenius x`,
in terms of the coefficients of `x`. -/
def frobeniusPoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
X n ^ p + C (p : ℤ) * frobeniusPolyAux p n
/-
Our next goal is to prove
```
lemma map_frobeniusPoly (n : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (frobeniusPoly p n) = frobeniusPolyRat p n
```
This lemma has a rather long proof, but it mostly boils down to applying induction,
and then using the following two key facts at the right point.
-/
/-- A key divisibility fact for the proof of `WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly`. -/
theorem map_frobeniusPoly.key₁ (n j : ℕ) (hj : j < p ^ n) :
p ^ (n - v p (j + 1)) ∣ (p ^ n).choose (j + 1) := by
apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
rw [hp.out.emultiplicity_choose_prime_pow hj j.succ_ne_zero]
/-- A key numerical identity needed for the proof of `WittVector.map_frobeniusPoly`. -/
theorem map_frobeniusPoly.key₂ {n i j : ℕ} (hi : i ≤ n) (hj : j < p ^ (n - i)) :
j - v p (j + 1) + n = i + j + (n - i - v p (j + 1)) := by
generalize h : v p (j + 1) = m
rsuffices ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ : m ≤ n - i ∧ m ≤ j
· rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h₂, add_comm i j, add_tsub_assoc_of_le (h₁.trans (Nat.sub_le n i)),
add_assoc, tsub_right_comm, add_comm i,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_tsub_of_add_le_right ((le_tsub_iff_left hi).mp h₁))]
have hle : p ^ m ≤ j + 1 := h ▸ Nat.le_of_dvd j.succ_pos (pow_multiplicity_dvd _ _)
exact ⟨(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right hp.1.one_lt).1 (hle.trans hj),
Nat.le_of_lt_succ ((m.lt_pow_self hp.1.one_lt).trans_le hle)⟩
theorem map_frobeniusPoly (n : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (frobeniusPoly p n) = frobeniusPolyRat p n := by
rw [frobeniusPoly, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_pow, map_C, map_X, eq_intCast,
Int.cast_natCast, frobeniusPolyRat]
refine Nat.strong_induction_on n ?_; clear n
intro n IH
rw [xInTermsOfW_eq]
simp only [map_sum, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow (bind₁ _), bind₁_C_right]
have h1 : (p : ℚ) ^ n * ⅟ (p : ℚ) ^ n = 1 := by rw [← mul_pow, mul_invOf_self, one_pow]
rw [bind₁_X_right, Function.comp_apply, wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ,
sum_range_succ, tsub_self, add_tsub_cancel_left, pow_zero, pow_one, pow_one, sub_mul, add_mul,
add_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_right_comm (C ((p : ℚ) ^ (n + 1))), ← C_mul, ← C_mul, pow_succ',
mul_assoc (p : ℚ) ((p : ℚ) ^ n), h1, mul_one, C_1, one_mul, add_comm _ (X n ^ p), add_assoc,
← add_sub, add_right_inj, frobeniusPolyAux_eq, RingHom.map_sub, map_X, mul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
add_comm _ (C (p : ℚ) * X (n + 1)), ← add_sub,
add_right_inj, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, neg_sub, eq_comm]
simp only [map_sum, mul_sum, sum_mul, ← sum_sub_distrib]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
rw [mem_range] at hi
rw [← IH i hi]
clear IH
rw [add_comm (X i ^ p), add_pow, sum_range_succ', pow_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.choose_zero_right,
one_mul, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_add, add_mul, Nat.succ_sub (le_of_lt hi),
Nat.succ_eq_add_one (n - i), pow_succ', pow_mul, add_sub_cancel_right, mul_sum, sum_mul]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro j hj
rw [mem_range] at hj
rw [RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_pow,
RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_pow, map_C, map_X, mul_pow]
rw [mul_comm (C (p : ℚ) ^ i), mul_comm _ ((X i ^ p) ^ _), mul_comm (C (p : ℚ) ^ (j + 1)),
mul_comm (C (p : ℚ))]
simp only [mul_assoc]
apply congr_arg
apply congr_arg
rw [← C_eq_coe_nat]
simp only [← RingHom.map_pow, ← C_mul]
rw [C_inj]
simp only [invOf_eq_inv, eq_intCast, inv_pow, Int.cast_natCast, Nat.cast_mul, Int.cast_mul]
rw [Rat.natCast_div _ _ (map_frobeniusPoly.key₁ p (n - i) j hj)]
simp only [Nat.cast_pow, pow_add, pow_one]
suffices
(((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) : ℚ) * (p : ℚ) ^ (j - v p (j + 1)) * p * (p ^ n : ℚ))
= (p : ℚ) ^ j * p * ↑((p ^ (n - i)).choose (j + 1) * p ^ i) *
(p : ℚ) ^ (n - i - v p (j + 1)) by
have aux : ∀ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ)^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro; apply pow_ne_zero; exact mod_cast hp.1.ne_zero
simpa [aux, -one_div, -pow_eq_zero_iff', field_simps] using this.symm
rw [mul_comm _ (p : ℚ), mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← pow_add,
map_frobeniusPoly.key₂ p hi.le hj, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_pow]
ring
theorem frobeniusPoly_zmod (n : ℕ) :
MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (frobeniusPoly p n) = X n ^ p := by
rw [frobeniusPoly, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_mul, map_X, map_C]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, add_zero, eq_intCast, ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, C_0]
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_frobeniusPoly_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobeniusPoly p) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [map_bind₁, map_frobeniusPoly, bind₁_frobeniusPolyRat_wittPolynomial,
map_wittPolynomial]
variable {p}
/-- `frobeniusFun` is the function underlying the ring endomorphism
`frobenius : 𝕎 R →+* frobenius 𝕎 R`. -/
def frobeniusFun (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => MvPolynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobeniusPoly p n)
omit hp in
theorem coeff_frobeniusFun (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (frobeniusFun x) n = MvPolynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobeniusPoly p n) := by
rw [frobeniusFun, coeff_mk]
variable (p) in
/-- `frobeniusFun` is tautologically a polynomial function.
See also `frobenius_isPoly`. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance frobeniusFun_isPoly : IsPoly p fun R _ Rcr => @frobeniusFun p R _ Rcr :=
⟨⟨frobeniusPoly p, by intros; funext n; apply coeff_frobeniusFun⟩⟩
@[ghost_simps]
theorem ghostComponent_frobeniusFun (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghostComponent n (frobeniusFun x) = ghostComponent (n + 1) x := by
simp only [ghostComponent_apply, frobeniusFun, coeff_mk, ← bind₁_frobeniusPoly_wittPolynomial,
aeval_bind₁]
/-- If `R` has characteristic `p`, then there is a ring endomorphism
that raises `r : R` to the power `p`.
By applying `WittVector.map` to this endomorphism,
we obtain a ring endomorphism `frobenius R p : 𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R`.
The underlying function of this morphism is `WittVector.frobeniusFun`.
-/
def frobenius : 𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 R where
toFun := frobeniusFun
map_zero' := by
-- Porting note: removing the placeholders give an error
refine IsPoly.ext (@IsPoly.comp p _ _ (frobeniusFun_isPoly p) WittVector.zeroIsPoly)
(@IsPoly.comp p _ _ WittVector.zeroIsPoly
(frobeniusFun_isPoly p)) ?_ _ 0
simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_zero, forall_const]
ghost_simp
map_one' := by
refine
-- Porting note: removing the placeholders give an error
IsPoly.ext (@IsPoly.comp p _ _ (frobeniusFun_isPoly p) WittVector.oneIsPoly)
(@IsPoly.comp p _ _ WittVector.oneIsPoly (frobeniusFun_isPoly p)) ?_ _ 0
simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_one, forall_const]
ghost_simp
map_add' := by ghost_calc _ _; ghost_simp
map_mul' := by ghost_calc _ _; ghost_simp
theorem coeff_frobenius (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (frobenius x) n = MvPolynomial.aeval x.coeff (frobeniusPoly p n) :=
coeff_frobeniusFun _ _
@[ghost_simps]
theorem ghostComponent_frobenius (n : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) :
ghostComponent n (frobenius x) = ghostComponent (n + 1) x :=
ghostComponent_frobeniusFun _ _
variable (p)
/-- `frobenius` is tautologically a polynomial function. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance frobenius_isPoly : IsPoly p fun R _Rcr => @frobenius p R _ _Rcr :=
frobeniusFun_isPoly _
section CharP
variable [CharP R p]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_frobenius_charP (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (frobenius x) n = x.coeff n ^ p := by
rw [coeff_frobenius]
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) R := ZMod.algebra _ _
-- outline of the calculation, proofs follow below
calc
aeval (fun k => x.coeff k) (frobeniusPoly p n) =
aeval (fun k => x.coeff k)
(MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (frobeniusPoly p n)) := ?_
_ = aeval (fun k => x.coeff k) (X n ^ p : MvPolynomial ℕ (ZMod p)) := ?_
_ = x.coeff n ^ p := ?_
· conv_rhs => rw [aeval_eq_eval₂Hom, eval₂Hom_map_hom]
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) rfl rfl
· rw [frobeniusPoly_zmod]
· rw [map_pow, aeval_X]
theorem frobenius_eq_map_frobenius : @frobenius p R _ _ = map (_root_.frobenius R p) := by
ext (x n)
simp only [coeff_frobenius_charP, map_coeff, frobenius_def]
@[simp]
theorem frobenius_zmodp (x : 𝕎 (ZMod p)) : frobenius x = x := by
simp only [WittVector.ext_iff, coeff_frobenius_charP, ZMod.pow_card, eq_self_iff_true,
forall_const]
variable (R)
/-- `WittVector.frobenius` as an equiv. -/
| @[simps -fullyApplied]
def frobeniusEquiv [PerfectRing R p] : WittVector p R ≃+* WittVector p R :=
{ (WittVector.frobenius : WittVector p R →+* WittVector p R) with
toFun := WittVector.frobenius
invFun := map (_root_.frobeniusEquiv R p).symm
left_inv := fun f => ext fun n => by
rw [frobenius_eq_map_frobenius]
exact frobeniusEquiv_symm_apply_frobenius R p _
right_inv := fun f => ext fun n => by
rw [frobenius_eq_map_frobenius]
exact frobenius_apply_frobeniusEquiv_symm R p _ }
theorem frobenius_bijective [PerfectRing R p] :
Function.Bijective (@WittVector.frobenius p R _ _) :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Frobenius.lean | 293 | 306 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
/-! # The Wallis formula for Pi
This file establishes the Wallis product for `π` (`Real.tendsto_prod_pi_div_two`). Our proof is
largely about analyzing the behaviour of the sequence `∫ x in 0..π, sin x ^ n` as `n → ∞`.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallis_product
The proof can be broken down into two pieces. The first step (carried out in
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals`) is to use repeated integration by parts to obtain an
explicit formula for this integral, which is rational if `n` is odd and a rational multiple of `π`
if `n` is even.
The second step, carried out here, is to estimate the ratio
`∫ (x : ℝ) in 0..π, sin x ^ (2 * k + 1) / ∫ (x : ℝ) in 0..π, sin x ^ (2 * k)` and prove that
it converges to one using the squeeze theorem. The final product for `π` is obtained after some
algebraic manipulation.
## Main statements
* `Real.Wallis.W`: the product of the first `k` terms in Wallis' formula for `π`.
* `Real.Wallis.W_eq_integral_sin_pow_div_integral_sin_pow`: express `W n` as a ratio of integrals.
* `Real.Wallis.W_le` and `Real.Wallis.le_W`: upper and lower bounds for `W n`.
* `Real.tendsto_prod_pi_div_two`: the Wallis product formula.
-/
open scoped Real Topology Nat
open Filter Finset intervalIntegral
namespace Real
namespace Wallis
/-- The product of the first `k` terms in Wallis' formula for `π`. -/
noncomputable def W (k : ℕ) : ℝ :=
∏ i ∈ range k, (2 * i + 2) / (2 * i + 1) * ((2 * i + 2) / (2 * i + 3))
theorem W_succ (k : ℕ) :
W (k + 1) = W k * ((2 * k + 2) / (2 * k + 1) * ((2 * k + 2) / (2 * k + 3))) :=
prod_range_succ _ _
theorem W_pos (k : ℕ) : 0 < W k := by
induction' k with k hk
· unfold W; simp
· rw [W_succ]
refine mul_pos hk (mul_pos (div_pos ?_ ?_) (div_pos ?_ ?_)) <;> positivity
theorem W_eq_factorial_ratio (n : ℕ) :
W n = 2 ^ (4 * n) * n ! ^ 4 / ((2 * n)! ^ 2 * (2 * n + 1)) := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [W, prod_range_zero, Nat.factorial_zero, mul_zero, pow_zero,
algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow, mul_one, algebraMap.coe_zero, zero_add, div_self, Ne,
one_ne_zero, not_false_iff]
norm_num
· unfold W at IH ⊢
rw [prod_range_succ, IH, _root_.div_mul_div_comm, _root_.div_mul_div_comm]
refine (div_eq_div_iff ?_ ?_).mpr ?_
any_goals exact ne_of_gt (by positivity)
simp_rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ]
push_cast
ring_nf
theorem W_eq_integral_sin_pow_div_integral_sin_pow (k : ℕ) : (π / 2)⁻¹ * W k =
(∫ x : ℝ in (0)..π, sin x ^ (2 * k + 1)) / ∫ x : ℝ in (0)..π, sin x ^ (2 * k) := by
rw [integral_sin_pow_even, integral_sin_pow_odd, mul_div_mul_comm, ← prod_div_distrib, inv_div]
simp_rw [div_div_div_comm, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
rfl
theorem W_le (k : ℕ) : W k ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [← div_le_one pi_div_two_pos, div_eq_inv_mul]
rw [W_eq_integral_sin_pow_div_integral_sin_pow, div_le_one (integral_sin_pow_pos _)]
apply integral_sin_pow_succ_le
theorem le_W (k : ℕ) : ((2 : ℝ) * k + 1) / (2 * k + 2) * (π / 2) ≤ W k := by
rw [← le_div_iff₀ pi_div_two_pos, div_eq_inv_mul (W k) _]
rw [W_eq_integral_sin_pow_div_integral_sin_pow, le_div_iff₀ (integral_sin_pow_pos _)]
| convert integral_sin_pow_succ_le (2 * k + 1)
rw [integral_sin_pow (2 * k)]
simp
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pi/Wallis.lean | 85 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.FilterProduct
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Construction of the hyperreal numbers as an ultraproduct of real sequences.
-/
open Filter Germ Topology
/-- Hyperreal numbers on the ultrafilter extending the cofinite filter -/
def Hyperreal : Type :=
Germ (hyperfilter ℕ : Filter ℕ) ℝ deriving Inhabited
namespace Hyperreal
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℝ*" => Hyperreal
noncomputable instance : Field ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (Field (Germ _ _))
noncomputable instance : LinearOrder ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder (Germ _ _))
instance : IsStrictOrderedRing ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (IsStrictOrderedRing (Germ _ _))
/-- Natural embedding `ℝ → ℝ*`. -/
@[coe] def ofReal : ℝ → ℝ* := const
noncomputable instance : CoeTC ℝ ℝ* := ⟨ofReal⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = y ↔ x = y :=
Germ.const_inj
theorem coe_ne_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ y ↔ x ≠ y :=
coe_eq_coe.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_one {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
coe_eq_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
coe_ne_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ne_one {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
coe_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (x : ℝ) : ↑x⁻¹ = (x⁻¹ : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x) = (-x : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y) = (x + y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : ℝ*) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x * y) = (x * y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x / y) = (x / y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y) = (x - y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Germ.const_le_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) < y ↔ x < y :=
Germ.const_lt_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ (x : ℝ*) ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < (x : ℝ*) ↔ 0 < x :=
coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_abs (x : ℝ) : ((|x| : ℝ) : ℝ*) = |↑x| :=
const_abs x
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℝ) : ((max x y : ℝ) : ℝ*) = max ↑x ↑y :=
Germ.const_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℝ) : ((min x y : ℝ) : ℝ*) = min ↑x ↑y :=
Germ.const_min _ _
/-- Construct a hyperreal number from a sequence of real numbers. -/
def ofSeq (f : ℕ → ℝ) : ℝ* := (↑f : Germ (hyperfilter ℕ : Filter ℕ) ℝ)
theorem ofSeq_surjective : Function.Surjective ofSeq := Quot.exists_rep
theorem ofSeq_lt_ofSeq {f g : ℕ → ℝ} : ofSeq f < ofSeq g ↔ ∀ᶠ n in hyperfilter ℕ, f n < g n :=
Germ.coe_lt
/-- A sample infinitesimal hyperreal -/
noncomputable def epsilon : ℝ* :=
ofSeq fun n => n⁻¹
/-- A sample infinite hyperreal -/
noncomputable def omega : ℝ* := ofSeq Nat.cast
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ε" => Hyperreal.epsilon
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ω" => Hyperreal.omega
@[simp]
theorem inv_omega : ω⁻¹ = ε :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inv_epsilon : ε⁻¹ = ω :=
@inv_inv _ _ ω
theorem omega_pos : 0 < ω :=
Germ.coe_pos.2 <| Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop <| (eventually_gt_atTop 0).mono fun _ ↦
Nat.cast_pos.2
theorem epsilon_pos : 0 < ε :=
inv_pos_of_pos omega_pos
theorem epsilon_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0 :=
epsilon_pos.ne'
theorem omega_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega_pos.ne'
theorem epsilon_mul_omega : ε * ω = 1 :=
@inv_mul_cancel₀ _ _ ω omega_ne_zero
theorem lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, 0 < r → ofSeq f < (r : ℝ*) := fun hr ↦
ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.2 <| (hf.eventually <| gt_mem_nhds hr).filter_mono Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop
theorem neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, 0 < r → (-r : ℝ*) < ofSeq f := fun hr =>
have hg := hf.neg
neg_lt_of_neg_lt (by rw [neg_zero] at hg; exact lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos hg hr)
theorem gt_of_tendsto_zero_of_neg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, r < 0 → (r : ℝ*) < ofSeq f := fun {r} hr => by
rw [← neg_neg r, coe_neg]; exact neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos hf (neg_pos.mpr hr)
theorem epsilon_lt_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x → ε < x :=
lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
/-- Standard part predicate -/
def IsSt (x : ℝ*) (r : ℝ) :=
∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → (r - δ : ℝ*) < x ∧ x < r + δ
open scoped Classical in
/-- Standard part function: like a "round" to ℝ instead of ℤ -/
noncomputable def st : ℝ* → ℝ := fun x => if h : ∃ r, IsSt x r then Classical.choose h else 0
/-- A hyperreal number is infinitesimal if its standard part is 0 -/
def Infinitesimal (x : ℝ*) :=
IsSt x 0
/-- A hyperreal number is positive infinite if it is larger than all real numbers -/
def InfinitePos (x : ℝ*) :=
∀ r : ℝ, ↑r < x
/-- A hyperreal number is negative infinite if it is smaller than all real numbers -/
def InfiniteNeg (x : ℝ*) :=
∀ r : ℝ, x < r
/-- A hyperreal number is infinite if it is infinite positive or infinite negative -/
def Infinite (x : ℝ*) :=
InfinitePos x ∨ InfiniteNeg x
/-!
### Some facts about `st`
-/
| theorem isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto {f : ℕ → ℝ} {r : ℝ} :
IsSt (ofSeq f) r ↔ Tendsto f (hyperfilter ℕ) (𝓝 r) :=
Iff.trans (forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ (ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.and ofSeq_lt_ofSeq).trans eventually_and.symm)
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Hyperreal.lean | 212 | 214 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
/-!
# Cycles of a permutation
This file starts the theory of cycles in permutations.
## Main definitions
In the following, `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.SameCycle`: `f.SameCycle x y` when `x` and `y` are in the same cycle of `f`.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle`: `f` is a cycle if any two nonfixed points of `f` are related by repeated
applications of `f`, and `f` is not the identity.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn`: `f` is a cycle on a set `s` when any two points of `s` are related by
repeated applications of `f`.
## Notes
`Equiv.Perm.IsCycle` and `Equiv.Perm.IsCycleOn` are different in three ways:
* `IsCycle` is about the entire type while `IsCycleOn` is restricted to a set.
* `IsCycle` forbids the identity while `IsCycleOn` allows it (if `s` is a subsingleton).
* `IsCycleOn` forbids fixed points on `s` (if `s` is nontrivial), while `IsCycle` allows them.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-! ### `SameCycle` -/
section SameCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {p : α → Prop} {x y z : α}
/-- The equivalence relation indicating that two points are in the same cycle of a permutation. -/
def SameCycle (f : Perm α) (x y : α) : Prop :=
∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y
@[refl]
theorem SameCycle.refl (f : Perm α) (x : α) : SameCycle f x x :=
⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.rfl : SameCycle f x x :=
SameCycle.refl _ _
protected theorem _root_.Eq.sameCycle (h : x = y) (f : Perm α) : f.SameCycle x y := by rw [h]
@[symm]
theorem SameCycle.symm : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y x := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
⟨-i, by rw [zpow_neg, ← hi, inv_apply_self]⟩
theorem sameCycle_comm : SameCycle f x y ↔ SameCycle f y x :=
⟨SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem SameCycle.trans : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle f y z → SameCycle f x z :=
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ => ⟨j + i, by rw [zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, hj]⟩
variable (f) in
theorem SameCycle.equivalence : Equivalence (SameCycle f) :=
⟨SameCycle.refl f, SameCycle.symm, SameCycle.trans⟩
/-- The setoid defined by the `SameCycle` relation. -/
def SameCycle.setoid (f : Perm α) : Setoid α where
r := f.SameCycle
iseqv := SameCycle.equivalence f
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_one : SameCycle 1 x y ↔ x = y := by simp [SameCycle]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv : SameCycle f⁻¹ x y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv, SameCycle.inv⟩ := sameCycle_inv
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_conj : SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) x y ↔ SameCycle f (g⁻¹ x) (g⁻¹ y) :=
exists_congr fun i => by simp [conj_zpow, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem SameCycle.conj : SameCycle f x y → SameCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) (g x) (g y) := by
simp [sameCycle_conj]
theorem SameCycle.apply_eq_self_iff : SameCycle f x y → (f x = x ↔ f y = y) := fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_one_add, add_comm, zpow_add_one, mul_apply,
(f ^ i).injective.eq_iff]
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_left (h : SameCycle f x y) (hx : IsFixedPt f x) : x = y :=
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := h
(hx.perm_zpow _).eq.symm.trans hn
theorem SameCycle.eq_of_right (h : SameCycle f x y) (hy : IsFixedPt f y) : x = y :=
h.eq_of_left <| h.apply_eq_self_iff.2 hy
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_left : SameCycle f (f x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight 1).exists_congr_left.trans <| by
simp [zpow_sub, SameCycle, Int.add_neg_one, Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_apply_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_left : SameCycle f (f⁻¹ x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_left, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_inv_apply_right : SameCycle f x (f⁻¹ y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← sameCycle_apply_right, apply_inv_self]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_left {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y :=
(Equiv.addRight (n : ℤ)).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [SameCycle, zpow_add]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_zpow_right {n : ℤ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [sameCycle_comm, sameCycle_zpow_left, sameCycle_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_left {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f ((f ^ n) x) y ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_left]
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_pow_right {n : ℕ} : SameCycle f x ((f ^ n) y) ↔ SameCycle f x y := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, sameCycle_zpow_right]
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_left, SameCycle.apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_apply_right, SameCycle.apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_left, SameCycle.inv_apply_left⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_inv_apply_right, SameCycle.inv_apply_right⟩ := sameCycle_inv_apply_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_left, SameCycle.pow_left⟩ := sameCycle_pow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_pow_right, SameCycle.pow_right⟩ := sameCycle_pow_right
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_left, SameCycle.zpow_left⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_left
alias ⟨SameCycle.of_zpow_right, SameCycle.zpow_right⟩ := sameCycle_zpow_right
theorem SameCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
theorem SameCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} : SameCycle (f ^ n) x y → SameCycle f x y := fun ⟨m, h⟩ =>
⟨n * m, by simp [zpow_mul, h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_subtypePerm {h} {x y : { x // p x }} :
(f.subtypePerm h).SameCycle x y ↔ f.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.subtypePerm⟩ := sameCycle_subtypePerm
@[simp]
theorem sameCycle_extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} :
SameCycle (g.extendDomain f) (f x) (f y) ↔ g.SameCycle x y :=
exists_congr fun n => by
rw [← extendDomain_zpow, extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_inj, f.injective.eq_iff]
alias ⟨_, SameCycle.extendDomain⟩ := sameCycle_extendDomain
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' [Finite α] : SameCycle f x y → ∃ i < orderOf f, (f ^ i) x = y := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use (k % orderOf f).natAbs
have h₀ := Int.natCast_pos.mpr (orderOf_pos f)
have h₁ := Int.emod_nonneg k h₀.ne'
rw [← zpow_natCast, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁, zpow_mod_orderOf]
refine ⟨?_, by rfl⟩
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg h₁]
exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ h₀
theorem SameCycle.exists_pow_eq'' [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, 0 < i ∧ i ≤ orderOf f ∧ (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨_ | i, hi, rfl⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
· refine ⟨orderOf f, orderOf_pos f, le_rfl, ?_⟩
rw [pow_orderOf_eq_one, pow_zero]
· exact ⟨i.succ, i.zero_lt_succ, hi.le, by rfl⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_fin_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : Fin (orderOf f), (f ^ (i : ℕ)) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ := SameCycle.exists_pow_eq' h
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩
theorem SameCycle.exists_nat_pow_eq [Finite α] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
obtain ⟨i, _, hi⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq'
exact ⟨i, hi⟩
instance (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel (SameCycle f)] :
DecidableRel (SameCycle f⁻¹) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (f.SameCycle x y) (sameCycle_inv).symm
instance (priority := 100) [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel (SameCycle (1 : Perm α)) := fun x y =>
decidable_of_iff (x = y) sameCycle_one.symm
end SameCycle
/-!
### `IsCycle`
-/
section IsCycle
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- A cycle is a non identity permutation where any two nonfixed points of the permutation are
related by repeated application of the permutation. -/
def IsCycle (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x, f x ≠ x ∧ ∀ ⦃y⦄, f y ≠ y → SameCycle f x y
theorem IsCycle.ne_one (h : IsCycle f) : f ≠ 1 := fun hf => by simp [hf, IsCycle] at h
@[simp]
theorem not_isCycle_one : ¬(1 : Perm α).IsCycle := fun H => H.ne_one rfl
protected theorem IsCycle.sameCycle (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
SameCycle f x y :=
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hg.2 hx
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := hg.2 hy
⟨b - a, by rw [← ha, ← mul_apply, ← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel, hb]⟩
theorem IsCycle.exists_zpow_eq : IsCycle f → f x ≠ x → f y ≠ y → ∃ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = y :=
IsCycle.sameCycle
theorem IsCycle.inv (hf : IsCycle f) : IsCycle f⁻¹ :=
hf.imp fun _ ⟨hx, h⟩ =>
⟨inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hx.symm, fun _ hy => (h <| inv_eq_iff_eq.not.2 hy.symm).inv⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_inv : IsCycle f⁻¹ ↔ IsCycle f :=
⟨fun h => h.inv, IsCycle.inv⟩
theorem IsCycle.conj : IsCycle f → IsCycle (g * f * g⁻¹) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx, h⟩
refine ⟨g x, by simp [coe_mul, inv_apply_self, hx], fun y hy => ?_⟩
rw [← apply_inv_self g y]
exact (h <| eq_inv_iff_eq.not.2 hy).conj
protected theorem IsCycle.extendDomain {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) :
IsCycle g → IsCycle (g.extendDomain f) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩
refine ⟨f a, ?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· rw [extendDomain_apply_image]
exact Subtype.coe_injective.ne (f.injective.ne ha)
have h : b = f (f.symm ⟨b, of_not_not <| hb ∘ extendDomain_apply_not_subtype _ _⟩) := by
rw [apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [h] at hb ⊢
simp only [extendDomain_apply_image, Subtype.coe_injective.ne_iff, f.injective.ne_iff] at hb
exact (ha' hb).extendDomain
theorem isCycle_iff_sameCycle (hx : f x ≠ x) : IsCycle f ↔ ∀ {y}, SameCycle f x y ↔ f y ≠ y :=
⟨fun hf y =>
⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ hy =>
hx <| by
rw [← zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy i, (f ^ i).injective.eq_iff] at hi
rw [hi, hy],
hf.exists_zpow_eq hx⟩,
fun h => ⟨x, hx, fun _ hy => h.2 hy⟩⟩
section Finite
variable [Finite α]
theorem IsCycle.exists_pow_eq (hf : IsCycle f) (hx : f x ≠ x) (hy : f y ≠ y) :
∃ i : ℕ, (f ^ i) x = y := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx hy
classical exact
⟨(n % orderOf f).toNat, by
{have := n.emod_nonneg (Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt (orderOf_pos f)))
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this, zpow_mod_orderOf]}⟩
end Finite
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem isCycle_swap (hxy : x ≠ y) : IsCycle (swap x y) :=
⟨y, by rwa [swap_apply_right], fun a (ha : ite (a = x) y (ite (a = y) x a) ≠ a) =>
if hya : y = a then ⟨0, hya⟩
else
⟨1, by
rw [zpow_one, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs at * <;> tauto⟩⟩
protected theorem IsSwap.isCycle : IsSwap f → IsCycle f := by
rintro ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩
exact isCycle_swap hxy
variable [Fintype α]
theorem IsCycle.two_le_card_support (h : IsCycle f) : 2 ≤ #f.support :=
two_le_card_support_of_ne_one h.ne_one
/-- The subgroup generated by a cycle is in bijection with its support -/
noncomputable def IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) :
(Subgroup.zpowers σ) ≃ σ.support :=
Equiv.ofBijective
(fun (τ : ↥ ((Subgroup.zpowers σ) : Set (Perm α))) =>
⟨(τ : Perm α) (Classical.choose hσ), by
obtain ⟨τ, n, rfl⟩ := τ
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
exact (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1⟩)
(by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, m, rfl⟩ ⟨b, n, rfl⟩ h
ext y
by_cases hy : σ y = y
· simp_rw [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hy]
· obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_mk, zpow_apply_comm σ m i, zpow_apply_comm σ n i]
exact congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext_iff.mp h)
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [mem_support] at hy
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := (Classical.choose_spec hσ).2 hy
exact ⟨⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) {n : ℕ} :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport ⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ =
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport_symm_apply {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) (n : ℕ) :
hσ.zpowersEquivSupport.symm
⟨(σ ^ n) (Classical.choose hσ),
pow_apply_mem_support.2 (mem_support.2 (Classical.choose_spec hσ).1)⟩ =
⟨σ ^ n, n, rfl⟩ :=
(Equiv.symm_apply_eq _).2 hσ.zpowersEquivSupport_apply
protected theorem IsCycle.orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) : orderOf f = #f.support := by
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers, ← Fintype.card_coe]
convert Fintype.card_congr (IsCycle.zpowersEquivSupport hf)
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℕ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => exact fun _ h => ⟨0, h⟩
| succ n hn =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb' : (swap x (f x) * f) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, apply_inv_self, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx), Ne, ←
f.injective.eq_iff, apply_inv_self]
exact this.1
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn hb' (f.injective <| by
rw [apply_inv_self]; rwa [pow_succ', mul_apply] at h)
⟨i + 1, by
rw [add_comm, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi, zpow_one, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb).2 (Ne.symm hfbx)]⟩
theorem isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] :
∀ (n : ℤ) {b x : α} {f : Perm α} (_ : (swap x (f x) * f) b ≠ b) (_ : (f ^ n) (f x) = b),
∃ i : ℤ, ((swap x (f x) * f) ^ i) (f x) = b := by
intro n
cases n with
| ofNat n => exact isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n
| negSucc n =>
intro b x f hb h
exact if hfbx' : f x = b then ⟨0, hfbx'⟩
else
have : f b ≠ b ∧ b ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hb
have hb : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f⁻¹ b) ≠ f⁻¹ b := by
rw [mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs <;>
simp only [inv_eq_iff_eq, Perm.mul_apply, zpow_negSucc, Ne, Perm.apply_inv_self] at *
<;> tauto
let ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₁ n hb
(show (f⁻¹ ^ n) (f⁻¹ x) = f⁻¹ b by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← h, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, ← mul_apply, zpow_negSucc,
← inv_pow, pow_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, mul_one, zpow_natCast,
← pow_succ', ← pow_succ])
have h : (swap x (f⁻¹ x) * f⁻¹) (f x) = f⁻¹ x := by
rw [mul_apply, inv_apply_self, swap_apply_left]
⟨-i, by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right i 1, neg_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add, zpow_one, zpow_neg,
← inv_zpow, mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, mul_swap_eq_swap_mul, inv_apply_self, swap_comm _ x,
zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply, mul_apply (_ ^ i), h, hi, mul_apply, apply_inv_self,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne this.2 (Ne.symm hfbx')]⟩
theorem IsCycle.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α}
(hf : IsCycle f) {x : α} (hfx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) = x) : f = swap x (f x) :=
Equiv.ext fun y =>
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hz.2 hfx
if hyx : y = x then by simp [hyx]
else
if hfyx : y = f x then by simp [hfyx, hffx]
else by
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hyx hfyx]
refine by_contradiction fun hy => ?_
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hz.2 hy
rw [← sub_add_cancel j i, zpow_add, mul_apply, hi] at hj
rcases zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx (j - i) with hji | hji
· rw [← hj, hji] at hyx
tauto
· rw [← hj, hji] at hfyx
tauto
theorem IsCycle.swap_mul {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) {x : α}
(hx : f x ≠ x) (hffx : f (f x) ≠ x) : IsCycle (swap x (f x) * f) :=
⟨f x, by simp [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, if_neg hffx, f.injective.eq_iff, if_neg hx, hx],
fun y hy =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf.exists_zpow_eq hx (ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy).1
have hi : (f ^ (i - 1)) (f x) = y :=
calc
(f ^ (i - 1) : Perm α) (f x) = (f ^ (i - 1) * f ^ (1 : ℤ) : Perm α) x := by simp
_ = y := by rwa [← zpow_add, sub_add_cancel]
isCycle_swap_mul_aux₂ (i - 1) hy hi⟩
theorem IsCycle.sign {f : Perm α} (hf : IsCycle f) : sign f = -(-1) ^ #f.support :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
calc
Perm.sign f = Perm.sign (swap x (f x) * (swap x (f x) * f)) := by
{rw [← mul_assoc, mul_def, mul_def, swap_swap, trans_refl]}
_ = -(-1) ^ #f.support :=
if h1 : f (f x) = x then by
have h : swap x (f x) * f = 1 := by
simp only [mul_def, one_def]
rw [hf.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self hx.1 h1, swap_apply_left, swap_swap]
rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, h, sign_one,
hf.eq_swap_of_apply_apply_eq_self hx.1 h1, card_support_swap hx.1.symm]
rfl
else by
have h : #(swap x (f x) * f).support + 1 = #f.support := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_support.2 hx.1), support_swap_mul_eq _ _ h1,
card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_erase _ _), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
have : #(swap x (f x) * f).support < #f.support := card_support_swap_mul hx.1
rw [sign_mul, sign_swap hx.1.symm, (hf.swap_mul hx.1 h1).sign, ← h]
simp only [mul_neg, neg_mul, one_mul, neg_neg, pow_add, pow_one, mul_one]
termination_by #f.support
theorem IsCycle.of_pow {n : ℕ} (h1 : IsCycle (f ^ n)) (h2 : f.support ⊆ (f ^ n).support) :
IsCycle f := by
have key : ∀ x : α, (f ^ n) x ≠ x ↔ f x ≠ x := by
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.ext_iff]
exact (support_pow_le _ n).antisymm h2
obtain ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ := h1
refine ⟨x, (key x).mp hx1, fun y hy => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ := hx2 ((key y).mpr hy)
exact ⟨n * i, by rwa [zpow_mul]⟩
-- The lemma `support_zpow_le` is relevant. It means that `h2` is equivalent to
-- `σ.support = (σ ^ n).support`, as well as to `#σ.support ≤ #(σ ^ n).support`.
theorem IsCycle.of_zpow {n : ℤ} (h1 : IsCycle (f ^ n)) (h2 : f.support ⊆ (f ^ n).support) :
IsCycle f := by
cases n
· exact h1.of_pow h2
· simp only [le_eq_subset, zpow_negSucc, Perm.support_inv] at h1 h2
exact (inv_inv (f ^ _) ▸ h1.inv).of_pow h2
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles {l : List (Perm β)} (h1 : ∀ f ∈ l, IsCycle f)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup :=
nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint (fun h => (h1 1 h).ne_one rfl) h2
/-- Unlike `support_congr`, which assumes that `∀ (x ∈ g.support), f x = g x)`, here
we have the weaker assumption that `∀ (x ∈ f.support), f x = g x`. -/
theorem IsCycle.support_congr (hf : IsCycle f) (hg : IsCycle g) (h : f.support ⊆ g.support)
(h' : ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
have : f.support = g.support := by
refine le_antisymm h ?_
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, _⟩ := id hf
have hx' : g x ≠ x := by rwa [← h' x (mem_support.mpr hx)]
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hg.exists_pow_eq hx' (mem_support.mp hz)
have h'' : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x := by
intro x hx
exact h' x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)
rwa [← hm, ←
pow_eq_on_of_mem_support h'' _ x
(mem_inter_of_mem (mem_support.mpr hx) (mem_support.mpr hx')),
pow_apply_mem_support, mem_support]
refine Equiv.Perm.support_congr h ?_
simpa [← this] using h'
/-- If two cyclic permutations agree on all terms in their intersection,
and that intersection is not empty, then the two cyclic permutations must be equal. -/
theorem IsCycle.eq_on_support_inter_nonempty_congr (hf : IsCycle f) (hg : IsCycle g)
(h : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x)
(hx : f x = g x) (hx' : x ∈ f.support) : f = g := by
have hx'' : x ∈ g.support := by rwa [mem_support, ← hx, ← mem_support]
have : f.support ⊆ g.support := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq (mem_support.mp hx') (mem_support.mp hy)
rwa [pow_eq_on_of_mem_support h _ _ (mem_inter_of_mem hx' hx''), pow_apply_mem_support]
rw [inter_eq_left.mpr this] at h
exact hf.support_congr hg this h
theorem IsCycle.support_pow_eq_iff (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
support (f ^ n) = support f ↔ ¬orderOf f ∣ n := by
rw [orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
constructor
· intro h H
refine hf.ne_one ?_
rw [← support_eq_empty_iff, ← h, H, support_one]
· intro H
apply le_antisymm (support_pow_le _ n) _
intro x hx
contrapose! H
ext z
by_cases hz : f z = z
· rw [pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hz, one_apply]
· obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hf.exists_pow_eq hz (mem_support.mp hx)
apply (f ^ k).injective
rw [← mul_apply, (Commute.pow_pow_self _ _ _).eq, mul_apply]
simpa using H
theorem IsCycle.support_pow_of_pos_of_lt_orderOf (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} (npos : 0 < n)
(hn : n < orderOf f) : (f ^ n).support = f.support :=
hf.support_pow_eq_iff.2 <| Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt npos hn
theorem IsCycle.pow_iff [Finite β] {f : Perm β} (hf : IsCycle f) {n : ℕ} :
IsCycle (f ^ n) ↔ n.Coprime (orderOf f) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
constructor
· intro h
have hr : support (f ^ n) = support f := by
rw [hf.support_pow_eq_iff]
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
refine h.ne_one ?_
simp [pow_mul, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
have : orderOf (f ^ n) = orderOf f := by rw [h.orderOf, hr, hf.orderOf]
rw [orderOf_pow, Nat.div_eq_self] at this
rcases this with h | _
| · exact absurd h (orderOf_pos _).ne'
· rwa [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm]
· intro h
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_pow_eq_self_of_coprime h
have hf' : IsCycle ((f ^ n) ^ m) := by rwa [hm]
refine hf'.of_pow fun x hx => ?_
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Basic.lean | 550 | 555 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_closedBall (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
namespace Behrend
variable {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem card_box : #(box n d) = d ^ n := by simp [box]
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) := {x ∈ box n d | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k}
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by simp [sphere]
theorem sphere_subset_box : sphere n d k ⊆ box n d :=
| filter_subset _ _
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 114 | 114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Batteries.WF
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
/-!
# Partial functions
This file defines partial functions. Partial functions are like functions, except they can also be
"undefined" on some inputs. We define them as functions `α → Part β`.
## Definitions
* `PFun α β`: Type of partial functions from `α` to `β`. Defined as `α → Part β` and denoted
`α →. β`.
* `PFun.Dom`: Domain of a partial function. Set of values on which it is defined. Not to be confused
with the domain of a function `α → β`, which is a type (`α` presently).
* `PFun.fn`: Evaluation of a partial function. Takes in an element and a proof it belongs to the
partial function's `Dom`.
* `PFun.asSubtype`: Returns a partial function as a function from its `Dom`.
* `PFun.toSubtype`: Restricts the codomain of a function to a subtype.
* `PFun.evalOpt`: Returns a partial function with a decidable `Dom` as a function `a → Option β`.
* `PFun.lift`: Turns a function into a partial function.
* `PFun.id`: The identity as a partial function.
* `PFun.comp`: Composition of partial functions.
* `PFun.restrict`: Restriction of a partial function to a smaller `Dom`.
* `PFun.res`: Turns a function into a partial function with a prescribed domain.
* `PFun.fix` : First return map of a partial function `f : α →. β ⊕ α`.
* `PFun.fix_induction`: A recursion principle for `PFun.fix`.
### Partial functions as relations
Partial functions can be considered as relations, so we specialize some `Rel` definitions to `PFun`:
* `PFun.image`: Image of a set under a partial function.
* `PFun.ran`: Range of a partial function.
* `PFun.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a partial function.
* `PFun.core`: Core of a set under a partial function.
* `PFun.graph`: Graph of a partial function `a →. β`as a `Set (α × β)`.
* `PFun.graph'`: Graph of a partial function `a →. β`as a `Rel α β`.
### `PFun α` as a monad
Monad operations:
* `PFun.pure`: The monad `pure` function, the constant `x` function.
* `PFun.bind`: The monad `bind` function, pointwise `Part.bind`
* `PFun.map`: The monad `map` function, pointwise `Part.map`.
-/
-- Pending rename in core.
alias WellFounded.fixF_eq := WellFounded.fixFEq
open Function
/-- `PFun α β`, or `α →. β`, is the type of partial functions from
`α` to `β`. It is defined as `α → Part β`. -/
def PFun (α β : Type*) :=
α → Part β
/-- `α →. β` is notation for the type `PFun α β` of partial functions from `α` to `β`. -/
infixr:25 " →. " => PFun
namespace PFun
variable {α β γ δ ε ι : Type*}
instance inhabited : Inhabited (α →. β) :=
⟨fun _ => Part.none⟩
/-- The domain of a partial function -/
def Dom (f : α →. β) : Set α :=
{ a | (f a).Dom }
@[simp]
theorem mem_dom (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ Dom f ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ f x := by simp [Dom, Part.dom_iff_mem]
@[simp]
theorem dom_mk (p : α → Prop) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) : (PFun.Dom fun x => ⟨p x, f x⟩) = { x | p x } :=
rfl
theorem dom_eq (f : α →. β) : Dom f = { x | ∃ y, y ∈ f x } :=
Set.ext (mem_dom f)
/-- Evaluate a partial function -/
def fn (f : α →. β) (a : α) : Dom f a → β :=
(f a).get
@[simp]
theorem fn_apply (f : α →. β) (a : α) : f.fn a = (f a).get :=
rfl
/-- Evaluate a partial function to return an `Option` -/
def evalOpt (f : α →. β) [D : DecidablePred (· ∈ Dom f)] (x : α) : Option β :=
@Part.toOption _ _ (D x)
/-- Partial function extensionality -/
theorem ext' {f g : α →. β} (H1 : ∀ a, a ∈ Dom f ↔ a ∈ Dom g) (H2 : ∀ a p q, f.fn a p = g.fn a q) :
f = g :=
funext fun a => Part.ext' (H1 a) (H2 a)
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →. β} (H : ∀ a b, b ∈ f a ↔ b ∈ g a) : f = g :=
funext fun a => Part.ext (H a)
/-- Turns a partial function into a function out of its domain. -/
def asSubtype (f : α →. β) (s : f.Dom) : β :=
f.fn s s.2
/-- The type of partial functions `α →. β` is equivalent to
the type of pairs `(p : α → Prop, f : Subtype p → β)`. -/
def equivSubtype : (α →. β) ≃ Σp : α → Prop, Subtype p → β :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).Dom, asSubtype f⟩, fun f x => ⟨f.1 x, fun h => f.2 ⟨x, h⟩⟩, fun _ =>
funext fun _ => Part.eta _, fun ⟨p, f⟩ => by dsimp; congr⟩
theorem asSubtype_eq_of_mem {f : α →. β} {x : α} {y : β} (fxy : y ∈ f x) (domx : x ∈ f.Dom) :
f.asSubtype ⟨x, domx⟩ = y :=
Part.mem_unique (Part.get_mem _) fxy
/-- Turn a total function into a partial function. -/
@[coe]
protected def lift (f : α → β) : α →. β := fun a => Part.some (f a)
instance coe : Coe (α → β) (α →. β) :=
⟨PFun.lift⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_val (f : α → β) (a : α) : (f : α →. β) a = Part.some (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dom_coe (f : α → β) : (f : α →. β).Dom = Set.univ :=
rfl
theorem lift_injective : Injective (PFun.lift : (α → β) → α →. β) := fun _ _ h =>
funext fun a => Part.some_injective <| congr_fun h a
/-- Graph of a partial function `f` as the set of pairs `(x, f x)` where `x` is in the domain of
`f`. -/
def graph (f : α →. β) : Set (α × β) :=
{ p | p.2 ∈ f p.1 }
/-- Graph of a partial function as a relation. `x` and `y` are related iff `f x` is defined and
"equals" `y`. -/
def graph' (f : α →. β) : Rel α β := fun x y => y ∈ f x
/-- The range of a partial function is the set of values
`f x` where `x` is in the domain of `f`. -/
def ran (f : α →. β) : Set β :=
{ b | ∃ a, b ∈ f a }
/-- Restrict a partial function to a smaller domain. -/
def restrict (f : α →. β) {p : Set α} (H : p ⊆ f.Dom) : α →. β := fun x =>
(f x).restrict (x ∈ p) (@H x)
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict {f : α →. β} {s : Set α} (h : s ⊆ f.Dom) (a : α) (b : β) :
b ∈ f.restrict h a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ f a := by simp [restrict]
/-- Turns a function into a partial function with a prescribed domain. -/
def res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : α →. β :=
(PFun.lift f).restrict s.subset_univ
theorem mem_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (a : α) (b : β) : b ∈ res f s a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
simp [res, @eq_comm _ b]
theorem res_univ (f : α → β) : PFun.res f Set.univ = f :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_graph (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ f.Dom ↔ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ f.graph :=
Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem lift_graph {f : α → β} {a b} : (a, b) ∈ (f : α →. β).graph ↔ f a = b :=
show (∃ _ : True, f a = b) ↔ f a = b by simp
/-- The monad `pure` function, the total constant `x` function -/
protected def pure (x : β) : α →. β := fun _ => Part.some x
/-- The monad `bind` function, pointwise `Part.bind` -/
def bind (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) : α →. γ := fun a => (f a).bind fun b => g b a
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) (a : α) : f.bind g a = (f a).bind fun b => g b a :=
rfl
/-- The monad `map` function, pointwise `Part.map` -/
def map (f : β → γ) (g : α →. β) : α →. γ := fun a => (g a).map f
instance monad : Monad (PFun α) where
pure := PFun.pure
bind := PFun.bind
map := PFun.map
instance lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad (PFun α) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(bind_pure_comp := fun _ _ => funext fun _ => Part.bind_some_eq_map _ _)
(id_map := fun f => by funext a; dsimp [Functor.map, PFun.map]; cases f a; rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => funext fun _ => Part.bind_some _ (f x))
(bind_assoc := fun f g k => funext fun a => (f a).bind_assoc (fun b => g b a) fun b => k b a)
theorem pure_defined (p : Set α) (x : β) : p ⊆ (@PFun.pure α _ x).Dom :=
p.subset_univ
theorem bind_defined {α β γ} (p : Set α) {f : α →. β} {g : β → α →. γ} (H1 : p ⊆ f.Dom)
(H2 : ∀ x, p ⊆ (g x).Dom) : p ⊆ (f >>= g).Dom := fun a ha =>
(⟨H1 ha, H2 _ ha⟩ : (f >>= g).Dom a)
/-- First return map. Transforms a partial function `f : α →. β ⊕ α` into the partial function
`α →. β` which sends `a : α` to the first value in `β` it hits by iterating `f`, if such a value
exists. By abusing notation to illustrate, either `f a` is in the `β` part of `β ⊕ α` (in which
case `f.fix a` returns `f a`), or it is undefined (in which case `f.fix a` is undefined as well), or
it is in the `α` part of `β ⊕ α` (in which case we repeat the procedure, so `f.fix a` will return
`f.fix (f a)`). -/
def fix (f : α →. β ⊕ α) : α →. β := fun a =>
Part.assert (Acc (fun x y => Sum.inr x ∈ f y) a) fun h =>
WellFounded.fixF
(fun a IH =>
Part.assert (f a).Dom fun hf =>
match e : (f a).get hf with
| Sum.inl b => Part.some b
| Sum.inr a' => IH a' ⟨hf, e⟩)
a h
theorem dom_of_mem_fix {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a : α} {b : β} (h : b ∈ f.fix a) : (f a).Dom := by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h
rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq] at h₂; exact h₂.fst.fst
theorem mem_fix_iff {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a : α} {b : β} :
b ∈ f.fix a ↔ Sum.inl b ∈ f a ∨ ∃ a', Sum.inr a' ∈ f a ∧ b ∈ f.fix a' :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h
rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq] at h₂
simp only [Part.mem_assert_iff] at h₂
obtain ⟨h₂, h₃⟩ := h₂
split at h₃
next e => simp only [Part.mem_some_iff] at h₃; subst b; exact Or.inl ⟨h₂, e⟩
next e => exact Or.inr ⟨_, ⟨_, e⟩, Part.mem_assert _ h₃⟩,
fun h => by
simp only [fix, Part.mem_assert_iff]
rcases h with (⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨a', h, h₃⟩)
· refine ⟨⟨_, fun y h' => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· injection Part.mem_unique ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h'
· rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq]
-- Porting note: used to be simp [h₁, h₂]
apply Part.mem_assert h₁
split
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e with h; simp [h]
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e
· simp only [fix, Part.mem_assert_iff] at h₃
obtain ⟨h₃, h₄⟩ := h₃
refine ⟨⟨_, fun y h' => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· injection Part.mem_unique h h' with e
exact e ▸ h₃
· obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h
rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq]
-- Porting note: used to be simp [h₁, h₂, h₄]
apply Part.mem_assert h₁
split
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e; subst a'; exact h₄⟩
/-- If advancing one step from `a` leads to `b : β`, then `f.fix a = b` -/
theorem fix_stop {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (hb : Sum.inl b ∈ f a) : b ∈ f.fix a := by
rw [PFun.mem_fix_iff]
exact Or.inl hb
/-- If advancing one step from `a` on `f` leads to `a' : α`, then `f.fix a = f.fix a'` -/
theorem fix_fwd_eq {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a a' : α} (ha' : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a) : f.fix a = f.fix a' := by
ext b; constructor
· intro h
obtain h' | ⟨a, h', e'⟩ := mem_fix_iff.1 h <;> cases Part.mem_unique ha' h'
exact e'
· intro h
rw [PFun.mem_fix_iff]
exact Or.inr ⟨a', ha', h⟩
theorem fix_fwd {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a a' : α} (hb : b ∈ f.fix a) (ha' : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a) :
b ∈ f.fix a' := by rwa [← fix_fwd_eq ha']
/-- A recursion principle for `PFun.fix`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def fixInduction {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(H : ∀ a', b ∈ f.fix a' → (∀ a'', Sum.inr a'' ∈ f a' → C a'') → C a') : C a := by
have h₂ := (Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h).snd
generalize_proofs at h₂
clear h
induction ‹Acc _ _› with | intro a ha IH => _
have h : b ∈ f.fix a := Part.mem_assert_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h₂⟩
exact H a h fun a' fa' => IH a' fa' (Part.mem_assert_iff.1 (fix_fwd h fa')).snd
theorem fixInduction_spec {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(H : ∀ a', b ∈ f.fix a' → (∀ a'', Sum.inr a'' ∈ f a' → C a'') → C a') :
@fixInduction _ _ C _ _ _ h H = H a h fun _ h' => fixInduction (fix_fwd h h') H := by
unfold fixInduction
generalize_proofs
induction ‹Acc _ _›
rfl
/-- Another induction lemma for `b ∈ f.fix a` which allows one to prove a predicate `P` holds for
`a` given that `f a` inherits `P` from `a` and `P` holds for preimages of `b`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
def fixInduction' {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α}
(h : b ∈ f.fix a) (hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) : C a := by
refine fixInduction h fun a' h ih => ?_
rcases e : (f a').get (dom_of_mem_fix h) with b' | a'' <;> replace e : _ ∈ f a' := ⟨_, e⟩
· apply hbase
convert e
exact Part.mem_unique h (fix_stop e)
· exact hind _ _ (fix_fwd h e) e (ih _ e)
theorem fixInduction'_stop {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(fa : Sum.inl b ∈ f a) (hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) :
@fixInduction' _ _ C _ _ _ h hbase hind = hbase a fa := by
unfold fixInduction'
rw [fixInduction_spec]
-- Porting note: the explicit motive required because `simp` does not apply `Part.get_eq_of_mem`
refine Eq.rec (motive := fun x e ↦
Sum.casesOn x ?_ ?_ (Eq.trans (Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)) e) = hbase a fa) ?_
(Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)).symm
simp
theorem fixInduction'_fwd {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a a' : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(h' : b ∈ f.fix a') (fa : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a)
(hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) :
@fixInduction' _ _ C _ _ _ h hbase hind = hind a a' h' fa (fixInduction' h' hbase hind) := by
unfold fixInduction'
rw [fixInduction_spec]
-- Porting note: the explicit motive required because `simp` does not apply `Part.get_eq_of_mem`
refine Eq.rec (motive := fun x e =>
Sum.casesOn (motive := fun y => (f a).get (dom_of_mem_fix h) = y → C a) x ?_ ?_
(Eq.trans (Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)) e) = _) ?_
(Part.get_eq_of_mem fa (dom_of_mem_fix h)).symm
simp
variable (f : α →. β)
/-- Image of a set under a partial function. -/
def image (s : Set α) : Set β :=
f.graph'.image s
theorem image_def (s : Set α) : f.image s = { y | ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x } :=
rfl
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ f.image s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.image s ⊆ f.image t :=
Rel.image_mono _ h
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : f.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ f.image s ∩ f.image t :=
Rel.image_inter _ s t
theorem image_union (s t : Set α) : f.image (s ∪ t) = f.image s ∪ f.image t :=
Rel.image_union _ s t
/-- Preimage of a set under a partial function. -/
def preimage (s : Set β) : Set α :=
Rel.image (fun x y => x ∈ f y) s
theorem Preimage_def (s : Set β) : f.preimage s = { x | ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_preimage (s : Set β) (x : α) : x ∈ f.preimage s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_subset_dom (s : Set β) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.Dom := fun _ ⟨y, _, fxy⟩ =>
Part.dom_iff_mem.mpr ⟨y, fxy⟩
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.preimage t :=
Rel.preimage_mono _ h
theorem preimage_inter (s t : Set β) : f.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ f.preimage s ∩ f.preimage t :=
Rel.preimage_inter _ s t
theorem preimage_union (s t : Set β) : f.preimage (s ∪ t) = f.preimage s ∪ f.preimage t :=
Rel.preimage_union _ s t
theorem preimage_univ : f.preimage Set.univ = f.Dom := by ext; simp [mem_preimage, mem_dom]
theorem coe_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : (f : α →. β).preimage s = f ⁻¹' s := by ext; simp
/-- Core of a set `s : Set β` with respect to a partial function `f : α →. β`. Set of all `a : α`
such that `f a ∈ s`, if `f a` is defined. -/
def core (s : Set β) : Set α :=
f.graph'.core s
theorem core_def (s : Set β) : f.core s = { x | ∀ y, y ∈ f x → y ∈ s } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_core (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ f.core s ↔ ∀ y, y ∈ f x → y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_dom_subset_core (s : Set β) : f.Domᶜ ⊆ f.core s := fun x hx y fxy =>
absurd ((mem_dom f x).mpr ⟨y, fxy⟩) hx
theorem core_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f.core s ⊆ f.core t :=
Rel.core_mono _ h
theorem core_inter (s t : Set β) : f.core (s ∩ t) = f.core s ∩ f.core t :=
Rel.core_inter _ s t
theorem mem_core_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (x : α) :
x ∈ (res f s).core t ↔ x ∈ s → f x ∈ t := by simp [mem_core, mem_res]
theorem core_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : (res f s).core t = sᶜ ∪ f ⁻¹' t := by
ext x
rw [mem_core_res]
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h]
theorem core_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : (f : α →. β).core s = s.preimage f := by
ext x; simp [core_def]
theorem preimage_subset_core (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) : f.preimage s ⊆ f.core s :=
fun _ ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ y' fxy' =>
have : y = y' := Part.mem_unique fxy fxy'
this ▸ ys
theorem preimage_eq (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) : f.preimage s = f.core s ∩ f.Dom :=
Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset (Set.subset_inter (f.preimage_subset_core s) (f.preimage_subset_dom s))
fun x ⟨xcore, xdom⟩ =>
let y := (f x).get xdom
have ys : y ∈ s := xcore _ (Part.get_mem _)
show x ∈ f.preimage s from ⟨(f x).get xdom, ys, Part.get_mem _⟩
theorem core_eq (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) : f.core s = f.preimage s ∪ f.Domᶜ := by
rw [preimage_eq, Set.inter_union_distrib_right, Set.union_comm (Dom f), Set.compl_union_self,
Set.inter_univ, Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right (f.compl_dom_subset_core s)]
theorem preimage_asSubtype (f : α →. β) (s : Set β) :
f.asSubtype ⁻¹' s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' f.preimage s := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_setOf_eq, PFun.asSubtype, PFun.mem_preimage]
show f.fn x.val _ ∈ s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ∈ f x.val
exact
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨_, h, Part.get_mem _⟩) fun ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ =>
have : f.fn x.val x.property ∈ f x.val := Part.get_mem _
Part.mem_unique fxy this ▸ ys
/-- Turns a function into a partial function to a subtype. -/
def toSubtype (p : β → Prop) (f : α → β) : α →. Subtype p := fun a => ⟨p (f a), Subtype.mk _⟩
@[simp]
theorem dom_toSubtype (p : β → Prop) (f : α → β) : (toSubtype p f).Dom = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubtype_apply (p : β → Prop) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
toSubtype p f a = ⟨p (f a), Subtype.mk _⟩ :=
rfl
theorem dom_toSubtype_apply_iff {p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} {a : α} :
(toSubtype p f a).Dom ↔ p (f a) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_toSubtype_iff {p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : Subtype p} :
b ∈ toSubtype p f a ↔ ↑b = f a := by
rw [toSubtype_apply, Part.mem_mk_iff, exists_subtype_mk_eq_iff, eq_comm]
/-- The identity as a partial function -/
protected def id (α : Type*) : α →. α :=
Part.some
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id (α : Type*) : ((id : α → α) : α →. α) = PFun.id α :=
rfl
@[simp]
| theorem id_apply (a : α) : PFun.id α a = Part.some a :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/PFun.lean | 480 | 481 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Embeddings
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.RingHom.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Torsion
/-!
# Units of a number field
We prove some basic results on the group `(𝓞 K)ˣ` of units of the ring of integers `𝓞 K` of a number
field `K` and its torsion subgroup.
## Main definition
* `NumberField.Units.torsion`: the torsion subgroup of a number field.
## Main results
* `NumberField.isUnit_iff_norm`: an algebraic integer `x : 𝓞 K` is a unit if and only if
`|norm ℚ x| = 1`.
* `NumberField.Units.mem_torsion`: a unit `x : (𝓞 K)ˣ` is torsion iff `w x = 1` for all infinite
places `w` of `K`.
## Tags
number field, units
-/
open scoped NumberField
noncomputable section
open NumberField Units
section Rat
| theorem Rat.RingOfIntegers.isUnit_iff {x : 𝓞 ℚ} : IsUnit x ↔ (x : ℚ) = 1 ∨ (x : ℚ) = -1 := by
simp_rw [(isUnit_map_iff (Rat.ringOfIntegersEquiv : 𝓞 ℚ →+* ℤ) x).symm, Int.isUnit_iff,
RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, RingEquiv.map_eq_one_iff, RingEquiv.map_eq_neg_one_iff, ←
Subtype.coe_injective.eq_iff]; rfl
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Units/Basic.lean | 40 | 43 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule.Basic
/-!
# Maschke's theorem
We prove **Maschke's theorem** for finite groups,
in the formulation that every submodule of a `k[G]` module has a complement,
when `k` is a field with `Fintype.card G` invertible in `k`.
We do the core computation in greater generality.
For any commutative ring `k` in which `Fintype.card G` is invertible,
and a `k[G]`-linear map `i : V → W` which admits a `k`-linear retraction `π`,
we produce a `k[G]`-linear retraction by
taking the average over `G` of the conjugates of `π`.
## Implementation Notes
* These results assume `IsUnit (Fintype.card G : k)` which is equivalent to the more
familiar `¬(ringChar k ∣ Fintype.card G)`.
## Future work
It's not so far to give the usual statement, that every finite dimensional representation
of a finite group is semisimple (i.e. a direct sum of irreducibles).
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Module MonoidAlgebra
/-!
We now do the key calculation in Maschke's theorem.
Given `V → W`, an inclusion of `k[G]` modules,
assume we have some retraction `π` (i.e. `∀ v, π (i v) = v`),
just as a `k`-linear map.
(When `k` is a field, this will be available cheaply, by choosing a basis.)
We now construct a retraction of the inclusion as a `k[G]`-linear map,
by the formula
$$ \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} g⁻¹ • π(g • -). $$
-/
namespace LinearMap
-- At first we work with any `[CommRing k]`, and add the assumption that
-- `IsUnit (Fintype.card G : k)` when it is required.
variable {k : Type u} [CommRing k] {G : Type u} [Group G]
variable {V : Type v} [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable {W : Type w} [AddCommGroup W] [Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
variable [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
variable (π : W →ₗ[k] V)
/-- We define the conjugate of `π` by `g`, as a `k`-linear map. -/
def conjugate (g : G) : W →ₗ[k] V :=
GroupSMul.linearMap k V g⁻¹ ∘ₗ π ∘ₗ GroupSMul.linearMap k W g
theorem conjugate_apply (g : G) (v : W) :
π.conjugate g v = MonoidAlgebra.single g⁻¹ (1 : k) • π (MonoidAlgebra.single g (1 : k) • v) :=
rfl
variable (i : V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W)
section
theorem conjugate_i (h : ∀ v : V, π (i v) = v) (g : G) (v : V) :
(conjugate π g : W → V) (i v) = v := by
rw [conjugate_apply, ← i.map_smul, h, ← mul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_one, inv_mul_cancel,
← one_def, one_smul]
end
variable (G) [Fintype G]
/-- The sum of the conjugates of `π` by each element `g : G`, as a `k`-linear map.
(We postpone dividing by the size of the group as long as possible.)
-/
def sumOfConjugates : W →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ g : G, π.conjugate g
lemma sumOfConjugates_apply (v : W) : π.sumOfConjugates G v = ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v :=
LinearMap.sum_apply _ _ _
/-- In fact, the sum over `g : G` of the conjugate of `π` by `g` is a `k[G]`-linear map.
-/
def sumOfConjugatesEquivariant : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V :=
MonoidAlgebra.equivariantOfLinearOfComm (π.sumOfConjugates G) fun g v => by
simp only [sumOfConjugates_apply, Finset.smul_sum, conjugate_apply]
refine Fintype.sum_bijective (· * g) (Group.mulRight_bijective g) _ _ fun i ↦ ?_
simp only [smul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left, one_mul]
theorem sumOfConjugatesEquivariant_apply (v : W) :
π.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant G v = ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v :=
π.sumOfConjugates_apply G v
section
/-- We construct our `k[G]`-linear retraction of `i` as
$$ \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} g⁻¹ • π(g • -). $$
-/
def equivariantProjection : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V :=
Ring.inverse (Fintype.card G : k) • π.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant G
theorem equivariantProjection_apply (v : W) :
π.equivariantProjection G v = Ring.inverse (Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v := by
simp only [equivariantProjection, smul_apply, sumOfConjugatesEquivariant_apply]
theorem equivariantProjection_condition (hcard : IsUnit (Fintype.card G : k))
(h : ∀ v : V, π (i v) = v) (v : V) : (π.equivariantProjection G) (i v) = v := by
rw [equivariantProjection_apply]
simp only [conjugate_i π i h]
rw [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul k, smul_smul,
Ring.inverse_mul_cancel _ hcard, one_smul]
end
|
end LinearMap
end
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Maschke.lean | 129 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 870 | 872 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta.Basic
/-!
# Urysohn's lemma
In this file we prove Urysohn's lemma `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed`: for any two disjoint
closed sets `s` and `t` in a normal topological space `X` there exists a continuous function
`f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
We also give versions in a regular locally compact space where one assumes that `s` is compact
and `t` is closed, in `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact`
and `exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact` (the latter providing additionally a function with
compact support).
We write a generic proof so that it applies both to normal spaces and to regular locally
compact spaces.
## Implementation notes
Most paper sources prove Urysohn's lemma using a family of open sets indexed by dyadic rational
numbers on `[0, 1]`. There are many technical difficulties with formalizing this proof (e.g., one
needs to formalize the "dyadic induction", then prove that the resulting family of open sets is
monotone). So, we formalize a slightly different proof.
Let `Urysohns.CU` be the type of pairs `(C, U)` of a closed set `C` and an open set `U` such that
`C ⊆ U`. Since `X` is a normal topological space, for each `c : CU` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u ∧ closure u ⊆ c.U`. We define `c.left` and `c.right` to be `(c.C, u)` and
`(closure u, c.U)`, respectively. Then we define a family of functions
`Urysohns.CU.approx (c : Urysohns.CU) (n : ℕ) : X → ℝ` by recursion on `n`:
* `c.approx 0` is the indicator of `c.Uᶜ`;
* `c.approx (n + 1) x = (c.left.approx n x + c.right.approx n x) / 2`.
For each `x` this is a monotone family of functions that are equal to zero on `c.C` and are equal to
one outside of `c.U`. We also have `c.approx n x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `c`, `n`, and `x`.
Let `Urysohns.CU.lim c` be the supremum (or equivalently, the limit) of `c.approx n`. Then
properties of `Urysohns.CU.approx` immediately imply that
* `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `x`;
* `c.lim` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
* `c.lim x = (c.left.lim x + c.right.lim x) / 2`.
In order to prove that `c.lim` is continuous at `x`, we prove by induction on `n : ℕ` that for `y`
in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `|c.lim y - c.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Induction base follows
from `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]`, `c.lim y ∈ [0, 1]`. For the induction step, consider two cases:
* `x ∈ c.left.U`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `y ∈ c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C`
(hence `c.right.lim x = c.right.lim y = 0`) and `|c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`.
Then
`|c.lim y - c.lim x| = |c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| / 2 ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n / 2 < (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
* otherwise, `x ∉ c.left.right.C`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have
`y ∉ c.left.right.C ⊇ c.left.left.U` (hence `c.left.left.lim x = c.left.left.lim y = 1`),
`|c.left.right.lim y - c.left.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`, and
`|c.right.lim y - c.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Combining these inequalities, the triangle
inequality, and the recurrence formula for `c.lim`, we get
`|c.lim x - c.lim y| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
The actual formalization uses `midpoint ℝ x y` instead of `(x + y) / 2` because we have more API
lemmas about `midpoint`.
## Tags
Urysohn's lemma, normal topological space, locally compact topological space
-/
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
/--
An auxiliary type for the proof of Urysohn's lemma: a pair of a closed set `C` and its open
neighborhood `U`, together with the assumption that `C` and `U` satisfy the property `P C U`.
The latter assumption will make it possible to prove simultaneously both versions of Urysohn's
lemma, in normal spaces (with `P` always true) and in locally compact spaces
(with `P C U = IsCompact C`). We put also in the structure the assumption that, for any such pair,
one may find an intermediate pair in between satisfying `P`,
to avoid carrying it around in the argument.
-/
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Set X → Prop) where
/-- The inner set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected C : Set X
/-- The outer set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected U : Set X
/-- The proof that `C` and `U` satisfy the property `P C U` -/
protected P_C_U : P C U
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
/-- The proof that we can divide `CU` pairs in half -/
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c u → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ (v : Set X), IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P c v ∧ P (closure v) u
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Set X → Prop}
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.left` is the pair `(c.C, u)`. -/
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2.1
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.right` is the pair `(closure u, c.U)`. -/
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
/-- `n`-th approximation to a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that `f = 0` on `c.C` and `f = 1`
outside of `c.U`. -/
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
theorem approx_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∉ c.U) : c.approx n x = 1 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
rw [← mem_compl_iff] at hx
exact indicator_of_mem hx _
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [hx, fun hU => hx <| c.left_U_subset hU]
theorem approx_nonneg (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.approx n x := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv]
refine mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 zero_le_two) (add_nonneg ?_ ?_) <;> apply ihn
theorem approx_le_one (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ 1 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_apply_le' (fun _ => le_rfl) fun _ => zero_le_one
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
have := add_le_add (ihn (left c)) (ihn (right c))
norm_num at this
exact Iff.mpr (div_le_one zero_lt_two) this
theorem bddAbove_range_approx (c : CU P) (x : X) : BddAbove (range fun n => c.approx n x) :=
⟨1, fun _ ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ c.approx_le_one n x⟩
theorem approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C {c₁ c₂ : CU P} (h : c₁.U ⊆ c₂.C) (n₁ n₂ : ℕ) (x : X) :
c₂.approx n₂ x ≤ c₁.approx n₁ x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ c₁.U
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x = 0 := approx_of_mem_C _ _ (h hx)
_ ≤ approx n₁ c₁ x := approx_nonneg _ _ _
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x ≤ 1 := approx_le_one _ _ _
_ = approx n₁ c₁ x := (approx_of_nmem_U _ _ hx).symm
theorem approx_mem_Icc_right_left (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) :
c.approx n x ∈ Icc (c.right.approx n x) (c.left.approx n x) := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
exact ⟨le_rfl, indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (compl_subset_compl.2 c.left_U_subset)
(fun _ => zero_le_one) _⟩
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx, mem_Icc]
refine ⟨midpoint_le_midpoint ?_ (ihn _).1, midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _).2 ?_⟩ <;>
apply approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C
exacts [subset_closure, subset_closure]
theorem approx_le_succ (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ c.approx (n + 1) x := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
simp only [approx, right_U, right_le_midpoint]
exact (approx_mem_Icc_right_left c 0 x).2
| succ n ihn =>
rw [approx, approx]
exact midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _) (ihn _)
theorem approx_mono (c : CU P) (x : X) : Monotone fun n => c.approx n x :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => c.approx_le_succ n x
/-- A continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`;
* `f` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
-/
protected noncomputable def lim (c : CU P) (x : X) : ℝ :=
⨆ n, c.approx n x
theorem tendsto_approx_atTop (c : CU P) (x : X) :
Tendsto (fun n => c.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 <| c.lim x) :=
tendsto_atTop_ciSup (c.approx_mono x) ⟨1, fun _ ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ c.approx_le_one _ _⟩
theorem lim_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (x : X) (h : x ∈ c.C) : c.lim x = 0 := by
simp only [CU.lim, approx_of_mem_C, h, ciSup_const]
theorem disjoint_C_support_lim (c : CU P) : Disjoint c.C (Function.support c.lim) :=
Function.disjoint_support_iff.mpr (fun x hx => lim_of_mem_C c x hx)
theorem lim_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (x : X) (h : x ∉ c.U) : c.lim x = 1 := by
simp only [CU.lim, approx_of_nmem_U c _ h, ciSup_const]
theorem lim_eq_midpoint (c : CU P) (x : X) :
c.lim x = midpoint ℝ (c.left.lim x) (c.right.lim x) := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (c.tendsto_approx_atTop x) ((tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 ?_)
simp only [approx]
exact (c.left.tendsto_approx_atTop x).midpoint (c.right.tendsto_approx_atTop x)
theorem approx_le_lim (c : CU P) (x : X) (n : ℕ) : c.approx n x ≤ c.lim x :=
le_ciSup (c.bddAbove_range_approx x) _
theorem lim_nonneg (c : CU P) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.lim x :=
(c.approx_nonneg 0 x).trans (c.approx_le_lim x 0)
theorem lim_le_one (c : CU P) (x : X) : c.lim x ≤ 1 :=
ciSup_le fun _ => c.approx_le_one _ _
theorem lim_mem_Icc (c : CU P) (x : X) : c.lim x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨c.lim_nonneg x, c.lim_le_one x⟩
/-- Continuity of `Urysohns.CU.lim`. See module docstring for a sketch of the proofs. -/
theorem continuous_lim (c : CU P) : Continuous c.lim := by
obtain ⟨h0, h1234, h1⟩ : 0 < (2⁻¹ : ℝ) ∧ (2⁻¹ : ℝ) < 3 / 4 ∧ (3 / 4 : ℝ) < 1 := by norm_num
refine
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
(Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall_pow (h0.trans h1234) h1).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun n _ => ?_
simp only [Metric.mem_closedBall]
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
filter_upwards with y
rw [pow_zero]
exact Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 (c.lim_mem_Icc _) (c.lim_mem_Icc _)
| succ n ihn =>
by_cases hxl : x ∈ c.left.U
· filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds c.left.open_U hxl, ihn c.left] with _ hyl hyd
rw [pow_succ', c.lim_eq_midpoint, c.lim_eq_midpoint,
c.right.lim_of_mem_C _ (c.left_U_subset_right_C hyl),
c.right.lim_of_mem_C _ (c.left_U_subset_right_C hxl)]
refine (dist_midpoint_midpoint_le _ _ _ _).trans ?_
rw [dist_self, add_zero, div_eq_inv_mul]
gcongr
· replace hxl : x ∈ c.left.right.Cᶜ :=
compl_subset_compl.2 c.left.right.subset hxl
filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_compl_iff.2 c.left.right.closed_C) hxl,
ihn c.left.right, ihn c.right] with y hyl hydl hydr
replace hxl : x ∉ c.left.left.U :=
compl_subset_compl.2 c.left.left_U_subset_right_C hxl
replace hyl : y ∉ c.left.left.U :=
compl_subset_compl.2 c.left.left_U_subset_right_C hyl
simp only [pow_succ, c.lim_eq_midpoint, c.left.lim_eq_midpoint,
c.left.left.lim_of_nmem_U _ hxl, c.left.left.lim_of_nmem_U _ hyl]
refine (dist_midpoint_midpoint_le _ _ _ _).trans ?_
refine (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (add_le_add_right (dist_midpoint_midpoint_le _ _ _ _) _)
zero_le_two).trans ?_
rw [dist_self, zero_add]
set r := (3 / 4 : ℝ) ^ n
calc _ ≤ (r / 2 + r) / 2 := by gcongr
_ = _ := by field_simp; ring
end CU
end Urysohns
/-- Urysohn's lemma: if `s` and `t` are two disjoint closed sets in a normal topological space `X`,
then there exists a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
-/
theorem exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed [NormalSpace X]
{s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t)
(hd : Disjoint s t) : ∃ f : C(X, ℝ), EqOn f 0 s ∧ EqOn f 1 t ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
-- The actual proof is in the code above. Here we just repack it into the expected format.
let P : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun _ _ ↦ True
set c : Urysohns.CU P :=
{ C := s
U := tᶜ
P_C_U := trivial
| closed_C := hs
open_U := ht.isOpen_compl
subset := disjoint_left.1 hd
hP := by
rintro c u c_closed - u_open cu
rcases normal_exists_closure_subset c_closed u_open cu with ⟨v, v_open, cv, hv⟩
exact ⟨v, v_open, cv, hv, trivial, trivial⟩ }
exact ⟨⟨c.lim, c.continuous_lim⟩, c.lim_of_mem_C, fun x hx => c.lim_of_nmem_U _ fun h => h hx,
c.lim_mem_Icc⟩
/-- Urysohn's lemma: if `s` and `t` are two disjoint sets in a regular locally compact topological
space `X`, with `s` compact and `t` closed, then there exists a continuous
function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
-/
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 326 | 343 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Natural number logarithms
This file defines two `ℕ`-valued analogs of the logarithm of `n` with base `b`:
* `log b n`: Lower logarithm, or floor **log**. Greatest `k` such that `b^k ≤ n`.
* `clog b n`: Upper logarithm, or **c**eil **log**. Least `k` such that `n ≤ b^k`.
These are interesting because, for `1 < b`, `Nat.log b` and `Nat.clog b` are respectively right and
left adjoints of `Nat.pow b`. See `pow_le_iff_le_log` and `le_pow_iff_clog_le`.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderTop
namespace Nat
/-! ### Floor logarithm -/
/-- `log b n`, is the logarithm of natural number `n` in base `b`. It returns the largest `k : ℕ`
such that `b^k ≤ n`, so if `b^k = n`, it returns exactly `k`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def log (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b then log b (n / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : n / b < n := div_lt_self ((Nat.zero_lt_one.trans h.2).trans_le h.1) h.2
decreasing_trivial
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 0 ↔ n < b ∨ b ≤ 1 := by
rw [log, dite_eq_right_iff]
simp only [Nat.add_eq_zero_iff, Nat.one_ne_zero, and_false, imp_false, not_and_or, not_le, not_lt]
theorem log_of_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : n < b) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl hb)
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inr hb)
@[simp]
theorem log_pos_iff {b n : ℕ} : 0 < log b n ↔ b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b := by
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, log_eq_zero_iff, not_or, not_lt, not_le]
@[bound]
theorem log_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hbn : b ≤ n) : 0 < log b n :=
log_pos_iff.2 ⟨hbn, hb⟩
theorem log_of_one_lt_of_le {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (hn : b ≤ n) : log b n = log b (n / b) + 1 := by
rw [log]
exact if_pos ⟨hn, h⟩
@[simp] lemma log_zero_left : ∀ n, log 0 n = 0 := log_of_left_le_one <| Nat.zero_le _
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b 0 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (le_total 1 b)
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ n, log 1 n = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b 1 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (lt_or_le _ _)
/-- `pow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. See also `Nat.pow_le_of_le_log` and
`Nat.le_log_of_pow_le` for individual implications under weaker assumptions. -/
theorem pow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
b ^ x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ log b y := by
induction y using Nat.strong_induction_on generalizing x with | h y ih => ?_
cases x with
| zero => dsimp; omega
| succ x =>
rw [log]; split_ifs with h
· have b_pos : 0 < b := lt_of_succ_lt hb
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih (y / b) (div_lt_self
(Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hy) hb) (Nat.div_pos h.1 b_pos).ne', le_div_iff_mul_le b_pos,
pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm]
· exact iff_of_false (fun hby => h ⟨(le_self_pow x.succ_ne_zero _).trans hby, hb⟩)
(not_succ_le_zero _)
theorem lt_pow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x ↔ log b y < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy)
theorem pow_le_of_le_log {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (h : x ≤ log b y) : b ^ x ≤ y := by
refine (le_or_lt b 1).elim (fun hb => ?_) fun hb => (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).2 h
rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.le_zero] at h
rwa [h, Nat.pow_zero, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem le_log_of_pow_le {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ x ≤ y) : x ≤ log b y := by
rcases ne_or_eq y 0 with (hy | rfl)
exacts [(pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).1 h, (h.not_lt (Nat.pow_pos (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb))).elim]
theorem pow_log_le_self (b : ℕ) {x : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
pow_le_of_le_log hx le_rfl
theorem log_lt_of_lt_pow {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x → log b y < x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_le_of_le_log hy)
theorem lt_pow_of_log_lt {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : log b y < x → y < b ^ x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (le_log_of_pow_le hb)
lemma log_lt_self (b : ℕ) {x : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : log b x < x :=
match le_or_lt b 1 with
| .inl h => log_of_left_le_one h x ▸ Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx
| .inr h => log_lt_of_lt_pow hx <| Nat.lt_pow_self h
lemma log_le_self (b x : ℕ) : log b x ≤ x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx]
else (log_lt_self b hx).le
theorem lt_pow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x < b ^ (log b x).succ :=
lt_pow_of_log_lt hb (lt_succ_self _)
theorem log_eq_iff {b m n : ℕ} (h : m ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) :
log b n = m ↔ b ^ m ≤ n ∧ n < b ^ (m + 1) := by
rcases em (1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) with (⟨hb, hn⟩ | hbn)
· rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← pow_le_iff_le_log, ← lt_pow_iff_log_lt,
and_comm] <;> assumption
have hm : m ≠ 0 := h.resolve_right hbn
rw [not_and_or, not_lt, Ne, not_not] at hbn
rcases hbn with (hb | rfl)
· obtain rfl | rfl := le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 hb
any_goals
simp only [ne_eq, zero_eq, reduceSucc, lt_self_iff_false, not_lt_zero, false_and, or_false]
at h
simp [h, eq_comm (a := 0), Nat.zero_pow (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 _)] <;> omega
· simp [@eq_comm _ 0, hm]
theorem log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow {b m n : ℕ} (h₁ : b ^ m ≤ n) (h₂ : n < b ^ (m + 1)) :
log b n = m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· rw [Nat.pow_one] at h₂
exact log_of_lt h₂
· exact (log_eq_iff (Or.inl hm)).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem log_pow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : log b (b ^ x) = x :=
log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow le_rfl (Nat.pow_lt_pow_right hb x.lt_succ_self)
theorem log_eq_one_iff' {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ b ≤ n ∧ n < b * b := by
rw [log_eq_iff (Or.inl Nat.one_ne_zero), Nat.pow_add, Nat.pow_one]
theorem log_eq_one_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ n < b * b ∧ 1 < b ∧ b ≤ n :=
log_eq_one_iff'.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, lt_mul_self_iff.1 (h.1.trans_lt h.2), h.1⟩, fun h => ⟨h.2.2, h.1⟩⟩
theorem log_mul_base {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : log b (n * b) = log b n + 1 := by
apply log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow <;> rw [pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm b]
exacts [Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (pow_log_le_self _ hn),
(Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb)).2 (lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _)]
theorem pow_log_le_add_one (b : ℕ) : ∀ x, b ^ log b x ≤ x + 1
| 0 => by rw [log_zero_right, Nat.pow_zero]
| x + 1 => (pow_log_le_self b x.succ_ne_zero).trans (x + 1).le_succ
theorem log_monotone {b : ℕ} : Monotone (log b) := by
refine monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => ?_
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
· exact le_log_of_pow_le hb (pow_log_le_add_one _ _)
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : log b n ≤ log b m :=
log_monotone h
@[mono]
theorem log_anti_left {b c n : ℕ} (hc : 1 < c) (hb : c ≤ b) : log b n ≤ log c n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · rw [log_zero_right, log_zero_right]
apply le_log_of_pow_le hc
calc
c ^ log b n ≤ b ^ log b n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hb _
_ ≤ n := pow_log_le_self _ hn
theorem log_antitone_left {n : ℕ} : AntitoneOn (fun b => log b n) (Set.Ioi 1) := fun _ hc _ _ hb =>
log_anti_left (Set.mem_Iio.1 hc) hb
@[simp]
theorem log_div_base (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b) = log b n - 1 := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.zero_sub]
rcases lt_or_le n b with h | h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, log_of_lt h, log_zero_right]
rw [log_of_one_lt_of_le hb h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem log_div_mul_self (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b * b) = log b n := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb]
rcases lt_or_le n b with h | h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, Nat.zero_mul, log_zero_right, log_of_lt h]
rw [log_mul_base hb (Nat.div_pos h (by omega)).ne', log_div_base,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_iff.2 <| log_pos hb h)]
theorem add_pred_div_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : (n + b - 1) / b < n := by
rw [div_lt_iff_lt_mul (by omega), ← succ_le_iff, ← pred_eq_sub_one,
succ_pred_eq_of_pos (by omega)]
| exact Nat.add_le_mul hn hb
lemma log2_eq_log_two {n : ℕ} : Nat.log2 n = Nat.log 2 n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· rw [log2_zero, log_zero_right]
apply eq_of_forall_le_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Log.lean | 210 | 215 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
/-!
# Permutations from a list
A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
When there are duplicate elements in `l`, how and in what arrangement with respect to the other
elements they appear in the list determines the formed permutation.
This is because `List.formPerm` is implemented as a product of `Equiv.swap`s.
That means that presence of a sublist of two adjacent duplicates like `[..., x, x, ...]`
will produce the same permutation as if the adjacent duplicates were not present.
The `List.formPerm` definition is meant to primarily be used with `Nodup l`, so that
the resulting permutation is cyclic (if `l` has at least two elements).
The presence of duplicates in a particular placement can lead `List.formPerm` to produce a
nontrivial permutation that is noncyclic.
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section FormPerm
variable [DecidableEq α] (l : List α)
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
/-- A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
-/
def formPerm : Equiv.Perm α :=
(zipWith Equiv.swap l l.tail).prod
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_nil : formPerm ([] : List α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_singleton (x : α) : formPerm [x] = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_cons (x y : α) (l : List α) :
formPerm (x :: y :: l) = swap x y * formPerm (y :: l) :=
prod_cons
theorem formPerm_pair (x y : α) : formPerm [x, y] = swap x y :=
rfl
theorem mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne : ∀ {l l' : List α} {x : α},
(zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x → x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ l'
| [], _, _ => by simp
| _, [], _ => by simp
| a::l, b::l', x => fun hx ↦
if h : (zipWith swap l l').prod x = x then
(eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self (a := a) (b := b) (x := x) (by simpa [h] using hx)).imp
(by rintro rfl; exact .head _) (by rintro rfl; exact .head _)
else
(mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h).imp (.tail _) (.tail _)
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support' (l l' : List α) :
{ x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := fun _ h ↦ by
simpa using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support [Fintype α] (l l' : List α) :
(zipWith swap l l').prod.support ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using zipWith_swap_prod_support' _ _ hx'
theorem support_formPerm_le' : { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset := by
refine (zipWith_swap_prod_support' l l.tail).trans ?_
simpa [Finset.subset_iff] using tail_subset l
theorem support_formPerm_le [Fintype α] : support (formPerm l) ≤ l.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using support_formPerm_le' _ hx'
variable {l} {x : α}
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne (h : l.formPerm x ≠ x) : x ∈ l := by
simpa [or_iff_left_of_imp mem_of_mem_tail] using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
theorem formPerm_apply_of_not_mem (h : x ∉ l) : formPerm l x = x :=
not_imp_comm.1 mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne h
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem (h : x ∈ l) : formPerm l x ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨y, l⟩
· simp at h
induction' l with z l IH generalizing x y
· simpa using h
· by_cases hx : x ∈ z :: l
· rw [formPerm_cons_cons, mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs
· simp [IH _ hx]
· simp
· simp [*]
· replace h : x = y := Or.resolve_right (mem_cons.1 h) hx
simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, ← h]
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem (h : l.formPerm x ∈ l) : x ∈ l := by
contrapose h
rwa [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_mem_iff_mem : l.formPerm x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ l :=
⟨l.mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem, l.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_concat_apply_last (x y : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: (xs ++ [y])) y = x := by
induction' xs with z xs IH generalizing x y
· simp
· simp [IH]
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getLast (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs)) = x := by
induction' xs using List.reverseRecOn with xs y _ generalizing x <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem_length (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) (x :: xs)[xs.length] = x := by
rw [getElem_cons_length rfl, formPerm_apply_getLast]
theorem formPerm_apply_head (x y : α) (xs : List α) (h : Nodup (x :: y :: xs)) :
formPerm (x :: y :: xs) x = y := by simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h.not_mem]
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem_zero (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (hl : 1 < l.length) :
formPerm l l[0] = l[1] := by
rcases l with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hl
· simp at hl
· rw [getElem_cons_zero, formPerm_apply_head _ _ _ h, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero]
variable (l)
theorem formPerm_eq_head_iff_eq_getLast (x y : α) :
formPerm (y :: l) x = y ↔ x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
Iff.trans (by rw [formPerm_apply_getLast]) (formPerm (y :: l)).injective.eq_iff
theorem formPerm_apply_lt_getElem (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n + 1 < xs.length) :
formPerm xs xs[n] = xs[n + 1] := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing xs
· simpa using formPerm_apply_getElem_zero _ h _
· rcases xs with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, l⟩⟩)
· simp at hn
· rw [formPerm_singleton, getElem_singleton, getElem_singleton, one_apply]
· specialize IH (y :: l) h.of_cons _
· simpa [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn
simp only [swap_apply_eq_iff, coe_mul, formPerm_cons_cons, Function.comp]
simp only [getElem_cons_succ] at *
rw [← IH, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
· intro hx
rw [← hx, IH] at h
simp [getElem_mem] at h
theorem formPerm_apply_getElem (xs : List α) (w : Nodup xs) (i : ℕ) (h : i < xs.length) :
formPerm xs xs[i] =
xs[(i + 1) % xs.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨x, xs⟩
· simp at h
· have : i ≤ xs.length := by
refine Nat.le_of_lt_succ ?_
simpa using h
rcases this.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hn')
| · simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_lt_getElem (x :: xs) w _ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hn')]
congr
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/List.lean | 183 | 185 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
/-!
# The von Mangoldt Function
In this file we define the von Mangoldt function: the function on natural numbers that returns
`log p` if the input can be expressed as `p^k` for a prime `p`.
## Main Results
The main definition for this file is
- `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt`: The von Mangoldt function `Λ`.
We then prove the classical summation property of the von Mangoldt function in
`ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_sum`, that `∑ i ∈ n.divisors, Λ i = Real.log n`, and use this
to deduce alternative expressions for the von Mangoldt function via Möbius inversion, see
`ArithmeticFunction.sum_moebius_mul_log_eq`.
## Notation
We use the standard notation `Λ` to represent the von Mangoldt function.
It is accessible in the locales `ArithmeticFunction` (like the notations for other arithmetic
functions) and also in the locale `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt`.
-/
namespace ArithmeticFunction
open Finset Nat
open scoped ArithmeticFunction
/-- `log` as an arithmetic function `ℕ → ℝ`. Note this is in the `ArithmeticFunction`
namespace to indicate that it is bundled as an `ArithmeticFunction` rather than being the usual
real logarithm. -/
noncomputable def log : ArithmeticFunction ℝ :=
⟨fun n => Real.log n, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem log_apply {n : ℕ} : log n = Real.log n :=
rfl
/--
The `vonMangoldt` function is the function on natural numbers that returns `log p` if the input can
be expressed as `p^k` for a prime `p`.
In the case when `n` is a prime power, `Nat.minFac` will give the appropriate prime, as it is the
smallest prime factor.
In the `ArithmeticFunction` locale, we have the notation `Λ` for this function.
This is also available in the `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt` locale, allowing for selective
access to the notation.
-/
noncomputable def vonMangoldt : ArithmeticFunction ℝ :=
⟨fun n => if IsPrimePow n then Real.log (minFac n) else 0, if_neg not_isPrimePow_zero⟩
@[inherit_doc] scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Λ" => ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
@[inherit_doc] scoped[ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt] notation "Λ" =>
ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
theorem vonMangoldt_apply {n : ℕ} : Λ n = if IsPrimePow n then Real.log (minFac n) else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_one : Λ 1 = 0 := by simp [vonMangoldt_apply]
@[simp]
theorem vonMangoldt_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ Λ n := by
rw [vonMangoldt_apply]
split_ifs
· exact Real.log_nonneg (one_le_cast.2 (Nat.minFac_pos n))
rfl
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_pow {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : Λ (n ^ k) = Λ n := by
simp only [vonMangoldt_apply, isPrimePow_pow_iff hk, pow_minFac hk]
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Λ p = Real.log p := by
rw [vonMangoldt_apply, Prime.minFac_eq hp, if_pos hp.prime.isPrimePow]
theorem vonMangoldt_ne_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : Λ n ≠ 0 ↔ IsPrimePow n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 1 with (rfl | hn); · simp [not_isPrimePow_one]
exact (Real.log_pos (one_lt_cast.2 (minFac_prime hn).one_lt)).ne'.ite_ne_right_iff
theorem vonMangoldt_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < Λ n ↔ IsPrimePow n :=
vonMangoldt_nonneg.lt_iff_ne.trans (ne_comm.trans vonMangoldt_ne_zero_iff)
|
theorem vonMangoldt_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : Λ n = 0 ↔ ¬IsPrimePow n :=
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/VonMangoldt.lean | 94 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Dart
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Fintype
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Set
/-!
# Maps between graphs
This file defines two functions and three structures relating graphs.
The structures directly correspond to the classification of functions as
injective, surjective and bijective, and have corresponding notation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.map`: the graph obtained by pushing the adjacency relation through
an injective function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.comap`: the graph obtained by pulling the adjacency relation behind
an arbitrary function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.induce`: the subgraph induced by the given vertex set, a wrapper around `comap`.
* `SimpleGraph.spanningCoe`: the supergraph without any additional edges, a wrapper around `map`.
* `SimpleGraph.Hom`, `G →g H`: a graph homomorphism from `G` to `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Embedding`, `G ↪g H`: a graph embedding of `G` in `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Iso`, `G ≃g H`: a graph isomorphism between `G` and `H`.
Note that a graph embedding is a stronger notion than an injective graph homomorphism,
since its image is an induced subgraph.
## Implementation notes
Morphisms of graphs are abbreviations for `RelHom`, `RelEmbedding` and `RelIso`.
To make use of pre-existing simp lemmas, definitions involving morphisms are
abbreviations as well.
-/
open Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V W X : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) {u v : V}
/-! ## Map and comap -/
/-- Given an injective function, there is a covariant induced map on graphs by pushing forward
the adjacency relation.
This is injective (see `SimpleGraph.map_injective`). -/
protected def map (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : SimpleGraph W where
Adj := Relation.Map G.Adj f f
symm a b := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, rfl⟩
use w, v, h.symm, rfl
loopless a := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, h'⟩
exact h.ne (f.injective h'.symm)
instance instDecidableMapAdj {f : V ↪ W} {a b} [Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)] :
Decidable ((G.map f).Adj a b) := ‹Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)›
@[simp]
theorem map_adj (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (u v : W) :
(G.map f).Adj u v ↔ ∃ u' v' : V, G.Adj u' v' ∧ f u' = u ∧ f v' = v :=
Iff.rfl
lemma map_adj_apply {G : SimpleGraph V} {f : V ↪ W} {a b : V} :
(G.map f).Adj (f a) (f b) ↔ G.Adj a b := by simp
theorem map_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.map f) := by
rintro G G' h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, h ha, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id : G.map (Function.Embedding.refl _) = G :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_id_id _
@[simp] lemma map_map (f : V ↪ W) (g : W ↪ X) : (G.map f).map g = G.map (f.trans g) :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_map _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given a function, there is a contravariant induced map on graphs by pulling back the
adjacency relation.
This is one of the ways of creating induced graphs. See `SimpleGraph.induce` for a wrapper.
This is surjective when `f` is injective (see `SimpleGraph.comap_surjective`). -/
protected def comap (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj u v := G.Adj (f u) (f v)
symm _ _ h := h.symm
loopless _ := G.loopless _
@[simp] lemma comap_adj {G : SimpleGraph W} {f : V → W} :
(G.comap f).Adj u v ↔ G.Adj (f u) (f v) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id {G : SimpleGraph V} : G.comap id = G := SimpleGraph.ext rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_comap {G : SimpleGraph X} (f : V → W) (g : W → X) :
(G.comap g).comap f = G.comap (g ∘ f) := rfl
instance instDecidableComapAdj (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidableRel (G.comap f).Adj := fun _ _ ↦ ‹DecidableRel G.Adj› _ _
lemma comap_symm (G : SimpleGraph V) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.comap e.symm.toEmbedding = G.map e.toEmbedding := by
ext; simp only [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, comap_adj, map_adj, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply,
exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right]
lemma map_symm (G : SimpleGraph W) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.map e.symm.toEmbedding = G.comap e.toEmbedding := by rw [← comap_symm, e.symm_symm]
theorem comap_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.comap f) := by
intro G G' h _ _ ha
exact h ha
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_eq (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : (G.map f).comap f = G := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_comap_map (f : V ↪ W) :
Function.LeftInverse (SimpleGraph.comap f) (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
comap_map_eq f
theorem map_injective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Injective (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
(leftInverse_comap_map f).injective
theorem comap_surjective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Surjective (SimpleGraph.comap f) :=
(leftInverse_comap_map f).surjective
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) :
G.map f ≤ G' ↔ G ≤ G'.comap f :=
⟨fun h _ _ ha => h ⟨_, _, ha, rfl, rfl⟩, by
rintro h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact h ha⟩
theorem map_comap_le (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : (G.comap f).map f ≤ G := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma le_comap_of_subsingleton (f : V → W) [Subsingleton V] : G ≤ G'.comap f := by
intros v w; simp [Subsingleton.elim v w]
lemma map_le_of_subsingleton (f : V ↪ W) [Subsingleton V] : G.map f ≤ G' := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]; apply le_comap_of_subsingleton
/-- Given a family of vertex types indexed by `ι`, pulling back from `⊤ : SimpleGraph ι`
| yields the complete multipartite graph on the family.
Two vertices are adjacent if and only if their indices are not equal. -/
abbrev completeMultipartiteGraph {ι : Type*} (V : ι → Type*) : SimpleGraph (Σ i, V i) :=
SimpleGraph.comap Sigma.fst ⊤
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Maps.lean | 147 | 151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# Measurability of the integral against a kernel
The Bochner integral of a strongly measurable function against a kernel is strongly measurable.
## Main statements
* `MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right`: the function
`a ↦ ∫ b, f a b ∂(κ a)` is measurable, for an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function
`f : α → β → E` such that `uncurry f` is measurable.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Function Set Filter
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{κ : Kernel α β} {η : Kernel β γ} {a : α} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_integrable ⦃f : β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | Integrable f (κ a)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt hf.enorm.lintegral_kernel measurable_const
variable [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {η : Kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η]
theorem ProbabilityTheory.measurableSet_kernel_integrable ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) :
MeasurableSet {x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)} := by
simp_rw [Integrable, hf.of_uncurry_left.aestronglyMeasurable, true_and]
exact measurableSet_lt (Measurable.lintegral_kernel_prod_right hf.enorm) measurable_const
open ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
omit [IsSFiniteKernel κ] in
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel ⦃f : β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x ↦ ∫ y, f y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
have : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc β E := SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let f' n : α → E := {x | Integrable f (κ x)}.indicator fun x ↦ (s n).integral (κ x)
refine stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto (f := f') atTop (fun n ↦ ?_) ?_
· refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_integrable hf)
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun _ _ ↦ ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
exact κ.measurable_coe ((s n).measurableSet_fiber _)
· rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable f (κ x)
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hfx, indicator_of_mem, f']
apply tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset _ hfx
exact subset_rfl
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right ⦃f : α → β → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f x y ∂κ x := by
classical
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, stronglyMeasurable_const]
borelize E
haveI : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0} : Set E) :=
hf.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
let s : ℕ → SimpleFunc (α × β) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hf.measurable (range (uncurry f) ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
let s' : ℕ → α → SimpleFunc β E := fun n x => (s n).comp (Prod.mk x) measurable_prodMk_left
let f' : ℕ → α → E := fun n =>
{x | Integrable (f x) (κ x)}.indicator fun x => (s' n x).integral (κ x)
have hf' : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f' n) := by
intro n; refine StronglyMeasurable.indicator ?_ (measurableSet_kernel_integrable hf)
have : ∀ x, ((s' n x).range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ (s n).range := by
intro x; refine Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.filter_subset _ _) ?_; intro y
simp_rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range]; rintro ⟨z, rfl⟩; exact ⟨(x, z), rfl⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset (this _)]
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun x _ => ?_
refine (Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_).stronglyMeasurable.smul_const _
simp only [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp, preimage_comp]
apply Kernel.measurable_kernel_prodMk_left
exact (s n).measurableSet_fiber x
have h2f' : Tendsto f' atTop (𝓝 fun x : α => ∫ y : β, f x y ∂κ x) := by
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds]; intro x
by_cases hfx : Integrable (f x) (κ x)
· have (n) : Integrable (s' n x) (κ x) := by
apply (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm).mono' (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simp_rw [s', SimpleFunc.coe_comp]; exact SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
simp only [f', hfx, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral _ (this _), indicator_of_mem,
mem_setOf_eq]
refine
tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun y => ‖f x y‖ + ‖f x y‖)
(fun n => (s' n x).aestronglyMeasurable) (hfx.norm.add hfx.norm) ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was
-- exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
-- SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le _ _ (x, y) n
exact fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun y =>
SimpleFunc.norm_approxOn_zero_le hf.measurable (by simp) (x, y) n
· refine Eventually.of_forall fun y => SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf.measurable (by simp) ?_
apply subset_closure
simp [-uncurry_apply_pair]
· simp [f', hfx, integral_undef]
exact stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto _ hf' h2f'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' ⦃f : α × β → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂κ x := by
rw [← uncurry_curry f] at hf
exact hf.integral_kernel_prod_right
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right'' {f : β × γ → E}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun x => ∫ y, (fun u : (α × β) × γ => f (u.1.2, u.2)) (x, y) ∂η x) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_right' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.snd.prodMk measurable_snd))
simpa using this
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left ⦃f : β → α → E⦄
(hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) : StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f x y ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' ⦃f : β × α → E⦄ (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂κ y :=
(hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap).integral_kernel_prod_right'
theorem StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left'' {f : γ × β → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun y => ∫ x, f (x, y) ∂η (a, y) := by
change
StronglyMeasurable
((fun y => ∫ x, (fun u : γ × α × β => f (u.1, u.2.2)) (x, y) ∂η y) ∘ fun x => (a, x))
apply StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable _ (measurable_prodMk_left (m := mα))
· have := MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_prod_left' (κ := η)
(hf.comp_measurable (measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_snd.snd))
simpa using this
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/MeasurableIntegral.lean | 184 | 189 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
/-!
# Quotient category
Constructs the quotient of a category by an arbitrary family of relations on its hom-sets,
by introducing a type synonym for the objects, and identifying homs as necessary.
This is analogous to 'the quotient of a group by the normal closure of a subset', rather
than 'the quotient of a group by a normal subgroup'. When taking the quotient by a congruence
relation, `functor_map_eq_iff` says that no unnecessary identifications have been made.
-/
/-- A `HomRel` on `C` consists of a relation on every hom-set. -/
def HomRel (C) [Quiver C] :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄, (X ⟶ Y) → (X ⟶ Y) → Prop
-- The `Inhabited` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance (C) [Quiver C] : Inhabited (HomRel C) where
default := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ PUnit
namespace CategoryTheory
section
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A functor induces a `HomRel` on its domain, relating those maps that have the same image. -/
def Functor.homRel : HomRel C :=
fun _ _ f g ↦ F.map f = F.map g
@[simp]
lemma Functor.homRel_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
F.homRel f g ↔ F.map f = F.map g := Iff.rfl
end
variable {C : Type _} [Category C] (r : HomRel C)
/-- A `HomRel` is a congruence when it's an equivalence on every hom-set, and it can be composed
from left and right. -/
class Congruence : Prop where
/-- `r` is an equivalence on every hom-set. -/
equivalence : ∀ {X Y}, _root_.Equivalence (@r X Y)
/-- Precomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compLeft : ∀ {X Y Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g g' : Y ⟶ Z}, r g g' → r (f ≫ g) (f ≫ g')
/-- Postcomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compRight : ∀ {X Y Z} {f f' : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z), r f f' → r (f ≫ g) (f' ≫ g)
/-- For `F : C ⥤ D`, `F.homRel` is a congruence. -/
instance Functor.congruence_homRel {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D) :
Congruence F.homRel where
equivalence :=
{ refl := fun _ ↦ rfl
symm := by aesop
trans := by aesop }
compLeft := by aesop
compRight := by aesop
/-- A type synonym for `C`, thought of as the objects of the quotient category. -/
@[ext]
structure Quotient (r : HomRel C) where
/-- The object of `C`. -/
as : C
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Quotient r) :=
⟨{ as := default }⟩
namespace Quotient
/-- Generates the closure of a family of relations w.r.t. composition from left and right. -/
inductive CompClosure (r : HomRel C) ⦃s t : C⦄ : (s ⟶ t) → (s ⟶ t) → Prop
| intro {a b : C} (f : s ⟶ a) (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ t) (h : r m₁ m₂) :
CompClosure r (f ≫ m₁ ≫ g) (f ≫ m₂ ≫ g)
theorem CompClosure.of {a b : C} (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (h : r m₁ m₂) : CompClosure r m₁ m₂ := by
simpa using CompClosure.intro (𝟙 _) m₁ m₂ (𝟙 _) h
theorem comp_left {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
∀ (g₁ g₂ : b ⟶ c) (_ : CompClosure r g₁ g₂), CompClosure r (f ≫ g₁) (f ≫ g₂)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro (f ≫ x) m₁ m₂ y h
theorem comp_right {a b c : C} (g : b ⟶ c) :
∀ (f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b) (_ : CompClosure r f₁ f₂), CompClosure r (f₁ ≫ g) (f₂ ≫ g)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro x m₁ m₂ (y ≫ g) h
/-- Hom-sets of the quotient category. -/
def Hom (s t : Quotient r) :=
Quot <| @CompClosure C _ r s.as t.as
instance (a : Quotient r) : Inhabited (Hom r a a) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)⟩
/-- Composition in the quotient category. -/
def comp ⦃a b c : Quotient r⦄ : Hom r a b → Hom r b c → Hom r a c := fun hf hg ↦
Quot.liftOn hf
(fun f ↦
Quot.liftOn hg (fun g ↦ Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g)) fun g₁ g₂ h ↦
Quot.sound <| comp_left r f g₁ g₂ h)
fun f₁ f₂ h ↦ Quot.inductionOn hg fun g ↦ Quot.sound <| comp_right r g f₁ f₂ h
@[simp]
theorem comp_mk {a b c : Quotient r} (f : a.as ⟶ b.as) (g : b.as ⟶ c.as) :
comp r (Quot.mk _ f) (Quot.mk _ g) = Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
-- Porting note: Had to manually add the proofs of `comp_id` `id_comp` and `assoc`
instance category : Category (Quotient r) where
Hom := Hom r
id a := Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)
comp := @comp _ _ r
comp_id f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
id_comp f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
assoc f g h := Quot.inductionOn f <| Quot.inductionOn g <| Quot.inductionOn h <| by simp
/-- The functor from a category to its quotient. -/
def functor : C ⥤ Quotient r where
obj a := { as := a }
map := @fun _ _ f ↦ Quot.mk _ f
instance full_functor : (functor r).Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨Quot.out f, by simp [functor]⟩
instance essSurj_functor : (functor r).EssSurj where
mem_essImage Y :=
⟨Y.as, ⟨eqToIso (by
ext
rfl)⟩⟩
protected theorem induction {P : ∀ {a b : Quotient r}, (a ⟶ b) → Prop}
(h : ∀ {x y : C} (f : x ⟶ y), P ((functor r).map f)) :
∀ {a b : Quotient r} (f : a ⟶ b), P f := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨f⟩
exact h f
protected theorem sound {a b : C} {f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b} (h : r f₁ f₂) :
(functor r).map f₁ = (functor r).map f₂ := by
simpa using Quot.sound (CompClosure.intro (𝟙 a) f₁ f₂ (𝟙 b) h)
lemma compClosure_iff_self [h : Congruence r] {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
CompClosure r f g ↔ r f g := by
constructor
· intro hfg
induction' hfg with m m' hm
exact Congruence.compLeft _ (Congruence.compRight _ (by assumption))
· exact CompClosure.of _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem compClosure_eq_self [h : Congruence r] :
CompClosure r = r := by
ext
simp only [compClosure_iff_self]
theorem functor_map_eq_iff [h : Congruence r] {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
(functor r).map f = (functor r).map f' ↔ r f f' := by
dsimp [functor]
rw [Equivalence.quot_mk_eq_iff, compClosure_eq_self r]
simpa only [compClosure_eq_self r] using h.equivalence
theorem functor_homRel_eq_compClosure_eqvGen {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
(functor r).homRel f g ↔ Relation.EqvGen (@CompClosure C _ r X Y) f g :=
Quot.eq
theorem compClosure.congruence :
Congruence fun X Y => Relation.EqvGen (@CompClosure C _ r X Y) := by
convert inferInstanceAs (Congruence (functor r).homRel)
ext
rw [functor_homRel_eq_compClosure_eqvGen]
variable {D : Type _} [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- The induced functor on the quotient category. -/
def lift (H : ∀ (x y : C) (f₁ f₂ : x ⟶ y), r f₁ f₂ → F.map f₁ = F.map f₂) : Quotient r ⥤ D where
obj a := F.obj a.as
map := @fun a b hf ↦
Quot.liftOn hf (fun f ↦ F.map f)
(by
| rintro _ _ ⟨_, _, _, _, h⟩
simp [H _ _ _ _ h])
map_id a := F.map_id a.as
map_comp := by
rintro a b c ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩
exact F.map_comp f g
variable (H : ∀ (x y : C) (f₁ f₂ : x ⟶ y), r f₁ f₂ → F.map f₁ = F.map f₂)
theorem lift_spec : functor r ⋙ lift r F H = F := by
apply Functor.ext; rotate_left
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Quotient.lean | 186 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 . All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
/-!
# p-groups
This file contains a proof that if `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`,
then the number of fixed points of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α`.
It also contains proofs of some corollaries of this lemma about existence of fixed points.
-/
open Fintype MulAction
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- A p-group is a group in which every element has prime power order -/
def IsPGroup : Prop :=
∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, g ^ p ^ k = 1
variable {p} {G}
namespace IsPGroup
theorem iff_orderOf [hp : Fact p.Prime] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ k :=
forall_congr' fun g =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hk⟩ =>
Exists.imp (fun _ h => h.right)
((Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)),
Exists.imp fun k hk => by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
theorem of_card {n : ℕ} (hG : Nat.card G = p ^ n) : IsPGroup p G := fun g =>
⟨n, by rw [← hG, pow_card_eq_one']⟩
theorem of_bot : IsPGroup p (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
of_card (n := 0) (by rw [Subgroup.card_bot, pow_zero])
theorem iff_card [Fact p.Prime] [Finite G] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, Nat.card G = p ^ n := by
have hG : Nat.card G ≠ 0 := Nat.card_pos.ne'
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => of_card hn⟩
suffices ∀ q ∈ (Nat.card G).primeFactorsList, q = p by
use (Nat.card G).primeFactorsList.length
rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← List.eq_replicate_of_mem this, Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hG]
intro q hq
obtain ⟨hq1, hq2⟩ := (Nat.mem_primeFactorsList hG).mp hq
haveI : Fact q.Prime := ⟨hq1⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card' q hq2
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (iff_orderOf.mp h) g
exact (hq1.pow_eq_iff.mp (hg.symm.trans hk).symm).1.symm
alias ⟨exists_card_eq, _⟩ := iff_card
section GIsPGroup
variable (hG : IsPGroup p G)
include hG
theorem of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : H →* G) (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
simp_rw [IsPGroup, ← hϕ.eq_iff, ϕ.map_pow, ϕ.map_one]
exact fun h => hG (ϕ h)
theorem to_subgroup (H : Subgroup G) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective
theorem of_surjective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G →* H) (hϕ : Function.Surjective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
refine fun h => Exists.elim (hϕ h) fun g hg => Exists.imp (fun k hk => ?_) (hG g)
rw [← hg, ← ϕ.map_pow, hk, ϕ.map_one]
theorem to_quotient (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : IsPGroup p (G ⧸ H) :=
hG.of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk' H) Quotient.mk''_surjective
theorem of_equiv {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G ≃* H) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_surjective ϕ.toMonoidHom ϕ.surjective
theorem orderOf_coprime {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : (orderOf g).Coprime n :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG g
(hn.pow_left k).coprime_dvd_left (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)
/-- If `gcd(p,n) = 1`, then the `n`th power map is a bijection. -/
noncomputable def powEquiv {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) : G ≃ G :=
let h : ∀ g : G, (Nat.card (Subgroup.zpowers g)).Coprime n := fun g =>
(Nat.card_zpowers g).symm ▸ hG.orderOf_coprime hn g
{ toFun := (· ^ n)
invFun := fun g => (powCoprime (h g)).symm ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩
left_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <|
(powCoprime (h (g ^ n))).left_inv
⟨g, _, Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).left_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩⟩
right_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).right_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : hG.powEquiv hn g = g ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_symm_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) :
(hG.powEquiv hn).symm g = g ^ (orderOf g).gcdB n := by rw [← Nat.card_zpowers]; rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- If `p ∤ n`, then the `n`th power map is a bijection. -/
noncomputable abbrev powEquiv' {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : G ≃ G :=
powEquiv hG (hp.out.coprime_iff_not_dvd.mpr hn)
theorem index (H : Subgroup G) [H.FiniteIndex] : ∃ n : ℕ, H.index = p ^ n := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp (hG.to_quotient H.normalCore)
obtain ⟨k, _, hk2⟩ :=
(Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ (H.normalCore.index_eq_card.trans hn)).mp
(Subgroup.index_dvd_of_le H.normalCore_le))
exact ⟨k, hk2⟩
theorem card_eq_or_dvd : Nat.card G = 1 ∨ p ∣ Nat.card G := by
cases finite_or_infinite G
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp hG
rw [hn]
rcases n with - | n
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨p ^ n, by rw [pow_succ']⟩
· rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
exact Or.inr ⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_card [Finite G] : Nontrivial G ↔ ∃ n > 0, Nat.card G = p ^ n :=
⟨fun hGnt =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := iff_card.1 hG
⟨k,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hk0 => by
rw [hk0, pow_zero] at hk; exact Finite.one_lt_card.ne' hk,
hk⟩,
fun ⟨_, hk0, hk⟩ =>
Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 <|
hk.symm ▸ one_lt_pow₀ (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt (ne_of_gt hk0)⟩
variable {α : Type*} [MulAction G α]
theorem card_orbit (a : α) [Finite (orbit G a)] : ∃ n : ℕ, Nat.card (orbit G a) = p ^ n := by
let ϕ := orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer G a
haveI := Finite.of_equiv (orbit G a) ϕ
haveI := (stabilizer G a).finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient
rw [Nat.card_congr ϕ]
exact hG.index (stabilizer G a)
variable (α) [Finite α]
/-- If `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`, then the number of fixed points
of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α` -/
theorem card_modEq_card_fixedPoints : Nat.card α ≡ Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) [MOD p] := by
| have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofFinite (fixedPoints G α)
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
classical
calc
card α = card (Σy : Quotient (orbitRel G α), { x // Quotient.mk'' x = y }) :=
card_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv (@Quotient.mk'' _ (orbitRel G α))).symm
_ = ∑ a : Quotient (orbitRel G α), card { x // Quotient.mk'' x = a } := card_sigma
_ ≡ ∑ _a : fixedPoints G α, 1 [MOD p] := ?_
_ = _ := by simp
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PGroup.lean | 155 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.CPolynomialDef
/-! # Properties of continuously polynomial functions
We expand the API around continuously polynomial functions. Notably, we show that this class is
stable under the usual operations (addition, subtraction, negation).
We also prove that continuous multilinear maps are continuously polynomial, and so
are continuous linear maps into continuous multilinear maps. In particular, such maps are
analytic.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
open scoped Topology
open Set Filter Asymptotics NNReal ENNReal
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf pg : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} {n m : ℕ}
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 ⊤ :=
⟨hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const, fun n hn ↦ constFormalMultilinearSeries_apply (id hn : 0 < n).ne'⟩
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 :=
⟨⊤, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt_const {v : F} : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) x :=
⟨constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v, 1, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
fun _ _ => CPolynomialAt_const
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) r :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun N hN ↦ by
rw [Pi.add_apply, hf.finite _ ((le_max_left n m).trans hN),
hg.finite _ ((le_max_right n m).trans hN), zero_add]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt.add (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f + g) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
let ⟨_, _, hqf⟩ := hg
(hpf.add hqf).cpolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (-f) (-pf) x n r :=
⟨hf.1.neg, fun m hm ↦ by rw [Pi.neg_apply, hf.finite m hm, neg_zero]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (-f) (-pf) x n :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.neg.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt
theorem CPolynomialAt.neg (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (-f) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
hpf.neg.cpolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) r := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialAt.sub (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f - g) x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialOn.add {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f + g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).add (hg z hz)
theorem CPolynomialOn.sub {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f - g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).sub (hg z hz)
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We show that continuous multilinear maps are continuously polynomial, and therefore analytic.
-/
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {Em : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Em i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Em i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Em F) {x : Π i, Em i} {s : Set (Π i, Em i)}
open FormalMultilinearSeries
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f f.toFormalMultilinearSeries 0 (Fintype.card ι + 1) ⊤ :=
.mk' (fun _ hm ↦ dif_neg (Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hm).ne) ENNReal.zero_lt_top fun y _ ↦ by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
lemma cpolynomialAt : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x :=
f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.cpolynomialAt_of_mem
(by simp only [Metric.emetric_ball_top, Set.mem_univ])
lemma cpolynomialOn : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s := fun _ _ ↦ f.cpolynomialAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias cpolyomialOn := cpolynomialOn
lemma analyticOnNhd : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s := f.cpolynomialOn.analyticOnNhd
lemma analyticOn : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s := f.analyticOnNhd.analyticOn
lemma analyticAt : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x := f.cpolynomialAt.analyticAt
lemma analyticWithinAt : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := f.analyticAt.analyticWithinAt
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-!
### Continuous linear maps into continuous multilinear maps
We show that a continuous linear map into continuous multilinear maps is continuously polynomial
(as a function of two variables, i.e., uncurried). Therefore, it is also analytic.
-/
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {Em : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Em i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Em i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Em F)
{s : Set (G × (Π i, Em i))} {x : G × (Π i, Em i)}
/-- Formal multilinear series associated to a linear map into multilinear maps. -/
noncomputable def toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear :
FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 (G × (Π i, Em i)) F :=
fun n ↦ if h : Fintype.card (Option ι) = n then
(f.continuousMultilinearMapOption).domDomCongr (Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq h)
else 0
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_uncurry_of_multilinear :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2)
f.toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear 0 (Fintype.card (Option ι) + 1) ⊤ := by
apply HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.mk' ?_ ENNReal.zero_lt_top ?_
· intro m hm
apply dif_neg
exact Nat.ne_of_lt hm
· intro y _
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
lemma cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_uncurry_of_multilinear.cpolynomialAt_of_mem
(by simp only [Metric.emetric_ball_top, Set.mem_univ])
lemma cpolyomialOn_uncurry_of_multilinear :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
fun _ _ ↦ f.cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear
lemma analyticOnNhd_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.cpolyomialOn_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticOnNhd
lemma analyticOn_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.analyticOnNhd_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticOn
lemma analyticAt_uncurry_of_multilinear : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticAt
lemma analyticWithinAt_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s x :=
f.analyticAt_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticWithinAt
end ContinuousLinearMap
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/CPolynomial.lean | 384 | 393 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 1,505 | 1,508 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
/-!
# The Lie algebra `sl₂` and its representations
The Lie algebra `sl₂` is the unique simple Lie algebra of minimal rank, 1, and as such occupies a
distinguished position in the general theory. This file provides some basic definitions and results
about `sl₂`.
## Main definitions:
* `IsSl2Triple`: a structure representing a triple of elements in a Lie algebra which satisfy the
standard relations for `sl₂`.
* `IsSl2Triple.HasPrimitiveVectorWith`: a structure representing a primitive vector in a
representation of a Lie algebra relative to a distinguished `sl₂` triple.
* `IsSl2Triple.HasPrimitiveVectorWith.exists_nat`: the eigenvalue of a primitive vector must be a
natural number if the representation is finite-dimensional.
-/
variable (R L M : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
open LieModule Set
variable {L} in
/-- An `sl₂` triple within a Lie ring `L` is a triple of elements `h`, `e`, `f` obeying relations
which ensure that the Lie subalgebra they generate is equivalent to `sl₂`. -/
structure IsSl2Triple (h e f : L) : Prop where
h_ne_zero : h ≠ 0
lie_e_f : ⁅e, f⁆ = h
lie_h_e_nsmul : ⁅h, e⁆ = 2 • e
lie_h_f_nsmul : ⁅h, f⁆ = - (2 • f)
namespace IsSl2Triple
variable {L M}
variable {h e f : L}
lemma symm (ht : IsSl2Triple h e f) : IsSl2Triple (-h) f e where
h_ne_zero := by simpa using ht.h_ne_zero
lie_e_f := by rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, lie_skew, ht.lie_e_f]
lie_h_e_nsmul := by rw [neg_lie, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ht.lie_h_f_nsmul]
lie_h_f_nsmul := by rw [neg_lie, neg_inj, ht.lie_h_e_nsmul]
@[simp] lemma symm_iff : IsSl2Triple (-h) f e ↔ IsSl2Triple h e f :=
⟨fun t ↦ neg_neg h ▸ t.symm, symm⟩
lemma lie_h_e_smul (t : IsSl2Triple h e f) : ⁅h, e⁆ = (2 : R) • e := by
simp [t.lie_h_e_nsmul, two_smul]
lemma lie_lie_smul_f (t : IsSl2Triple h e f) : ⁅h, f⁆ = -((2 : R) • f) := by
simp [t.lie_h_f_nsmul, two_smul]
lemma e_ne_zero (t : IsSl2Triple h e f) : e ≠ 0 := by
have := t.h_ne_zero
contrapose! this
simpa [this] using t.lie_e_f.symm
lemma f_ne_zero (t : IsSl2Triple h e f) : f ≠ 0 := by
have := t.h_ne_zero
contrapose! this
simpa [this] using t.lie_e_f.symm
variable {R}
/-- Given a representation of a Lie algebra with distinguished `sl₂` triple, a vector is said to be
primitive if it is a simultaneous eigenvector for the action of both `h`, `e`, and the eigenvalue
for `e` is zero. -/
structure HasPrimitiveVectorWith (t : IsSl2Triple h e f) (m : M) (μ : R) : Prop where
ne_zero : m ≠ 0
lie_h : ⁅h, m⁆ = μ • m
lie_e : ⁅e, m⁆ = 0
| /-- Given a representation of a Lie algebra with distinguished `sl₂` triple, a simultaneous
eigenvector for the action of both `h` and `e` necessarily has eigenvalue zero for `e`. -/
lemma HasPrimitiveVectorWith.mk' [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ M] (t : IsSl2Triple h e f) (m : M) (μ ρ : R)
(hm : m ≠ 0) (hm' : ⁅h, m⁆ = μ • m) (he : ⁅e, m⁆ = ρ • m) :
HasPrimitiveVectorWith t m μ where
ne_zero := hm
lie_h := hm'
lie_e := by
suffices 2 • ⁅e, m⁆ = 0 by simpa using this
rw [← nsmul_lie, ← t.lie_h_e_nsmul, lie_lie, hm', lie_smul, he, lie_smul, hm',
smul_smul, smul_smul, mul_comm ρ μ, sub_self]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Sl2.lean | 82 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.EventuallyMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.AEDisjoint
/-!
# Null measurable sets and complete measures
## Main definitions
### Null measurable sets and functions
A set `s : Set α` is called *null measurable* (`MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet`) if it satisfies
any of the following equivalent conditions:
* there exists a measurable set `t` such that `s =ᵐ[μ] t` (this is used as a definition);
* `MeasureTheory.toMeasurable μ s =ᵐ[μ] s`;
* there exists a measurable subset `t ⊆ s` such that `t =ᵐ[μ] s` (in this case the latter equality
means that `μ (s \ t) = 0`);
* `s` can be represented as a union of a measurable set and a set of measure zero;
* `s` can be represented as a difference of a measurable set and a set of measure zero.
Null measurable sets form a σ-algebra that is registered as a `MeasurableSpace` instance on
`MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSpace α μ`. We also say that `f : α → β` is
`MeasureTheory.NullMeasurable` if the preimage of a measurable set is a null measurable set.
In other words, `f : α → β` is null measurable if it is measurable as a function
`MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSpace α μ → β`.
### Complete measures
We say that a measure `μ` is complete w.r.t. the `MeasurableSpace α` σ-algebra (or the σ-algebra is
complete w.r.t measure `μ`) if every set of measure zero is measurable. In this case all null
measurable sets and functions are measurable.
For each measure `μ`, we define `MeasureTheory.Measure.completion μ` to be the same measure
interpreted as a measure on `MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSpace α μ` and prove that this is a
complete measure.
## Implementation notes
We define `MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet` as `@MeasurableSet (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) _` so
that theorems about `MeasurableSet`s like `MeasurableSet.union` can be applied to
`NullMeasurableSet`s. However, these lemmas output terms of the same form
`@MeasurableSet (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) _ _`. While this is definitionally equal to the
expected output `NullMeasurableSet s μ`, it looks different and may be misleading. So we copy all
standard lemmas about measurable sets to the `MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet` namespace and fix
the output type.
## Tags
measurable, measure, null measurable, completion
-/
open Filter Set Encodable
open scoped ENNReal
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A type tag for `α` with `MeasurableSet` given by `NullMeasurableSet`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def NullMeasurableSpace (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α]
(_μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Type _ :=
α
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α}
instance NullMeasurableSpace.instInhabited [h : Inhabited α] :
Inhabited (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) :=
h
instance NullMeasurableSpace.instSubsingleton [h : Subsingleton α] :
Subsingleton (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) :=
h
instance NullMeasurableSpace.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) :=
@EventuallyMeasurableSpace α inferInstance (ae μ) _
/-- A set is called `NullMeasurableSet` if it can be approximated by a measurable set up to
a set of null measure. -/
def NullMeasurableSet [MeasurableSpace α] (s : Set α)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
@MeasurableSet (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) _ s
@[simp, aesop unsafe (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet (h : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
h.eventuallyMeasurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_empty : NullMeasurableSet ∅ μ :=
MeasurableSet.empty
theorem nullMeasurableSet_univ : NullMeasurableSet univ μ :=
MeasurableSet.univ
namespace NullMeasurableSet
theorem of_null (h : μ s = 0) : NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
⟨∅, MeasurableSet.empty, ae_eq_empty.2 h⟩
theorem compl (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : NullMeasurableSet sᶜ μ :=
MeasurableSet.compl h
theorem of_compl (h : NullMeasurableSet sᶜ μ) : NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
MeasurableSet.of_compl h
@[simp]
theorem compl_iff : NullMeasurableSet sᶜ μ ↔ NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
MeasurableSet.compl_iff
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
Subsingleton.measurableSet
protected theorem congr (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : NullMeasurableSet t μ :=
EventuallyMeasurableSet.congr hs h.symm
@[measurability]
protected theorem iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : NullMeasurableSet (⋃ i, s i) μ :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion h
protected theorem biUnion {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) : NullMeasurableSet (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) μ :=
MeasurableSet.biUnion hs h
protected theorem sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (⋃₀ s) μ := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]
exact MeasurableSet.biUnion hs h
@[measurability]
protected theorem iInter {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) : NullMeasurableSet (⋂ i, f i) μ :=
MeasurableSet.iInter h
protected theorem biInter {f : β → Set α} {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) : NullMeasurableSet (⋂ b ∈ s, f b) μ :=
MeasurableSet.biInter hs h
protected theorem sInter {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (⋂₀ s) μ :=
MeasurableSet.sInter hs h
@[simp]
protected theorem union (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (s ∪ t) μ :=
MeasurableSet.union hs ht
protected theorem union_null (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t = 0) :
NullMeasurableSet (s ∪ t) μ :=
hs.union (of_null ht)
@[simp]
protected theorem inter (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (s ∩ t) μ :=
MeasurableSet.inter hs ht
@[simp]
protected theorem diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
NullMeasurableSet (s \ t) μ :=
MeasurableSet.diff hs ht
@[simp]
protected theorem symmDiff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : NullMeasurableSet s₁ μ)
(h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) : NullMeasurableSet (symmDiff s₁ s₂) μ :=
(h₁.diff h₂).union (h₂.diff h₁)
@[simp]
protected theorem disjointed {f : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (n) :
NullMeasurableSet (disjointed f n) μ :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed h n
protected theorem const (p : Prop) : NullMeasurableSet { _a : α | p } μ :=
MeasurableSet.const p
instance instMeasurableSingletonClass [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
MeasurableSingletonClass (NullMeasurableSpace α μ) :=
EventuallyMeasurableSpace.measurableSingleton (m := m0)
protected theorem insert [MeasurableSingletonClass (NullMeasurableSpace α μ)]
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (a : α) : NullMeasurableSet (insert a s) μ :=
MeasurableSet.insert hs a
theorem exists_measurable_superset_ae_eq (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∃ t ⊇ s, MeasurableSet t ∧ t =ᵐ[μ] s := by
rcases h with ⟨t, htm, hst⟩
refine ⟨t ∪ toMeasurable μ (s \ t), ?_, htm.union (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), ?_⟩
· exact diff_subset_iff.1 (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· have : toMeasurable μ (s \ t) =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) := by simp [ae_le_set.1 hst.le]
simpa only [union_empty] using hst.symm.union this
theorem toMeasurable_ae_eq (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : toMeasurable μ s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [toMeasurable_def, dif_pos]
exact (exists_measurable_superset_ae_eq h).choose_spec.2.2
theorem compl_toMeasurable_compl_ae_eq (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : (toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ =ᵐ[μ] s :=
Iff.mpr ae_eq_set_compl <| toMeasurable_ae_eq h.compl
theorem exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∃ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t ∧ t =ᵐ[μ] s :=
⟨(toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ, compl_subset_comm.2 <| subset_toMeasurable _ _,
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, compl_toMeasurable_compl_ae_eq h⟩
end NullMeasurableSet
open NullMeasurableSet
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If `sᵢ` is a countable family of (null) measurable pairwise `μ`-a.e. disjoint sets, then there
exists a subordinate family `tᵢ ⊆ sᵢ` of measurable pairwise disjoint sets such that
`tᵢ =ᵐ[μ] sᵢ`. -/
theorem exists_subordinate_pairwise_disjoint [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) :
∃ t : ι → Set α,
(∀ i, t i ⊆ s i) ∧
(∀ i, s i =ᵐ[μ] t i) ∧ (∀ i, MeasurableSet (t i)) ∧ Pairwise (Disjoint on t) := by
choose t ht_sub htm ht_eq using fun i => exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq (h i)
rcases exists_null_pairwise_disjoint_diff hd with ⟨u, hum, hu₀, hud⟩
exact
⟨fun i => t i \ u i, fun i => diff_subset.trans (ht_sub _), fun i =>
(ht_eq _).symm.trans (diff_null_ae_eq_self (hu₀ i)).symm, fun i => (htm i).diff (hum i),
hud.mono fun i j h =>
h.mono (diff_subset_diff_left (ht_sub i)) (diff_subset_diff_left (ht_sub j))⟩
theorem measure_iUnion {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hn : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, μ (f i) := by
rw [measure_eq_extend (MeasurableSet.iUnion h),
extend_iUnion MeasurableSet.empty _ MeasurableSet.iUnion _ hn h]
· simp [measure_eq_extend, h]
· exact μ.empty
· exact μ.m_iUnion
theorem measure_iUnion₀ [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f))
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, μ (f i) := by
rcases exists_subordinate_pairwise_disjoint h hd with ⟨t, _ht_sub, ht_eq, htm, htd⟩
calc
μ (⋃ i, f i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion ht_eq)
_ = ∑' i, μ (t i) := measure_iUnion htd htm
_ = ∑' i, μ (f i) := tsum_congr fun i => measure_congr (ht_eq _).symm
theorem measure_union₀_aux (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) : μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion₀, tsum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond]
exacts [(pairwise_on_bool AEDisjoint.symmetric).2 hd, fun b => Bool.casesOn b ht hs]
/-- A null measurable set `t` is Carathéodory measurable: for any `s`, we have
`μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s`. -/
theorem measure_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset μ s with ⟨s', hsub, hs'm, hs'⟩
replace hs'm : NullMeasurableSet s' μ := hs'm.nullMeasurableSet
calc
μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) ≤ μ (s' ∩ t) + μ (s' \ t) := by gcongr
_ = μ (s' ∩ t ∪ s' \ t) :=
(measure_union₀_aux (hs'm.inter ht) (hs'm.diff ht) <|
(@disjoint_inf_sdiff _ s' t _).aedisjoint).symm
_ = μ s' := congr_arg μ (inter_union_diff _ _)
_ = μ s := hs'
/-- If `s` and `t` are null measurable sets of equal measure
and their intersection has finite measure,
then `s \ t` and `t \ s` have equal measures too. -/
theorem measure_diff_symm (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(h : μ s = μ t) (hfin : μ (s ∩ t) ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = μ (t \ s) := by
rw [← ENNReal.add_right_inj hfin, measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht, inter_comm,
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ hs, h]
theorem measure_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem measure_union_add_inter₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter₀ t hs, add_comm]
theorem measure_union₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) :
μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t := by rw [← measure_union_add_inter₀ s ht, hd, add_zero]
theorem measure_union₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) :
μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t := by rw [union_comm, measure_union₀ hs (AEDisjoint.symm hd), add_comm]
theorem measure_add_measure_compl₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ := by rw [← measure_union₀' hs aedisjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
lemma measure_of_measure_compl_eq_zero (hs : μ sᶜ = 0) : μ s = μ Set.univ := by
simpa [hs] using measure_add_measure_compl₀ <| .of_compl <| .of_null hs
section MeasurableSingletonClass
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass (NullMeasurableSpace α μ)]
theorem nullMeasurableSet_singleton (x : α) : NullMeasurableSet {x} μ :=
@measurableSet_singleton _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem nullMeasurableSet_insert {a : α} {s : Set α} :
NullMeasurableSet (insert a s) μ ↔ NullMeasurableSet s μ :=
measurableSet_insert
|
theorem nullMeasurableSet_eq {a : α} : NullMeasurableSet { x | x = a } μ :=
nullMeasurableSet_singleton a
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/NullMeasurable.lean | 310 | 312 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
/-! # Positive Definite Matrices
This file defines positive (semi)definite matrices and connects the notion to positive definiteness
of quadratic forms. Most results require `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.PosDef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive definite if it is hermitian and `xᴴMx`
is greater than zero for all nonzero `x`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive semidefinite if it is hermitian
and `xᴴMx` is nonnegative for all `x`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive
semidefinite iff it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt` : the unique positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite
matrix. (See `Matrix.PosSemidef.eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq` for the proof of uniqueness.)
-/
open scoped ComplexOrder
namespace Matrix
variable {m n R 𝕜 : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R]
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
open scoped Matrix
/-!
## Positive semidefinite matrices
-/
/-- A matrix `M : Matrix n n R` is positive semidefinite if it is Hermitian and `xᴴ * M * x` is
nonnegative for all `x`. -/
def PosSemidef (M : Matrix n n R) :=
M.IsHermitian ∧ ∀ x : n → R, 0 ≤ dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)
protected theorem PosSemidef.diagonal [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} (h : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) :=
⟨isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ <| funext fun i => IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (h i),
fun x => by
refine Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => ?_
simpa only [mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc] using conjugate_nonneg (h i) _⟩
/-- A diagonal matrix is positive semidefinite iff its diagonal entries are nonnegative. -/
lemma posSemidef_diagonal_iff [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, 0 ≤ d i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hP⟩ i ↦ by simpa using hP (Pi.single i 1), .diagonal⟩
namespace PosSemidef
theorem isHermitian {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M.IsHermitian :=
hM.1
theorem re_dotProduct_nonneg {M : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (x : n → 𝕜) :
0 ≤ RCLike.re (dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)) :=
RCLike.nonneg_iff.mp (hM.2 _) |>.1
lemma conjTranspose_mul_mul_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix n m R) :
PosSemidef (Bᴴ * A * B) := by
constructor
· exact isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul B hA.1
· intro x
simpa only [star_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_vecMul] using hA.2 (B *ᵥ x)
lemma mul_mul_conjTranspose_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (B * A * Bᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using hA.conjTranspose_mul_mul_same Bᴴ
theorem submatrix {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (e : m → n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef := by
classical
rw [(by simp : M = 1 * M * 1), submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id),
submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id), submatrix_id_id]
simpa only [conjTranspose_submatrix, conjTranspose_one] using
conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM (Matrix.submatrix 1 id e)
theorem transpose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᵀ.PosSemidef := by
refine ⟨IsHermitian.transpose hM.1, fun x => ?_⟩
convert hM.2 (star x) using 1
rw [mulVec_transpose, dotProduct_mulVec, star_star, dotProduct_comm]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_transpose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} : Mᵀ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.transpose), .transpose⟩
theorem conjTranspose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᴴ.PosSemidef := hM.1.symm ▸ hM
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_conjTranspose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
Mᴴ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.conjTranspose), .conjTranspose⟩
protected lemma zero : PosSemidef (0 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_zero, by simp⟩
protected lemma one [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] : PosSemidef (1 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_one, fun x => by
rw [one_mulVec]; exact Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => star_mul_self_nonneg _⟩
protected theorem natCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_natCast _, fun x => by
simp only [natCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact nsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) _⟩
protected theorem ofNat [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) [d.AtLeastTwo] :
PosSemidef (ofNat(d) : Matrix n n R) :=
.natCast d
protected theorem intCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℤ) (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_intCast _, fun x => by
simp only [intCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul]
exact zsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) hd⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_intCast_iff
[StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] [Nontrivial R] (d : ℤ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) ↔ 0 ≤ d :=
posSemidef_diagonal_iff.trans <| by simp [Pi.le_def]
protected lemma pow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (k : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (M ^ k) :=
match k with
| 0 => .one
| 1 => by simpa using hM
| (k + 2) => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
simpa only [hM.isHermitian.eq] using (hM.pow k).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same M
protected lemma inv [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M⁻¹.PosSemidef := by
by_cases h : IsUnit M.det
· have := (conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM M⁻¹).conjTranspose
rwa [mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right _ _ h, conjTranspose_conjTranspose] at this
· rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
exact .zero
protected lemma zpow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (z : ℤ) :
(M ^ z).PosSemidef := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := z.eq_nat_or_neg
· simpa using hM.pow n
· simpa using (hM.pow n).inv
protected lemma add [AddLeftMono R] {A : Matrix m m R} {B : Matrix m m R}
(hA : A.PosSemidef) (hB : B.PosSemidef) : (A + B).PosSemidef :=
⟨hA.isHermitian.add hB.isHermitian, fun x => by
rw [add_mulVec, dotProduct_add]
exact add_nonneg (hA.2 x) (hB.2 x)⟩
/-- The eigenvalues of a positive semi-definite matrix are non-negative -/
lemma eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : Matrix.PosSemidef A) (i : n) : 0 ≤ hA.1.eigenvalues i :=
(hA.re_dotProduct_nonneg _).trans_eq (hA.1.eigenvalues_eq _).symm
section sqrt
variable [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A)
/-- The positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix -/
noncomputable def sqrt : Matrix n n 𝕜 :=
hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary.1 * diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) *
(star hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary : Matrix n n 𝕜)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Custom elaborator to produce output like `(_ : PosSemidef A).sqrt` in the goal view. -/
@[app_delab Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt]
def delabSqrt : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
whenNotPPOption getPPAnalysisSkip <|
withOverApp 7 <|
withOptionAtCurrPos `pp.analysis.skip true do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt 7
let optionsPerPos ← withNaryArg 6 do
return (← read).optionsPerPos.setBool (← getPos) `pp.proofs.withType true
withTheReader Context ({· with optionsPerPos}) delab
lemma posSemidef_sqrt : PosSemidef hA.sqrt := by
apply PosSemidef.mul_mul_conjTranspose_same
refine posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr fun i ↦ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, RCLike.nonneg_iff]
constructor
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_re]
exact Real.sqrt_nonneg _
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_im]
@[simp]
lemma sq_sqrt : hA.sqrt ^ 2 = A := by
let C : Matrix n n 𝕜 := hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary
let E := diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues : n → 𝕜)
suffices C * (E * (star C * C) * E) * star C = A by
rw [Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt, pow_two]
simpa only [← mul_assoc] using this
have : E * E = diagonal ((↑) ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) := by
rw [diagonal_mul_diagonal]
congr! with v
simp [← pow_two, ← RCLike.ofReal_pow, Real.sq_sqrt (hA.eigenvalues_nonneg v)]
simpa [C, this] using hA.1.spectral_theorem.symm
@[simp]
lemma sqrt_mul_self : hA.sqrt * hA.sqrt = A := by rw [← pow_two, sq_sqrt]
include hA in
lemma eq_of_sq_eq_sq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B ^ 2) : A = B := by
/- This is deceptively hard, much more difficult than the positive *definite* case. We follow a
clever proof due to Koeber and Schäfer. The idea is that if `A ≠ B`, then `A - B` has a nonzero
real eigenvalue, with eigenvector `v`. Then a manipulation using the identity
`A ^ 2 - B ^ 2 = A * (A - B) + (A - B) * B` leads to the conclusion that
`⟨v, A v⟩ + ⟨v, B v⟩ = 0`. Since `A, B` are positive semidefinite, both terms must be zero. Thus
`⟨v, (A - B) v⟩ = 0`, but this is a nonzero scalar multiple of `⟨v, v⟩`, contradiction. -/
by_contra h_ne
let ⟨v, t, ht, hv, hv'⟩ := (hA.1.sub hB.1).exists_eigenvector_of_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero.mpr h_ne)
have h_sum : 0 = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := calc
0 = star v ⬝ᵥ (A ^ 2 - B ^ 2) *ᵥ v := by rw [hAB, sub_self, zero_mulVec, dotProduct_zero]
_ = star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [mulVec_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, ← dotProduct_add, ← add_mulVec, mul_sub, sub_mul,
add_sub, sub_add_cancel, pow_two, pow_two]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v) + (star v) ᵥ* (A - B)ᴴ ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [hv', mulVec_smul, dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul,
dotProduct_mulVec _ (A - B), hA.1.sub hB.1]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := by
simp_rw [← star_mulVec, hv', mul_add, ← RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← smul_dotProduct]
congr 2 with i
simp only [Pi.star_apply, Pi.smul_apply, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, star_mul',
RCLike.star_def, RCLike.conj_ofReal]
replace h_sum : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [eq_comm, ← mul_zero (t : 𝕜)] at h_sum
exact mul_left_cancel₀ (RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) h_sum
have h_van : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v = 0 ∧ star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ (hA.2 v), le_antisymm ?_ (hB.2 v)⟩
· rw [add_comm, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h_sum
simpa only [h_sum, neg_nonneg] using hB.2 v
· simpa only [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg.mp h_sum, neg_nonneg] using hA.2 v
have aux : star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [sub_mulVec, dotProduct_sub, h_van.1, h_van.2, sub_zero]
rw [hv', dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← mul_zero ↑t] at aux
exact hv <| dotProduct_star_self_eq_zero.mp <| mul_left_cancel₀
(RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) aux
lemma sqrt_sq : (hA.pow 2 : PosSemidef (A ^ 2)).sqrt = A :=
(hA.pow 2).posSemidef_sqrt.eq_of_sq_eq_sq hA (hA.pow 2).sq_sqrt
include hA in
lemma eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B) : A = hB.sqrt := by
subst B
rw [hA.sqrt_sq]
end sqrt
end PosSemidef
@[simp]
theorem posSemidef_submatrix_equiv {M : Matrix n n R} (e : m ≃ n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.submatrix e.symm, fun h => h.submatrix _⟩
/-- The conjugate transpose of a matrix multiplied by the matrix is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self [StarOrderedRing R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (Aᴴ * A) := by
refine ⟨isHermitian_transpose_mul_self _, fun x => ?_⟩
rw [← mulVec_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_conjTranspose, star_star]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg fun i _ => star_mul_self_nonneg _
/-- A matrix multiplied by its conjugate transpose is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_self_mul_conjTranspose [StarOrderedRing R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (A * Aᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self Aᴴ
lemma eigenvalues_conjTranspose_mul_self_nonneg (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) [DecidableEq n] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (isHermitian_transpose_mul_self A).eigenvalues i :=
(posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self _).eigenvalues_nonneg _
lemma eigenvalues_self_mul_conjTranspose_nonneg (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) [DecidableEq m] (i : m) :
0 ≤ (isHermitian_mul_conjTranspose_self A).eigenvalues i :=
(posSemidef_self_mul_conjTranspose _).eigenvalues_nonneg _
/-- A matrix is positive semidefinite if and only if it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`. -/
lemma posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} :
PosSemidef A ↔ ∃ (B : Matrix n n 𝕜), A = Bᴴ * B := by
classical
refine ⟨fun hA ↦ ⟨hA.sqrt, ?_⟩, fun ⟨B, hB⟩ ↦ (hB ▸ posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self B)⟩
simp_rw [← PosSemidef.sq_sqrt hA, pow_two]
rw [hA.posSemidef_sqrt.1]
lemma IsHermitian.posSemidef_of_eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : IsHermitian A) (h : ∀ i : n, 0 ≤ hA.eigenvalues i) : PosSemidef A := by
rw [hA.spectral_theorem]
refine (posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr ?_).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same _
simpa using h
/-- For `A` positive semidefinite, we have `x⋆ A x = 0` iff `A x = 0`. -/
| theorem PosSemidef.dotProduct_mulVec_zero_iff
{A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A) (x : n → 𝕜) :
star x ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ x = 0 ↔ A *ᵥ x = 0 := by
constructor
· obtain ⟨B, rfl⟩ := posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self.mp hA
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec,
vecMul_conjTranspose, star_star, dotProduct_star_self_eq_zero]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PosDef.lean | 309 | 315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an order and an ordinal number.
## Main Definitions
* `Order.cof r` is the cofinality of a reflexive order. This is the smallest cardinality of a subset
`s` that is *cofinal*, i.e. `∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, r x y`.
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o` when viewed as a linear order.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
attribute [local instance] IsRefl.swap
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
private theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
theorem le_cof [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
end Order
namespace RelIso
private theorem cof_le_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) := by
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf, le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine ⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩, lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
theorem cof_eq_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isRefl
(f.cof_le_lift).antisymm (f.symm.cof_le_lift)
theorem cof_eq {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Order.cof r = Order.cof s :=
lift_inj.1 (f.cof_eq_lift)
end RelIso
/-! ### Cofinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
/-- Cofinality of an ordinal. This is the smallest cardinal of a subset `S` of the ordinal which is
unbounded, in the sense `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≤ b`.
In particular, `cof 0 = 0` and `cof (succ o) = 1`. -/
def cof (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
o.liftOn (fun a ↦ Order.cof (swap a.rᶜ)) fun _ _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ f.compl.swap.cof_eq
theorem cof_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (type r).cof = Order.cof (swap rᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem cof_type_lt [LinearOrder α] [IsWellOrder α (· < ·)] :
(@type α (· < ·) _).cof = @Order.cof α (· ≤ ·) := by
rw [cof_type, compl_lt, swap_ge]
theorem cof_eq_cof_toType (o : Ordinal) : o.cof = @Order.cof o.toType (· ≤ ·) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← type_toType o, cof_type_lt]
theorem le_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {c} : c ≤ cof (type r) ↔ ∀ S, Unbounded r S → c ≤ #S :=
(le_csInf_iff'' (Order.cof_nonempty _)).trans
⟨fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H _ h⟩
theorem cof_type_le [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} (h : Unbounded r S) : cof (type r) ≤ #S :=
le_cof_type.1 le_rfl S h
theorem lt_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} : #S < cof (type r) → Bounded r S := by
simpa using not_imp_not.2 cof_type_le
theorem cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : ∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
csInf_mem (Order.cof_nonempty (swap rᶜ))
theorem ord_cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ type (Subrel r (· ∈ S)) = (cof (type r)).ord := by
let ⟨S, hS, e⟩ := cof_eq r
let ⟨s, _, e'⟩ := Cardinal.ord_eq S
let T : Set α := { a | ∃ aS : a ∈ S, ∀ b : S, s b ⟨_, aS⟩ → r b a }
suffices Unbounded r T by
refine ⟨T, this, le_antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.ord_le.2 <| cof_type_le this)⟩
rw [← e, e']
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone
(fun a : T =>
(⟨a,
let ⟨aS, _⟩ := a.2
aS⟩ :
S))
fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
rcases a with ⟨a, aS, ha⟩
rcases b with ⟨b, bS, hb⟩
change s ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
refine ((trichotomous_of s _ _).resolve_left fun hn => ?_).resolve_left ?_
· exact asymm h (ha _ hn)
· intro e
injection e with e
subst b
exact irrefl _ h
intro a
have : { b : S | ¬r b a }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨b, bS, ba⟩ := hS a
⟨⟨b, bS⟩, ba⟩
let b := (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded s).min _ this
have ba : ¬r b a := IsWellFounded.wf.min_mem _ this
refine ⟨b, ⟨b.2, fun c => not_imp_not.1 fun h => ?_⟩, ba⟩
rw [show ∀ b : S, (⟨b, b.2⟩ : S) = b by intro b; cases b; rfl]
exact IsWellFounded.wf.not_lt_min _ this (IsOrderConnected.neg_trans h ba)
/-! ### Cofinality of suprema and least strict upper bounds -/
private theorem card_mem_cof {o} : ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = o.card :=
⟨_, _, lsub_typein o, mk_toType o⟩
/-- The set in the `lsub` characterization of `cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_lsub_def_nonempty (o) :
{ a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, card_mem_cof⟩
theorem cof_eq_sInf_lsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) : cof o =
sInf { a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : Type u) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a } := by
refine le_antisymm (le_csInf (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o) ?_) (csInf_le' ?_)
· rintro a ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩
rw [← type_toType o]
refine
(cof_type_le fun a => ?_).trans
(@mk_le_of_injective _ _
(fun s : typein ((· < ·) : o.toType → o.toType → Prop) ⁻¹' Set.range f =>
Classical.choose s.prop)
fun s t hst => by
let H := congr_arg f hst
rwa [Classical.choose_spec s.prop, Classical.choose_spec t.prop, typein_inj,
Subtype.coe_inj] at H)
have := typein_lt_self a
simp_rw [← hf, lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
refine ⟨enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨f i, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [type_toType, ← hf]
apply lt_lsub
· rw [mem_preimage, typein_enum]
exact mem_range_self i
· rwa [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum]
· rcases cof_eq (α := o.toType) (· < ·) with ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩
let f : S → Ordinal := fun s => typein LT.lt s.val
refine ⟨S, f, le_antisymm (lsub_le fun i => typein_lt_self (o := o) i)
(le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_), by rwa [type_toType o] at hS'⟩
rw [← type_toType o] at ha
rcases hS (enum (· < ·) ⟨a, ha⟩) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
rw [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum] at hb'
exact hb'.trans_lt (lt_lsub.{u, u} f ⟨b, hb⟩)
@[simp]
theorem lift_cof (o) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (cof o) = cof (Ordinal.lift.{u, v} o) := by
refine inductionOn o fun α r _ ↦ ?_
rw [← type_uLift, cof_type, cof_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v, u} (Order.cof _),
← Cardinal.lift_umax]
apply RelIso.cof_eq_lift ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm, _⟩
simp [swap]
theorem cof_le_card (o) : cof o ≤ card o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' card_mem_cof
theorem cof_ord_le (c : Cardinal) : c.ord.cof ≤ c := by simpa using cof_le_card c.ord
theorem ord_cof_le (o : Ordinal.{u}) : o.cof.ord ≤ o :=
(ord_le_ord.2 (cof_le_card o)).trans (ord_card_le o)
theorem exists_lsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = cof o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_mem (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)
theorem cof_lsub_le {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : cof (lsub.{u, u} f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' ⟨ι, f, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem cof_lsub_le_lift {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) :
cof (lsub.{u, v} f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← mk_uLift.{u, v}]
convert cof_lsub_le.{max u v} fun i : ULift.{v, u} ι => f i.down
exact
lsub_eq_of_range_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}
(Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨ULift.up.{v, u} i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩)
theorem le_cof_iff_lsub {o : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof o ↔ ∀ {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o → a ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact
(le_csInf_iff'' (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)).trans
⟨fun H ι f hf => H _ ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨ι, f, hf, hb⟩ => by
rw [← hb]
exact H _ hf⟩
theorem lsub_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : lsub.{u, v} f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (lsub_le hf) fun h => by
subst h
exact (cof_lsub_le_lift.{u, v} f).not_lt hι
theorem lsub_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → lsub.{u, u} f < c :=
lsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem cof_iSup_le_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← Ordinal.sup] at *
rw [← sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift f
theorem cof_iSup_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [← (#ι).lift_id]
exact cof_iSup_le_lift H
theorem iSup_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c :=
(sup_le_lsub.{u, v} f).trans_lt (lsub_lt_ord_lift hι hf)
theorem iSup_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem iSup_lt_lift {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.ord.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c := by
rw [← ord_lt_ord, iSup_ord (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)]
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift hι fun i => ?_
rw [ord_lt_ord]
apply hf
theorem iSup_lt {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal} (hι : #ι < c.ord.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c)
(hc' : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < cof c) (hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} (ha : a < c) :
nfpFamily f a < c := by
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift ((Cardinal.lift_le.2 (mk_list_le_max ι)).trans_lt ?_) fun l => ?_
· rw [lift_max]
apply max_lt _ hc'
rwa [Cardinal.lift_aleph0]
· induction' l with i l H
· exact ha
· exact hf _ _ H
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hc' : #ι < cof c)
(hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} : a < c → nfpFamily.{u, u} f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id]) hf
theorem nfp_lt_ord {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hf : ∀ i < c, f i < c) {a} :
a < c → nfp f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by simpa using Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0.trans hc) fun _ => hf
theorem exists_blsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ f : ∀ a < (cof o).ord, Ordinal, blsub.{u, u} _ f = o := by
rcases exists_lsub_cof o with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
rw [← hι, hι']
exact ⟨_, hf⟩
theorem le_cof_iff_blsub {b : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof b ↔ ∀ {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), blsub.{u, u} o f = b → a ≤ o.card :=
le_cof_iff_lsub.trans
⟨fun H o f hf => by simpa using H _ hf, fun H ι f hf => by
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
simpa using H _ hf⟩
theorem cof_blsub_le_lift {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) :
cof (blsub.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← mk_toType o]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift _
theorem cof_blsub_le {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) : cof (blsub.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift f
theorem blsub_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, v} o f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (blsub_le hf) fun h =>
ho.not_le (by simpa [← iSup_ord, hf, h] using cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f)
theorem blsub_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, u} o f < c :=
blsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id]) hf
theorem cof_bsup_le_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} (H : ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, v} o f) :
cof (bsup.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f
theorem cof_bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} :
(∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, u} o f) → cof (bsup.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_bsup_le_lift
theorem bsup_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : bsup.{u, v} o f < c :=
(bsup_le_blsub f).trans_lt (blsub_lt_ord_lift ho hf)
theorem bsup_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof) :
(∀ i hi, f i hi < c) → bsup.{u, u} o f < c :=
bsup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id])
/-! ### Basic results -/
@[simp]
theorem cof_zero : cof 0 = 0 := by
refine LE.le.antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.zero_le _)
rw [← card_zero]
exact cof_le_card 0
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_zero {o} : cof o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨inductionOn o fun _ r _ z =>
let ⟨_, hl, e⟩ := cof_eq r
type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty.2 <|
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨_, h, _⟩ := hl a
(mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (e.trans z)).elim' ⟨_, h⟩⟩,
fun e => by simp [e]⟩
theorem cof_ne_zero {o} : cof o ≠ 0 ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
cof_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem cof_succ (o) : cof (succ o) = 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine inductionOn o fun α r _ => ?_
change cof (type _) ≤ _
rw [← (_ : #_ = 1)]
· apply cof_type_le
refine fun a => ⟨Sum.inr PUnit.unit, Set.mem_singleton _, ?_⟩
rcases a with (a | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> simp [EmptyRelation]
· rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Set.card_singleton]
simp
· rw [← Cardinal.succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Cardinal.zero_le] using fun h =>
succ_ne_zero o (cof_eq_zero.1 (Eq.symm h))
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ {o} : cof.{u} o = 1 ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨inductionOn o fun α r _ z => by
rcases cof_eq r with ⟨S, hl, e⟩; rw [z] at e
obtain ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 (by rw [e]; exact one_ne_zero)
refine
⟨typein r a,
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ fun x y => ?_) fun x => ?_⟩⟩
· apply Sum.rec <;> [exact Subtype.val; exact fun _ => a]
· rcases x with (x | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> rcases y with (y | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;>
simp [Subrel, Order.Preimage, EmptyRelation]
exact x.2
· suffices r x a ∨ ∃ _ : PUnit.{u}, ↑a = x by
convert this
dsimp [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone]; simp
rcases trichotomous_of r x a with (h | h | h)
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨PUnit.unit, h.symm⟩
· rcases hl x with ⟨a', aS, hn⟩
refine absurd h ?_
convert hn
change (a : α) = ↑(⟨a', aS⟩ : S)
have := le_one_iff_subsingleton.1 (le_of_eq e)
congr!,
fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp [e]⟩
/-! ### Fundamental sequences -/
-- TODO: move stuff about fundamental sequences to their own file.
/-- A fundamental sequence for `a` is an increasing sequence of length `o = cof a` that converges at
`a`. We provide `o` explicitly in order to avoid type rewrites. -/
def IsFundamentalSequence (a o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}) : Prop :=
o ≤ a.cof.ord ∧ (∀ {i j} (hi hj), i < j → f i hi < f j hj) ∧ blsub.{u, u} o f = a
namespace IsFundamentalSequence
variable {a o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}}
protected theorem cof_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : a.cof.ord = o :=
hf.1.antisymm' <| by
rw [← hf.2.2]
exact (ord_le_ord.2 (cof_blsub_le f)).trans (ord_card_le o)
protected theorem strict_mono (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j} :
∀ hi hj, i < j → f i hi < f j hj :=
hf.2.1
theorem blsub_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : blsub.{u, u} o f = a :=
hf.2.2
theorem ord_cof (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) :
IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord fun i hi => f i (hi.trans_le (by rw [hf.cof_eq])) := by
have H := hf.cof_eq
subst H
exact hf
theorem id_of_le_cof (h : o ≤ o.cof.ord) : IsFundamentalSequence o o fun a _ => a :=
⟨h, @fun _ _ _ _ => id, blsub_id o⟩
protected theorem zero {f : ∀ b < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal} : IsFundamentalSequence 0 0 f :=
⟨by rw [cof_zero, ord_zero], @fun i _ hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim, blsub_zero f⟩
protected theorem succ : IsFundamentalSequence (succ o) 1 fun _ _ => o := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j hi hj h => ?_, blsub_const Ordinal.one_ne_zero o⟩
· rw [cof_succ, ord_one]
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at hi hj
rw [hi, hj] at h
exact h.false.elim
protected theorem monotone (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j : Ordinal} (hi : i < o)
(hj : j < o) (hij : i ≤ j) : f i hi ≤ f j hj := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hij with (hij | rfl)
· exact (hf.2.1 hi hj hij).le
· rfl
theorem trans {a o o' : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f)
{g : ∀ b < o', Ordinal.{u}} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence o o' g) :
IsFundamentalSequence a o' fun i hi =>
f (g i hi) (by rw [← hg.2.2]; apply lt_blsub) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.2.1 _ _ (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rw [hf.cof_eq]
exact hg.1.trans (ord_cof_le o)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} o _ f (@IsFundamentalSequence.monotone _ _ f hf)]
· exact hf.2.2
· exact hg.2.2
protected theorem lt {a o : Ordinal} {s : Π p < o, Ordinal}
(h : IsFundamentalSequence a o s) {p : Ordinal} (hp : p < o) : s p hp < a :=
h.blsub_eq ▸ lt_blsub s p hp
end IsFundamentalSequence
/-- Every ordinal has a fundamental sequence. -/
theorem exists_fundamental_sequence (a : Ordinal.{u}) :
∃ f, IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord f := by
suffices h : ∃ o f, IsFundamentalSequence a o f by
rcases h with ⟨o, f, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.ord_cof⟩
rcases exists_lsub_cof a with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
| rcases ord_eq ι with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
let r' := Subrel r fun i ↦ ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
let hrr' : r' ↪r r := Subrel.relEmbedding _ _
haveI := hrr'.isWellOrder
refine
⟨_, _, hrr'.ordinal_type_le.trans ?_, @fun i j _ h _ => (enum r' ⟨j, h⟩).prop _ ?_,
le_antisymm (blsub_le fun i hi => lsub_le_iff.1 hf.le _) ?_⟩
· rw [← hι, hr]
· change r (hrr'.1 _) (hrr'.1 _)
rwa [hrr'.2, @enum_lt_enum _ r']
· rw [← hf, lsub_le_iff]
intro i
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 500 | 512 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Cone.Extension
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Extend
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
/-!
# Extension Hahn-Banach theorem
In this file we prove the analytic Hahn-Banach theorem. For any continuous linear function on a
subspace, we can extend it to a function on the entire space without changing its norm.
We prove
* `Real.exists_extension_norm_eq`: Hahn-Banach theorem for continuous linear functions on normed
spaces over `ℝ`.
* `exists_extension_norm_eq`: Hahn-Banach theorem for continuous linear functions on normed spaces
over `ℝ` or `ℂ`.
In order to state and prove the corollaries uniformly, we prove the statements for a field `𝕜`
satisfying `RCLike 𝕜`.
In this setting, `exists_dual_vector` states that, for any nonzero `x`, there exists a continuous
linear form `g` of norm `1` with `g x = ‖x‖` (where the norm has to be interpreted as an element
of `𝕜`).
-/
universe u v
namespace Real
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- **Hahn-Banach theorem** for continuous linear functions over `ℝ`.
See also `exists_extension_norm_eq` in the root namespace for a more general version
that works both for `ℝ` and `ℂ`. -/
theorem exists_extension_norm_eq (p : Subspace ℝ E) (f : p →L[ℝ] ℝ) :
∃ g : E →L[ℝ] ℝ, (∀ x : p, g x = f x) ∧ ‖g‖ = ‖f‖ := by
rcases exists_extension_of_le_sublinear ⟨p, f⟩ (fun x => ‖f‖ * ‖x‖)
(fun c hc x => by simp only [norm_smul c x, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos hc, mul_left_comm])
(fun x y => by
rw [← left_distrib]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_add_le x y) (@norm_nonneg _ _ f))
fun x => le_trans (le_abs_self _) (f.le_opNorm _) with ⟨g, g_eq, g_le⟩
set g' :=
g.mkContinuous ‖f‖ fun x => abs_le.2 ⟨neg_le.1 <| g.map_neg x ▸ norm_neg x ▸ g_le (-x), g_le x⟩
refine ⟨g', g_eq, ?_⟩
apply le_antisymm (g.mkContinuous_norm_le (norm_nonneg f) _)
refine f.opNorm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
dsimp at g_eq
rw [← g_eq]
apply g'.le_opNorm
end Real
section RCLike
open RCLike
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜] {E F : Type*}
[SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- **Hahn-Banach theorem** for continuous linear functions over `𝕜`
satisfying `IsRCLikeNormedField 𝕜`. -/
theorem exists_extension_norm_eq (p : Subspace 𝕜 E) (f : p →L[𝕜] 𝕜) :
∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, (∀ x : p, g x = f x) ∧ ‖g‖ = ‖f‖ := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
letI : IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E := RestrictScalars.isScalarTower _ _ _
letI : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars _ 𝕜 _
-- Let `fr: p →L[ℝ] ℝ` be the real part of `f`.
let fr := reCLM.comp (f.restrictScalars ℝ)
-- Use the real version to get a norm-preserving extension of `fr`, which
-- we'll call `g : E →L[ℝ] ℝ`.
rcases Real.exists_extension_norm_eq (p.restrictScalars ℝ) fr with ⟨g, ⟨hextends, hnormeq⟩⟩
-- Now `g` can be extended to the `E →L[𝕜] 𝕜` we need.
refine ⟨g.extendTo𝕜, ?_⟩
-- It is an extension of `f`.
have h : ∀ x : p, g.extendTo𝕜 x = f x := by
intro x
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.extendTo𝕜_apply, ← Submodule.coe_smul]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
-- The goal has a coercion from `RestrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 E →L[ℝ] ℝ`, but
-- `hextends` involves a coercion from `E →L[ℝ] ℝ`.
erw [hextends]
erw [hextends]
have :
(fr x : 𝕜) - I * ↑(fr ((I : 𝕜) • x)) = (re (f x) : 𝕜) - (I : 𝕜) * re (f ((I : 𝕜) • x)) := by
rfl
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [this]
apply ext
· simp only [add_zero, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, I_re, ofReal_im, AddMonoidHom.map_add, zero_sub,
I_im', zero_mul, ofReal_re, eq_self_iff_true, sub_zero, mul_neg, ofReal_neg,
mul_re, mul_zero, sub_neg_eq_add, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
· simp only [Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, I_re, ofReal_im, AddMonoidHom.map_add, zero_sub, I_im',
zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_neg, mul_im, zero_add, ofReal_neg, mul_re,
sub_neg_eq_add, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
-- And we derive the equality of the norms by bounding on both sides.
refine ⟨h, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· calc
‖g.extendTo𝕜‖ = ‖g‖ := g.norm_extendTo𝕜
_ = ‖fr‖ := hnormeq
_ ≤ ‖reCLM‖ * ‖f‖ := ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_comp_le _ _
_ = ‖f‖ := by rw [reCLM_norm, one_mul]
· exact f.opNorm_le_bound g.extendTo𝕜.opNorm_nonneg fun x => h x ▸ g.extendTo𝕜.le_opNorm x
open Module
|
/-- Corollary of the **Hahn-Banach theorem**: if `f : p → F` is a continuous linear map
from a submodule of a normed space `E` over `𝕜`, `𝕜 = ℝ` or `𝕜 = ℂ`,
with a finite dimensional range, then `f` admits an extension to a continuous linear map `E → F`.
Note that contrary to the case `F = 𝕜`, see `exists_extension_norm_eq`,
we provide no estimates on the norm of the extension.
-/
lemma ContinuousLinearMap.exist_extension_of_finiteDimensional_range {p : Submodule 𝕜 E}
(f : p →L[𝕜] F) [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 (LinearMap.range f)] :
∃ g : E →L[𝕜] F, f = g.comp p.subtypeL := by
letI : RCLike 𝕜 := IsRCLikeNormedField.rclike 𝕜
set b := Module.finBasis 𝕜 (LinearMap.range f)
set e := b.equivFunL
set fi := fun i ↦ (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (b.coord i)).comp
(f.codRestrict _ <| LinearMap.mem_range_self _)
choose gi hgf _ using fun i ↦ exists_extension_norm_eq p (fi i)
use (LinearMap.range f).subtypeL.comp <| e.symm.toContinuousLinearMap.comp (.pi gi)
ext x
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/HahnBanach/Extension.lean | 114 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Finite intervals of positive naturals
This file proves that `ℕ+` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
-/
open Finset Function PNat
namespace PNat
variable (a b : ℕ+)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℕ+ := Subtype.instLocallyFiniteOrder _
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).subtype fun n : ℕ => 0 < n :=
rfl
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).subtype fun n : ℕ => 0 < n :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).subtype fun n : ℕ => 0 < n :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).subtype fun n : ℕ => 0 < n :=
rfl
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).subtype fun n : ℕ => 0 < n := rfl
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map (Embedding.subtype _) = Icc ↑a ↑b :=
Finset.map_subtype_embedding_Icc _ _ _ fun _c _ _x hx _ hc _ => hc.trans_le hx
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map (Embedding.subtype _) = Ico ↑a ↑b :=
Finset.map_subtype_embedding_Ico _ _ _ fun _c _ _x hx _ hc _ => hc.trans_le hx
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map (Embedding.subtype _) = Ioc ↑a ↑b :=
Finset.map_subtype_embedding_Ioc _ _ _ fun _c _ _x hx _ hc _ => hc.trans_le hx
theorem map_subtype_embedding_Ioo : (Ioo a b).map (Embedding.subtype _) = Ioo ↑a ↑b :=
Finset.map_subtype_embedding_Ioo _ _ _ fun _c _ _x hx _ hc _ => hc.trans_le hx
theorem map_subtype_embedding_uIcc : (uIcc a b).map (Embedding.subtype _) = uIcc ↑a ↑b :=
map_subtype_embedding_Icc _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : #(Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [← Nat.card_Icc, ← map_subtype_embedding_Icc, card_map]
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : #(Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [← Nat.card_Ico, ← map_subtype_embedding_Ico, card_map]
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : #(Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [← Nat.card_Ioc, ← map_subtype_embedding_Ioc, card_map]
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : #(Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_Ioo, ← map_subtype_embedding_Ioo, card_map]
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : #(uIcc a b) = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_uIcc, ← map_subtype_embedding_uIcc, card_map]
theorem card_fintype_Icc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [← card_Icc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
theorem card_fintype_Ico : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [← card_Ico, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
theorem card_fintype_Ioc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [← card_Ioc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
theorem card_fintype_Ioo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [← card_Ioo, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
theorem card_fintype_uIcc : Fintype.card (Set.uIcc a b) = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 := by
rw [← card_uIcc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
end PNat
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Interval.lean | 94 | 99 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
/-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` within a set `S`, comparing two variables near `x₀`
instead of comparing only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` comparing two variables near `x₀` instead of comparing
only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Uniform equicontinuity on a subset implies equicontinuity on that subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` is continuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of an equicontinuous family is continuous. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous on `S` is continuous on `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
/-- Each function of a family uniformly equicontinuous on `S` is uniformly continuous on `S`. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point within a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous at `x₀`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous
at `x₀` within `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous on `S`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly
equicontinuous on `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous at `x₀` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is very useful for
developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous on `S` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is
uniformly continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*.
This is very useful for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly
for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is uniformly continuous on `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*. This is very useful
for developing the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
| Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 546 | 549 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `IsCauSeq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
* `CauSeq`: the type of Cauchy sequences valued in type `β` with respect to an absolute value
function `abv`.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing Module
variable {α β : Type*}
open IsAbsoluteValue
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
(abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ →
abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma {ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ → abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ →
abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε := by
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _)
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0
refine ⟨_, εK, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _))
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _))
set M := max 1 (max K₁ K₂)
have : abv (a₁ - b₁) * abv b₂ + abv (a₂ - b₂) * abv a₁ < ε / 2 / M * M + ε / 2 / M * M := by
gcongr
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b → abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε := by
refine ⟨K * ε * K, mul_pos (mul_pos K0 ε0) K0, fun {a b} ha hb h => ?_⟩
have a0 := K0.trans_le ha
have b0 := K0.trans_le hb
| rw [inv_sub_inv' ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0), abv_mul abv, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv,
abv_inv abv, abv_sub abv]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ b0.le) a0.le
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ b0.ne', ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ a0.ne', one_mul]
refine h.trans_le ?_
gcongr
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsCauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Basic.lean | 73 | 84 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Baire.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Pointwise
/-! # Open mapping theorem for morphisms of topological groups
We prove that a continuous surjective group morphism from a sigma-compact group to a locally compact
group is automatically open, in `MonoidHom.isOpenMap_of_sigmaCompact`.
We deduce this from a similar statement for the orbits of continuous actions of sigma-compact groups
on Baire spaces, given in `isOpenMap_smul_of_sigmaCompact`.
Note that a sigma-compactness assumption is necessary. Indeed, let `G` be the real line with
the discrete topology, and `H` the real line with the usual topology. Both are locally compact
groups, and the identity from `G` to `H` is continuous but not open.
-/
open scoped Topology Pointwise
open MulAction Set Function
variable {G X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalSpace X]
[Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [MulAction G X]
[SigmaCompactSpace G] [BaireSpace X] [T2Space X]
[ContinuousSMul G X] [IsPretransitive G X]
/-- Consider a sigma-compact group acting continuously and transitively on a Baire space. Then
the orbit map is open around the identity. It follows in `isOpenMap_smul_of_sigmaCompact` that it
is open around any point. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sigma-compact additive group acting continuously and transitively on a
Baire space. Then the orbit map is open around zero. It follows in
`isOpenMap_vadd_of_sigmaCompact` that it is open around any point."]
theorem smul_singleton_mem_nhds_of_sigmaCompact
{U : Set G} (hU : U ∈ 𝓝 1) (x : X) : U • {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by
/- Consider a small closed neighborhood `V` of the identity. Then the group is covered by
countably many translates of `V`, say `gᵢ V`. Let also `Kₙ` be a sequence of compact sets covering
the space. Then the image of `Kₙ ∩ gᵢ V` in the orbit is compact, and their unions covers the
space. By Baire, one of them has nonempty interior. Then `gᵢ V • x` has nonempty interior, and
so does `V • x`. Its interior contains a point `g' x` with `g' ∈ V`. Then `g'⁻¹ • V • x` contains
a neighborhood of `x`, and it is included in `V⁻¹ • V • x`, which is itself contained in `U • x`
if `V` is small enough. -/
obtain ⟨V, V_mem, V_closed, V_symm, VU⟩ : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), IsClosed V ∧ V⁻¹ = V ∧ V * V ⊆ U :=
exists_closed_nhds_one_inv_eq_mul_subset hU
obtain ⟨s, s_count, hs⟩ : ∃ (s : Set G), s.Countable ∧ ⋃ g ∈ s, g • V = univ :=
countable_cover_nhds_of_sigmaCompact fun _ ↦ by simpa
let K : ℕ → Set G := compactCovering G
let F : ℕ × s → Set X := fun p ↦ (K p.1 ∩ (p.2 : G) • V) • ({x} : Set X)
obtain ⟨⟨n, ⟨g, hg⟩⟩, hi⟩ : ∃ i, (interior (F i)).Nonempty := by
have : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
have : Encodable s := Countable.toEncodable s_count
apply nonempty_interior_of_iUnion_of_closed
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨g, hg⟩⟩
apply IsCompact.isClosed
suffices H : IsCompact ((fun (g : G) ↦ g • x) '' (K n ∩ g • V)) by
simpa only [F, smul_singleton] using H
apply IsCompact.image
· exact (isCompact_compactCovering G n).inter_right (V_closed.smul g)
· exact continuous_id.smul continuous_const
· apply eq_univ_iff_forall.2 (fun y ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨h, rfl⟩ : ∃ h, h • x = y := exists_smul_eq G x y
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, h ∈ K n := exists_mem_compactCovering h
obtain ⟨g, gs, hg⟩ : ∃ g ∈ s, h ∈ g • V := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top s _ hs _
simp only [F, smul_singleton, mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_inter_iff, Prod.exists,
Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
exact ⟨n, g, gs, h, ⟨hn, hg⟩, rfl⟩
have I : (interior ((g • V) • {x})).Nonempty := by
apply hi.mono
apply interior_mono
exact smul_subset_smul_right inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : (interior (V • ({x} : Set X))).Nonempty := by
rw [smul_assoc, interior_smul] at I
exact smul_set_nonempty.1 I
obtain ⟨g', hg', rfl⟩ : ∃ g' ∈ V, g' • x = y := by simpa using interior_subset hy
have J : (g' ⁻¹ • V) • {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by
apply mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1
rwa [smul_assoc, interior_smul, mem_inv_smul_set_iff]
have : (g'⁻¹ • V) • {x} ⊆ U • ({x} : Set X) := by
apply smul_subset_smul_right
apply Subset.trans (smul_set_subset_smul (inv_mem_inv.2 hg')) ?_
rw [V_symm]
exact VU
exact Filter.mem_of_superset J this
/-- Consider a sigma-compact group acting continuously and transitively on a Baire space. Then
the orbit map is open. This is a version of the open mapping theorem, valid notably for the
action of a sigma-compact locally compact group on a locally compact space. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sigma-compact additive group acting continuously and transitively on a
Baire space. Then the orbit map is open. This is a version of the open mapping theorem, valid
notably for the action of a sigma-compact locally compact group on a locally compact space."]
theorem isOpenMap_smul_of_sigmaCompact (x : X) : IsOpenMap (fun (g : G) ↦ g • x) := by
/- We have already proved the theorem around the basepoint of the orbit, in
| `smul_singleton_mem_nhds_of_sigmaCompact`. The general statement follows around an arbitrary
point by changing basepoints. -/
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Filter.le_map_iff]
intro g U hU
have : (· • x) = (· • (g • x)) ∘ (· * g⁻¹) := by
ext g
simp [smul_smul]
rw [this, image_comp, ← smul_singleton]
apply smul_singleton_mem_nhds_of_sigmaCompact
simpa using isOpenMap_mul_right g⁻¹ |>.image_mem_nhds hU
/-- A surjective morphism of topological groups is open when the source group is sigma-compact and
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Group/OpenMapping.lean | 96 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift : Type extends ℝ →o ℝ where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one _ := rfl
one_mul _ := rfl
mul_assoc _ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => x.toAdd + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
| -/
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 346 | 348 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Lattice
/-!
# Successor and predecessor limits
We define the predicate `Order.IsSuccPrelimit` for "successor pre-limits", values that don't cover
any others. They are so named since they can't be the successors of anything smaller. We define
`Order.IsPredPrelimit` analogously, and prove basic results.
For some applications, it is desirable to exclude minimal elements from being successor limits, or
maximal elements from being predecessor limits. As such, we also provide `Order.IsSuccLimit` and
`Order.IsPredLimit`, which exclude these cases.
## TODO
The plan is to eventually replace `Ordinal.IsLimit` and `Cardinal.IsLimit` with the common
predicate `Order.IsSuccLimit`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {a b : α}
namespace Order
open Function Set OrderDual
/-! ### Successor limits -/
section LT
variable [LT α]
/-- A successor pre-limit is a value that doesn't cover any other.
It's so named because in a successor order, a successor pre-limit can't be the successor of anything
smaller.
Use `IsSuccLimit` if you want to exclude the case of a minimal element. -/
def IsSuccPrelimit (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ b, ¬b ⋖ a
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit_iff_exists_covBy (a : α) : ¬IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ ∃ b, b ⋖ a := by
simp [IsSuccPrelimit]
@[simp]
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.of_dense [DenselyOrdered α] (a : α) : IsSuccPrelimit a := fun _ => not_covBy
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A successor limit is a value that isn't minimal and doesn't cover any other.
It's so named because in a successor order, a successor limit can't be the successor of anything
smaller.
This previously allowed the element to be minimal. This usage is now covered by `IsSuccPrelimit`. -/
def IsSuccLimit (a : α) : Prop :=
¬ IsMin a ∧ IsSuccPrelimit a
protected theorem IsSuccLimit.not_isMin (h : IsSuccLimit a) : ¬ IsMin a := h.1
protected theorem IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit (h : IsSuccLimit a) : IsSuccPrelimit a := h.2
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.isSuccLimit_of_not_isMin (h : IsSuccPrelimit a) (ha : ¬ IsMin a) :
IsSuccLimit a :=
⟨ha, h⟩
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.isSuccLimit [NoMinOrder α] (h : IsSuccPrelimit a) : IsSuccLimit a :=
h.isSuccLimit_of_not_isMin (not_isMin a)
theorem isSuccPrelimit_iff_isSuccLimit_of_not_isMin (h : ¬ IsMin a) :
IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ IsSuccLimit a :=
⟨fun ha ↦ ha.isSuccLimit_of_not_isMin h, IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_iff_isSuccLimit [NoMinOrder α] : IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ IsSuccLimit a :=
isSuccPrelimit_iff_isSuccLimit_of_not_isMin (not_isMin a)
protected theorem _root_.IsMin.not_isSuccLimit (h : IsMin a) : ¬ IsSuccLimit a :=
fun ha ↦ ha.not_isMin h
protected theorem _root_.IsMin.isSuccPrelimit : IsMin a → IsSuccPrelimit a := fun h _ hab =>
not_isMin_of_lt hab.lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_bot [OrderBot α] : IsSuccPrelimit (⊥ : α) :=
isMin_bot.isSuccPrelimit
theorem not_isSuccLimit_bot [OrderBot α] : ¬ IsSuccLimit (⊥ : α) :=
isMin_bot.not_isSuccLimit
theorem IsSuccLimit.ne_bot [OrderBot α] (h : IsSuccLimit a) : a ≠ ⊥ := by
rintro rfl
exact not_isSuccLimit_bot h
theorem not_isSuccLimit_iff : ¬ IsSuccLimit a ↔ IsMin a ∨ ¬ IsSuccPrelimit a := by
rw [IsSuccLimit, not_and_or, not_not]
variable [SuccOrder α]
protected theorem IsSuccPrelimit.isMax (h : IsSuccPrelimit (succ a)) : IsMax a := by
by_contra H
exact h a (covBy_succ_of_not_isMax H)
protected theorem IsSuccLimit.isMax (h : IsSuccLimit (succ a)) : IsMax a :=
h.isSuccPrelimit.isMax
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬ IsMax a) : ¬ IsSuccPrelimit (succ a) :=
mt IsSuccPrelimit.isMax ha
theorem not_isSuccLimit_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬ IsMax a) : ¬ IsSuccLimit (succ a) :=
mt IsSuccLimit.isMax ha
/-- Given `j < i` with `i` a prelimit, `IsSuccPrelimit.mid` picks an arbitrary element strictly
between `j` and `i`. -/
noncomputable def IsSuccPrelimit.mid {i j : α} (hi : IsSuccPrelimit i) (hj : j < i) :
Ioo j i :=
Classical.indefiniteDescription _ ((not_covBy_iff hj).mp <| hi j)
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.succ_ne (h : IsSuccPrelimit a) (b : α) : succ b ≠ a := by
rintro rfl
exact not_isMax _ h.isMax
theorem IsSuccLimit.succ_ne (h : IsSuccLimit a) (b : α) : succ b ≠ a :=
h.isSuccPrelimit.succ_ne b
@[simp]
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit_succ (a : α) : ¬IsSuccPrelimit (succ a) := fun h => h.succ_ne _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_isSuccLimit_succ (a : α) : ¬IsSuccLimit (succ a) := fun h => h.succ_ne _ rfl
end NoMaxOrder
section IsSuccArchimedean
variable [IsSuccArchimedean α] [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.isMin_of_noMax (h : IsSuccPrelimit a) : IsMin a := by
intro b hb
rcases hb.exists_succ_iterate with ⟨_ | n, rfl⟩
· exact le_rfl
· rw [iterate_succ_apply'] at h
exact (not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ h).elim
@[simp]
theorem isSuccPrelimit_iff_of_noMax : IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ IsMin a :=
⟨IsSuccPrelimit.isMin_of_noMax, IsMin.isSuccPrelimit⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_noMax : ¬ IsSuccLimit a :=
fun h ↦ h.not_isMin h.isSuccPrelimit.isMin_of_noMax
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit_of_noMax [NoMinOrder α] : ¬ IsSuccPrelimit a := by simp
end IsSuccArchimedean
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
theorem isSuccLimit_iff [OrderBot α] : IsSuccLimit a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ ∧ IsSuccPrelimit a := by
rw [IsSuccLimit, isMin_iff_eq_bot]
theorem IsSuccLimit.bot_lt [OrderBot α] (h : IsSuccLimit a) : ⊥ < a :=
h.ne_bot.bot_lt
variable [SuccOrder α]
theorem isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_ne (h : ∀ b, succ b ≠ a) : IsSuccPrelimit a := fun b hba =>
h b (CovBy.succ_eq hba)
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit_iff : ¬ IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ ∃ b, ¬ IsMax b ∧ succ b = a := by
rw [not_isSuccPrelimit_iff_exists_covBy]
refine exists_congr fun b => ⟨fun hba => ⟨hba.lt.not_isMax, (CovBy.succ_eq hba)⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h, rfl⟩
exact covBy_succ_of_not_isMax h
/-- See `not_isSuccPrelimit_iff` for a version that states that `a` is a successor of a value other
than itself. -/
theorem mem_range_succ_of_not_isSuccPrelimit (h : ¬ IsSuccPrelimit a) :
a ∈ range (succ : α → α) := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := not_isSuccPrelimit_iff.1 h
exact ⟨b, hb.2⟩
theorem mem_range_succ_or_isSuccPrelimit (a) : a ∈ range (succ : α → α) ∨ IsSuccPrelimit a :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.2 <| mem_range_succ_of_not_isSuccPrelimit
theorem isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit (a) :
IsMin a ∨ a ∈ range (succ : α → α) ∨ IsSuccLimit a := by
rw [IsSuccLimit]
have := mem_range_succ_or_isSuccPrelimit a
tauto
theorem isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt (H : ∀ a < b, succ a < b) : IsSuccPrelimit b := fun a hab =>
(H a hab.lt).ne (CovBy.succ_eq hab)
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.succ_lt (hb : IsSuccPrelimit b) (ha : a < b) : succ a < b := by
by_cases h : IsMax a
· rwa [h.succ_eq]
· rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax h]
refine ⟨ha, fun hab => ?_⟩
subst hab
exact (h hb.isMax).elim
theorem IsSuccLimit.succ_lt (hb : IsSuccLimit b) (ha : a < b) : succ a < b :=
hb.isSuccPrelimit.succ_lt ha
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.succ_lt_iff (hb : IsSuccPrelimit b) : succ a < b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => (le_succ a).trans_lt h, hb.succ_lt⟩
theorem IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff (hb : IsSuccLimit b) : succ a < b ↔ a < b :=
hb.isSuccPrelimit.succ_lt_iff
theorem isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt : IsSuccPrelimit b ↔ ∀ a < b, succ a < b :=
⟨fun hb _ => hb.succ_lt, isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt⟩
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_ne : IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ ∀ b, succ b ≠ a :=
⟨IsSuccPrelimit.succ_ne, isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_ne⟩
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit_iff' : ¬ IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ a ∈ range (succ : α → α) := by
simp_rw [isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_ne, not_forall, not_ne_iff, mem_range]
end NoMaxOrder
section IsSuccArchimedean
variable [IsSuccArchimedean α]
protected theorem IsSuccPrelimit.isMin (h : IsSuccPrelimit a) : IsMin a := fun b hb => by
revert h
refine Succ.rec (fun _ => le_rfl) (fun c _ H hc => ?_) hb
have := hc.isMax.succ_eq
rw [this] at hc ⊢
exact H hc
@[simp]
theorem isSuccPrelimit_iff : IsSuccPrelimit a ↔ IsMin a :=
⟨IsSuccPrelimit.isMin, IsMin.isSuccPrelimit⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_isSuccLimit : ¬ IsSuccLimit a :=
fun h ↦ h.not_isMin <| h.isSuccPrelimit.isMin
theorem not_isSuccPrelimit [NoMinOrder α] : ¬ IsSuccPrelimit a := by simp
end IsSuccArchimedean
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.le_iff_forall_le (h : IsSuccPrelimit a) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ c < a, c ≤ b := by
use fun ha c hc ↦ hc.le.trans ha
intro H
by_contra! ha
exact h b ⟨ha, fun c hb hc ↦ (H c hc).not_lt hb⟩
theorem IsSuccLimit.le_iff_forall_le (h : IsSuccLimit a) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ c < a, c ≤ b :=
h.isSuccPrelimit.le_iff_forall_le
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.lt_iff_exists_lt (h : IsSuccPrelimit b) : a < b ↔ ∃ c < b, a < c := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp [h.le_iff_forall_le]
theorem IsSuccLimit.lt_iff_exists_lt (h : IsSuccLimit b) : a < b ↔ ∃ c < b, a < c :=
h.isSuccPrelimit.lt_iff_exists_lt
lemma _root_.IsLUB.isSuccPrelimit_of_not_mem {s : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ha : a ∉ s) :
IsSuccPrelimit a := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc, hca⟩ := hs.exists_between hb.lt
obtain rfl := (hb.ge_of_gt hbc).antisymm hca
contradiction
lemma _root_.IsLUB.mem_of_not_isSuccPrelimit {s : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ha : ¬IsSuccPrelimit a) :
a ∈ s :=
ha.imp_symm hs.isSuccPrelimit_of_not_mem
lemma _root_.IsLUB.isSuccLimit_of_not_mem {s : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hs' : s.Nonempty)
(ha : a ∉ s) : IsSuccLimit a := by
refine ⟨?_, hs.isSuccPrelimit_of_not_mem ha⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hs'
obtain rfl | hb := (hs.1 hb).eq_or_lt
· contradiction
· exact hb.not_isMin
lemma _root_.IsLUB.mem_of_not_isSuccLimit {s : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hs' : s.Nonempty)
(ha : ¬IsSuccLimit a) : a ∈ s :=
ha.imp_symm <| hs.isSuccLimit_of_not_mem hs'
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.isLUB_Iio (ha : IsSuccPrelimit a) : IsLUB (Iio a) a := by
refine ⟨fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, fun b hb ↦ le_of_forall_lt fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨d, hd, hd'⟩ := ha.lt_iff_exists_lt.1 hc
exact hd'.trans_le (hb hd)
theorem IsSuccLimit.isLUB_Iio (ha : IsSuccLimit a) : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
ha.isSuccPrelimit.isLUB_Iio
theorem isLUB_Iio_iff_isSuccPrelimit : IsLUB (Iio a) a ↔ IsSuccPrelimit a := by
refine ⟨fun ha b hb ↦ ?_, IsSuccPrelimit.isLUB_Iio⟩
rw [hb.Iio_eq] at ha
obtain rfl := isLUB_Iic.unique ha
cases hb.lt.false
variable [SuccOrder α]
theorem IsSuccPrelimit.le_succ_iff (hb : IsSuccPrelimit b) : b ≤ succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 hb.succ_lt_iff
theorem IsSuccLimit.le_succ_iff (hb : IsSuccLimit b) : b ≤ succ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
hb.isSuccPrelimit.le_succ_iff
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Predecessor limits -/
section LT
variable [LT α]
/-- A predecessor pre-limit is a value that isn't covered by any other.
It's so named because in a predecessor order, a predecessor pre-limit can't be the predecessor of
anything smaller.
Use `IsPredLimit` to exclude the case of a maximal element. -/
def IsPredPrelimit (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ b, ¬ a ⋖ b
theorem not_isPredPrelimit_iff_exists_covBy (a : α) : ¬IsPredPrelimit a ↔ ∃ b, a ⋖ b := by
simp [IsPredPrelimit]
@[simp]
theorem IsPredPrelimit.of_dense [DenselyOrdered α] (a : α) : IsPredPrelimit a := fun _ => not_covBy
@[simp]
theorem isSuccPrelimit_toDual_iff : IsSuccPrelimit (toDual a) ↔ IsPredPrelimit a := by
simp [IsSuccPrelimit, IsPredPrelimit]
@[simp]
theorem isPredPrelimit_toDual_iff : IsPredPrelimit (toDual a) ↔ IsSuccPrelimit a := by
simp [IsSuccPrelimit, IsPredPrelimit]
alias ⟨_, IsPredPrelimit.dual⟩ := isSuccPrelimit_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsSuccPrelimit.dual⟩ := isPredPrelimit_toDual_iff
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A predecessor limit is a value that isn't maximal and doesn't cover any other.
|
It's so named because in a predecessor order, a predecessor limit can't be the predecessor of
anything larger.
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Limit.lean | 375 | 377 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Ineq
/-!
# Lemmas for `linarith`.
Those in the `Linarith` namespace should stay here.
Those outside the `Linarith` namespace may be deleted as they are ported to mathlib4.
-/
namespace Linarith
universe u
theorem lt_irrefl {α : Type u} [Preorder α] {a : α} : ¬a < a := _root_.lt_irrefl a
theorem eq_of_eq_of_eq {α} [Semiring α] {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b = 0 := by
simp [*]
section Semiring
variable {α : Type u} [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α]
theorem zero_lt_one [IsStrictOrderedRing α] : (0:α) < 1 :=
_root_.zero_lt_one
theorem le_of_eq_of_le {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b ≤ 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {a b : α} (ha : a = 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem le_of_le_of_eq {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b ≤ 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {a b : α} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b = 0) : a + b < 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem add_nonpos [IsOrderedRing α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) :
a + b ≤ 0 :=
_root_.add_nonpos ha hb
| theorem add_lt_of_le_of_neg [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a < 0) : b + a < c :=
| Mathlib/Tactic/Linarith/Lemmas.lean | 52 | 53 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.