Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Charpoly.ToMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Minpoly
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
/-!
# Results on the eigenvalue 0
In this file we provide equivalent characterizations of properties related to the eigenvalue 0,
such as being nilpotent, having determinant equal to 0, having a non-trivial kernel, etc...
## Main results
* `LinearMap.charpoly_nilpotent_tfae`:
equivalent characterizations of nilpotent endomorphisms
* `LinearMap.hasEigenvalue_zero_tfae`:
equivalent characterizations of endomorphisms with eigenvalue 0
* `LinearMap.not_hasEigenvalue_zero_tfae`:
endomorphisms without eigenvalue 0
* `LinearMap.finrank_maxGenEigenspace`:
the dimension of the maximal generalized eigenspace of an endomorphism
is the trailing degree of its characteristic polynomial
-/
variable {R K M : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [Field K] [AddCommGroup M]
variable [Module R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R M]
variable [Module K M] [Module.Finite K M]
open Module Module.Free Polynomial
lemma IsNilpotent.charpoly_eq_X_pow_finrank {φ : Module.End R M} (h : IsNilpotent φ) :
φ.charpoly = X ^ finrank R M := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply IsNilpotent.eq_zero
rw [finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
apply Matrix.isNilpotent_charpoly_sub_pow_of_isNilpotent
exact h.map (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv (chooseBasis R M))
namespace LinearMap
| lemma isNilpotent_iff_charpoly (φ : End R M) :
IsNilpotent φ ↔ charpoly φ = X ^ finrank R M :=
⟨IsNilpotent.charpoly_eq_X_pow_finrank,
fun h ↦ ⟨finrank R M, by rw [← @aeval_X_pow R, ← h, aeval_self_charpoly φ]⟩⟩
open Module.Free in
lemma charpoly_nilpotent_tfae [IsNoetherian R M] (φ : Module.End R M) :
List.TFAE [
IsNilpotent φ,
φ.charpoly = X ^ finrank R M,
∀ m : M, ∃ (n : ℕ), (φ ^ n) m = 0,
natTrailingDegree φ.charpoly = finrank R M ] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := IsNilpotent.charpoly_eq_X_pow_finrank
tfae_have 2 → 3
| h, m => by
use finrank R M
suffices φ ^ finrank R M = 0 by simp only [this, LinearMap.zero_apply]
simpa only [h, map_pow, aeval_X] using φ.aeval_self_charpoly
tfae_have 3 → 1
| h => by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Filter.eventually_atTop.mp <| φ.eventually_iSup_ker_pow_eq
use n
ext x
rw [zero_apply, ← mem_ker, ← hn n le_rfl]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h x
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Eigenspace/Zero.lean | 49 | 73 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Merten. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Galois.Decomposition
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IndYoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Ulift
/-!
# Pro-Representability of fiber functors
We show that any fiber functor is pro-representable, i.e. there exists a pro-object
`X : I ⥤ C` such that `F` is naturally isomorphic to the colimit of `X ⋙ coyoneda`.
From this we deduce the canonical isomorphism of `Aut F` with the limit over the automorphism
groups of all Galois objects.
## Main definitions
- `PointedGaloisObject`: the category of pointed Galois objects
- `PointedGaloisObject.cocone`: a cocone on `(PointedGaloisObject.incl F).op ≫ coyoneda` with
point `F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl`.
- `autGaloisSystem`: the system of automorphism groups indexed by the pointed Galois objects.
## Main results
- `PointedGaloisObject.isColimit`: the cocone `PointedGaloisObject.cocone` is a colimit cocone.
- `autMulEquivAutGalois`: `Aut F` is canonically isomorphic to the limit over the automorphism
groups of all Galois objects.
- `FiberFunctor.isPretransitive_of_isConnected`: The `Aut F` action on the fiber of a connected
object is transitive.
## Implementation details
The pro-representability statement and the isomorphism of `Aut F` with the limit over the
automorphism groups of all Galois objects naturally forces `F` to take values in `FintypeCat.{u₂}`
where `u₂` is the `Hom`-universe of `C`. Since this is used to show that `Aut F` acts
transitively on `F.obj X` for connected `X`, we a priori only obtain this result for
the mentioned specialized universe setup. To obtain the result for `F` taking values in an arbitrary
`FintypeCat.{w}`, we postcompose with an equivalence `FintypeCat.{w} ≌ FintypeCat.{u₂}` and apply
the specialized result.
In the following the section `Specialized` is reserved for the setup where `F` takes values in
`FintypeCat.{u₂}` and the section `General` contains results holding for `F` taking values in
an arbitrary `FintypeCat.{w}`.
## References
* [lenstraGSchemes]: H. W. Lenstra. Galois theory for schemes.
-/
universe u₁ u₂ w
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace PreGaloisCategory
open Limits Functor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{u₂} C] [GaloisCategory C]
/-- A pointed Galois object is a Galois object with a fixed point of its fiber. -/
structure PointedGaloisObject (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w}) : Type (max u₁ u₂ w) where
/-- The underlying object of `C`. -/
obj : C
/-- An element of the fiber of `obj`. -/
pt : F.obj obj
/-- `obj` is Galois. -/
isGalois : IsGalois obj := by infer_instance
namespace PointedGaloisObject
section General
variable (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{w})
attribute [instance] isGalois
instance (X : PointedGaloisObject F) : CoeDep (PointedGaloisObject F) X C where
coe := X.obj
variable {F} in
/-- The type of homomorphisms between two pointed Galois objects. This is a homomorphism
of the underlying objects of `C` that maps the distinguished points to each other. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : PointedGaloisObject F) where
/-- The underlying homomorphism of `C`. -/
val : A.obj ⟶ B.obj
/-- The distinguished point of `A` is mapped to the distinguished point of `B`. -/
comp : F.map val A.pt = B.pt := by simp
attribute [simp] Hom.comp
/-- The category of pointed Galois objects. -/
instance : Category.{u₂} (PointedGaloisObject F) where
Hom A B := Hom A B
id A := { val := 𝟙 (A : C) }
comp {A B C} f g := { val := f.val ≫ g.val }
instance {A B : PointedGaloisObject F} : Coe (Hom A B) (A.obj ⟶ B.obj) where
coe f := f.val
variable {F}
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {A B : PointedGaloisObject F} {f g : A ⟶ B} (h : f.val = g.val) : f = g :=
Hom.ext h
@[simp]
lemma id_val (A : PointedGaloisObject F) : 𝟙 A = 𝟙 A.obj :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma comp_val {A B C : PointedGaloisObject F} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C) :
(f ≫ g).val = f.val ≫ g.val :=
rfl
variable (F)
/-- The canonical functor from pointed Galois objects to `C`. -/
def incl : PointedGaloisObject F ⥤ C where
obj := fun A ↦ A
map := fun ⟨f, _⟩ ↦ f
@[simp]
lemma incl_obj (A : PointedGaloisObject F) : (incl F).obj A = A :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma incl_map {A B : PointedGaloisObject F} (f : A ⟶ B) : (incl F).map f = f.val :=
rfl
end General
section Specialized
variable (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{u₂})
/-- `F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl` as a cocone over `(can F).op ⋙ coyoneda`.
This is a colimit cocone (see `PreGaloisCategory.isColimìt`) -/
def cocone : Cocone ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) where
pt := F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl
ι := {
app := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ↦ { app := fun X (f : (A : C) ⟶ X) ↦ F.map f a }
naturality := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ ⟨f, (hf : F.map f b = a)⟩ ↦ by
ext Y (g : (A : C) ⟶ Y)
suffices h : F.map g (F.map f b) = F.map g a by simpa
rw [hf]
}
@[simp]
lemma cocone_app (A : PointedGaloisObject F) (B : C) (f : (A : C) ⟶ B) :
((cocone F).ι.app ⟨A⟩).app B f = F.map f A.pt :=
rfl
variable [FiberFunctor F]
/-- The category of pointed Galois objects is cofiltered. -/
instance : IsCofilteredOrEmpty (PointedGaloisObject F) where
cone_objs := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ ↦ by
obtain ⟨Z, f, z, hgal, hfz⟩ := exists_hom_from_galois_of_fiber F (A ⨯ B)
<| (fiberBinaryProductEquiv F A B).symm (a, b)
refine ⟨⟨Z, z, hgal⟩, ⟨f ≫ prod.fst, ?_⟩, ⟨f ≫ prod.snd, ?_⟩, trivial⟩
· simp only [F.map_comp, hfz, FintypeCat.comp_apply, fiberBinaryProductEquiv_symm_fst_apply]
· simp only [F.map_comp, hfz, FintypeCat.comp_apply, fiberBinaryProductEquiv_symm_snd_apply]
cone_maps := fun ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ by
obtain ⟨Z, h, z, hgal, hhz⟩ := exists_hom_from_galois_of_fiber F A a
refine ⟨⟨Z, z, hgal⟩, ⟨h, hhz⟩, hom_ext ?_⟩
apply evaluation_injective_of_isConnected F Z B z
simp [hhz, hf, hg]
/-- `cocone F` is a colimit cocone, i.e. `F` is pro-represented by `incl F`. -/
noncomputable def isColimit : IsColimit (cocone F) := by
refine evaluationJointlyReflectsColimits _ (fun X ↦ ?_)
refine Types.FilteredColimit.isColimitOf _ _ ?_ ?_
· intro (x : F.obj X)
obtain ⟨Y, i, y, h1, _, _⟩ := fiber_in_connected_component F X x
obtain ⟨Z, f, z, hgal, hfz⟩ := exists_hom_from_galois_of_fiber F Y y
refine ⟨⟨Z, z, hgal⟩, f ≫ i, ?_⟩
simp only [mapCocone_ι_app, evaluation_obj_map, cocone_app, map_comp,
← h1, FintypeCat.comp_apply, hfz]
· intro ⟨A, a, _⟩ ⟨B, b, _⟩ (u : (A : C) ⟶ X) (v : (B : C) ⟶ X) (h : F.map u a = F.map v b)
obtain ⟨⟨Z, z, _⟩, ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, _⟩ :=
IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_objs (C := (PointedGaloisObject F)ᵒᵖ)
⟨{ obj := A, pt := a}⟩ ⟨{obj := B, pt := b}⟩
refine ⟨⟨{ obj := Z, pt := z }⟩, ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, ?_⟩
apply evaluation_injective_of_isConnected F Z X z
change F.map (f ≫ u) z = F.map (g ≫ v) z
rw [map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply, hf, map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply, hg, h]
instance : HasColimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) where
exists_colimit := ⟨cocone F, isColimit F⟩
end Specialized
end PointedGaloisObject
open PointedGaloisObject
section Specialized
variable (F : C ⥤ FintypeCat.{u₂})
/-- The diagram sending each pointed Galois object to its automorphism group
as an object of `C`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def autGaloisSystem : PointedGaloisObject F ⥤ Grp.{u₂} where
obj := fun A ↦ Grp.of <| Aut (A : C)
map := fun {A B} f ↦ Grp.ofHom (autMapHom f)
/-- The limit of `autGaloisSystem`. -/
noncomputable def AutGalois : Type (max u₁ u₂) :=
(autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _).sections
noncomputable instance : Group (AutGalois F) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Group (autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _).sections
/-- The canonical projection from `AutGalois F` to the `C`-automorphism group of each
pointed Galois object. -/
noncomputable def AutGalois.π (A : PointedGaloisObject F) : AutGalois F →* Aut (A : C) :=
Grp.sectionsπMonoidHom (autGaloisSystem F) A
/- Not a `simp` lemma, because we usually don't want to expose the internals here. -/
lemma AutGalois.π_apply (A : PointedGaloisObject F) (x : AutGalois F) :
AutGalois.π F A x = x.val A :=
rfl
lemma autGaloisSystem_map_surjective ⦃A B : PointedGaloisObject F⦄ (f : A ⟶ B) :
Function.Surjective ((autGaloisSystem F).map f) := by
intro (φ : Aut B.obj)
obtain ⟨ψ, hψ⟩ := autMap_surjective_of_isGalois f.val φ
use ψ
simp only [autGaloisSystem_map]
exact hψ
/-- Equality of elements of `AutGalois F` can be checked on the projections on each pointed
Galois object. -/
lemma AutGalois.ext {f g : AutGalois F}
(h : ∀ (A : PointedGaloisObject F), AutGalois.π F A f = AutGalois.π F A g) : f = g := by
dsimp only [AutGalois]
ext A
exact h A
variable [FiberFunctor F]
/-- `autGalois.π` is surjective for every pointed Galois object. -/
theorem AutGalois.π_surjective (A : PointedGaloisObject F) :
Function.Surjective (AutGalois.π F A) := fun (σ : Aut A.obj) ↦ by
have (i : PointedGaloisObject F) : Finite ((autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _).obj i) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Finite (Aut (i.obj))
exact eval_section_surjective_of_surjective
(autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget _) (autGaloisSystem_map_surjective F) A σ
section EndAutGaloisIsomorphism
/-!
### Isomorphism between `Aut F` and `AutGalois F`
In this section we establish the isomorphism between the automorphism group of `F` and
the limit over the automorphism groups of all Galois objects.
We first establish the isomorphism between `End F` and `AutGalois F`, from which we deduce that
`End F` is a group, hence `End F = Aut F`. The isomorphism is built in multiple steps:
- `endEquivSectionsFibers : End F ≅ (incl F ⋙ F').sections`: the endomorphisms of
`F` are isomorphic to the limit over `F.obj A` for all Galois objects `A`.
This is obtained as the composition (slightly simplified):
`End F ≅ (colimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) ⟶ F) ≅ (incl F ⋙ F).sections`
Where the first isomorphism is induced from the pro-representability of `F` and the second one
from the pro-coyoneda lemma.
- `endEquivAutGalois : End F ≅ AutGalois F`: this is the composition of `endEquivSectionsFibers`
with:
`(incl F ⋙ F).sections ≅ (autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget Grp).sections`
which is induced from the level-wise equivalence `Aut A ≃ F.obj A` for a Galois object `A`.
-/
-- Local notation for `F` considered as a functor to types instead of finite types.
local notation "F'" => F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl
/-- The endomorphisms of `F` are isomorphic to the limit over the fibers of `F` on all
Galois objects. -/
noncomputable def endEquivSectionsFibers : End F ≃ (incl F ⋙ F').sections :=
let i1 : End F ≃ End F' :=
(FullyFaithful.whiskeringRight (FullyFaithful.ofFullyFaithful FintypeCat.incl) C).homEquiv
let i2 : End F' ≅ (colimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) ⟶ F') :=
(yoneda.obj (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl)).mapIso (colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨cocone F, isColimit F⟩).op
let i3 : (colimit ((incl F).op ⋙ coyoneda) ⟶ F') ≅ limit ((incl F ⋙ F') ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}) :=
colimitCoyonedaHomIsoLimit' (incl F) F'
let i4 : limit (incl F ⋙ F' ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}) ≃ ((incl F ⋙ F') ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}).sections :=
Types.limitEquivSections (incl F ⋙ (F ⋙ FintypeCat.incl) ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁, u₂})
let i5 : ((incl F ⋙ F') ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁}).sections ≃ (incl F ⋙ F').sections :=
(Types.sectionsEquiv (incl F ⋙ F')).symm
i1.trans <| i2.toEquiv.trans <| i3.toEquiv.trans <| i4.trans i5
@[simp]
lemma endEquivSectionsFibers_π (f : End F) (A : PointedGaloisObject F) :
(endEquivSectionsFibers F f).val A = f.app A A.pt := by
dsimp [endEquivSectionsFibers, Types.sectionsEquiv]
erw [Types.limitEquivSections_apply]
simp only [colimitCoyonedaHomIsoLimit'_π_apply, incl_obj, comp_obj, FintypeCat.incl_obj, op_obj,
FunctorToTypes.comp]
change (((FullyFaithful.whiskeringRight (FullyFaithful.ofFullyFaithful
FintypeCat.incl) C).homEquiv) f).app A
(((colimit.ι _ _) ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨cocone F, isColimit F⟩).hom).app
A _) = f.app A A.pt
simp
rfl
/-- Functorial isomorphism `Aut A ≅ F.obj A` for Galois objects `A`. -/
noncomputable def autIsoFibers :
autGaloisSystem F ⋙ forget Grp ≅ incl F ⋙ F' :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun A ↦ ((evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A A.pt).toIso))
(fun {A B} f ↦ by
ext (φ : Aut A.obj)
dsimp
erw [evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_apply, evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_apply]
simp [-Hom.comp, ← f.comp])
lemma autIsoFibers_inv_app (A : PointedGaloisObject F) (b : F.obj A) :
(autIsoFibers F).inv.app A b = (evaluationEquivOfIsGalois F A A.pt).symm b :=
rfl
/-- The equivalence between endomorphisms of `F` and the limit over the automorphism groups
of all Galois objects. -/
noncomputable def endEquivAutGalois : End F ≃ AutGalois F :=
let e1 := endEquivSectionsFibers F
let e2 := ((Functor.sectionsFunctor _).mapIso (autIsoFibers F).symm).toEquiv
e1.trans e2
lemma endEquivAutGalois_π (f : End F) (A : PointedGaloisObject F) :
F.map (AutGalois.π F A (endEquivAutGalois F f)).hom A.pt = f.app A A.pt := by
dsimp [endEquivAutGalois, AutGalois.π_apply]
change F.map ((((sectionsFunctor _).map (autIsoFibers F).inv) _).val A).hom A.pt = _
dsimp [autIsoFibers]
simp only [endEquivSectionsFibers_π]
erw [evaluationEquivOfIsGalois_symm_fiber]
@[simp]
theorem endEquivAutGalois_mul (f g : End F) :
(endEquivAutGalois F) (g ≫ f) = (endEquivAutGalois F g) * (endEquivAutGalois F f) := by
refine AutGalois.ext F (fun A ↦ evaluation_aut_injective_of_isConnected F A A.pt ?_)
simp only [map_mul, endEquivAutGalois_π, Aut.Aut_mul_def, NatTrans.comp_app, Iso.trans_hom]
simp only [map_comp, FintypeCat.comp_apply, endEquivAutGalois_π]
change f.app A (g.app A A.pt) =
(f.app A ≫ F.map ((AutGalois.π F A) ((endEquivAutGalois F) g)).hom) A.pt
rw [← f.naturality, FintypeCat.comp_apply, endEquivAutGalois_π]
/-- The monoid isomorphism between endomorphisms of `F` and the (multiplicative opposite of the)
limit of automorphism groups of all Galois objects. -/
noncomputable def endMulEquivAutGalois : End F ≃* (AutGalois F)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
MulEquiv.mk (Equiv.trans (endEquivAutGalois F) MulOpposite.opEquiv) (by simp)
lemma endMulEquivAutGalois_pi (f : End F) (A : PointedGaloisObject F) :
F.map (AutGalois.π F A (endMulEquivAutGalois F f).unop).hom A.2 = f.app A A.pt :=
endEquivAutGalois_π F f A
/-- Any endomorphism of a fiber functor is a unit. -/
theorem FibreFunctor.end_isUnit (f : End F) : IsUnit f :=
(isUnit_map_iff (endMulEquivAutGalois F) _).mp
(Group.isUnit ((endMulEquivAutGalois F) f))
/-- Any endomorphism of a fiber functor is an isomorphism. -/
| instance FibreFunctor.end_isIso (f : End F) : IsIso f := by
rw [← isUnit_iff_isIso]
exact FibreFunctor.end_isUnit F f
/-- The automorphism group of `F` is multiplicatively isomorphic to
(the multiplicative opposite of) the limit over the automorphism groups of
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Galois/Prorepresentability.lean | 374 | 379 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, rfl, h⟩
assumption
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
/-- The associated σ-algebra with a stopping time. -/
protected def measurableSpace (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : MeasurableSpace Ω where
MeasurableSet' s := ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})
measurableSet_empty i := (Set.empty_inter {ω | τ ω ≤ i}).symm ▸ @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
measurableSet_compl s hs i := by
rw [(_ : sᶜ ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = (sᶜ ∪ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ) ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· rw [← Set.compl_inter]
exact (hs i).compl
· exact hτ i
· rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
simp only [Set.compl_inter_self, Set.union_empty]
measurableSet_iUnion s hs i := by
rw [forall_swap] at hs
rw [Set.iUnion_inter]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (hs i)
protected theorem measurableSet (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ↔ ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem measurableSpace_mono (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (hle : τ ≤ π) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ hπ.measurableSpace := by
intro s hs i
rw [(_ : s ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i})]
· exact (hs i).inter (hπ i)
· ext
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and, and_congr_left_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
intro hle' _
exact le_trans (hle _) hle'
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, hx, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
theorem measurableSpace_le [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· haveI : IsEmpty Ω := ⟨fun ω => IsEmpty.false (τ ω)⟩
apply Subsingleton.measurableSet
· change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
obtain ⟨seq : ℕ → ι, h_seq_tendsto⟩ := (atTop : Filter ι).exists_seq_tendsto
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ seq n})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le (seq i) _ (hs (seq i))
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· intro hx
suffices ∃ i, τ ω ≤ seq i from ⟨this.choose, hx, this.choose_spec⟩
rw [tendsto_atTop] at h_seq_tendsto
exact (h_seq_tendsto (τ ω)).exists
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias measurableSpace_le' := measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℝ m} {τ : Ω → ℝ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
@[simp]
theorem measurableSpace_const (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace = f i := by
ext1 s
change MeasurableSet[(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace] s ↔ MeasurableSet[f i] s
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_false, Set.inter_empty, @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)]
theorem measurableSet_inter_eq_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) := by
have : ∀ j, {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {_ω | i ≤ j} := by
intro j
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hxi
rw [hxi]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [Set.inter_assoc, this, le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
rw [Set.inter_assoc, this]
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp [hij]
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ f i :=
(measurableSpace_mono hτ _ hτ_le).trans (measurableSpace_const _ _).le
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le_const hτ_le).trans (f.le n)
theorem le_measurableSpace_of_const_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) :
f i ≤ hτ.measurableSpace :=
(measurableSpace_const _ _).symm.le.trans (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ hτ_le)
end Preorder
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι]
[(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time_of_le {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι] {μ : Measure Ω}
{f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le hτ_le)) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
protected theorem measurableSet_le' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} := by
intro j
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (min_le_right i j) _ (hτ _)
protected theorem measurableSet_gt' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω : Ω | i < τ ω} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by ext1 ω; simp
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_eq' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i)
section Countable
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i ∈ Set.range τ, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun i _ => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω
constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, by simpa using hx⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, exists_and_right] at hx
exact hx.2.1
end Countable
protected theorem measurable [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] τ :=
@measurable_of_Iic ι Ω _ _ _ hτ.measurableSpace _ _ _ _ fun i => hτ.measurableSet_le' i
protected theorem measurable_of_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) : Measurable[f i] τ :=
hτ.measurable.mono (measurableSpace_le_of_le_const _ hτ_le) le_rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ hπ.measurableSpace := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· exact le_inf (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ fun _ => min_le_left _ _)
(measurableSpace_mono _ hπ fun _ => min_le_right _ _)
· intro s
change MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s →
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
have : ∀ i, {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∪ {ω | π ω ≤ i} := by
intro i; ext1 ω; simp
simp_rw [this, Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
exact fun h i => (h.left i).union (h.right i)
theorem measurableSet_min_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min hτ hπ]; rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} :
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ f i := by
rw [hτ.measurableSpace_min (isStoppingTime_const _ i), measurableSpace_const]
theorem measurableSet_min_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) {i : ι} :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[f i] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min_const hτ]; apply MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_inf
theorem measurableSet_inter_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π)
(s : Set Ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet] at hs ⊢
intro i
have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} =
s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} ∩
{ω | min (τ ω) i ≤ min (min (τ ω) (π ω)) i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [min_le_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff, le_refl, true_and,
true_or]
by_cases hτi : τ ω ≤ i
· simp only [hτi, true_or, and_true, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor <;> intro h
· exact Or.inl h
· rcases h with h | h
· exact h
· exact hτi.trans h
simp only [hτi, false_or, and_false, false_and, iff_false, not_and, not_le, and_imp]
refine fun _ hτ_le_π => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hτ_le_π
rw [← not_le]
exact hτi
rw [this]
refine ((hs i).inter ((hτ.min hπ) i)).inter ?_
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f i) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact ((hτ.min hπ).min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_iff [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
constructor <;> intro h
· have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self]
rw [this]
exact measurableSet_inter_le _ hπ _ h
· rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at h
exact h.1
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_min_iff hτ (isStoppingTime_const _ i),
IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_const, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h, ?_⟩, fun h j => h.1 j⟩
specialize h i
rwa [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self] at h
theorem measurableSet_le_stopping_time [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω | min (τ ω) j ≤ min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, min_le_iff, le_min_iff, le_refl,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
simp only [h, or_self_iff, and_true]
rw [Iff.comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact h.trans
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f j) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_stopping_time_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
suffices MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} by
rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at this; exact this.2
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}, ← hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_iff hπ, Set.univ_inter]
exact measurableSet_le_stopping_time hτ hπ
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time [AddGroup ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[MeasurableSub₂ ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hσ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hσ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time_of_countable [Countable ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hπ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hπ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end IsStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
/-! ## Stopped value and stopped process -/
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, its stopped value with respect to the stopping
time `τ` is the map `x ↦ u (τ ω) ω`. -/
def stoppedValue (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : Ω → β := fun ω => u (τ ω) ω
theorem stoppedValue_const (u : ι → Ω → β) (i : ι) : (stoppedValue u fun _ => i) = u i :=
rfl
variable [LinearOrder ι]
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, the stopped process with respect to `τ` is `u i ω` if
`i ≤ τ ω`, and `u (τ ω) ω` otherwise.
Intuitively, the stopped process stops evolving once the stopping time has occurred. -/
def stoppedProcess (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : ι → Ω → β := fun i ω => u (min i (τ ω)) ω
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_stoppedValue {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedProcess u τ = fun i => stoppedValue u fun ω => min i (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedProcess {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ σ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess u τ) σ = stoppedValue u fun ω => min (σ ω) (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_le {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : i ≤ τ ω) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u i ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_left h]
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : τ ω ≤ i) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u (τ ω) ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_right h]
section ProgMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
theorem progMeasurable_min_stopping_time [MetrizableSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => min i (τ ω) := by
intro i
let m_prod : MeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)
let m_set : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω), MeasurableSpace t := fun _ =>
@Subtype.instMeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) _ m_prod
let s := {p : Set.Iic i × Ω | τ p.2 ≤ i}
have hs : MeasurableSet[m_prod] s := @measurable_snd (Set.Iic i) Ω _ (f i) _ (hτ i)
have h_meas_fst : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω),
Measurable[m_set t] fun x : t => ((x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst : ι) :=
fun t => (@measurable_subtype_coe (Set.Iic i × Ω) m_prod _).fst.subtype_val
apply Measurable.stronglyMeasurable
refine measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs ?_ ?_
· refine @Measurable.min _ _ _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ _ (h_meas_fst s) ?_
refine @measurable_of_Iic ι s _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ fun j => ?_
have h_set_eq : (fun x : s => τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' Set.Iic j =
(fun x : s => (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' {ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iic, iff_and_self, le_min_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun _ => ω.prop
rw [h_set_eq]
suffices h_meas : @Measurable _ _ (m_set s) (f i) fun x : s ↦ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd from
h_meas (f.mono (min_le_left _ _) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (min i j)))
exact measurable_snd.comp (@measurable_subtype_coe _ m_prod _)
· letI sc := sᶜ
suffices h_min_eq_left :
(fun x : sc => min (↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst) (τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd)) = fun x : sc =>
↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [sc, Set.restrict, h_min_eq_left]
exact h_meas_fst _
ext1 ω
rw [min_eq_left]
have hx_fst_le : ↑(ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst ≤ i := (ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst.prop
refine hx_fst_le.trans (le_of_lt ?_)
convert ω.prop
simp only [sc, s, not_le, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : ProgMeasurable f (stoppedProcess u τ) :=
h.comp (progMeasurable_min_stopping_time hτ) fun _ _ => min_le_left _ _
theorem ProgMeasurable.adapted_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : Adapted f (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ) :=
(h.stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
theorem ProgMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι]
(hu : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ i) :=
(hu.adapted_stoppedProcess hτ i).mono (f.le _)
theorem stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le (h : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : StronglyMeasurable[f n] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have : stoppedValue u τ =
(fun p : Set.Iic n × Ω => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) ∘ fun ω => (⟨τ ω, hτ_le ω⟩, ω) := by
ext1 ω; simp only [stoppedValue, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [this]
refine StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable (h n) ?_
exact (hτ.measurable_of_le hτ_le).subtype_mk.prodMk measurable_id
theorem measurable_stoppedValue [MetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(hf_prog : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have h_str_meas : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[f i] (stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) := fun i =>
stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf_prog (hτ.min_const i) fun _ => min_le_right _ _
intro t ht i
suffices stoppedValue u τ ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} =
(stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} by
rw [this]; exact ((h_str_meas i).measurable ht).inter (hτ.measurableSet_le i)
ext1 ω
simp only [stoppedValue, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
rw [min_eq_left h]
end ProgMeasurable
end LinearOrder
section StoppedValueOfMemFinset
variable {μ : Measure Ω} {τ : Ω → ι} {E : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {u : ι → Ω → E}
theorem stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ s, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext y
classical
rw [stoppedValue, Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter]
suffices {i ∈ s | y ∈ {ω : Ω | τ ω = i}} = ({τ y} : Finset ι) by
rw [this, Finset.sum_singleton]
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_singleton]
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h.2.symm
· refine ⟨?_, h.symm⟩; rw [h]; exact hbdd y
theorem stoppedValue_eq' [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {N : ι}
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Iic N, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) :=
stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset [LinearOrder ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (n : ι)
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ s with i < n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_apply]
rcases le_or_lt n (τ ω) with h | h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_le h, Set.indicator_of_mem, Finset.sum_eq_zero, add_zero]
· intro m hm
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hm
exact (hm.2.trans_le h).ne'
· exact h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge (le_of_lt h), Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (τ ω)]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, zero_add, Set.indicator_of_mem] <;> rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact not_le.2 h
· rw [Finset.mem_filter]
exact ⟨hbdd ω h, h⟩
· intro b _ hneq
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact hneq.symm
theorem stoppedProcess_eq'' [LinearOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] (n : ι) :
stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ Finset.Iio n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
have h_mem : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ Finset.Iio n := fun ω h => Finset.mem_Iio.mpr h
rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset n h_mem]
congr with i
simp
section StoppedValue
variable [PartialOrder ι] {ℱ : Filtration ι m} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
|
theorem memLp_stoppedValue_of_mem_finset (hτ : IsStoppingTime ℱ τ) (hu : ∀ n, MemLp (u n) p μ)
{s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) : MemLp (stoppedValue u τ) p μ := by
rw [stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset hbdd]
refine memLp_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => MemLp.indicator ?_ (hu i)
refine ℱ.le i {a : Ω | τ a = i} (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range ?_ i)
refine ((Finset.finite_toSet s).subset fun ω hω => ?_).countable
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hω
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 855 | 862 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableSequence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Basic
/-!
# Borel sigma algebras on spaces with orders
## Main statements
* `borel_eq_generateFrom_Ixx` (where Ixx is one of {Iio, Ioi, Iic, Ici, Ico, Ioc}):
The Borel sigma algebra of a linear order topology is generated by intervals of the given kind.
* `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem`, `Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem`:
The Borel sigma algebra of a dense linear order topology is generated by intervals of a given
kind, with endpoints from dense subsets.
* `ext_of_Ico`, `ext_of_Ioc`:
A locally finite Borel measure on a second countable conditionally complete linear order is
characterized by the measures of intervals of the given kind.
* `ext_of_Iic`, `ext_of_Ici`:
A finite Borel measure on a second countable linear order is characterized by the measures of
intervals of the given kind.
* `UpperSemicontinuous.measurable`, `LowerSemicontinuous.measurable`:
Semicontinuous functions are measurable.
* `Measurable.iSup`, `Measurable.iInf`, `Measurable.sSup`, `Measurable.sInf`:
Countable supremums and infimums of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
* `Measurable.liminf`, `Measurable.limsup`:
Countable liminfs and limsups of measurable functions to conditionally complete linear orders
are measurable.
-/
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
section OrderTopology
variable (α)
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α]
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio : borel α = .generateFrom (range Iio) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_le ?_)
· rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_of_subbasis (@OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _)]
letI : MeasurableSpace α := MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iio)
have H : ∀ a : α, MeasurableSet (Iio a) := fun a => GenerateMeasurable.basic _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl | rfl⟩
· rcases em (∃ b, a ⋖ b) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hcovBy
· rw [hb.Ioi_eq, ← compl_Iio]
exact (H _).compl
· rcases isOpen_biUnion_countable (Ioi a) Ioi fun _ _ ↦ isOpen_Ioi with ⟨t, hat, htc, htU⟩
have : Ioi a = ⋃ b ∈ t, Ici b := by
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ <| iUnion₂_subset fun b hb ↦ Ici_subset_Ioi.2 (hat hb)
refine Subset.trans ?_ <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ ↦ Ioi_subset_Ici_self
simpa [CovBy, htU, subset_def] using hcovBy
simp only [this, ← compl_Iio]
exact .biUnion htc <| fun _ _ ↦ (H _).compl
· apply H
· rw [forall_mem_range]
intro a
exact GenerateMeasurable.basic _ isOpen_Iio
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi : borel α = .generateFrom (range Ioi) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio αᵒᵈ _ (by infer_instance : SecondCountableTopology α) _ _
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic :
borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Iic) := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
· refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun t ht => ?_
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := ht
rw [← compl_Ioi]
exact (MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_generateFrom (mem_range.mpr ⟨u, rfl⟩)).compl
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ici : borel α = MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (range Ici) :=
@borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end OrderTopology
section Orders
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
variable {mδ : MeasurableSpace δ}
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α} {μ : Measure α}
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a) :=
isClosed_Ici.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ici : NullMeasurableSet (Ici a) μ :=
measurableSet_Ici.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a) :=
isClosed_Iic.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Iic : NullMeasurableSet (Iic a) μ :=
measurableSet_Iic.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Icc a b) :=
isClosed_Icc.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Icc : NullMeasurableSet (Icc a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Icc.nullMeasurableSet
instance nhdsWithin_Ici_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ici b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ici.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Iic_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iic b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iic.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[Icc a b] x) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, nhdsWithin_inter]
infer_instance
instance atTop_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atTop : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Ici : MeasurableSet (Ici a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance atBot_isMeasurablyGenerated : (Filter.atBot : Filter α).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
@Filter.iInf_isMeasurablyGenerated _ _ _ _ fun a =>
(measurableSet_Iic : MeasurableSet (Iic a)).principal_isMeasurablyGenerated
instance [R1Space α] : IsMeasurablyGenerated (cocompact α) where
exists_measurable_subset := by
intro _ hs
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := mem_cocompact.mp hs
exact ⟨(closure t)ᶜ, ht.closure.compl_mem_cocompact, isClosed_closure.measurableSet.compl,
(compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure).trans hts⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {a b : α}
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le' : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.measurableSet
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_le {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } :=
hf.prodMk hg measurableSet_le'
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b x : α} {μ : Measure α}
-- we open this locale only here to avoid issues with list being treated as intervals above
open Interval
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Iio : MeasurableSet (Iio a) :=
isOpen_Iio.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Iio : NullMeasurableSet (Iio a) μ :=
measurableSet_Iio.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioi : MeasurableSet (Ioi a) :=
isOpen_Ioi.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioi : NullMeasurableSet (Ioi a) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Ioo a b) :=
isOpen_Ioo.measurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioo : NullMeasurableSet (Ioo a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioo.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc a b) :=
measurableSet_Ioi.inter measurableSet_Iic
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ioc : NullMeasurableSet (Ioc a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet
@[simp, measurability]
theorem measurableSet_Ico : MeasurableSet (Ico a b) :=
measurableSet_Ici.inter measurableSet_Iio
theorem nullMeasurableSet_Ico : NullMeasurableSet (Ico a b) μ :=
measurableSet_Ico.nullMeasurableSet
instance nhdsWithin_Ioi_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Ioi b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Ioi.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_Iio_isMeasurablyGenerated : (𝓝[Iio b] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated :=
measurableSet_Iio.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
instance nhdsWithin_uIcc_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (𝓝[[[a, b]]] x) :=
nhdsWithin_Icc_isMeasurablyGenerated
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] : MeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
(isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd).measurableSet
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {f g : δ → α} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } :=
hf.prodMk hg measurableSet_lt'
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ} {f g : δ → α}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : NullMeasurableSet { a | f a < g a } μ :=
(hf.prodMk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_lt'
theorem nullMeasurableSet_lt' [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure (α × α)} :
NullMeasurableSet { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } μ :=
measurableSet_lt'.nullMeasurableSet
theorem nullMeasurableSet_le [SecondCountableTopology α] {μ : Measure δ}
{f g : δ → α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { a | f a ≤ g a } μ :=
(hf.prodMk hg).nullMeasurable measurableSet_le'
theorem Set.OrdConnected.measurableSet (h : OrdConnected s) : MeasurableSet s := by
let u := ⋃ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Ioo x y
have huopen : IsOpen u := isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => isOpen_Ioo
have humeas : MeasurableSet u := huopen.measurableSet
have hfinite : (s \ u).Finite := s.finite_diff_iUnion_Ioo
have : u ⊆ s := iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => iUnion₂_subset fun y hy =>
Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans (h.out hx hy)
rw [← union_diff_cancel this]
exact humeas.union hfinite.measurableSet
theorem IsPreconnected.measurableSet (h : IsPreconnected s) : MeasurableSet s :=
h.ordConnected.measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderClosedTopology α] (s t : Set α) :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ t, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
≤ borel α := by
apply generateFrom_le
borelize α
rintro _ ⟨a, -, b, -, -, rfl⟩
exact measurableSet_Ico
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → y ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
set S : Set (Set α) := { S | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S }
refine le_antisymm ?_ (generateFrom_Ico_mem_le_borel _ _)
letI : MeasurableSpace α := generateFrom S
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Iio]
refine generateFrom_le (forall_mem_range.2 fun a => ?_)
rcases hd.exists_countable_dense_subset_bot_top with ⟨t, hts, hc, htd, htb, -⟩
by_cases ha : ∀ b < a, (Ioo b a).Nonempty
· convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (u ∈ t) (_ : l < u) (_ : u ≤ a), Ico l u)
· ext y
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Iio, mem_Ico]
constructor
· intro hy
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) y with ⟨l, hlt, hly⟩
rcases htd.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioo (ha y hy) with ⟨u, hut, hyu, hua⟩
exact ⟨l, hlt, u, hut, hly.trans_lt hyu, hua.le, hly, hyu⟩
· rintro ⟨l, -, u, -, -, hua, -, hyu⟩
exact hyu.trans_le hua
· refine MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun a ha => MeasurableSet.biUnion hc fun b hb => ?_
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hab => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨a, hts ha, b, hts hb, hab, mem_singleton _⟩
· simp only [not_forall, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at ha
replace ha : a ∈ s := hIoo ha.choose a ha.choose_spec.fst ha.choose_spec.snd
convert_to MeasurableSet (⋃ (l ∈ t) (_ : l < a), Ico l a)
· symm
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, inter_eq_right, subset_def, mem_iUnion,
mem_Ici, mem_Iio]
intro x hx
rcases htd.exists_le' (fun b hb => htb _ hb (hbot b hb)) x with ⟨z, hzt, hzx⟩
exact ⟨z, hzt, hzx.trans_lt hx, hzx⟩
· refine .biUnion hc fun x hx => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hlt => ?_
exact .basic _ ⟨x, hts hx, a, ha, hlt, mem_singleton _⟩
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (by simp) fun _ _ hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ (l u : α), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } := by
simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] {s : Set α} (hd : Dense s)
(hbot : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (hIoo : ∀ x y : α, x < y → Ioo x y = ∅ → x ∈ s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
convert hd.orderDual.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ico_mem_aux hbot fun x y hlt he => hIoo y x hlt _
using 2
· ext s
constructor <;> rintro ⟨l, hl, u, hu, hlt, rfl⟩
exacts [⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, Ico_toDual⟩, ⟨u, hu, l, hl, hlt, Ioc_toDual⟩]
· erw [Ioo_toDual]
exact he
theorem Dense.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
[OrderTopology α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α}
(hd : Dense s) :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ s, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
hd.borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (by simp) fun _ _ hxy H =>
((nonempty_Ioo.2 hxy).ne_empty H).elim
theorem borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α]
[LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] :
borel α = .generateFrom { S : Set α | ∃ l u, l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } := by
| simpa only [exists_prop, mem_univ, true_and] using
(@dense_univ α _).borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioc_mem_aux (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun _ _ _ _ =>
mem_univ _
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Order.lean | 334 | 339 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Ali Ramsey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ali Ramsey, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DFinsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Finiteness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Associator
/-!
# Coalgebras
In this file we define `Coalgebra`, and provide instances for:
* Commutative semirings: `CommSemiring.toCoalgebra`
* Binary products: `Prod.instCoalgebra`
* Finitely supported functions: `DFinsupp.instCoalgebra`, `Finsupp.instCoalgebra`
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalgebra>
-/
suppress_compilation
universe u v w
open scoped TensorProduct
/-- Data fields for `Coalgebra`, to allow API to be constructed before proving `Coalgebra.coassoc`.
See `Coalgebra` for documentation. -/
class CoalgebraStruct (R : Type u) (A : Type v)
[CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] where
/-- The comultiplication of the coalgebra -/
comul : A →ₗ[R] A ⊗[R] A
/-- The counit of the coalgebra -/
counit : A →ₗ[R] R
/--
A representation of an element `a` of a coalgebra `A` is a finite sum of pure tensors `∑ xᵢ ⊗ yᵢ`
that is equal to `comul a`.
-/
structure Coalgebra.Repr (R : Type u) {A : Type v}
[CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [CoalgebraStruct R A] (a : A) where
/-- the indexing type of a representation of `comul a` -/
{ι : Type*}
/-- the finite indexing set of a representation of `comul a` -/
(index : Finset ι)
/-- the first coordinate of a representation of `comul a` -/
(left : ι → A)
/-- the second coordinate of a representation of `comul a` -/
(right : ι → A)
/-- `comul a` is equal to a finite sum of some pure tensors -/
(eq : ∑ i ∈ index, left i ⊗ₜ[R] right i = CoalgebraStruct.comul a)
/-- An arbitrarily chosen representation. -/
def Coalgebra.Repr.arbitrary (R : Type u) {A : Type v}
[CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [CoalgebraStruct R A] (a : A) :
Coalgebra.Repr R a where
left := Prod.fst
right := Prod.snd
| index := TensorProduct.exists_finset (R := R) (CoalgebraStruct.comul a) |>.choose
eq := TensorProduct.exists_finset (R := R) (CoalgebraStruct.comul a) |>.choose_spec.symm
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coalgebra/Basic.lean | 65 | 67 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
| rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 465 | 467 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Peter Pfaffelhuber
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.SetSemiring
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
/-!
# Additive Contents
An additive content `m` on a set of sets `C` is a set function with value 0 at the empty set which
is finitely additive on `C`. That means that for any finset `I` of pairwise disjoint sets in `C`
such that `⋃₀ I ∈ C`, `m (⋃₀ I) = ∑ s ∈ I, m s`.
Mathlib also has a definition of contents over compact sets: see `MeasureTheory.Content`.
A `Content` is in particular an `AddContent` on the set of compact sets.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.AddContent C`: additive contents over the set of sets `C`.
* `MeasureTheory.AddContent.IsSigmaSubadditive`: an `AddContent` is σ-subadditive if
`m (⋃ i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i)` for any sequence of sets `f` in `C` such that `⋃ i, f i ∈ C`.
## Main statements
Let `m` be an `AddContent C`. If `C` is a set semi-ring (`IsSetSemiring C`) we have the properties
* `MeasureTheory.sum_addContent_le_of_subset`: if `I` is a finset of pairwise disjoint sets in `C`
and `⋃₀ I ⊆ t` for `t ∈ C`, then `∑ s ∈ I, m s ≤ m t`.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_mono`: if `s ⊆ t` for two sets in `C`, then `m s ≤ m t`.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_sUnion_le_sum`: an `AddContent C` on a `SetSemiring C` is
sub-additive.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_iUnion_eq_tsum_of_disjoint_of_addContent_iUnion_le`: if an
`AddContent` is σ-subadditive on a semi-ring of sets, then it is σ-additive.
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_union'`: if `s, t ∈ C` are disjoint and `s ∪ t ∈ C`,
then `m (s ∪ t) = m s + m t`.
If `C` is a set ring (`IsSetRing`), then `addContent_union` gives the same conclusion without the
hypothesis `s ∪ t ∈ C` (since it is a consequence of `IsSetRing C`).
If `C` is a set ring (`MeasureTheory.IsSetRing C`), we have
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_union_le`: for `s, t ∈ C`, `m (s ∪ t) ≤ m s + m t`
* `MeasureTheory.addContent_le_diff`: for `s, t ∈ C`, `m s - m t ≤ m (s \ t)`
* `IsSetRing.addContent_of_union`: a function on a ring of sets which is additive on pairs of
disjoint sets defines an additive content
* `addContent_iUnion_eq_sum_of_tendsto_zero`: if an additive content is continuous at `∅`, then
its value on a countable disjoint union is the sum of the values
* `MeasureTheory.isSigmaSubadditive_of_addContent_iUnion_eq_tsum`: if an `AddContent` is
σ-additive on a set ring, then it is σ-subadditive.
-/
open Set Finset Function Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology Function
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {C : Set (Set α)} {s t : Set α} {I : Finset (Set α)}
/-- An additive content is a set function with value 0 at the empty set which is finitely additive
on a given set of sets. -/
structure AddContent (C : Set (Set α)) where
/-- The value of the content on a set. -/
toFun : Set α → ℝ≥0∞
empty' : toFun ∅ = 0
sUnion' (I : Finset (Set α)) (_h_ss : ↑I ⊆ C)
(_h_dis : PairwiseDisjoint (I : Set (Set α)) id) (_h_mem : ⋃₀ ↑I ∈ C) :
toFun (⋃₀ I) = ∑ u ∈ I, toFun u
instance : Inhabited (AddContent C) :=
⟨{toFun := fun _ => 0
empty' := by simp
sUnion' := by simp }⟩
instance : DFunLike (AddContent C) (Set α) (fun _ ↦ ℝ≥0∞) where
coe m s := m.toFun s
coe_injective' m m' _ := by
cases m
cases m'
congr
variable {m m' : AddContent C}
@[ext] protected lemma AddContent.ext (h : ∀ s, m s = m' s) : m = m' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[simp] lemma addContent_empty : m ∅ = 0 := m.empty'
lemma addContent_sUnion (h_ss : ↑I ⊆ C)
(h_dis : PairwiseDisjoint (I : Set (Set α)) id) (h_mem : ⋃₀ ↑I ∈ C) :
m (⋃₀ I) = ∑ u ∈ I, m u :=
m.sUnion' I h_ss h_dis h_mem
lemma addContent_union' (hs : s ∈ C) (ht : t ∈ C) (hst : s ∪ t ∈ C) (h_dis : Disjoint s t) :
m (s ∪ t) = m s + m t := by
by_cases hs_empty : s = ∅
· simp only [hs_empty, Set.empty_union, addContent_empty, zero_add]
classical
have h := addContent_sUnion (m := m) (I := {s, t}) ?_ ?_ ?_
rotate_left
· simp only [coe_pair, Set.insert_subset_iff, hs, ht, Set.singleton_subset_iff, and_self_iff]
· simp only [coe_pair, Set.pairwiseDisjoint_insert, pairwiseDisjoint_singleton,
mem_singleton_iff, Ne, id, forall_eq, true_and]
exact fun _ => h_dis
· simp only [coe_pair, sUnion_insert, sUnion_singleton]
exact hst
convert h
· simp only [coe_pair, sUnion_insert, sUnion_singleton]
· rw [sum_insert, sum_singleton]
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton]
refine fun hs_eq_t => hs_empty ?_
rw [← hs_eq_t] at h_dis
exact Disjoint.eq_bot_of_self h_dis
/-- An additive content is said to be sigma-sub-additive if for any sequence of sets `f` in `C` such
that `⋃ i, f i ∈ C`, we have `m (⋃ i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i)`. -/
def AddContent.IsSigmaSubadditive (m : AddContent C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (_hf : ∀ i, f i ∈ C) (_hf_Union : (⋃ i, f i) ∈ C), m (⋃ i, f i) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i)
section IsSetSemiring
lemma addContent_eq_add_disjointOfDiffUnion_of_subset (hC : IsSetSemiring C)
(hs : s ∈ C) (hI : ↑I ⊆ C) (hI_ss : ∀ t ∈ I, t ⊆ s)
(h_dis : PairwiseDisjoint (I : Set (Set α)) id) :
m s = ∑ i ∈ I, m i + ∑ i ∈ hC.disjointOfDiffUnion hs hI, m i := by
classical
conv_lhs => rw [← hC.sUnion_union_disjointOfDiffUnion_of_subset hs hI hI_ss]
rw [addContent_sUnion]
· rw [sum_union]
exact hC.disjoint_disjointOfDiffUnion hs hI
· rw [coe_union]
exact Set.union_subset hI (hC.disjointOfDiffUnion_subset hs hI)
· rw [coe_union]
exact hC.pairwiseDisjoint_union_disjointOfDiffUnion hs hI h_dis
· rwa [hC.sUnion_union_disjointOfDiffUnion_of_subset hs hI hI_ss]
/-- For an `m : addContent C` on a `SetSemiring C`, if `I` is a `Finset` of pairwise disjoint
sets in `C` and `⋃₀ I ⊆ t` for `t ∈ C`, then `∑ s ∈ I, m s ≤ m t`. -/
lemma sum_addContent_le_of_subset (hC : IsSetSemiring C)
(h_ss : ↑I ⊆ C) (h_dis : PairwiseDisjoint (I : Set (Set α)) id)
(ht : t ∈ C) (hJt : ∀ s ∈ I, s ⊆ t) :
∑ u ∈ I, m u ≤ m t := by
classical
rw [addContent_eq_add_disjointOfDiffUnion_of_subset hC ht h_ss hJt h_dis]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
/-- An `addContent C` on a `SetSemiring C` is monotone. -/
lemma addContent_mono (hC : IsSetSemiring C) (hs : s ∈ C) (ht : t ∈ C)
(hst : s ⊆ t) :
m s ≤ m t := by
have h := sum_addContent_le_of_subset (m := m) hC (I := {s}) ?_ ?_ ht ?_
· simpa only [sum_singleton] using h
· rwa [singleton_subset_set_iff]
· simp only [coe_singleton, pairwiseDisjoint_singleton]
· simp [hst]
/-- For an `m : addContent C` on a `SetSemiring C` and `s t : Set α` with `s ⊆ t`, we can write
`m t = m s + ∑ i in hC.disjointOfDiff ht hs, m i`. -/
theorem eq_add_disjointOfDiff_of_subset (hC : IsSetSemiring C)
(hs : s ∈ C) (ht : t ∈ C) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
m t = m s + ∑ i ∈ hC.disjointOfDiff ht hs, m i := by
classical
conv_lhs => rw [← hC.sUnion_insert_disjointOfDiff ht hs hst]
rw [← coe_insert, addContent_sUnion]
· rw [sum_insert]
exact hC.nmem_disjointOfDiff ht hs
· rw [coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_subset hs (hC.subset_disjointOfDiff ht hs)
| · rw [coe_insert]
exact hC.pairwiseDisjoint_insert_disjointOfDiff ht hs
· rw [coe_insert]
rwa [hC.sUnion_insert_disjointOfDiff ht hs hst]
/-- An `addContent C` on a `SetSemiring C` is sub-additive. -/
lemma addContent_sUnion_le_sum {m : AddContent C} (hC : IsSetSemiring C)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/AddContent.lean | 171 | 177 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
| to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 96 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.GramSchmidtOrtho
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Orientation
/-!
# Orientations of real inner product spaces.
This file provides definitions and proves lemmas about orientations of real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `OrthonormalBasis.adjustToOrientation` takes an orthonormal basis and an orientation, and
returns an orthonormal basis with that orientation: either the original orthonormal basis, or one
constructed by negating a single (arbitrary) basis vector.
* `Orientation.finOrthonormalBasis` is an orthonormal basis, indexed by `Fin n`, with the given
orientation.
* `Orientation.volumeForm` is a nonvanishing top-dimensional alternating form on an oriented real
inner product space, uniquely defined by compatibility with the orientation and inner product
structure.
## Main theorems
* `Orientation.volumeForm_apply_le` states that the result of applying the volume form to a set of
`n` vectors, where `n` is the dimension the inner product space, is bounded by the product of the
lengths of the vectors.
* `Orientation.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal` states that the result of applying the
volume form to a set of `n` orthogonal vectors, where `n` is the dimension the inner product
space, is equal up to sign to the product of the lengths of the vectors.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
open Module
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace OrthonormalBasis
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (e f : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ E)
(x : Orientation ℝ E ι)
/-- The change-of-basis matrix between two orthonormal bases with the same orientation has
determinant 1. -/
theorem det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation
(h : e.toBasis.orientation = f.toBasis.orientation) : e.toBasis.det f = 1 := by
apply (e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_real f).resolve_right
have : 0 < e.toBasis.det f := by
rw [e.toBasis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos] at h
simpa using h
linarith
/-- The change-of-basis matrix between two orthonormal bases with the opposite orientations has
determinant -1. -/
theorem det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_opposite_orientation
(h : e.toBasis.orientation ≠ f.toBasis.orientation) : e.toBasis.det f = -1 := by
contrapose! h
simp [e.toBasis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos,
(e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_real f).resolve_right h]
variable {e f}
/-- Two orthonormal bases with the same orientation determine the same "determinant" top-dimensional
form on `E`, and conversely. -/
theorem same_orientation_iff_det_eq_det :
e.toBasis.det = f.toBasis.det ↔ e.toBasis.orientation = f.toBasis.orientation := by
constructor
· intro h
dsimp [Basis.orientation]
congr
· intro h
rw [e.toBasis.det.eq_smul_basis_det f.toBasis]
simp [e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation f h]
variable (e f)
/-- Two orthonormal bases with opposite orientations determine opposite "determinant"
top-dimensional forms on `E`. -/
theorem det_eq_neg_det_of_opposite_orientation (h : e.toBasis.orientation ≠ f.toBasis.orientation) :
e.toBasis.det = -f.toBasis.det := by
rw [e.toBasis.det.eq_smul_basis_det f.toBasis]
simp [e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_opposite_orientation f h, neg_one_smul]
variable [Nonempty ι]
section AdjustToOrientation
/-- `OrthonormalBasis.adjustToOrientation`, applied to an orthonormal basis, preserves the
property of orthonormality. -/
theorem orthonormal_adjustToOrientation : Orthonormal ℝ (e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x) := by
apply e.orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg
simpa using e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg x
/-- Given an orthonormal basis and an orientation, return an orthonormal basis giving that
orientation: either the original basis, or one constructed by negating a single (arbitrary) basis
vector. -/
def adjustToOrientation : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ E :=
(e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x).toOrthonormalBasis (e.orthonormal_adjustToOrientation x)
theorem toBasis_adjustToOrientation :
(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis = e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x :=
(e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis_toOrthonormalBasis _
/-- `adjustToOrientation` gives an orthonormal basis with the required orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem orientation_adjustToOrientation : (e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.orientation = x := by
rw [e.toBasis_adjustToOrientation]
exact e.toBasis.orientation_adjustToOrientation x
/-- Every basis vector from `adjustToOrientation` is either that from the original basis or its
negation. -/
theorem adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg (i : ι) :
e.adjustToOrientation x i = e i ∨ e.adjustToOrientation x i = -e i := by
simpa [← e.toBasis_adjustToOrientation] using
e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg x i
theorem det_adjustToOrientation :
(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.det = e.toBasis.det ∨
(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.det = -e.toBasis.det := by
simpa using e.toBasis.det_adjustToOrientation x
theorem abs_det_adjustToOrientation (v : ι → E) :
|(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.det v| = |e.toBasis.det v| := by
simp [toBasis_adjustToOrientation]
end AdjustToOrientation
end OrthonormalBasis
namespace Orientation
variable {n : ℕ}
open OrthonormalBasis
/-- An orthonormal basis, indexed by `Fin n`, with the given orientation. -/
protected def finOrthonormalBasis (hn : 0 < n) (h : finrank ℝ E = n) (x : Orientation ℝ E (Fin n)) :
OrthonormalBasis (Fin n) ℝ E := by
haveI := Fin.pos_iff_nonempty.1 hn
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ E := .of_finrank_pos <| h.symm ▸ hn
exact ((@stdOrthonormalBasis _ _ _ _ _ this).reindex <| finCongr h).adjustToOrientation x
/-- `Orientation.finOrthonormalBasis` gives a basis with the required orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem finOrthonormalBasis_orientation (hn : 0 < n) (h : finrank ℝ E = n)
(x : Orientation ℝ E (Fin n)) : (x.finOrthonormalBasis hn h).toBasis.orientation = x := by
haveI := Fin.pos_iff_nonempty.1 hn
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ E := .of_finrank_pos <| h.symm ▸ hn
exact ((@stdOrthonormalBasis _ _ _ _ _ this).reindex <|
finCongr h).orientation_adjustToOrientation x
section VolumeForm
variable [_i : Fact (finrank ℝ E = n)] (o : Orientation ℝ E (Fin n))
/-- The volume form on an oriented real inner product space, a nonvanishing top-dimensional
alternating form uniquely defined by compatibility with the orientation and inner product structure.
-/
irreducible_def volumeForm : E [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := by
classical
cases n with
| zero =>
let opos : E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := .constOfIsEmpty ℝ E (Fin 0) (1 : ℝ)
exact o.eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty.by_cases (fun _ => opos) fun _ => -opos
| succ n => exact (o.finOrthonormalBasis n.succ_pos _i.out).toBasis.det
@[simp]
theorem volumeForm_zero_pos [_i : Fact (finrank ℝ E = 0)] :
Orientation.volumeForm (positiveOrientation : Orientation ℝ E (Fin 0)) =
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty 1 := by
simp [volumeForm, Or.by_cases, if_pos]
theorem volumeForm_zero_neg [_i : Fact (finrank ℝ E = 0)] :
Orientation.volumeForm (-positiveOrientation : Orientation ℝ E (Fin 0)) =
-AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty 1 := by
simp_rw [volumeForm, Or.by_cases, positiveOrientation]
apply if_neg
simp only [neg_rayOfNeZero]
rw [ray_eq_iff, SameRay.sameRay_comm]
intro h
simpa using
congr_arg AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm (eq_zero_of_sameRay_self_neg h)
/-- The volume form on an oriented real inner product space can be evaluated as the determinant with
respect to any orthonormal basis of the space compatible with the orientation. -/
theorem volumeForm_robust (b : OrthonormalBasis (Fin n) ℝ E) (hb : b.toBasis.orientation = o) :
o.volumeForm = b.toBasis.det := by
cases n
· classical
have : o = positiveOrientation := hb.symm.trans b.toBasis.orientation_isEmpty
simp_rw [volumeForm, Or.by_cases, dif_pos this, Nat.rec_zero, Basis.det_isEmpty]
· simp_rw [volumeForm]
rw [same_orientation_iff_det_eq_det, hb]
exact o.finOrthonormalBasis_orientation _ _
/-- The volume form on an oriented real inner product space can be evaluated as the determinant with
respect to any orthonormal basis of the space compatible with the orientation. -/
theorem volumeForm_robust_neg (b : OrthonormalBasis (Fin n) ℝ E) (hb : b.toBasis.orientation ≠ o) :
o.volumeForm = -b.toBasis.det := by
rcases n with - | n
· classical
have : positiveOrientation ≠ o := by rwa [b.toBasis.orientation_isEmpty] at hb
simp_rw [volumeForm, Or.by_cases, dif_neg this.symm, Nat.rec_zero, Basis.det_isEmpty]
let e : OrthonormalBasis (Fin n.succ) ℝ E := o.finOrthonormalBasis n.succ_pos Fact.out
simp_rw [volumeForm]
apply e.det_eq_neg_det_of_opposite_orientation b
convert hb.symm
exact o.finOrthonormalBasis_orientation _ _
@[simp]
theorem volumeForm_neg_orientation : (-o).volumeForm = -o.volumeForm := by
rcases n with - | n
· refine o.eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty.elim ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl
· simp [volumeForm_zero_neg]
· simp [volumeForm_zero_neg]
let e : OrthonormalBasis (Fin n.succ) ℝ E := o.finOrthonormalBasis n.succ_pos Fact.out
have h₁ : e.toBasis.orientation = o := o.finOrthonormalBasis_orientation _ _
have h₂ : e.toBasis.orientation ≠ -o := by
symm
rw [e.toBasis.orientation_ne_iff_eq_neg, h₁]
rw [o.volumeForm_robust e h₁, (-o).volumeForm_robust_neg e h₂]
theorem volumeForm_robust' (b : OrthonormalBasis (Fin n) ℝ E) (v : Fin n → E) :
|o.volumeForm v| = |b.toBasis.det v| := by
cases n
· refine o.eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty.elim ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;> simp
· rw [o.volumeForm_robust (b.adjustToOrientation o) (b.orientation_adjustToOrientation o),
b.abs_det_adjustToOrientation]
| /-- Let `v` be an indexed family of `n` vectors in an oriented `n`-dimensional real inner
product space `E`. The output of the volume form of `E` when evaluated on `v` is bounded in absolute
value by the product of the norms of the vectors `v i`. -/
theorem abs_volumeForm_apply_le (v : Fin n → E) : |o.volumeForm v| ≤ ∏ i : Fin n, ‖v i‖ := by
rcases n with - | n
· refine o.eq_or_eq_neg_of_isEmpty.elim ?_ ?_ <;> rintro rfl <;> simp
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ E := .of_fact_finrank_eq_succ n
have : finrank ℝ E = Fintype.card (Fin n.succ) := by simpa using _i.out
let b : OrthonormalBasis (Fin n.succ) ℝ E := gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis this v
have hb : b.toBasis.det v = ∏ i, ⟪b i, v i⟫ := gramSchmidtOrthonormalBasis_det this v
rw [o.volumeForm_robust' b, hb, Finset.abs_prod]
apply Finset.prod_le_prod
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Orientation.lean | 237 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.IntegralCompProd
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.StandardBorel
/-!
# Lebesgue and Bochner integrals of conditional kernels
Integrals of `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel` and `MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_condKernel`: the integral
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)` is equal to
`∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a)`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.setIntegral_condKernel`:
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ`
Corresponding statements for the Lebesgue integral and/or without the sets `s` and `t` are also
provided.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β Ω : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem (a : α) {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x) (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
simp_rw [Kernel.compProd_apply hs]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : κ a (s ×ˢ t) = (Kernel.fst κ ⊗ₖ Kernel.condKernel κ) a (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (κ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, Kernel.compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s ×ˢ t}
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [Set.preimage, this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ hf]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.setLIntegral_compProd _ _ _ hf hs ht]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a hs MeasurableSet.univ]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a MeasurableSet.univ ht]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Lintegral
section Integral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{E : Type*} {f : β × Ω → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_condKernel (a : α)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (κ a)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x)))
(Kernel.fst κ a) := by
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd hf
lemma integral_condKernel (a : α) (hf : Integrable f (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [integral_compProd hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [setIntegral_compProd hs ht hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ Set.univ) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a hs MeasurableSet.univ hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (a : α) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a MeasurableSet.univ ht hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Integral
end ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {β Ω : Type*} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable {ρ : Measure (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, ρ.condKernel x {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂ρ.fst = ρ s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
simp_rw [compProd_apply hs]
rfl
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ρ.condKernel b t ∂ρ.fst = ρ (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : ρ (s ×ˢ t) = (ρ.fst ⊗ₘ ρ.condKernel) (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (ρ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, ρ.condKernel b (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t)
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ ρ.condKernel b t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
| lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ρ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
rw [lintegral_compProd hf]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Integral.lean | 157 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.ofReal_pos_of_pos⟩ := ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < r := by
rw [← zero_lt_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ofNat(n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = ofNat(n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
theorem ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
theorem ofReal_lt_coe_iff {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < b :=
(ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal ha coe_ne_top).trans <| by rw [coe_toReal]
theorem le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hb
theorem toReal_le_of_le_ofReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b) :
ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top ofReal_ne_top h
(le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha hb).1 h
theorem lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
theorem toReal_lt_of_lt_ofReal {b : ℝ} (h : a < ENNReal.ofReal b) : ENNReal.toReal a < b :=
(lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt h.ne_top).1 h
theorem ofReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_mul, Real.toNNReal_mul hp]
theorem ofReal_mul' {p q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [mul_comm, ofReal_mul hq, mul_comm]
theorem ofReal_pow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (n : ℕ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p ^ n) = ENNReal.ofReal p ^ n := by
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hp, ← coe_pow, ← ofReal_coe_nnreal, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ofReal_nsmul {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal (n • x) = n • ENNReal.ofReal x := by
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_natCast n, ← ofReal_mul n.cast_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : (a * b).toNNReal = a.toNNReal * b.toNNReal :=
WithTop.untopD_zero_mul a b
theorem toNNReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by simp
theorem toNNReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by simp
/-- `ENNReal.toNNReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toNNRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := ENNReal.toNNReal
map_one' := toNNReal_coe _
map_mul' _ _ := toNNReal_mul
map_zero' := toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toNNReal = a.toNNReal ^ n :=
toNNRealHom.map_pow a n
/-- `ENNReal.toReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ :=
(NNReal.toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ).comp toNNRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toReal_mul : (a * b).toReal = a.toReal * b.toReal :=
toRealHom.map_mul a b
theorem toReal_nsmul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (n • a).toReal = n • a.toReal := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toReal = a.toReal ^ n :=
toRealHom.map_pow a n
theorem toReal_ofReal_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ENNReal.toReal (ENNReal.ofReal c * a) = c * ENNReal.toReal a := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h]
theorem toReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by
rw [toReal_mul, toReal_top, mul_zero]
theorem toReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact toReal_mul_top _
theorem toReal_eq_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal = b.toReal ↔ a = b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simp only [coe_inj, NNReal.coe_inj, coe_toReal]
protected theorem trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal := by
simpa only [or_iff_not_imp_left] using toReal_pos
protected theorem trichotomy₂ {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 ∨
p = 0 ∧ q = ∞ ∨
p = 0 ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∨
p = ∞ ∧ q = ∞ ∨
0 < p.toReal ∧ q = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∧ p.toReal ≤ q.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (bot_le : 0 ≤ p) with ((rfl : 0 = p) | (hp : 0 < p))
· simpa using q.trichotomy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_top : q ≤ ∞) with (rfl | hq)
· simpa using p.trichotomy
repeat' right
have hq' : 0 < q := lt_of_lt_of_le hp hpq
have hp' : p < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt hpq hq
simp [ENNReal.toReal_mono hq.ne hpq, ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff, hp, hp', hq', hq]
protected theorem dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal :=
haveI : p = ⊤ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
simpa using ENNReal.trichotomy₂ (Fact.out : 1 ≤ p)
this.imp_right fun h => h.2
theorem toReal_pos_iff_ne_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : 0 < p.toReal ↔ p ≠ ∞ :=
⟨fun h hp =>
have : (0 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := toReal_top ▸ (hp ▸ h.ne : 0 ≠ ∞.toReal)
this rfl,
fun h => zero_lt_one.trans_le (p.dichotomy.resolve_left h)⟩
end Real
section iInf
variable {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toNNReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toNNReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, toNNReal_top, NNReal.iInf_empty]
· lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [← coe_iInf, toNNReal_coe]
theorem toNNReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toNNReal = sInf (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sInf_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iInf hf)
theorem toNNReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toNNReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [toNNReal_coe]
by_cases h : BddAbove (range f)
· rw [← coe_iSup h, toNNReal_coe]
· rw [NNReal.iSup_of_not_bddAbove h, iSup_coe_eq_top.2 h, toNNReal_top]
theorem toNNReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toNNReal = sSup (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sSup_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iSup hf)
theorem toReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iInf hf, NNReal.coe_iInf]
theorem toReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toReal = sInf (ENNReal.toReal '' s) := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_sInf s hf, NNReal.coe_sInf, Set.image_image]
theorem toReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iSup hf, NNReal.coe_iSup]
theorem toReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toReal = sSup (ENNReal.toReal '' s) := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_sSup s hf, NNReal.coe_sSup, Set.image_image]
@[simp] lemma ofReal_iInf [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ | h := em (∃ i, f i ≤ 0)
· rw [(iInf_eq_bot _).2 fun _ _ ↦ ⟨i, by simpa [ofReal_of_nonpos hi]⟩]
simp [Real.iInf_nonpos' ⟨i, hi⟩]
replace h i : 0 ≤ f i := le_of_not_le fun hi ↦ h ⟨i, hi⟩
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a ↦ ?_
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ∞
· simp
rw [le_iInf_iff, le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha, le_ciInf_iff ⟨0, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds]⟩]
· exact forall_congr' fun i ↦ (le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha (h _)).symm
· exact Real.iInf_nonneg h
theorem iInf_add : iInf f + a = ⨅ i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => add_le_add (iInf_le _ _) <| le_rfl)
(tsub_le_iff_right.1 <| le_iInf fun _ => tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| iInf_le _ _)
theorem iSup_sub : (⨆ i, f i) - a = ⨆ i, f i - a :=
le_antisymm (tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| iSup_le fun i => tsub_le_iff_right.1 <| le_iSup (f · - a) i)
(iSup_le fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (le_iSup _ _) (le_refl a))
theorem sub_iInf : (a - ⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a - f i := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [tsub_le_iff_right, add_comm, iInf_add]
simp [tsub_le_iff_right, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
theorem sInf_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} : sInf s + a = ⨅ b ∈ s, b + a := by simp [sInf_eq_iInf, iInf_add]
theorem add_iInf {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a + iInf f = ⨅ b, a + f b := by
rw [add_comm, iInf_add]; simp [add_comm]
theorem iInf_add_iInf (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f k + g k ≤ f i + g j) : iInf f + iInf g = ⨅ a, f a + g a :=
suffices ⨅ a, f a + g a ≤ iInf f + iInf g from
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => add_le_add (iInf_le _ _) (iInf_le _ _)) this
calc
⨅ a, f a + g a ≤ ⨅ (a) (a'), f a + g a' :=
le_iInf₂ fun a a' => let ⟨k, h⟩ := h a a'; iInf_le_of_le k h
_ = iInf f + iInf g := by simp_rw [iInf_add, add_iInf]
end iInf
theorem sup_eq_zero {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ⊔ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
sup_eq_bot_iff
end ENNReal
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `ENNReal.ofReal`. -/
@[positivity ENNReal.ofReal _]
def evalENNRealOfReal : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ≥0∞), ~q(ENNReal.ofReal $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(Iff.mpr (@ENNReal.ofReal_pos $a) $pa))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ENNReal.ofReal"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 578 | 579 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.LinearOrder
import Mathlib.Order.Notation
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.Inhabit
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
/-!
# Basic definitions about `≤` and `<`
This file proves basic results about orders, provides extensive dot notation, defines useful order
classes and allows to transfer order instances.
## Type synonyms
* `OrderDual α` : A type synonym reversing the meaning of all inequalities, with notation `αᵒᵈ`.
* `AsLinearOrder α`: A type synonym to promote `PartialOrder α` to `LinearOrder α` using
`IsTotal α (≤)`.
### Transferring orders
- `Order.Preimage`, `Preorder.lift`: Transfers a (pre)order on `β` to an order on `α`
using a function `f : α → β`.
- `PartialOrder.lift`, `LinearOrder.lift`: Transfers a partial (resp., linear) order on `β` to a
partial (resp., linear) order on `α` using an injective function `f`.
### Extra class
* `DenselyOrdered`: An order with no gap, i.e. for any two elements `a < b` there exists `c` such
that `a < c < b`.
## Notes
`≤` and `<` are highly favored over `≥` and `>` in mathlib. The reason is that we can formulate all
lemmas using `≤`/`<`, and `rw` has trouble unifying `≤` and `≥`. Hence choosing one direction spares
us useless duplication. This is enforced by a linter. See Note [nolint_ge] for more infos.
Dot notation is particularly useful on `≤` (`LE.le`) and `<` (`LT.lt`). To that end, we
provide many aliases to dot notation-less lemmas. For example, `le_trans` is aliased with
`LE.le.trans` and can be used to construct `hab.trans hbc : a ≤ c` when `hab : a ≤ b`,
`hbc : b ≤ c`, `lt_of_le_of_lt` is aliased as `LE.le.trans_lt` and can be used to construct
`hab.trans hbc : a < c` when `hab : a ≤ b`, `hbc : b < c`.
## TODO
- expand module docs
- automatic construction of dual definitions / theorems
## Tags
preorder, order, partial order, poset, linear order, chain
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-! ### Bare relations -/
attribute [ext] LE
protected lemma LE.le.ge [LE α] {x y : α} (h : x ≤ y) : y ≥ x := h
protected lemma GE.ge.le [LE α] {x y : α} (h : x ≥ y) : y ≤ x := h
protected lemma LT.lt.gt [LT α] {x y : α} (h : x < y) : y > x := h
protected lemma GT.gt.lt [LT α] {x y : α} (h : x > y) : y < x := h
/-- Given a relation `R` on `β` and a function `f : α → β`, the preimage relation on `α` is defined
by `x ≤ y ↔ f x ≤ f y`. It is the unique relation on `α` making `f` a `RelEmbedding` (assuming `f`
is injective). -/
@[simp]
def Order.Preimage (f : α → β) (s : β → β → Prop) (x y : α) : Prop := s (f x) (f y)
@[inherit_doc] infixl:80 " ⁻¹'o " => Order.Preimage
/-- The preimage of a decidable order is decidable. -/
instance Order.Preimage.decidable (f : α → β) (s : β → β → Prop) [H : DecidableRel s] :
DecidableRel (f ⁻¹'o s) := fun _ _ ↦ H _ _
/-! ### Preorders -/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a b c d : α}
theorem le_trans' : b ≤ c → a ≤ b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_trans
theorem lt_trans' : b < c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_trans
theorem lt_of_le_of_lt' : b ≤ c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem lt_of_lt_of_le' : b < c → a ≤ b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem le_of_le_of_eq' : b ≤ c → a = b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_of_eq_of_le
theorem le_of_eq_of_le' : b = c → a ≤ b → a ≤ c :=
flip le_of_le_of_eq
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq' : b < c → a = b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_eq_of_lt
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt' : b = c → a < b → a < c :=
flip lt_of_lt_of_eq
theorem not_lt_iff_not_le_or_ge : ¬a < b ↔ ¬a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, Classical.not_and_iff_not_or_not, Classical.not_not]
-- Unnecessary brackets are here for readability
lemma not_lt_iff_le_imp_le : ¬ a < b ↔ (a ≤ b → b ≤ a) := by
simp [not_lt_iff_not_le_or_ge, or_iff_not_imp_left]
/-- If `x = y` then `y ≤ x`. Note: this lemma uses `y ≤ x` instead of `x ≥ y`, because `le` is used
almost exclusively in mathlib. -/
lemma ge_of_eq (h : a = b) : b ≤ a := le_of_eq h.symm
@[simp] lemma lt_self_iff_false (x : α) : x < x ↔ False := ⟨lt_irrefl x, False.elim⟩
alias LE.le.trans := le_trans
alias LE.le.trans' := le_trans'
alias LT.lt.trans := lt_trans
alias LT.lt.trans' := lt_trans'
alias LE.le.trans_lt := lt_of_le_of_lt
alias LE.le.trans_lt' := lt_of_le_of_lt'
alias LT.lt.trans_le := lt_of_lt_of_le
alias LT.lt.trans_le' := lt_of_lt_of_le'
alias LE.le.trans_eq := le_of_le_of_eq
alias LE.le.trans_eq' := le_of_le_of_eq'
alias LT.lt.trans_eq := lt_of_lt_of_eq
alias LT.lt.trans_eq' := lt_of_lt_of_eq'
alias Eq.trans_le := le_of_eq_of_le
alias Eq.trans_ge := le_of_eq_of_le'
alias Eq.trans_lt := lt_of_eq_of_lt
alias Eq.trans_gt := lt_of_eq_of_lt'
alias LE.le.lt_of_not_le := lt_of_le_not_le
alias LE.le.lt_or_eq_dec := Decidable.lt_or_eq_of_le
alias LT.lt.le := le_of_lt
alias LT.lt.ne := ne_of_lt
alias Eq.le := le_of_eq
@[inherit_doc ge_of_eq] alias Eq.ge := ge_of_eq
alias LT.lt.asymm := lt_asymm
alias LT.lt.not_lt := lt_asymm
theorem ne_of_not_le (h : ¬a ≤ b) : a ≠ b := fun hab ↦ h (le_of_eq hab)
protected lemma Eq.not_lt (hab : a = b) : ¬a < b := fun h' ↦ h'.ne hab
protected lemma Eq.not_gt (hab : a = b) : ¬b < a := hab.symm.not_lt
@[simp] lemma le_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : a ≤ b := (Subsingleton.elim a b).le
-- Making this a @[simp] lemma causes confluence problems downstream.
lemma not_lt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : ¬a < b := (Subsingleton.elim a b).not_lt
namespace LT.lt
protected theorem false : a < a → False := lt_irrefl a
theorem ne' (h : a < b) : b ≠ a := h.ne.symm
end LT.lt
theorem le_of_forall_le (H : ∀ c, c ≤ a → c ≤ b) : a ≤ b := H _ le_rfl
theorem le_of_forall_ge (H : ∀ c, a ≤ c → b ≤ c) : b ≤ a := H _ le_rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias le_of_forall_le' := le_of_forall_ge
theorem forall_le_iff_le : (∀ ⦃c⦄, c ≤ a → c ≤ b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_forall_le, fun h _ hca ↦ le_trans hca h⟩
theorem forall_le_iff_ge : (∀ ⦃c⦄, a ≤ c → b ≤ c) ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_forall_ge, fun h _ hca ↦ le_trans h hca⟩
/-- monotonicity of `≤` with respect to `→` -/
theorem le_implies_le_of_le_of_le (hca : c ≤ a) (hbd : b ≤ d) : a ≤ b → c ≤ d :=
fun hab ↦ (hca.trans hab).trans hbd
end Preorder
/-! ### Partial order -/
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem ge_antisymm : a ≤ b → b ≤ a → b = a :=
flip le_antisymm
theorem lt_of_le_of_ne' : a ≤ b → b ≠ a → a < b := fun h₁ h₂ ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne h₁ h₂.symm
theorem Ne.lt_of_le : a ≠ b → a ≤ b → a < b :=
flip lt_of_le_of_ne
theorem Ne.lt_of_le' : b ≠ a → a ≤ b → a < b :=
flip lt_of_le_of_ne'
alias LE.le.antisymm := le_antisymm
alias LE.le.antisymm' := ge_antisymm
alias LE.le.lt_of_ne := lt_of_le_of_ne
alias LE.le.lt_of_ne' := lt_of_le_of_ne'
alias LE.le.lt_or_eq := lt_or_eq_of_le
-- Unnecessary brackets are here for readability
lemma le_imp_eq_iff_le_imp_le : (a ≤ b → b = a) ↔ (a ≤ b → b ≤ a) where
mp h hab := (h hab).le
mpr h hab := (h hab).antisymm hab
-- Unnecessary brackets are here for readability
lemma ge_imp_eq_iff_le_imp_le : (a ≤ b → a = b) ↔ (a ≤ b → b ≤ a) where
mp h hab := (h hab).ge
mpr h hab := hab.antisymm (h hab)
namespace LE.le
theorem lt_iff_ne (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ↔ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne, h.lt_of_ne⟩
theorem gt_iff_ne (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ↔ b ≠ a :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.ne.symm, h.lt_of_ne'⟩
theorem not_lt_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a < b ↔ a = b :=
h.lt_iff_ne.not_left
theorem not_gt_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a < b ↔ b = a :=
h.gt_iff_ne.not_left
theorem le_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.antisymm h, Eq.le⟩
theorem ge_iff_eq (h : a ≤ b) : b ≤ a ↔ a = b :=
⟨h.antisymm, Eq.ge⟩
end LE.le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt [DecidableLE α] : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b :=
Decidable.le_iff_lt_or_eq.trans or_comm
theorem le_iff_eq_or_lt : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ a < b := le_iff_lt_or_eq.trans or_comm
theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne : a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨le_of_lt h, ne_of_lt h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ h1.lt_of_ne h2⟩
lemma eq_iff_not_lt_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) : a = b ↔ ¬ a < b := by simp [hab, lt_iff_le_and_ne]
alias LE.le.eq_iff_not_lt := eq_iff_not_lt_of_le
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt [DecidableLE α] : a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬a < b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, h ▸ lt_irrefl _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦
h₁.antisymm <| Decidable.byContradiction fun h₃ ↦ h₂ (h₁.lt_of_not_le h₃)⟩
theorem eq_iff_le_not_lt : a = b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ¬a < b :=
haveI := Classical.dec
Decidable.eq_iff_le_not_lt
theorem eq_or_lt_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a = b ∨ a < b := h.lt_or_eq.symm
theorem eq_or_gt_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : b = a ∨ a < b := h.lt_or_eq.symm.imp Eq.symm id
theorem gt_or_eq_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : a < b ∨ b = a := (eq_or_gt_of_le h).symm
alias LE.le.eq_or_lt_dec := Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_lt := eq_or_lt_of_le
alias LE.le.eq_or_gt := eq_or_gt_of_le
alias LE.le.gt_or_eq := gt_or_eq_of_le
theorem eq_of_le_of_not_lt (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : ¬a < b) : a = b := hab.eq_or_lt.resolve_right hba
theorem eq_of_ge_of_not_gt (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : ¬a < b) : b = a := (eq_of_le_of_not_lt hab hba).symm
alias LE.le.eq_of_not_lt := eq_of_le_of_not_lt
alias LE.le.eq_of_not_gt := eq_of_ge_of_not_gt
theorem Ne.le_iff_lt (h : a ≠ b) : a ≤ b ↔ a < b := ⟨fun h' ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne h' h, fun h ↦ h.le⟩
theorem Ne.not_le_or_not_le (h : a ≠ b) : ¬a ≤ b ∨ ¬b ≤ a := not_and_or.1 <| le_antisymm_iff.not.1 h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le [DecidableEq α] : (a ≠ b ↔ a < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ Decidable.byCases le_of_eq (le_of_lt ∘ h.mp), fun h ↦ ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne h, ne_of_lt⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ne_iff_lt_iff_le : (a ≠ b ↔ a < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
haveI := Classical.dec
Decidable.ne_iff_lt_iff_le
lemma eq_of_forall_le_iff (H : ∀ c, c ≤ a ↔ c ≤ b) : a = b :=
((H _).1 le_rfl).antisymm ((H _).2 le_rfl)
lemma eq_of_forall_ge_iff (H : ∀ c, a ≤ c ↔ b ≤ c) : a = b :=
((H _).2 le_rfl).antisymm ((H _).1 le_rfl)
/-- To prove commutativity of a binary operation `○`, we only to check `a ○ b ≤ b ○ a` for all `a`,
`b`. -/
lemma commutative_of_le {f : β → β → α} (comm : ∀ a b, f a b ≤ f b a) : ∀ a b, f a b = f b a :=
fun _ _ ↦ (comm _ _).antisymm <| comm _ _
/-- To prove associativity of a commutative binary operation `○`, we only to check
`(a ○ b) ○ c ≤ a ○ (b ○ c)` for all `a`, `b`, `c`. -/
lemma associative_of_commutative_of_le {f : α → α → α} (comm : Std.Commutative f)
(assoc : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c ≤ f a (f b c)) : Std.Associative f where
assoc a b c :=
le_antisymm (assoc _ _ _) <| by
rw [comm.comm, comm.comm b, comm.comm _ c, comm.comm a]
exact assoc ..
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b : α}
namespace LE.le
lemma lt_or_le (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a < c ∨ c ≤ b := (lt_or_ge a c).imp id h.trans'
lemma le_or_lt (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a ≤ c ∨ c < b := (le_or_gt a c).imp id h.trans_lt'
lemma le_or_le (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b := (h.lt_or_le c).imp le_of_lt id
end LE.le
namespace LT.lt
lemma lt_or_lt (h : a < b) (c : α) : a < c ∨ c < b := (le_or_gt b c).imp h.trans_le id
end LT.lt
-- Variant of `min_def` with the branches reversed.
theorem min_def' (a b : α) : min a b = if b ≤ a then b else a := by
rw [min_def]
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (lt | eq | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt.le, if_neg (not_le.mpr lt)]
· rw [if_pos eq.le, if_pos eq.ge, eq]
· rw [if_neg (not_le.mpr gt.gt), if_pos gt.le]
-- Variant of `min_def` with the branches reversed.
-- This is sometimes useful as it used to be the default.
theorem max_def' (a b : α) : max a b = if b ≤ a then a else b := by
rw [max_def]
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (lt | eq | gt)
· rw [if_pos lt.le, if_neg (not_le.mpr lt)]
· rw [if_pos eq.le, if_pos eq.ge, eq]
· rw [if_neg (not_le.mpr gt.gt), if_pos gt.le]
theorem lt_of_not_le (h : ¬b ≤ a) : a < b :=
((le_total _ _).resolve_right h).lt_of_not_le h
theorem lt_iff_not_le : a < b ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
⟨not_le_of_lt, lt_of_not_le⟩
theorem Ne.lt_or_lt (h : a ≠ b) : a < b ∨ b < a :=
lt_or_gt_of_ne h
/-- A version of `ne_iff_lt_or_gt` with LHS and RHS reversed. -/
@[simp]
theorem lt_or_lt_iff_ne : a < b ∨ b < a ↔ a ≠ b :=
ne_iff_lt_or_gt.symm
theorem not_lt_iff_eq_or_lt : ¬a < b ↔ a = b ∨ b < a :=
not_lt.trans <| Decidable.le_iff_eq_or_lt.trans <| or_congr eq_comm Iff.rfl
theorem exists_ge_of_linear (a b : α) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
match le_total a b with
| Or.inl h => ⟨_, h, le_rfl⟩
| Or.inr h => ⟨_, le_rfl, h⟩
lemma exists_forall_ge_and {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, p j) → (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, q j) → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, p j ∧ q j
| ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨c, hac, hbc⟩ := exists_ge_of_linear a b
⟨c, fun _d hcd ↦ ⟨ha _ <| hac.trans hcd, hb _ <| hbc.trans hcd⟩⟩
theorem le_of_forall_lt (H : ∀ c, c < a → c < b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (H _ h)
theorem forall_lt_iff_le : (∀ ⦃c⦄, c < a → c < b) ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt, fun h _ hca ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hca h⟩
theorem le_of_forall_lt' (H : ∀ c, a < c → b < c) : b ≤ a :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl _ (H _ h)
theorem forall_lt_iff_le' : (∀ ⦃c⦄, a < c → b < c) ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_of_forall_lt', fun h _ hac ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt h hac⟩
theorem eq_of_forall_lt_iff (h : ∀ c, c < a ↔ c < b) : a = b :=
(le_of_forall_lt fun _ ↦ (h _).1).antisymm <| le_of_forall_lt fun _ ↦ (h _).2
theorem eq_of_forall_gt_iff (h : ∀ c, a < c ↔ b < c) : a = b :=
(le_of_forall_lt' fun _ ↦ (h _).2).antisymm <| le_of_forall_lt' fun _ ↦ (h _).1
section ltByCases
variable {P : Sort*} {x y : α}
@[simp]
lemma ltByCases_lt (h : x < y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = h₁ h := dif_pos h
@[simp]
lemma ltByCases_gt (h : y < x) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = h₃ h := (dif_neg h.not_lt).trans (dif_pos h)
@[simp]
lemma ltByCases_eq (h : x = y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = h₂ h := (dif_neg h.not_lt).trans (dif_neg h.not_gt)
lemma ltByCases_not_lt (h : ¬ x < y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : ¬ y < x → x = y := fun h' => (le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt h') (le_of_not_gt h))) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = if h' : y < x then h₃ h' else h₂ (p h') := dif_neg h
lemma ltByCases_not_gt (h : ¬ y < x) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : ¬ x < y → x = y := fun h' => (le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt h) (le_of_not_gt h'))) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = if h' : x < y then h₁ h' else h₂ (p h') :=
dite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => dif_neg h)
lemma ltByCases_ne (h : x ≠ y) {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : ¬ x < y → y < x := fun h' => h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h') :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = if h' : x < y then h₁ h' else h₃ (p h') :=
dite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => dif_pos _)
lemma ltByCases_comm {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
(p : y = x → x = y := fun h' => h'.symm) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = ltByCases y x h₃ (h₂ ∘ p) h₁ := by
refine ltByCases x y (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· rw [ltByCases_lt h, ltByCases_gt h]
· rw [ltByCases_eq h, ltByCases_eq h.symm, comp_apply]
· rw [ltByCases_lt h, ltByCases_gt h]
lemma eq_iff_eq_of_lt_iff_lt_of_gt_iff_gt {x' y' : α}
(ltc : (x < y) ↔ (x' < y')) (gtc : (y < x) ↔ (y' < x')) :
x = y ↔ x' = y' := by simp_rw [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ← not_lt, ltc, gtc]
lemma ltByCases_rec {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} (p : P)
(hlt : (h : x < y) → h₁ h = p) (heq : (h : x = y) → h₂ h = p)
(hgt : (h : y < x) → h₃ h = p) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = p :=
ltByCases x y
(fun h => ltByCases_lt h ▸ hlt h)
(fun h => ltByCases_eq h ▸ heq h)
(fun h => ltByCases_gt h ▸ hgt h)
lemma ltByCases_eq_iff {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P} {p : P} :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = p ↔ (∃ h, h₁ h = p) ∨ (∃ h, h₂ h = p) ∨ (∃ h, h₃ h = p) := by
refine ltByCases x y (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· simp only [ltByCases_lt, exists_prop_of_true, h, h.not_lt, not_false_eq_true,
exists_prop_of_false, or_false, h.ne]
· simp only [h, lt_self_iff_false, ltByCases_eq, not_false_eq_true,
exists_prop_of_false, exists_prop_of_true, or_false, false_or]
· simp only [ltByCases_gt, exists_prop_of_true, h, h.not_lt, not_false_eq_true,
exists_prop_of_false, false_or, h.ne']
lemma ltByCases_congr {x' y' : α} {h₁ : x < y → P} {h₂ : x = y → P} {h₃ : y < x → P}
{h₁' : x' < y' → P} {h₂' : x' = y' → P} {h₃' : y' < x' → P} (ltc : (x < y) ↔ (x' < y'))
(gtc : (y < x) ↔ (y' < x')) (hh'₁ : ∀ (h : x' < y'), h₁ (ltc.mpr h) = h₁' h)
(hh'₂ : ∀ (h : x' = y'), h₂ ((eq_iff_eq_of_lt_iff_lt_of_gt_iff_gt ltc gtc).mpr h) = h₂' h)
(hh'₃ : ∀ (h : y' < x'), h₃ (gtc.mpr h) = h₃' h) :
ltByCases x y h₁ h₂ h₃ = ltByCases x' y' h₁' h₂' h₃' := by
refine ltByCases_rec _ (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· rw [ltByCases_lt (ltc.mp h), hh'₁]
· rw [eq_iff_eq_of_lt_iff_lt_of_gt_iff_gt ltc gtc] at h
rw [ltByCases_eq h, hh'₂]
· rw [ltByCases_gt (gtc.mp h), hh'₃]
/-- Perform a case-split on the ordering of `x` and `y` in a decidable linear order,
non-dependently. -/
abbrev ltTrichotomy (x y : α) (p q r : P) := ltByCases x y (fun _ => p) (fun _ => q) (fun _ => r)
variable {p q r s : P}
@[simp]
lemma ltTrichotomy_lt (h : x < y) : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = p := ltByCases_lt h
@[simp]
lemma ltTrichotomy_gt (h : y < x) : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = r := ltByCases_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ltTrichotomy_eq (h : x = y) : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = q := ltByCases_eq h
lemma ltTrichotomy_not_lt (h : ¬ x < y) :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = if y < x then r else q := ltByCases_not_lt h
lemma ltTrichotomy_not_gt (h : ¬ y < x) :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = if x < y then p else q := ltByCases_not_gt h
lemma ltTrichotomy_ne (h : x ≠ y) :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = if x < y then p else r := ltByCases_ne h
lemma ltTrichotomy_comm : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = ltTrichotomy y x r q p := ltByCases_comm
lemma ltTrichotomy_self {p : P} : ltTrichotomy x y p p p = p :=
ltByCases_rec p (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
lemma ltTrichotomy_eq_iff : ltTrichotomy x y p q r = s ↔
(x < y ∧ p = s) ∨ (x = y ∧ q = s) ∨ (y < x ∧ r = s) := by
refine ltByCases x y (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_) (fun h => ?_)
· simp only [ltTrichotomy_lt, false_and, true_and, or_false, h, h.not_lt, h.ne]
· simp only [ltTrichotomy_eq, false_and, true_and, or_false, false_or, h, lt_irrefl]
· simp only [ltTrichotomy_gt, false_and, true_and, false_or, h, h.not_lt, h.ne']
lemma ltTrichotomy_congr {x' y' : α} {p' q' r' : P} (ltc : (x < y) ↔ (x' < y'))
(gtc : (y < x) ↔ (y' < x')) (hh'₁ : x' < y' → p = p')
(hh'₂ : x' = y' → q = q') (hh'₃ : y' < x' → r = r') :
ltTrichotomy x y p q r = ltTrichotomy x' y' p' q' r' :=
ltByCases_congr ltc gtc hh'₁ hh'₂ hh'₃
end ltByCases
/-! #### `min`/`max` recursors -/
section MinMaxRec
variable {p : α → Prop}
lemma min_rec (ha : a ≤ b → p a) (hb : b ≤ a → p b) : p (min a b) := by
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b <;> simp [min_eq_left, min_eq_right, *]
lemma max_rec (ha : b ≤ a → p a) (hb : a ≤ b → p b) : p (max a b) := by
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b <;> simp [max_eq_left, max_eq_right, *]
lemma min_rec' (p : α → Prop) (ha : p a) (hb : p b) : p (min a b) :=
min_rec (fun _ ↦ ha) fun _ ↦ hb
lemma max_rec' (p : α → Prop) (ha : p a) (hb : p b) : p (max a b) :=
max_rec (fun _ ↦ ha) fun _ ↦ hb
lemma min_def_lt (a b : α) : min a b = if a < b then a else b := by
rw [min_comm, min_def, ← ite_not]; simp only [not_le]
lemma max_def_lt (a b : α) : max a b = if a < b then b else a := by
rw [max_comm, max_def, ← ite_not]; simp only [not_le]
end MinMaxRec
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Implications -/
lemma lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le {β} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b → c ≤ d) (h : d < c) : b < a :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' ↦ (H h').not_lt h
lemma le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β} :
a ≤ b → c ≤ d ↔ d < c → b < a :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le, le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt⟩
lemma lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' {β} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) (H' : b ≤ a ↔ d ≤ c) : b < a ↔ d < c :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| (and_congr H' (not_congr H)).trans lt_iff_le_not_le.symm
lemma lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β}
(H : a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) : b < a ↔ d < c := not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr H).trans <| not_le
lemma le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt {β} [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {a b : α} {c d : β} :
(a ≤ b ↔ c ≤ d) ↔ (b < a ↔ d < c) :=
⟨lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le, fun H ↦ not_lt.symm.trans <| (not_congr H).trans <| not_lt⟩
/-- A symmetric relation implies two values are equal, when it implies they're less-equal. -/
lemma rel_imp_eq_of_rel_imp_le [PartialOrder β] (r : α → α → Prop) [IsSymm α r] {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → f a ≤ f b) {a b : α} : r a b → f a = f b := fun hab ↦
le_antisymm (h a b hab) (h b a <| symm hab)
/-! ### Extensionality lemmas -/
@[ext]
lemma Preorder.toLE_injective : Function.Injective (@Preorder.toLE α) :=
fun
| { lt := A_lt, lt_iff_le_not_le := A_iff, .. },
{ lt := B_lt, lt_iff_le_not_le := B_iff, .. } => by
rintro ⟨⟩
have : A_lt = B_lt := by
funext a b
rw [A_iff, B_iff]
cases this
congr
@[ext]
lemma PartialOrder.toPreorder_injective : Function.Injective (@PartialOrder.toPreorder α) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; congr
@[ext]
lemma LinearOrder.toPartialOrder_injective : Function.Injective (@LinearOrder.toPartialOrder α) :=
fun
| { le := A_le, lt := A_lt,
toDecidableLE := A_decidableLE, toDecidableEq := A_decidableEq, toDecidableLT := A_decidableLT
min := A_min, max := A_max, min_def := A_min_def, max_def := A_max_def,
compare := A_compare, compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := A_compare_canonical, .. },
{ le := B_le, lt := B_lt,
toDecidableLE := B_decidableLE, toDecidableEq := B_decidableEq, toDecidableLT := B_decidableLT
min := B_min, max := B_max, min_def := B_min_def, max_def := B_max_def,
compare := B_compare, compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := B_compare_canonical, .. } => by
rintro ⟨⟩
obtain rfl : A_decidableLE = B_decidableLE := Subsingleton.elim _ _
obtain rfl : A_decidableEq = B_decidableEq := Subsingleton.elim _ _
obtain rfl : A_decidableLT = B_decidableLT := Subsingleton.elim _ _
have : A_min = B_min := by
funext a b
exact (A_min_def _ _).trans (B_min_def _ _).symm
cases this
have : A_max = B_max := by
funext a b
exact (A_max_def _ _).trans (B_max_def _ _).symm
cases this
have : A_compare = B_compare := by
funext a b
exact (A_compare_canonical _ _).trans (B_compare_canonical _ _).symm
congr
lemma Preorder.ext {A B : Preorder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) : A = B := by
ext x y; exact H x y
lemma PartialOrder.ext {A B : PartialOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by ext x y; exact H x y
lemma PartialOrder.ext_lt {A B : PartialOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x < y) ↔ x < y) :
A = B := by ext x y; rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, @le_iff_lt_or_eq _ A, H]
lemma LinearOrder.ext {A B : LinearOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y) :
A = B := by ext x y; exact H x y
lemma LinearOrder.ext_lt {A B : LinearOrder α} (H : ∀ x y : α, (haveI := A; x < y) ↔ x < y) :
A = B := LinearOrder.toPartialOrder_injective (PartialOrder.ext_lt H)
/-! ### Order dual -/
/-- Type synonym to equip a type with the dual order: `≤` means `≥` and `<` means `>`. `αᵒᵈ` is
notation for `OrderDual α`. -/
def OrderDual (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
α
@[inherit_doc]
notation:max α "ᵒᵈ" => OrderDual α
namespace OrderDual
instance (α : Type*) [h : Nonempty α] : Nonempty αᵒᵈ :=
h
instance (α : Type*) [h : Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton αᵒᵈ :=
h
instance (α : Type*) [LE α] : LE αᵒᵈ :=
⟨fun x y : α ↦ y ≤ x⟩
instance (α : Type*) [LT α] : LT αᵒᵈ :=
⟨fun x y : α ↦ y < x⟩
instance instOrd (α : Type*) [Ord α] : Ord αᵒᵈ where
compare := fun (a b : α) ↦ compare b a
instance instSup (α : Type*) [Min α] : Max αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊓ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
instance instInf (α : Type*) [Max α] : Min αᵒᵈ :=
⟨((· ⊔ ·) : α → α → α)⟩
instance instPreorder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : Preorder αᵒᵈ where
le_refl := fun _ ↦ le_refl _
le_trans := fun _ _ _ hab hbc ↦ hbc.trans hab
lt_iff_le_not_le := fun _ _ ↦ lt_iff_le_not_le
instance instPartialOrder (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] : PartialOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Preorder αᵒᵈ)
le_antisymm := fun a b hab hba ↦ @le_antisymm α _ a b hba hab
instance instLinearOrder (α : Type*) [LinearOrder α] : LinearOrder αᵒᵈ where
__ := inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder αᵒᵈ)
__ := inferInstanceAs (Ord αᵒᵈ)
le_total := fun a b : α ↦ le_total b a
max := fun a b ↦ (min a b : α)
min := fun a b ↦ (max a b : α)
min_def := fun a b ↦ show (max .. : α) = _ by rw [max_comm, max_def]; rfl
max_def := fun a b ↦ show (min .. : α) = _ by rw [min_comm, min_def]; rfl
toDecidableLE := (inferInstance : DecidableRel (fun a b : α ↦ b ≤ a))
toDecidableLT := (inferInstance : DecidableRel (fun a b : α ↦ b < a))
toDecidableEq := (inferInstance : DecidableEq α)
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b := by
simp only [compare, LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq, compareOfLessAndEq, eq_comm]
rfl
/-- The opposite linear order to a given linear order -/
def _root_.LinearOrder.swap (α : Type*) (_ : LinearOrder α) : LinearOrder α :=
inferInstanceAs <| LinearOrder (OrderDual α)
instance : ∀ [Inhabited α], Inhabited αᵒᵈ := fun [x : Inhabited α] => x
theorem Ord.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : Ord α] : OrderDual.instOrd αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
theorem Preorder.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : Preorder α] : OrderDual.instPreorder αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
theorem instPartialOrder.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : PartialOrder α] :
OrderDual.instPartialOrder αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
theorem instLinearOrder.dual_dual (α : Type*) [H : LinearOrder α] :
OrderDual.instLinearOrder αᵒᵈ = H :=
rfl
end OrderDual
/-! ### `HasCompl` -/
instance Prop.hasCompl : HasCompl Prop :=
⟨Not⟩
instance Pi.hasCompl [∀ i, HasCompl (π i)] : HasCompl (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun x i ↦ (x i)ᶜ⟩
theorem Pi.compl_def [∀ i, HasCompl (π i)] (x : ∀ i, π i) :
xᶜ = fun i ↦ (x i)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Pi.compl_apply [∀ i, HasCompl (π i)] (x : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) :
xᶜ i = (x i)ᶜ :=
rfl
instance IsIrrefl.compl (r) [IsIrrefl α r] : IsRefl α rᶜ :=
⟨@irrefl α r _⟩
instance IsRefl.compl (r) [IsRefl α r] : IsIrrefl α rᶜ :=
⟨fun a ↦ not_not_intro (refl a)⟩
theorem compl_lt [LinearOrder α] : (· < · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· ≥ ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
theorem compl_le [LinearOrder α] : (· ≤ · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· > ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
theorem compl_gt [LinearOrder α] : (· > · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· ≤ ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
theorem compl_ge [LinearOrder α] : (· ≥ · : α → α → _)ᶜ = (· < ·) := by ext; simp [compl]
instance Ne.instIsEquiv_compl : IsEquiv α (· ≠ ·)ᶜ := by
convert eq_isEquiv α
simp [compl]
/-! ### Order instances on the function space -/
instance Pi.hasLe [∀ i, LE (π i)] :
LE (∀ i, π i) where le x y := ∀ i, x i ≤ y i
theorem Pi.le_def [∀ i, LE (π i)] {x y : ∀ i, π i} :
x ≤ y ↔ ∀ i, x i ≤ y i :=
Iff.rfl
instance Pi.preorder [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] : Preorder (∀ i, π i) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (LE (∀ i, π i))
le_refl := fun a i ↦ le_refl (a i)
le_trans := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ i ↦ le_trans (h₁ i) (h₂ i)
theorem Pi.lt_def [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x y : ∀ i, π i} :
x < y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ ∃ i, x i < y i := by
simp +contextual [lt_iff_le_not_le, Pi.le_def]
instance Pi.partialOrder [∀ i, PartialOrder (π i)] : PartialOrder (∀ i, π i) where
__ := Pi.preorder
le_antisymm := fun _ _ h1 h2 ↦ funext fun b ↦ (h1 b).antisymm (h2 b)
namespace Sum
variable {α₁ α₂ : Type*} [LE β]
@[simp]
lemma elim_le_elim_iff {u₁ v₁ : α₁ → β} {u₂ v₂ : α₂ → β} :
Sum.elim u₁ u₂ ≤ Sum.elim v₁ v₂ ↔ u₁ ≤ v₁ ∧ u₂ ≤ v₂ :=
Sum.forall
lemma const_le_elim_iff {b : β} {v₁ : α₁ → β} {v₂ : α₂ → β} :
Function.const _ b ≤ Sum.elim v₁ v₂ ↔ Function.const _ b ≤ v₁ ∧ Function.const _ b ≤ v₂ :=
elim_const_const b ▸ elim_le_elim_iff ..
lemma elim_le_const_iff {b : β} {u₁ : α₁ → β} {u₂ : α₂ → β} :
Sum.elim u₁ u₂ ≤ Function.const _ b ↔ u₁ ≤ Function.const _ b ∧ u₂ ≤ Function.const _ b :=
elim_const_const b ▸ elim_le_elim_iff ..
end Sum
section Pi
/-- A function `a` is strongly less than a function `b` if `a i < b i` for all `i`. -/
def StrongLT [∀ i, LT (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : Prop :=
∀ i, a i < b i
@[inherit_doc]
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => StrongLT
variable [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {a b c : ∀ i, π i}
theorem le_of_strongLT (h : a ≺ b) : a ≤ b := fun _ ↦ (h _).le
theorem lt_of_strongLT [Nonempty ι] (h : a ≺ b) : a < b := by
inhabit ι
exact Pi.lt_def.2 ⟨le_of_strongLT h, default, h _⟩
theorem strongLT_of_strongLT_of_le (hab : a ≺ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ≺ c := fun _ ↦
(hab _).trans_le <| hbc _
theorem strongLT_of_le_of_strongLT (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≺ c) : a ≺ c := fun _ ↦
(hab _).trans_lt <| hbc _
alias StrongLT.le := le_of_strongLT
alias StrongLT.lt := lt_of_strongLT
alias StrongLT.trans_le := strongLT_of_strongLT_of_le
alias LE.le.trans_strongLT := strongLT_of_le_of_strongLT
end Pi
section Function
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x y : ∀ i, π i} {i : ι} {a b : π i}
theorem le_update_iff : x ≤ Function.update y i a ↔ x i ≤ a ∧ ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), x j ≤ y j :=
Function.forall_update_iff _ fun j z ↦ x j ≤ z
theorem update_le_iff : Function.update x i a ≤ y ↔ a ≤ y i ∧ ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), x j ≤ y j :=
Function.forall_update_iff _ fun j z ↦ z ≤ y j
theorem update_le_update_iff :
Function.update x i a ≤ Function.update y i b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ∀ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), x j ≤ y j := by
simp +contextual [update_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem update_le_update_iff' : update x i a ≤ update x i b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [update_le_update_iff]
@[simp]
theorem update_lt_update_iff : update x i a < update x i b ↔ a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' update_le_update_iff' update_le_update_iff'
@[simp]
theorem le_update_self_iff : x ≤ update x i a ↔ x i ≤ a := by simp [le_update_iff]
@[simp]
theorem update_le_self_iff : update x i a ≤ x ↔ a ≤ x i := by simp [update_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lt_update_self_iff : x < update x i a ↔ x i < a := by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]
@[simp]
theorem update_lt_self_iff : update x i a < x ↔ a < x i := by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]
end Function
instance Pi.sdiff [∀ i, SDiff (π i)] : SDiff (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun x y i ↦ x i \ y i⟩
theorem Pi.sdiff_def [∀ i, SDiff (π i)] (x y : ∀ i, π i) :
x \ y = fun i ↦ x i \ y i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Pi.sdiff_apply [∀ i, SDiff (π i)] (x y : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) :
(x \ y) i = x i \ y i :=
rfl
namespace Function
variable [Preorder α] [Nonempty β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem const_le_const : const β a ≤ const β b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [Pi.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem const_lt_const : const β a < const β b ↔ a < b := by simpa [Pi.lt_def] using le_of_lt
end Function
/-! ### Lifts of order instances -/
/-- Transfer a `Preorder` on `β` to a `Preorder` on `α` using a function `f : α → β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev Preorder.lift [Preorder β] (f : α → β) : Preorder α where
le x y := f x ≤ f y
le_refl _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ := _root_.le_trans
lt x y := f x < f y
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := _root_.lt_iff_le_not_le
/-- Transfer a `PartialOrder` on `β` to a `PartialOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PartialOrder.lift [PartialOrder β] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f) : PartialOrder α :=
{ Preorder.lift f with le_antisymm := fun _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ inj (h₁.antisymm h₂) }
theorem compare_of_injective_eq_compareOfLessAndEq (a b : α) [LinearOrder β]
[DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f)
[Decidable (LT.lt (self := PartialOrder.lift f inj |>.toLT) a b)] :
compare (f a) (f b) =
@compareOfLessAndEq _ a b (PartialOrder.lift f inj |>.toLT) _ _ := by
have h := LinearOrder.compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq (f a) (f b)
simp only [h, compareOfLessAndEq]
split_ifs <;> try (first | rfl | contradiction)
· have : ¬ f a = f b := by rename_i h; exact inj.ne h
contradiction
· have : f a = f b := by rename_i h; exact congrArg f h
contradiction
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version takes `[Max α]` and `[Min α]` as arguments, then uses
them for `max` and `min` fields. See `LinearOrder.lift'` for a version that autogenerates `min` and
`max` fields, and `LinearOrder.liftWithOrd` for one that does not auto-generate `compare`
fields. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.lift [LinearOrder β] [Max α] [Min α] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f)
(hsup : ∀ x y, f (x ⊔ y) = max (f x) (f y)) (hinf : ∀ x y, f (x ⊓ y) = min (f x) (f y)) :
LinearOrder α :=
letI instOrdα : Ord α := ⟨fun a b ↦ compare (f a) (f b)⟩
letI decidableLE := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x ≤ f y))
letI decidableLT := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x < f y))
letI decidableEq := fun x y ↦ decidable_of_iff (f x = f y) inj.eq_iff
{ PartialOrder.lift f inj, instOrdα with
le_total := fun x y ↦ le_total (f x) (f y)
toDecidableLE := decidableLE
toDecidableLT := decidableLT
toDecidableEq := decidableEq
min := (· ⊓ ·)
max := (· ⊔ ·)
min_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hinf _ _).trans (min_def _ _)
max_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hsup _ _).trans (max_def _ _)
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := fun a b ↦
compare_of_injective_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b f inj }
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version autogenerates `min` and `max` fields. See `LinearOrder.lift`
for a version that takes `[Max α]` and `[Min α]`, then uses them as `max` and `min`. See
`LinearOrder.liftWithOrd'` for a version which does not auto-generate `compare` fields.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.lift' [LinearOrder β] (f : α → β) (inj : Injective f) : LinearOrder α :=
@LinearOrder.lift α β _ ⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then y else x⟩
⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then x else y⟩ f inj
(fun _ _ ↦ (apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (max_def _ _).symm) fun _ _ ↦
(apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (min_def _ _).symm
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version takes `[Max α]` and `[Min α]` as arguments, then uses
them for `max` and `min` fields. It also takes `[Ord α]` as an argument and uses them for `compare`
fields. See `LinearOrder.lift` for a version that autogenerates `compare` fields, and
`LinearOrder.liftWithOrd'` for one that auto-generates `min` and `max` fields.
fields. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.liftWithOrd [LinearOrder β] [Max α] [Min α] [Ord α] (f : α → β)
(inj : Injective f) (hsup : ∀ x y, f (x ⊔ y) = max (f x) (f y))
(hinf : ∀ x y, f (x ⊓ y) = min (f x) (f y))
(compare_f : ∀ a b : α, compare a b = compare (f a) (f b)) : LinearOrder α :=
letI decidableLE := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x ≤ f y))
letI decidableLT := fun x y ↦ (inferInstance : Decidable (f x < f y))
letI decidableEq := fun x y ↦ decidable_of_iff (f x = f y) inj.eq_iff
{ PartialOrder.lift f inj with
le_total := fun x y ↦ le_total (f x) (f y)
toDecidableLE := decidableLE
toDecidableLT := decidableLT
toDecidableEq := decidableEq
min := (· ⊓ ·)
max := (· ⊔ ·)
min_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hinf _ _).trans (min_def _ _)
max_def := by
intros x y
apply inj
rw [apply_ite f]
exact (hsup _ _).trans (max_def _ _)
compare_eq_compareOfLessAndEq := fun a b ↦
(compare_f a b).trans <| compare_of_injective_eq_compareOfLessAndEq a b f inj }
/-- Transfer a `LinearOrder` on `β` to a `LinearOrder` on `α` using an injective
function `f : α → β`. This version auto-generates `min` and `max` fields. It also takes `[Ord α]`
as an argument and uses them for `compare` fields. See `LinearOrder.lift` for a version that
autogenerates `compare` fields, and `LinearOrder.liftWithOrd` for one that doesn't auto-generate
`min` and `max` fields. fields. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.liftWithOrd' [LinearOrder β] [Ord α] (f : α → β)
(inj : Injective f)
(compare_f : ∀ a b : α, compare a b = compare (f a) (f b)) : LinearOrder α :=
@LinearOrder.liftWithOrd α β _ ⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then y else x⟩
⟨fun x y ↦ if f x ≤ f y then x else y⟩ _ f inj
(fun _ _ ↦ (apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (max_def _ _).symm)
(fun _ _ ↦ (apply_ite f _ _ _).trans (min_def _ _).symm)
compare_f
/-! ### Subtype of an order -/
namespace Subtype
instance le [LE α] {p : α → Prop} : LE (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (x : α) ≤ y⟩
instance lt [LT α] {p : α → Prop} : LT (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun x y ↦ (x : α) < y⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk [LE α] {p : α → Prop} {x y : α} {hx : p x} {hy : p y} :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : Subtype p) ≤ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt_mk [LT α] {p : α → Prop} {x y : α} {hx : p x} {hy : p y} :
(⟨x, hx⟩ : Subtype p) < ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x < y :=
Iff.rfl
| @[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Order/Basic.lean | 1,013 | 1,013 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
/-!
# Range of linear maps
The range `LinearMap.range` of a (semi)linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
More specifically, `LinearMap.range` applies to any `SemilinearMapClass` over a `RingHomSurjective`
ring homomorphism.
Note that this also means that dot notation (i.e. `f.range` for a linear map `f`) does not work.
## Notations
* We continue to use the notations `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` and `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of semilinear
(resp. linear) maps from `M` to `M₂` over the ring homomorphism `σ` (resp. over the ring `R`).
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module, range
-/
open Function
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The range of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is a submodule of `M₂`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
theorem range_coe [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : (range f : Set M₂) = Set.range f :=
rfl
theorem range_toAddSubmonoid [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
(range f).toAddSubmonoid = AddMonoidHom.mrange f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem range_eq_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : range f = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
theorem mem_range_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (x : M) : f x ∈ range f :=
⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_id : range (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.range_id
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃]
(f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = map g (range f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) ≤ range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
theorem range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} :
range f = ⊤ ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, Set.range_eq_univ]
theorem range_eq_top_of_surjective [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (hf : Surjective f) :
range f = ⊤ := range_eq_top.2 hf
theorem range_le_iff_comap [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
theorem map_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset_range f p)
@[simp]
theorem range_neg {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : LinearMap.range (-f) = LinearMap.range f := by
change range ((-LinearMap.id : M₂ →ₗ[R₂] M₂).comp f) = _
rw [range_comp, Submodule.map_neg, Submodule.map_id]
@[simp] lemma range_domRestrict [Module R M₂] (K : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) :
range (domRestrict f K) = K.map f := by ext; simp
lemma range_domRestrict_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (S : Submodule R M) :
LinearMap.range (f.domRestrict S) ≤ LinearMap.range f := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, rfl⟩
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self f y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_range {M M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M]
[AddCommGroup M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
LinearMap.range f.toIntLinearMap = AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule f.range := rfl
lemma _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_le [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : p ≤ LinearMap.range f) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset h
lemma range_restrictScalars [SMul R R₂] [Module R₂ M] [Module R M₂] [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R R₂]
[IsScalarTower R R₂ M₂] (f : M →ₗ[R₂] M₂) :
LinearMap.range (f.restrictScalars R) = (LinearMap.range f).restrictScalars R := rfl
end
/-- The decreasing sequence of submodules consisting of the ranges of the iterates of a linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def iterateRange (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ℕ →o (Submodule R M)ᵒᵈ where
toFun n := LinearMap.range (f ^ n)
monotone' n m w x h := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le w
rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at h
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := h
rw [LinearMap.mem_range]
use (f ^ c) m
rw [pow_add, Module.End.mul_apply]
/-- Restrict the codomain of a linear map `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] LinearMap.range f :=
f.codRestrict (LinearMap.range f) (LinearMap.mem_range_self f)
/-- The range of a linear map is finite if the domain is finite.
Note: this instance can form a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` in the
presence of `Fintype M₂`. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype M] [DecidableEq M₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
theorem range_codRestrict {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomSurjective τ₂₁] (p : Submodule R M)
(f : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) (hf) :
range (codRestrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype (LinearMap.range f) := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using map_codRestrict _ _ _ _
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) = range f ⊓ q :=
le_antisymm (le_inf map_le_range (map_comap_le _ _)) <| by
rintro _ ⟨⟨x, _, rfl⟩, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : q ≤ range f) : map f (comap f q) = q := by rwa [Submodule.map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
@[simp]
theorem range_zero [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] : range (0 : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) = ⊥ := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_zero _
section
variable [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂]
theorem range_le_bot_iff (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : range f ≤ ⊥ ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [range_le_iff_comap]; exact ker_eq_top
theorem range_eq_bot {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} : range f = ⊥ ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [← range_le_bot_iff, le_bot_iff]
theorem range_le_ker_iff {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} {g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃} :
range f ≤ ker g ↔ (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ker_eq_top.1 <| eq_top_iff'.2 fun _ => h <| ⟨_, rfl⟩, fun h x hx =>
mem_ker.2 <| Exists.elim hx fun y hy => by rw [← hy, ← comp_apply, h, zero_apply]⟩
theorem comap_le_comap_iff {f : F} (hf : range f = ⊤) {p p'} : comap f p ≤ comap f p' ↔ p ≤ p' :=
⟨fun H ↦ by rwa [SetLike.le_def, (range_eq_top.1 hf).forall], comap_mono⟩
theorem comap_injective {f : F} (hf : range f = ⊤) : Injective (comap f) := fun _ _ h =>
le_antisymm ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (le_of_eq h)) ((comap_le_comap_iff hf).1 (ge_of_eq h))
-- TODO (?): generalize to semilinear maps with `f ∘ₗ g` bijective.
theorem ker_eq_range_of_comp_eq_id {M P} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[AddCommGroup P] [Module R P] {f : M →ₗ[R] P} {g : P →ₗ[R] M} (h : f ∘ₗ g = .id) :
ker f = range (LinearMap.id - g ∘ₗ f) :=
le_antisymm (fun x hx ↦ ⟨x, show x - g (f x) = x by rw [hx, map_zero, sub_zero]⟩) <|
range_le_ker_iff.mpr <| by rw [comp_sub, comp_id, ← comp_assoc, h, id_comp, sub_self]
end
end AddCommMonoid
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring R₂]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
variable {f : F}
open Submodule
theorem range_toAddSubgroup [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
(range f).toAddSubgroup = f.toAddMonoidHom.range :=
rfl
theorem ker_le_iff [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {p : Submodule R M} :
ker f ≤ p ↔ ∃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} ⊆ p := by
constructor
· intro h
use 0
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, range_coe]
exact ⟨⟨0, map_zero f⟩, h⟩
· rintro ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩
rw [SetLike.le_def]
intro z hz
simp only [mem_ker, SetLike.mem_coe] at hz
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, range_coe, Set.mem_range] at h₁
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h₁
have hx' : x ∈ p := h₂ hx
have hxz : z + x ∈ p := by
apply h₂
simp [hx, hz]
suffices z + x - x ∈ p by simpa only [this, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact p.sub_mem hxz hx'
end Ring
section Semifield
variable [Semifield K]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
theorem range_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : range (a • f) = range f := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_smul f _ a h
theorem range_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) :
range (a • f) = ⨆ _ : a ≠ 0, range f := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using Submodule.map_smul' f _ a
end Semifield
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable (p : Submodule R M)
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
open LinearMap
@[simp]
theorem map_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : map f ⊤ = range f :=
(range_eq_map f).symm
@[simp]
theorem range_subtype : range p.subtype = p := by simpa using map_comap_subtype p ⊤
theorem map_subtype_le (p' : Submodule R p) : map p.subtype p' ≤ p := by
simpa using (map_le_range : map p.subtype p' ≤ range p.subtype)
/-- Under the canonical linear map from a submodule `p` to the ambient space `M`, the image of the
maximal submodule of `p` is just `p`. -/
theorem map_subtype_top : map p.subtype (⊤ : Submodule R p) = p := by simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_subtype_eq_top {p p' : Submodule R M} : comap p.subtype p' = ⊤ ↔ p ≤ p' :=
eq_top_iff.trans <| map_le_iff_le_comap.symm.trans <| by rw [map_subtype_top]
@[simp]
theorem comap_subtype_self : comap p.subtype p = ⊤ :=
comap_subtype_eq_top.2 le_rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_subtype_le_iff {p q r : Submodule R M} :
q.comap p.subtype ≤ r.comap p.subtype ↔ p ⊓ q ≤ p ⊓ r :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using map_mono (f := p.subtype) h,
fun h ↦ by simpa using comap_mono (f := p.subtype) h⟩
theorem range_inclusion (p q : Submodule R M) (h : p ≤ q) :
range (inclusion h) = comap q.subtype p := by
| rw [← map_top, inclusion, LinearMap.map_codRestrict, map_top, range_subtype]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Range.lean | 304 | 304 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.HasOuterApproxClosed
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
/-!
# Finite measures
This file defines the type of finite measures on a given measurable space. When the underlying
space has a topology and the measurable space structure (sigma algebra) is finer than the Borel
sigma algebra, then the type of finite measures is equipped with the topology of weak convergence
of measures. The topology of weak convergence is the coarsest topology w.r.t. which
for every bounded continuous `ℝ≥0`-valued function `f`, the integration of `f` against the
measure is continuous.
## Main definitions
The main definitions are
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`: The type of finite measures on `Ω` with the topology of weak
convergence of measures.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → (WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`:
Interpret a finite measure as a continuous linear functional on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω`. This is used for the definition of the
topology of weak convergence.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.map`: The push-forward `f* μ` of a finite measure `μ` on `Ω`
along a measurable function `f : Ω → Ω'`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mapCLM`: The push-forward along a given continuous `f : Ω → Ω'`
as a continuous linear map `f* : FiniteMeasure Ω →L[ℝ≥0] FiniteMeasure Ω'`.
## Main results
* Finite measures `μ` on `Ω` give rise to continuous linear functionals on the space of
bounded continuous nonnegative functions on `Ω` via integration:
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toWeakDualBCNN : FiniteMeasure Ω → (WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0))`
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_integral_tendsto`: Convergence of finite
measures is characterized by the convergence of integrals of all bounded continuous functions.
This shows that the chosen definition of topology coincides with the common textbook definition
of weak convergence of measures. A similar characterization by the convergence of integrals (in
the `MeasureTheory.lintegral` sense) of all bounded continuous nonnegative functions is
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto`.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.continuous_map`: For a continuous function `f : Ω → Ω'`, the
push-forward of finite measures `f* : FiniteMeasure Ω → FiniteMeasure Ω'` is continuous.
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.t2Space`: The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures
is Hausdorff on spaces where indicators of closed sets have continuous decreasing approximating
sequences (in particular on any pseudo-metrizable spaces).
## Implementation notes
The topology of weak convergence of finite Borel measures is defined using a mapping from
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` to `WeakDual ℝ≥0 (Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0)`, inheriting the topology from the
latter.
The implementation of `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` and is directly as a subtype of
`MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`, and the coercion to a function is the composition `ENNReal.toNNReal`
and the coercion to function of `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. Another alternative would have been to
use a bijection with `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure Ω ℝ≥0` as an intermediate step. Some
considerations:
* Potential advantages of using the `NNReal`-valued vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would avoid need to compose with `ENNReal.toNNReal`, the
`NNReal`-valued API could be more directly available.
* Potential drawbacks of the vector measure alternative:
* The coercion to function would lose monotonicity, as non-measurable sets would be defined to
have measure 0.
* No integration theory directly. E.g., the topology definition requires
`MeasureTheory.lintegral` w.r.t. a coercion to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω` in any case.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, finite measure
-/
noncomputable section
open BoundedContinuousFunction Filter MeasureTheory Set Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace FiniteMeasure
section FiniteMeasure
/-! ### Finite measures
In this section we define the `Type` of `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω`, when `Ω` is a measurable
space. Finite measures on `Ω` are a module over `ℝ≥0`.
If `Ω` is moreover a topological space and the sigma algebra on `Ω` is finer than the Borel sigma
algebra (i.e. `[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]`), then `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` is equipped with
the topology of weak convergence of measures. This is implemented by defining a pairing of finite
measures `μ` on `Ω` with continuous bounded nonnegative functions `f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0` via integration,
and using the associated weak topology (essentially the weak-star topology on the dual of
`Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0`).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- Finite measures are defined as the subtype of measures that have the property of being finite
measures (i.e., their total mass is finite). -/
def _root_.MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsFiniteMeasure μ }
/-- Coercion from `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure Ω` to `MeasureTheory.Measure Ω`. -/
@[coe]
def toMeasure : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
/-- A finite measure can be interpreted as a measure. -/
instance instCoe : Coe (FiniteMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) := { coe := toMeasure }
instance isFiniteMeasure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) := μ.prop
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) := rfl
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (FiniteMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective <| Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_lt_top (↑ν) s).ne
@[simp]
theorem null_iff_toMeasure_null (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
ν s = 0 ↔ (ν : Measure Ω) s = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure, h, ENNReal.coe_zero],
fun h ↦ congrArg ENNReal.toNNReal h⟩
theorem apply_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : Set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ :=
ENNReal.toNNReal_mono (measure_ne_top _ s₂) ((μ : Measure Ω).mono h)
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
protected lemma tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {f : ι → Set Ω} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
simpa [← ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure]
using tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate (μ := μ.toMeasure) (ι := ι)
/-- The (total) mass of a finite measure `μ` is `μ univ`, i.e., the cast to `NNReal` of
`(μ : measure Ω) univ`. -/
def mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ℝ≥0 := μ univ
@[simp] theorem apply_le_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) : μ s ≤ μ.mass := by
simpa using apply_mono μ (subset_univ s)
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_mass {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} : (μ.mass : ℝ≥0∞) = (μ : Measure Ω) univ :=
ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure μ Set.univ
instance instZero : Zero (FiniteMeasure Ω) where zero := ⟨0, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : FiniteMeasure Ω) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_mass : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).mass = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mass_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun μ_mass => ?_, fun hμ => by simp only [hμ, zero_mass]⟩
apply toMeasure_injective
apply Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.mp
rwa [← ennreal_mass, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
theorem mass_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff μ
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → (μ : Measure Ω) s = (ν : Measure Ω) s) : μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
ext1 s s_mble
exact h s s_mble
theorem eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
ext1 s s_mble
simpa [ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble)
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (FiniteMeasure Ω) := ⟨0⟩
instance instAdd : Add (FiniteMeasure Ω) where add μ ν := ⟨μ + ν, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd⟩
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul : SMul R (FiniteMeasure Ω) where
smul (c : R) μ := ⟨c • (μ : Measure Ω), MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_zero : ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) 0 = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(μ + ν) = (↑μ + ↑ν : Measure Ω) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_smul (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(c • μ) = c • (μ : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : (⇑(μ + ν) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (⇑μ + ⇑ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_inj, ne_eq, ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
ENNReal.coe_add]
norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(⇑(c • μ) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = c • (⇑μ : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext; simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ENNReal.coe_smul]
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
toMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid _ toMeasure_zero toMeasure_add fun _ _ ↦ toMeasure_smul _ _
/-- Coercion is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def toMeasureAddMonoidHom : FiniteMeasure Ω →+ Measure Ω where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := toMeasure_zero
map_add' := toMeasure_add
instance {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Module ℝ≥0 (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
Function.Injective.module _ toMeasureAddMonoidHom toMeasure_injective toMeasure_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s := by
rw [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
/-- Restrict a finite measure μ to a set A. -/
def restrict (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω where
val := (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A
property := MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure Ω) A
theorem restrict_measure_eq (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) = (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A := rfl
theorem restrict_apply_measure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω}
(s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) s = (μ : Measure Ω) (s ∩ A) :=
Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
theorem restrict_apply (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω} (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict A) s = μ (s ∩ A) := by
apply congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal
exact Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
theorem restrict_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : (μ.restrict A).mass = μ A := by
simp only [mass, restrict_apply μ A MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
theorem restrict_eq_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A = 0 ↔ μ A = 0 := by
rw [← mass_zero_iff, restrict_mass]
theorem restrict_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A ≠ 0 ↔ μ A ≠ 0 := by
rw [← mass_nonzero_iff, restrict_mass]
/-- The type of finite measures is a measurable space when equipped with the Giry monad. -/
instance : MeasurableSpace (FiniteMeasure Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace
/-- The set of all finite measures is a measurable set in the Giry monad. -/
lemma measurableSet_isFiniteMeasure : MeasurableSet { μ : Measure Ω | IsFiniteMeasure μ } := by
suffices { μ : Measure Ω | IsFiniteMeasure μ } = (fun μ => μ univ) ⁻¹' (Set.Ico 0 ∞) by
rw [this]
exact Measure.measurable_coe MeasurableSet.univ measurableSet_Ico
ext μ
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_iUnion, mem_preimage, mem_Ico, zero_le, true_and, exists_const]
exact isFiniteMeasure_iff μ
/-- The monoidal product is a measurabule function from the product of finite measures over
`α` and `β` into the type of finite measures over `α × β`. -/
theorem measurable_prod {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
Measurable (fun (μ : FiniteMeasure α × FiniteMeasure β)
↦ μ.1.toMeasure.prod μ.2.toMeasure) := by
have Heval {u v} (Hu : MeasurableSet u) (Hv : MeasurableSet v):
Measurable fun a : (FiniteMeasure α × FiniteMeasure β) ↦
a.1.toMeasure u * a.2.toMeasure v :=
Measurable.mul
((Measure.measurable_coe Hu).comp (measurable_subtype_coe.comp measurable_fst))
((Measure.measurable_coe Hv).comp (measurable_subtype_coe.comp measurable_snd))
apply Measurable.measure_of_isPiSystem generateFrom_prod.symm isPiSystem_prod _
· simp_rw [← Set.univ_prod_univ, Measure.prod_prod, Heval MeasurableSet.univ MeasurableSet.univ]
simp only [mem_image2, mem_setOf_eq, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intros _ _ Hu _ Hv Heq
simp_rw [← Heq, Measure.prod_prod, Heval Hu Hv]
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω]
/-- Two finite Borel measures are equal if the integrals of all non-negative bounded continuous
functions with respect to both agree. -/
theorem ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
{μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : ∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ν) :
μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
change (μ : Measure Ω) = (ν : Measure Ω)
exact ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq_of_IsFiniteMeasure h
/-- Two finite Borel measures are equal if the integrals of all bounded continuous functions with
respect to both agree. -/
theorem ext_of_forall_integral_eq [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
{μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : ∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ), ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂ν) :
μ = ν := by
apply ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq
intro f
apply (ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal_iff' (lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal μ f).ne
(lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal ν f).ne).mp
rw [toReal_lintegral_coe_eq_integral f μ, toReal_lintegral_coe_eq_integral f ν]
exact h ⟨⟨fun x => (f x).toReal, Continuous.comp' NNReal.continuous_coe f.continuous⟩,
f.map_bounded'⟩
/-- The pairing of a finite (Borel) measure `μ` with a nonnegative bounded continuous
function is obtained by (Lebesgue) integrating the (test) function against the measure.
This is `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN`. -/
def testAgainstNN (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0 :=
(∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω)).toNNReal
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_coe_eq {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} :
(μ.testAgainstNN f : ℝ≥0∞) = ∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω) :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _).ne
theorem testAgainstNN_const (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (c : ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (BoundedContinuousFunction.const Ω c) = c * μ.mass := by
simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj]
theorem testAgainstNN_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} (f_le_g : (f : Ω → ℝ≥0) ≤ g) :
μ.testAgainstNN f ≤ μ.testAgainstNN g := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
gcongr
apply f_le_g
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_zero (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using μ.testAgainstNN_const 0
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_one (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 1 = μ.mass := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, coe_one, Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.coe_one, lintegral_one]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_testAgainstNN_apply (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN f = 0 := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_zero, lintegral_zero_measure, ENNReal.toNNReal_zero]
theorem zero_testAgainstNN : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN = 0 := by
funext
simp only [zero_testAgainstNN_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem smul_testAgainstNN_apply (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
(c • μ).testAgainstNN f = c • μ.testAgainstNN f := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.smul_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def,
lintegral_smul_measure]
section weak_convergence
variable [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem testAgainstNN_add (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f₁ f₂ : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (f₁ + f₂) = μ.testAgainstNN f₁ + μ.testAgainstNN f₂ := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
exact lintegral_add_left (BoundedContinuousFunction.measurable_coe_ennreal_comp _) _
| theorem testAgainstNN_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] [PseudoMetricSpace R] [Zero R]
[IsBoundedSMul R ℝ≥0] (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (c : R) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (c • f) = c • μ.testAgainstNN f := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, BoundedContinuousFunction.coe_smul, testAgainstNN_coe_eq,
ENNReal.coe_smul]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/FiniteMeasure.lean | 389 | 393 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
rcases s.finite_or_infinite with hs | hs
· by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem h hs]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self h]
apply Nat.pred_le
convert Nat.zero_le _
rw [hs.ncard]
theorem ncard_exchange {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| encard_exchange ha hb
theorem ncard_exchange' {a b : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
(insert a s \ {b}).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_exchange ha hb, ← singleton_union, ← singleton_union, union_diff_distrib,
@diff_singleton_eq_self _ b {a} fun h ↦ ha (by rwa [← mem_singleton_iff.mp h])]
lemma odd_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Odd (insert a s).ncard ↔ Even s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.odd_add]
simp only [Nat.odd_add, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, Nat.not_even_one, iff_false, Decidable.not_not]
lemma even_card_insert_iff {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Even (insert a s).ncard ↔ Odd s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem ha hs, Nat.even_add_one, Nat.not_even_iff_odd]
end InsertErase
variable {f : α → β}
theorem ncard_image_le (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (f '' s).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_image_le
theorem ncard_image_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| H.encard_image
theorem injOn_of_ncard_image_eq (h : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.image _).cast_ncard_eq] at h
exact hs.injOn_of_encard_image_eq h
theorem ncard_image_iff (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(f '' s).ncard = s.ncard ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h ↦ injOn_of_ncard_image_eq h hs, ncard_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem ncard_image_of_injective (s : Set α) (H : f.Injective) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
theorem ncard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range {s : Set β} (H : f.Injective)
(hs : s ⊆ Set.range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injective _ H, image_preimage_eq_iff.mpr hs]
theorem fiber_ncard_ne_zero_iff_mem_image {y : β} (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
{ x ∈ s | f x = y }.ncard ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ f '' s := by
refine ⟨nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
exact @ncard_ne_zero_of_mem _ ({ x ∈ s | f x = f z }) z (mem_sep hz rfl)
(hs.subset (sep_subset _ _))
@[simp] theorem ncard_map (f : α ↪ β) : (f '' s).ncard = s.ncard :=
ncard_image_of_injective _ f.inj'
@[simp] theorem ncard_subtype (P : α → Prop) (s : Set α) :
{ x : Subtype P | (x : α) ∈ s }.ncard = (s ∩ setOf P).ncard := by
convert (ncard_image_of_injective _ (@Subtype.coe_injective _ P)).symm
ext x
simp [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right]
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_left (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ s.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_left hs
theorem ncard_inter_le_ncard_right (s t : Set α) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s ∩ t).ncard ≤ t.ncard :=
ncard_le_ncard inter_subset_right ht
theorem eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (h : s ⊆ t) (h' : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s = t :=
ht.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' h
(by rwa [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h).cast_ncard_eq] at h')
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_ncard_le (h : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst ↦ eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le hst h ht, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (h : f '' s ⊆ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
f '' s = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le h (ncard_map _).ge hs
theorem sep_of_ncard_eq {a : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : { x ∈ s | P x }.ncard = s.ncard) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : P a :=
sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true.mp (eq_of_subset_of_ncard_le (by simp) h.symm.le hs) _ ha
theorem ncard_lt_ncard (h : s ⊂ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard < t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_lt (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset h.subset).cast_ncard_eq]
exact (ht.subset h.subset).encard_lt_encard h
theorem ncard_strictMono [Finite α] : @StrictMono (Set α) _ _ _ ncard :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ncard_lt_ncard h
theorem ncard_eq_of_bijective {n : ℕ} (f : ∀ i, i < n → α)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a) (hf' : ∀ (i) (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ (i j) (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : s.ncard = n := by
let f' : Fin n → α := fun i ↦ f i.val i.is_lt
suffices himage : s = f' '' Set.univ by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Set.ncard_univ, himage]
exact ncard_image_of_injOn <| fun i _hi j _hj h ↦ Fin.ext <| f_inj i.val j.val i.is_lt j.is_lt h
ext x
simp only [image_univ, mem_range]
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ?_, fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ hf' i hi⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf x hx
use ⟨i, hi⟩
theorem ncard_congr {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (h₁ : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(h₂ : ∀ a b ha hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) (h₃ : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) :
s.ncard = t.ncard := by
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, h₁ _ _⟩
have hbij : f'.Bijective := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
exact h₂ _ _ hx hy hxy
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h₃ y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.ofBijective f' hbij)
theorem ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn {t : Set β} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : InjOn f s)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
have hle := encard_le_encard_of_injOn hf f_inj
to_encard_tac; rwa [ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.finite_of_encard_le hle).cast_ncard_eq]
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_ncard_lt_of_maps_to {t : Set β} (hc : t.ncard < s.ncard) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
by_contra h'
simp only [Ne, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not] at h'
exact (ncard_le_ncard_of_injOn f hf h' ht).not_lt hc
theorem le_ncard_of_inj_on_range {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
n ≤ s.ncard := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _ hs]
apply Finset.le_card_of_inj_on_range <;> simpa
theorem surj_on_of_inj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : t.ncard ≤ s.ncard)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
intro b hb
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have finj : f'.Injective := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
simp only [f', Subtype.mk.injEq] at hxy ⊢
apply hinj _ _ hx hy hxy
have hft := ht.fintype
have hft' := Fintype.ofInjective f' finj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
convert @Finset.surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f'' _ _ _ _ (by simpa) using 1
· simp [f'']
· simp [f'', hf]
· intros a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h
rw [mem_toFinset] at ha₁ ha₂
exact hinj _ _ ha₁ ha₂ h
rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_ncard_le {t : Set β} (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : s.ncard ≤ t.ncard) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
a₁ = a₂ := by
classical
set f' : s → t := fun x ↦ ⟨f x.1 x.2, hf _ _⟩
have hsurj : f'.Surjective := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hsurj y hy
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.exists]
exact ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩
haveI := hs.fintype
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective _ hsurj
set f'' : ∀ a, a ∈ s.toFinset → β := fun a h ↦ f a (by simpa using h)
exact
@Finset.inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ _ _ t.toFinset f''
(fun a ha ↦ by { rw [mem_toFinset] at ha ⊢; exact hf a ha }) (by simpa)
(by { rwa [← ncard_eq_toFinset_card', ← ncard_eq_toFinset_card'] }) a₁
(by simpa) a₂ (by simpa) (by simpa)
@[simp] theorem ncard_coe {α : Type*} (s : Set α) :
Set.ncard (Set.univ : Set (Set.Elem s)) = s.ncard :=
Set.ncard_congr (fun a ha ↦ ↑a) (fun a ha ↦ a.prop) (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma ncard_graphOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : (s.graphOn f).ncard = s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_image_of_injOn fst_injOn_graph, image_fst_graphOn]
section Lattice
| theorem ncard_union_add_ncard_inter (s t : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)
(ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s ∪ t).ncard + (s ∩ t).ncard = s.ncard + t.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, ht.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.union ht).cast_ncard_eq,
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 845 | 847 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V]
[AddTorsor V P] (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
variable {R} in
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
simp_rw [affineSegment, lineMap_same, AffineMap.coe_const, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
end OrderedRing
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
variable {R}
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
alias ⟨_, Wbtw.mem_segment⟩ := mem_segment_iff_wbtw
lemma Convex.mem_of_wbtw {p₀ p₁ p₂ : V} {s : Set V} (hs : Convex R s) (h₀₁₂ : Wbtw R p₀ p₁ p₂)
(h₀ : p₀ ∈ s) (h₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : p₁ ∈ s := hs.segment_subset h₀ h₂ h₀₁₂.mem_segment
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
end OrderedRing
lemma AffineSubspace.mem_of_wbtw {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxyz : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) (hz : z ∈ s) : y ∈ s := by obtain ⟨ε, -, rfl⟩ := hxyz; exact lineMap_mem _ hx hz
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
have : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap := f.injective
-- `refine` or `exact` are very slow, `apply` is fast. Please check before golfing.
apply this.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
variable (R)
section OrderedRing
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
end OrderedRing
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
variable {R}
variable [IsOrderedRing R]
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
simp
rw [or_iff_right hxy, Wbtw, affineSegment, (lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Sbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne, and_comm, and_congr_right]
intro hxy
rw [(lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Wbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
wbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Sbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 :=
sbtw_lineMap_iff
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment, Set.mem_image]
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_ring]
simp
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_zero_one_iff]
omit [IsOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Sbtw, wbtw_zero_one_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Ioo]
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1.1.lt_of_ne (Ne.symm h.2.1), h.1.2.lt_of_ne h.2.2⟩, fun h =>
⟨⟨h.1.le, h.2.le⟩, h.1.ne', h.2.ne⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_zero_one_iff]
|
theorem Wbtw.trans_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : Wbtw R w x z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨t₂ * t₁, ⟨mul_nonneg ht₂.1 ht₁.1, mul_le_one₀ ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2⟩, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 418 | 422 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
| WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 351 | 361 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integral
/-!
# The meta properties of integral ring homomorphisms.
-/
namespace RingHom
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct Algebra.TensorProduct
theorem isIntegral_stableUnderComposition : StableUnderComposition fun f => f.IsIntegral := by
introv R hf hg; exact hf.trans _ _ hg
theorem isIntegral_respectsIso : RespectsIso fun f => f.IsIntegral := by
apply isIntegral_stableUnderComposition.respectsIso
introv x
| rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x]
apply RingHom.isIntegralElem_map
theorem isIntegral_isStableUnderBaseChange : IsStableUnderBaseChange fun f => f.IsIntegral := by
refine IsStableUnderBaseChange.mk _ isIntegral_respectsIso ?_
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RingHom/Integral.lean | 28 | 32 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
/-!
# Gluing data
We define `GlueData` as a family of data needed to glue topological spaces, schemes, etc. We
provide the API to realize it as a multispan diagram, and also state lemmas about its
interaction with a functor that preserves certain pullbacks.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u₁ u₂
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v} C] {C' : Type u₂} [Category.{v} C']
/-- A gluing datum consists of
1. An index type `J`
2. An object `U i` for each `i : J`.
3. An object `V i j` for each `i j : J`.
4. A monomorphism `f i j : V i j ⟶ U i` for each `i j : J`.
5. A transition map `t i j : V i j ⟶ V j i` for each `i j : J`.
such that
6. `f i i` is an isomorphism.
7. `t i i` is the identity.
8. The pullback for `f i j` and `f i k` exists.
9. `V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V i j ⟶ V j i` factors through `V j k ×[U j] V j i ⟶ V j i` via some
`t' : V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V j k ×[U j] V j i`.
10. `t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _`.
-/
structure GlueData where
/-- The index type `J` of a gluing datum -/
J : Type v
/-- For each `i : J`, an object `U i` -/
U : J → C
/-- For each `i j : J`, an object `V i j` -/
V : J × J → C
/-- For each `i j : J`, a monomorphism `f i j : V i j ⟶ U i` -/
f : ∀ i j, V (i, j) ⟶ U i
f_mono : ∀ i j, Mono (f i j) := by infer_instance
f_hasPullback : ∀ i j k, HasPullback (f i j) (f i k) := by infer_instance
f_id : ∀ i, IsIso (f i i) := by infer_instance
/-- For each `i j : J`, a transition map `t i j : V i j ⟶ V j i` -/
t : ∀ i j, V (i, j) ⟶ V (j, i)
t_id : ∀ i, t i i = 𝟙 _
/-- The morphism via which `V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V i j ⟶ V j i` factors through
`V j k ×[U j] V j i ⟶ V j i` -/
t' : ∀ i j k, pullback (f i j) (f i k) ⟶ pullback (f j k) (f j i)
t_fac : ∀ i j k, t' i j k ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = pullback.fst _ _ ≫ t i j
cocycle : ∀ i j k, t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _
attribute [simp] GlueData.t_id
attribute [instance] GlueData.f_id GlueData.f_mono GlueData.f_hasPullback
attribute [reassoc] GlueData.t_fac GlueData.cocycle
namespace GlueData
variable {C}
variable (D : GlueData C)
@[simp]
theorem t'_iij (i j : D.J) : D.t' i i j = (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom := by
have eq₁ := D.t_fac i i j
have eq₂ := (IsIso.eq_comp_inv (D.f i i)).mpr (@pullback.condition _ _ _ _ _ _ (D.f i j) _)
rw [D.t_id, Category.comp_id, eq₂] at eq₁
have eq₃ := (IsIso.eq_comp_inv (D.f i i)).mp eq₁
rw [Category.assoc, ← pullback.condition, ← Category.assoc] at eq₃
exact
Mono.right_cancellation _ _
((Mono.right_cancellation _ _ eq₃).trans (pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst _ _).symm)
theorem t'_jii (i j : D.J) : D.t' j i i = pullback.fst _ _ ≫ D.t j i ≫ inv (pullback.snd _ _) := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← D.t_fac]
simp
theorem t'_iji (i j : D.J) : D.t' i j i = pullback.fst _ _ ≫ D.t i j ≫ inv (pullback.snd _ _) := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← D.t_fac]
simp
@[reassoc, elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem t_inv (i j : D.J) : D.t i j ≫ D.t j i = 𝟙 _ := by
have eq : (pullbackSymmetry (D.f i i) (D.f i j)).hom =
pullback.snd _ _ ≫ inv (pullback.fst _ _) := by simp
have := D.cocycle i j i
rw [D.t'_iij, D.t'_jii, D.t'_iji, fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq, eq] at this
simp only [Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc] at this
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp, ← Category.assoc, IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
simpa using this
theorem t'_inv (i j k : D.J) :
D.t' i j k ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ D.t' j i k ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom = 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← cancel_mono (pullback.fst (D.f i j) (D.f i k))]
simp [t_fac, t_fac_assoc]
instance t_isIso (i j : D.J) : IsIso (D.t i j) :=
⟨⟨D.t j i, D.t_inv _ _, D.t_inv _ _⟩⟩
instance t'_isIso (i j k : D.J) : IsIso (D.t' i j k) :=
⟨⟨D.t' j k i ≫ D.t' k i j, D.cocycle _ _ _, by simpa using D.cocycle _ _ _⟩⟩
@[reassoc]
theorem t'_comp_eq_pullbackSymmetry (i j k : D.J) :
D.t' j k i ≫ D.t' k i j =
(pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ D.t' j i k ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom := by
trans inv (D.t' i j k)
· exact IsIso.eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id (D.cocycle _ _ _)
· rw [← cancel_mono (pullback.fst (D.f i j) (D.f i k))]
simp [t_fac, t_fac_assoc]
/-- (Implementation) The disjoint union of `U i`. -/
def sigmaOpens [HasCoproduct D.U] : C :=
∐ D.U
/-- (Implementation) The diagram to take colimit of. -/
def diagram : MultispanIndex (.prod D.J) C where
left := D.V
right := D.U
fst := fun ⟨i, j⟩ => D.f i j
snd := fun ⟨i, j⟩ => D.t i j ≫ D.f j i
@[simp]
theorem diagram_fst (i j : D.J) : D.diagram.fst ⟨i, j⟩ = D.f i j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagram_snd (i j : D.J) : D.diagram.snd ⟨i, j⟩ = D.t i j ≫ D.f j i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagram_left : D.diagram.left = D.V :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagram_right : D.diagram.right = D.U :=
rfl
section
variable [HasMulticoequalizer D.diagram]
/-- The glued object given a family of gluing data. -/
def glued : C :=
multicoequalizer D.diagram
/-- The map `D.U i ⟶ D.glued` for each `i`. -/
def ι (i : D.J) : D.U i ⟶ D.glued :=
Multicoequalizer.π D.diagram i
@[elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem glue_condition (i j : D.J) : D.t i j ≫ D.f j i ≫ D.ι j = D.f i j ≫ D.ι i :=
(Category.assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (Multicoequalizer.condition D.diagram ⟨i, j⟩).symm
/-- The pullback cone spanned by `V i j ⟶ U i` and `V i j ⟶ U j`.
This will often be a pullback diagram. -/
def vPullbackCone (i j : D.J) : PullbackCone (D.ι i) (D.ι j) :=
PullbackCone.mk (D.f i j) (D.t i j ≫ D.f j i) (by simp)
variable [HasColimits C]
/-- The projection `∐ D.U ⟶ D.glued` given by the colimit. -/
def π : D.sigmaOpens ⟶ D.glued :=
Multicoequalizer.sigmaπ D.diagram
instance π_epi : Epi D.π := by
unfold π
infer_instance
end
theorem types_π_surjective (D : GlueData Type*) : Function.Surjective D.π :=
(epi_iff_surjective _).mp inferInstance
theorem types_ι_jointly_surjective (D : GlueData (Type v)) (x : D.glued) :
∃ (i : _) (y : D.U i), D.ι i y = x := by
delta CategoryTheory.GlueData.ι
simp_rw [← Multicoequalizer.ι_sigmaπ D.diagram]
rcases D.types_π_surjective x with ⟨x', rfl⟩
--have := colimit.isoColimitCocone (Types.coproductColimitCocone _)
rw [← show (colimit.isoColimitCocone (Types.coproductColimitCocone.{v, v} _)).inv _ = x' from
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom
(colimit.isoColimitCocone (Types.coproductColimitCocone _)).hom_inv_id x']
rcases (colimit.isoColimitCocone (Types.coproductColimitCocone _)).hom x' with ⟨i, y⟩
exact ⟨i, y, by
simp [← Multicoequalizer.ι_sigmaπ]
rfl ⟩
variable (F : C ⥤ C')
section
variable [∀ i j k, PreservesLimit (cospan (D.f i j) (D.f i k)) F]
instance (i j k : D.J) : HasPullback (F.map (D.f i j)) (F.map (D.f i k)) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, isLimitOfHasPullbackOfPreservesLimit F (D.f i j) (D.f i k)⟩⟩⟩
/-- A functor that preserves the pullbacks of `f i j` and `f i k` can map a family of glue data. -/
@[simps]
def mapGlueData : GlueData C' where
J := D.J
U i := F.obj (D.U i)
V i := F.obj (D.V i)
f i j := F.map (D.f i j)
f_mono _ _ := preserves_mono_of_preservesLimit _ _
f_id _ := inferInstance
t i j := F.map (D.t i j)
t_id i := by
simp [D.t_id i]
t' i j k :=
(PreservesPullback.iso F (D.f i j) (D.f i k)).inv ≫
F.map (D.t' i j k) ≫ (PreservesPullback.iso F (D.f j k) (D.f j i)).hom
t_fac i j k := by simpa [Iso.inv_comp_eq] using congr_arg (fun f => F.map f) (D.t_fac i j k)
cocycle i j k := by
simp only [Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc, D.cocycle,
Iso.inv_hom_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- The diagram of the image of a `GlueData` under a functor `F` is naturally isomorphic to the
original diagram of the `GlueData` via `F`.
-/
def diagramIso : D.diagram.multispan ⋙ F ≅ (D.mapGlueData F).diagram.multispan :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun x =>
match x with
| WalkingMultispan.left _ => Iso.refl _
| WalkingMultispan.right _ => Iso.refl _)
(by
rintro (⟨_, _⟩ | _) _ (_ | _ | _)
· erw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id]
rfl
· erw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
rfl
· erw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Functor.map_comp]
rfl
· erw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem diagramIso_app_left (i : D.J × D.J) :
(D.diagramIso F).app (WalkingMultispan.left i) = Iso.refl _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagramIso_app_right (i : D.J) :
(D.diagramIso F).app (WalkingMultispan.right i) = Iso.refl _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagramIso_hom_app_left (i : D.J × D.J) :
(D.diagramIso F).hom.app (WalkingMultispan.left i) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagramIso_hom_app_right (i : D.J) :
(D.diagramIso F).hom.app (WalkingMultispan.right i) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagramIso_inv_app_left (i : D.J × D.J) :
(D.diagramIso F).inv.app (WalkingMultispan.left i) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem diagramIso_inv_app_right (i : D.J) :
(D.diagramIso F).inv.app (WalkingMultispan.right i) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
end
variable [HasMulticoequalizer D.diagram] [PreservesColimit D.diagram.multispan F]
theorem hasColimit_multispan_comp : HasColimit (D.diagram.multispan ⋙ F) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, isColimitOfPreserves _ (colimit.isColimit _)⟩⟩⟩
attribute [local instance] hasColimit_multispan_comp
variable [∀ i j k, PreservesLimit (cospan (D.f i j) (D.f i k)) F]
theorem hasColimit_mapGlueData_diagram : HasMulticoequalizer (D.mapGlueData F).diagram :=
hasColimit_of_iso (D.diagramIso F).symm
attribute [local instance] hasColimit_mapGlueData_diagram
/-- If `F` preserves the gluing, we obtain an iso between the glued objects. -/
def gluedIso : F.obj D.glued ≅ (D.mapGlueData F).glued :=
haveI : HasColimit (MultispanIndex.multispan (diagram (mapGlueData D F))) := inferInstance
preservesColimitIso F D.diagram.multispan ≪≫ Limits.HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (D.diagramIso F)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_gluedIso_hom (i : D.J) : F.map (D.ι i) ≫ (D.gluedIso F).hom = (D.mapGlueData F).ι i := by
haveI : HasColimit (MultispanIndex.multispan (diagram (mapGlueData D F))) := inferInstance
erw [ι_preservesColimitIso_hom_assoc]
rw [HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom]
erw [Category.id_comp]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_gluedIso_inv (i : D.J) : (D.mapGlueData F).ι i ≫ (D.gluedIso F).inv = F.map (D.ι i) := by
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, ι_gluedIso_hom]
/-- If `F` preserves the gluing, and reflects the pullback of `U i ⟶ glued` and `U j ⟶ glued`,
then `F` reflects the fact that `V_pullback_cone` is a pullback. -/
def vPullbackConeIsLimitOfMap (i j : D.J) [ReflectsLimit (cospan (D.ι i) (D.ι j)) F]
(hc : IsLimit ((D.mapGlueData F).vPullbackCone i j)) : IsLimit (D.vPullbackCone i j) := by
apply isLimitOfReflects F
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm _
let e : cospan (F.map (D.ι i)) (F.map (D.ι j)) ≅
cospan ((D.mapGlueData F).ι i) ((D.mapGlueData F).ι j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun x => by
cases x
exacts [D.gluedIso F, Iso.refl _])
(by rintro (_ | _) (_ | _) (_ | _ | _) <;> simp)
apply IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv e _ _
apply hc.ofIsoLimit
refine Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_
rintro (_ | _ | _)
all_goals simp [e]; rfl
/-- If there is a forgetful functor into `Type` that preserves enough (co)limits, then `D.ι` will
be jointly surjective. -/
theorem ι_jointly_surjective (F : C ⥤ Type v) [PreservesColimit D.diagram.multispan F]
[∀ i j k : D.J, PreservesLimit (cospan (D.f i j) (D.f i k)) F] (x : F.obj D.glued) :
∃ (i : _) (y : F.obj (D.U i)), F.map (D.ι i) y = x := by
let e := D.gluedIso F
obtain ⟨i, y, eq⟩ := (D.mapGlueData F).types_ι_jointly_surjective (e.hom x)
replace eq := congr_arg e.inv eq
change ((D.mapGlueData F).ι i ≫ e.inv) y = (e.hom ≫ e.inv) x at eq
rw [e.hom_inv_id, D.ι_gluedIso_inv] at eq
exact ⟨i, y, eq⟩
end GlueData
section GlueData'
/--
This is a variant of `GlueData` that only requires conditions on `V (i, j)` when `i ≠ j`.
See `GlueData.ofGlueData'`
-/
structure GlueData' where
/-- Indexing type of a glue data. -/
J : Type v
/-- Objects of a glue data to be glued. -/
U : J → C
/-- Objects representing the intersections. -/
V : ∀ (i j : J), i ≠ j → C
/-- The inclusion maps of the intersection into the object. -/
f : ∀ i j h, V i j h ⟶ U i
| f_mono : ∀ i j h, Mono (f i j h) := by infer_instance
f_hasPullback : ∀ i j k hij hik, HasPullback (f i j hij) (f i k hik) := by infer_instance
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GlueData.lean | 363 | 364 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Defs
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset `s`
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by `sSup s` and `sInf s`.
Typical examples are `ℝ`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ` with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We express these using the `BddAbove` and `BddBelow` predicates, which we use to prove
most useful properties of `sSup` and `sInf` in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix `sInf` and `sSup` in the statements by `c`, giving `csInf` and `csSup`.
For instance, `sInf_le` is a statement in complete lattices ensuring `sInf s ≤ x`,
while `csInf_le` is the same statement in conditionally complete lattices
with an additional assumption that `s` is bounded below.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of `sSup` and `sInf` from a preorder `α` to `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
-/
variable [Preorder α]
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instSupSet [SupSet α] :
SupSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S =>
if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else if BddAbove ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α) then
↑(sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ (a : WithTop α)) ⁻¹' S : Set α)) else ⊤⟩
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instInfSet [InfSet α] : InfSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S => if S ⊆ {⊤} ∨ ¬BddBelow S then ⊤ else ↑(sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α))⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instSupSet [SupSet α] : SupSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instInfSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instInfSet [InfSet α] :
InfSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instSupSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup⟩
theorem WithTop.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ⊤ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddAbove ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithTop.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊤}) (h's : BddBelow s) :
sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
if_neg <| by simp [hs, h's]
theorem WithBot.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ⊥ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddBelow ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithBot.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊥}) (h's : BddAbove s) :
sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
WithTop.sInf_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[simp]
theorem WithTop.sInf_empty [InfSet α] : sInf (∅ : Set (WithTop α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos <| by simp
theorem WithTop.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with h1 | h2
· cases h1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· exact (h2 (Monotone.map_bddBelow coe_mono h's)).elim
· rw [preimage_image_eq]
exact Option.some_injective _
theorem WithTop.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
change _ = ite _ _ _
rw [if_neg, preimage_image_eq, if_pos hs]
· exact Option.some_injective _
· rintro ⟨x, _, ⟨⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem WithBot.sSup_empty [SupSet α] : sSup (∅ : Set (WithBot α)) = ⊥ :=
WithTop.sInf_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sInf' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sSup' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
end
instance ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] :
LinearOrder α :=
{ ‹ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α› with
min_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂]
max_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂] }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A complete lattice is a conditionally complete lattice, as there are no restrictions
on the properties of sInf and sSup in a complete lattice. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice α :=
{ ‹CompleteLattice α› with
le_csSup := by intros; apply le_sSup; assumption
csSup_le := by intros; apply sSup_le; assumption
csInf_le := by intros; apply sInf_le; assumption
le_csInf := by intros; apply le_sInf; assumption }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot {α : Type*}
[h : CompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α :=
{ CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice, h with
csSup_empty := sSup_empty
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderTop.bddAbove s)).elim
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderBot.bddBelow s)).elim }
namespace OrderDual
instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instInf α, OrderDual.instSup α, OrderDual.instLattice α with
le_csSup := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le (α := α)
csSup_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf (α := α)
le_csInf := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le (α := α)
csInf_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup (α := α) }
instance (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instConditionallyCompleteLattice α, OrderDual.instLinearOrder α with
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow (α := α)
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove (α := α) }
end OrderDual
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_csSup (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : a ≤ sSup s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup s a h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_le (h₁ : BddBelow s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : a ≤ sInf s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csSup_of_le (hs : BddAbove s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_csSup hs hb)
theorem csInf_le_of_le (hs : BddBelow s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (csInf_le hs hb) h
theorem csSup_le_csSup (ht : BddAbove t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
csSup_le hs fun _ ha => le_csSup ht (h ha)
theorem csInf_le_csInf (ht : BddBelow t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_csInf hs fun _ ha => csInf_le ht (h ha)
theorem le_csSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le hs hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem csInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_csInf hs hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => csInf_le h⟩
theorem isLUB_csSup (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ => le_csSup H, fun _ => csSup_le ne⟩
theorem isGLB_csInf (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => csInf_le H, fun _ => le_csInf ne⟩
theorem IsLUB.csSup_eq (H : IsLUB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sSup s = a :=
(isLUB_csSup ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A greatest element of a set is the supremum of this set. -/
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_eq (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s = a :=
H.isLUB.csSup_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_mem (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s ∈ s :=
H.csSup_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem IsGLB.csInf_eq (H : IsGLB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = a :=
(isGLB_csInf ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A least element of a set is the infimum of this set. -/
theorem IsLeast.csInf_eq (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s = a :=
H.isGLB.csInf_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsLeast.csInf_mem (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s ∈ s :=
H.csInf_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem subset_Icc_csInf_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) : s ⊆ Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
fun _ hx => ⟨csInf_le hb hx, le_csSup ha hx⟩
theorem csSup_le_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup hs hb)
theorem le_csInf_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_csInf hs hb)
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sSup (lowerBounds s) = sInf s :=
(isLUB_csSup h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isGLB_csInf hs h).isLUB
theorem csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sInf (upperBounds s) = sSup s :=
(isGLB_csInf h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isLUB_csSup hs h).isGLB
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddBelow (range f)) :
sSup (lowerBounds (range f)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem csInf_upperBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
sInf (upperBounds (range f)) = ⨆ i, f i :=
csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) (hs : BddBelow s) : x ∉ s :=
fun hx => lt_irrefl _ (h.trans_le (csInf_le hs hx))
theorem not_mem_of_csSup_lt {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : sSup s < x) (hs : BddAbove s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (hs : s.Nonempty) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(H' : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(eq_of_le_of_not_lt (csSup_le hs H)) fun hb =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := H' _ hb
lt_irrefl _ <| ha'.trans_le <| le_csSup ⟨b, H⟩ ha
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
s.Nonempty → (∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- `b < sSup s` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, when `s` is bounded above.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness above for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem lt_csSup_of_lt (hs : BddAbove s) (ha : a ∈ s) (h : b < a) : b < sSup s :=
lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_csSup hs ha)
/-- `sInf s < b` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, when `s` is bounded below.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness below for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem csInf_lt_of_lt : BddBelow s → a ∈ s → a < b → sInf s < b :=
lt_csSup_of_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If all elements of a nonempty set `s` are less than or equal to all elements
of a nonempty set `t`, then there exists an element between these sets. -/
theorem exists_between_of_forall_le (sne : s.Nonempty) (tne : t.Nonempty)
(hst : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : (upperBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t).Nonempty :=
⟨sInf t, fun x hx => le_csInf tne <| hst x hx, fun _ hy => csInf_le (sne.mono hst) hy⟩
/-- The supremum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_singleton (a : α) : sSup {a} = a :=
isGreatest_singleton.csSup_eq
/-- The infimum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_singleton (a : α) : sInf {a} = a :=
isLeast_singleton.csInf_eq
theorem csSup_pair (a b : α) : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair _ _ a b).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
theorem csInf_pair (a b : α) : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair _ _ a b).csInf_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
/-- If a set is bounded below and above, and nonempty, its infimum is less than or equal to
its supremum. -/
theorem csInf_le_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_csInf ne hb) (isLUB_csSup ne ha) ne
/-- The `sSup` of a union of two sets is the max of the suprema of each subset, under the
assumptions that all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_union (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddAbove t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).union (isLUB_csSup tne ht)).csSup_eq sne.inl
/-- The `sInf` of a union of two sets is the min of the infima of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem csInf_union (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddBelow t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
csSup_union (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne ht tne
/-- The supremum of an intersection of two sets is bounded by the minimum of the suprema of each
set, if all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_inter_le (hs : BddAbove s) (ht : BddAbove t) (hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
(csSup_le hst) fun _ hx => le_inf (le_csSup hs hx.1) (le_csSup ht hx.2)
/-- The infimum of an intersection of two sets is bounded below by the maximum of the
infima of each set, if all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem le_csInf_inter :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
csSup_inter_le (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- The supremum of `insert a s` is the maximum of `a` and the supremum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded above. -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_insert (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).insert a).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty a s)
/-- The infimum of `insert a s` is the minimum of `a` and the infimum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded below. -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_insert (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
csSup_insert (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sInf (Icc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ici : sInf (Ici a) = a :=
isLeast_Ici.csInf_eq
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ico (h : a < b) : sInf (Ico a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioc [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sInf (Ioi a) = a :=
csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt nonempty_Ioi (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioo a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioo h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sSup (Icc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ico [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ico a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ico h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iic : sSup (Iic a) = a :=
isGreatest_Iic.csSup_eq
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iio [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sSup (Iio a) = a :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt nonempty_Iio (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa [and_comm] using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioc (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioo a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioo h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that
1) `b` is an upper bound
2) every other upper bound `b'` satisfies `b ≤ b'`. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_is_forall_le_of_forall_le_imp_ge (hs : s.Nonempty) (h_is_ub : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h_b_le_ub : ∀ ub, (∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ ub) → b ≤ ub) : sSup s = b :=
(csSup_le hs h_is_ub).antisymm ((h_b_le_ub _) fun _ => le_csSup ⟨b, h_is_ub⟩)
lemma sup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] (h : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_csSup (OrderTop.bddAbove s) h
lemma inf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] (h : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
instance Pi.conditionallyCompleteLattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, ConditionallyCompleteLattice (α i)] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (∀ i, α i) :=
{ Pi.instLattice, Pi.supSet, Pi.infSet with
le_csSup := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
le_csSup ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
csSup_le := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(csSup_le (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i
csInf_le := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
csInf_le ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
le_csInf := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(le_csInf (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i }
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- When `b < sSup s`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : b < sSup s) : ∃ a ∈ s, b < a := by
contrapose! hb
exact csSup_le hs hb
/-- When `sInf s < b`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_csInf_lt (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : sInf s < b) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) hs hb
theorem lt_csSup_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_csSup hs hb
theorem csInf_lt_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s < a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_csInf hs hb
@[simp] lemma csSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs
@[simp] lemma ciSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup ∅ :=
csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
lemma csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup univ := by
rw [csSup_of_not_bddAbove hs, csSup_of_not_bddAbove (s := univ)]
contrapose! hs
exact hs.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma ciSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove hf
@[simp] lemma csInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs
@[simp] lemma ciInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf ∅ :=
csInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
lemma csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
lemma ciInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf univ :=
csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same supremum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup s = sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|s_ne
· have : t = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun y yt ↦ by simpa using ht y yt)
rw [this]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with rfl|t_ne
· have : s = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x xs ↦ by simpa using hs x xs)
rw [this]
by_cases B : BddAbove s ∨ BddAbove t
· have Bs : BddAbove s := by
rcases B with hB|⟨b, hb⟩
· exact hB
· refine ⟨b, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (hb hy)
have Bt : BddAbove t := by
rcases B with ⟨b, hb⟩|hB
· refine ⟨b, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, hx, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (hb hx)
· exact hB
apply le_antisymm
· apply csSup_le s_ne (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, yt, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (le_csSup Bt yt)
· apply csSup_le t_ne (fun y hy ↦ ?_)
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, xs, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (le_csSup Bs xs)
· simp [csSup_of_not_bddAbove, (not_or.1 B).1, (not_or.1 B).2]
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same infimum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csInf_eq_csInf_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf s = sInf t :=
csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ht
lemma sSup_iUnion_Iic (f : ι → α) : sSup (⋃ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = ⨆ i, f i := by
apply csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le
· rintro x ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_range_self _, hi⟩
· rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_iUnion_of_mem i le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
lemma sInf_iUnion_Ici (f : ι → α) : sInf (⋃ (i : ι), Ici (f i)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
sSup_iUnion_Iic (α := αᵒᵈ) f
theorem csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) hs
theorem csSup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
open Function
variable [WellFoundedLT α]
theorem sInf_eq_argmin_on (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = argminOn id s hs :=
IsLeast.csInf_eq ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun _ ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem isLeast_csInf (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLeast s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_eq_argmin_on hs]
exact ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun a ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff' (hs : s.Nonempty) : b ≤ sInf s ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
le_isGLB_iff (isLeast_csInf hs).isGLB
theorem csInf_mem (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s :=
(isLeast_csInf hs).1
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
theorem Monotone.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
/-!
### Lemmas about a conditionally complete linear order with bottom element
In this case we have `Sup ∅ = ⊥`, so we can drop some `Nonempty`/`Set.Nonempty` assumptions.
-/
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
@[simp]
theorem csInf_univ [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [OrderBot α] : sInf (univ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.csInf_eq
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem csSup_empty : (sSup ∅ : α) = ⊥ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.csSup_empty
theorem isLUB_csSup' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp only [csSup_empty, isLUB_empty]
· exact isLUB_csSup hne hs
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `csSup_le_iff`. -/
theorem csSup_le_iff' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) {a : α} : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup' hs)
theorem csSup_le' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ upperBounds s) : sSup s ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' ⟨a, h⟩).2 h
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `lt_csSup_iff`. -/
theorem lt_csSup_iff' (hb : BddAbove s) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
simpa only [not_le, not_forall₂, exists_prop] using (csSup_le_iff' hb).not
theorem le_csSup_iff' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : BddAbove s) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le' hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff'' {s : Set α} {a : α} (ne : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b : α, b ∈ s → a ≤ b :=
le_csInf_iff (OrderBot.bddBelow _) ne
theorem csInf_le' (h : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a := csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) h
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a < sSup s) : ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
contrapose! h
exact csSup_le' h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf' {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf h (OrderBot.bddBelow s)
theorem csInf_le_csInf' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : t.Nonempty) (h₂ : t ⊆ s) : sInf s ≤ sInf t :=
csInf_le_csInf (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le_csSup' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove t) (h₂ : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl | h
· rw [csSup_empty]
exact bot_le
· exact csSup_le_csSup h₁ h h₂
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
namespace WithTop
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α]
/-- The `sSup` of a non-empty set is its least upper bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isLUB_sSup' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· contradiction
apply coe_le_coe.2
exact le_csSup h₂ ha
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact False.elim (not_top_le_coe a (ha h₁))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exact absurd hb h₁
· exact ⟨b, hb⟩
· intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_rfl
· exfalso
apply h₂
use b
intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs
· simp [sSup]
· exact isLUB_sSup' hs
/-- The `sInf` of a bounded-below set is its greatest lower bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isGLB_sInf' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro a ha
exact top_le_iff.2 (Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (h ha))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csInf_le ?_ ha)
rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exfalso
apply h
intro c hc
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← top_le_iff]
exact hb hc
use b
intro c hc
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb hc)
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exfalso
apply h
intro b hb
exact Set.mem_singleton_iff.2 (top_le_iff.1 (ha hb))
· refine coe_le_coe.2 (le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· classical
contrapose! h
rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact mem_singleton ⊤
· exact (not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.2 h ⟨a, ha⟩).elim
· intro b hb
rw [← coe_le_coe]
exact ha hb
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
by_cases hs : BddBelow s
· exact isGLB_sInf' hs
· exfalso
apply hs
use ⊥
intro _ _
exact bot_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop α) where
__ := linearOrder
__ := LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra
le_sSup s := (isLUB_sSup s).1
sSup_le s := (isLUB_sSup s).2
le_sInf s := (isGLB_sInf s).2
sInf_le s := (isGLB_sInf s).1
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sSup'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {s : Set α} (hb : BddAbove s) : ↑(sSup s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sSup' hb, sSup_image]
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sInf'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sInf' hs h's, sInf_image]
end WithTop
namespace Monotone
variable [Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (h_mono : Monotone f)
include h_mono
/-! A monotone function into a conditionally complete lattice preserves the ordering properties of
`sSup` and `sInf`. -/
theorem le_csSup_image {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddAbove s) :
f c ≤ sSup (f '' s) :=
le_csSup (map_bddAbove h_mono h_bdd) (mem_image_of_mem f hcs)
theorem csSup_image_le {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ upperBounds s) :
sSup (f '' s) ≤ f B :=
csSup_le (Nonempty.image f hs) (h_mono.mem_upperBounds_image hB)
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem csInf_image_le {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddBelow s) :
sInf (f '' s) ≤ f c := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact le_csSup_image (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hcs h_bdd
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem le_csInf_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ lowerBounds s) :
f B ≤ sInf (f '' s) := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact csSup_image_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hs hB
end Monotone
lemma MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddBelow (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf (f '' s) = sInf (f '' t) := by
obtain rfl | hs := Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s
· obtain rfl : t = ∅ := by simpa [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] using h
rfl
apply le_antisymm _ (csInf_le_csInf ht (hs.image _) (image_subset _ hst))
refine le_csInf ((hs.mono hst).image f) ?_
simp only [mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro a ha
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hxa⟩ := h a ha
exact csInf_le_of_le (ht.mono (image_subset _ hst)) ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩ (hf (hst hxs) ha hxa)
lemma MonotoneOn.csSup_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddAbove (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup (f '' s) = sSup (f '' t) :=
MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) ht hf.dual hst h
/-!
### Supremum/infimum of `Set.image2`
A collection of lemmas showing what happens to the suprema/infima of `s` and `t` when mapped under
a binary function whose partial evaluations are lower/upper adjoints of Galois connections.
-/
section
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
variable {l u : α → β → γ} {l₁ u₁ : β → γ → α} {l₂ u₂ : α → γ → β}
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s)
(ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddAbove t) : sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sSup t) := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [csSup_le_iff (hs₁.image2 (fun _ => (h₁ _).monotone_l) (fun _ => (h₂ _).monotone_l) ht₁)
(hs₀.image2 ht₀),
forall_mem_image2, forall₂_swap, (h₂ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff ht₁ ht₀]
simp_rw [← (h₂ _).le_iff_le, (h₁ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff hs₁ hs₀]
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) (u₁ := l₁) (u₂ := l₂)
(fun _ => (h₁ _).dual) fun _ => (h₂ _).dual
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₂ a) (u a ∘ ofDual)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₁ b) (swap u b ∘ ofDual))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₁ b) (swap u b ∘ ofDual))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₂ a) (u a ∘ ofDual)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sSup s) (sSup t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
end
section WithTopBot
/-!
### Complete lattice structure on `WithTop (WithBot α)`
If `α` is a `ConditionallyCompleteLattice`, then we show that `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
also inherit the structure of conditionally complete lattices. Furthermore, we show
that `WithTop (WithBot α)` and `WithBot (WithTop α)` naturally inherit the structure of a
complete lattice. Note that for `α` a conditionally complete lattice, `sSup` and `sInf` both return
junk values for sets which are empty or unbounded. The extension of `sSup` to `WithTop α` fixes
the unboundedness problem and the extension to `WithBot α` fixes the problem with
the empty set.
This result can be used to show that the extended reals `[-∞, ∞]` are a complete linear order.
-/
/-- Adding a top element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (WithTop α) :=
{ lattice, instSupSet, instInfSet with
le_csSup := fun _ a _ haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS
csSup_le := fun _ _ hS haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' hS).2 haS
csInf_le := fun _ _ hS haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' hS).1 haS
le_csInf := fun _ a _ haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS }
/-- Adding a bottom element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance WithBot.conditionallyCompleteLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.lattice with
le_csSup := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).csInf_le
csSup_le := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_csInf
csInf_le := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_csSup
le_csInf := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).csSup_le }
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice (WithTop (WithBot α)) :=
{ instInfSet, instSupSet, boundedOrder, lattice with
le_sSup := fun _ a haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS
sSup_le := fun S a ha => by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· show ite _ _ _ ≤ a
simp [h]
· exact (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' h).2 ha
sInf_le := fun S a haS =>
show ite _ _ _ ≤ a by
simp only [OrderBot.bddBelow, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h₁
· cases a
· exact le_rfl
cases h₁ haS
· cases a
· exact le_top
· apply WithTop.coe_le_coe.2
refine csInf_le ?_ haS
use ⊥
intro b _
exact bot_le
le_sInf := fun _ a haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS }
noncomputable instance WithTop.WithBot.completeLinearOrder {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop (WithBot α)) :=
-- FIXME: Spread notation doesn't work
{ completeLattice, linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
noncomputable instance WithBot.WithTop.completeLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice (WithBot (WithTop α)) :=
{ instInfSet, instSupSet, instBoundedOrder, lattice with
le_sSup := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf_le
sSup_le := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_sInf
sInf_le := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_sSup
le_sInf := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup_le }
noncomputable instance WithBot.WithTop.completeLinearOrder {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder (WithBot (WithTop α)) :=
{ completeLattice, linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
end WithTopBot
| Mathlib/Order/ConditionallyCompleteLattice/Basic.lean | 1,226 | 1,227 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
/-!
# Balanced Core and Balanced Hull
## Main definitions
* `balancedCore`: The largest balanced subset of a set `s`.
* `balancedHull`: The smallest balanced superset of a set `s`.
## Main statements
* `balancedCore_eq_iInter`: Characterization of the balanced core as an intersection over subsets.
* `nhds_basis_closed_balanced`: The closed balanced sets form a basis of the neighborhood filter.
## Implementation details
The balanced core and hull are implemented differently: for the core we take the obvious definition
of the union over all balanced sets that are contained in `s`, whereas for the hull, we take the
union over `r • s`, for `r` the scalars with `‖r‖ ≤ 1`. We show that `balancedHull` has the
defining properties of a hull in `Balanced.balancedHull_subset_of_subset` and `subset_balancedHull`.
For the core we need slightly stronger assumptions to obtain a characterization as an intersection,
this is `balancedCore_eq_iInter`.
## References
* [Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
## Tags
balanced
-/
open Set Pointwise Topology Filter
variable {𝕜 E ι : Type*}
section balancedHull
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E} {x : E}
/-- The largest balanced subset of `s`. -/
def balancedCore (s : Set E) :=
⋃₀ { t : Set E | Balanced 𝕜 t ∧ t ⊆ s }
/-- Helper definition to prove `balanced_core_eq_iInter` -/
def balancedCoreAux (s : Set E) :=
⋂ (r : 𝕜) (_ : 1 ≤ ‖r‖), r • s
/-- The smallest balanced superset of `s`. -/
def balancedHull (s : Set E) :=
⋃ (r : 𝕜) (_ : ‖r‖ ≤ 1), r • s
variable {𝕜}
theorem balancedCore_subset (s : Set E) : balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ ht => ht.2
theorem balancedCore_empty : balancedCore 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty (balancedCore_subset _)
theorem mem_balancedCore_iff : x ∈ balancedCore 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ t, Balanced 𝕜 t ∧ t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [balancedCore, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc]
theorem smul_balancedCore_subset (s : Set E) {a : 𝕜} (ha : ‖a‖ ≤ 1) :
a • balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ balancedCore 𝕜 s := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [mem_balancedCore_iff] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨t, ht1, ht2, hy⟩
exact ⟨t, ⟨ht1, ht2⟩, ht1 a ha (smul_mem_smul_set hy)⟩
theorem balancedCore_balanced (s : Set E) : Balanced 𝕜 (balancedCore 𝕜 s) := fun _ =>
smul_balancedCore_subset s
/-- The balanced core of `t` is maximal in the sense that it contains any balanced subset
`s` of `t`. -/
theorem Balanced.subset_balancedCore_of_subset (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (h : s ⊆ t) :
s ⊆ balancedCore 𝕜 t :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨hs, h⟩
lemma Balanced.balancedCore_eq (h : Balanced 𝕜 s) : balancedCore 𝕜 s = s :=
le_antisymm (balancedCore_subset _) (h.subset_balancedCore_of_subset (subset_refl _))
theorem mem_balancedCoreAux_iff : x ∈ balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ r : 𝕜, 1 ≤ ‖r‖ → x ∈ r • s :=
mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_balancedHull_iff : x ∈ balancedHull 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, ‖r‖ ≤ 1 ∧ x ∈ r • s := by
simp [balancedHull]
/-- The balanced hull of `s` is minimal in the sense that it is contained in any balanced superset
`t` of `s`. -/
theorem Balanced.balancedHull_subset_of_subset (ht : Balanced 𝕜 t) (h : s ⊆ t) :
balancedHull 𝕜 s ⊆ t := by
intros x hx
obtain ⟨r, hr, y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_balancedHull_iff.1 hx
exact ht.smul_mem hr (h hy)
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem balancedHull_mono (hst : s ⊆ t) : balancedHull 𝕜 s ⊆ balancedHull 𝕜 t := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_balancedHull_iff] at *
obtain ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := hx
use r
exact ⟨hr₁, smul_set_mono hst hr₂⟩
end SMul
section Module
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E}
theorem balancedCore_zero_mem (hs : (0 : E) ∈ s) : (0 : E) ∈ balancedCore 𝕜 s :=
mem_balancedCore_iff.2 ⟨0, balanced_zero, zero_subset.2 hs, Set.zero_mem_zero⟩
theorem balancedCore_nonempty_iff : (balancedCore 𝕜 s).Nonempty ↔ (0 : E) ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => zero_subset.1 <| (zero_smul_set h).superset.trans <|
(balancedCore_balanced s (0 : 𝕜) <| norm_zero.trans_le zero_le_one).trans <|
balancedCore_subset _,
fun h => ⟨0, balancedCore_zero_mem h⟩⟩
lemma Balanced.zero_mem (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (hs_nonempty : s.Nonempty) : (0 : E) ∈ s := by
rw [← hs.balancedCore_eq] at hs_nonempty
exact balancedCore_nonempty_iff.mp hs_nonempty
variable (𝕜) in
theorem subset_balancedHull [NormOneClass 𝕜] {s : Set E} : s ⊆ balancedHull 𝕜 s := fun _ hx =>
mem_balancedHull_iff.2 ⟨1, norm_one.le, _, hx, one_smul _ _⟩
theorem balancedHull.balanced (s : Set E) : Balanced 𝕜 (balancedHull 𝕜 s) := by
intro a ha
simp_rw [balancedHull, smul_set_iUnion₂, subset_def, mem_iUnion₂]
rintro x ⟨r, hr, hx⟩
rw [← smul_assoc] at hx
exact ⟨a • r, (norm_mul_le _ _).trans (mul_le_one₀ ha (norm_nonneg r) hr), hx⟩
open Balanced in
theorem balancedHull_add_subset [NormOneClass 𝕜] {t : Set E} :
balancedHull 𝕜 (s + t) ⊆ balancedHull 𝕜 s + balancedHull 𝕜 t :=
balancedHull_subset_of_subset (add (balancedHull.balanced _) (balancedHull.balanced _))
(add_subset_add (subset_balancedHull _) (subset_balancedHull _))
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s t : Set E}
@[simp]
theorem balancedCoreAux_empty : balancedCoreAux 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) = ∅ := by
simp_rw [balancedCoreAux, iInter₂_eq_empty_iff, smul_set_empty]
exact fun _ => ⟨1, norm_one.ge, not_mem_empty _⟩
theorem balancedCoreAux_subset (s : Set E) : balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s ⊆ s := fun x hx => by
simpa only [one_smul] using mem_balancedCoreAux_iff.1 hx 1 norm_one.ge
theorem balancedCoreAux_balanced (h0 : (0 : E) ∈ balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s) :
Balanced 𝕜 (balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_rw [zero_smul, h0]
rw [mem_balancedCoreAux_iff] at hy ⊢
intro r hr
have h'' : 1 ≤ ‖a⁻¹ • r‖ := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv]
exact one_le_mul_of_one_le_of_one_le ((one_le_inv₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)).2 ha) hr
have h' := hy (a⁻¹ • r) h''
rwa [smul_assoc, mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ h] at h'
theorem balancedCoreAux_maximal (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : Balanced 𝕜 t) : t ⊆ balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s := by
refine fun x hx => mem_balancedCoreAux_iff.2 fun r hr => ?_
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (norm_pos_iff.mp <| zero_lt_one.trans_le hr)]
refine h (ht.smul_mem ?_ hx)
rw [norm_inv]
exact inv_le_one_of_one_le₀ hr
theorem balancedCore_subset_balancedCoreAux : balancedCore 𝕜 s ⊆ balancedCoreAux 𝕜 s :=
balancedCoreAux_maximal (balancedCore_subset s) (balancedCore_balanced s)
theorem balancedCore_eq_iInter (hs : (0 : E) ∈ s) :
balancedCore 𝕜 s = ⋂ (r : 𝕜) (_ : 1 ≤ ‖r‖), r • s := by
refine balancedCore_subset_balancedCoreAux.antisymm ?_
refine (balancedCoreAux_balanced ?_).subset_balancedCore_of_subset (balancedCoreAux_subset s)
exact balancedCore_subset_balancedCoreAux (balancedCore_zero_mem hs)
theorem subset_balancedCore (ht : (0 : E) ∈ t) (hst : ∀ a : 𝕜, ‖a‖ ≤ 1 → a • s ⊆ t) :
s ⊆ balancedCore 𝕜 t := by
rw [balancedCore_eq_iInter ht]
refine subset_iInter₂ fun a ha ↦ ?_
rw [subset_smul_set_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mp <| zero_lt_one.trans_le ha)]
apply hst
| rw [norm_inv]
exact inv_le_one_of_one_le₀ ha
end NormedField
end balancedHull
/-! ### Topological properties -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/BalancedCoreHull.lean | 205 | 212 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
| induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 422 | 428 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,955 | 1,957 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Induction
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.Coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := fun con => by simp_all [Prod.ext_iff]
simp [y1ne]
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y₂ ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp_all
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul] }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
neg_add_cancel := neg_add_cancel
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [MulAction R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
lemma pmul_assoc [SemigroupWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos), coe_mk]
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
end MonoidWithZero
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp [hf]
| insert _ _ has ih =>
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
theorem map_div_of_coprime [GroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {l d : ℕ} (hdl : d ∣ l) (hl : (l / d).Coprime d) (hd : f d ≠ 0) :
f (l / d) = f l / f d := by
apply (div_eq_of_eq_mul hd ..).symm
rw [← hf.right hl, Nat.div_mul_cancel hdl]
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_intro ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk_inj] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
Set.mem_image, exists_prop, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨b1, b2⟩ h
dsimp at h
use ((b1.gcd m, b2.gcd m), (b1.gcd n, b2.gcd n))
rw [← cop.gcd_mul _, ← cop.gcd_mul _, ← h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop h.1,
Nat.gcd_mul_gcd_of_coprime_of_mul_eq_mul cop.symm _]
· rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp [h.2.1, h.2.2]
rw [mul_comm n m, h.1]
· simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
dsimp only
rw [hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_right_right,
hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_left_right]
ring
@[arith_mult]
theorem pmul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f.pmul g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pmul_apply, hf.map_mul_of_coprime cop, hg.map_mul_of_coprime cop]
ring⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem pdiv [CommGroupWithZero R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : IsMultiplicative f)
(hg : IsMultiplicative g) : IsMultiplicative (pdiv f g) :=
⟨by simp [hf, hg], fun {m n} cop => by
simp only [pdiv_apply, map_mul_of_coprime hf cop, map_mul_of_coprime hg cop,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv]
apply mul_mul_mul_comm ⟩
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` and any `n > 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
theorem multiplicative_factorization [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) :=
Nat.multiplicative_factorization f (fun _ _ => hf.2) hf.1 hn
/-- A recapitulation of the definition of multiplicative that is simpler for proofs -/
theorem iff_ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} :
IsMultiplicative f ↔
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n := by
refine and_congr_right' (forall₂_congr fun m n => ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h hmn => ?_⟩)
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
exact h hm hn hmn
/-- Two multiplicative functions `f` and `g` are equal if and only if
they agree on prime powers -/
theorem eq_iff_eq_on_prime_powers [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R)
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (g : ArithmeticFunction R) (hg : g.IsMultiplicative) :
f = g ↔ ∀ p i : ℕ, Nat.Prime p → f (p ^ i) = g (p ^ i) := by
constructor
· intro h p i _
rw [h]
intro h
ext n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero, ArithmeticFunction.map_zero]
rw [multiplicative_factorization f hf hn, multiplicative_factorization g hg hn]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun p hp ↦ h p _ (Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)
@[arith_mult]
theorem prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) :
IsMultiplicative (prodPrimeFactors f) := by
rw [iff_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, prodPrimeFactors_apply, primeFactors_one,
prod_empty, true_and]
intro x y hx hy hxy
have hxy₀ : x * y ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hx hy
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hxy₀, prodPrimeFactors_apply hx, prodPrimeFactors_apply hy,
Nat.primeFactors_mul hx hy, ← Finset.prod_union hxy.disjoint_primeFactors]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) (hg : IsMultiplicative g) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, (f + g) p = (f * g) n := by
rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero]
simp_rw [add_apply (f := f) (g := g)]
rw [Finset.prod_add, mul_apply, sum_divisorsAntidiagonal (f · * g ·),
← divisors_filter_squarefree_of_squarefree hn, sum_divisors_filter_squarefree hn.ne_zero,
factors_eq]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro t ht
rw [t.prod_val, Function.id_def,
← prod_primeFactors_sdiff_of_squarefree hn (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
hf.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n t (Finset.mem_powerset.mp ht),
← hg.map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors n (_ \ t) Finset.sdiff_subset]
theorem lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} :
f (x.lcm y) * f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp only [hx, f.map_zero, zero_mul, Nat.lcm_zero_left, Nat.gcd_zero_left]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp only [hy, f.map_zero, mul_zero, Nat.lcm_zero_right, Nat.gcd_zero_right, zero_mul]
have hgcd_ne_zero : x.gcd y ≠ 0 := gcd_ne_zero_left hx
have hlcm_ne_zero : x.lcm y ≠ 0 := lcm_ne_zero hx hy
have hfi_zero : ∀ {i}, f (i ^ 0) = 1 := by
intro i; rw [Nat.pow_zero, hf.1]
iterate 4 rw [hf.multiplicative_factorization f (by assumption),
Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset _ _ _ (fun _ _ => hfi_zero)
(s := (x.primeFactors ∪ y.primeFactors))]
· rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro p _
rcases Nat.le_or_le (x.factorization p) (y.factorization p) with h | h <;>
simp only [factorization_lcm hx hy, Finsupp.sup_apply, h, sup_of_le_right,
sup_of_le_left, inf_of_le_right, Nat.factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.inf_apply,
inf_of_le_left, mul_comm]
· apply Finset.subset_union_right
· apply Finset.subset_union_left
· rw [factorization_gcd hx hy, Finsupp.support_inf]
apply Finset.inter_subset_union
· simp [factorization_lcm hx hy]
theorem map_gcd [CommGroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} (hf_lcm : f (x.lcm y) ≠ 0) :
f (x.gcd y) = f x * f y / f (x.lcm y) := by
rw [← hf.lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hf_lcm]
theorem map_lcm [CommGroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {x y : ℕ} (hf_gcd : f (x.gcd y) ≠ 0) :
f (x.lcm y) = f x * f y / f (x.gcd y) := by
rw [← hf.lcm_apply_mul_gcd_apply, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hf_gcd]
theorem eq_zero_of_squarefree_of_dvd_eq_zero [MonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {m n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) (hmn : m ∣ n)
(h_zero : f m = 0) :
f n = 0 := by
rcases hmn with ⟨k, rfl⟩
simp only [MulZeroClass.zero_mul, eq_self_iff_true, hf.map_mul_of_coprime
(coprime_of_squarefree_mul hn), h_zero]
end IsMultiplicative
section SpecialFunctions
/-- The identity on `ℕ` as an `ArithmeticFunction`. -/
def id : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨_root_.id, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem id_apply {x : ℕ} : id x = x :=
rfl
/-- `pow k n = n ^ k`, except `pow 0 0 = 0`. -/
def pow (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
id.ppow k
@[simp]
theorem pow_apply {k n : ℕ} : pow k n = if k = 0 ∧ n = 0 then 0 else n ^ k := by
cases k <;> simp [pow]
theorem pow_zero_eq_zeta : pow 0 = ζ := by
ext n
simp
/-- `σ k n` is the sum of the `k`th powers of the divisors of `n` -/
def sigma (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.sigma] notation "σ" => ArithmeticFunction.sigma
theorem sigma_apply {k n : ℕ} : σ k n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d ^ k :=
rfl
theorem sigma_apply_prime_pow {k p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
σ k (p ^ i) = ∑ j ∈ .range (i + 1), p ^ (j * k) := by
simp [sigma_apply, divisors_prime_pow hp, Nat.pow_mul]
theorem sigma_one_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 1 n = ∑ d ∈ divisors n, d := by simp [sigma_apply]
theorem sigma_one_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
σ 1 (p ^ i) = ∑ k ∈ .range (i + 1), p ^ k := by
simp [sigma_apply_prime_pow hp]
theorem sigma_zero_apply (n : ℕ) : σ 0 n = #n.divisors := by simp [sigma_apply]
theorem sigma_zero_apply_prime_pow {p i : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : σ 0 (p ^ i) = i + 1 := by
simp [sigma_apply_prime_pow hp]
theorem zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma {k : ℕ} : ζ * pow k = σ k := by
ext
rw [sigma, zeta_mul_apply]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
rw [pow_apply, if_neg (not_and_of_not_right _ _)]
contrapose! hx
simp [hx]
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_one [MonoidWithZero R] : IsMultiplicative (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2
⟨by simp, by
intro m n hm _hn hmn
rcases eq_or_ne m 1 with (rfl | hm')
· simp
rw [one_apply_ne, one_apply_ne hm', zero_mul]
rw [Ne, mul_eq_one, not_and_or]
exact Or.inl hm'⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_zeta : IsMultiplicative ζ :=
IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero.2 ⟨by simp, by simp +contextual⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_id : IsMultiplicative ArithmeticFunction.id :=
⟨rfl, fun {_ _} _ => rfl⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem IsMultiplicative.ppow [CommSemiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
{k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (f.ppow k) := by
induction k with
| zero => exact isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
| succ k hi => rw [ppow_succ']; apply hf.pmul hi
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_pow {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (pow k) :=
isMultiplicative_id.ppow
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_sigma {k : ℕ} : IsMultiplicative (σ k) := by
rw [← zeta_mul_pow_eq_sigma]
apply isMultiplicative_zeta.mul isMultiplicative_pow
/-- `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.primeFactorsList.length, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Omega] notation "Ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardFactors
theorem cardFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : Ω n = n.primeFactorsList.length :=
rfl
lemma cardFactors_zero : Ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] theorem cardFactors_one : Ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardFactors_apply]
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime {n : ℕ} : Ω n = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => List.length_eq_one_iff.2 ⟨n, primeFactorsList_prime h⟩⟩
cases n with | zero => simp at h | succ n =>
rcases List.length_eq_one_iff.1 h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← prod_primeFactorsList n.add_one_ne_zero, hx, List.prod_singleton]
apply prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
rw [hx, List.mem_singleton]
theorem cardFactors_mul {m n : ℕ} (m0 : m ≠ 0) (n0 : n ≠ 0) : Ω (m * n) = Ω m + Ω n := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, cardFactors_apply, ← Multiset.coe_card, ← factors_eq,
UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors_mul m0 n0, factors_eq, factors_eq,
Multiset.card_add, Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_card]
theorem cardFactors_multiset_prod {s : Multiset ℕ} (h0 : s.prod ≠ 0) :
Ω s.prod = (Multiset.map Ω s).sum := by
induction s using Multiset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| cons ih => simp_all [cardFactors_mul, not_or]
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω p = 1 :=
cardFactors_eq_one_iff_prime.2 hp
@[simp]
theorem cardFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Ω (p ^ k) = k := by
rw [cardFactors_apply, hp.primeFactorsList_pow, List.length_replicate]
/-- `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`. -/
def cardDistinctFactors : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun n => n.primeFactorsList.dedup.length, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.omega] notation "ω" => ArithmeticFunction.cardDistinctFactors
theorem cardDistinctFactors_zero : ω 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_one : ω 1 = 0 := by simp [cardDistinctFactors]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply {n : ℕ} : ω n = n.primeFactorsList.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem cardDistinctFactors_eq_cardFactors_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) :
ω n = Ω n ↔ Squarefree n := by
rw [squarefree_iff_nodup_primeFactorsList h0, cardDistinctFactors_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← n.primeFactorsList.dedup_sublist.eq_of_length h]
apply List.nodup_dedup
· simp [h.dedup, cardFactors]
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
ω (p ^ k) = 1 := by
rw [cardDistinctFactors_apply, hp.primeFactorsList_pow, List.replicate_dedup hk,
List.length_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : ω p = 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, cardDistinctFactors_apply_prime_pow hp one_ne_zero]
/-- `μ` is the Möbius function. If `n` is squarefree with an even number of distinct prime factors,
`μ n = 1`. If `n` is squarefree with an odd number of distinct prime factors, `μ n = -1`.
If `n` is not squarefree, `μ n = 0`. -/
def moebius : ArithmeticFunction ℤ :=
⟨fun n => if Squarefree n then (-1) ^ cardFactors n else 0, by simp⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.Moebius] notation "μ" => ArithmeticFunction.moebius
@[simp]
theorem moebius_apply_of_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : Squarefree n) : μ n = (-1) ^ cardFactors n :=
if_pos h
@[simp]
theorem moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree {n : ℕ} (h : ¬Squarefree n) : μ n = 0 :=
if_neg h
theorem moebius_apply_one : μ 1 = 1 := by simp
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_squarefree {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ Squarefree n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· simp [h, pow_ne_zero]
theorem moebius_eq_or (n : ℕ) : μ n = 0 ∨ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
simp only [moebius, coe_mk]
split_ifs
· right
exact neg_one_pow_eq_or ..
· left
rfl
theorem moebius_ne_zero_iff_eq_or {n : ℕ} : μ n ≠ 0 ↔ μ n = 1 ∨ μ n = -1 := by
have := moebius_eq_or n
aesop
theorem moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : μ l ^ 2 = 1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, neg_one_sq, one_pow]
theorem abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree {l : ℕ} (hl : Squarefree l) : |μ l| = 1 := by
simp only [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hl, abs_pow, abs_neg, abs_one, one_pow]
theorem moebius_sq {n : ℕ} :
μ n ^ 2 = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact moebius_sq_eq_one_of_squarefree h
· simp only [pow_eq_zero_iff, moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h,
zero_pow (show 2 ≠ 0 by norm_num)]
theorem abs_moebius {n : ℕ} :
|μ n| = if Squarefree n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact abs_moebius_eq_one_of_squarefree h
· simp only [moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree h, abs_zero]
theorem abs_moebius_le_one {n : ℕ} : |μ n| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_moebius, apply_ite (· ≤ 1)]
simp
theorem moebius_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : μ p = -1 := by
rw [moebius_apply_of_squarefree hp.squarefree, cardFactors_apply_prime hp, pow_one]
theorem moebius_apply_prime_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
μ (p ^ k) = if k = 1 then -1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_one, moebius_apply_prime hp]
rw [moebius_eq_zero_of_not_squarefree]
rw [squarefree_pow_iff hp.ne_one hk, not_and_or]
exact Or.inr h
theorem moebius_apply_isPrimePow_not_prime {n : ℕ} (hn : IsPrimePow n) (hn' : ¬n.Prime) :
μ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩ := (isPrimePow_nat_iff _).1 hn
rw [moebius_apply_prime_pow hp hk.ne', if_neg]
rintro rfl
exact hn' (by simpa)
@[arith_mult]
theorem isMultiplicative_moebius : IsMultiplicative μ := by
rw [IsMultiplicative.iff_ne_zero]
refine ⟨by simp, fun {n m} hn hm hnm => ?_⟩
simp only [moebius, ZeroHom.coe_mk, coe_mk, ZeroHom.toFun_eq_coe, Eq.ndrec, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
IsUnit.mul_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff, squarefree_mul hnm, ite_zero_mul_ite_zero,
cardFactors_mul hn hm, pow_add]
theorem IsMultiplicative.prodPrimeFactors_one_add_of_squarefree [CommSemiring R]
{f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h_mult : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 + f p) = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, f d := by
trans (∏ᵖ p ∣ n, ((ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) + f) p)
· simp_rw [prodPrimeFactors_apply hn.ne_zero, add_apply, natCoe_apply]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl; intro p hp
rw [zeta_apply_ne (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| List.mem_toFinset.mp hp).ne_zero, cast_one]
rw [isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast.prodPrimeFactors_add_of_squarefree h_mult hn,
coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem IsMultiplicative.prodPrimeFactors_one_sub_of_squarefree [CommRing R]
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {n : ℕ} (hn : Squarefree n) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 - f p) = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, μ d * f d := by
trans (∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, (1 + (ArithmeticFunction.pmul (μ : ArithmeticFunction R) f) p))
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl; intro p hp
rw [pmul_apply, intCoe_apply, ArithmeticFunction.moebius_apply_prime
(prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList (List.mem_toFinset.mp hp))]
ring
· rw [(isMultiplicative_moebius.intCast.pmul hf).prodPrimeFactors_one_add_of_squarefree hn]
simp_rw [pmul_apply, intCoe_apply]
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
@[simp]
theorem moebius_mul_coe_zeta : (μ * ζ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) = 1 := by
ext n
refine recOnPosPrimePosCoprime ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ n
· intro p n hp hn
rw [coe_mul_zeta_apply, sum_divisors_prime_pow hp, sum_range_succ']
simp_rw [Nat.pow_zero, moebius_apply_one,
moebius_apply_prime_pow hp (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Nat.succ_inj, sum_ite_eq', mem_range,
if_pos hn, neg_add_cancel]
rw [one_apply_ne]
rw [Ne, pow_eq_one_iff]
· exact hp.ne_one
· exact hn.ne'
· rw [ZeroHom.map_zero, ZeroHom.map_zero]
· simp
· intro a b _ha _hb hab ha' hb'
rw [IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime _ hab, ha', hb',
IsMultiplicative.map_mul_of_coprime isMultiplicative_one hab]
exact isMultiplicative_moebius.mul isMultiplicative_zeta.natCast
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_moebius : (ζ * μ : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, moebius_mul_coe_zeta]
@[simp]
theorem coe_moebius_mul_coe_zeta [Ring R] : (μ * ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
rw [← coe_coe, ← intCoe_mul, moebius_mul_coe_zeta, intCoe_one]
@[simp]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_coe_moebius [Ring R] : (ζ * μ : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
rw [← coe_coe, ← intCoe_mul, coe_zeta_mul_moebius, intCoe_one]
section CommRing
| variable [CommRing R]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 1,096 | 1,097 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
/-!
# The category of open sets in a topological space.
We define `toTopCat : Opens X ⥤ TopCat` and
`map (f : X ⟶ Y) : Opens Y ⥤ Opens X`, given by taking preimages of open sets.
Unfortunately `Opens` isn't (usefully) a functor `TopCat ⥤ Cat`.
(One can in fact define such a functor,
but using it results in unresolvable `Eq.rec` terms in goals.)
Really it's a 2-functor from (spaces, continuous functions, equalities)
to (categories, functors, natural isomorphisms).
We don't attempt to set up the full theory here, but do provide the natural isomorphisms
`mapId : map (𝟙 X) ≅ 𝟭 (Opens X)` and
`mapComp : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map g ⋙ map f`.
Beyond that, there's a collection of simp lemmas for working with these constructions.
-/
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Opposite Topology
universe u
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} {U V W : Opens X}
/-!
Since `Opens X` has a partial order, it automatically receives a `Category` instance.
Unfortunately, because we do not allow morphisms in `Prop`,
the morphisms `U ⟶ V` are not just proofs `U ≤ V`, but rather
`ULift (PLift (U ≤ V))`.
-/
instance opensHom.instFunLike : FunLike (U ⟶ V) U V where
coe f := Set.inclusion f.le
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟨_⟩⟩ _ _; congr!
lemma apply_def (f : U ⟶ V) (x : U) : f x = ⟨x, f.le x.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma apply_mk (f : U ⟶ V) (x : X) (hx) : f ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, f.le hx⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_apply (f : U ⟶ V) (x : U) : (f x : X) = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id (f : U ⟶ U) : ⇑f = id := rfl
lemma id_apply (f : U ⟶ U) (x : U) : f x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : U ⟶ V) (g : V ⟶ W) (x : U) : (f ≫ g) x = g (f x) := rfl
/-!
We now construct as morphisms various inclusions of open sets.
-/
-- This is tedious, but necessary because we decided not to allow Prop as morphisms in a category...
/-- The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def infLELeft (U V : Opens X) : U ⊓ V ⟶ U :=
inf_le_left.hom
/-- The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ V` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def infLERight (U V : Opens X) : U ⊓ V ⟶ V :=
inf_le_right.hom
/-- The inclusion `U i ⟶ iSup U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leSupr {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens X) (i : ι) : U i ⟶ iSup U :=
(le_iSup U i).hom
/-- The inclusion `⊥ ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def botLE (U : Opens X) : ⊥ ⟶ U :=
bot_le.hom
/-- The inclusion `U ⟶ ⊤` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leTop (U : Opens X) : U ⟶ ⊤ :=
le_top.hom
-- We do not mark this as a simp lemma because it breaks open `x`.
-- Nevertheless, it is useful in `SheafOfFunctions`.
theorem infLELeft_apply (U V : Opens X) (x) :
(infLELeft U V) x = ⟨x.1, (@inf_le_left _ _ U V : _ ≤ _) x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem infLELeft_apply_mk (U V : Opens X) (x) (m) :
(infLELeft U V) ⟨x, m⟩ = ⟨x, (@inf_le_left _ _ U V : _ ≤ _) m⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leSupr_apply_mk {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens X) (i : ι) (x) (m) :
(leSupr U i) ⟨x, m⟩ = ⟨x, (le_iSup U i :) m⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The functor from open sets in `X` to `TopCat`,
realising each open set as a topological space itself.
-/
def toTopCat (X : TopCat.{u}) : Opens X ⥤ TopCat where
obj U := TopCat.of U
map i := TopCat.ofHom ⟨fun x ↦ ⟨x.1, i.le x.2⟩,
IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.continuous_iff.2 continuous_induced_dom⟩
@[simp]
theorem toTopCat_map (X : TopCat.{u}) {U V : Opens X} {f : U ⟶ V} {x} {h} :
((toTopCat X).map f) ⟨x, h⟩ = ⟨x, f.le h⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The inclusion map from an open subset to the whole space, as a morphism in `TopCat`.
-/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def inclusion' {X : TopCat.{u}} (U : Opens X) : (toTopCat X).obj U ⟶ X :=
TopCat.ofHom
{ toFun := _
continuous_toFun := continuous_subtype_val }
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion' {X : TopCat} {U : Opens X} :
(inclusion' U : U → X) = Subtype.val := rfl
theorem isOpenEmbedding {X : TopCat.{u}} (U : Opens X) : IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion' U) :=
U.2.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal
/-- The inclusion of the top open subset (i.e. the whole space) is an isomorphism.
-/
def inclusionTopIso (X : TopCat.{u}) : (toTopCat X).obj ⊤ ≅ X where
hom := inclusion' ⊤
inv := TopCat.ofHom ⟨fun x => ⟨x, trivial⟩, continuous_def.2 fun _ ⟨_, hS, hSU⟩ => hSU ▸ hS⟩
/-- `Opens.map f` gives the functor from open sets in Y to open set in X,
given by taking preimages under f. -/
def map (f : X ⟶ Y) : Opens Y ⥤ Opens X where
obj U := ⟨f ⁻¹' (U : Set Y), U.isOpen.preimage f.hom.continuous⟩
map i := ⟨⟨fun _ h => i.le h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) : ((map f).obj U : Set X) = f ⁻¹' (U : Set Y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (U) (p) : (map f).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = ⟨f ⁻¹' U, p.preimage f.hom.continuous⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_homOfLE (f : X ⟶ Y) {U V : Opens Y} (e : U ≤ V) :
(TopologicalSpace.Opens.map f).map (homOfLE e) =
homOfLE (show (Opens.map f).obj U ≤ (Opens.map f).obj V from fun _ hx ↦ e hx) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id_obj (U : Opens X) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj U = U :=
let ⟨_, _⟩ := U
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id_obj' (U) (p) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = ⟨U, p⟩ :=
rfl
theorem map_id_obj_unop (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj (unop U) = unop U := by
simp
theorem op_map_id_obj (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X)).op.obj U = U := by simp
@[simp]
lemma map_top (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Opens.map f).obj ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
/-- The inclusion `U ⟶ (map f).obj ⊤` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leMapTop (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens X) : U ⟶ (map f).obj ⊤ :=
leTop U
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(map (f ≫ g)).obj U = (map f).obj ((map g).obj U) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_obj' (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) (p) :
(map (f ≫ g)).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = (map f).obj ((map g).obj ⟨U, p⟩) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) {U V} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(map (f ≫ g)).map i = (map f).map ((map g).map i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_obj_unop (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(map (f ≫ g)).obj (unop U) = (map f).obj ((map g).obj (unop U)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_map_comp_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(map (f ≫ g)).op.obj U = (map f).op.obj ((map g).op.obj U) :=
rfl
theorem map_iSup (f : X ⟶ Y) {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens Y) :
(map f).obj (iSup U) = iSup ((map f).obj ∘ U) := by
ext1; rw [iSup_def, iSup_def, map_obj]
dsimp; rw [Set.preimage_iUnion]
section
variable (X)
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens X` given by taking preimages under the identity function
is naturally isomorphic to the identity functor.
-/
@[simps]
def mapId : map (𝟙 X) ≅ 𝟭 (Opens X) where
hom := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_id_obj U) }
inv := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_id_obj U).symm }
theorem map_id_eq : map (𝟙 X) = 𝟭 (Opens X) := by
rfl
end
/-- The natural isomorphism between taking preimages under `f ≫ g`, and the composite
of taking preimages under `g`, then preimages under `f`.
-/
@[simps]
def mapComp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map g ⋙ map f where
hom := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_comp_obj f g U) }
inv := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_comp_obj f g U).symm }
theorem map_comp_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : map (f ≫ g) = map g ⋙ map f :=
rfl
-- We could make `f g` implicit here, but it's nice to be able to see when
-- they are the identity (often!)
/-- If two continuous maps `f g : X ⟶ Y` are equal,
then the functors `Opens Y ⥤ Opens X` they induce are isomorphic.
-/
def mapIso (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) : map f ≅ map g :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun U => eqToIso (by rw [congr_arg map h])
theorem map_eq (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) : map f = map g := by
subst h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapIso_refl (f : X ⟶ Y) (h) : mapIso f f h = Iso.refl (map _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapIso_hom_app (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) (U : Opens Y) :
(mapIso f g h).hom.app U = eqToHom (by rw [h]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapIso_inv_app (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) (U : Opens Y) :
(mapIso f g h).inv.app U = eqToHom (by rw [h]) :=
rfl
/-- A homeomorphism of spaces gives an equivalence of categories of open sets.
TODO: define `OrderIso.equivalence`, use it.
-/
@[simps]
def mapMapIso {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (H : X ≅ Y) : Opens Y ≌ Opens X where
functor := map H.hom
inverse := map H.inv
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun U => eqToIso (by simp [map, Set.preimage_preimage])
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun U => eqToIso (by simp [map, Set.preimage_preimage])
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
/-- An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y`.
-/
@[simps obj_coe]
def IsOpenMap.functor {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y where
obj U := ⟨f '' (U : Set X), hf (U : Set X) U.2⟩
map h := ⟨⟨Set.image_subset _ h.down.down⟩⟩
/-- An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an adjunction between `Opens X` and `Opens Y`.
-/
def IsOpenMap.adjunction {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
hf.functor ⊣ Opens.map f where
unit := { app := fun _ => homOfLE fun x hxU => ⟨x, hxU, rfl⟩ }
counit := { app := fun _ => homOfLE fun _ ⟨_, hfxV, hxy⟩ => hxy ▸ hfxV }
instance IsOpenMap.functorFullOfMono {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) [H : Mono f] :
hf.functor.Full where
map_surjective i :=
⟨homOfLE fun x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := i.le ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (TopCat.mono_iff_injective f).mp H eq ▸ hy, rfl⟩
instance IsOpenMap.functor_faithful {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
hf.functor.Faithful where
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.functor_obj_injective {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : Function.Injective hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj :=
fun _ _ e ↦ Opens.ext (Set.image_injective.mpr hf.injective (congr_arg (↑· : Opens Y → Set Y) e))
namespace Topology.IsInducing
/-- Given an inducing map `X ⟶ Y` and some `U : Opens X`, this is the union of all open sets
whose preimage is `U`. This is right adjoint to `Opens.map`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def functorObj {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (_ : IsInducing f) (U : Opens X) : Opens Y :=
sSup { s : Opens Y | (Opens.map f).obj s = U }
lemma map_functorObj {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f)
(U : Opens X) :
(Opens.map f).obj (hf.functorObj U) = U := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro x ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, _, ⟨rfl : _ = U, rfl⟩, hx : f x ∈ s⟩; exact hx
· intros x hx
obtain ⟨U, hU⟩ := U
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := hf.isOpen_iff.mp hU
exact Opens.mem_sSup.mpr ⟨⟨_, ht⟩, rfl, hx⟩
lemma mem_functorObj_iff {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) (U : Opens X)
{x : X} : f x ∈ hf.functorObj U ↔ x ∈ U := by
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.map_functorObj U]
rfl
lemma le_functorObj_iff {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) {U : Opens X}
{V : Opens Y} : V ≤ hf.functorObj U ↔ (Opens.map f).obj V ≤ U := by
obtain ⟨U, hU⟩ := U
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := hf.isOpen_iff.mp hU
constructor
· exact fun i x hx ↦ (hf.mem_functorObj_iff ((Opens.map f).obj ⟨t, ht⟩)).mp (i hx)
· intros h x hx
refine Opens.mem_sSup.mpr ⟨⟨_, V.2.union ht⟩, Opens.ext ?_, Set.mem_union_left t hx⟩
dsimp
rwa [Set.union_eq_right]
/-- An inducing map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a Galois insertion between `Opens Y` and `Opens X`. -/
def opensGI {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
GaloisInsertion (Opens.map f).obj hf.functorObj :=
⟨_, fun _ _ ↦ hf.le_functorObj_iff.symm, fun U ↦ (hf.map_functorObj U).ge, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
/-- An inducing map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y`. -/
@[simps]
def functor {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
Opens X ⥤ Opens Y where
obj := hf.functorObj
map {U V} h := homOfLE (hf.le_functorObj_iff.mpr ((hf.map_functorObj U).trans_le h.le))
/-- An inducing map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an adjunction between `Opens Y` and `Opens X`. -/
def adjunction {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
Opens.map f ⊣ hf.functor :=
hf.opensGI.gc.adjunction
end Topology.IsInducing
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
@[simp]
theorem isOpenEmbedding_obj_top {X : TopCat} (U : Opens X) :
U.isOpenEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ⊤ = U := by
ext1
exact Set.image_univ.trans Subtype.range_coe
@[simp]
| theorem inclusion'_map_eq_top {X : TopCat} (U : Opens X) : (Opens.map U.inclusion').obj U = ⊤ := by
ext1
exact Subtype.coe_preimage_self _
@[simp]
theorem adjunction_counit_app_self {X : TopCat} (U : Opens X) :
U.isOpenEmbedding.isOpenMap.adjunction.counit.app U = eqToHom (by simp) := Subsingleton.elim _ _
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Opens.lean | 374 | 381 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
/-!
# Cardinality of a finite set
This defines the cardinality of a `Finset` and provides induction principles for finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.card`: `#s : ℕ` returns the cardinality of `s : Finset α`.
### Induction principles
* `Finset.strongInduction`: Strong induction
* `Finset.strongInductionOn`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInduction`
* `Finset.strongDownwardInductionOn`
* `Finset.case_strong_induction_on`
* `Finset.Nonempty.strong_induction`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s.card` is the number of elements of `s`, aka its cardinality.
The notation `#s` can be accessed in the `Finset` locale. -/
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
@[inherit_doc] scoped prefix:arg "#" => Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : #s = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = #s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : #(⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α) = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : #(∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → #s ≤ #t :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := Multiset.card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : #s ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
@[simp] lemma card_pos : 0 < #s ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma one_le_card : 1 ≤ #s ↔ s.Nonempty := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #s ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : #{a} = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : #({a} ∩ s) ≤ 1 := by
obtain h | h := Finset.decidableMem a s
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : #(s.cons a h) = #s + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : #(insert a s) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : #(insert a s) = #s := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : #(insert a s) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : #{a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : #{a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : #{a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : #{a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : #{a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_insert_of_mem` and `Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem`.
-/
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : #(insert a s) = if a ∈ s then #s else #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : #{a, b} = 1 ∨ #{a, b} = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : #{a, b} = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
/-- $\#(s \setminus \{a\}) = \#s - 1$ if $a \in s$. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) = #s - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) + 1 = #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → #(s.erase a) < #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : #(s.erase a) ≤ #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : #s - 1 ≤ #(s.erase a) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
/-- If `a ∈ s` is known, see also `Finset.card_erase_of_mem` and `Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem`. -/
theorem card_erase_eq_ite : #(s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then #s - 1 else #s :=
Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end InsertErase
@[simp]
theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : #(range n) = n :=
Multiset.card_range n
@[simp]
theorem card_attach : #s.attach = #s :=
Multiset.card_attach
end Finset
open scoped Finset
section ToMLListultiset
variable [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (l : List α)
theorem Multiset.card_toFinset : #m.toFinset = Multiset.card m.dedup :=
rfl
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_le : #m.toFinset ≤ Multiset.card m :=
card_le_card <| dedup_le _
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup {m : Multiset α} (h : m.Nodup) :
#m.toFinset = Multiset.card m :=
congr_arg card <| Multiset.dedup_eq_self.mpr h
theorem Multiset.dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
card m.dedup = card m ↔ m.Nodup :=
.trans ⟨fun h ↦ eq_of_le_of_card_le (dedup_le m) h.ge, congr_arg _⟩ dedup_eq_self
theorem Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_card_iff_nodup {m : Multiset α} :
#m.toFinset = card m ↔ m.Nodup := dedup_card_eq_card_iff_nodup
theorem List.card_toFinset : #l.toFinset = l.dedup.length :=
rfl
theorem List.toFinset_card_le : #l.toFinset ≤ l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_le ⟦l⟧
theorem List.toFinset_card_of_nodup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : #l.toFinset = l.length :=
Multiset.toFinset_card_of_nodup h
end ToMLListultiset
namespace Finset
variable {s t u : Finset α} {f : α → β} {n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Finset α) : s.toList.length = #s := by
rw [toList, ← Multiset.coe_card, Multiset.coe_toList, card_def]
theorem card_image_le [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := by
simpa only [card_map] using (s.1.map f).toFinset_card_le
theorem card_image_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] (H : Set.InjOn f s) : #(s.image f) = #s := by
simp only [card, image_val_of_injOn H, card_map]
theorem injOn_of_card_image_eq [DecidableEq β] (H : #(s.image f) = #s) : Set.InjOn f s := by
rw [card_def, card_def, image, toFinset] at H
dsimp only at H
have : (s.1.map f).dedup = s.1.map f := by
refine Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (Multiset.dedup_le _) ?_
simp only [H, Multiset.card_map, le_rfl]
rw [Multiset.dedup_eq_self] at this
exact inj_on_of_nodup_map this
theorem card_image_iff [DecidableEq β] : #(s.image f) = #s ↔ Set.InjOn f s :=
⟨injOn_of_card_image_eq, card_image_of_injOn⟩
theorem card_image_of_injective [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (H : Injective f) :
#(s.image f) = #s :=
card_image_of_injOn fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem fiber_card_ne_zero_iff_mem_image (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) [DecidableEq β] (y : β) :
#(s.filter fun x ↦ f x = y) ≠ 0 ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos, fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image]
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Finset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
#(s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ⊆ s, n < #s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a :=
(s.1.card_filter_le_iff P n).trans ⟨fun H s' hs' h ↦ H s'.1 (by aesop) h,
fun H s' hs' h ↦ H ⟨s', nodup_of_le hs' s.2⟩ (fun _ hx ↦ Multiset.subset_of_le hs' hx) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α ↪ β) : #(s.map f) = #s :=
Multiset.card_map _ _
@[simp]
theorem card_subtype (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
#(s.subtype p) = #(s.filter p) := by simp [Finset.subtype]
theorem card_filter_le (s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) ≤ #s :=
card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _
theorem eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : #t ≤ #s) : s = t :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le (val_le_iff.mpr h) h₂
theorem eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ s = t :=
⟨eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst, (ge_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ·)⟩
theorem eq_of_superset_of_card_ge (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : #t ≤ #s) : t = s :=
(eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst hts).symm
theorem eq_iff_card_ge_of_superset (hst : s ⊆ t) : #t ≤ #s ↔ t = s :=
(eq_iff_card_le_of_subset hst).trans eq_comm
theorem subset_iff_eq_of_card_le (h : #t ≤ #s) : s ⊆ t ↔ s = t :=
⟨fun hst => eq_of_subset_of_card_le hst h, Eq.subset'⟩
theorem map_eq_of_subset {f : α ↪ α} (hs : s.map f ⊆ s) : s.map f = s :=
eq_of_subset_of_card_le hs (card_map _).ge
theorem card_filter_eq_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = #s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
rw [(card_filter_le s p).eq_iff_not_lt, not_lt, eq_iff_card_le_of_subset (filter_subset p s),
filter_eq_self]
alias ⟨filter_card_eq, _⟩ := card_filter_eq_iff
theorem card_filter_eq_zero_iff {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
#(s.filter p) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬ p x := by
rw [card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
nonrec lemma card_lt_card (h : s ⊂ t) : #s < #t := card_lt_card <| val_lt_iff.2 h
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Finset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem card_eq_of_bijective (f : ∀ i, i < n → α) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ i, ∃ h : i < n, f i h = a)
(hf' : ∀ i (h : i < n), f i h ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i j (hi : i < n) (hj : j < n), f i hi = f j hj → i = j) : #s = n := by
classical
have : s = (range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2) := by
ext a
suffices _ : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ (i : _) (hi : i ∈ range n), f i (mem_range.1 hi) = a by
simpa only [mem_image, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists]
constructor
· intro ha; obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hf a ha; use i, mem_range.2 hi
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩; apply hf'
calc
#s = #((range n).attach.image fun i => f i.1 (mem_range.1 i.2)) := by rw [this]
_ = #(range n).attach := ?_
_ = #(range n) := card_attach
_ = n := card_range n
apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ eq
exact Subtype.eq <| f_inj i j (mem_range.1 hi) (mem_range.1 hj) eq
section bij
variable {t : Finset β}
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
lemma card_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) : #s = #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #s.attach := card_attach.symm
_ = #(s.attach.image fun a ↦ i a.1 a.2) := Eq.symm ?_
_ = #t := ?_
· apply card_image_of_injective
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
simpa using i_inj _ _ _ _ h
· congr 1
ext b
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 h; apply hi
· obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := i_surj b h; exact mem_image.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, by simp⟩
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
lemma card_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, α) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) : #s = #t := by
refine card_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩)
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain. -/
lemma card_nbij (i : α → β) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set α).SurjOn i t) : #s = #t :=
card_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj)
/-- Reorder a finset.
The difference with `Finset.card_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.card_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains.
The difference with `Finset.card_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains,
rather than on the entire types. -/
lemma card_nbij' (i : α → β) (j : β → α) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a) : #s = #t :=
card_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_equiv (e : α ≃ β) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) : #s = #t := by
refine card_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp [hst]
/-- Specialization of `Finset.card_nbij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.card_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
lemma card_bijective (e : α → β) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) :
#s = #t := card_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst
lemma card_le_card_of_injOn (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (f_inj : (s : Set α).InjOn f) :
#s ≤ #t := by
classical
calc
#s = #(s.image f) := (card_image_of_injOn f_inj).symm
_ ≤ #t := card_le_card <| image_subset_iff.2 hf
lemma card_le_card_of_injective {f : s → t} (hf : f.Injective) : #s ≤ #t := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩
· simp
· classical
let f' : α → β := fun a => f (if ha : a ∈ s then ⟨a, ha⟩ else ⟨a₀, ha₀⟩)
apply card_le_card_of_injOn f'
· aesop
· intro a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂ haa
rw [mem_coe] at ha₁ ha₂
simp only [f', ha₁, ha₂, ← Subtype.ext_iff] at haa
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (hf haa)
lemma card_le_card_of_surjOn (f : α → β) (hf : Set.SurjOn f s t) : #t ≤ #s := by
classical unfold Set.SurjOn at hf; exact (card_le_card (mod_cast hf)).trans card_image_le
/-- If there are more pigeons than pigeonholes, then there are two pigeons in the same pigeonhole.
-/
theorem exists_ne_map_eq_of_card_lt_of_maps_to {t : Finset β} (hc : #t < #s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) : ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ f x = f y := by
classical
by_contra! hz
refine hc.not_le (card_le_card_of_injOn f hf ?_)
intro x hx y hy
contrapose
exact hz x hx y hy
lemma le_card_of_inj_on_range (f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀ i < n, f i ∈ s)
(f_inj : ∀ i < n, ∀ j < n, f i = f j → i = j) : n ≤ #s :=
calc
n = #(range n) := (card_range n).symm
_ ≤ #s := card_le_card_of_injOn f (by simpa only [mem_range]) (by simpa)
lemma surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hinj : Set.InjOn f s)
(hst : #t ≤ #s) : Set.SurjOn f s t := by
classical
suffices s.image f = t by simp [← this, Set.SurjOn]
have : s.image f ⊆ t := by aesop (add simp Finset.subset_iff)
exact eq_of_subset_of_card_le this (hst.trans_eq (card_image_of_injOn hinj).symm)
lemma surj_on_of_inj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hinj : ∀ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (hst : #t ≤ #s) :
∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, b = f a ha := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hinj' : Set.InjOn f' s.attach := fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ Subtype.ext (hinj _ _ x.2 y.2 hxy)
have hmapsto' : Set.MapsTo f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ hf _ _
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := surjOn_of_injOn_of_card_le _ hmapsto' hinj' (by rwa [card_attach]) hb
exact ⟨a, a.2, rfl⟩
lemma injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le (f : α → β) (hf : Set.MapsTo f s t) (hsurj : Set.SurjOn f s t)
(hst : #s ≤ #t) : Set.InjOn f s := by
classical
have : s.image f = t := Finset.coe_injective <| by simp [hsurj.image_eq_of_mapsTo hf]
have : #(s.image f) = #t := by rw [this]
have : #(s.image f) ≤ #s := card_image_le
rw [← card_image_iff]
omega
theorem inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β) (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha ∈ t)
(hsurj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, f a ha = b) (hst : #s ≤ #t) ⦃a₁⦄ (ha₁ : a₁ ∈ s) ⦃a₂⦄
(ha₂ : a₂ ∈ s) (ha₁a₂ : f a₁ ha₁ = f a₂ ha₂) : a₁ = a₂ := by
let f' : s → β := fun a ↦ f a a.2
have hsurj' : Set.SurjOn f' s.attach t := fun x hx ↦ by simpa [f'] using hsurj x hx
have hinj' := injOn_of_surjOn_of_card_le f' (fun x hx ↦ hf _ _) hsurj' (by simpa)
exact congrArg Subtype.val (@hinj' ⟨a₁, ha₁⟩ (by simp) ⟨a₂, ha₂⟩ (by simp) ha₁a₂)
end bij
@[simp]
theorem card_disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h) : #(s.disjUnion t h) = #s + #t :=
Multiset.card_add _ _
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem card_union_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∪ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t :=
Finset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a r har h => by by_cases a ∈ s <;>
simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm _ 1]
theorem card_inter_add_card_union (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t := by rw [Nat.add_comm, card_union_add_card_inter]
lemma card_union (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∩ t) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
lemma card_inter (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∩ t) = #s + #t - #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_inter_add_card_union, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem card_union_le (s t : Finset α) : #(s ∪ t) ≤ #s + #t :=
card_union_add_card_inter s t ▸ Nat.le_add_right _ _
lemma card_union_eq_card_add_card : #(s ∪ t) = #s + #t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter]; simp [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, card_union_of_disjoint⟩ := card_union_eq_card_add_card
theorem card_sdiff (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) = #t - #s := by
suffices #(t \ s) = #(t \ s ∪ s) - #s by rwa [sdiff_union_of_subset h] at this
rw [card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem card_sdiff_add_card_eq_card {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #(t \ s) + #s = #t :=
((Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (card_le_card h)).mp (card_sdiff h).symm).symm
theorem le_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) : #t - #s ≤ #(t \ s) :=
calc
#t - #s ≤ #t - #(s ∩ t) :=
Nat.sub_le_sub_left (card_le_card inter_subset_left) _
_ = #(t \ (s ∩ t)) := (card_sdiff inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ #(t \ s) := by rw [sdiff_inter_self_right t s]
theorem card_le_card_sdiff_add_card : #s ≤ #(s \ t) + #t :=
Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.1 <| le_card_sdiff _ _
theorem card_sdiff_add_card (s t : Finset α) : #(s \ t) + #t = #(s ∪ t) := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
lemma card_sdiff_comm (h : #s = #t) : #(s \ t) = #(t \ s) :=
Nat.add_right_cancel (m := #t) <| by
simp_rw [card_sdiff_add_card, ← h, card_sdiff_add_card, union_comm]
theorem sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : (t \ s).Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
exact fun h' ↦ h.not_le (card_le_card h')
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem exists_mem_not_mem_of_card_lt_card (h : #s < #t) : ∃ e, e ∈ t ∧ e ∉ s := by
classical simpa [Finset.Nonempty] using sdiff_nonempty_of_card_lt_card h
@[simp]
lemma card_sdiff_add_card_inter (s t : Finset α) :
#(s \ t) + #(s ∩ t) = #s := by
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter]
@[simp]
lemma card_inter_add_card_sdiff (s t : Finset α) :
#(s ∩ t) + #(s \ t) = #s := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, card_sdiff_add_card_inter]
/-- **Pigeonhole principle** for two finsets inside an ambient finset. -/
theorem inter_nonempty_of_card_lt_card_add_card (hts : t ⊆ s) (hus : u ⊆ s)
(hstu : #s < #t + #u) : (t ∩ u).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hstu
calc
_ = #(t ∪ u) := by simp [← card_union_add_card_inter, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.1 hstu]
_ ≤ #s := by gcongr; exact union_subset hts hus
end Lattice
theorem filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card
(p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
#(s.filter p) + #(s.filter fun a ↦ ¬ p a) = #s := by
classical
rw [← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg _ _ _), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
/-- Given a subset `s` of a set `t`, of sizes at most and at least `n` respectively, there exists a
set `u` of size `n` which is both a superset of `s` and a subset of `t`. -/
lemma exists_subsuperset_card_eq (hst : s ⊆ t) (hsn : #s ≤ n) (hnt : n ≤ #t) :
∃ u, s ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ t ∧ #u = n := by
classical
refine Nat.decreasingInduction' ?_ hnt ⟨t, by simp [hst]⟩
intro k _ hnk ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : (u \ s).Nonempty := by rw [← card_pos, card_sdiff hu₁]; omega
simp only [mem_sdiff] at ha
exact ⟨u.erase a, by simp [subset_erase, erase_subset_iff_of_mem (hu₂ _), *]⟩
/-- We can shrink a set to any smaller size. -/
lemma exists_subset_card_eq (hns : n ≤ #s) : ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = n := by
simpa using exists_subsuperset_card_eq s.empty_subset (by simp) hns
theorem le_card_iff_exists_subset_card : n ≤ #s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, hst, ht⟩ => ht ▸ card_le_card hst⟩
exact exists_subset_card_eq h
theorem exists_subset_or_subset_of_two_mul_lt_card [DecidableEq α] {X Y : Finset α} {n : ℕ}
(hXY : 2 * n < #(X ∪ Y)) : ∃ C : Finset α, n < #C ∧ (C ⊆ X ∨ C ⊆ Y) := by
have h₁ : #(X ∩ (Y \ X)) = 0 := Finset.card_eq_zero.mpr (Finset.inter_sdiff_self X Y)
have h₂ : #(X ∪ Y) = #X + #(Y \ X) := by
rw [← card_union_add_card_inter X (Y \ X), Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union, h₁, Nat.add_zero]
rw [h₂, Nat.two_mul] at hXY
obtain h | h : n < #X ∨ n < #(Y \ X) := by contrapose! hXY; omega
· exact ⟨X, h, Or.inl (Finset.Subset.refl X)⟩
· exact ⟨Y \ X, h, Or.inr sdiff_subset⟩
/-! ### Explicit description of a finset from its card -/
theorem card_eq_one : #s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} := by
cases s
simp only [Multiset.card_eq_one, Finset.card, ← val_inj, singleton_val]
theorem exists_eq_insert_iff [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} :
(∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t) ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ #s + 1 = #t := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨subset_insert _ _, (card_insert_of_not_mem ha).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨hst, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, t \ s = {a} :=
card_eq_one.1 (by rw [card_sdiff hst, ← h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
refine
| ⟨a, fun hs => (?_ : a ∉ {a}) <| mem_singleton_self _, by
rw [insert_eq, ← ha, sdiff_union_of_subset hst]⟩
rw [← ha]
exact not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right hs
theorem card_le_one : #s ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a = b := by
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 605 | 610 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol
/-!
# A `norm_num` extension for Jacobi and Legendre symbols
We extend the `norm_num` tactic so that it can be used to provably compute
the value of the Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` or the Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` when
the arguments are numerals.
## Implementation notes
We use the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol to compute the value of `J(a | b)`
efficiently, roughly comparable in effort with the euclidean algorithm for the computation
of the gcd of `a` and `b`. More precisely, the computation is done in the following steps.
* Use `J(a | 0) = 1` (an artifact of the definition) and `J(a | 1) = 1` to deal
with corner cases.
* Use `J(a | b) = J(a % b | b)` to reduce to the case that `a` is a natural number.
We define a version of the Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers for use in
the following steps; see `NormNum.jacobiSymNat`. (But we'll continue to write `J(a | b)`
in this description.)
* Remove powers of two from `b`. This is done via `J(2a | 2b) = 0` and
`J(2a+1 | 2b) = J(2a+1 | b)` (another artifact of the definition).
* Now `0 ≤ a < b` and `b` is odd. If `b = 1`, then the value is `1`.
If `a = 0` (and `b > 1`), then the value is `0`. Otherwise, we remove powers of two from `a`
via `J(4a | b) = J(a | b)` and `J(2a | b) = ±J(a | b)`, where the sign is determined
by the residue class of `b` mod 8, to reduce to `a` odd.
* Once `a` is odd, we use Quadratic Reciprocity (QR) in the form
`J(a | b) = ±J(b % a | a)`, where the sign is determined by the residue classes
of `a` and `b` mod 4. We are then back in the previous case.
We provide customized versions of these results for the various reduction steps,
where we encode the residue classes mod 2, mod 4, or mod 8 by using hypotheses like
`a % n = b`. In this way, the only divisions we have to compute and prove
are the ones occurring in the use of QR above.
-/
section Lemmas
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
/-- The Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers in both arguments. -/
def jacobiSymNat (a b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
jacobiSym a b
/-!
### API Lemmas
We repeat part of the API for `jacobiSym` with `NormNum.jacobiSymNat` and without implicit
arguments, in a form that is suitable for constructing proofs in `norm_num`.
-/
/-- Base cases: `b = 0`, `b = 1`, `a = 0`, `a = 1`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 0 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.zero_right]
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 1 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.one_right]
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_left (b : ℕ) (hb : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) : jacobiSymNat 0 b = 0 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_zero, jacobiSym.zero_left ?_]
calc
1 < 2 * 1 := by decide
_ ≤ 2 * (b / 2) :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Nat.succ_le.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb)))
_ ≤ b := Nat.mul_div_le b 2
theorem jacobiSymNat.one_left (b : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat 1 b = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, Nat.cast_one, jacobiSym.one_left]
/-- Turn a Legendre symbol into a Jacobi symbol. -/
theorem LegendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) (pp : Fact p.Prime) (a r : ℤ)
(hr : IsInt (jacobiSym a p) r) : IsInt (legendreSym p a) r := by
rwa [@jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym p pp a]
/-- The value depends only on the residue class of `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem JacobiSym.mod_left (a : ℤ) (b ab' : ℕ) (ab r b' : ℤ) (hb' : (b : ℤ) = b')
(hab : a % b' = ab) (h : (ab' : ℤ) = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab' b = r) : jacobiSym a b = r := by
rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mod_left, hb', hab, ← h]
theorem jacobiSymNat.mod_left (a b ab : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (hab : a % b = ab) (hr : jacobiSymNat ab b = r) :
jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
rw [← hr, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSymNat, _root_.jacobiSym.mod_left a b, ← hab]; rfl
/-- The symbol vanishes when both entries are even (and `b / 2 ≠ 0`). -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_even (a b : ℕ) (hb₀ : Nat.beq (b / 2) 0 = false) (ha : a % 2 = 0)
(hb₁ : b % 2 = 0) : jacobiSymNat a b = 0 := by
refine jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff.mpr
⟨ne_of_gt ((Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false hb₀)).trans_le (Nat.div_le_self b 2)),
fun hf => ?_⟩
have h : 2 ∣ a.gcd b := Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero ha) (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb₁)
change 2 ∣ (a : ℤ).gcd b at h
rw [hf, ← even_iff_two_dvd] at h
exact Nat.not_even_one h
/-- When `a` is odd and `b` is even, we can replace `b` by `b / 2`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.odd_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 0) (hc : b / 2 = c)
(hr : jacobiSymNat a c = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
have ha' : legendreSym 2 a = 1 := by
simp only [legendreSym.mod 2 a, Int.ofNat_mod_ofNat, ha]
decide
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc')
· rw [← hr, Nat.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_div_eq_zero (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hb) hc]
· haveI : NeZero c := ⟨hc'⟩
-- for `jacobiSym.mul_right`
rwa [← Nat.mod_add_div b 2, hb, hc, Nat.zero_add, jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.mul_right,
← jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym, ha', one_mul]
/-- If `a` is divisible by `4` and `b` is odd, then we can remove the factor `4` from `a`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.double_even (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 0) (hb : b % 2 = 1)
(hc : a / 4 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
exact (jacobiSym.div_four_left (mod_cast ha) hb).symm
/-- If `a` is even and `b` is odd, then we can remove a factor `2` from `a`,
but we may have to change the sign, depending on `b % 8`.
We give one version for each of the four odd residue classes mod `8`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_odd₁ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 1)
(hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_neg (by simp [hb])]
rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; norm_num
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_odd₇ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 7)
(hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_neg (by simp [hb])]
rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; norm_num
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_odd₃ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 3)
(hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = -r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_pos (by simp [hb])]
rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; norm_num
theorem jacobiSymNat.even_odd₅ (a b c : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 2 = 0) (hb : b % 8 = 5)
(hc : a / 2 = c) (hr : jacobiSymNat c b = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = -r := by
simp only [jacobiSymNat, ← hr, ← hc, Int.natCast_ediv, Nat.cast_ofNat]
rw [← jacobiSym.even_odd (mod_cast ha), if_pos (by simp [hb])]
| rw [← Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd, hb]; norm_num
/-- Use quadratic reciproity to reduce to smaller `b`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.qr₁ (a b : ℕ) (r : ℤ) (ha : a % 4 = 1) (hb : b % 2 = 1)
(hr : jacobiSymNat b a = r) : jacobiSymNat a b = r := by
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean | 151 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Beta
/-!
# Deligne's archimedean Gamma-factors
In the theory of L-series one frequently encounters the following functions (of a complex variable
`s`) introduced in Deligne's landmark paper *Valeurs de fonctions L et periodes d'integrales*:
$$ \Gamma_{\mathbb{R}}(s) = \pi ^ {-s / 2} \Gamma (s / 2) $$
and
$$ \Gamma_{\mathbb{C}}(s) = 2 (2 \pi) ^ {-s} \Gamma (s). $$
These are the factors that need to be included in the Dedekind zeta function of a number field
for each real, resp. complex, infinite place.
(Note that these are *not* the same as Mathlib's `Real.Gamma` vs. `Complex.Gamma`; Deligne's
functions both take a complex variable as input.)
This file defines these functions, and proves some elementary properties, including a reflection
formula which is an important input in functional equations of (un-completed) Dirichlet L-functions.
-/
open Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
namespace Complex
/-- Deligne's archimedean Gamma factor for a real infinite place.
See "Valeurs de fonctions L et periodes d'integrales" § 5.3. Note that this is not the same as
`Real.Gamma`; in particular it is a function `ℂ → ℂ`. -/
noncomputable def Gammaℝ (s : ℂ) := π ^ (-s / 2) * Gamma (s / 2)
lemma Gammaℝ_def (s : ℂ) : Gammaℝ s = π ^ (-s / 2) * Gamma (s / 2) := rfl
/-- Deligne's archimedean Gamma factor for a complex infinite place.
See "Valeurs de fonctions L et periodes d'integrales" § 5.3. (Some authors omit the factor of 2).
Note that this is not the same as `Complex.Gamma`. -/
noncomputable def Gammaℂ (s : ℂ) := 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s
lemma Gammaℂ_def (s : ℂ) : Gammaℂ s = 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s := rfl
lemma Gammaℝ_add_two {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) : Gammaℝ (s + 2) = Gammaℝ s * s / 2 / π := by
| rw [Gammaℝ_def, Gammaℝ_def, neg_div, add_div, neg_add, div_self two_ne_zero,
Gamma_add_one _ (div_ne_zero hs two_ne_zero),
cpow_add _ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero), cpow_neg_one]
field_simp [pi_ne_zero]
ring
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Deligne.lean | 53 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,410 | 2,411 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Terminal
/-!
# The natural monoidal structure on any category with finite (co)products.
A category with a monoidal structure provided in this way
is sometimes called a (co)cartesian category,
although this is also sometimes used to mean a finitely complete category.
(See <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/cartesian+category>.)
As this works with either products or coproducts,
and sometimes we want to think of a different monoidal structure entirely,
we don't set up either construct as an instance.
## Implementation
We had previously chosen to rely on `HasTerminal` and `HasBinaryProducts` instead of
`HasBinaryProducts`, because we were later relying on the definitional form of the tensor product.
Now that `has_limit` has been refactored to be a `Prop`,
this issue is irrelevant and we could simplify the construction here.
See `CategoryTheory.monoidalOfChosenFiniteProducts` for a variant of this construction
which allows specifying a particular choice of terminal object and binary products.
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {X Y : C}
open CategoryTheory.Limits
section
/-- A category with a terminal object and binary products has a natural monoidal structure. -/
def monoidalOfHasFiniteProducts [HasTerminal C] [HasBinaryProducts C] : MonoidalCategory C :=
letI : MonoidalCategoryStruct C := {
tensorObj := fun X Y ↦ X ⨯ Y
whiskerLeft := fun _ _ _ g ↦ Limits.prod.map (𝟙 _) g
whiskerRight := fun {_ _} f _ ↦ Limits.prod.map f (𝟙 _)
tensorHom := fun f g ↦ Limits.prod.map f g
tensorUnit := ⊤_ C
associator := prod.associator
leftUnitor := fun P ↦ Limits.prod.leftUnitor P
rightUnitor := fun P ↦ Limits.prod.rightUnitor P
}
.ofTensorHom
(pentagon := prod.pentagon)
(triangle := prod.triangle)
(associator_naturality := @prod.associator_naturality _ _ _)
end
namespace monoidalOfHasFiniteProducts
variable [HasTerminal C] [HasBinaryProducts C]
attribute [local instance] monoidalOfHasFiniteProducts
open scoped MonoidalCategory
@[ext] theorem unit_ext {X : C} (f g : X ⟶ 𝟙_ C) : f = g := terminal.hom_ext f g
@[ext] theorem tensor_ext {X Y Z : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y ⊗ Z)
(w₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (w₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
Limits.prod.hom_ext w₁ w₂
@[simp] theorem tensorUnit : 𝟙_ C = ⊤_ C := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tensorObj (X Y : C) : X ⊗ Y = (X ⨯ Y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : f ⊗ g = Limits.prod.map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) : X ◁ f = Limits.prod.map (𝟙 X) f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) : f ▷ Z = Limits.prod.map f (𝟙 Z) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leftUnitor_hom (X : C) : (λ_ X).hom = Limits.prod.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv (X : C) : (λ_ X).inv = prod.lift (terminal.from X) (𝟙 _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightUnitor_hom (X : C) : (ρ_ X).hom = Limits.prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rightUnitor_inv (X : C) : (ρ_ X).inv = prod.lift (𝟙 _) (terminal.from X) :=
rfl
-- We don't mark this as a simp lemma, even though in many particular
-- categories the right hand side will simplify significantly further.
-- For now, we'll plan to create specialised simp lemmas in each particular category.
theorem associator_hom (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom =
prod.lift (Limits.prod.fst ≫ Limits.prod.fst)
(prod.lift (Limits.prod.fst ≫ Limits.prod.snd) Limits.prod.snd) :=
rfl
theorem associator_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).inv =
prod.lift (prod.lift prod.fst (prod.snd ≫ prod.fst)) (prod.snd ≫ prod.snd) :=
rfl
@[reassoc] theorem associator_hom_fst (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst ≫ prod.fst := by simp [associator_hom]
@[reassoc] theorem associator_hom_snd_fst (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ prod.snd ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst ≫ prod.snd := by simp [associator_hom]
@[reassoc] theorem associator_hom_snd_snd (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ prod.snd ≫ prod.snd = prod.snd := by simp [associator_hom]
@[reassoc] theorem associator_inv_fst_fst (X Y Z : C) :
| (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ prod.fst ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst := by simp [associator_inv]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/OfHasFiniteProducts.lean | 136 | 137 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Closure
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
/-!
# Sets closed under join/meet
This file defines predicates for sets closed under `⊔` and shows that each set in a join-semilattice
generates a join-closed set and that a semilattice where every directed set has a least upper bound
is automatically complete. All dually for `⊓`.
## Main declarations
* `SupClosed`: Predicate for a set to be closed under join (`a ∈ s` and `b ∈ s` imply `a ⊔ b ∈ s`).
* `InfClosed`: Predicate for a set to be closed under meet (`a ∈ s` and `b ∈ s` imply `a ⊓ b ∈ s`).
* `IsSublattice`: Predicate for a set to be closed under meet and join.
* `supClosure`: Sup-closure. Smallest sup-closed set containing a given set.
* `infClosure`: Inf-closure. Smallest inf-closed set containing a given set.
* `latticeClosure`: Smallest sublattice containing a given set.
* `SemilatticeSup.toCompleteSemilatticeSup`: A join-semilattice where every sup-closed set has a
least upper bound is automatically complete.
* `SemilatticeInf.toCompleteSemilatticeInf`: A meet-semilattice where every inf-closed set has a
greatest lower bound is automatically complete.
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {F α β : Type*}
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
section Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is *sup-closed* if `a ⊔ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`. -/
def SupClosed (s : Set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a ⊔ b ∈ s
@[simp] lemma supClosed_empty : SupClosed (∅ : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
@[simp] lemma supClosed_singleton : SupClosed ({a} : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
@[simp] lemma supClosed_univ : SupClosed (univ : Set α) := by simp [SupClosed]
lemma SupClosed.inter (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : SupClosed t) : SupClosed (s ∩ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma supClosed_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, SupClosed s) : SupClosed (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _s hs ↦ hS _ hs (ha _ hs) (hb _ hs)
lemma supClosed_iInter (hf : ∀ i, SupClosed (f i)) : SupClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
supClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma SupClosed.directedOn (hs : SupClosed s) : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨_, hs ha hb, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.supClosed (hs : IsUpperSet s) : SupClosed s := fun _a _ _b ↦ hs le_sup_right
lemma SupClosed.preimage [FunLike F β α] [SupHomClass F β α] (hs : SupClosed s) (f : F) :
SupClosed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by simpa [map_sup] using hs ha hb
lemma SupClosed.image [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β] (hs : SupClosed s) (f : F) :
SupClosed (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [← map_sup]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| hs ha hb
lemma supClosed_range [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β] (f : F) : SupClosed (Set.range f) := by
simpa using supClosed_univ.image f
lemma SupClosed.prod {t : Set β} (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : SupClosed t) : SupClosed (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma supClosed_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SemilatticeSup (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, SupClosed (t i)) : SupClosed (s.pi t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _i hi ↦ ht _ hi (ha _ hi) (hb _ hi)
lemma SupClosed.insert_upperBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (hs : SupClosed s) (ha : a ∈ upperBounds s) :
SupClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [SupClosed]
aesop
lemma SupClosed.insert_lowerBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : SupClosed s) (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) :
SupClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [SupClosed]
have ha' : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b := fun _ a ↦ ha a
aesop
end Set
section Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {t : Finset ι} {a : α}
open Finset
lemma SupClosed.finsetSup'_mem (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.sup' ht f ∈ s :=
sup'_induction _ _ hs
lemma SupClosed.finsetSup_mem [OrderBot α] (hs : SupClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.sup f ∈ s :=
sup'_eq_sup ht f ▸ hs.finsetSup'_mem ht
end Finset
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
section Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is *inf-closed* if `a ⊓ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`. -/
def InfClosed (s : Set α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a ⊓ b ∈ s
@[simp] lemma infClosed_empty : InfClosed (∅ : Set α) := by simp [InfClosed]
@[simp] lemma infClosed_singleton : InfClosed ({a} : Set α) := by simp [InfClosed]
@[simp] lemma infClosed_univ : InfClosed (univ : Set α) := by simp [InfClosed]
lemma InfClosed.inter (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : InfClosed t) : InfClosed (s ∩ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma infClosed_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, InfClosed s) : InfClosed (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _s hs ↦ hS _ hs (ha _ hs) (hb _ hs)
lemma infClosed_iInter (hf : ∀ i, InfClosed (f i)) : InfClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
infClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma InfClosed.codirectedOn (hs : InfClosed s) : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨_, hs ha hb, inf_le_left, inf_le_right⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.infClosed (hs : IsLowerSet s) : InfClosed s := fun _a _ _b ↦ hs inf_le_right
lemma InfClosed.preimage [FunLike F β α] [InfHomClass F β α] (hs : InfClosed s) (f : F) :
InfClosed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by simpa [map_inf] using hs ha hb
lemma InfClosed.image [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β] (hs : InfClosed s) (f : F) :
InfClosed (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
rw [← map_inf]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ <| hs ha hb
lemma infClosed_range [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β] (f : F) : InfClosed (Set.range f) := by
simpa using infClosed_univ.image f
lemma InfClosed.prod {t : Set β} (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : InfClosed t) : InfClosed (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb ↦ ⟨hs ha.1 hb.1, ht ha.2 hb.2⟩
lemma infClosed_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SemilatticeInf (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, InfClosed (t i)) : InfClosed (s.pi t) :=
fun _a ha _b hb _i hi ↦ ht _ hi (ha _ hi) (hb _ hi)
lemma InfClosed.insert_upperBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (hs : InfClosed s) (ha : a ∈ upperBounds s) :
InfClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [InfClosed]
have ha' : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a := fun _ a ↦ ha a
aesop
lemma InfClosed.insert_lowerBounds {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : InfClosed s) (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) :
InfClosed (insert a s) := by
rw [InfClosed]
aesop
end Set
section Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {t : Finset ι} {a : α}
open Finset
lemma InfClosed.finsetInf'_mem (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.inf' ht f ∈ s :=
inf'_induction _ _ hs
lemma InfClosed.finsetInf_mem [OrderTop α] (hs : InfClosed s) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
(∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) → t.inf f ∈ s :=
inf'_eq_inf ht f ▸ hs.finsetInf'_mem ht
end Finset
end SemilatticeInf
open Finset OrderDual
section Lattice
variable {ι : Sort*} [Lattice α] [Lattice β] {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
open Set
/-- A set `s` is a *sublattice* if `a ⊔ b ∈ s` and `a ⊓ b ∈ s` for all `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ s`.
Note: This is not the preferred way to declare a sublattice. One should instead use `Sublattice`.
TODO: Define `Sublattice`. -/
structure IsSublattice (s : Set α) : Prop where
supClosed : SupClosed s
infClosed : InfClosed s
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_empty : IsSublattice (∅ : Set α) := ⟨supClosed_empty, infClosed_empty⟩
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_singleton : IsSublattice ({a} : Set α) :=
⟨supClosed_singleton, infClosed_singleton⟩
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_univ : IsSublattice (Set.univ : Set α) :=
⟨supClosed_univ, infClosed_univ⟩
lemma IsSublattice.inter (hs : IsSublattice s) (ht : IsSublattice t) : IsSublattice (s ∩ t) :=
⟨hs.1.inter ht.1, hs.2.inter ht.2⟩
lemma isSublattice_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsSublattice s) : IsSublattice (⋂₀ S) :=
⟨supClosed_sInter fun _s hs ↦ (hS _ hs).1, infClosed_sInter fun _s hs ↦ (hS _ hs).2⟩
lemma isSublattice_iInter (hf : ∀ i, IsSublattice (f i)) : IsSublattice (⋂ i, f i) :=
⟨supClosed_iInter fun _i ↦ (hf _).1, infClosed_iInter fun _i ↦ (hf _).2⟩
lemma IsSublattice.preimage [FunLike F β α] [LatticeHomClass F β α]
(hs : IsSublattice s) (f : F) :
IsSublattice (f ⁻¹' s) := ⟨hs.1.preimage _, hs.2.preimage _⟩
lemma IsSublattice.image [FunLike F α β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] (hs : IsSublattice s) (f : F) :
IsSublattice (f '' s) := ⟨hs.1.image _, hs.2.image _⟩
lemma IsSublattice_range [FunLike F α β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
IsSublattice (Set.range f) :=
⟨supClosed_range _, infClosed_range _⟩
lemma IsSublattice.prod {t : Set β} (hs : IsSublattice s) (ht : IsSublattice t) :
IsSublattice (s ×ˢ t) := ⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
lemma isSublattice_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Lattice (α i)] {s : Set ι}
{t : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (ht : ∀ i ∈ s, IsSublattice (t i)) : IsSublattice (s.pi t) :=
⟨supClosed_pi fun _i hi ↦ (ht _ hi).1, infClosed_pi fun _i hi ↦ (ht _ hi).2⟩
@[simp] lemma supClosed_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
SupClosed (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ InfClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma infClosed_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
InfClosed (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ SupClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma supClosed_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} :
SupClosed (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ InfClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma infClosed_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} :
InfClosed (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ SupClosed s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
IsSublattice (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsSublattice s := ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma isSublattice_preimage_ofDual :
IsSublattice (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsSublattice s := ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.2, h.1⟩⟩
alias ⟨_, InfClosed.dual⟩ := supClosed_preimage_ofDual
alias ⟨_, SupClosed.dual⟩ := infClosed_preimage_ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsSublattice.dual⟩ := isSublattice_preimage_ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsSublattice.of_dual⟩ := isSublattice_preimage_toDual
end Lattice
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
@[simp] protected lemma LinearOrder.supClosed (s : Set α) : SupClosed s :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by cases le_total a b <;> simp [*]
@[simp] protected lemma LinearOrder.infClosed (s : Set α) : InfClosed s :=
fun a ha b hb ↦ by cases le_total a b <;> simp [*]
@[simp] protected lemma LinearOrder.isSublattice (s : Set α) : IsSublattice s :=
⟨LinearOrder.supClosed _, LinearOrder.infClosed _⟩
end LinearOrder
/-! ## Closure -/
open Finset
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- Every set in a join-semilattice generates a set closed under join. -/
@[simps! isClosed]
def supClosure : ClosureOperator (Set α) := .ofPred
(fun s ↦ {a | ∃ (t : Finset α) (ht : t.Nonempty), ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.sup' ht id = a})
SupClosed
(fun s a ha ↦ ⟨{a}, singleton_nonempty _, by simpa⟩)
(by
classical
rintro s _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩ _ ⟨u, hu, hus, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ht.mono subset_union_left, ?_, sup'_union ht hu _⟩
rw [coe_union]
exact Set.union_subset hts hus)
(by rintro s₁ s₂ hs h₂ _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩; exact h₂.finsetSup'_mem ht fun i hi ↦ hs <| hts hi)
@[simp] lemma subset_supClosure {s : Set α} : s ⊆ supClosure s := supClosure.le_closure _
@[simp] lemma supClosed_supClosure : SupClosed (supClosure s) := supClosure.isClosed_closure _
lemma supClosure_mono : Monotone (supClosure : Set α → Set α) := supClosure.monotone
@[simp] lemma supClosure_eq_self : supClosure s = s ↔ SupClosed s := supClosure.isClosed_iff.symm
alias ⟨_, SupClosed.supClosure_eq⟩ := supClosure_eq_self
lemma supClosure_idem (s : Set α) : supClosure (supClosure s) = supClosure s :=
supClosure.idempotent _
@[simp] lemma supClosure_empty : supClosure (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp] lemma supClosure_singleton : supClosure {a} = {a} := by simp
@[simp] lemma supClosure_univ : supClosure (Set.univ : Set α) = Set.univ := by simp
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_supClosure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (supClosure s) = upperBounds s :=
(upperBounds_mono_set subset_supClosure).antisymm <| by
rintro a ha _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩
exact sup'_le _ _ fun b hb ↦ ha <| hts hb
@[simp] lemma isLUB_supClosure : IsLUB (supClosure s) a ↔ IsLUB s a := by simp [IsLUB]
lemma sup_mem_supClosure (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : a ⊔ b ∈ supClosure s :=
supClosed_supClosure (subset_supClosure ha) (subset_supClosure hb)
lemma finsetSup'_mem_supClosure {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} (ht : t.Nonempty) {f : ι → α}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) : t.sup' ht f ∈ supClosure s :=
supClosed_supClosure.finsetSup'_mem _ fun _i hi ↦ subset_supClosure <| hf _ hi
lemma supClosure_min : s ⊆ t → SupClosed t → supClosure s ⊆ t := supClosure.closure_min
/-- The semilatice generated by a finite set is finite. -/
protected lemma Set.Finite.supClosure (hs : s.Finite) : (supClosure s).Finite := by
lift s to Finset α using hs
classical
refine ({t ∈ s.powerset | t.Nonempty}.attach.image
fun t ↦ t.1.sup' (mem_filter.1 t.2).2 id).finite_toSet.subset ?_
rintro _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩
simp only [id_eq, coe_image, mem_image, mem_coe, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists,
Finset.mem_powerset, Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, mem_filter]
exact ⟨t, ⟨hts, ht⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma supClosure_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
supClosure (s ×ˢ t) = supClosure s ×ˢ supClosure t :=
le_antisymm (supClosure_min (Set.prod_mono subset_supClosure subset_supClosure) <|
supClosed_supClosure.prod supClosed_supClosure) <| by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨⟨u, hu, hus, rfl⟩, v, hv, hvt, rfl⟩
refine ⟨u ×ˢ v, hu.product hv, ?_, ?_⟩
· simpa only [coe_product] using Set.prod_mono hus hvt
· simp [prodMk_sup'_sup']
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- Every set in a join-semilattice generates a set closed under join. -/
@[simps! isClosed]
def infClosure : ClosureOperator (Set α) := ClosureOperator.ofPred
(fun s ↦ {a | ∃ (t : Finset α) (ht : t.Nonempty), ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.inf' ht id = a})
InfClosed
(fun s a ha ↦ ⟨{a}, singleton_nonempty _, by simpa⟩)
(by
classical
rintro s _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩ _ ⟨u, hu, hus, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ht.mono subset_union_left, ?_, inf'_union ht hu _⟩
rw [coe_union]
exact Set.union_subset hts hus)
(by rintro s₁ s₂ hs h₂ _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩; exact h₂.finsetInf'_mem ht fun i hi ↦ hs <| hts hi)
@[simp] lemma subset_infClosure {s : Set α} : s ⊆ infClosure s := infClosure.le_closure _
@[simp] lemma infClosed_infClosure : InfClosed (infClosure s) := infClosure.isClosed_closure _
lemma infClosure_mono : Monotone (infClosure : Set α → Set α) := infClosure.monotone
@[simp] lemma infClosure_eq_self : infClosure s = s ↔ InfClosed s := infClosure.isClosed_iff.symm
alias ⟨_, InfClosed.infClosure_eq⟩ := infClosure_eq_self
lemma infClosure_idem (s : Set α) : infClosure (infClosure s) = infClosure s :=
infClosure.idempotent _
@[simp] lemma infClosure_empty : infClosure (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by simp
@[simp] lemma infClosure_singleton : infClosure {a} = {a} := by simp
@[simp] lemma infClosure_univ : infClosure (Set.univ : Set α) = Set.univ := by simp
@[simp] lemma lowerBounds_infClosure (s : Set α) : lowerBounds (infClosure s) = lowerBounds s :=
(lowerBounds_mono_set subset_infClosure).antisymm <| by
rintro a ha _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩
exact le_inf' _ _ fun b hb ↦ ha <| hts hb
@[simp] lemma isGLB_infClosure : IsGLB (infClosure s) a ↔ IsGLB s a := by simp [IsGLB]
lemma inf_mem_infClosure (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : a ⊓ b ∈ infClosure s :=
infClosed_infClosure (subset_infClosure ha) (subset_infClosure hb)
lemma finsetInf'_mem_infClosure {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} (ht : t.Nonempty) {f : ι → α}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ t, f i ∈ s) : t.inf' ht f ∈ infClosure s :=
infClosed_infClosure.finsetInf'_mem _ fun _i hi ↦ subset_infClosure <| hf _ hi
lemma infClosure_min : s ⊆ t → InfClosed t → infClosure s ⊆ t := infClosure.closure_min
/-- The semilatice generated by a finite set is finite. -/
protected lemma Set.Finite.infClosure (hs : s.Finite) : (infClosure s).Finite := by
lift s to Finset α using hs
classical
refine ({t ∈ s.powerset | t.Nonempty}.attach.image
fun t ↦ t.1.inf' (mem_filter.1 t.2).2 id).finite_toSet.subset ?_
rintro _ ⟨t, ht, hts, rfl⟩
simp only [id_eq, coe_image, mem_image, mem_coe, mem_attach, true_and, Subtype.exists,
Finset.mem_powerset, Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, mem_filter]
exact ⟨t, ⟨hts, ht⟩, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Order/SupClosed.lean | 410 | 410 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 1,626 | 1,642 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
/-!
# Isomorphisms
This file defines isomorphisms between objects of a category.
## Main definitions
- `structure Iso` : a bundled isomorphism between two objects of a category;
- `class IsIso` : an unbundled version of `iso`;
note that `IsIso f` is a `Prop`, and only asserts the existence of an inverse.
Of course, this inverse is unique, so it doesn't cost us much to use choice to retrieve it.
- `inv f`, for the inverse of a morphism with `[IsIso f]`
- `asIso` : convert from `IsIso` to `Iso` (noncomputable);
- `of_iso` : convert from `Iso` to `IsIso`;
- standard operations on isomorphisms (composition, inverse etc)
## Notations
- `X ≅ Y` : same as `Iso X Y`;
- `α ≪≫ β` : composition of two isomorphisms; it is called `Iso.trans`
## Tags
category, category theory, isomorphism
-/
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
/-- An isomorphism (a.k.a. an invertible morphism) between two objects of a category.
The inverse morphism is bundled.
See also `CategoryTheory.Core` for the category with the same objects and isomorphisms playing
the role of morphisms. -/
@[stacks 0017]
structure Iso {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (X Y : C) where
/-- The forward direction of an isomorphism. -/
hom : X ⟶ Y
/-- The backwards direction of an isomorphism. -/
inv : Y ⟶ X
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism is the identity on the source. -/
hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism in reverse order
is the identity on the target. -/
inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Iso.hom_inv_id Iso.inv_hom_id
/-- Notation for an isomorphism in a category. -/
infixr:10 " ≅ " => Iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace Iso
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃α β : X ≅ Y⦄ (w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
suffices α.inv = β.inv by
cases α
cases β
cases w
cases this
rfl
calc
α.inv = α.inv ≫ β.hom ≫ β.inv := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = (α.inv ≫ α.hom) ≫ β.inv := by rw [Category.assoc, ← w]
_ = β.inv := by rw [Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- Inverse isomorphism. -/
@[symm]
def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X where
hom := I.inv
inv := I.hom
@[simp]
theorem symm_hom (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.hom = α.inv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_inv (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.inv = α.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk {X Y : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id) :
Iso.symm { hom, inv, hom_inv_id := hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id := inv_hom_id } =
{ hom := inv, inv := hom, hom_inv_id := inv_hom_id, inv_hom_id := hom_inv_id } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm_eq {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.symm = α := rfl
theorem symm_bijective {X Y : C} : Function.Bijective (symm : (X ≅ Y) → _) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm_eq, symm_symm_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem symm_eq_iff {X Y : C} {α β : X ≅ Y} : α.symm = β.symm ↔ α = β :=
symm_bijective.injective.eq_iff
theorem nonempty_iso_symm (X Y : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ Y) ↔ Nonempty (Y ≅ X) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩, fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩⟩
/-- Identity isomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X where
hom := 𝟙 X
inv := 𝟙 X
instance : Inhabited (X ≅ X) := ⟨Iso.refl X⟩
theorem nonempty_iso_refl (X : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ X) := ⟨default⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm (X : C) : (Iso.refl X).symm = Iso.refl X := rfl
/-- Composition of two isomorphisms -/
@[simps]
def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z where
hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv
@[simps]
instance instTransIso : Trans (α := C) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) where
trans := trans
/-- Notation for composition of isomorphisms. -/
infixr:80 " ≪≫ " => Iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp]
theorem trans_mk {X Y Z : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id)
(hom' : Y ⟶ Z) (inv' : Z ⟶ Y) (hom_inv_id') (inv_hom_id') (hom_inv_id'') (inv_hom_id'') :
Iso.trans ⟨hom, inv, hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id⟩ ⟨hom', inv', hom_inv_id', inv_hom_id'⟩ =
⟨hom ≫ hom', inv' ≫ inv, hom_inv_id'', inv_hom_id''⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ≪≫ β).symm = β.symm ≪≫ α.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_assoc {Z' : C} (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) (γ : Z ≅ Z') :
(α ≪≫ β) ≪≫ γ = α ≪≫ β ≪≫ γ := by
ext; simp only [trans_hom, Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (α : X ≅ Y) : Iso.refl X ≪≫ α = α := by ext; apply Category.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ Iso.refl Y = α := by ext; apply Category.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm ≪≫ α = Iso.refl Y :=
ext α.inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ α.symm = Iso.refl X :=
ext α.hom_inv_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : α.symm ≪≫ α ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, symm_self_id, refl_trans]
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : X ≅ Z) : α ≪≫ α.symm ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, self_symm_id, refl_trans]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : α.inv ≫ f = g ↔ f = α.hom ≫ g :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = α.inv ≫ f ↔ α.hom ≫ g = f :=
(inv_comp_eq α.symm).symm
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.inv = g ↔ f = g ≫ α.hom :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ α.inv ↔ g ≫ α.hom = f :=
(comp_inv_eq α.symm).symm
theorem inv_eq_inv (f g : X ≅ Y) : f.inv = g.inv ↔ f.hom = g.hom :=
have : ∀ {X Y : C} (f g : X ≅ Y), f.hom = g.hom → f.inv = g.inv := fun f g h => by rw [ext h]
⟨this f.symm g.symm, this f g⟩
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : α.hom ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_inv_comp, comp_id]
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.hom = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_comp_inv, id_comp]
theorem inv_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : α.inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.hom :=
hom_comp_eq_id α.symm
theorem comp_inv_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : f ≫ α.inv = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.hom :=
comp_hom_eq_id α.symm
theorem hom_eq_inv (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ X) : α.hom = β.inv ↔ β.hom = α.inv := by
rw [← symm_inv, inv_eq_inv α.symm β, eq_comm]
rfl
/-- The bijection `(Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def homToEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y) where
toFun f := f ≫ α.hom
invFun g := g ≫ α.inv
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
/-- The bijection `(X ⟶ Z) ≃ (Y ⟶ Z)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def homFromEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (X ⟶ Z) ≃ (Y ⟶ Z) where
toFun f := α.inv ≫ f
invFun g := α.hom ≫ g
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
end Iso
/-- `IsIso` typeclass expressing that a morphism is invertible. -/
class IsIso (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- The existence of an inverse morphism. -/
out : ∃ inv : Y ⟶ X, f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X ∧ inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y
/-- The inverse of a morphism `f` when we have `[IsIso f]`.
-/
noncomputable def inv (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] : Y ⟶ X :=
Classical.choose I.1
namespace IsIso
@[simp]
theorem hom_inv_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] : f ≫ inv f = 𝟙 X :=
(Classical.choose_spec I.1).left
@[simp]
theorem inv_hom_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] : inv f ≫ f = 𝟙 Y :=
(Classical.choose_spec I.1).right
-- FIXME putting @[reassoc] on the `hom_inv_id` above somehow unfolds `inv`
-- This happens even if we make `inv` irreducible!
-- I don't understand how this is happening: it is likely a bug.
-- attribute [reassoc] hom_inv_id inv_hom_id
-- #print hom_inv_id_assoc
-- theorem CategoryTheory.IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f]
-- {Z : C} (h : X ⟶ Z),
-- f ≫ Classical.choose (_ : Exists fun inv ↦ f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X ∧ inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y) ≫ h = h := ...
@[simp]
theorem hom_inv_id_assoc (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] {Z} (g : X ⟶ Z) : f ≫ inv f ≫ g = g := by
simp [← Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem inv_hom_id_assoc (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) : inv f ≫ f ≫ g = g := by
simp [← Category.assoc]
end IsIso
lemma Iso.isIso_hom (e : X ≅ Y) : IsIso e.hom :=
⟨e.inv, by simp, by simp⟩
lemma Iso.isIso_inv (e : X ≅ Y) : IsIso e.inv := e.symm.isIso_hom
attribute [instance] Iso.isIso_hom Iso.isIso_inv
open IsIso
/-- Reinterpret a morphism `f` with an `IsIso f` instance as an `Iso`. -/
noncomputable def asIso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : X ≅ Y :=
⟨f, inv f, hom_inv_id f, inv_hom_id f⟩
-- Porting note: the `IsIso f` argument had been instance implicit,
-- but we've changed it to implicit as a `rw` in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Functor`
-- was failing to generate it by typeclass search.
@[simp]
theorem asIso_hom (f : X ⟶ Y) {_ : IsIso f} : (asIso f).hom = f :=
rfl
-- Porting note: the `IsIso f` argument had been instance implicit,
-- but we've changed it to implicit as a `rw` in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Functor`
-- was failing to generate it by typeclass search.
@[simp]
theorem asIso_inv (f : X ⟶ Y) {_ : IsIso f} : (asIso f).inv = inv f :=
rfl
namespace IsIso
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) epi_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : Epi f where
left_cancellation g h w := by
rw [← IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc f g, w, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc f h]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) mono_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : Mono f where
right_cancellation g h w := by
rw [← Category.comp_id g, ← Category.comp_id h, ← IsIso.hom_inv_id f,
← Category.assoc, w, ← Category.assoc]
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
theorem inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (hom_inv_id : f ≫ g = 𝟙 X) :
inv f = g := by
apply (cancel_epi f).mp
simp [hom_inv_id]
theorem inv_eq_of_inv_hom_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (inv_hom_id : g ≫ f = 𝟙 Y) :
inv f = g := by
apply (cancel_mono f).mp
simp [inv_hom_id]
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
theorem eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (hom_inv_id : f ≫ g = 𝟙 X) :
g = inv f :=
(inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id hom_inv_id).symm
theorem eq_inv_of_inv_hom_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (inv_hom_id : g ≫ f = 𝟙 Y) :
g = inv f :=
(inv_eq_of_inv_hom_id inv_hom_id).symm
instance id (X : C) : IsIso (𝟙 X) := ⟨⟨𝟙 X, by simp⟩⟩
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {h : Y ⟶ Z}
instance inv_isIso [IsIso f] : IsIso (inv f) :=
(asIso f).isIso_inv
/- The following instance has lower priority for the following reason:
Suppose we are given `f : X ≅ Y` with `X Y : Type u`.
Without the lower priority, typeclass inference cannot deduce `IsIso f.hom`
because `f.hom` is defeq to `(fun x ↦ x) ≫ f.hom`, triggering a loop. -/
instance (priority := 900) comp_isIso [IsIso f] [IsIso h] : IsIso (f ≫ h) :=
(asIso f ≪≫ asIso h).isIso_hom
/--
The composition of isomorphisms is an isomorphism. Here the arguments of type `IsIso` are
explicit, to make this easier to use with the `refine` tactic, for instance.
-/
lemma comp_isIso' (_ : IsIso f) (_ : IsIso h) : IsIso (f ≫ h) := inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem inv_id : inv (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 X := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_comp [IsIso f] [IsIso h] : inv (f ≫ h) = inv h ≫ inv f := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv [IsIso f] : inv (inv f) = f := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem Iso.inv_inv (f : X ≅ Y) : inv f.inv = f.hom := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem Iso.inv_hom (f : X ≅ Y) : inv f.hom = f.inv := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : inv α ≫ f = g ↔ f = α ≫ g :=
(asIso α).inv_comp_eq
@[simp]
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = inv α ≫ f ↔ α ≫ g = f :=
(asIso α).eq_inv_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ inv α = g ↔ f = g ≫ α :=
(asIso α).comp_inv_eq
@[simp]
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ inv α ↔ g ≫ α = f :=
(asIso α).eq_comp_inv
theorem of_isIso_comp_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsIso (f ≫ g)] :
IsIso g := by
rw [← id_comp g, ← inv_hom_id f, assoc]
infer_instance
theorem of_isIso_comp_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] [IsIso (f ≫ g)] :
IsIso f := by
rw [← comp_id f, ← hom_inv_id g, ← assoc]
infer_instance
theorem of_isIso_fac_left {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [IsIso f]
[hh : IsIso h] (w : f ≫ g = h) : IsIso g := by
rw [← w] at hh
haveI := hh
exact of_isIso_comp_left f g
theorem of_isIso_fac_right {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [IsIso g]
[hh : IsIso h] (w : f ≫ g = h) : IsIso f := by
rw [← w] at hh
haveI := hh
exact of_isIso_comp_right f g
end IsIso
open IsIso
theorem eq_of_inv_eq_inv {f g : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] [IsIso g] (p : inv f = inv g) : f = g := by
apply (cancel_epi (inv f)).1
rw [inv_hom_id, p, inv_hom_id]
theorem IsIso.inv_eq_inv {f g : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] [IsIso g] : inv f = inv g ↔ f = g :=
Iso.inv_eq_inv (asIso f) (asIso g)
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : Y ⟶ X} : g ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = inv g :=
(asIso g).hom_comp_eq_id
|
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ g = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = inv g :=
(asIso g).comp_hom_eq_id
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Iso.lean | 423 | 425 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_nat := of_sub_natCast
theorem of_natCast_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_sub := of_natCast_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx * ry, cast_mul rx ry⟩
theorem of_mul_ratCast (h : Irrational (x * q)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_rat := of_mul_ratCast
theorem mul_ratCast (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * q) :=
of_mul_ratCast q⁻¹ <| by rwa [mul_assoc, ← cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq, cast_one, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_rat := mul_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_mul : Irrational (q * x) → Irrational x :=
mul_comm x q ▸ of_mul_ratCast q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_mul := of_ratCast_mul
theorem ratCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q * x) :=
mul_comm x q ▸ h.mul_ratCast hq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_mul := ratCast_mul
theorem of_mul_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
of_mul_ratCast m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_int := of_mul_intCast
theorem of_intCast_mul (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_mul m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_mul := of_intCast_mul
theorem mul_intCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.mul_ratCast ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_int := mul_intCast
theorem intCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
mul_comm x m ▸ h.mul_intCast hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_mul := intCast_mul
theorem of_mul_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_mul_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_nat := of_mul_natCast
theorem of_natCast_mul (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_mul m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_mul := of_natCast_mul
theorem mul_natCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) :=
h.mul_intCast <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_nat := mul_natCast
theorem natCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
h.intCast_mul <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_mul := natCast_mul
/-!
#### Inverse
| -/
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 393 | 394 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.IntUnitsPower
/-!
# Integer powers of (-1)
This file defines the map `negOnePow : ℤ → ℤˣ` which sends `n` to `(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n`.
The definition of `negOnePow` and some lemmas first appeared in contributions by
Johan Commelin to the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace Int
/-- The map `ℤ → ℤˣ` which sends `n` to `(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n`. -/
def negOnePow (n : ℤ) : ℤˣ := (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n
lemma negOnePow_def (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n := rfl
lemma negOnePow_add (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(n₁ + n₂).negOnePow = n₁.negOnePow * n₂.negOnePow :=
zpow_add _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_zero : negOnePow 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_one : negOnePow 1 = -1 := rfl
lemma negOnePow_succ (n : ℤ) : (n + 1).negOnePow = - n.negOnePow := by
rw [negOnePow_add, negOnePow_one, mul_neg, mul_one]
lemma negOnePow_even (n : ℤ) (hn : Even n) : n.negOnePow = 1 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [negOnePow_add, units_mul_self]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_two_mul (n : ℤ) : (2 * n).negOnePow = 1 :=
negOnePow_even _ ⟨n, two_mul n⟩
lemma negOnePow_odd (n : ℤ) (hn : Odd n) : n.negOnePow = -1 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
simp only [negOnePow_add, negOnePow_two_mul, negOnePow_one, mul_neg, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_two_mul_add_one (n : ℤ) : (2 * n + 1).negOnePow = -1 :=
negOnePow_odd _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
lemma negOnePow_eq_one_iff (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = 1 ↔ Even n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Int.not_odd_iff_even]
intro h'
simp only [negOnePow_odd _ h'] at h
contradiction
· exact negOnePow_even n
lemma negOnePow_eq_neg_one_iff (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = -1 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Int.not_even_iff_odd]
intro h'
rw [negOnePow_even _ h'] at h
contradiction
· exact negOnePow_odd n
@[simp]
theorem abs_negOnePow (n : ℤ) : |(n.negOnePow : ℤ)| = 1 := by
rw [abs_eq_natAbs, Int.units_natAbs, Nat.cast_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_neg (n : ℤ) : (-n).negOnePow = n.negOnePow := by
dsimp [negOnePow]
simp only [zpow_neg, ← inv_zpow, inv_neg, inv_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_abs (n : ℤ) : |n|.negOnePow = n.negOnePow := by
obtain h|h := abs_choice n <;> simp only [h, negOnePow_neg]
| lemma negOnePow_sub (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(n₁ - n₂).negOnePow = n₁.negOnePow * n₂.negOnePow := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, negOnePow_add, negOnePow_neg]
lemma negOnePow_eq_iff (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
n₁.negOnePow = n₂.negOnePow ↔ Even (n₁ - n₂) := by
by_cases h₂ : Even n₂
· rw [negOnePow_even _ h₂, Int.even_sub, negOnePow_eq_one_iff]
tauto
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/NegOnePow.lean | 90 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Monoids with normalization functions, `gcd`, and `lcm`
This file defines extra structures on `CancelCommMonoidWithZero`s, including `IsDomain`s.
## Main Definitions
* `NormalizationMonoid`
* `GCDMonoid`
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid`
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD`
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM`
For the `NormalizedGCDMonoid` instances on `ℕ` and `ℤ`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat`.
## Implementation Notes
* `NormalizationMonoid` is defined by assigning to each element a `normUnit` such that multiplying
by that unit normalizes the monoid, and `normalize` is an idempotent monoid homomorphism. This
definition as currently implemented does casework on `0`.
* `GCDMonoid` contains the definitions of `gcd` and `lcm` with the usual properties. They are
both determined up to a unit.
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid` extends `NormalizationMonoid`, so the `gcd` and `lcm` are always
normalized. This makes `gcd`s of polynomials easier to work with, but excludes Euclidean domains,
and monoids without zero.
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `gcd` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `gcd`.
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `lcm` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `lcm`.
## TODO
* Port GCD facts about nats, definition of coprime
* Generalize normalization monoids to commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
## Tags
divisibility, gcd, lcm, normalize
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Normalization monoid: multiplying with `normUnit` gives a normal form for associated
elements. -/
class NormalizationMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- `normUnit` assigns to each element of the monoid a unit of the monoid. -/
normUnit : α → αˣ
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps `0` to the identity. -/
normUnit_zero : normUnit 0 = 1
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` respects multiplication of non-zero elements. -/
normUnit_mul : ∀ {a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → normUnit (a * b) = normUnit a * normUnit b
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps units to their inverses. -/
normUnit_coe_units : ∀ u : αˣ, normUnit u = u⁻¹
export NormalizationMonoid (normUnit normUnit_zero normUnit_mul normUnit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] normUnit_coe_units normUnit_zero normUnit_mul
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_one : normUnit (1 : α) = 1 :=
normUnit_coe_units 1
/-- Chooses an element of each associate class, by multiplying by `normUnit` -/
def normalize : α →*₀ α where
toFun x := x * normUnit x
map_zero' := by
simp only [normUnit_zero]
exact mul_one (0 : α)
map_one' := by rw [normUnit_one, one_mul]; rfl
map_mul' x y :=
(by_cases fun hx : x = 0 => by rw [hx, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun hx =>
(by_cases fun hy : y = 0 => by rw [hy, mul_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero]) fun hy => by
simp only [normUnit_mul hx hy, Units.val_mul]; simp only [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm y]
theorem associated_normalize (x : α) : Associated x (normalize x) :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem normalize_associated (x : α) : Associated (normalize x) x :=
(associated_normalize _).symm
theorem associated_normalize_iff {x y : α} : Associated x (normalize y) ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (normalize_associated y), fun h => h.trans (associated_normalize y)⟩
theorem normalize_associated_iff {x y : α} : Associated (normalize x) y ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => (associated_normalize _).trans h, fun h => (normalize_associated _).trans h⟩
theorem Associates.mk_normalize (x : α) : Associates.mk (normalize x) = Associates.mk x :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (normalize_associated _)
theorem normalize_apply (x : α) : normalize x = x * normUnit x :=
rfl
theorem normalize_zero : normalize (0 : α) = 0 :=
normalize.map_zero
theorem normalize_one : normalize (1 : α) = 1 :=
normalize.map_one
theorem normalize_coe_units (u : αˣ) : normalize (u : α) = 1 := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_zero {x : α} : normalize x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun hx => (associated_zero_iff_eq_zero x).1 <| hx ▸ associated_normalize _, by
rintro rfl; exact normalize_zero⟩
theorem normalize_eq_one {x : α} : normalize x = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun hx => isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨_, hx⟩, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ normalize_coe_units u⟩
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_mul_normUnit (a : α) : normUnit (a * normUnit a) = 1 := by
nontriviality α using Subsingleton.elim a 0
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [normUnit_zero, zero_mul, normUnit_zero]
· rw [normUnit_mul h (Units.ne_zero _), normUnit_coe_units, mul_inv_eq_one]
@[simp]
theorem normalize_idem (x : α) : normalize (normalize x) = normalize x := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
normalize a = normalize b := by
nontriviality α
rcases associated_of_dvd_dvd hab hba with ⟨u, rfl⟩
refine by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 => ?_
suffices a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ by
simpa only [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, normUnit_mul ha u.ne_zero, normUnit_coe_units]
calc
a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u * ↑u⁻¹ := (Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [mul_right_comm a]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize_iff {x y : α} : normalize x = normalize y ↔ x ∣ y ∧ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h.symm⟩, Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h⟩⟩, fun ⟨hxy, hyx⟩ =>
normalize_eq_normalize hxy hyx⟩
theorem dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq {a b : α} (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b)
(hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ normalize_eq_normalize hab hba
theorem Associated.eq_of_normalized
{a b : α} (h : Associated a b) (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b) :
a = b :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq ha hb h.dvd h.dvd'
@[simp]
theorem dvd_normalize_iff {a b : α} : a ∣ normalize b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.dvd_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem normalize_dvd_iff {a b : α} : normalize a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.mul_right_dvd
end NormalizationMonoid
namespace Associates
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
/-- Maps an element of `Associates` back to the normalized element of its associate class -/
protected def out : Associates α → α :=
(Quotient.lift (normalize : α → α)) fun a _ ⟨_, hu⟩ =>
hu ▸ normalize_eq_normalize ⟨_, rfl⟩ (Units.mul_right_dvd.2 <| dvd_refl a)
@[simp]
theorem out_mk (a : α) : (Associates.mk a).out = normalize a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem out_one : (1 : Associates α).out = 1 :=
normalize_one
theorem out_mul (a b : Associates α) : (a * b).out = a.out * b.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ => by
simp only [Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, out_mk, mk_mul_mk, normalize.map_mul]
theorem dvd_out_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : a ∣ b.out ↔ Associates.mk a ≤ b :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
theorem out_dvd_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : b.out ∣ a ↔ b ≤ Associates.mk a :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
@[simp]
theorem out_top : (⊤ : Associates α).out = 0 :=
normalize_zero
@[simp]
theorem normalize_out (a : Associates α) : normalize a.out = a.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn a normalize_idem
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk a.out = a :=
Quotient.inductionOn a mk_normalize
theorem out_injective : Function.Injective (Associates.out : _ → α) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective mk_out
end Associates
/-- GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with `gcd` (greatest common divisor) and
`lcm` (least common multiple) operations, determined up to a unit. The type class focuses on `gcd`
and we derive the corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class GCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- The greatest common divisor between two elements. -/
gcd : α → α → α
/-- The least common multiple between two elements. -/
lcm : α → α → α
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the first element. -/
gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the second element. -/
gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b
/-- Any common divisor of both elements is a divisor of the GCD. -/
dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b
/-- The product of two elements is `Associated` with the product of their GCD and LCM. -/
gcd_mul_lcm : ∀ a b, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b)
/-- `0` is left-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_left : ∀ a, lcm 0 a = 0
/-- `0` is right-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_right : ∀ a, lcm a 0 = 0
/-- Normalized GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with normalization and `gcd`
(greatest common divisor) and `lcm` (least common multiple) operations. In this setting `gcd` and
`lcm` form a bounded lattice on the associated elements where `gcd` is the infimum, `lcm` is the
supremum, `1` is bottom, and `0` is top. The type class focuses on `gcd` and we derive the
corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class NormalizedGCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] extends NormalizationMonoid α,
GCDMonoid α where
/-- The GCD is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b
/-- The LCM is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_lcm : ∀ a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b
export GCDMonoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section GCDMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
instance [NormalizationMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [GCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
theorem gcd_isUnit_iff_isRelPrime [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} :
IsUnit (gcd a b) ↔ IsRelPrime a b :=
⟨fun h _ ha hb ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit (dvd_gcd ha hb) h, (· (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b))⟩
@[simp]
theorem normalize_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm [GCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b) :=
GCDMonoid.gcd_mul_lcm
section GCD
theorem dvd_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _), h.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩) fun ⟨hab, hac⟩ =>
dvd_gcd hab hac
theorem gcd_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (gcd a b) (gcd b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
theorem gcd_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (gcd (gcd m n) k) (gcd m (gcd n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) gcd where
comm := gcd_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) gcd where
assoc := gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) : gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
theorem gcd_zero_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 0 a) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
theorem gcd_zero_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 0) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b
let ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b
rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => by
rw [ha, hb, ← zero_dvd_iff]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rfl
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_left [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_right [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_left [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd 1 a) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
theorem gcd_one_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 1 a) 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_right [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd a 1) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem gcd_one_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 1) 1 := by simp
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left _ _).trans hab) ((gcd_dvd_right _ _).trans hcd)
protected theorem Associated.gcd [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (gcd a₁ b₁) (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd hb.dvd) (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem gcd_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c) by simpa
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a
(show d ∣ gcd b c from
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)))
(dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _))
theorem gcd_mul_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (a * b) (a * c)) (a * gcd b c) := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left']
obtain ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
apply associated_of_dvd_dvd
· rw [eq]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
exact
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (b * a) (c * a)) (gcd b c * a) := by
simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left']
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a := by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(gcd_dvd_gcd h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ gcd k m * n :=
(dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ n) H).trans (gcd_mul_right' n k m).dvd
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ gcd k m * n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k m) dvd_rfl), dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n := by
rw [mul_comm] at H ⊢
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ m * gcd k n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul dvd_rfl (gcd_dvd_right k n)), dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul⟩
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
Note: In general, this representation is highly non-unique.
See `Nat.dvdProdDvdOfDvdProd` for a constructive version on `ℕ`. -/
instance [h : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α)] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal k m n H := by
cases h
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at h0
rcases h0 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨0, n, dvd_refl 0, dvd_refl n, by simp⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left k m
refine ⟨gcd k m, a, gcd_dvd_right _ _, ?_, ha⟩
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← ha]
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd [GCDMonoid α] (k m n : α) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n := by
obtain ⟨m', n', hm', hn', h⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k (m * n))
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h
rw [h]
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _
apply mul_dvd_mul
· have hm'k : m' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_right m' n').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm'
· have hn'k : n' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_left n' m').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn'
theorem gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} :
gcd a (b ^ k) ∣ gcd a b ^ k := by
by_cases hg : gcd a b = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact
(gcd_zero_left' (0 ^ k : α)).dvd.trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_zero_left' (0 : α)).symm.dvd _)
· induction k with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]; exact (gcd_one_right' a).dvd
| succ k hk =>
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ']
trans gcd a b * gcd a (b ^ k)
· exact gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd a b (b ^ k)
· exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hg).mpr hk
theorem gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd a b ^ k :=
calc
gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd b (a ^ k) := (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd
_ ∣ gcd b a ^ k := gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
_ ∣ gcd a b ^ k := pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd _
theorem pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d₁ d₂ : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) (hc : c = d₁ * d₂) (hd₁ : d₁ ∣ a) : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 ∧ d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
have h1 : IsUnit (gcd (d₁ ^ k) b) := by
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
trans gcd d₁ b ^ k
· exact gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
· apply IsUnit.dvd
apply IsUnit.pow
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
apply dvd_trans _ hab.dvd
apply gcd_dvd_gcd hd₁ (dvd_refl b)
have h2 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a * b := by
use d₂ ^ k
rw [h, hc]
exact mul_pow d₁ d₂ k
rw [mul_comm] at h2
have h3 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
apply (dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul h2).trans
rw [h1.mul_left_dvd]
have h4 : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro hdk
rw [hdk] at h3
apply absurd (zero_dvd_iff.mp h3) ha
exact ⟨h4, h3⟩
theorem exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, Associated (d ^ k) a := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· use 0
rw [Subsingleton.elim a (0 ^ k)]
by_cases ha : a = 0
· use 0
obtain rfl | hk := eq_or_ne k 0
· simp [ha] at h
· rw [ha, zero_pow hk]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· use 1
rw [one_pow]
apply (associated_one_iff_isUnit.mpr hab).symm.trans
rw [hb]
exact gcd_zero_right' a
obtain rfl | hk := k.eq_zero_or_pos
· use 1
rw [pow_zero] at h ⊢
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, one_mul]
have hc : c ∣ a * b := by
rw [h]
exact dvd_pow_self _ hk.ne'
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, hd₁, hd₂, hc⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul hc
use d₁
obtain ⟨h0₁, ⟨a', ha'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow ha hab h hc hd₁
rw [mul_comm] at h hc
rw [(gcd_comm' a b).isUnit_iff] at hab
obtain ⟨h0₂, ⟨b', hb'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow hb hab h hc hd₂
rw [ha', hb', hc, mul_pow] at h
have h' : a' * b' = 1 := by
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₁).mp
rw [mul_one]
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₂).mp
rw [← h]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm a', ← mul_assoc _ b', ← mul_assoc b', mul_comm b']
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h'
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, ha']
theorem exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] [Subsingleton αˣ]
{a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b)) {k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, a = d ^ k :=
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow hab h
⟨d, (associated_iff_eq.mp hd).symm⟩
theorem gcd_greatest {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
GCDMonoid.gcd a b = normalize d :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
gcd_eq_normalize h (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb)
theorem gcd_greatest_associated {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
Associated d (GCDMonoid.gcd a b) :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
associated_of_dvd_dvd (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb) h
theorem isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α]
{x y x' y' : α} (ex : x = gcd x y * x') (ey : y = gcd x y * y') (h : gcd x y ≠ 0) :
IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
refine Associated.of_mul_left ?_ (Associated.refl <| gcd x y) h
convert (gcd_mul_left' (gcd x y) x' y').symm using 1
rw [← ex, ← ey, mul_one]
theorem extract_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] (x y : α) :
∃ x' y', x = gcd x y * x' ∧ y = gcd x y * y' ∧ IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
by_cases h : gcd x y = 0
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := (gcd_eq_zero_iff x y).1 h
simp_rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
exact ⟨1, 1, by rw [h, zero_mul], by rw [h, zero_mul], gcd_one_left' 1⟩
obtain ⟨x', ex⟩ := gcd_dvd_left x y
obtain ⟨y', ey⟩ := gcd_dvd_right x y
exact ⟨x', y', ex, ey, isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd ex ey h⟩
theorem associated_gcd_left_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated x (gcd x y) ↔ x ∣ y :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd dvd_rfl hxy) (gcd_dvd_left x y)⟩
theorem associated_gcd_right_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated y (gcd x y) ↔ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd hxy dvd_rfl) (gcd_dvd_right x y)⟩
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
IsUnit (gcd x y) ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [hx.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left x y), not_iff_not, associated_gcd_left_iff]
theorem Irreducible.gcd_eq_one_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
gcd x y = 1 ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [← hx.isUnit_gcd_iff, ← normalize_eq_one, NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd]
section Neg
variable [HasDistribNeg α]
lemma gcd_neg' [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : Associated (gcd a (-b)) (gcd a b) :=
Associated.gcd .rfl (.neg_left .rfl)
lemma gcd_neg [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : gcd a (-b) = gcd a b :=
gcd_neg'.eq_of_normalized (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
lemma neg_gcd' [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : Associated (gcd (-a) b) (gcd a b) :=
Associated.gcd (.neg_left .rfl) .rfl
lemma neg_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : gcd (-a) b = gcd a b :=
neg_gcd'.eq_of_normalized (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
end Neg
end GCD
section LCM
theorem lcm_dvd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} : lcm a b ∣ c ↔ a ∣ c ∧ b ∣ c := by
by_cases h : a = 0 ∨ b = 0
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;>
simp +contextual only [iff_def, lcm_zero_left, lcm_zero_right,
zero_dvd_iff, dvd_zero, eq_self_iff_true, and_true, imp_true_iff]
· obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := not_or.1 h
have h : gcd a b ≠ 0 := fun H => h1 ((gcd_eq_zero_iff _ _).1 H).1
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h, (gcd_mul_lcm a b).dvd_iff_dvd_left, ←
(gcd_mul_right' c a b).dvd_iff_dvd_right, dvd_gcd_iff, mul_comm b c, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h1,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h2, and_comm]
theorem dvd_lcm_left [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : a ∣ lcm a b :=
(lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl (lcm a b))).1
theorem dvd_lcm_right [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : b ∣ lcm a b :=
(lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl (lcm a b))).2
theorem lcm_dvd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcb : c ∣ b) : lcm a c ∣ b :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨hab, hcb⟩
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h : lcm a b = 0 => by
have : Associated (a * b) 0 := (gcd_mul_lcm a b).symm.trans <| by rw [h, mul_zero]
rwa [← mul_eq_zero, ← associated_zero_iff_eq_zero])
(by rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [apply lcm_zero_left; apply lcm_zero_right])
@[simp]
theorem normalize_lcm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_lcm a b
theorem lcm_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = lcm b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
theorem lcm_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (lcm a b) (lcm b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
theorem lcm_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _) ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
theorem lcm_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (lcm (lcm m n) k) (lcm m (lcm n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(lcm_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _) ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) lcm where
comm := lcm_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) lcm where
| assoc := lcm_assoc
theorem lcm_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : lcm a b ∣ c)
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Basic.lean | 718 | 720 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov,
Neil Strickland, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
/-!
# Divisibility in groups with zero.
Lemmas about divisibility in groups and monoids with zero.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {α : Type*}
section SemigroupWithZero
variable [SemigroupWithZero α] {a : α}
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (h : 0 ∣ a) : a = 0 :=
Dvd.elim h fun c H' => H'.trans (zero_mul c)
/-- Given an element `a` of a commutative semigroup with zero, there exists another element whose
product with zero equals `a` iff `a` equals zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_dvd_iff : 0 ∣ a ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_zero_dvd, fun h => by
rw [h]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem dvd_zero (a : α) : a ∣ 0 :=
Dvd.intro 0 (by simp)
end SemigroupWithZero
/-- Given two elements `b`, `c` of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` and a nonzero element `a`,
`a*b` divides `a*c` iff `b` divides `c`. -/
theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_left [CancelMonoidWithZero α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a * b ∣ a * c ↔ b ∣ c :=
exists_congr fun d => by rw [mul_assoc, mul_right_inj' ha]
/-- Given two elements `a`, `b` of a commutative `CancelMonoidWithZero` and a nonzero
element `c`, `a*c` divides `b*c` iff `a` divides `b`. -/
theorem mul_dvd_mul_iff_right [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c : α} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
a * c ∣ b * c ↔ a ∣ b :=
exists_congr fun d => by rw [mul_right_comm, mul_left_inj' hc]
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable [CommMonoidWithZero α]
/-- `DvdNotUnit a b` expresses that `a` divides `b` "strictly", i.e. that `b` divided by `a`
is not a unit. -/
def DvdNotUnit (a b : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ x, ¬IsUnit x ∧ b = a * x
theorem dvdNotUnit_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {a b : α} (hd : a ∣ b) (hnd : ¬b ∣ a) : DvdNotUnit a b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact hnd (dvd_zero _)
· rcases hd with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c, ?_, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩
simp at hnd
variable {x y : α}
theorem isRelPrime_zero_left : IsRelPrime 0 x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨(· (dvd_zero _) dvd_rfl), IsUnit.isRelPrime_right⟩
theorem isRelPrime_zero_right : IsRelPrime x 0 ↔ IsUnit x :=
isRelPrime_comm.trans isRelPrime_zero_left
theorem not_isRelPrime_zero_zero [Nontrivial α] : ¬IsRelPrime (0 : α) 0 :=
mt isRelPrime_zero_right.mp not_isUnit_zero
theorem IsRelPrime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero [Nontrivial α] (h : IsRelPrime x y) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 :=
not_or_of_imp <| by rintro rfl rfl; exact not_isRelPrime_zero_zero h
end CommMonoidWithZero
theorem isRelPrime_of_no_nonunits_factors [MonoidWithZero α] {x y : α} (nonzero : ¬(x = 0 ∧ y = 0))
(H : ∀ z, ¬ IsUnit z → z ≠ 0 → z ∣ x → ¬z ∣ y) : IsRelPrime x y := by
refine fun z hx hy ↦ by_contra fun h ↦ H z h ?_ hx hy
rintro rfl; exact nonzero ⟨zero_dvd_iff.1 hx, zero_dvd_iff.1 hy⟩
theorem dvd_and_not_dvd_iff [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] {x y : α} :
x ∣ y ∧ ¬y ∣ x ↔ DvdNotUnit x y :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨d, hd⟩, hyx⟩ =>
| ⟨fun hx0 => by simp [hx0] at hyx,
⟨d, mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 fun ⟨e, he⟩ => hyx ⟨e, by rw [hd, mul_assoc, ← he, mul_one]⟩,
hd⟩⟩,
fun ⟨hx0, d, hdu, hdx⟩ =>
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Divisibility.lean | 97 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Embedding
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Finite intervals of integers
This file proves that `ℤ` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as finsets and fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset Int
namespace Int
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℤ where
finsetIcc a b :=
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIco a b := (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIoc a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finsetIoo a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [lt_sub_iff_add_lt, Int.lt_add_one_iff, add_comm] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [← lt_add_one_iff] at hb
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.mp h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [← add_one_le_iff, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_comm _ (1 : ℤ), ← add_assoc] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, ← add_one_le_iff, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact ⟨sub_le_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [sub_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, sub_sub]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable (a b : ℤ)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_map :
Icc a b =
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
theorem Ico_eq_finset_map :
Ico a b = (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_map :
Ioc a b =
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_map :
Ioo a b =
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_map :
uIcc a b = (range (max a b + 1 - min a b).toNat).map
(Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding <| min a b) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : #(Icc a b) = (b + 1 - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : #(Ico a b) = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : #(Ioc a b) = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : #(Ioo a b) = (b - a - 1).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : #(uIcc a b) = (b - a).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_map _).trans <|
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).mp <| by
rw [card_range,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le <| le_add_one min_le_max), Int.natCast_add,
Int.natCast_natAbs, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, max_sub_min_eq_abs, add_comm, Int.ofNat_one]
theorem card_Icc_of_le (h : a ≤ b + 1) : (#(Icc a b) : ℤ) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [card_Icc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem card_Ico_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (#(Ico a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
rw [card_Ico, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem card_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (#(Ioc a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
rw [card_Ioc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem card_Ioo_of_lt (h : a < b) : (#(Ioo a b) : ℤ) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [card_Ioo, sub_sub, toNat_sub_of_le h]
theorem Icc_eq_pair : Finset.Icc a (a + 1) = {a, a + 1} := by
ext
simp
omega
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Icc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Icc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = (b + 1 - a).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ico (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Ico : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = (b - a).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ioc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Ioc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = (b - a).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_Ioo (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_Ioo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = (b - a - 1).toNat := by
simp
@[deprecated Fintype.card_uIcc (since := "2025-03-28")]
theorem card_fintype_uIcc : Fintype.card (Set.uIcc a b) = (b - a).natAbs + 1 := by
simp
theorem card_fintype_Icc_of_le (h : a ≤ b + 1) : (Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) : ℤ) = b + 1 - a := by
simp [h]
theorem card_fintype_Ico_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
simp [h]
theorem card_fintype_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : (Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) : ℤ) = b - a := by
simp [h]
theorem card_fintype_Ioo_of_lt (h : a < b) : (Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) : ℤ) = b - a - 1 := by
simp [h, h.le]
theorem image_Ico_emod (n a : ℤ) (h : 0 ≤ a) : (Ico n (n + a)).image (· % a) = Ico 0 a := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_lt_of_le h
· simp
ext i
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, mem_Ico]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨emod_nonneg i ha.ne', emod_lt_of_pos i ha⟩
intro hia
have hn := Int.emod_add_ediv n a
obtain hi | hi := lt_or_le i (n % a)
· refine ⟨i + a * (n / a + 1), ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [add_comm (n / a), mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc]
refine hn.symm.le.trans (add_le_add_right ?_ _)
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add hia.left (Int.emod_lt_of_pos n ha).le
· refine lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_right hi (a * (n / a + 1))) ?_
rw [mul_add, mul_one, ← add_assoc, hn]
· rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, Int.emod_eq_of_lt hia.left hia.right]
| · refine ⟨i + a * (n / a), ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact hn.symm.le.trans (add_le_add_right hi _)
· rw [add_comm n a]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hia.right (le_trans ?_ hn.le)
simp only [Nat.zero_le, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact Int.emod_nonneg n (ne_of_gt ha)
· rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, Int.emod_eq_of_lt hia.left hia.right]
end Int
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Interval.lean | 189 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Action
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
/-!
# Finite sums over modules over a ring
-/
variable {ι κ α β R M : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem List.sum_smul {l : List R} {x : M} : l.sum • x = (l.map fun r ↦ r • x).sum :=
map_list_sum ((smulAddHom R M).flip x) l
theorem Multiset.sum_smul {l : Multiset R} {x : M} : l.sum • x = (l.map fun r ↦ r • x).sum :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_multiset_sum l
theorem Multiset.sum_smul_sum {s : Multiset R} {t : Multiset M} :
s.sum • t.sum = ((s ×ˢ t).map fun p : R × M ↦ p.fst • p.snd).sum := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction with a s ih
· simp
· simp [add_smul, ih, ← Multiset.smul_sum]
theorem Finset.sum_smul {f : ι → R} {s : Finset ι} {x : M} :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) • x = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • x := map_sum ((smulAddHom R M).flip x) f s
lemma Finset.sum_smul_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) {f : α → R} {g : β → M} :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) • ∑ j ∈ t, g j = ∑ i ∈ s, ∑ j ∈ t, f i • g j := by
simp_rw [sum_smul, ← smul_sum]
lemma Fintype.sum_smul_sum [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (f : α → R) (g : β → M) :
(∑ i, f i) • ∑ j, g j = ∑ i, ∑ j, f i • g j := Finset.sum_smul_sum _ _
end AddCommMonoid
open Finset
theorem Finset.cast_card [NonAssocSemiring R] (s : Finset α) : (#s : R) = ∑ _ ∈ s, 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_const, Nat.smul_one_eq_cast]
namespace Fintype
| variable [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] [AddCommMonoid α]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/BigOperators.lean | 50 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 1,128 | 1,130 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Pim Otte. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Pim Otte
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Antidiag.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.DoubleFactorial
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
/-!
# Multinomial
This file defines the multinomial coefficient and several small lemma's for manipulating it.
## Main declarations
- `Nat.multinomial`: the multinomial coefficient
## Main results
- `Finset.sum_pow`: The expansion of `(s.sum x) ^ n` using multinomial coefficients
-/
open Finset
open scoped Nat
namespace Nat
variable {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℕ) {a b : α} (n : ℕ)
/-- The multinomial coefficient. Gives the number of strings consisting of symbols
from `s`, where `c ∈ s` appears with multiplicity `f c`.
Defined as `(∑ i ∈ s, f i)! / ∏ i ∈ s, (f i)!`.
-/
def multinomial : ℕ :=
(∑ i ∈ s, f i)! / ∏ i ∈ s, (f i)!
theorem multinomial_pos : 0 < multinomial s f :=
Nat.div_pos (le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (prod_factorial_dvd_factorial_sum s f))
(prod_factorial_pos s f)
theorem multinomial_spec : (∏ i ∈ s, (f i)!) * multinomial s f = (∑ i ∈ s, f i)! :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (prod_factorial_dvd_factorial_sum s f)
@[simp] lemma multinomial_empty : multinomial ∅ f = 1 := by simp [multinomial]
variable {s f}
lemma multinomial_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : α → ℕ) :
multinomial (s.cons a ha) f = (f a + ∑ i ∈ s, f i).choose (f a) * multinomial s f := by
rw [multinomial, Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left _ (prod_factorial_dvd_factorial_sum _ _), prod_cons,
multinomial, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm _ (f a)!,
Nat.div_mul_cancel (prod_factorial_dvd_factorial_sum _ _), ← mul_assoc, Nat.choose_symm_add,
Nat.add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial, Finset.sum_cons]
positivity
lemma multinomial_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : α → ℕ) :
multinomial (insert a s) f = (f a + ∑ i ∈ s, f i).choose (f a) * multinomial s f := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ ha, multinomial_cons]
@[simp] lemma multinomial_singleton (a : α) (f : α → ℕ) : multinomial {a} f = 1 := by
rw [← cons_empty, multinomial_cons]; simp
@[simp]
theorem multinomial_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s) (h₁ : f a = 1) :
multinomial (insert a s) f = (s.sum f).succ * multinomial s f := by
simp only [multinomial]
rw [Finset.sum_insert h, Finset.prod_insert h, h₁, add_comm, ← succ_eq_add_one, factorial_succ]
simp only [factorial, succ_eq_add_one, zero_add, mul_one, one_mul]
rw [Nat.mul_div_assoc _ (prod_factorial_dvd_factorial_sum _ _)]
theorem multinomial_congr {f g : α → ℕ} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) :
multinomial s f = multinomial s g := by
simp only [multinomial]; congr 1
· rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl h]
· exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun a ha => by rw [h a ha]
/-! ### Connection to binomial coefficients
When `Nat.multinomial` is applied to a `Finset` of two elements `{a, b}`, the
result a binomial coefficient. We use `binomial` in the names of lemmas that
involves `Nat.multinomial {a, b}`.
-/
theorem binomial_eq [DecidableEq α] (h : a ≠ b) :
multinomial {a, b} f = (f a + f b)! / ((f a)! * (f b)!) := by
simp [multinomial, Finset.sum_pair h, Finset.prod_pair h]
theorem binomial_eq_choose [DecidableEq α] (h : a ≠ b) :
multinomial {a, b} f = (f a + f b).choose (f a) := by
simp [binomial_eq h, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.le_add_right _ _)]
theorem binomial_spec [DecidableEq α] (hab : a ≠ b) :
(f a)! * (f b)! * multinomial {a, b} f = (f a + f b)! := by
simpa [Finset.sum_pair hab, Finset.prod_pair hab] using multinomial_spec {a, b} f
@[simp]
theorem binomial_one [DecidableEq α] (h : a ≠ b) (h₁ : f a = 1) :
multinomial {a, b} f = (f b).succ := by
simp [multinomial_insert_one (Finset.not_mem_singleton.mpr h) h₁]
theorem binomial_succ_succ [DecidableEq α] (h : a ≠ b) :
multinomial {a, b} (Function.update (Function.update f a (f a).succ) b (f b).succ) =
multinomial {a, b} (Function.update f a (f a).succ) +
multinomial {a, b} (Function.update f b (f b).succ) := by
simp only [binomial_eq_choose, Function.update_apply,
h, Ne, ite_true, ite_false, not_false_eq_true]
rw [if_neg h.symm]
rw [add_succ, choose_succ_succ, succ_add_eq_add_succ]
ring
theorem succ_mul_binomial [DecidableEq α] (h : a ≠ b) :
(f a + f b).succ * multinomial {a, b} f =
(f a).succ * multinomial {a, b} (Function.update f a (f a).succ) := by
rw [binomial_eq_choose h, binomial_eq_choose h, mul_comm (f a).succ, Function.update_self,
Function.update_of_ne h.symm]
rw [succ_mul_choose_eq (f a + f b) (f a), succ_add (f a) (f b)]
/-! ### Simple cases -/
theorem multinomial_univ_two (a b : ℕ) :
multinomial Finset.univ ![a, b] = (a + b)! / (a ! * b !) := by
rw [multinomial, Fin.sum_univ_two, Fin.prod_univ_two]
dsimp only [Matrix.cons_val]
theorem multinomial_univ_three (a b c : ℕ) :
multinomial Finset.univ ![a, b, c] = (a + b + c)! / (a ! * b ! * c !) := by
rw [multinomial, Fin.sum_univ_three, Fin.prod_univ_three]
rfl
end Nat
/-! ### Alternative definitions -/
namespace Finsupp
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Alternative multinomial definition based on a finsupp, using the support
for the big operations
-/
def multinomial (f : α →₀ ℕ) : ℕ :=
(f.sum fun _ => id)! / f.prod fun _ n => n !
theorem multinomial_eq (f : α →₀ ℕ) : f.multinomial = Nat.multinomial f.support f :=
rfl
theorem multinomial_update (a : α) (f : α →₀ ℕ) :
f.multinomial = (f.sum fun _ => id).choose (f a) * (f.update a 0).multinomial := by
simp only [multinomial_eq]
classical
by_cases h : a ∈ f.support
· rw [← Finset.insert_erase h, Nat.multinomial_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase a _),
Finset.add_sum_erase _ f h, support_update_zero]
congr 1
exact Nat.multinomial_congr fun _ h ↦ (Function.update_of_ne (mem_erase.1 h).1 0 f).symm
rw [not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [h, Nat.choose_zero_right, one_mul, ← h, update_self]
end Finsupp
namespace Multiset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Alternative definition of multinomial based on `Multiset` delegating to the
finsupp definition
-/
def multinomial [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
m.toFinsupp.multinomial
theorem multinomial_filter_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
m.multinomial = m.card.choose (m.count a) * (m.filter (a ≠ ·)).multinomial := by
dsimp only [multinomial]
convert Finsupp.multinomial_update a _
· rw [← Finsupp.card_toMultiset, m.toFinsupp_toMultiset]
· ext1 a
rw [toFinsupp_apply, count_filter, Finsupp.coe_update]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h.symm, toFinsupp_apply]
· rw [not_ne_iff.1 h, Function.update_self]
@[simp]
theorem multinomial_zero [DecidableEq α] : multinomial (0 : Multiset α) = 1 := by
simp [multinomial, Finsupp.multinomial]
end Multiset
namespace Finset
open _root_.Nat
/-! ### Multinomial theorem -/
variable {α R : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
-- TODO: Can we prove one of the following two from the other one?
/-- The **multinomial theorem**. -/
lemma sum_pow_eq_sum_piAntidiag_of_commute (s : Finset α) (f : α → R)
(hc : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on f)) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ n = ∑ k ∈ piAntidiag s n, multinomial s k *
s.noncommProd (fun i ↦ f i ^ k i) (hc.mono' fun _ _ h ↦ h.pow_pow ..) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with a s has ih generalizing n
· cases n <;> simp
rw [Finset.sum_cons, piAntidiag_cons, sum_disjiUnion]
simp only [sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Pi.add_apply, multinomial_cons,
Pi.add_apply, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, Nat.cast_mul, noncommProd_cons, eq_self_iff_true,
if_true, sum_add_distrib, sum_ite_eq', has, if_false, add_zero,
addLeftEmbedding_eq_addRightEmbedding, addRightEmbedding_apply]
suffices ∀ p : ℕ × ℕ, p ∈ antidiagonal n →
∑ g ∈ piAntidiag s p.2, ((g a + p.1 + s.sum g).choose (g a + p.1) : R) *
multinomial s (g + fun i ↦ ite (i = a) p.1 0) *
(f a ^ (g a + p.1) * s.noncommProd (fun i ↦ f i ^ (g i + ite (i = a) p.1 0))
((hc.mono (by simp)).mono' fun i j h ↦ h.pow_pow ..)) =
∑ g ∈ piAntidiag s p.2, n.choose p.1 * multinomial s g * (f a ^ p.1 *
s.noncommProd (fun i ↦ f i ^ g i) ((hc.mono (by simp)).mono' fun i j h ↦ h.pow_pow ..)) by
rw [sum_congr rfl this]
simp only [Nat.antidiagonal_eq_map, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
rw [(Commute.sum_right _ _ _ fun i hi ↦ hc (by simp) (by simp [hi])
(by simpa [eq_comm] using ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi has)).add_pow]
simp only [ih (hc.mono (by simp)), sum_mul, mul_sum]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ sum_congr rfl fun g _ ↦ ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_comm, (Nat.commute_cast (f a ^ i) _).left_comm, mul_assoc]
refine fun p hp ↦ sum_congr rfl fun f hf ↦ ?_
rw [mem_piAntidiag] at hf
rw [not_imp_comm.1 (hf.2 _) has, zero_add, hf.1]
congr 2
· rw [mem_antidiagonal.1 hp]
· rw [multinomial_congr]
intro t ht
rw [Pi.add_apply, if_neg, add_zero]
exact ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ht has
refine noncommProd_congr rfl (fun t ht ↦ ?_) _
rw [if_neg, add_zero]
exact ne_of_mem_of_not_mem ht has
/-- The **multinomial theorem**. -/
theorem sum_pow_of_commute (x : α → R) (s : Finset α)
(hc : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on x)) :
∀ n,
s.sum x ^ n =
∑ k : s.sym n,
k.1.1.multinomial *
(k.1.1.map <| x).noncommProd
(Multiset.map_set_pairwise <| hc.mono <| mem_sym_iff.1 k.2) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s ha ih
· rw [sum_empty]
rintro (_ | n)
· rw [_root_.pow_zero, Fintype.sum_subsingleton]
swap
· exact ⟨0, by simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]⟩
convert (@one_mul R _ _).symm
convert @Nat.cast_one R _
simp
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, mul_zero]
haveI : IsEmpty (Finset.sym (∅ : Finset α) n.succ) := Finset.instIsEmpty
apply (Fintype.sum_empty _).symm
intro n; specialize ih (hc.mono <| s.subset_insert a)
rw [sum_insert ha, (Commute.sum_right s _ _ _).add_pow, sum_range]; swap
· exact fun _ hb => hc (mem_insert_self a s) (mem_insert_of_mem hb)
(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha).symm
· simp_rw [ih, mul_sum, sum_mul, sum_sigma', univ_sigma_univ]
refine (Fintype.sum_equiv (symInsertEquiv ha) _ _ fun m => ?_).symm
rw [m.1.1.multinomial_filter_ne a]
conv in m.1.1.map _ => rw [← m.1.1.filter_add_not (a = ·), Multiset.map_add]
simp_rw [Multiset.noncommProd_add, m.1.1.filter_eq, Multiset.map_replicate, m.1.2]
rw [Multiset.noncommProd_eq_pow_card _ _ _ fun _ => Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate]
rw [Multiset.card_replicate, Nat.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Nat.cast_comm]
congr 1; simp_rw [← mul_assoc, Nat.cast_comm]; rfl
|
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {f : α → R} {s : Finset α}
lemma sum_pow_eq_sum_piAntidiag (s : Finset α) (f : α → R) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) ^ n = ∑ k ∈ piAntidiag s n, multinomial s k * ∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ k i := by
simp_rw [← noncommProd_eq_prod]
rw [← sum_pow_eq_sum_piAntidiag_of_commute _ _ fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ Commute.all ..]
theorem sum_pow (x : α → R) (n : ℕ) :
s.sum x ^ n = ∑ k ∈ s.sym n, k.val.multinomial * (k.val.map x).prod := by
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Multinomial.lean | 284 | 296 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
| x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 299 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `atTop`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α` to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `TendstoUniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.continuousOn`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `TendstoUniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `TendstoUniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
Finally, we introduce the notion of a uniform Cauchy sequence, which is to uniform
convergence what a Cauchy sequence is to the usual notion of convergence.
## Implementation notes
We derive most of our initial results from an auxiliary definition `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter`.
This definition in and of itself can sometimes be useful, e.g., when studying the local behavior
of the `Fₙ` near a point, which would typically look like `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓝 x)`.
Still, while this may be the "correct" definition (see
`tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter`), it is somewhat unwieldy to work with in
practice. Thus, we provide the more traditional definition in `TendstoUniformlyOn`.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set Uniform
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f`
with respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has
`p ×ˢ p'`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
/--
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ p'` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `p'`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ 𝓟 s` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `s`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ ⊤` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hx : 𝓟 {x} ≤ p') : Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.mpr fun u hu => mem_map.mpr ?_
filter_upwards [(h u hu).curry]
intro i h
simpa using h.filter_mono hx
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| hx)
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at le_top
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p'' p' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p'' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p.prod_mono_right hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.mono (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s' :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr h'))
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', F n.fst n.snd = F' n.fst n.snd) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f p p' := by
refine fun u hu => ((hf u hu).and hff').mono fun n h => ?_
rw [← h.right]
exact h.left
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n in p, Set.EqOn (F n) (F' n) s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at hf ⊢
refine hf.congr ?_
rw [eventually_iff] at hff' ⊢
simp only [Set.EqOn] at hff'
simp only [mem_prod_principal, hff', mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendstoUniformly_congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hF : F =ᶠ[p] F') :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformly F' f p := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ] at *
have HF := EventuallyEq.exists_mem hF
exact ⟨fun h => h.congr (by aesop), fun h => h.congr (by simp_rw [eqOn_comm]; aesop)⟩
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right {g : α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hfg : EqOn f g s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F g p s := fun u hu => by
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with i hi a ha using hfg ha ▸ hi a ha
protected theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMap tendsto_comap)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [TendstoUniformlyOn, comap_principal] using TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp h g
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.comp (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [principal_univ, comap_principal] using h.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p p' := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p s := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {q : Filter ι'} {q' : Filter α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q q') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ q)
(p' ×ˢ q') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h h' ⊢
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, ← map_swap4_prod, tendsto_map'_iff]
simpa using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s') :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p')
(s ×ˢ s') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h h' ⊢
simpa only [prod_principal_principal] using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p') := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, ← univ_prod_univ] at *
exact h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod_map := TendstoUniformly.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {q : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ q) p' :=
fun u hu => ((h.prodMap h') u hu).diag_of_prod_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk
protected theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p')
s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p') :=
(h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod := TendstoUniformly.prodMk
/-- Uniform convergence on a filter `p'` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ p'`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_filter_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F (fun _ => c) p p' := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]
rfl
/-- Uniform convergence on a set `s` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ 𝓟 s`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_principal_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOn F (fun _ => c) p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in `p ×ˢ ⊤`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_top_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformly F (fun _ => c) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on the empty set is vacuously true -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_empty : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p ∅ := fun u _ => by simp
/-- Uniform convergence on a singleton is equivalent to regular convergence -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_singleton_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p {x} ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x)) := by
simp_rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right, tendsto_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp [mem_prod_principal, preimage]
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(p' : Filter α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p p' := by
simpa only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff] using hg.comp (tendsto_fst (g := p'))
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOn_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(s : Set α) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr (hg.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const (𝓟 s))
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
{V : Set β} {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ V)) (hU : x ∈ U) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F (F x) (𝓝[U] x) V := by
set φ := fun q : α × β => ((x, q.2), q)
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto]
change Tendsto (Prod.map (↿F) ↿F ∘ φ) (𝓝[U] x ×ˢ 𝓟 V) (𝓤 γ)
simp only [nhdsWithin, Filter.prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_assoc, comap_principal, inf_principal]
refine hF.comp (Tendsto.inf ?_ <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun x hx => ⟨⟨hU, hx.2⟩, hx⟩)
simp only [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, (· ∘ ·),
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap]
exact tendsto_comap.prodMk (tendsto_diag_uniformity _ _)
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ (univ : Set β))) :
TendstoUniformly F (F x) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hU]
using hF.tendstoUniformlyOn (mem_of_mem_nhds hU)
theorem UniformContinuous₂.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {f : α → β → γ}
(h : UniformContinuous₂ f) : TendstoUniformly f (f x) (𝓝 x) :=
UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly univ_mem <| by rwa [univ_prod_univ, uniformContinuousOn_univ]
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : (ι × ι) × α in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', (F m.fst.fst m.snd, F m.fst.snd m.snd) ∈ u
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOn (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : ι × ι in p ×ˢ p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (F m.fst x, F m.snd x) ∈ u
theorem uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s ↔ UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [UniformCauchySeqOn, UniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
refine forall₂_congr fun u hu => ?_
rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by rwa [← uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p' := by
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
have := tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((hF t ht).prod_mk (hF t ht))
apply this.diag_of_prod_right.mono
simp only [and_imp, Prod.forall]
intro n1 n2 x hl hr
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (prodMk_mem_compRel (htsymm hl) hr) htmem
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.uniformCauchySeqOn (hF : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s :=
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mpr
hF.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto
(hF : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hF' : ∀ᶠ x : α in p', Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' := by
rcases p.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [TendstoUniformlyOnFilter, bot_prod, eventually_bot, implies_true]
-- Proof idea: |f_n(x) - f(x)| ≤ |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| + |f_m(x) - f(x)|. We choose `n`
-- so that |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| is uniformly small across `s` whenever `m ≥ n`. Then for
-- a fixed `x`, we choose `m` sufficiently large such that |f_m(x) - f(x)| is small.
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
-- We will choose n, x, and m simultaneously. n and x come from hF. m comes from hF'
-- But we need to promote hF' to the full product filter to use it
have hmc : ∀ᶠ x in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x.snd) p (𝓝 (f x.snd)) := by
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ => True, by simp, _, hF', by simp⟩
-- To apply filter operations we'll need to do some order manipulation
rw [Filter.eventually_swap_iff]
have := tendsto_prodAssoc.eventually (tendsto_prod_swap.eventually ((hF t ht).and hmc))
apply this.curry.mono
simp only [Equiv.prodAssoc_apply, eventually_and, eventually_const, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap,
and_imp, Prod.forall]
-- Complete the proof
intro x n hx hm'
refine Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (mem_compRel.mpr ?_) htmem
rw [Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right] at hm'
have := hx.and (hm' ht)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this.exists
exact ⟨F m x, ⟨hm.2, htsymm hm.1⟩⟩
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_tendsto (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(hF' : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(hF.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto hF')
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p'' p' := by
intro u hu
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left (Filter.prod_mono hp hp))
exact this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p'' := fun u hu =>
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono ((p ×ˢ p).prod_mono_right hp)
this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.mono (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hss' : s' ⊆ s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s' := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr hss')
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(g : γ → α) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := fun u hu => by
obtain ⟨pa, hpa, pb, hpb, hpapb⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.mp (hf u hu)
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
refine ⟨pa, hpa, pb ∘ g, ?_, fun hx _ hy => hpapb hx hy⟩
exact eventually_comap.mpr (hpb.mono fun x hx y hy => by simp only [hx, hy, Function.comp_apply])
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (g : γ → α) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
simpa only [UniformCauchySeqOn, comap_principal] using hf.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_uniformCauchySeqOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => g ∘ F n) p s := fun _u hu => hf _ (hg hu)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s') :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (s ×ˢ s') := by
intro u hu
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_prod, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at hu
obtain ⟨v, hv, w, hw, hvw⟩ := hu
simp_rw [mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.map_apply]
rw [← Set.image_subset_iff] at hvw
apply (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((h v hv).prod_mk (h' w hw))).mono
intro x hx a b ha hb
exact hvw ⟨_, mk_mem_prod (hx.1 a ha) (hx.2 b hb), rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformCauchySeqOn.prod_map := UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.fst a, F' i.snd a)) (p ×ˢ p') s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod' {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι → α → β'}
(h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι) a => (F i a, F' i a)) p s := fun u hu =>
have hh : Tendsto (fun x : ι => (x, x)) p (p ×ˢ p) := tendsto_diag
(hh.prodMap hh).eventually ((h.prod h') u hu)
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchy_map [hp : NeBot p] (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Cauchy (map (fun i => F i x) p) := by
simp only [cauchy_map_iff, hp, true_and]
intro u hu
rw [mem_map]
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with p hp using hp x hx
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. See `UniformCauchSeqOn.cauchy_map` for the non-`atTop` case. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchySeq [Nonempty ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
(hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F atTop s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
CauchySeq fun i ↦ F i x :=
hf.cauchy_map (hp := atTop_neBot) hx
section SeqTendsto
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
(h : ∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro u hu
rw [tendsto_prod_iff'] at hu
specialize h (fun n => (u n).fst) hu.1
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMk hu.2)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s)
(u : ℕ → ι) (hu : Tendsto u atTop l) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp ((hu.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk tendsto_snd)
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s :=
⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn, tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn⟩
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_seq_tendstoUniformly {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformly F f l ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformly (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ]
exact tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn
end SeqTendsto
section
variable [NeBot p] {L : ι → β} {ℓ : β}
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_left]
intro s hs
| rw [mem_map, Set.preimage, ← eventually_iff]
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hs
have p1 : ∀ᶠ i in p, (L i, ℓ) ∈ t := tendsto_nhds_left.mp h3 ht
have p2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (F i x, L i) ∈ t := by
filter_upwards [h2] with i h2 using tendsto_nhds_left.mp h2 ht
have p3 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (f x, F i x) ∈ t := (h1 t ht).curry
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 545 | 550 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid on `M.E` which a set `B ⊆ M.E` is a base if and only if
`M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_isBase.imp (fun _ hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I' ⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
obtain rfl : I = B' \ X := hI.eq_of_subset_indep (hB'.indep.diff _)
(subset_diff.2 ⟨hIB', (subset_diff.1 hI.subset).2⟩)
(diff_subset_diff_left hB'.subset_ground)
simp_rw [maximal_subset_iff']
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E, ?_, ⟨⟨inter_subset_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [subset_inter_iff, and_iff_left hI'E, subset_diff, and_iff_right hI'X]
exact Disjoint.mono_right hB'IB <| disjoint_union_right.2
⟨disjoint_sdiff_right.mono_left hI'X , hI'B⟩
· exact ⟨B', hB', (disjoint_sdiff_left (t := X)).mono_left inter_subset_left⟩
· exact inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset
simp only [subset_inter_iff, subset_diff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine fun J hJE B'' hB'' hdj hJX hXJ ↦ ⟨⟨hJX, ?_⟩, hJE⟩
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset, ← union_diff_cancel hJX,
inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, empty_union, diff_eq, ← inter_assoc,
← diff_eq, diff_subset_comm, diff_eq, inter_assoc, ← diff_eq, inter_comm]
exact subset_trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ hB''.subset_ground) hXJ
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
obtain rfl : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩ ?_
exact hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he (subset_union_right.trans hI'B₁))
by_contra hdj'
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hdj'
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues.) -/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.IsBase B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff,
iff_true_intro Or.inl]
instance dual_finite [M.Finite] : M✶.Finite :=
⟨M.ground_finite⟩
instance dual_nonempty [M.Nonempty] : M✶.Nonempty :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty⟩
@[simp] theorem dual_isBase_iff (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) := by
rw [isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase, isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff,
maximal_subset_iff]
simp [dual_indep_iff_exists', hB]
theorem dual_isBase_iff' : M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ∧ B ⊆ M.E :=
(em (B ⊆ M.E)).elim (fun h ↦ by rw [dual_isBase_iff, and_iff_left h])
(fun h ↦ iff_of_false (h ∘ (fun h' ↦ h'.subset_ground)) (h ∘ And.right))
|
theorem setOf_dual_isBase_eq : {B | M✶.IsBase B} = (fun X ↦ M.E \ X) '' {B | M.IsBase B} := by
ext B
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 147 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ModularLattice
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
/-!
# Atoms, Coatoms, and Simple Lattices
This module defines atoms, which are minimal non-`⊥` elements in bounded lattices, simple lattices,
which are lattices with only two elements, and related ideas.
## Main definitions
### Atoms and Coatoms
* `IsAtom a` indicates that the only element below `a` is `⊥`.
* `IsCoatom a` indicates that the only element above `a` is `⊤`.
### Atomic and Atomistic Lattices
* `IsAtomic` indicates that every element other than `⊥` is above an atom.
* `IsCoatomic` indicates that every element other than `⊤` is below a coatom.
* `IsAtomistic` indicates that every element is the `sSup` of a set of atoms.
* `IsCoatomistic` indicates that every element is the `sInf` of a set of coatoms.
* `IsStronglyAtomic` indicates that for all `a < b`, there is some `x` with `a ⋖ x ≤ b`.
* `IsStronglyCoatomic` indicates that for all `a < b`, there is some `x` with `a ≤ x ⋖ b`.
### Simple Lattices
* `IsSimpleOrder` indicates that an order has only two unique elements, `⊥` and `⊤`.
* `IsSimpleOrder.boundedOrder`
* `IsSimpleOrder.distribLattice`
* Given an instance of `IsSimpleOrder`, we provide the following definitions. These are not
made global instances as they contain data :
* `IsSimpleOrder.booleanAlgebra`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeLattice`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeBooleanAlgebra`
## Main results
* `isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom` and `isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom` express the (definitional) duality
of `IsAtom` and `IsCoatom`.
* `isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top` and `isSimpleOrder_iff_isCoatom_bot` express the
connection between atoms, coatoms, and simple lattices
* `IsCompl.isAtom_iff_isCoatom` and `IsCompl.isCoatom_if_isAtom`: In a modular
bounded lattice, a complement of an atom is a coatom and vice versa.
* `isAtomic_iff_isCoatomic`: A modular complemented lattice is atomic iff it is coatomic.
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
section Atoms
section IsAtom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
/-- An atom of an `OrderBot` is an element with no other element between it and `⊥`,
which is not `⊥`. -/
def IsAtom (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b, b < a → b = ⊥
theorem IsAtom.Iic (ha : IsAtom a) (hax : a ≤ x) : IsAtom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Iic x) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 con), fun ⟨b, _⟩ hba => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 (ha.2 b hba)⟩
theorem IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic {a : Set.Iic x} (ha : IsAtom a) : IsAtom (a : α) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.ext con), fun b hba =>
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (ha.2 ⟨b, hba.le.trans a.prop⟩ hba)⟩
theorem isAtom_iff_le_of_ge : IsAtom a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊥, b ≤ a → a ≤ b :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
forall_congr' fun b => by
simp only [Ne, @not_imp_comm (b = ⊥), Classical.not_imp, lt_iff_le_not_le]
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsAtom.lt_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x < a ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨h.2 x, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h.1.bot_lt⟩
theorem IsAtom.le_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x ≤ a ↔ x = ⊥ ∨ x = a := by rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, h.lt_iff]
lemma IsAtom.bot_lt (h : IsAtom a) : ⊥ < a :=
h.lt_iff.mpr rfl
lemma IsAtom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsAtom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
ha.le_iff.trans <| or_iff_right hb
theorem IsAtom.Iic_eq (h : IsAtom a) : Set.Iic a = {⊥, a} :=
Set.ext fun _ => h.le_iff
@[simp]
theorem bot_covBy_iff : ⊥ ⋖ a ↔ IsAtom a := by
simp only [CovBy, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, IsAtom, not_imp_not]
alias ⟨CovBy.is_atom, IsAtom.bot_covBy⟩ := bot_covBy_iff
end PartialOrder
theorem atom_le_iSup [Order.Frame α] {a : α} (ha : IsAtom a) {f : ι → α} :
a ≤ iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => le_trans hi (le_iSup _ _)⟩
show (a ≤ ⨆ i, f i) → _
refine fun h => of_not_not fun ha' => ?_
push_neg at ha'
have ha'' : Disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff.2 fun i => fun x hxa hxf => le_bot_iff.2 <| of_not_not fun hx =>
have hxa : x < a := (le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hxa).resolve_left (by rintro rfl; exact ha' _ hxf)
hx (ha.2 _ hxa)
obtain rfl := le_bot_iff.1 (ha'' le_rfl h)
exact ha.1 rfl
end IsAtom
section IsCoatom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A coatom of an `OrderTop` is an element with no other element between it and `⊤`,
which is not `⊤`. -/
def IsCoatom [OrderTop α] (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b, a < b → b = ⊤
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom [OrderBot α] {a : α} :
IsCoatom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom [OrderTop α] {a : α} :
IsAtom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsAtom.dual⟩ := isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom
alias ⟨_, IsCoatom.dual⟩ := isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom
variable [OrderTop α] {a x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.Ici (ha : IsCoatom a) (hax : x ≤ a) : IsCoatom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Ici x) :=
ha.dual.Iic hax
theorem IsCoatom.of_isCoatom_coe_Ici {a : Set.Ici x} (ha : IsCoatom a) : IsCoatom (a : α) :=
@IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ x a ha
theorem isCoatom_iff_ge_of_le : IsCoatom a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊤, a ≤ b → b ≤ a :=
isAtom_iff_le_of_ge (α := αᵒᵈ)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.lt_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a < x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem IsCoatom.le_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ ∨ x = a :=
h.dual.le_iff
lemma IsCoatom.lt_top (h : IsCoatom a) : a < ⊤ :=
h.lt_iff.mpr rfl
lemma IsCoatom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsCoatom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a ≤ b ↔ b = a := ha.dual.le_iff_eq hb
theorem IsCoatom.Ici_eq (h : IsCoatom a) : Set.Ici a = {⊤, a} :=
h.dual.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem covBy_top_iff : a ⋖ ⊤ ↔ IsCoatom a :=
toDual_covBy_toDual_iff.symm.trans bot_covBy_iff
alias ⟨CovBy.isCoatom, IsCoatom.covBy_top⟩ := covBy_top_iff
namespace SetLike
variable {A B : Type*} [SetLike A B]
theorem isAtom_iff [OrderBot A] {K : A} :
IsAtom K ↔ K ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ H g, H ≤ K → g ∉ H → g ∈ K → H = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [IsAtom, lt_iff_le_not_le, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists,
and_comm (a := _ ≤ _), and_imp, exists_imp, ← and_imp, and_comm]
theorem isCoatom_iff [OrderTop A] {K : A} :
IsCoatom K ↔ K ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → g ∉ K → g ∈ H → H = ⊤ := by
simp_rw [IsCoatom, lt_iff_le_not_le, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists,
and_comm (a := _ ≤ _), and_imp, exists_imp, ← and_imp, and_comm]
theorem covBy_iff {K L : A} :
K ⋖ L ↔ K < L ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → H ≤ L → g ∉ K → g ∈ H → H = L := by
refine and_congr_right fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun H ↦ not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_and_and_comm]
simp_rw [exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, ← and_assoc, and_comm, exists_and_left,
SetLike.not_le_iff_exists, and_comm, implies_true]
/-- Dual variant of `SetLike.covBy_iff` -/
theorem covBy_iff' {K L : A} :
K ⋖ L ↔ K < L ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → H ≤ L → g ∉ H → g ∈ L → H = K := by
refine and_congr_right fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun H ↦ not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_not_le, and_and_and_comm]
simp_rw [exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, ← and_assoc, and_comm, exists_and_left,
SetLike.not_le_iff_exists, ne_comm, implies_true]
end SetLike
end PartialOrder
theorem iInf_le_coatom [Order.Coframe α] {a : α} (ha : IsCoatom a) {f : ι → α} :
iInf f ≤ a ↔ ∃ i, f i ≤ a :=
atom_le_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
end IsCoatom
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
| Mathlib/Order/Atoms.lean | 231 | 231 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.Shift
/-! Shifting cochains
Let `C` be a preadditive category. Given two cochain complexes (indexed by `ℤ`),
the type of cochains `HomComplex.Cochain K L n` of degree `n` was introduced
in `Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex`. In this file, we
study how these cochains behave with respect to the shift on the complexes `K`
and `L`.
When `n`, `a`, `n'` are integers such that `h : n' + a = n`,
we obtain `rightShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' h : Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n'`.
This definition does not involve signs, but the analogous definition
of `leftShiftAddEquiv K L n a n' h' : Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'`
when `h' : n + a = n'` does involve signs, as we follow the conventions
appearing in the introduction of
[Brian Conrad's book *Grothendieck duality and base change*][conrad2000].
## References
* [Brian Conrad, Grothendieck duality and base change][conrad2000]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C] {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Linear R C]
{K L M : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n : ℤ}
namespace CochainComplex.HomComplex
namespace Cochain
variable (γ γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K L n)
/-- The map `Cochain K L n → Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n'` when `n' + a = n`. -/
def rightShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => γ.v p (p + n) rfl ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q (p + n) (by omega)).inv)
lemma rightShift_v (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n' = q)
(p' : ℤ) (hp' : p + n = p') :
(γ.rightShift a n' hn').v p q hpq = γ.v p p' hp' ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q p' (by rw [← hp', ← hpq, ← hn', add_assoc])).inv := by
subst hp'
dsimp only [rightShift]
simp only [mk_v]
/-- The map `Cochain K L n → Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'` when `n + a = n'`. -/
def leftShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => (a * n' + ((a * (a-1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p (p + a) rfl).hom ≫ γ.v (p+a) q (by omega))
lemma leftShift_v (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n' = q)
(p' : ℤ) (hp' : p' + n = q) :
(γ.leftShift a n' hn').v p q hpq = (a * n' + ((a * (a - 1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p p'
(by rw [← add_left_inj n, hp', add_assoc, add_comm a, hn', hpq])).hom ≫ γ.v p' q hp' := by
obtain rfl : p' = p + a := by omega
dsimp only [leftShift]
simp only [mk_v]
/-- The map `Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' → Cochain K L n` when `n' + a = n`. -/
def rightUnshift {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n) :
Cochain K L n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => γ.v p (p + n') rfl ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a (p + n') q (by rw [← hpq, add_assoc, hn])).hom)
lemma rightUnshift_v {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n' + a = n)
(p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (p' : ℤ) (hp' : p + n' = p') :
(γ.rightUnshift n hn).v p q hpq = γ.v p p' hp' ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p' q (by rw [← hpq, ← hn, ← add_assoc, hp'])).hom := by
subst hp'
dsimp only [rightUnshift]
simp only [mk_v]
/-- The map `Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' → Cochain K L n` when `n + a = n'`. -/
def leftUnshift {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n') :
Cochain K L n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => (a * n' + ((a * (a-1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a (p - a) p (by omega)).inv ≫ γ.v (p-a) q (by omega))
lemma leftUnshift_v {n' a : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn : n + a = n')
(p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (p' : ℤ) (hp' : p' + n' = q) :
(γ.leftUnshift n hn).v p q hpq = (a * n' + ((a * (a-1))/2)).negOnePow •
(K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p' p (by omega)).inv ≫ γ.v p' q (by omega) := by
obtain rfl : p' = p - a := by omega
rfl
/-- The map `Cochain K L n → Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n`. -/
def shift (a : ℤ) : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => (K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p _ rfl).hom ≫
γ.v (p + a) (q + a) (by omega) ≫ (L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q _ rfl).inv)
lemma shift_v (a : ℤ) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) (p' q' : ℤ)
(hp' : p' = p + a) (hq' : q' = q + a) :
(γ.shift a).v p q hpq = (K.shiftFunctorObjXIso a p p' hp').hom ≫
γ.v p' q' (by rw [hp', hq', ← hpq, add_assoc, add_comm a, add_assoc]) ≫
(L.shiftFunctorObjXIso a q q' hq').inv := by
subst hp' hq'
rfl
lemma shift_v' (a : ℤ) (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + n = q) :
(γ.shift a).v p q hpq = γ.v (p + a) (q + a) (by omega) := by
simp only [shift_v γ a p q hpq _ _ rfl rfl, shiftFunctor_obj_X, shiftFunctorObjXIso,
HomologicalComplex.XIsoOfEq_rfl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma rightUnshift_rightShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(γ.rightShift a n' hn').rightUnshift n hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [rightUnshift_v _ n hn' p q hpq (p + n') rfl,
γ.rightShift_v _ _ hn' p (p + n') rfl q hpq,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_rightUnshift {a n' : ℤ} (γ : Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n') (n : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(γ.rightUnshift n hn').rightShift a n' hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
simp only [(γ.rightUnshift n hn').rightShift_v a n' hn' p q hpq (p + n) rfl,
γ.rightUnshift_v n hn' p (p + n) rfl q hpq,
shiftFunctorObjXIso, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[simp]
lemma leftUnshift_leftShift (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(γ.leftShift a n' hn').leftUnshift n hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
rw [(γ.leftShift a n' hn').leftUnshift_v n hn' p q hpq (q-n') (by omega),
γ.leftShift_v a n' hn' (q-n') q (by omega) p hpq, Linear.comp_units_smul,
Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, smul_smul, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul]
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_leftUnshift {a n' : ℤ} (γ : Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n') (n : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(γ.leftUnshift n hn').leftShift a n' hn' = γ := by
ext p q hpq
rw [(γ.leftUnshift n hn').leftShift_v a n' hn' p q hpq (q-n) (by omega),
γ.leftUnshift_v n hn' (q-n) q (by omega) p hpq, Linear.comp_units_smul, smul_smul,
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul]
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_add (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
(γ₁ + γ₂).rightShift a n' hn' = γ₁.rightShift a n' hn' + γ₂.rightShift a n' hn' := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [rightShift_v _ a n' hn' p q hpq _ rfl, add_v, add_comp]
@[simp]
lemma leftShift_add (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
(γ₁ + γ₂).leftShift a n' hn' = γ₁.leftShift a n' hn' + γ₂.leftShift a n' hn' := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [leftShift_v _ a n' hn' p q hpq (p + a) (by omega), add_v, comp_add, smul_add]
@[simp]
lemma shift_add (a : ℤ) :
(γ₁ + γ₂).shift a = γ₁.shift a + γ₂.shift a := by
ext p q hpq
dsimp
simp only [shift_v', add_v]
variable (K L)
/-- The additive equivalence `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K L⟦a⟧ n'` when `n' + a = n`. -/
@[simps]
def rightShiftAddEquiv (n a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain K (L⟦a⟧) n' where
toFun γ := γ.rightShift a n' hn'
invFun γ := γ.rightUnshift n hn'
left_inv γ := by simp only [rightUnshift_rightShift]
right_inv γ := by simp only [rightShift_rightUnshift]
map_add' γ γ' := by simp only [rightShift_add]
/-- The additive equivalence `Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n'` when `n + a = n'`. -/
@[simps]
def leftShiftAddEquiv (n a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + a = n') :
Cochain K L n ≃+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) L n' where
toFun γ := γ.leftShift a n' hn'
invFun γ := γ.leftUnshift n hn'
left_inv γ := by simp only [leftUnshift_leftShift]
right_inv γ := by simp only [leftShift_leftUnshift]
map_add' γ γ' := by simp only [leftShift_add]
/-- The additive map `Cochain K L n →+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftAddHom (n a : ℤ) : Cochain K L n →+ Cochain (K⟦a⟧) (L⟦a⟧) n :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun γ => γ.shift a) (by intros; dsimp; simp only [shift_add])
|
variable (n)
@[simp]
lemma rightShift_zero (a n' : ℤ) (hn' : n' + a = n) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/HomComplexShift.lean | 196 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Finite
/-!
# Factorization of ideals and fractional ideals of Dedekind domains
Every nonzero ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product `∏_v v^{n_v}` over the
maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are natural numbers.
Similarly, every nonzero fractional ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product
`∏_v v^{n_v}` over the maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are integers. We define
`FractionalIdeal.count K v I` (abbreviated as `val_v(I)` in the documentation) to be `n_v`, and we
prove some of its properties. If `I = 0`, we define `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main definitions
- `FractionalIdeal.count` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of
`R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we
set `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main results
- `Ideal.finite_factors` : Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal.
- `Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : The ideal `I` equals the finprod
`∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, where `val_v(I)` denotes the multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`
and `v` runs over the maximal ideals of `R`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal,
`a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization'` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional
ideal, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal` : For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`,
the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finite_factors` : If `I ≠ 0`, then `val_v(I) = 0` for all but finitely many
maximal ideals of `R`.
## Implementation notes
Since we are only interested in the factorization of nonzero fractional ideals, we define
`val_v(0) = 0` so that every `val_v` is in `ℤ` and we can avoid having to use `WithTop ℤ`.
## Tags
dedekind domain, fractional ideal, ideal, factorization
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-! ### Factorization of ideals of Dedekind domains -/
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a maximal ideal `v` and an ideal `I` of `R`, `maxPowDividing` returns the maximal
power of `v` dividing `I`. -/
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
/-- Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal. -/
theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw)
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that the
multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`, denoted `val_v(I)`, is nonzero. -/
theorem Associates.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite,
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0 := by
have h_supp : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | ¬((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0} = {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I} := by
ext v
simp_rw [Int.natCast_eq_zero]
exact Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd hI v.irreducible
rw [Filter.eventually_cofinite, h_supp]
exact Ideal.finite_factors hI
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => v.maxPowDividing I).Finite :=
haveI h_subset : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 1} ⊆
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R |
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) ≠ 0} := by
intro v hv h_zero
have hv' : v.maxPowDividing I = 1 := by
rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, Int.natCast_eq_zero.mp h_zero,
pow_zero _]
exact hv hv'
Finite.subset (Filter.eventually_cofinite.mp (Associates.finite_factors hI)) h_subset
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))`, regarded as a fractional ideal, is not `(1)`. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [Ne, zpow_natCast, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^-(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_inv {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
(-((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ))).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [zpow_neg, Ne, inv_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport_coe hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, `v^(val_v(I) + 1)` does not divide `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_not_dvd (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) :
¬v.asIdeal ^ ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors + 1) ∣
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I := by
have hf := finite_mulSupport hI
have h_ne_zero : v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
rw [← mul_finprod_cond_ne v hf, pow_add, pow_one, finprod_cond_ne _ _ hf]
intro h_contr
have hv_prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw'⟩ :=
Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd hv_prime ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h_ne_zero).mp h_contr)
have hw_prime : Prime w.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime w.ne_bot w.isPrime
have hvw := Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow hv_prime hvw'
rw [Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated hv_prime hw_prime, associated_iff_eq] at hvw
exact (Finset.mem_erase.mp hw).1 (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw.symm)
end Ideal
theorem Associates.finprod_ne_zero (I : Ideal R) :
Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I) ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, finprod_def]
split_ifs
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro v _
apply pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
· exact one_ne_zero
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of `v` in `∏_v v^(val_v(I))` equals `val_v(I)`. -/
theorem finprod_count (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) : (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I)).factors =
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors := by
have h_ne_zero := Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := v.associates_irreducible
have h_dvd := finprod_mem_dvd v (Ideal.finite_mulSupport hI)
have h_not_dvd := Ideal.finprod_not_dvd v I hI
simp only [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing] at h_dvd h_ne_zero h_not_dvd
rw [← Associates.mk_dvd_mk] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [Associates.mk_pow, Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h_ne_zero hv] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [not_le] at h_not_dvd
apply Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ h_dvd h_not_dvd
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I = I := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq, ← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
classical
apply Associates.eq_of_eq_counts
· apply Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
· apply Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
intro v hv
obtain ⟨J, hJv⟩ := Associates.exists_rep v
rw [← hJv, Associates.irreducible_mk] at hv
rw [← hJv]
apply Ideal.finprod_count
⟨J, Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (irreducible_iff_prime.mp hv), Irreducible.ne_zero hv⟩ I hI
variable (K)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, when both sides are regarded as fractional
ideals of `R`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)) = I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization hI]
rw [FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_finprod R⁰ K (le_refl _)]
simp_rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow,
zpow_natCast]
end Ideal
/-! ### Factorization of fractional ideals of Dedekind domains -/
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Int IsLocalization
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) = I := by
have hJ_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have hJ := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K hJ_ne_zero
have ha_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have ha := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K ha_ne_zero
rw [haJ, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← hJ, ← ha,
← finprod_inv_distrib]
simp_rw [← zpow_neg]
rw [← finprod_mul_distrib (Ideal.finite_mulSupport_coe hJ_ne_zero)
(Ideal.finite_mulSupport_inv ha_ne_zero)]
apply finprod_congr
intro v
rw [← zpow_add₀ ((@coeIdeal_ne_zero R _ K _ _ _ _).mpr v.ne_bot), sub_eq_add_neg]
open scoped Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction {n : R} (hn : n ≠ 0) (d : ↥R⁰) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑d : R)}) :
Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) := by
have hd_ne_zero : (algebraMap R K) (d : R) ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ (IsFractionRing.injective R K) d.property
have h0 : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) ≠ 0 := by
rw [spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨(map_ne_zero_iff (algebraMap R K) (IsFractionRing.injective R K)).mpr hn, hd_ne_zero⟩
have hI : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) d)⁻¹ * ↑(Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R) := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
apply congr_arg
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
exact finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization h0 hI
open Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
| `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0)
(k : K) (hk : I = spanSingleton R⁰ k) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose
(mk'_surjective R⁰ k)} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑(choose
(choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)) : ↥R⁰) : R)}) : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = I := by
set n : R := choose (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)
set d : ↥R⁰ := choose (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hnd : mk' K n d = k := choose_spec (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
rw [← hnd, h, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, map_zero, zero_div, spanSingleton_zero] at hk
exact hI hk
rw [finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction hn0 d, hk, hnd]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 254 | 269 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ : ℝ) {r₂ : ℝ} (hr₂ : r₂ ≠ 0) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_ball_zero_iff,
map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r₁]
refine mul_lt_mul' hb ha (norm_nonneg _) (hr₂.lt_or_lt.resolve_left ?_)
exact ((apply_nonneg p b).trans hb).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
rcases eq_or_ne r₂ 0 with rfl | hr₂
· simp
· exact (smul_subset_smul_left (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _)).trans
(ball_smul_closedBall _ _ hr₂)
theorem closedBall_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
gcongr
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans ha
theorem neg_mem_ball_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ x ∈ ball p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_ball_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
theorem neg_mem_closedBall_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ x ∈ closedBall p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) : -ball p x r = ball p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_ball, mem_ball, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
-closedBall p x r = closedBall p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
end Module
end AddCommGroup
end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r : ℝ} {x : E}
theorem closedBall_iSup {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) (e : E)
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (⨆ i, p i) e r = ⋂ i, closedBall (p i) e r := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iSup_of_empty', iInter_of_empty, Seminorm.sSup_empty]
exact closedBall_bot _ hr
· ext x
have := Seminorm.bddAbove_range_iff.mp hp (x - e)
simp only [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter, Seminorm.iSup_apply hp, ciSup_le_iff this]
theorem ball_norm_mul_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) ⊆ k • p.ball 0 r := by
rcases eq_or_ne k 0 with (rfl | hk)
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, ball_eq_emptyset _ le_rfl]
exact empty_subset _
· intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_ball_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ←
mul_lt_mul_left <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk, ← mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖,
div_self (ne_of_gt <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self hk, one_smul]
theorem smul_ball_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
k • p.ball 0 r = p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
ext
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hk, p.mem_ball_zero, p.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul,
norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hk), mul_comm]
theorem smul_closedBall_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
k • p.closedBall 0 r ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, ← h, map_smul_eq_mul]
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
gcongr
theorem smul_closedBall_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : 0 < ‖k‖) :
k • p.closedBall 0 r = p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
refine subset_antisymm smul_closedBall_subset ?_
intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ← mul_le_mul_left hk, ← mul_assoc,
← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖, div_self (ne_of_gt hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self (norm_pos_iff.mp hk), one_smul]
theorem ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 < r₁) :
Absorbs 𝕜 (p.ball 0 r₁) (p.ball 0 r₂) := by
rcases exists_pos_lt_mul hr₁ r₂ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
refine .of_norm ⟨r, fun a ha x hx => ?_⟩
rw [smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr₀.trans_le ha), p.mem_ball_zero]
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hx
exact hx.trans (hr.trans_le <| by gcongr)
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p (0 : E) r) :=
absorbent_iff_forall_absorbs_singleton.2 fun _ =>
(p.ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr).mono_right <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 <| p.mem_ball_zero.2 <| lt_add_one _
|
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p (0 : E) r) :=
(p.absorbent_ball_zero hr).mono (p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 939 | 944 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Alena Gusakov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BitIndices
import Mathlib.Order.SupClosed
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Colexigraphic order
We define the colex order for finite sets, and give a couple of important lemmas and properties
relating to it.
The colex ordering likes to avoid large values: If the biggest element of `t` is bigger than all
elements of `s`, then `s < t`.
In the special case of `ℕ`, it can be thought of as the "binary" ordering. That is, order `s` based
on $∑_{i ∈ s} 2^i$. It's defined here on `Finset α` for any linear order `α`.
In the context of the Kruskal-Katona theorem, we are interested in how colex behaves for sets of a
fixed size. For example, for size 3, the colex order on ℕ starts
`012, 013, 023, 123, 014, 024, 124, 034, 134, 234, ...`
## Main statements
* Colex order properties - linearity, decidability and so on.
* `Finset.Colex.forall_lt_mono`: if `s < t` in colex, and everything in `t` is `< a`, then
everything in `s` is `< a`. This confirms the idea that an enumeration under colex will exhaust
all sets using elements `< a` before allowing `a` to be included.
* `Finset.toColex_image_le_toColex_image`: Strictly monotone functions preserve colex.
* `Finset.geomSum_le_geomSum_iff_toColex_le_toColex`: Colex for α = ℕ is the same as binary.
This also proves binary expansions are unique.
## See also
Related files are:
* `Data.List.Lex`: Lexicographic order on lists.
* `Data.Pi.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `Πₗ i, α i`.
* `Data.PSigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σ' i, α i`.
* `Data.Sigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σ i, α i`.
* `Data.Prod.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `α × β`.
## TODO
* Generalise `Colex.initSeg` so that it applies to `ℕ`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
colex, colexicographic, binary
-/
open Finset Function
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-- Type synonym of `Finset α` equipped with the colexicographic order rather than the inclusion
order. -/
@[ext]
structure Colex (α) where
/-- `toColex` is the "identity" function between `Finset α` and `Finset.Colex α`. -/
toColex ::
/-- `ofColex` is the "identity" function between `Finset.Colex α` and `Finset α`. -/
(ofColex : Finset α)
-- TODO: Why can't we export?
--export Colex (toColex)
open Colex
instance : Inhabited (Colex α) := ⟨⟨∅⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma toColex_ofColex (s : Colex α) : toColex (ofColex s) = s := rfl
lemma ofColex_toColex (s : Finset α) : ofColex (toColex s) = s := rfl
lemma toColex_inj {s t : Finset α} : toColex s = toColex t ↔ s = t := by simp
@[simp]
lemma ofColex_inj {s t : Colex α} : ofColex s = ofColex t ↔ s = t := by cases s; cases t; simp
lemma toColex_ne_toColex {s t : Finset α} : toColex s ≠ toColex t ↔ s ≠ t := by simp
lemma ofColex_ne_ofColex {s t : Colex α} : ofColex s ≠ ofColex t ↔ s ≠ t := by simp
lemma toColex_injective : Injective (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) := fun _ _ ↦ toColex_inj.1
lemma ofColex_injective : Injective (ofColex : Colex α → Finset α) := fun _ _ ↦ ofColex_inj.1
namespace Colex
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {f : α → β} {𝒜 𝒜₁ 𝒜₂ : Finset (Finset α)}
{s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
instance instLE : LE (Colex α) where
le s t := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b
-- TODO: This lemma is weirdly useful given how strange its statement is.
-- Is there a nicer statement? Should this lemma be made public?
private lemma trans_aux (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (htu : toColex t ≤ toColex u)
(has : a ∈ s) (hat : a ∉ t) : ∃ b, b ∈ u ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := by
classical
let s' : Finset α := {b ∈ s | b ∉ t ∧ a ≤ b}
have ⟨b, hb, hbmax⟩ := exists_maximal s' ⟨a, by simp [s', has, hat]⟩
simp only [s', mem_filter, and_imp] at hb hbmax
have ⟨c, hct, hcs, hbc⟩ := hst hb.1 hb.2.1
by_cases hcu : c ∈ u
· exact ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hb.2.2.trans hbc⟩
have ⟨d, hdu, hdt, hcd⟩ := htu hct hcu
have had : a ≤ d := hb.2.2.trans <| hbc.trans hcd
refine ⟨d, hdu, fun hds ↦ ?_, had⟩
exact hbmax d hds hdt had <| hbc.trans_lt <| hcd.lt_of_ne <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hct hdt
private lemma antisymm_aux (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (hts : toColex t ≤ toColex s) : s ⊆ t := by
intro a has
by_contra! hat
have ⟨_b, hb₁, hb₂, _⟩ := trans_aux hst hts has hat
exact hb₂ hb₁
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Colex α) where
le_refl _ _ ha ha' := (ha' ha).elim
le_antisymm _ _ hst hts := Colex.ext <| (antisymm_aux hst hts).antisymm (antisymm_aux hts hst)
le_trans s t u hst htu a has hau := by
by_cases hat : a ∈ ofColex t
· have ⟨b, hbu, hbt, hab⟩ := htu hat hau
by_cases hbs : b ∈ ofColex s
· have ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hbc⟩ := trans_aux hst htu hbs hbt
exact ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hab.trans hbc⟩
· exact ⟨b, hbu, hbs, hab⟩
· exact trans_aux hst htu has hat
lemma le_def {s t : Colex α} :
s ≤ t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
lemma toColex_le_toColex :
toColex s ≤ toColex t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t → ∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := Iff.rfl
lemma toColex_lt_toColex :
toColex s < toColex t ↔ s ≠ t ∧ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t → ∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := by
simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, toColex_le_toColex, and_comm]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then `s ≤ t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_mono : Monotone (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) :=
fun _s _t hst _a has hat ↦ (hat <| hst has).elim
/-- If `s ⊂ t`, then `s < t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_strictMono : StrictMono (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) :=
toColex_mono.strictMono_of_injective toColex_injective
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then `s ≤ t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_le_toColex_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : toColex s ≤ toColex t := toColex_mono h
/-- If `s ⊂ t`, then `s < t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_lt_toColex_of_ssubset (h : s ⊂ t) : toColex s < toColex t := toColex_strictMono h
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Colex α) where
bot := toColex ∅
bot_le s a ha := by cases ha
@[simp] lemma toColex_empty : toColex (∅ : Finset α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofColex_bot : ofColex (⊥ : Colex α) = ∅ := rfl
/-- If `s ≤ t` in colex, and all elements in `t` are small, then all elements in `s` are small. -/
lemma forall_le_mono (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (ht : ∀ b ∈ t, b ≤ a) : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a := by
rintro b hb
by_cases b ∈ t
· exact ht _ ‹_›
· obtain ⟨c, hct, -, hbc⟩ := hst hb ‹_›
exact hbc.trans <| ht _ hct
/-- If `s ≤ t` in colex, and all elements in `t` are small, then all elements in `s` are small. -/
lemma forall_lt_mono (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (ht : ∀ b ∈ t, b < a) : ∀ b ∈ s, b < a := by
rintro b hb
by_cases b ∈ t
· exact ht _ ‹_›
· obtain ⟨c, hct, -, hbc⟩ := hst hb ‹_›
exact hbc.trans_lt <| ht _ hct
/-- `s ≤ {a}` in colex iff all elements of `s` are strictly less than `a`, except possibly `a` in
which case `s = {a}`. -/
lemma toColex_le_singleton : toColex s ≤ toColex {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a ∧ (a ∈ s → b = a) := by
simp only [toColex_le_toColex, mem_singleton, and_assoc, exists_eq_left]
refine forall₂_congr fun b _ ↦ ?_; obtain rfl | hba := eq_or_ne b a <;> aesop
/-- `s < {a}` in colex iff all elements of `s` are strictly less than `a`. -/
lemma toColex_lt_singleton : toColex s < toColex {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b < a := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, toColex_le_singleton, toColex_ne_toColex]
refine ⟨fun h b hb ↦ (h.1 _ hb).1.lt_of_ne ?_,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun b hb ↦ ⟨(h _ hb).le, fun ha ↦ (lt_irrefl _ <| h _ ha).elim⟩, ?_⟩⟩ <;> rintro rfl
· refine h.2 <| eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hb, fun c hc ↦ (h.1 _ hc).2 hb⟩
· simp at h
/-- `{a} ≤ s` in colex iff `s` contains an element greater than or equal to `a`. -/
lemma singleton_le_toColex : (toColex {a} : Colex α) ≤ toColex s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, a ≤ x := by
simp [toColex_le_toColex]; by_cases a ∈ s <;> aesop
/-- Colex is an extension of the base order. -/
lemma singleton_le_singleton : (toColex {a} : Colex α) ≤ toColex {b} ↔ a ≤ b := by
| simp [toColex_le_singleton, eq_comm]
/-- Colex is an extension of the base order. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Colex.lean | 207 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 599 | 599 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
/-!
# Additional lemmas about elements of a ring satisfying `IsCoprime`
and elements of a monoid satisfying `IsRelPrime`
These lemmas are in a separate file to the definition of `IsCoprime` or `IsRelPrime`
as they require more imports.
Notably, this includes lemmas about `Finset.prod` as this requires importing BigOperators, and
lemmas about `Pow` since these are easiest to prove via `Finset.prod`.
-/
universe u v
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section IsCoprime
variable {R : Type u} {I : Type v} [CommSemiring R] {x y z : R} {s : I → R} {t : Finset I}
section
theorem Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {m n : ℤ} : IsCoprime m n ↔ Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, h⟩
refine Nat.dvd_one.mp (Int.gcd_dvd_iff.mpr ⟨a, b, ?_⟩)
rwa [mul_comm m, mul_comm n, eq_comm]
· rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, IsCoprime, Int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, mul_comm m, mul_comm n, Nat.cast_one]
intro h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
theorem Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime {m n : ℕ} : IsCoprime (m : ℤ) n ↔ Nat.Coprime m n := by
rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Int.gcd_natCast_natCast]
alias ⟨IsCoprime.nat_coprime, Nat.Coprime.isCoprime⟩ := Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime
theorem Nat.Coprime.cast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℕ} (h : Nat.Coprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_coprime] at h
rw [← Int.cast_natCast a, ← Int.cast_natCast b]
exact IsCoprime.intCast h
theorem ne_zero_or_ne_zero_of_nat_coprime {A : Type u} [CommRing A] [Nontrivial A] {a b : ℕ}
(h : Nat.Coprime a b) : (a : A) ≠ 0 ∨ (b : A) ≠ 0 :=
IsCoprime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero (R := A) <| by
simpa only [map_natCast] using IsCoprime.map (Nat.Coprime.isCoprime h) (Int.castRingHom A)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_left : (∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) x) → IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ ↦ isCoprime_one_left) fun b t hbt ih H ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at H
exact H.1.mul_left (ih H.2)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_right : (∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime x (s i)) → IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) := by
simpa only [isCoprime_comm] using IsCoprime.prod_left (R := R)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_left_iff : IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (iff_of_true isCoprime_one_left fun _ ↦ by simp) fun b t hbt ih ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt, IsCoprime.mul_left_iff, ih, Finset.forall_mem_insert]
theorem IsCoprime.prod_right_iff : IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime x (s i) := by
simpa only [isCoprime_comm] using IsCoprime.prod_left_iff (R := R)
theorem IsCoprime.of_prod_left (H1 : IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsCoprime (s i) x :=
IsCoprime.prod_left_iff.1 H1 i hit
theorem IsCoprime.of_prod_right (H1 : IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i)) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsCoprime x (s i) :=
IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.1 H1 i hit
-- Porting note: removed names of things due to linter, but they seem helpful
theorem Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime :
(t : Set I).Pairwise (IsCoprime on s) → (∀ i ∈ t, s i ∣ z) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x) ∣ z := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on t (fun _ _ ↦ one_dvd z)
(by
intro a r har ih Hs Hs1
rw [Finset.prod_insert har]
have aux1 : a ∈ (↑(insert a r) : Set I) := Finset.mem_insert_self a r
refine
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun i hir ↦
Hs aux1 (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hir) <| by
rintro rfl
exact har hir).mul_dvd
(Hs1 a aux1) (ih (Hs.mono ?_) fun i hi ↦ Hs1 i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
theorem Fintype.prod_dvd_of_coprime [Fintype I] (Hs : Pairwise (IsCoprime on s))
(Hs1 : ∀ i, s i ∣ z) : (∏ x, s x) ∣ z :=
Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime (Hs.set_pairwise _) fun i _ ↦ Hs1 i
end
open Finset
theorem exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime [DecidableEq I] (h : t.Nonempty) :
(∃ μ : I → R, (∑ i ∈ t, μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) = 1) ↔
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : t ↦ s i) := by
induction h using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton =>
simp [exists_apply_eq, Pairwise, Function.onFun]
| cons a t hat h ih =>
rw [pairwise_cons']
have mem : ∀ x ∈ t, a ∈ insert a t \ {x} := fun x hx ↦ by
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, fun ha ↦ hat (ha ▸ hx)⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨μ, hμ⟩
rw [sum_cons, cons_eq_insert, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, erase_insert hat] at hμ
refine ⟨ih.mp ⟨Pi.single h.choose (μ a * s h.choose) + μ * fun _ ↦ s a, ?_⟩, fun b hb ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton h.choose_spec, ← mul_assoc, ←
@if_pos _ _ h.choose_spec R (_ * _) 0, ← sum_pi_single', ← sum_add_distrib] at hμ
rw [← hμ, sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
dsimp -- Porting note: terms were showing as sort of `HAdd.hadd` instead of `+`
-- this whole proof pretty much breaks and has to be rewritten from scratch
rw [add_mul]
congr 1
· by_cases hx : x = h.choose
· rw [hx, Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, zero_mul]
· rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _, mul_comm]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
· have : IsCoprime (s b) (s a) :=
⟨μ a * ∏ i ∈ t \ {b}, s i, ∑ i ∈ t, μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j, ?_⟩
· exact ⟨this.symm, this⟩
rw [mul_assoc, ← prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul hb, sum_mul, ← hμ, sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
· rintro ⟨hs, Hb⟩
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ := ih.mpr hs
obtain ⟨u, v, huv⟩ := IsCoprime.prod_left fun b hb ↦ (Hb b hb).right
use fun i ↦ if i = a then u else v * μ i
have hμ' : (∑ i ∈ t, v * ((μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) * s a)) = v * s a := by
rw [← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, hμ, one_mul]
rw [sum_cons, cons_eq_insert, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, erase_insert hat]
simp only [↓reduceIte, ite_mul]
rw [← huv, ← hμ', sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [mul_assoc, if_neg fun ha : x = a ↦ hat (ha.casesOn hx)]
rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
theorem exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime' [Fintype I] [Nonempty I] [DecidableEq I] :
(∃ μ : I → R, (∑ i : I, μ i * ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, s j) = 1) ↔ Pairwise (IsCoprime on s) := by
convert exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime Finset.univ_nonempty (s := s) using 1
simp only [Function.onFun, pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_finset', coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem pairwise_coprime_iff_coprime_prod [DecidableEq I] :
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : t ↦ s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) (∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) := by
refine ⟨fun hp i hi ↦ IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.mpr fun j hj ↦ ?_, fun hp ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton] at hj
obtain ⟨hj, ji⟩ := hj
refine @hp ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ fun h ↦ ji (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm
-- Porting note: is there a better way compared to the old `congr_arg coe h`?
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h
apply IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.mp (hp i hi)
exact Finset.mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hj, fun f ↦ h <| Subtype.ext (Finset.mem_singleton.mp f).symm⟩
variable {m n : ℕ}
theorem IsCoprime.pow_left (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) y := by
rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsCoprime.prod_left fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem IsCoprime.pow_right (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime x (y ^ n) := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsCoprime.prod_right fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem IsCoprime.pow (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) (y ^ n) :=
H.pow_left.pow_right
theorem IsCoprime.pow_left_iff (hm : 0 < m) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) y ↔ IsCoprime x y := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, IsCoprime.pow_left⟩
rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const] at h
| exact h.of_prod_left 0 (Finset.mem_range.mpr hm)
theorem IsCoprime.pow_right_iff (hm : 0 < m) : IsCoprime x (y ^ m) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Lemmas.lean | 199 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
/-! # Power function on `ℂ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are complex numbers.
-/
open Real Topology Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
namespace Complex
/-- The complex power function `x ^ y`, given by `x ^ y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the
principal determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and
`0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : Pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨cpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def_of_ne_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℂ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
if_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff {x y : ℂ} :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or, ne_eq, not_not]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff_of_exponent_ne_zero {x y : ℂ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [cpow_def, *]
theorem zero_cpow_eq_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [cpow_def, eq_self_iff_true, if_true] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true] at hyp
right
exact ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [if_neg h] at hyp
left
exact ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_cpow h
· exact cpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_cpow_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : a = (0 : ℂ) ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_cpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp]
theorem one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [one_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def, ite_mul, boole_mul, mul_ite, mul_boole]
simp_all [exp_add, mul_add]
theorem cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc]
theorem cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [cpow_def, neg_eq_zero, mul_neg]
split_ifs <;> simp [exp_neg]
|
theorem cpow_sub {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cpow_add _ _ hx, cpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Complex.lean | 96 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules.
Given a fixed finite spanning set `b : ι → M` of an `R`-module `M`, we say that a matrix `M`
represents an endomorphism `f : M →ₗ[R] M` if the matrix as an endomorphism of `ι → R` commutes
with `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by `b`.
We show that every endomorphism has a matrix representation, and if `f.range ≤ I • ⊤` for some
ideal `I`, we may furthermore obtain a matrix representation whose entries fall in `I`.
This is used to conclude the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules over arbitrary rings.
-/
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
variable (b : ι → M)
open Polynomial Matrix
/-- The composition of a matrix (as an endomorphism of `ι → R`) with the projection
`(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromMatrix [DecidableEq ι] : Matrix ι ι R →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)).comp algEquivMatrix'.symm.toLinearMap
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A w = Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (j : ι) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A (Pi.single j 1) = ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i := by
rw [PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single]
simp_rw [MulOpposite.op_one, one_smul, transpose_apply]
/-- The endomorphisms of `M` acts on `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`, and takes the projection
to a `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromEnd : Module.End R M →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
LinearMap.lcomp _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply (f : Module.End R M) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f w = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (f : Module.End R M) (i : ι) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f (Pi.single i 1) = f (b i) := by
rw [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply_single, one_smul]
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_injective (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤) :
Function.Injective (PiToModule.fromEnd R b) := by
intro x y e
ext m
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : m ∈ LinearMap.range (Fintype.linearCombination R b) := by
rw [(Fintype.range_linearCombination R b).trans hb]
exact Submodule.mem_top
exact (LinearMap.congr_fun e m :)
section
variable {R} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- We say that a matrix represents an endomorphism of `M` if the matrix acting on `ι → R` is
equal to `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by a fixed (spanning) set. -/
def Matrix.Represents (A : Matrix ι ι R) (f : Module.End R M) : Prop :=
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A = PiToModule.fromEnd R b f
variable {b}
theorem Matrix.Represents.congr_fun {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(x) : Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
LinearMap.congr_fun h x
theorem Matrix.represents_iff {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔
∀ x, Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
⟨fun e x => e.congr_fun x, fun H => LinearMap.ext fun x => H x⟩
theorem Matrix.represents_iff' {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔ ∀ j, ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i = f (b j) := by
constructor
· intro h i
have := LinearMap.congr_fun h (Pi.single i 1)
rwa [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one, PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one] at this
· intro h
ext
simp_rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_single, PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one,
PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one]
apply h
theorem Matrix.Represents.mul {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A * A').Represents b (f * f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_mul]
ext
dsimp [PiToModule.fromEnd]
rw [← h'.congr_fun, ← h.congr_fun]
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.one : (1 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 1 := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_one]
ext
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.add {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A + A').Represents b (f + f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h h' ⊢; rw [map_add, map_add, h, h']
theorem Matrix.Represents.zero : (0 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 0 := by
delta Matrix.Represents
rw [map_zero, map_zero]
theorem Matrix.Represents.smul {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(r : R) : (r • A).Represents b (r • f) := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h ⊢
rw [map_smul, map_smul, h]
theorem Matrix.Represents.algebraMap (r : R) :
(algebraMap _ (Matrix ι ι R) r).Represents b (algebraMap _ (Module.End R M) r) := by
simpa only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] using Matrix.Represents.one.smul r
theorem Matrix.Represents.eq (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤)
{A : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : A.Represents b f') : f = f' :=
PiToModule.fromEnd_injective R b hb (h.symm.trans h')
variable (b R)
/-- The subalgebra of `Matrix ι ι R` that consists of matrices that actually represent
endomorphisms on `M`. -/
def Matrix.isRepresentation : Subalgebra R (Matrix ι ι R) where
carrier := { A | ∃ f : Module.End R M, A.Represents b f }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨f₁, e₁⟩ ⟨f₂, e₂⟩ => ⟨f₁ * f₂, e₁.mul e₂⟩
one_mem' := ⟨1, Matrix.Represents.one⟩
add_mem' := fun ⟨f₁, e₁⟩ ⟨f₂, e₂⟩ => ⟨f₁ + f₂, e₁.add e₂⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨0, Matrix.Represents.zero⟩
algebraMap_mem' r := ⟨algebraMap _ _ r, .algebraMap _⟩
variable (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤)
include hb
/-- The map sending a matrix to the endomorphism it represents. This is an `R`-algebra morphism. -/
noncomputable def Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd :
Matrix.isRepresentation R b →ₐ[R] Module.End R M where
toFun A := A.2.choose
map_one' := (1 : Matrix.isRepresentation R b).2.choose_spec.eq hb Matrix.Represents.one
map_mul' A₁ A₂ := (A₁ * A₂).2.choose_spec.eq hb (A₁.2.choose_spec.mul A₂.2.choose_spec)
map_zero' := (0 : Matrix.isRepresentation R b).2.choose_spec.eq hb Matrix.Represents.zero
map_add' A₁ A₂ := (A₁ + A₂).2.choose_spec.eq hb (A₁.2.choose_spec.add A₂.2.choose_spec)
commutes' r :=
(algebraMap _ (Matrix.isRepresentation R b) r).2.choose_spec.eq hb (.algebraMap r)
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_represents (A : Matrix.isRepresentation R b) :
(A : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b (Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb A) :=
A.2.choose_spec
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents (A : Matrix.isRepresentation R b)
{f : Module.End R M} (h : (A : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b f) :
Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb A = f :=
A.2.choose_spec.eq hb h
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal (f : Module.End R M) (I : Ideal R)
(hI : LinearMap.range f ≤ I • ⊤) :
∃ M, Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb M = f ∧ ∀ i j, M.1 i j ∈ I := by
have : ∀ x, f x ∈ LinearMap.range (Ideal.finsuppTotal ι M I b) := by
rw [Ideal.range_finsuppTotal, hb]
exact fun x => hI (LinearMap.mem_range_self f x)
choose bM' hbM' using this
let A : Matrix ι ι R := fun i j => bM' (b j) i
have : A.Represents b f := by
rw [Matrix.represents_iff']
dsimp [A]
intro j
specialize hbM' (b j)
rwa [Ideal.finsuppTotal_apply_eq_of_fintype] at hbM'
exact
⟨⟨A, f, this⟩, Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents R b hb ⟨A, f, this⟩ this,
fun i j => (bM' (b j) i).prop⟩
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_surjective :
Function.Surjective (Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb) := by
intro f
obtain ⟨M, e, -⟩ := Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal R b hb f ⊤ (by simp)
| exact ⟨M, e⟩
end
/-- The **Cayley-Hamilton Theorem** for f.g. modules over arbitrary rings states that for each
`R`-endomorphism `φ` of an `R`-module `M` such that `φ(M) ≤ I • M` for some ideal `I`, there
exists some `n` and some `aᵢ ∈ Iⁱ` such that `φⁿ + a₁ φⁿ⁻¹ + ⋯ + aₙ = 0`.
This is the version found in Eisenbud 4.3, which is slightly weaker than Matsumura 2.1
(this lacks the constraint on `n`), and is slightly stronger than Atiyah-Macdonald 2.4.
-/
theorem LinearMap.exists_monic_and_coeff_mem_pow_and_aeval_eq_zero_of_range_le_smul
[Module.Finite R M] (f : Module.End R M) (I : Ideal R) (hI : LinearMap.range f ≤ I • ⊤) :
∃ p : R[X], p.Monic ∧ (∀ k, p.coeff k ∈ I ^ (p.natDegree - k)) ∧ Polynomial.aeval f p = 0 := by
classical
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· exact ⟨0, Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton _, by simp⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/LinearMap.lean | 192 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
· apply le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (exp_pos 1).le hx0) (exp_nonneg x)
· have h := add_one_le_exp (log x)
rwa [← exp_le_exp, exp_add, exp_log (lt_of_not_le hx0), mul_comm] at h
theorem two_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : 2 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x < 0
· exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (by simp only [Nat.ofNat_nonneg]) hx0.le)
(exp_nonneg x)
· apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (le_of_not_lt hx0)) exp_one_mul_le_exp
have := Real.add_one_le_exp 1
rwa [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℝ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `log 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma log_div_self (x : ℝ) : log (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
@[gcongr, bound]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
@[bound]
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx).le).2 hx
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
@[bound]
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
@[bound]
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx.le, not_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-16")]
alias log_nonpos_iff' := log_nonpos_iff
@[bound]
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff hx).2 h'x
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
· rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
theorem log_le_sub_one_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ x - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le]
convert add_one_le_exp (log x)
rw [exp_log hx]
lemma one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 - x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
simpa [add_comm] using log_le_sub_one_of_pos (inv_pos.2 hx)
|
/-- See `Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 295 | 296 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,662 | 1,663 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file defines bundled ordered groups and develops a few basic results.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
/-
`NeZero` theory should not be needed at this point in the ordered algebraic hierarchy.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive IsOrderedAddMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) IsOrderedMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelMonoid
[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] : IsOrderedCancelMonoid α where
le_of_mul_le_mul_left a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
le_of_mul_le_mul_right a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
/-!
### Linearly ordered commutative groups
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative group is an
additive commutative group with a linear order in which
addition is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedAddCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group is a
commutative group with a linear order in which
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
attribute [nolint docBlame]
LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrder LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.toLinearOrder
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left]
theorem LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' (a b : α) (h : a < b) (c : α) : c * a < c * b :=
_root_.mul_lt_mul_left' h c
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_neg_eq]
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq' (h : a⁻¹ = a) : a = 1 :=
match lt_trichotomy a 1 with
| Or.inl h₁ =>
have : 1 < a := h ▸ one_lt_inv_of_inv h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
| Or.inr (Or.inl h₁) => h₁
| Or.inr (Or.inr h₁) =>
have : a < 1 := h ▸ inv_lt_one'.mpr h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
@[to_additive exists_zero_lt]
theorem exists_one_lt' [Nontrivial α] : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Decidable.exists_ne (1 : α)
obtain h|h := hy.lt_or_lt
· exact ⟨y⁻¹, one_lt_inv'.mpr h⟩
· exact ⟨y, h⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMaxOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a * y, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' a hy⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMinOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a / y, (div_lt_self_iff a).mpr hy⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [inv_le_iff_one_le_mul']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_self_iff : a⁻¹ < a ↔ 1 < a := by simp [inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_self_iff : a ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_self_iff : a < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section NormNumLemmas
/- The following lemmas are stated so that the `norm_num` tactic can use them with the
expected signatures. -/
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_le_neg]
theorem inv_le_inv' : a ≤ b → b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
inv_le_inv_iff.mpr
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_lt_neg]
theorem inv_lt_inv' : a < b → b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ :=
inv_lt_inv_iff.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_one_of_one_lt : 1 < a → a⁻¹ < 1 :=
inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_one_of_one_le : 1 ≤ a → a⁻¹ ≤ 1 :=
inv_le_one'.mpr
@[to_additive neg_nonneg_of_nonpos]
theorem one_le_inv_of_le_one : a ≤ 1 → 1 ≤ a⁻¹ :=
one_le_inv'.mpr
end NormNumLemmas
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 280 | 281 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,435 | 2,436 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.FreimanHom
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.Scalar
/-!
# Sets without arithmetic progressions of length three and Roth numbers
This file defines sets without arithmetic progressions of length three, aka 3AP-free sets, and the
Roth number of a set.
The corresponding notion, sets without geometric progressions of length three, are called 3GP-free
sets.
The Roth number of a finset is the size of its biggest 3AP-free subset. This is a more general
definition than the one often found in mathematical literature, where the `n`-th Roth number is
the size of the biggest 3AP-free subset of `{0, ..., n - 1}`.
## Main declarations
* `ThreeGPFree`: Predicate for a set to be 3GP-free.
* `ThreeAPFree`: Predicate for a set to be 3AP-free.
* `mulRothNumber`: The multiplicative Roth number of a finset.
* `addRothNumber`: The additive Roth number of a finset.
* `rothNumberNat`: The Roth number of a natural, namely `addRothNumber (Finset.range n)`.
## TODO
* Can `threeAPFree_iff_eq_right` be made more general?
* Generalize `ThreeGPFree.image` to Freiman homs
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Roth, arithmetic progression, average, three-free
-/
assert_not_exists Field Ideal TwoSidedIdeal
open Finset Function
open scoped Pointwise
variable {F α β : Type*}
section ThreeAPFree
open Set
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] (s t : Set α)
/-- A set is **3GP-free** if it does not contain any non-trivial geometric progression of length
three. -/
@[to_additive "A set is **3AP-free** if it does not contain any non-trivial arithmetic progression
of length three.
This is also sometimes called a **non averaging set** or **Salem-Spencer set**."]
def ThreeGPFree : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → a = b
/-- Whether a given finset is 3GP-free is decidable. -/
@[to_additive "Whether a given finset is 3AP-free is decidable."]
instance ThreeGPFree.instDecidable [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} :
Decidable (ThreeGPFree (s : Set α)) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ s, a * c = b * b → a = b) Iff.rfl
variable {s t}
@[to_additive]
theorem ThreeGPFree.mono (h : t ⊆ s) (hs : ThreeGPFree s) : ThreeGPFree t :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ hc ↦ hs (h ha) (h hb) (h hc)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem threeGPFree_empty : ThreeGPFree (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ ha => ha.elim
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.Subsingleton.threeGPFree (hs : s.Subsingleton) : ThreeGPFree s :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ _ _ ↦ hs ha hb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem threeGPFree_singleton (a : α) : ThreeGPFree ({a} : Set α) :=
subsingleton_singleton.threeGPFree
@[to_additive ThreeAPFree.prod]
theorem ThreeGPFree.prod {t : Set β} (hs : ThreeGPFree s) (ht : ThreeGPFree t) :
ThreeGPFree (s ×ˢ t) := fun _ ha _ hb _ hc h ↦
Prod.ext (hs ha.1 hb.1 hc.1 (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).1) (ht ha.2 hb.2 hc.2 (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).2)
@[to_additive]
theorem threeGPFree_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(hs : ∀ i, ThreeGPFree (s i)) : ThreeGPFree ((univ : Set ι).pi s) :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ hc h ↦
funext fun i => hs i (ha i trivial) (hb i trivial) (hc i trivial) <| congr_fun h i
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] {s A : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms."]
lemma ThreeGPFree.of_image (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 s t f) (hf' : s.InjOn f) (hAs : A ⊆ s)
(hA : ThreeGPFree (f '' A)) : ThreeGPFree A :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ hc habc ↦ hf' (hAs ha) (hAs hb) <| hA (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
(mem_image_of_mem _ hb) (mem_image_of_mem _ hc) <|
hf.mul_eq_mul (hAs ha) (hAs hc) (hAs hb) (hAs hb) habc
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms."]
lemma threeGPFree_image (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 s t f) (hAs : A ⊆ s) :
ThreeGPFree (f '' A) ↔ ThreeGPFree A := by
rw [ThreeGPFree, ThreeGPFree]
have := (hf.bijOn.injOn.mono hAs).bijOn_image (f := f)
simp +contextual only
[((hf.bijOn.injOn.mono hAs).bijOn_image (f := f)).forall,
hf.mul_eq_mul (hAs _) (hAs _) (hAs _) (hAs _), this.injOn.eq_iff]
@[to_additive] alias ⟨_, ThreeGPFree.image⟩ := threeGPFree_image
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are reflected under `2`-Freiman homomorphisms."]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.threeGPFree (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 s t f) (hf' : s.InjOn f)
(ht : ThreeGPFree t) : ThreeGPFree s :=
(ht.mono hf.mapsTo.image_subset).of_image hf hf' subset_rfl
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are unchanged under `2`-Freiman isomorphisms."]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.threeGPFree_congr (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 s t f) :
ThreeGPFree s ↔ ThreeGPFree t := by
rw [← threeGPFree_image hf subset_rfl, hf.bijOn.image_eq]
/-- Geometric progressions of length three are preserved under semigroup homomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive
"Arithmetic progressions of length three are preserved under semigroup homomorphisms."]
theorem ThreeGPFree.image' [FunLike F α β] [MulHomClass F α β] (f : F) (hf : (s * s).InjOn f)
(h : ThreeGPFree s) : ThreeGPFree (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ habc
rw [h ha hb hc (hf (mul_mem_mul ha hc) (mul_mem_mul hb hb) <| by rwa [map_mul, map_mul])]
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [IsCancelMul α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive] lemma ThreeGPFree.eq_right (hs : ThreeGPFree s) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → b = c := by
rintro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl := hs ha hb hc habc
simpa using habc.symm
@[to_additive] lemma threeGPFree_insert :
ThreeGPFree (insert a s) ↔ ThreeGPFree s ∧
(∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → a = b) ∧
∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → b * c = a * a → b = a := by
refine ⟨fun hs ↦ ⟨hs.mono (subset_insert _ _),
fun b hb c hc ↦ hs (Or.inl rfl) (Or.inr hb) (Or.inr hc),
fun b hb c hc ↦ hs (Or.inr hb) (Or.inl rfl) (Or.inr hc)⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ha, ha'⟩ b hb c hc d hd h
rw [mem_insert_iff] at hb hc hd
obtain rfl | hb := hb <;> obtain rfl | hc := hc
· rfl
all_goals obtain rfl | hd := hd
· exact (ha' hc hc h.symm).symm
· exact ha hc hd h
· exact mul_right_cancel h
· exact ha' hb hd h
· obtain rfl := ha hc hb ((mul_comm _ _).trans h)
exact ha' hb hc h
· exact hs hb hc hd h
@[to_additive]
theorem ThreeGPFree.smul_set (hs : ThreeGPFree s) : ThreeGPFree (a • s) := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩ h
exact congr_arg (a • ·) <| hs hb hc hd <| by simpa [mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ a] using h
@[to_additive] lemma threeGPFree_smul_set : ThreeGPFree (a • s) ↔ ThreeGPFree s where
mp hs b hb c hc d hd h := mul_left_cancel
(hs (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) (mem_image_of_mem _ hc) (mem_image_of_mem _ hd) <| by
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_mul_mul_comm, h])
mpr := ThreeGPFree.smul_set
end CancelCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem threeGPFree_insert_of_lt (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, i < a) :
ThreeGPFree (insert a s) ↔
ThreeGPFree s ∧ ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a * c = b * b → a = b := by
refine threeGPFree_insert.trans ?_
rw [← and_assoc]
exact and_iff_left fun b hb c hc h => ((mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hs _ hb) (hs _ hc)).ne h).elim
end OrderedCancelCommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NoZeroDivisors α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
lemma ThreeGPFree.smul_set₀ (hs : ThreeGPFree s) (ha : a ≠ 0) : ThreeGPFree (a • s) := by
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩ h
exact congr_arg (a • ·) <| hs hb hc hd <| by simpa [mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ a, ha] using h
theorem threeGPFree_smul_set₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : ThreeGPFree (a • s) ↔ ThreeGPFree s :=
⟨fun hs b hb c hc d hd h ↦
mul_left_cancel₀ ha
(hs (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hb) (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hc) (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hd) <| by
rw [smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, mul_mul_mul_comm, h, mul_mul_mul_comm]),
fun hs => hs.smul_set₀ ha⟩
end CancelCommMonoidWithZero
section Nat
theorem threeAPFree_iff_eq_right {s : Set ℕ} :
ThreeAPFree s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → ∀ ⦃c⦄, c ∈ s → a + c = b + b → a = c := by
refine forall₄_congr fun a _ha b hb => forall₃_congr fun c hc habc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact (add_left_cancel habc).symm
· rintro rfl
simp_rw [← two_mul] at habc
exact mul_left_cancel₀ two_ne_zero habc
end Nat
end ThreeAPFree
open Finset
section RothNumber
variable [DecidableEq α]
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [DecidableEq β] [Monoid β] (s t : Finset α)
/-- The multiplicative Roth number of a finset is the cardinality of its biggest 3GP-free subset. -/
@[to_additive "The additive Roth number of a finset is the cardinality of its biggest 3AP-free
subset.
The usual Roth number corresponds to `addRothNumber (Finset.range n)`, see `rothNumberNat`."]
def mulRothNumber : Finset α →o ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ Nat.findGreatest (fun m ↦ ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = m ∧ ThreeGPFree (t : Set α)) #s, by
rintro t u htu
refine Nat.findGreatest_mono (fun m => ?_) (card_le_card htu)
rintro ⟨v, hvt, hv⟩
exact ⟨v, hvt.trans htu, hv⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mulRothNumber_le : mulRothNumber s ≤ #s := Nat.findGreatest_le #s
@[to_additive]
theorem mulRothNumber_spec :
∃ t ⊆ s, #t = mulRothNumber s ∧ ThreeGPFree (t : Set α) :=
Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun m ↦ ∃ t ⊆ s, #t = m ∧ ThreeGPFree (t : Set α))
(Nat.zero_le _) ⟨∅, empty_subset _, card_empty, by norm_cast; exact threeGPFree_empty⟩
variable {s t} {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem ThreeGPFree.le_mulRothNumber (hs : ThreeGPFree (s : Set α)) (h : s ⊆ t) :
#s ≤ mulRothNumber t :=
Nat.le_findGreatest (card_le_card h) ⟨s, h, rfl, hs⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ThreeGPFree.mulRothNumber_eq (hs : ThreeGPFree (s : Set α)) :
mulRothNumber s = #s :=
(mulRothNumber_le _).antisymm <| hs.le_mulRothNumber <| Subset.refl _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRothNumber_empty : mulRothNumber (∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| (mulRothNumber_le _).trans card_empty.le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRothNumber_singleton (a : α) : mulRothNumber ({a} : Finset α) = 1 := by
refine ThreeGPFree.mulRothNumber_eq ?_
rw [coe_singleton]
exact threeGPFree_singleton a
@[to_additive]
theorem mulRothNumber_union_le (s t : Finset α) :
mulRothNumber (s ∪ t) ≤ mulRothNumber s + mulRothNumber t :=
let ⟨u, hus, hcard, hu⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec (s ∪ t)
calc
mulRothNumber (s ∪ t) = #u := hcard.symm
_ = #(u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := by rw [← inter_union_distrib_left, inter_eq_left.2 hus]
_ ≤ #(u ∩ s) + #(u ∩ t) := card_union_le _ _
_ ≤ mulRothNumber s + mulRothNumber t := _root_.add_le_add
((hu.mono inter_subset_left).le_mulRothNumber inter_subset_right)
((hu.mono inter_subset_left).le_mulRothNumber inter_subset_right)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mulRothNumber_product (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
mulRothNumber s * mulRothNumber t ≤ mulRothNumber (s ×ˢ t) := by
obtain ⟨u, hus, hucard, hu⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec s
obtain ⟨v, hvt, hvcard, hv⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec t
rw [← hucard, ← hvcard, ← card_product]
refine ThreeGPFree.le_mulRothNumber ?_ (product_subset_product hus hvt)
rw [coe_product]
exact hu.prod hv
@[to_additive]
theorem mulRothNumber_lt_of_forall_not_threeGPFree
(h : ∀ t ∈ powersetCard n s, ¬ThreeGPFree ((t : Finset α) : Set α)) :
mulRothNumber s < n := by
obtain ⟨t, hts, hcard, ht⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec s
rw [← hcard, ← not_le]
intro hn
obtain ⟨u, hut, rfl⟩ := exists_subset_card_eq hn
exact h _ (mem_powersetCard.2 ⟨hut.trans hts, rfl⟩) (ht.mono hut)
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] [DecidableEq β] {A : Finset α} {B : Finset β} {f : α → β}
/-- Arithmetic progressions can be pushed forward along bijective 2-Freiman homs. -/
@[to_additive "Arithmetic progressions can be pushed forward along bijective 2-Freiman homs."]
lemma IsMulFreimanHom.mulRothNumber_mono (hf : IsMulFreimanHom 2 A B f) (hf' : Set.BijOn f A B) :
mulRothNumber B ≤ mulRothNumber A := by
obtain ⟨s, hsB, hcard, hs⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec B
have hsA : invFunOn f A '' s ⊆ A :=
(hf'.surjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn.mono (coe_subset.2 hsB) Subset.rfl).image_subset
have hfsA : Set.SurjOn f A s := hf'.surjOn.mono Subset.rfl (coe_subset.2 hsB)
rw [← hcard, ← s.card_image_of_injOn ((invFunOn_injOn_image f _).mono hfsA)]
refine ThreeGPFree.le_mulRothNumber ?_ (mod_cast hsA)
rw [coe_image]
simpa using (hf.subset hsA hfsA.bijOn_subset.mapsTo).threeGPFree (hf'.injOn.mono hsA) hs
/-- Arithmetic progressions are preserved under 2-Freiman isos. -/
@[to_additive "Arithmetic progressions are preserved under 2-Freiman isos."]
lemma IsMulFreimanIso.mulRothNumber_congr (hf : IsMulFreimanIso 2 A B f) :
mulRothNumber A = mulRothNumber B := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (hf.isMulFreimanHom.mulRothNumber_mono hf.bijOn)
obtain ⟨s, hsA, hcard, hs⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec A
rw [← coe_subset] at hsA
have hfs : Set.InjOn f s := hf.bijOn.injOn.mono hsA
have := (hf.subset hsA hfs.bijOn_image).threeGPFree_congr.1 hs
rw [← coe_image] at this
rw [← hcard, ← Finset.card_image_of_injOn hfs]
refine this.le_mulRothNumber ?_
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image]
exact (hf.bijOn.mapsTo.mono hsA Subset.rfl).image_subset
end CommMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) (a : α)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRothNumber_map_mul_left :
mulRothNumber (s.map <| mulLeftEmbedding a) = mulRothNumber s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· obtain ⟨u, hus, hcard, hu⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec (s.map <| mulLeftEmbedding a)
rw [subset_map_iff] at hus
obtain ⟨u, hus, rfl⟩ := hus
rw [coe_map] at hu
rw [← hcard, card_map]
exact (threeGPFree_smul_set.1 hu).le_mulRothNumber hus
· obtain ⟨u, hus, hcard, hu⟩ := mulRothNumber_spec s
have h : ThreeGPFree (u.map <| mulLeftEmbedding a : Set α) := by rw [coe_map]; exact hu.smul_set
convert h.le_mulRothNumber (map_subset_map.2 hus) using 1
rw [card_map, hcard]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulRothNumber_map_mul_right :
mulRothNumber (s.map <| mulRightEmbedding a) = mulRothNumber s := by
rw [← mulLeftEmbedding_eq_mulRightEmbedding, mulRothNumber_map_mul_left s a]
end CancelCommMonoid
end RothNumber
section rothNumberNat
variable {k n : ℕ}
/-- The Roth number of a natural `N` is the largest integer `m` for which there is a subset of
`range N` of size `m` with no arithmetic progression of length 3.
Trivially, `rothNumberNat N ≤ N`, but Roth's theorem (proved in 1953) shows that
`rothNumberNat N = o(N)` and the construction by Behrend gives a lower bound of the form
`N * exp(-C sqrt(log(N))) ≤ rothNumberNat N`.
A significant refinement of Roth's theorem by Bloom and Sisask announced in 2020 gives
`rothNumberNat N = O(N / (log N)^(1+c))` for an absolute constant `c`. -/
def rothNumberNat : ℕ →o ℕ :=
⟨fun n => addRothNumber (range n), addRothNumber.mono.comp range_mono⟩
theorem rothNumberNat_def (n : ℕ) : rothNumberNat n = addRothNumber (range n) :=
rfl
theorem rothNumberNat_le (N : ℕ) : rothNumberNat N ≤ N :=
(addRothNumber_le _).trans (card_range _).le
theorem rothNumberNat_spec (n : ℕ) :
∃ t ⊆ range n, #t = rothNumberNat n ∧ ThreeAPFree (t : Set ℕ) :=
addRothNumber_spec _
/-- A verbose specialization of `threeAPFree.le_addRothNumber`, sometimes convenient in
practice. -/
theorem ThreeAPFree.le_rothNumberNat (s : Finset ℕ) (hs : ThreeAPFree (s : Set ℕ))
(hsn : ∀ x ∈ s, x < n) (hsk : #s = k) : k ≤ rothNumberNat n :=
hsk.ge.trans <| hs.le_addRothNumber fun x hx => mem_range.2 <| hsn x hx
/-- The Roth number is a subadditive function. Note that by Fekete's lemma this shows that
the limit `rothNumberNat N / N` exists, but Roth's theorem gives the stronger result that this
limit is actually `0`. -/
theorem rothNumberNat_add_le (M N : ℕ) :
rothNumberNat (M + N) ≤ rothNumberNat M + rothNumberNat N := by
simp_rw [rothNumberNat_def]
rw [range_add_eq_union, ← addRothNumber_map_add_left (range N) M]
exact addRothNumber_union_le _ _
@[simp]
theorem rothNumberNat_zero : rothNumberNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
theorem addRothNumber_Ico (a b : ℕ) : addRothNumber (Ico a b) = rothNumberNat (b - a) := by
obtain h | h := le_total b a
· rw [Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, rothNumberNat_zero, addRothNumber_empty]
convert addRothNumber_map_add_left _ a
rw [range_eq_Ico, map_eq_image]
convert (image_add_left_Ico 0 (b - a) _).symm
exact (add_tsub_cancel_of_le h).symm
lemma Fin.addRothNumber_eq_rothNumberNat (hkn : 2 * k ≤ n) :
addRothNumber (Iio k : Finset (Fin n.succ)) = rothNumberNat k :=
IsAddFreimanIso.addRothNumber_congr <| mod_cast isAddFreimanIso_Iio two_ne_zero hkn
|
lemma Fin.addRothNumber_le_rothNumberNat (k n : ℕ) (hkn : k ≤ n) :
addRothNumber (Iio k : Finset (Fin n.succ)) ≤ rothNumberNat k := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Defs.lean | 446 | 448 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Coinductive formalization of unbounded computations.
This file provides a `Computation` type where `Computation α` is the type of
unbounded computations returning `α`.
-/
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive Computation (α : Type u) : Type u
| pure : α → Computation α
| think : Computation α → Computation α
-/
/-- `Computation α` is the type of unbounded computations returning `α`.
An element of `Computation α` is an infinite sequence of `Option α` such
that if `f n = some a` for some `n` then it is constantly `some a` after that. -/
def Computation (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // ∀ ⦃n a⦄, f n = some a → f (n + 1) = some a }
namespace Computation
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- constructors
/-- `pure a` is the computation that immediately terminates with result `a`. -/
def pure (a : α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const (some a), fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : CoeTC α (Computation α) :=
⟨pure⟩
-- note [use has_coe_t]
/-- `think c` is the computation that delays for one "tick" and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def think (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.cons none c.1, fun n a h => by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
· exact c.2 h⟩
/-- `thinkN c n` is the computation that delays for `n` ticks and then performs
computation `c`. -/
def thinkN (c : Computation α) : ℕ → Computation α
| 0 => c
| n + 1 => think (thinkN c n)
-- check for immediate result
/-- `head c` is the first step of computation, either `some a` if `c = pure a`
or `none` if `c = think c'`. -/
def head (c : Computation α) : Option α :=
c.1.head
-- one step of computation
/-- `tail c` is the remainder of computation, either `c` if `c = pure a`
or `c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def tail (c : Computation α) : Computation α :=
⟨c.1.tail, fun _ _ h => c.2 h⟩
/-- `empty α` is the computation that never returns, an infinite sequence of
`think`s. -/
def empty (α) : Computation α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : Inhabited (Computation α) :=
⟨empty _⟩
/-- `runFor c n` evaluates `c` for `n` steps and returns the result, or `none`
if it did not terminate after `n` steps. -/
def runFor : Computation α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
/-- `destruct c` is the destructor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
It returns `inl a` if `c = pure a` and `inr c'` if `c = think c'`. -/
def destruct (c : Computation α) : α ⊕ (Computation α) :=
match c.1 0 with
| none => Sum.inr (tail c)
| some a => Sum.inl a
/-- `run c` is an unsound meta function that runs `c` to completion, possibly
resulting in an infinite loop in the VM. -/
unsafe def run : Computation α → α
| c =>
match destruct c with
| Sum.inl a => a
| Sum.inr ca => run ca
theorem destruct_eq_pure {s : Computation α} {a : α} : destruct s = Sum.inl a → s = pure a := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with _ <;> intro h
· contradiction
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
· injection h with h'
rwa [h'] at f0
· exact s.2 IH
theorem destruct_eq_think {s : Computation α} {s'} : destruct s = Sum.inr s' → s = think s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : s.1 0 with a' <;> intro h
· injection h with h'
rw [← h']
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [think, tail]
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
· contradiction
@[simp]
theorem destruct_pure (a : α) : destruct (pure a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think : ∀ s : Computation α, destruct (think s) = Sum.inr s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_empty : destruct (empty α) = Sum.inr (empty α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pure (a : α) : head (pure a) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : Computation α) : head (think s) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_empty : head (empty α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_pure (a : α) : tail (pure a) = pure a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : Computation α) : tail (think s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s; apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, think]
@[simp]
theorem tail_empty : tail (empty α) = empty α :=
rfl
theorem think_empty : empty α = think (empty α) :=
destruct_eq_think destruct_empty
/-- Recursion principle for computations, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} (s : Computation α) (h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
match H : destruct s with
| Sum.inl v => by
rw [destruct_eq_pure H]
apply h1
| Sum.inr v => match v with
| ⟨a, s'⟩ => by
rw [destruct_eq_think H]
apply h2
/-- Corecursor constructor for `corec` -/
def Corec.f (f : β → α ⊕ β) : α ⊕ β → Option α × (α ⊕ β)
| Sum.inl a => (some a, Sum.inl a)
| Sum.inr b =>
(match f b with
| Sum.inl a => some a
| Sum.inr _ => none,
f b)
/-- `corec f b` is the corecursor for `Computation α` as a coinductive type.
If `f b = inl a` then `corec f b = pure a`, and if `f b = inl b'` then
`corec f b = think (corec f b')`. -/
def corec (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : Computation α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b), fun n a' h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (Sum.inr b)).2 n = some a'
revert h; generalize Sum.inr b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = some a' → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = some a'
rcases o with _ | b <;> intro h
· exact h
unfold Corec.f at *; split <;> simp_all
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
/-- left map of `⊕` -/
def lmap (f : α → β) : α ⊕ γ → β ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl (f a)
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr b
/-- right map of `⊕` -/
def rmap (f : β → γ) : α ⊕ β → α ⊕ γ
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl a
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr (f b)
attribute [simp] lmap rmap
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → α ⊕ β) (b : β) : destruct (corec f b) = rmap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Sum.inr b) 0 =
Sum.rec Option.some (fun _ ↦ none) (f b) by
dsimp [Corec.f, Stream'.corec', Stream'.corec, Stream'.map, Stream'.get, Stream'.iterate]
match (f b) with
| Sum.inl x => rfl
| Sum.inr x => rfl
]
induction' h : f b with a b'; · rfl
dsimp [Corec.f, destruct]
apply congr_arg; apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Computation α → Computation α → Prop)
/-- bisimilarity relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity over a sum of `Computation`s -/
def BisimO : α ⊕ (Computation α) → α ⊕ (Computation α) → Prop
| Sum.inl a, Sum.inl a' => a = a'
| Sum.inr s, Sum.inr s' => R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- Attribute expressing bisimilarity over two `Computation`s -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two computations are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Computation α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ =>
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s; rfl, by cases s'; rfl, r⟩) this
have h := bisim r; revert r h
apply recOn s _ _ <;> intro r' <;> apply recOn s' _ _ <;> intro a' r h
· constructor <;> dsimp at h
· rw [h]
· rw [h] at r
rw [tail_pure, tail_pure,h]
assumption
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· rw [destruct_pure, destruct_think] at h
exact False.elim h
· simp_all
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
-- It's more of a stretch to use ∈ for this relation, but it
-- asserts that the computation limits to the given value.
/-- Assertion that a `Computation` limits to a given value -/
protected def Mem (s : Computation α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Computation α) :=
⟨Computation.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Computation α) {a m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.1 m = some a → s.1 n = some a := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
theorem mem_unique {s : Computation α} {a b : α} : a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b
| ⟨m, ha⟩, ⟨n, hb⟩ => by
injection
(le_stable s (le_max_left m n) ha.symm).symm.trans (le_stable s (le_max_right m n) hb.symm)
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Computation α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
/-- `Terminates s` asserts that the computation `s` eventually terminates with some value. -/
class Terminates (s : Computation α) : Prop where
/-- assertion that there is some term `a` such that the `Computation` terminates -/
term : ∃ a, a ∈ s
theorem terminates_iff (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h.1, Terminates.mk⟩
theorem terminates_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates s :=
⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
theorem terminates_def (s : Computation α) : Terminates s ↔ ∃ n, (s.1 n).isSome :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ =>
⟨n, by
dsimp [Stream'.get] at h
rw [← h]
exact rfl⟩,
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨⟨Option.get _ h, n, (Option.eq_some_of_isSome h).symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem ret_mem (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
theorem eq_of_pure_mem {a a' : α} (h : a' ∈ pure a) : a' = a :=
mem_unique h (ret_mem _)
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure_iff (a b : α) : a ∈ pure b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_pure_mem, fun h => h ▸ ret_mem _⟩
instance ret_terminates (a : α) : Terminates (pure a) :=
terminates_of_mem (ret_mem _)
theorem think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ s → a ∈ think s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨n + 1, h⟩
instance think_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s], Terminates (think s)
| ⟨⟨a, n, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, n + 1, h⟩⟩
theorem of_think_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : a ∈ think s → a ∈ s
| ⟨n, h⟩ => by
rcases n with - | n'
· contradiction
· exact ⟨n', h⟩
theorem of_think_terminates {s : Computation α} : Terminates (think s) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, of_think_mem h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ empty α := fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by contradiction
theorem not_terminates_empty : ¬Terminates (empty α) := fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => not_mem_empty a h
theorem eq_empty_of_not_terminates {s} (H : ¬Terminates s) : s = empty α := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
induction' h : s.val n with _; · rfl
refine absurd ?_ H; exact ⟨⟨_, _, h.symm⟩⟩
theorem thinkN_mem {s : Computation α} {a} : ∀ n, a ∈ thinkN s n ↔ a ∈ s
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| n + 1 => Iff.trans ⟨of_think_mem, think_mem⟩ (thinkN_mem n)
instance thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) : ∀ [Terminates s] (n), Terminates (thinkN s n)
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, n => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem n).2 h⟩⟩
theorem of_thinkN_terminates (s : Computation α) (n) : Terminates (thinkN s n) → Terminates s
| ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, (thinkN_mem _).1 h⟩⟩
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
def Promises (s : Computation α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a'⦄, a' ∈ s → a = a'
/-- `Promises s a`, or `s ~> a`, asserts that although the computation `s`
may not terminate, if it does, then the result is `a`. -/
scoped infixl:50 " ~> " => Promises
theorem mem_promises {s : Computation α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → s ~> a := fun h _ => mem_unique h
theorem empty_promises (a : α) : empty α ~> a := fun _ h => absurd h (not_mem_empty _)
section get
variable (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s]
/-- `length s` gets the number of steps of a terminating computation -/
def length : ℕ :=
Nat.find ((terminates_def _).1 h)
/-- `get s` returns the result of a terminating computation -/
def get : α :=
Option.get _ (Nat.find_spec <| (terminates_def _).1 h)
theorem get_mem : get s ∈ s :=
Exists.intro (length s) (Option.eq_some_of_isSome _).symm
theorem get_eq_of_mem {a} : a ∈ s → get s = a :=
mem_unique (get_mem _)
theorem mem_of_get_eq {a} : get s = a → a ∈ s := by intro h; rw [← h]; apply get_mem
@[simp]
theorem get_think : get (think s) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <|
let ⟨n, h⟩ := get_mem s
⟨n + 1, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_thinkN (n) : get (thinkN s n) = get s :=
get_eq_of_mem _ <| (thinkN_mem _).2 (get_mem _)
theorem get_promises : s ~> get s := fun _ => get_eq_of_mem _
theorem mem_of_promises {a} (p : s ~> a) : a ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨h⟩ := h
obtain ⟨a', h⟩ := h
rw [p h]
exact h
theorem get_eq_of_promises {a} : s ~> a → get s = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ∘ mem_of_promises _
end get
/-- `Results s a n` completely characterizes a terminating computation:
it asserts that `s` terminates after exactly `n` steps, with result `a`. -/
def Results (s : Computation α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :=
∃ h : a ∈ s, @length _ s (terminates_of_mem h) = n
theorem results_of_terminates (s : Computation α) [_T : Terminates s] :
Results s (get s) (length s) :=
⟨get_mem _, rfl⟩
theorem results_of_terminates' (s : Computation α) [T : Terminates s] {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
Results s a (length s) := by rw [← get_eq_of_mem _ h]; apply results_of_terminates
theorem Results.mem {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results s a n → a ∈ s
| ⟨m, _⟩ => m
theorem Results.terminates {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Terminates s :=
terminates_of_mem h.mem
theorem Results.length {s : Computation α} {a n} [_T : Terminates s] : Results s a n → length s = n
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Results.val_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
a = b :=
mem_unique h1.mem h2.mem
theorem Results.len_unique {s : Computation α} {a b m n} (h1 : Results s a m) (h2 : Results s b n) :
m = n := by haveI := h1.terminates; haveI := h2.terminates; rw [← h1.length, h2.length]
theorem exists_results_of_mem {s : Computation α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, Results s a n :=
haveI := terminates_of_mem h
⟨_, results_of_terminates' s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem get_pure (a : α) : get (pure a) = a :=
get_eq_of_mem _ ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_pure (a : α) : length (pure a) = 0 :=
let h := Computation.ret_terminates a
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.find_min' ((terminates_def (pure a)).1 h) rfl
theorem results_pure (a : α) : Results (pure a) a 0 :=
⟨ret_mem a, length_pure _⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_think (s : Computation α) [h : Terminates s] : length (think s) = length s + 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Nat.find_min' _ (Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 h))
· have : (Option.isSome ((think s).val (length (think s))) : Prop) :=
Nat.find_spec ((terminates_def _).1 s.think_terminates)
revert this; rcases length (think s) with - | n <;> intro this
· simp [think, Stream'.cons] at this
· apply Nat.succ_le_succ
apply Nat.find_min'
apply this
theorem results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : Results (think s) a (n + 1) :=
haveI := h.terminates
⟨think_mem h.mem, by rw [length_think, h.length]⟩
theorem of_results_think {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results (think s) a n) :
∃ m, Results s a m ∧ n = m + 1 := by
haveI := of_think_terminates h.terminates
have := results_of_terminates' _ (of_think_mem h.mem)
exact ⟨_, this, Results.len_unique h (results_think this)⟩
@[simp]
theorem results_think_iff {s : Computation α} {a n} : Results (think s) a (n + 1) ↔ Results s a n :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨n', r, e⟩ := of_results_think h
injection e with h'; rwa [h'], results_think⟩
theorem results_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a m} :
∀ n, Results s a m → Results (thinkN s n) a (m + n)
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => results_think (results_thinkN n h)
theorem results_thinkN_pure (a : α) (n) : Results (thinkN (pure a) n) a n := by
have := results_thinkN n (results_pure a); rwa [Nat.zero_add] at this
@[simp]
theorem length_thinkN (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] (n) :
length (thinkN s n) = length s + n :=
(results_thinkN n (results_of_terminates _)).length
theorem eq_thinkN {s : Computation α} {a n} (h : Results s a n) : s = thinkN (pure a) n := by
revert s
induction n with | zero => _ | succ n IH => _ <;>
(intro s; apply recOn s (fun a' => _) fun s => _) <;> intro a h
· rw [← eq_of_pure_mem h.mem]
rfl
· obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := of_results_think h
cases h
contradiction
· have := h.len_unique (results_pure _)
contradiction
· rw [IH (results_think_iff.1 h)]
rfl
theorem eq_thinkN' (s : Computation α) [_h : Terminates s] :
s = thinkN (pure (get s)) (length s) :=
eq_thinkN (results_of_terminates _)
/-- Recursor based on membership -/
def memRecOn {C : Computation α → Sort v} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
haveI T := terminates_of_mem M
rw [eq_thinkN' s, get_eq_of_mem s M]
generalize length s = n
induction' n with n IH; exacts [h1, h2 _ IH]
/-- Recursor based on assertion of `Terminates` -/
def terminatesRecOn
{C : Computation α → Sort v}
(s) [Terminates s]
(h1 : ∀ a, C (pure a))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s :=
memRecOn (get_mem s) (h1 _) h2
/-- Map a function on the result of a computation. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Computation α → Computation β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map fun o => Option.casesOn o none (some ∘ f), fun n b => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with a <;> intro h
· contradiction
· rw [al e]; exact h⟩
/-- bind over a `Sum` of `Computation` -/
def Bind.g : β ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl b => Sum.inl b
| Sum.inr cb' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inr cb'
/-- bind over a function mapping `α` to a `Computation` -/
def Bind.f (f : α → Computation β) :
Computation α ⊕ Computation β → β ⊕ (Computation α ⊕ Computation β)
| Sum.inl ca =>
match destruct ca with
| Sum.inl a => Bind.g <| destruct (f a)
| Sum.inr ca' => Sum.inr <| Sum.inl ca'
| Sum.inr cb => Bind.g <| destruct cb
/-- Compose two computations into a monadic `bind` operation. -/
def bind (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : Computation β :=
corec (Bind.f f) (Sum.inl c)
instance : Bind Computation :=
⟨@bind⟩
theorem has_bind_eq_bind {β} (c : Computation α) (f : α → Computation β) : c >>= f = bind c f :=
rfl
/-- Flatten a computation of computations into a single computation. -/
def join (c : Computation (Computation α)) : Computation α :=
c >>= id
@[simp]
| theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (a) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Computation.lean | 574 | 577 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Submonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
/-!
# Star ordered ring structure on `ℤ`
This file shows that `ℤ` is a `StarOrderedRing`.
-/
open AddSubmonoid Set
|
namespace Int
@[simp] lemma addSubmonoid_closure_range_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) :
closure (range fun x : ℤ ↦ x ^ n) = nonneg _ := by
refine le_antisymm (closure_le.2 <| range_subset_iff.2 hn.pow_nonneg) fun x hx ↦ ?_
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Star.lean | 19 | 24 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,065 | 1,066 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.M
/-!
# Quotients of Polynomial Functors
We assume the following:
* `P`: a polynomial functor
* `W`: its W-type
* `M`: its M-type
* `F`: a functor
We define:
* `q`: `QPF` data, representing `F` as a quotient of `P`
The main goal is to construct:
* `Fix`: the initial algebra with structure map `F Fix → Fix`.
* `Cofix`: the final coalgebra with structure map `Cofix → F Cofix`
We also show that the composition of qpfs is a qpf, and that the quotient of a qpf
is a qpf.
The present theory focuses on the univariate case for qpfs
## References
* [Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial
Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
/-- Quotients of polynomial functors.
Roughly speaking, saying that `F` is a quotient of a polynomial functor means that for each `α`,
elements of `F α` are represented by pairs `⟨a, f⟩`, where `a` is the shape of the object and
`f` indexes the relevant elements of `α`, in a suitably natural manner.
-/
class QPF (F : Type u → Type u) extends Functor F where
P : PFunctor.{u}
abs : ∀ {α}, P α → F α
repr : ∀ {α}, F α → P α
abs_repr : ∀ {α} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x
abs_map : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β) (p : P α), abs (P.map f p) = f <$> abs p
namespace QPF
variable {F : Type u → Type u} [q : QPF F]
open Functor (Liftp Liftr)
/-
Show that every qpf is a lawful functor.
Note: every functor has a field, `map_const`, and `lawfulFunctor` has the defining
characterization. We can only propagate the assumption.
-/
theorem id_map {α : Type _} (x : F α) : id <$> x = x := by
rw [← abs_repr x]
obtain ⟨a, f⟩ := repr x
rw [← abs_map]
rfl
theorem comp_map {α β γ : Type _} (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : F α) :
(g ∘ f) <$> x = g <$> f <$> x := by
rw [← abs_repr x]
obtain ⟨a, f⟩ := repr x
rw [← abs_map, ← abs_map, ← abs_map]
rfl
theorem lawfulFunctor
(h : ∀ α β : Type u, @Functor.mapConst F _ α _ = Functor.map ∘ Function.const β) :
LawfulFunctor F :=
{ map_const := @h
id_map := @id_map F _
comp_map := @comp_map F _ }
/-
Lifting predicates and relations
-/
section
open Functor
theorem liftp_iff {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : F α) :
Liftp p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = abs ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i, p (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases h : repr y with ⟨a, f⟩
use a, fun i => (f i).val
constructor
· rw [← hy, ← abs_repr y, h, ← abs_map]
rfl
intro i
apply (f i).property
rintro ⟨a, f, h₀, h₁⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i => ⟨f i, h₁ i⟩⟩
rw [← abs_map, h₀]; rfl
theorem liftp_iff' {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : F α) :
Liftp p x ↔ ∃ u : q.P α, abs u = x ∧ ∀ i, p (u.snd i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
rcases h : repr y with ⟨a, f⟩
use ⟨a, fun i => (f i).val⟩
dsimp
| constructor
· rw [← hy, ← abs_repr y, h, ← abs_map]
rfl
intro i
apply (f i).property
rintro ⟨⟨a, f⟩, h₀, h₁⟩; dsimp at *
use abs ⟨a, fun i => ⟨f i, h₁ i⟩⟩
rw [← abs_map, ← h₀]; rfl
theorem liftr_iff {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (x y : F α) :
Liftr r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = abs ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = abs ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i, r (f₀ i) (f₁ i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩
rcases h : repr u with ⟨a, f⟩
use a, fun i => (f i).val.fst, fun i => (f i).val.snd
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Univariate/Basic.lean | 117 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Semantics
/-!
# Definable Sets
This file defines what it means for a set over a first-order structure to be definable.
## Main Definitions
- `Set.Definable` is defined so that `A.Definable L s` indicates that the
set `s` of a finite cartesian power of `M` is definable with parameters in `A`.
- `Set.Definable₁` is defined so that `A.Definable₁ L s` indicates that
`(s : Set M)` is definable with parameters in `A`.
- `Set.Definable₂` is defined so that `A.Definable₂ L s` indicates that
`(s : Set (M × M))` is definable with parameters in `A`.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.DefinableSet` is defined so that `L.DefinableSet A α` is the boolean
algebra of subsets of `α → M` defined by formulas with parameters in `A`.
## Main Results
- `L.DefinableSet A α` forms a `BooleanAlgebra`
- `Set.Definable.image_comp` shows that definability is closed under projections in finite
dimensions.
-/
universe u v w u₁
namespace Set
variable {M : Type w} (A : Set M) (L : FirstOrder.Language.{u, v}) [L.Structure M]
open FirstOrder FirstOrder.Language FirstOrder.Language.Structure
variable {α : Type u₁} {β : Type*}
/-- A subset of a finite Cartesian product of a structure is definable over a set `A` when
membership in the set is given by a first-order formula with parameters from `A`. -/
def Definable (s : Set (α → M)) : Prop :=
∃ φ : L[[A]].Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize
variable {L} {A} {B : Set M} {s : Set (α → M)}
theorem Definable.map_expansion {L' : FirstOrder.Language} [L'.Structure M] (h : A.Definable L s)
(φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] : A.Definable L' s := by
obtain ⟨ψ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨(φ.addConstants A).onFormula ψ, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, LHom.realize_onFormula]
theorem definable_iff_exists_formula_sum :
A.Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula (A ⊕ α), s = {v | φ.Realize (Sum.elim (↑) v)} := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv)]
refine exists_congr (fun φ => iff_iff_eq.2 (congr_arg (s = ·) ?_))
ext
simp only [BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv, constantsOn,
BoundedFormula.mapTermRelEquiv_symm_apply, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.Realize]
refine BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_id ?_ (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
intros
simp only [Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply, Term.realize_varsToConstants,
coe_con, Term.realize_relabel]
congr
ext a
rcases a with (_ | _) | _ <;> rfl
theorem empty_definable_iff :
(∅ : Set M).Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (LEquiv.addEmptyConstants L (∅ : Set M)).onFormula]
simp
theorem definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params :
A.Definable L s ↔ (∅ : Set M).Definable (L[[A]]) s :=
empty_definable_iff.symm
theorem Definable.mono (hAs : A.Definable L s) (hAB : A ⊆ B) : B.Definable L s := by
rw [definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params] at *
exact hAs.map_expansion (L.lhomWithConstantsMap (Set.inclusion hAB))
@[simp]
theorem definable_empty : A.Definable L (∅ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊥, by
ext
simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem definable_univ : A.Definable L (univ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊤, by
ext
simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem Definable.inter {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∩ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, rfl⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊓ θ, ?_⟩
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem Definable.union {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∪ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, hθ⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊔ θ, ?_⟩
ext
rw [hφ, hθ, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.realize_sup, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem definable_finset_inf {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.inf f) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction definable_univ (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.inf_insert]
exact (hf i).inter h
theorem definable_finset_sup {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.sup f) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction definable_empty (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.sup_insert]
exact (hf i).union h
theorem definable_finset_biInter {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)}
(hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i)) (s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
rw [← Finset.inf_set_eq_iInter]
exact definable_finset_inf hf s
theorem definable_finset_biUnion {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)}
(hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i)) (s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
rw [← Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion]
exact definable_finset_sup hf s
@[simp]
theorem Definable.compl {s : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L s) : A.Definable L sᶜ := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
refine ⟨φ.not, ?_⟩
ext v
rw [hφ, compl_setOf, mem_setOf, mem_setOf, Formula.realize_not]
| @[simp]
theorem Definable.sdiff {s t : Set (α → M)} (hs : A.Definable L s) (ht : A.Definable L t) :
A.Definable L (s \ t) :=
hs.inter ht.compl
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Definability.lean | 147 | 150 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
/-! # Image and map operations on finite sets
This file provides the finite analog of `Set.image`, along with some other similar functions.
Note there are two ways to take the image over a finset; via `Finset.image` which applies the
function then removes duplicates (requiring `DecidableEq`), or via `Finset.map` which exploits
injectivity of the function to avoid needing to deduplicate. Choosing between these is similar to
choosing between `insert` and `Finset.cons`, or between `Finset.union` and `Finset.disjUnion`.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.image`: Given a function `f : α → β`, `s.image f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.map`: Given an embedding `f : α ↪ β`, `s.map f` is the image finset in `β`.
* `Finset.filterMap` Given a function `f : α → Option β`, `s.filterMap f` is the
image finset in `β`, filtering out `none`s.
* `Finset.subtype`: `s.subtype p` is the finset of `Subtype p` whose elements belong to `s`.
* `Finset.fin`:`s.fin n` is the finset of all elements of `s` less than `n`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid OrderedCommMonoid
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Multiset
open Function
namespace Finset
/-! ### map -/
section Map
open Function
/-- When `f` is an embedding of `α` in `β` and `s` is a finset in `α`, then `s.map f` is the image
finset in `β`. The embedding condition guarantees that there are no duplicates in the image. -/
def map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
⟨s.1.map f, s.2.map f.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_val (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (map f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_empty (f : α ↪ β) : (∅ : Finset α).map f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b :=
Multiset.mem_map
-- Higher priority to apply before `mem_map`.
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map_equiv {f : α ≃ β} {b : β} : b ∈ s.map f.toEmbedding ↔ f.symm b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_map]
exact
⟨by
rintro ⟨a, H, rfl⟩
simpa, fun h => ⟨_, h, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp 1100]
theorem mem_map' (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : f a ∈ s.map f ↔ a ∈ s :=
mem_map_of_injective f.2
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α ↪ β) {a} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ s.map f :=
(mem_map' _).2
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ a, a ∈ s.map f → Prop} :
(∀ y (H : y ∈ s.map f), p y H) ↔ ∀ x (H : x ∈ s), p (f x) (mem_map_of_mem _ H) :=
⟨fun h y hy => h (f y) (mem_map_of_mem _ hy),
fun h x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := mem_map.1 hx
exact h _ hy⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) (x : s) : f x ∈ s.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.prop
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) = f '' s :=
Set.ext (by simp only [mem_coe, mem_map, Set.mem_image, implies_true])
theorem coe_map_subset_range (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f : Set β) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.map f) = f '' s := coe_map f s
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem map_perm {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : s.map (σ : α ↪ α) = s :=
coe_injective <| (coe_map _ _).trans <| Set.image_perm hs
theorem map_toFinset [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.map f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_map, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_toFinset]
@[simp]
theorem map_refl : s.map (Embedding.refl _) = s :=
ext fun _ => by simpa only [mem_map, exists_prop] using exists_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem map_cast_heq {α β} (h : α = β) (s : Finset α) :
HEq (s.map (Equiv.cast h).toEmbedding) s := by
subst h
simp
theorem map_map (f : α ↪ β) (g : β ↪ γ) (s : Finset α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (f.trans g) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
theorem map_comm {β'} {f : β ↪ γ} {g : α ↪ β} {f' : α ↪ β'} {g' : β' ↪ γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.map g).map f = (s.map f').map g' := by
simp_rw [map_map, Embedding.trans, Function.comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_map {f : α ↪ β} {ga : α ↪ α} {gb : β ↪ β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (map f) (map ga) (map gb) := fun _ =>
map_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_map {f g : α ↪ α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (map f) (map g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f ⊆ s₂.map f ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ xs => (mem_map' _).1 <| h <| (mem_map' f).2 xs,
fun h => by simp [subset_def, Multiset.map_subset_map h]⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_subset⟩ := map_subset_map
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.subset_symm_image`. -/
theorem subset_map_symm {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : s ⊆ t.map f.symm ↔ s.map f ⊆ t := by
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv, Equiv.symm_symm] at hx
simpa using h hx
· simp only [mem_map_equiv]
exact h (by simp [hx])
/-- The `Finset` version of `Equiv.symm_image_subset`. -/
theorem map_symm_subset {t : Finset β} {f : α ≃ β} : t.map f.symm ⊆ s ↔ t ⊆ s.map f := by
simp only [← subset_map_symm, Equiv.symm_symm]
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the order embedding that maps a finset to its
image under `f`. -/
def mapEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) : Finset α ↪o Finset β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (map f) fun _ _ => map_subset_map
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.map f = s₂.map f ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective.eq_iff
theorem map_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Injective (map f) :=
(mapEmbedding f).injective
@[simp]
theorem map_ssubset_map {s t : Finset α} : s.map f ⊂ t.map f ↔ s ⊂ t := (mapEmbedding f).lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.finsetMap_ssubset⟩ := map_ssubset_map
@[simp]
theorem mapEmbedding_apply : mapEmbedding f s = map f s :=
rfl
theorem filter_map {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.map f).filter p = (s.filter (p ∘ f)).map f :=
eq_of_veq (Multiset.filter_map _ _ _)
lemma map_filter' (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α)
[DecidablePred (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = ·)] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [Function.comp_def, filter_map, f.injective.eq_iff]
lemma filter_attach' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
s.attach.filter p =
(s.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map
⟨Subtype.map id <| filter_subset _ _, Subtype.map_injective _ injective_id⟩ :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach' _ _
lemma filter_attach (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Finset α) :
s.attach.filter (fun a : s ↦ p a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map ((Embedding.refl _).subtypeMap mem_of_mem_filter) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_attach _ _
theorem map_filter {f : α ≃ β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.filter p).map f.toEmbedding = (s.map f.toEmbedding).filter (p ∘ f.symm) := by
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_map {s t : Finset α} (f : α ↪ β) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
mod_cast Set.disjoint_image_iff f.injective (s := s) (t := t)
theorem map_disjUnion {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h) (h' := (disjoint_map _).mpr h) :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_add _ _ _
/-- A version of `Finset.map_disjUnion` for writing in the other direction. -/
theorem map_disjUnion' {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (h') (h := (disjoint_map _).mp h') :
(s₁.disjUnion s₂ h).map f = (s₁.map f).disjUnion (s₂.map f) h' :=
map_disjUnion _ _ _
theorem map_union [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∪ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem map_inter [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] {f : α ↪ β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).map f = s₁.map f ∩ s₂.map f :=
mod_cast Set.image_inter f.injective (s := s₁) (t := s₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) : map f {a} = {f a} :=
coe_injective <| by simp only [coe_map, coe_singleton, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_insert [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).map f = insert (f a) (s.map f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, map_union, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
(cons a s ha).map f = cons (f a) (s.map f) (by simpa using ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_cons f a s.val
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_empty : s.map f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := (map_injective f).eq_iff' (map_empty f)
@[simp]
theorem map_nonempty : (s.map f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := s)
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.map⟩ := map_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem map_nontrivial : (s.map f).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
mod_cast Set.image_nontrivial f.injective (s := s)
theorem attach_map_val {s : Finset α} : s.attach.map (Embedding.subtype _) = s :=
eq_of_veq <| by rw [map_val, attach_val]; exact Multiset.attach_map_val _
end Map
theorem range_add_one' (n : ℕ) :
range (n + 1) = insert 0 ((range n).map ⟨fun i => i + 1, fun i j => by simp⟩) := by
ext (⟨⟩ | ⟨n⟩) <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ n]
/-! ### image -/
section Image
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `image f s` is the forward image of `s` under `f`. -/
def image (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : Finset β :=
(s.1.map f).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem image_val (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (image f s).1 = (s.1.map f).dedup :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : (∅ : Finset α).image f = ∅ :=
rfl
variable {f g : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {a : α} {b c : β}
@[simp]
theorem mem_image : b ∈ s.image f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b := by
simp only [mem_def, image_val, mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_map, exists_prop]
theorem mem_image_of_mem (f : α → β) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ s.image f :=
mem_image.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
lemma forall_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
lemma exists_mem_image {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ s.image f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias forall_image := forall_mem_image
theorem map_eq_image (f : α ↪ β) (s : Finset α) : s.map f = s.image f :=
eq_of_veq (s.map f).2.dedup.symm
-- Not `@[simp]` since `mem_image` already gets most of the way there.
theorem mem_image_const : c ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ b = c := by
rw [mem_image]
simp only [exists_prop, const_apply, exists_and_right]
rfl
theorem mem_image_const_self : b ∈ s.image (const α b) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mem_image_const.trans <| and_iff_left rfl
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift β α c p] :
CanLift (Finset β) (Finset α) (image c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨⟨l⟩, hd : l.Nodup⟩ hl
lift l to List α using hl
exact ⟨⟨l, hd.of_map _⟩, ext fun a => by simp⟩
theorem image_congr (h : (s : Set α).EqOn f g) : Finset.image f s = Finset.image g s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_image, ← bex_def]
exact exists₂_congr fun x hx => by rw [h hx]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_finset_image (hf : Injective f) :
f a ∈ s.image f ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem f⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, heq⟩ := mem_image.1 h
exact hf heq ▸ hy
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image : ↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s :=
Set.ext <| by simp only [mem_coe, mem_image, Set.mem_image, implies_true]
@[simp]
lemma image_nonempty : (s.image f).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
mod_cast Set.image_nonempty (f := f) (s := (s : Set α))
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.image (h : s.Nonempty) (f : α → β) : (s.image f).Nonempty :=
image_nonempty.2 h
alias ⟨Nonempty.of_image, _⟩ := image_nonempty
theorem image_toFinset [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α} :
s.toFinset.image f = (s.map f).toFinset :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_image, Multiset.mem_toFinset, exists_prop, Multiset.mem_map]
theorem image_val_of_injOn (H : Set.InjOn f s) : (image f s).1 = s.1.map f :=
(s.2.map_on H).dedup
@[simp]
theorem image_id [DecidableEq α] : s.image id = s :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, id, exists_eq_right]
@[simp]
theorem image_id' [DecidableEq α] : (s.image fun x => x) = s :=
image_id
theorem image_image [DecidableEq γ] {g : β → γ} : (s.image f).image g = s.image (g ∘ f) :=
eq_of_veq <| by simp only [image_val, dedup_map_dedup_eq, Multiset.map_map]
theorem image_comm {β'} [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'}
{g' : β' → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) :
(s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by simp_rw [image_image, comp_def, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.finset_image [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.finset_image [DecidableEq α] {f g : α → α}
(h : Function.Commute f g) : Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.finset_image h
theorem image_subset_image {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.image f ⊆ s₂.image f := by
simp only [subset_def, image_val, subset_dedup', dedup_subset', Multiset.map_subset_map h]
theorem image_subset_iff : s.image f ⊆ t ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t :=
calc
s.image f ⊆ t ↔ f '' ↑s ⊆ ↑t := by norm_cast
_ ↔ _ := Set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_mono (f : α → β) : Monotone (Finset.image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset_image
lemma image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
simpa only [funext (map_eq_image _)] using map_injective ⟨f, hf⟩
lemma image_inj {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) : s.image f = t.image f ↔ s = t :=
(image_injective hf).eq_iff
theorem image_subset_image_iff {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) :
s.image f ⊆ t.image f ↔ s ⊆ t :=
mod_cast Set.image_subset_image_iff hf (s := s) (t := t)
lemma image_ssubset_image {t : Finset α} (hf : Injective f) : s.image f ⊂ t.image f ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp_rw [← lt_iff_ssubset]
exact lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (image_subset_image_iff hf) (image_subset_image_iff hf)
theorem coe_image_subset_range : ↑(s.image f) ⊆ Set.range f :=
calc
↑(s.image f) = f '' ↑s := coe_image
_ ⊆ Set.range f := Set.image_subset_range f ↑s
theorem filter_image {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
(s.image f).filter p = (s.filter fun a ↦ p (f a)).image f :=
ext fun b => by
simp only [mem_filter, mem_image, exists_prop]
exact
⟨by rintro ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩; exact ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩,
by rintro ⟨x, ⟨h1, h2⟩, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨x, h1, rfl⟩, h2⟩⟩
theorem fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image {y : β} : (s.filter (f · = y)).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ s.image f := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem image_union [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∪ s₂.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_union f s₁ s₂
theorem image_inter_subset [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s t : Finset α) :
(s ∩ t).image f ⊆ s.image f ∩ t.image f :=
(image_mono f).map_inf_le s t
theorem image_inter_of_injOn [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s t : Finset α)
(hf : Set.InjOn f (s ∪ t)) : (s ∩ t).image f = s.image f ∩ t.image f :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.image_inter_on fun a ha b hb => hf (Or.inr ha) <| Or.inl hb
theorem image_inter [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) (hf : Injective f) :
(s₁ ∩ s₂).image f = s₁.image f ∩ s₂.image f :=
image_inter_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : image f {a} = {f a} :=
ext fun x => by simpa only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left] using eq_comm
@[simp]
theorem image_insert [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
(insert a s).image f = insert (f a) (s.image f) := by
simp only [insert_eq, image_singleton, image_union]
theorem erase_image_subset_image_erase [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(s.image f).erase (f a) ⊆ (s.erase a).image f := by
simp only [subset_iff, and_imp, exists_prop, mem_image, exists_imp, mem_erase]
rintro b hb x hx rfl
exact ⟨_, ⟨ne_of_apply_ne f hb, hx⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_erase [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(s.erase a).image f = (s.image f).erase (f a) :=
coe_injective <| by push_cast [Set.image_diff hf, Set.image_singleton]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem image_eq_empty : s.image f = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := mod_cast Set.image_eq_empty (f := f) (s := s)
theorem image_sdiff [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} (s t : Finset α) (hf : Injective f) :
(s \ t).image f = s.image f \ t.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_diff hf s t
lemma image_sdiff_of_injOn [DecidableEq α] {t : Finset α} (hf : Set.InjOn f s) (hts : t ⊆ s) :
(s \ t).image f = s.image f \ t.image f :=
mod_cast Set.image_diff_of_injOn hf <| coe_subset.2 hts
theorem _root_.Disjoint.of_image_finset {s t : Finset α} {f : α → β}
(h : Disjoint (s.image f) (t.image f)) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_iff_ne.2 fun _ ha _ hb =>
ne_of_apply_ne f <| h.forall_ne_finset (mem_image_of_mem _ ha) (mem_image_of_mem _ hb)
theorem mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq' [DecidableEq α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀ i, f (i % n) = f i) :
a ∈ Set.range f ↔ a ∈ (Finset.range n).image fun i => f i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_range]
exact ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt i hn, (rfl.congr hi).mp (h i)⟩
· rintro h
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, Set.mem_range, mem_range] at *
rcases h with ⟨i, _, ha⟩
exact ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_range_iff_mem_finset_range_of_mod_eq [DecidableEq α] {f : ℤ → α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}
(hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀ i, f (i % n) = f i) :
a ∈ Set.range f ↔ a ∈ (Finset.range n).image (fun (i : ℕ) => f i) :=
suffices (∃ i, f (i % n) = a) ↔ ∃ i, i < n ∧ f ↑i = a by simpa [h]
have hn' : 0 < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr hn
Iff.intro
(fun ⟨i, hi⟩ =>
have : 0 ≤ i % ↑n := Int.emod_nonneg _ (ne_of_gt hn')
⟨Int.toNat (i % n), by
rw [← Int.ofNat_lt, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this]; exact ⟨Int.emod_lt_of_pos i hn', hi⟩⟩)
fun ⟨i, hi, ha⟩ =>
⟨i, by rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt (Int.ofNat_zero_le _) (Int.ofNat_lt_ofNat_of_lt hi), ha]⟩
@[simp]
theorem attach_image_val [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} : s.attach.image Subtype.val = s :=
| eq_of_veq <| by rw [image_val, attach_val, Multiset.attach_map_val, dedup_eq_self]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Image.lean | 489 | 490 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
/-!
# A Fubini theorem for categorical (co)limits
We prove that $lim_{J × K} G = lim_J (lim_K G(j, -))$ for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
when all the appropriate limits exist.
We begin working with a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`. We'll write `G : J × K ⥤ C` for the associated
"uncurried" functor.
In the first part, given a coherent family `D` of limit cones over the functors `F.obj j`,
and a cone `c` over `G`, we construct a cone over the cone points of `D`.
We then show that if `c` is a limit cone, the constructed cone is also a limit cone.
In the second part, we state the Fubini theorem in the setting where limits are
provided by suitable `HasLimit` classes.
We construct
`limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim)`
and give simp lemmas characterising it.
For convenience, we also provide
`limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G : limit G ≅ limit ((curry.obj G) ⋙ lim)`
in terms of the uncurried functor.
All statements have their counterpart for colimits.
-/
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type*} [Category J] [Category K]
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C) (G : J × K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCones where
/-- For each object, a cone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cocones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCocones where
/-- For each object, a cocone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cocones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cocone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCocones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `F.obj j`, and a cone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `curry.obj G j`, and a cone over `G`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeCurry {D : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G)} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone G) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app j := (Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π := { app k := c.π.app (j, k) } }
naturality {_ j'} _ := (Q j').hom_ext (by simp) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones over the `F.obj j`, and a cocone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cocone over the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones under the `curry.obj G j`, and a cocone under `G`,
we can construct a cocone under the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeCurry {D : DiagramOfCocones (curry.obj G)} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone G) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app j := (Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι := { app k := c.ι.app (j, k) } }
naturality {j _} _ := (Q j).hom_ext (by simp) }
/-- `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone when `c` is a limit cone.
-/
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
/-- If `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone then `c` is in fact a limit cone.
-/
def IsLimit.ofConeOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c)) : IsLimit c :=
-- These constructions are used in various fields of the proof so we abstract them here.
letI E (j : J) : Prod.sectR j K ⋙ uncurry.obj F ≅ F.obj j :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
letI S (s : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints :=
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app j := (Q j).lift <|
(Cones.postcompose (E j).hom).obj <| s.whisker (Prod.sectR j K)
naturality {j' j} f := (Q j).hom_ext <|
fun k ↦ by simpa [E] using s.π.naturality ((Prod.sectL J k).map f) } }
{ lift s := P.lift (S s)
fac s p := by
have h1 := (Q p.1).fac ((Cones.postcompose (E p.1).hom).obj <|
s.whisker (Prod.sectR p.1 K)) p.2
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Cones.postcompose_obj_pt, Cone.whisker_pt, Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Cone.whisker_π, NatTrans.comp_app, Functor.const_obj_obj, whiskerLeft_app,
NatIso.ofComponents_hom_app, Iso.refl_hom, Category.comp_id, E] at h1
have h2 := (P.fac (S s) p.1)
dsimp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Functor.const_obj_obj, DiagramOfCones.conePoints_obj, DiagramOfCones.conePoints_map,
Functor.const_obj_map, id_eq, Cones.postcompose_obj_pt, Cone.whisker_pt,
Cones.postcompose_obj_π, Cone.whisker_π, NatTrans.comp_app, whiskerLeft_app,
NatIso.ofComponents_hom_app, Iso.refl_hom, Prod.sectL_obj, Prod.sectL_map, eq_mp_eq_cast,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, coneOfConeUncurry_pt, coneOfConeUncurry_π_app, S, E] at h2 ⊢
simp [← h1, ← h2]
uniq s f hf := P.uniq (s := S s) _ <|
fun j ↦ (Q j).hom_ext <| fun k ↦ by simpa [S, E] using hf (j, k) }
/-- `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone when `c` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
/-- If `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone then `c` is in fact a colimit
cocone. -/
def IsColimit.ofCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F}
(Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j)) {c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)}
(P : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c)) : IsColimit c :=
-- These constructions are used in various fields of the proof so we abstract them here.
letI E (j : J) : (Prod.sectR j K ⋙ uncurry.obj F ≅ F.obj j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
letI S (s : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints :=
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app j := (Q j).desc <|
(Cocones.precompose (E j).inv).obj <| s.whisker (Prod.sectR j K)
naturality {j j'} f := (Q j).hom_ext <|
fun k ↦ by simpa [E] using s.ι.naturality ((Prod.sectL J k).map f) } }
{ desc s := P.desc (S s)
fac s p := by
have h1 := (Q p.1).fac ((Cocones.precompose (E p.1).inv).obj <|
s.whisker (Prod.sectR p.1 K)) p.2
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocone.whisker_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj,
Cocones.precompose_obj_ι, Cocone.whisker_ι, NatTrans.comp_app, NatIso.ofComponents_inv_app,
Iso.refl_inv, whiskerLeft_app, Category.id_comp, E] at h1
have h2 := (P.fac (S s) p.1)
dsimp only [DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj,
uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app, Functor.const_obj_obj, DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints_map,
Functor.const_obj_map, id_eq, Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocone.whisker_pt,
Cocones.precompose_obj_ι, Cocone.whisker_ι, NatTrans.comp_app, NatIso.ofComponents_inv_app,
Iso.refl_inv, whiskerLeft_app, Prod.sectL_obj, Prod.sectL_map, eq_mp_eq_cast,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, coconeOfCoconeUncurry_pt, coconeOfCoconeUncurry_ι_app, S, E] at h2 ⊢
simp [← h1, ← h2]
uniq s f hf := P.uniq (s := S s) _ <|
fun j ↦ (Q j).hom_ext <| fun k ↦ by simpa [S, E] using hf (j, k) }
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed limits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the limit cone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
section
variable [HasLimit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim)]
/-- Given a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C` such that `(curry.obj G ⋙ lim)` makes sense and has a limit,
we can construct a cone over `G` with `limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim)` as a cone point -/
noncomputable def coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim : Cone G :=
let Q : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G) := .mkOfHasLimits _
{ pt := limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim),
π :=
{ app x := limit.π (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) x.fst ≫ (Q.obj x.fst).π.app x.snd
naturality {x y} := fun ⟨f₁, f₂⟩ ↦ by
have := (Q.obj x.1).w f₂
dsimp [Q] at this ⊢
rw [← limit.w (F := curry.obj G ⋙ lim) (f := f₁)]
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc, Category.id_comp, Prod.fac (f₁, f₂),
G.map_comp, limMap_π, curry_obj_map_app, reassoc_of% this] } }
/-- The cone `coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim` is in fact a limit cone.
-/
noncomputable def isLimitConeOfHasLimitCurryCompLim : IsLimit (coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim G) :=
let Q : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G) := .mkOfHasLimits _
let Q' : ∀ j, IsLimit (Q.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
{ lift c' := limit.lift (F := curry.obj G ⋙ lim) (coneOfConeCurry G Q' c')
fac c' f := by simp [coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim, Q, Q']
uniq c' f h := by
dsimp [coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim] at f h ⊢
| refine limit.hom_ext (F := curry.obj G ⋙ lim) (fun j ↦ limit.hom_ext (fun k ↦ ?_))
simp [h ⟨j, k⟩, Q'] }
/-- The functor `G` has a limit if `C` has `K`-shaped limits and `(curry.obj G ⋙ lim)` has a limit.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 380 | 384 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
/-!
# Bernstein polynomials
The definition of the Bernstein polynomials
```
bernsteinPolynomial (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)
```
and the fact that for `ν : Fin (n+1)` these are linearly independent over `ℚ`.
We prove the basic identities
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = 1`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ ν • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = n • X`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ (ν * (ν-1)) • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = (n * (n-1)) • X^2`
## Notes
See also `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Bernstein`, which defines the Bernstein approximations
of a continuous function `f : C([0,1], ℝ)`, and shows that these converge uniformly to `f`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat (choose)
open Polynomial (X)
open scoped Polynomial
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-- `bernsteinPolynomial R n ν` is `(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)`.
Although the coefficients are integers, it is convenient to work over an arbitrary commutative ring.
-/
def bernsteinPolynomial (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν)
example : bernsteinPolynomial ℤ 3 2 = 3 * X ^ 2 - 3 * X ^ 3 := by
norm_num [bernsteinPolynomial, choose]
ring
namespace bernsteinPolynomial
theorem eq_zero_of_lt {n ν : ℕ} (h : n < ν) : bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map (f : R →+* S) (n ν : ℕ) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).map f = bernsteinPolynomial S n ν := by simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
| end
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Bernstein.lean | 70 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalSubalgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleRing.Basic
/-!
# Subalgebras over Commutative Semiring
In this file we define `Subalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
The `Algebra.adjoin` operation and complete lattice structure can be found in
`Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice`.
-/
universe u u' v w w'
/-- A subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that includes the range of `algebraMap`. -/
structure Subalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Type v
extends Subsemiring A where
/-- The image of `algebraMap` is contained in the underlying set of the subalgebra -/
algebraMap_mem' : ∀ r, algebraMap R A r ∈ carrier
zero_mem' := (algebraMap R A).map_zero ▸ algebraMap_mem' 0
one_mem' := (algebraMap R A).map_one ▸ algebraMap_mem' 1
/-- Reinterpret a `Subalgebra` as a `Subsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc Subalgebra.toSubsemiring
namespace Subalgebra
variable {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C]
instance : SetLike (Subalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
initialize_simps_projections Subalgebra (carrier → coe, as_prefix coe)
/-- The actual `Subalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying `SubsemiringClass` and
`SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
[SetLike S A] [SubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S) :
Subalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
one_mem' := one_mem _
algebraMap_mem' r :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one (A := A) r ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r (one_mem s)
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (Subalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧
(∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧ ∀ (r : R), algebraMap R A r ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := by simpa using h.2.2 0
add_mem' := h.1
one_mem' := by simpa using h.2.2 1
mul_mem' := h.2.1
algebraMap_mem' := h.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance : SubsemiringClass (Subalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := add_mem (s := s.toSubsemiring)
mul_mem {s} := mul_mem (s := s.toSubsemiring)
one_mem {s} := one_mem s.toSubsemiring
zero_mem {s} := zero_mem s.toSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubsemiring {S : Subalgebra R A} {x} : x ∈ S.toSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : Subalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubsemiring (S : Subalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubsemiring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubsemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubsemiring : Subalgebra R A → Subsemiring A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubsemiring, ← mem_toSubsemiring, h]
theorem toSubsemiring_inj {S U : Subalgebra R A} : S.toSubsemiring = U.toSubsemiring ↔ S = U :=
toSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[simps coe toSubsemiring]
protected def copy (S : Subalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : Subalgebra R A :=
{ S.toSubsemiring.copy s hs with
carrier := s
algebraMap_mem' := hs.symm ▸ S.algebraMap_mem' }
theorem copy_eq (S : Subalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
variable (S : Subalgebra R A)
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (Subalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem {S} r x hx := (Algebra.smul_def r x).symm ▸ mul_mem (S.algebraMap_mem' r) hx
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem _root_.algebraMap_mem {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
[SetLike S A] [OneMemClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S) (r : R) :
algebraMap R A r ∈ s :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one (A := A) r ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r (one_mem s)
protected theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ S :=
algebraMap_mem S r
theorem rangeS_le : (algebraMap R A).rangeS ≤ S.toSubsemiring := fun _x ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
hr ▸ S.algebraMap_mem r
theorem range_subset : Set.range (algebraMap R A) ⊆ S := fun _x ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ S.algebraMap_mem r
theorem range_le : Set.range (algebraMap R A) ≤ S :=
S.range_subset
theorem smul_mem {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (r : R) : r • x ∈ S :=
SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : A) ∈ S :=
one_mem S
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) : x * y ∈ S :=
mul_mem hx hy
protected theorem pow_mem {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ S :=
pow_mem hx n
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : A) ∈ S :=
zero_mem S
protected theorem add_mem {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) : x + y ∈ S :=
add_mem hx hy
protected theorem nsmul_mem {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℕ) : n • x ∈ S :=
nsmul_mem hx n
protected theorem natCast_mem (n : ℕ) : (n : A) ∈ S :=
natCast_mem S n
protected theorem list_prod_mem {L : List A} (h : ∀ x ∈ L, x ∈ S) : L.prod ∈ S :=
list_prod_mem h
protected theorem list_sum_mem {L : List A} (h : ∀ x ∈ L, x ∈ S) : L.sum ∈ S :=
list_sum_mem h
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem {m : Multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ m, x ∈ S) : m.sum ∈ S :=
multiset_sum_mem m h
protected theorem sum_mem {ι : Type w} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → A} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, f x ∈ S) :
(∑ x ∈ t, f x) ∈ S :=
sum_mem h
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A]
[Algebra R A] (S : Subalgebra R A) {m : Multiset A} (h : ∀ x ∈ m, x ∈ S) : m.prod ∈ S :=
multiset_prod_mem m h
protected theorem prod_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) {ι : Type w} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → A} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, f x ∈ S) :
(∏ x ∈ t, f x) ∈ S :=
prod_mem h
/-- Turn a `Subalgebra` into a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` by forgetting that it contains `1`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : Subalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
__ := S
smul_mem' r _x hx := S.smul_mem hx r
lemma one_mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : Subalgebra R A) : (1 : A) ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra :=
S.one_mem
instance {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] : SubringClass (Subalgebra R A) A :=
{ Subalgebra.instSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := fun {S x} hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ S.smul_mem hx _ }
protected theorem neg_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) : -x ∈ S :=
neg_mem hx
protected theorem sub_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) : x - y ∈ S :=
sub_mem hx hy
protected theorem zsmul_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) {x : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : n • x ∈ S :=
zsmul_mem hx n
protected theorem intCast_mem {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) (n : ℤ) : (n : A) ∈ S :=
intCast_mem S n
/-- The projection from a subalgebra of `A` to an additive submonoid of `A`. -/
@[simps coe]
def toAddSubmonoid {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) : AddSubmonoid A :=
S.toSubsemiring.toAddSubmonoid
/-- A subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
@[simps toSubsemiring]
def toSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (S : Subalgebra R A) :
Subring A :=
{ S.toSubsemiring with neg_mem' := S.neg_mem }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : Subalgebra R A} {x} : x ∈ S.toSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubring {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : Subalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubring_injective {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] :
Function.Injective (toSubring : Subalgebra R A → Subring A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubring, ← mem_toSubring, h]
theorem toSubring_inj {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S U : Subalgebra R A} : S.toSubring = U.toSubring ↔ S = U :=
toSubring_injective.eq_iff
instance : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toSubsemiring)⟩
section
| /-! `Subalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Subsemiring` / `Semiring` coercions. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Basic.lean | 240 | 242 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Group
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence
/-!
# Division polynomials of Weierstrass curves
This file defines certain polynomials associated to division polynomials of Weierstrass curves.
These are defined in terms of the auxiliary sequences for normalised elliptic divisibility sequences
(EDS) as defined in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a commutative ring `R`. The sequence of `n`-division polynomials
`ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` of `W` is the normalised EDS with initial values
* `ψ₀ := 0`,
* `ψ₁ := 1`,
* `ψ₂ := 2Y + a₁X + a₃`,
* `ψ₃ := 3X⁴ + b₂X³ + 3b₄X² + 3b₆X + b₈`, and
* `ψ₄ := ψ₂ ⬝ (2X⁶ + b₂X⁵ + 5b₄X⁴ + 10b₆X³ + 10b₈X² + (b₂b₈ - b₄b₆)X + (b₄b₈ - b₆²))`.
Furthermore, define the associated sequences `φₙ, ωₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` by
* `φₙ := Xψₙ² - ψₙ₊₁ ⬝ ψₙ₋₁`, and
* `ωₙ := (ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ - ψₙ ⬝ (a₁φₙ + a₃ψₙ²)) / 2`.
Note that `ωₙ` is always well-defined as a polynomial in `R[X, Y]`. As a start, it can be shown by
induction that `ψₙ` always divides `ψ₂ₙ` in `R[X, Y]`, so that `ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ` is always well-defined as
a polynomial, while division by `2` is well-defined when `R` has characteristic different from `2`.
In general, it can be shown that `2` always divides the polynomial `ψ₂ₙ / ψₙ - ψₙ ⬝ (a₁φₙ + a₃ψₙ²)`
in the characteristic `0` universal ring `𝓡[X, Y] := ℤ[A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, A₆][X, Y]` of `W`, where the
`Aᵢ` are indeterminates. Then `ωₙ` can be equivalently defined as the image of this division under
the associated universal morphism `𝓡[X, Y] → R[X, Y]` mapping `Aᵢ` to `aᵢ`.
Now, in the coordinate ring `R[W]`, note that `ψ₂²` is congruent to the polynomial
`Ψ₂Sq := 4X³ + b₂X² + 2b₄X + b₆ ∈ R[X]`. As such, the recurrences of a normalised EDS show that
`ψₙ / ψ₂` are congruent to certain polynomials in `R[W]`. In particular, define `preΨₙ ∈ R[X]` as
the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS with extra parameter `Ψ₂Sq²` and initial values
* `preΨ₀ := 0`,
* `preΨ₁ := 1`,
* `preΨ₂ := 1`,
* `preΨ₃ := ψ₃`, and
* `preΨ₄ := ψ₄ / ψ₂`.
The corresponding normalised EDS `Ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` is then given by
* `Ψₙ := preΨₙ ⬝ ψ₂` if `n` is even, and
* `Ψₙ := preΨₙ` if `n` is odd.
Furthermore, define the associated sequences `ΨSqₙ, Φₙ ∈ R[X]` by
* `ΨSqₙ := preΨₙ² ⬝ Ψ₂Sq` if `n` is even,
* `ΨSqₙ := preΨₙ²` if `n` is odd,
* `Φₙ := XΨSqₙ - preΨₙ₊₁ ⬝ preΨₙ₋₁` if `n` is even, and
* `Φₙ := XΨSqₙ - preΨₙ₊₁ ⬝ preΨₙ₋₁ ⬝ Ψ₂Sq` if `n` is odd.
With these definitions, `ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` and `φₙ ∈ R[X, Y]` are congruent in `R[W]` to `Ψₙ ∈ R[X, Y]`
and `Φₙ ∈ R[X]` respectively, which are defined in terms of `Ψ₂Sq ∈ R[X]` and `preΨₙ ∈ R[X]`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.preΨ`: the univariate polynomials `preΨₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.ΨSq`: the univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Ψ`: the bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Φ`: the univariate polynomials `Φₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.ψ`: the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.φ`: the bivariate polynomials `φₙ`.
* TODO: the bivariate polynomials `ωₙ`.
## Implementation notes
Analogously to `Mathlib.NumberTheory.EllipticDivisibilitySequence`, the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` are defined in terms of the univariate polynomials `preΨₙ`. This is done partially to avoid
ring division, but more crucially to allow the definition of `ΨSqₙ` and `Φₙ` as univariate
polynomials without needing to work under the coordinate ring, and to allow the computation of their
leading terms without ambiguity. Furthermore, evaluating these polynomials at a rational point on
`W` recovers their original definition up to linear combinations of the Weierstrass equation of `W`,
hence also avoiding the need to work in the coordinate ring.
TODO: implementation notes for the definition of `ωₙ`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, division polynomial, torsion point
-/
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, map_div₀,
Polynomial.map_ofNat, Polynomial.map_one, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_neg, Polynomial.map_add,
Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_div, coe_mapRingHom,
apply_ite <| mapRingHom _, WeierstrassCurve.map])
universe r s u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type r} {S : Type s} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : WeierstrassCurve R)
section Ψ₂Sq
/-! ### The univariate polynomial `Ψ₂Sq` -/
/-- The `2`-division polynomial `ψ₂ = Ψ₂`. -/
noncomputable def ψ₂ : R[X][Y] :=
W.toAffine.polynomialY
/-- The univariate polynomial `Ψ₂Sq` congruent to `ψ₂²`. -/
noncomputable def Ψ₂Sq : R[X] :=
C 4 * X ^ 3 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 2 + C (2 * W.b₄) * X + C W.b₆
lemma C_Ψ₂Sq : C W.Ψ₂Sq = W.ψ₂ ^ 2 - 4 * W.toAffine.polynomial := by
rw [Ψ₂Sq, ψ₂, b₂, b₄, b₆, Affine.polynomialY, Affine.polynomial]
C_simp
ring1
lemma ψ₂_sq : W.ψ₂ ^ 2 = C W.Ψ₂Sq + 4 * W.toAffine.polynomial := by
rw [C_Ψ₂Sq, sub_add_cancel]
lemma Affine.CoordinateRing.mk_ψ₂_sq : mk W W.ψ₂ ^ 2 = mk W (C W.Ψ₂Sq) := by
rw [C_Ψ₂Sq, map_sub, map_mul, AdjoinRoot.mk_self, mul_zero, sub_zero, map_pow]
-- TODO: remove `twoTorsionPolynomial` in favour of `Ψ₂Sq`
lemma Ψ₂Sq_eq : W.Ψ₂Sq = W.twoTorsionPolynomial.toPoly :=
rfl
end Ψ₂Sq
section preΨ'
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℕ` -/
/-- The `3`-division polynomial `ψ₃ = Ψ₃`. -/
noncomputable def Ψ₃ : R[X] :=
3 * X ^ 4 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 3 + 3 * C W.b₄ * X ^ 2 + 3 * C W.b₆ * X + C W.b₈
/-- The univariate polynomial `preΨ₄`, which is auxiliary to the 4-division polynomial
`ψ₄ = Ψ₄ = preΨ₄ψ₂`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ₄ : R[X] :=
2 * X ^ 6 + C W.b₂ * X ^ 5 + 5 * C W.b₄ * X ^ 4 + 10 * C W.b₆ * X ^ 3 + 10 * C W.b₈ * X ^ 2 +
C (W.b₂ * W.b₈ - W.b₄ * W.b₆) * X + C (W.b₄ * W.b₈ - W.b₆ ^ 2)
/-- The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℕ`, which are auxiliary to the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` congruent to the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ' (n : ℕ) : R[X] :=
preNormEDS' (W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) W.Ψ₃ W.preΨ₄ n
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_zero : W.preΨ' 0 = 0 :=
preNormEDS'_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_one : W.preΨ' 1 = 1 :=
preNormEDS'_one ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_two : W.preΨ' 2 = 1 :=
preNormEDS'_two ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_three : W.preΨ' 3 = W.Ψ₃ :=
preNormEDS'_three ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ'_four : W.preΨ' 4 = W.preΨ₄ :=
preNormEDS'_four ..
lemma preΨ'_even (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ' (2 * (m + 3)) =
W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 5) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS'_even ..
lemma preΨ'_odd (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ' (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.preΨ' (m + 4) * W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS'_odd ..
end preΨ'
section preΨ
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℤ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `preΨₙ` for `n ∈ ℤ`, which are auxiliary to the bivariate polynomials
`Ψₙ` congruent to the bivariate `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
noncomputable def preΨ (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
preNormEDS (W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) W.Ψ₃ W.preΨ₄ n
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.preΨ n = W.preΨ' n :=
preNormEDS_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_zero : W.preΨ 0 = 0 :=
preNormEDS_zero ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_one : W.preΨ 1 = 1 :=
preNormEDS_one ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_two : W.preΨ 2 = 1 :=
preNormEDS_two ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_three : W.preΨ 3 = W.Ψ₃ :=
preNormEDS_three ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_four : W.preΨ 4 = W.preΨ₄ :=
preNormEDS_four ..
lemma preΨ_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ (2 * (m + 3)) =
W.preΨ (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ (m + 3) * W.preΨ (m + 5) -
W.preΨ (m + 1) * W.preΨ (m + 3) * W.preΨ (m + 4) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS_even_ofNat ..
lemma preΨ_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.preΨ (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
W.preΨ (m + 4) * W.preΨ (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m + 1) * W.preΨ (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS_odd_ofNat ..
@[simp]
lemma preΨ_neg (n : ℤ) : W.preΨ (-n) = -W.preΨ n :=
preNormEDS_neg ..
lemma preΨ_even (m : ℤ) : W.preΨ (2 * m) =
W.preΨ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 2) -
W.preΨ (m - 2) * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 2 :=
preNormEDS_even ..
lemma preΨ_odd (m : ℤ) : W.preΨ (2 * m + 1) =
W.preΨ (m + 2) * W.preΨ m ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m - 1) * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2) :=
preNormEDS_odd ..
end preΨ
section ΨSq
/-! ### The univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ` -/
/-- The univariate polynomials `ΨSqₙ` congruent to `ψₙ²`. -/
noncomputable def ΨSq (n : ℤ) : R[X] :=
W.preΨ n ^ 2 * if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_ofNat (n : ℕ) : W.ΨSq n = W.preΨ' n ^ 2 * if Even n then W.Ψ₂Sq else 1 := by
simp only [ΨSq, preΨ_ofNat, Int.even_coe_nat]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_zero : W.ΨSq 0 = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero, zero_mul]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_one : W.ΨSq 1 = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_one, one_pow, one_mul, if_neg Nat.not_even_one]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_two : W.ΨSq 2 = W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_two, one_pow, one_mul, if_pos even_two]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_three : W.ΨSq 3 = W.Ψ₃ ^ 2 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_three, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_three, if_neg <| by decide, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_four : W.ΨSq 4 = W.preΨ₄ ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [← Nat.cast_four, ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_four, if_pos <| by decide]
lemma ΨSq_even_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.ΨSq (2 * (m + 3)) =
(W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 2 * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 5) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) * W.preΨ' (m + 4) ^ 2) ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw_mod_cast [ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_even, if_pos <| even_two_mul _]
lemma ΨSq_odd_ofNat (m : ℕ) : W.ΨSq (2 * (m + 2) + 1) =
(W.preΨ' (m + 4) * W.preΨ' (m + 2) ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ' (m + 1) * W.preΨ' (m + 3) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2)) ^ 2 := by
rw_mod_cast [ΨSq_ofNat, preΨ'_odd, if_neg (m + 2).not_even_two_mul_add_one, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma ΨSq_neg (n : ℤ) : W.ΨSq (-n) = W.ΨSq n := by
simp only [ΨSq, preΨ_neg, neg_sq, even_neg]
lemma ΨSq_even (m : ℤ) : W.ΨSq (2 * m) =
(W.preΨ (m - 1) ^ 2 * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 2) -
W.preΨ (m - 2) * W.preΨ m * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 2) ^ 2 * W.Ψ₂Sq := by
rw [ΨSq, preΨ_even, if_pos <| even_two_mul _]
lemma ΨSq_odd (m : ℤ) : W.ΨSq (2 * m + 1) =
(W.preΨ (m + 2) * W.preΨ m ^ 3 * (if Even m then W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2 else 1) -
W.preΨ (m - 1) * W.preΨ (m + 1) ^ 3 * (if Even m then 1 else W.Ψ₂Sq ^ 2)) ^ 2 := by
rw [ΨSq, preΨ_odd, if_neg m.not_even_two_mul_add_one, mul_one]
end ΨSq
section Ψ
/-! ### The bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ` -/
/-- The bivariate polynomials `Ψₙ` congruent to the `n`-division polynomials `ψₙ`. -/
protected noncomputable def Ψ (n : ℤ) : R[X][Y] :=
| C (W.preΨ n) * if Even n then W.ψ₂ else 1
open WeierstrassCurve (Ψ)
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/DivisionPolynomial/Basic.lean | 313 | 315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta.Basic
/-!
# Urysohn's lemma
In this file we prove Urysohn's lemma `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed`: for any two disjoint
closed sets `s` and `t` in a normal topological space `X` there exists a continuous function
`f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
We also give versions in a regular locally compact space where one assumes that `s` is compact
and `t` is closed, in `exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact`
and `exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact` (the latter providing additionally a function with
compact support).
We write a generic proof so that it applies both to normal spaces and to regular locally
compact spaces.
## Implementation notes
Most paper sources prove Urysohn's lemma using a family of open sets indexed by dyadic rational
numbers on `[0, 1]`. There are many technical difficulties with formalizing this proof (e.g., one
needs to formalize the "dyadic induction", then prove that the resulting family of open sets is
monotone). So, we formalize a slightly different proof.
Let `Urysohns.CU` be the type of pairs `(C, U)` of a closed set `C` and an open set `U` such that
`C ⊆ U`. Since `X` is a normal topological space, for each `c : CU` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u ∧ closure u ⊆ c.U`. We define `c.left` and `c.right` to be `(c.C, u)` and
`(closure u, c.U)`, respectively. Then we define a family of functions
`Urysohns.CU.approx (c : Urysohns.CU) (n : ℕ) : X → ℝ` by recursion on `n`:
* `c.approx 0` is the indicator of `c.Uᶜ`;
* `c.approx (n + 1) x = (c.left.approx n x + c.right.approx n x) / 2`.
For each `x` this is a monotone family of functions that are equal to zero on `c.C` and are equal to
one outside of `c.U`. We also have `c.approx n x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `c`, `n`, and `x`.
Let `Urysohns.CU.lim c` be the supremum (or equivalently, the limit) of `c.approx n`. Then
properties of `Urysohns.CU.approx` immediately imply that
* `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]` for all `x`;
* `c.lim` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
* `c.lim x = (c.left.lim x + c.right.lim x) / 2`.
In order to prove that `c.lim` is continuous at `x`, we prove by induction on `n : ℕ` that for `y`
in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `|c.lim y - c.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Induction base follows
from `c.lim x ∈ [0, 1]`, `c.lim y ∈ [0, 1]`. For the induction step, consider two cases:
* `x ∈ c.left.U`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have `y ∈ c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C`
(hence `c.right.lim x = c.right.lim y = 0`) and `|c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`.
Then
`|c.lim y - c.lim x| = |c.left.lim y - c.left.lim x| / 2 ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n / 2 < (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
* otherwise, `x ∉ c.left.right.C`; then for `y` in a small neighborhood of `x` we have
`y ∉ c.left.right.C ⊇ c.left.left.U` (hence `c.left.left.lim x = c.left.left.lim y = 1`),
`|c.left.right.lim y - c.left.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`, and
`|c.right.lim y - c.right.lim x| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ n`. Combining these inequalities, the triangle
inequality, and the recurrence formula for `c.lim`, we get
`|c.lim x - c.lim y| ≤ (3 / 4) ^ (n + 1)`.
The actual formalization uses `midpoint ℝ x y` instead of `(x + y) / 2` because we have more API
lemmas about `midpoint`.
## Tags
Urysohn's lemma, normal topological space, locally compact topological space
-/
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
/--
An auxiliary type for the proof of Urysohn's lemma: a pair of a closed set `C` and its open
neighborhood `U`, together with the assumption that `C` and `U` satisfy the property `P C U`.
The latter assumption will make it possible to prove simultaneously both versions of Urysohn's
lemma, in normal spaces (with `P` always true) and in locally compact spaces
(with `P C U = IsCompact C`). We put also in the structure the assumption that, for any such pair,
one may find an intermediate pair in between satisfying `P`,
to avoid carrying it around in the argument.
-/
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Set X → Prop) where
/-- The inner set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected C : Set X
/-- The outer set in the inductive construction towards Urysohn's lemma -/
protected U : Set X
/-- The proof that `C` and `U` satisfy the property `P C U` -/
protected P_C_U : P C U
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
/-- The proof that we can divide `CU` pairs in half -/
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c u → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ (v : Set X), IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P c v ∧ P (closure v) u
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Set X → Prop}
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.left` is the pair `(c.C, u)`. -/
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2.1
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
/-- By assumption, for each `c : CU P` there exists an open set `u`
such that `c.C ⊆ u` and `closure u ⊆ c.U`. `c.right` is the pair `(closure u, c.U)`. -/
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C_U c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
/-- `n`-th approximation to a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that `f = 0` on `c.C` and `f = 1`
outside of `c.U`. -/
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
theorem approx_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∉ c.U) : c.approx n x = 1 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
rw [← mem_compl_iff] at hx
exact indicator_of_mem hx _
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [hx, fun hU => hx <| c.left_U_subset hU]
theorem approx_nonneg (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.approx n x := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv]
refine mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 zero_le_two) (add_nonneg ?_ ?_) <;> apply ihn
theorem approx_le_one (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ 1 := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero => exact indicator_apply_le' (fun _ => le_rfl) fun _ => zero_le_one
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
have := add_le_add (ihn (left c)) (ihn (right c))
norm_num at this
exact Iff.mpr (div_le_one zero_lt_two) this
theorem bddAbove_range_approx (c : CU P) (x : X) : BddAbove (range fun n => c.approx n x) :=
⟨1, fun _ ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ c.approx_le_one n x⟩
theorem approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C {c₁ c₂ : CU P} (h : c₁.U ⊆ c₂.C) (n₁ n₂ : ℕ) (x : X) :
c₂.approx n₂ x ≤ c₁.approx n₁ x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ c₁.U
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x = 0 := approx_of_mem_C _ _ (h hx)
_ ≤ approx n₁ c₁ x := approx_nonneg _ _ _
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x ≤ 1 := approx_le_one _ _ _
_ = approx n₁ c₁ x := (approx_of_nmem_U _ _ hx).symm
theorem approx_mem_Icc_right_left (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) :
c.approx n x ∈ Icc (c.right.approx n x) (c.left.approx n x) := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
exact ⟨le_rfl, indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (compl_subset_compl.2 c.left_U_subset)
(fun _ => zero_le_one) _⟩
| succ n ihn =>
simp only [approx, mem_Icc]
refine ⟨midpoint_le_midpoint ?_ (ihn _).1, midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _).2 ?_⟩ <;>
apply approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C
exacts [subset_closure, subset_closure]
theorem approx_le_succ (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ c.approx (n + 1) x := by
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
simp only [approx, right_U, right_le_midpoint]
exact (approx_mem_Icc_right_left c 0 x).2
| succ n ihn =>
rw [approx, approx]
exact midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _) (ihn _)
theorem approx_mono (c : CU P) (x : X) : Monotone fun n => c.approx n x :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => c.approx_le_succ n x
/-- A continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`;
* `f` equals zero on `c.C` and equals one outside of `c.U`;
-/
protected noncomputable def lim (c : CU P) (x : X) : ℝ :=
⨆ n, c.approx n x
theorem tendsto_approx_atTop (c : CU P) (x : X) :
Tendsto (fun n => c.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 <| c.lim x) :=
tendsto_atTop_ciSup (c.approx_mono x) ⟨1, fun _ ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ c.approx_le_one _ _⟩
theorem lim_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (x : X) (h : x ∈ c.C) : c.lim x = 0 := by
simp only [CU.lim, approx_of_mem_C, h, ciSup_const]
theorem disjoint_C_support_lim (c : CU P) : Disjoint c.C (Function.support c.lim) :=
Function.disjoint_support_iff.mpr (fun x hx => lim_of_mem_C c x hx)
theorem lim_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (x : X) (h : x ∉ c.U) : c.lim x = 1 := by
simp only [CU.lim, approx_of_nmem_U c _ h, ciSup_const]
theorem lim_eq_midpoint (c : CU P) (x : X) :
c.lim x = midpoint ℝ (c.left.lim x) (c.right.lim x) := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (c.tendsto_approx_atTop x) ((tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 ?_)
simp only [approx]
exact (c.left.tendsto_approx_atTop x).midpoint (c.right.tendsto_approx_atTop x)
theorem approx_le_lim (c : CU P) (x : X) (n : ℕ) : c.approx n x ≤ c.lim x :=
le_ciSup (c.bddAbove_range_approx x) _
theorem lim_nonneg (c : CU P) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.lim x :=
(c.approx_nonneg 0 x).trans (c.approx_le_lim x 0)
theorem lim_le_one (c : CU P) (x : X) : c.lim x ≤ 1 :=
ciSup_le fun _ => c.approx_le_one _ _
theorem lim_mem_Icc (c : CU P) (x : X) : c.lim x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨c.lim_nonneg x, c.lim_le_one x⟩
/-- Continuity of `Urysohns.CU.lim`. See module docstring for a sketch of the proofs. -/
theorem continuous_lim (c : CU P) : Continuous c.lim := by
obtain ⟨h0, h1234, h1⟩ : 0 < (2⁻¹ : ℝ) ∧ (2⁻¹ : ℝ) < 3 / 4 ∧ (3 / 4 : ℝ) < 1 := by norm_num
refine
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
(Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall_pow (h0.trans h1234) h1).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun n _ => ?_
simp only [Metric.mem_closedBall]
induction n generalizing c with
| zero =>
filter_upwards with y
rw [pow_zero]
exact Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 (c.lim_mem_Icc _) (c.lim_mem_Icc _)
| succ n ihn =>
by_cases hxl : x ∈ c.left.U
· filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds c.left.open_U hxl, ihn c.left] with _ hyl hyd
rw [pow_succ', c.lim_eq_midpoint, c.lim_eq_midpoint,
c.right.lim_of_mem_C _ (c.left_U_subset_right_C hyl),
c.right.lim_of_mem_C _ (c.left_U_subset_right_C hxl)]
refine (dist_midpoint_midpoint_le _ _ _ _).trans ?_
rw [dist_self, add_zero, div_eq_inv_mul]
gcongr
· replace hxl : x ∈ c.left.right.Cᶜ :=
compl_subset_compl.2 c.left.right.subset hxl
filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_compl_iff.2 c.left.right.closed_C) hxl,
ihn c.left.right, ihn c.right] with y hyl hydl hydr
replace hxl : x ∉ c.left.left.U :=
compl_subset_compl.2 c.left.left_U_subset_right_C hxl
replace hyl : y ∉ c.left.left.U :=
compl_subset_compl.2 c.left.left_U_subset_right_C hyl
simp only [pow_succ, c.lim_eq_midpoint, c.left.lim_eq_midpoint,
c.left.left.lim_of_nmem_U _ hxl, c.left.left.lim_of_nmem_U _ hyl]
refine (dist_midpoint_midpoint_le _ _ _ _).trans ?_
refine (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (add_le_add_right (dist_midpoint_midpoint_le _ _ _ _) _)
zero_le_two).trans ?_
rw [dist_self, zero_add]
set r := (3 / 4 : ℝ) ^ n
calc _ ≤ (r / 2 + r) / 2 := by gcongr
_ = _ := by field_simp; ring
end CU
end Urysohns
/-- Urysohn's lemma: if `s` and `t` are two disjoint closed sets in a normal topological space `X`,
then there exists a continuous function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
-/
theorem exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed [NormalSpace X]
{s t : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t)
(hd : Disjoint s t) : ∃ f : C(X, ℝ), EqOn f 0 s ∧ EqOn f 1 t ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
-- The actual proof is in the code above. Here we just repack it into the expected format.
let P : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun _ _ ↦ True
set c : Urysohns.CU P :=
{ C := s
U := tᶜ
P_C_U := trivial
closed_C := hs
open_U := ht.isOpen_compl
subset := disjoint_left.1 hd
hP := by
rintro c u c_closed - u_open cu
rcases normal_exists_closure_subset c_closed u_open cu with ⟨v, v_open, cv, hv⟩
exact ⟨v, v_open, cv, hv, trivial, trivial⟩ }
exact ⟨⟨c.lim, c.continuous_lim⟩, c.lim_of_mem_C, fun x hx => c.lim_of_nmem_U _ fun h => h hx,
c.lim_mem_Icc⟩
/-- Urysohn's lemma: if `s` and `t` are two disjoint sets in a regular locally compact topological
space `X`, with `s` compact and `t` closed, then there exists a continuous
function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `s`;
* `f` equals one on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
-/
theorem exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact [RegularSpace X] [LocallyCompactSpace X]
{s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hd : Disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C(X, ℝ), EqOn f 0 s ∧ EqOn f 1 t ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
obtain ⟨k, k_comp, k_closed, sk, kt⟩ : ∃ k, IsCompact k ∧ IsClosed k ∧ s ⊆ interior k ∧ k ⊆ tᶜ :=
exists_compact_closed_between hs ht.isOpen_compl hd.symm.subset_compl_left
let P : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun C _ => IsCompact C
set c : Urysohns.CU P :=
{ C := k
U := tᶜ
P_C_U := k_comp
closed_C := k_closed
open_U := ht.isOpen_compl
subset := kt
hP := by
rintro c u - c_comp u_open cu
rcases exists_compact_closed_between c_comp u_open cu with ⟨k, k_comp, k_closed, ck, ku⟩
have A : closure (interior k) ⊆ k :=
(IsClosed.closure_subset_iff k_closed).2 interior_subset
refine ⟨interior k, isOpen_interior, ck, A.trans ku, c_comp,
k_comp.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure A⟩ }
exact ⟨⟨c.lim, c.continuous_lim⟩, fun x hx ↦ c.lim_of_mem_C _ (sk.trans interior_subset hx),
fun x hx => c.lim_of_nmem_U _ fun h => h hx, c.lim_mem_Icc⟩
/-- Urysohn's lemma: if `s` and `t` are two disjoint sets in a regular locally compact topological
space `X`, with `s` compact and `t` closed, then there exists a continuous
function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals zero on `t`;
* `f` equals one on `s`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
-/
theorem exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact' [RegularSpace X] [LocallyCompactSpace X]
{s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hd : Disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C(X, ℝ), EqOn f 0 t ∧ EqOn f 1 s ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
obtain ⟨g, hgs, hgt, (hicc : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g x ∧ g x ≤ 1)⟩ := exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isCompact
hs ht hd
use 1 - g
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro x hx
simp only [ContinuousMap.sub_apply, ContinuousMap.one_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
exact sub_eq_zero_of_eq (id (EqOn.symm hgt) hx)
| · intro x hx
simp only [ContinuousMap.sub_apply, ContinuousMap.one_apply, Pi.one_apply, sub_eq_self]
exact hgs hx
· intro x
simpa [and_comm] using hicc x
/-- Urysohn's lemma: if `s` and `t` are two disjoint sets in a regular locally compact topological
space `X`, with `s` compact and `t` closed, then there exists a continuous compactly supported
function `f : X → ℝ` such that
* `f` equals one on `s`;
* `f` equals zero on `t`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
-/
theorem exists_continuous_one_zero_of_isCompact [RegularSpace X] [LocallyCompactSpace X]
{s t : Set X} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hd : Disjoint s t) :
∃ f : C(X, ℝ), EqOn f 1 s ∧ EqOn f 0 t ∧ HasCompactSupport f ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
obtain ⟨k, k_comp, k_closed, sk, kt⟩ : ∃ k, IsCompact k ∧ IsClosed k ∧ s ⊆ interior k ∧ k ⊆ tᶜ :=
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 385 | 402 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 767 | 774 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Rat
/-!
# Field and action structures on the nonnegative rationals
This file provides additional results about `NNRat` that cannot live in earlier files due to import
cycles.
-/
open Function
open scoped NNRat
namespace NNRat
variable {α : Type*} {q : ℚ≥0}
/-- A `MulAction` over `ℚ` restricts to a `MulAction` over `ℚ≥0`. -/
instance [MulAction ℚ α] : MulAction ℚ≥0 α :=
MulAction.compHom α coeHom.toMonoidHom
/-- A `DistribMulAction` over `ℚ` restricts to a `DistribMulAction` over `ℚ≥0`. -/
instance [AddCommMonoid α] [DistribMulAction ℚ α] : DistribMulAction ℚ≥0 α :=
DistribMulAction.compHom α coeHom.toMonoidHom
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → ℚ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = s.indicator (fun x ↦ ↑(f x)) a :=
(coeHom : ℚ≥0 →+ ℚ).map_indicator _ _ _
end NNRat
open NNRat
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
lemma toNNRat_inv (q : ℚ) : toNNRat q⁻¹ = (toNNRat q)⁻¹ := by
obtain hq | hq := le_total q 0
| · rw [toNNRat_eq_zero.mpr hq, inv_zero, toNNRat_eq_zero.mpr (inv_nonpos.mpr hq)]
· nth_rw 1 [← Rat.coe_toNNRat q hq]
rw [← coe_inv, toNNRat_coe]
lemma toNNRat_div (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat (p / q) = toNNRat p / toNNRat q := by
| Mathlib/Data/NNRat/Lemmas.lean | 47 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
/-!
# Non integrable functions
In this file we prove that the derivative of a function that tends to infinity is not interval
integrable, see `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter` and
`not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured`. Then we apply the
latter lemma to prove that the function `fun x => x⁻¹` is integrable on `a..b` if and only if
`a = b` or `0 ∉ [a, b]`.
## Main results
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured`: if `f` tends to infinity
along `𝓝[≠] c` and `f' = O(g)` along the same filter, then `g` is not interval integrable on any
nontrivial integral `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`.
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter`: a version of
`not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured` that works for one-sided
neighborhoods;
* `not_intervalIntegrable_of_sub_inv_isBigO_punctured`: if `1 / (x - c) = O(f)` as `x → c`, `x ≠ c`,
then `f` is not interval integrable on any nontrivial interval `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`;
* `intervalIntegrable_sub_inv_iff`, `intervalIntegrable_inv_iff`: integrability conditions for
`(x - c)⁻¹` and `x⁻¹`.
## Tags
integrable function
-/
open scoped MeasureTheory Topology Interval NNReal ENNReal
open MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Set Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
variable {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
/-- If `f` is eventually differentiable along a nontrivial filter `l : Filter ℝ` that is generated
by convex sets, the norm of `f` tends to infinity along `l`, and `f' = O(g)` along `l`, where `f'`
is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not integrable on any set `k` belonging to `l`.
Auxiliary version assuming that `E` is complete. -/
theorem not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter_aux
[CompleteSpace E] {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{k : Set ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l]
(hl : k ∈ l) (hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntegrableOn g k := by
intro hgi
obtain ⟨C, hC₀, s, hsl, hsub, hfd, hg⟩ :
∃ (C : ℝ) (_ : 0 ≤ C), ∃ s ∈ l, (∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, [[x, y]] ⊆ k) ∧
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ [[x, y]], DifferentiableAt ℝ f z) ∧
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∀ z ∈ [[x, y]], ‖deriv f z‖ ≤ C * ‖g z‖ := by
rcases hfg.exists_nonneg with ⟨C, C₀, hC⟩
have h : ∀ᶠ x : ℝ × ℝ in l ×ˢ l,
∀ y ∈ [[x.1, x.2]], (DifferentiableAt ℝ f y ∧ ‖deriv f y‖ ≤ C * ‖g y‖) ∧ y ∈ k :=
(tendsto_fst.uIcc tendsto_snd).eventually ((hd.and hC.bound).and hl).smallSets
rcases mem_prod_self_iff.1 h with ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩
simp only [prod_subset_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hs
exact ⟨C, C₀, s, hsl, fun x hx y hy z hz => (hs x hx y hy z hz).2, fun x hx y hy z hz =>
(hs x hx y hy z hz).1.1, fun x hx y hy z hz => (hs x hx y hy z hz).1.2⟩
replace hgi : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ C * ‖g x‖) k := by exact hgi.norm.smul C
obtain ⟨c, hc, d, hd, hlt⟩ : ∃ c ∈ s, ∃ d ∈ s, (‖f c‖ + ∫ y in k, C * ‖g y‖) < ‖f d‖ := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem hsl with ⟨c, hc⟩
have : ∀ᶠ x in l, (‖f c‖ + ∫ y in k, C * ‖g y‖) < ‖f x‖ :=
hf.eventually (eventually_gt_atTop _)
exact ⟨c, hc, (this.and hsl).exists.imp fun d hd => ⟨hd.2, hd.1⟩⟩
specialize hsub c hc d hd; specialize hfd c hc d hd
replace hg : ∀ x ∈ Ι c d, ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ :=
fun z hz => hg c hc d hd z ⟨hz.1.le, hz.2⟩
have hg_ae : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict (Ι c d), ‖deriv f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ :=
(ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_uIoc).mono hg
have hsub' : Ι c d ⊆ k := Subset.trans Ioc_subset_Icc_self hsub
have hfi : IntervalIntegrable (deriv f) volume c d := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
have : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ C * ‖g x‖) (Ι c d) := IntegrableOn.mono hgi hsub' le_rfl
exact Integrable.mono' this (aestronglyMeasurable_deriv _ _) hg_ae
refine hlt.not_le (sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 ?_)
calc
‖f d‖ - ‖f c‖ ≤ ‖f d - f c‖ := norm_sub_norm_le _ _
_ = ‖∫ x in c..d, deriv f x‖ := congr_arg _ (integral_deriv_eq_sub hfd hfi).symm
_ = ‖∫ x in Ι c d, deriv f x‖ := norm_integral_eq_norm_integral_uIoc _
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι c d, ‖deriv f x‖ := norm_integral_le_integral_norm _
_ ≤ ∫ x in Ι c d, C * ‖g x‖ :=
setIntegral_mono_on hfi.norm.def' (hgi.mono_set hsub') measurableSet_uIoc hg
_ ≤ ∫ x in k, C * ‖g x‖ := by
apply setIntegral_mono_set hgi
(ae_of_all _ fun x => mul_nonneg hC₀ (norm_nonneg _)) hsub'.eventuallyLE
theorem not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter
{f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{k : Set ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l]
(hl : k ∈ l) (hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntegrableOn g k := by
let a : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] UniformSpace.Completion E := UniformSpace.Completion.toComplₗᵢ
let f' := a ∘ f
have h'd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f' x := by
filter_upwards [hd] with x hx using a.toContinuousLinearMap.differentiableAt.comp x hx
have h'f : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f' x‖) l atTop := hf.congr (fun x ↦ by simp [f'])
have h'fg : deriv f' =O[l] g := by
apply IsBigO.trans _ hfg
rw [← isBigO_norm_norm]
suffices (fun x ↦ ‖deriv f' x‖) =ᶠ[l] (fun x ↦ ‖deriv f x‖) by exact this.isBigO
filter_upwards [hd] with x hx
have : deriv f' x = a (deriv f x) := by
rw [fderiv_comp_deriv x _ hx]
· have : fderiv ℝ a (f x) = a.toContinuousLinearMap := a.toContinuousLinearMap.fderiv
simp only [this]
rfl
· exact a.toContinuousLinearMap.differentiableAt
simp only [this]
simp
exact not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter_aux l hl h'd h'f h'fg
/-- If `f` is eventually differentiable along a nontrivial filter `l : Filter ℝ` that is generated
by convex sets, the norm of `f` tends to infinity along `l`, and `f' = O(g)` along `l`, where `f'`
is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not integrable on any interval `a..b` such that
`[a, b] ∈ l`. -/
theorem not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F}
{a b : ℝ} (l : Filter ℝ) [NeBot l] [TendstoIxxClass Icc l l] (hl : [[a, b]] ∈ l)
(hd : ∀ᶠ x in l, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hf : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop)
(hfg : deriv f =O[l] g) : ¬IntervalIntegrable g volume a b := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff']
exact not_integrableOn_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter _ hl hd hf hfg
/-- If `a ≠ b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`, `f` is differentiable in the neighborhood of `c` within
`[a, b] \ {c}`, `‖f x‖ → ∞` as `x → c` within `[a, b] \ {c}`, and `f' = O(g)` along
`𝓝[[a, b] \ {c}] c`, where `f'` is the derivative of `f`, then `g` is not interval integrable on
`a..b`. -/
theorem not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_within_diff_singleton
{f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → F} {a b c : ℝ} (hne : a ≠ b) (hc : c ∈ [[a, b]])
(h_deriv : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h_infty : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) (𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c) atTop)
(hg : deriv f =O[𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c] g) : ¬IntervalIntegrable g volume a b := by
obtain ⟨l, hl, hl', hle, hmem⟩ :
∃ l : Filter ℝ, TendstoIxxClass Icc l l ∧ l.NeBot ∧ l ≤ 𝓝 c ∧ [[a, b]] \ {c} ∈ l := by
rcases (min_lt_max.2 hne).lt_or_lt c with hlt | hlt
· refine ⟨𝓝[<] c, inferInstance, inferInstance, inf_le_left, ?_⟩
rw [← Iic_diff_right]
exact diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff (Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem ⟨hlt, hc.2⟩) _
· refine ⟨𝓝[>] c, inferInstance, inferInstance, inf_le_left, ?_⟩
rw [← Ici_diff_left]
exact diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff (Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem ⟨hc.1, hlt⟩) _
have : l ≤ 𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c := le_inf hle (le_principal_iff.2 hmem)
exact not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_filter l
(mem_of_superset hmem diff_subset) (h_deriv.filter_mono this) (h_infty.mono_left this)
(hg.mono this)
/-- If `f` is differentiable in a punctured neighborhood of `c`, `‖f x‖ → ∞` as `x → c` (more
formally, along the filter `𝓝[≠] c`), and `f' = O(g)` along `𝓝[≠] c`, where `f'` is the derivative
of `f`, then `g` is not interval integrable on any nontrivial interval `a..b` such that
`c ∈ [a, b]`. -/
theorem not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured {f : ℝ → E}
{g : ℝ → F} {a b c : ℝ} (h_deriv : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] c, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(h_infty : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) (𝓝[≠] c) atTop) (hg : deriv f =O[𝓝[≠] c] g) (hne : a ≠ b)
(hc : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : ¬IntervalIntegrable g volume a b :=
have : 𝓝[[[a, b]] \ {c}] c ≤ 𝓝[≠] c := nhdsWithin_mono _ inter_subset_right
not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_within_diff_singleton hne hc
(h_deriv.filter_mono this) (h_infty.mono_left this) (hg.mono this)
/-- If `f` grows in the punctured neighborhood of `c : ℝ` at least as fast as `1 / (x - c)`,
then it is not interval integrable on any nontrivial interval `a..b`, `c ∈ [a, b]`. -/
theorem not_intervalIntegrable_of_sub_inv_isBigO_punctured {f : ℝ → F} {a b c : ℝ}
(hf : (fun x => (x - c)⁻¹) =O[𝓝[≠] c] f) (hne : a ≠ b) (hc : c ∈ [[a, b]]) :
¬IntervalIntegrable f volume a b := by
have A : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] c, HasDerivAt (fun x => Real.log (x - c)) (x - c)⁻¹ x := by
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx
simpa using ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub_const c).log (sub_ne_zero.2 hx)
have B : Tendsto (fun x => ‖Real.log (x - c)‖) (𝓝[≠] c) atTop := by
refine tendsto_abs_atBot_atTop.comp (Real.tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero.comp ?_)
| rw [← sub_self c]
exact ((hasDerivAt_id c).sub_const c).tendsto_nhdsNE one_ne_zero
exact not_intervalIntegrable_of_tendsto_norm_atTop_of_deriv_isBigO_punctured
(A.mono fun x hx => hx.differentiableAt) B
(hf.congr' (A.mono fun x hx => hx.deriv.symm) EventuallyEq.rfl) hne hc
/-- The function `fun x => (x - c)⁻¹` is integrable on `a..b` if and only if
`a = b` or `c ∉ [a, b]`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_sub_inv_iff {a b c : ℝ} :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (x - c)⁻¹) volume a b ↔ a = b ∨ c ∉ [[a, b]] := by
constructor
· refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hne hc => ?_
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/NonIntegrable.lean | 177 | 189 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Deepro Choudhury, Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.RootSystem.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.RootSystem.Finite.Nondegenerate
/-!
# Root data and root systems
This file contains basic results for root systems and root data.
## Main definitions / results:
* `RootPairing.ext`: In characteristic zero if there is no torsion, the correspondence between
roots and coroots is unique.
* `RootSystem.ext`: In characteristic zero if there is no torsion, a root system is determined
entirely by its roots.
* `RootPairing.mk'`: In characteristic zero if there is no torsion, to check that two finite
families of roots and coroots form a root pairing, it is sufficient to check that they are
stable under reflections.
* `RootSystem.mk'`: In characteristic zero if there is no torsion, to check that a finite family of
roots form a root system, we do not need to check that the coroots are stable under reflections
since this follows from the corresponding property for the roots.
-/
open Set Function
open Module hiding reflection
open Submodule (span)
open AddSubgroup (zmultiples)
noncomputable section
variable {ι R M N : Type*}
[CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
namespace RootPairing
section reflection_perm
variable (p : PerfectPairing R M N) (root : ι ↪ M) (coroot : ι ↪ N) (i j : ι)
(h : ∀ i, MapsTo (preReflection (root i) (p.toLinearMap.flip (coroot i)))
(range root) (range root))
include h
private theorem exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo :
∃ k, root k = (preReflection (root i) (p.flip (coroot i))) (root j) :=
h i (mem_range_self j)
variable (hp : ∀ i, p.toLinearMap (root i) (coroot i) = 2)
include hp
private theorem choose_choose_eq_of_mapsTo :
(exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo p root coroot i
(exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo p root coroot i j h).choose h).choose = j := by
refine root.injective ?_
rw [(exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo p root coroot i _ h).choose_spec,
(exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo p root coroot i j h).choose_spec]
apply involutive_preReflection (x := root i) (hp i)
/-- The bijection on the indexing set induced by reflection. -/
@[simps]
protected def equiv_of_mapsTo :
ι ≃ ι where
toFun j := (exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo p root coroot i j h).choose
invFun j := (exist_eq_reflection_of_mapsTo p root coroot i j h).choose
left_inv j := choose_choose_eq_of_mapsTo p root coroot i j h hp
right_inv j := choose_choose_eq_of_mapsTo p root coroot i j h hp
end reflection_perm
variable (P : RootPairing ι R M N) [Finite ι]
/-- Even though the roots may not span, coroots are distinguished by their pairing with the
roots. The proof depends crucially on the fact that there are finitely-many roots.
Modulo trivial generalisations, this statement is exactly Lemma 1.1.4 on page 87 of SGA 3 XXI. -/
lemma injOn_dualMap_subtype_span_root_coroot [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ M] :
InjOn ((span R (range P.root)).subtype.dualMap ∘ₗ P.toLinearMap.flip) (range P.coroot) := by
have := injOn_dualMap_subtype_span_range_range (finite_range P.root)
(c := P.toLinearMap.flip ∘ P.coroot) P.root_coroot_two P.mapsTo_reflection_root
rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩ - ⟨j, rfl⟩ hij
exact P.bijective_right.injective <| this (mem_range_self i) (mem_range_self j) hij
/-- In characteristic zero if there is no torsion, the correspondence between roots and coroots is
unique.
Formally, the point is that the hypothesis `hc` depends only on the range of the coroot mappings. -/
@[ext]
protected lemma ext [CharZero R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
{P₁ P₂ : RootPairing ι R M N}
(he : P₁.toPerfectPairing = P₂.toPerfectPairing)
(hr : P₁.root = P₂.root)
(hc : range P₁.coroot = range P₂.coroot) :
P₁ = P₂ := by
have hp (hc' : P₁.coroot = P₂.coroot) : P₁.reflection_perm = P₂.reflection_perm := by
ext i j
refine P₁.root.injective ?_
conv_rhs => rw [hr]
simp only [root_reflection_perm, reflection_apply, coroot']
simp only [hr, he, hc']
suffices P₁.coroot = P₂.coroot by
obtain ⟨p₁⟩ := P₁; obtain ⟨p₂⟩ := P₂; cases p₁; cases p₂; congr; exact hp this
have := NoZeroSMulDivisors.int_of_charZero R M
ext i
apply P₁.injOn_dualMap_subtype_span_root_coroot (mem_range_self i) (hc ▸ mem_range_self i)
simp only [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply]
apply Dual.eq_of_preReflection_mapsTo' (finite_range P₁.root)
· exact Submodule.subset_span (mem_range_self i)
· exact P₁.coroot_root_two i
· exact P₁.mapsTo_reflection_root i
· exact hr ▸ he ▸ P₂.coroot_root_two i
· exact hr ▸ he ▸ P₂.mapsTo_reflection_root i
private lemma coroot_eq_coreflection_of_root_eq' [CharZero R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(p : PerfectPairing R M N)
(root : ι ↪ M)
| (coroot : ι ↪ N)
(hp : ∀ i, p (root i) (coroot i) = 2)
(hr : ∀ i, MapsTo (preReflection (root i) (p.flip (coroot i))) (range root) (range root))
(hc : ∀ i, MapsTo (preReflection (coroot i) (p (root i))) (range coroot) (range coroot))
{i j k : ι} (hk : root k = preReflection (root i) (p.flip (coroot i)) (root j)) :
coroot k = preReflection (coroot i) (p (root i)) (coroot j) := by
set α := root i
set β := root j
set α' := coroot i
set β' := coroot j
set sα := preReflection α (p.flip α')
set sβ := preReflection β (p.flip β')
let sα' := preReflection α' (p α)
have hij : preReflection (sα β) (p.flip (sα' β')) = sα ∘ₗ sβ ∘ₗ sα := by
ext
have hpi : (p.flip (coroot i)) (root i) = 2 := by rw [PerfectPairing.flip_apply_apply, hp i]
simp [α, β, α', β', sα, sβ, sα', ← preReflection_preReflection β (p.flip β') hpi,
preReflection_apply]
have hk₀ : root k ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ by simpa [h, ← PerfectPairing.toLinearMap_apply] using hp k
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := hc i (mem_range_self j)
rw [← hl]
have hkl : (p.flip (coroot l)) (root k) = 2 := by
simp only [hl, preReflection_apply, hk, PerfectPairing.flip_apply_apply, map_sub, hp j,
map_smul, smul_eq_mul, hp i, mul_sub, sα, α, α', β, mul_two, mul_add, LinearMap.sub_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply]
rw [mul_comm (p (root i) (coroot j))]
abel
suffices p.flip (coroot k) = p.flip (coroot l) from p.bijective_right.injective this
have _i : NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ M := NoZeroSMulDivisors.int_of_charZero R M
have := injOn_dualMap_subtype_span_range_range (finite_range root)
(c := p.flip ∘ coroot) hp hr
apply this (mem_range_self k) (mem_range_self l)
refine Dual.eq_of_preReflection_mapsTo' (finite_range root)
(Submodule.subset_span <| mem_range_self k) (hp k) (hr k) hkl ?_
rw [comp_apply, hl, hk, hij]
exact (hr i).comp <| (hr j).comp (hr i)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/RootSystem/Basic.lean | 120 | 156 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm.Subperm
/-!
# Prime numbers
This file deals with the factors of natural numbers.
## Important declarations
- `Nat.factors n`: the prime factorization of `n`
- `Nat.factors_unique`: uniqueness of the prime factorisation
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- `primeFactorsList n` is the prime factorization of `n`, listed in increasing order. -/
def primeFactorsList : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| 1 => []
| k + 2 =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
m :: primeFactorsList ((k + 2) / m)
decreasing_by exact factors_lemma
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_zero : primeFactorsList 0 = [] := by rw [primeFactorsList]
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_one : primeFactorsList 1 = [] := by rw [primeFactorsList]
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_two : primeFactorsList 2 = [2] := by simp [primeFactorsList]
theorem prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList {n : ℕ} : ∀ {p : ℕ}, p ∈ primeFactorsList n → Prime p := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro p h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
have h₁ : p = m ∨ p ∈ primeFactorsList ((k + 2) / m) :=
List.mem_cons.1 (by rwa [primeFactorsList] at h)
exact Or.casesOn h₁ (fun h₂ => h₂.symm ▸ minFac_prime (by simp)) prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
theorem pos_of_mem_primeFactorsList {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ primeFactorsList n) : 0 < p :=
Prime.pos (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList h)
theorem prod_primeFactorsList : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → List.prod (primeFactorsList n) = n
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| k + 2 => fun _ =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
show (primeFactorsList (k + 2)).prod = (k + 2) by
have h₁ : (k + 2) / m ≠ 0 := fun h => by
have : (k + 2) = 0 * m := (Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left (minFac_pos _) (minFac_dvd _)).1 h
rw [zero_mul] at this; exact (show k + 2 ≠ 0 by simp) this
rw [primeFactorsList, List.prod_cons, prod_primeFactorsList h₁,
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (minFac_dvd _)]
theorem primeFactorsList_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : p.primeFactorsList = [p] := by
have : p = p - 2 + 2 := Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hp.two_le rfl
rw [this, primeFactorsList]
simp only [Eq.symm this]
have : Nat.minFac p = p := (Nat.prime_def_minFac.mp hp).2
simp only [this, primeFactorsList, Nat.div_self (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
theorem primeFactorsList_chain {n : ℕ} :
∀ {a}, (∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → a ≤ p) → List.Chain (· ≤ ·) a (primeFactorsList n) := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro a h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
rw [primeFactorsList]
refine List.Chain.cons ((le_minFac.2 h).resolve_left (by simp)) (primeFactorsList_chain ?_)
exact fun p pp d => minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le (d.trans <| div_dvd_of_dvd <| minFac_dvd _)
theorem primeFactorsList_chain_2 (n) : List.Chain (· ≤ ·) 2 (primeFactorsList n) :=
primeFactorsList_chain fun _ pp _ => pp.two_le
theorem primeFactorsList_chain' (n) : List.Chain' (· ≤ ·) (primeFactorsList n) :=
@List.Chain'.tail _ _ (_ :: _) (primeFactorsList_chain_2 _)
theorem primeFactorsList_sorted (n : ℕ) : List.Sorted (· ≤ ·) (primeFactorsList n) :=
List.chain'_iff_pairwise.1 (primeFactorsList_chain' _)
/-- `primeFactorsList` can be constructed inductively by extracting `minFac`, for sufficiently
large `n`. -/
theorem primeFactorsList_add_two (n : ℕ) :
primeFactorsList (n + 2) = minFac (n + 2) :: primeFactorsList ((n + 2) / minFac (n + 2)) := by
rw [primeFactorsList]
@[simp]
theorem primeFactorsList_eq_nil (n : ℕ) : n.primeFactorsList = [] ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
· rw [primeFactorsList] at h
injection h
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· exact primeFactorsList_zero
· exact primeFactorsList_one
open scoped List in
theorem eq_of_perm_primeFactorsList {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(h : a.primeFactorsList ~ b.primeFactorsList) : a = b := by
simpa [prod_primeFactorsList ha, prod_primeFactorsList hb] using List.Perm.prod_eq h
section
open List
theorem mem_primeFactorsList_iff_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : Prime p) :
p ∈ primeFactorsList n ↔ p ∣ n where
mp h := prod_primeFactorsList hn ▸ List.dvd_prod h
mpr h := mem_list_primes_of_dvd_prod (prime_iff.mp hp)
(fun _ h ↦ prime_iff.mp (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList h)) ((prod_primeFactorsList hn).symm ▸ h)
theorem dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primeFactorsList) : p ∣ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· exact dvd_zero p
· rwa [← mem_primeFactorsList_iff_dvd hn.ne' (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList h)]
theorem mem_primeFactorsList {n p} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∈ primeFactorsList n ↔ Prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun h => ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList h, dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList h⟩, fun ⟨hprime, hdvd⟩ =>
(mem_primeFactorsList_iff_dvd hn hprime).mpr hdvd⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_primeFactorsList' {n p} : p ∈ n.primeFactorsList ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
cases n <;> simp [mem_primeFactorsList, *]
theorem le_of_mem_primeFactorsList {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primeFactorsList) : p ≤ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· rw [primeFactorsList_zero] at h
cases h
· exact le_of_dvd hn (dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList h)
/-- **Fundamental theorem of arithmetic** -/
theorem primeFactorsList_unique {n : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (h₁ : prod l = n) (h₂ : ∀ p ∈ l, Prime p) :
l ~ primeFactorsList n := by
refine perm_of_prod_eq_prod ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [h₁]
refine (prod_primeFactorsList ?_).symm
rintro rfl
rw [prod_eq_zero_iff] at h₁
exact Prime.ne_zero (h₂ 0 h₁) rfl
· simp_rw [← prime_iff]
exact h₂
· simp_rw [← prime_iff]
exact fun p => prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
theorem Prime.primeFactorsList_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).primeFactorsList = List.replicate n p := by
symm
rw [← List.replicate_perm]
apply Nat.primeFactorsList_unique (List.prod_replicate n p)
intro q hq
rwa [eq_of_mem_replicate hq]
theorem eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hpos : n ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ {d}, Nat.Prime d → d ∣ n → d = p) : n = p ^ n.primeFactorsList.length := by
set k := n.primeFactorsList.length
rw [← prod_primeFactorsList hpos, ← prod_replicate k p, eq_replicate_of_mem fun d hd =>
h (prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hd) (dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hd)]
/-- For positive `a` and `b`, the prime factors of `a * b` are the union of those of `a` and `b` -/
theorem perm_primeFactorsList_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).primeFactorsList ~ a.primeFactorsList ++ b.primeFactorsList := by
refine (primeFactorsList_unique ?_ ?_).symm
· rw [List.prod_append, prod_primeFactorsList ha, prod_primeFactorsList hb]
· intro p hp
rw [List.mem_append] at hp
rcases hp with hp' | hp' <;> exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp'
/-- For coprime `a` and `b`, the prime factors of `a * b` are the union of those of `a` and `b` -/
theorem perm_primeFactorsList_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).primeFactorsList ~ a.primeFactorsList ++ b.primeFactorsList := by
rcases a.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | ha)
· simp [(coprime_zero_left _).mp hab]
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· simp [(coprime_zero_right _).mp hab]
exact perm_primeFactorsList_mul ha.ne' hb.ne'
theorem primeFactorsList_sublist_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≠ 0) :
n.primeFactorsList <+ (n * k).primeFactorsList := by
rcases n with - | hn
· simp [zero_mul]
apply sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted _ (primeFactorsList_sorted _) (primeFactorsList_sorted _)
simp only [(perm_primeFactorsList_mul (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) h).subperm_left]
exact (sublist_append_left _ _).subperm
theorem primeFactorsList_sublist_of_dvd {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∣ k) (h' : k ≠ 0) :
n.primeFactorsList <+ k.primeFactorsList := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := h
exact primeFactorsList_sublist_right (right_ne_zero_of_mul h')
theorem primeFactorsList_subset_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≠ 0) :
n.primeFactorsList ⊆ (n * k).primeFactorsList :=
(primeFactorsList_sublist_right h).subset
theorem primeFactorsList_subset_of_dvd {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∣ k) (h' : k ≠ 0) :
n.primeFactorsList ⊆ k.primeFactorsList :=
(primeFactorsList_sublist_of_dvd h h').subset
theorem dvd_of_primeFactorsList_subperm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h : a.primeFactorsList <+~ b.primeFactorsList) : a ∣ b := by
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· exact dvd_zero _
rcases a with (_ | _ | a)
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· exact one_dvd _
use (b.primeFactorsList.diff a.succ.succ.primeFactorsList).prod
nth_rw 1 [← Nat.prod_primeFactorsList ha]
rw [← List.prod_append,
List.Perm.prod_eq <| List.subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le <| List.subperm_ext_iff.mp h,
Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hb.ne']
theorem replicate_subperm_primeFactorsList_iff {a b n : ℕ} (ha : Prime a) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
replicate n a <+~ primeFactorsList b ↔ a ^ n ∣ b := by
induction n generalizing b with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
constructor
· rw [List.subperm_iff]
rintro ⟨u, hu1, hu2⟩
rw [← Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hb, ← hu1.prod_eq, ← prod_replicate]
exact hu2.prod_dvd_prod
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [Ne, pow_succ', mul_assoc, mul_eq_zero, _root_.not_or] at hb
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc, replicate_succ,
(Nat.perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb.1 hb.2).subperm_left, primeFactorsList_prime ha,
singleton_append, subperm_cons, ih hb.2]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
end
theorem mem_primeFactorsList_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) {p : ℕ} :
p ∈ (a * b).primeFactorsList ↔ p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∨ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by
rw [mem_primeFactorsList (mul_ne_zero ha hb), mem_primeFactorsList ha, mem_primeFactorsList hb,
← and_or_left]
simpa only [and_congr_right_iff] using Prime.dvd_mul
/-- The sets of factors of coprime `a` and `b` are disjoint -/
theorem coprime_primeFactorsList_disjoint {a b : ℕ} (hab : a.Coprime b) :
List.Disjoint a.primeFactorsList b.primeFactorsList := by
intro q hqa hqb
apply not_prime_one
rw [← eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes hab (dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hqa)
(dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hqb)]
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hqa
theorem mem_primeFactorsList_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) (p : ℕ) :
p ∈ (a * b).primeFactorsList ↔ p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∪ b.primeFactorsList := by
rcases a.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | ha)
· simp [(coprime_zero_left _).mp hab]
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· simp [(coprime_zero_right _).mp hab]
rw [mem_primeFactorsList_mul ha.ne' hb.ne', List.mem_union_iff]
open List
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then `p` is also a prime factor of `a * b` for any `b > 0` -/
theorem mem_primeFactorsList_mul_left {p a b : ℕ} (hpa : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
p ∈ (a * b).primeFactorsList := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp at hpa
apply (mem_primeFactorsList_mul ha hb).2 (Or.inl hpa)
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then `p` is also a prime factor of `a * b` for any `a > 0` -/
theorem mem_primeFactorsList_mul_right {p a b : ℕ} (hpb : p ∈ b.primeFactorsList) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
p ∈ (a * b).primeFactorsList := by
| rw [mul_comm]
exact mem_primeFactorsList_mul_left hpb ha
theorem eq_two_pow_or_exists_odd_prime_and_dvd (n : ℕ) :
(∃ k : ℕ, n = 2 ^ k) ∨ ∃ p, Nat.Prime p ∧ p ∣ n ∧ Odd p :=
(eq_or_ne n 0).elim (fun hn => Or.inr ⟨3, prime_three, hn.symm ▸ dvd_zero 3, ⟨1, rfl⟩⟩) fun hn =>
or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun H =>
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factors.lean | 293 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
theorem degrees_add_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem degrees_sum_le {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
theorem degrees_mul_le {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
theorem degrees_prod_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
theorem degrees_pow_le {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod_le (s := .range n) (f := fun _ ↦ p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_add := degrees_add_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sum := degrees_sum_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_mul := degrees_mul_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_prod := degrees_prod_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_pow := degrees_pow_le
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
theorem le_degrees_add_left (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias le_degrees_add := le_degrees_add_left
lemma le_degrees_add_right (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : q.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
simpa [add_comm] using le_degrees_add_left h.symm
theorem degrees_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) :
(p + q).degrees = p.degrees ∪ q.degrees :=
degrees_add_le.antisymm <| Multiset.union_le (le_degrees_add_left h) (le_degrees_add_right h)
lemma degrees_map_le [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S} : (map f p).degrees ≤ p.degrees := by
classical exact Finset.sup_mono <| support_map_subset ..
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_map := degrees_map_le
theorem degrees_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(rename f φ).degrees ⊆ φ.degrees.map f := by
classical
intro i
rw [mem_degrees, Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩ := coeff_rename_ne_zero _ _ _ hd
simp only [Finsupp.mapDomain, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at hi
rw [sum_apply, Finsupp.sum] at hi
contrapose! hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro j hj
simp only [exists_prop, mem_degrees] at hi
specialize hi j ⟨x, hx, hj⟩
rw [Finsupp.single_apply, if_neg hi]
theorem degrees_map_of_injective [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Injective f) : (map f p).degrees = p.degrees := by
simp only [degrees, MvPolynomial.support_map_of_injective _ hf]
theorem degrees_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f) :
degrees (rename f p) = (degrees p).map f := by
classical
simp only [degrees, Multiset.map_finset_sup p.support Finsupp.toMultiset f h,
support_rename_of_injective h, Finset.sup_image]
refine Finset.sup_congr rfl fun x _ => ?_
exact (Finsupp.toMultiset_map _ _).symm
end Degrees
section DegreeOf
/-! ### `degreeOf` -/
/-- `degreeOf n p` gives the highest power of X_n that appears in `p` -/
def degreeOf (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.count n
theorem degreeOf_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degreeOf n = p.degrees.count n := by rw [degreeOf]; convert rfl
theorem degreeOf_eq_sup (n : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n f = f.support.sup fun m => m n := by
classical
rw [degreeOf_def, degrees, Multiset.count_finset_sup]
congr
ext
simp only [count_toMultiset]
theorem degreeOf_lt_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} (h : 0 < d) :
degreeOf n f < d ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ f.support → m n < d := by
rwa [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
lemma degreeOf_le_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} :
degreeOf n f ≤ d ↔ ∀ m ∈ support f, m n ≤ d := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_zero (n : σ) : degreeOf n (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp only [degreeOf_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.count_zero]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_C (a : R) (x : σ) : degreeOf x (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp [degreeOf_def, degrees_C]
theorem degreeOf_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) [Nontrivial R] :
degreeOf i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
classical
by_cases c : i = j
· simp only [c, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, degreeOf_def, degrees_X, Multiset.count_singleton]
simp [c, if_false, degreeOf_def, degrees_X]
theorem degreeOf_add_le (n : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n (f + g) ≤ max (degreeOf n f) (degreeOf n g) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem monomial_le_degreeOf (i : σ) {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} (h_m : m ∈ f.support) :
| m i ≤ degreeOf i f := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup i]
apply Finset.le_sup h_m
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 254 | 256 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an order and an ordinal number.
## Main Definitions
* `Order.cof r` is the cofinality of a reflexive order. This is the smallest cardinality of a subset
`s` that is *cofinal*, i.e. `∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, r x y`.
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o` when viewed as a linear order.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
attribute [local instance] IsRefl.swap
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
private theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
theorem le_cof [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
end Order
namespace RelIso
private theorem cof_le_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) := by
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf, le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine ⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩, lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
theorem cof_eq_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isRefl
(f.cof_le_lift).antisymm (f.symm.cof_le_lift)
theorem cof_eq {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Order.cof r = Order.cof s :=
lift_inj.1 (f.cof_eq_lift)
end RelIso
/-! ### Cofinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
/-- Cofinality of an ordinal. This is the smallest cardinal of a subset `S` of the ordinal which is
unbounded, in the sense `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≤ b`.
In particular, `cof 0 = 0` and `cof (succ o) = 1`. -/
def cof (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
o.liftOn (fun a ↦ Order.cof (swap a.rᶜ)) fun _ _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ f.compl.swap.cof_eq
theorem cof_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (type r).cof = Order.cof (swap rᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem cof_type_lt [LinearOrder α] [IsWellOrder α (· < ·)] :
(@type α (· < ·) _).cof = @Order.cof α (· ≤ ·) := by
rw [cof_type, compl_lt, swap_ge]
theorem cof_eq_cof_toType (o : Ordinal) : o.cof = @Order.cof o.toType (· ≤ ·) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← type_toType o, cof_type_lt]
theorem le_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {c} : c ≤ cof (type r) ↔ ∀ S, Unbounded r S → c ≤ #S :=
(le_csInf_iff'' (Order.cof_nonempty _)).trans
⟨fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H _ h⟩
theorem cof_type_le [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} (h : Unbounded r S) : cof (type r) ≤ #S :=
le_cof_type.1 le_rfl S h
theorem lt_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} : #S < cof (type r) → Bounded r S := by
simpa using not_imp_not.2 cof_type_le
theorem cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : ∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
csInf_mem (Order.cof_nonempty (swap rᶜ))
theorem ord_cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ type (Subrel r (· ∈ S)) = (cof (type r)).ord := by
let ⟨S, hS, e⟩ := cof_eq r
let ⟨s, _, e'⟩ := Cardinal.ord_eq S
let T : Set α := { a | ∃ aS : a ∈ S, ∀ b : S, s b ⟨_, aS⟩ → r b a }
suffices Unbounded r T by
refine ⟨T, this, le_antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.ord_le.2 <| cof_type_le this)⟩
rw [← e, e']
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone
(fun a : T =>
(⟨a,
let ⟨aS, _⟩ := a.2
aS⟩ :
S))
fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
rcases a with ⟨a, aS, ha⟩
rcases b with ⟨b, bS, hb⟩
change s ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
refine ((trichotomous_of s _ _).resolve_left fun hn => ?_).resolve_left ?_
· exact asymm h (ha _ hn)
· intro e
injection e with e
subst b
exact irrefl _ h
intro a
have : { b : S | ¬r b a }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨b, bS, ba⟩ := hS a
⟨⟨b, bS⟩, ba⟩
let b := (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded s).min _ this
have ba : ¬r b a := IsWellFounded.wf.min_mem _ this
refine ⟨b, ⟨b.2, fun c => not_imp_not.1 fun h => ?_⟩, ba⟩
rw [show ∀ b : S, (⟨b, b.2⟩ : S) = b by intro b; cases b; rfl]
exact IsWellFounded.wf.not_lt_min _ this (IsOrderConnected.neg_trans h ba)
/-! ### Cofinality of suprema and least strict upper bounds -/
private theorem card_mem_cof {o} : ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = o.card :=
⟨_, _, lsub_typein o, mk_toType o⟩
/-- The set in the `lsub` characterization of `cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_lsub_def_nonempty (o) :
{ a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, card_mem_cof⟩
theorem cof_eq_sInf_lsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) : cof o =
sInf { a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : Type u) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a } := by
refine le_antisymm (le_csInf (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o) ?_) (csInf_le' ?_)
· rintro a ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩
rw [← type_toType o]
refine
(cof_type_le fun a => ?_).trans
(@mk_le_of_injective _ _
(fun s : typein ((· < ·) : o.toType → o.toType → Prop) ⁻¹' Set.range f =>
Classical.choose s.prop)
fun s t hst => by
let H := congr_arg f hst
rwa [Classical.choose_spec s.prop, Classical.choose_spec t.prop, typein_inj,
Subtype.coe_inj] at H)
have := typein_lt_self a
simp_rw [← hf, lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
refine ⟨enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨f i, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [type_toType, ← hf]
apply lt_lsub
· rw [mem_preimage, typein_enum]
exact mem_range_self i
· rwa [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum]
· rcases cof_eq (α := o.toType) (· < ·) with ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩
let f : S → Ordinal := fun s => typein LT.lt s.val
refine ⟨S, f, le_antisymm (lsub_le fun i => typein_lt_self (o := o) i)
(le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_), by rwa [type_toType o] at hS'⟩
rw [← type_toType o] at ha
rcases hS (enum (· < ·) ⟨a, ha⟩) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
rw [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum] at hb'
exact hb'.trans_lt (lt_lsub.{u, u} f ⟨b, hb⟩)
@[simp]
theorem lift_cof (o) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (cof o) = cof (Ordinal.lift.{u, v} o) := by
refine inductionOn o fun α r _ ↦ ?_
rw [← type_uLift, cof_type, cof_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v, u} (Order.cof _),
← Cardinal.lift_umax]
apply RelIso.cof_eq_lift ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm, _⟩
simp [swap]
theorem cof_le_card (o) : cof o ≤ card o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' card_mem_cof
theorem cof_ord_le (c : Cardinal) : c.ord.cof ≤ c := by simpa using cof_le_card c.ord
theorem ord_cof_le (o : Ordinal.{u}) : o.cof.ord ≤ o :=
(ord_le_ord.2 (cof_le_card o)).trans (ord_card_le o)
theorem exists_lsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = cof o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_mem (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)
theorem cof_lsub_le {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : cof (lsub.{u, u} f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' ⟨ι, f, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem cof_lsub_le_lift {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) :
cof (lsub.{u, v} f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← mk_uLift.{u, v}]
convert cof_lsub_le.{max u v} fun i : ULift.{v, u} ι => f i.down
exact
lsub_eq_of_range_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}
(Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨ULift.up.{v, u} i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩)
theorem le_cof_iff_lsub {o : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof o ↔ ∀ {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o → a ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact
(le_csInf_iff'' (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)).trans
⟨fun H ι f hf => H _ ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨ι, f, hf, hb⟩ => by
rw [← hb]
exact H _ hf⟩
theorem lsub_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : lsub.{u, v} f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (lsub_le hf) fun h => by
subst h
exact (cof_lsub_le_lift.{u, v} f).not_lt hι
theorem lsub_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → lsub.{u, u} f < c :=
lsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem cof_iSup_le_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← Ordinal.sup] at *
rw [← sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift f
theorem cof_iSup_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [← (#ι).lift_id]
exact cof_iSup_le_lift H
theorem iSup_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c :=
(sup_le_lsub.{u, v} f).trans_lt (lsub_lt_ord_lift hι hf)
theorem iSup_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem iSup_lt_lift {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.ord.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c := by
rw [← ord_lt_ord, iSup_ord (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)]
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift hι fun i => ?_
rw [ord_lt_ord]
apply hf
theorem iSup_lt {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal} (hι : #ι < c.ord.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c)
(hc' : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < cof c) (hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} (ha : a < c) :
nfpFamily f a < c := by
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift ((Cardinal.lift_le.2 (mk_list_le_max ι)).trans_lt ?_) fun l => ?_
· rw [lift_max]
apply max_lt _ hc'
rwa [Cardinal.lift_aleph0]
· induction' l with i l H
· exact ha
· exact hf _ _ H
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hc' : #ι < cof c)
(hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} : a < c → nfpFamily.{u, u} f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id]) hf
theorem nfp_lt_ord {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hf : ∀ i < c, f i < c) {a} :
a < c → nfp f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by simpa using Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0.trans hc) fun _ => hf
theorem exists_blsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ f : ∀ a < (cof o).ord, Ordinal, blsub.{u, u} _ f = o := by
rcases exists_lsub_cof o with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
rw [← hι, hι']
exact ⟨_, hf⟩
theorem le_cof_iff_blsub {b : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof b ↔ ∀ {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), blsub.{u, u} o f = b → a ≤ o.card :=
le_cof_iff_lsub.trans
⟨fun H o f hf => by simpa using H _ hf, fun H ι f hf => by
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
simpa using H _ hf⟩
theorem cof_blsub_le_lift {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) :
cof (blsub.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← mk_toType o]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift _
theorem cof_blsub_le {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) : cof (blsub.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift f
theorem blsub_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, v} o f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (blsub_le hf) fun h =>
ho.not_le (by simpa [← iSup_ord, hf, h] using cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f)
theorem blsub_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, u} o f < c :=
blsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id]) hf
theorem cof_bsup_le_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} (H : ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, v} o f) :
cof (bsup.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f
theorem cof_bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} :
(∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, u} o f) → cof (bsup.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_bsup_le_lift
theorem bsup_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : bsup.{u, v} o f < c :=
(bsup_le_blsub f).trans_lt (blsub_lt_ord_lift ho hf)
theorem bsup_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof) :
(∀ i hi, f i hi < c) → bsup.{u, u} o f < c :=
bsup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id])
/-! ### Basic results -/
@[simp]
theorem cof_zero : cof 0 = 0 := by
refine LE.le.antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.zero_le _)
rw [← card_zero]
exact cof_le_card 0
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_zero {o} : cof o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨inductionOn o fun _ r _ z =>
let ⟨_, hl, e⟩ := cof_eq r
type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty.2 <|
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨_, h, _⟩ := hl a
(mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (e.trans z)).elim' ⟨_, h⟩⟩,
fun e => by simp [e]⟩
theorem cof_ne_zero {o} : cof o ≠ 0 ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
cof_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem cof_succ (o) : cof (succ o) = 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine inductionOn o fun α r _ => ?_
change cof (type _) ≤ _
rw [← (_ : #_ = 1)]
· apply cof_type_le
refine fun a => ⟨Sum.inr PUnit.unit, Set.mem_singleton _, ?_⟩
rcases a with (a | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> simp [EmptyRelation]
· rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Set.card_singleton]
simp
· rw [← Cardinal.succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Cardinal.zero_le] using fun h =>
succ_ne_zero o (cof_eq_zero.1 (Eq.symm h))
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ {o} : cof.{u} o = 1 ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨inductionOn o fun α r _ z => by
rcases cof_eq r with ⟨S, hl, e⟩; rw [z] at e
obtain ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 (by rw [e]; exact one_ne_zero)
refine
⟨typein r a,
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ fun x y => ?_) fun x => ?_⟩⟩
· apply Sum.rec <;> [exact Subtype.val; exact fun _ => a]
· rcases x with (x | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> rcases y with (y | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;>
simp [Subrel, Order.Preimage, EmptyRelation]
exact x.2
· suffices r x a ∨ ∃ _ : PUnit.{u}, ↑a = x by
convert this
dsimp [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone]; simp
rcases trichotomous_of r x a with (h | h | h)
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨PUnit.unit, h.symm⟩
· rcases hl x with ⟨a', aS, hn⟩
refine absurd h ?_
convert hn
change (a : α) = ↑(⟨a', aS⟩ : S)
have := le_one_iff_subsingleton.1 (le_of_eq e)
congr!,
fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp [e]⟩
/-! ### Fundamental sequences -/
-- TODO: move stuff about fundamental sequences to their own file.
/-- A fundamental sequence for `a` is an increasing sequence of length `o = cof a` that converges at
`a`. We provide `o` explicitly in order to avoid type rewrites. -/
def IsFundamentalSequence (a o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}) : Prop :=
o ≤ a.cof.ord ∧ (∀ {i j} (hi hj), i < j → f i hi < f j hj) ∧ blsub.{u, u} o f = a
namespace IsFundamentalSequence
variable {a o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}}
protected theorem cof_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : a.cof.ord = o :=
hf.1.antisymm' <| by
rw [← hf.2.2]
exact (ord_le_ord.2 (cof_blsub_le f)).trans (ord_card_le o)
protected theorem strict_mono (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j} :
∀ hi hj, i < j → f i hi < f j hj :=
hf.2.1
theorem blsub_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : blsub.{u, u} o f = a :=
hf.2.2
theorem ord_cof (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) :
IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord fun i hi => f i (hi.trans_le (by rw [hf.cof_eq])) := by
have H := hf.cof_eq
subst H
exact hf
theorem id_of_le_cof (h : o ≤ o.cof.ord) : IsFundamentalSequence o o fun a _ => a :=
⟨h, @fun _ _ _ _ => id, blsub_id o⟩
protected theorem zero {f : ∀ b < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal} : IsFundamentalSequence 0 0 f :=
⟨by rw [cof_zero, ord_zero], @fun i _ hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim, blsub_zero f⟩
protected theorem succ : IsFundamentalSequence (succ o) 1 fun _ _ => o := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j hi hj h => ?_, blsub_const Ordinal.one_ne_zero o⟩
· rw [cof_succ, ord_one]
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at hi hj
rw [hi, hj] at h
exact h.false.elim
protected theorem monotone (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j : Ordinal} (hi : i < o)
(hj : j < o) (hij : i ≤ j) : f i hi ≤ f j hj := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hij with (hij | rfl)
· exact (hf.2.1 hi hj hij).le
· rfl
theorem trans {a o o' : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f)
{g : ∀ b < o', Ordinal.{u}} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence o o' g) :
IsFundamentalSequence a o' fun i hi =>
f (g i hi) (by rw [← hg.2.2]; apply lt_blsub) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.2.1 _ _ (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rw [hf.cof_eq]
exact hg.1.trans (ord_cof_le o)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} o _ f (@IsFundamentalSequence.monotone _ _ f hf)]
· exact hf.2.2
· exact hg.2.2
protected theorem lt {a o : Ordinal} {s : Π p < o, Ordinal}
(h : IsFundamentalSequence a o s) {p : Ordinal} (hp : p < o) : s p hp < a :=
h.blsub_eq ▸ lt_blsub s p hp
end IsFundamentalSequence
/-- Every ordinal has a fundamental sequence. -/
theorem exists_fundamental_sequence (a : Ordinal.{u}) :
∃ f, IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord f := by
suffices h : ∃ o f, IsFundamentalSequence a o f by
rcases h with ⟨o, f, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.ord_cof⟩
rcases exists_lsub_cof a with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases ord_eq ι with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
let r' := Subrel r fun i ↦ ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
let hrr' : r' ↪r r := Subrel.relEmbedding _ _
haveI := hrr'.isWellOrder
refine
⟨_, _, hrr'.ordinal_type_le.trans ?_, @fun i j _ h _ => (enum r' ⟨j, h⟩).prop _ ?_,
le_antisymm (blsub_le fun i hi => lsub_le_iff.1 hf.le _) ?_⟩
· rw [← hι, hr]
· change r (hrr'.1 _) (hrr'.1 _)
rwa [hrr'.2, @enum_lt_enum _ r']
· rw [← hf, lsub_le_iff]
intro i
suffices h : ∃ i' hi', f i ≤ bfamilyOfFamily' r' (fun i => f i) i' hi' by
rcases h with ⟨i', hi', hfg⟩
exact hfg.trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ _)
by_cases h : ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
· refine ⟨typein r' ⟨i, h⟩, typein_lt_type _ _, ?_⟩
rw [bfamilyOfFamily'_typein]
· push_neg at h
obtain ⟨hji, hij⟩ := wo.wf.min_mem _ h
refine ⟨typein r' ⟨_, fun k hkj => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hij⟩, typein_lt_type _ _, ?_⟩
· by_contra! H
exact (wo.wf.not_lt_min _ h ⟨IsTrans.trans _ _ _ hkj hji, H⟩) hkj
· rwa [bfamilyOfFamily'_typein]
@[simp]
theorem cof_cof (a : Ordinal.{u}) : cof (cof a).ord = cof a := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a.cof.ord
exact ord_injective (hf.trans hg).cof_eq.symm
protected theorem IsNormal.isFundamentalSequence {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsNormal f)
{a o} (ha : IsLimit a) {g} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence a o g) :
IsFundamentalSequence (f a) o fun b hb => f (g b hb) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.strictMono (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rcases exists_lsub_cof (f a) with ⟨ι, f', hf', hι⟩
rw [← hg.cof_eq, ord_le_ord, ← hι]
suffices (lsub.{u, u} fun i => sInf { b : Ordinal | f' i ≤ f b }) = a by
rw [← this]
apply cof_lsub_le
have H : ∀ i, ∃ b < a, f' i ≤ f b := fun i => by
have := lt_lsub.{u, u} f' i
rw [hf', ← IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} hf ha, lt_blsub_iff] at this
simpa using this
refine (lsub_le fun i => ?_).antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun b hb => ?_)
· rcases H i with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (csInf_le' hb') hb
· have := hf.strictMono hb
rw [← hf', lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
rcases H i with ⟨b, _, hb⟩
exact
((le_csInf_iff'' ⟨b, by exact hb⟩).2 fun c hc =>
hf.strictMono.le_iff_le.1 (hi.trans hc)).trans_lt (lt_lsub _ i)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} a _ (fun b _ => f b) (@fun i j _ _ h => hf.strictMono.monotone h) g
hg.2.2]
exact IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} hf ha
theorem IsNormal.cof_eq {f} (hf : IsNormal f) {a} (ha : IsLimit a) : cof (f a) = cof a :=
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a
ord_injective (hf.isFundamentalSequence ha hg).cof_eq
theorem IsNormal.cof_le {f} (hf : IsNormal f) (a) : cof a ≤ cof (f a) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit a with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | ha)
· rw [cof_zero]
exact zero_le _
· rw [cof_succ, Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero, cof_ne_zero, ← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact (Ordinal.zero_le (f b)).trans_lt (hf.1 b)
· rw [hf.cof_eq ha]
@[simp]
theorem cof_add (a b : Ordinal) : b ≠ 0 → cof (a + b) = cof b := fun h => by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨c, rfl⟩ | hb)
· contradiction
· rw [add_succ, cof_succ, cof_succ]
· exact (isNormal_add_right a).cof_eq hb
theorem aleph0_le_cof {o} : ℵ₀ ≤ cof o ↔ IsLimit o := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit o with (rfl | ⟨o, rfl⟩ | l)
· simp [not_zero_isLimit, Cardinal.aleph0_ne_zero]
· simp [not_succ_isLimit, Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0]
· simp only [l, iff_true]
refine le_of_not_lt fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨n, e⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.1 h
have := cof_cof o
rw [e, ord_nat] at this
cases n
· simp at e
simp [e, not_zero_isLimit] at l
· rw [natCast_succ, cof_succ] at this
rw [← this, cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ] at e
rcases e with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact not_succ_isLimit _ l
@[simp]
theorem cof_preOmega {o : Ordinal} (ho : IsSuccPrelimit o) : (preOmega o).cof = o.cof := by
by_cases h : IsMin o
· simp [h.eq_bot]
· exact isNormal_preOmega.cof_eq ⟨h, ho⟩
@[simp]
theorem cof_omega {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) : (ω_ o).cof = o.cof :=
isNormal_omega.cof_eq ho
@[simp]
theorem cof_omega0 : cof ω = ℵ₀ :=
(aleph0_le_cof.2 isLimit_omega0).antisymm' <| by
rw [← card_omega0]
apply cof_le_card
theorem cof_eq' (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (h : IsLimit (type r)) :
∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
let ⟨S, H, e⟩ := cof_eq r
⟨S, fun a =>
let a' := enum r ⟨_, h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r a)⟩
let ⟨b, h, ab⟩ := H a'
⟨b, h,
(IsOrderConnected.conn a b a' <|
(typein_lt_typein r).1
(by
rw [typein_enum]
exact lt_succ (typein _ _))).resolve_right
ab⟩,
e⟩
@[simp]
theorem cof_univ : cof univ.{u, v} = Cardinal.univ.{u, v} :=
le_antisymm (cof_le_card _)
(by
refine le_of_forall_lt fun c h => ?_
rcases lt_univ'.1 h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases @cof_eq Ordinal.{u} (· < ·) _ with ⟨S, H, Se⟩
rw [univ, ← lift_cof, ← Cardinal.lift_lift.{u+1, v, u}, Cardinal.lift_lt, ← Se]
refine lt_of_not_ge fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le h
refine Quotient.inductionOn a (fun α e => ?_) e
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact e
have f := Equiv.ulift.symm.trans f
let g a := (f a).1
let o := succ (iSup g)
rcases H o with ⟨b, h, l⟩
refine l (lt_succ_iff.2 ?_)
rw [← show g (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩) = b by simp [g]]
apply Ordinal.le_iSup)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
/-! ### Results on sets -/
theorem mk_bounded_subset {α : Type*} (h : ∀ x < #α, 2 ^ x < #α) {r : α → α → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (#α).ord = type r) : #{ s : Set α // Bounded r s } = #α := by
rcases eq_or_ne #α 0 with (ha | ha)
· rw [ha]
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 ha
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
exact (not_unbounded_iff s).2 hs (unbounded_of_isEmpty s)
have h' : IsStrongLimit #α := ⟨ha, @h⟩
have ha := h'.aleph0_le
apply le_antisymm
· have : { s : Set α | Bounded r s } = ⋃ i, 𝒫{ j | r j i } := setOf_exists _
rw [← coe_setOf, this]
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans ((sum_le_iSup (fun i => #(𝒫{ j | r j i }))).trans
((mul_le_max_of_aleph0_le_left ha).trans ?_))
rw [max_eq_left]
apply ciSup_le' _
intro i
rw [mk_powerset]
apply (h'.two_power_lt _).le
rw [coe_setOf, card_typein, ← lt_ord, hr]
apply typein_lt_type
· refine @mk_le_of_injective α _ (fun x => Subtype.mk {x} ?_) ?_
· apply bounded_singleton
rw [← hr]
apply isLimit_ord ha
· intro a b hab
simpa [singleton_eq_singleton_iff] using hab
theorem mk_subset_mk_lt_cof {α : Type*} (h : ∀ x < #α, 2 ^ x < #α) :
#{ s : Set α // #s < cof (#α).ord } = #α := by
rcases eq_or_ne #α 0 with (ha | ha)
· simp [ha]
have h' : IsStrongLimit #α := ⟨ha, @h⟩
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
apply le_antisymm
· conv_rhs => rw [← mk_bounded_subset h hr]
apply mk_le_mk_of_subset
intro s hs
rw [hr] at hs
exact lt_cof_type hs
· refine @mk_le_of_injective α _ (fun x => Subtype.mk {x} ?_) ?_
· rw [mk_singleton]
exact one_lt_aleph0.trans_le (aleph0_le_cof.2 (isLimit_ord h'.aleph0_le))
· intro a b hab
simpa [singleton_eq_singleton_iff] using hab
/-- If the union of s is unbounded and s is smaller than the cofinality,
then s has an unbounded member -/
theorem unbounded_of_unbounded_sUnion (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] {s : Set (Set α)}
(h₁ : Unbounded r <| ⋃₀ s) (h₂ : #s < Order.cof (swap rᶜ)) : ∃ x ∈ s, Unbounded r x := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [not_unbounded_iff] at h
let f : s → α := fun x : s => wo.wf.sup x (h x.1 x.2)
refine h₂.not_le (le_trans (csInf_le' ⟨range f, fun x => ?_, rfl⟩) mk_range_le)
rcases h₁ x with ⟨y, ⟨c, hc, hy⟩, hxy⟩
exact ⟨f ⟨c, hc⟩, mem_range_self _, fun hxz => hxy (Trans.trans (wo.wf.lt_sup _ hy) hxz)⟩
/-- If the union of s is unbounded and s is smaller than the cofinality,
then s has an unbounded member -/
theorem unbounded_of_unbounded_iUnion {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(s : β → Set α) (h₁ : Unbounded r <| ⋃ x, s x) (h₂ : #β < Order.cof (swap rᶜ)) :
∃ x : β, Unbounded r (s x) := by
rw [← sUnion_range] at h₁
rcases unbounded_of_unbounded_sUnion r h₁ (mk_range_le.trans_lt h₂) with ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, u⟩
exact ⟨x, u⟩
/-! ### Consequences of König's lemma -/
theorem lt_power_cof {c : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ c → c < c ^ c.ord.cof :=
Cardinal.inductionOn c fun α h => by
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, re⟩
have := isLimit_ord h
rw [re] at this ⊢
rcases cof_eq' r this with ⟨S, H, Se⟩
have := sum_lt_prod (fun a : S => #{ x // r x a }) (fun _ => #α) fun i => ?_
· simp only [Cardinal.prod_const, Cardinal.lift_id, ← Se, ← mk_sigma, power_def] at this ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ this
refine ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective ?_ ?_⟩
· exact fun x => x.2.1
· exact fun a =>
let ⟨b, h, ab⟩ := H a
⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩, _, ab⟩, rfl⟩
· have := typein_lt_type r i
rwa [← re, lt_ord] at this
theorem lt_cof_power {a b : Cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (b1 : 1 < b) : a < (b ^ a).ord.cof := by
have b0 : b ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans b1).ne'
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (power_le_power_left <| power_ne_zero a b0)
rw [← power_mul, mul_eq_self ha]
exact lt_power_cof (ha.trans <| (cantor' _ b1).le)
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 1,227 | 1,230 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
/-!
# Characterizations of weak convergence of finite measures and probability measures
This file will provide portmanteau characterizations of the weak convergence of finite measures
and of probability measures, i.e., the standard characterizations of convergence in distribution.
## Main definitions
The topologies of weak convergence on the types of finite measures and probability measures are
already defined in their corresponding files; no substantial new definitions are introduced here.
## Main results
The main result will be the portmanteau theorem providing various characterizations of the
weak convergence of measures (probability measures or finite measures). Given measures μs
and μ on a topological space Ω, the conditions that will be proven equivalent (under quite
general hypotheses) are:
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly.
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
The separate implications are:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto` is the implication (T) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge` is the equivalence (C) ↔ (O).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier` is the implication (O) → (B).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure` is the implication (B) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_of_forall_isOpen_le_liminf` gives the implication (O) → (T) for
any sequence of Borel probability measures.
## Implementation notes
Many of the characterizations of weak convergence hold for finite measures and are proven in that
generality and then specialized to probability measures. Some implications hold with slightly
more general assumptions than in the usual statement of portmanteau theorem. The full portmanteau
theorem, however, is most convenient for probability measures on pseudo-emetrizable spaces with
their Borel sigma algebras.
Some specific considerations on the assumptions in the different implications:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto`, i.e., implication (T) → (C),
assumes that in the underlying topological space, indicator functions of closed sets have
decreasing bounded continuous pointwise approximating sequences. The assumption is in the form
of the type class `HasOuterApproxClosed`. Type class inference knows that for example the more
common assumptions of metrizability or pseudo-emetrizability suffice.
* Where formulations are currently only provided for probability measures, one can obtain the
finite measure formulations using the characterization of convergence of finite measures by
their total masses and their probability-normalized versions, i.e., by
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_normalize_iff_tendsto`.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, convergence in distribution, convergence in law, finite measure,
probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen
/-! ### Portmanteau: limsup condition for closed sets iff liminf condition for open sets
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, the following two conditions are equivalent:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
Either of these will later be shown to be equivalent to the weak convergence of the sequence
of measures.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E) :
μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [liminf_bot, le_top]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.liminf fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.liminf ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_limsup_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ) :
μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
compl_compl E ▸ le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
theorem limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
rw [show (L.limsup fun i : ι ↦ 1 - μs i E) = L.limsup ((fun x ↦ 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι ↦ μs i E)
from rfl]
have key := antitone_const_tsub.map_liminf_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i ↦ μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simpa [← key] using antitone_const_tsub h
theorem limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i Eᶜ) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ μ E :=
compl_compl E ▸ limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One pair of implications of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, the following two are equivalent:
(C) The limsup of the measures of any closed set is at most the measure of the closed set
under a candidate limit measure.
(O) The liminf of the measures of any open set is at least the measure of the open set
under a candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] :
(∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F) ↔
∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G := by
constructor
· intro h G G_open
exact le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le
G_open.measurableSet (h Gᶜ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
· intro h F F_closed
exact limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl
F_closed.measurableSet (h Fᶜ (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr F_closed))
end LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen -- section
section TendstoOfNullFrontier
/-! ### Portmanteau: limit of measures of Borel sets whose boundary carries no mass in the limit
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, either of the following equivalent conditions:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
implies that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} {E₀ E E₁ : Set Ω} (E₀_subset : E₀ ⊆ E) (subset_E₁ : E ⊆ E₁)
(nulldiff : μ (E₁ \ E₀) = 0) (h_E₀ : μ E₀ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀)
(h_E₁ : (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁) ≤ μ E₁) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
apply tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
· have E₀_ae_eq_E : E₀ =ᵐ[μ] E :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm E₀_subset.eventuallyLE
(subset_E₁.eventuallyLE.trans (ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff))
calc
μ E = μ E₀ := measure_congr E₀_ae_eq_E.symm
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E₀ := h_E₀
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i E :=
liminf_le_liminf (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono E₀_subset)
· have E_ae_eq_E₁ : E =ᵐ[μ] E₁ :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm subset_E₁.eventuallyLE
((ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff).trans E₀_subset.eventuallyLE)
calc
(L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E) ≤ L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i E₁ :=
limsup_le_limsup (.of_forall fun _ ↦ measure_mono subset_E₁)
_ ≤ μ E₁ := h_E₁
_ = μ E := measure_congr E_ae_eq_E₁.symm
· infer_param
· infer_param
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, if the liminf of the measures of any open set is at
least the measure of the open set under a candidate limit measure, then for any set whose
boundary carries no probability mass under the candidate limit measure, then its measures under the
sequence converge to its measure under the candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ μs i G) {E : Set Ω}
(E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : L.Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F :=
limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge.mpr h_opens
tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le interior_subset subset_closure
E_nullbdry (h_opens _ isOpen_interior) (h_closeds _ isClosed_closure)
end TendstoOfNullFrontier --section
section ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: weak convergence implies a limsup condition for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (T) implies also both
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G);
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of finite measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed set is
at most the measure of the closed set under the limit measure.
-/
theorem FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μs : ι → FiniteMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro ε ε_pos _
have ε_pos' := (ENNReal.half_pos (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr ε_pos.ne.symm)).ne.symm
let fs := F_closed.apprSeq
have key₁ : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ ω, (fs n ω : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) F)) :=
HasOuterApproxClosed.tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq F_closed (μ : Measure Ω)
have room₁ : (μ : Measure Ω) F < (μ : Measure Ω) F + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (measure_lt_top (μ : Measure Ω) F).ne ε_pos'
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp <| key₁.eventually_lt_const room₁
have key₂ := FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mp μs_lim (fs M)
have room₂ :
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) <
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a ↦ fs M a) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_of_lt ((fs M).lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _)) ε_pos'
have ev_near := key₂.eventually_le_const room₂
have ev_near' := ev_near.mono
(fun n ↦ le_trans (HasOuterApproxClosed.measure_le_lintegral F_closed (μs n) M))
apply (Filter.limsup_le_limsup ev_near').trans
rw [limsup_const]
apply le_trans (add_le_add (hM M rfl.le).le (le_refl (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞)))
simp only [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves, le_refl]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed
set is at most the measure of the closed set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
apply FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
((tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds L).mp μs_lim) F_closed
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the liminf of the measures of any open set
is at least the measure of the open set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{G : Set Ω} (G_open : IsOpen G) :
(μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F :=
fun _ F_closed ↦ limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto μs_lim F_closed
le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le G_open.measurableSet
(h_closeds _ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' {Ω ι : Type*}
{L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
[HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω}
(μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : (μ : Measure Ω) (frontier E) = 0) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) E) L (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) E)) :=
haveI h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → (μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
fun _ G_open ↦ le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto μs_lim G_open
tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier h_opens E_nullbdry
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that if the boundary of a Borel set
carries no probability mass under the limit measure, then the limit of the measures of the set
equals the measure of the set under the limit probability measure.
A version with coercions to ordinary `ℝ≥0∞`-valued measures is
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto'`.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have key := tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' μs_lim (by simpa using E_nullbdry)
exact (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal (measure_ne_top (↑μ) E)).comp key
end ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE --section
section LimitBorelImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: limit condition for Borel sets implies limsup for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B)
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (B) implies also
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
-/
open ENNReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem exists_null_frontier_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) {a b : ℝ}
(hab : a < b) : ∃ r ∈ Ioo a b, μ (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) = 0 := by
have mbles : ∀ r : ℝ, MeasurableSet (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) :=
fun r ↦ isClosed_frontier.measurableSet
have disjs := Metric.frontier_thickening_disjoint s
have key := Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion (μ := μ) mbles disjs
have aux := measure_diff_null (s := Ioo a b) (Set.Countable.measure_zero key volume)
have len_pos : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) := by simp only [hab, ENNReal.ofReal_pos, sub_pos]
rw [← Real.volume_Ioo, ← aux] at len_pos
rcases nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero len_pos.ne.symm with ⟨r, ⟨r_in_Ioo, hr⟩⟩
refine ⟨r, r_in_Ioo, ?_⟩
simpa only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt, le_zero_iff] using hr
theorem exists_null_frontiers_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) :
∃ rs : ℕ → ℝ,
Tendsto rs atTop (𝓝 0) ∧ ∀ n, 0 < rs n ∧ μ (frontier (Metric.thickening (rs n) s)) = 0 := by
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ) with ⟨Rs, ⟨_, ⟨Rs_pos, Rs_lim⟩⟩⟩
have obs := fun n : ℕ => exists_null_frontier_thickening μ s (Rs_pos n)
refine ⟨fun n : ℕ => (obs n).choose, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds Rs_lim
(fun n ↦ (obs n).choose_spec.1.1.le) fun n ↦ (obs n).choose_spec.1.2.le
· exact fun n ↦ ⟨(obs n).choose_spec.1.1, (obs n).choose_spec.2⟩
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Assuming that for all Borel sets E whose boundary ∂E carries no probability mass under a
| candidate limit probability measure μ we have convergence of the measures μsᵢ(E) to μ(E),
then for all closed sets F we have the limsup condition limsup μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F). -/
lemma limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure
{Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
{μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {μs : ι → Measure Ω}
(h : ∀ {E : Set Ω}, MeasurableSet E → μ (frontier E) = 0 →
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)))
(F : Set Ω) (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
L.limsup (fun i ↦ μs i F) ≤ μ F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_eq_zero', zero_le]
have ex := exists_null_frontiers_thickening μ F
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Portmanteau.lean | 399 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Categories of indexed families of objects.
We define the pointwise category structure on indexed families of objects in a category
(and also the dependent generalization).
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w₀ w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variable {I : Type w₀} {J : Type w₁} (C : I → Type u₁) [∀ i, Category.{v₁} (C i)]
/-- `pi C` gives the cartesian product of an indexed family of categories.
-/
instance pi : Category.{max w₀ v₁} (∀ i, C i) where
Hom X Y := ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i
id X i := 𝟙 (X i)
comp f g i := f i ≫ g i
namespace Pi
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (X : ∀ i, C i) (i) : (𝟙 X : ∀ i, X i ⟶ X i) i = 𝟙 (X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (i) :
(f ≫ g : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Z i) i = f i ≫ g i :=
rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : ∀ i, C i} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
funext (w ·)
/--
The evaluation functor at `i : I`, sending an `I`-indexed family of objects to the object over `i`.
-/
@[simps]
def eval (i : I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ C i where
obj f := f i
map α := α i
section
variable {J : Type w₁}
/- Porting note: add this because Lean cannot see directly through the `∘` for
`Function.comp` -/
instance (f : J → I) : (j : J) → Category ((C ∘ f) j) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
/-- Pull back an `I`-indexed family of objects to a `J`-indexed family, along a function `J → I`.
-/
@[simps]
def comap (h : J → I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, C (h j)) where
obj f i := f (h i)
map α i := α (h i)
variable (I)
/-- The natural isomorphism between
pulling back a grading along the identity function,
and the identity functor. -/
@[simps]
def comapId : comap C (id : I → I) ≅ 𝟭 (∀ i, C i) where
hom := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
inv := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
example (g : J → I) : (j : J) → Category (C (g j)) := by infer_instance
variable {I}
variable {K : Type w₂}
/-- The natural isomorphism comparing between
pulling back along two successive functions, and
pulling back along their composition
-/
@[simps!]
def comapComp (f : K → J) (g : J → I) : comap C g ⋙ comap (C ∘ g) f ≅ comap C (g ∘ f) where
hom :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
inv :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
/-- The natural isomorphism between pulling back then evaluating, and just evaluating. -/
@[simps!]
def comapEvalIsoEval (h : J → I) (j : J) : comap C h ⋙ eval (C ∘ h) j ≅ eval C (h j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ => Iso.refl _) (by simp only [Iso.refl]; simp)
end
section
variable {J : Type w₀} {D : J → Type u₁} [∀ j, Category.{v₁} (D j)]
/- Porting note: maybe mixing up universes -/
instance sumElimCategory : ∀ s : I ⊕ J, Category.{v₁} (Sum.elim C D s)
| Sum.inl i => by
dsimp
infer_instance
| Sum.inr j => by
dsimp
infer_instance
/- Porting note: replaced `Sum.rec` with `match`'s per the error about
current state of code generation -/
/-- The bifunctor combining an `I`-indexed family of objects with a `J`-indexed family of objects
to obtain an `I ⊕ J`-indexed family of objects.
-/
@[simps]
def sum : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, D j) ⥤ ∀ s : I ⊕ J, Sum.elim C D s where
obj X :=
{ obj := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => X i
| .inr j => Y j
map := fun {_} {_} f s =>
match s with
| .inl i => 𝟙 (X i)
| .inr j => f j }
map {X} {X'} f :=
{ app := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => f i
| .inr j => 𝟙 (Y j) }
end
variable {C}
/-- An isomorphism between `I`-indexed objects gives an isomorphism between each
pair of corresponding components. -/
@[simps]
def isoApp {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : X i ≅ Y i :=
⟨f.hom i, f.inv i,
by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.hom_inv_id, id_apply], by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.inv_hom_id, id_apply]⟩
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_refl (X : ∀ i, C i) (i : I) : isoApp (Iso.refl X) i = Iso.refl (X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_symm {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : isoApp f.symm i = (isoApp f i).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_trans {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (i : I) :
isoApp (f ≪≫ g) i = isoApp f i ≪≫ isoApp g i :=
rfl
end Pi
namespace Functor
variable {C}
variable {D : I → Type u₂} [∀ i, Category.{v₂} (D i)] {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A]
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of functors into a functor between the pi types.
-/
@[simps]
def pi (F : ∀ i, C i ⥤ D i) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ ∀ i, D i where
obj f i := (F i).obj (f i)
map α i := (F i).map (α i)
/-- Similar to `pi`, but all functors come from the same category `A`
-/
@[simps]
def pi' (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i where
obj a i := (f i).obj a
map h i := (f i).map h
/-- The projections of `Functor.pi' F` are isomorphic to the functors of the family `F` -/
@[simps!]
def pi'CompEval {A : Type*} [Category A] (F : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) :
pi' F ⋙ Pi.eval C i ≅ F i :=
Iso.refl _
section EqToHom
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_proj {x x' : ∀ i, C i} (h : x = x') (i : I) :
(eqToHom h : x ⟶ x') i = eqToHom (funext_iff.mp h i) := by
subst h
rfl
end EqToHom
-- One could add some natural isomorphisms showing
-- how `Functor.pi` commutes with `Pi.eval` and `Pi.comap`.
@[simp]
theorem pi'_eval (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) : pi' f ⋙ Pi.eval C i = f i := by
apply Functor.ext
· intro _ _ _
simp
· intro _
rfl
/-- Two functors to a product category are equal iff they agree on every coordinate. -/
theorem pi_ext (f f' : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i) (h : ∀ i, f ⋙ (Pi.eval C i) = f' ⋙ (Pi.eval C i)) :
f = f' := by
apply Functor.ext; rotate_left
· intro X
ext i
specialize h i
have := congr_obj h X
simpa
· intro X Y g
dsimp
| funext i
specialize h i
have := congr_hom h g
simpa
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Pi/Basic.lean | 226 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Quotient
/-!
# Adjoining roots of polynomials
This file defines the commutative ring `AdjoinRoot f`, the ring R[X]/(f) obtained from a
commutative ring `R` and a polynomial `f : R[X]`. If furthermore `R` is a field and `f` is
irreducible, the field structure on `AdjoinRoot f` is constructed.
We suggest stating results on `IsAdjoinRoot` instead of `AdjoinRoot` to achieve higher
generality, since `IsAdjoinRoot` works for all different constructions of `R[α]`
including `AdjoinRoot f = R[X]/(f)` itself.
## Main definitions and results
The main definitions are in the `AdjoinRoot` namespace.
* `mk f : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `of f : R →+* AdjoinRoot f`, the natural ring homomorphism.
* `root f : AdjoinRoot f`, the image of X in R[X]/(f).
* `lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : (AdjoinRoot f) →+* S`, the ring
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `i : R →+* S` and sending `X` to `x`.
* `lift_hom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S`, the algebra
homomorphism from R[X]/(f) to S extending `algebraMap R S` and sending `X` to `x`
* `equiv : (AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[F] E) ≃ {x // x ∈ f.aroots E}` a
bijection between algebra homomorphisms from `AdjoinRoot` and roots of `f` in `S`
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
/-- Adjoin a root of a polynomial `f` to a commutative ring `R`. We define the new ring
as the quotient of `R[X]` by the principal ideal generated by `f`. -/
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
/-- Ring homomorphism from `R[x]` to `AdjoinRoot f` sending `X` to the `root`. -/
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : AdjoinRoot f → Prop} (x : AdjoinRoot f) (ih : ∀ p : R[X], C (mk f p)) :
C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
/-- Embedding of the original ring `R` into `AdjoinRoot f`. -/
def of : R →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
(mk f).comp C
instance instSMulAdjoinRoot [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : SMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.instSMul' _
instance [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : DistribSMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribSMul' _
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R[X]) :
a • mk f x = mk f (a • x) :=
rfl
theorem smul_of [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R) :
a • of f x = of f (a • x) := by rw [of, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, smul_mk, smul_C]
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [SMul R₁ R₂] [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.smulCommClass _ _
instance isScalarTower_right [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
IsScalarTower S (AdjoinRoot f) (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (f : R[X]) :
DistribMulAction S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribMulAction' _
/-- `R[x]/(f)` is `R`-algebra -/
@[stacks 09FX "second part"]
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.algebra S
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (AdjoinRoot f) = of f :=
rfl
variable (S) in
theorem algebraMap_eq' [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] :
algebraMap S (AdjoinRoot f) = (of f).comp (algebraMap S R) :=
rfl
theorem finiteType : Algebra.FiniteType R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FiniteType.polynomial R).of_surjective _ (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _)
theorem finitePresentation : Algebra.FinitePresentation R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FinitePresentation.polynomial R).quotient (Submodule.fg_span_singleton f)
/-- The adjoined root. -/
def root : AdjoinRoot f :=
mk f X
variable {f}
instance hasCoeT : CoeTC R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨of f⟩
/-- Two `R`-`AlgHom` from `AdjoinRoot f` to the same `R`-algebra are the same iff
they agree on `root f`. -/
@[ext]
theorem algHom_ext [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {g₁ g₂ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S}
(h : g₁ (root f) = g₂ (root f)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
Ideal.Quotient.algHom_ext R <| Polynomial.algHom_ext h
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {g h : R[X]} : mk f g = mk f h ↔ f ∣ g - h :=
Ideal.Quotient.eq.trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {g : R[X]} : mk f g = 0 ↔ f ∣ g :=
mk_eq_mk.trans <| by rw [sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem mk_self : mk f f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mpr (mem_span_singleton.2 <| by simp)
@[simp]
theorem mk_C (x : R) : mk f (C x) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X : mk f X = root f :=
rfl
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0) (hd : degree g < degree f) :
mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_degree_lt h0 hd
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0)
(hd : natDegree g < natDegree f) : mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt h0 hd
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (p : R[X]) : aeval (root f) p = mk f p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p
(fun x => by
rw [aeval_C]
rfl)
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [map_mul, aeval_C, map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, mk_C, RingHom.map_pow, mk_X]
rfl
theorem adjoinRoot_eq_top : Algebra.adjoin R ({root f} : Set (AdjoinRoot f)) = ⊤ := by
refine Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => ?_
induction x using AdjoinRoot.induction_on with
| ih p => exact (Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval R (root f)).symm ▸ ⟨p, aeval_eq p⟩
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_root (f : R[X]) : f.eval₂ (of f) (root f) = 0 := by
rw [← algebraMap_eq, ← aeval_def, aeval_eq, mk_self]
theorem isRoot_root (f : R[X]) : IsRoot (f.map (of f)) (root f) := by
rw [IsRoot, eval_map, eval₂_root]
theorem isAlgebraic_root (hf : f ≠ 0) : IsAlgebraic R (root f) :=
⟨f, hf, eval₂_root f⟩
theorem of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero [IsDomain R] (hf : f.degree ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (AdjoinRoot.of f) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro p hp
rw [AdjoinRoot.of, RingHom.comp_apply, AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero] at hp
by_cases h : f = 0
· exact C_eq_zero.mp (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (by rwa [h] at hp))
· contrapose! hf with h_contra
rw [← degree_C h_contra]
apply le_antisymm (degree_le_of_dvd hp (by rwa [Ne, C_eq_zero])) _
rwa [degree_C h_contra, zero_le_degree_iff]
variable [CommRing S]
/-- Lift a ring homomorphism `i : R →+* S` to `AdjoinRoot f →+* S`. -/
def lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →+* S := by
apply Ideal.Quotient.lift _ (eval₂RingHom i x)
intro g H
rcases mem_span_singleton.1 H with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [hy, RingHom.map_mul, coe_eval₂RingHom, h, zero_mul]
variable {i : R →+* S} {a : S} (h : f.eval₂ i a = 0)
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk (g : R[X]) : lift i a h (mk f g) = g.eval₂ i a :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
@[simp]
| theorem lift_root : lift i a h (root f) = a := by rw [root, lift_mk, eval₂_X]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 248 | 249 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
/-!
# Bilinear form and linear maps
This file describes the relation between bilinear forms and linear maps.
## TODO
A lot of this file is now redundant following the replacement of the dedicated `_root_.BilinForm`
structure with `LinearMap.BilinForm`, which is just an alias for `M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R`. For example
`LinearMap.BilinForm.toLinHom` is now just the identity map. This redundant code should be removed.
## Notations
Given any term `B` of type `BilinForm`, due to a coercion, can use
the notation `B x y` to refer to the function field, ie. `B x y = B.bilin x y`.
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M`, `M'`, ... are modules over the commutative semiring `R`,
- `M₁`, `M₁'`, ... are modules over the commutative ring `R₁`,
- `V`, ... is a vector space over the field `K`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilinear_form>
## Tags
Bilinear form,
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
open LinearMap (BilinMap)
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {V : Type*} {K : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
variable {B : BilinForm R M} {B₁ : BilinForm R₁ M₁}
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
section ToLin'
/-- Auxiliary definition to define `toLinHom`; see below. -/
def toLinHomAux₁ (A : BilinForm R M) (x : M) : M →ₗ[R] R := A x
variable (B)
theorem sum_left {α} (t : Finset α) (g : α → M) (w : M) :
B (∑ i ∈ t, g i) w = ∑ i ∈ t, B (g i) w :=
B.map_sum₂ t g w
variable (w : M)
theorem sum_right {α} (t : Finset α) (w : M) (g : α → M) :
B w (∑ i ∈ t, g i) = ∑ i ∈ t, B w (g i) := map_sum _ _ _
theorem sum_apply {α} (t : Finset α) (B : α → BilinForm R M) (v w : M) :
(∑ i ∈ t, B i) v w = ∑ i ∈ t, B i v w := by
simp only [coeFn_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
variable {B}
/-- The linear map obtained from a `BilinForm` by fixing the right co-ordinate and evaluating in
the left. -/
def toLinHomFlip : BilinForm R M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] R :=
flipHom.toLinearMap
theorem toLin'Flip_apply (A : BilinForm R M) (x : M) : toLinHomFlip (M := M) A x = fun y => A y x :=
rfl
end ToLin'
end BilinForm
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable {R' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R' R] [Module R' M] [IsScalarTower R' R M]
/-- Apply a linear map on the output of a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def compBilinForm (f : R →ₗ[R'] R') (B : BilinForm R M) : BilinForm R' M :=
compr₂ (restrictScalars₁₂ R' R' B) f
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
section Comp
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
/-- Apply a linear map on the left and right argument of a bilinear form. -/
def comp (B : BilinForm R M') (l r : M →ₗ[R] M') : BilinForm R M := B.compl₁₂ l r
/-- Apply a linear map to the left argument of a bilinear form. -/
def compLeft (B : BilinForm R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : BilinForm R M :=
B.comp f LinearMap.id
/-- Apply a linear map to the right argument of a bilinear form. -/
def compRight (B : BilinForm R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : BilinForm R M :=
B.comp LinearMap.id f
theorem comp_comp {M'' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M''] [Module R M''] (B : BilinForm R M'')
(l r : M →ₗ[R] M') (l' r' : M' →ₗ[R] M'') :
(B.comp l' r').comp l r = B.comp (l'.comp l) (r'.comp r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compLeft_compRight (B : BilinForm R M) (l r : M →ₗ[R] M) :
(B.compLeft l).compRight r = B.comp l r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compRight_compLeft (B : BilinForm R M) (l r : M →ₗ[R] M) :
(B.compRight r).compLeft l = B.comp l r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (B : BilinForm R M') (l r : M →ₗ[R] M') (v w) : B.comp l r v w = B (l v) (r w) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compLeft_apply (B : BilinForm R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v w) : B.compLeft f v w = B (f v) w :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compRight_apply (B : BilinForm R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v w) : B.compRight f v w = B v (f w) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id_left (B : BilinForm R M) (r : M →ₗ[R] M) :
B.comp LinearMap.id r = B.compRight r := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id_right (B : BilinForm R M) (l : M →ₗ[R] M) :
B.comp l LinearMap.id = B.compLeft l := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compLeft_id (B : BilinForm R M) : B.compLeft LinearMap.id = B := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compRight_id (B : BilinForm R M) : B.compRight LinearMap.id = B := by
ext
rfl
-- Shortcut for `comp_id_{left,right}` followed by `comp{Right,Left}_id`,
-- Needs higher priority to be applied
@[simp high]
theorem comp_id_id (B : BilinForm R M) : B.comp LinearMap.id LinearMap.id = B := by
ext
rfl
theorem comp_inj (B₁ B₂ : BilinForm R M') {l r : M →ₗ[R] M'} (hₗ : Function.Surjective l)
(hᵣ : Function.Surjective r) : B₁.comp l r = B₂.comp l r ↔ B₁ = B₂ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· -- B₁.comp l r = B₂.comp l r → B₁ = B₂
ext x y
obtain ⟨x', hx⟩ := hₗ x
subst hx
obtain ⟨y', hy⟩ := hᵣ y
subst hy
rw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, h]
· -- B₁ = B₂ → B₁.comp l r = B₂.comp l r
rw [h]
end Comp
variable {M' M'' : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M''] [Module R M'] [Module R M'']
section congr
/-- Apply a linear equivalence on the arguments of a bilinear form. -/
def congr (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') : BilinForm R M ≃ₗ[R] BilinForm R M' :=
LinearEquiv.congrRight (LinearEquiv.congrLeft _ _ e) ≪≫ₗ LinearEquiv.congrLeft _ _ e
@[simp]
theorem congr_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (B : BilinForm R M) (x y : M') :
congr e B x y = B (e.symm x) (e.symm y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem congr_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') : (congr e).symm = congr e.symm := by
ext
simp only [congr_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_symm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem congr_refl : congr (LinearEquiv.refl R M) = LinearEquiv.refl R _ :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => ext₂ fun _ _ => rfl
theorem congr_trans (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (f : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'') :
(congr e).trans (congr f) = congr (e.trans f) :=
rfl
theorem congr_congr (e : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'') (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (B : BilinForm R M) :
congr e (congr f B) = congr (f.trans e) B :=
rfl
theorem congr_comp (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') (B : BilinForm R M) (l r : M'' →ₗ[R] M') :
(congr e B).comp l r =
B.comp (LinearMap.comp (e.symm : M' →ₗ[R] M) l)
(LinearMap.comp (e.symm : M' →ₗ[R] M) r) :=
rfl
theorem comp_congr (e : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'') (B : BilinForm R M) (l r : M' →ₗ[R] M) :
congr e (B.comp l r) =
B.comp (l.comp (e.symm : M'' →ₗ[R] M')) (r.comp (e.symm : M'' →ₗ[R] M')) :=
rfl
end congr
section congrRight₂
variable {N₁ N₂ N₃ : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [AddCommMonoid N₃]
variable [Module R N₁] [Module R N₂] [Module R N₃]
/-- When `N₁` and `N₂` are equivalent, bilinear maps on `M` into `N₁` are equivalent to bilinear
maps into `N₂`. -/
def _root_.LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ (e : N₁ ≃ₗ[R] N₂) : BilinMap R M N₁ ≃ₗ[R] BilinMap R M N₂ :=
LinearEquiv.congrRight (LinearEquiv.congrRight e)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearEquiv.congrRight₂_apply (e : N₁ ≃ₗ[R] N₂) (B : BilinMap R M N₁) :
LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ e B = compr₂ B e := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearEquiv.congrRight₂_refl :
LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ (.refl R N₁) = .refl R (BilinMap R M N₁) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearEquiv.congrRight_symm (e : N₁ ≃ₗ[R] N₂) :
(LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ e (M := M)).symm = LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ e.symm :=
rfl
theorem _root_.LinearEquiv.congrRight₂_trans (e₁₂ : N₁ ≃ₗ[R] N₂) (e₂₃ : N₂ ≃ₗ[R] N₃) :
LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ (M := M) (e₁₂ ≪≫ₗ e₂₃) =
LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ e₁₂ ≪≫ₗ LinearEquiv.congrRight₂ e₂₃ :=
rfl
end congrRight₂
section LinMulLin
/-- `linMulLin f g` is the bilinear form mapping `x` and `y` to `f x * g y` -/
def linMulLin (f g : M →ₗ[R] R) : BilinForm R M := (LinearMap.mul R R).compl₁₂ f g
variable {f g : M →ₗ[R] R}
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_apply (x y) : linMulLin f g x y = f x * g y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_comp (l r : M' →ₗ[R] M) :
(linMulLin f g).comp l r = linMulLin (f.comp l) (g.comp r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_compLeft (l : M →ₗ[R] M) :
(linMulLin f g).compLeft l = linMulLin (f.comp l) g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_compRight (r : M →ₗ[R] M) :
(linMulLin f g).compRight r = linMulLin f (g.comp r) :=
rfl
end LinMulLin
section Basis
variable {F₂ : BilinForm R M}
variable {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M)
/-- Two bilinear forms are equal when they are equal on all basis vectors. -/
theorem ext_basis (h : ∀ i j, B (b i) (b j) = F₂ (b i) (b j)) : B = F₂ :=
b.ext fun i => b.ext fun j => h i j
/-- Write out `B x y` as a sum over `B (b i) (b j)` if `b` is a basis. -/
theorem sum_repr_mul_repr_mul (x y : M) :
((b.repr x).sum fun i xi => (b.repr y).sum fun j yj => xi • yj • B (b i) (b j)) = B x y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← b.linearCombination_repr x, ← b.linearCombination_repr y]
simp_rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply, Finsupp.sum, sum_left, sum_right, smul_left, smul_right,
smul_eq_mul]
end Basis
|
end BilinForm
end LinearMap
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/Hom.lean | 313 | 316 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.ModularLattice
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
/-!
# Atoms, Coatoms, and Simple Lattices
This module defines atoms, which are minimal non-`⊥` elements in bounded lattices, simple lattices,
which are lattices with only two elements, and related ideas.
## Main definitions
### Atoms and Coatoms
* `IsAtom a` indicates that the only element below `a` is `⊥`.
* `IsCoatom a` indicates that the only element above `a` is `⊤`.
### Atomic and Atomistic Lattices
* `IsAtomic` indicates that every element other than `⊥` is above an atom.
* `IsCoatomic` indicates that every element other than `⊤` is below a coatom.
* `IsAtomistic` indicates that every element is the `sSup` of a set of atoms.
* `IsCoatomistic` indicates that every element is the `sInf` of a set of coatoms.
* `IsStronglyAtomic` indicates that for all `a < b`, there is some `x` with `a ⋖ x ≤ b`.
* `IsStronglyCoatomic` indicates that for all `a < b`, there is some `x` with `a ≤ x ⋖ b`.
### Simple Lattices
* `IsSimpleOrder` indicates that an order has only two unique elements, `⊥` and `⊤`.
* `IsSimpleOrder.boundedOrder`
* `IsSimpleOrder.distribLattice`
* Given an instance of `IsSimpleOrder`, we provide the following definitions. These are not
made global instances as they contain data :
* `IsSimpleOrder.booleanAlgebra`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeLattice`
* `IsSimpleOrder.completeBooleanAlgebra`
## Main results
* `isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom` and `isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom` express the (definitional) duality
of `IsAtom` and `IsCoatom`.
* `isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top` and `isSimpleOrder_iff_isCoatom_bot` express the
connection between atoms, coatoms, and simple lattices
* `IsCompl.isAtom_iff_isCoatom` and `IsCompl.isCoatom_if_isAtom`: In a modular
bounded lattice, a complement of an atom is a coatom and vice versa.
* `isAtomic_iff_isCoatomic`: A modular complemented lattice is atomic iff it is coatomic.
-/
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
section Atoms
section IsAtom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
/-- An atom of an `OrderBot` is an element with no other element between it and `⊥`,
which is not `⊥`. -/
def IsAtom (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b, b < a → b = ⊥
theorem IsAtom.Iic (ha : IsAtom a) (hax : a ≤ x) : IsAtom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Iic x) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 con), fun ⟨b, _⟩ hba => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 (ha.2 b hba)⟩
theorem IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic {a : Set.Iic x} (ha : IsAtom a) : IsAtom (a : α) :=
⟨fun con => ha.1 (Subtype.ext con), fun b hba =>
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (ha.2 ⟨b, hba.le.trans a.prop⟩ hba)⟩
theorem isAtom_iff_le_of_ge : IsAtom a ↔ a ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊥, b ≤ a → a ≤ b :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
forall_congr' fun b => by
simp only [Ne, @not_imp_comm (b = ⊥), Classical.not_imp, lt_iff_le_not_le]
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsAtom.lt_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x < a ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨h.2 x, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h.1.bot_lt⟩
theorem IsAtom.le_iff (h : IsAtom a) : x ≤ a ↔ x = ⊥ ∨ x = a := by rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, h.lt_iff]
lemma IsAtom.bot_lt (h : IsAtom a) : ⊥ < a :=
h.lt_iff.mpr rfl
lemma IsAtom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsAtom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊥) : b ≤ a ↔ b = a :=
ha.le_iff.trans <| or_iff_right hb
theorem IsAtom.Iic_eq (h : IsAtom a) : Set.Iic a = {⊥, a} :=
Set.ext fun _ => h.le_iff
@[simp]
theorem bot_covBy_iff : ⊥ ⋖ a ↔ IsAtom a := by
simp only [CovBy, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, IsAtom, not_imp_not]
alias ⟨CovBy.is_atom, IsAtom.bot_covBy⟩ := bot_covBy_iff
end PartialOrder
theorem atom_le_iSup [Order.Frame α] {a : α} (ha : IsAtom a) {f : ι → α} :
a ≤ iSup f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => le_trans hi (le_iSup _ _)⟩
show (a ≤ ⨆ i, f i) → _
refine fun h => of_not_not fun ha' => ?_
push_neg at ha'
have ha'' : Disjoint a (⨆ i, f i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff.2 fun i => fun x hxa hxf => le_bot_iff.2 <| of_not_not fun hx =>
have hxa : x < a := (le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hxa).resolve_left (by rintro rfl; exact ha' _ hxf)
hx (ha.2 _ hxa)
obtain rfl := le_bot_iff.1 (ha'' le_rfl h)
exact ha.1 rfl
end IsAtom
section IsCoatom
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A coatom of an `OrderTop` is an element with no other element between it and `⊤`,
which is not `⊤`. -/
def IsCoatom [OrderTop α] (a : α) : Prop :=
a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b, a < b → b = ⊤
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom [OrderBot α] {a : α} :
IsCoatom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom [OrderTop α] {a : α} :
IsAtom (OrderDual.toDual a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsAtom.dual⟩ := isCoatom_dual_iff_isAtom
alias ⟨_, IsCoatom.dual⟩ := isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom
variable [OrderTop α] {a x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.Ici (ha : IsCoatom a) (hax : x ≤ a) : IsCoatom (⟨a, hax⟩ : Set.Ici x) :=
ha.dual.Iic hax
theorem IsCoatom.of_isCoatom_coe_Ici {a : Set.Ici x} (ha : IsCoatom a) : IsCoatom (a : α) :=
@IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic αᵒᵈ _ _ x a ha
theorem isCoatom_iff_ge_of_le : IsCoatom a ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ b ≠ ⊤, a ≤ b → b ≤ a :=
isAtom_iff_le_of_ge (α := αᵒᵈ)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b x : α}
theorem IsCoatom.lt_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a < x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem IsCoatom.le_iff (h : IsCoatom a) : a ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ ∨ x = a :=
h.dual.le_iff
lemma IsCoatom.lt_top (h : IsCoatom a) : a < ⊤ :=
h.lt_iff.mpr rfl
lemma IsCoatom.le_iff_eq (ha : IsCoatom a) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a ≤ b ↔ b = a := ha.dual.le_iff_eq hb
theorem IsCoatom.Ici_eq (h : IsCoatom a) : Set.Ici a = {⊤, a} :=
h.dual.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem covBy_top_iff : a ⋖ ⊤ ↔ IsCoatom a :=
toDual_covBy_toDual_iff.symm.trans bot_covBy_iff
alias ⟨CovBy.isCoatom, IsCoatom.covBy_top⟩ := covBy_top_iff
namespace SetLike
variable {A B : Type*} [SetLike A B]
theorem isAtom_iff [OrderBot A] {K : A} :
IsAtom K ↔ K ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ H g, H ≤ K → g ∉ H → g ∈ K → H = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [IsAtom, lt_iff_le_not_le, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists,
and_comm (a := _ ≤ _), and_imp, exists_imp, ← and_imp, and_comm]
theorem isCoatom_iff [OrderTop A] {K : A} :
IsCoatom K ↔ K ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → g ∉ K → g ∈ H → H = ⊤ := by
simp_rw [IsCoatom, lt_iff_le_not_le, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists,
and_comm (a := _ ≤ _), and_imp, exists_imp, ← and_imp, and_comm]
theorem covBy_iff {K L : A} :
K ⋖ L ↔ K < L ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → H ≤ L → g ∉ K → g ∈ H → H = L := by
refine and_congr_right fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun H ↦ not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_and_and_comm]
simp_rw [exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, ← and_assoc, and_comm, exists_and_left,
SetLike.not_le_iff_exists, and_comm, implies_true]
/-- Dual variant of `SetLike.covBy_iff` -/
theorem covBy_iff' {K L : A} :
K ⋖ L ↔ K < L ∧ ∀ H g, K ≤ H → H ≤ L → g ∉ H → g ∈ L → H = K := by
refine and_congr_right fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun H ↦ not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_not_le, and_and_and_comm]
simp_rw [exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff, ← and_assoc, and_comm, exists_and_left,
SetLike.not_le_iff_exists, ne_comm, implies_true]
end SetLike
end PartialOrder
theorem iInf_le_coatom [Order.Coframe α] {a : α} (ha : IsCoatom a) {f : ι → α} :
iInf f ≤ a ↔ ∃ i, f i ≤ a :=
atom_le_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
end IsCoatom
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem Set.Ici.isAtom_iff {b : Set.Ici a} : IsAtom b ↔ a ⋖ b := by
rw [← bot_covBy_iff]
refine (Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderEmbedding.subtype fun c => a ≤ c) ?_).symm
simpa only [OrderEmbedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using Set.ordConnected_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Set.Iic.isCoatom_iff {a : Set.Iic b} : IsCoatom a ↔ ↑a ⋖ b := by
rw [← covBy_top_iff]
refine (Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderEmbedding.subtype fun c => c ≤ b) ?_).symm
simpa only [OrderEmbedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using Set.ordConnected_Iic
theorem covBy_iff_atom_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : a ⋖ b ↔ IsAtom (⟨b, h⟩ : Set.Ici a) := by simp
theorem covBy_iff_coatom_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : a ⋖ b ↔ IsCoatom (⟨a, h⟩ : Set.Iic b) := by simp
end PartialOrder
section Pairwise
theorem IsAtom.inf_eq_bot_of_ne [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} (ha : IsAtom a)
(hb : IsAtom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b = ⊥ :=
hab.not_le_or_not_le.elim (ha.lt_iff.1 ∘ inf_lt_left.2) (hb.lt_iff.1 ∘ inf_lt_right.2)
theorem IsAtom.disjoint_of_ne [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} (ha : IsAtom a)
(hb : IsAtom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : Disjoint a b :=
disjoint_iff.mpr (ha.inf_eq_bot_of_ne hb hab)
theorem IsCoatom.sup_eq_top_of_ne [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α} (ha : IsCoatom a)
(hb : IsCoatom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊔ b = ⊤ :=
ha.dual.inf_eq_bot_of_ne hb.dual hab
theorem IsCoatom.codisjoint_of_ne [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α} (ha : IsCoatom a)
(hb : IsCoatom b) (hab : a ≠ b) : Codisjoint a b :=
codisjoint_iff.mpr (ha.sup_eq_top_of_ne hb hab)
end Pairwise
end Atoms
section Atomic
variable [PartialOrder α] (α)
/-- A lattice is atomic iff every element other than `⊥` has an atom below it. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsAtomic [OrderBot α] : Prop where
/-- Every element other than `⊥` has an atom below it. -/
eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le : ∀ b : α, b = ⊥ ∨ ∃ a : α, IsAtom a ∧ a ≤ b
/-- A lattice is coatomic iff every element other than `⊤` has a coatom above it. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCoatomic [OrderTop α] : Prop where
/-- Every element other than `⊤` has an atom above it. -/
eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom : ∀ b : α, b = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a : α, IsCoatom a ∧ b ≤ a
export IsAtomic (eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le)
export IsCoatomic (eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom)
lemma IsAtomic.exists_atom [OrderBot α] [Nontrivial α] [IsAtomic α] : ∃ a : α, IsAtom a :=
have ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_ne (⊥ : α)
have ⟨a, ha⟩ := (eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le b).resolve_left hb
⟨a, ha.1⟩
lemma IsCoatomic.exists_coatom [OrderTop α] [Nontrivial α] [IsCoatomic α] : ∃ a : α, IsCoatom a :=
have ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_ne (⊤ : α)
have ⟨a, ha⟩ := (eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom b).resolve_left hb
⟨a, ha.1⟩
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem isCoatomic_dual_iff_isAtomic [OrderBot α] : IsCoatomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsAtomic α :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom⟩, fun h =>
⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic [OrderTop α] : IsAtomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsCoatomic α :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le⟩, fun h =>
⟨fun b => by apply h.eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom⟩⟩
namespace IsAtomic
variable [OrderBot α] [IsAtomic α]
instance _root_.OrderDual.instIsCoatomic : IsCoatomic αᵒᵈ :=
isCoatomic_dual_iff_isAtomic.2 ‹IsAtomic α›
instance Set.Iic.isAtomic {x : α} : IsAtomic (Set.Iic x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le y).imp Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 fun ⟨a, ha, hay⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, hay.trans hy⟩, ha.Iic (hay.trans hy), hay⟩⟩
end IsAtomic
namespace IsCoatomic
variable [OrderTop α] [IsCoatomic α]
instance _root_.OrderDual.instIsAtomic : IsAtomic αᵒᵈ :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.2 ‹IsCoatomic α›
instance Set.Ici.isCoatomic {x : α} : IsCoatomic (Set.Ici x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom y).imp Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 fun ⟨a, ha, hay⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, le_trans hy hay⟩, ha.Ici (le_trans hy hay), hay⟩⟩
end IsCoatomic
theorem isAtomic_iff_forall_isAtomic_Iic [OrderBot α] :
IsAtomic α ↔ ∀ x : α, IsAtomic (Set.Iic x) :=
⟨@IsAtomic.Set.Iic.isAtomic _ _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun x =>
((@eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le _ _ _ (h x)) (⊤ : Set.Iic x)).imp Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1
(Exists.imp' (↑) fun ⟨_, _⟩ => And.imp_left IsAtom.of_isAtom_coe_Iic)⟩⟩
theorem isCoatomic_iff_forall_isCoatomic_Ici [OrderTop α] :
IsCoatomic α ↔ ∀ x : α, IsCoatomic (Set.Ici x) :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.symm.trans <|
isAtomic_iff_forall_isAtomic_Iic.trans <|
forall_congr' fun _ => isCoatomic_dual_iff_isAtomic.symm.trans Iff.rfl
section StronglyAtomic
variable {α : Type*} {a b : α} [Preorder α]
/-- An order is strongly atomic if every nontrivial interval `[a, b]`
contains an element covering `a`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsStronglyAtomic (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : Prop where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt : ∀ (a b : α), a < b → ∃ x, a ⋖ x ∧ x ≤ b
theorem exists_covBy_le_of_lt [IsStronglyAtomic α] (h : a < b) : ∃ x, a ⋖ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
IsStronglyAtomic.exists_covBy_le_of_lt a b h
alias LT.lt.exists_covby_le := exists_covBy_le_of_lt
/-- An order is strongly coatomic if every nontrivial interval `[a, b]`
contains an element covered by `b`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsStronglyCoatomic (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : Prop where
(exists_le_covBy_of_lt : ∀ (a b : α), a < b → ∃ x, a ≤ x ∧ x ⋖ b)
theorem exists_le_covBy_of_lt [IsStronglyCoatomic α] (h : a < b) : ∃ x, a ≤ x ∧ x ⋖ b :=
IsStronglyCoatomic.exists_le_covBy_of_lt a b h
alias LT.lt.exists_le_covby := exists_le_covBy_of_lt
theorem isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic :
IsStronglyAtomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsStronglyCoatomic α := by
simpa [isStronglyAtomic_iff, OrderDual.exists, OrderDual.forall,
OrderDual.toDual_le_toDual, and_comm, isStronglyCoatomic_iff] using forall_comm
@[simp] theorem isStronglyCoatomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyAtomic :
IsStronglyCoatomic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsStronglyAtomic α := by
rw [← isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instIsStronglyCoatomic [IsStronglyAtomic α] : IsStronglyCoatomic αᵒᵈ := by
rwa [isStronglyCoatomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyAtomic]
instance [IsStronglyCoatomic α] : IsStronglyAtomic αᵒᵈ := by
rwa [isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]
instance IsStronglyAtomic.isAtomic (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] [IsStronglyAtomic α] :
IsAtomic α where
eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le a := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
refine fun hlt ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ := hlt.exists_covby_le
exact ⟨x, bot_covBy_iff.1 hx, hxa⟩
instance IsStronglyCoatomic.toIsCoatomic (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α]
[IsStronglyCoatomic α] : IsCoatomic α :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.1 <| IsStronglyAtomic.isAtomic (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyAtomic [IsStronglyAtomic α] {s : Set α}
(h : Set.OrdConnected s) : IsStronglyAtomic s where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ hcd
obtain ⟨x, hcx, hxd⟩ := (Subtype.mk_lt_mk.1 hcd).exists_covby_le
exact ⟨⟨x, h.out' hc hd ⟨hcx.le, hxd⟩⟩,
⟨by simpa using hcx.lt, fun y hy hy' ↦ hcx.2 (by simpa using hy) (by simpa using hy')⟩, hxd⟩
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyCoatomic [IsStronglyCoatomic α] {s : Set α}
(h : Set.OrdConnected s) : IsStronglyCoatomic s :=
isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic.1 h.dual.isStronglyAtomic
instance [IsStronglyAtomic α] {s : Set α} [Set.OrdConnected s] : IsStronglyAtomic s :=
Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyAtomic <| by assumption
instance [IsStronglyCoatomic α] {s : Set α} [h : Set.OrdConnected s] : IsStronglyCoatomic s :=
Set.OrdConnected.isStronglyCoatomic <| by assumption
instance SuccOrder.toIsStronglyAtomic [SuccOrder α] : IsStronglyAtomic α where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt a _ hab :=
⟨SuccOrder.succ a, Order.covBy_succ_of_not_isMax fun ha ↦ ha.not_lt hab,
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt hab⟩
instance [PredOrder α] : IsStronglyCoatomic α := by
rw [← isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]; infer_instance
end StronglyAtomic
section WellFounded
theorem IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt (h : WellFounded ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop)) :
IsStronglyAtomic α where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt a b hab := by
refine ⟨WellFounded.min h (Set.Ioc a b) ⟨b, hab,rfl.le⟩, ?_⟩
have hmem := (WellFounded.min_mem h (Set.Ioc a b) ⟨b, hab,rfl.le⟩)
exact ⟨⟨hmem.1,fun c hac hlt ↦ WellFounded.not_lt_min h
(Set.Ioc a b) ⟨b, hab,rfl.le⟩ ⟨hac, hlt.le.trans hmem.2⟩ hlt ⟩, hmem.2⟩
theorem IsStronglyCoatomic.of_wellFounded_gt (h : WellFounded ((· > ·) : α → α → Prop)) :
IsStronglyCoatomic α :=
isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic.1 <| IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt (α := αᵒᵈ) h
instance [WellFoundedLT α] : IsStronglyAtomic α :=
IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt wellFounded_lt
instance [WellFoundedGT α] : IsStronglyCoatomic α :=
IsStronglyCoatomic.of_wellFounded_gt wellFounded_gt
theorem isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt [OrderBot α]
(h : WellFounded ((· < ·) : α → α → Prop)) : IsAtomic α :=
(IsStronglyAtomic.of_wellFounded_lt h).isAtomic
theorem isCoatomic_of_orderTop_gt_wellFounded [OrderTop α]
(h : WellFounded ((· > ·) : α → α → Prop)) : IsCoatomic α :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.1 (@isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ h)
end WellFounded
namespace BooleanAlgebra
theorem le_iff_atom_le_imp {α} [BooleanAlgebra α] [IsAtomic α] {x y : α} :
x ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, IsAtom a → a ≤ x → a ≤ y := by
refine ⟨fun h a _ => (le_trans · h), fun h => ?_⟩
have : x ⊓ yᶜ = ⊥ := of_not_not fun hbot =>
have ⟨a, ha, hle⟩ := (eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le _).resolve_left hbot
have ⟨hx, hy'⟩ := le_inf_iff.1 hle
have hy := h a ha hx
have : a ≤ y ⊓ yᶜ := le_inf_iff.2 ⟨hy, hy'⟩
ha.1 (by simpa using this)
exact (eq_compl_iff_isCompl.1 (by simp)).inf_right_eq_bot_iff.1 this
theorem eq_iff_atom_le_iff {α} [BooleanAlgebra α] [IsAtomic α] {x y : α} :
x = y ↔ ∀ a, IsAtom a → (a ≤ x ↔ a ≤ y) := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ by simp, fun h => ?_⟩
exact le_antisymm (le_iff_atom_le_imp.2 fun a ha hx => (h a ha).1 hx)
(le_iff_atom_le_imp.2 fun a ha hy => (h a ha).2 hy)
end BooleanAlgebra
namespace CompleteBooleanAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev toCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra {α} [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] [IsAtomic α] :
CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹CompleteBooleanAlgebra α›
iInf_iSup_eq f := BooleanAlgebra.eq_iff_atom_le_iff.2 fun a ha => by
simp only [le_iInf_iff, atom_le_iSup ha]
rw [Classical.skolem]
end CompleteBooleanAlgebra
end Atomic
section Atomistic
variable (α) [PartialOrder α]
/-- A lattice is atomistic iff every element is a `sSup` of a set of atoms. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsAtomistic [OrderBot α] : Prop where
/-- Every element is a `sSup` of a set of atoms. -/
isLUB_atoms : ∀ b : α, ∃ s : Set α, IsLUB s b ∧ ∀ a, a ∈ s → IsAtom a
/-- A lattice is coatomistic iff every element is an `sInf` of a set of coatoms. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCoatomistic [OrderTop α] : Prop where
/-- Every element is a `sInf` of a set of coatoms. -/
isGLB_coatoms : ∀ b : α, ∃ s : Set α, IsGLB s b ∧ ∀ a, a ∈ s → IsCoatom a
export IsAtomistic (isLUB_atoms)
export IsCoatomistic (isGLB_coatoms)
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem isCoatomistic_dual_iff_isAtomistic [OrderBot α] : IsCoatomistic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsAtomistic α :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.isGLB_coatoms⟩, fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.isLUB_atoms⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem isAtomistic_dual_iff_isCoatomistic [OrderTop α] : IsAtomistic αᵒᵈ ↔ IsCoatomistic α :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.isLUB_atoms⟩, fun h => ⟨fun b => by apply h.isGLB_coatoms⟩⟩
namespace IsAtomistic
instance _root_.OrderDual.instIsCoatomistic [OrderBot α] [h : IsAtomistic α] : IsCoatomistic αᵒᵈ :=
isCoatomistic_dual_iff_isAtomistic.2 h
variable [OrderBot α] [IsAtomistic α]
instance (priority := 100) : IsAtomic α :=
⟨fun b => by
rcases isLUB_atoms b with ⟨s, hsb, hs⟩
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩
· simp_all
· exact Or.inr ⟨a, hs _ ha, hsb.1 ha⟩⟩
end IsAtomistic
section IsAtomistic
variable [OrderBot α] [IsAtomistic α]
theorem isLUB_atoms_le (b : α) : IsLUB { a : α | IsAtom a ∧ a ≤ b } b := by
rcases isLUB_atoms b with ⟨s, hsb, hs⟩
exact ⟨fun c hc ↦ hc.2, fun c hc ↦ hsb.2 fun i hi ↦ hc ⟨hs _ hi, hsb.1 hi⟩⟩
theorem isLUB_atoms_top [OrderTop α] : IsLUB { a : α | IsAtom a } ⊤ := by
simpa using isLUB_atoms_le (⊤ : α)
theorem le_iff_atom_le_imp {a b : α} : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ c : α, IsAtom c → c ≤ a → c ≤ b :=
⟨fun hab _ _ hca ↦ hca.trans hab,
fun h ↦ (isLUB_atoms_le a).mono (isLUB_atoms_le b) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨h₁, h _ h₁ h₂⟩⟩
theorem eq_iff_atom_le_iff {a b : α} : a = b ↔ ∀ c, IsAtom c → (c ≤ a ↔ c ≤ b) := by
refine ⟨fun h => by simp [h], fun h => ?_⟩
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_iff_atom_le_imp, le_iff_atom_le_imp]
aesop
end IsAtomistic
namespace IsCoatomistic
variable [OrderTop α]
instance _root_.OrderDual.instIsAtomistic [h : IsCoatomistic α] : IsAtomistic αᵒᵈ :=
isAtomistic_dual_iff_isCoatomistic.2 h
variable [IsCoatomistic α]
instance (priority := 100) : IsCoatomic α :=
⟨fun b => by
rcases isGLB_coatoms b with ⟨s, hsb, hs⟩
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩
· simp_all
· exact Or.inr ⟨a, hs _ ha, hsb.1 ha⟩⟩
end IsCoatomistic
section CompleteLattice
@[simp]
theorem sSup_atoms_le_eq {α} [CompleteLattice α] [IsAtomistic α] (b : α) :
sSup { a : α | IsAtom a ∧ a ≤ b } = b :=
(isLUB_atoms_le b).sSup_eq
@[simp]
theorem sSup_atoms_eq_top {α} [CompleteLattice α] [IsAtomistic α] :
sSup { a : α | IsAtom a } = ⊤ :=
isLUB_atoms_top.sSup_eq
nonrec lemma CompleteLattice.isAtomistic_iff {α} [CompleteLattice α] :
IsAtomistic α ↔ ∀ b : α, ∃ s : Set α, b = sSup s ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, IsAtom a := by
simp_rw [isAtomistic_iff, isLUB_iff_sSup_eq, eq_comm]
lemma eq_sSup_atoms {α} [CompleteLattice α] [IsAtomistic α] (b : α) :
∃ s : Set α, b = sSup s ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, IsAtom a :=
CompleteLattice.isAtomistic_iff.1 ‹_› b
nonrec lemma CompleteLattice.isCoatomistic_iff {α} [CompleteLattice α] :
IsCoatomistic α ↔ ∀ b : α, ∃ s : Set α, b = sInf s ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, IsCoatom a := by
simp_rw [isCoatomistic_iff, isGLB_iff_sInf_eq, eq_comm]
lemma eq_sInf_coatoms {α} [CompleteLattice α] [IsCoatomistic α] (b : α) :
∃ s : Set α, b = sInf s ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, IsCoatom a :=
CompleteLattice.isCoatomistic_iff.1 ‹_› b
end CompleteLattice
namespace CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra
instance {α} [CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra α] : IsAtomistic α :=
CompleteLattice.isAtomistic_iff.2 fun b ↦ by
inhabit α
refine ⟨{ a | IsAtom a ∧ a ≤ b }, ?_, fun a ha => ha.1⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ (sSup_le fun c hc => hc.2)
have : (⨅ c : α, ⨆ x, b ⊓ cond x c (cᶜ)) = b := by simp [iSup_bool_eq, iInf_const]
rw [← this]; clear this
simp_rw [iInf_iSup_eq, iSup_le_iff]; intro g
if h : (⨅ a, b ⊓ cond (g a) a (aᶜ)) = ⊥ then simp [h] else
refine le_sSup ⟨⟨h, fun c hc => ?_⟩, le_trans (by rfl) (le_iSup _ g)⟩; clear h
have := lt_of_lt_of_le hc (le_trans (iInf_le _ c) inf_le_right)
revert this
nontriviality α
cases g c <;> simp
instance {α} [CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra α] : IsCoatomistic α :=
isAtomistic_dual_iff_isCoatomistic.1 inferInstance
end CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra
end Atomistic
/-- An order is simple iff it has exactly two elements, `⊥` and `⊤`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsSimpleOrder (α : Type*) [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] : Prop extends Nontrivial α where
/-- Every element is either `⊥` or `⊤` -/
eq_bot_or_eq_top : ∀ a : α, a = ⊥ ∨ a = ⊤
export IsSimpleOrder (eq_bot_or_eq_top)
theorem isSimpleOrder_iff_isSimpleOrder_orderDual [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] :
IsSimpleOrder α ↔ IsSimpleOrder αᵒᵈ := by
constructor <;> intro i <;> haveI := i
· exact
{ exists_pair_ne := @exists_pair_ne α _
eq_bot_or_eq_top := fun a => Or.symm (eq_bot_or_eq_top (OrderDual.ofDual a) : _ ∨ _) }
· exact
{ exists_pair_ne := @exists_pair_ne αᵒᵈ _
eq_bot_or_eq_top := fun a => Or.symm (eq_bot_or_eq_top (OrderDual.toDual a)) }
theorem IsSimpleOrder.bot_ne_top [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] : (⊥ : α) ≠ (⊤ : α) := by
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := exists_pair_ne α
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top a with (rfl | rfl) <;> rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top b with (rfl | rfl) <;>
first |simpa|simpa using h.symm
section IsSimpleOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α]
instance OrderDual.instIsSimpleOrder {α} [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] :
IsSimpleOrder αᵒᵈ := isSimpleOrder_iff_isSimpleOrder_orderDual.1 (by infer_instance)
/-- A simple `BoundedOrder` induces a preorder. This is not an instance to prevent loops. -/
protected def IsSimpleOrder.preorder {α} [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] :
Preorder α where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := by rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top a with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
le_trans a b c := by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top a with (rfl | rfl)
· simp
· rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top b with (rfl | rfl)
· rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top c with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
· simp
/-- A simple partial ordered `BoundedOrder` induces a linear order.
This is not an instance to prevent loops. -/
protected def IsSimpleOrder.linearOrder [DecidableEq α] : LinearOrder α :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder α) with
le_total := fun a b => by rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top a with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
-- Note from #23976: do we want this inlined or should this be a separate definition?
toDecidableLE := fun a b =>
if ha : a = ⊥ then isTrue (ha.le.trans bot_le)
else
if hb : b = ⊤ then isTrue (le_top.trans hb.ge)
else
isFalse fun H =>
hb (top_unique (le_trans (top_le_iff.mpr (Or.resolve_left
(eq_bot_or_eq_top a) ha)) H))
toDecidableEq := ‹_› }
theorem isAtom_top : IsAtom (⊤ : α) :=
⟨top_ne_bot, fun a ha => Or.resolve_right (eq_bot_or_eq_top a) (ne_of_lt ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem isAtom_iff_eq_top {a : α} : IsAtom a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ (eq_bot_or_eq_top a).resolve_left h.1, (· ▸ isAtom_top)⟩
theorem isCoatom_bot : IsCoatom (⊥ : α) :=
isAtom_dual_iff_isCoatom.1 isAtom_top
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_iff_eq_bot {a : α} : IsCoatom a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h ↦ (eq_bot_or_eq_top a).resolve_right h.1, (· ▸ isCoatom_bot)⟩
theorem bot_covBy_top : (⊥ : α) ⋖ ⊤ :=
isAtom_top.bot_covBy
end IsSimpleOrder
namespace IsSimpleOrder
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b)
include h
theorem eq_bot_of_lt : a = ⊥ :=
(IsSimpleOrder.eq_bot_or_eq_top _).resolve_right h.ne_top
theorem eq_top_of_lt : b = ⊤ :=
(IsSimpleOrder.eq_bot_or_eq_top _).resolve_left h.ne_bot
alias _root_.LT.lt.eq_bot := eq_bot_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.eq_top := eq_top_of_lt
end Preorder
section BoundedOrder
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α]
/-- A simple partial ordered `BoundedOrder` induces a lattice.
This is not an instance to prevent loops -/
protected def lattice {α} [DecidableEq α] [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] :
Lattice α :=
@LinearOrder.toLattice α IsSimpleOrder.linearOrder
/-- A lattice that is a `BoundedOrder` is a distributive lattice.
This is not an instance to prevent loops -/
protected def distribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ (inferInstance : Lattice α) with
le_sup_inf := fun x y z => by rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) : IsAtomic α :=
⟨fun b => (eq_bot_or_eq_top b).imp_right fun h => ⟨⊤, ⟨isAtom_top, ge_of_eq h⟩⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) : IsCoatomic α :=
isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic.1 (by infer_instance)
end BoundedOrder
-- It is important that in this section `IsSimpleOrder` is the last type-class argument.
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α] [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α]
/-- Every simple lattice is isomorphic to `Bool`, regardless of order. -/
@[simps]
def equivBool {α} [DecidableEq α] [LE α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] : α ≃ Bool where
toFun x := x = ⊤
invFun x := x.casesOn ⊥ ⊤
left_inv x := by rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [bot_ne_top]
right_inv x := by cases x <;> simp [bot_ne_top]
/-- Every simple lattice over a partial order is order-isomorphic to `Bool`. -/
def orderIsoBool : α ≃o Bool :=
{ equivBool with
map_rel_iff' := @fun a b => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top a with (rfl | rfl)
· simp [bot_ne_top]
· rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top b with (rfl | rfl)
· simp [bot_ne_top.symm, bot_ne_top, Bool.false_lt_true]
· simp [bot_ne_top] }
/-- A simple `BoundedOrder` is also a `BooleanAlgebra`. -/
protected def booleanAlgebra {α} [DecidableEq α] [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α] :
BooleanAlgebra α :=
{ inferInstanceAs (BoundedOrder α), IsSimpleOrder.distribLattice with
compl := fun x => if x = ⊥ then ⊤ else ⊥
sdiff := fun x y => if x = ⊤ ∧ y = ⊥ then ⊤ else ⊥
sdiff_eq := fun x y => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [bot_ne_top, SDiff.sdiff, compl]
inf_compl_le_bot := fun x => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· simp
· simp
top_le_sup_compl := fun x => by rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp }
end DecidableEq
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α]
open Classical in
/-- A simple `BoundedOrder` is also complete. -/
protected noncomputable def completeLattice : CompleteLattice α :=
{ (inferInstance : Lattice α),
(inferInstance : BoundedOrder α) with
sSup := fun s => if ⊤ ∈ s then ⊤ else ⊥
sInf := fun s => if ⊥ ∈ s then ⊥ else ⊤
le_sSup := fun s x h => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· exact bot_le
· rw [if_pos h]
sSup_le := fun s x h => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· rw [if_neg]
intro con
exact bot_ne_top (eq_top_iff.2 (h ⊤ con))
· exact le_top
sInf_le := fun s x h => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· rw [if_pos h]
· exact le_top
le_sInf := fun s x h => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· exact bot_le
· rw [if_neg]
intro con
exact top_ne_bot (eq_bot_iff.2 (h ⊥ con)) }
open Classical in
/-- A simple `BoundedOrder` is also a `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`. -/
protected noncomputable def completeBooleanAlgebra : CompleteBooleanAlgebra α :=
{ __ := IsSimpleOrder.completeLattice
__ := IsSimpleOrder.booleanAlgebra
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := fun x s => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· simp [bot_sup_eq, ← sInf_eq_iInf]
· simp only [top_le_iff, top_sup_eq, iInf_top, le_sInf_iff, le_refl]
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf := fun x s => by
rcases eq_bot_or_eq_top x with (rfl | rfl)
· simp only [le_bot_iff, sSup_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq, iSup_bot, le_refl]
· simp only [top_inf_eq, ← sSup_eq_iSup]
exact le_rfl }
instance : ComplementedLattice α :=
letI := IsSimpleOrder.completeBooleanAlgebra (α := α); inferInstance
end IsSimpleOrder
namespace IsSimpleOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] [IsSimpleOrder α]
instance (priority := 100) : IsAtomistic α where
isLUB_atoms b := (eq_bot_or_eq_top b).elim (fun h ↦ ⟨∅, by simp [h]⟩) (fun h ↦ ⟨{⊤}, by simp [h]⟩)
instance (priority := 100) : IsCoatomistic α :=
isAtomistic_dual_iff_isCoatomistic.1 (by infer_instance)
end IsSimpleOrder
theorem isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] :
IsSimpleOrder α ↔ IsAtom (⊤ : α) :=
⟨fun h => @isAtom_top _ _ _ h, fun h =>
{ exists_pair_ne := ⟨⊤, ⊥, h.1⟩
eq_bot_or_eq_top := fun a => ((eq_or_lt_of_le le_top).imp_right (h.2 a)).symm }⟩
theorem isSimpleOrder_iff_isCoatom_bot [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] :
IsSimpleOrder α ↔ IsCoatom (⊥ : α) :=
isSimpleOrder_iff_isSimpleOrder_orderDual.trans isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top
namespace Set
theorem isSimpleOrder_Iic_iff_isAtom [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a : α} :
IsSimpleOrder (Iic a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top.trans <|
and_congr (not_congr Subtype.mk_eq_mk)
⟨fun h b ab => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (h ⟨b, le_of_lt ab⟩ ab), fun h ⟨b, _⟩ hbotb =>
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 (h b (Subtype.mk_lt_mk.1 hbotb))⟩
theorem isSimpleOrder_Ici_iff_isCoatom [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a : α} :
IsSimpleOrder (Ici a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
isSimpleOrder_iff_isCoatom_bot.trans <|
and_congr (not_congr Subtype.mk_eq_mk)
⟨fun h b ab => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 (h ⟨b, le_of_lt ab⟩ ab), fun h ⟨b, _⟩ hbotb =>
Subtype.mk_eq_mk.2 (h b (Subtype.mk_lt_mk.1 hbotb))⟩
end Set
namespace OrderEmbedding
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
theorem isAtom_of_map_bot_of_image [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] (f : β ↪o α) (hbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) {b : β}
(hb : IsAtom (f b)) : IsAtom b := by
simp only [← bot_covBy_iff] at hb ⊢
exact CovBy.of_image f (hbot.symm ▸ hb)
theorem isCoatom_of_map_top_of_image [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] (f : β ↪o α) (htop : f ⊤ = ⊤)
{b : β} (hb : IsCoatom (f b)) : IsCoatom b :=
f.dual.isAtom_of_map_bot_of_image htop hb
end OrderEmbedding
namespace GaloisInsertion
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
theorem isAtom_of_u_bot [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisInsertion l u) (hbot : u ⊥ = ⊥) {b : β} (hb : IsAtom (u b)) : IsAtom b :=
OrderEmbedding.isAtom_of_map_bot_of_image
⟨⟨u, gi.u_injective⟩, @GaloisInsertion.u_le_u_iff _ _ _ _ _ _ gi⟩ hbot hb
theorem isAtom_iff [OrderBot α] [IsAtomic α] [OrderBot β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisInsertion l u) (hbot : u ⊥ = ⊥) (h_atom : ∀ a, IsAtom a → u (l a) = a) (a : α) :
IsAtom (l a) ↔ IsAtom a := by
refine ⟨fun hla => ?_, fun ha => gi.isAtom_of_u_bot hbot ((h_atom a ha).symm ▸ ha)⟩
obtain ⟨a', ha', hab'⟩ :=
(eq_bot_or_exists_atom_le (u (l a))).resolve_left (hbot ▸ fun h => hla.1 (gi.u_injective h))
have :=
(hla.le_iff.mp <| (gi.l_u_eq (l a) ▸ gi.gc.monotone_l hab' : l a' ≤ l a)).resolve_left fun h =>
ha'.1 (hbot ▸ h_atom a' ha' ▸ congr_arg u h)
have haa' : a = a' :=
(ha'.le_iff.mp <|
(gi.gc.le_u_l a).trans_eq (h_atom a' ha' ▸ congr_arg u this.symm)).resolve_left
(mt (congr_arg l) (gi.gc.l_bot.symm ▸ hla.1))
exact haa'.symm ▸ ha'
theorem isAtom_iff' [OrderBot α] [IsAtomic α] [OrderBot β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisInsertion l u) (hbot : u ⊥ = ⊥) (h_atom : ∀ a, IsAtom a → u (l a) = a) (b : β) :
IsAtom (u b) ↔ IsAtom b := by rw [← gi.isAtom_iff hbot h_atom, gi.l_u_eq]
theorem isCoatom_of_image [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisInsertion l u) {b : β} (hb : IsCoatom (u b)) : IsCoatom b :=
OrderEmbedding.isCoatom_of_map_top_of_image
⟨⟨u, gi.u_injective⟩, @GaloisInsertion.u_le_u_iff _ _ _ _ _ _ gi⟩ gi.gc.u_top hb
theorem isCoatom_iff [OrderTop α] [IsCoatomic α] [OrderTop β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisInsertion l u) (h_coatom : ∀ a : α, IsCoatom a → u (l a) = a) (b : β) :
IsCoatom (u b) ↔ IsCoatom b := by
refine ⟨fun hb => gi.isCoatom_of_image hb, fun hb => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, hab⟩ :=
(eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom (u b)).resolve_left fun h =>
hb.1 <| (gi.gc.u_top ▸ gi.l_u_eq ⊤ : l ⊤ = ⊤) ▸ gi.l_u_eq b ▸ congr_arg l h
have : l a = b :=
(hb.le_iff.mp (gi.l_u_eq b ▸ gi.gc.monotone_l hab : b ≤ l a)).resolve_left fun hla =>
ha.1 (gi.gc.u_top ▸ h_coatom a ha ▸ congr_arg u hla)
exact this ▸ (h_coatom a ha).symm ▸ ha
end GaloisInsertion
namespace GaloisCoinsertion
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
theorem isCoatom_of_l_top [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisCoinsertion l u) (hbot : l ⊤ = ⊤) {a : α} (hb : IsCoatom (l a)) : IsCoatom a :=
gi.dual.isAtom_of_u_bot hbot hb.dual
theorem isCoatom_iff [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] [IsCoatomic β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisCoinsertion l u) (htop : l ⊤ = ⊤) (h_coatom : ∀ b, IsCoatom b → l (u b) = b)
(b : β) : IsCoatom (u b) ↔ IsCoatom b :=
gi.dual.isAtom_iff htop h_coatom b
theorem isCoatom_iff' [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] [IsCoatomic β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisCoinsertion l u) (htop : l ⊤ = ⊤) (h_coatom : ∀ b, IsCoatom b → l (u b) = b)
(a : α) : IsCoatom (l a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
gi.dual.isAtom_iff' htop h_coatom a
theorem isAtom_of_image [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisCoinsertion l u) {a : α} (hb : IsAtom (l a)) : IsAtom a :=
gi.dual.isCoatom_of_image hb.dual
theorem isAtom_iff [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] [IsAtomic β] {l : α → β} {u : β → α}
(gi : GaloisCoinsertion l u) (h_atom : ∀ b, IsAtom b → l (u b) = b) (a : α) :
IsAtom (l a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
gi.dual.isCoatom_iff h_atom a
end GaloisCoinsertion
namespace OrderIso
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
@[simp]
theorem isAtom_iff [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) : IsAtom (f a) ↔ IsAtom a :=
⟨f.toGaloisCoinsertion.isAtom_of_image, fun ha =>
f.toGaloisInsertion.isAtom_of_u_bot (map_bot f.symm) <| (f.symm_apply_apply a).symm ▸ ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCoatom_iff [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] (f : α ≃o β) (a : α) :
IsCoatom (f a) ↔ IsCoatom a :=
f.dual.isAtom_iff a
theorem isSimpleOrder_iff [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) :
IsSimpleOrder α ↔ IsSimpleOrder β := by
rw [isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top, isSimpleOrder_iff_isAtom_top, ← f.isAtom_iff ⊤,
f.map_top]
theorem isSimpleOrder [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] [h : IsSimpleOrder β] (f : α ≃o β) :
IsSimpleOrder α :=
f.isSimpleOrder_iff.mpr h
protected theorem isAtomic_iff [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] (f : α ≃o β) :
IsAtomic α ↔ IsAtomic β := by
simp only [isAtomic_iff, f.surjective.forall, f.surjective.exists, ← map_bot f, f.eq_iff_eq,
f.le_iff_le, f.isAtom_iff]
protected theorem isCoatomic_iff [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] (f : α ≃o β) :
IsCoatomic α ↔ IsCoatomic β := by
simp only [← isAtomic_dual_iff_isCoatomic, f.dual.isAtomic_iff]
end OrderIso
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α]
/-- An upper-modular lattice that is atomistic is strongly atomic.
Not an instance to prevent loops. -/
theorem Lattice.isStronglyAtomic [OrderBot α] [IsUpperModularLattice α] [IsAtomistic α] :
IsStronglyAtomic α where
exists_covBy_le_of_lt a b hab := by
obtain ⟨s, hsb, h⟩ := isLUB_atoms b
refine by_contra fun hcon ↦ hab.not_le <| (isLUB_le_iff hsb).2 fun x hx ↦ ?_
simp_rw [not_exists, and_comm (b := _ ≤ _), not_and] at hcon
specialize hcon (x ⊔ a) (sup_le (hsb.1 hx) hab.le)
obtain (hbot | h_inf) := (h x hx).bot_covBy.eq_or_eq (c := x ⊓ a) (by simp) (by simp)
· exact False.elim <| hcon <|
(hbot ▸ IsUpperModularLattice.covBy_sup_of_inf_covBy) (h x hx).bot_covBy
rwa [inf_eq_left] at h_inf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")] alias CompleteLattice.isStronglyAtomic :=
Lattice.isStronglyAtomic
/-- A lower-modular lattice that is coatomistic is strongly coatomic.
Not an instance to prevent loops. -/
theorem Lattice.isStronglyCoatomic [OrderTop α] [IsLowerModularLattice α]
| [IsCoatomistic α] : IsStronglyCoatomic α := by
rw [← isStronglyAtomic_dual_iff_is_stronglyCoatomic]
exact Lattice.isStronglyAtomic
| Mathlib/Order/Atoms.lean | 1,038 | 1,040 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Minchao Wu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Minchao Wu, Chris Hughes, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
/-!
# Minimum and maximum of lists
## Main definitions
The main definitions are `argmax`, `argmin`, `minimum` and `maximum` for lists.
`argmax f l` returns `some a`, where `a` of `l` that maximises `f a`. If there are `a b` such that
`f a = f b`, it returns whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list.
`argmax f [] = none`
`minimum l` returns a `WithTop α`, the smallest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊤` for
`[]`
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section ArgAux
variable (r : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel r] {l : List α} {o : Option α} {a : α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for `argmax` and `argmin`. -/
def argAux (a : Option α) (b : α) : Option α :=
Option.casesOn a (some b) fun c => if r b c then some b else some c
@[simp]
theorem foldl_argAux_eq_none : l.foldl (argAux r) o = none ↔ l = [] ∧ o = none :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp) fun tl hd => by
simp only [foldl_append, foldl_cons, argAux, foldl_nil, append_eq_nil_iff, and_false, false_and,
iff_false]
cases foldl (argAux r) o tl
· simp
· simp only [false_iff, not_and]
split_ifs <;> simp
private theorem foldl_argAux_mem (l) : ∀ a m : α, m ∈ foldl (argAux r) (some a) l → m ∈ a :: l :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp [eq_comm])
(by
intro tl hd ih a m
simp only [foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, argAux]
cases hf : foldl (argAux r) (some a) tl
· simp +contextual
· dsimp only
split_ifs
· simp +contextual
· -- `finish [ih _ _ hf]` closes this goal
simp only [List.mem_cons] at ih
rcases ih _ _ hf with rfl | H
· simp +contextual only [Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
find?, eq_comm, mem_cons, mem_append, mem_singleton, true_or, implies_true]
· simp +contextual [@eq_comm _ _ m, H])
@[simp]
theorem argAux_self (hr₀ : Irreflexive r) (a : α) : argAux r (some a) a = a :=
if_neg <| hr₀ _
theorem not_of_mem_foldl_argAux (hr₀ : Irreflexive r) (hr₁ : Transitive r) :
∀ {a m : α} {o : Option α}, a ∈ l → m ∈ foldl (argAux r) o l → ¬r a m := by
induction' l using List.reverseRecOn with tl a ih
· simp
intro b m o hb ho
rw [foldl_append, foldl_cons, foldl_nil, argAux] at ho
rcases hf : foldl (argAux r) o tl with - | c
· rw [hf] at ho
rw [foldl_argAux_eq_none] at hf
simp_all [hf.1, hf.2, hr₀ _]
rw [hf, Option.mem_def] at ho
dsimp only at ho
split_ifs at ho with hac <;> rcases mem_append.1 hb with h | h <;>
injection ho with ho <;> subst ho
· exact fun hba => ih h hf (hr₁ hba hac)
· simp_all [hr₀ _]
· exact ih h hf
· simp_all
end ArgAux
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] [DecidableLT β] {f : α → β} {l : List α} {a m : α}
/-- `argmax f l` returns `some a`, where `f a` is maximal among the elements of `l`, in the sense
that there is no `b ∈ l` with `f a < f b`. If `a`, `b` are such that `f a = f b`, it returns
whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list. `argmax f [] = none`. -/
def argmax (f : α → β) (l : List α) : Option α :=
l.foldl (argAux fun b c => f c < f b) none
/-- `argmin f l` returns `some a`, where `f a` is minimal among the elements of `l`, in the sense
that there is no `b ∈ l` with `f b < f a`. If `a`, `b` are such that `f a = f b`, it returns
whichever of `a` or `b` comes first in the list. `argmin f [] = none`. -/
def argmin (f : α → β) (l : List α) :=
l.foldl (argAux fun b c => f b < f c) none
@[simp]
theorem argmax_nil (f : α → β) : argmax f [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem argmin_nil (f : α → β) : argmin f [] = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem argmax_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : argmax f [a] = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem argmin_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : argmin f [a] = a :=
rfl
theorem not_lt_of_mem_argmax : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmax f l → ¬f m < f a :=
not_of_mem_foldl_argAux _ (fun x h => lt_irrefl (f x) h)
(fun _ _ z hxy hyz => lt_trans (a := f z) hyz hxy)
theorem not_lt_of_mem_argmin : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmin f l → ¬f a < f m :=
not_of_mem_foldl_argAux _ (fun x h => lt_irrefl (f x) h)
(fun x _ _ hxy hyz => lt_trans (a := f x) hxy hyz)
theorem argmax_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmax f (l ++ [a]) =
Option.casesOn (argmax f l) (some a) fun c => if f c < f a then some a else some c := by
rw [argmax, argmax]; simp [argAux]
theorem argmin_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmin f (l ++ [a]) =
Option.casesOn (argmin f l) (some a) fun c => if f a < f c then some a else some c :=
@argmax_concat _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem argmax_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmax f l → m ∈ l
| [], m => by simp
| hd :: tl, m => by simpa [argmax, argAux] using foldl_argAux_mem _ tl hd m
theorem argmin_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmin f l → m ∈ l :=
@argmax_mem _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem argmax_eq_none : l.argmax f = none ↔ l = [] := by simp [argmax]
@[simp]
theorem argmin_eq_none : l.argmin f = none ↔ l = [] :=
@argmax_eq_none _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : List α} {a m : α}
theorem le_of_mem_argmax : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmax f l → f a ≤ f m := fun ha hm =>
le_of_not_lt <| not_lt_of_mem_argmax ha hm
theorem le_of_mem_argmin : a ∈ l → m ∈ argmin f l → f m ≤ f a :=
@le_of_mem_argmax _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem argmax_cons (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmax f (a :: l) =
Option.casesOn (argmax f l) (some a) fun c => if f a < f c then some c else some a :=
List.reverseRecOn l rfl fun hd tl ih => by
rw [← cons_append, argmax_concat, ih, argmax_concat]
rcases h : argmax f hd with - | m
· simp [h]
dsimp
rw [← apply_ite, ← apply_ite]
dsimp
split_ifs <;> try rfl
· exact absurd (lt_trans ‹f a < f m› ‹_›) ‹_›
· cases (‹f a < f tl›.lt_or_lt _).elim ‹_› ‹_›
theorem argmin_cons (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
argmin f (a :: l) =
Option.casesOn (argmin f l) (some a) fun c => if f c < f a then some c else some a :=
@argmax_cons α βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem index_of_argmax :
∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmax f l → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l → f m ≤ f a → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a
| [], m, _, _, _, _ => by simp
| hd :: tl, m, hm, a, ha, ham => by
simp only [idxOf_cons, argmax_cons, Option.mem_def] at hm ⊢
cases h : argmax f tl
· rw [h] at hm
simp_all
rw [h] at hm
dsimp only at hm
simp only [cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
obtain ha | ha := ha <;> split_ifs at hm <;> injection hm with hm <;> subst hm
· cases not_le_of_lt ‹_› ‹_›
· rw [if_pos rfl]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· exact Nat.succ_le_succ (index_of_argmax h (by assumption) ham)
· exact ne_of_apply_ne f (lt_of_lt_of_le ‹_› ‹_›).ne
· exact ne_of_apply_ne _ ‹f hd < f _›.ne
· rw [if_pos rfl]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem index_of_argmin :
∀ {l : List α} {m : α}, m ∈ argmin f l → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l → f a ≤ f m → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
@index_of_argmax _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem mem_argmax_iff :
m ∈ argmax f l ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
⟨fun hm => ⟨argmax_mem hm, fun _ ha => le_of_mem_argmax ha hm, fun _ => index_of_argmax hm⟩,
by
rintro ⟨hml, ham, hma⟩
rcases harg : argmax f l with - | n
· simp_all
· have :=
_root_.le_antisymm (hma n (argmax_mem harg) (le_of_mem_argmax hml harg))
(index_of_argmax harg hml (ham _ (argmax_mem harg)))
rw [(idxOf_inj hml (argmax_mem harg)).1 this, Option.mem_def]⟩
theorem argmax_eq_some_iff :
argmax f l = some m ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
mem_argmax_iff
theorem mem_argmin_iff :
m ∈ argmin f l ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
@mem_argmax_iff _ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem argmin_eq_some_iff :
argmin f l = some m ↔
m ∈ l ∧ (∀ a ∈ l, f m ≤ f a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, f a ≤ f m → l.idxOf m ≤ l.idxOf a :=
mem_argmin_iff
end LinearOrder
section MaximumMinimum
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] {l : List α} {a m : α}
/-- `maximum l` returns a `WithBot α`, the largest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊥` for
`[]` -/
def maximum (l : List α) : WithBot α :=
argmax id l
/-- `minimum l` returns a `WithTop α`, the smallest element of `l` for nonempty lists, and `⊤` for
`[]` -/
def minimum (l : List α) : WithTop α :=
argmin id l
@[simp]
theorem maximum_nil : maximum ([] : List α) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem minimum_nil : minimum ([] : List α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem maximum_singleton (a : α) : maximum [a] = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem minimum_singleton (a : α) : minimum [a] = a :=
rfl
theorem maximum_mem {l : List α} {m : α} : (maximum l : WithTop α) = m → m ∈ l :=
argmax_mem
theorem minimum_mem {l : List α} {m : α} : (minimum l : WithBot α) = m → m ∈ l :=
argmin_mem
@[simp]
theorem maximum_eq_bot {l : List α} : l.maximum = ⊥ ↔ l = [] :=
argmax_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem minimum_eq_top {l : List α} : l.minimum = ⊤ ↔ l = [] :=
argmin_eq_none
theorem not_maximum_lt_of_mem : a ∈ l → (maximum l : WithBot α) = m → ¬m < a :=
not_lt_of_mem_argmax
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias not_lt_maximum_of_mem := not_maximum_lt_of_mem
theorem not_lt_minimum_of_mem : a ∈ l → (minimum l : WithTop α) = m → ¬a < m :=
not_lt_of_mem_argmin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias minimum_not_lt_of_mem := not_lt_minimum_of_mem
theorem not_maximum_lt_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : ¬maximum l < (a : WithBot α) := by
cases h : l.maximum <;> simp_all [not_maximum_lt_of_mem ha]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias not_lt_maximum_of_mem' := not_maximum_lt_of_mem'
theorem not_lt_minimum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : ¬(a : WithTop α) < minimum l := by
cases h : l.minimum <;> simp_all [not_lt_minimum_of_mem ha]
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {l : List α} {a m : α}
theorem maximum_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : maximum (l ++ [a]) = max (maximum l) a := by
simp only [maximum, argmax_concat, id]
cases argmax id l
· exact (max_eq_right bot_le).symm
· simp [WithBot.some_eq_coe, max_def_lt, WithBot.coe_lt_coe]
theorem le_maximum_of_mem : a ∈ l → (maximum l : WithBot α) = m → a ≤ m :=
le_of_mem_argmax
theorem minimum_le_of_mem : a ∈ l → (minimum l : WithTop α) = m → m ≤ a :=
le_of_mem_argmin
theorem le_maximum_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : (a : WithBot α) ≤ maximum l :=
le_of_not_lt <| not_maximum_lt_of_mem' ha
theorem minimum_le_of_mem' (ha : a ∈ l) : minimum l ≤ (a : WithTop α) :=
le_of_not_lt <| not_lt_minimum_of_mem' ha
theorem minimum_concat (a : α) (l : List α) : minimum (l ++ [a]) = min (minimum l) a :=
@maximum_concat αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem maximum_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : maximum (a :: l) = max ↑a (maximum l) :=
List.reverseRecOn l (by simp [@max_eq_left (WithBot α) _ _ _ bot_le]) fun tl hd ih => by
rw [← cons_append, maximum_concat, ih, maximum_concat, max_assoc]
theorem minimum_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : minimum (a :: l) = min ↑a (minimum l) :=
@maximum_cons αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma maximum_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : (l₁ ++ l₂).maximum = max l₁.maximum l₂.maximum := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => rw [maximum_cons, cons_append, maximum_cons, ih, ← max_assoc]
lemma minimum_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : (l₁ ++ l₂).minimum = min l₁.minimum l₂.minimum :=
@maximum_append αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem maximum_le_of_forall_le {b : WithBot α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, a ≤ b) : l.maximum ≤ b := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
simp only [maximum_cons, max_le_iff]
exact ⟨h a (by simp), ih fun a w => h a (mem_cons.mpr (Or.inr w))⟩
theorem le_minimum_of_forall_le {b : WithTop α} (h : ∀ a ∈ l, b ≤ a) : b ≤ l.minimum := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
simp only [minimum_cons, le_min_iff]
exact ⟨h a (by simp), ih fun a w => h a (mem_cons.mpr (Or.inr w))⟩
theorem maximum_mono {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : l₁.maximum ≤ l₂.maximum :=
maximum_le_of_forall_le fun _ ↦ (le_maximum_of_mem' <| h ·)
theorem minimum_anti {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : l₂.minimum ≤ l₁.minimum :=
@maximum_mono αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
theorem maximum_eq_coe_iff : maximum l = m ↔ m ∈ l ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, a ≤ m := by
rw [maximum, ← WithBot.some_eq_coe, argmax_eq_some_iff]
simp only [id_eq, and_congr_right_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
intro _ h a hal hma
rw [_root_.le_antisymm hma (h a hal)]
theorem minimum_eq_coe_iff : minimum l = m ↔ m ∈ l ∧ ∀ a ∈ l, m ≤ a :=
@maximum_eq_coe_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem coe_le_maximum_iff : a ≤ l.maximum ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ l ∧ a ≤ b := by
induction' l <;> simp [maximum_cons, *]
theorem minimum_le_coe_iff : l.minimum ≤ a ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ l ∧ b ≤ a := by
induction' l <;> simp [minimum_cons, *]
theorem maximum_ne_bot_of_ne_nil (h : l ≠ []) : l.maximum ≠ ⊥ :=
match l, h with | _ :: _, _ => by simp [maximum_cons]
theorem minimum_ne_top_of_ne_nil (h : l ≠ []) : l.minimum ≠ ⊤ :=
@maximum_ne_bot_of_ne_nil αᵒᵈ _ _ h
theorem maximum_ne_bot_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : l.maximum ≠ ⊥ :=
match l, h with | _ :: _, _ => by simp [maximum_cons]
theorem minimum_ne_top_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : l.minimum ≠ ⊤ :=
maximum_ne_bot_of_length_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) h
/-- The maximum value in a non-empty `List`. -/
def maximum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : α :=
WithBot.unbot l.maximum (maximum_ne_bot_of_length_pos h)
/-- The minimum value in a non-empty `List`. -/
def minimum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) : α :=
maximum_of_length_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
lemma coe_maximum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) :
(l.maximum_of_length_pos h : α) = l.maximum :=
WithBot.coe_unbot _ _
@[simp]
lemma coe_minimum_of_length_pos (h : 0 < l.length) :
(l.minimum_of_length_pos h : α) = l.minimum :=
WithTop.coe_untop _ _
@[simp]
theorem le_maximum_of_length_pos_iff {b : α} (h : 0 < l.length) :
b ≤ maximum_of_length_pos h ↔ b ≤ l.maximum :=
WithBot.le_unbot_iff _
@[simp]
theorem minimum_of_length_pos_le_iff {b : α} (h : 0 < l.length) :
minimum_of_length_pos h ≤ b ↔ l.minimum ≤ b :=
WithTop.untop_le_iff _
theorem maximum_of_length_pos_mem (h : 0 < l.length) :
maximum_of_length_pos h ∈ l := by
apply maximum_mem
simp only [coe_maximum_of_length_pos]
theorem minimum_of_length_pos_mem (h : 0 < l.length) :
minimum_of_length_pos h ∈ l :=
maximum_of_length_pos_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem le_maximum_of_length_pos_of_mem (h : a ∈ l) (w : 0 < l.length) :
a ≤ l.maximum_of_length_pos w := by
simp only [le_maximum_of_length_pos_iff]
exact le_maximum_of_mem' h
theorem minimum_of_length_pos_le_of_mem (h : a ∈ l) (w : 0 < l.length) :
l.minimum_of_length_pos w ≤ a :=
le_maximum_of_length_pos_of_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) h w
theorem getElem_le_maximum_of_length_pos {i : ℕ} (w : i < l.length) (h := (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt w)) :
l[i] ≤ l.maximum_of_length_pos h := by
apply le_maximum_of_length_pos_of_mem
exact getElem_mem _
theorem minimum_of_length_pos_le_getElem {i : ℕ} (w : i < l.length) (h := (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt w)) :
l.minimum_of_length_pos h ≤ l[i] :=
getElem_le_maximum_of_length_pos (α := αᵒᵈ) w
lemma getD_max?_eq_unbotD_maximum (l : List α) (d : α) : l.max?.getD d = l.maximum.unbotD d := by
cases hy : l.maximum with
| bot => simp [List.maximum_eq_bot.mp hy]
| coe y =>
rw [List.maximum_eq_coe_iff] at hy
simp only [WithBot.unbotD_coe]
cases hz : l.max? with
| none => simp [List.max?_eq_none_iff.mp hz] at hy
| | some z =>
have : Std.Antisymm (α := α) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun _ _ => _root_.le_antisymm⟩
rw [List.max?_eq_some_iff] at hz
· rw [Option.getD_some]
| Mathlib/Data/List/MinMax.lean | 459 | 462 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Order
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
/-!
# Fixed point construction on complete lattices
This file sets up the basic theory of fixed points of a monotone function in a complete lattice.
## Main definitions
* `OrderHom.lfp`: The least fixed point of a bundled monotone function.
* `OrderHom.gfp`: The greatest fixed point of a bundled monotone function.
* `OrderHom.prevFixed`: The greatest fixed point of a bundled monotone function smaller than or
equal to a given element.
* `OrderHom.nextFixed`: The least fixed point of a bundled monotone function greater than or
equal to a given element.
* `fixedPoints.completeLattice`: The Knaster-Tarski theorem: fixed points of a monotone
self-map of a complete lattice form themselves a complete lattice.
## Tags
fixed point, complete lattice, monotone function
-/
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function (fixedPoints IsFixedPt)
namespace OrderHom
section Basic
variable [CompleteLattice α] (f : α →o α)
/-- Least fixed point of a monotone function -/
def lfp : (α →o α) →o α where
toFun f := sInf { a | f a ≤ a }
monotone' _ _ hle := sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => (hle a).trans ha
/-- Greatest fixed point of a monotone function -/
def gfp : (α →o α) →o α where
toFun f := sSup { a | a ≤ f a }
monotone' _ _ hle := sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => le_trans ha (hle a)
theorem lfp_le {a : α} (h : f a ≤ a) : f.lfp ≤ a :=
sInf_le h
theorem lfp_le_fixed {a : α} (h : f a = a) : f.lfp ≤ a :=
f.lfp_le h.le
theorem le_lfp {a : α} (h : ∀ b, f b ≤ b → a ≤ b) : a ≤ f.lfp :=
le_sInf h
theorem map_le_lfp {a : α} (ha : a ≤ f.lfp) : f a ≤ f.lfp :=
f.le_lfp fun _ hb => (f.mono <| le_sInf_iff.1 ha _ hb).trans hb
@[simp]
theorem map_lfp : f f.lfp = f.lfp :=
have h : f f.lfp ≤ f.lfp := f.map_le_lfp le_rfl
h.antisymm <| f.lfp_le <| f.mono h
theorem isFixedPt_lfp : IsFixedPt f f.lfp :=
f.map_lfp
theorem lfp_le_map {a : α} (ha : f.lfp ≤ a) : f.lfp ≤ f a :=
calc
f.lfp = f f.lfp := f.map_lfp.symm
_ ≤ f a := f.mono ha
theorem isLeast_lfp_le : IsLeast { a | f a ≤ a } f.lfp :=
⟨f.map_lfp.le, fun _ => f.lfp_le⟩
theorem isLeast_lfp : IsLeast (fixedPoints f) f.lfp :=
⟨f.isFixedPt_lfp, fun _ => f.lfp_le_fixed⟩
theorem lfp_induction {p : α → Prop} (step : ∀ a, p a → a ≤ f.lfp → p (f a))
(hSup : ∀ s, (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → p (sSup s)) : p f.lfp := by
set s := { a | a ≤ f.lfp ∧ p a }
specialize hSup s fun a => And.right
suffices sSup s = f.lfp from this ▸ hSup
have h : sSup s ≤ f.lfp := sSup_le fun b => And.left
have hmem : f (sSup s) ∈ s := ⟨f.map_le_lfp h, step _ hSup h⟩
exact h.antisymm (f.lfp_le <| le_sSup hmem)
theorem le_gfp {a : α} (h : a ≤ f a) : a ≤ f.gfp :=
le_sSup h
theorem gfp_le {a : α} (h : ∀ b, b ≤ f b → b ≤ a) : f.gfp ≤ a :=
sSup_le h
| theorem isFixedPt_gfp : IsFixedPt f f.gfp :=
f.dual.isFixedPt_lfp
@[simp]
theorem map_gfp : f f.gfp = f.gfp :=
f.dual.map_lfp
theorem map_le_gfp {a : α} (ha : a ≤ f.gfp) : f a ≤ f.gfp :=
| Mathlib/Order/FixedPoints.lean | 100 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Theodore Hwa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Junyan Xu, Theodore Hwa
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Hydra
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Basic
/-!
### Surreal multiplication
In this file, we show that multiplication of surreal numbers is well-defined, and thus the
surreal numbers form a linear ordered commutative ring.
An inductive argument proves the following three main theorems:
* P1: being numeric is closed under multiplication,
* P2: multiplying a numeric pregame by equivalent numeric pregames results in equivalent pregames,
* P3: the product of two positive numeric pregames is positive (`mul_pos`).
This is Theorem 8 in [Conway2001], or Theorem 3.8 in [SchleicherStoll]. P1 allows us to define
multiplication as an operation on numeric pregames, P2 says that this is well-defined as an
operation on the quotient by `PGame.Equiv`, namely the surreal numbers, and P3 is an axiom that
needs to be satisfied for the surreals to be a `OrderedRing`.
We follow the proof in [SchleicherStoll], except that we use the well-foundedness of
the hydra relation `CutExpand` on `Multiset PGame` instead of the argument based
on a depth function in the paper.
In the argument, P3 is stated with four variables `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `y₂` satisfying `x₁ < x₂` and
`y₁ < y₂`, and says that `x₁ * y₂ + x₂ * x₁ < x₁ * y₁ + x₂ * y₂`, which is equivalent to
`0 < x₂ - x₁ → 0 < y₂ - y₁ → 0 < (x₂ - x₁) * (y₂ - y₁)`, i.e.
`@mul_pos PGame _ (x₂ - x₁) (y₂ - y₁)`. It has to be stated in this form and not in terms of
`mul_pos` because we need to show P1, P2 and (a specialized form of) P3 simultaneously, and
for example `P1 x y` will be deduced from P3 with variables taking values simpler than `x` or `y`
(among other induction hypotheses), but if you subtract two pregames simpler than `x` or `y`,
the result may no longer be simpler.
The specialized version of P3 is called P4, which takes only three arguments `x₁`, `x₂`, `y` and
requires that `y₂ = y` or `-y` and that `y₁` is a left option of `y₂`. After P1, P2 and P4 are
shown, a further inductive argument (this time using the `GameAdd` relation) proves P3 in full.
Implementation strategy of the inductive argument: we
* extract specialized versions (`IH1`, `IH2`, `IH3`, `IH4` and `IH24`) of the induction hypothesis
that are easier to apply (taking `IsOption` arguments directly), and
* show they are invariant under certain symmetries (permutation and negation of arguments) and that
the induction hypothesis indeed implies the specialized versions.
* utilize the symmetries to minimize calculation.
The whole proof features a clear separation into lemmas of different roles:
* verification of symmetry properties of P and IH (`P3_comm`, `ih1_neg_left`, etc.),
* calculations that connect P1, P2, P3, and inequalities between the product of
two surreals and its options (`mulOption_lt_iff_P1`, etc.),
* specializations of the induction hypothesis
(`numeric_option_mul`, `ih1`, `ih1_swap`, `ih₁₂`, `ih4`, etc.),
* application of specialized induction hypothesis
(`P1_of_ih`, `mul_right_le_of_equiv`, `P3_of_lt`, etc.).
## References
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][Conway2001]
* [Schleicher, Stoll, *An introduction to Conway's games and numbers*][SchleicherStoll]
-/
universe u
open SetTheory Game PGame WellFounded
namespace Surreal.Multiplication
/-- The nontrivial part of P1 in [SchleicherStoll] says that the left options of `x * y` are less
than the right options, and this is the general form of these statements. -/
def P1 (x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ : PGame) :=
⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₂⟧ - ⟦x₁ * y₂⟧ < ⟦x₃ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₃⟧ - (⟦x₃ * y₃⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P2, without numericity assumptions. -/
def P2 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) := x₁ ≈ x₂ → ⟦x₁ * y⟧ = (⟦x₂ * y⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P3, without the `x₁ < x₂` and `y₁ < y₂` assumptions. -/
def P3 (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : PGame) := ⟦x₁ * y₂⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₁⟧ < ⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ + (⟦x₂ * y₂⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P4, without numericity assumptions. In the references, the second part of the
conjunction is stated as `∀ j, P3 x₁ x₂ y (y.moveRight j)`, which is equivalent to our statement
by `P3_comm` and `P3_neg`. We choose to state everything in terms of left options for uniform
treatment. -/
def P4 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) :=
x₁ < x₂ → (∀ i, P3 x₁ x₂ (y.moveLeft i) y) ∧ ∀ j, P3 x₁ x₂ ((-y).moveLeft j) (-y)
/-- The conjunction of P2 and P4. -/
def P24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop := P2 x₁ x₂ y ∧ P4 x₁ x₂ y
variable {x x₁ x₂ x₃ x' y y₁ y₂ y₃ y' : PGame.{u}}
/-! #### Symmetry properties of P1, P2, P3, and P4 -/
lemma P3_comm : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ ↔ P3 y₁ y₂ x₁ x₂ := by
rw [P3, P3, add_comm]
congr! 2 <;> rw [quot_mul_comm]
lemma P3.trans (h₁ : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (h₂ : P3 x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂) : P3 x₁ x₃ y₁ y₂ := by
rw [P3] at h₁ h₂
rw [P3, ← add_lt_add_iff_left (⟦x₂ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₂⟧)]
convert add_lt_add h₁ h₂ using 1 <;> abel
lemma P3_neg : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ ↔ P3 (-x₂) (-x₁) y₁ y₂ := by
simp_rw [P3, quot_neg_mul]
rw [← _root_.neg_lt_neg_iff]
abel_nf
lemma P2_neg_left : P2 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P2 (-x₂) (-x₁) y := by
rw [P2, P2]
constructor
· rw [quot_neg_mul, quot_neg_mul, eq_comm, neg_inj, neg_equiv_neg_iff, PGame.equiv_comm]
exact (· ·)
· rw [PGame.equiv_comm, neg_equiv_neg_iff, quot_neg_mul, quot_neg_mul, neg_inj, eq_comm]
exact (· ·)
lemma P2_neg_right : P2 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P2 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
rw [P2, P2, quot_mul_neg, quot_mul_neg, neg_inj]
lemma P4_neg_left : P4 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P4 (-x₂) (-x₁) y := by
simp_rw [P4, PGame.neg_lt_neg_iff, moveLeft_neg, ← P3_neg]
lemma P4_neg_right : P4 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P4 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
rw [P4, P4, neg_neg, and_comm]
lemma P24_neg_left : P24 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P24 (-x₂) (-x₁) y := by rw [P24, P24, P2_neg_left, P4_neg_left]
lemma P24_neg_right : P24 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P24 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by rw [P24, P24, P2_neg_right, P4_neg_right]
/-! #### Explicit calculations necessary for the main proof -/
lemma mulOption_lt_iff_P1 {i j k l} :
(⟦mulOption x y i k⟧ : Game) < -⟦mulOption x (-y) j l⟧ ↔
P1 (x.moveLeft i) x (x.moveLeft j) y (y.moveLeft k) (-(-y).moveLeft l) := by
dsimp only [P1, mulOption, quot_sub, quot_add]
simp_rw [neg_sub', neg_add, quot_mul_neg, neg_neg]
lemma mulOption_lt_mul_iff_P3 {i j} :
⟦mulOption x y i j⟧ < (⟦x * y⟧ : Game) ↔ P3 (x.moveLeft i) x (y.moveLeft j) y := by
dsimp only [mulOption, quot_sub, quot_add]
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add'
lemma P1_of_eq (he : x₁ ≈ x₃) (h₁ : P2 x₁ x₃ y₁) (h₃ : P2 x₁ x₃ y₃) (h3 : P3 x₁ x₂ y₂ y₃) :
P1 x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ := by
rw [P1, ← h₁ he, ← h₃ he, sub_lt_sub_iff]
convert add_lt_add_left h3 ⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ using 1 <;> abel
lemma P1_of_lt (h₁ : P3 x₃ x₂ y₂ y₃) (h₂ : P3 x₁ x₃ y₂ y₁) : P1 x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ := by
rw [P1, sub_lt_sub_iff, ← add_lt_add_iff_left ⟦x₃ * y₂⟧]
convert add_lt_add h₁ h₂ using 1 <;> abel
/-- The type of lists of arguments for P1, P2, and P4. -/
inductive Args : Type (u + 1)
| P1 (x y : PGame.{u}) : Args
| P24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame.{u}) : Args
/-- The multiset associated to a list of arguments. -/
def Args.toMultiset : Args → Multiset PGame
| (Args.P1 x y) => {x, y}
| (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) => {x₁, x₂, y}
/-- A list of arguments is numeric if all the arguments are. -/
def Args.Numeric (a : Args) := ∀ x ∈ a.toMultiset, SetTheory.PGame.Numeric x
lemma Args.numeric_P1 {x y} : (Args.P1 x y).Numeric ↔ x.Numeric ∧ y.Numeric := by
simp [Args.Numeric, Args.toMultiset]
lemma Args.numeric_P24 {x₁ x₂ y} :
(Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y).Numeric ↔ x₁.Numeric ∧ x₂.Numeric ∧ y.Numeric := by
simp [Args.Numeric, Args.toMultiset]
open Relation
/-- The relation specifying when a list of (pregame) arguments is considered simpler than another:
`ArgsRel a₁ a₂` is true if `a₁`, considered as a multiset, can be obtained from `a₂` by
repeatedly removing a pregame from `a₂` and adding back one or two options of the pregame. -/
def ArgsRel := InvImage (TransGen <| CutExpand IsOption) Args.toMultiset
/-- `ArgsRel` is well-founded. -/
theorem argsRel_wf : WellFounded ArgsRel := InvImage.wf _ wf_isOption.cutExpand.transGen
/-- The statement that we will show by induction using the well-founded relation `ArgsRel`. -/
def P124 : Args → Prop
| (Args.P1 x y) => Numeric (x * y)
| (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) => P24 x₁ x₂ y
/-- The property that all arguments are numeric is leftward-closed under `ArgsRel`. -/
lemma ArgsRel.numeric_closed {a' a} : ArgsRel a' a → a.Numeric → a'.Numeric :=
TransGen.closed' <| @cutExpand_closed _ IsOption ⟨wf_isOption.isIrrefl.1⟩ _ Numeric.isOption
/-- A specialized induction hypothesis used to prove P1. -/
def IH1 (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x₁ x₂ y'⦄, IsOption x₁ x → IsOption x₂ x → (y' = y ∨ IsOption y' y) → P24 x₁ x₂ y'
/-! #### Symmetry properties of `IH1` -/
lemma ih1_neg_left : IH1 x y → IH1 (-x) y :=
fun h x₁ x₂ y' h₁ h₂ hy ↦ by
rw [isOption_neg] at h₁ h₂
exact P24_neg_left.2 (h h₂ h₁ hy)
lemma ih1_neg_right : IH1 x y → IH1 x (-y) :=
fun h x₁ x₂ y' ↦ by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, isOption_neg, P24_neg_right]
apply h
/-! #### Specialize `ih` to obtain specialized induction hypotheses for P1 -/
lemma numeric_option_mul (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (h : IsOption x' x) :
(x' * y).Numeric :=
ih (Args.P1 x' y) (TransGen.single <| cutExpand_pair_left h)
lemma numeric_mul_option (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (h : IsOption y' y) :
(x * y').Numeric :=
ih (Args.P1 x y') (TransGen.single <| cutExpand_pair_right h)
lemma numeric_option_mul_option (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (hx : IsOption x' x)
(hy : IsOption y' y) : (x' * y').Numeric :=
ih (Args.P1 x' y') ((TransGen.single <| cutExpand_pair_right hy).tail <| cutExpand_pair_left hx)
lemma ih1 (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) : IH1 x y := by
rintro x₁ x₂ y' h₁ h₂ (rfl|hy) <;> apply ih (Args.P24 _ _ _)
on_goal 2 => refine TransGen.tail ?_ (cutExpand_pair_right hy)
all_goals exact TransGen.single (cutExpand_double_left h₁ h₂)
lemma ih1_swap (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) : IH1 y x := ih1 <| by
simp_rw [ArgsRel, InvImage, Args.toMultiset, Multiset.pair_comm] at ih ⊢
exact ih
lemma P3_of_ih (hy : Numeric y) (ihyx : IH1 y x) (i k l) :
P3 (x.moveLeft i) x (y.moveLeft k) (-(-y).moveLeft l) :=
P3_comm.2 <| ((ihyx (IsOption.moveLeft k) (isOption_neg.1 <| .moveLeft l) <| Or.inl rfl).2
(by rw [moveLeft_neg, neg_neg]; apply hy.left_lt_right)).1 i
lemma P24_of_ih (ihxy : IH1 x y) (i j) : P24 (x.moveLeft i) (x.moveLeft j) y :=
ihxy (IsOption.moveLeft i) (IsOption.moveLeft j) (Or.inl rfl)
section
lemma mulOption_lt_of_lt (hy : y.Numeric) (ihxy : IH1 x y) (ihyx : IH1 y x) (i j k l)
(h : x.moveLeft i < x.moveLeft j) :
(⟦mulOption x y i k⟧ : Game) < -⟦mulOption x (-y) j l⟧ :=
mulOption_lt_iff_P1.2 <| P1_of_lt (P3_of_ih hy ihyx j k l) <| ((P24_of_ih ihxy i j).2 h).1 k
lemma mulOption_lt (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) (ihxy : IH1 x y) (ihyx : IH1 y x) (i j k l) :
(⟦mulOption x y i k⟧ : Game) < -⟦mulOption x (-y) j l⟧ := by
obtain (h|h|h) := lt_or_equiv_or_gt (hx.moveLeft i) (hx.moveLeft j)
· exact mulOption_lt_of_lt hy ihxy ihyx i j k l h
· have ml := @IsOption.moveLeft
exact mulOption_lt_iff_P1.2 (P1_of_eq h (P24_of_ih ihxy i j).1
(ihxy (ml i) (ml j) <| Or.inr <| isOption_neg.1 <| ml l).1 <| P3_of_ih hy ihyx i k l)
· rw [mulOption_neg_neg, lt_neg]
exact mulOption_lt_of_lt hy.neg (ih1_neg_right ihxy) (ih1_neg_left ihyx) j i l _ h
end
/-- P1 follows from the induction hypothesis. -/
theorem P1_of_ih (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) :
(x * y).Numeric := by
have ihxy := ih1 ih
have ihyx := ih1_swap ih
have ihxyn := ih1_neg_left (ih1_neg_right ihxy)
have ihyxn := ih1_neg_left (ih1_neg_right ihyx)
refine numeric_def.mpr ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [lt_iff_game_lt]
intro i
rw [rightMoves_mul_iff]
constructor <;> (intro j l; revert i; rw [leftMoves_mul_iff (_ > ·)]; constructor <;> intro i k)
· apply mulOption_lt hx hy ihxy ihyx
· simp_rw [← mulOption_symm (-y), mulOption_neg_neg x]
apply mulOption_lt hy.neg hx.neg ihyxn ihxyn
· simp only [← mulOption_symm y]
apply mulOption_lt hy hx ihyx ihxy
· rw [mulOption_neg_neg y]
apply mulOption_lt hx.neg hy.neg ihxyn ihyxn
all_goals
cases x; cases y
rintro (⟨i,j⟩|⟨i,j⟩) <;>
refine ((numeric_option_mul ih ?_).add <| numeric_mul_option ih ?_).sub
(numeric_option_mul_option ih ?_ ?_) <;>
solve_by_elim [IsOption.mk_left, IsOption.mk_right]
/-- A specialized induction hypothesis used to prove P2 and P4. -/
def IH24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, (IsOption z x₁ → P24 z x₂ y) ∧ (IsOption z x₂ → P24 x₁ z y) ∧ (IsOption z y → P24 x₁ x₂ z)
/-- A specialized induction hypothesis used to prove P4. -/
def IH4 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃z w⦄, IsOption w y → (IsOption z x₁ → P2 z x₂ w) ∧ (IsOption z x₂ → P2 x₁ z w)
/-! #### Specialize `ih'` to obtain specialized induction hypotheses for P2 and P4 -/
lemma ih₁₂ (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) : IH24 x₁ x₂ y := by
rw [IH24]
refine fun z ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
refine fun h ↦ ih' (Args.P24 _ _ _) (TransGen.single ?_)
· exact (cutExpand_add_right {y}).2 (cutExpand_pair_left h)
· exact (cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 (cutExpand_pair_left h)
· exact (cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 (cutExpand_pair_right h)
lemma ih₂₁ (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) : IH24 x₂ x₁ y := ih₁₂ <| by
simp_rw [ArgsRel, InvImage, Args.toMultiset, Multiset.pair_comm] at ih' ⊢
suffices {x₁, y, x₂} = {x₂, y, x₁} by rwa [← this]
dsimp only [Multiset.insert_eq_cons, ← Multiset.singleton_add] at ih' ⊢
abel
lemma ih4 (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) : IH4 x₁ x₂ y := by
refine fun z w h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩
all_goals
intro h'
apply (ih' (Args.P24 _ _ _) <| (TransGen.single _).tail <|
(cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 <| cutExpand_pair_right h).1
try exact (cutExpand_add_right {w}).2 <| cutExpand_pair_left h'
try exact (cutExpand_add_right {w}).2 <| cutExpand_pair_right h'
lemma numeric_of_ih (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) :
(x₁ * y).Numeric ∧ (x₂ * y).Numeric := by
constructor <;> refine ih' (Args.P1 _ _) (TransGen.single ?_)
· exact (cutExpand_add_right {y}).2 <| (cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 cutExpand_zero
· exact (cutExpand_add_right {x₂, y}).2 cutExpand_zero
/-- Symmetry properties of `IH24`. -/
lemma ih24_neg : IH24 x₁ x₂ y → IH24 (-x₂) (-x₁) y ∧ IH24 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
simp_rw [IH24, ← P24_neg_right, isOption_neg]
refine fun h ↦ ⟨fun z ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩,
fun z ↦ ⟨(@h z).1, (@h z).2.1, P24_neg_right.2 ∘ (@h <| -z).2.2⟩⟩
all_goals
rw [P24_neg_left]
simp only [neg_neg]
first | exact (@h <| -z).2.1 | exact (@h <| -z).1 | exact (@h z).2.2
/-- Symmetry properties of `IH4`. -/
lemma ih4_neg : IH4 x₁ x₂ y → IH4 (-x₂) (-x₁) y ∧ IH4 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
simp_rw [IH4, isOption_neg]
refine fun h ↦ ⟨fun z w h' ↦ ?_, fun z w h' ↦ ?_⟩
· convert (h h').symm using 2 <;> rw [P2_neg_left, neg_neg]
· convert h h' using 2 <;> rw [P2_neg_right]
lemma mulOption_lt_mul_of_equiv (hn : x₁.Numeric) (h : IH24 x₁ x₂ y) (he : x₁ ≈ x₂) (i j) :
⟦mulOption x₁ y i j⟧ < (⟦x₂ * y⟧ : Game) := by
convert sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 ((((@h _).1 <| IsOption.moveLeft i).2 _).1 j) using 1
· rw [← ((@h _).2.2 <| IsOption.moveLeft j).1 he]
rfl
· rw [← lt_congr_right he]
apply hn.moveLeft_lt
/-- P2 follows from specialized induction hypotheses (one half of the equality). -/
theorem mul_right_le_of_equiv (h₁ : x₁.Numeric) (h₂ : x₂.Numeric)
(h₁₂ : IH24 x₁ x₂ y) (h₂₁ : IH24 x₂ x₁ y) (he : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ * y ≤ x₂ * y := by
have he' := neg_equiv_neg_iff.2 he
apply PGame.le_of_forall_lt <;> simp_rw [lt_iff_game_lt]
· rw [leftMoves_mul_iff (_ > ·)]
refine ⟨mulOption_lt_mul_of_equiv h₁ h₁₂ he, ?_⟩
rw [← quot_neg_mul_neg]
exact mulOption_lt_mul_of_equiv h₁.neg (ih24_neg <| (ih24_neg h₂₁).1).2 he'
· rw [rightMoves_mul_iff]
constructor <;> intros <;> rw [lt_neg]
· rw [← quot_mul_neg]
apply mulOption_lt_mul_of_equiv h₂ (ih24_neg h₂₁).2 (symm he)
· rw [← quot_neg_mul]
apply mulOption_lt_mul_of_equiv h₂.neg (ih24_neg h₁₂).1 (symm he')
/-- The statement that all left options of `x * y` of the first kind are less than itself. -/
def MulOptionsLTMul (x y : PGame) : Prop := ∀ ⦃i j⦄, ⟦mulOption x y i j⟧ < (⟦x * y⟧ : Game)
/-- That the left options of `x * y` are less than itself and the right options are greater, which
is part of the condition that `x * y` is numeric, is equivalent to the conjunction of various
`MulOptionsLTMul` statements for `x`, `y` and their negations. We only show the forward
direction. -/
lemma mulOptionsLTMul_of_numeric (hn : (x * y).Numeric) :
(MulOptionsLTMul x y ∧ MulOptionsLTMul (-x) (-y)) ∧
(MulOptionsLTMul x (-y) ∧ MulOptionsLTMul (-x) y) := by
constructor
· have h := hn.moveLeft_lt
simp_rw [lt_iff_game_lt] at h
convert (leftMoves_mul_iff <| GT.gt _).1 h
rw [← quot_neg_mul_neg]
rfl
· have h := hn.lt_moveRight
simp_rw [lt_iff_game_lt, rightMoves_mul_iff] at h
refine h.imp ?_ ?_ <;> refine forall₂_imp fun a b ↦ ?_
all_goals
rw [lt_neg]
first | rw [quot_mul_neg] | rw [quot_neg_mul]
exact id
/-- A condition just enough to deduce P3, which will always be used with `x'` being a left
option of `x₂`. When `y₁` is a left option of `y₂`, it can be deduced from induction hypotheses
`IH24 x₁ x₂ y₂`, `IH4 x₁ x₂ y₂`, and `(x₂ * y₂).Numeric` (`ih3_of_ih`); when `y₁` is
not necessarily an option of `y₂`, it follows from the induction hypothesis for P3 (with `x₂`
replaced by a left option `x'`) after the `main` theorem (P124) is established, and is used to
prove P3 in full (`P3_of_lt_of_lt`). -/
def IH3 (x₁ x' x₂ y₁ y₂ : PGame) : Prop :=
P2 x₁ x' y₁ ∧ P2 x₁ x' y₂ ∧ P3 x' x₂ y₁ y₂ ∧ (x₁ < x' → P3 x₁ x' y₁ y₂)
lemma ih3_of_ih (h24 : IH24 x₁ x₂ y) (h4 : IH4 x₁ x₂ y) (hl : MulOptionsLTMul x₂ y) (i j) :
IH3 x₁ (x₂.moveLeft i) x₂ (y.moveLeft j) y :=
have ml := @IsOption.moveLeft
have h24 := (@h24 _).2.1 (ml i)
⟨(h4 <| ml j).2 (ml i), h24.1, mulOption_lt_mul_iff_P3.1 (@hl i j), fun l ↦ (h24.2 l).1 _⟩
lemma P3_of_le_left {y₁ y₂} (i) (h : IH3 x₁ (x₂.moveLeft i) x₂ y₁ y₂) (hl : x₁ ≤ x₂.moveLeft i) :
P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ := by
obtain (hl|he) := lt_or_equiv_of_le hl
· exact (h.2.2.2 hl).trans h.2.2.1
· rw [P3, h.1 he, h.2.1 he]
exact h.2.2.1
/-- P3 follows from `IH3` (so P4 (with `y₁` a left option of `y₂`) follows from the induction
hypothesis). -/
theorem P3_of_lt {y₁ y₂} (h : ∀ i, IH3 x₁ (x₂.moveLeft i) x₂ y₁ y₂)
(hs : ∀ i, IH3 (-x₂) ((-x₁).moveLeft i) (-x₁) y₁ y₂) (hl : x₁ < x₂) :
P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ := by
obtain (⟨i,hi⟩|⟨i,hi⟩) := lf_iff_exists_le.1 (lf_of_lt hl)
· exact P3_of_le_left i (h i) hi
· apply P3_neg.2 <| P3_of_le_left _ (hs (toLeftMovesNeg i)) _
simpa
/-- The main chunk of Theorem 8 in [Conway2001] / Theorem 3.8 in [SchleicherStoll]. -/
theorem main (a : Args) : a.Numeric → P124 a := by
apply argsRel_wf.induction a
intros a ih ha
replace ih : ∀ a', ArgsRel a' a → P124 a' := fun a' hr ↦ ih a' hr (hr.numeric_closed ha)
cases a with
/- P1 -/
| P1 x y =>
rw [Args.numeric_P1] at ha
exact P1_of_ih ih ha.1 ha.2
| P24 x₁ x₂ y =>
have h₁₂ := ih₁₂ ih
have h₂₁ := ih₂₁ ih
have h4 := ih4 ih
obtain ⟨h₁₂x, h₁₂y⟩ := ih24_neg h₁₂
obtain ⟨h4x, h4y⟩ := ih4_neg h4
refine ⟨fun he ↦ Quotient.sound ?_, fun hl ↦ ?_⟩
· /- P2 -/
rw [Args.numeric_P24] at ha
exact ⟨mul_right_le_of_equiv ha.1 ha.2.1 h₁₂ h₂₁ he,
mul_right_le_of_equiv ha.2.1 ha.1 h₂₁ h₁₂ (symm he)⟩
· /- P4 -/
obtain ⟨hn₁, hn₂⟩ := numeric_of_ih ih
obtain ⟨⟨h₁, -⟩, h₂, -⟩ := mulOptionsLTMul_of_numeric hn₂
obtain ⟨⟨-, h₃⟩, -, h₄⟩ := mulOptionsLTMul_of_numeric hn₁
constructor <;> intro <;> refine P3_of_lt ?_ ?_ hl <;> intro <;> apply ih3_of_ih
any_goals assumption
exacts [(ih24_neg h₁₂y).1, (ih4_neg h4y).1]
end Surreal.Multiplication
namespace SetTheory.PGame
open Surreal.Multiplication
variable {x x₁ x₂ y y₁ y₂ : PGame.{u}}
theorem Numeric.mul (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) : Numeric (x * y) :=
main _ <| Args.numeric_P1.mpr ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem P24 (hx₁ : x₁.Numeric) (hx₂ : x₂.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) : P24 x₁ x₂ y :=
main _ <| Args.numeric_P24.mpr ⟨hx₁, hx₂, hy⟩
theorem Equiv.mul_congr_left (hx₁ : x₁.Numeric) (hx₂ : x₂.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric)
(he : x₁ ≈ x₂) : x₁ * y ≈ x₂ * y :=
equiv_iff_game_eq.2 <| (P24 hx₁ hx₂ hy).1 he
theorem Equiv.mul_congr_right (hx : x.Numeric) (hy₁ : y₁.Numeric) (hy₂ : y₂.Numeric)
(he : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x * y₁ ≈ x * y₂ :=
.trans (mul_comm_equiv _ _) <| .trans (mul_congr_left hy₁ hy₂ hx he) (mul_comm_equiv _ _)
theorem Equiv.mul_congr (hx₁ : x₁.Numeric) (hx₂ : x₂.Numeric)
(hy₁ : y₁.Numeric) (hy₂ : y₂.Numeric) (hx : x₁ ≈ x₂) (hy : y₁ ≈ y₂) : x₁ * y₁ ≈ x₂ * y₂ :=
.trans (mul_congr_left hx₁ hx₂ hy₁ hx) (mul_congr_right hx₂ hy₁ hy₂ hy)
open Prod.GameAdd
/-- One additional inductive argument that supplies the last missing part of Theorem 8. -/
theorem P3_of_lt_of_lt (hx₁ : x₁.Numeric) (hx₂ : x₂.Numeric) (hy₁ : y₁.Numeric) (hy₂ : y₂.Numeric)
(hx : x₁ < x₂) (hy : y₁ < y₂) : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ := by
revert x₁ x₂
rw [← Prod.forall']
refine (wf_isOption.prod_gameAdd wf_isOption).fix ?_
rintro ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ih hx₁ hx₂ hx
refine P3_of_lt ?_ ?_ hx <;> intro i
· have hi := hx₂.moveLeft i
exact ⟨(P24 hx₁ hi hy₁).1, (P24 hx₁ hi hy₂).1,
P3_comm.2 <| ((P24 hy₁ hy₂ hx₂).2 hy).1 _,
ih _ (snd <| IsOption.moveLeft i) hx₁ hi⟩
· have hi := hx₁.neg.moveLeft i
exact ⟨(P24 hx₂.neg hi hy₁).1, (P24 hx₂.neg hi hy₂).1,
P3_comm.2 <| ((P24 hy₁ hy₂ hx₁).2 hy).2 _, by
rw [moveLeft_neg, ← P3_neg, neg_lt_neg_iff]
| exact ih _ (fst <| IsOption.moveRight _) (hx₁.moveRight _) hx₂⟩
theorem Numeric.mul_pos (hx₁ : x₁.Numeric) (hx₂ : x₂.Numeric) (hp₁ : 0 < x₁) (hp₂ : 0 < x₂) :
0 < x₁ * x₂ := by
rw [lt_iff_game_lt]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Multiplication.lean | 491 | 495 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := getElem_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_zero,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj]
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_succ,
getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [get_eq_getElem, hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, get_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _)
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
theorem next_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
next l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + 1) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt hi))) :=
match l, h, i, hi with
| [], _, i, hi => by simp at hi
| [_], _, _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, 0, h0 => by
have h₁ : (x :: y :: l)[0] = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, i+1, hi => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l)[i+1] ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
· simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
rw [next_getElem (y::l), ← getElem_cons_succ (a := x)]
· congr
dsimp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'))]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'), hi']
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [getLast_eq_getElem]
intro h
have := nodup_iff_injective_get.1 hn h
simp at this; simp [this] at hi'
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-015")] alias next_get := next_getElem
-- Unused variable linter incorrectly reports that `h` is unused here.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem prev_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
prev l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + (l.length - 1)) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (by omega))) :=
match l with
| [] => by simp at hi
| x::l => by
induction l generalizing i x with
| nil => simp
| cons y l hl =>
rcases i with (_ | _ | i)
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· simp only [mem_cons, nodup_cons] at h
push_neg at h
simp only [zero_add, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero,
List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ h.left.left.symm, length, add_comm,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.mod_self]
· rw [prev_ne_cons_cons]
· convert hl i.succ y h.of_cons (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hi) using 1
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l)[k] = (x :: y :: l)[k + 1]'(Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) := by
simp
rw [this]
congr
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length]
simp only [length, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hi
set k := l.length
rw [Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ _ k,
Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 0 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨0, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 1 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨1, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias prev_get := prev_getElem
theorem pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : Nodup l) : (l.pmap l.next fun _ h => h) = l.rotate 1 := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intros
rw [getElem_pmap, getElem_rotate, next_getElem _ h]
theorem pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : Nodup l) :
(l.pmap l.prev fun _ h => h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intro n hn hn'
rw [getElem_rotate, getElem_pmap, prev_getElem _ h]
theorem prev_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + 1 + length tl) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, this]
theorem next_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l (prev l x hx) (prev_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + length tl + 1) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp [this]
theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
have lpos : 0 < l.length := k.zero_le.trans_lt hk
have key : l.length - 1 - k < l.length := by omega
rw [← getElem_pmap l.next (fun _ h => h) (by simpa using hk)]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse (l := l), pmap_next_eq_rotate_one _ h]
rw [← getElem_pmap l.reverse.prev fun _ h => h]
· simp_rw [pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one _ (nodup_reverse.mpr h), rotate_reverse,
length_reverse, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt lpos Nat.succ_pos'),
Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lpos)]
rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse]
· simp [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hk)]
· simpa
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = prev l x hx := by
convert (prev_reverse_eq_next l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h) x (mem_reverse.mpr hx)).symm
exact (reverse_reverse l).symm
theorem isRotated_next_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.next x hx = l'.next x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := id h
rw [next_getElem _ hn]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n k]
rw [next_getElem _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn), getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n]
simp [add_assoc]
theorem isRotated_prev_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.prev x hx = l'.prev x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev _ hn, ← next_reverse_eq_prev _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn)]
exact isRotated_next_eq h.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr hn) _
end List
open List
/-- `Cycle α` is the quotient of `List α` by cyclic permutation.
Duplicates are allowed.
-/
def Cycle (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsRotated.setoid α)
namespace Cycle
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The coercion from `List α` to `Cycle α` -/
@[coe] def ofList : List α → Cycle α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Cycle α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Cycle α) = (l₂ : Cycle α) ↔ l₁ ~r l₂ :=
@Quotient.eq _ (IsRotated.setoid _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quot.mk _ l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk''_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quotient.mk'' l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
theorem coe_cons_eq_coe_append (l : List α) (a : α) :
(↑(a :: l) : Cycle α) = (↑(l ++ [a]) : Cycle α) :=
Quot.sound ⟨1, by rw [rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero]⟩
/-- The unique empty cycle. -/
def nil : Cycle α :=
([] : List α)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : ↑([] : List α) = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_nil (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α) = nil ↔ l = [] :=
coe_eq_coe.trans isRotated_nil_iff
/-- For consistency with `EmptyCollection (List α)`. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq : ∅ = @nil α :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- An induction principle for `Cycle`. Use as `induction s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
theorem induction_on {C : Cycle α → Prop} (s : Cycle α) (H0 : C nil)
(HI : ∀ (a) (l : List α), C ↑l → C ↑(a :: l)) : C s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
refine List.recOn l ?_ ?_ <;> simp only [mk''_eq_coe, coe_nil]
assumption'
/-- For `x : α`, `s : Cycle α`, `x ∈ s` indicates that `x` occurs at least once in `s`. -/
def Mem (s : Cycle α) (a : α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun _ _ e => propext <| e.mem_iff
instance : Membership α (Cycle α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (↑l : Cycle α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ nil :=
List.not_mem_nil
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Cycle α) := fun s₁ s₂ =>
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq''
instance [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (s : Cycle α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l => show Decidable (x ∈ l) from inferInstance
/-- Reverse a `s : Cycle α` by reversing the underlying `List`. -/
nonrec def reverse (s : Cycle α) : Cycle α :=
Quot.map reverse (fun _ _ => IsRotated.reverse) s
@[simp]
theorem reverse_coe (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).reverse = l.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_reverse_iff {a : α} {s : Cycle α} : a ∈ s.reverse ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.reverse = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil : nil.reverse = @nil α :=
rfl
/-- The length of the `s : Cycle α`, which is the number of elements, counting duplicates. -/
def length (s : Cycle α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s List.length fun _ _ e => e.perm.length_eq
@[simp]
theorem length_coe (l : List α) : length (l : Cycle α) = l.length :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_nil : length (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.length = s.length :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.length_reverse
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is at most one element. -/
def Subsingleton (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
s.length ≤ 1
theorem subsingleton_nil : Subsingleton (@nil α) := Nat.zero_le _
theorem length_subsingleton_iff {s : Cycle α} : Subsingleton s ↔ length s ≤ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
simp [length_subsingleton_iff]
theorem Subsingleton.congr {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) :
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_hy : y ∈ s), x = y := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe, le_iff_lt_or_eq, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
length_eq_zero_iff, length_eq_one_iff, Nat.not_lt_zero, false_or] at h
rcases h with (rfl | ⟨z, rfl⟩) <;> simp
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is made up of at least two unique elements. -/
def Nontrivial (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
Nontrivial (l : Cycle α) ↔ 2 ≤ l.length := by
rw [Nontrivial]
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp
· simp
· simp only [mem_cons, exists_prop, mem_coe_iff, List.length, Ne, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
Nat.zero_le, iff_true]
refine ⟨hd, hd', ?_, by simp⟩
simp only [not_or, mem_cons, nodup_cons] at hl
exact hl.left.left
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [Nontrivial]
theorem length_nontrivial {s : Cycle α} (h : Nontrivial s) : 2 ≤ length s := by
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := h
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hx
· simp only [mem_coe_iff, mk_eq_coe, mem_singleton] at hx hy
simp [hx, hy] at hxy
· simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` contains no duplicates. -/
nonrec def Nodup (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s Nodup fun _l₁ _l₂ e => propext <| e.nodup_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem nodup_nil : Nodup (@nil α) :=
nodup_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodup_coe_iff {l : List α} : Nodup (l : Cycle α) ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nodup ↔ s.Nodup :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => nodup_reverse
theorem Subsingleton.nodup {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) : Nodup s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := l
· simp
· have : tl = [] := by simpa [Subsingleton, length_eq_zero_iff, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using h
simp [this]
theorem Nodup.nontrivial_iff {s : Cycle α} (h : Nodup s) : Nontrivial s ↔ ¬Subsingleton s := by
rw [length_subsingleton_iff]
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn'
simp only [mk''_eq_coe, nodup_coe_iff] at h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Multiset α`.
-/
def toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (↑) fun _ _ h => Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr h.perm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toMultiset = l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nil_toMultiset : nil.toMultiset = (0 : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset.card s.toMultiset = s.length :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toMultiset = 0 ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The lift of `list.map`. -/
def map {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : Cycle α → Cycle β :=
Quotient.map' (List.map f) fun _ _ h => h.map _
@[simp]
theorem map_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f ↑l = List.map f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Cycle α) : map f s = nil ↔ s = nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {β : Type*} {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Cycle α} :
b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The `Multiset` of lists that can make the cycle. -/
def lists (s : Cycle α) : Multiset (List α) :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (fun l => (l.cyclicPermutations : Multiset (List α))) fun l₁ l₂ h => by
simpa using h.cyclicPermutations.perm
@[simp]
theorem lists_coe (l : List α) : lists (l : Cycle α) = ↑l.cyclicPermutations :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_lists_iff_coe_eq {s : Cycle α} {l : List α} : l ∈ s.lists ↔ (l : Cycle α) = s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
rw [lists, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'']
simp
@[simp]
theorem lists_nil : lists (@nil α) = {([] : List α)} := by
rw [nil, lists_coe, cyclicPermutations_nil, Multiset.coe_singleton]
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Auxiliary decidability algorithm for lists that contain at least two unique elements.
-/
def decidableNontrivialCoe : ∀ l : List α, Decidable (Nontrivial (l : Cycle α))
| [] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| [x] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| x :: y :: l =>
if h : x = y then
@decidable_of_iff' _ (Nontrivial (x :: l : Cycle α)) (by simp [h, Nontrivial])
(decidableNontrivialCoe (x :: l))
else isTrue ⟨x, y, h, by simp, by simp⟩
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nontrivial s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton s decidableNontrivialCoe
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nodup s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton s List.nodupDecidable
instance fintypeNodupCycle [Fintype α] : Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup } :=
Fintype.ofSurjective (fun l : { l : List α // l.Nodup } => ⟨l.val, by simpa using l.prop⟩)
fun ⟨s, hs⟩ => by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn' with s hs
exact ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, by simp⟩
instance fintypeNodupNontrivialCycle [Fintype α] :
Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup ∧ s.Nontrivial } :=
Fintype.subtype
(((Finset.univ : Finset { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup }).map (Function.Embedding.subtype _)).filter
Cycle.Nontrivial)
(by simp)
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Finset α`. -/
def toFinset (s : Cycle α) : Finset α :=
s.toMultiset.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : s.toMultiset.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toFinset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toFinset = l.toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nil_toFinset : (@nil α).toFinset = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- Given a `s : Cycle α` such that `Nodup s`, retrieve the next element after `x ∈ s`. -/
nonrec def next : ∀ (s : Cycle α) (_hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α := fun s =>
Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun (s : Cycle α) => ∀ (_hs : Cycle.Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α) s
(fun l _hn x hx => next l x hx) fun l₁ l₂ h =>
Function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _he =>
Function.hfunext rfl fun x y hxy =>
Function.hfunext (propext (by rw [eq_of_heq hxy]; simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
fun hm hm' he' => heq_of_eq
(by rw [heq_iff_eq] at hxy; subst x; simpa using isRotated_next_eq h h₁ _)
/-- Given a `s : Cycle α` such that `Nodup s`, retrieve the previous element before `x ∈ s`. -/
nonrec def prev : ∀ (s : Cycle α) (_hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α := fun s =>
| Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun (s : Cycle α) => ∀ (_hs : Cycle.Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α) s
(fun l _hn x hx => prev l x hx) fun l₁ l₂ h =>
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 723 | 724 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.empty : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' ∅ x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.empty : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f ∅ x :=
⟨0, .empty⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact .empty
| insert _ _ ih => exact ih.insert'
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨0, .of_finite h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.singleton {y} : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' {x} y :=
.of_finite <| finite_singleton _
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.singleton {y} : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f {x} y :=
⟨0, .singleton⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
hf.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_comp _ _)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
h.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_sub _ _)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| by
simpa only using hf.isLittleOTVS.comp_tendsto (tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds)
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.differentiableAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'` and `K > ‖f'‖₊`, then `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f'‖₊ < K) : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
have := hf.isLittleO.add_isBigOWith (f'.isBigOWith_comp _ _) hK
simp only [sub_add_cancel, IsBigOWith] at this
rcases exists_nhds_square this with ⟨U, Uo, xU, hU⟩
exact
⟨U, Uo.mem_nhds xU, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun x hx y hy => hU (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a
neighborhood of `x`. See also `HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt` for a
more precise statement. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
∃ K, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
(exists_gt _).imp hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `HasFDeriv`. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.lim (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
refine (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 hf).lim _ univ_mem hc ?_
intro U hU
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc (0 : 𝕜)).mono fun y hy => ?_
convert mem_of_mem_nhds hU
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_smul]
theorem HasFDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasFDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ.eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(ht : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union]
exact .of_isLittleOTVS <| hs.isLittleOTVS.sup ht.isLittleOTVS
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp fun _ hf' => hf'.hasFDerivAt hs
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot] at h
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton x, HasFDerivWithinAt, h,
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact .bot
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
@[deprecated HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt <| by rwa [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot]
/-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-20")]
alias hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure := HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_not_accPt h)]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos (.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot h)]
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 :=
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) s x := by
simp only [fderivWithin, dif_pos h]
split_ifs with h₀
exacts [h₀, Classical.choose_spec h]
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x := by
rw [fderiv, ← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ]
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasFDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f (fderiv 𝕜 f x) x :=
((h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hs)).differentiableAt hs).hasFDerivAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableOn.eventually_differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f y :=
(eventually_eventually_nhds.2 hs).mono fun _ => h.differentiableAt
protected theorem HasFDerivAt.fderiv (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = f' := by
ext
rw [h.unique h.differentiableAt.hasFDerivAt]
theorem fderiv_eq {f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F} (h : ∀ x, HasFDerivAt f (f' x) x) : fderiv 𝕜 f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).fderiv
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = f' :=
(hxs.eq h h.differentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt).symm
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases h with ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact ⟨f', hf'.mono st⟩
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E} (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).differentiableWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem := DifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) {t : Set E}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set E} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert_self :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.mono (subset_insert x s), fun h ↦ h.hasFDerivWithinAt.insert.differentiableWithinAt⟩
theorem differentiableWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert y s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact differentiableWithinAt_insert_self
apply differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds
exact nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h
alias ⟨DifferentiableWithinAt.of_insert, DifferentiableWithinAt.insert'⟩ :=
differentiableWithinAt_insert
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.insert (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
theorem DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(differentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.differentiableAt (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h x
protected theorem DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt.fderivWithin hxs
theorem DifferentiableOn.mono (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f t) (st : s ⊆ t) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem differentiableOn_univ : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f univ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [DifferentiableOn, Differentiable, differentiableWithinAt_univ, mem_univ,
forall_true_left]
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.differentiableOn (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
(differentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem differentiableOn_of_locally_differentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f (s ∩ u)) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (differentiableWithinAt_inter (IsOpen.mem_nhds t_open xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem fderivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin (st : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x :=
((DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin st).fderivWithin ht
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias fderivWithin_of_mem := fderivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem fderivWithin_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x :=
fderivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin (nhdsWithin_mono _ st self_mem_nhdsWithin) ht h
theorem fderivWithin_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f (s ∩ t) x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
simp [fderivWithin, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter ht, DifferentiableWithinAt]
theorem fderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← univ_inter s, fderivWithin_inter h]
theorem fderivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
fderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
theorem fderivWithin_eq_fderiv (hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ]
exact fderivWithin_subset (subset_univ _) hs h.differentiableWithinAt
theorem fderiv_mem_iff {f : E → F} {s : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {x : E} : fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ fderiv 𝕜 f x ∈ s ∨ ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x <;> simp [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt, *]
theorem fderivWithin_mem_iff {f : E → F} {t : Set E} {s : Set (E →L[𝕜] F)} {x : E} :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x ∈ s ∨
¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x <;>
simp [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, *]
theorem Asymptotics.IsBigO.hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set E} {x₀ : E} {n : ℕ}
(h : f =O[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hn : 1 < n) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x₀ := by
simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO,
h.eq_zero_of_norm_pow_within hx₀ hn.ne_bot, zero_apply, sub_zero,
h.trans_isLittleO ((isLittleO_pow_sub_sub x₀ hn).mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds)]
theorem Asymptotics.IsBigO.hasFDerivAt {x₀ : E} {n : ℕ} (h : f =O[𝓝 x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n)
(hn : 1 < n) : HasFDerivAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x₀ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at h
exact (h.hasFDerivWithinAt (mem_univ _) hn).hasFDerivAt_of_univ
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x₀ : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x₀) : (f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝[s] x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.isBigO_sub
lemma DifferentiableWithinAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x₀ : E}
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x₀) : (f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝[s] x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {x₀ : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
(h : HasFDerivAt f f' x₀) : (f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝 x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.isBigO_sub
nonrec theorem DifferentiableAt.isBigO_sub {f : E → F} {x₀ : E} (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x₀) :
(f · - f x₀) =O[𝓝 x₀] (· - x₀) :=
h.hasFDerivAt.isBigO_sub
end FDerivProperties
section Continuous
/-! ### Deducing continuity from differentiability -/
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
Tendsto f L (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have : Tendsto (fun x' => f x' - f x) L (𝓝 0) := by
refine h.isBigO_sub.trans_tendsto (Tendsto.mono_left ?_ hL)
rw [← sub_self x]
exact tendsto_id.sub tendsto_const_nhds
have := this.add (tendsto_const_nhds (x := f x))
rw [zero_add (f x)] at this
exact this.congr (by simp only [sub_add_cancel, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const])
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds inf_le_left h
theorem HasFDerivAt.continuousAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds le_rfl h
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
let ⟨_, hf'⟩ := h
hf'.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.continuousAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
let ⟨_, hf'⟩ := h
hf'.continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.continuous (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.continuousAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.continuousAt
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub_rev {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F}
(hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) x) :
(fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 :=
((f'.isBigO_comp_rev _ _).trans
(hf.isLittleO.trans_isBigO (f'.isBigO_comp_rev _ _)).right_isBigO_add).congr
(fun _ => rfl) fun _ => sub_add_cancel _ _
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) {C}
(hf' : AntilipschitzWith C f') : (fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
have : (fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f' (x' - x) :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨C, Eventually.of_forall fun _ => ZeroHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz f' hf' _⟩
(this.trans (hf.isLittleO.trans_isBigO this).right_isBigO_add).congr (fun _ => rfl) fun _ =>
sub_add_cancel _ _
end Continuous
section congr
/-! ### congr properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
calc
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x :=
(hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _).symm
_ ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (t \ {y}) x := by
suffices 𝓝[s \ {y}] x = 𝓝[t \ {y}] x by simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, this]
simpa only [set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal, ← nhdsWithin_inter', diff_eq,
inter_comm] using h
_ ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x := hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' x <| h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
exists_congr fun _ => hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' _ h
theorem differentiableWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x :=
exists_congr fun _ => hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
theorem fderivWithin_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x := by
classical
simp only [fderivWithin, differentiableWithinAt_congr_set' _ h, hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' _ h]
theorem fderivWithin_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f t x :=
fderivWithin_congr_set' x <| h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem fderivWithin_eventually_congr_set' (y : E) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f t :=
(eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).mono fun _ => fderivWithin_congr_set' y
theorem fderivWithin_eventually_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f t :=
fderivWithin_eventually_congr_set' x <| h.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasStrictFDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) (h' : ∀ y, f₀' y = f₁' y) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f₀ f₀' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f₁ f₁' x := by
rw [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS, hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
refine isLittleOTVS_congr ((h.prodMk_nhds h).mono ?_) .rfl
rintro p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩
simp only [*]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_fderiv (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasStrictFDerivAt f g' x :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasFDerivAt.congr_fderiv (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') : HasFDerivAt f g' x :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_fderiv (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasFDerivWithinAt f g' s x :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) : HasStrictFDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
(h₁.hasStrictFDerivAt_iff fun _ => rfl).1 h
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff (h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x)
(h₁ : ∀ x, f₀' x = f₁' x) : HasFDerivAtFilter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f₁ f₁' x L := by
simp only [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact isLittleOTVS_congr (h₀.mono fun y hy => by simp only [hy, h₁, hx]) .rfl
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[L] f)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasFDerivAtFilter f₁ f' x L :=
(hL.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx fun _ => rfl).2 h
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
HasFDerivAt f₀ f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff h.eq_of_nhds fun _ => _root_.rfl
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.differentiableAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₀ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₁ x :=
exists_congr fun _ => h.hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f₀ f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx fun _ => _root_.rfl
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f₀ f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff (h.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.differentiableWithinAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
exists_congr fun _ => h.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff hx
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.differentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f₁) (hx : x ∈ s) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₀ s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
h.differentiableWithinAt_iff (h.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : EqOn f₁ f t)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' t x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h.mono h₁) (Filter.mem_inf_of_right ht) hx
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : EqOn f₁ f s)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr' (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr hs (hs hx)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ hx
theorem HasFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
HasFDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhds h₁ :)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (ht : EqOn f₁ f t)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ t x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasFDerivWithinAt ht hx h₁).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (ht : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono h ht hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx).differentiableWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h₁ :)
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f₁ s x :=
(h.insert.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁ (mem_insert _ _)).of_insert
theorem DifferentiableOn.congr_mono (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (h' : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(h₁ : t ⊆ s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₁ t := fun x hx => (h x (h₁ hx)).congr_mono h' (h' x hx) h₁
theorem DifferentiableOn.congr (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (h' : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₁ s := fun x hx => (h x hx).congr h' (h' x hx)
theorem differentiableOn_congr (h' : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f₁ s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => DifferentiableOn.congr h fun y hy => (h' y hy).symm, fun h =>
DifferentiableOn.congr h h'⟩
theorem DifferentiableAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f₁ x :=
hL.differentiableAt_iff.2 h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.fderivWithin_congr_mono (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : EqOn f₁ f t) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (hxt : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 t x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ t x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasFDerivWithinAt hs hx h₁).fderivWithin hxt
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
simp only [fderivWithin, DifferentiableWithinAt, hs.hasFDerivWithinAt_iff hx]
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq_of_mem (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
hs.fderivWithin_eq (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx hs :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq_of_insert (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
apply Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert x s) hs)
exact (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) hs :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin' (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (ht : t ⊆ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ t =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f t :=
(eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin.2 hs).mp <|
eventually_mem_nhdsWithin.mono fun _y hys hs =>
EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq (hs.filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ ht)
(hs.self_of_nhdsWithin hys)
protected theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] fderivWithin 𝕜 f s :=
hs.fderivWithin' Subset.rfl
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq_nhds (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds).fderivWithin_eq h.self_of_nhds
theorem fderivWithin_congr (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(hs.eventuallyEq.filter_mono inf_le_right).fderivWithin_eq hx
theorem fderivWithin_congr' (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f₁ s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_congr hs (hs hx)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderiv_eq (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : fderiv 𝕜 f₁ x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ, h.fderivWithin_eq_nhds]
protected theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.fderiv (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : fderiv 𝕜 f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fderiv 𝕜 f :=
h.eventuallyEq_nhds.mono fun _ h => h.fderiv_eq
end congr
section id
/-! ### Derivative of the identity -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_id (x : E) : HasStrictFDerivAt id (id 𝕜 E) x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left <| by simp
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_id (x : E) (L : Filter E) : HasFDerivAtFilter id (id 𝕜 E) x L :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left <| by simp
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_id (x : E) (s : Set E) : HasFDerivWithinAt id (id 𝕜 E) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_id _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_id (x : E) : HasFDerivAt id (id 𝕜 E) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_id _ _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_id : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 id x :=
(hasFDerivAt_id x).differentiableAt
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_id' : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => x) x :=
(hasFDerivAt_id x).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_id : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 id s x :=
differentiableAt_id.differentiableWithinAt
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_id' : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => x) s x :=
differentiableWithinAt_id
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiable_id : Differentiable 𝕜 (id : E → E) := fun _ => differentiableAt_id
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_id' : Differentiable 𝕜 fun x : E => x := fun _ => differentiableAt_id
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableOn_id : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 id s :=
differentiable_id.differentiableOn
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_id : fderiv 𝕜 id x = id 𝕜 E :=
HasFDerivAt.fderiv (hasFDerivAt_id x)
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_id' : fderiv 𝕜 (fun x : E => x) x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E :=
fderiv_id
theorem fderivWithin_id (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 id s x = id 𝕜 E := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin differentiableAt_id hxs]
exact fderiv_id
theorem fderivWithin_id' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x : E => x) s x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E :=
fderivWithin_id hxs
end id
section Const
/-! ### Derivative of constant functions
This include the constant functions `0`, `1`, `Nat.cast n`, `Int.cast z`, and other numerals.
-/
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_const (c : F) (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [zero_apply, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_zero (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_one [One F] (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasStrictFDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_const (c : F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| (IsLittleOTVS.zero _ _).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [zero_apply, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_zero (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L := hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_one [One F] (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L := hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) (L : Filter E) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_const (c : F) (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_zero (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x := hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_one [One F] (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x := hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) (s : Set E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_const (c : F) (x : E) : HasFDerivAt (fun _ => c) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_zero (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (0 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_one [One F] (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (1 : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (n : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (z : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (ofNat(n) : E → F) (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) x := hasFDerivAt_const _ _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_const (c : F) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun _ => c) x :=
⟨0, hasFDerivAt_const c x⟩
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_zero (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (0 : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_one [One F] (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (1 : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (n : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (z : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[simp low, fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] (x : E) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (ofNat(n) : E → F) x := differentiableAt_const _
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_const (c : F) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun _ => c) s x :=
DifferentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt (differentiableAt_const _)
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_zero :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (0 : E → F) s x := differentiableWithinAt_const _
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_one [One F] :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (1 : E → F) s x := differentiableWithinAt_const _
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (n : E → F) s x := differentiableWithinAt_const _
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (z : E → F) s x := differentiableWithinAt_const _
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (ofNat(n) : E → F) s x := differentiableWithinAt_const _
theorem fderivWithin_const_apply (c : F) : fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun _ => c) s x = 0 := by
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos]
apply hasFDerivWithinAt_const
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_const (c : F) : fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun _ ↦ c) s = 0 := by
ext
rw [fderivWithin_const_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_zero : fderivWithin 𝕜 (0 : E → F) s = 0 := fderivWithin_const _
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_one [One F] : fderivWithin 𝕜 (1 : E → F) s = 0 := fderivWithin_const _
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : fderivWithin 𝕜 (n : E → F) s = 0 :=
fderivWithin_const _
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : fderivWithin 𝕜 (z : E → F) s = 0 :=
fderivWithin_const _
@[simp low]
theorem fderivWithin_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : fderivWithin 𝕜 (ofNat(n) : E → F) s = 0 :=
fderivWithin_const _
theorem fderiv_const_apply (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun _ => c) x = 0 :=
(hasFDerivAt_const c x).fderiv
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_const (c : F) : (fderiv 𝕜 fun _ : E => c) = 0 := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_const]
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_zero : fderiv 𝕜 (0 : E → F) = 0 := fderiv_const _
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_one [One F] : fderiv 𝕜 (1 : E → F) = 0 := fderiv_const _
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : fderiv 𝕜 (n : E → F) = 0 := fderiv_const _
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : fderiv 𝕜 (z : E → F) = 0 := fderiv_const _
@[simp low]
theorem fderiv_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : fderiv 𝕜 (ofNat(n) : E → F) = 0 := fderiv_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiable_const (c : F) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun _ : E => c := fun _ =>
differentiableAt_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem differentiable_zero :
| Differentiable 𝕜 (0 : E → F) := differentiable_const _
@[simp, fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 1,270 | 1,272 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Subfield.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleRing.Basic
/-!
# Fraction ring / fraction field Frac(R) as localization
## Main definitions
* `IsFractionRing R K` expresses that `K` is a field of fractions of `R`, as an abbreviation of
`IsLocalization (NonZeroDivisors R) K`
## Main results
* `IsFractionRing.field`: a definition (not an instance) stating the localization of an integral
domain `R` at `R \ {0}` is a field
* `Rat.isFractionRing` is an instance stating `ℚ` is the field of fractions of `ℤ`
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] (K : Type*)
-- TODO: should this extend `Algebra` instead of assuming it?
/-- `IsFractionRing R K` states `K` is the ring of fractions of a commutative ring `R`. -/
abbrev IsFractionRing [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] :=
IsLocalization (nonZeroDivisors R) K
instance {R : Type*} [Field R] : IsFractionRing R R :=
IsLocalization.at_units _ (fun _ ↦ isUnit_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors)
/-- The cast from `Int` to `Rat` as a `FractionRing`. -/
instance Rat.isFractionRing : IsFractionRing ℤ ℚ where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero] at hx
simpa only [eq_intCast, isUnit_iff_ne_zero, Int.cast_eq_zero, Ne, Subtype.coe_mk] using hx
surj' := by
rintro ⟨n, d, hd, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, ⟨d, ?_⟩⟩, Rat.mul_den_eq_num _⟩
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos]
exact Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hd
exists_of_eq {x y} := by
rw [eq_intCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_inj]
rintro rfl
use 1
namespace IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
theorem of_field [Field K] [Algebra R K] [FaithfulSMul R K]
(surj : ∀ z : K, ∃ x y, z = algebraMap R K x / algebraMap R K y) :
IsFractionRing R K :=
have inj := FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R K
have := inj.noZeroDivisors _ (map_zero _) (map_mul _)
have := Module.nontrivial R K
{ map_units' x :=
.mk0 _ <| (map_ne_zero_iff _ inj).mpr <| mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp x.2
surj' z := by
have ⟨x, y, eq⟩ := surj z
obtain rfl | hy := eq_or_ne y 0
· obtain rfl : z = 0 := by simpa using eq
exact ⟨(0, 1), by simp⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, y, mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr hy⟩,
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq <| (map_ne_zero_iff _ inj).mpr hy).mp eq⟩
exists_of_eq eq := ⟨1, by simpa using inj eq⟩ }
variable {R K}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
theorem to_map_eq_zero_iff {x : R} : algebraMap R K x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
IsLocalization.to_map_eq_zero_iff _ le_rfl
variable (R K)
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap R K) :=
IsLocalization.injective _ (le_of_eq rfl)
instance (priority := 100) : FaithfulSMul R K :=
(faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective R K).mpr <| IsFractionRing.injective R K
variable {R K}
@[norm_cast, simp]
-- Porting note: using `↑` didn't work, so I needed to explicitly put in the cast myself
theorem coe_inj {a b : R} : (Algebra.cast a : K) = Algebra.cast b ↔ a = b :=
(IsFractionRing.injective R K).eq_iff
protected theorem to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors [Nontrivial R] {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) : algebraMap R K x ≠ 0 :=
IsLocalization.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ le_rfl hx
variable (A) [IsDomain A]
include A in
/-- A `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R - {0}` is an
integral domain. -/
protected theorem isDomain : IsDomain K :=
isDomain_of_le_nonZeroDivisors _ (le_refl (nonZeroDivisors A))
/-- The inverse of an element in the field of fractions of an integral domain. -/
protected noncomputable irreducible_def inv (z : K) : K := open scoped Classical in
if h : z = 0 then 0
else
mk' K ↑(sec (nonZeroDivisors A) z).2
⟨(sec _ z).1,
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h0 =>
h <| eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero (sec_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) z) h0⟩
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (x : K) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x * IsFractionRing.inv A x = 1 := by
rw [IsFractionRing.inv, dif_neg hx, ←
IsUnit.mul_left_inj
(map_units K
⟨(sec _ x).1,
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h0 =>
hx <| eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero (sec_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) x) h0⟩),
one_mul, mul_assoc]
rw [mk'_spec, ← eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq]
exact (mk'_sec _ x).symm
/-- A `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R - {0}` is a field.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[stacks 09FJ]
noncomputable abbrev toField : Field K where
__ := IsFractionRing.isDomain A
inv := IsFractionRing.inv A
mul_inv_cancel := IsFractionRing.mul_inv_cancel A
inv_zero := show IsFractionRing.inv A (0 : K) = 0 by rw [IsFractionRing.inv]; exact dif_pos rfl
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
lemma surjective_iff_isField [IsDomain R] : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R K) ↔ IsField R where
mp h := (RingEquiv.ofBijective (algebraMap R K)
⟨IsFractionRing.injective R K, h⟩).toMulEquiv.isField _ (IsFractionRing.toField R).toIsField
mpr h :=
letI := h.toField
(IsLocalization.atUnits R _ (S := K)
(fun _ hx ↦ Ne.isUnit (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hx))).surjective
end CommRing
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDomain B] [Field K] {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra A K]
[IsFractionRing A K] {g : A →+* L}
theorem mk'_mk_eq_div {r s} (hs : s ∈ nonZeroDivisors A) :
mk' K r ⟨s, hs⟩ = algebraMap A K r / algebraMap A K s :=
haveI := (algebraMap A K).domain_nontrivial
mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <|
(div_mul_cancel₀ (algebraMap A K r)
(IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hs)).symm
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_div {r} (s : nonZeroDivisors A) : mk' K r s = algebraMap A K r / algebraMap A K s :=
mk'_mk_eq_div s.2
theorem div_surjective (z : K) :
∃ x y : A, y ∈ nonZeroDivisors A ∧ algebraMap _ _ x / algebraMap _ _ y = z :=
let ⟨x, ⟨y, hy⟩, h⟩ := mk'_surjective (nonZeroDivisors A) z
⟨x, y, hy, by rwa [mk'_eq_div] at h⟩
theorem isUnit_map_of_injective (hg : Function.Injective g) (y : nonZeroDivisors A) :
IsUnit (g y) :=
haveI := g.domain_nontrivial
IsUnit.mk0 (g y) <|
show g.toMonoidWithZeroHom y ≠ 0 from map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors g hg y.2
theorem mk'_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] {x : R} {y : nonZeroDivisors R} :
mk' K x y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
haveI := (algebraMap R K).domain_nontrivial
simp [nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero]
theorem mk'_eq_one_iff_eq {x : A} {y : nonZeroDivisors A} : mk' K x y = 1 ↔ x = y := by
haveI := (algebraMap A K).domain_nontrivial
refine ⟨?_, fun hxy => by rw [hxy, mk'_self']⟩
intro hxy
have hy : (algebraMap A K) ↑y ≠ (0 : K) :=
IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors y.property
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_one_iff_eq hy] at hxy
exact IsFractionRing.injective A K hxy
section Subfield
variable (A K) in
/-- If `A` is a commutative ring with fraction field `K`, then the subfield of `K` generated by
the image of `algebraMap A K` is equal to the whole field `K`. -/
theorem closure_range_algebraMap : Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap A K)) = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun z _ ↦ by
obtain ⟨_, _, -, rfl⟩ := div_surjective (A := A) z
apply div_mem <;> exact Subfield.subset_closure ⟨_, rfl⟩
variable {L : Type*} [Field L] {g : A →+* L} {f : K →+* L}
/-- If `A` is a commutative ring with fraction field `K`, `L` is a field, `g : A →+* L` lifts to
`f : K →+* L`, then the image of `f` is the subfield generated by the image of `g`. -/
theorem ringHom_fieldRange_eq_of_comp_eq (h : RingHom.comp f (algebraMap A K) = g) :
| f.fieldRange = Subfield.closure g.range := by
rw [f.fieldRange_eq_map, ← closure_range_algebraMap A K,
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/FractionRing.lean | 219 | 220 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
/-!
# Real sign function
This file introduces and contains some results about `Real.sign` which maps negative
real numbers to -1, positive real numbers to 1, and 0 to 0.
## Main definitions
* `Real.sign r` is $\begin{cases} -1 & \text{if } r < 0, \\
~~\, 0 & \text{if } r = 0, \\
~~\, 1 & \text{if } r > 0. \end{cases}$
## Tags
sign function
-/
namespace Real
/-- The sign function that maps negative real numbers to -1, positive numbers to 1, and 0
otherwise. -/
noncomputable def sign (r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if r < 0 then -1 else if 0 < r then 1 else 0
theorem sign_of_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : sign r = -1 := by rw [sign, if_pos hr]
theorem sign_of_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : sign r = 1 := by rw [sign, if_pos hr, if_neg hr.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := by rw [sign, if_neg (lt_irrefl _), if_neg (lt_irrefl _)]
@[simp]
theorem sign_one : sign 1 = 1 :=
sign_of_pos <| by norm_num
theorem sign_apply_eq (r : ℝ) : sign r = -1 ∨ sign r = 0 ∨ sign r = 1 := by
obtain hn | rfl | hp := lt_trichotomy r (0 : ℝ)
· exact Or.inl <| sign_of_neg hn
| · exact Or.inr <| Or.inl <| sign_zero
· exact Or.inr <| Or.inr <| sign_of_pos hp
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Sign.lean | 48 | 49 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SFinite ν] [SFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prodMk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.Eventually.of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prodMk_right
apply measurable_const.prodMk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ae : (ae μ)⁻¹ = ae μ := by
refine le_antisymm (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae ?_
nth_rewrite 1 [← inv_inv (ae μ)]
exact Filter.map_mono (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).tendsto_ae
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventuallyConst_inv_set_ae :
EventuallyConst (s⁻¹ : Set G) (ae μ) ↔ EventuallyConst s (ae μ) := by
rw [← inv_preimage, eventuallyConst_preimage, Filter.map_inv, inv_ae]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prodMk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
have := map_map (μ := μ) (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
rw [← this]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
· exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
∀ x : G, Measurable fun y => ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y :=
fun x => measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm)
have : ∀ x y, s.indicator (fun _ : G => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun b : G => 1) y := by
intro x y; symm; convert indicator_comp_right (M := ℝ≥0∞) fun y => y * x using 2; ext1; rfl
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (ms _), lintegral_indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm),
setLIntegral_one]
/-- Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. -/
@[to_additive
" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. "]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s sm hνs => ?_
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm 1 measurable_one
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνs,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞), measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false] at h1
exact h1
section SigmaFinite
variable (μ' ν' : Measure G) [SigmaFinite μ'] [SigmaFinite ν'] [IsMulLeftInvariant μ']
[IsMulLeftInvariant ν']
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top (hμs : μ' s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ', ν' ((· * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
wlog sm : MeasurableSet s generalizing s
· filter_upwards [this ((measure_toMeasurable _).trans_ne hμs) (measurableSet_toMeasurable ..)]
with x hx using lt_of_le_of_lt (by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable) hx
refine ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict' ν'.inv _ ?_
intro A hA _ h3A
simp only [ν'.inv_apply] at h3A
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_mul_right ν' sm)
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ' ν' sm (A⁻¹.indicator 1) (measurable_one.indicator hA.inv)
rw [lintegral_indicator hA.inv] at h1
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, setLIntegral_one, ← image_inv_eq_inv, indicator_image inv_injective,
image_inv_eq_inv, ← indicator_mul_right _ fun x => ν' ((· * x) ⁻¹' s), Function.comp,
Pi.one_apply, mul_one] at h1
rw [← lintegral_indicator hA, ← h1]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs h3A.ne
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero (h2s : ν' s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν' s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ', ν' ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top ν' ν' h3s).filter_mono ?_
refine (absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant μ' ν' ?_).ae_le
| refine mt ?_ h2s
intro hν
rw [hν, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A].
Note that if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that
`μ t = c * μ s` for a constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos].
In the last line, the equality `g(x⁻¹)ν(sx⁻¹) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that
`0 < ν(sx⁻¹) < ∞`. The first inequality follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is
not justified. We prove this inequality for almost all `x` in
`MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 279 | 291 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.State
/-!
# Domineering as a combinatorial game.
We define the game of Domineering, played on a chessboard of arbitrary shape
(possibly even disconnected).
Left moves by placing a domino vertically, while Right moves by placing a domino horizontally.
This is only a fragment of a full development;
in order to successfully analyse positions we would need some more theorems.
Most importantly, we need a general statement that allows us to discard irrelevant moves.
Specifically to domineering, we need the fact that
disjoint parts of the chessboard give sums of games.
-/
namespace SetTheory
namespace PGame
namespace Domineering
open Function
/-- The equivalence `(x, y) ↦ (x, y+1)`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftUp : ℤ × ℤ ≃ ℤ × ℤ :=
(Equiv.refl ℤ).prodCongr (Equiv.addRight (1 : ℤ))
/-- The equivalence `(x, y) ↦ (x+1, y)`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftRight : ℤ × ℤ ≃ ℤ × ℤ :=
(Equiv.addRight (1 : ℤ)).prodCongr (Equiv.refl ℤ)
/-- A Domineering board is an arbitrary finite subset of `ℤ × ℤ`. -/
-- Porting note: reducibility cannot be `local`. For now there are no dependents of this file so
-- being globally reducible is fine.
abbrev Board :=
Finset (ℤ × ℤ)
/-- Left can play anywhere that a square and the square below it are open. -/
def left (b : Board) : Finset (ℤ × ℤ) :=
b ∩ b.map shiftUp
/-- Right can play anywhere that a square and the square to the left are open. -/
def right (b : Board) : Finset (ℤ × ℤ) :=
b ∩ b.map shiftRight
theorem mem_left {b : Board} (x : ℤ × ℤ) : x ∈ left b ↔ x ∈ b ∧ (x.1, x.2 - 1) ∈ b :=
Finset.mem_inter.trans (and_congr Iff.rfl Finset.mem_map_equiv)
theorem mem_right {b : Board} (x : ℤ × ℤ) : x ∈ right b ↔ x ∈ b ∧ (x.1 - 1, x.2) ∈ b :=
Finset.mem_inter.trans (and_congr Iff.rfl Finset.mem_map_equiv)
/-- After Left moves, two vertically adjacent squares are removed from the board. -/
def moveLeft (b : Board) (m : ℤ × ℤ) : Board :=
(b.erase m).erase (m.1, m.2 - 1)
/-- After Left moves, two horizontally adjacent squares are removed from the board. -/
def moveRight (b : Board) (m : ℤ × ℤ) : Board :=
(b.erase m).erase (m.1 - 1, m.2)
theorem fst_pred_mem_erase_of_mem_right {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ right b) :
(m.1 - 1, m.2) ∈ b.erase m := by
rw [mem_right] at h
apply Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ h.2
exact ne_of_apply_ne Prod.fst (pred_ne_self m.1)
theorem snd_pred_mem_erase_of_mem_left {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ left b) :
(m.1, m.2 - 1) ∈ b.erase m := by
rw [mem_left] at h
apply Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem _ h.2
exact ne_of_apply_ne Prod.snd (pred_ne_self m.2)
theorem card_of_mem_left {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ left b) : 2 ≤ Finset.card b := by
have w₁ : m ∈ b := (Finset.mem_inter.1 h).1
have w₂ : (m.1, m.2 - 1) ∈ b.erase m := snd_pred_mem_erase_of_mem_left h
have i₁ := Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem w₁
have i₂ := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) (Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem w₂)
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt i₂ i₁
theorem card_of_mem_right {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ right b) : 2 ≤ Finset.card b := by
have w₁ : m ∈ b := (Finset.mem_inter.1 h).1
have w₂ := fst_pred_mem_erase_of_mem_right h
have i₁ := Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem w₁
have i₂ := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) (Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem w₂)
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt i₂ i₁
theorem moveLeft_card {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ left b) :
Finset.card (moveLeft b m) + 2 = Finset.card b := by
dsimp only [moveLeft]
rw [Finset.card_erase_of_mem (snd_pred_mem_erase_of_mem_left h)]
rw [Finset.card_erase_of_mem (Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left h)]
exact tsub_add_cancel_of_le (card_of_mem_left h)
theorem moveRight_card {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ right b) :
Finset.card (moveRight b m) + 2 = Finset.card b := by
dsimp only [moveRight]
rw [Finset.card_erase_of_mem (fst_pred_mem_erase_of_mem_right h)]
rw [Finset.card_erase_of_mem (Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left h)]
exact tsub_add_cancel_of_le (card_of_mem_right h)
theorem moveLeft_smaller {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ left b) :
Finset.card (moveLeft b m) / 2 < Finset.card b / 2 := by simp [← moveLeft_card h, lt_add_one]
theorem moveRight_smaller {b : Board} {m : ℤ × ℤ} (h : m ∈ right b) :
Finset.card (moveRight b m) / 2 < Finset.card b / 2 := by simp [← moveRight_card h, lt_add_one]
/-- The instance describing allowed moves on a Domineering board. -/
instance state : State Board where
turnBound s := s.card / 2
l s := (left s).image (moveLeft s)
r s := (right s).image (moveRight s)
left_bound m := by
simp only [Finset.mem_image, Prod.exists] at m
rcases m with ⟨_, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩⟩
exact moveLeft_smaller h
right_bound m := by
simp only [Finset.mem_image, Prod.exists] at m
| rcases m with ⟨_, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩⟩
exact moveRight_smaller h
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Domineering.lean | 125 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
ENat.toNat (trailingDegree p)
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) :=
.symm <| ENat.coe_toNat <| mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_inj]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, ENat.toNat_eq_iff hn]
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, h]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p :=
ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n :=
ENat.toNat_le_of_le_coe <| trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe <| support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 :=
Finset.min_eq_bot.trans mem_support_iff
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, or_comm]
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans <| by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p :=
(trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h).trans natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n :=
mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_le] at H
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (hq : q ≠ 0)
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree :=
ENat.toNat_le_toNat hpq <| by simpa
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree (h : (n : ℕ∞) < trailingDegree p) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n < p.natTrailingDegree) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_top n
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {hp : (0 : ℕ∞) < natTrailingDegree p} :
p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree - 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree <|
Nat.sub_lt (WithTop.coe_pos.mp hp) Nat.one_pos
theorem le_trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow n (1 : R)
theorem le_trailingDegree_X : (1 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X : R[X]) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree ≤ 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_eq_zero : trailingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h)
(mem_of_min (trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero : trailingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
not_congr trailingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero : p ≠ 0 → natTrailingDegree p ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.mpr ∘ trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → natTrailingDegree p ≤ a :=
natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' (h : p ≠ 0) :
natTrailingDegree p = p.support.min' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree, ← Finset.coe_min', ENat.some_eq_coe, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem le_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) (hn : ∀ m < n, p.coeff m = 0) :
n ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' hp]
exact Finset.le_min' _ _ _ fun m hm => not_lt.1 fun hmn => mem_support_iff.1 hm <| hn _ hmn
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
· exact le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp)
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(p * X ^ n).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + n := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero fun h => mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp ?_
rwa [trailingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow]
· rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' fun h => hp (mul_X_pow_eq_zero h), Finset.le_min'_iff]
intro y hy
have key : n ≤ y := by
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow'] at hy
exact by_contra fun h => hy (if_neg h)
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow', if_pos key] at hy
exact (le_tsub_iff_right key).mp (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hy)
theorem le_trailingDegree_mul : p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree ≤ (p * q).trailingDegree := by
refine Finset.le_min fun n hn => ?_
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul] at hn
obtain ⟨⟨i, j⟩, hij, hpq⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hn
refine
(add_le_add (min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (left_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))
(min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (right_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))).trans_eq ?_
rwa [← WithTop.coe_add, WithTop.coe_eq_coe, ← mem_antidiagonal]
theorem le_natTrailingDegree_mul (h : p * q ≠ 0) :
p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree ≤ (p * q).natTrailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, mul_zero])
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, WithTop.coe_add, ← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree p),
← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree q), ← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree (p * q)),
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree h]
exact le_trailingDegree_mul
theorem coeff_mul_natTrailingDegree_add_natTrailingDegree : (p * q).coeff
(p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree) = p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff := by
rw [coeff_mul]
refine
Finset.sum_eq_single (p.natTrailingDegree, q.natTrailingDegree) ?_ fun h =>
(h (mem_antidiagonal.mpr rfl)).elim
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h₁ h₂
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at h₁
by_cases hi : i < p.natTrailingDegree
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree hi, zero_mul]
by_cases hj : j < q.natTrailingDegree
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree hj, mul_zero]
rw [not_lt] at hi hj
refine (h₂ (Prod.ext_iff.mpr ?_).symm).elim
exact (add_eq_add_iff_eq_and_eq hi hj).mp h₁.symm
theorem trailingDegree_mul' (h : p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
| have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, trailingCoeff_zero, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, trailingCoeff_zero, mul_zero])
refine le_antisymm ?_ le_trailingDegree_mul
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq, ←
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 319 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.OrderedMonoid
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Powerset
/-!
# Big operators on a finset in ordered groups
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of multiset big operators with ordered
groups/monoids.
-/
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
variable {ι α β M N G k R : Type*}
namespace Finset
section OrderedCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N] [PartialOrder N] [IsOrderedMonoid N]
/-- Let `{x | p x}` be a subsemigroup of a commutative monoid `M`. Let `f : M → N` be a map
submultiplicative on `{x | p x}`, i.e., `p x → p y → f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y`. Let `g i`, `i ∈ s`, be
a nonempty finite family of elements of `M` such that `∀ i ∈ s, p (g i)`. Then
`f (∏ x ∈ s, g x) ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x)`. -/
@[to_additive le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive_on_pred]
theorem le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred (f : M → N) (p : M → Prop)
(h_mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y) (hp_mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(g : ι → M) (s : Finset ι) (hs_nonempty : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, p (g i)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
refine le_trans
(Multiset.le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f p h_mul hp_mul _ ?_ ?_) ?_
· simp [hs_nonempty.ne_empty]
· exact Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr hs
rw [Multiset.map_map]
rfl
/-- Let `{x | p x}` be an additive subsemigroup of an additive commutative monoid `M`. Let
`f : M → N` be a map subadditive on `{x | p x}`, i.e., `p x → p y → f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y`. Let
`g i`, `i ∈ s`, be a nonempty finite family of elements of `M` such that `∀ i ∈ s, p (g i)`. Then
`f (∑ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f (g i)`. -/
add_decl_doc le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive_on_pred
/-- If `f : M → N` is a submultiplicative function, `f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y` and `g i`, `i ∈ s`, is a
nonempty finite family of elements of `M`, then `f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i)`. -/
@[to_additive le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive]
theorem le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative (f : M → N) (h_mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y)
{s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (g : ι → M) : f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f (fun _ ↦ True) (fun x y _ _ ↦ h_mul x y)
(fun _ _ _ _ ↦ trivial) g s hs fun _ _ ↦ trivial
/-- If `f : M → N` is a subadditive function, `f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y` and `g i`, `i ∈ s`, is a
nonempty finite family of elements of `M`, then `f (∑ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f (g i)`. -/
add_decl_doc le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive
/-- Let `{x | p x}` be a subsemigroup of a commutative monoid `M`. Let `f : M → N` be a map
such that `f 1 = 1` and `f` is submultiplicative on `{x | p x}`, i.e.,
`p x → p y → f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y`. Let `g i`, `i ∈ s`, be a finite family of elements of `M` such
that `∀ i ∈ s, p (g i)`. Then `f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i)`. -/
@[to_additive le_sum_of_subadditive_on_pred]
theorem le_prod_of_submultiplicative_on_pred (f : M → N) (p : M → Prop) (h_one : f 1 = 1)
(h_mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y) (hp_mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(g : ι → M) {s : Finset ι} (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, p (g i)) : f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs_nonempty)
· simp [h_one]
· exact le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f p h_mul hp_mul g s hs_nonempty hs
/-- Let `{x | p x}` be a subsemigroup of a commutative additive monoid `M`. Let `f : M → N` be a map
such that `f 0 = 0` and `f` is subadditive on `{x | p x}`, i.e. `p x → p y → f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y`.
Let `g i`, `i ∈ s`, be a finite family of elements of `M` such that `∀ i ∈ s, p (g i)`. Then
`f (∑ x ∈ s, g x) ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, f (g x)`. -/
add_decl_doc le_sum_of_subadditive_on_pred
/-- If `f : M → N` is a submultiplicative function, `f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y`, `f 1 = 1`, and `g i`,
`i ∈ s`, is a finite family of elements of `M`, then `f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i)`. -/
@[to_additive le_sum_of_subadditive]
theorem le_prod_of_submultiplicative (f : M → N) (h_one : f 1 = 1)
(h_mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) ≤ f x * f y) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → M) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
refine le_trans (Multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative f h_one h_mul _) ?_
rw [Multiset.map_map]
rfl
/-- If `f : M → N` is a subadditive function, `f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y`, `f 0 = 0`, and `g i`,
`i ∈ s`, is a finite family of elements of `M`, then `f (∑ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f (g i)`. -/
add_decl_doc le_sum_of_subadditive
variable {f g : ι → N} {s t : Finset ι}
/-- In an ordered commutative monoid, if each factor `f i` of one finite product is less than or
equal to the corresponding factor `g i` of another finite product, then
`∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, g i`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sum_le_sum]
theorem prod_le_prod' (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, g i :=
Multiset.prod_map_le_prod_map f g h
attribute [bound] sum_le_sum
/-- In an ordered additive commutative monoid, if each summand `f i` of one finite sum is less than
or equal to the corresponding summand `g i` of another finite sum, then
`∑ i ∈ s, f i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, g i`. -/
add_decl_doc sum_le_sum
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_prod' (h : ∀ i ∈ s, 1 ≤ f i) : 1 ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
le_trans (by rw [prod_const_one]) (prod_le_prod' h)
@[to_additive Finset.sum_nonneg']
theorem one_le_prod'' (h : ∀ i : ι, 1 ≤ f i) : 1 ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
Finset.one_le_prod' fun i _ ↦ h i
@[to_additive sum_nonpos]
theorem prod_le_one' (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ 1) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ 1 :=
(prod_le_prod' h).trans_eq (by rw [prod_const_one])
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg]
theorem prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' (h : s ⊆ t) (hf : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ s → 1 ≤ f i) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
classical calc
∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ (∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
le_mul_of_one_le_left' <| one_le_prod' <| by simpa only [mem_sdiff, and_imp]
_ = ∏ i ∈ t \ s ∪ s, f i := (prod_union sdiff_disjoint).symm
_ = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by rw [sdiff_union_of_subset h]
@[to_additive sum_mono_set_of_nonneg]
theorem prod_mono_set_of_one_le' (hf : ∀ x, 1 ≤ f x) : Monotone fun s ↦ ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fun _ _ hst ↦ prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' hst fun x _ _ ↦ hf x
@[to_additive sum_le_univ_sum_of_nonneg]
theorem prod_le_univ_prod_of_one_le' [Fintype ι] {s : Finset ι} (w : ∀ x, 1 ≤ f x) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∏ x, f x :=
prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' (subset_univ s) fun a _ _ ↦ w a
@[to_additive sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg]
theorem prod_eq_one_iff_of_one_le' :
(∀ i ∈ s, 1 ≤ f i) → ((∏ i ∈ s, f i) = 1 ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, f i = 1) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s
(fun _ ↦ ⟨fun _ _ h ↦ False.elim (Finset.not_mem_empty _ h), fun _ ↦ rfl⟩) ?_
intro a s ha ih H
have : ∀ i ∈ s, 1 ≤ f i := fun _ ↦ H _ ∘ mem_insert_of_mem
rw [prod_insert ha, mul_eq_one_iff_of_one_le (H _ <| mem_insert_self _ _) (one_le_prod' this),
forall_mem_insert, ih this]
@[to_additive sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonpos]
theorem prod_eq_one_iff_of_le_one' :
(∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ 1) → ((∏ i ∈ s, f i) = 1 ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, f i = 1) :=
prod_eq_one_iff_of_one_le' (N := Nᵒᵈ)
@[to_additive single_le_sum]
theorem single_le_prod' (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 1 ≤ f i) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
calc
f a = ∏ i ∈ {a}, f i := (prod_singleton _ _).symm
_ ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' (singleton_subset_iff.2 h) fun i hi _ ↦ hf i hi
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_le_prod {i j : ι} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 1 ≤ f i) (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (hne : i ≠ j) :
f i * f j ≤ ∏ k ∈ s, f k :=
calc
f i * f j = ∏ k ∈ .cons i {j} (by simpa), f k := by rw [prod_cons, prod_singleton]
_ ≤ ∏ k ∈ s, f k := by
refine prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' ?_ fun k hk _ ↦ hf k hk
simp [cons_subset, *]
@[to_additive sum_le_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_le_pow_card (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → N) (n : N) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ n) :
s.prod f ≤ n ^ #s := by
refine (Multiset.prod_le_pow_card (s.val.map f) n ?_).trans ?_
· simpa using h
· simp
@[to_additive card_nsmul_le_sum]
theorem pow_card_le_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → N) (n : N) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, n ≤ f x) :
n ^ #s ≤ s.prod f := Finset.prod_le_pow_card (N := Nᵒᵈ) _ _ _ h
theorem card_biUnion_le_card_mul [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Finset β) (n : ℕ)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, #(f a) ≤ n) : #(s.biUnion f) ≤ #s * n :=
card_biUnion_le.trans <| sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ h
variable {ι' : Type*} [DecidableEq ι']
@[to_additive sum_fiberwise_le_sum_of_sum_fiber_nonneg]
theorem prod_fiberwise_le_prod_of_one_le_prod_fiber' {t : Finset ι'} {g : ι → ι'} {f : ι → N}
(h : ∀ y ∉ t, (1 : N) ≤ ∏ x ∈ s with g x = y, f x) :
(∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s with g x = y, f x) ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
calc
(∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s with g x = y, f x) ≤
∏ y ∈ t ∪ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s with g x = y, f x :=
prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' subset_union_left fun y _ ↦ h y
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ hx ↦ mem_union.2 <| Or.inr <| mem_image_of_mem _ hx) _
@[to_additive sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos]
theorem prod_le_prod_fiberwise_of_prod_fiber_le_one' {t : Finset ι'} {g : ι → ι'} {f : ι → N}
(h : ∀ y ∉ t, ∏ x ∈ s with g x = y, f x ≤ 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s with g x = y, f x :=
prod_fiberwise_le_prod_of_one_le_prod_fiber' (N := Nᵒᵈ) h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_image_le_of_one_le
{g : ι → ι'} {f : ι' → N} (hf : ∀ u ∈ s.image g, 1 ≤ f u) :
∏ u ∈ s.image g, f u ≤ ∏ u ∈ s, f (g u) := by
rw [prod_comp f g]
refine prod_le_prod' fun a hag ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi, hig⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hag
apply le_self_pow (hf a hag)
rw [← Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, card_pos]
exact ⟨i, mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi, hig⟩⟩
end OrderedCommMonoid
@[to_additive]
lemma max_prod_le [CommMonoid M] [LinearOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M] {f g : ι → M} {s : Finset ι} :
max (s.prod f) (s.prod g) ≤ s.prod (fun i ↦ max (f i) (g i)) :=
Multiset.max_prod_le
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_min_le [CommMonoid M] [LinearOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M] {f g : ι → M} {s : Finset ι} :
s.prod (fun i ↦ min (f i) (g i)) ≤ min (s.prod f) (s.prod g) :=
Multiset.prod_min_le
theorem abs_sum_le_sum_abs {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G]
(f : ι → G) (s : Finset ι) :
|∑ i ∈ s, f i| ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, |f i| := le_sum_of_subadditive _ abs_zero abs_add s f
theorem abs_sum_of_nonneg {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G]
{f : ι → G} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) : |∑ i ∈ s, f i| = ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
theorem abs_sum_of_nonneg' {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [LinearOrder G] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G]
{f : ι → G} {s : Finset ι}
(hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : |∑ i ∈ s, f i| = ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg (Finset.sum_nonneg' hf)]
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [LE α] [MulLeftMono α] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulLECancellable_prod :
MulLECancellable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → MulLECancellable (f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ih <;> simp [*]
end CommMonoid
section Pigeonhole
variable [DecidableEq β]
theorem card_le_mul_card_image_of_maps_to {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β}
(Hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ b ∈ t, #{a ∈ s | f a = b} ≤ n) : #s ≤ n * #t :=
calc
#s = ∑ b ∈ t, #{a ∈ s | f a = b} := card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise Hf
_ ≤ ∑ _b ∈ t, n := sum_le_sum hn
_ = _ := by simp [mul_comm]
theorem card_le_mul_card_image {f : α → β} (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ)
(hn : ∀ b ∈ s.image f, #{a ∈ s | f a = b} ≤ n) : #s ≤ n * #(s.image f) :=
card_le_mul_card_image_of_maps_to (fun _ ↦ mem_image_of_mem _) n hn
theorem mul_card_image_le_card_of_maps_to {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β}
(Hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ b ∈ t, n ≤ #{a ∈ s | f a = b}) :
n * #t ≤ #s :=
calc
n * #t = ∑ _a ∈ t, n := by simp [mul_comm]
_ ≤ ∑ b ∈ t, #{a ∈ s | f a = b} := sum_le_sum hn
_ = #s := by rw [← card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise Hf]
theorem mul_card_image_le_card {f : α → β} (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ)
(hn : ∀ b ∈ s.image f, n ≤ #{a ∈ s | f a = b}) : n * #(s.image f) ≤ #s :=
mul_card_image_le_card_of_maps_to (fun _ ↦ mem_image_of_mem _) n hn
end Pigeonhole
section DoubleCounting
variable [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {B : Finset (Finset α)} {n : ℕ}
/-- If every element belongs to at most `n` Finsets, then the sum of their sizes is at most `n`
times how many they are. -/
theorem sum_card_inter_le (h : ∀ a ∈ s, #{b ∈ B | a ∈ b} ≤ n) : (∑ t ∈ B, #(s ∩ t)) ≤ #s * n := by
refine le_trans ?_ (s.sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ h)
simp_rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, card_eq_sum_ones, sum_filter]
exact sum_comm.le
/-- If every element belongs to at most `n` Finsets, then the sum of their sizes is at most `n`
times how many they are. -/
lemma sum_card_le [Fintype α] (h : ∀ a, #{b ∈ B | a ∈ b} ≤ n) : ∑ s ∈ B, #s ≤ Fintype.card α * n :=
calc
∑ s ∈ B, #s = ∑ s ∈ B, #(univ ∩ s) := by simp_rw [univ_inter]
_ ≤ Fintype.card α * n := sum_card_inter_le fun a _ ↦ h a
/-- If every element belongs to at least `n` Finsets, then the sum of their sizes is at least `n`
times how many they are. -/
theorem le_sum_card_inter (h : ∀ a ∈ s, n ≤ #{b ∈ B | a ∈ b}) : #s * n ≤ ∑ t ∈ B, #(s ∩ t) := by
apply (s.card_nsmul_le_sum _ _ h).trans
simp_rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, card_eq_sum_ones, sum_filter]
exact sum_comm.le
/-- If every element belongs to at least `n` Finsets, then the sum of their sizes is at least `n`
times how many they are. -/
theorem le_sum_card [Fintype α] (h : ∀ a, n ≤ #{b ∈ B | a ∈ b}) :
Fintype.card α * n ≤ ∑ s ∈ B, #s :=
calc
Fintype.card α * n ≤ ∑ s ∈ B, #(univ ∩ s) := le_sum_card_inter fun a _ ↦ h a
_ = ∑ s ∈ B, #s := by simp_rw [univ_inter]
/-- If every element belongs to exactly `n` Finsets, then the sum of their sizes is `n` times how
many they are. -/
theorem sum_card_inter (h : ∀ a ∈ s, #{b ∈ B | a ∈ b} = n) :
(∑ t ∈ B, #(s ∩ t)) = #s * n :=
(sum_card_inter_le fun a ha ↦ (h a ha).le).antisymm (le_sum_card_inter fun a ha ↦ (h a ha).ge)
/-- If every element belongs to exactly `n` Finsets, then the sum of their sizes is `n` times how
many they are. -/
theorem sum_card [Fintype α] (h : ∀ a, #{b ∈ B | a ∈ b} = n) :
∑ s ∈ B, #s = Fintype.card α * n := by
simp_rw [Fintype.card, ← sum_card_inter fun a _ ↦ h a, univ_inter]
theorem card_le_card_biUnion {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Finset α} (hs : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).Nonempty) : #s ≤ #(s.biUnion f) := by
rw [card_biUnion hs, card_eq_sum_ones]
exact sum_le_sum fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).card_pos
theorem card_le_card_biUnion_add_card_fiber {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Finset α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f) : #s ≤ #(s.biUnion f) + #{i ∈ s | f i = ∅} := by
rw [← Finset.filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card fun i ↦ f i = ∅, add_comm]
exact
add_le_add_right
((card_le_card_biUnion (hs.subset <| filter_subset _ _) fun i hi ↦
nonempty_of_ne_empty <| (mem_filter.1 hi).2).trans <|
card_le_card <| biUnion_subset_biUnion_of_subset_left _ <| filter_subset _ _)
_
theorem card_le_card_biUnion_add_one {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Finset α} (hf : Injective f)
(hs : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f) : #s ≤ #(s.biUnion f) + 1 :=
(card_le_card_biUnion_add_card_fiber hs).trans <|
add_le_add_left
(card_le_one.2 fun _ hi _ hj ↦ hf <| (mem_filter.1 hi).2.trans (mem_filter.1 hj).2.symm) _
end DoubleCounting
section CanonicallyOrderedMul
variable [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M] [CanonicallyOrderedMul M]
{f : ι → M} {s t : Finset ι}
/-- In a canonically-ordered monoid, a product bounds each of its terms.
See also `Finset.single_le_prod'`. -/
@[to_additive "In a canonically-ordered additive monoid, a sum bounds each of its terms.
See also `Finset.single_le_sum`."]
lemma _root_.CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid.single_le_prod {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
f i ≤ ∏ j ∈ s, f j :=
single_le_prod' (fun _ _ ↦ one_le _) hi
@[to_additive sum_le_sum_of_subset]
theorem prod_le_prod_of_subset' (h : s ⊆ t) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∏ x ∈ t, f x :=
prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le' h fun _ _ _ ↦ one_le _
@[to_additive sum_mono_set]
theorem prod_mono_set' (f : ι → M) : Monotone fun s ↦ ∏ x ∈ s, f x := fun _ _ hs ↦
prod_le_prod_of_subset' hs
@[to_additive sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero]
theorem prod_le_prod_of_ne_one' (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ t) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∏ x ∈ t, f x := by
classical calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (∏ x ∈ s with f x = 1, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s with f x ≠ 1, f x := by
rw [← prod_union, filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
exact disjoint_filter.2 fun _ _ h n_h ↦ n_h h
_ ≤ ∏ x ∈ t, f x :=
mul_le_of_le_one_of_le
(prod_le_one' <| by simp only [mem_filter, and_imp]; exact fun _ _ ↦ le_of_eq)
(prod_le_prod_of_subset' <| by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_filter, and_imp] )
end CanonicallyOrderedMul
section OrderedCancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M] {f g : ι → M} {s t : Finset ι}
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum]
theorem prod_lt_prod' (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) (hlt : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i < ∏ i ∈ s, g i :=
Multiset.prod_lt_prod' hle hlt
/-- In an ordered commutative monoid, if each factor `f i` of one nontrivial finite product is
strictly less than the corresponding factor `g i` of another nontrivial finite product, then
`s.prod f < s.prod g`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty]
theorem prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty' (hs : s.Nonempty) (hlt : ∀ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i < ∏ i ∈ s, g i :=
Multiset.prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty' (by aesop) hlt
/-- In an ordered additive commutative monoid, if each summand `f i` of one nontrivial finite sum is
strictly less than the corresponding summand `g i` of another nontrivial finite sum, then
`s.sum f < s.sum g`. -/
add_decl_doc sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum_of_subset]
theorem prod_lt_prod_of_subset' (h : s ⊆ t) {i : ι} (ht : i ∈ t) (hs : i ∉ s) (hlt : 1 < f i)
(hle : ∀ j ∈ t, j ∉ s → 1 ≤ f j) : ∏ j ∈ s, f j < ∏ j ∈ t, f j := by
classical calc
∏ j ∈ s, f j < ∏ j ∈ insert i s, f j := by
rw [prod_insert hs]
exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_left' (∏ j ∈ s, f j) hlt
_ ≤ ∏ j ∈ t, f j := by
apply prod_le_prod_of_subset_of_one_le'
· simp [Finset.insert_subset_iff, h, ht]
· intro x hx h'x
simp only [mem_insert, not_or] at h'x
exact hle x hx h'x.2
@[to_additive single_lt_sum]
theorem single_lt_prod' {i j : ι} (hij : j ≠ i) (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (hlt : 1 < f j)
(hle : ∀ k ∈ s, k ≠ i → 1 ≤ f k) : f i < ∏ k ∈ s, f k :=
calc
f i = ∏ k ∈ {i}, f k := by rw [prod_singleton]
_ < ∏ k ∈ s, f k :=
prod_lt_prod_of_subset' (singleton_subset_iff.2 hi) hj (mt mem_singleton.1 hij) hlt
fun k hks hki ↦ hle k hks (mt mem_singleton.2 hki)
@[to_additive sum_pos]
theorem one_lt_prod (h : ∀ i ∈ s, 1 < f i) (hs : s.Nonempty) : 1 < ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (by rw [prod_const_one]) <| prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty' hs h
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_lt_one (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i < 1) (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i < 1 :=
(prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty' hs h).trans_le (by rw [prod_const_one])
@[to_additive sum_pos']
theorem one_lt_prod' (h : ∀ i ∈ s, 1 ≤ f i) (hs : ∃ i ∈ s, 1 < f i) : 1 < ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_const_one.symm.trans_lt <| prod_lt_prod' h hs
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_lt_one' (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ 1) (hs : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < 1) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i < 1 :=
prod_const_one.le.trans_lt' <| prod_lt_prod' h hs
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_iff_of_le {f g : ι → M} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, g i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g i := by
classical
revert h
refine Finset.induction_on s (fun _ ↦ ⟨fun _ _ h ↦ False.elim (Finset.not_mem_empty _ h),
fun _ ↦ rfl⟩) fun a s ha ih H ↦ ?_
specialize ih fun i ↦ H i ∘ Finset.mem_insert_of_mem
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.forall_mem_insert, ← ih]
exact
mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq (H a (s.mem_insert_self a))
(Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i ↦ H i ∘ Finset.mem_insert_of_mem)
variable [DecidableEq ι]
@[to_additive] lemma prod_sdiff_le_prod_sdiff :
∏ i ∈ s \ t, f i ≤ ∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i ↔ ∏ i ∈ s, f i ≤ ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_iff_right, ← prod_union (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter,
← prod_union, inter_comm, sdiff_union_inter]
simpa only [inter_comm] using disjoint_sdiff_inter t s
@[to_additive] lemma prod_sdiff_lt_prod_sdiff :
∏ i ∈ s \ t, f i < ∏ i ∈ t \ s, f i ↔ ∏ i ∈ s, f i < ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← mul_lt_mul_iff_right, ← prod_union (disjoint_sdiff_inter _ _), sdiff_union_inter,
← prod_union, inter_comm, sdiff_union_inter]
simpa only [inter_comm] using disjoint_sdiff_inter t s
| end OrderedCancelCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedCancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] [LinearOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M] {f g : ι → M} {s t : Finset ι}
@[to_additive exists_lt_of_sum_lt]
theorem exists_lt_of_prod_lt' (Hlt : ∏ i ∈ s, f i < ∏ i ∈ s, g i) : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i := by
contrapose! Hlt with Hle
exact prod_le_prod' Hle
@[to_additive exists_le_of_sum_le]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 480 | 491 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Additive
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
/-!
# Box-additive functions defined by measures
In this file we prove a few simple facts about rectangular boxes, partitions, and measures:
- given a box `I : Box ι`, its coercion to `Set (ι → ℝ)` and `I.Icc` are measurable sets;
- if `μ` is a locally finite measure, then `(I : Set (ι → ℝ))` and `I.Icc` have finite measure;
- if `μ` is a locally finite measure, then `fun J ↦ μ.real J` is a box additive function.
For the last statement, we both prove it as a proposition and define a bundled
`BoxIntegral.BoxAdditiveMap` function.
## Tags
rectangular box, measure
-/
open Set
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace BoxIntegral
open MeasureTheory
namespace Box
variable (I : Box ι)
theorem measure_Icc_lt_top (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : μ (Box.Icc I) < ∞ :=
show μ (Icc I.lower I.upper) < ∞ from I.isCompact_Icc.measure_lt_top
theorem measure_coe_lt_top (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : μ I < ∞ :=
(measure_mono <| coe_subset_Icc).trans_lt (I.measure_Icc_lt_top μ)
section Countable
variable [Countable ι]
theorem measurableSet_coe : MeasurableSet (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) := by
rw [coe_eq_pi]
exact MeasurableSet.univ_pi fun i => measurableSet_Ioc
theorem measurableSet_Icc : MeasurableSet (Box.Icc I) :=
_root_.measurableSet_Icc
theorem measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Box.Ioo I) :=
MeasurableSet.univ_pi fun _ => _root_.measurableSet_Ioo
end Countable
variable [Fintype ι]
theorem coe_ae_eq_Icc : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) =ᵐ[volume] Box.Icc I := by
rw [coe_eq_pi]
exact Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc : Box.Ioo I =ᵐ[volume] Box.Icc I :=
Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc
end Box
theorem Prepartition.measure_iUnion_toReal [Finite ι] {I : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I)
(μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] :
μ.real π.iUnion = ∑ J ∈ π.boxes, μ.real J := by
simp only [measureReal_def]
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_sum (fun J _ => (J.measure_coe_lt_top μ).ne), π.iUnion_def]
simp only [← mem_boxes]
rw [measure_biUnion_finset π.pairwiseDisjoint]
exact fun J _ => J.measurableSet_coe
end BoxIntegral
open BoxIntegral BoxIntegral.Box
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
/-- If `μ` is a locally finite measure on `ℝⁿ`, then `fun J ↦ μ.real J` is a box-additive
function. -/
@[simps]
def toBoxAdditive [Finite ι] (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : ι →ᵇᵃ[⊤] ℝ where
toFun J := μ.real J
sum_partition_boxes' J _ π hπ := by rw [← π.measure_iUnion_toReal, hπ.iUnion_eq]
end Measure
end MeasureTheory
namespace BoxIntegral
open MeasureTheory
namespace Box
variable [Fintype ι]
-- This is not a `simp` lemma because the left hand side simplifies already.
-- See `volume_apply'` for the relevant `simp` lemma.
theorem volume_apply (I : Box ι) :
(volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)).toBoxAdditive I = ∏ i, (I.upper i - I.lower i) := by
rw [Measure.toBoxAdditive_apply, coe_eq_pi, measureReal_def,
Real.volume_pi_Ioc_toReal I.lower_le_upper]
@[simp]
theorem volume_apply' (I : Box ι) :
((volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) I).toReal = ∏ i, (I.upper i - I.lower i) := by
| rw [coe_eq_pi, Real.volume_pi_Ioc_toReal I.lower_le_upper]
theorem volume_face_mul {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (I : Box (Fin (n + 1))) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Measure.lean | 121 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jordan Brown, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jordan Brown, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.ViaEmbedding
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
/-!
# Solvable Groups
In this file we introduce the notion of a solvable group. We define a solvable group as one whose
derived series is eventually trivial. This requires defining the commutator of two subgroups and
the derived series of a group.
## Main definitions
* `derivedSeries G n` : the `n`th term in the derived series of `G`, defined by iterating
`general_commutator` starting with the top subgroup
* `IsSolvable G` : the group `G` is solvable
-/
open Subgroup
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] {f : G →* G'}
section derivedSeries
variable (G)
/-- The derived series of the group `G`, obtained by starting from the subgroup `⊤` and repeatedly
taking the commutator of the previous subgroup with itself for `n` times. -/
def derivedSeries : ℕ → Subgroup G
| 0 => ⊤
| n + 1 => ⁅derivedSeries n, derivedSeries n⁆
@[simp]
theorem derivedSeries_zero : derivedSeries G 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem derivedSeries_succ (n : ℕ) :
derivedSeries G (n + 1) = ⁅derivedSeries G n, derivedSeries G n⁆ :=
rfl
theorem derivedSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : (derivedSeries G n).Normal := by
induction n with
| zero => exact (⊤ : Subgroup G).normal_of_characteristic
| succ n ih => exact Subgroup.commutator_normal (derivedSeries G n) (derivedSeries G n)
@[simp 1100]
theorem derivedSeries_one : derivedSeries G 1 = commutator G :=
rfl
end derivedSeries
section CommutatorMap
section DerivedSeriesMap
variable (f) in
theorem map_derivedSeries_le_derivedSeries (n : ℕ) :
(derivedSeries G n).map f ≤ derivedSeries G' n := by
induction n with
| zero => exact le_top
| succ n ih => simp only [derivedSeries_succ, map_commutator, commutator_mono, ih]
theorem derivedSeries_le_map_derivedSeries (hf : Function.Surjective f) (n : ℕ) :
derivedSeries G' n ≤ (derivedSeries G n).map f := by
induction n with
| zero => exact (map_top_of_surjective f hf).ge
| succ n ih => exact commutator_le_map_commutator ih ih
| theorem map_derivedSeries_eq (hf : Function.Surjective f) (n : ℕ) :
(derivedSeries G n).map f = derivedSeries G' n :=
le_antisymm (map_derivedSeries_le_derivedSeries f n) (derivedSeries_le_map_derivedSeries hf n)
end DerivedSeriesMap
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Solvable.lean | 76 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Opposite
/-!
# Calculus of fractions
Following the definitions by [Gabriel and Zisman][gabriel-zisman-1967],
given a morphism property `W : MorphismProperty C` on a category `C`,
we introduce the class `W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions`. The main
result `Localization.exists_leftFraction` is that if `L : C ⥤ D`
is a localization functor for `W`, then for any morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` in `D`,
there exists an auxiliary object `Y' : C` and morphisms `g : X ⟶ Y'` and `s : Y ⟶ Y'`,
with `W s`, such that the given morphism is a sort of fraction `g / s`,
or more precisely of the form `L.map g ≫ (Localization.isoOfHom L W s hs).inv`.
We also show that the functor `L.mapArrow : Arrow C ⥤ Arrow D` is essentially surjective.
Similar results are obtained when `W` has a right calculus of fractions.
## References
* [P. Gabriel, M. Zisman, *Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory*][gabriel-zisman-1967]
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D]
open Category
namespace MorphismProperty
/-- A left fraction from `X : C` to `Y : C` for `W : MorphismProperty C` consists of the
datum of an object `Y' : C` and maps `f : X ⟶ Y'` and `s : Y ⟶ Y'` such that `W s`. -/
structure LeftFraction (W : MorphismProperty C) (X Y : C) where
/-- the auxiliary object of a left fraction -/
{Y' : C}
/-- the numerator of a left fraction -/
f : X ⟶ Y'
/-- the denominator of a left fraction -/
s : Y ⟶ Y'
/-- the condition that the denominator belongs to the given morphism property -/
hs : W s
namespace LeftFraction
variable (W : MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C}
/-- The left fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : X ⟶ Y) [W.ContainsIdentities] :
W.LeftFraction X Y := mk f (𝟙 Y) (W.id_mem Y)
variable {W}
/-- The left fraction from `X` to `Y` given by a morphism `s : Y ⟶ X` such that `W s`. -/
@[simps]
def ofInv (s : Y ⟶ X) (hs : W s) :
W.LeftFraction X Y := mk (𝟙 X) s hs
/-- If `φ : W.LeftFraction X Y` and `L` is a functor which inverts `W`, this is the
induced morphism `L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y` -/
noncomputable def map (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
L.obj X ⟶ L.obj Y :=
have := hL _ φ.hs
L.map φ.f ≫ inv (L.map φ.s)
| @[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_map_s (φ : W.LeftFraction X Y) (L : C ⥤ D) (hL : W.IsInvertedBy L) :
φ.map L hL ≫ L.map φ.s = L.map φ.f := by
letI := hL _ φ.hs
simp [map]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/CalculusOfFractions.lean | 72 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Big operators and `Fin`
Some results about products and sums over the type `Fin`.
The most important results are the induction formulas `Fin.prod_univ_castSucc`
and `Fin.prod_univ_succ`, and the formula `Fin.prod_const` for the product of a
constant function. These results have variants for sums instead of products.
## Main declarations
* `finFunctionFinEquiv`: An explicit equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i = ∏ i : Fin n, f i :=
(Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range _ _).symm
end Finset
namespace Fin
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn (f : Fin n → M) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def (f : Fin n → M) : ∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `1` because `Fin 0` is empty -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero (f : Fin 0 → M) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` times the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove n x, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map, coe_succAboveEmb]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f 0` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succ (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_getElem (l : List M) : ∏ i : Fin l.length, l[i.1] = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get := sum_univ_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get := prod_univ_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_fun_getElem (l : List α) (f : α → M) :
∏ i : Fin l.length, f l[i.1] = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get' := sum_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get' := prod_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → M) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_snoc (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (snoc f x : Fin n.succ → M) i) = (∏ i : Fin n, f i) * x := by
simp [prod_univ_castSucc]
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one (f : Fin 1 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two (f : Fin 2 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' (f : α → M) (a b : α) : ∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three (f : Fin 3 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four (f : Fin 4 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five (f : Fin 5 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_six (f : Fin 6 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_five]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_seven (f : Fin 7 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_six]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_eight (f : Fin 8 → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 * f 7 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_seven]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_const (n : ℕ) (x : M) : ∏ _i : Fin n, x = x ^ n := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioi_zero {v : Fin n.succ → M} :
∏ i ∈ Ioi 0, v i = ∏ j : Fin n, v j.succ := by
rw [Ioi_zero_eq_map, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_Ioi_succ (i : Fin n) (v : Fin n.succ → M) :
∏ j ∈ Ioi i.succ, v j = ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, v j.succ := by
rw [← map_succEmb_Ioi, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_congr' {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin b → M) (h : a = b) :
(∏ i : Fin a, f (i.cast h)) = ∏ i : Fin b, f i := by
subst h
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_add {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = (∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i)) * ∏ i : Fin b, f (natAdd a i) := by
rw [Fintype.prod_equiv finSumFinEquiv.symm f fun i => f (finSumFinEquiv.toFun i)]
· apply Fintype.prod_sum_type
· intro x
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_trunc {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) (hf : ∀ j : Fin b, f (natAdd a j) = 1) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = ∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i) := by
rw [prod_univ_add, Fintype.prod_eq_one _ hf, mul_one]
end CommMonoid
theorem sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (a b : R) :
(∑ s : Finset (Fin n), a ^ s.card * b ^ (n - s.card)) = (a + b) ^ n := by
simpa using Fintype.sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow (Fin n) a b
lemma sum_neg_one_pow (R : Type*) [Ring R] (m : ℕ) :
(∑ n : Fin m, (-1) ^ n.1 : R) = if Even m then 0 else 1 := by
induction m with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_castSucc, Fin.coe_castSucc, IH, Fin.val_last,
Nat.even_add_one, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· simp [*]
· simp [(Nat.not_even_iff_odd.mp h).neg_pow]
section PartialProd
variable [Monoid α] {n : ℕ}
/-- For `f = (a₁, ..., aₙ)` in `αⁿ`, `partialProd f` is `(1, a₁, a₁a₂, ..., a₁...aₙ)` in `αⁿ⁺¹`. -/
@[to_additive "For `f = (a₁, ..., aₙ)` in `αⁿ`, `partialSum f` is\n
`(0, a₁, a₁ + a₂, ..., a₁ + ... + aₙ)` in `αⁿ⁺¹`."]
def partialProd (f : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α :=
((List.ofFn f).take i).prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem partialProd_zero (f : Fin n → α) : partialProd f 0 = 1 := by simp [partialProd]
@[to_additive]
theorem partialProd_succ (f : Fin n → α) (j : Fin n) :
partialProd f j.succ = partialProd f (Fin.castSucc j) * f j := by
simp [partialProd, List.take_succ, List.ofFnNthVal, dif_pos j.is_lt]
@[to_additive]
theorem partialProd_succ' (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) (j : Fin (n + 1)) :
partialProd f j.succ = f 0 * partialProd (Fin.tail f) j := by
simp [partialProd]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem partialProd_left_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (f : Fin (n + 1) → G) :
(f 0 • partialProd fun i : Fin n => (f i)⁻¹ * f i.succ) = f :=
funext fun x => Fin.inductionOn x (by simp) fun x hx => by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul] at hx ⊢
rw [partialProd_succ, ← mul_assoc, hx, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem partialProd_right_inv {G : Type*} [Group G] (f : Fin n → G) (i : Fin n) :
(partialProd f (Fin.castSucc i))⁻¹ * partialProd f i.succ = f i := by
rw [partialProd_succ, inv_mul_cancel_left]
/-- Let `(g₀, g₁, ..., gₙ)` be a tuple of elements in `Gⁿ⁺¹`.
Then if `k < j`, this says `(g₀g₁...gₖ₋₁)⁻¹ * g₀g₁...gₖ = gₖ`.
If `k = j`, it says `(g₀g₁...gₖ₋₁)⁻¹ * g₀g₁...gₖ₊₁ = gₖgₖ₊₁`.
If `k > j`, it says `(g₀g₁...gₖ)⁻¹ * g₀g₁...gₖ₊₁ = gₖ₊₁.`
Useful for defining group cohomology. -/
@[to_additive
"Let `(g₀, g₁, ..., gₙ)` be a tuple of elements in `Gⁿ⁺¹`.
Then if `k < j`, this says `-(g₀ + g₁ + ... + gₖ₋₁) + (g₀ + g₁ + ... + gₖ) = gₖ`.
If `k = j`, it says `-(g₀ + g₁ + ... + gₖ₋₁) + (g₀ + g₁ + ... + gₖ₊₁) = gₖ + gₖ₊₁`.
If `k > j`, it says `-(g₀ + g₁ + ... + gₖ) + (g₀ + g₁ + ... + gₖ₊₁) = gₖ₊₁.`
Useful for defining group cohomology."]
theorem inv_partialProd_mul_eq_contractNth {G : Type*} [Group G] (g : Fin (n + 1) → G)
(j : Fin (n + 1)) (k : Fin n) :
(partialProd g (j.succ.succAbove (Fin.castSucc k)))⁻¹ * partialProd g (j.succAbove k).succ =
j.contractNth (· * ·) g k := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (k : ℕ) j with (h | h | h)
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, partialProd_right_inv,
contractNth_apply_of_lt]
· assumption
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff, le_iff_val_le_val]
exact le_of_lt h
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, succAbove_of_le_castSucc, partialProd_succ,
castSucc_fin_succ, ← mul_assoc,
partialProd_right_inv, contractNth_apply_of_eq]
· simp [le_iff_val_le_val, ← h]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff, le_iff_val_le_val]
exact le_of_eq h
· rwa [succAbove_of_le_castSucc, succAbove_of_le_castSucc, partialProd_succ, partialProd_succ,
castSucc_fin_succ, partialProd_succ, inv_mul_cancel_left, contractNth_apply_of_gt]
· exact le_iff_val_le_val.2 (le_of_lt h)
· rw [le_iff_val_le_val, val_succ]
exact Nat.succ_le_of_lt h
end PartialProd
end Fin
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`. -/
@[simps!]
def finFunctionFinEquiv {m n : ℕ} : (Fin n → Fin m) ≃ Fin (m ^ n) :=
Equiv.ofRightInverseOfCardLE (le_of_eq <| by simp_rw [Fintype.card_fun, Fintype.card_fin])
(fun f => ⟨∑ i, f i * m ^ (i : ℕ), by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
cases m
· exact isEmptyElim (f <| Fin.last _)
simp_rw [Fin.sum_univ_castSucc, Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.val_last]
refine (Nat.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (ih _) <| Nat.mul_le_mul_right _
(Fin.is_le _)).trans_eq ?_
rw [← one_add_mul (_ : ℕ), add_comm, pow_succ']⟩)
(fun a b => ⟨a / m ^ (b : ℕ) % m, by
rcases n with - | n
· exact b.elim0
rcases m with - | m
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at a
exact a.elim0
· exact Nat.mod_lt _ m.succ_pos⟩)
fun a => by
dsimp
induction n with
| zero => subsingleton [(finCongr <| pow_zero _).subsingleton]
| succ n ih =>
simp_rw [Fin.forall_iff, Fin.ext_iff] at ih
ext
simp_rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_succ, pow_zero, Nat.div_one,
mul_one, pow_succ', ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_left_comm _ m, ← mul_sum]
rw [ih _ (Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (a.is_lt.trans_eq (pow_succ' _ _))), Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem finFunctionFinEquiv_apply {m n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → Fin m) :
(finFunctionFinEquiv f : ℕ) = ∑ i : Fin n, ↑(f i) * m ^ (i : ℕ) :=
rfl
theorem finFunctionFinEquiv_single {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (i : Fin n) (j : Fin m) :
(finFunctionFinEquiv (Pi.single i j) : ℕ) = j * m ^ (i : ℕ) := by
rw [finFunctionFinEquiv_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i, Pi.single_eq_same]
rintro x hx
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, Fin.val_zero, zero_mul]
/-- Equivalence between `∀ i : Fin m, Fin (n i)` and `Fin (∏ i : Fin m, n i)`. -/
def finPiFinEquiv {m : ℕ} {n : Fin m → ℕ} : (∀ i : Fin m, Fin (n i)) ≃ Fin (∏ i : Fin m, n i) :=
Equiv.ofRightInverseOfCardLE (le_of_eq <| by simp_rw [Fintype.card_pi, Fintype.card_fin])
(fun f => ⟨∑ i, f i * ∏ j, n (Fin.castLE i.is_lt.le j), by
induction m with
| zero => simp
| succ m ih =>
rw [Fin.prod_univ_castSucc, Fin.sum_univ_castSucc]
suffices
∀ (n : Fin m → ℕ) (nn : ℕ) (f : ∀ i : Fin m, Fin (n i)) (fn : Fin nn),
((∑ i : Fin m, ↑(f i) * ∏ j : Fin i, n (Fin.castLE i.prop.le j)) + ↑fn * ∏ j, n j) <
(∏ i : Fin m, n i) * nn by
replace := this (Fin.init n) (n (Fin.last _)) (Fin.init f) (f (Fin.last _))
rw [← Fin.snoc_init_self f]
simp +singlePass only [← Fin.snoc_init_self n]
simp_rw [Fin.snoc_castSucc, Fin.snoc_last, Fin.snoc_init_self n]
exact this
intro n nn f fn
cases nn
· exact isEmptyElim fn
refine (Nat.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (ih _) <| Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (Fin.is_le _)).trans_eq ?_
rw [← one_add_mul (_ : ℕ), mul_comm, add_comm]⟩)
(fun a b => ⟨(a / ∏ j : Fin b, n (Fin.castLE b.is_lt.le j)) % n b, by
cases m
· exact b.elim0
rcases h : n b with nb | nb
· rw [prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_univ _) h] at a
exact isEmptyElim a
exact Nat.mod_lt _ nb.succ_pos⟩)
(by
intro a; revert a; dsimp only [Fin.val_mk]
refine Fin.consInduction ?_ ?_ n
· intro a
have : Subsingleton (Fin (∏ i : Fin 0, i.elim0)) :=
(finCongr <| prod_empty).subsingleton
subsingleton
· intro n x xs ih a
simp_rw [Fin.forall_iff, Fin.ext_iff] at ih
ext
simp_rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.cons_succ]
have := fun i : Fin n =>
Fintype.prod_equiv (finCongr <| Fin.val_succ i)
(fun j => (Fin.cons x xs : _ → ℕ) (Fin.castLE (Fin.is_lt _).le j))
(fun j => (Fin.cons x xs : _ → ℕ) (Fin.castLE (Nat.succ_le_succ (Fin.is_lt _).le) j))
fun j => rfl
simp_rw [this]
clear this
simp_rw [Fin.val_zero, Fintype.prod_empty, Nat.div_one, mul_one, Fin.cons_zero,
Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.castLE_zero, Fin.cons_zero, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul,
mul_left_comm (_ % _ : ℕ), ← mul_sum]
convert Nat.mod_add_div _ _
exact ih (a / x) (Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| a.is_lt.trans_eq (Fin.prod_univ_succ _)))
theorem finPiFinEquiv_apply {m : ℕ} {n : Fin m → ℕ} (f : ∀ i : Fin m, Fin (n i)) :
(finPiFinEquiv f : ℕ) = ∑ i, f i * ∏ j, n (Fin.castLE i.is_lt.le j) := rfl
theorem finPiFinEquiv_single {m : ℕ} {n : Fin m → ℕ} [∀ i, NeZero (n i)] (i : Fin m)
(j : Fin (n i)) :
(finPiFinEquiv (Pi.single i j : ∀ i : Fin m, Fin (n i)) : ℕ) =
j * ∏ j, n (Fin.castLE i.is_lt.le j) := by
rw [finPiFinEquiv_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i, Pi.single_eq_same]
rintro x hx
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, Fin.val_zero, zero_mul]
/-- Equivalence between the Sigma type `(i : Fin m) × Fin (n i)` and `Fin (∑ i : Fin m, n i)`. -/
def finSigmaFinEquiv {m : ℕ} {n : Fin m → ℕ} : (i : Fin m) × Fin (n i) ≃ Fin (∑ i : Fin m, n i) :=
match m with
| 0 => @Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty _ _ _ (by simp; exact Fin.isEmpty')
| Nat.succ m =>
calc _ ≃ _ := (@finSumFinEquiv m 1).sigmaCongrLeft.symm
_ ≃ _ := Equiv.sumSigmaDistrib _
_ ≃ _ := finSigmaFinEquiv.sumCongr (Equiv.uniqueSigma _)
_ ≃ _ := finSumFinEquiv
_ ≃ _ := finCongr (Fin.sum_univ_castSucc n).symm
@[simp]
theorem finSigmaFinEquiv_apply {m : ℕ} {n : Fin m → ℕ} (k : (i : Fin m) × Fin (n i)) :
(finSigmaFinEquiv k : ℕ) = ∑ i : Fin k.1, n (Fin.castLE k.1.2.le i) + k.2 := by
induction m with
| zero => exact k.fst.elim0
| succ m ih =>
rcases k with ⟨⟨iv, hi⟩, j⟩
rw [finSigmaFinEquiv]
unfold finSumFinEquiv
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Equiv.sigmaCongrLeft, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Equiv.instTrans_trans,
Equiv.trans_apply, finCongr_apply, Fin.coe_cast]
conv =>
enter [1,1,3]
apply Equiv.sumCongr_apply
by_cases him : iv < m
· conv in Sigma.mk _ _ =>
equals ⟨Sum.inl ⟨iv, him⟩, j⟩ => simp [Fin.addCases, him]
simpa using ih _
· replace him := Nat.eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt hi him
subst him
conv in Sigma.mk _ _ =>
equals ⟨Sum.inr 0, j⟩ => simp [Fin.addCases, Fin.natAdd]
simp
rfl
/-- `finSigmaFinEquiv` on `Fin 1 × f` is just `f` -/
theorem finSigmaFinEquiv_one {n : Fin 1 → ℕ} (ij : (i : Fin 1) × Fin (n i)) :
(finSigmaFinEquiv ij : ℕ) = ij.2 := by
rw [finSigmaFinEquiv_apply, add_eq_right]
apply @Finset.sum_of_isEmpty _ _ _ _ (by simpa using Fin.isEmpty')
namespace List
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_take_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) (i : ℕ) :
((ofFn f).take i).prod = ∏ j with j.val < i, f j := by
induction i with
| zero =>
simp
| succ i IH =>
by_cases h : i < n
· have : i < length (ofFn f) := by rwa [length_ofFn]
rw [prod_take_succ _ _ this]
have A : ({j | j.val < i + 1} : Finset (Fin n)) =
insert ⟨i, h⟩ ({j | Fin.val j < i} : Finset (Fin n)) := by
ext ⟨_, _⟩
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
rw [A, prod_insert (by simp), IH, mul_comm]
simp
· have A : (ofFn f).take i = (ofFn f).take i.succ := by
rw [← length_ofFn (f := f)] at h
have : length (ofFn f) ≤ i := not_lt.mp h
rw [take_of_length_le this, take_of_length_le (le_trans this (Nat.le_succ _))]
have B : ∀ j : Fin n, ((j : ℕ) < i.succ) = ((j : ℕ) < i) := by
intro j
have : (j : ℕ) < i := lt_of_lt_of_le j.2 (not_lt.mp h)
simp [this, lt_trans this (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
| simp [← A, B, IH]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α} : (ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i :=
Fin.prod_ofFn f
end CommMonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem alternatingProd_eq_finset_prod {G : Type*} [DivisionCommMonoid G] :
∀ (L : List G), alternatingProd L = ∏ i : Fin L.length, L[i] ^ (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ)
| [] => by
rw [alternatingProd, Finset.prod_eq_one]
rintro ⟨i, ⟨⟩⟩
| g::[] => by
show g = ∏ i : Fin 1, [g][i] ^ (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ)
rw [Fin.prod_univ_succ]; simp
| g::h::L =>
calc g * h⁻¹ * L.alternatingProd
= g * h⁻¹ * ∏ i : Fin L.length, L[i] ^ (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ) :=
congr_arg _ (alternatingProd_eq_finset_prod _)
_ = ∏ i : Fin (L.length + 2), (g::h::L)[i] ^ (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ) := by
{ rw [Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.prod_univ_succ, mul_assoc]
simp [pow_add]}
end List
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 457 | 482 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.RestrictScalars
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of compositions of functions
In this file we prove the chain rule for the following cases:
* `HasDerivAt.comp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → 𝕜'` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasDerivAt.scomp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → E` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt` etc: `f : E → F` composed with `g : 𝕜 → E`;
Here `𝕜` is the base normed field, `E` and `F` are normed spaces over `𝕜` and `𝕜'` is an algebra
over `𝕜` (e.g., `𝕜'=𝕜` or `𝕜=ℝ`, `𝕜'=ℂ`).
We also give versions with the `of_eq` suffix, which require an equality proof instead
of definitional equality of the different points used in the composition. These versions are
often more flexible to use.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`analysis/calculus/deriv/basic`.
## Keywords
derivative, chain rule
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s : Set 𝕜}
variable {L : Filter 𝕜}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of a vector function and a scalar function
We use `scomp` in lemmas on composition of vector valued and scalar valued functions, and `comp`
in lemmas on composition of scalar valued functions, in analogy for `smul` and `mul` (and also
because the `comp` version with the shorter name will show up much more often in applications).
The formula for the derivative involves `smul` in `scomp` lemmas, which can be reduced to
usual multiplication in `comp` lemmas.
-/
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {s' t' : Set 𝕜'} {h : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {h₂ : 𝕜' → 𝕜'} {h' h₂' : 𝕜'}
{g₁ : 𝕜' → F} {g₁' : F} {L' : Filter 𝕜'} {y : 𝕜'} (x)
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh hL).hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hy : y = h x) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') : HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hh.continuousAt, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall hs⟩
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivAt x hh hs
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| hh.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hst
/-- The chain rule. -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh hh.continuousAt
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
HasDerivWithinAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivWithinAt hh (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt x hh
theorem derivWithin.scomp (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' g₁ t' (h x))
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s t') :
derivWithin (g₁ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h s x • derivWithin g₁ t' (h x) := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (HasDerivWithinAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivWithinAt hh.hasDerivWithinAt hs).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
theorem derivWithin.scomp_of_eq (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' g₁ t' y)
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s t')
(hy : y = h x) :
derivWithin (g₁ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h s x • derivWithin g₁ t' (h x) := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact derivWithin.scomp x hg hh hs
theorem deriv.scomp (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' g₁ (h x)) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) :
deriv (g₁ ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g₁ (h x) :=
(HasDerivAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivAt hh.hasDerivAt).deriv
theorem deriv.scomp_of_eq
(hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' g₁ y) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) (hy : y = h x) :
deriv (g₁ ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g₁ (h x) := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact deriv.scomp x hg hh
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of a scalar and vector functions -/
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x) {L'' : Filter E}
(hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' (f x) L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L'')
(hL : Tendsto f L'' L') : HasFDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x L'' := by
convert (hh₂.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hf hL
ext x
simp [mul_comm]
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter_of_eq
{f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x) {L'' : Filter E}
(hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' y L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L'')
(hL : Tendsto f L'' L') (hy : y = f x) : HasFDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x L'' := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hL
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [HasStrictDerivAt] at hh
convert (hh.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hf
ext x
simp [mul_comm]
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hf.continuousAt
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hf.continuousWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s t} (x)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf <| hf.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s t} (x)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' t y) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf hst
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of two scalar functions -/
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x L := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_of_eq (hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x L := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s s') :
HasDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') s x := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh hst
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_of_eq (hh₂ : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh hst
/-- The chain rule.
Note that the function `h₂` is a function on an algebra. If you are looking for the chain rule
with `h₂` taking values in a vector space, use `HasDerivAt.scomp`. -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (h x)) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) :
HasDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x :=
hh₂.comp x hh hh.continuousAt
/-- The chain rule.
Note that the function `h₂` is a function on an algebra. If you are looking for the chain rule
with `h₂` taking values in a vector space, use `HasDerivAt.scomp_of_eq`. -/
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_of_eq
(hh₂ : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp (hh₂ : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' (h x)) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_of_eq
(hh₂ : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt (hh₂ : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') s x :=
hh₂.hasDerivWithinAt.comp x hh (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt_of_eq (hh₂ : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hh
theorem derivWithin_comp (hh₂ : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' h₂ s' (h x))
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s s') :
derivWithin (h₂ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h₂ s' (h x) * derivWithin h s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hh₂.hasDerivWithinAt.comp x hh.hasDerivWithinAt hs).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias derivWithin.comp := derivWithin_comp
theorem derivWithin_comp_of_eq (hh₂ : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' h₂ s' y)
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s s')
(hy : h x = y) :
derivWithin (h₂ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h₂ s' (h x) * derivWithin h s x := by
subst hy; exact derivWithin_comp x hh₂ hh hs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias derivWithin.comp_of_eq := derivWithin_comp_of_eq
theorem deriv_comp (hh₂ : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' h₂ (h x)) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) :
deriv (h₂ ∘ h) x = deriv h₂ (h x) * deriv h x :=
(hh₂.hasDerivAt.comp x hh.hasDerivAt).deriv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias deriv.comp := deriv_comp
theorem deriv_comp_of_eq (hh₂ : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' h₂ y) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x)
(hy : h x = y) :
deriv (h₂ ∘ h) x = deriv h₂ (h x) * deriv h x := by
subst hy; exact deriv_comp x hh₂ hh
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias deriv.comp_of_eq := deriv_comp_of_eq
protected nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.iterate {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' : 𝕜}
(hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : Tendsto f L L) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
HasDerivAtFilter f^[n] (f' ^ n) x L := by
have := hf.iterate hL hx n
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_one_pow] at this
protected nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.iterate {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' : 𝕜} (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x)
(hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) : HasDerivAt f^[n] (f' ^ n) x :=
hf.iterate _ (have := hf.tendsto_nhds le_rfl; by rwa [hx] at this) hx n
protected theorem HasDerivWithinAt.iterate {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' : 𝕜} (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hx : f x = x) (hs : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) : HasDerivWithinAt f^[n] (f' ^ n) s x := by
have := HasFDerivWithinAt.iterate hf hx hs n
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_one_pow] at this
protected nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.iterate {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {f' : 𝕜}
(hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
HasStrictDerivAt f^[n] (f' ^ n) x := by
have := hf.iterate hx n
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_one_pow] at this
end Composition
| section CompositionVector
/-! ### Derivative of the composition of a function between vector spaces and a function on `𝕜` -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Comp.lean | 322 | 325 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
# Theory of Cauchy filters in uniform spaces. Complete uniform spaces. Totally bounded subsets.
-/
universe u v
open Filter Function TopologicalSpace Topology Set UniformSpace Uniformity
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [uniformSpace : UniformSpace α]
/-- A filter `f` is Cauchy if for every entourage `r`, there exists an
`s ∈ f` such that `s × s ⊆ r`. This is a generalization of Cauchy
sequences, because if `a : ℕ → α` then the filter of sets containing
cofinitely many of the `a n` is Cauchy iff `a` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
def Cauchy (f : Filter α) :=
NeBot f ∧ f ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓤 α
/-- A set `s` is called *complete*, if any Cauchy filter `f` such that `s ∈ f`
has a limit in `s` (formally, it satisfies `f ≤ 𝓝 x` for some `x ∈ s`). -/
def IsComplete (s : Set α) :=
∀ f, Cauchy f → f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchy_iff {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ i, p i → ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s i :=
and_congr Iff.rfl <|
(f.basis_sets.prod_self.le_basis_iff h).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
theorem cauchy_iff' {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.cauchy_iff
theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} : Cauchy f ↔ NeBot f ∧ ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
cauchy_iff'.trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq, and_imp, id, forall_mem_comm]
lemma cauchy_iff_le {l : Filter α} [hl : l.NeBot] :
Cauchy l ↔ l ×ˢ l ≤ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [Cauchy, hl, true_and]
theorem Cauchy.ultrafilter_of {l : Filter α} (h : Cauchy l) :
Cauchy (@Ultrafilter.of _ l h.1 : Filter α) := by
haveI := h.1
have := Ultrafilter.of_le l
exact ⟨Ultrafilter.neBot _, (Filter.prod_mono this this).trans h.2⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ NeBot l ∧ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, Tendsto]
theorem cauchy_map_iff' {l : Filter β} [hl : NeBot l] {f : β → α} :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ Tendsto (fun p : β × β => (f p.1, f p.2)) (l ×ˢ l) (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff.trans <| and_iff_right hl
theorem Cauchy.mono {f g : Filter α} [hg : NeBot g] (h_c : Cauchy f) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
⟨hg, le_trans (Filter.prod_mono h_le h_le) h_c.right⟩
theorem Cauchy.mono' {f g : Filter α} (h_c : Cauchy f) (_ : NeBot g) (h_le : g ≤ f) : Cauchy g :=
h_c.mono h_le
theorem cauchy_nhds {a : α} : Cauchy (𝓝 a) :=
⟨nhds_neBot, nhds_prod_eq.symm.trans_le (nhds_le_uniformity a)⟩
theorem cauchy_pure {a : α} : Cauchy (pure a) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono (pure_le_nhds a)
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchy_map {l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Cauchy (map f l) :=
cauchy_nhds.mono h
lemma Cauchy.mono_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} (huv : u ≤ v)
(hF : Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F) : Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F :=
⟨hF.1, hF.2.trans huv⟩
lemma cauchy_inf_uniformSpace {u v : UniformSpace β} {F : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u ⊓ v) F ↔
Cauchy (uniformSpace := u) F ∧ Cauchy (uniformSpace := v) F := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [inf_uniformity (u := u), le_inf_iff, and_and_left]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
unfold Cauchy
rw [iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff, forall_and, forall_const]
lemma cauchy_iInf_uniformSpace' {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace β}
{l : Filter β} [l.NeBot] :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := ⨅ i, u i) l ↔ ∀ i, Cauchy (uniformSpace := u i) l := by
simp_rw [cauchy_iff_le (uniformSpace := _), iInf_uniformity, le_iInf_iff]
lemma cauchy_comap_uniformSpace {u : UniformSpace β} {α} {f : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
Cauchy (uniformSpace := comap f u) l ↔ Cauchy (map f l) := by
simp only [Cauchy, map_neBot_iff, prod_map_map_eq, map_le_iff_le_comap]
rfl
lemma cauchy_prod_iff [UniformSpace β] {F : Filter (α × β)} :
Cauchy F ↔ Cauchy (map Prod.fst F) ∧ Cauchy (map Prod.snd F) := by
simp_rw [instUniformSpaceProd, ← cauchy_comap_uniformSpace, ← cauchy_inf_uniformSpace]
theorem Cauchy.prod [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} (hf : Cauchy f) (hg : Cauchy g) :
Cauchy (f ×ˢ g) := by
have := hf.1; have := hg.1
simpa [cauchy_prod_iff, hf.1] using ⟨hf, hg⟩
/-- The common part of the proofs of `le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp` and
`SequentiallyComplete.le_nhds_of_seq_tendsto_nhds`: if for any entourage `s`
one can choose a set `t ∈ f` of diameter `s` such that it contains a point `y`
with `(x, y) ∈ s`, then `f` converges to `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux {f : Filter α} {x : α}
(adhs : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s ∧ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t) : f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
-- Consider a neighborhood `s` of `x`
intro s hs
-- Take an entourage twice smaller than `s`
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 hs) with ⟨U, U_mem, hU⟩
-- Take a set `t ∈ f`, `t × t ⊆ U`, and a point `y ∈ t` such that `(x, y) ∈ U`
rcases adhs U U_mem with ⟨t, t_mem, ht, y, hxy, hy⟩
apply mem_of_superset t_mem
-- Given a point `z ∈ t`, we have `(x, y) ∈ U` and `(y, z) ∈ t × t ⊆ U`, hence `z ∈ s`
exact fun z hz => hU (prodMk_mem_compRel hxy (ht <| mk_mem_prod hy hz)) rfl
/-- If `x` is an adherent (cluster) point for a Cauchy filter `f`, then it is a limit point
for `f`. -/
theorem le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) (adhs : ClusterPt x f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp_aux
(fun s hs => by
obtain ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩ : ∃ t ∈ f, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s := (cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 s hs
use t, t_mem, ht
exact forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 adhs _ (inter_mem_inf (mem_nhds_left x hs) t_mem))
theorem le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy {f : Filter α} {x : α} (hf : Cauchy f) :
f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ClusterPt x f :=
⟨fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' h hf.1, le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hf⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.map [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : UniformContinuous m) : Cauchy (map m f) :=
⟨hf.1.map _,
calc
map m f ×ˢ map m f = map (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := Filter.prod_map_map_eq
_ ≤ Filter.map (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 α) := map_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 β := hm⟩
nonrec theorem Cauchy.comap [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α) [NeBot (comap m f)] :
Cauchy (comap m f) :=
⟨‹_›,
calc
comap m f ×ˢ comap m f = comap (Prod.map m m) (f ×ˢ f) := prod_comap_comap_eq
_ ≤ comap (Prod.map m m) (𝓤 β) := comap_mono hf.right
_ ≤ 𝓤 α := hm⟩
theorem Cauchy.comap' [UniformSpace β] {f : Filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : Cauchy f)
(hm : Filter.comap (fun p : α × α => (m p.1, m p.2)) (𝓤 β) ≤ 𝓤 α)
(_ : NeBot (Filter.comap m f)) : Cauchy (Filter.comap m f) :=
hf.comap hm
/-- Cauchy sequences. Usually defined on ℕ, but often it is also useful to say that a function
defined on ℝ is Cauchy at +∞ to deduce convergence. Therefore, we define it in a type class that
is general enough to cover both ℕ and ℝ, which are the main motivating examples. -/
def CauchySeq [Preorder β] (u : β → α) :=
Cauchy (atTop.map u)
theorem CauchySeq.tendsto_uniformity [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u) :
Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) := by
simpa only [Tendsto, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using h.right
theorem CauchySeq.nonempty [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : Nonempty β :=
@nonempty_of_neBot _ _ <| (map_neBot_iff _).1 hu.1
theorem CauchySeq.mem_entourage {β : Type*} [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} (h : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ k₀, ∀ i j, k₀ ≤ i → k₀ ≤ j → (u i, u j) ∈ V := by
haveI := h.nonempty
have := h.tendsto_uniformity; rw [← prod_atTop_atTop_eq] at this
simpa [MapsTo] using atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_left_iff.1 this V hV
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cauchySeq [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} {x}
(hx : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) : CauchySeq f :=
hx.cauchy_map
theorem cauchySeq_const [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (x : α) : CauchySeq fun _ : β => x :=
tendsto_const_nhds.cauchySeq
theorem cauchySeq_iff_tendsto [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ Tendsto (Prod.map u u) atTop (𝓤 α) :=
cauchy_map_iff'.trans <| by simp only [prod_atTop_atTop_eq, Prod.map_def]
theorem CauchySeq.comp_tendsto {γ} [Preorder β] [SemilatticeSup γ] [Nonempty γ] {f : β → α}
(hf : CauchySeq f) {g : γ → β} (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) : CauchySeq (f ∘ g) :=
⟨inferInstance, le_trans (prod_le_prod.mpr ⟨Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg, Tendsto.comp le_rfl hg⟩) hf.2⟩
theorem CauchySeq.comp_injective [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] [Nonempty β] {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f : β → ℕ} (hf : Injective f) : CauchySeq (u ∘ f) :=
hu.comp_tendsto <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hf.tendsto_cofinite.mono_left atTop_le_cofinite
theorem Function.Bijective.cauchySeq_comp_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Bijective f) (u : ℕ → α) :
CauchySeq (u ∘ f) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp_injective hf.injective⟩
lift f to ℕ ≃ ℕ using hf
simpa only [Function.comp_def, f.apply_symm_apply] using H.comp_injective f.symm.injective
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (hg : Tendsto g atTop atTop) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, ((u ∘ f ∘ φ) n, (u ∘ g ∘ φ) n) ∈ V n := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto] at hu
exact ((hu.comp <| hf.prod_atTop hg).comp tendsto_atTop_diagonal).subseq_mem hV
-- todo: generalize this and other lemmas to a nonempty semilattice
theorem cauchySeq_iff' {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ k in atTop, k ∈ Prod.map u u ⁻¹' V :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto
theorem cauchySeq_iff {u : ℕ → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ N, (u k, u l) ∈ V := by
simp only [cauchySeq_iff', Filter.eventually_atTop_prod_self', mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
theorem CauchySeq.prodMap {γ δ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] {u : γ → α} {v : δ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq (Prod.map u v) := by
simpa only [CauchySeq, prod_map_map_eq', prod_atTop_atTop_eq] using hu.prod hv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod_map := CauchySeq.prodMap
theorem CauchySeq.prodMk {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {u : γ → α} {v : γ → β}
(hu : CauchySeq u) (hv : CauchySeq v) : CauchySeq fun x => (u x, v x) :=
haveI := hu.1.of_map
(Cauchy.prod hu hv).mono (tendsto_map.prodMk tendsto_map)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias CauchySeq.prod := CauchySeq.prodMk
theorem CauchySeq.eventually_eventually [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ∀ᶠ l in atTop, (u k, u l) ∈ V :=
eventually_atTop_curry <| hu.tendsto_uniformity hV
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_cauchySeq {γ} [UniformSpace β] [Preorder γ] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) {u : γ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) : CauchySeq (f ∘ u) :=
hu.map hf
theorem CauchySeq.subseq_mem {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : CauchySeq u) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ ∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V n := by
have : ∀ n, ∃ N, ∀ k ≥ N, ∀ l ≥ k, (u l, u k) ∈ V n := fun n => by
rw [cauchySeq_iff] at hu
rcases hu _ (hV n) with ⟨N, H⟩
exact ⟨N, fun k hk l hl => H _ (le_trans hk hl) _ hk⟩
obtain ⟨φ : ℕ → ℕ, φ_extr : StrictMono φ, hφ : ∀ n, ∀ l ≥ φ n, (u l, u <| φ n) ∈ V n⟩ :=
extraction_forall_of_eventually' this
exact ⟨φ, φ_extr, fun n => hφ _ _ (φ_extr <| Nat.lt_add_one n).le⟩
theorem Filter.Tendsto.subseq_mem_entourage {V : ℕ → Set (α × α)} (hV : ∀ n, V n ∈ 𝓤 α) {u : ℕ → α}
{a : α} (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) : ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ (u (φ 0), a) ∈ V 0 ∧
∀ n, (u <| φ (n + 1), u <| φ n) ∈ V (n + 1) := by
rcases mem_atTop_sets.1 (hu (ball_mem_nhds a (symm_le_uniformity <| hV 0))) with ⟨n, hn⟩
rcases (hu.comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat n)).cauchySeq.subseq_mem fun n => hV (n + 1) with
⟨φ, φ_mono, hφV⟩
exact ⟨fun k => φ k + n, φ_mono.add_const _, hn _ le_add_self, hφV⟩
/-- If a Cauchy sequence has a convergent subsequence, then it converges. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_cauchySeq_of_subseq [Preorder β] {u : β → α} (hu : CauchySeq u)
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} {p : Filter ι} [NeBot p] (hf : Tendsto f p atTop) {a : α}
(ha : Tendsto (u ∘ f) p (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_cauchy_adhp hu (ha.mapClusterPt.of_comp hf)
/-- Any shift of a Cauchy sequence is also a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_shift {u : ℕ → α} (k : ℕ) : CauchySeq (fun n ↦ u (n + k)) ↔ CauchySeq u := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [cauchySeq_iff] at h ⊢
intro V mV
obtain ⟨N, h⟩ := h V mV
use N + k
intro a ha b hb
convert h (a - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le ha) (b - k) (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le hb) <;> omega
· exact h.comp_tendsto (tendsto_add_atTop_nat k)
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {p : γ → Prop}
{s : γ → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → (u m, u n) ∈ s i := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto, ← prod_atTop_atTop_eq]
refine (atTop_basis.prod_self.tendsto_iff h).trans ?_
simp only [exists_prop, true_and, MapsTo, preimage, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_prod_eq,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_Ici, and_imp, Prod.map, @forall_swap (_ ≤ _) β]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.cauchySeq_iff' {γ} [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α}
{p : γ → Prop} {s : γ → Set (α × α)} (H : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, (u n, u N) ∈ s i := by
refine H.cauchySeq_iff.trans ⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· exact (h i hi).imp fun N hN n hn => hN n hn N le_rfl
· rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity (H.mem_of_mem hi) with ⟨t, ht, ht', hts⟩
rcases H.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨j, hj, hjt⟩
refine (h j hj).imp fun N hN m hm n hn => hts ⟨u N, hjt ?_, ht' <| hjt ?_⟩
exacts [hN m hm, hN n hn]
theorem cauchySeq_of_controlled [SemilatticeSup β] [Nonempty β] (U : β → Set (α × α))
(hU : ∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ n, U n ⊆ s) {f : β → α}
(hf : ∀ ⦃N m n : β⦄, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → (f m, f n) ∈ U N) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_iff_tendsto.2
(by
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, mem_atTop_sets]
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hU s hs
refine ⟨(N, N), fun mn hmn => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨m, n⟩ := mn
exact hN (hf hmn.1 hmn.2))
theorem isComplete_iff_clusterPt {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l, Cauchy l → l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l :=
forall₃_congr fun _ hl _ => exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ =>
le_nhds_iff_adhp_of_cauchy hl
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ↑l ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine ⟨fun h l => h l, fun H => isComplete_iff_clusterPt.2 fun l hl hls => ?_⟩
haveI := hl.1
rcases H (Ultrafilter.of l) hl.ultrafilter_of ((Ultrafilter.of_le l).trans hls) with ⟨x, hxs, hxl⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, (ClusterPt.of_le_nhds hxl).mono (Ultrafilter.of_le l)⟩
theorem isComplete_iff_ultrafilter' {s : Set α} :
IsComplete s ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → s ∈ l → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
isComplete_iff_ultrafilter.trans <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
protected theorem IsComplete.union {s t : Set α} (hs : IsComplete s) (ht : IsComplete t) :
IsComplete (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [isComplete_iff_ultrafilter', Ultrafilter.union_mem_iff, or_imp] at *
exact fun l hl =>
⟨fun hsl => (hs l hl hsl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inl hx.1, hx.2⟩, fun htl =>
(ht l hl htl).imp fun x hx => ⟨Or.inr hx.1, hx.2⟩⟩
theorem isComplete_iUnion_separated {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, IsComplete (s i))
{U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) (hd : ∀ (i j : ι), ∀ x ∈ s i, ∀ y ∈ s j, (x, y) ∈ U → i = j) :
IsComplete (⋃ i, s i) := by
set S := ⋃ i, s i
intro l hl hls
rw [le_principal_iff] at hls
obtain ⟨hl_ne, hl'⟩ := cauchy_iff.1 hl
obtain ⟨t, htS, htl, htU⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ S ∧ t ∈ l ∧ t ×ˢ t ⊆ U := by
rcases hl' U hU with ⟨t, htl, htU⟩
refine ⟨t ∩ S, inter_subset_right, inter_mem htl hls, Subset.trans ?_ htU⟩
gcongr <;> apply inter_subset_left
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, t ⊆ s i := by
rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem htl with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hx) with ⟨i, hi⟩
refine ⟨i, fun y hy => ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (htS hy) with ⟨j, hj⟩
rwa [hd i j x hi y hj (htU <| mk_mem_prod hx hy)]
rcases hs i l hl (le_principal_iff.2 <| mem_of_superset htl hi) with ⟨x, hxs, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, hxs⟩, hlx⟩
/-- A complete space is defined here using uniformities. A uniform space
is complete if every Cauchy filter converges. -/
class CompleteSpace (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Prop where
/-- In a complete uniform space, every Cauchy filter converges. -/
complete : ∀ {f : Filter α}, Cauchy f → ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x
theorem complete_univ {α : Type u} [UniformSpace α] [CompleteSpace α] :
IsComplete (univ : Set α) := fun f hf _ => by
rcases CompleteSpace.complete hf with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_univ x, hx⟩
instance CompleteSpace.prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace α] [CompleteSpace β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x1, hx1⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_fst
let ⟨x2, hx2⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.map uniformContinuous_snd
⟨(x1, x2), by rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod]; constructor <;> assumption⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.fst_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace α where
complete hf :=
let ⟨y⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| hf.prod <| cauchy_pure (a := y)
⟨a, by simpa only [map_fst_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.fst) hab⟩
lemma CompleteSpace.snd_of_prod [UniformSpace β] [CompleteSpace (α × β)] [h : Nonempty α] :
CompleteSpace β where
complete hf :=
let ⟨x⟩ := h
let ⟨(a, b), hab⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete <| (cauchy_pure (a := x)).prod hf
⟨b, by simpa only [map_snd_prod, nhds_prod_eq] using map_mono (m := Prod.snd) hab⟩
lemma completeSpace_prod_of_nonempty [UniformSpace β] [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] :
CompleteSpace (α × β) ↔ CompleteSpace α ∧ CompleteSpace β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨.fst_of_prod (β := β), .snd_of_prod (α := α)⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ .prod⟩
@[to_additive]
instance CompleteSpace.mulOpposite [CompleteSpace α] : CompleteSpace αᵐᵒᵖ where
complete hf :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.exists.mpr <|
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := CompleteSpace.complete (hf.map MulOpposite.uniformContinuous_unop)
⟨x, (map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hx).trans_eq <| MulOpposite.comap_unop_nhds _⟩
/-- If `univ` is complete, the space is a complete space -/
theorem completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ (h : IsComplete (univ : Set α)) : CompleteSpace α :=
⟨fun hf => let ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := h _ hf ((@principal_univ α).symm ▸ le_top); ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ : CompleteSpace α ↔ IsComplete (univ : Set α) :=
⟨@complete_univ α _, completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ⟩
theorem completeSpace_iff_ultrafilter :
CompleteSpace α ↔ ∀ l : Ultrafilter α, Cauchy (l : Filter α) → ∃ x : α, ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, isComplete_iff_ultrafilter]
theorem cauchy_iff_exists_le_nhds [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy l ↔ ∃ x, l ≤ 𝓝 x :=
| ⟨CompleteSpace.complete, fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => cauchy_nhds.mono hx⟩
theorem cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto [CompleteSpace α] {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} [NeBot l] :
Cauchy (l.map f) ↔ ∃ x, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Cauchy.lean | 415 | 418 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,339 | 2,340 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
/-!
# Results about division in extended non-negative reals
This file establishes basic properties related to the inversion and division operations on `ℝ≥0∞`.
For instance, as a consequence of being a `DivInvOneMonoid`, `ℝ≥0∞` inherits a power operation
with integer exponent.
## Main results
A few order isomorphisms are worthy of mention:
- `OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ`: The map `x ↦ x⁻¹` as an order isomorphism to the dual.
- `orderIsoIicOneBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)`: The birational order isomorphism between
`ℝ≥0∞` and the unit interval `Set.Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` given by `x ↦ (x⁻¹ + 1)⁻¹` with inverse
`x ↦ (x⁻¹ - 1)⁻¹`
- `orderIsoIicCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Iic (a : ℝ≥0∞) ≃o Iic a`: Order isomorphism between an initial
interval in `ℝ≥0∞` and an initial interval in `ℝ≥0` given by the identity map.
- `orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`: An order isomorphism between
the extended nonnegative real numbers and the unit interval. This is `orderIsoIicOneBirational`
composed with the identity order isomorphism between `Iic (1 : ℝ≥0∞)` and `Icc (0 : ℝ) 1`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by
simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hr, coe_one]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel₀ h0
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) :
a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b := by
obtain rfl | ha₀ := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_left (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (a⁻¹ * b) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_left' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b * b⁻¹ = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_inv_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b⁻¹ * b = a := by
obtain rfl | hb₀ := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp_all
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b ⊤
· simp_all
· simp [mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, *]
/-- See `ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma inv_mul_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right` for a simpler version assuming `b ≠ 0`, `b ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right' (hb₀ : b = 0 → a = 0) (hb : b = ∞ → a = 0) :
a * b / b = a := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel_right' hb₀ hb
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel_right (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a * b / b = a :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel_right' (by simp [hb₀]) (by simp [hb])
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel_right' ha₀ ha
/-- See `ENNReal.div_mul_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma div_mul_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b :=
ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel` for a simpler version assuming `a ≠ 0`, `a ≠ ∞`. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel' (ha₀ : a = 0 → b = 0) (ha : a = ∞ → b = 0) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel' ha₀ ha]
/-- See `ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'` for a stronger version. -/
protected lemma mul_div_cancel (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b :=
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (by simp [ha₀]) (by simp [ha])
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
@[aesop (rule_sets := [finiteness]) safe apply]
protected alias ⟨_, Finiteness.inv_ne_top⟩ := ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1.lt_top (inv_ne_top.mpr h2).lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
protected theorem inv_mul_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ 0) (h2 : x ≠ ∞) :
x⁻¹ * y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ x * z := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_left h1 h2, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h1 h2, one_mul]
protected theorem mul_inv_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x * y⁻¹ ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.inv_mul_le_iff h1 h2, mul_comm]
protected theorem div_le_iff {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ z * y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem div_le_iff' {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : y ≠ 0) (h2 : y ≠ ∞) :
x / y ≤ z ↔ x ≤ y * z := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_le_iff h1 h2]
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
protected theorem inv_div {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (htop : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) (hzero : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ 0) :
(a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_zero] at htop
rw [← ENNReal.inv_ne_top] at hzero
rw [ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, ENNReal.mul_inv htop hzero, mul_comm, inv_inv]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
/-- The inverse map `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is an order isomorphism between `ℝ≥0∞` and its `OrderDual` -/
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
@[simp] protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
@[simp] protected lemma mul_inv_le_one (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a * a⁻¹ ≤ 1 := ENNReal.div_self_le_one
@[simp] protected lemma inv_mul_le_one (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a⁻¹ * a ≤ 1 := by simp [mul_comm]
@[simp] lemma mul_inv_ne_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a * a⁻¹ ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top one_ne_top a.mul_inv_le_one
@[simp] lemma inv_mul_ne_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a⁻¹ * a ≠ ⊤ := by simp [mul_comm]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
@[simp 900]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] <;>
· right
simp
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div (hab : a ≤ b) (hdc : d ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / d :=
div_eq_mul_inv b d ▸ div_eq_mul_inv a c ▸ mul_le_mul' hab (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mpr hdc)
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
ENNReal.div_le_div le_rfl h
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
ENNReal.div_le_div h le_rfl
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h), ← mul_assoc, h,
one_mul]
rintro rfl
simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h] at h
theorem mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b := by
rw [← @ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁,
one_mul]
theorem le_of_forall_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
refine le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense fun r hr => ?_
lift r to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt hr
exact h r hr
lemma eq_of_forall_nnreal_iff {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x ↔ ↑r ≤ y) : x = y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun _r hr ↦ (h _).1 hr.le)
(le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun _r hr ↦ (h _).2 hr.le)
theorem le_of_forall_pos_nnreal_lt {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r → ↑r < x → ↑r ≤ y) : x ≤ y :=
le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r hr =>
(zero_le r).eq_or_lt.elim (fun h => h ▸ zero_le _) fun h0 => h r h0 hr
theorem eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le {x : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ r : ℝ≥0, ↑r ≤ x) : x = ∞ :=
top_unique <| le_of_forall_nnreal_lt fun r _ => h r
protected theorem add_div : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c :=
right_distrib a b c⁻¹
protected theorem div_add_div_same {a b c : ℝ≥0∞} : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
ENNReal.add_div.symm
protected theorem div_self (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a / a = 1 :=
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 hI
theorem mul_div_le : a * (b / a) ≤ b :=
mul_le_of_le_div' le_rfl
theorem eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) : b = c / a ↔ a * b = c :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel ha ha'], fun h => by
rw [← h, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel ha ha']⟩
protected theorem div_eq_div_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) (ha' : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b ≠ ∞) :
c / b = d / a ↔ a * c = b * d := by
rw [eq_div_iff ha ha']
conv_rhs => rw [eq_comm]
rw [← eq_div_iff hb hb', mul_div_assoc, eq_comm]
theorem div_eq_one_iff {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb₀ : b ≠ 0) (hb₁ : b ≠ ∞) : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← (eq_div_iff hb₀ hb₁).mp h.symm, mul_one], fun h =>
h.symm ▸ ENNReal.div_self hb₀ hb₁⟩
theorem inv_two_add_inv_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [← two_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.div_self two_ne_zero ofNat_ne_top]
theorem inv_three_add_inv_three : (3 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ + 3⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel three_ne_zero ofNat_ne_top]
ring
@[simp]
protected theorem add_halves (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, inv_two_add_inv_two, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem add_thirds (a : ℝ≥0∞) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, inv_three_add_inv_three, mul_one]
@[simp] theorem div_eq_zero_iff : a / b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
| @[simp] theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, not_or]
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 489 | 489 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.