Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 896 | 900 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Co-Heyting boundary
The boundary of an element of a co-Heyting algebra is the intersection of its Heyting negation with
itself. The boundary in the co-Heyting algebra of closed sets coincides with the topological
boundary.
## Main declarations
* `Coheyting.boundary`: Co-Heyting boundary. `Coheyting.boundary a = a ⊓ ￢a`
## Notation
`∂ a` is notation for `Coheyting.boundary a` in locale `Heyting`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Coheyting
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
/-- The boundary of an element of a co-Heyting algebra is the intersection of its Heyting negation
with itself. Note that this is always `⊥` for a boolean algebra. -/
def boundary (a : α) : α :=
a ⊓ ￢a
/-- The boundary of an element of a co-Heyting algebra. -/
scoped[Heyting] prefix:120 "∂ " => Coheyting.boundary
open Heyting
-- TODO: Should hnot be named hNot?
theorem inf_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊓ ￢a = ∂ a :=
rfl
theorem boundary_le : ∂ a ≤ a :=
inf_le_left
theorem boundary_le_hnot : ∂ a ≤ ￢a :=
inf_le_right
@[simp]
theorem boundary_bot : ∂ (⊥ : α) = ⊥ := bot_inf_eq _
@[simp]
theorem boundary_top : ∂ (⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [boundary, hnot_top, inf_bot_eq]
theorem boundary_hnot_le (a : α) : ∂ (￢a) ≤ ∂ a :=
(inf_comm _ _).trans_le <| inf_le_inf_right _ hnot_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem boundary_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ∂ (￢￢a) = ∂ (￢a) := by
simp_rw [boundary, hnot_hnot_hnot, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_boundary (a : α) : ￢∂ a = ⊤ := by rw [boundary, hnot_inf_distrib, sup_hnot_self]
/-- **Leibniz rule** for the co-Heyting boundary. -/
theorem boundary_inf (a b : α) : ∂ (a ⊓ b) = ∂ a ⊓ b ⊔ a ⊓ ∂ b := by
unfold boundary
rw [hnot_inf_distrib, inf_sup_left, inf_right_comm, ← inf_assoc]
theorem boundary_inf_le : ∂ (a ⊓ b) ≤ ∂ a ⊔ ∂ b :=
(boundary_inf _ _).trans_le <| sup_le_sup inf_le_left inf_le_right
theorem boundary_sup_le : ∂ (a ⊔ b) ≤ ∂ a ⊔ ∂ b := by
rw [boundary, inf_sup_right]
exact
sup_le_sup (inf_le_inf_left _ <| hnot_anti le_sup_left)
(inf_le_inf_left _ <| hnot_anti le_sup_right)
/- The intuitionistic version of `Coheyting.boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left`. Either
proof can be obtained from the other using the equivalence of Heyting algebras and intuitionistic
logic and duality between Heyting and co-Heyting algebras. It is crucial that the following proof be
intuitionistic. -/
example (a b : Prop) : (a ∧ b ∨ ¬(a ∧ b)) ∧ ((a ∨ b) ∨ ¬(a ∨ b)) → a ∨ ¬a := by
rintro ⟨⟨ha, _⟩ | hnab, (ha | hb) | hnab⟩ <;> try exact Or.inl ha
| · exact Or.inr fun ha => hnab ⟨ha, hb⟩
· exact Or.inr fun ha => hnab <| Or.inl ha
theorem boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left : ∂ a ≤ ∂ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ ∂ (a ⊓ b) := by
simp only [boundary, sup_inf_left, sup_inf_right, sup_right_idem, le_inf_iff, sup_assoc,
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Boundary.lean | 89 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
| rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 324 | 325 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sean Leather. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.AList
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Finite maps over `Multiset`
-/
universe u v w
open List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### Multisets of sigma types -/
namespace Multiset
/-- Multiset of keys of an association multiset. -/
def keys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Multiset α :=
s.map Sigma.fst
@[simp]
theorem coe_keys {l : List (Sigma β)} : keys (l : Multiset (Sigma β)) = (l.keys : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_zero : keys (0 : Multiset (Sigma β)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Multiset (Sigma β)} :
keys (⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ keys s := by
simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton {a : α} {b : β a} : keys ({⟨a, b⟩} : Multiset (Sigma β)) = {a} := rfl
/-- `NodupKeys s` means that `s` has no duplicate keys. -/
def NodupKeys (s : Multiset (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.NodupKeys fun _ _ p => propext <| perm_nodupKeys p
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodupKeys {l : List (Sigma β)} : @NodupKeys α β l ↔ l.NodupKeys :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nodup_keys {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} : m.keys.Nodup ↔ m.NodupKeys := by
rcases m with ⟨l⟩; rfl
alias ⟨_, NodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩ := nodup_keys
protected lemma NodupKeys.nodup {m : Multiset (Σ a, β a)} (h : m.NodupKeys) : m.Nodup :=
h.nodup_keys.of_map _
end Multiset
/-! ### Finmap -/
/-- `Finmap β` is the type of finite maps over a multiset. It is effectively
a quotient of `AList β` by permutation of the underlying list. -/
structure Finmap (β : α → Type v) : Type max u v where
/-- The underlying `Multiset` of a `Finmap` -/
entries : Multiset (Sigma β)
/-- There are no duplicate keys in `entries` -/
nodupKeys : entries.NodupKeys
/-- The quotient map from `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def AList.toFinmap (s : AList β) : Finmap β :=
⟨s.entries, s.nodupKeys⟩
local notation:arg "⟦" a "⟧" => AList.toFinmap a
theorem AList.toFinmap_eq {s₁ s₂ : AList β} :
toFinmap s₁ = toFinmap s₂ ↔ s₁.entries ~ s₂.entries := by
cases s₁
cases s₂
simp [AList.toFinmap]
@[simp]
theorem AList.toFinmap_entries (s : AList β) : ⟦s⟧.entries = s.entries :=
rfl
/-- Given `l : List (Sigma β)`, create a term of type `Finmap β` by removing
entries with duplicate keys. -/
def List.toFinmap [DecidableEq α] (s : List (Sigma β)) : Finmap β :=
s.toAList.toFinmap
namespace Finmap
open AList
lemma nodup_entries (f : Finmap β) : f.entries.Nodup := f.nodupKeys.nodup
/-! ### Lifting from AList -/
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on `AList` to `Finmap`. -/
def liftOn {γ} (s : Finmap β) (f : AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a b : AList β, a.entries ~ b.entries → f a = f b) : γ := by
refine
(Quotient.liftOn s.entries
(fun (l : List (Sigma β)) => (⟨_, fun nd => f ⟨l, nd⟩⟩ : Part γ))
(fun l₁ l₂ p => Part.ext' (perm_nodupKeys p) ?_) : Part γ).get ?_
· exact fun h1 h2 => H _ _ p
· have := s.nodupKeys
revert this
rcases s.entries with ⟨l⟩
exact id
@[simp]
theorem liftOn_toFinmap {γ} (s : AList β) (f : AList β → γ) (H) : liftOn ⟦s⟧ f H = f s := by
cases s
rfl
/-- Lift a permutation-respecting function on 2 `AList`s to 2 `Finmap`s. -/
def liftOn₂ {γ} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ)
(H : ∀ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : AList β,
a₁.entries ~ a₂.entries → b₁.entries ~ b₂.entries → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂) : γ :=
liftOn s₁ (fun l₁ => liftOn s₂ (f l₁) fun _ _ p => H _ _ _ _ (Perm.refl _) p) fun a₁ a₂ p => by
have H' : f a₁ = f a₂ := funext fun _ => H _ _ _ _ p (Perm.refl _)
simp only [H']
@[simp]
theorem liftOn₂_toFinmap {γ} (s₁ s₂ : AList β) (f : AList β → AList β → γ) (H) :
liftOn₂ ⟦s₁⟧ ⟦s₂⟧ f H = f s₁ s₂ := by
cases s₁; cases s₂; rfl
/-! ### Induction -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : Finmap β → Prop} (s : Finmap β) (H : ∀ a : AList β, C ⟦a⟧) : C s := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩; exact H ⟨a, h⟩
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {C : Finmap β → Finmap β → Prop} (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β)
(H : ∀ a₁ a₂ : AList β, C ⟦a₁⟧ ⟦a₂⟧) : C s₁ s₂ :=
induction_on s₁ fun l₁ => induction_on s₂ fun l₂ => H l₁ l₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₃ {C : Finmap β → Finmap β → Finmap β → Prop} (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finmap β)
(H : ∀ a₁ a₂ a₃ : AList β, C ⟦a₁⟧ ⟦a₂⟧ ⟦a₃⟧) : C s₁ s₂ s₃ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun l₁ l₂ => induction_on s₃ fun l₃ => H l₁ l₂ l₃
/-! ### extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {s t : Finmap β}, s.entries = t.entries → s = t
| ⟨l₁, h₁⟩, ⟨l₂, _⟩, H => by congr
@[simp]
theorem ext_iff' {s t : Finmap β} : s.entries = t.entries ↔ s = t :=
Finmap.ext_iff.symm
/-! ### mem -/
/-- The predicate `a ∈ s` means that `s` has a value associated to the key `a`. -/
instance : Membership α (Finmap β) :=
⟨fun s a => a ∈ s.entries.keys⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.entries.keys :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinmap {a : α} {s : AList β} : a ∈ toFinmap s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
/-! ### keys -/
/-- The set of keys of a finite map. -/
def keys (s : Finmap β) : Finset α :=
⟨s.entries.keys, s.nodupKeys.nodup_keys⟩
@[simp]
theorem keys_val (s : AList β) : (keys ⟦s⟧).val = s.keys :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem keys_ext {s₁ s₂ : AList β} : keys ⟦s₁⟧ = keys ⟦s₂⟧ ↔ s₁.keys ~ s₂.keys := by
simp [keys, AList.keys]
theorem mem_keys {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ s.keys ↔ a ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.mem_keys
/-! ### empty -/
/-- The empty map. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Finmap β) :=
⟨⟨0, nodupKeys_nil⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (Finmap β) :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_toFinmap : (⟦∅⟧ : Finmap β) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinmap_nil [DecidableEq α] : ([].toFinmap : Finmap β) = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem not_mem_empty {a : α} : a ∉ (∅ : Finmap β) :=
Multiset.not_mem_zero a
@[simp]
theorem keys_empty : (∅ : Finmap β).keys = ∅ :=
rfl
/-! ### singleton -/
/-- The singleton map. -/
def singleton (a : α) (b : β a) : Finmap β :=
⟦AList.singleton a b⟧
@[simp]
theorem keys_singleton (a : α) (b : β a) : (singleton a b).keys = {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton (x y : α) (b : β y) : x ∈ singleton y b ↔ x = y := by
simp [singleton, mem_def]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
instance decidableEq [∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] : DecidableEq (Finmap β)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ Finmap.ext_iff.symm
/-! ### lookup -/
/-- Look up the value associated to a key in a map. -/
def lookup (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Option (β a) :=
liftOn s (AList.lookup a) fun _ _ => perm_lookup
@[simp]
theorem lookup_toFinmap (a : α) (s : AList β) : lookup a ⟦s⟧ = s.lookup a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_list_toFinmap (a : α) (s : List (Sigma β)) : lookup a s.toFinmap = s.dlookup a := by
rw [List.toFinmap, lookup_toFinmap, lookup_to_alist]
@[simp]
theorem lookup_empty (a) : lookup a (∅ : Finmap β) = none :=
rfl
theorem lookup_isSome {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : (s.lookup a).isSome ↔ a ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.lookup_isSome
theorem lookup_eq_none {a} {s : Finmap β} : lookup a s = none ↔ a ∉ s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.lookup_eq_none
lemma mem_lookup_iff {s : Finmap β} {a : α} {b : β a} :
b ∈ s.lookup a ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ s.entries := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨l⟩, hl⟩; exact List.mem_dlookup_iff hl
lemma lookup_eq_some_iff {s : Finmap β} {a : α} {b : β a} :
s.lookup a = b ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ s.entries := mem_lookup_iff
@[simp] lemma sigma_keys_lookup (s : Finmap β) :
s.keys.sigma (fun i => (s.lookup i).toFinset) = ⟨s.entries, s.nodup_entries⟩ := by
ext x
have : x ∈ s.entries → x.1 ∈ s.keys := Multiset.mem_map_of_mem _
simpa [lookup_eq_some_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lookup_singleton_eq {a : α} {b : β a} : (singleton a b).lookup a = some b := by
rw [singleton, lookup_toFinmap, AList.singleton, AList.lookup, dlookup_cons_eq]
instance (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ lookup_isSome
theorem mem_iff {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ s ↔ ∃ b, s.lookup a = some b :=
induction_on s fun s =>
Iff.trans List.mem_keys <| exists_congr fun _ => (mem_dlookup_iff s.nodupKeys).symm
theorem mem_of_lookup_eq_some {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Finmap β} (h : s.lookup a = some b) : a ∈ s :=
mem_iff.mpr ⟨_, h⟩
theorem ext_lookup {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : (∀ x, s₁.lookup x = s₂.lookup x) → s₁ = s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun s₁ s₂ h => by
simp only [AList.lookup, lookup_toFinmap] at h
rw [AList.toFinmap_eq]
apply lookup_ext s₁.nodupKeys s₂.nodupKeys
intro x y
rw [h]
/-- An equivalence between `Finmap β` and pairs `(keys : Finset α, lookup : ∀ a, Option (β a))` such
that `(lookup a).isSome ↔ a ∈ keys`. -/
@[simps apply_coe_fst apply_coe_snd]
def keysLookupEquiv :
Finmap β ≃ { f : Finset α × (∀ a, Option (β a)) // ∀ i, (f.2 i).isSome ↔ i ∈ f.1 } where
toFun s := ⟨(s.keys, fun i => s.lookup i), fun _ => lookup_isSome⟩
invFun f := mk (f.1.1.sigma fun i => (f.1.2 i).toFinset).val <| by
refine Multiset.nodup_keys.1 ((Finset.nodup _).map_on ?_)
simp only [Finset.mem_val, Finset.mem_sigma, Option.mem_toFinset, Option.mem_def]
rintro ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ (rfl : i = j)
simpa using hx.symm.trans hy
left_inv f := ext <| by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨(s, f), hf⟩ => by
dsimp only at hf
ext
· simp [keys, Multiset.keys, ← hf, Option.isSome_iff_exists]
· simp +contextual [lookup_eq_some_iff, ← hf]
@[simp] lemma keysLookupEquiv_symm_apply_keys :
∀ f : {f : Finset α × (∀ a, Option (β a)) // ∀ i, (f.2 i).isSome ↔ i ∈ f.1},
(keysLookupEquiv.symm f).keys = f.1.1 :=
keysLookupEquiv.surjective.forall.2 fun _ => by
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply, keysLookupEquiv_apply_coe_fst]
@[simp] lemma keysLookupEquiv_symm_apply_lookup :
∀ (f : {f : Finset α × (∀ a, Option (β a)) // ∀ i, (f.2 i).isSome ↔ i ∈ f.1}) a,
(keysLookupEquiv.symm f).lookup a = f.1.2 a :=
keysLookupEquiv.surjective.forall.2 fun _ _ => by
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply, keysLookupEquiv_apply_coe_snd]
/-! ### replace -/
/-- Replace a key with a given value in a finite map.
If the key is not present it does nothing. -/
def replace (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => AList.toFinmap (AList.replace a b t))
fun _ _ p => toFinmap_eq.2 <| perm_replace p
@[simp]
theorem replace_toFinmap (a : α) (b : β a) (s : AList β) :
replace a b ⟦s⟧ = (⟦s.replace a b⟧ : Finmap β) := by
simp [replace]
@[simp]
theorem keys_replace (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) : (replace a b s).keys = s.keys :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_replace {a a' : α} {b : β a} {s : Finmap β} : a' ∈ replace a b s ↔ a' ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
end
/-! ### foldl -/
/-- Fold a commutative function over the key-value pairs in the map -/
def foldl {δ : Type w} (f : δ → ∀ a, β a → δ)
(H : ∀ d a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂, f (f d a₁ b₁) a₂ b₂ = f (f d a₂ b₂) a₁ b₁) (d : δ) (m : Finmap β) : δ :=
letI : RightCommutative fun d (s : Sigma β) ↦ f d s.1 s.2 := ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ H _ _ _ _ _⟩
m.entries.foldl (fun d s => f d s.1 s.2) d
/-- `any f s` returns `true` iff there exists a value `v` in `s` such that `f v = true`. -/
def any (f : ∀ x, β x → Bool) (s : Finmap β) : Bool :=
s.foldl (fun x y z => x || f y z)
(fun _ _ _ _ => by simp_rw [Bool.or_assoc, Bool.or_comm, imp_true_iff]) false
/-- `all f s` returns `true` iff `f v = true` for all values `v` in `s`. -/
def all (f : ∀ x, β x → Bool) (s : Finmap β) : Bool :=
s.foldl (fun x y z => x && f y z)
(fun _ _ _ _ => by simp_rw [Bool.and_assoc, Bool.and_comm, imp_true_iff]) true
/-! ### erase -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Erase a key from the map. If the key is not present it does nothing. -/
def erase (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => AList.toFinmap (AList.erase a t)) fun _ _ p => toFinmap_eq.2 <| perm_erase p
@[simp]
theorem erase_toFinmap (a : α) (s : AList β) : erase a ⟦s⟧ = AList.toFinmap (s.erase a) := by
simp [erase]
@[simp]
theorem keys_erase_toFinset (a : α) (s : AList β) : keys ⟦s.erase a⟧ = (keys ⟦s⟧).erase a := by
simp [Finset.erase, keys, AList.erase, keys_kerase]
@[simp]
theorem keys_erase (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : (erase a s).keys = s.keys.erase a :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_erase {a a' : α} {s : Finmap β} : a' ∈ erase a s ↔ a' ≠ a ∧ a' ∈ s :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp
theorem not_mem_erase_self {a : α} {s : Finmap β} : ¬a ∈ erase a s := by
rw [mem_erase, not_and_or, not_not]
left
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lookup_erase (a) (s : Finmap β) : lookup a (erase a s) = none :=
induction_on s <| AList.lookup_erase a
@[simp]
theorem lookup_erase_ne {a a'} {s : Finmap β} (h : a ≠ a') : lookup a (erase a' s) = lookup a s :=
induction_on s fun _ => AList.lookup_erase_ne h
theorem erase_erase {a a' : α} {s : Finmap β} : erase a (erase a' s) = erase a' (erase a s) :=
induction_on s fun s => ext (by simp only [AList.erase_erase, erase_toFinmap])
/-! ### sdiff -/
/-- `sdiff s s'` consists of all key-value pairs from `s` and `s'` where the keys are in `s` or
`s'` but not both. -/
def sdiff (s s' : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
s'.foldl (fun s x _ => s.erase x) (fun _ _ _ _ _ => erase_erase) s
instance : SDiff (Finmap β) :=
⟨sdiff⟩
/-! ### insert -/
/-- Insert a key-value pair into a finite map, replacing any existing pair with
the same key. -/
def insert (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => AList.toFinmap (AList.insert a b t)) fun _ _ p =>
toFinmap_eq.2 <| perm_insert p
@[simp]
theorem insert_toFinmap (a : α) (b : β a) (s : AList β) :
insert a b (AList.toFinmap s) = AList.toFinmap (s.insert a b) := by
simp [insert]
theorem entries_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} {b : β a} {s : Finmap β} :
a ∉ s → (insert a b s).entries = ⟨a, b⟩ ::ₘ s.entries :=
induction_on s fun s h => by
simp [AList.entries_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_toFinmap.1 h), -entries_insert]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-14")] alias insert_entries_of_neg := entries_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert {a a' : α} {b' : β a'} {s : Finmap β} : a ∈ insert a' b' s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s :=
induction_on s AList.mem_insert
@[simp]
theorem lookup_insert {a} {b : β a} (s : Finmap β) : lookup a (insert a b s) = some b :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp only [insert_toFinmap, lookup_toFinmap, AList.lookup_insert]
@[simp]
theorem lookup_insert_of_ne {a a'} {b : β a} (s : Finmap β) (h : a' ≠ a) :
lookup a' (insert a b s) = lookup a' s :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp only [insert_toFinmap, lookup_toFinmap, lookup_insert_ne h]
@[simp]
theorem insert_insert {a} {b b' : β a} (s : Finmap β) :
(s.insert a b).insert a b' = s.insert a b' :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp only [insert_toFinmap, AList.insert_insert]
theorem insert_insert_of_ne {a a'} {b : β a} {b' : β a'} (s : Finmap β) (h : a ≠ a') :
(s.insert a b).insert a' b' = (s.insert a' b').insert a b :=
induction_on s fun s => by
simp only [insert_toFinmap, AList.toFinmap_eq, AList.insert_insert_of_ne _ h]
theorem toFinmap_cons (a : α) (b : β a) (xs : List (Sigma β)) :
List.toFinmap (⟨a, b⟩ :: xs) = insert a b xs.toFinmap :=
rfl
theorem mem_list_toFinmap (a : α) (xs : List (Sigma β)) :
a ∈ xs.toFinmap ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with x xs
· simp only [toFinmap_nil, not_mem_empty, find?, not_mem_nil, exists_false]
obtain ⟨fst_i, snd_i⟩ := x
simp only [toFinmap_cons, *, exists_or, mem_cons, mem_insert, exists_and_left, Sigma.mk.inj_iff]
refine (or_congr_left <| and_iff_left_of_imp ?_).symm
rintro rfl
simp only [exists_eq, heq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem insert_singleton_eq {a : α} {b b' : β a} : insert a b (singleton a b') = singleton a b := by
simp only [singleton, Finmap.insert_toFinmap, AList.insert_singleton_eq]
/-! ### extract -/
/-- Erase a key from the map, and return the corresponding value, if found. -/
def extract (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : Option (β a) × Finmap β :=
(liftOn s fun t => Prod.map id AList.toFinmap (AList.extract a t)) fun s₁ s₂ p => by
simp [perm_lookup p, toFinmap_eq, perm_erase p]
@[simp]
theorem extract_eq_lookup_erase (a : α) (s : Finmap β) : extract a s = (lookup a s, erase a s) :=
induction_on s fun s => by simp [extract]
/-! ### union -/
/-- `s₁ ∪ s₂` is the key-based union of two finite maps. It is left-biased: if
there exists an `a ∈ s₁`, `lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂) = lookup a s₁`. -/
def union (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) : Finmap β :=
(liftOn₂ s₁ s₂ fun s₁ s₂ => (AList.toFinmap (s₁ ∪ s₂))) fun _ _ _ _ p₁₃ p₂₄ =>
toFinmap_eq.mpr <| perm_union p₁₃ p₂₄
instance : Union (Finmap β) :=
⟨union⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => AList.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem union_toFinmap (s₁ s₂ : AList β) : (toFinmap s₁) ∪ (toFinmap s₂) = toFinmap (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simp [(· ∪ ·), union]
theorem keys_union {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : (s₁ ∪ s₂).keys = s₁.keys ∪ s₂.keys :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun s₁ s₂ => Finset.ext <| by simp [keys]
@[simp]
theorem lookup_union_left {a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : a ∈ s₁ → lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂) = lookup a s₁ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => AList.lookup_union_left
@[simp]
theorem lookup_union_right {a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : a ∉ s₁ → lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂) = lookup a s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => AList.lookup_union_right
theorem lookup_union_left_of_not_in {a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂) = lookup a s₁ := by
by_cases h' : a ∈ s₁
· rw [lookup_union_left h']
· rw [lookup_union_right h', lookup_eq_none.mpr h, lookup_eq_none.mpr h']
/-- `simp`-normal form of `mem_lookup_union` -/
@[simp]
theorem mem_lookup_union' {a} {b : β a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} :
lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂) = some b ↔ b ∈ lookup a s₁ ∨ a ∉ s₁ ∧ b ∈ lookup a s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => AList.mem_lookup_union
theorem mem_lookup_union {a} {b : β a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} :
b ∈ lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ b ∈ lookup a s₁ ∨ a ∉ s₁ ∧ b ∈ lookup a s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => AList.mem_lookup_union
theorem mem_lookup_union_middle {a} {b : β a} {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finmap β} :
b ∈ lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₃) → a ∉ s₂ → b ∈ lookup a (s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃) :=
induction_on₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ fun _ _ _ => AList.mem_lookup_union_middle
theorem insert_union {a} {b : β a} {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : insert a b (s₁ ∪ s₂) = insert a b s₁ ∪ s₂ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun a₁ a₂ => by simp [AList.insert_union]
theorem union_assoc {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finmap β} : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) :=
induction_on₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ fun s₁ s₂ s₃ => by
simp only [AList.toFinmap_eq, union_toFinmap, AList.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem empty_union {s₁ : Finmap β} : ∅ ∪ s₁ = s₁ :=
induction_on s₁ fun s₁ => by
rw [← empty_toFinmap]
simp [-empty_toFinmap, AList.toFinmap_eq, union_toFinmap, AList.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem union_empty {s₁ : Finmap β} : s₁ ∪ ∅ = s₁ :=
induction_on s₁ fun s₁ => by
rw [← empty_toFinmap]
simp [-empty_toFinmap, AList.toFinmap_eq, union_toFinmap, AList.union_assoc]
theorem erase_union_singleton (a : α) (b : β a) (s : Finmap β) (h : s.lookup a = some b) :
s.erase a ∪ singleton a b = s :=
ext_lookup fun x => by
by_cases h' : x = a
· subst a
rw [lookup_union_right not_mem_erase_self, lookup_singleton_eq, h]
· have : x ∉ singleton a b := by rwa [mem_singleton]
rw [lookup_union_left_of_not_in this, lookup_erase_ne h']
end
/-! ### Disjoint -/
/-- `Disjoint s₁ s₂` holds if `s₁` and `s₂` have no keys in common. -/
def Disjoint (s₁ s₂ : Finmap β) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s₁, ¬x ∈ s₂
theorem disjoint_empty (x : Finmap β) : Disjoint ∅ x :=
nofun
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm (x y : Finmap β) (h : Disjoint x y) : Disjoint y x := fun p hy hx => h p hx hy
theorem Disjoint.symm_iff (x y : Finmap β) : Disjoint x y ↔ Disjoint y x :=
⟨Disjoint.symm x y, Disjoint.symm y x⟩
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
instance : DecidableRel (@Disjoint α β) := fun x y => by dsimp only [Disjoint]; infer_instance
theorem disjoint_union_left (x y z : Finmap β) :
Disjoint (x ∪ y) z ↔ Disjoint x z ∧ Disjoint y z := by
simp [Disjoint, Finmap.mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem disjoint_union_right (x y z : Finmap β) :
Disjoint x (y ∪ z) ↔ Disjoint x y ∧ Disjoint x z := by
rw [Disjoint.symm_iff, disjoint_union_left, Disjoint.symm_iff _ x, Disjoint.symm_iff _ x]
theorem union_comm_of_disjoint {s₁ s₂ : Finmap β} : Disjoint s₁ s₂ → s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ :=
induction_on₂ s₁ s₂ fun s₁ s₂ => by
intro h
simp only [AList.toFinmap_eq, union_toFinmap, AList.union_comm_of_disjoint h]
theorem union_cancel {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finmap β} (h : Disjoint s₁ s₃) (h' : Disjoint s₂ s₃) :
s₁ ∪ s₃ = s₂ ∪ s₃ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
⟨fun h'' => by
apply ext_lookup
intro x
have : (s₁ ∪ s₃).lookup x = (s₂ ∪ s₃).lookup x := h'' ▸ rfl
by_cases hs₁ : x ∈ s₁
· rwa [lookup_union_left hs₁, lookup_union_left_of_not_in (h _ hs₁)] at this
· by_cases hs₂ : x ∈ s₂
· rwa [lookup_union_left_of_not_in (h' _ hs₂), lookup_union_left hs₂] at this
· rw [lookup_eq_none.mpr hs₁, lookup_eq_none.mpr hs₂], fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
end
end Finmap
| Mathlib/Data/Finmap.lean | 669 | 671 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.PUnit
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Stalks
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Functors
/-!
# Skyscraper (pre)sheaves
A skyscraper (pre)sheaf `𝓕 : (Pre)Sheaf C X` is the (pre)sheaf with value `A` at point `p₀` that is
supported only at open sets contain `p₀`, i.e. `𝓕(U) = A` if `p₀ ∈ U` and `𝓕(U) = *` if `p₀ ∉ U`
where `*` is a terminal object of `C`. In terms of stalks, `𝓕` is supported at all specializations
of `p₀`, i.e. if `p₀ ⤳ x` then `𝓕ₓ ≅ A` and if `¬ p₀ ⤳ x` then `𝓕ₓ ≅ *`.
## Main definitions
* `skyscraperPresheaf`: `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` is the skyscraper presheaf at point `p₀` with
value `A`.
* `skyscraperSheaf`: the skyscraper presheaf satisfies the sheaf condition.
## Main statements
* `skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes`: if `y ∈ closure {p₀}` then the stalk of
`skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `A`.
* `skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes`: if `y ∉ closure {p₀}` then the stalk of
`skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `*` the terminal object.
TODO: generalize universe level when calculating stalks, after generalizing universe level of stalk.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace TopCat CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
universe u v w
variable {X : TopCat.{u}} (p₀ : X) [∀ U : Opens X, Decidable (p₀ ∈ U)]
section
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{w} C] [HasTerminal C] (A : C)
/-- A skyscraper presheaf is a presheaf supported at a single point: if `p₀ ∈ X` is a specified
point, then the skyscraper presheaf `𝓕` with value `A` is defined by `U ↦ A` if `p₀ ∈ U` and
`U ↦ *` if `p₀ ∉ A` where `*` is some terminal object.
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheaf : Presheaf C X where
obj U := if p₀ ∈ unop U then A else terminal C
map {U V} i :=
if h : p₀ ∈ unop V then eqToHom <| by rw [if_pos h, if_pos (by simpa using i.unop.le h)]
else ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).from _
map_id U :=
(em (p₀ ∈ U.unop)).elim (fun h => dif_pos h) fun h =>
((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext _ _
map_comp {U V W} iVU iWV := by
by_cases hW : p₀ ∈ unop W
· have hV : p₀ ∈ unop V := leOfHom iWV.unop hW
simp only [dif_pos hW, dif_pos hV, eqToHom_trans]
· dsimp; rw [dif_neg hW]; apply ((if_neg hW).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext
theorem skyscraperPresheaf_eq_pushforward
[hd : ∀ U : Opens (TopCat.of PUnit.{u + 1}), Decidable (PUnit.unit ∈ U)] :
skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A =
(ofHom (ContinuousMap.const (TopCat.of PUnit) p₀)) _*
skyscraperPresheaf (X := TopCat.of PUnit) PUnit.unit A := by
convert_to @skyscraperPresheaf X p₀ (fun U => hd <| (Opens.map <| ofHom <|
ContinuousMap.const _ p₀).obj U)
C _ _ A = _ <;> congr
/-- Taking skyscraper presheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps]
def SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' {a b : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
skyscraperPresheaf p₀ a ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ b where
app U :=
if h : p₀ ∈ U.unop then eqToHom (if_pos h) ≫ f ≫ eqToHom (if_pos h).symm
else ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).from _
naturality U V i := by
simp only [skyscraperPresheaf_map]
by_cases hV : p₀ ∈ V.unop
· have hU : p₀ ∈ U.unop := leOfHom i.unop hV
simp only [skyscraperPresheaf_obj, hU, hV, ↓reduceDIte, eqToHom_trans_assoc, Category.assoc,
eqToHom_trans]
· apply ((if_neg hV).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext
theorem SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_id {a : C} :
SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ (𝟙 a) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext U
simp only [SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_app, NatTrans.id_app]; split_ifs <;> aesop_cat
theorem SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_comp {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ (f ≫ g) =
SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ f ≫ SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀ g := by
ext U
simp only [SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_app, NatTrans.comp_app]
split_ifs with h <;> aesop_cat
/-- Taking skyscraper presheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheafFunctor : C ⥤ Presheaf C X where
obj := skyscraperPresheaf p₀
map := SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map' p₀
map_id _ := SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_id p₀
map_comp := SkyscraperPresheafFunctor.map'_comp p₀
end
section
-- In this section, we calculate the stalks for skyscraper presheaves.
-- We need to restrict universe level.
variable {C : Type v} [Category.{u} C] (A : C) [HasTerminal C]
/-- The cocone at `A` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∈ closure {p₀}`
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
Cocone ((OpenNhds.inclusion y).op ⋙ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A) where
pt := A
ι :=
{ app := fun U => eqToHom <| if_pos <| h.mem_open U.unop.1.2 U.unop.2
naturality := fun U V inc => by
change dite _ _ _ ≫ _ = _; rw [dif_pos]
swap
· exact h.mem_open V.unop.1.2 V.unop.2
· simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Functor.op_obj, skyscraperPresheaf_obj, unop_op,
Functor.const_obj_obj, eqToHom_trans, Functor.const_obj_map, Category.comp_id] }
/--
The cocone at `A` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∈ closure {p₀}` is a
colimit
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfSpecializes {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
IsColimit (skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes p₀ A h) where
desc c := eqToHom (if_pos trivial).symm ≫ c.ι.app (op ⊤)
fac c U := by
dsimp
rw [← c.w (homOfLE <| (le_top : unop U ≤ _)).op]
change _ ≫ _ ≫ dite _ _ _ ≫ _ = _
rw [dif_pos]
· simp only [skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes_ι_app, eqToHom_trans_assoc,
eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp, unop_op, op_unop]
· exact h.mem_open U.unop.1.2 U.unop.2
uniq c f h := by
dsimp
rw [← h, skyscraperPresheafCoconeOfSpecializes_ι_app, eqToHom_trans_assoc, eqToHom_refl,
Category.id_comp]
/-- If `y ∈ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is `A`.
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) :
(skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).stalk y ≅ A :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfSpecializes p₀ A h⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma germ_skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes_hom [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : p₀ ⤳ y) (U hU) :
(skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).germ U y hU ≫
(skyscraperPresheafStalkOfSpecializes p₀ A h).hom = eqToHom (if_pos (h.mem_open U.2 hU)) :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom _ _
/-- The cocone at `*` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∉ closure {p₀}`
-/
@[simps]
def skyscraperPresheafCocone (y : X) :
Cocone ((OpenNhds.inclusion y).op ⋙ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A) where
pt := terminal C
ι :=
{ app := fun _ => terminal.from _
naturality := fun _ _ _ => terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext _ _ }
/--
The cocone at `*` for the stalk functor of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` when `y ∉ closure {p₀}` is a
colimit
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfNotSpecializes {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) :
IsColimit (skyscraperPresheafCocone p₀ A y) :=
let h1 : ∃ U : OpenNhds y, p₀ ∉ U.1 :=
let ⟨U, ho, h₀, hy⟩ := not_specializes_iff_exists_open.mp h
⟨⟨⟨U, ho⟩, h₀⟩, hy⟩
{ desc := fun c => eqToHom (if_neg h1.choose_spec).symm ≫ c.ι.app (op h1.choose)
fac := fun c U => by
change _ = c.ι.app (op U.unop)
simp only [← c.w (homOfLE <| @inf_le_left _ _ h1.choose U.unop).op, ←
c.w (homOfLE <| @inf_le_right _ _ h1.choose U.unop).op, ← Category.assoc]
congr 1
refine ((if_neg ?_).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext _ _
exact fun h => h1.choose_spec h.1
uniq := fun c f H => by
dsimp
rw [← Category.id_comp f, ← H, ← Category.assoc]
congr 1; apply terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext }
/-- If `y ∉ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is isomorphic to a
terminal object.
-/
noncomputable def skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) :
(skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).stalk y ≅ terminal C :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, skyscraperPresheafCoconeIsColimitOfNotSpecializes _ A h⟩
/-- If `y ∉ closure {p₀}`, then the stalk of `skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A` at `y` is a terminal object
-/
def skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializesIsTerminal [HasColimits C] {y : X} (h : ¬p₀ ⤳ y) :
IsTerminal ((skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).stalk y) :=
IsTerminal.ofIso terminalIsTerminal <| (skyscraperPresheafStalkOfNotSpecializes _ _ h).symm
theorem skyscraperPresheaf_isSheaf : (skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A).IsSheaf := by
classical exact
(Presheaf.isSheaf_iso_iff (eqToIso <| skyscraperPresheaf_eq_pushforward p₀ A)).mpr <|
(Sheaf.pushforward_sheaf_of_sheaf _
(Presheaf.isSheaf_on_punit_of_isTerminal _ (by
dsimp [skyscraperPresheaf]
rw [if_neg]
· exact terminalIsTerminal
· #adaptation_note /-- 2024-03-24
Previously the universe annotation was not needed here. -/
exact Set.not_mem_empty PUnit.unit.{u+1})))
/--
The skyscraper presheaf supported at `p₀` with value `A` is the sheaf that assigns `A` to all opens
`U` that contain `p₀` and assigns `*` otherwise.
-/
def skyscraperSheaf : Sheaf C X :=
⟨skyscraperPresheaf p₀ A, skyscraperPresheaf_isSheaf _ _⟩
/-- Taking skyscraper sheaf at a point is functorial: `c ↦ skyscraper p₀ c` defines a functor by
sending every `f : a ⟶ b` to the natural transformation `α` defined as: `α(U) = f : a ⟶ b` if
`p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object in `C` if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
def skyscraperSheafFunctor : C ⥤ Sheaf C X where
obj c := skyscraperSheaf p₀ c
map f := Sheaf.Hom.mk <| (skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀).map f
map_id _ := Sheaf.Hom.ext <| (skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀).map_id _
map_comp _ _ := Sheaf.Hom.ext <| (skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀).map_comp _ _
namespace StalkSkyscraperPresheafAdjunctionAuxs
variable [HasColimits C]
/-- If `f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c`, then a natural transformation `𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c` can be
defined by: `𝓕.germ p₀ ≫ f : 𝓕(U) ⟶ c` if `p₀ ∈ U` and the unique morphism to a terminal object
if `p₀ ∉ U`.
-/
@[simps]
def toSkyscraperPresheaf {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c) :
𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c where
app U :=
if h : p₀ ∈ U.unop then 𝓕.germ _ p₀ h ≫ f ≫ eqToHom (if_pos h).symm
else ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).from _
naturality U V inc := by
dsimp
by_cases hV : p₀ ∈ V.unop
· have hU : p₀ ∈ U.unop := leOfHom inc.unop hV
split_ifs
rw [← Category.assoc, 𝓕.germ_res' inc, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans]
· split_ifs
exact ((if_neg hV).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext ..
/-- If `f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c` is a natural transformation, then there is a morphism
`𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c` defined as the morphism from colimit to cocone at `c`.
-/
def fromStalk {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c) : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c :=
let χ : Cocone ((OpenNhds.inclusion p₀).op ⋙ 𝓕) :=
Cocone.mk c <|
{ app := fun U => f.app ((OpenNhds.inclusion p₀).op.obj U) ≫ eqToHom (if_pos U.unop.2)
naturality := fun U V inc => by
dsimp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Functor.const_obj_obj, Functor.comp_map,
Functor.comp_obj, Functor.op_obj, skyscraperPresheaf_obj]
rw [Category.comp_id, ← Category.assoc, comp_eqToHom_iff, Category.assoc,
eqToHom_trans, f.naturality, skyscraperPresheaf_map]
have hV : p₀ ∈ (OpenNhds.inclusion p₀).obj V.unop := V.unop.2
simp only [dif_pos hV] }
colimit.desc _ χ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma germ_fromStalk {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c) (U) (hU) :
𝓕.germ U p₀ hU ≫ fromStalk p₀ f = f.app (op U) ≫ eqToHom (if_pos hU) :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
theorem to_skyscraper_fromStalk {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕 ⟶ skyscraperPresheaf p₀ c) :
toSkyscraperPresheaf p₀ (fromStalk _ f) = f := by
apply NatTrans.ext
ext U
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· rw [← Category.assoc, germ_fromStalk, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl,
Category.comp_id]
· exact ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext ..
theorem fromStalk_to_skyscraper {𝓕 : Presheaf C X} {c : C} (f : 𝓕.stalk p₀ ⟶ c) :
fromStalk p₀ (toSkyscraperPresheaf _ f) = f := by
refine 𝓕.stalk_hom_ext fun U hxU ↦ ?_
rw [germ_fromStalk, toSkyscraperPresheaf_app, dif_pos hxU, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, Presheaf.germ]
/-- The unit in `Presheaf.stalkFunctor ⊣ skyscraperPresheafFunctor`
-/
@[simps]
protected def unit :
𝟭 (Presheaf C X) ⟶ Presheaf.stalkFunctor C p₀ ⋙ skyscraperPresheafFunctor p₀ where
app _ := toSkyscraperPresheaf _ <| 𝟙 _
| naturality 𝓕 𝓖 f := by
ext U; dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans_assoc, eqToHom_refl,
Presheaf.stalkFunctor_map_germ_assoc, Presheaf.stalkFunctor_obj]
· apply ((if_neg h).symm.ndrec terminalIsTerminal).hom_ext
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Skyscraper.lean | 311 | 317 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
/-! # Right-exactness properties of tensor product
## Modules
* `LinearMap.rTensor_surjective` asserts that when one tensors
a surjective map on the right, one still gets a surjective linear map.
More generally, `LinearMap.rTensor_range` computes the range of
`LinearMap.rTensor`
* `LinearMap.lTensor_surjective` asserts that when one tensors
a surjective map on the left, one still gets a surjective linear map.
More generally, `LinearMap.lTensor_range` computes the range of
`LinearMap.lTensor`
* `TensorProduct.rTensor_exact` says that when one tensors a short exact
sequence on the right, one still gets a short exact sequence
(right-exactness of `TensorProduct.rTensor`),
and `rTensor.equiv` gives the LinearEquiv that follows from this
combined with `LinearMap.rTensor_surjective`.
* `TensorProduct.lTensor_exact` says that when one tensors a short exact
sequence on the left, one still gets a short exact sequence
(right-exactness of `TensorProduct.rTensor`)
and `lTensor.equiv` gives the LinearEquiv that follows from this
combined with `LinearMap.lTensor_surjective`.
* For `N : Submodule R M`, `LinearMap.exact_subtype_mkQ N` says that
the inclusion of the submodule and the quotient map form an exact pair,
and `lTensor_mkQ` compute `ker (lTensor Q (N.mkQ))` and similarly for `rTensor_mkQ`
* `TensorProduct.map_ker` computes the kernel of `TensorProduct.map f g'`
in the presence of two short exact sequences.
The proofs are those of [bourbaki1989] (chap. 2, §3, n°6)
## Algebras
In the case of a tensor product of algebras, these results can be particularized
to compute some kernels.
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.ker_map` computes the kernel of `Algebra.TensorProduct.map f g`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lTensor_ker` and `Algebra.TensorProduct.rTensor_ker`
compute the kernels of `Algebra.TensorProduct.map f id` and `Algebra.TensorProduct.map id g`
## Note on implementation
* All kernels are computed by applying the first isomorphism theorem and
establishing some isomorphisms.
* The proofs are essentially done twice,
once for `lTensor` and then for `rTensor`.
It is possible to apply `TensorProduct.flip` to deduce one of them
from the other.
However, this approach will lead to different isomorphisms,
and it is not quicker.
* The proofs of `Ideal.map_includeLeft_eq` and `Ideal.map_includeRight_eq`
could be easier if `I ⊗[R] B` was naturally an `A ⊗[R] B` module,
and the map to `A ⊗[R] B` was known to be linear.
This depends on the B-module structure on a tensor product
whose use rapidly conflicts with everything…
## TODO
* Treat the noncommutative case
* Treat the case of modules over semirings
(For a possible definition of an exact sequence of commutative semigroups, see
[Grillet-1969b], Pierre-Antoine Grillet,
*The tensor product of commutative semigroups*,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (1969), 281-293, doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0237688-1 .)
-/
section Modules
open TensorProduct LinearMap
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {M N P Q : Type*}
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P] [AddCommMonoid Q]
[Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
{f : M →ₗ[R] N} (g : N →ₗ[R] P)
lemma le_comap_range_lTensor (q : Q) :
LinearMap.range g ≤ (LinearMap.range (lTensor Q g)).comap (TensorProduct.mk R Q P q) := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨q ⊗ₜ[R] n, rfl⟩
lemma le_comap_range_rTensor (q : Q) :
LinearMap.range g ≤ (LinearMap.range (rTensor Q g)).comap
((TensorProduct.mk R P Q).flip q) := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n ⊗ₜ[R] q, rfl⟩
variable (Q) {g}
/-- If `g` is surjective, then `lTensor Q g` is surjective -/
theorem LinearMap.lTensor_surjective (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
Function.Surjective (lTensor Q g) := by
intro z
induction z with
| zero => exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
| tmul q p =>
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hg p
exact ⟨q ⊗ₜ[R] n, rfl⟩
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hy
exact ⟨x + y, map_add _ _ _⟩
theorem LinearMap.lTensor_range :
range (lTensor Q g) =
range (lTensor Q (Submodule.subtype (range g))) := by
have : g = (Submodule.subtype _).comp g.rangeRestrict := rfl
nth_rewrite 1 [this]
rw [lTensor_comp]
apply range_comp_of_range_eq_top
rw [range_eq_top]
apply lTensor_surjective
rw [← range_eq_top, range_rangeRestrict]
/-- If `g` is surjective, then `rTensor Q g` is surjective -/
theorem LinearMap.rTensor_surjective (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
Function.Surjective (rTensor Q g) := by
intro z
induction z with
| zero => exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
| tmul p q =>
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hg p
exact ⟨n ⊗ₜ[R] q, rfl⟩
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hy
exact ⟨x + y, map_add _ _ _⟩
theorem LinearMap.rTensor_range :
range (rTensor Q g) =
range (rTensor Q (Submodule.subtype (range g))) := by
have : g = (Submodule.subtype _).comp g.rangeRestrict := rfl
nth_rewrite 1 [this]
rw [rTensor_comp]
apply range_comp_of_range_eq_top
rw [range_eq_top]
apply rTensor_surjective
rw [← range_eq_top, range_rangeRestrict]
lemma LinearMap.rTensor_exact_iff_lTensor_exact :
Function.Exact (f.rTensor Q) (g.rTensor Q) ↔
Function.Exact (f.lTensor Q) (g.lTensor Q) :=
Function.Exact.iff_of_ladder_linearEquiv (e₁ := TensorProduct.comm _ _ _)
(e₂ := TensorProduct.comm _ _ _) (e₃ := TensorProduct.comm _ _ _)
(by ext; simp) (by ext; simp)
variable (hg : Function.Surjective g)
{N' P' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N'] [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R N'] [Module R P']
{g' : N' →ₗ[R] P'} (hg' : Function.Surjective g')
include hg hg' in
theorem TensorProduct.map_surjective : Function.Surjective (TensorProduct.map g g') := by
rw [← lTensor_comp_rTensor, coe_comp]
exact Function.Surjective.comp (lTensor_surjective _ hg') (rTensor_surjective _ hg)
end Semiring
variable {R M N P : Type*} [CommRing R]
[AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [AddCommGroup P]
[Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
open Function
variable {f : M →ₗ[R] N} {g : N →ₗ[R] P}
(Q : Type*) [AddCommGroup Q] [Module R Q]
(hfg : Exact f g) (hg : Function.Surjective g)
/-- The direct map in `lTensor.equiv` -/
noncomputable def lTensor.toFun (hfg : Exact f g) :
Q ⊗[R] N ⧸ LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f) →ₗ[R] Q ⊗[R] P :=
Submodule.liftQ _ (lTensor Q g) <| by
rw [LinearMap.range_le_iff_comap, ← LinearMap.ker_comp,
← lTensor_comp, hfg.linearMap_comp_eq_zero, lTensor_zero, ker_zero]
/-- The inverse map in `lTensor.equiv_of_rightInverse` (computably, given a right inverse) -/
noncomputable def lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse {h : P → N} (hfg : Exact f g)
(hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) :
Q ⊗[R] P →ₗ[R] Q ⊗[R] N ⧸ LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f) :=
TensorProduct.lift <| LinearMap.flip <| {
toFun := fun p ↦ Submodule.mkQ _ ∘ₗ ((TensorProduct.mk R _ _).flip (h p))
map_add' := fun p p' => LinearMap.ext fun q => (Submodule.Quotient.eq _).mpr <| by
change q ⊗ₜ[R] (h (p + p')) - (q ⊗ₜ[R] (h p) + q ⊗ₜ[R] (h p')) ∈ range (lTensor Q f)
rw [← TensorProduct.tmul_add, ← TensorProduct.tmul_sub]
apply le_comap_range_lTensor f
rw [exact_iff] at hfg
simp only [← hfg, mem_ker, map_sub, map_add, hgh _, sub_self]
map_smul' := fun r p => LinearMap.ext fun q => (Submodule.Quotient.eq _).mpr <| by
change q ⊗ₜ[R] (h (r • p)) - r • q ⊗ₜ[R] (h p) ∈ range (lTensor Q f)
rw [← TensorProduct.tmul_smul, ← TensorProduct.tmul_sub]
apply le_comap_range_lTensor f
rw [exact_iff] at hfg
simp only [← hfg, mem_ker, map_sub, map_smul, hgh _, sub_self] }
lemma lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply
{h : P → N} (hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) (y : Q ⊗[R] N) :
(lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg hgh) ((lTensor Q g) y) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f))) y := by
simp only [← LinearMap.comp_apply, ← Submodule.mkQ_apply]
rw [exact_iff] at hfg
apply LinearMap.congr_fun
apply TensorProduct.ext'
intro n q
simp? [lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse] says
simp only [inverse_of_rightInverse, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, lTensor_tmul,
lift.tmul, flip_apply, coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, mk_apply, Submodule.mkQ_apply]
rw [Submodule.Quotient.eq, ← TensorProduct.tmul_sub]
apply le_comap_range_lTensor f n
rw [← hfg, mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, hgh]
lemma lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_comp_lTensor
{h : P → N} (hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) :
(lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg hgh).comp (lTensor Q g) =
Submodule.mkQ (p := LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f)) := by
rw [LinearMap.ext_iff]
intro y
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, Submodule.mkQ_apply,
lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
/-- The inverse map in `lTensor.equiv` -/
noncomputable
def lTensor.inverse :
Q ⊗[R] P →ₗ[R] Q ⊗[R] N ⧸ LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f) :=
lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hg)
lemma lTensor.inverse_apply (y : Q ⊗[R] N) :
(lTensor.inverse Q hfg hg) ((lTensor Q g) y) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := (LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f))) y := by
rw [lTensor.inverse, lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
lemma lTensor.inverse_comp_lTensor :
(lTensor.inverse Q hfg hg).comp (lTensor Q g) =
Submodule.mkQ (p := LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f)) := by
rw [lTensor.inverse, lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_comp_lTensor]
/-- For a surjective `f : N →ₗ[R] P`,
the natural equivalence between `Q ⊗ N ⧸ (image of ker f)` to `Q ⊗ P`
(computably, given a right inverse) -/
noncomputable
def lTensor.linearEquiv_of_rightInverse {h : P → N} (hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) :
((Q ⊗[R] N) ⧸ (LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f))) ≃ₗ[R] (Q ⊗[R] P) := {
toLinearMap := lTensor.toFun Q hfg
invFun := lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg hgh
left_inv := fun y ↦ by
simp only [lTensor.toFun, AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_toAddHom]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mkQ_surjective _ y
simp only [Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.liftQ_apply, lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
right_inv := fun z ↦ by
simp only [AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_toAddHom]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := lTensor_surjective Q (hgh.surjective) z
rw [lTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
simp only [lTensor.toFun, Submodule.liftQ_apply] }
/-- For a surjective `f : N →ₗ[R] P`,
the natural equivalence between `Q ⊗ N ⧸ (image of ker f)` to `Q ⊗ P` -/
noncomputable def lTensor.equiv :
((Q ⊗[R] N) ⧸ (LinearMap.range (lTensor Q f))) ≃ₗ[R] (Q ⊗[R] P) :=
lTensor.linearEquiv_of_rightInverse Q hfg (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hg)
include hfg hg in
/-- Tensoring an exact pair on the left gives an exact pair -/
theorem lTensor_exact : Exact (lTensor Q f) (lTensor Q g) := by
rw [exact_iff, ← Submodule.ker_mkQ (p := range (lTensor Q f)),
← lTensor.inverse_comp_lTensor Q hfg hg]
apply symm
apply LinearMap.ker_comp_of_ker_eq_bot
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
exact (lTensor.equiv Q hfg hg).symm.injective
/-- Right-exactness of tensor product -/
lemma lTensor_mkQ (N : Submodule R M) :
ker (lTensor Q (N.mkQ)) = range (lTensor Q N.subtype) := by
rw [← exact_iff]
exact lTensor_exact Q (LinearMap.exact_subtype_mkQ N) (Submodule.mkQ_surjective N)
/-- The direct map in `rTensor.equiv` -/
noncomputable def rTensor.toFun (hfg : Exact f g) :
N ⊗[R] Q ⧸ range (rTensor Q f) →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
Submodule.liftQ _ (rTensor Q g) <| by
rw [range_le_iff_comap, ← ker_comp, ← rTensor_comp,
hfg.linearMap_comp_eq_zero, rTensor_zero, ker_zero]
/-- The inverse map in `rTensor.equiv_of_rightInverse` (computably, given a right inverse) -/
noncomputable def rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse {h : P → N} (hfg : Exact f g)
(hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) :
P ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] Q ⧸ LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f) :=
TensorProduct.lift {
toFun := fun p ↦ Submodule.mkQ _ ∘ₗ TensorProduct.mk R _ _ (h p)
map_add' := fun p p' => LinearMap.ext fun q => (Submodule.Quotient.eq _).mpr <| by
change h (p + p') ⊗ₜ[R] q - (h p ⊗ₜ[R] q + h p' ⊗ₜ[R] q) ∈ range (rTensor Q f)
rw [← TensorProduct.add_tmul, ← TensorProduct.sub_tmul]
apply le_comap_range_rTensor f
rw [exact_iff] at hfg
simp only [← hfg, mem_ker, map_sub, map_add, hgh _, sub_self]
map_smul' := fun r p => LinearMap.ext fun q => (Submodule.Quotient.eq _).mpr <| by
change h (r • p) ⊗ₜ[R] q - r • h p ⊗ₜ[R] q ∈ range (rTensor Q f)
rw [TensorProduct.smul_tmul', ← TensorProduct.sub_tmul]
apply le_comap_range_rTensor f
rw [exact_iff] at hfg
simp only [← hfg, mem_ker, map_sub, map_smul, hgh _, sub_self] }
lemma rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply
{h : P → N} (hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) (y : N ⊗[R] Q) :
(rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg hgh) ((rTensor Q g) y) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f)) y := by
simp only [← LinearMap.comp_apply, ← Submodule.mkQ_apply]
rw [exact_iff] at hfg
apply LinearMap.congr_fun
apply TensorProduct.ext'
intro n q
simp? [rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse] says
simp only [inverse_of_rightInverse, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, rTensor_tmul,
lift.tmul, coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, mk_apply, Submodule.mkQ_apply]
rw [Submodule.Quotient.eq, ← TensorProduct.sub_tmul]
apply le_comap_range_rTensor f
rw [← hfg, mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, hgh]
lemma rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_comp_rTensor
{h : P → N} (hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) :
(rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg hgh).comp (rTensor Q g) =
Submodule.mkQ (p := LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f)) := by
rw [LinearMap.ext_iff]
intro y
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, Submodule.mkQ_apply,
rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
/-- The inverse map in `rTensor.equiv` -/
noncomputable
def rTensor.inverse :
P ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] Q ⧸ LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f) :=
rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hg)
lemma rTensor.inverse_apply (y : N ⊗[R] Q) :
(rTensor.inverse Q hfg hg) ((rTensor Q g) y) =
Submodule.Quotient.mk (p := LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f)) y := by
rw [rTensor.inverse, rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
lemma rTensor.inverse_comp_rTensor :
(rTensor.inverse Q hfg hg).comp (rTensor Q g) =
Submodule.mkQ (p := LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f)) := by
rw [rTensor.inverse, rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_comp_rTensor]
/-- For a surjective `f : N →ₗ[R] P`,
the natural equivalence between `N ⊗[R] Q ⧸ (range (rTensor Q f))` and `P ⊗[R] Q`
(computably, given a right inverse) -/
noncomputable
def rTensor.linearEquiv_of_rightInverse {h : P → N} (hgh : Function.RightInverse h g) :
((N ⊗[R] Q) ⧸ (range (rTensor Q f))) ≃ₗ[R] (P ⊗[R] Q) := {
toLinearMap := rTensor.toFun Q hfg
invFun := rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse Q hfg hgh
left_inv := fun y ↦ by
simp only [rTensor.toFun, AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_toAddHom]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mkQ_surjective _ y
simp only [Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.liftQ_apply, rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
right_inv := fun z ↦ by
simp only [AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, coe_toAddHom]
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := rTensor_surjective Q hgh.surjective z
rw [rTensor.inverse_of_rightInverse_apply]
simp only [rTensor.toFun, Submodule.liftQ_apply] }
/-- For a surjective `f : N →ₗ[R] P`,
the natural equivalence between `N ⊗[R] Q ⧸ (range (rTensor Q f))` and `P ⊗[R] Q` -/
noncomputable def rTensor.equiv :
((N ⊗[R] Q) ⧸ (LinearMap.range (rTensor Q f))) ≃ₗ[R] (P ⊗[R] Q) :=
rTensor.linearEquiv_of_rightInverse Q hfg (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hg)
include hfg hg in
/-- Tensoring an exact pair on the right gives an exact pair -/
theorem rTensor_exact : Exact (rTensor Q f) (rTensor Q g) := by
rw [rTensor_exact_iff_lTensor_exact]
exact lTensor_exact Q hfg hg
/-- Right-exactness of tensor product (`rTensor`) -/
lemma rTensor_mkQ (N : Submodule R M) :
ker (rTensor Q N.mkQ) = range (rTensor Q N.subtype) := by
rw [← exact_iff]
exact rTensor_exact Q (LinearMap.exact_subtype_mkQ N) (Submodule.mkQ_surjective N)
open Submodule LinearEquiv in
lemma LinearMap.ker_tensorProductMk {I : Ideal R} :
ker (TensorProduct.mk R (R ⧸ I) Q 1) = I • ⊤ := by
apply comap_injective_of_surjective (TensorProduct.lid R Q).surjective
rw [← comap_coe_toLinearMap, ← ker_comp]
convert rTensor_mkQ Q I
· ext; simp
rw [← comap_coe_toLinearMap, ← toLinearMap_eq_coe, comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, toLinearMap_eq_coe,
map_coe_toLinearMap, map_symm_eq_iff, map_range_rTensor_subtype_lid]
variable {M' N' P' : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup N'] [AddCommGroup P']
[Module R M'] [Module R N'] [Module R P']
{f' : M' →ₗ[R] N'} {g' : N' →ₗ[R] P'}
(hfg' : Exact f' g') (hg' : Function.Surjective g')
include hg hg' hfg hfg' in
/-- Kernel of a product map (right-exactness of tensor product) -/
theorem TensorProduct.map_ker :
ker (TensorProduct.map g g') = range (lTensor N f') ⊔ range (rTensor N' f) := by
rw [← lTensor_comp_rTensor]
rw [ker_comp]
rw [← Exact.linearMap_ker_eq (rTensor_exact N' hfg hg)]
rw [← Submodule.comap_map_eq]
apply congr_arg₂ _ rfl
rw [range_eq_map, ← Submodule.map_comp, rTensor_comp_lTensor,
Submodule.map_top]
rw [← lTensor_comp_rTensor, range_eq_map, Submodule.map_comp,
Submodule.map_top]
rw [range_eq_top.mpr (rTensor_surjective M' hg), Submodule.map_top]
rw [Exact.linearMap_ker_eq (lTensor_exact P hfg' hg')]
end Modules
section Algebras
open Algebra.TensorProduct
open scoped TensorProduct
variable
{R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
{A B : Type*} [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
/-- The ideal of `A ⊗[R] B` generated by `I` is the image of `I ⊗[R] B` -/
lemma Ideal.map_includeLeft_eq (I : Ideal A) :
(I.map (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B)).restrictScalars R
= LinearMap.range (LinearMap.rTensor B (Submodule.subtype (I.restrictScalars R))) := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq]
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
simp only [Submodule.coe_restrictScalars, SetLike.mem_coe, LinearMap.mem_range]
rw [Ideal.map, ← submodule_span_eq] at hx
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx
· intro x
simp only [includeLeft_apply, Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe]
rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use ⟨y, hy⟩ ⊗ₜ[R] 1
rfl
· use 0
simp only [map_zero]
· rintro x y - - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x + y
simp only [map_add]
· rintro a x - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
induction a with
| zero =>
use 0
simp only [map_zero, smul_eq_mul, zero_mul]
| tmul a b =>
induction x with
| zero =>
use 0
simp only [map_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero]
| tmul x y =>
use (a • x) ⊗ₜ[R] (b * y)
simp only [LinearMap.lTensor_tmul, Submodule.coe_subtype, smul_eq_mul, tmul_mul_tmul]
with_unfolding_all rfl
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hy
use x' + y'
simp only [map_add, hx', smul_add, hy']
| add a b ha hb =>
obtain ⟨x', ha'⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨y', hb'⟩ := hb
use x' + y'
simp only [map_add, ha', add_smul, hb']
· rintro x ⟨y, rfl⟩
induction y with
| zero =>
rw [map_zero]
apply zero_mem
| tmul a b =>
simp only [LinearMap.rTensor_tmul, Submodule.coe_subtype]
suffices (a : A) ⊗ₜ[R] b = ((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] b) * ((a : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)) by
simp only [Submodule.coe_restrictScalars, SetLike.mem_coe]
rw [this]
apply Ideal.mul_mem_left
-- Note: adding `includeLeft` as a hint fixes a timeout https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386
apply Ideal.mem_map_of_mem includeLeft
exact Submodule.coe_mem a
simp only [Submodule.coe_restrictScalars, Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul,
mul_one, one_mul]
| add x y hx hy =>
rw [map_add]
apply Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
/-- The ideal of `A ⊗[R] B` generated by `I` is the image of `A ⊗[R] I` -/
lemma Ideal.map_includeRight_eq (I : Ideal B) :
(I.map (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight : B →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] B)).restrictScalars R
= LinearMap.range (LinearMap.lTensor A (Submodule.subtype (I.restrictScalars R))) := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_set_eq]
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, LinearMap.mem_range]
rw [Ideal.map, ← submodule_span_eq] at hx
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx
· intro x
simp only [includeRight_apply, Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe]
rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use 1 ⊗ₜ[R] ⟨y, hy⟩
rfl
· use 0
simp only [map_zero]
· rintro x y - - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x + y
simp only [map_add]
· rintro a x - ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
induction a with
| zero =>
use 0
simp only [map_zero, smul_eq_mul, zero_mul]
| tmul a b =>
induction x with
| zero =>
use 0
simp only [map_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero]
| tmul x y =>
use (a * x) ⊗ₜ[R] (b •y)
simp only [LinearMap.lTensor_tmul, Submodule.coe_subtype, smul_eq_mul, tmul_mul_tmul]
rfl
| add x y hx hy =>
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hy
use x' + y'
simp only [map_add, hx', smul_add, hy']
| add a b ha hb =>
obtain ⟨x', ha'⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨y', hb'⟩ := hb
use x' + y'
simp only [map_add, ha', add_smul, hb']
· rintro x ⟨y, rfl⟩
induction y with
| zero =>
rw [map_zero]
apply zero_mem
| tmul a b =>
simp only [LinearMap.lTensor_tmul, Submodule.coe_subtype]
suffices a ⊗ₜ[R] (b : B) = (a ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : B)) * ((1 : A) ⊗ₜ[R] (b : B)) by
rw [this]
simp only [Submodule.coe_restrictScalars, SetLike.mem_coe]
apply Ideal.mul_mem_left
-- Note: adding `includeRight` as a hint fixes a timeout https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386
apply Ideal.mem_map_of_mem includeRight
exact Submodule.coe_mem b
simp only [Submodule.coe_restrictScalars, Algebra.TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul,
mul_one, one_mul]
| add x y hx hy =>
rw [map_add]
apply Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy
-- Now, we can prove the right exactness properties of the tensor product,
-- in its versions for algebras
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
{A B C D : Type*} [Ring A] [Ring B] [Ring C] [Ring D]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra R C] [Algebra R D]
(f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : C →ₐ[R] D)
|
/-- If `g` is surjective, then the kernel of `(id A) ⊗ g` is generated by the kernel of `g` -/
lemma Algebra.TensorProduct.lTensor_ker (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
RingHom.ker (map (AlgHom.id R A) g) =
(RingHom.ker g).map (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight : C →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] C) := by
rw [← Submodule.restrictScalars_inj R]
have : (RingHom.ker (map (AlgHom.id R A) g)).restrictScalars R =
LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.lTensor A (AlgHom.toLinearMap g)) := rfl
rw [this, Ideal.map_includeRight_eq]
rw [(lTensor_exact A g.toLinearMap.exact_subtype_ker_map hg).linearMap_ker_eq]
rfl
/-- If `f` is surjective, then the kernel of `f ⊗ (id B)` is generated by the kernel of `f` -/
lemma Algebra.TensorProduct.rTensor_ker (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
RingHom.ker (map f (AlgHom.id R C)) =
(RingHom.ker f).map (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] C) := by
rw [← Submodule.restrictScalars_inj R]
have : (RingHom.ker (map f (AlgHom.id R C))).restrictScalars R =
LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.rTensor C (AlgHom.toLinearMap f)) := rfl
rw [this, Ideal.map_includeLeft_eq]
rw [(rTensor_exact C f.toLinearMap.exact_subtype_ker_map hf).linearMap_ker_eq]
rfl
/-- If `f` and `g` are surjective morphisms of algebras, then
the kernel of `Algebra.TensorProduct.map f g` is generated by the kernels of `f` and `g` -/
theorem Algebra.TensorProduct.map_ker (hf : Function.Surjective f) (hg : Function.Surjective g) :
RingHom.ker (map f g) =
(RingHom.ker f).map (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeLeft : A →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] C) ⊔
(RingHom.ker g).map (Algebra.TensorProduct.includeRight : C →ₐ[R] A ⊗[R] C) := by
-- rewrite map f g as the composition of two maps
have : map f g = (map f (AlgHom.id R D)).comp (map (AlgHom.id R A) g) := ext rfl rfl
rw [this]
-- this needs some rewriting to RingHom
-- TODO: can `RingHom.comap_ker` take an arbitrary `RingHomClass`, rather than just `RingHom`?
simp only [AlgHom.ker_coe, AlgHom.comp_toRingHom]
rw [← RingHom.comap_ker]
simp only [← AlgHom.ker_coe]
-- apply one step of exactness
rw [← Algebra.TensorProduct.lTensor_ker _ hg, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot (map (AlgHom.id R A) g)]
rw [← Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective (map (AlgHom.id R A) g) (LinearMap.lTensor_surjective A hg)]
-- apply the other step of exactness
rw [Algebra.TensorProduct.rTensor_ker _ hf]
apply congr_arg₂ _ rfl
simp only [AlgHom.coe_ideal_map, Ideal.map_map]
rw [← AlgHom.comp_toRingHom, Algebra.TensorProduct.map_comp_includeLeft]
rfl
end Algebras
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/RightExactness.lean | 580 | 646 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.ProjectiveSpectrum.Topology
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.LocalPredicate
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.HomogeneousLocalization
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
/-!
# The structure sheaf on `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜`.
In `Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Topology`, we have given a topology on `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜`; in
this file we will construct a sheaf on `ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜`.
## Notation
- `R` is a commutative semiring;
- `A` is a commutative ring and an `R`-algebra;
- `𝒜 : ℕ → Submodule R A` is the grading of `A`;
- `U` is opposite object of some open subset of `ProjectiveSpectrum.top`.
## Main definitions and results
We define the structure sheaf as the subsheaf of all dependent function
`f : Π x : U, HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` such that `f` is locally expressible as ratio of two
elements of the *same grading*, i.e. `∀ y ∈ U, ∃ (V ⊆ U) (i : ℕ) (a b ∈ 𝒜 i), ∀ z ∈ V, f z = a / b`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf.isLocallyFraction`: the predicate that
a dependent function is locally expressible as a ratio of two elements of the same grading.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf.sectionsSubring`: the dependent functions
satisfying the above local property forms a subring of all dependent functions
`Π x : U, HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Proj.StructureSheaf`: the sheaf with `U ↦ sectionsSubring U` and natural
restriction map.
Then we establish that `Proj 𝒜` is a `LocallyRingedSpace`:
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Proj.stalkIso'`: for any `x : ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜`, the stalk of
`Proj.StructureSheaf` at `x` is isomorphic to `HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace`: `Proj` as a locally ringed space.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open scoped DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike Localization TopCat TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
variable {R A : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ℕ → Submodule R A) [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
local notation3 "at " x =>
HomogeneousLocalization.AtPrime 𝒜
(HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal (ProjectiveSpectrum.asHomogeneousIdeal x))
namespace ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf
variable {𝒜} in
/-- The predicate saying that a dependent function on an open `U` is realised as a fixed fraction
`r / s` of *same grading* in each of the stalks (which are localizations at various prime ideals).
-/
def IsFraction {U : Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜)} (f : ∀ x : U, at x.1) : Prop :=
∃ (i : ℕ) (r s : 𝒜 i) (s_nin : ∀ x : U, s.1 ∉ x.1.asHomogeneousIdeal),
∀ x : U, f x = .mk ⟨i, r, s, s_nin x⟩
/--
The predicate `IsFraction` is "prelocal", in the sense that if it holds on `U` it holds on any open
subset `V` of `U`.
-/
def isFractionPrelocal : PrelocalPredicate fun x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜 => at x where
pred f := IsFraction f
res := by rintro V U i f ⟨j, r, s, h, w⟩; exact ⟨j, r, s, (h <| i ·), (w <| i ·)⟩
/-- We will define the structure sheaf as the subsheaf of all dependent functions in
`Π x : U, HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x` consisting of those functions which can locally be expressed
as a ratio of `A` of same grading. -/
def isLocallyFraction : LocalPredicate fun x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜 => at x :=
(isFractionPrelocal 𝒜).sheafify
namespace SectionSubring
variable {𝒜}
open Submodule SetLike.GradedMonoid HomogeneousLocalization
theorem zero_mem' (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) :
(isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred (0 : ∀ x : U.unop, at x.1) := fun x =>
⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 (unop U), ⟨0, ⟨0, zero_mem _⟩, ⟨1, one_mem_graded _⟩, _, fun _ => rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_mem' (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) :
(isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred (1 : ∀ x : U.unop, at x.1) := fun x =>
⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 (unop U), ⟨0, ⟨1, one_mem_graded _⟩, ⟨1, one_mem_graded _⟩, _, fun _ => rfl⟩⟩
theorem add_mem' (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) (a b : ∀ x : U.unop, at x.1)
(ha : (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred a) (hb : (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred b) :
(isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred (a + b) := fun x => by
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ja, ⟨ra, ra_mem⟩, ⟨sa, sa_mem⟩, hwa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, jb, ⟨rb, rb_mem⟩, ⟨sb, sb_mem⟩, hwb, wb⟩
refine
⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ja + jb,
⟨sb * ra + sa * rb,
add_mem (add_comm jb ja ▸ mul_mem_graded sb_mem ra_mem : sb * ra ∈ 𝒜 (ja + jb))
(mul_mem_graded sa_mem rb_mem)⟩,
⟨sa * sb, mul_mem_graded sa_mem sb_mem⟩, fun y ↦
y.1.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl.mul_mem (hwa ⟨y.1, y.2.1⟩) (hwb ⟨y.1, y.2.2⟩), ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
simp only [Subtype.forall, Opens.apply_mk] at wa wb
simp [wa y hy.1, wb y hy.2, ext_iff_val, add_mk, add_comm (sa * rb)]
theorem neg_mem' (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) (a : ∀ x : U.unop, at x.1)
(ha : (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred a) : (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred (-a) := fun x => by
rcases ha x with ⟨V, m, i, j, ⟨r, r_mem⟩, ⟨s, s_mem⟩, nin, hy⟩
refine ⟨V, m, i, j, ⟨-r, Submodule.neg_mem _ r_mem⟩, ⟨s, s_mem⟩, nin, fun y => ?_⟩
simp only [ext_iff_val, val_mk] at hy
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, ext_iff_val, val_neg, hy, val_mk, neg_mk]
theorem mul_mem' (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) (a b : ∀ x : U.unop, at x.1)
(ha : (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred a) (hb : (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred b) :
(isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred (a * b) := fun x => by
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ja, ⟨ra, ra_mem⟩, ⟨sa, sa_mem⟩, hwa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, jb, ⟨rb, rb_mem⟩, ⟨sb, sb_mem⟩, hwb, wb⟩
refine
⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ja + jb,
⟨ra * rb, SetLike.mul_mem_graded ra_mem rb_mem⟩,
⟨sa * sb, SetLike.mul_mem_graded sa_mem sb_mem⟩, fun y =>
y.1.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl.mul_mem (hwa ⟨y.1, y.2.1⟩) (hwb ⟨y.1, y.2.2⟩), ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
simp only [Subtype.forall, Opens.apply_mk] at wa wb
simp [wa y hy.1, wb y hy.2, ext_iff_val, Localization.mk_mul]
end SectionSubring
section
open SectionSubring
variable {𝒜}
/-- The functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction` form a subring of all dependent functions
`Π x : U, HomogeneousLocalization 𝒜 x`. -/
def sectionsSubring (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) :
Subring (∀ x : U.unop, at x.1) where
carrier := {f | (isLocallyFraction 𝒜).pred f}
zero_mem' := zero_mem' U
one_mem' := one_mem' U
add_mem' := add_mem' U _ _
neg_mem' := neg_mem' U _
mul_mem' := mul_mem' U _ _
end
/-- The structure sheaf (valued in `Type`, not yet `CommRing`) is the subsheaf consisting of
functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction`. -/
def structureSheafInType : Sheaf (Type _) (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) :=
subsheafToTypes (isLocallyFraction 𝒜)
instance commRingStructureSheafInTypeObj (U : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ) :
CommRing ((structureSheafInType 𝒜).1.obj U) :=
(sectionsSubring U).toCommRing
/-- The structure presheaf, valued in `CommRing`, constructed by dressing up the `Type` valued
structure presheaf. -/
@[simps obj_carrier]
def structurePresheafInCommRing : Presheaf CommRingCat (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) where
obj U := CommRingCat.of ((structureSheafInType 𝒜).1.obj U)
map i := CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun := (structureSheafInType 𝒜).1.map i
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
/-- Some glue, verifying that the structure presheaf valued in `CommRing` agrees with the `Type`
valued structure presheaf. -/
def structurePresheafCompForget :
structurePresheafInCommRing 𝒜 ⋙ forget CommRingCat ≅ (structureSheafInType 𝒜).1 :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ => Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
end ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf
namespace ProjectiveSpectrum
open TopCat.Presheaf ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf Opens
/-- The structure sheaf on `Proj` 𝒜, valued in `CommRing`. -/
def Proj.structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) :=
⟨structurePresheafInCommRing 𝒜,
(-- We check the sheaf condition under `forget CommRing`.
isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp
_ _).mpr
(isSheaf_of_iso (structurePresheafCompForget 𝒜).symm (structureSheafInType 𝒜).cond)⟩
end ProjectiveSpectrum
section
open ProjectiveSpectrum ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf Opens
section
variable {U V : (Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))ᵒᵖ} (i : V ⟶ U)
(s t : (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj V) (x : V.unop)
@[simp]
theorem Proj.res_apply (x) : ((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.map i s).1 x = s.1 (i.unop x) := rfl
@[ext] theorem Proj.ext (h : s.1 = t.1) : s = t := Subtype.ext h
@[simp] theorem Proj.add_apply : (s + t).1 x = s.1 x + t.1 x := rfl
@[simp] theorem Proj.mul_apply : (s * t).1 x = s.1 x * t.1 x := rfl
@[simp] theorem Proj.sub_apply : (s - t).1 x = s.1 x - t.1 x := rfl
@[simp] theorem Proj.pow_apply (n : ℕ) : (s ^ n).1 x = s.1 x ^ n := rfl
@[simp] theorem Proj.zero_apply : (0 : (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj V).1 x = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem Proj.one_apply : (1 : (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj V).1 x = 1 := rfl
end
/-- `Proj` of a graded ring as a `SheafedSpace` -/
def Proj.toSheafedSpace : SheafedSpace CommRingCat where
carrier := TopCat.of (ProjectiveSpectrum 𝒜)
presheaf := (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1
IsSheaf := (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).2
/-- The ring homomorphism that takes a section of the structure sheaf of `Proj` on the open set `U`,
implemented as a subtype of dependent functions to localizations at homogeneous prime ideals, and
evaluates the section on the point corresponding to a given homogeneous prime ideal. -/
def openToLocalization (U : Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜)) (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜)
(hx : x ∈ U) : (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj (op U) ⟶ CommRingCat.of (at x) :=
CommRingCat.ofHom
{ toFun s := (s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :)
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
/-- The ring homomorphism from the stalk of the structure sheaf of `Proj` at a point corresponding
to a homogeneous prime ideal `x` to the *homogeneous localization* at `x`,
formed by gluing the `openToLocalization` maps. -/
def stalkToFiberRingHom (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) :
(Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.stalk x ⟶ CommRingCat.of (at x) :=
Limits.colimit.desc ((OpenNhds.inclusion x).op ⋙ (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1)
{ pt := _
ι :=
{ app := fun U =>
openToLocalization 𝒜 ((OpenNhds.inclusion _).obj U.unop) x U.unop.2 } }
@[simp]
theorem germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom
(U : Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜)) (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) (hx : x ∈ U) :
(Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ U x hx ≫ stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 x =
openToLocalization 𝒜 U x hx :=
Limits.colimit.ι_desc _ _
@[simp]
theorem stalkToFiberRingHom_germ (U : Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))
(x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) (hx : x ∈ U) (s : (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj (op U)) :
stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 x ((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ _ x hx s) = s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
RingHom.ext_iff.1 (CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (germ_comp_stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 U x hx)) s
theorem mem_basicOpen_den (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜)
(f : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl) :
x ∈ ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 f.den := by
rw [ProjectiveSpectrum.mem_basicOpen]
exact f.den_mem
/-- Given a point `x` corresponding to a homogeneous prime ideal, there is a (dependent) function
such that, for any `f` in the homogeneous localization at `x`, it returns the obvious section in the
basic open set `D(f.den)`. -/
def sectionInBasicOpen (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) :
∀ f : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl,
(Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj (op (ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 f.den)) :=
fun f =>
⟨fun y => HomogeneousLocalization.mk ⟨f.deg, f.num, f.den, y.2⟩, fun y =>
⟨ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 f.den, y.2,
⟨𝟙 _, ⟨f.deg, ⟨f.num, f.den, _, fun _ => rfl⟩⟩⟩⟩⟩
open HomogeneousLocalization in
/-- Given any point `x` and `f` in the homogeneous localization at `x`, there is an element in the
stalk at `x` obtained by `sectionInBasicOpen`. This is the inverse of `stalkToFiberRingHom`.
-/
def homogeneousLocalizationToStalk (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) (y : at x) :
(Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.stalk x := Quotient.liftOn' y (fun f =>
(Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ _ x (mem_basicOpen_den _ x f) (sectionInBasicOpen _ x f))
fun f g (e : f.embedding = g.embedding) ↦ by
simp only [HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg.embedding, Localization.mk_eq_mk',
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq,
IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists x.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl] at e
obtain ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, hc'⟩ := e
apply (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ_ext
(ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 f.den.1 ⊓
ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 g.den.1 ⊓ ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 c)
⟨⟨mem_basicOpen_den _ x f, mem_basicOpen_den _ x g⟩, hc⟩
(homOfLE inf_le_left ≫ homOfLE inf_le_left) (homOfLE inf_le_left ≫ homOfLE inf_le_right)
apply Subtype.ext
ext ⟨t, ⟨htf, htg⟩, ht'⟩
rw [Proj.res_apply, Proj.res_apply]
simp only [sectionInBasicOpen, HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk, Localization.mk_eq_mk',
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq]
apply (IsLocalization.map_units (M := t.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl)
(Localization t.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.primeCompl) ⟨c, ht'⟩).mul_left_cancel
rw [← map_mul, ← map_mul, hc']
lemma homogeneousLocalizationToStalk_stalkToFiberRingHom (x z) :
homogeneousLocalizationToStalk 𝒜 x (stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 x z) = z := by
obtain ⟨U, hxU, s, rfl⟩ := (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ_exist x z
show homogeneousLocalizationToStalk 𝒜 x ((stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 x).hom
(((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ U x hxU) s)) =
((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ U x hxU) s
obtain ⟨V, hxV, i, n, a, b, h, e⟩ := s.2 ⟨x, hxU⟩
simp only [Subtype.forall, apply_mk] at e
rw [stalkToFiberRingHom_germ, homogeneousLocalizationToStalk, e x hxV, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'']
refine Presheaf.germ_ext (C := CommRingCat) _ V hxV (homOfLE <| fun _ h' ↦ h ⟨_, h'⟩) i ?_
change ((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.map (homOfLE <| fun _ h' ↦ h ⟨_, h'⟩).op) _ =
((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.map i.op) s
apply Subtype.ext
ext ⟨t, ht⟩
rw [Proj.res_apply, Proj.res_apply]
simp [sectionInBasicOpen, HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk, Localization.mk_eq_mk',
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq, e t ht]
lemma stalkToFiberRingHom_homogeneousLocalizationToStalk (x z) :
stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 x (homogeneousLocalizationToStalk 𝒜 x z) = z := by
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mk''_surjective z
rw [homogeneousLocalizationToStalk, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'',
stalkToFiberRingHom_germ, sectionInBasicOpen]
/-- Using `homogeneousLocalizationToStalk`, we construct a ring isomorphism between stalk at `x`
and homogeneous localization at `x` for any point `x` in `Proj`. -/
def Proj.stalkIso' (x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) :
(Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.stalk x ≃+* at x where
__ := (stalkToFiberRingHom _ x).hom
invFun := homogeneousLocalizationToStalk 𝒜 x
left_inv := homogeneousLocalizationToStalk_stalkToFiberRingHom 𝒜 x
right_inv := stalkToFiberRingHom_homogeneousLocalizationToStalk 𝒜 x
@[simp]
theorem Proj.stalkIso'_germ (U : Opens (ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜))
(x : ProjectiveSpectrum.top 𝒜) (hx : x ∈ U) (s : (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).1.obj (op U)) :
Proj.stalkIso' 𝒜 x ((Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ _ x hx s) = s.1 ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
stalkToFiberRingHom_germ 𝒜 U x hx s
@[simp]
theorem Proj.stalkIso'_symm_mk (x) (f) :
(Proj.stalkIso' 𝒜 x).symm (.mk f) = (Proj.structureSheaf 𝒜).presheaf.germ _
x (mem_basicOpen_den _ x f) (sectionInBasicOpen _ x f) := rfl
/-- `Proj` of a graded ring as a `LocallyRingedSpace` -/
def Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace : LocallyRingedSpace :=
{ Proj.toSheafedSpace 𝒜 with
isLocalRing := fun x =>
@RingEquiv.isLocalRing _ _ _ (show IsLocalRing (at x) from inferInstance) _
(Proj.stalkIso' 𝒜 x).symm }
end
end AlgebraicGeometry
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/ProjectiveSpectrum/StructureSheaf.lean | 365 | 369 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Jordan Brown, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jordan Brown, Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.ViaEmbedding
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
/-!
# Solvable Groups
In this file we introduce the notion of a solvable group. We define a solvable group as one whose
derived series is eventually trivial. This requires defining the commutator of two subgroups and
the derived series of a group.
## Main definitions
* `derivedSeries G n` : the `n`th term in the derived series of `G`, defined by iterating
`general_commutator` starting with the top subgroup
* `IsSolvable G` : the group `G` is solvable
-/
open Subgroup
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] {f : G →* G'}
section derivedSeries
variable (G)
/-- The derived series of the group `G`, obtained by starting from the subgroup `⊤` and repeatedly
taking the commutator of the previous subgroup with itself for `n` times. -/
def derivedSeries : ℕ → Subgroup G
| 0 => ⊤
| n + 1 => ⁅derivedSeries n, derivedSeries n⁆
@[simp]
theorem derivedSeries_zero : derivedSeries G 0 = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem derivedSeries_succ (n : ℕ) :
derivedSeries G (n + 1) = ⁅derivedSeries G n, derivedSeries G n⁆ :=
rfl
theorem derivedSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : (derivedSeries G n).Normal := by
induction n with
| zero => exact (⊤ : Subgroup G).normal_of_characteristic
| succ n ih => exact Subgroup.commutator_normal (derivedSeries G n) (derivedSeries G n)
@[simp 1100]
theorem derivedSeries_one : derivedSeries G 1 = commutator G :=
rfl
|
end derivedSeries
section CommutatorMap
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Solvable.lean | 56 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Bhavik Mehta, Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Defs
/-!
# Binomial coefficients
This file defines binomial coefficients and proves simple lemmas (i.e. those not
requiring more imports).
For the lemma that `n.choose k` counts the `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element set,
see `Fintype.card_powersetCard` in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset`.
## Main definition and results
* `Nat.choose`: binomial coefficients, defined inductively
* `Nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial`: a proof that `choose n k = n! / (k! * (n - k)!)`
* `Nat.choose_symm`: symmetry of binomial coefficients
* `Nat.choose_le_succ_of_lt_half_left`: `choose n k` is increasing for small values of `k`
* `Nat.choose_le_middle`: `choose n r` is maximised when `r` is `n/2`
* `Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose`: Relates binomial coefficients to the descending
factorial. This is used to prove `Nat.choose_le_pow` and variants. We provide similar statements
for the ascending factorial.
* `Nat.multichoose`: whereas `choose` counts combinations, `multichoose` counts multicombinations.
The fact that this is indeed the correct counting function for multisets is proved in
`Sym.card_sym_eq_multichoose` in `Data.Sym.Card`.
* `Nat.multichoose_eq` : a proof that `multichoose n k = (n + k - 1).choose k`.
This is central to the "stars and bars" technique in informal mathematics, where we switch between
counting multisets of size `k` over an alphabet of size `n` to counting strings of `k` elements
("stars") separated by `n-1` dividers ("bars"). See `Data.Sym.Card` for more detail.
## Tags
binomial coefficient, combination, multicombination, stars and bars
-/
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- `choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial
coefficients. For the fact that this is the number of `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element
set, see `Fintype.card_powersetCard`. -/
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 => choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_succ' (n k : ℕ) : choose (n + 1) (k + 1) = choose n k + choose n (k + 1) :=
rfl
theorem choose_succ_left (n k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) :
choose (n + 1) k = choose n (k - 1) + choose n k := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, k = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hk
rfl
theorem choose_succ_right (n k : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
choose n (k + 1) = choose (n - 1) k + choose (n - 1) (k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, n = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hn
rfl
theorem choose_eq_choose_pred_add {n k : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (hk : 0 < k) :
choose n k = choose (n - 1) (k - 1) + choose (n - 1) k := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ : ∃ l, k = l + 1 := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' hk
rw [choose_succ_right _ _ hn, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
theorem choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _, 0, hk => absurd hk (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| 0, _ + 1, _ => choose_zero_succ _
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => by
have hnk : n < k := lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk
have hnk1 : n < k + 1 := lt_of_succ_lt hk
rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
@[simp]
theorem choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 := by
induction n <;> simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
@[simp]
lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n := by induction n <;> simp [*, choose, Nat.add_comm]
-- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number
theorem triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * (n + 1 - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n := by
rw [← add_mul_div_left, Nat.mul_comm 2 n, ← Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_comm]
cases n <;> rfl; apply zero_lt_succ
/-- `choose n 2` is the `n`-th triangle number. -/
theorem choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [triangle_succ n, choose, ih]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
theorem choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0, _, hk => by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; decide
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| _ + 1, _ + 1, hk => Nat.add_pos_left (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) _
theorem choose_eq_zero_iff {n k : ℕ} : n.choose k = 0 ↔ n < k :=
⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge (mt Nat.choose_pos h.symm.not_lt), Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt⟩
theorem succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0, 0 => by decide
| 0, k + 1 => by simp [choose]
| n + 1, 0 => by simp [choose, mul_succ, Nat.add_comm]
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), Nat.add_mul, ← succ_mul_choose_eq n, mul_succ, ←
succ_mul_choose_eq n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_add, ← choose_succ_succ, ← succ_mul]
theorem choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * k ! * (n - k)! = n !
| 0, _, hk => by simp [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, succ k, hk => by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ | hk₁
· have h : choose n k * k.succ ! * (n - k)! = (k + 1) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₁ : (n - k)! = (n - k) * (n - k.succ)! := by
rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), factorial_succ]
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * k.succ ! * ((n - k) * (n - k.succ)!) = (n - k) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_lt_succ hk₁)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₃ : k * n ! ≤ n * n ! := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)
rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, Nat.add_mul,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, factorial_succ, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, Nat.add_assoc,
← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_comm]
· rw [hk₁]; simp [hk₁, Nat.mul_comm, choose, Nat.sub_self]
theorem choose_mul {n k s : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n) (hsk : s ≤ k) :
n.choose k * k.choose s = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) :=
have h : 0 < (n - k)! * (k - s)! * s ! := by apply_rules [factorial_pos, Nat.mul_pos]
Nat.mul_right_cancel h <|
calc
n.choose k * k.choose s * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) =
n.choose k * (k.choose s * s ! * (k - s)!) * (n - k)! := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc _ s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (n - k)!, Nat.mul_comm s !]
_ = n ! := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hsk, choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hkn]
_ = n.choose s * s ! * ((n - s).choose (k - s) * (k - s)! * (n - s - (k - s))!) := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.sub_le_sub_right hkn _),
choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (hsk.trans hkn)]
_ = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right hsk, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (k - s)!, Nat.mul_comm s !, Nat.mul_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
theorem choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) :
choose n k = n ! / (k ! * (n - k)!) := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]
exact (mul_div_left _ (Nat.mul_pos (factorial_pos _) (factorial_pos _))).symm
theorem add_choose (i j : ℕ) : (i + j).choose j = (i + j)! / (i ! * j !) := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.le_add_left j i), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_comm]
theorem add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (i j : ℕ) :
(i + j).choose j * i ! * j ! = (i + j)! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_right_comm]
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : k ! * (n - k)! ∣ n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]; exact Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add (i j : ℕ) : i ! * j ! ∣ (i + j)! := by
suffices i ! * (i + j - i) ! ∣ (i + j)! by
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left i j] at this
exact factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n - k) = choose n k := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial hk, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.sub_le _ _),
Nat.sub_sub_self hk, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : Nat.choose n a = Nat.choose n b := by
suffices choose n (n - b) = choose n b by
rw [h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right] at this; rwa [h]
exact choose_symm (h ▸ le_add_left _ _)
theorem choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a + b) a = choose (a + b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
theorem choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m := by
apply choose_symm_of_eq_add
rw [Nat.add_comm m 1, Nat.add_assoc 1 m m, Nat.add_comm (2 * m) 1, Nat.two_mul m]
theorem choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) := by
have e : (n + 1) * choose n k = choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) + choose n k * (k + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm (choose _ _), ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq]
rw [← Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self_right : ∀ n : ℕ, (n + 1).choose n = n + 1
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right n, choose_self]
theorem choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k * (n + 1) = (n + 1).choose k * (n + 1 - k) := by
cases k with
| zero => simp
| succ k =>
obtain hk | hk := le_or_lt (k + 1) (n + 1)
· rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, ← choose_succ_right_eq, ← succ_sub_succ,
Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ hk)]
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (n.lt_succ_self.trans hk), Nat.zero_mul,
Nat.zero_mul]
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) :
(n + 1).ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k).choose k := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n + k - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial <| Nat.le_add_left k n, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
← factorial_mul_ascFactorial, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' (n k : ℕ) :
n.ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k - 1).choose k := by
cases n
· cases k
· rw [ascFactorial_zero, choose_zero_right, factorial_zero, Nat.mul_one]
· simp only [zero_ascFactorial, zero_eq, Nat.zero_add, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.le_zero_eq, Nat.sub_zero, choose_succ_self, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
simp only [succ_add_sub_one]
theorem factorial_dvd_ascFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.ascFactorial k :=
⟨(n + k - 1).choose k, ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _⟩
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k).choose k = (n + 1).ascFactorial k / k ! := by
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel k.factorial_pos
rw [← ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' <| factorial_dvd_ascFactorial _ _).symm
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial' (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k - 1).choose k = n.ascFactorial k / k ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right k.factorial_ne_zero (ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _).symm
theorem descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) : n.descFactorial k = k ! * n.choose k := by
obtain h | h := Nat.lt_or_ge n k
· rw [descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt.2 h, choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial h, ← factorial_mul_descFactorial h, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem factorial_dvd_descFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.descFactorial k :=
⟨n.choose k, descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose _ _⟩
theorem choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k = n.descFactorial k / k ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right k.factorial_ne_zero (descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose _ _).symm
/-- A faster implementation of `choose`, to be used during bytecode evaluation
and in compiled code. -/
def fast_choose n k := Nat.descFactorial n k / Nat.factorial k
@[csimp] lemma choose_eq_fast_choose : Nat.choose = fast_choose :=
funext (fun _ => funext (Nat.choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial _))
/-! ### Inequalities -/
/-- Show that `Nat.choose` is increasing for small values of the right argument. -/
theorem choose_le_succ_of_lt_half_left {r n : ℕ} (h : r < n / 2) :
choose n r ≤ choose n (r + 1) := by
refine Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt (h.trans_le (n.div_le_self 2)))
rw [← choose_succ_right_eq]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
rw [← Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt, ← Nat.mul_two]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h Nat.zero_lt_two) (n.div_mul_le_self 2)
/-- Show that for small values of the right argument, the middle value is largest. -/
private theorem choose_le_middle_of_le_half_left {n r : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ n / 2) :
choose n r ≤ choose n (n / 2) := by
induction hr using decreasingInduction with
| self => rfl
| of_succ k hk ih => exact (choose_le_succ_of_lt_half_left hk).trans ih
/-- `choose n r` is maximised when `r` is `n/2`. -/
theorem choose_le_middle (r n : ℕ) : choose n r ≤ choose n (n / 2) := by
rcases le_or_gt r n with b | b
· rcases le_or_lt r (n / 2) with a | h
· apply choose_le_middle_of_le_half_left a
· rw [← choose_symm b]
apply choose_le_middle_of_le_half_left
rw [div_lt_iff_lt_mul Nat.zero_lt_two] at h
rw [le_div_iff_mul_le Nat.zero_lt_two, Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add,
← Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add', Nat.mul_two, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
exact le_of_lt h
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt b]
apply zero_le
/-! #### Inequalities about increasing the first argument -/
theorem choose_le_succ (a c : ℕ) : choose a c ≤ choose a.succ c := by
cases c <;> simp [Nat.choose_succ_succ]
theorem choose_le_add (a b c : ℕ) : choose a c ≤ choose (a + b) c := by
induction' b with b_n b_ih
· simp
exact le_trans b_ih (choose_le_succ (a + b_n) c)
theorem choose_le_choose {a b : ℕ} (c : ℕ) (h : a ≤ b) : choose a c ≤ choose b c :=
Nat.add_sub_cancel' h ▸ choose_le_add a (b - a) c
theorem choose_mono (b : ℕ) : Monotone fun a => choose a b := fun _ _ => choose_le_choose b
/-! #### Multichoose
Whereas `choose n k` is the number of subsets of cardinality `k` from a type of cardinality `n`,
`multichoose n k` is the number of multisets of cardinality `k` from a type of cardinality `n`.
Alternatively, whereas `choose n k` counts the number of combinations,
i.e. ways to select `k` items (up to permutation) from `n` items without replacement,
`multichoose n k` counts the number of multicombinations,
i.e. ways to select `k` items (up to permutation) from `n` items with replacement.
Note that `multichoose` is *not* the multinomial coefficient, although it can be computed
in terms of multinomial coefficients. For details see https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multichoose.html
TODO: Prove that `choose (-n) k = (-1)^k * multichoose n k`,
where `choose` is the generalized binomial coefficient.
<https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/15072#issuecomment-1171415738>
-/
/--
`multichoose n k` is the number of multisets of cardinality `k` from a type of cardinality `n`. -/
def multichoose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 =>
multichoose n (k + 1) + multichoose (n + 1) k
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : multichoose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> simp [multichoose]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : multichoose 0 (k + 1) = 0 := by simp [multichoose]
theorem multichoose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) :
multichoose (n + 1) (k + 1) = multichoose n (k + 1) + multichoose (n + 1) k := by
simp [multichoose]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_one (k : ℕ) : multichoose 1 k = 1 := by
induction' k with k IH; · simp
simp [multichoose_succ_succ 0 k, IH]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_two (k : ℕ) : multichoose 2 k = k + 1 := by
induction' k with k IH; · simp
rw [multichoose, IH]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem multichoose_one_right (n : ℕ) : multichoose n 1 = n := by
induction' n with n IH; · simp
simp [multichoose_succ_succ n 0, IH]
theorem multichoose_eq : ∀ n k : ℕ, multichoose n k = (n + k - 1).choose k
| _, 0 => by simp
| 0, k + 1 => by simp
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
have : n + (k + 1) < (n + 1) + (k + 1) := Nat.add_lt_add_right (Nat.lt_succ_self _) _
have : (n + 1) + k < (n + 1) + (k + 1) := Nat.add_lt_add_left (Nat.lt_succ_self _) _
rw [multichoose_succ_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.succ_add_sub_one, ← Nat.add_assoc,
Nat.choose_succ_succ]
simp [multichoose_eq n (k+1), multichoose_eq (n+1) k]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Basic.lean | 391 | 393 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.l2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ContinuousMapDense
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Periodic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.StoneWeierstrass
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
/-!
# Fourier analysis on the additive circle
This file contains basic results on Fourier series for functions on the additive circle
`AddCircle T = ℝ / ℤ • T`.
## Main definitions
* `haarAddCircle`, Haar measure on `AddCircle T`, normalized to have total measure `1`.
Note that this is not the same normalisation
as the standard measure defined in `IntervalIntegral.Periodic`,
so we do not declare it as a `MeasureSpace` instance, to avoid confusion.
* for `n : ℤ`, `fourier n` is the monomial `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`,
bundled as a continuous map from `AddCircle T` to `ℂ`.
* `fourierBasis` is the Hilbert basis of `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` given by the images of the
monomials `fourier n`.
* `fourierCoeff f n`, for `f : AddCircle T → E` (with `E` a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space), is
the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `f`, defined as an integral over `AddCircle T`. The lemma
`fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, a + T]` for any real
`a`.
* `fourierCoeffOn`, for `f : ℝ → E` and `a < b` reals, is the `n`-th Fourier
coefficient of the unique periodic function of period `b - a` which agrees with `f` on `(a, b]`.
The lemma `fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral` expresses this as an integral over `[a, b]`.
## Main statements
The theorem `span_fourier_closure_eq_top` states that the span of the monomials `fourier n` is
dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`, i.e. that its `Submodule.topologicalClosure` is `⊤`. This follows
from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem after checking that the span is a subalgebra, is closed under
conjugation, and separates points.
Using this and general theory on approximation of Lᵖ functions by continuous functions, we deduce
(`span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top`) that for any `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the span of the Fourier monomials is
dense in the Lᵖ space of `AddCircle T`. For `p = 2` we show (`orthonormal_fourier`) that the
monomials are also orthonormal, so they form a Hilbert basis for L², which is named as
`fourierBasis`; in particular, for `L²` functions `f`, the Fourier series of `f` converges to `f`
in the `L²` topology (`hasSum_fourier_series_L2`). Parseval's identity, `tsum_sq_fourierCoeff`, is
a direct consequence.
For continuous maps `f : AddCircle T → ℂ`, the theorem
`hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable` states that if the sequence of Fourier
coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series `∑ (i : ℤ), fourierCoeff f i * fourier i`
converges to `f` in the uniform-convergence topology of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped ENNReal ComplexConjugate Real
open TopologicalSpace ContinuousMap MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Algebra Submodule Set
variable {T : ℝ}
namespace AddCircle
/-! ### Measure on `AddCircle T`
In this file we use the Haar measure on `AddCircle T` normalised to have total measure 1 (which is
**not** the same as the standard measure defined in `Topology.Instances.AddCircle`). -/
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Haar measure on the additive circle, normalised to have total measure 1. -/
def haarAddCircle : Measure (AddCircle T) :=
addHaarMeasure ⊤
-- The `IsAddHaarMeasure` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
Measure.isAddHaarMeasure_addHaarMeasure ⊤
instance : IsProbabilityMeasure (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
IsProbabilityMeasure.mk addHaarMeasure_self
theorem volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle :
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T • (@haarAddCircle T _) :=
rfl
end AddCircle
open AddCircle
section Monomials
/-- The family of exponential monomials `fun x => exp (2 π i n x / T)`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and
considered as bundled continuous maps from `ℝ / ℤ • T` to `ℂ`. -/
def fourier (n : ℤ) : C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toFun x := toCircle (n • x :)
continuous_toFun := continuous_induced_dom.comp <| continuous_toCircle.comp <| continuous_zsmul _
@[simp]
theorem fourier_apply {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier n x = toCircle (n • x :) :=
rfl
-- simp normal form is `fourier_coe_apply'`
theorem fourier_coe_apply {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
fourier n (x : AddCircle T) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [fourier_apply, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe,
Circle.coe_exp, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_div, Complex.ofReal_mul, zsmul_eq_mul,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_intCast]
norm_num
congr 1; ring
@[simp]
theorem fourier_coe_apply' {n : ℤ} {x : ℝ} :
toCircle (n • (x : AddCircle T) :) = Complex.exp (2 * π * Complex.I * n * x / T) := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_coe_apply
-- simp normal form is `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_zero {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 0 x = 1 := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp only [fourier_coe_apply]
norm_num
theorem fourier_zero' {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T 0 = (1 : ℂ) := by
have : fourier 0 x = @toCircle T 0 := by rw [fourier_apply, zero_smul]
rw [← this]; exact fourier_zero
-- simp normal form is *also* `fourier_zero'`
theorem fourier_eval_zero (n : ℤ) : fourier n (0 : AddCircle T) = 1 := by
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_coe_apply, Complex.ofReal_zero, mul_zero,
zero_div, Complex.exp_zero]
theorem fourier_one {x : AddCircle T} : fourier 1 x = toCircle x := by rw [fourier_apply, one_zsmul]
-- simp normal form is `fourier_neg'`
theorem fourier_neg {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (-n) x = conj (fourier n x) := by
induction x using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on
simp_rw [fourier_apply, toCircle]
rw [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul]
simp_rw [Function.Periodic.lift_coe, ← Circle.coe_inv_eq_conj, ← Circle.exp_neg,
neg_smul, mul_neg]
@[simp]
theorem fourier_neg' {n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : @toCircle T (-(n • x)) = conj (fourier n x) := by
rw [← neg_smul, ← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_neg
-- simp normal form is `fourier_add'`
theorem fourier_add {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} : fourier (m+n) x = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
simp_rw [fourier_apply, add_zsmul, toCircle_add, Circle.coe_mul]
@[simp]
theorem fourier_add' {m n : ℤ} {x : AddCircle T} :
toCircle ((m + n) • x :) = fourier m x * fourier n x := by
rw [← fourier_apply]; exact fourier_add
theorem fourier_norm [Fact (0 < T)] (n : ℤ) : ‖@fourier T n‖ = 1 := by
rw [ContinuousMap.norm_eq_iSup_norm]
have : ∀ x : AddCircle T, ‖fourier n x‖ = 1 := fun x => Circle.norm_coe _
simp_rw [this]
exact @ciSup_const _ _ _ Zero.instNonempty _
/-- For `n ≠ 0`, a translation by `T / 2 / n` negates the function `fourier n`. -/
theorem fourier_add_half_inv_index {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hT : 0 < T) (x : AddCircle T) :
@fourier T n (x + ↑(T / 2 / n)) = -fourier n x := by
rw [fourier_apply, zsmul_add, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zsmul, toCircle_add,
Metric.unitSphere.coe_mul]
have : (n : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by simpa using hn
have : (@toCircle T (n • (T / 2 / n) : ℝ) : ℂ) = -1 := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, toCircle, Function.Periodic.lift_coe, Circle.coe_exp]
replace hT := Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hT.ne'
convert Complex.exp_pi_mul_I using 3
field_simp; ring
rw [this]; simp
/-- The star subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` . -/
def fourierSubalgebra : StarSubalgebra ℂ C(AddCircle T, ℂ) where
toSubalgebra := Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range fourier)
star_mem' := by
show Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range (fourier (T := T))) ≤
star (Algebra.adjoin ℂ (range (fourier (T := T))))
refine adjoin_le ?_
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact subset_adjoin ⟨-n, ext fun _ => fourier_neg⟩
/-- The star subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is in fact the
linear span of these functions. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_coe :
Subalgebra.toSubmodule (@fourierSubalgebra T).toSubalgebra = span ℂ (range (@fourier T)) := by
apply adjoin_eq_span_of_subset
refine Subset.trans ?_ Submodule.subset_span
intro x hx
refine Submonoid.closure_induction (fun _ => id) ⟨0, ?_⟩ ?_ hx
· ext1 z; exact fourier_zero
· rintro - - - - ⟨m, rfl⟩ ⟨n, rfl⟩
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
ext1 z
exact fourier_add
/- a post-port refactor made `fourierSubalgebra` into a `StarSubalgebra`, and eliminated
`conjInvariantSubalgebra` entirely, making this lemma irrelevant. -/
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- The subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ`
separates points. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints : (@fourierSubalgebra T).SeparatesPoints := by
intro x y hxy
refine ⟨_, ⟨fourier 1, subset_adjoin ⟨1, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
dsimp only; rw [fourier_one, fourier_one]
contrapose! hxy
rw [Subtype.coe_inj] at hxy
exact injective_toCircle hT.elim.ne' hxy
/-- The subalgebra of `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)` generated by `fourier n` for `n ∈ ℤ` is dense. -/
theorem fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top : (@fourierSubalgebra T).topologicalClosure = ⊤ :=
ContinuousMap.starSubalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints fourierSubalgebra
fourierSubalgebra_separatesPoints
/-- The linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in `C(AddCircle T, ℂ)`. -/
theorem span_fourier_closure_eq_top : (span ℂ (range <| @fourier T)).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [← fourierSubalgebra_coe]
exact congr_arg (Subalgebra.toSubmodule <| StarSubalgebra.toSubalgebra ·)
fourierSubalgebra_closure_eq_top
/-- The family of monomials `fourier n`, parametrized by `n : ℤ` and considered as
elements of the `Lp` space of functions `AddCircle T → ℂ`. -/
abbrev fourierLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) : Lp ℂ p (@haarAddCircle T hT) :=
toLp (E := ℂ) p haarAddCircle ℂ (fourier n)
theorem coeFn_fourierLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (n : ℤ) :
@fourierLp T hT p _ n =ᵐ[haarAddCircle] fourier n :=
coeFn_toLp haarAddCircle (fourier n)
/-- For each `1 ≤ p < ∞`, the linear span of the monomials `fourier n` is dense in
`Lp ℂ p haarAddCircle`. -/
theorem span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top {p : ℝ≥0∞} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hp : p ≠ ∞) :
(span ℂ (range (@fourierLp T _ p _))).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
convert
(ContinuousMap.toLp_denseRange ℂ (@haarAddCircle T hT) ℂ hp).topologicalClosure_map_submodule
span_fourier_closure_eq_top
rw [map_span]
unfold fourierLp
rw [range_comp']
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_coe]
/-- The monomials `fourier n` are an orthonormal set with respect to normalised Haar measure. -/
theorem orthonormal_fourier : Orthonormal ℂ (@fourierLp T _ 2 _) := by
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite]
intro i j
rw [ContinuousMap.inner_toLp (@haarAddCircle T hT) (fourier i) (fourier j)]
simp_rw [← fourier_neg, ← fourier_add]
split_ifs with h
· simp_rw [h, add_neg_cancel]
have : ⇑(@fourier T 0) = (fun _ => 1 : AddCircle T → ℂ) := by ext1; exact fourier_zero
rw [this, integral_const, measureReal_univ_eq_one, Complex.real_smul,
Complex.ofReal_one, mul_one]
have hij : j + -i ≠ 0 := by
exact sub_ne_zero.mpr (Ne.symm h)
convert integral_eq_zero_of_add_right_eq_neg (μ := haarAddCircle)
(fourier_add_half_inv_index hij hT.elim)
end Monomials
section ScopeHT
-- everything from here on needs `0 < T`
variable [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
section fourierCoeff
variable {E : Type} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
/-- The `n`-th Fourier coefficient of a function `AddCircle T → E`, for `E` a complete normed
`ℂ`-vector space, defined as the integral over `AddCircle T` of `fourier (-n) t • f t`. -/
def fourierCoeff (f : AddCircle T → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
∫ t : AddCircle T, fourier (-n) t • f t ∂haarAddCircle
/-- The Fourier coefficients of a function on `AddCircle T` can be computed as an integral
over `[a, a + T]`, for any real `a`. -/
theorem fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral (f : AddCircle T → E) (n : ℤ) (a : ℝ) :
fourierCoeff f n = (1 / T) • ∫ x in a..a + T, @fourier T (-n) x • f x := by
have : ∀ x : ℝ, @fourier T (-n) x • f x = (fun z : AddCircle T => @fourier T (-n) z • f z) x := by
intro x; rfl
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3124, we need to add `singlePass := true` to avoid an infinite loop.
simp_rw +singlePass [this]
rw [fourierCoeff, AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage T a (fun z => _ • _),
volume_eq_smul_haarAddCircle, integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hT.out.le,
← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hT.out.ne', one_smul]
theorem fourierCoeff.const_smul (f : AddCircle T → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (c • f :) n = c • fourierCoeff f n := by
simp_rw [fourierCoeff, Pi.smul_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul,
smul_assoc, integral_smul]
theorem fourierCoeff.const_mul (f : AddCircle T → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (fun x => c * f x) n = c * fourierCoeff f n :=
fourierCoeff.const_smul f c n
/-- For a function on `ℝ`, the Fourier coefficients of `f` on `[a, b]` are defined as the
Fourier coefficients of the unique periodic function agreeing with `f` on `Ioc a b`. -/
def fourierCoeffOn {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) : E :=
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIoc (b - a) a f) n
theorem fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab f n =
(1 / (b - a)) • ∫ x in a..b, fourier (-n) (x : AddCircle (b - a)) • f x := by
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
rw [fourierCoeffOn, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ _ a, add_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
congr 1
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le hab.le]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
rw [liftIoc_coe_apply]
rwa [add_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
theorem fourierCoeffOn.const_smul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → E) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab (c • f) n = c • fourierCoeffOn hab f n := by
haveI := Fact.mk (by linarith : 0 < b - a)
apply fourierCoeff.const_smul
theorem fourierCoeffOn.const_mul {a b : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (c : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (hab : a < b) :
fourierCoeffOn hab (fun x => c * f x) n = c * fourierCoeffOn hab f n :=
fourierCoeffOn.const_smul _ _ _ _
theorem fourierCoeff_liftIoc_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIoc T a f) n =
fourierCoeffOn (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n := by
rw [fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral, add_sub_cancel_left a T]
· congr 1
refine intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae (ae_of_all _ fun x hx => ?_)
rw [liftIoc_coe_apply]
rwa [uIoc_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le] at hx
theorem fourierCoeff_liftIco_eq {a : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (AddCircle.liftIco T a f) n =
fourierCoeffOn (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out) f n := by
rw [fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ _ a, add_sub_cancel_left a T]
congr 1
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right a hT.out).le]
iterate 2 rw [integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioo fun x hx => ?_
rw [liftIco_coe_apply (Ioo_subset_Ico_self hx)]
end fourierCoeff
section FourierL2
/-- We define `fourierBasis` to be a `ℤ`-indexed Hilbert basis for `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle`,
which by definition is an isometric isomorphism from `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` to `ℓ²(ℤ, ℂ)`. -/
def fourierBasis : HilbertBasis ℤ ℂ (Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) :=
HilbertBasis.mk orthonormal_fourier (span_fourierLp_closure_eq_top (by norm_num)).ge
/-- The elements of the Hilbert basis `fourierBasis` are the functions `fourierLp 2`, i.e. the
monomials `fourier n` on the circle considered as elements of `L²`. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_fourierBasis : ⇑(@fourierBasis T hT) = @fourierLp T hT 2 _ :=
HilbertBasis.coe_mk _ _
/-- Under the isometric isomorphism `fourierBasis` from `Lp ℂ 2 haarAddCircle` to `ℓ²(ℤ, ℂ)`, the
`i`-th coefficient is `fourierCoeff f i`, i.e., the integral over `AddCircle T` of
`fun t => fourier (-i) t * f t` with respect to the Haar measure of total mass 1. -/
theorem fourierBasis_repr (f : Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) (i : ℤ) :
fourierBasis.repr f i = fourierCoeff f i := by
trans ∫ t : AddCircle T, conj ((@fourierLp T hT 2 _ i : AddCircle T → ℂ) t) * f t ∂haarAddCircle
· rw [fourierBasis.repr_apply_apply f i, MeasureTheory.L2.inner_def, coe_fourierBasis]
simp only [RCLike.inner_apply']
· apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [coeFn_fourierLp 2 i] with _ ht
rw [ht, ← fourier_neg, smul_eq_mul]
/-- The Fourier series of an `L2` function `f` sums to `f`, in the `L²` space of `AddCircle T`. -/
theorem hasSum_fourier_series_L2 (f : Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) :
HasSum (fun i => fourierCoeff f i • fourierLp 2 i) f := by
simp_rw [← fourierBasis_repr]; rw [← coe_fourierBasis]
exact HilbertBasis.hasSum_repr fourierBasis f
/-- **Parseval's identity**: for an `L²` function `f` on `AddCircle T`, the sum of the squared
norms of the Fourier coefficients equals the `L²` norm of `f`. -/
theorem tsum_sq_fourierCoeff (f : Lp ℂ 2 <| @haarAddCircle T hT) :
∑' i : ℤ, ‖fourierCoeff f i‖ ^ 2 = ∫ t : AddCircle T, ‖f t‖ ^ 2 ∂haarAddCircle := by
simp_rw [← fourierBasis_repr]
have H₁ : ‖fourierBasis.repr f‖ ^ 2 = ∑' i, ‖fourierBasis.repr f i‖ ^ 2 := by
apply_mod_cast lp.norm_rpow_eq_tsum ?_ (fourierBasis.repr f)
norm_num
have H₂ : ‖fourierBasis.repr f‖ ^ 2 = ‖f‖ ^ 2 := by simp
have H₃ := congr_arg RCLike.re (@L2.inner_def (AddCircle T) ℂ ℂ _ _ _ _ _ f f)
rw [← integral_re] at H₃
· simp only [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner] at H₃
rw [← H₁, H₂, H₃]
· exact L2.integrable_inner f f
end FourierL2
section Convergence
variable (f : C(AddCircle T, ℂ))
theorem fourierCoeff_toLp (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff (toLp (E := ℂ) 2 haarAddCircle ℂ f) n = fourierCoeff f n :=
integral_congr_ae (Filter.EventuallyEq.mul (Filter.Eventually.of_forall (by tauto))
(ContinuousMap.coeFn_toAEEqFun haarAddCircle f))
variable {f}
/-- If the sequence of Fourier coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series converges
uniformly to `f`. -/
theorem hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable (h : Summable (fourierCoeff f)) :
HasSum (fun i => fourierCoeff f i • fourier i) f := by
have sum_L2 := hasSum_fourier_series_L2 (toLp (E := ℂ) 2 haarAddCircle ℂ f)
simp_rw [fourierCoeff_toLp] at sum_L2
refine ContinuousMap.hasSum_of_hasSum_Lp (.of_norm ?_) sum_L2
simp_rw [norm_smul, fourier_norm, mul_one]
exact h.norm
/-- If the sequence of Fourier coefficients of `f` is summable, then the Fourier series of `f`
converges everywhere pointwise to `f`. -/
theorem has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable (h : Summable (fourierCoeff f))
(x : AddCircle T) : HasSum (fun i => fourierCoeff f i • fourier i x) (f x) := by
convert (ContinuousMap.evalCLM ℂ x).hasSum (hasSum_fourier_series_of_summable h)
|
end Convergence
end ScopeHT
section deriv
open Complex intervalIntegral
open scoped Interval
variable (T)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/AddCircle.lean | 428 | 439 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
open Classical in
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hf, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_right_inj₀]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
have hfg := mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg
simp only [hfg, hf, hg, dite_false]
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _ |>.not
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q := by
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· simp [norm]
· simp [norm, not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq]
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hfg _ hpn
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases lt_or_le (padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg))) (padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
| inl hlt =>
exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
| inr hle =>
apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hle h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
exact if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦
hf <| equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
let i := max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg)
have hpf : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
have hpg : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) = padicNorm p (g i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
theorem norm_neg (a : PadicSeq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq <| by simp
theorem norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm := by
have : LimZero (f + g - 0) := h
have : f ≈ -g := show LimZero (f - -g) by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
have : f.norm = (-g).norm := norm_equiv this
simpa only [norm_neg] using this
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0 := mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : f + g ≈ g := show LimZero (f + g - g) by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (g - 0) := hg
have : f + g ≈ f := show LimZero (f + g - f) by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)]
else by
unfold norm at hfgne ⊢; split_ifs at hfgne ⊢
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at hfgne ⊢`
rw [lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg] at hfgne
· rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
exact padicNorm.add_eq_max_of_ne hfgne
|
end Embedding
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 422 | 423 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Iterate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
(cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[simp]
| theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
cases z with
| ofNat z => exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
| negSucc z =>
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 66 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Continuous
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Induced
/-!
# Ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies
Topologies on a fixed type `α` are ordered, by reverse inclusion. That is, for topologies `t₁` and
`t₂` on `α`, we write `t₁ ≤ t₂` if every set open in `t₂` is also open in `t₁`. (One also calls
`t₁` *finer* than `t₂`, and `t₂` *coarser* than `t₁`.)
Any function `f : α → β` induces
* `TopologicalSpace.induced f : TopologicalSpace β → TopologicalSpace α`;
* `TopologicalSpace.coinduced f : TopologicalSpace α → TopologicalSpace β`.
Continuity, the ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies are related as follows:
* The identity map `(α, t₁) → (α, t₂)` is continuous iff `t₁ ≤ t₂`.
* A map `f : (α, t) → (β, u)` is continuous
* iff `t ≤ TopologicalSpace.induced f u` (`continuous_iff_le_induced`)
* iff `TopologicalSpace.coinduced f t ≤ u` (`continuous_iff_coinduced_le`).
Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology and `⊤` the indiscrete
topology.
For a function `f : α → β`, `(TopologicalSpace.coinduced f, TopologicalSpace.induced f)` is a Galois
connection between topologies on `α` and topologies on `β`.
## Implementation notes
There is a Galois insertion between topologies on `α` (with the inclusion ordering) and all
collections of sets in `α`. The complete lattice structure on topologies on `α` is defined as the
reverse of the one obtained via this Galois insertion. More precisely, we use the corresponding
Galois coinsertion between topologies on `α` (with the reversed inclusion ordering) and collections
of sets in `α` (with the reversed inclusion ordering).
## Tags
finer, coarser, induced topology, coinduced topology
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology
universe u v w
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u}
/-- The open sets of the least topology containing a collection of basic sets. -/
inductive GenerateOpen (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ s ∈ g, GenerateOpen g s
| univ : GenerateOpen g univ
| inter : ∀ s t, GenerateOpen g s → GenerateOpen g t → GenerateOpen g (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, GenerateOpen g s) → GenerateOpen g (⋃₀ S)
/-- The smallest topological space containing the collection `g` of basic sets -/
def generateFrom (g : Set (Set α)) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen := GenerateOpen g
isOpen_univ := GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := GenerateOpen.sUnion
theorem isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem {g : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ g) :
IsOpen[generateFrom g] s :=
GenerateOpen.basic s hs
theorem nhds_generateFrom {g : Set (Set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generateFrom g) a = ⨅ s ∈ { s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g }, 𝓟 s := by
letI := generateFrom g
rw [nhds_def]
refine le_antisymm (biInf_mono fun s ⟨as, sg⟩ => ⟨as, .basic _ sg⟩) <| le_iInf₂ ?_
rintro s ⟨ha, hs⟩
induction hs with
| basic _ hs => exact iInf₂_le _ ⟨ha, hs⟩
| univ => exact le_top.trans_eq principal_univ.symm
| inter _ _ _ _ hs ht => exact (le_inf (hs ha.1) (ht ha.2)).trans_eq inf_principal
| sUnion _ _ hS =>
let ⟨t, htS, hat⟩ := ha
exact (hS t htS hat).trans (principal_mono.2 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem htS)
lemma tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Set (Set β)}
{b : β} : Tendsto m f (@nhds β (generateFrom g) b) ↔ ∀ s ∈ g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f := by
simp only [nhds_generateFrom, @forall_swap (b ∈ _), tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
tendsto_principal]; rfl
/-- Construct a topology on α given the filter of neighborhoods of each point of α. -/
protected def mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := ∀ a ∈ s, s ∈ n a
isOpen_univ _ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩ => inter_mem (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _s hs _a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hx)
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis {n : α → Filter α} {ι : α → Sort*} {p : ∀ a, ι a → Prop}
{s : ∀ a, ι a → Set α} (hb : ∀ a, (n a).HasBasis (p a) (s a))
(hpure : ∀ a i, p a i → a ∈ s a i) (hopen : ∀ a i, p a i → ∀ᶠ x in n a, s a i ∈ n x) (a : α) :
@nhds α (.mkOfNhds n) a = n a := by
let t : TopologicalSpace α := .mkOfNhds n
apply le_antisymm
· intro U hU
replace hpure : pure ≤ n := fun x ↦ (hb x).ge_iff.2 (hpure x)
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨{x | U ∈ n x}, fun x hx ↦ hpure x hx, fun x hx ↦ ?_, hU⟩
rcases (hb x).mem_iff.1 hx with ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩
exact (hopen x i hpi).mono fun y hy ↦ mem_of_superset hy hi
· exact (nhds_basis_opens a).ge_iff.2 fun U ⟨haU, hUo⟩ ↦ hUo a haU
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) (a : α) (h₀ : pure ≤ n)
(h₁ : ∀ a, ∀ s ∈ n a, ∀ᶠ y in n a, s ∈ n y) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds n) a = n a :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (n a).basis_sets) h₀ h₁ _
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_single [DecidableEq α] {a₀ : α} {l : Filter α} (h : pure a₀ ≤ l) (b : α) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds (update pure a₀ l)) b =
(update pure a₀ l : α → Filter α) b := by
refine nhds_mkOfNhds _ _ (le_update_iff.mpr ⟨h, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩) fun a s hs => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne a a₀ with (rfl | ha)
· filter_upwards [hs] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne b a with (rfl | hb)
· exact hs
· rwa [update_of_ne hb]
· simpa only [update_of_ne ha, mem_pure, eventually_pure] using hs
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_filterBasis (B : α → FilterBasis α) (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ x, ∀ n ∈ B x, x ∈ n)
(h₁ : ∀ x, ∀ n ∈ B x, ∃ n₁ ∈ B x, ∀ x' ∈ n₁, ∃ n₂ ∈ B x', n₂ ⊆ n) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds fun x => (B x).filter) a = (B a).filter :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (B a).hasBasis) h₀ h₁ a
section Lattice
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- The ordering on topologies on the type `α`. `t ≤ s` if every set open in `s` is also open in `t`
(`t` is finer than `s`). -/
instance : PartialOrder (TopologicalSpace α) :=
{ PartialOrder.lift (fun t => OrderDual.toDual IsOpen[t]) (fun _ _ => TopologicalSpace.ext) with
le := fun s t => ∀ U, IsOpen[t] U → IsOpen[s] U }
protected theorem le_def {α} {t s : TopologicalSpace α} : t ≤ s ↔ IsOpen[s] ≤ IsOpen[t] :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen {g : Set (Set α)} {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
t ≤ generateFrom g ↔ g ⊆ { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
⟨fun ht s hs => ht _ <| .basic s hs, fun hg _s hs =>
hs.recOn (fun _ h => hg h) isOpen_univ (fun _ _ _ _ => IsOpen.inter) fun _ _ => isOpen_sUnion⟩
/-- If `s` equals the collection of open sets in the topology it generates, then `s` defines a
topology. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : { u | GenerateOpen s u } = s) :
TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen u := u ∈ s
isOpen_univ := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.sUnion
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : { u | GenerateOpen s u } = s} :
TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure s hs = generateFrom s :=
TopologicalSpace.ext hs.symm
theorem gc_generateFrom (α) :
GaloisConnection (fun t : TopologicalSpace α => OrderDual.toDual { s | IsOpen[t] s })
(generateFrom ∘ OrderDual.ofDual) := fun _ _ =>
le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.symm
/-- The Galois coinsertion between `TopologicalSpace α` and `(Set (Set α))ᵒᵈ` whose lower part sends
a topology to its collection of open subsets, and whose upper part sends a collection of subsets
of `α` to the topology they generate. -/
def gciGenerateFrom (α : Type*) :
GaloisCoinsertion (fun t : TopologicalSpace α => OrderDual.toDual { s | IsOpen[t] s })
(generateFrom ∘ OrderDual.ofDual) where
gc := gc_generateFrom α
u_l_le _ s hs := TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.basic s hs
choice g hg := TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure g
(Subset.antisymm hg <| le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology
and `⊤` the indiscrete topology. The infimum of a collection of topologies
is the topology generated by all their open sets, while the supremum is the
topology whose open sets are those sets open in every member of the collection. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (TopologicalSpace α) := (gciGenerateFrom α).liftCompleteLattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem generateFrom_anti {α} {g₁ g₂ : Set (Set α)} (h : g₁ ⊆ g₂) :
generateFrom g₂ ≤ generateFrom g₁ :=
(gc_generateFrom _).monotone_u h
theorem generateFrom_setOf_isOpen (t : TopologicalSpace α) :
generateFrom { s | IsOpen[t] s } = t :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_l_eq t
theorem leftInverse_generateFrom :
LeftInverse generateFrom fun t : TopologicalSpace α => { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_l_leftInverse
theorem generateFrom_surjective : Surjective (generateFrom : Set (Set α) → TopologicalSpace α) :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_surjective
theorem setOf_isOpen_injective : Injective fun t : TopologicalSpace α => { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).l_injective
end Lattice
end TopologicalSpace
section Lattice
variable {α : Type*} {t t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set α}
theorem IsOpen.mono (hs : IsOpen[t₂] s) (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : IsOpen[t₁] s := h s hs
theorem IsClosed.mono (hs : IsClosed[t₂] s) (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : IsClosed[t₁] s :=
(@isOpen_compl_iff α s t₁).mp <| hs.isOpen_compl.mono h
theorem closure.mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : closure[t₁] s ⊆ closure[t₂] s :=
@closure_minimal _ t₁ s (@closure _ t₂ s) subset_closure (IsClosed.mono isClosed_closure h)
theorem isOpen_implies_isOpen_iff : (∀ s, IsOpen[t₁] s → IsOpen[t₂] s) ↔ t₂ ≤ t₁ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The only open sets in the indiscrete topology are the empty set and the whole space. -/
theorem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_top_iff {α} (U : Set α) : IsOpen[⊤] U ↔ U = ∅ ∨ U = univ :=
⟨fun h => by
induction h with
| basic _ h => exact False.elim h
| univ => exact .inr rfl
| inter _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ =>
rcases h₁ with (rfl | rfl) <;> rcases h₂ with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
| sUnion _ _ ih => exact sUnion_mem_empty_univ ih, by
rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [@isOpen_empty _ ⊤, @isOpen_univ _ ⊤]⟩
/-- A topological space is discrete if every set is open, that is,
its topology equals the discrete topology `⊥`. -/
class DiscreteTopology (α : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The `TopologicalSpace` structure on a type with discrete topology is equal to `⊥`. -/
eq_bot : t = ⊥
theorem discreteTopology_bot (α : Type*) : @DiscreteTopology α ⊥ :=
@DiscreteTopology.mk α ⊥ rfl
section DiscreteTopology
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] {β : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_discrete (s : Set α) : IsOpen s := (@DiscreteTopology.eq_bot α _).symm ▸ trivial
@[simp] theorem isClosed_discrete (s : Set α) : IsClosed s := ⟨isOpen_discrete _⟩
theorem closure_discrete (s : Set α) : closure s = s := (isClosed_discrete _).closure_eq
@[simp] theorem dense_discrete {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ s = univ := by simp [dense_iff_closure_eq]
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_discrete {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} : DenseRange f ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [DenseRange, dense_discrete, range_eq_univ]
@[nontriviality, continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} : Continuous f :=
continuous_def.2 fun _ _ => isOpen_discrete _
/-- A function to a discrete topological space is continuous if and only if the preimage of every
singleton is open. -/
theorem continuous_discrete_rng {α} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ∀ b : β, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' {b}) :=
⟨fun h _ => (isOpen_discrete _).preimage h, fun h => ⟨fun s _ => by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => h _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nhds_discrete (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] : @nhds α _ = pure :=
le_antisymm (fun _ s hs => (isOpen_discrete s).mem_nhds hs) pure_le_nhds
theorem mem_nhds_discrete {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s := by rw [nhds_discrete, mem_pure]
end DiscreteTopology
theorem le_of_nhds_le_nhds (h : ∀ x, @nhds α t₁ x ≤ @nhds α t₂ x) : t₁ ≤ t₂ := fun s => by
rw [@isOpen_iff_mem_nhds _ t₁, @isOpen_iff_mem_nhds _ t₂]
exact fun hs a ha => h _ (hs _ ha)
theorem eq_bot_of_singletons_open {t : TopologicalSpace α} (h : ∀ x, IsOpen[t] {x}) : t = ⊥ :=
| bot_unique fun s _ => biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ isOpen_biUnion fun x _ => h x
| Mathlib/Topology/Order.lean | 290 | 290 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# `norm_num` plugin for big operators
This file adds `norm_num` plugins for `Finset.prod` and `Finset.sum`.
The driving part of this plugin is `Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.evalFinsetBigop`.
We repeatedly use `Finset.proveEmptyOrCons` to try to find a proof that the given set is empty,
or that it consists of one element inserted into a strict subset, and evaluate the big operator
on that subset until the set is completely exhausted.
## See also
* The `fin_cases` tactic has similar scope: splitting out a finite collection into its elements.
## Porting notes
This plugin is noticeably less powerful than the equivalent version in Mathlib 3: the design of
`norm_num` means plugins have to return numerals, rather than a generic expression.
In particular, we can't use the plugin on sums containing variables.
(See also the TODO note "To support variables".)
## TODO
* Support intervals: `Finset.Ico`, `Finset.Icc`, ...
* To support variables, like in Mathlib 3, turn this into a standalone tactic that unfolds
the sum/prod, without computing its numeric value (using the `ring` tactic to do some
normalization?)
-/
namespace Mathlib.Meta
open Lean
open Meta
open Qq
variable {u v : Level}
/-- This represents the result of trying to determine whether the given expression `n : Q(ℕ)`
is either `zero` or `succ`. -/
inductive Nat.UnifyZeroOrSuccResult (n : Q(ℕ))
/-- `n` unifies with `0` -/
| zero (pf : $n =Q 0)
/-- `n` unifies with `succ n'` for this specific `n'` -/
| succ (n' : Q(ℕ)) (pf : $n =Q Nat.succ $n')
/-- Determine whether the expression `n : Q(ℕ)` unifies with `0` or `Nat.succ n'`.
We do not use `norm_num` functionality because we want definitional equality,
not propositional equality, for use in dependent types.
Fails if neither of the options succeed.
-/
def Nat.unifyZeroOrSucc (n : Q(ℕ)) : MetaM (Nat.UnifyZeroOrSuccResult n) := do
match ← isDefEqQ n q(0) with
| .defEq pf => return .zero pf
| .notDefEq => do
let n' : Q(ℕ) ← mkFreshExprMVar q(ℕ)
let ⟨(_pf : $n =Q Nat.succ $n')⟩ ← assertDefEqQ n q(Nat.succ $n')
let (.some (n'_val : Q(ℕ))) ← getExprMVarAssignment? n'.mvarId! |
throwError "could not figure out value of `?n` from `{n} =?= Nat.succ ?n`"
pure (.succ n'_val ⟨⟩)
/-- This represents the result of trying to determine whether the given expression
`s : Q(List $α)` is either empty or consists of an element inserted into a strict subset. -/
inductive List.ProveNilOrConsResult {α : Q(Type u)} (s : Q(List $α))
/-- The set is Nil. -/
| nil (pf : Q($s = []))
/-- The set equals `a` inserted into the strict subset `s'`. -/
| cons (a : Q($α)) (s' : Q(List $α)) (pf : Q($s = List.cons $a $s'))
/-- If `s` unifies with `t`, convert a result for `s` to a result for `t`.
If `s` does not unify with `t`, this results in a type-incorrect proof.
-/
def List.ProveNilOrConsResult.uncheckedCast {α : Q(Type u)} {β : Q(Type v)}
(s : Q(List $α)) (t : Q(List $β)) :
List.ProveNilOrConsResult s → List.ProveNilOrConsResult t
| .nil pf => .nil pf
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a s' pf
/-- If `s = t` and we can get the result for `t`, then we can get the result for `s`.
-/
def List.ProveNilOrConsResult.eq_trans {α : Q(Type u)} {s t : Q(List $α)}
(eq : Q($s = $t)) :
List.ProveNilOrConsResult t → List.ProveNilOrConsResult s
| .nil pf => .nil q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
| .cons a s' pf => .cons a s' q(Eq.trans $eq $pf)
lemma List.range_zero' {n : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n 0) :
List.range n = [] := by rw [pn.out, Nat.cast_zero, List.range_zero]
|
lemma List.range_succ_eq_map' {n nn n' : ℕ} (pn : NormNum.IsNat n nn) (pn' : nn = Nat.succ n') :
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/BigOperators.lean | 100 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Hom
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps.Proper.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
Finally, `f : α → β` is called *locally Lipschitz continuous* if each `x : α` has a neighbourhood
on which `f` is Lipschitz continuous (with some constant).
In this file we specialize various facts about Lipschitz continuous maps
to the case of (pseudo) metric spaces.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis Ideal
universe u v w x
open Filter Function Set Topology NNReal ENNReal Bornology
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} : LipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y := by
simp only [LipschitzWith, edist_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.dist_le_mul, LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y := by
simp only [LipschitzOnWith, edist_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.dist_le_mul, LipschitzOnWith.of_dist_le_mul⟩ :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul
namespace LipschitzWith
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [PseudoMetricSpace γ] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
{x y : α} {r : ℝ}
protected theorem of_dist_le' {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f :=
of_dist_le_mul fun x y =>
le_trans (h x y) <| by gcongr; apply Real.le_coe_toNNReal
protected theorem mk_one (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
of_dist_le_mul <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ) (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f :=
have I : ∀ x y, f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y := fun x y => sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x y)
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x y, dist_comm y x ▸ I y x⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith K f := by simpa only [Real.toNNReal_coe] using LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected theorem of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + dist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul 1 <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected theorem le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y) :
f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_trans (le_abs_self _) <| h.dist_le_mul x y
protected theorem iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
⟨LipschitzWith.le_add_mul, LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul K⟩
theorem nndist_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : nndist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * nndist x y :=
hf.dist_le_mul x y
theorem dist_le_mul_of_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (hr : dist x y ≤ r) : dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(hf.dist_le_mul x y).trans <| by gcongr
theorem mapsTo_closedBall (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.closedBall x r) (Metric.closedBall (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy =>
hf.dist_le_mul_of_le hy
theorem dist_lt_mul_of_lt (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : dist x y < r) :
dist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(hf.dist_le_mul x y).trans_lt <| (mul_lt_mul_left <| NNReal.coe_pos.2 hK.bot_lt).2 hr
theorem mapsTo_ball (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.ball x r) (Metric.ball (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy =>
hf.dist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
/-- A Lipschitz continuous map is a locally bounded map. -/
def toLocallyBoundedMap (f : α → β) (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : LocallyBoundedMap α β :=
LocallyBoundedMap.ofMapBounded f fun _s hs =>
let ⟨C, hC⟩ := Metric.isBounded_iff.1 hs
Metric.isBounded_iff.2 ⟨K * C, forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx => forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy =>
hf.dist_le_mul_of_le (hC hx hy)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLocallyBoundedMap (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : ⇑(hf.toLocallyBoundedMap f) = f :=
rfl
theorem comap_cobounded_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) :
comap f (Bornology.cobounded β) ≤ Bornology.cobounded α :=
(hf.toLocallyBoundedMap f).2
/-- The image of a bounded set under a Lipschitz map is bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_image (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {s : Set α} (hs : IsBounded s) :
IsBounded (f '' s) :=
hs.image (toLocallyBoundedMap f hf)
theorem diam_image_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) (hs : IsBounded s) :
Metric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * Metric.diam s :=
Metric.diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg K.coe_nonneg Metric.diam_nonneg) <|
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx =>
forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy => hf.dist_le_mul_of_le <| Metric.dist_le_diam_of_mem hs hx hy
protected theorem dist_left (y : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (dist · y) :=
LipschitzWith.mk_one fun _ _ => dist_dist_dist_le_left _ _ _
protected theorem dist_right (x : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (dist x) :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => dist_triangle_right _ _ _
protected theorem dist : LipschitzWith 2 (Function.uncurry <| @dist α _) := by
rw [← one_add_one_eq_two]
exact LipschitzWith.uncurry LipschitzWith.dist_left LipschitzWith.dist_right
theorem dist_iterate_succ_le_geometric {f : α → α} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (x n) :
dist (f^[n] x) (f^[n + 1] x) ≤ dist x (f x) * (K : ℝ) ^ n := by
rw [iterate_succ, mul_comm]
simpa only [NNReal.coe_pow] using (hf.iterate n).dist_le_mul x (f x)
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_max : LipschitzWith 1 fun p : ℝ × ℝ => max p.1 p.2 :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <|
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_max_sub_max_le_max _ _ _ _)
theorem _root_.lipschitzWith_min : LipschitzWith 1 fun p : ℝ × ℝ => min p.1 p.2 :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <|
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_min_sub_min_le_max _ _ _ _)
lemma _root_.Real.lipschitzWith_toNNReal : LipschitzWith 1 Real.toNNReal := by
refine lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul.mpr (fun x y ↦ ?_)
simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, dist_prod_same_right, one_mul, Real.dist_eq] using
lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul.mp lipschitzWith_max (x, 0) (y, 0)
lemma cauchySeq_comp (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {u : ℕ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) :
CauchySeq (f ∘ u) := by
rcases cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.1 hu with ⟨b, b_nonneg, hb, blim⟩
refine cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨fun n ↦ K * b n, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun n ↦ mul_nonneg (by positivity) (b_nonneg n)
· exact fun n m N hn hm ↦ hf.dist_le_mul_of_le (hb n m N hn hm)
· rw [← mul_zero (K : ℝ)]
exact blim.const_mul _
end Metric
section EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ} {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem max (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => max (f x) (g x) := by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), one_mul] using lipschitzWith_max.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
protected theorem min (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) :
LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => min (f x) (g x) := by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), one_mul] using lipschitzWith_min.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem max_const (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => max (f x) a := by
simpa only [max_eq_left (zero_le Kf)] using hf.max (LipschitzWith.const a)
theorem const_max (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => max a (f x) := by
simpa only [max_comm] using hf.max_const a
theorem min_const (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => min (f x) a := by
simpa only [max_eq_left (zero_le Kf)] using hf.min (LipschitzWith.const a)
theorem const_min (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (a : ℝ) : LipschitzWith Kf fun x => min a (f x) := by
simpa only [min_comm] using hf.min_const a
end EMetric
protected theorem projIcc {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) : LipschitzWith 1 (projIcc a b h) :=
((LipschitzWith.id.const_min _).const_max _).subtype_mk _
end LipschitzWith
/-- The preimage of a proper space under a Lipschitz proper map is proper. -/
lemma LipschitzWith.properSpace {X Y : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
[PseudoMetricSpace Y] [ProperSpace Y] {f : X → Y} (hf : IsProperMap f)
{K : ℝ≥0} (hf' : LipschitzWith K f) : ProperSpace X :=
⟨fun x r ↦ (hf.isCompact_preimage (isCompact_closedBall (f x) (K * r))).of_isClosed_subset
Metric.isClosed_closedBall (hf'.mapsTo_closedBall x r).subset_preimage⟩
namespace Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
end Metric
namespace LipschitzOnWith
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [PseudoMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
protected theorem of_dist_le' {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
LipschitzOnWith (Real.toNNReal K) f s :=
of_dist_le_mul fun x hx y hy =>
le_trans (h x hx y hy) <| by gcongr; apply Real.le_coe_toNNReal
protected theorem mk_one (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) :
LipschitzOnWith 1 f s :=
of_dist_le_mul <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) : LipschitzOnWith (Real.toNNReal K) f s :=
have I : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y := fun x hx y hy =>
sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x hx y hy)
LipschitzOnWith.of_dist_le' fun x hx y hy =>
abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x hx y hy, dist_comm y x ▸ I y hy x hx⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) : LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
simpa only [Real.toNNReal_coe] using LipschitzOnWith.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected theorem of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≤ f y + dist x y) :
LipschitzOnWith 1 f s :=
LipschitzOnWith.of_le_add_mul 1 <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected theorem le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith K f s) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s)
{y : α} (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_trans (le_abs_self _) <| h.dist_le_mul x hx y hy
protected theorem iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
⟨LipschitzOnWith.le_add_mul, LipschitzOnWith.of_le_add_mul K⟩
theorem isBounded_image2 (f : α → β → γ) {K₁ K₂ : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(hs : Bornology.IsBounded s) (ht : Bornology.IsBounded t)
(hf₁ : ∀ b ∈ t, LipschitzOnWith K₁ (fun a => f a b) s)
(hf₂ : ∀ a ∈ s, LipschitzOnWith K₂ (f a) t) : Bornology.IsBounded (Set.image2 f s t) :=
Metric.isBounded_iff_ediam_ne_top.2 <|
ne_top_of_le_ne_top
(ENNReal.add_ne_top.mpr
⟨ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top hs.ediam_ne_top,
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top ht.ediam_ne_top⟩)
(ediam_image2_le _ _ _ hf₁ hf₂)
lemma cauchySeq_comp (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s)
{u : ℕ → α} (hu : CauchySeq u) (h'u : range u ⊆ s) :
CauchySeq (f ∘ u) := by
rcases cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.1 hu with ⟨b, b_nonneg, hb, blim⟩
refine cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0.2 ⟨fun n ↦ K * b n, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun n ↦ mul_nonneg (by positivity) (b_nonneg n)
· intro n m N hn hm
have A n : u n ∈ s := h'u (mem_range_self _)
apply (hf.dist_le_mul _ (A n) _ (A m)).trans
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hb n m N hn hm) K.2
· rw [← mul_zero (K : ℝ)]
exact blim.const_mul _
end Metric
end LipschitzOnWith
namespace LocallyLipschitz
section Real
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ}
/-- The minimum of locally Lipschitz functions is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma min (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) :
LocallyLipschitz (fun x => min (f x) (g x)) :=
lipschitzWith_min.locallyLipschitz.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
/-- The maximum of locally Lipschitz functions is locally Lipschitz. -/
protected lemma max (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (hg : LocallyLipschitz g) :
LocallyLipschitz (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) :=
lipschitzWith_max.locallyLipschitz.comp (hf.prodMk hg)
theorem max_const (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (a : ℝ) : LocallyLipschitz fun x => max (f x) a :=
hf.max (LocallyLipschitz.const a)
theorem const_max (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (a : ℝ) : LocallyLipschitz fun x => max a (f x) := by
simpa [max_comm] using (hf.max_const a)
theorem min_const (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (a : ℝ) : LocallyLipschitz fun x => min (f x) a :=
hf.min (LocallyLipschitz.const a)
theorem const_min (hf : LocallyLipschitz f) (a : ℝ) : LocallyLipschitz fun x => min a (f x) := by
simpa [min_comm] using (hf.min_const a)
end Real
end LocallyLipschitz
open Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- If a function is locally Lipschitz around a point, then it is continuous at this point. -/
theorem continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz {x : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (K : ℝ)
(h : ∀ y, dist y x < r → dist (f y) (f x) ≤ K * dist y x) : ContinuousAt f x := by
-- We use `h` to squeeze `dist (f y) (f x)` between `0` and `K * dist y x`
refine tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 (squeeze_zero' (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => dist_nonneg)
(mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ hr) h) ?_)
-- Then show that `K * dist y x` tends to zero as `y → x`
refine (continuous_const.mul (continuous_id.dist continuous_const)).tendsto' _ _ ?_
simp
/-- A function `f : α → ℝ` which is `K`-Lipschitz on a subset `s` admits a `K`-Lipschitz extension
to the whole space. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.extend_real {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) :
∃ g : α → ℝ, LipschitzWith K g ∧ EqOn f g s := by
/- An extension is given by `g y = Inf {f x + K * dist y x | x ∈ s}`. Taking `x = y`, one has
`g y ≤ f y` for `y ∈ s`, and the other inequality holds because `f` is `K`-Lipschitz, so that it
can not counterbalance the growth of `K * dist y x`. One readily checks from the formula that
the extended function is also `K`-Lipschitz. -/
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· exact ⟨fun _ => 0, (LipschitzWith.const _).weaken (zero_le _), eqOn_empty _ _⟩
have : Nonempty s := by simp only [hs, nonempty_coe_sort]
let g := fun y : α => iInf fun x : s => f x + K * dist y x
have B : ∀ y : α, BddBelow (range fun x : s => f x + K * dist y x) := fun y => by
rcases hs with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨f z - K * dist y z, ?_⟩
| rintro w ⟨t, rfl⟩
dsimp
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Lipschitz.lean | 354 | 355 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Adapted
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Stopping times, stopped processes and stopped values
Definition and properties of stopping times.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime`: a stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a
function `τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is
`f i`-measurable
* `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace`: the σ-algebra associated with a stopping time
## Main results
* `ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess`: the stopped process of a progressively measurable process is
progressively measurable.
* `memLp_stoppedProcess`: if a process belongs to `ℒp` at every time in `ℕ`, then its stopped
process belongs to `ℒp` as well.
## Tags
stopping time, stochastic process
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω}
/-! ### Stopping times -/
/-- A stopping time with respect to some filtration `f` is a function
`τ` such that for all `i`, the preimage of `{j | j ≤ i}` along `τ` is measurable
with respect to `f i`.
Intuitively, the stopping time `τ` describes some stopping rule such that at time
`i`, we may determine it with the information we have at time `i`. -/
def IsStoppingTime [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (τ : Ω → ι) :=
∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] <| {ω | τ ω ≤ i}
theorem isStoppingTime_const [Preorder ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
IsStoppingTime f fun _ => i := fun j => by simp only [MeasurableSet.const]
section MeasurableSet
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
protected theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} :=
hτ i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_pred [PredOrder ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
rw [isMin_iff_forall_not_lt] at hi_min
exact hi_min (τ ω)
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iic (pred i) := by ext; simp [Iic_pred_of_not_isMin hi_min]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (pred_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le <| pred i)
end Preorder
section CountableStoppingTime
namespace IsStoppingTime
variable [PartialOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ ⋃ (j ∈ Set.range τ) (_ : j < i), {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 a
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq',
Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_le]
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [h, lt_iff_le_not_le, le_refl, and_imp, imp_self, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· exact h.1.eq_or_lt.resolve_right fun h_lt => h.2 a h_lt le_rfl
rw [this]
refine (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff ?_
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun j _ => ?_
classical
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_if]
split_ifs with hji
· exact f.mono hji.le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
· exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by ext1 ω; simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι}
{f : Filtration ι m} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range h_countable i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable {ι} [LinearOrder ι] {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
[Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range (Set.to_countable _) i
end IsStoppingTime
end CountableStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_gt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i < τ ω} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_le]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).compl
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt`. -/
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι)
(h_lub : IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i) : MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
by_cases hi_min : IsMin i
· suffices {ω | τ ω < i} = ∅ by rw [this]; exact @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false]
exact isMin_iff_forall_not_lt.mp hi_min (τ ω)
obtain ⟨seq, -, -, h_tendsto, h_bound⟩ :
∃ seq : ℕ → ι, Monotone seq ∧ (∀ j, seq j ≤ i) ∧ Tendsto seq atTop (𝓝 i) ∧ ∀ j, seq j < i :=
h_lub.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto (not_isMin_iff.mp hi_min)
have h_Ioi_eq_Union : Set.Iio i = ⋃ j, {k | k ≤ seq j} := by
ext1 k
simp only [Set.mem_Iio, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun hk_lt_i => ?_, fun h_exists_k_le_seq => ?_⟩
· rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h_tendsto
have h_nhds : Set.Ici k ∈ 𝓝 i :=
mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨Set.Ioi k, Set.Ioi_subset_Ici le_rfl, isOpen_Ioi, hk_lt_i⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, b ≥ a → k ≤ seq b := h_tendsto (Set.Ici k) h_nhds
exact ⟨a, ha a le_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨j, hk_seq_j⟩ := h_exists_k_le_seq
exact hk_seq_j.trans_lt (h_bound j)
have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iio]
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Ioi_eq_Union]
simp only [Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.preimage_setOf_eq]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => f.mono (h_bound n).le _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (seq n))
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'_lub⟩ : ∃ i', IsLUB (Set.Iio i) i' := exists_lub_Iio i
rcases lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic i hi'_lub with hi'_eq_i | h_Iio_eq_Iic
· rw [← hi'_eq_i] at hi'_lub ⊢
exact hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_isLUB i' hi'_lub
· have h_lt_eq_preimage : {ω : Ω | τ ω < i} = τ ⁻¹' Set.Iio i := rfl
rw [h_lt_eq_preimage, h_Iio_eq_Iic]
exact f.mono (lub_Iio_le i hi'_lub) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le i')
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_ge (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω < i}ᶜ := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_compl_iff, not_lt]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_lt i).compl
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω = i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≥ i} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_inter_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le i).inter (hτ.measurableSet_ge i)
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_eq_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_eq i
theorem IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_lt_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i j : ι} (hle : i ≤ j) :
MeasurableSet[f j] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
f.mono hle _ <| hτ.measurableSet_lt i
end TopologicalSpace
end LinearOrder
section Countable
theorem isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq [Preorder ι] [Countable ι] {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] {ω | τ ω = i}) : IsStoppingTime f τ := by
intro i
rw [show {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | τ ω = k} by ext; simp]
refine MeasurableSet.biUnion (Set.to_countable _) fun k hk => ?_
exact f.mono hk _ (hτ k)
end Countable
end MeasurableSet
namespace IsStoppingTime
protected theorem max [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [max_le_iff, Set.setOf_and]
exact (hτ i).inter (hπ i)
protected theorem max_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => max (τ ω) i :=
hτ.max (isStoppingTime_const f i)
protected theorem min [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) (π ω) := by
intro i
simp_rw [min_le_iff, Set.setOf_or]
exact (hτ i).union (hπ i)
protected theorem min_const [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι}
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => min (τ ω) i :=
hτ.min (isStoppingTime_const f i)
theorem add_const [AddGroup ι] [Preorder ι] [AddRightMono ι]
[AddLeftMono ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{i : ι} (hi : 0 ≤ i) : IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
intro j
simp_rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact f.mono (sub_le_self j hi) _ (hτ (j - i))
theorem add_const_nat {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ℕ} :
IsStoppingTime f fun ω => τ ω + i := by
refine isStoppingTime_of_measurableSet_eq fun j => ?_
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp_rw [eq_comm, ← Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hij, eq_comm]
exact f.mono (j.sub_le i) _ (hτ.measurableSet_eq (j - i))
· rw [not_le] at hij
convert @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)
ext ω
simp only [Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, Set.mem_setOf]
omega
-- generalize to certain countable type?
theorem add {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ π : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
IsStoppingTime f (τ + π) := by
intro i
rw [(_ : {ω | (τ + π) ω ≤ i} = ⋃ k ≤ i, {ω | π ω = k} ∩ {ω | τ ω + k ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun hk => (hπ.measurableSet_eq_le hk).inter (hτ.add_const_nat i)
ext ω
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨π ω, by omega, rfl, h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, rfl, h⟩
assumption
section Preorder
variable [Preorder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
/-- The associated σ-algebra with a stopping time. -/
protected def measurableSpace (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : MeasurableSpace Ω where
MeasurableSet' s := ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})
measurableSet_empty i := (Set.empty_inter {ω | τ ω ≤ i}).symm ▸ @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f i)
measurableSet_compl s hs i := by
rw [(_ : sᶜ ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} = (sᶜ ∪ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ) ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· rw [← Set.compl_inter]
exact (hs i).compl
· exact hτ i
· rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
simp only [Set.compl_inter_self, Set.union_empty]
measurableSet_iUnion s hs i := by
rw [forall_swap] at hs
rw [Set.iUnion_inter]
exact MeasurableSet.iUnion (hs i)
protected theorem measurableSet (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ↔ ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem measurableSpace_mono (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (hle : τ ≤ π) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ hπ.measurableSpace := by
intro s hs i
rw [(_ : s ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ i})]
· exact (hs i).inter (hπ i)
· ext
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and, and_congr_left_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
intro hle' _
exact le_trans (hle _) hle'
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, hx, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
theorem measurableSpace_le [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· haveI : IsEmpty Ω := ⟨fun ω => IsEmpty.false (τ ω)⟩
apply Subsingleton.measurableSet
· change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
obtain ⟨seq : ℕ → ι, h_seq_tendsto⟩ := (atTop : Filter ι).exists_seq_tendsto
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ seq n})]
· exact MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => f.le (seq i) _ (hs (seq i))
· ext ω; constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· intro hx
suffices ∃ i, τ ω ≤ seq i from ⟨this.choose, hx, this.choose_spec⟩
rw [tendsto_atTop] at h_seq_tendsto
exact (h_seq_tendsto (τ ω)).exists
· rintro ⟨_, hx, _⟩
exact hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias measurableSpace_le' := measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℕ m} {τ : Ω → ℕ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
example {f : Filtration ℝ m} {τ : Ω → ℝ} (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
hτ.measurableSpace_le
@[simp]
theorem measurableSpace_const (f : Filtration ι m) (i : ι) :
(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace = f i := by
ext1 s
change MeasurableSet[(isStoppingTime_const f i).measurableSpace] s ↔ MeasurableSet[f i] s
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_false, Set.inter_empty, @MeasurableSet.empty _ (f.1 j)]
theorem measurableSet_inter_eq_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω = i}) := by
have : ∀ j, {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω = i} ∩ {_ω | i ≤ j} := by
intro j
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hxi
rw [hxi]
constructor <;> intro h
· specialize h i
simpa only [Set.inter_assoc, this, le_refl, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ] using h
· intro j
rw [Set.inter_assoc, this]
by_cases hij : i ≤ j
· simp only [hij, Set.setOf_true, Set.inter_univ]
exact f.mono hij _ h
· simp [hij]
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ f i :=
(measurableSpace_mono hτ _ hτ_le).trans (measurableSpace_const _ _).le
theorem measurableSpace_le_of_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) :
hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m :=
(hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le_const hτ_le).trans (f.le n)
theorem le_measurableSpace_of_const_le (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, i ≤ τ ω) :
f i ≤ hτ.measurableSpace :=
(measurableSpace_const _ _).symm.le.trans (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ hτ_le)
end Preorder
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι]
[(Filter.atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {μ : Measure Ω} {f : Filtration ι m}
{τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
SigmaFinite (μ.trim hτ.measurableSpace_le) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
instance sigmaFinite_stopping_time_of_le {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] [OrderBot ι] {μ : Measure Ω}
{f : Filtration ι m} {τ : Ω → ι} [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ f] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {n : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hτ.measurableSpace_le_of_le hτ_le)) := by
refine @sigmaFiniteTrim_mono _ _ ?_ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact f ⊥
· exact hτ.le_measurableSpace_of_const_le fun _ => bot_le
· infer_instance
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder ι] {f : Filtration ι m} {τ π : Ω → ι}
protected theorem measurableSet_le' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ i} := by
intro j
have : {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω; simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff]
rw [this]
exact f.mono (min_le_right i j) _ (hτ _)
protected theorem measurableSet_gt' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i < τ ω} := by
have : {ω : Ω | i < τ ω} = {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i}ᶜ := by ext1 ω; simp
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).compl
protected theorem measurableSet_eq' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt' [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[FirstCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq' i)
section Countable
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} := by
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω | τ ω = i}, measurableSet_inter_eq_iff, Set.univ_inter]
exact hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range h_countable i
protected theorem measurableSet_eq_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} := by
have : {ω | i ≤ τ ω} = {ω | τ ω = i} ∪ {ω | i < τ ω} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_union]
rw [@eq_comm _ i, or_comm]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i).union (hτ.measurableSet_gt' i)
protected theorem measurableSet_ge_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | i ≤ τ ω} :=
hτ.measurableSet_ge_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} := by
have : {ω | τ ω < i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} \ {ω | τ ω = i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff]
rw [this]
exact (hτ.measurableSet_le' i).diff (hτ.measurableSet_eq_of_countable_range' h_countable i)
protected theorem measurableSet_lt_of_countable' [Countable ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω < i} :=
hτ.measurableSet_lt_of_countable_range' (Set.to_countable _) i
protected theorem measurableSpace_le_of_countable_range (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(h_countable : (Set.range τ).Countable) : hτ.measurableSpace ≤ m := by
intro s hs
change ∀ i, MeasurableSet[f i] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) at hs
rw [(_ : s = ⋃ i ∈ Set.range τ, s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i})]
· exact MeasurableSet.biUnion h_countable fun i _ => f.le i _ (hs i)
· ext ω
constructor <;> rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
· exact fun hx => ⟨τ ω, by simpa using hx⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iUnion_exists, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff,
Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop, exists_and_right] at hx
exact hx.2.1
end Countable
protected theorem measurable [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] τ :=
@measurable_of_Iic ι Ω _ _ _ hτ.measurableSpace _ _ _ _ fun i => hτ.measurableSet_le' i
protected theorem measurable_of_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι}
(hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ i) : Measurable[f i] τ :=
hτ.measurable.mono (measurableSpace_le_of_le_const _ hτ_le) le_rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ hπ.measurableSpace := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· exact le_inf (measurableSpace_mono _ hτ fun _ => min_le_left _ _)
(measurableSpace_mono _ hπ fun _ => min_le_right _ _)
· intro s
change MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s →
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
have : ∀ i, {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} = {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∪ {ω | π ω ≤ i} := by
intro i; ext1 ω; simp
simp_rw [this, Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
exact fun h i => (h.left i).union (h.right i)
theorem measurableSet_min_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min hτ hπ]; rfl
theorem measurableSpace_min_const (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) {i : ι} :
(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace = hτ.measurableSpace ⊓ f i := by
rw [hτ.measurableSpace_min (isStoppingTime_const _ i), measurableSpace_const]
theorem measurableSet_min_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) {i : ι} :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] s ↔
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s ∧ MeasurableSet[f i] s := by
rw [measurableSpace_min_const hτ]; apply MeasurableSpace.measurableSet_inf
theorem measurableSet_inter_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι] [OrderTopology ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π)
(s : Set Ω) (hs : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] s) :
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
simp_rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet] at hs ⊢
intro i
have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} =
s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i} ∩ {ω | min (τ ω) (π ω) ≤ i} ∩
{ω | min (τ ω) i ≤ min (min (τ ω) (π ω)) i} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [min_le_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_min_iff, le_refl, true_and,
true_or]
by_cases hτi : τ ω ≤ i
· simp only [hτi, true_or, and_true, and_congr_right_iff]
intro
constructor <;> intro h
· exact Or.inl h
· rcases h with h | h
· exact h
· exact hτi.trans h
simp only [hτi, false_or, and_false, false_and, iff_false, not_and, not_le, and_imp]
refine fun _ hτ_le_π => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hτ_le_π
rw [← not_le]
exact hτi
rw [this]
refine ((hs i).inter ((hτ.min hπ) i)).inter ?_
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f i) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact ((hτ.min hπ).min_const i).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_iff [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) (s : Set Ω) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}) := by
constructor <;> intro h
· have : s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} = s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self]
rw [this]
exact measurableSet_inter_le _ hπ _ h
· rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at h
exact h.1
theorem measurableSet_inter_le_const_iff (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (s : Set Ω) (i : ι) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) ↔
MeasurableSet[(hτ.min_const i).measurableSpace] (s ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ i}) := by
rw [IsStoppingTime.measurableSet_min_iff hτ (isStoppingTime_const _ i),
IsStoppingTime.measurableSpace_const, IsStoppingTime.measurableSet]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h, ?_⟩, fun h j => h.1 j⟩
specialize h i
rwa [Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_self] at h
theorem measurableSet_le_stopping_time [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} = {ω | min (τ ω) j ≤ min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, min_le_iff, le_min_iff, le_refl,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
simp only [h, or_self_iff, and_true]
rw [Iff.comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact h.trans
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)
apply @measurableSet_le _ _ _ _ _ (Filtration.seq f j) _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_stopping_time_le [TopologicalSpace ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
(hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) : MeasurableSet[hπ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} := by
suffices MeasurableSet[(hτ.min hπ).measurableSpace] {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω} by
rw [measurableSet_min_iff hτ hπ] at this; exact this.2
rw [← Set.univ_inter {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ π ω}, ← hτ.measurableSet_inter_le_iff hπ, Set.univ_inter]
exact measurableSet_le_stopping_time hτ hπ
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time [AddGroup ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [MeasurableSpace ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[MeasurableSub₂ ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hσ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hσ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
theorem measurableSet_eq_stopping_time_of_countable [Countable ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[MeasurableSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [MeasurableSingletonClass ι]
[SecondCountableTopology ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (hπ : IsStoppingTime f π) :
MeasurableSet[hτ.measurableSpace] {ω | τ ω = π ω} := by
rw [hτ.measurableSet]
intro j
have : {ω | τ ω = π ω} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} =
{ω | min (τ ω) j = min (π ω) j} ∩ {ω | τ ω ≤ j} ∩ {ω | π ω ≤ j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨?_, h.2⟩, ?_⟩, fun h => ⟨?_, h.1.2⟩⟩
· rw [h.1]
· rw [← h.1]; exact h.2
· obtain ⟨h', hπ_le⟩ := h
obtain ⟨h_eq, hτ_le⟩ := h'
rwa [min_eq_left hτ_le, min_eq_left hπ_le] at h_eq
rw [this]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter (MeasurableSet.inter ?_ (hτ.measurableSet_le j)) (hπ.measurableSet_le j)
apply measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable
· exact (hτ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
· exact (hπ.min_const j).measurable_of_le fun _ => min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end IsStoppingTime
section LinearOrder
/-! ## Stopped value and stopped process -/
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, its stopped value with respect to the stopping
time `τ` is the map `x ↦ u (τ ω) ω`. -/
def stoppedValue (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : Ω → β := fun ω => u (τ ω) ω
theorem stoppedValue_const (u : ι → Ω → β) (i : ι) : (stoppedValue u fun _ => i) = u i :=
rfl
variable [LinearOrder ι]
/-- Given a map `u : ι → Ω → E`, the stopped process with respect to `τ` is `u i ω` if
`i ≤ τ ω`, and `u (τ ω) ω` otherwise.
Intuitively, the stopped process stops evolving once the stopping time has occurred. -/
def stoppedProcess (u : ι → Ω → β) (τ : Ω → ι) : ι → Ω → β := fun i ω => u (min i (τ ω)) ω
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_stoppedValue {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedProcess u τ = fun i => stoppedValue u fun ω => min i (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedProcess {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ σ : Ω → ι} :
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess u τ) σ = stoppedValue u fun ω => min (σ ω) (τ ω) :=
rfl
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_le {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : i ≤ τ ω) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u i ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_left h]
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {i : ι} {ω : Ω} (h : τ ω ≤ i) :
stoppedProcess u τ i ω = u (τ ω) ω := by simp [stoppedProcess, min_eq_right h]
section ProgMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace ι] [OrderTopology ι] [SecondCountableTopology ι]
[BorelSpace ι] [TopologicalSpace β] {u : ι → Ω → β} {τ : Ω → ι} {f : Filtration ι m}
theorem progMeasurable_min_stopping_time [MetrizableSpace ι] (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => min i (τ ω) := by
intro i
let m_prod : MeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) := Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)
let m_set : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω), MeasurableSpace t := fun _ =>
@Subtype.instMeasurableSpace (Set.Iic i × Ω) _ m_prod
let s := {p : Set.Iic i × Ω | τ p.2 ≤ i}
have hs : MeasurableSet[m_prod] s := @measurable_snd (Set.Iic i) Ω _ (f i) _ (hτ i)
have h_meas_fst : ∀ t : Set (Set.Iic i × Ω),
Measurable[m_set t] fun x : t => ((x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst : ι) :=
fun t => (@measurable_subtype_coe (Set.Iic i × Ω) m_prod _).fst.subtype_val
apply Measurable.stronglyMeasurable
refine measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs ?_ ?_
· refine @Measurable.min _ _ _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ _ (h_meas_fst s) ?_
refine @measurable_of_Iic ι s _ _ _ (m_set s) _ _ _ _ fun j => ?_
have h_set_eq : (fun x : s => τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' Set.Iic j =
(fun x : s => (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd) ⁻¹' {ω | τ ω ≤ min i j} := by
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Iic, iff_and_self, le_min_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun _ => ω.prop
rw [h_set_eq]
suffices h_meas : @Measurable _ _ (m_set s) (f i) fun x : s ↦ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd from
h_meas (f.mono (min_le_left _ _) _ (hτ.measurableSet_le (min i j)))
exact measurable_snd.comp (@measurable_subtype_coe _ m_prod _)
· letI sc := sᶜ
suffices h_min_eq_left :
(fun x : sc => min (↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst) (τ (x : Set.Iic i × Ω).snd)) = fun x : sc =>
↑(x : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [sc, Set.restrict, h_min_eq_left]
exact h_meas_fst _
ext1 ω
rw [min_eq_left]
have hx_fst_le : ↑(ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst ≤ i := (ω : Set.Iic i × Ω).fst.prop
refine hx_fst_le.trans (le_of_lt ?_)
convert ω.prop
simp only [sc, s, not_le, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem ProgMeasurable.stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : ProgMeasurable f (stoppedProcess u τ) :=
h.comp (progMeasurable_min_stopping_time hτ) fun _ _ => min_le_left _ _
theorem ProgMeasurable.adapted_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι] (h : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) : Adapted f (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ) :=
(h.stoppedProcess hτ).adapted
theorem ProgMeasurable.stronglyMeasurable_stoppedProcess [MetrizableSpace ι]
(hu : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable (MeasureTheory.stoppedProcess u τ i) :=
(hu.adapted_stoppedProcess hτ i).mono (f.le _)
theorem stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le (h : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ)
{n : ι} (hτ_le : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ n) : StronglyMeasurable[f n] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have : stoppedValue u τ =
(fun p : Set.Iic n × Ω => u (↑p.fst) p.snd) ∘ fun ω => (⟨τ ω, hτ_le ω⟩, ω) := by
ext1 ω; simp only [stoppedValue, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
rw [this]
refine StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable (h n) ?_
exact (hτ.measurable_of_le hτ_le).subtype_mk.prodMk measurable_id
theorem measurable_stoppedValue [MetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
(hf_prog : ProgMeasurable f u) (hτ : IsStoppingTime f τ) :
Measurable[hτ.measurableSpace] (stoppedValue u τ) := by
have h_str_meas : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[f i] (stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) := fun i =>
stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf_prog (hτ.min_const i) fun _ => min_le_right _ _
intro t ht i
suffices stoppedValue u τ ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} =
(stoppedValue u fun ω => min (τ ω) i) ⁻¹' t ∩ {ω : Ω | τ ω ≤ i} by
rw [this]; exact ((h_str_meas i).measurable ht).inter (hτ.measurableSet_le i)
ext1 ω
simp only [stoppedValue, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
rw [min_eq_left h]
end ProgMeasurable
end LinearOrder
section StoppedValueOfMemFinset
|
variable {μ : Measure Ω} {τ : Ω → ι} {E : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {u : ι → Ω → E}
theorem stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ∈ s) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ s, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext y
classical
rw [stoppedValue, Finset.sum_apply, Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter]
suffices {i ∈ s | y ∈ {ω : Ω | τ ω = i}} = ({τ y} : Finset ι) by
rw [this, Finset.sum_singleton]
ext1 ω
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_singleton]
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h.2.symm
· refine ⟨?_, h.symm⟩; rw [h]; exact hbdd y
theorem stoppedValue_eq' [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {N : ι}
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω ≤ N) :
stoppedValue u τ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Iic N, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) :=
stoppedValue_eq_of_mem_finset fun ω => Finset.mem_Iic.mpr (hbdd ω)
theorem stoppedProcess_eq_of_mem_finset [LinearOrder ι] [AddCommMonoid E] {s : Finset ι} (n : ι)
(hbdd : ∀ ω, τ ω < n → τ ω ∈ s) : stoppedProcess u τ n = Set.indicator {a | n ≤ τ a} (u n) +
∑ i ∈ s with i < n, Set.indicator {ω | τ ω = i} (u i) := by
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_apply]
rcases le_or_lt n (τ ω) with h | h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_le h, Set.indicator_of_mem, Finset.sum_eq_zero, add_zero]
· intro m hm
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hm
exact (hm.2.trans_le h).ne'
· exact h
· rw [stoppedProcess_eq_of_ge (le_of_lt h), Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (τ ω)]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, zero_add, Set.indicator_of_mem] <;> rw [Set.mem_setOf]
exact not_le.2 h
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Stopping.lean | 801 | 836 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Dart
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Fintype
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Set
/-!
# Maps between graphs
This file defines two functions and three structures relating graphs.
The structures directly correspond to the classification of functions as
injective, surjective and bijective, and have corresponding notation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.map`: the graph obtained by pushing the adjacency relation through
an injective function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.comap`: the graph obtained by pulling the adjacency relation behind
an arbitrary function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.induce`: the subgraph induced by the given vertex set, a wrapper around `comap`.
* `SimpleGraph.spanningCoe`: the supergraph without any additional edges, a wrapper around `map`.
* `SimpleGraph.Hom`, `G →g H`: a graph homomorphism from `G` to `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Embedding`, `G ↪g H`: a graph embedding of `G` in `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Iso`, `G ≃g H`: a graph isomorphism between `G` and `H`.
Note that a graph embedding is a stronger notion than an injective graph homomorphism,
since its image is an induced subgraph.
## Implementation notes
Morphisms of graphs are abbreviations for `RelHom`, `RelEmbedding` and `RelIso`.
To make use of pre-existing simp lemmas, definitions involving morphisms are
abbreviations as well.
-/
open Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V W X : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) {u v : V}
/-! ## Map and comap -/
/-- Given an injective function, there is a covariant induced map on graphs by pushing forward
the adjacency relation.
This is injective (see `SimpleGraph.map_injective`). -/
protected def map (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : SimpleGraph W where
Adj := Relation.Map G.Adj f f
symm a b := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, rfl⟩
use w, v, h.symm, rfl
loopless a := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, h'⟩
exact h.ne (f.injective h'.symm)
instance instDecidableMapAdj {f : V ↪ W} {a b} [Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)] :
Decidable ((G.map f).Adj a b) := ‹Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)›
@[simp]
theorem map_adj (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (u v : W) :
(G.map f).Adj u v ↔ ∃ u' v' : V, G.Adj u' v' ∧ f u' = u ∧ f v' = v :=
Iff.rfl
lemma map_adj_apply {G : SimpleGraph V} {f : V ↪ W} {a b : V} :
(G.map f).Adj (f a) (f b) ↔ G.Adj a b := by simp
theorem map_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.map f) := by
rintro G G' h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, h ha, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id : G.map (Function.Embedding.refl _) = G :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_id_id _
@[simp] lemma map_map (f : V ↪ W) (g : W ↪ X) : (G.map f).map g = G.map (f.trans g) :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_map _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given a function, there is a contravariant induced map on graphs by pulling back the
adjacency relation.
This is one of the ways of creating induced graphs. See `SimpleGraph.induce` for a wrapper.
This is surjective when `f` is injective (see `SimpleGraph.comap_surjective`). -/
protected def comap (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj u v := G.Adj (f u) (f v)
symm _ _ h := h.symm
loopless _ := G.loopless _
@[simp] lemma comap_adj {G : SimpleGraph W} {f : V → W} :
(G.comap f).Adj u v ↔ G.Adj (f u) (f v) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id {G : SimpleGraph V} : G.comap id = G := SimpleGraph.ext rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_comap {G : SimpleGraph X} (f : V → W) (g : W → X) :
(G.comap g).comap f = G.comap (g ∘ f) := rfl
instance instDecidableComapAdj (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidableRel (G.comap f).Adj := fun _ _ ↦ ‹DecidableRel G.Adj› _ _
lemma comap_symm (G : SimpleGraph V) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.comap e.symm.toEmbedding = G.map e.toEmbedding := by
ext; simp only [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, comap_adj, map_adj, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply,
exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right]
lemma map_symm (G : SimpleGraph W) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.map e.symm.toEmbedding = G.comap e.toEmbedding := by rw [← comap_symm, e.symm_symm]
theorem comap_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.comap f) := by
intro G G' h _ _ ha
exact h ha
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_eq (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : (G.map f).comap f = G := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_comap_map (f : V ↪ W) :
Function.LeftInverse (SimpleGraph.comap f) (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
comap_map_eq f
theorem map_injective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Injective (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
(leftInverse_comap_map f).injective
theorem comap_surjective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Surjective (SimpleGraph.comap f) :=
(leftInverse_comap_map f).surjective
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) :
G.map f ≤ G' ↔ G ≤ G'.comap f :=
⟨fun h _ _ ha => h ⟨_, _, ha, rfl, rfl⟩, by
rintro h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact h ha⟩
theorem map_comap_le (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : (G.comap f).map f ≤ G := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma le_comap_of_subsingleton (f : V → W) [Subsingleton V] : G ≤ G'.comap f := by
intros v w; simp [Subsingleton.elim v w]
lemma map_le_of_subsingleton (f : V ↪ W) [Subsingleton V] : G.map f ≤ G' := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]; apply le_comap_of_subsingleton
/-- Given a family of vertex types indexed by `ι`, pulling back from `⊤ : SimpleGraph ι`
yields the complete multipartite graph on the family.
Two vertices are adjacent if and only if their indices are not equal. -/
abbrev completeMultipartiteGraph {ι : Type*} (V : ι → Type*) : SimpleGraph (Σ i, V i) :=
SimpleGraph.comap Sigma.fst ⊤
/-- Equivalent types have equivalent simple graphs. -/
@[simps apply]
protected def _root_.Equiv.simpleGraph (e : V ≃ W) : SimpleGraph V ≃ SimpleGraph W where
toFun := SimpleGraph.comap e.symm
invFun := SimpleGraph.comap e
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.Equiv.simpleGraph_refl : (Equiv.refl V).simpleGraph = Equiv.refl _ := by
ext; rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.Equiv.simpleGraph_trans (e₁ : V ≃ W) (e₂ : W ≃ X) :
(e₁.trans e₂).simpleGraph = e₁.simpleGraph.trans e₂.simpleGraph := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.Equiv.symm_simpleGraph (e : V ≃ W) : e.simpleGraph.symm = e.symm.simpleGraph := rfl
/-! ## Induced graphs -/
/- Given a set `s` of vertices, we can restrict a graph to those vertices by restricting its
adjacency relation. This gives a map between `SimpleGraph V` and `SimpleGraph s`.
There is also a notion of induced subgraphs (see `SimpleGraph.subgraph.induce`). -/
/-- Restrict a graph to the vertices in the set `s`, deleting all edges incident to vertices
outside the set. This is a wrapper around `SimpleGraph.comap`. -/
abbrev induce (s : Set V) (G : SimpleGraph V) : SimpleGraph s :=
G.comap (Function.Embedding.subtype _)
@[simp] lemma induce_singleton_eq_top (v : V) : G.induce {v} = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]; apply le_comap_of_subsingleton
/-- Given a graph on a set of vertices, we can make it be a `SimpleGraph V` by
adding in the remaining vertices without adding in any additional edges.
This is a wrapper around `SimpleGraph.map`. -/
abbrev spanningCoe {s : Set V} (G : SimpleGraph s) : SimpleGraph V :=
G.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _)
theorem induce_spanningCoe {s : Set V} {G : SimpleGraph s} : G.spanningCoe.induce s = G :=
comap_map_eq _ _
theorem spanningCoe_induce_le (s : Set V) : (G.induce s).spanningCoe ≤ G :=
map_comap_le _ _
/-! ## Homomorphisms, embeddings and isomorphisms -/
/-- A graph homomorphism is a map on vertex sets that respects adjacency relations.
The notation `G →g G'` represents the type of graph homomorphisms. -/
abbrev Hom :=
RelHom G.Adj G'.Adj
/-- A graph embedding is an embedding `f` such that for vertices `v w : V`,
`G'.Adj (f v) (f w) ↔ G.Adj v w`. Its image is an induced subgraph of G'.
The notation `G ↪g G'` represents the type of graph embeddings. -/
abbrev Embedding :=
RelEmbedding G.Adj G'.Adj
/-- A graph isomorphism is a bijective map on vertex sets that respects adjacency relations.
The notation `G ≃g G'` represents the type of graph isomorphisms.
-/
abbrev Iso :=
RelIso G.Adj G'.Adj
@[inherit_doc] infixl:50 " →g " => Hom
@[inherit_doc] infixl:50 " ↪g " => Embedding
@[inherit_doc] infixl:50 " ≃g " => Iso
namespace Hom
variable {G G'} {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} {H : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G')
/-- The identity homomorphism from a graph to itself. -/
protected abbrev id : G →g G :=
RelHom.id _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id : ⇑(Hom.id : G →g G) = id := rfl
instance [Subsingleton (V → W)] : Subsingleton (G →g H) := DFunLike.coe_injective.subsingleton
instance [IsEmpty V] : Unique (G →g H) where
default := ⟨isEmptyElim, fun {a} ↦ isEmptyElim a⟩
uniq _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
instance [Finite V] [Finite W] : Finite (G →g H) := DFunLike.finite _
theorem map_adj {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) : G'.Adj (f v) (f w) :=
f.map_rel' h
theorem map_mem_edgeSet {e : Sym2 V} (h : e ∈ G.edgeSet) : e.map f ∈ G'.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ => f.map_rel') e h
theorem apply_mem_neighborSet {v w : V} (h : w ∈ G.neighborSet v) : f w ∈ G'.neighborSet (f v) :=
map_adj f h
/-- The map between edge sets induced by a homomorphism.
The underlying map on edges is given by `Sym2.map`. -/
@[simps]
def mapEdgeSet (e : G.edgeSet) : G'.edgeSet :=
⟨Sym2.map f e, f.map_mem_edgeSet e.property⟩
/-- The map between neighbor sets induced by a homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapNeighborSet (v : V) (w : G.neighborSet v) : G'.neighborSet (f v) :=
⟨f w, f.apply_mem_neighborSet w.property⟩
/-- The map between darts induced by a homomorphism. -/
def mapDart (d : G.Dart) : G'.Dart :=
⟨d.1.map f f, f.map_adj d.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapDart_apply (d : G.Dart) : f.mapDart d = ⟨d.1.map f f, f.map_adj d.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The graph homomorphism from a smaller graph to a bigger one. -/
def ofLE (h : G₁ ≤ G₂) : G₁ →g G₂ := ⟨id, @h⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_ofLE (h : G₁ ≤ G₂) : ⇑(ofLE h) = id := rfl
lemma ofLE_apply (h : G₁ ≤ G₂) (v : V) : ofLE h v = v := rfl
/-- The induced map for spanning subgraphs, which is the identity on vertices. -/
@[deprecated ofLE (since := "2025-03-17")]
def mapSpanningSubgraphs {G G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') : G →g G' where
toFun x := x
map_rel' ha := h ha
@[deprecated "This is true by simp" (since := "2025-03-17")]
lemma mapSpanningSubgraphs_inj {G G' : SimpleGraph V} {v w : V} (h : G ≤ G') :
ofLE h v = ofLE h w ↔ v = w := by simp
@[deprecated "This is true by simp" (since := "2025-03-17")]
lemma mapSpanningSubgraphs_injective {G G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') :
Injective (ofLE h) :=
fun v w hvw ↦ by simpa using hvw
theorem mapEdgeSet.injective (hinj : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective f.mapEdgeSet := by
rintro ⟨e₁, h₁⟩ ⟨e₂, h₂⟩
dsimp [Hom.mapEdgeSet]
repeat rw [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
apply Sym2.map.injective hinj
/-- Every graph homomorphism from a complete graph is injective. -/
theorem injective_of_top_hom (f : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V) →g G') : Function.Injective f := by
intro v w h
contrapose! h
exact G'.ne_of_adj (map_adj _ ((top_adj _ _).mpr h))
/-- There is a homomorphism to a graph from a comapped graph.
When the function is injective, this is an embedding (see `SimpleGraph.Embedding.comap`). -/
@[simps]
protected def comap (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : G.comap f →g G where
toFun := f
map_rel' := by simp
variable {G'' : SimpleGraph X}
/-- Composition of graph homomorphisms. -/
abbrev comp (f' : G' →g G'') (f : G →g G') : G →g G'' :=
RelHom.comp f' f
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f' : G' →g G'') (f : G →g G') : ⇑(f'.comp f) = f' ∘ f :=
rfl
end Hom
namespace Embedding
variable {G G'} {H : SimpleGraph W} (f : G ↪g G')
/-- The identity embedding from a graph to itself. -/
abbrev refl : G ↪g G :=
RelEmbedding.refl _
/-- An embedding of graphs gives rise to a homomorphism of graphs. -/
abbrev toHom : G →g G' :=
f.toRelHom
@[simp] lemma coe_toHom (f : G ↪g H) : ⇑f.toHom = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_adj_iff {v w : V} : G'.Adj (f v) (f w) ↔ G.Adj v w :=
f.map_rel_iff
theorem map_mem_edgeSet_iff {e : Sym2 V} : e.map f ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ => f.map_adj_iff) e
theorem apply_mem_neighborSet_iff {v w : V} : f w ∈ G'.neighborSet (f v) ↔ w ∈ G.neighborSet v :=
map_adj_iff f
/-- A graph embedding induces an embedding of edge sets. -/
@[simps]
def mapEdgeSet : G.edgeSet ↪ G'.edgeSet where
toFun := Hom.mapEdgeSet f
inj' := Hom.mapEdgeSet.injective f.toRelHom f.injective
/-- A graph embedding induces an embedding of neighbor sets. -/
@[simps]
def mapNeighborSet (v : V) : G.neighborSet v ↪ G'.neighborSet (f v) where
toFun w := ⟨f w, f.apply_mem_neighborSet_iff.mpr w.2⟩
inj' := by
rintro ⟨w₁, h₁⟩ ⟨w₂, h₂⟩ h
rw [Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at h ⊢
exact f.inj' h
/-- Given an injective function, there is an embedding from the comapped graph into the original
graph. -/
-- Porting note: @[simps] does not work here since `f` is not a constructor application.
-- `@[simps toEmbedding]` could work, but Floris suggested writing `comap_apply` for now.
protected def comap (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : G.comap f ↪g G :=
{ f with map_rel_iff' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem comap_apply (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph W) (v : V) :
SimpleGraph.Embedding.comap f G v = f v := rfl
/-- Given an injective function, there is an embedding from a graph into the mapped graph. -/
-- Porting note: @[simps] does not work here since `f` is not a constructor application.
-- `@[simps toEmbedding]` could work, but Floris suggested writing `map_apply` for now.
protected def map (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : G ↪g G.map f :=
{ f with map_rel_iff' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) :
SimpleGraph.Embedding.map f G v = f v := rfl
/-- Induced graphs embed in the original graph.
Note that if `G.induce s = ⊤` (i.e., if `s` is a clique) then this gives the embedding of a
complete graph. -/
protected abbrev induce (s : Set V) : G.induce s ↪g G :=
SimpleGraph.Embedding.comap (Function.Embedding.subtype _) G
/-- Graphs on a set of vertices embed in their `spanningCoe`. -/
protected abbrev spanningCoe {s : Set V} (G : SimpleGraph s) : G ↪g G.spanningCoe :=
SimpleGraph.Embedding.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _) G
/-- Embeddings of types induce embeddings of complete graphs on those types. -/
protected def completeGraph {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph α) ↪g (⊤ : SimpleGraph β) :=
{ f with map_rel_iff' := by simp }
@[simp] lemma coe_completeGraph {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : ⇑(Embedding.completeGraph f) = f := rfl
variable {G'' : SimpleGraph X}
/-- Composition of graph embeddings. -/
abbrev comp (f' : G' ↪g G'') (f : G ↪g G') : G ↪g G'' :=
f.trans f'
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f' : G' ↪g G'') (f : G ↪g G') : ⇑(f'.comp f) = f' ∘ f :=
rfl
/-- Graph embeddings from `G` to `H` are the same thing as graph embeddings from `Gᶜ` to `Hᶜ`. -/
def complEquiv : G ↪g H ≃ Gᶜ ↪g Hᶜ where
toFun f := ⟨f.toEmbedding, by simp⟩
invFun f := ⟨f.toEmbedding, fun {v w} ↦ by
obtain rfl | hvw := eq_or_ne v w
· simp
· simpa [hvw, not_iff_not] using f.map_adj_iff (v := v) (w := w)⟩
left_inv f := rfl
right_inv f := rfl
end Embedding
section induceHom
variable {G G'} {G'' : SimpleGraph X} {s : Set V} {t : Set W} {r : Set X}
(φ : G →g G') (φst : Set.MapsTo φ s t) (ψ : G' →g G'') (ψtr : Set.MapsTo ψ t r)
/-- The restriction of a morphism of graphs to induced subgraphs. -/
def induceHom : G.induce s →g G'.induce t where
toFun := Set.MapsTo.restrict φ s t φst
map_rel' := φ.map_rel'
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_induceHom : ⇑(induceHom φ φst) = Set.MapsTo.restrict φ s t φst :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma induceHom_id (G : SimpleGraph V) (s) :
induceHom (Hom.id : G →g G) (Set.mapsTo_id s) = Hom.id := by
ext x
rfl
@[simp] lemma induceHom_comp :
(induceHom ψ ψtr).comp (induceHom φ φst) = induceHom (ψ.comp φ) (ψtr.comp φst) := by
ext x
rfl
lemma induceHom_injective (hi : Set.InjOn φ s) :
Function.Injective (induceHom φ φst) := by
simpa [Set.MapsTo.restrict_inj]
end induceHom
section induceHomLE
variable {s s' : Set V} (h : s ≤ s')
/-- Given an inclusion of vertex subsets, the induced embedding on induced graphs.
This is not an abbreviation for `induceHom` since we get an embedding in this case. -/
def induceHomOfLE (h : s ≤ s') : G.induce s ↪g G.induce s' where
toEmbedding := Set.embeddingOfSubset s s' h
map_rel_iff' := by simp
@[simp] lemma induceHomOfLE_apply (v : s) : (G.induceHomOfLE h) v = Set.inclusion h v := rfl
@[simp] lemma induceHomOfLE_toHom :
(G.induceHomOfLE h).toHom = induceHom (.id : G →g G) ((Set.mapsTo_id s).mono_right h) := by
ext; simp
end induceHomLE
namespace Iso
variable {G G'} (f : G ≃g G')
/-- The identity isomorphism of a graph with itself. -/
abbrev refl : G ≃g G :=
RelIso.refl _
/-- An isomorphism of graphs gives rise to an embedding of graphs. -/
abbrev toEmbedding : G ↪g G' :=
f.toRelEmbedding
/-- An isomorphism of graphs gives rise to a homomorphism of graphs. -/
abbrev toHom : G →g G' :=
f.toEmbedding.toHom
| /-- The inverse of a graph isomorphism. -/
abbrev symm : G' ≃g G :=
RelIso.symm f
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Maps.lean | 483 | 486 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.LocallyUniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
/-!
# Extended metric spaces
Further results about extended metric spaces.
-/
open Set Filter
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
open scoped Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.Ico` version. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `Finset.range` version. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `edist_le_Ico_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `edist_le_range_sum_edist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
namespace EMetric
theorem isUniformInducing_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformInducing f ↔ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
isUniformInducing_iff'.trans <| Iff.rfl.and <|
((uniformity_basis_edist.comap _).le_basis_iff uniformity_basis_edist).trans <| by
simp only [subset_def, Prod.forall]; rfl
/-- ε-δ characterization of uniform embeddings on pseudoemetric spaces -/
nonrec theorem isUniformEmbedding_iff [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔ Function.Injective f ∧ UniformContinuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
(isUniformEmbedding_iff _).trans <| and_comm.trans <| Iff.rfl.and isUniformInducing_iff
/-- If a map between pseudoemetric spaces is a uniform embedding then the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y`.
In fact, this lemma holds for a `IsUniformInducing` map.
TODO: generalize? -/
theorem controlled_of_isUniformEmbedding [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : IsUniformEmbedding f) :
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_iff.1 h.uniformContinuous, (isUniformEmbedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩
/-- ε-δ characterization of Cauchy sequences on pseudoemetric spaces -/
protected theorem cauchy_iff {f : Filter α} :
Cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x, x ∈ t → ∀ y, y ∈ t → edist x y < ε := by
rw [← neBot_iff]; exact uniformity_basis_edist.cauchy_iff
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `edist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∀ n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀ u : ℕ → α, (∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → edist (u n) (u m) < B N) →
∃ x, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x)) :
CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences
(fun n => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < B n }) (fun n => edist_mem_uniformity <| hB n) H
/-- A sequentially complete pseudoemetric space is complete. -/
theorem complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, CauchySeq u → ∃ a, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a)) → CompleteSpace α :=
UniformSpace.complete_of_cauchySeq_tendsto
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoLocallyUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
rcases H ε εpos x hx with ⟨t, ht, Ht⟩
exact ⟨t, ht, Ht.mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)⟩
/-- Expressing uniform convergence on a set using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set β} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x ∈ s, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
refine ⟨fun H ε hε => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity hε), fun H u hu => ?_⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_edist.1 hu with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact (H ε εpos).mono fun n hs x hx => hε (hs x hx)
/-- Expressing locally uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoLocallyUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α}
{p : Filter ι} :
TendstoLocallyUniformly F f p ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∀ x : β, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ y ∈ t, edist (f y) (F n y) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ,
forall_const, exists_prop, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Expressing uniform convergence using `edist`. -/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff {ι : Type*} {F : ι → β → α} {f : β → α} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x, edist (f x) (F n x) < ε := by
simp only [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, mem_univ, forall_const]
end EMetric
open EMetric
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
theorem inseparable_iff : Inseparable x y ↔ edist x y = 0 := by
simp [inseparable_iff_mem_closure, mem_closure_iff, edist_comm, forall_lt_iff_le']
alias ⟨_root_.Inseparable.edist_eq_zero, _⟩ := EMetric.inseparable_iff
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
/-- In a pseudoemetric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the pseudoedistance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff
/-- A variation around the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist.cauchySeq_iff'
/-- A variation of the emetric characterization of Cauchy sequences that deals with
`ℝ≥0` upper bounds. -/
theorem cauchySeq_iff_NNReal [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε : ℝ≥0, 0 < ε → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → edist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal.cauchySeq_iff'
theorem totallyBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Finite ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => H _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
theorem totallyBounded_iff' {s : Set α} :
TotallyBounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ y ∈ t, ball y ε :=
⟨fun H _ε ε0 => (totallyBounded_iff_subset.1 H) _ (edist_mem_uniformity ε0), fun H _r ru =>
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_edist.1 ru
let ⟨t, _, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0
⟨t, ft, h.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ _ => hε⟩⟩
section Compact
-- TODO: generalize to metrizable spaces
/-- A compact set in a pseudo emetric space is separable, i.e., it is a subset of the closure of a
countable set. -/
theorem subset_countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
refine subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set s fun ε hε => ?_
rcases totallyBounded_iff'.1 hs.totallyBounded ε hε with ⟨t, -, htf, hst⟩
exact ⟨t, htf.countable, hst.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => ball_subset_closedBall⟩
end Compact
section SecondCountable
open TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- A sigma compact pseudo emetric space has second countable topology. -/
instance (priority := 90) secondCountable_of_sigmaCompact [SigmaCompactSpace α] :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α by exact UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
choose T _ hTc hsubT using fun n =>
subset_countable_closure_of_compact (isCompact_compactCovering α n)
refine ⟨⟨⋃ n, T n, countable_iUnion hTc, fun x => ?_⟩⟩
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 (iUnion_compactCovering α) x with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ n) (hsubT _ hn)
theorem secondCountable_of_almost_dense_set
(hs : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε = univ) :
SecondCountableTopology α := by
suffices SeparableSpace α from UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, Set.Countable t ∧ univ ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := by
simpa only [univ_subset_iff] using hs
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set (univ : Set α) this with ⟨t, -, htc, ht⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, htc, fun x => ht (mem_univ x)⟩⟩
end SecondCountable
end EMetric
variable {γ : Type w} [EMetricSpace γ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- An emetric space is separated -/
instance (priority := 100) EMetricSpace.instT0Space : T0Space γ where
t0 _ _ h := eq_of_edist_eq_zero <| inseparable_iff.1 h
/-- A map between emetric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the edistance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem EMetric.isUniformEmbedding_iff' [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : γ → β} :
IsUniformEmbedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist a b < δ → edist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : γ}, edist (f a) (f b) < ε → edist a b < δ := by
rw [isUniformEmbedding_iff_isUniformInducing, isUniformInducing_iff, uniformContinuous_iff]
/-- If a `PseudoEMetricSpace` is a T₀ space, then it is an `EMetricSpace`. -/
-- TODO: make it an instance?
abbrev EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [T0Space α] :
EMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoEMetricSpace α› with
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := fun h => (EMetric.inseparable_iff.2 h).eq }
/-- The product of two emetric spaces, with the max distance, is an extended
metric spaces. We make sure that the uniform structure thus constructed is the one
corresponding to the product of uniform spaces, to avoid diamond problems. -/
instance Prod.emetricSpaceMax [EMetricSpace β] : EMetricSpace (γ × β) :=
.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace _
namespace EMetric
/-- A compact set in an emetric space is separable, i.e., it is the closure of a countable set. -/
theorem countable_closure_of_compact {s : Set γ} (hs : IsCompact s) :
∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s = closure t := by
rcases subset_countable_closure_of_compact hs with ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, htc, hsub.antisymm (closure_minimal hts hs.isClosed)⟩
end EMetric
/-!
### Separation quotient
-/
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EDist (SeparationQuotient X) where
edist := SeparationQuotient.lift₂ edist fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
edist_congr (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hx) (EMetric.inseparable_iff.1 hy)
@[simp] theorem SeparationQuotient.edist_mk [PseudoEMetricSpace X] (x y : X) :
edist (mk x) (mk y) = edist x y :=
rfl
open SeparationQuotient in
instance [PseudoEMetricSpace X] : EMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X) :=
@EMetricSpace.ofT0PseudoEMetricSpace (SeparationQuotient X)
{ edist_self := surjective_mk.forall.2 edist_self,
edist_comm := surjective_mk.forall₂.2 edist_comm,
edist_triangle := surjective_mk.forall₃.2 edist_triangle,
toUniformSpace := inferInstance,
uniformity_edist := comap_injective (surjective_mk.prodMap surjective_mk) <| by
simp [comap_mk_uniformity, PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist] } _
namespace TopologicalSpace
section Compact
open Topology
/-- If a set `s` is separable in a (pseudo extended) metric space, then it admits a countable dense
subset. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` given by the definition
of separability does not need in general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.exists_countable_dense_subset
{s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure t := by
have : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t : Set α, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x ε := fun ε ε0 => by
rcases hs with ⟨t, htc, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, htc, hst.trans fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε ε0 with ⟨y, hyt, hxy⟩
exact mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨y, hyt, mem_closedBall.2 hxy.le⟩
exact subset_countable_closure_of_almost_dense_set _ this
/-- If a set `s` is separable, then the corresponding subtype is separable in a (pseudo extended)
metric space. This is not obvious, as the countable set whose closure covers `s` does not need in
general to be contained in `s`. -/
theorem IsSeparable.separableSpace {s : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) :
SeparableSpace s := by
rcases hs.exists_countable_dense_subset with ⟨t, hts, htc, hst⟩
lift t to Set s using hts
refine ⟨⟨t, countable_of_injective_of_countable_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn htc, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, Subtype.forall]
end Compact
end TopologicalSpace
section LebesgueNumberLemma
variable {s : Set α}
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric {ι : Sort*} {c : ι → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhds {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhds hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin' {c : (x : α) → x ∈ s → Set α}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hc : ∀ x hx, c x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y : s, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y y.2 := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin' hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_nhdsWithin {c : α → Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, c x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y, ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ c y := by
simpa only [ball, UniformSpace.ball, preimage_setOf_eq, edist_comm]
using uniformity_basis_edist.lebesgue_number_lemma_nhdsWithin hs hc
theorem lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric_sUnion {c : Set (Set α)} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, IsOpen t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₂; simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_emetric hs (by simpa) hc₂
end LebesgueNumberLemma
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 902 | 903 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Lemmas
/-!
# Smooth bump functions on a smooth manifold
In this file we define `SmoothBumpFunction I c` to be a bundled smooth "bump" function centered at
`c`. It is a structure that consists of two real numbers `0 < rIn < rOut` with small enough `rOut`.
We define a coercion to function for this type, and for `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`, the function
`⇑f` written in the extended chart at `c` has the following properties:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The actual statements involve (pre)images under `extChartAt I f` and are given as lemmas in the
`SmoothBumpFunction` namespace.
## Tags
manifold, smooth bump function
-/
universe uE uF uH uM
variable {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M]
open Function Filter Module Set Metric
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
noncomputable section
/-!
### Smooth bump function
In this section we define a structure for a bundled smooth bump function and prove its properties.
-/
variable (I) in
/-- Given a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional space `E`,
`f : SmoothBumpFunction I M` is a smooth function on `M` such that in the extended chart `e` at
`f.c`:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `f.c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `f.c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The structure contains data required to construct a function with these properties. The function is
available as `⇑f` or `f x`. Formal statements of the properties listed above involve some
(pre)images under `extChartAt I f.c` and are given as lemmas in the `SmoothBumpFunction`
namespace. -/
structure SmoothBumpFunction (c : M) extends ContDiffBump (extChartAt I c c) where
closedBall_subset : closedBall (extChartAt I c c) rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target
namespace SmoothBumpFunction
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M}
/-- The function defined by `f : SmoothBumpFunction c`. Use automatic coercion to function
instead. -/
@[coe] def toFun : M → ℝ :=
indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c)
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpFunction I c) fun _ => M → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
theorem coe_def : ⇑f = indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) :=
rfl
end FiniteDimensional
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M}
theorem rOut_pos : 0 < f.rOut :=
f.toContDiffBump.rOut_pos
theorem ball_subset : ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target :=
Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall) f.closedBall_subset
theorem ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target :
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I =
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ (extChartAt I c).target :=
(subset_inter inter_subset_left f.ball_subset).antisymm <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <|
extChartAt_target_subset_range _
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
theorem eqOn_source : EqOn f (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) (chartAt H c).source :=
eqOn_indicator
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem_source (hx : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c :=
f.eqOn_source.eventuallyEq_of_mem <| (chartAt H c).open_source.mem_nhds hx
theorem one_of_dist_le (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) ≤ f.rIn) : f x = 1 := by
simp only [f.eqOn_source hs, (· ∘ ·), f.one_of_mem_closedBall hd]
theorem support_eq_inter_preimage :
support f = (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut := by
rw [coe_def, support_indicator, support_comp_eq_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', ← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq',
f.support_eq]
theorem isOpen_support : IsOpen (support f) := by
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage c isOpen_ball
theorem support_eq_symm_image :
support f = (extChartAt I c).symm '' (ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) := by
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', inter_comm,
ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target]
theorem support_subset_source : support f ⊆ (chartAt H c).source := by
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I]; exact inter_subset_left
theorem image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support {s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
extChartAt I c '' s =
closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ∩ (extChartAt I c).symm ⁻¹' s := by
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← extChartAt_source I, ← image_subset_iff] at hs
obtain ⟨hse, hsf⟩ := hs
apply Subset.antisymm
· refine subset_inter (subset_inter (hsf.trans ball_subset_closedBall) ?_) ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, -, rfl⟩; exact mem_range_self _
· rw [(extChartAt I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse]
exact inter_subset_right
· refine Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ f.closedBall_subset) ?_
rw [(extChartAt I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse]
theorem mem_Icc : f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
have : f x = 0 ∨ f x = _ := indicator_eq_zero_or_self _ _ _
rcases this with h | h <;> rw [h]
exacts [left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, ⟨f.nonneg, f.le_one⟩]
theorem nonneg : 0 ≤ f x :=
f.mem_Icc.1
theorem le_one : f x ≤ 1 :=
f.mem_Icc.2
theorem eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) < f.rIn) : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 := by
filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_extChartAt_preimage c isOpen_ball) ⟨hs, hd⟩]
rintro z ⟨hzs, hzd⟩
exact f.one_of_dist_le hzs <| le_of_lt hzd
theorem eventuallyEq_one : f =ᶠ[𝓝 c] 1 :=
f.eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt (mem_chart_source _ _) <| by rw [dist_self]; exact f.rIn_pos
@[simp]
theorem eq_one : f c = 1 :=
f.eventuallyEq_one.eq_of_nhds
theorem support_mem_nhds : support f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
f.eventuallyEq_one.mono fun x hx => by rw [hx]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem tsupport_mem_nhds : tsupport f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
mem_of_superset f.support_mem_nhds subset_closure
theorem c_mem_support : c ∈ support f :=
mem_of_mem_nhds f.support_mem_nhds
theorem nonempty_support : (support f).Nonempty :=
⟨c, f.c_mem_support⟩
theorem isCompact_symm_image_closedBall :
IsCompact ((extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I)) :=
((isCompact_closedBall _ _).inter_right I.isClosed_range).image_of_continuousOn <|
(continuousOn_extChartAt_symm _).mono f.closedBall_subset
end FiniteDimensional
/-- Given a smooth bump function `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`, the closed ball of radius `f.R` is
known to include the support of `f`. These closed balls (in the model normed space `E`) intersected
with `Set.range I` form a basis of `𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I c c)`. -/
theorem nhdsWithin_range_basis :
(𝓝[range I] extChartAt I c c).HasBasis (fun _ : SmoothBumpFunction I c => True) fun f =>
closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I := by
refine ((nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_closedBall _).restrict_subset
(extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin _)).to_hasBasis' ?_ ?_
· rintro R ⟨hR0, hsub⟩
exact ⟨⟨⟨R / 2, R, half_pos hR0, half_lt_self hR0⟩, hsub⟩, trivial, Subset.rfl⟩
· exact fun f _ => inter_mem (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| closedBall_mem_nhds _ f.rOut_pos)
self_mem_nhdsWithin
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
theorem isClosed_image_of_isClosed {s : Set M} (hsc : IsClosed s) (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
IsClosed (extChartAt I c '' s) := by
rw [f.image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support hs]
refine ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed
((continuousOn_extChartAt_symm _).mono f.closedBall_subset) ?_ hsc
exact IsClosed.inter isClosed_closedBall I.isClosed_range
/-- If `f` is a smooth bump function and `s` closed subset of the support of `f` (i.e., of the open
ball of radius `f.rOut`), then there exists `0 < r < f.rOut` such that `s` is a subset of the open
ball of radius `r`. Formally, `s ⊆ e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (ball (e c) r)`, where `e = extChartAt I c`. -/
theorem exists_r_pos_lt_subset_ball {s : Set M} (hsc : IsClosed s) (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
∃ r ∈ Ioo 0 f.rOut,
s ⊆ (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) r := by
set e := extChartAt I c
have : IsClosed (e '' s) := f.isClosed_image_of_isClosed hsc hs
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← image_subset_iff] at hs
rcases exists_pos_lt_subset_ball f.rOut_pos this hs.2 with ⟨r, hrR, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hrR, subset_inter hs.1 (image_subset_iff.1 hr)⟩
/-- Replace `rIn` with another value in the interval `(0, f.rOut)`. -/
@[simps rOut rIn]
def updateRIn (r : ℝ) (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.rOut) : SmoothBumpFunction I c :=
⟨⟨r, f.rOut, hr.1, hr.2⟩, f.closedBall_subset⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_updateRIn {r : ℝ} (hr : r ∈ Ioo 0 f.rOut) :
support (f.updateRIn r hr) = support f := by
simp only [support_eq_inter_preimage, updateRIn_rOut]
-- Porting note: was an `Inhabited` instance
instance : Nonempty (SmoothBumpFunction I c) := nhdsWithin_range_basis.nonempty
variable [T2Space M]
theorem isClosed_symm_image_closedBall :
IsClosed ((extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I)) :=
f.isCompact_symm_image_closedBall.isClosed
theorem tsupport_subset_symm_image_closedBall :
tsupport f ⊆ (extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) := by
rw [tsupport, support_eq_symm_image]
exact closure_minimal (image_subset _ <| inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall)
f.isClosed_symm_image_closedBall
theorem tsupport_subset_extChartAt_source : tsupport f ⊆ (extChartAt I c).source :=
calc
tsupport f ⊆ (extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) :=
f.tsupport_subset_symm_image_closedBall
_ ⊆ (extChartAt I c).symm '' (extChartAt I c).target := image_subset _ f.closedBall_subset
_ = (extChartAt I c).source := (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_eq_source
theorem tsupport_subset_chartAt_source : tsupport f ⊆ (chartAt H c).source := by
simpa only [extChartAt_source] using f.tsupport_subset_extChartAt_source
protected theorem hasCompactSupport : HasCompactSupport f :=
f.isCompact_symm_image_closedBall.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure
f.tsupport_subset_symm_image_closedBall
variable (c) in
/-- The closures of supports of smooth bump functions centered at `c` form a basis of `𝓝 c`.
In other words, each of these closures is a neighborhood of `c` and each neighborhood of `c`
includes `tsupport f` for some `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`. -/
theorem nhds_basis_tsupport :
(𝓝 c).HasBasis (fun _ : SmoothBumpFunction I c => True) fun f => tsupport f := by
have :
(𝓝 c).HasBasis (fun _ : SmoothBumpFunction I c => True) fun f =>
(extChartAt I c).symm '' (closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) := by
rw [← map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range (I := I) c]
exact nhdsWithin_range_basis.map _
exact this.to_hasBasis' (fun f _ => ⟨f, trivial, f.tsupport_subset_symm_image_closedBall⟩)
fun f _ => f.tsupport_mem_nhds
/-- Given `s ∈ 𝓝 c`, the supports of smooth bump functions `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c` such that
`tsupport f ⊆ s` form a basis of `𝓝 c`. In other words, each of these supports is a
neighborhood of `c` and each neighborhood of `c` includes `support f` for some
`f : SmoothBumpFunction I c` such that `tsupport f ⊆ s`. -/
theorem nhds_basis_support {s : Set M} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 c) :
(𝓝 c).HasBasis (fun f : SmoothBumpFunction I c => tsupport f ⊆ s) fun f => support f :=
((nhds_basis_tsupport c).restrict_subset hs).to_hasBasis'
(fun f hf => ⟨f, hf.2, subset_closure⟩) fun f _ => f.support_mem_nhds
variable [IsManifold I ∞ M]
/-- A smooth bump function is infinitely smooth. -/
protected theorem contMDiff : ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ f := by
refine contMDiff_of_tsupport fun x hx => ?_
have : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source := f.tsupport_subset_chartAt_source hx
refine ContMDiffAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ <| f.eqOn_source.eventuallyEq_of_mem <|
(chartAt H c).open_source.mem_nhds this
exact f.contDiffAt.contMDiffAt.comp _ (contMDiffAt_extChartAt' this)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smooth := SmoothBumpFunction.contMDiff
protected theorem contMDiffAt {x} : ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(ℝ) ∞ f x :=
f.contMDiff.contMDiffAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smoothAt := SmoothBumpFunction.contMDiffAt
protected theorem continuous : Continuous f :=
f.contMDiff.continuous
/-- If `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c` is a smooth bump function and `g : M → G` is a function smooth
on the source of the chart at `c`, then `f • g` is smooth on the whole manifold. -/
theorem contMDiff_smul {G} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G] {g : M → G}
(hg : ContMDiffOn I 𝓘(ℝ, G) ∞ g (chartAt H c).source) :
ContMDiff I 𝓘(ℝ, G) ∞ fun x => f x • g x := by
refine contMDiff_of_tsupport fun x hx => ?_
have : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source :=
-- Porting note: was a more readable `calc`
-- calc
-- x ∈ tsupport fun x => f x • g x := hx
| -- _ ⊆ tsupport f := tsupport_smul_subset_left _ _
-- _ ⊆ (chart_at _ c).source := f.tsupport_subset_chartAt_source
f.tsupport_subset_chartAt_source <| tsupport_smul_subset_left _ _ hx
exact f.contMDiffAt.smul ((hg _ this).contMDiffAt <| (chartAt _ _).open_source.mem_nhds this)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smooth_smul := contMDiff_smul
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/BumpFunction.lean | 316 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alena Gusakov, Bhavik Mehta, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Bhavik Mehta, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Hall.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
/-!
# Hall's Marriage Theorem
Given a list of finite subsets $X_1, X_2, \dots, X_n$ of some given set
$S$, P. Hall in [Hall1935] gave a necessary and sufficient condition for
there to be a list of distinct elements $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n$ with
$x_i\in X_i$ for each $i$: it is when for each $k$, the union of every
$k$ of these subsets has at least $k$ elements.
Rather than a list of finite subsets, one may consider indexed families
`t : ι → Finset α` of finite subsets with `ι` a `Fintype`, and then the list
of distinct representatives is given by an injective function `f : ι → α`
such that `∀ i, f i ∈ t i`, called a *matching*.
This version is formalized as `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective'`
in a separate module.
The theorem can be generalized to remove the constraint that `ι` be a `Fintype`.
As observed in [Halpern1966], one may use the constrained version of the theorem
in a compactness argument to remove this constraint.
The formulation of compactness we use is that inverse limits of nonempty finite sets
are nonempty (`nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system`), which uses the
Tychonoff theorem.
The core of this module is constructing the inverse system: for every finite subset `ι'` of
`ι`, we can consider the matchings on the restriction of the indexed family `t` to `ι'`.
## Main statements
* `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective` is in terms of `t : ι → Finset α`.
* `Fintype.all_card_le_rel_image_card_iff_exists_injective` is in terms of a relation
`r : α → β → Prop` such that `Rel.image r {a}` is a finite set for all `a : α`.
* `Fintype.all_card_le_filter_rel_iff_exists_injective` is in terms of a relation
`r : α → β → Prop` on finite types, with the Hall condition given in terms of
`finset.univ.filter`.
## TODO
* The statement of the theorem in terms of bipartite graphs is in preparation.
## Tags
Hall's Marriage Theorem, indexed families
-/
open Finset Function CategoryTheory
universe u v
/-- The set of matchings for `t` when restricted to a `Finset` of `ι`. -/
def hallMatchingsOn {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) (ι' : Finset ι) :=
{ f : ι' → α | Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ (x : {x // x ∈ ι'}), f x ∈ t x }
/-- Given a matching on a finset, construct the restriction of that matching to a subset. -/
def hallMatchingsOn.restrict {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) {ι' ι'' : Finset ι}
(h : ι' ⊆ ι'') (f : hallMatchingsOn t ι'') : hallMatchingsOn t ι' := by
refine ⟨fun i => f.val ⟨i, h i.property⟩, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨hinj, hc⟩ := f.property
refine ⟨?_, fun i => hc ⟨i, h i.property⟩⟩
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ hh
simpa only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk] using hinj hh
/-- When the Hall condition is satisfied, the set of matchings on a finite set is nonempty.
This is where `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_existsInjective'` comes into the argument. -/
theorem hallMatchingsOn.nonempty {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} [DecidableEq α] (t : ι → Finset α)
(h : ∀ s : Finset ι, #s ≤ #(s.biUnion t)) (ι' : Finset ι) :
Nonempty (hallMatchingsOn t ι') := by
classical
refine ⟨Classical.indefiniteDescription _ ?_⟩
apply (all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_existsInjective' fun i : ι' => t i).mp
intro s'
convert h (s'.image (↑)) using 1
· simp only [card_image_of_injective s' Subtype.coe_injective]
· rw [image_biUnion]
/-- This is the `hallMatchingsOn` sets assembled into a directed system.
-/
def hallMatchingsFunctor {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) :
(Finset ι)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max u v where
obj ι' := hallMatchingsOn t ι'.unop
map {_ _} g f := hallMatchingsOn.restrict t (CategoryTheory.leOfHom g.unop) f
instance hallMatchingsOn.finite {ι : Type u} {α : Type v} (t : ι → Finset α) (ι' : Finset ι) :
Finite (hallMatchingsOn t ι') := by
classical
rw [hallMatchingsOn]
let g : hallMatchingsOn t ι' → ι' → ι'.biUnion t := by
rintro f i
refine ⟨f.val i, ?_⟩
rw [mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨i, i.property, f.property.2 i⟩
apply Finite.of_injective g
intro f f' h
ext a
rw [funext_iff] at h
simpa [g] using h a
/-- This is the version of **Hall's Marriage Theorem** in terms of indexed
families of finite sets `t : ι → Finset α`. It states that there is a
set of distinct representatives if and only if every union of `k` of the
sets has at least `k` elements.
Recall that `s.biUnion t` is the union of all the sets `t i` for `i ∈ s`.
This theorem is bootstrapped from `Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective'`,
which has the additional constraint that `ι` is a `Fintype`.
-/
theorem Finset.all_card_le_biUnion_card_iff_exists_injective {ι : Type u} {α : Type v}
[DecidableEq α] (t : ι → Finset α) :
(∀ s : Finset ι, #s ≤ #(s.biUnion t)) ↔
∃ f : ι → α, Function.Injective f ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ t x := by
constructor
· intro h
-- Set up the functor
haveI : ∀ ι' : (Finset ι)ᵒᵖ, Nonempty ((hallMatchingsFunctor t).obj ι') := fun ι' =>
| hallMatchingsOn.nonempty t h ι'.unop
classical
haveI : ∀ ι' : (Finset ι)ᵒᵖ, Finite ((hallMatchingsFunctor t).obj ι') := by
intro ι'
rw [hallMatchingsFunctor]
infer_instance
-- Apply the compactness argument
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system (hallMatchingsFunctor t)
-- Interpret the resulting section of the inverse limit
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
·-- Build the matching function from the section
exact fun i =>
(u (Opposite.op ({i} : Finset ι))).val ⟨i, by simp only [Opposite.unop_op, mem_singleton]⟩
· -- Show that it is injective
intro i i'
have subi : ({i} : Finset ι) ⊆ {i, i'} := by simp
have subi' : ({i'} : Finset ι) ⊆ {i, i'} := by simp
rw [← Finset.le_iff_subset] at subi subi'
simp only
rw [← hu (CategoryTheory.homOfLE subi).op, ← hu (CategoryTheory.homOfLE subi').op]
let uii' := u (Opposite.op ({i, i'} : Finset ι))
exact fun h => Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mp (uii'.property.1 h)
· -- Show that it maps each index to the corresponding finite set
intro i
apply (u (Opposite.op ({i} : Finset ι))).property.2
· -- The reverse direction is a straightforward cardinality argument
rintro ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ s
rw [← Finset.card_image_of_injective s hf₁]
apply Finset.card_le_card
intro
rw [Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, hf₂ x⟩
/-- Given a relation such that the image of every singleton set is finite, then the image of every
finite set is finite. -/
instance {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [DecidableEq β] (r : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a : α, Fintype (Rel.image r {a})] (A : Finset α) : Fintype (Rel.image r A) := by
have h : Rel.image r A = (A.biUnion fun a => (Rel.image r {a}).toFinset : Set β) := by
ext
simp [Rel.image]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Hall/Basic.lean | 123 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Finite intervals in a disjoint union
This file provides the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for the disjoint sum and linear sum of two
orders and calculates the cardinality of their finite intervals.
-/
open Function Sum
namespace Finset
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ γ₁ γ₂ : Type*}
section SumLift₂
variable (f f₁ g₁ : α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁) (g f₂ g₂ : α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂)
/-- Lifts maps `α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁` and `α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂` to a map
`α₁ ⊕ α₂ → β₁ ⊕ β₂ → Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)`. Could be generalized to `Alternative` functors if we can
make sure to keep computability and universe polymorphism. -/
@[simp]
def sumLift₂ : ∀ (_ : α₁ ⊕ α₂) (_ : β₁ ⊕ β₂), Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)
| inl a, inl b => (f a b).map Embedding.inl
| inl _, inr _ => ∅
| inr _, inl _ => ∅
| inr a, inr b => (g a b).map Embedding.inr
variable {f f₁ g₁ g f₂ g₂} {a : α₁ ⊕ α₂} {b : β₁ ⊕ β₂} {c : γ₁ ⊕ γ₂}
theorem mem_sumLift₂ :
c ∈ sumLift₂ f g a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁ c₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c = inl c₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f a₁ b₁) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂ c₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inr c₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g a₂ b₂ := by
constructor
· rcases a with a | a <;> rcases b with b | b
· rw [sumLift₂, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩
· refine fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim
· refine fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim
· rw [sumLift₂, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩
· rintro (⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, h⟩ | ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, h⟩) <;> exact mem_map_of_mem _ h
theorem inl_mem_sumLift₂ {c₁ : γ₁} :
inl c₁ ∈ sumLift₂ f g a b ↔ ∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f a₁ b₁ := by
rw [mem_sumLift₂, or_iff_left]
· simp only [inl.injEq, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left']
rintro ⟨_, _, c₂, _, _, h, _⟩
exact inl_ne_inr h
theorem inr_mem_sumLift₂ {c₂ : γ₂} :
inr c₂ ∈ sumLift₂ f g a b ↔ ∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g a₂ b₂ := by
rw [mem_sumLift₂, or_iff_right]
· simp only [inr.injEq, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left']
rintro ⟨_, _, c₂, _, _, h, _⟩
exact inr_ne_inl h
theorem sumLift₂_eq_empty :
sumLift₂ f g a b = ∅ ↔
(∀ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ → b = inl b₁ → f a₁ b₁ = ∅) ∧
∀ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ → b = inr b₂ → g a₂ b₂ = ∅ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· constructor <;>
· rintro a b rfl rfl
exact map_eq_empty.1 h
cases a <;> cases b
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.1 _ _ rfl rfl)
· rfl
· rfl
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.2 _ _ rfl rfl)
theorem sumLift₂_nonempty :
(sumLift₂ f g a b).Nonempty ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ (f a₁ b₁).Nonempty) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ (g a₂ b₂).Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sumLift₂_eq_empty, not_and_or, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem sumLift₂_mono (h₁ : ∀ a b, f₁ a b ⊆ g₁ a b) (h₂ : ∀ a b, f₂ a b ⊆ g₂ a b) :
∀ a b, sumLift₂ f₁ f₂ a b ⊆ sumLift₂ g₁ g₂ a b
| inl _, inl _ => map_subset_map.2 (h₁ _ _)
| inl _, inr _ => Subset.rfl
| inr _, inl _ => Subset.rfl
| inr _, inr _ => map_subset_map.2 (h₂ _ _)
end SumLift₂
section SumLexLift
variable (f₁ f₁' : α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁) (f₂ f₂' : α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂)
(g₁ g₁' : α₁ → β₂ → Finset γ₁) (g₂ g₂' : α₁ → β₂ → Finset γ₂)
/-- Lifts maps `α₁ → β₁ → Finset γ₁`, `α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂`, `α₁ → β₂ → Finset γ₁`,
`α₂ → β₂ → Finset γ₂` to a map `α₁ ⊕ α₂ → β₁ ⊕ β₂ → Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)`. Could be generalized to
alternative monads if we can make sure to keep computability and universe polymorphism. -/
def sumLexLift : α₁ ⊕ α₂ → β₁ ⊕ β₂ → Finset (γ₁ ⊕ γ₂)
| inl a, inl b => (f₁ a b).map Embedding.inl
| inl a, inr b => (g₁ a b).disjSum (g₂ a b)
| inr _, inl _ => ∅
| inr a, inr b => (f₂ a b).map ⟨_, inr_injective⟩
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inl_inl (a : α₁) (b : β₁) :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inl a) (inl b) = (f₁ a b).map Embedding.inl := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inl_inr (a : α₁) (b : β₂) :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inl a) (inr b) = (g₁ a b).disjSum (g₂ a b) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inr_inl (a : α₂) (b : β₁) : sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inr a) (inl b) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma sumLexLift_inr_inr (a : α₂) (b : β₂) :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ (inr a) (inr b) = (f₂ a b).map ⟨_, inr_injective⟩ := rfl
variable {f₁ g₁ f₂ g₂ f₁' g₁' f₂' g₂'} {a : α₁ ⊕ α₂} {b : β₁ ⊕ β₂} {c : γ₁ ⊕ γ₂}
lemma mem_sumLexLift :
c ∈ sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁ c₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c = inl c₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f₁ a₁ b₁) ∨
(∃ a₁ b₂ c₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inl c₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ g₁ a₁ b₂) ∨
(∃ a₁ b₂ c₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inr c₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g₂ a₁ b₂) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂ c₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c = inr c₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
constructor
· obtain a | a := a <;> obtain b | b := b
· rw [sumLexLift, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩
· refine fun h ↦ (mem_disjSum.1 h).elim ?_ ?_
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr (Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· exact fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim
· rw [sumLexLift, mem_map]
rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inr <| ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· rintro (⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩ | ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩ |
⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩ | ⟨a, b, c, rfl, rfl, rfl, hc⟩)
· exact mem_map_of_mem _ hc
· exact inl_mem_disjSum.2 hc
· exact inr_mem_disjSum.2 hc
· exact mem_map_of_mem _ hc
lemma inl_mem_sumLexLift {c₁ : γ₁} :
inl c₁ ∈ sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ c₁ ∈ f₁ a₁ b₁) ∨
∃ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₁ ∈ g₁ a₁ b₂ := by
simp [mem_sumLexLift]
lemma inr_mem_sumLexLift {c₂ : γ₂} :
inr c₂ ∈ sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ↔
(∃ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ g₂ a₁ b₂) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ c₂ ∈ f₂ a₂ b₂ := by
simp [mem_sumLexLift]
lemma sumLexLift_mono (hf₁ : ∀ a b, f₁ a b ⊆ f₁' a b) (hf₂ : ∀ a b, f₂ a b ⊆ f₂' a b)
(hg₁ : ∀ a b, g₁ a b ⊆ g₁' a b) (hg₂ : ∀ a b, g₂ a b ⊆ g₂' a b) (a : α₁ ⊕ α₂)
(b : β₁ ⊕ β₂) : sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b ⊆ sumLexLift f₁' f₂' g₁' g₂' a b := by
cases a <;> cases b
exacts [map_subset_map.2 (hf₁ _ _), disjSum_mono (hg₁ _ _) (hg₂ _ _), Subset.rfl,
map_subset_map.2 (hf₂ _ _)]
lemma sumLexLift_eq_empty :
sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b = ∅ ↔
(∀ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ → b = inl b₁ → f₁ a₁ b₁ = ∅) ∧
(∀ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ → b = inr b₂ → g₁ a₁ b₂ = ∅ ∧ g₂ a₁ b₂ = ∅) ∧
∀ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ → b = inr b₂ → f₂ a₂ b₂ = ∅ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
any_goals rintro a b rfl rfl; exact map_eq_empty.1 h
· rintro a b rfl rfl; exact disjSum_eq_empty.1 h
cases a <;> cases b
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.1 _ _ rfl rfl)
· simp [h.2.1 _ _ rfl rfl]
· rfl
· exact map_eq_empty.2 (h.2.2 _ _ rfl rfl)
lemma sumLexLift_nonempty :
(sumLexLift f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ a b).Nonempty ↔
(∃ a₁ b₁, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inl b₁ ∧ (f₁ a₁ b₁).Nonempty) ∨
(∃ a₁ b₂, a = inl a₁ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ ((g₁ a₁ b₂).Nonempty ∨ (g₂ a₁ b₂).Nonempty)) ∨
∃ a₂ b₂, a = inr a₂ ∧ b = inr b₂ ∧ (f₂ a₂ b₂).Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, sumLexLift_eq_empty, not_and_or, exists_prop, not_forall]
end SumLexLift
end Finset
open Finset Function
namespace Sum
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### Disjoint sum of orders -/
| section Disjoint
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (α ⊕ β) where
finsetIcc := sumLift₂ Icc Icc
finsetIco := sumLift₂ Ico Ico
finsetIoc := sumLift₂ Ioc Ioc
finsetIoo := sumLift₂ Ioo Ioo
| Mathlib/Data/Sum/Interval.lean | 208 | 216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Gabriel Moise. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Moise, Yaël Dillies, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
/-!
# Incidence matrix of a simple graph
This file defines the unoriented incidence matrix of a simple graph.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix`: `G.incMatrix R` is the incidence matrix of `G` over the ring `R`.
## Main results
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix_mul_transpose_diag`: The diagonal entries of the product of
`G.incMatrix R` and its transpose are the degrees of the vertices.
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix_mul_transpose`: Gives a complete description of the product of
`G.incMatrix R` and its transpose; the diagonal is the degrees of each vertex, and the
off-diagonals are 1 or 0 depending on whether or not the vertices are adjacent.
* `SimpleGraph.incMatrix_transpose_mul_diag`: The diagonal entries of the product of the
transpose of `G.incMatrix R` and `G.inc_matrix R` are `2` or `0` depending on whether or
not the unordered pair is an edge of `G`.
## Implementation notes
The usual definition of an incidence matrix has one row per vertex and one column per edge.
However, this definition has columns indexed by all of `Sym2 α`, where `α` is the vertex type.
This appears not to change the theory, and for simple graphs it has the nice effect that every
incidence matrix for each `SimpleGraph α` has the same type.
## TODO
* Define the oriented incidence matrices for oriented graphs.
* Define the graph Laplacian of a simple graph using the oriented incidence matrix from an
arbitrary orientation of a simple graph.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph Sym2
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (R : Type*) {α : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph α)
/-- `G.incMatrix R` is the `α × Sym2 α` matrix whose `(a, e)`-entry is `1` if `e` is incident to
`a` and `0` otherwise. -/
noncomputable def incMatrix [Zero R] [One R] : Matrix α (Sym2 α) R := fun a =>
(G.incidenceSet a).indicator 1
variable {R}
theorem incMatrix_apply [Zero R] [One R] {a : α} {e : Sym2 α} :
G.incMatrix R a e = (G.incidenceSet a).indicator 1 e :=
rfl
/-- Entries of the incidence matrix can be computed given additional decidable instances. -/
theorem incMatrix_apply' [Zero R] [One R] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {a : α}
{e : Sym2 α} : G.incMatrix R a e = if e ∈ G.incidenceSet a then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [incMatrix, Set.indicator, Pi.one_apply]
section MulZeroOneClass
variable [MulZeroOneClass R] {a b : α} {e : Sym2 α}
theorem incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply : G.incMatrix R a e * G.incMatrix R b e =
(G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b).indicator 1 e := by
classical simp only [incMatrix, Set.indicator_apply, ite_zero_mul_ite_zero, Pi.one_apply, mul_one,
Set.mem_inter_iff]
theorem incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply_of_not_adj (hab : a ≠ b) (h : ¬G.Adj a b) :
G.incMatrix R a e * G.incMatrix R b e = 0 := by
rw [incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
rw [G.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_not_adj h hab]
exact Set.not_mem_empty e
theorem incMatrix_of_not_mem_incidenceSet (h : e ∉ G.incidenceSet a) : G.incMatrix R a e = 0 := by
rw [incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem h]
theorem incMatrix_of_mem_incidenceSet (h : e ∈ G.incidenceSet a) : G.incMatrix R a e = 1 := by
rw [incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem h, Pi.one_apply]
variable [Nontrivial R]
theorem incMatrix_apply_eq_zero_iff : G.incMatrix R a e = 0 ↔ e ∉ G.incidenceSet a := by
simp only [incMatrix_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero, Pi.one_apply, one_ne_zero]
theorem incMatrix_apply_eq_one_iff : G.incMatrix R a e = 1 ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet a := by
convert one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff
infer_instance
end MulZeroOneClass
section NonAssocSemiring
| variable [NonAssocSemiring R] {a : α} {e : Sym2 α}
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/IncMatrix.lean | 102 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
/-!
# Typeclasses for groups with an adjoined zero element
This file provides just the typeclass definitions, and the projection lemmas that expose their
members.
## Main definitions
* `GroupWithZero`
* `CommGroupWithZero`
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
universe u
-- We have to fix the universe of `G₀` here, since the default argument to
-- `GroupWithZero.div'` cannot contain a universe metavariable.
variable {G₀ : Type u} {M₀ : Type*}
/-- Typeclass for expressing that a type `M₀` with multiplication and a zero satisfies
`0 * a = 0` and `a * 0 = 0` for all `a : M₀`. -/
class MulZeroClass (M₀ : Type u) extends Mul M₀, Zero M₀ where
/-- Zero is a left absorbing element for multiplication -/
zero_mul : ∀ a : M₀, 0 * a = 0
/-- Zero is a right absorbing element for multiplication -/
mul_zero : ∀ a : M₀, a * 0 = 0
/-- A mixin for left cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsLeftCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication by a nonzero element is left cancellative. -/
protected mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, a ≠ 0 → a * b = a * c → b = c
section IsLeftCancelMulZero
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_left_cancel₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a * b = a * c) : b = c :=
IsLeftCancelMulZero.mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero ha h
theorem mul_right_injective₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : Function.Injective (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ => mul_left_cancel₀ ha
end IsLeftCancelMulZero
/-- A mixin for right cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsRightCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- Multiplicatin by a nonzero element is right cancellative. -/
protected mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero : ∀ {a b c : M₀}, b ≠ 0 → a * b = c * b → a = c
section IsRightCancelMulZero
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_right_cancel₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a * b = c * b) : a = c :=
IsRightCancelMulZero.mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero hb h
theorem mul_left_injective₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun a => a * b :=
fun _ _ => mul_right_cancel₀ hb
end IsRightCancelMulZero
/-- A mixin for cancellative multiplication by nonzero elements. -/
class IsCancelMulZero (M₀ : Type u) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop
extends IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀, IsRightCancelMulZero M₀
export MulZeroClass (zero_mul mul_zero)
attribute [simp] zero_mul mul_zero
/-- Predicate typeclass for expressing that `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`
for all `a` and `b` of type `G₀`. -/
class NoZeroDivisors (M₀ : Type*) [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] : Prop where
/-- For all `a` and `b` of `G₀`, `a * b = 0` implies `a = 0` or `b = 0`. -/
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {a b : M₀}, a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0
export NoZeroDivisors (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero)
/-- A type `S₀` is a "semigroup with zero” if it is a semigroup with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
class SemigroupWithZero (S₀ : Type u) extends Semigroup S₀, MulZeroClass S₀
/-- A typeclass for non-associative monoids with zero elements. -/
class MulZeroOneClass (M₀ : Type u) extends MulOneClass M₀, MulZeroClass M₀
/-- A type `M₀` is a “monoid with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element, and `0` is left
and right absorbing. -/
class MonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type u) extends Monoid M₀, MulZeroOneClass M₀, SemigroupWithZero M₀
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
/-- If `x` is multiplicative with respect to `f`, then so is any `x^n`. -/
theorem pow_mul_apply_eq_pow_mul {M : Type*} [Monoid M] (f : M₀ → M) {x : M₀}
(hx : ∀ y : M₀, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (n : ℕ) :
∀ (y : M₀), f (x ^ n * y) = f x ^ n * f y := by
induction n with
| zero => intro y; rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul, one_mul]
| succ n hn => intro y; rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hx, hn]
end MonoidWithZero
/-- A type `M` is a `CancelMonoidWithZero` if it is a monoid with zero element, `0` is left
and right absorbing, and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
class CancelMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends MonoidWithZero M₀, IsCancelMulZero M₀
/-- A type `M` is a commutative “monoid with zero” if it is a commutative monoid with zero
element, and `0` is left and right absorbing. -/
class CommMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoid M₀, MonoidWithZero M₀
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
theorem mul_left_inj' (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
(mul_left_injective₀ hc).eq_iff
theorem mul_right_inj' (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_right_injective₀ ha).eq_iff
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup M₀] [Zero M₀]
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsRightCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero :=
fun hb h => mul_left_cancel₀ hb <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _)) }
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero :=
fun hb h => mul_right_cancel₀ hb <| (mul_comm _ _).trans (h.trans (mul_comm _ _)) }
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero [IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isRightCancelMulZero with }
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero [IsRightCancelMulZero M₀] :
IsCancelMulZero M₀ :=
{ IsRightCancelMulZero.to_isLeftCancelMulZero with }
end CommSemigroup
/-- A type `M` is a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` if it is a commutative monoid with zero element,
`0` is left and right absorbing,
and left/right multiplication by a non-zero element is injective. -/
class CancelCommMonoidWithZero (M₀ : Type*) extends CommMonoidWithZero M₀, IsLeftCancelMulZero M₀
-- See note [lower cancel priority]
attribute [instance 75] CancelCommMonoidWithZero.toCommMonoidWithZero
instance (priority := 100) CancelCommMonoidWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero
[CancelCommMonoidWithZero M₀] : CancelMonoidWithZero M₀ :=
{ IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_isCancelMulZero (M₀ := M₀) with }
/-- Prop-valued mixin for a monoid with zero to be equipped with a cancelling division.
The obvious use case is groups with zero, but this condition is also satisfied by `ℕ`, `ℤ` and, more
generally, any euclidean domain. -/
class MulDivCancelClass (M₀ : Type*) [MonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] : Prop where
protected mul_div_cancel (a b : M₀) : b ≠ 0 → a * b / b = a
section MulDivCancelClass
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] [MulDivCancelClass M₀]
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel_right₀ (a : M₀) {b : M₀} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b / b = a :=
MulDivCancelClass.mul_div_cancel _ _ hb
end MulDivCancelClass
section MulDivCancelClass
variable [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] [Div M₀] [MulDivCancelClass M₀]
@[simp] lemma mul_div_cancel_left₀ (b : M₀) {a : M₀} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b / a = b := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ ha]
end MulDivCancelClass
/-- A type `G₀` is a “group with zero” if it is a monoid with zero element (distinct from `1`)
such that every nonzero element is invertible.
The type is required to come with an “inverse” function, and the inverse of `0` must be `0`.
Examples include division rings and the ordered monoids that are the
target of valuations in general valuation theory. -/
class GroupWithZero (G₀ : Type u) extends MonoidWithZero G₀, DivInvMonoid G₀, Nontrivial G₀ where
| /-- The inverse of `0` in a group with zero is `0`. -/
protected inv_zero : (0 : G₀)⁻¹ = 0
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean | 198 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
/-!
# Basic lemmas about ordered rings
-/
-- We should need only a minimal development of sets in order to get here.
assert_not_exists Set.Subsingleton
open Function Int
variable {α M R : Type*}
theorem IsSquare.nonneg [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsRightCancelAdd R]
[ZeroLEOneClass R] [ExistsAddOfLE R] [PosMulMono R] [AddLeftStrictMono R]
{x : R} (h : IsSquare x) : 0 ≤ x := by
rcases h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact mul_self_nonneg y
namespace MonoidHom
variable [Ring R] [Monoid M] [LinearOrder M] [MulLeftMono M] (f : R →* M)
theorem map_neg_one : f (-1) = 1 :=
(pow_eq_one_iff (Nat.succ_ne_zero 1)).1 <| by rw [← map_pow, neg_one_sq, map_one]
@[simp]
theorem map_neg (x : R) : f (-x) = f x := by rw [← neg_one_mul, map_mul, map_neg_one, one_mul]
theorem map_sub_swap (x y : R) : f (x - y) = f (y - x) := by rw [← map_neg, neg_sub]
end MonoidHom
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R] {a b x y : R} {n : ℕ}
theorem pow_add_pow_le (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hn : n ≠ 0) : x ^ n + y ^ n ≤ (x + y) ^ n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_one_of_ne_zero hn with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction k with
| zero => simp only [zero_add, pow_one, le_refl]
| succ k ih =>
let n := k.succ
have h1 := add_nonneg (mul_nonneg hx (pow_nonneg hy n)) (mul_nonneg hy (pow_nonneg hx n))
have h2 := add_nonneg hx hy
calc
x ^ (n + 1) + y ^ (n + 1) ≤ x * x ^ n + y * y ^ n + (x * y ^ n + y * x ^ n) := by
rw [pow_succ' _ n, pow_succ' _ n]
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right h1
_ = (x + y) * (x ^ n + y ^ n) := by
rw [add_mul, mul_add, mul_add, add_comm (y * x ^ n), ← add_assoc, ← add_assoc,
add_assoc (x * x ^ n) (x * y ^ n), add_comm (x * y ^ n) (y * y ^ n), ← add_assoc]
_ ≤ (x + y) ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [pow_succ' _ n]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (ih (Nat.succ_ne_zero k)) h2
attribute [bound] pow_le_one₀ one_le_pow₀
@[deprecated pow_le_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_le_pow_left {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hab : a ≤ b) : ∀ n, a ^ n ≤ b ^ n :=
pow_le_pow_left₀ ha hab
lemma pow_add_pow_le' (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ^ n + b ^ n ≤ 2 * (a + b) ^ n := by
rw [two_mul]
exact add_le_add (pow_le_pow_left₀ ha (le_add_of_nonneg_right hb) _)
(pow_le_pow_left₀ hb (le_add_of_nonneg_left ha) _)
end OrderedSemiring
section StrictOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a x y : R} {n m : ℕ}
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_left (h : x < y) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → x ^ n < y ^ n :=
pow_lt_pow_left₀ h hx
@[deprecated pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_left_strictMonoOn (hn : n ≠ 0) : StrictMonoOn (· ^ n : R → R) {a | 0 ≤ a} :=
pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ hn
@[deprecated pow_right_strictMono₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_right_strictMono (h : 1 < a) : StrictMono (a ^ ·) :=
pow_right_strictMono₀ h
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_right₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_right (h : 1 < a) (hmn : m < n) : a ^ m < a ^ n :=
pow_lt_pow_right₀ h hmn
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_iff_right₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff_right (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n < a ^ m ↔ n < m := pow_lt_pow_iff_right₀ h
@[deprecated pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
lemma pow_le_pow_iff_right (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m ↔ n ≤ m := pow_le_pow_iff_right₀ h
@[deprecated lt_self_pow₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem lt_self_pow (h : 1 < a) (hm : 1 < m) : a < a ^ m := lt_self_pow₀ h hm
@[deprecated pow_right_strictAnti₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_right_strictAnti (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : StrictAnti (a ^ ·) :=
pow_right_strictAnti₀ h₀ h₁
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) : a ^ m < a ^ n ↔ n < m :=
pow_lt_pow_iff_right_of_lt_one₀ h₀ h₁
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) (hmn : m < n) : a ^ n < a ^ m :=
pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one₀ h₀ h₁ hmn
@[deprecated pow_lt_self_of_lt_one₀ (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem pow_lt_self_of_lt_one (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a < 1) (hn : 1 < n) : a ^ n < a :=
pow_lt_self_of_lt_one₀ h₀ h₁ hn
end StrictOrderedSemiring
section StrictOrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a : R}
lemma sq_pos_of_neg (ha : a < 0) : 0 < a ^ 2 := by rw [sq]; exact mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg ha ha
end StrictOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
@[deprecated pow_le_pow_iff_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_le_pow_iff_left (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n ↔ a ≤ b :=
pow_le_pow_iff_left₀ ha hb hn
@[deprecated pow_lt_pow_iff_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_lt_pow_iff_left (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n < b ^ n ↔ a < b :=
pow_lt_pow_iff_left₀ ha hb hn
@[deprecated pow_right_injective₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_right_injective (ha₀ : 0 < a) (ha₁ : a ≠ 1) : Injective (a ^ ·) :=
pow_right_injective₀ ha₀ ha₁
@[deprecated pow_right_inj₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
lemma pow_right_inj (ha₀ : 0 < a) (ha₁ : a ≠ 1) : a ^ m = a ^ n ↔ m = n := pow_right_inj₀ ha₀ ha₁
@[deprecated sq_le_one_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem sq_le_one_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : a ^ 2 ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := sq_le_one_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated sq_lt_one_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem sq_lt_one_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : a ^ 2 < 1 ↔ a < 1 := sq_lt_one_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated one_le_sq_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem one_le_sq_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 1 ≤ a ^ 2 ↔ 1 ≤ a := one_le_sq_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated one_lt_sq_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem one_lt_sq_iff {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 1 < a ^ 2 ↔ 1 < a := one_lt_sq_iff₀ ha
@[deprecated lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n < b ^ n) : a < b :=
lt_of_pow_lt_pow_left₀ n hb h
@[deprecated le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem le_of_pow_le_pow_left (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_pow_le_pow_left₀ hn hb h
@[deprecated sq_eq_sq₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem sq_eq_sq {a b : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ a = b := sq_eq_sq₀ ha hb
@[deprecated lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a * a < b * b → a < b :=
lt_of_mul_self_lt_mul_self₀ hb
/-- A function `f : α → R` is nonarchimedean if it satisfies the ultrametric inequality
`f (a + b) ≤ max (f a) (f b)` for all `a b : α`. -/
def IsNonarchimedean {α : Type*} [Add α] (f : α → R) : Prop := ∀ a b : α, f (a + b) ≤ f a ⊔ f b
/-!
### Lemmas for canonically linear ordered semirings or linear ordered rings
The slightly unusual typeclass assumptions `[LinearOrderedSemiring R] [ExistsAddOfLE R]` cover two
more familiar settings:
* `[LinearOrderedRing R]`, eg `ℤ`, `ℚ` or `ℝ`
* `[CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemiring R]` (although we don't actually have this typeclass), eg `ℕ`,
`ℚ≥0` or `ℝ≥0`
-/
variable [ExistsAddOfLE R]
lemma add_sq_le : (a + b) ^ 2 ≤ 2 * (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) := by
calc
(a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + (a * b + b * a) := by
simp_rw [pow_succ', pow_zero, mul_one, add_mul, mul_add, add_comm (b * a), add_add_add_comm]
_ ≤ a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + (a * a + b * b) := add_le_add_left ?_ _
_ = _ := by simp_rw [pow_succ', pow_zero, mul_one, two_mul]
cases le_total a b
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul ‹_› ‹_›
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul' ‹_› ‹_›
-- TODO: Use `gcongr`, `positivity`, `ring` once those tactics are made available here
lemma add_pow_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : ∀ n, (a + b) ^ n ≤ 2 ^ (n - 1) * (a ^ n + b ^ n)
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| n + 2 => by
rw [pow_succ]
calc
_ ≤ 2 ^ n * (a ^ (n + 1) + b ^ (n + 1)) * (a + b) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (add_pow_le ha hb (n + 1)) <| add_nonneg ha hb
_ = 2 ^ n * (a ^ (n + 2) + b ^ (n + 2) + (a ^ (n + 1) * b + b ^ (n + 1) * a)) := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add, add_mul, add_mul, ← pow_succ, ← pow_succ, add_comm _ (b ^ _),
add_add_add_comm, add_comm (_ * a)]
_ ≤ 2 ^ n * (a ^ (n + 2) + b ^ (n + 2) + (a ^ (n + 1) * a + b ^ (n + 1) * b)) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (add_le_add_left ?_ _) <| pow_nonneg (zero_le_two (α := R)) _
_ = _ := by simp only [← pow_succ, ← two_mul, ← mul_assoc]; rfl
· obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul (pow_le_pow_left₀ ha hab _) hab
· exact mul_add_mul_le_mul_add_mul' (pow_le_pow_left₀ hb hba _) hba
protected lemma Even.add_pow_le (hn : Even n) :
(a + b) ^ n ≤ 2 ^ (n - 1) * (a ^ n + b ^ n) := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [← two_mul, pow_mul]
calc
_ ≤ (2 * (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2)) ^ n := pow_le_pow_left₀ (sq_nonneg _) add_sq_le _
_ = 2 ^ n * (a ^ 2 + b ^ 2) ^ n := by -- TODO: Should be `Nat.cast_commute`
rw [Commute.mul_pow]; simp [Commute, SemiconjBy, two_mul, mul_two]
_ ≤ 2 ^ n * (2 ^ (n - 1) * ((a ^ 2) ^ n + (b ^ 2) ^ n)) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(add_pow_le (sq_nonneg _) (sq_nonneg _) _) <| pow_nonneg (zero_le_two (α := R)) _
_ = _ := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, ← pow_add, ← pow_mul]
cases n
· rfl
· simp [Nat.two_mul]
lemma Even.pow_nonneg (hn : Even n) (a : R) : 0 ≤ a ^ n := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; rw [pow_add]; exact mul_self_nonneg _
lemma Even.pow_pos (hn : Even n) (ha : a ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n :=
(hn.pow_nonneg _).lt_of_ne' (pow_ne_zero _ ha)
lemma Even.pow_pos_iff (hn : Even n) (h₀ : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn; rw [pow_add, mul_self_pos, pow_ne_zero_iff (by simpa using h₀)]
lemma Odd.pow_neg_iff (hn : Odd n) : a ^ n < 0 ↔ a < 0 := by
refine ⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_nonneg · _), fun ha ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ((even_two_mul _).pow_pos ha.ne) ha
lemma Odd.pow_nonneg_iff (hn : Odd n) : 0 ≤ a ^ n ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 hn.pow_neg_iff
lemma Odd.pow_nonpos_iff (hn : Odd n) : a ^ n ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, le_iff_lt_or_eq, hn.pow_neg_iff, pow_eq_zero_iff]
rintro rfl; simp [Odd, eq_comm (a := 0)] at hn
lemma Odd.pow_pos_iff (hn : Odd n) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ 0 < a := lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le hn.pow_nonpos_iff
alias ⟨_, Odd.pow_nonpos⟩ := Odd.pow_nonpos_iff
alias ⟨_, Odd.pow_neg⟩ := Odd.pow_neg_iff
lemma Odd.strictMono_pow (hn : Odd n) : StrictMono fun a : R => a ^ n := by
have hn₀ : n ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp [Odd, eq_comm (a := 0)] at hn
intro a b hab
obtain ha | ha := le_total 0 a
· exact pow_lt_pow_left₀ hab ha hn₀
obtain hb | hb := lt_or_le 0 b
· exact (hn.pow_nonpos ha).trans_lt (pow_pos hb _)
obtain ⟨c, hac⟩ := exists_add_of_le ha
obtain ⟨d, hbd⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
have hd := nonneg_of_le_add_right (hb.trans_eq hbd)
refine lt_of_add_lt_add_right (a := c ^ n + d ^ n) ?_
dsimp
calc
a ^ n + (c ^ n + d ^ n) = d ^ n := by
rw [← add_assoc, hn.pow_add_pow_eq_zero hac.symm, zero_add]
_ < c ^ n := pow_lt_pow_left₀ ?_ hd hn₀
_ = b ^ n + (c ^ n + d ^ n) := by rw [add_left_comm, hn.pow_add_pow_eq_zero hbd.symm, add_zero]
refine lt_of_add_lt_add_right (a := a + b) ?_
rwa [add_rotate', ← hbd, add_zero, add_left_comm, ← add_assoc, ← hac, zero_add]
lemma Odd.pow_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Injective (· ^ n : R → R) :=
hn.strictMono_pow.injective
lemma Odd.pow_lt_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a b : R} : a ^ n < b ^ n ↔ a < b :=
hn.strictMono_pow.lt_iff_lt
lemma Odd.pow_le_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a b : R} : a ^ n ≤ b ^ n ↔ a ≤ b :=
hn.strictMono_pow.le_iff_le
lemma Odd.pow_inj {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a b : R} : a ^ n = b ^ n ↔ a = b :=
hn.pow_injective.eq_iff
lemma sq_pos_iff {a : R} : 0 < a ^ 2 ↔ a ≠ 0 := even_two.pow_pos_iff two_ne_zero
alias ⟨_, sq_pos_of_ne_zero⟩ := sq_pos_iff
alias pow_two_pos_of_ne_zero := sq_pos_of_ne_zero
lemma pow_four_le_pow_two_of_pow_two_le (h : a ^ 2 ≤ b) : a ^ 4 ≤ b ^ 2 :=
(pow_mul a 2 2).symm ▸ pow_le_pow_left₀ (sq_nonneg a) h 2
end LinearOrderedSemiring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Basic.lean | 339 | 343 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
/-!
# Integer logarithms in a field with respect to a natural base
This file defines two `ℤ`-valued analogs of the logarithm of `r : R` with base `b : ℕ`:
* `Int.log b r`: Lower logarithm, or floor **log**. Greatest `k` such that `↑b^k ≤ r`.
* `Int.clog b r`: Upper logarithm, or **c**eil **log**. Least `k` such that `r ≤ ↑b^k`.
Note that `Int.log` gives the position of the left-most non-zero digit:
```lean
#eval (Int.log 10 (0.09 : ℚ), Int.log 10 (0.10 : ℚ), Int.log 10 (0.11 : ℚ))
-- (-2, -1, -1)
#eval (Int.log 10 (9 : ℚ), Int.log 10 (10 : ℚ), Int.log 10 (11 : ℚ))
-- (0, 1, 1)
```
which means it can be used for computing digit expansions
```lean
import Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Floor
def digits (b : ℕ) (q : ℚ) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
⌊q * ((b : ℚ) ^ (n - Int.log b q))⌋₊ % b
#eval digits 10 (1/7) ∘ ((↑) : Fin 8 → ℕ)
-- ![1, 4, 2, 8, 5, 7, 1, 4]
```
## Main results
* For `Int.log`:
* `Int.zpow_log_le_self`, `Int.lt_zpow_succ_log_self`: the bounds formed by `Int.log`,
`(b : R) ^ log b r ≤ r < (b : R) ^ (log b r + 1)`.
* `Int.zpow_log_gi`: the galois coinsertion between `zpow` and `Int.log`.
* For `Int.clog`:
* `Int.zpow_pred_clog_lt_self`, `Int.self_le_zpow_clog`: the bounds formed by `Int.clog`,
`(b : R) ^ (clog b r - 1) < r ≤ (b : R) ^ clog b r`.
* `Int.clog_zpow_gi`: the galois insertion between `Int.clog` and `zpow`.
* `Int.neg_log_inv_eq_clog`, `Int.neg_clog_inv_eq_log`: the link between the two definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
variable {R : Type*} [Semifield R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] [FloorSemiring R]
namespace Int
/-- The greatest power of `b` such that `b ^ log b r ≤ r`. -/
def log (b : ℕ) (r : R) : ℤ :=
if 1 ≤ r then Nat.log b ⌊r⌋₊ else -Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
theorem log_of_one_le_right (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : 1 ≤ r) : log b r = Nat.log b ⌊r⌋₊ :=
if_pos hr
theorem log_of_right_le_one (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 1) : log b r = -Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊ := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [log, if_pos hr, inv_one, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right, Nat.clog_one_right,
Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
· exact if_neg hr.not_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem log_natCast (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : log b (n : R) = Nat.log b n := by
cases n
· simp [log_of_right_le_one]
· rw [log_of_one_le_right, Nat.floor_natCast]
simp
@[simp]
theorem log_ofNat (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
log b (ofNat(n) : R) = Nat.log b ofNat(n) :=
log_natCast b n
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (r : R) : log b r = 0 := by
rcases le_total 1 r with h | h
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ h, Nat.log_of_left_le_one hb, Int.ofNat_zero]
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h, Nat.clog_of_left_le_one hb, Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
theorem log_of_right_le_zero (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 0) : log b r = 0 := by
rw [log_of_right_le_one _ (hr.trans zero_le_one),
Nat.clog_of_right_le_one ((Nat.ceil_eq_zero.mpr <| inv_nonpos.2 hr).trans_le zero_le_one),
Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
theorem zpow_log_le_self {b : ℕ} {r : R} (hb : 1 < b) (hr : 0 < r) : (b : R) ^ log b r ≤ r := by
rcases le_total 1 r with hr1 | hr1
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ hr1]
rw [zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.le_floor_iff hr.le]
exact Nat.pow_log_le_self b (Nat.floor_pos.mpr hr1).ne'
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ hr1, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]
exact inv_le_of_inv_le₀ hr (Nat.ceil_le.1 <| Nat.le_pow_clog hb _)
theorem lt_zpow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (r : R) : r < (b : R) ^ (log b r + 1) := by
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with hr | hr
· rw [log_of_right_le_zero _ hr, zero_add, zpow_one]
exact hr.trans_lt (zero_lt_one.trans_le <| mod_cast hb.le)
rcases le_or_lt 1 r with hr1 | hr1
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ hr1]
rw [Int.ofNat_add_one_out, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]
apply Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
exact Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ hr1.le]
have hcri : 1 < r⁻¹ := (one_lt_inv₀ hr).2 hr1
have : 1 ≤ Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊ :=
Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.clog_pos hb <| Nat.one_lt_cast.1 <| hcri.trans_le (Nat.le_ceil _))
rw [neg_add_eq_sub, ← neg_sub, ← Int.ofNat_one, ← Int.ofNat_sub this, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast,
lt_inv_comm₀ hr (pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr <| zero_lt_one.trans hb) _), ← Nat.cast_pow]
refine Nat.lt_ceil.1 ?_
exact Nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self hb <| Nat.one_lt_cast.1 <| hcri.trans_le <| Nat.le_ceil _
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b (0 : R) = 0 :=
log_of_right_le_zero b le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b (1 : R) = 0 := by
rw [log_of_one_le_right _ le_rfl, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_left (r : R) : log 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [log, Nat.log_zero_left, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.clog_zero_left, neg_zero, ite_self]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left (r : R) : log 1 r = 0 := by
by_cases hr : 1 ≤ r
· simp_all only [log, ↓reduceIte, Nat.log_one_left, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [log, Nat.log_one_left, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.clog_one_left, neg_zero, ite_self]
theorem log_zpow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (z : ℤ) : log b (b ^ z : R) = z := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := Int.eq_nat_or_neg z
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ (one_le_zpow₀ (mod_cast hb.le) <| Int.natCast_nonneg _), zpow_natCast,
← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.floor_natCast, Nat.log_pow hb]
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ (zpow_le_one_of_nonpos₀ (mod_cast hb.le) <|
neg_nonpos.2 (Int.natCast_nonneg _)),
zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.ceil_natCast, Nat.clog_pow _ _ hb]
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b : ℕ} {r₁ r₂ : R} (h₀ : 0 < r₁) (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : log b r₁ ≤ log b r₂ := by
rcases le_total r₁ 1 with h₁ | h₁ <;> rcases le_total r₂ 1 with h₂ | h₂
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h₁, log_of_right_le_one _ h₂, neg_le_neg_iff, Int.ofNat_le]
exact Nat.clog_mono_right _ (Nat.ceil_mono <| inv_anti₀ h₀ h)
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h₁, log_of_one_le_right _ h₂]
exact (neg_nonpos.mpr (Int.natCast_nonneg _)).trans (Int.natCast_nonneg _)
· obtain rfl := le_antisymm h (h₂.trans h₁)
rfl
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ h₁, log_of_one_le_right _ h₂, Int.ofNat_le]
exact Nat.log_mono_right (Nat.floor_mono h)
variable (R) in
/-- Over suitable subtypes, `zpow` and `Int.log` form a galois coinsertion -/
def zpowLogGi {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) :
GaloisCoinsertion
(fun z : ℤ =>
Subtype.mk ((b : R) ^ z) <| zpow_pos (mod_cast zero_lt_one.trans hb) z)
fun r : Set.Ioi (0 : R) => Int.log b (r : R) :=
GaloisCoinsertion.monotoneIntro (fun r₁ _ => log_mono_right r₁.2)
(fun _ _ hz => Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| (zpow_right_strictMono₀ <| mod_cast hb).monotone hz)
(fun r => Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| zpow_log_le_self hb r.2) fun _ => log_zpow (R := R) hb _
/-- `zpow b` and `Int.log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. -/
theorem lt_zpow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℤ} {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) :
r < (b : R) ^ x ↔ log b r < x :=
@GaloisConnection.lt_iff_lt _ _ _ _ _ _ (zpowLogGi R hb).gc x ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- `zpow b` and `Int.log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. -/
theorem zpow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℤ} {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) :
(b : R) ^ x ≤ r ↔ x ≤ log b r :=
@GaloisConnection.le_iff_le _ _ _ _ _ _ (zpowLogGi R hb).gc x ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The least power of `b` such that `r ≤ b ^ log b r`. -/
def clog (b : ℕ) (r : R) : ℤ :=
if 1 ≤ r then Nat.clog b ⌈r⌉₊ else -Nat.log b ⌊r⁻¹⌋₊
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
theorem clog_of_one_le_right (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : 1 ≤ r) : clog b r = Nat.clog b ⌈r⌉₊ :=
if_pos hr
theorem clog_of_right_le_one (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 1) : clog b r = -Nat.log b ⌊r⁻¹⌋₊ := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [clog, if_pos hr, inv_one, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right,
Nat.clog_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
· exact if_neg hr.not_le
theorem clog_of_right_le_zero (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 0) : clog b r = 0 := by
rw [clog, if_neg (hr.trans_lt zero_lt_one).not_le, neg_eq_zero, Int.natCast_eq_zero,
Nat.log_eq_zero_iff]
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· exact Or.inr hb
· refine Or.inl (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hb)
exact Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one ((inv_nonpos.2 hr).trans zero_le_one)
@[simp]
theorem clog_inv (b : ℕ) (r : R) : clog b r⁻¹ = -log b r := by
rcases lt_or_le 0 r with hrp | hrp
· obtain hr | hr := le_total 1 r
· rw [clog_of_right_le_one _ (inv_le_one_of_one_le₀ hr), log_of_one_le_right _ hr, inv_inv]
· rw [clog_of_one_le_right _ ((one_le_inv₀ hrp).2 hr), log_of_right_le_one _ hr, neg_neg]
· rw [clog_of_right_le_zero _ (inv_nonpos.mpr hrp), log_of_right_le_zero _ hrp, neg_zero]
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (b : ℕ) (r : R) : log b r⁻¹ = -clog b r := by
rw [← inv_inv r, clog_inv, neg_neg, inv_inv]
-- note this is useful for writing in reverse
theorem neg_log_inv_eq_clog (b : ℕ) (r : R) : -log b r⁻¹ = clog b r := by rw [log_inv, neg_neg]
theorem neg_clog_inv_eq_log (b : ℕ) (r : R) : -clog b r⁻¹ = log b r := by rw [clog_inv, neg_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem clog_natCast (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : clog b (n : R) = Nat.clog b n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp [clog_of_right_le_one]
· rw [clog_of_one_le_right, (Nat.ceil_eq_iff (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).mpr] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem clog_ofNat (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
clog b (ofNat(n) : R) = Nat.clog b ofNat(n) :=
clog_natCast b n
theorem clog_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (r : R) : clog b r = 0 := by
rw [← neg_log_inv_eq_clog, log_of_left_le_one hb, neg_zero]
theorem self_le_zpow_clog {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (r : R) : r ≤ (b : R) ^ clog b r := by
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with hr | hr
· rw [clog_of_right_le_zero _ hr, zpow_zero]
exact hr.trans zero_le_one
rw [← neg_log_inv_eq_clog, zpow_neg, le_inv_comm₀ hr (zpow_pos ..)]
· exact zpow_log_le_self hb (inv_pos.mpr hr)
· exact Nat.cast_pos.mpr (zero_le_one.trans_lt hb)
theorem zpow_pred_clog_lt_self {b : ℕ} {r : R} (hb : 1 < b) (hr : 0 < r) :
(b : R) ^ (clog b r - 1) < r := by
rw [← neg_log_inv_eq_clog, ← neg_add', zpow_neg, inv_lt_comm₀ _ hr]
· exact lt_zpow_succ_log_self hb _
· exact zpow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr <| zero_le_one.trans_lt hb) _
@[simp]
theorem clog_zero_right (b : ℕ) : clog b (0 : R) = 0 :=
clog_of_right_le_zero _ le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_right (b : ℕ) : clog b (1 : R) = 0 := by
rw [clog_of_one_le_right _ le_rfl, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.clog_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero]
omit [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem clog_zero_left (r : R) : clog 0 r = 0 := by
by_cases hr : 1 ≤ r
· simp only [clog, Nat.clog_zero_left, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.log_zero_left, neg_zero, ite_self]
· simp only [clog, hr, ite_cond_eq_false, Nat.log_zero_left, Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero]
| omit [IsStrictOrderedRing R] in
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_left (r : R) : clog 1 r = 0 := by
simp only [clog, Nat.log_one_left, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.clog_one_left, neg_zero, ite_self]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Log.lean | 260 | 264 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
The theorems include formulas for computing coefficients, such as
`coeff_add`, `coeff_sum`, `coeff_mul`
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p + q) n = coeff p n + coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_add, coeff]
exact Finsupp.add_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (r • p) n = r • coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, coeff]
exact Finsupp.smul_apply _ _ _
theorem support_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) :
support (r • p) ⊆ support p := by
intro i hi
simp? [mem_support_iff] at hi ⊢ says simp only [mem_support_iff, coeff_smul, ne_eq] at hi ⊢
contrapose! hi
simp [hi]
open scoped Pointwise in
theorem card_support_mul_le : #(p * q).support ≤ #p.support * #q.support := by
calc #(p * q).support
_ = #(p.toFinsupp * q.toFinsupp).support := by rw [← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
_ ≤ #(p.toFinsupp.support + q.toFinsupp.support) :=
Finset.card_le_card (AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p.toFinsupp q.toFinsupp)
_ ≤ #p.support * #q.support := Finset.card_image₂_le ..
/-- `Polynomial.sum` as a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def lsum {R A M : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring A] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R A] [Module R M]
(f : ℕ → A →ₗ[R] M) : A[X] →ₗ[R] M where
toFun p := p.sum (f · ·)
map_add' p q := sum_add_index p q _ (fun n => (f n).map_zero) fun n _ _ => (f n).map_add _ _
map_smul' c p := by
rw [sum_eq_of_subset (f · ·) (fun n => (f n).map_zero) (support_smul c p)]
simp only [sum_def, Finset.smul_sum, coeff_smul, LinearMap.map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
variable (R) in
/-- The nth coefficient, as a linear map. -/
def lcoeff (n : ℕ) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun p := coeff p n
map_add' p q := coeff_add p q n
map_smul' r p := coeff_smul r p n
@[simp]
theorem lcoeff_apply (n : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : lcoeff R n f = coeff f n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem finset_sum_coeff {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (∑ b ∈ s, f b) n = ∑ b ∈ s, coeff (f b) n :=
map_sum (lcoeff R n) _ _
lemma coeff_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
l.sum.coeff n = (l.map (lcoeff R n)).sum :=
map_list_sum (lcoeff R n) _
lemma coeff_list_sum_map {ι : Type*} (l : List ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(l.map f).sum.coeff n = (l.map (fun a => (f a).coeff n)).sum := by
simp_rw [coeff_list_sum, List.map_map, Function.comp_def, lcoeff_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sum [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R → S[X]) :
coeff (p.sum f) n = p.sum fun a b => coeff (f a b) n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [Polynomial.sum, support_ofFinsupp, coeff_ofFinsupp]
/-- Decomposes the coefficient of the product `p * q` as a sum
over `antidiagonal`. A version which sums over `range (n + 1)` can be obtained
by using `Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ`. -/
theorem coeff_mul (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * q) n = ∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q n _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem mul_coeff_zero (p q : R[X]) : coeff (p * q) 0 = coeff p 0 * coeff q 0 := by simp [coeff_mul]
theorem mul_coeff_one (p q : R[X]) :
coeff (p * q) 1 = coeff p 0 * coeff q 1 + coeff p 1 * coeff q 0 := by
rw [coeff_mul, Nat.antidiagonal_eq_map]
simp [sum_range_succ]
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`,
defined as `coeff p 0`. This is a ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def constantCoeff : R[X] →+* R where
toFun p := coeff p 0
map_one' := coeff_one_zero
map_mul' := mul_coeff_zero
map_zero' := coeff_zero 0
map_add' p q := coeff_add p q 0
theorem isUnit_C {x : R} : IsUnit (C x) ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h => (congr_arg IsUnit coeff_C_zero).mp (h.map <| @constantCoeff R _), fun h => h.map C⟩
theorem coeff_mul_X_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (p * X) 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_X_mul_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (X * p) 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff (C x * X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then x else 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial]
congr 1
simp [eq_comm]
theorem coeff_C_mul_X (x : R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (C x * X : R[X]) n = if n = 1 then x else 0 := by
rw [← pow_one X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (p : R[X]) : coeff (C a * p) n = a * coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp_rw [← monomial_zero_left, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.single_zero_mul_apply p a n
theorem C_mul' (a : R) (f : R[X]) : C a * f = a • f := by
ext
rw [coeff_C_mul, coeff_smul, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff (p * C a) n = coeff p n * a := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp_rw [← monomial_zero_left, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_zero_apply p a n
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_natCast {a k : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (a : R[X])) k = coeff p k * (↑a : R) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_natCast_mul {a k : ℕ} :
coeff ((a : R[X]) * p) k = a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_ofNat {a k : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo a] :
coeff (p * (ofNat(a) : R[X])) k = coeff p k * ofNat(a) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_ofNat_mul {a k : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo a] :
coeff ((ofNat(a) : R[X]) * p) k = ofNat(a) * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_intCast [Ring S] {p : S[X]} {a : ℤ} {k : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (a : S[X])) k = coeff p k * (↑a : S) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_intCast_mul [Ring S] {p : S[X]} {a : ℤ} {k : ℕ} :
coeff ((a : S[X]) * p) k = a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow (k n : ℕ) : coeff (X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [one_mul, RingHom.map_one, ← coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff (X ^ n : R[X]) n = 1 := by simp
section Fewnomials
open Finset
theorem support_binomial {k m : ℕ} (hkm : k ≠ m) {x y : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) = {k, m} := by
apply subset_antisymm (support_binomial' k m x y)
simp_rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul,
coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow, if_neg hkm, if_neg hkm.symm, mul_zero, zero_add,
add_zero, Ne, hx, hy, not_false_eq_true, and_true]
theorem support_trinomial {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) {x y z : R} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) = {k, m, n} := by
apply subset_antisymm (support_trinomial' k m n x y z)
simp_rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul,
coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow, if_neg hkm.ne, if_neg hkm.ne', if_neg hmn.ne,
if_neg hmn.ne', if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne, if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne', mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_add, Ne, hx, hy, hz, not_false_eq_true, and_true]
theorem card_support_binomial {k m : ℕ} (h : k ≠ m) {x y : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
#(support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m)) = 2 := by
rw [support_binomial h hx hy, card_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_singleton.mp h), card_singleton]
theorem card_support_trinomial {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) {x y z : R} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) : #(support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n)) = 3 := by
rw [support_trinomial hkm hmn hx hy hz,
card_insert_of_not_mem
(mt mem_insert.mp (not_or_intro hkm.ne (mt mem_singleton.mp (hkm.trans hmn).ne))),
card_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_singleton.mp hmn.ne), card_singleton]
end Fewnomials
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff (p * Polynomial.X ^ n) (d + n) = coeff p d := by
rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_single (d, n), coeff_X_pow, if_pos rfl, mul_one]
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h1 h2
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
rintro rfl
apply h2
rw [mem_antidiagonal, add_right_cancel_iff] at h1
subst h1
rfl
· exact fun h1 => (h1 (mem_antidiagonal.2 rfl)).elim
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
coeff (Polynomial.X ^ n * p) (d + n) = coeff p d := by
rw [(commute_X_pow p n).eq, coeff_mul_X_pow]
theorem coeff_mul_X_pow' (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
(p * X ^ n).coeff d = ite (n ≤ d) (p.coeff (d - n)) 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le h, coeff_mul_X_pow, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· refine (coeff_mul _ _ _).trans (Finset.sum_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_)
rw [coeff_X_pow, if_neg, mul_zero]
exact ((le_of_add_le_right (mem_antidiagonal.mp hx).le).trans_lt <| not_le.mp h).ne
theorem coeff_X_pow_mul' (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) :
(X ^ n * p).coeff d = ite (n ≤ d) (p.coeff (d - n)) 0 := by
rw [(commute_X_pow p n).eq, coeff_mul_X_pow']
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p * X) (n + 1) = coeff p n := by
simpa only [pow_one] using coeff_mul_X_pow p 1 n
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (X * p) (n + 1) = coeff p n := by
rw [(commute_X p).eq, coeff_mul_X]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (p * monomial n r) (d + n) = coeff p d * r := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc, coeff_mul_C, coeff_mul_X_pow]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (p : R[X]) (n d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (monomial n r * p) (d + n) = r * coeff p d := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, X_pow_mul, coeff_mul_X_pow]
-- This can already be proved by `simp`.
theorem coeff_mul_monomial_zero (p : R[X]) (d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (p * monomial 0 r) d = coeff p d * r :=
coeff_mul_monomial p 0 d r
-- This can already be proved by `simp`.
theorem coeff_monomial_zero_mul (p : R[X]) (d : ℕ) (r : R) :
coeff (monomial 0 r * p) d = r * coeff p d :=
coeff_monomial_mul p 0 d r
theorem mul_X_pow_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (H : p * X ^ n = 0) : p = 0 :=
ext fun k => (coeff_mul_X_pow p n k).symm.trans <| ext_iff.1 H (k + n)
theorem isRegular_X_pow (n : ℕ) : IsRegular (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X^n : R[X]) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute (fun p => commute_X_pow p n)⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : X^n * P = X^n * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_pow_mul P n i, hPQ, coeff_X_pow_mul Q n i]
@[simp] theorem isRegular_X : IsRegular (X : R[X]) := pow_one (X : R[X]) ▸ isRegular_X_pow 1
theorem coeff_X_add_C_pow (r : R) (n k : ℕ) :
((X + C r) ^ n).coeff k = r ^ (n - k) * (n.choose k : R) := by
rw [(commute_X (C r : R[X])).add_pow, ← lcoeff_apply, map_sum]
simp only [one_pow, mul_one, lcoeff_apply, ← C_eq_natCast, ← C_pow, coeff_mul_C, Nat.cast_id]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single k, coeff_X_pow_self, one_mul]
· intro _ _ h
simp [coeff_X_pow, h.symm]
· simp only [coeff_X_pow_self, one_mul, not_lt, Finset.mem_range]
intro h
rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
theorem coeff_X_add_one_pow (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (n k : ℕ) :
((X + 1) ^ n).coeff k = (n.choose k : R) := by rw [← C_1, coeff_X_add_C_pow, one_pow, one_mul]
theorem coeff_one_add_X_pow (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (n k : ℕ) :
((1 + X) ^ n).coeff k = (n.choose k : R) := by rw [add_comm _ X, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : R[X]) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose c hc using h
classical
let c' : ℕ → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then c i else 0
let ψ : R[X] := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
ext i
simp only [c', ψ, coeff_C_mul, mem_support_iff, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff,
Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [Classical.not_not] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (a : R) : a • p = C a * p := by simp [ext_iff]
theorem update_eq_add_sub_coeff {R : Type*} [Ring R] (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
p.update n a = p + Polynomial.C (a - p.coeff n) * Polynomial.X ^ n := by
ext
rw [coeff_update_apply, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end Coeff
section cast
theorem natCast_coeff_zero {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [Semiring R] : (n : R[X]).coeff 0 = n := by
simp only [coeff_natCast_ite, ite_true]
@[norm_cast]
theorem natCast_inj {m n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [CharZero R] :
(↑m : R[X]) = ↑n ↔ m = n := by
constructor
· intro h
apply_fun fun p => p.coeff 0 at h
simpa using h
· rintro rfl
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_coeff_zero {i : ℤ} {R : Type*} [Ring R] : (i : R[X]).coeff 0 = i := by
cases i <;> simp
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_inj {m n : ℤ} {R : Type*} [Ring R] [CharZero R] : (↑m : R[X]) = ↑n ↔ m = n := by
constructor
· intro h
apply_fun fun p => p.coeff 0 at h
simpa using h
· rintro rfl
rfl
end cast
instance charZero [CharZero R] : CharZero R[X] where cast_injective _x _y := natCast_inj.mp
instance charP {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p where
cast_eq_zero_iff n := by
rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R, ← C_inj (R := R), map_natCast, C_0]
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Coeff.lean | 377 | 377 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Projection
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Sphere.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Circumcenter and circumradius
This file proves some lemmas on points equidistant from a set of
points, and defines the circumradius and circumcenter of a simplex.
There are also some definitions for use in calculations where it is
convenient to work with affine combinations of vertices together with
the circumcenter.
## Main definitions
* `circumcenter` and `circumradius` are the circumcenter and
circumradius of a simplex.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumscribed_circle
-/
noncomputable section
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
open AffineSubspace
/-- The induction step for the existence and uniqueness of the
circumcenter. Given a nonempty set of points in a nonempty affine
subspace whose direction is complete, such that there is a unique
(circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points in that subspace,
and a point `p` not in that subspace, there is a unique (circumcenter,
circumradius) pair for the set with `p` added, in the span of the
subspace with `p` added. -/
theorem existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P}
[s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] {ps : Set P} (hnps : ps.Nonempty) {p : P} (hps : ps ⊆ s)
(hp : p ∉ s) (hu : ∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ s ∧ ps ⊆ (cs : Set P)) :
∃! cs₂ : Sphere P,
cs₂.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (insert p (s : Set P)) ∧ insert p ps ⊆ (cs₂ : Set P) := by
haveI : Nonempty s := Set.Nonempty.to_subtype (hnps.mono hps)
rcases hu with ⟨⟨cc, cr⟩, ⟨hcc, hcr⟩, hcccru⟩
simp only at hcc hcr hcccru
let x := dist cc (orthogonalProjection s p)
let y := dist p (orthogonalProjection s p)
have hy0 : y ≠ 0 := dist_orthogonalProjection_ne_zero_of_not_mem hp
let ycc₂ := (x * x + y * y - cr * cr) / (2 * y)
let cc₂ := (ycc₂ / y) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ cc
let cr₂ := √(cr * cr + ycc₂ * ycc₂)
use ⟨cc₂, cr₂⟩
simp -zeta -proj only
have hpo : p = (1 : ℝ) • (p -ᵥ orthogonalProjection s p : V) +ᵥ (orthogonalProjection s p : P) :=
by simp
constructor
· constructor
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ (mem_affineSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hcc))
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(vsub_mem_vectorSpan ℝ (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (orthogonalProjection_mem _)))
· intro p₁ hp₁
rw [Sphere.mem_coe, mem_sphere, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))]
rcases hp₁ with hp₁ | hp₁
· rw [hp₁]
rw [hpo,
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, dist_comm _ cc]
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow
-- replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up. Reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [div_div, sub_div', one_mul, mul_div_assoc',
div_mul_eq_mul_div, add_div', eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff, ycc₂]
ring
· rw [dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp₁),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc, Subtype.coe_mk,
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp₁ hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V cc₂ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_div, abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ hy0, abs_mul_abs_self]
· rintro ⟨cc₃, cr₃⟩ ⟨hcc₃, hcr₃⟩
simp only at hcc₃ hcr₃
obtain ⟨t₃, cc₃', hcc₃', hcc₃''⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ, ∃ p0 ∈ s, cc₃ = r • (p -ᵥ ↑((orthogonalProjection s) p)) +ᵥ p0 := by
rwa [mem_affineSpan_insert_iff (orthogonalProjection_mem p)] at hcc₃
have hcr₃' : ∃ r, ∀ p₁ ∈ ps, dist p₁ cc₃ = r :=
⟨cr₃, fun p₁ hp₁ => dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp₁) hcr₃⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq hps cc₃, hcc₃'',
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃'] at hcr₃'
obtain ⟨cr₃', hcr₃'⟩ := hcr₃'
have hu := hcccru ⟨cc₃', cr₃'⟩
simp only at hu
replace hu := hu ⟨hcc₃', hcr₃'⟩
-- Porting note: was
-- cases' hu with hucc hucr
-- substs hucc hucr
cases hu
have hcr₃val : cr₃ = √(cr * cr + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)) := by
obtain ⟨p0, hp0⟩ := hnps
have h' : ↑(⟨cc, hcc₃'⟩ : s) = cc := rfl
rw [← dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp0) hcr₃, hcc₃'', ←
mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)),
dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq _ (hps hp0),
orthogonalProjection_vadd_smul_vsub_orthogonalProjection _ _ hcc₃', h',
dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere hp0 hcr, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ cc, vadd_vsub, norm_smul, ←
dist_eq_norm_vsub V p, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ |t₃|, ← mul_assoc,
abs_mul_abs_self]
ring
replace hcr₃ := dist_of_mem_subset_mk_sphere (Set.mem_insert _ _) hcr₃
rw [hpo, hcc₃'', hcr₃val, ← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg dist_nonneg (Real.sqrt_nonneg _),
dist_sq_smul_orthogonal_vadd_smul_orthogonal_vadd (orthogonalProjection_mem p) hcc₃' _ _
(vsub_orthogonalProjection_mem_direction_orthogonal s p),
dist_comm, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub V p,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _))] at hcr₃
change x * x + _ * (y * y) = _ at hcr₃
rw [show
x * x + (1 - t₃) * (1 - t₃) * (y * y) = x * x + y * y - 2 * y * (t₃ * y) + t₃ * y * (t₃ * y)
by ring,
add_left_inj] at hcr₃
have ht₃ : t₃ = ycc₂ / y := by field_simp [ycc₂, ← hcr₃, hy0]
subst ht₃
change cc₃ = cc₂ at hcc₃''
congr
rw [hcr₃val]
congr 2
field_simp [hy0]
/-- Given a finite nonempty affinely independent family of points,
there is a unique (circumcenter, circumradius) pair for those points
in the affine subspace they span. -/
theorem _root_.AffineIndependent.existsUnique_dist_eq {ι : Type*} [hne : Nonempty ι] [Finite ι]
{p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent ℝ p) :
∃! cs : Sphere P, cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range p) ∧ Set.range p ⊆ (cs : Set P) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
induction' hn : Fintype.card ι with m hm generalizing ι
· exfalso
have h := Fintype.card_pos_iff.2 hne
rw [hn] at h
exact lt_irrefl 0 h
· rcases m with - | m
· rw [Fintype.card_eq_one_iff] at hn
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn
haveI : Unique ι := ⟨⟨i⟩, hi⟩
use ⟨p i, 0⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton]
constructor
· simp_rw [hi default, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨⟨⟩, by simp only [Metric.sphere_zero, Set.mem_singleton_iff]⟩
· rintro ⟨cc, cr⟩
simp only
rintro ⟨rfl, hdist⟩
simp? [Set.singleton_subset_iff] at hdist says
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, Metric.mem_sphere, dist_self] at hdist
rw [hi default, hdist]
· have i := hne.some
let ι2 := { x // x ≠ i }
classical
have hc : Fintype.card ι2 = m + 1 := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype {x | x ≠ i}]
· rw [Finset.filter_not]
-- Porting note: removed `simp_rw [eq_comm]` and used `filter_eq'` instead of `filter_eq`
rw [Finset.filter_eq' _ i, if_pos (Finset.mem_univ _),
Finset.card_sdiff (Finset.subset_univ _), Finset.card_singleton, Finset.card_univ, hn]
simp
· simp
haveI : Nonempty ι2 := Fintype.card_pos_iff.1 (hc.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
have ha2 : AffineIndependent ℝ fun i2 : ι2 => p i2 := ha.subtype _
replace hm := hm ha2 _ hc
have hr : Set.range p = insert (p i) (Set.range fun i2 : ι2 => p i2) := by
change _ = insert _ (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2)
rw [← Set.image_eq_range, ← Set.image_univ, ← Set.image_insert_eq]
congr with j
simp [Classical.em]
rw [hr, ← affineSpan_insert_affineSpan]
refine existsUnique_dist_eq_of_insert (Set.range_nonempty _) (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) ?_ hm
convert ha.not_mem_affineSpan_diff i Set.univ
change (Set.range fun i2 : { x | x ≠ i } => p i2) = _
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
congr with j
simp
end EuclideanGeometry
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The circumsphere of a simplex. -/
def circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : Sphere P :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose
/-- The property satisfied by the circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_unique_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
(s.circumsphere.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧
Set.range s.points ⊆ s.circumsphere) ∧
∀ cs : Sphere P,
cs.center ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) ∧ Set.range s.points ⊆ cs →
cs = s.circumsphere :=
s.independent.existsUnique_dist_eq.choose_spec
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex. -/
def circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
s.circumsphere.center
/-- The circumradius of a simplex. -/
def circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : ℝ :=
s.circumsphere.radius
/-- The center of the circumsphere is the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_center {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.center = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The radius of the circumsphere is the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_radius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : s.circumsphere.radius = s.circumradius :=
rfl
/-- The circumcenter lies in the affine span. -/
theorem circumcenter_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
/-- All points have distance from the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
dist (s.points i) s.circumcenter = s.circumradius :=
dist_of_mem_subset_sphere (Set.mem_range_self _) s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- All points lie in the circumsphere. -/
theorem mem_circumsphere {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i ∈ s.circumsphere :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius i
/-- All points have distance to the circumcenter equal to the
circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius' {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
∀ i, dist s.circumcenter (s.points i) = s.circumradius := by
intro i
rw [dist_comm]
exact dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius _ _
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that point is the circumcenter. -/
theorem eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
p = s.circumcenter := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.1
/-- Given a point in the affine span from which all the points are
equidistant, that distance is the circumradius. -/
theorem eq_circumradius_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) {r : ℝ} (hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
r = s.circumradius := by
have h := s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 ⟨p, r⟩
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere] at h
-- Porting note: added the next three lines (`simp` less powerful)
rw [subset_sphere (s := ⟨p, r⟩)] at h
simp only [hp, hr, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true, subset_sphere, Sphere.ext_iff,
Set.forall_mem_range, mem_sphere, true_and] at h
exact h.2
/-- The circumradius is non-negative. -/
theorem circumradius_nonneg {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : 0 ≤ s.circumradius :=
s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius 0 ▸ dist_nonneg
/-- The circumradius of a simplex with at least two points is
positive. -/
theorem circumradius_pos {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 1)) : 0 < s.circumradius := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne s.circumradius_nonneg ?_
intro h
have hr := s.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius
simp_rw [← h, dist_eq_zero] at hr
have h01 := s.independent.injective.ne (by simp : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) ≠ 1)
simp [hr] at h01
/-- The circumcenter of a 0-simplex equals its unique point. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_point (s : Simplex ℝ P 0) (i : Fin 1) : s.circumcenter = s.points i := by
have h := s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have : Unique (Fin 1) := ⟨⟨0, by decide⟩, fun a => by simp only [Fin.eq_zero]⟩
simp only [Set.range_unique, AffineSubspace.mem_affineSpan_singleton] at h
rw [h]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- The circumcenter of a 1-simplex equals its centroid. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_centroid (s : Simplex ℝ P 1) :
s.circumcenter = Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points := by
have hr :
Set.Pairwise Set.univ fun i j : Fin 2 =>
dist (s.points i) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) =
dist (s.points j) (Finset.univ.centroid ℝ s.points) := by
intro i hi j hj hij
rw [Finset.centroid_pair_fin, dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points i),
dist_eq_norm_vsub V (s.points j), vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ←
one_smul ℝ (s.points i -ᵥ s.points 0), ← one_smul ℝ (s.points j -ᵥ s.points 0)]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [-one_smul, ← sub_smul] <;> norm_num
rw [Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
(s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq
(centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (Finset.card_fin 2)) fun i =>
hr i (Set.mem_univ _)).symm
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumsphere. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumsphere_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumsphere = s.circumsphere := by
refine s.circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.2 _ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rw [← s.reindex_range_points e]
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.1
· exact (s.reindex e).circumsphere_unique_dist_eq.1.2
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumcenter_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumcenter = s.circumcenter := by simp_rw [circumcenter, circumsphere_reindex]
/-- Reindexing a simplex along an `Equiv` of index types does not change the circumradius. -/
@[simp]
theorem circumradius_reindex {m n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P m) (e : Fin (m + 1) ≃ Fin (n + 1)) :
(s.reindex e).circumradius = s.circumradius := by simp_rw [circumradius, circumsphere_reindex]
attribute [local instance] AffineSubspace.toAddTorsor
theorem dist_circumcenter_sq_eq_sq_sub_circumradius {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p₁ : P}
(h₁ : ∀ i : Fin (n + 1), dist (s.points i) p₁ = r)
(h₁' : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p₁) = s.circumcenter)
(h : s.points 0 ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)) :
dist p₁ s.circumcenter * dist p₁ s.circumcenter = r * r - s.circumradius * s.circumradius := by
rw [dist_comm, ← h₁ 0,
s.dist_sq_eq_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq_add_dist_orthogonalProjection_sq p₁ h]
simp only [h₁', dist_comm p₁, add_sub_cancel_left, Simplex.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius]
/-- If there exists a distance that a point has from all vertices of a
simplex, the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace
spanned by that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P}
(hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) :
↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter := by
change ∃ r : ℝ, ∀ i, (fun x => dist x p = r) (s.points i) at hr
have hr : ∃ (r : ℝ), ∀ (a : P),
a ∈ Set.range (fun (i : Fin (n + 1)) => s.points i) → dist a p = r := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
use r
refine Set.forall_mem_range.mpr ?_
exact hr
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq (subset_affineSpan ℝ _) p] at hr
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hr
exact
s.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq (orthogonalProjection_mem p) fun i => hr _ (Set.mem_range_self i)
/-- If a point has the same distance from all vertices of a simplex,
the orthogonal projection of that point onto the subspace spanned by
that simplex is its circumcenter. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {p : P} {r : ℝ}
(hr : ∀ i, dist (s.points i) p = r) : ↑(s.orthogonalProjectionSpan p) = s.circumcenter :=
s.orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The orthogonal projection of the circumcenter onto a face is the
circumcenter of that face. -/
theorem orthogonalProjection_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))}
{m : ℕ} (h : #fs = m + 1) :
↑((s.face h).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) = (s.face h).circumcenter :=
haveI hr : ∃ r, ∀ i, dist ((s.face h).points i) s.circumcenter = r := by
use s.circumradius
simp [face_points]
orthogonalProjection_eq_circumcenter_of_exists_dist_eq _ hr
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same circumcenter. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.circumcenter = s₂.circumcenter := by
have hs : s₁.circumcenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s₂.points) :=
h ▸ s₁.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
have hr : ∀ i, dist (s₂.points i) s₁.circumcenter = s₁.circumradius := by
intro i
have hi : s₂.points i ∈ Set.range s₂.points := Set.mem_range_self _
rw [← h, Set.mem_range] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj⟩
rw [← hj, s₁.dist_circumcenter_eq_circumradius j]
exact s₂.eq_circumcenter_of_dist_eq hs hr
/-- An index type for the vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter.
This is for use in calculations where it is convenient to work with
affine combinations of vertices together with the circumcenter. (An
equivalent form sometimes used in the literature is placing the
circumcenter at the origin and working with vectors for the vertices.) -/
inductive PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n : ℕ)
| pointIndex : Fin (n + 1) → PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
| circumcenterIndex : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n
deriving Fintype
open PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
instance pointsWithCircumcenterIndexInhabited (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n) :=
⟨circumcenterIndex⟩
/-- `pointIndex` as an embedding. -/
def pointIndexEmbedding (n : ℕ) : Fin (n + 1) ↪ PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n :=
⟨fun i => pointIndex i, fun _ _ h => by injection h⟩
/-- The sum of a function over `PointsWithCircumcenterIndex`. -/
theorem sum_pointsWithCircumcenter {α : Type*} [AddCommMonoid α] {n : ℕ}
(f : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → α) :
∑ i, f i = (∑ i : Fin (n + 1), f (pointIndex i)) + f circumcenterIndex := by
classical
have h : univ = insert circumcenterIndex (univ.map (pointIndexEmbedding n)) := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun _ => mem_univ _⟩
obtain i | - := x
· exact mem_insert_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem _ (mem_univ i))
· exact mem_insert_self _ _
change _ = (∑ i, f (pointIndexEmbedding n i)) + _
rw [add_comm, h, ← sum_map, sum_insert]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map, not_exists]
rintro x ⟨_, h⟩
injection h
/-- The vertices of a simplex plus its circumcenter. -/
def pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → P
| pointIndex i => s.points i
| circumcenterIndex => s.circumcenter
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to a `pointIndex` value,
equals `points` applied to that value. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_point {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (pointIndex i) = s.points i :=
rfl
/-- `pointsWithCircumcenter`, applied to `circumcenterIndex`, equals the
circumcenter. -/
@[simp]
theorem pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.pointsWithCircumcenter circumcenterIndex = s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The weights for a single vertex of a simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex j => if j = i then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `point_weights_with_circumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_pointWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
∑ j, pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i j = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ (pointIndex i) (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- A single vertex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem point_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(i : Fin (n + 1)) :
s.points i =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_point]
symm
refine
affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _)
(by simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]) ?_
intro i hi hn
cases i
· have h : _ ≠ i := fun h => hn (h ▸ rfl)
simp [pointWeightsWithCircumcenter, h]
· rfl
/-- The weights for the centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i ∈ fs then (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => 0
/-- `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1, if the `Finset` is nonempty. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))} (h : fs.Nonempty) :
∑ i, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, add_zero, ←
fs.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty ℝ h, ← sum_indicator_subset _ fs.subset_univ]
rcongr
/-- The centroid of some vertices of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n)
(fs : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) :
fs.centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter fs) := by
simp_rw [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
pointsWithCircumcenter_point, zero_smul, add_zero, centroidWeights,
← sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero (Function.const (Fin (n + 1)) (#fs : ℝ)⁻¹)
(fun i wi => wi • (s.points i -ᵥ Classical.choice AddTorsor.nonempty)) fs.subset_univ fun _ =>
zero_smul ℝ _,
Set.indicator_apply]
congr
/-- The weights for the circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => 0
| circumcenterIndex => 1
/-- `circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
classical
convert sum_ite_eq' univ circumcenterIndex (Function.const _ (1 : ℝ)) with j
· cases j <;> simp [circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter]
· simp
/-- The circumcenter of a simplex, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [← pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter]
symm
refine affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_univ _) rfl ?_
rintro ⟨i⟩ _ hn <;> tauto
/-- The weights for the reflection of the circumcenter in an edge of a
simplex. This definition is only valid with `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then 1 else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -1
/-- `reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_ite,
sum_const, filter_or, filter_eq']
rw [card_union_of_disjoint]
· set_option simprocs false in simp
· simpa only [if_true, mem_univ, disjoint_singleton] using h
/-- The reflection of the circumcenter of a simplex in an edge, in
terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem reflection_circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P n) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
reflection (affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})) s.circumcenter =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex n)).affineCombination ℝ s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
have hc : #{i₁, i₂} = 2 := by simp [h]
-- Making the next line a separate definition helps the elaborator:
set W : AffineSubspace ℝ P := affineSpan ℝ (s.points '' {i₁, i₂})
have h_faces :
(orthogonalProjection W s.circumcenter : P) =
↑((s.face hc).orthogonalProjectionSpan s.circumcenter) := by
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_subspace
simp [W]
rw [EuclideanGeometry.reflection_apply, h_faces, s.orthogonalProjection_circumcenter hc,
circumcenter_eq_centroid, s.face_centroid_eq_centroid hc,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
affineCombination_vsub, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, affineCombination_vsub,
weightedVSub_apply, sum_pointsWithCircumcenter]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_smul, add_smul, sub_smul,
centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
reflectionCircumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter, ite_smul, zero_smul, sub_zero,
apply_ite₂ (· + ·), add_zero, ← add_smul, hc, zero_sub, neg_smul, sub_self, add_zero]
-- Porting note: was `convert sum_const_zero`
rw [← sum_const_zero]
congr
norm_num
end Simplex
end Affine
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open Affine AffineSubspace Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- Given a nonempty affine subspace, whose direction is complete,
that contains a set of points, those points are cospherical if and
only if they are equidistant from some point in that subspace. -/
theorem cospherical_iff_exists_mem_of_complete {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {ps : Set P} (h : ps ⊆ s)
[Nonempty s] [s.direction.HasOrthogonalProjection] :
| Cospherical ps ↔ ∃ center ∈ s, ∃ radius : ℝ, ∀ p ∈ ps, dist p center = radius := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨c, hcr⟩
rw [exists_dist_eq_iff_exists_dist_orthogonalProjection_eq h c] at hcr
exact ⟨orthogonalProjection s c, orthogonalProjection_mem _, hcr⟩
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Circumcenter.lean | 615 | 619 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 805 | 805 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Hom
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
/-!
# Tensor product of modules over commutative semirings.
This file constructs the tensor product of modules over commutative semirings. Given a semiring `R`
and modules over it `M` and `N`, the standard construction of the tensor product is
`TensorProduct R M N`. It is also a module over `R`.
It comes with a canonical bilinear map
`TensorProduct.mk R M N : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] TensorProduct R M N`.
Given any bilinear map `f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P`, there is a unique linear map
`TensorProduct.lift f : TensorProduct R M N →ₗ[R] P` whose composition with the canonical bilinear
map `TensorProduct.mk` is the given bilinear map `f`. Uniqueness is shown in the theorem
`TensorProduct.lift.unique`.
## Notation
* This file introduces the notation `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N` for the tensor product space
`TensorProduct R M N`.
* It introduces the notation `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n` for the tensor product of two elements,
otherwise written as `TensorProduct.tmul R m n`.
## Tags
bilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R' : Type*} [Monoid R']
variable {R'' : Type*} [Semiring R'']
variable {A M N P Q S T : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [AddCommMonoid Q] [AddCommMonoid S] [AddCommMonoid T]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R Q] [Module R S] [Module R T]
variable [DistribMulAction R' M]
variable [Module R'' M]
variable (M N)
namespace TensorProduct
section
variable (R)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (M × N)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → Prop
| of_zero_left : ∀ n : N, Eqv (.of (0, n)) 0
| of_zero_right : ∀ m : M, Eqv (.of (m, 0)) 0
| of_add_left : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (m₁, n) + .of (m₂, n)) (.of (m₁ + m₂, n))
| of_add_right : ∀ (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), Eqv (.of (m, n₁) + .of (m, n₂)) (.of (m, n₁ + n₂))
| of_smul : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (r • m, n)) (.of (m, r • n))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end
end TensorProduct
variable (R) in
/-- The tensor product of two modules `M` and `N` over the same commutative semiring `R`.
The localized notations are `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N`, accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def TensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).Quotient
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc TensorProduct] scoped[TensorProduct] infixl:100 " ⊗ " => TensorProduct _
@[inherit_doc] scoped[TensorProduct] notation:100 M " ⊗[" R "] " N:100 => TensorProduct R M N
namespace TensorProduct
section Module
protected instance zero : Zero (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).zero
protected instance add : Add (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).hasAdd
instance addZeroClass : AddZeroClass (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
/- The `toAdd` field is given explicitly as `TensorProduct.add` for performance reasons.
This avoids any need to unfold `Con.addMonoid` when the type checker is checking
that instance diagrams commute -/
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _
toZero := TensorProduct.zero _ _ }
instance addSemigroup : AddSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _ }
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
add_comm := fun x y =>
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨0⟩
variable {M N}
variable (R) in
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. The localized notations are `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n`,
accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def tmul (m : M) (n : N) : M ⊗[R] N :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (m, n)
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
infixl:100 " ⊗ₜ " => tmul _
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
notation:100 x " ⊗ₜ[" R "] " y:100 => tmul R x y
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : M ⊗[R] N → Prop} (z : M ⊗[R] N)
(zero : motive 0)
(tmul : ∀ x y, motive <| x ⊗ₜ[R] y)
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) : motive z :=
AddCon.induction_on z fun x =>
FreeAddMonoid.recOn x zero fun ⟨m, n⟩ y ih => by
rw [AddCon.coe_add]
exact add _ _ (tmul ..) ih
/-- Lift an `R`-balanced map to the tensor product.
A map `f : M →+ N →+ P` additive in both components is `R`-balanced, or middle linear with respect
to `R`, if scalar multiplication in either argument is equivalent, `f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)`.
Note that strictly the first action should be a right-action by `R`, but for now `R` is commutative
so it doesn't matter. -/
-- TODO: use this to implement `lift` and `SMul.aux`. For now we do not do this as it causes
-- performance issues elsewhere.
def liftAddHom (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) :
M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift (fun mn : M × N => f mn.1 mn.2)) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero,
AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add,
AddMonoidHom.add_apply]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, hf]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem liftAddHom_tmul (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) (m : M) (n : N) :
liftAddHom f hf (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem zero_tmul (n : N) : (0 : M) ⊗ₜ[R] n = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_left _
theorem add_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ + m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ n + m₂ ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_left _ _ _
variable (N) in
@[simp]
theorem tmul_zero (m : M) : m ⊗ₜ[R] (0 : N) = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_right _
theorem tmul_add (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ + n₂) = m ⊗ₜ n₁ + m ⊗ₜ[R] n₂ :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_right _ _ _
instance uniqueLeft [Subsingleton M] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0, zero_tmul]) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
instance uniqueRight [Subsingleton N] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim y 0, tmul_zero]) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
section
variable (R R' M N)
/-- A typeclass for `SMul` structures which can be moved across a tensor product.
This typeclass is generated automatically from an `IsScalarTower` instance, but exists so that
we can also add an instance for `AddCommGroup.toIntModule`, allowing `z •` to be moved even if
`R` does not support negation.
Note that `Module R' (M ⊗[R] N)` is available even without this typeclass on `R'`; it's only
needed if `TensorProduct.smul_tmul`, `TensorProduct.smul_tmul'`, or `TensorProduct.tmul_smul` is
used.
-/
class CompatibleSMul [DistribMulAction R' N] : Prop where
smul_tmul : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), (r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n)
end
/-- Note that this provides the default `CompatibleSMul R R M N` instance through
`IsScalarTower.left`. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompatibleSMul.isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M]
[DistribMulAction R' N] [IsScalarTower R' R N] : CompatibleSMul R R' M N :=
⟨fun r m n => by
conv_lhs => rw [← one_smul R m]
conv_rhs => rw [← one_smul R n]
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc]
exact Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _⟩
/-- `smul` can be moved from one side of the product to the other . -/
theorem smul_tmul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
(r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n) :=
CompatibleSMul.smul_tmul _ _ _
private def addMonoidWithWrongNSMul : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with }
attribute [local instance] addMonoidWithWrongNSMul in
/-- Auxiliary function to defining scalar multiplication on tensor product. -/
def SMul.aux {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) →+ M ⊗[R] N :=
FreeAddMonoid.lift fun p : M × N => (r • p.1) ⊗ₜ p.2
theorem SMul.aux_of {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
SMul.aux r (.of (m, n)) = (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
rfl
variable [SMulCommClass R R' M] [SMulCommClass R R'' M]
/-- Given two modules over a commutative semiring `R`, if one of the factors carries a
(distributive) action of a second type of scalars `R'`, which commutes with the action of `R`, then
the tensor product (over `R`) carries an action of `R'`.
This instance defines this `R'` action in the case that it is the left module which has the `R'`
action. Two natural ways in which this situation arises are:
* Extension of scalars
* A tensor product of a group representation with a module not carrying an action
Note that in the special case that `R = R'`, since `R` is commutative, we just get the usual scalar
action on a tensor product of two modules. This special case is important enough that, for
performance reasons, we define it explicitly below. -/
instance leftHasSMul : SMul R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun r =>
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (SMul.aux r : _ →+ M ⊗[R] N) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, smul_zero, zero_tmul]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, tmul_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, smul_add, add_tmul]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, tmul_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [SMul.aux_of, SMul.aux_of, ← smul_comm, smul_tmul]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]⟩
instance : SMul R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftHasSMul
protected theorem smul_zero (r : R') : r • (0 : M ⊗[R] N) = 0 :=
AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
protected theorem smul_add (r : R') (x y : M ⊗[R] N) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
protected theorem zero_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (0 : R'') • x = 0 :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, zero_smul, zero_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero]
protected theorem one_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (1 : R') • x = x :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, one_smul])
fun x y ihx ihy => by rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
protected theorem add_smul (r s : R'') (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero, add_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, add_smul, add_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addZeroClass _ _ with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
toZero := TensorProduct.zero _ _
nsmul := fun n v => n • v
nsmul_zero := by simp [TensorProduct.zero_smul]
nsmul_succ := by simp only [TensorProduct.one_smul, TensorProduct.add_smul, add_comm,
forall_const] }
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addCommSemigroup _ _ with
toAddMonoid := TensorProduct.addMonoid }
instance leftDistribMulAction : DistribMulAction R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
{ smul_add := fun r x y => TensorProduct.smul_add r x y
mul_smul := fun r s x =>
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, mul_smul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy]
one_smul := TensorProduct.one_smul
smul_zero := TensorProduct.smul_zero }
instance : DistribMulAction R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftDistribMulAction
theorem smul_tmul' (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) : r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tmul_smul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (x : M) (y : N) :
x ⊗ₜ (r • y) = r • x ⊗ₜ[R] y :=
(smul_tmul _ _ _).symm
theorem smul_tmul_smul (r s : R) (m : M) (n : N) : (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] (s • n) = (r * s) • m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul, mul_smul]
instance leftModule : Module R'' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ add_smul := TensorProduct.add_smul
zero_smul := TensorProduct.zero_smul }
instance : Module R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftModule
instance [Module R''ᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R'' M] : IsCentralScalar R'' (M ⊗[R] N) where
op_smul_eq_smul r x :=
x.induction_on (by rw [smul_zero, smul_zero])
(fun x y => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', op_smul_eq_smul]) fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
section
-- Like `R'`, `R'₂` provides a `DistribMulAction R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)`
variable {R'₂ : Type*} [Monoid R'₂] [DistribMulAction R'₂ M]
variable [SMulCommClass R R'₂ M]
/-- `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M` implies `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance smulCommClass_left [SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M] : SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N) where
smul_comm r' r'₂ x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul', smul_comm]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]; rw [ihx, ihy]
variable [SMul R'₂ R']
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_left [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
variable [DistribMulAction R'₂ N] [DistribMulAction R' N]
variable [CompatibleSMul R R'₂ M N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N]
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_right [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
end
/-- A short-cut instance for the common case, where the requirements for the `compatible_smul`
instances are sufficient. -/
instance isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M] : IsScalarTower R' R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.isScalarTower_left
-- or right
variable (R M N) in
/-- The canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mk : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (· ⊗ₜ ·) add_tmul (fun c m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul])
tmul_add tmul_smul
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (m : M) (n : N) : mk R M N m n = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem ite_tmul (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(if P then x₁ else 0) ⊗ₜ[R] x₂ = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem tmul_ite (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(x₁ ⊗ₜ[R] if P then x₂ else 0) = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
lemma tmul_single {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] (i : ι) (x : N) (m : M i) (j : ι) :
x ⊗ₜ[R] Pi.single i m j = (Pi.single i (x ⊗ₜ[R] m) : ∀ i, N ⊗[R] M i) j := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> aesop
lemma single_tmul {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] (i : ι) (x : N) (m : M i) (j : ι) :
Pi.single i m j ⊗ₜ[R] x = (Pi.single i (m ⊗ₜ[R] x) : ∀ i, M i ⊗[R] N) j := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> aesop
section
theorem sum_tmul {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (m : α → M) (n : N) :
(∑ a ∈ s, m a) ⊗ₜ[R] n = ∑ a ∈ s, m a ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, add_tmul, ih]
theorem tmul_sum (m : M) {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (n : α → N) :
(m ⊗ₜ[R] ∑ a ∈ s, n a) = ∑ a ∈ s, m ⊗ₜ[R] n a := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, tmul_add, ih]
end
variable (R M N)
/-- The simple (aka pure) elements span the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tmul_eq_top : Submodule.span R { t : M ⊗[R] N | ∃ m n, m ⊗ₜ n = t } = ⊤ := by
ext t; simp only [Submodule.mem_top, iff_true]
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro m n
apply Submodule.subset_span
use m, n
· intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
exact Submodule.add_mem _ ht₁ ht₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_top_top_eq_top : Submodule.map₂ (mk R M N) ⊤ ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2]
exact Submodule.span_mono fun _ ⟨m, n, h⟩ => ⟨m, trivial, n, trivial, h⟩
theorem exists_eq_tmul_of_forall (x : TensorProduct R M N)
(h : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), ∃ m n, m₁ ⊗ₜ n₁ + m₂ ⊗ₜ n₂ = m ⊗ₜ[R] n) :
∃ m n, x = m ⊗ₜ n := by
induction x with
| zero =>
use 0, 0
rw [TensorProduct.zero_tmul]
| tmul m n => use m, n
| add x y h₁ h₂ =>
obtain ⟨m₁, n₁, rfl⟩ := h₁
obtain ⟨m₂, n₂, rfl⟩ := h₂
apply h
end Module
variable [Module R P]
section UniversalProperty
variable {M N}
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P)
/-- Auxiliary function to constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def liftAux : M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
liftAddHom (LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom'.comp <| f.toAddMonoidHom)
fun r m n => by dsimp; rw [LinearMap.map_smul₂, map_smul]
theorem liftAux_tmul (m n) : liftAux f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem liftAux.smul (r : R) (x) : liftAux f (r • x) = r • liftAux f x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (smul_zero _).symm
(fun p q => by simp_rw [← tmul_smul, liftAux_tmul, (f p).map_smul])
fun p q ih1 ih2 => by simp_rw [smul_add, (liftAux f).map_add, ih1, ih2, smul_add]
variable (f) in
/-- Constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P` with the property that
its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ liftAux f with map_smul' := liftAux.smul }
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul (x y) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul' (x y) : (lift f).1 (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
theorem ext' {g h : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
LinearMap.ext fun z =>
TensorProduct.induction_on z (by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_zero]) H fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [g.map_add, h.map_add, ihx, ihy]
theorem lift.unique {g : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y) : g = lift f :=
ext' fun m n => by rw [H, lift.tmul]
theorem lift_mk : lift (mk R M N) = LinearMap.id :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => rfl
theorem lift_compr₂ (g : P →ₗ[R] Q) : lift (f.compr₂ g) = g.comp (lift f) :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => by simp
theorem lift_mk_compr₂ (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) : lift ((mk R M N).compr₂ f) = f := by
rw [lift_compr₂ f, lift_mk, LinearMap.comp_id]
/-- This used to be an `@[ext]` lemma, but it fails very slowly when the `ext` tactic tries to apply
it in some cases, notably when one wants to show equality of two linear maps. The `@[ext]`
attribute is now added locally where it is needed. Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of
`TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ _` and `N →ₗ _`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P} (H : (mk R M N).compr₂ g = (mk R M N).compr₂ h) : g = h := by
rw [← lift_mk_compr₂ g, H, lift_mk_compr₂]
attribute [local ext high] ext
example : M → N → (M → N → P) → P := fun m => flip fun f => f m
variable (R M N P) in
/-- Linearly constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def uncurry : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
LinearMap.flip <| lift <| LinearMap.lflip.comp (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
uncurry R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n := by rw [uncurry, LinearMap.flip_apply, lift.tmul]; rfl
variable (R M N P)
/-- A linear equivalence constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ uncurry R M N P with
invFun := fun f => (mk R M N).compr₂ f
left_inv := fun _ => LinearMap.ext₂ fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _
right_inv := fun _ => ext' fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
lift.equiv R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
uncurry_apply f m n
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_symm_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lcurry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem lcurry_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : lcurry R M N P f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def curry (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
lcurry R M N P f
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : curry f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) → M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :=
fun _ _ H => ext H
theorem ext_threefold {g h : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P →ₗ[R] Q}
(H : ∀ x y z, g (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext x y z
exact H x y z
-- We'll need this one for checking the pentagon identity!
theorem ext_fourfold {g h : ((M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P) ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, g (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext w x y z
exact H w x y z
/-- Two linear maps (M ⊗ N) ⊗ (P ⊗ Q) → S which agree on all elements of the
form (m ⊗ₜ n) ⊗ₜ (p ⊗ₜ q) are equal. -/
theorem ext_fourfold' {φ ψ : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, φ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z)) = ψ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z))) : φ = ψ := by
ext m n p q
exact H m n p q
end UniversalProperty
variable {M N}
section
variable (R M N)
/-- The tensor product of modules is commutative, up to linear equivalence.
-/
protected def comm : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (lift (mk R N M).flip) (lift (mk R M N).flip) (ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
(ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N) (m ⊗ₜ n) = n ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comm_symm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N).symm (n ⊗ₜ m) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
lemma lift_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :
lift f ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = lift f.flip :=
ext rfl
end
section CompatibleSMul
variable (R A M N) [CommSemiring A] [Module A M] [Module A N] [SMulCommClass R A M]
[CompatibleSMul R A M N]
/-- If M and N are both R- and A-modules and their actions on them commute,
and if the A-action on `M ⊗[R] N` can switch between the two factors, then there is a
canonical A-linear map from `M ⊗[A] N` to `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul : M ⊗[A] N →ₗ[A] M ⊗[R] N :=
lift
{ toFun := fun m ↦
{ __ := mk R M N m
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ (smul_tmul _ _ _).symm }
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ LinearMap.ext <| by simp
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
@[simp] theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul (m n) : mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_surjective : Function.Surjective (mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N) :=
fun x ↦ x.induction_on (⟨0, map_zero _⟩) (fun m n ↦ ⟨_, mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul ..⟩)
fun _ _ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨x + y, by simpa using congr($hx + $hy)⟩
attribute [local instance] SMulCommClass.symm
/-- `mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N` is also R-linear. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul' : M ⊗[A] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N where
__ := mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N
map_smul' _ x := x.induction_on (map_zero _) (fun _ _ ↦ by simp [smul_tmul'])
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simpa using congr($h + $h')
/-- If the R- and A-actions on M and N satisfy `CompatibleSMul` both ways,
then `M ⊗[A] N` is canonically isomorphic to `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def equivOfCompatibleSMul [CompatibleSMul A R M N] : M ⊗[A] N ≃ₗ[A] M ⊗[R] N where
__ := mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N
invFun := mapOfCompatibleSMul A R M N
left_inv x := x.induction_on (map_zero _) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simpa using congr($h + $h')
right_inv x := x.induction_on (map_zero _) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
fun _ _ h h' ↦ by simpa using congr($h + $h')
omit [SMulCommClass R A M]
end CompatibleSMul
open LinearMap
/-- The tensor product of a pair of linear maps between modules. -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
lift <| comp (compl₂ (mk _ _ _) g) f
@[simp]
theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) (n : N) : map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
/-- Given linear maps `f : M → P`, `g : N → Q`, if we identify `M ⊗ N` with `N ⊗ M` and `P ⊗ Q`
with `Q ⊗ P`, then this lemma states that `f ⊗ g = g ⊗ f`. -/
lemma map_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map f g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = TensorProduct.comm R Q P ∘ₗ map g f :=
ext rfl
lemma map_comm (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (x : N ⊗[R] M) :
map f g (TensorProduct.comm R N M x) = TensorProduct.comm R Q P (map g f x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_comp_comm_eq _ _) _
theorem map_range_eq_span_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
range (map f g) = Submodule.span R { t | ∃ m n, f m ⊗ₜ g n = t } := by
simp only [← Submodule.map_top, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map_span, Set.mem_image,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
congr; ext t
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨m, n, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩
use m, n
simp only [map_tmul]
· rintro ⟨m, n, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨m, n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [map_tmul]
/-- Given submodules `p ⊆ P` and `q ⊆ Q`, this is the natural map: `p ⊗ q → P ⊗ Q`. -/
@[simp]
def mapIncl (p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) : p ⊗[R] q →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
map p.subtype q.subtype
lemma range_mapIncl (p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) :
LinearMap.range (mapIncl p q) = Submodule.span R (Set.image2 (· ⊗ₜ ·) p q) := by
rw [mapIncl, map_range_eq_span_tmul]
congr; ext; simp
theorem map₂_eq_range_lift_comp_mapIncl (f : P →ₗ[R] Q →ₗ[R] M)
(p : Submodule R P) (q : Submodule R Q) :
Submodule.map₂ f p q = LinearMap.range (lift f ∘ₗ mapIncl p q) := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.range_comp, range_mapIncl, Submodule.map_span,
Set.image_image2, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2, lift.tmul]
section
variable {P' Q' : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R P']
variable [AddCommMonoid Q'] [Module R Q']
theorem map_comp (f₂ : P →ₗ[R] P') (f₁ : M →ₗ[R] P) (g₂ : Q →ₗ[R] Q') (g₁ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map f₂ g₂).comp (map f₁ g₁) :=
ext' fun _ _ => rfl
lemma range_mapIncl_mono {p p' : Submodule R P} {q q' : Submodule R Q} (hp : p ≤ p') (hq : q ≤ q') :
LinearMap.range (mapIncl p q) ≤ LinearMap.range (mapIncl p' q') := by
simp_rw [range_mapIncl]
exact Submodule.span_mono (Set.image2_subset hp hq)
theorem lift_comp_map (i : P →ₗ[R] Q →ₗ[R] Q') (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(lift i).comp (map f g) = lift ((i.comp f).compl₂ g) :=
ext' fun _ _ => rfl
attribute [local ext high] ext
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (id : M →ₗ[R] M) (id : N →ₗ[R] N) = .id := by
ext
simp only [mk_apply, id_coe, compr₂_apply, _root_.id, map_tmul]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : map (1 : M →ₗ[R] M) (1 : N →ₗ[R] N) = 1 :=
map_id
protected theorem map_mul (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M) (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] N) :
map (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) = map f₁ g₁ * map f₂ g₂ :=
map_comp f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) (n : ℕ) :
map f g ^ n = map (f ^ n) (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [pow_zero, TensorProduct.map_one]
| succ n ih => simp only [pow_succ', ih, TensorProduct.map_mul]
theorem map_add_left (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₁ + f₂) g = map f₁ g + map f₂ g := by
ext
simp only [add_tmul, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, add_apply]
theorem map_add_right (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map f (g₁ + g₂) = map f g₁ + map f g₂ := by
ext
simp only [tmul_add, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, add_apply]
theorem map_smul_left (r : R) (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map (r • f) g = r • map f g := by
ext
simp only [smul_tmul, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, smul_apply, tmul_smul]
theorem map_smul_right (r : R) (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map f (r • g) = r • map f g := by
ext
simp only [smul_tmul, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, smul_apply, tmul_smul]
variable (R M N P Q)
/-- The tensor product of a pair of linear maps between modules, bilinear in both maps. -/
def mapBilinear : (M →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R map map_add_left map_smul_left map_add_right map_smul_right
/-- The canonical linear map from `P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q)` to `(M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q)` -/
def lTensorHomToHomLTensor : P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
TensorProduct.lift (llcomp R M Q _ ∘ₗ mk R P Q)
/-- The canonical linear map from `(M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q` to `(M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q)` -/
def rTensorHomToHomRTensor : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
TensorProduct.lift (llcomp R M P _ ∘ₗ (mk R P Q).flip).flip
/-- The linear map from `(M →ₗ P) ⊗ (N →ₗ Q)` to `(M ⊗ N →ₗ P ⊗ Q)` sending `f ⊗ₜ g` to
the `TensorProduct.map f g`, the tensor product of the two maps. -/
def homTensorHomMap : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
lift (mapBilinear R M N P Q)
variable {R M N P Q}
/--
This is a binary version of `TensorProduct.map`: Given a bilinear map `f : M ⟶ P ⟶ Q` and a
bilinear map `g : N ⟶ S ⟶ T`, if we think `f` and `g` as linear maps with two inputs, then
`map₂ f g` is a bilinear map taking two inputs `M ⊗ N → P ⊗ S → Q ⊗ S` defined by
`map₂ f g (m ⊗ n) (p ⊗ s) = f m p ⊗ g n s`.
Mathematically, `TensorProduct.map₂` is defined as the composition
`M ⊗ N -map→ Hom(P, Q) ⊗ Hom(S, T) -homTensorHomMap→ Hom(P ⊗ S, Q ⊗ T)`.
-/
def map₂ (f : M →ₗ[R] P →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S →ₗ[R] T) :
M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] S →ₗ[R] Q ⊗[R] T :=
homTensorHomMap R _ _ _ _ ∘ₗ map f g
@[simp]
theorem mapBilinear_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : mapBilinear R M N P Q f g = map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensorHomToHomLTensor_apply (p : P) (f : M →ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) :
lTensorHomToHomLTensor R M P Q (p ⊗ₜ f) m = p ⊗ₜ f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rTensorHomToHomRTensor_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (q : Q) (m : M) :
rTensorHomToHomRTensor R M P Q (f ⊗ₜ q) m = f m ⊗ₜ q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomMap_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
homTensorHomMap R M N P Q (f ⊗ₜ g) = map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_apply_tmul (f : M →ₗ[R] P →ₗ[R] Q) (g : N →ₗ[R] S →ₗ[R] T) (m : M) (n : N) :
map₂ f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = map (f m) (g n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero_left (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map (0 : M →ₗ[R] P) g = 0 :=
(mapBilinear R M N P Q).map_zero₂ _
@[simp]
theorem map_zero_right (f : M →ₗ[R] P) : map f (0 : N →ₗ[R] Q) = 0 :=
(mapBilinear R M N P Q _).map_zero
end
/-- If `M` and `P` are linearly equivalent and `N` and `Q` are linearly equivalent
then `M ⊗ N` and `P ⊗ Q` are linearly equivalent. -/
def congr (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (map f g) (map f.symm g.symm)
(ext' fun m n => by simp)
(ext' fun m n => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem congr_tmul (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
congr f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem congr_symm_tmul (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (p : P) (q : Q) :
(congr f g).symm (p ⊗ₜ q) = f.symm p ⊗ₜ g.symm q :=
rfl
theorem congr_symm (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) : (congr f g).symm = congr f.symm g.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem congr_refl_refl : congr (.refl R M) (.refl R N) = .refl R _ :=
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| ext' fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem congr_trans (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (f' : P ≃ₗ[R] S) (g' : Q ≃ₗ[R] T) :
congr (f ≪≫ₗ f') (g ≪≫ₗ g') = congr f g ≪≫ₗ congr f' g' :=
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| map_comp _ _ _ _
theorem congr_mul (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (f' : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g' : N ≃ₗ[R] N) :
congr (f * f') (g * g') = congr f g * congr f' g' := congr_trans _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem congr_pow (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (n : ℕ) :
congr f g ^ n = congr (f ^ n) (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => exact congr_refl_refl.symm
| succ n ih => simp_rw [pow_succ, ih, congr_mul]
@[simp] theorem congr_zpow (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (n : ℤ) :
congr f g ^ n = congr (f ^ n) (g ^ n) := by
cases n with
| ofNat n => exact congr_pow _ _ _
| negSucc n => simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, congr_pow]; exact congr_symm _ _
end TensorProduct
open scoped TensorProduct
variable [Module R P]
namespace LinearMap
variable {N}
/-- `LinearMap.lTensor M f : M ⊗ N →ₗ M ⊗ P` is the natural linear map
induced by `f : N →ₗ P`. -/
def lTensor (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P :=
TensorProduct.map id f
/-- `LinearMap.rTensor M f : N₁ ⊗ M →ₗ N₂ ⊗ M` is the natural linear map
induced by `f : N₁ →ₗ N₂`. -/
def rTensor (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : N ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M :=
TensorProduct.map f id
variable (g : P →ₗ[R] Q) (f : N →ₗ[R] P)
theorem lTensor_def : f.lTensor M = TensorProduct.map LinearMap.id f := rfl
theorem rTensor_def : f.rTensor M = TensorProduct.map f LinearMap.id := rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : f.lTensor M (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ f n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : f.rTensor M (n ⊗ₜ m) = f n ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_comp_mk (m : M) :
f.lTensor M ∘ₗ TensorProduct.mk R M N m = TensorProduct.mk R M P m ∘ₗ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_comp_flip_mk (m : M) :
f.rTensor M ∘ₗ (TensorProduct.mk R N M).flip m = (TensorProduct.mk R P M).flip m ∘ₗ f :=
rfl
lemma comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
TensorProduct.comm R P Q ∘ₗ rTensor Q g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R Q N =
lTensor Q g :=
TensorProduct.ext rfl
lemma comm_comp_lTensor_comp_comm_eq (g : N →ₗ[R] P) :
TensorProduct.comm R Q P ∘ₗ lTensor Q g ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N Q =
rTensor Q g :=
TensorProduct.ext rfl
/-- Given a linear map `f : N → P`, `f ⊗ M` is injective if and only if `M ⊗ f` is injective. -/
theorem lTensor_inj_iff_rTensor_inj :
Function.Injective (lTensor M f) ↔ Function.Injective (rTensor M f) := by
simp [← comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq]
/-- Given a linear map `f : N → P`, `f ⊗ M` is surjective if and only if `M ⊗ f` is surjective. -/
theorem lTensor_surj_iff_rTensor_surj :
Function.Surjective (lTensor M f) ↔ Function.Surjective (rTensor M f) := by
simp [← comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq]
/-- Given a linear map `f : N → P`, `f ⊗ M` is bijective if and only if `M ⊗ f` is bijective. -/
theorem lTensor_bij_iff_rTensor_bij :
Function.Bijective (lTensor M f) ↔ Function.Bijective (rTensor M f) := by
simp [← comm_comp_rTensor_comp_comm_eq]
open TensorProduct
attribute [local ext high] TensorProduct.ext
/-- `lTensorHom M` is the natural linear map that sends a linear map `f : N →ₗ P` to `M ⊗ f`.
See also `Module.End.lTensorAlgHom`. -/
def lTensorHom : (N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P where
toFun := lTensor M
map_add' f g := by
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, add_apply, lTensor_tmul, tmul_add]
map_smul' r f := by
dsimp
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, tmul_smul, smul_apply, lTensor_tmul]
/-- `rTensorHom M` is the natural linear map that sends a linear map `f : N →ₗ P` to `f ⊗ M`.
See also `Module.End.rTensorAlgHom`. -/
def rTensorHom : (N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M where
toFun f := f.rTensor M
map_add' f g := by
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, add_apply, rTensor_tmul, add_tmul]
map_smul' r f := by
dsimp
ext x y
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, smul_tmul, tmul_smul, smul_apply, rTensor_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_lTensorHom : (lTensorHom M : (N →ₗ[R] P) → M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P) = lTensor M :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_rTensorHom : (rTensorHom M : (N →ₗ[R] P) → N ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M) = rTensor M :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_add (f g : N →ₗ[R] P) : (f + g).lTensor M = f.lTensor M + g.lTensor M :=
(lTensorHom M).map_add f g
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_add (f g : N →ₗ[R] P) : (f + g).rTensor M = f.rTensor M + g.rTensor M :=
(rTensorHom M).map_add f g
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_zero : lTensor M (0 : N →ₗ[R] P) = 0 :=
(lTensorHom M).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_zero : rTensor M (0 : N →ₗ[R] P) = 0 :=
(rTensorHom M).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_smul (r : R) (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : (r • f).lTensor M = r • f.lTensor M :=
(lTensorHom M).map_smul r f
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_smul (r : R) (f : N →ₗ[R] P) : (r • f).rTensor M = r • f.rTensor M :=
(rTensorHom M).map_smul r f
theorem lTensor_comp : (g.comp f).lTensor M = (g.lTensor M).comp (f.lTensor M) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, comp_apply, lTensor_tmul]
theorem lTensor_comp_apply (x : M ⊗[R] N) :
(g.comp f).lTensor M x = (g.lTensor M) ((f.lTensor M) x) := by rw [lTensor_comp, coe_comp]; rfl
theorem rTensor_comp : (g.comp f).rTensor M = (g.rTensor M).comp (f.rTensor M) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, comp_apply, rTensor_tmul]
theorem rTensor_comp_apply (x : N ⊗[R] M) :
(g.comp f).rTensor M x = (g.rTensor M) ((f.rTensor M) x) := by rw [rTensor_comp, coe_comp]; rfl
theorem lTensor_mul (f g : Module.End R N) : (f * g).lTensor M = f.lTensor M * g.lTensor M :=
lTensor_comp M f g
theorem rTensor_mul (f g : Module.End R N) : (f * g).rTensor M = f.rTensor M * g.rTensor M :=
rTensor_comp M f g
variable (N)
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_id : (id : N →ₗ[R] N).lTensor M = id :=
map_id
-- `simp` can prove this.
theorem lTensor_id_apply (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (LinearMap.id : N →ₗ[R] N).lTensor M x = x := by
rw [lTensor_id, id_coe, _root_.id]
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_id : (id : N →ₗ[R] N).rTensor M = id :=
map_id
-- `simp` can prove this.
theorem rTensor_id_apply (x : N ⊗[R] M) : (LinearMap.id : N →ₗ[R] N).rTensor M x = x := by
rw [rTensor_id, id_coe, _root_.id]
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_smul_action (r : R) :
(DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R N r).lTensor M =
DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R (M ⊗[R] N) r :=
(lTensor_smul M r LinearMap.id).trans (congrArg _ (lTensor_id M N))
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_smul_action (r : R) :
(DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R N r).rTensor M =
DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R (N ⊗[R] M) r :=
(rTensor_smul M r LinearMap.id).trans (congrArg _ (rTensor_id M N))
variable {N}
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_comp_rTensor (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(g.lTensor P).comp (f.rTensor N) = map f g := by
simp only [lTensor, rTensor, ← map_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_comp_lTensor (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(f.rTensor Q).comp (g.lTensor M) = map f g := by
simp only [lTensor, rTensor, ← map_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_rTensor (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (f' : S →ₗ[R] M) :
(map f g).comp (f'.rTensor _) = map (f.comp f') g := by
simp only [lTensor, rTensor, ← map_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_lTensor (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (g' : S →ₗ[R] N) :
(map f g).comp (g'.lTensor _) = map f (g.comp g') := by
simp only [lTensor, rTensor, ← map_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_comp_map (f' : P →ₗ[R] S) (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(f'.rTensor _).comp (map f g) = map (f'.comp f) g := by
simp only [lTensor, rTensor, ← map_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_comp_map (g' : Q →ₗ[R] S) (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(g'.lTensor _).comp (map f g) = map f (g'.comp g) := by
simp only [lTensor, rTensor, ← map_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
variable {M}
@[simp]
theorem rTensor_pow (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (n : ℕ) : f.rTensor N ^ n = (f ^ n).rTensor N := by
have h := TensorProduct.map_pow f (id : N →ₗ[R] N) n
rwa [Module.End.id_pow] at h
@[simp]
theorem lTensor_pow (f : N →ₗ[R] N) (n : ℕ) : f.lTensor M ^ n = (f ^ n).lTensor M := by
have h := TensorProduct.map_pow (id : M →ₗ[R] M) f n
rwa [Module.End.id_pow] at h
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable {N}
/-- `LinearEquiv.lTensor M f : M ⊗ N ≃ₗ M ⊗ P` is the natural linear equivalence
induced by `f : N ≃ₗ P`. -/
def lTensor (f : N ≃ₗ[R] P) : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] P := TensorProduct.congr (refl R M) f
/-- `LinearEquiv.rTensor M f : N₁ ⊗ M ≃ₗ N₂ ⊗ M` is the natural linear equivalence
induced by `f : N₁ ≃ₗ N₂`. -/
def rTensor (f : N ≃ₗ[R] P) : N ⊗[R] M ≃ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] M := TensorProduct.congr f (refl R M)
variable (g : P ≃ₗ[R] Q) (f : N ≃ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) (p : P) (x : M ⊗[R] N) (y : N ⊗[R] M)
@[simp] theorem coe_lTensor : lTensor M f = (f : N →ₗ[R] P).lTensor M := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_lTensor_symm : (lTensor M f).symm = (f.symm : P →ₗ[R] N).lTensor M := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_rTensor : rTensor M f = (f : N →ₗ[R] P).rTensor M := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_rTensor_symm : (rTensor M f).symm = (f.symm : P →ₗ[R] N).rTensor M := rfl
@[simp] theorem lTensor_tmul : f.lTensor M (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ f n := rfl
@[simp] theorem lTensor_symm_tmul : (f.lTensor M).symm (m ⊗ₜ p) = m ⊗ₜ f.symm p := rfl
@[simp] theorem rTensor_tmul : f.rTensor M (n ⊗ₜ m) = f n ⊗ₜ m := rfl
@[simp] theorem rTensor_symm_tmul : (f.rTensor M).symm (p ⊗ₜ m) = f.symm p ⊗ₜ m := rfl
lemma comm_trans_rTensor_trans_comm_eq (g : N ≃ₗ[R] P) :
TensorProduct.comm R Q N ≪≫ₗ rTensor Q g ≪≫ₗ TensorProduct.comm R P Q = lTensor Q g :=
toLinearMap_injective <| TensorProduct.ext rfl
lemma comm_trans_lTensor_trans_comm_eq (g : N ≃ₗ[R] P) :
TensorProduct.comm R N Q ≪≫ₗ lTensor Q g ≪≫ₗ TensorProduct.comm R Q P = rTensor Q g :=
toLinearMap_injective <| TensorProduct.ext rfl
theorem lTensor_trans : (f ≪≫ₗ g).lTensor M = f.lTensor M ≪≫ₗ g.lTensor M :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.lTensor_comp M _ _
theorem lTensor_trans_apply : (f ≪≫ₗ g).lTensor M x = g.lTensor M (f.lTensor M x) :=
LinearMap.lTensor_comp_apply M _ _ x
theorem rTensor_trans : (f ≪≫ₗ g).rTensor M = f.rTensor M ≪≫ₗ g.rTensor M :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.rTensor_comp M _ _
theorem rTensor_trans_apply : (f ≪≫ₗ g).rTensor M y = g.rTensor M (f.rTensor M y) :=
LinearMap.rTensor_comp_apply M _ _ y
theorem lTensor_mul (f g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) : (f * g).lTensor M = f.lTensor M * g.lTensor M :=
lTensor_trans M f g
theorem rTensor_mul (f g : N ≃ₗ[R] N) : (f * g).rTensor M = f.rTensor M * g.rTensor M :=
rTensor_trans M f g
variable (N)
@[simp] theorem lTensor_refl : (refl R N).lTensor M = refl R _ := TensorProduct.congr_refl_refl
theorem lTensor_refl_apply : (refl R N).lTensor M x = x := by rw [lTensor_refl, refl_apply]
@[simp] theorem rTensor_refl : (refl R N).rTensor M = refl R _ := TensorProduct.congr_refl_refl
theorem rTensor_refl_apply : (refl R N).rTensor M y = y := by rw [rTensor_refl, refl_apply]
variable {N}
@[simp] theorem rTensor_trans_lTensor (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) :
f.rTensor N ≪≫ₗ g.lTensor P = TensorProduct.congr f g :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.lTensor_comp_rTensor M _ _
@[simp] theorem lTensor_trans_rTensor (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) :
g.lTensor M ≪≫ₗ f.rTensor Q = TensorProduct.congr f g :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.rTensor_comp_lTensor M _ _
@[simp] theorem rTensor_trans_congr (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (f' : S ≃ₗ[R] M) :
f'.rTensor _ ≪≫ₗ TensorProduct.congr f g = TensorProduct.congr (f' ≪≫ₗ f) g :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.map_comp_rTensor M _ _ _
@[simp] theorem lTensor_trans_congr (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) (g' : S ≃ₗ[R] N) :
g'.lTensor _ ≪≫ₗ TensorProduct.congr f g = TensorProduct.congr f (g' ≪≫ₗ g) :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.map_comp_lTensor M _ _ _
@[simp] theorem congr_trans_rTensor (f' : P ≃ₗ[R] S) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) :
TensorProduct.congr f g ≪≫ₗ f'.rTensor _ = TensorProduct.congr (f ≪≫ₗ f') g :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.rTensor_comp_map M _ _ _
@[simp] theorem congr_trans_lTensor (g' : Q ≃ₗ[R] S) (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (g : N ≃ₗ[R] Q) :
TensorProduct.congr f g ≪≫ₗ g'.lTensor _ = TensorProduct.congr f (g ≪≫ₗ g') :=
toLinearMap_injective <| LinearMap.lTensor_comp_map M _ _ _
variable {M}
@[simp] theorem rTensor_pow (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (n : ℕ) : f.rTensor N ^ n = (f ^ n).rTensor N := by
simpa only [one_pow] using TensorProduct.congr_pow f (1 : N ≃ₗ[R] N) n
@[simp] theorem rTensor_zpow (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M) (n : ℤ) : f.rTensor N ^ n = (f ^ n).rTensor N := by
simpa only [one_zpow] using TensorProduct.congr_zpow f (1 : N ≃ₗ[R] N) n
@[simp] theorem lTensor_pow (f : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (n : ℕ) : f.lTensor M ^ n = (f ^ n).lTensor M := by
simpa only [one_pow] using TensorProduct.congr_pow (1 : M ≃ₗ[R] M) f n
@[simp] theorem lTensor_zpow (f : N ≃ₗ[R] N) (n : ℤ) : f.lTensor M ^ n = (f ^ n).lTensor M := by
simpa only [one_zpow] using TensorProduct.congr_zpow (1 : M ≃ₗ[R] M) f n
end LinearEquiv
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {Q : Type*} {S : Type*}
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [AddCommGroup P] [AddCommGroup Q] [AddCommGroup S]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q] [Module R S]
namespace TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
open LinearMap
variable (R) in
/-- Auxiliary function to defining negation multiplication on tensor product. -/
def Neg.aux : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
lift <| (mk R M N).comp (-LinearMap.id)
instance neg : Neg (M ⊗[R] N) where
neg := Neg.aux R
protected theorem neg_add_cancel (x : M ⊗[R] N) : -x + x = 0 :=
x.induction_on
(by rw [add_zero]; apply (Neg.aux R).map_zero)
(fun x y => by convert (add_tmul (R := R) (-x) x y).symm; rw [neg_add_cancel, zero_tmul])
fun x y hx hy => by
suffices -x + x + (-y + y) = 0 by
rw [← this]
unfold Neg.neg neg
simp only
rw [map_add]
abel
rw [hx, hy, add_zero]
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addCommMonoid with
neg := Neg.neg
sub := _
sub_eq_add_neg := fun _ _ => rfl
neg_add_cancel := fun x => TensorProduct.neg_add_cancel x
zsmul := fun n v => n • v
zsmul_zero' := by simp [TensorProduct.zero_smul]
zsmul_succ' := by simp [add_comm, TensorProduct.one_smul, TensorProduct.add_smul]
zsmul_neg' := fun n x => by
change (-n.succ : ℤ) • x = -(((n : ℤ) + 1) • x)
rw [← zero_add (_ • x), ← TensorProduct.neg_add_cancel ((n.succ : ℤ) • x), add_assoc,
← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self, zero_smul, add_zero]
rfl }
theorem neg_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (-m) ⊗ₜ n = -m ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
rfl
theorem tmul_neg (m : M) (n : N) : m ⊗ₜ (-n) = -m ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
(mk R M N _).map_neg _
theorem tmul_sub (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ - n₂) = m ⊗ₜ[R] n₁ - m ⊗ₜ[R] n₂ :=
(mk R M N _).map_sub _ _
theorem sub_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ - m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ[R] n - m₂ ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
(mk R M N).map_sub₂ _ _ _
/-- While the tensor product will automatically inherit a ℤ-module structure from
`AddCommGroup.toIntModule`, that structure won't be compatible with lemmas like `tmul_smul` unless
we use a `ℤ-Module` instance provided by `TensorProduct.left_module`.
When `R` is a `Ring` we get the required `TensorProduct.compatible_smul` instance through
`IsScalarTower`, but when it is only a `Semiring` we need to build it from scratch.
The instance diamond in `compatible_smul` doesn't matter because it's in `Prop`.
-/
instance CompatibleSMul.int : CompatibleSMul R ℤ M N :=
⟨fun r m n =>
Int.induction_on r (by simp) (fun r ih => by simpa [add_smul, tmul_add, add_tmul] using ih)
fun r ih => by simpa [sub_smul, tmul_sub, sub_tmul] using ih⟩
instance CompatibleSMul.unit {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [DistribMulAction S N]
[CompatibleSMul R S M N] : CompatibleSMul R Sˣ M N :=
| ⟨fun s m n => CompatibleSMul.smul_tmul (s : S) m n⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 1,322 | 1,323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
|
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 270 | 274 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.IsLocalHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic
/-!
# Covering Maps
This file defines covering maps.
## Main definitions
* `IsEvenlyCovered f x I`: A point `x` is evenly covered by `f : E → X` with fiber `I` if `I` is
discrete and there is a `Trivialization` of `f` at `x` with fiber `I`.
* `IsCoveringMap f`: A function `f : E → X` is a covering map if every point `x` is evenly
covered by `f` with fiber `f ⁻¹' {x}`. The fibers `f ⁻¹' {x}` must be discrete, but if `X` is
not connected, then the fibers `f ⁻¹' {x}` are not necessarily isomorphic. Also, `f` is not
assumed to be surjective, so the fibers are even allowed to be empty.
-/
open Bundle Topology
variable {E X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace X] (f : E → X) (s : Set X)
/-- A point `x : X` is evenly covered by `f : E → X` if `x` has an evenly covered neighborhood. -/
def IsEvenlyCovered (x : X) (I : Type*) [TopologicalSpace I] :=
DiscreteTopology I ∧ ∃ t : Trivialization I f, x ∈ t.baseSet
namespace IsEvenlyCovered
variable {f}
/-- If `x` is evenly covered by `f`, then we can construct a trivialization of `f` at `x`. -/
noncomputable def toTrivialization {x : X} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f x I) : Trivialization (f ⁻¹' {x}) f :=
(Classical.choose h.2).transFiberHomeomorph
((Classical.choose h.2).preimageSingletonHomeomorph (Classical.choose_spec h.2)).symm
theorem mem_toTrivialization_baseSet {x : X} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f x I) : x ∈ h.toTrivialization.baseSet :=
Classical.choose_spec h.2
theorem toTrivialization_apply {x : E} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f (f x) I) : (h.toTrivialization x).2 = ⟨x, rfl⟩ :=
let e := Classical.choose h.2
let h := Classical.choose_spec h.2
let he := e.mk_proj_snd' h
Subtype.ext
((e.toPartialEquiv.eq_symm_apply (e.mem_source.mpr h)
(by rwa [he, e.mem_target, e.coe_fst (e.mem_source.mpr h)])).mpr
he.symm).symm
protected theorem continuousAt {x : E} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f (f x) I) : ContinuousAt f x :=
let e := h.toTrivialization
e.continuousAt_proj (e.mem_source.mpr (mem_toTrivialization_baseSet h))
theorem to_isEvenlyCovered_preimage {x : X} {I : Type*} [TopologicalSpace I]
(h : IsEvenlyCovered f x I) : IsEvenlyCovered f x (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
let ⟨_, h2⟩ := h
⟨((Classical.choose h2).preimageSingletonHomeomorph
(Classical.choose_spec h2)).isEmbedding.discreteTopology,
_, h.mem_toTrivialization_baseSet⟩
end IsEvenlyCovered
/-- A covering map is a continuous function `f : E → X` with discrete fibers such that each point
of `X` has an evenly covered neighborhood. -/
def IsCoveringMapOn :=
∀ x ∈ s, IsEvenlyCovered f x (f ⁻¹' {x})
namespace IsCoveringMapOn
theorem mk (F : X → Type*) [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (F x)] [hF : ∀ x, DiscreteTopology (F x)]
(e : ∀ x ∈ s, Trivialization (F x) f) (h : ∀ (x : X) (hx : x ∈ s), x ∈ (e x hx).baseSet) :
IsCoveringMapOn f s := fun x hx =>
IsEvenlyCovered.to_isEvenlyCovered_preimage ⟨hF x, e x hx, h x hx⟩
variable {f} {s}
protected theorem continuousAt (hf : IsCoveringMapOn f s) {x : E} (hx : f x ∈ s) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
(hf (f x) hx).continuousAt
protected theorem continuousOn (hf : IsCoveringMapOn f s) : ContinuousOn f (f ⁻¹' s) :=
continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun _ => hf.continuousAt
protected theorem isLocalHomeomorphOn (hf : IsCoveringMapOn f s) :
IsLocalHomeomorphOn f (f ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsLocalHomeomorphOn.mk f (f ⁻¹' s) fun x hx => ?_
let e := (hf (f x) hx).toTrivialization
have h := (hf (f x) hx).mem_toTrivialization_baseSet
let he := e.mem_source.2 h
refine
⟨e.toPartialHomeomorph.trans
{ toFun := fun p => p.1
invFun := fun p => ⟨p, x, rfl⟩
source := e.baseSet ×ˢ ({⟨x, rfl⟩} : Set (f ⁻¹' {f x}))
target := e.baseSet
open_source :=
e.open_baseSet.prod (singletons_open_iff_discrete.2 (hf (f x) hx).1 ⟨x, rfl⟩)
open_target := e.open_baseSet
map_source' := fun p => And.left
map_target' := fun p hp => ⟨hp, rfl⟩
left_inv' := fun p hp => Prod.ext rfl hp.2.symm
right_inv' := fun p _ => rfl
continuousOn_toFun := continuousOn_fst
continuousOn_invFun := by fun_prop },
⟨he, by rwa [e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm_symm, e.proj_toFun x he],
(hf (f x) hx).toTrivialization_apply⟩,
fun p h => (e.proj_toFun p h.1).symm⟩
end IsCoveringMapOn
/-- A covering map is a continuous function `f : E → X` with discrete fibers such that each point
of `X` has an evenly covered neighborhood. -/
def IsCoveringMap :=
∀ x, IsEvenlyCovered f x (f ⁻¹' {x})
variable {f}
theorem isCoveringMap_iff_isCoveringMapOn_univ : IsCoveringMap f ↔ IsCoveringMapOn f Set.univ := by
simp only [IsCoveringMap, IsCoveringMapOn, Set.mem_univ, forall_true_left]
protected theorem IsCoveringMap.isCoveringMapOn (hf : IsCoveringMap f) :
IsCoveringMapOn f Set.univ :=
isCoveringMap_iff_isCoveringMapOn_univ.mp hf
variable (f)
namespace IsCoveringMap
theorem mk (F : X → Type*) [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (F x)] [∀ x, DiscreteTopology (F x)]
(e : ∀ x, Trivialization (F x) f) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ (e x).baseSet) : IsCoveringMap f :=
isCoveringMap_iff_isCoveringMapOn_univ.mpr
(IsCoveringMapOn.mk f Set.univ F (fun x _ => e x) fun x _ => h x)
variable {f}
variable (hf : IsCoveringMap f)
include hf
protected theorem continuous : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.mpr hf.isCoveringMapOn.continuousOn
protected theorem isLocalHomeomorph : IsLocalHomeomorph f :=
isLocalHomeomorph_iff_isLocalHomeomorphOn_univ.mpr hf.isCoveringMapOn.isLocalHomeomorphOn
protected theorem isOpenMap : IsOpenMap f :=
hf.isLocalHomeomorph.isOpenMap
theorem isQuotientMap (hf' : Function.Surjective f) : IsQuotientMap f :=
hf.isOpenMap.isQuotientMap hf.continuous hf'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias quotientMap := isQuotientMap
protected theorem isSeparatedMap : IsSeparatedMap f :=
fun e₁ e₂ he hne ↦ by
obtain ⟨_, t, he₁⟩ := hf (f e₁)
have he₂ := he₁; simp_rw [he] at he₂; rw [← t.mem_source] at he₁ he₂
refine ⟨t.source ∩ (Prod.snd ∘ t) ⁻¹' {(t e₁).2}, t.source ∩ (Prod.snd ∘ t) ⁻¹' {(t e₂).2},
?_, ?_, ⟨he₁, rfl⟩, ⟨he₂, rfl⟩, Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ hne (t.injOn he₁ he₂ ?_)⟩
iterate 2
exact t.continuousOn_toFun.isOpen_inter_preimage t.open_source
(continuous_snd.isOpen_preimage _ <| isOpen_discrete _)
refine Prod.ext ?_ (h₁.2.symm.trans h₂.2)
rwa [t.proj_toFun e₁ he₁, t.proj_toFun e₂ he₂]
variable {A} [TopologicalSpace A] {s : Set A} {g g₁ g₂ : A → E}
theorem eq_of_comp_eq [PreconnectedSpace A] (h₁ : Continuous g₁) (h₂ : Continuous g₂)
(he : f ∘ g₁ = f ∘ g₂) (a : A) (ha : g₁ a = g₂ a) : g₁ = g₂ :=
hf.isSeparatedMap.eq_of_comp_eq hf.isLocalHomeomorph.isLocallyInjective h₁ h₂ he a ha
| theorem const_of_comp [PreconnectedSpace A] (cont : Continuous g)
(he : ∀ a a', f (g a) = f (g a')) (a a') : g a = g a' :=
hf.isSeparatedMap.const_of_comp hf.isLocalHomeomorph.isLocallyInjective cont he a a'
theorem eqOn_of_comp_eqOn (hs : IsPreconnected s) (h₁ : ContinuousOn g₁ s) (h₂ : ContinuousOn g₂ s)
(he : s.EqOn (f ∘ g₁) (f ∘ g₂)) {a : A} (has : a ∈ s) (ha : g₁ a = g₂ a) : s.EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
hf.isSeparatedMap.eqOn_of_comp_eqOn hf.isLocalHomeomorph.isLocallyInjective hs h₁ h₂ he has ha
theorem constOn_of_comp (hs : IsPreconnected s) (cont : ContinuousOn g s)
(he : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ a' ∈ s, f (g a) = f (g a'))
{a a'} (ha : a ∈ s) (ha' : a' ∈ s) : g a = g a' :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Covering.lean | 178 | 188 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Init
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Semigroup
import Mathlib.Topology.StoneCech
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Hindman's theorem on finite sums
We prove Hindman's theorem on finite sums, using idempotent ultrafilters.
Given an infinite sequence `a₀, a₁, a₂, …` of positive integers, the set `FS(a₀, …)` is the set
of positive integers that can be expressed as a finite sum of `aᵢ`'s, without repetition. Hindman's
theorem asserts that whenever the positive integers are finitely colored, there exists a sequence
`a₀, a₁, a₂, …` such that `FS(a₀, …)` is monochromatic. There is also a stronger version, saying
that whenever a set of the form `FS(a₀, …)` is finitely colored, there exists a sequence
`b₀, b₁, b₂, …` such that `FS(b₀, …)` is monochromatic and contained in `FS(a₀, …)`. We prove both
these versions for a general semigroup `M` instead of `ℕ+` since it is no harder, although this
special case implies the general case.
The idea of the proof is to extend the addition `(+) : M → M → M` to addition `(+) : βM → βM → βM`
on the space `βM` of ultrafilters on `M`. One can prove that if `U` is an _idempotent_ ultrafilter,
i.e. `U + U = U`, then any `U`-large subset of `M` contains some set `FS(a₀, …)` (see
`exists_FS_of_large`). And with the help of a general topological argument one can show that any set
of the form `FS(a₀, …)` is `U`-large according to some idempotent ultrafilter `U` (see
`exists_idempotent_ultrafilter_le_FS`). This is enough to prove the theorem since in any finite
partition of a `U`-large set, one of the parts is `U`-large.
## Main results
- `FS_partition_regular`: the strong form of Hindman's theorem
- `exists_FS_of_finite_cover`: the weak form of Hindman's theorem
## Tags
Ramsey theory, ultrafilter
-/
open Filter
/-- Multiplication of ultrafilters given by `∀ᶠ m in U*V, p m ↔ ∀ᶠ m in U, ∀ᶠ m' in V, p (m*m')`. -/
@[to_additive
"Addition of ultrafilters given by `∀ᶠ m in U+V, p m ↔ ∀ᶠ m in U, ∀ᶠ m' in V, p (m+m')`."]
def Ultrafilter.mul {M} [Mul M] : Mul (Ultrafilter M) where mul U V := (· * ·) <$> U <*> V
attribute [local instance] Ultrafilter.mul Ultrafilter.add
/- We could have taken this as the definition of `U * V`, but then we would have to prove that it
defines an ultrafilter. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem Ultrafilter.eventually_mul {M} [Mul M] (U V : Ultrafilter M) (p : M → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ m in ↑(U * V), p m) ↔ ∀ᶠ m in U, ∀ᶠ m' in V, p (m * m') :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Semigroup structure on `Ultrafilter M` induced by a semigroup structure on `M`. -/
@[to_additive
"Additive semigroup structure on `Ultrafilter M` induced by an additive semigroup
structure on `M`."]
def Ultrafilter.semigroup {M} [Semigroup M] : Semigroup (Ultrafilter M) :=
{ Ultrafilter.mul with
mul_assoc := fun U V W =>
Ultrafilter.coe_inj.mp <|
Filter.ext' fun p => by simp [Ultrafilter.eventually_mul, mul_assoc] }
attribute [local instance] Ultrafilter.semigroup Ultrafilter.addSemigroup
-- We don't prove `continuous_mul_right`, because in general it is false!
@[to_additive]
theorem Ultrafilter.continuous_mul_left {M} [Mul M] (V : Ultrafilter M) :
Continuous (· * V) :=
ultrafilterBasis_is_basis.continuous_iff.2 <| Set.forall_mem_range.mpr fun s ↦
ultrafilter_isOpen_basic { m : M | ∀ᶠ m' in V, m * m' ∈ s }
namespace Hindman
/-- `FS a` is the set of finite sums in `a`, i.e. `m ∈ FS a` if `m` is the sum of a nonempty
subsequence of `a`. We give a direct inductive definition instead of talking about subsequences. -/
inductive FS {M} [AddSemigroup M] : Stream' M → Set M
| head (a : Stream' M) : FS a a.head
| tail (a : Stream' M) (m : M) (h : FS a.tail m) : FS a m
| cons (a : Stream' M) (m : M) (h : FS a.tail m) : FS a (a.head + m)
/-- `FP a` is the set of finite products in `a`, i.e. `m ∈ FP a` if `m` is the product of a nonempty
subsequence of `a`. We give a direct inductive definition instead of talking about subsequences. -/
@[to_additive FS]
inductive FP {M} [Semigroup M] : Stream' M → Set M
| head (a : Stream' M) : FP a a.head
| tail (a : Stream' M) (m : M) (h : FP a.tail m) : FP a m
| cons (a : Stream' M) (m : M) (h : FP a.tail m) : FP a (a.head * m)
/-- If `m` and `m'` are finite products in `M`, then so is `m * m'`, provided that `m'` is obtained
from a subsequence of `M` starting sufficiently late. -/
@[to_additive
"If `m` and `m'` are finite sums in `M`, then so is `m + m'`, provided that `m'`
is obtained from a subsequence of `M` starting sufficiently late."]
theorem FP.mul {M} [Semigroup M] {a : Stream' M} {m : M} (hm : m ∈ FP a) :
∃ n, ∀ m' ∈ FP (a.drop n), m * m' ∈ FP a := by
induction hm with
| head a => exact ⟨1, fun m hm => FP.cons a m hm⟩
| tail a m _ ih =>
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := ih
use n + 1
intro m' hm'
exact FP.tail _ _ (hn _ hm')
| cons a m _ ih =>
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := ih
use n + 1
intro m' hm'
rw [mul_assoc]
exact FP.cons _ _ (hn _ hm')
@[to_additive exists_idempotent_ultrafilter_le_FS]
theorem exists_idempotent_ultrafilter_le_FP {M} [Semigroup M] (a : Stream' M) :
∃ U : Ultrafilter M, U * U = U ∧ ∀ᶠ m in U, m ∈ FP a := by
let S : Set (Ultrafilter M) := ⋂ n, { U | ∀ᶠ m in U, m ∈ FP (a.drop n) }
have h := exists_idempotent_in_compact_subsemigroup ?_ S ?_ ?_ ?_
· rcases h with ⟨U, hU, U_idem⟩
refine ⟨U, U_idem, ?_⟩
convert Set.mem_iInter.mp hU 0
· exact Ultrafilter.continuous_mul_left
· apply IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
· intro n U hU
filter_upwards [hU]
rw [← Stream'.drop_drop, ← Stream'.tail_eq_drop]
exact FP.tail _
· intro n
exact ⟨pure _, mem_pure.mpr <| FP.head _⟩
· exact (ultrafilter_isClosed_basic _).isCompact
· intro n
apply ultrafilter_isClosed_basic
· exact IsClosed.isCompact (isClosed_iInter fun i => ultrafilter_isClosed_basic _)
| · intro U hU V hV
rw [Set.mem_iInter] at *
intro n
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ultrafilter.eventually_mul]
filter_upwards [hU n] with m hm
obtain ⟨n', hn⟩ := FP.mul hm
filter_upwards [hV (n' + n)] with m' hm'
apply hn
simpa only [Stream'.drop_drop, add_comm] using hm'
@[to_additive exists_FS_of_large]
theorem exists_FP_of_large {M} [Semigroup M] (U : Ultrafilter M) (U_idem : U * U = U) (s₀ : Set M)
(sU : s₀ ∈ U) : ∃ a, FP a ⊆ s₀ := by
/- Informally: given a `U`-large set `s₀`, the set `s₀ ∩ { m | ∀ᶠ m' in U, m * m' ∈ s₀ }` is also
`U`-large (since `U` is idempotent). Thus in particular there is an `a₀` in this intersection. Now
let `s₁` be the intersection `s₀ ∩ { m | a₀ * m ∈ s₀ }`. By choice of `a₀`, this is again
`U`-large, so we can repeat the argument starting from `s₁`, obtaining `a₁`, `s₂`, etc.
This gives the desired infinite sequence. -/
have exists_elem : ∀ {s : Set M} (_hs : s ∈ U), (s ∩ { m | ∀ᶠ m' in U, m * m' ∈ s }).Nonempty :=
fun {s} hs => Ultrafilter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hs <| by rwa [← U_idem] at hs)
let elem : { s // s ∈ U } → M := fun p => (exists_elem p.property).some
let succ : {s // s ∈ U} → {s // s ∈ U} := fun (p : {s // s ∈ U}) =>
⟨p.val ∩ {m : M | elem p * m ∈ p.val},
inter_mem p.property
(show (exists_elem p.property).some ∈ {m : M | ∀ᶠ (m' : M) in ↑U, m * m' ∈ p.val} from
p.val.inter_subset_right (exists_elem p.property).some_mem)⟩
use Stream'.corec elem succ (Subtype.mk s₀ sU)
suffices ∀ (a : Stream' M), ∀ m ∈ FP a, ∀ p, a = Stream'.corec elem succ p → m ∈ p.val by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Hindman.lean | 138 | 165 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Filippo A. E. Nuccio. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Filippo A. E. Nuccio, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Associator
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
/-!
# Kronecker product of matrices
This defines the [Kronecker product](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronecker_product).
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.kroneckerMap`: A generalization of the Kronecker product: given a map `f : α → β → γ`
and matrices `A` and `B` with coefficients in `α` and `β`, respectively, it is defined as the
matrix with coefficients in `γ` such that
`kroneckerMap f A B (i₁, i₂) (j₁, j₂) = f (A i₁ j₁) (B i₁ j₂)`.
* `Matrix.kroneckerMapBilinear`: when `f` is bilinear, so is `kroneckerMap f`.
## Specializations
* `Matrix.kronecker`: An alias of `kroneckerMap (*)`. Prefer using the notation.
* `Matrix.kroneckerBilinear`: `Matrix.kronecker` is bilinear
* `Matrix.kroneckerTMul`: An alias of `kroneckerMap (⊗ₜ)`. Prefer using the notation.
* `Matrix.kroneckerTMulBilinear`: `Matrix.kroneckerTMul` is bilinear
## Notations
These require `open Kronecker`:
* `A ⊗ₖ B` for `kroneckerMap (*) A B`. Lemmas about this notation use the token `kronecker`.
* `A ⊗ₖₜ B` and `A ⊗ₖₜ[R] B` for `kroneckerMap (⊗ₜ) A B`.
Lemmas about this notation use the token `kroneckerTMul`.
-/
namespace Matrix
open scoped RightActions
variable {R α α' β β' γ γ' : Type*}
variable {l m n p : Type*} {q r : Type*} {l' m' n' p' : Type*}
section KroneckerMap
/-- Produce a matrix with `f` applied to every pair of elements from `A` and `B`. -/
def kroneckerMap (f : α → β → γ) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) : Matrix (l × n) (m × p) γ :=
of fun (i : l × n) (j : m × p) => f (A i.1 j.1) (B i.2 j.2)
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `kroneckerMap`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem kroneckerMap_apply (f : α → β → γ) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) (i j) :
kroneckerMap f A B i j = f (A i.1 j.1) (B i.2 j.2) :=
rfl
theorem kroneckerMap_transpose (f : α → β → γ) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f Aᵀ Bᵀ = (kroneckerMap f A B)ᵀ :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem kroneckerMap_map_left (f : α' → β → γ) (g : α → α') (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f (A.map g) B = kroneckerMap (fun a b => f (g a) b) A B :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem kroneckerMap_map_right (f : α → β' → γ) (g : β → β') (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f A (B.map g) = kroneckerMap (fun a b => f a (g b)) A B :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem kroneckerMap_map (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → γ') (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
(kroneckerMap f A B).map g = kroneckerMap (fun a b => g (f a b)) A B :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem kroneckerMap_zero_left [Zero α] [Zero γ] (f : α → β → γ) (hf : ∀ b, f 0 b = 0)
(B : Matrix n p β) : kroneckerMap f (0 : Matrix l m α) B = 0 :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _
@[simp]
theorem kroneckerMap_zero_right [Zero β] [Zero γ] (f : α → β → γ) (hf : ∀ a, f a 0 = 0)
(A : Matrix l m α) : kroneckerMap f A (0 : Matrix n p β) = 0 :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _
theorem kroneckerMap_add_left [Add α] [Add γ] (f : α → β → γ)
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂ b, f (a₁ + a₂) b = f a₁ b + f a₂ b) (A₁ A₂ : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f (A₁ + A₂) B = kroneckerMap f A₁ B + kroneckerMap f A₂ B :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_add_right [Add β] [Add γ] (f : α → β → γ)
(hf : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) (A : Matrix l m α) (B₁ B₂ : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f A (B₁ + B₂) = kroneckerMap f A B₁ + kroneckerMap f A B₂ :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_smul_left [SMul R α] [SMul R γ] (f : α → β → γ) (r : R)
(hf : ∀ a b, f (r • a) b = r • f a b) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f (r • A) B = r • kroneckerMap f A B :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_smul_right [SMul R β] [SMul R γ] (f : α → β → γ) (r : R)
(hf : ∀ a b, f a (r • b) = r • f a b) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f A (r • B) = r • kroneckerMap f A B :=
ext fun _ _ => hf _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_stdBasisMatrix_stdBasisMatrix
[Zero α] [Zero β] [Zero γ] [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p]
(i₁ : l) (j₁ : m) (i₂ : n) (j₂ : p)
(f : α → β → γ) (hf₁ : ∀ b, f 0 b = 0) (hf₂ : ∀ a, f a 0 = 0) (a : α) (b : β) :
kroneckerMap f (stdBasisMatrix i₁ j₁ a) (stdBasisMatrix i₂ j₂ b) =
stdBasisMatrix (i₁, i₂) (j₁, j₂) (f a b) := by
ext ⟨i₁', i₂'⟩ ⟨j₁', j₂'⟩
dsimp [stdBasisMatrix]
aesop
theorem kroneckerMap_diagonal_diagonal [Zero α] [Zero β] [Zero γ] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
(f : α → β → γ) (hf₁ : ∀ b, f 0 b = 0) (hf₂ : ∀ a, f a 0 = 0) (a : m → α) (b : n → β) :
kroneckerMap f (diagonal a) (diagonal b) = diagonal fun mn => f (a mn.1) (b mn.2) := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ ⟨j₁, j₂⟩
simp [diagonal, apply_ite f, ite_and, ite_apply, apply_ite (f (a i₁)), hf₁, hf₂]
theorem kroneckerMap_diagonal_right [Zero β] [Zero γ] [DecidableEq n] (f : α → β → γ)
(hf : ∀ a, f a 0 = 0) (A : Matrix l m α) (b : n → β) :
kroneckerMap f A (diagonal b) = blockDiagonal fun i => A.map fun a => f a (b i) := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ ⟨j₁, j₂⟩
simp [diagonal, blockDiagonal, apply_ite (f (A i₁ j₁)), hf]
theorem kroneckerMap_diagonal_left [Zero α] [Zero γ] [DecidableEq l] (f : α → β → γ)
(hf : ∀ b, f 0 b = 0) (a : l → α) (B : Matrix m n β) :
kroneckerMap f (diagonal a) B =
Matrix.reindex (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _)
(blockDiagonal fun i => B.map fun b => f (a i) b) := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ ⟨j₁, j₂⟩
simp [diagonal, blockDiagonal, apply_ite f, ite_apply, hf]
@[simp]
theorem kroneckerMap_one_one [Zero α] [Zero β] [Zero γ] [One α] [One β] [One γ] [DecidableEq m]
[DecidableEq n] (f : α → β → γ) (hf₁ : ∀ b, f 0 b = 0) (hf₂ : ∀ a, f a 0 = 0)
(hf₃ : f 1 1 = 1) : kroneckerMap f (1 : Matrix m m α) (1 : Matrix n n β) = 1 :=
(kroneckerMap_diagonal_diagonal _ hf₁ hf₂ _ _).trans <| by simp only [hf₃, diagonal_one]
theorem kroneckerMap_reindex (f : α → β → γ) (el : l ≃ l') (em : m ≃ m') (en : n ≃ n') (ep : p ≃ p')
(M : Matrix l m α) (N : Matrix n p β) :
kroneckerMap f (reindex el em M) (reindex en ep N) =
reindex (el.prodCongr en) (em.prodCongr ep) (kroneckerMap f M N) := by
ext ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩
rfl
theorem kroneckerMap_reindex_left (f : α → β → γ) (el : l ≃ l') (em : m ≃ m') (M : Matrix l m α)
(N : Matrix n n' β) :
kroneckerMap f (Matrix.reindex el em M) N =
reindex (el.prodCongr (Equiv.refl _)) (em.prodCongr (Equiv.refl _)) (kroneckerMap f M N) :=
kroneckerMap_reindex _ _ _ (Equiv.refl _) (Equiv.refl _) _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_reindex_right (f : α → β → γ) (em : m ≃ m') (en : n ≃ n') (M : Matrix l l' α)
(N : Matrix m n β) :
kroneckerMap f M (reindex em en N) =
reindex ((Equiv.refl _).prodCongr em) ((Equiv.refl _).prodCongr en) (kroneckerMap f M N) :=
kroneckerMap_reindex _ (Equiv.refl _) (Equiv.refl _) _ _ _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_assoc {δ ξ ω ω' : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ → ω) (f' : α → ξ → ω')
(g' : β → δ → ξ) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) (D : Matrix q r δ) (φ : ω ≃ ω')
(hφ : ∀ a b d, φ (g (f a b) d) = f' a (g' b d)) :
(reindex (Equiv.prodAssoc l n q) (Equiv.prodAssoc m p r)).trans (Equiv.mapMatrix φ)
(kroneckerMap g (kroneckerMap f A B) D) =
kroneckerMap f' A (kroneckerMap g' B D) :=
ext fun _ _ => hφ _ _ _
theorem kroneckerMap_assoc₁ {δ ξ ω : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ → ω) (f' : α → ξ → ω)
(g' : β → δ → ξ) (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p β) (D : Matrix q r δ)
(h : ∀ a b d, g (f a b) d = f' a (g' b d)) :
reindex (Equiv.prodAssoc l n q) (Equiv.prodAssoc m p r)
(kroneckerMap g (kroneckerMap f A B) D) =
kroneckerMap f' A (kroneckerMap g' B D) :=
ext fun _ _ => h _ _ _
/-- When `f` is bilinear then `Matrix.kroneckerMap f` is also bilinear. -/
@[simps!]
def kroneckerMapBilinear [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
[Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ] (f : α →ₗ[R] β →ₗ[R] γ) :
Matrix l m α →ₗ[R] Matrix n p β →ₗ[R] Matrix (l × n) (m × p) γ :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (kroneckerMap fun r s => f r s) (kroneckerMap_add_left _ <| f.map_add₂)
(fun _ => kroneckerMap_smul_left _ _ <| f.map_smul₂ _)
(kroneckerMap_add_right _ fun a => (f a).map_add) fun r =>
kroneckerMap_smul_right _ _ fun a => (f a).map_smul r
/-- `Matrix.kroneckerMapBilinear` commutes with `*` if `f` does.
This is primarily used with `R = ℕ` to prove `Matrix.mul_kronecker_mul`. -/
theorem kroneckerMapBilinear_mul_mul [CommSemiring R] [Fintype m] [Fintype m']
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring β] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring γ]
[Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ] (f : α →ₗ[R] β →ₗ[R] γ)
(h_comm : ∀ a b a' b', f (a * b) (a' * b') = f a a' * f b b') (A : Matrix l m α)
(B : Matrix m n α) (A' : Matrix l' m' β) (B' : Matrix m' n' β) :
kroneckerMapBilinear f (A * B) (A' * B') =
kroneckerMapBilinear f A A' * kroneckerMapBilinear f B B' := by
ext ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩
simp only [kroneckerMapBilinear_apply_apply, mul_apply, ← Finset.univ_product_univ,
Finset.sum_product, kroneckerMap_apply]
simp_rw [map_sum f, LinearMap.sum_apply, map_sum, h_comm]
/-- `trace` distributes over `Matrix.kroneckerMapBilinear`.
This is primarily used with `R = ℕ` to prove `Matrix.trace_kronecker`. -/
theorem trace_kroneckerMapBilinear [CommSemiring R] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [AddCommMonoid α]
[AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ] [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
(f : α →ₗ[R] β →ₗ[R] γ) (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix n n β) :
trace (kroneckerMapBilinear f A B) = f (trace A) (trace B) := by
simp_rw [Matrix.trace, Matrix.diag, kroneckerMapBilinear_apply_apply, LinearMap.map_sum₂,
map_sum, ← Finset.univ_product_univ, Finset.sum_product, kroneckerMap_apply]
/-- `determinant` of `Matrix.kroneckerMapBilinear`.
This is primarily used with `R = ℕ` to prove `Matrix.det_kronecker`. -/
theorem det_kroneckerMapBilinear [CommSemiring R] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m]
[DecidableEq n] [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [CommRing γ] [Module R α] [Module R β]
[Module R γ]
(f : α →ₗ[R] β →ₗ[R] γ) (h_comm : ∀ a b a' b', f (a * b) (a' * b') = f a a' * f b b')
(A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix n n β) :
det (kroneckerMapBilinear f A B) =
det (A.map fun a => f a 1) ^ Fintype.card n * det (B.map fun b => f 1 b) ^ Fintype.card m :=
calc
det (kroneckerMapBilinear f A B) =
det (kroneckerMapBilinear f A 1 * kroneckerMapBilinear f 1 B) := by
rw [← kroneckerMapBilinear_mul_mul f h_comm, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.one_mul]
_ = det (blockDiagonal fun (_ : n) => A.map fun a => f a 1) *
det (blockDiagonal fun (_ : m) => B.map fun b => f 1 b) := by
rw [det_mul, ← diagonal_one, ← diagonal_one, kroneckerMapBilinear_apply_apply,
kroneckerMap_diagonal_right _ fun _ => _, kroneckerMapBilinear_apply_apply,
kroneckerMap_diagonal_left _ fun _ => _, det_reindex_self]
· intro; exact LinearMap.map_zero₂ _ _
· intro; exact map_zero _
_ = _ := by simp_rw [det_blockDiagonal, Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ]
end KroneckerMap
/-! ### Specialization to `Matrix.kroneckerMap (*)` -/
section Kronecker
open Matrix
/-- The Kronecker product. This is just a shorthand for `kroneckerMap (*)`. Prefer the notation
`⊗ₖ` rather than this definition. -/
@[simp]
def kronecker [Mul α] : Matrix l m α → Matrix n p α → Matrix (l × n) (m × p) α :=
kroneckerMap (· * ·)
@[inherit_doc Matrix.kroneckerMap]
scoped[Kronecker] infixl:100 " ⊗ₖ " => Matrix.kroneckerMap (· * ·)
open Kronecker
@[simp]
theorem kronecker_apply [Mul α] (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p α) (i₁ i₂ j₁ j₂) :
(A ⊗ₖ B) (i₁, i₂) (j₁, j₂) = A i₁ j₁ * B i₂ j₂ :=
rfl
/-- `Matrix.kronecker` as a bilinear map. -/
def kroneckerBilinear [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix l m α →ₗ[R] Matrix n p α →ₗ[R] Matrix (l × n) (m × p) α :=
kroneckerMapBilinear (Algebra.lmul R α)
/-! What follows is a copy, in order, of every `Matrix.kroneckerMap` lemma above that has
hypotheses which can be filled by properties of `*`. -/
theorem zero_kronecker [MulZeroClass α] (B : Matrix n p α) : (0 : Matrix l m α) ⊗ₖ B = 0 :=
kroneckerMap_zero_left _ zero_mul B
theorem kronecker_zero [MulZeroClass α] (A : Matrix l m α) : A ⊗ₖ (0 : Matrix n p α) = 0 :=
kroneckerMap_zero_right _ mul_zero A
theorem add_kronecker [Distrib α] (A₁ A₂ : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p α) :
(A₁ + A₂) ⊗ₖ B = A₁ ⊗ₖ B + A₂ ⊗ₖ B :=
kroneckerMap_add_left _ add_mul _ _ _
theorem kronecker_add [Distrib α] (A : Matrix l m α) (B₁ B₂ : Matrix n p α) :
A ⊗ₖ (B₁ + B₂) = A ⊗ₖ B₁ + A ⊗ₖ B₂ :=
kroneckerMap_add_right _ mul_add _ _ _
theorem smul_kronecker [Mul α] [SMul R α] [IsScalarTower R α α] (r : R)
(A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p α) : (r • A) ⊗ₖ B = r • A ⊗ₖ B :=
kroneckerMap_smul_left _ _ (fun _ _ => smul_mul_assoc _ _ _) _ _
theorem kronecker_smul [Mul α] [SMul R α] [SMulCommClass R α α] (r : R)
(A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix n p α) : A ⊗ₖ (r • B) = r • A ⊗ₖ B :=
kroneckerMap_smul_right _ _ (fun _ _ => mul_smul_comm _ _ _) _ _
theorem stdBasisMatrix_kronecker_stdBasisMatrix
[MulZeroClass α] [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p]
(ia : l) (ja : m) (ib : n) (jb : p) (a b : α) :
stdBasisMatrix ia ja a ⊗ₖ stdBasisMatrix ib jb b = stdBasisMatrix (ia, ib) (ja, jb) (a * b) :=
kroneckerMap_stdBasisMatrix_stdBasisMatrix _ _ _ _ _ zero_mul mul_zero _ _
theorem diagonal_kronecker_diagonal [MulZeroClass α] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] (a : m → α)
(b : n → α) : diagonal a ⊗ₖ diagonal b = diagonal fun mn => a mn.1 * b mn.2 :=
kroneckerMap_diagonal_diagonal _ zero_mul mul_zero _ _
theorem kronecker_diagonal [MulZeroClass α] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix l m α) (b : n → α) :
A ⊗ₖ diagonal b = blockDiagonal fun i => A <• b i :=
kroneckerMap_diagonal_right _ mul_zero _ _
theorem diagonal_kronecker [MulZeroClass α] [DecidableEq l] (a : l → α) (B : Matrix m n α) :
diagonal a ⊗ₖ B =
Matrix.reindex (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (blockDiagonal fun i => a i • B) :=
kroneckerMap_diagonal_left _ zero_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem natCast_kronecker_natCast [NonAssocSemiring α] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] (a b : ℕ) :
(a : Matrix m m α) ⊗ₖ (b : Matrix n n α) = ↑(a * b) :=
(diagonal_kronecker_diagonal _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; rfl
theorem kronecker_natCast [NonAssocSemiring α] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix l m α) (b : ℕ) :
A ⊗ₖ (b : Matrix n n α) = blockDiagonal fun _ => b • A :=
kronecker_diagonal _ _ |>.trans <| by
congr! 2
ext
simp [(Nat.cast_commute b _).eq]
theorem natCast_kronecker [NonAssocSemiring α] [DecidableEq l] (a : ℕ) (B : Matrix m n α) :
(a : Matrix l l α) ⊗ₖ B =
Matrix.reindex (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (blockDiagonal fun _ => a • B) :=
diagonal_kronecker _ _ |>.trans <| by
congr! 2
ext
simp [(Nat.cast_commute a _).eq]
theorem kronecker_ofNat [NonAssocSemiring α] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix l m α) (b : ℕ)
[b.AtLeastTwo] : A ⊗ₖ (ofNat(b) : Matrix n n α) =
blockDiagonal fun _ => A <• (ofNat(b) : α) :=
kronecker_diagonal _ _
| theorem ofNat_kronecker [NonAssocSemiring α] [DecidableEq l] (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo]
(B : Matrix m n α) : (ofNat(a) : Matrix l l α) ⊗ₖ B =
Matrix.reindex (.prodComm _ _) (.prodComm _ _)
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Kronecker.lean | 339 | 341 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
lemma disjoint_edgeFinset : Disjoint G₁.edgeFinset G₂.edgeFinset ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.disjoint_coe, coe_edgeFinset, disjoint_edgeSet]
lemma edgeFinset_eq_empty : G.edgeFinset = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by
rw [← edgeFinset_bot, edgeFinset_inj]
lemma edgeFinset_nonempty : G.edgeFinset.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeFinset_eq_empty.ne]
theorem edgeFinset_card : #G.edgeFinset = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : #(univ : Finset G.edgeSet) = #G.edgeFinset :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ({e | ¬e.IsDiag} : Finset _) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
#(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : #G.edgeFinset ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ := #(G.neighborFinset v)
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : #(G.neighborFinset v) = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
theorem degree_pos_iff_mem_support : 0 < G.degree v ↔ v ∈ G.support := by
rw [G.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj v, mem_support]
theorem degree_eq_zero_iff_not_mem_support : G.degree v = 0 ↔ v ∉ G.support := by
rw [← G.degree_pos_iff_mem_support v, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, not_ne_iff]
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] : #(G.incidenceFinset v) = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = {e ∈ G.edgeFinset | v ∈ e} := by
ext e
induction e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
variable {G v}
/-- If `G ≤ H` then `G.degree v ≤ H.degree v` for any vertex `v`. -/
lemma degree_le_of_le {H : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype (H.neighborSet v)] (hle : G ≤ H) :
G.degree v ≤ H.degree v := by
simp_rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card fun v hv => hle hv
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
variable {G}
| theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 243 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder
/-!
# Monotonicity on intervals
In this file we prove that a function is (strictly) monotone (or antitone) on a linear order `α`
provided that it is (strictly) monotone on `(-∞, a]` and on `[a, +∞)`. This is a special case
of a more general statement where one deduces monotonicity on a union from monotonicity on each
set.
-/
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {a : α} {f : α → β}
/-- If `f` is strictly monotone both on `s` and `t`, with `s` to the left of `t` and the center
point belonging to both `s` and `t`, then `f` is strictly monotone on `s ∪ t` -/
protected theorem StrictMonoOn.union {s t : Set α} {c : α} (h₁ : StrictMonoOn f s)
(h₂ : StrictMonoOn f t) (hs : IsGreatest s c) (ht : IsLeast t c) : StrictMonoOn f (s ∪ t) := by
have A : ∀ x, x ∈ s ∪ t → x ≤ c → x ∈ s := by
intro x hx hxc
cases hx
· assumption
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxc with (rfl | h'x)
· exact hs.1
exact (lt_irrefl _ (h'x.trans_le (ht.2 (by assumption)))).elim
have B : ∀ x, x ∈ s ∪ t → c ≤ x → x ∈ t := by
intro x hx hxc
match hx with
| Or.inr hx => exact hx
| Or.inl hx =>
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxc with (rfl | h'x)
· exact ht.1
exact (lt_irrefl _ (h'x.trans_le (hs.2 hx))).elim
intro x hx y hy hxy
rcases lt_or_le x c with (hxc | hcx)
· have xs : x ∈ s := A _ hx hxc.le
rcases lt_or_le y c with (hyc | hcy)
· exact h₁ xs (A _ hy hyc.le) hxy
· exact (h₁ xs hs.1 hxc).trans_le (h₂.monotoneOn ht.1 (B _ hy hcy) hcy)
· have xt : x ∈ t := B _ hx hcx
have yt : y ∈ t := B _ hy (hcx.trans hxy.le)
exact h₂ xt yt hxy
/-- If `f` is strictly monotone both on `(-∞, a]` and `[a, ∞)`, then it is strictly monotone on the
whole line. -/
protected theorem StrictMonoOn.Iic_union_Ici (h₁ : StrictMonoOn f (Iic a))
(h₂ : StrictMonoOn f (Ici a)) : StrictMono f := by
rw [← strictMonoOn_univ, ← @Iic_union_Ici _ _ a]
exact StrictMonoOn.union h₁ h₂ isGreatest_Iic isLeast_Ici
/-- If `f` is strictly antitone both on `s` and `t`, with `s` to the left of `t` and the center
point belonging to both `s` and `t`, then `f` is strictly antitone on `s ∪ t` -/
protected theorem StrictAntiOn.union {s t : Set α} {c : α} (h₁ : StrictAntiOn f s)
(h₂ : StrictAntiOn f t) (hs : IsGreatest s c) (ht : IsLeast t c) : StrictAntiOn f (s ∪ t) :=
(h₁.dual_right.union h₂.dual_right hs ht).dual_right
/-- If `f` is strictly antitone both on `(-∞, a]` and `[a, ∞)`, then it is strictly antitone on the
whole line. -/
protected theorem StrictAntiOn.Iic_union_Ici (h₁ : StrictAntiOn f (Iic a))
(h₂ : StrictAntiOn f (Ici a)) : StrictAnti f :=
(h₁.dual_right.Iic_union_Ici h₂.dual_right).dual_right
/-- If `f` is monotone both on `s` and `t`, with `s` to the left of `t` and the center
point belonging to both `s` and `t`, then `f` is monotone on `s ∪ t` -/
protected theorem MonotoneOn.union_right {s t : Set α} {c : α} (h₁ : MonotoneOn f s)
(h₂ : MonotoneOn f t) (hs : IsGreatest s c) (ht : IsLeast t c) : MonotoneOn f (s ∪ t) := by
have A : ∀ x, x ∈ s ∪ t → x ≤ c → x ∈ s := by
intro x hx hxc
cases hx
· assumption
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxc with (rfl | h'x)
· exact hs.1
exact (lt_irrefl _ (h'x.trans_le (ht.2 (by assumption)))).elim
have B : ∀ x, x ∈ s ∪ t → c ≤ x → x ∈ t := by
intro x hx hxc
match hx with
| Or.inr hx => exact hx
| Or.inl hx =>
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxc with (rfl | h'x)
· exact ht.1
exact (lt_irrefl _ (h'x.trans_le (hs.2 hx))).elim
intro x hx y hy hxy
rcases lt_or_le x c with (hxc | hcx)
· have xs : x ∈ s := A _ hx hxc.le
rcases lt_or_le y c with (hyc | hcy)
· exact h₁ xs (A _ hy hyc.le) hxy
· exact (h₁ xs hs.1 hxc.le).trans (h₂ ht.1 (B _ hy hcy) hcy)
· have xt : x ∈ t := B _ hx hcx
have yt : y ∈ t := B _ hy (hcx.trans hxy)
exact h₂ xt yt hxy
/-- If `f` is monotone both on `(-∞, a]` and `[a, ∞)`, then it is monotone on the whole line. -/
protected theorem MonotoneOn.Iic_union_Ici (h₁ : MonotoneOn f (Iic a)) (h₂ : MonotoneOn f (Ici a)) :
Monotone f := by
rw [← monotoneOn_univ, ← @Iic_union_Ici _ _ a]
exact MonotoneOn.union_right h₁ h₂ isGreatest_Iic isLeast_Ici
/-- If `f` is antitone both on `s` and `t`, with `s` to the left of `t` and the center
| point belonging to both `s` and `t`, then `f` is antitone on `s ∪ t` -/
protected theorem AntitoneOn.union_right {s t : Set α} {c : α} (h₁ : AntitoneOn f s)
(h₂ : AntitoneOn f t) (hs : IsGreatest s c) (ht : IsLeast t c) : AntitoneOn f (s ∪ t) :=
(h₁.dual_right.union_right h₂.dual_right hs ht).dual_right
| Mathlib/Order/Monotone/Union.lean | 107 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
/-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
variable [CharZero K]
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338
We name `hcycl` so it can be used as a named argument,
but since https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338, this is considered unused,
so we need to disable the linter. -/
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- The ring of integers of a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance _root_.IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p`-th
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
integralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
integralPowerBasis_gen (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem power_basis_int'_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.dim = φ p := by
rw [integralPowerBasis', integralPowerBasis_dim (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one]),
pow_one]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p ^ k` cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin' hζ.integralPowerBasis (RingOfIntegers.isIntegral _)
(by
simp only [integralPowerBasis_gen, toInteger]
convert Subalgebra.add_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ (⟨ζ - 1, _⟩ : 𝓞 K))
(Subalgebra.one_mem _)
· simp
· exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (by simp)) (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen =
⟨ζ - 1, Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ := by
simp [subOneIntegralPowerBasis]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger - 1 :=
-- The `unusedHavesSuffices` linter incorrectly thinks this `have` is unnecessary.
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `p ≠ 2` and `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ hp.out.one_lt (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
convert Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (PNat.pos _)) hodd
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ (by decide) (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
cases k
· convert Prime.neg Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_neg, map_ofNat]
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one, AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, OneMemClass.coe_one,
pow_zero]
using hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat
(by simp only [zero_add, pow_one, Nat.ofNat_pos]))
convert Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_two Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp))
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) : Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
by_cases htwo : p = 2
· subst htwo
apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow
· apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two htwo
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime' [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
Prime ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
convert zeta_sub_one_prime (k := 0) (by simpa only [zero_add, pow_one])
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime'
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) {s : ℕ} (hs : s ≤ k) (htwo : p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s - 1) = p ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_iff ℤ (Sₘ := K) (Rₘ := ℚ) rfl.le]
simp [hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two
(cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp only [PNat.pow_coe, gt_iff_lt, PNat.pos, pow_pos]))
hs htwo]
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ 2 ^ k - 1` in a `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is `(-2) ^ 2 ^ k`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {2 ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ 2 ^ k - 1) = (-2) ^ (2 : ℕ) ^ k := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {2 ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_iff ℤ (Sₘ := K) (Rₘ := ℚ) rfl.le]
simp [hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (pow_pos (by decide) _))]
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is `p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) {s : ℕ} (hs : s ≤ k) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s - 1) = p ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s := by
refine hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two hs (fun h ↦ hodd ?_)
suffices h : (p : ℕ) = 2 from PNat.coe_injective h
apply eq_of_prime_pow_eq hp.out.prime Nat.prime_two.prime (k - s).succ_pos
rw [pow_one]
exact congr_arg Subtype.val h
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
`p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1) = p := by
simpa only [pow_zero, pow_one] using
hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Nat.zero_le _) hodd
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is `p` if
`p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (h : p ≠ 2) : Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1) = p := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two h
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
a prime if `p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (htwo : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
Prime (Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
have := hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two (zero_le _) htwo
simp only [pow_zero, pow_one] at this
rw [this]
exact Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
a prime if `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
have := hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hodd
simp only [pow_zero, pow_one] at this
rw [this]
exact Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a prime if
`p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact hζ.prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hodd
/-- In a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ `, we have that `ζ` is not congruent to an
integer modulo `p` if `p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
theorem not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_pow_ne_two
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (htwo : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
¬(∃ n : ℤ, (p : 𝓞 K) ∣ (hζ.toInteger - n : 𝓞 K)) := by
intro ⟨n, x, h⟩
-- Let `pB` be the power basis of `𝓞 K` given by powers of `ζ`.
let pB := hζ.integralPowerBasis
have hdim : pB.dim = ↑p ^ k * (↑p - 1) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis_dim, pB, Nat.totient_prime_pow hp.1 (Nat.zero_lt_succ k)]
replace hdim : 1 < pB.dim := by
rw [Nat.one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one, hdim]
refine ⟨by simp only [ne_eq, mul_eq_zero, pow_eq_zero_iff', PNat.ne_zero, false_and, false_or,
Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, not_le, Nat.Prime.one_lt hp.out], ne_of_gt ?_⟩
by_cases hk : k = 0
· simp only [hk, zero_add, pow_one, pow_zero, one_mul, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt,
Nat.reduceAdd] at htwo ⊢
exact htwo.symm.lt_of_le hp.1.two_le
· exact one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (one_lt_pow₀ hp.1.one_lt hk)
(have := Nat.Prime.two_le hp.out; by omega)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at h
-- We are assuming that `ζ = n + p * x` for some integer `n` and `x : 𝓞 K`. Looking at the
-- coordinates in the base `pB`, we obtain that `1` is a multiple of `p`, contradiction.
replace h := pB.basis.ext_elem_iff.1 h ⟨1, hdim⟩
have := pB.basis_eq_pow ⟨1, hdim⟩
rw [hζ.integralPowerBasis_gen] at this
simp only [PowerBasis.coe_basis, pow_one] at this
rw [← this, show pB.gen = pB.gen ^ (⟨1, hdim⟩ : Fin pB.dim).1 by simp, ← pB.basis_eq_pow,
pB.basis.repr_self_apply] at h
simp only [↓reduceIte, map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.add_apply] at h
rw [show (p : 𝓞 K) * x = (p : ℤ) • x by simp, ← pB.basis.coord_apply,
LinearMap.map_smul, ← zsmul_one, ← pB.basis.coord_apply, LinearMap.map_smul,
show 1 = pB.gen ^ (⟨0, by omega⟩ : Fin pB.dim).1 by simp, ← pB.basis_eq_pow,
pB.basis.coord_apply, pB.basis.coord_apply, pB.basis.repr_self_apply] at h
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Fin.mk.injEq, zero_ne_one, ↓reduceIte, mul_zero, add_zero] at h
exact (Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime.2 (by simp [hp.1])).not_dvd_one ⟨_, h⟩
/-- In a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ `, we have that `ζ` is not congruent to an
integer modulo `p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
theorem not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
¬(∃ n : ℤ, (p : 𝓞 K) ∣ (hζ.toInteger - n : 𝓞 K)) := by
refine not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp_all only [(@Nat.Prime.pow_eq_iff 2 p (k+1) Nat.prime_two).mp (by assumption_mod_cast),
pow_one, ne_eq]
/-- In a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ `, we have that `ζ` is not congruent to an
integer modulo `p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
theorem not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
¬(∃ n : ℤ, (p : 𝓞 K) ∣ (hζ.toInteger - n : 𝓞 K)) := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two hζ hodd
theorem finite_quotient_span_sub_one [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) :
Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one (one_lt_pow₀ hp.1.one_lt (Nat.zero_ne_add_one k).symm)
(RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
theorem finite_quotient_span_sub_one' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) :
Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact hζ.finite_quotient_span_sub_one
/-- In a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, we have that
`ζ - 1` divides `p` in `𝓞 K`. -/
lemma toInteger_sub_one_dvd_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) : ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) ∣ p := by
by_cases htwo : p ^ (k + 1) = 2
· replace htwo : (p : ℕ) ^ (k + 1) = 2 := by exact_mod_cast htwo
have ⟨hp2, hk⟩ := (Nat.Prime.pow_eq_iff Nat.prime_two).1 htwo
simp only [add_eq_right] at hk
have hζ' : ζ = -1 := by
refine IsPrimitiveRoot.eq_neg_one_of_two_right ?_
rwa [hk, zero_add, pow_one, hp2] at hζ
replace hζ' : hζ.toInteger = -1 := by
ext
exact hζ'
rw [hζ', hp2]
exact ⟨-1, by ring⟩
suffices (hζ.toInteger - 1) ∣ (p : ℤ) by simpa
have := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
have H := hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two (zero_le _) htwo
rw [pow_zero, pow_one] at H
rw [← Ideal.norm_dvd_iff, H]
· simp
· exact prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two hζ htwo
/-- In a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, we have that `ζ - 1` divides `p` in `𝓞 K`. -/
lemma toInteger_sub_one_dvd_prime' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) ∣ p := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact toInteger_sub_one_dvd_prime hζ
/-- We have that `hζ.toInteger - 1` does not divide `2`. -/
lemma toInteger_sub_one_not_dvd_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) : ¬ hζ.toInteger - 1 ∣ 2 := fun h ↦ by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
replace h : hζ.toInteger - 1 ∣ ↑(2 : ℤ) := by simp [h]
rw [← Ideal.norm_dvd_iff, hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hodd] at h
· refine hodd <| PNat.coe_inj.1 <| (prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq ?_ ?_).1 ?_
· exact Nat.prime_iff.1 hp.1
· exact Nat.prime_iff.1 Nat.prime_two
· exact Int.ofNat_dvd.mp h
· rw [hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hodd]
exact Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1
end IsPrimitiveRoot
section absdiscr
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
open nonZeroDivisors IsPrimitiveRoot
variable (K p k)
variable [CharZero K]
/-- We compute the absolute discriminant of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic field.
Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and `p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`.
See also the results below. -/
theorem absdiscr_prime_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
haveI : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ k} ℚ K
NumberField.discr K =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
have hζ := IsCyclotomicExtension.zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ k} ℚ K
let pB₁ := integralPowerBasis hζ
apply (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int
rw [← NumberField.discr_eq_discr _ pB₁.basis, ← Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization ℤ ℤ⁰ K]
convert IsCyclotomicExtension.discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).2) using 1
· have : pB₁.dim = (IsPrimitiveRoot.powerBasis ℚ hζ).dim := by
| rw [← PowerBasis.finrank, ← PowerBasis.finrank]
exact RingOfIntegers.rank K
rw [← Algebra.discr_reindex _ _ (finCongr this)]
congr 1
ext i
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, Basis.localizationLocalization_apply, powerBasis_dim,
PowerBasis.coe_basis, pB₁, integralPowerBasis_gen]
convert ← ((IsPrimitiveRoot.powerBasis ℚ hζ).basis_eq_pow i).symm using 1
· simp_rw [algebraMap_int_eq, map_mul, map_pow, map_neg, map_one, map_natCast]
open Nat in
/-- We compute the absolute discriminant of a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic field.
Beware that in the case `p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0`. See also the results below. -/
theorem absdiscr_prime_pow_succ [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K] :
haveI : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
NumberField.discr K =
(-1) ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * (p - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
simpa [totient_prime_pow hp.out (succ_pos k)] using absdiscr_prime_pow p (k + 1) K
/-- We compute the absolute discriminant of a `p`-th cyclotomic field where `p` is prime. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 579 | 598 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition
This file contains some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition.
Most of them are generalized from the same result assuming the base ring being division ring,
and are moved from the files `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean`
and `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FiniteDimensional.lean`.
-/
open Cardinal Module Module Set Submodule
universe u v
section Module
variable {K : Type u} {V : Type v} [Ring K] [StrongRankCondition K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- The `ι` indexed basis on `V`, where `ι` is an empty type and `V` is zero-dimensional.
See also `Module.finBasis`.
-/
noncomputable def Basis.ofRankEqZero [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) : Basis ι K V :=
haveI : Subsingleton V := by
obtain ⟨_, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (hV ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
exact b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
Basis.empty _
@[simp]
theorem Basis.ofRankEqZero_apply [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) (i : ι) : Basis.ofRankEqZero hV i = 0 := rfl
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent [Module.Free K V] {c : Cardinal} :
c ≤ Module.rank K V ↔ ∃ s : Set V, #s = c ∧ LinearIndepOn K id s := by
| haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨κ, t'⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
let t := t'.reindexRange
have : LinearIndepOn K id (Set.range t') := by
convert t.linearIndependent.linearIndepOn_id
ext
simp [t]
rw [← t.mk_eq_rank'', le_mk_iff_exists_subset] at h
rcases h with ⟨s, hst, hsc⟩
exact ⟨s, hsc, this.mono hst⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact si.cardinal_le_rank
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/FreeAndStrongRankCondition.lean | 46 | 60 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
/-!
# Preserving pullbacks
Constructions to relate the notions of preserving pullbacks and reflecting pullbacks to concrete
pullback cones.
In particular, we show that `pullbackComparison G f g` is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves
the pullback of `f` and `g`.
The dual is also given.
## TODO
* Generalise to wide pullbacks
-/
noncomputable section
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
section Pullback
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace PullbackCone
variable {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (c : PullbackCone f g) (G : C ⥤ D)
/-- The image of a pullback cone by a functor. -/
abbrev map : PullbackCone (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
PullbackCone.mk (G.map c.fst) (G.map c.snd)
(by simpa using G.congr_map c.condition)
/-- The map (as a cone) of a pullback cone is limit iff
the map (as a pullback cone) is limit. -/
def isLimitMapConeEquiv :
IsLimit (mapCone G c) ≃ IsLimit (c.map G) :=
(IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan.{v₂} _) _).symm.trans <|
IsLimit.equivIsoLimit <| by
refine PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_ ?_
· dsimp only [fst]
simp
· dsimp only [snd]
simp
end PullbackCone
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
variable {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : W ⟶ X} {k : W ⟶ Y} (comm : h ≫ f = k ≫ g)
/-- The map of a pullback cone is a limit iff the fork consisting of the mapped morphisms is a
limit. This essentially lets us commute `PullbackCone.mk` with `Functor.mapCone`. -/
def isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv :
IsLimit (mapCone G (PullbackCone.mk h k comm)) ≃
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, comm]) :
PullbackCone (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
(PullbackCone.mk _ _ comm).isLimitMapConeEquiv G
/-- The property of preserving pullbacks expressed in terms of binary fans. -/
def isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit [PreservesLimit (cospan f g) G]
(l : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk h k comm)) :
have : G.map h ≫ G.map f = G.map k ≫ G.map g := by rw [← G.map_comp, ← G.map_comp,comm]
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) this) :=
(PullbackCone.isLimitMapConeEquiv _ G).1 (isLimitOfPreserves G l)
/-- The property of reflecting pullbacks expressed in terms of binary fans. -/
def isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap [ReflectsLimit (cospan f g) G]
(l : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (show G.map h ≫ G.map f = G.map k ≫ G.map g
from by simp only [← G.map_comp, comm]))) : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk h k comm) :=
isLimitOfReflects G
((PullbackCone.isLimitMapConeEquiv (PullbackCone.mk _ _ comm) G).2 l)
variable (f g) [PreservesLimit (cospan f g) G]
/-- If `G` preserves pullbacks and `C` has them, then the pullback cone constructed of the mapped
morphisms of the pullback cone is a limit. -/
def isLimitOfHasPullbackOfPreservesLimit [HasPullback f g] :
have : G.map (pullback.fst f g) ≫ G.map f = G.map (pullback.snd f g) ≫ G.map g := by
simp only [← G.map_comp, pullback.condition]
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (G.map (pullback.fst f g)) (G.map (pullback.snd f g)) this) :=
isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit G _ (pullbackIsPullback f g)
/-- If `F` preserves the pullback of `f, g`, it also preserves the pullback of `g, f`. -/
lemma preservesPullback_symmetry : PreservesLimit (cospan g f) G where
preserves {c} hc := ⟨by
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan.{v₂} _) _).toFun
apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (PullbackCone.isoMk _).symm
apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).toFun
· refine @isLimitOfPreserves _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_
· apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (PullbackCone.isoMk _)
exact (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan.{v₁} _) _).invFun hc
· dsimp
infer_instance
· exact
(c.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inr).symm.trans
(c.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl :)⟩
theorem hasPullback_of_preservesPullback [HasPullback f g] : HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit G _ (pullbackIsPullback _ _)⟩⟩⟩
variable [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)]
/-- If `G` preserves the pullback of `(f,g)`, then the pullback comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)` is
an isomorphism. -/
def PreservesPullback.iso : G.obj (pullback f g) ≅ pullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (isLimitOfHasPullbackOfPreservesLimit G f g) (limit.isLimit _)
@[simp]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_hom : (PreservesPullback.iso G f g).hom = pullbackComparison G f g :=
rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst :
(PreservesPullback.iso G f g).hom ≫ pullback.fst _ _ = G.map (pullback.fst f g) := by
simp [PreservesPullback.iso]
@[reassoc]
| theorem PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd :
(PreservesPullback.iso G f g).hom ≫ pullback.snd _ _ = G.map (pullback.snd f g) := by
simp [PreservesPullback.iso]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean | 138 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
| theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 121 | 125 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Insert
/-!
# Subsingleton
Defines the predicate `Subsingleton s : Prop`, saying that `s` has at most one element.
Also defines `Nontrivial s : Prop` : the predicate saying that `s` has at least two distinct
elements.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
universe u v
namespace Set
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
section Subsingleton
variable {α : Type u} {a : α} {s t : Set α}
/-- A set `s` is a `Subsingleton` if it has at most one element. -/
protected def Subsingleton (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), x = y
theorem Subsingleton.anti (ht : t.Subsingleton) (hst : s ⊆ t) : s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
ht (hst hx) (hst hy)
theorem Subsingleton.eq_singleton_of_mem (hs : s.Subsingleton) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : s = {x} :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun hy => hs hx hy ▸ mem_singleton _, fun hy => (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_empty : (∅ : Set α).Subsingleton := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_singleton {a} : ({a} : Set α).Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton hx).symm ▸ (eq_of_mem_singleton hy).symm ▸ rfl
theorem subsingleton_of_subset_singleton (h : s ⊆ {a}) : s.Subsingleton :=
subsingleton_singleton.anti h
theorem subsingleton_of_forall_eq (a : α) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, b = a) : s.Subsingleton := fun _ hb _ hc =>
(h _ hb).trans (h _ hc).symm
theorem subsingleton_iff_singleton {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.Subsingleton ↔ s = {x} :=
⟨fun h => h.eq_singleton_of_mem hx, fun h => h.symm ▸ subsingleton_singleton⟩
theorem Subsingleton.eq_empty_or_singleton (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => Or.inr ⟨x, hs.eq_singleton_of_mem hx⟩
theorem Subsingleton.induction_on {p : Set α → Prop} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (he : p ∅)
(h₁ : ∀ x, p {x}) : p s := by
rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [he, h₁ _]
theorem subsingleton_univ [Subsingleton α] : (univ : Set α).Subsingleton := fun x _ y _ =>
Subsingleton.elim x y
theorem subsingleton_of_univ_subsingleton (h : (univ : Set α).Subsingleton) : Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun a b => h (mem_univ a) (mem_univ b)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_univ_iff : (univ : Set α).Subsingleton ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨subsingleton_of_univ_subsingleton, fun h => @subsingleton_univ _ h⟩
lemma Subsingleton.inter_singleton : (s ∩ {a}).Subsingleton :=
Set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton Set.inter_subset_right
lemma Subsingleton.singleton_inter : ({a} ∩ s).Subsingleton :=
Set.subsingleton_of_subset_singleton Set.inter_subset_left
theorem subsingleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} : Set.Subsingleton s :=
subsingleton_univ.anti (subset_univ s)
theorem subsingleton_isTop (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] : Set.Subsingleton { x : α | IsTop x } :=
fun x hx _ hy => hx.isMax.eq_of_le (hy x)
theorem subsingleton_isBot (α : Type*) [PartialOrder α] : Set.Subsingleton { x : α | IsBot x } :=
fun x hx _ hy => hx.isMin.eq_of_ge (hy x)
theorem exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton :
(∃ a : α, s = {a}) ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ s.Subsingleton := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨singleton_nonempty a, subsingleton_singleton⟩
· exact h.2.eq_empty_or_singleton.resolve_left h.1.ne_empty
/-- `s`, coerced to a type, is a subsingleton type if and only if `s` is a subsingleton set. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem subsingleton_coe (s : Set α) : Subsingleton s ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
constructor
· refine fun h => fun a ha b hb => ?_
exact SetCoe.ext_iff.2 (@Subsingleton.elim s h ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩)
· exact fun h => Subsingleton.intro fun a b => SetCoe.ext (h a.property b.property)
theorem Subsingleton.coe_sort {s : Set α} : s.Subsingleton → Subsingleton s :=
s.subsingleton_coe.2
/-- The `coe_sort` of a set `s` in a subsingleton type is a subsingleton.
For the corresponding result for `Subtype`, see `subtype.subsingleton`. -/
instance subsingleton_coe_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} : Subsingleton s := by
rw [s.subsingleton_coe]
exact subsingleton_of_subsingleton
end Subsingleton
/-! ### Nontrivial -/
section Nontrivial
variable {α : Type u} {a : α} {s t : Set α}
/-- A set `s` is `Set.Nontrivial` if it has at least two distinct elements. -/
protected def Nontrivial (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y
theorem nontrivial_of_mem_mem_ne {x y} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) : s.Nontrivial :=
⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
/-- Extract witnesses from s.nontrivial. This function might be used instead of case analysis on the
argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the classical.choice axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nontrivial.choose (hs : s.Nontrivial) : α × α :=
(Exists.choose hs, hs.choose_spec.right.choose)
protected theorem Nontrivial.choose_fst_mem (hs : s.Nontrivial) : hs.choose.fst ∈ s :=
hs.choose_spec.left
protected theorem Nontrivial.choose_snd_mem (hs : s.Nontrivial) : hs.choose.snd ∈ s :=
hs.choose_spec.right.choose_spec.left
protected theorem Nontrivial.choose_fst_ne_choose_snd (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
hs.choose.fst ≠ hs.choose.snd :=
hs.choose_spec.right.choose_spec.right
theorem Nontrivial.mono (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hst : s ⊆ t) : t.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hst hx, y, hst hy, hxy⟩
theorem nontrivial_pair {x y} (hxy : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).Nontrivial :=
⟨x, mem_insert _ _, y, mem_insert_of_mem _ (mem_singleton _), hxy⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_pair_subset {x y} (hxy : x ≠ y) (h : {x, y} ⊆ s) : s.Nontrivial :=
(nontrivial_pair hxy).mono h
theorem Nontrivial.pair_subset (hs : s.Nontrivial) : ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ {x, y} ⊆ s :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, y, hxy, insert_subset hx <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hy⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_pair_subset : s.Nontrivial ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ {x, y} ⊆ s :=
⟨Nontrivial.pair_subset, fun H =>
let ⟨_, _, hxy, h⟩ := H
nontrivial_of_pair_subset hxy h⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_exists_ne {x} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : ∃ y ∈ s, y ≠ x) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨y, hy, hyx⟩ := h
⟨y, hy, x, hx, hyx⟩
theorem Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (z) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ≠ z := by
by_contra! H
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
rw [H x hx, H y hy] at hxy
exact hxy rfl
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, y ≠ x :=
⟨fun H => H.exists_ne _, nontrivial_of_exists_ne hx⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_lt [Preorder α] {x y} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x < y) :
s.Nontrivial :=
⟨x, hx, y, hy, ne_of_lt hxy⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_exists_lt [Preorder α]
(H : ∃ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x < y) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩ := H
nontrivial_of_lt hx hy hxy
theorem Nontrivial.exists_lt [LinearOrder α] (hs : s.Nontrivial) : ∃ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x < y :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
Or.elim (lt_or_gt_of_ne hxy) (fun H => ⟨x, hx, y, hy, H⟩) fun H => ⟨y, hy, x, hx, H⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_lt [LinearOrder α] :
s.Nontrivial ↔ ∃ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x < y :=
⟨Nontrivial.exists_lt, nontrivial_of_exists_lt⟩
protected theorem Nontrivial.nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx, _⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx⟩
protected theorem Nontrivial.ne_empty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ ∅ :=
hs.nonempty.ne_empty
theorem Nontrivial.not_subset_empty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : ¬s ⊆ ∅ :=
hs.nonempty.not_subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nontrivial := fun h => h.ne_empty rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton {x} : ¬({x} : Set α).Nontrivial := fun H => by
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (mem_singleton x)] at H
let ⟨y, hy, hya⟩ := H
exact hya (mem_singleton_iff.1 hy)
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton {x} (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {x} := fun H => by
rw [H] at hs
exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
theorem Nontrivial.not_subset_singleton {x} (hs : s.Nontrivial) : ¬s ⊆ {x} :=
(not_congr subset_singleton_iff_eq).2 (not_or_intro hs.ne_empty hs.ne_singleton)
theorem nontrivial_univ [Nontrivial α] : (univ : Set α).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne α
⟨x, mem_univ _, y, mem_univ _, hxy⟩
theorem nontrivial_of_univ_nontrivial (h : (univ : Set α).Nontrivial) : Nontrivial α :=
let ⟨x, _, y, _, hxy⟩ := h
⟨⟨x, y, hxy⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_univ_iff : (univ : Set α).Nontrivial ↔ Nontrivial α :=
⟨nontrivial_of_univ_nontrivial, fun h => @nontrivial_univ _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_univ [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : {a} ≠ univ :=
nonempty_compl.mp (nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial a)
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ssubset_univ [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : {a} ⊂ univ :=
ssubset_univ_iff.mpr <| singleton_ne_univ a
theorem nontrivial_of_nontrivial (hs : s.Nontrivial) : Nontrivial α :=
let ⟨x, _, y, _, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨⟨x, y, hxy⟩⟩
/-- `s`, coerced to a type, is a nontrivial type if and only if `s` is a nontrivial set. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nontrivial_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nontrivial s ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [← nontrivial_univ_iff, Set.Nontrivial]
alias ⟨_, Nontrivial.coe_sort⟩ := nontrivial_coe_sort
/-- A type with a set `s` whose `coe_sort` is a nontrivial type is nontrivial.
For the corresponding result for `Subtype`, see `Subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne`. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_nontrivial_coe (hs : Nontrivial s) : Nontrivial α :=
nontrivial_of_nontrivial <| nontrivial_coe_sort.1 hs
theorem nontrivial_mono {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Nontrivial s) :
Nontrivial t :=
Nontrivial.coe_sort <| (nontrivial_coe_sort.1 hs).mono hst
@[simp]
theorem not_subsingleton_iff : ¬s.Subsingleton ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp_rw [Set.Subsingleton, Set.Nontrivial, not_forall, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_iff : ¬s.Nontrivial ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
Iff.not_left not_subsingleton_iff.symm
alias ⟨_, Subsingleton.not_nontrivial⟩ := not_nontrivial_iff
alias ⟨_, Nontrivial.not_subsingleton⟩ := not_subsingleton_iff
protected lemma subsingleton_or_nontrivial (s : Set α) : s.Subsingleton ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [or_iff_not_imp_right]
lemma eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← subsingleton_iff_singleton ha]; exact s.subsingleton_or_nontrivial
lemma nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
lemma Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
theorem univ_eq_true_false : univ = ({True, False} : Set Prop) :=
Eq.symm <| eq_univ_of_forall fun x => by
rw [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
exact Classical.propComplete x
end Nontrivial
section Monotonicity
/-! ### Monotonicity on singletons -/
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {a : α} {s : Set α} [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β)
protected theorem Subsingleton.monotoneOn (h : s.Subsingleton) : MonotoneOn f s :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ => (congr_arg _ (h ha hb)).le
protected theorem Subsingleton.antitoneOn (h : s.Subsingleton) : AntitoneOn f s :=
fun _ ha _ hb _ => (congr_arg _ (h hb ha)).le
protected theorem Subsingleton.strictMonoOn (h : s.Subsingleton) : StrictMonoOn f s :=
fun _ ha _ hb hlt => (hlt.ne (h ha hb)).elim
protected theorem Subsingleton.strictAntiOn (h : s.Subsingleton) : StrictAntiOn f s :=
fun _ ha _ hb hlt => (hlt.ne (h ha hb)).elim
@[simp]
theorem monotoneOn_singleton : MonotoneOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.monotoneOn f
@[simp]
theorem antitoneOn_singleton : AntitoneOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.antitoneOn f
@[simp]
theorem strictMonoOn_singleton : StrictMonoOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.strictMonoOn f
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Subsingleton.lean | 319 | 320 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
/-!
# Localizations of localizations
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
open Function
namespace IsLocalization
section LocalizationLocalization
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
variable (N : Submonoid S) (T : Type*) [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R T]
section
variable [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T]
-- This should only be defined when `S` is the localization `M⁻¹R`, hence the nolint.
/-- Localizing wrt `M ⊆ R` and then wrt `N ⊆ S = M⁻¹R` is equal to the localization of `R` wrt this
module. See `localization_localization_isLocalization`.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def localizationLocalizationSubmodule : Submonoid R :=
(N ⊔ M.map (algebraMap R S)).comap (algebraMap R S)
variable {M N}
@[simp]
theorem mem_localizationLocalizationSubmodule {x : R} :
x ∈ localizationLocalizationSubmodule M N ↔
∃ (y : N) (z : M), algebraMap R S x = y * algebraMap R S z := by
rw [localizationLocalizationSubmodule, Submonoid.mem_comap, Submonoid.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, _, ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩, e⟩
exact ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, ⟨z, hz⟩, e.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, z, e⟩
exact ⟨y, y.prop, _, ⟨z, z.prop, rfl⟩, e.symm⟩
variable (M N)
variable [IsLocalization M S]
theorem localization_localization_map_units [IsLocalization N T]
(y : localizationLocalizationSubmodule M N) : IsUnit (algebraMap R T y) := by
obtain ⟨y', z, eq⟩ := mem_localizationLocalizationSubmodule.mp y.prop
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T, eq, RingHom.map_mul, IsUnit.mul_iff]
exact ⟨IsLocalization.map_units T y', (IsLocalization.map_units _ z).map (algebraMap S T)⟩
theorem localization_localization_surj [IsLocalization N T] (x : T) :
∃ y : R × localizationLocalizationSubmodule M N,
x * algebraMap R T y.2 = algebraMap R T y.1 := by
rcases IsLocalization.surj N x with ⟨⟨y, s⟩, eq₁⟩
-- x = y / s
rcases IsLocalization.surj M y with ⟨⟨z, t⟩, eq₂⟩
-- y = z / t
rcases IsLocalization.surj M (s : S) with ⟨⟨z', t'⟩, eq₃⟩
-- s = z' / t'
dsimp only at eq₁ eq₂ eq₃
refine ⟨⟨z * t', z' * t, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ -- x = y / s = (z * t') / (z' * t)
· rw [mem_localizationLocalizationSubmodule]
refine ⟨s, t * t', ?_⟩
rw [RingHom.map_mul, ← eq₃, mul_assoc, ← RingHom.map_mul, mul_comm t, Submonoid.coe_mul]
· simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, RingHom.map_mul, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T, ← eq₃, ← eq₂,
← eq₁]
ring
theorem localization_localization_exists_of_eq [IsLocalization N T] (x y : R) :
algebraMap R T x = algebraMap R T y →
∃ c : localizationLocalizationSubmodule M N, ↑c * x = ↑c * y := by
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T,
IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists N T]
rintro ⟨z, eq₁⟩
rcases IsLocalization.surj M (z : S) with ⟨⟨z', s⟩, eq₂⟩
dsimp only at eq₂
suffices (algebraMap R S) (x * z' : R) = (algebraMap R S) (y * z') by
obtain ⟨c, eq₃ : ↑c * (x * z') = ↑c * (y * z')⟩ := (IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S).mp this
refine ⟨⟨c * z', ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_localizationLocalizationSubmodule]
refine ⟨z, c * s, ?_⟩
rw [map_mul, ← eq₂, Submonoid.coe_mul, map_mul, mul_left_comm]
· rwa [mul_comm _ z', mul_comm _ z', ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at eq₃
rw [map_mul, map_mul, ← eq₂, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (z : S), eq₁,
mul_comm _ (z : S)]
/-- Given submodules `M ⊆ R` and `N ⊆ S = M⁻¹R`, with `f : R →+* S` the localization map, we have
`N ⁻¹ S = T = (f⁻¹ (N • f(M))) ⁻¹ R`. I.e., the localization of a localization is a localization.
-/
theorem localization_localization_isLocalization [IsLocalization N T] :
IsLocalization (localizationLocalizationSubmodule M N) T :=
{ map_units' := localization_localization_map_units M N T
surj' := localization_localization_surj M N T
exists_of_eq := localization_localization_exists_of_eq M N T _ _ }
include M in
/-- Given submodules `M ⊆ R` and `N ⊆ S = M⁻¹R`, with `f : R →+* S` the localization map, if
`N` contains all the units of `S`, then `N ⁻¹ S = T = (f⁻¹ N) ⁻¹ R`. I.e., the localization of a
localization is a localization.
-/
theorem localization_localization_isLocalization_of_has_all_units [IsLocalization N T]
(H : ∀ x : S, IsUnit x → x ∈ N) : IsLocalization (N.comap (algebraMap R S)) T := by
convert localization_localization_isLocalization M N T using 1
dsimp [localizationLocalizationSubmodule]
congr
symm
rw [sup_eq_left]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact H _ (IsLocalization.map_units _ ⟨x, hx⟩)
include M in
/--
Given a submodule `M ⊆ R` and a prime ideal `p` of `S = M⁻¹R`, with `f : R →+* S` the localization
map, then `T = Sₚ` is the localization of `R` at `f⁻¹(p)`.
-/
theorem isLocalization_isLocalization_atPrime_isLocalization (p : Ideal S) [Hp : p.IsPrime]
[IsLocalization.AtPrime T p] : IsLocalization.AtPrime T (p.comap (algebraMap R S)) := by
apply localization_localization_isLocalization_of_has_all_units M p.primeCompl T
intro x hx hx'
exact (Hp.1 : ¬_) (p.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem hx' hx)
instance (p : Ideal (Localization M)) [p.IsPrime] : Algebra R (Localization.AtPrime p) :=
inferInstance
instance (p : Ideal (Localization M)) [p.IsPrime] :
IsScalarTower R (Localization M) (Localization.AtPrime p) :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
instance isLocalization_atPrime_localization_atPrime (p : Ideal (Localization M))
[p.IsPrime] : IsLocalization.AtPrime (Localization.AtPrime p) (p.comap (algebraMap R _)) :=
isLocalization_isLocalization_atPrime_isLocalization M _ _
/-- Given a submodule `M ⊆ R` and a prime ideal `p` of `M⁻¹R`, with `f : R →+* S` the localization
map, then `(M⁻¹R)ₚ` is isomorphic (as an `R`-algebra) to the localization of `R` at `f⁻¹(p)`.
-/
noncomputable def localizationLocalizationAtPrimeIsoLocalization (p : Ideal (Localization M))
[p.IsPrime] :
Localization.AtPrime (p.comap (algebraMap R (Localization M))) ≃ₐ[R] Localization.AtPrime p :=
IsLocalization.algEquiv (p.comap (algebraMap R (Localization M))).primeCompl _ _
end
variable (S)
/-- Given submonoids `M ≤ N` of `R`, this is the canonical algebra structure
of `M⁻¹S` acting on `N⁻¹S`. -/
noncomputable def localizationAlgebraOfSubmonoidLe (M N : Submonoid R) (h : M ≤ N)
[IsLocalization M S] [IsLocalization N T] : Algebra S T :=
(@IsLocalization.lift R _ M S _ _ T _ _ (algebraMap R T)
(fun y => map_units T ⟨↑y, h y.prop⟩)).toAlgebra
/-- If `M ≤ N` are submonoids of `R`, then the natural map `M⁻¹S →+* N⁻¹S` commutes with the
localization maps -/
theorem localization_isScalarTower_of_submonoid_le (M N : Submonoid R) (h : M ≤ N)
[IsLocalization M S] [IsLocalization N T] :
@IsScalarTower R S T _ (localizationAlgebraOfSubmonoidLe S T M N h).toSMul _ :=
letI := localizationAlgebraOfSubmonoidLe S T M N h
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' (IsLocalization.lift_comp _).symm
noncomputable instance (x : Ideal R) [H : x.IsPrime] [IsDomain R] :
Algebra (Localization.AtPrime x) (Localization (nonZeroDivisors R)) :=
localizationAlgebraOfSubmonoidLe _ _ x.primeCompl (nonZeroDivisors R)
(by
intro a ha
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero]
exact fun h => ha (h.symm ▸ x.zero_mem))
instance {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (p : Ideal R) [p.IsPrime] :
IsScalarTower R (Localization.AtPrime p) (FractionRing R) :=
localization_isScalarTower_of_submonoid_le (Localization.AtPrime p) (FractionRing R)
p.primeCompl (nonZeroDivisors R) p.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors
/-- If `M ≤ N` are submonoids of `R`, then `N⁻¹S` is also the localization of `M⁻¹S` at `N`. -/
theorem isLocalization_of_submonoid_le (M N : Submonoid R) (h : M ≤ N) [IsLocalization M S]
[IsLocalization N T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] :
IsLocalization (N.map (algebraMap R S)) T :=
{ map_units' := by
rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩⟩
convert IsLocalization.map_units T ⟨y, hy⟩
exact (IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm
surj' := fun y => by
obtain ⟨⟨x, s⟩, e⟩ := IsLocalization.surj N y
refine ⟨⟨algebraMap R S x, _, _, s.prop, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
simpa [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply] using e
exists_of_eq := fun {x₁ x₂} => by
obtain ⟨⟨y₁, s₁⟩, e₁⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M x₁
obtain ⟨⟨y₂, s₂⟩, e₂⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M x₂
refine (Set.exists_image_iff (algebraMap R S) N fun c => c * x₁ = c * x₂).mpr.comp ?_
dsimp only at e₁ e₂ ⊢
suffices algebraMap R T (y₁ * s₂) = algebraMap R T (y₂ * s₁) →
∃ a : N, algebraMap R S (a * (y₁ * s₂)) = algebraMap R S (a * (y₂ * s₁)) by
have h₁ := @IsUnit.mul_left_inj T _ _ (algebraMap S T x₁) (algebraMap S T x₂)
(IsLocalization.map_units T ⟨(s₁ : R), h s₁.prop⟩)
have h₂ := @IsUnit.mul_left_inj T _ _ ((algebraMap S T x₁) * (algebraMap R T s₁))
((algebraMap S T x₂) * (algebraMap R T s₁))
(IsLocalization.map_units T ⟨(s₂ : R), h s₂.prop⟩)
simp only [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T, Subtype.coe_mk] at h₁ h₂
simp only [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T, map_mul, ← e₁, ← e₂, ← mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm _ (algebraMap R S s₂),
mul_right_comm _ (algebraMap S T (algebraMap R S s₂)),
(IsLocalization.map_units S s₁).mul_left_inj,
(IsLocalization.map_units S s₂).mul_left_inj] at this
rw [h₂, h₁] at this
simpa only [mul_comm] using this
simp_rw [IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists N T, IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M S]
intro ⟨a, e⟩
exact ⟨a, 1, by convert e using 1 <;> simp⟩ }
/-- If `M ≤ N` are submonoids of `R` such that `∀ x : N, ∃ m : R, m * x ∈ M`, then the
localization at `N` is equal to the localizaton of `M`. -/
theorem isLocalization_of_is_exists_mul_mem (M N : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] (h : M ≤ N)
(h' : ∀ x : N, ∃ m : R, m * x ∈ M) : IsLocalization N S :=
{ map_units' := fun y => by
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := h' y
have := IsLocalization.map_units S ⟨_, hm⟩
rw [map_mul] at this
exact (IsUnit.mul_iff.mp this).2
surj' := fun z => by
obtain ⟨⟨y, s⟩, e⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M z
exact ⟨⟨y, _, h s.prop⟩, e⟩
exists_of_eq := fun {_ _} => by
rw [IsLocalization.eq_iff_exists M]
exact fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨⟨_, h x.prop⟩, hx⟩ }
theorem mk'_eq_algebraMap_mk'_of_submonoid_le {M N : Submonoid R} (h : M ≤ N) [IsLocalization M S]
[IsLocalization N T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] (x : R) (y : {a : R // a ∈ M}) :
mk' T x ⟨y.1, h y.2⟩ = algebraMap S T (mk' S x y) :=
mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr (by simp only [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S T, ← map_mul, mk'_spec])
end LocalizationLocalization
end IsLocalization
namespace IsFractionRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R)
open IsLocalization
theorem isFractionRing_of_isLocalization (S T : Type*) [CommRing S] [CommRing T] [Algebra R S]
[Algebra R T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] [IsLocalization M S] [IsFractionRing R T]
(hM : M ≤ nonZeroDivisors R) : IsFractionRing S T := by
have := isLocalization_of_submonoid_le S T M (nonZeroDivisors R) hM
refine @isLocalization_of_is_exists_mul_mem _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this ?_ ?_
| · exact map_nonZeroDivisors_le M S
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨⟨y, s⟩, e⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M x
use algebraMap R S s
rw [mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk, e]
refine Set.mem_image_of_mem (algebraMap R S) ?_
intro z hz
apply IsLocalization.injective S hM
rw [map_zero]
apply hx
rw [← (map_units S s).mul_left_inj, mul_assoc, e, ← map_mul, hz, map_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem isFractionRing_of_isDomain_of_isLocalization [IsDomain R] (S T : Type*) [CommRing S]
[CommRing T] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T]
[IsLocalization M S] [IsFractionRing R T] : IsFractionRing S T := by
haveI := IsFractionRing.nontrivial R T
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/LocalizationLocalization.lean | 262 | 278 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Multilinear maps
We define multilinear maps as maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂` which are linear in each
coordinate. Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type
(although some statements will require it to be a fintype). This space, denoted by
`MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂`, inherits a module structure by pointwise addition and multiplication.
## Main definitions
* `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of multilinear maps from `∀ (i : ι), M₁ i` to `M₂`.
* `f.map_update_smul` is the multiplicativity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_update_add` is the additivity of the multilinear map `f` along each coordinate.
* `f.map_smul_univ` expresses the multiplicativity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`.
* `f.map_add_univ` expresses the additivity of `f` over all coordinates at the same time, writing
`f (m + m')` as the sum over all subsets `s` of `ι` of `f (s.piecewise m m')`.
* `f.map_sum` expresses `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` as the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all possible functions.
See `Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry` for the currying of multilinear maps.
## Implementation notes
Expressing that a map is linear along the `i`-th coordinate when all other coordinates are fixed
can be done in two (equivalent) different ways:
* fixing a vector `m : ∀ (j : ι - i), M₁ j.val`, and then choosing separately the `i`-th coordinate
* fixing a vector `m : ∀j, M₁ j`, and then modifying its `i`-th coordinate
The second way is more artificial as the value of `m` at `i` is not relevant, but it has the
advantage of avoiding subtype inclusion issues. This is the definition we use, based on
`Function.update` that allows to change the value of `m` at `i`.
Note that the use of `Function.update` requires a `DecidableEq ι` term to appear somewhere in the
statement of `MultilinearMap.map_update_add'` and `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul'`.
Three possible choices are:
1. Requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `MultilinearMap` (as we did originally).
2. Using `Classical.decEq ι` in the statement of `map_add'` and `map_smul'`.
3. Quantifying over all possible `DecidableEq ι` instances in the statement of `map_add'` and
`map_smul'`.
Option 1 works fine, but puts unnecessary constraints on the user
(the zero map certainly does not need decidability).
Option 2 looks great at first, but in the common case when `ι = Fin n`
it introduces non-defeq decidability instance diamonds
within the context of proving `map_update_add'` and `map_update_smul'`,
of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = Classical.decEq (Fin n)`.
Option 3 of course does something similar, but of the form `Fin.decidableEq n = _inst`,
which is much easier to clean up since `_inst` is a free variable
and so the equality can just be substituted.
-/
open Fin Function Finset Set
universe uR uS uι v v' v₁ v₂ v₃
variable {R : Type uR} {S : Type uS} {ι : Type uι} {n : ℕ}
{M : Fin n.succ → Type v} {M₁ : ι → Type v₁} {M₂ : Type v₂} {M₃ : Type v₃} {M' : Type v'}
-- Don't generate injectivity lemmas, which the `simpNF` linter will time out on.
set_option genInjectivity false in
/-- Multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules
over `R`. -/
structure MultilinearMap (R : Type uR) {ι : Type uι} (M₁ : ι → Type v₁) (M₂ : Type v₂) [Semiring R]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] where
/-- The underlying multivariate function of a multilinear map. -/
toFun : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂
/-- A multilinear map is additive in every argument. -/
map_update_add' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (x + y)) = toFun (update m i x) + toFun (update m i y)
/-- A multilinear map is compatible with scalar multiplication in every argument. -/
map_update_smul' :
∀ [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
toFun (update m i (c • x)) = c • toFun (update m i x)
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[Module R M₃] [Module R M'] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : FunLike (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; cases h; rfl
initialize_simps_projections MultilinearMap (toFun → apply)
/-- Constructor for `MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` when the
index type `ι` is already endowed with a `DecidableEq` instance. -/
@[simps]
def mk' [DecidableEq ι] (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂)
(h₁ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i),
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) := by aesop)
(h₂ : ∀ (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i),
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) := by aesop) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' m i x y := by convert h₁ m i x y
map_update_smul' m i c x := by convert h₂ m i c x
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) (h₁ h₂) : ⇑(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem congr_fun {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (h : f = g) (x : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
nonrec theorem congr_arg (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {x y : ∀ i, M₁ i} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} : (f : (∀ i, M₁ i) → M₂) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (h₁ h₂) :
(⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = f := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x + y)) = f (update m i x) + f (update m i y) :=
f.map_update_add' m i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add' := MultilinearMap.map_update_add
/-- Earlier, this name was used by what is now called `MultilinearMap.map_update_smul_left`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (c • x)) = c • f (update m i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' m i c x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul' := MultilinearMap.map_update_smul
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ∀ i, M₁ i} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 := by
classical
have : (0 : R) • (0 : M₁ i) = 0 := by simp
rw [← update_eq_self i m, h, ← this, f.map_update_smul, zero_smul]
@[simp]
theorem map_update_zero [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : f (update m i 0) = 0 :=
f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, _⟩ : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ Set.univ := Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty ι
exact map_coord_zero f i rfl
instance : Add (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f f' =>
⟨fun x => f x + f' x, fun m i x y => by simp [add_left_comm, add_assoc], fun m i c x => by
simp [smul_add]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f + f') m = f m + f' m :=
rfl
instance : Zero (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => 0, fun _ _ _ _ => by simp, fun _ _ c _ => by simp⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) m = 0 :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [DistribSMul S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
instance : SMul S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun c f =>
⟨fun m => c • f m, fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add], fun l i x d => by
simp [← smul_comm x c (_ : M₂)]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (c : S) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
theorem coe_smul (c : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : ⇑(c • f) = c • (⇑ f) := rfl
end SMul
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
/-- Coercion of a multilinear map to a function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def coeAddMonoidHom : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →+ (((i : ι) → M₁ i) → M₂) where
toFun := DFunLike.coe; map_zero' := rfl; map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sum {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, ⇑(f a) :=
map_sum coeAddMonoidHom f s
theorem sum_apply {α : Type*} (f : α → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) {s : Finset α} :
(∑ a ∈ s, f a) m = ∑ a ∈ s, f a m := by simp
/-- If `f` is a multilinear map, then `f.toLinearMap m i` is the linear map obtained by fixing all
coordinates but `i` equal to those of `m`, and varying the `i`-th coordinate. -/
@[simps]
def toLinearMap [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun x := f (update m i x)
map_add' x y := by simp
map_smul' c x := by simp
/-- The cartesian product of two multilinear maps, as a multilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ (M₂ × M₃) where
toFun m := (f m, g m)
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
/-- Combine a family of multilinear maps with the same domain and codomains `M' i` into a
multilinear map taking values in the space of functions `∀ i, M' i`. -/
@[simps]
def pi {ι' : Type*} {M' : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M' i)]
(f : ∀ i, MultilinearMap R M₁ (M' i)) : MultilinearMap R M₁ (∀ i, M' i) where
toFun m i := f i m
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_add _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := funext fun j => (f j).map_update_smul _ _ _ _
section
variable (R M₂ M₃)
/-- Equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃` and one-multilinear maps. -/
@[simps]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f (x i)
map_update_add' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton]
map_update_smul' := by intros; simp [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := fun x ↦ f fun _ ↦ x
map_add' := fun x y ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_add 0 i x y
map_smul' := fun c x ↦ by
simpa [update_eq_const_of_subsingleton] using f.map_update_smul 0 i c x }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext x; refine congr_arg f ?_; exact (eq_const_of_subsingleton _ _).symm
variable (M₁) {M₂}
/-- The constant map is multilinear when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := Function.const _ m
map_update_add' _ := isEmptyElim
map_update_smul' _ := isEmptyElim
end
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `Fin n`) and a subset `s` of `k`
of these variables, one gets a new multilinear map on `Fin k` by varying these variables, and fixing
the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by `f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a
proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit identification between `Fin k` and `s` that
we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => M') M₂) (s : Finset (Fin n))
(hk : #s = k) (z : M') : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin k => M') M₂ where
toFun v := f fun j => if h : j ∈ s then v ((s.orderIsoOfFin hk).symm ⟨j, h⟩) else z
/- Porting note: The proofs of the following two lemmas used to only use `erw` followed by `simp`,
but it seems `erw` no longer unfolds or unifies well enough to work without more help. -/
map_update_add' v i x y := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
map_update_smul' v i c x := by
erw [dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv,
dite_comp_equiv_update (s.orderIsoOfFin hk).toEquiv]
simp
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (x y : M 0) :
f (cons (x + y) m) = f (cons x m) + f (cons y m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem cons_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M i.succ) (c : R) (x : M 0) :
f (cons (c • x) m) = c • f (cons x m) := by
simp_rw [← update_cons_zero x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_cons_zero]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `snoc`, one can express directly the additivity of a
multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_add (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂)
(m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (x y : M (last n)) :
f (snoc m (x + y)) = f (snoc m x) + f (snoc m y) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (x + y), f.map_update_add, update_snoc_last]
/-- In the specific case of multilinear maps on spaces indexed by `Fin (n+1)`, where one can build
an element of `∀ (i : Fin (n+1)), M i` using `cons`, one can express directly the multiplicativity
of a multilinear map along the first variable. -/
theorem snoc_smul (f : MultilinearMap R M M₂) (m : ∀ i : Fin n, M (castSucc i)) (c : R)
(x : M (last n)) : f (snoc m (c • x)) = c • f (snoc m x) := by
simp_rw [← update_snoc_last x m (c • x), f.map_update_smul, update_snoc_last]
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)]
variable {M₁'' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁'' i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁'' i)]
/-- If `g` is a multilinear map and `f` is a collection of linear maps,
then `g (f₁ m₁, ..., fₙ mₙ)` is again a multilinear map, that we call
`g.compLinearMap f`. -/
def compLinearMap (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun m := g fun i => f i (m i)
map_update_add' m i x y := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by
have : ∀ j z, f j (update m i z j) = update (fun k => f k (m k)) i (f i z) j := fun j z =>
Function.apply_update (fun k => f k) _ _ _ _
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_apply (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : g.compLinearMap f m = g fun i => f i (m i) :=
rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map twice with a linear map in each argument is
the same as composing with their composition. -/
theorem compLinearMap_assoc (g : MultilinearMap R M₁'' M₂) (f₁ : ∀ i, M₁' i →ₗ[R] M₁'' i)
(f₂ : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap f₁).compLinearMap f₂ = g.compLinearMap fun i => f₁ i ∘ₗ f₂ i :=
rfl
/-- Composing the zero multilinear map with a linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_compLinearMap (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(0 : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂).compLinearMap f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing a multilinear map with the identity linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_id (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) :
(g.compLinearMap fun _ => LinearMap.id) = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing with a family of surjective linear maps is injective. -/
theorem compLinearMap_injective (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i)) :
Injective fun g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ => g.compLinearMap f := fun g₁ g₂ h =>
ext fun x => by
simpa [fun i => surjInv_eq (hf i)]
using MultilinearMap.ext_iff.mp h fun i => surjInv (hf i) (x i)
theorem compLinearMap_inj (f : ∀ i, M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i))
(g₁ g₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) : g₁.compLinearMap f = g₂.compLinearMap f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
(compLinearMap_injective _ hf).eq_iff
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear equiv on each argument gives the zero map
if and only if the multilinear map is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem comp_linearEquiv_eq_zero_iff (g : MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) (f : ∀ i, M₁ i ≃ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(g.compLinearMap fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)) = 0 ↔ g = 0 := by
set f' := fun i => (f i : M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
rw [← zero_compLinearMap f', compLinearMap_inj f' fun i => (f i).surjective]
end
/-- If one adds to a vector `m'` another vector `m`, but only for coordinates in a finset `t`, then
the image under a multilinear map `f` is the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` along all subsets `s` of
`t`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when `t = univ`, given in
`map_add_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not require the index set `ι`
to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_add [DecidableEq ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) (t : Finset ι) :
f (t.piecewise (m + m') m') = ∑ s ∈ t.powerset, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
revert m'
refine Finset.induction_on t (by simp) ?_
intro i t hit Hrec m'
have A : (insert i t).piecewise (m + m') m' = update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i + m' i) :=
t.piecewise_insert _ _ _
have B : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m' i) = t.piecewise (m + m') m' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [hit]
· simp [h]
let m'' := update m' i (m i)
have C : update (t.piecewise (m + m') m') i (m i) = t.piecewise (m + m'') m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ t <;> simp [m'', h, hit, h']
rw [A, f.map_update_add, B, C, Finset.sum_powerset_insert hit, Hrec, Hrec, add_comm (_ : M₂)]
congr 1
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun s hs => ?_
have : (insert i s).piecewise m m' = s.piecewise m m'' := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [m'', Finset.not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem hs hit]
· by_cases h' : j ∈ s <;> simp [m'', h, h']
rw [this]
/-- Additivity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (m + m')` as the sum of `f (s.piecewise m m')` over all sets `s`. -/
theorem map_add_univ [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (m m' : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f (m + m') = ∑ s : Finset ι, f (s.piecewise m m') := by
simpa using f.map_piecewise_add m m' Finset.univ
section ApplySum
variable {α : ι → Type*} (g : ∀ i, α i → M₁ i) (A : ∀ i, Finset (α i))
open Fintype Finset
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. Here, we give an auxiliary statement tailored for an inductive proof. Use instead
`map_sum_finset`. -/
theorem map_sum_finset_aux [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ} (h : (∑ i, #(A i)) = n) :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
letI := fun i => Classical.decEq (α i)
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on generalizing A with | h n IH =>
-- If one of the sets is empty, then all the sums are zero
by_cases Ai_empty : ∃ i, A i = ∅
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j = 0 := Ai_empty.imp fun i hi ↦ by simp [hi]
have hpi : piFinset A = ∅ := by simpa
rw [f.map_coord_zero i hi, hpi, Finset.sum_empty]
push_neg at Ai_empty
-- Otherwise, if all sets are at most singletons, then they are exactly singletons and the result
-- is again straightforward
by_cases Ai_singleton : ∀ i, #(A i) ≤ 1
· have Ai_card : ∀ i, #(A i) = 1 := by
intro i
have pos : #(A i) ≠ 0 := by simp [Finset.card_eq_zero, Ai_empty i]
have : #(A i) ≤ 1 := Ai_singleton i
exact le_antisymm this (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (_root_.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr pos))
have :
∀ r : ∀ i, α i, r ∈ piFinset A → (f fun i => g i (r i)) = f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j := by
intro r hr
congr with i
have : ∀ j ∈ A i, g i j = g i (r i) := by
intro j hj
congr
apply Finset.card_le_one_iff.1 (Ai_singleton i) hj
exact mem_piFinset.mp hr i
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.sum_const, Ai_card i, one_nsmul]
simp only [Finset.sum_congr rfl this, Ai_card, card_piFinset, prod_const_one, one_nsmul,
Finset.sum_const]
-- Remains the interesting case where one of the `A i`, say `A i₀`, has cardinality at least 2.
-- We will split into two parts `B i₀` and `C i₀` of smaller cardinality, let `B i = C i = A i`
-- for `i ≠ i₀`, apply the inductive assumption to `B` and `C`, and add up the corresponding
-- parts to get the sum for `A`.
push_neg at Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩ : ∃ i, 1 < #(A i) := Ai_singleton
obtain ⟨j₁, j₂, _, hj₂, _⟩ : ∃ j₁ j₂, j₁ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₂ ∈ A i₀ ∧ j₁ ≠ j₂ :=
Finset.one_lt_card_iff.1 hi₀
let B := Function.update A i₀ (A i₀ \ {j₂})
let C := Function.update A i₀ {j₂}
have B_subset_A : ∀ i, B i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [B, sdiff_subset, update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
have C_subset_A : ∀ i, C i ⊆ A i := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [C, hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff, Finset.Subset.refl]
-- split the sum at `i₀` as the sum over `B i₀` plus the sum over `C i₀`, to use additivity.
have A_eq_BC :
(fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) =
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀
((∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) + ∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi, update_self]
have : A i₀ = B i₀ ∪ C i₀ := by
simp only [B, C, Function.update_self, Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union]
symm
simp only [hj₂, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.union_eq_left]
rw [this]
refine Finset.sum_union <| Finset.disjoint_right.2 fun j hj => ?_
have : j = j₂ := by
simpa [C] using hj
rw [this]
simp only [B, mem_sdiff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, not_false_iff, Finset.mem_singleton,
update_self, and_false]
· simp [hi]
have Beq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ B i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ B i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [B, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
have Ceq :
Function.update (fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) i₀ (∑ j ∈ C i₀, g i₀ j) = fun i =>
∑ j ∈ C i, g i j := by
ext i
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· rw [hi]
simp only [update_self]
· simp only [C, hi, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
-- Express the inductive assumption for `B`
have Brec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ B i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset B, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : ∑ i, #(B i) < ∑ i, #(A i) := by
refine sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => card_le_card (B_subset_A i)) ⟨i₀, mem_univ _, ?_⟩
have : {j₂} ⊆ A i₀ := by simp [hj₂]
simp only [B, Finset.card_sdiff this, Function.update_self, Finset.card_singleton]
exact Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (lt_trans Nat.zero_lt_one hi₀))
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this B rfl
-- Express the inductive assumption for `C`
have Crec : (f fun i => ∑ j ∈ C i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset C, f fun i => g i (r i) := by
have : (∑ i, #(C i)) < ∑ i, #(A i) :=
Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => Finset.card_le_card (C_subset_A i))
⟨i₀, Finset.mem_univ _, by simp [C, hi₀]⟩
rw [h] at this
exact IH _ this C rfl
have D : Disjoint (piFinset B) (piFinset C) :=
haveI : Disjoint (B i₀) (C i₀) := by simp [B, C]
piFinset_disjoint_of_disjoint B C this
have pi_BC : piFinset A = piFinset B ∪ piFinset C := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm
· intro r hr
by_cases hri₀ : r i₀ = j₂
· apply Finset.mem_union_right
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ C i₀ := by simp [C, hri₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [C, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· apply Finset.mem_union_left
refine mem_piFinset.2 fun i => ?_
by_cases hi : i = i₀
· have : r i₀ ∈ B i₀ := by simp [B, hri₀, mem_piFinset.1 hr i₀]
rwa [hi]
· simp [B, hi, mem_piFinset.1 hr i]
· exact
Finset.union_subset (piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => B_subset_A i)
(piFinset_subset _ _ fun i => C_subset_A i)
rw [A_eq_BC]
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, Beq, Ceq, Brec, Crec, pi_BC]
rw [← Finset.sum_union D]
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁ ∈ A₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ ∈ Aₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions with `r 1 ∈ A₁`, ...,
`r n ∈ Aₙ`. This follows from multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each
coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum_finset [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] :
(f fun i => ∑ j ∈ A i, g i j) = ∑ r ∈ piFinset A, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset_aux _ _ rfl
/-- If `f` is multilinear, then `f (Σ_{j₁} g₁ j₁, ..., Σ_{jₙ} gₙ jₙ)` is the sum of
`f (g₁ (r 1), ..., gₙ (r n))` where `r` ranges over all functions `r`. This follows from
multilinearity by expanding successively with respect to each coordinate. -/
theorem map_sum [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] [∀ i, Fintype (α i)] :
(f fun i => ∑ j, g i j) = ∑ r : ∀ i, α i, f fun i => g i (r i) :=
f.map_sum_finset g fun _ => Finset.univ
theorem map_update_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (t : Finset α) (i : ι) (g : α → M₁ i)
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : f (update m i (∑ a ∈ t, g a)) = ∑ a ∈ t, f (update m i (g a)) := by
classical
induction t using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, ih]
end ApplySum
/-- Restrict the codomain of a multilinear map to a submodule.
This is the multilinear version of `LinearMap.codRestrict`. -/
@[simps]
def codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ p where
toFun v := ⟨f v, h v⟩
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_add _ _ _ _ _
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := Subtype.ext <| MultilinearMap.map_update_smul _ _ _ _ _
section RestrictScalar
variable (R)
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [SMul R A] [∀ i : ι, Module A (M₁ i)] [Module A M₂]
[∀ i, IsScalarTower R A (M₁ i)] [IsScalarTower R A M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an `A`-multilinear map as an `R`-multilinear map, if `A` is an algebra over `R`
and their actions on all involved modules agree with the action of `R` on `A`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := f
map_update_add' := f.map_update_add
map_update_smul' m i := (f.toLinearMap m i).map_smul_of_tower
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : MultilinearMap A M₁ M₂) : ⇑(f.restrictScalars R) = f :=
rfl
end RestrictScalar
section
variable {ι₁ ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
/-- Transfer the arguments to a map along an equivalence between argument indices.
The naming is derived from `Finsupp.domCongr`, noting that here the permutation applies to the
domain of the domain. -/
@[simps apply]
def domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun v := m fun i => v (σ i)
map_update_add' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' v i a b := by
letI := σ.injective.decidableEq
simp_rw [Function.update_apply_equiv_apply v]
rw [m.map_update_smul]
theorem domDomCongr_trans (σ₁ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (σ₂ : ι₂ ≃ ι₃)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₁.trans σ₂) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
theorem domDomCongr_mul (σ₁ : Equiv.Perm ι₁) (σ₂ : Equiv.Perm ι₁)
(m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
m.domDomCongr (σ₂ * σ₁) = (m.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as an equivalence.
This is declared separately because it does not work with dot notation. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrEquiv (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ where
toFun := domDomCongr σ
invFun := domDomCongr σ.symm
left_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
right_inv m := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp [domDomCongr]
/-- The results of applying `domDomCongr` to two maps are equal if
and only if those maps are. -/
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_eq_iff (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (f g : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃) :
f.domDomCongr σ = g.domDomCongr σ ↔ f = g :=
(domDomCongrEquiv σ : _ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ => M₂) M₃).apply_eq_iff_eq
end
/-! If `{a // P a}` is a subtype of `ι` and if we fix an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`,
then a multilinear map on `M₁` defines a multilinear map on the restriction of `M₁` to
`{a // P a}`, by fixing the arguments out of `{a // P a}` equal to the values of `z`. -/
lemma domDomRestrict_aux {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then Function.update x i c ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h, Function.update_self]
simp only [i.2, update_self, dite_true]
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h]
by_cases h' : P j
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_true]
have h'' : ¬ ⟨j, h'⟩ = i :=
fun he => by apply_fun (fun x => x.1) at he; exact h he
rw [Function.update_of_ne h'']
· simp only [h', ne_eq, Subtype.mk.injEq, dite_false]
lemma domDomRestrict_aux_right {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] {M₁ : ι → Type*}
[DecidableEq {a // ¬ P a}]
(x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a})
(c : M₁ i) : (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else Function.update z i c ⟨j, h⟩) =
Function.update (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) i c := by
simpa only [dite_not] using domDomRestrict_aux _ z (fun j ↦ x ⟨j.1, not_not.mp j.2⟩) i c
/-- Given a multilinear map `f` on `(i : ι) → M i`, a (decidable) predicate `P` on `ι` and
an element `z` of `(i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i`, construct a multilinear map on
`(i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i)` whose value at `x` is `f` evaluated at the vector with `i`th coordinate
`x i` if `P i` and `z i` otherwise.
The naming is similar to `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr`: here we are applying the restriction to the
domain of the domain.
For a linear map version, see `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrictₗ`.
-/
def domDomRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P]
(z : (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂ where
toFun x := f (fun j ↦ if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩)
map_update_add' x i a b := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' z i c a := by
classical
repeat (rw [domDomRestrict_aux])
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul]
@[simp]
lemma domDomRestrict_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred P] (x : (i : {a // P a}) → M₁ i) (z : (i : {a // ¬ P a}) → M₁ i) :
f.domDomRestrict P z x = f (fun j => if h : P j then x ⟨j, h⟩ else z ⟨j, h⟩) := rfl
-- TODO: Should add a ref here when available.
/-- The "derivative" of a multilinear map, as a linear map from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`.
For continuous multilinear maps, this will indeed be the derivative. -/
def linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) : ((i : ι) → M₁ i) →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
∑ i : ι, (f.toLinearMap x i).comp (LinearMap.proj i)
@[simp]
lemma linearDeriv_apply [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(x y : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f.linearDeriv x y = ∑ i, f (update x i (y i)) := by
unfold linearDeriv
simp only [LinearMap.coeFn_sum, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_proj, Finset.sum_apply,
Function.comp_apply, Function.eval, toLinearMap_apply]
end Semiring
end MultilinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[AddCommMonoid M'] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M']
/-- Composing a multilinear map with a linear map gives again a multilinear map. -/
def compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g ∘ f
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_compMultilinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
⇑(g.compMultilinearMap f) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_apply (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
g.compMultilinearMap f m = g (f m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_zero (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
g.compMultilinearMap (0 : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) = 0 :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_zero g
@[simp]
theorem zero_compMultilinearMap (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).compMultilinearMap f = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_add (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (f₁ + f₂) = g.compMultilinearMap f₁ + g.compMultilinearMap f₂ :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => map_add g _ _
@[simp]
theorem add_compMultilinearMap (g₁ g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).compMultilinearMap f = g₁.compMultilinearMap f + g₂.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_smul [DistribSMul S M₂] [DistribSMul S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
g.compMultilinearMap (s • f) = s • g.compMultilinearMap f :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => g.map_smul_of_tower _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul_compMultilinearMap [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (s : S) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :
(s • g).compMultilinearMap f = s • g.compMultilinearMap f := rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.subtype_comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem subtype_compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(h) : p.subtype.compMultilinearMap (f.codRestrict p h) = f :=
rfl
/-- The multilinear version of `LinearMap.comp_codRestrict` -/
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_codRestrict (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
(p : Submodule R M₃) (h) :
(g.codRestrict p h).compMultilinearMap f =
(g.compMultilinearMap f).codRestrict p fun v => h (f v) :=
rfl
variable {ι₁ ι₂ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem compMultilinearMap_domDomCongr (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M') M₂) :
(g.compMultilinearMap f).domDomCongr σ = g.compMultilinearMap (f.domDomCongr σ) := by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr]
end LinearMap
namespace MultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [(i : ι) → AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [(i : ι) → Module R (M₁ i)]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M₂] [Module R M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] :
DistribMulAction S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.distribMulAction coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
section Module
variable [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance : Module S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.module _ coeAddMonoidHom fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors S M₂] : NoZeroSMulDivisors S (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
coe_injective.noZeroSMulDivisors _ rfl coe_smul
variable [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module S M₃] [Module R M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
variable (S) in
/-- `LinearMap.compMultilinearMap` as an `S`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.LinearMap.compMultilinearMapₗ [Semiring S] [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M₂ M₃ S R]
(g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ →ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₃ where
toFun := g.compMultilinearMap
map_add' := g.compMultilinearMap_add
map_smul' := g.compMultilinearMap_smul
variable (R S M₁ M₂ M₃)
section OfSubsingleton
/-- Linear equivalence between linear maps `M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃`
and one-multilinear maps `MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃`. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def ofSubsingletonₗ [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M₂) M₃ :=
{ ofSubsingleton R M₂ M₃ i with
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
end OfSubsingleton
/-- The dependent version of `MultilinearMap.domDomCongrLinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv' {ι' : Type*} (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun i => M₁ (σ.symm i)) M₂ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ (σ.piCongrLeft' M₁).symm
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.decidableEq
rw [← σ.apply_symm_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_symm_update, f.map_update_smul] }
invFun f :=
{ toFun := f ∘ σ.piCongrLeft' M₁
map_update_add' := fun m i => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x y
simp only [comp_apply, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_add]
map_update_smul' := fun m i c => by
letI := σ.symm.decidableEq
rw [← σ.symm_apply_apply i]
intro x
simp only [Function.comp, piCongrLeft'_update, f.map_update_smul] }
map_add' f₁ f₂ := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext
simp only [Function.comp, coe_mk, smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
left_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
right_inv f := by
ext
simp only [coe_mk, comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The space of constant maps is equivalent to the space of maps that are multilinear with respect
to an empty family. -/
@[simps]
def constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f := f 0
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := ext fun _ => MultilinearMap.congr_arg f <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrLinearEquiv {ι₁ ι₂} (σ : ι₁ ≃ ι₂) :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃ₗ[S] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃ :=
{ (domDomCongrEquiv σ :
MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₁ => M₂) M₃ ≃+ MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι₂ => M₂) M₃) with
map_smul' := fun c f => by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.domDomCongr] }
end Module
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂] (f f' : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
section
variable {M₁' : ι → Type*} [Π i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [Π i, Module R (M₁' i)]
/-- Given a predicate `P`, one may associate to a multilinear map `f` a multilinear map
from the elements satisfying `P` to the multilinear maps on elements not satisfying `P`.
In other words, splitting the variables into two subsets one gets a multilinear map into
multilinear maps.
This is a linear map version of the function `MultilinearMap.domDomRestrict`. -/
def domDomRestrictₗ (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (P : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred P] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // ¬ P a}) => M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // P a}) => M₁ i) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦ domDomRestrict f P z
map_update_add' := by
intro h m i x y
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
map_update_smul' := by
intro h m i c x
classical
ext v
simp [domDomRestrict_aux_right]
lemma iteratedFDeriv_aux {ι} {M₁ : ι → Type*} {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
(s : Set ι) [DecidableEq { x // x ∈ s }] (e : α ≃ s)
(m : α → ((i : ι) → M₁ i)) (a : α) (z : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
(fun i ↦ update m a z (e.symm i) i) =
(fun i ↦ update (fun j ↦ m (e.symm j) j) (e a) (z (e a)) i) := by
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne a (e.symm i) with rfl | hne
· rw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply e i, update_self, update_self]
· rw [update_of_ne hne.symm, update_of_ne fun h ↦ (Equiv.symm_apply_apply .. ▸ h ▸ hne) rfl]
/-- One of the components of the iterated derivative of a multilinear map. Given a bijection `e`
between a type `α` (typically `Fin k`) and a subset `s` of `ι`, this component is a multilinear map
of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ`, mapping them to `f (x₁, (v_{e.symm 2})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at
indices `i` in `s` one uses the `i`-th coordinate of the vector `v_{e.symm i}` and otherwise one
uses the `i`-th coordinate of a reference vector `x`.
This is multilinear in the components of `x` outside of `s`, and in the `v_j`. -/
noncomputable def iteratedFDerivComponent {α : Type*}
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) {s : Set ι} (e : α ≃ s) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : {a : ι // a ∉ s}) ↦ M₁ i)
(MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : α) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂) where
toFun := fun z ↦
{ toFun := fun v ↦ domDomRestrictₗ f (fun i ↦ i ∈ s) z (fun i ↦ v (e.symm i) i)
map_update_add' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux]
map_update_smul' := by classical simp [iteratedFDeriv_aux] }
map_update_add' := by intros; ext; simp
map_update_smul' := by intros; ext; simp
open Classical in
/-- The `k`-th iterated derivative of a multilinear map `f` at the point `x`. It is a multilinear
map of `k` vectors `v₁, ..., vₖ` (with the same type as `x`), mapping them
to `∑ f (x₁, (v_{i₁})₂, x₃, ...)`, where at each index `j` one uses either `xⱼ` or one
of the `(vᵢ)ⱼ`, and each `vᵢ` has to be used exactly once.
The sum is parameterized by the embeddings of `Fin k` in the index type `ι` (or, equivalently,
by the subsets `s` of `ι` of cardinality `k` and then the bijections between `Fin k` and `s`).
For the continuous version, see `ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv`. -/
protected noncomputable def iteratedFDeriv [Fintype ι]
(f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (k : ℕ) (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
MultilinearMap R (fun (_ : Fin k) ↦ (∀ i, M₁ i)) M₂ :=
∑ e : Fin k ↪ ι, iteratedFDerivComponent f e.toEquivRange (fun i ↦ x i)
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapₗ (f : Π (i : ι), M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) :
(MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
toFun := fun g ↦ g.compLinearMap f
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
/-- If `f` is a collection of linear maps, then the construction `MultilinearMap.compLinearMap`
sending a multilinear map `g` to `g (f₁ ⬝ , ..., fₙ ⬝ )` is linear in `g` and multilinear in
`f₁, ..., fₙ`. -/
@[simps] def compLinearMapMultilinear :
@MultilinearMap R ι (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i)
((MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂) →ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) _ _ _
(fun _ ↦ LinearMap.module) _ where
toFun := MultilinearMap.compLinearMapₗ
map_update_add' := by
intro _ f i f₁ f₂
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (f₁ + f₂) j <| x j) =
(g fun j ↦ update f i f₁ j <|x j) + g fun j ↦ update f i f₂ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_add (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i (f₁ (x i)) (f₂ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (f₁ + f₂) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₁ j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₂ j
map_update_smul' := by
intro _ f i a f₀
ext g x
change (g fun j ↦ update f i (a • f₀) j <| x j) = a • g fun j ↦ update f i f₀ j (x j)
let c : Π (i : ι), (M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) → M₁' i := fun i f ↦ f (x i)
convert g.map_update_smul (fun j ↦ f j (x j)) i a (f₀ (x i)) with j j j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i (a • f₀) j
· exact Function.apply_update c f i f₀ j
/--
Let `M₁ᵢ` and `M₁ᵢ'` be two families of `R`-modules and `M₂` an `R`-module.
Let us denote `Π i, M₁ᵢ` and `Π i, M₁ᵢ'` by `M` and `M'` respectively.
If `g` is a multilinear map `M' → M₂`, then `g` can be reinterpreted as a multilinear
map from `Π i, M₁ᵢ ⟶ M₁ᵢ'` to `M ⟶ M₂` via `(fᵢ) ↦ v ↦ g(fᵢ vᵢ)`.
-/
@[simps!] def piLinearMap :
MultilinearMap R M₁' M₂ →ₗ[R]
MultilinearMap R (fun i ↦ M₁ i →ₗ[R] M₁' i) (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) where
toFun g := (LinearMap.applyₗ g).compMultilinearMap compLinearMapMultilinear
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
end
/-- If one multiplies by `c i` the coordinates in a finset `s`, then the image under a multilinear
map is multiplied by `∏ i ∈ s, c i`. This is mainly an auxiliary statement to prove the result when
`s = univ`, given in `map_smul_univ`, although it can be useful in its own right as it does not
require the index set `ι` to be finite. -/
theorem map_piecewise_smul [DecidableEq ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) = (∏ i ∈ s, c i) • f m := by
refine s.induction_on (by simp) ?_
intro j s j_not_mem_s Hrec
have A :
Function.update (s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m) j (m j) =
s.piecewise (fun i => c i • m i) m := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = j
· rw [h]
simp [j_not_mem_s]
· simp [h]
rw [s.piecewise_insert, f.map_update_smul, A, Hrec]
simp [j_not_mem_s, mul_smul]
/-- Multiplicativity of a multilinear map along all coordinates at the same time,
writing `f (fun i => c i • m i)` as `(∏ i, c i) • f m`. -/
theorem map_smul_univ [Fintype ι] (c : ι → R) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
(f fun i => c i • m i) = (∏ i, c i) • f m := by
classical simpa using map_piecewise_smul f c m Finset.univ
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul_left [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
(m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update (c • m) i x) = c ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) • f (update m i x) := by
have :
f ((Finset.univ.erase i).piecewise (c • update m i x) (update m i x)) =
(∏ _i ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, c) • f (update m i x) :=
map_piecewise_smul f _ _ _
simpa [← Function.update_smul c m] using this
section
variable (R ι)
variable (A : Type*) [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Fintype ι]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebra` is the multilinear map on `A^ι` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin` for a version that works with a non-commutative
algebra `A` but requires `ι = Fin n`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebra : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => A) A where
toFun m := ∏ i, m i
map_update_add' m i x y := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem, add_mul]
map_update_smul' m i c x := by simp [Finset.prod_update_of_mem]
variable {R A ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebra_apply (m : ι → A) : MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι A m = ∏ i, m i :=
rfl
end
section
variable (R n)
variable (A : Type*) [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- Given an `R`-algebra `A`, `mkPiAlgebraFin` is the multilinear map on `A^n` associating
to `m` the product of all the `m i`.
See also `MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra` for a version that assumes `[CommSemiring A]` but works
for `A^ι` with any finite type `ι`. -/
protected def mkPiAlgebraFin : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : Fin n => A) A :=
MultilinearMap.mk' (fun m ↦ (List.ofFn m).prod)
(fun m i x y ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, add_mul, this,
mul_add, add_mul])
(fun m i c x ↦ by
have : (List.finRange n).idxOf i < n := by simp
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, (List.nodup_finRange n).map_update, List.prod_set, this])
variable {R A n}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply (m : Fin n → A) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A m = (List.ofFn m).prod :=
rfl
theorem mkPiAlgebraFin_apply_const (a : A) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin R n A fun _ => a) = a ^ n := by simp
end
/-- Given an `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smulRight z` is the map
sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
def smulRight (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ :=
(LinearMap.smulRight LinearMap.id z).compMultilinearMap f
@[simp]
theorem smulRight_apply (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ R) (z : M₂) (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) :
f.smulRight z m = f m • z :=
rfl
variable (R ι)
/-- The canonical multilinear map on `R^ι` when `ι` is finite, associating to `m` the product of
all the `m i` (multiplied by a fixed reference element `z` in the target module). See also
`mkPiAlgebra` for a more general version. -/
protected def mkPiRing [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂ :=
(MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R ι R).smulRight z
variable {R ι}
@[simp]
theorem mkPiRing_apply [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) (m : ι → R) :
(MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z : (ι → R) → M₂) m = (∏ i, m i) • z :=
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self [Fintype ι] (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂) :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (f fun _ => 1) = f := by
ext m
have : m = fun i => m i • (1 : R) := by
ext j
simp
conv_rhs => rw [this, f.map_smul_univ]
rfl
theorem mkPiRing_eq_iff [Fintype ι] {z₁ z₂ : M₂} :
MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₁ = MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z₂ ↔ z₁ = z₂ := by
simp_rw [MultilinearMap.ext_iff, mkPiRing_apply]
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using h fun _ => 1
· intro x
simp [h]
theorem mkPiRing_zero [Fintype ι] : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι (0 : M₂) = 0 := by
ext; rw [mkPiRing_apply, smul_zero, MultilinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem mkPiRing_eq_zero_iff [Fintype ι] (z : M₂) : MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
rw [← mkPiRing_zero, mkPiRing_eq_iff]
end CommSemiring
section RangeAddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f g : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
instance : Neg (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun m => -f m, fun m i x y => by simp [add_comm], fun m i c x => by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (-f) m = -f m :=
rfl
instance : Sub (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨fun m => f m - g m, fun m i x y => by
simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_add, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
abel,
fun m i c x => by simp only [MultilinearMap.map_update_smul, smul_sub]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) : (f - g) m = f m - g m :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) :=
{ MultilinearMap.addCommMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
sub_eq_add_neg := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => sub_eq_add_neg _ _
zsmul := fun n f =>
{ toFun := fun m => n • f m
map_update_add' := fun m i x y => by simp [smul_add]
map_update_smul' := fun l i x d => by simp [← smul_comm x n (_ : M₂)] }
zsmul_zero' := fun _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_zero' _
zsmul_succ' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_succ' _ _
zsmul_neg' := fun _ _ => MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => SubNegMonoid.zsmul_neg' _ _ }
end RangeAddCommGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M₁ i)] [AddCommGroup M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_update_neg [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (-x)) = -f (update m i x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by
rw [← MultilinearMap.map_update_add, neg_add_cancel, f.map_coord_zero i (update_self i 0 m)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_neg := MultilinearMap.map_update_neg
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (m : ∀ i, M₁ i) (i : ι) (x y : M₁ i) :
f (update m i (x - y)) = f (update m i x) - f (update m i y) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, MultilinearMap.map_update_add, map_update_neg]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_sub := MultilinearMap.map_update_sub
lemma map_update [DecidableEq ι] (x : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (i : ι) (v : M₁ i) :
f (update x i v) = f x - f (update x i (x i - v)) := by
rw [map_update_sub, update_eq_self, sub_sub_cancel]
open Finset in
lemma map_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f a - f (s.piecewise b a) =
∑ i ∈ s, f (fun j ↦ if j ∈ s → j < i then a j else if i = j then a j - b j else b j) := by
refine s.induction_on_min ?_ fun k s hk ih ↦ ?_
· rw [Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_empty, sub_self]
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert, map_update, ← sub_add, ih,
add_comm, sum_insert (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
simp_rw [s.mem_insert]
congr 1
· congr; ext i; split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [update_of_ne, Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
· exact fun h ↦ (hk i h).not_lt (h₁ <| .inr h)
· exact fun h ↦ (h₁ <| .inl h).ne h
· cases h₂
rw [update_self, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ (lt_irrefl _ <| hk k ·)]
· push_neg at h₁
rw [update_of_ne (Ne.symm h₂), s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ (h₁.1.resolve_left <| Ne.symm h₂)]
· apply sum_congr rfl; intro i hi; congr; ext j; congr 1; apply propext
simp_rw [imp_iff_not_or, not_or]; apply or_congr_left'
intro h; rw [and_iff_right]; rintro rfl; exact h (hk i hi)
/-- This calculates the differences between the values of a multilinear map at
two arguments that differ on a finset `s` of `ι`. It requires a
linear order on `ι` in order to express the result. -/
lemma map_piecewise_sub_map_piecewise [LinearOrder ι] (a b v : (i : ι) → M₁ i) (s : Finset ι) :
f (s.piecewise a v) - f (s.piecewise b v) = ∑ i ∈ s, f
fun j ↦ if j ∈ s then if j < i then a j else if j = i then a j - b j else b j else v j := by
rw [← s.piecewise_idem_right b a, map_sub_map_piecewise]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg f <| funext fun j ↦ ?_
by_cases hjs : j ∈ s
· rw [if_pos hjs]; by_cases hji : j < i
· rw [if_pos fun _ ↦ hji, if_pos hji, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hjs]
rw [if_neg (Classical.not_imp.mpr ⟨hjs, hji⟩), if_neg hji]
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· rw [if_pos rfl, if_pos rfl, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hi]
· rw [if_neg hij, if_neg hij.symm]
· rw [if_neg hjs, if_pos fun h ↦ (hjs h).elim, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ hjs]
open Finset in
lemma map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) = f x + f.linearDeriv x h + ∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, f (s.piecewise h x) := by
rw [add_comm, map_add_univ, ← Finset.powerset_univ,
← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not _ (2 ≤ #·)]
simp_rw [not_le, Nat.lt_succ, le_iff_lt_or_eq (b := 1), Nat.lt_one_iff, filter_or,
← powersetCard_eq_filter, sum_union (univ.pairwise_disjoint_powersetCard zero_ne_one),
powersetCard_zero, powersetCard_one, sum_singleton, Finset.piecewise_empty, sum_map,
Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Finset.piecewise_singleton, linearDeriv_apply, add_comm]
open Finset in
/-- This expresses the difference between the values of a multilinear map
at two points "close to `x`" in terms of the "derivative" of the multilinear map at `x`
and of "second-order" terms. -/
lemma map_add_sub_map_add_sub_linearDeriv [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (x h h' : (i : ι) → M₁ i) :
f (x + h) - f (x + h') - f.linearDeriv x (h - h') =
∑ s with 2 ≤ #s, (f (s.piecewise h x) - f (s.piecewise h' x)) := by
simp_rw [map_add_eq_map_add_linearDeriv_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_comm, sub_self, zero_add,
← LinearMap.map_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, sum_sub_distrib]
end AddCommGroup
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)]
[Module R M₂]
/-- When `ι` is finite, multilinear maps on `R^ι` with values in `M₂` are in bijection with `M₂`,
as such a multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of ones.
We register this bijection as a linear equivalence in `MultilinearMap.piRingEquiv`. -/
protected def piRingEquiv [Fintype ι] : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => R) M₂ where
toFun z := MultilinearMap.mkPiRing R ι z
invFun f := f fun _ => 1
map_add' z z' := by
ext m
simp [smul_add]
map_smul' c z := by
ext m
simp [smul_smul, mul_comm]
left_inv z := by simp
right_inv f := f.mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self
end CommSemiring
section Submodule
variable [Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M'] [Module R M₂]
/-- The pushforward of an indexed collection of submodule `p i ⊆ M₁ i` by `f : M₁ → M₂`.
Note that this is not a submodule - it is not closed under addition. -/
def map [Nonempty ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : ∀ i, Submodule R (M₁ i)) :
SubMulAction R M₂ where
carrier := f '' { v | ∀ i, v i ∈ p i }
smul_mem' := fun c _ ⟨x, hx, hf⟩ => by
let ⟨i⟩ := ‹Nonempty ι›
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine ⟨update x i (c • x i), fun j => if hij : j = i then ?_ else ?_, hf ▸ ?_⟩
· rw [hij, update_self]
exact (p i).smul_mem _ (hx i)
· rw [update_of_ne hij]
exact hx j
· rw [f.map_update_smul, update_eq_self]
/-- The map is always nonempty. This lemma is needed to apply `SubMulAction.zero_mem`. -/
theorem map_nonempty [Nonempty ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (p : ∀ i, Submodule R (M₁ i)) :
(map f p : Set M₂).Nonempty :=
⟨f 0, 0, fun i => (p i).zero_mem, rfl⟩
/-- The range of a multilinear map, closed under scalar multiplication. -/
def range [Nonempty ι] (f : MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) : SubMulAction R M₂ :=
f.map fun _ => ⊤
end Submodule
end MultilinearMap
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 1,827 | 1,836 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ : ℝ) {r₂ : ℝ} (hr₂ : r₂ ≠ 0) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_ball_zero_iff,
map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r₁]
refine mul_lt_mul' hb ha (norm_nonneg _) (hr₂.lt_or_lt.resolve_left ?_)
exact ((apply_nonneg p b).trans hb).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
rcases eq_or_ne r₂ 0 with rfl | hr₂
· simp
· exact (smul_subset_smul_left (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _)).trans
(ball_smul_closedBall _ _ hr₂)
theorem closedBall_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
gcongr
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans ha
theorem neg_mem_ball_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ x ∈ ball p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_ball_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
theorem neg_mem_closedBall_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ x ∈ closedBall p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) : -ball p x r = ball p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_ball, mem_ball, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
-closedBall p x r = closedBall p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
end Module
end AddCommGroup
end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r : ℝ} {x : E}
theorem closedBall_iSup {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) (e : E)
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (⨆ i, p i) e r = ⋂ i, closedBall (p i) e r := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iSup_of_empty', iInter_of_empty, Seminorm.sSup_empty]
exact closedBall_bot _ hr
· ext x
have := Seminorm.bddAbove_range_iff.mp hp (x - e)
simp only [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter, Seminorm.iSup_apply hp, ciSup_le_iff this]
theorem ball_norm_mul_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) ⊆ k • p.ball 0 r := by
rcases eq_or_ne k 0 with (rfl | hk)
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, ball_eq_emptyset _ le_rfl]
exact empty_subset _
· intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_ball_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ←
mul_lt_mul_left <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk, ← mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖,
div_self (ne_of_gt <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self hk, one_smul]
theorem smul_ball_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
k • p.ball 0 r = p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
ext
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hk, p.mem_ball_zero, p.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul,
norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hk), mul_comm]
theorem smul_closedBall_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
k • p.closedBall 0 r ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, ← h, map_smul_eq_mul]
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
gcongr
theorem smul_closedBall_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : 0 < ‖k‖) :
k • p.closedBall 0 r = p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
refine subset_antisymm smul_closedBall_subset ?_
intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ← mul_le_mul_left hk, ← mul_assoc,
← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖, div_self (ne_of_gt hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self (norm_pos_iff.mp hk), one_smul]
theorem ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 < r₁) :
Absorbs 𝕜 (p.ball 0 r₁) (p.ball 0 r₂) := by
rcases exists_pos_lt_mul hr₁ r₂ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
refine .of_norm ⟨r, fun a ha x hx => ?_⟩
rw [smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr₀.trans_le ha), p.mem_ball_zero]
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hx
exact hx.trans (hr.trans_le <| by gcongr)
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p (0 : E) r) :=
absorbent_iff_forall_absorbs_singleton.2 fun _ =>
(p.ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr).mono_right <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 <| p.mem_ball_zero.2 <| lt_add_one _
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p (0 : E) r) :=
(p.absorbent_ball_zero hr).mono (p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_ball_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_ball.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_of_lt_sub_right hy)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_closedBall_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_closedBall.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans <| add_le_of_le_sub_right hy)
@[simp]
theorem smul_ball_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.ball y r = p.ball (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_ball, mem_ball, lt_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem smul_closedBall_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
end NormedField
section Convex
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E]
section SMul
variable [SMul ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- A seminorm is convex. Also see `convexOn_norm`. -/
protected theorem convexOn : ConvexOn ℝ univ p := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb _ => ?_⟩
calc
p (a • x + b • y) ≤ p (a • x) + p (b • y) := map_add_le_add p _ _
_ = ‖a • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p x + ‖b • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p y := by
rw [← map_smul_eq_mul p, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_one_smul, smul_one_smul]
_ = a * p x + b * p y := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one, mul_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg ha,
Real.norm_of_nonneg hb]
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Seminorm-balls are convex. -/
theorem convex_ball : Convex ℝ (ball p x r) := by
convert (p.convexOn.translate_left (-x)).convex_lt r
ext y
rw [preimage_univ, sep_univ, p.mem_ball, sub_eq_add_neg]
rfl
/-- Closed seminorm-balls are convex. -/
theorem convex_closedBall : Convex ℝ (closedBall p x r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_biInter_ball]
exact convex_iInter₂ fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _ _
end Module
end Convex
section RestrictScalars
|
variable (𝕜) {𝕜' : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedRing 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜']
[NormOneClass 𝕜'] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜' E] [SMul 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' E]
/-- Reinterpret a seminorm over a field `𝕜'` as a seminorm over a smaller field `𝕜`. This will
typically be used with `RCLike 𝕜'` and `𝕜 = ℝ`. -/
protected def restrictScalars (p : Seminorm 𝕜' E) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p with
smul' := fun a x => by rw [← smul_one_smul 𝕜' a x, p.smul', norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one] }
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 1,014 | 1,022 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jon Eugster. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jon Eugster
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Equal and mixed characteristic
In commutative algebra, some statements are simpler when working over a `ℚ`-algebra `R`, in which
case one also says that the ring has "equal characteristic zero". A ring that is not a
`ℚ`-algebra has either positive characteristic or there exists a prime ideal `I ⊂ R` such that
the quotient `R ⧸ I` has positive characteristic `p > 0`. In this case one speaks of
"mixed characteristic `(0, p)`", where `p` is only unique if `R` is local.
Examples of mixed characteristic rings are `ℤ` or the `p`-adic integers/numbers.
This file provides the main theorem `split_by_characteristic` that splits any proposition `P` into
the following three cases:
1) Positive characteristic: `CharP R p` (where `p ≠ 0`)
2) Equal characteristic zero: `Algebra ℚ R`
3) Mixed characteristic: `MixedCharZero R p` (where `p` is prime)
## Main definitions
- `MixedCharZero` : A ring has mixed characteristic `(0, p)` if it has characteristic zero
and there exists an ideal such that the quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic `p`.
## Main results
- `split_equalCharZero_mixedCharZero` : Split a statement into equal/mixed characteristic zero.
This main theorem has the following three corollaries which include the positive
characteristic case for convenience:
- `split_by_characteristic` : Generally consider positive char `p ≠ 0`.
- `split_by_characteristic_domain` : In a domain we can assume that `p` is prime.
- `split_by_characteristic_localRing` : In a local ring we can assume that `p` is a prime power.
## Implementation Notes
We use the terms `EqualCharZero` and `AlgebraRat` despite not being such definitions in mathlib.
The former refers to the statement `∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)`, the latter
refers to the existence of an instance `[Algebra ℚ R]`. The two are shown to be
equivalent conditions.
## TODO
- Relate mixed characteristic in a local ring to p-adic numbers [NumberTheory.PAdics].
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-!
### Mixed characteristic
-/
/--
A ring of characteristic zero is of "mixed characteristic `(0, p)`" if there exists an ideal
such that the quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic `p`.
**Remark:** For `p = 0`, `MixedChar R 0` is a meaningless definition (i.e. satisfied by any ring)
as `R ⧸ ⊥ ≅ R` has by definition always characteristic zero.
One could require `(I ≠ ⊥)` in the definition, but then `MixedChar R 0` would mean something
like `ℤ`-algebra of extension degree `≥ 1` and would be completely independent from
whether something is a `ℚ`-algebra or not (e.g. `ℚ[X]` would satisfy it but `ℚ` wouldn't).
-/
class MixedCharZero (p : ℕ) : Prop where
[toCharZero : CharZero R]
charP_quotient : ∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p
namespace MixedCharZero
/--
Reduction to `p` prime: When proving any statement `P` about mixed characteristic rings we
can always assume that `p` is prime.
-/
theorem reduce_to_p_prime {P : Prop} :
(∀ p > 0, MixedCharZero R p → P) ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → MixedCharZero R p → P := by
constructor
· intro h q q_prime q_mixedChar
exact h q (Nat.Prime.pos q_prime) q_mixedChar
· intro h q q_pos q_mixedChar
rcases q_mixedChar.charP_quotient with ⟨I, hI_ne_top, _⟩
-- Krull's Thm: There exists a prime ideal `P` such that `I ≤ P`
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI_ne_top with ⟨M, hM_max, h_IM⟩
let r := ringChar (R ⧸ M)
have r_pos : r ≠ 0 := by
have q_zero :=
congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.factor h_IM) (CharP.cast_eq_zero (R ⧸ I) q)
simp only [map_natCast, map_zero] at q_zero
apply ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero (ne_of_gt q_pos)
exact (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (R ⧸ M) r q).mp q_zero
have r_prime : Nat.Prime r :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero (R ⧸ M) r) r_pos
apply h r r_prime
have : CharZero R := q_mixedChar.toCharZero
exact ⟨⟨M, hM_max.ne_top, ringChar.of_eq rfl⟩⟩
/--
Reduction to `I` prime ideal: When proving statements about mixed characteristic rings,
after we reduced to `p` prime, we can assume that the ideal `I` in the definition is maximal.
-/
theorem reduce_to_maximal_ideal {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) :
(∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p) ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, I.IsMaximal ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p := by
constructor
· intro g
rcases g with ⟨I, ⟨hI_not_top, _⟩⟩
-- Krull's Thm: There exists a prime ideal `M` such that `I ≤ M`.
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI_not_top with ⟨M, ⟨hM_max, hM_ge⟩⟩
use M
constructor
· exact hM_max
· cases CharP.exists (R ⧸ M) with
| intro r hr =>
convert hr
have r_dvd_p : r ∣ p := by
rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (R ⧸ M) r p]
convert congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.factor hM_ge) (CharP.cast_eq_zero (R ⧸ I) p)
symm
apply (Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd hp r r_dvd_p).resolve_left
exact CharP.char_ne_one (R ⧸ M) r
· intro ⟨I, hI_max, h_charP⟩
use I
exact ⟨Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top hI_max, h_charP⟩
end MixedCharZero
/-!
### Equal characteristic zero
A commutative ring `R` has "equal characteristic zero" if it satisfies one of the following
equivalent properties:
1) `R` is a `ℚ`-algebra.
2) The quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic zero for any proper ideal `I ⊂ R`.
3) `R` has characteristic zero and does not have mixed characteristic for any prime `p`.
We show `(1) ↔ (2) ↔ (3)`, and most of the following is concerned with constructing
an explicit algebra map `ℚ →+* R` (given by `x ↦ (x.num : R) /ₚ ↑x.pnatDen`)
for the direction `(1) ← (2)`.
Note: Property `(2)` is denoted as `EqualCharZero` in the statement names below.
-/
namespace EqualCharZero
/-- `ℚ`-algebra implies equal characteristic. -/
theorem of_algebraRat [Algebra ℚ R] : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI
constructor
intro a b h_ab
contrapose! hI
-- `↑a - ↑b` is a unit contained in `I`, which contradicts `I ≠ ⊤`.
refine I.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem ?_ (IsUnit.map (algebraMap ℚ R) (IsUnit.mk0 (a - b : ℚ) ?_))
· simpa only [← Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_natCast]
simpa only [Ne, sub_eq_zero] using (@Nat.cast_injective ℚ _ _).ne hI
section ConstructionAlgebraRat
variable {R}
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
theorem PNat.isUnit_natCast [h : Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))]
(n : ℕ+) : IsUnit (n : R) := by
-- `n : R` is a unit iff `(n)` is not a proper ideal in `R`.
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
-- So by contrapositive, we should show the quotient does not have characteristic zero.
apply not_imp_comm.mp (h.elim (Ideal.span {↑n}))
intro h_char_zero
-- In particular, the image of `n` in the quotient should be nonzero.
apply h_char_zero.cast_injective.ne n.ne_zero
-- But `n` generates the ideal, so its image is clearly zero.
rw [← map_natCast (Ideal.Quotient.mk _), Nat.cast_zero, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact Ideal.subset_span (Set.mem_singleton _)
@[coe]
noncomputable def pnatCast [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : ℕ+ → Rˣ :=
fun n => (PNat.isUnit_natCast n).unit
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
noncomputable instance coePNatUnits
[Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : Coe ℕ+ Rˣ :=
⟨EqualCharZero.pnatCast⟩
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
@[simp]
theorem pnatCast_one [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : ((1 : ℕ+) : Rˣ) = 1 := by
apply Units.ext
rw [Units.val_one]
change ((PNat.isUnit_natCast (R := R) 1).unit : R) = 1
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec (PNat.isUnit_natCast 1)]
rw [PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one]
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
@[simp]
theorem pnatCast_eq_natCast [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] (n : ℕ+) :
((n : Rˣ) : R) = ↑n := by
change ((PNat.isUnit_natCast (R := R) n).unit : R) = ↑n
simp only [IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- Equal characteristic implies `ℚ`-algebra. -/
noncomputable def algebraRat (h : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) :
Algebra ℚ R :=
haveI : Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) := ⟨h⟩
RingHom.toAlgebra
{ toFun := fun x => x.num /ₚ ↑x.pnatDen
map_zero' := by simp [divp]
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by
intro a b
field_simp
trans (↑((a * b).num * a.den * b.den) : R)
· simp_rw [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
ring
rw [Rat.mul_num_den' a b]
simp
map_add' := by
intro a b
field_simp
trans (↑((a + b).num * a.den * b.den) : R)
· simp_rw [Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
ring
rw [Rat.add_num_den' a b]
simp }
end ConstructionAlgebraRat
/-- Not mixed characteristic implies equal characteristic. -/
theorem of_not_mixedCharZero [CharZero R] (h : ∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p) :
∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI_ne_top
suffices CharP (R ⧸ I) 0 from CharP.charP_to_charZero _
cases CharP.exists (R ⧸ I) with
| intro p hp =>
cases p with
| zero => exact hp
| succ p =>
have h_mixed : MixedCharZero R p.succ := ⟨⟨I, ⟨hI_ne_top, hp⟩⟩⟩
exact absurd h_mixed (h p.succ p.succ_pos)
/-- Equal characteristic implies not mixed characteristic. -/
| theorem to_not_mixedCharZero (h : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)) :
∀ p > 0, ¬MixedCharZero R p := by
intro p p_pos
by_contra hp_mixedChar
rcases hp_mixedChar.charP_quotient with ⟨I, hI_ne_top, hI_p⟩
replace hI_zero : CharP (R ⧸ I) 0 := @CharP.ofCharZero _ _ (h I hI_ne_top)
exact absurd (CharP.eq (R ⧸ I) hI_p hI_zero) (ne_of_gt p_pos)
/--
A ring of characteristic zero has equal characteristic iff it does not
have mixed characteristic for any `p`.
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/MixedCharZero.lean | 247 | 257 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LocallyConvex
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `SeminormFamily.basisSets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `Seminorm.IsBounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
* `WithSeminorms.firstCountable`: A space is first countable if it's topology is induced by a
countable family of seminorms.
## Continuity of semilinear maps
If `E` and `F` are topological vector space with the topology induced by a family of seminorms, then
we have a direct method to prove that a linear map is continuous:
* `Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
If the topology of a space `E` is induced by a family of seminorms, then we can characterize von
Neumann boundedness in terms of that seminorm family. Together with
`LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded` this gives general criterion for continuity.
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open NormedField Set Seminorm TopologicalSpace Filter List
open NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕝 𝕝₂ E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section FilterBasis
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbrev SeminormFamily :=
ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E
variable {𝕜 E ι}
namespace SeminormFamily
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basisSets (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : Set (Set E) :=
⋃ (s : Finset ι) (r) (_ : 0 < r), singleton (ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r)
variable (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
theorem basisSets_iff {U : Set E} :
U ∈ p.basisSets ↔ ∃ (i : Finset ι) (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r := by
simp only [basisSets, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
theorem basisSets_mem (i : Finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨i, _, hr, rfl⟩
theorem basisSets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i}, _, hr, by rw [Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
theorem basisSets_nonempty [Nonempty ι] : p.basisSets.Nonempty := by
let i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, ?_⟩
exact p.basisSets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one
theorem basisSets_intersect (U V : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) (hV : V ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ z ∈ p.basisSets, z ⊆ U ∩ V := by
classical
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), ?_⟩
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₂]
exact
Set.subset_inter
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_left hi, ball_mono <| min_le_left _ _⟩)
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_right hi, ball_mono <| min_le_right _ _⟩)
theorem basisSets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : (0 : E) ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero]
exact hr
theorem basisSets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V + V ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / 2)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r / 2) (r / 2) 0 0) ?_
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves]
theorem basisSets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V ⊆ (fun x : E => -x) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, _, hU⟩
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero]
exact ⟨U, hU', Eq.subset hU⟩
/-- The `addGroupFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def addGroupFilterBasis [Nonempty ι] : AddGroupFilterBasis E :=
addGroupFilterBasisOfComm p.basisSets p.basisSets_nonempty p.basisSets_intersect p.basisSets_zero
p.basisSets_add p.basisSets_neg
theorem basisSets_smul_right (v : E) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∀ᶠ x : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, Filter.eventually_iff]
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v
· simp_rw [(lt_div_iff₀ h).symm]
rw [← _root_.ball_zero_eq]
exact Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h)
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) (apply_nonneg _ v), mul_zero, hr]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ (mem_univ 0)
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem basisSets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), ∃ W ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V • W ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
refine ⟨Metric.ball 0 √r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 √r, p.basisSets_mem s (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) √r √r) ?_
rw [hU, Real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)]
theorem basisSets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V ⊆ (fun y : E => x • y) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU]
by_cases h : x ≠ 0
· rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero]
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ‖x‖)
exact ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), Subset.rfl⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_mem s hr, ?_⟩
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, Set.subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero, imp_true_iff,
preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul]
/-- The `moduleFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def moduleFilterBasis : ModuleFilterBasis 𝕜 E where
toAddGroupFilterBasis := p.addGroupFilterBasis
smul' := p.basisSets_smul _
smul_left' := p.basisSets_smul_left
smul_right' := p.basisSets_smul_right
theorem filter_eq_iInf (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i => ?_) ?_
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.le_basis_iff
(Metric.nhds_basis_ball.comap _)]
intro ε hε
refine ⟨(p i).ball 0 ε, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← (Finset.sup_singleton : _ = p i)]
exact p.basisSets_mem {i} hε
· rw [id, (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball]
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.ge_iff]
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [id, Seminorm.ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, s.iInter_mem_sets]
exact fun i _ =>
Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem i
⟨Metric.ball 0 r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 hr,
Eq.subset (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball.symm⟩
/-- If a family of seminorms is continuous, then their basis sets are neighborhoods of zero. -/
lemma basisSets_mem_nhds {𝕜 E ι : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(hp : ∀ i, Continuous (p i)) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) := by
obtain ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩ := p.basisSets_iff.mp hU
clear hU
refine Seminorm.ball_mem_nhds ?_ hr
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on
case empty => simpa using continuous_zero
case insert a s _ hs =>
simp only [Finset.sup_insert, coe_sup]
exact Continuous.max (hp a) hs
end SeminormFamily
end FilterBasis
section Bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
-- Todo: This should be phrased entirely in terms of the von Neumann bornology.
/-- The proposition that a linear map is bounded between spaces with families of seminorms. -/
def IsBounded (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : Prop :=
∀ i, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p
theorem isBounded_const (ι' : Type*) [Nonempty ι'] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
IsBounded p (fun _ : ι' => q) f ↔ ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), q.comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
simp only [IsBounded, forall_const]
theorem const_isBounded (ι : Type*) [Nonempty ι] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : IsBounded (fun _ : ι => p) q f ↔ ∀ i, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • p := by
constructor <;> intro h i
· rcases h i with ⟨s, C, h⟩
exact ⟨C, le_trans h (smul_le_smul (Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) le_rfl)⟩
use {Classical.arbitrary ι}
simp only [h, Finset.sup_singleton]
theorem isBounded_sup {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F} {f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F}
(hf : IsBounded p q f) (s' : Finset ι') :
∃ (C : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset ι), (s'.sup q).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
classical
obtain rfl | _ := s'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨1, ∅, by simp [Seminorm.bot_eq_zero]⟩
choose fₛ fC hf using hf
use s'.card • s'.sup fC, Finset.biUnion s' fₛ
have hs : ∀ i : ι', i ∈ s' → (q i).comp f ≤ s'.sup fC • (Finset.biUnion s' fₛ).sup p := by
intro i hi
refine (hf i).trans (smul_le_smul ?_ (Finset.le_sup hi))
exact Finset.sup_mono (Finset.subset_biUnion_of_mem fₛ hi)
refine (comp_mono f (finset_sup_le_sum q s')).trans ?_
simp_rw [← pullback_apply, map_sum, pullback_apply]
refine (Finset.sum_le_sum hs).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_assoc]
end Seminorm
end Bounded
section Topology
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
/-- The proposition that the topology of `E` is induced by a family of seminorms `p`. -/
structure WithSeminorms (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) [topology : TopologicalSpace E] : Prop where
topology_eq_withSeminorms : topology = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology
theorem WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [t : TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) : t = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology :=
hp.1
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
theorem WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup (hp : WithSeminorms p) : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup _
theorem WithSeminorms.continuousSMul (hp : WithSeminorms p) : ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact ModuleFilterBasis.continuousSMul _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id := by
rw [congr_fun (congr_arg (@nhds E) hp.1) 0]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball 0 sr.2 := by
refine ⟨fun V => ?_⟩
simp only [hp.hasBasis.mem_iff, SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff, Prod.exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
exact ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
· rintro ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) {x : E} :
(𝓝 (x : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball x sr.2 := by
have : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [← map_add_left_nhds_zero]
convert hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.map (x + ·) using 1
ext sr : 1
-- Porting note: extra type ascriptions needed on `0`
have : (sr.fst.sup p).ball (x +ᵥ (0 : E)) sr.snd = x +ᵥ (sr.fst.sup p).ball 0 sr.snd :=
Eq.symm (Seminorm.vadd_ball (sr.fst.sup p))
rwa [vadd_eq_add, add_zero] at this
/-- The `x`-neighbourhoods of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around `x`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (U : Set E) :
U ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
rw [hp.hasBasis_ball.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
/-- The open sets of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around all of their points. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls (hp : WithSeminorms p) (U : Set E) :
IsOpen U ↔ ∀ x ∈ U, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
simp_rw [← WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff hp _ U, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
/- Note that through the following lemmas, one also immediately has that separating families
of seminorms induce T₂ and T₃ topologies by `IsTopologicalAddGroup.t2Space`
and `IsTopologicalAddGroup.t3Space` -/
/-- A separating family of seminorms induces a T₁ topology. -/
| theorem WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(h : ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) : T1Space E := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/WithSeminorms.lean | 324 | 326 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Hom
/-!
# Congruence relations
This file proves basic properties of the quotient of a type by a congruence relation.
The second half of the file concerns congruence relations on monoids, in which case the
quotient by the congruence relation is also a monoid. There are results about the universal
property of quotients of monoids, and the isomorphism theorems for monoids.
## Implementation notes
A congruence relation on a monoid `M` can be thought of as a submonoid of `M × M` for which
membership is an equivalence relation, but whilst this fact is established in the file, it is not
used, since this perspective adds more layers of definitional unfolding.
## Tags
congruence, congruence relation, quotient, quotient by congruence relation, monoid,
quotient monoid, isomorphism theorems
-/
variable (M : Type*) {N : Type*} {P : Type*}
open Function Setoid
variable {M}
namespace Con
section
variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (c : Con M)
variable {c}
/-- Given types with multiplications `M, N`, the product of two congruence relations `c` on `M` and
`d` on `N`: `(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ M × N` are related by `c.prod d` iff `x₁` is related to `y₁`
by `c` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `d`. -/
@[to_additive prod "Given types with additions `M, N`, the product of two congruence relations
`c` on `M` and `d` on `N`: `(x₁, x₂), (y₁, y₂) ∈ M × N` are related by `c.prod d` iff `x₁`
is related to `y₁` by `c` and `x₂` is related to `y₂` by `d`."]
protected def prod (c : Con M) (d : Con N) : Con (M × N) :=
{ c.toSetoid.prod d.toSetoid with
mul' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.mul h1.1 h2.1, d.mul h1.2 h2.2⟩ }
/-- The product of an indexed collection of congruence relations. -/
@[to_additive "The product of an indexed collection of additive congruence relations."]
def pi {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Mul (f i)] (C : ∀ i, Con (f i)) : Con (∀ i, f i) :=
{ @piSetoid _ _ fun i => (C i).toSetoid with
mul' := fun h1 h2 i => (C i).mul (h1 i) (h2 i) }
/-- Makes an isomorphism of quotients by two congruence relations, given that the relations are
equal. -/
@[to_additive "Makes an additive isomorphism of quotients by two additive congruence relations,
given that the relations are equal."]
protected def congr {c d : Con M} (h : c = d) : c.Quotient ≃* d.Quotient :=
{ Quotient.congr (Equiv.refl M) <| by apply Con.ext_iff.mp h with
map_mul' := fun x y => by rcases x with ⟨⟩; rcases y with ⟨⟩; rfl }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem congr_mk {c d : Con M} (h : c = d) (a : M) :
Con.congr h (a : c.Quotient) = (a : d.Quotient) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_comap_conGen {M N : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N)
(H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (rel : N → N → Prop) :
conGen (fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) ≤ Con.comap f H (conGen rel) := by
intro x y h
simp only [Con.comap_rel]
exact .rec (fun x y h ↦ .of (f x) (f y) h) (fun x ↦ .refl (f x))
(fun _ h ↦ .symm h) (fun _ _ h1 h2 ↦ h1.trans h2) (fun {w x y z} _ _ h1 h2 ↦
(congrArg (fun a ↦ conGen rel a (f (x * z))) (H w y)).mpr
(((congrArg (fun a ↦ conGen rel (f w * f y) a) (H x z))).mpr
(.mul h1 h2))) h
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_conGen_equiv {M N : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : MulEquiv M N) (rel : N → N → Prop) :
Con.comap f (map_mul f) (conGen rel) = conGen (fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (le_comap_conGen f (map_mul f) rel)
intro a b h
simp only [Con.comap_rel] at h
have H : ∀ n1 n2, (conGen rel) n1 n2 → ∀ a b, f a = n1 → f b = n2 →
(conGen fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) a b := by
intro n1 n2 h
induction h with
| of x y h =>
intro _ _ fa fb
apply ConGen.Rel.of
rwa [fa, fb]
| refl x =>
intro _ _ fc fd
rw [f.injective (fc.trans fd.symm)]
exact ConGen.Rel.refl _
| symm _ h => exact fun a b fs fb ↦ ConGen.Rel.symm (h b a fb fs)
| trans _ _ ih ih1 =>
exact fun a b fa fb ↦ Exists.casesOn (f.surjective _) fun c' hc' ↦
ConGen.Rel.trans (ih a c' fa hc') (ih1 c' b hc' fb)
| mul _ _ ih ih1 =>
rename_i w x y z _ _
intro a b fa fb
rw [← f.eq_symm_apply, map_mul] at fa fb
rw [fa, fb]
exact ConGen.Rel.mul (ih (f.symm w) (f.symm x) (by simp) (by simp))
(ih1 (f.symm y) (f.symm z) (by simp) (by simp))
exact H (f a) (f b) h a b (refl _) (refl _)
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_conGen_of_bijective {M N : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N)
(hf : Function.Bijective f) (H : ∀ (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y) (rel : N → N → Prop) :
Con.comap f H (conGen rel) = conGen (fun x y ↦ rel (f x) (f y)) :=
comap_conGen_equiv (MulEquiv.ofBijective (MulHom.mk f H) hf) rel
end
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (c : Con M)
/-- The submonoid of `M × M` defined by a congruence relation on a monoid `M`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe) "The `AddSubmonoid` of `M × M` defined by an additive congruence
relation on an `AddMonoid` `M`."]
protected def submonoid : Submonoid (M × M) where
carrier := { x | c x.1 x.2 }
one_mem' := c.iseqv.1 1
mul_mem' := c.mul
variable {c}
/-- The congruence relation on a monoid `M` from a submonoid of `M × M` for which membership
is an equivalence relation. -/
@[to_additive "The additive congruence relation on an `AddMonoid` `M` from
an `AddSubmonoid` of `M × M` for which membership is an equivalence relation."]
def ofSubmonoid (N : Submonoid (M × M)) (H : Equivalence fun x y => (x, y) ∈ N) : Con M where
r x y := (x, y) ∈ N
iseqv := H
mul' := N.mul_mem
/-- Coercion from a congruence relation `c` on a monoid `M` to the submonoid of `M × M` whose
elements are `(x, y)` such that `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
@[to_additive "Coercion from a congruence relation `c` on an `AddMonoid` `M`
to the `AddSubmonoid` of `M × M` whose elements are `(x, y)` such that `x`
is related to `y` by `c`."]
instance toSubmonoid : Coe (Con M) (Submonoid (M × M)) :=
⟨fun c => c.submonoid⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_coe {c : Con M} {x y} : (x, y) ∈ (↑c : Submonoid (M × M)) ↔ (x, y) ∈ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem to_submonoid_inj (c d : Con M) (H : (c : Submonoid (M × M)) = d) : c = d :=
ext fun x y => show (x, y) ∈ c.submonoid ↔ (x, y) ∈ d from H ▸ Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_iff {c d : Con M} : c ≤ d ↔ (c : Submonoid (M × M)) ≤ d :=
⟨fun h _ H => h H, fun h x y hc => h <| show (x, y) ∈ c from hc⟩
variable (x y : M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
-- Porting note: removed dot notation
theorem mrange_mk' : MonoidHom.mrange c.mk' = ⊤ :=
MonoidHom.mrange_eq_top.2 mk'_surjective
variable {f : M →* P}
/-- Given a congruence relation `c` on a monoid and a homomorphism `f` constant on `c`'s
equivalence classes, `f` has the same image as the homomorphism that `f` induces on the
quotient. -/
@[to_additive "Given an additive congruence relation `c` on an `AddMonoid` and a homomorphism `f`
constant on `c`'s equivalence classes, `f` has the same image as the homomorphism that `f` induces
on the quotient."]
theorem lift_range (H : c ≤ ker f) : MonoidHom.mrange (c.lift f H) = MonoidHom.mrange f :=
Submonoid.ext fun x => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟨y⟩, hy⟩; exact ⟨y, hy⟩, fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => ⟨↑y, hy⟩⟩
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f`, the induced homomorphism on the quotient by `f`'s kernel has
the same image as `f`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Given an `AddMonoid` homomorphism `f`, the induced homomorphism
on the quotient by `f`'s kernel has the same image as `f`."]
theorem kerLift_range_eq : MonoidHom.mrange (kerLift f) = MonoidHom.mrange f :=
lift_range fun _ _ => id
variable (c)
/-- The **first isomorphism theorem for monoids**. -/
@[to_additive "The first isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s."]
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivRange (f : M →* P) : (ker f).Quotient ≃* MonoidHom.mrange f :=
{ Equiv.ofBijective
((@MulEquiv.toMonoidHom (MonoidHom.mrange (kerLift f)) _ _ _ <|
MulEquiv.submonoidCongr kerLift_range_eq).comp
(kerLift f).mrangeRestrict) <|
((Equiv.bijective (@MulEquiv.toEquiv (MonoidHom.mrange (kerLift f)) _ _ _ <|
MulEquiv.submonoidCongr kerLift_range_eq)).comp
⟨fun x y h =>
kerLift_injective f <| by rcases x with ⟨⟩; rcases y with ⟨⟩; injections,
fun ⟨w, z, hz⟩ => ⟨z, by rcases hz with ⟨⟩; rfl⟩⟩) with
map_mul' := MonoidHom.map_mul _ }
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for monoids in the case of a homomorphism with right inverse. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The first isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s in the case of a homomorphism
with right inverse."]
def quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (f : M →* P) (g : P → M) (hf : Function.RightInverse g f) :
(ker f).Quotient ≃* P :=
{ kerLift f with
toFun := kerLift f
invFun := (↑) ∘ g
left_inv := fun x => kerLift_injective _ (by rw [Function.comp_apply, kerLift_mk, hf])
right_inv := fun x => by (conv_rhs => rw [← hf x]); rfl }
/-- The first isomorphism theorem for Monoids in the case of a surjective homomorphism.
For a `computable` version, see `Con.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`.
-/
@[to_additive "The first isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s in the case of a surjective
homomorphism.
For a `computable` version, see `AddCon.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse`.
"]
noncomputable def quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (f : M →* P) (hf : Surjective f) :
(ker f).Quotient ≃* P :=
quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse _ _ hf.hasRightInverse.choose_spec
/-- If e : M →* N is surjective then (c.comap e).Quotient ≃* c.Quotient with c : Con N -/
@[to_additive "If e : M →* N is surjective then (c.comap e).Quotient ≃* c.Quotient with c :
AddCon N"]
noncomputable def comapQuotientEquivOfSurj (c : Con M) (f : N →* M) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(Con.comap f f.map_mul c).Quotient ≃* c.Quotient :=
(Con.congr Con.comap_eq).trans <| Con.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (c.mk'.comp f) <|
Con.mk'_surjective.comp hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma comapQuotientEquivOfSurj_mk (c : Con M) {f : N →* M} (hf : Function.Surjective f) (x : N) :
comapQuotientEquivOfSurj c f hf x = f x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma comapQuotientEquivOfSurj_symm_mk (c : Con M) {f : N →* M} (hf) (x : N) :
(comapQuotientEquivOfSurj c f hf).symm (f x) = x :=
(MulEquiv.symm_apply_eq (c.comapQuotientEquivOfSurj f hf)).mpr rfl
/-- This version infers the surjectivity of the function from a MulEquiv function -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "This version infers the surjectivity of the function from a
MulEquiv function"]
lemma comapQuotientEquivOfSurj_symm_mk' (c : Con M) (f : N ≃* M) (x : N) :
((@MulEquiv.symm (Con.Quotient (comap ⇑f _ c)) _ _ _
(comapQuotientEquivOfSurj c (f : N →* M) f.surjective)) ⟦f x⟧) = ↑x :=
(MulEquiv.symm_apply_eq (@comapQuotientEquivOfSurj M N _ _ c f _)).mpr rfl
/-- The **second isomorphism theorem for monoids**. -/
@[to_additive "The second isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s."]
noncomputable def comapQuotientEquiv (f : N →* M) :
(comap f f.map_mul c).Quotient ≃* MonoidHom.mrange (c.mk'.comp f) :=
(Con.congr comap_eq).trans <| quotientKerEquivRange <| c.mk'.comp f
/-- The **third isomorphism theorem for monoids**. -/
@[to_additive "The third isomorphism theorem for `AddMonoid`s."]
def quotientQuotientEquivQuotient (c d : Con M) (h : c ≤ d) :
(ker (c.map d h)).Quotient ≃* d.Quotient :=
{ Setoid.quotientQuotientEquivQuotient c.toSetoid d.toSetoid h with
map_mul' := fun x y =>
Con.induction_on₂ x y fun w z =>
Con.induction_on₂ w z fun a b =>
show _ = d.mk' a * d.mk' b by rw [← d.mk'.map_mul]; rfl }
end MulOneClass
section Monoids
@[to_additive]
theorem smul {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M) (a : α)
{w x : M} (h : c w x) : c (a • w) (a • x) := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using c.mul (c.refl' (a • (1 : M) : M)) h
end Monoids
section Actions
@[to_additive]
instance instSMul {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M) :
SMul α c.Quotient where
smul a := (Quotient.map' (a • ·)) fun _ _ => c.smul a
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_smul {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M)
(a : α) (x : M) : (↑(a • x) : c.Quotient) = a • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass {α β M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [SMul β M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] [IsScalarTower β M M] [SMulCommClass α β M] (c : Con M) :
SMulCommClass α β c.Quotient where
smul_comm a b := Quotient.ind' fun m => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_comm a b m
instance instIsScalarTower {α β M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α β] [SMul α M] [SMul β M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] [IsScalarTower β M M] [IsScalarTower α β M] (c : Con M) :
IsScalarTower α β c.Quotient where
smul_assoc a b := Quotient.ind' fun m => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_assoc a b m
instance instIsCentralScalar {α M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [SMul α M] [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] [IsScalarTower αᵐᵒᵖ M M] [IsCentralScalar α M] (c : Con M) :
IsCentralScalar α c.Quotient where
op_smul_eq_smul a := Quotient.ind' fun m => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| op_smul_eq_smul a m
@[to_additive]
instance mulAction {α M : Type*} [Monoid α] [MulOneClass M] [MulAction α M] [IsScalarTower α M M]
(c : Con M) : MulAction α c.Quotient where
one_smul := Quotient.ind' fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| one_smul _ _
mul_smul _ _ := Quotient.ind' fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| mul_smul _ _ _
instance mulDistribMulAction {α M : Type*} [Monoid α] [Monoid M] [MulDistribMulAction α M]
[IsScalarTower α M M] (c : Con M) : MulDistribMulAction α c.Quotient :=
{ smul_one := fun _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_one _
smul_mul := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_mul' _ _ _ }
end Actions
end Con
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Congruence/Basic.lean | 968 | 969 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
| _ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 720 | 723 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Quaternions
In this file we define quaternions `ℍ[R]` over a commutative ring `R`, and define some
algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`.
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra R a b c`, `ℍ[R, a, b, c]` :
[Bourbaki, *Algebra I*][bourbaki1989] with coefficients `a`, `b`, `c`
(Many other references such as Wikipedia assume $\operatorname{char} R ≠ 2$ therefore one can
complete the square and WLOG assume $b = 0$.)
* `Quaternion R`, `ℍ[R]` : the space of quaternions, a.k.a.
`QuaternionAlgebra R (-1) (0) (-1)`;
* `Quaternion.normSq` : square of the norm of a quaternion;
We also define the following algebraic structures on `ℍ[R]`:
* `Ring ℍ[R, a, b, c]`, `StarRing ℍ[R, a, b, c]`, and `Algebra R ℍ[R, a, b, c]` :
for any commutative ring `R`;
* `Ring ℍ[R]`, `StarRing ℍ[R]`, and `Algebra R ℍ[R]` : for any commutative ring `R`;
* `IsDomain ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered commutative ring `R`;
* `DivisionRing ℍ[R]` : for a linear ordered field `R`.
## Notation
The following notation is available with `open Quaternion` or `open scoped Quaternion`.
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]` : `QuaternionAlgebra R c₁ c₂ c₃`
* `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂]` : `QuaternionAlgebra R c₁ 0 c₂`
* `ℍ[R]` : quaternions over `R`.
## Implementation notes
We define quaternions over any ring `R`, not just `ℝ` to be able to deal with, e.g., integer
or rational quaternions without using real numbers. In particular, all definitions in this file
are computable.
## Tags
quaternion
-/
/-- Quaternion algebra over a type with fixed coefficients where $i^2 = a + bi$ and $j^2 = c$,
denoted as `ℍ[R,a,b]`.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `imI`, `imJ`, and `imK`. -/
@[ext]
structure QuaternionAlgebra (R : Type*) (a b c : R) where
/-- Real part of a quaternion. -/
re : R
/-- First imaginary part (i) of a quaternion. -/
imI : R
/-- Second imaginary part (j) of a quaternion. -/
imJ : R
/-- Third imaginary part (k) of a quaternion. -/
imK : R
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "," a "," b "," c "]" =>
QuaternionAlgebra R a b c
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "," a "," b "]" => QuaternionAlgebra R a 0 b
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
open Quaternion
/-- The equivalence between a quaternion algebra over `R` and `R × R × R × R`. -/
@[simps]
def equivProd {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ R × R × R × R where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2.1, a.2.2.1, a.2.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The equivalence between a quaternion algebra over `R` and `Fin 4 → R`. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def equivTuple {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ (Fin 4 → R) where
toFun a := ![a.1, a.2, a.3, a.4]
invFun a := ⟨a 0, a 1, a 2, a 3⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := by ext ⟨_, _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | ⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivTuple_apply {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃ x = ![x.re, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk.eta {R : Type*} {c₁ c₂ c₃} (a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : mk a.1 a.2 a.3 a.4 = a := rfl
variable {S T R : Type*} {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R} (r x y : R) (a b : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃] := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).subsingleton
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃] := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).surjective.nontrivial
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- The imaginary part of a quaternion.
Note that unless `c₂ = 0`, this definition is not particularly well-behaved;
for instance, `QuaternionAlgebra.star_im` only says that the star of an imaginary quaternion
is imaginary under this condition. -/
def im (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨0, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK⟩
@[simp]
theorem im_re : a.im.re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imI : a.im.imI = a.imI :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imJ : a.im.imJ = a.imJ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_imK : a.im.imK = a.imK :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_idem : a.im.im = a.im :=
rfl
/-- Coercion `R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`. -/
@[coe] def coe (x : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨x, 0, 0, 0⟩
instance : CoeTC R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨coe⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_re : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imI : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imJ : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imK : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (coe : R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) := fun _ _ h => congr_arg re h
@[simp]
theorem coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually.
-- Should adjust `simps` to name properly, i.e. as `zero_re` rather than `instZero_zero_re`.
instance : Zero ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imI : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imJ : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imK : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 0 := rfl
instance : Inhabited ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨0⟩
section One
variable [One R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : One ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨⟨1, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
@[scoped simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = 1 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imI : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imJ : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imK : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 1 := rfl
end One
end Zero
section Add
variable [Add R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : Add ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a.1 + b.1, a.2 + b.2, a.3 + b.3, a.4 + b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imI : (a + b).imI = a.imI + b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imJ : (a + b).imJ = a.imJ + b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imK : (a + b).imK = a.imK + b.imK := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_add_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) + mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk (a₁ + b₁) (a₂ + b₂) (a₃ + b₃) (a₄ + b₄) :=
rfl
end Add
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass R]
@[simp] theorem add_im : (a + b).im = a.im + b.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (zero_add _).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x + y := by ext <;> simp
end AddZeroClass
section Neg
variable [Neg R]
-- Porting note: removed `simps`, added simp lemmas manually. Should adjust `simps` to name properly
instance : Neg ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨fun a => ⟨-a.1, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imI : (-a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imJ : (-a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imK : (-a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : -(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ⟨-a₁, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ :=
rfl
end Neg
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup R]
@[simp] theorem neg_im : (-a).im = -a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext neg_zero.symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = -x := by ext <;> simp
instance : Sub ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a.1 - b.1, a.2 - b.2, a.3 - b.3, a.4 - b.4⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imI : (a - b).imI = a.imI - b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imJ : (a - b).imJ = a.imJ - b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imK : (a - b).imK = a.imK - b.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_im : (a - b).im = a.im - b.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_zero _).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_sub_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) - mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk (a₁ - b₁) (a₂ - b₂) (a₃ - b₃) (a₄ - b₄) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_im : (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem re_add_im : ↑a.re + a.im = a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (add_zero _) (zero_add _) (zero_add _) (zero_add _)
@[simp]
theorem sub_self_im : a - a.im = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_zero _) (sub_self _) (sub_self _) (sub_self _)
@[simp]
theorem sub_self_re : a - a.re = a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (sub_self _) (sub_zero _) (sub_zero _) (sub_zero _)
end AddGroup
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Multiplication is given by
* `1 * x = x * 1 = x`;
* `i * i = c₁ + c₂ * i`;
* `j * j = c₃`;
* `i * j = k`, `j * i = c₂ * j - k`;
* `k * k = - c₁ * c₃`;
* `i * k = c₁ * j + c₂ * k`, `k * i = -c₁ * j`;
* `j * k = c₂ * c₃ - c₃ * i`, `k * j = c₃ * i`. -/
instance : Mul ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
⟨fun a b =>
⟨a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₃ * a.3 * b.3 + c₂ * c₃ * a.3 * b.4 - c₁ * c₃ * a.4 * b.4,
a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 + c₂ * a.2 * b.2 - c₃ * a.3 * b.4 + c₃ * a.4 * b.3,
a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 + c₂ * a.3 * b.2 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2,
a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 + c₂ * a.2 * b.4 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re : (a * b).re = a.1 * b.1 + c₁ * a.2 * b.2 + c₃ * a.3 * b.3 +
c₂ * c₃ * a.3 * b.4 - c₁ * c₃ * a.4 * b.4 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imI : (a * b).imI = a.1 * b.2 + a.2 * b.1 +
c₂ * a.2 * b.2 - c₃ * a.3 * b.4 + c₃ * a.4 * b.3 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imJ : (a * b).imJ = a.1 * b.3 + c₁ * a.2 * b.4 + a.3 * b.1 +
c₂ * a.3 * b.2 - c₁ * a.4 * b.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_imK : (a * b).imK = a.1 * b.4 + a.2 * b.3 +
c₂ * a.2 * b.4 - a.3 * b.2 + a.4 * b.1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : R) :
(mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) * mk b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ =
mk
(a₁ * b₁ + c₁ * a₂ * b₂ + c₃ * a₃ * b₃ + c₂ * c₃ * a₃ * b₄ - c₁ * c₃ * a₄ * b₄)
(a₁ * b₂ + a₂ * b₁ + c₂ * a₂ * b₂ - c₃ * a₃ * b₄ + c₃ * a₄ * b₃)
(a₁ * b₃ + c₁ * a₂ * b₄ + a₃ * b₁ + c₂ * a₃ * b₂ - c₁ * a₄ * b₂)
(a₁ * b₄ + a₂ * b₃ + c₂ * a₂ * b₄ - a₃ * b₂ + a₄ * b₁) :=
rfl
end Ring
section SMul
variable [SMul S R] [SMul T R] (s : S)
instance : SMul S ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where smul s a := ⟨s • a.1, s • a.2, s • a.3, s • a.4⟩
instance [SMul S T] [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul_assoc s t x := by ext <;> exact smul_assoc _ _ _
instance [SMulCommClass S T R] : SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul_comm s t x := by ext <;> exact smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp] theorem smul_re : (s • a).re = s • a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imI : (s • a).imI = s • a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imJ : (s • a).imJ = s • a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imK : (s • a).imK = s • a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_im {S} [CommRing R] [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) : (s • a).im = s • a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (smul_zero s).symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk (re im_i im_j im_k : R) :
s • (⟨re, im_i, im_j, im_k⟩ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ⟨s • re, s • im_i, s • im_j, s • im_k⟩ :=
rfl
end SMul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [Zero R] [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) :
(↑(s • r) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = s • (r : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext rfl (smul_zero _).symm (smul_zero _).symm (smul_zero _).symm
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
(equivProd c₁ c₂ c₃).injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne R]
instance : AddCommGroupWithOne ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
natCast n := ((n : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
natCast_zero := by simp
natCast_succ := by simp
intCast n := ((n : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
intCast_ofNat _ := congr_arg coe (Int.cast_natCast _)
intCast_negSucc n := by
change coe _ = -coe _
rw [Int.cast_negSucc, coe_neg]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imI (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imJ (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imK (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ↑(n : R) = (n : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_re (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = z :=
rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).re = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imI (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imJ (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_imK (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imI (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imI = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imJ (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imJ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imK (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).imK = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ↑(z : R) = (z : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
rfl
end AddCommGroupWithOne
-- For the remainder of the file we assume `CommRing R`.
variable [CommRing R]
instance instRing : Ring ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroupWithOne ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃])
left_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
right_distrib _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
zero_mul _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_zero _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
one_mul _ := by ext <;> simp
mul_one _ := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x * y := by ext <;> simp
@[norm_cast, simp]
lemma coe_ofNat {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo]:
((ofNat(n) : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = (ofNat(n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) := by
rfl
-- TODO: add weaker `MulAction`, `DistribMulAction`, and `Module` instances (and repeat them
-- for `ℍ[R]`)
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
smul := (· • ·)
algebraMap :=
{ toFun s := coe (algebraMap S R s)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, coe_one]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, coe_zero]
map_mul' x y := by simp only [map_mul, coe_mul]
map_add' x y := by simp only [map_add, coe_add] }
smul_def' s x := by ext <;> simp [Algebra.smul_def]
commutes' s x := by ext <;> simp [Algebra.commutes]
theorem algebraMap_eq (r : R) : algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] r = ⟨r, 0, 0, 0⟩ :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_injective : (algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] : _ → _).Injective :=
fun _ _ ↦ by simp [algebraMap_eq]
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := ⟨by
rintro t ⟨a, b, c, d⟩ h
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro ht
simpa [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, ht] using h⟩
section
variable (c₁ c₂ c₃)
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.re` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def reₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := re
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imI` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imIₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imI
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imJ` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imJₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imJ
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.imK` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def imKₗ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := imK
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `QuaternionAlgebra.equivTuple` as a linear equivalence. -/
def linearEquivTuple : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₗ[R] Fin 4 → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm -- proofs are not `rfl` in the forward direction
{ (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm with
toFun := (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm
invFun := equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearEquivTuple :
⇑(linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃) = equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearEquivTuple_symm :
⇑(linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm = (equivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃).symm := rfl
/-- `ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]` has a basis over `R` given by `1`, `i`, `j`, and `k`. -/
noncomputable def basisOneIJK : Basis (Fin 4) R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] :=
.ofEquivFun <| linearEquivTuple c₁ c₂ c₃
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisOneIJK_repr (q : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
((basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃).repr q) = ![q.re, q.imI, q.imJ, q.imK] :=
rfl
instance : Module.Finite R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := .of_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃)
instance : Module.Free R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] := .of_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃)
theorem rank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.rank R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] = 4 := by
rw [rank_eq_card_basis (basisOneIJK c₁ c₂ c₃), Fintype.card_fin]
norm_num
theorem finrank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.finrank R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] = 4 := by
rw [Module.finrank, rank_eq_four, Cardinal.toNat_ofNat]
/-- There is a natural equivalence when swapping the first and third coefficients of a
quaternion algebra if `c₂` is 0. -/
@[simps]
def swapEquiv : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R,c₃,0,c₁] where
toFun t := ⟨t.1, t.3, t.2, -t.4⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, t.3, t.2, -t.4⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
map_mul' _ _ := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
map_add' _ _ := by ext <;> simp [add_comm]
commutes' _ := by simp [algebraMap_eq]
end
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x - y :=
(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).map_sub x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) ^ n :=
(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]).map_pow x n
theorem coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r :=
Algebra.commutes r a
theorem coe_commute : Commute (↑r) a :=
coe_commutes r a
theorem coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a :=
(Algebra.smul_def r a).symm
theorem mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a := by rw [← coe_commutes, coe_mul_eq_smul]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap : ⇑(algebraMap R ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = coe :=
rfl
theorem smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = ↑(x * y) := by rw [coe_mul, coe_mul_eq_smul]
/-- Quaternion conjugate. -/
instance instStarQuaternionAlgebra : Star ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where star a :=
⟨a.1 + c₂ * a.2, -a.2, -a.3, -a.4⟩
@[simp] theorem re_star : (star a).re = a.re + c₂ * a.imI := rfl
@[simp]
theorem imI_star : (star a).imI = -a.imI :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imJ_star : (star a).imJ = -a.imJ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem imK_star : (star a).imK = -a.imK :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem im_star : (star a).im = -a.im :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext neg_zero.symm rfl rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : R) : star (mk a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) =
⟨a₁ + c₂ * a₂, -a₂, -a₃, -a₄⟩ := rfl
instance instStarRing : StarRing ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] where
star_involutive x := by simp [Star.star]
star_add a b := by ext <;> simp [add_comm] ; ring
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
theorem self_add_star' : a + star a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) := by ext <;> simp [two_mul]; ring
theorem self_add_star : a + star a = 2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI := by simp [self_add_star']
theorem star_add_self' : star a + a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) := by rw [add_comm, self_add_star']
theorem star_add_self : star a + a = 2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI := by rw [add_comm, self_add_star]
theorem star_eq_two_re_sub : star a = ↑(2 * a.re + c₂ * a.imI) - a :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 a.star_add_self'
lemma comm (r : R) (x : ℍ[R, c₁, c₂, c₃]) : r * x = x * r := by
ext <;> simp [mul_comm]
instance : IsStarNormal a :=
⟨by
rw [commute_iff_eq, a.star_eq_two_re_sub];
ext <;> simp <;> ring⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem star_coe : star (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = x := by ext <;> simp
@[simp] theorem star_im : star a.im = -a.im + c₂ * a.imI := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem star_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [SMulCommClass S R R]
(s : S) (a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext
(by simp [mul_smul_comm]) (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm
/-- A version of `star_smul` for the special case when `c₂ = 0`, without `SMulCommClass S R R`. -/
theorem star_smul' [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (s : S) (a : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext (by simp) (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm (smul_neg _ _).symm
theorem eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re := by rw [h, coe_re]
theorem eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} :
a = a.re ↔ a ∈ Set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨a.re, h.symm⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => eq_re_of_eq_coe h.symm⟩
section CharZero
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R]
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_self {c₁ c₂ : R} {a : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]} : star a = a ↔ a = a.re := by
simp_all [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero]
theorem star_eq_neg {c₁ : R} {a : ℍ[R,c₁,0,c₃]} : star a = -a ↔ a.re = 0 := by
simp [QuaternionAlgebra.ext_iff, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
end CharZero
-- Can't use `rw ← star_eq_self` in the proof without additional assumptions
theorem star_mul_eq_coe : star a * a = (star a * a).re := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
theorem mul_star_eq_coe : a * star a = (a * star a).re := by
rw [← star_comm_self']
exact a.star_mul_eq_coe
open MulOpposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def starAe : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ starAddEquiv.trans opAddEquiv with
toFun := op ∘ star
invFun := star ∘ unop
map_mul' := fun x y => by simp
commutes' := fun r => by simp }
@[simp]
theorem coe_starAe : ⇑(starAe : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] ≃ₐ[R] _) = op ∘ star :=
rfl
end QuaternionAlgebra
/-- Space of quaternions over a type, denoted as `ℍ[R]`.
Implemented as a structure with four fields: `re`, `im_i`, `im_j`, and `im_k`. -/
def Quaternion (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] :=
QuaternionAlgebra R (-1) (0) (-1)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ[" R "]" => Quaternion R
open Quaternion
/-- The equivalence between the quaternions over `R` and `R × R × R × R`. -/
@[simps!]
def Quaternion.equivProd (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] : ℍ[R] ≃ R × R × R × R :=
QuaternionAlgebra.equivProd _ _ _
/-- The equivalence between the quaternions over `R` and `Fin 4 → R`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply]
def Quaternion.equivTuple (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] : ℍ[R] ≃ (Fin 4 → R) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.equivTuple _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem Quaternion.equivTuple_apply (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] (x : ℍ[R]) :
Quaternion.equivTuple R x = ![x.re, x.imI, x.imJ, x.imK] :=
rfl
instance {R : Type*} [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs (Subsingleton <| ℍ[R, -1, 0, -1])
instance {R : Type*} [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| ℍ[R, -1, 0, -1])
namespace Quaternion
variable {S T R : Type*} [CommRing R] (r x y : R) (a b : ℍ[R])
/-- Coercion `R → ℍ[R]`. -/
@[coe] def coe : R → ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.coe
instance : CoeTC R ℍ[R] := ⟨coe⟩
instance instRing : Ring ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instRing
instance : Inhabited ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Inhabited ℍ[R,-1, 0, -1]
instance [SMul S R] : SMul S ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| SMul S ℍ[R,-1, 0, -1]
instance [SMul S T] [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [IsScalarTower S T R] : IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsScalarTower S T ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [SMulCommClass S T R] : SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| SMulCommClass S T ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
protected instance algebra [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S ℍ[R] :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra S ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance : Star ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instStarQuaternionAlgebra
instance : StarRing ℍ[R] := QuaternionAlgebra.instStarRing
instance : IsStarNormal a := inferInstanceAs <| IsStarNormal (R := ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]) a
@[ext]
theorem ext : a.re = b.re → a.imI = b.imI → a.imJ = b.imJ → a.imK = b.imK → a = b :=
QuaternionAlgebra.ext
/-- The imaginary part of a quaternion. -/
nonrec def im (x : ℍ[R]) : ℍ[R] := x.im
@[simp] theorem im_re : a.im.re = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imI : a.im.imI = a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imJ : a.im.imJ = a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_imK : a.im.imK = a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem im_idem : a.im.im = a.im := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem re_add_im : ↑a.re + a.im = a := a.re_add_im
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_self_im : a - a.im = a.re := a.sub_self_im
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_self_re : a - ↑a.re = a.im := a.sub_self_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_re : (x : ℍ[R]).re = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imI : (x : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imJ : (x : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_imK : (x : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_im : (x : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_re : (0 : ℍ[R]).re = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imI : (0 : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imJ : (0 : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_imK : (0 : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem zero_im : (0 : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_re : (1 : ℍ[R]).re = 1 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imI : (1 : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imJ : (1 : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_imK : (1 : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[scoped simp] theorem one_im : (1 : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : R) : ℍ[R]) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_re : (a + b).re = a.re + b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imI : (a + b).imI = a.imI + b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imJ : (a + b).imJ = a.imJ + b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_imK : (a + b).imK = a.imK + b.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem add_im : (a + b).im = a.im + b.im := a.add_im b
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : ((x + y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x + y :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_add x y
@[simp] theorem neg_re : (-a).re = -a.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imI : (-a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imJ : (-a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_imK : (-a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem neg_im : (-a).im = -a.im := a.neg_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-x : R) : ℍ[R]) = -x :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_neg x
@[simp] theorem sub_re : (a - b).re = a.re - b.re := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imI : (a - b).imI = a.imI - b.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imJ : (a - b).imJ = a.imJ - b.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_imK : (a - b).imK = a.imK - b.imK := rfl
@[simp] nonrec theorem sub_im : (a - b).im = a.im - b.im := a.sub_im b
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : ((x - y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x - y :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_sub x y
@[simp]
theorem mul_re : (a * b).re = a.re * b.re - a.imI * b.imI - a.imJ * b.imJ - a.imK * b.imK :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_re a b).trans <| by simp [one_mul, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem mul_imI : (a * b).imI = a.re * b.imI + a.imI * b.re + a.imJ * b.imK - a.imK * b.imJ :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imI a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp]
theorem mul_imJ : (a * b).imJ = a.re * b.imJ - a.imI * b.imK + a.imJ * b.re + a.imK * b.imI :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imJ a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp]
theorem mul_imK : (a * b).imK = a.re * b.imK + a.imI * b.imJ - a.imJ * b.imI + a.imK * b.re :=
(QuaternionAlgebra.mul_imK a b).trans <| by ring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul : ((x * y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x * y := QuaternionAlgebra.coe_mul x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_pow (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℍ[R]) = (x : ℍ[R]) ^ n :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_pow x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).re = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imI (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imJ (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_imK (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ↑(n : R) = (n : ℍ[R]) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_re (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).re = z := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imI (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imJ (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_imK (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (z : ℤ) : (z : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ↑(z : R) = (z : ℍ[R]) := rfl
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_inj {x y : R} : (x : ℍ[R]) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem smul_re [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).re = s • a.re :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imI [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imI = s • a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imJ [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imJ = s • a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem smul_imK [SMul S R] (s : S) : (s • a).imK = s • a.imK := rfl
@[simp]
nonrec theorem smul_im [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) : (s • a).im = s • a.im :=
a.smul_im s
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : (↑(s • r) : ℍ[R]) = s • (r : ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_smul _ _
theorem coe_commutes : ↑r * a = a * r :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_commutes r a
theorem coe_commute : Commute (↑r) a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_commute r a
theorem coe_mul_eq_smul : ↑r * a = r • a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.coe_mul_eq_smul r a
theorem mul_coe_eq_smul : a * r = r • a :=
QuaternionAlgebra.mul_coe_eq_smul r a
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_def : ⇑(algebraMap R ℍ[R]) = coe :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_injective : (algebraMap R ℍ[R] : _ → _).Injective :=
QuaternionAlgebra.algebraMap_injective
theorem smul_coe : x • (y : ℍ[R]) = ↑(x * y) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.smul_coe x y
instance : Module.Finite R ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Module.Finite R ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
instance : Module.Free R ℍ[R] := inferInstanceAs <| Module.Free R ℍ[R,-1,0,-1]
theorem rank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.rank R ℍ[R] = 4 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.rank_eq_four _ _ _
theorem finrank_eq_four [StrongRankCondition R] : Module.finrank R ℍ[R] = 4 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.finrank_eq_four _ _ _
@[simp] theorem star_re : (star a).re = a.re := by
rw [QuaternionAlgebra.re_star, zero_mul, add_zero]
@[simp] theorem star_imI : (star a).imI = -a.imI := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_imJ : (star a).imJ = -a.imJ := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_imK : (star a).imK = -a.imK := rfl
@[simp] theorem star_im : (star a).im = -a.im := a.im_star
nonrec theorem self_add_star' : a + star a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by
simp [a.self_add_star', Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem self_add_star : a + star a = 2 * a.re := by
simp [a.self_add_star, Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_add_self' : star a + a = ↑(2 * a.re) := by
simp [a.star_add_self', Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_add_self : star a + a = 2 * a.re := by
simp [a.star_add_self, Quaternion.coe]
nonrec theorem star_eq_two_re_sub : star a = ↑(2 * a.re) - a := by
simp [a.star_eq_two_re_sub, Quaternion.coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem star_coe : star (x : ℍ[R]) = x :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_coe x
@[simp]
theorem im_star : star a.im = -a.im := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem star_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (s : S) (a : ℍ[R]) :
star (s • a) = s • star a := QuaternionAlgebra.star_smul' s a
theorem eq_re_of_eq_coe {a : ℍ[R]} {x : R} (h : a = x) : a = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.eq_re_of_eq_coe h
theorem eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe {a : ℍ[R]} : a = a.re ↔ a ∈ Set.range (coe : R → ℍ[R]) :=
QuaternionAlgebra.eq_re_iff_mem_range_coe
section CharZero
variable [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R]
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_self {a : ℍ[R]} : star a = a ↔ a = a.re :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem star_eq_neg {a : ℍ[R]} : star a = -a ↔ a.re = 0 :=
QuaternionAlgebra.star_eq_neg
end CharZero
nonrec theorem star_mul_eq_coe : star a * a = (star a * a).re :=
a.star_mul_eq_coe
nonrec theorem mul_star_eq_coe : a * star a = (a * star a).re :=
a.mul_star_eq_coe
open MulOpposite
/-- Quaternion conjugate as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring. -/
def starAe : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵐᵒᵖ :=
QuaternionAlgebra.starAe
@[simp]
theorem coe_starAe : ⇑(starAe : ℍ[R] ≃ₐ[R] ℍ[R]ᵐᵒᵖ) = op ∘ star :=
rfl
/-- Square of the norm. -/
def normSq : ℍ[R] →*₀ R where
toFun a := (a * star a).re
map_zero' := by simp only [star_zero, zero_mul, zero_re]
map_one' := by simp only [star_one, one_mul, one_re]
map_mul' x y := coe_injective <| by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_star_eq_coe, star_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc y, y.mul_star_eq_coe,
coe_commutes, ← mul_assoc, x.mul_star_eq_coe, ← coe_mul]
theorem normSq_def : normSq a = (a * star a).re := rfl
theorem normSq_def' : normSq a = a.1 ^ 2 + a.2 ^ 2 + a.3 ^ 2 + a.4 ^ 2 := by
simp only [normSq_def, sq, mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, mul_re, star_re, star_imI, star_imJ,
star_imK]
theorem normSq_coe : normSq (x : ℍ[R]) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [normSq_def, star_coe, ← coe_mul, coe_re, sq]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_star : normSq (star a) = normSq a := by simp [normSq_def']
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_natCast (n : ℕ) : normSq (n : ℍ[R]) = (n : R) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_natCast, normSq_coe]
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_intCast (z : ℤ) : normSq (z : ℍ[R]) = (z : R) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_intCast, normSq_coe]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_neg : normSq (-a) = normSq a := by simp only [normSq_def, star_neg, neg_mul_neg]
theorem self_mul_star : a * star a = normSq a := by rw [mul_star_eq_coe, normSq_def]
theorem star_mul_self : star a * a = normSq a := by rw [star_comm_self, self_mul_star]
theorem im_sq : a.im ^ 2 = -normSq a.im := by
simp_rw [sq, ← star_mul_self, im_star, neg_mul, neg_neg]
theorem coe_normSq_add : normSq (a + b) = normSq a + a * star b + b * star a + normSq b := by
simp only [star_add, ← self_mul_star, mul_add, add_mul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem normSq_smul (r : R) (q : ℍ[R]) : normSq (r • q) = r ^ 2 * normSq q := by
simp only [normSq_def', smul_re, smul_imI, smul_imJ, smul_imK, mul_pow, mul_add, smul_eq_mul]
theorem normSq_add (a b : ℍ[R]) : normSq (a + b) = normSq a + normSq b + 2 * (a * star b).re :=
calc
normSq (a + b) = normSq a + (a * star b).re + ((b * star a).re + normSq b) := by
simp_rw [normSq_def, star_add, add_mul, mul_add, add_re]
_ = normSq a + normSq b + ((a * star b).re + (b * star a).re) := by abel
_ = normSq a + normSq b + 2 * (a * star b).re := by
rw [← add_re, ← star_mul_star a b, self_add_star', coe_re]
end Quaternion
namespace Quaternion
variable {R : Type*}
section LinearOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a : ℍ[R]}
@[simp]
theorem normSq_eq_zero : normSq a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ normSq.map_zero⟩
rw [normSq_def', add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg]
at h
· exact ext a 0 (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.1) (pow_eq_zero h.1.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.1.2) (pow_eq_zero h.2)
all_goals apply_rules [sq_nonneg, add_nonneg]
theorem normSq_ne_zero : normSq a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := normSq_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem normSq_nonneg : 0 ≤ normSq a := by
rw [normSq_def']
apply_rules [sq_nonneg, add_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem normSq_le_zero : normSq a ≤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
normSq_nonneg.le_iff_eq.trans normSq_eq_zero
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℍ[R] where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, mt (congr_arg QuaternionAlgebra.re) zero_ne_one⟩
instance : NoZeroDivisors ℍ[R] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b} hab :=
have : normSq a * normSq b = 0 := by rwa [← map_mul, normSq_eq_zero]
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).imp normSq_eq_zero.1 normSq_eq_zero.1
instance : IsDomain ℍ[R] := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
theorem sq_eq_normSq : a ^ 2 = normSq a ↔ a = a.re := by
rw [← star_eq_self, ← star_mul_self, sq, mul_eq_mul_right_iff, eq_comm]
exact or_iff_left_of_imp fun ha ↦ ha.symm ▸ star_zero _
theorem sq_eq_neg_normSq : a ^ 2 = -normSq a ↔ a.re = 0 := by
simp_rw [← star_eq_neg]
obtain rfl | hq0 := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp
· rw [← star_mul_self, ← mul_neg, ← neg_sq, sq, mul_left_inj' (neg_ne_zero.mpr hq0), eq_comm]
end LinearOrderedCommRing
section Field
variable [Field R] (a b : ℍ[R])
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℍ[R] where nnratCast q := (q : R)
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℍ[R] where ratCast q := (q : R)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma re_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma im_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imI_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imJ_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma imK_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).re = q := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).im = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imI (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imI = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imJ (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imJ = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ratCast_imK (q : ℚ) : (q : ℍ[R]).imK = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ↑(q : R) = (q : ℍ[R]) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ↑(q : R) = (q : ℍ[R]) := rfl
variable [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] (a b : ℍ[R])
@[simps -isSimp]
instance instInv : Inv ℍ[R] :=
⟨fun a => (normSq a)⁻¹ • star a⟩
instance instGroupWithZero : GroupWithZero ℍ[R] :=
{ Quaternion.instNontrivial with
inv := Inv.inv
inv_zero := by rw [instInv_inv, star_zero, smul_zero]
mul_inv_cancel := fun a ha => by
rw [instInv_inv, Algebra.mul_smul_comm (normSq a)⁻¹ a (star a), self_mul_star, smul_coe,
inv_mul_cancel₀ (normSq_ne_zero.2 ha), coe_one] }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_inv (x : R) : ((x⁻¹ : R) : ℍ[R]) = (↑x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) _
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_div (x y : R) : ((x / y : R) : ℍ[R]) = x / y :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) x y
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_zpow (x : R) (z : ℤ) : ((x ^ z : R) : ℍ[R]) = (x : ℍ[R]) ^ z :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap R ℍ[R]) x z
instance instDivisionRing : DivisionRing ℍ[R] where
__ := Quaternion.instRing
__ := Quaternion.instGroupWithZero
nnqsmul := (· • ·)
qsmul := (· • ·)
nnratCast_def _ := by rw [← coe_nnratCast, NNRat.cast_def, coe_div, coe_natCast, coe_natCast]
ratCast_def _ := by rw [← coe_ratCast, Rat.cast_def, coe_div, coe_intCast, coe_natCast]
nnqsmul_def _ _ := by rw [← coe_nnratCast, coe_mul_eq_smul]; ext <;> exact NNRat.smul_def ..
qsmul_def _ _ := by rw [← coe_ratCast, coe_mul_eq_smul]; ext <;> exact Rat.smul_def ..
theorem normSq_inv : normSq a⁻¹ = (normSq a)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq _
theorem normSq_div : normSq (a / b) = normSq a / normSq b :=
map_div₀ normSq a b
theorem normSq_zpow (z : ℤ) : normSq (a ^ z) = normSq a ^ z :=
map_zpow₀ normSq a z
@[norm_cast]
theorem normSq_ratCast (q : ℚ) : normSq (q : ℍ[R]) = (q : ℍ[R]) ^ 2 := by
rw [← coe_ratCast, normSq_coe, coe_pow]
end Field
end Quaternion
namespace Cardinal
open Quaternion
section QuaternionAlgebra
variable {R : Type*} (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R)
private theorem pow_four [Infinite R] : #R ^ 4 = #R :=
power_nat_eq (aleph0_le_mk R) <| by decide
/-- The cardinality of a quaternion algebra, as a type. -/
theorem mk_quaternionAlgebra : #(ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R ^ 4 := by
rw [mk_congr (QuaternionAlgebra.equivProd c₁ c₂ c₃)]
simp only [mk_prod, lift_id]
ring
@[simp]
theorem mk_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R := by
rw [mk_quaternionAlgebra, pow_four]
/-- The cardinality of a quaternion algebra, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R ^ 4 := by
rw [mk_univ, mk_quaternionAlgebra]
theorem mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite [Infinite R] :
#(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = #R := by rw [mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra, pow_four]
/-- Show the quaternion ⟨w, x, y, z⟩ as a string "{ re := w, imI := x, imJ := y, imK := z }".
For the typical case of quaternions over ℝ, each component will show as a Cauchy sequence due to
the way Real numbers are represented.
-/
instance [Repr R] {a b c : R} : Repr ℍ[R, a, b, c] where
reprPrec q _ :=
s!"\{ re := {repr q.re}, imI := {repr q.imI}, imJ := {repr q.imJ}, imK := {repr q.imK} }"
end QuaternionAlgebra
section Quaternion
variable (R : Type*) [Zero R] [One R] [Neg R]
/-- The cardinality of the quaternions, as a type. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_quaternion : #(ℍ[R]) = #R ^ 4 :=
mk_quaternionAlgebra _ _ _
theorem mk_quaternion_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(ℍ[R]) = #R :=
mk_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite _ _ _
/-- The cardinality of the quaternions, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_quaternion : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R]) = #R ^ 4 :=
mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra _ _ _
theorem mk_univ_quaternion_of_infinite [Infinite R] : #(Set.univ : Set ℍ[R]) = #R :=
mk_univ_quaternionAlgebra_of_infinite _ _ _
end Quaternion
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quaternion.lean | 1,411 | 1,415 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Integral average of a function
In this file we define `MeasureTheory.average μ f` (notation: `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`) to be the average
value of `f` with respect to measure `μ`. It is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ)`, so it
is equal to zero if `f` is not integrable or if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability
measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, we use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ` (notation for `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`). For
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`.
Both have a version for the Lebesgue integral rather than Bochner.
We prove several version of the first moment method: An integrable function is below/above its
average on a set of positive measure:
* `measure_le_setLAverage_pos` for the Lebesgue integral
* `measure_le_setAverage_pos` for the Bochner integral
## Implementation notes
The average is defined as an integral over `(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ` so that all theorems about Bochner
integrals work for the average without modifications. For theorems that require integrability of a
function, we provide a convenience lemma `MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average`.
## Tags
integral, center mass, average value
-/
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
/-!
### Average value of a function w.r.t. a measure
The (Bochner, Lebesgue) average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` (notation:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ`, `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`) is defined as the (Bochner, Lebesgue) integral divided by the total
measure, so it is equal to zero if `μ` is an infinite measure, and (typically) equal to infinity if
`f` is not integrable. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral.
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
section ENNReal
variable (μ) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def laverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) := ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage μ r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if the space has infinite
measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage volume f) => r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If `s`
has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If
`s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral. -/
notation3 (prettyPrint := false)
"⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage Measure.restrict volume s f) => r
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero : ⨍⁻ _x, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [laverage, lintegral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [laverage]
theorem laverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ := rfl
theorem laverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) / μ univ := by
rw [laverage_eq', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, smul_eq_mul]
theorem laverage_eq_lintegral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [laverage, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_mul_laverage [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ univ * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, lintegral_zero_measure, laverage_zero_measure, mul_zero]
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem setLAverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) / μ s := by rw [laverage_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq := setLAverage_eq
theorem setLAverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [laverage_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq' := setLAverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem laverage_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, lintegral_congr_ae h]
theorem setLAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr h, measure_congr h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr := setLAverage_congr
theorem setLAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr_fun hs h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr_fun := setLAverage_congr_fun
theorem laverage_lt_top (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∞ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq]
exact div_lt_top hf (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ)
theorem setLAverage_lt_top : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞ → ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∞ :=
laverage_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_lt_top := setLAverage_lt_top
theorem laverage_add_measure :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
μ univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ν univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂ν := by
by_cases hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ
simp [laverage_eq, hμ]
by_cases hν : IsFiniteMeasure ν; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hν
simp [laverage_eq, hν]
haveI := hμ; haveI := hν
simp only [← ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm, measure_mul_laverage, ← ENNReal.add_div,
← lintegral_add_measure, ← Measure.add_apply, ← laverage_eq]
theorem measure_mul_setLAverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ s * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
have := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_mul_laverage, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias measure_mul_setLaverage := measure_mul_setLAverage
theorem laverage_union (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
μ s / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ + μ t / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, laverage_add_measure, restrict_apply_univ, restrict_apply_univ]
theorem laverage_union_mem_openSegment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), ENNReal.div_pos hs₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩,
ENNReal.div_pos ht₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_union_mem_segment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ≥0∞] ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hs₀ : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hs₀
rw [restrict_congr_set (hs₀.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), zero_le _, zero_le _, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
laverage_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _)
@[simp]
theorem laverage_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [laverage, lintegral_const, measure_univ, mul_one]
theorem setLAverage_const (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ,
univ_inter, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hs₀ hs, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_const := setLAverage_const
theorem laverage_one [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [NeZero μ] : ⨍⁻ _x, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 1 :=
laverage_const _ _
theorem setLAverage_one (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 1 :=
setLAverage_const hs₀ hs _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_one := setLAverage_one
@[simp]
theorem laverage_mul_measure_univ (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(⨍⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) * μ univ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem lintegral_laverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ _x, ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp
theorem setLIntegral_setLAverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ _x in s, ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_laverage _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLintegral_setLaverage := setLIntegral_setLAverage
end ENNReal
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable (μ)
variable {f g : α → E}
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable or
if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def average (f : α → E) :=
∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable or
if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average μ r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume.real univ)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable
or if the space has infinite measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal
to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => average volume f) => r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ.real s)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `f` is not integrable on
`s` or if `s` has infinite measure. If `s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is
equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => average (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of a function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume.real s)⁻¹ * ∫ x, f x`, so it takes value zero `f` is not integrable on `s`
or if `s` has infinite measure. If `s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral. -/
notation3 "⨍ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => average (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
@[simp]
theorem average_zero : ⨍ _, (0 : E) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [average, integral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem average_zero_measure (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
rw [average, smul_zero, integral_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem average_neg (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, -f x ∂μ = -⨍ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
theorem average_eq' (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ :=
rfl
theorem average_eq (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = (μ.real univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq', integral_smul_measure, ENNReal.toReal_inv, measureReal_def]
theorem average_eq_integral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → E) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_smul_average [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
μ.real univ • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, integral_zero_measure, average_zero_measure, smul_zero]
· rw [average_eq, smul_inv_smul₀]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_pos ?_ <| measure_ne_top _ _).ne'
rwa [Ne, measure_univ_eq_zero]
theorem setAverage_eq (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = (μ.real s)⁻¹ • ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem setAverage_eq' (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [average_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
variable {μ}
theorem average_congr {f g : α → E} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [average_eq, integral_congr_ae h]
theorem setAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setAverage_eq, setIntegral_congr_set h, measureReal_congr h]
theorem setAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍ x in s, g x ∂μ := by simp only [average_eq, setIntegral_congr_ae hs h]
theorem average_add_measure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure ν] {f : α → E}
(hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
⨍ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
(μ.real univ / (μ.real univ + ν.real univ)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂μ +
(ν.real univ / (μ.real univ + ν.real univ)) • ⨍ x, f x ∂ν := by
simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, measure_smul_average, ← smul_add,
← integral_add_measure hμ hν, ← ENNReal.toReal_add (measure_ne_top μ _) (measure_ne_top ν _)]
rw [average_eq, measureReal_add_apply]
theorem average_pair [CompleteSpace E]
{f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (hgi : Integrable g μ) :
⨍ x, (f x, g x) ∂μ = (⨍ x, f x ∂μ, ⨍ x, g x ∂μ) :=
integral_pair hfi.to_average hgi.to_average
theorem measure_smul_setAverage (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ.real s • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_smul_average, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem average_union {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
(μ.real s / (μ.real s + μ.real t)) • ⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ +
(μ.real t / (μ.real s + μ.real t)) • ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
haveI := Fact.mk hsμ.lt_top; haveI := Fact.mk htμ.lt_top
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, average_add_measure hfs hft, measureReal_restrict_apply_univ,
measureReal_restrict_apply_univ]
theorem average_union_mem_openSegment {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞)
(hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
replace hs₀ : 0 < μ.real s := ENNReal.toReal_pos hs₀ hsμ
replace ht₀ : 0 < μ.real t := ENNReal.toReal_pos ht₀ htμ
exact mem_openSegment_iff_div.mpr
⟨μ.real s, μ.real t, hs₀, ht₀, (average_union hd ht hsμ htμ hfs hft).symm⟩
theorem average_union_mem_segment {f : α → E} {s t : Set α} (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t)
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
⨍ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ] ⨍ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hse : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hse
rw [restrict_congr_set (hse.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
mem_segment_iff_div.mpr
⟨μ.real s, μ.real t, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ?_,
(average_union hd ht hsμ htμ hfs hft).symm⟩
calc
0 < μ.real s := ENNReal.toReal_pos hse hsμ
_ ≤ _ := le_add_of_nonneg_right ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
theorem average_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
⨍ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
average_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _) hfi.integrableOn hfi.integrableOn
variable [CompleteSpace E]
@[simp]
theorem average_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : E) :
⨍ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
rw [average, integral_const, measureReal_def, measure_univ, ENNReal.toReal_one, one_smul]
theorem setAverage_const {s : Set α} (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
⨍ _ in s, c ∂μ = c :=
have := NeZero.mk hs₀; have := Fact.mk hs.lt_top; average_const _ _
theorem integral_average (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
∫ _, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by simp
theorem setIntegral_setAverage (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :
∫ _ in s, ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_average _ _
theorem integral_sub_average (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → E) :
∫ x, f x - ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_sub hf (integrable_const _), integral_average, sub_self]
refine integral_undef fun h => hf ?_
convert h.add (integrable_const (⨍ a, f a ∂μ))
exact (sub_add_cancel _ _).symm
theorem setAverage_sub_setAverage (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (f : α → E) :
∫ x in s, f x - ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ∂μ = 0 :=
haveI : Fact (μ s < ∞) := ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hs⟩
integral_sub_average _ _
theorem integral_average_sub [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ - f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [integral_sub (integrable_const _) hf, integral_average, sub_self]
theorem setIntegral_setAverage_sub (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∫ x in s, ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ - f x ∂μ = 0 :=
haveI : Fact (μ s < ∞) := ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hs⟩
integral_average_sub hf
end NormedAddCommGroup
theorem ofReal_average {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hf₀ : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) = (∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) / μ univ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [average_eq, smul_eq_mul, measureReal_def, ← toReal_inv, ofReal_mul toReal_nonneg,
ofReal_toReal (inv_ne_top.2 <| measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ),
ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal hf hf₀, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem ofReal_setAverage {f : α → ℝ} (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hf₀ : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ) = (∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) / μ s := by
simpa using ofReal_average hf hf₀
theorem toReal_laverage {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ ∞) :
(⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ).toReal = ⨍ x, (f x).toReal ∂μ := by
rw [average_eq, laverage_eq, smul_eq_mul, toReal_div, div_eq_inv_mul, ←
integral_toReal hf (hf'.mono fun _ => lt_top_iff_ne_top.2), measureReal_def]
theorem toReal_setLAverage {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hf' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, f x ≠ ∞) :
(⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ).toReal = ⨍ x in s, (f x).toReal ∂μ := by
simpa [laverage_eq] using toReal_laverage hf hf'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias toReal_setLaverage := toReal_setLAverage
/-! ### First moment method -/
section FirstMomentReal
variable {N : Set α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is smaller than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_le_setAverage_pos (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
0 < μ ({x ∈ s | f x ≤ ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ}) := by
refine pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => ?_
replace H : (μ.restrict s) {x | f x ≤ ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ} = 0 := by
rwa [restrict_apply₀, inter_comm]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_le hf.1 aestronglyMeasurable_const
haveI := Fact.mk hμ₁.lt_top
refine (integral_sub_average (μ.restrict s) f).not_gt ?_
refine (setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae ?_ ?_).2 ?_
· refine measure_mono_null (fun x hx ↦ ?_) H
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, sub_nonneg, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_le] at hx
exact hx.le
· exact hf.sub (integrableOn_const.2 <| Or.inr <| lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hμ₁)
· rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero, inter_comm, ← diff_compl, ← diff_inter_self_eq_diff, measure_diff_null]
refine measure_mono_null ?_ (measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict H)
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ fun a ha => (sub_eq_zero.1 <| of_not_not ha).le
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is greater than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_setAverage_le_pos (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
0 < μ ({x ∈ s | ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ f x}) := by
simpa [integral_neg, neg_div] using measure_le_setAverage_pos hμ hμ₁ hf.neg
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its mean. -/
theorem exists_le_setAverage (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
let ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_le_setAverage_pos hμ hμ₁ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx, h⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its mean. -/
theorem exists_setAverage_le (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∃ x ∈ s, ⨍ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ f x :=
let ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_setAverage_le_pos hμ hμ₁ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx, h⟩
section FiniteMeasure
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is smaller than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_le_average_pos (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
0 < μ {x | f x ≤ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ} := by
simpa using measure_le_setAverage_pos (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)
hf.integrableOn
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is greater than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_average_le_pos (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
0 < μ {x | ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
simpa using measure_setAverage_le_pos (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)
hf.integrableOn
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its mean. -/
theorem exists_le_average (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, f x ≤ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_le_average_pos hμ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its mean. -/
theorem exists_average_le (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_average_le_pos hμ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its mean, while
avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_le_average (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ f x ≤ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ := by
have := measure_le_average_pos hμ hf
rw [← measure_diff_null hN] at this
obtain ⟨x, hx, hxN⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero this.ne'
exact ⟨x, hxN, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its mean, while
avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_average_le (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ ⨍ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa [integral_neg, neg_div] using exists_not_mem_null_le_average hμ hf.neg hN
end FiniteMeasure
section ProbabilityMeasure
variable [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is smaller than its integral on a set of
positive measure. -/
theorem measure_le_integral_pos (hf : Integrable f μ) : 0 < μ {x | f x ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ} := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
measure_le_average_pos (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. An integrable function is greater than its integral on a set of
positive measure. -/
theorem measure_integral_le_pos (hf : Integrable f μ) : 0 < μ {x | ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
measure_average_le_pos (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its integral. -/
theorem exists_le_integral (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, f x ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using exists_le_average (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its integral. -/
theorem exists_integral_le (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∃ x, ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using exists_average_le (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of an integrable function is smaller than its integral,
while avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_le_integral (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ f x ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
exists_not_mem_null_le_average (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf hN
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of an integrable function is greater than its integral,
while avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_integral_le (hf : Integrable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa only [average_eq_integral] using
exists_not_mem_null_average_le (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf hN
end ProbabilityMeasure
end FirstMomentReal
section FirstMomentENNReal
variable {N : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- **First moment method**. A measurable function is smaller than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_le_setLAverage_pos (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) : 0 < μ {x ∈ s | f x ≤ ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ} := by
obtain h | h := eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ) ∞
· simpa [mul_top, hμ₁, laverage, h, top_div_of_ne_top hμ₁, pos_iff_ne_zero] using hμ
have := measure_le_setAverage_pos hμ hμ₁ (integrable_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top hf h)
rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep, ← Measure.restrict_apply₀
(hf.aestronglyMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_le aestronglyMeasurable_const)]
rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep, ← Measure.restrict_apply₀
(hf.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_le aestronglyMeasurable_const),
← measure_diff_null (measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top hf h)] at this
refine this.trans_le (measure_mono ?_)
rintro x ⟨hfx, hx⟩
dsimp at hfx
rwa [← toReal_laverage hf, toReal_le_toReal hx (setLAverage_lt_top h).ne] at hfx
simp_rw [ae_iff, not_ne_iff]
exact measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top hf h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias measure_le_setLaverage_pos := measure_le_setLAverage_pos
/-- **First moment method**. A measurable function is greater than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_setLAverage_le_pos (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hint : ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : 0 < μ {x ∈ s | ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
obtain hμ₁ | hμ₁ := eq_or_ne (μ s) ∞
· simp [setLAverage_eq, hμ₁]
obtain ⟨g, hg, hgf, hfg⟩ := exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (μ.restrict s) f
have hfg' : ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ = ⨍⁻ a in s, g a ∂μ := by simp_rw [laverage_eq, hfg]
rw [hfg] at hint
have :=
measure_setAverage_le_pos hμ hμ₁ (integrable_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top hg.aemeasurable hint)
simp_rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep, ← Measure.restrict_apply₀' hs, hfg']
rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep, ← Measure.restrict_apply₀' hs, ←
measure_diff_null (measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top hg.aemeasurable hint)] at this
refine this.trans_le (measure_mono ?_)
rintro x ⟨hfx, hx⟩
dsimp at hfx
rw [← toReal_laverage hg.aemeasurable, toReal_le_toReal (setLAverage_lt_top hint).ne hx] at hfx
· exact hfx.trans (hgf _)
· simp_rw [ae_iff, not_ne_iff]
exact measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top hg.aemeasurable hint
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias measure_setLaverage_le_pos := measure_setLAverage_le_pos
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of a measurable function is smaller than its mean. -/
theorem exists_le_setLAverage (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hμ₁ : μ s ≠ ∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
let ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_le_setLAverage_pos hμ hμ₁ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx, h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias exists_le_setLaverage := exists_le_setLAverage
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of a measurable function is greater than its mean. -/
theorem exists_setLAverage_le (hμ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hint : ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∃ x ∈ s, ⨍⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ f x :=
let ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_setLAverage_le_pos hμ hs hint).ne'
⟨x, hx, h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias exists_setLaverage_le := exists_setLAverage_le
/-- **First moment method**. A measurable function is greater than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_laverage_le_pos (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hint : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
0 < μ {x | ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
simpa [hint] using
@measure_setLAverage_le_pos _ _ _ _ f (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) nullMeasurableSet_univ
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of a measurable function is greater than its mean. -/
theorem exists_laverage_le (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hint : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∃ x, ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_laverage_le_pos hμ hint).ne'
⟨x, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of a measurable function is greater than its mean, while
avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_laverage_le (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hint : ∫⁻ a : α, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
have := measure_laverage_le_pos hμ hint
rw [← measure_diff_null hN] at this
obtain ⟨x, hx, hxN⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero this.ne'
exact ⟨x, hxN, hx⟩
section FiniteMeasure
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
/-- **First moment method**. A measurable function is smaller than its mean on a set of positive
measure. -/
theorem measure_le_laverage_pos (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
0 < μ {x | f x ≤ ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ} := by
simpa using
measure_le_setLAverage_pos (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _) hf.restrict
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of a measurable function is smaller than its mean. -/
theorem exists_le_laverage (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : ∃ x, f x ≤ ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero (measure_le_laverage_pos hμ hf).ne'
⟨x, hx⟩
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of a measurable function is smaller than its mean, while
avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_le_laverage (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ f x ≤ ⨍⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have := measure_le_laverage_pos hμ hf
rw [← measure_diff_null hN] at this
obtain ⟨x, hx, hxN⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero this.ne'
exact ⟨x, hxN, hx⟩
end FiniteMeasure
section ProbabilityMeasure
variable [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
/-- **First moment method**. A measurable function is smaller than its integral on a set f
positive measure. -/
theorem measure_le_lintegral_pos (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : 0 < μ {x | f x ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ} := by
simpa only [laverage_eq_lintegral] using
measure_le_laverage_pos (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. A measurable function is greater than its integral on a set f
positive measure. -/
theorem measure_lintegral_le_pos (hint : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : 0 < μ {x | ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x} := by
simpa only [laverage_eq_lintegral] using
measure_laverage_le_pos (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hint
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of a measurable function is smaller than its integral. -/
theorem exists_le_lintegral (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : ∃ x, f x ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [laverage_eq_lintegral] using exists_le_laverage (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of a measurable function is greater than its integral. -/
theorem exists_lintegral_le (hint : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∃ x, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa only [laverage_eq_lintegral] using
exists_laverage_le (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hint
/-- **First moment method**. The minimum of a measurable function is smaller than its integral,
while avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_le_lintegral (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ f x ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [laverage_eq_lintegral] using
exists_not_mem_null_le_laverage (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hf hN
/-- **First moment method**. The maximum of a measurable function is greater than its integral,
while avoiding a null set. -/
theorem exists_not_mem_null_lintegral_le (hint : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (hN : μ N = 0) :
∃ x, x ∉ N ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ f x := by
simpa only [laverage_eq_lintegral] using
exists_not_mem_null_laverage_le (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) hint hN
end ProbabilityMeasure
end FirstMomentENNReal
/-- If the average of a function `f` along a sequence of sets `aₙ` converges to `c` (more precisely,
we require that `⨍ y in a i, ‖f y - c‖ ∂μ` tends to `0`), then the integral of `gₙ • f` also tends
to `c` if `gₙ` is supported in `aₙ`, has integral converging to one and supremum at most `K / μ aₙ`.
-/
theorem tendsto_integral_smul_of_tendsto_average_norm_sub
[CompleteSpace E]
{ι : Type*} {a : ι → Set α} {l : Filter ι} {f : α → E} {c : E} {g : ι → α → ℝ} (K : ℝ)
(hf : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ⨍ y in a i, ‖f y - c‖ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0))
(f_int : ∀ᶠ i in l, IntegrableOn f (a i) μ)
(hg : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ y, g i y ∂μ) l (𝓝 1))
(g_supp : ∀ᶠ i in l, Function.support (g i) ⊆ a i)
(g_bound : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x, |g i x| ≤ K / μ.real (a i)) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ y, g i y • f y ∂μ) l (𝓝 c) := by
have g_int : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (g i) μ := by
filter_upwards [(tendsto_order.1 hg).1 _ zero_lt_one] with i hi
contrapose hi
simp only [integral_undef hi, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_eq_true]
have I : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫ y, g i y • (f y - c) ∂μ + (∫ y, g i y ∂μ) • c = ∫ y, g i y • f y ∂μ := by
filter_upwards [f_int, g_int, g_supp, g_bound] with i hif hig hisupp hibound
rw [← integral_smul_const, ← integral_add]
· simp only [smul_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· simp_rw [smul_sub]
apply Integrable.sub _ (hig.smul_const _)
have A : Function.support (fun y ↦ g i y • f y) ⊆ a i := by
apply Subset.trans _ hisupp
exact Function.support_smul_subset_left _ _
rw [← integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset A]
apply Integrable.smul_of_top_right hif
exact memLp_top_of_bound hig.aestronglyMeasurable.restrict
(K / μ.real (a i)) (Eventually.of_forall hibound)
· exact hig.smul_const _
have L0 : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ y, g i y • (f y - c) ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
have := hf.const_mul K
simp only [mul_zero] at this
refine squeeze_zero_norm' ?_ this
filter_upwards [g_supp, g_bound, f_int, (tendsto_order.1 hg).1 _ zero_lt_one]
with i hi h'i h''i hi_int
have mu_ai : μ (a i) < ∞ := by
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top]
intro h
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_top, _root_.div_zero, abs_nonpos_iff, measureReal_def] at h'i
have : ∫ (y : α), g i y ∂μ = ∫ (y : α), 0 ∂μ := by congr; ext y; exact h'i y
simp [this] at hi_int
apply (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans
| simp_rw [average_eq, smul_eq_mul, ← integral_const_mul, norm_smul, ← mul_assoc,
← div_eq_mul_inv]
have : ∀ x, x ∉ a i → ‖g i x‖ * ‖(f x - c)‖ = 0 := by
intro x hx
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 801 | 804 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.PeakFunction
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
/-!
# Fourier inversion formula
In a finite-dimensional real inner product space, we show the Fourier inversion formula, i.e.,
`𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v = f v` if `f` and `𝓕 f` are integrable, and `f` is continuous at `v`. This is proved
in `MeasureTheory.Integrable.fourier_inversion`. See also `Continuous.fourier_inversion`
giving `𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) = f` under an additional continuity assumption for `f`.
We use the following proof. A naïve computation gives
`𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v
= ∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw
= ∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) ∫_x, exp (-2 I π ⟪w, x⟫) f x dx) dw
= ∫_x (∫_ w, exp (2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw) f x dx `
However, the Fubini step does not make sense for lack of integrability, and the middle integral
`∫_ w, exp (2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw` (which one would like to be a Dirac at `v - x`) is not defined.
To gain integrability, one multiplies with a Gaussian function `exp (-c⁻¹ ‖w‖^2)`, with a large
(but finite) `c`. As this function converges pointwise to `1` when `c → ∞`, we get
`∫_w exp (2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw = lim_c ∫_w exp (-c⁻¹ ‖w‖^2 + 2 I π ⟪w, v⟫) 𝓕 f (w) dw`.
One can perform Fubini on the right hand side for fixed `c`, writing the integral as
`∫_x (∫_w exp (-c⁻¹‖w‖^2 + 2 I π ⟪w, v - x⟫ dw)) f x dx`.
The middle factor is the Fourier transform of a more and more flat function
(converging to the constant `1`), hence it becomes more and more concentrated, around the
point `v`. (Morally, it converges to the Dirac at `v`). Moreover, it has integral one.
Therefore, multiplying by `f` and integrating, one gets a term converging to `f v` as `c → ∞`.
Since it also converges to `𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) v`, this proves the result.
To check the concentration property of the middle factor and the fact that it has integral one, we
rely on the explicit computation of the Fourier transform of Gaussians.
-/
open Filter MeasureTheory Complex Module Metric Real Bornology
open scoped Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace Complex
variable {V E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : V → E}
namespace Real
| lemma tendsto_integral_cexp_sq_smul (hf : Integrable f) :
Tendsto (fun (c : ℝ) ↦ (∫ v : V, cexp (- c⁻¹ * ‖v‖^2) • f v))
atTop (𝓝 (∫ v : V, f v)) := by
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence _ _ _ hf.norm
· filter_upwards with v
nth_rewrite 2 [show f v = cexp (- (0 : ℝ) * ‖v‖^2) • f v by simp]
apply (Tendsto.cexp _).smul_const
exact tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.ofReal.neg.mul_const _
· filter_upwards with c using
AEStronglyMeasurable.smul (Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable (by fun_prop)) hf.1
· filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with c (hc : 0 ≤ c)
filter_upwards with v
simp only [ofReal_inv, neg_mul, norm_smul]
norm_cast
conv_rhs => rw [← one_mul (‖f v‖)]
gcongr
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_exp, exp_le_one_iff, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
positivity
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/Inversion.lean | 50 | 67 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Integration
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
/-!
# Variance of random variables
We define the variance of a real-valued random variable as `Var[X] = 𝔼[(X - 𝔼[X])^2]` (in the
`ProbabilityTheory` locale).
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.evariance`: the variance of a real-valued random variable as an extended
non-negative real.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance`: the variance of a real-valued random variable as a real number.
## Main results
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_expectation_sq`: the inequality `Var[X] ≤ 𝔼[X^2]`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.meas_ge_le_variance_div_sq`: Chebyshev's inequality, i.e.,
`ℙ {ω | c ≤ |X ω - 𝔼[X]|} ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (Var[X] / c ^ 2)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.meas_ge_le_evariance_div_sq`: Chebyshev's inequality formulated with
`evariance` without requiring the random variables to be L².
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.variance_add`: the variance of the sum of two independent
random variables is the sum of the variances.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.variance_sum`: the variance of a finite sum of pairwise
independent random variables is the sum of the variances.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_sub_mul_sub`: the variance of a random variable `X` satisfying
`a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most `(b - 𝔼 X) * (𝔼 X - a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.variance_le_sq_of_bounded`: the variance of a random variable `X` satisfying
`a ≤ X ≤ b` almost everywhere is at most`((b - a) / 2) ^ 2`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {μ : Measure Ω}
variable (X μ) in
-- Porting note: Consider if `evariance` or `eVariance` is better. Also,
-- consider `eVariationOn` in `Mathlib.Analysis.BoundedVariation`.
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of a real-valued random variable defined as the Lebesgue integral of
`‖X - 𝔼[X]‖^2`. -/
def evariance : ℝ≥0∞ := ∫⁻ ω, ‖X ω - μ[X]‖ₑ ^ 2 ∂μ
variable (X μ) in
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of a real-valued random variable defined by applying `ENNReal.toReal`
to `evariance`. -/
def variance : ℝ := (evariance X μ).toReal
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the measure `μ`.
This is defined as the Lebesgue integral of `(X - 𝔼[X])^2`. -/
scoped notation "eVar[" X "; " μ "]" => ProbabilityTheory.evariance X μ
/-- The `ℝ≥0∞`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the volume
measure.
This is defined as the Lebesgue integral of `(X - 𝔼[X])^2`. -/
scoped notation "eVar[" X "]" => eVar[X; MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume]
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the measure `μ`.
It is set to `0` if `X` has infinite variance. -/
scoped notation "Var[" X "; " μ "]" => ProbabilityTheory.variance X μ
/-- The `ℝ`-valued variance of the real-valued random variable `X` according to the volume measure.
It is set to `0` if `X` has infinite variance. -/
scoped notation "Var[" X "]" => Var[X; MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume]
theorem evariance_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) : evariance X μ < ∞ := by
have := ENNReal.pow_lt_top (hX.sub <| memLp_const <| μ[X]).2 (n := 2)
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.toReal_one, one_div] at this
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ENNReal.rpow_one] at this
simp_rw [ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
exact this
lemma evariance_ne_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) : evariance X μ ≠ ∞ :=
(evariance_lt_top hX).ne
theorem evariance_eq_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hXm : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) (hX : ¬MemLp X 2 μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ := by
by_contra h
rw [← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h
have : MemLp (fun ω => X ω - μ[X]) 2 μ := by
refine ⟨hXm.sub aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top]
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_ofNat, ENNReal.toReal_one, ENNReal.rpow_two, Ne]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by linarith) h.ne
refine hX ?_
convert this.add (memLp_const μ[X])
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, sub_add_cancel]
theorem evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ < ∞ ↔ MemLp X 2 μ where
mp := by contrapose!; rw [top_le_iff]; exact evariance_eq_top hX
mpr := evariance_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias evariance_lt_top_iff_memℒp := evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp
|
lemma evariance_eq_top_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ ↔ ¬ MemLp X 2 μ := by simp [← evariance_lt_top_iff_memLp hX]
theorem ofReal_variance [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : MemLp X 2 μ) :
.ofReal (variance X μ) = evariance X μ := by
rw [variance, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact evariance_ne_top hX
protected alias _root_.MeasureTheory.MemLp.evariance_lt_top := evariance_lt_top
| Mathlib/Probability/Variance.lean | 113 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Lattice
/-!
# Disjointness and complements
This file defines `Disjoint`, `Codisjoint`, and the `IsCompl` predicate.
## Main declarations
* `Disjoint x y`: two elements of a lattice are disjoint if their `inf` is the bottom element.
* `Codisjoint x y`: two elements of a lattice are codisjoint if their `join` is the top element.
* `IsCompl x y`: In a bounded lattice, predicate for "`x` is a complement of `y`". Note that in a
non distributive lattice, an element can have several complements.
* `ComplementedLattice α`: Typeclass stating that any element of a lattice has a complement.
-/
open Function
variable {α : Type*}
section Disjoint
section PartialOrderBot
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b c d : α}
/-- Two elements of a lattice are disjoint if their inf is the bottom element.
(This generalizes disjoint sets, viewed as members of the subset lattice.)
Note that we define this without reference to `⊓`, as this allows us to talk about orders where
the infimum is not unique, or where implementing `Inf` would require additional `Decidable`
arguments. -/
def Disjoint (a b : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ≤ a → x ≤ b → x ≤ ⊥
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Disjoint a b :=
fun x _ _ ↦ le_of_eq (Subsingleton.elim x ⊥)
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint a b ↔ Disjoint b a :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_swap
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm ⦃a b : α⦄ : Disjoint a b → Disjoint b a :=
disjoint_comm.1
theorem symmetric_disjoint : Symmetric (Disjoint : α → α → Prop) :=
Disjoint.symm
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_bot_left : Disjoint ⊥ a := fun _ hbot _ ↦ hbot
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_bot_right : Disjoint a ⊥ := fun _ _ hbot ↦ hbot
theorem Disjoint.mono (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) : Disjoint b d → Disjoint a c :=
fun h _ ha hc ↦ h (ha.trans h₁) (hc.trans h₂)
theorem Disjoint.mono_left (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint b c → Disjoint a c :=
Disjoint.mono h le_rfl
theorem Disjoint.mono_right : b ≤ c → Disjoint a c → Disjoint a b :=
Disjoint.mono le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_self : Disjoint a a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hd ↦ bot_unique <| hd le_rfl le_rfl, fun h _ ha _ ↦ ha.trans_eq h⟩
/- TODO: Rename `Disjoint.eq_bot` to `Disjoint.inf_eq` and `Disjoint.eq_bot_of_self` to
`Disjoint.eq_bot` -/
alias ⟨Disjoint.eq_bot_of_self, _⟩ := disjoint_self
theorem Disjoint.ne (ha : a ≠ ⊥) (hab : Disjoint a b) : a ≠ b :=
fun h ↦ ha <| disjoint_self.1 <| by rwa [← h] at hab
theorem Disjoint.eq_bot_of_le (hab : Disjoint a b) (h : a ≤ b) : a = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| hab le_rfl h
theorem Disjoint.eq_bot_of_ge (hab : Disjoint a b) : b ≤ a → b = ⊥ :=
hab.symm.eq_bot_of_le
lemma Disjoint.eq_iff (hab : Disjoint a b) : a = b ↔ a = ⊥ ∧ b = ⊥ := by aesop
lemma Disjoint.ne_iff (hab : Disjoint a b) : a ≠ b ↔ a ≠ ⊥ ∨ b ≠ ⊥ :=
hab.eq_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot (h : a ≤ b) :
Disjoint a b ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hd ↦ hd.eq_bot_of_le h, fun h ↦ h ▸ disjoint_bot_left⟩
end PartialOrderBot
section PartialBoundedOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_top : Disjoint a ⊤ ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h ↦ bot_unique <| h le_rfl le_top, fun h _ ha _ ↦ ha.trans_eq h⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_disjoint : Disjoint ⊤ a ↔ a = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h ↦ bot_unique <| h le_top le_rfl, fun h _ _ ha ↦ ha.trans_eq h⟩
end PartialBoundedOrder
section SemilatticeInfBot
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b c : α}
theorem disjoint_iff_inf_le : Disjoint a b ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ ⊥ :=
⟨fun hd ↦ hd inf_le_left inf_le_right, fun h _ ha hb ↦ (le_inf ha hb).trans h⟩
theorem disjoint_iff : Disjoint a b ↔ a ⊓ b = ⊥ :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans le_bot_iff
theorem Disjoint.le_bot : Disjoint a b → a ⊓ b ≤ ⊥ :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mp
theorem Disjoint.eq_bot : Disjoint a b → a ⊓ b = ⊥ :=
bot_unique ∘ Disjoint.le_bot
theorem disjoint_assoc : Disjoint (a ⊓ b) c ↔ Disjoint a (b ⊓ c) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, disjoint_iff_inf_le, inf_assoc]
theorem disjoint_left_comm : Disjoint a (b ⊓ c) ↔ Disjoint b (a ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, inf_left_comm]
theorem disjoint_right_comm : Disjoint (a ⊓ b) c ↔ Disjoint (a ⊓ c) b := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, inf_right_comm]
variable (c)
theorem Disjoint.inf_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a ⊓ c) b :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem Disjoint.inf_left' (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (c ⊓ a) b :=
h.mono_left inf_le_right
theorem Disjoint.inf_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b ⊓ c) :=
h.mono_right inf_le_left
theorem Disjoint.inf_right' (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (c ⊓ b) :=
h.mono_right inf_le_right
variable {c}
theorem Disjoint.of_disjoint_inf_of_le (h : Disjoint (a ⊓ b) c) (hle : a ≤ c) : Disjoint a b :=
disjoint_iff.2 <| h.eq_bot_of_le <| inf_le_of_left_le hle
theorem Disjoint.of_disjoint_inf_of_le' (h : Disjoint (a ⊓ b) c) (hle : b ≤ c) : Disjoint a b :=
disjoint_iff.2 <| h.eq_bot_of_le <| inf_le_of_right_le hle
end SemilatticeInfBot
theorem Disjoint.right_lt_sup_of_left_ne_bot [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α}
(h : Disjoint a b) (ha : a ≠ ⊥) : b < a ⊔ b :=
le_sup_right.lt_of_ne fun eq ↦ ha (le_bot_iff.mp <| h le_rfl <| sup_eq_right.mp eq.symm)
section DistribLatticeBot
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sup_left : Disjoint (a ⊔ b) c ↔ Disjoint a c ∧ Disjoint b c := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, inf_sup_right, sup_eq_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sup_right : Disjoint a (b ⊔ c) ↔ Disjoint a b ∧ Disjoint a c := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, inf_sup_left, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem Disjoint.sup_left (ha : Disjoint a c) (hb : Disjoint b c) : Disjoint (a ⊔ b) c :=
disjoint_sup_left.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem Disjoint.sup_right (hb : Disjoint a b) (hc : Disjoint a c) : Disjoint a (b ⊔ c) :=
disjoint_sup_right.2 ⟨hb, hc⟩
theorem Disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_right (h : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hd : Disjoint a c) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans hd.le_bot bot_le) <| sup_le h le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_left (h : a ≤ c ⊔ b) (hd : Disjoint a c) : a ≤ b :=
hd.left_le_of_le_sup_right <| by rwa [sup_comm]
end DistribLatticeBot
end Disjoint
section Codisjoint
section PartialOrderTop
variable [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b c d : α}
/-- Two elements of a lattice are codisjoint if their sup is the top element.
Note that we define this without reference to `⊔`, as this allows us to talk about orders where
the supremum is not unique, or where implement `Sup` would require additional `Decidable`
arguments. -/
def Codisjoint (a b : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, a ≤ x → b ≤ x → ⊤ ≤ x
theorem codisjoint_comm : Codisjoint a b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_swap
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias Codisjoint_comm := codisjoint_comm
@[symm]
theorem Codisjoint.symm ⦃a b : α⦄ : Codisjoint a b → Codisjoint b a :=
codisjoint_comm.1
theorem symmetric_codisjoint : Symmetric (Codisjoint : α → α → Prop) :=
Codisjoint.symm
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_top_left : Codisjoint ⊤ a := fun _ htop _ ↦ htop
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_top_right : Codisjoint a ⊤ := fun _ _ htop ↦ htop
theorem Codisjoint.mono (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) : Codisjoint a c → Codisjoint b d :=
fun h _ ha hc ↦ h (h₁.trans ha) (h₂.trans hc)
theorem Codisjoint.mono_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint a c → Codisjoint b c :=
Codisjoint.mono h le_rfl
theorem Codisjoint.mono_right : b ≤ c → Codisjoint a b → Codisjoint a c :=
Codisjoint.mono le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_self : Codisjoint a a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun hd ↦ top_unique <| hd le_rfl le_rfl, fun h _ ha _ ↦ h.symm.trans_le ha⟩
/- TODO: Rename `Codisjoint.eq_top` to `Codisjoint.sup_eq` and `Codisjoint.eq_top_of_self` to
`Codisjoint.eq_top` -/
alias ⟨Codisjoint.eq_top_of_self, _⟩ := codisjoint_self
theorem Codisjoint.ne (ha : a ≠ ⊤) (hab : Codisjoint a b) : a ≠ b :=
fun h ↦ ha <| codisjoint_self.1 <| by rwa [← h] at hab
theorem Codisjoint.eq_top_of_le (hab : Codisjoint a b) (h : b ≤ a) : a = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| hab le_rfl h
theorem Codisjoint.eq_top_of_ge (hab : Codisjoint a b) : a ≤ b → b = ⊤ :=
hab.symm.eq_top_of_le
lemma Codisjoint.eq_iff (hab : Codisjoint a b) : a = b ↔ a = ⊤ ∧ b = ⊤ := by aesop
lemma Codisjoint.ne_iff (hab : Codisjoint a b) : a ≠ b ↔ a ≠ ⊤ ∨ b ≠ ⊤ :=
hab.eq_iff.not.trans not_and_or
end PartialOrderTop
section PartialBoundedOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_bot : Codisjoint a ⊥ ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ top_unique <| h le_rfl bot_le, fun h _ ha _ ↦ h.symm.trans_le ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem bot_codisjoint : Codisjoint ⊥ a ↔ a = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ top_unique <| h bot_le le_rfl, fun h _ _ ha ↦ h.symm.trans_le ha⟩
lemma Codisjoint.ne_bot_of_ne_top (h : Codisjoint a b) (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : b ≠ ⊥ := by
rintro rfl; exact ha <| by simpa using h
lemma Codisjoint.ne_bot_of_ne_top' (h : Codisjoint a b) (hb : b ≠ ⊤) : a ≠ ⊥ := by
rintro rfl; exact hb <| by simpa using h
end PartialBoundedOrder
section SemilatticeSupTop
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] {a b c : α}
theorem codisjoint_iff_le_sup : Codisjoint a b ↔ ⊤ ≤ a ⊔ b :=
@disjoint_iff_inf_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_iff : Codisjoint a b ↔ a ⊔ b = ⊤ :=
@disjoint_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem Codisjoint.top_le : Codisjoint a b → ⊤ ≤ a ⊔ b :=
@Disjoint.le_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem Codisjoint.eq_top : Codisjoint a b → a ⊔ b = ⊤ :=
@Disjoint.eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_assoc : Codisjoint (a ⊔ b) c ↔ Codisjoint a (b ⊔ c) :=
@disjoint_assoc αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_left_comm : Codisjoint a (b ⊔ c) ↔ Codisjoint b (a ⊔ c) :=
@disjoint_left_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_right_comm : Codisjoint (a ⊔ b) c ↔ Codisjoint (a ⊔ c) b :=
@disjoint_right_comm αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _
variable (c)
theorem Codisjoint.sup_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : Codisjoint (a ⊔ c) b :=
h.mono_left le_sup_left
theorem Codisjoint.sup_left' (h : Codisjoint a b) : Codisjoint (c ⊔ a) b :=
h.mono_left le_sup_right
theorem Codisjoint.sup_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : Codisjoint a (b ⊔ c) :=
h.mono_right le_sup_left
theorem Codisjoint.sup_right' (h : Codisjoint a b) : Codisjoint a (c ⊔ b) :=
h.mono_right le_sup_right
variable {c}
theorem Codisjoint.of_codisjoint_sup_of_le (h : Codisjoint (a ⊔ b) c) (hle : c ≤ a) :
Codisjoint a b :=
@Disjoint.of_disjoint_inf_of_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h hle
theorem Codisjoint.of_codisjoint_sup_of_le' (h : Codisjoint (a ⊔ b) c) (hle : c ≤ b) :
Codisjoint a b :=
@Disjoint.of_disjoint_inf_of_le' αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h hle
end SemilatticeSupTop
section DistribLatticeTop
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderTop α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_inf_left : Codisjoint (a ⊓ b) c ↔ Codisjoint a c ∧ Codisjoint b c := by
simp only [codisjoint_iff, sup_inf_right, inf_eq_top_iff]
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_inf_right : Codisjoint a (b ⊓ c) ↔ Codisjoint a b ∧ Codisjoint a c := by
simp only [codisjoint_iff, sup_inf_left, inf_eq_top_iff]
theorem Codisjoint.inf_left (ha : Codisjoint a c) (hb : Codisjoint b c) : Codisjoint (a ⊓ b) c :=
codisjoint_inf_left.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem Codisjoint.inf_right (hb : Codisjoint a b) (hc : Codisjoint a c) : Codisjoint a (b ⊓ c) :=
codisjoint_inf_right.2 ⟨hb, hc⟩
theorem Codisjoint.left_le_of_le_inf_right (h : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hd : Codisjoint b c) : a ≤ c :=
@Disjoint.left_le_of_le_sup_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ h hd.symm
theorem Codisjoint.left_le_of_le_inf_left (h : b ⊓ a ≤ c) (hd : Codisjoint b c) : a ≤ c :=
hd.left_le_of_le_inf_right <| by rwa [inf_comm]
end DistribLatticeTop
end Codisjoint
open OrderDual
theorem Disjoint.dual [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} :
Disjoint a b → Codisjoint (toDual a) (toDual b) :=
id
theorem Codisjoint.dual [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α} :
Codisjoint a b → Disjoint (toDual a) (toDual b) :=
id
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_toDual_iff [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b : α} :
Disjoint (toDual a) (toDual b) ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_ofDual_iff [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b : αᵒᵈ} :
Disjoint (ofDual a) (ofDual b) ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_toDual_iff [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} :
Codisjoint (toDual a) (toDual b) ↔ Disjoint a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_ofDual_iff [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] {a b : αᵒᵈ} :
Codisjoint (ofDual a) (ofDual b) ↔ Disjoint a b :=
Iff.rfl
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint (hab : Disjoint a b) (hbc : Codisjoint b c) : a ≤ c := by
rw [← @inf_top_eq _ _ _ a, ← @bot_sup_eq _ _ _ c, ← hab.eq_bot, ← hbc.eq_top, sup_inf_right]
exact inf_le_inf_right _ le_sup_left
end DistribLattice
section IsCompl
/-- Two elements `x` and `y` are complements of each other if `x ⊔ y = ⊤` and `x ⊓ y = ⊥`. -/
structure IsCompl [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] (x y : α) : Prop where
/-- If `x` and `y` are to be complementary in an order, they should be disjoint. -/
protected disjoint : Disjoint x y
/-- If `x` and `y` are to be complementary in an order, they should be codisjoint. -/
protected codisjoint : Codisjoint x y
theorem isCompl_iff [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] {a b : α} :
IsCompl a b ↔ Disjoint a b ∧ Codisjoint a b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
namespace IsCompl
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] {x y : α}
@[symm]
protected theorem symm (h : IsCompl x y) : IsCompl y x :=
⟨h.1.symm, h.2.symm⟩
lemma _root_.isCompl_comm : IsCompl x y ↔ IsCompl y x := ⟨IsCompl.symm, IsCompl.symm⟩
theorem dual (h : IsCompl x y) : IsCompl (toDual x) (toDual y) :=
⟨h.2, h.1⟩
theorem ofDual {a b : αᵒᵈ} (h : IsCompl a b) : IsCompl (ofDual a) (ofDual b) :=
⟨h.2, h.1⟩
end BoundedPartialOrder
section BoundedLattice
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] {x y : α}
theorem of_le (h₁ : x ⊓ y ≤ ⊥) (h₂ : ⊤ ≤ x ⊔ y) : IsCompl x y :=
⟨disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr h₁, codisjoint_iff_le_sup.mpr h₂⟩
theorem of_eq (h₁ : x ⊓ y = ⊥) (h₂ : x ⊔ y = ⊤) : IsCompl x y :=
⟨disjoint_iff.mpr h₁, codisjoint_iff.mpr h₂⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot (h : IsCompl x y) : x ⊓ y = ⊥ :=
h.disjoint.eq_bot
theorem sup_eq_top (h : IsCompl x y) : x ⊔ y = ⊤ :=
h.codisjoint.eq_top
end BoundedLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] {a b x y z : α}
theorem inf_left_le_of_le_sup_right (h : IsCompl x y) (hle : a ≤ b ⊔ y) : a ⊓ x ≤ b :=
calc
a ⊓ x ≤ (b ⊔ y) ⊓ x := inf_le_inf hle le_rfl
_ = b ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ x := inf_sup_right _ _ _
_ = b ⊓ x := by rw [h.symm.inf_eq_bot, sup_bot_eq]
_ ≤ b := inf_le_left
theorem le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le {a b} (h : IsCompl x y) : a ≤ b ⊔ y ↔ a ⊓ x ≤ b :=
⟨h.inf_left_le_of_le_sup_right, h.symm.dual.inf_left_le_of_le_sup_right⟩
theorem inf_left_eq_bot_iff (h : IsCompl y z) : x ⊓ y = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ z := by
rw [← le_bot_iff, ← h.le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le, bot_sup_eq]
theorem inf_right_eq_bot_iff (h : IsCompl y z) : x ⊓ z = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ y :=
h.symm.inf_left_eq_bot_iff
theorem disjoint_left_iff (h : IsCompl y z) : Disjoint x y ↔ x ≤ z := by
rw [disjoint_iff]
exact h.inf_left_eq_bot_iff
theorem disjoint_right_iff (h : IsCompl y z) : Disjoint x z ↔ x ≤ y :=
h.symm.disjoint_left_iff
theorem le_left_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z y :=
h.disjoint_right_iff.symm
theorem le_right_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : z ≤ y ↔ Disjoint z x :=
h.symm.le_left_iff
theorem left_le_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : x ≤ z ↔ Codisjoint z y :=
h.dual.le_left_iff
theorem right_le_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : y ≤ z ↔ Codisjoint z x :=
h.symm.left_le_iff
protected theorem Antitone {x' y'} (h : IsCompl x y) (h' : IsCompl x' y') (hx : x ≤ x') : y' ≤ y :=
h'.right_le_iff.2 <| h.symm.codisjoint.mono_right hx
theorem right_unique (hxy : IsCompl x y) (hxz : IsCompl x z) : y = z :=
le_antisymm (hxz.Antitone hxy <| le_refl x) (hxy.Antitone hxz <| le_refl x)
theorem left_unique (hxz : IsCompl x z) (hyz : IsCompl y z) : x = y :=
hxz.symm.right_unique hyz.symm
theorem sup_inf {x' y'} (h : IsCompl x y) (h' : IsCompl x' y') : IsCompl (x ⊔ x') (y ⊓ y') :=
of_eq
(by rw [inf_sup_right, ← inf_assoc, h.inf_eq_bot, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_left_comm,
h'.inf_eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
(by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm x, sup_assoc, h.sup_eq_top, sup_top_eq, top_inf_eq,
sup_assoc, sup_left_comm, h'.sup_eq_top, sup_top_eq])
theorem inf_sup {x' y'} (h : IsCompl x y) (h' : IsCompl x' y') : IsCompl (x ⊓ x') (y ⊔ y') :=
(h.symm.sup_inf h'.symm).symm
end IsCompl
namespace Prod
variable {β : Type*} [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
protected theorem disjoint_iff [OrderBot α] [OrderBot β] {x y : α × β} :
Disjoint x y ↔ Disjoint x.1 y.1 ∧ Disjoint x.2 y.2 := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun a hx hy ↦ (@h (a, ⊥) ⟨hx, ?_⟩ ⟨hy, ?_⟩).1,
fun b hx hy ↦ (@h (⊥, b) ⟨?_, hx⟩ ⟨?_, hy⟩).2⟩
all_goals exact bot_le
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩ z hza hzb
exact ⟨ha hza.1 hzb.1, hb hza.2 hzb.2⟩
protected theorem codisjoint_iff [OrderTop α] [OrderTop β] {x y : α × β} :
Codisjoint x y ↔ Codisjoint x.1 y.1 ∧ Codisjoint x.2 y.2 :=
@Prod.disjoint_iff αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
protected theorem isCompl_iff [BoundedOrder α] [BoundedOrder β] {x y : α × β} :
IsCompl x y ↔ IsCompl x.1 y.1 ∧ IsCompl x.2 y.2 := by
simp_rw [isCompl_iff, Prod.disjoint_iff, Prod.codisjoint_iff, and_and_and_comm]
end Prod
section
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] {a b x : α}
@[simp]
theorem isCompl_toDual_iff : IsCompl (toDual a) (toDual b) ↔ IsCompl a b :=
⟨IsCompl.ofDual, IsCompl.dual⟩
@[simp]
theorem isCompl_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : IsCompl (ofDual a) (ofDual b) ↔ IsCompl a b :=
⟨IsCompl.dual, IsCompl.ofDual⟩
theorem isCompl_bot_top : IsCompl (⊥ : α) ⊤ :=
IsCompl.of_eq (bot_inf_eq _) (sup_top_eq _)
theorem isCompl_top_bot : IsCompl (⊤ : α) ⊥ :=
IsCompl.of_eq (inf_bot_eq _) (top_sup_eq _)
theorem eq_top_of_isCompl_bot (h : IsCompl x ⊥) : x = ⊤ := by rw [← sup_bot_eq x, h.sup_eq_top]
theorem eq_top_of_bot_isCompl (h : IsCompl ⊥ x) : x = ⊤ :=
eq_top_of_isCompl_bot h.symm
theorem eq_bot_of_isCompl_top (h : IsCompl x ⊤) : x = ⊥ :=
eq_top_of_isCompl_bot h.dual
theorem eq_bot_of_top_isCompl (h : IsCompl ⊤ x) : x = ⊥ :=
eq_top_of_bot_isCompl h.dual
end
section IsComplemented
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α]
/-- An element is *complemented* if it has a complement. -/
def IsComplemented (a : α) : Prop :=
∃ b, IsCompl a b
theorem isComplemented_bot : IsComplemented (⊥ : α) :=
⟨⊤, isCompl_bot_top⟩
theorem isComplemented_top : IsComplemented (⊤ : α) :=
⟨⊥, isCompl_top_bot⟩
end Lattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem IsComplemented.sup : IsComplemented a → IsComplemented b → IsComplemented (a ⊔ b) :=
fun ⟨a', ha⟩ ⟨b', hb⟩ => ⟨a' ⊓ b', ha.sup_inf hb⟩
theorem IsComplemented.inf : IsComplemented a → IsComplemented b → IsComplemented (a ⊓ b) :=
fun ⟨a', ha⟩ ⟨b', hb⟩ => ⟨a' ⊔ b', ha.inf_sup hb⟩
end IsComplemented
/-- A complemented bounded lattice is one where every element has a (not necessarily unique)
complement. -/
class ComplementedLattice (α) [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] : Prop where
/-- In a `ComplementedLattice`, every element admits a complement. -/
exists_isCompl : ∀ a : α, ∃ b : α, IsCompl a b
lemma complementedLattice_iff (α) [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] :
ComplementedLattice α ↔ ∀ a : α, ∃ b : α, IsCompl a b :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
export ComplementedLattice (exists_isCompl)
instance Subsingleton.instComplementedLattice
[Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [Subsingleton α] : ComplementedLattice α := by
| refine ⟨fun a ↦ ⟨⊥, disjoint_bot_right, ?_⟩⟩
rw [Subsingleton.elim ⊥ ⊤]
exact codisjoint_top_right
namespace ComplementedLattice
variable [Lattice α] [BoundedOrder α] [ComplementedLattice α]
instance : ComplementedLattice αᵒᵈ :=
| Mathlib/Order/Disjoint.lean | 603 | 611 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Notation
/-!
# Maps between matroids
This file defines maps and comaps, which move a matroid on one type to a matroid on another
using a function between the types. The constructions are (up to isomorphism)
just combinations of restrictions and parallel extensions, so are not mathematically difficult.
Because a matroid `M : Matroid α` is defined with am embedded ground set `M.E : Set α`
which contains all the structure of `M`, there are several types of map and comap
one could reasonably ask for;
for instance, we could map `M : Matroid α` to a `Matroid β` using either
a function `f : α → β`, a function `f : ↑M.E → β` or indeed a function `f : ↑M.E → ↑E`
for some `E : Set β`. We attempt to give definitions that capture most reasonable use cases.
`Matroid.map` and `Matroid.comap` are defined in terms of bare functions rather than
functions defined on subtypes, so are often easier to work in practice than the subtype variants.
In fact, the statement that `N = Matroid.map M f _` for some `f : α → β`
is equivalent to the existence of an isomorphism from `M` to `N`,
except in the trivial degenerate case where `M` is an empty matroid on a nonempty type and `N`
is an empty matroid on an empty type.
This can be simpler to use than an actual formal isomorphism, which requires subtypes.
## Main definitions
In the definitions below, `M` and `N` are matroids on `α` and `β` respectively.
* For `f : α → β`, `Matroid.comap N f` is the matroid on `α` with ground set `f ⁻¹' N.E`
in which each `I` is independent if and only if `f` is injective on `I` and
`f '' I` is independent in `N`.
(For each nonloop `x` of `N`, the set `f ⁻¹' {x}` is a parallel class of `N.comap f`)
* `Matroid.comapOn N f E` is the restriction of `N.comap f` to `E` for some `E : Set α`.
* For an embedding `f : M.E ↪ β` defined on the subtype `↑M.E`,
`Matroid.mapSetEmbedding M f` is the matroid on `β` with ground set `range f`
whose independent sets are the images of those in `M`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M`.
* For a function `f : α → β` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on `M.E`,
`Matroid.map f hf` is the matroid on `β` with ground set `f '' M.E`
whose independent sets are the images of those in `M`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M`,
and does not depend on the values `f` takes outside `M.E`.
* `Matroid.mapEmbedding f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : α ↪ β` is a bundled embedding.
It is defined separately because the global injectivity of `f` gives some nicer `simp` lemmas.
* `Matroid.mapEquiv f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : α ≃ β` is a bundled equivalence.
It is defined separately because we get even nicer `simp` lemmas.
* `Matroid.mapSetEquiv f` is a version of `Matroid.map` where `f : M.E ≃ E` is an equivalence on
subtypes. It gives a matroid on `β` with ground set `E`.
* For `X : Set α`, `Matroid.restrictSubtype M X` is the `Matroid ↥X` with ground set
`univ : Set ↥X`. This matroid is isomorphic to `M ↾ X`.
## Implementation details
The definition of `comap` is the only place where we need to actually define a matroid from scratch.
After `comap` is defined, we can define `map` and its variants indirectly in terms of `comap`.
If `f : α → β` is injective on `M.E`, the independent sets of `M.map f hf` are the images of
the independent set of `M`; i.e. `(M.map f hf).Indep I ↔ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀`.
But if `f` is globally injective, we can phrase this more directly;
indeed, `(M.map f _).Indep I ↔ M.Indep (f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f`.
If `f` is an equivalence we have `(M.map f _).Indep I ↔ M.Indep (f.symm '' I)`.
In order that these stronger statements can be `@[simp]`,
we define `mapEmbedding` and `mapEquiv` separately from `map`.
## Notes
For finite matroids, both maps and comaps are a special case of a construction of
Perfect [perfect1969matroid] in which a matroid structure can be transported across an arbitrary
bipartite graph that may not correspond to a function at all (See [oxley2011], Theorem 11.2.12).
It would have been nice to use this more general construction as a basis for the definition
of both `Matroid.map` and `Matroid.comap`.
Unfortunately, we can't do this, because the construction doesn't extend to infinite matroids.
Specifically, if `M₁` and `M₂` are matroids on the same type `α`,
and `f` is the natural function from `α ⊕ α` to `α`,
then the images under `f` of the independent sets of the direct sum `M₁ ⊕ M₂` are
the independent sets of a matroid if and only if the union of `M₁` and `M₂` is a matroid,
and unions do not exist for some pairs of infinite matroids: see [aignerhorev2012infinite].
For this reason, `Matroid.map` requires injectivity to be well-defined in general.
## TODO
* Bundled matroid isomorphisms.
* Maps of finite matroids across bipartite graphs.
## References
* [E. Aigner-Horev, J. Carmesin, J. Fröhlic, Infinite Matroid Union][aignerhorev2012infinite]
* [H. Perfect, Independence Spaces and Combinatorial Problems][perfect1969matroid]
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set Function Set.Notation
namespace Matroid
variable {α β : Type*} {f : α → β} {E I : Set α} {M : Matroid α} {N : Matroid β}
section comap
/-- The pullback of a matroid on `β` by a function `f : α → β` to a matroid on `α`.
Elements with the same (nonloop) image are parallel and the ground set is `f ⁻¹' M.E`.
The matroids `M.comap f` and `M ↾ range f` have isomorphic simplifications;
the preimage of each nonloop of `M ↾ range f` is a parallel class. -/
def comap (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : Matroid α :=
IndepMatroid.matroid <|
{ E := f ⁻¹' N.E
Indep := fun I ↦ N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I
indep_empty := by simp
indep_subset := fun _ _ h hIJ ↦ ⟨h.1.subset (image_subset _ hIJ), InjOn.mono hIJ h.2⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I B ⟨hI, hIinj⟩ hImax hBmax
obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hI'inj⟩ := (not_maximal_subset_iff ⟨hI, hIinj⟩).1 hImax
have h₁ : ¬(N ↾ range f).IsBase (f '' I) := by
refine fun hB ↦ hII'.ne ?_
have h_im := hB.eq_of_subset_indep (by simpa) (image_subset _ hII'.subset)
rwa [hI'inj.image_eq_image_iff hII'.subset Subset.rfl] at h_im
have h₂ : (N ↾ range f).IsBase (f '' B) := by
refine Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (by simpa using hBmax.1.1) ?_
rintro _ ⟨⟨e, heB, rfl⟩, hfe⟩ hi
rw [restrict_indep_iff, ← image_insert_eq] at hi
have hinj : InjOn f (insert e B) := by
rw [injOn_insert (fun heB ↦ hfe (mem_image_of_mem f heB))]
exact ⟨hBmax.1.2, hfe⟩
refine hBmax.not_prop_of_ssuperset (t := insert e B) (ssubset_insert ?_) ⟨hi.1, hinj⟩
exact fun heB ↦ hfe <| mem_image_of_mem f heB
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟨e, he, rfl⟩, he'⟩, hei⟩ := Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (by simpa) h₁ h₂
have heI : e ∉ I := fun heI ↦ he' (mem_image_of_mem f heI)
rw [← image_insert_eq, restrict_indep_iff] at hei
exact ⟨e, ⟨he, heI⟩, hei.1, (injOn_insert heI).2 ⟨hIinj, he'⟩⟩
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I ⟨hI, hIinj⟩ hIX
obtain ⟨J, hJ⟩ := (N ↾ range f).existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (f '' X) (by simp)
(f '' I) (by simpa) (image_subset _ hIX)
simp only [restrict_indep_iff, image_subset_iff, maximal_subset_iff, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
and_assoc] at hJ ⊢
obtain ⟨hIJ, hJ, hJf, hJX, hJmax⟩ := hJ
obtain ⟨J₀, hIJ₀, hJ₀X, hbj⟩ := hIinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hIX
(image_subset f hIJ) (image_subset_iff.2 <| preimage_mono hJX)
obtain rfl : f '' J₀ = J := by rw [← image_preimage_eq_of_subset hJf, hbj.image_eq]
refine ⟨J₀, hIJ₀, hJ, hbj.injOn, hJ₀X, fun K hK hKinj hKX hJ₀K ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← hKinj.image_eq_image_iff hJ₀K Subset.rfl, hJmax hK (image_subset_range _ _)
(image_subset f hKX) (image_subset f hJ₀K)]
subset_ground := fun _ hI e heI ↦ hI.1.subset_ground ⟨e, heI, rfl⟩ }
@[simp] lemma comap_indep_iff : (N.comap f).Indep I ↔ N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_ground_eq (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).E = f ⁻¹' N.E := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_dep_iff :
(N.comap f).Dep I ↔ N.Dep (f '' I) ∨ (N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ ¬ InjOn f I) := by
rw [Dep, comap_indep_iff, not_and, comap_ground_eq, Dep, image_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨hi, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [and_iff_left h, ← imp_iff_not_or]
exact fun hI ↦ ⟨hI, hi hI⟩
rintro (⟨hI, hIE⟩ | hI)
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ (hI h).elim, hIE⟩
rw [iff_true_intro hI.1, iff_true_intro hI.2, implies_true, true_and]
simpa using hI.1.subset_ground
@[simp] lemma comap_id (N : Matroid β) : N.comap id = N :=
ext_indep rfl <| by simp [injective_id.injOn]
lemma comap_indep_iff_of_injOn (hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' N.E)) :
(N.comap f).Indep I ↔ N.Indep (f '' I) := by
rw [comap_indep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
refine fun hi ↦ hf.mono <| subset_trans ?_ (preimage_mono hi.subset_ground)
apply subset_preimage_image
@[simp] lemma comap_emptyOn (f : α → β) : comap (emptyOn β) f = emptyOn α := by
simp [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma comap_loopyOn (f : α → β) (E : Set β) : comap (loopyOn E) f = loopyOn (f ⁻¹' E) := by
rw [eq_loopyOn_iff]; aesop
@[simp] lemma comap_isBasis_iff {I X : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBasis I X ↔ N.IsBasis (f '' I) (f '' X) ∧ I.InjOn f ∧ I ⊆ X := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hI, hinj⟩ := comap_indep_iff.1 h.indep
refine ⟨hI.isBasis_of_forall_insert (image_subset f h.subset) fun e he ↦ ?_, hinj, h.subset⟩
simp only [mem_diff, mem_image, not_exists, not_and, and_imp, forall_exists_index,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂] at he
obtain ⟨⟨e, heX, rfl⟩, he⟩ := he
have heI : e ∉ I := fun heI ↦ (he e heI rfl)
replace h := h.insert_dep ⟨heX, heI⟩
simp only [comap_dep_iff, image_insert_eq, or_iff_not_imp_right, injOn_insert heI,
hinj, mem_image, not_exists, not_and, true_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp, not_not] at h
exact h (fun _ ↦ he)
refine Indep.isBasis_of_forall_insert ?_ h.2.2 fun e ⟨heX, heI⟩ ↦ ?_
· simp [comap_indep_iff, h.1.indep, h.2]
have hIE : insert e I ⊆ (N.comap f).E := by
simp_rw [comap_ground_eq, ← image_subset_iff]
exact (image_subset _ (insert_subset heX h.2.2)).trans h.1.subset_ground
suffices N.Indep (insert (f e) (f '' I)) → ∃ x ∈ I, f x = f e
by simpa [← not_indep_iff hIE, injOn_insert heI, h.2.1, image_insert_eq]
exact h.1.mem_of_insert_indep (mem_image_of_mem f heX)
@[simp] lemma comap_isBase_iff {B : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBasis (f '' B) (f '' (f ⁻¹' N.E)) ∧ B.InjOn f ∧ B ⊆ f ⁻¹' N.E := by
rw [← isBasis_ground_iff, comap_isBasis_iff]; rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_isBasis'_iff {I X : Set α} :
(N.comap f).IsBasis' I X ↔ N.IsBasis' (f '' I) (f '' X) ∧ I.InjOn f ∧ I ⊆ X := by
simp only [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground, comap_ground_eq, comap_isBasis_iff,
image_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← and_assoc, and_congr_left_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp,
and_imp]
exact fun h _ _ ↦ (image_subset_iff.1 h.indep.subset_ground)
instance comap_finitary (N : Matroid β) [N.Finitary] (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).Finitary := by
refine ⟨fun I hI ↦ ?_⟩
rw [comap_indep_iff, indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep]
simp only [forall_subset_image_iff]
refine ⟨fun J hJ hfin ↦ ?_,
fun x hx y hy ↦ (hI _ (pair_subset hx hy) (by simp)).2 (by simp) (by simp)⟩
obtain ⟨J', hJ'J, hJ'⟩ := (surjOn_image f J).exists_bijOn_subset
rw [← hJ'.image_eq] at hfin ⊢
exact (hI J' (hJ'J.trans hJ) (hfin.of_finite_image hJ'.injOn)).1
instance comap_rankFinite (N : Matroid β) [N.RankFinite] (f : α → β) : (N.comap f).RankFinite := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := (N.comap f).exists_isBase
refine hB.rankFinite_of_finite ?_
simp only [comap_isBase_iff] at hB
exact (hB.1.indep.finite.of_finite_image hB.2.1)
end comap
section comapOn
variable {E B I : Set α}
/-- The pullback of a matroid on `β` by a function `f : α → β` to a matroid on `α`,
restricted to a ground set `E`.
The matroids `M.comapOn f E` and `M ↾ (f '' E)` have isomorphic simplifications;
elements with the same nonloop image are parallel. -/
def comapOn (N : Matroid β) (E : Set α) (f : α → β) : Matroid α := (N.comap f) ↾ E
lemma comapOn_preimage_eq (N : Matroid β) (f : α → β) : N.comapOn (f ⁻¹' N.E) f = N.comap f := by
rw [comapOn, restrict_eq_self_iff]; rfl
@[simp] lemma comapOn_indep_iff :
(N.comapOn E f).Indep I ↔ (N.Indep (f '' I) ∧ InjOn f I ∧ I ⊆ E) := by
simp [comapOn, and_assoc]
@[simp] lemma comapOn_ground_eq : (N.comapOn E f).E = E := rfl
lemma comapOn_isBase_iff :
(N.comapOn E f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBasis' (f '' B) (f '' E) ∧ B.InjOn f ∧ B ⊆ E := by
rw [comapOn, isBase_restrict_iff', comap_isBasis'_iff]
lemma comapOn_isBase_iff_of_surjOn (h : SurjOn f E N.E) :
(N.comapOn E f).IsBase B ↔ (N.IsBase (f '' B) ∧ InjOn f B ∧ B ⊆ E) := by
simp_rw [comapOn_isBase_iff, and_congr_left_iff, and_imp, isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h, isBasis_ground_iff, implies_true]
lemma comapOn_isBase_iff_of_bijOn (h : BijOn f E N.E) :
(N.comapOn E f).IsBase B ↔ N.IsBase (f '' B) ∧ B ⊆ E := by
rw [← and_iff_left_of_imp (IsBase.subset_ground (M := N.comapOn E f) (B := B)),
comapOn_ground_eq, and_congr_left_iff]
suffices h' : B ⊆ E → InjOn f B from fun hB ↦
by simp [hB, comapOn_isBase_iff_of_surjOn h.surjOn, h']
exact fun hBE ↦ h.injOn.mono hBE
lemma comapOn_dual_eq_of_bijOn (h : BijOn f E N.E) :
(N.comapOn E f)✶ = N✶.comapOn E f := by
refine ext_isBase (by simp) (fun B hB ↦ ?_)
rw [comapOn_isBase_iff_of_bijOn (by simpa), dual_isBase_iff, comapOn_isBase_iff_of_bijOn h,
dual_isBase_iff _, comapOn_ground_eq, and_iff_left diff_subset, and_iff_left (by simpa),
h.injOn.image_diff_subset (by simpa), h.image_eq]
exact (h.mapsTo.mono_left (show B ⊆ E by simpa)).image_subset
instance comapOn_finitary [N.Finitary] : (N.comapOn E f).Finitary := by
rw [comapOn]; infer_instance
instance comapOn_rankFinite [N.RankFinite] : (N.comapOn E f).RankFinite := by
rw [comapOn]; infer_instance
end comapOn
section mapSetEmbedding
/-- Map a matroid `M` to an isomorphic copy in `β` using an embedding `M.E ↪ β`. -/
def mapSetEmbedding (M : Matroid α) (f : M.E ↪ β) : Matroid β := Matroid.ofExistsMatroid
(E := range f)
(Indep := fun I ↦ M.Indep ↑(f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f)
(hM := by
classical
obtain (rfl | ⟨⟨e,he⟩⟩) := eq_emptyOn_or_nonempty M
· refine ⟨emptyOn β, ?_⟩
simp only [emptyOn_ground] at f
simp [range_eq_empty f, subset_empty_iff]
have _ : Nonempty M.E := ⟨⟨e,he⟩⟩
have _ : Nonempty α := ⟨e⟩
refine ⟨M.comapOn (range f) (fun x ↦ ↑(invFunOn f univ x)), rfl, ?_⟩
simp_rw [comapOn_indep_iff, ← and_assoc, and_congr_left_iff, subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq]
rintro _ ⟨I, rfl⟩
rw [← image_image, InjOn.invFunOn_image f.injective.injOn (subset_univ _),
preimage_image_eq _ f.injective, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro - x hx y hy
simp only [EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, Subtype.val_inj]
exact (invFunOn_injOn_image f univ) (image_subset f (subset_univ I) hx)
(image_subset f (subset_univ I) hy) )
@[simp] lemma mapSetEmbedding_ground (M : Matroid α) (f : M.E ↪ β) :
(M.mapSetEmbedding f).E = range f := rfl
@[simp] lemma mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff {f : M.E ↪ β} {I : Set β} :
(M.mapSetEmbedding f).Indep I ↔ M.Indep ↑(f ⁻¹' I) ∧ I ⊆ range f := Iff.rfl
lemma Indep.exists_eq_image_of_mapSetEmbedding {f : M.E ↪ β} {I : Set β}
(hI : (M.mapSetEmbedding f).Indep I) : ∃ (I₀ : Set M.E), M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀ :=
⟨f ⁻¹' I, hI.1, Eq.symm <| image_preimage_eq_of_subset hI.2⟩
lemma mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff' {f : M.E ↪ β} {I : Set β} :
(M.mapSetEmbedding f).Indep I ↔ ∃ (I₀ : Set M.E), M.Indep ↑I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀ := by
simp only [mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff, subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hI, I, rfl⟩
exact ⟨I, by rwa [preimage_image_eq _ f.injective] at hI, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨I, hI, rfl⟩
rw [preimage_image_eq _ f.injective]
exact ⟨hI, _, rfl⟩
end mapSetEmbedding
section map
/-- Given a function `f` that is injective on `M.E`, the copy of `M` in `β` whose independent sets
are the images of those in `M`. If `β` is a nonempty type, then `N : Matroid β` is a map of `M`
if and only if `M` and `N` are isomorphic. -/
def map (M : Matroid α) (f : α → β) (hf : InjOn f M.E) : Matroid β := Matroid.ofExistsMatroid
(E := f '' M.E)
(Indep := fun I ↦ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀)
(hM := by
refine ⟨M.mapSetEmbedding ⟨_, hf.injective⟩, by simp, fun I ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mapSetEmbedding_indep_iff', Embedding.coeFn_mk, restrict_apply,
← image_image f Subtype.val, Subtype.exists_set_subtype (p := fun J ↦ M.Indep J ∧ I = f '' J)]
exact ⟨fun ⟨I₀, _, hI₀⟩ ↦ ⟨I₀, hI₀⟩, fun ⟨I₀, hI₀⟩ ↦ ⟨I₀, hI₀.1.subset_ground, hI₀⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma map_ground (M : Matroid α) (f : α → β) (hf) : (M.map f hf).E = f '' M.E := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_indep_iff {hf} {I : Set β} :
(M.map f hf).Indep I ↔ ∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ I = f '' I₀ := Iff.rfl
lemma Indep.map (hI : M.Indep I) (f : α → β) (hf) : (M.map f hf).Indep (f '' I) :=
map_indep_iff.2 ⟨I, hI, rfl⟩
lemma Indep.exists_bijOn_of_map {I : Set β} (hf) (hI : (M.map f hf).Indep I) :
∃ I₀, M.Indep I₀ ∧ BijOn f I₀ I := by
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀, rfl⟩ := hI
exact ⟨I₀, hI₀, (hf.mono hI₀.subset_ground).bijOn_image⟩
lemma map_image_indep_iff {hf} {I : Set α} (hI : I ⊆ M.E) :
(M.map f hf).Indep (f '' I) ↔ M.Indep I := by
rw [map_indep_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨I, h, rfl⟩⟩
rw [hf.image_eq_image_iff hI hJ.subset_ground] at hIJ; rwa [hIJ]
@[simp] lemma map_isBase_iff (M : Matroid α) (f : α → β) (hf) {B : Set β} :
(M.map f hf).IsBase B ↔ ∃ B₀, M.IsBase B₀ ∧ B = f '' B₀ := by
rw [isBase_iff_maximal_indep]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨B₀, hB₀, hbij⟩ := h.prop.exists_bijOn_of_map
refine ⟨B₀, hB₀.isBase_of_maximal fun J hJ hB₀J ↦ ?_, hbij.image_eq.symm⟩
rw [← hf.image_eq_image_iff hB₀.subset_ground hJ.subset_ground, hbij.image_eq]
exact h.eq_of_subset (hJ.map f hf) (hbij.image_eq ▸ image_subset f hB₀J)
rintro ⟨B, hB, rfl⟩
rw [maximal_subset_iff]
refine ⟨hB.indep.map f hf, fun I hI hBI ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀, hbij⟩ := hI.exists_bijOn_of_map
rw [← hbij.image_eq, hf.image_subset_image_iff hB.subset_ground hI₀.subset_ground] at hBI
rw [hB.eq_of_subset_indep hI₀ hBI, hbij.image_eq]
lemma IsBase.map {B : Set α} (hB : M.IsBase B) {f : α → β} (hf) : (M.map f hf).IsBase (f '' B) := by
rw [map_isBase_iff]; exact ⟨B, hB, rfl⟩
lemma map_dep_iff {hf} {D : Set β} :
(M.map f hf).Dep D ↔ ∃ D₀, M.Dep D₀ ∧ D = f '' D₀ := by
simp only [Dep, map_indep_iff, not_exists, not_and, map_ground, subset_image_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨h, D₀, hD₀E, rfl⟩
exact ⟨D₀, ⟨fun hd ↦ h _ hd rfl, hD₀E⟩, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨D₀, ⟨hD₀, hD₀E⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun I hI h_eq ↦ ?_, ⟨_, hD₀E, rfl⟩⟩
rw [hf.image_eq_image_iff hD₀E hI.subset_ground] at h_eq
subst h_eq; contradiction
|
lemma map_image_isBase_iff {hf} {B : Set α} (hB : B ⊆ M.E) :
(M.map f hf).IsBase (f '' B) ↔ M.IsBase B := by
rw [map_isBase_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨B, h, rfl⟩⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Map.lean | 402 | 406 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Felix Weilacher. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.PiNat
/-!
# (Topological) Schemes and their induced maps
In topology, and especially descriptive set theory, one often constructs functions `(ℕ → β) → α`,
where α is some topological space and β is a discrete space, as an appropriate limit of some map
`List β → Set α`. We call the latter type of map a "`β`-scheme on `α`".
This file develops the basic, abstract theory of these schemes and the functions they induce.
## Main Definitions
* `CantorScheme.inducedMap A` : The aforementioned "limit" of a scheme `A : List β → Set α`.
This is a partial function from `ℕ → β` to `a`,
implemented here as an object of type `Σ s : Set (ℕ → β), s → α`.
That is, `(inducedMap A).1` is the domain and `(inducedMap A).2` is the function.
## Implementation Notes
We consider end-appending to be the fundamental way to build lists (say on `β`) inductively,
as this interacts better with the topology on `ℕ → β`.
As a result, functions like `List.get?` or `Stream'.take` do not have their intended meaning
in this file. See instead `PiNat.res`.
## References
* [kechris1995] (Chapters 6-7)
## Tags
scheme, cantor scheme, lusin scheme, approximation.
-/
namespace CantorScheme
open List Function Filter Set PiNat Topology
variable {β α : Type*} (A : List β → Set α)
/-- From a `β`-scheme on `α` `A`, we define a partial function from `(ℕ → β)` to `α`
which sends each infinite sequence `x` to an element of the intersection along the
branch corresponding to `x`, if it exists.
We call this the map induced by the scheme. -/
noncomputable def inducedMap : Σs : Set (ℕ → β), s → α :=
⟨fun x => Set.Nonempty (⋂ n : ℕ, A (res x n)), fun x => x.property.some⟩
section Topology
/-- A scheme is antitone if each set contains its children. -/
protected def Antitone : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, ∀ a : β, A (a :: l) ⊆ A l
/-- A useful strengthening of being antitone is to require that each set contains
the closure of each of its children. -/
def ClosureAntitone [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, ∀ a : β, closure (A (a :: l)) ⊆ A l
/-- A scheme is disjoint if the children of each set of pairwise disjoint. -/
protected def Disjoint : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, Pairwise fun a b => Disjoint (A (a :: l)) (A (b :: l))
variable {A}
/-- If `x` is in the domain of the induced map of a scheme `A`,
its image under this map is in each set along the corresponding branch. -/
theorem map_mem (x : (inducedMap A).1) (n : ℕ) : (inducedMap A).2 x ∈ A (res x n) := by
have := x.property.some_mem
rw [mem_iInter] at this
exact this n
protected theorem ClosureAntitone.antitone [TopologicalSpace α] (hA : ClosureAntitone A) :
CantorScheme.Antitone A := fun l a => subset_closure.trans (hA l a)
protected theorem Antitone.closureAntitone [TopologicalSpace α] (hanti : CantorScheme.Antitone A)
(hclosed : ∀ l, IsClosed (A l)) : ClosureAntitone A := fun _ _ =>
(hclosed _).closure_eq.subset.trans (hanti _ _)
/-- A scheme where the children of each set are pairwise disjoint induces an injective map. -/
theorem Disjoint.map_injective (hA : CantorScheme.Disjoint A) : Injective (inducedMap A).2 := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
refine Subtype.coe_injective (res_injective ?_)
dsimp
ext n : 1
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨?_, ih⟩
contrapose hA
simp only [CantorScheme.Disjoint, _root_.Pairwise, Ne, not_forall, exists_prop]
refine ⟨res x n, _, _, hA, ?_⟩
rw [not_disjoint_iff]
refine ⟨(inducedMap A).2 ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← res_succ]
apply map_mem
rw [hxy, ih, ← res_succ]
apply map_mem
end Topology
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- A scheme on a metric space has vanishing diameter if diameter approaches 0 along each branch. -/
def VanishingDiam : Prop :=
∀ x : ℕ → β, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => EMetric.diam (A (res x n))) atTop (𝓝 0)
variable {A}
theorem VanishingDiam.dist_lt (hA : VanishingDiam A) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (x : ℕ → β) :
∃ n : ℕ, ∀ (y) (_ : y ∈ A (res x n)) (z) (_ : z ∈ A (res x n)), dist y z < ε := by
specialize hA x
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at hA
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hA (ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2)) (by
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]; linarith)
use n
intro y hy z hz
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos, ← edist_dist]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hy hz)
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (hn _ (le_refl _))
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos]
linarith
/-- A scheme with vanishing diameter along each branch induces a continuous map. -/
theorem VanishingDiam.map_continuous [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β]
(hA : VanishingDiam A) : Continuous (inducedMap A).2 := by
rw [Metric.continuous_iff']
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hA.dist_lt _ ε_pos x
rw [_root_.eventually_nhds_iff]
refine ⟨(↑)⁻¹' cylinder x n, ?_, ?_, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ hyx
rw [mem_preimage, Subtype.coe_mk, cylinder_eq_res, mem_setOf] at hyx
apply hn
· rw [← hyx]
apply map_mem
apply map_mem
apply continuous_subtype_val.isOpen_preimage
apply isOpen_cylinder
|
/-- A scheme on a complete space with vanishing diameter
such that each set contains the closure of its children
induces a total map. -/
theorem ClosureAntitone.map_of_vanishingDiam [CompleteSpace α] (hdiam : VanishingDiam A)
(hanti : ClosureAntitone A) (hnonempty : ∀ l, (A l).Nonempty) : (inducedMap A).1 = univ := by
rw [eq_univ_iff_forall]
intro x
choose u hu using fun n => hnonempty (res x n)
have umem : ∀ n m : ℕ, n ≤ m → u m ∈ A (res x n) := by
have : Antitone fun n : ℕ => A (res x n) := by
refine antitone_nat_of_succ_le ?_
intro n
apply hanti.antitone
intro n m hnm
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/CantorScheme.lean | 148 | 162 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
| · right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 202 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentialImage
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Slice
/-!
# Equivalence of categories
An equivalence of categories `C` and `D` is a pair of functors `F : C ⥤ D` and `G : D ⥤ C` such
that `η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G` and `ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D`. In many situations, equivalences are a better
notion of "sameness" of categories than the stricter isomorphism of categories.
Recall that one way to express that two functors `F : C ⥤ D` and `G : D ⥤ C` are adjoint is using
two natural transformations `η : 𝟭 C ⟶ F ⋙ G` and `ε : G ⋙ F ⟶ 𝟭 D`, called the unit and the
counit, such that the compositions `F ⟶ FGF ⟶ F` and `G ⟶ GFG ⟶ G` are the identity. Unfortunately,
it is not the case that the natural isomorphisms `η` and `ε` in the definition of an equivalence
automatically give an adjunction. However, it is true that
* if one of the two compositions is the identity, then so is the other, and
* given an equivalence of categories, it is always possible to refine `η` in such a way that the
identities are satisfied.
For this reason, in mathlib we define an equivalence to be a "half-adjoint equivalence", which is
a tuple `(F, G, η, ε)` as in the first paragraph such that the composite `F ⟶ FGF ⟶ F` is the
identity. By the remark above, this already implies that the tuple is an "adjoint equivalence",
i.e., that the composite `G ⟶ GFG ⟶ G` is also the identity.
We also define essentially surjective functors and show that a functor is an equivalence if and only
if it is full, faithful and essentially surjective.
## Main definitions
* `Equivalence`: bundled (half-)adjoint equivalences of categories
* `Functor.EssSurj`: type class on a functor `F` containing the data of the preimages
and the isomorphisms `F.obj (preimage d) ≅ d`.
* `Functor.IsEquivalence`: type class on a functor `F` which is full, faithful and
essentially surjective.
## Main results
* `Equivalence.mk`: upgrade an equivalence to a (half-)adjoint equivalence
* `isEquivalence_iff_of_iso`: when `F` and `G` are isomorphic functors,
`F` is an equivalence iff `G` is.
* `Functor.asEquivalenceFunctor`: construction of an equivalence of categories from
a functor `F` which satisfies the property `F.IsEquivalence` (i.e. `F` is full, faithful
and essentially surjective).
## Notations
We write `C ≌ D` (`\backcong`, not to be confused with `≅`/`\cong`) for a bundled equivalence.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor NatIso Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
/-- We define an equivalence as a (half)-adjoint equivalence, a pair of functors with
a unit and counit which are natural isomorphisms and the triangle law `Fη ≫ εF = 1`, or in other
words the composite `F ⟶ FGF ⟶ F` is the identity.
In `unit_inverse_comp`, we show that this is actually an adjoint equivalence, i.e., that the
composite `G ⟶ GFG ⟶ G` is also the identity.
The triangle equation is written as a family of equalities between morphisms, it is more
complicated if we write it as an equality of natural transformations, because then we would have
to insert natural transformations like `F ⟶ F1`. -/
@[ext, stacks 001J]
structure Equivalence (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] where mk' ::
/-- A functor in one direction -/
functor : C ⥤ D
/-- A functor in the other direction -/
inverse : D ⥤ C
/-- The composition `functor ⋙ inverse` is isomorphic to the identity -/
unitIso : 𝟭 C ≅ functor ⋙ inverse
/-- The composition `inverse ⋙ functor` is also isomorphic to the identity -/
counitIso : inverse ⋙ functor ≅ 𝟭 D
/-- The natural isomorphisms compose to the identity. -/
functor_unitIso_comp :
∀ X : C, functor.map (unitIso.hom.app X) ≫ counitIso.hom.app (functor.obj X) =
𝟙 (functor.obj X) := by aesop_cat
/-- We infix the usual notation for an equivalence -/
infixr:10 " ≌ " => Equivalence
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Equivalence
/-- The unit of an equivalence of categories. -/
abbrev unit (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 C ⟶ e.functor ⋙ e.inverse :=
e.unitIso.hom
/-- The counit of an equivalence of categories. -/
abbrev counit (e : C ≌ D) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⟶ 𝟭 D :=
e.counitIso.hom
/-- The inverse of the unit of an equivalence of categories. -/
abbrev unitInv (e : C ≌ D) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
e.unitIso.inv
/-- The inverse of the counit of an equivalence of categories. -/
abbrev counitInv (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 D ⟶ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor :=
e.counitIso.inv
/- While these abbreviations are convenient, they also cause some trouble,
preventing structure projections from unfolding. -/
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unit = unit_iso.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counit = counit_iso.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unitInv = unit_iso.inv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counitInv = counit_iso.inv :=
rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem counit_naturality (e : C ≌ D) {X Y : D} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.functor.map (e.inverse.map f) ≫ e.counit.app Y = e.counit.app X ≫ f :=
e.counit.naturality f
@[reassoc]
theorem unit_naturality (e : C ≌ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.unit.app X ≫ e.inverse.map (e.functor.map f) = f ≫ e.unit.app Y :=
(e.unit.naturality f).symm
@[reassoc]
theorem counitInv_naturality (e : C ≌ D) {X Y : D} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.counitInv.app X ≫ e.functor.map (e.inverse.map f) = f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y :=
(e.counitInv.naturality f).symm
@[reassoc]
theorem unitInv_naturality (e : C ≌ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.inverse.map (e.functor.map f) ≫ e.unitInv.app Y = e.unitInv.app X ≫ f :=
e.unitInv.naturality f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem functor_unit_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) ≫ e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) :=
e.functor_unitIso_comp X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counitInv_functor_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) ≫ e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) := by
simpa using Iso.inv_eq_inv
(e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X) ≪≫ e.counitIso.app (e.functor.obj X)) (Iso.refl _)
theorem counitInv_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) := by
symm
simp only [id_obj, comp_obj, counitInv]
rw [← Iso.app_inv, ← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.counitIso.app _), Iso.app_hom, functor_unit_comp]
rfl
theorem counit_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
simpa using Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X)) (f := e.counit.app _)
/-- The other triangle equality. The proof follows the following proof in Globular:
http://globular.science/1905.001 -/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem unit_inverse_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≫ e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
rw [← id_comp (e.inverse.map _), ← map_id e.inverse, ← counitInv_functor_comp, map_comp]
dsimp
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.unitIso.app _) (e.inverse.map (e.functor.map _)), Iso.app_hom,
Iso.app_inv]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← e.unit_naturality]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← e.unit_naturality]
slice_lhs 4 4 =>
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app _)) (e.unitInv.app _)]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
dsimp only [Functor.mapIso_hom, Iso.app_hom]
rw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counit_naturality, e.counitIso.hom_inv_id_app]
dsimp only [Functor.comp_obj]
rw [map_id]
dsimp only [comp_obj, id_obj]
rw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
dsimp only [Functor.mapIso_inv, Iso.app_inv]
rw [← map_comp e.inverse, ← e.counitInv_naturality, map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [e.unitInv_naturality]
slice_lhs 4 5 =>
rw [← map_comp e.inverse, ← map_comp e.functor, e.unitIso.hom_inv_id_app]
dsimp only [Functor.id_obj]
rw [map_id, map_id]
dsimp only [comp_obj, id_obj]
rw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [← e.unitInv_naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
rw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counitInv_naturality, e.counitIso.hom_inv_id_app]
dsimp only [Functor.comp_obj]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inverse_counitInv_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) ≫ e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
simpa using Iso.inv_eq_inv
(e.unitIso.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≪≫ e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y)) (Iso.refl _)
theorem unit_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) := by
simpa using Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y)) (f := e.unit.app _)
theorem unitInv_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) := by
rw [← Iso.app_inv, ← Iso.app_hom, ← mapIso_hom, Eq.comm, ← Iso.hom_eq_inv]
simpa using unit_app_inverse e Y
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem fun_inv_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : D) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.functor.map (e.inverse.map f) = e.counit.app X ≫ f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_2 e.counitIso f).symm
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem inv_fun_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.inverse.map (e.functor.map f) = e.unitInv.app X ≫ f ≫ e.unit.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_1 e.unitIso f).symm
section
-- In this section we convert an arbitrary equivalence to a half-adjoint equivalence.
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D)
/-- If `η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G` is part of a (not necessarily half-adjoint) equivalence, we can upgrade it
to a refined natural isomorphism `adjointifyη η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G` which exhibits the properties
required for a half-adjoint equivalence. See `Equivalence.mk`. -/
def adjointifyη : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := by
calc
𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := η
_ ≅ F ⋙ 𝟭 D ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (leftUnitor G).symm
_ ≅ F ⋙ (G ⋙ F) ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (isoWhiskerRight ε.symm G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (associator G F G)
_ ≅ (F ⋙ G) ⋙ F ⋙ G := (associator F G (F ⋙ G)).symm
_ ≅ 𝟭 C ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerRight η.symm (F ⋙ G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G := leftUnitor (F ⋙ G)
@[reassoc]
theorem adjointify_η_ε (X : C) :
F.map ((adjointifyη η ε).hom.app X) ≫ ε.hom.app (F.obj X) = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := by
dsimp [adjointifyη,Trans.trans]
simp only [comp_id, assoc, map_comp]
have := ε.hom.naturality (F.map (η.inv.app X)); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [← assoc _ _ (F.map _)]
have := ε.hom.naturality (ε.inv.app <| F.obj X); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
have := (ε.app <| F.obj X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [id_comp]; have := (F.mapIso <| η.app X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]
end
/-- Every equivalence of categories consisting of functors `F` and `G` such that `F ⋙ G` and
`G ⋙ F` are naturally isomorphic to identity functors can be transformed into a half-adjoint
equivalence without changing `F` or `G`. -/
protected def mk (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ C) (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D) : C ≌ D :=
⟨F, G, adjointifyη η ε, ε, adjointify_η_ε η ε⟩
/-- Equivalence of categories is reflexive. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl : C ≌ C :=
⟨𝟭 C, 𝟭 C, Iso.refl _, Iso.refl _, fun _ => Category.id_comp _⟩
instance : Inhabited (C ≌ C) :=
⟨refl⟩
/-- Equivalence of categories is symmetric. -/
@[symm, simps]
def symm (e : C ≌ D) : D ≌ C :=
⟨e.inverse, e.functor, e.counitIso.symm, e.unitIso.symm, e.inverse_counitInv_comp⟩
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
/-- Equivalence of categories is transitive. -/
@[trans, simps]
def trans (e : C ≌ D) (f : D ≌ E) : C ≌ E where
functor := e.functor ⋙ f.functor
inverse := f.inverse ⋙ e.inverse
unitIso := e.unitIso ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight (e.functor.rightUnitor.symm ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft _ f.unitIso ≪≫ (Functor.associator _ _ _ ).symm) _ ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _
counitIso := (Functor.associator _ _ _ ).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight ((Functor.associator _ _ _ ) ≪≫
isoWhiskerLeft _ e.counitIso ≪≫ f.inverse.rightUnitor) _ ≪≫ f.counitIso
-- We wouldn't have needed to give this proof if we'd used `Equivalence.mk`,
-- but we choose to avoid using that here, for the sake of good structure projection `simp`
-- lemmas.
functor_unitIso_comp X := by
dsimp
simp only [comp_id, id_comp, map_comp, fun_inv_map, comp_obj, id_obj, counitInv,
functor_unit_comp_assoc, assoc]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← Functor.map_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id_app]
simp
/-- Composing a functor with both functors of an equivalence yields a naturally isomorphic
functor. -/
def funInvIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.unitIso.symm F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
simp
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.unit.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
simp
/-- Composing a functor with both functors of an equivalence yields a naturally isomorphic
functor. -/
def invFunIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.counitIso F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
@[simp]
theorem invFunIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) (X : D) :
(invFunIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.counit.app X) := by
dsimp [invFunIdAssoc]
simp
@[simp]
theorem invFunIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : D ⥤ E) (X : D) :
(invFunIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.counitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [invFunIdAssoc]
simp
/-- If `C` is equivalent to `D`, then `C ⥤ E` is equivalent to `D ⥤ E`. -/
@[simps! functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def congrLeft (e : C ≌ D) : C ⥤ E ≌ D ⥤ E where
functor := (whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj e.inverse
inverse := (whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj e.functor
unitIso := (NatIso.ofComponents fun F => (e.funInvIdAssoc F).symm)
counitIso := (NatIso.ofComponents fun F => e.invFunIdAssoc F)
functor_unitIso_comp F := by
ext X
dsimp
simp only [funInvIdAssoc_inv_app, id_obj, comp_obj, invFunIdAssoc_hom_app,
Functor.comp_map, ← F.map_comp, unit_inverse_comp, map_id]
/-- If `C` is equivalent to `D`, then `E ⥤ C` is equivalent to `E ⥤ D`. -/
@[simps! functor inverse unitIso counitIso]
def congrRight (e : C ≌ D) : E ⥤ C ≌ E ⥤ D where
functor := (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj e.functor
inverse := (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj e.inverse
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents
fun F => F.rightUnitor.symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F e.unitIso ≪≫ Functor.associator _ _ _
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents
fun F => Functor.associator _ _ _ ≪≫ isoWhiskerLeft F e.counitIso ≪≫ F.rightUnitor
section CancellationLemmas
variable (e : C ≌ D)
/- We need special forms of `cancel_natIso_hom_right(_assoc)` and
`cancel_natIso_inv_right(_assoc)` for units and counits, because neither `simp` or `rw` will apply
those lemmas in this setting without providing `e.unitIso` (or similar) as an explicit argument.
We also provide the lemmas for length four compositions, since they're occasionally useful.
(e.g. in proving that equivalences take monos to monos) -/
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unit_right {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ e.unit.app Y = f' ≫ e.unit.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unitInv_right {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ e.inverse.obj (e.functor.obj Y)) :
f ≫ e.unitInv.app Y = f' ≫ e.unitInv.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_counit_right {X Y : D} (f f' : X ⟶ e.functor.obj (e.inverse.obj Y)) :
f ≫ e.counit.app Y = f' ≫ e.counit.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_counitInv_right {X Y : D} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y = f' ≫ e.counitInv.app Y ↔ f = f' := by simp only [cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unit_right_assoc {W X X' Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (f' : W ⟶ X') (g' : X' ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ g ≫ e.unit.app Y = f' ≫ g' ≫ e.unit.app Y ↔ f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_counitInv_right_assoc {W X X' Y : D} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (f' : W ⟶ X')
(g' : X' ⟶ Y) : f ≫ g ≫ e.counitInv.app Y = f' ≫ g' ≫ e.counitInv.app Y ↔ f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_unit_right_assoc' {W X X' Y Y' Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z)
(f' : W ⟶ X') (g' : X' ⟶ Y') (h' : Y' ⟶ Z) :
f ≫ g ≫ h ≫ e.unit.app Z = f' ≫ g' ≫ h' ≫ e.unit.app Z ↔ f ≫ g ≫ h = f' ≫ g' ≫ h' := by
simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono]
@[simp]
theorem cancel_counitInv_right_assoc' {W X X' Y Y' Z : D} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z)
(f' : W ⟶ X') (g' : X' ⟶ Y') (h' : Y' ⟶ Z) :
f ≫ g ≫ h ≫ e.counitInv.app Z = f' ≫ g' ≫ h' ≫ e.counitInv.app Z ↔
f ≫ g ≫ h = f' ≫ g' ≫ h' := by simp only [← Category.assoc, cancel_mono]
end CancellationLemmas
section
-- There's of course a monoid structure on `C ≌ C`,
-- but let's not encourage using it.
-- The power structure is nevertheless useful.
/-- Natural number powers of an auto-equivalence. Use `(^)` instead. -/
def powNat (e : C ≌ C) : ℕ → (C ≌ C)
| 0 => Equivalence.refl
| 1 => e
| | n + 2 => e.trans (powNat e (n + 1))
/-- Powers of an auto-equivalence. Use `(^)` instead. -/
def pow (e : C ≌ C) : ℤ → (C ≌ C)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Equivalence.lean | 424 | 427 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.PiNat
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.CompletelyMetrizable
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
/-!
# Polish spaces
A topological space is Polish if its topology is second-countable and there exists a compatible
complete metric. This is the class of spaces that is well-behaved with respect to measure theory.
In this file, we establish the basic properties of Polish spaces.
## Main definitions and results
* `PolishSpace α` is a mixin typeclass on a topological space, requiring that the topology is
second-countable and compatible with a complete metric. To endow the space with such a metric,
use in a proof `letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable α`.
* `IsClosed.polishSpace`: a closed subset of a Polish space is Polish.
* `IsOpen.polishSpace`: an open subset of a Polish space is Polish.
* `exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective`: any nonempty Polish space is the continuous image
of the fundamental Polish space `ℕ → ℕ`.
A fundamental property of Polish spaces is that one can put finer topologies, still Polish,
with additional properties:
* `exists_polishSpace_forall_le`: on a topological space, consider countably many topologies
`t n`, all Polish and finer than the original topology. Then there exists another Polish
topology which is finer than all the `t n`.
* `IsClopenable s` is a property of a subset `s` of a topological space, requiring that there
exists a finer topology, which is Polish, for which `s` becomes open and closed. We show that
this property is satisfied for open sets, closed sets, for complements, and for countable unions.
Once Borel-measurable sets are defined in later files, it will follow that any Borel-measurable
set is clopenable. Once the Lusin-Souslin theorem is proved using analytic sets, we will even
show that a set is clopenable if and only if it is Borel-measurable, see
`isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Function Metric TopologicalSpace Set Topology
open scoped Uniformity
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-! ### Basic properties of Polish spaces -/
/-- A Polish space is a topological space with second countable topology, that can be endowed
with a metric for which it is complete.
To endow a Polish space with a complete metric space structure, do
`letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable α`.
-/
class PolishSpace (α : Type*) [h : TopologicalSpace α] : Prop
extends SecondCountableTopology α, IsCompletelyMetrizableSpace α
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [SeparableSpace α] [IsCompletelyMetrizableSpace α] :
PolishSpace α := by
letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable α
haveI := UniformSpace.secondCountable_of_separable α
constructor
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-14")] alias UpgradedPolishSpace :=
UpgradedIsCompletelyMetrizableSpace
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-14")] alias polishSpaceMetric :=
completelyMetrizableMetric
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-14")] alias complete_polishSpaceMetric :=
complete_completelyMetrizableMetric
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-14")] alias upgradePolishSpace :=
upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable
namespace PolishSpace
/-- Any nonempty Polish space is the continuous image of the fundamental space `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
theorem exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[Nonempty α] : ∃ f : (ℕ → ℕ) → α, Continuous f ∧ Surjective f :=
letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable α
exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective_of_completeSpace α
/-- Given a closed embedding into a Polish space, the source space is also Polish. -/
theorem _root_.Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.polishSpace [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[PolishSpace β] {f : α → β} (hf : IsClosedEmbedding f) : PolishSpace α := by
letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable β
letI : MetricSpace α := hf.isEmbedding.comapMetricSpace f
haveI : SecondCountableTopology α := hf.isEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
have : CompleteSpace α := by
rw [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_range hf.isEmbedding.to_isometry.isUniformInducing]
exact hf.isClosed_range.isComplete
infer_instance
/-- Pulling back a Polish topology under an equiv gives again a Polish topology. -/
theorem _root_.Equiv.polishSpace_induced [t : TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β] (f : α ≃ β) :
@PolishSpace α (t.induced f) :=
letI : TopologicalSpace α := t.induced f
(f.toHomeomorphOfIsInducing ⟨rfl⟩).isClosedEmbedding.polishSpace
/-- A closed subset of a Polish space is also Polish. -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.polishSpace [TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α}
(hs : IsClosed s) : PolishSpace s :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.polishSpace
protected theorem _root_.CompletePseudometrizable.iInf {ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
{t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} (ht₀ : ∃ t₀, @T2Space α t₀ ∧ ∀ i, t i ≤ t₀)
(ht : ∀ i, ∃ u : UniformSpace α, CompleteSpace α ∧ 𝓤[u].IsCountablyGenerated ∧
u.toTopologicalSpace = t i) :
∃ u : UniformSpace α, CompleteSpace α ∧
𝓤[u].IsCountablyGenerated ∧ u.toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, t i := by
choose u hcomp hcount hut using ht
obtain rfl : t = fun i ↦ (u i).toTopologicalSpace := (funext hut).symm
refine ⟨⨅ i, u i, .iInf hcomp ht₀, ?_, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf⟩
rw [iInf_uniformity]
infer_instance
protected theorem iInf {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α}
(ht₀ : ∃ i₀, ∀ i, t i ≤ t i₀) (ht : ∀ i, @PolishSpace α (t i)) : @PolishSpace α (⨅ i, t i) := by
rcases ht₀ with ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩
rcases CompletePseudometrizable.iInf ⟨t i₀, letI := t i₀; haveI := ht i₀; inferInstance, hi₀⟩
fun i ↦
letI := t i; haveI := ht i; letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable α
⟨inferInstance, inferInstance, inferInstance, rfl⟩
with ⟨u, hcomp, hcount, htop⟩
rw [← htop]
have : @SecondCountableTopology α u.toTopologicalSpace :=
htop.symm ▸ secondCountableTopology_iInf fun i ↦ letI := t i; (ht i).toSecondCountableTopology
have : @T1Space α u.toTopologicalSpace :=
htop.symm ▸ t1Space_antitone (iInf_le _ i₀) (by letI := t i₀; haveI := ht i₀; infer_instance)
infer_instance
/-- Given a Polish space, and countably many finer Polish topologies, there exists another Polish
topology which is finer than all of them. -/
theorem exists_polishSpace_forall_le {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] [t : TopologicalSpace α]
[p : PolishSpace α] (m : ι → TopologicalSpace α) (hm : ∀ n, m n ≤ t)
(h'm : ∀ n, @PolishSpace α (m n)) :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, (∀ n, t' ≤ m n) ∧ t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' :=
⟨⨅ i : Option ι, i.elim t m, fun i ↦ iInf_le _ (some i), iInf_le _ none,
.iInf ⟨none, Option.forall.2 ⟨le_rfl, hm⟩⟩ <| Option.forall.2 ⟨p, h'm⟩⟩
instance : PolishSpace ENNReal :=
ENNReal.orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.isClosedEmbedding.polishSpace
end PolishSpace
/-!
### An open subset of a Polish space is Polish
To prove this fact, one needs to construct another metric, giving rise to the same topology,
for which the open subset is complete. This is not obvious, as for instance `(0,1) ⊆ ℝ` is not
complete for the usual metric of `ℝ`: one should build a new metric that blows up close to the
boundary.
-/
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
variable [MetricSpace α] {s : Opens α}
/-- A type synonym for a subset `s` of a metric space, on which we will construct another metric
for which it will be complete. -/
def CompleteCopy {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] (s : Opens α) : Type _ := s
namespace CompleteCopy
/-- A distance on an open subset `s` of a metric space, designed to make it complete. It is given
by `dist' x y = dist x y + |1 / dist x sᶜ - 1 / dist y sᶜ|`, where the second term blows up close to
the boundary to ensure that Cauchy sequences for `dist'` remain well inside `s`. -/
instance instDist : Dist (CompleteCopy s) where
dist x y := dist x.1 y.1 + abs (1 / infDist x.1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist y.1 sᶜ)
theorem dist_eq (x y : CompleteCopy s) :
dist x y = dist x.1 y.1 + abs (1 / infDist x.1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist y.1 sᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem dist_val_le_dist (x y : CompleteCopy s) : dist x.1 y.1 ≤ dist x y :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (abs_nonneg _)
instance : TopologicalSpace (CompleteCopy s) := inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace s)
instance [SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology (CompleteCopy s) :=
inferInstanceAs (SecondCountableTopology s)
instance : T0Space (CompleteCopy s) := inferInstanceAs (T0Space s)
/--
A metric space structure on a subset `s` of a metric space, designed to make it complete
if `s` is open. It is given by `dist' x y = dist x y + |1 / dist x sᶜ - 1 / dist y sᶜ|`, where the
second term blows up close to the boundary to ensure that Cauchy sequences for `dist'` remain well
inside `s`.
This definition ensures the `TopologicalSpace` structure on
`TopologicalSpace.Opens.CompleteCopy s` is definitionally equal to the original one.
-/
instance instMetricSpace : MetricSpace (CompleteCopy s) := by
refine @MetricSpace.ofT0PseudoMetricSpace (CompleteCopy s)
(.ofDistTopology dist (fun _ ↦ ?_) (fun _ _ ↦ ?_) (fun x y z ↦ ?_) fun t ↦ ?_) _
· simp only [dist_eq, dist_self, one_div, sub_self, abs_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [dist_eq, dist_comm, abs_sub_comm]
· calc
dist x z = dist x.1 z.1 + |1 / infDist x.1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist z.1 sᶜ| := rfl
_ ≤ dist x.1 y.1 + dist y.1 z.1 + (|1 / infDist x.1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist y.1 sᶜ| +
|1 / infDist y.1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist z.1 sᶜ|) :=
add_le_add (dist_triangle _ _ _) (dist_triangle (1 / infDist _ _) _ _)
_ = dist x y + dist y z := add_add_add_comm ..
· refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases (Metric.isOpen_iff (α := s)).1 h x hx with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
exact ⟨ε, ε0, fun y hy ↦ hε <| (dist_comm _ _).trans_lt <| (dist_val_le_dist _ _).trans_lt hy⟩
· rcases h x hx with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
simp only [dist_eq, one_div] at hε
have : Tendsto (fun y : s ↦ dist x.1 y.1 + |(infDist x.1 sᶜ)⁻¹ - (infDist y.1 sᶜ)⁻¹|)
(𝓝 x) (𝓝 (dist x.1 x.1 + |(infDist x.1 sᶜ)⁻¹ - (infDist x.1 sᶜ)⁻¹|)) := by
refine (tendsto_const_nhds.dist continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt).add
(tendsto_const_nhds.sub <| ?_).abs
refine (continuousAt_inv_infDist_pt ?_).comp continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
rw [s.isOpen.isClosed_compl.closure_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_not]
exact x.2
simp only [dist_self, sub_self, abs_zero, zero_add] at this
exact mem_of_superset (this <| gt_mem_nhds ε0) hε
instance instCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace α] : CompleteSpace (CompleteCopy s) := by
refine Metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences ((1 / 2) ^ ·) (by simp) fun u hu ↦ ?_
have A : CauchySeq fun n => (u n).1 := by
refine cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0 (fun n : ℕ => (1 / 2) ^ n) (fun n m N hNn hNm => ?_) ?_
· exact (dist_val_le_dist (u n) (u m)).trans (hu N n m hNn hNm).le
· exact tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
obtain ⟨x, xlim⟩ : ∃ x, Tendsto (fun n => (u n).1) atTop (𝓝 x) := cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete A
by_cases xs : x ∈ s
· exact ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, tendsto_subtype_rng.2 xlim⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ n, 1 / infDist (u n).1 sᶜ < C := by
refine ⟨(1 / 2) ^ 0 + 1 / infDist (u 0).1 sᶜ, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_lt_iff_lt_add]
calc
_ ≤ |1 / infDist (u n).1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist (u 0).1 sᶜ| := le_abs_self _
_ = |1 / infDist (u 0).1 sᶜ - 1 / infDist (u n).1 sᶜ| := abs_sub_comm _ _
_ ≤ dist (u 0) (u n) := le_add_of_nonneg_left dist_nonneg
_ < (1 / 2) ^ 0 := hu 0 0 n le_rfl n.zero_le
have Cpos : 0 < C := lt_of_le_of_lt (div_nonneg zero_le_one infDist_nonneg) (hC 0)
have Hmem : ∀ {y}, y ∈ s ↔ 0 < infDist y sᶜ := fun {y} ↦ by
rw [← s.isOpen.isClosed_compl.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos ⟨x, xs⟩]; exact not_not.symm
have I : ∀ n, 1 / C ≤ infDist (u n).1 sᶜ := fun n ↦ by
have : 0 < infDist (u n).1 sᶜ := Hmem.1 (u n).2
rw [div_le_iff₀' Cpos]
exact (div_le_iff₀ this).1 (hC n).le
have I' : 1 / C ≤ infDist x sᶜ :=
have : Tendsto (fun n => infDist (u n).1 sᶜ) atTop (𝓝 (infDist x sᶜ)) :=
((continuous_infDist_pt (sᶜ : Set α)).tendsto x).comp xlim
ge_of_tendsto' this I
exact absurd (Hmem.2 <| lt_of_lt_of_le (div_pos one_pos Cpos) I') xs
/-- An open subset of a Polish space is also Polish. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.polishSpace {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α}
(hs : IsOpen s) : PolishSpace s := by
letI := upgradeIsCompletelyMetrizable α
lift s to Opens α using hs
exact inferInstanceAs (PolishSpace s.CompleteCopy)
end CompleteCopy
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
namespace PolishSpace
/-! ### Clopenable sets in Polish spaces -/
/-- A set in a topological space is clopenable if there exists a finer Polish topology for which
this set is open and closed. It turns out that this notion is equivalent to being Borel-measurable,
but this is nontrivial (see `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`). -/
def IsClopenable [t : TopologicalSpace α] (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' ∧ IsClosed[t'] s ∧ IsOpen[t'] s
/-- Given a closed set `s` in a Polish space, one can construct a finer Polish topology for
which `s` is both open and closed. -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.isClopenable [TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α}
(hs : IsClosed s) : IsClopenable s := by
/- Both sets `s` and `sᶜ` admit a Polish topology. So does their disjoint union `s ⊕ sᶜ`.
Pulling back this topology by the canonical bijection with `α` gives the desired Polish
topology in which `s` is both open and closed. -/
classical
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
let t : Set α := sᶜ
haveI : PolishSpace t := hs.isOpen_compl.polishSpace
let f : s ⊕ t ≃ α := Equiv.Set.sumCompl s
have hle : TopologicalSpace.coinduced f instTopologicalSpaceSum ≤ ‹_› := by
simp only [instTopologicalSpaceSum, coinduced_sup, coinduced_compose, sup_le_iff,
← continuous_iff_coinduced_le]
exact ⟨continuous_subtype_val, continuous_subtype_val⟩
refine ⟨.coinduced f instTopologicalSpaceSum, hle, ?_, hs.mono hle, ?_⟩
· rw [← f.induced_symm]
exact f.symm.polishSpace_induced
· rw [isOpen_coinduced, isOpen_sum_iff]
simp only [preimage_preimage, f]
have inl (x : s) : (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s) (Sum.inl x) = x := Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inl ..
have inr (x : ↑sᶜ) : (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s) (Sum.inr x) = x := Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inr ..
simp_rw [t, inl, inr, Subtype.coe_preimage_self]
simp only [isOpen_univ, true_and]
rw [Subtype.preimage_coe_compl']
simp
theorem IsClopenable.compl [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsClopenable s) :
IsClopenable sᶜ := by
rcases hs with ⟨t, t_le, t_polish, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨t, t_le, t_polish, @IsOpen.isClosed_compl α t s h', @IsClosed.isOpen_compl α t s h⟩
theorem _root_.IsOpen.isClopenable [TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α}
(hs : IsOpen s) : IsClopenable s := by
simpa using hs.isClosed_compl.isClopenable.compl
-- TODO: generalize for free to `[Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}`
theorem IsClopenable.iUnion [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α] {s : ℕ → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, IsClopenable (s n)) : IsClopenable (⋃ n, s n) := by
choose m mt m_polish _ m_open using hs
obtain ⟨t', t'm, -, t'_polish⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, (∀ n : ℕ, t' ≤ m n) ∧ t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' :=
exists_polishSpace_forall_le m mt m_polish
have A : IsOpen[t'] (⋃ n, s n) := by
apply isOpen_iUnion
intro n
apply t'm n
exact m_open n
obtain ⟨t'', t''_le, t''_polish, h1, h2⟩ : ∃ t'' : TopologicalSpace α,
t'' ≤ t' ∧ @PolishSpace α t'' ∧ IsClosed[t''] (⋃ n, s n) ∧ IsOpen[t''] (⋃ n, s n) :=
@IsOpen.isClopenable α t' t'_polish _ A
exact ⟨t'', t''_le.trans ((t'm 0).trans (mt 0)), t''_polish, h1, h2⟩
end PolishSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Polish.lean | 402 | 404 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
/-!
# Preserving (co)kernels
Constructions to relate the notions of preserving (co)kernels and reflecting (co)kernels
to concrete (co)forks.
In particular, we show that `kernel_comparison f g G` is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves
the limit of the parallel pair `f,0`, as well as the dual result.
-/
noncomputable section
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace KernelFork
variable {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (c : KernelFork f)
(G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_condition : G.map c.ι ≫ G.map f = 0 := by
| rw [← G.map_comp, c.condition, G.map_zero]
/-- A kernel fork for `f` is mapped to a kernel fork for `G.map f` if `G` is a functor
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Kernels.lean | 38 | 40 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Nat
/-!
# Properties of `Nat.gcd`, `Nat.lcm`, and `Nat.Coprime`
Definitions are provided in batteries.
Generalizations of these are provided in a later file as `GCDMonoid.gcd` and
`GCDMonoid.lcm`.
Note that the global `IsCoprime` is not a straightforward generalization of `Nat.Coprime`, see
`Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime` for the connection between the two.
Most of this file could be moved to batteries as well.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
namespace Nat
variable {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : ℕ}
/-! ### `gcd` -/
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
/-! Lemmas where one argument consists of addition of a multiple of the other -/
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) : (a ^ c - 1) % (a ^ b - 1) = a ^ (c % b) - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos a with rfl | ha0
· simp [zero_pow_eq]; split_ifs <;> simp
rcases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ha0 with rfl | ha1
· simp
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb0
· simp
rcases lt_or_le c b with h | h
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt, mod_eq_of_lt h]
rwa [Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right (one_le_pow c a ha0), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right ha1]
· suffices a ^ (c - b + b) - 1 = a ^ (c - b) * (a ^ b - 1) + (a ^ (c - b) - 1) by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, add_mod_right, this, add_mod, mul_mod, mod_self,
mul_zero, zero_mod, zero_add, mod_mod, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one]
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (one_le_pow (c - b) a ha0), ← mul_add_one, pow_add,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (one_le_pow b a ha0)]
@[simp]
theorem pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one (a b c : ℕ) :
gcd (a ^ b - 1) (a ^ c - 1) = a ^ gcd b c - 1 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_pos b with rfl | hb
· simp
replace hb : c % b < b := mod_lt c hb
rw [gcd_rec, pow_sub_one_mod_pow_sub_one, pow_sub_one_gcd_pow_sub_one, ← gcd_rec]
/-! ### `lcm` -/
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h, dvd_div_iff_mul_dvd h,
← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
/-!
### `Coprime`
See also `Nat.coprime_of_dvd` and `Nat.coprime_of_dvd'` to prove `Nat.Coprime m n`.
-/
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (n + m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [add_comm, coprime_add_self_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_self_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_add_left {m n : ℕ} : Coprime (m + n) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + k * m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (n + m * k) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (k * m + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime m (m * k + n) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + k * n) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_right_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (m + n * k) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_mul_left_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (k * n + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_right_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : Coprime (n * k + m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_mul_left_add_left]
lemma add_coprime_iff_left (h : c ∣ b) : Coprime (a + b) c ↔ Coprime a c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma add_coprime_iff_right (h : c ∣ a) : Coprime (a + b) c ↔ Coprime b c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma coprime_add_iff_left (h : a ∣ c) : Coprime a (b + c) ↔ Coprime a b := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
lemma coprime_add_iff_right (h : a ∣ b) : Coprime a (b + c) ↔ Coprime a c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h; simp
-- TODO: Replace `Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_left`
lemma Coprime.of_dvd_left (ha : a₁ ∣ a₂) (h : Coprime a₂ b) : Coprime a₁ b := h.coprime_dvd_left ha
-- TODO: Replace `Nat.Coprime.coprime_dvd_right`
lemma Coprime.of_dvd_right (hb : b₁ ∣ b₂) (h : Coprime a b₂) : Coprime a b₁ :=
h.coprime_dvd_right hb
lemma Coprime.of_dvd (ha : a₁ ∣ a₂) (hb : b₁ ∣ b₂) (h : Coprime a₂ b₂) : Coprime a₁ b₁ :=
(h.of_dvd_left ha).of_dvd_right hb
@[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) m ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_sub_self_left h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_sub_self_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime m (n - m) ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_sub_self_right h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_sub_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime (n - m) n ↔ Coprime m n := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_sub_left h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_self_sub_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Coprime n (n - m) ↔ Coprime n m := by
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_self_sub_right h]
@[simp]
theorem coprime_pow_left_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
Nat.Coprime (a ^ n) b ↔ Nat.Coprime a b := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Nat.ne_of_gt hn)
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.coprime_mul_iff_left]
exact ⟨And.right, fun hab => ⟨hab.pow_left _, hab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coprime_pow_right_iff {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a b : ℕ) :
Nat.Coprime a (b ^ n) ↔ Nat.Coprime a b := by
rw [Nat.coprime_comm, coprime_pow_left_iff hn, Nat.coprime_comm]
theorem not_coprime_zero_zero : ¬Coprime 0 0 := by simp
theorem coprime_one_left_iff (n : ℕ) : Coprime 1 n ↔ True := by simp [Coprime]
theorem coprime_one_right_iff (n : ℕ) : Coprime n 1 ↔ True := by simp [Coprime]
theorem gcd_mul_of_coprime_of_dvd {a b c : ℕ} (hac : Coprime a c) (b_dvd_c : b ∣ c) :
gcd (a * b) c = b := by
rcases exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd b_dvd_c with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [gcd_mul_right]
convert one_mul b
exact Coprime.coprime_mul_right_right hac
theorem Coprime.eq_of_mul_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) (hmn : m * n = 0) :
m = 0 ∧ n = 1 ∨ m = 1 ∧ n = 0 :=
(Nat.mul_eq_zero.mp hmn).imp (fun hm => ⟨hm, n.coprime_zero_left.mp <| hm ▸ h⟩) fun hn =>
let eq := hn ▸ h.symm
⟨m.coprime_zero_left.mp <| eq, hn⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias prodDvdAndDvdOfDvdProd := dvdProdDvdOfDvdProd
theorem coprime_iff_isRelPrime {m n : ℕ} : m.Coprime n ↔ IsRelPrime m n := by
simp_rw [coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, IsRelPrime, ← and_imp, ← dvd_gcd_iff, isUnit_iff_dvd_one]
exact ⟨fun h _ ↦ (h ▸ ·), (dvd_one.mp <| · dvd_rfl)⟩
/-- If `k:ℕ` divides coprime `a` and `b` then `k = 1` -/
theorem eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes {a b k : ℕ} (h_ab_coprime : Coprime a b) (hka : k ∣ a)
(hkb : k ∣ b) : k = 1 :=
dvd_one.mp (isUnit_iff_dvd_one.mp <| coprime_iff_isRelPrime.mp h_ab_coprime hka hkb)
theorem Coprime.mul_add_mul_ne_mul {m n a b : ℕ} (cop : Coprime m n) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * m + b * n ≠ m * n := by
intro h
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ : n ∣ a :=
cop.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
((Nat.dvd_add_iff_left (Nat.dvd_mul_left n b)).mpr
((congr_arg _ h).mpr (Nat.dvd_mul_left n m)))
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ : m ∣ b :=
cop.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right
((Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (Nat.dvd_mul_left m (n * x))).mpr
((congr_arg _ h).mpr (Nat.dvd_mul_right m n)))
rw [mul_comm, mul_ne_zero_iff, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
refine mul_ne_zero hb.2 ha.2 (eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (ne_of_gt (add_le_add ha.1 hb.1)) ?_)
rw [← mul_assoc, ← h, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, mul_comm _ n, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm y]
variable {x n m : ℕ}
theorem gcd_mul_gcd_eq_iff_dvd_mul_of_coprime (hcop : Coprime n m) :
gcd x n * gcd x m = x ↔ x ∣ n * m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, (dvd_antisymm ?_ <| dvd_gcd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul.mpr ·)⟩
refine h ▸ Nat.mul_dvd_mul ?_ ?_ <;> exact x.gcd_dvd_right _
refine (hcop.gcd_both x x).mul_dvd_of_dvd_of_dvd ?_ ?_ <;> exact x.gcd_dvd_left _
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 262 | 262 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
/-!
# Ring-theoretic supplement of Algebra.Polynomial.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.isDomain`:
If a ring is an integral domain, then so is its polynomial ring over finitely many variables.
* `Polynomial.isNoetherianRing`:
Hilbert basis theorem, that if a ring is noetherian then so is its polynomial ring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree < `n`. -/
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
/-- The first `n` coefficients on `degreeLT n` form a linear equivalence with `Fin n → R`. -/
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
/-- The equivalence between monic polynomials of degree `n` and polynomials of degree less than
`n`, formed by adding a term `X ^ n`. -/
def monicEquivDegreeLT [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
{ p : R[X] // p.Monic ∧ p.natDegree = n } ≃ degreeLT R n where
toFun p := ⟨p.1.eraseLead, by
rcases p with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_degreeLT]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ degree_le_natDegree
exact degree_eraseLead_lt (ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic one_ne_zero hp)⟩
invFun := fun p =>
⟨X^n + p.1, monic_X_pow_add (mem_degreeLT.1 p.2), by
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 p.2]⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
ext1
simp only
conv_rhs => rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow p]
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, add_comm]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only
rw [eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 hp]
/-- For every polynomial `p` in the span of a set `s : Set R[X]`, there exists a polynomial of
`p' ∈ s` with higher degree. See also `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
/-- A stronger version of `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span` under the assumption that the
set `s : R[X]` is finite. There exists a polynomial `p' ∈ s` whose degree dominates the degree of
every element of `p ∈ span R s`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLE n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLT n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
/-- If `R` is a nontrivial ring, the polynomials `R[X]` are not finite as an `R`-module. When `R` is
a field, this is equivalent to `R[X]` being an infinite-dimensional vector space over `R`. -/
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
theorem geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).comp (X + 1) =
(Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ => (n.choose (i + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ i := by
ext i
trans (n.choose (i + 1) : R); swap
· simp only [finset_sum_coeff, ← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, if_pos rfl]
· simp +contextual only [@eq_comm _ i, if_false, eq_self_iff_true,
imp_true_iff]
· simp +contextual only [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt,
Nat.cast_zero, Finset.mem_range, not_lt, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, imp_true_iff]
induction' n with n ih generalizing i
· dsimp; simp only [zero_comp, coeff_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', ih, add_comp, X_pow_comp, coeff_add, Nat.choose_succ_succ,
Nat.cast_add, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
theorem Monic.geom_sum {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.natDegree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn
rw [geom_sum_succ']
refine (hP.pow _).add_of_left ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· simp only [Finset.mem_range, degree_eq_natDegree (hP.pow _).ne_zero]
simp only [Nat.cast_lt, hP.natDegree_pow]
intro k
exact nsmul_lt_nsmul_left hdeg
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot]
exact (hP.pow _).ne_zero
theorem Monic.geom_sum' {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic :=
hP.geom_sum (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg) hn
theorem monic_geom_sum_X {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
apply monic_X.geom_sum _ hn
simp only [natDegree_X, zero_lt_one]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Given a polynomial, return the polynomial whose coefficients are in
the ring closure of the original coefficients. -/
def restriction (p : R[X]) : Polynomial (Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R)) :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ (Subring.closure _).zero_mem
else Subring.subset_closure (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ :
Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R))
@[simp]
theorem coeff_restriction {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (restriction p) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [restriction, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_restriction' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (coeff (restriction p) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_restriction (p : R[X]) : support (restriction p) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_restriction]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_restriction {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
p.restriction.map (algebraMap _ _) = p :=
ext fun n => by rw [coeff_map, Algebra.algebraMap_ofSubring_apply, coeff_restriction]
@[simp]
theorem degree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_restriction {p : R[X]} : Monic (restriction p) ↔ Monic p := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_restriction]
rw [← @coeff_restriction _ _ p]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem restriction_zero : restriction (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [restriction, Finset.sum_empty, support_zero]
@[simp]
theorem restriction_one : restriction (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by rw [coeff_restriction', coeff_one, coeff_one]; split_ifs <;> rfl
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} {x : S}
theorem eval₂_restriction {p : R[X]} :
eval₂ f x p =
eval₂ (f.comp (Subring.subtype (Subring.closure (p.coeffs : Set R)))) x p.restriction := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, support_restriction, ← @coeff_restriction _ _ p, RingHom.comp_apply,
Subring.coe_subtype]
section ToSubring
variable (p : R[X]) (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial `p` and a subring `T` that contains the coefficients of `p`,
return the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in `T`. -/
def toSubring (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T) : T[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ T.zero_mem else hp (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ : T)
variable (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_toSubring {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (toSubring p T hp) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [toSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_toSubring' {n : ℕ} : (coeff (toSubring p T hp) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_toSubring : support (toSubring p T hp) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem degree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).natDegree = p.natDegree := by simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_toSubring : Monic (toSubring p T hp) ↔ Monic p := by
simp_rw [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_toSubring, ← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_zero : toSubring (0 : R[X]) T (by simp [coeffs]) = 0 := by
ext i
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_one :
toSubring (1 : R[X]) T
(Set.Subset.trans coeffs_one <| Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff.2 T.one_mem) =
1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by
rw [coeff_toSubring', coeff_one, coeff_one, apply_ite Subtype.val, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero,
OneMemClass.coe_one]
@[simp]
theorem map_toSubring : (p.toSubring T hp).map (Subring.subtype T) = p := by
ext n
simp [coeff_map]
end ToSubring
variable (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial whose coefficients are in some subring, return
the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in the ambient ring. -/
def ofSubring (p : T[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i : R)
theorem coeff_ofSubring (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (ofSubring T p) n = (coeff p n : T) := by
simp only [ofSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
ite_eq_right_iff, Ne, ite_not, Classical.not_not, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro h
rw [h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_ofSubring {p : T[X]} : (↑(p.ofSubring T).coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T := by
classical
intro i hi
simp only [coeffs, Set.mem_image, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_coe,
(Finset.coe_image)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨n, _, h'n⟩
rw [← h'n, coeff_ofSubring]
exact Subtype.mem (coeff p n : T)
end Ring
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- Transport an ideal of `R[X]` to an `R`-submodule of `R[X]`. -/
def ofPolynomial (I : Ideal R[X]) : Submodule R R[X] where
carrier := I.carrier
zero_mem' := I.zero_mem
add_mem' := I.add_mem
smul_mem' c x H := by
rw [← C_mul']
exact I.mul_mem_left _ H
variable {I : Ideal R[X]}
theorem mem_ofPolynomial (x) : x ∈ I.ofPolynomial ↔ x ∈ I :=
Iff.rfl
variable (I)
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the `R`-submodule of `I`
consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
Polynomial.degreeLE R n ⊓ I.ofPolynomial
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of
leading coefficients of polynomials in `I` with degree ≤ `n`. -/
def leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) : Ideal R :=
(I.degreeLE n).map <| lcoeff R n
/-- Given an ideal `I` in `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of the
leading coefficients in `I`. -/
def leadingCoeff : Ideal R :=
⨆ n : ℕ, I.leadingCoeffNth n
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S]
/-- If every coefficient of a polynomial is in an ideal `I`, then so is the polynomial itself -/
theorem polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal (I : Ideal R[X]) (p : R[X])
(hp : ∀ n : ℕ, p.coeff n ∈ I.comap (C : R →+* R[X])) : p ∈ I :=
sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p ▸ Submodule.sum_mem I fun n _ => I.mul_mem_right _ (hp n)
/-- The push-forward of an ideal `I` of `R` to `R[X]` via inclusion
is exactly the set of polynomials whose coefficients are in `I` -/
theorem mem_map_C_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R[X]} :
f ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, f.coeff n ∈ I := by
constructor
· intro hf
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hf
· intro f hf n
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hf
rw [← hx.right, coeff_C]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simpa [h] using hx.left
· simp [h]
· simp
· exact fun f g _ _ hf hg n => by simp [I.add_mem (hf n) (hg n)]
· refine fun f g _ hg n => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul]
exact I.sum_mem fun c _ => I.mul_mem_left (f.coeff c.fst) (hg c.snd)
· intro hf
rw [← sum_monomial_eq f]
refine (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).sum_mem fun n _ => ?_
simp only [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ne_eq]
rw [mul_comm]
exact (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).mul_mem_left _ (mem_map_of_mem _ (hf n))
theorem _root_.Polynomial.ker_mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) :
RingHom.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom f) = (RingHom.ker f).map (C : R →+* R[X]) := by
ext
simp only [RingHom.mem_ker, coe_mapRingHom]
rw [mem_map_C_iff, Polynomial.ext_iff]
simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
variable (I : Ideal R[X])
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) (x) :
x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth n ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, degree p ≤ n ∧ p.leadingCoeff = x := by
simp only [leadingCoeffNth, degreeLE, Submodule.mem_map, lcoeff_apply, Submodule.mem_inf,
mem_degreeLE]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, ⟨hpdeg, hpI⟩, rfl⟩
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hpdeg with hpdeg | hpdeg
· refine ⟨0, I.zero_mem, bot_le, ?_⟩
rw [leadingCoeff_zero, eq_comm]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hpdeg
· refine ⟨p, hpI, le_of_eq hpdeg, ?_⟩
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, hpdeg, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
· rintro ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
have : natDegree p + (n - natDegree p) = n :=
add_tsub_cancel_of_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg)
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - natDegree p), ⟨?_, I.mul_mem_right _ hpI⟩, ?_⟩
· apply le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) _
apply le_trans (add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_X_pow_le _)) _
rw [← Nat.cast_add, this]
· rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow p (n - natDegree p), this]
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth_zero (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth 0 ↔ C x ∈ I :=
(mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _ _).trans
⟨fun ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, hpx⟩ => by
rwa [← hpx, Polynomial.leadingCoeff,
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg), ← eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hpdeg],
fun hx => ⟨C x, hx, degree_C_le, leadingCoeff_C x⟩⟩
theorem leadingCoeffNth_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : I.leadingCoeffNth m ≤ I.leadingCoeffNth n := by
intro r hr
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_leadingCoeffNth] at hr ⊢
rcases hr with ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - m), I.mul_mem_right _ hpI, ?_, leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow⟩
refine le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) ?_
refine le_trans (add_le_add hpdeg (degree_X_pow_le _)) ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le H]
theorem mem_leadingCoeff (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeff ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, Polynomial.leadingCoeff p = x := by
rw [leadingCoeff, Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed]
· simp only [mem_leadingCoeffNth]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, p, hpI, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p, p, hpI, degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩
intro i j
exact
⟨i + j, I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_right _ _),
I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩
/-- If `I` is an ideal, and `pᵢ` is a finite family of polynomials each satisfying
`∀ k, (pᵢ)ₖ ∈ Iⁿⁱ⁻ᵏ` for some `nᵢ`, then `p = ∏ pᵢ` also satisfies `∀ k, pₖ ∈ Iⁿ⁻ᵏ` with `n = ∑ nᵢ`.
-/
theorem _root_.Polynomial.coeff_prod_mem_ideal_pow_tsub {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X])
(I : Ideal R) (n : ι → ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ (k), (f i).coeff k ∈ I ^ (n i - k)) (k : ℕ) :
(s.prod f).coeff k ∈ I ^ (s.sum n - k) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s ha hs generalizing k
· rw [sum_empty, prod_empty, coeff_one, zero_tsub, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· rw [sum_insert ha, prod_insert ha, coeff_mul]
apply sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ e
obtain rfl : i + j = k := mem_antidiagonal.mp e
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub
rw [pow_add]
exact
Ideal.mul_mem_mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inl rfl) _)
(hs (fun i hi k => h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inr hi) _) j)
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- `R[X]` is never a field for any ring `R`. -/
theorem polynomial_not_isField : ¬IsField R[X] := by
nontriviality R
intro hR
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel X_ne_zero
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one hp
have := degree_lt_degree_mul_X hp0
rw [← X_mul, congr_arg degree hp, degree_one, Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff, degree_eq_bot] at this
exact hp0 this
/-- The only constant in a maximal ideal over a field is `0`. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_constant_mem_of_maximal (hR : IsField R) (I : Ideal R[X]) [hI : I.IsMaximal]
(x : R) (hx : C x ∈ I) : x = 0 := by
refine Classical.by_contradiction fun hx0 => hI.ne_top ((eq_top_iff_one I).2 ?_)
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel hx0
convert I.mul_mem_left (C y) hx
rw [← C.map_mul, hR.mul_comm y x, hy, RingHom.map_one]
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime (P : Ideal R) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) ↔ IsPrime P := by
-- Note: the following proof avoids quotient rings
-- It can be golfed substantially by using something like
-- `(Quotient.isDomain_iff_prime (map C P : Ideal R[X]))`
constructor
· intro H
have := comap_isPrime C (map C P)
convert this using 1
ext x
simp only [mem_comap, mem_map_C_iff]
constructor
· rintro h (- | n)
· rwa [coeff_C_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro h
simpa only [coeff_C_zero] using h 0
· intro h
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_top_iff_one, mem_map_C_iff, not_forall]
use 0
rw [coeff_one_zero, ← eq_top_iff_one]
exact h.1
· intro f g
simp only [mem_map_C_iff]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
classical
let m := Nat.find hf
let n := Nat.find hg
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.insert_erase ((Finset.mem_antidiagonal (a := (m,n))).mpr rfl),
Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _), (P.add_mem_iff_left _).not]
· apply mt h.2
rw [not_or]
exact ⟨Nat.find_spec hf, Nat.find_spec hg⟩
apply P.sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at hij
simp only [Ne, Prod.mk_inj, not_and_or] at hij
obtain hi | hj : i < m ∨ j < n := by
omega
· rw [mul_comm]
apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hf hi)
· apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hg hj)
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime {P : Ideal R} (H : IsPrime P) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) :=
(isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime P).mpr H
theorem is_fg_degreeLE [IsNoetherianRing R] (I : Ideal R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
Submodule.FG (I.degreeLE n) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
isNoetherian_submodule_left.1
(isNoetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ ⟨_, degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow.symm⟩) _
end CommRing
end Ideal
section Ideal
open Submodule Set
variable [Semiring R] {f : R[X]} {I : Ideal R[X]}
/-- If the coefficients of a polynomial belong to an ideal, then that ideal contains
the ideal spanned by the coefficients of the polynomial. -/
theorem span_le_of_C_coeff_mem (cf : ∀ i : ℕ, C (f.coeff i) ∈ I) :
Ideal.span { g | ∃ i, g = C (f.coeff i) } ≤ I := by
simp only [@eq_comm _ _ (C _)]
exact (Ideal.span_le.trans range_subset_iff).mpr cf
theorem mem_span_C_coeff : f ∈ Ideal.span { g : R[X] | ∃ i : ℕ, g = C (coeff f i) } := by
let p := Ideal.span { g : R[X] | ∃ i : ℕ, g = C (coeff f i) }
nth_rw 2 [(sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq f).symm]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun n _hn => ?_
dsimp
have : C (coeff f n) ∈ p := by
apply subset_span
rw [mem_setOf_eq]
use n
have : monomial n (1 : R) • C (coeff f n) ∈ p := p.smul_mem _ this
convert this using 1
simp only [monomial_mul_C, one_mul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
theorem exists_C_coeff_not_mem : f ∉ I → ∃ i : ℕ, C (coeff f i) ∉ I :=
Not.imp_symm fun cf => span_le_of_C_coeff_mem (not_exists_not.mp cf) mem_span_C_coeff
end Ideal
variable {σ : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
section Prime
variable (σ) {r : R}
namespace Polynomial
theorem prime_C_iff : Prime (C r) ↔ Prime r :=
⟨comap_prime C (evalRingHom (0 : R)) fun _ => eval_C, fun hr => by
have := hr.1
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_prime] at hr ⊢
· rw [← Set.image_singleton, ← Ideal.map_span]
apply Ideal.isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime hr
· intro h; apply (this (C_eq_zero.mp h))
· assumption⟩
end Polynomial
namespace MvPolynomial
private theorem prime_C_iff_of_fintype {R : Type u} (σ : Type v) {r : R} [CommRing R] [Fintype σ] :
Prime (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ Prime r := by
rw [← MulEquiv.prime_iff (renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin σ))]
convert_to Prime (C r) ↔ _
· congr!
simp only [renameEquiv_apply, algHom_C, algebraMap_eq]
· induction' Fintype.card σ with d hd
· exact MulEquiv.prime_iff (isEmptyAlgEquiv R (Fin 0)).symm (p := r)
· convert MulEquiv.prime_iff (finSuccEquiv R d).symm (p := Polynomial.C (C r))
· simp [← finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C]
· simp [← hd, Polynomial.prime_C_iff]
theorem prime_C_iff : Prime (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ Prime r :=
⟨comap_prime C constantCoeff (constantCoeff_C _), fun hr =>
⟨fun h => hr.1 <| by
rw [← C_inj, h]
simp,
fun h =>
hr.2.1 <| by
rw [← constantCoeff_C _ r]
exact h.map _,
fun a b hd => by
obtain ⟨s, a', b', rfl, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename₂ a b
rw [← algebraMap_eq] at hd
have : algebraMap R _ r ∣ a' * b' := by
convert killCompl Subtype.coe_injective |>.toRingHom.map_dvd hd <;> simp
rw [← rename_C ((↑) : s → σ)]
let f := (rename (R := R) ((↑) : s → σ)).toRingHom
exact (((prime_C_iff_of_fintype s).2 hr).2.2 a' b' this).imp f.map_dvd f.map_dvd⟩⟩
variable {σ}
theorem prime_rename_iff (s : Set σ) {p : MvPolynomial s R} :
Prime (rename ((↑) : s → σ) p) ↔ Prime (p : MvPolynomial s R) := by
classical
symm
let eqv :=
(sumAlgEquiv R (↥sᶜ) s).symm.trans
(renameEquiv R <| (Equiv.sumComm (↥sᶜ) s).trans <| Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
have : (rename (↑)).toRingHom = eqv.toAlgHom.toRingHom.comp C := by
apply ringHom_ext
· intro
simp only [eqv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, rename_C,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply,
iterToSum_C_C, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply]
· intro
simp only [eqv, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, rename_X,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp,
AlgEquiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv_symm_apply,
iterToSum_C_X, renameEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.sumComm_apply, Sum.swap_inr,
Equiv.Set.sumCompl_apply_inl]
apply_fun (· p) at this
simp only [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe,
AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_toRingHom, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply] at this
rw [this, MulEquiv.prime_iff, prime_C_iff]
end MvPolynomial
end Prime
/-- **Hilbert basis theorem**: a polynomial ring over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring. -/
protected theorem Polynomial.isNoetherianRing [inst : IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing R[X] :=
isNoetherianRing_iff.2
⟨fun I : Ideal R[X] =>
let M := inst.wf.min (Set.range I.leadingCoeffNth) ⟨_, ⟨0, rfl⟩⟩
have hm : M ∈ Set.range I.leadingCoeffNth := WellFounded.min_mem _ _ _
let ⟨N, HN⟩ := hm
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := I.is_fg_degreeLE N
have hm2 : ∀ k, I.leadingCoeffNth k ≤ M := fun k =>
Or.casesOn (le_or_lt k N) (fun h => HN ▸ I.leadingCoeffNth_mono h) fun h _ hx =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hxm =>
haveI : IsNoetherian R R := inst
have : ¬M < I.leadingCoeffNth k := by
refine WellFounded.not_lt_min inst.wf _ _ ?_; exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
this ⟨HN ▸ I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (le_of_lt h), fun H => hxm (H hx)⟩
have hs2 : ∀ {x}, x ∈ I.degreeLE N → x ∈ Ideal.span (↑s : Set R[X]) :=
hs ▸ fun hx =>
Submodule.span_induction (hx := hx) (fun _ hx => Ideal.subset_span hx) (Ideal.zero_mem _)
(fun _ _ _ _ => Ideal.add_mem _) fun c f _ hf => f.C_mul' c ▸ Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hf
⟨s, le_antisymm (Ideal.span_le.2 fun x hx =>
have : x ∈ I.degreeLE N := hs ▸ Submodule.subset_span hx
this.2) <| by
have : Submodule.span R[X] ↑s = Ideal.span ↑s := rfl
rw [this]
intro p hp
generalize hn : p.natDegree = k
induction' k using Nat.strong_induction_on with k ih generalizing p
rcases le_or_lt k N with h | h
· subst k
refine hs2 ⟨Polynomial.mem_degreeLE.2
(le_trans Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 h), hp⟩
· have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
cases hn
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ h
have : (0 : R) ≠ 1 := by
intro h
apply hp0
ext i
refine (mul_one _).symm.trans ?_
rw [← h, mul_zero]
rfl
haveI : Nontrivial R := ⟨⟨0, 1, this⟩⟩
have : p.leadingCoeff ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth N := by
rw [HN]
exact hm2 k ((I.mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _).2
⟨_, hp, hn ▸ Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩)
rw [I.mem_leadingCoeffNth] at this
rcases this with ⟨q, hq, hdq, hlqp⟩
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := by
intro H
rw [← Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at H
rw [hlqp, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at H
exact hp0 H
have h1 : p.degree = (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree)).degree := by
rw [Polynomial.degree_mul', Polynomial.degree_X_pow]
· rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hq0]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le, hn]
· refine le_trans (Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le hdq) (le_of_lt h)
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff_X_pow, mul_one]
exact mt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hq0
have h2 : p.leadingCoeff = (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree)).leadingCoeff := by
rw [← hlqp, Polynomial.leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow]
have := Polynomial.degree_sub_lt h1 hp0 h2
rw [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hp0] at this
rw [← sub_add_cancel p (q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree))]
convert (Ideal.span ↑s).add_mem _ ((Ideal.span (s : Set R[X])).mul_mem_right _ _)
· by_cases hpq : p - q * Polynomial.X ^ (k - q.natDegree) = 0
· rw [hpq]
exact Ideal.zero_mem _
refine ih _ ?_ (I.sub_mem hp (I.mul_mem_right _ hq)) rfl
rwa [Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree hpq, Nat.cast_lt, hn] at this
exact hs2 ⟨Polynomial.mem_degreeLE.2 hdq, hq⟩⟩⟩
attribute [instance] Polynomial.isNoetherianRing
namespace Polynomial
theorem linearIndependent_powers_iff_aeval (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (v : M) :
(LinearIndependent R fun n : ℕ => (f ^ n) v) ↔ ∀ p : R[X], aeval f p v = 0 → p = 0 := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff]
simp only [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply, aeval_endomorphism, forall_iff_forall_finsupp, Sum,
support, coeff, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_ker_aeval_of_isCoprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]} (hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
Disjoint (LinearMap.ker (aeval f p)) (LinearMap.ker (aeval f q)) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
intro v hv
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
simpa [LinearMap.mem_ker.1 (Submodule.mem_inf.1 hv).1,
LinearMap.mem_ker.1 (Submodule.mem_inf.1 hv).2] using
congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias disjoint_ker_aeval_of_coprime := disjoint_ker_aeval_of_isCoprime
theorem sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_isCoprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]} (hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
LinearMap.range (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.range (aeval f q) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
intro v _
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
use aeval f (p * p') v
use LinearMap.mem_range.2 ⟨aeval f p' v, by simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, aeval_mul]⟩
use aeval f (q * q') v
use LinearMap.mem_range.2 ⟨aeval f q' v, by simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, aeval_mul]⟩
simpa only [mul_comm p p', mul_comm q q', aeval_one, aeval_add] using
congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")]
alias sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_coprime := sup_aeval_range_eq_top_of_isCoprime
theorem sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul {f : M →ₗ[R] M} {p q : R[X]} :
LinearMap.ker (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.ker (aeval f q) ≤ LinearMap.ker (aeval f (p * q)) := by
intro v hv
rcases Submodule.mem_sup.1 hv with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
have h_eval_x : aeval f (p * q) x = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm, aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hx, LinearMap.map_zero]
have h_eval_y : aeval f (p * q) y = 0 := by
rw [aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hy, LinearMap.map_zero]
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker, ← hxy, LinearMap.map_add, h_eval_x, h_eval_y, add_zero]
theorem sup_ker_aeval_eq_ker_aeval_mul_of_coprime (f : M →ₗ[R] M) {p q : R[X]}
(hpq : IsCoprime p q) :
LinearMap.ker (aeval f p) ⊔ LinearMap.ker (aeval f q) = LinearMap.ker (aeval f (p * q)) := by
apply le_antisymm sup_ker_aeval_le_ker_aeval_mul
intro v hv
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
rcases hpq with ⟨p', q', hpq'⟩
have h_eval₂_qpp' :=
calc
aeval f (q * (p * p')) v = aeval f (p' * (p * q)) v := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm q p]
_ = 0 := by rw [aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hv, LinearMap.map_zero]
have h_eval₂_pqq' :=
calc
aeval f (p * (q * q')) v = aeval f (q' * (p * q)) v := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm]
_ = 0 := by rw [aeval_mul, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hv, LinearMap.map_zero]
rw [aeval_mul] at h_eval₂_qpp' h_eval₂_pqq'
refine
⟨aeval f (q * q') v, LinearMap.mem_ker.1 h_eval₂_pqq', aeval f (p * p') v,
LinearMap.mem_ker.1 h_eval₂_qpp', ?_⟩
rw [add_comm, mul_comm p p', mul_comm q q']
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, aeval_one] using congr_arg (fun p : R[X] => aeval f p v) hpq'
end Polynomial
namespace MvPolynomial
lemma aeval_natDegree_le {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {m n : ℕ}
(F : MvPolynomial σ R) (hF : F.totalDegree ≤ m)
(f : σ → Polynomial R) (hf : ∀ i, (f i).natDegree ≤ n) :
(MvPolynomial.aeval f F).natDegree ≤ m * n := by
rw [MvPolynomial.aeval_def, MvPolynomial.eval₂]
apply (Polynomial.natDegree_sum_le _ _).trans
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, ← C_eq_algebraMap]
apply (Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_le _ _).trans
apply (Polynomial.natDegree_prod_le _ _).trans
have : ∑ i ∈ d.support, (d i) * n ≤ m * n := by
rw [← Finset.sum_mul]
apply mul_le_mul' (.trans _ hF) le_rfl
rw [MvPolynomial.totalDegree]
exact Finset.le_sup_of_le hd le_rfl
apply (Finset.sum_le_sum _).trans this
rintro i -
apply Polynomial.natDegree_pow_le.trans
exact mul_le_mul' le_rfl (hf i)
theorem isNoetherianRing_fin_0 [IsNoetherianRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin 0) R) := by
apply isNoetherianRing_of_ringEquiv R
symm; apply MvPolynomial.isEmptyRingEquiv R (Fin 0)
theorem isNoetherianRing_fin [IsNoetherianRing R] :
∀ {n : ℕ}, IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)
| 0 => isNoetherianRing_fin_0
| n + 1 =>
@isNoetherianRing_of_ringEquiv (Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) _ _ _
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv _ n).toRingEquiv.symm
(@Polynomial.isNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) _ isNoetherianRing_fin)
/-- The multivariate polynomial ring in finitely many variables over a noetherian ring
is itself a noetherian ring. -/
instance isNoetherianRing [Finite σ] [IsNoetherianRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing (MvPolynomial σ R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype σ
exact
@isNoetherianRing_of_ringEquiv (MvPolynomial (Fin (Fintype.card σ)) R) _ _ _
(renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin σ).symm).toRingEquiv isNoetherianRing_fin
/-- Auxiliary lemma:
Multivariate polynomials over an integral domain
with variables indexed by `Fin n` form an integral domain.
This fact is proven inductively,
and then used to prove the general case without any finiteness hypotheses.
See `MvPolynomial.noZeroDivisors` for the general case. -/
theorem noZeroDivisors_fin (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
∀ n : ℕ, NoZeroDivisors (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)
| 0 => (MvPolynomial.isEmptyAlgEquiv R _).injective.noZeroDivisors _ (map_zero _) (map_mul _)
| n + 1 =>
haveI := noZeroDivisors_fin R n
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).injective.noZeroDivisors _ (map_zero _) (map_mul _)
/-- Auxiliary definition:
Multivariate polynomials in finitely many variables over an integral domain form an integral domain.
This fact is proven by transport of structure from the `MvPolynomial.noZeroDivisors_fin`,
and then used to prove the general case without finiteness hypotheses.
See `MvPolynomial.noZeroDivisors` for the general case. -/
theorem noZeroDivisors_of_finite (R : Type u) (σ : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [Finite σ]
[NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (MvPolynomial σ R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype σ
haveI := noZeroDivisors_fin R (Fintype.card σ)
exact (renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin σ)).injective.noZeroDivisors _ (map_zero _) (map_mul _)
instance {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {σ : Type v} :
NoZeroDivisors (MvPolynomial σ R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {p q} h := by
obtain ⟨s, p, q, rfl, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename₂ p q
let _nzd := MvPolynomial.noZeroDivisors_of_finite R s
have : p * q = 0 := by
apply rename_injective _ Subtype.val_injective
simpa using h
rw [mul_eq_zero] at this
apply this.imp <;> rintro rfl <;> simp
/-- The multivariate polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain. -/
instance isDomain {R : Type u} {σ : Type v} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
IsDomain (MvPolynomial σ R) := by
apply @NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain (MvPolynomial σ R) _ ?_ _
apply AddMonoidAlgebra.nontrivial
-- instance {R : Type u} {σ : Type v} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] :
-- IsDomain (MvPolynomial σ R)[X] := inferInstance
theorem map_mvPolynomial_eq_eval₂ {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Finite σ]
(ϕ : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
ϕ p = MvPolynomial.eval₂ (ϕ.comp MvPolynomial.C) (fun s => ϕ (MvPolynomial.X s)) p := by
cases nonempty_fintype σ
refine Trans.trans (congr_arg ϕ (MvPolynomial.as_sum p)) ?_
rw [MvPolynomial.eval₂_eq', map_sum ϕ]
congr
ext
simp only [monomial_eq, ϕ.map_pow, map_prod ϕ, ϕ.comp_apply, ϕ.map_mul, Finsupp.prod_pow]
/-- If every coefficient of a polynomial is in an ideal `I`, then so is the polynomial itself,
multivariate version. -/
theorem mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(hcoe : ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, p.coeff m ∈ I.comap (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R)) : p ∈ I := by
rw [as_sum p]
suffices ∀ m ∈ p.support, monomial m (MvPolynomial.coeff m p) ∈ I by
exact Submodule.sum_mem I this
intro m _
rw [← mul_one (coeff m p), ← C_mul_monomial]
suffices C (coeff m p) ∈ I by exact I.mul_mem_right (monomial m 1) this
simpa [Ideal.mem_comap] using hcoe m
/-- The push-forward of an ideal `I` of `R` to `MvPolynomial σ R` via inclusion
is exactly the set of polynomials whose coefficients are in `I` -/
theorem mem_map_C_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
f ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R)) ↔
∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, f.coeff m ∈ I := by
classical
constructor
· intro hf
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hf
· intro f hf n
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hf
rw [← hx.right, coeff_C]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simpa [h] using hx.left
· simp [Ne.symm h]
· simp
· exact fun f g _ _ hf hg n => by simp [I.add_mem (hf n) (hg n)]
· refine fun f g _ hg n => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul]
exact I.sum_mem fun c _ => I.mul_mem_left (f.coeff c.fst) (hg c.snd)
· intro hf
rw [as_sum f]
suffices ∀ m ∈ f.support, monomial m (coeff m f) ∈ (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R)) by
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ this
intro m _
rw [← mul_one (coeff m f), ← C_mul_monomial]
suffices C (coeff m f) ∈ (Ideal.map C I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ R)) by
exact Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ this
apply Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _
exact hf m
theorem ker_map (f : R →+* S) :
RingHom.ker (map f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) =
Ideal.map (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (RingHom.ker f) := by
ext
rw [MvPolynomial.mem_map_C_iff, RingHom.mem_ker, MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp_rw [coeff_map, coeff_zero, RingHom.mem_ker]
lemma ker_mapAlgHom {S₁ S₂ σ : Type*} [CommRing S₁] [CommRing S₂] [Algebra R S₁]
[Algebra R S₂] (f : S₁ →ₐ[R] S₂) :
RingHom.ker (MvPolynomial.mapAlgHom (σ := σ) f) = Ideal.map MvPolynomial.C (RingHom.ker f) :=
MvPolynomial.ker_map (f.toRingHom : S₁ →+* S₂)
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 1,244 | 1,271 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem isLindelof_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Countable ι] (h : ∀ i, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i, f i) := (countable_range f).isLindelof_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof (hs : s.Countable) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof (hs : s.Finite) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem IsLindelof.countable_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsLindelof s) :
s.Countable := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, ht, _, hssubt⟩
rw [biUnion_of_singleton] at hssubt
exact ht.mono hssubt
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology X] : IsLindelof s ↔ s.Countable :=
⟨fun h => h.countable_of_discrete, fun h => h.isLindelof⟩
theorem IsLindelof.union (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsLindelof t) : IsLindelof (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isLindelof_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsLindelof.insert (hs : IsLindelof s) (a) : IsLindelof (insert a s) :=
isLindelof_singleton.union hs
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isLindelof_open_iff_eq_countable_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsLindelof (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsLindelof U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Countable ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨Y, f, rfl, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion h₂
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
h₁.elim_countable_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) Subset.rfl
refine ⟨t.image f', Countable.image (ht.1) f', le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht.2 ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
rw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := (mem_image ..).mp hi
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
/-- `Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets. -/
def Filter.coLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
--`Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coLindelof : (coLindelof X).HasBasis IsLindelof compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isLindelof_empty⟩
theorem mem_coLindelof : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_iff
theorem mem_coLindelof' : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_coLindelof.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof (hs : IsLindelof s) : sᶜ ∈ coLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_of_mem hs
theorem coLindelof_le_cofinite : coLindelof X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof
theorem Tendsto.isLindelof_insert_range_of_coLindelof {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (coLindelof X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne _ hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff_nonempty, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_coLindelof.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
/-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets. -/
def Filter.coclosedLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsClosed s) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coclosedLindelof :
(Filter.coclosedLindelof X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsLindelof s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedLindelof, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isLindelof_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
theorem mem_coclosedLindelof : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_iff, and_assoc]
theorem mem_coclosed_Lindelof' : s ∈ coclosedLindelof X ↔
∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t := by
simp only [mem_coclosedLindelof, compl_subset_comm]
theorem coLindelof_le_coclosedLindelof : coLindelof X ≤ coclosedLindelof X :=
iInf_mono fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
theorem IsLindeof.compl_mem_coclosedLindelof_of_isClosed (hs : IsLindelof s) (hs' : IsClosed s) :
sᶜ ∈ Filter.coclosedLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coclosedLindelof.mem_of_mem ⟨hs', hs⟩
/-- X is a Lindelöf space iff every open cover has a countable subcover. -/
class LindelofSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- In a Lindelöf space, `Set.univ` is a Lindelöf set. -/
isLindelof_univ : IsLindelof (univ : Set X)
instance (priority := 10) Subsingleton.lindelofSpace [Subsingleton X] : LindelofSpace X :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.isLindelof⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ_iff : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) ↔ LindelofSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
theorem isLindelof_univ [h : LindelofSpace X] : IsLindelof (univ : Set X) :=
h.isLindelof_univ
theorem cluster_point_of_Lindelof [LindelofSpace X] (f : Filter X) [NeBot f]
[CountableInterFilter f] : ∃ x, ClusterPt x f := by
simpa using isLindelof_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ by simp)
theorem LindelofSpace.elim_nhds_subcover [LindelofSpace X] (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ := by
obtain ⟨t, tc, -, s⟩ := IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover isLindelof_univ U fun x _ => hU x
use t, tc
apply top_unique s
theorem lindelofSpace_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → ⋂ i, t i = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i = ∅) :
LindelofSpace X where
isLindelof_univ := isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed fun t => by simpa using h t
theorem IsClosed.isLindelof [LindelofSpace X] (h : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_univ.of_isClosed_subset h (subset_univ _)
/-- A compact set `s` is Lindelöf. -/
| theorem IsCompact.isLindelof (hs : IsCompact s) :
IsLindelof s := by tauto
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 511 | 512 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
/-!
# The Karoubi envelope of a category
In this file, we define the Karoubi envelope `Karoubi C` of a category `C`.
## Main constructions and definitions
- `Karoubi C` is the Karoubi envelope of a category `C`: it is an idempotent
complete category. It is also preadditive when `C` is preadditive.
- `toKaroubi C : C ⥤ Karoubi C` is a fully faithful functor, which is an equivalence
(`toKaroubiIsEquivalence`) when `C` is idempotent complete.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
namespace Idempotents
/-- In a preadditive category `C`, when an object `X` decomposes as `X ≅ P ⨿ Q`, one may
consider `P` as a direct factor of `X` and up to unique isomorphism, it is determined by the
obvious idempotent `X ⟶ P ⟶ X` which is the projection onto `P` with kernel `Q`. More generally,
one may define a formal direct factor of an object `X : C` : it consists of an idempotent
`p : X ⟶ X` which is thought as the "formal image" of `p`. The type `Karoubi C` shall be the
type of the objects of the karoubi envelope of `C`. It makes sense for any category `C`. -/
structure Karoubi where
/-- an object of the underlying category -/
X : C
/-- an endomorphism of the object -/
p : X ⟶ X
/-- the condition that the given endomorphism is an idempotent -/
idem : p ≫ p = p := by aesop_cat
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] idem
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (h_X : P.X = Q.X) (h_p : P.p ≫ eqToHom h_X = eqToHom h_X ≫ Q.p) :
P = Q := by
cases P
cases Q
dsimp at h_X h_p
subst h_X
simpa only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and, eqToHom_refl, comp_id, id_comp] using h_p
/-- A morphism `P ⟶ Q` in the category `Karoubi C` is a morphism in the underlying category
`C` which satisfies a relation, which in the preadditive case, expresses that it induces a
map between the corresponding "formal direct factors" and that it vanishes on the complement
formal direct factor. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (P Q : Karoubi C) where
/-- a morphism between the underlying objects -/
f : P.X ⟶ Q.X
/-- compatibility of the given morphism with the given idempotents -/
comm : f = P.p ≫ f ≫ Q.p := by aesop_cat
instance [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : Inhabited (Hom P Q) :=
⟨⟨0, by rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]⟩⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem p_comp {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f := by rw [f.comm, ← assoc, P.idem]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_p {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : f.f ≫ Q.p = f.f := by
rw [f.comm, assoc, assoc, Q.idem]
@[reassoc]
theorem p_comm {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f ≫ Q.p := by rw [p_comp, comp_p]
theorem comp_proof {P Q R : Karoubi C} (g : Hom Q R) (f : Hom P Q) :
f.f ≫ g.f = P.p ≫ (f.f ≫ g.f) ≫ R.p := by rw [assoc, comp_p, ← assoc, p_comp]
/-- The category structure on the karoubi envelope of a category. -/
instance : Category (Karoubi C) where
Hom := Karoubi.Hom
id P := ⟨P.p, by repeat' rw [P.idem]⟩
comp f g := ⟨f.f ≫ g.f, Karoubi.comp_proof g f⟩
@[simp]
theorem hom_ext_iff {P Q : Karoubi C} {f g : P ⟶ Q} : f = g ↔ f.f = g.f := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· apply Hom.ext
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (f g : P ⟶ Q) (h : f.f = g.f) : f = g := by
simpa [hom_ext_iff] using h
@[simp]
theorem comp_f {P Q R : Karoubi C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) : (f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_f {P : Karoubi C} : Hom.f (𝟙 P) = P.p := rfl
/-- It is possible to coerce an object of `C` into an object of `Karoubi C`.
See also the functor `toKaroubi`. -/
instance coe : CoeTC C (Karoubi C) :=
⟨fun X => ⟨X, 𝟙 X, by rw [comp_id]⟩⟩
theorem coe_X (X : C) : (X : Karoubi C).X = X := by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_p (X : C) : (X : Karoubi C).p = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {P Q : Karoubi C} (h : P = Q) :
Karoubi.Hom.f (eqToHom h) = P.p ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg Karoubi.X h) := by
subst h
simp only [eqToHom_refl, Karoubi.id_f, comp_id]
end Karoubi
/-- The obvious fully faithful functor `toKaroubi` sends an object `X : C` to the obvious
formal direct factor of `X` given by `𝟙 X`. -/
@[simps]
def toKaroubi : C ⥤ Karoubi C where
obj X := ⟨X, 𝟙 X, by rw [comp_id]⟩
map f := ⟨f, by simp only [comp_id, id_comp]⟩
instance : (toKaroubi C).Full where map_surjective f := ⟨f.f, rfl⟩
instance : (toKaroubi C).Faithful where
map_injective := fun h => congr_arg Karoubi.Hom.f h
variable {C}
@[simps add]
instance instAdd [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Add (P ⟶ Q) where
add f g := ⟨f.f + g.f, by rw [add_comp, comp_add, ← f.comm, ← g.comm]⟩
@[simps neg]
instance instNeg [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Neg (P ⟶ Q) where
neg f := ⟨-f.f, by simpa only [neg_comp, comp_neg, neg_inj] using f.comm⟩
@[simps zero]
instance instZero [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Zero (P ⟶ Q) where
zero := ⟨0, by simp only [comp_zero, zero_comp]⟩
instance instAddCommGroupHom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : AddCommGroup (P ⟶ Q) where
zero_add f := by
ext
apply zero_add
add_zero f := by
ext
apply add_zero
add_assoc f g h' := by
ext
apply add_assoc
add_comm f g := by
ext
apply add_comm
neg_add_cancel f := by
ext
apply neg_add_cancel
zsmul := zsmulRec
nsmul := nsmulRec
namespace Karoubi
theorem hom_eq_zero_iff [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} {f : P ⟶ Q} : f = 0 ↔ f.f = 0 :=
hom_ext_iff
/-- The map sending `f : P ⟶ Q` to `f.f : P.X ⟶ Q.X` is additive. -/
@[simps]
def inclusionHom [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : AddMonoidHom (P ⟶ Q) (P.X ⟶ Q.X) where
toFun f := f.f
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_hom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → (P ⟶ Q)) :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).f = ∑ x ∈ s, (f x).f :=
map_sum (inclusionHom P Q) f s
end Karoubi
/-- The category `Karoubi C` is preadditive if `C` is. -/
instance [Preadditive C] : Preadditive (Karoubi C) where
homGroup P Q := by infer_instance
instance [Preadditive C] : Functor.Additive (toKaroubi C) where
open Karoubi
variable (C)
instance : IsIdempotentComplete (Karoubi C) := by
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro P p hp
simp only [hom_ext_iff, comp_f] at hp
use ⟨P.X, p.f, hp⟩
use ⟨p.f, by rw [comp_p p, hp]⟩
use ⟨p.f, by rw [hp, p_comp p]⟩
simp [hp]
instance [IsIdempotentComplete C] : (toKaroubi C).EssSurj :=
⟨fun P => by
rcases IsIdempotentComplete.idempotents_split P.X P.p P.idem with ⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
use Y
exact
Nonempty.intro
{ hom := ⟨i, by erw [id_comp, ← h₂, ← assoc, h₁, id_comp]⟩
inv := ⟨e, by erw [comp_id, ← h₂, assoc, h₁, comp_id]⟩ }⟩
/-- If `C` is idempotent complete, the functor `toKaroubi : C ⥤ Karoubi C` is an equivalence. -/
instance toKaroubi_isEquivalence [IsIdempotentComplete C] : (toKaroubi C).IsEquivalence where
/-- The equivalence `C ≅ Karoubi C` when `C` is idempotent complete. -/
def toKaroubiEquivalence [IsIdempotentComplete C] : C ≌ Karoubi C :=
(toKaroubi C).asEquivalence
instance toKaroubiEquivalence_functor_additive [Preadditive C] [IsIdempotentComplete C] :
(toKaroubiEquivalence C).functor.Additive :=
(inferInstance : (toKaroubi C).Additive)
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
/-- The split mono which appears in the factorisation `decompId P`. -/
@[simps]
def decompId_i (P : Karoubi C) : P ⟶ P.X :=
⟨P.p, by rw [coe_p, comp_id, P.idem]⟩
/-- The split epi which appears in the factorisation `decompId P`. -/
@[simps]
def decompId_p (P : Karoubi C) : (P.X : Karoubi C) ⟶ P :=
⟨P.p, by rw [coe_p, id_comp, P.idem]⟩
/-- The formal direct factor of `P.X` given by the idempotent `P.p` in the category `C`
is actually a direct factor in the category `Karoubi C`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem decompId (P : Karoubi C) : 𝟙 P = decompId_i P ≫ decompId_p P := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, id_f, P.idem, decompId_i, decompId_p]
theorem decomp_p (P : Karoubi C) : (toKaroubi C).map P.p = decompId_p P ≫ decompId_i P := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, decompId_p_f, decompId_i_f, P.idem, toKaroubi_map_f]
theorem decompId_i_toKaroubi (X : C) : decompId_i ((toKaroubi C).obj X) = 𝟙 _ := by
rfl
theorem decompId_p_toKaroubi (X : C) : decompId_p ((toKaroubi C).obj X) = 𝟙 _ := by
rfl
theorem decompId_i_naturality {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
f ≫ decompId_i Q = decompId_i P ≫ (by exact Hom.mk f.f (by simp)) := by
simp
theorem decompId_p_naturality {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
decompId_p P ≫ f = (by exact Hom.mk f.f (by simp)) ≫ decompId_p Q := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_hom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} (n : ℤ) (f : P ⟶ Q) : (n • f).f = n • f.f :=
map_zsmul (inclusionHom P Q) n f
end Karoubi
end Idempotents
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Idempotents/Karoubi.lean | 290 | 292 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Basic
/-!
# The category of arrows
The category of arrows, with morphisms commutative squares.
We set this up as a specialization of the comma category `Comma L R`,
where `L` and `R` are both the identity functor.
## Tags
comma, arrow
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
variable {T : Type u} [Category.{v} T]
section
variable (T)
/-- The arrow category of `T` has as objects all morphisms in `T` and as morphisms commutative
squares in `T`. -/
def Arrow :=
Comma.{v, v, v} (𝟭 T) (𝟭 T)
-- The `Category` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Category (Arrow T) := commaCategory
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter
instance Arrow.inhabited [Inhabited T] : Inhabited (Arrow T) where
default := show Comma (𝟭 T) (𝟭 T) from default
end
namespace Arrow
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {X Y : Arrow T} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h₁ : f.left = g.left) (h₂ : f.right = g.right) :
f = g :=
CommaMorphism.ext h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem id_left (f : Arrow T) : CommaMorphism.left (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 f.left :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_right (f : Arrow T) : CommaMorphism.right (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 f.right :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_left {X Y Z : Arrow T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).left = f.left ≫ g.left := rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_right {X Y Z : Arrow T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).right = f.right ≫ g.right := rfl
/-- An object in the arrow category is simply a morphism in `T`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {X Y : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow T where
left := X
right := Y
hom := f
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (f : Arrow T) : Arrow.mk f.hom = f := by
cases f
rfl
theorem mk_injective (A B : T) :
Function.Injective (Arrow.mk : (A ⟶ B) → Arrow T) := fun f g h => by
| cases h
rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Comma/Arrow.lean | 86 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
/-!
# Normed spaces over R or C
This file is about results on normed spaces over the fields `ℝ` and `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
None.
## Main theorems
* `ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_bound_of_ball_bound`: A bound on the norms of values of a linear
map in a ball yields a bound on the operator norm.
## Notes
This file exists mainly to avoid importing `RCLike` in the main normed space theory files.
-/
open Metric
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem RCLike.norm_coe_norm {z : E} : ‖(‖z‖ : 𝕜)‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
/-- Lemma to normalize a vector in a normed space `E` over either `ℂ` or `ℝ` to unit length. -/
@[simp]
theorem norm_smul_inv_norm {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ‖(‖x‖⁻¹ : 𝕜) • x‖ = 1 := by
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul]
/-- Lemma to normalize a vector in a normed space `E` over either `ℂ` or `ℝ` to length `r`. -/
theorem norm_smul_inv_norm' {r : ℝ} (r_nonneg : 0 ≤ r) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
‖((r : 𝕜) * (‖x‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹) • x‖ = r := by
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul, r_nonneg, rclike_simps]
theorem LinearMap.bound_of_sphere_bound {r : ℝ} (r_pos : 0 < r) (c : ℝ) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜)
(h : ∀ z ∈ sphere (0 : E) r, ‖f z‖ ≤ c) (z : E) : ‖f z‖ ≤ c / r * ‖z‖ := by
by_cases z_zero : z = 0
· rw [z_zero]
simp only [LinearMap.map_zero, norm_zero, mul_zero]
| exact le_rfl
set z₁ := ((r : 𝕜) * (‖z‖ : 𝕜)⁻¹) • z with hz₁
have norm_f_z₁ : ‖f z₁‖ ≤ c := by
apply h
rw [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm]
exact norm_smul_inv_norm' r_pos.le z_zero
have r_ne_zero : (r : 𝕜) ≠ 0 := RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr r_pos.ne'
have eq : f z = ‖z‖ / r * f z₁ := by
rw [hz₁, LinearMap.map_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel₀ _ r_ne_zero, mul_inv_cancel₀, one_mul]
simp only [z_zero, RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
rw [eq, norm_mul, norm_div, RCLike.norm_coe_norm, RCLike.norm_of_nonneg r_pos.le,
div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
apply div_le_div₀ _ _ r_pos rfl.ge
· exact mul_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans norm_f_z₁) (norm_nonneg z)
apply mul_le_mul norm_f_z₁ rfl.le (norm_nonneg z) ((norm_nonneg _).trans norm_f_z₁)
/-- `LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound` is a version of this over arbitrary nontrivially normed fields.
It produces a less precise bound so we keep both versions. -/
theorem LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound' {r : ℝ} (r_pos : 0 < r) (c : ℝ) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜)
(h : ∀ z ∈ closedBall (0 : E) r, ‖f z‖ ≤ c) (z : E) : ‖f z‖ ≤ c / r * ‖z‖ :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/RCLike.lean | 55 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.DotProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Dual
/-!
# Rank of matrices
The rank of a matrix `A` is defined to be the rank of range of the linear map corresponding to `A`.
This definition does not depend on the choice of basis, see `Matrix.rank_eq_finrank_range_toLin`.
## Main declarations
* `Matrix.rank`: the rank of a matrix
* `Matrix.cRank`: the rank of a matrix as a cardinal
* `Matrix.eRank`: the rank of a matrix as a term in `ℕ∞`.
-/
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
open Module Cardinal Set Submodule
universe ul um um₀ un un₀ uo uR
variable {l : Type ul} {m : Type um} {m₀ : Type um₀} {n : Type un} {n₀ : Type un₀} {o : Type uo}
variable {R : Type uR}
section Infinite
variable [Semiring R]
/-- The rank of a matrix, defined as the dimension of its column space, as a cardinal. -/
noncomputable def cRank (A : Matrix m n R) : Cardinal := Module.rank R <| span R <| range Aᵀ
lemma cRank_toNat_eq_finrank (A : Matrix m n R) :
A.cRank.toNat = Module.finrank R (span R (range A.col)) := rfl
lemma lift_cRank_submatrix_le (A : Matrix m n R) (r : m₀ → m) (c : n₀ → n) :
lift.{um} (A.submatrix r c).cRank ≤ lift.{um₀} A.cRank := by
have h : ((A.submatrix r id).submatrix id c).cRank ≤ (A.submatrix r id).cRank :=
Submodule.rank_mono <| span_mono <| by rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨c x, rfl⟩
refine (Cardinal.lift_monotone h).trans ?_
let f : (m → R) →ₗ[R] (m₀ → R) := LinearMap.funLeft R R r
have h_eq : Submodule.map f (span R (range Aᵀ)) = span R (range (A.submatrix r id)ᵀ) := by
rw [LinearMap.map_span, ← image_univ, image_image, transpose_submatrix]
aesop
rw [cRank, ← h_eq]
have hwin := lift_rank_map_le f (span R (range Aᵀ))
simp_rw [← lift_umax] at hwin ⊢
exact hwin
/-- A special case of `lift_cRank_submatrix_le` for when `m₀` and `m` are in the same universe. -/
lemma cRank_submatrix_le {m m₀ : Type um} (A : Matrix m n R) (r : m₀ → m) (c : n₀ → n) :
(A.submatrix r c).cRank ≤ A.cRank := by
simpa using lift_cRank_submatrix_le A r c
lemma cRank_le_card_height [StrongRankCondition R] [Fintype m] (A : Matrix m n R) :
A.cRank ≤ Fintype.card m :=
(Submodule.rank_le (span R (range Aᵀ))).trans <| by rw [rank_fun']
lemma cRank_le_card_width [StrongRankCondition R] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix m n R) :
A.cRank ≤ Fintype.card n :=
(rank_span_le ..).trans <| by simpa using Cardinal.mk_range_le_lift (f := Aᵀ)
/-- The rank of a matrix, defined as the dimension of its column space, as a term in `ℕ∞`. -/
noncomputable def eRank (A : Matrix m n R) : ℕ∞ := A.cRank.toENat
lemma eRank_toNat_eq_finrank (A : Matrix m n R) :
A.eRank.toNat = Module.finrank R (span R (range A.col)) :=
toNat_toENat ..
lemma eRank_submatrix_le (A : Matrix m n R) (r : m₀ → m) (c : n₀ → n) :
(A.submatrix r c).eRank ≤ A.eRank := by
simpa using OrderHom.mono (β := ℕ∞) Cardinal.toENat <| lift_cRank_submatrix_le A r c
lemma eRank_le_card_width [StrongRankCondition R] (A : Matrix m n R) : A.eRank ≤ ENat.card n := by
wlog hfin : Finite n
· simp [ENat.card_eq_top.2 (by simpa using hfin)]
have _ := Fintype.ofFinite n
rw [ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, eRank, toENat_le_nat]
exact A.cRank_le_card_width
lemma eRank_le_card_height [StrongRankCondition R] (A : Matrix m n R) : A.eRank ≤ ENat.card m := by
classical
wlog hfin : Finite m
· simp [ENat.card_eq_top.2 (by simpa using hfin)]
| have _ := Fintype.ofFinite m
rw [ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, eRank, toENat_le_nat]
exact A.cRank_le_card_height
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Rank.lean | 96 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
/-!
# Binary map of options
This file defines the binary map of `Option`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations
on intervals.
## Main declarations
* `Option.map₂`: Binary map of options.
## Notes
This file is very similar to the n-ary section of `Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic`, to
`Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry` and to `Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry`. Please keep them in sync.
We do not define `Option.map₃` as its only purpose so far would be to prove properties of
`Option.map₂` and casing already fulfills this task.
-/
universe u
open Function
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {f : α → β → γ} {a : Option α} {b : Option β} {c : Option γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Option α → Option β → Option γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) : Option γ :=
a.bind fun a => b.map <| f a
/-- `Option.map₂` in terms of monadic operations. Note that this can't be taken as the definition
because of the lack of universe polymorphism. -/
theorem map₂_def {α β γ : Type u} (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ f a b = f <$> a <*> b := by
cases a <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_some_some (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f (some a) (some b) = f a b := rfl
theorem map₂_coe_coe (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = f a b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_none_left (f : α → β → γ) (b : Option β) : map₂ f none b = none := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_none_right (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) : map₂ f a none = none := by cases a <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_coe_left (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : Option β) : map₂ f a b = b.map fun b => f a b :=
rfl
-- Porting note: This proof was `rfl` in Lean3, but now is not.
@[simp]
theorem map₂_coe_right (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : β) :
map₂ f a b = a.map fun a => f a b := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem mem_map₂_iff {c : γ} : c ∈ map₂ f a b ↔ ∃ a' b', a' ∈ a ∧ b' ∈ b ∧ f a' b' = c := by
simp [map₂, bind_eq_some]
/-- `simp`-normal form of `mem_map₂_iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_some_iff {c : γ} :
map₂ f a b = some c ↔ ∃ a' b', a' ∈ a ∧ b' ∈ b ∧ f a' b' = c := by
simp [map₂, bind_eq_some]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_none_iff : map₂ f a b = none ↔ a = none ∨ b = none := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem map₂_swap (f : α → β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ f a b = map₂ (fun a b => f b a) b a := by cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
theorem map_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
(map₂ f a b).map g = map₂ (fun a b => g (f a b)) a b := by cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
theorem map₂_map_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
map₂ f (a.map g) b = map₂ (fun a b => f (g a) b) a b := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem map₂_map_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
map₂ f a (b.map g) = map₂ (fun a b => f a (g b)) a b := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
map₂ (curry f) a b = Option.map f (map₂ Prod.mk a b) := (map_map₂ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem map_uncurry (f : α → β → γ) (x : Option (α × β)) :
x.map (uncurry f) = map₂ f (x.map Prod.fst) (x.map Prod.snd) := by cases x <;> rfl
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Option.map₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `map₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `map₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`map₂ (*) a b = map₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
variable {α' β' δ' ε ε' : Type*}
theorem map₂_assoc {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε} {g' : β → γ → ε'}
(h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
map₂ f (map₂ g a b) c = map₂ f' a (map₂ g' b c) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> simp [h_assoc]
theorem map₂_comm {g : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, f a b = g b a) : map₂ f a b = map₂ g b a := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [h_comm]
theorem map₂_left_comm {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ} {f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : β → δ' → ε}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' b (f' a c)) :
map₂ f a (map₂ g b c) = map₂ g' b (map₂ f' a c) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> simp [h_left_comm]
| theorem map₂_right_comm {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : δ' → β → ε}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = g' (f' a c) b) :
map₂ f (map₂ g a b) c = map₂ g' (map₂ f' a c) b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> simp [h_right_comm]
| Mathlib/Data/Option/NAry.lean | 124 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
/-!
# Convolution of functions
This file defines the convolution on two functions, i.e. `x ↦ ∫ f(t)g(x - t) ∂t`.
In the general case, these functions can be vector-valued, and have an arbitrary (additive)
group as domain. We use a continuous bilinear operation `L` on these function values as
"multiplication". The domain must be equipped with a Haar measure `μ`
(though many individual results have weaker conditions on `μ`).
For many applications we can take `L = ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ` or
`L = ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℝ`.
We also define `ConvolutionExists` and `ConvolutionExistsAt` to state that the convolution is
well-defined (everywhere or at a single point). These conditions are needed for pointwise
computations (e.g. `ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add`), but are generally not strong enough for any
local (or global) properties of the convolution. For this we need stronger assumptions on `f`
and/or `g`, and generally if we impose stronger conditions on one of the functions, we can impose
weaker conditions on the other.
We have proven many of the properties of the convolution assuming one of these functions
has compact support (in which case the other function only needs to be locally integrable).
We still need to prove the properties for other pairs of conditions (e.g. both functions are
rapidly decreasing)
# Design Decisions
We use a bilinear map `L` to "multiply" the two functions in the integrand.
This generality has several advantages
* This allows us to compute the total derivative of the convolution, in case the functions are
multivariate. The total derivative is again a convolution, but where the codomains of the
functions can be higher-dimensional. See `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right`.
* This allows us to use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (which would not be possible if we would use
`mul`/`smul` in the integral, since `@[to_additive]` will incorrectly also try to additivize
those definitions).
* We need to support the case where at least one of the functions is vector-valued, but if we use
`smul` to multiply the functions, that would be an asymmetric definition.
# Main Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.convolution f g L μ x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ`
is the convolution of `f` and `g` w.r.t. the continuous bilinear map `L` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ` states that the convolution `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x`
is well-defined (i.e. the integral exists).
* `MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists f g L μ` states that the convolution `f ⋆[L, μ] g`
is well-defined at each point.
# Main Results
* `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left`: we can compute the total derivative
of the convolution as a convolution with the total derivative of the right (left) function.
* `HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_left`: the convolution is `𝒞ⁿ` if one of the functions
is `𝒞ⁿ` with compact support and the other function in locally integrable.
Versions of these statements for functions depending on a parameter are also given.
* `MeasureTheory.convolution_tendsto_right`: Given a sequence of nonnegative normalized functions
whose support tends to a small neighborhood around `0`, the convolution tends to the right
argument. This is specialized to bump functions in `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
# Notation
The following notations are localized in the locale `Convolution`:
* `f ⋆[L, μ] g` for the convolution. Note: you have to use parentheses to apply the convolution
to an argument: `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x`.
* `f ⋆[L] g := f ⋆[L, volume] g`
* `f ⋆ g := f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ] g`
# To do
* Existence and (uniform) continuity of the convolution if
one of the maps is in `ℒ^p` and the other in `ℒ^q` with `1 / p + 1 / q = 1`.
This might require a generalization of `MeasureTheory.MemLp.smul` where `smul` is generalized
to a continuous bilinear map.
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255K)
* The convolution is an `AEStronglyMeasurable` function
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255I).
* Prove properties about the convolution if both functions are rapidly decreasing.
* Use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (this likely requires changes in `to_additive`)
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open Bornology ContinuousLinearMap Metric Topology
open scoped Pointwise NNReal Filter
universe u𝕜 uG uE uE' uE'' uF uF' uF'' uP
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} {G : Type uG} {E : Type uE} {E' : Type uE'} {E'' : Type uE''} {F : Type uF}
{F' : Type uF'} {F'' : Type uF''} {P : Type uP}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedAddCommGroup E'']
[NormedAddCommGroup F] {f f' : G → E} {g g' : G → E'} {x x' : G} {y y' : E}
namespace MeasureTheory
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section NoMeasurability
variable [AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
theorem convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset {C : ℝ} (hC : ∀ i, ‖g i‖ ≤ C) {x t : G}
{s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * C) t := by
-- Porting note: had to add `f := _`
refine le_indicator (f := fun t ↦ ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖) (fun t _ => ?_) (fun t ht => ?_) t
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
· have : x - t ∉ support g := by
refine mt (fun hxt => hu ?_) ht
refine ⟨_, Set.neg_mem_neg.mpr (subset_closure hxt), _, hx, ?_⟩
simp only [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
simp only [nmem_support.mp this, (L _).map_zero, norm_zero, le_rfl]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hg : Continuous g)
{x t : G} {s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t := by
refine convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset _ (fun i => ?_) hx hu
exact le_ciSup (hg.norm.bddAbove_range_of_hasCompactSupport hcg.norm) _
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hg : Continuous g) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ (-tsupport g + s).indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t :=
hcg.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset L hg hx Subset.rfl
theorem _root_.Continuous.convolution_integrand_fst [ContinuousSub G] (hg : Continuous g) (t : G) :
Continuous fun x => L (f t) (g (x - t)) :=
L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <| hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_left (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hf : Continuous f) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f (x - t)) (g t)‖ ≤
(-tsupport f + s).indicator (fun t => (‖L‖ * ⨆ i, ‖f i‖) * ‖g t‖) t := by
convert hcf.convolution_integrand_bound_right L.flip hf hx using 1
simp_rw [L.opNorm_flip, mul_right_comm]
end NoMeasurability
section Measurability
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists at `x` when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is
integrable. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExistsAt [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (x : G) (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is integrable
for all `x : G`. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExists [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : G, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ
section ConvolutionExists
variable {L} in
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable [Sub G] {x : G} (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
h
section Group
variable [AddGroup G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand' [MeasurableAdd₂ G]
[MeasurableNeg G] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun p : G × G => p.1 - p.2) (μ.prod ν)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd <| hg.comp_measurable measurable_sub
section
variable [MeasurableAdd G] [MeasurableNeg G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd'
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {x : G}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf <| hg.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd' {x : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ (hf.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x) hg
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that `f` is integrable on a set `s` and `g` is bounded and ae strongly measurable
on `x₀ - s` (note that both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) (μ.restrict s)) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
rw [ConvolutionExistsAt]
rw [← integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset h2s]
set s' := (fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s
have : ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ.restrict s,
‖L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))‖ ≤ s.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i : s', ‖g i‖) t := by
filter_upwards
refine le_indicator (fun t ht => ?_) fun t ht => ?_
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
refine (le_ciSup_set hbg <| mem_preimage.mpr ?_)
rwa [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· have : t ∉ support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) := mt (fun h => h2s h) ht
rw [nmem_support.mp this, norm_zero]
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ ?_ this
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hs]; exact ((hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _).integrableOn
· exact hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm' {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine (h.const_mul ‖L‖).mono'
(hmf.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg) (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [mul_apply', ← mul_assoc]
apply L.le_opNorm₂
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm' := ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm'
end
section Left
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
hf.convolution_integrand_snd' L <|
hg.mono_ac <| (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).absolutelyContinuous
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
(hf.mono_ac
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ
x).absolutelyContinuous).convolution_integrand_swap_snd'
L hg
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ :=
h.of_norm' L hmf <|
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm := ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm
end Left
section Right
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ] [SFinite ν]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.convolution_integrand' L <|
hg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_of_right_invariant μ ν).absolutelyContinuous
theorem Integrable.convolution_integrand (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) := by
have h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
have h2_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y : G => ∫ x : G, ‖L (f y) (g (x - y))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
simp_rw [integrable_prod_iff' h_meas]
refine ⟨Eventually.of_forall fun t => (L (f t)).integrable_comp (hg.comp_sub_right t), ?_⟩
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ h2_meas
(Eventually.of_forall fun t => (?_ : _ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ∫ x, ‖g (x - t)‖ ∂μ))
· simp only [integral_sub_right_eq_self (‖g ·‖)]
exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· simp_rw [← integral_const_mul]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
exact integral_mono_of_nonneg (Eventually.of_forall fun t => norm_nonneg _)
((hg.comp_sub_right t).norm.const_mul _) (Eventually.of_forall fun t => L.le_opNorm₂ _ _)
theorem Integrable.ae_convolution_exists (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L ν :=
((integrable_prod_iff <|
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable).mp <|
hf.convolution_integrand L hg).1
end Right
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt {x₀ : G}
(h : HasCompactSupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
let u := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addRight x₀)
let v := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addLeft x₀)
apply ((u.isCompact_preimage.mpr h).bddAbove_image hg.norm.continuousOn).convolutionExistsAt' L
isClosed_closure.measurableSet subset_closure (hf.integrableOn_isCompact h)
have A : AEStronglyMeasurable (g ∘ v)
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t : G => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)))) := by
apply (hg.comp v.continuous).continuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact h
exact (isClosed_tsupport _).measurableSet
convert ((v.continuous.measurable.measurePreserving
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))))).aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff
v.measurableEmbedding).1 A
ext x
simp only [v, Homeomorph.neg, sub_eq_add_neg, val_toAddUnits_apply, Homeomorph.trans_apply,
Equiv.neg_apply, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Homeomorph.coe_addLeft]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine (hcg.comp_homeomorph (Homeomorph.subLeft x₀)).mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : g (x₀ - t) = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, (L _).map_zero]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine hcf.mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
section MeasurableGroup
variable [MeasurableNeg G] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ]
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that the integrand has compact support and `g` is bounded on this support (note that
both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). We also require that `f` is
integrable on the support of the integrand, and that both functions are strongly measurable.
This is a variant of `BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt'` in an abelian group with a left-invariant
measure. This allows us to state the boundedness and measurability of `g` in a more natural way. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [SFinite μ] {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => x₀ - t) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' L ?_ hs h2s hf ?_
· simp_rw [← sub_eq_neg_add, hbg]
· have : AEStronglyMeasurable g (map (fun t : G => x₀ - t) μ) :=
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
apply this.mono_measure
exact map_mono restrict_le_self (measurable_const.sub measurable_id')
variable {L} [MeasurableAdd G] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem convolutionExistsAt_flip :
ConvolutionExistsAt g f x L.flip μ ↔ ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ := by
simp_rw [ConvolutionExistsAt, ← integrable_comp_sub_left (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) x,
sub_sub_cancel, flip_apply]
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable_swap (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ := by
convert h.comp_sub_left x
simp_rw [sub_sub_self]
theorem convolutionExistsAt_iff_integrable_swap :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ ↔ Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
convolutionExistsAt_flip.symm
end MeasurableGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcf.convolutionExists_right L.flip hg hf x₀
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsLeft := HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right_of_continuous_left
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcg.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right L.flip hg hf x₀
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsRightOfContinuousLeft :=
HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right_of_continuous_left
end CommGroup
end ConvolutionExists
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The convolution of two functions `f` and `g` with respect to a continuous bilinear map `L` and
measure `μ`. It is defined to be `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ`. -/
noncomputable def convolution [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : G → F := fun x =>
∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and a measure `μ`. -/
scoped[Convolution] notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 ", " μ:67 "] " g:66 => convolution f g L μ
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and the volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 "]" g:66 => convolution f g L MeasureSpace.volume
/-- The convolution of two real-valued functions with respect to volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆ " g:66 =>
convolution f g (ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ) MeasureSpace.volume
open scoped Convolution
theorem convolution_def [Sub G] : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ :=
rfl
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication.
Note: it often helps the elaborator to give the type of the convolution explicitly. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul [Sub G] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f t • g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul [Sub G] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f t * g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
section Group
variable {L} [AddGroup G]
theorem smul_convolution [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : y • f ⋆[L, μ] g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, L.map_smul₂]
theorem convolution_smul [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : f ⋆[L, μ] y • g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, (L _).map_smul]
@[simp]
theorem zero_convolution : 0 ⋆[L, μ] g = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, L.map_zero₂, integral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem convolution_zero : f ⋆[L, μ] 0 = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, (L _).map_zero, integral_zero]
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x L μ) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g')) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f ⋆[L, μ] g') x := by
simp only [convolution_def, (L _).map_add, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
theorem ConvolutionExists.distrib_add (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f g' L μ) : f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g') = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).distrib_add (hfg' x)
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.add_distrib {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f' g x L μ) :
((f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f' ⋆[L, μ] g) x := by
simp only [convolution_def, L.map_add₂, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
theorem ConvolutionExists.add_distrib (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f' g L μ) : (f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f' ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).add_distrib (hfg' x)
theorem convolution_mono_right {f g g' : G → ℝ} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x) :
(f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
apply integral_mono hfg hfg'
simp only [lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
intro t
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg _) (hf _)
theorem convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg {f g g' : G → ℝ}
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x)
(hg' : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g' x) : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
by_cases H : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ
· exact convolution_mono_right H hfg' hf hg
have : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x = 0 := integral_undef H
rw [this]
exact integral_nonneg fun y => mul_nonneg (hf y) (hg' (x - y))
variable (L)
theorem convolution_congr [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ]
[IsAddRightInvariant μ] (h1 : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (h2 : g =ᵐ[μ] g') : f ⋆[L, μ] g = f' ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
apply integral_congr_ae
exact (h1.prodMk <| h2.comp_tendsto
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).tendsto_ae).fun_comp ↿fun x y ↦ L x y
theorem support_convolution_subset_swap : support (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ⊆ support g + support f := by
intro x h2x
by_contra hx
apply h2x
simp_rw [Set.mem_add, ← exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and_or, nmem_support] at hx
rw [convolution_def]
convert integral_zero G F using 2
ext t
rcases hx (x - t) t with (h | h | h)
· rw [h, (L _).map_zero]
· rw [h, L.map_zero₂]
· exact (h <| sub_add_cancel x t).elim
section
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem Integrable.integrable_convolution (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⋆[L, μ] g) μ :=
(hf.convolution_integrand L hg).integral_prod_left
end
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution [T2Space G] (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) : HasCompactSupport (f ⋆[L, μ] g) :=
(hcg.isCompact.add hcf).of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure <|
closure_minimal
((support_convolution_subset_swap L).trans <| add_subset_add subset_closure subset_closure)
(hcg.isCompact.add hcf).isClosed
variable [BorelSpace G] [TopologicalSpace P]
/-- The convolution `f * g` is continuous if `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous and
compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in a subset `s` of
a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`). -/
theorem continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param {g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G}
(hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContinuousOn (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) :
ContinuousOn (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
/- First get rid of the case where the space is not locally compact. Then `g` vanishes everywhere
and the conclusion is trivial. -/
by_cases H : ∀ p ∈ s, ∀ x, g p x = 0
· apply (continuousOn_const (c := 0)).congr
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae (Eventually.of_forall (fun y ↦ ?_))
simp [H p hp _]
have : LocallyCompactSpace G := by
push_neg at H
rcases H with ⟨p, hp, x, hx⟩
have A : support (g p) ⊆ k := support_subset_iff'.2 (fun y hy ↦ hgs p y hp hy)
have B : Continuous (g p) := by
refine hg.comp_continuous (.prodMk_right _) fun x => ?_
simpa only [prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_true] using hp
rcases eq_zero_or_locallyCompactSpace_of_support_subset_isCompact_of_addGroup hk A B with H|H
· simp [H] at hx
· exact H
/- Since `G` is locally compact, one may thicken `k` a little bit into a larger compact set
`(-k) + t`, outside of which all functions that appear in the convolution vanish. Then we can
apply a continuity statement for integrals depending on a parameter, with respect to
locally integrable functions and compactly supported continuous functions. -/
rintro ⟨q₀, x₀⟩ ⟨hq₀, -⟩
obtain ⟨t, t_comp, ht⟩ : ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x₀
let k' : Set G := (-k) +ᵥ t
have k'_comp : IsCompact k' := IsCompact.vadd_set hk.neg t_comp
let g' : (P × G) → G → E' := fun p x ↦ g p.1 (p.2 - x)
let s' : Set (P × G) := s ×ˢ t
have A : ContinuousOn g'.uncurry (s' ×ˢ univ) := by
have : g'.uncurry = g.uncurry ∘ (fun w ↦ (w.1.1, w.1.2 - w.2)) := by ext y; rfl
rw [this]
refine hg.comp (by fun_prop) ?_
simp +contextual [s', MapsTo]
have B : ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ ∫ x, L (f x) (g' a x) ∂μ) s' := by
apply continuousOn_integral_bilinear_of_locally_integrable_of_compact_support L k'_comp A _
(hf.integrableOn_isCompact k'_comp)
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ y ⟨hp, hx⟩ hy
apply hgs p _ hp
contrapose! hy
exact ⟨y - x, by simpa using hy, x, hx, by simp⟩
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (B (q₀, x₀) ⟨hq₀, mem_of_mem_nhds ht⟩)
exact mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, t, nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht, Subset.rfl⟩
/-- The convolution `f * g` is continuous if `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous and
compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of
a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`),
given in terms of compositions with an additional continuous map. -/
theorem continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp {s : Set P} {v : P → G}
(hv : ContinuousOn v s) {g : P → G → E'} {k : Set G} (hk : IsCompact k)
(hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f ⋆[L, μ] g x) (v x)) s := by
apply
(continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param L hk hgs hf hg).comp (continuousOn_id.prodMk hv)
intro x hx
simp only [hx, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_self_iff, _root_.id]
/-- The convolution is continuous if one function is locally integrable and the other has compact
support and is continuous. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
let g' : G → G → E' := fun _ q => g q
have : ContinuousOn (↿g') (univ ×ˢ univ) := (hg.comp continuous_snd).continuousOn
exact continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp L
(continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.1 continuous_id) hcg
(fun p x _ hx => image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx) hf this
/-- The convolution is continuous if one function is integrable and the other is bounded and
continuous. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable
[FirstCountableTopology G] [SecondCountableTopologyEither G E']
(hbg : BddAbove (range fun x => ‖g x‖)) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x₀ => ?_
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ, ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖ := by
filter_upwards with x; filter_upwards with t
apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl, le_ciSup hbg (x - t)]
refine continuousAt_of_dominated ?_ this ?_ ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun x =>
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun t => (L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <|
hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const).continuousAt
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
theorem support_convolution_subset : support (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ⊆ support f + support g :=
(support_convolution_subset_swap L).trans (add_comm _ _).subset
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableNeg G]
variable [MeasurableAdd G]
/-- Commutativity of convolution -/
theorem convolution_flip : g ⋆[L.flip, μ] f = f ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [convolution_def]
rw [← integral_sub_left_eq_self _ μ x]
simp_rw [sub_sub_self, flip_apply]
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution. -/
theorem convolution_eq_swap : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f (x - t)) (g t) ∂μ := by
rw [← convolution_flip]; rfl
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul_swap {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f (x - t) • g t ∂μ :=
convolution_eq_swap _
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul_swap [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f (x - t) * g t ∂μ :=
convolution_eq_swap _
/-- The convolution of two even functions is also even. -/
theorem convolution_neg_of_neg_eq (h1 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f (-x) = f x) (h2 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g (-x) = g x) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] g) (-x) = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x :=
calc
∫ t : G, (L (f t)) (g (-x - t)) ∂μ = ∫ t : G, (L (f (-t))) (g (x + t)) ∂μ := by
apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h1, (eventually_add_left_iff μ x).2 h2] with t ht h't
simp_rw [ht, ← h't, neg_add']
_ = ∫ t : G, (L (f t)) (g (x - t)) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_neg_eq_self]
simp only [neg_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
end Measurable
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G]
variable [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_left
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.continuous_convolution_right L.flip hg hf
theorem _root_.BddAbove.continuous_convolution_left_of_integrable
[FirstCountableTopology G] [SecondCountableTopologyEither G E]
(hbf : BddAbove (range fun x => ‖f x‖)) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hbf.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable L.flip hg hf
end CommGroup
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup G]
/-- Compute `(f ⋆ g) x₀` if the support of the `f` is within `Metric.ball 0 R`, and `g` is constant
on `Metric.ball x₀ R`.
We can simplify the RHS further if we assume `f` is integrable, but also if `L = (•)` or more
generally if `L` has an `AntilipschitzWith`-condition. -/
theorem convolution_eq_right' {x₀ : G} {R : ℝ} (hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, g x = g x₀) : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x₀ = ∫ t, L (f t) (g x₀) ∂μ := by
have h2 : ∀ t, L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) = L (f t) (g x₀) := fun t ↦ by
by_cases ht : t ∈ support f
· have h2t := hf ht
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at h2t
specialize hg (x₀ - t)
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hg
rw [hg h2t]
· rw [nmem_support] at ht
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
simp_rw [convolution_def, h2]
variable [BorelSpace G] [SecondCountableTopology G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [SFinite μ]
/-- Approximate `(f ⋆ g) x₀` if the support of the `f` is bounded within a ball, and `g` is near
`g x₀` on a ball with the same radius around `x₀`. See `dist_convolution_le` for a special case.
We can simplify the second argument of `dist` further if we add some extra type-classes on `E`
and `𝕜` or if `L` is scalar multiplication. -/
theorem dist_convolution_le' {x₀ : G} {R ε : ℝ} {z₀ : E'} (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (hif : Integrable f μ)
(hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, dist (g x) z₀ ≤ ε) :
dist ((f ⋆[L, μ] g : G → F) x₀) (∫ t, L (f t) z₀ ∂μ) ≤ (‖L‖ * ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) * ε := by
have hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet (Subset.trans ?_ hf)
hif.integrableOn hmg
swap; · refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_; simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
rw [bddAbove_def]
refine ⟨‖z₀‖ + ε, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
refine norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le (hg x ?_)
rwa [mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_sub_rev, ← mem_ball_zero_iff]
have h2 : ∀ t, dist (L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (L (f t) z₀) ≤ ‖L (f t)‖ * ε := by
intro t; by_cases ht : t ∈ support f
· have h2t := hf ht
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at h2t
specialize hg (x₀ - t)
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hg
refine ((L (f t)).dist_le_opNorm _ _).trans ?_
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg h2t) (norm_nonneg _)
· rw [nmem_support] at ht
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂, L.map_zero, norm_zero, zero_mul, dist_self]
rfl
simp_rw [convolution_def]
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm] at h2 ⊢
rw [← integral_sub hfg.integrable]; swap; · exact (L.flip z₀).integrable_comp hif
refine (norm_integral_le_of_norm_le ((L.integrable_comp hif).norm.mul_const ε)
(Eventually.of_forall h2)).trans ?_
rw [integral_mul_const]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ hε
have h3 : ∀ t, ‖L (f t)‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ := by
intro t
exact L.le_opNorm (f t)
refine (integral_mono (L.integrable_comp hif).norm (hif.norm.const_mul _) h3).trans_eq ?_
rw [integral_const_mul]
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [CompleteSpace E']
/-- Approximate `f ⋆ g` if the support of the `f` is bounded within a ball, and `g` is near `g x₀`
on a ball with the same radius around `x₀`.
This is a special case of `dist_convolution_le'` where `L` is `(•)`, `f` has integral 1 and `f` is
nonnegative. -/
theorem dist_convolution_le {f : G → ℝ} {x₀ : G} {R ε : ℝ} {z₀ : E'} (hε : 0 ≤ ε)
(hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R) (hnf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hintf : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, dist (g x) z₀ ≤ ε) :
dist ((f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g : G → E') x₀) z₀ ≤ ε := by
have hif : Integrable f μ := integrable_of_integral_eq_one hintf
convert (dist_convolution_le' (lsmul ℝ ℝ) hε hif hf hmg hg).trans _
· simp_rw [lsmul_apply, integral_smul_const, hintf, one_smul]
· simp_rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (hnf _), hintf, mul_one]
exact (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right opNorm_lsmul_le hε).trans_eq (one_mul ε)
/-- `(φ i ⋆ g i) (k i)` tends to `z₀` as `i` tends to some filter `l` if
* `φ` is a sequence of nonnegative functions with integral `1` as `i` tends to `l`;
* The support of `φ` tends to small neighborhoods around `(0 : G)` as `i` tends to `l`;
* `g i` is `mu`-a.e. strongly measurable as `i` tends to `l`;
* `g i x` tends to `z₀` as `(i, x)` tends to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀`;
* `k i` tends to `x₀`.
See also `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
-/
theorem convolution_tendsto_right {ι} {g : ι → G → E'} {l : Filter ι} {x₀ : G} {z₀ : E'}
{φ : ι → G → ℝ} {k : ι → G} (hnφ : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x, 0 ≤ φ i x)
(hiφ : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫ x, φ i x ∂μ = 1)
-- todo: we could weaken this to "the integral tends to 1"
(hφ : Tendsto (fun n => support (φ n)) l (𝓝 0).smallSets)
(hmg : ∀ᶠ i in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) (hcg : Tendsto (uncurry g) (l ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 z₀))
(hk : Tendsto k l (𝓝 x₀)) :
Tendsto (fun i : ι => (φ i ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g i : G → E') (k i)) l (𝓝 z₀) := by
simp_rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff] at hφ
rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds] at hcg ⊢
simp_rw [Metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff] at hcg
intro ε hε
have h2ε : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
obtain ⟨p, hp, δ, hδ, hgδ⟩ := hcg _ h2ε
dsimp only [uncurry] at hgδ
have h2k := hk.eventually (ball_mem_nhds x₀ <| half_pos hδ)
have h2φ := hφ (ball (0 : G) _) <| ball_mem_nhds _ (half_pos hδ)
filter_upwards [hp, h2k, h2φ, hnφ, hiφ, hmg] with i hpi hki hφi hnφi hiφi hmgi
have hgi : dist (g i (k i)) z₀ < ε / 3 := hgδ hpi (hki.trans <| half_lt_self hδ)
have h1 : ∀ x' ∈ ball (k i) (δ / 2), dist (g i x') (g i (k i)) ≤ ε / 3 + ε / 3 := by
intro x' hx'
refine (dist_triangle_right _ _ _).trans (add_le_add (hgδ hpi ?_).le hgi.le)
exact ((dist_triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hx'.out hki)).trans_eq (add_halves δ)
have := dist_convolution_le (add_pos h2ε h2ε).le hφi hnφi hiφi hmgi h1
refine ((dist_triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt this hgi)).trans_eq ?_
field_simp; ring_nf
end NormedAddCommGroup
end Measurability
end NontriviallyNormedField
open scoped Convolution
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {n : ℕ∞}
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section Assoc
variable [CompleteSpace F]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace F']
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedSpace ℝ F''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F''] [CompleteSpace F'']
variable {k : G → E''}
variable (L₂ : F →L[𝕜] E'' →L[𝕜] F')
variable (L₃ : E →L[𝕜] F'' →L[𝕜] F')
variable (L₄ : E' →L[𝕜] E'' →L[𝕜] F'')
variable [AddGroup G]
variable [SFinite μ] [SFinite ν] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem integral_convolution [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E'] [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace E'] (hf : Integrable f ν)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : ∫ x, (f ⋆[L, ν] g) x ∂μ = L (∫ x, f x ∂ν) (∫ x, g x ∂μ) := by
refine (integral_integral_swap (by apply hf.convolution_integrand L hg)).trans ?_
simp_rw [integral_comp_comm _ (hg.comp_sub_right _), integral_sub_right_eq_self]
exact (L.flip (∫ x, g x ∂μ)).integral_comp_comm hf
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [IsAddRightInvariant ν] [MeasurableNeg G]
/-- Convolution is associative. This has a weak but inconvenient integrability condition.
See also `MeasureTheory.convolution_assoc`. -/
theorem convolution_assoc' (hL : ∀ (x : E) (y : E') (z : E''), L₂ (L x y) z = L₃ x (L₄ y z))
{x₀ : G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g y L ν)
(hgk : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, ConvolutionExistsAt g k x L₄ μ)
(hi : Integrable (uncurry fun x y => (L₃ (f y)) ((L₄ (g (x - y))) (k (x₀ - x)))) (μ.prod ν)) :
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ :=
calc
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = ∫ t, L₂ (∫ s, L (f s) (g (t - s)) ∂ν) (k (x₀ - t)) ∂μ := rfl
_ = ∫ t, ∫ s, L₂ (L (f s) (g (t - s))) (k (x₀ - t)) ∂ν ∂μ :=
(integral_congr_ae (hfg.mono fun t ht => ((L₂.flip (k (x₀ - t))).integral_comp_comm ht).symm))
_ = ∫ t, ∫ s, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g (t - s)) (k (x₀ - t))) ∂ν ∂μ := by simp_rw [hL]
_ = ∫ s, ∫ t, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g (t - s)) (k (x₀ - t))) ∂μ ∂ν := by rw [integral_integral_swap hi]
_ = ∫ s, ∫ u, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g u) (k (x₀ - s - u))) ∂μ ∂ν := by
congr; ext t
rw [eq_comm, ← integral_sub_right_eq_self _ t]
simp_rw [sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
_ = ∫ s, L₃ (f s) (∫ u, L₄ (g u) (k (x₀ - s - u)) ∂μ) ∂ν := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
refine ((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht => ?_
exact (L₃ (f t)).integral_comp_comm ht
_ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ := rfl
/-- Convolution is associative. This requires that
* all maps are a.e. strongly measurable w.r.t one of the measures
* `f ⋆[L, ν] g` exists almost everywhere
* `‖g‖ ⋆[μ] ‖k‖` exists almost everywhere
* `‖f‖ ⋆[ν] (‖g‖ ⋆[μ] ‖k‖)` exists at `x₀` -/
theorem convolution_assoc (hL : ∀ (x : E) (y : E') (z : E''), L₂ (L x y) z = L₃ x (L₄ y z)) {x₀ : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hk : AEStronglyMeasurable k μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g y L ν)
(hgk : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖g x‖) (fun x => ‖k x‖) x (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfgk :
ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) ((fun x => ‖g x‖) ⋆[mul ℝ ℝ, μ] fun x => ‖k x‖) x₀
(mul ℝ ℝ) ν) :
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ := by
refine convolution_assoc' L L₂ L₃ L₄ hL hfg (hgk.mono fun x hx => hx.of_norm L₄ hg hk) ?_
-- the following is similar to `Integrable.convolution_integrand`
have h_meas :
AEStronglyMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x))))
(μ.prod ν) := by
refine L₃.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd ?_
refine L₄.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hg.fst ?_
refine (hk.mono_ac ?_).comp_measurable
((measurable_const.sub measurable_snd).sub measurable_fst)
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.absolutelyContinuous ?_
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_left
((measurable_const.sub measurable_snd).sub measurable_fst) (Eventually.of_forall fun y => ?_)
dsimp only
exact quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ _
have h2_meas :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y => ∫ x, ‖L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x)))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
have h3 : map (fun z : G × G => (z.1 - z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν :=
(measurePreserving_sub_prod μ ν).map_eq
suffices Integrable (uncurry fun x y => L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x)))) (μ.prod ν) by
rw [← h3] at this
convert this.comp_measurable (measurable_sub.prodMk measurable_snd)
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [uncurry, Function.comp_apply,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
simp_rw [integrable_prod_iff' h_meas]
refine ⟨((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht =>
(L₃ (f t)).integrable_comp <| ht.of_norm L₄ hg hk, ?_⟩
refine (hfgk.const_mul (‖L₃‖ * ‖L₄‖)).mono' h2_meas
(((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht => ?_)
simp_rw [convolution_def, mul_apply', mul_mul_mul_comm ‖L₃‖ ‖L₄‖, ← integral_const_mul]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
refine integral_mono_of_nonneg (Eventually.of_forall fun t => norm_nonneg _)
((ht.const_mul _).const_mul _) (Eventually.of_forall fun s => ?_)
simp only [← mul_assoc ‖L₄‖]
apply_rules [ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
end Assoc
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem convolution_precompR_apply {g : G → E'' →L[𝕜] E'} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hg : Continuous g) (x₀ : G) (x : E'') :
(f ⋆[L.precompR E'', μ] g) x₀ x = (f ⋆[L, μ] fun a => g a x) x₀ := by
have := hcg.convolutionExists_right (L.precompR E'' :) hf hg x₀
simp_rw [convolution_def, ContinuousLinearMap.integral_apply this]
rfl
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ]
/-- Compute the total derivative of `f ⋆ g` if `g` is `C^1` with compact support and `f` is locally
integrable. To write down the total derivative as a convolution, we use
`ContinuousLinearMap.precompR`. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 1 g) (x₀ : G) :
HasFDerivAt (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ((f ⋆[L.precompR G, μ] fderiv 𝕜 g) x₀) x₀ := by
rcases hcg.eq_zero_or_finiteDimensional 𝕜 hg.continuous with (rfl | fin_dim)
· have : fderiv 𝕜 (0 : G → E') = 0 := fderiv_const (0 : E')
simp only [this, convolution_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
exact hasFDerivAt_const (0 : F) x₀
have : ProperSpace G := FiniteDimensional.proper_rclike 𝕜 G
set L' := L.precompR G
have h1 : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
Eventually.of_forall
(hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd L hg.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable)
have h2 : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L' (f t) (fderiv 𝕜 g (x - t))) μ :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd L'
(hg.continuous_fderiv le_rfl).aestronglyMeasurable
have h3 : ∀ x t, HasFDerivAt (fun x => g (x - t)) (fderiv 𝕜 g (x - t)) x := fun x t ↦ by
simpa using
(hg.differentiable le_rfl).differentiableAt.hasFDerivAt.comp x
((hasFDerivAt_id x).sub (hasFDerivAt_const t x))
let K' := -tsupport (fderiv 𝕜 g) + closedBall x₀ 1
have hK' : IsCompact K' := (hcg.fderiv 𝕜).neg.add (isCompact_closedBall x₀ 1)
apply hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le zero_lt_one h1 _ (h2 x₀)
· filter_upwards with t x hx using
(hcg.fderiv 𝕜).convolution_integrand_bound_right L' (hg.continuous_fderiv le_rfl)
(ball_subset_closedBall hx)
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hK'.measurableSet]
exact ((hf.integrableOn_isCompact hK').norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun t x _ => (L _).hasFDerivAt.comp x (h3 x t)
· exact hcg.convolutionExists_right L hf hg.continuous x₀
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left [IsNegInvariant μ]
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 1 f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) (x₀ : G) :
HasFDerivAt (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ((fderiv 𝕜 f ⋆[L.precompL G, μ] g) x₀) x₀ := by
simp +singlePass only [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right L.flip hg hf x₀
end RCLike
section Real
/-! The one-variable case -/
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f₀ : 𝕜 → E} {g₀ : 𝕜 → E'}
variable {n : ℕ∞}
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
variable {μ : Measure 𝕜}
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [SFinite μ]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasDerivAt_convolution_right (hf : LocallyIntegrable f₀ μ)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g₀) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 1 g₀) (x₀ : 𝕜) :
HasDerivAt (f₀ ⋆[L, μ] g₀) ((f₀ ⋆[L, μ] deriv g₀) x₀) x₀ := by
convert (hcg.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right L hf hg x₀).hasDerivAt using 1
rw [convolution_precompR_apply L hf (hcg.fderiv 𝕜) (hg.continuous_fderiv le_rfl)]
rfl
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.hasDerivAt_convolution_left [IsNegInvariant μ]
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f₀) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 1 f₀) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g₀ μ) (x₀ : 𝕜) :
HasDerivAt (f₀ ⋆[L, μ] g₀) ((deriv f₀ ⋆[L, μ] g₀) x₀) x₀ := by
simp +singlePass only [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.hasDerivAt_convolution_right L.flip hg hf x₀
end Real
section WithParam
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [MeasurableSpace G] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [NormedAddCommGroup P] [NormedSpace 𝕜 P] {μ : Measure G}
(L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
/-- The derivative of the convolution `f * g` is given by `f * Dg`, when `f` is locally integrable
and `g` is `C^1` and compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an
open subset `s` of a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the
parameter in `s`). -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_convolution_right_with_param {g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G}
(hs : IsOpen s) (hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 1 (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) (q₀ : P × G)
(hq₀ : q₀.1 ∈ s) :
HasFDerivAt (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2)
((f ⋆[L.precompR (P × G), μ] fun x : G => fderiv 𝕜 (↿g) (q₀.1, x)) q₀.2) q₀ := by
let g' := fderiv 𝕜 ↿g
have A : ∀ p ∈ s, Continuous (g p) := fun p hp ↦ by
refine hg.continuousOn.comp_continuous (.prodMk_right _) fun x => ?_
simpa only [prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_true] using hp
have A' : ∀ q : P × G, q.1 ∈ s → s ×ˢ univ ∈ 𝓝 q := fun q hq ↦ by
apply (hs.prod isOpen_univ).mem_nhds
simpa only [mem_prod, mem_univ, and_true] using hq
-- The derivative of `g` vanishes away from `k`.
have g'_zero : ∀ p x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g' (p, x) = 0 := by
intro p x hp hx
refine (hasFDerivAt_zero_of_eventually_const 0 ?_).fderiv
have M2 : kᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x := hk.isClosed.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hx
have M1 : s ∈ 𝓝 p := hs.mem_nhds hp
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
filter_upwards [prod_mem_prod M1 M2]
rintro ⟨p, y⟩ ⟨hp, hy⟩
exact hgs p y hp hy
/- We find a small neighborhood of `{q₀.1} × k` on which the derivative is uniformly bounded. This
follows from the continuity at all points of the compact set `k`. -/
obtain ⟨ε, C, εpos, h₀ε, hε⟩ :
∃ ε C, 0 < ε ∧ ball q₀.1 ε ⊆ s ∧ ∀ p x, ‖p - q₀.1‖ < ε → ‖g' (p, x)‖ ≤ C := by
have A : IsCompact ({q₀.1} ×ˢ k) := isCompact_singleton.prod hk
obtain ⟨t, kt, t_open, ht⟩ : ∃ t, {q₀.1} ×ˢ k ⊆ t ∧ IsOpen t ∧ IsBounded (g' '' t) := by
have B : ContinuousOn g' (s ×ˢ univ) :=
hg.continuousOn_fderiv_of_isOpen (hs.prod isOpen_univ) le_rfl
apply exists_isOpen_isBounded_image_of_isCompact_of_continuousOn A (hs.prod isOpen_univ) _ B
simp only [prod_subset_prod_iff, hq₀, singleton_subset_iff, subset_univ, and_self_iff,
true_or]
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε, h'ε⟩ :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ thickening ε ({q₀.fst} ×ˢ k) ⊆ t ∧ ball q₀.1 ε ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ thickening ε (({q₀.fst} : Set P) ×ˢ k) ⊆ t :=
A.exists_thickening_subset_open t_open kt
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ ball q₀.1 δ ⊆ s := Metric.isOpen_iff.1 hs _ hq₀
refine ⟨min ε δ, lt_min εpos δpos, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact Subset.trans (thickening_mono (min_le_left _ _) _) hε
· exact Subset.trans (ball_subset_ball (min_le_right _ _)) hδ
obtain ⟨C, Cpos, hC⟩ : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ g' '' t ⊆ closedBall 0 C := ht.subset_closedBall_lt 0 0
refine ⟨ε, C, εpos, h'ε, fun p x hp => ?_⟩
have hps : p ∈ s := h'ε (mem_ball_iff_norm.2 hp)
by_cases hx : x ∈ k
· have H : (p, x) ∈ t := by
apply hε
refine mem_thickening_iff.2 ⟨(q₀.1, x), ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [hx, singleton_prod, mem_image, Prod.mk_inj, eq_self_iff_true, true_and,
exists_eq_right]
· rw [← dist_eq_norm] at hp
simpa only [Prod.dist_eq, εpos, dist_self, max_lt_iff, and_true] using hp
have : g' (p, x) ∈ closedBall (0 : P × G →L[𝕜] E') C := hC (mem_image_of_mem _ H)
rwa [mem_closedBall_zero_iff] at this
· have : g' (p, x) = 0 := g'_zero _ _ hps hx
rw [this]
simpa only [norm_zero] using Cpos.le
/- Now, we wish to apply a theorem on differentiation of integrals. For this, we need to check
trivial measurability or integrability assumptions (in `I1`, `I2`, `I3`), as well as a uniform
integrability assumption over the derivative (in `I4` and `I5`) and pointwise differentiability
in `I6`. -/
have I1 :
∀ᶠ x : P × G in 𝓝 q₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun a : G => L (f a) (g x.1 (x.2 - a))) μ := by
filter_upwards [A' q₀ hq₀]
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
refine (HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right L ?_ hf (A _ hp) _).1
apply hk.of_isClosed_subset (isClosed_tsupport _)
exact closure_minimal (support_subset_iff'.2 fun z hz => hgs _ _ hp hz) hk.isClosed
have I2 : Integrable (fun a : G => L (f a) (g q₀.1 (q₀.2 - a))) μ := by
have M : HasCompactSupport (g q₀.1) := HasCompactSupport.intro hk fun x hx => hgs q₀.1 x hq₀ hx
apply M.convolutionExists_right L hf (A q₀.1 hq₀) q₀.2
have I3 : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun a : G => (L (f a)).comp (g' (q₀.fst, q₀.snd - a))) μ := by
have T : HasCompactSupport fun y => g' (q₀.1, y) :=
HasCompactSupport.intro hk fun x hx => g'_zero q₀.1 x hq₀ hx
apply (HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right (L.precompR (P × G) :) T hf _ q₀.2).1
have : ContinuousOn g' (s ×ˢ univ) :=
hg.continuousOn_fderiv_of_isOpen (hs.prod isOpen_univ) le_rfl
apply this.comp_continuous (.prodMk_right _)
intro x
simpa only [prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_true] using hq₀
set K' := (-k + {q₀.2} : Set G) with K'_def
have hK' : IsCompact K' := hk.neg.add isCompact_singleton
obtain ⟨U, U_open, K'U, hU⟩ : ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ K' ⊆ U ∧ IntegrableOn f U μ :=
hf.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact hK'
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, δε, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ, (0 : ℝ) < δ ∧ δ ≤ ε ∧ K' + ball 0 δ ⊆ U := by
obtain ⟨V, V_mem, hV⟩ : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), K' + V ⊆ U :=
compact_open_separated_add_right hK' U_open K'U
rcases Metric.mem_nhds_iff.1 V_mem with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min δ ε, lt_min δpos εpos, min_le_right δ ε, ?_⟩
exact (add_subset_add_left ((ball_subset_ball (min_le_left _ _)).trans hδ)).trans hV
letI := ContinuousLinearMap.hasOpNorm (𝕜 := 𝕜) (𝕜₂ := 𝕜) (E := E)
(F := (P × G →L[𝕜] E') →L[𝕜] P × G →L[𝕜] F) (σ₁₂ := RingHom.id 𝕜)
let bound : G → ℝ := indicator U fun t => ‖(L.precompR (P × G))‖ * ‖f t‖ * C
have I4 : ∀ᵐ a : G ∂μ, ∀ x : P × G, dist x q₀ < δ →
‖L.precompR (P × G) (f a) (g' (x.fst, x.snd - a))‖ ≤ bound a := by
filter_upwards with a x hx
rw [Prod.dist_eq, dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm] at hx
have : (-tsupport fun a => g' (x.1, a)) + ball q₀.2 δ ⊆ U := by
apply Subset.trans _ hδ
rw [K'_def, add_assoc]
apply add_subset_add
· rw [neg_subset_neg]
refine closure_minimal (support_subset_iff'.2 fun z hz => ?_) hk.isClosed
apply g'_zero x.1 z (h₀ε _) hz
rw [mem_ball_iff_norm]
exact ((le_max_left _ _).trans_lt hx).trans_le δε
· simp only [add_ball, thickening_singleton, zero_vadd, subset_rfl]
apply convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset _ _ _ this
· intro y
exact hε _ _ (((le_max_left _ _).trans_lt hx).trans_le δε)
· rw [mem_ball_iff_norm]
exact (le_max_right _ _).trans_lt hx
have I5 : Integrable bound μ := by
rw [integrable_indicator_iff U_open.measurableSet]
exact (hU.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
have I6 : ∀ᵐ a : G ∂μ, ∀ x : P × G, dist x q₀ < δ →
HasFDerivAt (fun x : P × G => L (f a) (g x.1 (x.2 - a)))
((L (f a)).comp (g' (x.fst, x.snd - a))) x := by
filter_upwards with a x hx
apply (L _).hasFDerivAt.comp x
have N : s ×ˢ univ ∈ 𝓝 (x.1, x.2 - a) := by
apply A'
apply h₀ε
rw [Prod.dist_eq] at hx
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hx) δε
have Z := ((hg.differentiableOn le_rfl).differentiableAt N).hasFDerivAt
have Z' :
HasFDerivAt (fun x : P × G => (x.1, x.2 - a)) (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (P × G)) x := by
have : (fun x : P × G => (x.1, x.2 - a)) = _root_.id - fun x => (0, a) := by
ext x <;> simp only [Pi.sub_apply, _root_.id, Prod.fst_sub, sub_zero, Prod.snd_sub]
rw [this]
exact (hasFDerivAt_id x).sub_const (0, a)
exact Z.comp x Z'
exact hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le δpos I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6
/-- The convolution `f * g` is `C^n` when `f` is locally integrable and `g` is `C^n` and compactly
supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of a
parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`).
In this version, all the types belong to the same universe (to get an induction working in the
proof). Use instead `contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param`, which removes this restriction. -/
theorem contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param_aux {G : Type uP} {E' : Type uP} {F : Type uP}
{P : Type uP} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [MeasurableSpace G]
{μ : Measure G}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [BorelSpace G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [NormedAddCommGroup P] [NormedSpace 𝕜 P]
{f : G → E} {n : ℕ∞} (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F) {g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G}
(hs : IsOpen s) (hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
/- We have a formula for the derivation of `f * g`, which is of the same form, thanks to
`hasFDerivAt_convolution_right_with_param`. Therefore, we can prove the result by induction on
`n` (but for this we need the spaces at the different steps of the induction to live in the same
universe, which is why we make the assumption in the lemma that all the relevant spaces
come from the same universe). -/
induction n using ENat.nat_induction generalizing g E' F with
| h0 =>
rw [WithTop.coe_zero, contDiffOn_zero] at hg ⊢
exact continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param L hk hgs hf hg
| hsuc n ih =>
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, WithTop.coe_add,
WithTop.coe_natCast, WithTop.coe_one] at hg ⊢
let f' : P → G → P × G →L[𝕜] F := fun p a =>
(f ⋆[L.precompR (P × G), μ] fun x : G => fderiv 𝕜 (uncurry g) (p, x)) a
have A : ∀ q₀ : P × G, q₀.1 ∈ s →
HasFDerivAt (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2) (f' q₀.1 q₀.2) q₀ :=
hasFDerivAt_convolution_right_with_param L hs hk hgs hf hg.one_of_succ
rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_fderiv_of_isOpen (hs.prod (@isOpen_univ G _))] at hg ⊢
refine ⟨?_, by simp, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
exact (A (p, x) hp).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
· suffices H : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (↿f') (s ×ˢ univ) by
apply H.congr
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
exact (A (p, x) hp).fderiv
have B : ∀ (p : P) (x : G), p ∈ s → x ∉ k → fderiv 𝕜 (uncurry g) (p, x) = 0 := by
intro p x hp hx
apply (hasFDerivAt_zero_of_eventually_const (0 : E') _).fderiv
have M2 : kᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x := IsOpen.mem_nhds hk.isClosed.isOpen_compl hx
have M1 : s ∈ 𝓝 p := hs.mem_nhds hp
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
filter_upwards [prod_mem_prod M1 M2]
rintro ⟨p, y⟩ ⟨hp, hy⟩
exact hgs p y hp hy
apply ih (L.precompR (P × G) :) B
convert hg.2.2
| htop ih =>
rw [contDiffOn_infty] at hg ⊢
exact fun n ↦ ih n L hgs (hg n)
/-- The convolution `f * g` is `C^n` when `f` is locally integrable and `g` is `C^n` and compactly
supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of a
parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`). -/
theorem contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param {f : G → E} {n : ℕ∞} (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
{g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G} (hs : IsOpen s) (hk : IsCompact k)
(hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
/- The result is known when all the universes are the same, from
`contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param_aux`. We reduce to this situation by pushing
everything through `ULift` continuous linear equivalences. -/
let eG : Type max uG uE' uF uP := ULift.{max uE' uF uP} G
borelize eG
let eE' : Type max uE' uG uF uP := ULift.{max uG uF uP} E'
let eF : Type max uF uG uE' uP := ULift.{max uG uE' uP} F
let eP : Type max uP uG uE' uF := ULift.{max uG uE' uF} P
let isoG : eG ≃L[𝕜] G := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
let isoE' : eE' ≃L[𝕜] E' := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
let isoF : eF ≃L[𝕜] F := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
let isoP : eP ≃L[𝕜] P := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
let ef := f ∘ isoG
let eμ : Measure eG := Measure.map isoG.symm μ
let eg : eP → eG → eE' := fun ep ex => isoE'.symm (g (isoP ep) (isoG ex))
let eL :=
ContinuousLinearMap.comp
((ContinuousLinearEquiv.arrowCongr isoE' isoF).symm : (E' →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] eE' →L[𝕜] eF) L
let R := fun q : eP × eG => (ef ⋆[eL, eμ] eg q.1) q.2
have R_contdiff : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n R ((isoP ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ univ) := by
have hek : IsCompact (isoG ⁻¹' k) := isoG.toHomeomorph.isClosedEmbedding.isCompact_preimage hk
have hes : IsOpen (isoP ⁻¹' s) := isoP.continuous.isOpen_preimage _ hs
refine contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param_aux eL hes hek ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro p x hp hx
simp only [eg, (· ∘ ·), ContinuousLinearEquiv.prod_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_coe,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff]
exact hgs _ _ hp hx
· exact (locallyIntegrable_map_homeomorph isoG.symm.toHomeomorph).2 hf
· apply isoE'.symm.contDiff.comp_contDiffOn
apply hg.comp (isoP.prod isoG).contDiff.contDiffOn
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
simpa only [mem_preimage, ContinuousLinearEquiv.prod_apply, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ,
and_true] using hp
have A : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (isoF ∘ R ∘ (isoP.prod isoG).symm) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
apply isoF.contDiff.comp_contDiffOn
apply R_contdiff.comp (ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff _).contDiffOn
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
simpa only [mem_preimage, mem_prod, mem_univ, and_true, ContinuousLinearEquiv.prod_symm,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.prod_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using hp
have : isoF ∘ R ∘ (isoP.prod isoG).symm = fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2 := by
apply funext
rintro ⟨p, x⟩
simp only [LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_coe, (· ∘ ·), ContinuousLinearEquiv.prod_symm,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.prod_apply]
simp only [R, convolution, coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, (· ∘ ·)]
rw [IsClosedEmbedding.integral_map, ← isoF.integral_comp_comm]
· rfl
· exact isoG.symm.toHomeomorph.isClosedEmbedding
simp_rw [this] at A
exact A
/-- The convolution `f * g` is `C^n` when `f` is locally integrable and `g` is `C^n` and compactly
supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of a
parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`),
given in terms of composition with an additional `C^n` function. -/
theorem contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp {n : ℕ∞} (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F) {s : Set P}
{v : P → G} (hv : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n v s) {f : G → E} {g : P → G → E'} {k : Set G} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (f ⋆[L, μ] g x) (v x)) s := by
apply (contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param L hs hk hgs hf hg).comp (contDiffOn_id.prodMk hv)
intro x hx
simp only [hx, mem_preimage, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_self_iff, _root_.id]
/-- The convolution `g * f` is `C^n` when `f` is locally integrable and `g` is `C^n` and compactly
supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of a
parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`). -/
theorem contDiffOn_convolution_left_with_param [μ.IsAddLeftInvariant] [μ.IsNegInvariant]
(L : E' →L[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] F) {f : G → E} {n : ℕ∞} {g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G}
(hs : IsOpen s) (hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun q : P × G => (g q.1 ⋆[L, μ] f) q.2) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
simpa only [convolution_flip] using contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param L.flip hs hk hgs hf hg
/-- The convolution `g * f` is `C^n` when `f` is locally integrable and `g` is `C^n` and compactly
supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of a
parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`),
given in terms of composition with additional `C^n` functions. -/
theorem contDiffOn_convolution_left_with_param_comp [μ.IsAddLeftInvariant] [μ.IsNegInvariant]
(L : E' →L[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] F) {s : Set P} {n : ℕ∞} {v : P → G} (hv : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n v s) {f : G → E}
{g : P → G → E'} {k : Set G} (hs : IsOpen s) (hk : IsCompact k)
(hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x => (g x ⋆[L, μ] f) (v x)) s := by
apply (contDiffOn_convolution_left_with_param L hs hk hgs hf hg).comp (contDiffOn_id.prodMk hv)
intro x hx
simp only [hx, mem_preimage, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_self_iff, _root_.id]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_right {n : ℕ∞} (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) : ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rcases exists_compact_iff_hasCompactSupport.2 hcg with ⟨k, hk, h'k⟩
rw [← contDiffOn_univ]
exact contDiffOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp L contDiffOn_id isOpen_univ hk
(fun p x _ hx => h'k x hx) hf (hg.comp contDiff_snd).contDiffOn
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_left [μ.IsAddLeftInvariant] [μ.IsNegInvariant]
{n : ℕ∞} (hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.contDiff_convolution_right L.flip hg hf
end WithParam
section Nonneg
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The forward convolution of two functions `f` and `g` on `ℝ`, with respect to a continuous
bilinear map `L` and measure `ν`. It is defined to be the function mapping `x` to
`∫ t in 0..x, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂ν` if `0 < x`, and 0 otherwise. -/
noncomputable def posConvolution (f : ℝ → E) (g : ℝ → E') (L : E →L[ℝ] E' →L[ℝ] F)
(ν : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) : ℝ → F :=
indicator (Ioi (0 : ℝ)) fun x => ∫ t in (0)..x, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂ν
theorem posConvolution_eq_convolution_indicator (f : ℝ → E) (g : ℝ → E') (L : E →L[ℝ] E' →L[ℝ] F)
(ν : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) [NoAtoms ν] :
posConvolution f g L ν = convolution (indicator (Ioi 0) f) (indicator (Ioi 0) g) L ν := by
ext1 x
rw [convolution, posConvolution, indicator]
split_ifs with h
· rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (le_of_lt h), integral_Ioc_eq_integral_Ioo, ←
integral_indicator (measurableSet_Ioo : MeasurableSet (Ioo 0 x))]
congr 1 with t : 1
have : t ≤ 0 ∨ t ∈ Ioo 0 x ∨ x ≤ t := by
rcases le_or_lt t 0 with (h | h)
· exact Or.inl h
· rcases lt_or_le t x with (h' | h')
exacts [Or.inr (Or.inl ⟨h, h'⟩), Or.inr (Or.inr h')]
rcases this with (ht | ht | ht)
· rw [indicator_of_not_mem (not_mem_Ioo_of_le ht), indicator_of_not_mem (not_mem_Ioi.mpr ht),
ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
· rw [indicator_of_mem ht, indicator_of_mem (mem_Ioi.mpr ht.1),
indicator_of_mem (mem_Ioi.mpr <| sub_pos.mpr ht.2)]
· rw [indicator_of_not_mem (not_mem_Ioo_of_ge ht),
indicator_of_not_mem (not_mem_Ioi.mpr (sub_nonpos_of_le ht)),
ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
· convert (integral_zero ℝ F).symm with t
by_cases ht : 0 < t
· rw [indicator_of_not_mem (_ : x - t ∉ Ioi 0), ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rw [not_mem_Ioi] at h ⊢
exact sub_nonpos.mpr (h.trans ht.le)
· rw [indicator_of_not_mem (mem_Ioi.not.mpr ht), ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem integrable_posConvolution {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → E'} {μ ν : Measure ℝ} [SFinite μ]
[SFinite ν] [IsAddRightInvariant μ] [NoAtoms ν] (hf : IntegrableOn f (Ioi 0) ν)
(hg : IntegrableOn g (Ioi 0) μ) (L : E →L[ℝ] E' →L[ℝ] F) :
Integrable (posConvolution f g L ν) μ := by
rw [← integrable_indicator_iff (measurableSet_Ioi : MeasurableSet (Ioi (0 : ℝ)))] at hf hg
rw [posConvolution_eq_convolution_indicator f g L ν]
exact (hf.convolution_integrand L hg).integral_prod_left
/-- The integral over `Ioi 0` of a forward convolution of two functions is equal to the product
of their integrals over this set. (Compare `integral_convolution` for the two-sided convolution.) -/
theorem integral_posConvolution [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace E'] [CompleteSpace F]
{μ ν : Measure ℝ}
[SFinite μ] [SFinite ν] [IsAddRightInvariant μ] [NoAtoms ν] {f : ℝ → E} {g : ℝ → E'}
(hf : IntegrableOn f (Ioi 0) ν) (hg : IntegrableOn g (Ioi 0) μ) (L : E →L[ℝ] E' →L[ℝ] F) :
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ∫ t : ℝ in (0)..x, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂ν ∂μ =
L (∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, f x ∂ν) (∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, g x ∂μ) := by
rw [← integrable_indicator_iff measurableSet_Ioi] at hf hg
simp_rw [← integral_indicator measurableSet_Ioi]
convert integral_convolution L hf hg using 4 with x
apply posConvolution_eq_convolution_indicator
end Nonneg
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convolution.lean | 1,479 | 1,486 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Measurability criterion for ennreal-valued functions
Consider a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`. If the level sets `{f < p}` and `{q < f}` have measurable
supersets which are disjoint up to measure zero when `p` and `q` are finite numbers satisfying
`p < q`, then `f` is almost-everywhere measurable. This is proved in
`ENNReal.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets`, and deduced from an analogous statement
for any target space which is a complete linear dense order, called
`MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets`.
Note that it should be enough to assume that the space is a conditionally complete linear order,
but the proof would be more painful. Since our only use for now is for `ℝ≥0∞`, we keep it as simple
as possible.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal NNReal
/-- If a function `f : α → β` is such that the level sets `{f < p}` and `{q < f}` have measurable
supersets which are disjoint up to measure zero when `p < q`, then `f` is almost-everywhere
measurable. It is even enough to have this for `p` and `q` in a countable dense set. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets {α : Type*}
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {β : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder β] [DenselyOrdered β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] [SecondCountableTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] (s : Set β) (s_count : s.Countable) (s_dense : Dense s) (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ p ∈ s, ∀ q ∈ s, p < q → ∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | q < f x } ⊆ v ∧ μ (u ∩ v) = 0) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by
classical
haveI : Encodable s := s_count.toEncodable
have h' : ∀ p q, ∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | q < f x } ⊆ v ∧ (p ∈ s → q ∈ s → p < q → μ (u ∩ v) = 0) := by
intro p q
by_cases H : p ∈ s ∧ q ∈ s ∧ p < q
· rcases h p H.1 q H.2.1 H.2.2 with ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h'u, h'v, hμ⟩
exact ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h'u, h'v, fun _ _ _ => hμ⟩
· refine
⟨univ, univ, MeasurableSet.univ, MeasurableSet.univ, subset_univ _, subset_univ _,
fun ps qs pq => ?_⟩
simp only [not_and] at H
exact (H ps qs pq).elim
choose! u v huv using h'
let u' : β → Set α := fun p => ⋂ q ∈ s ∩ Ioi p, u p q
have u'_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (u' i) := by
intro i
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (s_count.mono inter_subset_left) fun b _ => (huv i b).1
let f' : α → β := fun x => ⨅ i : s, piecewise (u' i) (fun _ => (i : β)) (fun _ => (⊤ : β)) x
have f'_meas : Measurable f' := by fun_prop (disch := aesop)
let t := ⋃ (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), u' p ∩ v p q
have μt : μ t ≤ 0 :=
calc
μ t ≤ ∑' (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), μ (u' p ∩ v p q) := by
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).trans ?_
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun p => ?_
haveI := (s_count.mono (s.inter_subset_left (t := Ioi ↑p))).to_subtype
apply measure_iUnion_le
_ ≤ ∑' (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), μ (u p q ∩ v p q) := by
gcongr with p q
exact biInter_subset_of_mem q.2
_ = ∑' (p : s) (_ : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
congr
ext1 p
congr
ext1 q
exact (huv p q).2.2.2.2 p.2 q.2.1 q.2.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero]
have ff' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x = f' x := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := by
have : μ t = 0 := le_antisymm μt bot_le
change μ _ = 0
convert this
ext y
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_not_mem]
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
apply (iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt _ _).symm
· intro i
by_cases H : x ∈ u' i
swap
· simp only [H, le_top, not_false_iff, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
simp only [H, piecewise_eq_of_mem]
contrapose! hx
obtain ⟨r, ⟨xr, rq⟩, rs⟩ : ∃ r, r ∈ Ioo (i : β) (f x) ∩ s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.1 s_dense (Ioo i (f x)) isOpen_Ioo (nonempty_Ioo.2 hx)
have A : x ∈ v i r := (huv i r).2.2.2.1 rq
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ?_⟩
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨r, ⟨rs, xr⟩⟩, ?_⟩
exact ⟨H, A⟩
· intro q hq
obtain ⟨r, ⟨xr, rq⟩, rs⟩ : ∃ r, r ∈ Ioo (f x) q ∩ s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.1 s_dense (Ioo (f x) q) isOpen_Ioo (nonempty_Ioo.2 hq)
refine ⟨⟨r, rs⟩, ?_⟩
have A : x ∈ u' r := mem_biInter fun i _ => (huv r i).2.2.1 xr
simp only [A, rq, piecewise_eq_of_mem, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact ⟨f', f'_meas, ff'⟩
/-- If a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` is such that the level sets `{f < p}` and `{q < f}` have measurable
supersets which are disjoint up to measure zero when `p` and `q` are finite numbers satisfying
`p < q`, then `f` is almost-everywhere measurable. -/
theorem ENNReal.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ (p : ℝ≥0) (q : ℝ≥0), p < q →
∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < f x } ⊆ v ∧ μ (u ∩ v) = 0) :
| AEMeasurable f μ := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, _, s_top⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s :=
ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
have I : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≠ ∞ := fun x xs hx => s_top (hx ▸ xs)
apply MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets μ s s_count s_dense _
rintro p hp q hq hpq
lift p to ℝ≥0 using I p hp
lift q to ℝ≥0 using I q hq
exact h p q (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 hpq)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEMeasurableOrder.lean | 113 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
/-!
# Locus of unequal values of finitely supported functions
Let `α N` be two Types, assume that `N` has a `0` and let `f g : α →₀ N` be finitely supported
functions.
## Main definition
* `Finsupp.neLocus f g : Finset α`, the finite subset of `α` where `f` and `g` differ.
In the case in which `N` is an additive group, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` coincides with
`Finsupp.support (f - g)`.
-/
variable {α M N P : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
section NHasZero
variable [DecidableEq N] [Zero N] (f g : α →₀ N)
/-- Given two finitely supported functions `f g : α →₀ N`, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` is the `Finset`
where `f` and `g` differ. This generalizes `(f - g).support` to situations without subtraction. -/
def neLocus (f g : α →₀ N) : Finset α :=
(f.support ∪ g.support).filter fun x => f x ≠ g x
@[simp]
theorem mem_neLocus {f g : α →₀ N} {a : α} : a ∈ f.neLocus g ↔ f a ≠ g a := by
simpa only [neLocus, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp] using Ne.ne_or_ne _
theorem not_mem_neLocus {f g : α →₀ N} {a : α} : a ∉ f.neLocus g ↔ f a = g a :=
mem_neLocus.not.trans not_ne_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_neLocus : ↑(f.neLocus g) = { x | f x ≠ g x } := by
ext
exact mem_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_eq_empty {f g : α →₀ N} : f.neLocus g = ∅ ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h =>
ext fun a => not_not.mp (mem_neLocus.not.mp (Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp h a)),
fun h => h ▸ by simp only [neLocus, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Finset.filter_False]⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_neLocus_iff {f g : α →₀ N} : (f.neLocus g).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ g :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans neLocus_eq_empty.not
theorem neLocus_comm : f.neLocus g = g.neLocus f := by
simp_rw [neLocus, Finset.union_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_right : f.neLocus 0 = f.support := by
ext
rw [mem_neLocus, mem_support_iff, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_left : (0 : α →₀ N).neLocus f = f.support :=
(neLocus_comm _ _).trans (neLocus_zero_right _)
end NHasZero
section NeLocusAndMaps
theorem subset_mapRange_neLocus [DecidableEq N] [Zero N] [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] (f g : α →₀ N)
{F : N → M} (F0 : F 0 = 0) : (f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) ⊆ f.neLocus g :=
fun x => by simpa only [mem_neLocus, mapRange_apply, not_imp_not] using congr_arg F
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_left [DecidableEq N] [Zero M] [DecidableEq P] [Zero P] [Zero N]
{F : M → N → P} (F0 : F 0 0 = 0) (f : α →₀ M) (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ N)
(hF : ∀ f, Function.Injective fun g => F f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f g₁).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f g₂) = g₁.neLocus g₂ := by
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF _).ne_iff
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_right [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] [DecidableEq P] [Zero P] [Zero N]
{F : M → N → P} (F0 : F 0 0 = 0) (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ M) (g : α →₀ N)
(hF : ∀ g, Function.Injective fun f => F f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f₁ g).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f₂ g) = f₁.neLocus f₂ := by
ext
| simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF _).ne_iff
theorem mapRange_neLocus_eq [DecidableEq N] [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] [Zero N] (f g : α →₀ N)
{F : N → M} (F0 : F 0 = 0) (hF : Function.Injective F) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) = f.neLocus g := by
ext
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/NeLocus.lean | 93 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.BoundedLattice
/-!
# Complete lattice homomorphisms
This file defines frame homomorphisms and complete lattice homomorphisms.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `sSupHom`: Maps which preserve `⨆`.
* `sInfHom`: Maps which preserve `⨅`.
* `FrameHom`: Frame homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⨆`, `⊓` and `⊤`.
* `CompleteLatticeHom`: Complete lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⨆` and `⨅`.
## Typeclasses
* `sSupHomClass`
* `sInfHomClass`
* `FrameHomClass`
* `CompleteLatticeHomClass`
## Concrete homs
* `CompleteLatticeHom.setPreimage`: `Set.preimage` as a complete lattice homomorphism.
## TODO
Frame homs are Heyting homs.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-- The type of `⨆`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure sSupHom (α β : Type*) [SupSet α] [SupSet β] where
/-- The underlying function of a sSupHom. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The proposition that a `sSupHom` commutes with arbitrary suprema/joins. -/
map_sSup' (s : Set α) : toFun (sSup s) = sSup (toFun '' s)
/-- The type of `⨅`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure sInfHom (α β : Type*) [InfSet α] [InfSet β] where
/-- The underlying function of an `sInfHom`. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- The proposition that a `sInfHom` commutes with arbitrary infima/meets -/
map_sInf' (s : Set α) : toFun (sInf s) = sInf (toFun '' s)
/-- The type of frame homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. They preserve finite meets and arbitrary joins.
-/
structure FrameHom (α β : Type*) [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] extends
InfTopHom α β where
/-- The proposition that frame homomorphisms commute with arbitrary suprema/joins. -/
map_sSup' (s : Set α) : toFun (sSup s) = sSup (toFun '' s)
/-- The type of complete lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure CompleteLatticeHom (α β : Type*) [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] extends
sInfHom α β where
/-- The proposition that complete lattice homomorphism commutes with arbitrary suprema/joins. -/
map_sSup' (s : Set α) : toFun (sSup s) = sSup (toFun '' s)
section
/-- `sSupHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⨆`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `sSupHom`. -/
class sSupHomClass (F α β : Type*) [SupSet α] [SupSet β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that members of `sSupHomClass`s commute with arbitrary suprema/joins. -/
map_sSup (f : F) (s : Set α) : f (sSup s) = sSup (f '' s)
/-- `sInfHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⨅`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `sInfHom`. -/
class sInfHomClass (F α β : Type*) [InfSet α] [InfSet β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that members of `sInfHomClass`s commute with arbitrary infima/meets. -/
map_sInf (f : F) (s : Set α) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s)
/-- `FrameHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of frame morphisms. They preserve `⊓` and `⨆`.
You should extend this class when you extend `FrameHom`. -/
class FrameHomClass (F α β : Type*) [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends InfTopHomClass F α β where
/-- The proposition that members of `FrameHomClass` commute with arbitrary suprema/joins. -/
map_sSup (f : F) (s : Set α) : f (sSup s) = sSup (f '' s)
/-- `CompleteLatticeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of complete lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `CompleteLatticeHom`. -/
class CompleteLatticeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β]
[FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends sInfHomClass F α β where
/-- The proposition that members of `CompleteLatticeHomClass` commute with arbitrary
suprema/joins. -/
map_sSup (f : F) (s : Set α) : f (sSup s) = sSup (f '' s)
end
export sSupHomClass (map_sSup)
export sInfHomClass (map_sInf)
attribute [simp] map_sSup map_sInf
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
@[simp] theorem map_iSup [SupSet α] [SupSet β] [sSupHomClass F α β] (f : F) (g : ι → α) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) := by simp [iSup, ← Set.range_comp, Function.comp_def]
theorem map_iSup₂ [SupSet α] [SupSet β] [sSupHomClass F α β] (f : F) (g : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨆ (i) (j), g i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), f (g i j) := by simp_rw [map_iSup]
@[simp] theorem map_iInf [InfSet α] [InfSet β] [sInfHomClass F α β] (f : F) (g : ι → α) :
f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) := by simp [iInf, ← Set.range_comp, Function.comp_def]
theorem map_iInf₂ [InfSet α] [InfSet β] [sInfHomClass F α β] (f : F) (g : ∀ i, κ i → α) :
f (⨅ (i) (j), g i j) = ⨅ (i) (j), f (g i j) := by simp_rw [map_iInf]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) sSupHomClass.toSupBotHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [sSupHomClass F α β] : SupBotHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹sSupHomClass F α β› with
map_sup := fun f a b => by
rw [← sSup_pair, map_sSup]
simp only [Set.image_pair, sSup_insert, sSup_singleton]
map_bot := fun f => by
rw [← sSup_empty, map_sSup, Set.image_empty, sSup_empty] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) sInfHomClass.toInfTopHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [sInfHomClass F α β] : InfTopHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹sInfHomClass F α β› with
map_inf := fun f a b => by
rw [← sInf_pair, map_sInf, Set.image_pair]
simp only [Set.image_pair, sInf_insert, sInf_singleton]
map_top := fun f => by
rw [← sInf_empty, map_sInf, Set.image_empty, sInf_empty] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) FrameHomClass.tosSupHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [FrameHomClass F α β] : sSupHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹FrameHomClass F α β› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) FrameHomClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [FrameHomClass F α β] : BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹FrameHomClass F α β›, sSupHomClass.toSupBotHomClass with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLatticeHomClass.toFrameHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [CompleteLatticeHomClass F α β] : FrameHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹CompleteLatticeHomClass F α β›, sInfHomClass.toInfTopHomClass with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLatticeHomClass.toBoundedLatticeHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [CompleteLatticeHomClass F α β] : BoundedLatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ sSupHomClass.toSupBotHomClass, sInfHomClass.toInfTopHomClass with }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.tosSupHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : sSupHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_sSup := fun f s =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by
simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sSup_le_iff, Set.forall_mem_image] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.tosInfHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : sInfHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_sInf := fun f s =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by
simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_sInf_iff, Set.forall_mem_image] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toCompleteLatticeHomClass [CompleteLattice α]
[CompleteLattice β] [OrderIsoClass F α β] : CompleteLatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.tosSupHomClass, OrderIsoClass.tosInfHomClass with }
end Equiv
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- Reinterpret an order isomorphism as a morphism of complete lattices. -/
@[simps] def OrderIso.toCompleteLatticeHom [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β]
(f : OrderIso α β) : CompleteLatticeHom α β where
toFun := f
map_sInf' := sInfHomClass.map_sInf f
map_sSup' := sSupHomClass.map_sSup f
instance [SupSet α] [SupSet β] [sSupHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (sSupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sSup f⟩⟩
instance [InfSet α] [InfSet β] [sInfHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (sInfHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sInf f⟩⟩
instance [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] [FrameHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (FrameHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sSup f⟩⟩
instance [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] [CompleteLatticeHomClass F α β] :
CoeTC F (CompleteLatticeHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sSup f⟩⟩
/-! ### Supremum homomorphisms -/
namespace sSupHom
variable [SupSet α]
section SupSet
variable [SupSet β] [SupSet γ] [SupSet δ]
instance : FunLike (sSupHom α β) α β where
coe := sSupHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : sSupHomClass (sSupHom α β) α β where
map_sSup := sSupHom.map_sSup'
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_coe (f : sSupHom α β) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : sSupHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `sSupHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : sSupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : sSupHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sSup' := h.symm ▸ f.map_sSup'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : sSupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : sSupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `sSupHom`. -/
protected def id : sSupHom α α :=
⟨id, fun s => by rw [id, Set.image_id]⟩
instance : Inhabited (sSupHom α α) :=
⟨sSupHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(sSupHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : sSupHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `sSupHom`s as a `sSupHom`. -/
def comp (f : sSupHom β γ) (g : sSupHom α β) : sSupHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_sSup' s := by rw [comp_apply, map_sSup, map_sSup, Set.image_image]; simp only [Function.comp]
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : sSupHom β γ) (g : sSupHom α β) : ⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : sSupHom β γ) (g : sSupHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : sSupHom γ δ) (g : sSupHom β γ) (h : sSupHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : sSupHom α β) : f.comp (sSupHom.id α) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : sSupHom α β) : (sSupHom.id β).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : sSupHom β γ} {f : sSupHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, congr_arg (fun a ↦ comp a f)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : sSupHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : sSupHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← comp_apply, h, comp_apply], congr_arg _⟩
end SupSet
variable {_ : CompleteLattice β}
instance : PartialOrder (sSupHom α β) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance : Bot (sSupHom α β) :=
⟨⟨fun _ => ⊥, fun s => by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [Set.image_empty, sSup_empty]
· rw [hs.image_const, sSup_singleton]⟩⟩
instance : OrderBot (sSupHom α β) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun _ _ ↦ CompleteLattice.bot_le _
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : sSupHom α β) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_apply (a : α) : (⊥ : sSupHom α β) a = ⊥ :=
rfl
end sSupHom
/-! ### Infimum homomorphisms -/
namespace sInfHom
variable [InfSet α]
section InfSet
variable [InfSet β] [InfSet γ] [InfSet δ]
| instance : FunLike (sInfHom α β) α β where
coe := sInfHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/CompleteLattice.lean | 354 | 356 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Basic
/-!
# The category of arrows
The category of arrows, with morphisms commutative squares.
We set this up as a specialization of the comma category `Comma L R`,
where `L` and `R` are both the identity functor.
## Tags
comma, arrow
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
variable {T : Type u} [Category.{v} T]
section
variable (T)
/-- The arrow category of `T` has as objects all morphisms in `T` and as morphisms commutative
squares in `T`. -/
def Arrow :=
Comma.{v, v, v} (𝟭 T) (𝟭 T)
-- The `Category` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Category (Arrow T) := commaCategory
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter
instance Arrow.inhabited [Inhabited T] : Inhabited (Arrow T) where
default := show Comma (𝟭 T) (𝟭 T) from default
end
namespace Arrow
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {X Y : Arrow T} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h₁ : f.left = g.left) (h₂ : f.right = g.right) :
f = g :=
CommaMorphism.ext h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem id_left (f : Arrow T) : CommaMorphism.left (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 f.left :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_right (f : Arrow T) : CommaMorphism.right (𝟙 f) = 𝟙 f.right :=
rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_left {X Y Z : Arrow T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).left = f.left ≫ g.left := rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_right {X Y Z : Arrow T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).right = f.right ≫ g.right := rfl
/-- An object in the arrow category is simply a morphism in `T`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {X Y : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow T where
left := X
right := Y
hom := f
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (f : Arrow T) : Arrow.mk f.hom = f := by
cases f
rfl
theorem mk_injective (A B : T) :
Function.Injective (Arrow.mk : (A ⟶ B) → Arrow T) := fun f g h => by
cases h
rfl
theorem mk_inj (A B : T) {f g : A ⟶ B} : Arrow.mk f = Arrow.mk g ↔ f = g :=
(mk_injective A B).eq_iff
instance {X Y : T} : CoeOut (X ⟶ Y) (Arrow T) where
coe := mk
lemma mk_eq_mk_iff {X Y X' Y' : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') :
Arrow.mk f = Arrow.mk f' ↔
∃ (hX : X = X') (hY : Y = Y'), f = eqToHom hX ≫ f' ≫ eqToHom hY.symm := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨congr_arg Comma.left h, congr_arg Comma.right h, ?_⟩
have := (eqToIso h).hom.w
dsimp at this
rw [Comma.eqToHom_left, Comma.eqToHom_right] at this
rw [reassoc_of% this, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, h⟩
simp only [eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp] at h
rw [h]
lemma ext {f g : Arrow T}
(h₁ : f.left = g.left) (h₂ : f.right = g.right)
(h₃ : f.hom = eqToHom h₁ ≫ g.hom ≫ eqToHom h₂.symm) : f = g :=
(mk_eq_mk_iff _ _).2 (by aesop)
@[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_comp_eqToHom {X Y Y' : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y = Y') :
Arrow.mk (f ≫ eqToHom h) = Arrow.mk f :=
ext rfl h.symm (by simp)
@[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_eqToHom_comp {X' X Y : T} (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : X' = X) :
Arrow.mk (eqToHom h ≫ f) = Arrow.mk f :=
ext h rfl (by simp)
/-- A morphism in the arrow category is a commutative square connecting two objects of the arrow
category. -/
@[simps]
def homMk {f g : Arrow T} (u : f.left ⟶ g.left) (v : f.right ⟶ g.right)
(w : u ≫ g.hom = f.hom ≫ v := by aesop_cat) : f ⟶ g where
left := u
right := v
w := w
/-- We can also build a morphism in the arrow category out of any commutative square in `T`. -/
@[simps]
def homMk' {X Y : T} {f : X ⟶ Y} {P Q : T} {g : P ⟶ Q} (u : X ⟶ P) (v : Y ⟶ Q)
(w : u ≫ g = f ≫ v := by aesop_cat) :
Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk g where
left := u
right := v
w := w
-- `w_mk_left` is not needed, as it is a consequence of `w` and `mk_hom`.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem w_mk_right {f : Arrow T} {X Y : T} {g : X ⟶ Y} (sq : f ⟶ mk g) :
sq.left ≫ g = f.hom ≫ sq.right :=
sq.w
@[reassoc]
theorem w {f g : Arrow T} (sq : f ⟶ g) : sq.left ≫ g.hom = f.hom ≫ sq.right := by
simp
theorem isIso_of_isIso_left_of_isIso_right {f g : Arrow T} (ff : f ⟶ g) [IsIso ff.left]
[IsIso ff.right] : IsIso ff where
out := by
let inverse : g ⟶ f := ⟨inv ff.left, inv ff.right, (by simp)⟩
apply Exists.intro inverse
aesop_cat
/-- Create an isomorphism between arrows,
by providing isomorphisms between the domains and codomains,
and a proof that the square commutes. -/
@[simps!]
def isoMk {f g : Arrow T} (l : f.left ≅ g.left) (r : f.right ≅ g.right)
(h : l.hom ≫ g.hom = f.hom ≫ r.hom := by aesop_cat) : f ≅ g :=
Comma.isoMk l r h
/-- A variant of `Arrow.isoMk` that creates an iso between two `Arrow.mk`s with a better type
signature. -/
abbrev isoMk' {W X Y Z : T} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (e₁ : W ≅ Y) (e₂ : X ≅ Z)
(h : e₁.hom ≫ g = f ≫ e₂.hom := by aesop_cat) : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g :=
Arrow.isoMk e₁ e₂ h
theorem hom.congr_left {f g : Arrow T} {φ₁ φ₂ : f ⟶ g} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) : φ₁.left = φ₂.left := by
rw [h]
@[simp]
theorem hom.congr_right {f g : Arrow T} {φ₁ φ₂ : f ⟶ g} (h : φ₁ = φ₂) : φ₁.right = φ₂.right := by
rw [h]
theorem iso_w {f g : Arrow T} (e : f ≅ g) : g.hom = e.inv.left ≫ f.hom ≫ e.hom.right := by
have eq := Arrow.hom.congr_right e.inv_hom_id
rw [Arrow.comp_right, Arrow.id_right] at eq
rw [Arrow.w_assoc, eq, Category.comp_id]
theorem iso_w' {W X Y Z : T} {f : W ⟶ X} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) :
g = e.inv.left ≫ f ≫ e.hom.right :=
iso_w e
section
variable {f g : Arrow T} (sq : f ⟶ g)
instance isIso_left [IsIso sq] : IsIso sq.left where
out := by
apply Exists.intro (inv sq).left
simp only [← Comma.comp_left, IsIso.hom_inv_id, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Arrow.id_left,
eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
simp
instance isIso_right [IsIso sq] : IsIso sq.right where
out := by
apply Exists.intro (inv sq).right
| simp only [← Comma.comp_right, IsIso.hom_inv_id, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Arrow.id_right,
eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Comma/Arrow.lean | 203 | 204 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Ordinal notation
Constructive ordinal arithmetic for ordinals below `ε₀`.
We define a type `ONote`, with constructors `0 : ONote` and `ONote.oadd e n a` representing
`ω ^ e * n + a`.
We say that `o` is in Cantor normal form - `ONote.NF o` - if either `o = 0` or
`o = ω ^ e * n + a` with `a < ω ^ e` and `a` in Cantor normal form.
The type `NONote` is the type of ordinals below `ε₀` in Cantor normal form.
Various operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, exponentiation)
are defined on `ONote` and `NONote`.
-/
open Ordinal Order
-- The generated theorem `ONote.zero.sizeOf_spec` is flagged by `simpNF`,
-- and we don't otherwise need it.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- Recursive definition of an ordinal notation. `zero` denotes the ordinal 0, and `oadd e n a` is
intended to refer to `ω ^ e * n + a`. For this to be a valid Cantor normal form, we must have the
exponents decrease to the right, but we can't state this condition until we've defined `repr`, so we
make it a separate definition `NF`. -/
inductive ONote : Type
| zero : ONote
| oadd : ONote → ℕ+ → ONote → ONote
deriving DecidableEq
compile_inductive% ONote
namespace ONote
/-- Notation for 0 -/
instance : Zero ONote :=
⟨zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : zero = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited ONote :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Notation for 1 -/
instance : One ONote :=
⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
/-- Notation for ω -/
def omega : ONote :=
oadd 1 1 0
/-- The ordinal denoted by a notation -/
noncomputable def repr : ONote → Ordinal.{0}
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
@[simp] theorem repr_zero : repr 0 = 0 := rfl
attribute [simp] repr.eq_1 repr.eq_2
/-- Print `ω^s*n`, omitting `s` if `e = 0` or `e = 1`, and omitting `n` if `n = 1` -/
private def toString_aux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ) (s : String) : String :=
if e = 0 then toString n
else (if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++ if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ toString n
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def toString : ONote → String
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n 0 => toString_aux e n (toString e)
| oadd e n a => toString_aux e n (toString e) ++ " + " ++ toString a
open Lean in
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def repr' (prec : ℕ) : ONote → Format
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n a =>
Repr.addAppParen
("oadd " ++ (repr' max_prec e) ++ " " ++ Nat.repr (n : ℕ) ++ " " ++ (repr' max_prec a))
prec
instance : ToString ONote :=
⟨toString⟩
instance : Repr ONote where
reprPrec o prec := repr' prec o
instance : Preorder ONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
theorem lt_def {x y : ONote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {x y : ONote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : WellFoundedRelation ONote :=
⟨(· < ·), InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf⟩
/-- Convert a `Nat` into an ordinal -/
@[coe] def ofNat : ℕ → ONote
| 0 => 0
| Nat.succ n => oadd 0 n.succPNat 0
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
@[simp] theorem ofNat_zero : ofNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_succ (n) : ofNat (Nat.succ n) = oadd 0 n.succPNat 0 :=
rfl
instance (priority := low) nat (n : ℕ) : OfNat ONote n where
ofNat := ofNat n
@[simp 1200] theorem ofNat_one : ofNat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem repr_ofNat (n : ℕ) : repr (ofNat n) = n := by cases n <;> simp
@[simp] theorem repr_one : repr 1 = (1 : ℕ) := repr_ofNat 1
theorem omega0_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e) omega0_pos).2 (Nat.cast_le.2 n.2)
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ (ω ^ repr e) _ (opow_pos (repr e) omega0_pos) (omega0_le_oadd e n a)
/-- Comparison of ordinal notations:
`ω ^ e₁ * n₁ + a₁` is less than `ω ^ e₂ * n₂ + a₂` when either `e₁ < e₂`, or `e₁ = e₂` and
`n₁ < n₂`, or `e₁ = e₂`, `n₁ = n₂`, and `a₁ < a₂`. -/
def cmp : ONote → ONote → Ordering
| 0, 0 => Ordering.eq
| _, 0 => Ordering.gt
| 0, _ => Ordering.lt
| _o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), _o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) =>
(cmp e₁ e₂).then <| (_root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂).then (cmp a₁ a₂)
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = Ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0, 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, h => by injection h
| 0, oadd e n a, h => by injection h
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h => by
revert h; simp only [cmp]
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁
revert h; cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h
rw [_root_.cmp, cmpUsing_eq_eq, not_lt, not_lt, ← le_antisymm_iff] at h₂
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq h₂
simp
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ONote) < 1 := by
simp only [lt_def, repr_zero, repr_one, Nat.cast_one, zero_lt_one]
/-- `NFBelow o b` says that `o` is a normal form ordinal notation satisfying `repr o < ω ^ b`. -/
inductive NFBelow : ONote → Ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NFBelow 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NFBelow e eb → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
/-- A normal form ordinal notation has the form
`ω ^ a₁ * n₁ + ω ^ a₂ * n₂ + ⋯ + ω ^ aₖ * nₖ`
where `a₁ > a₂ > ⋯ > aₖ` and all the `aᵢ` are also in normal form.
We will essentially only be interested in normal form ordinal notations, but to avoid complicating
the algorithms, we define everything over general ordinal notations and only prove correctness with
normal form as an invariant. -/
class NF (o : ONote) : Prop where
out : Exists (NFBelow o)
instance NF.zero : NF 0 :=
⟨⟨0, NFBelow.zero⟩⟩
theorem NFBelow.oadd {e n a b} : NF e → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => NFBelow.oadd' h
theorem NFBelow.fst {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NF e := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.fst
theorem NFBelow.snd {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NFBelow a (repr e) := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact h₂
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NFBelow a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.snd
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n) (h₂ : NFBelow a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NFBelow.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (ONote.oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NFBelow.zero
theorem NFBelow.lt {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b := by
obtain - | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h; exact h₃
theorem NFBelow_zero : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (Ordinal.zero_le _), fun e => e.symm ▸ NFBelow.zero⟩
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 := by
simpa [e0, NFBelow_zero] using h.snd'
theorem NFBelow.repr_lt {o b} (h : NFBelow o b) : repr o < ω ^ b := by
induction h with
| zero => exact opow_pos _ omega0_pos
| oadd' _ _ h₃ _ IH =>
rw [repr]
| apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Notation.lean | 233 | 234 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Convex
/-!
# Sides of affine subspaces
This file defines notions of two points being on the same or opposite sides of an affine subspace.
## Main definitions
* `s.WSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SSameSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.WOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
* `s.SOppSide x y`: The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of the affine
subspace `s`.
-/
variable {R V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
namespace AffineSubspace
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on the same side of `s`. -/
def WSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on the same side of `s`. -/
def SSameSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WSameSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
/-- The points `x` and `y` are weakly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def WOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
∃ᵉ (p₁ ∈ s) (p₂ ∈ s), SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y)
/-- The points `x` and `y` are strictly on opposite sides of `s`. -/
def SOppSide (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x y : P) : Prop :=
s.WOppSide x y ∧ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s
theorem WSameSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
simp_rw [SSameSide, hf.wSameSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wSameSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sSameSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SSameSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sSameSide_map_iff
theorem WOppSide.map {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) := by
rcases h with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨f p₁, mem_map_of_mem f hp₁, f p₂, mem_map_of_mem f hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub]
exact h.map f.linear
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rcases h with ⟨fp₁, hfp₁, fp₂, hfp₂, h⟩
rw [mem_map] at hfp₁ hfp₂
rcases hfp₁ with ⟨p₁, hp₁, rfl⟩
rcases hfp₂ with ⟨p₂, hp₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← linearMap_vsub, (f.linear_injective_iff.2 hf).sameRay_map_iff] at h
exact h
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P}
{f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(s.map f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
simp_rw [SOppSide, hf.wOppSide_map_iff, mem_map_iff_mem_of_injective hf]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.wOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).WOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).wOppSide_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineEquiv.sOppSide_map_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
(s.map ↑f).SOppSide (f x) (f y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y :=
(show Function.Injective f.toAffineMap from f.injective).sOppSide_map_iff
theorem WSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem WOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.WOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.choose, h.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SOppSide.nonempty {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
(s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨h.1.choose, h.1.choose_spec.left⟩
theorem SSameSide.wSameSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SSameSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SSameSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SSameSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem SOppSide.wOppSide {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
h.1
theorem SOppSide.left_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : x ∉ s :=
h.2.1
theorem SOppSide.right_not_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} (h : s.SOppSide x y) : y ∉ s :=
h.2.2
theorem wSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WSameSide x y ↔ s.WSameSide y x :=
⟨fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩,
fun ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩ => ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, h.symm⟩⟩
alias ⟨WSameSide.symm, _⟩ := wSameSide_comm
theorem sSameSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SSameSide x y ↔ s.SSameSide y x := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SSameSide.symm, _⟩ := sSameSide_comm
theorem wOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.WOppSide x y ↔ s.WOppSide y x := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
alias ⟨WOppSide.symm, _⟩ := wOppSide_comm
theorem sOppSide_comm {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} : s.SOppSide x y ↔ s.SOppSide y x := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_comm, and_comm (b := x ∉ s)]
alias ⟨SOppSide.symm, _⟩ := sOppSide_comm
theorem not_wSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WSameSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sSameSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SSameSide x y :=
fun h => not_wSameSide_bot x y h.wSameSide
theorem not_wOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).WOppSide x y :=
fun ⟨_, h, _⟩ => h.elim
theorem not_sOppSide_bot (x y : P) : ¬(⊥ : AffineSubspace R P).SOppSide x y :=
fun h => not_wOppSide_bot x y h.wOppSide
@[simp]
theorem wSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.WSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => h.nonempty, fun ⟨p, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp, p, hp, SameRay.rfl⟩⟩
theorem sSameSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} :
s.SSameSide x x ↔ (s : Set P).Nonempty ∧ x ∉ s :=
⟨fun ⟨h, hx, _⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.1 h, hx⟩, fun ⟨h, hx⟩ => ⟨wSameSide_self_iff.2 h, hx, hx⟩⟩
theorem wSameSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wSameSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y :=
(wSameSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wOppSide_of_left_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y := by
refine ⟨x, hx, x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [vsub_self]
apply SameRay.zero_left
theorem wOppSide_of_right_mem {s : AffineSubspace R P} (x : P) {y : P} (hy : y ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y :=
(wOppSide_of_left_mem x hy).symm
theorem wSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WSameSide x y := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wSameSide_comm]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [SSameSide, SSameSide, wSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sSameSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SSameSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SSameSide x y := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sSameSide_comm]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine
⟨-v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (Submodule.neg_mem _ hv) hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← vadd_vsub_assoc]
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
refine ⟨v +ᵥ p₁, AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp₁, p₂, hp₂, ?_⟩
rwa [vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_left]
theorem wOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.WOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.WOppSide x y := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, wOppSide_comm]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_left_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide (v +ᵥ x) y ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [SOppSide, SOppSide, wOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, vadd_mem_iff_mem_of_mem_direction hv]
theorem sOppSide_vadd_right_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y : P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) :
s.SOppSide x (v +ᵥ y) ↔ s.SOppSide x y := by
rw [sOppSide_comm, sOppSide_vadd_left_iff hv, sOppSide_comm]
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ ht
theorem wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wSameSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wSameSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : 0 ≤ t) : s.WSameSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wSameSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) x := by
refine ⟨p₂, hp₂, p₁, hp₁, ?_⟩
rw [vadd_vsub, ← neg_neg t, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
exact SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left _ (neg_nonneg.2 ht)
theorem wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (x : P) (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) {t : R} (ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide x (t • (x -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ p₂) :=
(wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left x hp₁ hp₂ ht).symm
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide (lineMap x y t) y :=
wOppSide_smul_vsub_vadd_left y h h ht
theorem wOppSide_lineMap_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} (y : P) (h : x ∈ s) {t : R}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : s.WOppSide y (lineMap x y t) :=
(wOppSide_lineMap_left y h ht).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact wSameSide_lineMap_left z hx ht0
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₃₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hx : x ∈ s) : s.WSameSide z y :=
(h.wSameSide₂₃ hx).symm
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₁₂ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide x y :=
h.symm.wSameSide₃₂ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wSameSide₂₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hz : z ∈ s) : s.WSameSide y x :=
h.symm.wSameSide₂₃ hz
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₁₃ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide x z := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hy, _, hy, ?_⟩
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_one]; simp
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap
· rw [lineMap_apply_zero]; simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z, vsub_self]
module
theorem _root_.Wbtw.wOppSide₃₁ {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z)
(hy : y ∈ s) : s.WOppSide z x :=
h.symm.wOppSide₁₃ hy
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
@[simp]
theorem wOppSide_self_iff {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x : P} : s.WOppSide x x ↔ x ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, -, -, -, -, h₁, -⟩ := h.exists_eq_smul_add
rw [add_comm, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at h₁
rw [h₁]
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem a hp₂ hp₁ hp₁
· exact fun h => ⟨x, h, x, h, SameRay.rfl⟩
theorem not_sOppSide_self (s : AffineSubspace R P) (x : P) : ¬s.SOppSide x x := by
rw [SOppSide]
simp
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← hr, smul_smul, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr₂.ne.symm,
← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wSameSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WSameSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [wSameSide_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [SSameSide, and_comm, wSameSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
theorem sSameSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SSameSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (y -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [sSameSide_comm, sSameSide_iff_exists_left h, ← and_assoc, and_comm (a := y ∉ s), and_assoc]
simp_rw [SameRay.sameRay_comm]
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ x ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p₁', hp₁', p₂', hp₂', h0 | h0 | ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, hr⟩⟩
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h0
rw [h0]
exact Or.inl hp₁'
· refine Or.inr ⟨p₂', hp₂', ?_⟩
rw [h0]
exact SameRay.zero_right _
· refine Or.inr ⟨(-r₁ / r₂) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₁') +ᵥ p₂', s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ h hp₁' hp₂',
Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨r₁, r₂, hr₁, hr₂, ?_⟩)⟩
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right x p₁ p₁']
linear_combination (norm := match_scalars <;> field_simp) hr
ring
· rintro (h' | ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩)
· exact wOppSide_of_left_mem y h'
· exact ⟨p₁, h, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem wOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.WOppSide x y ↔ y ∈ s ∨ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [wOppSide_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h]
constructor
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
· rintro (hy | ⟨p, hp, hr⟩)
· exact Or.inl hy
refine Or.inr ⟨p, hp, ?_⟩
rwa [SameRay.sameRay_comm, ← sameRay_neg_iff, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_left {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₁ : P} (h : p₁ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₂ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_left h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
intro hx
rw [or_iff_right hx]
|
theorem sOppSide_iff_exists_right {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y p₂ : P} (h : p₂ ∈ s) :
s.SOppSide x y ↔ x ∉ s ∧ y ∉ s ∧ ∃ p₁ ∈ s, SameRay R (x -ᵥ p₁) (p₂ -ᵥ y) := by
rw [SOppSide, and_comm, wOppSide_iff_exists_right h, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
and_congr_right_iff]
rintro _ hy
rw [or_iff_right hy]
theorem WSameSide.trans {s : AffineSubspace R P} {x y z : P} (hxy : s.WSameSide x y)
(hyz : s.WSameSide y z) (hy : y ∉ s) : s.WSameSide x z := by
rcases hxy with ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₂, hp₂, hxy⟩
rw [wSameSide_iff_exists_left hp₂, or_iff_right hy] at hyz
rcases hyz with ⟨p₃, hp₃, hyz⟩
refine ⟨p₁, hp₁, p₃, hp₃, hxy.trans hyz ?_⟩
refine fun h => False.elim ?_
rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
exact hy (h.symm ▸ hp₂)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Side.lean | 436 | 452 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth, Patrick Massot, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic
/-!
# Vector bundles
In this file we define (topological) vector bundles.
Let `B` be the base space, let `F` be a normed space over a normed field `R`, and let
`E : B → Type*` be a `FiberBundle` with fiber `F`, in which, for each `x`, the fiber `E x` is a
topological vector space over `R`.
To have a vector bundle structure on `Bundle.TotalSpace F E`, one should additionally have the
following properties:
* The bundle trivializations in the trivialization atlas should be continuous linear equivs in the
fibers;
* For any two trivializations `e`, `e'` in the atlas the transition function considered as a map
from `B` into `F →L[R] F` is continuous on `e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet` with respect to the operator
norm topology on `F →L[R] F`.
If these conditions are satisfied, we register the typeclass `VectorBundle R F E`.
We define constructions on vector bundles like pullbacks and direct sums in other files.
## Main Definitions
* `Trivialization.IsLinear`: a class stating that a trivialization is fiberwise linear on its base
set.
* `Trivialization.linearEquivAt` and `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt` are the
(continuous) linear fiberwise equivalences a trivialization induces.
* They have forward maps `Trivialization.linearMapAt` / `Trivialization.continuousLinearMapAt`
and inverses `Trivialization.symmₗ` / `Trivialization.symmL`. Note that these are all defined
everywhere, since they are extended using the zero function.
* `Trivialization.coordChangeL` is the coordinate change induced by two trivializations. It only
makes sense on the intersection of their base sets, but is extended outside it using the identity.
* Given a continuous (semi)linear map between `E x` and `E' y` where `E` and `E'` are bundles over
possibly different base sets, `ContinuousLinearMap.inCoordinates` turns this into a continuous
(semi)linear map between the chosen fibers of those bundles.
## Implementation notes
The implementation choices in the vector bundle definition are discussed in the "Implementation
notes" section of `Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Basic`.
## Tags
Vector bundle
-/
noncomputable section
open Bundle Set Topology
variable (R : Type*) {B : Type*} (F : Type*) (E : B → Type*)
section TopologicalVectorSpace
variable {F E}
variable [Semiring R] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalSpace B]
/-- A mixin class for `Pretrivialization`, stating that a pretrivialization is fiberwise linear with
respect to given module structures on its fibers and the model fiber. -/
protected class Pretrivialization.IsLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) : Prop where
linear : ∀ b ∈ e.baseSet, IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2
namespace Pretrivialization
variable (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) {x : TotalSpace F E} {b : B} {y : E b}
theorem linear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2 :=
Pretrivialization.IsLinear.linear b hb
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
/-- A fiberwise linear inverse to `e`. -/
@[simps!]
protected def symmₗ (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →ₗ[R] E b := by
refine IsLinearMap.mk' (e.symm b) ?_
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet
· exact (((e.linear R hb).mk' _).inverse (e.symm b) (e.symm_apply_apply_mk hb) fun v ↦
congr_arg Prod.snd <| e.apply_mk_symm hb v).isLinear
· rw [e.coe_symm_of_not_mem hb]
exact (0 : F →ₗ[R] E b).isLinear
/-- A pretrivialization for a vector bundle defines linear equivalences between the
fibers and the model space. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def linearEquivAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
E b ≃ₗ[R] F where
toFun y := (e ⟨b, y⟩).2
invFun := e.symm b
left_inv := e.symm_apply_apply_mk hb
right_inv v := by simp_rw [e.apply_mk_symm hb v]
map_add' v w := (e.linear R hb).map_add v w
map_smul' c v := (e.linear R hb).map_smul c v
open Classical in
/-- A fiberwise linear map equal to `e` on `e.baseSet`. -/
protected def linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →ₗ[R] F :=
if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet then e.linearEquivAt R b hb else 0
variable {R}
open Classical in
theorem coe_linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [Pretrivialization.linearMapAt]
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem coe_linearMapAt_of_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 := by
simp_rw [coe_linearMapAt, if_pos hb]
open Classical in
theorem linearMapAt_apply (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (y : E b) :
e.linearMapAt R b y = if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [coe_linearMapAt]
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = e.linearEquivAt R b hb :=
dif_pos hb
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_not_mem (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem linearMapAt_eq_zero (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem symmₗ_linearMapAt (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : E b) : e.symmₗ R b (e.linearMapAt R b y) = y := by
rw [e.linearMapAt_def_of_mem hb]
exact (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).left_inv y
theorem linearMapAt_symmₗ (e : Pretrivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) : e.linearMapAt R b (e.symmₗ R b y) = y := by
rw [e.linearMapAt_def_of_mem hb]
exact (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).right_inv y
end Pretrivialization
variable [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
/-- A mixin class for `Trivialization`, stating that a trivialization is fiberwise linear with
respect to given module structures on its fibers and the model fiber. -/
protected class Trivialization.IsLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) : Prop where
linear : ∀ b ∈ e.baseSet, IsLinearMap R fun x : E b => (e ⟨b, x⟩).2
namespace Trivialization
variable (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) {x : TotalSpace F E} {b : B} {y : E b}
protected theorem linear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
IsLinearMap R fun y : E b => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 :=
Trivialization.IsLinear.linear b hb
instance toPretrivialization.isLinear [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)]
[∀ x, Module R (E x)] [e.IsLinear R] : e.toPretrivialization.IsLinear R :=
{ (‹_› : e.IsLinear R) with }
variable [AddCommMonoid F] [Module R F] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
/-- A trivialization for a vector bundle defines linear equivalences between the
fibers and the model space. -/
def linearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
E b ≃ₗ[R] F :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearEquivAt R b hb
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivAt_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (v : E b) : e.linearEquivAt R b hb v = (e ⟨b, v⟩).2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivAt_symm_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (v : F) : (e.linearEquivAt R b hb).symm v = e.symm b v :=
rfl
variable (R) in
/-- A fiberwise linear inverse to `e`. -/
protected def symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →ₗ[R] E b :=
e.toPretrivialization.symmₗ R b
theorem coe_symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.symmₗ R b) = e.symm b :=
rfl
variable (R) in
/-- A fiberwise linear map equal to `e` on `e.baseSet`. -/
protected def linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →ₗ[R] F :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearMapAt R b
open Classical in
theorem coe_linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 :=
e.toPretrivialization.coe_linearMapAt b
theorem coe_linearMapAt_of_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ⇑(e.linearMapAt R b) = fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 := by
simp_rw [coe_linearMapAt, if_pos hb]
open Classical in
theorem linearMapAt_apply (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (y : E b) :
e.linearMapAt R b y = if b ∈ e.baseSet then (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 else 0 := by
rw [coe_linearMapAt]
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = e.linearEquivAt R b hb :=
dif_pos hb
theorem linearMapAt_def_of_not_mem (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∉ e.baseSet) : e.linearMapAt R b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
theorem symmₗ_linearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : E b) : e.symmₗ R b (e.linearMapAt R b y) = y :=
e.toPretrivialization.symmₗ_linearMapAt hb y
theorem linearMapAt_symmₗ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet)
(y : F) : e.linearMapAt R b (e.symmₗ R b y) = y :=
e.toPretrivialization.linearMapAt_symmₗ hb y
variable (R) in
open Classical in
/-- A coordinate change function between two trivializations, as a continuous linear equivalence.
Defined to be the identity when `b` does not lie in the base set of both trivializations. -/
def coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] (b : B) :
F ≃L[R] F :=
{ toLinearEquiv := if hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
then (e.linearEquivAt R b (hb.1 :)).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2)
else LinearEquiv.refl R F
continuous_toFun := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
· rw [dif_pos hb]
refine (e'.continuousOn.comp_continuous ?_ ?_).snd
· exact e.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (Continuous.prodMk_right b) fun y =>
mk_mem_prod hb.1 (mem_univ y)
· exact fun y => e'.mem_source.mpr hb.2
· rw [dif_neg hb]
exact continuous_id
continuous_invFun := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet
· rw [dif_pos hb]
refine (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous ?_ ?_).snd
· exact e'.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (Continuous.prodMk_right b) fun y =>
mk_mem_prod hb.2 (mem_univ y)
exact fun y => e.mem_source.mpr hb.1
· rw [dif_neg hb]
exact continuous_id }
theorem coe_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
⇑(coordChangeL R e e' b) = (e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2) :=
congr_arg (fun f : F ≃ₗ[R] F ↦ ⇑f) (dif_pos hb)
theorem coe_coordChangeL' (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
(coordChangeL R e e' b).toLinearEquiv =
(e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2) :=
LinearEquiv.coe_injective (coe_coordChangeL _ _ hb)
theorem symm_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e'.baseSet ∩ e.baseSet) : (e.coordChangeL R e' b).symm = e'.coordChangeL R e b := by
apply ContinuousLinearEquiv.toLinearEquiv_injective
rw [coe_coordChangeL' e' e hb, (coordChangeL R e e' b).symm_toLinearEquiv,
coe_coordChangeL' e e' hb.symm, LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_symm]
theorem coordChangeL_apply (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
coordChangeL R e e' b y = (e' ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩).2 :=
congr_fun (coe_coordChangeL e e' hb) y
theorem mk_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
(b, coordChangeL R e e' b y) = e' ⟨b, e.symm b y⟩ := by
ext
· rw [e.mk_symm hb.1 y, e'.coe_fst', e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
rw [e.proj_symm_apply' hb.1]
exact hb.2
· exact e.coordChangeL_apply e' hb y
theorem apply_symm_apply_eq_coordChangeL (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
[e'.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (v : F) :
e' (e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm (b, v)) = (b, e.coordChangeL R e' b v) := by
rw [e.mk_coordChangeL e' hb, e.mk_symm hb.1]
/-- A version of `Trivialization.coordChangeL_apply` that fully unfolds `coordChange`. The
right-hand side is ugly, but has good definitional properties for specifically defined
trivializations. -/
theorem coordChangeL_apply' (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) (y : F) :
coordChangeL R e e' b y = (e' (e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm (b, y))).2 := by
rw [e.coordChangeL_apply e' hb, e.mk_symm hb.1]
theorem coordChangeL_symm_apply (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R]
{b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
⇑(coordChangeL R e e' b).symm =
(e'.linearEquivAt R b hb.2).symm.trans (e.linearEquivAt R b hb.1) :=
congr_arg LinearEquiv.invFun (dif_pos hb)
end Trivialization
end TopologicalVectorSpace
section
namespace Bundle
/-- The zero section of a vector bundle -/
def zeroSection [∀ x, Zero (E x)] : B → TotalSpace F E := (⟨·, 0⟩)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem zeroSection_proj [∀ x, Zero (E x)] (x : B) : (zeroSection F E x).proj = x :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem zeroSection_snd [∀ x, Zero (E x)] (x : B) : (zeroSection F E x).2 = 0 :=
rfl
end Bundle
open Bundle
variable [NontriviallyNormedField R] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace R F] [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F E)]
[∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)] [FiberBundle F E]
/-- The space `Bundle.TotalSpace F E` (for `E : B → Type*` such that each `E x` is a topological
vector space) has a topological vector space structure with fiber `F` (denoted with
`VectorBundle R F E`) if around every point there is a fiber bundle trivialization which is linear
in the fibers. -/
class VectorBundle : Prop where
trivialization_linear' : ∀ (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e], e.IsLinear R
continuousOn_coordChange' :
∀ (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E)) [MemTrivializationAtlas e] [MemTrivializationAtlas e'],
ContinuousOn (fun b => Trivialization.coordChangeL R e e' b : B → F →L[R] F)
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet)
variable {F E}
instance (priority := 100) trivialization_linear [VectorBundle R F E] (e : Trivialization F (π F E))
[MemTrivializationAtlas e] : e.IsLinear R :=
VectorBundle.trivialization_linear' e
theorem continuousOn_coordChange [VectorBundle R F E] (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E))
[MemTrivializationAtlas e] [MemTrivializationAtlas e'] :
ContinuousOn (fun b => Trivialization.coordChangeL R e e' b : B → F →L[R] F)
(e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :=
VectorBundle.continuousOn_coordChange' e e'
namespace Trivialization
/-- Forward map of `Trivialization.continuousLinearEquivAt` (only propositionally equal),
defined everywhere (`0` outside domain). -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def continuousLinearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : E b →L[R] F :=
{ e.linearMapAt R b with
toFun := e.linearMapAt R b -- given explicitly to help `simps`
cont := by
rw [e.coe_linearMapAt b]
classical
refine continuous_if_const _ (fun hb => ?_) fun _ => continuous_zero
exact (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous (FiberBundle.totalSpaceMk_isInducing F E b).continuous
fun x => e.mem_source.mpr hb).snd }
/-- Backwards map of `Trivialization.continuousLinearEquivAt`, defined everywhere. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def symmL (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B) : F →L[R] E b :=
{ e.symmₗ R b with
toFun := e.symm b -- given explicitly to help `simps`
cont := by
by_cases hb : b ∈ e.baseSet
· rw [(FiberBundle.totalSpaceMk_isInducing F E b).continuous_iff]
exact e.continuousOn_symm.comp_continuous (.prodMk_right _) fun x ↦
mk_mem_prod hb (mem_univ x)
· refine continuous_zero.congr fun x => (e.symm_apply_of_not_mem hb x).symm }
variable {R}
theorem symmL_continuousLinearMapAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : E b) : e.symmL R b (e.continuousLinearMapAt R b y) = y :=
e.symmₗ_linearMapAt hb y
theorem continuousLinearMapAt_symmL (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (y : F) : e.continuousLinearMapAt R b (e.symmL R b y) = y :=
e.linearMapAt_symmₗ hb y
variable (R) in
/-- In a vector bundle, a trivialization in the fiber (which is a priori only linear)
is in fact a continuous linear equiv between the fibers and the model fiber. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply symm_apply]
def continuousLinearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : E b ≃L[R] F :=
{ e.toPretrivialization.linearEquivAt R b hb with
toFun := fun y => (e ⟨b, y⟩).2 -- given explicitly to help `simps`
invFun := e.symm b -- given explicitly to help `simps`
continuous_toFun := (e.continuousOn.comp_continuous
(FiberBundle.totalSpaceMk_isInducing F E b).continuous fun _ => e.mem_source.mpr hb).snd
continuous_invFun := (e.symmL R b).continuous }
theorem coe_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
(e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb : E b → F) = e.continuousLinearMapAt R b :=
(e.coe_linearMapAt_of_mem hb).symm
theorem symm_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {b : B}
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) : ((e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb).symm : F → E b) = e.symmL R b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem continuousLinearEquivAt_apply' (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
(x : TotalSpace F E) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
e.continuousLinearEquivAt R x.proj (e.mem_source.1 hx) x.2 = (e x).2 := rfl
variable (R)
theorem apply_eq_prod_continuousLinearEquivAt (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] (b : B)
(hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (z : E b) : e ⟨b, z⟩ = (b, e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb z) := by
ext
· refine e.coe_fst ?_
rw [e.source_eq]
exact hb
· simp only [coe_coe, continuousLinearEquivAt_apply]
protected theorem zeroSection (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R] {x : B}
(hx : x ∈ e.baseSet) : e (zeroSection F E x) = (x, 0) := by
simp_rw [zeroSection, e.apply_eq_prod_continuousLinearEquivAt R x hx 0, map_zero]
variable {R}
theorem symm_apply_eq_mk_continuousLinearEquivAt_symm (e : Trivialization F (π F E)) [e.IsLinear R]
(b : B) (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet) (z : F) :
e.toPartialHomeomorph.symm ⟨b, z⟩ = ⟨b, (e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb).symm z⟩ := by
have h : (b, z) ∈ e.target := by
rw [e.target_eq]
exact ⟨hb, mem_univ _⟩
apply e.injOn (e.map_target h)
· simpa only [e.source_eq, mem_preimage]
· simp_rw [e.right_inv h, coe_coe, e.apply_eq_prod_continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem comp_continuousLinearEquivAt_eq_coord_change (e e' : Trivialization F (π F E))
[e.IsLinear R] [e'.IsLinear R] {b : B} (hb : b ∈ e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) :
(e.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb.1).symm.trans (e'.continuousLinearEquivAt R b hb.2) =
coordChangeL R e e' b := by
ext v
rw [coordChangeL_apply e e' hb]
rfl
end Trivialization
/-! ### Constructing vector bundles -/
variable (B F)
/-- Analogous construction of `FiberBundleCore` for vector bundles. This
construction gives a way to construct vector bundles from a structure registering how
trivialization changes act on fibers. -/
structure VectorBundleCore (ι : Type*) where
baseSet : ι → Set B
isOpen_baseSet : ∀ i, IsOpen (baseSet i)
indexAt : B → ι
mem_baseSet_at : ∀ x, x ∈ baseSet (indexAt x)
coordChange : ι → ι → B → F →L[R] F
coordChange_self : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i, ∀ v, coordChange i i x v = v
continuousOn_coordChange : ∀ i j, ContinuousOn (coordChange i j) (baseSet i ∩ baseSet j)
coordChange_comp : ∀ i j k, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i ∩ baseSet j ∩ baseSet k, ∀ v,
(coordChange j k x) (coordChange i j x v) = coordChange i k x v
/-- The trivial vector bundle core, in which all the changes of coordinates are the
identity. -/
def trivialVectorBundleCore (ι : Type*) [Inhabited ι] : VectorBundleCore R B F ι where
baseSet _ := univ
isOpen_baseSet _ := isOpen_univ
indexAt := default
mem_baseSet_at x := mem_univ x
coordChange _ _ _ := ContinuousLinearMap.id R F
coordChange_self _ _ _ _ := rfl
coordChange_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ := rfl
continuousOn_coordChange _ _ := continuousOn_const
instance (ι : Type*) [Inhabited ι] : Inhabited (VectorBundleCore R B F ι) :=
⟨trivialVectorBundleCore R B F ι⟩
namespace VectorBundleCore
variable {R B F} {ι : Type*}
variable (Z : VectorBundleCore R B F ι)
/-- Natural identification to a `FiberBundleCore`. -/
@[simps (config := mfld_cfg)]
def toFiberBundleCore : FiberBundleCore ι B F :=
{ Z with
coordChange := fun i j b => Z.coordChange i j b
continuousOn_coordChange := fun i j =>
isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.continuous.comp_continuousOn
((Z.continuousOn_coordChange i j).prodMap continuousOn_id) }
-- TODO: restore coercion?
-- instance toFiberBundleCoreCoe : Coe (VectorBundleCore R B F ι) (FiberBundleCore ι B F) :=
-- ⟨toFiberBundleCore⟩
theorem coordChange_linear_comp (i j k : ι) :
∀ x ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j ∩ Z.baseSet k,
(Z.coordChange j k x).comp (Z.coordChange i j x) = Z.coordChange i k x :=
fun x hx => by
ext v
exact Z.coordChange_comp i j k x hx v
/-- The index set of a vector bundle core, as a convenience function for dot notation -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Index := ι
/-- The base space of a vector bundle core, as a convenience function for dot notation -/
@[nolint unusedArguments, reducible]
def Base := B
/-- The fiber of a vector bundle core, as a convenience function for dot notation and
typeclass inference -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Fiber : B → Type _ :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.Fiber
instance topologicalSpaceFiber (x : B) : TopologicalSpace (Z.Fiber x) :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.topologicalSpaceFiber x
instance addCommGroupFiber (x : B) : AddCommGroup (Z.Fiber x) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup F)
instance moduleFiber (x : B) : Module R (Z.Fiber x) :=
inferInstanceAs (Module R F)
/-- The projection from the total space of a fiber bundle core, on its base. -/
@[reducible, simp, mfld_simps]
protected def proj : TotalSpace F Z.Fiber → B :=
TotalSpace.proj
/-- The total space of the vector bundle, as a convenience function for dot notation.
It is by definition equal to `Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments, reducible]
protected def TotalSpace :=
Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber
/-- Local homeomorphism version of the trivialization change. -/
def trivChange (i j : ι) : PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F) :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.trivChange i j
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_trivChange_source (i j : ι) (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.trivChange i j).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.mem_trivChange_source i j p
/-- Topological structure on the total space of a vector bundle created from core, designed so
that all the local trivialization are continuous. -/
instance toTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Z.TotalSpace :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.toTopologicalSpace
variable (b : B) (a : F)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coordChange (i j : ι) : Z.toFiberBundleCore.coordChange i j b = Z.coordChange i j b :=
rfl
/-- One of the standard local trivializations of a vector bundle constructed from core, taken by
considering this in particular as a fiber bundle constructed from core. -/
def localTriv (i : ι) : Trivialization F (π F Z.Fiber) :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.localTriv i
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_apply {i : ι} (p : Z.TotalSpace) :
(Z.localTriv i) p = ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt p.1) i p.1 p.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The standard local trivializations of a vector bundle constructed from core are linear. -/
instance localTriv.isLinear (i : ι) : (Z.localTriv i).IsLinear R where
linear x _ :=
{ map_add := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_add, localTriv_apply, mfld_simps]
map_smul := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smul, localTriv_apply, mfld_simps] }
variable (i j : ι)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_localTriv_source (p : Z.TotalSpace) : p ∈ (Z.localTriv i).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem baseSet_at : Z.baseSet i = (Z.localTriv i).baseSet :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_localTriv_target (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.localTriv i).target ↔ p.1 ∈ (Z.localTriv i).baseSet :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.mem_localTriv_target i p
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_symm_fst (p : B × F) :
(Z.localTriv i).toPartialHomeomorph.symm p = ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt p.1) p.1 p.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_symm_apply {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i) (v : F) :
(Z.localTriv i).symm b v = Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt b) b v := by
apply (Z.localTriv i).symm_apply hb v
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_coordChange_eq {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j) (v : F) :
(Z.localTriv i).coordChangeL R (Z.localTriv j) b v = Z.coordChange i j b v := by
rw [Trivialization.coordChangeL_apply', localTriv_symm_fst, localTriv_apply, coordChange_comp]
exacts [⟨⟨hb.1, Z.mem_baseSet_at b⟩, hb.2⟩, hb]
/-- Preferred local trivialization of a vector bundle constructed from core, at a given point, as
a bundle trivialization -/
def localTrivAt (b : B) : Trivialization F (π F Z.Fiber) :=
Z.localTriv (Z.indexAt b)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTrivAt_def : Z.localTriv (Z.indexAt b) = Z.localTrivAt b :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_source_at : (⟨b, a⟩ : Z.TotalSpace) ∈ (Z.localTrivAt b).source := by
rw [localTrivAt, mem_localTriv_source]
exact Z.mem_baseSet_at b
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTrivAt_apply (p : Z.TotalSpace) : Z.localTrivAt p.1 p = ⟨p.1, p.2⟩ :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.localTrivAt_apply p
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTrivAt_apply_mk (b : B) (a : F) : Z.localTrivAt b ⟨b, a⟩ = ⟨b, a⟩ :=
Z.localTrivAt_apply _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_localTrivAt_baseSet : b ∈ (Z.localTrivAt b).baseSet :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.mem_localTrivAt_baseSet b
instance fiberBundle : FiberBundle F Z.Fiber :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.fiberBundle
instance vectorBundle : VectorBundle R F Z.Fiber where
trivialization_linear' := by
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply localTriv.isLinear
continuousOn_coordChange' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨i', rfl⟩
refine (Z.continuousOn_coordChange i i').congr fun b hb => ?_
ext v
exact Z.localTriv_coordChange_eq i i' hb v
/-- The projection on the base of a vector bundle created from core is continuous -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_proj : Continuous Z.proj :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.continuous_proj
/-- The projection on the base of a vector bundle created from core is an open map -/
theorem isOpenMap_proj : IsOpenMap Z.proj :=
Z.toFiberBundleCore.isOpenMap_proj
variable {i j}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_continuousLinearMapAt {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i) :
(Z.localTriv i).continuousLinearMapAt R b = Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b) i b := by
ext1 v
rw [(Z.localTriv i).continuousLinearMapAt_apply R, (Z.localTriv i).coe_linearMapAt_of_mem]
exacts [rfl, hb]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt {b₀ b : B}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).continuousLinearMapAt R b =
Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b) (Z.indexAt b₀) b :=
Z.localTriv_continuousLinearMapAt hb
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem localTriv_symmL {b : B} (hb : b ∈ Z.baseSet i) :
(Z.localTriv i).symmL R b = Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt b) b := by
ext1 v
rw [(Z.localTriv i).symmL_apply R, (Z.localTriv i).symm_apply]
exacts [rfl, hb]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_symmL {b₀ b : B} (hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).symmL R b = Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b₀) (Z.indexAt b) b :=
Z.localTriv_symmL hb
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_coordChange_eq {b₀ b₁ b : B}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).baseSet ∩ (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₁).baseSet)
(v : F) :
(trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₀).coordChangeL R (trivializationAt F Z.Fiber b₁) b v =
Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt b₀) (Z.indexAt b₁) b v :=
Z.localTriv_coordChange_eq _ _ hb v
end VectorBundleCore
end
/-! ### Vector prebundle -/
section
variable [NontriviallyNormedField R] [∀ x, AddCommMonoid (E x)] [∀ x, Module R (E x)]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace R F] [TopologicalSpace B] [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E x)]
| open TopologicalSpace
open VectorBundle
| Mathlib/Topology/VectorBundle/Basic.lean | 719 | 721 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Canonical
/-!
# Grothendieck Topology and Sheaves on the Category of Types
In this file we define a Grothendieck topology on the category of types,
and construct the canonical functor that sends a type to a sheaf over
the category of types, and make this an equivalence of categories.
Then we prove that the topology defined is the canonical topology.
-/
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- A Grothendieck topology associated to the category of all types.
A sieve is a covering iff it is jointly surjective. -/
def typesGrothendieckTopology : GrothendieckTopology (Type u) where
sieves α S := ∀ x : α, S fun _ : PUnit => x
top_mem' _ _ := trivial
pullback_stable' _ _ _ f hs x := hs (f x)
transitive' _ _ hs _ hr x := hr (hs x) PUnit.unit
/-- The discrete sieve on a type, which only includes arrows whose image is a subsingleton. -/
@[simps]
def discreteSieve (α : Type u) : Sieve α where
arrows _ f := ∃ x, ∀ y, f y = x
downward_closed := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ g => ⟨x, fun y => hx <| g y⟩
theorem discreteSieve_mem (α : Type u) : discreteSieve α ∈ typesGrothendieckTopology α :=
fun x => ⟨x, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- The discrete presieve on a type, which only includes arrows whose domain is a singleton. -/
def discretePresieve (α : Type u) : Presieve α :=
fun β _ => ∃ x : β, ∀ y : β, y = x
theorem generate_discretePresieve_mem (α : Type u) :
Sieve.generate (discretePresieve α) ∈ typesGrothendieckTopology α :=
fun x => ⟨PUnit, id, fun _ => x, ⟨PUnit.unit, fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩, rfl⟩
/-- The sheaf condition for `yoneda'`. -/
theorem Presieve.isSheaf_yoneda' {α : Type u} :
Presieve.IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology (yoneda.obj α) :=
fun β _ hs x hx =>
⟨fun y => x _ (hs y) PUnit.unit, fun γ f h =>
funext fun z => by
convert congr_fun (hx (𝟙 _) (fun _ => z) (hs <| f z) h rfl) PUnit.unit using 1,
fun f hf => funext fun y => by convert congr_fun (hf _ (hs y)) PUnit.unit⟩
/-- The sheaf condition for `yoneda'`. -/
theorem Presheaf.isSheaf_yoneda' {α : Type u} :
Presheaf.IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology (yoneda.obj α) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_of_type]
exact Presieve.isSheaf_yoneda'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-26")] alias isSheaf_yoneda' := Presieve.isSheaf_yoneda'
/-- The yoneda functor that sends a type to a sheaf over the category of types. -/
@[simps]
def yoneda' : Type u ⥤ Sheaf typesGrothendieckTopology (Type u) where
obj α := ⟨yoneda.obj α, Presheaf.isSheaf_yoneda'⟩
map f := ⟨yoneda.map f⟩
@[simp]
theorem yoneda'_comp : yoneda'.{u} ⋙ sheafToPresheaf _ _ = yoneda :=
rfl
open Opposite
/-- Given a presheaf `P` on the category of types, construct
a map `P(α) → (α → P(*))` for all type `α`. -/
def eval (P : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (α : Type u) (s : P.obj (op α)) (x : α) : P.obj (op PUnit) :=
P.map (↾fun _ => x).op s
open Presieve
/-- Given a sheaf `S` on the category of types, construct a map
`(α → S(*)) → S(α)` that is inverse to `eval`. -/
noncomputable def typesGlue (S : Type uᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hs : IsSheaf typesGrothendieckTopology S)
(α : Type u) (f : α → S.obj (op PUnit)) : S.obj (op α) :=
(hs.isSheafFor _ _ (generate_discretePresieve_mem α)).amalgamate
(fun _ g hg => S.map (↾fun _ => PUnit.unit).op <| f <| g <| Classical.choose hg)
fun β γ δ g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ h =>
(hs.isSheafFor _ _ (generate_discretePresieve_mem δ)).isSeparatedFor.ext fun ε g ⟨x, _⟩ => by
have : f₁ (Classical.choose hf₁) = f₂ (Classical.choose hf₂) :=
Classical.choose_spec hf₁ (g₁ <| g x) ▸
Classical.choose_spec hf₂ (g₂ <| g x) ▸ congr_fun h _
simp_rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, this, ← op_comp]
rfl
theorem eval_typesGlue {S hs α} (f) : eval.{u} S α (typesGlue S hs α f) = f := by
funext x
apply (IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ <| ⟨PUnit.unit, fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩).trans
convert FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply S _
|
theorem typesGlue_eval {S hs α} (s) : typesGlue.{u} S hs α (eval S α s) = s := by
apply (hs.isSheafFor _ _ (generate_discretePresieve_mem α)).isSeparatedFor.ext
intro β f hf
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Types.lean | 102 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
rw [eLpNorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
obtain hμ_top | hμ_ne_top := eq_or_ne (μ .univ) ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simpa [hμ, hc, hμ_ne_top, hμ_ne_top.lt_top, hc, hc'.lt_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_ne_top
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
theorem memLp_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [eLpNorm_const c h0 hμ]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc.lt_top (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp)
(measure_ne_top μ Set.univ))
theorem memLp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ :=
memLp_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const := memLp_const
theorem memLp_top_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) ∞ μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, by by_cases h : μ = 0 <;> simp [eLpNorm_const _, h, hc.lt_top]⟩
theorem memLp_top_const (c : E) : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) ∞ μ :=
memLp_top_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_top_const := memLp_top_const
theorem memLp_const_iff_enorm
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : ε''} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
simp_all [MemLp, aestronglyMeasurable_const,
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm hc hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
theorem memLp_const_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : E} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
memLp_const_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const_iff := memLp_const_iff
end Const
variable {f : α → F}
lemma eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
gcongr
lemma eLpNorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
dsimp [enorm]
gcongr
theorem eLpNorm'_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae hq (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_enorm_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ = ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ := by
have : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] (‖g ·‖ₑ ^ q) := hfg.mono fun x hx ↦ by simp [hx]
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_congr_ae this]
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ := by
have : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] (‖g ·‖ₑ ^ q) := hfg.mono fun x hx ↦ by simp [enorm, hx]
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_congr_ae this]
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_norm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_congr_enorm_ae (hfg.fun_comp _)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ = eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp enorm)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_enorm_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
theorem eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae h
· exact eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
theorem eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx)
· exact eLpNorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae' {ε' : Type*} [ENorm ε']
{f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae <| h.mono fun _x hx =>
hx.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (Real.norm_eq_abs _).symm.le)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_enorm {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae_real (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_enorm_bound {f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0∞} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le C hfC
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le (C : ℝ≥0∞) <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_enorm_bound {f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_enorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_enorm_bound {ε} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
{f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0∞} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖C‖ₑ := hfC.mono fun x hx ↦ hx.trans (Preorder.le_refl C)
refine (eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), one_div, enorm_eq_self, smul_eq_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖(C : ℝ)‖₊ := hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans_eq C.nnnorm_eq.symm
refine (eLpNorm_mono_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), C.enorm_eq, one_div, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * ENNReal.ofReal C := by
rw [← mul_comm]
exact eLpNorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound (hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ = ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem eLpNorm_indicator_sub_indicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) :
eLpNorm (s.indicator f - t.indicator f) p μ = eLpNorm ((s ∆ t).indicator f) p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae <| ae_of_all _ fun x ↦ by simp [Set.apply_indicator_symmDiff norm_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_norm {f : α → F} : eLpNorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_enorm {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖ₑ) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_norm (f : α → F) : eLpNorm (fun x => ‖f x‖) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => norm_norm _
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_enorm (f : α → ε) : eLpNorm (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ₑ) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => enorm_enorm _
theorem eLpNorm'_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (p q : ℝ) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ q) p μ = eLpNorm' f (p * q) μ ^ q := by
simp_rw [eLpNorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← one_div_mul_one_div, one_div,
mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ hq_pos.ne.symm, mul_one, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), mul_comm p,
← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hq_pos.le, ENNReal.rpow_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ q) p μ = eLpNorm f (p * ENNReal.ofReal q) μ ^ q := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos hq_pos]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp only [hp_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, ENNReal.top_mul', hq_pos.not_le,
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, if_false, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
have h_rpow : essSup (‖‖f ·‖ ^ q‖ₑ) μ = essSup (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) μ := by
congr
ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← enorm_norm]
rw [← Real.enorm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hq_pos.le]
rw [h_rpow]
have h_rpow_mono := ENNReal.strictMono_rpow_of_pos hq_pos
have h_rpow_surj := (ENNReal.rpow_left_bijective hq_pos.ne.symm).2
let iso := h_rpow_mono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ h_rpow_surj
exact (iso.essSup_apply (fun x => ‖f x‖ₑ) μ).symm
rw [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 hp_top, eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' _ _]
swap
· refine mul_ne_zero h0 ?_
rwa [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
swap; · exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hp_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hq_pos.le]
exact eLpNorm'_norm_rpow f p.toReal q hq_pos
theorem eLpNorm_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => hx ▸ rfl
theorem memLp_congr_ae [TopologicalSpace ε] {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
MemLp f p μ ↔ MemLp g p μ := by
simp only [MemLp, eLpNorm_congr_ae hfg, aestronglyMeasurable_congr hfg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_congr_ae := memLp_congr_ae
theorem MemLp.ae_eq [TopologicalSpace ε] {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (hf_Lp : MemLp f p μ) :
MemLp g p μ :=
(memLp_congr_ae hfg).1 hf_Lp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.ae_eq := MemLp.ae_eq
theorem MemLp.of_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hg : MemLp g p μ) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : MemLp f p μ :=
⟨hf, (eLpNorm_mono_ae hfg).trans_lt hg.eLpNorm_lt_top⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias Memℒp.of_le := MemLp.of_le
alias MemLp.mono := MemLp.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias Memℒp.mono := MemLp.mono
theorem MemLp.mono' {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : MemLp g p μ) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : MemLp f p μ :=
hg.mono hf <| h.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.mono' := MemLp.mono'
theorem MemLp.congr_norm {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : MemLp g p μ :=
hf.mono hg <| EventuallyEq.le <| EventuallyEq.symm h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.congr_norm := MemLp.congr_norm
theorem memLp_congr_norm {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : MemLp f p μ ↔ MemLp g p μ :=
⟨fun h2f => h2f.congr_norm hg h, fun h2g => h2g.congr_norm hf <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_congr_norm := memLp_congr_norm
theorem memLp_top_of_bound {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (C : ℝ)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : MemLp f ∞ μ :=
⟨hf, by
rw [eLpNorm_exponent_top]
exact eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound hfC⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_top_of_bound := memLp_top_of_bound
theorem MemLp.of_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (C : ℝ)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : MemLp f p μ :=
(memLp_const C).of_le hf (hfC.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.of_bound := MemLp.of_bound
theorem memLp_of_bounded [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{a b : ℝ} {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ Set.Icc a b)
(hX : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (p : ENNReal) : MemLp f p μ :=
have ha : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, a ≤ f x := h.mono fun ω h => h.1
have hb : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≤ b := h.mono fun ω h => h.2
(memLp_const (max |a| |b|)).mono' hX (by filter_upwards [ha, hb] with x using abs_le_max_abs_abs)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_of_bounded := memLp_of_bounded
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem eLpNorm'_mono_measure (f : α → ε) (hμν : ν ≤ μ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
eLpNorm' f q ν ≤ eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp_rw [eLpNorm']
gcongr
exact lintegral_mono' hμν le_rfl
| @[gcongr, mono]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_measure (f : α → ε) (hμν : ν ≪ μ) :
eLpNormEssSup f ν ≤ eLpNormEssSup f μ := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 609 | 611 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
/-!
# Hahn Series
If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of formal series over `Γ` with
coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered. With further structure on `R` and
`Γ`, we can add further structure on `HahnSeries Γ R`, with the most studied case being when `Γ` is
a linearly ordered abelian group and `R` is a field, in which case `HahnSeries Γ R` is a
valued field, with value group `Γ`.
These generalize Laurent series (with value group `ℤ`), and Laurent series are implemented that way
in the file `Mathlib/RingTheory/LaurentSeries.lean`.
## Main Definitions
* If `Γ` is ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of
formal series over `Γ` with coefficients in `R`, whose supports are partially well-ordered.
* `support x` is the subset of `Γ` whose coefficients are nonzero.
* `single a r` is the Hahn series which has coefficient `r` at `a` and zero otherwise.
* `orderTop x` is a minimal element of `WithTop Γ` where `x` has a nonzero
coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is `⊤` when `x = 0`.
* `order x` is a minimal element of `Γ` where `x` has a nonzero coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is zero
when `x = 0`.
* `map` takes each coefficient of a Hahn series to its target under a zero-preserving map.
* `embDomain` preserves coefficients, but embeds the index set `Γ` in a larger poset.
## References
- [J. van der Hoeven, *Operators on Generalized Power Series*][van_der_hoeven]
-/
open Finset Function
noncomputable section
/-- If `Γ` is linearly ordered and `R` has zero, then `HahnSeries Γ R` consists of
formal series over `Γ` with coefficients in `R`, whose supports are well-founded. -/
@[ext]
structure HahnSeries (Γ : Type*) (R : Type*) [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R] where
/-- The coefficient function of a Hahn Series. -/
coeff : Γ → R
isPWO_support' : (Function.support coeff).IsPWO
variable {Γ Γ' R S : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Zero
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : HahnSeries Γ R → Γ → R) :=
fun _ _ => HahnSeries.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj {x y : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = y.coeff ↔ x = y :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
/-- The support of a Hahn series is just the set of indices whose coefficients are nonzero.
Notably, it is well-founded. -/
nonrec def support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Set Γ :=
support x.coeff
@[simp]
theorem isPWO_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsPWO :=
x.isPWO_support'
@[simp]
theorem isWF_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsWF :=
x.isPWO_support.isWF
@[simp]
theorem mem_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (a : Γ) : a ∈ x.support ↔ x.coeff a ≠ 0 :=
Iff.refl _
instance : Zero (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨{ coeff := 0
isPWO_support' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨fun _ _ => HahnSeries.ext (by subsingleton)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero {a : Γ} : (0 : HahnSeries Γ R).coeff a = 0 :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias zero_coeff := coeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff' rfl
theorem ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
mt (fun x0 => (x0.symm ▸ coeff_zero : x.coeff g = 0)) h
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : support (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ∅ :=
Function.support_zero
@[simp]
nonrec theorem support_nonempty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support.Nonempty ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [support, support_nonempty_iff, Ne, coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support = ∅ ↔ x = 0 :=
Function.support_eq_empty_iff.trans coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
/-- The map of Hahn series induced by applying a zero-preserving map to each coefficient. -/
@[simps]
def map [Zero S] (x : HahnSeries Γ R) {F : Type*} [FunLike F R S] [ZeroHomClass F R S] (f : F) :
HahnSeries Γ S where
coeff g := f (x.coeff g)
isPWO_support' := x.isPWO_support.mono <| Function.support_comp_subset (ZeroHomClass.map_zero f) _
@[simp]
protected lemma map_zero [Zero S] (f : ZeroHom R S) :
(0 : HahnSeries Γ R).map f = 0 := by
ext; simp
/-- Change a HahnSeries with coefficients in HahnSeries to a HahnSeries on the Lex product. -/
def ofIterate [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R)) :
HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
coeff := fun g => coeff (coeff x g.1) g.2
isPWO_support' := by
refine Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.subsetProdLex ?_ ?_
· refine Set.IsPWO.mono x.isPWO_support' ?_
simp_rw [Set.image_subset_iff, support_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Function.mem_support]
exact fun _ ↦ ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
· exact fun a => by simpa [Function.mem_support, ne_eq] using (x.coeff a).isPWO_support'
@[simp]
lemma mk_eq_zero (f : Γ → R) (h) : HahnSeries.mk f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
simp_rw [HahnSeries.ext_iff, funext_iff, coeff_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
/-- Change a Hahn series on a lex product to a Hahn series with coefficients in a Hahn series. -/
def toIterate [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R) :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) where
coeff := fun g => {
coeff := fun g' => coeff x (g, g')
isPWO_support' := Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g
}
isPWO_support' := by
have h₁ : (Function.support fun g => HahnSeries.mk (fun g' => x.coeff (g, g'))
(Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g)) = Function.support
fun g => fun g' => x.coeff (g, g') := by
simp only [Function.support, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero]
rw [h₁, Function.support_curry' x.coeff]
exact Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.imageProdLex x.isPWO_support'
/-- The equivalence between iterated Hahn series and Hahn series on the lex product. -/
@[simps]
def iterateEquiv [PartialOrder Γ'] :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) ≃ HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
toFun := ofIterate
invFun := toIterate
left_inv := congrFun rfl
right_inv := congrFun rfl
open Classical in
/-- `single a r` is the Hahn series which has coefficient `r` at `a` and zero otherwise. -/
def single (a : Γ) : ZeroHom R (HahnSeries Γ R) where
toFun r :=
{ coeff := Pi.single a r
isPWO_support' := (Set.isPWO_singleton a).mono Pi.support_single_subset }
map_zero' := HahnSeries.ext (Pi.single_zero _)
variable {a b : Γ} {r : R}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_single_same (a : Γ) (r : R) : (single a r).coeff a = r := by
classical exact Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ => R) a r
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias single_coeff_same := coeff_single_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_single_of_ne (h : b ≠ a) : (single a r).coeff b = 0 := by
classical exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) h r
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias single_coeff_of_ne := coeff_single_of_ne
open Classical in
theorem coeff_single : (single a r).coeff b = if b = a then r else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")] alias single_coeff := coeff_single
@[simp]
theorem support_single_of_ne (h : r ≠ 0) : support (single a r) = {a} := by
classical exact Pi.support_single_of_ne h
theorem support_single_subset : support (single a r) ⊆ {a} := by
classical exact Pi.support_single_subset
theorem eq_of_mem_support_single {b : Γ} (h : b ∈ support (single a r)) : b = a :=
support_single_subset h
theorem single_eq_zero : single a (0 : R) = 0 :=
(single a).map_zero
theorem single_injective (a : Γ) : Function.Injective (single a : R → HahnSeries Γ R) :=
fun r s rs => by rw [← coeff_single_same a r, ← coeff_single_same a s, rs]
theorem single_ne_zero (h : r ≠ 0) : single a r ≠ 0 := fun con =>
h (single_injective a (con.trans single_eq_zero.symm))
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero_iff {a : Γ} {r : R} : single a r = 0 ↔ r = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff _ <| single_injective a
@[simp]
protected lemma map_single [Zero S] (f : ZeroHom R S) : (single a r).map f = single a (f r) := by
ext g
by_cases h : g = a <;> simp [h]
instance [Nonempty Γ] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨r, s, rs⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
inhabit Γ
refine ⟨single default r, single default s, fun con => rs ?_⟩
rw [← coeff_single_same (default : Γ) r, con, coeff_single_same]⟩
section Order
open Classical in
/-- The orderTop of a Hahn series `x` is a minimal element of `WithTop Γ` where `x` has a nonzero
coefficient if `x ≠ 0`, and is `⊤` when `x = 0`. -/
def orderTop (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : WithTop Γ :=
if h : x = 0 then ⊤ else x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_zero : orderTop (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_of_Subsingleton [Subsingleton R] {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.orderTop = ⊤ :=
(Subsingleton.eq_zero x) ▸ orderTop_zero
theorem orderTop_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
orderTop x = x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
dif_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero_iff_orderTop {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x ≠ 0 ↔ orderTop x ≠ ⊤ := by
constructor
· exact fun hx => Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun h ↦ h ≠ ⊤) (orderTop_of_ne hx)) WithTop.coe_ne_top
· contrapose!
simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
theorem orderTop_eq_top_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : orderTop x = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 := by
constructor
· contrapose!
exact ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp
· simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
theorem orderTop_eq_of_le {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (hg : g ∈ x.support)
| (hx : ∀ g' ∈ x.support, g ≤ g') : orderTop x = g := by
rw [orderTop_of_ne <| support_nonempty_iff.mp <| Set.nonempty_of_mem hg,
x.isWF_support.min_eq_of_le hg hx]
theorem untop_orderTop_of_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
WithTop.untop x.orderTop (ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp hx) =
x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Basic.lean | 264 | 270 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Adjoint of operators on Hilbert spaces
Given an operator `A : E →L[𝕜] F`, where `E` and `F` are Hilbert spaces, its adjoint
`adjoint A : F →L[𝕜] E` is the unique operator such that `⟪x, A y⟫ = ⟪adjoint A x, y⟫` for all
`x` and `y`.
We then use this to put a C⋆-algebra structure on `E →L[𝕜] E` with the adjoint as the star
operation.
This construction is used to define an adjoint for linear maps (i.e. not continuous) between
finite dimensional spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] (F →L[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a continuous
linear map, bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence.
* `LinearMap.adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] (F →ₗ[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a linear map between
finite-dimensional spaces, this time only as a conjugate-linear equivalence, since there is no
norm defined on these maps.
## Implementation notes
* The continuous conjugate-linear version `adjointAux` is only an intermediate
definition and is not meant to be used outside this file.
## Tags
adjoint
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-! ### Adjoint operator -/
open InnerProductSpace
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace G]
-- Note: made noncomputable to stop excess compilation
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
/-- The adjoint, as a continuous conjugate-linear map. This is only meant as an auxiliary
definition for the main definition `adjoint`, where this is bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric
equivalence. -/
noncomputable def adjointAux : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compSL _ _ _ _ _ ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E →L⋆[𝕜] E)).comp
(toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] F →L⋆[𝕜] NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E)
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_apply (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : F) :
adjointAux A x = ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E → E) ((toSesqForm A) x) :=
rfl
theorem adjointAux_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjointAux A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
rw [adjointAux_apply, toDual_symm_apply, toSesqForm_apply_coe, coe_comp', innerSL_apply_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem adjointAux_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) :
⟪x, adjointAux A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, adjointAux_inner_left, inner_conj_symm]
variable [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjointAux_adjointAux (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : adjointAux (adjointAux A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjointAux_inner_right, adjointAux_inner_left]
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_norm (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖adjointAux A‖ = ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
· nth_rw 1 [← adjointAux_adjointAux A]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
/-- The adjoint of a bounded operator `A` from a Hilbert space `E` to another Hilbert space `F`,
denoted as `A†`. -/
def adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective { adjointAux with norm_map' := adjointAux_norm } fun A =>
⟨adjointAux A, adjointAux_adjointAux A⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[InnerProduct] postfix:1000 "†" => ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint
open InnerProduct
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪(A†) y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_left A x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, (A†) y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_right A x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : A†† = A :=
adjointAux_adjointAux A
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →L[𝕜] G) (B : E →L[𝕜] F) : (A ∘L B)† = B† ∘L A† := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Function.comp_apply]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_left]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_right]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (B : F →L[𝕜] E) : A = B† ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_id :
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E) = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E := by
refine Eq.symm ?_
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
simp
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_subtypeL (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
U.subtypeL† = U.orthogonalProjection := by
symm
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
intro x u
rw [U.coe_inner, U.inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right,
U.orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self]
rfl
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_orthogonalProjection (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
(U.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] U)† = U.subtypeL := by
rw [← U.adjoint_subtypeL, adjoint_adjoint]
/-- `E →L[𝕜] E` is a star algebra with the adjoint as the star operation. -/
instance : Star (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint⟩
instance : InvolutiveStar (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_adjoint⟩
instance : StarMul (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_comp⟩
instance : StarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add adjoint⟩
instance : StarModule 𝕜 (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smulₛₗ adjoint⟩
theorem star_eq_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] E) : star A = A† :=
rfl
/-- A continuous linear operator is self-adjoint iff it is equal to its adjoint. -/
theorem isSelfAdjoint_iff' {A : E →L[𝕜] E} : IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem norm_adjoint_comp_self (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
‖ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A ∘L A‖ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
‖A† ∘L A‖ ≤ ‖A†‖ * ‖A‖ := opNorm_comp_le _ _
_ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· rw [← sq, ← Real.sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (norm_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (Real.sqrt_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
have :=
calc
re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ ≤ ‖(A† ∘L A) x‖ * ‖x‖ := re_inner_le_norm _ _
_ ≤ ‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
calc
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by rw [apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left]
_ ≤ √(‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt this
_ = √‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, Real.sqrt_mul (norm_nonneg _) (‖x‖ * ‖x‖),
Real.sqrt_mul_self (norm_nonneg x)]
/-- The C⋆-algebra instance when `𝕜 := ℂ` can be found in
`Analysis.CStarAlgebra.ContinuousLinearMap`. -/
instance : CStarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| Eq.symm <| norm_adjoint_comp_self x
theorem isAdjointPair_inner (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.IsAdjointPair (sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜)
(sesqFormOfInner : F →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) A (A†) := by
intro x y
simp only [sesqFormOfInner_apply_apply, adjoint_inner_left, coe_coe]
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-! ### Self-adjoint operators -/
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjoint_eq {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
hA
/-- Every self-adjoint operator on an inner product space is symmetric. -/
theorem isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw_mod_cast [← A.adjoint_inner_right, hA.adjoint_eq]
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem conj_adjoint {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : E →L[𝕜] F) :
IsSelfAdjoint (S ∘L T ∘L ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem adjoint_conj {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : F →L[𝕜] E) :
IsSelfAdjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S ∘L T ∘L S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} :
IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric :=
⟨fun hA => hA.isSymmetric, fun hA =>
ext fun x => ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => (A.adjoint_inner_left y x).symm ▸ (hA x y).symm⟩
theorem _root_.LinearMap.IsSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint {A : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hA : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric) : IsSelfAdjoint A := by
rwa [← ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric] at hA
/-- The orthogonal projection is self-adjoint. -/
theorem _root_.orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint (U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) :=
U.orthogonalProjection_isSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint
theorem conj_orthogonalProjection {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (U : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint
(U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection ∘L T ∘L U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [← (orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint U).adjoint_eq]
exact hT.adjoint_conj _
end IsSelfAdjoint
namespace LinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E]
variable {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E}
/-- The **Hellinger--Toeplitz theorem**: Construct a self-adjoint operator from an everywhere
defined symmetric operator. -/
def IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : selfAdjoint (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨⟨T, hT.continuous⟩, ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric.mpr hT⟩
theorem IsSymmetric.coe_toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : (hT.toSelfAdjoint : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) = T :=
rfl
theorem IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint_apply (hT : IsSymmetric T) {x : E} :
(hT.toSelfAdjoint : E → E) x = T x :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 G]
/- Porting note: Lean can't use `FiniteDimensional.complete` since it was generalized to topological
vector spaces. Use local instances instead. -/
/-- The adjoint of an operator from the finite-dimensional inner product space `E` to the
finite-dimensional inner product space `F`. -/
def adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] F →ₗ[𝕜] E :=
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
/- Note: Instead of the two instances above, the following works:
```
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
```
But removing one of the `have`s makes it fail. The reason is that `E` and `F` don't live
in the same universe, so the first `have` can no longer be used for `F` after its universe
metavariable has been assigned to that of `E`!
-/
((LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] F).trans
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint.toLinearEquiv).trans
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
theorem adjoint_toContinuousLinearMap (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (LinearMap.adjoint A) =
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
theorem adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.adjoint A = ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjoint A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_left _ x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, adjoint A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_right _ x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : LinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.adjoint A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjoint_inner_right, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (B : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.adjoint (A ∘ₗ B) = LinearMap.adjoint B ∘ₗ LinearMap.adjoint A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all basis vectors `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis {ι₁ : Type*} {ι₂ : Type*} (b₁ : Basis ι₁ 𝕜 E) (b₂ : Basis ι₂ 𝕜 F)
(A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ (i₁ : ι₁) (i₂ : ι₂), ⟪A (b₁ i₁), b₂ i₂⟫ = ⟪b₁ i₁, B (b₂ i₂)⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
refine Basis.ext b₁ fun i₁ => ?_
exact ext_inner_right_basis b₂ fun i₂ => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h i₁ i₂]
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis_left {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ i y, ⟪A (b i), y⟫ = ⟪b i, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => Basis.ext b fun i => ?_⟩
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [h i, adjoint_inner_left]
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis_right {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι 𝕜 F) (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ i x, ⟪A x, b i⟫ = ⟪x, B (b i)⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right_basis b fun i => by simp only [h i, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- `E →ₗ[𝕜] E` is a star algebra with the adjoint as the star operation. -/
instance : Star (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint⟩
instance : InvolutiveStar (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_adjoint⟩
instance : StarMul (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_comp⟩
instance : StarRing (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearEquiv.map_add adjoint⟩
instance : StarModule 𝕜 (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ adjoint⟩
theorem star_eq_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : star A = LinearMap.adjoint A :=
rfl
/-- A continuous linear operator is self-adjoint iff it is equal to its adjoint. -/
theorem isSelfAdjoint_iff' {A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} : IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ LinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isSymmetric_iff_isSelfAdjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : IsSymmetric A ↔ IsSelfAdjoint A := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff', IsSymmetric, ← LinearMap.eq_adjoint_iff]
exact eq_comm
theorem isAdjointPair_inner (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
IsAdjointPair (sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) (sesqFormOfInner : F →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) A
(LinearMap.adjoint A) := by
intro x y
simp only [sesqFormOfInner_apply_apply, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- The Gram operator T†T is symmetric. -/
theorem isSymmetric_adjoint_mul_self (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : IsSymmetric (LinearMap.adjoint T * T) := by
intro x y
simp [adjoint_inner_left, adjoint_inner_right]
/-- The Gram operator T†T is a positive operator. -/
theorem re_inner_adjoint_mul_self_nonneg (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) (x : E) :
0 ≤ re ⟪x, (LinearMap.adjoint T * T) x⟫ := by
simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, adjoint_inner_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
norm_cast
exact sq_nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem im_inner_adjoint_mul_self_eq_zero (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) (x : E) :
im ⟪x, LinearMap.adjoint T (T x)⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [Module.End.mul_apply, adjoint_inner_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
norm_cast
end LinearMap
section Unitary
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 H] [CompleteSpace H]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {K : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup K] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 K] [CompleteSpace K]
theorem inner_map_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self (u : H →L[𝕜] K) :
(∀ x y : H, ⟪u x, u y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜) ↔ adjoint u ∘L u = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ext fun x ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· refine ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y ↦ ?_
simpa [star_eq_adjoint, adjoint_inner_left] using h x y
· simp [← adjoint_inner_left, ← comp_apply, h]
theorem norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self (u : H →L[𝕜] K) :
(∀ x : H, ‖u x‖ = ‖x‖) ↔ adjoint u ∘L u = 1 := by
rw [LinearMap.norm_map_iff_inner_map_map u, u.inner_map_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self]
@[simp]
lemma _root_.LinearIsometryEquiv.adjoint_eq_symm (e : H ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] K) :
adjoint (e : H →L[𝕜] K) = e.symm :=
let e' := (e : H →L[𝕜] K)
calc
adjoint e' = adjoint e' ∘L (e' ∘L e.symm) := by
convert (adjoint e').comp_id.symm
ext
simp [e']
_ = e.symm := by
rw [← comp_assoc, norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self e' |>.mp e.norm_map]
exact (e.symm : K →L[𝕜] H).id_comp
@[simp]
lemma _root_.LinearIsometryEquiv.star_eq_symm (e : H ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] H) :
star (e : H →L[𝕜] H) = e.symm :=
e.adjoint_eq_symm
theorem norm_map_of_mem_unitary {u : H →L[𝕜] H} (hu : u ∈ unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) (x : H) :
‖u x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
-- Elaborates faster with this broken out https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11299
have := unitary.star_mul_self_of_mem hu
u.norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self.mpr this x
theorem inner_map_map_of_mem_unitary {u : H →L[𝕜] H} (hu : u ∈ unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) (x y : H) :
⟪u x, u y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 :=
-- Elaborates faster with this broken out https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11299
have := unitary.star_mul_self_of_mem hu
u.inner_map_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self.mpr this x y
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace unitary
theorem norm_map (u : unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) (x : H) : ‖(u : H →L[𝕜] H) x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
u.val.norm_map_of_mem_unitary u.property x
theorem inner_map_map (u : unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) (x y : H) :
⟪(u : H →L[𝕜] H) x, (u : H →L[𝕜] H) y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 :=
u.val.inner_map_map_of_mem_unitary u.property x y
/-- The unitary elements of continuous linear maps on a Hilbert space coincide with the linear
isometric equivalences on that Hilbert space. -/
noncomputable def linearIsometryEquiv : unitary (H →L[𝕜] H) ≃* (H ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] H) where
toFun u :=
{ (u : H →L[𝕜] H) with
norm_map' := norm_map u
invFun := ↑(star u)
left_inv := fun x ↦ congr($(star_mul_self u).val x)
right_inv := fun x ↦ congr($(mul_star_self u).val x) }
invFun e :=
{ val := e
property := by
let e' : (H →L[𝕜] H)ˣ :=
{ val := (e : H →L[𝕜] H)
inv := (e.symm : H →L[𝕜] H)
val_inv := by ext; simp
inv_val := by ext; simp }
exact IsUnit.mem_unitary_of_star_mul_self ⟨e', rfl⟩ <|
(e : H →L[𝕜] H).norm_map_iff_adjoint_comp_self.mp e.norm_map }
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext rfl
right_inv _ := LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ ↦ rfl
map_mul' u v := by ext; rfl
@[simp]
lemma linearIsometryEquiv_coe_apply (u : unitary (H →L[𝕜] H)) :
linearIsometryEquiv u = (u : H →L[𝕜] H) :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma linearIsometryEquiv_coe_symm_apply (e : H ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] H) :
linearIsometryEquiv.symm e = (e : H →L[𝕜] H) :=
rfl
end unitary
end Unitary
section Matrix
open Matrix LinearMap
variable {m n : Type*} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F]
variable (v₁ : OrthonormalBasis n 𝕜 E) (v₂ : OrthonormalBasis m 𝕜 F)
/-- The linear map associated to the conjugate transpose of a matrix corresponding to two
orthonormal bases is the adjoint of the linear map associated to the matrix. -/
lemma Matrix.toLin_conjTranspose (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) :
toLin v₂.toBasis v₁.toBasis Aᴴ = adjoint (toLin v₁.toBasis v₂.toBasis A) := by
refine eq_adjoint_iff_basis v₂.toBasis v₁.toBasis _ _ |>.mpr fun i j ↦ ?_
simp_rw [toLin_self]
simp [sum_inner, inner_smul_left, inner_sum, inner_smul_right,
orthonormal_iff_ite.mp v₁.orthonormal, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp v₂.orthonormal]
/-- The matrix associated to the adjoint of a linear map corresponding to two orthonormal bases
is the conjugate transpose of the matrix associated to the linear map. -/
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_adjoint (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
toMatrix v₂.toBasis v₁.toBasis (adjoint f) = (toMatrix v₁.toBasis v₂.toBasis f)ᴴ :=
toLin v₂.toBasis v₁.toBasis |>.injective <| by simp [toLin_conjTranspose]
/-- The star algebra equivalence between the linear endomorphisms of finite-dimensional inner
product space and square matrices induced by the choice of an orthonormal basis. -/
@[simps]
def LinearMap.toMatrixOrthonormal : (E →ₗ[𝕜] E) ≃⋆ₐ[𝕜] Matrix n n 𝕜 :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrix v₁.toBasis v₁.toBasis with
map_mul' := LinearMap.toMatrix_mul v₁.toBasis
map_star' := LinearMap.toMatrix_adjoint v₁ v₁ }
lemma LinearMap.toMatrixOrthonormal_apply_apply (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) (i j : n) :
toMatrixOrthonormal v₁ f i j = ⟪v₁ i, f (v₁ j)⟫_𝕜 :=
calc
_ = v₁.repr (f (v₁ j)) i := f.toMatrix_apply ..
_ = ⟪v₁ i, f (v₁ j)⟫_𝕜 := v₁.repr_apply_apply ..
lemma LinearMap.toMatrixOrthonormal_reindex (e : n ≃ m) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
toMatrixOrthonormal (v₁.reindex e) f = (toMatrixOrthonormal v₁ f).reindex e e :=
Matrix.ext fun i j =>
calc toMatrixOrthonormal (v₁.reindex e) f i j
_ = (v₁.reindex e).repr (f (v₁.reindex e j)) i := f.toMatrix_apply ..
_ = v₁.repr (f (v₁ (e.symm j))) (e.symm i) := by simp
_ = toMatrixOrthonormal v₁ f (e.symm i) (e.symm j) := Eq.symm (f.toMatrix_apply ..)
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The adjoint of the linear map associated to a matrix is the linear map associated to the
conjugate transpose of that matrix. -/
theorem Matrix.toEuclideanLin_conjTranspose_eq_adjoint (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) :
Matrix.toEuclideanLin A.conjTranspose = LinearMap.adjoint (Matrix.toEuclideanLin A) :=
A.toLin_conjTranspose (EuclideanSpace.basisFun n 𝕜) (EuclideanSpace.basisFun m 𝕜)
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Adjoint.lean | 620 | 624 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# Results about big operators over intervals
We prove results about big operators over intervals.
-/
open Nat
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [CommMonoid M] {f : α → M} {a b : α}
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f b * ∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x) * f b = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc h]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ioc h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioc_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc h]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Iio_mul_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
[CommMonoid M]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag (f : α → α → M) :
∏ i, ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, f j i * f i j = ∏ i, ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, f j i := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_disjUnion_Iio, prod_disjUnion, prod_mul_distrib]
congr 1
rw [prod_sigma', prod_sigma']
refine prod_nbij' (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp
end LinearOrder
section Generic
variable [CommMonoid M] {s₂ s₁ s : Finset α} {a : α} {g f : α → M}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add' [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (x + c)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
rw [← map_add_right_Ico, prod_map]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (c + x)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
convert prod_Ico_add' f a b c using 2
rw [add_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_Ico_add_right_sub_eq [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] (a b c : α) :
∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f (x - c) = ∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x := by
simp only [← map_add_right_Ico, prod_map, addRightEmbedding_apply, add_tsub_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ico a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k) * f b := by
rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hab, prod_insert right_not_mem_Ico, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot {a b : ℕ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k = f a * ∏ k ∈ Ico (a + 1) b, f k := by
have ha : a ∉ Ico (a + 1) b := by simp
rw [← prod_insert ha, Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left hab]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ico m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ico n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ico m k, f i :=
Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hmn hnk ▸ Eq.symm (prod_union (Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive m n k))
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ioc m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ioc n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ioc m k, f i := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc hmn hnk, prod_union]
apply disjoint_left.2 fun x hx h'x => _
intros x hx h'x
exact lt_irrefl _ ((mem_Ioc.1 h'x).1.trans_le (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ioc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ioc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← prod_Ioc_consecutive _ hab (Nat.le_succ b), Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Icc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b + 1) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Icc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Icc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.Ico_succ_right, prod_Ico_succ_top hab, Nat.Ico_succ_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_mul_prod_Ico (f : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) * ∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k) = ∏ k ∈ range n, f k :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ prod_Ico_consecutive f m.zero_le h
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_eq_mul_Ico (f : ℕ → M) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
∏ x ∈ Finset.range n, f x = f 0 * ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 n, f x :=
Finset.range_eq_Ico ▸ Finset.prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot hn f
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) * (∏ k ∈ range m, f k)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq.2 <| by (rw [mul_comm]; exact prod_range_mul_prod_Ico f h)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_div {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range m, f k := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv f h
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] {f : ℕ → α} {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k) = ∏ k ∈ range m with n ≤ k, f k := by
rw [← prod_Ico_eq_div f hnm]
congr
apply Finset.ext
simp only [mem_Ico, mem_filter, mem_range, *]
tauto
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i ≤ j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico i b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a (j + 1), f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
omega
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i < j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico (i + 1) b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a j, f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
omega
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_prod_range (f : ℕ → M) (m n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = ∏ k ∈ range (n - m), f (m + k) := by
by_cases h : m ≤ n
· rw [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, prod_Ico_add, zero_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· replace h : n ≤ m := le_of_not_ge h
rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h, range_zero, prod_empty, prod_empty]
theorem prod_Ico_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n + 1) :
(∏ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∏ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j := by
have : ∀ i < m, i ≤ n := by
intro i hi
exact (add_le_add_iff_right 1).1 (le_trans (Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le.1 hi) h)
rcases lt_or_le k m with hkm | hkm
· rw [← Nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (this _ hkm)]
refine (prod_image ?_).symm
simp only [mem_Ico]
rintro i ⟨_, im⟩ j ⟨_, jm⟩ Hij
rw [← tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ im), Hij, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ jm)]
· have : n + 1 - k ≤ n + 1 - m := by
rw [tsub_le_tsub_iff_left h]
exact hkm
simp only [hkm, Ico_eq_empty_of_le, prod_empty, tsub_le_iff_right, Ico_eq_empty_of_le
this]
theorem sum_Ico_reflect {δ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m ≤ n + 1) : (∑ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∑ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j :=
@prod_Ico_reflect (Multiplicative δ) _ f k m n h
theorem prod_range_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ j ∈ range n, f (n - 1 - j)) = ∏ j ∈ range n, f j := by
cases n
· simp
· simp only [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero]
rw [prod_Ico_reflect _ _ le_rfl]
simp
theorem sum_range_reflect {δ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ j ∈ range n, f (n - 1 - j)) = ∑ j ∈ range n, f j :=
@prod_range_reflect (Multiplicative δ) _ f n
@[simp]
theorem prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, (∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1), x) = n !
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [prod_Ico_succ_top <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.zero_le n, Nat.factorial_succ,
prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial n, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, (∏ x ∈ range n, (x + 1)) = n !
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by simp [factorial, Finset.range_succ, prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial n]
section GaussSum
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
theorem sum_range_id_mul_two (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, i) * 2 = n * (n - 1) :=
calc
(∑ i ∈ range n, i) * 2 = (∑ i ∈ range n, i) + ∑ i ∈ range n, (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [sum_range_reflect (fun i => i) n, mul_two]
_ = ∑ i ∈ range n, (i + (n - 1 - i)) := sum_add_distrib.symm
_ = ∑ _ ∈ range n, (n - 1) :=
sum_congr rfl fun _ hi => add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| mem_range.1 hi
_ = n * (n - 1) := by rw [sum_const, card_range, Nat.nsmul_eq_mul]
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
theorem sum_range_id (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, i = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
rw [← sum_range_id_mul_two n, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ zero_lt_two]
end GaussSum
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_diag_flip (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∏ m ∈ range n, ∏ k ∈ range (m + 1), f k (m - k)) =
∏ m ∈ range n, ∏ k ∈ range (n - m), f m k := by
rw [prod_sigma', prod_sigma']
refine prod_nbij' (fun a ↦ ⟨a.2, a.1 - a.2⟩) (fun a ↦ ⟨a.1 + a.2, a.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual only [mem_sigma, mem_range, lt_tsub_iff_left,
Nat.lt_succ_iff, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, Nat.zero_le, and_true, and_imp, imp_self,
| implies_true, Sigma.forall, forall_const, add_tsub_cancel_of_le, Sigma.mk.inj_iff,
add_tsub_cancel_left, heq_eq_eq]
exact fun a b han hba ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt hba han
end Generic
section Nat
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Intervals.lean | 274 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
|
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 116 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.bal.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.bal
· exact t_r_valid.bal
theorem map.valid {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (map f t) :=
(Valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem Valid'.erase_aux [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ Raised (erase x t).size t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simpa [erase, Raised]
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
simp only [erase, size_node]
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
cases cmpLE x t_x <;> rw [h.sz.1]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceR t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable]
repeat apply Raised.add_right
exact t_l_size
left; exists t_l.size; exact And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1
· have h_glue := Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1
obtain ⟨h_glue_valid, h_glue_sized⟩ := h_glue
constructor
· exact h_glue_valid
· right; rw [h_glue_sized]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceL h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable]
apply Raised.add_right
apply Raised.add_left
exact t_r_size
right; exists t_r.size; exact And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1
theorem erase.valid [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (erase x t) :=
(Valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [DecidableLE α] {x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : size (erase x t) = size t - 1 := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| | nil =>
contradiction
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 610 | 613 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
/-!
# Theorems about invertible elements in rings
-/
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-- `-⅟a` is the inverse of `-a` -/
def invertibleNeg [Mul R] [One R] [HasDistribNeg R] (a : R) [Invertible a] : Invertible (-a) :=
⟨-⅟ a, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem invOf_neg [Monoid R] [HasDistribNeg R] (a : R) [Invertible a] [Invertible (-a)] :
⅟ (-a) = -⅟ a :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem one_sub_invOf_two [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] : 1 - (⅟ 2 : R) = ⅟ 2 :=
(isUnit_of_invertible (2 : R)).mul_right_inj.1 <| by
rw [mul_sub, mul_invOf_self, mul_one, ← one_add_one_eq_two, add_sub_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem invOf_two_add_invOf_two [NonAssocSemiring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] :
(⅟ 2 : R) + (⅟ 2 : R) = 1 := by rw [← two_mul, mul_invOf_self]
theorem pos_of_invertible_cast [NonAssocSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) [Invertible (n : R)] :
0 < n :=
Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero fun h => Invertible.ne_zero (n : R) (h ▸ Nat.cast_zero)
theorem invOf_add_invOf [Semiring R] (a b : R) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] :
⅟a + ⅟b = ⅟a * (a + b) * ⅟b := by
rw [mul_add, invOf_mul_self, add_mul, one_mul, mul_assoc, mul_invOf_self, mul_one, add_comm]
/-- A version of `inv_sub_inv'` for `invOf`. -/
theorem invOf_sub_invOf [Ring R] (a b : R) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] :
⅟a - ⅟b = ⅟a * (b - a) * ⅟b := by
rw [mul_sub, invOf_mul_self, sub_mul, one_mul, mul_assoc, mul_invOf_self, mul_one]
/-- A version of `inv_add_inv'` for `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem Ring.inverse_add_inverse [Semiring R] {a b : R} (h : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b) :
Ring.inverse a + Ring.inverse b = Ring.inverse a * (a + b) * Ring.inverse b := by
by_cases ha : IsUnit a
· have hb := h.mp ha
obtain ⟨ia⟩ := ha.nonempty_invertible
obtain ⟨ib⟩ := hb.nonempty_invertible
simp_rw [inverse_invertible, invOf_add_invOf]
· have hb := h.not.mp ha
simp [inverse_non_unit, ha, hb]
/-- A version of `inv_sub_inv'` for `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem Ring.inverse_sub_inverse [Ring R] {a b : R} (h : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b) :
Ring.inverse a - Ring.inverse b = Ring.inverse a * (b - a) * Ring.inverse b := by
by_cases ha : IsUnit a
· have hb := h.mp ha
obtain ⟨ia⟩ := ha.nonempty_invertible
| obtain ⟨ib⟩ := hb.nonempty_invertible
simp_rw [inverse_invertible, invOf_sub_invOf]
· have hb := h.not.mp ha
simp [inverse_non_unit, ha, hb]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Invertible.lean | 65 | 73 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Basic
/-!
# Split a box along one or more hyperplanes
## Main definitions
A hyperplane `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` splits a rectangular box `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` into two
smaller boxes. If `a ∉ Ioo (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then one of these boxes is empty, so it is not a
box in the sense of `BoxIntegral.Box`.
We introduce the following definitions.
* `BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower I i a` and `BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper I i a` are these boxes (as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`);
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.split I i a` is the partition of `I` made of these two boxes (or of one
box `I` if one of these boxes is empty);
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany I s`, where `s : Finset (ι × ℝ)` is a finite set of
hyperplanes `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` encoded as pairs `(i, a)`, is the partition of `I` made by
cutting it along all the hyperplanes in `s`.
## Main results
The main result `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.exists_iUnion_eq_diff` says that any prepartition `π` of
`I` admits a prepartition `π'` of `I` that covers exactly `I \ π.iUnion`. One of these prepartitions
is available as `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.compl`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition, hyperplane
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Filter
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι M : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace Box
variable {I : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ} {y : ι → ℝ}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`. -/
def splitLower (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' I.lower (update I.upper i (min x (I.upper i)))
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitLower : (splitLower I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
rw [splitLower, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and, ← Pi.le_def,
le_update_iff, le_min_iff, and_assoc, and_forall_ne (p := fun j => y j ≤ upper I j) i, mem_def]
rw [and_comm (a := y i ≤ x)]
theorem splitLower_le : I.splitLower i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitLower i x = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
classical
rw [splitLower, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.upper fun j y => y ≤ I.lower j]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_self : I.splitLower i x = I ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
simp [splitLower, update_eq_iff]
theorem splitLower_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, I.lower j < update I.upper i x j :=
(forall_update_iff I.upper fun j y => I.lower j < y).2
⟨h.1, fun _ _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitLower i x = (⟨I.lower, update I.upper i x, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [splitLower, mk'_eq_coe, min_eq_left h.2.le,
update, and_self]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | x < y i}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`. -/
def splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' (update I.lower i (max x (I.lower i))) I.upper
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitUpper : (splitUpper I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
classical
rw [splitUpper, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and,
forall_update_iff I.lower fun j z => z < y j, max_lt_iff, and_assoc (a := x < y i),
and_forall_ne (p := fun j => lower I j < y j) i, mem_def]
exact and_comm
theorem splitUpper_le : I.splitUpper i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem splitUpper_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitUpper i x = ⊥ ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
classical
rw [splitUpper, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.lower fun j y => I.upper j ≤ y]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
@[simp]
theorem splitUpper_eq_self : I.splitUpper i x = I ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
simp [splitUpper, update_eq_iff]
theorem splitUpper_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, update I.lower i x j < I.upper j :=
(forall_update_iff I.lower fun j y => y < I.upper j).2
⟨h.2, fun _ _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitUpper i x = (⟨update I.lower i x, I.upper, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [splitUpper, mk'_eq_coe, max_eq_left h.1.le,
update, and_self]
theorem disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
Disjoint (I.splitLower i x) (I.splitUpper i x) := by
rw [← disjoint_withBotCoe, coe_splitLower, coe_splitUpper]
refine (Disjoint.inf_left' _ ?_).inf_right' _
rw [Set.disjoint_left]
exact fun y (hle : y i ≤ x) hlt => not_lt_of_le hle hlt
theorem splitLower_ne_splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
I.splitLower i x ≠ I.splitUpper i x := by
rcases le_or_lt x (I.lower i) with h | _
· rw [splitUpper_eq_self.2 h, splitLower_eq_bot.2 h]
exact WithBot.bot_ne_coe
· refine (disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper I i x).ne ?_
rwa [Ne, splitLower_eq_bot, not_le]
end Box
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ}
open scoped Classical in
/-- The partition of `I : Box ι` into the boxes `I ∩ {y | y ≤ x i}` and `I ∩ {y | x i < y}`.
One of these boxes can be empty, then this partition is just the single-box partition `⊤`. -/
def split (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : Prepartition I :=
ofWithBot {I.splitLower i x, I.splitUpper i x}
(by
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
rintro J (rfl | rfl)
exacts [Box.splitLower_le, Box.splitUpper_le])
(by
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Finset.coe_singleton, true_and, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
pairwise_insert_of_symmetric symmetric_disjoint, pairwise_singleton]
rintro J rfl -
exact I.disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper i x)
@[simp]
theorem mem_split_iff : J ∈ split I i x ↔ ↑J = I.splitLower i x ∨ ↑J = I.splitUpper i x := by
simp [split]
theorem mem_split_iff' : J ∈ split I i x ↔
(J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } ∨ (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
simp [mem_split_iff, ← Box.withBotCoe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_split (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : (split I i x).iUnion = I := by
simp [split, ← inter_union_distrib_left, ← setOf_or, le_or_lt]
theorem isPartitionSplit (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : IsPartition (split I i x) :=
isPartition_iff_iUnion_eq.2 <| iUnion_split I i x
theorem sum_split_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ (split I i x).boxes, f J) =
(I.splitLower i x).elim' 0 f + (I.splitUpper i x).elim' 0 f := by
classical
rw [split, sum_ofWithBot, Finset.sum_pair (I.splitLower_ne_splitUpper i x)]
/-- If `x ∉ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then the hyperplane `{y | y i = x}` does not split `I`. -/
theorem split_of_not_mem_Ioo (h : x ∉ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) : split I i x = ⊤ := by
refine ((isPartitionTop I).eq_of_boxes_subset fun J hJ => ?_).symm
rcases mem_top.1 hJ with rfl; clear hJ
rw [mem_boxes, mem_split_iff]
rw [mem_Ioo, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
cases h <;> [right; left]
· rwa [eq_comm, Box.splitUpper_eq_self]
· rwa [eq_comm, Box.splitLower_eq_self]
theorem coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le {y : ι → ℝ} (h₁ : J ∈ split I i x) (h₂ : y ∈ J)
(h₃ : y i ≤ x) : (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
refine (mem_split_iff'.1 h₁).resolve_right fun H => ?_
rw [← Box.mem_coe, H] at h₂
exact h₃.not_lt h₂.2
theorem coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem {y : ι → ℝ} (h₁ : J ∈ split I i x) (h₂ : y ∈ J)
(h₃ : x < y i) : (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
refine (mem_split_iff'.1 h₁).resolve_left fun H => ?_
rw [← Box.mem_coe, H] at h₂
exact h₃.not_le h₂.2
@[simp]
theorem restrict_split (h : I ≤ J) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : (split J i x).restrict I = split I i x := by
refine ((isPartitionSplit J i x).restrict h).eq_of_boxes_subset ?_
simp only [Finset.subset_iff, mem_boxes, mem_restrict', exists_prop, mem_split_iff']
have : ∀ s, (I ∩ s : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J := fun s => inter_subset_left.trans h
rintro J₁ ⟨J₂, H₂ | H₂, H₁⟩ <;> [left; right] <;>
simp [H₁, H₂, inter_left_comm (I : Set (ι → ℝ)), this]
theorem inf_split (π : Prepartition I) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
π ⊓ split I i x = π.biUnion fun J => split J i x :=
biUnion_congr_of_le rfl fun _ hJ => restrict_split hJ i x
/-- Split a box along many hyperplanes `{y | y i = x}`; each hyperplane is given by the pair
`(i x)`. -/
def splitMany (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) : Prepartition I :=
s.inf fun p => split I p.1 p.2
@[simp]
theorem splitMany_empty (I : Box ι) : splitMany I ∅ = ⊤ :=
Finset.inf_empty
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem splitMany_insert (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) (p : ι × ℝ) :
splitMany I (insert p s) = splitMany I s ⊓ split I p.1 p.2 := by
rw [splitMany, Finset.inf_insert, inf_comm, splitMany]
theorem splitMany_le_split (I : Box ι) {s : Finset (ι × ℝ)} {p : ι × ℝ} (hp : p ∈ s) :
splitMany I s ≤ split I p.1 p.2 :=
Finset.inf_le hp
theorem isPartition_splitMany (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) : IsPartition (splitMany I s) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [splitMany_empty, isPartitionTop]) fun a s _ hs => by
simpa only [splitMany_insert, inf_split] using hs.biUnion fun J _ => isPartitionSplit _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_splitMany (I : Box ι) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) : (splitMany I s).iUnion = I :=
(isPartition_splitMany I s).iUnion_eq
theorem inf_splitMany {I : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) (s : Finset (ι × ℝ)) :
π ⊓ splitMany I s = π.biUnion fun J => splitMany J s := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with p s _ ihp
· simp
· simp_rw [splitMany_insert, ← inf_assoc, ihp, inf_split, biUnion_assoc]
open scoped Classical in
/-- Let `s : Finset (ι × ℝ)` be a set of hyperplanes `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = r}` in `ι → ℝ` encoded as
pairs `(i, r)`. Suppose that this set contains all faces of a box `J`. The hyperplanes of `s` split
a box `I` into subboxes. Let `Js` be one of them. If `J` and `Js` have nonempty intersection, then
`Js` is a subbox of `J`. -/
theorem not_disjoint_imp_le_of_subset_of_mem_splitMany {I J Js : Box ι} {s : Finset (ι × ℝ)}
(H : ∀ i, {(i, J.lower i), (i, J.upper i)} ⊆ s) (HJs : Js ∈ splitMany I s)
(Hn : ¬Disjoint (J : WithBot (Box ι)) Js) : Js ≤ J := by
simp only [Finset.insert_subset_iff, Finset.singleton_subset_iff] at H
rcases Box.not_disjoint_coe_iff_nonempty_inter.mp Hn with ⟨x, hx, hxs⟩
refine fun y hy i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rcases splitMany_le_split I (H i).1 HJs with ⟨Jl, Hmem : Jl ∈ split I i (J.lower i), Hle⟩
have := Hle hxs
rw [← Box.coe_subset_coe, coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_lt_mem Hmem this (hx i).1] at Hle
exact (Hle hy).2
· rcases splitMany_le_split I (H i).2 HJs with ⟨Jl, Hmem : Jl ∈ split I i (J.upper i), Hle⟩
have := Hle hxs
rw [← Box.coe_subset_coe, coe_eq_of_mem_split_of_mem_le Hmem this (hx i).2] at Hle
exact (Hle hy).2
section Finite
variable [Finite ι]
/-- Let `s` be a finite set of boxes in `ℝⁿ = ι → ℝ`. Then there exists a finite set `t₀` of
hyperplanes (namely, the set of all hyperfaces of boxes in `s`) such that for any `t ⊇ t₀`
and any box `I` in `ℝⁿ` the following holds. The hyperplanes from `t` split `I` into subboxes.
Let `J'` be one of them, and let `J` be one of the boxes in `s`. If these boxes have a nonempty
intersection, then `J' ≤ J`. -/
theorem eventually_not_disjoint_imp_le_of_mem_splitMany (s : Finset (Box ι)) :
∀ᶠ t : Finset (ι × ℝ) in atTop, ∀ (I : Box ι), ∀ J ∈ s, ∀ J' ∈ splitMany I t,
¬Disjoint (J : WithBot (Box ι)) J' → J' ≤ J := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
refine eventually_atTop.2
⟨s.biUnion fun J => Finset.univ.biUnion fun i => {(i, J.lower i), (i, J.upper i)},
fun t ht I J hJ J' hJ' => not_disjoint_imp_le_of_subset_of_mem_splitMany (fun i => ?_) hJ'⟩
exact fun p hp =>
ht (Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, hp⟩⟩)
theorem eventually_splitMany_inf_eq_filter (π : Prepartition I) :
∀ᶠ t : Finset (ι × ℝ) in atTop,
π ⊓ splitMany I t = (splitMany I t).filter fun J => ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion := by
refine (eventually_not_disjoint_imp_le_of_mem_splitMany π.boxes).mono fun t ht => ?_
refine le_antisymm ((biUnion_le_iff _).2 fun J hJ => ?_) (le_inf (fun J hJ => ?_) (filter_le _ _))
· refine ofWithBot_mono ?_
simp only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop, mem_boxes, mem_filter]
rintro _ ⟨J₁, h₁, rfl⟩ hne
refine ⟨_, ⟨J₁, ⟨h₁, Subset.trans ?_ (π.subset_iUnion hJ)⟩, rfl⟩, le_rfl⟩
exact ht I J hJ J₁ h₁ (mt disjoint_iff.1 hne)
· rw [mem_filter] at hJ
rcases Set.mem_iUnion₂.1 (hJ.2 J.upper_mem) with ⟨J', hJ', hmem⟩
refine ⟨J', hJ', ht I _ hJ' _ hJ.1 <| Box.not_disjoint_coe_iff_nonempty_inter.2 ?_⟩
exact ⟨J.upper, hmem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem exists_splitMany_inf_eq_filter_of_finite (s : Set (Prepartition I)) (hs : s.Finite) :
∃ t : Finset (ι × ℝ),
∀ π ∈ s, π ⊓ splitMany I t = (splitMany I t).filter fun J => ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
haveI := fun π (_ : π ∈ s) => eventually_splitMany_inf_eq_filter π
(hs.eventually_all.2 this).exists
/-- If `π` is a partition of `I`, then there exists a finite set `s` of hyperplanes such that
`splitMany I s ≤ π`. -/
theorem IsPartition.exists_splitMany_le {I : Box ι} {π : Prepartition I} (h : IsPartition π) :
∃ s, splitMany I s ≤ π := by
refine (eventually_splitMany_inf_eq_filter π).exists.imp fun s hs => ?_
rwa [h.iUnion_eq, filter_of_true, inf_eq_right] at hs
exact fun J hJ => le_of_mem _ hJ
/-- For every prepartition `π` of `I` there exists a prepartition that covers exactly
`I \ π.iUnion`. -/
theorem exists_iUnion_eq_diff (π : Prepartition I) :
∃ π' : Prepartition I, π'.iUnion = ↑I \ π.iUnion := by
rcases π.eventually_splitMany_inf_eq_filter.exists with ⟨s, hs⟩
use (splitMany I s).filter fun J => ¬(J : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ π.iUnion
simp [← hs]
/-- If `π` is a prepartition of `I`, then `π.compl` is a prepartition of `I`
such that `π.compl.iUnion = I \ π.iUnion`. -/
def compl (π : Prepartition I) : Prepartition I :=
π.exists_iUnion_eq_diff.choose
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_compl (π : Prepartition I) : π.compl.iUnion = ↑I \ π.iUnion :=
π.exists_iUnion_eq_diff.choose_spec
/-- Since the definition of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.compl` uses `Exists.choose`,
the result depends only on `π.iUnion`. -/
theorem compl_congr {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} (h : π₁.iUnion = π₂.iUnion) : π₁.compl = π₂.compl := by
dsimp only [compl]
congr 1
rw [h]
theorem IsPartition.compl_eq_bot {π : Prepartition I} (h : IsPartition π) : π.compl = ⊥ := by
rw [← iUnion_eq_empty, iUnion_compl, h.iUnion_eq, diff_self]
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).compl = ⊥ :=
(isPartitionTop I).compl_eq_bot
end Finite
end Prepartition
end BoxIntegral
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Split.lean | 375 | 378 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.PathCategory.Basic
/-!
# Free groupoid on a quiver
This file defines the free groupoid on a quiver, the lifting of a prefunctor to its unique
extension as a functor from the free groupoid, and proves uniqueness of this extension.
## Main results
Given the type `V` and a quiver instance on `V`:
- `FreeGroupoid V`: a type synonym for `V`.
- `FreeGroupoid.instGroupoid`: the `Groupoid` instance on `FreeGroupoid V`.
- `lift`: the lifting of a prefunctor from `V` to `V'` where `V'` is a groupoid, to a functor.
`FreeGroupoid V ⥤ V'`.
- `lift_spec` and `lift_unique`: the proofs that, respectively, `lift` indeed is a lifting
and is the unique one.
## Implementation notes
The free groupoid is first defined by symmetrifying the quiver, taking the induced path category
and finally quotienting by the reducibility relation.
-/
open Set Function
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Groupoid
namespace Free
universe u v u' v' u'' v''
variable {V : Type u} [Quiver.{v + 1} V]
/-- Shorthand for the "forward" arrow corresponding to `f` in `paths <| symmetrify V` -/
abbrev _root_.Quiver.Hom.toPosPath {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(CategoryTheory.Paths.categoryPaths <| Quiver.Symmetrify V).Hom X Y :=
f.toPos.toPath
/-- Shorthand for the "forward" arrow corresponding to `f` in `paths <| symmetrify V` -/
abbrev _root_.Quiver.Hom.toNegPath {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(CategoryTheory.Paths.categoryPaths <| Quiver.Symmetrify V).Hom Y X :=
f.toNeg.toPath
/-- The "reduction" relation -/
inductive redStep : HomRel (Paths (Quiver.Symmetrify V))
| step (X Z : Quiver.Symmetrify V) (f : X ⟶ Z) :
redStep (𝟙 ((Paths.of (Quiver.Symmetrify V)).obj X)) (f.toPath ≫ (Quiver.reverse f).toPath)
/-- The underlying vertices of the free groupoid -/
def _root_.CategoryTheory.FreeGroupoid (V) [Q : Quiver V] :=
Quotient (@redStep V Q)
instance {V} [Quiver V] [Nonempty V] : Nonempty (FreeGroupoid V) := by
inhabit V; exact ⟨⟨@default V _⟩⟩
theorem congr_reverse {X Y : Paths <| Quiver.Symmetrify V} (p q : X ⟶ Y) :
Quotient.CompClosure redStep p q → Quotient.CompClosure redStep p.reverse q.reverse := by
rintro ⟨XW, pp, qq, WY, _, Z, f⟩
have : Quotient.CompClosure redStep (WY.reverse ≫ 𝟙 _ ≫ XW.reverse)
(WY.reverse ≫ (f.toPath ≫ (Quiver.reverse f).toPath) ≫ XW.reverse) := by
constructor
constructor
simpa only [CategoryStruct.comp, CategoryStruct.id, Quiver.Path.reverse, Quiver.Path.nil_comp,
Quiver.Path.reverse_comp, Quiver.reverse_reverse, Quiver.Path.reverse_toPath,
Quiver.Path.comp_assoc] using this
open Relation in
theorem congr_comp_reverse {X Y : Paths <| Quiver.Symmetrify V} (p : X ⟶ Y) :
Quot.mk (@Quotient.CompClosure _ _ redStep _ _) (p ≫ p.reverse) =
Quot.mk (@Quotient.CompClosure _ _ redStep _ _) (𝟙 X) := by
apply Quot.eqvGen_sound
induction p with
| nil => apply EqvGen.refl
| cons q f ih =>
simp only [Quiver.Path.reverse]
fapply EqvGen.trans
-- Porting note: `Quiver.Path.*` and `Quiver.Hom.*` notation not working
· exact q ≫ Quiver.Path.reverse q
· apply EqvGen.symm
apply EqvGen.rel
have : Quotient.CompClosure redStep (q ≫ 𝟙 _ ≫ Quiver.Path.reverse q)
(q ≫ (Quiver.Hom.toPath f ≫ Quiver.Hom.toPath (Quiver.reverse f)) ≫
Quiver.Path.reverse q) := by
apply Quotient.CompClosure.intro
apply redStep.step
simp only [Category.assoc, Category.id_comp] at this ⊢
-- Porting note: `simp` cannot see how `Quiver.Path.comp_assoc` is relevant, so change to
-- category notation
change Quotient.CompClosure redStep (q ≫ Quiver.Path.reverse q)
(Quiver.Path.cons q f ≫ (Quiver.Hom.toPath (Quiver.reverse f)) ≫ (Quiver.Path.reverse q))
simp only [← Category.assoc] at this ⊢
exact this
· exact ih
theorem congr_reverse_comp {X Y : Paths <| Quiver.Symmetrify V} (p : X ⟶ Y) :
Quot.mk (@Quotient.CompClosure _ _ redStep _ _) (p.reverse ≫ p) =
Quot.mk (@Quotient.CompClosure _ _ redStep _ _) (𝟙 Y) := by
nth_rw 2 [← Quiver.Path.reverse_reverse p]
apply congr_comp_reverse
instance : Category (FreeGroupoid V) :=
Quotient.category redStep
/-- The inverse of an arrow in the free groupoid -/
def quotInv {X Y : FreeGroupoid V} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Y ⟶ X :=
Quot.liftOn f (fun pp => Quot.mk _ <| pp.reverse) fun pp qq con =>
Quot.sound <| congr_reverse pp qq con
| instance _root_.CategoryTheory.FreeGroupoid.instGroupoid : Groupoid (FreeGroupoid V) where
inv := quotInv
inv_comp p := Quot.inductionOn p fun pp => congr_reverse_comp pp
comp_inv p := Quot.inductionOn p fun pp => congr_comp_reverse pp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Groupoid/FreeGroupoid.lean | 120 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.NoetherianSpace
/-!
# Quasi-separated spaces
A topological space is quasi-separated if the intersections of any pairs of compact open subsets
are still compact.
Notable examples include spectral spaces, Noetherian spaces, and Hausdorff spaces.
A non-example is the interval `[0, 1]` with doubled origin: the two copies of `[0, 1]` are compact
open subsets, but their intersection `(0, 1]` is not.
## Main results
- `IsQuasiSeparated`: A subset `s` of a topological space is quasi-separated if the intersections
of any pairs of compact open subsets of `s` are still compact.
- `QuasiSeparatedSpace`: A topological space is quasi-separated if the intersections of any pairs
of compact open subsets are still compact.
- `QuasiSeparatedSpace.of_isOpenEmbedding`: If `f : α → β` is an open embedding, and `β` is
a quasi-separated space, then so is `α`.
-/
open Set TopologicalSpace Topology
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- A subset `s` of a topological space is quasi-separated if the intersections of any pairs of
compact open subsets of `s` are still compact.
Note that this is equivalent to `s` being a `QuasiSeparatedSpace` only when `s` is open. -/
def IsQuasiSeparated (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ U V : Set α, U ⊆ s → IsOpen U → IsCompact U → V ⊆ s → IsOpen V → IsCompact V → IsCompact (U ∩ V)
/-- A topological space is quasi-separated if the intersections of any pairs of compact open
subsets are still compact. -/
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSeparatedSpace (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The intersection of two open compact subsets of a quasi-separated space is compact. -/
inter_isCompact :
∀ U V : Set α, IsOpen U → IsCompact U → IsOpen V → IsCompact V → IsCompact (U ∩ V)
theorem isQuasiSeparated_univ_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] :
IsQuasiSeparated (Set.univ : Set α) ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace α := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff]
simp [IsQuasiSeparated]
theorem isQuasiSeparated_univ {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [QuasiSeparatedSpace α] :
IsQuasiSeparated (Set.univ : Set α) :=
isQuasiSeparated_univ_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem IsQuasiSeparated.image_of_isEmbedding {s : Set α} (H : IsQuasiSeparated s)
(h : IsEmbedding f) : IsQuasiSeparated (f '' s) := by
intro U V hU hU' hU'' hV hV' hV''
convert
(H (f ⁻¹' U) (f ⁻¹' V)
?_ (h.continuous.1 _ hU') ?_ ?_ (h.continuous.1 _ hV') ?_).image h.continuous
· symm
rw [← Set.preimage_inter, Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Set.inter_eq_left]
exact Set.inter_subset_left.trans (hU.trans (Set.image_subset_range _ _))
· intro x hx
rw [← h.injective.injOn.mem_image_iff (Set.subset_univ _) trivial]
exact hU hx
· rw [h.isCompact_iff]
convert hU''
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Set.inter_eq_left]
exact hU.trans (Set.image_subset_range _ _)
· intro x hx
rw [← h.injective.injOn.mem_image_iff (Set.subset_univ _) trivial]
exact hV hx
· rw [h.isCompact_iff]
convert hV''
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Set.inter_eq_left]
exact hV.trans (Set.image_subset_range _ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias IsQuasiSeparated.image_of_embedding := IsQuasiSeparated.image_of_isEmbedding
theorem Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.isQuasiSeparated_iff (h : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set α} :
IsQuasiSeparated s ↔ IsQuasiSeparated (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun hs => hs.image_of_isEmbedding h.isEmbedding, ?_⟩
intro H U V hU hU' hU'' hV hV' hV''
rw [h.isEmbedding.isCompact_iff, Set.image_inter h.injective]
exact
H (f '' U) (f '' V) (Set.image_subset _ hU) (h.isOpenMap _ hU') (hU''.image h.continuous)
(Set.image_subset _ hV) (h.isOpenMap _ hV') (hV''.image h.continuous)
theorem isQuasiSeparated_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace (s : Set α) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsQuasiSeparated s ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace s := by
rw [← isQuasiSeparated_univ_iff]
convert (hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isQuasiSeparated_iff (s := Set.univ)).symm
simp
| theorem IsQuasiSeparated.of_subset {s t : Set α} (ht : IsQuasiSeparated t) (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsQuasiSeparated s := by
intro U V hU hU' hU'' hV hV' hV''
exact ht U V (hU.trans h) hU' hU'' (hV.trans h) hV' hV''
| Mathlib/Topology/QuasiSeparated.lean | 99 | 103 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
· simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists, coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ h, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_add (f : α ↪ β) (v w : α →₀ M) :
embDomain f (v + w) = embDomain f v + embDomain f w :=
(embDomain.addMonoidHom f).map_add v w
end AddZeroClass
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instNatSMul : SMul ℕ (α →₀ M) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (nsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
end AddMonoid
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid M] : AddCommMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid
DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add (fun _ _ => rfl)
instance instNeg [NegZeroClass G] : Neg (α →₀ G) :=
⟨mapRange Neg.neg neg_zero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
theorem neg_apply [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (-g) a = -g a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_neg [NegZeroClass G] [NegZeroClass H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (v : α →₀ G) : mapRange f hf (-v) = -mapRange f hf v :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', neg_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_neg' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (-v) = -mapRange f (map_zero f) v :=
mapRange_neg (map_neg f) v
instance instSub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] : Sub (α →₀ G) :=
⟨zipWith Sub.sub (sub_zero _)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) : ⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ := rfl
theorem sub_apply [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (g₁ - g₂) a = g₁ a - g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] [SubNegZeroMonoid H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ - mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', sub_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_sub' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ - mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_sub (map_sub f) v₁ v₂
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℤ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instIntSMul [AddGroup G] : SMul ℤ (α →₀ G) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (zsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddGroup [AddGroup G] : AddGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance instAddCommGroup [AddCommGroup G] : AddCommGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_neg [AddGroup G] (f : α →₀ G) : support (-f) = support f :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm support_mapRange
(calc
support f = support (- -f) := congr_arg support (neg_neg _).symm
_ ⊆ support (-f) := support_mapRange
)
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq α] [AddGroup G] {f g : α →₀ G} :
support (f - g) ⊆ support f ∪ support g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← support_neg g]
exact support_add
end Finsupp
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 654 | 657 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Away
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Multiplicity
/-!
# Localizations away from an element
## Main definitions
* `IsLocalization.Away (x : R) S` expresses that `S` is a localization away from `x`, as an
abbreviation of `IsLocalization (Submonoid.powers x) S`.
* `exists_reduced_fraction' (hb : b ≠ 0)` produces a reduced fraction of the form `b = a * x^n` for
some `n : ℤ` and some `a : R` that is not divisible by `x`.
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommSemiring P]
namespace IsLocalization
section Away
variable (x : R)
/-- Given `x : R`, the typeclass `IsLocalization.Away x S` states that `S` is
isomorphic to the localization of `R` at the submonoid generated by `x`.
See `IsLocalization.Away.mk` for a specialized constructor. -/
abbrev Away (S : Type*) [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] :=
IsLocalization (Submonoid.powers x) S
namespace Away
variable [IsLocalization.Away x S]
/-- Given `x : R` and a localization map `F : R →+* S` away from `x`, `invSelf` is `(F x)⁻¹`. -/
noncomputable def invSelf : S :=
mk' S (1 : R) ⟨x, Submonoid.mem_powers _⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_invSelf : algebraMap R S x * invSelf x = 1 := by
convert IsLocalization.mk'_mul_mk'_eq_one (M := Submonoid.powers x) (S := S) _ 1
symm
apply IsLocalization.mk'_one
/-- For `s : S` with `S` being the localization of `R` away from `x`,
this is a choice of `(r, n) : R × ℕ` such that `s * algebraMap R S (x ^ n) = algebraMap R S r`. -/
noncomputable def sec (s : S) : R × ℕ :=
⟨(IsLocalization.sec (Submonoid.powers x) s).1,
(IsLocalization.sec (Submonoid.powers x) s).2.property.choose⟩
lemma sec_spec (s : S) : s * (algebraMap R S) (x ^ (IsLocalization.Away.sec x s).2) =
algebraMap R S (IsLocalization.Away.sec x s).1 := by
simp only [IsLocalization.Away.sec, ← IsLocalization.sec_spec]
congr
exact (IsLocalization.sec (Submonoid.powers x) s).2.property.choose_spec
lemma algebraMap_pow_isUnit (n : ℕ) : IsUnit (algebraMap R S x ^ n) :=
IsUnit.pow _ <| IsLocalization.map_units _ (⟨x, 1, by simp⟩ : Submonoid.powers x)
lemma algebraMap_isUnit : IsUnit (algebraMap R S x) :=
IsLocalization.map_units _ (⟨x, 1, by simp⟩ : Submonoid.powers x)
lemma algebraMap_isUnit_iff {y : R} : IsUnit (algebraMap R S y) ↔ ∃ n, y ∣ x ^ n :=
(IsLocalization.algebraMap_isUnit_iff <| .powers x).trans <| by simp [Submonoid.mem_powers_iff]
lemma surj (z : S) : ∃ (n : ℕ) (a : R), z * algebraMap R S x ^ n = algebraMap R S a := by
obtain ⟨⟨a, ⟨-, n, rfl⟩⟩, h⟩ := IsLocalization.surj (Submonoid.powers x) z
use n, a
simpa using h
lemma exists_of_eq {a b : R} (h : algebraMap R S a = algebraMap R S b) :
∃ (n : ℕ), x ^ n * a = x ^ n * b := by
obtain ⟨⟨-, n, rfl⟩, hx⟩ := IsLocalization.exists_of_eq (M := Submonoid.powers x) h
use n
/-- Specialized constructor for `IsLocalization.Away`. -/
lemma mk (r : R) (map_unit : IsUnit (algebraMap R S r))
(surj : ∀ s, ∃ (n : ℕ) (a : R), s * algebraMap R S r ^ n = algebraMap R S a)
(exists_of_eq : ∀ a b, algebraMap R S a = algebraMap R S b → ∃ (n : ℕ), r ^ n * a = r ^ n * b) :
IsLocalization.Away r S where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨-, n, rfl⟩
simp only [map_pow]
exact IsUnit.pow _ map_unit
surj' z := by
obtain ⟨n, a, hn⟩ := surj z
use ⟨a, ⟨r ^ n, n, rfl⟩⟩
simpa using hn
exists_of_eq {x y} h := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_of_eq x y h
use ⟨r ^ n, n, rfl⟩
lemma of_associated {r r' : R} (h : Associated r r') [IsLocalization.Away r S] :
IsLocalization.Away r' S := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
refine mk _ ?_ (fun s ↦ ?_) (fun a b hab ↦ ?_)
· simp [algebraMap_isUnit r, IsUnit.map _ u.isUnit]
· obtain ⟨n, a, hn⟩ := surj r s
use n, a * u ^ n
simp [mul_pow, ← mul_assoc, hn]
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_of_eq r hab
use n
rw [mul_pow, mul_comm (r ^ n), mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hn]
/-- If `r` and `r'` are associated elements of `R`, an `R`-algebra `S`
is the localization of `R` away from `r` if and only of it is the localization of `R` away from
`r'`. -/
lemma iff_of_associated {r r' : R} (h : Associated r r') :
IsLocalization.Away r S ↔ IsLocalization.Away r' S :=
⟨fun _ ↦ IsLocalization.Away.of_associated h, fun _ ↦ IsLocalization.Away.of_associated h.symm⟩
lemma isUnit_of_dvd {r : R} (h : r ∣ x) : IsUnit (algebraMap R S r) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_unit (map_dvd _ h) (algebraMap_isUnit x)
variable {g : R →+* P}
/-- Given `x : R`, a localization map `F : R →+* S` away from `x`, and a map of `CommSemiring`s
`g : R →+* P` such that `g x` is invertible, the homomorphism induced from `S` to `P` sending
`z : S` to `g y * (g x)⁻ⁿ`, where `y : R, n : ℕ` are such that `z = F y * (F x)⁻ⁿ`. -/
noncomputable def lift (hg : IsUnit (g x)) : S →+* P :=
IsLocalization.lift fun y : Submonoid.powers x =>
show IsUnit (g y.1) by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := y.2
rw [← hn, g.map_pow]
exact IsUnit.map (powMonoidHom n : P →* P) hg
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq (hg : IsUnit (g x)) (a : R) : lift x hg (algebraMap R S a) = g a :=
IsLocalization.lift_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp (hg : IsUnit (g x)) : (lift x hg).comp (algebraMap R S) = g :=
IsLocalization.lift_comp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-25")] alias AwayMap.lift_eq := lift_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-25")] alias AwayMap.lift_comp := lift_comp
/-- Given `x y : R` and localizations `S`, `P` away from `x` and `y * x`
respectively, the homomorphism induced from `S` to `P`. -/
noncomputable def awayToAwayLeft (y : R) [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization.Away (y * x) P] : S →+* P :=
lift x <| isUnit_of_dvd (y * x) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
/-- Given `x y : R` and localizations `S`, `P` away from `x` and `x * y`
respectively, the homomorphism induced from `S` to `P`. -/
noncomputable def awayToAwayRight (y : R) [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization.Away (x * y) P] : S →+* P :=
lift x <| isUnit_of_dvd (x * y) (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem awayToAwayLeft_eq (y : R) [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization.Away (y * x) P] (a : R) :
awayToAwayLeft x y (algebraMap R S a) = algebraMap R P a :=
lift_eq _ _ _
theorem awayToAwayRight_eq (y : R) [Algebra R P] [IsLocalization.Away (x * y) P] (a : R) :
awayToAwayRight x y (algebraMap R S a) = algebraMap R P a :=
lift_eq _ _ _
variable (S) (Q : Type*) [CommSemiring Q] [Algebra P Q]
/-- Given a map `f : R →+* S` and an element `r : R`, we may construct a map `Rᵣ →+* Sᵣ`. -/
noncomputable def map (f : R →+* P) (r : R) [IsLocalization.Away r S]
[IsLocalization.Away (f r) Q] : S →+* Q :=
IsLocalization.map Q f
(show Submonoid.powers r ≤ (Submonoid.powers (f r)).comap f by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
use n
simp)
section Algebra
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable {B : Type*} [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable (Aₚ : Type*) [CommSemiring Aₚ] [Algebra A Aₚ] [Algebra R Aₚ] [IsScalarTower R A Aₚ]
variable (Bₚ : Type*) [CommSemiring Bₚ] [Algebra B Bₚ] [Algebra R Bₚ] [IsScalarTower R B Bₚ]
instance {f : A →+* B} (a : A) [Away (f a) Bₚ] : IsLocalization (.map f (.powers a)) Bₚ := by
simpa
/-- Given a algebra map `f : A →ₐ[R] B` and an element `a : A`, we may construct a map
`Aₐ →ₐ[R] Bₐ`. -/
noncomputable def mapₐ (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) [Away a Aₚ] [Away (f a) Bₚ] : Aₚ →ₐ[R] Bₚ :=
⟨map Aₚ Bₚ f.toRingHom a, fun r ↦ by
dsimp only [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, map, RingHom.coe_coe, OneHom.toFun_eq_coe]
rw [IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R A Aₚ, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq R B Bₚ]
simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma mapₐ_apply (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) [Away a Aₚ] [Away (f a) Bₚ] (x : Aₚ) :
mapₐ Aₚ Bₚ f a x = map Aₚ Bₚ f.toRingHom a x :=
rfl
variable {Aₚ} {Bₚ}
lemma mapₐ_injective_of_injective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (a : A) [Away a Aₚ] [Away (f a) Bₚ]
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (mapₐ Aₚ Bₚ f a) :=
IsLocalization.map_injective_of_injective _ _ _ hf
lemma mapₐ_surjective_of_surjective {f : A →ₐ[R] B} (a : A) [Away a Aₚ] [Away (f a) Bₚ]
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Function.Surjective (mapₐ Aₚ Bₚ f a) :=
have : IsLocalization (Submonoid.map f.toRingHom (Submonoid.powers a)) Bₚ := by
simp only [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, Submonoid.map_powers, RingHom.coe_coe]
| infer_instance
IsLocalization.map_surjective_of_surjective _ _ _ hf
end Algebra
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Away/Basic.lean | 218 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Chris Hughes, Daniel Weber
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiplicity of a divisor
For a commutative monoid, this file introduces the notion of multiplicity of a divisor and proves
several basic results on it.
## Main definitions
* `emultiplicity a b`: for two elements `a` and `b` of a commutative monoid returns the largest
number `n` such that `a ^ n ∣ b` or infinity, written `⊤`, if `a ^ n ∣ b` for all natural numbers
`n`.
* `multiplicity a b`: a `ℕ`-valued version of `multiplicity`, defaulting for `1` instead of `⊤`.
The reason for using `1` as a default value instead of `0` is to have `multiplicity_eq_zero_iff`.
* `FiniteMultiplicity a b`: a predicate denoting that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β : Type*}
open Nat
/-- `multiplicity.Finite a b` indicates that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite. -/
abbrev FiniteMultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite := FiniteMultiplicity
open scoped Classical in
/-- `emultiplicity a b` returns the largest natural number `n` such that
`a ^ n ∣ b`, as an `ℕ∞`. If `∀ n, a ^ n ∣ b` then it returns `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def emultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ∞ :=
if h : FiniteMultiplicity a b then Nat.find h else ⊤
/-- A `ℕ`-valued version of `emultiplicity`, returning `1` instead of `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def multiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ :=
(emultiplicity a b).untopD 1
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_top :
emultiplicity a b = ⊤ ↔ ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_lt_top {a b : α} : emultiplicity a b < ⊤ ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, emultiplicity_eq_top]
theorem finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top :
FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ emultiplicity a b ≠ ⊤ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top := finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
alias ⟨FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top, _⟩ := finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-08")]
alias Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
by_contra! nh
rw [← emultiplicity_eq_top, h] at nh
trivial
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast := finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [multiplicity, h]
rfl
theorem emultiplicity_ne_of_multiplicity_ne {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b ≠ n → emultiplicity a b ≠ n :=
mt multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
emultiplicity a b = multiplicity a b := by
cases hm : emultiplicity a b
· simp [h] at hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some hm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq
theorem emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
constructor
· exact multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
· intro h₂
simpa [multiplicity, WithTop.untopD_eq_iff, h] using h₂
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ multiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity (h : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b = 1 := by
simp [multiplicity, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finite :=
multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_le_emultiplicity :
multiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· simp [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· simp [hf, emultiplicity_eq_top.2]
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq {c d : β}
(h : emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d) : multiplicity a b = multiplicity c d := by
unfold multiplicity
rw [h]
theorem multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b ≤ n) :
multiplicity a b ≤ n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b ≤ n) : emultiplicity a b ≤ n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ multiplicity a b) :
n ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_mono h).trans multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ emultiplicity a b) : n ≤ multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity
theorem multiplicity_lt_of_emultiplicity_lt {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b < n) :
multiplicity a b < n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans_lt h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b < n) : emultiplicity a b < n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n < multiplicity a b) :
n < emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_strictMono h).trans_le multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n < emultiplicity a b) : n < multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_pos_iff :
0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ 0 < multiplicity a b := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.def : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite.def := FiniteMultiplicity.def
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right : FiniteMultiplicity a 1 → ¬a ∣ 1 :=
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ => hn ⟨d ^ (n + 1), (pow_mul_pow_eq_one (n + 1) hd.symm).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_dvd_of_one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_emultiplicity (a b : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = emultiplicity a b := by
unfold emultiplicity FiniteMultiplicity
congr! <;> norm_cast
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_multiplicity (a b : ℕ) : multiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (natCast_emultiplicity a b)
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b :=
⟨fun h n =>
Nat.casesOn n
(by
rw [_root_.pow_zero]
exact one_dvd _)
(by simpa [FiniteMultiplicity] using h),
by simp [FiniteMultiplicity, multiplicity]; tauto⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_iff_forall := FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : ¬IsUnit a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
hn ∘ IsUnit.dvd ∘ IsUnit.pow (n + 1)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_unit := FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left {c : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c) → FiniteMultiplicity a b := fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, fun h => hn (h.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _))⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_left := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ emultiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := by classical
cases k
· simp
unfold emultiplicity at hk
split at hk
· norm_cast at hk
simpa using (Nat.find_min _ (lt_of_succ_le hk))
· apply FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp ‹_›
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ multiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity hk)
@[simp]
theorem pow_multiplicity_dvd (a b : α) : a ^ (multiplicity a b) ∣ b :=
pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity le_rfl
theorem not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt {m : ℕ} (hm : emultiplicity a b < m) :
¬a ^ m ∣ b := fun nh => by
unfold emultiplicity at hm
split at hm
· simp only [cast_lt, find_lt_iff] at hm
obtain ⟨n, hn1, hn2⟩ := hm
exact hn2 ((pow_dvd_pow _ hn1).trans nh)
· simp at hm
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {m : ℕ}
(hm : multiplicity a b < m) : ¬a ^ m ∣ b := by
apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
norm_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem multiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < multiplicity a b := by
refine Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h => ?_
simpa [hdiv] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(by by_contra! nh; simp [nh] at h) (lt_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem emultiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < emultiplicity a b :=
lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hdiv)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
emultiplicity a b = k := by classical
have : FiniteMultiplicity a b := ⟨k, hsucc⟩
simp only [emultiplicity, this, ↓reduceDIte, Nat.cast_inj, find_eq_iff, hsucc, not_false_eq_true,
Decidable.not_not, true_and]
exact fun n hn ↦ (pow_dvd_pow _ hn).trans hk
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
multiplicity a b = k :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some (emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd hk hsucc)
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) :
k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
le_of_not_gt fun hk' => not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt hk' hk
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) : k ≤ multiplicity a b :=
hf.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hk)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd
theorem pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
⟨le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity⟩
| theorem FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ multiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity ▸ pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 320 | 324 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
/-!
# The category of open sets in a topological space.
We define `toTopCat : Opens X ⥤ TopCat` and
`map (f : X ⟶ Y) : Opens Y ⥤ Opens X`, given by taking preimages of open sets.
Unfortunately `Opens` isn't (usefully) a functor `TopCat ⥤ Cat`.
(One can in fact define such a functor,
but using it results in unresolvable `Eq.rec` terms in goals.)
Really it's a 2-functor from (spaces, continuous functions, equalities)
to (categories, functors, natural isomorphisms).
We don't attempt to set up the full theory here, but do provide the natural isomorphisms
`mapId : map (𝟙 X) ≅ 𝟭 (Opens X)` and
`mapComp : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map g ⋙ map f`.
Beyond that, there's a collection of simp lemmas for working with these constructions.
-/
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Opposite Topology
universe u
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} {U V W : Opens X}
/-!
Since `Opens X` has a partial order, it automatically receives a `Category` instance.
Unfortunately, because we do not allow morphisms in `Prop`,
the morphisms `U ⟶ V` are not just proofs `U ≤ V`, but rather
`ULift (PLift (U ≤ V))`.
-/
instance opensHom.instFunLike : FunLike (U ⟶ V) U V where
coe f := Set.inclusion f.le
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟨_⟩⟩ _ _; congr!
lemma apply_def (f : U ⟶ V) (x : U) : f x = ⟨x, f.le x.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma apply_mk (f : U ⟶ V) (x : X) (hx) : f ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, f.le hx⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma val_apply (f : U ⟶ V) (x : U) : (f x : X) = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id (f : U ⟶ U) : ⇑f = id := rfl
lemma id_apply (f : U ⟶ U) (x : U) : f x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_apply (f : U ⟶ V) (g : V ⟶ W) (x : U) : (f ≫ g) x = g (f x) := rfl
/-!
We now construct as morphisms various inclusions of open sets.
-/
-- This is tedious, but necessary because we decided not to allow Prop as morphisms in a category...
/-- The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def infLELeft (U V : Opens X) : U ⊓ V ⟶ U :=
inf_le_left.hom
/-- The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ V` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def infLERight (U V : Opens X) : U ⊓ V ⟶ V :=
inf_le_right.hom
/-- The inclusion `U i ⟶ iSup U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leSupr {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens X) (i : ι) : U i ⟶ iSup U :=
(le_iSup U i).hom
/-- The inclusion `⊥ ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def botLE (U : Opens X) : ⊥ ⟶ U :=
bot_le.hom
/-- The inclusion `U ⟶ ⊤` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leTop (U : Opens X) : U ⟶ ⊤ :=
le_top.hom
-- We do not mark this as a simp lemma because it breaks open `x`.
-- Nevertheless, it is useful in `SheafOfFunctions`.
theorem infLELeft_apply (U V : Opens X) (x) :
(infLELeft U V) x = ⟨x.1, (@inf_le_left _ _ U V : _ ≤ _) x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem infLELeft_apply_mk (U V : Opens X) (x) (m) :
(infLELeft U V) ⟨x, m⟩ = ⟨x, (@inf_le_left _ _ U V : _ ≤ _) m⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leSupr_apply_mk {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens X) (i : ι) (x) (m) :
(leSupr U i) ⟨x, m⟩ = ⟨x, (le_iSup U i :) m⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The functor from open sets in `X` to `TopCat`,
realising each open set as a topological space itself.
-/
def toTopCat (X : TopCat.{u}) : Opens X ⥤ TopCat where
obj U := TopCat.of U
map i := TopCat.ofHom ⟨fun x ↦ ⟨x.1, i.le x.2⟩,
IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.continuous_iff.2 continuous_induced_dom⟩
@[simp]
theorem toTopCat_map (X : TopCat.{u}) {U V : Opens X} {f : U ⟶ V} {x} {h} :
((toTopCat X).map f) ⟨x, h⟩ = ⟨x, f.le h⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The inclusion map from an open subset to the whole space, as a morphism in `TopCat`.
-/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def inclusion' {X : TopCat.{u}} (U : Opens X) : (toTopCat X).obj U ⟶ X :=
TopCat.ofHom
{ toFun := _
continuous_toFun := continuous_subtype_val }
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion' {X : TopCat} {U : Opens X} :
(inclusion' U : U → X) = Subtype.val := rfl
theorem isOpenEmbedding {X : TopCat.{u}} (U : Opens X) : IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion' U) :=
U.2.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal
/-- The inclusion of the top open subset (i.e. the whole space) is an isomorphism.
-/
def inclusionTopIso (X : TopCat.{u}) : (toTopCat X).obj ⊤ ≅ X where
hom := inclusion' ⊤
inv := TopCat.ofHom ⟨fun x => ⟨x, trivial⟩, continuous_def.2 fun _ ⟨_, hS, hSU⟩ => hSU ▸ hS⟩
/-- `Opens.map f` gives the functor from open sets in Y to open set in X,
given by taking preimages under f. -/
def map (f : X ⟶ Y) : Opens Y ⥤ Opens X where
obj U := ⟨f ⁻¹' (U : Set Y), U.isOpen.preimage f.hom.continuous⟩
map i := ⟨⟨fun _ h => i.le h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) : ((map f).obj U : Set X) = f ⁻¹' (U : Set Y) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (U) (p) : (map f).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = ⟨f ⁻¹' U, p.preimage f.hom.continuous⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_homOfLE (f : X ⟶ Y) {U V : Opens Y} (e : U ≤ V) :
(TopologicalSpace.Opens.map f).map (homOfLE e) =
homOfLE (show (Opens.map f).obj U ≤ (Opens.map f).obj V from fun _ hx ↦ e hx) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id_obj (U : Opens X) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj U = U :=
let ⟨_, _⟩ := U
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id_obj' (U) (p) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = ⟨U, p⟩ :=
rfl
theorem map_id_obj_unop (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj (unop U) = unop U := by
simp
theorem op_map_id_obj (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X)).op.obj U = U := by simp
@[simp]
lemma map_top (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Opens.map f).obj ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
/-- The inclusion `U ⟶ (map f).obj ⊤` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leMapTop (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens X) : U ⟶ (map f).obj ⊤ :=
leTop U
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(map (f ≫ g)).obj U = (map f).obj ((map g).obj U) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_obj' (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) (p) :
(map (f ≫ g)).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = (map f).obj ((map g).obj ⟨U, p⟩) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) {U V} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(map (f ≫ g)).map i = (map f).map ((map g).map i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_obj_unop (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(map (f ≫ g)).obj (unop U) = (map f).obj ((map g).obj (unop U)) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_map_comp_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(map (f ≫ g)).op.obj U = (map f).op.obj ((map g).op.obj U) :=
rfl
theorem map_iSup (f : X ⟶ Y) {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens Y) :
(map f).obj (iSup U) = iSup ((map f).obj ∘ U) := by
ext1; rw [iSup_def, iSup_def, map_obj]
dsimp; rw [Set.preimage_iUnion]
section
variable (X)
/-- The functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens X` given by taking preimages under the identity function
is naturally isomorphic to the identity functor.
-/
@[simps]
def mapId : map (𝟙 X) ≅ 𝟭 (Opens X) where
hom := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_id_obj U) }
inv := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_id_obj U).symm }
theorem map_id_eq : map (𝟙 X) = 𝟭 (Opens X) := by
rfl
end
/-- The natural isomorphism between taking preimages under `f ≫ g`, and the composite
of taking preimages under `g`, then preimages under `f`.
-/
@[simps]
def mapComp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map g ⋙ map f where
hom := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_comp_obj f g U) }
inv := { app := fun U => eqToHom (map_comp_obj f g U).symm }
theorem map_comp_eq (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : map (f ≫ g) = map g ⋙ map f :=
rfl
-- We could make `f g` implicit here, but it's nice to be able to see when
-- they are the identity (often!)
/-- If two continuous maps `f g : X ⟶ Y` are equal,
then the functors `Opens Y ⥤ Opens X` they induce are isomorphic.
-/
def mapIso (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) : map f ≅ map g :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun U => eqToIso (by rw [congr_arg map h])
theorem map_eq (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) : map f = map g := by
subst h
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapIso_refl (f : X ⟶ Y) (h) : mapIso f f h = Iso.refl (map _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapIso_hom_app (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) (U : Opens Y) :
(mapIso f g h).hom.app U = eqToHom (by rw [h]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapIso_inv_app (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : f = g) (U : Opens Y) :
(mapIso f g h).inv.app U = eqToHom (by rw [h]) :=
rfl
/-- A homeomorphism of spaces gives an equivalence of categories of open sets.
TODO: define `OrderIso.equivalence`, use it.
-/
@[simps]
def mapMapIso {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (H : X ≅ Y) : Opens Y ≌ Opens X where
functor := map H.hom
inverse := map H.inv
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun U => eqToIso (by simp [map, Set.preimage_preimage])
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun U => eqToIso (by simp [map, Set.preimage_preimage])
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
/-- An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y`.
-/
@[simps obj_coe]
def IsOpenMap.functor {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) : Opens X ⥤ Opens Y where
obj U := ⟨f '' (U : Set X), hf (U : Set X) U.2⟩
map h := ⟨⟨Set.image_subset _ h.down.down⟩⟩
/-- An open map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an adjunction between `Opens X` and `Opens Y`.
-/
def IsOpenMap.adjunction {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
hf.functor ⊣ Opens.map f where
unit := { app := fun _ => homOfLE fun x hxU => ⟨x, hxU, rfl⟩ }
counit := { app := fun _ => homOfLE fun _ ⟨_, hfxV, hxy⟩ => hxy ▸ hfxV }
instance IsOpenMap.functorFullOfMono {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) [H : Mono f] :
hf.functor.Full where
map_surjective i :=
⟨homOfLE fun x hx => by
obtain ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := i.le ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (TopCat.mono_iff_injective f).mp H eq ▸ hy, rfl⟩
instance IsOpenMap.functor_faithful {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
hf.functor.Faithful where
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.functor_obj_injective {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) : Function.Injective hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj :=
fun _ _ e ↦ Opens.ext (Set.image_injective.mpr hf.injective (congr_arg (↑· : Opens Y → Set Y) e))
namespace Topology.IsInducing
/-- Given an inducing map `X ⟶ Y` and some `U : Opens X`, this is the union of all open sets
whose preimage is `U`. This is right adjoint to `Opens.map`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def functorObj {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (_ : IsInducing f) (U : Opens X) : Opens Y :=
sSup { s : Opens Y | (Opens.map f).obj s = U }
lemma map_functorObj {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f)
(U : Opens X) :
(Opens.map f).obj (hf.functorObj U) = U := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro x ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, _, ⟨rfl : _ = U, rfl⟩, hx : f x ∈ s⟩; exact hx
· intros x hx
obtain ⟨U, hU⟩ := U
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := hf.isOpen_iff.mp hU
exact Opens.mem_sSup.mpr ⟨⟨_, ht⟩, rfl, hx⟩
lemma mem_functorObj_iff {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) (U : Opens X)
{x : X} : f x ∈ hf.functorObj U ↔ x ∈ U := by
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.map_functorObj U]
rfl
lemma le_functorObj_iff {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) {U : Opens X}
{V : Opens Y} : V ≤ hf.functorObj U ↔ (Opens.map f).obj V ≤ U := by
obtain ⟨U, hU⟩ := U
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := hf.isOpen_iff.mp hU
constructor
· exact fun i x hx ↦ (hf.mem_functorObj_iff ((Opens.map f).obj ⟨t, ht⟩)).mp (i hx)
· intros h x hx
refine Opens.mem_sSup.mpr ⟨⟨_, V.2.union ht⟩, Opens.ext ?_, Set.mem_union_left t hx⟩
dsimp
rwa [Set.union_eq_right]
/-- An inducing map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a Galois insertion between `Opens Y` and `Opens X`. -/
def opensGI {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
GaloisInsertion (Opens.map f).obj hf.functorObj :=
⟨_, fun _ _ ↦ hf.le_functorObj_iff.symm, fun U ↦ (hf.map_functorObj U).ge, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
/-- An inducing map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `Opens X ⥤ Opens Y`. -/
@[simps]
def functor {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
Opens X ⥤ Opens Y where
obj := hf.functorObj
map {U V} h := homOfLE (hf.le_functorObj_iff.mpr ((hf.map_functorObj U).trans_le h.le))
/-- An inducing map `f : X ⟶ Y` induces an adjunction between `Opens Y` and `Opens X`. -/
def adjunction {X Y : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
Opens.map f ⊣ hf.functor :=
hf.opensGI.gc.adjunction
end Topology.IsInducing
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
|
open TopologicalSpace
@[simp]
theorem isOpenEmbedding_obj_top {X : TopCat} (U : Opens X) :
U.isOpenEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ⊤ = U := by
ext1
exact Set.image_univ.trans Subtype.range_coe
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Opens.lean | 364 | 371 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.AddChar
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# The Fourier transform
We set up the Fourier transform for complex-valued functions on finite-dimensional spaces.
## Design choices
In namespace `VectorFourier`, we define the Fourier integral in the following context:
* `𝕜` is a commutative ring.
* `V` and `W` are `𝕜`-modules.
* `e` is a unitary additive character of `𝕜`, i.e. an `AddChar 𝕜 Circle`.
* `μ` is a measure on `V`.
* `L` is a `𝕜`-bilinear form `V × W → 𝕜`.
* `E` is a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space.
With these definitions, we define `fourierIntegral` to be the map from functions `V → E` to
functions `W → E` that sends `f` to
`fun w ↦ ∫ v in V, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ`,
This includes the cases `W` is the dual of `V` and `L` is the canonical pairing, or `W = V` and `L`
is a bilinear form (e.g. an inner product).
In namespace `Fourier`, we consider the more familiar special case when `V = W = 𝕜` and `L` is the
multiplication map (but still allowing `𝕜` to be an arbitrary ring equipped with a measure).
The most familiar case of all is when `V = W = 𝕜 = ℝ`, `L` is multiplication, `μ` is volume, and
`e` is `Real.fourierChar`, i.e. the character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we
introduced the notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`).
Another familiar case (which generalizes the previous one) is when `V = W` is an inner product space
over `ℝ` and `L` is the scalar product. We introduce two notations `𝓕` for the Fourier transform in
this case and `𝓕⁻ f (v) = 𝓕 f (-v)` for the inverse Fourier transform. These notations make
in particular sense for `V = W = ℝ`.
## Main results
At present the only nontrivial lemma we prove is `fourierIntegral_continuous`, stating that the
Fourier transform of an integrable function is continuous (under mild assumptions).
-/
noncomputable section
local notation "𝕊" => Circle
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology
/-! ## Fourier theory for functions on general vector spaces -/
namespace VectorFourier
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [MeasurableSpace V]
{W : Type*} [AddCommGroup W] [Module 𝕜 W]
{E F G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℂ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℂ G]
section Defs
/-- The Fourier transform integral for `f : V → E`, with respect to a bilinear form `L : V × W → 𝕜`
and an additive character `e`. -/
def fourierIntegral (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V) (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E)
(w : W) : E :=
∫ v, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ
theorem fourierIntegral_const_smul (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (r : ℂ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (r • f) = r • fourierIntegral e μ L f := by
ext1 w
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, fourierIntegral, smul_comm _ r, integral_smul]
/-- The uniform norm of the Fourier integral of `f` is bounded by the `L¹` norm of `f`. -/
theorem norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
‖fourierIntegral e μ L f w‖ ≤ ∫ v : V, ‖f v‖ ∂μ := by
refine (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
simp_rw [Circle.norm_smul]
/-- The Fourier integral converts right-translation into scalar multiplication by a phase factor. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_comp_add_right [MeasurableAdd V] (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
[μ.IsAddRightInvariant] (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (v₀ : V) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (f ∘ fun v ↦ v + v₀) =
fun w ↦ e (L v₀ w) • fourierIntegral e μ L f w := by
ext1 w
dsimp only [fourierIntegral, Function.comp_apply, Circle.smul_def]
conv in L _ => rw [← add_sub_cancel_right v v₀]
rw [integral_add_right_eq_self fun v : V ↦ (e (-L (v - v₀) w) : ℂ) • f v, ← integral_smul]
congr 1 with v
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← Circle.coe_mul, ← e.map_add_eq_mul, ← LinearMap.neg_apply,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.map_sub, neg_sub]
end Defs
section Continuous
/-! In this section we assume 𝕜, `V`, `W` have topologies,
and `L`, `e` are continuous (but `f` needn't be).
This is used to ensure that `e (-L v w)` is (a.e. strongly) measurable. We could get away with
imposing only a measurable-space structure on 𝕜 (it doesn't have to be the Borel sigma-algebra of
a topology); but it seems hard to imagine cases where this extra generality would be useful, and
allowing it would complicate matters in the most important use cases.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [IsTopologicalRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
[TopologicalSpace W] {e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊} {μ : Measure V} {L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜}
/-- For any `w`, the Fourier integral is convergent iff `f` is integrable. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_convergent_iff (he : Continuous e)
(hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2) {f : V → E} (w : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ e (-L v w) • f v) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
-- first prove one-way implication
have aux {g : V → E} (hg : Integrable g μ) (x : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ e (-L v x) • g v) μ := by
have c : Continuous fun v ↦ e (-L v x) := he.comp (hL.comp (.prodMk_left _)).neg
simp_rw [← integrable_norm_iff (c.aestronglyMeasurable.smul hg.1), Circle.norm_smul]
exact hg.norm
-- then use it for both directions
refine ⟨fun hf ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ aux hf w⟩
have := aux hf (-w)
simp_rw [← mul_smul (e _) (e _) (f _), ← e.map_add_eq_mul, LinearMap.map_neg, neg_add_cancel,
e.map_zero_eq_one, one_smul] at this -- the `(e _)` speeds up elaboration considerably
exact this
theorem fourierIntegral_add (he : Continuous e) (hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2)
{f g : V → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (f + g) = fourierIntegral e μ L f + fourierIntegral e μ L g := by
ext1 w
dsimp only [Pi.add_apply, fourierIntegral]
simp_rw [smul_add]
rw [integral_add]
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he hL w).2 hf
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he hL w).2 hg
/-- The Fourier integral of an `L^1` function is a continuous function. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_continuous [FirstCountableTopology W] (he : Continuous e)
(hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2) {f : V → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Continuous (fourierIntegral e μ L f) := by
apply continuous_of_dominated
· exact fun w ↦ ((fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he hL w).2 hf).1
· exact fun w ↦ ae_of_all _ fun v ↦ le_of_eq (Circle.norm_smul _ _)
· exact hf.norm
· refine ae_of_all _ fun v ↦ (he.comp ?_).smul continuous_const
exact (hL.comp (.prodMk_right _)).neg
end Continuous
section Fubini
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [IsTopologicalRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
[TopologicalSpace W] [MeasurableSpace W] [BorelSpace W]
{e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊} {μ : Measure V} {L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜}
{ν : Measure W} [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] [SecondCountableTopology V]
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace F]
/-- The Fourier transform satisfies `∫ 𝓕 f * g = ∫ f * 𝓕 g`, i.e., it is self-adjoint.
Version where the multiplication is replaced by a general bilinear form `M`. -/
theorem integral_bilin_fourierIntegral_eq_flip
{f : V → E} {g : W → F} (M : E →L[ℂ] F →L[ℂ] G) (he : Continuous e)
(hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g ν) :
∫ ξ, M (fourierIntegral e μ L f ξ) (g ξ) ∂ν =
∫ x, M (f x) (fourierIntegral e ν L.flip g x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap; · simp [integral, hG]
calc
_ = ∫ ξ, M.flip (g ξ) (∫ x, e (-L x ξ) • f x ∂μ) ∂ν := rfl
_ = ∫ ξ, (∫ x, M.flip (g ξ) (e (-L x ξ) • f x) ∂μ) ∂ν := by
congr with ξ
apply (ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm _ _).symm
exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he hL _).2 hf
_ = ∫ x, (∫ ξ, M.flip (g ξ) (e (-L x ξ) • f x) ∂ν) ∂μ := by
rw [integral_integral_swap]
have : Integrable (fun (p : W × V) ↦ ‖M‖ * (‖g p.1‖ * ‖f p.2‖)) (ν.prod μ) :=
(hg.norm.mul_prod hf.norm).const_mul _
apply this.mono
· -- This proof can be golfed but becomes very slow; breaking it up into steps
-- speeds up compilation.
change AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : W × V ↦ (M (e (-(L p.2) p.1) • f p.2) (g p.1))) _
have A : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun (p : W × V) ↦ e (-L p.2 p.1) • f p.2) (ν.prod μ) := by
refine (Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable ?_).smul hf.1.snd
exact he.comp (hL.comp continuous_swap).neg
have A' : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p ↦ (g p.1, e (-(L p.2) p.1) • f p.2) : W × V → F × E)
(Measure.prod ν μ) := hg.1.fst.prodMk A
have B : Continuous (fun q ↦ M q.2 q.1 : F × E → G) := M.flip.continuous₂
apply B.comp_aestronglyMeasurable A' -- `exact` works, but `apply` is 10x faster!
· filter_upwards with ⟨ξ, x⟩
rw [Function.uncurry_apply_pair, Submonoid.smul_def, (M.flip (g ξ)).map_smul,
← Submonoid.smul_def, Circle.norm_smul, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply,
norm_mul, norm_norm M, norm_mul, norm_norm, norm_norm, mul_comm (‖g _‖), ← mul_assoc]
exact M.le_opNorm₂ (f x) (g ξ)
_ = ∫ x, (∫ ξ, M (f x) (e (-L.flip ξ x) • g ξ) ∂ν) ∂μ := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul_of_tower,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.flip_apply]
_ = ∫ x, M (f x) (∫ ξ, e (-L.flip ξ x) • g ξ ∂ν) ∂μ := by
congr with x
apply ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm
apply (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he _ _).2 hg
exact hL.comp continuous_swap
/-- The Fourier transform satisfies `∫ 𝓕 f * g = ∫ f * 𝓕 g`, i.e., it is self-adjoint. -/
theorem integral_fourierIntegral_smul_eq_flip
{f : V → ℂ} {g : W → F} (he : Continuous e)
(hL : Continuous fun p : V × W ↦ L p.1 p.2) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g ν) :
∫ ξ, (fourierIntegral e μ L f ξ) • (g ξ) ∂ν =
∫ x, (f x) • (fourierIntegral e ν L.flip g x) ∂μ :=
integral_bilin_fourierIntegral_eq_flip (ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℂ ℂ) he hL hf hg
end Fubini
lemma fourierIntegral_probChar {V W : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace V}
[AddCommGroup V] [Module ℝ V] [AddCommGroup W] [Module ℝ W]
(L : V →ₗ[ℝ] W →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) (μ : Measure V) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
fourierIntegral Real.probChar μ L f w =
∫ v : V, Complex.exp (- L v w * Complex.I) • f v ∂μ := by
simp_rw [fourierIntegral, Circle.smul_def, Real.probChar_apply, Complex.ofReal_neg]
end VectorFourier
namespace VectorFourier
variable {𝕜 ι E F V W : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace 𝕜 W]
{e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊} {μ : Measure V} {L : V →L[𝕜] W →L[𝕜] 𝕜}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
{M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace ℝ (M i)]
theorem fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply
{f : V → (F →L[ℝ] E)} {a : F} {w : W} (he : Continuous e) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L.toLinearMap₂ f w a =
fourierIntegral e μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun x ↦ f x a) w := by
rw [fourierIntegral, ContinuousLinearMap.integral_apply]
· rfl
· apply (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he _ _).2 hf
exact L.continuous₂
theorem fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply
{f : V → (ContinuousMultilinearMap ℝ M E)} {m : (i : ι) → M i} {w : W} (he : Continuous e)
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L.toLinearMap₂ f w m =
fourierIntegral e μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun x ↦ f x m) w := by
rw [fourierIntegral, ContinuousMultilinearMap.integral_apply]
· rfl
· apply (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff he _ _).2 hf
exact L.continuous₂
end VectorFourier
/-! ## Fourier theory for functions on `𝕜` -/
namespace Fourier
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℂ E]
section Defs
/-- The Fourier transform integral for `f : 𝕜 → E`, with respect to the measure `μ` and additive
character `e`. -/
def fourierIntegral (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure 𝕜) (f : 𝕜 → E) (w : 𝕜) : E :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral e μ (LinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝕜) f w
theorem fourierIntegral_def (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure 𝕜) (f : 𝕜 → E) (w : 𝕜) :
fourierIntegral e μ f w = ∫ v : 𝕜, e (-(v * w)) • f v ∂μ :=
rfl
theorem fourierIntegral_const_smul (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure 𝕜) (f : 𝕜 → E) (r : ℂ) :
fourierIntegral e μ (r • f) = r • fourierIntegral e μ f :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_const_smul _ _ _ _ _
/-- The uniform norm of the Fourier transform of `f` is bounded by the `L¹` norm of `f`. -/
theorem norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure 𝕜)
(f : 𝕜 → E) (w : 𝕜) : ‖fourierIntegral e μ f w‖ ≤ ∫ x : 𝕜, ‖f x‖ ∂μ :=
VectorFourier.norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm _ _ _ _ _
/-- The Fourier transform converts right-translation into scalar multiplication by a phase
factor. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_comp_add_right [MeasurableAdd 𝕜] (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure 𝕜)
[μ.IsAddRightInvariant] (f : 𝕜 → E) (v₀ : 𝕜) :
fourierIntegral e μ (f ∘ fun v ↦ v + v₀) = fun w ↦ e (v₀ * w) • fourierIntegral e μ f w :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_comp_add_right _ _ _ _ _
end Defs
end Fourier
open scoped Real
namespace Real
open FourierTransform
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
theorem vector_fourierIntegral_eq_integral_exp_smul {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module ℝ V]
[MeasurableSpace V] {W : Type*} [AddCommGroup W] [Module ℝ W] (L : V →ₗ[ℝ] W →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ)
(μ : Measure V) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral fourierChar μ L f w =
∫ v : V, Complex.exp (↑(-2 * π * L v w) * Complex.I) • f v ∂μ := by
simp_rw [VectorFourier.fourierIntegral, Circle.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, mul_neg,
neg_mul]
/-- The Fourier integral is well defined iff the function is integrable. Version with a general
continuous bilinear function `L`. For the specialization to the inner product in an inner product
space, see `Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] {μ : Measure V}
{f : V → E} (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (w : W) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ 𝐞 (- L v w) • f v) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff (E := E) (L := L.toLinearMap₂)
continuous_fourierChar L.continuous₂ _
section Apply
variable {ι F V W : Type*} [Fintype ι]
[NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W]
{μ : Measure V} {L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
{M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace ℝ (M i)]
theorem fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply'
{f : V → (F →L[ℝ] E)} {a : F} {w : W} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f w a =
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun x ↦ f x a) w :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply continuous_fourierChar hf
theorem fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply'
{f : V → ContinuousMultilinearMap ℝ M E} {m : (i : ι) → M i} {w : W} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f w m =
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun x ↦ f x m) w :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply continuous_fourierChar hf
end Apply
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
{W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup W]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ W] [MeasurableSpace W] [BorelSpace W] [FiniteDimensional ℝ W]
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
@[simp] theorem fourierIntegral_convergent_iff {μ : Measure V} {f : V → E} (w : V) :
Integrable (fun v : V ↦ 𝐞 (- ⟪v, w⟫) • f v) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' (innerSL ℝ) w
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
/-- The Fourier transform of a function on an inner product space, with respect to the standard
additive character `ω ↦ exp (2 i π ω)`.
Denoted as `𝓕` within the `Real.FourierTransform` namespace. -/
def fourierIntegral (f : V → E) (w : V) : E :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral 𝐞 volume (innerₗ V) f w
/-- The inverse Fourier transform of a function on an inner product space, defined as the Fourier
transform but with opposite sign in the exponential.
Denoted as `𝓕⁻¹` within the `Real.FourierTransform` namespace. -/
def fourierIntegralInv (f : V → E) (w : V) : E :=
VectorFourier.fourierIntegral 𝐞 volume (-innerₗ V) f w
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FourierTransform] notation "𝓕" => Real.fourierIntegral
@[inherit_doc] scoped[FourierTransform] notation "𝓕⁻" => Real.fourierIntegralInv
lemma fourierIntegral_eq (f : V → E) (w : V) :
𝓕 f w = ∫ v, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v := rfl
lemma fourierIntegral_eq' (f : V → E) (w : V) :
𝓕 f w = ∫ v, Complex.exp ((↑(-2 * π * ⟪v, w⟫) * Complex.I)) • f v := by
simp_rw [fourierIntegral_eq, Circle.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, mul_neg, neg_mul]
lemma fourierIntegralInv_eq (f : V → E) (w : V) :
𝓕⁻ f w = ∫ v, 𝐞 ⟪v, w⟫ • f v := by
simp [fourierIntegralInv, VectorFourier.fourierIntegral]
lemma fourierIntegralInv_eq' (f : V → E) (w : V) :
𝓕⁻ f w = ∫ v, Complex.exp ((↑(2 * π * ⟪v, w⟫) * Complex.I)) • f v := by
simp_rw [fourierIntegralInv_eq, Circle.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply]
lemma fourierIntegral_comp_linearIsometry (A : W ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
𝓕 (f ∘ A) w = (𝓕 f) (A w) := by
simp only [fourierIntegral_eq, ← A.inner_map_map, Function.comp_apply,
← MeasurePreserving.integral_comp A.measurePreserving A.toHomeomorph.measurableEmbedding]
lemma fourierIntegralInv_eq_fourierIntegral_neg (f : V → E) (w : V) :
𝓕⁻ f w = 𝓕 f (-w) := by
simp [fourierIntegral_eq, fourierIntegralInv_eq]
lemma fourierIntegralInv_eq_fourierIntegral_comp_neg (f : V → E) :
𝓕⁻ f = 𝓕 (fun x ↦ f (-x)) := by
ext y
rw [fourierIntegralInv_eq_fourierIntegral_neg]
change 𝓕 f (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ y) = 𝓕 (f ∘ LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) y
exact (fourierIntegral_comp_linearIsometry _ _ _).symm
lemma fourierIntegralInv_comm (f : V → E) :
𝓕 (𝓕⁻ f) = 𝓕⁻ (𝓕 f) := by
conv_rhs => rw [fourierIntegralInv_eq_fourierIntegral_comp_neg]
simp_rw [← fourierIntegralInv_eq_fourierIntegral_neg]
lemma fourierIntegralInv_comp_linearIsometry (A : W ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
𝓕⁻ (f ∘ A) w = (𝓕⁻ f) (A w) := by
simp [fourierIntegralInv_eq_fourierIntegral_neg, fourierIntegral_comp_linearIsometry]
theorem fourierIntegral_real_eq (f : ℝ → E) (w : ℝ) :
fourierIntegral f w = ∫ v : ℝ, 𝐞 (-(v * w)) • f v := by
simp_rw [mul_comm _ w]
rfl
theorem fourierIntegral_real_eq_integral_exp_smul (f : ℝ → E) (w : ℝ) :
𝓕 f w = ∫ v : ℝ, Complex.exp (↑(-2 * π * v * w) * Complex.I) • f v := by
simp_rw [fourierIntegral_real_eq, Circle.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, mul_neg, neg_mul,
mul_assoc]
theorem fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
{f : V → (F →L[ℝ] E)} {a : F} {v : V} (hf : Integrable f) :
𝓕 f v a = 𝓕 (fun x ↦ f x a) v :=
fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' (L := innerSL ℝ) hf
| theorem fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace ℝ (M i)]
{f : V → ContinuousMultilinearMap ℝ M E} {m : (i : ι) → M i} {v : V} (hf : Integrable f) :
𝓕 f v m = 𝓕 (fun x ↦ f x m) v :=
fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' (L := innerSL ℝ) hf
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransform.lean | 437 | 442 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.MapComap
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Convergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.PartitionFiltration
/-!
# Kernel density
Let `κ : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `ν : Kernel α γ` be two finite kernels with `Kernel.fst κ ≤ ν`,
where `γ` has a countably generated σ-algebra (true in particular for standard Borel spaces).
We build a function `density κ ν : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` jointly measurable in the first two arguments
such that for all `a : α` and all measurable sets `s : Set β` and `A : Set γ`,
`∫ x in A, density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s)`.
There are two main applications of this construction.
* Disintegration of kernels: for `κ : Kernel α (γ × β)`, we want to build a kernel
`η : Kernel (α × γ) β` such that `κ = fst κ ⊗ₖ η`. For `β = ℝ`, we can use the density of `κ`
with respect to `fst κ` for intervals to build a kernel cumulative distribution function for `η`.
The construction can then be extended to `β` standard Borel.
* Radon-Nikodym theorem for kernels: for `κ ν : Kernel α γ`, we can use the density to build a
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `κ` with respect to `ν`. We don't need `β` here but we can apply the
density construction to `β = Unit`. The derivative construction will use `density` but will not
be exactly equal to it because we will want to remove the `fst κ ≤ ν` assumption.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.density`: for `κ : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `ν : Kernel α γ` two finite
kernels, `Kernel.density κ ν` is a function `α → γ → Set β → ℝ`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.setIntegral_density`: for all measurable sets `A : Set γ` and
`s : Set β`, `∫ x in A, Kernel.density κ ν a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurable_density`: the function
`p : α × γ ↦ Kernel.density κ ν p.1 p.2 s` is measurable.
## Construction of the density
If we were interested only in a fixed `a : α`, then we could use the Radon-Nikodym derivative to
build the density function `density κ ν`, as follows.
```
def density' (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : kernel a γ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) : ℝ :=
(((κ a).restrict (univ ×ˢ s)).fst.rnDeriv (ν a) x).toReal
```
However, we can't turn those functions for each `a` into a measurable function of the pair `(a, x)`.
In order to obtain measurability through countability, we use the fact that the measurable space `γ`
is countably generated. For each `n : ℕ`, we define (in the file
`Mathlib.Probability.Process.PartitionFiltration`) a finite partition of `γ`, such that those
partitions are finer as `n` grows, and the σ-algebra generated by the union of all partitions is the
σ-algebra of `γ`. For `x : γ`, `countablePartitionSet n x` denotes the set in the partition such
that `x ∈ countablePartitionSet n x`.
For a given `n`, the function `densityProcess κ ν n : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` defined by
`fun a x s ↦ (κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n x)).toReal` has
the desired property that `∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a (A ×ˢ s)).toReal` for
all `A` in the σ-algebra generated by the partition at scale `n` and is measurable in `(a, x)`.
`countableFiltration γ` is the filtration of those σ-algebras for all `n : ℕ`.
The functions `densityProcess κ ν n` described here are a bounded `ν`-martingale for the filtration
`countableFiltration γ`. By Doob's martingale L1 convergence theorem, that martingale converges to
a limit, which has a product-measurable version and satisfies the integral equality for all `A` in
`⨆ n, countableFiltration γ n`. Finally, the partitions were chosen such that that supremum is equal
to the σ-algebra on `γ`, hence the equality holds for all measurable sets.
We have obtained the desired density function.
## References
The construction of the density process in this file follows the proof of Theorem 9.27 in
[O. Kallenberg, Foundations of modern probability][kallenberg2021], adapted to use a countably
generated hypothesis instead of specializing to `ℝ`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α β γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ}
[CountablyGenerated γ] {κ : Kernel α (γ × β)} {ν : Kernel α γ}
section DensityProcess
/-- An `ℕ`-indexed martingale that is a density for `κ` with respect to `ν` on the sets in
`countablePartition γ n`. Used to define its limit `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.density`, which is
a density for those kernels for all measurable sets. -/
noncomputable
def densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
ℝ :=
(κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n x)).toReal
lemma densityProcess_def (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
(fun t ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a t s)
= fun t ↦ (κ a (countablePartitionSet n t ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n t)).toReal :=
rfl
lemma measurable_densityProcess_countableFiltration_aux (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
(n : ℕ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable[mα.prod (countableFiltration γ n)] (fun (p : α × γ) ↦
κ p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2)) := by
change Measurable[mα.prod (countableFiltration γ n)]
((fun (p : α × countablePartition γ n) ↦ κ p.1 (↑p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 p.2)
∘ (fun (p : α × γ) ↦ (p.1, ⟨countablePartitionSet n p.2, countablePartitionSet_mem n p.2⟩)))
have h1 : @Measurable _ _ (mα.prod ⊤) _
(fun p : α × countablePartition γ n ↦ κ p.1 (↑p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 p.2) := by
refine Measurable.div ?_ ?_
· refine measurable_from_prod_countable (fun t ↦ ?_)
exact Kernel.measurable_coe _ ((measurableSet_countablePartition _ t.prop).prod hs)
· refine measurable_from_prod_countable ?_
rintro ⟨t, ht⟩
exact Kernel.measurable_coe _ (measurableSet_countablePartition _ ht)
refine h1.comp (measurable_fst.prodMk ?_)
change @Measurable (α × γ) (countablePartition γ n) (mα.prod (countableFiltration γ n)) ⊤
((fun c ↦ ⟨countablePartitionSet n c, countablePartitionSet_mem n c⟩) ∘ (fun p : α × γ ↦ p.2))
exact (measurable_countablePartitionSet_subtype n ⊤).comp measurable_snd
lemma measurable_densityProcess_aux (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × γ) ↦
κ p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2 ×ˢ s) / ν p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2)) := by
refine Measurable.mono (measurable_densityProcess_countableFiltration_aux κ ν n hs) ?_ le_rfl
exact sup_le_sup le_rfl (comap_mono ((countableFiltration γ).le _))
lemma measurable_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun (p : α × γ) ↦ densityProcess κ ν n p.1 p.2 s) :=
(measurable_densityProcess_aux κ ν n hs).ennreal_toReal
-- The following two lemmas also work without the `( :)`, but they are slow.
lemma measurable_densityProcess_left (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
(x : γ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun a ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
((measurable_densityProcess κ ν n hs).comp (measurable_id.prodMk measurable_const):)
lemma measurable_densityProcess_right (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
{s : Set β} (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
((measurable_densityProcess κ ν n hs).comp (measurable_const.prodMk measurable_id):)
lemma measurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable[countableFiltration γ n] (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) := by
refine @Measurable.ennreal_toReal _ (countableFiltration γ n) _ ?_
exact (measurable_densityProcess_countableFiltration_aux κ ν n hs).comp measurable_prodMk_left
lemma stronglyMeasurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ)
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
StronglyMeasurable[countableFiltration γ n] (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
(measurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess κ ν n a hs).stronglyMeasurable
lemma adapted_densityProcess (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (a : α)
{s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Adapted (countableFiltration γ) (fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) :=
fun n ↦ stronglyMeasurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess κ ν n a hs
lemma densityProcess_nonneg (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ)
(a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
0 ≤ densityProcess κ ν n a x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
lemma meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ)
(s : Set β) :
κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) := by
calc κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s)
≤ fst κ a (countablePartitionSet n x) := by
rw [fst_apply' _ _ (measurableSet_countablePartitionSet _ _)]
refine measure_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_prod, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp]
exact fun h _ ↦ h
_ ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) := hκν a _
lemma densityProcess_le_one (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
densityProcess κ ν n a x s ≤ 1 := by
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal zero_le_one (ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_mul]
exact meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκν n a x s
lemma eLpNorm_densityProcess_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
eLpNorm (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) 1 (ν a) ≤ ν a univ := by
refine (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound (C := 1) (ae_of_all _ (fun x ↦ ?_))).trans ?_
· simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (densityProcess_nonneg κ ν n a x s),
densityProcess_le_one hκν n a x s]
· simp
lemma integrable_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν] (n : ℕ)
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (ν a) := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
refine ⟨Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable ?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_densityProcess_right κ ν n a hs
· exact (eLpNorm_densityProcess_le hκν n a s).trans_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)
lemma setIntegral_densityProcess_of_mem (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [hν : IsFiniteKernel ν]
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {u : Set γ}
(hu : u ∈ countablePartition γ n) :
∫ x in u, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (u ×ˢ s) := by
have : IsFiniteKernel κ := isFiniteKernel_of_isFiniteKernel_fst (h := isFiniteKernel_of_le hκν)
have hu_meas : MeasurableSet u := measurableSet_countablePartition n hu
simp_rw [densityProcess]
rw [integral_toReal]
rotate_left
· refine Measurable.aemeasurable ?_
change Measurable ((fun (p : α × _) ↦ κ p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2 ×ˢ s)
/ ν p.1 (countablePartitionSet n p.2)) ∘ (fun x ↦ (a, x)))
exact (measurable_densityProcess_aux κ ν n hs).comp measurable_prodMk_left
· refine ae_of_all _ (fun x ↦ ?_)
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· suffices κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) = 0 by simp [h0, this]
have h0' : fst κ a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0 :=
le_antisymm ((hκν a _).trans h0.le) zero_le'
rw [fst_apply' _ _ (measurableSet_countablePartitionSet _ _)] at h0'
refine measure_mono_null (fun x ↦ ?_) h0'
simp only [mem_prod, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp]
exact fun h _ ↦ h
· exact ENNReal.div_lt_top (measure_ne_top _ _) h0
congr
have : ∫⁻ x in u, κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) / ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) ∂(ν a)
= ∫⁻ _ in u, κ a (u ×ˢ s) / ν a u ∂(ν a) := by
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hu_meas (ae_of_all _ (fun t ht ↦ ?_))
rw [countablePartitionSet_of_mem hu ht]
rw [this]
simp only [MeasureTheory.lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
by_cases h0 : ν a u = 0
· simp only [h0, mul_zero]
have h0' : fst κ a u = 0 := le_antisymm ((hκν a _).trans h0.le) zero_le'
rw [fst_apply' _ _ hu_meas] at h0'
refine (measure_mono_null ?_ h0').symm
intro p
simp only [mem_prod, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp]
exact fun h _ ↦ h
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0, mul_one]
exact measure_ne_top _ _
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
lemma setIntegral_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {A : Set γ}
(hA : MeasurableSet[countableFiltration γ n] A) :
∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s) := by
have : IsFiniteKernel κ := isFiniteKernel_of_isFiniteKernel_fst (h := isFiniteKernel_of_le hκν)
obtain ⟨S, hS_subset, rfl⟩ := (measurableSet_generateFrom_countablePartition_iff _ _).mp hA
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
have h_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun i : S ↦ (i : Set γ)) := by
intro u v huv
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16
Previously `Function.onFun` unfolded in the following `simp only`,
but now needs a `rw`.
This may be a bug: a no import minimization may be required.
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Function.onFun] -/
rw [Function.onFun]
refine disjoint_countablePartition (hS_subset (by simp)) (hS_subset (by simp)) ?_
rwa [ne_eq, ← Subtype.ext_iff]
rw [integral_iUnion, iUnion_prod_const, measureReal_def, measure_iUnion,
ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq (fun _ ↦ measure_ne_top _ _)]
· congr with u
rw [setIntegral_densityProcess_of_mem hκν _ _ hs (hS_subset (by simp))]
rfl
· intro u v huv
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe, Set.disjoint_prod, disjoint_self, bot_eq_empty]
exact Or.inl (h_disj huv)
· exact fun _ ↦ (measurableSet_countablePartition n (hS_subset (by simp))).prod hs
· exact fun _ ↦ measurableSet_countablePartition n (hS_subset (by simp))
· exact h_disj
· exact (integrable_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs).integrableOn
lemma integral_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(n : ℕ) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x, densityProcess κ ν n a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (univ ×ˢ s) := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs MeasurableSet.univ]
lemma setIntegral_densityProcess_of_le (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν)
[IsFiniteKernel ν] {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{A : Set γ} (hA : MeasurableSet[countableFiltration γ n] A) :
∫ x in A, densityProcess κ ν m a x s ∂(ν a) = (κ a).real (A ×ˢ s) :=
setIntegral_densityProcess hκν m a hs ((countableFiltration γ).mono hnm A hA)
lemma condExp_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
{i j : ℕ} (hij : i ≤ j) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(ν a)[fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν j a x s | countableFiltration γ i]
=ᵐ[ν a] fun x ↦ densityProcess κ ν i a x s := by
refine (ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· exact integrable_densityProcess hκν j a hs
· exact fun _ _ _ ↦ (integrable_densityProcess hκν _ _ hs).integrableOn
· intro x hx _
rw [setIntegral_densityProcess hκν i a hs hx,
setIntegral_densityProcess_of_le hκν hij a hs hx]
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(stronglyMeasurable_countableFiltration_densityProcess κ ν i a hs)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_densityProcess := condExp_densityProcess
lemma martingale_densityProcess (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) [IsFiniteKernel ν]
(a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Martingale (fun n x ↦ densityProcess κ ν n a x s) (countableFiltration γ) (ν a) :=
⟨adapted_densityProcess κ ν a hs, fun _ _ h ↦ condExp_densityProcess hκν h a hs⟩
lemma densityProcess_mono_set (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ)
{s s' : Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
densityProcess κ ν n a x s ≤ densityProcess κ ν n a x s' := by
unfold densityProcess
obtain h₀ | h₀ := eq_or_ne (ν a (countablePartitionSet n x)) 0
· simp [h₀]
· gcongr
simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top, h₀, and_false, false_or, not_and, not_not]
exact eq_top_mono (meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκν n a x s')
lemma densityProcess_mono_kernel_left {κ' : Kernel α (γ × β)} (hκκ' : κ ≤ κ')
(hκ'ν : fst κ' ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
densityProcess κ ν n a x s ≤ densityProcess κ' ν n a x s := by
unfold densityProcess
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· rw [h0, ENNReal.toReal_div, ENNReal.toReal_div]
simp
have h_le : κ' a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) :=
meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκ'ν n a x s
gcongr
· simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top, h0, and_false, false_or, not_and, not_not]
| exact fun h_top ↦ eq_top_mono h_le h_top
· apply hκκ'
lemma densityProcess_antitone_kernel_right {ν' : Kernel α γ}
(hνν' : ν ≤ ν') (hκν : fst κ ≤ ν) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) (s : Set β) :
densityProcess κ ν' n a x s ≤ densityProcess κ ν n a x s := by
unfold densityProcess
have h_le : κ a (countablePartitionSet n x ×ˢ s) ≤ ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) :=
meas_countablePartitionSet_le_of_fst_le hκν n a x s
by_cases h0 : ν a (countablePartitionSet n x) = 0
· simp [le_antisymm (h_le.trans h0.le) zero_le', h0]
gcongr
· simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.div_eq_top, h0, and_false, false_or, not_and, not_not]
exact fun h_top ↦ eq_top_mono h_le h_top
· apply hνν'
@[simp]
lemma densityProcess_empty (κ : Kernel α (γ × β)) (ν : Kernel α γ) (n : ℕ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
densityProcess κ ν n a x ∅ = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Density.lean | 322 | 340 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma nnnorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖₊ = ‖z‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma enorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ₑ = ‖z‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
instance (priority := 100) : CStarRing K where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| ((norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_conj _)).symm
instance : StarModule ℝ K where
star_smul r a := by
apply RCLike.ext <;> simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im]
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ((q : ℝ) : K) = q := map_nnratCast (algebraMap ℝ K) _
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
natCast_re n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (ofNat(n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
theorem ofNat_mul_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
re (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * re z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, re_ofReal_mul]
theorem ofNat_mul_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
im (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * im z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_intCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_im]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ratCast (n : ℚ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_ratCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : re (q : K) = q := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : im (q : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_im]
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ‖(r : K)‖ = r :=
(norm_ofReal _).trans (abs_of_nonneg h)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖ = n := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast]
exact norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg n)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖₊ = n := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖ = ofNat(n) :=
norm_natCast n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖₊ = ofNat(n) :=
nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖ = 2 := norm_ofNat 2
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖₊ = 2 := nnnorm_ofNat 2
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖ = q := by
rw [← ofReal_nnratCast]; exact norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm]
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) : ‖n • x‖ = n • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using norm_smul (n : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
‖n • x‖₊ = n • ‖x‖₊ := by simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using nnnorm_smul (n : K) x
section NormedField
variable [NormedField E] [CharZero E] [NormedSpace K E]
include K
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖ = q • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using norm_smul (q : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖₊ = q • ‖x‖₊ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using nnnorm_smul (q : K) x
@[bound]
lemma norm_expect_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → E} : ‖𝔼 i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ 𝔼 i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
Finset.le_expect_of_subadditive norm_zero norm_add_le fun _ _ ↦ by rw [norm_nnqsmul K]
end NormedField
theorem mul_self_norm (z : K) : ‖z‖ * ‖z‖ = normSq z := by rw [normSq_eq_def', sq]
attribute [rclike_simps] norm_zero norm_one norm_eq_zero abs_norm norm_inv norm_div
theorem abs_re_le_norm (z : K) : |re z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply re_sq_le_normSq
theorem abs_im_le_norm (z : K) : |im z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply im_sq_le_normSq
theorem norm_re_le_norm (z : K) : ‖re z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_re_le_norm z
theorem norm_im_le_norm (z : K) : ‖im z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_im_le_norm z
theorem re_le_norm (z : K) : re z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_re_le_norm z)).2
theorem im_le_norm (z : K) : im z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_le_norm _)).2
theorem im_eq_zero_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : im a = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_self_norm a, normSq_apply, left_eq_add, mul_self_eq_zero]
using congr_arg (fun z => z * z) ((re_le_norm a).antisymm h)
theorem re_eq_self_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : (re a : K) = a := by
rw [← conj_eq_iff_re, conj_eq_iff_im, im_eq_zero_of_le h]
open IsAbsoluteValue
theorem abs_re_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |re z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_re_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem abs_im_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |im z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_im_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem norm_I_of_ne_zero (hI : (I : K) ≠ 0) : ‖(I : K)‖ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg I) zero_le_one, one_mul, ← norm_mul,
I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI, norm_neg, norm_one]
theorem re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (x : K) : re (x * conj x) = ‖x * conj x‖ := by
rw [mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow]; simp [-map_pow]
theorem norm_sq_re_add_conj (x : K) : ‖x + conj x‖ ^ 2 = re (x + conj x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_conj, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_mul, norm_ofReal, sq_abs, ofReal_re]
theorem norm_sq_re_conj_add (x : K) : ‖conj x + x‖ ^ 2 = re (conj x + x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_comm, norm_sq_re_add_conj]
/-! ### Cauchy sequences -/
theorem isCauSeq_re (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => re (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_re_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
theorem isCauSeq_im (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => im (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_im_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
/-- The real part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqRe (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_re f⟩
/-- The imaginary part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqIm (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_im f⟩
theorem isCauSeq_norm {f : ℕ → K} (hf : IsCauSeq norm f) : IsCauSeq abs (norm ∘ f) := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf ε ε0
⟨i, fun j hj => lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_norm_sub_norm_le _ _) (hi j hj)⟩
end RCLike
section Instances
noncomputable instance Real.instRCLike : RCLike ℝ where
re := AddMonoidHom.id ℝ
im := 0
I := 0
I_re_ax := by simp only [AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
I_mul_I_ax := Or.intro_left _ rfl
re_add_im_ax z := by
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, RingHom.id_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
ofReal_re_ax _ := rfl
ofReal_im_ax _ := rfl
mul_re_ax z w := by simp only [sub_zero, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_ax z w := by simp only [add_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_re_ax z := by simp only [starRingEnd_apply, star_id_of_comm]
conj_im_ax _ := by simp only [neg_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_I_ax := by simp only [RingHom.map_zero, neg_zero]
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := by simp only [sq, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← abs_mul, abs_mul_self z, add_zero,
mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_I_ax _ := by simp only [mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
le_iff_re_im := (and_iff_left rfl).symm
end Instances
namespace RCLike
section Order
open scoped ComplexOrder
variable {z w : K}
theorem lt_iff_re_im : z < w ↔ re z < re w ∧ im z = im w := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, @RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, heq⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, mt (fun hreq => ext hreq hi) heq⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hrn⟩, hi⟩
| exact ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, ne_of_apply_ne _ hrn⟩
theorem nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 759 | 761 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 3,178 | 3,182 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
/-!
# Pell's equation and Matiyasevic's theorem
This file solves Pell's equation, i.e. integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`
*in the special case that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`*.
This is then applied to prove Matiyasevic's theorem that the power
function is Diophantine, which is the last key ingredient in the solution to Hilbert's tenth
problem. For the definition of Diophantine function, see `NumberTheory.Dioph`.
For results on Pell's equation for arbitrary (positive, non-square) `d`, see
`NumberTheory.Pell`.
## Main definition
* `pell` is a function assigning to a natural number `n` the `n`-th solution to Pell's equation
constructed recursively from the initial solution `(0, 1)`.
## Main statements
* `eq_pell` shows that every solution to Pell's equation is recursively obtained using `pell`
* `matiyasevic` shows that a certain system of Diophantine equations has a solution if and only if
the first variable is the `x`-component in a solution to Pell's equation - the key step towards
Hilbert's tenth problem in Davis' version of Matiyasevic's theorem.
* `eq_pow_of_pell` shows that the power function is Diophantine.
## Implementation notes
The proof of Matiyasevic's theorem doesn't follow Matiyasevic's original account of using Fibonacci
numbers but instead Davis' variant of using solutions to Pell's equation.
## References
* [M. Carneiro, _A Lean formalization of Matiyasevič's theorem_][carneiro2018matiyasevic]
* [M. Davis, _Hilbert's tenth problem is unsolvable_][MR317916]
## Tags
Pell's equation, Matiyasevic's theorem, Hilbert's tenth problem
-/
namespace Pell
open Nat
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- The property of being a solution to the Pell equation, expressed
as a property of elements of `ℤ√d`. -/
def IsPell : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨x, y⟩ => x * x - d * y * y = 1
theorem isPell_norm : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b * star b = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff, IsPell, mul_comm]; ring_nf
theorem isPell_iff_mem_unitary : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b ∈ unitary (ℤ√d)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [unitary.mem_iff, isPell_norm, mul_comm (star _), and_self_iff]
theorem isPell_mul {b c : ℤ√d} (hb : IsPell b) (hc : IsPell c) : IsPell (b * c) :=
isPell_norm.2 (by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm c, mul_assoc,
star_mul, isPell_norm.1 hb, isPell_norm.1 hc])
theorem isPell_star : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ IsPell (star b)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [IsPell, Zsqrtd.star_mk]
end
section
variable {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a)
private def d (_a1 : 1 < a) :=
a * a - 1
@[simp]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d a1 :=
tsub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) (by decide) (Nat.zero_le _) : 1 * 1 < a * a)
-- TODO(lint): Fix double namespace issue
/-- The Pell sequences, i.e. the sequence of integer solutions to `x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1`, where
`d = a ^ 2 - 1`, defined together in mutual recursion. -/
--@[nolint dup_namespace]
def pell : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
| 0 => (1, 0)
| n+1 => ((pell n).1 * a + d a1 * (pell n).2, (pell n).1 + (pell n).2 * a)
/-- The Pell `x` sequence. -/
def xn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).1
/-- The Pell `y` sequence. -/
def yn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).2
@[simp]
theorem pell_val (n : ℕ) : pell a1 n = (xn a1 n, yn a1 n) :=
show pell a1 n = ((pell a1 n).1, (pell a1 n).2) from
match pell a1 n with
| (_, _) => rfl
@[simp]
theorem xn_zero : xn a1 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yn_zero : yn a1 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem xn_succ (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n * a + d a1 * yn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yn_succ (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n + yn a1 n * a :=
rfl
theorem xn_one : xn a1 1 = a := by simp
theorem yn_one : yn a1 1 = 1 := by simp
/-- The Pell `x` sequence, considered as an integer sequence. -/
def xz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
xn a1 n
/-- The Pell `y` sequence, considered as an integer sequence. -/
def yz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
yn a1 n
section
/-- The element `a` such that `d = a ^ 2 - 1`, considered as an integer. -/
def az (a : ℕ) : ℤ :=
a
end
include a1 in
theorem asq_pos : 0 < a * a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1)
(by have := @Nat.mul_le_mul_left 1 a a (le_of_lt a1); rwa [mul_one] at this)
theorem dz_val : ↑(d a1) = az a * az a - 1 :=
have : 1 ≤ a * a := asq_pos a1
by rw [Pell.d, Int.ofNat_sub this]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem xz_succ (n : ℕ) : (xz a1 (n + 1)) = xz a1 n * az a + d a1 * yz a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem yz_succ (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n + yz a1 n * az a :=
rfl
/-- The Pell sequence can also be viewed as an element of `ℤ√d` -/
def pellZd (n : ℕ) : ℤ√(d a1) :=
⟨xn a1 n, yn a1 n⟩
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_re (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).re = xn a1 n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_im (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).im = yn a1 n :=
rfl
theorem isPell_nat {x y : ℕ} : IsPell (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ↔ x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1 :=
⟨fun h =>
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).1
(by rw [Int.ofNat_sub (Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat <| Int.le.intro_sub _ h)]; exact h),
fun h =>
show ((x * x : ℕ) - (d a1 * y * y : ℕ) : ℤ) = 1 by
rw [← Int.ofNat_sub <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ h, h]; rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_succ (n : ℕ) : pellZd a1 (n + 1) = pellZd a1 n * ⟨a, 1⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem isPell_one : IsPell (⟨a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) :=
show az a * az a - d a1 * 1 * 1 = 1 by simp [dz_val]
theorem isPell_pellZd : ∀ n : ℕ, IsPell (pellZd a1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
let o := isPell_one a1
simpa using Pell.isPell_mul (isPell_pellZd n) o
@[simp]
theorem pell_eqz (n : ℕ) : xz a1 n * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 n = 1 :=
isPell_pellZd a1 n
@[simp]
theorem pell_eq (n : ℕ) : xn a1 n * xn a1 n - d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n = 1 :=
let pn := pell_eqz a1 n
have h : (↑(xn a1 n * xn a1 n) : ℤ) - ↑(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n) = 1 := by
repeat' rw [Int.natCast_mul]; exact pn
have hl : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n ≤ xn a1 n * xn a1 n :=
Nat.cast_le.1 <| Int.le.intro _ <| add_eq_of_eq_sub' <| Eq.symm h
(Nat.cast_inj (R := ℤ)).1 (by rw [Int.ofNat_sub hl]; exact h)
instance dnsq : Zsqrtd.Nonsquare (d a1) :=
⟨fun n h =>
have : n * n + 1 = a * a := by rw [← h]; exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (asq_pos a1)
have na : n < a := Nat.mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.1 (by rw [← this]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _)
have : (n + 1) * (n + 1) ≤ n * n + 1 := by rw [this]; exact Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self na
have : n + n ≤ 0 :=
@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ (n * n + 1) _ (by ring_nf at this ⊢; assumption)
Nat.ne_of_gt (d_pos a1) <| by
rwa [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero ((Nat.le_add_left _ _).trans this)] at h⟩
theorem xn_ge_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ≤ xn a1 n
| 0 => le_refl 1
| n + 1 => by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, xn_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (xn_ge_a_pow n)) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
theorem n_lt_xn (n) : n < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_pow_self a1) (xn_ge_a_pow a1 n)
theorem x_pos (n) : 0 < xn a1 n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le n) (n_lt_xn a1 n)
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
| 0, _ => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
| n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
(isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
(by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
⟨m + 1, by
rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
pellZd_succ, e]⟩
else
suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
fun h1l => by
obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := b
exact by
have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
rw [bm, mul_one] at t
exact h1l t
have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
rw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
exact ha t
simp only [sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add] at y0l; simp only [Zsqrtd.neg_re, add_neg_cancel,
Zsqrtd.neg_im, neg_neg] at yl2
exact
match y, y0l, (yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩) with
| 0, y0l, _ => y0l (le_refl 0)
| (y + 1 : ℕ), _, yl2 =>
yl2
(Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (by simp [sub_eq_add_neg])
(let t := Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le (Nat.succ_pos y)
add_le_add t t))
| Int.negSucc _, y0l, _ => y0l trivial
theorem eq_pellZd (b : ℤ√(d a1)) (b1 : 1 ≤ b) (hp : IsPell b) : ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := @Zsqrtd.le_arch (d a1) b
eq_pell_lem a1 n b b1 hp <|
h.trans <| by
rw [Zsqrtd.natCast_val]
exact
Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le <| le_of_lt <| n_lt_xn _ _)
(Int.ofNat_zero_le _)
/-- Every solution to **Pell's equation** is recursively obtained from the initial solution
`(1,0)` using the recursion `pell`. -/
theorem eq_pell {x y : ℕ} (hp : x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1) : ∃ n, x = xn a1 n ∧ y = yn a1 n :=
have : (1 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨x, y⟩ :=
match x, hp with
| 0, (hp : 0 - _ = 1) => by rw [zero_tsub] at hp; contradiction
| x + 1, _hp =>
Zsqrtd.le_of_le_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le <| Nat.succ_pos x) (Int.ofNat_zero_le _)
let ⟨m, e⟩ := eq_pellZd a1 ⟨x, y⟩ this ((isPell_nat a1).2 hp)
⟨m,
match x, y, e with
| _, _, rfl => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
theorem pellZd_add (m) : ∀ n, pellZd a1 (m + n) = pellZd a1 m * pellZd a1 n
| 0 => (mul_one _).symm
| n + 1 => by rw [← add_assoc, pellZd_succ, pellZd_succ, pellZd_add _ n, ← mul_assoc]
theorem xn_add (m n) : xn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 m * yn a1 n := by
injection pellZd_add a1 m n with h _
zify
rw [h]
simp [pellZd]
theorem yn_add (m n) : yn a1 (m + n) = xn a1 m * yn a1 n + yn a1 m * xn a1 n := by
injection pellZd_add a1 m n with _ h
zify
rw [h]
simp [pellZd]
theorem pellZd_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : pellZd a1 (m - n) = pellZd a1 m * star (pellZd a1 n) := by
let t := pellZd_add a1 n (m - n)
rw [add_tsub_cancel_of_le h] at t
rw [t, mul_comm (pellZd _ n) _, mul_assoc, isPell_norm.1 (isPell_pellZd _ _), mul_one]
theorem xz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) :
xz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 m * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 m * yz a1 n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_neg]
exact congr_arg Zsqrtd.re (pellZd_sub a1 h)
theorem yz_sub {m n} (h : n ≤ m) : yz a1 (m - n) = xz a1 n * yz a1 m - xz a1 m * yz a1 n := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← mul_neg, mul_comm, add_comm]
exact congr_arg Zsqrtd.im (pellZd_sub a1 h)
theorem xy_coprime (n) : (xn a1 n).Coprime (yn a1 n) :=
Nat.coprime_of_dvd' fun k _ kx ky => by
let p := pell_eq a1 n
rw [← p]
exact Nat.dvd_sub (kx.mul_left _) (ky.mul_left _)
theorem strictMono_y : StrictMono (yn a1)
| _, 0, h => absurd h <| Nat.not_lt_zero _
| m, n + 1, h => by
have : yn a1 m ≤ yn a1 n :=
Or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) (fun hl => le_of_lt <| strictMono_y hl)
fun e => by rw [e]
simp only [yn_succ, gt_iff_lt]; refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left <| x_pos a1 n)
rw [← mul_one (yn a1 m)]
exact mul_le_mul this (le_of_lt a1) (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem strictMono_x : StrictMono (xn a1)
| _, 0, h => absurd h <| Nat.not_lt_zero _
| m, n + 1, h => by
have : xn a1 m ≤ xn a1 n :=
Or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h) (fun hl => le_of_lt <| strictMono_x hl)
fun e => by rw [e]
simp only [xn_succ, gt_iff_lt]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_of_le_of_lt this ?_) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
have t := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left a1 (x_pos a1 n)
rwa [mul_one] at t
theorem yn_ge_n : ∀ n, n ≤ yn a1 n
| 0 => Nat.zero_le _
| n + 1 =>
show n < yn a1 (n + 1) from lt_of_le_of_lt (yn_ge_n n) (strictMono_y a1 <| Nat.lt_succ_self n)
theorem y_mul_dvd (n) : ∀ k, yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * k)
| 0 => dvd_zero _
| k + 1 => by
rw [Nat.mul_succ, yn_add]; exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) ((y_mul_dvd _ k).mul_right _)
theorem y_dvd_iff (m n) : yn a1 m ∣ yn a1 n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun h =>
Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero <|
(Nat.eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_right fun hp => by
have co : Nat.Coprime (yn a1 m) (xn a1 (m * (n / m))) :=
Nat.Coprime.symm <| (xy_coprime a1 _).coprime_dvd_right (y_mul_dvd a1 m (n / m))
have m0 : 0 < m :=
m.eq_zero_or_pos.resolve_left fun e => by
rw [e, Nat.mod_zero] at hp;rw [e] at h
exact _root_.ne_of_lt (strictMono_y a1 hp) (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h).symm
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n m, yn_add] at h
exact
not_le_of_gt (strictMono_y _ <| Nat.mod_lt n m0)
(Nat.le_of_dvd (strictMono_y _ hp) <|
co.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <|
(Nat.dvd_add_iff_right <| (y_mul_dvd _ _ _).mul_left _).2 h),
fun ⟨k, e⟩ => by rw [e]; apply y_mul_dvd⟩
theorem xy_modEq_yn (n) :
∀ k, xn a1 (n * k) ≡ xn a1 n ^ k [MOD yn a1 n ^ 2] ∧ yn a1 (n * k) ≡
k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n [MOD yn a1 n ^ 3]
| 0 => by constructor <;> simpa using Nat.ModEq.refl _
| k + 1 => by
let ⟨hx, hy⟩ := xy_modEq_yn n k
have L : xn a1 (n * k) * xn a1 n + d a1 * yn a1 (n * k) * yn a1 n ≡
xn a1 n ^ k * xn a1 n + 0 [MOD yn a1 n ^ 2] :=
(hx.mul_right _).add <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by
rw [_root_.pow_succ]
exact
mul_dvd_mul_right
(dvd_mul_of_dvd_right
(modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <|
(hy.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).trans <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp)
_) _
have R : xn a1 (n * k) * yn a1 n + yn a1 (n * k) * xn a1 n ≡
xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n + k * xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n [MOD yn a1 n ^ 3] :=
ModEq.add
(by
rw [_root_.pow_succ]
exact hx.mul_right' _) <| by
have : k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) * yn a1 n * xn a1 n = k * xn a1 n ^ k * yn a1 n := by
rcases k with - | k <;> simp [_root_.pow_succ]; ring_nf
rw [← this]
exact hy.mul_right _
rw [add_tsub_cancel_right, Nat.mul_succ, xn_add, yn_add, pow_succ (xn _ n), Nat.succ_mul,
add_comm (k * xn _ n ^ k) (xn _ n ^ k), right_distrib]
exact ⟨L, R⟩
theorem ysq_dvd_yy (n) : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 (n * yn a1 n) :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <|
((xy_modEq_yn a1 n (yn a1 n)).right.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).trans
(modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 <| by simp [mul_dvd_mul_left, mul_assoc])
theorem dvd_of_ysq_dvd {n t} (h : yn a1 n * yn a1 n ∣ yn a1 t) : yn a1 n ∣ t :=
have nt : n ∣ t := (y_dvd_iff a1 n t).1 <| dvd_of_mul_left_dvd h
n.eq_zero_or_pos.elim (fun n0 => by rwa [n0] at nt ⊢) fun n0l : 0 < n => by
let ⟨k, ke⟩ := nt
have : yn a1 n ∣ k * xn a1 n ^ (k - 1) :=
Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (strictMono_y a1 n0l) <|
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 <| by
have xm := (xy_modEq_yn a1 n k).right; rw [← ke] at xm
exact (xm.of_dvd <| by simp [_root_.pow_succ]).symm.trans h.modEq_zero_nat
rw [ke]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right (((xy_coprime _ _).pow_left _).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right this) _
theorem pellZd_succ_succ (n) :
pellZd a1 (n + 2) + pellZd a1 n = (2 * a : ℕ) * pellZd a1 (n + 1) := by
have : (1 : ℤ√(d a1)) + ⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ = ⟨a, 1⟩ * (2 * a) := by
rw [Zsqrtd.natCast_val]
change (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = ⟨_, _⟩
rw [dz_val]
dsimp [az]
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring_nf
simpa [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_comm] using congr_arg (· * pellZd a1 n) this
theorem xy_succ_succ (n) :
xn a1 (n + 2) + xn a1 n =
2 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) ∧ yn a1 (n + 2) + yn a1 n = 2 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) := by
have := pellZd_succ_succ a1 n; unfold pellZd at this
rw [Zsqrtd.nsmul_val (2 * a : ℕ)] at this
injection this with h₁ h₂
constructor <;> apply Int.ofNat.inj <;> [simpa using h₁; simpa using h₂]
theorem xn_succ_succ (n) : xn a1 (n + 2) + xn a1 n = 2 * a * xn a1 (n + 1) :=
(xy_succ_succ a1 n).1
theorem yn_succ_succ (n) : yn a1 (n + 2) + yn a1 n = 2 * a * yn a1 (n + 1) :=
(xy_succ_succ a1 n).2
theorem xz_succ_succ (n) : xz a1 (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * xz a1 (n + 1) - xz a1 n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by delta xz; rw [← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_mul, xn_succ_succ]
theorem yz_succ_succ (n) : yz a1 (n + 2) = (2 * a : ℕ) * yz a1 (n + 1) - yz a1 n :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by delta yz; rw [← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_mul, yn_succ_succ]
theorem yn_modEq_a_sub_one : ∀ n, yn a1 n ≡ n [MOD a - 1]
| 0 => by simp [Nat.ModEq.refl]
| 1 => by simp [Nat.ModEq.refl]
| n + 2 =>
(yn_modEq_a_sub_one n).add_right_cancel <| by
rw [yn_succ_succ, (by ring : n + 2 + n = 2 * (n + 1))]
exact ((modEq_sub a1.le).mul_left 2).mul (yn_modEq_a_sub_one (n + 1))
theorem yn_modEq_two : ∀ n, yn a1 n ≡ n [MOD 2]
| 0 => by rfl
| 1 => by simp; rfl
| n + 2 =>
(yn_modEq_two n).add_right_cancel <| by
rw [yn_succ_succ, mul_assoc, (by ring : n + 2 + n = 2 * (n + 1))]
exact (dvd_mul_right 2 _).modEq_zero_nat.trans (dvd_mul_right 2 _).zero_modEq_nat
section
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem (y2 y1 y0 yn1 yn0 xn1 xn0 ay a2 : ℤ) :
(a2 * yn1 - yn0) * ay + y2 - (a2 * xn1 - xn0) =
y2 - a2 * y1 + y0 + a2 * (yn1 * ay + y1 - xn1) - (yn0 * ay + y0 - xn0) := by
ring
end
theorem x_sub_y_dvd_pow (y : ℕ) :
∀ n, (2 * a * y - y * y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ yz a1 n * (a - y) + ↑(y ^ n) - xz a1 n
| 0 => by simp [xz, yz, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_one]
| 1 => by simp [xz, yz, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_one]
| n + 2 => by
have : (2 * a * y - y * y - 1 : ℤ) ∣ ↑(y ^ (n + 2)) - ↑(2 * a) * ↑(y ^ (n + 1)) + ↑(y ^ n) :=
⟨-↑(y ^ n), by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, mul_add, Int.natCast_mul, show ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ) = 2 from rfl, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm]
ring⟩
rw [xz_succ_succ, yz_succ_succ, x_sub_y_dvd_pow_lem ↑(y ^ (n + 2)) ↑(y ^ (n + 1)) ↑(y ^ n)]
exact _root_.dvd_sub (dvd_add this <| (x_sub_y_dvd_pow _ (n + 1)).mul_left _)
(x_sub_y_dvd_pow _ n)
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem (n j) : xn a1 n ∣ d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j := by
have h1 : d a1 * yn a1 n * (yn a1 n * xn a1 j) + xn a1 j =
(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n + 1) * xn a1 j := by
simp [add_mul, mul_assoc]
have h2 : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n + 1 = xn a1 n * xn a1 n := by
zify at *
apply add_eq_of_eq_sub' (Eq.symm (pell_eqz a1 n))
rw [h2] at h1; rw [h1, mul_assoc]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_add (n j) : xn a1 (2 * n + j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] := by
rw [two_mul, add_assoc, xn_add, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
refine (dvd_mul_right (xn a1 n) (xn a1 (n + j))).modEq_zero_nat.add ?_
rw [yn_add, left_distrib, add_assoc, ← zero_add 0]
| exact
((dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_left _).modEq_zero_nat.add (xn_modEq_x2n_add_lem _ _ _).modEq_zero_nat
theorem xn_modEq_x2n_sub_lem {n j} (h : j ≤ n) : xn a1 (2 * n - j) + xn a1 j ≡ 0 [MOD xn a1 n] := by
have h1 : xz a1 n ∣ d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 (n - j) + xz a1 j := by
rw [yz_sub _ h, mul_sub_left_distrib, sub_add_eq_add_sub]
exact
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PellMatiyasevic.lean | 518 | 524 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Algebra.Exponential
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Exponential
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.CauSeqFilter
/-!
# Calculus results on exponential in a Banach algebra
In this file, we prove basic properties about the derivative of the exponential map `exp 𝕂`
in a Banach algebra `𝔸` over a field `𝕂`. We keep them separate from the main file
`Analysis.Normed.Algebra.Exponential` in order to minimize dependencies.
## Main results
We prove most results for an arbitrary field `𝕂`, and then specialize to `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`.
### General case
- `hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos` : `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂` has strict Fréchet derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero
(see also `hasStrictDerivAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos` for the case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
- `hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_of_lt_radius` : if `𝕂` has characteristic zero and `𝔸` is commutative,
then given a point `x` in the disk of convergence, `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂` has strict Fréchet
derivative `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at x
(see also `hasStrictDerivAt_exp_of_lt_radius` for the case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
- `hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_smul_const_of_mem_ball`: even when `𝔸` is non-commutative,
if we have an intermediate algebra `𝕊` which is commutative, the function
`(u : 𝕊) ↦ NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 (u • x)`, still has strict Fréchet derivative
`NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 (t • x) • (1 : 𝕊 →L[𝕂] 𝕊).smulRight x` at `t` if
`t • x` is in the radius of convergence.
### `𝕂 = ℝ` or `𝕂 = ℂ`
- `hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_zero` : `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂` has strict Fréchet derivative `1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸`
at zero (see also `hasStrictDerivAt_exp_zero` for the case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
- `hasStrictFDerivAt_exp` : if `𝔸` is commutative, then given any point `x`, `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂`
has strict Fréchet derivative `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at x
(see also `hasStrictDerivAt_exp` for the case `𝔸 = 𝕂`)
- `hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_smul_const`: even when `𝔸` is non-commutative, if we have
an intermediate algebra `𝕊` which is commutative, the function
`(u : 𝕊) ↦ NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 (u • x)` still has strict Fréchet derivative
`NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 (t • x) • (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸).smulRight x` at `t`.
### Compatibility with `Real.exp` and `Complex.exp`
- `Complex.exp_eq_exp_ℂ` : `Complex.exp = NormedSpace.exp ℂ ℂ`
- `Real.exp_eq_exp_ℝ` : `Real.exp = NormedSpace.exp ℝ ℝ`
-/
open Filter RCLike ContinuousMultilinearMap NormedField NormedSpace Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ENNReal
section AnyFieldAnyAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕂] [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[CompleteSpace 𝔸]
/-- The exponential in a Banach algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` has strict Fréchet derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) 0 := by
convert (hasFPowerSeriesAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos h).hasStrictFDerivAt
ext x
change x = expSeries 𝕂 𝔸 1 fun _ => x
simp [expSeries_apply_eq, Nat.factorial]
/-- The exponential in a Banach algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` has Fréchet derivative
`1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸` at zero, as long as it converges on a neighborhood of zero. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos (h : 0 < (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasFDerivAt (exp 𝕂) (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸) 0 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos h).hasFDerivAt
end AnyFieldAnyAlgebra
section AnyFieldCommAlgebra
variable {𝕂 𝔸 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕂] [NormedCommRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕂 𝔸]
[CompleteSpace 𝔸]
/-- The exponential map in a commutative Banach algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` of
characteristic zero has Fréchet derivative `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸`
at any point `x`in the disk of convergence. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_exp_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasFDerivAt (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x • (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸)) x := by
have hpos : 0 < (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius := (zero_le _).trans_lt hx
rw [hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero]
suffices
(fun h => exp 𝕂 x * (exp 𝕂 (0 + h) - exp 𝕂 0 - ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕂 𝔸 h)) =ᶠ[𝓝 0] fun h =>
exp 𝕂 (x + h) - exp 𝕂 x - exp 𝕂 x • ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕂 𝔸 h by
refine (IsLittleO.const_mul_left ?_ _).congr' this (EventuallyEq.refl _ _)
rw [← hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero]
exact hasFDerivAt_exp_zero_of_radius_pos hpos
have : ∀ᶠ h in 𝓝 (0 : 𝔸), h ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius :=
EMetric.ball_mem_nhds _ hpos
filter_upwards [this] with _ hh
rw [exp_add_of_mem_ball hx hh, exp_zero, zero_add, ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply, smul_eq_mul]
ring
/-- The exponential map in a commutative Banach algebra `𝔸` over a normed field `𝕂` of
characteristic zero has strict Fréchet derivative `NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 x • 1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸`
at any point `x` in the disk of convergence. -/
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x : 𝔸}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝔸) (expSeries 𝕂 𝔸).radius) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x • (1 : 𝔸 →L[𝕂] 𝔸)) x :=
let ⟨_, hp⟩ := analyticAt_exp_of_mem_ball x hx
hp.hasFDerivAt.unique (hasFDerivAt_exp_of_mem_ball hx) ▸ hp.hasStrictFDerivAt
end AnyFieldCommAlgebra
section deriv
variable {𝕂 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕂] [CompleteSpace 𝕂]
/-- The exponential map in a complete normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero has strict derivative
`NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 x` at any point `x` in the disk of convergence. -/
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_exp_of_mem_ball [CharZero 𝕂] {x : 𝕂}
(hx : x ∈ EMetric.ball (0 : 𝕂) (expSeries 𝕂 𝕂).radius) :
HasStrictDerivAt (exp 𝕂) (exp 𝕂 x) x := by
| simpa using (hasStrictFDerivAt_exp_of_mem_ball hx).hasStrictDerivAt
/-- The exponential map in a complete normed field `𝕂` of characteristic zero has derivative
`NormedSpace.exp 𝕂 x` at any point `x` in the disk of convergence. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Exponential.lean | 128 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arsinh
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Inversion.Basic
/-!
# Metric on the upper half-plane
In this file we define a `MetricSpace` structure on the `UpperHalfPlane`. We use hyperbolic
(Poincaré) distance given by
`dist z w = 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)))` instead of the induced
Euclidean distance because the hyperbolic distance is invariant under holomorphic automorphisms of
the upper half-plane. However, we ensure that the projection to `TopologicalSpace` is
definitionally equal to the induced topological space structure.
We also prove that a metric ball/closed ball/sphere in Poincaré metric is a Euclidean ball/closed
ball/sphere with another center and radius.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Metric Real Set Topology
open scoped UpperHalfPlane ComplexConjugate NNReal Topology MatrixGroups
variable {z w : ℍ} {r : ℝ}
namespace UpperHalfPlane
instance : Dist ℍ :=
⟨fun z w => 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)))⟩
theorem dist_eq (z w : ℍ) : dist z w = 2 * arsinh (dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im))) :=
rfl
theorem sinh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
sinh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [dist_eq, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (arsinh _) two_ne_zero, sinh_arsinh]
theorem cosh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
cosh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) (conj (w : ℂ)) / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, cosh_sq', sinh_half_dist, div_pow, div_pow, one_add_div, mul_pow, sq_sqrt]
· congr 1
simp only [Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, Complex.normSq_sub, Complex.normSq_conj,
Complex.conj_conj, Complex.mul_re, Complex.conj_re, Complex.conj_im, coe_im]
ring
all_goals positivity
theorem tanh_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
tanh (dist z w / 2) = dist (z : ℂ) w / dist (z : ℂ) (conj ↑w) := by
rw [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, div_div_div_comm, div_self, div_one]
positivity
theorem exp_half_dist (z w : ℍ) :
exp (dist z w / 2) = (dist (z : ℂ) w + dist (z : ℂ) (conj ↑w)) / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) := by
rw [← sinh_add_cosh, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, add_div]
theorem cosh_dist (z w : ℍ) : cosh (dist z w) = 1 + dist (z : ℂ) w ^ 2 / (2 * z.im * w.im) := by
rw [dist_eq, cosh_two_mul, cosh_sq', add_assoc, ← two_mul, sinh_arsinh, div_pow, mul_pow,
sq_sqrt, sq (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left] <;> positivity
theorem sinh_half_dist_add_dist (a b c : ℍ) : sinh ((dist a b + dist b c) / 2) =
(dist (a : ℂ) b * dist (c : ℂ) (conj ↑b) + dist (b : ℂ) c * dist (a : ℂ) (conj ↑b)) /
(2 * √(a.im * c.im) * dist (b : ℂ) (conj ↑b)) := by
simp only [add_div _ _ (2 : ℝ), sinh_add, sinh_half_dist, cosh_half_dist, div_mul_div_comm]
rw [← add_div, Complex.dist_self_conj, coe_im, abs_of_pos b.im_pos, mul_comm (dist (b : ℂ) _),
dist_comm (b : ℂ), Complex.dist_conj_comm, mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_mul_mul_comm _ _ _ b.im]
congr 2
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_mul, sqrt_mul, mul_comm (√a.im), mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_self_sqrt,
mul_comm] <;> exact (im_pos _).le
protected theorem dist_comm (z w : ℍ) : dist z w = dist w z := by
simp only [dist_eq, dist_comm (z : ℂ), mul_comm]
theorem dist_le_iff_le_sinh :
dist z w ≤ r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) ≤ sinh (r / 2) := by
rw [← div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (zero_lt_two' ℝ), ← sinh_le_sinh, sinh_half_dist]
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_sinh :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w / (2 * √(z.im * w.im)) = sinh (r / 2) := by
rw [← div_left_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sinh_inj, sinh_half_dist]
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_sq_sinh (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) w ^ 2 / (4 * z.im * w.im) = sinh (r / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [dist_eq_iff_eq_sinh, ← sq_eq_sq₀, div_pow, mul_pow, sq_sqrt, mul_assoc]
· norm_num
all_goals positivity
protected theorem dist_triangle (a b c : ℍ) : dist a c ≤ dist a b + dist b c := by
rw [dist_le_iff_le_sinh, sinh_half_dist_add_dist, div_mul_eq_div_div _ _ (dist _ _), le_div_iff₀,
div_mul_eq_mul_div]
· gcongr
exact EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist (a : ℂ) b c (conj (b : ℂ))
· rw [dist_comm, dist_pos, Ne, Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact b.im_ne_zero
theorem dist_le_dist_coe_div_sqrt (z w : ℍ) : dist z w ≤ dist (z : ℂ) w / √(z.im * w.im) := by
rw [dist_le_iff_le_sinh, ← div_mul_eq_div_div_swap, self_le_sinh_iff]
positivity
/-- An auxiliary `MetricSpace` instance on the upper half-plane. This instance has bad projection
to `TopologicalSpace`. We replace it later. -/
def metricSpaceAux : MetricSpace ℍ where
dist := dist
dist_self z := by rw [dist_eq, dist_self, zero_div, arsinh_zero, mul_zero]
dist_comm := UpperHalfPlane.dist_comm
dist_triangle := UpperHalfPlane.dist_triangle
eq_of_dist_eq_zero {z w} h := by
simpa [dist_eq, Real.sqrt_eq_zero', (mul_pos z.im_pos w.im_pos).not_le, Set.ext_iff] using h
open Complex
theorem cosh_dist' (z w : ℍ) :
Real.cosh (dist z w) = ((z.re - w.re) ^ 2 + z.im ^ 2 + w.im ^ 2) / (2 * z.im * w.im) := by
field_simp [cosh_dist, Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, normSq_apply]
ring
/-- Euclidean center of the circle with center `z` and radius `r` in the hyperbolic metric. -/
def center (z : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : ℍ :=
⟨⟨z.re, z.im * Real.cosh r⟩, by positivity⟩
@[simp]
theorem center_re (z r) : (center z r).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_im (z r) : (center z r).im = z.im * Real.cosh r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem center_zero (z : ℍ) : center z 0 = z :=
ext' rfl <| by rw [center_im, Real.cosh_zero, mul_one]
theorem dist_coe_center_sq (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) ^ 2 =
2 * z.im * w.im * (Real.cosh (dist z w) - Real.cosh r) + (w.im * Real.sinh r) ^ 2 := by
have H : 2 * z.im * w.im ≠ 0 := by positivity
simp only [Complex.dist_eq, Complex.sq_norm, normSq_apply, coe_re, coe_im, center_re, center_im,
cosh_dist', mul_div_cancel₀ _ H, sub_sq z.im, mul_pow, Real.cosh_sq, sub_re, sub_im, mul_sub, ←
sq]
ring
theorem dist_coe_center (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) : dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) =
√(2 * z.im * w.im * (Real.cosh (dist z w) - Real.cosh r) + (w.im * Real.sinh r) ^ 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq dist_nonneg, dist_coe_center_sq]
theorem cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center (z w : ℍ) (r : ℝ) :
cmp (dist z w) r = cmp (dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r)) (w.im * Real.sinh r) := by
letI := metricSpaceAux
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with hr₀ | hr₀
· trans Ordering.gt
exacts [(hr₀.trans_le dist_nonneg).cmp_eq_gt,
((mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg w.im_pos (sinh_neg_iff.2 hr₀)).trans_le dist_nonneg).cmp_eq_gt.symm]
have hr₀' : 0 ≤ w.im * Real.sinh r := by positivity
have hzw₀ : 0 < 2 * z.im * w.im := by positivity
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
we need to give Lean the hint `(y := w.im * Real.sinh r)`. -/
simp only [← cosh_strictMonoOn.cmp_map_eq dist_nonneg hr₀,
← (pow_left_strictMonoOn₀ two_ne_zero).cmp_map_eq dist_nonneg (y := w.im * Real.sinh r) hr₀',
dist_coe_center_sq]
rw [← cmp_mul_pos_left hzw₀, ← cmp_sub_zero, ← mul_sub, ← cmp_add_right, zero_add]
theorem dist_eq_iff_dist_coe_center_eq :
dist z w = r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) = w.im * Real.sinh r :=
eq_iff_eq_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
@[simp]
theorem dist_self_center (z : ℍ) (r : ℝ) :
dist (z : ℂ) (z.center r) = z.im * (Real.cosh r - 1) := by
rw [dist_of_re_eq (z.center_re r).symm, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, mul_sub, mul_one]
exact abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 <| le_mul_of_one_le_right z.im_pos.le (one_le_cosh _))
|
@[simp]
theorem dist_center_dist (z w : ℍ) :
dist (z : ℂ) (w.center (dist z w)) = w.im * Real.sinh (dist z w) :=
dist_eq_iff_dist_coe_center_eq.1 rfl
theorem dist_lt_iff_dist_coe_center_lt :
dist z w < r ↔ dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) < w.im * Real.sinh r :=
lt_iff_lt_of_cmp_eq_cmp (cmp_dist_eq_cmp_dist_coe_center z w r)
theorem lt_dist_iff_lt_dist_coe_center :
r < dist z w ↔ w.im * Real.sinh r < dist (z : ℂ) (w.center r) :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/UpperHalfPlane/Metric.lean | 176 | 187 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Grayson Burton, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.WithTopBot
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.WithBotTop
/-!
# The covering relation
This file proves properties of the covering relation in an order.
We say that `b` *covers* `a` if `a < b` and there is no element in between.
We say that `b` *weakly covers* `a` if `a ≤ b` and there is no element between `a` and `b`.
In a partial order this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ a = b`,
in a preorder this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a)`
## Notation
* `a ⋖ b` means that `b` covers `a`.
* `a ⩿ b` means that `b` weakly covers `a`.
-/
open Set OrderDual
variable {α β : Type*}
section WeaklyCovers
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.le (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1
theorem WCovBy.refl (a : α) : a ⩿ a :=
⟨le_rfl, fun _ hc => hc.not_lt⟩
@[simp] lemma WCovBy.rfl : a ⩿ a := WCovBy.refl a
protected theorem Eq.wcovBy (h : a = b) : a ⩿ b :=
h ▸ WCovBy.rfl
theorem wcovBy_of_le_of_le (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h1, fun _ hac hcb => (hac.trans hcb).not_le h2⟩
alias LE.le.wcovBy_of_le := wcovBy_of_le_of_le
theorem AntisymmRel.wcovBy (h : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ b :=
wcovBy_of_le_of_le h.1 h.2
theorem WCovBy.wcovBy_iff_le (hab : a ⩿ b) : b ⩿ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h.le, fun h => h.wcovBy_of_le hab.le⟩
theorem wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_wcovBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⩿ c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans hbc.le, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ c ↔ b ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_wcovBy, hab.trans_wcovBy⟩
theorem WCovBy.trans_antisymm_rel (hab : a ⩿ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.le.trans hbc.1, fun _ had hdc => hab.2 had <| hdc.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⩿ a ↔ c ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab.symm⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_wcovBy_iff (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a ⩿ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [WCovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
instance WCovBy.isRefl : IsRefl α (· ⩿ ·) :=
⟨WCovBy.refl⟩
theorem WCovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h.2 hx.1 hx.2
theorem wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⩿ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le' (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem WCovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⩿ f b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨f.le_iff_le.mp h.le, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem WCovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⩿ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⩿ f b := by
refine ⟨f.monotone hab.le, fun c ha hb => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := h.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨ha.le, hb.le⟩
rw [f.lt_iff_lt] at ha hb
exact hab.2 ha hb
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⩿ f b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h2 => h2.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_wcovBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
| e a ⩿ e b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
| Mathlib/Order/Cover.lean | 108 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Restrict
/-!
# Functions over sets
This file contains basic results on the following predicates of functions and sets:
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : α}
/-- This lemma exists for use by `aesop` as a forward rule. -/
@[aesop safe forward]
lemma EqOn.eq_of_mem (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) (ha : a ∈ s) : f₁ a = f₂ a :=
h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
| theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 74 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Pierre-Alexandre Bazin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pierre-Alexandre Bazin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.DedekindDomain
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Projective
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Biproducts
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule.Basic
/-!
# Structure of finitely generated modules over a PID
## Main statements
* `Module.equiv_directSum_of_isTorsion` : A finitely generated torsion module over a PID is
isomorphic to a direct sum of some `R ⧸ R ∙ (p i ^ e i)` where the `p i ^ e i` are prime powers.
* `Module.equiv_free_prod_directSum` : A finitely generated module over a PID is isomorphic to the
product of a free module (its torsion free part) and a direct sum of the form above (its torsion
submodule).
## Notation
* `R` is a PID and `M` is a (finitely generated for main statements) `R`-module, with additional
torsion hypotheses in the intermediate lemmas.
* `p` is an irreducible element of `R` or a tuple of these.
## Implementation details
We first prove (`Submodule.isInternal_prime_power_torsion_of_pid`) that a finitely generated
torsion module is the internal direct sum of its `p i ^ e i`-torsion submodules for some
(finitely many) prime powers `p i ^ e i`. This is proved in more generality for a Dedekind domain
at `Submodule.isInternal_prime_power_torsion`.
Then we treat the case of a `p ^ ∞`-torsion module (that is, a module where all elements are
cancelled by scalar multiplication by some power of `p`) and apply it to the `p i ^ e i`-torsion
submodules (that are `p i ^ ∞`-torsion) to get the result for torsion modules.
Then we get the general result using that a torsion free module is free (which has been proved at
`Module.free_of_finite_type_torsion_free'` at `LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID`.)
## Tags
Finitely generated module, principal ideal domain, classification, structure theorem
-/
-- We shouldn't need to know about topology to prove
-- the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a PID.
assert_not_exists TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
variable {M : Type v} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
open scoped DirectSum
open Submodule
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
theorem Submodule.isSemisimple_torsionBy_of_irreducible {a : R} (h : Irreducible a) :
IsSemisimpleModule R (torsionBy R M a) :=
haveI := PrincipalIdealRing.isMaximal_of_irreducible h
letI := Ideal.Quotient.field (R ∙ a)
(submodule_torsionBy_orderIso a).complementedLattice
variable [IsDomain R]
/-- A finitely generated torsion module over a PID is an internal direct sum of its
`p i ^ e i`-torsion submodules for some primes `p i` and numbers `e i`. -/
theorem Submodule.isInternal_prime_power_torsion_of_pid [DecidableEq (Ideal R)] [Module.Finite R M]
(hM : Module.IsTorsion R M) :
DirectSum.IsInternal fun p : (factors (⊤ : Submodule R M).annihilator).toFinset =>
torsionBy R M
(IsPrincipal.generator (p : Ideal R) ^
(factors (⊤ : Submodule R M).annihilator).count ↑p) := by
convert isInternal_prime_power_torsion hM
ext p : 1
rw [← torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ← Ideal.span_singleton_pow,
Ideal.span_singleton_generator]
/-- A finitely generated torsion module over a PID is an internal direct sum of its
`p i ^ e i`-torsion submodules for some primes `p i` and numbers `e i`. -/
theorem Submodule.exists_isInternal_prime_power_torsion_of_pid [Module.Finite R M]
(hM : Module.IsTorsion R M) :
∃ (ι : Type u) (_ : Fintype ι) (_ : DecidableEq ι) (p : ι → R) (_ : ∀ i, Irreducible <| p i)
(e : ι → ℕ), DirectSum.IsInternal fun i => torsionBy R M <| p i ^ e i := by
classical
refine ⟨_, ?_, _, _, ?_, _, Submodule.isInternal_prime_power_torsion_of_pid hM⟩
· exact Finset.fintypeCoeSort _
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
have hP := prime_of_factor p (Multiset.mem_toFinset.mp hp)
haveI := Ideal.isPrime_of_prime hP
exact (IsPrincipal.prime_generator_of_isPrime p hP.ne_zero).irreducible
namespace Module
section PTorsion
variable {p : R} (hp : Irreducible p) (hM : Module.IsTorsion' M (Submonoid.powers p))
variable [dec : ∀ x : M, Decidable (x = 0)]
open Ideal Submodule.IsPrincipal
include hp
theorem _root_.Ideal.torsionOf_eq_span_pow_pOrder (x : M) :
torsionOf R M x = span {p ^ pOrder hM x} := by
classical
dsimp only [pOrder]
rw [← (torsionOf R M x).span_singleton_generator, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, ←
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated, Associates.mk_pow]
have prop :
(fun n : ℕ => p ^ n • x = 0) = fun n : ℕ =>
(Associates.mk <| generator <| torsionOf R M x) ∣ Associates.mk p ^ n := by
ext n; rw [← Associates.mk_pow, Associates.mk_dvd_mk, ← mem_iff_generator_dvd]; rfl
have := (isTorsion'_powers_iff p).mp hM x; rw [prop] at this
convert Associates.eq_pow_find_of_dvd_irreducible_pow (Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr hp)
this.choose_spec
theorem p_pow_smul_lift {x y : M} {k : ℕ} (hM' : Module.IsTorsionBy R M (p ^ pOrder hM y))
| (h : p ^ k • x ∈ R ∙ y) : ∃ a : R, p ^ k • x = p ^ k • a • y := by
by_cases hk : k ≤ pOrder hM y
· let f :=
((R ∙ p ^ (pOrder hM y - k) * p ^ k).quotEquivOfEq _ ?_).trans
(quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton R M y)
· have : f.symm ⟨p ^ k • x, h⟩ ∈
R ∙ Ideal.Quotient.mk (R ∙ p ^ (pOrder hM y - k) * p ^ k) (p ^ k) := by
rw [← Quotient.torsionBy_eq_span_singleton, mem_torsionBy_iff, ← f.symm.map_smul]
· convert f.symm.map_zero; ext
rw [coe_smul_of_tower, coe_mk, coe_zero, smul_smul, ← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel hk,
@hM' x]
· exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero)
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton] at this; obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := this; use a
rw [f.eq_symm_apply, ← Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk, ← Quotient.mk_smul] at ha
dsimp only [smul_eq_mul, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Submodule.quotEquivOfEq_mk,
quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton_apply_mk] at ha
rw [smul_smul, mul_comm]; exact congr_arg ((↑) : _ → M) ha.symm
· symm; convert Ideal.torsionOf_eq_span_pow_pOrder hp hM y
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel hk]
· use 0
rw [zero_smul, smul_zero, ← Nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_not_le hk), pow_add, mul_smul, hM',
smul_zero]
open Submodule.Quotient
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/PID.lean | 124 | 148 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimir Goryachev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Goryachev, Kyle Miller, Kim Morrison, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Count
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
/-!
# The `n`th Number Satisfying a Predicate
This file defines a function for "what is the `n`th number that satisfies a given predicate `p`",
and provides lemmas that deal with this function and its connection to `Nat.count`.
## Main definitions
* `Nat.nth p n`: The `n`-th natural `k` (zero-indexed) such that `p k`. If there is no
such natural (that is, `p` is true for at most `n` naturals), then `Nat.nth p n = 0`.
## Main results
* `Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin`: For a finitely-often true `p`, gives the cardinality of the set of
numbers satisfying `p` above particular values of `nth p`
* `Nat.gc_count_nth`: Establishes a Galois connection between `Nat.nth p` and `Nat.count p`.
* `Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat`: For an infinitely-often true predicate, `nth` agrees with the
order-isomorphism of the subtype to the natural numbers.
There has been some discussion on the subject of whether both of `nth` and
`Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat` should exist. See discussion
[here](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/9457#pullrequestreview-767221180).
Future work should address how lemmas that use these should be written.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
/-- Find the `n`-th natural number satisfying `p` (indexed from `0`, so `nth p 0` is the first
natural number satisfying `p`), or `0` if there is no such number. See also
`Subtype.orderIsoOfNat` for the order isomorphism with ℕ when `p` is infinitely often true. -/
noncomputable def nth (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := by
classical exact
if h : Set.Finite (setOf p) then (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0
else @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) (Set.Infinite.to_subtype h) n
variable {p}
/-!
### Lemmas about `Nat.nth` on a finite set
-/
theorem nth_of_card_le (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : #hf.toFinset ≤ n) :
nth p n = 0 := by rw [nth, dif_pos hf, List.getD_eq_default]; rwa [Finset.length_sort]
theorem nth_eq_getD_sort (h : (setOf p).Finite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0 :=
dif_pos h
theorem nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < #hf.toFinset) :
nth p n = hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
rw [nth_eq_getD_sort hf, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_apply, List.getD_eq_getElem, Fin.getElem_fin]
theorem nth_strictMonoOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) :
StrictMonoOn (nth p) (Set.Iio #hf.toFinset) := by
rintro m (hm : m < _) n (hn : n < _) h
simp only [nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin, *]
exact OrderEmbedding.strictMono _ h
theorem nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n)
(hn : n < #hf.toFinset) : nth p m < nth p n :=
nth_strictMonoOn hf (h.trans hn) hn h
theorem nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n)
(hn : n < #hf.toFinset) : nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).monotoneOn (h.trans_lt hn) hn h
theorem lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m < nth p n)
(hm : m < #hf.toFinset) : m < n :=
not_le.1 fun hle => h.not_le <| nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle hm
theorem le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m ≤ nth p n)
(hm : m < #hf.toFinset) : m ≤ n :=
not_lt.1 fun hlt => h.not_lt <| nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt hm
theorem nth_injOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : (Set.Iio #hf.toFinset).InjOn (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).injOn
theorem range_nth_of_finite (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : Set.range (nth p) = insert 0 (setOf p) := by
simpa only [← List.getD_eq_getElem?_getD, ← nth_eq_getD_sort hf, mem_sort,
Set.Finite.mem_toFinset] using Set.range_list_getD (hf.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)) 0
@[simp]
theorem image_nth_Iio_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : nth p '' Set.Iio #hf.toFinset = setOf p :=
calc
nth p '' Set.Iio #hf.toFinset = Set.range (hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl) := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Fin.exists_iff, ← nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin hf,
Set.mem_Iio, exists_prop]
_ = setOf p := by rw [range_orderEmbOfFin, Set.Finite.coe_toFinset]
theorem nth_mem_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hlt : n < #hf.toFinset) :
p (nth p n) :=
(image_nth_Iio_card hf).subset <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hlt
theorem exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, n < #hf.toFinset ∧ nth p n = x := by
rwa [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← image_nth_Iio_card hf] at h
/-!
### Lemmas about `Nat.nth` on an infinite set
-/
/-- When `s` is an infinite set, `nth` agrees with `Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat`. -/
theorem nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype n := by rw [nth, dif_neg hf]
|
/-- When `s` is an infinite set, `nth` agrees with `Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat`. -/
theorem nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) :
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Nth.lean | 127 | 129 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.