Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.StarRingHom
/-!
# Morphisms of star algebras
This file defines morphisms between `R`-algebras (unital or non-unital) `A` and `B` where both
`A` and `B` are equipped with a `star` operation. These morphisms, namely `StarAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalStarAlgHom` are direct extensions of their non-`star`red counterparts with a field
`map_star` which guarantees they preserve the star operation. We keep the type classes as generic
as possible, in keeping with the definition of `NonUnitalAlgHom` in the non-unital case. In this
file, we only assume `Star` unless we want to talk about the zero map as a
`NonUnitalStarAlgHom`, in which case we need `StarAddMonoid`. Note that the scalar ring `R`
is not required to have a star operation, nor do we need `StarRing` or `StarModule` structures on
`A` and `B`.
As with `NonUnitalAlgHom`, in the non-unital case the multiplications are not assumed to be
associative or unital, or even to be compatible with the scalar actions. In a typical application,
the operations will satisfy compatibility conditions making them into algebras (albeit possibly
non-associative and/or non-unital) but such conditions are not required here for the definitions.
The primary impetus for defining these types is that they constitute the morphisms in the categories
of unital C⋆-algebras (with `StarAlgHom`s) and of C⋆-algebras (with `NonUnitalStarAlgHom`s).
## Main definitions
* `NonUnitalStarAlgHom`
* `StarAlgHom`
## Tags
non-unital, algebra, morphism, star
-/
open EquivLike
/-! ### Non-unital star algebra homomorphisms -/
/-- A *non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism* is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between
non-unital `R`-algebras `A` and `B` equipped with a `star` operation, and this homomorphism is
also `star`-preserving. -/
structure NonUnitalStarAlgHom (R A B : Type*) [Monoid R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
[DistribMulAction R A] [Star A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B]
[Star B] extends A →ₙₐ[R] B where
/-- By definition, a non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism preserves the `star` operation. -/
map_star' : ∀ a : A, toFun (star a) = star (toFun a)
@[inherit_doc NonUnitalStarAlgHom] infixr:25 " →⋆ₙₐ " => NonUnitalStarAlgHom _
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 A " →⋆ₙₐ[" R "] " B => NonUnitalStarAlgHom R A B
/-- Reinterpret a non-unital star algebra homomorphism as a non-unital algebra homomorphism
by forgetting the interaction with the star operation. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalStarAlgHom.toNonUnitalAlgHom
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass
variable {F R A B : Type*} [Monoid R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [Star B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B` and `StarHomClass F A B`
into an actual `NonUnitalStarAlgHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to
`A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toNonUnitalStarAlgHom [StarHomClass F A B] (f : F) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) with
map_star' := map_star f }
instance [StarHomClass F A B] : CoeTC F (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toNonUnitalStarAlgHom⟩
instance [StarHomClass F A B] : NonUnitalStarRingHomClass F A B :=
NonUnitalStarRingHomClass.mk
end NonUnitalStarAlgHomClass
namespace NonUnitalStarAlgHom
section Basic
variable {R A B C D : Type*} [Monoid R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [Star A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [Star B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [DistribMulAction R C] [Star C]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring D] [DistribMulAction R D] [Star D]
instance : FunLike (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) A B where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟨⟨g, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ h; congr
instance : NonUnitalAlgHomClass (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_smulₛₗ f := f.map_smul'
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
instance : StarHomClass (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) A B where
map_star f := f.map_star'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 we didn't need the `Simps.apply` hint.
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B := f
initialize_simps_projections NonUnitalStarAlgHom
(toFun → apply)
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
[StarHomClass F A B] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalAlgHom {f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B} : (f.toNonUnitalAlgHom : A → B) = f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
/-- Copy of a `NonUnitalStarAlgHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful
to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B where
toFun := f'
map_smul' := h.symm ▸ map_smul f
map_zero' := h.symm ▸ map_zero f
map_add' := h.symm ▸ map_add f
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ map_mul f
map_star' := h.symm ▸ map_star f
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : A → B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂, h₃⟩, h₄⟩, h₅⟩ : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
-- this is probably the more useful lemma for Lean 4 and should likely replace `coe_mk` above
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (h) :
((⟨f, h⟩ : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂, h₃⟩, h₄⟩, h₅⟩ : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) = f := by
ext
rfl
section
variable (R A)
/-- The identity as a non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
protected def id : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ (1 : A →ₙₐ[R] A) with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id R A) = id :=
rfl
end
/-- The composition of non-unital ⋆-algebra homomorphisms, as a non-unital ⋆-algebra
homomorphism. -/
def comp (f : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C :=
{ f.toNonUnitalAlgHom.comp g.toNonUnitalAlgHom with
map_star' := by
simp only [map_star, NonUnitalAlgHom.toFun_eq_coe, eq_self_iff_true, NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_comp,
coe_toNonUnitalAlgHom, Function.comp_apply, forall_const] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : ⇑(comp f g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) (a : A) : comp f g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : C →⋆ₙₐ[R] D) (g : B →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) (h : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id _ _).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : f.comp (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id _ _) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
instance : Monoid (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) where
mul := comp
mul_assoc := comp_assoc
one := NonUnitalStarAlgHom.id R A
one_mul := id_comp
mul_one := comp_id
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) : A → A) = id :=
rfl
theorem one_apply (a : A) : (1 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) a = a :=
rfl
end Basic
section Zero
-- the `zero` requires extra type class assumptions because we need `star_zero`
variable {R A B C D : Type*} [Monoid R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [DistribMulAction R A] [StarAddMonoid A]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [DistribMulAction R B] [StarAddMonoid B]
instance : Zero (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
⟨{ (0 : NonUnitalAlgHom (MonoidHom.id R) A B) with map_star' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : MonoidWithZero (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Monoid (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A)),
inferInstanceAs (Zero (A →⋆ₙₐ[R] A)) with
zero_mul := fun _ => ext fun _ => rfl
mul_zero := fun f => ext fun _ => map_zero f }
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) : A → B) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem zero_apply (a : A) : (0 : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) a = 0 :=
rfl
end Zero
section RestrictScalars
variable (R : Type*) {S A B : Type*} [Monoid R] [Monoid S] [Star A] [Star B]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [MulAction R S]
[DistribMulAction S A] [DistribMulAction S B] [DistribMulAction R A] [DistribMulAction R B]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
/-- If a monoid `R` acts on another monoid `S`, then a non-unital star algebra homomorphism
over `S` can be viewed as a non-unital star algebra homomorphism over `R`. -/
def restrictScalars (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →ₙₐ[S] B).restrictScalars R with
map_star' := map_star f }
@[simp]
lemma restrictScalars_apply (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) (x : A) : f.restrictScalars R x = f x := rfl
lemma coe_restrictScalars (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A →ₙ+* B) = f := rfl
lemma coe_restrictScalars' (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A → B) = f := rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (A →⋆ₙₐ[S] B) → A →⋆ₙₐ[R] B) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ext (DFunLike.congr_fun h :)
end RestrictScalars
end NonUnitalStarAlgHom
/-! ### Unital star algebra homomorphisms -/
section Unital
/-- A *⋆-algebra homomorphism* is an algebra homomorphism between `R`-algebras `A` and `B`
equipped with a `star` operation, and this homomorphism is also `star`-preserving. -/
structure StarAlgHom (R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Star B] extends AlgHom R A B where
/-- By definition, a ⋆-algebra homomorphism preserves the `star` operation. -/
map_star' : ∀ x : A, toFun (star x) = star (toFun x)
@[inherit_doc StarAlgHom] infixr:25 " →⋆ₐ " => StarAlgHom _
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 A " →⋆ₐ[" R "] " B => StarAlgHom R A B
/-- Reinterpret a unital star algebra homomorphism as a unital algebra homomorphism
by forgetting the interaction with the star operation. -/
add_decl_doc StarAlgHom.toAlgHom
namespace StarAlgHomClass
variable {F R A B : Type*}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A]
variable [Semiring B] [Algebra R B] [Star B] [FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B]
variable [StarHomClass F A B]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AlgHomClass F R A B` and `StarHomClass F A B` into an
actual `StarAlgHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A →⋆ₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toStarAlgHom (f : F) : A →⋆ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →ₐ[R] B) with
map_star' := map_star f }
instance : CoeTC F (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toStarAlgHom⟩
end StarAlgHomClass
namespace StarAlgHom
variable {F R A B C D : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Star A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Star B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] [Star C] [Semiring D] [Algebra R D] [Star D]
instance : FunLike (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) A B where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' := by rintro ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨g, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩, _⟩ h; congr
instance : AlgHomClass (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) R A B where
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
map_one f := f.map_one'
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
commutes f := f.commutes'
instance : StarHomClass (A →⋆ₐ[R] B) A B where
map_star f := f.map_star'
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [AlgHomClass F R A B]
[StarHomClass F A B] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) = f :=
rfl
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 we didn't need the `Simps.apply` hint.
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A → B := f
initialize_simps_projections StarAlgHom (toFun → apply)
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAlgHom {f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B} : (f.toAlgHom : A → B) = f :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
/-- Copy of a `StarAlgHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful
to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : A →⋆ₐ[R] B where
toFun := f'
map_one' := h.symm ▸ map_one f
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ map_mul f
map_zero' := h.symm ▸ map_zero f
map_add' := h.symm ▸ map_add f
commutes' := h.symm ▸ AlgHomClass.commutes f
map_star' := h.symm ▸ map_star f
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (f' : A → B) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : A → B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ h₆) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄⟩, h₅⟩, h₆⟩ : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
-- this is probably the more useful lemma for Lean 4 and should likely replace `coe_mk` above
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (h) :
((⟨f, h⟩ : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A → B) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ h₆) :
(⟨⟨⟨⟨⟨f, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄⟩, h₅⟩, h₆⟩ : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) = f := by
ext
rfl
section
variable (R A)
/-- The identity as a `StarAlgHom`. -/
protected def id : A →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
{ AlgHom.id _ _ with map_star' := fun _ => rfl }
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(StarAlgHom.id R A) = id :=
rfl
/-- `algebraMap R A` as a `StarAlgHom` when `A` is a star algebra over `R`. -/
@[simps]
def ofId (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R] [Semiring A] [StarMul A]
[Algebra R A] [StarModule R A] : R →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
{ Algebra.ofId R A with
toFun := algebraMap R A
map_star' := by simp [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] }
end
instance : Inhabited (A →⋆ₐ[R] A) :=
⟨StarAlgHom.id R A⟩
/-- The composition of ⋆-algebra homomorphisms, as a ⋆-algebra homomorphism. -/
def comp (f : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : A →⋆ₐ[R] C :=
{ f.toAlgHom.comp g.toAlgHom with
map_star' := by
simp only [map_star, AlgHom.toFun_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_comp, coe_toAlgHom,
Function.comp_apply, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : ⇑(comp f g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (g : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) (a : A) : comp f g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : C →⋆ₐ[R] D) (g : B →⋆ₐ[R] C) (h : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : (StarAlgHom.id _ _).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : A →⋆ₐ[R] B) : f.comp (StarAlgHom.id _ _) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
instance : Monoid (A →⋆ₐ[R] A) where
mul := comp
mul_assoc := comp_assoc
| one := StarAlgHom.id R A
one_mul := id_comp
mul_one := comp_id
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/StarAlgHom.lean | 452 | 455 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
/-!
# Projection to a subspace
In this file we define
* `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl (p q : Submodule R E) (h : IsCompl p q)`:
the projection of a module `E` to a submodule `p` along its complement `q`;
it is the unique linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`.
* `Submodule.isComplEquivProj p`: equivalence between submodules `q`
such that `IsCompl p q` and projections `f : E → p`, `∀ x ∈ p, f x = x`.
We also provide some lemmas justifying correctness of our definitions.
## Tags
projection, complement subspace
-/
noncomputable section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
variable (p q : Submodule R E)
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module S M] (m : Submodule S M)
namespace LinearMap
variable {p}
open Submodule
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
ker (id - p.subtype.comp f) = p := by
ext x
simp only [comp_apply, mem_ker, subtype_apply, sub_apply, id_apply, sub_eq_zero]
exact ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ Submodule.coe_mem _, fun hx => by rw [hf ⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩
theorem range_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 fun x => ⟨x, hf x⟩
theorem isCompl_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : IsCompl p (ker f) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hpx, hfx⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, hf ⟨x, hpx⟩, mk_eq_zero] at hfx
simp only [hfx, SetLike.mem_coe, zero_mem]
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
intro x _
rw [mem_sup']
refine ⟨f x, ⟨x - f x, ?_⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
rw [mem_ker, LinearMap.map_sub, hf, sub_self]
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `M/p ≃ q`. -/
def quotientEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (E ⧸ p) ≃ₗ[R] q :=
LinearEquiv.symm <|
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.mkQ.comp q.subtype)
⟨by rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_comp, ker_mkQ, disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot.1 h.symm.disjoint], by
rw [← range_eq_top, range_comp, range_subtype, map_mkQ_eq_top, h.sup_eq_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
-- Porting note: type ascriptions needed on the RHS
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (Quotient.mk x : E ⧸ p) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply_mk_coe (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h (Quotient.mk x) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
theorem mk_quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E ⧸ p) :
(Quotient.mk (quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h x) : E ⧸ p) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_apply x
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `p × q` is isomorphic to `E`. It is the unique
linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`. -/
def prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (p × q) ≃ₗ[R] E := by
apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype)
constructor
· rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range, ker_subtype, ker_subtype, prod_bot]
rw [range_subtype, range_subtype]
exact h.1
· rw [← range_eq_top, ← sup_eq_range, h.sup_eq_top]
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h : p × q →ₗ[R] E) = p.subtype.coprod q.subtype := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p × q) :
prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h x = x.1 + x.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (x, 0) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (0, x) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).1 = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_left _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_right_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).2 = 0 ↔ x ∈ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_right _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_left_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
LinearEquiv.prodComm R q p ≪≫ₗ prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h = prodEquivOfIsCompl q p h.symm :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => add_comm _ _
/-- Projection to a submodule along a complement.
See also `LinearMap.linearProjOfIsCompl`. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : E →ₗ[R] p :=
LinearMap.fst R p q ∘ₗ ↑(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = x := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_range (h : IsCompl p q) : range (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_of_proj (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_surjective (h : IsCompl p q) :
Function.Surjective (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) :=
range_eq_top.mp (linearProjOfIsCompl_range h)
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) (hx : x ∈ q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
(linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h).2 hx
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' h x x.2
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_ker (h : IsCompl p q) : ker (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = q :=
ext fun _ => mem_ker.trans (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_comp_subtype (h : IsCompl p q) :
(linearProjOfIsCompl p q h).comp p.subtype = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_idempotent (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x) = linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃! u : p × q, (u.fst : E) + u.snd = x :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hc).toEquiv.bijective.existsUnique _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃ (u : p) (v : q), (u : E) + v = x ∧ ∀ (r : p) (s : q), (r : E) + s = x → r = u ∧ s = v :=
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod hc x
⟨u.1, u.2, hu₁, fun r s hrs => Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 (hu₂ ⟨r, s⟩ hrs)⟩
theorem linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self (hpq : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
(p.linearProjOfIsCompl q hpq x + q.linearProjOfIsCompl p hpq.symm x : E) = x := by
dsimp only [linearProjOfIsCompl]
rw [← prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq]
exact (prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq).apply_symm_apply x
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
/-- Projection to the image of an injection along a complement.
This has an advantage over `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl` in that it allows the user better
definitional control over the type. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
(LinearEquiv.ofInjective i hi).symm ∘ₗ (LinearMap.range i).linearProjOfIsCompl q h
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) (x : F) :
linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h (i x) = x := by
let ix : LinearMap.range i := ⟨i x, mem_range_self i x⟩
change linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h ix = x
rw [linearProjOfIsCompl, coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left, Subtype.ext_iff,
LinearEquiv.ofInjective_apply]
/-- Given linear maps `φ` and `ψ` from complement submodules, `LinearMap.ofIsCompl` is
the induced linear map over the entire module. -/
def ofIsCompl {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q) (φ : p →ₗ[R] F) (ψ : q →ₗ[R] F) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
LinearMap.coprod φ ψ ∘ₗ ↑(Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_left_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (u : p) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (u : E) = φ u := by simp [ofIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_right_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (v : q) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (v : E) = ψ v := by simp [ofIsCompl]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : ∀ u, φ u = χ u) (hψ : ∀ u, ψ u = χ u) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ := by
ext x
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl h x
simp [ofIsCompl, hφ, hψ]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq' (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : φ = χ.comp p.subtype) (hψ : ψ = χ.comp q.subtype) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ :=
ofIsCompl_eq h (fun _ => hφ.symm ▸ rfl) fun _ => hψ.symm ▸ rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_zero (h : IsCompl p q) : (ofIsCompl h 0 0 : E →ₗ[R] F) = 0 :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_add (h : IsCompl p q) {φ₁ φ₂ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ₁ ψ₂ : q →ₗ[R] F} :
ofIsCompl h (φ₁ + φ₂) (ψ₁ + ψ₂) = ofIsCompl h φ₁ ψ₁ + ofIsCompl h φ₂ ψ₂ :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
{F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q)
{φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (c : R) : ofIsCompl h (c • φ) (c • ψ) = c • ofIsCompl h φ ψ :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (by simp) (by simp)
section
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Module R₁ E] [Module R₁ F]
/-- The linear map from `(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)` to `E →ₗ[R₁] F`. -/
| def ofIsComplProd {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q) :
(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F) →ₗ[R₁] E →ₗ[R₁] F where
toFun φ := ofIsCompl h φ.1 φ.2
map_add' := by intro φ ψ; rw [Prod.snd_add, Prod.fst_add, ofIsCompl_add]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projection.lean | 266 | 269 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Congruence.Defs
/-!
# Congruence relations on rings
This file contains basic results concerning congruence relations on rings,
which extend `Con` and `AddCon` on monoids and additive monoids.
Most of the time you likely want to use the `Ideal.Quotient` API that is built on top of this.
## Main Definitions
* `RingCon R`: the type of congruence relations respecting `+` and `*`.
* `RingConGen r`: the inductively defined smallest ring congruence relation containing a given
binary relation.
## TODO
* Use this for `RingQuot` too.
* Copy across more API from `Con` and `AddCon` in `GroupTheory/Congruence.lean`.
-/
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace RingCon
section Quotient
section Algebraic
/-! ### Scalar multiplication
The operation of scalar multiplication `•` descends naturally to the quotient.
-/
section SMul
variable [Add R] [MulOneClass R]
variable [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
variable [SMul β R] [IsScalarTower β R R]
variable (c : RingCon R)
instance : SMul α c.Quotient := inferInstanceAs (SMul α c.toCon.Quotient)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : α) (x : R) : (↑(a • x) : c.Quotient) = a • (x : c.Quotient) :=
rfl
instance [SMulCommClass α β R] : SMulCommClass α β c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (SMulCommClass α β c.toCon.Quotient)
instance [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower α β R] : IsScalarTower α β c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (IsScalarTower α β c.toCon.Quotient)
instance [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar α R] : IsCentralScalar α c.Quotient :=
inferInstanceAs (IsCentralScalar α c.toCon.Quotient)
end SMul
instance isScalarTower_right [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
(c : RingCon R) : IsScalarTower α c.Quotient c.Quotient where
smul_assoc _ := Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| smul_mul_assoc _ _ _
instance smulCommClass [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass α R R] (c : RingCon R) : SMulCommClass α c.Quotient c.Quotient where
smul_comm _ := Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg Quotient.mk'' <| (mul_smul_comm _ _ _).symm
instance smulCommClass' [Add R] [MulOneClass R] [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
[SMulCommClass R α R] (c : RingCon R) : SMulCommClass c.Quotient α c.Quotient :=
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm R α R
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
instance [Monoid α] [NonAssocSemiring R] [DistribMulAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R]
(c : RingCon R) : DistribMulAction α c.Quotient :=
{ c.toCon.mulAction with
smul_zero := fun _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_zero _
smul_add := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_add _ _ _ }
instance [Monoid α] [Semiring R] [MulSemiringAction α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] (c : RingCon R) :
MulSemiringAction α c.Quotient :=
{ smul_one := fun _ => congr_arg toQuotient <| smul_one _
smul_mul := fun _ => Quotient.ind₂' fun _ _ => congr_arg toQuotient <|
MulSemiringAction.smul_mul _ _ _ }
end Algebraic
end Quotient
/-! ### Lattice structure
The API in this section is copied from `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Congruence.lean`
-/
section Lattice
variable [Add R] [Mul R]
/-- For congruence relations `c, d` on a type `M` with multiplication and addition, `c ≤ d` iff
`∀ x y ∈ M`, `x` is related to `y` by `d` if `x` is related to `y` by `c`. -/
instance : LE (RingCon R) where
le c d := ∀ ⦃x y⦄, c x y → d x y
/-- Definition of `≤` for congruence relations. -/
theorem le_def {c d : RingCon R} : c ≤ d ↔ ∀ {x y}, c x y → d x y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations on a given type with multiplication and
addition. -/
instance : InfSet (RingCon R) where
sInf S :=
{ r := fun x y => ∀ c : RingCon R, c ∈ S → c x y
iseqv :=
⟨fun x c _hc => c.refl x, fun h c hc => c.symm <| h c hc, fun h1 h2 c hc =>
c.trans (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc
mul' := fun h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc }
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying equivalence relation. -/
theorem sInf_toSetoid (S : Set (RingCon R)) : (sInf S).toSetoid = sInf ((·.toSetoid) '' S) :=
Setoid.ext fun x y =>
⟨fun h r ⟨c, hS, hr⟩ => by rw [← hr]; exact h c hS, fun h c hS => h c.toSetoid ⟨c, hS, rfl⟩⟩
/-- The infimum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the infimum of the set's image
under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (RingCon R)) : ⇑(sInf S) = sInf ((⇑) '' S) := by
ext; simp only [sInf_image, iInf_apply, iInf_Prop_eq]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → RingCon R) : ⇑(iInf f) = ⨅ i, ⇑(f i) := by
rw [iInf, coe_sInf, ← Set.range_comp, sInf_range, Function.comp_def]
instance : PartialOrder (RingCon R) where
le_refl _c _ _ := id
le_trans _c1 _c2 _c3 h1 h2 _x _y h := h2 <| h1 h
le_antisymm _c _d hc hd := ext fun _x _y => ⟨fun h => hc h, fun h => hd h⟩
/-- The complete lattice of congruence relations on a given type with multiplication and
addition. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (RingCon R) where
__ := completeLatticeOfInf (RingCon R) fun s =>
⟨fun r hr x y h => (h : ∀ r ∈ s, (r : RingCon R) x y) r hr,
fun _r hr _x _y h _r' hr' => hr hr' h⟩
inf c d :=
{ toSetoid := c.toSetoid ⊓ d.toSetoid
mul' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.mul h1.1 h2.1, d.mul h1.2 h2.2⟩
add' := fun h1 h2 => ⟨c.add h1.1 h2.1, d.add h1.2 h2.2⟩ }
inf_le_left _ _ := fun _ _ h => h.1
inf_le_right _ _ := fun _ _ h => h.2
le_inf _ _ _ hb hc := fun _ _ h => ⟨hb h, hc h⟩
top :=
{ (⊤ : Setoid R) with
mul' := fun _ _ => trivial
add' := fun _ _ => trivial }
le_top _ := fun _ _ _h => trivial
bot :=
{ (⊥ : Setoid R) with
mul' := congr_arg₂ _
add' := congr_arg₂ _ }
bot_le c := fun x _y h => h ▸ c.refl x
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ⇑(⊤ : RingCon R) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : RingCon R) = Eq := rfl
/-- The infimum of two congruence relations equals the infimum of the underlying binary
operations. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf {c d : RingCon R} : ⇑(c ⊓ d) = ⇑c ⊓ ⇑d := rfl
/-- Definition of the infimum of two congruence relations. -/
theorem inf_iff_and {c d : RingCon R} {x y} : (c ⊓ d) x y ↔ c x y ∧ d x y :=
Iff.rfl
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (RingCon R) where
exists_pair_ne :=
let ⟨x, y, ne⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
⟨⊥, ⊤, ne_of_apply_ne (· x y) <| by simp [ne]⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (RingCon R) where
allEq c c' := ext fun r r' ↦ by simp_rw [Subsingleton.elim r' r, c.refl, c'.refl]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (RingCon R) ↔ Nontrivial R := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
on_goal 1 => simp_rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, not_iff_not]
all_goals exact iff_of_true inferInstance ‹_›
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (RingCon R) ↔ Subsingleton R := by
simp_rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, nontrivial_iff]
/-- The inductively defined smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` equals
the infimum of the set of congruence relations containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_eq (r : R → R → Prop) :
ringConGen r = sInf {s : RingCon R | ∀ x y, r x y → s x y} :=
le_antisymm
(fun _x _y H =>
RingConGen.Rel.recOn H (fun _ _ h _ hs => hs _ _ h) (RingCon.refl _)
(fun _ => RingCon.symm _) (fun _ _ => RingCon.trans _)
(fun _ _ h1 h2 c hc => c.add (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc)
(fun _ _ h1 h2 c hc => c.mul (h1 c hc) <| h2 c hc))
(sInf_le fun _ _ => RingConGen.Rel.of _ _)
/-- The smallest congruence relation containing a binary relation `r` is contained in any
congruence relation containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_le {r : R → R → Prop} {c : RingCon R}
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → c x y) : ringConGen r ≤ c := by
rw [ringConGen_eq]; exact sInf_le h
/-- Given binary relations `r, s` with `r` contained in `s`, the smallest congruence relation
containing `s` contains the smallest congruence relation containing `r`. -/
theorem ringConGen_mono {r s : R → R → Prop} (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) :
ringConGen r ≤ ringConGen s :=
ringConGen_le fun x y hr => RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| h x y hr
/-- Congruence relations equal the smallest congruence relation in which they are contained. -/
theorem ringConGen_of_ringCon (c : RingCon R) : ringConGen c = c :=
le_antisymm (by rw [ringConGen_eq]; exact sInf_le fun _ _ => id) RingConGen.Rel.of
/-- The map sending a binary relation to the smallest congruence relation in which it is
contained is idempotent. -/
theorem ringConGen_idem (r : R → R → Prop) : ringConGen (ringConGen r) = ringConGen r :=
ringConGen_of_ringCon _
/-- The supremum of congruence relations `c, d` equals the smallest congruence relation containing
the binary relation '`x` is related to `y` by `c` or `d`'. -/
theorem sup_eq_ringConGen (c d : RingCon R) : c ⊔ d = ringConGen fun x y => c x y ∨ d x y := by
rw [ringConGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
simp only [le_def, or_imp, ← forall_and]
/-- The supremum of two congruence relations equals the smallest congruence relation containing
the supremum of the underlying binary operations. -/
theorem sup_def {c d : RingCon R} : c ⊔ d = ringConGen (⇑c ⊔ ⇑d) := by
rw [sup_eq_ringConGen]; rfl
/-- The supremum of a set of congruence relations `S` equals the smallest congruence relation
containing the binary relation 'there exists `c ∈ S` such that `x` is related to `y` by
`c`'. -/
theorem sSup_eq_ringConGen (S : Set (RingCon R)) :
sSup S = ringConGen fun x y => ∃ c : RingCon R, c ∈ S ∧ c x y := by
rw [ringConGen_eq]
apply congr_arg sInf
ext
exact ⟨fun h _ _ ⟨r, hr⟩ => h hr.1 hr.2, fun h r hS _ _ hr => h _ _ ⟨r, hS, hr⟩⟩
/-- The supremum of a set of congruence relations is the same as the smallest congruence relation
containing the supremum of the set's image under the map to the underlying binary relation. -/
theorem sSup_def {S : Set (RingCon R)} :
sSup S = ringConGen (sSup (@Set.image (RingCon R) (R → R → Prop) (⇑) S)) := by
rw [sSup_eq_ringConGen, sSup_image]
congr with (x y)
simp only [sSup_image, iSup_apply, iSup_Prop_eq, exists_prop, rel_eq_coe]
variable (R)
/-- There is a Galois insertion of congruence relations on a type with multiplication and addition
`R` into binary relations on `R`. -/
protected def gi : @GaloisInsertion (R → R → Prop) (RingCon R) _ _ ringConGen (⇑) where
choice r _h := ringConGen r
gc _r c :=
⟨fun H _ _ h => H <| RingConGen.Rel.of _ _ h, fun H =>
ringConGen_of_ringCon c ▸ ringConGen_mono H⟩
le_l_u x := (ringConGen_of_ringCon x).symm ▸ le_refl x
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
end Lattice
end RingCon
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Congruence/Basic.lean | 591 | 595 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow₀ one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
rcases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h | h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
theorem quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five :
letI c := cos (π / 5)
4 * c ^ 2 - 2 * c - 1 = 0 := by
set θ := π / 5 with hθ
set c := cos θ
set s := sin θ
suffices 2 * c = 4 * c ^ 2 - 1 by simp [this]
have hs : s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, sin_eq_zero_iff, hθ]
push_neg
intro n hn
replace hn : n * 5 = 1 := by field_simp [mul_comm _ π, mul_assoc] at hn; norm_cast at hn
omega
suffices s * (2 * c) = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) from mul_left_cancel₀ hs this
calc s * (2 * c) = 2 * s * c := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm 2]
_ = sin (2 * θ) := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = sin (π - 2 * θ) := by rw [sin_pi_sub]
_ = sin (2 * θ + θ) := by congr; field_simp [hθ]; linarith
_ = sin (2 * θ) * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := sin_add (2 * θ) θ
_ = 2 * s * c * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = 2 * s * c * c + (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) * s := by rw [cos_two_mul]
_ = s * (2 * c * c) + s * (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
_ = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
open Polynomial in
| theorem Polynomial.isRoot_cos_pi_div_five :
(4 • X ^ 2 - 2 • X - C 1 : ℝ[X]).IsRoot (cos (π / 5)) := by
simpa using quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
/-- The cosine of `π / 5` is `(1 + √5) / 4`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 819 | 823 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive (attr := simp) toReal_enorm]
lemma toReal_enorm' (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toReal = ‖x‖ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ofReal_norm]
lemma ofReal_norm' (x : E) : .ofReal ‖x‖ = ‖x‖ₑ := by
simp [enorm, ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal, nnnorm]
@[to_additive enorm_eq_iff_norm_eq]
theorem enorm'_eq_iff_norm_eq {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by congr⟩
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _) (norm_nonneg' _)).mp (ENNReal.coe_inj.mp h)
@[to_additive enorm_le_iff_norm_le]
theorem enorm'_le_iff_norm_le {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by gcongr⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _)] at h
exact h
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_right (a : E) : nndist a 1 = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma edist_one_right (a : E) : edist a 1 = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [edist_nndist, nndist_one_right, enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := NNReal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le]
lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ‖a ^ n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simpa [pow_succ, add_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le' norm_pow_le_mul_norm le_rfl
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le]
lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm {n : ℕ} : ‖a ^ n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ := by
simpa only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_natCast] using norm_pow_le_mul_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_abs_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_abs a n
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_natAbs_smul]
theorem nnnorm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_pow_natAbs a n
@[to_additive nnnorm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_isUnit a hn
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_left (a : E) : nndist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_one_left (a : E) : edist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_one_left]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma enorm_div_le : ‖a / b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add] using nnnorm_div_le a b
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
/-- An analogue of `nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add' (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add' _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
end NNNorm
section ENorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_zero]
lemma enorm_one' {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E] : ‖(1 : E)‖ₑ = 0 := by
rw [ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive exists_enorm_lt]
lemma exists_enorm_lt' (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
[hbot : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (1 : E))] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : ∃ x ≠ (1 : E), ‖x‖ₑ < c :=
frequently_iff_neBot.mpr hbot |>.and_eventually
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.tendsto' 1 0 (by simp) |>.eventually_lt_const hc.bot_lt)
|>.exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_neg]
lemma enorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
lemma ofReal_norm_eq_enorm' (a : E) : .ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ₑ := ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'
instance : ENorm ℝ≥0∞ where
enorm x := x
@[simp] lemma enorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0∞) : ‖x‖ₑ = x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_enorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖ₑ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub := edist_eq_enorm_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div := edist_eq_enorm_div
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_one_eq_enorm (x : E) : edist x 1 = ‖x‖ₑ := by rw [edist_eq_enorm_div, div_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm := edist_zero_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' := edist_one_eq_enorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball 1 r ↔ ‖a‖ₑ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_one_eq_enorm]
end ENorm
section ContinuousENorm
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousENorm E]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma continuous_enorm : Continuous fun a : E ↦ ‖a‖ₑ := ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → E} {s : Set X} {a : X}
@[fun_prop]
lemma Continuous.enorm : Continuous f → Continuous (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
continuous_enorm.comp
lemma ContinuousAt.enorm {a : X} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) a := by fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.enorm {s : Set X} {a : X} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) s a :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousWithinAt).comp (t := Set.univ) h
(fun _ _ ↦ by trivial)
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousOn.enorm (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (‖f ·‖ₑ) s :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousOn).comp (t := Set.univ) h <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
end ContinuousENorm
section ENormedMonoid
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
@[to_additive enorm_add_le]
lemma enorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := ENormedMonoid.enorm_mul_le a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_eq_zero]
lemma enorm_eq_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [enorm, ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive enorm_ne_zero]
lemma enorm_ne_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
enorm_eq_zero'.ne
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_pos]
lemma enorm_pos' {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ₑ ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans enorm_ne_zero'
end ENormedMonoid
instance : ENormedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0∞ where
continuous_enorm := continuous_id
enorm_eq_zero := by simp
enorm_add_le := by simp
open Set in
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds (x : E) (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 x) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y / x‖ := by
simp [NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt x |>.disjoint_iff_left, compl_setOf, eventually_iff]
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds_one (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 1) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simpa using disjoint_nhds 1 f
end SeminormedGroup
section Induced
variable (E F)
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a `SeminormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.induced [Group E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ PseudoMetricSpace.induced f toPseudoMetricSpace with
norm := fun x => ‖f x‖
dist_eq := fun x y => by simp only [map_div, ← dist_eq_norm_div]; rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a
`SeminormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddCommGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.induced
[CommGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `NormedGroup` induces a `NormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`NormedAddGroup` induces a `NormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedGroup.induced
[Group E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (h : Injective f) :
NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `NormedGroup` induces a
`NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a
`NormedCommGroup` induces a `NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.induced [CommGroup E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : Injective f) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end Induced
namespace Real
variable {r : ℝ}
instance norm : Norm ℝ where
norm r := |r|
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ = |r| :=
rfl
instance normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup ℝ :=
⟨fun _r _y => rfl⟩
theorem norm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ = r :=
abs_of_nonneg hr
theorem norm_of_nonpos (hr : r ≤ 0) : ‖r‖ = -r :=
abs_of_nonpos hr
theorem le_norm_self (r : ℝ) : r ≤ ‖r‖ :=
le_abs_self r
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖₊ = n := NNReal.eq <| norm_natCast _
@[simp 1100] lemma enorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ₑ = n := by simp [enorm]
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖ = ofNat(n) := norm_natCast n
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖₊ = ofNat(n) := nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖ = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖₊ = 2 := NNReal.eq <| by simp
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖ = q := norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm, -norm_eq_abs]
theorem nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖₊ = ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_of_nonneg hr
lemma enorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
simp [enorm, nnnorm_of_nonneg hr, ENNReal.ofReal, toNNReal, hr]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖₊ = ‖r‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖ₑ = ‖r‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, norm_of_nonneg hr]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal := enorm_eq_ofReal
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ₑ = ENNReal.ofReal |r| := by
rw [← enorm_eq_ofReal (abs_nonneg _), enorm_abs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal_abs := enorm_eq_ofReal_abs
theorem toNNReal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ‖r‖₊ := by
rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg hr]
ext
rw [coe_mk, coe_nnnorm r, Real.norm_eq_abs r, abs_of_nonneg hr]
-- Porting note: this is due to the change from `Subtype.val` to `NNReal.toReal` for the coercion
theorem ofReal_le_enorm (r : ℝ) : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ‖r‖ₑ := by
rw [enorm_eq_ofReal_abs]; gcongr; exact le_abs_self _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_le_ennnorm := ofReal_le_enorm
end Real
namespace NNReal
instance : NNNorm ℝ≥0 where
nnnorm x := x
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0) : ‖x‖₊ = x := rfl
end NNReal
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ← norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
theorem norm_multiset_sum_le {E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (m : Multiset E) :
‖m.sum‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum :=
m.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]
refine Multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[bound]
theorem norm_sum_le {ι E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∑ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
s.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le f
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_sum]
refine Finset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _ _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le s f).trans <| Finset.sum_le_sum h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f a : ι → E} {d : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) ≤ d b) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, d b := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, ← Finset.prod_div_distrib] at *
exact norm_prod_le_of_le s h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f a : ι → E) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) :=
dist_prod_prod_le_of_le s fun _ _ => le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ < r := by
rw [mem_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_iff_norm : a * b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' ball a r = ball (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_closedBall (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
(b * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall a r = closedBall (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_sphere (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' sphere a r = sphere (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_iff_norm', div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_closedBall {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ closedBall b r) :
a ^ n ∈ closedBall (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine norm_pow_le_mul_norm.trans ?_
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h n.cast_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_ball {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ∈ ball b r) : a ^ n ∈ ball (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt norm_pow_le_mul_norm ?_
replace hn : 0 < (n : ℝ) := by norm_cast
rw [nsmul_eq_mul]
nlinarith
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ closedBall (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ closedBall b r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ ball (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ ball b r := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_closedBall'' : a • closedBall b r = closedBall (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_closedBall, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, div_eq_inv_mul, ←
eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ball'' : a • ball b r = ball (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_ball, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, _root_.div_eq_inv_mul,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖₊ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖₊).sum :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
rw [Multiset.map_map]
exact norm_multiset_prod_le _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ a ∈ s, f a‖₊ ≤ ∑ a ∈ s, ‖f a‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
exact norm_prod_le _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖₊ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖₊ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le_of_le s h).trans_eq (NNReal.coe_sum ..).symm
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the LHS doesn't simplify
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) norm_norm]
lemma norm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖ = ‖x‖ := Real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg' _)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_norm]
lemma nnnorm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_norm]
lemma enorm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖ₑ = ‖x‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
lemma enorm_enorm {ε : Type*} [ENorm ε] (x : ε) : ‖‖x‖ₑ‖ₑ = ‖x‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
end SeminormedCommGroup
section NormedGroup
variable [NormedGroup E] {a b : E}
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_le_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_pos_iff]
lemma norm_pos_iff' : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := by rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_zero]
lemma norm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := (norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'
@[to_additive norm_ne_zero_iff]
lemma norm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_eq_zero'.not
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_le_zero_iff'' := norm_le_zero_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_le_zero_iff''' := norm_le_zero_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_pos_iff'' := norm_pos_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_eq_zero'' := norm_eq_zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_eq_zero''' := norm_eq_zero'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_eq_zero_iff : ‖a / b‖ = 0 ↔ a = b := by rw [norm_eq_zero', div_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_pos_iff : 0 < ‖a / b‖ ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [(norm_nonneg' _).lt_iff_ne, ne_comm]
exact norm_div_eq_zero_iff.not
@[to_additive eq_of_norm_sub_le_zero]
theorem eq_of_norm_div_le_zero (h : ‖a / b‖ ≤ 0) : a = b := by
rwa [← div_eq_one, ← norm_le_zero_iff']
alias ⟨eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero, _⟩ := norm_div_eq_zero_iff
attribute [to_additive] eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_norm_pos (a : E) : a = 1 ∨ 0 < ‖a‖ := by
simpa [eq_comm] using (norm_nonneg' a).eq_or_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_nnnorm_pos (a : E) : a = 1 ∨ 0 < ‖a‖₊ :=
eq_one_or_norm_pos a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_eq_zero]
theorem nnnorm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖₊ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_eq_zero, coe_nnnorm', norm_eq_zero']
@[to_additive nnnorm_ne_zero_iff]
theorem nnnorm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
nnnorm_eq_zero'.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_pos]
lemma nnnorm_pos' : 0 < ‖a‖₊ ↔ a ≠ 1 := pos_iff_ne_zero.trans nnnorm_ne_zero_iff'
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a normed group as a group norm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a normed group as an additive group norm."]
def normGroupNorm : GroupNorm E :=
{ normGroupSeminorm _ with eq_one_of_map_eq_zero' := fun _ => norm_eq_zero'.1 }
@[simp]
theorem coe_normGroupNorm : ⇑(normGroupNorm E) = norm :=
rfl
end NormedGroup
section NormedAddGroup
variable [NormedAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → E}
/-! Some relations with `HasCompactSupport` -/
theorem hasCompactSupport_norm_iff : (HasCompactSupport fun x => ‖f x‖) ↔ HasCompactSupport f :=
hasCompactSupport_comp_left norm_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, HasCompactSupport.norm⟩ := hasCompactSupport_norm_iff
end NormedAddGroup
lemma tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop : Tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) atTop atTop := tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
/-! ### `positivity` extensions -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are always nonnegative, and positive
on non-one inputs. -/
@[positivity ‖_‖]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $E $_n $a) =>
let _seminormedGroup_E ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $E)
assertInstancesCommute
-- Check whether we are in a normed group and whether the context contains a `a ≠ 1` assumption
let o : Option (Q(NormedGroup $E) × Q($a ≠ 1)) := ← do
let .some normedGroup_E ← trySynthInstanceQ q(NormedGroup $E) | return none
let some pa ← findLocalDeclWithTypeQ? q($a ≠ 1) | return none
return some (normedGroup_E, pa)
match o with
-- If so, return a proof of `0 < ‖a‖`
| some (_normedGroup_E, pa) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(norm_pos_iff'.2 $pa)
-- Else, return a proof of `0 ≤ ‖a‖`
| none => return .nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not `‖·‖`"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are always nonnegative, and positive
on non-zero inputs. -/
@[positivity ‖_‖]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $E $_n $a) =>
let _seminormedAddGroup_E ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $E)
assertInstancesCommute
-- Check whether we are in a normed group and whether the context contains a `a ≠ 0` assumption
let o : Option (Q(NormedAddGroup $E) × Q($a ≠ 0)) := ← do
let .some normedAddGroup_E ← trySynthInstanceQ q(NormedAddGroup $E) | return none
let some pa ← findLocalDeclWithTypeQ? q($a ≠ 0) | return none
return some (normedAddGroup_E, pa)
match o with
-- If so, return a proof of `0 < ‖a‖`
| some (_normedAddGroup_E, pa) =>
assertInstancesCommute
return .positive q(norm_pos_iff.2 $pa)
-- Else, return a proof of `0 ≤ ‖a‖`
| none => return .nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a)
| _, _, _ => throwError "not `‖·‖`"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,499 | 1,503 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
import Mathlib.Tactic.MkIffOfInductiveProp
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.Unbundled
/-!
# Relation closures
This file defines the reflexive, transitive, reflexive transitive and equivalence closures
of relations and proves some basic results on them.
Note that this is about unbundled relations, that is terms of types of the form `α → β → Prop`. For
the bundled version, see `Rel`.
## Definitions
* `Relation.ReflGen`: Reflexive closure. `ReflGen r` relates everything `r` related, plus for all
`a` it relates `a` with itself. So `ReflGen r a b ↔ r a b ∨ a = b`.
* `Relation.TransGen`: Transitive closure. `TransGen r` relates everything `r` related
transitively. So `TransGen r a b ↔ ∃ x₀ ... xₙ, r a x₀ ∧ r x₀ x₁ ∧ ... ∧ r xₙ b`.
* `Relation.ReflTransGen`: Reflexive transitive closure. `ReflTransGen r` relates everything
`r` related transitively, plus for all `a` it relates `a` with itself. So
`ReflTransGen r a b ↔ (∃ x₀ ... xₙ, r a x₀ ∧ r x₀ x₁ ∧ ... ∧ r xₙ b) ∨ a = b`. It is the same as
the reflexive closure of the transitive closure, or the transitive closure of the reflexive
closure. In terms of rewriting systems, this means that `a` can be rewritten to `b` in a number of
rewrites.
* `Relation.EqvGen`: Equivalence closure. `EqvGen r` relates everything `ReflTransGen r` relates,
plus for all related pairs it relates them in the opposite order.
* `Relation.Comp`: Relation composition. We provide notation `∘r`. For `r : α → β → Prop` and
`s : β → γ → Prop`, `r ∘r s`relates `a : α` and `c : γ` iff there exists `b : β` that's related to
both.
* `Relation.Map`: Image of a relation under a pair of maps. For `r : α → β → Prop`, `f : α → γ`,
`g : β → δ`, `Map r f g` is the relation `γ → δ → Prop` relating `f a` and `g b` for all `a`, `b`
related by `r`.
* `Relation.Join`: Join of a relation. For `r : α → α → Prop`, `Join r a b ↔ ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c`. In
terms of rewriting systems, this means that `a` and `b` can be rewritten to the same term.
-/
open Function
variable {α β γ δ ε ζ : Type*}
section NeImp
variable {r : α → α → Prop}
theorem IsRefl.reflexive [IsRefl α r] : Reflexive r := fun x ↦ IsRefl.refl x
/-- To show a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
it suffices to show it holds when `x ≠ y`. -/
theorem Reflexive.rel_of_ne_imp (h : Reflexive r) {x y : α} (hr : x ≠ y → r x y) : r x y := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· exact hxy ▸ h x
· exact hr hxy
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. -/
theorem Reflexive.ne_imp_iff (h : Reflexive r) {x y : α} : x ≠ y → r x y ↔ r x y :=
⟨h.rel_of_ne_imp, fun hr _ ↦ hr⟩
/-- If a reflexive relation `r : α → α → Prop` holds over `x y : α`,
then it holds whether or not `x ≠ y`. Unlike `Reflexive.ne_imp_iff`, this uses `[IsRefl α r]`. -/
theorem reflexive_ne_imp_iff [IsRefl α r] {x y : α} : x ≠ y → r x y ↔ r x y :=
IsRefl.reflexive.ne_imp_iff
protected theorem Symmetric.iff (H : Symmetric r) (x y : α) : r x y ↔ r y x :=
⟨fun h ↦ H h, fun h ↦ H h⟩
theorem Symmetric.flip_eq (h : Symmetric r) : flip r = r :=
funext₂ fun _ _ ↦ propext <| h.iff _ _
theorem Symmetric.swap_eq : Symmetric r → swap r = r :=
Symmetric.flip_eq
theorem flip_eq_iff : flip r = r ↔ Symmetric r :=
⟨fun h _ _ ↦ (congr_fun₂ h _ _).mp, Symmetric.flip_eq⟩
theorem swap_eq_iff : swap r = r ↔ Symmetric r :=
flip_eq_iff
end NeImp
section Comap
variable {r : β → β → Prop}
theorem Reflexive.comap (h : Reflexive r) (f : α → β) : Reflexive (r on f) := fun a ↦ h (f a)
theorem Symmetric.comap (h : Symmetric r) (f : α → β) : Symmetric (r on f) := fun _ _ hab ↦ h hab
theorem Transitive.comap (h : Transitive r) (f : α → β) : Transitive (r on f) :=
fun _ _ _ hab hbc ↦ h hab hbc
theorem Equivalence.comap (h : Equivalence r) (f : α → β) : Equivalence (r on f) :=
⟨fun a ↦ h.refl (f a), h.symm, h.trans⟩
end Comap
namespace Relation
section Comp
variable {r : α → β → Prop} {p : β → γ → Prop} {q : γ → δ → Prop}
/-- The composition of two relations, yielding a new relation. The result
relates a term of `α` and a term of `γ` if there is an intermediate
term of `β` related to both.
-/
def Comp (r : α → β → Prop) (p : β → γ → Prop) (a : α) (c : γ) : Prop :=
∃ b, r a b ∧ p b c
@[inherit_doc]
local infixr:80 " ∘r " => Relation.Comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq_fun (f : γ → β) : r ∘r (· = f ·) = (r · <| f ·) := by
ext x y
simp [Comp]
@[simp]
theorem comp_eq : r ∘r (· = ·) = r := comp_eq_fun ..
@[simp]
theorem fun_eq_comp (f : γ → α) : (f · = ·) ∘r r = (r <| f ·) := by
ext x y
simp [Comp]
@[simp]
theorem eq_comp : (· = ·) ∘r r = r := fun_eq_comp ..
@[simp]
theorem iff_comp {r : Prop → α → Prop} : (· ↔ ·) ∘r r = r := by
have : (· ↔ ·) = (· = ·) := by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq
rw [this, eq_comp]
@[simp]
theorem comp_iff {r : α → Prop → Prop} : r ∘r (· ↔ ·) = r := by
have : (· ↔ ·) = (· = ·) := by funext a b; exact iff_eq_eq
rw [this, comp_eq]
theorem comp_assoc : (r ∘r p) ∘r q = r ∘r p ∘r q := by
funext a d
apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, c, hbc, hcd⟩ ↦ ⟨c, ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, hcd⟩
theorem flip_comp : flip (r ∘r p) = flip p ∘r flip r := by
funext c a
apply propext
constructor
· exact fun ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩
· exact fun ⟨b, hbc, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩
end Comp
section Fibration
variable (rα : α → α → Prop) (rβ : β → β → Prop) (f : α → β)
/-- A function `f : α → β` is a fibration between the relation `rα` and `rβ` if for all
`a : α` and `b : β`, whenever `b : β` and `f a` are related by `rβ`, `b` is the image
of some `a' : α` under `f`, and `a'` and `a` are related by `rα`. -/
def Fibration :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, rβ b (f a) → ∃ a', rα a' a ∧ f a' = b
variable {rα rβ}
/-- If `f : α → β` is a fibration between relations `rα` and `rβ`, and `a : α` is
accessible under `rα`, then `f a` is accessible under `rβ`. -/
theorem _root_.Acc.of_fibration (fib : Fibration rα rβ f) {a} (ha : Acc rα a) : Acc rβ (f a) := by
induction ha with | intro a _ ih => ?_
refine Acc.intro (f a) fun b hr ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a', hr', rfl⟩ := fib hr
exact ih a' hr'
theorem _root_.Acc.of_downward_closed (dc : ∀ {a b}, rβ b (f a) → ∃ c, f c = b) (a : α)
(ha : Acc (InvImage rβ f) a) : Acc rβ (f a) :=
ha.of_fibration f fun a _ h ↦
let ⟨a', he⟩ := dc h
⟨a', by simp_all [InvImage], he⟩
end Fibration
section Map
variable {r : α → β → Prop} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {c : γ} {d : δ}
/-- The map of a relation `r` through a pair of functions pushes the
relation to the codomains of the functions. The resulting relation is
defined by having pairs of terms related if they have preimages
related by `r`.
-/
protected def Map (r : α → β → Prop) (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : γ → δ → Prop := fun c d ↦
∃ a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d
lemma map_apply : Relation.Map r f g c d ↔ ∃ a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_map (r : α → β → Prop) (f₁ : α → γ) (g₁ : β → δ) (f₂ : γ → ε) (g₂ : δ → ζ) :
Relation.Map (Relation.Map r f₁ g₁) f₂ g₂ = Relation.Map r (f₂ ∘ f₁) (g₂ ∘ g₁) := by
ext a b
simp_rw [Relation.Map, Function.comp_apply, ← exists_and_right, @exists_comm γ, @exists_comm δ]
refine exists₂_congr fun a b ↦ ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ⟨_, _, ⟨⟨h.1, rfl, rfl⟩, h.2⟩⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨hab, rfl, rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨hab, h⟩
@[simp]
lemma map_apply_apply (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g) (r : α → β → Prop) (a : α) (b : β) :
Relation.Map r f g (f a) (g b) ↔ r a b := by simp [Relation.Map, hf.eq_iff, hg.eq_iff]
@[simp] lemma map_id_id (r : α → β → Prop) : Relation.Map r id id = r := by ext; simp [Relation.Map]
instance [Decidable (∃ a b, r a b ∧ f a = c ∧ g b = d)] : Decidable (Relation.Map r f g c d) :=
‹Decidable _›
lemma map_reflexive {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Reflexive r) {f : α → β} (hf : f.Surjective) :
Reflexive (Relation.Map r f f) := by
intro x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, y, hr y, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_symmetric {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Symmetric r) (f : α → β) :
Symmetric (Relation.Map r f f) := by
rintro _ _ ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl, rfl⟩; exact ⟨_, _, hr hxy, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_transitive {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Transitive r) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y → r x y) :
Transitive (Relation.Map r f f) := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl, rfl⟩ ⟨y', z, hyz, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, z, hr hxy <| hr (hf _ _ hy.symm) hyz, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_equivalence {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : Equivalence r) (f : α → β)
(hf : f.Surjective) (hf_ker : ∀ x y, f x = f y → r x y) :
Equivalence (Relation.Map r f f) where
refl := map_reflexive hr.reflexive hf
symm := @(map_symmetric hr.symmetric _)
trans := @(map_transitive hr.transitive hf_ker)
-- TODO: state this using `≤`, after adjusting imports.
lemma map_mono {r s : α → β → Prop} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} (h : ∀ x y, r x y → s x y) :
∀ x y, Relation.Map r f g x y → Relation.Map s f g x y :=
fun _ _ ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ => ⟨x, y, h _ _ hxy, hx, hy⟩
end Map
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {a b c : α}
/-- `ReflTransGen r`: reflexive transitive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff ReflTransGen.cases_tail_iff]
inductive ReflTransGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : ReflTransGen r a a
| tail {b c} : ReflTransGen r a b → r b c → ReflTransGen r a c
attribute [refl] ReflTransGen.refl
/-- `ReflGen r`: reflexive closure of `r` -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive ReflGen (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : α → Prop
| refl : ReflGen r a a
| single {b} : r a b → ReflGen r a b
variable (r) in
/-- `EqvGen r`: equivalence closure of `r`. -/
@[mk_iff]
inductive EqvGen : α → α → Prop
| rel x y : r x y → EqvGen x y
| refl x : EqvGen x x
| symm x y : EqvGen x y → EqvGen y x
| trans x y z : EqvGen x y → EqvGen y z → EqvGen x z
attribute [mk_iff] TransGen
attribute [refl] ReflGen.refl
namespace ReflGen
theorem to_reflTransGen : ∀ {a b}, ReflGen r a b → ReflTransGen r a b
| a, _, refl => by rfl
| _, _, single h => ReflTransGen.tail ReflTransGen.refl h
theorem mono {p : α → α → Prop} (hp : ∀ a b, r a b → p a b) : ∀ {a b}, ReflGen r a b → ReflGen p a b
| a, _, ReflGen.refl => by rfl
| a, b, single h => single (hp a b h)
instance : IsRefl α (ReflGen r) :=
⟨@refl α r⟩
end ReflGen
namespace ReflTransGen
@[trans]
theorem trans (hab : ReflTransGen r a b) (hbc : ReflTransGen r b c) : ReflTransGen r a c := by
induction hbc with
| refl => assumption
| tail _ hcd hac => exact hac.tail hcd
theorem single (hab : r a b) : ReflTransGen r a b :=
refl.tail hab
theorem head (hab : r a b) (hbc : ReflTransGen r b c) : ReflTransGen r a c := by
induction hbc with
| refl => exact refl.tail hab
| tail _ hcd hac => exact hac.tail hcd
theorem symmetric (h : Symmetric r) : Symmetric (ReflTransGen r) := by
intro x y h
induction h with
| refl => rfl
| tail _ b c => apply Relation.ReflTransGen.head (h b) c
theorem cases_tail : ReflTransGen r a b → b = a ∨ ∃ c, ReflTransGen r a c ∧ r c b :=
(cases_tail_iff r a b).1
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem head_induction_on {P : ∀ a : α, ReflTransGen r a b → Prop} {a : α} (h : ReflTransGen r a b)
(refl : P b refl)
(head : ∀ {a c} (h' : r a c) (h : ReflTransGen r c b), P c h → P a (h.head h')) : P a h := by
induction h with
| refl => exact refl
| @tail b c _ hbc ih =>
apply ih
· exact head hbc _ refl
· exact fun h1 h2 ↦ head h1 (h2.tail hbc)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem trans_induction_on {P : ∀ {a b : α}, ReflTransGen r a b → Prop} {a b : α}
(h : ReflTransGen r a b) (ih₁ : ∀ a, @P a a refl) (ih₂ : ∀ {a b} (h : r a b), P (single h))
(ih₃ : ∀ {a b c} (h₁ : ReflTransGen r a b) (h₂ : ReflTransGen r b c), P h₁ → P h₂ →
P (h₁.trans h₂)) : P h := by
induction h with
| refl => exact ih₁ a
| tail hab hbc ih => exact ih₃ hab (single hbc) ih (ih₂ hbc)
theorem cases_head (h : ReflTransGen r a b) : a = b ∨ ∃ c, r a c ∧ ReflTransGen r c b := by
induction h using Relation.ReflTransGen.head_induction_on
· left
rfl
· right
exact ⟨_, by assumption, by assumption⟩
theorem cases_head_iff : ReflTransGen r a b ↔ a = b ∨ ∃ c, r a c ∧ ReflTransGen r c b := by
use cases_head
rintro (rfl | ⟨c, hac, hcb⟩)
· rfl
· exact head hac hcb
theorem total_of_right_unique (U : Relator.RightUnique r) (ab : ReflTransGen r a b)
(ac : ReflTransGen r a c) : ReflTransGen r b c ∨ ReflTransGen r c b := by
induction ab with
| refl => exact Or.inl ac
| tail _ bd IH =>
rcases IH with (IH | IH)
· rcases cases_head IH with (rfl | ⟨e, be, ec⟩)
· exact Or.inr (single bd)
· cases U bd be
exact Or.inl ec
· exact Or.inr (IH.tail bd)
end ReflTransGen
namespace TransGen
theorem to_reflTransGen {a b} (h : TransGen r a b) : ReflTransGen r a b := by
induction h with
| single h => exact ReflTransGen.single h
| tail _ bc ab => exact ReflTransGen.tail ab bc
theorem trans_left (hab : TransGen r a b) (hbc : ReflTransGen r b c) : TransGen r a c := by
induction hbc with
| refl => assumption
| tail _ hcd hac => exact hac.tail hcd
instance : Trans (TransGen r) (ReflTransGen r) (TransGen r) :=
⟨trans_left⟩
attribute [trans] trans
instance : Trans (TransGen r) (TransGen r) (TransGen r) :=
⟨trans⟩
theorem head' (hab : r a b) (hbc : ReflTransGen r b c) : TransGen r a c :=
trans_left (single hab) hbc
theorem tail' (hab : ReflTransGen r a b) (hbc : r b c) : TransGen r a c := by
induction hab generalizing c with
| refl => exact single hbc
| tail _ hdb IH => exact tail (IH hdb) hbc
theorem head (hab : r a b) (hbc : TransGen r b c) : TransGen r a c :=
head' hab hbc.to_reflTransGen
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem head_induction_on {P : ∀ a : α, TransGen r a b → Prop} {a : α} (h : TransGen r a b)
(base : ∀ {a} (h : r a b), P a (single h))
(ih : ∀ {a c} (h' : r a c) (h : TransGen r c b), P c h → P a (h.head h')) : P a h := by
induction h with
| single h => exact base h
| @tail b c _ hbc h_ih =>
apply h_ih
· exact fun h ↦ ih h (single hbc) (base hbc)
· exact fun hab hbc ↦ ih hab _
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem trans_induction_on {P : ∀ {a b : α}, TransGen r a b → Prop} {a b : α} (h : TransGen r a b)
(base : ∀ {a b} (h : r a b), P (single h))
(ih : ∀ {a b c} (h₁ : TransGen r a b) (h₂ : TransGen r b c), P h₁ → P h₂ → P (h₁.trans h₂)) :
P h := by
induction h with
| single h => exact base h
| tail hab hbc h_ih => exact ih hab (single hbc) h_ih (base hbc)
theorem trans_right (hab : ReflTransGen r a b) (hbc : TransGen r b c) : TransGen r a c := by
induction hbc with
| single hbc => exact tail' hab hbc
| tail _ hcd hac => exact hac.tail hcd
instance : Trans (ReflTransGen r) (TransGen r) (TransGen r) :=
⟨trans_right⟩
theorem tail'_iff : TransGen r a c ↔ ∃ b, ReflTransGen r a b ∧ r b c := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩ ↦ tail' hab hbc⟩
cases h with
| single hac => exact ⟨_, by rfl, hac⟩
| tail hab hbc => exact ⟨_, hab.to_reflTransGen, hbc⟩
theorem head'_iff : TransGen r a c ↔ ∃ b, r a b ∧ ReflTransGen r b c := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩ ↦ head' hab hbc⟩
induction h with
| single hac => exact ⟨_, hac, by rfl⟩
| tail _ hbc IH =>
rcases IH with ⟨d, had, hdb⟩
exact ⟨_, had, hdb.tail hbc⟩
end TransGen
section reflGen
lemma reflGen_eq_self (hr : Reflexive r) : ReflGen r = r := by
ext x y
simpa only [reflGen_iff, or_iff_right_iff_imp] using fun h ↦ h ▸ hr y
lemma reflexive_reflGen : Reflexive (ReflGen r) := fun _ ↦ .refl
lemma reflGen_minimal {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr' : Reflexive r') (h : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y) {x y : α}
(hxy : ReflGen r x y) : r' x y := by
simpa [reflGen_eq_self hr'] using ReflGen.mono h hxy
end reflGen
section TransGen
theorem transGen_eq_self (trans : Transitive r) : TransGen r = r :=
funext fun a ↦ funext fun b ↦ propext <|
⟨fun h ↦ by
induction h with
| single hc => exact hc
| tail _ hcd hac => exact trans hac hcd, TransGen.single⟩
theorem transitive_transGen : Transitive (TransGen r) := fun _ _ _ ↦ TransGen.trans
instance : IsTrans α (TransGen r) :=
⟨@TransGen.trans α r⟩
theorem transGen_idem : TransGen (TransGen r) = TransGen r :=
transGen_eq_self transitive_transGen
theorem TransGen.lift {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ a b, r a b → p (f a) (f b))
(hab : TransGen r a b) : TransGen p (f a) (f b) := by
induction hab with
| single hac => exact TransGen.single (h a _ hac)
| tail _ hcd hac => exact TransGen.tail hac (h _ _ hcd)
theorem TransGen.lift' {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → TransGen p (f a) (f b)) (hab : TransGen r a b) :
TransGen p (f a) (f b) := by
simpa [transGen_idem] using hab.lift f h
theorem TransGen.closed {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a b, r a b → TransGen p a b) → TransGen r a b → TransGen p a b :=
TransGen.lift' id
lemma TransGen.closed' {P : α → Prop} (dc : ∀ {a b}, r a b → P b → P a)
{a b : α} (h : TransGen r a b) : P b → P a :=
h.head_induction_on dc fun hr _ hi ↦ dc hr ∘ hi
theorem TransGen.mono {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a b, r a b → p a b) → TransGen r a b → TransGen p a b :=
TransGen.lift id
lemma transGen_minimal {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr' : Transitive r') (h : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y)
{x y : α} (hxy : TransGen r x y) : r' x y := by
simpa [transGen_eq_self hr'] using TransGen.mono h hxy
theorem TransGen.swap (h : TransGen r b a) : TransGen (swap r) a b := by
induction h with
| single h => exact TransGen.single h
| tail _ hbc ih => exact ih.head hbc
theorem transGen_swap : TransGen (swap r) a b ↔ TransGen r b a :=
⟨TransGen.swap, TransGen.swap⟩
end TransGen
section ReflTransGen
open ReflTransGen
theorem reflTransGen_iff_eq (h : ∀ b, ¬r a b) : ReflTransGen r a b ↔ b = a := by
rw [cases_head_iff]; simp [h, eq_comm]
theorem reflTransGen_iff_eq_or_transGen : ReflTransGen r a b ↔ b = a ∨ TransGen r a b := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· cases h with
| refl => exact Or.inl rfl
| tail hac hcb => exact Or.inr (TransGen.tail' hac hcb)
· rcases h with (rfl | h)
· rfl
· exact h.to_reflTransGen
theorem ReflTransGen.lift {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → p (f a) (f b)) (hab : ReflTransGen r a b) : ReflTransGen p (f a) (f b) :=
ReflTransGen.trans_induction_on hab (fun _ ↦ refl) (ReflTransGen.single ∘ h _ _) fun _ _ ↦ trans
theorem ReflTransGen.mono {p : α → α → Prop} : (∀ a b, r a b → p a b) →
ReflTransGen r a b → ReflTransGen p a b :=
ReflTransGen.lift id
theorem reflTransGen_eq_self (refl : Reflexive r) (trans : Transitive r) : ReflTransGen r = r :=
funext fun a ↦ funext fun b ↦ propext <|
⟨fun h ↦ by
induction h with
| refl => apply refl
| tail _ h₂ IH => exact trans IH h₂, single⟩
lemma reflTransGen_minimal {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr₁ : Reflexive r') (hr₂ : Transitive r')
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y) {x y : α} (hxy : ReflTransGen r x y) : r' x y := by
simpa [reflTransGen_eq_self hr₁ hr₂] using ReflTransGen.mono h hxy
theorem reflexive_reflTransGen : Reflexive (ReflTransGen r) := fun _ ↦ refl
theorem transitive_reflTransGen : Transitive (ReflTransGen r) := fun _ _ _ ↦ trans
instance : IsRefl α (ReflTransGen r) :=
⟨@ReflTransGen.refl α r⟩
instance : IsTrans α (ReflTransGen r) :=
⟨@ReflTransGen.trans α r⟩
theorem reflTransGen_idem : ReflTransGen (ReflTransGen r) = ReflTransGen r :=
reflTransGen_eq_self reflexive_reflTransGen transitive_reflTransGen
theorem ReflTransGen.lift' {p : β → β → Prop} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ a b, r a b → ReflTransGen p (f a) (f b))
(hab : ReflTransGen r a b) : ReflTransGen p (f a) (f b) := by
simpa [reflTransGen_idem] using hab.lift f h
theorem reflTransGen_closed {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a b, r a b → ReflTransGen p a b) → ReflTransGen r a b → ReflTransGen p a b :=
ReflTransGen.lift' id
theorem ReflTransGen.swap (h : ReflTransGen r b a) : ReflTransGen (swap r) a b := by
induction h with
| refl => rfl
| tail _ hbc ih => exact ih.head hbc
theorem reflTransGen_swap : ReflTransGen (swap r) a b ↔ ReflTransGen r b a :=
⟨ReflTransGen.swap, ReflTransGen.swap⟩
@[simp] lemma reflGen_transGen : ReflGen (TransGen r) = ReflTransGen r := by
ext x y
simp_rw [reflTransGen_iff_eq_or_transGen, reflGen_iff]
@[simp] lemma transGen_reflGen : TransGen (ReflGen r) = ReflTransGen r := by
| ext x y
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· simpa [reflTransGen_idem]
using TransGen.to_reflTransGen <| TransGen.mono (fun _ _ ↦ ReflGen.to_reflTransGen) h
· obtain (rfl | h) := reflTransGen_iff_eq_or_transGen.mp h
· exact .single .refl
| Mathlib/Logic/Relation.lean | 583 | 588 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Option.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Computation
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `Seq α` type representing possibly infinite lists (referred here as sequences).
It is encoded as an infinite stream of options such that if `f n = none`, then
`f m = none` for all `m ≥ n`.
-/
namespace Stream'
universe u v w
/-
coinductive seq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : seq α
| cons : α → seq α → seq α
-/
/-- A stream `s : Option α` is a sequence if `s.get n = none` implies `s.get (n + 1) = none`.
-/
def IsSeq {α : Type u} (s : Stream' (Option α)) : Prop :=
∀ {n : ℕ}, s n = none → s (n + 1) = none
/-- `Seq α` is the type of possibly infinite lists (referred here as sequences).
It is encoded as an infinite stream of options such that if `f n = none`, then
`f m = none` for all `m ≥ n`. -/
def Seq (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : Stream' (Option α) // f.IsSeq }
/-- `Seq1 α` is the type of nonempty sequences. -/
def Seq1 (α) :=
α × Seq α
namespace Seq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- The empty sequence -/
def nil : Seq α :=
⟨Stream'.const none, fun {_} _ => rfl⟩
instance : Inhabited (Seq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- Prepend an element to a sequence -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Seq α) : Seq α :=
⟨some a::s.1, by
rintro (n | _) h
· contradiction
· exact s.2 h⟩
@[simp]
theorem val_cons (s : Seq α) (x : α) : (cons x s).val = some x::s.val :=
rfl
/-- Get the nth element of a sequence (if it exists) -/
def get? : Seq α → ℕ → Option α :=
Subtype.val
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_get (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : s.val n = s.get? n := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_mk (f hf) : @get? α ⟨f, hf⟩ = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_nil (n : ℕ) : (@nil α).get? n = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_cons_zero (a : α) (s : Seq α) : (cons a s).get? 0 = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_cons_succ (a : α) (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : (cons a s).get? (n + 1) = s.get? n :=
rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s t : Seq α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, s.get? n = t.get? n) : s = t :=
Subtype.eq <| funext h
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Seq α → Seq α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← Option.some_inj, ← get?_cons_zero, h, get?_cons_zero],
Seq.ext fun n => by simp_rw [← get?_cons_succ x s n, h, get?_cons_succ]⟩
theorem cons_left_injective (s : Seq α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_right_injective (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
/-- A sequence has terminated at position `n` if the value at position `n` equals `none`. -/
def TerminatedAt (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
s.get? n = none
/-- It is decidable whether a sequence terminates at a given position. -/
instance terminatedAtDecidable (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : Decidable (s.TerminatedAt n) :=
decidable_of_iff' (s.get? n).isNone <| by unfold TerminatedAt; cases s.get? n <;> simp
/-- A sequence terminates if there is some position `n` at which it has terminated. -/
def Terminates (s : Seq α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, s.TerminatedAt n
theorem not_terminates_iff {s : Seq α} : ¬s.Terminates ↔ ∀ n, (s.get? n).isSome := by
simp only [Terminates, TerminatedAt, ← Ne.eq_def, Option.ne_none_iff_isSome, not_exists, iff_self]
/-- Functorial action of the functor `Option (α × _)` -/
@[simp]
def omap (f : β → γ) : Option (α × β) → Option (α × γ)
| none => none
| some (a, b) => some (a, f b)
/-- Get the first element of a sequence -/
def head (s : Seq α) : Option α :=
get? s 0
/-- Get the tail of a sequence (or `nil` if the sequence is `nil`) -/
def tail (s : Seq α) : Seq α :=
⟨s.1.tail, fun n' => by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
exact al n'⟩
/-- member definition for `Seq` -/
protected def Mem (s : Seq α) (a : α) :=
some a ∈ s.1
instance : Membership α (Seq α) :=
⟨Seq.Mem⟩
theorem le_stable (s : Seq α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : s.get? m = none → s.get? n = none := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
induction' h with n _ IH
exacts [id, fun h2 => al (IH h2)]
/-- If a sequence terminated at position `n`, it also terminated at `m ≥ n`. -/
theorem terminated_stable : ∀ (s : Seq α) {m n : ℕ}, m ≤ n → s.TerminatedAt m → s.TerminatedAt n :=
le_stable
/-- If `s.get? n = some aₙ` for some value `aₙ`, then there is also some value `aₘ` such
that `s.get? = some aₘ` for `m ≤ n`.
-/
theorem ge_stable (s : Seq α) {aₙ : α} {n m : ℕ} (m_le_n : m ≤ n)
(s_nth_eq_some : s.get? n = some aₙ) : ∃ aₘ : α, s.get? m = some aₘ :=
have : s.get? n ≠ none := by simp [s_nth_eq_some]
have : s.get? m ≠ none := mt (s.le_stable m_le_n) this
Option.ne_none_iff_exists'.mp this
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α := fun ⟨_, (h : some a = none)⟩ => by injection h
theorem mem_cons (a : α) : ∀ s : Seq α, a ∈ cons a s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Stream'.mem_cons (some a) _
theorem mem_cons_of_mem (y : α) {a : α} : ∀ {s : Seq α}, a ∈ s → a ∈ cons y s
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem (some y)
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} : ∀ {s : Seq α}, a ∈ cons b s → a = b ∨ a ∈ s
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).imp_left fun h => by injection h
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff {a b : α} {s : Seq α} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
⟨eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, by rintro (rfl | m) <;> [apply mem_cons; exact mem_cons_of_mem _ m]⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_mem {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} (h : s.get? n = .some x) : x ∈ s := ⟨n, h.symm⟩
/-- Destructor for a sequence, resulting in either `none` (for `nil`) or
`some (a, s)` (for `cons a s`). -/
def destruct (s : Seq α) : Option (Seq1 α) :=
(fun a' => (a', s.tail)) <$> get? s 0
theorem destruct_eq_none {s : Seq α} : destruct s = none → s = nil := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : get? s 0 <;> intro h
· apply Subtype.eq
funext n
induction' n with n IH
exacts [f0, s.2 IH]
· contradiction
theorem destruct_eq_cons {s : Seq α} {a s'} : destruct s = some (a, s') → s = cons a s' := by
dsimp [destruct]
induction' f0 : get? s 0 with a' <;> intro h
· contradiction
· obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
injections _ h1 h2
rw [← h2]
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [tail, cons]
rw [h1] at f0
rw [← f0]
exact (Stream'.eta f).symm
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : Seq α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) : ∀ s, destruct (cons a s) = some (a, s)
| ⟨f, al⟩ => by
unfold cons destruct Functor.map
apply congr_arg fun s => some (a, s)
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail]
-- Porting note: needed universe annotation to avoid universe issues
theorem head_eq_destruct (s : Seq α) : head.{u} s = Prod.fst.{u} <$> destruct.{u} s := by
unfold destruct head; cases get? s 0 <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : Seq α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = some a := by
rw [head_eq_destruct, destruct_cons, Option.map_eq_map, Option.map_some']
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : Seq α) = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by
obtain ⟨f, al⟩ := s
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [tail, cons]
@[simp]
theorem get?_tail (s : Seq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
rfl
/-- Recursion principle for sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
@[cases_eliminator]
def recOn {motive : Seq α → Sort v} (s : Seq α) (nil : motive nil)
(cons : ∀ x s, motive (cons x s)) :
motive s := by
rcases H : destruct s with - | v
· rw [destruct_eq_none H]
apply nil
· obtain ⟨a, s'⟩ := v
rw [destruct_eq_cons H]
apply cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_ne_nil {x : α} {s : Seq α} : (cons x s) ≠ .nil := by
intro h
apply_fun head at h
simp at h
@[simp]
theorem nil_ne_cons {x : α} {s : Seq α} : .nil ≠ (cons x s) := cons_ne_nil.symm
theorem cons_eq_cons {x x' : α} {s s' : Seq α} :
(cons x s = cons x' s') ↔ (x = x' ∧ s = s') := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· apply_fun head at h
simpa using h
· apply_fun tail at h
simpa using h
· intro ⟨_, _⟩
congr
theorem head_eq_some {s : Seq α} {x : α} (h : s.head = some x) :
s = cons x s.tail := by
cases s <;> simp at h
simpa [cons_eq_cons]
theorem head_eq_none {s : Seq α} (h : s.head = none) : s = nil := by
cases s
· rfl
· simp at h
@[simp]
theorem head_eq_none_iff {s : Seq α} : s.head = none ↔ s = nil := by
constructor
· apply head_eq_none
· intro h
simp [h]
theorem mem_rec_on {C : Seq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s)
(h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s')) : C s := by
obtain ⟨k, e⟩ := M; unfold Stream'.get at e
induction' k with k IH generalizing s
· have TH : s = cons a (tail s) := by
apply destruct_eq_cons
unfold destruct get? Functor.map
rw [← e]
rfl
rw [TH]
apply h1 _ _ (Or.inl rfl)
cases s with
| nil => injection e
| cons b s' =>
have h_eq : (cons b s').val (Nat.succ k) = s'.val k := by cases s' using Subtype.recOn; rfl
rw [h_eq] at e
apply h1 _ _ (Or.inr (IH e))
/-- Corecursor over pairs of `Option` values -/
def Corec.f (f : β → Option (α × β)) : Option β → Option α × Option β
| none => (none, none)
| some b =>
match f b with
| none => (none, none)
| some (a, b') => (some a, some b')
/-- Corecursor for `Seq α` as a coinductive type. Iterates `f` to produce new elements
of the sequence until `none` is obtained. -/
def corec (f : β → Option (α × β)) (b : β) : Seq α := by
refine ⟨Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (some b), fun {n} h => ?_⟩
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq]
change Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f (some b)).2 n = none
revert h; generalize some b = o; revert o
induction' n with n IH <;> intro o
· change (Corec.f f o).1 = none → (Corec.f f (Corec.f f o).2).1 = none
rcases o with - | b <;> intro h
· rfl
dsimp [Corec.f] at h
dsimp [Corec.f]
revert h; rcases h₁ : f b with - | s <;> intro h
· rfl
· obtain ⟨a, b'⟩ := s
contradiction
· rw [Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) (Corec.f f o).2, Stream'.corec'_eq (Corec.f f) o]
exact IH (Corec.f f o).2
@[simp]
theorem corec_eq (f : β → Option (α × β)) (b : β) :
destruct (corec f b) = omap (corec f) (f b) := by
dsimp [corec, destruct, get]
rw [show Stream'.corec' (Corec.f f) (some b) 0 = (Corec.f f (some b)).1 from rfl]
dsimp [Corec.f]
induction' h : f b with s; · rfl
obtain ⟨a, b'⟩ := s; dsimp [Corec.f]
apply congr_arg fun b' => some (a, b')
apply Subtype.eq
dsimp [corec, tail]
rw [Stream'.corec'_eq, Stream'.tail_cons]
dsimp [Corec.f]; rw [h]
theorem corec_nil (f : β → Option (α × β)) (b : β)
(h : f b = .none) : corec f b = nil := by
apply destruct_eq_none
simp [h]
theorem corec_cons {f : β → Option (α × β)} {b : β} {x : α} {s : β}
(h : f b = .some (x, s)) : corec f b = cons x (corec f s) := by
apply destruct_eq_cons
simp [h]
section Bisim
variable (R : Seq α → Seq α → Prop)
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Bisimilarity relation over `Option` of `Seq1 α` -/
def BisimO : Option (Seq1 α) → Option (Seq1 α) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (a', s') => a = a' ∧ R s s'
| _, _ => False
attribute [simp] BisimO
attribute [nolint simpNF] BisimO.eq_3
/-- a relation is bisimilar if it meets the `BisimO` test -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ → BisimO R (destruct s₁) (destruct s₂)
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) {s₁ s₂} (r : s₁ ~ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ := by
apply Subtype.eq
apply Stream'.eq_of_bisim fun x y => ∃ s s' : Seq α, s.1 = x ∧ s'.1 = y ∧ R s s'
· dsimp [Stream'.IsBisimulation]
intro t₁ t₂ e
exact
match t₁, t₂, e with
| _, _, ⟨s, s', rfl, rfl, r⟩ => by
suffices head s = head s' ∧ R (tail s) (tail s') from
And.imp id (fun r => ⟨tail s, tail s', by cases s using Subtype.recOn; rfl,
by cases s' using Subtype.recOn; rfl, r⟩) this
have := bisim r; revert r this
cases s <;> cases s'
· intro r _
constructor
· rfl
· assumption
· intro _ this
rw [destruct_nil, destruct_cons] at this
exact False.elim this
· intro _ this
rw [destruct_nil, destruct_cons] at this
exact False.elim this
· intro _ this
rw [destruct_cons, destruct_cons] at this
rw [head_cons, head_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := this
constructor
· rw [h1]
· exact h2
· exact ⟨s₁, s₂, rfl, rfl, r⟩
end Bisim
theorem coinduction :
∀ {s₁ s₂ : Seq α},
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Seq α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂
| _, _, hh, ht =>
Subtype.eq (Stream'.coinduction hh fun β fr => ht β fun s => fr s.1)
theorem coinduction2 (s) (f g : Seq α → Seq β)
(H :
∀ s,
BisimO (fun s1 s2 : Seq β => ∃ s : Seq α, s1 = f s ∧ s2 = g s) (destruct (f s))
(destruct (g s))) :
f s = g s := by
refine eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => ∃ s, s1 = f s ∧ s2 = g s) ?_ ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨s, h1, h2⟩
rw [h1, h2]; apply H
/-- Embed a list as a sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : Seq α :=
⟨(l[·]?), fun {n} h => by
rw [List.getElem?_eq_none_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.trans (Nat.le_succ n)⟩
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (Seq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList [] = (nil : Seq α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofList_get? (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (ofList l).get? n = l[n]? :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias ofList_get := ofList_get?
@[simp]
theorem ofList_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : ofList (a::l) = cons a (ofList l) := by
ext1 (_ | n) <;> simp
theorem ofList_injective : Function.Injective (ofList : List α → _) :=
fun _ _ h => List.ext_getElem? fun _ => congr_fun (Subtype.ext_iff.1 h) _
/-- Embed an infinite stream as a sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (s : Stream' α) : Seq α :=
⟨s.map some, fun {n} h => by contradiction⟩
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (Seq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
section MLList
/-- Embed a `MLList α` as a sequence. Note that even though this
is non-meta, it will produce infinite sequences if used with
cyclic `MLList`s created by meta constructions. -/
def ofMLList : MLList Id α → Seq α :=
corec fun l =>
match l.uncons with
| .none => none
| .some (a, l') => some (a, l')
instance coeMLList : Coe (MLList Id α) (Seq α) :=
⟨ofMLList⟩
/-- Translate a sequence into a `MLList`. -/
unsafe def toMLList : Seq α → MLList Id α
| s =>
match destruct s with
| none => .nil
| some (a, s') => .cons a (toMLList s')
end MLList
/-- Translate a sequence to a list. This function will run forever if
run on an infinite sequence. -/
unsafe def forceToList (s : Seq α) : List α :=
(toMLList s).force
/-- The sequence of natural numbers some 0, some 1, ... -/
def nats : Seq ℕ :=
Stream'.nats
@[simp]
theorem nats_get? (n : ℕ) : nats.get? n = some n :=
rfl
/-- Append two sequences. If `s₁` is infinite, then `s₁ ++ s₂ = s₁`,
otherwise it puts `s₂` at the location of the `nil` in `s₁`. -/
def append (s₁ s₂ : Seq α) : Seq α :=
@corec α (Seq α × Seq α)
(fun ⟨s₁, s₂⟩ =>
match destruct s₁ with
| none => omap (fun s₂ => (nil, s₂)) (destruct s₂)
| some (a, s₁') => some (a, s₁', s₂))
(s₁, s₂)
/-- Map a function over a sequence. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Seq α → Seq β
| ⟨s, al⟩ =>
⟨s.map (Option.map f), fun {n} => by
dsimp [Stream'.map, Stream'.get]
induction' e : s n with e <;> intro
· rw [al e]
assumption
· contradiction⟩
/-- Flatten a sequence of sequences. (It is required that the
sequences be nonempty to ensure productivity; in the case
of an infinite sequence of `nil`, the first element is never
generated.) -/
def join : Seq (Seq1 α) → Seq α :=
corec fun S =>
match destruct S with
| none => none
| some ((a, s), S') =>
some
(a,
match destruct s with
| none => S'
| some s' => cons s' S')
/-- Remove the first `n` elements from the sequence. -/
def drop (s : Seq α) : ℕ → Seq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
/-- Take the first `n` elements of the sequence (producing a list) -/
def take : ℕ → Seq α → List α
| 0, _ => []
| n + 1, s =>
match destruct s with
| none => []
| some (x, r) => List.cons x (take n r)
/-- Split a sequence at `n`, producing a finite initial segment
and an infinite tail. -/
def splitAt : ℕ → Seq α → List α × Seq α
| 0, s => ([], s)
| n + 1, s =>
match destruct s with
| none => ([], nil)
| some (x, s') =>
let (l, r) := splitAt n s'
(List.cons x l, r)
/-- Folds a sequence using `f`, producing a sequence of intermediate values, i.e.
`[init, f init s.head, f (f init s.head) s.tail.head, ...]`. -/
def fold (s : Seq α) (init : β) (f : β → α → β) : Seq β :=
let f : β × Seq α → Option (β × (β × Seq α)) := fun (acc, x) =>
match destruct x with
| none => .none
| some (x, s) => .some (f acc x, f acc x, s)
cons init <| corec f (init, s)
section ZipWith
/-- Combine two sequences with a function -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s₁ : Seq α) (s₂ : Seq β) : Seq γ :=
⟨fun n => Option.map₂ f (s₁.get? n) (s₂.get? n), fun {_} hn =>
Option.map₂_eq_none_iff.2 <| (Option.map₂_eq_none_iff.1 hn).imp s₁.2 s₂.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s s' n) :
(zipWith f s s').get? n = Option.map₂ f (s.get? n) (s'.get? n) :=
rfl
end ZipWith
/-- Pair two sequences into a sequence of pairs -/
def zip : Seq α → Seq β → Seq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
@[simp]
theorem get?_zip (s : Seq α) (t : Seq β) (n : ℕ) :
get? (zip s t) n = Option.map₂ Prod.mk (get? s n) (get? t n) :=
get?_zipWith _ _ _ _
/-- Separate a sequence of pairs into two sequences -/
def unzip (s : Seq (α × β)) : Seq α × Seq β :=
(map Prod.fst s, map Prod.snd s)
/-- Enumerate a sequence by tagging each element with its index. -/
def enum (s : Seq α) : Seq (ℕ × α) :=
Seq.zip nats s
@[simp]
theorem get?_enum (s : Seq α) (n : ℕ) : get? (enum s) n = Option.map (Prod.mk n) (get? s n) :=
get?_zip _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem enum_nil : enum (nil : Seq α) = nil :=
rfl
/-- The length of a terminating sequence. -/
def length (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) : ℕ :=
Nat.find h
/-- Convert a sequence which is known to terminate into a list -/
def toList (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) : List α :=
take (length s h) s
/-- Convert a sequence which is known not to terminate into a stream -/
def toStream (s : Seq α) (h : ¬s.Terminates) : Stream' α := fun n =>
Option.get _ <| not_terminates_iff.1 h n
/-- Convert a sequence into either a list or a stream depending on whether
it is finite or infinite. (Without decidability of the infiniteness predicate,
this is not constructively possible.) -/
def toListOrStream (s : Seq α) [Decidable s.Terminates] : List α ⊕ Stream' α :=
if h : s.Terminates then Sum.inl (toList s h) else Sum.inr (toStream s h)
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : Seq α) : append nil s = s := by
apply coinduction2; intro s
dsimp [append]; rw [corec_eq]
dsimp [append]
cases s
· trivial
· rw [destruct_cons]
dsimp
exact ⟨rfl, _, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem take_nil {n : ℕ} : (nil (α := α)).take n = List.nil := by
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem take_zero {s : Seq α} : s.take 0 = [] := by
cases s <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem take_succ_cons {n : ℕ} {x : α} {s : Seq α} :
(cons x s).take (n + 1) = x :: s.take n := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_take : ∀ (n k : ℕ) (s : Seq α),
(s.take k)[n]? = if n < k then s.get? n else none
| n, 0, s => by simp [take]
| n, k+1, s => by
rw [take]
cases h : destruct s with
| none =>
simp [destruct_eq_none h]
| some a =>
match a with
| (x, r) =>
rw [destruct_eq_cons h]
match n with
| 0 => simp
| n+1 =>
simp [List.getElem?_cons_succ, Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right, getElem?_take]
theorem get?_mem_take {s : Seq α} {m n : ℕ} (h_mn : m < n) {x : α}
(h_get : s.get? m = .some x) : x ∈ s.take n := by
induction m generalizing n s with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := Nat.exists_add_one_eq.mpr h_mn
rw [← hl, take, head_eq_some h_get]
simp
| succ k ih =>
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt h_mn
subst hl
have : ∃ y, s.get? 0 = .some y := by
apply ge_stable _ _ h_get
simp
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := this
rw [take, head_eq_some hy]
simp
right
apply ih (by omega)
rwa [get?_tail]
theorem terminatedAt_ofList (l : List α) :
(ofList l).TerminatedAt l.length := by
simp [ofList, TerminatedAt]
theorem terminates_ofList (l : List α) : (ofList l).Terminates :=
⟨_, terminatedAt_ofList l⟩
@[simp]
theorem terminatedAt_nil {n : ℕ} : TerminatedAt (nil : Seq α) n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_not_terminatedAt_zero {x : α} {s : Seq α} :
¬(cons x s).TerminatedAt 0 := by
simp [TerminatedAt]
@[simp]
theorem cons_terminatedAt_succ_iff {x : α} {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} :
(cons x s).TerminatedAt (n + 1) ↔ s.TerminatedAt n := by
simp [TerminatedAt]
@[simp]
theorem terminates_nil : Terminates (nil : Seq α) := ⟨0, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem terminates_cons_iff {x : α} {s : Seq α} :
(cons x s).Terminates ↔ s.Terminates := by
constructor <;> intro ⟨n, h⟩
· exact ⟨n, cons_terminatedAt_succ_iff.mp (terminated_stable _ (Nat.le_succ _) h)⟩
· exact ⟨n + 1, cons_terminatedAt_succ_iff.mpr h⟩
@[simp]
theorem length_nil : length (nil : Seq α) terminates_nil = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_zero_eq_none {s : Seq α} : s.get? 0 = none ↔ s = nil := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
ext1 n
exact le_stable s (Nat.zero_le _) h
@[simp] theorem length_eq_zero {s : Seq α} {h : s.Terminates} :
s.length h = 0 ↔ s = nil := by
simp [length, TerminatedAt]
theorem terminatedAt_zero_iff {s : Seq α} : s.TerminatedAt 0 ↔ s = nil := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro h
ext n
rw [le_stable _ (Nat.zero_le _) h]
simp
· rintro rfl
simp [TerminatedAt]
/-- The statement of `length_le_iff'` does not assume that the sequence terminates. For a
simpler statement of the theorem where the sequence is known to terminate see `length_le_iff` -/
theorem length_le_iff' {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} :
(∃ h, s.length h ≤ n) ↔ s.TerminatedAt n := by
simp only [length, Nat.find_le_iff, TerminatedAt, Terminates, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨_, k, hkn, hk⟩
exact le_stable s hkn hk
· intro hn
exact ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, ⟨n, le_rfl, hn⟩⟩
/-- The statement of `length_le_iff` assumes that the sequence terminates. For a
statement of the where the sequence is not known to terminate see `length_le_iff'` -/
theorem length_le_iff {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} {h : s.Terminates} :
s.length h ≤ n ↔ s.TerminatedAt n := by
rw [← length_le_iff']; simp [h]
/-- The statement of `lt_length_iff'` does not assume that the sequence terminates. For a
simpler statement of the theorem where the sequence is known to terminate see `lt_length_iff` -/
theorem lt_length_iff' {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} :
(∀ h : s.Terminates, n < s.length h) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s.get? n := by
simp only [Terminates, TerminatedAt, length, Nat.lt_find_iff, forall_exists_index, Option.mem_def,
← Option.ne_none_iff_exists', ne_eq]
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro h hn
exact h n hn n le_rfl hn
· intro hn _ _ k hkn hk
exact hn <| le_stable s hkn hk
/-- The statement of `length_le_iff` assumes that the sequence terminates. For a
statement of the where the sequence is not known to terminate see `length_le_iff'` -/
theorem lt_length_iff {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} {h : s.Terminates} :
n < s.length h ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s.get? n := by
rw [← lt_length_iff']; simp [h]
theorem length_take_le {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} : (s.take n).length ≤ n := by
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simp
| succ m ih =>
rw [take]
cases s.destruct with
| none => simp
| some v =>
obtain ⟨x, r⟩ := v
simpa using ih
theorem length_take_of_le_length {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ}
(hle : ∀ h : s.Terminates, n ≤ s.length h) : (s.take n).length = n := by
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simp [take]
| succ n ih =>
rw [take, destruct]
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := lt_length_iff'.1 (fun ht => lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_pos _) (hle ht))
simp [Option.mem_def.1 ha]
rw [ih]
intro h
simp only [length, tail, Nat.le_find_iff, TerminatedAt, get?_mk, Stream'.tail]
intro m hmn hs
have := lt_length_iff'.1 (fun ht => (Nat.lt_of_succ_le (hle ht)))
rw [le_stable s (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hmn) hs] at this
simp at this
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) : (toList s h).length = length s h := by
rw [toList, length_take_of_le_length]
intro _
exact le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_toList (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) (n : ℕ) : (toList s h)[n]? = s.get? n := by
ext k
simp only [ofList, toList, get?_mk, Option.mem_def, getElem?_take, Nat.lt_find_iff, length,
Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, and_iff_right_iff_imp, TerminatedAt]
intro h m hmn
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := ge_stable s hmn h
simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem ofList_toList (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) :
ofList (toList s h) = s := by
ext n; simp [ofList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofList (l : List α) : toList (ofList l) (terminates_ofList l) = l :=
ofList_injective (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (nil : Seq α) ⟨0, terminatedAt_zero_iff.2 rfl⟩ = [] := by
ext; simp [nil, toList, const]
theorem getLast?_toList (s : Seq α) (h : s.Terminates) :
(toList s h).getLast? = s.get? (s.length h - 1) := by
rw [List.getLast?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_toList, length_toList]
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
destruct_eq_cons <| by
dsimp [append]; rw [corec_eq]
dsimp [append]; rw [destruct_cons]
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : Seq α) : append s nil = s := by
apply coinduction2 s; intro s
cases s
· trivial
· rw [cons_append, destruct_cons, destruct_cons]
dsimp
exact ⟨rfl, _, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : Seq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) := by
apply eq_of_bisim fun s1 s2 => ∃ s t u, s1 = append (append s t) u ∧ s2 = append s (append t u)
· intro s1 s2 h
exact
match s1, s2, h with
| _, _, ⟨s, t, u, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
cases s <;> simp
case nil =>
cases t <;> simp
case nil =>
cases u <;> simp
case cons _ u => refine ⟨nil, nil, u, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
case cons _ t => refine ⟨nil, t, u, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
case cons _ s => exact ⟨s, t, u, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨s, t, u, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_nil (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a) : ∀ s, map f (cons a s) = cons (f a) (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [cons, map]; rw [Stream'.map_cons]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : ∀ s : Seq α, map id s = s
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
rw [Option.map_id, Stream'.map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (f : α → β) : ∀ s, map f (tail s) = tail (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [tail, map]
theorem map_comp (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : ∀ s : Seq α, map (g ∘ f) s = map g (map f s)
| ⟨s, al⟩ => by
apply Subtype.eq; dsimp [map]
apply congr_arg fun f : _ → Option γ => Stream'.map f s
ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_append (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (append s t) = append (map f s) (map f t) := by
apply
eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => ∃ s t, s1 = map f (append s t) ∧ s2 = append (map f s) (map f t)) _
⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h
exact
match s1, s2, h with
| _, _, ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
cases s <;> simp
case nil =>
cases t <;> simp
case cons _ t => refine ⟨nil, t, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
case cons _ s => exact ⟨s, t, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_get? (f : α → β) : ∀ s n, get? (map f s) n = (get? s n).map f
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem terminatedAt_map_iff {f : α → β} {s : Seq α} {n : ℕ} :
(map f s).TerminatedAt n ↔ s.TerminatedAt n := by
simp [TerminatedAt]
@[simp]
theorem terminates_map_iff {f : α → β} {s : Seq α} :
(map f s).Terminates ↔ s.Terminates := by
simp [Terminates]
@[simp]
theorem length_map {s : Seq α} {f : α → β} (h : (s.map f).Terminates) :
(s.map f).length h = s.length (terminates_map_iff.1 h) := by
rw [length]
congr
ext
simp
instance : Functor Seq where map := @map
instance : LawfulFunctor Seq where
id_map := @map_id
comp_map := @map_comp
map_const := rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : Seq α) :=
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/Seq.lean | 936 | 938 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : {x ∈ s | x ≠ i}.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
/-- An affine combination over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
| theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 572 | 587 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.CircleMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### Facts about `circleMap`
-/
/-- The range of `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem range_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : range (circleMap c R) = sphere c |R| :=
calc
range (circleMap c R) = c +ᵥ R • range fun θ : ℝ => exp (θ * I) := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [← image_vadd, ← image_smul, ← range_comp,
vadd_eq_add, circleMap, comp_def, real_smul]
_ = sphere c |R| := by
rw [range_exp_mul_I, smul_sphere R 0 zero_le_one]
simp
/-- The image of `(0, 2π]` under `circleMap c R` is the circle with center `c` and radius `|R|`. -/
@[simp]
theorem image_circleMap_Ioc (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : circleMap c R '' Ioc 0 (2 * π) = sphere c |R| := by
rw [← range_circleMap, ← (periodic_circleMap c R).image_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos 0, zero_add]
theorem hasDerivAt_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (circleMap c R) (circleMap 0 R θ * I) θ := by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, ofRealCLM_apply, circleMap, ofReal_one, zero_add]
using (((ofRealCLM.hasDerivAt (x := θ)).mul_const I).cexp.const_mul (R : ℂ)).const_add c
theorem differentiable_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (circleMap c R) := fun θ =>
(hasDerivAt_circleMap c R θ).differentiableAt
/-- The circleMap is real analytic. -/
theorem analyticOnNhd_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) :
AnalyticOnNhd ℝ (circleMap c R) Set.univ := by
intro z hz
apply analyticAt_const.add
apply analyticAt_const.mul
rw [← Function.comp_def]
apply analyticAt_cexp.restrictScalars.comp ((ofRealCLM.analyticAt z).mul (by fun_prop))
/-- The circleMap is continuously differentiable. -/
theorem contDiff_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) {n : WithTop ℕ∞} :
ContDiff ℝ n (circleMap c R) :=
(analyticOnNhd_circleMap c R).contDiff
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 114 | 114 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
/-!
# Pairwise relations on a list
This file provides basic results about `List.Pairwise` and `List.pwFilter` (definitions are in
`Data.List.Defs`).
`Pairwise r [a 0, ..., a (n - 1)]` means `∀ i j, i < j → r (a i) (a j)`. For example,
`Pairwise (≠) l` means that all elements of `l` are distinct, and `Pairwise (<) l` means that `l`
is strictly increasing.
`pwFilter r l` is the list obtained by iteratively adding each element of `l` that doesn't break
the pairwiseness of the list we have so far. It thus yields `l'` a maximal sublist of `l` such that
`Pairwise r l'`.
## Tags
sorted, nodup
-/
open Nat Function
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*} {R : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} {a : α}
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop List.Pairwise List.pairwise_iff
/-! ### Pairwise -/
theorem Pairwise.forall_of_forall (H : Symmetric R) (H₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (H₂ : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → R x y :=
H₂.forall_of_forall_of_flip H₁ <| by rwa [H.flip_eq]
theorem Pairwise.forall (hR : Symmetric R) (hl : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ l → a ≠ b → R a b := by
apply Pairwise.forall_of_forall
· exact fun a b h hne => hR (h hne.symm)
· exact fun _ _ hx => (hx rfl).elim
· exact hl.imp (@fun a b h _ => by exact h)
theorem Pairwise.set_pairwise (hl : Pairwise R l) (hr : Symmetric R) : { x | x ∈ l }.Pairwise R :=
hl.forall hr
theorem pairwise_of_reflexive_of_forall_ne (hr : Reflexive R)
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, a ≠ b → R a b) : l.Pairwise R := by
rw [pairwise_iff_forall_sublist]
intro a b hab
if heq : a = b then
cases heq; apply hr
else
apply h <;> try (apply hab.subset; simp)
exact heq
theorem Pairwise.rel_head_tail (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l.tail) :
R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem <| mem_of_mem_tail ha) a := by
cases l with
| nil => simp at ha
| cons b l => exact (pairwise_cons.1 h₁).1 a ha
theorem Pairwise.rel_head_of_rel_head_head (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l)
(hhead : R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha)) :
R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) a := by
cases l with
| nil => simp at ha
| cons b l => exact (mem_cons.mp ha).elim (· ▸ hhead) ((pairwise_cons.1 h₁).1 _)
theorem Pairwise.rel_head [IsRefl α R] (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l) :
R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) a :=
h₁.rel_head_of_rel_head_head ha (refl_of ..)
theorem Pairwise.rel_dropLast_getLast (h : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l.dropLast) :
R a (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem <| dropLast_subset _ ha) := by
rw [← pairwise_reverse] at h
rw [getLast_eq_head_reverse]
exact h.rel_head_tail (by rwa [tail_reverse, mem_reverse])
theorem Pairwise.rel_getLast_of_rel_getLast_getLast (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l)
(hlast : R (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha)) :
R a (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) := by
rw [← dropLast_concat_getLast (ne_nil_of_mem ha), mem_append, List.mem_singleton] at ha
exact ha.elim h₁.rel_dropLast_getLast (· ▸ hlast)
theorem Pairwise.rel_getLast [IsRefl α R] (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l) :
R a (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) :=
h₁.rel_getLast_of_rel_getLast_getLast ha (refl_of ..)
protected alias ⟨Pairwise.of_reverse, Pairwise.reverse⟩ := pairwise_reverse
/-! ### Pairwise filtering -/
protected alias ⟨_, Pairwise.pwFilter⟩ := pwFilter_eq_self
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Pairwise.lean | 136 | 141 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Graph
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
/-! ### Products of modules
This file defines constructors for linear maps whose domains or codomains are products.
It contains theorems relating these to each other, as well as to `Submodule.prod`, `Submodule.map`,
`Submodule.comap`, `LinearMap.range`, and `LinearMap.ker`.
## Main definitions
- products in the domain:
- `LinearMap.fst`
- `LinearMap.snd`
- `LinearMap.coprod`
- `LinearMap.prod_ext`
- products in the codomain:
- `LinearMap.inl`
- `LinearMap.inr`
- `LinearMap.prod`
- products in both domain and codomain:
- `LinearMap.prodMap`
- `LinearEquiv.prodMap`
- `LinearEquiv.skewProd`
-/
universe u v w x y z u' v' w' y'
variable {R : Type u} {K : Type u'} {M : Type v} {V : Type v'} {M₂ : Type w} {V₂ : Type w'}
variable {M₃ : Type y} {V₃ : Type y'} {M₄ : Type z} {ι : Type x}
variable {M₅ M₆ : Type*}
section Prod
namespace LinearMap
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₅] [AddCommMonoid M₆]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
variable [Module R M₅] [Module R M₆]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
section
variable (R M M₂)
/-- The first projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M where
toFun := Prod.fst
map_add' _x _y := rfl
map_smul' _x _y := rfl
/-- The second projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun := Prod.snd
map_add' _x _y := rfl
map_smul' _x _y := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_apply (x : M × M₂) : fst R M M₂ x = x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_apply (x : M × M₂) : snd R M M₂ x = x.2 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : ⇑(fst R M M₂) = Prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : ⇑(snd R M M₂) = Prod.snd := rfl
theorem fst_surjective : Function.Surjective (fst R M M₂) := fun x => ⟨(x, 0), rfl⟩
theorem snd_surjective : Function.Surjective (snd R M M₂) := fun x => ⟨(0, x), rfl⟩
/-- The prod of two linear maps is a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ where
toFun := Pi.prod f g
map_add' x y := by simp only [Pi.prod, Prod.mk_add_mk, map_add]
map_smul' c x := by simp only [Pi.prod, Prod.smul_mk, map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
theorem coe_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : ⇑(f.prod g) = Pi.prod f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (fst R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (snd R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem pair_fst_snd : prod (fst R M M₂) (snd R M M₂) = LinearMap.id := rfl
theorem prod_comp (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄)
(h : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (f.prod g).comp h = (f.comp h).prod (g.comp h) :=
rfl
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same domain is equivalent to taking the product of
their codomains.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def prodEquiv [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] :
((M →ₗ[R] M₂) × (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) ≃ₗ[S] M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f := ((fst _ _ _).comp f, (snd _ _ _).comp f)
left_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
section
variable (R M M₂)
/-- The left injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inl : M →ₗ[R] M × M₂ :=
prod LinearMap.id 0
/-- The right injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inr : M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ :=
prod 0 LinearMap.id
theorem range_inl : range (inl R M M₂) = ker (snd R M M₂) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_ker, mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rfl
· intro h
exact ⟨x.fst, Prod.ext rfl h.symm⟩
theorem ker_snd : ker (snd R M M₂) = range (inl R M M₂) :=
Eq.symm <| range_inl R M M₂
theorem range_inr : range (inr R M M₂) = ker (fst R M M₂) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_ker, mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rfl
· intro h
exact ⟨x.snd, Prod.ext h.symm rfl⟩
theorem ker_fst : ker (fst R M M₂) = range (inr R M M₂) :=
Eq.symm <| range_inr R M M₂
@[simp] theorem fst_comp_inl : fst R M M₂ ∘ₗ inl R M M₂ = id := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_comp_inl : snd R M M₂ ∘ₗ inl R M M₂ = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fst_comp_inr : fst R M M₂ ∘ₗ inr R M M₂ = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_comp_inr : snd R M M₂ ∘ₗ inr R M M₂ = id := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem coe_inl : (inl R M M₂ : M → M × M₂) = fun x => (x, 0) :=
rfl
theorem inl_apply (x : M) : inl R M M₂ x = (x, 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inr : (inr R M M₂ : M₂ → M × M₂) = Prod.mk 0 :=
rfl
theorem inr_apply (x : M₂) : inr R M M₂ x = (0, x) :=
rfl
theorem inl_eq_prod : inl R M M₂ = prod LinearMap.id 0 :=
rfl
theorem inr_eq_prod : inr R M M₂ = prod 0 LinearMap.id :=
rfl
theorem inl_injective : Function.Injective (inl R M M₂) := fun _ => by simp
theorem inr_injective : Function.Injective (inr R M M₂) := fun _ => by simp
/-- The coprod function `x : M × M₂ ↦ f x.1 + g x.2` is a linear map. -/
def coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ :=
f.comp (fst _ _ _) + g.comp (snd _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem coprod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M × M₂) :
coprod f g x = f x.1 + g x.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inl (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (coprod f g).comp (inl R M M₂) = f := by
ext; simp only [map_zero, add_zero, coprod_apply, inl_apply, comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inr (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (coprod f g).comp (inr R M M₂) = g := by
ext; simp only [map_zero, coprod_apply, inr_apply, zero_add, comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inl_inr : coprod (inl R M M₂) (inr R M M₂) = LinearMap.id := by
ext <;>
simp only [Prod.mk_add_mk, add_zero, id_apply, coprod_apply, inl_apply, inr_apply, zero_add]
theorem coprod_zero_left (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₃).coprod g = g.comp (snd R M M₂) :=
zero_add _
theorem coprod_zero_right (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : f.coprod (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) = f.comp (fst R M M₂) :=
add_zero _
theorem comp_coprod (f : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
f.comp (g₁.coprod g₂) = (f.comp g₁).coprod (f.comp g₂) :=
ext fun x => f.map_add (g₁ x.1) (g₂ x.2)
theorem fst_eq_coprod : fst R M M₂ = coprod LinearMap.id 0 := by ext; simp
theorem snd_eq_coprod : snd R M M₂ = coprod 0 LinearMap.id := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem coprod_comp_prod (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (f' : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g' : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(f.coprod g).comp (f'.prod g') = f.comp f' + g.comp g' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coprod_map_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (S : Submodule R M)
(S' : Submodule R M₂) : (Submodule.prod S S').map (LinearMap.coprod f g) = S.map f ⊔ S'.map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [LinearMap.coprod_apply, Submodule.coe_sup, Submodule.map_coe]
rw [← Set.image2_add, Set.image2_image_left, Set.image2_image_right]
exact Set.image_prod fun m m₂ => f m + g m₂
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same codomain is equivalent to taking the product of
their domains.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def coprodEquiv [Module S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] :
((M →ₗ[R] M₃) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)) ≃ₗ[S] M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ where
toFun f := f.1.coprod f.2
invFun f := (f.comp (inl _ _ _), f.comp (inr _ _ _))
left_inv f := by simp only [coprod_inl, coprod_inr]
right_inv f := by simp only [← comp_coprod, comp_id, coprod_inl_inr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp only [Prod.snd_add, add_apply, coprod_apply, Prod.fst_add, add_add_add_comm]
map_smul' r a := by
dsimp
ext
simp only [smul_add, smul_apply, Prod.smul_snd, Prod.smul_fst, coprod_apply]
theorem prod_ext_iff {f g : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} :
f = g ↔ f.comp (inl _ _ _) = g.comp (inl _ _ _) ∧ f.comp (inr _ _ _) = g.comp (inr _ _ _) :=
(coprodEquiv ℕ).symm.injective.eq_iff.symm.trans Prod.ext_iff
/--
Split equality of linear maps from a product into linear maps over each component, to allow `ext`
to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ M₃` and `M₂ →ₗ M₃`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod_ext {f g : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} (hl : f.comp (inl _ _ _) = g.comp (inl _ _ _))
(hr : f.comp (inr _ _ _) = g.comp (inr _ _ _)) : f = g :=
prod_ext_iff.2 ⟨hl, hr⟩
/-- `Prod.map` of two linear maps. -/
def prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ × M₄ :=
(f.comp (fst R M M₂)).prod (g.comp (snd R M M₂))
theorem coe_prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : ⇑(f.prodMap g) = Prod.map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) : f.prodMap g x = (f x.1, g x.2) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_comap_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (S : Submodule R M₂)
(S' : Submodule R M₄) :
(Submodule.prod S S').comap (LinearMap.prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
theorem ker_prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
ker (LinearMap.prodMap f g) = Submodule.prod (ker f) (ker g) := by
dsimp only [ker]
rw [← prodMap_comap_prod, Submodule.prod_bot]
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_id : (id : M →ₗ[R] M).prodMap (id : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_one : (1 : M →ₗ[R] M).prodMap (1 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_comp (f₁₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (f₂₃ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₁₂ : M₄ →ₗ[R] M₅)
(g₂₃ : M₅ →ₗ[R] M₆) :
f₂₃.prodMap g₂₃ ∘ₗ f₁₂.prodMap g₁₂ = (f₂₃ ∘ₗ f₁₂).prodMap (g₂₃ ∘ₗ g₁₂) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_mul (f₁₂ : M →ₗ[R] M) (f₂₃ : M →ₗ[R] M) (g₁₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) (g₂₃ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
f₂₃.prodMap g₂₃ * f₁₂.prodMap g₁₂ = (f₂₃ * f₁₂).prodMap (g₂₃ * g₁₂) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_add (f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₁ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
(f₁ + f₂).prodMap (g₁ + g₂) = f₁.prodMap g₁ + f₂.prodMap g₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_zero : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prodMap (0 : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_smul [DistribMulAction S M₃] [DistribMulAction S M₄] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₄] (s : S) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
prodMap (s • f) (s • g) = s • prodMap f g :=
rfl
variable (R M M₂ M₃ M₄)
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def prodMapLinear [Module S M₃] [Module S M₄] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₄] :
(M →ₗ[R] M₃) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) →ₗ[S] M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ × M₄ where
toFun f := prodMap f.1 f.2
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def prodMapRingHom : (M →ₗ[R] M) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) →+* M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ where
toFun f := prodMap f.1 f.2
map_one' := prodMap_one
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
variable {R M M₂ M₃ M₄}
section map_mul
variable {A : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable {B : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
theorem inl_map_mul (a₁ a₂ : A) :
LinearMap.inl R A B (a₁ * a₂) = LinearMap.inl R A B a₁ * LinearMap.inl R A B a₂ :=
Prod.ext rfl (by simp)
theorem inr_map_mul (b₁ b₂ : B) :
LinearMap.inr R A B (b₁ * b₂) = LinearMap.inr R A B b₁ * LinearMap.inr R A B b₂ :=
Prod.ext (by simp) rfl
end map_mul
end LinearMap
end Prod
namespace LinearMap
variable (R M M₂)
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps!]
def prodMapAlgHom : Module.End R M × Module.End R M₂ →ₐ[R] Module.End R (M × M₂) :=
{ prodMapRingHom R M M₂ with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
[Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
theorem range_coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (f.coprod g) = range f ⊔ range g :=
Submodule.ext fun x => by simp [mem_sup]
theorem isCompl_range_inl_inr : IsCompl (range <| inl R M M₂) (range <| inr R M M₂) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_def]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, inl_apply, inr_apply, mem_bot] at hx hy ⊢
exact ⟨hy.1.symm, hx.2.symm⟩
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ -
simp only [mem_sup, mem_range, exists_prop]
refine ⟨(x, 0), ⟨x, rfl⟩, (0, y), ⟨y, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
simp
theorem sup_range_inl_inr : (range <| inl R M M₂) ⊔ (range <| inr R M M₂) = ⊤ :=
IsCompl.sup_eq_top isCompl_range_inl_inr
theorem disjoint_inl_inr : Disjoint (range <| inl R M M₂) (range <| inr R M M₂) := by
simp +contextual [disjoint_def, @eq_comm M 0, @eq_comm M₂ 0]
theorem map_coprod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : Submodule R M)
(q : Submodule R M₂) : map (coprod f g) (p.prod q) = map f p ⊔ map g q := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 ?_) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 ?_))
· rw [SetLike.le_def]
rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, h₂, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
· exact fun x hx => ⟨(x, 0), by simp [hx]⟩
· exact fun x hx => ⟨(0, x), by simp [hx]⟩
theorem comap_prod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(q : Submodule R M₃) : comap (prod f g) (p.prod q) = comap f p ⊓ comap g q :=
Submodule.ext fun _x => Iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_inf_comap (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.comap (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) ⊓ q.comap (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) :=
Submodule.ext fun _x => Iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_sup_map (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.map (LinearMap.inl R M M₂) ⊔ q.map (LinearMap.inr R M M₂) := by
rw [← map_coprod_prod, coprod_inl_inr, map_id]
theorem span_inl_union_inr {s : Set M} {t : Set M₂} :
span R (inl R M M₂ '' s ∪ inr R M M₂ '' t) = (span R s).prod (span R t) := by
rw [span_union, prod_eq_sup_map, ← span_image, ← span_image]
@[simp]
theorem ker_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker (prod f g) = ker f ⊓ ker g := by
rw [ker, ← prod_bot, comap_prod_prod]; rfl
theorem range_prod_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
range (prod f g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) := by
simp only [SetLike.le_def, prod_apply, mem_range, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_prod, exists_imp]
rintro _ x rfl
exact ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem ker_prod_ker_le_ker_coprod {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂] {M₃ : Type*}
[AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(ker f).prod (ker g) ≤ ker (f.coprod g) := by
rintro ⟨y, z⟩
simp +contextual
theorem ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] {M₃ : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(hd : Disjoint (range f) (range g)) : ker (f.coprod g) = (ker f).prod (ker g) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (ker_prod_ker_le_ker_coprod f g)
rintro ⟨y, z⟩ h
simp only [mem_ker, mem_prod, coprod_apply] at h ⊢
have : f y ∈ (range f) ⊓ (range g) := by
simp only [true_and, mem_range, mem_inf, exists_apply_eq_apply]
use -z
rwa [eq_comm, map_neg, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
rw [hd.eq_bot, mem_bot] at this
rw [this] at h
simpa [this] using h
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
theorem sup_eq_range (p q : Submodule R M) : p ⊔ q = range (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype) :=
Submodule.ext fun x => by simp [Submodule.mem_sup, SetLike.exists]
variable (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_inl : p.map (inl R M M₂) = prod p ⊥ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_left_comm, eq_comm, mem_map, Prod.mk_inj, inl_apply, mem_bot, exists_eq_left',
mem_prod]
@[simp]
theorem map_inr : q.map (inr R M M₂) = prod ⊥ q := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem comap_fst : p.comap (fst R M M₂) = prod p ⊤ := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_snd : q.comap (snd R M M₂) = prod ⊤ q := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_comap_inl : (prod p q).comap (inl R M M₂) = p := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_comap_inr : (prod p q).comap (inr R M M₂) = q := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_fst : (prod p q).map (fst R M M₂) = p := by
ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ q)]
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_snd : (prod p q).map (snd R M M₂) = q := by
ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ p)]
@[simp]
theorem ker_inl : ker (inl R M M₂) = ⊥ := by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inl]
@[simp]
theorem ker_inr : ker (inr R M M₂) = ⊥ := by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inr]
@[simp]
theorem range_fst : range (fst R M M₂) = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, ← prod_top, prod_map_fst]
@[simp]
theorem range_snd : range (snd R M M₂) = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, ← prod_top, prod_map_snd]
variable (R M M₂)
/-- `M` as a submodule of `M × N`. -/
def fst : Submodule R (M × M₂) :=
(⊥ : Submodule R M₂).comap (LinearMap.snd R M M₂)
/-- `M` as a submodule of `M × N` is isomorphic to `M`. -/
@[simps]
def fstEquiv : Submodule.fst R M M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M where
-- Porting note: proofs were `tidy` or `simp`
toFun x := x.1.1
invFun m := ⟨⟨m, 0⟩, by simp [fst]⟩
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hy⟩
simp only [fst, comap_bot, mem_ker, snd_apply] at hy
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and] using hy.symm
right_inv := by rintro x; rfl
theorem fst_map_fst : (Submodule.fst R M M₂).map (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) = ⊤ := by
aesop
theorem fst_map_snd : (Submodule.fst R M M₂).map (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) = ⊥ := by
aesop (add simp fst)
/-- `N` as a submodule of `M × N`. -/
def snd : Submodule R (M × M₂) :=
(⊥ : Submodule R M).comap (LinearMap.fst R M M₂)
/-- `N` as a submodule of `M × N` is isomorphic to `N`. -/
@[simps]
def sndEquiv : Submodule.snd R M M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ where
-- Porting note: proofs were `tidy` or `simp`
toFun x := x.1.2
invFun n := ⟨⟨0, n⟩, by simp [snd]⟩
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hx⟩
simp only [snd, comap_bot, mem_ker, fst_apply] at hx
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq, and_true] using hx.symm
right_inv := by rintro x; rfl
theorem snd_map_fst : (Submodule.snd R M M₂).map (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) = ⊥ := by
aesop (add simp snd)
theorem snd_map_snd : (Submodule.snd R M M₂).map (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) = ⊤ := by
aesop
theorem fst_sup_snd : Submodule.fst R M M₂ ⊔ Submodule.snd R M M₂ = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro ⟨m, n⟩ -
rw [show (m, n) = (m, 0) + (0, n) by simp]
apply Submodule.add_mem (Submodule.fst R M M₂ ⊔ Submodule.snd R M M₂)
· exact Submodule.mem_sup_left (Submodule.mem_comap.mpr (by simp))
· exact Submodule.mem_sup_right (Submodule.mem_comap.mpr (by simp))
theorem fst_inf_snd : Submodule.fst R M M₂ ⊓ Submodule.snd R M M₂ = ⊥ := by
aesop
theorem le_prod_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} {q : Submodule R (M × M₂)} :
q ≤ p₁.prod p₂ ↔ map (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) q ≤ p₁ ∧ map (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) q ≤ p₂ := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· rintro x ⟨⟨y1, y2⟩, ⟨hy1, rfl⟩⟩
exact (h hy1).1
· rintro x ⟨⟨y1, y2⟩, ⟨hy1, rfl⟩⟩
exact (h hy1).2
· rintro ⟨hH, hK⟩ ⟨x1, x2⟩ h
exact ⟨hH ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, hK ⟨_, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem prod_le_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} {q : Submodule R (M × M₂)} :
p₁.prod p₂ ≤ q ↔ map (LinearMap.inl R M M₂) p₁ ≤ q ∧ map (LinearMap.inr R M M₂) p₂ ≤ q := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
apply h
exact ⟨hx, zero_mem p₂⟩
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
apply h
exact ⟨zero_mem p₁, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨hH, hK⟩ ⟨x1, x2⟩ ⟨h1, h2⟩
have h1' : (LinearMap.inl R _ _) x1 ∈ q := by
apply hH
simpa using h1
have h2' : (LinearMap.inr R _ _) x2 ∈ q := by
apply hK
simpa using h2
simpa using add_mem h1' h2'
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} :
p₁.prod p₂ = ⊥ ↔ p₁ = ⊥ ∧ p₂ = ⊥ := by
simp only [eq_bot_iff, prod_le_iff, (gc_map_comap _).le_iff_le, comap_bot, ker_inl, ker_inr]
theorem prod_eq_top_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} :
p₁.prod p₂ = ⊤ ↔ p₁ = ⊤ ∧ p₂ = ⊤ := by
simp only [eq_top_iff, le_prod_iff, ← (gc_map_comap _).le_iff_le, map_top, range_fst, range_snd]
end Submodule
namespace LinearEquiv
/-- Product of modules is commutative up to linear isomorphism. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodComm (R M N : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M]
[Module R N] : (M × N) ≃ₗ[R] N × M :=
{ AddEquiv.prodComm with
toFun := Prod.swap
map_smul' := fun _r ⟨_m, _n⟩ => rfl }
section prodComm
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
theorem fst_comp_prodComm :
(LinearMap.fst R M₂ M).comp (prodComm R M M₂).toLinearMap = (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) := by
ext <;> simp
theorem snd_comp_prodComm :
(LinearMap.snd R M₂ M).comp (prodComm R M M₂).toLinearMap = (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) := by
ext <;> simp
end prodComm
/-- Product of modules is associative up to linear isomorphism. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodAssoc (R M₁ M₂ M₃ : Type*) [Semiring R]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] : ((M₁ × M₂) × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] (M₁ × (M₂ × M₃)) :=
{ AddEquiv.prodAssoc with
map_smul' := fun _r ⟨_m, _n⟩ => rfl }
section prodAssoc
variable {M₁ : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
theorem fst_comp_prodAssoc :
(LinearMap.fst R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)).comp (prodAssoc R M₁ M₂ M₃).toLinearMap =
(LinearMap.fst R M₁ M₂).comp (LinearMap.fst R (M₁ × M₂) M₃) := by
ext <;> simp
| theorem snd_comp_prodAssoc :
(LinearMap.snd R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)).comp (prodAssoc R M₁ M₂ M₃).toLinearMap =
(LinearMap.snd R M₁ M₂).prodMap (LinearMap.id : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₃):= by
ext <;> simp
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Prod.lean | 667 | 671 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Filter
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Measure
import Mathlib.Analysis.Oscillation
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
/-!
# Integrals of Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane
In this file we define the integral of a function over a box in `ℝⁿ`. The same definition works for
Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane integrals.
As usual, we represent `ℝⁿ` as the type of functions `ι → ℝ` for some finite type `ι`. A rectangular
box `(l, u]` in `ℝⁿ` is defined to be the set `{x : ι → ℝ | ∀ i, l i < x i ∧ x i ≤ u i}`, see
`BoxIntegral.Box`.
Let `vol` be a box-additive function on boxes in `ℝⁿ` with codomain `E →L[ℝ] F`. Given a function
`f : ℝⁿ → E`, a box `I` and a tagged partition `π` of this box, the *integral sum* of `f` over `π`
with respect to the volume `vol` is the sum of `vol J (f (π.tag J))` over all boxes of `π`. Here
`π.tag J` is the point (tag) in `ℝⁿ` associated with the box `J`.
The integral is defined as the limit of integral sums along a filter. Different filters correspond
to different integration theories. In order to avoid code duplication, all our definitions and
theorems take an argument `l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`. This is a type that holds three
boolean values, and encodes eight filters including those corresponding to Riemann,
Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane integrals.
Following the design of infinite sums (see `hasSum` and `tsum`), we define a predicate
`BoxIntegral.HasIntegral` and a function `BoxIntegral.integral` that returns a vector satisfying
the predicate or zero if the function is not integrable.
Then we prove some basic properties of box integrals (linearity, a formula for the integral of a
constant). We also prove a version of the Henstock-Sacks inequality (see
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet` and
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq`), prove
integrability of continuous functions, and provide a criterion for integrability w.r.t. a
non-Riemann filter (e.g., Henstock-Kurzweil and McShane).
## Notation
- `ℝⁿ`: local notation for `ι → ℝ`
## Tags
integral
-/
open scoped Topology NNReal Filter Uniformity BoxIntegral
open Set Finset Function Filter Metric BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type u} {E : Type v} {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {I J : Box ι} {π : TaggedPrepartition I}
open TaggedPrepartition
local notation "ℝⁿ" => ι → ℝ
/-!
### Integral sum and its basic properties
-/
/-- The integral sum of `f : ℝⁿ → E` over a tagged prepartition `π` w.r.t. box-additive volume `vol`
with codomain `E →L[ℝ] F` is the sum of `vol J (f (π.tag J))` over all boxes of `π`. -/
def integralSum (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) : F :=
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, vol J (f (π.tag J))
theorem integralSum_biUnionTagged (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, TaggedPrepartition J) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionTagged πi) = ∑ J ∈ π.boxes, integralSum f vol (πi J) := by
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans <| sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => ?_
rw [π.tag_biUnionTagged hJ hJ']
theorem integralSum_biUnion_partition (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (hπi : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol (π.biUnionPrepartition πi) = integralSum f vol π := by
refine (π.sum_biUnion_boxes _ _).trans (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_)
calc
(∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, vol J' (f (π.tag <| π.toPrepartition.biUnionIndex πi J'))) =
∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, vol J' (f (π.tag J)) :=
sum_congr rfl fun J' hJ' => by rw [Prepartition.biUnionIndex_of_mem _ hJ hJ']
_ = vol J (f (π.tag J)) :=
(vol.map ⟨⟨fun g : E →L[ℝ] F => g (f (π.tag J)), rfl⟩, fun _ _ => rfl⟩).sum_partition_boxes
le_top (hπi J hJ)
theorem integralSum_inf_partition (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I)
{π' : Prepartition I} (h : π'.IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol (π.infPrepartition π') = integralSum f vol π :=
integralSum_biUnion_partition f vol π _ fun _J hJ => h.restrict (Prepartition.le_of_mem _ hJ)
open Classical in
theorem integralSum_fiberwise {α} (g : Box ι → α) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
(∑ y ∈ π.boxes.image g, integralSum f vol (π.filter (g · = y))) = integralSum f vol π :=
π.sum_fiberwise g fun J => vol J (f <| π.tag J)
theorem integralSum_sub_partitions (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F)
{π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I} (h₁ : π₁.IsPartition) (h₂ : π₂.IsPartition) :
integralSum f vol π₁ - integralSum f vol π₂ =
∑ J ∈ (π₁.toPrepartition ⊓ π₂.toPrepartition).boxes,
(vol J (f <| (π₁.infPrepartition π₂.toPrepartition).tag J) -
vol J (f <| (π₂.infPrepartition π₁.toPrepartition).tag J)) := by
rw [← integralSum_inf_partition f vol π₁ h₂, ← integralSum_inf_partition f vol π₂ h₁,
integralSum, integralSum, Finset.sum_sub_distrib]
simp only [infPrepartition_toPrepartition, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_disjUnion (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) {π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I}
(h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
integralSum f vol (π₁.disjUnion π₂ h) = integralSum f vol π₁ + integralSum f vol π₂ := by
refine (Prepartition.sum_disj_union_boxes h _).trans
(congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_))
· rw [disjUnion_tag_of_mem_left _ hJ]
· rw [disjUnion_tag_of_mem_right _ hJ]
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_add (f g : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
integralSum (f + g) vol π = integralSum f vol π + integralSum g vol π := by
simp only [integralSum, Pi.add_apply, (vol _).map_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_neg (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
integralSum (-f) vol π = -integralSum f vol π := by
simp only [integralSum, Pi.neg_apply, (vol _).map_neg, Finset.sum_neg_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem integralSum_smul (c : ℝ) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (π : TaggedPrepartition I) :
integralSum (c • f) vol π = c • integralSum f vol π := by
simp only [integralSum, Finset.smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
variable [Fintype ι]
/-!
### Basic integrability theory
-/
/-- The predicate `HasIntegral I l f vol y` says that `y` is the integral of `f` over `I` along `l`
w.r.t. volume `vol`. This means that integral sums of `f` tend to `𝓝 y` along
`BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion I ⊤`. -/
def HasIntegral (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) (y : F) :
Prop :=
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤) (𝓝 y)
/-- A function is integrable if there exists a vector that satisfies the `HasIntegral`
predicate. -/
def Integrable (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) :=
∃ y, HasIntegral I l f vol y
open Classical in
/-- The integral of a function `f` over a box `I` along a filter `l` w.r.t. a volume `vol`.
Returns zero on non-integrable functions. -/
def integral (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (f : ℝⁿ → E) (vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F) :=
if h : Integrable I l f vol then h.choose else 0
-- Porting note: using the above notation ℝⁿ here causes the theorem below to be silently ignored
-- see https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Lean.204.20doesn't.20add.20lemma.20to.20the.20environment/near/363764522
-- and https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2257
variable {l : IntegrationParams} {f g : (ι → ℝ) → E} {vol : ι →ᵇᵃ E →L[ℝ] F} {y y' : F}
/-- Reinterpret `BoxIntegral.HasIntegral` as `Filter.Tendsto`, e.g., dot-notation theorems
that are shadowed in the `BoxIntegral.HasIntegral` namespace. -/
theorem HasIntegral.tendsto (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) :
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤) (𝓝 y) :=
h
/-- The `ε`-`δ` definition of `BoxIntegral.HasIntegral`. -/
theorem hasIntegral_iff : HasIntegral I l f vol y ↔
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ), (∀ c, l.RCond (r c)) ∧
∀ c π, l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π → IsPartition π → dist (integralSum f vol π) y ≤ ε :=
((l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion_top I).tendsto_iff nhds_basis_closedBall).trans <| by
simp [@forall_swap ℝ≥0 (TaggedPrepartition I)]
/-- Quite often it is more natural to prove an estimate of the form `a * ε`, not `ε` in the RHS of
`BoxIntegral.hasIntegral_iff`, so we provide this auxiliary lemma. -/
theorem HasIntegral.of_mul (a : ℝ)
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ), (∀ c, l.RCond (r c)) ∧ ∀ c π,
l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π → IsPartition π → dist (integralSum f vol π) y ≤ a * ε) :
HasIntegral I l f vol y := by
refine hasIntegral_iff.2 fun ε hε => ?_
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt hε a with ⟨ε', hε', ha⟩
rcases h ε' hε' with ⟨r, hr, H⟩
exact ⟨r, hr, fun c π hπ hπp => (H c π hπ hπp).trans ha.le⟩
theorem integrable_iff_cauchy [CompleteSpace F] :
Integrable I l f vol ↔ Cauchy ((l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤).map (integralSum f vol)) :=
cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
/-- In a complete space, a function is integrable if and only if its integral sums form a Cauchy
net. Here we restate this fact in terms of `∀ ε > 0, ∃ r, ...`. -/
theorem integrable_iff_cauchy_basis [CompleteSpace F] : Integrable I l f vol ↔
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ), (∀ c, l.RCond (r c)) ∧
∀ c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂, l.MemBaseSet I c₁ (r c₁) π₁ → π₁.IsPartition → l.MemBaseSet I c₂ (r c₂) π₂ →
π₂.IsPartition → dist (integralSum f vol π₁) (integralSum f vol π₂) ≤ ε := by
rw [integrable_iff_cauchy, cauchy_map_iff',
(l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion_top _).prod_self.tendsto_iff uniformity_basis_dist_le]
refine forall₂_congr fun ε _ => exists_congr fun r => ?_
simp only [exists_prop, Prod.forall, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_imp, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, and_imp,
mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq]
exact
and_congr Iff.rfl
⟨fun H c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂ h₁ hU₁ h₂ hU₂ => H π₁ π₂ c₁ h₁ hU₁ c₂ h₂ hU₂,
fun H π₁ π₂ c₁ h₁ hU₁ c₂ h₂ hU₂ => H c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂ h₁ hU₁ h₂ hU₂⟩
theorem HasIntegral.mono {l₁ l₂ : IntegrationParams} (h : HasIntegral I l₁ f vol y) (hl : l₂ ≤ l₁) :
HasIntegral I l₂ f vol y :=
h.mono_left <| IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion_mono _ hl _
protected theorem Integrable.hasIntegral (h : Integrable I l f vol) :
HasIntegral I l f vol (integral I l f vol) := by
rw [integral, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
theorem Integrable.mono {l'} (h : Integrable I l f vol) (hle : l' ≤ l) : Integrable I l' f vol :=
⟨_, h.hasIntegral.mono hle⟩
theorem HasIntegral.unique (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (h' : HasIntegral I l f vol y') : y = y' :=
tendsto_nhds_unique h h'
theorem HasIntegral.integrable (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) : Integrable I l f vol :=
⟨_, h⟩
theorem HasIntegral.integral_eq (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) : integral I l f vol = y :=
h.integrable.hasIntegral.unique h
nonrec theorem HasIntegral.add (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (h' : HasIntegral I l g vol y') :
HasIntegral I l (f + g) vol (y + y') := by
simpa only [HasIntegral, ← integralSum_add] using h.add h'
theorem Integrable.add (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
Integrable I l (f + g) vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.add hg.hasIntegral).integrable
theorem integral_add (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
integral I l (f + g) vol = integral I l f vol + integral I l g vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.add hg.hasIntegral).integral_eq
nonrec theorem HasIntegral.neg (hf : HasIntegral I l f vol y) : HasIntegral I l (-f) vol (-y) := by
simpa only [HasIntegral, ← integralSum_neg] using hf.neg
theorem Integrable.neg (hf : Integrable I l f vol) : Integrable I l (-f) vol :=
hf.hasIntegral.neg.integrable
theorem Integrable.of_neg (hf : Integrable I l (-f) vol) : Integrable I l f vol :=
neg_neg f ▸ hf.neg
@[simp]
theorem integrable_neg : Integrable I l (-f) vol ↔ Integrable I l f vol :=
⟨fun h => h.of_neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem integral_neg : integral I l (-f) vol = -integral I l f vol := by
classical
exact if h : Integrable I l f vol then h.hasIntegral.neg.integral_eq
else by rw [integral, integral, dif_neg h, dif_neg (mt Integrable.of_neg h), neg_zero]
theorem HasIntegral.sub (h : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (h' : HasIntegral I l g vol y') :
HasIntegral I l (f - g) vol (y - y') := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add h'.neg
theorem Integrable.sub (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
Integrable I l (f - g) vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.sub hg.hasIntegral).integrable
theorem integral_sub (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (hg : Integrable I l g vol) :
integral I l (f - g) vol = integral I l f vol - integral I l g vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.sub hg.hasIntegral).integral_eq
theorem hasIntegral_const (c : E) : HasIntegral I l (fun _ => c) vol (vol I c) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' <| (l.eventually_isPartition I).mono fun _π hπ => Eq.symm <|
(vol.map ⟨⟨fun g : E →L[ℝ] F ↦ g c, rfl⟩, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩).sum_partition_boxes le_top hπ
@[simp]
theorem integral_const (c : E) : integral I l (fun _ => c) vol = vol I c :=
(hasIntegral_const c).integral_eq
theorem integrable_const (c : E) : Integrable I l (fun _ => c) vol :=
⟨_, hasIntegral_const c⟩
theorem hasIntegral_zero : HasIntegral I l (fun _ => (0 : E)) vol 0 := by
simpa only [← (vol I).map_zero] using hasIntegral_const (0 : E)
theorem integrable_zero : Integrable I l (fun _ => (0 : E)) vol :=
⟨0, hasIntegral_zero⟩
theorem integral_zero : integral I l (fun _ => (0 : E)) vol = 0 :=
hasIntegral_zero.integral_eq
theorem HasIntegral.sum {α : Type*} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝⁿ → E} {g : α → F}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, HasIntegral I l (f i) vol (g i)) :
HasIntegral I l (fun x => ∑ i ∈ s, f i x) vol (∑ i ∈ s, g i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s ha ihs; · simp [hasIntegral_zero]
simp only [Finset.sum_insert ha]; rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at h
exact h.1.add (ihs h.2)
theorem HasIntegral.smul (hf : HasIntegral I l f vol y) (c : ℝ) :
HasIntegral I l (c • f) vol (c • y) := by
simpa only [HasIntegral, ← integralSum_smul] using
(tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto _ _ (𝓝 c)).smul hf
theorem Integrable.smul (hf : Integrable I l f vol) (c : ℝ) : Integrable I l (c • f) vol :=
(hf.hasIntegral.smul c).integrable
theorem Integrable.of_smul {c : ℝ} (hf : Integrable I l (c • f) vol) (hc : c ≠ 0) :
Integrable I l f vol := by
simpa [inv_smul_smul₀ hc] using hf.smul c⁻¹
@[simp]
theorem integral_smul (c : ℝ) : integral I l (fun x => c • f x) vol = c • integral I l f vol := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc); · simp only [zero_smul, integral_zero]
by_cases hf : Integrable I l f vol
· exact (hf.hasIntegral.smul c).integral_eq
· have : ¬Integrable I l (fun x => c • f x) vol := mt (fun h => h.of_smul hc) hf
rw [integral, integral, dif_neg hf, dif_neg this, smul_zero]
open MeasureTheory
/-- The integral of a nonnegative function w.r.t. a volume generated by a locally-finite measure is
nonnegative. -/
theorem integral_nonneg {g : ℝⁿ → ℝ} (hg : ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, 0 ≤ g x) (μ : Measure ℝⁿ)
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] : 0 ≤ integral I l g μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul := by
by_cases hgi : Integrable I l g μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul
· refine ge_of_tendsto' hgi.hasIntegral fun π => sum_nonneg fun J _ => ?_
exact mul_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg (hg _ <| π.tag_mem_Icc _)
· rw [integral, dif_neg hgi]
/-- If `‖f x‖ ≤ g x` on `[l, u]` and `g` is integrable, then the norm of the integral of `f` is less
than or equal to the integral of `g`. -/
theorem norm_integral_le_of_norm_le {g : ℝⁿ → ℝ} (hle : ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x)
(μ : Measure ℝⁿ) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (hg : Integrable I l g μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul) :
‖(integral I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul : E)‖ ≤ integral I l g μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul
· refine le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hfi.hasIntegral.norm hg.hasIntegral fun π => ?_
refine norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun J _ => ?_
simp only [BoxAdditiveMap.toSMul_apply, norm_smul, smul_eq_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
μ.toBoxAdditive_apply, abs_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hle _ <| π.tag_mem_Icc _) ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
· rw [integral, dif_neg hfi, norm_zero]
exact integral_nonneg (fun x hx => (norm_nonneg _).trans (hle x hx)) μ
theorem norm_integral_le_of_le_const {c : ℝ}
(hc : ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) (μ : Measure ℝⁿ) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] :
‖(integral I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul : E)‖ ≤ μ.real I * c := by
simpa only [integral_const] using norm_integral_le_of_norm_le hc μ (integrable_const c)
/-!
# Henstock-Sacks inequality and integrability on subboxes
Henstock-Sacks inequality for Henstock-Kurzweil integral says the following. Let `f` be a function
integrable on a box `I`; let `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` be a function such that for any tagged partition of
`I` subordinate to `r`, the integral sum over this partition is `ε`-close to the integral. Then for
any tagged prepartition (i.e. a finite collections of pairwise disjoint subboxes of `I` with tagged
points) `π`, the integral sum over `π` differs from the integral of `f` over the part of `I` covered
by `π` by at most `ε`. The actual statement in the library is a bit more complicated to make it work
for any `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`. We formalize several versions of this inequality in
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet`,
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq`, and
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet`.
Instead of using predicate assumptions on `r`, we define
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.convergenceR (h : integrable I l f vol) (ε : ℝ) (c : ℝ≥0) : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)`
to be a function `r` such that
- if `l.bRiemann`, then `r` is a constant;
- if `ε > 0`, then for any tagged partition `π` of `I` subordinate to `r` (more precisely,
satisfying the predicate `l.mem_base_set I c r`), the integral sum of `f` over `π` differs from
the integral of `f` over `I` by at most `ε`.
The proof is mostly based on
[Russel A. Gordon, *The integrals of Lebesgue, Denjoy, Perron, and Henstock*][Gordon55].
-/
namespace Integrable
/-- If `ε > 0`, then `BoxIntegral.Integrable.convergenceR` is a function `r : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)`
such that for every `c : ℝ≥0`, for every tagged partition `π` subordinate to `r` (and satisfying
additional distortion estimates if `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.bDistortion l = true`), the
corresponding integral sum is `ε`-close to the integral.
If `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.bRiemann = true`, then `r c x` does not depend on `x`. If
`ε ≤ 0`, then we use `r c x = 1`. -/
def convergenceR (h : Integrable I l f vol) (ε : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ) :=
if hε : 0 < ε then (hasIntegral_iff.1 h.hasIntegral ε hε).choose
else fun _ _ => ⟨1, Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one⟩
variable {c c₁ c₂ : ℝ≥0} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I}
theorem convergenceR_cond (h : Integrable I l f vol) (ε : ℝ) (c : ℝ≥0) :
l.RCond (h.convergenceR ε c) := by
rw [convergenceR]; split_ifs with h₀
exacts [(hasIntegral_iff.1 h.hasIntegral ε h₀).choose_spec.1 _, fun _ x => rfl]
theorem dist_integralSum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet (h : Integrable I l f vol) (h₀ : 0 < ε)
(hπ : l.MemBaseSet I c (h.convergenceR ε c) π) (hπp : π.IsPartition) :
dist (integralSum f vol π) (integral I l f vol) ≤ ε := by
rw [convergenceR, dif_pos h₀] at hπ
exact (hasIntegral_iff.1 h.hasIntegral ε h₀).choose_spec.2 c _ hπ hπp
/-- **Henstock-Sacks inequality**. Let `r₁ r₂ : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` be a function such that for any tagged
*partition* of `I` subordinate to `rₖ`, `k=1,2`, the integral sum of `f` over this partition differs
from the integral of `f` by at most `εₖ`. Then for any two tagged *prepartition* `π₁ π₂` subordinate
to `r₁` and `r₂` respectively and covering the same part of `I`, the integral sums of `f` over these
prepartitions differ from each other by at most `ε₁ + ε₂`.
The actual statement
- uses `BoxIntegral.Integrable.convergenceR` instead of a predicate assumption on `r`;
- uses `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet` instead of “subordinate to `r`” to
account for additional requirements like being a Henstock partition or having a bounded
distortion.
See also `BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq` and
`BoxIntegral.Integrable.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet`.
-/
theorem dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet (h : Integrable I l f vol) (hpos₁ : 0 < ε₁)
(hpos₂ : 0 < ε₂) (h₁ : l.MemBaseSet I c₁ (h.convergenceR ε₁ c₁) π₁)
(h₂ : l.MemBaseSet I c₂ (h.convergenceR ε₂ c₂) π₂) (HU : π₁.iUnion = π₂.iUnion) :
dist (integralSum f vol π₁) (integralSum f vol π₂) ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rcases h₁.exists_common_compl h₂ HU with ⟨π, hπU, hπc₁, hπc₂⟩
set r : ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ) := fun x => min (h.convergenceR ε₁ c₁ x) (h.convergenceR ε₂ c₂ x)
set πr := π.toSubordinate r
have H₁ :
dist (integralSum f vol (π₁.unionComplToSubordinate π hπU r)) (integral I l f vol) ≤ ε₁ :=
h.dist_integralSum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet hpos₁
(h₁.unionComplToSubordinate (fun _ _ => min_le_left _ _) hπU hπc₁)
(isPartition_unionComplToSubordinate _ _ _ _)
rw [HU] at hπU
have H₂ :
dist (integralSum f vol (π₂.unionComplToSubordinate π hπU r)) (integral I l f vol) ≤ ε₂ :=
h.dist_integralSum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet hpos₂
(h₂.unionComplToSubordinate (fun _ _ => min_le_right _ _) hπU hπc₂)
(isPartition_unionComplToSubordinate _ _ _ _)
simpa [unionComplToSubordinate] using (dist_triangle_right _ _ _).trans (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
/-- If `f` is integrable on `I` along `l`, then for two sufficiently fine tagged prepartitions
(in the sense of the filter `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilter l I`) such that they cover
the same part of `I`, the integral sums of `f` over `π₁` and `π₂` are very close to each other. -/
theorem tendsto_integralSum_toFilter_prod_self_inf_iUnion_eq_uniformity (h : Integrable I l f vol) :
Tendsto (fun π : TaggedPrepartition I × TaggedPrepartition I =>
(integralSum f vol π.1, integralSum f vol π.2))
((l.toFilter I ×ˢ l.toFilter I) ⊓ 𝓟 {π | π.1.iUnion = π.2.iUnion}) (𝓤 F) := by
refine (((l.hasBasis_toFilter I).prod_self.inf_principal _).tendsto_iff
uniformity_basis_dist_le).2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
replace ε0 := half_pos ε0
use h.convergenceR (ε / 2), h.convergenceR_cond (ε / 2); rintro ⟨π₁, π₂⟩ ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, hU⟩
rw [← add_halves ε]
exact h.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet ε0 ε0 h₁.choose_spec h₂.choose_spec hU
/-- If `f` is integrable on a box `I` along `l`, then for any fixed subset `s` of `I` that can be
represented as a finite union of boxes, the integral sums of `f` over tagged prepartitions that
cover exactly `s` form a Cauchy “sequence” along `l`. -/
theorem cauchy_map_integralSum_toFilteriUnion (h : Integrable I l f vol) (π₀ : Prepartition I) :
Cauchy ((l.toFilteriUnion I π₀).map (integralSum f vol)) := by
refine ⟨inferInstance, ?_⟩
rw [prod_map_map_eq, ← toFilter_inf_iUnion_eq, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
exact h.tendsto_integralSum_toFilter_prod_self_inf_iUnion_eq_uniformity.mono_left
(inf_le_inf_left _ <| principal_mono.2 fun π h => h.1.trans h.2.symm)
variable [CompleteSpace F]
theorem to_subbox_aux (h : Integrable I l f vol) (hJ : J ≤ I) :
∃ y : F, HasIntegral J l f vol y ∧
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I (Prepartition.single I J hJ)) (𝓝 y) := by
refine (cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.1
(h.cauchy_map_integralSum_toFilteriUnion (.single I J hJ))).imp fun y hy ↦ ⟨?_, hy⟩
convert hy.comp (l.tendsto_embedBox_toFilteriUnion_top hJ) -- faster than `exact` here
/-- If `f` is integrable on a box `I`, then it is integrable on any subbox of `I`. -/
theorem to_subbox (h : Integrable I l f vol) (hJ : J ≤ I) : Integrable J l f vol :=
(h.to_subbox_aux hJ).imp fun _ => And.left
/-- If `f` is integrable on a box `I`, then integral sums of `f` over tagged prepartitions
that cover exactly a subbox `J ≤ I` tend to the integral of `f` over `J` along `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_integralSum_toFilteriUnion_single (h : Integrable I l f vol) (hJ : J ≤ I) :
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I (Prepartition.single I J hJ))
(𝓝 <| integral J l f vol) :=
let ⟨_y, h₁, h₂⟩ := h.to_subbox_aux hJ
h₁.integral_eq.symm ▸ h₂
/-- **Henstock-Sacks inequality**. Let `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` be a function such that for any tagged
*partition* of `I` subordinate to `r`, the integral sum of `f` over this partition differs from the
integral of `f` by at most `ε`. Then for any tagged *prepartition* `π` subordinate to `r`, the
integral sum of `f` over this prepartition differs from the integral of `f` over the part of `I`
covered by `π` by at most `ε`.
The actual statement
- uses `BoxIntegral.Integrable.convergenceR` instead of a predicate assumption on `r`;
- uses `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet` instead of “subordinate to `r`” to
account for additional requirements like being a Henstock partition or having a bounded
distortion;
- takes an extra argument `π₀ : prepartition I` and an assumption `π.Union = π₀.Union` instead of
using `π.to_prepartition`.
-/
theorem dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq (h : Integrable I l f vol)
(h0 : 0 < ε) (hπ : l.MemBaseSet I c (h.convergenceR ε c) π) {π₀ : Prepartition I}
(hU : π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion) :
dist (integralSum f vol π) (∑ J ∈ π₀.boxes, integral J l f vol) ≤ ε := by
-- Let us prove that the distance is less than or equal to `ε + δ` for all positive `δ`.
refine le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun δ δ0 => ?_
-- First we choose some constants.
set δ' : ℝ := δ / (#π₀.boxes + 1)
have H0 : 0 < (#π₀.boxes + 1 : ℝ) := Nat.cast_add_one_pos _
have δ'0 : 0 < δ' := div_pos δ0 H0
set C := max π₀.distortion π₀.compl.distortion
/- Next we choose a tagged partition of each `J ∈ π₀` such that the integral sum of `f` over this
partition is `δ'`-close to the integral of `f` over `J`. -/
have : ∀ J ∈ π₀, ∃ πi : TaggedPrepartition J,
πi.IsPartition ∧ dist (integralSum f vol πi) (integral J l f vol) ≤ δ' ∧
l.MemBaseSet J C (h.convergenceR δ' C) πi := by
intro J hJ
have Hle : J ≤ I := π₀.le_of_mem hJ
have HJi : Integrable J l f vol := h.to_subbox Hle
set r := fun x => min (h.convergenceR δ' C x) (HJi.convergenceR δ' C x)
have hJd : J.distortion ≤ C := le_trans (Finset.le_sup hJ) (le_max_left _ _)
rcases l.exists_memBaseSet_isPartition J hJd r with ⟨πJ, hC, hp⟩
have hC₁ : l.MemBaseSet J C (HJi.convergenceR δ' C) πJ := by
refine hC.mono J le_rfl le_rfl fun x _ => ?_; exact min_le_right _ _
have hC₂ : l.MemBaseSet J C (h.convergenceR δ' C) πJ := by
refine hC.mono J le_rfl le_rfl fun x _ => ?_; exact min_le_left _ _
exact ⟨πJ, hp, HJi.dist_integralSum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet δ'0 hC₁ hp, hC₂⟩
/- Now we combine these tagged partitions into a tagged prepartition of `I` that covers the
same part of `I` as `π₀` and apply `BoxIntegral.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet` to
`π` and this prepartition. -/
choose! πi hπip hπiδ' hπiC using this
have : l.MemBaseSet I C (h.convergenceR δ' C) (π₀.biUnionTagged πi) :=
biUnionTagged_memBaseSet hπiC hπip fun _ => le_max_right _ _
have hU' : π.iUnion = (π₀.biUnionTagged πi).iUnion :=
hU.trans (Prepartition.iUnion_biUnion_partition _ hπip).symm
have := h.dist_integralSum_le_of_memBaseSet h0 δ'0 hπ this hU'
rw [integralSum_biUnionTagged] at this
calc
dist (integralSum f vol π) (∑ J ∈ π₀.boxes, integral J l f vol) ≤
dist (integralSum f vol π) (∑ J ∈ π₀.boxes, integralSum f vol (πi J)) +
dist (∑ J ∈ π₀.boxes, integralSum f vol (πi J)) (∑ J ∈ π₀.boxes, integral J l f vol) :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε + δ' + ∑ _J ∈ π₀.boxes, δ' := add_le_add this (dist_sum_sum_le_of_le _ hπiδ')
_ = ε + δ := by field_simp [δ']; ring
/-- **Henstock-Sacks inequality**. Let `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` be a function such that for any tagged
*partition* of `I` subordinate to `r`, the integral sum of `f` over this partition differs from the
integral of `f` by at most `ε`. Then for any tagged *prepartition* `π` subordinate to `r`, the
integral sum of `f` over this prepartition differs from the integral of `f` over the part of `I`
covered by `π` by at most `ε`.
The actual statement
- uses `BoxIntegral.Integrable.convergenceR` instead of a predicate assumption on `r`;
- uses `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet` instead of “subordinate to `r`” to
account for additional requirements like being a Henstock partition or having a bounded
distortion;
-/
theorem dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet (h : Integrable I l f vol) (h0 : 0 < ε)
(hπ : l.MemBaseSet I c (h.convergenceR ε c) π) :
dist (integralSum f vol π) (∑ J ∈ π.boxes, integral J l f vol) ≤ ε :=
h.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq h0 hπ rfl
/-- Integral sum of `f` over a tagged prepartition `π` such that `π.Union = π₀.Union` tends to the
sum of integrals of `f` over the boxes of `π₀`. -/
theorem tendsto_integralSum_sum_integral (h : Integrable I l f vol) (π₀ : Prepartition I) :
Tendsto (integralSum f vol) (l.toFilteriUnion I π₀)
(𝓝 <| ∑ J ∈ π₀.boxes, integral J l f vol) := by
refine ((l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion I π₀).tendsto_iff nhds_basis_closedBall).2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
refine ⟨h.convergenceR ε, h.convergenceR_cond ε, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_setOf_eq]
rintro π ⟨c, hc, hU⟩
exact h.dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet_of_iUnion_eq ε0 hc hU
/-- If `f` is integrable on `I`, then `fun J ↦ integral J l f vol` is box-additive on subboxes of
`I`: if `π₁`, `π₂` are two prepartitions of `I` covering the same part of `I`, the sum of integrals
of `f` over the boxes of `π₁` is equal to the sum of integrals of `f` over the boxes of `π₂`.
See also `BoxIntegral.Integrable.toBoxAdditive` for a bundled version. -/
theorem sum_integral_congr (h : Integrable I l f vol) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}
(hU : π₁.iUnion = π₂.iUnion) :
∑ J ∈ π₁.boxes, integral J l f vol = ∑ J ∈ π₂.boxes, integral J l f vol := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (h.tendsto_integralSum_sum_integral π₁) ?_
rw [l.toFilteriUnion_congr _ hU]
exact h.tendsto_integralSum_sum_integral π₂
/-- If `f` is integrable on `I`, then `fun J ↦ integral J l f vol` is box-additive on subboxes of
`I`: if `π₁`, `π₂` are two prepartitions of `I` covering the same part of `I`, the sum of integrals
of `f` over the boxes of `π₁` is equal to the sum of integrals of `f` over the boxes of `π₂`.
See also `BoxIntegral.Integrable.sum_integral_congr` for an unbundled version. -/
@[simps]
def toBoxAdditive (h : Integrable I l f vol) : ι →ᵇᵃ[I] F where
toFun J := integral J l f vol
sum_partition_boxes' J hJ π hπ := by
replace hπ := hπ.iUnion_eq; rw [← Prepartition.iUnion_top] at hπ
rw [(h.to_subbox (WithTop.coe_le_coe.1 hJ)).sum_integral_congr hπ, Prepartition.top_boxes,
sum_singleton]
end Integrable
open MeasureTheory
/-!
### Integrability conditions
-/
open Prepartition EMetric ENNReal BoxAdditiveMap Finset Metric TaggedPrepartition
variable (l)
/-- A function that is bounded and a.e. continuous on a box `I` is integrable on `I`. -/
theorem integrable_of_bounded_and_ae_continuousWithinAt [CompleteSpace E] {I : Box ι} {f : ℝⁿ → E}
(hb : ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) (μ : Measure ℝⁿ) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(hc : ∀ᵐ x ∂(μ.restrict (Box.Icc I)), ContinuousWithinAt f (Box.Icc I) x) :
Integrable I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul := by
/- We prove that f is integrable by proving that we can ensure that the integrals over any
two tagged prepartitions π₁ and π₂ can be made ε-close by making the partitions
sufficiently fine.
Start by defining some constants C, ε₁, ε₂ that will be useful later. -/
refine integrable_iff_cauchy_basis.2 fun ε ε0 ↦ ?_
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε0 (2 * μ.toBoxAdditive I) with ⟨ε₁, ε₁0, hε₁⟩
rcases hb with ⟨C, hC⟩
have C0 : 0 ≤ C := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := BoxIntegral.Box.nonempty_coe I
exact le_trans (norm_nonneg (f x)) <| hC x (I.coe_subset_Icc hx)
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε0 (4 * C) with ⟨ε₂, ε₂0, hε₂⟩
have ε₂0' : ENNReal.ofReal ε₂ ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt <| ofReal_pos.2 ε₂0
-- The set of discontinuities of f is contained in an open set U with μ U < ε₂.
let D := { x ∈ Box.Icc I | ¬ ContinuousWithinAt f (Box.Icc I) x }
let μ' := μ.restrict (Box.Icc I)
have μ'D : μ' D = 0 := by
rcases eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hc with ⟨V, ae, hV⟩
exact eq_of_le_of_not_lt (mem_ae_iff.1 ae ▸ (μ'.mono <| fun x h xV ↦ h.2 (hV x xV))) not_lt_zero
obtain ⟨U, UD, Uopen, hU⟩ := Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add D (show μ' D ≠ ⊤ by simp [μ'D]) ε₂0'
rw [μ'D, zero_add] at hU
/- Box.Icc I \ U is compact and avoids discontinuities of f, so there exists r > 0 such that for
every x ∈ Box.Icc I \ U, the oscillation (within Box.Icc I) of f on the ball of radius r
centered at x is ≤ ε₁ -/
have comp : IsCompact (Box.Icc I \ U) :=
I.isCompact_Icc.of_isClosed_subset (I.isCompact_Icc.isClosed.sdiff Uopen) Set.diff_subset
have : ∀ x ∈ (Box.Icc I \ U), oscillationWithin f (Box.Icc I) x < (ENNReal.ofReal ε₁) := by
intro x hx
suffices oscillationWithin f (Box.Icc I) x = 0 by rw [this]; exact ofReal_pos.2 ε₁0
simpa [OscillationWithin.eq_zero_iff_continuousWithinAt, D, hx.1] using hx.2 ∘ (fun a ↦ UD a)
rcases comp.uniform_oscillationWithin this with ⟨r, r0, hr⟩
/- We prove the claim for partitions π₁ and π₂ subordinate to r/2, by writing the difference as
an integralSum over π₁ ⊓ π₂ and considering separately the boxes of π₁ ⊓ π₂ which are/aren't
fully contained within U. -/
refine ⟨fun _ _ ↦ ⟨r / 2, half_pos r0⟩, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl, fun c₁ c₂ π₁ π₂ h₁ h₁p h₂ h₂p ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [dist_eq_norm, integralSum_sub_partitions _ _ h₁p h₂p, toSMul_apply, ← smul_sub]
have μI : μ I < ⊤ := lt_of_le_of_lt (μ.mono I.coe_subset_Icc) I.isCompact_Icc.measure_lt_top
let t₁ (J : Box ι) : ℝⁿ := (π₁.infPrepartition π₂.toPrepartition).tag J
let t₂ (J : Box ι) : ℝⁿ := (π₂.infPrepartition π₁.toPrepartition).tag J
let B := (π₁.toPrepartition ⊓ π₂.toPrepartition).boxes
classical
let B' := {J ∈ B | J.toSet ⊆ U}
have hB' : B' ⊆ B := B.filter_subset (fun J ↦ J.toSet ⊆ U)
have μJ_ne_top : ∀ J ∈ B, μ J ≠ ⊤ :=
fun J hJ ↦ lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (μ.mono (Prepartition.le_of_mem' _ J hJ)) μI
have un : ∀ S ⊆ B, ⋃ J ∈ S, J.toSet ⊆ I.toSet :=
fun S hS ↦ iUnion_subset_iff.2 (fun J ↦ iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun hJ ↦ le_of_mem' _ J (hS hJ))
rw [← sum_sdiff hB', ← add_halves ε]
apply le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) (add_le_add ?_ ?_)
/- If a box J is not contained within U, then the oscillation of f on J is small, which bounds
the contribution of J to the overall sum. -/
· have : ∀ J ∈ B \ B', ‖μ.toBoxAdditive J • (f (t₁ J) - f (t₂ J))‖ ≤ μ.toBoxAdditive J * ε₁ := by
intro J hJ
rw [mem_sdiff, B.mem_filter, not_and] at hJ
rw [norm_smul, μ.toBoxAdditive_apply, Real.norm_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ toReal_nonneg
obtain ⟨x, xJ, xnU⟩ : ∃ x ∈ J, x ∉ U := Set.not_subset.1 (hJ.2 hJ.1)
have hx : x ∈ Box.Icc I \ U := ⟨Box.coe_subset_Icc ((le_of_mem' _ J hJ.1) xJ), xnU⟩
have ineq : edist (f (t₁ J)) (f (t₂ J)) ≤ EMetric.diam (f '' (ball x r ∩ (Box.Icc I))) := by
apply edist_le_diam_of_mem <;>
refine Set.mem_image_of_mem f ⟨?_, tag_mem_Icc _ J⟩ <;>
refine closedBall_subset_ball (div_two_lt_of_pos r0) <| mem_closedBall_comm.1 ?_
· exact h₁.isSubordinate.infPrepartition π₂.toPrepartition J hJ.1 (Box.coe_subset_Icc xJ)
· exact h₂.isSubordinate.infPrepartition π₁.toPrepartition J
((π₁.mem_infPrepartition_comm).1 hJ.1) (Box.coe_subset_Icc xJ)
rw [← emetric_ball] at ineq
simpa only [edist_le_ofReal (le_of_lt ε₁0), dist_eq_norm, hJ.1] using ineq.trans (hr x hx)
refine (norm_sum_le _ _).trans <| (sum_le_sum this).trans ?_
rw [← sum_mul]
trans μ.toBoxAdditive I * ε₁; swap
· linarith
simp_rw [mul_le_mul_right ε₁0, μ.toBoxAdditive_apply]
refine le_trans ?_ <| toReal_mono (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 μI) <| μ.mono <| un (B \ B') sdiff_subset
simp_rw [measureReal_def]
rw [← toReal_sum (fun J hJ ↦ μJ_ne_top J (mem_sdiff.1 hJ).1), ← Finset.tsum_subtype]
refine (toReal_mono <| ne_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (μ.mono <| un (B \ B') sdiff_subset) μI) ?_
refine le_of_eq (measure_biUnion (countable_toSet _) ?_ (fun J _ ↦ J.measurableSet_coe)).symm
exact fun J hJ J' hJ' hJJ' ↦ pairwiseDisjoint _ (mem_sdiff.1 hJ).1 (mem_sdiff.1 hJ').1 hJJ'
-- The contribution of the boxes contained within U is bounded because f is bounded and μ U < ε₂.
· have : ∀ J ∈ B', ‖μ.toBoxAdditive J • (f (t₁ J) - f (t₂ J))‖ ≤ μ.toBoxAdditive J * (2 * C) := by
intro J _
rw [norm_smul, μ.toBoxAdditive_apply, Real.norm_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg, two_mul]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_trans (norm_sub_le _ _) (add_le_add ?_ ?_)) (by simp) <;>
exact hC _ (TaggedPrepartition.tag_mem_Icc _ J)
apply (norm_sum_le_of_le B' this).trans
simp_rw [← sum_mul, μ.toBoxAdditive_apply, measureReal_def,
← toReal_sum (fun J hJ ↦ μJ_ne_top J (hB' hJ))]
suffices (∑ J ∈ B', μ J).toReal ≤ ε₂ by
linarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right this <| (mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left two_pos).2 C0]
rw [← toReal_ofReal (le_of_lt ε₂0)]
refine toReal_mono ofReal_ne_top (le_trans ?_ (le_of_lt hU))
trans μ' (⋃ J ∈ B', J)
· simp only [μ', μ.restrict_eq_self <| (un _ hB').trans I.coe_subset_Icc]
exact le_of_eq <| Eq.symm <| measure_biUnion_finset
(fun J hJ K hK hJK ↦ pairwiseDisjoint _ (hB' hJ) (hB' hK) hJK) fun J _ ↦ J.measurableSet_coe
· apply μ'.mono
simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
exact fun J hJ ↦ (mem_filter.1 hJ).2
/-- A function that is bounded on a box `I` and a.e. continuous is integrable on `I`.
This is a version of `integrable_of_bounded_and_ae_continuousWithinAt` with a stronger continuity
assumption so that the user does not need to specialize the continuity assumption to each box on
which the theorem is to be applied. -/
theorem integrable_of_bounded_and_ae_continuous [CompleteSpace E] {I : Box ι} {f : ℝⁿ → E}
(hb : ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) (μ : Measure ℝⁿ) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(hc : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ContinuousAt f x) : Integrable I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul :=
integrable_of_bounded_and_ae_continuousWithinAt l hb μ <|
Eventually.filter_mono (ae_mono μ.restrict_le_self) (hc.mono fun _ h ↦ h.continuousWithinAt)
/-- A continuous function is box-integrable with respect to any locally finite measure.
This is true for any volume with bounded variation. -/
theorem integrable_of_continuousOn [CompleteSpace E] {I : Box ι} {f : ℝⁿ → E}
(hc : ContinuousOn f (Box.Icc I)) (μ : Measure ℝⁿ) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] :
Integrable.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul := by
apply integrable_of_bounded_and_ae_continuousWithinAt
· obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := (NormedSpace.isBounded_iff_subset_smul_closedBall ℝ).1
(I.isCompact_Icc.image_of_continuousOn hc).isBounded
use ‖C‖, fun x hx ↦ by
simpa only [smul_unitClosedBall, mem_closedBall_zero_iff] using hC (Set.mem_image_of_mem f hx)
· refine eventually_of_mem ?_ (fun x hx ↦ hc.continuousWithinAt hx)
rw [mem_ae_iff, μ.restrict_apply] <;> simp [MeasurableSet.compl_iff.2 I.measurableSet_Icc]
variable {l}
/-- This is an auxiliary lemma used to prove two statements at once. Use one of the next two
lemmas instead. -/
theorem HasIntegral.of_bRiemann_eq_false_of_forall_isLittleO (hl : l.bRiemann = false)
(B : ι →ᵇᵃ[I] ℝ) (hB0 : ∀ J, 0 ≤ B J) (g : ι →ᵇᵃ[I] F) (s : Set ℝⁿ) (hs : s.Countable)
(hlH : s.Nonempty → l.bHenstock = true)
(H₁ : ∀ (c : ℝ≥0), ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I ∩ s, ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ),
∃ δ > 0, ∀ J ≤ I, Box.Icc J ⊆ Metric.closedBall x δ → x ∈ Box.Icc J →
(l.bDistortion → J.distortion ≤ c) → dist (vol J (f x)) (g J) ≤ ε)
(H₂ : ∀ (c : ℝ≥0), ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I \ s, ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ),
∃ δ > 0, ∀ J ≤ I, Box.Icc J ⊆ Metric.closedBall x δ → (l.bHenstock → x ∈ Box.Icc J) →
(l.bDistortion → J.distortion ≤ c) → dist (vol J (f x)) (g J) ≤ ε * B J) :
HasIntegral I l f vol (g I) := by
/- We choose `r x` differently for `x ∈ s` and `x ∉ s`.
For `x ∈ s`, we choose `εs` such that `∑' x : s, εs x < ε / 2 / 2 ^ #ι`, then choose `r x` so
that `dist (vol J (f x)) (g J) ≤ εs x` for `J` in the `r x`-neighborhood of `x`. This guarantees
that the sum of these distances over boxes `J` such that `π.tag J ∈ s` is less than `ε / 2`. We
need an additional multiplier `2 ^ #ι` because different boxes can have the same tag.
For `x ∉ s`, we choose `r x` so that `dist (vol (J (f x))) (g J) ≤ (ε / 2 / B I) * B J` for a
box `J` in the `δ`-neighborhood of `x`. -/
refine ((l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion_top _).tendsto_iff Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall).2 ?_
intro ε ε0
simp only [← exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, Subtype.exists'] at H₁ H₂
choose! δ₁ Hδ₁ using H₁
choose! δ₂ Hδ₂ using H₂
have ε0' := half_pos ε0; have H0 : 0 < (2 : ℝ) ^ Fintype.card ι := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
rcases hs.exists_pos_forall_sum_le (div_pos ε0' H0) with ⟨εs, hεs0, hεs⟩
simp only [le_div_iff₀' H0, mul_sum] at hεs
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε0' (B I) with ⟨ε', ε'0, hεI⟩
classical
set δ : ℝ≥0 → ℝⁿ → Ioi (0 : ℝ) := fun c x => if x ∈ s then δ₁ c x (εs x) else (δ₂ c) x ε'
refine ⟨δ, fun c => l.rCond_of_bRiemann_eq_false hl, ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, mem_setOf_eq]
rintro π ⟨c, hπδ, hπp⟩
-- Now we split the sum into two parts based on whether `π.tag J` belongs to `s` or not.
rw [← g.sum_partition_boxes le_rfl hπp, Metric.mem_closedBall, integralSum,
← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not π.boxes fun J => π.tag J ∈ s,
← sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not π.boxes fun J => π.tag J ∈ s, ← add_halves ε]
refine dist_add_add_le_of_le ?_ ?_
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hsne); · simp [ε0'.le]
/- For the boxes such that `π.tag J ∈ s`, we use the fact that at most `2 ^ #ι` boxes have the
same tag. -/
specialize hlH hsne
have : ∀ J ∈ {J ∈ π.boxes | π.tag J ∈ s},
dist (vol J (f <| π.tag J)) (g J) ≤ εs (π.tag J) := fun J hJ ↦ by
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hJ; obtain ⟨hJ, hJs⟩ := hJ
refine Hδ₁ c _ ⟨π.tag_mem_Icc _, hJs⟩ _ (hεs0 _) _ (π.le_of_mem' _ hJ) ?_
(hπδ.2 hlH J hJ) fun hD => (Finset.le_sup hJ).trans (hπδ.3 hD)
convert hπδ.1 J hJ using 3; exact (if_pos hJs).symm
refine (dist_sum_sum_le_of_le _ this).trans ?_
rw [sum_comp]
refine (sum_le_sum ?_).trans (hεs _ ?_)
· rintro b -
rw [← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_pow, ← nsmul_eq_mul]
| refine nsmul_le_nsmul_left (hεs0 _).le ?_
refine (Finset.card_le_card ?_).trans ((hπδ.isHenstock hlH).card_filter_tag_eq_le b)
exact filter_subset_filter _ (filter_subset _ _)
· rw [Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
exact fun J hJ => (Finset.mem_filter.1 hJ).2
/- Now we deal with boxes such that `π.tag J ∉ s`.
In this case the estimate is straightforward. -/
calc
dist (∑ J ∈ π.boxes with ¬tag π J ∈ s, vol J (f (tag π J)))
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes with ¬tag π J ∈ s, g J)
≤ ∑ J ∈ π.boxes with ¬tag π J ∈ s, ε' * B J := dist_sum_sum_le_of_le _ fun J hJ ↦ by
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hJ; obtain ⟨hJ, hJs⟩ := hJ
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Basic.lean | 812 | 823 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for monoid and group structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for `Monoid` and higher algebraic structures with one
binary operation. Extensionality lemmas for structures that are lower in the hierarchy can be found
in `Algebra.Group.Defs`.
## Implementation details
To get equality of `npow` etc, we define a monoid homomorphism between two monoid structures on the
same type, then apply lemmas like `MonoidHom.map_div`, `MonoidHom.map_pow` etc.
To refer to the `*` operator of a particular instance `i`, we use
`(letI := i; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)` instead of `i.mul` (which elaborates to `Mul.mul`), as the
former uses `HMul.hMul` which is the canonical spelling.
## Tags
monoid, group, extensionality
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem Monoid.ext {M : Type u} ⦃m₁ m₂ : Monoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ := by
| have : m₁.toMulOneClass = m₂.toMulOneClass := MulOneClass.ext h_mul
have h₁ : m₁.one = m₂.one := congr_arg (·.one) this
let f : @MonoidHom M M m₁.toMulOneClass m₂.toMulOneClass :=
@MonoidHom.mk _ _ (_) _ (@OneHom.mk _ _ (_) _ id h₁)
(fun x y => congr_fun (congr_fun h_mul x) y)
have : m₁.npow = m₂.npow := by
ext n x
exact @MonoidHom.map_pow M M m₁ m₂ f x n
rcases m₁ with @⟨@⟨⟨_⟩⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
rcases m₂ with @⟨@⟨⟨_⟩⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean | 38 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Dart
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Fintype
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Set
/-!
# Maps between graphs
This file defines two functions and three structures relating graphs.
The structures directly correspond to the classification of functions as
injective, surjective and bijective, and have corresponding notation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.map`: the graph obtained by pushing the adjacency relation through
an injective function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.comap`: the graph obtained by pulling the adjacency relation behind
an arbitrary function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.induce`: the subgraph induced by the given vertex set, a wrapper around `comap`.
* `SimpleGraph.spanningCoe`: the supergraph without any additional edges, a wrapper around `map`.
* `SimpleGraph.Hom`, `G →g H`: a graph homomorphism from `G` to `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Embedding`, `G ↪g H`: a graph embedding of `G` in `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Iso`, `G ≃g H`: a graph isomorphism between `G` and `H`.
Note that a graph embedding is a stronger notion than an injective graph homomorphism,
since its image is an induced subgraph.
## Implementation notes
Morphisms of graphs are abbreviations for `RelHom`, `RelEmbedding` and `RelIso`.
To make use of pre-existing simp lemmas, definitions involving morphisms are
abbreviations as well.
-/
open Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V W X : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) {u v : V}
/-! ## Map and comap -/
/-- Given an injective function, there is a covariant induced map on graphs by pushing forward
the adjacency relation.
This is injective (see `SimpleGraph.map_injective`). -/
protected def map (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : SimpleGraph W where
Adj := Relation.Map G.Adj f f
symm a b := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, rfl⟩
use w, v, h.symm, rfl
loopless a := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, h'⟩
exact h.ne (f.injective h'.symm)
instance instDecidableMapAdj {f : V ↪ W} {a b} [Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)] :
Decidable ((G.map f).Adj a b) := ‹Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)›
@[simp]
theorem map_adj (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (u v : W) :
(G.map f).Adj u v ↔ ∃ u' v' : V, G.Adj u' v' ∧ f u' = u ∧ f v' = v :=
Iff.rfl
lemma map_adj_apply {G : SimpleGraph V} {f : V ↪ W} {a b : V} :
(G.map f).Adj (f a) (f b) ↔ G.Adj a b := by simp
theorem map_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.map f) := by
rintro G G' h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, h ha, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id : G.map (Function.Embedding.refl _) = G :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_id_id _
@[simp] lemma map_map (f : V ↪ W) (g : W ↪ X) : (G.map f).map g = G.map (f.trans g) :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_map _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given a function, there is a contravariant induced map on graphs by pulling back the
adjacency relation.
This is one of the ways of creating induced graphs. See `SimpleGraph.induce` for a wrapper.
This is surjective when `f` is injective (see `SimpleGraph.comap_surjective`). -/
protected def comap (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj u v := G.Adj (f u) (f v)
symm _ _ h := h.symm
loopless _ := G.loopless _
@[simp] lemma comap_adj {G : SimpleGraph W} {f : V → W} :
(G.comap f).Adj u v ↔ G.Adj (f u) (f v) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id {G : SimpleGraph V} : G.comap id = G := SimpleGraph.ext rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_comap {G : SimpleGraph X} (f : V → W) (g : W → X) :
(G.comap g).comap f = G.comap (g ∘ f) := rfl
instance instDecidableComapAdj (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidableRel (G.comap f).Adj := fun _ _ ↦ ‹DecidableRel G.Adj› _ _
lemma comap_symm (G : SimpleGraph V) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.comap e.symm.toEmbedding = G.map e.toEmbedding := by
ext; simp only [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, comap_adj, map_adj, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply,
exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right]
lemma map_symm (G : SimpleGraph W) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.map e.symm.toEmbedding = G.comap e.toEmbedding := by rw [← comap_symm, e.symm_symm]
theorem comap_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.comap f) := by
intro G G' h _ _ ha
exact h ha
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_eq (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : (G.map f).comap f = G := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_comap_map (f : V ↪ W) :
Function.LeftInverse (SimpleGraph.comap f) (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
| comap_map_eq f
theorem map_injective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Injective (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Maps.lean | 123 | 125 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
lemma nontrivial_iff {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (ZMod n) ↔ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, subsingleton_iff]
-- todo: this can be made a `Unique` instance.
instance subsingleton_units : Subsingleton (ZMod 2)ˣ :=
⟨by decide⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} :
a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Nat.odd_iff, ← Nat.two_dvd_ne_zero, ← Nat.prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd] at hn
rw [← mul_two, ← @Nat.cast_two (ZMod n), ← ZMod.coe_unitOfCoprime 2 hn, Units.mul_left_eq_zero]
theorem ne_neg_self {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a := by
rwa [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero hn]
theorem neg_one_ne_one {n : ℕ} [Fact (2 < n)] : (-1 : ZMod n) ≠ 1 :=
CharP.neg_one_ne_one (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_mod_two (a : ZMod 2) : -a = a := by
fin_cases a <;> apply Fin.ext <;> simp [Fin.coe_neg, Int.natMod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem natAbs_mod_two (a : ℤ) : (a.natAbs : ZMod 2) = a := by
cases a
· simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, Int.ofNat_eq_coe]
· simp only [neg_eq_self_mod_two, Nat.cast_succ, Int.natAbs, Int.cast_negSucc]
theorem val_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(val_eq_zero a).not
theorem val_pos {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} : 0 < a.val ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem val_eq_one : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : 1 < n) (a : ZMod n), a.val = 1 ↔ a = 1
| 0, hn, _
| 1, hn, _ => by simp at hn
| n + 2, _, _ => by simp only [val, ZMod, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_one]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ 2 * a.val = n := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← two_mul]
cases n
· rw [@mul_eq_zero ℤ, @mul_eq_zero ℕ, val_eq_zero]
exact
⟨fun h => h.elim (by simp) Or.inl, fun h =>
Or.inr (h.elim id fun h => h.elim (by simp) id)⟩
conv_lhs =>
rw [← a.natCast_zmod_val, ← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_mul, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨m, he⟩
rcases m with - | m
· rw [mul_zero, mul_eq_zero] at he
rcases he with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | he)
exact Or.inl (a.val_eq_zero.1 he)
cases m
· right
rwa [show 0 + 1 = 1 from rfl, mul_one] at he
refine (a.val_lt.not_le <| Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ zero_lt_two).elim
rw [he, mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
simp
· rintro (rfl | h)
· rw [val_zero, mul_zero]
apply dvd_zero
· rw [h]
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_cast_zmod_lt {m : ℕ} [NeZero m] (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ZMod m) :
(a.cast : ZMod n).val < m := by
rcases m with (⟨⟩|⟨m⟩); · cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
by_cases h : m < n
· rcases n with (⟨⟩|⟨n⟩); · simp at h
rw [← natCast_val, val_cast_of_lt]
· apply a.val_lt
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (ZMod.val_lt a)) h
· rw [not_lt] at h
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (ZMod.val_lt _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_succ m))
theorem neg_val' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = (n - a.val) % n :=
calc
(-a).val = val (-a) % n := by rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (-a).val_lt]
_ = (n - val a) % n :=
Nat.ModEq.add_right_cancel' (val a)
(by
rw [Nat.ModEq, ← val_add, neg_add_cancel, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a.val_le, Nat.mod_self,
val_zero])
theorem neg_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = if a = 0 then 0 else n - a.val := by
rw [neg_val']
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [if_pos h, h, val_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.mod_self]
rw [if_neg h]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
apply Nat.sub_lt (NeZero.pos n)
contrapose! h
rwa [Nat.le_zero, val_eq_zero] at h
theorem val_neg_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [nz : NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) [na : NeZero a] :
(- a).val = n - a.val := by simp_all [neg_val a, na.out]
theorem val_sub {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : b.val ≤ a.val) :
(a - b).val = a.val - b.val := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· cases hb; simp
· have : NeZero b := ⟨hb⟩
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, val_add, val_neg_of_ne_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (le_of_lt (val_lt _)),
add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.add_mod_left]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_of_lt (val_lt _))
theorem val_cast_eq_val_of_lt {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] {a : ZMod m}
(h : a.val < n) : (a.cast : ZMod n).val = a.val := by
have nzn : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => cases nzn; simp_all
| succ n => exact Fin.val_cast_of_lt h
theorem cast_cast_zmod_of_le {m n : ℕ} [hm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast (cast a : ZMod n) : ZMod m) = a := by
have : NeZero n := ⟨((Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hm.out).trans_le h).ne'⟩
rw [cast_eq_val, val_cast_eq_val_of_lt (a.val_lt.trans_le h), natCast_zmod_val]
theorem val_pow {m n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} [ilt : Fact (1 < n)] (h : a.val ^ m < n) :
(a ^ m).val = a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
have : a.val ^ m < n := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· by_cases hm : m = 0
· cases hm; simp [ilt.out]
· simp only [val_zero, ne_eq, hm, not_false_eq_true, zero_pow, Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h]
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by rwa [gt_iff_lt, ZMod.val_pos]) (Nat.le_succ m)) h
rw [pow_succ, ZMod.val_mul, ih this, ← pow_succ, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_pow_le {m n : ℕ} [Fact (1 < n)] {a : ZMod n} : (a ^ m).val ≤ a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
apply le_trans (ZMod.val_mul_le _ _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ ih
theorem natAbs_min_of_le_div_two (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) (he : (x : ZMod n) = y) (hl : x.natAbs ≤ n / 2) :
x.natAbs ≤ y.natAbs := by
rw [intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub] at he
obtain ⟨m, he⟩ := he
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at he
subst he
obtain rfl | hm := eq_or_ne m 0
· rw [mul_zero, zero_add]
apply hl.trans
rw [← add_le_add_iff_right x.natAbs]
refine le_trans (le_trans ((add_le_add_iff_left _).2 hl) ?_) (Int.natAbs_sub_le _ _)
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast]
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| Int.natAbs_pos.2 hm)
rw [← mul_two]; apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
end ZMod
theorem RingHom.ext_zmod {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R] (f g : ZMod n →+* R) : f = g := by
ext a
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective a
let φ : ℤ →+* R := f.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
let ψ : ℤ →+* R := g.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
show φ k = ψ k
rw [φ.ext_int ψ]
namespace ZMod
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
instance subsingleton_ringHom [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n →+* R) :=
⟨RingHom.ext_zmod⟩
instance subsingleton_ringEquiv [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n ≃+* R) :=
⟨fun f g => by
rw [RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_inj_iff]
apply RingHom.ext_zmod _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem ringHom_map_cast [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) (k : ZMod n) : f (cast k) = k := by
cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast] at f k ⊢; simp
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [map_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` has a right inverse. -/
theorem ringHom_rightInverse [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) :
Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → R) f :=
ringHom_map_cast f
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` is surjective. -/
theorem ringHom_surjective [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) : Function.Surjective f :=
(ringHom_rightInverse f).surjective
@[simp]
lemma castHom_self : ZMod.castHom dvd_rfl (ZMod n) = RingHom.id (ZMod n) :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp]
lemma castHom_comp {m d : ℕ} (hm : n ∣ m) (hd : m ∣ d) :
(castHom hm (ZMod n)).comp (castHom hd (ZMod m)) = castHom (dvd_trans hm hd) (ZMod n) :=
RingHom.ext_zmod _ _
section lift
variable (n) {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
/-- The map from `ZMod n` induced by `f : ℤ →+ A` that maps `n` to `0`. -/
def lift : { f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0 } ≃ (ZMod n →+ A) :=
(Equiv.subtypeEquivRight <| by
intro f
rw [ker_intCastAddHom]
constructor
· rintro hf _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [f.map_zsmul, zsmul_zero, f.mem_ker, hf]
· intro h
exact h (AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples _)).trans <|
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).liftOfRightInverse cast intCast_zmod_cast
variable (f : { f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0 })
@[simp]
theorem lift_coe (x : ℤ) : lift n f (x : ZMod n) = f.val x :=
AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ (fun _ => intCast_zmod_cast _) _ _
theorem lift_castAddHom (x : ℤ) : lift n f (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n) x) = f.1 x :=
AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ (fun _ => intCast_zmod_cast _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_coe : ZMod.lift n f ∘ ((↑) : ℤ → _) = f :=
funext <| lift_coe _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_castAddHom : (ZMod.lift n f).comp (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)) = f :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <| lift_castAddHom _ _
lemma lift_injective {f : {f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0}} :
Injective (lift n f) ↔ ∀ m, f.1 m = 0 → (m : ZMod n) = 0 := by
simp only [← AddMonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff, eq_bot_iff, SetLike.le_def,
ZMod.intCast_surjective.forall, ZMod.lift_coe, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, AddSubgroup.mem_bot]
end lift
end ZMod
/-!
### Groups of bounded torsion
For `G` a group and `n` a natural number, `G` having torsion dividing `n`
(`∀ x : G, n • x = 0`) can be derived from `Module R G` where `R` has characteristic dividing `n`.
It is however painful to have the API for such groups `G` stated in this generality, as `R` does not
appear anywhere in the lemmas' return type. Instead of writing the API in terms of a general `R`, we
therefore specialise to the canonical ring of order `n`, namely `ZMod n`.
This spelling `Module (ZMod n) G` has the extra advantage of providing the canonical action by
`ZMod n`. It is however Type-valued, so we might want to acquire a Prop-valued version in the
future.
-/
section Module
variable {n : ℕ} {S G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [AddSubgroupClass S G] {K : S} {x : G}
section general
variable [Module (ZMod n) G] {x : G}
lemma zmod_smul_mem (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ a : ZMod n, a • x ∈ K := by
simpa [ZMod.forall, Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul] using zsmul_mem hx
/-- This cannot be made an instance because of the `[Module (ZMod n) G]` argument and the fact that
`n` only appears in the second argument of `SMulMemClass`, which is an `OutParam`. -/
lemma smulMemClass : SMulMemClass S (ZMod n) G where smul_mem _ _ {_x} hx := zmod_smul_mem hx _
namespace AddSubgroupClass
instance instZModSMul : SMul (ZMod n) K where smul a x := ⟨a • x, zmod_smul_mem x.2 _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zmod_smul (a : ZMod n) (x : K) : ↑(a • x) = (a • x : G) := rfl
instance instZModModule : Module (ZMod n) K :=
Subtype.coe_injective.module _ (AddSubmonoidClass.subtype K) coe_zmod_smul
end AddSubgroupClass
variable (n)
lemma ZModModule.char_nsmul_eq_zero (x : G) : n • x = 0 := by
simp [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul (ZMod n)]
variable (G) in
lemma ZModModule.char_ne_one [Nontrivial G] : n ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : G)
exact hx <| by simpa using char_nsmul_eq_zero 1 x
variable (G) in
lemma ZModModule.two_le_char [NeZero n] [Nontrivial G] : 2 ≤ n := by
have := NeZero.ne n
have := char_ne_one n G
omega
lemma ZModModule.periodicPts_add_left [NeZero n] (x : G) : periodicPts (x + ·) = .univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun y ↦ ⟨n, NeZero.pos n, by
simpa [char_nsmul_eq_zero, IsPeriodicPt] using isFixedPt_id _⟩
end general
section two
variable [Module (ZMod 2) G]
lemma ZModModule.add_self (x : G) : x + x = 0 := by
simpa [two_nsmul] using char_nsmul_eq_zero 2 x
lemma ZModModule.neg_eq_self (x : G) : -x = x := by simp [add_self, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero]
lemma ZModModule.sub_eq_add (x y : G) : x - y = x + y := by simp [neg_eq_self, sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma ZModModule.add_add_add_cancel (x y z : G) : (x + y) + (y + z) = x + z := by
simpa [sub_eq_add] using sub_add_sub_cancel x y z
|
end two
end Module
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 1,222 | 1,224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Tangent cone
In this file, we define two predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x` and `UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s`
ensuring that, if a function has two derivatives, then they have to coincide. As a direct
definition of this fact (quantifying on all target types and all functions) would depend on
universes, we use a more intrinsic definition: if all the possible tangent directions to the set
`s` at the point `x` span a dense subset of the whole subset, it is easy to check that the
derivative has to be unique.
Therefore, we introduce the set of all tangent directions, named `tangentConeAt`,
and express `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` in terms of it.
One should however think of this definition as an implementation detail: the only reason to
introduce the predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` is to ensure the uniqueness
of the derivative. This is why their names reflect their uses, and not how they are defined.
## Implementation details
Note that this file is imported by `Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`. Hence, derivatives are
not defined yet. The property of uniqueness of the derivative is therefore proved in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`, but based on the properties of the tangent cone we prove
here.
-/
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
open Filter Set Metric
open scoped Topology Pointwise
section TangentCone
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
/-- The set of all tangent directions to the set `s` at the point `x`. -/
def tangentConeAt (s : Set E) (x : E) : Set E :=
{ y : E | ∃ (c : ℕ → 𝕜) (d : ℕ → E),
(∀ᶠ n in atTop, x + d n ∈ s) ∧
Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) atTop atTop ∧
Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) atTop (𝓝 y) }
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at `x` spans a dense subset of the whole space.
The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential within `s` at `x` is unique,
hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq` in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`.
To avoid pathologies in dimension 0, we also require that `x` belongs to the closure of `s` (which
is automatic when `E` is not `0`-dimensional). -/
@[mk_iff]
structure UniqueDiffWithinAt (s : Set E) (x : E) : Prop where
dense_tangentConeAt : Dense (Submodule.span 𝕜 (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) : Set E)
mem_closure : x ∈ closure s
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias UniqueDiffWithinAt.dense_tangentCone := UniqueDiffWithinAt.dense_tangentConeAt
/-- A property ensuring that the tangent cone to `s` at any of its points spans a dense subset of
the whole space. The main role of this property is to ensure that the differential along `s` is
unique, hence this name. The uniqueness it asserts is proved in `UniqueDiffOn.eq` in
`Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic`. -/
def UniqueDiffOn (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
end TangentCone
variable {𝕜}
variable {E F G : Type*}
section TangentCone
-- This section is devoted to the properties of the tangent cone.
open NormedField
section TVS
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {x y : E} {s t : Set E}
theorem mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul {r : 𝕜} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr : ‖r‖ < 1)
(hs : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + r ^ n • y ∈ s) : y ∈ tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x := by
refine ⟨fun n ↦ (r ^ n)⁻¹, fun n ↦ r ^ n • y, hs, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [norm_inv, norm_pow, ← inv_pow]
exact tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt <| (one_lt_inv₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hr₀)).2 hr
· simp only [inv_smul_smul₀ (pow_ne_zero _ hr₀), tendsto_const_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem tangentConeAt_univ : tangentConeAt 𝕜 univ x = univ :=
let ⟨_r, hr₀, hr⟩ := exists_norm_lt_one 𝕜
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ mem_tangentConeAt_of_pow_smul (norm_pos_iff.1 hr₀) hr <|
| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ mem_univ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias tangentCone_univ := tangentConeAt_univ
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/TangentCone.lean | 98 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Mario Carneiro, Robert Y. Lewis, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
/-!
# `rify` tactic
The `rify` tactic is used to shift propositions from `ℕ`, `ℤ` or `ℚ` to `ℝ`.
Although less useful than its cousins `zify` and `qify`, it can be useful when your
goal or context already involves real numbers.
In the example below, assumption `hn` is about natural numbers, `hk` is about integers
and involves casting a natural number to `ℤ`, and the conclusion is about real numbers.
The proof uses `rify` to lift both assumptions to `ℝ` before calling `linarith`.
```
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Rify
example {n : ℕ} {k : ℤ} (hn : 8 ≤ n) (hk : 2 * k ≤ n + 2) :
(0 : ℝ) < n - k - 1 := by
rify at hn hk
linarith
```
TODO: Investigate whether we should generalize this to other fields.
-/
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.Rify
open Lean
open Lean.Meta
open Lean.Parser.Tactic
open Lean.Elab.Tactic
/--
The `rify` tactic is used to shift propositions from `ℕ`, `ℤ` or `ℚ` to `ℝ`.
Although less useful than its cousins `zify` and `qify`, it can be useful when your
goal or context already involves real numbers.
In the example below, assumption `hn` is about natural numbers, `hk` is about integers
and involves casting a natural number to `ℤ`, and the conclusion is about real numbers.
The proof uses `rify` to lift both assumptions to `ℝ` before calling `linarith`.
```
example {n : ℕ} {k : ℤ} (hn : 8 ≤ n) (hk : 2 * k ≤ n + 2) :
(0 : ℝ) < n - k - 1 := by
rify at hn hk /- Now have hn : 8 ≤ (n : ℝ) hk : 2 * (k : ℝ) ≤ (n : ℝ) + 2 -/
linarith
```
`rify` makes use of the `@[zify_simps]`, `@[qify_simps]` and `@[rify_simps]` attributes to move
propositions, and the `push_cast` tactic to simplify the `ℝ`-valued expressions.
`rify` can be given extra lemmas to use in simplification. This is especially useful in the
presence of nat subtraction: passing `≤` arguments will allow `push_cast` to do more work.
```
example (a b c : ℕ) (h : a - b < c) (hab : b ≤ a) : a < b + c := by
rify [hab] at h ⊢
linarith
```
Note that `zify` or `qify` would work just as well in the above example (and `zify` is the natural
choice since it is enough to get rid of the pathological `ℕ` subtraction). -/
syntax (name := rify) "rify" (simpArgs)? (location)? : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| rify $[[$simpArgs,*]]? $[at $location]?) =>
let args := simpArgs.map (·.getElems) |>.getD #[]
`(tactic|
simp -decide only [zify_simps, qify_simps, rify_simps, push_cast, $args,*]
$[at $location]?)
| @[rify_simps] lemma ratCast_eq (a b : ℚ) : a = b ↔ (a : ℝ) = (b : ℝ) := by simp
| Mathlib/Tactic/Rify.lean | 77 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Control.EquivFunctor
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Equivalences for `Option α`
We define
* `Equiv.optionCongr`: the `Option α ≃ Option β` constructed from `e : α ≃ β` by sending `none` to
`none`, and applying `e` elsewhere.
* `Equiv.removeNone`: the `α ≃ β` constructed from `Option α ≃ Option β` by removing `none` from
both sides.
-/
universe u
namespace Equiv
open Option
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section OptionCongr
/-- A universe-polymorphic version of `EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Option α ≃ Option β where
toFun := Option.map e
invFun := Option.map e.symm
left_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.symm_comp_self.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
right_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.self_comp_symm.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_refl : optionCongr (Equiv.refl α) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext <| congr_fun Option.map_id
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) : (optionCongr e).symm = optionCongr e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) :
(optionCongr e₁).trans (optionCongr e₂) = optionCongr (e₁.trans e₂) :=
ext <| Option.map_map _ _
/-- When `α` and `β` are in the same universe, this is the same as the result of
`EquivFunctor.mapEquiv`. -/
theorem optionCongr_eq_equivFunctor_mapEquiv {α β : Type u} (e : α ≃ β) :
optionCongr e = EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e :=
rfl
end OptionCongr
section RemoveNone
variable (e : Option α ≃ Option β)
/-- If we have a value on one side of an `Equiv` of `Option`
we also have a value on the other side of the equivalence
-/
def removeNone_aux (x : α) : β :=
if h : (e (some x)).isSome then Option.get _ h
else
Option.get _ <|
show (e none).isSome by
rw [← Option.ne_none_iff_isSome]
intro hn
rw [Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none, ← hn] at h
exact Option.some_ne_none _ (e.injective h)
theorem removeNone_aux_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e (some x) := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.isSome_iff_exists.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e none := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_inv (x : α) : removeNone_aux e.symm (removeNone_aux e x) = x :=
Option.some_injective _
(by
cases h1 : e.symm (some (removeNone_aux e x)) <;> cases h2 : e (some x)
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h1]
exact (e.eq_symm_apply.mpr h2).symm
· rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h2⟩] at h1
simp at h1
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h2] at h1
simp at h1
· rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h1⟩]
rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h2⟩]
simp)
/-- Given an equivalence between two `Option` types, eliminate `none` from that equivalence by
mapping `e.symm none` to `e none`. -/
def removeNone : α ≃ β where
toFun := removeNone_aux e
invFun := removeNone_aux e.symm
left_inv := removeNone_aux_inv e
right_inv := removeNone_aux_inv e.symm
@[simp]
theorem removeNone_symm : (removeNone e).symm = removeNone e.symm :=
rfl
theorem removeNone_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone e x) = e (some x) :=
removeNone_aux_some e h
theorem removeNone_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) : some (removeNone e x) = e none :=
removeNone_aux_none e h
@[simp]
theorem option_symm_apply_none_iff : e.symm none = none ↔ e none = none :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using (congr_arg e h).symm, fun h => by simpa using (congr_arg e.symm h).symm⟩
theorem some_removeNone_iff {x : α} : some (removeNone e x) = e none ↔ e.symm none = some x := by
rcases h : e (some x) with a | a
· rw [removeNone_none _ h]
simpa using (congr_arg e.symm h).symm
· rw [removeNone_some _ ⟨a, h⟩]
have h1 := congr_arg e.symm h
rw [symm_apply_apply] at h1
simp only [apply_eq_iff_eq, reduceCtorEq]
simp [h1, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem removeNone_optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : removeNone e.optionCongr = e :=
Equiv.ext fun x => Option.some_injective _ <| removeNone_some _ ⟨e x, by simp [EquivFunctor.map]⟩
end RemoveNone
theorem optionCongr_injective : Function.Injective (optionCongr : α ≃ β → Option α ≃ Option β) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective removeNone_optionCongr
/-- Equivalences between `Option α` and `β` that send `none` to `x` are equivalent to
equivalences between `α` and `{y : β // y ≠ x}`. -/
def optionSubtype [DecidableEq β] (x : β) :
{ e : Option α ≃ β // e none = x } ≃ (α ≃ { y : β // y ≠ x }) where
toFun e :=
{ toFun := fun a =>
⟨(e : Option α ≃ β) a, ((EquivLike.injective _).ne_iff' e.property).2 (some_ne_none _)⟩,
invFun := fun b =>
get _
(ne_none_iff_isSome.1
(((EquivLike.injective _).ne_iff'
((apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply _).1 e.property).symm).2 b.property)),
left_inv := fun a => by
rw [← some_inj, some_get]
exact symm_apply_apply (e : Option α ≃ β) a,
right_inv := fun b => by
ext
simp }
invFun e :=
⟨{ toFun := fun a => casesOn' a x (Subtype.val ∘ e),
invFun := fun b => if h : b = x then none else e.symm ⟨b, h⟩,
left_inv := fun a => by
cases a with
| none => simp
| some a =>
simp only [casesOn'_some, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_eta,
symm_apply_apply, dite_eq_ite]
exact if_neg (e a).property,
right_inv := fun b => by
by_cases h : b = x <;> simp [h] },
rfl⟩
left_inv e := by
ext a
cases a
· simpa using e.property.symm
· simp
right_inv e := by
ext a
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionSubtype_apply_apply
[DecidableEq β] (x : β)
(e : { e : Option α ≃ β // e none = x })
(a : α)
(h) : optionSubtype x e a = ⟨(e : Option α ≃ β) a, h⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_optionSubtype_apply_apply
[DecidableEq β] (x : β)
(e : { e : Option α ≃ β // e none = x })
(a : α) : ↑(optionSubtype x e a) = (e : Option α ≃ β) a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionSubtype_apply_symm_apply
[DecidableEq β] (x : β)
(e : { e : Option α ≃ β // e none = x })
(b : { y : β // y ≠ x }) : ↑((optionSubtype x e).symm b) = (e : Option α ≃ β).symm b := by
dsimp only [optionSubtype]
simp
@[simp]
theorem optionSubtype_symm_apply_apply_coe [DecidableEq β] (x : β) (e : α ≃ { y : β // y ≠ x })
(a : α) : ((optionSubtype x).symm e : Option α ≃ β) a = e a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionSubtype_symm_apply_apply_some
[DecidableEq β]
(x : β)
(e : α ≃ { y : β // y ≠ x })
(a : α) : ((optionSubtype x).symm e : Option α ≃ β) (some a) = e a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionSubtype_symm_apply_apply_none
[DecidableEq β]
(x : β)
(e : α ≃ { y : β // y ≠ x }) : ((optionSubtype x).symm e : Option α ≃ β) none = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionSubtype_symm_apply_symm_apply [DecidableEq β] (x : β) (e : α ≃ { y : β // y ≠ x })
(b : { y : β // y ≠ x }) : ((optionSubtype x).symm e : Option α ≃ β).symm b = e.symm b := by
simp only [optionSubtype, coe_fn_symm_mk, Subtype.coe_mk,
Subtype.coe_eta, dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
exact fun h => False.elim (b.property h)
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b : α}
/-- Any type with a distinguished element is equivalent to an `Option` type on the subtype excluding
that element. -/
@[simps!]
def optionSubtypeNe (a : α) : Option {b // b ≠ a} ≃ α := optionSubtype a |>.symm (.refl _) |>.1
lemma optionSubtypeNe_symm_self (a : α) : (optionSubtypeNe a).symm a = none := by simp
lemma optionSubtypeNe_symm_of_ne (hba : b ≠ a) : (optionSubtypeNe a).symm b = some ⟨b, hba⟩ := by
simp [hba]
@[simp] lemma optionSubtypeNe_none (a : α) : optionSubtypeNe a none = a := rfl
@[simp] lemma optionSubtypeNe_some (a : α) (b) : optionSubtypeNe a (some b) = b := rfl
open Sum
/-- `Option α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ PUnit` -/
def optionEquivSumPUnit.{v, w} (α : Type w) : Option α ≃ α ⊕ PUnit.{v+1} :=
⟨fun o => o.elim (inr PUnit.unit) inl, fun s => s.elim some fun _ => none,
fun o => by cases o <;> rfl,
fun s => by rcases s with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_none {α} : optionEquivSumPUnit α none = Sum.inr PUnit.unit :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_some {α} (a) : optionEquivSumPUnit α (some a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_coe {α} (a : α) : optionEquivSumPUnit α a = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Option.lean | 262 | 266 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Bhavik Mehta, Daniel Weber, Stefan Kebekus
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.TautoSet
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subset
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Basic
/-!
# Discrete subsets of topological spaces
This file contains various additional properties of discrete subsets of topological spaces.
## Discreteness and compact sets
Given a topological space `X` together with a subset `s ⊆ X`, there are two distinct concepts of
"discreteness" which may hold. These are:
(i) Every point of `s` is isolated (i.e., the subset topology induced on `s` is the discrete
topology).
(ii) Every compact subset of `X` meets `s` only finitely often (i.e., the inclusion map `s → X`
tends to the cocompact filter along the cofinite filter on `s`).
When `s` is closed, the two conditions are equivalent provided `X` is locally compact and T1,
see `IsClosed.tendsto_coe_cofinite_iff`.
### Main statements
* `tendsto_cofinite_cocompact_iff`:
* `IsClosed.tendsto_coe_cofinite_iff`:
## Co-discrete open sets
We define the filter `Filter.codiscreteWithin S`, which is the supremum of all `𝓝[S \ {x}] x`.
This is the filter of all open codiscrete sets within S. We also define `Filter.codiscrete` as
`Filter.codiscreteWithin univ`, which is the filter of all open codiscrete sets in the space.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
section cofinite_cocompact
lemma tendsto_cofinite_cocompact_iff :
Tendsto f cofinite (cocompact _) ↔ ∀ K, IsCompact K → Set.Finite (f ⁻¹' K) := by
rw [hasBasis_cocompact.tendsto_right_iff]
refine forall₂_congr (fun K _ ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_compl_iff, eventually_cofinite, not_not, preimage]
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
lemma Continuous.discrete_of_tendsto_cofinite_cocompact [T1Space X] [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace Y]
(hf' : Continuous f) (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (cocompact _)) :
DiscreteTopology X := by
refine singletons_open_iff_discrete.mp (fun x ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨K : Set Y, hK : IsCompact K, hK' : K ∈ 𝓝 (f x)⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds (f x)
| obtain ⟨U : Set Y, hU₁ : U ⊆ K, hU₂ : IsOpen U, hU₃ : f x ∈ U⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hK'
have hU₄ : Set.Finite (f⁻¹' U) :=
Finite.subset (tendsto_cofinite_cocompact_iff.mp hf K hK) (preimage_mono hU₁)
exact isOpen_singleton_of_finite_mem_nhds _ ((hU₂.preimage hf').mem_nhds hU₃) hU₄
| Mathlib/Topology/DiscreteSubset.lean | 60 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_injective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Injective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨a₁, b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂, h₂⟩, eq =>
have b_eq : b₁ = b₂ := congr_arg Subtype.val eq
have a_eq : a₁ = a₂ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
have : b₁ ∈ t a₁ ∩ t a₂ := ⟨h₁, b_eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
(h ne).le_bot this
Sigma.eq a_eq <| Subtype.eq <| by subst b_eq; subst a_eq; rfl
theorem sigmaToiUnion_bijective (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
Bijective (sigmaToiUnion t) :=
⟨sigmaToiUnion_injective t h, sigmaToiUnion_surjective t⟩
/-- Equivalence from the disjoint union of a family of sets forming a partition of `β`, to `β`
itself. -/
noncomputable def sigmaEquiv (s : α → Set β) (hs : ∀ b, ∃! i, b ∈ s i) :
(Σ i, s i) ≃ β where
toFun | ⟨_, b⟩ => b
invFun b := ⟨(hs b).choose, b, (hs b).choose_spec.1⟩
left_inv | ⟨i, b, hb⟩ => Sigma.subtype_ext ((hs b).choose_spec.2 i hb).symm rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- Equivalence between a disjoint union and a dependent sum. -/
noncomputable def unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint {t : α → Set β}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) :
(⋃ i, t i) ≃ Σi, t i :=
(Equiv.ofBijective _ <| sigmaToiUnion_bijective t h).symm
theorem iUnion_ge_eq_iUnion_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋃ i ≥ n, u i = ⋃ i, u (i + n) :=
iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add u n
theorem iInter_ge_eq_iInter_nat_add (u : ℕ → Set α) (n : ℕ) : ⋂ i ≥ n, u i = ⋂ i, u (i + n) :=
iInf_ge_eq_iInf_nat_add u n
theorem _root_.Monotone.iUnion_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Monotone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, f (n + k) = ⋃ n, f n :=
hf.iSup_nat_add k
theorem _root_.Antitone.iInter_nat_add {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf : Antitone f) (k : ℕ) :
⋂ n, f (n + k) = ⋂ n, f n :=
hf.iInf_nat_add k
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iInter_ge_nat_add (f : ℕ → Set α) (k : ℕ) :
⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f (i + k) = ⋃ n, ⋂ i ≥ n, f i :=
iSup_iInf_ge_nat_add f k
theorem union_iUnion_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∪ ⋃ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋃ i, u i :=
sup_iSup_nat_succ u
theorem inter_iInter_nat_succ (u : ℕ → Set α) : (u 0 ∩ ⋂ i, u (i + 1)) = ⋂ i, u i :=
inf_iInf_nat_succ u
end Set
open Set
variable [CompleteLattice β]
theorem iSup_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨆ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨆ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a := by
rw [iSup_comm]
simp_rw [mem_iUnion, iSup_exists]
theorem iInf_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : ⨅ a ∈ ⋃ i, s i, f a = ⨅ (i) (a ∈ s i), f a :=
iSup_iUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s f
theorem sSup_iUnion (t : ι → Set β) : sSup (⋃ i, t i) = ⨆ i, sSup (t i) := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sSup_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sSup (⋃₀ s) = ⨆ t ∈ s, sSup t := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_iUnion]
theorem sInf_sUnion (s : Set (Set β)) : sInf (⋃₀ s) = ⨅ t ∈ s, sInf t :=
sSup_sUnion (β := βᵒᵈ) s
lemma iSup_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨆ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨆ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iSup_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
lemma iInf_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) :
(⨅ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, f x) = ⨅ (s ∈ S) (x ∈ s), f x := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, iInf_iUnion, ← iInf_subtype'']
lemma forall_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← iInf_Prop_eq, iInf_sUnion]
lemma exists_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ ⋃₀ S, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [← exists_prop, ← iSup_Prop_eq, iSup_sUnion]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,982 | 1,984 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
/-!
# `List.count` as a bundled homomorphism
In this file we define `FreeMonoid.countP`, `FreeMonoid.count`, `FreeAddMonoid.countP`, and
`FreeAddMonoid.count`. These are `List.countP` and `List.count` bundled as multiplicative and
additive homomorphisms from `FreeMonoid` and `FreeAddMonoid`.
We do not use `to_additive` too much because it can't map `Multiplicative ℕ` to `ℕ`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
namespace FreeMonoid
/-- `List.countP` lifted to free monoids -/
@[to_additive "`List.countP` lifted to free additive monoids"]
def countP' (l : FreeMonoid α) : ℕ := l.toList.countP p
@[to_additive]
lemma countP'_one : (1 : FreeMonoid α).countP' p = 0 := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma countP'_mul (l₁ l₂ : FreeMonoid α) : (l₁ * l₂).countP' p = l₁.countP' p + l₂.countP' p := by
dsimp [countP']
simp only [List.countP_append]
/-- `List.countP` as a bundled multiplicative monoid homomorphism. -/
def countP : FreeMonoid α →* Multiplicative ℕ where
toFun := .ofAdd ∘ FreeMonoid.countP' p
map_one' := by
simp [countP'_one p]
map_mul' x y := by
simp [countP'_mul p]
theorem countP_apply (l : FreeMonoid α) : l.countP p = .ofAdd (l.toList.countP p) := rfl
|
lemma countP_of (x : α) : (of x).countP p =
if p x then Multiplicative.ofAdd 1 else Multiplicative.ofAdd 0 := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/FreeMonoid/Count.lean | 43 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# fintype instances for sigma types
-/
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {ι α : Type*} {κ : ι → Type*} [Π i, Fintype (κ i)]
open Finset Function
lemma Set.biUnion_finsetSigma_univ (s : Finset ι) (f : Sigma κ → Set α) :
⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma fun _ ↦ Finset.univ, f ij = ⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j, f ⟨i, j⟩ := by aesop
lemma Set.biUnion_finsetSigma_univ' (s : Finset ι) (f : Π i, κ i → Set α) :
⋃ i ∈ s, ⋃ j, f i j = ⋃ ij ∈ s.sigma fun _ ↦ Finset.univ, f ij.1 ij.2 := by aesop
lemma Set.biInter_finsetSigma_univ (s : Finset ι) (f : Sigma κ → Set α) :
⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma fun _ ↦ Finset.univ, f ij = ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j, f ⟨i, j⟩ := by aesop
attribute [local simp] Sigma.forall in
lemma Set.biInter_finsetSigma_univ' (s : Finset ι) (f : Π i, κ i → Set α) :
| ⋂ i ∈ s, ⋂ j, f i j = ⋂ ij ∈ s.sigma fun _ ↦ Finset.univ, f ij.1 ij.2 := by aesop
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Sigma.lean | 35 | 36 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
/-!
# The Minkowski functional, normed field version
In this file we define `(egauge 𝕜 s ·)`
to be the Minkowski functional (gauge) of the set `s`
in a topological vector space `E` over a normed field `𝕜`,
as a function `E → ℝ≥0∞`.
It is defined as the infimum of the norms of `c : 𝕜` such that `x ∈ c • s`.
In particular, for `𝕜 = ℝ≥0` this definition gives an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued version of `gauge`
defined in `Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean`.
This definition can be used to generalize the notion of Fréchet derivative
to maps between topological vector spaces without norms.
Currently, we can't reuse results about `egauge` for `gauge`,
because we lack a theory of normed semifields.
-/
open Function Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology Pointwise ENNReal NNReal
section SMul
/-- The Minkowski functional for vector spaces over normed fields.
Given a set `s` in a vector space over a normed field `𝕜`,
`egauge s` is the functional which sends `x : E`
to the infimum of `‖c‖ₑ` over `c` such that `x` belongs to `s` scaled by `c`.
The definition only requires `𝕜` to have a `ENorm` instance
and `(· • ·) : 𝕜 → E → E` to be defined.
This way the definition applies, e.g., to `𝕜 = ℝ≥0`.
For `𝕜 = ℝ≥0`, the function is equal (up to conversion to `ℝ`)
to the usual Minkowski functional defined in `gauge`. -/
noncomputable def egauge (𝕜 : Type*) [ENorm 𝕜] {E : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E] (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (c : 𝕜) (_ : x ∈ c • s), ‖c‖ₑ
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NNNorm 𝕜] {E : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E] {c : 𝕜} {s t : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
lemma Set.MapsTo.egauge_le {E' F : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E'] [FunLike F E E'] [MulActionHomClass F 𝕜 E E']
(f : F) {t : Set E'} (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 t (f x) ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x :=
iInf_mono fun c ↦ iInf_mono' fun hc ↦ ⟨h.smul_set c hc, le_rfl⟩
@[mono, gcongr]
lemma egauge_anti (h : s ⊆ t) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 t x ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x :=
MapsTo.egauge_le _ (MulActionHom.id ..) h _
@[simp] lemma egauge_empty (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 ∅ x = ∞ := by simp [egauge]
variable {𝕜}
lemma egauge_le_of_mem_smul (h : x ∈ c • s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ ‖c‖ₑ := iInf₂_le c h
lemma le_egauge_iff : r ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x ↔ ∀ c : 𝕜, x ∈ c • s → r ≤ ‖c‖ₑ := le_iInf₂_iff
lemma egauge_eq_top : egauge 𝕜 s x = ∞ ↔ ∀ c : 𝕜, x ∉ c • s := by simp [egauge]
lemma egauge_lt_iff : egauge 𝕜 s x < r ↔ ∃ c : 𝕜, x ∈ c • s ∧ ‖c‖ₑ < r := by
simp [egauge, iInf_lt_iff]
lemma egauge_union (s t : Set E) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 (s ∪ t) x = egauge 𝕜 s x ⊓ egauge 𝕜 t x := by
unfold egauge
simp [smul_set_union, iInf_or, iInf_inf_eq]
lemma le_egauge_inter (s t : Set E) (x : E) :
egauge 𝕜 s x ⊔ egauge 𝕜 t x ≤ egauge 𝕜 (s ∩ t) x :=
max_le (egauge_anti _ inter_subset_left _) (egauge_anti _ inter_subset_right _)
lemma le_egauge_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)] {I : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ I) (s : ∀ i, Set (E i)) (x : ∀ i, E i) :
egauge 𝕜 (s i) (x i) ≤ egauge 𝕜 (I.pi s) x :=
MapsTo.egauge_le _ (Pi.evalMulActionHom i) (fun x hx ↦ by exact hx i hi) _
variable {F : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 F]
lemma le_egauge_prod (s : Set E) (t : Set F) (a : E) (b : F) :
max (egauge 𝕜 s a) (egauge 𝕜 t b) ≤ egauge 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) (a, b) :=
max_le (mapsTo_fst_prod.egauge_le 𝕜 (MulActionHom.fst 𝕜 E F) (a, b))
(MapsTo.egauge_le 𝕜 (MulActionHom.snd 𝕜 E F) mapsTo_snd_prod (a, b))
end SMul
section SMulZero
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NNNorm 𝕜] [Nonempty 𝕜] {E : Type*} [Zero E] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E] {x : E}
@[simp] lemma egauge_zero_left_eq_top : egauge 𝕜 0 x = ∞ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simp [egauge_eq_top]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, egauge_zero_left⟩ := egauge_zero_left_eq_top
end SMulZero
section NormedDivisionRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
{c : 𝕜} {s : Set E} {x : E}
/-- If `c • x ∈ s` and `c ≠ 0`, then `egauge 𝕜 s x` is at most `(‖c‖₊⁻¹ : ℝ≥0)`.
See also `egauge_le_of_smul_mem`. -/
lemma egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne (h : c • x ∈ s) (hc : c ≠ 0) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ (‖c‖₊⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) := by
rw [← nnnorm_inv]
exact egauge_le_of_mem_smul <| (mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ hc _ _).2 h
/-- If `c • x ∈ s`, then `egauge 𝕜 s x` is at most `‖c‖ₑ⁻¹`.
See also `egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne`. -/
lemma egauge_le_of_smul_mem (h : c • x ∈ s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ ‖c‖ₑ⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with rfl | hc
· simp
· exact (egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne h hc).trans ENNReal.coe_inv_le
lemma mem_smul_of_egauge_lt (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (hc : egauge 𝕜 s x < ‖c‖ₑ) : x ∈ c • s :=
let ⟨a, hxa, ha⟩ := egauge_lt_iff.1 hc
hs.smul_mono (by simpa [enorm] using ha.le) hxa
lemma mem_of_egauge_lt_one (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (hx : egauge 𝕜 s x < 1) : x ∈ s :=
one_smul 𝕜 s ▸ mem_smul_of_egauge_lt hs (by simpa)
lemma egauge_eq_zero_iff : egauge 𝕜 s x = 0 ↔ ∃ᶠ c : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x ∈ c • s := by
refine (iInf₂_eq_bot _).trans ?_
rw [(nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_edist).frequently_iff]
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
lemma egauge_univ [(𝓝[≠] (0 : 𝕜)).NeBot] : egauge 𝕜 univ x = 0 := by
rw [egauge_eq_zero_iff]
| refine (frequently_iff_neBot.2 ‹_›).mono fun c hc ↦ ?_
simp_all [smul_set_univ₀]
variable (𝕜)
@[simp]
lemma egauge_zero_right (hs : s.Nonempty) : egauge 𝕜 s 0 = 0 := by
have : 0 ∈ (0 : 𝕜) • s := by simp [zero_smul_set hs]
simpa using egauge_le_of_mem_smul this
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/EGauge.lean | 137 | 146 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
| ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 284 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Ultra.Basic
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the `p`-adic numbers (rationals) `ℚ_[p]` as
the completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
We show that the `p`-adic norm on `ℚ` extends to `ℚ_[p]`, that `ℚ` is embedded in `ℚ_[p]`,
and that `ℚ_[p]` is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `Padic` : the type of `p`-adic numbers
* `padicNormE` : the rational valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`
* `Padic.addValuation` : the additive `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ_[p]`, with values in `WithTop ℤ`
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℚ_[p]` for the `p`-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct `ℝ`.
`ℚ_[p]` inherits a field structure from this construction.
The extension of the norm on `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` is *not* analogous to extending the absolute value to
`ℝ` and hence the proof that `ℚ_[p]` is complete is different from the proof that ℝ is complete.
`padicNormE` is the rational-valued `p`-adic norm on `ℚ_[p]`.
To instantiate `ℚ_[p]` as a normed field, we must cast this into an `ℝ`-valued norm.
The `ℝ`-valued norm, using notation `‖ ‖` from normed spaces,
is the canonical representation of this norm.
`simp` prefers `padicNorm` to `padicNormE` when possible.
Since `padicNormE` and `‖ ‖` have different types, `simp` does not rewrite one to the other.
Coercions from `ℚ` to `ℚ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat padicNorm CauSeq CauSeq.Completion Metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm. -/
abbrev PadicSeq (p : ℕ) :=
CauSeq _ (padicNorm p)
namespace PadicSeq
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
theorem stationary {f : CauSeq ℚ (padicNorm p)} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
have : ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padicNorm p (f j) :=
CauSeq.abv_pos_of_not_limZero <| not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this
let ⟨N2, hN2⟩ := CauSeq.cauchy₂ f hε
⟨max N1 N2, fun n m hn hm ↦ by
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < ε := hN2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 _ (max_le_iff.1 hm).2
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < padicNorm p (f n) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le this <| hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1
have : padicNorm p (f n - f m) < max (padicNorm p (f n)) (padicNorm p (f m)) :=
lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl this)
by_contra hne
rw [← padicNorm.neg (f m)] at hne
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne hne
rw [padicNorm.neg, max_comm] at hnam
rw [← hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this⟩
/-- For all `n ≥ stationaryPoint f hf`, the `p`-adic norm of `f n` is the same. -/
def stationaryPoint {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
Classical.choose <| stationary hf
theorem stationaryPoint_spec {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n},
stationaryPoint hf ≤ m → stationaryPoint hf ≤ n → padicNorm p (f n) = padicNorm p (f m) :=
@(Classical.choose_spec <| stationary hf)
open Classical in
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary,
we can lift the norm to sequences. -/
def norm (f : PadicSeq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_zero_iff (f : PadicSeq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra hf
unfold norm at h
split_ifs at h
apply hf
intro ε hε
exists stationaryPoint hf
intro j hj
have heq := stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hj
simpa [h, heq]
· intro h
simp [norm, h]
end
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p}
(h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 := fun ε hε ↦
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε
⟨i, fun j hj ↦ by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
theorem norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) : f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
theorem norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padicNorm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padicNorm p (f <| stationaryPoint hf) := by simp [norm, hf]
⟨f <| stationaryPoint hf, heq, fun h ↦
norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
theorem not_limZero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q) :=
fun h' ↦ hq <| const_limZero.1 h'
theorem not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬const (padicNorm p) q ≈ 0 :=
fun h : LimZero (const (padicNorm p) q - 0) ↦
not_limZero_const_of_nonzero (p := p) hq <| by simpa using h
theorem norm_nonneg (f : PadicSeq p) : 0 ≤ f.norm := by
classical exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm] else by simp [norm, hf, padicNorm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max (stationaryPoint hf) (max v2 v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_left {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max (stationaryPoint hf) v3))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_left _ v3
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
theorem lift_index_right {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) =
padicNorm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationaryPoint hf)))) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec hf
· apply le_trans
· apply le_max_right v2
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
end Embedding
section Valuation
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
/-! ### Valuation on `PadicSeq` -/
open Classical in
/-- The `p`-adic valuation on `ℚ` lifts to `PadicSeq p`.
`Valuation f` is defined to be the valuation of the (`ℚ`-valued) stationary point of `f`. -/
def valuation (f : PadicSeq p) : ℤ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padicValRat p (f (stationaryPoint hf))
theorem norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation {f : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) :
f.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-f.valuation : ℤ) := by
rw [norm, valuation, dif_neg hf, dif_neg hf, padicNorm, if_neg]
intro H
apply CauSeq.not_limZero_of_not_congr_zero hf
intro ε hε
use stationaryPoint hf
intro n hn
rw [stationaryPoint_spec hf le_rfl hn]
simpa [H] using hε
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-10")] alias norm_eq_pow_val := norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation
theorem val_eq_iff_norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) :
f.valuation = g.valuation ↔ f.norm = g.norm := by
rw [norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hf, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hg, ← neg_inj, zpow_right_inj₀]
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).pos
· exact mod_cast (Fact.out : p.Prime).ne_one
end Valuation
end PadicSeq
section
open PadicSeq
-- Porting note: Commented out `padic_index_simp` tactic
/-
private unsafe def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : Interactive.Loc := Interactive.Loc.ns [none]) : tactic Unit := do
let [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mapM fun n => tactic.mk_app `` stationary_point [n] <|> return n
let e1 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e2 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return q(True)
let e3 ← tactic.mk_app `` lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return q(True)
let sl ← [e1, e2, e3].foldlM (fun s e => simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk
when at_ (tactic.simp_target sl >> tactic.skip)
let hs ← at_.get_locals
hs (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/-- This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts `padicNorm (f (stationary_point f))` to
`padicNorm (f (max _ _ _))`. -/
unsafe def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic Unit := do
let [h, f, g] ← l.mapM tactic.i_to_expr
index_simp_core h f g at_
-/
end
namespace PadicSeq
section Embedding
open CauSeq
variable {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_mul (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero' _ hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, zero_mul]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hf : f * g ≈ 0 := mul_equiv_zero _ hg
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos, mul_zero]
else by
unfold norm
have hfg := mul_not_equiv_zero hf hg
simp only [hfg, hf, hg, dite_false]
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.mul
theorem eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
theorem ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : PadicSeq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬f ≈ 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _ |>.not
theorem norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padicNorm p) q) = padicNorm p q := by
obtain rfl | hq := eq_or_ne q 0
· simp [norm]
· simp [norm, not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq]
theorem norm_values_discrete (a : PadicSeq p) (ha : ¬a ≈ 0) : ∃ z : ℤ, a.norm = (p : ℚ) ^ (-z) := by
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha
simpa [hk] using padicNorm.values_discrete hk'
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : PadicSeq p) = 1 := by
have h1 : ¬(1 : PadicSeq p) ≈ 0 := one_not_equiv_zero _
simp [h1, norm, hp.1.one_lt]
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) ≠ padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)))
(hlt : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) :
False := by
have hpn : 0 < padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) - padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) :=
sub_pos_of_lt hlt
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hfg _ hpn
let i := max N (max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg))
have hi : N ≤ i := le_max_left _ _
have hN' := hN _ hi
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hlt`
rw [lift_index_left hf N (stationaryPoint hg), lift_index_right hg N (stationaryPoint hf)]
at hN' h hlt
have hpne : padicNorm p (f i) ≠ padicNorm p (-g i) := by rwa [← padicNorm.neg (g i)] at h
rw [CauSeq.sub_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_max_of_ne hpne, padicNorm.neg, max_eq_left_of_lt hlt]
at hN'
have : padicNorm p (f i) < padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN'
apply sub_le_self
apply padicNorm.nonneg
exact lt_irrefl _ this
private theorem norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hf : ¬f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) := by
by_contra h
cases lt_or_le (padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg))) (padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf))) with
| inl hlt =>
exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hlt
| inr hle =>
apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (Setoid.symm hfg) (Ne.symm h)
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hle h
theorem norm_equiv {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := Setoid.trans (Setoid.symm hfg) hf
simp [norm, hf, hg]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := hf ∘ Setoid.trans hfg
unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private theorem norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬f ≈ 0)
(hg : ¬g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
unfold norm; split_ifs
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg]`
rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
apply padicNorm.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : PadicSeq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
exact if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then by
have : 0 ≤ max f.norm g.norm := le_max_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _)
simpa only [hfg, norm]
else
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g := by
change LimZero (f - 0) at hf
show LimZero (f + g - g); · simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right] using hf
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf
have : max f.norm g.norm = g.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f := by
change LimZero (g - 0) at hg
show LimZero (f + g - f); · simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero] using hg
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv hfg'
have hcl : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg
have : max f.norm g.norm = f.norm := by rw [hcl]; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
theorem norm_eq {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : ∀ k, padicNorm p (f k) = padicNorm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm := by
classical
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have hg : g ≈ 0 := equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf
simp only [hf, hg, norm, dif_pos]
else by
have hg : ¬g ≈ 0 := fun hg ↦
hf <| equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp only [h, forall_const, eq_self_iff_true]) hg
simp only [hg, hf, norm, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
let i := max (stationaryPoint hf) (stationaryPoint hg)
have hpf : padicNorm p (f (stationaryPoint hf)) = padicNorm p (f i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_left
· exact le_rfl
have hpg : padicNorm p (g (stationaryPoint hg)) = padicNorm p (g i) := by
apply stationaryPoint_spec
· apply le_max_right
· exact le_rfl
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
theorem norm_neg (a : PadicSeq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq <| by simp
theorem norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : PadicSeq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm := by
have : LimZero (f + g - 0) := h
have : f ≈ -g := show LimZero (f - -g) by simpa only [sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
have : f.norm = (-g).norm := norm_equiv this
simpa only [norm_neg] using this
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : PadicSeq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm := by
classical
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0 := mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne
exact if hf : f ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (f - 0) := hf
have : f + g ≈ g := show LimZero (f + g - g) by simpa only [sub_zero, add_sub_cancel_right]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = g.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : f.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)]
else
if hg : g ≈ 0 then by
have : LimZero (g - 0) := hg
have : f + g ≈ f := show LimZero (f + g - f) by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left, sub_zero]
have h1 : (f + g).norm = f.norm := norm_equiv this
have h2 : g.norm = 0 := (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg
rw [h1, h2, max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)]
else by
unfold norm at hfgne ⊢; split_ifs at hfgne ⊢
-- Porting note: originally `padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at hfgne ⊢`
rw [lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg] at hfgne
· rw [lift_index_left_left hfg, lift_index_left hf, lift_index_right hg]
exact padicNorm.add_eq_max_of_ne hfgne
end Embedding
end PadicSeq
/-- The `p`-adic numbers `ℚ_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
-/
def Padic (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (padicNorm p)
/-- notation for p-padic rationals -/
| notation "ℚ_[" p "]" => Padic p
namespace Padic
section Completion
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance field : Field ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.field
instance : Inhabited ℚ_[p] :=
⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : CommRing ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.commRing
instance : Ring ℚ_[p] :=
Cauchy.ring
instance : Zero ℚ_[p] := by infer_instance
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicNumbers.lean | 433 | 454 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
/-!
# Multivariate quotients of polynomial functors.
Basic definition of multivariate QPF. QPFs form a compositional framework
for defining inductive and coinductive types, their quotients and nesting.
The idea is based on building ever larger functors. For instance, we can define
a list using a shape functor:
```lean
inductive ListShape (a b : Type)
| nil : ListShape
| cons : a -> b -> ListShape
```
This shape can itself be decomposed as a sum of product which are themselves
QPFs. It follows that the shape is a QPF and we can take its fixed point
and create the list itself:
```lean
def List (a : Type) := fix ListShape a -- not the actual notation
```
We can continue and define the quotient on permutation of lists and create
the multiset type:
```lean
def Multiset (a : Type) := QPF.quot List.perm List a -- not the actual notion
```
And `Multiset` is also a QPF. We can then create a novel data type (for Lean):
```lean
inductive Tree (a : Type)
| node : a -> Multiset Tree -> Tree
```
An unordered tree. This is currently not supported by Lean because it nests
an inductive type inside of a quotient. We can go further and define
unordered, possibly infinite trees:
```lean
coinductive Tree' (a : Type)
| node : a -> Multiset Tree' -> Tree'
```
by using the `cofix` construct. Those options can all be mixed and
matched because they preserve the properties of QPF. The latter example,
`Tree'`, combines fixed point, co-fixed point and quotients.
## Related modules
* constructions
* Fix
* Cofix
* Quot
* Comp
* Sigma / Pi
* Prj
* Const
each proves that some operations on functors preserves the QPF structure
-/
set_option linter.style.longLine false in
/-!
## Reference
[Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
open MvFunctor
/-- Multivariate quotients of polynomial functors.
-/
class MvQPF {n : ℕ} (F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type*) extends MvFunctor F where
P : MvPFunctor.{u} n
abs : ∀ {α}, P α → F α
repr : ∀ {α}, F α → P α
abs_repr : ∀ {α} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x
abs_map : ∀ {α β} (f : α ⟹ β) (p : P α), abs (f <$$> p) = f <$$> abs p
namespace MvQPF
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type*} [q : MvQPF F]
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
/-!
### Show that every MvQPF is a lawful MvFunctor.
-/
protected theorem id_map {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) : TypeVec.id <$$> x = x := by
rw [← abs_repr x, ← abs_map]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_map {α β γ : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : β ⟹ γ) (x : F α) :
| (g ⊚ f) <$$> x = g <$$> f <$$> x := by
rw [← abs_repr x, ← abs_map, ← abs_map, ← abs_map]
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Basic.lean | 110 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.ListTraverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Topology on lists and vectors
-/
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter
open Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
instance : TopologicalSpace (List α) :=
TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds (traverse nhds)
theorem nhds_list (as : List α) : 𝓝 as = traverse 𝓝 as := by
refine nhds_mkOfNhds _ _ ?_ ?_
· intro l
induction l with
| nil => exact le_rfl
| cons a l ih =>
suffices List.cons <$> pure a <*> pure l ≤ List.cons <$> 𝓝 a <*> traverse 𝓝 l by
simpa only [functor_norm] using this
exact Filter.seq_mono (Filter.map_mono <| pure_le_nhds a) ih
· intro l s hs
rcases (mem_traverse_iff _ _).1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hus⟩
clear as hs
have : ∃ v : List (Set α), l.Forall₂ (fun a s => IsOpen s ∧ a ∈ s) v ∧ sequence v ⊆ s := by
induction hu generalizing s with
| nil =>
exists []
simp only [List.forall₂_nil_left_iff, exists_eq_left]
exact ⟨trivial, hus⟩
| cons ht _ ih =>
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hut, hu⟩
rcases ih _ Subset.rfl with ⟨v, hv, hvss⟩
exact
⟨u::v, List.Forall₂.cons hu hv,
Subset.trans (Set.seq_mono (Set.image_subset _ hut) hvss) hus⟩
rcases this with ⟨v, hv, hvs⟩
have : sequence v ∈ traverse 𝓝 l :=
mem_traverse _ _ <| hv.imp fun a s ⟨hs, ha⟩ => IsOpen.mem_nhds hs ha
refine mem_of_superset this fun u hu ↦ ?_
have hu := (List.mem_traverse _ _).1 hu
have : List.Forall₂ (fun a s => IsOpen s ∧ a ∈ s) u v := by
refine List.Forall₂.flip ?_
replace hv := hv.flip
simp only [List.forall₂_and_left, Function.flip_def] at hv ⊢
exact ⟨hv.1, hu.flip⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ hvs
exact mem_traverse _ _ (this.imp fun a s ⟨hs, ha⟩ => IsOpen.mem_nhds hs ha)
@[simp]
theorem nhds_nil : 𝓝 ([] : List α) = pure [] := by
rw [nhds_list, List.traverse_nil _]
theorem nhds_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : 𝓝 (a::l) = List.cons <$> 𝓝 a <*> 𝓝 l := by
rw [nhds_list, List.traverse_cons _, ← nhds_list]
| theorem List.tendsto_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
Tendsto (fun p : α × List α => List.cons p.1 p.2) (𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 l) (𝓝 (a::l)) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/List.lean | 70 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Multiset
/-!
# Algebraic properties of multiset intervals
This file provides results about the interaction of algebra with `Multiset.Ixx`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid α]
[ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
lemma map_add_left_Icc (a b c : α) : (Icc a b).map (c + ·) = Icc (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Icc, Icc, ← Finset.image_add_left_Icc, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ico (a b c : α) : (Ico a b).map (c + ·) = Ico (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ico, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ioc (a b c : α) : (Ioc a b).map (c + ·) = Ioc (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ioc, Ioc, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ioc, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_left_Ioo (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).map (c + ·) = Ioo (c + a) (c + b) := by
classical rw [Ioo, Ioo, ← Finset.image_add_left_Ioo, Finset.image_val,
((Finset.nodup _).map <| add_right_injective c).dedup]
lemma map_add_right_Icc (a b c : α) : ((Icc a b).map fun x => x + c) = Icc (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Icc _ _ _
lemma map_add_right_Ico (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).map fun x => x + c) = Ico (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Ico _ _ _
lemma map_add_right_Ioc (a b c : α) : ((Ioc a b).map fun x => x + c) = Ioc (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Ioc _ _ _
lemma map_add_right_Ioo (a b c : α) : ((Ioo a b).map fun x => x + c) = Ioo (a + c) (b + c) := by
simp_rw [add_comm _ c]
exact map_add_left_Ioo _ _ _
|
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Multiset.lean | 52 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
/-!
# Rees algebra
The Rees algebra of an ideal `I` is the subalgebra `R[It]` of `R[t]` defined as `R[It] = ⨁ₙ Iⁿ tⁿ`.
This is used to prove the Artin-Rees lemma, and will potentially enable us to calculate some
blowup in the future.
## Main definition
- `reesAlgebra` : The Rees algebra of an ideal `I`, defined as a subalgebra of `R[X]`.
- `adjoin_monomial_eq_reesAlgebra` : The Rees algebra is generated by the degree one elements.
- `reesAlgebra.fg` : The Rees algebra of a f.g. ideal is of finite type. In particular, this
implies that the rees algebra over a noetherian ring is still noetherian.
-/
universe u v
variable {R M : Type u} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
open Polynomial
/-- The Rees algebra of an ideal `I`, defined as the subalgebra of `R[X]` whose `i`-th coefficient
falls in `I ^ i`. -/
def reesAlgebra : Subalgebra R R[X] where
carrier := { f | ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ I ^ i }
mul_mem' hf hg i := by
rw [coeff_mul]
apply Ideal.sum_mem
rintro ⟨j, k⟩ e
rw [← Finset.mem_antidiagonal.mp e, pow_add]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_mul (hf j) (hg k)
one_mem' i := by
rw [coeff_one]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
add_mem' hf hg i := by
rw [coeff_add]
exact Ideal.add_mem _ (hf i) (hg i)
zero_mem' _ := Ideal.zero_mem _
algebraMap_mem' r i := by
rw [algebraMap_apply, coeff_C]
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp
· simp
theorem mem_reesAlgebra_iff (f : R[X]) : f ∈ reesAlgebra I ↔ ∀ i, f.coeff i ∈ I ^ i :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_reesAlgebra_iff_support (f : R[X]) :
f ∈ reesAlgebra I ↔ ∀ i ∈ f.support, f.coeff i ∈ I ^ i := by
apply forall_congr'
intro a
rw [mem_support_iff, Iff.comm, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff, Ne, ← imp_iff_not_or]
exact fun e => e.symm ▸ (I ^ a).zero_mem
theorem reesAlgebra.monomial_mem {I : Ideal R} {i : ℕ} {r : R} :
monomial i r ∈ reesAlgebra I ↔ r ∈ I ^ i := by
simp +contextual [mem_reesAlgebra_iff_support, coeff_monomial, ←
imp_iff_not_or]
theorem monomial_mem_adjoin_monomial {I : Ideal R} {n : ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ∈ I ^ n) :
| monomial n r ∈ Algebra.adjoin R (Submodule.map (monomial 1 : R →ₗ[R] R[X]) I : Set R[X]) := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing r
· exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· rw [pow_succ'] at hr
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ReesAlgebra.lean | 76 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
/-!
# Adjoint of operators on Hilbert spaces
Given an operator `A : E →L[𝕜] F`, where `E` and `F` are Hilbert spaces, its adjoint
`adjoint A : F →L[𝕜] E` is the unique operator such that `⟪x, A y⟫ = ⟪adjoint A x, y⟫` for all
`x` and `y`.
We then use this to put a C⋆-algebra structure on `E →L[𝕜] E` with the adjoint as the star
operation.
This construction is used to define an adjoint for linear maps (i.e. not continuous) between
finite dimensional spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] (F →L[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a continuous
linear map, bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric equivalence.
* `LinearMap.adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] (F →ₗ[𝕜] E)`: the adjoint of a linear map between
finite-dimensional spaces, this time only as a conjugate-linear equivalence, since there is no
norm defined on these maps.
## Implementation notes
* The continuous conjugate-linear version `adjointAux` is only an intermediate
definition and is not meant to be used outside this file.
## Tags
adjoint
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-! ### Adjoint operator -/
open InnerProductSpace
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace G]
-- Note: made noncomputable to stop excess compilation
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/7103
/-- The adjoint, as a continuous conjugate-linear map. This is only meant as an auxiliary
definition for the main definition `adjoint`, where this is bundled as a conjugate-linear isometric
equivalence. -/
noncomputable def adjointAux : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.compSL _ _ _ _ _ ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E →L⋆[𝕜] E)).comp
(toSesqForm : (E →L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] F →L⋆[𝕜] NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E)
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_apply (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : F) :
adjointAux A x = ((toDual 𝕜 E).symm : NormedSpace.Dual 𝕜 E → E) ((toSesqForm A) x) :=
rfl
theorem adjointAux_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjointAux A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
rw [adjointAux_apply, toDual_symm_apply, toSesqForm_apply_coe, coe_comp', innerSL_apply_coe,
Function.comp_apply]
theorem adjointAux_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) :
⟪x, adjointAux A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, adjointAux_inner_left, inner_conj_symm]
variable [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjointAux_adjointAux (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : adjointAux (adjointAux A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjointAux_inner_right, adjointAux_inner_left]
@[simp]
theorem adjointAux_norm (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖adjointAux A‖ = ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
· nth_rw 1 [← adjointAux_adjointAux A]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [adjointAux_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
exact toSesqForm_apply_norm_le
/-- The adjoint of a bounded operator `A` from a Hilbert space `E` to another Hilbert space `F`,
denoted as `A†`. -/
def adjoint : (E →L[𝕜] F) ≃ₗᵢ⋆[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofSurjective { adjointAux with norm_map' := adjointAux_norm } fun A =>
⟨adjointAux A, adjointAux_adjointAux A⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[InnerProduct] postfix:1000 "†" => ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint
open InnerProduct
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪(A†) y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_left A x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, (A†) y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ :=
adjointAux_inner_right A x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] F) : A†† = A :=
adjointAux_adjointAux A
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →L[𝕜] G) (B : E →L[𝕜] F) : (A ∘L B)† = B† ∘L A† := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Function.comp_apply]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_left]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_left, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
theorem apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ ^ 2 = re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ := by
have h : ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫ = ⟪A x, A x⟫ := by rw [← adjoint_inner_right]; rfl
rw [h, ← inner_self_eq_norm_sq (𝕜 := 𝕜) _]
theorem apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_right (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪x, (A† ∘L A) x⟫) := by
rw [← apply_norm_sq_eq_inner_adjoint_right, Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →L[𝕜] F) (B : F →L[𝕜] E) : A = B† ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_id :
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E) = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 E := by
refine Eq.symm ?_
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
simp
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_subtypeL (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
U.subtypeL† = U.orthogonalProjection := by
symm
rw [eq_adjoint_iff]
intro x u
rw [U.coe_inner, U.inner_orthogonalProjection_left_eq_right,
U.orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self]
rfl
theorem _root_.Submodule.adjoint_orthogonalProjection (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
(U.orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] U)† = U.subtypeL := by
rw [← U.adjoint_subtypeL, adjoint_adjoint]
/-- `E →L[𝕜] E` is a star algebra with the adjoint as the star operation. -/
instance : Star (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint⟩
instance : InvolutiveStar (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_adjoint⟩
instance : StarMul (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨adjoint_comp⟩
instance : StarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add adjoint⟩
instance : StarModule 𝕜 (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smulₛₗ adjoint⟩
theorem star_eq_adjoint (A : E →L[𝕜] E) : star A = A† :=
rfl
/-- A continuous linear operator is self-adjoint iff it is equal to its adjoint. -/
theorem isSelfAdjoint_iff' {A : E →L[𝕜] E} : IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem norm_adjoint_comp_self (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
‖ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A ∘L A‖ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
‖A† ∘L A‖ ≤ ‖A†‖ * ‖A‖ := opNorm_comp_le _ _
_ = ‖A‖ * ‖A‖ := by rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· rw [← sq, ← Real.sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (norm_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (Real.sqrt_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
have :=
calc
re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫ ≤ ‖(A† ∘L A) x‖ * ‖x‖ := re_inner_le_norm _ _
_ ≤ ‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
calc
‖A x‖ = √(re ⟪(A† ∘L A) x, x⟫) := by rw [apply_norm_eq_sqrt_inner_adjoint_left]
_ ≤ √(‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := Real.sqrt_le_sqrt this
_ = √‖A† ∘L A‖ * ‖x‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, Real.sqrt_mul (norm_nonneg _) (‖x‖ * ‖x‖),
Real.sqrt_mul_self (norm_nonneg x)]
/-- The C⋆-algebra instance when `𝕜 := ℂ` can be found in
`Analysis.CStarAlgebra.ContinuousLinearMap`. -/
instance : CStarRing (E →L[𝕜] E) where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| Eq.symm <| norm_adjoint_comp_self x
theorem isAdjointPair_inner (A : E →L[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.IsAdjointPair (sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜)
(sesqFormOfInner : F →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜) A (A†) := by
intro x y
simp only [sesqFormOfInner_apply_apply, adjoint_inner_left, coe_coe]
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-! ### Self-adjoint operators -/
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace F]
theorem adjoint_eq {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint A = A :=
hA
/-- Every self-adjoint operator on an inner product space is symmetric. -/
theorem isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} (hA : IsSelfAdjoint A) : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw_mod_cast [← A.adjoint_inner_right, hA.adjoint_eq]
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem conj_adjoint {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : E →L[𝕜] F) :
IsSelfAdjoint (S ∘L T ∘L ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
/-- Conjugating preserves self-adjointness. -/
theorem adjoint_conj {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (S : F →L[𝕜] E) :
IsSelfAdjoint (ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint S ∘L T ∘L S) := by
rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff'] at hT ⊢
simp only [hT, adjoint_comp, adjoint_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc _ _ _
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric {A : E →L[𝕜] E} :
IsSelfAdjoint A ↔ (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric :=
⟨fun hA => hA.isSymmetric, fun hA =>
ext fun x => ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => (A.adjoint_inner_left y x).symm ▸ (hA x y).symm⟩
theorem _root_.LinearMap.IsSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint {A : E →L[𝕜] E}
(hA : (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric) : IsSelfAdjoint A := by
rwa [← ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric] at hA
/-- The orthogonal projection is self-adjoint. -/
theorem _root_.orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint (U : Submodule 𝕜 E) [CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint (U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) :=
U.orthogonalProjection_isSymmetric.isSelfAdjoint
theorem conj_orthogonalProjection {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) (U : Submodule 𝕜 E)
[CompleteSpace U] :
IsSelfAdjoint
(U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection ∘L T ∘L U.subtypeL ∘L U.orthogonalProjection) := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [← (orthogonalProjection_isSelfAdjoint U).adjoint_eq]
exact hT.adjoint_conj _
end IsSelfAdjoint
namespace LinearMap
variable [CompleteSpace E]
variable {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E}
/-- The **Hellinger--Toeplitz theorem**: Construct a self-adjoint operator from an everywhere
defined symmetric operator. -/
def IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : selfAdjoint (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨⟨T, hT.continuous⟩, ContinuousLinearMap.isSelfAdjoint_iff_isSymmetric.mpr hT⟩
theorem IsSymmetric.coe_toSelfAdjoint (hT : IsSymmetric T) : (hT.toSelfAdjoint : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) = T :=
rfl
theorem IsSymmetric.toSelfAdjoint_apply (hT : IsSymmetric T) {x : E} :
(hT.toSelfAdjoint : E → E) x = T x :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 G]
/- Porting note: Lean can't use `FiniteDimensional.complete` since it was generalized to topological
vector spaces. Use local instances instead. -/
/-- The adjoint of an operator from the finite-dimensional inner product space `E` to the
finite-dimensional inner product space `F`. -/
def adjoint : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ⋆[𝕜] F →ₗ[𝕜] E :=
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
/- Note: Instead of the two instances above, the following works:
```
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
have := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜
```
But removing one of the `have`s makes it fail. The reason is that `E` and `F` don't live
in the same universe, so the first `have` can no longer be used for `F` after its universe
metavariable has been assigned to that of `E`!
-/
((LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[𝕜] F) ≃ₗ[𝕜] E →L[𝕜] F).trans
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint.toLinearEquiv).trans
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
theorem adjoint_toContinuousLinearMap (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (LinearMap.adjoint A) =
ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
theorem adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
LinearMap.adjoint A = ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap A) :=
rfl
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_left (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪adjoint A y, x⟫ = ⟪y, A x⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_left _ x y
/-- The fundamental property of the adjoint. -/
theorem adjoint_inner_right (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (x : E) (y : F) : ⟪x, adjoint A y⟫ = ⟪A x, y⟫ := by
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 E
haveI := FiniteDimensional.complete 𝕜 F
rw [← coe_toContinuousLinearMap A, adjoint_eq_toCLM_adjoint]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.adjoint_inner_right _ x y
/-- The adjoint is involutive. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_adjoint (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : LinearMap.adjoint (LinearMap.adjoint A) = A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
rw [adjoint_inner_right, adjoint_inner_left]
/-- The adjoint of the composition of two operators is the composition of the two adjoints
in reverse order. -/
@[simp]
theorem adjoint_comp (A : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (B : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
LinearMap.adjoint (A ∘ₗ B) = LinearMap.adjoint B ∘ₗ LinearMap.adjoint A := by
ext v
refine ext_inner_left 𝕜 fun w => ?_
simp only [adjoint_inner_right, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ x y, ⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h x y]
/-- The adjoint is unique: a map `A` is the adjoint of `B` iff it satisfies `⟪A x, y⟫ = ⟪x, B y⟫`
for all basis vectors `x` and `y`. -/
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis {ι₁ : Type*} {ι₂ : Type*} (b₁ : Basis ι₁ 𝕜 E) (b₂ : Basis ι₂ 𝕜 F)
(A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ (i₁ : ι₁) (i₂ : ι₂), ⟪A (b₁ i₁), b₂ i₂⟫ = ⟪b₁ i₁, B (b₂ i₂)⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
refine Basis.ext b₁ fun i₁ => ?_
exact ext_inner_right_basis b₂ fun i₂ => by simp only [adjoint_inner_left, h i₁ i₂]
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis_left {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι 𝕜 E) (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ i y, ⟪A (b i), y⟫ = ⟪b i, B y⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => Basis.ext b fun i => ?_⟩
exact ext_inner_right 𝕜 fun y => by simp only [h i, adjoint_inner_left]
theorem eq_adjoint_iff_basis_right {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι 𝕜 F) (A : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (B : F →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
| A = LinearMap.adjoint B ↔ ∀ i x, ⟪A x, b i⟫ = ⟪x, B (b i)⟫ := by
refine ⟨fun h x y => by rw [h, adjoint_inner_left], fun h => ?_⟩
ext x
exact ext_inner_right_basis b fun i => by simp only [h i, adjoint_inner_left]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Adjoint.lean | 398 | 401 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ZLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.ProdL2
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.FractionalIdeal
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Units.Basic
/-!
# Canonical embedding of a number field
The canonical embedding of a number field `K` of degree `n` is the ring homomorphism
`K →+* ℂ^n` that sends `x ∈ K` to `(φ_₁(x),...,φ_n(x))` where the `φ_i`'s are the complex
embeddings of `K`. Note that we do not choose an ordering of the embeddings, but instead map `K`
into the type `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ` of `ℂ`-vectors indexed by the complex embeddings.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.canonicalEmbedding`: the ring homomorphism `K →+* ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)` defined by
sending `x : K` to the vector `(φ x)` indexed by `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
* `NumberField.canonicalEmbedding.integerLattice.inter_ball_finite`: the intersection of the
image of the ring of integers by the canonical embedding and any ball centered at `0` of finite
radius is finite.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding`: the ring homomorphism from `K` to the mixed space
`K →+* ({ w // IsReal w } → ℝ) × ({ w // IsComplex w } → ℂ)` that sends `x ∈ K` to `(φ_w x)_w`
where `φ_w` is the embedding associated to the infinite place `w`. In particular, if `w` is real
then `φ_w : K →+* ℝ` and, if `w` is complex, `φ_w` is an arbitrary choice between the two complex
embeddings defining the place `w`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.canonicalEmbedding
/-- The canonical embedding of a number field `K` of degree `n` into `ℂ^n`. -/
def _root_.NumberField.canonicalEmbedding : K →+* ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) := Pi.ringHom fun φ => φ
theorem _root_.NumberField.canonicalEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.canonicalEmbedding K) := RingHom.injective _
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem apply_at (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (NumberField.canonicalEmbedding K x) φ = φ x := rfl
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The image of `canonicalEmbedding` lives in the `ℝ`-submodule of the `x ∈ ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)` such
that `conj x_φ = x_(conj φ)` for all `∀ φ : K →+* ℂ`. -/
theorem conj_apply {x : ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)} (φ : K →+* ℂ)
(hx : x ∈ Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding K))) :
conj (x φ) = x (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ) := by
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => ?_) (fun a _ _ hx => ?_) hx
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [apply_at, apply_at, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq]
· rw [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply, map_zero]
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, map_add, hx, hy]
· rw [Pi.smul_apply, Complex.real_smul, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal]
exact congrArg ((a : ℂ) * ·) hx
theorem nnnorm_eq [NumberField K] (x : K) :
‖canonicalEmbedding K x‖₊ = Finset.univ.sup (fun φ : K →+* ℂ => ‖φ x‖₊) := by
simp_rw [Pi.nnnorm_def, apply_at]
theorem norm_le_iff [NumberField K] (x : K) (r : ℝ) :
‖canonicalEmbedding K x‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r := by
obtain hr | hr := lt_or_le r 0
· obtain ⟨φ⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (K →+* ℂ))
refine iff_of_false ?_ ?_
· exact (hr.trans_le (norm_nonneg _)).not_le
· exact fun h => hr.not_le (le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h φ))
· lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_eq, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, Finset.mem_univ,
forall_true_left]
variable (K)
/-- The image of `𝓞 K` as a subring of `ℂ^n`. -/
def integerLattice : Subring ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) :=
(RingHom.range (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).map (canonicalEmbedding K)
theorem integerLattice.inter_ball_finite [NumberField K] (r : ℝ) :
((integerLattice K : Set ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)) ∩ Metric.closedBall 0 r).Finite := by
obtain hr | _ := lt_or_le r 0
· simp [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty.2 hr]
· have heq : ∀ x, canonicalEmbedding K x ∈ Metric.closedBall 0 r ↔
∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r := by
intro x; rw [← norm_le_iff, mem_closedBall_zero_iff]
convert (Embeddings.finite_of_norm_le K ℂ r).image (canonicalEmbedding K)
ext; constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨SetLike.coe_mem x, fun φ => (heq _).mp hx φ⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨hx1, hx2⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟨x, hx1⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, (heq x).mpr hx2⟩
open Module Fintype Module
/-- A `ℂ`-basis of `ℂ^n` that is also a `ℤ`-basis of the `integerLattice`. -/
noncomputable def latticeBasis [NumberField K] :
Basis (Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) ℂ ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) := by
classical
-- Let `B` be the canonical basis of `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ`. We prove that the determinant of
-- the image by `canonicalEmbedding` of the integral basis of `K` is nonzero. This
-- will imply the result.
let B := Pi.basisFun ℂ (K →+* ℂ)
let e : (K →+* ℂ) ≃ Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
equivOfCardEq ((Embeddings.card K ℂ).trans (finrank_eq_card_basis (integralBasis K)))
let M := B.toMatrix (fun i => canonicalEmbedding K (integralBasis K (e i)))
suffices M.det ≠ 0 by
rw [← isUnit_iff_ne_zero, ← Basis.det_apply, ← is_basis_iff_det] at this
exact (basisOfPiSpaceOfLinearIndependent this.1).reindex e
-- In order to prove that the determinant is nonzero, we show that it is equal to the
-- square of the discriminant of the integral basis and thus it is not zero
let N := Algebra.embeddingsMatrixReindex ℚ ℂ (fun i => integralBasis K (e i))
RingHom.equivRatAlgHom
rw [show M = N.transpose by { ext : 2; rfl }]
rw [Matrix.det_transpose, ← pow_ne_zero_iff two_ne_zero]
convert (map_ne_zero_iff _ (algebraMap ℚ ℂ).injective).mpr
(Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis ℚ (integralBasis K))
rw [← Algebra.discr_reindex ℚ (integralBasis K) e.symm]
exact (Algebra.discr_eq_det_embeddingsMatrixReindex_pow_two ℚ ℂ
(fun i => integralBasis K (e i)) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom).symm
@[simp]
theorem latticeBasis_apply [NumberField K] (i : Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
latticeBasis K i = (canonicalEmbedding K) (integralBasis K i) := by
simp [latticeBasis, integralBasis_apply, coe_basisOfPiSpaceOfLinearIndependent,
Function.comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem mem_span_latticeBasis [NumberField K] {x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ} :
x ∈ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) ↔
x ∈ ((canonicalEmbedding K).comp (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).range := by
rw [show Set.range (latticeBasis K) =
(canonicalEmbedding K).toIntAlgHom.toLinearMap '' (Set.range (integralBasis K)) by
rw [← Set.range_comp]; exact congrArg Set.range (funext (fun i => latticeBasis_apply K i))]
rw [← Submodule.map_span, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.map_coe]
rw [← RingHom.map_range, Subring.mem_map, Set.mem_image]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_span_integralBasis K]
rfl
theorem mem_rat_span_latticeBasis [NumberField K] (x : K) :
canonicalEmbedding K x ∈ Submodule.span ℚ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) := by
rw [← Basis.sum_repr (integralBasis K) x, map_sum]
simp_rw [map_rat_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_smul_mem _ _ (fun i _ ↦ Submodule.subset_span ?_)
rw [← latticeBasis_apply]
exact Set.mem_range_self i
theorem integralBasis_repr_apply [NumberField K] (x : K) (i : Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
(latticeBasis K).repr (canonicalEmbedding K x) i = (integralBasis K).repr x i := by
rw [← Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply ℚ _ ⟨_, mem_rat_span_latticeBasis K x⟩, eq_ratCast,
Rat.cast_inj]
let f := (canonicalEmbedding K).toRatAlgHom.toLinearMap.codRestrict _
(fun x ↦ mem_rat_span_latticeBasis K x)
suffices ((latticeBasis K).restrictScalars ℚ).repr.toLinearMap ∘ₗ f =
(integralBasis K).repr.toLinearMap from DFunLike.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun this x) i
refine Basis.ext (integralBasis K) (fun i ↦ ?_)
have : f (integralBasis K i) = ((latticeBasis K).restrictScalars ℚ) i := by
apply Subtype.val_injective
rw [LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, Basis.restrictScalars_apply,
latticeBasis_apply]
rfl
simp_rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, this, Basis.repr_self]
end NumberField.canonicalEmbedding
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField.InfinitePlace Module Finset
/-- The mixed space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` with `(r₁, r₂)` the signature of `K`. -/
abbrev mixedSpace :=
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
/-- The mixed embedding of a number field `K` into the mixed space of `K`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding : K →+* (mixedSpace K) :=
RingHom.prod (Pi.ringHom fun w => embedding_of_isReal w.prop)
(Pi.ringHom fun w => w.val.embedding)
@[simp]
theorem mixedEmbedding_apply_isReal (x : K) (w : {w // IsReal w}) :
(mixedEmbedding K x).1 w = embedding_of_isReal w.prop x := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mixedEmbedding_apply_isComplex (x : K) (w : {w // IsComplex w}) :
(mixedEmbedding K x).2 w = w.val.embedding x := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias mixedEmbedding_apply_ofIsReal :=
mixedEmbedding_apply_isReal
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias mixedEmbedding_apply_ofIsComplex :=
mixedEmbedding_apply_isComplex
instance [NumberField K] : Nontrivial (mixedSpace K) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
obtain hw | hw := w.isReal_or_isComplex
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_left
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_right
protected theorem finrank [NumberField K] : finrank ℝ (mixedSpace K) = finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [finrank_prod, finrank_pi, finrank_pi_fintype, Complex.finrank_real_complex, sum_const,
card_univ, ← nrRealPlaces, ← nrComplexPlaces, ← card_real_embeddings, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm, ← card_complex_embeddings, ← NumberField.Embeddings.card K ℂ,
Fintype.card_subtype_compl, Nat.add_sub_of_le (Fintype.card_subtype_le _)]
theorem _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.mixedEmbedding K) := by
exact RingHom.injective _
section Measure
open MeasureTheory.Measure MeasureTheory
variable [NumberField K]
open Classical in
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (mixedSpace K)) :=
prod.instIsAddHaarMeasure volume volume
open Classical in
instance : NoAtoms (volume : Measure (mixedSpace K)) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
by_cases hw : IsReal w
· have : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ)) := pi_noAtoms ⟨w, hw⟩
exact prod.instNoAtoms_fst
· have : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)) :=
pi_noAtoms ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩
exact prod.instNoAtoms_snd
variable {K} in
open Classical in
/-- The set of points in the mixedSpace that are equal to `0` at a fixed (real) place has
volume zero. -/
theorem volume_eq_zero (w : {w // IsReal w}) :
volume ({x : mixedSpace K | x.1 w = 0}) = 0 := by
let A : AffineSubspace ℝ (mixedSpace K) :=
Submodule.toAffineSubspace (Submodule.mk ⟨⟨{x | x.1 w = 0}, by aesop⟩, rfl⟩ (by aesop))
convert Measure.addHaar_affineSubspace volume A fun h ↦ ?_
simpa [A] using (h ▸ Set.mem_univ _ : 1 ∈ A)
end Measure
section commMap
/-- The linear map that makes `canonicalEmbedding` and `mixedEmbedding` commute, see
`commMap_canonical_eq_mixed`. -/
noncomputable def commMap : ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) →ₗ[ℝ] (mixedSpace K) where
toFun := fun x => ⟨fun w => (x w.val.embedding).re, fun w => x w.val.embedding⟩
map_add' := by
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Complex.add_re, Prod.mk_add_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact fun _ _ => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
map_smul' := by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Complex.real_smul, Complex.mul_re, Complex.ofReal_re,
Complex.ofReal_im, zero_mul, sub_zero, RingHom.id_apply, Prod.smul_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact fun _ _ => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem commMap_apply_of_isReal (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) :
(commMap K x).1 ⟨w, hw⟩ = (x w.embedding).re := rfl
theorem commMap_apply_of_isComplex (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) :
(commMap K x).2 ⟨w, hw⟩ = x w.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem commMap_canonical_eq_mixed (x : K) :
commMap K (canonicalEmbedding K x) = mixedEmbedding K x := by
simp only [canonicalEmbedding, commMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, Pi.ringHom_apply,
mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
/-- This is a technical result to ensure that the image of the `ℂ`-basis of `ℂ^n` defined in
`canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis` is a `ℝ`-basis of the mixed space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`,
see `mixedEmbedding.latticeBasis`. -/
theorem disjoint_span_commMap_ker [NumberField K] :
Disjoint (Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis K)))
(LinearMap.ker (commMap K)) := by
refine LinearMap.disjoint_ker.mpr (fun x h_mem h_zero => ?_)
replace h_mem : x ∈ Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding K)) := by
refine (Submodule.span_mono ?_) h_mem
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨integralBasis K i, (canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis_apply K i).symm⟩
ext1 φ
rw [Pi.zero_apply]
by_cases hφ : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ
· apply Complex.ext
· rw [← embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ, ← commMap_apply_of_isReal K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
exact congrFun (congrArg (fun x => x.1) h_zero) ⟨InfinitePlace.mk φ, _⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_im, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im, canonicalEmbedding.conj_apply _ h_mem,
ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp hφ]
· have := congrFun (congrArg (fun x => x.2) h_zero) ⟨InfinitePlace.mk φ, ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩⟩
cases embedding_mk_eq φ with
| inl h => rwa [← h, ← commMap_apply_of_isComplex K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
| inr h =>
apply RingHom.injective (starRingEnd ℂ)
rwa [canonicalEmbedding.conj_apply _ h_mem, ← h, map_zero,
← commMap_apply_of_isComplex K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
end commMap
noncomputable section norm
variable {K}
open scoped Classical in
/-- The norm at the infinite place `w` of an element of the mixed space -/
def normAtPlace (w : InfinitePlace K) : (mixedSpace K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := if hw : IsReal w then ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ else ‖x.2 ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩‖
map_zero' := by simp
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' x y := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_nonneg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : mixedSpace K) :
0 ≤ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_nonneg _
theorem normAtPlace_neg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w (- x) = normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_add_le (w : InfinitePlace K) (x y : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w (x + y) ≤ normAtPlace w x + normAtPlace w y := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_add_le _ _
theorem normAtPlace_smul (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : mixedSpace K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w (c • x) = |c| * normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_real (w : InfinitePlace K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (mixedSpace K)) = |c| := by
rw [show ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (mixedSpace K)) = c • 1 by ext <;> simp, normAtPlace_smul,
map_one, mul_one]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, dif_pos]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) (x : mixedSpace K) :
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.2 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
dif_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr hw)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias normAtPlace_apply_isReal := normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias normAtPlace_apply_isComplex :=
normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex
@[simp]
theorem normAtPlace_apply (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
normAtPlace w (mixedEmbedding K x) = w x := by
simp_rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, mixedEmbedding,
RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply, norm_embedding_of_isReal, norm_embedding_eq, dite_eq_ite,
ite_id]
theorem forall_normAtPlace_eq_zero_iff {x : mixedSpace K} :
(∀ w, normAtPlace w x = 0) ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· ext w
· exact norm_eq_zero.mp (normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· exact norm_eq_zero.mp (normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· simp_rw [h, map_zero, implies_true]
@[simp]
theorem exists_normAtPlace_ne_zero_iff {x : mixedSpace K} :
(∃ w, normAtPlace w x ≠ 0) ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, ← forall_normAtPlace_eq_zero_iff, not_forall]
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuous_normAtPlace (w : InfinitePlace K) :
Continuous (normAtPlace w) := by
simp_rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> fun_prop
variable [NumberField K]
open scoped Classical in
theorem nnnorm_eq_sup_normAtPlace (x : mixedSpace K) :
‖x‖₊ = univ.sup fun w ↦ ⟨normAtPlace w x, normAtPlace_nonneg w x⟩ := by
have :
(univ : Finset (InfinitePlace K)) =
(univ.image (fun w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} ↦ w.1)) ∪
(univ.image (fun w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} ↦ w.1)) := by
ext; simp [isReal_or_isComplex]
rw [this, sup_union, univ.sup_image, univ.sup_image,
Prod.nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr
· ext w
simp [normAtPlace_apply_of_isReal w.prop]
· ext w
simp [normAtPlace_apply_of_isComplex w.prop]
open scoped Classical in
theorem norm_eq_sup'_normAtPlace (x : mixedSpace K) :
‖x‖ = univ.sup' univ_nonempty fun w ↦ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_eq_sup_normAtPlace, ← sup'_eq_sup univ_nonempty, ← NNReal.val_eq_coe,
← OrderHom.Subtype.val_coe, map_finset_sup', OrderHom.Subtype.val_coe]
simp only [Function.comp_apply]
/-- The norm of `x` is `∏ w, (normAtPlace x) ^ mult w`. It is defined such that the norm of
`mixedEmbedding K a` for `a : K` is equal to the absolute value of the norm of `a` over `ℚ`,
see `norm_eq_norm`. -/
protected def norm : (mixedSpace K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := ∏ w, (normAtPlace w x) ^ (mult w)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_pow, prod_const_one]
map_zero' := by simp [mult]
map_mul' _ _ := by simp only [map_mul, mul_pow, prod_mul_distrib]
protected theorem norm_apply (x : mixedSpace K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = ∏ w, (normAtPlace w x) ^ (mult w) := rfl
protected theorem norm_nonneg (x : mixedSpace K) :
0 ≤ mixedEmbedding.norm x := univ.prod_nonneg fun _ _ ↦ pow_nonneg (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _) _
protected theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {x : mixedSpace K} :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = 0 ↔ ∃ w, normAtPlace w x = 0 := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, prod_eq_zero_iff,
mem_univ, true_and, pow_eq_zero_iff mult_ne_zero]
protected theorem norm_ne_zero_iff {x : mixedSpace K} :
mixedEmbedding.norm x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ w, normAtPlace w x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp_rw [ne_eq, mixedEmbedding.norm_eq_zero_iff, not_not, not_forall, not_not]
theorem norm_eq_of_normAtPlace_eq {x y : mixedSpace K}
(h : ∀ w, normAtPlace w x = normAtPlace w y) :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = mixedEmbedding.norm y := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm_apply, h]
theorem norm_smul (c : ℝ) (x : mixedSpace K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm (c • x) = |c| ^ finrank ℚ K * (mixedEmbedding.norm x) := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm_apply, normAtPlace_smul, mul_pow, prod_mul_distrib,
prod_pow_eq_pow_sum, sum_mult_eq]
theorem norm_real (c : ℝ) :
mixedEmbedding.norm ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (mixedSpace K)) = |c| ^ finrank ℚ K := by
rw [show ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (mixedSpace K)) = c • 1 by ext <;> simp, norm_smul, map_one,
mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_norm (x : K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm (mixedEmbedding K x) = |Algebra.norm ℚ x| := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm_apply, normAtPlace_apply, prod_eq_abs_norm]
theorem norm_unit (u : (𝓞 K)ˣ) :
mixedEmbedding.norm (mixedEmbedding K u) = 1 := by
rw [norm_eq_norm, Units.norm, Rat.cast_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff' {x : mixedSpace K} (hx : x ∈ Set.range (mixedEmbedding K)) :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hx
rw [norm_eq_norm, Rat.cast_abs, abs_eq_zero, Rat.cast_eq_zero, Algebra.norm_eq_zero_iff,
map_eq_zero]
variable (K) in
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem continuous_norm : Continuous (mixedEmbedding.norm : (mixedSpace K) → ℝ) := by
refine continuous_finset_prod Finset.univ fun _ _ ↦ ?_
simp_rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, dite_pow]
split_ifs <;> fun_prop
end norm
noncomputable section stdBasis
open Complex MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure ZSpan Matrix ComplexConjugate
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The type indexing the basis `stdBasis`. -/
abbrev index := {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} ⊕ ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) × (Fin 2)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The `ℝ`-basis of the mixed space of `K` formed by the vector equal to `1` at `w` and `0`
elsewhere for `IsReal w` and by the couple of vectors equal to `1` (resp. `I`) at `w` and `0`
elsewhere for `IsComplex w`. -/
def stdBasis : Basis (index K) ℝ (mixedSpace K) :=
Basis.prod (Pi.basisFun ℝ _)
(Basis.reindex (Pi.basis fun _ => basisOneI) (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _))
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply_isReal (x : mixedSpace K) (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w}) :
(stdBasis K).repr x (Sum.inl w) = x.1 w := rfl
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply_isComplex_fst (x : mixedSpace K)
(w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(stdBasis K).repr x (Sum.inr ⟨w, 0⟩) = (x.2 w).re := rfl
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply_isComplex_snd (x : mixedSpace K)
(w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(stdBasis K).repr x (Sum.inr ⟨w, 1⟩) = (x.2 w).im := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias stdBasis_apply_ofIsReal := stdBasis_apply_isReal
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias stdBasis_apply_ofIsComplex_fst :=
stdBasis_apply_isComplex_fst
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias stdBasis_apply_ofIsComplex_snd :=
stdBasis_apply_isComplex_snd
variable (K)
open scoped Classical in
theorem fundamentalDomain_stdBasis :
fundamentalDomain (stdBasis K) =
(Set.univ.pi fun _ => Set.Ico 0 1) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi fun _ => Complex.measurableEquivPi⁻¹' (Set.univ.pi fun _ => Set.Ico 0 1)) := by
ext
simp [stdBasis, mem_fundamentalDomain, Complex.measurableEquivPi]
open scoped Classical in
theorem volume_fundamentalDomain_stdBasis :
volume (fundamentalDomain (stdBasis K)) = 1 := by
rw [fundamentalDomain_stdBasis, volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, volume_pi, pi_pi, pi_pi,
Complex.volume_preserving_equiv_pi.measure_preimage ?_, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_Ico,
sub_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_one, prod_const_one, prod_const_one, prod_const_one, one_mul]
exact (MeasurableSet.pi Set.countable_univ (fun _ _ => measurableSet_Ico)).nullMeasurableSet
open scoped Classical in
/-- The `Equiv` between `index K` and `K →+* ℂ` defined by sending a real infinite place `w` to
the unique corresponding embedding `w.embedding`, and the pair `⟨w, 0⟩` (resp. `⟨w, 1⟩`) for a
complex infinite place `w` to `w.embedding` (resp. `conjugate w.embedding`). -/
def indexEquiv : (index K) ≃ (K →+* ℂ) := by
refine Equiv.ofBijective (fun c => ?_)
((Fintype.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card _).mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· cases c with
| inl w => exact w.val.embedding
| inr wj => rcases wj with ⟨w, j⟩
exact if j = 0 then w.val.embedding else ComplexEmbedding.conjugate w.val.embedding
· intro φ
by_cases hφ : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ
· exact ⟨Sum.inl (InfinitePlace.mkReal ⟨φ, hφ⟩), by simp [embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ]⟩
· by_cases hw : (InfinitePlace.mk φ).embedding = φ
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨InfinitePlace.mkComplex ⟨φ, hφ⟩, 0⟩, by simp [hw]⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨InfinitePlace.mkComplex ⟨φ, hφ⟩, 1⟩,
by simp [(embedding_mk_eq φ).resolve_left hw]⟩
· rw [Embeddings.card, ← mixedEmbedding.finrank K,
← Module.finrank_eq_card_basis (stdBasis K)]
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem indexEquiv_apply_isReal (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w}) :
(indexEquiv K) (Sum.inl w) = w.val.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexEquiv_apply_isComplex_fst (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(indexEquiv K) (Sum.inr ⟨w, 0⟩) = w.val.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexEquiv_apply_isComplex_snd (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(indexEquiv K) (Sum.inr ⟨w, 1⟩) = ComplexEmbedding.conjugate w.val.embedding := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias indexEquiv_apply_ofIsReal := indexEquiv_apply_isReal
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias indexEquiv_apply_ofIsComplex_fst :=
indexEquiv_apply_isComplex_fst
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias indexEquiv_apply_ofIsComplex_snd :=
indexEquiv_apply_isComplex_snd
variable (K)
|
open scoped Classical in
/-- The matrix that gives the representation on `stdBasis` of the image by `commMap` of an
element `x` of `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ` fixed by the map `x_φ ↦ conj x_(conjugate φ)`,
see `stdBasis_repr_eq_matrixToStdBasis_mul`. -/
def matrixToStdBasis : Matrix (index K) (index K) ℂ :=
fromBlocks (diagonal fun _ => 1) 0 0 <| reindex (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _)
(blockDiagonal (fun _ => (2 : ℂ)⁻¹ • !![1, 1; - I, I]))
open scoped Classical in
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/Basic.lean | 576 | 585 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_cancel]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
exact mod_cast Complex.arg_real_mul _ (by positivity : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2)
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by
simp [oangle, mul_comm z]
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.norm_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle between two vectors is zero, either one of the vectors is
zero or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V}
(h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 0) :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h) <;> simp [h, Real.pi_pos.le]
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V}
(h : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z)
(hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) : o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
by_cases h0 : (w = 0 ∨ x = 0) ∨ y = 0 ∨ z = 0
· have hs' : (o.oangle w x).sign = 0 ∧ (o.oangle y z).sign = 0 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs
· simpa using hs
rcases hs' with ⟨hswx, hsyz⟩
have h' : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = π / 2 ∧ InnerProductGeometry.angle y z = π / 2 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h
· simpa using h
rcases h' with ⟨hwx, hyz⟩
have hpi : π / 2 ≠ π := by
intro hpi
rw [div_eq_iff, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, mul_two, add_sub_cancel_right] at hpi
· exact Real.pi_pos.ne.symm hpi
· exact two_ne_zero
have h0wx : w = 0 ∨ x = 0 := by
| have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hswx
simpa [hwx, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 616 | 617 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Opposites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file gives lemmas about semirings, rings and domains.
This is analogous to `Algebra.Group.Basic`,
the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
For the definitions of semirings and rings see `Algebra.Ring.Defs`.
-/
variable {R : Type*}
open Function
namespace AddHom
/-- Left multiplication by an element of a type with distributive multiplication is an `AddHom`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def mulLeft [Distrib R] (r : R) : AddHom R R where
toFun := (r * ·)
map_add' := mul_add r
/-- Left multiplication by an element of a type with distributive multiplication is an `AddHom`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def mulRight [Distrib R] (r : R) : AddHom R R where
toFun a := a * r
map_add' _ _ := add_mul _ _ r
end AddHom
namespace AddMonoidHom
/-- Left multiplication by an element of a (semi)ring is an `AddMonoidHom` -/
def mulLeft [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (r : R) : R →+ R where
toFun := (r * ·)
map_zero' := mul_zero r
map_add' := mul_add r
@[simp]
theorem coe_mulLeft [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (r : R) :
(mulLeft r : R → R) = HMul.hMul r :=
rfl
/-- Right multiplication by an element of a (semi)ring is an `AddMonoidHom` -/
def mulRight [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (r : R) : R →+ R where
toFun a := a * r
map_zero' := zero_mul r
map_add' _ _ := add_mul _ _ r
@[simp]
theorem coe_mulRight [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (r : R) :
(mulRight r) = (· * r) :=
rfl
theorem mulRight_apply [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (a r : R) :
mulRight r a = a * r :=
rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section HasDistribNeg
section Mul
variable {α : Type*} [Mul α] [HasDistribNeg α]
open MulOpposite
instance MulOpposite.instHasDistribNeg : HasDistribNeg αᵐᵒᵖ where
neg_mul _ _ := unop_injective <| mul_neg _ _
mul_neg _ _ := unop_injective <| neg_mul _ _
end Mul
end HasDistribNeg
section NonUnitalCommRing
variable {α : Type*} [NonUnitalCommRing α]
attribute [local simp] add_assoc add_comm add_left_comm mul_comm
/-- Vieta's formula for a quadratic equation, relating the coefficients of the polynomial with
its roots. This particular version states that if we have a root `x` of a monic quadratic
polynomial, then there is another root `y` such that `x + y` is negative the `a_1` coefficient
and `x * y` is the `a_0` coefficient. -/
theorem vieta_formula_quadratic {b c x : α} (h : x * x - b * x + c = 0) :
∃ y : α, y * y - b * y + c = 0 ∧ x + y = b ∧ x * y = c := by
have : c = x * (b - x) := (eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right h).trans (by simp [mul_sub, mul_comm])
refine ⟨b - x, ?_, by simp, by rw [this]⟩
rw [this, sub_add, ← sub_mul, sub_self]
end NonUnitalCommRing
theorem succ_ne_self {α : Type*} [NonAssocRing α] [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : a + 1 ≠ a := fun h =>
one_ne_zero ((add_right_inj a).mp (by simp [h]))
theorem pred_ne_self {α : Type*} [NonAssocRing α] [Nontrivial α] (a : α) : a - 1 ≠ a := fun h ↦
one_ne_zero (neg_injective ((add_right_inj a).mp (by simp [← sub_eq_add_neg, h])))
section NoZeroDivisors
variable (α)
lemma IsLeftCancelMulZero.to_noZeroDivisors [MulZeroClass α]
[IsLeftCancelMulZero α] : NoZeroDivisors α where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {x _} h :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ne ↦ mul_left_cancel₀ ne ((mul_zero x).symm ▸ h)
lemma IsRightCancelMulZero.to_noZeroDivisors [MulZeroClass α]
[IsRightCancelMulZero α] : NoZeroDivisors α where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {_ y} h :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun ne ↦ mul_right_cancel₀ ne ((zero_mul y).symm ▸ h)
instance (priority := 100) NoZeroDivisors.to_isCancelMulZero
[NonUnitalNonAssocRing α] [NoZeroDivisors α] :
IsCancelMulZero α where
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero ha h := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h
exact sub_eq_zero.1 ((eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).resolve_left ha)
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero hb h := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_mul] at h
exact sub_eq_zero.1 ((eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).resolve_right hb)
/-- In a ring, `IsCancelMulZero` and `NoZeroDivisors` are equivalent. -/
lemma isCancelMulZero_iff_noZeroDivisors [NonUnitalNonAssocRing α] :
IsCancelMulZero α ↔ NoZeroDivisors α :=
⟨fun _ => IsRightCancelMulZero.to_noZeroDivisors _, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
lemma NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain [Ring α] [h : Nontrivial α] [NoZeroDivisors α] :
IsDomain α :=
| { NoZeroDivisors.to_isCancelMulZero α, h with .. }
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Basic.lean | 144 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
/-!
# Convexity of functions and derivatives
Here we relate convexity of functions `ℝ → ℝ` to properties of their derivatives.
## Main results
* `MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv`, `convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg` : if the derivative of a function
is increasing or its second derivative is nonnegative, then the original function is convex.
* `ConvexOn.monotoneOn_deriv`: if a function is convex and differentiable, then its derivative is
monotone.
-/
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-!
## Monotonicity of `f'` implies convexity of `f`
-/
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is monotone on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(hf'_mono : MonotoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
convexOn_of_slope_mono_adjacent hD
(by
intro x y z hx hz hxy hyz
-- First we prove some trivial inclusions
have hxzD : Icc x z ⊆ D := hD.ordConnected.out hx hz
have hxyD : Icc x y ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_right hyz.le).trans hxzD
have hxyD' : Ioo x y ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hxyD⟩
have hyzD : Icc y z ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_left hxy.le).trans hxzD
have hyzD' : Ioo y z ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hyzD⟩
-- Then we apply MVT to both `[x, y]` and `[y, z]`
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy (hf.mono hxyD) (hf'.mono hxyD')
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hyb, hbz⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo y z, deriv f b = (f z - f y) / (z - y) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hyz (hf.mono hyzD) (hf'.mono hyzD')
rw [← ha, ← hb]
exact hf'_mono (hxyD' ⟨hxa, hay⟩) (hyzD' ⟨hyb, hbz⟩) (hay.trans hyb).le)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is antitone on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.concaveOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(h_anti : AntitoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
haveI : MonotoneOn (deriv (-f)) (interior D) := by
simpa only [← deriv.neg] using h_anti.neg
neg_convexOn_iff.mp (this.convexOn_of_deriv hD hf.neg hf'.neg)
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) (h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a := by
have A : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo x y) := fun w wmem =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h w wmem)).differentiableWithinAt
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy hf A
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hay with ⟨b, ⟨hab, hby⟩⟩
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxa.trans hab, hby⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← ha]
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, hay⟩ ⟨hxa.trans hab, hby⟩ hab
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a := by
by_cases h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0
· apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux hf hxy hf'_mono h
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨w, ⟨hxw, hwy⟩, hw⟩
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x w, (f w - f x) / (w - x) < deriv f a := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux _ hxw _ _
· exact hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl hwy.le)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl hwy.le)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_lt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ hz.2
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hwb, hby⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo w y, (f y - f w) / (y - w) < deriv f b := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux _ hwy _ _
· refine hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc hxw.le le_rfl)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo hxw.le le_rfl)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_gt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩ hz.1
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [div_lt_iff₀, hxy, hxw, hwy, sub_pos] at ha hb ⊢
have : deriv f a * (w - x) < deriv f b * (w - x) := by
apply mul_lt_mul _ le_rfl (sub_pos.2 hxw) _
· exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ (haw.trans hwb)
· rw [← hw]
exact (hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ hwb).le
linarith
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) (h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a < (f y - f x) / (y - x) := by
have A : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo x y) := fun w wmem =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h w wmem)).differentiableWithinAt
| obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy hf A
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hxa with ⟨b, ⟨hxb, hba⟩⟩
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxb, hba.trans hay⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← ha]
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxb, hba.trans hay⟩ ⟨hxa, hay⟩ hba
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a < (f y - f x) / (y - x) := by
by_cases h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Deriv.lean | 111 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
/-!
# Further lemmas about normed groups
This file contains further lemmas about normed groups, requiring heavier imports than
`Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean`.
## TODO
- Move lemmas from `Basic` to other places, including this file.
-/
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E]
open NNReal Topology
theorem eventually_nnnorm_sub_lt (x₀ : E) {ε : ℝ≥0} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ‖x - x₀‖₊ < ε :=
(continuousAt_id.sub continuousAt_const).nnnorm (gt_mem_nhds <| by simpa)
theorem eventually_norm_sub_lt (x₀ : E) {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) :
| ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ‖x - x₀‖ < ε :=
(continuousAt_id.sub continuousAt_const).norm (gt_mem_nhds <| by simpa)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Lemmas.lean | 28 | 30 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_or_and_not_and (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (¬ (a ∧ b)) := by
rw [Xor', or_and_right, not_and_or, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, false_or,
and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false]
end Propositional
/-! ### Membership -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
section Membership
variable {α β : Type*} [Membership α β] {p : Prop} [Decidable p]
theorem mem_dite {a : α} {s : p → β} {t : ¬p → β} :
(a ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h, a ∈ s h) ∧ (∀ h, a ∈ t h) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem dite_mem {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → α} {s : β} :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ∈ s ↔ (∀ h, a h ∈ s) ∧ (∀ h, b h ∈ s) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem mem_ite {a : α} {s t : β} : (a ∈ if p then s else t) ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → a ∈ t) :=
mem_dite
theorem ite_mem {a b : α} {s : β} : (if p then a else b) ∈ s ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → b ∈ s) :=
dite_mem
end Membership
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β}
(e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) : HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_heq_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : α = β) (a : α) (c : γ) :
HEq (cast e a) c ↔ HEq a c := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem heq_cast_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : β = γ) (a : α) (b : β) :
HEq a (cast e b) ↔ HEq a b := by subst e; rfl
universe u
variable {α β : Sort u} {e : β = α} {a : α} {b : β}
lemma heq_of_eq_cast (e : β = α) : a = cast e b → HEq a b := by rintro rfl; simp
lemma eq_cast_iff_heq : a = cast e b ↔ HEq a b := ⟨heq_of_eq_cast _, fun h ↦ by cases h; rfl⟩
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*}
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun f x y ↦ f y x, fun f x y ↦ f y x⟩
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
lemma imp_forall_iff_forall (A : Prop) (B : A → Prop) :
(A → ∀ h : A, B h) ↔ ∀ h : A, B h := by by_cases h : A <;> simp [h]
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem exists_and_exists_comm {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} :
(∃ a, P a) ∧ (∃ b, Q b) ↔ ∃ a b, P a ∧ Q b :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩, fun ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩⟩
export Classical (not_forall)
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
classical
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_forall_ne a
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
/--
The constant function witnesses that
there exists a function sending a given term to a given term.
This is sometimes useful in `simp` to discharge side conditions.
-/
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
| (∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 595 | 596 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [continuousOn_iff']
constructor
· intro h t ht
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu]
apply IsOpen.inter u_open hs
· intro h t ht
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, ?_⟩
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self]
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
(continuousOn_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_preimage {t : Set β} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hp : f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) := by
convert (continuousOn_open_iff hs).mp h t ht
rw [inter_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hp]
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rcases continuousOn_iff_isClosed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu.2]
apply IsClosed.inter hu.1 hs
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
calc
s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter (Subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
(hf.isOpen_inter_preimage hs isOpen_interior)
_ = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) := by rw [interior_inter, hs.interior_eq]
theorem continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ContinuousOn f (s ∩ t)) : ContinuousOn f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩
rwa [ContinuousWithinAt, ← nhdsWithin_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
theorem continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ T, f x ∈ t → f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
forall₂_congr fun x _ => by
delta ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun t => forall_swap
theorem continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ T, IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t)) :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s :=
continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff.2 fun _x hx t ht hxt => mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨_, h t ht, ⟨hx, hxt⟩, fun _y hy => hy.1.2⟩
/-!
### Congruence and monotonicity properties with respect to sets
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
/-- If two sets coincide around `x`, then being continuous within one or the other at `x` is
equivalent. See also `continuousWithinAt_congr_set'` which requires that the sets coincide
locally away from a point `y`, in a T1 space. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq.mpr h]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_set (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f t x :=
(continuousWithinAt_congr_set h).1 hf
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_union :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
/- `continuousWithinAt_insert` gives the same equivalence but at a point `y` possibly different
from `x`. As this requires the space to be T1, and this property is not available in this file,
this is found in another file although it is part of the basic API for `continuousWithinAt`. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h => (h.union ht).mono <| by simp only [diff_union_self, subset_union_left], fun h =>
h.mono diff_subset⟩
/-- See also `continuousWithinAt_diff_singleton` for the case of `s \ {y}`, but
requiring `T1Space α. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_diff_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ {x}) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_singleton.diff_iff
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_compl_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f {x}ᶜ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, continuousWithinAt_diff_self, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousOn.mono (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (hf x (h hx)).mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono _ h)
theorem antitone_continuousOn {f : α → β} : Antitone (ContinuousOn f) := fun _s _t hst hf =>
hf.mono hst
/-!
### Relation between `ContinuousAt` and `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
theorem ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
ContinuousWithinAt.mono ((continuousWithinAt_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [← univ_inter s, continuousWithinAt_inter h, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt hs).mp h
theorem IsOpen.continuousOn_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ContinuousAt f a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt ∘ hs.mem_nhds
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousAt (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).continuousAt hx
theorem continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (hcont x hx).continuousWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContinuousAt.continuousOn := continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.continuousOn (h : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at h
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
theorem Continuous.continuousWithinAt (h : Continuous f) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-!
### Congruence properties with respect to functions
-/
theorem ContinuousOn.congr_mono (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn g s₁ := by
intro x hx
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at A
rw [← h' hx] at A
exact A.congr' h'.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin.symm
theorem ContinuousOn.congr (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (Subset.refl _)
theorem continuousOn_congr (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
⟨fun h => ContinuousOn.congr h h'.symm, fun h => h.congr h'⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : f x = g x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx, tendsto_congr' h, ContinuousWithinAt]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
(h₁.congr_continuousWithinAt hx).2 h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_mem (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
| ⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h.symm hx,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) h₁)
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 862 | 868 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Measurable
/-! # Measurability of the line derivative
We prove in `measurable_lineDeriv` that the line derivative of a function (with respect to a
locally compact scalar field) is measurable, provided the function is continuous.
In `measurable_lineDeriv_uncurry`, assuming additionally that the source space is second countable,
we show that `(x, v) ↦ lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` is also measurable.
An assumption such as continuity is necessary, as otherwise one could alternate in a non-measurable
way between differentiable and non-differentiable functions along the various lines
directed by `v`.
-/
open MeasureTheory
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [LocallyCompactSpace 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [MeasurableSpace E] [OpensMeasurableSpace E]
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{f : E → F} {v : E}
/-!
Measurability of the line derivative `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` with respect to a fixed direction `v`.
-/
theorem measurableSet_lineDifferentiableAt (hf : Continuous f) :
MeasurableSet {x : E | LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v} := by
borelize 𝕜
let g : E → 𝕜 → F := fun x t ↦ f (x + t • v)
have hg : Continuous g.uncurry := by fun_prop
exact measurable_prodMk_right (measurableSet_of_differentiableAt_with_param 𝕜 hg)
| theorem measurable_lineDeriv [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace F]
(hf : Continuous f) : Measurable (fun x ↦ lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v) := by
borelize 𝕜
let g : E → 𝕜 → F := fun x t ↦ f (x + t • v)
have hg : Continuous g.uncurry := by fun_prop
exact (measurable_deriv_with_param hg).comp measurable_prodMk_right
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LineDeriv/Measurable.lean | 40 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODO
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop
-- The `CompleteLattice, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
-- TODO: this could be replaced with `local infixr:90 " ∘ " => Rel.comp`.
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Rel α β).inv = (⊤ : Rel β α) := by
simp [Top.top, inv, Function.flip_def]
/-- Image of a set under a relation -/
def image (s : Set α) : Set β := { y | ∃ x ∈ s, r x y }
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ image r s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
theorem image_subset : ((· ⊆ ·) ⇒ (· ⊆ ·)) r.image r.image := fun _ _ h _ ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩ =>
⟨x, h xs, rxy⟩
theorem image_mono : Monotone r.image :=
r.image_subset
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.image s ∩ r.image t :=
r.image_mono.map_inf_le s t
theorem image_union (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∪ t) = r.image s ∪ r.image t :=
le_antisymm
(fun _y ⟨x, xst, rxy⟩ =>
xst.elim (fun xs => Or.inl ⟨x, ⟨xs, rxy⟩⟩) fun xt => Or.inr ⟨x, ⟨xt, rxy⟩⟩)
(r.image_mono.le_map_sup s t)
@[simp]
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : image (@Eq α) s = s := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
theorem image_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set α) : image (r • s) t = image s (image r t) := by
ext z; simp only [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩; exact ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩
· rintro ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩; exact ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩
theorem image_univ : r.image Set.univ = r.codom := by
ext y
simp [mem_image, codom]
@[simp]
theorem image_empty : r.image ∅ = ∅ := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem image_bot (s : Set α) : (⊥ : Rel α β).image s = ∅ := by
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x h
simp [mem_image, Bot.bot] at h
@[simp]
theorem image_top {s : Set α} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).image s = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun _ ↦ ⟨h.some, by simp [h.some_mem, Top.top]⟩
/-- Preimage of a set under a relation `r`. Same as the image of `s` under `r.inv` -/
def preimage (s : Set β) : Set α :=
r.inv.image s
theorem mem_preimage (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ r.preimage s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_def (s : Set β) : preimage r s = { x | ∃ y ∈ s, r x y } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_preimage _ _ _
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : r.preimage s ⊆ r.preimage t :=
image_mono _ h
theorem preimage_inter (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.preimage s ∩ r.preimage t :=
image_inter _ s t
theorem preimage_union (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∪ t) = r.preimage s ∪ r.preimage t :=
image_union _ s t
theorem preimage_id (s : Set α) : preimage (@Eq α) s = s := by
simp only [preimage, inv_id, image_id]
theorem preimage_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set γ) :
preimage (r • s) t = preimage r (preimage s t) := by simp only [preimage, inv_comp, image_comp]
theorem preimage_univ : r.preimage Set.univ = r.dom := by rw [preimage, image_univ, codom_inv]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : r.preimage ∅ = ∅ := by rw [preimage, image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inv (s : Set α) : r.inv.preimage s = r.image s := by rw [preimage, inv_inv]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_bot (s : Set β) : (⊥ : Rel α β).preimage s = ∅ := by
rw [preimage, inv_bot, image_bot]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_top {s : Set β} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).preimage s = Set.univ := by rwa [← inv_top, preimage, inv_inv, image_top]
theorem image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset {s : Set β} (h : r.codom ⊆ s) : r.preimage s = r.dom := by
rw [← preimage_univ]
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· exact image_subset _ (Set.subset_univ _)
· intro x hx
simp only [mem_preimage, Set.mem_univ, true_and] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ryx⟩
have hy : y ∈ s := h ⟨x, ryx⟩
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, ryx⟩⟩
theorem preimage_eq_codom_of_domain_subset {s : Set α} (h : r.dom ⊆ s) : r.image s = r.codom := by
apply r.inv.image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset (by rwa [← codom_inv] at h)
theorem image_inter_dom_eq (s : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ r.dom) = r.image s := by
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· apply r.image_mono (by simp)
· intro x h
rw [mem_image] at *
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, ryx⟩
use y
suffices h : y ∈ r.dom by simp_all only [Set.mem_inter_iff, and_self]
rw [dom, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
use x
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inter_codom_eq (s : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ r.codom) = r.preimage s := by
rw [← dom_inv, preimage, preimage, image_inter_dom_eq]
theorem inter_dom_subset_preimage_image (s : Set α) : s ∩ r.dom ⊆ r.preimage (r.image s) := by
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, dom] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx, ⟨y, rxy⟩⟩
use y
simp only [image, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact ⟨⟨x, hx, rxy⟩, rxy⟩
|
theorem image_preimage_subset_inter_codom (s : Set β) : s ∩ r.codom ⊆ r.image (r.preimage s) := by
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 272 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
/-!
# Partial Equivalences
In this file, we define partial equivalences `PEquiv`, which are a bijection between a subset of `α`
and a subset of `β`. Notationally, a `PEquiv` is denoted by "`≃.`" (note that the full stop is part
of the notation). The way we store these internally is with two functions `f : α → Option β` and
the reverse function `g : β → Option α`, with the condition that if `f a` is `some b`,
then `g b` is `some a`.
## Main results
- `PEquiv.ofSet`: creates a `PEquiv` from a set `s`,
which sends an element to itself if it is in `s`.
- `PEquiv.single`: given two elements `a : α` and `b : β`, create a `PEquiv` that sends them to
each other, and ignores all other elements.
- `PEquiv.injective_of_forall_ne_isSome`/`injective_of_forall_isSome`: If the domain of a `PEquiv`
is all of `α` (except possibly one point), its `toFun` is injective.
## Canonical order
`PEquiv` is canonically ordered by inclusion; that is, if a function `f` defined on a subset `s`
is equal to `g` on that subset, but `g` is also defined on a larger set, then `f ≤ g`. We also have
a definition of `⊥`, which is the empty `PEquiv` (sends all to `none`), which in the end gives us a
`SemilatticeInf` with an `OrderBot` instance.
## Tags
pequiv, partial equivalence
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u v w x
/-- A `PEquiv` is a partial equivalence, a representation of a bijection between a subset
of `α` and a subset of `β`. See also `PartialEquiv` for a version that requires `toFun` and
`invFun` to be globally defined functions and has `source` and `target` sets as extra fields. -/
structure PEquiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
/-- The underlying partial function of a `PEquiv` -/
toFun : α → Option β
/-- The partial inverse of `toFun` -/
invFun : β → Option α
/-- `invFun` is the partial inverse of `toFun` -/
inv : ∀ (a : α) (b : β), a ∈ invFun b ↔ b ∈ toFun a
/-- A `PEquiv` is a partial equivalence, a representation of a bijection between a subset
of `α` and a subset of `β`. See also `PartialEquiv` for a version that requires `toFun` and
`invFun` to be globally defined functions and has `source` and `target` sets as extra fields. -/
infixr:25 " ≃. " => PEquiv
namespace PEquiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type x}
open Function Option
instance : FunLike (α ≃. β) α (Option β) :=
{ coe := toFun
coe_injective' := by
rintro ⟨f₁, f₂, hf⟩ ⟨g₁, g₂, hg⟩ (rfl : f₁ = g₁)
congr with y x
simp only [hf, hg] }
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f₁ : α → Option β) (f₂ h) : (mk f₁ f₂ h : α → Option β) = f₁ :=
rfl
theorem coe_mk_apply (f₁ : α → Option β) (f₂ : β → Option α) (h) (x : α) :
(PEquiv.mk f₁ f₂ h : α → Option β) x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : α ≃. β} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- The identity map as a partial equivalence. -/
@[refl]
protected def refl (α : Type*) : α ≃. α where
toFun := some
invFun := some
inv _ _ := eq_comm
/-- The inverse partial equivalence. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (f : α ≃. β) : β ≃. α where
toFun := f.2
invFun := f.1
inv _ _ := (f.inv _ _).symm
theorem mem_iff_mem (f : α ≃. β) : ∀ {a : α} {b : β}, a ∈ f.symm b ↔ b ∈ f a :=
f.3 _ _
theorem eq_some_iff (f : α ≃. β) : ∀ {a : α} {b : β}, f.symm b = some a ↔ f a = some b :=
f.3 _ _
/-- Composition of partial equivalences `f : α ≃. β` and `g : β ≃. γ`. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) :
α ≃. γ where
toFun a := (f a).bind g
invFun a := (g.symm a).bind f.symm
inv a b := by simp_all [and_comm, eq_some_iff f, eq_some_iff g, bind_eq_some_iff]
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (a : α) : PEquiv.refl α a = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_refl : (PEquiv.refl α).symm = PEquiv.refl α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (f : α ≃. β) : f.symm.symm = f := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (PEquiv.symm : (α ≃. β) → β ≃. α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
theorem symm_injective : Function.Injective (@PEquiv.symm α β) :=
symm_bijective.injective
theorem trans_assoc (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (h : γ ≃. δ) :
(f.trans g).trans h = f.trans (g.trans h) :=
ext fun _ => Option.bind_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_trans (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) (c : γ) :
c ∈ f.trans g a ↔ ∃ b, b ∈ f a ∧ c ∈ g b :=
Option.bind_eq_some'
theorem trans_eq_some (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) (c : γ) :
f.trans g a = some c ↔ ∃ b, f a = some b ∧ g b = some c :=
Option.bind_eq_some'
theorem trans_eq_none (f : α ≃. β) (g : β ≃. γ) (a : α) :
f.trans g a = none ↔ ∀ b c, b ∉ f a ∨ c ∉ g b := by
simp only [eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_trans, imp_iff_not_or.symm]
push_neg
exact forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (f : α ≃. β) : (PEquiv.refl α).trans f = f := by
ext; dsimp [PEquiv.trans]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (f : α ≃. β) : f.trans (PEquiv.refl β) = f := by
ext; dsimp [PEquiv.trans]; simp
protected theorem inj (f : α ≃. β) {a₁ a₂ : α} {b : β} (h₁ : b ∈ f a₁) (h₂ : b ∈ f a₂) :
a₁ = a₂ := by rw [← mem_iff_mem] at *; cases h : f.symm b <;> simp_all
/-- If the domain of a `PEquiv` is `α` except a point, its forward direction is injective. -/
theorem injective_of_forall_ne_isSome (f : α ≃. β) (a₂ : α)
(h : ∀ a₁ : α, a₁ ≠ a₂ → isSome (f a₁)) : Injective f :=
HasLeftInverse.injective
⟨fun b => Option.recOn b a₂ fun b' => Option.recOn (f.symm b') a₂ id, fun x => by
classical
cases hfx : f x
· have : x = a₂ := not_imp_comm.1 (h x) (hfx.symm ▸ by simp)
simp [this]
· dsimp only
rw [(eq_some_iff f).2 hfx]
rfl⟩
/-- If the domain of a `PEquiv` is all of `α`, its forward direction is injective. -/
theorem injective_of_forall_isSome {f : α ≃. β} (h : ∀ a : α, isSome (f a)) : Injective f :=
(Classical.em (Nonempty α)).elim
(fun hn => injective_of_forall_ne_isSome f (Classical.choice hn) fun a _ => h a) fun hn x =>
(hn ⟨x⟩).elim
|
section OfSet
| Mathlib/Data/PEquiv.lean | 178 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
section congr
variable {g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.congr (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.congr (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.congr (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.congr (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
end congr
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
theorem ConvexOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem ConcaveOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
|
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 385 | 396 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Control.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
import Mathlib.Util.CompileInductive
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
import Batteries.Logic
/-!
## Definitions on lists
This file contains various definitions on lists. It does not contain
proofs about these definitions, those are contained in other files in `Data.List`
-/
namespace List
open Function Nat
universe u v w x
variable {α β γ δ ε ζ : Type*}
instance [DecidableEq α] : SDiff (List α) :=
⟨List.diff⟩
/-- "Inhabited" `get` function: returns `default` instead of `none` in the case
that the index is out of bounds. -/
def getI [Inhabited α] (l : List α) (n : Nat) : α :=
getD l n default
/-- The head of a list, or the default element of the type is the list is `nil`. -/
def headI [Inhabited α] : List α → α
| [] => default
| (a :: _) => a
@[simp] theorem headI_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).headI = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem headI_cons [Inhabited α] {h : α} {t : List α} : (h :: t).headI = h := rfl
/-- The last element of a list, with the default if list empty -/
def getLastI [Inhabited α] : List α → α
| [] => default
| [a] => a
| [_, b] => b
| _ :: _ :: l => getLastI l
/-- "Inhabited" `take` function: Take `n` elements from a list `l`. If `l` has less than `n`
elements, append `n - length l` elements `default`. -/
def takeI [Inhabited α] (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List α :=
takeD n l default
/-- `findM tac l` returns the first element of `l` on which `tac` succeeds, and
fails otherwise. -/
def findM {α} {m : Type u → Type v} [Alternative m] (tac : α → m PUnit) : List α → m α :=
List.firstM fun a => (tac a) $> a
/-- `findM? p l` returns the first element `a` of `l` for which `p a` returns
true. `findM?` short-circuits, so `p` is not necessarily run on every `a` in
`l`. This is a monadic version of `List.find`. -/
def findM?'
{m : Type u → Type v}
[Monad m] {α : Type u}
(p : α → m (ULift Bool)) : List α → m (Option α)
| [] => pure none
| x :: xs => do
let ⟨px⟩ ← p x
if px then pure (some x) else findM?' p xs
section
variable {m : Type → Type v} [Monad m]
/-- `orM xs` runs the actions in `xs`, returning true if any of them returns
true. `orM` short-circuits, so if an action returns true, later actions are
not run. -/
def orM : List (m Bool) → m Bool :=
anyM id
/-- `andM xs` runs the actions in `xs`, returning true if all of them return
true. `andM` short-circuits, so if an action returns false, later actions are
not run. -/
def andM : List (m Bool) → m Bool :=
allM id
end
section foldIdxM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
/-- Monadic variant of `foldlIdx`. -/
def foldlIdxM {α β} (f : ℕ → β → α → m β) (b : β) (as : List α) : m β :=
as.foldlIdx
(fun i ma b => do
let a ← ma
f i a b)
(pure b)
/-- Monadic variant of `foldrIdx`. -/
def foldrIdxM {α β} (f : ℕ → α → β → m β) (b : β) (as : List α) : m β :=
as.foldrIdx
(fun i a mb => do
let b ← mb
f i a b)
(pure b)
end foldIdxM
section mapIdxM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `mapIdxM'`. -/
def mapIdxMAux' {α} (f : ℕ → α → m PUnit) : ℕ → List α → m PUnit
| _, [] => pure ⟨⟩
| i, a :: as => f i a *> mapIdxMAux' f (i + 1) as
/-- A variant of `mapIdxM` specialised to applicative actions which
return `Unit`. -/
def mapIdxM' {α} (f : ℕ → α → m PUnit) (as : List α) : m PUnit :=
mapIdxMAux' f 0 as
end mapIdxM
/-- `l.Forall p` is equivalent to `∀ a ∈ l, p a`, but unfolds directly to a conjunction, i.e.
`List.Forall p [0, 1, 2] = p 0 ∧ p 1 ∧ p 2`. -/
@[simp]
def Forall (p : α → Prop) : List α → Prop
| [] => True
| x :: [] => p x
| x :: l => p x ∧ Forall p l
section Permutations
/-- An auxiliary function for defining `permutations`. `permutationsAux2 t ts r ys f` is equal to
`(ys ++ ts, (insert_left ys t ts).map f ++ r)`, where `insert_left ys t ts` (not explicitly
defined) is the list of lists of the form `insert_nth n t (ys ++ ts)` for `0 ≤ n < length ys`.
permutations_aux2 10 [4, 5, 6] [] [1, 2, 3] id =
([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
[[10, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
[1, 10, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6],
[1, 2, 10, 3, 4, 5, 6]]) -/
def permutationsAux2 (t : α) (ts : List α) (r : List β) : List α → (List α → β) → List α × List β
| [], _ => (ts, r)
| y :: ys, f =>
let (us, zs) := permutationsAux2 t ts r ys (fun x : List α => f (y :: x))
(y :: us, f (t :: y :: us) :: zs)
/-- A recursor for pairs of lists. To have `C l₁ l₂` for all `l₁`, `l₂`, it suffices to have it for
`l₂ = []` and to be able to pour the elements of `l₁` into `l₂`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def permutationsAux.rec {C : List α → List α → Sort v} (H0 : ∀ is, C [] is)
(H1 : ∀ t ts is, C ts (t :: is) → C is [] → C (t :: ts) is) : ∀ l₁ l₂, C l₁ l₂
| [], is => H0 is
| t :: ts, is =>
H1 t ts is (permutationsAux.rec H0 H1 ts (t :: is)) (permutationsAux.rec H0 H1 is [])
termination_by ts is => (length ts + length is, length ts)
decreasing_by all_goals (simp_wf; omega)
/-- An auxiliary function for defining `permutations`. `permutationsAux ts is` is the set of all
permutations of `is ++ ts` that do not fix `ts`. -/
def permutationsAux : List α → List α → List (List α) :=
permutationsAux.rec (fun _ => []) fun t ts is IH1 IH2 =>
foldr (fun y r => (permutationsAux2 t ts r y id).2) IH1 (is :: IH2)
/-- List of all permutations of `l`.
permutations [1, 2, 3] =
[[1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3], [3, 2, 1],
[2, 3, 1], [3, 1, 2], [1, 3, 2]] -/
def permutations (l : List α) : List (List α) :=
l :: permutationsAux l []
/-- `permutations'Aux t ts` inserts `t` into every position in `ts`, including the last.
This function is intended for use in specifications, so it is simpler than `permutationsAux2`,
which plays roughly the same role in `permutations`.
Note that `(permutationsAux2 t [] [] ts id).2` is similar to this function, but skips the last
position:
permutations'Aux 10 [1, 2, 3] =
[[10, 1, 2, 3], [1, 10, 2, 3], [1, 2, 10, 3], [1, 2, 3, 10]]
(permutationsAux2 10 [] [] [1, 2, 3] id).2 =
[[10, 1, 2, 3], [1, 10, 2, 3], [1, 2, 10, 3]] -/
@[simp]
def permutations'Aux (t : α) : List α → List (List α)
| [] => [[t]]
| y :: ys => (t :: y :: ys) :: (permutations'Aux t ys).map (cons y)
/-- List of all permutations of `l`. This version of `permutations` is less efficient but has
simpler definitional equations. The permutations are in a different order,
but are equal up to permutation, as shown by `List.permutations_perm_permutations'`.
permutations [1, 2, 3] =
[[1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3], [2, 3, 1],
[1, 3, 2], [3, 1, 2], [3, 2, 1]] -/
@[simp]
def permutations' : List α → List (List α)
| [] => [[]]
| t :: ts => (permutations' ts).flatMap <| permutations'Aux t
end Permutations
/-- `extractp p l` returns a pair of an element `a` of `l` satisfying the predicate
`p`, and `l`, with `a` removed. If there is no such element `a` it returns `(none, l)`. -/
def extractp (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : List α → Option α × List α
| [] => (none, [])
| a :: l =>
if p a then (some a, l)
else
let (a', l') := extractp p l
(a', a :: l')
/-- Notation for calculating the product of a `List`
-/
instance instSProd : SProd (List α) (List β) (List (α × β)) where
sprod := List.product
section Chain
instance decidableChain {R : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel R] (a : α) (l : List α) :
Decidable (Chain R a l) := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => exact decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (p := True) (by simp)
| cons b as ih =>
haveI := ih; exact decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (p := (R a b ∧ Chain R b as)) (by simp)
instance decidableChain' {R : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel R] (l : List α) :
Decidable (Chain' R l) := by
cases l
· exact inferInstanceAs (Decidable True)
· exact inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Chain _ _ _))
end Chain
/-- `dedup l` removes duplicates from `l` (taking only the last occurrence).
Defined as `pwFilter (≠)`.
dedup [1, 0, 2, 2, 1] = [0, 2, 1] -/
def dedup [DecidableEq α] : List α → List α :=
pwFilter (· ≠ ·)
/-- Greedily create a sublist of `a :: l` such that, for every two adjacent elements `a, b`,
`R a b` holds. Mostly used with ≠; for example, `destutter' (≠) 1 [2, 2, 1, 1] = [1, 2, 1]`,
`destutter' (≠) 1, [2, 3, 3] = [1, 2, 3]`, `destutter' (<) 1 [2, 5, 2, 3, 4, 9] = [1, 2, 5, 9]`. -/
def destutter' (R : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel R] : α → List α → List α
| a, [] => [a]
| a, h :: l => if R a h then a :: destutter' R h l else destutter' R a l
-- TODO: should below be "lazily"?
/-- Greedily create a sublist of `l` such that, for every two adjacent elements `a, b ∈ l`,
`R a b` holds. Mostly used with ≠; for example, `destutter (≠) [1, 2, 2, 1, 1] = [1, 2, 1]`,
`destutter (≠) [1, 2, 3, 3] = [1, 2, 3]`, `destutter (<) [1, 2, 5, 2, 3, 4, 9] = [1, 2, 5, 9]`. -/
def destutter (R : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel R] : List α → List α
| h :: l => destutter' R h l
| [] => []
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
/-- Given a decidable predicate `p` and a proof of existence of `a ∈ l` such that `p a`,
choose the first element with this property. This version returns both `a` and proofs
of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ l : List α, ∀ _ : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a }
| [], hp => False.elim (Exists.elim hp fun _ h => not_mem_nil h.left)
| l :: ls, hp =>
if pl : p l then ⟨l, ⟨mem_cons.mpr <| Or.inl rfl, pl⟩⟩
else
-- pattern matching on `hx` too makes this not reducible!
let ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
chooseX ls
(hp.imp fun _ ⟨o, h₂⟩ => ⟨(mem_cons.mp o).resolve_left fun e => pl <| e ▸ h₂, h₂⟩)
⟨a, mem_cons.mpr <| Or.inr ha.1, ha.2⟩
/-- Given a decidable predicate `p` and a proof of existence of `a ∈ l` such that `p a`,
choose the first element with this property. This version returns `a : α`, and properties
are given by `choose_mem` and `choose_property`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
end Choose
/-- `mapDiagM' f l` calls `f` on all elements in the upper triangular part of `l × l`.
That is, for each `e ∈ l`, it will run `f e e` and then `f e e'`
for each `e'` that appears after `e` in `l`.
Example: suppose `l = [1, 2, 3]`. `mapDiagM' f l` will evaluate, in this order,
`f 1 1`, `f 1 2`, `f 1 3`, `f 2 2`, `f 2 3`, `f 3 3`.
-/
def mapDiagM' {m} [Monad m] {α} (f : α → α → m Unit) : List α → m Unit
| [] => return ()
| h :: t => do
_ ← f h h
_ ← t.mapM' (f h)
t.mapDiagM' f
-- as ported:
-- | [] => return ()
-- | h :: t => (f h h >> t.mapM' (f h)) >> t.mapDiagM'
/-- Left-biased version of `List.map₂`. `map₂Left' f as bs` applies `f` to each
pair of elements `aᵢ ∈ as` and `bᵢ ∈ bs`. If `bs` is shorter than `as`, `f` is
applied to `none` for the remaining `aᵢ`. Returns the results of the `f`
applications and the remaining `bs`.
```
map₂Left' prod.mk [1, 2] ['a'] = ([(1, some 'a'), (2, none)], [])
map₂Left' prod.mk [1] ['a', 'b'] = ([(1, some 'a')], ['b'])
```
-/
@[simp]
def map₂Left' (f : α → Option β → γ) : List α → List β → List γ × List β
| [], bs => ([], bs)
| a :: as, [] => ((a :: as).map fun a => f a none, [])
| a :: as, b :: bs =>
let rec' := map₂Left' f as bs
(f a (some b) :: rec'.fst, rec'.snd)
/-- Right-biased version of `List.map₂`. `map₂Right' f as bs` applies `f` to each
pair of elements `aᵢ ∈ as` and `bᵢ ∈ bs`. If `as` is shorter than `bs`, `f` is
applied to `none` for the remaining `bᵢ`. Returns the results of the `f`
applications and the remaining `as`.
```
map₂Right' prod.mk [1] ['a', 'b'] = ([(some 1, 'a'), (none, 'b')], [])
map₂Right' prod.mk [1, 2] ['a'] = ([(some 1, 'a')], [2])
```
-/
def map₂Right' (f : Option α → β → γ) (as : List α) (bs : List β) : List γ × List α :=
map₂Left' (flip f) bs as
/-- Left-biased version of `List.map₂`. `map₂Left f as bs` applies `f` to each pair
`aᵢ ∈ as` and `bᵢ ∈ bs`. If `bs` is shorter than `as`, `f` is applied to `none`
for the remaining `aᵢ`.
```
map₂Left Prod.mk [1, 2] ['a'] = [(1, some 'a'), (2, none)]
map₂Left Prod.mk [1] ['a', 'b'] = [(1, some 'a')]
map₂Left f as bs = (map₂Left' f as bs).fst
```
-/
@[simp]
def map₂Left (f : α → Option β → γ) : List α → List β → List γ
| [], _ => []
| a :: as, [] => (a :: as).map fun a => f a none
| a :: as, b :: bs => f a (some b) :: map₂Left f as bs
/-- Right-biased version of `List.map₂`. `map₂Right f as bs` applies `f` to each
pair `aᵢ ∈ as` and `bᵢ ∈ bs`. If `as` is shorter than `bs`, `f` is applied to
`none` for the remaining `bᵢ`.
```
map₂Right Prod.mk [1, 2] ['a'] = [(some 1, 'a')]
map₂Right Prod.mk [1] ['a', 'b'] = [(some 1, 'a'), (none, 'b')]
map₂Right f as bs = (map₂Right' f as bs).fst
```
-/
def map₂Right (f : Option α → β → γ) (as : List α) (bs : List β) : List γ :=
map₂Left (flip f) bs as
-- TODO: naming is awkward...
/-- Asynchronous version of `List.map`.
-/
def mapAsyncChunked {α β} (f : α → β) (xs : List α) (chunk_size := 1024) : List β :=
((xs.toChunks chunk_size).map fun xs => Task.spawn fun _ => List.map f xs).flatMap Task.get
/-!
We add some n-ary versions of `List.zipWith` for functions with more than two arguments.
These can also be written in terms of `List.zip` or `List.zipWith`.
For example, `zipWith3 f xs ys zs` could also be written as
`zipWith id (zipWith f xs ys) zs`
or as
`(zip xs <| zip ys zs).map <| fun ⟨x, y, z⟩ ↦ f x y z`.
-/
/-- Ternary version of `List.zipWith`. -/
def zipWith3 (f : α → β → γ → δ) : List α → List β → List γ → List δ
| x :: xs, y :: ys, z :: zs => f x y z :: zipWith3 f xs ys zs
| _, _, _ => []
/-- Quaternary version of `list.zipWith`. -/
def zipWith4 (f : α → β → γ → δ → ε) : List α → List β → List γ → List δ → List ε
| x :: xs, y :: ys, z :: zs, u :: us => f x y z u :: zipWith4 f xs ys zs us
| _, _, _, _ => []
/-- Quinary version of `list.zipWith`. -/
def zipWith5 (f : α → β → γ → δ → ε → ζ) : List α → List β → List γ → List δ → List ε → List ζ
| x :: xs, y :: ys, z :: zs, u :: us, v :: vs => f x y z u v :: zipWith5 f xs ys zs us vs
| _, _, _, _, _ => []
/-- Given a starting list `old`, a list of booleans and a replacement list `new`,
read the items in `old` in succession and either replace them with the next element of `new` or
not, according as to whether the corresponding boolean is `true` or `false`. -/
def replaceIf : List α → List Bool → List α → List α
| l, _, [] => l
| [], _, _ => []
| l, [], _ => l
| n :: ns, tf :: bs, e@(c :: cs) => if tf then c :: ns.replaceIf bs cs else n :: ns.replaceIf bs e
/-- `iterate f a n` is `[a, f a, ..., f^[n - 1] a]`. -/
@[simp]
def iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : (n : ℕ) → List α
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => a :: iterate f (f a) n
/-- Tail-recursive version of `List.iterate`. -/
@[inline]
def iterateTR (f : α → α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
loop a n []
where
/-- `iterateTR.loop f a n l := iterate f a n ++ reverse l`. -/
@[simp, specialize]
loop (a : α) (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : List α :=
match n with
| 0 => reverse l
| n + 1 => loop (f a) n (a :: l)
theorem iterateTR_loop_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
iterateTR.loop f a n l = reverse l ++ iterate f a n := by
induction n generalizing a l <;> simp [*]
@[csimp]
theorem iterate_eq_iterateTR : @iterate = @iterateTR := by
funext α f a n
exact Eq.symm <| iterateTR_loop_eq f a n []
section MapAccumr
/-- Runs a function over a list returning the intermediate results and a final result. -/
def mapAccumr (f : α → γ → γ × β) : List α → γ → γ × List β
| [], c => (c, [])
| y :: yr, c =>
let r := mapAccumr f yr c
let z := f y r.1
(z.1, z.2 :: r.2)
/-- Length of the list obtained by `mapAccumr`. -/
@[simp]
theorem length_mapAccumr :
∀ (f : α → γ → γ × β) (x : List α) (s : γ), length (mapAccumr f x s).2 = length x
| f, _ :: x, s => congr_arg succ (length_mapAccumr f x s)
| _, [], _ => rfl
/-- Runs a function over two lists returning the intermediate results and a final result. -/
def mapAccumr₂ (f : α → β → γ → γ × δ) : List α → List β → γ → γ × List δ
| [], _, c => (c, [])
| _, [], c => (c, [])
| x :: xr, y :: yr, c =>
let r := mapAccumr₂ f xr yr c
let q := f x y r.1
(q.1, q.2 :: r.2)
/-- Length of a list obtained using `mapAccumr₂`. -/
@[simp]
theorem length_mapAccumr₂ :
∀ (f : α → β → γ → γ × δ) (x y c), length (mapAccumr₂ f x y c).2 = min (length x) (length y)
| f, _ :: x, _ :: y, c =>
calc
succ (length (mapAccumr₂ f x y c).2) = succ (min (length x) (length y)) :=
congr_arg succ (length_mapAccumr₂ f x y c)
_ = min (succ (length x)) (succ (length y)) := Eq.symm (succ_min_succ (length x) (length y))
| _, _ :: _, [], _ => rfl
| _, [], _ :: _, _ => rfl
| _, [], [], _ => rfl
end MapAccumr
alias ⟨eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, _⟩ := mem_cons
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Defs.lean | 574 | 576 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pointwise
/-!
# The Minkowski functional, normed field version
In this file we define `(egauge 𝕜 s ·)`
to be the Minkowski functional (gauge) of the set `s`
in a topological vector space `E` over a normed field `𝕜`,
as a function `E → ℝ≥0∞`.
It is defined as the infimum of the norms of `c : 𝕜` such that `x ∈ c • s`.
In particular, for `𝕜 = ℝ≥0` this definition gives an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued version of `gauge`
defined in `Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean`.
This definition can be used to generalize the notion of Fréchet derivative
to maps between topological vector spaces without norms.
Currently, we can't reuse results about `egauge` for `gauge`,
because we lack a theory of normed semifields.
-/
open Function Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology Pointwise ENNReal NNReal
section SMul
/-- The Minkowski functional for vector spaces over normed fields.
Given a set `s` in a vector space over a normed field `𝕜`,
`egauge s` is the functional which sends `x : E`
to the infimum of `‖c‖ₑ` over `c` such that `x` belongs to `s` scaled by `c`.
The definition only requires `𝕜` to have a `ENorm` instance
and `(· • ·) : 𝕜 → E → E` to be defined.
This way the definition applies, e.g., to `𝕜 = ℝ≥0`.
For `𝕜 = ℝ≥0`, the function is equal (up to conversion to `ℝ`)
to the usual Minkowski functional defined in `gauge`. -/
noncomputable def egauge (𝕜 : Type*) [ENorm 𝕜] {E : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E] (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (c : 𝕜) (_ : x ∈ c • s), ‖c‖ₑ
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NNNorm 𝕜] {E : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E] {c : 𝕜} {s t : Set E} {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
lemma Set.MapsTo.egauge_le {E' F : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 E'] [FunLike F E E'] [MulActionHomClass F 𝕜 E E']
(f : F) {t : Set E'} (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 t (f x) ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x :=
iInf_mono fun c ↦ iInf_mono' fun hc ↦ ⟨h.smul_set c hc, le_rfl⟩
@[mono, gcongr]
lemma egauge_anti (h : s ⊆ t) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 t x ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x :=
MapsTo.egauge_le _ (MulActionHom.id ..) h _
@[simp] lemma egauge_empty (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 ∅ x = ∞ := by simp [egauge]
variable {𝕜}
lemma egauge_le_of_mem_smul (h : x ∈ c • s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ ‖c‖ₑ := iInf₂_le c h
lemma le_egauge_iff : r ≤ egauge 𝕜 s x ↔ ∀ c : 𝕜, x ∈ c • s → r ≤ ‖c‖ₑ := le_iInf₂_iff
lemma egauge_eq_top : egauge 𝕜 s x = ∞ ↔ ∀ c : 𝕜, x ∉ c • s := by simp [egauge]
lemma egauge_lt_iff : egauge 𝕜 s x < r ↔ ∃ c : 𝕜, x ∈ c • s ∧ ‖c‖ₑ < r := by
simp [egauge, iInf_lt_iff]
lemma egauge_union (s t : Set E) (x : E) : egauge 𝕜 (s ∪ t) x = egauge 𝕜 s x ⊓ egauge 𝕜 t x := by
unfold egauge
simp [smul_set_union, iInf_or, iInf_inf_eq]
lemma le_egauge_inter (s t : Set E) (x : E) :
egauge 𝕜 s x ⊔ egauge 𝕜 t x ≤ egauge 𝕜 (s ∩ t) x :=
max_le (egauge_anti _ inter_subset_left _) (egauge_anti _ inter_subset_right _)
lemma le_egauge_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)] {I : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ I) (s : ∀ i, Set (E i)) (x : ∀ i, E i) :
egauge 𝕜 (s i) (x i) ≤ egauge 𝕜 (I.pi s) x :=
MapsTo.egauge_le _ (Pi.evalMulActionHom i) (fun x hx ↦ by exact hx i hi) _
variable {F : Type*} [SMul 𝕜 F]
lemma le_egauge_prod (s : Set E) (t : Set F) (a : E) (b : F) :
max (egauge 𝕜 s a) (egauge 𝕜 t b) ≤ egauge 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) (a, b) :=
max_le (mapsTo_fst_prod.egauge_le 𝕜 (MulActionHom.fst 𝕜 E F) (a, b))
(MapsTo.egauge_le 𝕜 (MulActionHom.snd 𝕜 E F) mapsTo_snd_prod (a, b))
end SMul
section SMulZero
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NNNorm 𝕜] [Nonempty 𝕜] {E : Type*} [Zero E] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E] {x : E}
@[simp] lemma egauge_zero_left_eq_top : egauge 𝕜 0 x = ∞ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simp [egauge_eq_top]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, egauge_zero_left⟩ := egauge_zero_left_eq_top
end SMulZero
section NormedDivisionRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
{c : 𝕜} {s : Set E} {x : E}
/-- If `c • x ∈ s` and `c ≠ 0`, then `egauge 𝕜 s x` is at most `(‖c‖₊⁻¹ : ℝ≥0)`.
See also `egauge_le_of_smul_mem`. -/
lemma egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne (h : c • x ∈ s) (hc : c ≠ 0) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ (‖c‖₊⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) := by
rw [← nnnorm_inv]
exact egauge_le_of_mem_smul <| (mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ hc _ _).2 h
/-- If `c • x ∈ s`, then `egauge 𝕜 s x` is at most `‖c‖ₑ⁻¹`.
See also `egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne`. -/
lemma egauge_le_of_smul_mem (h : c • x ∈ s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ ‖c‖ₑ⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with rfl | hc
· simp
· exact (egauge_le_of_smul_mem_of_ne h hc).trans ENNReal.coe_inv_le
lemma mem_smul_of_egauge_lt (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (hc : egauge 𝕜 s x < ‖c‖ₑ) : x ∈ c • s :=
let ⟨a, hxa, ha⟩ := egauge_lt_iff.1 hc
hs.smul_mono (by simpa [enorm] using ha.le) hxa
lemma mem_of_egauge_lt_one (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (hx : egauge 𝕜 s x < 1) : x ∈ s :=
one_smul 𝕜 s ▸ mem_smul_of_egauge_lt hs (by simpa)
lemma egauge_eq_zero_iff : egauge 𝕜 s x = 0 ↔ ∃ᶠ c : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x ∈ c • s := by
refine (iInf₂_eq_bot _).trans ?_
rw [(nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_edist).frequently_iff]
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
lemma egauge_univ [(𝓝[≠] (0 : 𝕜)).NeBot] : egauge 𝕜 univ x = 0 := by
rw [egauge_eq_zero_iff]
refine (frequently_iff_neBot.2 ‹_›).mono fun c hc ↦ ?_
simp_all [smul_set_univ₀]
variable (𝕜)
@[simp]
lemma egauge_zero_right (hs : s.Nonempty) : egauge 𝕜 s 0 = 0 := by
have : 0 ∈ (0 : 𝕜) • s := by simp [zero_smul_set hs]
simpa using egauge_le_of_mem_smul this
lemma egauge_zero_zero : egauge 𝕜 (0 : Set E) 0 = 0 := by simp
lemma egauge_le_one (h : x ∈ s) : egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_smul 𝕜 s] at h
simpa using egauge_le_of_mem_smul h
variable {𝕜}
lemma le_egauge_smul_left (c : 𝕜) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
egauge 𝕜 s x / ‖c‖ₑ ≤ egauge 𝕜 (c • s) x := by
simp_rw [le_egauge_iff, smul_smul]
rintro a ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
apply ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
rw [← enorm_mul]
exact egauge_le_of_mem_smul <| smul_mem_smul_set hx
lemma egauge_smul_left (hc : c ≠ 0) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
egauge 𝕜 (c • s) x = egauge 𝕜 s x / ‖c‖ₑ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_egauge_smul_left _ _ _)
rw [ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (by simp [*]) (by simp)]
calc
egauge 𝕜 (c • s) x * ‖c‖ₑ = egauge 𝕜 (c • s) x / ‖c⁻¹‖ₑ := by
rw [enorm_inv (by simpa), div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
_ ≤ egauge 𝕜 (c⁻¹ • c • s) x := le_egauge_smul_left _ _ _
_ = egauge 𝕜 s x := by rw [inv_smul_smul₀ hc]
lemma le_egauge_smul_right (c : 𝕜) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
‖c‖ₑ * egauge 𝕜 s x ≤ egauge 𝕜 s (c • x) := by
rw [le_egauge_iff]
rintro a ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with rfl | hc
· simp
| · refine ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div' <| le_trans ?_ ENNReal.coe_div_le
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← nnnorm_inv, ← nnnorm_mul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/EGauge.lean | 179 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.DirichletCharacter.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Convolution
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Deriv
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.RiemannZeta
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.SumPrimeReciprocals
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.VonMangoldt
/-!
# L-series of Dirichlet characters and arithmetic functions
We collect some results on L-series of specific (arithmetic) functions, for example,
the Möbius function `μ` or the von Mangoldt function `Λ`. In particular, we show that
`L ↗Λ` is the negative of the logarithmic derivative of the Riemann zeta function
on `re s > 1`; see `LSeries_vonMangoldt_eq_deriv_riemannZeta_div`.
We also prove some general results on L-series associated to Dirichlet characters
(i.e., Dirichlet L-series). For example, we show that the abscissa of absolute convergence
equals `1` (see `DirichletCharacter.absicssaOfAbsConv`) and that the L-series does not
vanish on the open half-plane `re s > 1` (see `DirichletCharacter.LSeries_ne_zero_of_one_lt_re`).
We deduce results on the Riemann zeta function (which is `L 1` or `L ↗ζ` on `re s > 1`)
as special cases.
## Tags
Dirichlet L-series, Möbius function, von Mangoldt function, Riemann zeta function
-/
open scoped LSeries.notation
/-- `δ` is the function underlying the arithmetic function `1`. -/
lemma ArithmeticFunction.one_eq_delta : ↗(1 : ArithmeticFunction ℂ) = δ := by
ext
simp [one_apply, LSeries.delta]
section Moebius
/-!
### The L-series of the Möbius function
We show that `L μ s` converges absolutely if and only if `re s > 1`.
-/
namespace ArithmeticFunction
open LSeries Nat Complex
| lemma not_LSeriesSummable_moebius_at_one : ¬ LSeriesSummable ↗μ 1 := by
refine fun h ↦ not_summable_one_div_on_primes <| summable_ofReal.mp <| .of_neg ?_
refine (h.indicator {n | n.Prime}).congr fun n ↦ ?_
by_cases hn : n.Prime
· simp [hn, hn.ne_zero, moebius_apply_prime hn, push_cast, neg_div]
· simp [hn]
/-- The L-series of the Möbius function converges absolutely at `s` if and only if `re s > 1`. -/
lemma LSeriesSummable_moebius_iff {s : ℂ} : LSeriesSummable ↗μ s ↔ 1 < s.re := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/Dirichlet.lean | 54 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.MeanInequalities
/-!
# Triangle inequality for `Lp`-seminorm
In this file we prove several versions of the triangle inequality for the `Lp` seminorm,
as well as simple corollaries.
-/
open Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → E}
theorem eLpNorm'_add_le (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hq1 : 1 ≤ q) : eLpNorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, (‖(f + g) a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) ≤
(∫⁻ a, ((fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) + fun a => (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
gcongr with a
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_add_le]
_ ≤ eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ := ENNReal.lintegral_Lp_add_le hf.enorm hg.enorm hq1
theorem eLpNorm'_add_le_of_le_one (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hq0 : 0 ≤ q) (hq1 : q ≤ 1) :
eLpNorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / q - 1) * (eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ) :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, (‖(f + g) a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) ≤
(∫⁻ a, ((fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) + fun a => (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
gcongr with a
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_add_le]
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / q - 1) * (eLpNorm' f q μ + eLpNorm' g q μ) :=
ENNReal.lintegral_Lp_add_le_of_le_one hf.enorm hq0 hq1
theorem eLpNormEssSup_add_le {f g : α → E} :
eLpNormEssSup (f + g) μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup f μ + eLpNormEssSup g μ := by
refine le_trans (essSup_mono_ae (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)) (ENNReal.essSup_add_le _ _)
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, enorm_eq_nnnorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact nnnorm_add_le _ _
theorem eLpNorm_add_le {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hp1 : 1 ≤ p) : eLpNorm (f + g) p μ ≤ eLpNorm f p μ + eLpNorm g p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, eLpNormEssSup_add_le]
have hp1_real : 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_one, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ENNReal.one_ne_top hp_top]
repeat rw [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp0 hp_top]
exact eLpNorm'_add_le hf hg hp1_real
/-- A constant for the inequality `‖f + g‖_{L^p} ≤ C * (‖f‖_{L^p} + ‖g‖_{L^p})`. It is equal to `1`
for `p ≥ 1` or `p = 0`, and `2^(1/p-1)` in the more tricky interval `(0, 1)`. -/
noncomputable def LpAddConst (p : ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ≥0∞) 1 then (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p.toReal - 1) else 1
theorem LpAddConst_of_one_le {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LpAddConst p = 1 := by
rw [LpAddConst, if_neg]
intro h
exact lt_irrefl _ (h.2.trans_le hp)
theorem LpAddConst_zero : LpAddConst 0 = 1 := by
rw [LpAddConst, if_neg]
intro h
exact lt_irrefl _ h.1
theorem LpAddConst_lt_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) : LpAddConst p < ∞ := by
rw [LpAddConst]
split_ifs with h
· apply ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg _ ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top
rw [one_div, sub_nonneg, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv, ← ENNReal.toReal_one]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (by simpa using h.1.ne') (ENNReal.one_le_inv.2 h.2.le)
· exact ENNReal.one_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_add_le' (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(p : ℝ≥0∞) : eLpNorm (f + g) p μ ≤ LpAddConst p * (eLpNorm f p μ + eLpNorm g p μ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [eLpNorm_exponent_zero, add_zero, mul_zero, le_zero_iff]
rcases lt_or_le p 1 with (h'p | h'p)
· simp only [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp (h'p.trans ENNReal.one_lt_top).ne]
convert eLpNorm'_add_le_of_le_one hf ENNReal.toReal_nonneg _
· have : p ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ≥0∞) 1 := ⟨hp.bot_lt, h'p⟩
simp only [LpAddConst, if_pos this]
· simpa using ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.one_ne_top h'p.le
· simpa [LpAddConst_of_one_le h'p] using eLpNorm_add_le hf hg h'p
variable (μ E)
/-- Technical lemma to control the addition of functions in `L^p` even for `p < 1`: Given `δ > 0`,
| there exists `η` such that two functions bounded by `η` in `L^p` have a sum bounded by `δ`. One
could take `η = δ / 2` for `p ≥ 1`, but the point of the lemma is that it works also for `p < 1`.
-/
theorem exists_Lp_half (p : ℝ≥0∞) {δ : ℝ≥0∞} (hδ : δ ≠ 0) :
∃ η : ℝ≥0∞,
0 < η ∧
∀ (f g : α → E), AEStronglyMeasurable f μ → AEStronglyMeasurable g μ →
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ η → eLpNorm g p μ ≤ η → eLpNorm (f + g) p μ < δ := by
have :
Tendsto (fun η : ℝ≥0∞ => LpAddConst p * (η + η)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (LpAddConst p * (0 + 0))) :=
(ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_id.add tendsto_id)
(Or.inr (LpAddConst_lt_top p).ne)).mono_left
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/TriangleInequality.lean | 98 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Indicator function
- `Set.indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `0` otherwise.
- `Set.mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `1` otherwise.
## Implementation note
In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function is a function
used to indicate membership of an element in a set `s`,
having the value `1` for all elements of `s` and the value `0` otherwise.
But since it is usually used to restrict a function to a certain set `s`,
we let the indicator function take the value `f x` for some function `f`, instead of `1`.
If the usual indicator function is needed, just set `f` to be the constant function `fun _ ↦ 1`.
The indicator function is implemented non-computably, to avoid having to pass around `Decidable`
arguments. This is in contrast with the design of `Pi.single` or `Set.piecewise`.
## Tags
indicator, characteristic
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
/-- `Set.mulIndicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `1` otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun _ => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
/-- If a multiplicative indicator function is not equal to `1` at a point, then that point is in the
set. -/
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`"]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) f s := fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_mem hx f
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator` for the version with `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator` for the version with `s`."]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator' : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) 1 sᶜ :=
fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hx f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ s := fun _ hx =>
hx.imp_symm fun h => mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_mulSupport : mulIndicator (mulSupport f) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 Subset.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) (g : α → M) :
mulIndicator (range f) g ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ range f)
piecewise_range_comp _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_congr (h : EqOn f g s) : mulIndicator s f = mulIndicator s g :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with h_1
· exact h h_1
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator {t : Set β} {g : β → M} {b : β}
(h1 : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) (h2 : f a = g b) :
s.mulIndicator f a = t.mulIndicator g b := by
by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp_all
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_eq_mulIndicator_const {t : Set β} {b : β} {c : M} (h : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) :
s.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) a = t.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) b :=
mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator h rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_univ (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (univ : Set α) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 <| subset_univ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_empty (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = fun _ => 1 :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| disjoint_empty _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_empty' (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = 1 :=
mulIndicator_empty f
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one (s : Set α) : (mulIndicator s fun _ => (1 : M)) = fun _ => (1 : M) :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| by simp only [mulSupport_one, empty_disjoint]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one' {s : Set α} : s.mulIndicator (1 : α → M) = 1 :=
mulIndicator_one M s
variable {M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (mulIndicator t f) = mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp_all +contextual
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∩ mulSupport f) f = mulIndicator s f := by
rw [← mulIndicator_mulIndicator, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator (h : M → β) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {x : α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
h (s.mulIndicator f x) = s.piecewise (h ∘ f) (const α (h 1)) x := by
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
convert s.apply_piecewise f (const α 1) (fun _ => h) (x := x) using 2
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_right {s : Set α} (f : β → α) {g : α → M} {x : β} :
mulIndicator (f ⁻¹' s) (g ∘ f) x = mulIndicator s g (f x) := by
simp only [mulIndicator, Function.comp]
split_ifs with h h' h'' <;> first | rfl | contradiction
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_image {s : Set α} {f : β → M} {g : α → β} (hg : Injective g) {x : α} :
mulIndicator (g '' s) f (g x) = mulIndicator s (f ∘ g) x := by
rw [← mulIndicator_comp_right, preimage_image_eq _ hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_of_one {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) :
mulIndicator s (g ∘ f) = g ∘ mulIndicator s f := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator_const (c : M) (f : M → N) (hf : f 1 = 1) :
(fun x => f (s.mulIndicator (fun _ => c) x)) = s.mulIndicator fun _ => f c :=
(mulIndicator_comp_of_one hf).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (B : Set M) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' B = s.ite (f ⁻¹' B) (1 ⁻¹' B) :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
piecewise_preimage s f 1 B
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_one_preimage (s : Set M) :
t.mulIndicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_one', preimage_one]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) [Decidable (a ∈ s)]
[Decidable ((1 : M) ∈ s)] : (U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s =
(if a ∈ s then U else ∅) ∪ if (1 : M) ∈ s then Uᶜ else ∅ := by
rw [mulIndicator_preimage, preimage_one, preimage_const]
split_ifs <;> simp [← compl_eq_univ_diff]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) :
(U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem indicator_one_preimage [Zero M] (U : Set α) (s : Set M) :
U.indicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) :=
indicator_const_preimage _ _ 1
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage_of_not_mem (s : Set α) (f : α → M) {t : Set M} (ht : (1 : M) ∉ t) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' t = f ⁻¹' t ∩ s := by
simp [mulIndicator_preimage, Pi.one_def, Set.preimage_const_of_not_mem ht]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_range_mulIndicator {r : M} {s : Set α} {f : α → M} :
r ∈ range (mulIndicator s f) ↔ r = 1 ∧ s ≠ univ ∨ r ∈ f '' s := by
simp [mulIndicator, ite_eq_iff, exists_or, eq_univ_iff_forall, and_comm, or_comm,
@eq_comm _ r 1]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_rel_mulIndicator {r : M → M → Prop} (h1 : r 1 1) (ha : a ∈ s → r (f a) (g a)) :
r (mulIndicator s f a) (mulIndicator s g a) := by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with has
exacts [ha has, h1]
end One
section Monoid
variable [MulOneClass M] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply (f : α → M) (s t : Set α) (a : α) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f a * mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f a
= mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a := by
by_cases hs : a ∈ s <;> by_cases ht : a ∈ t <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_mul_inter (f : α → M) (s t : Set α) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f * mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f = mulIndicator s f * mulIndicator t f :=
funext <| mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply f s t
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter (h : a ∉ s ∩ t) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f a = mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a := by
rw [← mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply f s t, mulIndicator_of_not_mem h, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint (h : Disjoint s t) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f = fun a => mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a :=
funext fun _ => mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter (fun ha => h.le_bot ha) _
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_symmDiff (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∆ t) f = mulIndicator (s \ t) f * mulIndicator (t \ s) f :=
mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le) _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul (s : Set α) (f g : α → M) :
(mulIndicator s fun a => f a * g a) = fun a => mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator s g a := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs
· rfl
rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul' (s : Set α) (f g : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (f * g) = mulIndicator s f * mulIndicator s g :=
mulIndicator_mul s f g
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_compl_mul_self_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator sᶜ f a * mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
by_cases (fun ha : a ∈ s => by simp [ha]) fun ha => by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_compl_mul_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator sᶜ f * mulIndicator s f = f :=
funext <| mulIndicator_compl_mul_self_apply s f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_self_mul_compl_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator sᶜ f a = f a :=
by_cases (fun ha : a ∈ s => by simp [ha]) fun ha => by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_self_mul_compl (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s f * mulIndicator sᶜ f = f :=
funext <| mulIndicator_self_mul_compl_apply s f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul_eq_left {f g : α → M} (h : Disjoint (mulSupport f) (mulSupport g)) :
(mulSupport f).mulIndicator (f * g) = f := by
refine (mulIndicator_congr fun x hx => ?_).trans mulIndicator_mulSupport
have : g x = 1 := nmem_mulSupport.1 (disjoint_left.1 h hx)
rw [Pi.mul_apply, this, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul_eq_right {f g : α → M} (h : Disjoint (mulSupport f) (mulSupport g)) :
(mulSupport g).mulIndicator (f * g) = g := by
refine (mulIndicator_congr fun x hx => ?_).trans mulIndicator_mulSupport
have : f x = 1 := nmem_mulSupport.1 (disjoint_right.1 h hx)
rw [Pi.mul_apply, this, one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul_compl_eq_piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f g : α → M) :
s.mulIndicator f * sᶜ.mulIndicator g = s.piecewise f g := by
ext x
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· rw [piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ h, Pi.mul_apply, Set.mulIndicator_of_mem h,
Set.mulIndicator_of_not_mem (Set.not_mem_compl_iff.2 h), mul_one]
· rw [piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ h, Pi.mul_apply, Set.mulIndicator_of_not_mem h,
Set.mulIndicator_of_mem (Set.mem_compl h), one_mul]
/-- `Set.mulIndicator` as a `monoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator` as an `addMonoidHom`."]
noncomputable def mulIndicatorHom {α} (M) [MulOneClass M] (s : Set α) : (α → M) →* α → M where
toFun := mulIndicator s
map_one' := mulIndicator_one M s
map_mul' := mulIndicator_mul s
end Monoid
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_inv' (s : Set α) (f : α → G) : mulIndicator s f⁻¹ = (mulIndicator s f)⁻¹ :=
(mulIndicatorHom G s).map_inv f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_inv (s : Set α) (f : α → G) :
(mulIndicator s fun a => (f a)⁻¹) = fun a => (mulIndicator s f a)⁻¹ :=
mulIndicator_inv' s f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_div (s : Set α) (f g : α → G) :
(mulIndicator s fun a => f a / g a) = fun a => mulIndicator s f a / mulIndicator s g a :=
(mulIndicatorHom G s).map_div f g
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_div' (s : Set α) (f g : α → G) :
mulIndicator s (f / g) = mulIndicator s f / mulIndicator s g :=
mulIndicator_div s f g
@[to_additive indicator_compl']
theorem mulIndicator_compl (s : Set α) (f : α → G) :
mulIndicator sᶜ f = f * (mulIndicator s f)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq <| s.mulIndicator_compl_mul_self f
@[to_additive indicator_compl]
theorem mulIndicator_compl' (s : Set α) (f : α → G) :
mulIndicator sᶜ f = f / mulIndicator s f := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mulIndicator_compl]
@[to_additive indicator_diff']
theorem mulIndicator_diff (h : s ⊆ t) (f : α → G) :
mulIndicator (t \ s) f = mulIndicator t f * (mulIndicator s f)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq <| by
rw [Pi.mul_def, ← mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
@[to_additive indicator_diff]
theorem mulIndicator_diff' (h : s ⊆ t) (f : α → G) :
mulIndicator (t \ s) f = mulIndicator t f / mulIndicator s f := by
rw [mulIndicator_diff h, div_eq_mul_inv]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff {g : G → β} (hg : ∀ x, g x⁻¹ = g x)
(s t : Set α) (f : α → G) (x : α) :
g (mulIndicator (s ∆ t) f x) = g (mulIndicator s f x / mulIndicator t f x) := by
by_cases hs : x ∈ s <;> by_cases ht : x ∈ t <;> simp [mem_symmDiff, *]
end Group
end Set
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_mulIndicator {M N : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N)
(s : Set α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : f (s.mulIndicator g x) = s.mulIndicator (f ∘ g) x := by
simp [Set.mulIndicator_comp_of_one]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 523 | 525 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
| Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 180 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Exhaustion
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
/-!
# s-finite measures can be written as `withDensity` of a finite measure
If `μ` is an s-finite measure, then there exists a finite measure `μ.toFinite`
such that a set is `μ`-null iff it is `μ.toFinite`-null.
In particular, `MeasureTheory.ae μ.toFinite = MeasureTheory.ae μ` and `μ.toFinite = 0` iff `μ = 0`.
As a corollary, `μ` can be represented as `μ.toFinite.withDensity (μ.rnDeriv μ.toFinite)`.
Our definition of `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite` ensures some extra properties:
- if `μ` is a finite measure, then `μ.toFinite = μ[|univ] = (μ univ)⁻¹ • μ`;
- in particular, `μ.toFinite = μ` for a probability measure;
- if `μ ≠ 0`, then `μ.toFinite` is a probability measure.
## Main definitions
In these definitions and the results below, `μ` is an s-finite measure (`SFinite μ`).
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite`: a finite measure with `μ ≪ μ.toFinite` and `μ.toFinite ≪ μ`.
If `μ ≠ 0`, this is a probability measure.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.densityToFinite` (deprecated, use `MeasureTheory.Measure.rnDeriv`):
the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `μ.toFinite` with respect to `μ`.
## Main statements
* `absolutelyContinuous_toFinite`: `μ ≪ μ.toFinite`.
* `toFinite_absolutelyContinuous`: `μ.toFinite ≪ μ`.
* `ae_toFinite`: `ae μ.toFinite = ae μ`.
-/
open Set
open scoped ENNReal ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Auxiliary definition for `MeasureTheory.Measure.toFinite`. -/
noncomputable def Measure.toFiniteAux (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : Measure α :=
letI := Classical.dec
if IsFiniteMeasure μ then μ else (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose
/-- A finite measure obtained from an s-finite measure `μ`, such that
`μ = μ.toFinite.withDensity μ.densityToFinite` (see `withDensity_densitytoFinite`).
If `μ` is non-zero, this is a probability measure. -/
noncomputable def Measure.toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : Measure α :=
μ.toFiniteAux[|univ]
@[local simp]
lemma ae_toFiniteAux [SFinite μ] : ae μ.toFiniteAux = ae μ := by
rw [Measure.toFiniteAux]
split_ifs
· simp
· obtain ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose_spec
exact h₂.ae_le.antisymm h₁.ae_le
@[local instance]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_toFiniteAux [SFinite μ] : IsFiniteMeasure μ.toFiniteAux := by
rw [Measure.toFiniteAux]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact (exists_isFiniteMeasure_absolutelyContinuous μ).choose_spec.1
@[simp]
lemma ae_toFinite [SFinite μ] : ae μ.toFinite = ae μ := by
simp [Measure.toFinite, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
@[simp]
lemma toFinite_apply_eq_zero_iff [SFinite μ] {s : Set α} : μ.toFinite s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
simp only [← compl_mem_ae_iff, ae_toFinite]
@[simp]
lemma toFinite_eq_zero_iff [SFinite μ] : μ.toFinite = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, toFinite_apply_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
lemma toFinite_zero : Measure.toFinite (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp
lemma toFinite_eq_self [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ.toFinite = μ := by
rw [Measure.toFinite, Measure.toFiniteAux, if_pos, ProbabilityTheory.cond_univ]
infer_instance
instance [SFinite μ] : IsFiniteMeasure μ.toFinite := by
rw [Measure.toFinite]
infer_instance
instance [SFinite μ] [NeZero μ] : IsProbabilityMeasure μ.toFinite := by
apply ProbabilityTheory.cond_isProbabilityMeasure
simp [ne_eq, ← compl_mem_ae_iff, ae_toFiniteAux]
lemma absolutelyContinuous_toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : μ ≪ μ.toFinite :=
Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous.mp ae_toFinite.ge
lemma sfiniteSeq_absolutelyContinuous_toFinite (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (n : ℕ) :
sfiniteSeq μ n ≪ μ.toFinite :=
(sfiniteSeq_le μ n).absolutelyContinuous.trans (absolutelyContinuous_toFinite μ)
lemma toFinite_absolutelyContinuous (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] : μ.toFinite ≪ μ :=
Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous.mp ae_toFinite.le
lemma restrict_compl_sigmaFiniteSet [SFinite μ] :
μ.restrict μ.sigmaFiniteSetᶜ = ∞ • μ.toFinite.restrict μ.sigmaFiniteSetᶜ := by
rw [Measure.sigmaFiniteSet,
restrict_compl_sigmaFiniteSetWRT (Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl μ)]
ext t ht
simp only [Measure.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
rw [Measure.restrict_apply ht, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
by_cases hμt : μ (t ∩ (μ.sigmaFiniteSetWRT μ)ᶜ) = 0
· rw [hμt, toFinite_absolutelyContinuous μ hμt]
· rw [ENNReal.top_mul hμt, ENNReal.top_mul]
exact fun h ↦ hμt (absolutelyContinuous_toFinite μ h)
end MeasureTheory
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensityFinite.lean | 195 | 210 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
/-!
# List rotation
This file proves basic results about `List.rotate`, the list rotation.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsRotated l₁ l₂`: States that `l₁` is a rotated version of `l₂`.
* `List.cyclicPermutations l`: The list of all cyclic permutants of `l`, up to the length of `l`.
## Tags
rotated, rotation, permutation, cycle
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem rotate'_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [], _ => by simp
| _ :: _, 0 => rfl
| a :: l, n + 1 => by rw [List.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
theorem rotate'_eq_drop_append_take :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length → l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [], n, h => by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l, 0, h => by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| a :: l, n + 1, h => by
have hnl : n ≤ l.length := le_of_succ_le_succ h
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length := by
rw [length_append, length_cons, List.length]; exact le_of_succ_le h
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_drop_append_take hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl]; simp
theorem rotate'_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n m : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).rotate' m = l.rotate' (n + m)
| a :: l, 0, m => by simp
| [], n, m => by simp
| a :: l, n + 1, m => by
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_rotate' _ n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← rotate'_cons_succ,
Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length (l : List α) : rotate' l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate'_eq_drop_append_take le_rfl]; simp
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_length_mul (l : List α) : ∀ n : ℕ, l.rotate' (l.length * n) = l
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 =>
calc
l.rotate' (l.length * (n + 1)) =
(l.rotate' (l.length * n)).rotate' (l.rotate' (l.length * n)).length := by
simp [-rotate'_length, Nat.mul_succ, rotate'_rotate']
_ = l := by rw [rotate'_length, rotate'_length_mul l n]
theorem rotate'_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate' (n % l.length) = l.rotate' n :=
calc
l.rotate' (n % l.length) =
(l.rotate' (n % l.length)).rotate' ((l.rotate' (n % l.length)).length * (n / l.length)) :=
by rw [rotate'_length_mul]
_ = l.rotate' n := by rw [rotate'_rotate', length_rotate', Nat.mod_add_div]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n = l.rotate' n :=
if h : l.length = 0 then by simp_all [length_eq_zero_iff]
else by
rw [← rotate'_mod,
rotate'_eq_drop_append_take (le_of_lt (Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))]
simp [rotate]
@[simp] theorem rotate_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate (n + 1) = (l ++ [a]).rotate n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_cons_succ]
@[simp]
theorem mem_rotate : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ}, a ∈ l.rotate n ↔ a ∈ l
| [], _, n => by simp
| a :: l, _, 0 => by simp
| a :: l, _, n + 1 => by simp [rotate_cons_succ, mem_rotate, or_comm]
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).length = l.length := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', length_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_replicate (a : α) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) : (replicate n a).rotate k = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate_iff.2 ⟨by rw [length_rotate, length_replicate], fun b hb =>
eq_of_mem_replicate <| mem_rotate.1 hb⟩
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ l.length → l.rotate n = l.drop n ++ l.take n := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']; exact rotate'_eq_drop_append_take
theorem rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod {l : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l.drop (n % l.length) ++ l.take (n % l.length) := by
rcases l.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· simp [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm]
rw [← rotate_eq_drop_append_take (n.mod_lt hl).le, rotate_mod]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_append_length_eq (l l' : List α) : (l ++ l').rotate l.length = l' ++ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction l generalizing l'
· simp
· simp_all [rotate']
theorem rotate_rotate (l : List α) (n m : ℕ) : (l.rotate n).rotate m = l.rotate (n + m) := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_rotate']
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length (l : List α) : rotate l l.length = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_length_mul (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (l.length * n) = l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate', rotate'_length_mul]
theorem rotate_perm (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~ l := by
rw [rotate_eq_rotate']
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate'_cons_succ]
exact (hn _).trans (perm_append_singleton _ _)
@[simp]
theorem nodup_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : Nodup (l.rotate n) ↔ Nodup l :=
(rotate_perm l n).nodup_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = [] ↔ l = [] := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [rotate_cons_succ, hn]
theorem nil_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} : [] = l.rotate n ↔ [] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_singleton (x : α) (n : ℕ) : [x].rotate n = [x] :=
rotate_replicate x 1 n
theorem zipWith_rotate_distrib {β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) (l : List α) (l' : List β) (n : ℕ)
(h : l.length = l'.length) :
(zipWith f l l').rotate n = zipWith f (l.rotate n) (l'.rotate n) := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod,
rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, h, zipWith_append, ← drop_zipWith, ←
take_zipWith, List.length_zipWith, h, min_self]
rw [length_drop, length_drop, h]
theorem zipWith_rotate_one {β : Type*} (f : α → α → β) (x y : α) (l : List α) :
zipWith f (x :: y :: l) ((x :: y :: l).rotate 1) = f x y :: zipWith f (y :: l) (l ++ [x]) := by
simp
theorem getElem?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n)[m]? = l[(m + n) % l.length]? := by
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod]
rcases lt_or_le m (l.drop (n % l.length)).length with hm | hm
· rw [getElem?_append_left hm, getElem?_drop, ← add_mod_mod]
rw [length_drop, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt] at hm
rw [mod_eq_of_lt hm, Nat.add_comm]
· have hlt : n % length l < length l := mod_lt _ (m.zero_le.trans_lt hml)
rw [getElem?_append_right hm, getElem?_take_of_lt, length_drop]
· congr 1
rw [length_drop] at hm
have hm' := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 hm
have : n % length l + m - length l < length l := by
rw [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add hm']
exact Nat.add_lt_add hlt hml
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_comm m, ← mod_add_mod, mod_eq_sub_mod hm', mod_eq_of_lt this]
omega
· rwa [Nat.sub_lt_iff_lt_add' hm, length_drop, Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le]
theorem getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (h : k < (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n)[k] =
l[(k + n) % l.length]'(mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.zero_le.trans_lt h)) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_rotate]
exact h.trans_eq (length_rotate _ _)
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated getElem?_rotate (since := "2025-02-14")]
theorem get?_rotate {l : List α} {n m : ℕ} (hml : m < l.length) :
(l.rotate n).get? m = l.get? ((m + n) % l.length) := by
simp only [get?_eq_getElem?, length_rotate, hml, getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_rotate]
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem]
theorem get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin (l.rotate n).length) :
(l.rotate n).get k = l.get ⟨(k + n) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l n ▸ k.pos)⟩ := by
simp [getElem_rotate]
theorem head?_rotate {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) : head? (l.rotate n) = l[n]? := by
rw [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_rotate (n.zero_le.trans_lt h), Nat.zero_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem get_rotate_one (l : List α) (k : Fin (l.rotate 1).length) :
(l.rotate 1).get k = l.get ⟨(k + 1) % l.length, mod_lt _ (length_rotate l 1 ▸ k.pos)⟩ :=
get_rotate l 1 k
/-- A version of `List.getElem_rotate` that represents `l[k]` in terms of
`(List.rotate l n)[⋯]`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.getElem_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem getElem_eq_getElem_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Nat) (hk : k < l.length) :
l[k] = ((l.rotate n)[(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length]'
((Nat.mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm)) := by
rw [getElem_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [hk, (mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)).le]
/-- A version of `List.get_rotate` that represents `List.get l` in terms of
`List.get (List.rotate l n)`, not vice versa. Can be used instead of rewriting `List.get_rotate`
from right to left. -/
theorem get_eq_get_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (k : Fin l.length) :
l.get k = (l.rotate n).get ⟨(l.length - n % l.length + k) % l.length,
(Nat.mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).trans_eq (length_rotate _ _).symm⟩ := by
rw [get_rotate]
refine congr_arg l.get (Fin.eq_of_val_eq ?_)
simp only [mod_add_mod]
rw [← add_mod_mod, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel, add_mod_left, mod_eq_of_lt]
exacts [k.2, (mod_lt _ (k.1.zero_le.trans_lt k.2)).le]
theorem rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [hα : Nonempty α] :
∀ {l : List α}, (∀ n, l.rotate n = l) ↔ ∃ a, l = replicate l.length a
| [] => by simp
| a :: l => ⟨fun h => ⟨a, ext_getElem length_replicate.symm fun n h₁ h₂ => by
rw [getElem_replicate, ← Option.some_inj, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← head?_rotate h₁, h,
head?_cons]⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ n => by rw [hb, rotate_replicate]⟩
theorem rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate [Nonempty α] {l : List α} :
l.rotate 1 = l ↔ ∃ a : α, l = List.replicate l.length a :=
⟨fun h =>
rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mp fun n =>
Nat.rec l.rotate_zero (fun n hn => by rwa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← l.rotate_rotate, hn]) n,
fun h => rotate_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mpr h 1⟩
theorem rotate_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective fun l : List α => l.rotate n := by
rintro l l' (h : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n)
have hle : l.length = l'.length := (l.length_rotate n).symm.trans (h.symm ▸ l'.length_rotate n)
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod, rotate_eq_drop_append_take_mod] at h
obtain ⟨hd, ht⟩ := append_inj h (by simp_all)
rw [← take_append_drop _ l, ht, hd, take_append_drop]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_rotate {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} : l.rotate n = l'.rotate n ↔ l = l' :=
(rotate_injective n).eq_iff
theorem rotate_eq_iff {l l' : List α} {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l' ↔ l = l'.rotate (l'.length - n % l'.length) := by
rw [← @rotate_eq_rotate _ l _ n, rotate_rotate, ← rotate_mod l', add_mod]
rcases l'.length.zero_le.eq_or_lt with hl | hl
· rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero hl.symm, rotate_nil]
· rcases (Nat.zero_le (n % l'.length)).eq_or_lt with hn | hn
· simp [← hn]
· rw [mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt hl hn), Nat.sub_add_cancel, mod_self, rotate_zero]
exact (Nat.mod_lt _ hl).le
@[simp]
theorem rotate_eq_singleton_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : l.rotate n = [x] ↔ l = [x] := by
rw [rotate_eq_iff, rotate_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_rotate_iff {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {x : α} : [x] = l.rotate n ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [eq_comm, rotate_eq_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem reverse_rotate (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
(l.rotate n).reverse = l.reverse.rotate (l.length - n % l.length) := by
rw [← length_reverse, ← rotate_eq_iff]
induction' n with n hn generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· rw [rotate_cons_succ, ← rotate_rotate, hn]
simp
theorem rotate_reverse (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
l.reverse.rotate n = (l.rotate (l.length - n % l.length)).reverse := by
rw [← reverse_reverse l]
simp_rw [reverse_rotate, reverse_reverse, rotate_eq_iff, rotate_rotate, length_rotate,
length_reverse]
rw [← length_reverse]
let k := n % l.reverse.length
rcases hk' : k with - | k'
· simp_all! [k, length_reverse, ← rotate_rotate]
· rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· simp
· rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.sub_add_cancel, rotate_length]
· exact Nat.sub_le _ _
· exact Nat.sub_lt (by simp) (by simp_all! [k])
theorem map_rotate {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
map f (l.rotate n) = (map f l).rotate n := by
induction' n with n hn IH generalizing l
· simp
· rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· simp [hn]
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) (hn : l ≠ []) (i j : ℕ)
(h : l.rotate i = l.rotate j) : i % l.length = j % l.length := by
rw [← rotate_mod l i, ← rotate_mod l j] at h
simpa only [head?_rotate, mod_lt, length_pos_of_ne_nil hn, getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj,
hl.getElem_inj_iff, Fin.ext_iff] using congr_arg head? h
theorem Nodup.rotate_congr_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {i j : ℕ} :
l.rotate i = l.rotate j ↔ i % l.length = j % l.length ∨ l = [] := by
rcases eq_or_ne l [] with rfl | hn
· simp
· simp only [hn, or_false]
refine ⟨hl.rotate_congr hn _ _, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← rotate_mod, h, rotate_mod]
theorem Nodup.rotate_eq_self_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) {n : ℕ} :
l.rotate n = l ↔ n % l.length = 0 ∨ l = [] := by
rw [← zero_mod, ← hl.rotate_congr_iff, rotate_zero]
section IsRotated
variable (l l' : List α)
/-- `IsRotated l₁ l₂` or `l₁ ~r l₂` asserts that `l₁` and `l₂` are cyclic permutations
of each other. This is defined by claiming that `∃ n, l.rotate n = l'`. -/
def IsRotated : Prop :=
∃ n, l.rotate n = l'
@[inherit_doc List.IsRotated]
-- This matches the precedence of the infix `~` for `List.Perm`, and of other relation infixes
infixr:50 " ~r " => IsRotated
variable {l l'}
@[refl]
theorem IsRotated.refl (l : List α) : l ~r l :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
@[symm]
theorem IsRotated.symm (h : l ~r l') : l' ~r l := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· exists 0
· use (hd :: tl).length * n - n
rw [rotate_rotate, Nat.add_sub_cancel', rotate_length_mul]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (by simp)
theorem isRotated_comm : l ~r l' ↔ l' ~r l :=
⟨IsRotated.symm, IsRotated.symm⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem IsRotated.forall (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate n ~r l :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[trans]
theorem IsRotated.trans : ∀ {l l' l'' : List α}, l ~r l' → l' ~r l'' → l ~r l''
| _, _, _, ⟨n, rfl⟩, ⟨m, rfl⟩ => ⟨n + m, by rw [rotate_rotate]⟩
theorem IsRotated.eqv : Equivalence (@IsRotated α) :=
Equivalence.mk IsRotated.refl IsRotated.symm IsRotated.trans
/-- The relation `List.IsRotated l l'` forms a `Setoid` of cycles. -/
def IsRotated.setoid (α : Type*) : Setoid (List α) where
r := IsRotated
iseqv := IsRotated.eqv
theorem IsRotated.perm (h : l ~r l') : l ~ l' :=
Exists.elim h fun _ hl => hl ▸ (rotate_perm _ _).symm
theorem IsRotated.nodup_iff (h : l ~r l') : Nodup l ↔ Nodup l' :=
h.perm.nodup_iff
theorem IsRotated.mem_iff (h : l ~r l') {a : α} : a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ l' :=
h.perm.mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff : l ~r [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_nil_iff' : [] ~r l ↔ [] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_nil_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_singleton_iff {x : α} : l ~r [x] ↔ l = [x] :=
⟨fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => by simpa using hn, fun h => h ▸ by rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_singleton_iff' {x : α} : [x] ~r l ↔ [x] = l := by
rw [isRotated_comm, isRotated_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
theorem isRotated_concat (hd : α) (tl : List α) : (tl ++ [hd]) ~r (hd :: tl) :=
IsRotated.symm ⟨1, by simp⟩
theorem isRotated_append : (l ++ l') ~r (l' ++ l) :=
⟨l.length, by simp⟩
theorem IsRotated.reverse (h : l ~r l') : l.reverse ~r l'.reverse := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, (reverse_rotate _ _).symm⟩
theorem isRotated_reverse_comm_iff : l.reverse ~r l' ↔ l ~r l'.reverse := by
constructor <;>
· intro h
simpa using h.reverse
@[simp]
theorem isRotated_reverse_iff : l.reverse ~r l'.reverse ↔ l ~r l' := by
simp [isRotated_reverse_comm_iff]
theorem isRotated_iff_mod : l ~r l' ↔ ∃ n ≤ l.length, l.rotate n = l' := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, _, h⟩ => ⟨n, h⟩⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp
· refine ⟨n % (hd :: tl).length, ?_, rotate_mod _ _⟩
refine (Nat.mod_lt _ ?_).le
simp
theorem isRotated_iff_mem_map_range : l ~r l' ↔ l' ∈ (List.range (l.length + 1)).map l.rotate := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, isRotated_iff_mod]
exact
⟨fun ⟨n, hn, h⟩ => ⟨n, Nat.lt_succ_of_le hn, h⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, h⟩ => ⟨n, Nat.le_of_lt_succ hn, h⟩⟩
theorem IsRotated.map {β : Type*} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ ~r l₂) (f : α → β) :
map f l₁ ~r map f l₂ := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h
rw [map_rotate]
use n
theorem IsRotated.cons_getLast_dropLast
(L : List α) (hL : L ≠ []) : L.getLast hL :: L.dropLast ~r L := by
induction L using List.reverseRecOn with
| nil => simp at hL
| append_singleton a L _ =>
simp only [getLast_append, dropLast_concat]
apply IsRotated.symm
apply isRotated_concat
theorem IsRotated.dropLast_tail {α}
{L : List α} (hL : L ≠ []) (hL' : L.head hL = L.getLast hL) : L.dropLast ~r L.tail :=
match L with
| [] => by simp
| [_] => by simp
| a :: b :: L => by
simp only [head_cons, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, getLast_cons] at hL'
simp [hL', IsRotated.cons_getLast_dropLast]
/-- List of all cyclic permutations of `l`.
The `cyclicPermutations` of a nonempty list `l` will always contain `List.length l` elements.
This implies that under certain conditions, there are duplicates in `List.cyclicPermutations l`.
The `n`th entry is equal to `l.rotate n`, proven in `List.get_cyclicPermutations`.
The proof that every cyclic permutant of `l` is in the list is `List.mem_cyclicPermutations_iff`.
cyclicPermutations [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] =
[[1, 2, 3, 2, 4], [2, 3, 2, 4, 1], [3, 2, 4, 1, 2],
[2, 4, 1, 2, 3], [4, 1, 2, 3, 2]] -/
def cyclicPermutations : List α → List (List α)
| [] => [[]]
| l@(_ :: _) => dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails l) (inits l))
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_nil : cyclicPermutations ([] : List α) = [[]] :=
rfl
theorem cyclicPermutations_cons (x : α) (l : List α) :
cyclicPermutations (x :: l) = dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails (x :: l)) (inits (x :: l))) :=
rfl
theorem cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []) :
cyclicPermutations l = dropLast (zipWith (· ++ ·) (tails l) (inits l)) := by
obtain ⟨hd, tl, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_ne_nil h
exact cyclicPermutations_cons _ _
theorem length_cyclicPermutations_cons (x : α) (l : List α) :
length (cyclicPermutations (x :: l)) = length l + 1 := by simp [cyclicPermutations_cons]
@[simp]
theorem length_cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []) :
length (cyclicPermutations l) = length l := by simp [cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil _ h]
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_ne_nil : ∀ l : List α, cyclicPermutations l ≠ []
| a::l, h => by simpa using congr_arg length h
@[simp]
theorem getElem_cyclicPermutations (l : List α) (n : Nat) (h : n < length (cyclicPermutations l)) :
(cyclicPermutations l)[n] = l.rotate n := by
cases l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l =>
simp only [cyclicPermutations_cons, getElem_dropLast, getElem_zipWith, getElem_tails,
getElem_inits]
rw [rotate_eq_drop_append_take (by simpa using h.le)]
theorem get_cyclicPermutations (l : List α) (n : Fin (length (cyclicPermutations l))) :
(cyclicPermutations l).get n = l.rotate n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem head_cyclicPermutations (l : List α) :
(cyclicPermutations l).head (cyclicPermutations_ne_nil l) = l := by
have h : 0 < length (cyclicPermutations l) := length_pos_of_ne_nil (cyclicPermutations_ne_nil _)
rw [← get_mk_zero h, get_cyclicPermutations, Fin.val_mk, rotate_zero]
@[simp]
theorem head?_cyclicPermutations (l : List α) : (cyclicPermutations l).head? = l := by
rw [head?_eq_head, head_cyclicPermutations]
theorem cyclicPermutations_injective : Function.Injective (@cyclicPermutations α) := fun l l' h ↦ by
simpa using congr_arg head? h
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_inj {l l' : List α} :
cyclicPermutations l = cyclicPermutations l' ↔ l = l' :=
cyclicPermutations_injective.eq_iff
theorem length_mem_cyclicPermutations (l : List α) (h : l' ∈ cyclicPermutations l) :
length l' = length l := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := get_of_mem h
simp
theorem mem_cyclicPermutations_self (l : List α) : l ∈ cyclicPermutations l := by
simpa using head_mem (cyclicPermutations_ne_nil l)
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_rotate (l : List α) (k : ℕ) :
(l.rotate k).cyclicPermutations = l.cyclicPermutations.rotate k := by
have : (l.rotate k).cyclicPermutations.length = length (l.cyclicPermutations.rotate k) := by
cases l
· simp
· rw [length_cyclicPermutations_of_ne_nil] <;> simp
refine ext_get this fun n hn hn' => ?_
rw [get_rotate, get_cyclicPermutations, rotate_rotate, ← rotate_mod, Nat.add_comm]
cases l <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_cyclicPermutations_iff : l ∈ cyclicPermutations l' ↔ l ~r l' := by
constructor
· simp_rw [mem_iff_get, get_cyclicPermutations]
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact .forall _ _
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [cyclicPermutations_rotate, mem_rotate]
apply mem_cyclicPermutations_self
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} : cyclicPermutations l = [[]] ↔ l = [] :=
cyclicPermutations_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp]
theorem cyclicPermutations_eq_singleton_iff {l : List α} {x : α} :
cyclicPermutations l = [[x]] ↔ l = [x] :=
cyclicPermutations_injective.eq_iff' rfl
| /-- If a `l : List α` is `Nodup l`, then all of its cyclic permutants are distinct. -/
protected theorem Nodup.cyclicPermutations {l : List α} (hn : Nodup l) :
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 588 | 589 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Isabel Longbottom, Kim Morrison, Apurva Nakade, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.PGame.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Combinatorial games.
In this file we construct an instance `OrderedAddCommGroup SetTheory.Game`.
## Multiplication on pre-games
We define the operations of multiplication and inverse on pre-games, and prove a few basic theorems
about them. Multiplication is not well-behaved under equivalence of pre-games i.e. `x ≈ y` does not
imply `x * z ≈ y * z`. Hence, multiplication is not a well-defined operation on games. Nevertheless,
the abelian group structure on games allows us to simplify many proofs for pre-games.
-/
-- Porting note: many definitions here are noncomputable as the compiler does not support PGame.rec
noncomputable section
namespace SetTheory
open Function PGame
universe u
-- Porting note: moved the setoid instance to PGame.lean
/-- The type of combinatorial games. In ZFC, a combinatorial game is constructed from
two sets of combinatorial games that have been constructed at an earlier
stage. To do this in type theory, we say that a combinatorial pre-game is built
inductively from two families of combinatorial games indexed over any type
in Type u. The resulting type `PGame.{u}` lives in `Type (u+1)`,
reflecting that it is a proper class in ZFC.
A combinatorial game is then constructed by quotienting by the equivalence
`x ≈ y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x`. -/
abbrev Game :=
Quotient PGame.setoid
namespace Game
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11445): added this definition
/-- Negation of games. -/
instance : Neg Game where
neg := Quot.map Neg.neg <| fun _ _ => (neg_equiv_neg_iff).2
instance : Zero Game where zero := ⟦0⟧
instance : Add Game where
add := Quotient.map₂ HAdd.hAdd <| fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => PGame.add_congr hx hy
instance instAddCommGroupWithOneGame : AddCommGroupWithOne Game where
zero := ⟦0⟧
one := ⟦1⟧
add_zero := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact Quot.sound (add_zero_equiv x)
zero_add := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact Quot.sound (zero_add_equiv x)
add_assoc := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨z⟩
exact Quot.sound add_assoc_equiv
neg_add_cancel := Quotient.ind <| fun x => Quot.sound (neg_add_cancel_equiv x)
add_comm := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quot.sound add_comm_equiv
nsmul := nsmulRec
zsmul := zsmulRec
instance : Inhabited Game :=
⟨0⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Game) = ⟦0⟧ :=
rfl
instance instPartialOrderGame : PartialOrder Game where
le := Quotient.lift₂ (· ≤ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (le_congr hx hy)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
exact le_refl x
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨z⟩
exact @le_trans _ _ x y z
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ h₁ h₂
apply Quot.sound
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lt := Quotient.lift₂ (· < ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lt_congr hx hy)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact @lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ x y
/-- The less or fuzzy relation on games.
If `0 ⧏ x` (less or fuzzy with), then Left can win `x` as the first player. -/
def LF : Game → Game → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PGame.LF fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (lf_congr hx hy)
/-- On `Game`, simp-normal inequalities should use as few negations as possible. -/
@[simp]
theorem not_le : ∀ {x y : Game}, ¬x ≤ y ↔ Game.LF y x := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact PGame.not_le
/-- On `Game`, simp-normal inequalities should use as few negations as possible. -/
@[simp]
theorem not_lf : ∀ {x y : Game}, ¬Game.LF x y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact PGame.not_lf
/-- The fuzzy, confused, or incomparable relation on games.
If `x ‖ 0`, then the first player can always win `x`. -/
def Fuzzy : Game → Game → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PGame.Fuzzy fun _ _ _ _ hx hy => propext (fuzzy_congr hx hy)
-- Porting note: had to replace ⧏ with LF, otherwise cannot differentiate with the operator on PGame
instance : IsTrichotomous Game LF :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
change _ ∨ ⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ ∨ _
rw [Quotient.eq]
apply lf_or_equiv_or_gf⟩
/-! It can be useful to use these lemmas to turn `PGame` inequalities into `Game` inequalities, as
the `AddCommGroup` structure on `Game` often simplifies many proofs. -/
end Game
namespace PGame
-- Porting note: In a lot of places, I had to add explicitly that the quotient element was a Game.
-- In Lean4, quotients don't have the setoid as an instance argument,
-- but as an explicit argument, see https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/confusion.20between.20equivalence.20and.20instance.20setoid/near/360822354
theorem le_iff_game_le {x y : PGame} : x ≤ y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) ≤ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lf_iff_game_lf {x y : PGame} : x ⧏ y ↔ Game.LF ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_game_lt {x y : PGame} : x < y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) < ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem equiv_iff_game_eq {x y : PGame} : x ≈ y ↔ (⟦x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y⟧ :=
(@Quotient.eq' _ _ x y).symm
alias ⟨game_eq, _⟩ := equiv_iff_game_eq
theorem fuzzy_iff_game_fuzzy {x y : PGame} : x ‖ y ↔ Game.Fuzzy ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧ :=
Iff.rfl
end PGame
namespace Game
local infixl:50 " ⧏ " => LF
local infixl:50 " ‖ " => Fuzzy
instance addLeftMono : AddLeftMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_le_add_left _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addRightMono : AddRightMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_le_add_right _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
instance addRightStrictMono : AddRightStrictMono Game :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h
exact @add_lt_add_right _ _ _ _ b c h a⟩
theorem add_lf_add_right : ∀ {b c : Game} (_ : b ⧏ c) (a), (b + a : Game) ⧏ c + a := by
rintro ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h ⟨a⟩
apply PGame.add_lf_add_right h
theorem add_lf_add_left : ∀ {b c : Game} (_ : b ⧏ c) (a), (a + b : Game) ⧏ a + c := by
rintro ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ h ⟨a⟩
apply PGame.add_lf_add_left h
instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid Game :=
{ add_le_add_left := @add_le_add_left _ _ _ Game.addLeftMono }
/-- A small family of games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Game.{u}) :
BddAbove (Set.range f) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := PGame.bddAbove_range_of_small (Quotient.out ∘ f)
refine ⟨⟦x⟧, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [PGame.le_iff_game_le] using hx <| Set.mem_range_self i
/-- A small set of games is bounded above. -/
lemma bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Game.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s := by
simpa using bddAbove_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → Game.{u})
/-- A small family of games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_range_of_small {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Game.{u}) :
BddBelow (Set.range f) := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := PGame.bddBelow_range_of_small (Quotient.out ∘ f)
refine ⟨⟦x⟧, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun i ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [PGame.le_iff_game_le] using hx <| Set.mem_range_self i
/-- A small set of games is bounded below. -/
lemma bddBelow_of_small (s : Set Game.{u}) [Small.{u} s] : BddBelow s := by
simpa using bddBelow_range_of_small (Subtype.val : s → Game.{u})
end Game
namespace PGame
@[simp] theorem quot_zero : (⟦0⟧ : Game) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_one : (⟦1⟧ : Game) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_neg (a : PGame) : (⟦-a⟧ : Game) = -⟦a⟧ := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_add (a b : PGame) : ⟦a + b⟧ = (⟦a⟧ : Game) + ⟦b⟧ := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_sub (a b : PGame) : ⟦a - b⟧ = (⟦a⟧ : Game) - ⟦b⟧ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quot_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, ⟦(n : PGame)⟧ = (n : Game)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [PGame.nat_succ, quot_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, quot_natCast]
rfl
theorem quot_eq_of_mk'_quot_eq {x y : PGame} (L : x.LeftMoves ≃ y.LeftMoves)
(R : x.RightMoves ≃ y.RightMoves) (hl : ∀ i, (⟦x.moveLeft i⟧ : Game) = ⟦y.moveLeft (L i)⟧)
(hr : ∀ j, (⟦x.moveRight j⟧ : Game) = ⟦y.moveRight (R j)⟧) : (⟦x⟧ : Game) = ⟦y⟧ :=
game_eq (.of_equiv L R (fun _ => equiv_iff_game_eq.2 (hl _))
(fun _ => equiv_iff_game_eq.2 (hr _)))
/-! Multiplicative operations can be defined at the level of pre-games,
but to prove their properties we need to use the abelian group structure of games.
Hence we define them here. -/
/-- The product of `x = {xL | xR}` and `y = {yL | yR}` is
`{xL*y + x*yL - xL*yL, xR*y + x*yR - xR*yR | xL*y + x*yR - xL*yR, xR*y + x*yL - xR*yL}`. -/
instance : Mul PGame.{u} :=
⟨fun x y => by
induction x generalizing y with | mk xl xr _ _ IHxl IHxr => _
induction y with | mk yl yr yL yR IHyl IHyr => _
have y := mk yl yr yL yR
refine ⟨(xl × yl) ⊕ (xr × yr), (xl × yr) ⊕ (xr × yl), ?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro (⟨i, j⟩ | ⟨i, j⟩)
· exact IHxl i y + IHyl j - IHxl i (yL j)
· exact IHxr i y + IHyr j - IHxr i (yR j)
· exact IHxl i y + IHyr j - IHxl i (yR j)
· exact IHxr i y + IHyl j - IHxr i (yL j)⟩
theorem leftMoves_mul :
∀ x y : PGame.{u},
(x * y).LeftMoves = (x.LeftMoves × y.LeftMoves ⊕ x.RightMoves × y.RightMoves)
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
theorem rightMoves_mul :
∀ x y : PGame.{u},
(x * y).RightMoves = (x.LeftMoves × y.RightMoves ⊕ x.RightMoves × y.LeftMoves)
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- Turns two left or right moves for `x` and `y` into a left move for `x * y` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toLeftMovesMul {x y : PGame} :
(x.LeftMoves × y.LeftMoves) ⊕ (x.RightMoves × y.RightMoves) ≃ (x * y).LeftMoves :=
Equiv.cast (leftMoves_mul x y).symm
/-- Turns a left and a right move for `x` and `y` into a right move for `x * y` and vice versa.
Even though these types are the same (not definitionally so), this is the preferred way to convert
between them. -/
def toRightMovesMul {x y : PGame} :
(x.LeftMoves × y.RightMoves) ⊕ (x.RightMoves × y.LeftMoves) ≃ (x * y).RightMoves :=
Equiv.cast (rightMoves_mul x y).symm
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveLeft_inl {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveLeft (Sum.inl (i, j)) =
xL i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yL j - xL i * yL j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveLeft_inl {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveLeft (toLeftMovesMul (Sum.inl (i, j))) =
x.moveLeft i * y + x * y.moveLeft j - x.moveLeft i * y.moveLeft j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveLeft_inr {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveLeft (Sum.inr (i, j)) =
xR i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yR j - xR i * yR j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveLeft_inr {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveLeft (toLeftMovesMul (Sum.inr (i, j))) =
x.moveRight i * y + x * y.moveRight j - x.moveRight i * y.moveRight j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveRight_inl {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
(mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveRight (Sum.inl (i, j)) =
xL i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yR j - xL i * yR j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveRight_inl {x y : PGame} {i j} :
(x * y).moveRight (toRightMovesMul (Sum.inl (i, j))) =
x.moveLeft i * y + x * y.moveRight j - x.moveLeft i * y.moveRight j := by
cases x
cases y
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul_moveRight_inr {xl xr yl yr} {xL xR yL yR} {i j} :
| (mk xl xr xL xR * mk yl yr yL yR).moveRight (Sum.inr (i, j)) =
xR i * mk yl yr yL yR + mk xl xr xL xR * yL j - xR i * yL j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_moveRight_inr {x y : PGame} {i j} :
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Basic.lean | 328 | 333 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.CommShift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
/-! Shifted morphisms
Given a category `C` endowed with a shift by an additive monoid `M` and two
objects `X` and `Y` in `C`, we consider the types `ShiftedHom X Y m`
defined as `X ⟶ (Y⟦m⟧)` for all `m : M`, and the composition on these
shifted hom.
## TODO
* redefine Ext-groups in abelian categories using `ShiftedHom` in the derived category.
* study the `R`-module structures on `ShiftedHom` when `C` is `R`-linear
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D] {E : Type*} [Category E]
{M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] [HasShift C M] [HasShift D M] [HasShift E M]
/-- In a category `C` equipped with a shift by an additive monoid,
this is the type of morphisms `X ⟶ (Y⟦n⟧)` for `m : M`. -/
def ShiftedHom (X Y : C) (m : M) : Type _ := X ⟶ (Y⟦m⟧)
instance [Preadditive C] (X Y : C) (n : M) : AddCommGroup (ShiftedHom X Y n) := by
dsimp only [ShiftedHom]
infer_instance
namespace ShiftedHom
variable {X Y Z T : C}
/-- The composition of `f : X ⟶ Y⟦a⟧` and `g : Y ⟶ Z⟦b⟧`, as a morphism `X ⟶ Z⟦c⟧`
when `b + a = c`. -/
noncomputable def comp {a b c : M} (f : ShiftedHom X Y a) (g : ShiftedHom Y Z b) (h : b + a = c) :
ShiftedHom X Z c :=
f ≫ g⟦a⟧' ≫ (shiftFunctorAdd' C b a c h).inv.app _
lemma comp_assoc {a₁ a₂ a₃ a₁₂ a₂₃ a : M}
(α : ShiftedHom X Y a₁) (β : ShiftedHom Y Z a₂) (γ : ShiftedHom Z T a₃)
(h₁₂ : a₂ + a₁ = a₁₂) (h₂₃ : a₃ + a₂ = a₂₃) (h : a₃ + a₂ + a₁ = a) :
(α.comp β h₁₂).comp γ (show a₃ + a₁₂ = a by rw [← h₁₂, ← add_assoc, h]) =
α.comp (β.comp γ h₂₃) (by rw [← h₂₃, h]) := by
simp only [comp, assoc, Functor.map_comp,
shiftFunctorAdd'_assoc_inv_app a₃ a₂ a₁ a₂₃ a₁₂ a h₂₃ h₁₂ h,
← NatTrans.naturality_assoc, Functor.comp_map]
/-! In degree `0 : M`, shifted hom `ShiftedHom X Y 0` identify to morphisms `X ⟶ Y`.
We generalize this to `m₀ : M` such that `m₀ : 0` as it shall be convenient when we
apply this with `M := ℤ` and `m₀` the coercion of `0 : ℕ`. -/
/-- The element of `ShiftedHom X Y m₀` (when `m₀ = 0`) attached to a morphism `X ⟶ Y`. -/
noncomputable def mk₀ (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) (f : X ⟶ Y) : ShiftedHom X Y m₀ :=
f ≫ (shiftFunctorZero' C m₀ hm₀).inv.app Y
/-- The bijection `(X ⟶ Y) ≃ ShiftedHom X Y m₀` when `m₀ = 0`. -/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def homEquiv (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ ShiftedHom X Y m₀ where
toFun f := mk₀ m₀ hm₀ f
invFun g := g ≫ (shiftFunctorZero' C m₀ hm₀).hom.app Y
left_inv f := by simp [mk₀]
right_inv g := by simp [mk₀]
lemma mk₀_comp (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) (f : X ⟶ Y) {a : M} (g : ShiftedHom Y Z a) :
(mk₀ m₀ hm₀ f).comp g (by rw [hm₀, add_zero]) = f ≫ g := by
subst hm₀
simp [comp, mk₀, shiftFunctorAdd'_add_zero_inv_app, shiftFunctorZero']
@[simp]
lemma mk₀_id_comp (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) {a : M} (f : ShiftedHom X Y a) :
(mk₀ m₀ hm₀ (𝟙 X)).comp f (by rw [hm₀, add_zero]) = f := by
simp [mk₀_comp]
lemma comp_mk₀ {a : M} (f : ShiftedHom X Y a) (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
f.comp (mk₀ m₀ hm₀ g) (by rw [hm₀, zero_add]) = f ≫ g⟦a⟧' := by
subst hm₀
simp only [comp, shiftFunctorAdd'_zero_add_inv_app, mk₀, shiftFunctorZero',
eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_trans, ← Functor.map_comp, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app,
Functor.id_obj, comp_id]
| @[simp]
lemma comp_mk₀_id {a : M} (f : ShiftedHom X Y a) (m₀ : M) (hm₀ : m₀ = 0) :
f.comp (mk₀ m₀ hm₀ (𝟙 Y)) (by rw [hm₀, zero_add]) = f := by
simp [comp_mk₀]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Shift/ShiftedHom.lean | 90 | 93 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
@[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
@[to_additive nsmul_sub]
lemma div_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_sub]
lemma div_zpow (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_zpow, inv_zpow]
attribute [field_simps] div_pow div_zpow
end DivisionCommMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b c d : G} {n : ℤ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_inv_self : a / b = b⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_eq_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_surjective (a : G) : Surjective (a * ·) :=
fun x ↦ ⟨a⁻¹ * x, mul_inv_cancel_left a x⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_surjective (a : G) : Function.Surjective fun x ↦ x * a := fun x ↦
⟨x * a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_right x a⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (h : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (h : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul (h : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left, fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv]
/-- Variant of `mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv` with swapped equality. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv' : a * b = 1 ↔ b = a⁻¹ := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq, eq_comm]
/-- Variant of `mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq` with swapped equality. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq' : a * b = 1 ↔ b⁻¹ = a := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one : a = b⁻¹ ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_one : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inj]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem conj_eq_one_iff : a * b * a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_eq_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_left_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ a / b := by
-- FIXME this could be by `simpa`, but it fails. This is probably a bug in `simpa`.
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ mul_left_injective b⁻¹ h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_injective : Function.Injective fun a ↦ b / a := by
-- FIXME see above
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact fun a a' h ↦ inv_injective (mul_right_injective b h)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma div_mul_cancel_right (a b : G) : a / (b * a) = b⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_div, mul_div_cancel_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_mul_right_eq_div (a b c : G) : a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_div_swap]; simp only [mul_left_inj, eq_self_iff_true, mul_div_cancel_right]
@[to_additive eq_sub_of_add_eq]
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq' (h : a * c = b) : a = b / c := by simp [← h]
@[to_additive sub_eq_of_eq_add]
theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul'' (h : a = c * b) : a / b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq (h : a / c = b) : a = b * c := by simp [← h]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_div (h : a = c / b) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_right_inj : a / b = a / c ↔ b = c :=
div_right_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_left_inj : b / a = c / a ↔ b = c := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact mul_left_inj _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_div_cancel (a b c : G) : a / b * (b / c) = a / c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_div_cancel_right (a b c : G) : a / c / (b / c) = a / b := by
rw [← inv_div c b, div_inv_eq_mul, div_mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_one : a / b = 1 ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_div_eq_one, fun h ↦ by rw [h, div_self']⟩
alias ⟨_, div_eq_one_of_eq⟩ := div_eq_one
alias ⟨_, sub_eq_zero_of_eq⟩ := sub_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one : a / b ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr div_eq_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_self : a / b = a ↔ b = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_eq_left, inv_eq_one]
@[to_additive eq_sub_iff_add_eq]
theorem eq_div_iff_mul_eq' : a = b / c ↔ a * c = b := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul : a / b = c ↔ a = c * b := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_eq_of_div_eq_div (H : a / b = c / d) : a = b ↔ c = d := by
rw [← div_eq_one, H, div_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_div_mul_left (c : G) : Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ x / c) fun x ↦ x * c :=
fun x ↦ mul_div_cancel_right x c
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_mul_left_div (c : G) : Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ x * c) fun x ↦ x / c :=
fun x ↦ div_mul_cancel x c
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_mul_right_inv_mul (c : G) :
Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ c * x) fun x ↦ c⁻¹ * x :=
fun x ↦ mul_inv_cancel_left c x
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv_mul_mul_right (c : G) :
Function.LeftInverse (fun x ↦ c⁻¹ * x) fun x ↦ c * x :=
fun x ↦ inv_mul_cancel_left c x
@[to_additive (attr := simp) natAbs_nsmul_eq_zero]
lemma pow_natAbs_eq_one : a ^ n.natAbs = 1 ↔ a ^ n = 1 := by cases n <;> simp
@[to_additive sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub (a : G) {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq <| by rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_neg]
theorem inv_pow_sub (a : G) {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : a⁻¹ ^ (m - n) = (a ^ m)⁻¹ * a ^ n := by
rw [pow_sub a⁻¹ h, inv_pow, inv_pow, inv_inv]
@[to_additive add_one_zsmul]
lemma zpow_add_one (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (n + 1) = a ^ n * a
| (n : ℕ) => by simp only [← Int.natCast_succ, zpow_natCast, pow_succ]
| -1 => by simp [Int.add_left_neg]
| .negSucc (n + 1) => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, pow_succ', mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
rw [Int.negSucc_eq, Int.neg_add, Int.neg_add_cancel_right]
exact zpow_negSucc _ _
@[to_additive sub_one_zsmul]
lemma zpow_sub_one (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n * a⁻¹ :=
calc
a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ (n - 1) * a * a⁻¹ := (mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a ^ n * a⁻¹ := by rw [← zpow_add_one, Int.sub_add_cancel]
@[to_additive add_zsmul]
lemma zpow_add (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m + n) = a ^ m * a ^ n := by
induction n with
| hz => simp
| hp n ihn => simp only [← Int.add_assoc, zpow_add_one, ihn, mul_assoc]
| hn n ihn => rw [zpow_sub_one, ← mul_assoc, ← ihn, ← zpow_sub_one, Int.add_sub_assoc]
@[to_additive one_add_zsmul]
lemma zpow_one_add (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ (1 + n) = a * a ^ n := by rw [zpow_add, zpow_one]
@[to_additive add_zsmul_self]
lemma mul_self_zpow (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a * a ^ n = a ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [Int.add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one]
@[to_additive add_self_zsmul]
lemma mul_zpow_self (a : G) (n : ℤ) : a ^ n * a = a ^ (n + 1) := (zpow_add_one ..).symm
@[to_additive sub_zsmul] lemma zpow_sub (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m - n) = a ^ m * (a ^ n)⁻¹ := by
rw [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, zpow_add, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive natCast_sub_natCast_zsmul]
lemma zpow_natCast_sub_natCast (a : G) (m n : ℕ) : a ^ (m - n : ℤ) = a ^ m / a ^ n := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using zpow_sub a m n
@[to_additive natCast_sub_one_zsmul]
lemma zpow_natCast_sub_one (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (n - 1 : ℤ) = a ^ n / a := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using zpow_sub a n 1
@[to_additive one_sub_natCast_zsmul]
lemma zpow_one_sub_natCast (a : G) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (1 - n : ℤ) = a / a ^ n := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using zpow_sub a 1 n
@[to_additive] lemma zpow_mul_comm (a : G) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ m * a ^ n = a ^ n * a ^ m := by
rw [← zpow_add, Int.add_comm, zpow_add]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_emod {x : G} (m : ℤ) {n : ℤ} (h : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m = x ^ (m % n) :=
calc
x ^ m = x ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Int.emod_add_ediv]
_ = x ^ (m % n) := by simp [zpow_add, zpow_mul, h]
theorem zpow_eq_zpow_emod' {x : G} (m : ℤ) {n : ℕ} (h : x ^ n = 1) :
x ^ m = x ^ (m % (n : ℤ)) := zpow_eq_zpow_emod m (by simpa)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma zpow_iterate (k : ℤ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : G ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp [Int.pow_zero]
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [zpow_iterate, Int.pow_succ', zpow_mul]
/-- To show a property of all powers of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under multiplication
by `g` and `g⁻¹` on the left. For subgroups generated by more than one element, see
`Subgroup.closure_induction_left`. -/
@[to_additive "To show a property of all multiples of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under
addition by `g` and `-g` on the left. For additive subgroups generated by more than one element, see
`AddSubgroup.closure_induction_left`."]
lemma zpow_induction_left {g : G} {P : G → Prop} (h_one : P (1 : G))
(h_mul : ∀ a, P a → P (g * a)) (h_inv : ∀ a, P a → P (g⁻¹ * a)) (n : ℤ) : P (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| hz => rwa [zpow_zero]
| hp n ih =>
rw [Int.add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one]
exact h_mul _ ih
| hn n ih =>
rw [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, Int.add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_neg_one]
exact h_inv _ ih
/-- To show a property of all powers of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under multiplication
by `g` and `g⁻¹` on the right. For subgroups generated by more than one element, see
`Subgroup.closure_induction_right`. -/
@[to_additive "To show a property of all multiples of `g` it suffices to show it is closed under
addition by `g` and `-g` on the right. For additive subgroups generated by more than one element,
see `AddSubgroup.closure_induction_right`."]
lemma zpow_induction_right {g : G} {P : G → Prop} (h_one : P (1 : G))
(h_mul : ∀ a, P a → P (a * g)) (h_inv : ∀ a, P a → P (a * g⁻¹)) (n : ℤ) : P (g ^ n) := by
induction n with
| hz => rwa [zpow_zero]
| hp n ih =>
rw [zpow_add_one]
exact h_mul _ ih
| hn n ih =>
rw [zpow_sub_one]
exact h_inv _ ih
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [CommGroup G] {a b c d : G}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul' {a b c : G} (h : a = b * c) : a / b = c := by
rw [h, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, inv_mul_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_mul_left_eq_div (a b c : G) : c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm b⁻¹ c⁻¹, mul_comm c a, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc c,
mul_inv_cancel, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive eq_sub_of_add_eq']
theorem eq_div_of_mul_eq'' (h : c * a = b) : a = b / c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq' (h : a / b = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_div' (h : b = c / a) : a * b = c := by
rw [h, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm c, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[to_additive sub_sub_self]
theorem div_div_self' (a b : G) : a / (a / b) = b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_mul_div (a b c : G) : a / b = c / b * (a / c) := by simp [mul_left_comm c]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_cancel (a b : G) : a / (a / b) = b :=
div_div_self' a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_cancel_left (a b : G) : a / b / a = b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive eq_sub_iff_add_eq']
theorem eq_div_iff_mul_eq'' : a = b / c ↔ c * a = b := by rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq', mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul' : a / b = c ↔ a = b * c := by rw [div_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_cancel_left (a b : G) : a * b / a = b := by rw [div_eq_inv_mul, inv_mul_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a b : G) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc, mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_cancel_left (a b : G) : a / (a * b) = b⁻¹ := by rw [← inv_div, mul_div_cancel_left]
-- This lemma is in the `simp` set under the name `mul_inv_cancel_comm_assoc`,
-- along with the additive version `add_neg_cancel_comm_assoc`,
-- defined in `Algebra.Group.Commute`
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_inv_cancel'_right (a b : G) : a * (b * a⁻¹) = b := by
rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel a b]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_mul_div_cancel (a b c : G) : a * c * (b / c) = a * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_mul_cancel (a b c : G) : a / c * (b * c) = a * b := by
rw [mul_left_comm, div_mul_cancel, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_mul_div_cancel' (a b c : G) : a / b * (c / a) = c / b := by
rw [mul_comm]; apply div_mul_div_cancel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_div_div_cancel (a b c : G) : a * b / (a / c) = b * c := by
rw [← div_mul, mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_div_div_cancel_left (a b c : G) : c / a / (c / b) = b / a := by
rw [← inv_div b c, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm, div_mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_mul_eq_mul : a / b = c / d ↔ a * d = c * b := by
rw [div_eq_iff_eq_mul, div_mul_eq_mul_div, eq_comm, div_eq_iff_eq_mul']
simp only [mul_comm, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_div_eq_div : a / b = c / d ↔ a / c = b / d := by
rw [div_eq_iff_eq_mul, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_eq_iff_eq_mul', mul_div_assoc]
end CommGroup
section multiplicative
variable [Monoid β] (p r : α → α → Prop) [IsTotal α r] (f : α → α → β)
@[to_additive additive_of_symmetric_of_isTotal]
lemma multiplicative_of_symmetric_of_isTotal
(hsymm : Symmetric p) (hf_swap : ∀ {a b}, p a b → f a b * f b a = 1)
(hmul : ∀ {a b c}, r a b → r b c → p a b → p b c → p a c → f a c = f a b * f b c)
{a b c : α} (pab : p a b) (pbc : p b c) (pac : p a c) : f a c = f a b * f b c := by
have hmul' : ∀ {b c}, r b c → p a b → p b c → p a c → f a c = f a b * f b c := by
intros b c rbc pab pbc pac
obtain rab | rba := total_of r a b
· exact hmul rab rbc pab pbc pac
rw [← one_mul (f a c), ← hf_swap pab, mul_assoc]
obtain rac | rca := total_of r a c
· rw [hmul rba rac (hsymm pab) pac pbc]
· rw [hmul rbc rca pbc (hsymm pac) (hsymm pab), mul_assoc, hf_swap (hsymm pac), mul_one]
obtain rbc | rcb := total_of r b c
· exact hmul' rbc pab pbc pac
· rw [hmul' rcb pac (hsymm pbc) pab, mul_assoc, hf_swap (hsymm pbc), mul_one]
/-- If a binary function from a type equipped with a total relation `r` to a monoid is
anti-symmetric (i.e. satisfies `f a b * f b a = 1`), in order to show it is multiplicative
(i.e. satisfies `f a c = f a b * f b c`), we may assume `r a b` and `r b c` are satisfied.
We allow restricting to a subset specified by a predicate `p`. -/
@[to_additive additive_of_isTotal "If a binary function from a type equipped with a total relation
`r` to an additive monoid is anti-symmetric (i.e. satisfies `f a b + f b a = 0`), in order to show
it is additive (i.e. satisfies `f a c = f a b + f b c`), we may assume `r a b` and `r b c` are
satisfied. We allow restricting to a subset specified by a predicate `p`."]
theorem multiplicative_of_isTotal (p : α → Prop) (hswap : ∀ {a b}, p a → p b → f a b * f b a = 1)
(hmul : ∀ {a b c}, r a b → r b c → p a → p b → p c → f a c = f a b * f b c) {a b c : α}
(pa : p a) (pb : p b) (pc : p c) : f a c = f a b * f b c := by
apply multiplicative_of_symmetric_of_isTotal (fun a b => p a ∧ p b) r f fun _ _ => And.symm
· simp_rw [and_imp]; exact @hswap
· exact fun rab rbc pab _pbc pac => hmul rab rbc pab.1 pab.2 pac.2
exacts [⟨pa, pb⟩, ⟨pb, pc⟩, ⟨pa, pc⟩]
end multiplicative
/-- An auxiliary lemma that can be used to prove `⇑(f ^ n) = ⇑f^[n]`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma hom_coe_pow {F : Type*} [Monoid F] (c : F → M → M) (h1 : c 1 = id)
(hmul : ∀ f g, c (f * g) = c f ∘ c g) (f : F) : ∀ n, c (f ^ n) = (c f)^[n]
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero, h1]
rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, iterate_succ, hmul, hom_coe_pow c h1 hmul f n]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 1,209 | 1,210 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Union
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# The powerset of a finset
-/
namespace Finset
open Function Multiset
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Finset α}
/-! ### powerset -/
section Powerset
/-- When `s` is a finset, `s.powerset` is the finset of all subsets of `s` (seen as finsets). -/
def powerset (s : Finset α) : Finset (Finset α) :=
⟨(s.1.powerset.pmap Finset.mk) fun _t h => nodup_of_le (mem_powerset.1 h) s.nodup,
s.nodup.powerset.pmap fun _a _ha _b _hb => congr_arg Finset.val⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {s t : Finset α} : s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
cases s
simp [powerset, mem_mk, mem_pmap, mk.injEq, mem_powerset, exists_prop, exists_eq_right,
← val_le_iff]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_powerset (s : Finset α) :
(s.powerset : Set (Finset α)) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) ⁻¹' (s : Set α).powerset := by
ext
simp
theorem empty_mem_powerset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∈ powerset s := by simp
theorem mem_powerset_self (s : Finset α) : s ∈ powerset s := by simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem powerset_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s.powerset.Nonempty :=
⟨∅, empty_mem_powerset _⟩
@[simp]
theorem powerset_mono {s t : Finset α} : powerset s ⊆ powerset t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => mem_powerset.1 <| h <| mem_powerset_self _, fun st _u h =>
mem_powerset.2 <| Subset.trans (mem_powerset.1 h) st⟩
theorem powerset_injective : Injective (powerset : Finset α → Finset (Finset α)) :=
(injective_of_le_imp_le _) powerset_mono.1
@[simp]
theorem powerset_inj : powerset s = powerset t ↔ s = t :=
powerset_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_empty : (∅ : Finset α).powerset = {∅} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powerset_eq_singleton_empty : s.powerset = {∅} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← powerset_empty, powerset_inj]
/-- **Number of Subsets of a Set** -/
@[simp]
theorem card_powerset (s : Finset α) : card (powerset s) = 2 ^ card s :=
(card_pmap _ _ _).trans (Multiset.card_powerset s.1)
theorem not_mem_of_mem_powerset_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {a : α} (ht : t ∈ s.powerset)
(h : a ∉ s) : a ∉ t := by
apply mt _ h
apply mem_powerset.1 ht
theorem powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
powerset (insert a s) = s.powerset ∪ s.powerset.image (insert a) := by
ext t
simp only [exists_prop, mem_powerset, mem_image, mem_union, subset_insert_iff]
by_cases h : a ∈ t
· constructor
· exact fun H => Or.inr ⟨_, H, insert_erase h⟩
· intro H
rcases H with H | H
· exact Subset.trans (erase_subset a t) H
· rcases H with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [← hu.2]
exact Subset.trans (erase_insert_subset a u) hu.1
· have : ¬∃ u : Finset α, u ⊆ s ∧ insert a u = t := by simp [Ne.symm (ne_insert_of_not_mem _ _ h)]
simp [Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem h, this]
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_pair_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) :
(s.powerset : Set (Finset α)).PairwiseDisjoint fun t ↦ ({t, insert a t} : Set (Finset α)) := by
simp_rw [Set.pairwiseDisjoint_iff, mem_coe, mem_powerset]
rintro i hi j hj
simp only [Set.Nonempty, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
exists_eq_or_imp, exists_eq_left, or_imp, imp_self, true_and]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn (not_mem_mono hi ha) (not_mem_mono hj ha)⟩ <;>
rintro rfl <;>
cases Finset.not_mem_mono ‹_› ha (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
/-- For predicate `p` decidable on subsets, it is decidable whether `p` holds for any subset. -/
instance decidableExistsOfDecidableSubsets {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ t ⊆ s, Prop}
[∀ (t) (h : t ⊆ s), Decidable (p t h)] : Decidable (∃ (t : _) (h : t ⊆ s), p t h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ (t : _) (hs : t ∈ s.powerset), p t (mem_powerset.1 hs))
⟨fun ⟨t, _, hp⟩ => ⟨t, _, hp⟩, fun ⟨t, hs, hp⟩ => ⟨t, mem_powerset.2 hs, hp⟩⟩
/-- For predicate `p` decidable on subsets, it is decidable whether `p` holds for every subset. -/
instance decidableForallOfDecidableSubsets {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ t ⊆ s, Prop}
[∀ (t) (h : t ⊆ s), Decidable (p t h)] : Decidable (∀ (t) (h : t ⊆ s), p t h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ (t) (h : t ∈ s.powerset), p t (mem_powerset.1 h))
⟨fun h t hs => h t (mem_powerset.2 hs), fun h _ _ => h _ _⟩
/-- For predicate `p` decidable on subsets, it is decidable whether `p` holds for any subset. -/
instance decidableExistsOfDecidableSubsets' {s : Finset α} {p : Finset α → Prop}
[∀ t, Decidable (p t)] : Decidable (∃ t ⊆ s, p t) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ (t : _) (_h : t ⊆ s), p t) <| by simp
/-- For predicate `p` decidable on subsets, it is decidable whether `p` holds for every subset. -/
instance decidableForallOfDecidableSubsets' {s : Finset α} {p : Finset α → Prop}
[∀ t, Decidable (p t)] : Decidable (∀ t ⊆ s, p t) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ (t : _) (_h : t ⊆ s), p t) <| by simp
end Powerset
section SSubsets
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- For `s` a finset, `s.ssubsets` is the finset comprising strict subsets of `s`. -/
def ssubsets (s : Finset α) : Finset (Finset α) :=
erase (powerset s) s
@[simp]
theorem mem_ssubsets {s t : Finset α} : t ∈ s.ssubsets ↔ t ⊂ s := by
rw [ssubsets, mem_erase, mem_powerset, ssubset_iff_subset_ne, and_comm]
theorem empty_mem_ssubsets {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∅ ∈ s.ssubsets := by
rw [mem_ssubsets, ssubset_iff_subset_ne]
exact ⟨empty_subset s, h.ne_empty.symm⟩
/-- For predicate `p` decidable on ssubsets, it is decidable whether `p` holds for any ssubset. -/
def decidableExistsOfDecidableSSubsets {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ t ⊂ s, Prop}
[∀ t h, Decidable (p t h)] : Decidable (∃ t h, p t h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∃ (t : _) (hs : t ∈ s.ssubsets), p t (mem_ssubsets.1 hs))
⟨fun ⟨t, _, hp⟩ => ⟨t, _, hp⟩, fun ⟨t, hs, hp⟩ => ⟨t, mem_ssubsets.2 hs, hp⟩⟩
/-- For predicate `p` decidable on ssubsets, it is decidable whether `p` holds for every ssubset. -/
def decidableForallOfDecidableSSubsets {s : Finset α} {p : ∀ t ⊂ s, Prop}
[∀ t h, Decidable (p t h)] : Decidable (∀ t h, p t h) :=
decidable_of_iff (∀ (t) (h : t ∈ s.ssubsets), p t (mem_ssubsets.1 h))
⟨fun h t hs => h t (mem_ssubsets.2 hs), fun h _ _ => h _ _⟩
/-- A version of `Finset.decidableExistsOfDecidableSSubsets` with a non-dependent `p`.
Typeclass inference cannot find `hu` here, so this is not an instance. -/
def decidableExistsOfDecidableSSubsets' {s : Finset α} {p : Finset α → Prop}
(hu : ∀ t ⊂ s, Decidable (p t)) : Decidable (∃ (t : _) (_h : t ⊂ s), p t) :=
@Finset.decidableExistsOfDecidableSSubsets _ _ _ _ hu
/-- A version of `Finset.decidableForallOfDecidableSSubsets` with a non-dependent `p`.
Typeclass inference cannot find `hu` here, so this is not an instance. -/
def decidableForallOfDecidableSSubsets' {s : Finset α} {p : Finset α → Prop}
(hu : ∀ t ⊂ s, Decidable (p t)) : Decidable (∀ t ⊂ s, p t) :=
@Finset.decidableForallOfDecidableSSubsets _ _ _ _ hu
end SSubsets
section powersetCard
variable {n} {s t : Finset α}
/-- Given an integer `n` and a finset `s`, then `powersetCard n s` is the finset of subsets of `s`
of cardinality `n`. -/
def powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) : Finset (Finset α) :=
⟨((s.1.powersetCard n).pmap Finset.mk) fun _t h => nodup_of_le (mem_powersetCard.1 h).1 s.2,
s.2.powersetCard.pmap fun _a _ha _b _hb => congr_arg Finset.val⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_powersetCard : s ∈ powersetCard n t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ card s = n := by
cases s; simp [powersetCard, val_le_iff.symm]
@[simp]
theorem powersetCard_mono {n} {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : powersetCard n s ⊆ powersetCard n t :=
fun _u h' => mem_powersetCard.2 <|
And.imp (fun h₂ => Subset.trans h₂ h) id (mem_powersetCard.1 h')
/-- **Formula for the Number of Combinations** -/
@[simp]
theorem card_powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) :
card (powersetCard n s) = Nat.choose (card s) n :=
(card_pmap _ _ _).trans (Multiset.card_powersetCard n s.1)
@[simp]
theorem powersetCard_zero (s : Finset α) : s.powersetCard 0 = {∅} := by
ext; rw [mem_powersetCard, mem_singleton, card_eq_zero]
refine
⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => by
rw [h]
exact ⟨empty_subset s, rfl⟩⟩
lemma powersetCard_empty_subsingleton (n : ℕ) :
(powersetCard n (∅ : Finset α) : Set <| Finset α).Subsingleton := by
simp [Set.Subsingleton, subset_empty]
@[simp]
theorem map_val_val_powersetCard (s : Finset α) (i : ℕ) :
(s.powersetCard i).val.map Finset.val = s.1.powersetCard i := by
simp [Finset.powersetCard, map_pmap, pmap_eq_map, map_id']
theorem powersetCard_one (s : Finset α) :
s.powersetCard 1 = s.map ⟨_, Finset.singleton_injective⟩ :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_injective val_injective <| by simp [Multiset.powersetCard_one]
@[simp]
lemma powersetCard_eq_empty : powersetCard n s = ∅ ↔ s.card < n := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ card_eq_zero.1 <| by rw [card_powersetCard, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]⟩
contrapose!
exact fun h ↦ nonempty_iff_ne_empty.1 <| (exists_subset_card_eq h).imp <| by simp
@[simp] lemma powersetCard_card_add (s : Finset α) (hn : 0 < n) :
s.powersetCard (s.card + n) = ∅ := by simpa
theorem powersetCard_eq_filter {n} {s : Finset α} :
powersetCard n s = (powerset s).filter fun x => x.card = n := by
ext
simp [mem_powersetCard]
theorem powersetCard_succ_insert [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (h : x ∉ s) (n : ℕ) :
powersetCard n.succ (insert x s) =
| powersetCard n.succ s ∪ (powersetCard n s).image (insert x) := by
rw [powersetCard_eq_filter, powerset_insert, filter_union, ← powersetCard_eq_filter]
congr
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Powerset.lean | 234 | 236 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic with cardinals
This file collects results about the cardinality of different ordinal operations.
-/
universe u v
open Cardinal Ordinal Set
/-! ### Cardinal operations with ordinal indices -/
namespace Cardinal
/-- Bounds the cardinal of an ordinal-indexed union of sets. -/
lemma mk_iUnion_Ordinal_lift_le_of_le {β : Type v} {o : Ordinal.{u}} {c : Cardinal.{v}}
(ho : lift.{v} o.card ≤ lift.{u} c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (A : Ordinal → Set β)
(hA : ∀ j < o, #(A j) ≤ c) : #(⋃ j < o, A j) ≤ c := by
simp_rw [← mem_Iio, biUnion_eq_iUnion, iUnion, iSup, ← o.enumIsoToType.symm.surjective.range_comp]
rw [← lift_le.{u}]
apply ((mk_iUnion_le_lift _).trans _).trans_eq (mul_eq_self (aleph0_le_lift.2 hc))
rw [mk_toType]
refine mul_le_mul' ho (ciSup_le' ?_)
intro i
simpa using hA _ (o.enumIsoToType.symm i).2
lemma mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le {β : Type*} {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal}
(ho : o.card ≤ c) (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) (A : Ordinal → Set β)
(hA : ∀ j < o, #(A j) ≤ c) : #(⋃ j < o, A j) ≤ c := by
apply mk_iUnion_Ordinal_lift_le_of_le _ hc A hA
rwa [Cardinal.lift_le]
end Cardinal
@[deprecated mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le (since := "2024-11-02")]
alias Ordinal.Cardinal.mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le := mk_iUnion_Ordinal_le_of_le
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
theorem lift_card_iSup_le_sum_card {ι : Type u} [Small.{v} ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{v}) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (⨆ i, f i).card ≤ Cardinal.sum fun i ↦ (f i).card := by
simp_rw [← mk_toType]
rw [← mk_sigma, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v} #(Σ _, _), ← Cardinal.lift_umax.{v, u}]
apply lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective (f := enumIsoToType _ ∘ (⟨(enumIsoToType _).symm ·.2,
(mem_Iio.mp ((enumIsoToType _).symm _).2).trans_le (Ordinal.le_iSup _ _)⟩))
rw [EquivLike.comp_surjective]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Ordinal.lt_iSup_iff.mp hx
exact ⟨⟨i, enumIsoToType _ ⟨x, hi⟩⟩, by simp⟩
theorem card_iSup_le_sum_card {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ i, f i).card ≤ Cardinal.sum (fun i ↦ (f i).card) := by
have := lift_card_iSup_le_sum_card f
rwa [Cardinal.lift_id'] at this
theorem card_iSup_Iio_le_sum_card {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : Iio o → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ a : Iio o, f a).card ≤ Cardinal.sum fun i ↦ (f ((enumIsoToType o).symm i)).card := by
apply le_of_eq_of_le (congr_arg _ _).symm (card_iSup_le_sum_card _)
simpa using (enumIsoToType o).symm.iSup_comp (g := fun x ↦ f x)
theorem card_iSup_Iio_le_card_mul_iSup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : Iio o → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(⨆ a : Iio o, f a).card ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} o.card * ⨆ a : Iio o, (f a).card := by
apply (card_iSup_Iio_le_sum_card f).trans
convert ← sum_le_iSup_lift _
· exact mk_toType o
· exact (enumIsoToType o).symm.iSup_comp (g := fun x ↦ (f x).card)
theorem card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left {a : Ordinal} (ha : ω ≤ a) (b : Ordinal) :
(a ^ b).card ≤ max a.card b.card := by
refine limitRecOn b ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa using one_lt_omega0.le.trans ha
· intro b IH
rw [opow_succ, card_mul, card_succ, Cardinal.mul_eq_max_of_aleph0_le_right, max_comm]
· apply (max_le_max_left _ IH).trans
rw [← max_assoc, max_self]
exact max_le_max_left _ le_self_add
· rw [ne_eq, card_eq_zero, opow_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨rfl, -⟩
cases omega0_pos.not_le ha
· rwa [aleph0_le_card]
· intro b hb IH
rw [(isNormal_opow (one_lt_omega0.trans_le ha)).apply_of_isLimit hb]
apply (card_iSup_Iio_le_card_mul_iSup _).trans
rw [Cardinal.lift_id, Cardinal.mul_eq_max_of_aleph0_le_right, max_comm]
· apply max_le _ (le_max_right _ _)
apply ciSup_le'
intro c
exact (IH c.1 c.2).trans (max_le_max_left _ (card_le_card c.2.le))
· simpa using hb.pos.ne'
· refine le_ciSup_of_le ?_ ⟨1, one_lt_omega0.trans_le <| omega0_le_of_isLimit hb⟩ ?_
· exact Cardinal.bddAbove_of_small _
· simpa
theorem card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : ω ≤ b) :
(a ^ b).card ≤ max a.card b.card := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ | ha := eq_nat_or_omega0_le a
· apply (card_le_card <| opow_le_opow_left b (nat_lt_omega0 n).le).trans
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left le_rfl _).trans
simp [hb]
· exact card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha b
theorem card_opow_le (a b : Ordinal) : (a ^ b).card ≤ max ℵ₀ (max a.card b.card) := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ | ha := eq_nat_or_omega0_le a
· obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ | hb := eq_nat_or_omega0_le b
· rw [← natCast_opow, card_nat]
exact le_max_of_le_left (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le
· exact (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right _ hb).trans (le_max_right _ _)
· exact (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha _).trans (le_max_right _ _)
theorem card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (ha : ω ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) :
(a ^ b).card = max a.card b.card := by
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_left ha b).antisymm (max_le _ _) <;> apply card_le_card
· exact left_le_opow a hb
· exact right_le_opow b (one_lt_omega0.trans_le ha)
theorem card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_right {a b : Ordinal} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : ω ≤ b) :
(a ^ b).card = max a.card b.card := by
apply (card_opow_le_of_omega0_le_right a hb).antisymm (max_le _ _) <;> apply card_le_card
· exact left_le_opow a (omega0_pos.trans_le hb)
· exact right_le_opow b ha
theorem card_omega0_opow {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : card (ω ^ a) = max ℵ₀ a.card := by
rw [card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_left le_rfl h.bot_lt, card_omega0]
theorem card_opow_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : card (a ^ ω) = max ℵ₀ a.card := by
rw [card_opow_eq_of_omega0_le_right h le_rfl, card_omega0, max_comm]
theorem principal_opow_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· ^ ·) (ω_ o) := by
obtain rfl | ho := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos o
· rw [omega_zero]
exact principal_opow_omega0
· intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_omega_iff_card_lt] at ha hb ⊢
apply (card_opow_le a b).trans_lt (max_lt _ (max_lt ha hb))
rwa [← aleph_zero, aleph_lt_aleph]
theorem IsInitial.principal_opow {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· ^ ·) o := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := mem_range_omega_iff.2 ⟨ho, h⟩
exact principal_opow_omega a
theorem principal_opow_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· ^ ·) c.ord := by
apply (isInitial_ord c).principal_opow
rwa [omega0_le_ord]
/-! ### Initial ordinals are principal -/
theorem principal_add_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· + ·) c.ord := by
intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_ord, card_add] at *
exact add_lt_of_lt hc ha hb
theorem IsInitial.principal_add {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· + ·) o := by
rw [← h.ord_card]
apply principal_add_ord
rwa [aleph0_le_card]
theorem principal_add_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· + ·) (ω_ o) :=
(isInitial_omega o).principal_add (omega0_le_omega o)
theorem principal_mul_ord {c : Cardinal} (hc : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : Principal (· * ·) c.ord := by
intro a b ha hb
rw [lt_ord, card_mul] at *
exact mul_lt_of_lt hc ha hb
theorem IsInitial.principal_mul {o : Ordinal} (h : IsInitial o) (ho : ω ≤ o) :
Principal (· * ·) o := by
rw [← h.ord_card]
apply principal_mul_ord
rwa [aleph0_le_card]
theorem principal_mul_omega (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· * ·) (ω_ o) :=
(isInitial_omega o).principal_mul (omega0_le_omega o)
@[deprecated principal_add_omega (since := "2024-11-08")]
theorem _root_.Cardinal.principal_add_aleph (o : Ordinal) : Principal (· + ·) (ℵ_ o).ord :=
principal_add_ord <| aleph0_le_aleph o
end Ordinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean | 1,241 | 1,241 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
| @[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 898 | 898 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.CDF
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
/-! # Gamma distributions over ℝ
Define the gamma measure over the reals.
## Main definitions
* `gammaPDFReal`: the function `a r x ↦ r ^ a / (Gamma a) * x ^ (a-1) * exp (-(r * x))`
for `0 ≤ x` or `0` else, which is the probability density function of a gamma distribution with
shape `a` and rate `r` (when `ha : 0 < a ` and `hr : 0 < r`).
* `gammaPDF`: `ℝ≥0∞`-valued pdf,
`gammaPDF a r = ENNReal.ofReal (gammaPDFReal a r)`.
* `gammaMeasure`: a gamma measure on `ℝ`, parametrized by its shape `a` and rate `r`.
* `gammaCDFReal`: the CDF given by the definition of CDF in `ProbabilityTheory.CDF` applied to the
gamma measure.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory Real Set Filter Topology
/-- A Lebesgue Integral from -∞ to y can be expressed as the sum of one from -∞ to 0 and 0 to x -/
lemma lintegral_Iic_eq_lintegral_Iio_add_Icc {y z : ℝ} (f : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞) (hzy : z ≤ y) :
∫⁻ x in Iic y, f x = (∫⁻ x in Iio z, f x) + ∫⁻ x in Icc z y, f x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Icc_eq_Iic hzy, lintegral_union measurableSet_Icc]
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne, mem_Iio, mem_Icc]
intros
linarith
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section GammaPDF
/-- The pdf of the gamma distribution depending on its scale and rate -/
noncomputable
def gammaPDFReal (a r x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x then r ^ a / (Gamma a) * x ^ (a-1) * exp (-(r * x)) else 0
/-- The pdf of the gamma distribution, as a function valued in `ℝ≥0∞` -/
noncomputable
def gammaPDF (a r x : ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
ENNReal.ofReal (gammaPDFReal a r x)
lemma gammaPDF_eq (a r x : ℝ) :
gammaPDF a r x =
ENNReal.ofReal (if 0 ≤ x then r ^ a / (Gamma a) * x ^ (a-1) * exp (-(r * x)) else 0) :=
rfl
|
lemma gammaPDF_of_neg {a r x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : gammaPDF a r x = 0 := by
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Gamma.lean | 55 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 2,034 | 2,037 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Circulant matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about circulant matrices.
Given a vector `v : n → α` indexed by a type that is endowed with subtraction,
`Matrix.circulant v` is the matrix whose `(i, j)`th entry is `v (i - j)`.
## Main results
- `Matrix.circulant`: the circulant matrix generated by a given vector `v : n → α`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul`: the product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul_comm`: multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do.
## Implementation notes
`Matrix.Fin.foo` is the `Fin n` version of `Matrix.foo`.
Namely, the index type of the circulant matrices in discussion is `Fin n`.
## Tags
circulant, matrix
-/
variable {α β n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Function
open Matrix
/-- Given the condition `[Sub n]` and a vector `v : n → α`,
we define `circulant v` to be the circulant matrix generated by `v` of type `Matrix n n α`.
The `(i,j)`th entry is defined to be `v (i - j)`. -/
def circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => v (i - j)
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `circulant`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem circulant_apply [Sub n] (v : n → α) (i j) : circulant v i j = v (i - j) := rfl
theorem circulant_col_zero_eq [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) (i : n) : circulant v i 0 = v i :=
congr_arg v (sub_zero _)
theorem circulant_injective [SubtractionMonoid n] :
Injective (circulant : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) := by
intro v w h
ext k
rw [← circulant_col_zero_eq v, ← circulant_col_zero_eq w, h]
theorem Fin.circulant_injective : ∀ n, Injective fun v : Fin n → α => circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_injective
@[simp]
theorem circulant_inj [SubtractionMonoid n] {v w : n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
circulant_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Fin.circulant_inj {n} {v w : Fin n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
(Fin.circulant_injective n).eq_iff
theorem transpose_circulant [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i) := by ext; simp
theorem conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i)) := by ext; simp
theorem Fin.transpose_circulant : ∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.transpose_circulant
theorem Fin.conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] :
∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i))
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.conjTranspose_circulant
theorem map_circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) (f : α → β) :
(circulant v).map f = circulant fun i => f (v i) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_neg [Neg α] [Sub n] (v : n → α) : circulant (-v) = -circulant v :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem circulant_zero (α n) [Zero α] [Sub n] : circulant 0 = (0 : Matrix n n α) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_add [Add α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v + w) = circulant v + circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_sub [Sub α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v - w) = circulant v - circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`. -/
theorem circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [Fintype n] [AddGroup n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w) := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, mulVec, circulant_apply, dotProduct]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.subRight j) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.subRight_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Fin.circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul
/-- Multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do. -/
theorem circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] [Fintype n] [AddCommGroup n]
(v w : n → α) : circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, circulant_apply, mul_comm]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv ((Equiv.subLeft i).trans (Equiv.addRight j)) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.subLeft_apply, Equiv.coe_addRight, add_sub_cancel_right,
mul_comm]
congr 2
abel
theorem Fin.circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul_comm
/-- `k • circulant v` is another circulant matrix `circulant (k • v)`. -/
theorem circulant_smul [Sub n] [SMul R α] (k : R) (v : n → α) :
circulant (k • v) = k • circulant v := rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem circulant_single_one (α n) [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq n] [AddGroup n] :
circulant (Pi.single 0 1 : n → α) = (1 : Matrix n n α) := by
ext i j
simp [one_apply, Pi.single_apply, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem circulant_single (n) [Semiring α] [DecidableEq n] [AddGroup n] [Fintype n] (a : α) :
circulant (Pi.single 0 a : n → α) = scalar n a := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Circulant.lean | 143 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
| theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 474 | 474 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
theorem map_pure_prod (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (B : Filter β) :
map (Function.uncurry f) (pure a ×ˢ B) = map (f a) B := by
rw [Filter.pure_prod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_pure {b : β} : f ×ˢ pure b = map (fun a => (a, b)) f := by
rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} :
(pure a : Filter α) ×ˢ (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a, b) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_bot : f ×ˢ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_prod_iff, subset_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff, ← exists_prop,
Subtype.exists', exists_or, exists_const, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem prod_bot : f ×ˢ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inr rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_prod : (⊥ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem prod_neBot : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) ↔ NeBot f ∧ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.prod (hf : NeBot f) (hg : NeBot g) : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := prod_neBot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod.instNeBot [hf : NeBot f] [hg : NeBot g] : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := hf.prod hg
@[simp]
| lemma disjoint_prod {f' : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
Disjoint (f ×ˢ g) (f' ×ˢ g') ↔ Disjoint f f' ∨ Disjoint g g' := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod, prod_eq_bot]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 404 | 406 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Basic
/-!
This file defines a few basic properties of groupoids.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Groupoid
variable (C : Type*) [Groupoid C]
section Thin
theorem isThin_iff : Quiver.IsThin C ↔ ∀ c : C, Subsingleton (c ⟶ c) := by
refine ⟨fun h c => h c c, fun h c d => Subsingleton.intro fun f g => ?_⟩
| haveI := h d
calc
f = f ≫ inv g ≫ g := by simp only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = f ≫ inv f ≫ g := by congr 1
simp only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_hom_id, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
_ = g := by simp only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
end Thin
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Groupoid/Basic.lean | 23 | 30 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive closure_prod]
theorem closure_prod {s : Set G} {t : Set N} (hs : 1 ∈ s) (ht : 1 ∈ t) :
closure (s ×ˢ t) = (closure s).prod (closure t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_le _ |>.2 <| Set.prod_subset_prod_iff.2 <| .inl ⟨subset_closure, subset_closure⟩)
(prod_le_iff.2 ⟨
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _x hx => subset_closure ⟨hx, ht⟩,
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| closure_le _ |>.2 fun _y hy => subset_closure ⟨hs, hy⟩⟩)
/-- Product of subgroups is isomorphic to their product as groups. -/
@[to_additive prodEquiv
"Product of additive subgroups is isomorphic to their product
as additive groups"]
def prodEquiv (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : H.prod K ≃* H × K :=
{ Equiv.Set.prod (H : Set G) (K : Set N) with map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
section Pi
variable {η : Type*} {f : η → Type*}
-- defined here and not in Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations to have access to Algebra.Group.Pi
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for submonoids. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Submonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the submonoid of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `Pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive "A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubmonoid`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubmonoid f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubmonoid` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def _root_.Submonoid.pi [∀ i, MulOneClass (f i)] (I : Set η) (s : ∀ i, Submonoid (f i)) :
Submonoid (∀ i, f i) where
carrier := I.pi fun i => (s i).carrier
one_mem' i _ := (s i).one_mem
mul_mem' hp hq i hI := (s i).mul_mem (hp i hI) (hq i hI)
variable [∀ i, Group (f i)]
/-- A version of `Set.pi` for subgroups. Given an index set `I` and a family of submodules
`s : Π i, Subgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the subgroup of dependent functions `f : Π i, f i` such that
`f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Set.pi` for `AddSubgroup`s. Given an index set `I` and a family
of submodules `s : Π i, AddSubgroup f i`, `pi I s` is the `AddSubgroup` of dependent functions
`f : Π i, f i` such that `f i` belongs to `pi I s` whenever `i ∈ I`."]
def pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : Subgroup (∀ i, f i) :=
{ Submonoid.pi I fun i => (H i).toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hp i hI => (H i).inv_mem (hp i hI) }
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_pi (I : Set η) (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) :
(pi I H : Set (∀ i, f i)) = Set.pi I fun i => (H i : Set (f i)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_pi (I : Set η) {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {p : ∀ i, f i} :
p ∈ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → p i ∈ H i :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_top (I : Set η) : (pi I fun i => (⊤ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_empty (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi ∅ H = ⊤ :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_pi]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_bot : (pi Set.univ fun i => (⊥ : Subgroup (f i))) = ⊥ :=
(eq_bot_iff_forall _).mpr fun p hp => by
simp only [mem_pi, mem_bot] at *
ext j
exact hp j trivial
@[to_additive]
theorem le_pi_iff {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} {J : Subgroup (∀ i, f i)} :
J ≤ pi I H ↔ ∀ i : η, i ∈ I → map (Pi.evalMonoidHom f i) J ≤ H i := by
constructor
· intro h i hi
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact (h hx) _ hi
· intro h x hx i hi
exact h i hi ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSingle_mem_pi [DecidableEq η] {I : Set η} {H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)} (i : η) (x : f i) :
Pi.mulSingle i x ∈ pi I H ↔ i ∈ I → x ∈ H i := by
constructor
· intro h hi
simpa using h i hi
· intro h j hj
by_cases heq : j = i
· subst heq
simpa using h hj
· simp [heq, one_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem pi_eq_bot_iff (H : ∀ i, Subgroup (f i)) : pi Set.univ H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ i, H i = ⊥ := by
classical
simp only [eq_bot_iff_forall]
constructor
· intro h i x hx
have : MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x = 1 :=
h (MonoidHom.mulSingle f i x) ((mulSingle_mem_pi i x).mpr fun _ => hx)
simpa using congr_fun this i
· exact fun h x hx => funext fun i => h _ _ (hx i trivial)
end Pi
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
variable (H)
/-- A subgroup is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (MulAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end Subgroup
namespace AddSubgroup
variable (H : AddSubgroup A)
/-- An `AddSubgroup` is characteristic if it is fixed by all automorphisms.
Several equivalent conditions are provided by lemmas of the form `Characteristic.iff...` -/
structure Characteristic : Prop where
/-- `H` is fixed by all automorphisms -/
fixed : ∀ ϕ : A ≃+ A, H.comap ϕ.toAddMonoidHom = H
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup.Characteristic
attribute [class] Characteristic
instance (priority := 100) normal_of_characteristic [h : H.Characteristic] : H.Normal :=
⟨fun a ha b => (SetLike.ext_iff.mp (h.fixed (AddAut.conj b)) a).mpr ha⟩
end AddSubgroup
namespace Subgroup
variable {H K : Subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom = H :=
⟨Characteristic.fixed, Characteristic.mk⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_comap_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => le_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (h ϕ) fun g hg => h ϕ.symm ((congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mpr hg)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_comap : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.comap ϕ.toMonoidHom :=
characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans
⟨fun h ϕ => ge_of_eq (h ϕ), fun h ϕ =>
le_antisymm (fun g hg => (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (ϕ.symm_apply_apply g)).mp (h ϕ.symm hg)) (h ϕ)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_eq : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom = H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_eq.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_map_le : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom ≤ H := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_comap_le.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem characteristic_iff_le_map : H.Characteristic ↔ ∀ ϕ : G ≃* G, H ≤ H.map ϕ.toMonoidHom := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_eq_comap_symm']
exact characteristic_iff_le_comap.trans ⟨fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm, fun h ϕ => h ϕ.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance botCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_le_map.mpr fun _ϕ => bot_le
@[to_additive]
instance topCharacteristic : Characteristic (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
characteristic_iff_map_le.mpr fun _ϕ => le_top
variable (H)
section Normalizer
variable {H}
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top_iff : H.normalizer = ⊤ ↔ H.Normal :=
eq_top_iff.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a ha b => (h (mem_top b) a).mp ha⟩, fun h a _ha b =>
⟨fun hb => h.conj_mem b hb a, fun hb => by rwa [h.mem_comm_iff, inv_mul_cancel_left] at hb⟩⟩
variable (H) in
@[to_additive]
theorem normalizer_eq_top [h : H.Normal] : H.normalizer = ⊤ :=
normalizer_eq_top_iff.mpr h
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage. -/
@[to_additive "The preimage of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the preimage."]
theorem le_normalizer_comap (f : N →* G) :
H.normalizer.comap f ≤ (H.comap f).normalizer := fun x => by
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_comap]
intro h n
simp [h (f n)]
/-- The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image. -/
@[to_additive "The image of the normalizer is contained in the normalizer of the image."]
theorem le_normalizer_map (f : G →* N) : H.normalizer.map f ≤ (H.map f).normalizer := fun _ => by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, mem_map, exists_imp, mem_normalizer_iff]
rintro x hx rfl n
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
use x * y * x⁻¹, (hx y).1 hy
simp
· rintro ⟨y, hyH, hy⟩
use x⁻¹ * y * x
rw [hx]
simp [hy, hyH, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range {f : N →* G} (h : H ≤ f.range) :
comap f H.normalizer = (comap f H).normalizer := by
apply le_antisymm (le_normalizer_comap f)
rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap]
apply (le_normalizer_map f).trans
rw [map_comap_eq_self h]
@[to_additive]
theorem subgroupOf_normalizer_eq {H N : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ N) :
H.normalizer.subgroupOf N = (H.subgroupOf N).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range (h.trans_eq N.range_subtype.symm)
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer (h : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ H.normalizer := by
rw [← subgroupOf_eq_top, subgroupOf_normalizer_eq h, normalizer_eq_top_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ K ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
inf_subgroupOf_right H K ▸ normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer inf_le_right
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_in_normalizer : (H.subgroupOf H.normalizer).Normal :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer H.le_normalizer).mpr le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal_subgroupOf [hK : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal] (HK : H ≤ K) :
K ≤ H.normalizer :=
(normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer HK).mp hK
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_normalizer_of_normal {S : Set G} [hH : H.Normal] : S ⊆ H.normalizer :=
(@normalizer_eq_top _ _ H hH) ▸ le_top
@[to_additive]
theorem le_normalizer_of_normal [H.Normal] : K ≤ H.normalizer := subset_normalizer_of_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf : H.normalizer ⊓ K.normalizer ≤ (H ⊓ K).normalizer :=
fun _ h g ↦ and_congr (h.1 g) (h.2 g)
variable (G) in
/-- Every proper subgroup `H` of `G` is a proper normal subgroup of the normalizer of `H` in `G`. -/
def _root_.NormalizerCondition :=
∀ H : Subgroup G, H < ⊤ → H < normalizer H
/-- Alternative phrasing of the normalizer condition: Only the full group is self-normalizing.
This may be easier to work with, as it avoids inequalities and negations. -/
theorem _root_.normalizerCondition_iff_only_full_group_self_normalizing :
NormalizerCondition G ↔ ∀ H : Subgroup G, H.normalizer = H → H = ⊤ := by
apply forall_congr'; intro H
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_normalizer, le_top, Ne]
tauto
variable (H)
end Normalizer
end Subgroup
namespace Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- Given a set `s`, `conjugatesOfSet s` is the set of all conjugates of
the elements of `s`. -/
def conjugatesOfSet (s : Set G) : Set G :=
⋃ a ∈ s, conjugatesOf a
theorem mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff {x : G} : x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, IsConj a x := by
rw [conjugatesOfSet, Set.mem_iUnion₂]
simp only [conjugatesOf, isConj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, exists_prop]
theorem subset_conjugatesOfSet : s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet s := fun (x : G) (h : x ∈ s) =>
mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨x, h, IsConj.refl _⟩
theorem conjugatesOfSet_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ conjugatesOfSet t :=
Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h
theorem conjugates_subset_normal {N : Subgroup G} [tn : N.Normal] {a : G} (h : a ∈ N) :
conjugatesOf a ⊆ N := by
rintro a hc
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
exact tn.conj_mem a h c
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset {s : Set G} {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) :
conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ N :=
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _x H => conjugates_subset_normal (h H)
/-- The set of conjugates of `s` is closed under conjugation. -/
theorem conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet {x c : G} :
x ∈ conjugatesOfSet s → c * x * c⁻¹ ∈ conjugatesOfSet s := fun H => by
rcases mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.1 H with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact mem_conjugatesOfSet_iff.2 ⟨a, h₁, h₂.trans (isConj_iff.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩)⟩
end Group
namespace Subgroup
open Group
variable {s : Set G}
/-- The normal closure of a set `s` is the subgroup closure of all the conjugates of
elements of `s`. It is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
def normalClosure (s : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
closure (conjugatesOfSet s)
theorem conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure : conjugatesOfSet s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
subset_closure
theorem subset_normalClosure : s ⊆ normalClosure s :=
Set.Subset.trans subset_conjugatesOfSet conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure
theorem le_normalClosure {H : Subgroup G} : H ≤ normalClosure ↑H := fun _ h =>
subset_normalClosure h
/-- The normal closure of `s` is a normal subgroup. -/
instance normalClosure_normal : (normalClosure s).Normal :=
⟨fun n h g => by
refine Subgroup.closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_)
(fun x _ ihx => ?_) h
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset_normalClosure (conj_mem_conjugatesOfSet hx)
· simpa using (normalClosure s).one_mem
· rw [← conj_mul]
exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· rw [← conj_inv]
exact inv_mem ihx⟩
/-- The normal closure of `s` is the smallest normal subgroup containing `s`. -/
theorem normalClosure_le_normal {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] (h : s ⊆ N) : normalClosure s ≤ N := by
intro a w
refine closure_induction (fun x hx => ?_) ?_ (fun x y _ _ ihx ihy => ?_) (fun x _ ihx => ?_) w
· exact conjugatesOfSet_subset h hx
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem ihx ihy
· exact inv_mem ihx
theorem normalClosure_subset_iff {N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] : s ⊆ N ↔ normalClosure s ≤ N :=
⟨normalClosure_le_normal, Set.Subset.trans subset_normalClosure⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem normalClosure_mono {s t : Set G} (h : s ⊆ t) : normalClosure s ≤ normalClosure t :=
normalClosure_le_normal (Set.Subset.trans h subset_normalClosure)
theorem normalClosure_eq_iInf :
normalClosure s = ⨅ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : s ⊆ N), N :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_iInf normalClosure_le_normal)
(iInf_le_of_le (normalClosure s)
(iInf_le_of_le (by infer_instance) (iInf_le_of_le subset_normalClosure le_rfl)))
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : normalClosure ↑H = H :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal rfl.subset) le_normalClosure
theorem normalClosure_idempotent : normalClosure ↑(normalClosure s) = normalClosure s :=
normalClosure_eq_self _
theorem closure_le_normalClosure {s : Set G} : closure s ≤ normalClosure s := by
simp only [subset_normalClosure, closure_le]
@[simp]
theorem normalClosure_closure_eq_normalClosure {s : Set G} :
normalClosure ↑(closure s) = normalClosure s :=
le_antisymm (normalClosure_le_normal closure_le_normalClosure) (normalClosure_mono subset_closure)
/-- The normal core of a subgroup `H` is the largest normal subgroup of `G` contained in `H`,
as shown by `Subgroup.normalCore_eq_iSup`. -/
def normalCore (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G where
carrier := { a : G | ∀ b : G, b * a * b⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' a := by rw [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel]; exact H.one_mem
inv_mem' {_} h b := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_inv).mp (H.inv_mem (h b))
mul_mem' {_ _} ha hb c := (congr_arg (· ∈ H) conj_mul).mp (H.mul_mem (ha c) (hb c))
theorem normalCore_le (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore ≤ H := fun a h => by
rw [← mul_one a, ← inv_one, ← one_mul a]
exact h 1
instance normalCore_normal (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.Normal :=
⟨fun a h b c => by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]; exact h (c * b)⟩
theorem normal_le_normalCore {H : Subgroup G} {N : Subgroup G} [hN : N.Normal] :
N ≤ H.normalCore ↔ N ≤ H :=
⟨ge_trans H.normalCore_le, fun h_le n hn g => h_le (hN.conj_mem n hn g)⟩
theorem normalCore_mono {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H.normalCore ≤ K.normalCore :=
normal_le_normalCore.mpr (H.normalCore_le.trans h)
theorem normalCore_eq_iSup (H : Subgroup G) :
H.normalCore = ⨆ (N : Subgroup G) (_ : Normal N) (_ : N ≤ H), N :=
le_antisymm
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore
(le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_normal (le_iSup_of_le H.normalCore_le le_rfl)))
(iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le normal_le_normalCore.mpr)
@[simp]
theorem normalCore_eq_self (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : H.normalCore = H :=
le_antisymm H.normalCore_le (normal_le_normalCore.mpr le_rfl)
theorem normalCore_idempotent (H : Subgroup G) : H.normalCore.normalCore = H.normalCore :=
H.normalCore.normalCore_eq_self
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} {P : Type*} [Group N] [Group P] (K : Subgroup G)
open Subgroup
section Ker
variable {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive prodMap_comap_prod]
theorem prodMap_comap_prod {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N)
(g : G' →* N') (S : Subgroup N) (S' : Subgroup N') :
(S.prod S').comap (prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.sumMap_comap_sum := AddMonoidHom.prodMap_comap_prod
@[to_additive ker_prodMap]
theorem ker_prodMap {G' : Type*} {N' : Type*} [Group G'] [Group N'] (f : G →* N) (g : G' →* N') :
(prodMap f g).ker = f.ker.prod g.ker := by
rw [← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← comap_bot, ← prodMap_comap_prod, bot_prod_bot]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddMonoidHom.ker_sumMap := AddMonoidHom.ker_prodMap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_fst : ker (fst G G') = .prod ⊥ ⊤ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (and_true _)).symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma ker_snd : ker (snd G G') = .prod ⊤ ⊥ := SetLike.ext fun _ => (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm
end Ker
end MonoidHom
namespace Subgroup
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (H : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.map {H : Subgroup G} (h : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.map f).Normal := by
rw [← normalizer_eq_top_iff, ← top_le_iff, ← f.range_eq_top_of_surjective hf, f.range_eq_map,
← H.normalizer_eq_top]
exact le_normalizer_map _
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
open MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] (f : G →* N)
/-- The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of a surjective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the preimage of
a surjective function."]
theorem comap_normalizer_eq_of_surjective (H : Subgroup G) {f : N →* G}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : H.normalizer.comap f = (H.comap f).normalizer :=
comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range fun x _ ↦ hf x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range := comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-13")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_injective_of_le_range :=
AddSubgroup.comap_normalizer_eq_of_le_range
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an isomorphism. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of an
isomorphism."]
theorem map_equiv_normalizer_eq (H : Subgroup G) (f : G ≃* N) :
H.normalizer.map f.toMonoidHom = (H.map f.toMonoidHom).normalizer := by
ext x
simp only [mem_normalizer_iff, mem_map_equiv]
rw [f.toEquiv.forall_congr]
intro
simp
/-- The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of the normalizer is equal to the normalizer of the image of a bijective
function."]
theorem map_normalizer_eq_of_bijective (H : Subgroup G) {f : G →* N} (hf : Function.Bijective f) :
H.normalizer.map f = (H.map f).normalizer :=
map_equiv_normalizer_eq H (MulEquiv.ofBijective f hf)
end Subgroup
namespace MonoidHom
variable {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂] [Group G₃]
variable (f : G₁ →* G₂) (f_inv : G₂ → G₁)
/-- Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse` -/
@[to_additive "Auxiliary definition used to define `liftOfRightInverse`"]
def liftOfRightInverseAux (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃) (hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) :
G₂ →* G₃ where
toFun b := g (f_inv b)
map_one' := hg (hf 1)
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [← g.map_mul, ← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one, f.map_mul]
simp only [hf _]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (x : G₁) : (f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g hg) (f x) = g x := by
dsimp [liftOfRightInverseAux]
rw [← mul_inv_eq_one, ← g.map_inv, ← g.map_mul, ← g.mem_ker]
apply hg
rw [f.mem_ker, f.map_mul, f.map_inv, mul_inv_eq_one]
simp only [hf _]
/-- `liftOfRightInverse f hf g hg` is the unique group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+* G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+* G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `MonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \
f | \ g
| \
v \⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```
-/
@[to_additive
"`liftOfRightInverse f f_inv hf g hg` is the unique additive group homomorphism `φ`
* such that `φ.comp f = g` (`AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp`),
* where `f : G₁ →+ G₂` has a RightInverse `f_inv` (`hf`),
* and `g : G₂ →+ G₃` satisfies `hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker`.
See `AddMonoidHom.eq_liftOfRightInverse` for the uniqueness lemma.
```
G₁.
| \\
f | \\ g
| \\
v \\⌟
G₂----> G₃
∃!φ
```"]
def liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) where
toFun g := f.liftOfRightInverseAux f_inv hf g.1 g.2
invFun φ := ⟨φ.comp f, fun x hx ↦ mem_ker.mpr <| by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]⟩
left_inv g := by
ext
simp only [comp_apply, liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv φ := by
ext b
simp [liftOfRightInverseAux, hf b]
/-- A non-computable version of `MonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no computable right
inverse is available, that uses `Function.surjInv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"A non-computable version of `AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse` for when no
computable right inverse is available."]
noncomputable abbrev liftOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
{ g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker } ≃ (G₂ →* G₃) :=
f.liftOfRightInverse (Function.surjInv hf) (Function.rightInverse_surjInv hf)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) (x : G₁) :
(f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g) (f x) = g.1 x :=
f.liftOfRightInverseAux_comp_apply f_inv hf g.1 g.2 x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftOfRightInverse_comp (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f)
(g : { g : G₁ →* G₃ // f.ker ≤ g.ker }) : (f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf g).comp f = g :=
MonoidHom.ext <| f.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply f_inv hf g
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_liftOfRightInverse (hf : Function.RightInverse f_inv f) (g : G₁ →* G₃)
(hg : f.ker ≤ g.ker) (h : G₂ →* G₃) (hh : h.comp f = g) :
h = f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf ⟨g, hg⟩ := by
simp_rw [← hh]
exact ((f.liftOfRightInverse f_inv hf).apply_symm_apply _).symm
end MonoidHom
variable {N : Type*} [Group N]
namespace Subgroup
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `comap`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.comap {H : Subgroup N} (hH : H.Normal) (f : G →* N) : (H.comap f).Normal :=
⟨fun _ => by simp +contextual [Subgroup.mem_comap, hH.conj_mem]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_comap {H : Subgroup N} [nH : H.Normal] (f : G →* N) :
(H.comap f).Normal :=
nH.comap _
-- Here `H.Normal` is an explicit argument so we can use dot notation with `subgroupOf`.
@[to_additive]
theorem Normal.subgroupOf {H : Subgroup G} (hH : H.Normal) (K : Subgroup G) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal :=
hH.comap _
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) normal_subgroupOf {H N : Subgroup G} [N.Normal] :
(N.subgroupOf H).Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_comap _
theorem map_normalClosure (s : Set G) (f : G →* N) (hf : Surjective f) :
(normalClosure s).map f = normalClosure (f '' s) := by
have : Normal (map f (normalClosure s)) := Normal.map inferInstance f hf
apply le_antisymm
· simp [map_le_iff_le_comap, normalClosure_le_normal, coe_comap,
← Set.image_subset_iff, subset_normalClosure]
· exact normalClosure_le_normal (Set.image_subset f subset_normalClosure)
theorem comap_normalClosure (s : Set N) (f : G ≃* N) :
normalClosure (f ⁻¹' s) = (normalClosure s).comap f := by
have := Set.preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm s f.toEquiv
simp_all [comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, map_normalClosure s (f.symm : N →* G) f.symm.surjective]
lemma Normal.of_map_injective {G H : Type*} [Group G] [Group H] {φ : G →* H}
(hφ : Function.Injective φ) {L : Subgroup G} (n : (L.map φ).Normal) : L.Normal :=
L.comap_map_eq_self_of_injective hφ ▸ n.comap φ
theorem Normal.of_map_subtype {K : Subgroup G} {L : Subgroup K}
(n : (Subgroup.map K.subtype L).Normal) : L.Normal :=
n.of_map_injective K.subtype_injective
end Subgroup
namespace Subgroup
section SubgroupNormal
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_iff {H K : Subgroup G} (hHK : H ≤ K) :
(H.subgroupOf K).Normal ↔ ∀ h k, h ∈ H → k ∈ K → k * h * k⁻¹ ∈ H :=
⟨fun hN h k hH hK => hN.conj_mem ⟨h, hHK hH⟩ hH ⟨k, hK⟩, fun hN =>
{ conj_mem := fun h hm k => hN h.1 k.1 hm k.2 }⟩
@[to_additive prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal]
instance prod_subgroupOf_prod_normal {H₁ K₁ : Subgroup G} {H₂ K₂ : Subgroup N}
[h₁ : (H₁.subgroupOf K₁).Normal] [h₂ : (H₂.subgroupOf K₂).Normal] :
((H₁.prod H₂).subgroupOf (K₁.prod K₂)).Normal where
conj_mem n hgHK g :=
⟨h₁.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp n.2).1⟩ hgHK.1
⟨(g : G × N).fst, (mem_prod.mp g.2).1⟩,
h₂.conj_mem ⟨(n : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp n.2).2⟩ hgHK.2
⟨(g : G × N).snd, (mem_prod.mp g.2).2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_addSubgroupOf_sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_addSubgroupOf_prod_normal
@[to_additive prod_normal]
instance prod_normal (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] :
(H.prod K).Normal where
conj_mem n hg g :=
⟨hH.conj_mem n.fst (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).1 g.fst,
hK.conj_mem n.snd (Subgroup.mem_prod.mp hg).2 g.snd⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.sum_normal := AddSubgroup.prod_normal
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_right (A B' B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (B'.subgroupOf B).Normal] : ((A ⊓ B').subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf A.le_normalizer hN) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_subgroupOf_inf_normal_of_left {A' A : Subgroup G} (B : Subgroup G)
[hN : (A'.subgroupOf A).Normal] : ((A' ⊓ B).subgroupOf (A ⊓ B)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf] at hN ⊢
rw [inf_inf_inf_comm, inf_idem]
exact le_trans (inf_le_inf hN B.le_normalizer) (inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf)
@[to_additive]
instance normal_inf_normal (H K : Subgroup G) [hH : H.Normal] [hK : K.Normal] : (H ⊓ K).Normal :=
⟨fun n hmem g => ⟨hH.conj_mem n hmem.1 g, hK.conj_mem n hmem.2 g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_iInf_normal {ι : Type*} {a : ι → Subgroup G}
(norm : ∀ i : ι, (a i).Normal) : (iInf a).Normal := by
constructor
intro g g_in_iInf h
rw [Subgroup.mem_iInf] at g_in_iInf ⊢
intro i
exact (norm i).conj_mem g (g_in_iInf i) h
@[to_additive]
theorem SubgroupNormal.mem_comm {H K : Subgroup G} (hK : H ≤ K) [hN : (H.subgroupOf K).Normal]
{a b : G} (hb : b ∈ K) (h : a * b ∈ H) : b * a ∈ H := by
have := (normal_subgroupOf_iff hK).mp hN (a * b) b h hb
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one] at this
/-- Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of disjoint, normal subgroups commute."]
theorem commute_of_normal_of_disjoint (H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G) (hH₁ : H₁.Normal) (hH₂ : H₂.Normal)
(hdis : Disjoint H₁ H₂) (x y : G) (hx : x ∈ H₁) (hy : y ∈ H₂) : Commute x y := by
suffices x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ = 1 by
show x * y = y * x
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv] at this
simpa
apply hdis.le_bot
constructor
· suffices x * (y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹) ∈ H₁ by simpa [mul_assoc]
exact H₁.mul_mem hx (hH₁.conj_mem _ (H₁.inv_mem hx) _)
· show x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H₂
apply H₂.mul_mem _ (H₂.inv_mem hy)
apply hH₂.conj_mem _ hy
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf H).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer_inf]
exact (le_inf hLE H.le_normalizer).trans inf_normalizer_le_normalizer_inf
@[to_additive]
theorem normal_subgroupOf_sup_of_le_normalizer {H N : Subgroup G}
(hLE : H ≤ N.normalizer) : (N.subgroupOf (H ⊔ N)).Normal := by
rw [normal_subgroupOf_iff_le_normalizer le_sup_right]
exact sup_le hLE le_normalizer
end SubgroupNormal
end Subgroup
namespace IsConj
open Subgroup
theorem normalClosure_eq_top_of {N : Subgroup G} [hn : N.Normal] {g g' : G} {hg : g ∈ N}
{hg' : g' ∈ N} (hc : IsConj g g') (ht : normalClosure ({⟨g, hg⟩} : Set N) = ⊤) :
normalClosure ({⟨g', hg'⟩} : Set N) = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 hc
have h : ∀ x : N, (MulAut.conj c) x ∈ N := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hn.conj_mem _ hx c
have hs : Function.Surjective (((MulAut.conj c).toMonoidHom.restrict N).codRestrict _ h) := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨c⁻¹ * x * c, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· have h := hn.conj_mem _ hx c⁻¹
rwa [inv_inv] at h
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one]
rw [eq_top_iff, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 hs, MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
refine le_trans (map_mono (eq_top_iff.1 ht)) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (normalClosure_le_normal ?_))
rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
simp only [MonoidHom.codRestrict_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, MulAut.conj_apply, coe_mk,
MonoidHom.restrict_apply, mem_comap]
exact subset_normalClosure (Set.mem_singleton _)
end IsConj
namespace ConjClasses
/-- The conjugacy classes that are not trivial. -/
def noncenter (G : Type*) [Monoid G] : Set (ConjClasses G) :=
{x | x.carrier.Nontrivial}
@[simp] lemma mem_noncenter {G} [Monoid G] (g : ConjClasses G) :
g ∈ noncenter G ↔ g.carrier.Nontrivial := Iff.rfl
end ConjClasses
/-- Suppose `G` acts on `M` and `I` is a subgroup of `M`.
The inertia subgroup of `I` is the subgroup of `G` whose action is trivial mod `I`. -/
def AddSubgroup.inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] (I : AddSubgroup M) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [MulAction G M] : Subgroup G where
carrier := { σ | ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I }
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb x := by simpa [mul_smul] using add_mem (ha (b • x)) (hb x)
one_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
inv_mem' {a} ha x := by simpa using sub_mem_comm_iff.mp (ha (a⁻¹ • x))
@[simp] lemma AddSubgroup.mem_inertia {M : Type*} [AddGroup M] {I : AddSubgroup M} {G : Type*}
[Group G] [MulAction G M] {σ : G} : σ ∈ I.inertia G ↔ ∀ x, σ • x - x ∈ I := .rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,846 | 1,847 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
| @[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 346 | 349 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.L1
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.VitaliCaratheodory
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 2,015 | 2,019 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.LinearOrder
/-!
# Booleans
This file proves various trivial lemmas about booleans and their
relation to decidable propositions.
## Tags
bool, boolean, Bool, De Morgan
-/
namespace Bool
section
/-!
This section contains lemmas about booleans which were present in core Lean 3.
The remainder of this file contains lemmas about booleans from mathlib 3.
-/
theorem true_eq_false_eq_False : ¬true = false := by decide
theorem false_eq_true_eq_False : ¬false = true := by decide
theorem eq_false_eq_not_eq_true (b : Bool) : (¬b = true) = (b = false) := by simp
theorem eq_true_eq_not_eq_false (b : Bool) : (¬b = false) = (b = true) := by simp
theorem eq_false_of_not_eq_true {b : Bool} : ¬b = true → b = false :=
Eq.mp (eq_false_eq_not_eq_true b)
theorem eq_true_of_not_eq_false {b : Bool} : ¬b = false → b = true :=
Eq.mp (eq_true_eq_not_eq_false b)
theorem and_eq_true_eq_eq_true_and_eq_true (a b : Bool) :
((a && b) = true) = (a = true ∧ b = true) := by simp
theorem or_eq_true_eq_eq_true_or_eq_true (a b : Bool) :
((a || b) = true) = (a = true ∨ b = true) := by simp
theorem not_eq_true_eq_eq_false (a : Bool) : (not a = true) = (a = false) := by cases a <;> simp
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-05
this is no longer a simp lemma, as the LHS simplifies. -/
theorem and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false (a b : Bool) :
((a && b) = false) = (a = false ∨ b = false) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem or_eq_false_eq_eq_false_and_eq_false (a b : Bool) :
((a || b) = false) = (a = false ∧ b = false) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem not_eq_false_eq_eq_true (a : Bool) : (not a = false) = (a = true) := by cases a <;> simp
theorem coe_false : ↑false = False := by simp
theorem coe_true : ↑true = True := by simp
theorem coe_sort_false : (false : Prop) = False := by simp
theorem coe_sort_true : (true : Prop) = True := by simp
theorem decide_iff (p : Prop) [d : Decidable p] : decide p = true ↔ p := by simp
theorem decide_true {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : p → decide p :=
(decide_iff p).2
theorem of_decide_true {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : decide p → p :=
(decide_iff p).1
theorem bool_iff_false {b : Bool} : ¬b ↔ b = false := by cases b <;> decide
theorem bool_eq_false {b : Bool} : ¬b → b = false :=
bool_iff_false.1
theorem decide_false_iff (p : Prop) {_ : Decidable p} : decide p = false ↔ ¬p :=
bool_iff_false.symm.trans (not_congr (decide_iff _))
theorem decide_false {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : ¬p → decide p = false :=
(decide_false_iff p).2
theorem of_decide_false {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : decide p = false → ¬p :=
(decide_false_iff p).1
theorem decide_congr {p q : Prop} [Decidable p] [Decidable q] (h : p ↔ q) : decide p = decide q :=
decide_eq_decide.mpr h
theorem coe_xor_iff (a b : Bool) : xor a b ↔ Xor' (a = true) (b = true) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> decide
end
theorem dichotomy (b : Bool) : b = false ∨ b = true := by cases b <;> simp
theorem not_ne_id : not ≠ id := fun h ↦ false_ne_true <| congrFun h true
theorem or_inl {a b : Bool} (H : a) : a || b := by simp [H]
theorem or_inr {a b : Bool} (H : b) : a || b := by cases a <;> simp [H]
theorem and_elim_left : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a && b → a := by decide
theorem and_intro : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a → b → a && b := by decide
theorem and_elim_right : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a && b → b := by decide
lemma eq_not_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a = !b ↔ a ≠ b := by decide
lemma not_eq_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, !a = b ↔ a ≠ b := by decide
theorem ne_not {a b : Bool} : a ≠ !b ↔ a = b :=
not_eq_not
lemma not_ne_self : ∀ b : Bool, (!b) ≠ b := by decide
lemma self_ne_not : ∀ b : Bool, b ≠ !b := by decide
lemma eq_or_eq_not : ∀ a b, a = b ∨ a = !b := by decide
-- TODO naming issue: these two `not` are different.
theorem not_iff_not : ∀ {b : Bool}, !b ↔ ¬b := by simp
theorem eq_true_of_not_eq_false' {a : Bool} : !a = false → a = true := by
cases a <;> decide
theorem eq_false_of_not_eq_true' {a : Bool} : !a = true → a = false := by
cases a <;> decide
theorem bne_eq_xor : bne = xor := by funext a b; revert a b; decide
attribute [simp] xor_assoc
theorem xor_iff_ne : ∀ {x y : Bool}, xor x y = true ↔ x ≠ y := by decide
/-! ### De Morgan's laws for booleans -/
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Bool where
le_refl := by decide
le_trans := by decide
le_antisymm := by decide
le_total := by decide
toDecidableLE := inferInstance
toDecidableEq := inferInstance
toDecidableLT := inferInstance
lt_iff_le_not_le := by decide
max_def := by decide
min_def := by decide
theorem lt_iff : ∀ {x y : Bool}, x < y ↔ x = false ∧ y = true := by decide
@[simp]
theorem false_lt_true : false < true :=
lt_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem le_iff_imp : ∀ {x y : Bool}, x ≤ y ↔ x → y := by decide
theorem and_le_left : ∀ x y : Bool, (x && y) ≤ x := by decide
theorem and_le_right : ∀ x y : Bool, (x && y) ≤ y := by decide
theorem le_and : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, x ≤ y → x ≤ z → x ≤ (y && z) := by decide
theorem left_le_or : ∀ x y : Bool, x ≤ (x || y) := by decide
theorem right_le_or : ∀ x y : Bool, y ≤ (x || y) := by decide
theorem or_le : ∀ {x y z}, x ≤ z → y ≤ z → (x || y) ≤ z := by decide
/-- convert a `ℕ` to a `Bool`, `0 -> false`, everything else -> `true` -/
def ofNat (n : Nat) : Bool :=
decide (n ≠ 0)
@[simp] lemma toNat_beq_zero (b : Bool) : (b.toNat == 0) = !b := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma toNat_bne_zero (b : Bool) : (b.toNat != 0) = b := by simp [bne]
@[simp] lemma toNat_beq_one (b : Bool) : (b.toNat == 1) = b := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma toNat_bne_one (b : Bool) : (b.toNat != 1) = !b := by simp [bne]
theorem ofNat_le_ofNat {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) : ofNat n ≤ ofNat m := by
simp only [ofNat, ne_eq, _root_.decide_not]
cases Nat.decEq n 0 with
| isTrue hn => rw [_root_.decide_eq_true hn]; exact Bool.false_le _
| isFalse hn =>
cases Nat.decEq m 0 with
| isFalse hm => rw [_root_.decide_eq_false hm]; exact Bool.le_true _
| isTrue hm => subst hm; have h := Nat.le_antisymm h (Nat.zero_le n); contradiction
theorem toNat_le_toNat {b₀ b₁ : Bool} (h : b₀ ≤ b₁) : toNat b₀ ≤ toNat b₁ := by
cases b₀ <;> cases b₁ <;> simp_all +decide
theorem ofNat_toNat (b : Bool) : ofNat (toNat b) = b := by
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem injective_iff {α : Sort*} {f : Bool → α} : Function.Injective f ↔ f false ≠ f true :=
⟨fun Hinj Heq ↦ false_ne_true (Hinj Heq), fun H x y hxy ↦ by
cases x <;> cases y
· rfl
· exact (H hxy).elim
· exact (H hxy.symm).elim
· rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Bool/Basic.lean | 210 | 210 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.GroupRingAction
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Invariant
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Defs
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Matrix
/-!
# Fixed field under a group action.
This is the basis of the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory.
Given a (finite) group `G` that acts on a field `F`, we define `FixedPoints.subfield G F`,
the subfield consisting of elements of `F` fixed_points by every element of `G`.
This subfield is then normal and separable, and in addition if `G` acts faithfully on `F`
then `finrank (FixedPoints.subfield G F) F = Fintype.card G`.
## Main Definitions
- `FixedPoints.subfield G F`, the subfield consisting of elements of `F` fixed_points by every
element of `G`, where `G` is a group that acts on `F`.
-/
noncomputable section
open MulAction Finset Module
universe u v w
variable {M : Type u} [Monoid M]
variable (G : Type u) [Group G]
variable (F : Type v) [Field F] [MulSemiringAction M F] [MulSemiringAction G F] (m : M)
/-- The subfield of F fixed by the field endomorphism `m`. -/
def FixedBy.subfield : Subfield F where
carrier := fixedBy F m
zero_mem' := smul_zero m
add_mem' hx hy := (smul_add m _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ hx hy
neg_mem' hx := (smul_neg m _).trans <| congr_arg _ hx
one_mem' := smul_one m
mul_mem' hx hy := (smul_mul' m _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ hx hy
inv_mem' x hx := (smul_inv'' m x).trans <| congr_arg _ hx
section InvariantSubfields
variable (M) {F}
/-- A typeclass for subrings invariant under a `MulSemiringAction`. -/
class IsInvariantSubfield (S : Subfield F) : Prop where
smul_mem : ∀ (m : M) {x : F}, x ∈ S → m • x ∈ S
variable (S : Subfield F)
instance IsInvariantSubfield.toMulSemiringAction [IsInvariantSubfield M S] :
MulSemiringAction M S where
smul m x := ⟨m • x.1, IsInvariantSubfield.smul_mem m x.2⟩
one_smul s := Subtype.eq <| one_smul M s.1
mul_smul m₁ m₂ s := Subtype.eq <| mul_smul m₁ m₂ s.1
smul_add m s₁ s₂ := Subtype.eq <| smul_add m s₁.1 s₂.1
smul_zero m := Subtype.eq <| smul_zero m
smul_one m := Subtype.eq <| smul_one m
smul_mul m s₁ s₂ := Subtype.eq <| smul_mul' m s₁.1 s₂.1
instance [IsInvariantSubfield M S] : IsInvariantSubring M S.toSubring where
smul_mem := IsInvariantSubfield.smul_mem
end InvariantSubfields
namespace FixedPoints
variable (M)
-- we use `Subfield.copy` so that the underlying set is `fixedPoints M F`
/-- The subfield of fixed points by a monoid action. -/
def subfield : Subfield F :=
Subfield.copy (⨅ m : M, FixedBy.subfield F m) (fixedPoints M F)
(by ext z; simp [fixedPoints, FixedBy.subfield, iInf, Subfield.mem_sInf]; rfl)
instance : IsInvariantSubfield M (FixedPoints.subfield M F) where
smul_mem g x hx g' := by rw [hx, hx]
instance : SMulCommClass M (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F where
smul_comm m f f' := show m • (↑f * f') = f * m • f' by rw [smul_mul', f.prop m]
instance smulCommClass' : SMulCommClass (FixedPoints.subfield M F) M F :=
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul (m : M) (x : FixedPoints.subfield M F) : m • x = x :=
Subtype.eq <| x.2 m
-- Why is this so slow?
@[simp]
theorem smul_polynomial (m : M) (p : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield M F)) : m • p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun x => by rw [Polynomial.smul_C, smul])
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [smul_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [smul_mul', Polynomial.smul_C, smul, smul_pow', Polynomial.smul_X]
instance : Algebra (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F := by infer_instance
theorem coe_algebraMap :
algebraMap (FixedPoints.subfield M F) F = Subfield.subtype (FixedPoints.subfield M F) :=
rfl
theorem linearIndependent_smul_of_linearIndependent {s : Finset F} :
(LinearIndepOn (FixedPoints.subfield G F) id (s : Set F)) →
LinearIndepOn F (MulAction.toFun G F) s := by
classical
have : IsEmpty ((∅ : Finset F) : Set F) := by simp
refine Finset.induction_on s (fun _ => linearIndependent_empty_type) fun a s has ih hs => ?_
rw [coe_insert] at hs ⊢
rw [linearIndepOn_insert (mt mem_coe.1 has)] at hs
rw [linearIndepOn_insert (mt mem_coe.1 has)]; refine ⟨ih hs.1, fun ha => ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_linearCombination] at ha; rcases ha with ⟨l, hl, hla⟩
rw [Finsupp.linearCombination_apply_of_mem_supported F hl] at hla
suffices ∀ i ∈ s, l i ∈ FixedPoints.subfield G F by
replace hla := (sum_apply _ _ fun i => l i • toFun G F i).symm.trans (congr_fun hla 1)
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, toFun_apply, one_smul] at hla
refine hs.2 (hla ▸ Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c hcs => ?_)
change (⟨l c, this c hcs⟩ : FixedPoints.subfield G F) • c ∈ _
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ <| Submodule.subset_span <| by simpa
intro i his g
refine
eq_of_sub_eq_zero
(linearIndependent_iff'.1 (ih hs.1) s.attach (fun i => g • l i - l i) ?_ ⟨i, his⟩
(mem_attach _ _) :
_)
refine (sum_attach s fun i ↦ (g • l i - l i) • MulAction.toFun G F i).trans ?_
ext g'; dsimp only
conv_lhs =>
rw [sum_apply]
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [Pi.smul_apply, sub_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [sum_sub_distrib, Pi.zero_apply, sub_eq_zero]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext x
rw [toFun_apply, ← mul_inv_cancel_left g g', mul_smul, ← smul_mul', ← toFun_apply _ x]
show
(∑ x ∈ s, g • (fun y => l y • MulAction.toFun G F y) x (g⁻¹ * g')) =
∑ x ∈ s, (fun y => l y • MulAction.toFun G F y) x g'
rw [← smul_sum, ← sum_apply _ _ fun y => l y • toFun G F y, ←
sum_apply _ _ fun y => l y • toFun G F y]
rw [hla, toFun_apply, toFun_apply, smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype G] (x : F)
/-- `minpoly G F x` is the minimal polynomial of `(x : F)` over `FixedPoints.subfield G F`. -/
def minpoly : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F) :=
(prodXSubSMul G F x).toSubring (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring fun _ hc g =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := Polynomial.mem_coeffs_iff.1 hc
hn.symm ▸ prodXSubSMul.coeff G F x g n
namespace minpoly
theorem monic : (minpoly G F x).Monic := by
simp only [minpoly]
rw [Polynomial.monic_toSubring]
exact prodXSubSMul.monic G F x
theorem eval₂ :
Polynomial.eval₂ (Subring.subtype <| (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring) x (minpoly G F x) =
0 := by
rw [← prodXSubSMul.eval G F x, Polynomial.eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp only [minpoly, Polynomial.map_toSubring]
theorem eval₂' :
Polynomial.eval₂ (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F) x (minpoly G F x) = 0 :=
eval₂ G F x
theorem ne_one : minpoly G F x ≠ (1 : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F)) := fun H =>
have := eval₂ G F x
(one_ne_zero : (1 : F) ≠ 0) <| by rwa [H, Polynomial.eval₂_one] at this
theorem of_eval₂ (f : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F))
(hf : Polynomial.eval₂ (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F) x f = 0) :
minpoly G F x ∣ f := by
classical
rw [← Polynomial.map_dvd_map' (Subfield.subtype <| FixedPoints.subfield G F), minpoly,
← Subfield.toSubring_subtype_eq_subtype, Polynomial.map_toSubring _ _, prodXSubSMul]
refine
Fintype.prod_dvd_of_coprime
(Polynomial.pairwise_coprime_X_sub_C <| MulAction.injective_ofQuotientStabilizer G x) fun y =>
QuotientGroup.induction_on y fun g => ?_
rw [Polynomial.dvd_iff_isRoot, Polynomial.IsRoot.def, MulAction.ofQuotientStabilizer_mk,
Polynomial.eval_smul',
← IsInvariantSubring.coe_subtypeHom' G (FixedPoints.subfield G F).toSubring,
← MulSemiringActionHom.coe_polynomial, ← MulSemiringActionHom.map_smul, smul_polynomial,
MulSemiringActionHom.coe_polynomial, IsInvariantSubring.coe_subtypeHom',
Polynomial.eval_map, Subfield.toSubring_subtype_eq_subtype, hf, smul_zero]
-- Why is this so slow?
theorem irreducible_aux (f g : Polynomial (FixedPoints.subfield G F)) (hf : f.Monic) (hg : g.Monic)
(hfg : f * g = minpoly G F x) : f = 1 ∨ g = 1 := by
have hf2 : f ∣ minpoly G F x := by rw [← hfg]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _
have hg2 : g ∣ minpoly G F x := by rw [← hfg]; exact dvd_mul_left _ _
have := eval₂ G F x
rw [← hfg, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, mul_eq_zero] at this
rcases this with this | this
· right
have hf3 : f = minpoly G F x :=
Polynomial.eq_of_monic_of_associated hf (monic G F x)
(associated_of_dvd_dvd hf2 <| @of_eval₂ G _ F _ _ _ x f this)
rwa [← mul_one (minpoly G F x), hf3, mul_right_inj' (monic G F x).ne_zero] at hfg
· left
have hg3 : g = minpoly G F x :=
Polynomial.eq_of_monic_of_associated hg (monic G F x)
(associated_of_dvd_dvd hg2 <| @of_eval₂ G _ F _ _ _ x g this)
rwa [← one_mul (minpoly G F x), hg3, mul_left_inj' (monic G F x).ne_zero] at hfg
|
theorem irreducible : Irreducible (minpoly G F x) :=
(Polynomial.irreducible_of_monic (monic G F x) (ne_one G F x)).2 (irreducible_aux G F x)
end minpoly
end Fintype
theorem isIntegral [Finite G] (x : F) : IsIntegral (FixedPoints.subfield G F) x := by
cases nonempty_fintype G; exact ⟨minpoly G F x, minpoly.monic G F x, minpoly.eval₂ G F x⟩
section Fintype
variable [Fintype G] (x : F)
theorem minpoly_eq_minpoly : minpoly G F x = _root_.minpoly (FixedPoints.subfield G F) x :=
minpoly.eq_of_irreducible_of_monic (minpoly.irreducible G F x) (minpoly.eval₂ G F x)
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Fixed.lean | 225 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
/-!
# Braided and symmetric monoidal categories
The basic definitions of braided monoidal categories, and symmetric monoidal categories,
as well as braided functors.
## Implementation note
We make `BraidedCategory` another typeclass, but then have `SymmetricCategory` extend this.
The rationale is that we are not carrying any additional data, just requiring a property.
## Future work
* Construct the Drinfeld center of a monoidal category as a braided monoidal category.
* Say something about pseudo-natural transformations.
## References
* [Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, Victor Ostrik, *Tensor categories*][egno15]
-/
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category MonoidalCategory Functor.LaxMonoidal Functor.OplaxMonoidal Functor.Monoidal
/-- A braided monoidal category is a monoidal category equipped with a braiding isomorphism
`β_ X Y : X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X`
which is natural in both arguments,
and also satisfies the two hexagon identities.
-/
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
/-- The braiding natural isomorphism. -/
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
/-- The first hexagon identity. -/
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
/-- The second hexagon identity. -/
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
namespace BraidedCategory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] [BraidedCategory.{v} C]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫
(β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫ (α_ Z X Y).hom := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Z X Y).inv).1
simp [hexagon_reverse]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Y Z X).hom).1
simp [hexagon_forward]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ Z X Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ Y Z X).hom ≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫
(β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (braiding Y Y').hom = (braiding X X').hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) := by
rw [tensorHom_def' f g, tensorHom_def g f]
simp_rw [Category.assoc, braiding_naturality_left, braiding_naturality_right_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_right (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
X ◁ f ≫ (β_ Z X).inv = (β_ Y X).inv ≫ f ▷ X :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_left f X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ (β_ Z Y).inv = (β_ Z X).inv ≫ Z ◁ f :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality_right Z f
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem braiding_inv_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (β_ Y' Y).inv = (β_ X' X).inv ≫ (g ⊗ f) :=
CommSq.w <| .vert_inv <| .mk <| braiding_naturality g f
/-- In a braided monoidal category, the functors `tensorLeft X` and
`tensorRight X` are isomorphic. -/
@[simps]
def tensorLeftIsoTensorRight (X : C) :
tensorLeft X ≅ tensorRight X where
hom := { app Y := (β_ X Y).hom }
inv := { app Y := (β_ X Y).inv }
@[reassoc]
theorem yang_baxter (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X ≫ (α_ Z Y X).hom =
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom := by
rw [← braiding_tensor_right_assoc X Y Z, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).inv]
repeat rw [assoc]
rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, ← braiding_naturality_right, braiding_tensor_right]
theorem yang_baxter' (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ⊗≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ Y Z).hom ▷ X =
𝟙 _ ⊗≫ (X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ⊗≫ (β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ⊗≫ Z ◁ (β_ X Y).hom) ⊗≫ 𝟙 _ := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv, ← cancel_mono (α_ Z Y X).hom]
convert yang_baxter X Y Z using 1
all_goals monoidal
theorem yang_baxter_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) ≪≫ (α_ Y Z X).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ Y Z) X ≪≫ (α_ Z Y X) =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y ≪≫ α_ Z X Y ≪≫
whiskerLeftIso Z (β_ X Y) := Iso.ext (yang_baxter X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_forward_iso (X Y Z : C) :
α_ X Y Z ≪≫ β_ X (Y ⊗ Z) ≪≫ α_ Y Z X =
whiskerRightIso (β_ X Y) Z ≪≫ α_ Y X Z ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y (β_ X Z) :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_forward X Y Z)
theorem hexagon_reverse_iso (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ X Y Z).symm ≪≫ β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≪≫ (α_ Z X Y).symm =
whiskerLeftIso X (β_ Y Z) ≪≫ (α_ X Z Y).symm ≪≫ whiskerRightIso (β_ X Z) Y :=
Iso.ext (hexagon_reverse X Y Z)
@[reassoc]
theorem hexagon_forward_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Y Z X).inv ≫ (β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp
| @[reassoc]
theorem hexagon_reverse_inv (X Y Z : C) :
(α_ Z X Y).hom ≫ (β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 187 | 190 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Transvections
Transvections are matrices of the form `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`, where `stdBasisMatrix i j c`
is the basic matrix with a `c` at position `(i, j)`. Multiplying by such a transvection on the left
(resp. on the right) amounts to adding `c` times the `j`-th row to the `i`-th row
(resp `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column). Therefore, they are useful to present
algorithms operating on rows and columns.
Transvections are a special case of *elementary matrices* (according to most references, these also
contain the matrices exchanging rows, and the matrices multiplying a row by a constant).
We show that, over a field, any matrix can be written as `L * D * L'`, where `L` and `L'` are
products of transvections and `D` is diagonal. In other words, one can reduce a matrix to diagonal
form by operations on its rows and columns, a variant of Gauss' pivot algorithm.
## Main definitions and results
* `transvection i j c` is the matrix equal to `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`.
* `TransvectionStruct n R` is a structure containing the data of `i, j, c` and a proof that
`i ≠ j`. These are often easier to manipulate than straight matrices, especially in inductive
arguments.
* `exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec` states that any matrix `M` over a field can
be written in the form `t_1 * ... * t_k * D * t'_1 * ... * t'_l`, where `D` is diagonal and
the `t_i`, `t'_j` are transvections.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction` shows that a property which is true for diagonal matrices and
transvections, and invariant under product, is true for all matrices.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero` is the same statement over invertible matrices.
## Implementation details
The proof of the reduction results is done inductively on the size of the matrices, reducing an
`(r + 1) × (r + 1)` matrix to a matrix whose last row and column are zeroes, except possibly for
the last diagonal entry. This step is done as follows.
If all the coefficients on the last row and column are zero, there is nothing to do. Otherwise,
one can put a nonzero coefficient in the last diagonal entry by a row or column operation, and then
subtract this last diagonal entry from the other entries in the last row and column to make them
vanish.
This step is done in the type `Fin r ⊕ Unit`, where `Fin r` is useful to choose arbitrarily some
order in which we cancel the coefficients, and the sum structure is useful to use the formalism of
block matrices.
To proceed with the induction, we reindex our matrices to reduce to the above situation.
-/
universe u₁ u₂
namespace Matrix
variable (n p : Type*) (R : Type u₂) {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p]
variable [CommRing R]
section Transvection
variable {R n} (i j : n)
/-- The transvection matrix `transvection i j c` is equal to the identity plus `c` at position
`(i, j)`. Multiplying by it on the left (as in `transvection i j c * M`) corresponds to adding
`c` times the `j`-th row of `M` to its `i`-th row. Multiplying by it on the right corresponds
to adding `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column. -/
def transvection (c : R) : Matrix n n R :=
1 + Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c
@[simp]
theorem transvection_zero : transvection i j (0 : R) = 1 := by simp [transvection]
section
/-- A transvection matrix is obtained from the identity by adding `c` times the `j`-th row to
the `i`-th row. -/
theorem updateRow_eq_transvection [Finite n] (c : R) :
updateRow (1 : Matrix n n R) i ((1 : Matrix n n R) i + c • (1 : Matrix n n R) j) =
transvection i j c := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
ext a b
by_cases ha : i = a
· by_cases hb : j = b
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, transvection, add_apply, StdBasisMatrix.apply_same]
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, add_zero, transvection, add_apply, and_false, not_false_eq_true,
StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne]
· simp only [updateRow_ne, transvection, ha, Ne.symm ha, StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne, add_zero,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Ne, not_false_iff, DMatrix.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
mul_zero, false_and, add_apply]
variable [Fintype n]
theorem transvection_mul_transvection_same (h : i ≠ j) (c d : R) :
transvection i j c * transvection i j d = transvection i j (c + d) := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, Matrix.mul_add, h, h.symm, add_smul, add_assoc,
stdBasisMatrix_add]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_same (b : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) i b = M i b + c * M j b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_same (a : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a j = M a j + c * M a i := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (ha : a ≠ i) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, ha]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (hb : b ≠ j) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, hb]
@[simp]
theorem det_transvection_of_ne (h : i ≠ j) (c : R) : det (transvection i j c) = 1 := by
rw [← updateRow_eq_transvection i j, det_updateRow_add_smul_self _ h, det_one]
end
variable (R n)
/-- A structure containing all the information from which one can build a nontrivial transvection.
This structure is easier to manipulate than transvections as one has a direct access to all the
relevant fields. -/
structure TransvectionStruct where
(i j : n)
hij : i ≠ j
c : R
instance [Nontrivial n] : Nonempty (TransvectionStruct n R) := by
choose x y hxy using exists_pair_ne n
exact ⟨⟨x, y, hxy, 0⟩⟩
namespace TransvectionStruct
variable {R n}
/-- Associating to a `transvection_struct` the corresponding transvection matrix. -/
def toMatrix (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : Matrix n n R :=
transvection t.i t.j t.c
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_mk (i j : n) (hij : i ≠ j) (c : R) :
TransvectionStruct.toMatrix ⟨i, j, hij, c⟩ = transvection i j c :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem det [Fintype n] (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : det t.toMatrix = 1 :=
det_transvection_of_ne _ _ t.hij _
@[simp]
theorem det_toMatrix_prod [Fintype n] (L : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) :
det (L.map toMatrix).prod = 1 := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ IH => simp [IH]
/-- The inverse of a `TransvectionStruct`, designed so that `t.inv.toMatrix` is the inverse of
`t.toMatrix`. -/
@[simps]
protected def inv (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : TransvectionStruct n R where
i := t.i
j := t.j
hij := t.hij
c := -t.c
section
variable [Fintype n]
theorem inv_mul (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : t.inv.toMatrix * t.toMatrix = 1 := by
rcases t with ⟨_, _, t_hij⟩
simp [toMatrix, transvection_mul_transvection_same, t_hij]
theorem mul_inv (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : t.toMatrix * t.inv.toMatrix = 1 := by
rcases t with ⟨_, _, t_hij⟩
simp [toMatrix, transvection_mul_transvection_same, t_hij]
theorem reverse_inv_prod_mul_prod (L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) :
(L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod * (L.map toMatrix).prod = 1 := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH =>
suffices
(L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod * (t.inv.toMatrix * t.toMatrix) *
(L.map toMatrix).prod = 1
by simpa [Matrix.mul_assoc]
simpa [inv_mul] using IH
theorem prod_mul_reverse_inv_prod (L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) :
(L.map toMatrix).prod * (L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod = 1 := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH =>
suffices
t.toMatrix *
((L.map toMatrix).prod * (L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod) *
t.inv.toMatrix = 1
by simpa [Matrix.mul_assoc]
simp_rw [IH, Matrix.mul_one, t.mul_inv]
/-- `M` is a scalar matrix if it commutes with every nontrivial transvection (elementary matrix). -/
theorem _root_.Matrix.mem_range_scalar_of_commute_transvectionStruct {M : Matrix n n R}
(hM : ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n R, Commute t.toMatrix M) :
M ∈ Set.range (Matrix.scalar n) := by
refine mem_range_scalar_of_commute_stdBasisMatrix ?_
intro i j hij
simpa [transvection, mul_add, add_mul] using (hM ⟨i, j, hij, 1⟩).eq
theorem _root_.Matrix.mem_range_scalar_iff_commute_transvectionStruct {M : Matrix n n R} :
M ∈ Set.range (Matrix.scalar n) ↔ ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n R, Commute t.toMatrix M := by
refine ⟨fun h t => ?_, mem_range_scalar_of_commute_transvectionStruct⟩
rw [mem_range_scalar_iff_commute_stdBasisMatrix] at h
refine (Commute.one_left M).add_left ?_
convert (h _ _ t.hij).smul_left t.c using 1
rw [smul_stdBasisMatrix, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
end
open Sum
/-- Given a `TransvectionStruct` on `n`, define the corresponding `TransvectionStruct` on `n ⊕ p`
using the identity on `p`. -/
def sumInl (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : TransvectionStruct (n ⊕ p) R where
i := inl t.i
j := inl t.j
hij := by simp [t.hij]
c := t.c
theorem toMatrix_sumInl (t : TransvectionStruct n R) :
(t.sumInl p).toMatrix = fromBlocks t.toMatrix 0 0 1 := by
cases t
ext a b
rcases a with a | a <;> rcases b with b | b
· by_cases h : a = b <;> simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection, h, stdBasisMatrix]
· simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection]
· simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection]
· by_cases h : a = b <;> simp [TransvectionStruct.sumInl, transvection, h]
@[simp]
theorem sumInl_toMatrix_prod_mul [Fintype n] [Fintype p] (M : Matrix n n R)
(L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) (N : Matrix p p R) :
(L.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl p)).prod * fromBlocks M 0 0 N =
fromBlocks ((L.map toMatrix).prod * M) 0 0 N := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH => simp [Matrix.mul_assoc, IH, toMatrix_sumInl, fromBlocks_multiply]
@[simp]
theorem mul_sumInl_toMatrix_prod [Fintype n] [Fintype p] (M : Matrix n n R)
(L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) (N : Matrix p p R) :
fromBlocks M 0 0 N * (L.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl p)).prod =
fromBlocks (M * (L.map toMatrix).prod) 0 0 N := by
induction L generalizing M N with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH => simp [IH, toMatrix_sumInl, fromBlocks_multiply]
variable {p}
/-- Given a `TransvectionStruct` on `n` and an equivalence between `n` and `p`, define the
corresponding `TransvectionStruct` on `p`. -/
def reindexEquiv (e : n ≃ p) (t : TransvectionStruct n R) : TransvectionStruct p R where
i := e t.i
j := e t.j
hij := by simp [t.hij]
c := t.c
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype p]
theorem toMatrix_reindexEquiv (e : n ≃ p) (t : TransvectionStruct n R) :
(t.reindexEquiv e).toMatrix = reindexAlgEquiv R _ e t.toMatrix := by
rcases t with ⟨t_i, t_j, _⟩
ext a b
simp only [reindexEquiv, transvection, mul_boole, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, toMatrix_mk,
submatrix_apply, reindex_apply, DMatrix.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
by_cases ha : e t_i = a <;> by_cases hb : e t_j = b <;> by_cases hab : a = b <;>
simp [ha, hb, hab, ← e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, stdBasisMatrix]
theorem toMatrix_reindexEquiv_prod (e : n ≃ p) (L : List (TransvectionStruct n R)) :
(L.map (toMatrix ∘ reindexEquiv e)).prod = reindexAlgEquiv R _ e (L.map toMatrix).prod := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons t L IH =>
simp only [toMatrix_reindexEquiv, IH, Function.comp_apply, List.prod_cons,
reindexAlgEquiv_apply, List.map]
exact (reindexAlgEquiv_mul R _ _ _ _).symm
end TransvectionStruct
end Transvection
/-!
# Reducing matrices by left and right multiplication by transvections
In this section, we show that any matrix can be reduced to diagonal form by left and right
multiplication by transvections (or, equivalently, by elementary operations on lines and columns).
The main step is to kill the last row and column of a matrix in `Fin r ⊕ Unit` with nonzero last
coefficient, by subtracting this coefficient from the other ones. The list of these operations is
recorded in `list_transvec_col M` and `list_transvec_row M`. We have to analyze inductively how
these operations affect the coefficients in the last row and the last column to conclude that they
have the desired effect.
Once this is done, one concludes the reduction by induction on the size
of the matrices, through a suitable reindexing to identify any fintype with `Fin r ⊕ Unit`.
-/
namespace Pivot
variable {R} {r : ℕ} (M : Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜)
open Unit Sum Fin TransvectionStruct
/-- A list of transvections such that multiplying on the left with these transvections will replace
the last column with zeroes. -/
def listTransvecCol : List (Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
transvection (inl i) (inr unit) <| -M (inl i) (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)
/-- A list of transvections such that multiplying on the right with these transvections will replace
the last row with zeroes. -/
def listTransvecRow : List (Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
transvection (inr unit) (inl i) <| -M (inr unit) (inl i) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)
@[simp]
theorem length_listTransvecCol : (listTransvecCol M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecCol]
theorem listTransvecCol_getElem {i : ℕ} (h : i < (listTransvecCol M).length) :
(listTransvecCol M)[i] =
letI i' : Fin r := ⟨i, length_listTransvecCol M ▸ h⟩
transvection (inl i') (inr unit) <| -M (inl i') (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit) := by
simp [listTransvecCol]
@[simp]
theorem length_listTransvecRow : (listTransvecRow M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecRow]
theorem listTransvecRow_getElem {i : ℕ} (h : i < (listTransvecRow M).length) :
(listTransvecRow M)[i] =
letI i' : Fin r := ⟨i, length_listTransvecRow M ▸ h⟩
transvection (inr unit) (inl i') <| -M (inr unit) (inl i') / M (inr unit) (inr unit) := by
simp [listTransvecRow, Fin.cast]
/-- Multiplying by some of the matrices in `listTransvecCol M` does not change the last row. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_last_row_drop (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ r) :
(((listTransvecCol M).drop k).prod * M) (inr unit) i = M (inr unit) i := by
induction hk using Nat.decreasingInduction with
| of_succ n hn IH =>
have hn' : n < (listTransvecCol M).length := by simpa [listTransvecCol] using hn
rw [List.drop_eq_getElem_cons hn']
simpa [listTransvecCol, Matrix.mul_assoc]
| self =>
simp only [length_listTransvecCol, le_refl, List.drop_eq_nil_of_le, List.prod_nil,
Matrix.one_mul]
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecCol M` does not change the last row. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_last_row (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M) (inr unit) i = M (inr unit) i := by
simpa using listTransvecCol_mul_last_row_drop M i (zero_le _)
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecCol M` kills all the coefficients in the
last column but the last one. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_last_col (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) (i : Fin r) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M) (inl i) (inr unit) = 0 := by
suffices H :
∀ k : ℕ,
k ≤ r →
(((listTransvecCol M).drop k).prod * M) (inl i) (inr unit) =
if k ≤ i then 0 else M (inl i) (inr unit) by
simpa only [List.drop, _root_.zero_le, ite_true] using H 0 (zero_le _)
intro k hk
induction hk using Nat.decreasingInduction with
| of_succ n hn IH =>
have hn' : n < (listTransvecCol M).length := by simpa [listTransvecCol] using hn
let n' : Fin r := ⟨n, hn⟩
rw [List.drop_eq_getElem_cons hn']
have A :
(listTransvecCol M)[n] =
transvection (inl n') (inr unit) (-M (inl n') (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)) := by
simp [n', listTransvecCol]
simp only [Matrix.mul_assoc, A, List.prod_cons]
by_cases h : n' = i
· have hni : n = i := by
cases i
simp only [n', Fin.mk_eq_mk] at h
simp [h]
simp only [h, transvection_mul_apply_same, IH, ← hni, add_le_iff_nonpos_right,
listTransvecCol_mul_last_row_drop _ _ hn]
field_simp [hM]
· have hni : n ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
cases i
simp [n'] at h
simp only [ne_eq, inl.injEq, Ne.symm h, not_false_eq_true, transvection_mul_apply_of_ne]
rw [IH]
rcases le_or_lt (n + 1) i with (hi | hi)
· simp only [hi, n.le_succ.trans hi, if_true]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· simpa only [hni.symm, not_le, or_false] using Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi
· simpa only [not_le] using hi
| self =>
simp only [length_listTransvecCol, le_refl, List.drop_eq_nil_of_le, List.prod_nil,
Matrix.one_mul]
rw [if_neg]
simpa only [not_le] using i.2
/-- Multiplying by some of the matrices in `listTransvecRow M` does not change the last column. -/
theorem mul_listTransvecRow_last_col_take (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ r) :
(M * ((listTransvecRow M).take k).prod) i (inr unit) = M i (inr unit) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp only [Matrix.mul_one, List.take_zero, List.prod_nil, List.take, Matrix.mul_one]
| succ k IH =>
have hkr : k < r := hk
let k' : Fin r := ⟨k, hkr⟩
have :
(listTransvecRow M)[k]? =
↑(transvection (inr Unit.unit) (inl k')
(-M (inr Unit.unit) (inl k') / M (inr Unit.unit) (inr Unit.unit))) := by
simp only [k', listTransvecRow, List.ofFnNthVal, hkr, dif_pos, List.getElem?_ofFn]
simp only [List.take_succ, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, this, List.prod_append, Matrix.mul_one,
List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, Option.toList_some]
rw [mul_transvection_apply_of_ne, IH hkr.le]
simp only [Ne, not_false_iff, reduceCtorEq]
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecRow M` does not change the last column. -/
theorem mul_listTransvecRow_last_col (i : Fin r ⊕ Unit) :
(M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) i (inr unit) = M i (inr unit) := by
have A : (listTransvecRow M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecRow]
rw [← List.take_length (l := listTransvecRow M), A]
simpa using mul_listTransvecRow_last_col_take M i le_rfl
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices in `listTransvecRow M` kills all the coefficients in the
last row but the last one. -/
theorem mul_listTransvecRow_last_row (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) (i : Fin r) :
(M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) (inr unit) (inl i) = 0 := by
suffices H :
∀ k : ℕ,
k ≤ r →
(M * ((listTransvecRow M).take k).prod) (inr unit) (inl i) =
if k ≤ i then M (inr unit) (inl i) else 0 by
have A : (listTransvecRow M).length = r := by simp [listTransvecRow]
rw [← List.take_length (l := listTransvecRow M), A]
have : ¬r ≤ i := by simp
simpa only [this, ite_eq_right_iff] using H r le_rfl
intro k hk
induction k with
| zero => simp only [if_true, Matrix.mul_one, List.take_zero, zero_le', List.prod_nil]
| succ n IH =>
have hnr : n < r := hk
let n' : Fin r := ⟨n, hnr⟩
have A :
(listTransvecRow M)[n]? =
↑(transvection (inr unit) (inl n')
(-M (inr unit) (inl n') / M (inr unit) (inr unit))) := by
simp only [n', listTransvecRow, List.ofFnNthVal, hnr, dif_pos, List.getElem?_ofFn]
simp only [List.take_succ, A, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, List.prod_append, Matrix.mul_one,
List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, Option.toList_some]
by_cases h : n' = i
· have hni : n = i := by
cases i
simp only [n', Fin.mk_eq_mk] at h
simp only [h]
have : ¬n.succ ≤ i := by simp only [← hni, n.lt_succ_self, not_le]
simp only [h, mul_transvection_apply_same, List.take, if_false,
mul_listTransvecRow_last_col_take _ _ hnr.le, hni.le, this, if_true, IH hnr.le]
field_simp [hM]
· have hni : n ≠ i := by
rintro rfl
cases i
tauto
simp only [IH hnr.le, Ne, mul_transvection_apply_of_ne, Ne.symm h, inl.injEq,
not_false_eq_true]
rcases le_or_lt (n + 1) i with (hi | hi)
· simp [hi, n.le_succ.trans hi, if_true]
· rw [if_neg, if_neg]
· simpa only [not_le] using hi
· simpa only [hni.symm, not_le, or_false] using Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices either in `listTransvecCol M` and `listTransvecRow M` kills
all the coefficients in the last row but the last one. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_col (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0)
(i : Fin r) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) (inr unit) (inl i) = 0 := by
have : listTransvecRow M = listTransvecRow ((listTransvecCol M).prod * M) := by
simp [listTransvecRow, listTransvecCol_mul_last_row]
rw [this]
apply mul_listTransvecRow_last_row
simpa [listTransvecCol_mul_last_row] using hM
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices either in `listTransvecCol M` and `listTransvecRow M` kills
all the coefficients in the last column but the last one. -/
theorem listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_row (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0)
(i : Fin r) :
((listTransvecCol M).prod * M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) (inl i) (inr unit) = 0 := by
have : listTransvecCol M = listTransvecCol (M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) := by
simp [listTransvecCol, mul_listTransvecRow_last_col]
rw [this, Matrix.mul_assoc]
apply listTransvecCol_mul_last_col
simpa [mul_listTransvecRow_last_col] using hM
/-- Multiplying by all the matrices either in `listTransvecCol M` and `listTransvecRow M` turns
the matrix in block-diagonal form. -/
theorem isTwoBlockDiagonal_listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow
(hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) :
IsTwoBlockDiagonal ((listTransvecCol M).prod * M * (listTransvecRow M).prod) := by
constructor
· ext i j
have : j = unit := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
simp [toBlocks₁₂, this, listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_row M hM]
· ext i j
have : i = unit := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
simp [toBlocks₂₁, this, listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow_last_col M hM]
/-- There exist two lists of `TransvectionStruct` such that multiplying by them on the left and
on the right makes a matrix block-diagonal, when the last coefficient is nonzero. -/
theorem exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero (hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0) :
∃ L L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜),
IsTwoBlockDiagonal ((L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod) := by
let L : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
⟨inl i, inr unit, by simp, -M (inl i) (inr unit) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)⟩
let L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :=
List.ofFn fun i : Fin r =>
⟨inr unit, inl i, by simp, -M (inr unit) (inl i) / M (inr unit) (inr unit)⟩
refine ⟨L, L', ?_⟩
have A : L.map toMatrix = listTransvecCol M := by simp [L, listTransvecCol, Function.comp_def]
have B : L'.map toMatrix = listTransvecRow M := by simp [L', listTransvecRow, Function.comp_def]
rw [A, B]
exact isTwoBlockDiagonal_listTransvecCol_mul_mul_listTransvecRow M hM
/-- There exist two lists of `TransvectionStruct` such that multiplying by them on the left and
on the right makes a matrix block-diagonal. -/
theorem exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec
(M : Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :
∃ L L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜),
IsTwoBlockDiagonal ((L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod) := by
by_cases H : IsTwoBlockDiagonal M
· refine ⟨List.nil, List.nil, by simpa using H⟩
-- we have already proved this when the last coefficient is nonzero
by_cases hM : M (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0
· exact exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero M hM
-- when the last coefficient is zero but there is a nonzero coefficient on the last row or the
-- last column, we will first put this nonzero coefficient in last position, and then argue as
-- above.
push_neg at hM
simp only [not_and_or, IsTwoBlockDiagonal, toBlocks₁₂, toBlocks₂₁, ← Matrix.ext_iff] at H
have : ∃ i : Fin r, M (inl i) (inr unit) ≠ 0 ∨ M (inr unit) (inl i) ≠ 0 := by
rcases H with H | H
· contrapose! H
rintro i ⟨⟩
exact (H i).1
· contrapose! H
rintro ⟨⟩ j
exact (H j).2
rcases this with ⟨i, h | h⟩
· let M' := transvection (inr Unit.unit) (inl i) 1 * M
have hM' : M' (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0 := by simpa [M', hM]
rcases exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero M' hM' with ⟨L, L', hLL'⟩
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc] at hLL'
refine ⟨L ++ [⟨inr unit, inl i, by simp, 1⟩], L', ?_⟩
simp only [List.map_append, List.prod_append, Matrix.mul_one, toMatrix_mk, List.prod_cons,
List.prod_nil, List.map, Matrix.mul_assoc (L.map toMatrix).prod]
exact hLL'
· let M' := M * transvection (inl i) (inr unit) 1
have hM' : M' (inr unit) (inr unit) ≠ 0 := by simpa [M', hM]
rcases exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_of_ne_zero M' hM' with ⟨L, L', hLL'⟩
refine ⟨L, ⟨inl i, inr unit, by simp, 1⟩::L', ?_⟩
simp only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, toMatrix_mk, List.prod_cons, List.map]
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc (L.map toMatrix).prod]
exact hLL'
/-- Inductive step for the reduction: if one knows that any size `r` matrix can be reduced to
diagonal form by elementary operations, then one deduces it for matrices over `Fin r ⊕ Unit`. -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_induction
(IH :
∀ M : Matrix (Fin r) (Fin r) 𝕜,
∃ (L₀ L₀' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r) 𝕜)) (D₀ : Fin r → 𝕜),
(L₀.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L₀'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D₀)
(M : Matrix (Fin r ⊕ Unit) (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct (Fin r ⊕ Unit) 𝕜)) (D : Fin r ⊕ Unit → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
rcases exists_isTwoBlockDiagonal_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec M with ⟨L₁, L₁', hM⟩
let M' := (L₁.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L₁'.map toMatrix).prod
let M'' := toBlocks₁₁ M'
rcases IH M'' with ⟨L₀, L₀', D₀, h₀⟩
set c := M' (inr unit) (inr unit)
refine
⟨L₀.map (sumInl Unit) ++ L₁, L₁' ++ L₀'.map (sumInl Unit),
Sum.elim D₀ fun _ => M' (inr unit) (inr unit), ?_⟩
suffices (L₀.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl Unit)).prod * M' * (L₀'.map (toMatrix ∘ sumInl Unit)).prod =
diagonal (Sum.elim D₀ fun _ => c) by
simpa [M', c, Matrix.mul_assoc]
have : M' = fromBlocks M'' 0 0 (diagonal fun _ => c) := by
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks M', hM.1, hM.2]
rfl
rw [this]
simp [h₀]
variable {n p} [Fintype n] [Fintype p]
/-- Reduction to diagonal form by elementary operations is invariant under reindexing. -/
theorem reindex_exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal (M : Matrix p p 𝕜)
(e : p ≃ n)
(H :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * Matrix.reindexAlgEquiv 𝕜 _ e M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod =
diagonal D) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct p 𝕜)) (D : p → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
rcases H with ⟨L₀, L₀', D₀, h₀⟩
refine ⟨L₀.map (reindexEquiv e.symm), L₀'.map (reindexEquiv e.symm), D₀ ∘ e, ?_⟩
have : M = reindexAlgEquiv 𝕜 _ e.symm (reindexAlgEquiv 𝕜 _ e M) := by
simp only [Equiv.symm_symm, submatrix_submatrix, reindex_apply, submatrix_id_id,
Equiv.symm_comp_self, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
rw [this]
simp only [toMatrix_reindexEquiv_prod, List.map_map, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
simp only [← reindexAlgEquiv_apply 𝕜, ← reindexAlgEquiv_mul, h₀]
simp only [Equiv.symm_symm, reindex_apply, submatrix_diagonal_equiv, reindexAlgEquiv_apply]
/-- Any matrix can be reduced to diagonal form by elementary operations. Formulated here on `Type 0`
because we will make an induction using `Fin r`.
See `exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal` for the general version (which follows
from this one and reindexing). -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_aux (n : Type) [Fintype n]
[DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix n n 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
suffices ∀ cn, Fintype.card n = cn →
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D by exact this _ rfl
intro cn hn
induction cn generalizing n M with
| zero =>
refine ⟨List.nil, List.nil, fun _ => 1, ?_⟩
ext i j
rw [Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hn
exact hn.elim' i
| succ r IH =>
have e : n ≃ Fin r ⊕ Unit := by
refine Fintype.equivOfCardEq ?_
rw [hn]
rw [@Fintype.card_sum (Fin r) Unit _ _]
simp
apply reindex_exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal M e
apply
exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_induction fun N =>
IH (Fin r) N (by simp)
/-- Any matrix can be reduced to diagonal form by elementary operations. -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal (M : Matrix n n 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
(L.map toMatrix).prod * M * (L'.map toMatrix).prod = diagonal D := by
have e : n ≃ Fin (Fintype.card n) := Fintype.equivOfCardEq (by simp)
apply reindex_exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal M e
apply exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal_aux
/-- Any matrix can be written as the product of transvections, a diagonal matrix, and
transvections. -/
theorem exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec (M : Matrix n n 𝕜) :
∃ (L L' : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (D : n → 𝕜),
M = (L.map toMatrix).prod * diagonal D * (L'.map toMatrix).prod := by
rcases exists_list_transvec_mul_mul_list_transvec_eq_diagonal M with ⟨L, L', D, h⟩
refine ⟨L.reverse.map TransvectionStruct.inv, L'.reverse.map TransvectionStruct.inv, D, ?_⟩
suffices
M =
(L.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod * (L.map toMatrix).prod * M *
((L'.map toMatrix).prod * (L'.reverse.map (toMatrix ∘ TransvectionStruct.inv)).prod)
by simpa [← h, Matrix.mul_assoc]
rw [reverse_inv_prod_mul_prod, prod_mul_reverse_inv_prod, Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one]
end Pivot
open Pivot TransvectionStruct
variable {n} [Fintype n]
/-- Induction principle for matrices based on transvections: if a property is true for all diagonal
matrices, all transvections, and is stable under product, then it is true for all matrices. This is
the useful way to say that matrices are generated by diagonal matrices and transvections.
We state a slightly more general version: to prove a property for a matrix `M`, it suffices to
assume that the diagonal matrices we consider have the same determinant as `M`. This is useful to
obtain similar principles for `SLₙ` or `GLₙ`. -/
theorem diagonal_transvection_induction (P : Matrix n n 𝕜 → Prop) (M : Matrix n n 𝕜)
(hdiag : ∀ D : n → 𝕜, det (diagonal D) = det M → P (diagonal D))
(htransvec : ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n 𝕜, P t.toMatrix) (hmul : ∀ A B, P A → P B → P (A * B)) :
P M := by
rcases exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec M with ⟨L, L', D, h⟩
have PD : P (diagonal D) := hdiag D (by simp [h])
suffices H :
∀ (L₁ L₂ : List (TransvectionStruct n 𝕜)) (E : Matrix n n 𝕜),
P E → P ((L₁.map toMatrix).prod * E * (L₂.map toMatrix).prod) by
rw [h]
apply H L L'
exact PD
intro L₁ L₂ E PE
induction L₁ with
| nil =>
simp only [Matrix.one_mul, List.prod_nil, List.map]
induction L₂ generalizing E with
| nil => simpa
| cons t L₂ IH =>
simp only [← Matrix.mul_assoc, List.prod_cons, List.map]
apply IH
| exact hmul _ _ PE (htransvec _)
| cons t L₁ IH =>
simp only [Matrix.mul_assoc, List.prod_cons, List.map] at IH ⊢
exact hmul _ _ (htransvec _) IH
/-- Induction principle for invertible matrices based on transvections: if a property is true for
all invertible diagonal matrices, all transvections, and is stable under product of invertible
matrices, then it is true for all invertible matrices. This is the useful way to say that
invertible matrices are generated by invertible diagonal matrices and transvections. -/
theorem diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero (P : Matrix n n 𝕜 → Prop) (M : Matrix n n 𝕜)
(hMdet : det M ≠ 0) (hdiag : ∀ D : n → 𝕜, det (diagonal D) ≠ 0 → P (diagonal D))
(htransvec : ∀ t : TransvectionStruct n 𝕜, P t.toMatrix)
(hmul : ∀ A B, det A ≠ 0 → det B ≠ 0 → P A → P B → P (A * B)) : P M := by
let Q : Matrix n n 𝕜 → Prop := fun N => det N ≠ 0 ∧ P N
have : Q M := by
apply diagonal_transvection_induction Q M
· intro D hD
have detD : det (diagonal D) ≠ 0 := by
rw [hD]
exact hMdet
exact ⟨detD, hdiag _ detD⟩
· intro t
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Transvection.lean | 719 | 740 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Adam Topaz, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeMonoid.UniqueProds
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.NoZeroDivisors
/-!
# Free Algebras
Given a commutative semiring `R`, and a type `X`, we construct the free unital, associative
`R`-algebra on `X`.
## Notation
1. `FreeAlgebra R X` is the free algebra itself. It is endowed with an `R`-algebra structure.
2. `FreeAlgebra.ι R` is the function `X → FreeAlgebra R X`.
3. Given a function `f : X → A` to an R-algebra `A`, `lift R f` is the lift of `f` to an
`R`-algebra morphism `FreeAlgebra R X → A`.
## Theorems
1. `ι_comp_lift` states that the composition `(lift R f) ∘ (ι R)` is identical to `f`.
2. `lift_unique` states that whenever an R-algebra morphism `g : FreeAlgebra R X → A` is
given whose composition with `ι R` is `f`, then one has `g = lift R f`.
3. `hom_ext` is a variant of `lift_unique` in the form of an extensionality theorem.
4. `lift_comp_ι` is a combination of `ι_comp_lift` and `lift_unique`. It states that the lift
of the composition of an algebra morphism with `ι` is the algebra morphism itself.
5. `equivMonoidAlgebraFreeMonoid : FreeAlgebra R X ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra R (FreeMonoid X)`
6. An inductive principle `induction`.
## Implementation details
We construct the free algebra on `X` as a quotient of an inductive type `FreeAlgebra.Pre` by an
inductively defined relation `FreeAlgebra.Rel`. Explicitly, the construction involves three steps:
1. We construct an inductive type `FreeAlgebra.Pre R X`, the terms of which should be thought
of as representatives for the elements of `FreeAlgebra R X`.
It is the free type with maps from `R` and `X`, and with two binary operations `add` and `mul`.
2. We construct an inductive relation `FreeAlgebra.Rel R X` on `FreeAlgebra.Pre R X`.
This is the smallest relation for which the quotient is an `R`-algebra where addition resp.
multiplication are induced by `add` resp. `mul` from 1., and for which the map from `R` is the
structure map for the algebra.
3. The free algebra `FreeAlgebra R X` is the quotient of `FreeAlgebra.Pre R X` by
the relation `FreeAlgebra.Rel R X`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
variable (X : Type*)
namespace FreeAlgebra
/-- This inductive type is used to express representatives of the free algebra.
-/
inductive Pre
| of : X → Pre
| ofScalar : R → Pre
| add : Pre → Pre → Pre
| mul : Pre → Pre → Pre
namespace Pre
instance : Inhabited (Pre R X) := ⟨ofScalar 0⟩
-- Note: These instances are only used to simplify the notation.
/-- Coercion from `X` to `Pre R X`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def hasCoeGenerator : Coe X (Pre R X) := ⟨of⟩
/-- Coercion from `R` to `Pre R X`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def hasCoeSemiring : Coe R (Pre R X) := ⟨ofScalar⟩
/-- Multiplication in `Pre R X` defined as `Pre.mul`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def hasMul : Mul (Pre R X) := ⟨mul⟩
/-- Addition in `Pre R X` defined as `Pre.add`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def hasAdd : Add (Pre R X) := ⟨add⟩
/-- Zero in `Pre R X` defined as the image of `0` from `R`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def hasZero : Zero (Pre R X) := ⟨ofScalar 0⟩
/-- One in `Pre R X` defined as the image of `1` from `R`. Note: Used for notation only. -/
def hasOne : One (Pre R X) := ⟨ofScalar 1⟩
/-- Scalar multiplication defined as multiplication by the image of elements from `R`.
Note: Used for notation only.
-/
def hasSMul : SMul R (Pre R X) := ⟨fun r m ↦ mul (ofScalar r) m⟩
end Pre
attribute [local instance] Pre.hasCoeGenerator Pre.hasCoeSemiring Pre.hasMul Pre.hasAdd
Pre.hasZero Pre.hasOne Pre.hasSMul
/-- Given a function from `X` to an `R`-algebra `A`, `lift_fun` provides a lift of `f` to a function
from `Pre R X` to `A`. This is mainly used in the construction of `FreeAlgebra.lift`. -/
def liftFun {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : X → A) :
Pre R X → A
| .of t => f t
| .add a b => liftFun f a + liftFun f b
| .mul a b => liftFun f a * liftFun f b
| .ofScalar c => algebraMap _ _ c
/-- An inductively defined relation on `Pre R X` used to force the initial algebra structure on
the associated quotient.
-/
inductive Rel : Pre R X → Pre R X → Prop
-- force `ofScalar` to be a central semiring morphism
| add_scalar {r s : R} : Rel (↑(r + s)) (↑r + ↑s)
| mul_scalar {r s : R} : Rel (↑(r * s)) (↑r * ↑s)
| central_scalar {r : R} {a : Pre R X} : Rel (r * a) (a * r)
-- commutative additive semigroup
| add_assoc {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel (a + b + c) (a + (b + c))
| add_comm {a b : Pre R X} : Rel (a + b) (b + a)
| zero_add {a : Pre R X} : Rel (0 + a) a
-- multiplicative monoid
| mul_assoc {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel (a * b * c) (a * (b * c))
| one_mul {a : Pre R X} : Rel (1 * a) a
| mul_one {a : Pre R X} : Rel (a * 1) a
-- distributivity
| left_distrib {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel (a * (b + c)) (a * b + a * c)
| right_distrib {a b c : Pre R X} :
Rel ((a + b) * c) (a * c + b * c)
-- other relations needed for semiring
| zero_mul {a : Pre R X} : Rel (0 * a) 0
| mul_zero {a : Pre R X} : Rel (a * 0) 0
-- compatibility
| add_compat_left {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel a b → Rel (a + c) (b + c)
| add_compat_right {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel a b → Rel (c + a) (c + b)
| mul_compat_left {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel a b → Rel (a * c) (b * c)
| mul_compat_right {a b c : Pre R X} : Rel a b → Rel (c * a) (c * b)
end FreeAlgebra
/--
If `α` is a type, and `R` is a commutative semiring, then `FreeAlgebra R α` is the
free (unital, associative) `R`-algebra generated by `α`.
This is an `R`-algebra equipped with a function `FreeAlgebra.ι R : α → FreeAlgebra R α` which has
the following universal property: if `A` is any `R`-algebra, and `f : α → A` is any function,
then this function is the composite of `FreeAlgebra.ι R` and a unique `R`-algebra homomorphism
`FreeAlgebra.lift R f : FreeAlgebra R α →ₐ[R] A`.
A typical element of `FreeAlgebra R α` is an `R`-linear
combination of formal products of elements of `α`.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` and `a`, `b` are terms of type `R` then
`(3 * a * a) • (x * y * x) + (2 * b + 1) • (y * x) + (a * b * b + 3)` is a
"typical" element of `FreeAlgebra R α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAlgebra R α` is isomorphic to `R`, and if `α` has one term `t`
then `FreeAlgebra R α` is isomorphic to the polynomial ring `R[t]`.
If `α` has two or more terms then `FreeAlgebra R α` is not commutative.
One can think of `FreeAlgebra R α` as the free non-commutative polynomial ring
with coefficients in `R` and variables indexed by `α`.
-/
def FreeAlgebra :=
Quot (FreeAlgebra.Rel R X)
namespace FreeAlgebra
attribute [local instance] Pre.hasCoeGenerator Pre.hasCoeSemiring Pre.hasMul Pre.hasAdd
Pre.hasZero Pre.hasOne Pre.hasSMul
/-! Define the basic operations -/
instance instSMul {A} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] : SMul R (FreeAlgebra A X) where
smul r := Quot.map (HMul.hMul (algebraMap R A r : Pre A X)) fun _ _ ↦ Rel.mul_compat_right
instance instZero : Zero (FreeAlgebra R X) where zero := Quot.mk _ 0
instance instOne : One (FreeAlgebra R X) where one := Quot.mk _ 1
instance instAdd : Add (FreeAlgebra R X) where
add := Quot.map₂ HAdd.hAdd (fun _ _ _ ↦ Rel.add_compat_right) fun _ _ _ ↦ Rel.add_compat_left
instance instMul : Mul (FreeAlgebra R X) where
mul := Quot.map₂ HMul.hMul (fun _ _ _ ↦ Rel.mul_compat_right) fun _ _ _ ↦ Rel.mul_compat_left
-- `Quot.mk` is an implementation detail of `FreeAlgebra`, so this lemma is private
private theorem mk_mul (x y : Pre R X) :
Quot.mk (Rel R X) (x * y) = (HMul.hMul (self := instHMul (α := FreeAlgebra R X))
(Quot.mk (Rel R X) x) (Quot.mk (Rel R X) y)) :=
rfl
/-! Build the semiring structure. We do this one piece at a time as this is convenient for proving
the `nsmul` fields. -/
instance instMonoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero (FreeAlgebra R X) where
mul_assoc := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.mul_assoc
one := Quot.mk _ 1
one_mul := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.one_mul
mul_one := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.mul_one
zero_mul := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.zero_mul
mul_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.mul_zero
instance instDistrib : Distrib (FreeAlgebra R X) where
left_distrib := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.left_distrib
right_distrib := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.right_distrib
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (FreeAlgebra R X) where
add_assoc := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.add_assoc
zero_add := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.zero_add
add_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟩
change Quot.mk _ _ = _
rw [Quot.sound Rel.add_comm, Quot.sound Rel.zero_add]
add_comm := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.add_comm
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := by
rintro ⟨⟩
change Quot.mk _ (_ * _) = _
rw [map_zero]
exact Quot.sound Rel.zero_mul
nsmul_succ n := by
rintro ⟨a⟩
dsimp only [HSMul.hSMul, instSMul, Quot.map]
rw [map_add, map_one, mk_mul, mk_mul, ← add_one_mul (_ : FreeAlgebra R X)]
congr 1
exact Quot.sound Rel.add_scalar
instance : Semiring (FreeAlgebra R X) where
__ := instMonoidWithZero R X
__ := instAddCommMonoid R X
__ := instDistrib R X
natCast n := Quot.mk _ (n : R)
natCast_zero := by simp; rfl
natCast_succ n := by simpa using Quot.sound Rel.add_scalar
instance : Inhabited (FreeAlgebra R X) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAlgebra {A} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] : Algebra R (FreeAlgebra A X) where
algebraMap := ({
toFun := fun r => Quot.mk _ r
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Quot.sound Rel.mul_scalar
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := fun _ _ => Quot.sound Rel.add_scalar } : A →+* FreeAlgebra A X).comp
(algebraMap R A)
commutes' _ := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact Quot.sound Rel.central_scalar
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
-- verify there is no diamond at `default` transparency but we will need
-- `reducible_and_instances` which currently fails https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
variable (S : Type) [CommSemiring S] in
example : (Semiring.toNatAlgebra : Algebra ℕ (FreeAlgebra S X)) = instAlgebra _ _ := rfl
instance {R S A} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring A]
[SMul R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] :
IsScalarTower R S (FreeAlgebra A X) where
smul_assoc r s x := by
change algebraMap S A (r • s) • x = algebraMap R A _ • (algebraMap S A _ • x)
rw [← smul_assoc]
congr
simp only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_eq_mul]
rw [smul_assoc, ← smul_one_mul]
instance {R S A} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] :
SMulCommClass R S (FreeAlgebra A X) where
smul_comm r s x := smul_comm (algebraMap R A r) (algebraMap S A s) x
instance {S : Type*} [CommRing S] : Ring (FreeAlgebra S X) :=
Algebra.semiringToRing S
-- verify there is no diamond but we will need
-- `reducible_and_instances` which currently fails https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10906
variable (S : Type) [CommRing S] in
example : (Ring.toIntAlgebra _ : Algebra ℤ (FreeAlgebra S X)) = instAlgebra _ _ := rfl
variable {X}
/-- The canonical function `X → FreeAlgebra R X`.
-/
irreducible_def ι : X → FreeAlgebra R X := fun m ↦ Quot.mk _ m
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_eq_ι (m : X) : Quot.mk (FreeAlgebra.Rel R X) m = ι R m := by rw [ι_def]
variable {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- Internal definition used to define `lift` -/
private def liftAux (f : X → A) : FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] A where
toFun a :=
Quot.liftOn a (liftFun _ _ f) fun a b h ↦ by
induction h
· exact (algebraMap R A).map_add _ _
· exact (algebraMap R A).map_mul _ _
· apply Algebra.commutes
· change _ + _ + _ = _ + (_ + _)
rw [add_assoc]
· change _ + _ = _ + _
rw [add_comm]
· change algebraMap _ _ _ + liftFun R X f _ = liftFun R X f _
simp
· change _ * _ * _ = _ * (_ * _)
rw [mul_assoc]
· change algebraMap _ _ _ * liftFun R X f _ = liftFun R X f _
simp
· change liftFun R X f _ * algebraMap _ _ _ = liftFun R X f _
simp
· change _ * (_ + _) = _ * _ + _ * _
rw [left_distrib]
· change (_ + _) * _ = _ * _ + _ * _
rw [right_distrib]
· change algebraMap _ _ _ * _ = algebraMap _ _ _
simp
· change _ * algebraMap _ _ _ = algebraMap _ _ _
simp
repeat
change liftFun R X f _ + liftFun R X f _ = _
simp only [*]
rfl
repeat
change liftFun R X f _ * liftFun R X f _ = _
simp only [*]
rfl
map_one' := by
change algebraMap _ _ _ = _
simp
map_mul' := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
rfl
map_zero' := by
dsimp
change algebraMap _ _ _ = _
simp
map_add' := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
rfl
commutes' := by tauto
/-- Given a function `f : X → A` where `A` is an `R`-algebra, `lift R f` is the unique lift
of `f` to a morphism of `R`-algebras `FreeAlgebra R X → A`. -/
@[irreducible]
def lift : (X → A) ≃ (FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :=
{ toFun := liftAux R
invFun := fun F ↦ F ∘ ι R
left_inv := fun f ↦ by
ext
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ι_def]
rfl
right_inv := fun F ↦ by
ext t
rcases t with ⟨x⟩
induction x with
| of =>
change ((F : FreeAlgebra R X → A) ∘ ι R) _ = _
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ι_def]
| ofScalar x =>
change algebraMap _ _ x = F (algebraMap _ _ x)
rw [AlgHom.commutes F _]
| add a b ha hb =>
-- Porting note: it is necessary to declare fa and fb explicitly otherwise Lean refuses
-- to consider `Quot.mk (Rel R X) ·` as element of FreeAlgebra R X
let fa : FreeAlgebra R X := Quot.mk (Rel R X) a
let fb : FreeAlgebra R X := Quot.mk (Rel R X) b
change liftAux R (F ∘ ι R) (fa + fb) = F (fa + fb)
rw [map_add, map_add, ha, hb]
| mul a b ha hb =>
let fa : FreeAlgebra R X := Quot.mk (Rel R X) a
let fb : FreeAlgebra R X := Quot.mk (Rel R X) b
change liftAux R (F ∘ ι R) (fa * fb) = F (fa * fb)
rw [map_mul, map_mul, ha, hb] }
@[simp]
theorem liftAux_eq (f : X → A) : liftAux R f = lift R f := by
rw [lift]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] A) : (lift R).symm F = F ∘ ι R := by
rw [lift]
rfl
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift (f : X → A) : (lift R f : FreeAlgebra R X → A) ∘ ι R = f := by
ext
rw [Function.comp_apply, ι_def, lift]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply (f : X → A) (x) : lift R f (ι R x) = f x := by
rw [ι_def, lift]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_unique (f : X → A) (g : FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :
(g : FreeAlgebra R X → A) ∘ ι R = f ↔ g = lift R f := by
rw [← (lift R).symm_apply_eq, lift]
rfl
/-!
Since we have set the basic definitions as `@[Irreducible]`, from this point onwards one
should only use the universal properties of the free algebra, and consider the actual implementation
as a quotient of an inductive type as completely hidden. -/
-- Marking `FreeAlgebra` irreducible makes `Ring` instances inaccessible on quotients.
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/algebra.2Esemiring_to_ring.20breaks.20semimodule.20typeclass.20lookup/near/212580241
-- For now, we avoid this by not marking it irreducible.
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_ι (g : FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] A) :
lift R ((g : FreeAlgebra R X → A) ∘ ι R) = g := by
rw [← lift_symm_apply]
exact (lift R).apply_symm_apply g
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext {f g : FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] A}
(w : (f : FreeAlgebra R X → A) ∘ ι R = (g : FreeAlgebra R X → A) ∘ ι R) : f = g := by
rw [← lift_symm_apply, ← lift_symm_apply] at w
exact (lift R).symm.injective w
/-- The free algebra on `X` is "just" the monoid algebra on the free monoid on `X`.
This would be useful when constructing linear maps out of a free algebra,
for example.
-/
noncomputable def equivMonoidAlgebraFreeMonoid :
FreeAlgebra R X ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra R (FreeMonoid X) :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (lift R fun x ↦ (MonoidAlgebra.of R (FreeMonoid X)) (FreeMonoid.of x))
((MonoidAlgebra.lift R (FreeMonoid X) (FreeAlgebra R X)) (FreeMonoid.lift (ι R)))
(by
apply MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext; intro x
refine FreeMonoid.recOn x ?_ ?_
· simp
rfl
· intro x y ih
simp at ih
simp [ih])
(by
ext
simp)
/-- `FreeAlgebra R X` is nontrivial when `R` is. -/
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (FreeAlgebra R X) :=
equivMonoidAlgebraFreeMonoid.surjective.nontrivial
/-- `FreeAlgebra R X` has no zero-divisors when `R` has no zero-divisors. -/
instance instNoZeroDivisors [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (FreeAlgebra R X) :=
equivMonoidAlgebraFreeMonoid.toMulEquiv.noZeroDivisors
/-- `FreeAlgebra R X` is a domain when `R` is an integral domain. -/
instance instIsDomain {R X} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : IsDomain (FreeAlgebra R X) :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
section
/-- The left-inverse of `algebraMap`. -/
def algebraMapInv : FreeAlgebra R X →ₐ[R] R :=
lift R (0 : X → R)
theorem algebraMap_leftInverse :
Function.LeftInverse algebraMapInv (algebraMap R <| FreeAlgebra R X) := fun x ↦ by
simp [algebraMapInv]
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_inj (x y : R) :
algebraMap R (FreeAlgebra R X) x = algebraMap R (FreeAlgebra R X) y ↔ x = y :=
algebraMap_leftInverse.injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq_zero_iff (x : R) : algebraMap R (FreeAlgebra R X) x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
| map_eq_zero_iff (algebraMap _ _) algebraMap_leftInverse.injective
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/FreeAlgebra.lean | 494 | 496 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Felix Weilacher. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.PiNat
/-!
# (Topological) Schemes and their induced maps
In topology, and especially descriptive set theory, one often constructs functions `(ℕ → β) → α`,
where α is some topological space and β is a discrete space, as an appropriate limit of some map
`List β → Set α`. We call the latter type of map a "`β`-scheme on `α`".
This file develops the basic, abstract theory of these schemes and the functions they induce.
## Main Definitions
* `CantorScheme.inducedMap A` : The aforementioned "limit" of a scheme `A : List β → Set α`.
This is a partial function from `ℕ → β` to `a`,
implemented here as an object of type `Σ s : Set (ℕ → β), s → α`.
That is, `(inducedMap A).1` is the domain and `(inducedMap A).2` is the function.
## Implementation Notes
We consider end-appending to be the fundamental way to build lists (say on `β`) inductively,
as this interacts better with the topology on `ℕ → β`.
As a result, functions like `List.get?` or `Stream'.take` do not have their intended meaning
in this file. See instead `PiNat.res`.
## References
* [kechris1995] (Chapters 6-7)
## Tags
scheme, cantor scheme, lusin scheme, approximation.
-/
namespace CantorScheme
open List Function Filter Set PiNat Topology
variable {β α : Type*} (A : List β → Set α)
/-- From a `β`-scheme on `α` `A`, we define a partial function from `(ℕ → β)` to `α`
which sends each infinite sequence `x` to an element of the intersection along the
branch corresponding to `x`, if it exists.
We call this the map induced by the scheme. -/
noncomputable def inducedMap : Σs : Set (ℕ → β), s → α :=
⟨fun x => Set.Nonempty (⋂ n : ℕ, A (res x n)), fun x => x.property.some⟩
section Topology
/-- A scheme is antitone if each set contains its children. -/
protected def Antitone : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, ∀ a : β, A (a :: l) ⊆ A l
/-- A useful strengthening of being antitone is to require that each set contains
the closure of each of its children. -/
def ClosureAntitone [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, ∀ a : β, closure (A (a :: l)) ⊆ A l
/-- A scheme is disjoint if the children of each set of pairwise disjoint. -/
protected def Disjoint : Prop :=
∀ l : List β, Pairwise fun a b => Disjoint (A (a :: l)) (A (b :: l))
variable {A}
/-- If `x` is in the domain of the induced map of a scheme `A`,
its image under this map is in each set along the corresponding branch. -/
theorem map_mem (x : (inducedMap A).1) (n : ℕ) : (inducedMap A).2 x ∈ A (res x n) := by
have := x.property.some_mem
rw [mem_iInter] at this
exact this n
protected theorem ClosureAntitone.antitone [TopologicalSpace α] (hA : ClosureAntitone A) :
CantorScheme.Antitone A := fun l a => subset_closure.trans (hA l a)
protected theorem Antitone.closureAntitone [TopologicalSpace α] (hanti : CantorScheme.Antitone A)
(hclosed : ∀ l, IsClosed (A l)) : ClosureAntitone A := fun _ _ =>
(hclosed _).closure_eq.subset.trans (hanti _ _)
/-- A scheme where the children of each set are pairwise disjoint induces an injective map. -/
theorem Disjoint.map_injective (hA : CantorScheme.Disjoint A) : Injective (inducedMap A).2 := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
refine Subtype.coe_injective (res_injective ?_)
dsimp
ext n : 1
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [res_succ, cons.injEq]
refine ⟨?_, ih⟩
contrapose hA
simp only [CantorScheme.Disjoint, _root_.Pairwise, Ne, not_forall, exists_prop]
refine ⟨res x n, _, _, hA, ?_⟩
rw [not_disjoint_iff]
refine ⟨(inducedMap A).2 ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← res_succ]
apply map_mem
rw [hxy, ih, ← res_succ]
apply map_mem
end Topology
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
/-- A scheme on a metric space has vanishing diameter if diameter approaches 0 along each branch. -/
def VanishingDiam : Prop :=
∀ x : ℕ → β, Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => EMetric.diam (A (res x n))) atTop (𝓝 0)
variable {A}
theorem VanishingDiam.dist_lt (hA : VanishingDiam A) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (x : ℕ → β) :
∃ n : ℕ, ∀ (y) (_ : y ∈ A (res x n)) (z) (_ : z ∈ A (res x n)), dist y z < ε := by
specialize hA x
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at hA
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hA (ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2)) (by
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]; linarith)
use n
intro y hy z hz
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos, ← edist_dist]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hy hz)
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (hn _ (le_refl _))
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos]
linarith
/-- A scheme with vanishing diameter along each branch induces a continuous map. -/
theorem VanishingDiam.map_continuous [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β]
(hA : VanishingDiam A) : Continuous (inducedMap A).2 := by
rw [Metric.continuous_iff']
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hA.dist_lt _ ε_pos x
rw [_root_.eventually_nhds_iff]
refine ⟨(↑)⁻¹' cylinder x n, ?_, ?_, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ hyx
rw [mem_preimage, Subtype.coe_mk, cylinder_eq_res, mem_setOf] at hyx
apply hn
· rw [← hyx]
apply map_mem
apply map_mem
apply continuous_subtype_val.isOpen_preimage
apply isOpen_cylinder
/-- A scheme on a complete space with vanishing diameter
such that each set contains the closure of its children
induces a total map. -/
theorem ClosureAntitone.map_of_vanishingDiam [CompleteSpace α] (hdiam : VanishingDiam A)
(hanti : ClosureAntitone A) (hnonempty : ∀ l, (A l).Nonempty) : (inducedMap A).1 = univ := by
rw [eq_univ_iff_forall]
intro x
choose u hu using fun n => hnonempty (res x n)
have umem : ∀ n m : ℕ, n ≤ m → u m ∈ A (res x n) := by
have : Antitone fun n : ℕ => A (res x n) := by
refine antitone_nat_of_succ_le ?_
intro n
apply hanti.antitone
intro n m hnm
exact this hnm (hu _)
have : CauchySeq u := by
rw [Metric.cauchySeq_iff]
intro ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hdiam.dist_lt _ ε_pos x
| use n
intro m₀ hm₀ m₁ hm₁
apply hn <;> apply umem <;> assumption
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete this
use y
rw [mem_iInter]
intro n
apply hanti _ (x n)
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto hy
rw [eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨n.succ, umem _⟩
end Metric
end CantorScheme
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/CantorScheme.lean | 168 | 194 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
/-!
# The derivative of a linear equivalence
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
continuous linear equivalences.
We also prove the usual formula for the derivative of the inverse function, assuming it exists.
The inverse function theorem is in `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/FDeriv.lean`.
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} {s : Set E} {c : F}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
| rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 95 | 101 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Unique
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Reflective
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
/-!
# Sheafification
Given a site `(C, J)` we define a typeclass `HasSheafify J A` saying that the inclusion functor from
`A`-valued sheaves on `C` to presheaves admits a left exact left adjoint (sheafification).
Note: to access the `HasSheafify` instance for suitable concrete categories, import the file
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.LeftExact`.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable (A : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} A]
/--
A proposition saying that the inclusion functor from sheaves to presheaves admits a left adjoint.
-/
abbrev HasWeakSheafify : Prop := (sheafToPresheaf J A).IsRightAdjoint
/--
`HasSheafify` means that the inclusion functor from sheaves to presheaves admits a left exact
left adjiont (sheafification).
Given a finite limit preserving functor `F : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A` and an adjunction
`adj : F ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A`, use `HasSheafify.mk'` to construct a `HasSheafify` instance.
-/
class HasSheafify : Prop where
isRightAdjoint : HasWeakSheafify J A
isLeftExact : PreservesFiniteLimits ((sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint)
instance [HasSheafify J A] : HasWeakSheafify J A := HasSheafify.isRightAdjoint
noncomputable section
instance [HasSheafify J A] : PreservesFiniteLimits ((sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint) :=
HasSheafify.isLeftExact
| theorem HasSheafify.mk' {F : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A} (adj : F ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A)
[PreservesFiniteLimits F] : HasSheafify J A where
isRightAdjoint := ⟨F, ⟨adj⟩⟩
isLeftExact := ⟨by
have : (sheafToPresheaf J A).IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
exact fun _ _ _ ↦ preservesLimitsOfShape_of_natIso
(adj.leftAdjointUniq (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint (sheafToPresheaf J A)))⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheafification.lean | 53 | 59 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Equiv
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.SeparationQuotient.Section
import Mathlib.Topology.Hom.ContinuousEvalConst
/-!
# Strong topologies on the space of continuous linear maps
In this file, we define the strong topologies on `E →L[𝕜] F` associated with a family
`𝔖 : Set (Set E)` to be the topology of uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖` (also called
the topology of `𝔖`-convergence).
The lemma `UniformOnFun.continuousSMul_of_image_bounded` tells us that this is a
vector space topology if the continuous linear image of any element of `𝔖` is bounded (in the sense
of `Bornology.IsVonNBounded`).
We then declare an instance for the case where `𝔖` is exactly the set of all bounded subsets of
`E`, giving us the so-called "topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets" (or "topology of
bounded convergence"), which coincides with the operator norm topology in the case of
`NormedSpace`s.
Other useful examples include the weak-* topology (when `𝔖` is the set of finite sets or the set
of singletons) and the topology of compact convergence (when `𝔖` is the set of relatively compact
sets).
## Main definitions
* `UniformConvergenceCLM` is a type synonym for `E →SL[σ] F` equipped with the `𝔖`-topology.
* `UniformConvergenceCLM.instTopologicalSpace` is the topology mentioned above for an arbitrary `𝔖`.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.topologicalSpace` is the topology of bounded convergence. This is
declared as an instance.
## Main statements
* `UniformConvergenceCLM.instIsTopologicalAddGroup` and
`UniformConvergenceCLM.instContinuousSMul` show that the strong topology
makes `E →L[𝕜] F` a topological vector space, with the assumptions on `𝔖` mentioned above.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.topologicalAddGroup` and
`ContinuousLinearMap.continuousSMul` register these facts as instances for the special
case of bounded convergence.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Topological Vector Spaces*][bourbaki1987]
## TODO
* Add convergence on compact subsets
## Tags
uniform convergence, bounded convergence
-/
open Bornology Filter Function Set Topology
open scoped UniformConvergence Uniformity
section General
/-! ### 𝔖-Topologies -/
variable {𝕜₁ 𝕜₂ : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜₁] [NormedField 𝕜₂] (σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂) {E F : Type*}
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜₁ E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable (F)
/-- Given `E` and `F` two topological vector spaces and `𝔖 : Set (Set E)`, then
`UniformConvergenceCLM σ F 𝔖` is a type synonym of `E →SL[σ] F` equipped with the "topology of
uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`".
If the continuous linear image of any element of `𝔖` is bounded, this makes `E →SL[σ] F` a
topological vector space. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def UniformConvergenceCLM [TopologicalSpace F] (_ : Set (Set E)) := E →SL[σ] F
namespace UniformConvergenceCLM
instance instFunLike [TopologicalSpace F] (𝔖 : Set (Set E)) :
FunLike (UniformConvergenceCLM σ F 𝔖) E F :=
ContinuousLinearMap.funLike
instance instContinuousSemilinearMapClass [TopologicalSpace F] (𝔖 : Set (Set E)) :
ContinuousSemilinearMapClass (UniformConvergenceCLM σ F 𝔖) σ E F :=
ContinuousLinearMap.continuousSemilinearMapClass
instance instTopologicalSpace [TopologicalSpace F] [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] (𝔖 : Set (Set E)) :
TopologicalSpace (UniformConvergenceCLM σ F 𝔖) :=
(@UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace E F (IsTopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace F) 𝔖).induced
(DFunLike.coe : (UniformConvergenceCLM σ F 𝔖) → (E →ᵤ[𝔖] F))
theorem topologicalSpace_eq [UniformSpace F] [IsUniformAddGroup F] (𝔖 : Set (Set E)) :
instTopologicalSpace σ F 𝔖 = TopologicalSpace.induced (UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖 ∘ DFunLike.coe)
(UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace E F 𝔖) := by
rw [instTopologicalSpace]
congr
exact IsUniformAddGroup.toUniformSpace_eq
/-- The uniform structure associated with `ContinuousLinearMap.strongTopology`. We make sure
that this has nice definitional properties. -/
instance instUniformSpace [UniformSpace F] [IsUniformAddGroup F]
(𝔖 : Set (Set E)) : UniformSpace (UniformConvergenceCLM σ F 𝔖) :=
UniformSpace.replaceTopology
((UniformOnFun.uniformSpace E F 𝔖).comap (UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖 ∘ DFunLike.coe))
(by rw [UniformConvergenceCLM.instTopologicalSpace, IsUniformAddGroup.toUniformSpace_eq]; rfl)
theorem uniformSpace_eq [UniformSpace F] [IsUniformAddGroup F] (𝔖 : Set (Set E)) :
instUniformSpace σ F 𝔖 =
| UniformSpace.comap (UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖 ∘ DFunLike.coe)
(UniformOnFun.uniformSpace E F 𝔖) := by
rw [instUniformSpace, UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/StrongTopology.lean | 113 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Christopher Hoskin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Christopher Hoskin
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ScottContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.UpperLowerSetTopology
/-!
# Scott topology
This file introduces the Scott topology on a preorder.
## Main definitions
- `DirSupInacc` - a set `u` is said to be inaccessible by directed joins if, when the least upper
bound of a directed set `d` lies in `u` then `d` has non-empty intersection with `u`.
- `DirSupClosed` - a set `s` is said to be closed under directed joins if, whenever a directed set
`d` has a least upper bound `a` and is a subset of `s` then `a` also lies in `s`.
- `Topology.scott` - the Scott topology is defined as the join of the topology of upper sets and the
Scott-Hausdorff topology (the topological space where a set `u` is open if, when the least upper
bound of a directed set `d` lies in `u` then there is a tail of `d` which is a subset of `u`).
## Main statements
- `Topology.IsScott.isUpperSet_of_isOpen`: Scott open sets are upper.
- `Topology.IsScott.isLowerSet_of_isClosed`: Scott closed sets are lower.
- `Topology.IsScott.monotone_of_continuous`: Functions continuous wrt the Scott topology are
monotone.
- `Topology.IsScott.scottContinuous_iff_continuous` - a function is Scott continuous (preserves
least upper bounds of directed sets) if and only if it is continuous wrt the Scott topology.
- `Topology.IsScott.instT0Space` - the Scott topology on a partial order is T₀.
## Implementation notes
A type synonym `WithScott` is introduced and for a preorder `α`, `WithScott α` is made an instance
of `TopologicalSpace` by the `scott` topology.
We define a mixin class `IsScott` for the class of types which are both a preorder and a
topology and where the topology is the `scott` topology. It is shown that `WithScott α` is an
instance of `IsScott`.
A class `Scott` is defined in `Topology/OmegaCompletePartialOrder` and made an instance of a
topological space by defining the open sets to be those which have characteristic functions which
are monotone and preserve limits of countable chains (`OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous'`).
A Scott continuous function between `OmegaCompletePartialOrder`s is always
`OmegaCompletePartialOrder.Continuous'` (`OmegaCompletePartialOrder.ScottContinuous.continuous'`).
The converse is true in some special cases, but not in general
([Domain Theory, 2.2.4][abramsky_gabbay_maibaum_1994]).
## References
* [Abramsky and Jung, *Domain Theory*][abramsky_gabbay_maibaum_1994]
* [Gierz et al, *A Compendium of Continuous Lattices*][GierzEtAl1980]
* [Karner, *Continuous monoids and semirings*][Karner2004]
## Tags
Scott topology, preorder
-/
open Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### Prerequisite order properties -/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {s t : Set α}
/-- A set `s` is said to be inaccessible by directed joins on `D` if, when the least upper bound of
a directed set `d` in `D` lies in `s` then `d` has non-empty intersection with `s`. -/
def DirSupInaccOn (D : Set (Set α)) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃d⦄, d ∈ D → d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → ∀ ⦃a⦄, IsLUB d a → a ∈ s → (d ∩ s).Nonempty
/-- A set `s` is said to be inaccessible by directed joins if, when the least upper bound of a
directed set `d` lies in `s` then `d` has non-empty intersection with `s`. -/
def DirSupInacc (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃d⦄, d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → ∀ ⦃a⦄, IsLUB d a → a ∈ s → (d ∩ s).Nonempty
@[simp] lemma dirSupInaccOn_univ : DirSupInaccOn univ s ↔ DirSupInacc s := by
simp [DirSupInaccOn, DirSupInacc]
@[simp] lemma DirSupInacc.dirSupInaccOn {D : Set (Set α)} :
DirSupInacc s → DirSupInaccOn D s := fun h _ _ d₂ d₃ _ hda => h d₂ d₃ hda
lemma DirSupInaccOn.mono {D₁ D₂ : Set (Set α)} (hD : D₁ ⊆ D₂) (hf : DirSupInaccOn D₂ s) :
DirSupInaccOn D₁ s := fun ⦃_⦄ a ↦ hf (hD a)
/--
A set `s` is said to be closed under directed joins if, whenever a directed set `d` has a least
upper bound `a` and is a subset of `s` then `a` also lies in `s`.
-/
def DirSupClosed (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃d⦄, d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → ∀ ⦃a⦄, IsLUB d a → d ⊆ s → a ∈ s
@[simp] lemma dirSupInacc_compl : DirSupInacc sᶜ ↔ DirSupClosed s := by
simp [DirSupInacc, DirSupClosed, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_imp_not,
disjoint_compl_right_iff]
@[simp] lemma dirSupClosed_compl : DirSupClosed sᶜ ↔ DirSupInacc s := by
rw [← dirSupInacc_compl, compl_compl]
alias ⟨DirSupInacc.of_compl, DirSupClosed.compl⟩ := dirSupInacc_compl
alias ⟨DirSupClosed.of_compl, DirSupInacc.compl⟩ := dirSupClosed_compl
lemma DirSupClosed.inter (hs : DirSupClosed s) (ht : DirSupClosed t) : DirSupClosed (s ∩ t) :=
fun _d hd hd' _a ha hds ↦ ⟨hs hd hd' ha <| hds.trans inter_subset_left,
ht hd hd' ha <| hds.trans inter_subset_right⟩
lemma DirSupInacc.union (hs : DirSupInacc s) (ht : DirSupInacc t) : DirSupInacc (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← dirSupClosed_compl, compl_union]; exact hs.compl.inter ht.compl
lemma IsUpperSet.dirSupClosed (hs : IsUpperSet s) : DirSupClosed s :=
fun _d ⟨_b, hb⟩ _ _a ha hds ↦ hs (ha.1 hb) <| hds hb
lemma IsLowerSet.dirSupInacc (hs : IsLowerSet s) : DirSupInacc s := hs.compl.dirSupClosed.of_compl
lemma dirSupClosed_Iic (a : α) : DirSupClosed (Iic a) := fun _d _ _ _a ha ↦ (isLUB_le_iff ha).2
end Preorder
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α] {s : Set α}
lemma dirSupInacc_iff_forall_sSup :
DirSupInacc s ↔ ∀ ⦃d⦄, d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → sSup d ∈ s → (d ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp [DirSupInacc, isLUB_iff_sSup_eq]
lemma dirSupClosed_iff_forall_sSup :
DirSupClosed s ↔ ∀ ⦃d⦄, d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → d ⊆ s → sSup d ∈ s := by
simp [DirSupClosed, isLUB_iff_sSup_eq]
end CompleteLattice
namespace Topology
/-! ### Scott-Hausdorff topology -/
section ScottHausdorff
/-- The Scott-Hausdorff topology.
A set `u` is open in the Scott-Hausdorff topology iff when the least upper bound of a directed set
`d` lies in `u` then there is a tail of `d` which is a subset of `u`. -/
def scottHausdorff (α : Type*) (D : Set (Set α)) [Preorder α] : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen u := ∀ ⦃d : Set α⦄, d ∈ D → d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, IsLUB d a →
a ∈ u → ∃ b ∈ d, Ici b ∩ d ⊆ u
isOpen_univ := fun d _ ⟨b, hb⟩ _ _ _ _ ↦ ⟨b, hb, (Ici b ∩ d).subset_univ⟩
isOpen_inter s t hs ht d hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ a hd₃ ha := by
obtain ⟨b₁, hb₁d, hb₁ds⟩ := hs hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ hd₃ ha.1
obtain ⟨b₂, hb₂d, hb₂dt⟩ := ht hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ hd₃ ha.2
obtain ⟨c, hcd, hc⟩ := hd₂ b₁ hb₁d b₂ hb₂d
exact ⟨c, hcd, fun e ⟨hce, hed⟩ ↦ ⟨hb₁ds ⟨hc.1.trans hce, hed⟩, hb₂dt ⟨hc.2.trans hce, hed⟩⟩⟩
isOpen_sUnion := fun s h d hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ a hd₃ ⟨s₀, hs₀s, has₀⟩ ↦ by
obtain ⟨b, hbd, hbds₀⟩ := h s₀ hs₀s hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ hd₃ has₀
exact ⟨b, hbd, Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset s s₀ hbds₀ hs₀s⟩
variable (α) (D : Set (Set α)) [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- Predicate for an ordered topological space to be equipped with its Scott-Hausdorff topology.
A set `u` is open in the Scott-Hausdorff topology iff when the least upper bound of a directed set
`d` lies in `u` then there is a tail of `d` which is a subset of `u`. -/
class IsScottHausdorff : Prop where
topology_eq_scottHausdorff : ‹TopologicalSpace α› = scottHausdorff α D
instance : @IsScottHausdorff α D _ (scottHausdorff α D) :=
@IsScottHausdorff.mk _ _ _ (scottHausdorff α D) rfl
namespace IsScottHausdorff
variable {s : Set α}
lemma topology_eq [IsScottHausdorff α D] : ‹_› = scottHausdorff α D := topology_eq_scottHausdorff
variable {α D}
lemma isOpen_iff [IsScottHausdorff α D] :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ ⦃d : Set α⦄, d ∈ D → d.Nonempty → DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) d → ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, IsLUB d a →
a ∈ s → ∃ b ∈ d, Ici b ∩ d ⊆ s := by
simp [topology_eq_scottHausdorff (α := α) (D := D), IsOpen, scottHausdorff]
lemma dirSupInaccOn_of_isOpen [IsScottHausdorff α D] (h : IsOpen s) : DirSupInaccOn D s :=
fun d hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ a hda hd₃ ↦ by
obtain ⟨b, hbd, hb⟩ := isOpen_iff.mp h hd₀ hd₁ hd₂ hda hd₃; exact ⟨b, hbd, hb ⟨le_rfl, hbd⟩⟩
lemma dirSupClosed_of_isClosed [IsScottHausdorff α univ] (h : IsClosed s) : DirSupClosed s := by
apply DirSupInacc.of_compl
rw [← dirSupInaccOn_univ]
exact (dirSupInaccOn_of_isOpen h.isOpen_compl)
end IsScottHausdorff
end ScottHausdorff
section ScottHausdorff
namespace IsScottHausdorff
variable {s : Set α} [Preorder α] {t : TopologicalSpace α} [IsScottHausdorff α univ]
lemma isOpen_of_isLowerSet (h : IsLowerSet s) : IsOpen s :=
(isOpen_iff (D := univ)).2 fun _d _ ⟨b, hb⟩ _ _ hda ha ↦
⟨b, hb, fun _ hc ↦ h (mem_upperBounds.1 hda.1 _ hc.2) ha⟩
lemma isClosed_of_isUpperSet (h : IsUpperSet s) : IsClosed s :=
isOpen_compl_iff.1 <| isOpen_of_isLowerSet h.compl
end IsScottHausdorff
end ScottHausdorff
/-! ### Scott topology -/
section Scott
section Preorder
/-- The Scott topology.
It is defined as the join of the topology of upper sets and the Scott-Hausdorff topology. -/
def scott (α : Type*) (D : Set (Set α)) [Preorder α] : TopologicalSpace α :=
upperSet α ⊔ scottHausdorff α D
lemma upperSet_le_scott [Preorder α] : upperSet α ≤ scott α univ := le_sup_left
lemma scottHausdorff_le_scott [Preorder α] : scottHausdorff α univ ≤ scott α univ:= le_sup_right
variable (α) (D) [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- Predicate for an ordered topological space to be equipped with its Scott topology.
The Scott topology is defined as the join of the topology of upper sets and the Scott Hausdorff
topology. -/
class IsScott : Prop where
topology_eq_scott : ‹TopologicalSpace α› = scott α D
end Preorder
namespace IsScott
section Preorder
variable (α) (D) [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
|
lemma topology_eq [IsScott α D] : ‹_› = scott α D := topology_eq_scott
variable {α} {D} {s : Set α} {a : α}
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/ScottTopology.lean | 239 | 243 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
exact disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (le_sdiff_right.1 <| inf_le_of_left_le h).le
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_right : b ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, le_symmDiff_iff_left, disjoint_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_left :
a ∆ b ∆ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ b \ c ⊔ c \ a ∆ b := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ (c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ c ⊓ a ⊓ b) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (c ⊓ a ⊓ b), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_right :
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ b ∆ c ⊔ b ∆ c \ a := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ (b \ (c ⊔ a) ⊔ c \ (b ⊔ a)) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (a ⊓ b ⊓ c), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_assoc : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ (b ∆ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_symmDiff_left, symmDiff_symmDiff_right]
instance symmDiff_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_assoc⟩
theorem symmDiff_left_comm : a ∆ (b ∆ c) = b ∆ (a ∆ c) := by
simp_rw [← symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_right_comm : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ c ∆ b := by simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b ∆ (c ∆ d) = a ∆ c ∆ (b ∆ d) := by
simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left : a ∆ (a ∆ b) = b := by simp [← symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right : b ∆ a ∆ a = b := by simp [symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_self' : a ∆ b ∆ a = b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left]
theorem symmDiff_left_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (· ∆ a) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right _
theorem symmDiff_right_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (a ∆ ·) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left _
theorem symmDiff_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_left_involutive a)
theorem symmDiff_right_injective (a : α) : Injective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_left_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_left_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_right_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
variable {a b c}
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_left_inj : a ∆ b = c ∆ b ↔ a = c :=
(symmDiff_left_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_right_inj : a ∆ b = a ∆ c ↔ b = c :=
(symmDiff_right_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_left : a ∆ b = a ↔ b = ⊥ :=
calc
a ∆ b = a ↔ a ∆ b = a ∆ ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_bot]
_ ↔ b = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_right : a ∆ b = b ↔ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_eq_left]
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_left (ha : Disjoint a c) (hb : Disjoint b c) :
Disjoint (a ∆ b) c := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact (ha.sup_left hb).disjoint_sdiff_left
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_right (ha : Disjoint a b) (hb : Disjoint a c) :
Disjoint a (b ∆ c) :=
(ha.symm.symmDiff_left hb.symm).symm
theorem symmDiff_eq_iff_sdiff_eq (ha : a ≤ c) : a ∆ b = c ↔ c \ a = b := by
rw [← symmDiff_of_le ha]
exact ((symmDiff_right_involutive a).toPerm _).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.trans eq_comm
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
/-! `CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` isn't actually a typeclass, but the lemmas in here are dual to
the `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` ones -/
section CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp_bihimp : a ⇔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b :=
@sup_sdiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_bihimp_sup : Codisjoint (a ⇔ b) (a ⊔ b) :=
@disjoint_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_left : a ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_right : b ⇨ a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_left : a ⇔ b ⇨ a = a ⊔ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_right : a ⇔ b ⇨ b = a ⊔ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
@symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_le_iff_left : a ⇔ b ≤ a ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
@le_symmDiff_iff_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_le_iff_right : a ⇔ b ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b :=
@le_symmDiff_iff_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_assoc : a ⇔ b ⇔ c = a ⇔ (b ⇔ c) :=
@symmDiff_assoc αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
instance bihimp_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_assoc⟩
theorem bihimp_left_comm : a ⇔ (b ⇔ c) = b ⇔ (a ⇔ c) := by simp_rw [← bihimp_assoc, bihimp_comm]
theorem bihimp_right_comm : a ⇔ b ⇔ c = a ⇔ c ⇔ b := by simp_rw [bihimp_assoc, bihimp_comm]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b ⇔ (c ⇔ d) = a ⇔ c ⇔ (b ⇔ d) := by
simp_rw [bihimp_assoc, bihimp_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_cancel_left : a ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = b := by simp [← bihimp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_cancel_right : b ⇔ a ⇔ a = b := by simp [bihimp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_self : a ⇔ b ⇔ a = b := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_bihimp_cancel_left]
theorem bihimp_left_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (· ⇔ a) :=
bihimp_bihimp_cancel_right _
theorem bihimp_right_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (a ⇔ ·) :=
bihimp_bihimp_cancel_left _
theorem bihimp_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (· ⇔ a) :=
@symmDiff_left_injective αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem bihimp_right_injective (a : α) : Injective (a ⇔ ·) :=
@symmDiff_right_injective αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem bihimp_left_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (· ⇔ a) :=
@symmDiff_left_surjective αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem bihimp_right_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (a ⇔ ·) :=
@symmDiff_right_surjective αᵒᵈ _ _
variable {a b c}
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_left_inj : a ⇔ b = c ⇔ b ↔ a = c :=
(bihimp_left_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_right_inj : a ⇔ b = a ⇔ c ↔ b = c :=
(bihimp_right_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_left : a ⇔ b = a ↔ b = ⊤ :=
@symmDiff_eq_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_right : a ⇔ b = b ↔ a = ⊤ :=
@symmDiff_eq_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
protected theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_left (ha : Codisjoint a c) (hb : Codisjoint b c) :
Codisjoint (a ⇔ b) c :=
(ha.inf_left hb).mono_left inf_le_bihimp
protected theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_right (ha : Codisjoint a b) (hb : Codisjoint a c) :
Codisjoint a (b ⇔ c) :=
(ha.inf_right hb).mono_right inf_le_bihimp
end CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
theorem symmDiff_eq : a ∆ b = a ⊓ bᶜ ⊔ b ⊓ aᶜ := by simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_eq]
theorem bihimp_eq : a ⇔ b = (a ⊔ bᶜ) ⊓ (b ⊔ aᶜ) := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), himp_eq]
theorem symmDiff_eq' : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) ⊓ (aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq, compl_inf]
theorem bihimp_eq' : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b ⊔ aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
@symmDiff_eq' αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem symmDiff_top : a ∆ ⊤ = aᶜ :=
symmDiff_top' _
theorem top_symmDiff : ⊤ ∆ a = aᶜ :=
top_symmDiff' _
@[simp]
theorem compl_symmDiff : (a ∆ b)ᶜ = a ⇔ b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, compl_sup_distrib, compl_sdiff, bihimp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp : (a ⇔ b)ᶜ = a ∆ b :=
@compl_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem compl_symmDiff_compl : aᶜ ∆ bᶜ = a ∆ b :=
(sup_comm _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [compl_sdiff_compl, sdiff_eq, symmDiff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_compl : aᶜ ⇔ bᶜ = a ⇔ b :=
@compl_symmDiff_compl αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_top : a ∆ b = ⊤ ↔ IsCompl a b := by
rw [symmDiff_eq', ← compl_inf, inf_eq_top_iff, compl_eq_top, isCompl_iff, disjoint_iff,
codisjoint_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_bot : a ⇔ b = ⊥ ↔ IsCompl a b := by
rw [bihimp_eq', ← compl_sup, sup_eq_bot_iff, compl_eq_bot, isCompl_iff, disjoint_iff,
codisjoint_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_symmDiff_self : aᶜ ∆ a = ⊤ :=
hnot_symmDiff_self _
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_compl_self : a ∆ aᶜ = ⊤ :=
symmDiff_hnot_self _
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_right' :
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ a ⊓ bᶜ ⊓ cᶜ ⊔ aᶜ ⊓ b ⊓ cᶜ ⊔ aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a ⊓ (b ⊓ c ⊔ bᶜ ⊓ cᶜ) ⊔ (b ⊓ cᶜ ⊔ c ⊓ bᶜ) ⊓ aᶜ := by
{ rw [symmDiff_eq, compl_symmDiff, bihimp_eq', symmDiff_eq] }
_ = a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ a ⊓ bᶜ ⊓ cᶜ ⊔ b ⊓ cᶜ ⊓ aᶜ ⊔ c ⊓ bᶜ ⊓ aᶜ := by
{ rw [inf_sup_left, inf_sup_right, ← sup_assoc, ← inf_assoc, ← inf_assoc] }
_ = a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ a ⊓ bᶜ ⊓ cᶜ ⊔ aᶜ ⊓ b ⊓ cᶜ ⊔ aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ ⊓ c := (by
congr 1
· congr 1
rw [inf_comm, inf_assoc]
· apply inf_left_right_swap)
variable {a b c}
theorem Disjoint.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : c ≤ a ∆ c ⊔ b ∆ c := by
trans c \ (a ⊓ b)
· rw [h.eq_bot, sdiff_bot]
· rw [sdiff_inf]
exact sup_le_sup le_sup_right le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_right (h : Disjoint b c) : a ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ a ∆ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff_comm a]
exact h.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_left
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_inf_bihimp_le_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ c ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ c :=
h.dual.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_left
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_inf_bihimp_le_right (h : Codisjoint b c) : a ⇔ b ⊓ a ⇔ c ≤ a :=
h.dual.le_symmDiff_sup_symmDiff_right
end BooleanAlgebra
/-! ### Prod -/
section Prod
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_fst [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β]
(a b : α × β) : (a ∆ b).1 = a.1 ∆ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_snd [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β]
(a b : α × β) : (a ∆ b).2 = a.2 ∆ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_fst [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] (a b : α × β) :
(a ⇔ b).1 = a.1 ⇔ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_snd [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] (a b : α × β) :
(a ⇔ b).2 = a.2 ⇔ b.2 :=
rfl
end Prod
/-! ### Pi -/
namespace Pi
theorem symmDiff_def [∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) :
a ∆ b = fun i => a i ∆ b i :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) :
a ⇔ b = fun i => a i ⇔ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_apply [∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) :
(a ∆ b) i = a i ∆ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_apply [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) :
(a ⇔ b) i = a i ⇔ b i :=
rfl
end Pi
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 739 | 740 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.BoundedVariation
/-!
# Almost everywhere differentiability of functions with locally bounded variation
In this file we show that a bounded variation function is differentiable almost everywhere.
This implies that Lipschitz functions from the real line into finite-dimensional vector space
are also differentiable almost everywhere.
## Main definitions and results
* `LocallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt` shows that a bounded variation
function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable almost everywhere.
* `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt` is the same result for Lipschitz functions.
We also give several variations around these results.
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
/-! ## -/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
namespace LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A bounded variation function into `ℝ` is differentiable almost everywhere. Superseded by
`ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {f : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
obtain ⟨p, q, hp, hq, rfl⟩ : ∃ p q, MonotoneOn p s ∧ MonotoneOn q s ∧ f = p - q :=
h.exists_monotoneOn_sub_monotoneOn
filter_upwards [hp.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem, hq.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with
x hxp hxq xs
exact (hxp xs).sub (hxq xs)
/-- A bounded variation function into a finite dimensional product vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. Superseded by `ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ℝ → ι → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
have A : ∀ i : ι, LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ι → ℝ => x i := fun i => LipschitzWith.eval i
have : ∀ i : ι, ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x : ℝ => f x i) s x := fun i ↦ by
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real
exact LipschitzWith.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn (A i) h
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx xs
exact differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => hx i xs
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ V).equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (A ∘ f) s x by
filter_upwards [H] with x hx xs
have : f = (A.symm ∘ A) ∘ f := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_comp_self, Function.id_comp]
rw [this]
exact A.symm.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x (hx xs)
apply ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_pi
exact A.lipschitz.comp_locallyBoundedVariationOn h
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. -/
theorem ae_differentiableWithinAt {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x := by
rw [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
exact h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space with bounded variation
is differentiable almost everywhere. -/
theorem ae_differentiableAt {f : ℝ → V} (h : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f univ) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
filter_upwards [h.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem] with x hx
rw [differentiableWithinAt_univ] at hx
exact hx (mem_univ _)
end LocallyBoundedVariationOn
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem`.
-/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) : ∀ᵐ x, x ∈ s → DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt_of_mem
/-- A real function into a finite dimensional real vector space which is Lipschitz on a set
is differentiable almost everywhere in this set. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.ae_differentiableWithinAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} {s : Set ℝ}
(h : LipschitzOnWith C f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict s, DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x :=
h.locallyBoundedVariationOn.ae_differentiableWithinAt hs
/-- A real Lipschitz function into a finite dimensional real vector space is differentiable
almost everywhere. For the general Rademacher theorem assuming
that the source space is finite dimensional, see `LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt`. -/
theorem LipschitzWith.ae_differentiableAt_real {C : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ → V} (h : LipschitzWith C f) :
∀ᵐ x, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
(h.locallyBoundedVariationOn univ).ae_differentiableAt
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 602 | 620 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Finite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Free
/-!
# Trace of a linear map
This file defines the trace of a linear map.
See also `LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Trace.lean` for the trace of a matrix.
## Tags
linear_map, trace, diagonal
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace LinearMap
open scoped Matrix
open Module TensorProduct
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] [Fintype κ]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R M)
/-- The trace of an endomorphism given a basis. -/
def traceAux : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
Matrix.traceLinearMap ι R R ∘ₗ ↑(LinearMap.toMatrix b b)
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
theorem traceAux_def (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
traceAux R b f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) :=
rfl
theorem traceAux_eq : traceAux R b = traceAux R c :=
LinearMap.ext fun f =>
calc
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) =
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b ((LinearMap.id.comp f).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.comp_id]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id * LinearMap.toMatrix c c f *
LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f * LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id *
LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.trace_mul_comm]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c ((f.comp LinearMap.id).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ b, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by rw [LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.comp_id]
variable (M) in
open Classical in
/-- Trace of an endomorphism independent of basis. -/
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then traceAux R H.choose_spec.some else 0
open Classical in
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `trace_eq_matrix_trace`. -/
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← traceAux_def]
congr 1
apply traceAux_eq
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
classical
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset R b.reindexFinsetRange, ← traceAux_def, ← traceAux_def,
traceAux_eq R b b.reindexFinsetRange]
theorem trace_mul_comm (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) := by
classical
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
· let ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, LinearMap.toMatrix_mul]
apply Matrix.trace_mul_comm
· rw [trace, dif_neg H, LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
lemma trace_mul_cycle (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * g * h) = trace R M (h * f * g) := by
rw [LinearMap.trace_mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
lemma trace_mul_cycle' (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * (g * h)) = trace R M (h * (f * g)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, LinearMap.trace_mul_comm]
/-- The trace of an endomorphism is invariant under conjugation -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj (g : M →ₗ[R] M) (f : (M →ₗ[R] M)ˣ) :
trace R M (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = trace R M g := by
rw [trace_mul_comm]
simp
@[simp]
lemma trace_lie {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f g : Module.End R M) :
trace R M ⁅f, g⁆ = 0 := by
rw [Ring.lie_def, map_sub, trace_mul_comm]
exact sub_self _
end
section
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (N P : Type*) [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P]
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- The trace of a linear map correspond to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M` -/
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
apply Basis.ext (Basis.tensorProduct (Basis.dualBasis b) b)
rintro ⟨i, j⟩
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Basis.tensorProduct_apply, Basis.coe_dualBasis, coe_comp]
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_dualTensorHom]
by_cases hij : i = j
· rw [hij]
simp
rw [Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero j i (1 : R) hij]
simp [Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij]
/-- The trace of a linear map corresponds to the contraction pairing under the isomorphism
`End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`. -/
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis' [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).symm.toLinearMap := by
simp [LinearEquiv.eq_comp_toLinearMap_symm, trace_eq_contract_of_basis b]
section
variable (R M)
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R N] [Module.Finite R N]
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map corresponds to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`. -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq_contract : LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
@[simp]
theorem trace_eq_contract_apply (x : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] M) :
(LinearMap.trace R M) ((dualTensorHom R M M) x) = contractLeft R M x := by
rw [← comp_apply, trace_eq_contract]
/-- When `M` is finite free, the trace of a linear map corresponds to the contraction pairing under
the isomorphism `End(M) ≃ M* ⊗ M`. -/
theorem trace_eq_contract' :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).symm.toLinearMap :=
trace_eq_contract_of_basis' (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module. -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_one : trace R M 1 = (finrank R M : R) := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
have b := Module.Free.chooseBasis R M
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_one, finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
simp
/-- The trace of the identity endomorphism is the dimension of the free module. -/
@[simp]
theorem trace_id : trace R M id = (finrank R M : R) := by rw [← Module.End.one_eq_id, trace_one]
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose : trace R (Module.Dual R M) ∘ₗ Module.Dual.transpose = trace R M := by
let e := dualTensorHomEquiv R M M
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext f m; simp [e]
theorem trace_prodMap :
trace R (M × N) ∘ₗ prodMapLinear R M N M N R =
(coprod id id : R × R →ₗ[R] R) ∘ₗ prodMap (trace R M) (trace R N) := by
let e := (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).prodCongr (dualTensorHomEquiv R N N)
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext
· simp only [dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.coe_prodCongr,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap, AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, restrictScalars_comp,
curry_apply, coe_comp, coe_restrictScalars, coe_inl, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply,
map_zero, prodMapLinear_apply, dualTensorHom_prodMap_zero, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, coe_fst, coprod_apply, id_coe, id_eq, add_zero, e]
· simp only [dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.coe_prodCongr,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap, AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, restrictScalars_comp,
curry_apply, coe_comp, coe_restrictScalars, coe_inr, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply,
map_zero, prodMapLinear_apply, zero_prodMap_dualTensorHom, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, coe_snd, coprod_apply, id_coe, id_eq, zero_add, e]
variable {R M N P}
theorem trace_prodMap' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M × N) (prodMap f g) = trace R M f + trace R N g := by
have h := LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (trace_prodMap R M N) (f, g)
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, coprod_apply, id_coe, id,
prodMapLinear_apply] at h
exact h
variable (R M N P)
open TensorProduct Function
theorem trace_tensorProduct : compr₂ (mapBilinear R M N M N) (trace R (M ⊗ N)) =
compl₁₂ (lsmul R R : R →ₗ[R] R →ₗ[R] R) (trace R M) (trace R N) := by
apply
(compl₁₂_inj (show Surjective (dualTensorHom R M M) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R M M).surjective)
(show Surjective (dualTensorHom R N N) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R N N).surjective)).1
ext f m g n
simp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, toFun_eq_coe, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, mapBilinear_apply,
trace_eq_contract_apply, contractLeft_apply, lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
map_dualTensorHom, dualDistrib_apply]
theorem trace_comp_comm :
compr₂ (llcomp R M N M) (trace R M) = compr₂ (llcomp R N M N).flip (trace R N) := by
apply
(compl₁₂_inj (show Surjective (dualTensorHom R N M) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R N M).surjective)
(show Surjective (dualTensorHom R M N) from (dualTensorHomEquiv R M N).surjective)).1
ext g m f n
simp only [AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply,
coe_restrictScalars, compl₁₂_apply, compr₂_apply, flip_apply, llcomp_apply',
comp_dualTensorHom, LinearMapClass.map_smul, trace_eq_contract_apply,
contractLeft_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem trace_transpose' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R _ (Module.Dual.transpose (R := R) f) = trace R M f := by
rw [← comp_apply, trace_transpose]
theorem trace_tensorProduct' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (g : N →ₗ[R] N) :
trace R (M ⊗ N) (map f g) = trace R M f * trace R N g := by
have h := LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (trace_tensorProduct R M N) f) g
simp only [compr₂_apply, mapBilinear_apply, compl₁₂_apply, lsmul_apply,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul] at h
exact h
theorem trace_comp_comm' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (g ∘ₗ f) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ g) := by
have h := LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (LinearMap.ext_iff.1 (trace_comp_comm R M N) g) f
simp only [llcomp_apply', compr₂_apply, flip_apply] at h
exact h
end
variable {N P}
variable [Module.Free R N] [Module.Finite R N] [Module.Free R P] [Module.Finite R P] in
lemma trace_comp_cycle (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : P →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R P (g ∘ₗ f ∘ₗ h) = trace R N (f ∘ₗ h ∘ₗ g) := by
rw [trace_comp_comm', comp_assoc]
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Module.Free R P] [Module.Finite R P] in
lemma trace_comp_cycle' (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : P →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R P ((g ∘ₗ f) ∘ₗ h) = trace R M ((h ∘ₗ g) ∘ₗ f) := by
rw [trace_comp_comm', ← comp_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj' (f : M →ₗ[R] M) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : trace R N (e.conj f) = trace R M f := by
classical
by_cases hM : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M)
· obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := hM
haveI := Module.Finite.of_basis b
haveI := (Module.free_def R M).mpr ⟨_, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI := Module.Finite.of_basis (b.map e)
haveI := (Module.free_def R N).mpr ⟨_, ⟨(b.map e).reindex (e.toEquiv.image _)⟩⟩
rw [e.conj_apply, trace_comp_comm', ← comp_assoc, LinearEquiv.comp_coe,
LinearEquiv.self_trans_symm, LinearEquiv.refl_toLinearMap, id_comp]
· rw [trace, trace, dif_neg hM, dif_neg ?_, zero_apply, zero_apply]
| rintro ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
exact hM ⟨s.image e.symm, ⟨(b.map e.symm).reindex
((e.symm.toEquiv.image s).trans (Equiv.setCongr Finset.coe_image.symm))⟩⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Trace.lean | 285 | 287 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Alex Meiburg
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Monomial
/-!
# Erase the leading term of a univariate polynomial
## Definition
* `eraseLead f`: the polynomial `f - leading term of f`
`eraseLead` serves as reduction step in an induction, shaving off one monomial from a polynomial.
The definition is set up so that it does not mention subtraction in the definition,
and thus works for polynomials over semirings as well as rings.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- `eraseLead f` for a polynomial `f` is the polynomial obtained by
subtracting from `f` the leading term of `f`. -/
def eraseLead (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.erase f.natDegree f
section EraseLead
theorem eraseLead_support (f : R[X]) : f.eraseLead.support = f.support.erase f.natDegree := by
simp only [eraseLead, support_erase]
theorem eraseLead_coeff (i : ℕ) :
f.eraseLead.coeff i = if i = f.natDegree then 0 else f.coeff i := by
simp only [eraseLead, coeff_erase]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_natDegree : f.eraseLead.coeff f.natDegree = 0 := by simp [eraseLead_coeff]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_of_ne (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ f.natDegree) : f.eraseLead.coeff i = f.coeff i := by
simp [eraseLead_coeff, hi]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_zero : eraseLead (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp only [eraseLead, erase_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (f.monomial_add_erase _)
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f.eraseLead :=
(eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff f)).symm
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_C_mul_X_pow {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f.eraseLead := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
theorem eraseLead_ne_zero (f0 : 2 ≤ #f.support) : eraseLead f ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, eraseLead_support]
exact
(zero_lt_one.trans_le <| (tsub_le_tsub_right f0 1).trans Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase).ne.symm
theorem lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a < f.natDegree := by
rw [eraseLead_support, mem_erase] at h
exact (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp a h.2).lt_of_ne h.1
theorem ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a ≠ f.natDegree :=
(lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h).ne
theorem natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support : f.natDegree ∉ (eraseLead f).support := fun h =>
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h rfl
theorem eraseLead_support_card_lt (h : f ≠ 0) : #(eraseLead f).support < #f.support := by
rw [eraseLead_support]
exact card_lt_card (erase_ssubset <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h)
theorem card_support_eraseLead_add_one (h : f ≠ 0) : #f.eraseLead.support + 1 = #f.support := by
set c := #f.support with hc
cases h₁ : c
case zero =>
by_contra
exact h (card_support_eq_zero.mp h₁)
case succ =>
rw [eraseLead_support, card_erase_of_mem (natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h), ← hc, h₁]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_support_eraseLead : #f.eraseLead.support = #f.support - 1 := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, eraseLead_zero, support_zero, card_empty]
· rw [← card_support_eraseLead_add_one hf, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eraseLead' {c : ℕ} (fc : #f.support = c + 1) :
#f.eraseLead.support = c := by
rw [card_support_eraseLead, fc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h₀ : f ≠ 0) (h₁ : f.eraseLead = 0) :
#f.support = 1 :=
(card_support_eq_zero.mpr h₁ ▸ card_support_eraseLead_add_one h₀).symm
theorem card_support_le_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : #f.support ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hpz : f = 0
case pos => simp [hpz]
case neg => exact le_of_eq (card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero hpz h)
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_monomial (i : ℕ) (r : R) : eraseLead (monomial i r) = 0 := by
classical
by_cases hr : r = 0
· subst r
simp only [monomial_zero_right, eraseLead_zero]
· rw [eraseLead, natDegree_monomial, if_neg hr, erase_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C (r : R) : eraseLead (C r) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X : eraseLead (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
eraseLead_monomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_X_pow (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (X ^ n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow (r : R) (n : ℕ) : eraseLead (C r * X ^ n) = 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_monomial]
@[simp] lemma eraseLead_C_mul_X (r : R) : eraseLead (C r * X) = 0 := by
simpa using eraseLead_C_mul_X_pow _ 1
theorem eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left {p q : R[X]} (pq : q.degree < p.degree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p.eraseLead + q := by
ext n
by_cases nd : n = p.natDegree
· rw [nd, eraseLead_coeff, if_pos (natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt pq).symm]
simpa using (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le pq degree_le_natDegree)).symm
· rw [eraseLead_coeff, coeff_add, coeff_add, eraseLead_coeff, if_neg, if_neg nd]
rintro rfl
exact nd (natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt pq)
theorem eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_left {p q : R[X]} (pq : q.natDegree < p.natDegree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p.eraseLead + q :=
eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left (degree_lt_degree pq)
theorem eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_right {p q : R[X]} (pq : p.degree < q.degree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p + q.eraseLead := by
ext n
by_cases nd : n = q.natDegree
· rw [nd, eraseLead_coeff, if_pos (natDegree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt pq).symm]
simpa using (coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le pq degree_le_natDegree)).symm
· rw [eraseLead_coeff, coeff_add, coeff_add, eraseLead_coeff, if_neg, if_neg nd]
rintro rfl
exact nd (natDegree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt pq)
theorem eraseLead_add_of_natDegree_lt_right {p q : R[X]} (pq : p.natDegree < q.natDegree) :
(p + q).eraseLead = p + q.eraseLead :=
eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_right (degree_lt_degree pq)
theorem eraseLead_degree_le : (eraseLead f).degree ≤ f.degree :=
f.degree_erase_le _
theorem degree_eraseLead_lt (hf : f ≠ 0) : (eraseLead f).degree < f.degree :=
f.degree_erase_lt hf
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux : (eraseLead f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree :=
natDegree_le_natDegree eraseLead_degree_le
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_lt (f0 : 2 ≤ #f.support) : (eraseLead f).natDegree < f.natDegree :=
lt_of_le_of_ne eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux <|
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support <|
natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero <| eraseLead_ne_zero f0
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eraseLead_ne_zero (h : f.eraseLead ≠ 0) : 0 < f.natDegree := by
by_contra h₂
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_not_pos h₂)] at h
simp at h
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero (f : R[X]) :
(eraseLead f).natDegree < f.natDegree ∨ f.eraseLead = 0 := by
by_cases h : #f.support ≤ 1
· right
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self h]
simp
· left
apply eraseLead_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge h)
theorem eraseLead_natDegree_le (f : R[X]) : (eraseLead f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree - 1 := by
rcases f.eraseLead_natDegree_lt_or_eraseLead_eq_zero with (h | h)
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h
· simp only [h, natDegree_zero, zero_le]
lemma natDegree_eraseLead (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) : f.eraseLead.natDegree = f.natDegree - 1 := by
have := natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
refine f.eraseLead_natDegree_le.antisymm <| le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ?_
rwa [eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self _ _).ne, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos]
all_goals positivity
lemma natDegree_eraseLead_add_one (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.natDegree + 1 = f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_eraseLead h, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_eraseLead_le_of_nextCoeff_eq_zero (h : f.nextCoeff = 0) :
f.eraseLead.natDegree ≤ f.natDegree - 2 := by
refine natDegree_le_pred (n := f.natDegree - 1) (eraseLead_natDegree_le f) ?_
rw [nextCoeff_eq_zero, natDegree_eq_zero] at h
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | ⟨hf, h⟩ := h
· simp
rw [eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self hf zero_lt_one).ne, ← nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos hf]
simp [nextCoeff_eq_zero, h, eq_zero_or_pos]
lemma two_le_natDegree_of_nextCoeff_eraseLead (hlead : f.eraseLead ≠ 0)
(hnext : f.nextCoeff = 0) : 2 ≤ f.natDegree := by
contrapose! hlead
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one, natDegree_eq_zero, natDegree_eq_one]
at hlead
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, ha, b, rfl⟩ := hlead
· simp
· rw [nextCoeff_C_mul_X_add_C ha] at hnext
subst b
simp
theorem leadingCoeff_eraseLead_eq_nextCoeff (h : f.nextCoeff ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.leadingCoeff = f.nextCoeff := by
have := natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero h
rw [leadingCoeff, nextCoeff, natDegree_eraseLead h, if_neg,
eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (tsub_lt_self _ _).ne]
all_goals positivity
theorem nextCoeff_eq_zero_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : f.nextCoeff = 0 := by
by_contra h₂
exact leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mp (leadingCoeff_eraseLead_eq_nextCoeff h₂ ▸ h₂) h
end EraseLead
/-- An induction lemma for polynomials. It takes a natural number `N` as a parameter, that is
required to be at least as big as the `nat_degree` of the polynomial. This is useful to prove
results where you want to change each term in a polynomial to something else depending on the
`nat_degree` of the polynomial itself and not on the specific `nat_degree` of each term. -/
theorem induction_with_natDegree_le (P : R[X] → Prop) (N : ℕ) (P_0 : P 0)
(P_C_mul_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ r : R, r ≠ 0 → n ≤ N → P (C r * X ^ n))
(P_C_add : ∀ f g : R[X], f.natDegree < g.natDegree → g.natDegree ≤ N → P f → P g → P (f + g)) :
∀ f : R[X], f.natDegree ≤ N → P f := by
intro f df
generalize hd : #f.support = c
revert f
induction' c with c hc
· intro f _ f0
convert P_0
simpa [support_eq_empty, card_eq_zero] using f0
· intro f df f0
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow f]
cases c
· convert P_C_mul_pow f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff ?_ df using 1
· convert zero_add (C (leadingCoeff f) * X ^ f.natDegree)
rw [← card_support_eq_zero, card_support_eraseLead' f0]
· rw [leadingCoeff_ne_zero, Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, f0]
exact zero_ne_one.symm
refine P_C_add f.eraseLead _ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine (eraseLead_natDegree_lt ?_).trans_le (le_of_eq ?_)
· exact (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.zero_le _))).trans f0.ge
· rw [natDegree_C_mul_X_pow _ _ (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr _)]
rintro rfl
simp at f0
| · exact (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le f.leadingCoeff f.natDegree).trans df
· exact hc _ (eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux.trans df) (card_support_eraseLead' f0)
· refine P_C_mul_pow _ _ ?_ df
rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← card_support_eq_zero, f0]
exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
/-- Let `φ : R[x] → S[x]` be an additive map, `k : ℕ` a bound, and `fu : ℕ → ℕ` a
"sufficiently monotone" map. Assume also that
* `φ` maps to `0` all monomials of degree less than `k`,
* `φ` maps each monomial `m` in `R[x]` to a polynomial `φ m` of degree `fu (deg m)`.
Then, `φ` maps each polynomial `p` in `R[x]` to a polynomial of degree `fu (deg p)`. -/
theorem mono_map_natDegree_eq {S F : Type*} [Semiring S]
[FunLike F R[X] S[X]] [AddMonoidHomClass F R[X] S[X]] {φ : F}
{p : R[X]} (k : ℕ) (fu : ℕ → ℕ) (fu0 : ∀ {n}, n ≤ k → fu n = 0)
(fc : ∀ {n m}, k ≤ n → n < m → fu n < fu m) (φ_k : ∀ {f : R[X]}, f.natDegree < k → φ f = 0)
(φ_mon_nat : ∀ n c, c ≠ 0 → (φ (monomial n c)).natDegree = fu n) :
(φ p).natDegree = fu p.natDegree := by
refine induction_with_natDegree_le (fun p => (φ p).natDegree = fu p.natDegree)
p.natDegree (by simp [fu0]) ?_ ?_ _ rfl.le
· intro n r r0 _
rw [natDegree_C_mul_X_pow _ _ r0, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, φ_mon_nat _ _ r0]
· intro f g fg _ fk gk
rw [natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt fg, map_add]
by_cases FG : k ≤ f.natDegree
· rw [natDegree_add_eq_right_of_natDegree_lt, gk]
rw [fk, gk]
exact fc FG fg
· cases k
· exact (FG (Nat.zero_le _)).elim
· rwa [φ_k (not_le.mp FG), zero_add]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/EraseLead.lean | 287 | 316 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, map_smul, hb']⟩
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun _ hb =>
span_induction (hx := hb) h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x _ hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
theorem isFractional_of_fg [IsLocalization S P] {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) :
IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
variable (S) in
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit (R := R) I h
variable (S P P')
variable [IsLocalization S P] [IsLocalization S P']
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun _ => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
| have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 277 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,531 | 1,532 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Joey van Langen, Casper Putz
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Characteristic of semirings
## Main definitions
* `CharP R p` expresses that the ring (additive monoid with one) `R` has characteristic `p`
* `ringChar`: the characteristic of a ring
* `ExpChar R p` expresses that the ring (additive monoid with one) `R` has
exponential characteristic `p` (which is `1` if `R` has characteristic 0, and `p` if it has
prime characteristic `p`)
-/
assert_not_exists Field Finset OrderHom
variable (R : Type*)
namespace CharP
section AddMonoidWithOne
variable [AddMonoidWithOne R] (p : ℕ)
/-- The generator of the kernel of the unique homomorphism ℕ → R for a semiring R.
*Warning*: for a semiring `R`, `CharP R 0` and `CharZero R` need not coincide.
* `CharP R 0` asks that only `0 : ℕ` maps to `0 : R` under the map `ℕ → R`;
* `CharZero R` requires an injection `ℕ ↪ R`.
For instance, endowing `{0, 1}` with addition given by `max` (i.e. `1` is absorbing), shows that
`CharZero {0, 1}` does not hold and yet `CharP {0, 1} 0` does.
This example is formalized in `Counterexamples/CharPZeroNeCharZero.lean`.
-/
@[mk_iff]
class _root_.CharP (R : Type*) [AddMonoidWithOne R] (p : semiOutParam ℕ) : Prop where
cast_eq_zero_iff (R p) : ∀ x : ℕ, (x : R) = 0 ↔ p ∣ x
variable [CharP R p] {a b : ℕ}
@[deprecated CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (since := "2025-04-03")]
lemma cast_eq_zero_iff' (R : Type*) [AddMonoidWithOne R] (p : ℕ) [CharP R p] (a : ℕ) :
(a : R) = 0 ↔ p ∣ a := cast_eq_zero_iff R p a
lemma _root_.CharP.ofNat_eq_zero' (p : ℕ) [CharP R p]
(a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] (h : p ∣ a) :
(ofNat(a) : R) = 0 := by
rwa [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p] at h
variable {R} in
lemma congr {q : ℕ} (h : p = q) : CharP R q := h ▸ ‹CharP R p›
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_zero : (p : R) = 0 := (cast_eq_zero_iff R p p).2 dvd_rfl
-- TODO: This lemma needs to be `@[simp]` for confluence in the presence of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` and
-- `Nat.cast_ofNat`, but with `no_index` on its entire LHS, it matches literally every expression so
-- is too expensive. If https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2867 is fixed in a performant way, this can be made `@[simp]`.
--
-- @[simp]
lemma ofNat_eq_zero [p.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(p) : R) = 0 := cast_eq_zero R p
lemma eq {p q : ℕ} (_hp : CharP R p) (_hq : CharP R q) : p = q :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm ((cast_eq_zero_iff R p q).1 (cast_eq_zero _ _))
((cast_eq_zero_iff R q p).1 (cast_eq_zero _ _))
instance ofCharZero [CharZero R] : CharP R 0 where
cast_eq_zero_iff x := by rw [zero_dvd_iff, ← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_inj]
end AddMonoidWithOne
section AddGroupWithOne
variable [AddGroupWithOne R] (p : ℕ) [CharP R p] {a b : ℤ}
lemma intCast_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ) : (a : R) = 0 ↔ (p : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with (h | rfl | h)
· rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_neg, ← Int.dvd_neg]
lift -a to ℕ using Int.neg_nonneg.mpr (le_of_lt h) with b
rw [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
· simp only [Int.cast_zero, eq_self_iff_true, Int.dvd_zero]
· lift a to ℕ using le_of_lt h with b
rw [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
lemma charP_to_charZero [CharP R 0] : CharZero R :=
charZero_of_inj_zero fun n h0 => eq_zero_of_zero_dvd ((cast_eq_zero_iff R 0 n).mp h0)
lemma charP_zero_iff_charZero : CharP R 0 ↔ CharZero R :=
⟨fun _ ↦ charP_to_charZero R, fun _ ↦ ofCharZero R⟩
end AddGroupWithOne
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
lemma «exists» : ∃ p, CharP R p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
by_cases
| (fun H : ∀ p : ℕ, (p : R) = 0 → p = 0 =>
⟨0, ⟨fun x => by rw [zero_dvd_iff]; exact ⟨H x, by rintro rfl; simp⟩⟩⟩)
fun H =>
⟨Nat.find (not_forall.1 H),
⟨fun x =>
⟨fun H1 =>
Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
(by_contradiction fun H2 =>
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/Defs.lean | 102 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Data.Option.NAry
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Basic
/-!
# `WithBot`, `WithTop`
Adding a `bot` or a `top` to an order.
## Main declarations
* `With<Top/Bot> α`: Equips `Option α` with the order on `α` plus `none` as the top/bottom element.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
namespace WithBot
variable {a b : α}
instance nontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (WithBot α) :=
Option.nontrivial
open Function
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : α → WithBot α) :=
Option.some_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (a : WithBot α) = b ↔ a = b :=
Option.some_inj
protected theorem «forall» {p : WithBot α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p ⊥ ∧ ∀ x : α, p x :=
Option.forall
protected theorem «exists» {p : WithBot α → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ p ⊥ ∨ ∃ x : α, p x :=
Option.exists
theorem none_eq_bot : (none : WithBot α) = (⊥ : WithBot α) :=
rfl
theorem some_eq_coe (a : α) : (Option.some a : WithBot α) = (↑a : WithBot α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_coe : ⊥ ≠ (a : WithBot α) :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_bot : (a : WithBot α) ≠ ⊥ :=
nofun
/-- Specialization of `Option.getD` to values in `WithBot α` that respects API boundaries.
-/
def unbotD (d : α) (x : WithBot α) : α :=
recBotCoe d id x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot' := unbotD
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_bot {α} (d : α) : unbotD d ⊥ = d :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_bot := unbotD_bot
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_coe {α} (d x : α) : unbotD d x = x :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_coe := unbotD_coe
theorem coe_eq_coe : (a : WithBot α) = b ↔ a = b := coe_inj
theorem unbotD_eq_iff {d y : α} {x : WithBot α} : unbotD d x = y ↔ x = y ∨ x = ⊥ ∧ y = d := by
induction x <;> simp [@eq_comm _ d]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_iff := unbotD_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem unbotD_eq_self_iff {d : α} {x : WithBot α} : unbotD d x = d ↔ x = d ∨ x = ⊥ := by
simp [unbotD_eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_self_iff := unbotD_eq_self_iff
theorem unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff {d : α} {x y : WithBot α} :
unbotD d x = unbotD d y ↔ x = y ∨ x = d ∧ y = ⊥ ∨ x = ⊥ ∧ y = d := by
induction y <;> simp [unbotD_eq_iff, or_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_eq_unbot'_iff := unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff
/-- Lift a map `f : α → β` to `WithBot α → WithBot β`. Implemented using `Option.map`. -/
def map (f : α → β) : WithBot α → WithBot β :=
Option.map f
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : α → β) : map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_eq_bot_iff {f : α → β} {a : WithBot α} :
map f a = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ := Option.map_eq_none_iff
theorem map_eq_some_iff {f : α → β} {y : β} {v : WithBot α} :
WithBot.map f v = .some y ↔ ∃ x, v = .some x ∧ f x = y := Option.map_eq_some_iff
theorem some_eq_map_iff {f : α → β} {y : β} {v : WithBot α} :
.some y = WithBot.map f v ↔ ∃ x, v = .some x ∧ f x = y := by
cases v <;> simp [eq_comm]
theorem map_comm {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {g₁ : β → δ} {g₂ : γ → δ}
(h : g₁ ∘ f₁ = g₂ ∘ f₂) (a : α) :
map g₁ (map f₁ a) = map g₂ (map f₂ a) :=
Option.map_comm h _
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function
`WithBot α → WithBot β → WithBot γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ : (α → β → γ) → WithBot α → WithBot β → WithBot γ := Option.map₂
lemma map₂_coe_coe (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = f a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_bot_left (f : α → β → γ) (b) : map₂ f ⊥ b = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_bot_right (f : α → β → γ) (a) : map₂ f a ⊥ = ⊥ := by cases a <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_coe_left (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (b) : map₂ f a b = b.map fun b ↦ f a b := rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_coe_right (f : α → β → γ) (a) (b : β) : map₂ f a b = a.map (f · b) := by
cases a <;> rfl
@[simp] lemma map₂_eq_bot_iff {f : α → β → γ} {a : WithBot α} {b : WithBot β} :
map₂ f a b = ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥ ∨ b = ⊥ := Option.map₂_eq_none_iff
lemma ne_bot_iff_exists {x : WithBot α} : x ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ a : α, ↑a = x := Option.ne_none_iff_exists
lemma eq_bot_iff_forall_ne {x : WithBot α} : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ a : α, ↑a ≠ x :=
Option.eq_none_iff_forall_some_ne
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-19")] alias forall_ne_iff_eq_bot := eq_bot_iff_forall_ne
/-- Deconstruct a `x : WithBot α` to the underlying value in `α`, given a proof that `x ≠ ⊥`. -/
def unbot : ∀ x : WithBot α, x ≠ ⊥ → α | (x : α), _ => x
@[simp] lemma coe_unbot : ∀ (x : WithBot α) hx, x.unbot hx = x | (x : α), _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem unbot_coe (x : α) (h : (x : WithBot α) ≠ ⊥ := coe_ne_bot) : (x : WithBot α).unbot h = x :=
rfl
instance canLift : CanLift (WithBot α) α (↑) fun r => r ≠ ⊥ where
prf x h := ⟨x.unbot h, coe_unbot _ _⟩
instance instTop [Top α] : Top (WithBot α) where
top := (⊤ : α)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_top [Top α] : ((⊤ : α) : WithBot α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_top [Top α] {a : α} : (a : WithBot α) = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ := coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma top_eq_coe [Top α] {a : α} : ⊤ = (a : WithBot α) ↔ ⊤ = a := coe_eq_coe
theorem unbot_eq_iff {a : WithBot α} {b : α} (h : a ≠ ⊥) :
a.unbot h = b ↔ a = b := by
induction a
· simpa using h rfl
· simp
theorem eq_unbot_iff {a : α} {b : WithBot α} (h : b ≠ ⊥) :
a = b.unbot h ↔ a = b := by
induction b
· simpa using h rfl
· simp
/-- The equivalence between the non-bottom elements of `WithBot α` and `α`. -/
@[simps] def _root_.Equiv.withBotSubtypeNe : {y : WithBot α // y ≠ ⊥} ≃ α where
toFun := fun ⟨x,h⟩ => WithBot.unbot x h
invFun x := ⟨x, WithBot.coe_ne_bot⟩
left_inv _ := by simp
right_inv _ := by simp
section LE
variable [LE α] {x y : WithBot α}
instance (priority := 10) le : LE (WithBot α) :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ => ∀ a : α, o₁ = ↑a → ∃ b : α, o₂ = ↑b ∧ a ≤ b⟩
lemma le_def : x ≤ y ↔ ∀ a : α, x = ↑a → ∃ b : α, y = ↑b ∧ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (a : WithBot α) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_def]
lemma not_coe_le_bot (a : α) : ¬(a : WithBot α) ≤ ⊥ := by simp [le_def]
instance orderBot : OrderBot (WithBot α) where bot_le := by simp [le_def]
instance orderTop [OrderTop α] : OrderTop (WithBot α) where le_top x := by cases x <;> simp [le_def]
instance instBoundedOrder [OrderTop α] : BoundedOrder (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.orderBot, WithBot.orderTop with }
/-- There is a general version `le_bot_iff`, but this lemma does not require a `PartialOrder`. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem le_bot_iff : ∀ {a : WithBot α}, a ≤ ⊥ ↔ a = ⊥
| (a : α) => by simp [not_coe_le_bot _]
| ⊥ => by simp
theorem coe_le : ∀ {o : Option α}, b ∈ o → ((a : WithBot α) ≤ o ↔ a ≤ b)
| _, rfl => coe_le_coe
theorem coe_le_iff : a ≤ x ↔ ∃ b : α, x = b ∧ a ≤ b := by simp [le_def]
theorem le_coe_iff : x ≤ b ↔ ∀ a : α, x = ↑a → a ≤ b := by simp [le_def]
protected theorem _root_.IsMax.withBot (h : IsMax a) : IsMax (a : WithBot α) :=
fun x ↦ by cases x <;> simp; simpa using @h _
lemma le_unbot_iff (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : a ≤ unbot y hy ↔ a ≤ y := by lift y to α using id hy; simp
lemma unbot_le_iff (hx : x ≠ ⊥) : unbot x hx ≤ b ↔ x ≤ b := by lift x to α using id hx; simp
lemma unbotD_le_iff (hx : x = ⊥ → a ≤ b) : x.unbotD a ≤ b ↔ x ≤ b := by cases x <;> simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_le_iff := unbotD_le_iff
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α] {x y : WithBot α}
instance (priority := 10) lt : LT (WithBot α) :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ : WithBot α => ∃ b : α, o₂ = ↑b ∧ ∀ a : α, o₁ = ↑a → a < b⟩
lemma lt_def : x < y ↔ ∃ b : α, y = ↑b ∧ ∀ a : α, x = ↑a → a < b := .rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (a : WithBot α) < b ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_def]
@[simp] lemma bot_lt_coe (a : α) : ⊥ < (a : WithBot α) := by simp [lt_def]
@[simp] protected lemma not_lt_bot (a : WithBot α) : ¬a < ⊥ := by simp [lt_def]
lemma lt_iff_exists_coe : x < y ↔ ∃ b : α, y = b ∧ x < b := by cases y <;> simp
lemma lt_coe_iff : x < b ↔ ∀ a : α, x = a → a < b := by simp [lt_def]
/-- A version of `bot_lt_iff_ne_bot` for `WithBot` that only requires `LT α`, not
`PartialOrder α`. -/
protected lemma bot_lt_iff_ne_bot : ⊥ < x ↔ x ≠ ⊥ := by cases x <;> simp
lemma lt_unbot_iff (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : a < unbot y hy ↔ a < y := by lift y to α using id hy; simp
lemma unbot_lt_iff (hx : x ≠ ⊥) : unbot x hx < b ↔ x < b := by lift x to α using id hx; simp
lemma unbotD_lt_iff (hx : x = ⊥ → a < b) : x.unbotD a < b ↔ x < b := by cases x <;> simp [hx]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias unbot'_lt_iff := unbotD_lt_iff
end LT
instance preorder [Preorder α] : Preorder (WithBot α) where
lt_iff_le_not_le x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl x := by cases x <;> simp [le_def]
le_trans x y z := by cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp [le_def]; simpa using le_trans
instance partialOrder [PartialOrder α] : PartialOrder (WithBot α) where
le_antisymm x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [le_def]; simpa using le_antisymm
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {x y : WithBot α}
theorem coe_strictMono : StrictMono (fun (a : α) => (a : WithBot α)) := fun _ _ => coe_lt_coe.2
theorem coe_mono : Monotone (fun (a : α) => (a : WithBot α)) := fun _ _ => coe_le_coe.2
theorem monotone_iff {f : WithBot α → β} :
Monotone f ↔ Monotone (fun a ↦ f a : α → β) ∧ ∀ x : α, f ⊥ ≤ f x :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.comp WithBot.coe_mono, fun _ ↦ h bot_le⟩, fun h ↦
WithBot.forall.2
⟨WithBot.forall.2 ⟨fun _ => le_rfl, fun x _ => h.2 x⟩, fun _ =>
WithBot.forall.2 ⟨fun h => (not_coe_le_bot _ h).elim,
fun _ hle => h.1 (coe_le_coe.1 hle)⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem monotone_map_iff {f : α → β} : Monotone (WithBot.map f) ↔ Monotone f :=
monotone_iff.trans <| by simp [Monotone]
alias ⟨_, _root_.Monotone.withBot_map⟩ := monotone_map_iff
theorem strictMono_iff {f : WithBot α → β} :
StrictMono f ↔ StrictMono (fun a => f a : α → β) ∧ ∀ x : α, f ⊥ < f x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.comp WithBot.coe_strictMono, fun _ => h (bot_lt_coe _)⟩, fun h =>
WithBot.forall.2
⟨WithBot.forall.2 ⟨flip absurd (lt_irrefl _), fun x _ => h.2 x⟩, fun _ =>
WithBot.forall.2 ⟨fun h => (not_lt_bot h).elim, fun _ hle => h.1 (coe_lt_coe.1 hle)⟩⟩⟩
theorem strictAnti_iff {f : WithBot α → β} :
StrictAnti f ↔ StrictAnti (fun a ↦ f a : α → β) ∧ ∀ x : α, f x < f ⊥ :=
strictMono_iff (β := βᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem strictMono_map_iff {f : α → β} :
StrictMono (WithBot.map f) ↔ StrictMono f :=
strictMono_iff.trans <| by simp [StrictMono, bot_lt_coe]
alias ⟨_, _root_.StrictMono.withBot_map⟩ := strictMono_map_iff
lemma map_le_iff (f : α → β) (mono_iff : ∀ {a b}, f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b) :
x.map f ≤ y.map f ↔ x ≤ y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [mono_iff]
theorem le_coe_unbotD (x : WithBot α) (b : α) : x ≤ x.unbotD b := by cases x <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias le_coe_unbot' := le_coe_unbotD
@[simp]
theorem lt_coe_bot [OrderBot α] : x < (⊥ : α) ↔ x = ⊥ := by cases x <;> simp
lemma eq_bot_iff_forall_lt : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b : α, x < b := by
cases x <;> simp; simpa using ⟨_, lt_irrefl _⟩
lemma eq_bot_iff_forall_le [NoBotOrder α] : x = ⊥ ↔ ∀ b : α, x ≤ b := by
refine ⟨by simp +contextual, fun h ↦ (x.eq_bot_iff_forall_ne).2 fun y => ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact not_isBot y fun z => coe_le_coe.1 (h z)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-19")] alias forall_lt_iff_eq_bot := eq_bot_iff_forall_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-19")] alias forall_le_iff_eq_bot := eq_bot_iff_forall_le
lemma forall_le_coe_iff_le [NoBotOrder α] : (∀ a : α, y ≤ a → x ≤ a) ↔ x ≤ y := by
obtain _ | y := y
· simp [WithBot.none_eq_bot, eq_bot_iff_forall_le]
· exact ⟨fun h ↦ h _ le_rfl, fun hmn a ham ↦ hmn.trans ham⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [NoBotOrder α] {x y : WithBot α}
lemma eq_of_forall_le_coe_iff (h : ∀ a : α, x ≤ a ↔ y ≤ a) : x = y :=
le_antisymm (forall_le_coe_iff_le.mp fun a ↦ (h a).2) (forall_le_coe_iff_le.mp fun a ↦ (h a).1)
end PartialOrder
instance semilatticeSup [SemilatticeSup α] : SemilatticeSup (WithBot α) where
sup
-- note this is `Option.merge`, but with the right defeq when unfolding
| ⊥, ⊥ => ⊥
| (a : α), ⊥ => a
| ⊥, (b : α) => b
| (a : α), (b : α) => ↑(a ⊔ b)
le_sup_left x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
le_sup_right x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
sup_le x y z := by cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp; simpa using sup_le
theorem coe_sup [SemilatticeSup α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊔ b : α) : WithBot α) = (a : WithBot α) ⊔ b :=
rfl
instance semilatticeInf [SemilatticeInf α] : SemilatticeInf (WithBot α) where
inf := .map₂ (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
inf_le_right x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp
le_inf x y z := by cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp; simpa using le_inf
theorem coe_inf [SemilatticeInf α] (a b : α) : ((a ⊓ b : α) : WithBot α) = (a : WithBot α) ⊓ b :=
rfl
instance lattice [Lattice α] : Lattice (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.semilatticeSup, WithBot.semilatticeInf with }
instance distribLattice [DistribLattice α] : DistribLattice (WithBot α) where
le_sup_inf x y z := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> cases z <;> simp [← coe_inf, ← coe_sup]
simpa [← coe_inf, ← coe_sup] using le_sup_inf
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (WithBot α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq (Option α)
instance decidableLE [LE α] [DecidableLE α] : DecidableLE (WithBot α)
| ⊥, _ => isTrue <| by simp
| (a : α), ⊥ => isFalse <| by simp
| (a : α), (b : α) => decidable_of_iff' _ coe_le_coe
instance decidableLT [LT α] [DecidableLT α] : DecidableLT (WithBot α)
| _, ⊥ => isFalse <| by simp
| ⊥, (a : α) => isTrue <| by simp
| (a : α), (b : α) => decidable_of_iff' _ coe_lt_coe
instance isTotal_le [LE α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] : IsTotal (WithBot α) (· ≤ ·) where
total x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp; simpa using IsTotal.total ..
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {x y : WithBot α}
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder (WithBot α) := Lattice.toLinearOrder _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_min (a b : α) : ↑(min a b) = min (a : WithBot α) b := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_max (a b : α) : ↑(max a b) = max (a : WithBot α) b := rfl
variable [DenselyOrdered α] [NoMinOrder α]
lemma le_of_forall_lt_iff_le : (∀ z : α, x < z → y ≤ z) ↔ y ≤ x := by
| cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [exists_lt, forall_gt_imp_ge_iff_le_of_dense]
lemma ge_of_forall_gt_iff_ge : (∀ z : α, z < x → z ≤ y) ↔ x ≤ y := by
| Mathlib/Order/WithBot.lean | 414 | 416 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open CharZero Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← exp_conj, map_ofNat, div_neg,
neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div, -neg_add_rev, ← neg_add]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
Hurwitz zeta function). See `oddKernel_def` for the defining formula, and `hasSum_int_oddKernel`
for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`.
-/
@[irreducible] def oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun a : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x))) 1 by
intro a; simp [jacobiTheta₂''_add_left]).lift a
lemma oddKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel a x) = jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x) := by
simp [oddKernel, ← conj_eq_iff_re, jacobiTheta₂''_conj]
lemma oddKernel_def' (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) *
(jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (I * x) / (2 * π * I) + a * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x)) := by
rw [oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'', ← mul_assoc ↑a I x,
(by ring : ↑π * I * ↑a ^ 2 * (I * ↑x) = I ^ 2 * ↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * x), I_sq, neg_one_mul]
lemma oddKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : oddKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, oddKernel_def', jacobiTheta₂_undef, jacobiTheta₂'_undef, zero_div, zero_add,
mul_zero, mul_zero] <;>
simpa
/-- Auxiliary function appearing in the functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta kernel, equal
to `∑ (n : ℕ), 2 * n * sin (2 * π * n * a) * exp (-π * n ^ 2 * x)`. See `hasSum_nat_sinKernel`
for the defining sum. -/
@[irreducible] def sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂' ξ (I * x) / (-2 * π))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂'_add_left]).lift a
lemma sinKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(sinKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂' a (I * x) / (-2 * π) := by
simp [sinKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂'_conj, map_ofNat]
lemma sinKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : sinKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simpa), zero_div]
lemma oddKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : oddKernel (-a) x = -oddKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left]
@[simp] lemma oddKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : oddKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using oddKernel_neg 0 x
lemma sinKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
sinKernel (-a) x = -sinKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left,
neg_div]
@[simp] lemma sinKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : sinKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using sinKernel_neg 0 x
/-- The odd kernel is continuous on `Ioi 0`. -/
lemma continuousOn_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (oddKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (oddKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [oddKernel_def' a]
refine fun x hx ↦ ((Continuous.continuousAt ?_).mul ?_).continuousWithinAt
· fun_prop
· have hf : Continuous fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u) := by fun_prop
apply ContinuousAt.add
· exact ((continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt).div_const _
· exact continuousAt_const.mul <| (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x)
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt
lemma continuousOn_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (sinKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (sinKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [sinKernel_def]
apply (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)).div_const
have h := continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' a (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
fun_prop
lemma oddKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
oddKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (3 / 2 : ℝ) * sinKernel a (1 / x) := by
-- first reduce to `0 < x`
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [oddKernel_undef _ hx, sinKernel_undef _ (one_div_nonpos.mpr hx), mul_zero]
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
| have h1 : -1 / (I * ↑(1 / x)) = I * x := by rw [one_div, ofReal_inv, mul_comm, ← div_div,
div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg, neg_one_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm]
have h2 : (-I * (I * ↑(1 / x))) = 1 / x := by
rw [← mul_assoc, neg_mul, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
have h3 : (x : ℂ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, hx.ne', false_and, not_false_eq_true]
have h4 : arg x ≠ π := by rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le]; exact pi_ne_zero.symm
rw [← ofReal_inj, oddKernel_def, ofReal_mul, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation',
h1, h2]
generalize jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * ↑x) = J
rw [one_div (x : ℂ), inv_cpow _ _ h4, div_inv_eq_mul, one_div, ofReal_inv, ofReal_cpow hx.le,
ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_ofNat, ← mul_div_assoc _ _ (-2 * π : ℂ),
eq_div_iff <| mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero),
← div_eq_inv_mul, eq_div_iff h3, mul_comm J _, mul_right_comm]
end kernel_defs
section sum_formulas
/-!
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 184 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Rotate
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
/-!
# Permutations of `Fin n`
-/
assert_not_exists LinearMap
open Equiv
/-- Permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` are equivalent to fixing a single
`Fin (n + 1)` and permuting the remaining with a `Perm (Fin n)`.
The fixed `Fin (n + 1)` is swapped with `0`. -/
def Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin {n : ℕ} : Perm (Fin n.succ) ≃ Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n) :=
((Equiv.permCongr <| finSuccEquiv n).trans Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption).trans
(Equiv.prodCongr (finSuccEquiv n).symm (Equiv.refl _))
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, Equiv.refl _) = swap 0 p := by
simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Equiv.permCongr_def]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, 1) = swap 0 p :=
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl p
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 0 = p := by simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin n)) (p : Fin (n + 1))
(x : Fin n) : Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) x.succ = swap 0 p (e x).succ := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p
· simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· intro i
by_cases h : i = e x
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map, swap_apply_def, Ne.symm h]
|
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin (n + 1))) (p : Fin (n + 2)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 1 = swap 0 p (e 0).succ := by
rw [← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ e p 0]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Perm.sign (Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e)) = ite (p = 0) 1 (-1) * Perm.sign e := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Fin.lean | 49 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Supported
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Truncated
/-!
# Leading terms of Witt vector multiplication
The goal of this file is to study the leading terms of the formula for the `n+1`st coefficient
of a product of Witt vectors `x` and `y` over a ring of characteristic `p`.
We aim to isolate the `n+1`st coefficients of `x` and `y`, and express the rest of the product
in terms of a function of the lower coefficients.
For most of this file we work with terms of type `MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ`.
We will eventually evaluate them in `k`, but first we must take care of a calculation
that needs to happen in characteristic 0.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.nth_mul_coeff`: expresses the coefficient of a product of Witt vectors
in terms of the previous coefficients of the multiplicands.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace WittVector
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
variable {k : Type*} [CommRing k]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
-- Porting note: new notation
local notation "𝕄" => MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ
open Finset MvPolynomial
/--
```
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val) *
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val)
```
-/
def wittPolyProd (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) *
rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)
theorem wittPolyProd_vars (n : ℕ) : (wittPolyProd p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [wittPolyProd]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_rename _ _) ?_
simp [wittPolynomial_vars, image_subset_iff]
/-- The "remainder term" of `WittVector.wittPolyProd`. See `mul_polyOfInterest_aux2`. -/
def wittPolyProdRemainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
∑ i ∈ range n, (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i)
theorem wittPolyProdRemainder_vars (n : ℕ) :
(wittPolyProdRemainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range n := by
rw [wittPolyProdRemainder]
refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
have : (p : 𝕄) = C (p : ℤ) := by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast]
rw [this, vars_C]
apply empty_subset
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
apply Subset.trans (wittMul_vars _ _)
apply product_subset_product (Subset.refl _)
simp only [mem_range, range_subset] at hx ⊢
exact hx
/-- `remainder p n` represents the remainder term from `mul_polyOfInterest_aux3`.
`wittPolyProd p (n+1)` will have variables up to `n+1`,
but `remainder` will only have variables up to `n`.
-/
def remainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
(∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 0)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))) *
∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 1)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))
theorem remainder_vars (n : ℕ) : (remainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [remainder]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
rw [rename_monomial, vars_monomial, Finsupp.mapDomain_single]
· apply Subset.trans Finsupp.support_single_subset
simpa using mem_range.mp hx
· apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
/-- This is the polynomial whose degree we want to get a handle on. -/
def polyOfInterest (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1))
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i) = wittPolyProd p n := by
simp only [wittPolyProd]
convert wittStructureInt_prop p (X (0 : Fin 2) * X 1) n using 1
· simp only [wittPolynomial, wittMul]
rw [map_sum]
congr 1 with i
congr 1
have hsupp : (Finsupp.single i (p ^ (n - i))).support = {i} := by
rw [Finsupp.support_eq_singleton]
simp only [and_true, Finsupp.single_eq_same, eq_self_iff_true, Ne]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero
simp only [bind₁_monomial, hsupp, Int.cast_natCast, prod_singleton, eq_intCast,
Finsupp.single_eq_same, C_pow, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Int.cast_pow]
· simp only [map_mul, bind₁_X_right]
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux2 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ n * wittMul p n + wittPolyProdRemainder p n = wittPolyProd p n := by
convert mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 p n
rw [sum_range_succ, add_comm, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, pow_one]
rfl
-- We redeclare `p` here to locally discard the unneeded `p.Prime` hypothesis.
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 (p n : ℕ) : wittPolyProd p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
remainder p n := by
-- a useful auxiliary fact
have mvpz : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = MvPolynomial.C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
-- Porting note: the original proof applies `sum_range_succ` through a non-`conv` rewrite,
-- but this does not work in Lean 4; the whole proof also times out very badly. The proof has been
-- nearly totally rewritten here and now finishes quite fast.
rw [wittPolyProd, wittPolynomial, map_sum, map_sum]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_lhs =>
arg 2
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
simp only [add_mul, mul_add]
rw [add_comm _ (remainder p n)]
simp only [add_assoc]
apply congrArg (Add.add _)
ring
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * wittMul p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1)) := by
rw [← add_sub_assoc, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, mul_polyOfInterest_aux2]
exact mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 _ _
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux5 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * polyOfInterest p n = remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1) := by
simp only [polyOfInterest, mul_sub, mul_add, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
rw [mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 p n]
ring
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_vars (n : ℕ) :
((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * polyOfInterest p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [mul_polyOfInterest_aux5]
apply Subset.trans (vars_sub_subset _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply remainder_vars
· apply wittPolyProdRemainder_vars
theorem polyOfInterest_vars_eq (n : ℕ) : (polyOfInterest p n).vars =
((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * (wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)))).vars := by
have : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
rw [polyOfInterest, this, vars_C_mul]
apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
theorem polyOfInterest_vars (n : ℕ) : (polyOfInterest p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [polyOfInterest_vars_eq]; apply mul_polyOfInterest_vars
theorem peval_polyOfInterest (n : ℕ) (x y : 𝕎 k) :
peval (polyOfInterest p n) ![fun i => x.coeff i, fun i => y.coeff i] =
(x * y).coeff (n + 1) + p ^ (n + 1) * x.coeff (n + 1) * y.coeff (n + 1) -
y.coeff (n + 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1 + 1), p ^ i * x.coeff i ^ p ^ (n + 1 - i) -
x.coeff (n + 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1 + 1), p ^ i * y.coeff i ^ p ^ (n + 1 - i) := by
simp only [polyOfInterest, peval, map_natCast, Matrix.head_cons, map_pow,
Function.uncurry_apply_pair, aeval_X, Matrix.cons_val_one, map_mul, Matrix.cons_val_zero,
map_sub]
rw [sub_sub, add_comm (_ * _), ← sub_sub]
simp [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, aeval, eval₂_rename, mul_coeff, peval, map_natCast,
map_add, map_pow, map_mul]
variable [CharP k p]
/-- The characteristic `p` version of `peval_polyOfInterest` -/
theorem peval_polyOfInterest' (n : ℕ) (x y : 𝕎 k) :
peval (polyOfInterest p n) ![fun i => x.coeff i, fun i => y.coeff i] =
| (x * y).coeff (n + 1) - y.coeff (n + 1) * x.coeff 0 ^ p ^ (n + 1) -
x.coeff (n + 1) * y.coeff 0 ^ p ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [peval_polyOfInterest]
have : (p : k) = 0 := CharP.cast_eq_zero k p
simp only [this, Nat.cast_pow, ne_eq, add_eq_zero, and_false, zero_pow, zero_mul, add_zero,
not_false_eq_true, reduceCtorEq]
have sum_zero_pow_mul_pow_p (y : 𝕎 k) : ∑ x ∈ range (n + 1 + 1),
(0 : k) ^ x * y.coeff x ^ p ^ (n + 1 - x) = y.coeff 0 ^ p ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem 0] <;> simp +contextual
congr <;> apply sum_zero_pow_mul_pow_p
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/MulCoeff.lean | 219 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lorenzo Luccioli, Rémy Degenne, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Probability.Moments.ComplexMGF
/-!
# Gaussian distributions over ℝ
We define a Gaussian measure over the reals.
## Main definitions
* `gaussianPDFReal`: the function `μ v x ↦ (1 / (sqrt (2 * pi * v))) * exp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v))`,
which is the probability density function of a Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v` (when `v ≠ 0`).
* `gaussianPDF`: `ℝ≥0∞`-valued pdf, `gaussianPDF μ v x = ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x)`.
* `gaussianReal`: a Gaussian measure on `ℝ`, parametrized by its mean `μ` and variance `v`.
If `v = 0`, this is `dirac μ`, otherwise it is defined as the measure with density
`gaussianPDF μ v` with respect to the Lebesgue measure.
## Main results
* `gaussianReal_add_const`: if `X` is a random variable with Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v`, then `X + y` is Gaussian with mean `μ + y` and variance `v`.
* `gaussianReal_const_mul`: if `X` is a random variable with Gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and
variance `v`, then `c * X` is Gaussian with mean `c * μ` and variance `c^2 * v`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Real Complex
open MeasureTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
section GaussianPDF
/-- Probability density function of the gaussian distribution with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v))
lemma gaussianPDFReal_def (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v =
fun x ↦ (Real.sqrt (2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (x - μ)^2 / (2 * v)) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_zero_var (m : ℝ) : gaussianPDFReal m 0 = 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [gaussianPDFReal]
/-- The gaussian pdf is positive when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma gaussianPDFReal_pos (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) (hv : v ≠ 0) : 0 < gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal]
positivity
/-- The gaussian pdf is nonnegative. -/
lemma gaussianPDFReal_nonneg (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal]
positivity
/-- The gaussian pdf is measurable. -/
lemma measurable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) :=
(((measurable_id.add_const _).pow_const _).neg.div_const _).exp.const_mul _
/-- The gaussian pdf is strongly measurable. -/
lemma stronglyMeasurable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
StronglyMeasurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) :=
(measurable_gaussianPDFReal μ v).stronglyMeasurable
@[fun_prop]
lemma integrable_gaussianPDFReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
Integrable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) := by
rw [gaussianPDFReal_def]
by_cases hv : v = 0
· simp [hv]
let g : ℝ → ℝ := fun x ↦ (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- x ^ 2 / (2 * v))
have hg : Integrable g := by
suffices g = fun x ↦ (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹ * rexp (- (2 * v)⁻¹ * x ^ 2) by
rw [this]
refine (integrable_exp_neg_mul_sq ?_).const_mul (√(2 * π * v))⁻¹
simp [lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) (Ne.symm hv)]
ext x
simp only [g, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left, NNReal.zero_le_coe, Real.sqrt_mul',
mul_inv_rev, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_inv, NNReal.coe_ofNat, neg_mul, mul_eq_mul_left_iff,
Real.exp_eq_exp, mul_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, Real.sqrt_eq_zero, NNReal.coe_eq_zero, hv,
false_or]
rw [mul_comm]
left
field_simp
exact Integrable.comp_sub_right hg μ
/-- The gaussian distribution pdf integrates to 1 when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (h : v ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x) = 1 := by
rw [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_one_iff]
have hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable (gaussianPDFReal μ v) volume :=
(stronglyMeasurable_gaussianPDFReal μ v).aestronglyMeasurable
have hf : 0 ≤ₐₛ gaussianPDFReal μ v := ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg μ v)
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfm]
simp only [gaussianPDFReal, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right, one_div,
Nat.cast_ofNat, integral_const_mul]
rw [integral_sub_right_eq_self (μ := volume) (fun a ↦ rexp (-a ^ 2 / ((2 : ℝ) * v))) μ]
simp only [zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv_rev,
mul_neg]
simp_rw [← neg_mul]
rw [neg_mul, integral_gaussian, ← Real.sqrt_inv, ← Real.sqrt_mul]
· field_simp
ring
· positivity
/-- The gaussian distribution pdf integrates to 1 when the variance is not zero. -/
lemma integral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
∫ x, gaussianPDFReal μ v x = 1 := by
have h := lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one μ hv
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _)
(ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)), ← ENNReal.ofReal_one] at h
rwa [← ENNReal.ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff (integral_nonneg (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)) zero_le_one]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_sub {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x y : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (x - y) = gaussianPDFReal (μ + y) v x := by
simp only [gaussianPDFReal]
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_add {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x y : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (x + y) = gaussianPDFReal (μ - y) v x := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← gaussianPDFReal_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg]
lemma gaussianPDFReal_inv_mul {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (c⁻¹ * x) = |c| * gaussianPDFReal (c * μ) (⟨c^2, sq_nonneg _⟩ * v) x := by
simp only [gaussianPDFReal.eq_1, zero_lt_two, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_left, NNReal.zero_le_coe,
Real.sqrt_mul', one_div, mul_inv_rev, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_mk, NNReal.coe_pos]
rw [← mul_assoc]
refine congr_arg₂ _ ?_ ?_
· field_simp
rw [Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs]
ring_nf
calc (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹
= (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹ * (|c| * |c|⁻¹) := by
rw [mul_inv_cancel₀, mul_one]
simp only [ne_eq, abs_eq_zero, hc, not_false_eq_true]
_ = (Real.sqrt ↑v)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt 2)⁻¹ * (Real.sqrt π)⁻¹ * |c| * |c|⁻¹ := by ring
· congr 1
field_simp
congr 1
ring
lemma gaussianPDFReal_mul {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
gaussianPDFReal μ v (c * x)
= |c⁻¹| * gaussianPDFReal (c⁻¹ * μ) (⟨(c^2)⁻¹, inv_nonneg.mpr (sq_nonneg _)⟩ * v) x := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_inv c, gaussianPDFReal_inv_mul (inv_ne_zero hc)]
simp
/-- The pdf of a Gaussian distribution on ℝ with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianPDF (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) (x : ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ := ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x)
lemma gaussianPDF_def (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
gaussianPDF μ v = fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (gaussianPDFReal μ v x) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma gaussianPDF_zero_var (μ : ℝ) : gaussianPDF μ 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [gaussianPDF]
@[simp]
lemma toReal_gaussianPDF {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} (x : ℝ) :
(gaussianPDF μ v x).toReal = gaussianPDFReal μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDF, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg μ v x)]
lemma gaussianPDF_pos (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) : 0 < gaussianPDF μ v x := by
rw [gaussianPDF, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
exact gaussianPDFReal_pos _ _ _ hv
lemma gaussianPDF_lt_top {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} : gaussianPDF μ v x < ∞ := by simp [gaussianPDF]
lemma gaussianPDF_ne_top {μ : ℝ} {v : ℝ≥0} {x : ℝ} : gaussianPDF μ v x ≠ ∞ := by simp [gaussianPDF]
@[measurability, fun_prop]
lemma measurable_gaussianPDF (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measurable (gaussianPDF μ v) :=
(measurable_gaussianPDFReal _ _).ennreal_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma lintegral_gaussianPDF_eq_one (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (h : v ≠ 0) :
∫⁻ x, gaussianPDF μ v x = 1 :=
lintegral_gaussianPDFReal_eq_one μ h
end GaussianPDF
section GaussianReal
/-- A Gaussian distribution on `ℝ` with mean `μ` and variance `v`. -/
noncomputable
def gaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) : Measure ℝ :=
if v = 0 then Measure.dirac μ else volume.withDensity (gaussianPDF μ v)
lemma gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
gaussianReal μ v = volume.withDensity (gaussianPDF μ v) := if_neg hv
@[simp]
lemma gaussianReal_zero_var (μ : ℝ) : gaussianReal μ 0 = Measure.dirac μ := if_pos rfl
instance instIsProbabilityMeasureGaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (gaussianReal μ v) where
measure_univ := by by_cases h : v = 0 <;> simp [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero, h]
lemma gaussianReal_apply (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
gaussianReal μ v s = ∫⁻ x in s, gaussianPDF μ v x := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv, withDensity_apply' _ s]
lemma gaussianReal_apply_eq_integral (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
gaussianReal μ v s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x in s, gaussianPDFReal μ v x) := by
rw [gaussianReal_apply _ hv s, ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· rfl
· exact (integrable_gaussianPDFReal _ _).restrict
· exact ae_of_all _ (gaussianPDFReal_nonneg _ _)
lemma gaussianReal_absolutelyContinuous (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
gaussianReal μ v ≪ volume := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv]
exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
| lemma gaussianReal_absolutelyContinuous' (μ : ℝ) {v : ℝ≥0} (hv : v ≠ 0) :
volume ≪ gaussianReal μ v := by
rw [gaussianReal_of_var_ne_zero _ hv]
refine withDensity_absolutelyContinuous' ?_ ?_
· exact (measurable_gaussianPDF _ _).aemeasurable
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ (gaussianPDF_pos _ hv _).ne')
lemma rnDeriv_gaussianReal (μ : ℝ) (v : ℝ≥0) :
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Gaussian.lean | 224 | 231 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZeta
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeriesComplex
/-!
# Definition of the Riemann zeta function
## Main definitions:
* `riemannZeta`: the Riemann zeta function `ζ : ℂ → ℂ`.
* `completedRiemannZeta`: the completed zeta function `Λ : ℂ → ℂ`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (away from the poles of `Γ(s / 2)`).
* `completedRiemannZeta₀`: the entire function `Λ₀` satisfying
`Λ₀(s) = Λ(s) + 1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s` wherever the RHS is defined.
Note that mathematically `ζ(s)` is undefined at `s = 1`, while `Λ(s)` is undefined at both `s = 0`
and `s = 1`. Our construction assigns some values at these points; exact formulae involving the
Euler-Mascheroni constant will follow in a subsequent PR.
## Main results:
* `differentiable_completedZeta₀` : the function `Λ₀(s)` is entire.
* `differentiableAt_completedZeta` : the function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and
`s = 1`.
* `differentiableAt_riemannZeta` : the function `ζ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 1`.
* `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow` : for `1 < re s`, we have
`ζ(s) = ∑' (n : ℕ), 1 / (n + 1) ^ s`.
* `completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub`, `completedRiemannZeta_one_sub`, and `riemannZeta_one_sub` :
functional equation relating values at `s` and `1 - s`
For special-value formulae expressing `ζ (2 * k)` and `ζ (1 - 2 * k)` in terms of Bernoulli numbers
see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaValues`. For computation of the constant term as
`s → 1`, see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.ZetaAsymp`.
## Outline of proofs:
These results are mostly special cases of more general results for even Hurwitz zeta functions
proved in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaEven`.
-/
open CharZero Set Filter HurwitzZeta
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp
open scoped Topology Real
noncomputable section
/-!
## Definition of the completed Riemann zeta
-/
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function with its poles removed, `Λ(s) + 1 / s - 1 / (s - 1)`. -/
def completedRiemannZeta₀ (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function, `Λ(s)`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (up to a minor correction at `s = 0`). -/
def completedRiemannZeta (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀,
hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma completedRiemannZeta_eq (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s - 1 / s - 1 / (1 - s) := by
simp_rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven_eq, if_true]
/-- The modified completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s) + 1 / s + 1 / (1 - s)` is entire. -/
theorem differentiable_completedZeta₀ : Differentiable ℂ completedRiemannZeta₀ :=
differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_completedZeta {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
DifferentiableAt ℂ completedRiemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 (Or.inl hs) hs'
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ₀`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ₀(1 - s) = Λ₀ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta₀ (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero, ← completedCosZeta₀_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_one_sub]
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `Λ`: for any complex `s` we have
`Λ (1 - s) = Λ s`. -/
theorem completedRiemannZeta_one_sub (s : ℂ) :
completedRiemannZeta (1 - s) = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [← completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero, ← completedCosZeta_zero, completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub]
/-- The residue of `Λ(s)` at `s = 1` is equal to `1`. -/
lemma completedRiemannZeta_residue_one :
Tendsto (fun s ↦ (s - 1) * completedRiemannZeta s) (𝓝[≠] 1) (𝓝 1) :=
completedHurwitzZetaEven_residue_one 0
/-!
## The un-completed Riemann zeta function
-/
/-- The Riemann zeta function `ζ(s)`. -/
def riemannZeta := hurwitzZetaEven 0
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZetaEven_zero : hurwitzZetaEven 0 = riemannZeta := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.cosZeta_zero : cosZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
simp_rw [cosZeta, riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, if_true, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero,
completedCosZeta_zero]
lemma HurwitzZeta.hurwitzZeta_zero : hurwitzZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
simpa [hurwitzZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_zero] using hurwitzZetaOdd_neg 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.expZeta_zero : expZeta 0 = riemannZeta := by
ext1 s
rw [expZeta, cosZeta_zero, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero, eq_false_intro I_ne_zero, false_or,
← eq_neg_self_iff, ← sinZeta_neg, neg_zero]
/-- The Riemann zeta function is differentiable away from `s = 1`. -/
theorem differentiableAt_riemannZeta {s : ℂ} (hs' : s ≠ 1) : DifferentiableAt ℂ riemannZeta s :=
differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven _ hs'
/-- We have `ζ(0) = -1 / 2`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_zero : riemannZeta 0 = -1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_self, if_true]
lemma riemannZeta_def_of_ne_zero {s : ℂ} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
riemannZeta s = completedRiemannZeta s / Gammaℝ s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven, Function.update_of_ne hs, completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the zeta function. -/
theorem riemannZeta_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one (n : ℕ) : riemannZeta (-2 * (n + 1)) = 0 :=
hurwitzZetaEven_neg_two_mul_nat_add_one 0 n
/-- Riemann zeta functional equation, formulated for `ζ`: if `1 - s ∉ ℕ`, then we have
`ζ (1 - s) = 2 ^ (1 - s) * π ^ (-s) * Γ s * sin (π * (1 - s) / 2) * ζ s`. -/
theorem riemannZeta_one_sub {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ n : ℕ, s ≠ -n) (hs' : s ≠ 1) :
riemannZeta (1 - s) = 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s * cos (π * s / 2) * riemannZeta s := by
rw [riemannZeta, hurwitzZetaEven_one_sub 0 hs (Or.inr hs'), cosZeta_zero, hurwitzZetaEven_zero]
/-- A formal statement of the **Riemann hypothesis** – constructing a term of this type is worth a
million dollars. -/
def RiemannHypothesis : Prop :=
∀ (s : ℂ) (_ : riemannZeta s = 0) (_ : ¬∃ n : ℕ, s = -2 * (n + 1)) (_ : s ≠ 1), s.re = 1 / 2
/-!
## Relating the Mellin transform to the Dirichlet series
-/
theorem completedZeta_eq_tsum_of_one_lt_re {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
| completedRiemannZeta s =
(π : ℂ) ^ (-s / 2) * Gamma (s / 2) * ∑' n : ℕ, 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ s := by
have := (hasSum_nat_completedCosZeta 0 hs).tsum_eq.symm
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/RiemannZeta.lean | 164 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Submonoid.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Semiring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction.Pointwise
/-!
# Multiplication and division of submodules of an algebra.
An interface for multiplication and division of sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A is developed.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or semiring) and let `A` be an `R`-algebra.
* `1 : Submodule R A` : the R-submodule R of the R-algebra A
* `Mul (Submodule R A)` : multiplication of two sub-R-modules M and N of A is defined to be
the smallest submodule containing all the products `m * n`.
* `Div (Submodule R A)` : `I / J` is defined to be the submodule consisting of all `a : A` such
that `a • J ⊆ I`
It is proved that `Submodule R A` is a semiring, and also an algebra over `Set A`.
Additionally, in the `Pointwise` locale we promote `Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction` to a
`MulSemiringAction` as `Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction`.
When `R` is not necessarily commutative, and `A` is merely a `R`-module with a ring structure
such that `IsScalarTower R A A` holds (equivalent to the data of a ring homomorphism `R →+* A`
by `ringHomEquivModuleIsScalarTower`), we can still define `1 : Submodule R A` and
`Mul (Submodule R A)`, but `1` is only a left identity, not necessarily a right one.
## Tags
multiplication of submodules, division of submodules, submodule semiring
-/
universe uι u v
open Algebra Set MulOpposite
open Pointwise
namespace SubMulAction
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) :=
⟨r, (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm⟩
theorem mem_one' {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
end SubMulAction
namespace Submodule
section Module
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Module R A]
-- TODO: Why is this in a file about `Algebra`?
-- TODO: potentially change this back to `LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A)`
-- once a version of `Algebra` without the `commutes'` field is introduced.
-- See issue https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/18110.
/-- `1 : Submodule R A` is the submodule `R ∙ 1` of `A`.
-/
instance one : One (Submodule R A) :=
⟨LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R A 1)⟩
theorem one_eq_span : (1 : Submodule R A) = R ∙ 1 :=
(LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range _ _ _).symm
theorem le_one_toAddSubmonoid : 1 ≤ (1 : Submodule R A).toAddSubmonoid := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, show (n : R) • (1 : A) = n by rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul, nsmul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubMulAction_one : (1 : Submodule R A).toSubMulAction = 1 :=
SetLike.ext fun _ ↦ by rw [one_eq_span, SubMulAction.mem_one]; exact mem_span_singleton
theorem one_eq_span_one_set : (1 : Submodule R A) = span R 1 :=
one_eq_span
@[simp]
theorem one_le {P : Submodule R A} : (1 : Submodule R A) ≤ P ↔ (1 : A) ∈ P := by
simp [one_eq_span]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
instance : SMul (Submodule R A) (Submodule R M) where
smul A' M' :=
{ __ := A'.toAddSubmonoid • M'.toAddSubmonoid
smul_mem' := fun r m hm ↦ AddSubmonoid.smul_induction_on hm
(fun a ha m hm ↦ by rw [← smul_assoc]; exact AddSubmonoid.smul_mem_smul (A'.smul_mem r ha) hm)
fun m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ ↦ by rw [smul_add]; exact (A'.1 • M'.1).add_mem h₁ h₂ }
section
variable {I J : Submodule R A} {N P : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_toAddSubmonoid : (I • N).toAddSubmonoid = I.toAddSubmonoid • N.toAddSubmonoid := rfl
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_mem_smul hr hn
theorem smul_le : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, r • n ∈ P :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_set_smul : (I : Set A) • N = I • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(fun _ _ hr hx ↦ smul_mem_smul hr hx)
(smul_le.mpr fun _ hr _ hx ↦ mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem hr hx)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N) (smul : ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, p (r • n))
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) : p x :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_induction_on H smul add
/-- Dependent version of `Submodule.smul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction_on' {x : M} (hx : x ∈ I • N) {p : ∀ x, x ∈ I • N → Prop}
(smul : ∀ (r : A) (hr : r ∈ I) (n : M) (hn : n ∈ N), p (r • n) (smul_mem_smul hr hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (h : x ∈ I • N) (H : p x h) ↦ H
exact smul_induction_on hx (fun a ha x hx ↦ ⟨_, smul _ ha _ hx⟩)
fun x y ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_le_smul hij hnp
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N :=
smul_mono h le_rfl
instance : CovariantClass (Submodule R A) (Submodule R M) HSMul.hSMul LE.le :=
⟨fun _ _ => smul_mono le_rfl⟩
variable (I J N P)
@[simp]
theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| AddSubmonoid.addSubmonoid_smul_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : Submodule R A) • N = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp <| smul_le.mpr <| by rintro _ rfl _ _; rw [zero_smul]; exact zero_mem _
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| by
simp only [smul_toAddSubmonoid, sup_toAddSubmonoid, AddSubmonoid.addSubmonoid_smul_sup]
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun mn hmn p hp ↦ by
obtain ⟨m, hm, n, hn, rfl⟩ := mem_sup.mp hmn
rw [add_smul]; exact add_mem_sup (smul_mem_smul hm hp) <| smul_mem_smul hn hp)
(sup_le (smul_mono_left le_sup_left) <| smul_mono_left le_sup_right)
protected theorem smul_assoc {B} [Semiring B] [Module R B] [Module A B] [Module B M]
[IsScalarTower R A B] [IsScalarTower R B M] [IsScalarTower A B M]
(I : Submodule R A) (J : Submodule R B) (N : Submodule R M) :
(I • J) • N = I • J • N :=
le_antisymm
(smul_le.2 fun _ hrsij t htn ↦ smul_induction_on hrsij
(fun r hr s hs ↦ smul_assoc r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
fun x y ↦ (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ add_mem)
(smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hsn ↦ smul_induction_on hsn
(fun j hj n hn ↦ (smul_assoc r j n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hj) hn)
fun m₁ m₂ ↦ (smul_add r m₁ m₂) ▸ add_mem)
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {I : Submodule R A} {t : ι → Submodule R M} :
I • (⨆ i, t i)= ⨆ i, I • t i :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| by
simp only [smul_toAddSubmonoid, iSup_toAddSubmonoid, AddSubmonoid.smul_iSup]
theorem iSup_smul {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → Submodule R A} {N : Submodule R M} :
(⨆ i, t i) • N = ⨆ i, t i • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun t ht s hs ↦ iSup_induction _ (motive := (· • s ∈ _)) ht
(fun i t ht ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| smul_mem_smul ht hs)
(by simp_rw [zero_smul]; apply zero_mem) fun x y ↦ by simp_rw [add_smul]; apply add_mem)
(iSup_le fun i ↦ Submodule.smul_mono_left <| le_iSup _ i)
protected theorem one_smul : (1 : Submodule R A) • N = N := by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun r hr m hm ↦ ?_) fun m hm ↦ ?_
· obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply, smul_one_smul]; exact N.smul_mem r hm
· rw [← one_smul A m]; exact smul_mem_smul (one_le.mp le_rfl) hm
theorem smul_subset_smul : (↑I : Set A) • (↑N : Set M) ⊆ (↑(I • N) : Set M) :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_subset_smul
end
variable [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- Multiplication of sub-R-modules of an R-module A that is also a semiring. The submodule `M * N`
consists of finite sums of elements `m * n` for `m ∈ M` and `n ∈ N`. -/
instance mul : Mul (Submodule R A) where
mul := (· • ·)
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
theorem mul_mem_mul (hm : m ∈ M) (hn : n ∈ N) : m * n ∈ M * N :=
smul_mem_smul hm hn
theorem mul_le : M * N ≤ P ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, m * n ∈ P :=
smul_le
theorem mul_toAddSubmonoid (M N : Submodule R A) :
(M * N).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid * N.toAddSubmonoid := rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on {C : A → Prop} {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N)
(hm : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, C (m * n)) (ha : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C r :=
smul_induction_on hr hm ha
/-- A dependent version of `mul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on' {C : ∀ r, r ∈ M * N → Prop}
(mem_mul_mem : ∀ m (hm : m ∈ M) n (hn : n ∈ N), C (m * n) (mul_mem_mul hm hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, C x hx → C y hy → C (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N) :
C r hr :=
smul_induction_on' hr mem_mul_mem add
variable (M)
@[simp]
theorem mul_bot : M * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
smul_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * M = ⊥ :=
bot_smul _
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : Submodule R A) * M = M :=
Submodule.one_smul _
variable {M}
@[mono]
theorem mul_le_mul (hmp : M ≤ P) (hnq : N ≤ Q) : M * N ≤ P * Q :=
smul_mono hmp hnq
theorem mul_le_mul_left (h : M ≤ N) : M * P ≤ N * P :=
smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_le_mul_right (h : N ≤ P) : M * N ≤ M * P :=
smul_mono_right _ h
theorem mul_comm_of_commute (h : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, Commute m n) : M * N = N * M :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| AddSubmonoid.mul_comm_of_commute h
variable (M N P)
theorem mul_sup : M * (N ⊔ P) = M * N ⊔ M * P :=
smul_sup _ _ _
theorem sup_mul : (M ⊔ N) * P = M * P ⊔ N * P :=
sup_smul _ _ _
theorem mul_subset_mul : (↑M : Set A) * (↑N : Set A) ⊆ (↑(M * N) : Set A) :=
smul_subset_smul _ _
lemma restrictScalars_mul {A B C} [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Semiring C]
[SMul A B] [Module A C] [Module B C] [IsScalarTower A C C] [IsScalarTower B C C]
[IsScalarTower A B C] {I J : Submodule B C} :
| (I * J).restrictScalars A = I.restrictScalars A * J.restrictScalars A :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort uι}
theorem iSup_mul (s : ι → Submodule R A) (t : Submodule R A) : (⨆ i, s i) * t = ⨆ i, s i * t :=
iSup_smul
theorem mul_iSup (t : Submodule R A) (s : ι → Submodule R A) : (t * ⨆ i, s i) = ⨆ i, t * s i :=
smul_iSup
/-- Sub-`R`-modules of an `R`-module form an idempotent semiring. -/
instance : NonUnitalSemiring (Submodule R A) where
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Operations.lean | 276 | 288 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,644 | 2,651 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.Mono
/-!
# The sheaf condition for a presieve
We define what it means for a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v` to be a sheaf *for* a particular
presieve `R` on `X`:
* A *family of elements* `x` for `P` at `R` is an element `x_f` of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`. See `FamilyOfElements`.
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and `f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` both in `R`,
and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂` such that `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`, the restriction of
`x_f₁` along `g₁` agrees with the restriction of `x_f₂` along `g₂`.
See `FamilyOfElements.Compatible`.
* An *amalgamation* `t` for the family is an element of `P X` such that for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`, the restriction of `t` on `f` is `x_f`.
See `FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation`.
We then say `P` is *separated* for `R` if every compatible family has at most one amalgamation,
and it is a *sheaf* for `R` if every compatible family has a unique amalgamation.
See `IsSeparatedFor` and `IsSheafFor`.
In the special case where `R` is a sieve, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R` and `g : Z ⟶ Y`, the restriction of
`x_f` along `g` agrees with `x_(g ≫ f)` (which is well defined since `g ≫ f` is in `R`).
See `FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible` and `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
In the special case where `C` has pullbacks, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` both in `R`,
the restriction of `x_f` along `π₁ : pullback f g ⟶ Y` agrees with the restriction of `x_g`
along `π₂ : pullback f g ⟶ Z`.
See `FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible` and `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
We also provide equivalent conditions to satisfy alternate definitions given in the literature.
* Stacks: The condition of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8 is virtually identical to the
statement of `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition` (since the bijection described there carries
the same information as the unique existence.)
* Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92]: Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`, the definitions of `IsSheaf`
are equivalent. There are also alternate definitions given:
- Yoneda condition: Defined in `yonedaSheafCondition` and equivalence in
`isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
- Matching family for presieves with pullback: `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
## Implementation
The sheaf condition is given as a proposition, rather than a subsingleton in `Type (max u₁ v)`.
This doesn't seem to make a big difference, other than making a couple of definitions noncomputable,
but it means that equivalent conditions can be given as `↔` statements rather than `≃` statements,
which can be convenient.
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.1.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00ZB (sheaves on a topology)
-/
universe w w' v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf `P` given a collection of arrows `R` with fixed codomain `X`
consists of an element of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R`.
A presheaf is a sheaf (resp, separated) if every *compatible* family of elements has exactly one
(resp, at most one) amalgamation.
This data is referred to as a `family` in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. It is also a concrete
version of the elements of the middle object in the Stacks entry which is
more useful for direct calculations. It is also used implicitly in Definition C2.1.2 in [Elephant].
-/
@[stacks 00VM "This is a concrete version of the elements of the middle object there."]
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf on the presieve `R₂` can be restricted to a smaller presieve
`R₁`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
/-- The image of a family of elements by a morphism of presheaves. -/
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
/-- A family of elements for the arrow set `R` is *compatible* if for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and
`f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` in `R`, and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂`, if the square `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`
commutes then the elements of `P Z` obtained by restricting the element of `P Y₁` along `g₁` and
restricting the element of `P Y₂` along `g₂` are the same.
In special cases, this condition can be simplified, see `pullbackCompatible_iff` and
`compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is referred to as a "compatible family" in Definition C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and on nlab:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.Compatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
/--
If the category `C` has pullbacks, this is an alternative condition for a family of elements to be
compatible: For any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` in the presieve `R`, the restriction of the
given elements for `f` and `g` to the pullback agree.
This is equivalent to being compatible (provided `C` has pullbacks), shown in
`pullbackCompatible_iff`.
This is the definition for a "matching" family given in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
Equation (5). Viewing the type `FamilyOfElements` as the middle object of the fork in
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM, this condition expresses that `pr₀* (x) = pr₁* (x)`,
using the notation defined there.
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.PullbackCompatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst f₁ f₂).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map (pullback.snd f₁ f₂).op (x f₂ h₂)
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
/-- The restriction of a compatible family is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
/-- Extend a family of elements to the sieve generated by an arrow set.
This is the construction described as "easy" in Lemma C2.1.3 of [Elephant].
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
/-- The extension of a compatible family to the generated sieve is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
/-- The extension of a family agrees with the original family. -/
theorem extend_agrees {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : R f) :
x.sieveExtend f (le_generate R Y hf) = x f hf := by
have h := (le_generate R Y hf).choose_spec
unfold FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
rw [t h.choose (𝟙 _) _ hf _]
· simp
· rw [id_comp]
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
/-- The restriction of an extension is the original. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.restrict (le_generate R) = x := by
funext Y f hf
exact extend_agrees t hf
/--
If the arrow set for a family of elements is actually a sieve (i.e. it is downward closed) then the
consistency condition can be simplified.
This is an equivalent condition, see `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is the notion of "matching" given for families on sieves given in [MM92], Chapter III,
Section 4, Equation 1, and nlab: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family.
See also the discussion before Lemma C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
def FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y Z⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (hf), x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf)
theorem compatible_iff_sieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
x.Compatible ↔ x.SieveCompatible := by
constructor
· intro h Y Z f g hf
simpa using h (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
· intro h Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ k
simp_rw [← h f₁ g₁ h₁, ← h f₂ g₂ h₂]
congr
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible {x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)}
(t : x.Compatible) : x.SieveCompatible :=
(compatible_iff_sieveCompatible x).1 t
/--
Given a family of elements `x` for the sieve `S` generated by a presieve `R`, if `x` is restricted
to `R` and then extended back up to `S`, the resulting extension equals `x`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem extend_restrict {x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R).arrows} (t : x.Compatible) :
(x.restrict (le_generate R)).sieveExtend = x := by
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at t
funext _ _ h
apply (t _ _ _).symm.trans
congr
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
/--
Two compatible families on the sieve generated by a presieve `R` are equal if and only if they are
equal when restricted to `R`.
-/
theorem restrict_inj {x₁ x₂ : FamilyOfElements P (generate R).arrows} (t₁ : x₁.Compatible)
(t₂ : x₂.Compatible) : x₁.restrict (le_generate R) = x₂.restrict (le_generate R) → x₁ = x₂ :=
fun h => by
rw [← extend_restrict t₁, ← extend_restrict t₂]
-- Porting note: congr fails to make progress
apply congr_arg
exact h
/-- Compatible families of elements for a presheaf of types `P` and a presieve `R`
are in 1-1 correspondence with compatible families for the same presheaf and
the sieve generated by `R`, through extension and restriction. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible :
{ x : FamilyOfElements P R // x.Compatible } ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.sieveExtend, x.2.sieveExtend⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1.restrict (le_generate R), x.2.restrict _⟩
left_inv x := Subtype.ext (restrict_extend x.2)
right_inv x := Subtype.ext (extend_restrict x.2)
theorem FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible (S : Sieve X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : S f) {Z} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf) := by
simpa using t (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
section FunctorPullback
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C) {Z : D}
variable {T : Presieve (F.obj Z)} {x : FamilyOfElements P T}
/--
Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `F(X)`, we can realize it as a family of elements of
`S.functorPullback F`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.functorPullback (x : FamilyOfElements P T) :
FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) (T.functorPullback F) := fun _ f hf => x (F.map f) hf
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback (h : x.Compatible) :
(x.functorPullback F).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
exact h (F.map g₁) (F.map g₂) h₁ h₂ (by simp only [← F.map_comp, eq])
end FunctorPullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X` whose values factors through `F`, we can
realize it as a family of elements of `S.functorPushforward F`. Since the preimage is obtained by
choice, this is not well-defined generally.
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C)
{X : D} {T : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) T) :
FamilyOfElements P (T.functorPushforward F) := fun Y f h => by
obtain ⟨Z, g, h, h₁, _⟩ := getFunctorPushforwardStructure h
exact P.map h.op (x g h₁)
section Pullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X`, and a map `Y ⟶ X`, we can obtain a
family of elements of `S.pullback f` by taking the same elements.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
FamilyOfElements P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y) := fun _ g hg => x (g ≫ f) hg
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S.arrows}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.pullback f).Compatible := by
simp only [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at h ⊢
intro W Z f₁ f₂ hf
unfold FamilyOfElements.pullback
rw [← h (f₁ ≫ f) f₂ hf]
congr 1
simp only [assoc]
end Pullback
/-- Given a morphism of presheaves `f : P ⟶ Q`, we can take a family of elements valued in `P` to a
family of elements valued in `Q` by composing with `f`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements Q R := fun Y g hg => f.app (op Y) (x g hg)
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_id (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
x.compPresheafMap (𝟙 P) = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_comp (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (f : P ⟶ Q)
(g : Q ⟶ U) : (x.compPresheafMap f).compPresheafMap g = x.compPresheafMap (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.compPresheafMap f).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
unfold FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.naturality, ← FunctorToTypes.naturality, h]
/--
The given element `t` of `P.obj (op X)` is an *amalgamation* for the family of elements `x` if every
restriction `P.map f.op t = x_f` for every arrow `f` in the presieve `R`.
This is the definition given in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents,
and https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family, as well as [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
equation (2).
-/
def FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : R f), P.map f.op t = x f h
theorem FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation.compPresheafMap {x : FamilyOfElements P R} {t} (f : P ⟶ Q)
(h : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.compPresheafMap f).IsAmalgamation (f.app (op X) t) := by
intro Y g hg
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap]
change (f.app _ ≫ Q.map _) _ = _
rw [← f.naturality, types_comp_apply, h g hg]
theorem is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(h : ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.Compatible := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := h
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ comm
rw [← ht _ h₁, ← ht _ h₂, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, comm]
simp
theorem isAmalgamation_restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) (x : FamilyOfElements P R₂)
(t : P.obj (op X)) (ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.restrict h).IsAmalgamation t := fun Y f hf =>
ht f (h Y hf)
theorem isAmalgamation_sieveExtend {R : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X))
(ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.sieveExtend.IsAmalgamation t := by
intro Y f hf
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend]
rw [← ht _, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
/-- A presheaf is separated for a presieve if there is at most one amalgamation. -/
def IsSeparatedFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t₁ t₂), x.IsAmalgamation t₁ → x.IsAmalgamation t₂ → t₁ = t₂
theorem IsSeparatedFor.ext {R : Presieve X} (hR : IsSeparatedFor P R) {t₁ t₂ : P.obj (op X)}
(h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (_ : R f), P.map f.op t₁ = P.map f.op t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
hR (fun _ f _ => P.map f.op t₂) t₁ t₂ (fun _ _ hf => h hf) fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem isSeparatedFor_iff_generate :
IsSeparatedFor P R ↔ IsSeparatedFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
constructor
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h (x.restrict (le_generate R)) t₁ t₂ _ _
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₂ ht₂
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h x.sieveExtend
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₂ ht₂
theorem isSeparatedFor_top (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSeparatedFor P (⊤ : Presieve X) :=
fun x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂ => by
have q₁ := h₁ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
have q₂ := h₂ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
simp only [op_id, FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply] at q₁ q₂
rw [q₁, q₂]
/-- We define `P` to be a sheaf for the presieve `R` if every compatible family has a unique
amalgamation.
This is the definition of a sheaf for the given presieve given in C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents.
Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`,
this is equivalent to the definition of a sheaf in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def IsSheafFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃! t, x.IsAmalgamation t
/-- This is an equivalent condition to be a sheaf, which is useful for the abstraction to local
operators on elementary toposes. However this definition is defined only for sieves, not presieves.
The equivalence between this and `IsSheafFor` is given in `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
This version is also useful to establish that being a sheaf is preserved under isomorphism of
presheaves.
See the discussion before Equation (3) of [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. See also C2.1.4 of
[Elephant]. -/
@[stacks 00Z8 "Direct reformulation"]
def YonedaSheafCondition (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) (S : Sieve X) : Prop :=
∀ f : S.functor ⟶ P, ∃! g, S.functorInclusion ≫ g = f
-- TODO: We can generalize the universe parameter v₁ above by composing with
-- appropriate `ulift_functor`s.
/-- (Implementation). This is a (primarily internal) equivalence between natural transformations
and compatible families.
Cf the discussion after Lemma 7.47.10 in <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00YW>. See also
the proof of C2.1.4 of [Elephant], and the discussion in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def natTransEquivCompatibleFamily {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
(S.functor ⟶ P) ≃ { x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun α := by
refine ⟨fun Y f hf => ?_, ?_⟩
· apply α.app (op Y) ⟨_, hf⟩
· rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
intro Y Z f g hf
dsimp
rw [← FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ α g.op]
rfl
invFun t :=
{ app := fun _ f => t.1 _ f.2
naturality := fun Y Z g => by
ext ⟨f, hf⟩
apply t.2.to_sieveCompatible _ }
left_inv α := by
ext X ⟨_, _⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rfl
/-- (Implementation). A lemma useful to prove `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`. -/
theorem extension_iff_amalgamation {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (x : S.functor ⟶ P) (g : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) :
S.functorInclusion ≫ g = x ↔
(natTransEquivCompatibleFamily x).1.IsAmalgamation (yonedaEquiv g) := by
change _ ↔ ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : S f), P.map f.op (yonedaEquiv g) = x.app (op Y) ⟨f, h⟩
constructor
· rintro rfl Y f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp
simp [yonedaEquiv_apply]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
· intro h
ext Y ⟨f, hf⟩
convert h f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp [yonedaEquiv]
simp
/-- The yoneda version of the sheaf condition is equivalent to the sheaf condition.
C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
theorem isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X) ↔ YonedaSheafCondition P S := by
rw [IsSheafFor, YonedaSheafCondition]
simp_rw [extension_iff_amalgamation]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr_left natTransEquivCompatibleFamily]
rw [Subtype.forall]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ by simp [Equiv.existsUnique_congr_right]
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for the sieve `S` on `X`, a natural transformation from `S` (viewed as a functor)
to `P` can be (uniquely) extended to all of `yoneda.obj X`.
f
S → P
↓ ↗
yX
-/
noncomputable def IsSheafFor.extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(f : S.functor ⟶ P) : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).exists.choose
/--
Show that the extension of `f : S.functor ⟶ P` to all of `yoneda.obj X` is in fact an extension, ie
that the triangle below commutes, provided `P` is a sheaf for `S`
f
S → P
↓ ↗
yX
-/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem IsSheafFor.functorInclusion_comp_extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P S.arrows)
(f : S.functor ⟶ P) : S.functorInclusion ≫ h.extend f = f :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).exists.choose_spec
/-- The extension of `f` to `yoneda.obj X` is unique. -/
theorem IsSheafFor.unique_extend {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P S.arrows) {f : S.functor ⟶ P}
(t : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) (ht : S.functorInclusion ≫ t = f) : t = h.extend f :=
(isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition.1 h f).unique ht (h.functorInclusion_comp_extend f)
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for the sieve `S` on `X`, then if two natural transformations from `yoneda.obj X`
to `P` agree when restricted to the subfunctor given by `S`, they are equal.
-/
theorem IsSheafFor.hom_ext {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (h : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(t₁ t₂ : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) (ht : S.functorInclusion ≫ t₁ = S.functorInclusion ≫ t₂) :
t₁ = t₂ :=
(h.unique_extend t₁ ht).trans (h.unique_extend t₂ rfl).symm
/-- `P` is a sheaf for `R` iff it is separated for `R` and there exists an amalgamation. -/
theorem isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor :
(IsSeparatedFor P R ∧ ∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) ↔
IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [IsSeparatedFor, ← forall_and]
apply forall_congr'
intro x
constructor
· intro z hx
exact existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique (z.2 hx) z.1
· intro h
refine ⟨?_, ExistsUnique.exists ∘ h⟩
intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply (h _).unique ht₁ ht₂
exact is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation x ⟨_, ht₂⟩
/-- If `P` is separated for `R` and every family has an amalgamation, then `P` is a sheaf for `R`.
-/
theorem IsSeparatedFor.isSheafFor (t : IsSeparatedFor P R) :
(∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) → IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
exact And.intro t
/-- If `P` is a sheaf for `R`, it is separated for `R`. -/
theorem IsSheafFor.isSeparatedFor : IsSheafFor P R → IsSeparatedFor P R := fun q =>
(isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor.2 q).1
/-- Get the amalgamation of the given compatible family, provided we have a sheaf. -/
noncomputable def IsSheafFor.amalgamate (t : IsSheafFor P R) (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(hx : x.Compatible) : P.obj (op X) :=
(t x hx).exists.choose
theorem IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation (t : IsSheafFor P R) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(hx : x.Compatible) : x.IsAmalgamation (t.amalgamate x hx) :=
(t x hx).exists.choose_spec
@[simp]
theorem IsSheafFor.valid_glue (t : IsSheafFor P R) {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible)
(f : Y ⟶ X) (Hf : R f) : P.map f.op (t.amalgamate x hx) = x f Hf :=
t.isAmalgamation hx f Hf
/-- C2.1.3 in [Elephant] -/
theorem isSheafFor_iff_generate (R : Presieve X) :
IsSheafFor P R ↔ IsSheafFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
rw [← isSeparatedFor_iff_generate]
apply and_congr (Iff.refl _)
constructor
· intro q x hx
apply Exists.imp _ (q _ (hx.restrict (le_generate R)))
intro t ht
simpa [hx] using isAmalgamation_sieveExtend _ _ ht
· intro q x hx
apply Exists.imp _ (q _ hx.sieveExtend)
intro t ht
simpa [hx] using isAmalgamation_restrict (le_generate R) _ _ ht
/-- Every presheaf is a sheaf for the family {𝟙 X}.
[Elephant] C2.1.5(i)
-/
theorem isSheafFor_singleton_iso (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSheafFor P (Presieve.singleton (𝟙 X)) := by
intro x _
refine ⟨x _ (Presieve.singleton_self _), ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp
· intro t ht
simpa using ht _ (Presieve.singleton_self _)
/-- Every presheaf is a sheaf for the maximal sieve.
[Elephant] C2.1.5(ii)
-/
theorem isSheafFor_top_sieve (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSheafFor P ((⊤ : Sieve X) : Presieve X) := by
rw [← generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (𝟙 X)]
rw [← isSheafFor_iff_generate]
apply isSheafFor_singleton_iso
/-- If `P₁ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w` and `P₂ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w` are two naturally equivalent
presheaves, and `P₁` is a sheaf for a presieve `R`, then `P₂` is also a sheaf for `R`. -/
lemma isSheafFor_of_nat_equiv {P₁ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} {P₂ : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w'}
(e : ∀ ⦃X : C⦄, P₁.obj (op X) ≃ P₂.obj (op X))
(he : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : P₁.obj (op Y)),
e (P₁.map f.op x) = P₂.map f.op (e x))
{X : C} {R : Presieve X} (hP₁ : IsSheafFor P₁ R) :
IsSheafFor P₂ R := fun x₂ hx₂ ↦ by
have he' : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (x : P₂.obj (op Y)),
e.symm (P₂.map f.op x) = P₁.map f.op (e.symm x) := fun X Y f x ↦
e.injective (by simp only [Equiv.apply_symm_apply, he])
let x₁ : FamilyOfElements P₁ R := fun Y f hf ↦ e.symm (x₂ f hf)
have hx₁ : x₁.Compatible := fun Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ fac ↦ e.injective
(by simp only [he, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, hx₂ g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ fac, x₁])
have : ∀ (t₂ : P₂.obj (op X)),
x₂.IsAmalgamation t₂ ↔ x₁.IsAmalgamation (e.symm t₂) := fun t₂ ↦ by
simp only [FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation, x₁,
← he', EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
refine ⟨e (hP₁.amalgamate x₁ hx₁), ?_, ?_⟩
· dsimp
simp only [this, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
exact IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation hP₁ hx₁
· intro t₂ ht₂
refine e.symm.injective ?_
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
exact hP₁.isSeparatedFor x₁ _ _ (by simpa only [this] using ht₂)
(IsSheafFor.isAmalgamation hP₁ hx₁)
/-- If `P` is a sheaf for `S`, and it is iso to `P'`, then `P'` is a sheaf for `S`. This shows that
"being a sheaf for a presieve" is a mathematical or hygienic property.
-/
theorem isSheafFor_iso {P' : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w} (i : P ≅ P') (hP : IsSheafFor P R) :
IsSheafFor P' R :=
isSheafFor_of_nat_equiv (fun X ↦ (i.app (op X)).toEquiv)
(fun _ _ f x ↦ congr_fun (i.hom.naturality f.op) x) hP
/-- If a presieve `R` on `X` has a subsieve `S` such that:
* `P` is a sheaf for `S`.
* For every `f` in `R`, `P` is separated for the pullback of `S` along `f`,
then `P` is a sheaf for `R`.
This is closely related to [Elephant] C2.1.6(i).
-/
theorem isSheafFor_subsieve_aux (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
(h : (S : Presieve X) ≤ R) (hS : IsSheafFor P (S : Presieve X))
(trans : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, R f → IsSeparatedFor P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y)) :
IsSheafFor P R := by
rw [← isSeparatedFor_and_exists_isAmalgamation_iff_isSheafFor]
constructor
· intro x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
exact
hS.isSeparatedFor _ _ _ (isAmalgamation_restrict h x t₁ ht₁)
(isAmalgamation_restrict h x t₂ ht₂)
· intro x hx
use hS.amalgamate _ (hx.restrict h)
intro W j hj
apply (trans hj).ext
intro Y f hf
rw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hS.valid_glue (hx.restrict h) _ hf,
FamilyOfElements.restrict, ← hx (𝟙 _) f (h _ hf) _ (id_comp _)]
simp
/--
If `P` is a sheaf for every pullback of the sieve `S`, then `P` is a sheaf for any presieve which
contains `S`.
This is closely related to [Elephant] C2.1.6.
-/
theorem isSheafFor_subsieve (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
(h : (S : Presieve X) ≤ R) (trans : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X),
IsSheafFor P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y)) :
IsSheafFor P R :=
isSheafFor_subsieve_aux P h (by simpa using trans (𝟙 _)) fun _ f _ => (trans f).isSeparatedFor
section Arrows
variable {B : C} {I : Type*} {X : I → C} (π : (i : I) → X i ⟶ B) (P)
/--
A more explicit version of `FamilyOfElements.Compatible` for a `Presieve.ofArrows`.
| -/
def Arrows.Compatible (x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))) : Prop :=
∀ i j Z (gi : Z ⟶ X i) (gj : Z ⟶ X j), gi ≫ π i = gj ≫ π j →
P.map gi.op (x i) = P.map gj.op (x j)
lemma FamilyOfElements.isAmalgamation_iff_ofArrows (x : FamilyOfElements P (ofArrows X π))
(t : P.obj (op B)) :
x.IsAmalgamation t ↔ ∀ (i : I), P.map (π i).op t = x _ (ofArrows.mk i) :=
⟨fun h i ↦ h _ (ofArrows.mk i), fun h _ f ⟨i⟩ ↦ h i⟩
namespace Arrows.Compatible
variable {x : (i : I) → P.obj (op (X i))}
variable {P π}
theorem exists_familyOfElements (hx : Compatible P π x) :
∃ (x' : FamilyOfElements P (ofArrows X π)), ∀ (i : I), x' _ (ofArrows.mk i) = x i := by
choose i h h' using @ofArrows_surj _ _ _ _ _ π
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 686 | 703 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-06")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/FundThmCalculus.lean | 673 | 676 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Sign function
This file defines the sign function for types with zero and a decidable less-than relation, and
proves some basic theorems about it.
-/
-- Don't generate unnecessary `sizeOf_spec` lemmas which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- The type of signs. -/
inductive SignType
| zero
| neg
| pos
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
namespace SignType
instance : Zero SignType :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One SignType :=
⟨pos⟩
instance : Neg SignType :=
⟨fun s =>
match s with
| neg => pos
| zero => zero
| pos => neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_zero : zero = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_neg_one : neg = -1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pos_eq_one : pos = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Mul SignType :=
⟨fun x y =>
match x with
| neg => -y
| zero => zero
| pos => y⟩
/-- The less-than-or-equal relation on signs. -/
protected inductive LE : SignType → SignType → Prop
| of_neg (a) : SignType.LE neg a
| zero : SignType.LE zero zero
| of_pos (a) : SignType.LE a pos
instance : LE SignType :=
⟨SignType.LE⟩
instance LE.decidableRel : DecidableRel SignType.LE := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
instance decidableEq : DecidableEq SignType := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
private lemma mul_comm : ∀ (a b : SignType), a * b = b * a := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
private lemma mul_assoc : ∀ (a b c : SignType), (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
/- We can define a `Field` instance on `SignType`, but it's not mathematically sensible,
so we only define the `CommGroupWithZero`. -/
instance : CommGroupWithZero SignType where
zero := 0
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
inv := id
mul_zero a := by cases a <;> rfl
zero_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_one a := by cases a <;> rfl
one_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_inv_cancel a ha := by cases a <;> trivial
mul_comm := mul_comm
mul_assoc := mul_assoc
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by rintro ⟨_⟩⟩
inv_zero := rfl
private lemma le_antisymm (a b : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ a) : a = b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> trivial
private lemma le_trans (a b c : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> tauto
instance : LinearOrder SignType where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := by cases a <;> constructor
le_total a b := by cases a <;> cases b <;> first | left; constructor | right; constructor
le_antisymm := le_antisymm
le_trans := le_trans
toDecidableLE := LE.decidableRel
toDecidableEq := SignType.decidableEq
instance : BoundedOrder SignType where
top := 1
le_top := LE.of_pos
bot := -1
bot_le :=
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6053
Added `by exact`, but don't understand why it was needed. -/
by exact LE.of_neg
instance : HasDistribNeg SignType :=
{ neg_neg := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl
neg_mul := fun x y => by cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
mul_neg := fun x y => by cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl }
/-- `SignType` is equivalent to `Fin 3`. -/
def fin3Equiv : SignType ≃* Fin 3 where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 => ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 1 => ⟨1, by simp⟩
| -1 => ⟨2, by simp⟩
invFun a :=
match a with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => 0
| ⟨1, _⟩ => 1
| ⟨2, _⟩ => -1
left_inv a := by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv a :=
match a with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => by simp
| ⟨1, _⟩ => by simp
| ⟨2, _⟩ => by simp
map_mul' a b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
section CaseBashing
theorem nonneg_iff {a : SignType} : 0 ≤ a ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by decide +revert
theorem nonneg_iff_ne_neg_one {a : SignType} : 0 ≤ a ↔ a ≠ -1 := by decide +revert
theorem neg_one_lt_iff {a : SignType} : -1 < a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by decide +revert
theorem nonpos_iff {a : SignType} : a ≤ 0 ↔ a = -1 ∨ a = 0 := by decide +revert
theorem nonpos_iff_ne_one {a : SignType} : a ≤ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := by decide +revert
theorem lt_one_iff {a : SignType} : a < 1 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_iff {a : SignType} : a < 0 ↔ a = -1 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem le_neg_one_iff {a : SignType} : a ≤ -1 ↔ a = -1 :=
le_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem pos_iff {a : SignType} : 0 < a ↔ a = 1 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem one_le_iff {a : SignType} : 1 ≤ a ↔ a = 1 :=
top_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_le (a : SignType) : -1 ≤ a :=
bot_le
@[simp]
theorem le_one (a : SignType) : a ≤ 1 :=
le_top
@[simp]
theorem not_lt_neg_one (a : SignType) : ¬a < -1 :=
not_lt_bot
@[simp]
theorem not_one_lt (a : SignType) : ¬1 < a :=
not_top_lt
@[simp]
theorem self_eq_neg_iff (a : SignType) : a = -a ↔ a = 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff (a : SignType) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_lt_one : (-1 : SignType) < 1 :=
bot_lt_top
end CaseBashing
section cast
variable {α : Type*} [Zero α] [One α] [Neg α]
/-- Turn a `SignType` into zero, one, or minus one. This is a coercion instance. -/
@[coe]
def cast : SignType → α
| zero => 0
| pos => 1
| neg => -1
/-- This is a `CoeTail` since the type on the right (trivially) determines the type on the left.
`outParam`-wise it could be a `Coe`, but we don't want to try applying this instance for a
coercion to any `α`.
-/
instance : CoeTail SignType α :=
⟨cast⟩
/-- Casting out of `SignType` respects composition with functions preserving `0, 1, -1`. -/
lemma map_cast' {β : Type*} [One β] [Neg β] [Zero β]
(f : α → β) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (h₂ : f 0 = 0) (h₃ : f (-1) = -1) (s : SignType) :
f s = s := by
cases s <;> simp only [SignType.cast, h₁, h₂, h₃]
/-- Casting out of `SignType` respects composition with suitable bundled homomorphism types. -/
lemma map_cast {α β F : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] [One β] [SubtractionMonoid β]
[FunLike F α β] [AddMonoidHomClass F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (f : F) (s : SignType) :
f s = s := by
apply map_cast' <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : SignType) = (0 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : SignType) = (1 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : SignType) = (-1 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_neg {α : Type*} [One α] [SubtractionMonoid α] (s : SignType) :
(↑(-s) : α) = -↑s := by
cases s <;> simp
/-- Casting `SignType → ℤ → α` is the same as casting directly `SignType → α`. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_cast {α : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] (s : SignType) : ((s : ℤ) : α) = s :=
map_cast' _ Int.cast_one Int.cast_zero (@Int.cast_one α _ ▸ Int.cast_neg 1) _
end cast
/-- `SignType.cast` as a `MulWithZeroHom`. -/
@[simps]
def castHom {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α] : SignType →*₀ α where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [zero_eq_zero, pos_eq_one, neg_eq_neg_one]
theorem univ_eq : (Finset.univ : Finset SignType) = {0, -1, 1} := by
decide
theorem range_eq {α} (f : SignType → α) : Set.range f = {f zero, f neg, f pos} := by
classical rw [← Fintype.coe_image_univ, univ_eq]
classical simp [Finset.coe_insert]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a b : SignType) :
↑(a * b) = (a : α) * b :=
map_mul SignType.castHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow {α} [MonoidWithZero α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a : SignType) (k : ℕ) :
↑(a ^ k) = (a : α) ^ k :=
map_pow SignType.castHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zpow {α} [GroupWithZero α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a : SignType) (k : ℤ) :
↑(a ^ k) = (a : α) ^ k :=
map_zpow₀ SignType.castHom _ _
end SignType
-- The lemma `exists_signed_sum` needs explicit universe handling in its statement.
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open SignType
section Preorder
variable [Zero α] [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] {a : α}
/-- The sign of an element is 1 if it's positive, -1 if negative, 0 otherwise. -/
def SignType.sign : α →o SignType :=
⟨fun a => if 0 < a then 1 else if a < 0 then -1 else 0, fun a b h => by
dsimp
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ _ _ h₂ h₃ <;> try constructor
· cases lt_irrefl 0 (h₁.trans <| h.trans_lt h₃)
· cases h₂ (h₁.trans_le h)
· cases h₄ (h.trans_lt h₃)⟩
theorem sign_apply : sign a = ite (0 < a) 1 (ite (a < 0) (-1) 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : sign (0 : α) = 0 := by simp [sign_apply]
@[simp]
theorem sign_pos (ha : 0 < a) : sign a = 1 := by rwa [sign_apply, if_pos]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (ha : a < 0) : sign a = -1 := by rwa [sign_apply, if_neg <| asymm ha, if_pos]
theorem sign_eq_one_iff : sign a = 1 ↔ 0 < a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sign_pos h⟩
by_contra hn
rw [sign_apply, if_neg hn] at h
split_ifs at h
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_iff : sign a = -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sign_neg h⟩
rw [sign_apply] at h
split_ifs at h
assumption
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Zero α] [LinearOrder α] {a : α}
/-- `SignType.sign` respects strictly monotone zero-preserving maps. -/
lemma StrictMono.sign_comp {β F : Type*} [Zero β] [Preorder β] [DecidableLT β]
[FunLike F α β] [ZeroHomClass F α β] {f : F} (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) :
sign (f a) = sign a := by
simp only [sign_apply, ← map_zero f, hf.lt_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff : sign a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ sign_zero⟩
rw [sign_apply] at h
split_ifs at h with h_1 h_2
cases h
exact (le_of_not_lt h_1).eq_of_not_lt h_2
theorem sign_ne_zero : sign a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
sign_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp]
theorem sign_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ sign a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 a with (h | h | h)
· simp [h, h.le]
· simp [← h]
· simp [h, h.not_le]
@[simp]
theorem sign_nonpos_iff : sign a ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 a with (h | h | h)
· simp [h, h.not_le]
· simp [← h]
· simp [h, h.le]
end LinearOrder
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [DecidableLT α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem sign_one : sign (1 : α) = 1 :=
sign_pos zero_lt_one
|
end OrderedSemiring
section OrderedRing
| Mathlib/Data/Sign.lean | 377 | 381 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Basic
/-!
# Index of a Subgroup
In this file we define the index of a subgroup, and prove several divisibility properties.
Several theorems proved in this file are known as Lagrange's theorem.
## Main definitions
- `H.index` : the index of `H : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite.
- `H.relindex K` : the relative index of `H : Subgroup G` in `K : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite.
# Main results
- `card_mul_index` : `Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G`
- `index_mul_card` : `H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G`
- `index_dvd_card` : `H.index ∣ Fintype.card G`
- `relindex_mul_index` : If `H ≤ K`, then `H.relindex K * K.index = H.index`
- `index_dvd_of_le` : If `H ≤ K`, then `K.index ∣ H.index`
- `relindex_mul_relindex` : `relindex` is multiplicative in towers
- `MulAction.index_stabilizer`: the index of the stabilizer is the cardinality of the orbit
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
open Cardinal Function
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] (H K L : Subgroup G)
/-- The index of a subgroup as a natural number. Returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The index of an additive subgroup as a natural number.
Returns 0 if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def index : ℕ :=
Nat.card (G ⧸ H)
/-- If `H` and `K` are subgroups of a group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ` is the index
of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "If `H` and `K` are subgroups of an additive group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ`
is the index of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def relindex : ℕ :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap_of_surjective {f : G' →* G} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.comap f).index = H.index := by
have key : ∀ x y : G',
QuotientGroup.leftRel (H.comap f) x y ↔ QuotientGroup.leftRel H (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
exact fun x y => iff_of_eq (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]))
refine Cardinal.toNat_congr (Equiv.ofBijective (Quotient.map' f fun x y => (key x y).mp) ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [← Quotient.eq''] at key
refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
refine Quotient.ind' fun y => ?_
exact (key x y).mpr
· refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, (Quotient.map'_mk'' f _ y).trans (congr_arg Quotient.mk'' hy)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap (f : G' →* G) :
(H.comap f).index = H.relindex f.range :=
Eq.trans (congr_arg index (by rfl))
((H.subgroupOf f.range).index_comap_of_surjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_comap (f : G' →* G) (K : Subgroup G') :
relindex (comap f H) K = relindex H (map f K) := by
rw [relindex, subgroupOf, comap_comap, index_comap, ← f.map_range, K.range_subtype]
| variable {H K L}
@[to_additive relindex_mul_index]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Index.lean | 89 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by
rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop]
· simpa only [finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulSupport_mulIndicator]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the value of `g` at the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `g (f i)` over `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an additive monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the
value of `g` at the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `g (f i)` over `s`."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem (f : α → M) (g : M →* N) (hs : s.Finite) :
| g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_mem' (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 629 | 632 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Kevin Klinge, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.DistribMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
/-!
# Localization over left Ore sets.
This file proves results on the localization of rings (monoids with zeros) over a left Ore set.
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Ore+localization>
* [Zoran Škoda, *Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry*][skoda2006]
## Tags
localization, Ore, non-commutative
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
universe u
open OreLocalization
namespace OreLocalization
section MonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [MonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv' (s : S) : (0 : R) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp [Submonoid.smul_def]⟩
instance : MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
zero_mul x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_mul_char 0 r 1 s 0 1 (by simp), zero_mul, one_mul]
mul_zero x := by
induction' x using OreLocalization.ind with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, mul_div_one, mul_zero, zero_oreDiv', zero_oreDiv']
end MonoidWithZero
section CommMonoidWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
instance : CommMonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (MonoidWithZero R[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid R[S⁻¹])
end CommMonoidWithZero
section DistribMulAction
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S] {X : Type*} [AddMonoid X]
variable [DistribMulAction R X]
private def add'' (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] :=
(oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₁ + oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ • r₂) /ₒ (oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ * s₁)
private theorem add''_char (r₁ : X) (s₁ : S) (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(hb : sb * s₁ = rb * s₂) (h : sb * s₁ ∈ S) :
add'' r₁ s₁ r₂ s₂ = (sb • r₁ + rb • r₂) /ₒ ⟨sb * s₁, h⟩ := by
simp only [add'']
have ha := ore_eq (s₁ : R) s₂
generalize oreNum (s₁ : R) s₂ = ra at *
generalize oreDenom (s₁ : R) s₂ = sa at *
rw [oreDiv_eq_iff]
rcases oreCondition sb sa with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
have : sc * rb * s₂ = rc * ra * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc rc, ← ha, ← mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, hb]
rcases ore_right_cancel _ _ s₂ this with ⟨sd, hd⟩
use sd * sc
use sd * rc
simp only [smul_add, smul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul]
constructor
· rw [mul_assoc _ _ rb, hd, mul_assoc, hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc (sc : R), hc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
attribute [local instance] OreLocalization.oreEqv
private def add' (r₂ : X) (s₂ : S) : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
(--plus tilde
Quotient.lift
fun r₁s₁ : X × S => add'' r₁s₁.1 r₁s₁.2 r₂ s₂) <| by
-- Porting note: `assoc_rw` & `noncomm_ring` were not ported yet
rintro ⟨r₁', s₁'⟩ ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
-- s*, r*
rcases oreCondition (s₁' : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
--s~~, r~~
rcases oreCondition rb sc with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
-- s#, r#
dsimp at *
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₁').2]
have : sd * sb * s₁ = rd * rc * s₂ := by
rw [mul_assoc, hb', ← mul_assoc, hd, mul_assoc, hc, ← mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ (rd * rc : R) (sd * sb) this (sd * sb * s₁).2]
rw [mul_smul, ← Submonoid.smul_def sb, hb, smul_smul, hd, oreDiv_eq_iff]
use 1
use rd
simp only [mul_smul, smul_add, one_smul, OneMemClass.coe_one, one_mul, true_and]
rw [this, hc, mul_assoc]
/-- The addition on the Ore localization. -/
@[irreducible]
private def add : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := fun x =>
Quotient.lift (fun rs : X × S => add' rs.1 rs.2 x)
(by
rintro ⟨r₁, s₁⟩ ⟨r₂, s₂⟩ ⟨sb, rb, hb, hb'⟩
induction' x with r₃ s₃
show add'' _ _ _ _ = add'' _ _ _ _
dsimp only at *
rcases oreCondition (s₃ : R) s₂ with ⟨rc, sc, hc⟩
rcases oreCondition rc sb with ⟨rd, sd, hd⟩
have : rd * rb * s₁ = sd * sc * s₃ := by
rw [mul_assoc, ← hb', ← mul_assoc, ← hd, mul_assoc, ← hc, mul_assoc]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ rc sc hc (sc * s₃).2]
rw [add''_char _ _ _ _ _ _ this.symm (sd * sc * s₃).2]
refine oreDiv_eq_iff.mpr ?_
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, smul_add]
use sd, 1
simp only [one_smul, one_mul, mul_smul, ← hb, Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_assoc, and_true]
simp only [smul_smul, hd])
instance : Add X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨add⟩
theorem oreDiv_add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s s' : S} :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' =
(oreDenom (s : R) s' • r + oreNum (s : R) s' • r') /ₒ (oreDenom (s : R) s' * s) := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
theorem oreDiv_add_char' {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : R)
(h : sb * s = rb * s') (h' : sb * s ∈ S) :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ ⟨sb * s, h'⟩ := by
with_unfolding_all exact add''_char r s r' s' rb sb h h'
/-- A characterization of the addition on the Ore localizaion, allowing for arbitrary Ore
numerator and Ore denominator. -/
theorem oreDiv_add_char {r r' : X} (s s' : S) (rb : R) (sb : S) (h : sb * s = rb * s') :
r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (sb • r + rb • r') /ₒ (sb * s) :=
oreDiv_add_char' s s' rb sb h (sb * s).2
/-- Another characterization of the addition on the Ore localization, bundling up all witnesses
and conditions into a sigma type. -/
def oreDivAddChar' (r r' : X) (s s' : S) :
Σ'r'' : R,
Σ's'' : S, s'' * s = r'' * s' ∧ r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s' = (s'' • r + r'' • r') /ₒ (s'' * s) :=
⟨oreNum (s : R) s', oreDenom (s : R) s', ore_eq (s : R) s', oreDiv_add_oreDiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_oreDiv {r r' : X} {s : S} : r /ₒ s + r' /ₒ s = (r + r') /ₒ s := by
simp [oreDiv_add_char s s 1 1 (by simp)]
protected theorem add_assoc (x y z : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'
rcases oreDivAddChar' (sa • r₁ + ra • r₂) r₃ (sa * s₁) s₃ with ⟨rc, sc, hc, q⟩; rw [q]; clear q
simp only [smul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
simp_rw [← add_oreDiv, ← OreLocalization.expand']
congr 2
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (ha.symm ▸ (sa * s₁).2)]; congr; ext; exact ha
· rw [OreLocalization.expand r₃ s₃ rc (hc.symm ▸ (sc * (sa * s₁)).2)]; congr; ext; exact hc
@[simp]
theorem zero_oreDiv (s : S) : (0 : X) /ₒ s = 0 := by
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, oreDiv_eq_iff]
exact ⟨s, 1, by simp⟩
protected theorem zero_add (x : X[S⁻¹]) : 0 + x = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
protected theorem add_zero (x : X[S⁻¹]) : x + 0 = x := by
induction x
rw [← zero_oreDiv, add_oreDiv]; simp
@[irreducible]
private def nsmul : ℕ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := nsmulRec
instance : AddMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_assoc := OreLocalization.add_assoc
zero_add := OreLocalization.zero_add
add_zero := OreLocalization.add_zero
nsmul := nsmul
nsmul_zero _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
nsmul_succ _ _ := by with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem smul_zero (x : R[S⁻¹]) : x • (0 : X[S⁻¹]) = 0 := by
induction' x with r s
rw [OreLocalization.zero_def, smul_div_one, smul_zero, zero_oreDiv, zero_oreDiv]
protected theorem smul_add (z : R[S⁻¹]) (x y : X[S⁻¹]) :
z • (x + y) = z • x + z • y := by
induction' x with r₁ s₁
induction' y with r₂ s₂
induction' z with r₃ s₃
rcases oreDivAddChar' r₁ r₂ s₁ s₂ with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩; rw [ha']; clear ha'; norm_cast at ha
rw [OreLocalization.expand' r₁ s₁ sa]
rw [OreLocalization.expand r₂ s₂ ra (by rw [← ha]; apply SetLike.coe_mem)]
rw [← Subtype.coe_eq_of_eq_mk ha]
repeat rw [oreDiv_smul_oreDiv]
simp only [smul_add, add_oreDiv]
instance : DistribMulAction R[S⁻¹] X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero := OreLocalization.smul_zero
smul_add := OreLocalization.smul_add
instance {R₀} [Monoid R₀] [MulAction R₀ X] [MulAction R₀ R]
[IsScalarTower R₀ R X] [IsScalarTower R₀ R R] :
DistribMulAction R₀ X[S⁻¹] where
smul_zero _ := by rw [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_zero]
smul_add _ _ _ := by simp only [← smul_one_oreDiv_one_smul, smul_add]
end DistribMulAction
section AddCommMonoid
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommMonoid X] [DistribMulAction R X]
protected theorem add_comm (x y : X[S⁻¹]) : x + y = y + x := by
induction' x with r s
induction' y with r' s'
rcases oreDivAddChar' r r' s s' with ⟨ra, sa, ha, ha'⟩
rw [ha', oreDiv_add_char' s' s _ _ ha.symm (ha ▸ (sa * s).2), add_comm]
congr; ext; exact ha
instance instAddCommMonoidOreLocalization : AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹] where
add_comm := OreLocalization.add_comm
end AddCommMonoid
section AddGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
/-- Negation on the Ore localization is defined via negation on the numerator. -/
@[irreducible]
protected def neg : X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] :=
liftExpand (fun (r : X) (s : S) => -r /ₒ s) fun r t s ht => by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
beta_reduce
rw [← smul_neg, ← OreLocalization.expand]
instance instNegOreLocalization : Neg X[S⁻¹] :=
⟨OreLocalization.neg⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem neg_def (r : X) (s : S) : -(r /ₒ s) = -r /ₒ s := by
with_unfolding_all rfl
protected theorem neg_add_cancel (x : X[S⁻¹]) : -x + x = 0 := by
induction' x with r s; simp
/-- `zsmul` of `OreLocalization` -/
@[irreducible]
protected def zsmul : ℤ → X[S⁻¹] → X[S⁻¹] := zsmulRec
unseal OreLocalization.zsmul in
instance instAddGroupOreLocalization : AddGroup X[S⁻¹] where
neg_add_cancel := OreLocalization.neg_add_cancel
zsmul := OreLocalization.zsmul
end AddGroup
section AddCommGroup
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] {S : Submonoid R} [OreSet S]
variable {X : Type*} [AddCommGroup X] [DistribMulAction R X]
instance : AddCommGroup X[S⁻¹] where
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddGroup X[S⁻¹])
__ := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid X[S⁻¹])
end AddCommGroup
end OreLocalization
| Mathlib/RingTheory/OreLocalization/Basic.lean | 766 | 771 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Ines Wright, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Solvable
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Sylow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Order
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator.Finite
/-!
# Nilpotent groups
An API for nilpotent groups, that is, groups for which the upper central series
reaches `⊤`.
## Main definitions
Recall that if `H K : Subgroup G` then `⁅H, K⁆ : Subgroup G` is the subgroup of `G` generated
by the commutators `hkh⁻¹k⁻¹`. Recall also Lean's conventions that `⊤` denotes the
subgroup `G` of `G`, and `⊥` denotes the trivial subgroup `{1}`.
* `upperCentralSeries G : ℕ → Subgroup G` : the upper central series of a group `G`.
This is an increasing sequence of normal subgroups `H n` of `G` with `H 0 = ⊥` and
`H (n + 1) / H n` is the centre of `G / H n`.
* `lowerCentralSeries G : ℕ → Subgroup G` : the lower central series of a group `G`.
This is a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups `H n` of `G` with `H 0 = ⊤` and
`H (n + 1) = ⁅H n, G⁆`.
* `IsNilpotent` : A group G is nilpotent if its upper central series reaches `⊤`, or
equivalently if its lower central series reaches `⊥`.
* `Group.nilpotencyClass` : the length of the upper central series of a nilpotent group.
* `IsAscendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop` and
* `IsDescendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop` : Note that in the literature
a "central series" for a group is usually defined to be a *finite* sequence of normal subgroups
`H 0`, `H 1`, ..., starting at `⊤`, finishing at `⊥`, and with each `H n / H (n + 1)`
central in `G / H (n + 1)`. In this formalisation it is convenient to have two weaker predicates
on an infinite sequence of subgroups `H n` of `G`: we say a sequence is a *descending central
series* if it starts at `G` and `⁅H n, ⊤⁆ ⊆ H (n + 1)` for all `n`. Note that this series
may not terminate at `⊥`, and the `H i` need not be normal. Similarly a sequence is an
*ascending central series* if `H 0 = ⊥` and `⁅H (n + 1), ⊤⁆ ⊆ H n` for all `n`, again with no
requirement that the series reaches `⊤` or that the `H i` are normal.
## Main theorems
`G` is *defined* to be nilpotent if the upper central series reaches `⊤`.
* `nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series` : `G` is nilpotent iff some ascending central
series reaches `⊤`.
* `nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series` : `G` is nilpotent iff some descending central
series reaches `⊥`.
* `nilpotent_iff_lower` : `G` is nilpotent iff the lower central series reaches `⊥`.
* The `Group.nilpotencyClass` can likewise be obtained from these equivalent
definitions, see `least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass`,
`least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass` and
`lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass`.
* If `G` is nilpotent, then so are its subgroups, images, quotients and preimages.
Binary and finite products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent.
Infinite products are nilpotent if their nilpotent class is bounded.
Corresponding lemmas about the `Group.nilpotencyClass` are provided.
* The `Group.nilpotencyClass` of `G ⧸ center G` is given explicitly, and an induction principle
is derived from that.
* `IsNilpotent.to_isSolvable`: If `G` is nilpotent, it is solvable.
## Warning
A "central series" is usually defined to be a finite sequence of normal subgroups going
from `⊥` to `⊤` with the property that each subquotient is contained within the centre of
the associated quotient of `G`. This means that if `G` is not nilpotent, then
none of what we have called `upperCentralSeries G`, `lowerCentralSeries G` or
the sequences satisfying `IsAscendingCentralSeries` or `IsDescendingCentralSeries`
are actually central series. Note that the fact that the upper and lower central series
are not central series if `G` is not nilpotent is a standard abuse of notation.
-/
open Subgroup
section WithGroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H]
/-- If `H` is a normal subgroup of `G`, then the set `{x : G | ∀ y : G, x*y*x⁻¹*y⁻¹ ∈ H}`
is a subgroup of `G` (because it is the preimage in `G` of the centre of the
quotient group `G/H`.)
-/
def upperCentralSeriesStep : Subgroup G where
carrier := { x : G | ∀ y : G, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' y := by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]
mul_mem' {a b} ha hb y := by
convert Subgroup.mul_mem _ (ha (b * y * b⁻¹)) (hb y) using 1
group
inv_mem' {x} hx y := by
specialize hx y⁻¹
rw [mul_assoc, inv_inv] at hx ⊢
exact Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm inferInstance hx
theorem mem_upperCentralSeriesStep (x : G) :
x ∈ upperCentralSeriesStep H ↔ ∀ y, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H := Iff.rfl
open QuotientGroup
/-- The proof that `upperCentralSeriesStep H` is the preimage of the centre of `G/H` under
the canonical surjection. -/
theorem upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center :
upperCentralSeriesStep H = Subgroup.comap (mk' H) (center (G ⧸ H)) := by
ext
rw [mem_comap, mem_center_iff, forall_mk]
apply forall_congr'
intro y
rw [coe_mk', ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, eq_comm, eq_iff_div_mem,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc]
instance : Normal (upperCentralSeriesStep H) := by
rw [upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center]
infer_instance
variable (G)
/-- An auxiliary type-theoretic definition defining both the upper central series of
a group, and a proof that it is normal, all in one go. -/
def upperCentralSeriesAux : ℕ → Σ'H : Subgroup G, Normal H
| 0 => ⟨⊥, inferInstance⟩
| n + 1 =>
let un := upperCentralSeriesAux n
let _un_normal := un.2
⟨upperCentralSeriesStep un.1, inferInstance⟩
/-- `upperCentralSeries G n` is the `n`th term in the upper central series of `G`. -/
def upperCentralSeries (n : ℕ) : Subgroup G :=
(upperCentralSeriesAux G n).1
instance upperCentralSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : Normal (upperCentralSeries G n) :=
(upperCentralSeriesAux G n).2
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_zero : upperCentralSeries G 0 = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_one : upperCentralSeries G 1 = center G := by
ext
simp only [upperCentralSeries, upperCentralSeriesAux, upperCentralSeriesStep,
Subgroup.mem_center_iff, mem_mk, mem_bot, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact forall_congr' fun y => by rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, eq_comm]
variable {G}
/-- The `n+1`st term of the upper central series `H i` has underlying set equal to the `x` such
that `⁅x,G⁆ ⊆ H n`. -/
theorem mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff {n : ℕ} {x : G} :
x ∈ upperCentralSeries G (n + 1) ↔ ∀ y : G, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ upperCentralSeries G n :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_upperCentralSeries {H : Type*} [Group H] (e : H ≃* G) :
∀ n, (upperCentralSeries G n).comap e = upperCentralSeries H n
| 0 => by simpa [MonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff] using e.injective
| n + 1 => by
ext
simp [mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff, ← comap_upperCentralSeries e n,
← e.toEquiv.forall_congr_right]
namespace Group
variable (G) in
-- `IsNilpotent` is already defined in the root namespace (for elements of rings).
-- TODO: Rename it to `IsNilpotentElement`?
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent if its upper central series is eventually `G`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsNilpotent (G : Type*) [Group G] : Prop where
nilpotent' : ∃ n : ℕ, upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤
lemma IsNilpotent.nilpotent (G : Type*) [Group G] [IsNilpotent G] :
∃ n : ℕ, upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤ := Group.IsNilpotent.nilpotent'
lemma isNilpotent_congr {H : Type*} [Group H] (e : G ≃* H) : IsNilpotent G ↔ IsNilpotent H := by
simp_rw [isNilpotent_iff]
refine exists_congr fun n ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· simp [← Subgroup.comap_top e.symm.toMonoidHom, ← h]
· simp [← Subgroup.comap_top e.toMonoidHom, ← h]
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_top : IsNilpotent (⊤ : Subgroup G) ↔ IsNilpotent G :=
isNilpotent_congr Subgroup.topEquiv
variable (G) in
/-- A group `G` is virtually nilpotent if it has a nilpotent cofinite subgroup `N`. -/
def IsVirtuallyNilpotent : Prop := ∃ N : Subgroup G, IsNilpotent N ∧ FiniteIndex N
lemma IsNilpotent.isVirtuallyNilpotent (hG : IsNilpotent G) : IsVirtuallyNilpotent G :=
⟨⊤, by simpa, inferInstance⟩
end Group
open Group
/-- A sequence of subgroups of `G` is an ascending central series if `H 0` is trivial and
`⁅H (n + 1), G⁆ ⊆ H n` for all `n`. Note that we do not require that `H n = G` for some `n`. -/
def IsAscendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop :=
H 0 = ⊥ ∧ ∀ (x : G) (n : ℕ), x ∈ H (n + 1) → ∀ g, x * g * x⁻¹ * g⁻¹ ∈ H n
/-- A sequence of subgroups of `G` is a descending central series if `H 0` is `G` and
`⁅H n, G⁆ ⊆ H (n + 1)` for all `n`. Note that we do not require that `H n = {1}` for some `n`. -/
def IsDescendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) :=
H 0 = ⊤ ∧ ∀ (x : G) (n : ℕ), x ∈ H n → ∀ g, x * g * x⁻¹ * g⁻¹ ∈ H (n + 1)
/-- Any ascending central series for a group is bounded above by the upper central series. -/
theorem ascending_central_series_le_upper (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) (hH : IsAscendingCentralSeries H) :
∀ n : ℕ, H n ≤ upperCentralSeries G n
| 0 => hH.1.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥
| | n + 1 => by
intro x hx
rw [mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff]
exact fun y => ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n (hH.2 x n hx y)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Nilpotent.lean | 210 | 214 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.LeftHomology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
/-!
# Right Homology of short complexes
In this file, we define the dual notions to those defined in
`Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.LeftHomology`. In particular, if `S : ShortComplex C` is
a short complex consisting of two composable maps `f : X₁ ⟶ X₂` and `g : X₂ ⟶ X₃` such
that `f ≫ g = 0`, we define `h : S.RightHomologyData` to be the datum of morphisms
`p : X₂ ⟶ Q` and `ι : H ⟶ Q` such that `Q` identifies to the cokernel of `f` and `H`
to the kernel of the induced map `g' : Q ⟶ X₃`.
When such a `S.RightHomologyData` exists, we shall say that `[S.HasRightHomology]`
and we define `S.rightHomology` to be the `H` field of a chosen right homology data.
Similarly, we define `S.opcycles` to be the `Q` field.
In `Homology.lean`, when `S` has two compatible left and right homology data
(i.e. they give the same `H` up to a canonical isomorphism), we shall define
`[S.HasHomology]` and `S.homology`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
namespace ShortComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
(S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ S₃ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` consists of morphisms `p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q` and
`ι : H ⟶ Q` such that `p` identifies `Q` to the kernel of `f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`,
and that `ι` identifies `H` to the kernel of the induced map `g' : Q ⟶ S.X₃` -/
structure RightHomologyData where
/-- a choice of cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` -/
Q : C
/-- a choice of kernel of the induced morphism `S.g' : S.Q ⟶ X₃` -/
H : C
/-- the projection from `S.X₂` -/
p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q
/-- the inclusion of the (right) homology in the chosen cokernel of `S.f` -/
ι : H ⟶ Q
/-- the cokernel condition for `p` -/
wp : S.f ≫ p = 0
/-- `p : S.X₂ ⟶ Q` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` -/
hp : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ p wp)
/-- the kernel condition for `ι` -/
wι : ι ≫ hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ _ S.zero) = 0
/-- `ι : H ⟶ Q` is a kernel of `S.g' : Q ⟶ S.X₃` -/
hι : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι ι wι)
initialize_simps_projections RightHomologyData (-hp, -hι)
namespace RightHomologyData
/-- The chosen cokernels and kernels of the limits API give a `RightHomologyData` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel
[HasCokernel S.f] [HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.RightHomologyData :=
{ Q := cokernel S.f,
H := kernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero),
p := cokernel.π _,
ι := kernel.ι _,
wp := cokernel.condition _,
hp := cokernelIsCokernel _,
wι := kernel.condition _,
hι := kernelIsKernel _, }
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] wp wι
variable {S}
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) {A : C}
instance : Epi h.p := ⟨fun _ _ => Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext h.hp⟩
instance : Mono h.ι := ⟨fun _ _ => Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext h.hι⟩
/-- Any morphism `k : S.X₂ ⟶ A` such that `S.f ≫ k = 0` descends
to a morphism `Q ⟶ A` -/
def descQ (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.Q ⟶ A :=
h.hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_descQ (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.p ≫ h.descQ k hk = k :=
h.hp.fac _ WalkingParallelPair.one
/-- The morphism from the (right) homology attached to a morphism
`k : S.X₂ ⟶ A` such that `S.f ≫ k = 0`. -/
@[simp]
def descH (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (hk : S.f ≫ k = 0) : h.H ⟶ A :=
h.ι ≫ h.descQ k hk
/-- The morphism `h.Q ⟶ S.X₃` induced by `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` and the fact that
`h.Q` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
def g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃ := h.descQ S.g S.zero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma p_g' : h.p ≫ h.g' = S.g := p_descQ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] lemma ι_g' : h.ι ≫ h.g' = 0 := h.wι
@[reassoc]
lemma ι_descQ_eq_zero_of_boundary (k : S.X₂ ⟶ A) (x : S.X₃ ⟶ A) (hx : k = S.g ≫ x) :
h.ι ≫ h.descQ k (by rw [hx, S.zero_assoc, zero_comp]) = 0 := by
rw [show 0 = h.ι ≫ h.g' ≫ x by simp]
congr 1
simp only [← cancel_epi h.p, hx, p_descQ, p_g'_assoc]
/-- For `h : S.RightHomologyData`, this is a restatement of `h.hι`, saying that
`ι : h.H ⟶ h.Q` is a kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
def hι' : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι h.ι h.ι_g') := h.hι
/-- The morphism `A ⟶ H` induced by a morphism `k : A ⟶ Q` such that `k ≫ g' = 0` -/
def liftH (k : A ⟶ h.Q) (hk : k ≫ h.g' = 0) : A ⟶ h.H :=
h.hι.lift (KernelFork.ofι k hk)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftH_ι (k : A ⟶ h.Q) (hk : k ≫ h.g' = 0) : h.liftH k hk ≫ h.ι = k :=
h.hι.fac (KernelFork.ofι k hk) WalkingParallelPair.zero
lemma isIso_p (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso h.p :=
⟨h.descQ (𝟙 S.X₂) (by rw [hf, comp_id]), p_descQ _ _ _, by
simp only [← cancel_epi h.p, p_descQ_assoc, id_comp, comp_id]⟩
lemma isIso_ι (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso h.ι := by
have ⟨φ, hφ⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' h.hι' (𝟙 _)
(by rw [← cancel_epi h.p, id_comp, p_g', comp_zero, hg])
dsimp at hφ
exact ⟨φ, by rw [← cancel_mono h.ι, assoc, hφ, comp_id, id_comp], hφ⟩
variable (S)
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by any limit kernel fork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := S.X₂
H := c.pt
p := 𝟙 _
ι := c.ι
wp := by rw [comp_id, hf]
hp := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
wι := KernelFork.condition _
hι := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc (Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
@[simp] lemma ofIsLimitKernelFork_g' (hf : S.f = 0) (c : KernelFork S.g)
(hc : IsLimit c) : (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).g' = S.g := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc).p, p_g',
ofIsLimitKernelFork_p, id_comp]
/-- When the first map `S.f` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given by
the chosen `kernel S.g` -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def ofHasKernel [HasKernel S.g] (hf : S.f = 0) : S.RightHomologyData :=
ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf _ (kernelIsKernel _)
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by any colimit cokernel cofork of `S.g` -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
S.RightHomologyData where
Q := c.pt
H := c.pt
p := c.π
ι := 𝟙 _
wp := CokernelCofork.condition _
hp := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc (Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp))
wι := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simp [hg])
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ (Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by simp [hg]))
@[simp] lemma ofIsColimitCokernelCofork_g' (hg : S.g = 0) (c : CokernelCofork S.f)
(hc : IsColimit c) : (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).g' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi (ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc).p, p_g', hg, comp_zero]
/-- When the second map `S.g` is zero, this is the right homology data on `S` given
by the chosen `cokernel S.f` -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def ofHasCokernel [HasCokernel S.f] (hg : S.g = 0) : S.RightHomologyData :=
ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg _ (cokernelIsCokernel _)
/-- When both `S.f` and `S.g` are zero, the middle object `S.X₂`
gives a right homology data on S -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) : S.RightHomologyData where
Q := S.X₂
H := S.X₂
p := 𝟙 _
ι := 𝟙 _
wp := by rw [comp_id, hf]
hp := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofId _ hf
wι := by
change 𝟙 _ ≫ S.g = 0
simp only [hg, comp_zero]
hι := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofId _ hg
@[simp]
lemma ofZeros_g' (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0) :
(ofZeros S hf hg).g' = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_epi ((ofZeros S hf hg).p), comp_zero, p_g', hg]
end RightHomologyData
/-- A short complex `S` has right homology when there exists a `S.RightHomologyData` -/
class HasRightHomology : Prop where
condition : Nonempty S.RightHomologyData
/-- A chosen `S.RightHomologyData` for a short complex `S` that has right homology -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyData [HasRightHomology S] :
S.RightHomologyData := HasRightHomology.condition.some
variable {S}
namespace HasRightHomology
lemma mk' (h : S.RightHomologyData) : HasRightHomology S := ⟨Nonempty.intro h⟩
instance of_hasCokernel_of_hasKernel
[HasCokernel S.f] [HasKernel (cokernel.desc S.f S.g S.zero)] :
S.HasRightHomology := HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernelOfHasKernel S)
instance of_hasKernel {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) (X : C) [HasKernel g] :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) g zero_comp).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasKernel _ rfl)
instance of_hasCokernel {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [HasCokernel f] :
(ShortComplex.mk f (0 : Y ⟶ Z) comp_zero).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofHasCokernel _ rfl)
instance of_zeros (X Y Z : C) :
(ShortComplex.mk (0 : X ⟶ Y) (0 : Y ⟶ Z) zero_comp).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (RightHomologyData.ofZeros _ rfl rfl)
end HasRightHomology
namespace RightHomologyData
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` induces a left homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.RightHomologyData) : S.op.LeftHomologyData where
K := Opposite.op h.Q
H := Opposite.op h.H
i := h.p.op
π := h.ι.op
wi := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wp
hi := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ h.hp
wπ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wι
hπ := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ h.hι
@[simp] lemma op_f' (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.op.f' = h.g'.op := rfl
/-- A right homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a left homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.RightHomologyData) : S.unop.LeftHomologyData where
K := Opposite.unop h.Q
H := Opposite.unop h.H
i := h.p.unop
π := h.ι.unop
wi := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wp
hi := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπUnop _ _ h.hp
wπ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wι
hπ := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιUnop _ _ h.hι
@[simp] lemma unop_f' {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
h.unop.f' = h.g'.unop := rfl
end RightHomologyData
namespace LeftHomologyData
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` induces a right homology data for `S.op`. -/
@[simps]
def op (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : S.op.RightHomologyData where
Q := Opposite.op h.K
H := Opposite.op h.H
p := h.i.op
ι := h.π.op
wp := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wi
hp := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιOp _ _ h.hi
wι := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj h.wπ
hι := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπOp _ _ h.hπ
@[simp] lemma op_g' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.op.g' = h.f'.op := rfl
/-- A left homology data for a short complex `S` in the opposite category
induces a right homology data for `S.unop`. -/
@[simps]
def unop {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.LeftHomologyData) : S.unop.RightHomologyData where
Q := Opposite.unop h.K
H := Opposite.unop h.H
p := h.i.unop
ι := h.π.unop
wp := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wi
hp := KernelFork.IsLimit.ofιUnop _ _ h.hi
wι := Quiver.Hom.op_inj h.wπ
hι := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπUnop _ _ h.hπ
@[simp] lemma unop_g' {S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} (h : S.LeftHomologyData) :
h.unop.g' = h.f'.unop := rfl
end LeftHomologyData
instance [S.HasLeftHomology] : HasRightHomology S.op :=
HasRightHomology.mk' S.leftHomologyData.op
instance [S.HasRightHomology] : HasLeftHomology S.op :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' S.rightHomologyData.op
lemma hasLeftHomology_iff_op (S : ShortComplex C) :
S.HasLeftHomology ↔ S.op.HasRightHomology :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => HasLeftHomology.mk' S.op.rightHomologyData.unop⟩
lemma hasRightHomology_iff_op (S : ShortComplex C) :
S.HasRightHomology ↔ S.op.HasLeftHomology :=
⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => HasRightHomology.mk' S.op.leftHomologyData.unop⟩
lemma hasLeftHomology_iff_unop (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) :
S.HasLeftHomology ↔ S.unop.HasRightHomology :=
S.unop.hasRightHomology_iff_op.symm
lemma hasRightHomology_iff_unop (S : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ) :
S.HasRightHomology ↔ S.unop.HasLeftHomology :=
S.unop.hasLeftHomology_iff_op.symm
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
/-- Given right homology data `h₁` and `h₂` for two short complexes `S₁` and `S₂`,
a `RightHomologyMapData` for a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂`
consists of a description of the induced morphisms on the `Q` (opcycles)
and `H` (right homology) fields of `h₁` and `h₂`. -/
structure RightHomologyMapData where
/-- the induced map on opcycles -/
φQ : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q
/-- the induced map on right homology -/
φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H
/-- commutation with `p` -/
commp : h₁.p ≫ φQ = φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `g'` -/
commg' : φQ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by aesop_cat
/-- commutation with `ι` -/
commι : φH ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.ι ≫ φQ := by aesop_cat
namespace RightHomologyMapData
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] commp commg' commι
/-- The right homology map data associated to the zero morphism between two short complexes. -/
@[simps]
def zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
RightHomologyMapData 0 h₁ h₂ where
φQ := 0
φH := 0
/-- The right homology map data associated to the identity morphism of a short complex. -/
@[simps]
def id (h : S.RightHomologyData) : RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S) h h where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := 𝟙 _
/-- The composition of right homology map data. -/
@[simps]
def comp {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {φ' : S₂ ⟶ S₃} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData} {h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (ψ' : RightHomologyMapData φ' h₂ h₃) :
RightHomologyMapData (φ ≫ φ') h₁ h₃ where
φQ := ψ.φQ ≫ ψ'.φQ
φH := ψ.φH ≫ ψ'.φH
instance : Subsingleton (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) :=
⟨fun ψ₁ ψ₂ => by
have hQ : ψ₁.φQ = ψ₂.φQ := by rw [← cancel_epi h₁.p, commp, commp]
have hH : ψ₁.φH = ψ₂.φH := by rw [← cancel_mono h₂.ι, commι, commι, hQ]
cases ψ₁
cases ψ₂
congr⟩
instance : Inhabited (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := ⟨by
let φQ : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q := h₁.descQ (φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p) (by rw [← φ.comm₁₂_assoc, h₂.wp, comp_zero])
have commg' : φQ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
rw [← cancel_epi h₁.p, RightHomologyData.p_descQ_assoc, assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g', φ.comm₂₃, RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc]
let φH : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := h₂.liftH (h₁.ι ≫ φQ)
(by rw [assoc, commg', RightHomologyData.ι_g'_assoc, zero_comp])
exact ⟨φQ, φH, by simp [φQ], commg', by simp [φH]⟩⟩
instance : Unique (RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) := Unique.mk' _
variable {φ h₁ h₂}
lemma congr_φH {γ₁ γ₂ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φH = γ₂.φH := by rw [eq]
lemma congr_φQ {γ₁ γ₂ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂} (eq : γ₁ = γ₂) : γ₁.φQ = γ₂.φQ := by rw [eq]
/-- When `S₁.f`, `S₁.g`, `S₂.f` and `S₂.g` are all zero, the action on right homology of a
morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` is given by the action `φ.τ₂` on the middle objects. -/
@[simps]
def ofZeros (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofZeros S₁ hf₁ hg₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S₂ hf₂ hg₂) where
φQ := φ.τ₂
φH := φ.τ₂
/-- When `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` are zero and we have chosen limit kernel forks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` respectively, the action on right homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsLimitKernelFork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hf₁ : S₁.f = 0) (c₁ : KernelFork S₁.g) (hc₁ : IsLimit c₁)
(hf₂ : S₂.f = 0) (c₂ : KernelFork S₂.g) (hc₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : c₁.ι ≫ φ.τ₂ = f ≫ c₂.ι) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₁ hf₁ c₁ hc₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S₂ hf₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φQ := φ.τ₂
φH := f
commg' := by simp only [RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork_g', φ.comm₂₃]
commι := comm.symm
/-- When `S₁.g` and `S₂.g` are zero and we have chosen colimit cokernel coforks `c₁` and `c₂`
for `S₁.f` and `S₂.f` respectively, the action on right homology of a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of
short complexes is given by the unique morphism `f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt` such that
`φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f`. -/
@[simps]
def ofIsColimitCokernelCofork (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hg₁ : S₁.g = 0) (c₁ : CokernelCofork S₁.f) (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁)
(hg₂ : S₂.g = 0) (c₂ : CokernelCofork S₂.f) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) (f : c₁.pt ⟶ c₂.pt)
(comm : φ.τ₂ ≫ c₂.π = c₁.π ≫ f) :
RightHomologyMapData φ (RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₁ hg₁ c₁ hc₁)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S₂ hg₂ c₂ hc₂) where
φQ := f
φH := f
commp := comm.symm
variable (S)
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the right homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the right homology data
`RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork` and `ofZeros` . -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsLimitKernelFork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : KernelFork S.g) (hc : IsLimit c) :
RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsLimitKernelFork S hf c hc)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg) where
φQ := 𝟙 _
φH := c.ι
/-- When both maps `S.f` and `S.g` of a short complex `S` are zero, this is the right homology map
data (for the identity of `S`) which relates the right homology data `ofZeros` and
`ofIsColimitCokernelCofork`. -/
@[simps]
def compatibilityOfZerosOfIsColimitCokernelCofork (hf : S.f = 0) (hg : S.g = 0)
(c : CokernelCofork S.f) (hc : IsColimit c) :
RightHomologyMapData (𝟙 S)
(RightHomologyData.ofZeros S hf hg)
(RightHomologyData.ofIsColimitCokernelCofork S hg c hc) where
φQ := c.π
φH := c.π
end RightHomologyMapData
end
section
variable (S)
variable [S.HasRightHomology]
/-- The right homology of a short complex,
given by the `H` field of a chosen right homology data. -/
noncomputable def rightHomology : C := S.rightHomologyData.H
-- `S.rightHomology` is the simp normal form.
@[simp] lemma rightHomologyData_H : S.rightHomologyData.H = S.rightHomology := rfl
/-- The "opcycles" of a short complex, given by the `Q` field of a chosen right homology data.
This is the dual notion to cycles. -/
noncomputable def opcycles : C := S.rightHomologyData.Q
/-- The canonical map `S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyι : S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.ι
/-- The projection `S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def pOpcycles : S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles := S.rightHomologyData.p
/-- The canonical map `S.opcycles ⟶ X₃`. -/
noncomputable def fromOpcycles : S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃ := S.rightHomologyData.g'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma f_pOpcycles : S.f ≫ S.pOpcycles = 0 := S.rightHomologyData.wp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_fromOpcycles : S.pOpcycles ≫ S.fromOpcycles = S.g := S.rightHomologyData.p_g'
instance : Epi S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp only [pOpcycles]
infer_instance
instance : Mono S.rightHomologyι := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyι]
infer_instance
lemma rightHomology_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.rightHomology) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ f₁ ≫ S.rightHomologyι = f₂ ≫ S.rightHomologyι := by
rw [cancel_mono]
@[ext]
lemma rightHomology_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : A ⟶ S.rightHomology)
(h : f₁ ≫ S.rightHomologyι = f₂ ≫ S.rightHomologyι) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [rightHomology_ext_iff]
lemma opcycles_ext_iff {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.opcycles ⟶ A) :
f₁ = f₂ ↔ S.pOpcycles ≫ f₁ = S.pOpcycles ≫ f₂ := by
rw [cancel_epi]
@[ext]
lemma opcycles_ext {A : C} (f₁ f₂ : S.opcycles ⟶ A)
(h : S.pOpcycles ≫ f₁ = S.pOpcycles ≫ f₂) : f₁ = f₂ := by
simpa only [opcycles_ext_iff]
lemma isIso_pOpcycles (hf : S.f = 0) : IsIso S.pOpcycles :=
RightHomologyData.isIso_p _ hf
/-- When `S.f = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ S.X₂`
induced by `S.pOpcycles`. -/
@[simps! inv]
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoX₂ (hf : S.f = 0) : S.opcycles ≅ S.X₂ := by
have := S.isIso_pOpcycles hf
exact (asIso S.pOpcycles).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoX₂_inv_hom_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
S.pOpcycles ≫ (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom = 𝟙 _ := (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoX₂_hom_inv_id (hf : S.f = 0) :
(S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom ≫ S.pOpcycles = 𝟙 _ := (S.opcyclesIsoX₂ hf).hom_inv_id
lemma isIso_rightHomologyι (hg : S.g = 0) : IsIso S.rightHomologyι :=
RightHomologyData.isIso_ι _ hg
/-- When `S.g = 0`, this is the canonical isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ S.rightHomology` induced
by `S.rightHomologyι`. -/
@[simps! inv]
noncomputable def opcyclesIsoRightHomology (hg : S.g = 0) : S.opcycles ≅ S.rightHomology := by
have := S.isIso_rightHomologyι hg
exact (asIso S.rightHomologyι).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoRightHomology_inv_hom_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
S.rightHomologyι ≫ (S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).inv_hom_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesIsoRightHomology_hom_inv_id (hg : S.g = 0) :
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom ≫ S.rightHomologyι = 𝟙 _ :=
(S.opcyclesIsoRightHomology hg).hom_inv_id
end
section
variable (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
/-- The (unique) right homology map data associated to a morphism of short complexes that
are both equipped with right homology data. -/
def rightHomologyMapData : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := default
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and right homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced right homology map `h₁.H ⟶ h₁.H`. -/
def rightHomologyMap' : h₁.H ⟶ h₂.H := (rightHomologyMapData φ _ _).φH
/-- Given a morphism `φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes and right homology data `h₁` and `h₂`
for `S₁` and `S₂` respectively, this is the induced morphism `h₁.K ⟶ h₁.K` on opcycles. -/
def opcyclesMap' : h₁.Q ⟶ h₂.Q := (rightHomologyMapData φ _ _).φQ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap' : h₁.p ≫ opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = φ.τ₂ ≫ h₂.p :=
RightHomologyMapData.commp _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesMap'_g' : opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.g' = h₁.g' ≫ φ.τ₃ := by
simp only [← cancel_epi h₁.p, assoc, φ.comm₂₃, p_opcyclesMap'_assoc,
RightHomologyData.p_g'_assoc, RightHomologyData.p_g']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyι_naturality' :
rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ ≫ h₂.ι = h₁.ι ≫ opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ :=
RightHomologyMapData.commι _
end
section
variable [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
/-- The (right) homology map `S₁.rightHomology ⟶ S₂.rightHomology` induced by a morphism
`S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyMap : S₁.rightHomology ⟶ S₂.rightHomology :=
rightHomologyMap' φ _ _
/-- The morphism `S₁.opcycles ⟶ S₂.opcycles` induced by a morphism `S₁ ⟶ S₂` of short complexes. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesMap : S₁.opcycles ⟶ S₂.opcycles :=
opcyclesMap' φ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_opcyclesMap : S₁.pOpcycles ≫ opcyclesMap φ = φ.τ₂ ≫ S₂.pOpcycles :=
p_opcyclesMap' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_naturality : opcyclesMap φ ≫ S₂.fromOpcycles = S₁.fromOpcycles ≫ φ.τ₃ :=
opcyclesMap'_g' _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyι_naturality :
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ S₂.rightHomologyι = S₁.rightHomologyι ≫ opcyclesMap φ :=
rightHomologyι_naturality' _ _ _
end
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma rightHomologyMap'_eq : rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φH :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φH (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
lemma opcyclesMap'_eq : opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂ = γ.φQ :=
RightHomologyMapData.congr_φQ (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
end RightHomologyMapData
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_id (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(RightHomologyMapData.id h).rightHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_id (h : S.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' (𝟙 S) h h = 𝟙 _ :=
(RightHomologyMapData.id h).opcyclesMap'_eq
variable (S)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_id [HasRightHomology S] :
rightHomologyMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
rightHomologyMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_id [HasRightHomology S] :
opcyclesMap (𝟙 S) = 𝟙 _ :=
opcyclesMap'_id _
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).rightHomologyMap'_eq
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap'_zero (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' 0 h₁ h₂ = 0 :=
(RightHomologyMapData.zero h₁ h₂).opcyclesMap'_eq
variable (S₁ S₂)
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_zero [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] :
rightHomologyMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
rightHomologyMap'_zero _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_zero [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] :
opcyclesMap (0 : S₁ ⟶ S₂) = 0 :=
opcyclesMap'_zero _ _
variable {S₁ S₂}
@[reassoc]
lemma rightHomologyMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData) :
rightHomologyMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = rightHomologyMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫
rightHomologyMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := rightHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.rightHomologyMap'_eq, γ₂.rightHomologyMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).rightHomologyMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.comp_φH]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesMap'_comp (φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃)
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) (h₃ : S₃.RightHomologyData) :
opcyclesMap' (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) h₁ h₃ = opcyclesMap' φ₁ h₁ h₂ ≫ opcyclesMap' φ₂ h₂ h₃ := by
let γ₁ := rightHomologyMapData φ₁ h₁ h₂
let γ₂ := rightHomologyMapData φ₂ h₂ h₃
rw [γ₁.opcyclesMap'_eq, γ₂.opcyclesMap'_eq, (γ₁.comp γ₂).opcyclesMap'_eq,
RightHomologyMapData.comp_φQ]
@[simp]
lemma rightHomologyMap_comp [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] [HasRightHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
rightHomologyMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = rightHomologyMap φ₁ ≫ rightHomologyMap φ₂ :=
rightHomologyMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma opcyclesMap_comp [HasRightHomology S₁] [HasRightHomology S₂] [HasRightHomology S₃]
(φ₁ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (φ₂ : S₂ ⟶ S₃) :
opcyclesMap (φ₁ ≫ φ₂) = opcyclesMap φ₁ ≫ opcyclesMap φ₂ :=
opcyclesMap'_comp _ _ _ _ _
attribute [simp] rightHomologyMap_comp opcyclesMap_comp
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `H` fields
of right homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def rightHomologyMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) : h₁.H ≅ h₂.H where
hom := rightHomologyMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := rightHomologyMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, rightHomologyMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, rightHomologyMap'_id]
instance isIso_rightHomologyMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (rightHomologyMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- An isomorphism of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂` induces an isomorphism on the `Q` fields
of right homology data of `S₁` and `S₂`. -/
@[simps]
def opcyclesMapIso' (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) : h₁.Q ≅ h₂.Q where
hom := opcyclesMap' e.hom h₁ h₂
inv := opcyclesMap' e.inv h₂ h₁
hom_inv_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap'_comp, e.hom_inv_id, opcyclesMap'_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap'_comp, e.inv_hom_id, opcyclesMap'_id]
instance isIso_opcyclesMap'_of_isIso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ]
(h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData) :
IsIso (opcyclesMap' φ h₁ h₂) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (opcyclesMapIso' (asIso φ) h₁ h₂).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.rightHomology ≅ S₂.rightHomology` induced by an isomorphism of
short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : S₁.rightHomology ≅ S₂.rightHomology where
hom := rightHomologyMap e.hom
inv := rightHomologyMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, rightHomologyMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← rightHomologyMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, rightHomologyMap_id]
instance isIso_rightHomologyMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] :
IsIso (rightHomologyMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (rightHomologyMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
/-- The isomorphism `S₁.opcycles ≅ S₂.opcycles` induced by an isomorphism
of short complexes `S₁ ≅ S₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesMapIso (e : S₁ ≅ S₂) [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : S₁.opcycles ≅ S₂.opcycles where
hom := opcyclesMap e.hom
inv := opcyclesMap e.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, e.hom_inv_id, opcyclesMap_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← opcyclesMap_comp, e.inv_hom_id, opcyclesMap_id]
instance isIso_opcyclesMap_of_iso (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [IsIso φ] [S₁.HasRightHomology]
[S₂.HasRightHomology] : IsIso (opcyclesMap φ) :=
(inferInstance : IsIso (opcyclesMapIso (asIso φ)).hom)
variable {S}
namespace RightHomologyData
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) [S.HasRightHomology]
/-- The isomorphism `S.rightHomology ≅ h.H` induced by a right homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyIso : S.rightHomology ≅ h.H :=
rightHomologyMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
/-- The isomorphism `S.opcycles ≅ h.Q` induced by a right homology data `h` for a
short complex `S`. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesIso : S.opcycles ≅ h.Q :=
opcyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl _) _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv : h.p ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv = S.pOpcycles := by
dsimp [pOpcycles, RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso]
simp only [p_opcyclesMap', id_τ₂, id_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma pOpcycles_comp_opcyclesIso_hom : S.pOpcycles ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom = h.p := by
simp only [← h.p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι :
h.rightHomologyIso.inv ≫ S.rightHomologyι = h.ι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp only [rightHomologyι, rightHomologyIso, opcyclesIso, rightHomologyMapIso',
opcyclesMapIso', Iso.refl]
rw [rightHomologyι_naturality']
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma rightHomologyIso_hom_comp_ι :
h.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ h.ι = S.rightHomologyι ≫ h.opcyclesIso.hom := by
simp only [← cancel_mono h.opcyclesIso.inv, ← cancel_epi h.rightHomologyIso.inv,
assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id, rightHomologyIso_inv_comp_rightHomologyι]
end RightHomologyData
namespace RightHomologyMapData
variable {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(γ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂)
lemma rightHomologyMap_eq [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
rightHomologyMap φ = h₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.inv := by
dsimp [RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso, rightHomologyMapIso']
rw [← γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, ← rightHomologyMap'_comp,
← rightHomologyMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma opcyclesMap_eq [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
opcyclesMap φ = h₁.opcyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φQ ≫ h₂.opcyclesIso.inv := by
dsimp [RightHomologyData.opcyclesIso, cyclesMapIso']
rw [← γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, ← opcyclesMap'_comp, ← opcyclesMap'_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl
lemma rightHomologyMap_comm [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
rightHomologyMap φ ≫ h₂.rightHomologyIso.hom = h₁.rightHomologyIso.hom ≫ γ.φH := by
simp only [γ.rightHomologyMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
lemma opcyclesMap_comm [S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
opcyclesMap φ ≫ h₂.opcyclesIso.hom = h₁.opcyclesIso.hom ≫ γ.φQ := by
simp only [γ.opcyclesMap_eq, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
end RightHomologyMapData
section
variable (C)
variable [HasKernels C] [HasCokernels C]
/-- The right homology functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C`, where the right homology of a
short complex `S` is understood as a kernel of the obvious map `S.fromOpcycles : S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃`
where `S.opcycles` is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyFunctor : ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.rightHomology
map := rightHomologyMap
/-- The opcycles functor `ShortComplex C ⥤ C` which sends a short complex `S` to `S.opcycles`
which is a cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def opcyclesFunctor :
ShortComplex C ⥤ C where
obj S := S.opcycles
map := opcyclesMap
/-- The natural transformation `S.rightHomology ⟶ S.opcycles` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def rightHomologyιNatTrans :
rightHomologyFunctor C ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C where
app S := rightHomologyι S
naturality := fun _ _ φ => rightHomologyι_naturality φ
/-- The natural transformation `S.X₂ ⟶ S.opcycles` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def pOpcyclesNatTrans :
ShortComplex.π₂ ⟶ opcyclesFunctor C where
app S := S.pOpcycles
/-- The natural transformation `S.opcycles ⟶ S.X₃` for all short complexes `S`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def fromOpcyclesNatTrans :
opcyclesFunctor C ⟶ π₃ where
app S := S.fromOpcycles
naturality := fun _ _ φ => fromOpcycles_naturality φ
end
/-- A left homology map data for a morphism of short complexes induces
a right homology map data in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def LeftHomologyMapData.op {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : RightHomologyMapData (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op where
φQ := ψ.φK.op
φH := ψ.φH.op
commp := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commg' := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commι := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
/-- A left homology map data for a morphism of short complexes in the opposite category
induces a right homology map data in the original category. -/
@[simps]
def LeftHomologyMapData.unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData}
(ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : RightHomologyMapData (unopMap φ) h₂.unop h₁.unop where
φQ := ψ.φK.unop
φH := ψ.φH.unop
commp := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commg' := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commι := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
/-- A right homology map data for a morphism of short complexes induces
a left homology map data in the opposite category. -/
@[simps]
def RightHomologyMapData.op {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : LeftHomologyMapData (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op where
φK := ψ.φQ.op
φH := ψ.φH.op
commi := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commf' := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
commπ := Quiver.Hom.unop_inj (by simp)
/-- A right homology map data for a morphism of short complexes in the opposite category
induces a left homology map data in the original category. -/
@[simps]
def RightHomologyMapData.unop {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex Cᵒᵖ} {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂}
{h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData}
(ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) : LeftHomologyMapData (unopMap φ) h₂.unop h₁.unop where
φK := ψ.φQ.unop
φH := ψ.φH.unop
commi := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commf' := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
commπ := Quiver.Hom.op_inj (by simp)
variable (S)
/-- The right homology in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the left homology of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def rightHomologyOpIso [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.op.rightHomology ≅ Opposite.op S.leftHomology :=
S.leftHomologyData.op.rightHomologyIso
/-- The left homology in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the right homology of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def leftHomologyOpIso [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.op.leftHomology ≅ Opposite.op S.rightHomology :=
S.rightHomologyData.op.leftHomologyIso
/-- The opcycles in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the cycles of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def opcyclesOpIso [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.op.opcycles ≅ Opposite.op S.cycles :=
S.leftHomologyData.op.opcyclesIso
/-- The cycles in the opposite category of the opposite of a short complex identifies
to the opcycles of this short complex. -/
noncomputable def cyclesOpIso [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.op.cycles ≅ Opposite.op S.opcycles :=
S.rightHomologyData.op.cyclesIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma opcyclesOpIso_hom_toCycles_op [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.opcyclesOpIso.hom ≫ S.toCycles.op = S.op.fromOpcycles := by
dsimp [opcyclesOpIso, toCycles]
rw [← cancel_epi S.op.pOpcycles, p_fromOpcycles,
RightHomologyData.pOpcycles_comp_opcyclesIso_hom_assoc,
LeftHomologyData.op_p, ← op_comp, LeftHomologyData.f'_i, op_g]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma fromOpcycles_op_cyclesOpIso_inv [S.HasRightHomology]:
S.fromOpcycles.op ≫ S.cyclesOpIso.inv = S.op.toCycles := by
dsimp [cyclesOpIso, fromOpcycles]
rw [← cancel_mono S.op.iCycles, assoc, toCycles_i,
LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso_inv_comp_iCycles, RightHomologyData.op_i,
← op_comp, RightHomologyData.p_g', op_f]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma op_pOpcycles_opcyclesOpIso_hom [S.HasLeftHomology] :
S.op.pOpcycles ≫ S.opcyclesOpIso.hom = S.iCycles.op := by
dsimp [opcyclesOpIso]
rw [← S.leftHomologyData.op.p_comp_opcyclesIso_inv, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma cyclesOpIso_inv_op_iCycles [S.HasRightHomology] :
S.cyclesOpIso.inv ≫ S.op.iCycles = S.pOpcycles.op := by
dsimp [cyclesOpIso]
rw [← S.rightHomologyData.op.cyclesIso_hom_comp_i, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesOpIso_hom_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
opcyclesMap (opMap φ) ≫ (S₁.opcyclesOpIso).hom =
S₂.opcyclesOpIso.hom ≫ (cyclesMap φ).op := by
rw [← cancel_epi S₂.op.pOpcycles, p_opcyclesMap_assoc, opMap_τ₂,
op_pOpcycles_opcyclesOpIso_hom, op_pOpcycles_opcyclesOpIso_hom_assoc, ← op_comp,
← op_comp, cyclesMap_i]
@[reassoc]
lemma opcyclesOpIso_inv_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
(cyclesMap φ).op ≫ (S₁.opcyclesOpIso).inv =
S₂.opcyclesOpIso.inv ≫ opcyclesMap (opMap φ) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (S₂.opcyclesOpIso.hom), Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc,
← opcyclesOpIso_hom_naturality_assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesOpIso_inv_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
(opcyclesMap φ).op ≫ (S₁.cyclesOpIso).inv =
S₂.cyclesOpIso.inv ≫ cyclesMap (opMap φ) := by
rw [← cancel_mono S₁.op.iCycles, assoc, assoc, cyclesOpIso_inv_op_iCycles, cyclesMap_i,
cyclesOpIso_inv_op_iCycles_assoc, ← op_comp, p_opcyclesMap, op_comp, opMap_τ₂]
@[reassoc]
lemma cyclesOpIso_hom_naturality (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
[S₁.HasRightHomology] [S₂.HasRightHomology] :
cyclesMap (opMap φ) ≫ (S₁.cyclesOpIso).hom =
S₂.cyclesOpIso.hom ≫ (opcyclesMap φ).op := by
rw [← cancel_mono (S₁.cyclesOpIso).inv, assoc, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id,
cyclesOpIso_inv_naturality, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma leftHomologyMap'_op
(φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) (h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) :
(leftHomologyMap' φ h₁ h₂).op = rightHomologyMap' (opMap φ) h₂.op h₁.op := by
let γ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂ := leftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂
simp only [γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, γ.op.rightHomologyMap'_eq,
LeftHomologyMapData.op_φH]
lemma leftHomologyMap_op (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂) [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology] :
(leftHomologyMap φ).op = S₂.rightHomologyOpIso.inv ≫ rightHomologyMap (opMap φ) ≫
S₁.rightHomologyOpIso.hom := by
dsimp [rightHomologyOpIso, RightHomologyData.rightHomologyIso, rightHomologyMap,
| leftHomologyMap]
simp only [← rightHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id, id_comp, leftHomologyMap'_op]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/RightHomology.lean | 1,046 | 1,047 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Infinite sum and product over a topological monoid
This file defines unconditionally convergent sums over a commutative topological additive monoid.
For Euclidean spaces (finite dimensional Banach spaces) this is equivalent to absolute
convergence.
We also define unconditionally convergent products over a commutative topological multiplicative
monoid.
Note: There are summable sequences which are not unconditionally convergent! The other way holds
generally, see `HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat`.
## Implementation notes
We say that a function `f : β → α` has an unconditional product of `a` if the function
`fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b` converges to `a` on the `atTop` filter on `Finset β`. In other
words, for every neighborhood `U` of `a`, there exists a finite set `s : Finset β` of indices such
that `∏ b ∈ s', f b ∈ U` for any finite set `s'` which is a superset of `s`.
This may yield some unexpected results. For example, according to this definition, the product
`∏' n : ℕ, (1 : ℝ) / 2` unconditionally exists and is equal to `0`. More strikingly,
the product `∏' n : ℕ, (n : ℝ)` unconditionally exists and is equal to `0`, because one
of its terms is `0` (even though the product of the remaining terms diverges). Users who would
prefer that these products be considered not to exist can carry them out in the unit group `ℝˣ`
rather than in `ℝ`.
## References
* Bourbaki: General Topology (1995), Chapter 3 §5 (Infinite sums in commutative groups)
-/
/- **NOTE**. This file is intended to be kept short, just enough to state the basic definitions and
six key lemmas relating them together, namely `Summable.hasSum`, `Multipliable.hasProd`,
`HasSum.tsum_eq`, `HasProd.tprod_eq`, `Summable.hasSum_iff`, and `Multipliable.hasProd_iff`.
Do not add further lemmas here -- add them to `InfiniteSum.Basic` or (preferably) another, more
specific file. -/
noncomputable section
open Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
/-- `HasProd f a` means that the (potentially infinite) product of the `f b` for `b : β` converges
to `a`.
The `atTop` filter on `Finset β` is the limit of all finite sets towards the entire type. So we take
the product over bigger and bigger sets. This product operation is invariant under reordering.
For the definition and many statements, `α` does not need to be a topological monoid. We only add
this assumption later, for the lemmas where it is relevant.
These are defined in an identical way to infinite sums (`HasSum`). For example, we say that
the function `ℕ → ℝ` sending `n` to `1 / 2` has a product of `0`, rather than saying that it does
not converge as some authors would. -/
@[to_additive "`HasSum f a` means that the (potentially infinite) sum of the `f b` for `b : β`
converges to `a`.
The `atTop` filter on `Finset β` is the limit of all finite sets towards the entire type. So we sum
up bigger and bigger sets. This sum operation is invariant under reordering. In particular,
the function `ℕ → ℝ` sending `n` to `(-1)^n / (n+1)` does not have a
sum for this definition, but a series which is absolutely convergent will have the correct sum.
This is based on Mario Carneiro's
[infinite sum `df-tsms` in Metamath](http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/df-tsms.html).
For the definition and many statements, `α` does not need to be a topological monoid. We only add
this assumption later, for the lemmas where it is relevant."]
def HasProd (f : β → α) (a : α) : Prop :=
Tendsto (fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) atTop (𝓝 a)
/-- `Multipliable f` means that `f` has some (infinite) product. Use `tprod` to get the value. -/
@[to_additive "`Summable f` means that `f` has some (infinite) sum. Use `tsum` to get the value."]
def Multipliable (f : β → α) : Prop :=
∃ a, HasProd f a
open scoped Classical in
/-- `∏' i, f i` is the product of `f` if it exists and is unconditionally convergent,
or 1 otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`∑' i, f i` is the sum of `f` if it exists and is unconditionally convergent,
or 0 otherwise."]
noncomputable irreducible_def tprod {β} (f : β → α) :=
if h : Multipliable f then
/- Note that the product might not be uniquely defined if the topology is not separated.
When the multiplicative support of `f` is finite, we make the most reasonable choice to use the
product over the multiplicative support. Otherwise, we choose arbitrarily an `a` satisfying
`HasProd f a`. -/
if (mulSupport f).Finite then finprod f
else h.choose
else 1
-- see Note [operator precedence of big operators]
@[inherit_doc tprod]
notation3 "∏' "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => tprod f) => r
@[inherit_doc tsum]
notation3 "∑' "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => tsum f) => r
variable {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Finset β}
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.multipliable (h : HasProd f a) : Multipliable f :=
⟨a, h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable (h : ¬Multipliable f) : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
simp [tprod_def, h]
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x, x ∉ Set.range g → f x = 1) : HasProd (f ∘ g) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp only [HasProd, Tendsto, comp_apply, hg.map_atTop_finset_prod_eq hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset {s : Set β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
Subtype.coe_injective.hasProd_iff <| by simpa using mulSupport_subset_iff'.1 hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_fintype [Fintype β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (∏ b, f b) :=
OrderTop.tendsto_atTop_nhds _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) (∏ b ∈ s, f b) := by
rw [← prod_attach]
exact hasProd_fintype _
/-- If a function `f` is `1` outside of a finite set `s`, then it `HasProd` `∏ b ∈ s, f b`. -/
@[to_additive "If a function `f` vanishes outside of a finite set `s`, then it `HasSum`
`∑ b ∈ s, f b`."]
theorem hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
HasProd f (∏ b ∈ s, f b) :=
(hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hf).1 <| s.hasProd f
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) : Multipliable f :=
(hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one hf).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.hasProd (ha : Multipliable f) : HasProd f (∏' b, f b) := by
simp only [tprod_def, ha, dite_true]
by_cases H : (mulSupport f).Finite
· simp [H, hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one, finprod_eq_prod]
· simpa [H] using ha.choose_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.unique {a₁ a₂ : α} [T2Space α] : HasProd f a₁ → HasProd f a₂ → a₁ = a₂ := by
| classical exact tendsto_nhds_unique
variable [T2Space α]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Defs.lean | 166 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sym
/-! # Unordered tuples of elements of a multiset
Defines `Multiset.sym` and the specialized `Multiset.sym2` for computing multisets of all
unordered n-tuples from a given multiset. These are multiset versions of `Nat.multichoose`.
## Main declarations
* `Multiset.sym2`: `xs.sym2` is the multiset of all unordered pairs of elements from `xs`,
with multiplicity. The multiset's values are in `Sym2 α`.
## TODO
* Once `List.Perm.sym` is defined, define
```lean
protected def sym (n : Nat) (m : Multiset α) : Multiset (Sym α n) :=
m.liftOn (fun xs => xs.sym n) (List.perm.sym n)
```
and then use this to remove the `DecidableEq` assumption from `Finset.sym`.
* `theorem injective_sym2 : Function.Injective (Multiset.sym2 : Multiset α → _)`
* `theorem strictMono_sym2 : StrictMono (Multiset.sym2 : Multiset α → _)`
-/
namespace Multiset
variable {α β : Type*}
section Sym2
/-- `m.sym2` is the multiset of all unordered pairs of elements from `m`, with multiplicity.
If `m` has no duplicates then neither does `m.sym2`. -/
protected def sym2 (m : Multiset α) : Multiset (Sym2 α) :=
m.liftOn (fun xs => xs.sym2) fun _ _ h => by rw [coe_eq_coe]; exact h.sym2
@[simp] theorem sym2_coe (xs : List α) : (xs : Multiset α).sym2 = xs.sym2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sym2_eq_zero_iff {m : Multiset α} : m.sym2 = 0 ↔ m = 0 :=
m.inductionOn fun xs => by simp
@[simp]
theorem sym2_zero : (0 : Multiset α).sym2 = 0 := rfl
theorem sym2_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(m.cons a).sym2 = ((m.cons a).map <| fun b => s(a, b)) + m.sym2 :=
m.inductionOn fun _ => rfl
theorem sym2_map (f : α → β) (m : Multiset α) :
(m.map f).sym2 = m.sym2.map (Sym2.map f) :=
m.inductionOn fun xs => by simp [List.sym2_map]
theorem mk_mem_sym2_iff {m : Multiset α} {a b : α} :
s(a, b) ∈ m.sym2 ↔ a ∈ m ∧ b ∈ m :=
| m.inductionOn fun xs => by simp [List.mk_mem_sym2_iff]
theorem mem_sym2_iff {m : Multiset α} {z : Sym2 α} :
z ∈ m.sym2 ↔ ∀ y ∈ z, y ∈ m :=
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Sym.lean | 63 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt :) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩
rw [← IsPullback.paste_vert_iff this _, Category.comp_id]
exact (congr_app e j).symm
theorem IsUniversalColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα H
apply (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)))
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} : IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso (inv α) hc)
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)),
IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso α⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G] [ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(hc : IsUniversalColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun F' c' α f h hα H ↦
⟨isColimitOfReflects _ (hc (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G) (fun j ↦ (H j).map G)).some⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[∀ (i j : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ F.obj j) (g : i ⟶ j), PreservesLimit (cospan f (F.map g)) G]
[∀ (i : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) G]
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G]
[PreservesColimitsOfShape J G]
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(H : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f h hα
refine (Iff.trans ?_ (H (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G))).trans (forall_congr' fun j => ?_)
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨isColimitOfPreserves G h.some⟩, fun h => ⟨isColimitOfReflects G h.some⟩⟩
· exact IsPullback.map_iff G (NatTrans.congr_app h.symm j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.mapCocone_iff (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[G.IsEquivalence] : IsVanKampenColimit (G.mapCocone c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G, fun hc ↦ by
let e : F ⋙ G ⋙ Functor.inv G ≅ F := NatIso.hcomp (Iso.refl F) G.asEquivalence.unitIso.symm
apply IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone G.inv
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff e.inv).mp
exact hc.of_iso (Cocones.ext (G.asEquivalence.unitIso.app c.pt) (fun j => (by simp [e])))⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα H
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) ?_ using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· convert congr_arg (whiskerLeft e.inverse) e'
ext
simp
· intro k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsUniversalColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsUniversalColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) := by
intro F' c' α f e' hα
convert hc (c'.whisker e.inverse) (whiskerLeft e.inverse α ≫ (e.invFunIdAssoc F).hom) f ?_
((hα.whiskerLeft _).comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) using 1
· exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv e.symm).nonempty_congr
· simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Cocone.whisker_pt, Cocone.whisker_ι,
whiskerLeft_app, NatTrans.comp_app, Equivalence.invFunIdAssoc_hom_app, Functor.id_obj]
constructor
· intro H k
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
refine (H (e.inverse.obj k)).paste_vert ?_
have : IsIso (𝟙 (Cocone.whisker e.functor c).pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
· intro H j
have : α.app j
= F'.map (e.unit.app _) ≫ α.app _ ≫ F.map (e.counit.app (e.functor.obj j)) := by
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
rw [← Category.id_comp f, this]
refine IsPullback.paste_vert ?_ (H (e.functor.obj j))
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
· ext k
simpa using congr_app e' (e.inverse.obj k)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff {K : Type*} [Category K] (e : J ≌ K)
{F : K ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} :
IsVanKampenColimit (c.whisker e.functor) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ ((hc.whiskerEquivalence e.symm).precompose_isIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).inv).of_iso
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)), IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence e⟩
theorem isVanKampenColimit_of_evaluation [HasPullbacks D] [HasColimitsOfShape J D] (F : J ⥤ C ⥤ D)
(c : Cocone F) (hc : ∀ x : C, IsVanKampenColimit (((evaluation C D).obj x).mapCocone c)) :
IsVanKampenColimit c := by
intro F' c' α f e hα
have := fun x => hc x (((evaluation C D).obj x).mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α _)
(((evaluation C D).obj x).map f)
(by
ext y
dsimp
exact NatTrans.congr_app (NatTrans.congr_app e y) x)
(hα.whiskerRight _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨hc'⟩ j
refine ⟨⟨(NatTrans.congr_app e j).symm⟩, ⟨evaluationJointlyReflectsLimits _ ?_⟩⟩
| refine fun x => (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).symm ?_
exact ((this x).mp ⟨isColimitOfPreserves _ hc'⟩ _).isLimit
· exact fun H => ⟨evaluationJointlyReflectsColimits _ fun x =>
((this x).mpr fun j => (H j).map ((evaluation C D).obj x)).some⟩
end Functor
section reflective
theorem IsUniversalColimit.map_reflective
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
{F : J ⥤ D} {c : Cocone (F ⋙ Gr)}
(H : IsUniversalColimit c)
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)]
[∀ X (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app c.pt)) Gl] :
IsUniversalColimit (Gl.mapCocone c) := by
have := adj.rightAdjoint_preservesLimits
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize.{u', v'} Gl := adj.leftAdjoint_preservesColimits
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 284 | 301 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.