Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Indicator
import Mathlib.Topology.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Semicontinuous maps
A function `f` from a topological space `α` to an ordered space `β` is lower semicontinuous at a
point `x` if, for any `y < f x`, for any `x'` close enough to `x`, one has `f x' > y`. In other
words, `f` can jump up, but it can not jump down.
Upper semicontinuous functions are defined similarly.
This file introduces these notions, and a basic API around them mimicking the API for continuous
functions.
## Main definitions and results
We introduce 4 definitions related to lower semicontinuity:
* `LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousAt f x`
* `LowerSemicontinuousOn f s`
* `LowerSemicontinuous f`
We build a basic API using dot notation around these notions, and we prove that
* constant functions are lower semicontinuous;
* `indicator s (fun _ ↦ y)` is lower semicontinuous when `s` is open and `0 ≤ y`,
or when `s` is closed and `y ≤ 0`;
* continuous functions are lower semicontinuous;
* left composition with a continuous monotone functions maps lower semicontinuous functions to lower
semicontinuous functions. If the function is anti-monotone, it instead maps lower semicontinuous
functions to upper semicontinuous functions;
* right composition with continuous functions preserves lower and upper semicontinuity;
* a sum of two (or finitely many) lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* a supremum of a family of lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous;
* An infinite sum of `ℝ≥0∞`-valued lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous.
Similar results are stated and proved for upper semicontinuity.
We also prove that a function is continuous if and only if it is both lower and upper
semicontinuous.
We have some equivalent definitions of lower- and upper-semicontinuity (under certain
restrictions on the order on the codomain):
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage` in a linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf` in a dense complete linear order;
* `lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph` in a dense complete linear order with the order
topology.
## Implementation details
All the nontrivial results for upper semicontinuous functions are deduced from the corresponding
ones for lower semicontinuous functions using `OrderDual`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_convex_function>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-continuity>
-/
open Topology ENNReal
open Set Function Filter
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} {x : α}
{s t : Set α} {y z : β}
/-! ### Main definitions -/
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, y < f x'
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in
a general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y < f x, ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, y < f x'
/-- A real function `f` is lower semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at least `f x - ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y < f x` instead of `f x - ε`. -/
def LowerSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, LowerSemicontinuousAt f x
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` within a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all
`x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general
preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, f x' < y
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous on a set `s` if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x ∈ s`,
for all `x'` close enough to `x` in `s`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a
general preordered space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousOn (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous at `x` if, for any `ε > 0`, for all `x'` close
enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered space,
using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuousAt (f : α → β) (x : α) :=
∀ y, f x < y → ∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, f x' < y
/-- A real function `f` is upper semicontinuous if, for any `ε > 0`, for any `x`, for all `x'`
close enough to `x`, then `f x'` is at most `f x + ε`. We formulate this in a general preordered
space, using an arbitrary `y > f x` instead of `f x + ε`. -/
def UpperSemicontinuous (f : α → β) :=
∀ x, UpperSemicontinuousAt f x
/-!
### Lower semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for lower semicontinuity -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt, LowerSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : LowerSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ LowerSemicontinuous f := by
simp [LowerSemicontinuousOn, LowerSemicontinuous, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.lowerSemicontinuousOn (h : LowerSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
/-! #### Constants -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_const : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_const : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_const : LowerSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_const
/-! #### Indicators -/
section
variable [Zero β]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· filter_upwards [hs.mem_nhds h]
simp +contextual [hz]
· refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz.trans_le hy, hz]
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) := by
intro x z hz
by_cases h : x ∈ s <;> simp [h] at hz
· refine Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun x' => ?_
by_cases h' : x' ∈ s <;> simp [h', hz, hz.trans_le hy]
· filter_upwards [hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds h]
simp +contextual [hz]
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator hy).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
end
/-! #### Relationship with continuity -/
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
⟨fun H y => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx => H x y hx, fun H _x y y_lt =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds (H y) y_lt⟩
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : β) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Ioi y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage.1 hf y
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) := by
rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage]
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl, compl_Iic]
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (y : γ) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Iic y) :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage.1 hf y
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x := fun _y hy => h (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousOn.lowerSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem Continuous.lowerSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} (h : Continuous f) : LowerSemicontinuous f :=
fun _x => h.continuousAt.lowerSemicontinuousAt
end
/-! #### Equivalent definitions -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
constructor
· intro hf; unfold LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt at hf
contrapose! hf
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between hf; use y
exact ⟨ylt, fun h => lty.not_le
(le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (h.mono fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx))⟩
exact fun hf y ylt => eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (ylt.trans_le hf)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousAt f x ↔ f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff, lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf,
← nhdsWithin_univ]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousAt.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuous]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝[s] x) := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf, LowerSemicontinuousOn]
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuousOn.le_liminf, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph {f : α → γ} :
LowerSemicontinuous f ↔ IsClosed {p : α × γ | f p.1 ≤ p.2} := by
constructor
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf, isClosed_iff_forall_filter]
rintro hf ⟨x, y⟩ F F_ne h h'
rw [nhds_prod_eq, le_prod] at h'
calc f x ≤ liminf f (𝓝 x) := hf x
_ ≤ liminf f (map Prod.fst F) := liminf_le_liminf_of_le h'.1
_ = liminf (f ∘ Prod.fst) F := (Filter.liminf_comp _ _ _).symm
_ ≤ liminf Prod.snd F := liminf_le_liminf <| by
simpa using (eventually_principal.2 fun (_ : α × γ) ↦ id).filter_mono h
_ = y := h'.2.liminf_eq
· rw [lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage]
exact fun hf y ↦ hf.preimage (.prodMk_left y)
alias ⟨LowerSemicontinuous.isClosed_epigraph, _⟩ := lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph
end
/-! ### Composition -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderTopology δ]
variable {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Monotone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
intro y hy
by_cases h : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z, zlt, hz⟩ : ∃ z < f x, Ioc z (f x) ⊆ g ⁻¹' Ioi y :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (hg (Ioi_mem_nhds hy)) h
filter_upwards [hf z zlt] with a ha
calc
y < g (min (f x) (f a)) := hz (by simp [zlt, ha, le_refl])
_ ≤ g (f a) := gmon (min_le_right _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at h
exact Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun a => hy.trans_le (gmon (h (f a)))
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x := by
simp only [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at hf ⊢
exact hg.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Monotone g) : LowerSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt (hf x) gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt α _ x γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuousOn_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_lowerSemicontinuous_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Antitone g) : UpperSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt_antitone (hf x) gmon
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x :=
fun _ lt ↦ hg.eventually (hf _ lt)
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt_of_eq {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {y : α} {x : ι}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hy : g x = y) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x := by
rw [← hy] at hf
exact comp_continuousAt hf hg
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.comp_continuous {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(hf : LowerSemicontinuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x ↦ f (g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf (g x)).comp_continuousAt hg.continuousAt
end
/-! #### Addition -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {γ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid γ] [LinearOrder γ] [IsOrderedAddMonoid γ]
[TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x := by
intro y hy
obtain ⟨u, v, u_open, xu, v_open, xv, h⟩ :
∃ u v : Set γ,
IsOpen u ∧ f x ∈ u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ g x ∈ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ { p : γ × γ | y < p.fst + p.snd } :=
mem_nhds_prod_iff'.1 (hcont (isOpen_Ioi.mem_nhds hy))
by_cases hx₁ : ∃ l, l < f x
· obtain ⟨z₁, z₁lt, h₁⟩ : ∃ z₁ < f x, Ioc z₁ (f x) ⊆ u :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (u_open.mem_nhds xu) hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt, hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₁z h₂z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simpa [H] using h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simpa [H] using h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have : (min (f z) (f x), min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, A2⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₂
filter_upwards [hf z₁ z₁lt] with z h₁z
have A1 : min (f z) (f x) ∈ u := by
by_cases H : f z ≤ f x
· simpa [H] using h₁ ⟨h₁z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H]
have : (min (f z) (f x), g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨A1, xv⟩
calc
y < min (f z) (f x) + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (min_le_left _ _) (hx₂ (g z))
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁
by_cases hx₂ : ∃ l, l < g x
· obtain ⟨z₂, z₂lt, h₂⟩ : ∃ z₂ < g x, Ioc z₂ (g x) ⊆ v :=
exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv) hx₂
filter_upwards [hg z₂ z₂lt] with z h₂z
have A2 : min (g z) (g x) ∈ v := by
by_cases H : g z ≤ g x
· simpa [H] using h₂ ⟨h₂z, H⟩
· simpa [le_of_not_le H] using h₂ ⟨z₂lt, le_rfl⟩
have : (f x, min (g z) (g x)) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, A2⟩
calc
y < f x + min (g z) (g x) := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (min_le_left _ _)
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at hx₁ hx₂
apply Filter.Eventually.of_forall
intro z
have : (f x, g x) ∈ u ×ˢ v := ⟨xu, xv⟩
calc
y < f x + g x := h this
_ ≤ f z + g z := add_le_add (hx₁ (f z)) (hx₂ (g z))
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact hf.add' hg hcont
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s)
(hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).add' (hg x hx) (hcont x hx)
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g)
(hcont : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z := fun x => (hf x).add' (hg x) (hcont x)
variable [ContinuousAdd γ]
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousAt g x) : LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuousOn.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuousOn g s) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s :=
hf.add' hg fun _x _hx => continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two lower semicontinuous functions is lower semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem LowerSemicontinuous.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : LowerSemicontinuous f)
(hg : LowerSemicontinuous g) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z :=
hf.add' hg fun _x => continuous_add.continuousAt
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s x := by
classical
induction a using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
| insert _ _ ia IH =>
simp only [ia, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add (ha _ (Finset.mem_insert_self ..))
(IH fun j ja => ha j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ja))
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum ha
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) : LowerSemicontinuous fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z :=
fun x => lowerSemicontinuousAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x
end
/-! #### Supremum -/
section
variable {ι : Sort*} {δ δ' : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder δ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder δ']
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i y))
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s x := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simpa only [iSup_of_empty'] using lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
· intro y hy
rcases exists_lt_of_lt_ciSup hy with ⟨i, hi⟩
filter_upwards [h i y hi, bdd] with y hy hy' using hy.trans_le (le_ciSup hy' i)
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup {f : ι → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i hi) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i y)) (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at bdd
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup bdd h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i hi) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ x ∈ s, BddAbove (range fun i => f i x)) (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup (eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x') s :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i hi) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup fun hi => h i hi
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_ciSup {f : ι → α → δ'} (bdd : ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i => f i x))
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) : LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x' := fun x =>
lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup (Eventually.of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_iSup {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ i, f i x' :=
lowerSemicontinuous_ciSup (by simp) h
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_biSup {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, LowerSemicontinuous (f i hi)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨆ (i) (hi), f i hi x' :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iSup fun i => lowerSemicontinuous_iSup fun hi => h i hi
end
/-! #### Infinite sums -/
section
variable {ι : Type*}
theorem lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') s x := by
simp_rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
refine lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup fun b => ?_
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i _hi => h i
theorem lowerSemicontinuousAt_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') x := by
simp_rw [← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum h
theorem lowerSemicontinuousOn_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
LowerSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ∑' i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_tsum fun i => h i x hx
theorem lowerSemicontinuous_tsum {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, LowerSemicontinuous (f i)) :
LowerSemicontinuous fun x' => ∑' i, f i x' := fun x => lowerSemicontinuousAt_tsum fun i => h i x
end
/-!
### Upper semicontinuous functions
-/
/-! #### Basic dot notation interface for upper semicontinuity -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.mono (h : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f t x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ hst) (h y hy)
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f univ x ↔ UpperSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp [UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt, UpperSemicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (s : Set α)
(h : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds (h y hy)
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h x hx
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.mono (h : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff : UpperSemicontinuousOn f univ ↔ UpperSemicontinuous f := by
simp [UpperSemicontinuousOn, UpperSemicontinuous, upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff]
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousAt (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (x : α) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x :=
h x
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α)
(x : α) : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x :=
(h x).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt s
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.upperSemicontinuousOn (h : UpperSemicontinuous f) (s : Set α) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x _hx => h.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt s x
/-! #### Constants -/
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_const : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun _x => z) s x :=
fun _y hy => Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_const : UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun _x => z) x := fun _y hy =>
Filter.Eventually.of_forall fun _x => hy
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_const : UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun _x => z) s := fun _x _hx =>
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_const
theorem upperSemicontinuous_const : UpperSemicontinuous fun _x : α => z := fun _x =>
upperSemicontinuousAt_const
/-! #### Indicators -/
section
variable [Zero β]
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) :=
@IsOpen.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator α _ βᵒᵈ _ s y _ hs hy
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsOpen.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsOpen s) (hy : y ≤ 0) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuous_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuous (indicator s fun _x => y) :=
@IsClosed.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator α _ βᵒᵈ _ s y _ hs hy
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuousOn_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (indicator s fun _x => y) t :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousOn t
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuousAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (indicator s fun _x => y) x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousAt x
theorem IsClosed.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_indicator (hs : IsClosed s) (hy : 0 ≤ y) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (indicator s fun _x => y) t x :=
(hs.upperSemicontinuous_indicator hy).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt t x
end
/-! #### Relationship with continuity -/
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Iio y) :=
⟨fun H y => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx => H x y hx, fun H _x y y_lt =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds (H y) y_lt⟩
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.isOpen_preimage (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (y : β) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' Iio y) :=
upperSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage.1 hf y
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ]
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ y, IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Ici y) := by
rw [upperSemicontinuous_iff_isOpen_preimage]
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl, compl_Ici]
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.isClosed_preimage {f : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (y : γ) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' Ici y) :=
upperSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_preimage.1 hf y
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := fun _y hy => h (Iio_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousAt.upperSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x := fun _y hy => h (Iio_mem_nhds hy)
theorem ContinuousOn.upperSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (h x hx).upperSemicontinuousWithinAt
theorem Continuous.upperSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} (h : Continuous f) : UpperSemicontinuous f :=
fun _x => h.continuousAt.upperSemicontinuousAt
end
/-! #### Equivalent definitions -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ limsup f (𝓝[s] x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iff_limsup_le
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuousAt f x ↔ limsup f (𝓝 x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuousAt_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuousAt.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuousAt_iff_limsup_le
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ ∀ x, limsup f (𝓝 x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuous.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuous_iff_limsup_le
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_iff_limsup_le {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, limsup f (𝓝[s] x) ≤ f x :=
lowerSemicontinuousOn_iff_le_liminf (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuousOn.limsup_le, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuousOn_iff_limsup_le
variable [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iff_IsClosed_hypograph {f : α → γ} :
UpperSemicontinuous f ↔ IsClosed {p : α × γ | p.2 ≤ f p.1} :=
lowerSemicontinuous_iff_isClosed_epigraph (γ := γᵒᵈ)
alias ⟨UpperSemicontinuous.IsClosed_hypograph, _⟩ := upperSemicontinuous_iff_IsClosed_hypograph
end
/-! ### Composition -/
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderTopology δ]
variable {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Monotone g) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γᵒᵈ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon.dual
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Monotone g) : UpperSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_lowerSemicontinuousAt α _ x γᵒᵈ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon.dual
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuousOn {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Monotone g) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuous {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Monotone g) : UpperSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt (hf x) gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt α _ x s γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x) (gmon : Antitone g) :
LowerSemicontinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
@ContinuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt α _ x γ _ _ _ δᵒᵈ _ _ _ g f hg hf gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuousOn_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s) (gmon : Antitone g) : LowerSemicontinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun x hx => hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_antitone (hf x hx) gmon
theorem Continuous.comp_upperSemicontinuous_antitone {g : γ → δ} {f : α → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (gmon : Antitone g) : LowerSemicontinuous (g ∘ f) := fun x =>
hg.continuousAt.comp_upperSemicontinuousAt_antitone (hf x) gmon
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {x : ι}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f (g x)) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x :=
fun _ lt ↦ hg.eventually (hf _ lt)
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.comp_continuousAt_of_eq {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {y : α} {x : ι}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f y) (hg : ContinuousAt g x) (hy : g x = y) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x ↦ f (g x)) x := by
rw [← hy] at hf
exact comp_continuousAt hf hg
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.comp_continuous {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(hf : UpperSemicontinuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : UpperSemicontinuous fun x ↦ f (g x) :=
fun x ↦ (hf (g x)).comp_continuousAt hg.continuousAt
end
/-! #### Addition -/
section
variable {ι : Type*} {γ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid γ] [LinearOrder γ] [IsOrderedAddMonoid γ]
[TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt.add' (γ := γᵒᵈ) hf hg hcont
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousAt g x)
(hcont : ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x := by
simp_rw [← upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact hf.add' hg hcont
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousOn g s)
(hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).add' (hg x hx) (hcont x hx)
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with an
explicit continuity assumption on addition, for application to `EReal`. The unprimed version of
the lemma uses `[ContinuousAdd]`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.add' {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuous g)
(hcont : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (fun p : γ × γ => p.1 + p.2) (f x, g x)) :
UpperSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z := fun x => (hf x).add' (hg x) (hcont x)
variable [ContinuousAdd γ]
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt g s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => f z + g z) s x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousAt.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousAt f x)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousAt g x) : UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun z => f z + g z) x :=
hf.add' hg continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuousOn.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuousOn f s)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuousOn g s) : UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun z => f z + g z) s :=
hf.add' hg fun _x _hx => continuous_add.continuousAt
/-- The sum of two upper semicontinuous functions is upper semicontinuous. Formulated with
`[ContinuousAdd]`. The primed version of the lemma uses an explicit continuity assumption on
addition, for application to `EReal`. -/
theorem UpperSemicontinuous.add {f g : α → γ} (hf : UpperSemicontinuous f)
(hg : UpperSemicontinuous g) : UpperSemicontinuous fun z => f z + g z :=
hf.add' hg fun _x => continuous_add.continuousAt
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s x :=
lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum (γ := γᵒᵈ) ha
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) x := by
simp_rw [← upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff] at *
exact upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum ha
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z) s := fun x hx =>
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x hx
theorem upperSemicontinuous_sum {f : ι → α → γ} {a : Finset ι}
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, UpperSemicontinuous (f i)) : UpperSemicontinuous fun z => ∑ i ∈ a, f i z :=
fun x => upperSemicontinuousAt_sum fun i hi => ha i hi x
end
/-! #### Infimum -/
section
variable {ι : Sort*} {δ δ' : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder δ] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder δ']
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciInf {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, BddBelow (range fun i => f i y))
(h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') s x :=
@lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciSup α _ x s ι δ'ᵒᵈ _ f bdd h
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iInf {f : ι → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') s x :=
@lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_iSup α _ x s ι δᵒᵈ _ f h
theorem upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (f i hi) s x) :
UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt (fun x' => ⨅ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s x :=
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iInf fun i => upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iInf fun hi => h i hi
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_ciInf {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, BddBelow (range fun i => f i y)) (h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') x :=
@lowerSemicontinuousAt_ciSup α _ x ι δ'ᵒᵈ _ f bdd h
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_iInf {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousAt (f i) x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') x :=
@lowerSemicontinuousAt_iSup α _ x ι δᵒᵈ _ f h
theorem upperSemicontinuousAt_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, UpperSemicontinuousAt (f i hi) x) :
UpperSemicontinuousAt (fun x' => ⨅ (i) (hi), f i hi x') x :=
upperSemicontinuousAt_iInf fun i => upperSemicontinuousAt_iInf fun hi => h i hi
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_ciInf {f : ι → α → δ'}
(bdd : ∀ x ∈ s, BddBelow (range fun i => f i x)) (h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_ciInf (eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x hx
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_iInf {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuousOn (f i) s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x') s := fun x hx =>
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_iInf fun i => h i x hx
theorem upperSemicontinuousOn_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, UpperSemicontinuousOn (f i hi) s) :
UpperSemicontinuousOn (fun x' => ⨅ (i) (hi), f i hi x') s :=
upperSemicontinuousOn_iInf fun i => upperSemicontinuousOn_iInf fun hi => h i hi
theorem upperSemicontinuous_ciInf {f : ι → α → δ'} (bdd : ∀ x, BddBelow (range fun i => f i x))
(h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuous (f i)) : UpperSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x' := fun x =>
upperSemicontinuousAt_ciInf (Eventually.of_forall bdd) fun i => h i x
theorem upperSemicontinuous_iInf {f : ι → α → δ} (h : ∀ i, UpperSemicontinuous (f i)) :
UpperSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨅ i, f i x' := fun x => upperSemicontinuousAt_iInf fun i => h i x
theorem upperSemicontinuous_biInf {p : ι → Prop} {f : ∀ i, p i → α → δ}
(h : ∀ i hi, UpperSemicontinuous (f i hi)) :
UpperSemicontinuous fun x' => ⨅ (i) (hi), f i hi x' :=
upperSemicontinuous_iInf fun i => upperSemicontinuous_iInf fun hi => h i hi
end
section
variable {γ : Type*} [LinearOrder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderTopology γ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt {f : α → γ} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔
LowerSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ UpperSemicontinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt, h.upperSemicontinuousWithinAt⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
intro v hv
simp only [Filter.mem_map]
by_cases Hl : ∃ l, l < f x
· rcases exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds hv Hl with ⟨l, lfx, hl⟩
by_cases Hu : ∃ u, f x < u
· rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds hv Hu with ⟨u, fxu, hu⟩
filter_upwards [h₁ l lfx, h₂ u fxu] with a lfa fau
rcases le_or_gt (f a) (f x) with h | h
· exact hl ⟨lfa, h⟩
· exact hu ⟨le_of_lt h, fau⟩
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at Hu
filter_upwards [h₁ l lfx] with a lfa using hl ⟨lfa, Hu (f a)⟩
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at Hl
by_cases Hu : ∃ u, f x < u
· rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds hv Hu with ⟨u, fxu, hu⟩
filter_upwards [h₂ u fxu] with a lfa
apply hu
exact ⟨Hl (f a), lfa⟩
· simp only [not_exists, not_lt] at Hu
apply Filter.Eventually.of_forall
intro a
have : f a = f x := le_antisymm (Hu _) (Hl _)
rw [this]
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hv
theorem continuousAt_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuousAt {f : α → γ} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ LowerSemicontinuousAt f x ∧ UpperSemicontinuousAt f x := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ, ← lowerSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff, ←
upperSemicontinuousWithinAt_univ_iff, continuousWithinAt_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt]
theorem continuousOn_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuousOn {f : α → γ} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ LowerSemicontinuousOn f s ∧ UpperSemicontinuousOn f s := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuousWithinAt]
exact
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x hx => (H x hx).1, fun x hx => (H x hx).2⟩, fun H x hx => ⟨H.1 x hx, H.2 x hx⟩⟩
theorem continuous_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuous {f : α → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ LowerSemicontinuous f ∧ UpperSemicontinuous f := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ, continuousOn_iff_lower_upperSemicontinuousOn,
lowerSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff, upperSemicontinuousOn_univ_iff]
end
| Mathlib/Topology/Semicontinuous.lean | 1,254 | 1,258 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ComposableArrows
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions
/-! # Essential surjectivity of the functor induced on composable arrows
Assuming that `L : C ⥤ D` is a localization functor for a class of morphisms `W`
that has a calculus of left *or* right fractions, we show in this file
that the functor `L.mapComposableArrows n : ComposableArrows C n ⥤ ComposableArrows D n`
is essentially surjective for any `n : ℕ`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Localization
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (L : C ⥤ D) (W : MorphismProperty C)
[L.IsLocalization W]
open ComposableArrows
lemma essSurj_mapComposableArrows_of_hasRightCalculusOfFractions
[W.HasRightCalculusOfFractions] (n : ℕ) :
(L.mapComposableArrows n).EssSurj where
mem_essImage Y := by
have := essSurj L W
induction n with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨Y, rfl⟩ := mk₀_surjective Y
exact ⟨mk₀ _, ⟨isoMk₀ (L.objObjPreimageIso Y)⟩⟩
| succ n hn =>
obtain ⟨Y, Z, f, rfl⟩ := ComposableArrows.precomp_surjective Y
obtain ⟨Y', ⟨e⟩⟩ := hn Y
obtain ⟨f', hf'⟩ := exists_rightFraction L W
((L.objObjPreimageIso Z).hom ≫ f ≫ (e.app 0).inv)
refine ⟨Y'.precomp f'.f,
⟨isoMkSucc (isoOfHom L W _ f'.hs ≪≫ L.objObjPreimageIso Z) e ?_⟩⟩
dsimp at hf' ⊢
simp [← cancel_mono (e.inv.app 0), hf']
| lemma essSurj_mapComposableArrows [W.HasLeftCalculusOfFractions] (n : ℕ) :
(L.mapComposableArrows n).EssSurj := by
have := essSurj_mapComposableArrows_of_hasRightCalculusOfFractions L.op W.op n
have := Functor.essSurj_of_iso (L.mapComposableArrowsOpIso n).symm
exact Functor.essSurj_of_comp_fully_faithful _ (opEquivalence D n).functor.rightOp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/CalculusOfFractions/ComposableArrows.lean | 46 | 50 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Map
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.NAry
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Defs
/-!
# Pointwise operations on filters
This file defines pointwise operations on filters. This is useful because usual algebraic operations
distribute over pointwise operations. For example,
* `(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m`
* `𝓝 (x * y) = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y`
## Main declarations
* `0` (`Filter.instZero`): Pure filter at `0 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `0 : Set α`.
* `1` (`Filter.instOne`): Pure filter at `1 : α`, or alternatively principal filter at `1 : Set α`.
* `f + g` (`Filter.instAdd`): Addition, filter generated by all `s + t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f * g` (`Filter.instMul`): Multiplication, filter generated by all `s * t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `-f` (`Filter.instNeg`): Negation, filter of all `-s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f⁻¹` (`Filter.instInv`): Inversion, filter of all `s⁻¹` where `s ∈ f`.
* `f - g` (`Filter.instSub`): Subtraction, filter generated by all `s - t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f / g` (`Filter.instDiv`): Division, filter generated by all `s / t` where `s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `f +ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVAdd`): Scalar addition, filter generated by all `s +ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f` and
`t ∈ g`.
* `f -ᵥ g` (`Filter.instVSub`): Scalar subtraction, filter generated by all `s -ᵥ t` where `s ∈ f`
and `t ∈ g`.
* `f • g` (`Filter.instSMul`): Scalar multiplication, filter generated by all `s • t` where
`s ∈ f` and `t ∈ g`.
* `a +ᵥ f` (`Filter.instVAddFilter`): Translation, filter of all `a +ᵥ s` where `s ∈ f`.
* `a • f` (`Filter.instSMulFilter`): Scaling, filter of all `a • s` where `s ∈ f`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Filter α` is a semigroup/monoid.
As an unfortunate side effect, this means that `n • f`, where `n : ℕ`, is ambiguous between
pointwise scaling and repeated pointwise addition. See note [pointwise nat action].
## Implementation notes
We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`).
## Tags
filter multiplication, filter addition, pointwise addition, pointwise multiplication,
-/
open Function Set Filter Pointwise
variable {F α β γ δ ε : Type*}
namespace Filter
/-! ### `0`/`1` as filters -/
section One
variable [One α] {f : Filter α} {s : Set α}
/-- `1 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `1 : α` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"`0 : Filter α` is defined as the filter of sets containing `0 : α` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instOne : One (Filter α) :=
⟨pure 1⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instOne Filter.instZero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_one : s ∈ (1 : Filter α) ↔ (1 : α) ∈ s :=
mem_pure
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one : (1 : Set α) ∈ (1 : Filter α) :=
mem_pure.2 Set.one_mem_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_one : pure 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zero_prod]
theorem one_prod {l : Filter β} : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ l = map (1, ·) l := pure_prod
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_zero]
theorem prod_one {l : Filter β} : l ×ˢ (1 : Filter α) = map (·, 1) l := prod_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem principal_one : 𝓟 1 = (1 : Filter α) :=
principal_singleton _
@[to_additive]
theorem one_neBot : (1 : Filter α).NeBot :=
Filter.pure_neBot
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] one_neBot zero_neBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_one' (f : α → β) : (1 : Filter α).map f = pure (f 1) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_one_iff : f ≤ 1 ↔ (1 : Set α) ∈ f :=
le_pure_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.le_one_iff (h : f.NeBot) : f ≤ 1 ↔ f = 1 :=
h.le_pure_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem eventually_one {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 1, p x) ↔ p 1 :=
eventually_pure
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tendsto_one {a : Filter β} {f : β → α} : Tendsto f a 1 ↔ ∀ᶠ x in a, f x = 1 :=
tendsto_pure
@[to_additive zero_prod_zero]
theorem one_prod_one [One β] : (1 : Filter α) ×ˢ (1 : Filter β) = 1 :=
prod_pure_pure
/-- `pure` as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as a `ZeroHom`."]
def pureOneHom : OneHom α (Filter α) where
toFun := pure; map_one' := pure_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureOneHom : (pureOneHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureOneHom_apply (a : α) : pureOneHom a = pure a :=
rfl
variable [One β]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_one [FunLike F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : map φ 1 = 1 := by
simp
end One
/-! ### Filter negation/inversion -/
section Inv
variable [Inv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α}
/-- The inverse of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `⁻¹` of its sets. -/
@[to_additive "The negation of a filter is the pointwise preimage under `-` of its sets."]
instance instInv : Inv (Filter α) :=
⟨map Inv.inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_inv : f.map Inv.inv = f⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_inv : s ∈ f⁻¹ ↔ Inv.inv ⁻¹' s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_le_inv (hf : f ≤ g) : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ :=
map_mono hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_pure : (pure a : Filter α)⁻¹ = pure a⁻¹ :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_bot_iff : f⁻¹ = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
map_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem neBot_inv_iff : f⁻¹.NeBot ↔ NeBot f :=
map_neBot_iff _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.inv : f.NeBot → f⁻¹.NeBot := fun h => h.map _
@[to_additive neg.instNeBot]
lemma inv.instNeBot [NeBot f] : NeBot f⁻¹ := .inv ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] inv.instNeBot neg.instNeBot
end Inv
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected lemma comap_inv : comap Inv.inv f = f⁻¹ :=
.symm <| map_eq_comap_of_inverse (inv_comp_inv _) (inv_comp_inv _)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv (hs : s ∈ f) : s⁻¹ ∈ f⁻¹ := by rwa [mem_inv, inv_preimage, inv_inv]
/-- Inversion is involutive on `Filter α` if it is on `α`. -/
@[to_additive "Negation is involutive on `Filter α` if it is on `α`."]
protected def instInvolutiveInv : InvolutiveInv (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instInv with
inv_inv := fun f => map_map.trans <| by rw [inv_involutive.comp_self, map_id] }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instInvolutiveInv Filter.instInvolutiveNeg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem inv_le_inv_iff : f⁻¹ ≤ g⁻¹ ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv f ▸ inv_inv g ▸ Filter.inv_le_inv h, Filter.inv_le_inv⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_inv : f⁻¹ ≤ g ↔ f ≤ g⁻¹ := by rw [← Filter.inv_le_inv_iff, inv_inv]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self : f⁻¹ ≤ f ↔ f⁻¹ = f :=
⟨fun h => h.antisymm <| inv_le_iff_le_inv.1 h, Eq.le⟩
end InvolutiveInv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_atTop {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [PartialOrder G] [IsOrderedMonoid G] :
(atTop : Filter G)⁻¹ = atBot :=
(OrderIso.inv G).map_atTop
/-! ### Filter addition/multiplication -/
section Mul
variable [Mul α] [Mul β] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ h : Filter α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The filter `f * g` is generated by `{s * t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f + g` is generated by `{s + t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instMul : Mul (Filter α) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· * ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s` rather
than all the way to `Set.image2 (· * ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· * ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instMul Filter.instAdd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_mul : map₂ (· * ·) f g = f * g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_mul : s ∈ f * g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ * t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s * t ∈ f * g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_bot : f * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_bot_iff : f * g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] -- TODO: make this a scoped instance in the `Pointwise` namespace
lemma mul_neBot_iff : (f * g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.mul : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f * g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_mul_left : (f * g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_mul_right : (f * g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive add.instNeBot]
protected lemma mul.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f * g) := .mul ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] mul.instNeBot add.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_mul : pure a * g = g.map (a * ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_pure : f * pure b = f.map (· * b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_mul_pure : (pure a : Filter α) * pure b = pure (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_mul_iff : h ≤ f * g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s * t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono (Filter α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_right⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_mul [FunLike F α β] [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) :
(f₁ * f₂).map m = f₁.map m * f₂.map m :=
map_map₂_distrib <| map_mul m
/-- `pure` operation as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The singleton operation as an `AddHom`."]
def pureMulHom : α →ₙ* Filter α where
toFun := pure; map_mul' _ _ := pure_mul_pure.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureMulHom : (pureMulHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureMulHom_apply (a : α) : pureMulHom a = pure a :=
rfl
end Mul
/-! ### Filter subtraction/division -/
section Div
variable [Div α] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ h : Filter α} {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- The filter `f / g` is generated by `{s / t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f - g` is generated by `{s - t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instDiv : Div (Filter α) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· / ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s`
rather than all the way to `Set.image2 (· / ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· / ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instDiv Filter.instSub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_div : map₂ (· / ·) f g = f / g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_div : s ∈ f / g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ / t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s / t ∈ f / g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_div : ⊥ / g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_bot : f / ⊥ = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_bot_iff : f / g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_neBot_iff : (f / g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.div : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f / g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_div_left : (f / g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_div_right : (f / g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive sub.instNeBot]
lemma div.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f / g) := .div ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] div.instNeBot sub.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_div : pure a / g = g.map (a / ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_pure : f / pure b = f.map (· / b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_div_pure : (pure a : Filter α) / pure b = pure (a / b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div : f₁ ≤ f₂ → g₁ ≤ g₂ → f₁ / g₁ ≤ f₂ / g₂ :=
map₂_mono
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div_left : g₁ ≤ g₂ → f / g₁ ≤ f / g₂ :=
map₂_mono_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_le_div_right : f₁ ≤ f₂ → f₁ / g ≤ f₂ / g :=
map₂_mono_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem le_div_iff : h ≤ f / g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s / t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_div : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter α) (· / ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_swap_div : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter α) (swap (· / ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_right⟩
end Div
open Pointwise
/-- Repeated pointwise addition (not the same as pointwise repeated addition!) of a `Filter`. See
Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def instNSMul [Zero α] [Add α] : SMul ℕ (Filter α) :=
⟨nsmulRec⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication (not the same as pointwise repeated multiplication!) of a
`Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def instNPow [One α] [Mul α] : Pow (Filter α) ℕ :=
⟨fun s n => npowRec n s⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise addition/subtraction (not the same as pointwise repeated
addition/subtraction!) of a `Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
protected def instZSMul [Zero α] [Add α] [Neg α] : SMul ℤ (Filter α) :=
⟨zsmulRec⟩
/-- Repeated pointwise multiplication/division (not the same as pointwise repeated
multiplication/division!) of a `Filter`. See Note [pointwise nat action]. -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected def instZPow [One α] [Mul α] [Inv α] : Pow (Filter α) ℤ :=
⟨fun s n => zpowRec npowRec n s⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instNSMul Filter.instNPow
Filter.instZSMul Filter.instZPow
/-- `Filter α` is a `Semigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def semigroup [Semigroup α] : Semigroup (Filter α) where
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := map₂_assoc mul_assoc
/-- `Filter α` is a `CommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddCommSemigroup` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def commSemigroup [CommSemigroup α] : CommSemigroup (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.semigroup with mul_comm := fun _ _ => map₂_comm mul_comm }
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β]
/-- `Filter α` is a `MulOneClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddZeroClass` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def mulOneClass : MulOneClass (Filter α) where
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
one_mul := map₂_left_identity one_mul
mul_one := map₂_right_identity mul_one
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.semigroup Filter.addSemigroup
Filter.commSemigroup Filter.addCommSemigroup Filter.mulOneClass Filter.addZeroClass
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- If `φ : α →* β` then `mapMonoidHom φ` is the monoid homomorphism
`Filter α →* Filter β` induced by `map φ`. -/
@[to_additive "If `φ : α →+ β` then `mapAddMonoidHom φ` is the monoid homomorphism
`Filter α →+ Filter β` induced by `map φ`."]
def mapMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F α β] (φ : F) : Filter α →* Filter β where
toFun := map φ
map_one' := Filter.map_one φ
map_mul' _ _ := Filter.map_mul φ
-- The other direction does not hold in general
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_mul_comap_le [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) {f g : Filter β} :
f.comap m * g.comap m ≤ (f * g).comap m := fun _ ⟨_, ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, t₁t₂⟩, mt⟩ =>
⟨m ⁻¹' t₁, ⟨t₁, ht₁, Subset.rfl⟩, m ⁻¹' t₂, ⟨t₂, ht₂, Subset.rfl⟩,
(preimage_mul_preimage_subset _).trans <| (preimage_mono t₁t₂).trans mt⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Tendsto.mul_mul [MulHomClass F α β] (m : F) {f₁ g₁ : Filter α} {f₂ g₂ : Filter β} :
Tendsto m f₁ f₂ → Tendsto m g₁ g₂ → Tendsto m (f₁ * g₁) (f₂ * g₂) := fun hf hg =>
(Filter.map_mul m).trans_le <| mul_le_mul' hf hg
/-- `pure` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "`pure` as an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def pureMonoidHom : α →* Filter α :=
{ pureMulHom, pureOneHom with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_pureMonoidHom : (pureMonoidHom : α → Filter α) = pure :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pureMonoidHom_apply (a : α) : pureMonoidHom a = pure a :=
rfl
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
/-- `Filter α` is a `Monoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def monoid : Monoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.mulOneClass, Filter.semigroup, @Filter.instNPow α _ _ with }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.monoid Filter.addMonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_pow (hs : s ∈ f) : ∀ n : ℕ, s ^ n ∈ f ^ n
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact one_mem_one
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact mul_mem_mul (pow_mem_pow hs n) hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nsmul_bot]
theorem bot_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (⊥ : Filter α) ^ n = ⊥ := by
rw [← Nat.sub_one_add_one hn, pow_succ', bot_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_top_of_one_le (hf : 1 ≤ f) : f * ⊤ = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s => ?_
simp only [mem_mul, mem_top, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left]
rintro ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
rwa [mul_univ_of_one_mem (mem_one.1 <| hf ht), univ_subset_iff] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem top_mul_of_one_le (hf : 1 ≤ f) : ⊤ * f = ⊤ := by
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s => ?_
simp only [mem_mul, mem_top, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left]
rintro ⟨t, ht, hs⟩
rwa [univ_mul_of_one_mem (mem_one.1 <| hf ht), univ_subset_iff] at hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_mul_top : (⊤ : Filter α) * ⊤ = ⊤ :=
mul_top_of_one_le le_top
@[to_additive nsmul_top]
theorem top_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (⊤ : Filter α) ^ n = ⊤
| 0 => fun h => (h rfl).elim
| 1 => fun _ => pow_one _
| n + 2 => fun _ => by rw [pow_succ, top_pow n.succ_ne_zero, top_mul_top]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem _root_.IsUnit.filter : IsUnit a → IsUnit (pure a : Filter α) :=
IsUnit.map (pureMonoidHom : α →* Filter α)
end Monoid
/-- `Filter α` is a `CommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is an `AddCommMonoid` under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def commMonoid [CommMonoid α] : CommMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.mulOneClass, Filter.commSemigroup with }
open Pointwise
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {f g : Filter α}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_eq_one_iff : f * g = 1 ↔ ∃ a b, f = pure a ∧ g = pure b ∧ a * b = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, h⟩ : (1 : Set α) ∈ f * g := hfg.symm ▸ one_mem_one
have hfg : (f * g).NeBot := hfg.symm.subst one_neBot
rw [(hfg.nonempty_of_mem <| mul_mem_mul h₁ h₂).subset_one_iff, Set.mul_eq_one_iff] at h
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a, b, ?_, ?_, h⟩
· rwa [← hfg.of_mul_left.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
· rwa [← hfg.of_mul_right.le_pure_iff, le_pure_iff]
· rintro ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, h⟩
rw [pure_mul_pure, h, pure_one]
/-- `Filter α` is a division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive "`Filter α` is a subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if
`α` is."]
protected def divisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.monoid, Filter.instInvolutiveInv, Filter.instDiv, Filter.instZPow (α := α) with
mul_inv_rev := fun _ _ => map_map₂_antidistrib mul_inv_rev
inv_eq_of_mul := fun s t h => by
obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, hab⟩ := Filter.mul_eq_one_iff.1 h
rw [inv_pure, inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right hab]
div_eq_mul_inv := fun _ _ => map_map₂_distrib_right div_eq_mul_inv }
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit f ↔ ∃ a, f = pure a ∧ IsUnit a := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, h⟩ := Filter.mul_eq_one_iff.1 u.mul_inv
refine ⟨a, ha, ⟨a, b, h, pure_injective ?_⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← pure_mul_pure, ← ha, ← hb]
exact u.inv_mul
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, ha⟩
exact ha.filter
end DivisionMonoid
/-- `Filter α` is a commutative division monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is. -/
@[to_additive subtractionCommMonoid
"`Filter α` is a commutative subtraction monoid under pointwise operations if `α` is."]
protected def divisionCommMonoid [DivisionCommMonoid α] : DivisionCommMonoid (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.divisionMonoid, Filter.commSemigroup with }
/-- `Filter α` has distributive negation if `α` has. -/
protected def instDistribNeg [Mul α] [HasDistribNeg α] : HasDistribNeg (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instInvolutiveNeg with
neg_mul := fun _ _ => map₂_map_left_comm neg_mul
mul_neg := fun _ _ => map_map₂_right_comm mul_neg }
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.commMonoid Filter.addCommMonoid Filter.divisionMonoid
Filter.subtractionMonoid Filter.divisionCommMonoid Filter.subtractionCommMonoid
Filter.instDistribNeg
section Distrib
variable [Distrib α] {f g h : Filter α}
/-!
Note that `Filter α` is not a `Distrib` because `f * g + f * h` has cross terms that `f * (g + h)`
lacks.
-/
theorem mul_add_subset : f * (g + h) ≤ f * g + f * h :=
map₂_distrib_le_left mul_add
theorem add_mul_subset : (f + g) * h ≤ f * h + g * h :=
map₂_distrib_le_right add_mul
end Distrib
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] {f g : Filter α}
/-! Note that `Filter` is not a `MulZeroClass` because `0 * ⊥ ≠ 0`. -/
theorem NeBot.mul_zero_nonneg (hf : f.NeBot) : 0 ≤ f * 0 :=
le_mul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, ha⟩ := hf.nonempty_of_mem h₁
⟨_, ha, _, h₂, mul_zero _⟩
theorem NeBot.zero_mul_nonneg (hg : g.NeBot) : 0 ≤ 0 * g :=
le_mul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, hb⟩ := hg.nonempty_of_mem h₂
⟨_, h₁, _, hb, zero_mul _⟩
end MulZeroClass
section Group
variable [Group α] [DivisionMonoid β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(m : F) {f g f₁ g₁ : Filter α} {f₂ g₂ : Filter β}
/-! Note that `Filter α` is not a group because `f / f ≠ 1` in general -/
-- Porting note: increase priority to appease `simpNF` so left-hand side doesn't simplify
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1100)]
protected theorem one_le_div_iff : 1 ≤ f / g ↔ ¬Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h hfg => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ := hfg.le_bot (mem_bot : ∅ ∈ ⊥)
exact Set.one_mem_div_iff.1 (h <| div_mem_div hs ht) (disjoint_iff.2 hst.symm)
· rintro h s ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩
exact hs (Set.one_mem_div_iff.2 fun ht => h <| disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem ht h₁ h₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem not_one_le_div_iff : ¬1 ≤ f / g ↔ Disjoint f g :=
Filter.one_le_div_iff.not_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.one_le_div (h : f.NeBot) : 1 ≤ f / f := by
rintro s ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 (h.not_disjoint h₁ h₂)
rw [mem_one, ← div_self' a]
exact hs (Set.div_mem_div ha₁ ha₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_pure (a : α) : IsUnit (pure a : Filter α) :=
(Group.isUnit a).filter
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff_singleton : IsUnit f ↔ ∃ a, f = pure a := by
simp only [isUnit_iff, Group.isUnit, and_true]
@[to_additive]
theorem map_inv' : f⁻¹.map m = (f.map m)⁻¹ :=
Semiconj.filter_map (map_inv m) f
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Tendsto.inv_inv : Tendsto m f₁ f₂ → Tendsto m f₁⁻¹ f₂⁻¹ := fun hf =>
(Filter.map_inv' m).trans_le <| Filter.inv_le_inv hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_div : (f / g).map m = f.map m / g.map m :=
map_map₂_distrib <| map_div m
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Tendsto.div_div (hf : Tendsto m f₁ f₂) (hg : Tendsto m g₁ g₂) :
Tendsto m (f₁ / g₁) (f₂ / g₂) :=
(Filter.map_div m).trans_le <| Filter.div_le_div hf hg
end Group
open Pointwise
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] {f g : Filter α}
theorem NeBot.div_zero_nonneg (hf : f.NeBot) : 0 ≤ f / 0 :=
Filter.le_div_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, ha⟩ := hf.nonempty_of_mem h₁
⟨_, ha, _, h₂, div_zero _⟩
theorem NeBot.zero_div_nonneg (hg : g.NeBot) : 0 ≤ 0 / g :=
Filter.le_div_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, hb⟩ := hg.nonempty_of_mem h₂
⟨_, h₁, _, hb, zero_div _⟩
end GroupWithZero
/-! ### Scalar addition/multiplication of filters -/
section SMul
variable [SMul α β] {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g g₁ g₂ h : Filter β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {a : α}
{b : β}
/-- The filter `f • g` is generated by `{s • t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "The filter `f +ᵥ g` is generated by `{s +ᵥ t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale
`Pointwise`."]
protected def instSMul : SMul (Filter α) (Filter β) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (· • ·) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ • t₂ ⊆ s`
rather than all the way to `Set.image2 (· • ·) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· • ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ • t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instSMul Filter.instVAdd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map₂_smul : map₂ (· • ·) f g = f • g :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_smul : t ∈ f • g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ • t₂ ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_mem_smul : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s • t ∈ f • g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : Filter α) • g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_bot : f • (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_eq_bot_iff : f • g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_neBot_iff : (f • g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem NeBot.smul : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f • g) :=
NeBot.map₂
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_smul_left : (f • g).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_smul_right : (f • g).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
@[to_additive vadd.instNeBot]
lemma smul.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f • g) := .smul ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] smul.instNeBot vadd.instNeBot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pure_smul : (pure a : Filter α) • g = g.map (a • ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_pure : f • pure b = f.map (· • b) :=
map₂_pure_right
@[to_additive]
theorem pure_smul_pure : (pure a : Filter α) • (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a • b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_le_smul : f₁ ≤ f₂ → g₁ ≤ g₂ → f₁ • g₁ ≤ f₂ • g₂ :=
map₂_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_le_smul_left : g₁ ≤ g₂ → f • g₁ ≤ f • g₂ :=
map₂_mono_left
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_le_smul_right : f₁ ≤ f₂ → f₁ • g ≤ f₂ • g :=
map₂_mono_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_smul_iff : h ≤ f • g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s • t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_smul : CovariantClass (Filter α) (Filter β) (· • ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_mono_left⟩
end SMul
/-! ### Scalar subtraction of filters -/
section Vsub
variable [VSub α β] {f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {h : Filter α} {s t : Set β} {a b : β}
/-- The filter `f -ᵥ g` is generated by `{s -ᵥ t | s ∈ f, t ∈ g}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
protected def instVSub : VSub (Filter α) (Filter β) :=
⟨/- This is defeq to `map₂ (-ᵥ) f g`, but the hypothesis unfolds to `t₁ -ᵥ t₂ ⊆ s` rather than all
the way to `Set.image2 (-ᵥ) t₁ t₂ ⊆ s`. -/
fun f g => { map₂ (· -ᵥ ·) f g with sets := { s | ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ -ᵥ t₂ ⊆ s } }⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instVSub
@[simp]
theorem map₂_vsub : map₂ (· -ᵥ ·) f g = f -ᵥ g :=
rfl
theorem mem_vsub {s : Set α} : s ∈ f -ᵥ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ -ᵥ t₂ ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem vsub_mem_vsub : s ∈ f → t ∈ g → s -ᵥ t ∈ f -ᵥ g :=
image2_mem_map₂
@[simp]
theorem bot_vsub : (⊥ : Filter β) -ᵥ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_left
@[simp]
theorem vsub_bot : f -ᵥ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ :=
map₂_bot_right
@[simp]
theorem vsub_eq_bot_iff : f -ᵥ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ :=
map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem vsub_neBot_iff : (f -ᵥ g : Filter α).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff
protected theorem NeBot.vsub : NeBot f → NeBot g → NeBot (f -ᵥ g) :=
NeBot.map₂
theorem NeBot.of_vsub_left : (f -ᵥ g : Filter α).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_left
theorem NeBot.of_vsub_right : (f -ᵥ g : Filter α).NeBot → g.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map₂_right
lemma vsub.instNeBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (f -ᵥ g) := .vsub ‹_› ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] vsub.instNeBot
@[simp]
theorem pure_vsub : (pure a : Filter β) -ᵥ g = g.map (a -ᵥ ·) :=
map₂_pure_left
@[simp]
theorem vsub_pure : f -ᵥ pure b = f.map (· -ᵥ b) :=
map₂_pure_right
theorem pure_vsub_pure : (pure a : Filter β) -ᵥ pure b = (pure (a -ᵥ b) : Filter α) := by simp
theorem vsub_le_vsub : f₁ ≤ f₂ → g₁ ≤ g₂ → f₁ -ᵥ g₁ ≤ f₂ -ᵥ g₂ :=
map₂_mono
theorem vsub_le_vsub_left : g₁ ≤ g₂ → f -ᵥ g₁ ≤ f -ᵥ g₂ :=
map₂_mono_left
theorem vsub_le_vsub_right : f₁ ≤ f₂ → f₁ -ᵥ g ≤ f₂ -ᵥ g :=
map₂_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem le_vsub_iff : h ≤ f -ᵥ g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → s -ᵥ t ∈ h :=
le_map₂_iff
end Vsub
/-! ### Translation/scaling of filters -/
section SMul
variable [SMul α β] {f f₁ f₂ : Filter β} {s : Set β} {a : α}
/-- `a • f` is the map of `f` under `a •` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive "`a +ᵥ f` is the map of `f` under `a +ᵥ` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def instSMulFilter : SMul α (Filter β) :=
⟨fun a => map (a • ·)⟩
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.instSMulFilter Filter.instVAddFilter
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
protected theorem map_smul : map (fun b => a • b) f = a • f :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_smul_filter : s ∈ a • f ↔ (a • ·) ⁻¹' s ∈ f := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_mem_smul_filter : s ∈ f → a • s ∈ a • f :=
image_mem_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_filter_bot : a • (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ :=
map_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_filter_eq_bot_iff : a • f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
map_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_filter_neBot_iff : (a • f).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot :=
map_neBot_iff _
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.smul_filter : f.NeBot → (a • f).NeBot := fun h => h.map _
@[to_additive]
theorem NeBot.of_smul_filter : (a • f).NeBot → f.NeBot :=
NeBot.of_map
@[to_additive vadd_filter.instNeBot]
lemma smul_filter.instNeBot [NeBot f] : NeBot (a • f) := .smul_filter ‹_›
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] smul_filter.instNeBot vadd_filter.instNeBot
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_filter_le_smul_filter (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : a • f₁ ≤ a • f₂ :=
map_mono hf
@[to_additive]
instance covariant_smul_filter : CovariantClass α (Filter β) (· • ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ => @map_mono β β _⟩
end SMul
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_filter [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass α β (Filter γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map_comm (funext <| smul_comm _ _) _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_filter' [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass α (Filter β) (Filter γ) :=
⟨fun a _ _ => map_map₂_distrib_right <| smul_comm a⟩
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_filter'' [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass (Filter α) β (Filter γ) :=
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm α β γ
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_left_comm smul_comm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [IsScalarTower α β γ] :
IsScalarTower α β (Filter γ) :=
⟨fun a b f => by simp only [← Filter.map_smul, map_map, smul_assoc]; rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower' [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [IsScalarTower α β γ] :
IsScalarTower α (Filter β) (Filter γ) :=
⟨fun a f g => by
refine (map_map₂_distrib_left fun _ _ => ?_).symm
exact (smul_assoc a _ _).symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isScalarTower'' [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [IsScalarTower α β γ] :
IsScalarTower (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => map₂_assoc smul_assoc⟩
@[to_additive]
instance isCentralScalar [SMul α β] [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ β] [IsCentralScalar α β] :
IsCentralScalar α (Filter β) :=
⟨fun _ f => (congr_arg fun m => map m f) <| funext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
/-- A multiplicative action of a monoid `α` on a type `β` gives a multiplicative action of
`Filter α` on `Filter β`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive action of an additive monoid `α` on a type `β` gives an additive action
of `Filter α` on `Filter β`"]
protected def mulAction [Monoid α] [MulAction α β] : MulAction (Filter α) (Filter β) where
one_smul f := map₂_pure_left.trans <| by simp_rw [one_smul, map_id']
mul_smul _ _ _ := map₂_assoc mul_smul
/-- A multiplicative action of a monoid on a type `β` gives a multiplicative action on `Filter β`.
-/
@[to_additive "An additive action of an additive monoid on a type `β` gives an additive action on
`Filter β`."]
protected def mulActionFilter [Monoid α] [MulAction α β] : MulAction α (Filter β) where
mul_smul a b f := by simp only [← Filter.map_smul, map_map, Function.comp_def, ← mul_smul]
one_smul f := by simp only [← Filter.map_smul, one_smul, map_id']
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Filter.mulAction Filter.addAction Filter.mulActionFilter
Filter.addActionFilter
/-- A distributive multiplicative action of a monoid on an additive monoid `β` gives a distributive
multiplicative action on `Filter β`. -/
protected def distribMulActionFilter [Monoid α] [AddMonoid β] [DistribMulAction α β] :
DistribMulAction α (Filter β) where
smul_add _ _ _ := map_map₂_distrib <| smul_add _
smul_zero _ := (map_pure _ _).trans <| by rw [smul_zero, pure_zero]
/-- A multiplicative action of a monoid on a monoid `β` gives a multiplicative action on `Set β`. -/
protected def mulDistribMulActionFilter [Monoid α] [Monoid β] [MulDistribMulAction α β] :
MulDistribMulAction α (Set β) where
smul_mul _ _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| smul_mul' _
smul_one _ := image_singleton.trans <| by rw [smul_one, singleton_one]
scoped[Pointwise]
attribute [instance] Filter.distribMulActionFilter Filter.mulDistribMulActionFilter
section SMulWithZero
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulWithZero α β] {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
/-!
Note that we have neither `SMulWithZero α (Filter β)` nor `SMulWithZero (Filter α) (Filter β)`
because `0 * ⊥ ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem NeBot.smul_zero_nonneg (hf : f.NeBot) : 0 ≤ f • (0 : Filter β) :=
le_smul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, ha⟩ := hf.nonempty_of_mem h₁
⟨_, ha, _, h₂, smul_zero _⟩
theorem NeBot.zero_smul_nonneg (hg : g.NeBot) : 0 ≤ (0 : Filter α) • g :=
le_smul_iff.2 fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
let ⟨_, hb⟩ := hg.nonempty_of_mem h₂
⟨_, h₁, _, hb, zero_smul _ _⟩
theorem zero_smul_filter_nonpos : (0 : α) • g ≤ 0 := by
refine fun s hs => mem_smul_filter.2 ?_
convert @univ_mem _ g
refine eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun a => ?_
rwa [mem_preimage, zero_smul]
theorem zero_smul_filter (hg : g.NeBot) : (0 : α) • g = 0 :=
zero_smul_filter_nonpos.antisymm <|
le_map_iff.2 fun s hs => by
simp_rw [zero_smul, (hg.nonempty_of_mem hs).image_const]
exact zero_mem_zero
end SMulWithZero
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Pointwise.lean | 1,400 | 1,404 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
ENat.toNat (trailingDegree p)
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) :=
.symm <| ENat.coe_toNat <| mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_inj]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, ENat.toNat_eq_iff hn]
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, h]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p :=
ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n :=
ENat.toNat_le_of_le_coe <| trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe <| support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 :=
Finset.min_eq_bot.trans mem_support_iff
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, or_comm]
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans <| by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p :=
(trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h).trans natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n :=
mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_le] at H
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (hq : q ≠ 0)
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree :=
ENat.toNat_le_toNat hpq <| by simpa
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree (h : (n : ℕ∞) < trailingDegree p) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n < p.natTrailingDegree) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_top n
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {hp : (0 : ℕ∞) < natTrailingDegree p} :
p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree - 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree <|
Nat.sub_lt (WithTop.coe_pos.mp hp) Nat.one_pos
theorem le_trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow n (1 : R)
theorem le_trailingDegree_X : (1 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X : R[X]) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree ≤ 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_eq_zero : trailingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h)
(mem_of_min (trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero : trailingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
not_congr trailingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero : p ≠ 0 → natTrailingDegree p ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.mpr ∘ trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → natTrailingDegree p ≤ a :=
natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' (h : p ≠ 0) :
natTrailingDegree p = p.support.min' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree, ← Finset.coe_min', ENat.some_eq_coe, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem le_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) (hn : ∀ m < n, p.coeff m = 0) :
n ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' hp]
exact Finset.le_min' _ _ _ fun m hm => not_lt.1 fun hmn => mem_support_iff.1 hm <| hn _ hmn
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
· exact le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp)
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(p * X ^ n).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + n := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero fun h => mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp ?_
rwa [trailingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow]
· rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' fun h => hp (mul_X_pow_eq_zero h), Finset.le_min'_iff]
intro y hy
have key : n ≤ y := by
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow'] at hy
exact by_contra fun h => hy (if_neg h)
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow', if_pos key] at hy
exact (le_tsub_iff_right key).mp (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hy)
theorem le_trailingDegree_mul : p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree ≤ (p * q).trailingDegree := by
refine Finset.le_min fun n hn => ?_
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul] at hn
obtain ⟨⟨i, j⟩, hij, hpq⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hn
refine
(add_le_add (min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (left_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))
(min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (right_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))).trans_eq ?_
rwa [← WithTop.coe_add, WithTop.coe_eq_coe, ← mem_antidiagonal]
theorem le_natTrailingDegree_mul (h : p * q ≠ 0) :
p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree ≤ (p * q).natTrailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, mul_zero])
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, WithTop.coe_add, ← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree p),
← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree q), ← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree (p * q)),
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree h]
exact le_trailingDegree_mul
theorem coeff_mul_natTrailingDegree_add_natTrailingDegree : (p * q).coeff
(p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree) = p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff := by
rw [coeff_mul]
refine
Finset.sum_eq_single (p.natTrailingDegree, q.natTrailingDegree) ?_ fun h =>
(h (mem_antidiagonal.mpr rfl)).elim
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h₁ h₂
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at h₁
by_cases hi : i < p.natTrailingDegree
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree hi, zero_mul]
by_cases hj : j < q.natTrailingDegree
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree hj, mul_zero]
rw [not_lt] at hi hj
refine (h₂ (Prod.ext_iff.mpr ?_).symm).elim
exact (add_eq_add_iff_eq_and_eq hi hj).mp h₁.symm
theorem trailingDegree_mul' (h : p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, trailingCoeff_zero, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, trailingCoeff_zero, mul_zero])
refine le_antisymm ?_ le_trailingDegree_mul
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq, ←
ENat.coe_add]
apply trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
rwa [coeff_mul_natTrailingDegree_add_natTrailingDegree]
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul' (h : p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, trailingCoeff_zero, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, trailingCoeff_zero, mul_zero])
apply natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some
rw [trailingDegree_mul' h, Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree p + natTrailingDegree q),
WithTop.coe_add, ← Nat.cast_withTop, ← Nat.cast_withTop,
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq]
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul [NoZeroDivisors R] (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree :=
natTrailingDegree_mul'
(mul_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp) (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hq))
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_one : trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_X : trailingDegree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
trailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree = 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).trailingDegree = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma natTrailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, natTrailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero]
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : trailingDegree (-p) = trailingDegree p := by
unfold trailingDegree
rw [support_neg]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natTrailingDegree (-p) = natTrailingDegree p := by
simp [natTrailingDegree]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_intCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- The second-lowest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeffUp (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natTrailingDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree + 1)
@[simp] lemma nextCoeffUp_zero : nextCoeffUp (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp [nextCoeffUp]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeffUp_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeffUp (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeffUp]
simp
theorem nextCoeffUp_of_constantCoeff_eq_zero (p : R[X]) (hp : coeff p 0 = 0) :
nextCoeffUp p = p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree + 1) := by
obtain rfl | hp₀ := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
· rw [nextCoeffUp, if_neg (natTrailingDegree_ne_zero.2 ⟨hp₀, hp⟩)]
end Semiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero_of_trailingDegree_lt
(h : trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q) : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree <| natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree.trans_lt h
theorem ne_zero_of_trailingDegree_lt {n : ℕ∞} (h : trailingDegree p < n) : p ≠ 0 := fun h₀ =>
h.not_le (by simp [h₀])
lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_ne_zero (h : constantCoeff p ≠ 0) :
p.natTrailingDegree = 0 :=
le_antisymm (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h) zero_le'
namespace Monic
lemma eq_X_pow_iff_natDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (h₁ : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree ↔ p.natDegree ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· nontriviality R
rw [h, natTrailingDegree_X_pow, ← h]
· ext n
rw [coeff_X_pow]
obtain hn | rfl | hn := lt_trichotomy n p.natDegree
· rw [if_neg hn.ne, coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree (hn.trans_le h)]
· simpa only [if_pos rfl] using h₁.leadingCoeff
· rw [if_neg hn.ne', coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hn]
lemma eq_X_pow_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_natDegree (h₁ : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = p.natDegree :=
h₁.eq_X_pow_iff_natDegree_le_natTrailingDegree.trans (natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree p).ge_iff_eq
end Monic
end Semiring
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 514 | 515 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
section congr
variable {g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.congr (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.congr (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.congr (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.congr (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
end congr
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
theorem ConvexOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem ConcaveOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
theorem LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.2 ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is concave it suffices to
verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`. The
main use case is `E = ℝ` however one can apply it, e.g., to `ℝ^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly convex, it suffices
to verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly concave it suffices
to verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
end LinearOrder
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If `g` is convex on `s`, so is `(f ∘ g)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.linear_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (g (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [g.map_add, g.map_smul, g.map_smul]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If `g` is concave on `s`, so is `(g ∘ f)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_linearMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
add_comm g f ▸ hg.add_convexOn hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.add (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_concaveOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_convexOn hg.dual
theorem ConcaveOn.add_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_strictConvexOn hg.dual
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_convexOn (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_concaveOn (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • r + b • r :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hx.2 ha)
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hy.2.le hb.le))
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab _⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
theorem ConvexOn.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ f q.1 ≤ q.2) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } := by
rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine ⟨hf.1 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • p.1 + b • q.1) ≤ a • f p.1 + b • f q.1 := hf.2 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • p.2 + b • q.2 := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hp.2 ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hq.2 hb.le)
theorem ConcaveOn.openSegment_subset_strict_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ q.2 ≤ f q.1) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp hq
theorem ConvexOn.convex_strict_epigraph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.mpr fun p hp q hq =>
hf.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp ⟨hq.1, hq.2.le⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_strict_hypograph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_strict_epigraph
end Module
end OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
{f g : E → β}
/-- The pointwise maximum of convex functions is convex. -/
theorem ConvexOn.sup (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) := by
refine ⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => sup_le ?_ ?_⟩
· calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left
· calc
g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • g x + b • g y := hg.right hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right
/-- The pointwise minimum of concave functions is concave. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.inf (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
/-- The pointwise maximum of strictly convex functions is strictly convex. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.sup (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
max_lt
(calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_left)
(calc
g (a • x + b • y) < a • g x + b • g y := hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • (f x ⊔ g x) + b • (f y ⊔ g y) := by gcongr <;> apply le_sup_right)⟩
/-- The pointwise minimum of strictly concave functions is strictly concave. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.inf (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) {a b : 𝕜}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A convex function on a segment is upper-bounded by the max of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConvexOn.le_on_segment (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : f z ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.le_on_segment' hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A concave function on a segment is lower-bounded by the min of its endpoints. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.ge_on_segment (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ [x -[𝕜] y]) : min (f x) (f y) ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_on_segment hx hy hz
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
f (a • x + b • y) < max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • max (f x) (f y) + b • max (f x) (f y) := by
gcongr
· apply le_max_left
· apply le_max_right
_ = max (f x) (f y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_open_segment' (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) {a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
min (f x) (f y) < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A strictly convex function on an open segment is strictly upper-bounded by the max of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : f z < max (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨_, _, ha, hb, hab, hz⟩ := hz
hz ▸ hf.lt_on_open_segment' hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A strictly concave function on an open segment is strictly lower-bounded by the min of its
endpoints. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.lt_on_openSegment (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) : min (f x) (f y) < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_on_openSegment hx hy hxy hz
end LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section OrderedSMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x :=
le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left h ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y) :
f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) ≤ f x) :
f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
theorem ConvexOn.le_left_of_right_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_left_of_right_le' hx hy ha hb.le hab hyz
theorem ConcaveOn.left_le_of_le_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z ≤ f y) : f x ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_left_of_right_le hx hy hz hyz
theorem ConvexOn.le_right_of_left_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x ≤ f z) : f z ≤ f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.le_right_of_left_le' hx hy ha.le hb hab hxz
theorem ConcaveOn.right_le_of_le_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z ≤ f x) : f y ≤ f z :=
hf.dual.le_right_of_left_le hx hy hz hxz
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/- The following lemmas don't require `Module 𝕜 E` if you add the hypothesis `x ≠ y`. At the time of
the writing, we decided the resulting lemmas wouldn't be useful. Feel free to reintroduce them. -/
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f x :=
not_le.1 fun h ↦ lt_irrefl (f (a • x + b • y)) <|
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • f (a • x + b • y) + b • f (a • x + b • y) := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le) (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hfy hb)
_ = f (a • x + b • y) := Convex.combo_self hab _
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
{a b : 𝕜} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfy : f (a • x + b • y) < f y) :
f x < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfy
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f x < f (a • x + b • y)) :
f (a • x + b • y) < f y := by
rw [add_comm] at hab hfx ⊢
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hy hx hb ha hab hfx
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt' (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (hfx : f (a • x + b • y) < f x) :
f y < f (a • x + b • y) :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hfx
theorem ConvexOn.lt_left_of_right_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f y < f z) : f z < f x := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_left_of_right_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hyz
theorem ConcaveOn.left_lt_of_lt_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hyz : f z < f y) : f x < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_left_of_right_lt hx hy hz hyz
theorem ConvexOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f x < f z) : f z < f y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩ := hz
exact hf.lt_right_of_left_lt' hx hy ha hb hab hxz
theorem ConcaveOn.lt_right_of_left_lt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) {x y z : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hz : z ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x y) (hxz : f z < f x) : f y < f z :=
hf.dual.lt_right_of_left_lt hx hy hz hxz
end Module
end LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
{s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
/-- A function `-f` is convex iff `f` is concave. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_convexOn_iff : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
simp? [neg_apply, neg_le, add_comm] at h says
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, le_add_neg_iff_add_le, add_comm,
add_neg_le_iff_le_add] at h
exact h hx hy ha hb hab
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff]
simp_rw [neg_add, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_neg]
exact h hx hy ha hb hab
/-- A function `-f` is concave iff `f` is convex. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_concaveOn_iff : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
rw [← neg_convexOn_iff, neg_neg f]
/-- A function `-f` is strictly convex iff `f` is strictly concave. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_strictConvexOn_iff : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
simp only [ne_eq, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, lt_add_neg_iff_add_lt, add_comm,
add_neg_lt_iff_lt_add] at h
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
· rintro ⟨hconv, h⟩
refine ⟨hconv, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff]
simp_rw [neg_add, Pi.neg_apply, smul_neg, neg_neg]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
/-- A function `-f` is strictly concave iff `f` is strictly convex. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_strictConcaveOn_iff : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (-f) ↔ StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
rw [← neg_strictConvexOn_iff, neg_neg f]
alias ⟨_, ConcaveOn.neg⟩ := neg_convexOn_iff
alias ⟨_, ConvexOn.neg⟩ := neg_concaveOn_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictConcaveOn.neg⟩ := neg_strictConvexOn_iff
alias ⟨_, StrictConvexOn.neg⟩ := neg_strictConcaveOn_iff
theorem ConvexOn.sub (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem ConcaveOn.sub (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem StrictConvexOn.sub (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem StrictConcaveOn.sub (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
theorem ConvexOn.sub_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_strictConvexOn hg.neg
theorem ConcaveOn.sub_strictConvexOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_strictConcaveOn hg.neg
theorem StrictConvexOn.sub_concaveOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_convexOn hg.neg
theorem StrictConcaveOn.sub_convexOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add_concaveOn hg.neg
end OrderedAddCommGroup
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCancelCommMonoid
variable [AddCancelCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β]
{s : Set E}
{f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves strict convexity. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.translate_right (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ < a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ((add_right_injective c).ne hxy) ha hb hab⟩
/-- Right translation preserves strict concavity. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves strict convexity. -/
theorem StrictConvexOn.translate_left (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves strict concavity. -/
theorem StrictConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hf.translate_right c
end AddCancelCommMonoid
end OrderedSemiring
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.smul {c : 𝕜} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun x => c • f x :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
c • f (a • x + b • y) ≤ c • (a • f x + b • f y) :=
smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) hc
_ = a • c • f x + b • c • f y := by rw [smul_add, smul_comm c, smul_comm c]⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.smul {c : 𝕜} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun x => c • f x :=
hf.dual.smul hc
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
end OrderedCommSemiring
section OrderedRing
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If a function is convex on `s`, it remains convex when precomposed by an affine map. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_affineMap {f : F → β} (g : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.affine_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
(f ∘ g) (a • x + b • y) = f (g (a • x + b • y)) := rfl
_ = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [Convex.combo_affine_apply hab]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If a function is concave on `s`, it remains concave when precomposed by an affine map. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_affineMap {f : F → β} (g : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F) {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_affineMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
theorem convexOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b →
f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) ≤ (a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y :=
and_congr Iff.rfl ⟨by
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
apply h hx hy (div_nonneg ha hab.le) (div_nonneg hb hab.le)
rw [← add_div, div_self hab.ne'], by
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
simpa [hab, zero_lt_one] using h hx hy ha hb⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b →
(a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y ≤ f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) :=
convexOn_iff_div (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem strictConvexOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) < (a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y :=
and_congr Iff.rfl ⟨by
intro h x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb
have hab := add_pos ha hb
apply h hx hy hxy (div_pos ha hab) (div_pos hb hab)
rw [← add_div, div_self hab.ne'], by
intro h x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
simpa [hab, zero_lt_one] using h hx hy hxy ha hb⟩
theorem strictConcaveOn_iff_div {f : E → β} :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
(a / (a + b)) • f x + (b / (a + b)) • f y < f ((a / (a + b)) • x + (b / (a + b)) • y) :=
strictConvexOn_iff_div (β := βᵒᵈ)
end SMul
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
end LinearOrderedField
section OrderIso
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [SMul 𝕜 α]
[AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [SMul 𝕜 β]
theorem OrderIso.strictConvexOn_symm (f : α ≃o β) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 univ f) :
| StrictConvexOn 𝕜 univ f.symm := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x', hx''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y', hy''⟩ := f.surjective.exists.mp ⟨y, rfl⟩
have hxy' : x' ≠ y' := by rw [← f.injective.ne_iff, ← hx'', ← hy'']; exact hxy
simp only [hx'', hy'', OrderIso.symm_apply_apply, gt_iff_lt]
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 1,015 | 1,021 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Generalize
/-!
# McShane integrability vs Bochner integrability
In this file we prove that any Bochner integrable function is McShane integrable (hence, it is
Henstock and `GP` integrable) with the same integral. The proof is based on
[Russel A. Gordon, *The integrals of Lebesgue, Denjoy, Perron, and Henstock*][Gordon55].
We deduce that the same is true for the Riemann integral for continuous functions.
## Tags
integral, McShane integral, Bochner integral
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
universe u v
variable {ι : Type u} {E : Type v} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Finset Filter BoxIntegral
namespace BoxIntegral
/-- The indicator function of a measurable set is McShane integrable with respect to any
locally-finite measure. -/
theorem hasIntegralIndicatorConst (l : IntegrationParams) (hl : l.bRiemann = false)
{s : Set (ι → ℝ)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (I : Box ι) (y : E) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ))
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] :
HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l (s.indicator fun _ => y) μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul
(μ.real (s ∩ I) • y) := by
refine HasIntegral.of_mul ‖y‖ fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le; rw [NNReal.coe_pos] at ε0
/- First we choose a closed set `F ⊆ s ∩ I.Icc` and an open set `U ⊇ s` such that
both `(s ∩ I.Icc) \ F` and `U \ s` have measure less than `ε`. -/
have A : μ (s ∩ Box.Icc I) ≠ ∞ :=
((measure_mono Set.inter_subset_right).trans_lt (I.measure_Icc_lt_top μ)).ne
have B : μ (s ∩ I) ≠ ∞ :=
((measure_mono Set.inter_subset_right).trans_lt (I.measure_coe_lt_top μ)).ne
obtain ⟨F, hFs, hFc, hμF⟩ : ∃ F, F ⊆ s ∩ Box.Icc I ∧ IsClosed F ∧ μ ((s ∩ Box.Icc I) \ F) < ε :=
(hs.inter I.measurableSet_Icc).exists_isClosed_diff_lt A (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne'
obtain ⟨U, hsU, hUo, hUt, hμU⟩ :
∃ U, s ∩ Box.Icc I ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < ∞ ∧ μ (U \ (s ∩ Box.Icc I)) < ε :=
(hs.inter I.measurableSet_Icc).exists_isOpen_diff_lt A (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne'
/- Then we choose `r` so that `closed_ball x (r x) ⊆ U` whenever `x ∈ s ∩ I.Icc` and
`closed_ball x (r x)` is disjoint with `F` otherwise. -/
have : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Box.Icc I, ∃ r : Ioi (0 : ℝ), closedBall x r ⊆ U := fun x hx => by
rcases nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 (hUo.mem_nhds <| hsU hx) with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨⟨r, hr₀⟩, hr⟩
choose! rs hrsU using this
have : ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I \ s, ∃ r : Ioi (0 : ℝ), closedBall x r ⊆ Fᶜ := fun x hx => by
obtain ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩ :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 (hFc.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds fun hx' => hx.2 (hFs hx').1)
exact ⟨⟨r, hr₀⟩, hr⟩
choose! rs' hrs'F using this
classical
set r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ) := s.piecewise rs rs'
refine ⟨fun _ => r, fun c => l.rCond_of_bRiemann_eq_false hl, fun c π hπ hπp => ?_⟩; rw [mul_comm]
/- Then the union of boxes `J ∈ π` such that `π.tag ∈ s` includes `F` and is included by `U`,
hence its measure is `ε`-close to the measure of `s`. -/
dsimp [integralSum]
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm, ← indicator_const_smul_apply,
sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter, ← sum_smul, ← sub_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ←
Prepartition.filter_boxes, ← Prepartition.measure_iUnion_toReal]
gcongr
set t := (π.filter (π.tag · ∈ s)).iUnion
change abs (μ.real t - μ.real (s ∩ I)) ≤ ε
have htU : t ⊆ U ∩ I := by
simp only [t, TaggedPrepartition.iUnion_def, iUnion_subset_iff, TaggedPrepartition.mem_filter,
and_imp]
refine fun J hJ hJs x hx => ⟨hrsU _ ⟨hJs, π.tag_mem_Icc J⟩ ?_, π.le_of_mem' J hJ hx⟩
simpa only [r, s.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ hJs] using hπ.1 J hJ (Box.coe_subset_Icc hx)
refine abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· refine (ENNReal.le_toReal_sub B).trans (ENNReal.toReal_le_coe_of_le_coe ?_)
refine (tsub_le_tsub (measure_mono htU) le_rfl).trans (le_measure_diff.trans ?_)
refine (measure_mono fun x hx => ?_).trans hμU.le
exact ⟨hx.1.1, fun hx' => hx.2 ⟨hx'.1, hx.1.2⟩⟩
· have hμt : μ t ≠ ∞ := ((measure_mono (htU.trans inter_subset_left)).trans_lt hUt).ne
refine (ENNReal.le_toReal_sub hμt).trans (ENNReal.toReal_le_coe_of_le_coe ?_)
refine le_measure_diff.trans ((measure_mono ?_).trans hμF.le)
rintro x ⟨⟨hxs, hxI⟩, hxt⟩
refine ⟨⟨hxs, Box.coe_subset_Icc hxI⟩, fun hxF => hxt ?_⟩
simp only [t, TaggedPrepartition.iUnion_def, TaggedPrepartition.mem_filter, Set.mem_iUnion]
rcases hπp x hxI with ⟨J, hJπ, hxJ⟩
refine ⟨J, ⟨hJπ, ?_⟩, hxJ⟩
contrapose hxF
refine hrs'F _ ⟨π.tag_mem_Icc J, hxF⟩ ?_
simpa only [r, s.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ hxF] using hπ.1 J hJπ (Box.coe_subset_Icc hxJ)
/-- If `f` is a.e. equal to zero on a rectangular box, then it has McShane integral zero on this
box. -/
theorem HasIntegral.of_aeEq_zero {l : IntegrationParams} {I : Box ι} {f : (ι → ℝ) → E}
{μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict I] 0)
(hl : l.bRiemann = false) : HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul 0 := by
/- Each set `{x | n < ‖f x‖ ≤ n + 1}`, `n : ℕ`, has measure zero. We cover it by an open set of
measure less than `ε / 2 ^ n / (n + 1)`. Then the norm of the integral sum is less than `ε`. -/
refine hasIntegral_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.lt.le; rw [gt_iff_lt, NNReal.coe_pos] at ε0
rcases NNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable ε0.ne' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, c, hδc, hcε⟩
haveI := Fact.mk (I.measure_coe_lt_top μ)
change μ.restrict I {x | f x ≠ 0} = 0 at hf
set N : (ι → ℝ) → ℕ := fun x => ⌈‖f x‖⌉₊
have N0 : ∀ {x}, N x = 0 ↔ f x = 0 := by simp [N]
have : ∀ n, ∃ U, N ⁻¹' {n} ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ.restrict I U < δ n / n := fun n ↦ by
refine (N ⁻¹' {n}).exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ ?_
rcases n with - | n
· simp [ENNReal.div_zero (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 (δ0 _)).ne']
· refine (measure_mono_null ?_ hf).le.trans_lt ?_
· exact fun x hxN hxf => n.succ_ne_zero ((Eq.symm hxN).trans <| N0.2 hxf)
· simp [(δ0 _).ne']
choose U hNU hUo hμU using this
have : ∀ x, ∃ r : Ioi (0 : ℝ), closedBall x r ⊆ U (N x) := fun x => by
obtain ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩ := nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 ((hUo _).mem_nhds (hNU _ rfl))
exact ⟨⟨r, hr₀⟩, hr⟩
choose r hrU using this
refine ⟨fun _ => r, fun c => l.rCond_of_bRiemann_eq_false hl, fun c π hπ _ => ?_⟩
rw [dist_eq_norm, sub_zero, ← integralSum_fiberwise fun J => N (π.tag J)]
refine le_trans ?_ (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hcε).le
refine (norm_sum_le_of_le _ ?_).trans
(sum_le_hasSum _ (fun n _ => (δ n).2) (NNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hδc))
rintro n -
dsimp [integralSum]
have : ∀ J ∈ π.filter fun J => N (π.tag J) = n,
‖μ.real ↑J • f (π.tag J)‖ ≤ μ.real J * n := fun J hJ ↦ by
rw [TaggedPrepartition.mem_filter] at hJ
rw [norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg]
gcongr
exact hJ.2 ▸ Nat.le_ceil _
refine (norm_sum_le_of_le _ this).trans ?_; clear this
rw [← sum_mul, ← Prepartition.measure_iUnion_toReal]
let m := μ (π.filter fun J => N (π.tag J) = n).iUnion
show m.toReal * ↑n ≤ ↑(δ n)
have : m < δ n / n := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_apply (hUo _).measurableSet] at hμU
refine (measure_mono ?_).trans_lt (hμU _)
simp only [Set.subset_def, TaggedPrepartition.mem_iUnion, TaggedPrepartition.mem_filter]
rintro x ⟨J, ⟨hJ, rfl⟩, hx⟩
exact ⟨hrU _ (hπ.1 _ hJ (Box.coe_subset_Icc hx)), π.le_of_mem' J hJ hx⟩
clear_value m
lift m to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_lt this
rw [ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← NNReal.coe_natCast, ← NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_le_coe, ←
ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ENNReal.coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_natCast, mul_comm]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' this.le _).trans ENNReal.mul_div_le
/-- If `f` has integral `y` on a box `I` with respect to a locally finite measure `μ` and `g` is
a.e. equal to `f` on `I`, then `g` has the same integral on `I`. -/
theorem HasIntegral.congr_ae {l : IntegrationParams} {I : Box ι} {y : E} {f g : (ι → ℝ) → E}
{μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul y) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict I] g)
(hl : l.bRiemann = false) : HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l g μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul y := by
have : g - f =ᵐ[μ.restrict I] 0 := hfg.mono fun x hx => sub_eq_zero.2 hx.symm
simpa using hf.add (HasIntegral.of_aeEq_zero this hl)
end BoxIntegral
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace SimpleFunc
/-- A simple function is McShane integrable w.r.t. any locally finite measure. -/
theorem hasBoxIntegral (f : SimpleFunc (ι → ℝ) E) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
(I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (hl : l.bRiemann = false) :
HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul (f.integral (μ.restrict I)) := by
induction f using MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.induction with
| @const y s hs =>
simpa [hs] using BoxIntegral.hasIntegralIndicatorConst l hl hs I y μ
| @add f g _ hfi hgi =>
borelize E; haveI := Fact.mk (I.measure_coe_lt_top μ)
rw [integral_add]
exacts [hfi.add hgi, integrable_iff.2 fun _ _ => measure_lt_top _ _,
integrable_iff.2 fun _ _ => measure_lt_top _ _]
/-- For a simple function, its McShane (or Henstock, or `⊥`) box integral is equal to its
integral in the sense of `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral`. -/
theorem box_integral_eq_integral (f : SimpleFunc (ι → ℝ) E) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ))
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) (hl : l.bRiemann = false) :
BoxIntegral.integral.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul = f.integral (μ.restrict I) :=
(f.hasBoxIntegral μ I l hl).integral_eq
end SimpleFunc
open TopologicalSpace
/-- If `f : ℝⁿ → E` is Bochner integrable w.r.t. a locally finite measure `μ` on a rectangular box
`I`, then it is McShane integrable on `I` with the same integral. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.hasBoxIntegral [CompleteSpace E] {f : (ι → ℝ) → E} {μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {I : Box ι} (hf : IntegrableOn f I μ) (l : IntegrationParams)
(hl : l.bRiemann = false) :
HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul (∫ x in I, f x ∂μ) := by
borelize E
-- First we replace an `ae_strongly_measurable` function by a measurable one.
rcases hf.aestronglyMeasurable with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
| haveI : SeparableSpace (range g ∪ {0} : Set E) := hg.separableSpace_range_union_singleton
rw [integral_congr_ae hfg]; have hgi : IntegrableOn g I μ := (integrable_congr hfg).1 hf
refine BoxIntegral.HasIntegral.congr_ae ?_ hfg.symm hl
clear! f
/- Now consider the sequence of simple functions
`SimpleFunc.approxOn g hg.measurable (range g ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)`
approximating `g`. Recall some properties of this sequence. -/
set f : ℕ → SimpleFunc (ι → ℝ) E :=
SimpleFunc.approxOn g hg.measurable (range g ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp)
have hfi : ∀ n, IntegrableOn (f n) I μ :=
SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn_range hg.measurable hgi
have hfi' := fun n => ((f n).hasBoxIntegral μ I l hl).integrable
have hfg_mono : ∀ (x) {m n}, m ≤ n → ‖f n x - g x‖ ≤ ‖f m x - g x‖ := by
intro x m n hmn
rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm, dist_nndist, dist_nndist, NNReal.coe_le_coe, ←
ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← edist_nndist, ← edist_nndist]
exact SimpleFunc.edist_approxOn_mono hg.measurable _ x hmn
/- Now consider `ε > 0`. We need to find `r` such that for any tagged partition subordinate
to `r`, the integral sum is `(μ I + 1 + 1) * ε`-close to the Bochner integral. -/
refine HasIntegral.of_mul (μ.real I + 1 + 1) fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le; rw [NNReal.coe_pos] at ε0; have ε0' := ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0
-- Choose `N` such that the integral of `‖f N x - g x‖` is less than or equal to `ε`.
obtain ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∫ x in I, ‖f N x - g x‖ ∂μ ≤ ε := by
have : Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x in I, ‖f n x - g x‖₊ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_range_L1_enorm hg.measurable hgi
refine (this.eventually (ge_mem_nhds ε0')).exists.imp fun N hN => ?_
exact integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le hN
-- For each `x`, we choose `Nx x ≥ N₀` such that `dist (f Nx x) (g x) ≤ ε`.
have : ∀ x, ∃ N₁, N₀ ≤ N₁ ∧ dist (f N₁ x) (g x) ≤ ε := fun x ↦ by
have : Tendsto (f · x) atTop (𝓝 <| g x) :=
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hg.measurable _ (subset_closure (by simp))
exact ((eventually_ge_atTop N₀).and <| this <| closedBall_mem_nhds _ ε0).exists
choose Nx hNx hNxε using this
-- We also choose a convergent series with `∑' i : ℕ, δ i < ε`.
rcases NNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable ε0.ne' ℕ with ⟨δ, δ0, c, hδc, hcε⟩
/- Since each simple function `fᵢ` is integrable, there exists `rᵢ : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` such that
the integral sum of `f` over any tagged prepartition is `δᵢ`-close to the sum of integrals
of `fᵢ` over the boxes of this prepartition. For each `x`, we choose `r (Nx x)` as the radius
at `x`. -/
set r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ) := fun c x => (hfi' <| Nx x).convergenceR (δ <| Nx x) c x
refine ⟨r, fun c => l.rCond_of_bRiemann_eq_false hl, fun c π hπ hπp => ?_⟩
/- Now we prove the estimate in 3 "jumps": first we replace `g x` in the formula for the
integral sum by `f (Nx x)`; then we replace each `μ J • f (Nx (π.tag J)) (π.tag J)`
by the Bochner integral of `f (Nx (π.tag J)) x` over `J`, then we jump to the Bochner
integral of `g`. -/
refine (dist_triangle4 _ (∑ J ∈ π.boxes, μ.real J • f (Nx <| π.tag J) (π.tag J))
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∫ x in J, f (Nx <| π.tag J) x ∂μ) _).trans ?_
rw [add_mul, add_mul, one_mul]
refine add_le_add_three ?_ ?_ ?_
· /- Since each `f (Nx <| π.tag J)` is `ε`-close to `g (π.tag J)`, replacing the latter with
the former in the formula for the integral sum changes the sum at most by `μ I * ε`. -/
rw [← hπp.iUnion_eq, π.measure_iUnion_toReal, sum_mul, integralSum]
refine dist_sum_sum_le_of_le _ fun J _ => ?_; dsimp
rw [dist_eq_norm, ← smul_sub, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg measureReal_nonneg]
gcongr
rw [← dist_eq_norm']; exact hNxε _
· /- We group the terms of both sums by the values of `Nx (π.tag J)`.
For each `N`, the sum of Bochner integrals over the boxes is equal
to the sum of box integrals, and the sum of box integrals is `δᵢ`-close
to the corresponding integral sum due to the Henstock-Sacks inequality. -/
rw [← π.sum_fiberwise fun J => Nx (π.tag J), ← π.sum_fiberwise fun J => Nx (π.tag J)]
refine le_trans ?_ (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hcε).le
refine
(dist_sum_sum_le_of_le _ fun n hn => ?_).trans
(sum_le_hasSum _ (fun n _ => (δ n).2) (NNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hδc))
have hNxn : ∀ J ∈ π.filter fun J => Nx (π.tag J) = n, Nx (π.tag J) = n := fun J hJ =>
(π.mem_filter.1 hJ).2
have hrn : ∀ J ∈ π.filter fun J => Nx (π.tag J) = n,
r c (π.tag J) = (hfi' n).convergenceR (δ n) c (π.tag J) := fun J hJ ↦ by
obtain rfl := hNxn J hJ
rfl
have :
l.MemBaseSet I c ((hfi' n).convergenceR (δ n) c) (π.filter fun J => Nx (π.tag J) = n) :=
(hπ.filter _).mono' _ le_rfl le_rfl fun J hJ => (hrn J hJ).le
convert (hfi' n).dist_integralSum_sum_integral_le_of_memBaseSet (δ0 _) this using 2
· refine sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_
simp [hNxn J hJ]
· refine sum_congr rfl fun J hJ => ?_
rw [← SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral, SimpleFunc.box_integral_eq_integral _ _ _ _ hl,
hNxn J hJ]
exact (hfi _).mono_set (Prepartition.le_of_mem _ hJ)
· /- For the last jump, we use the fact that the distance between `f (Nx x) x` and `g x` is less
than or equal to the distance between `f N₀ x` and `g x` and the integral of
`‖f N₀ x - g x‖` is less than or equal to `ε`. -/
refine le_trans ?_ hN₀
have hfi : ∀ (n), ∀ J ∈ π, IntegrableOn (f n) (↑J) μ := fun n J hJ =>
(hfi n).mono_set (π.le_of_mem' J hJ)
have hgi : ∀ J ∈ π, IntegrableOn g (↑J) μ := fun J hJ => hgi.mono_set (π.le_of_mem' J hJ)
have hfgi : ∀ (n), ∀ J ∈ π, IntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f n x - g x‖) J μ := fun n J hJ =>
((hfi n J hJ).sub (hgi J hJ)).norm
rw [← hπp.iUnion_eq, Prepartition.iUnion_def',
integral_finset_biUnion π.boxes (fun J _ => J.measurableSet_coe) π.pairwiseDisjoint hgi,
integral_finset_biUnion π.boxes (fun J _ => J.measurableSet_coe) π.pairwiseDisjoint (hfgi _)]
refine dist_sum_sum_le_of_le _ fun J hJ => ?_
rw [dist_eq_norm, ← integral_sub (hfi _ J hJ) (hgi J hJ)]
refine norm_integral_le_of_norm_le (hfgi _ J hJ) (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
exact hfg_mono x (hNx (π.tag J))
/-- If `f : ℝⁿ → E` is continuous on a rectangular box `I`, then it is Box integrable on `I`
w.r.t. a locally finite measure `μ` with the same integral. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.hasBoxIntegral [CompleteSpace E] {f : (ι → ℝ) → E} (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ))
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {I : Box ι} (hc : ContinuousOn f (Box.Icc I))
(l : IntegrationParams) :
HasIntegral.{u, v, v} I l f μ.toBoxAdditive.toSMul (∫ x in I, f x ∂μ) := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Integrability.lean | 202 | 305 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_
/-!
# The category of module objects over a monoid object.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
variable {C}
/-- A module object for a monoid object, all internal to some monoidal category. -/
structure Mod_ (A : Mon_ C) where
/-- The underlying object in the ambient monoidal category -/
X : C
/-- The action morphism of the module object -/
act : A.X ⊗ X ⟶ X
one_act : (A.one ▷ X) ≫ act = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
assoc : (A.mul ▷ X) ≫ act = (α_ A.X A.X X).hom ≫ (A.X ◁ act) ≫ act := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Mod_.one_act Mod_.assoc
namespace Mod_
variable {A : Mon_ C} (M : Mod_ A)
theorem assoc_flip :
(A.X ◁ M.act) ≫ M.act = (α_ A.X A.X M.X).inv ≫ (A.mul ▷ M.X) ≫ M.act := by simp
|
/-- A morphism of module objects. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Mod_.lean | 37 | 38 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
· apply le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (exp_pos 1).le hx0) (exp_nonneg x)
· have h := add_one_le_exp (log x)
rwa [← exp_le_exp, exp_add, exp_log (lt_of_not_le hx0), mul_comm] at h
theorem two_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : 2 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x < 0
· exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (by simp only [Nat.ofNat_nonneg]) hx0.le)
(exp_nonneg x)
· apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (le_of_not_lt hx0)) exp_one_mul_le_exp
have := Real.add_one_le_exp 1
rwa [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℝ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `log 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma log_div_self (x : ℝ) : log (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
| theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 122 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
/-!
# N-ary maps of filter
This file defines the binary and ternary maps of filters. This is mostly useful to define pointwise
operations on filters.
## Main declarations
* `Filter.map₂`: Binary map of filters.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Data.Finset.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
-/
open Function Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' : Type*} {m : α → β → γ} {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
{g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {h : Filter γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {u : Set γ}
{a : α} {b : β}
/-- The image of a binary function `m : α → β → γ` as a function `Filter α → Filter β → Filter γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter γ :=
((f ×ˢ g).map (uncurry m)).copy { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ v ∈ g, image2 m u v ⊆ s } fun _ ↦ by
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff, image2_subset_iff, prod_subset_iff]; rfl
@[simp 900]
theorem mem_map₂_iff : u ∈ map₂ m f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, image2 m s t ⊆ u :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image2_mem_map₂ (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : image2 m s t ∈ map₂ m f g :=
⟨_, hs, _, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
theorem map_prod_eq_map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.map (fun p : α × β => m p.1 p.2) (f ×ˢ g) = map₂ m f g := by
rw [map₂, copy_eq, uncurry_def]
theorem map_prod_eq_map₂' (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.map m (f ×ˢ g) = map₂ (fun a b => m (a, b)) f g :=
map_prod_eq_map₂ m.curry f g
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_eq_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : map₂ Prod.mk f g = f ×ˢ g := by
simp only [← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_id']
-- lemma image2_mem_map₂_iff (hm : injective2 m) : image2 m s t ∈ map₂ m f g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
-- ⟨by { rintro ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h⟩, rw image2_subset_image2_iff hm at h,
-- exact ⟨mem_of_superset hu h.1, mem_of_superset hv h.2⟩ }, fun h ↦ image2_mem_map₂ h.1 h.2⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem map₂_mono (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) : map₂ m f₁ g₁ ≤ map₂ m f₂ g₂ :=
fun _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ => ⟨s, hf hs, t, hg ht, hst⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem map₂_mono_left (h : g₁ ≤ g₂) : map₂ m f g₁ ≤ map₂ m f g₂ :=
map₂_mono Subset.rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem map₂_mono_right (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : map₂ m f₁ g ≤ map₂ m f₂ g :=
map₂_mono h Subset.rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_map₂_iff {h : Filter γ} :
h ≤ map₂ m f g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → image2 m s t ∈ h :=
⟨fun H _ hs _ ht => H <| image2_mem_map₂ hs ht, fun H _ ⟨_, hs, _, ht, hu⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (H hs ht) hu⟩
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_bot_iff : map₂ m f g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by simp [← map_prod_eq_map₂]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_left : map₂ m ⊥ g = ⊥ := map₂_eq_bot_iff.2 <| .inl rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_right : map₂ m f ⊥ = ⊥ := map₂_eq_bot_iff.2 <| .inr rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_neBot_iff : (map₂ m f g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot := by simp [neBot_iff, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.map₂ (hf : f.NeBot) (hg : g.NeBot) : (map₂ m f g).NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance map₂.neBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (map₂ m f g) := .map₂ ‹_› ‹_›
theorem NeBot.of_map₂_left (h : (map₂ m f g).NeBot) : f.NeBot :=
(map₂_neBot_iff.1 h).1
theorem NeBot.of_map₂_right (h : (map₂ m f g).NeBot) : g.NeBot :=
(map₂_neBot_iff.1 h).2
theorem map₂_sup_left : map₂ m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) g = map₂ m f₁ g ⊔ map₂ m f₂ g := by
simp_rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, sup_prod, map_sup]
theorem map₂_sup_right : map₂ m f (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = map₂ m f g₁ ⊔ map₂ m f g₂ := by
simp_rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, prod_sup, map_sup]
theorem map₂_inf_subset_left : map₂ m (f₁ ⊓ f₂) g ≤ map₂ m f₁ g ⊓ map₂ m f₂ g :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ map₂_mono_right) f₁ f₂
theorem map₂_inf_subset_right : map₂ m f (g₁ ⊓ g₂) ≤ map₂ m f g₁ ⊓ map₂ m f g₂ :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ map₂_mono_left) g₁ g₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_pure_left : map₂ m (pure a) g = g.map (m a) := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, pure_prod, map_map]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_pure_right : map₂ m f (pure b) = f.map (m · b) := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, prod_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem map₂_pure : map₂ m (pure a) (pure b) = pure (m a b) := by rw [map₂_pure_right, map_pure]
theorem map₂_swap (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map₂ m f g = map₂ (fun a b => m b a) g f := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, prod_comm, map_map, ← map_prod_eq_map₂, Function.comp_def]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_left [NeBot g] : map₂ (fun x _ => x) f g = f := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_fst_prod]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_right [NeBot f] : map₂ (fun _ y => y) f g = g := by rw [map₂_swap, map₂_left]
theorem map_map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (n : γ → δ) :
(map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ (fun a b => n (m a b)) f g := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, ← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_map]; rfl
theorem map₂_map_left (m : γ → β → δ) (n : α → γ) :
map₂ m (f.map n) g = map₂ (fun a b => m (n a) b) f g := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, ← map_prod_eq_map₂, ← @map_id _ g, prod_map_map_eq, map_map, map_id]; rfl
theorem map₂_map_right (m : α → γ → δ) (n : β → γ) :
map₂ m f (g.map n) = map₂ (fun a b => m a (n b)) f g := by
rw [map₂_swap, map₂_map_left, map₂_swap]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_curry (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map₂ m.curry f g = (f ×ˢ g).map m :=
(map_prod_eq_map₂' _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem map_uncurry_prod (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
(f ×ˢ g).map (uncurry m) = map₂ m f g :=
(map₂_curry (uncurry m) f g).symm
/-!
### Algebraic replacement rules
A collection of lemmas to transfer associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of operations
to the associativity, commutativity, distributivity, ... of `Filter.map₂` of those operations.
The proof pattern is `map₂_lemma operation_lemma`. For example, `map₂_comm mul_comm` proves that
`map₂ (*) f g = map₂ (*) g f` in a `CommSemigroup`.
-/
theorem map₂_assoc {m : δ → γ → ε} {n : α → β → δ} {m' : α → ε' → ε} {n' : β → γ → ε'}
{h : Filter γ} (h_assoc : ∀ a b c, m (n a b) c = m' a (n' b c)) :
map₂ m (map₂ n f g) h = map₂ m' f (map₂ n' g h) := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂ n, ← map_prod_eq_map₂ n', map₂_map_left, map₂_map_right,
← map_prod_eq_map₂, ← map_prod_eq_map₂, ← prod_assoc, map_map]
simp only [h_assoc, Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem map₂_comm {n : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, m a b = n b a) : map₂ m f g = map₂ n g f :=
(map₂_swap _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [h_comm]
theorem map₂_left_comm {m : α → δ → ε} {n : β → γ → δ} {m' : α → γ → δ'} {n' : β → δ' → ε}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, m a (n b c) = n' b (m' a c)) :
map₂ m f (map₂ n g h) = map₂ n' g (map₂ m' f h) := by
rw [map₂_swap m', map₂_swap m]
exact map₂_assoc fun _ _ _ => h_left_comm _ _ _
theorem map₂_right_comm {m : δ → γ → ε} {n : α → β → δ} {m' : α → γ → δ'} {n' : δ' → β → ε}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b c, m (n a b) c = n' (m' a c) b) :
map₂ m (map₂ n f g) h = map₂ n' (map₂ m' f h) g := by
rw [map₂_swap n, map₂_swap n']
exact map₂_assoc fun _ _ _ => h_right_comm _ _ _
theorem map_map₂_distrib {n : γ → δ} {m' : α' → β' → δ} {n₁ : α → α'} {n₂ : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, n (m a b) = m' (n₁ a) (n₂ b)) :
(map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ m' (f.map n₁) (g.map n₂) := by
simp_rw [map_map₂, map₂_map_left, map₂_map_right, h_distrib]
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map₂_map_left_comm`. -/
theorem map_map₂_distrib_left {n : γ → δ} {m' : α' → β → δ} {n' : α → α'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, n (m a b) = m' (n' a) b) : (map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ m' (f.map n') g :=
map_map₂_distrib h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map_map₂_right_comm`. -/
theorem map_map₂_distrib_right {n : γ → δ} {m' : α → β' → δ} {n' : β → β'}
(h_distrib : ∀ a b, n (m a b) = m' a (n' b)) : (map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ m' f (g.map n') :=
map_map₂_distrib h_distrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map_map₂_distrib_left`. -/
theorem map₂_map_left_comm {m : α' → β → γ} {n : α → α'} {m' : α → β → δ} {n' : δ → γ}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b, m (n a) b = n' (m' a b)) : map₂ m (f.map n) g = (map₂ m' f g).map n' :=
(map_map₂_distrib_left fun a b => (h_left_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map_map₂_distrib_right`. -/
theorem map_map₂_right_comm {m : α → β' → γ} {n : β → β'} {m' : α → β → δ} {n' : δ → γ}
(h_right_comm : ∀ a b, m a (n b) = n' (m' a b)) : map₂ m f (g.map n) = (map₂ m' f g).map n' :=
(map_map₂_distrib_right fun a b => (h_right_comm a b).symm).symm
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `f-f` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem map₂_distrib_le_left {m : α → δ → ε} {n : β → γ → δ} {m₁ : α → β → β'} {m₂ : α → γ → γ'}
{n' : β' → γ' → ε} (h_distrib : ∀ a b c, m a (n b c) = n' (m₁ a b) (m₂ a c)) :
map₂ m f (map₂ n g h) ≤ map₂ n' (map₂ m₁ f g) (map₂ m₂ f h) := by
rintro s ⟨t₁, ⟨u₁, hu₁, v, hv, ht₁⟩, t₂, ⟨u₂, hu₂, w, hw, ht₂⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u₁ ∩ u₂, inter_mem hu₁ hu₂, _, image2_mem_map₂ hv hw, ?_⟩
refine (image2_distrib_subset_left h_distrib).trans ((image2_subset ?_ ?_).trans hs)
· exact (image2_subset_right inter_subset_left).trans ht₁
· exact (image2_subset_right inter_subset_right).trans ht₂
/-- The other direction does not hold because of the `h`-`h` cross terms on the RHS. -/
theorem map₂_distrib_le_right {m : δ → γ → ε} {n : α → β → δ} {m₁ : α → γ → α'} {m₂ : β → γ → β'}
{n' : α' → β' → ε} (h_distrib : ∀ a b c, m (n a b) c = n' (m₁ a c) (m₂ b c)) :
map₂ m (map₂ n f g) h ≤ map₂ n' (map₂ m₁ f h) (map₂ m₂ g h) := by
rintro s ⟨t₁, ⟨u, hu, w₁, hw₁, ht₁⟩, t₂, ⟨v, hv, w₂, hw₂, ht₂⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨_, image2_mem_map₂ hu hv, w₁ ∩ w₂, inter_mem hw₁ hw₂, ?_⟩
refine (image2_distrib_subset_right h_distrib).trans ((image2_subset ?_ ?_).trans hs)
· exact (image2_subset_left inter_subset_left).trans ht₁
· exact (image2_subset_left inter_subset_right).trans ht₂
theorem map_map₂_antidistrib {n : γ → δ} {m' : β' → α' → δ} {n₁ : β → β'} {n₂ : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, n (m a b) = m' (n₁ b) (n₂ a)) :
(map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ m' (g.map n₁) (f.map n₂) := by
rw [map₂_swap m]
exact map_map₂_distrib fun _ _ => h_antidistrib _ _
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map₂_map_left_anticomm`. -/
theorem map_map₂_antidistrib_left {n : γ → δ} {m' : β' → α → δ} {n' : β → β'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, n (m a b) = m' (n' b) a) : (map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ m' (g.map n') f :=
map_map₂_antidistrib h_antidistrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map_map₂_right_anticomm`. -/
theorem map_map₂_antidistrib_right {n : γ → δ} {m' : β → α' → δ} {n' : α → α'}
(h_antidistrib : ∀ a b, n (m a b) = m' b (n' a)) : (map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ m' g (f.map n') :=
map_map₂_antidistrib h_antidistrib
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map_map₂_antidistrib_left`. -/
theorem map₂_map_left_anticomm {m : α' → β → γ} {n : α → α'} {m' : β → α → δ} {n' : δ → γ}
(h_left_anticomm : ∀ a b, m (n a) b = n' (m' b a)) :
map₂ m (f.map n) g = (map₂ m' g f).map n' :=
(map_map₂_antidistrib_left fun a b => (h_left_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- Symmetric statement to `Filter.map_map₂_antidistrib_right`. -/
theorem map_map₂_right_anticomm {m : α → β' → γ} {n : β → β'} {m' : β → α → δ} {n' : δ → γ}
(h_right_anticomm : ∀ a b, m a (n b) = n' (m' b a)) :
map₂ m f (g.map n) = (map₂ m' g f).map n' :=
(map_map₂_antidistrib_right fun a b => (h_right_anticomm b a).symm).symm
/-- If `a` is a left identity for `f : α → β → β`, then `pure a` is a left identity for
`Filter.map₂ f`. -/
theorem map₂_left_identity {f : α → β → β} {a : α} (h : ∀ b, f a b = b) (l : Filter β) :
map₂ f (pure a) l = l := by rw [map₂_pure_left, show f a = id from funext h, map_id]
/-- If `b` is a right identity for `f : α → β → α`, then `pure b` is a right identity for
`Filter.map₂ f`. -/
theorem map₂_right_identity {f : α → β → α} {b : β} (h : ∀ a, f a b = a) (l : Filter α) :
map₂ f l (pure b) = l := by rw [map₂_pure_right, funext h, map_id']
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/NAry.lean | 317 | 318 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
/-!
# One-dimensional iterated derivatives
We define the `n`-th derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` as a function
`iteratedDeriv n f : 𝕜 → F`, as well as a version on domains `iteratedDerivWithin n f s : 𝕜 → F`,
and prove their basic properties.
## Main definitions and results
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field, and `F` a normed vector space over `𝕜`. Let `f : 𝕜 → F`.
* `iteratedDeriv n f` is the `n`-th derivative of `f`, seen as a function from `𝕜` to `F`.
It is defined as the `n`-th Fréchet derivative (which is a multilinear map) applied to the
vector `(1, ..., 1)`, to take advantage of all the existing framework, but we show that it
coincides with the naive iterative definition.
* `iteratedDeriv_eq_iterate` states that the `n`-th derivative of `f` is obtained by starting
from `f` and differentiating it `n` times.
* `iteratedDerivWithin n f s` is the `n`-th derivative of `f` within the domain `s`. It only
behaves well when `s` has the unique derivative property.
* `iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate` states that the `n`-th derivative of `f` in the domain `s` is
obtained by starting from `f` and differentiating it `n` times within `s`. This only holds when
`s` has the unique derivative property.
## Implementation details
The results are deduced from the corresponding results for the more general (multilinear) iterated
Fréchet derivative. For this, we write `iteratedDeriv n f` as the composition of
`iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f` and a continuous linear equiv. As continuous linear equivs respect
differentiability and commute with differentiation, this makes it possible to prove readily that
the derivative of the `n`-th derivative is the `n+1`-th derivative in `iteratedDerivWithin_succ`,
by translating the corresponding result `iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left` for the
iterated Fréchet derivative.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology
open Filter Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative of a function from `𝕜` to `F`, as a function from `𝕜` to `F`. -/
def iteratedDeriv (n : ℕ) (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) : F :=
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative of a function from `𝕜` to `F` within a set `s`, as a function
from `𝕜` to `F`. -/
def iteratedDerivWithin (n : ℕ) (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) : F :=
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1
variable {n : ℕ} {f : 𝕜 → F} {s : Set 𝕜} {x : 𝕜}
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_univ : iteratedDerivWithin n f univ = iteratedDeriv n f := by
ext x
rw [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedDeriv, iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
/-! ### Properties of the iterated derivative within a set -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin : iteratedDerivWithin n f s x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1 :=
rfl
/-- Write the iterated derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the iterated
Fréchet derivative -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedDerivWithin n f s =
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F).symm ∘ iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s := by
ext x; rfl
/-- Write the iterated Fréchet derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the
iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s =
ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F ∘ iteratedDerivWithin n f s := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, ← Function.comp_assoc, LinearIsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm,
Function.id_comp]
/-- The `n`-th Fréchet derivative applied to a vector `(m 0, ..., m (n-1))` is the derivative
multiplied by the product of the `m i`s. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_apply_eq_iteratedDerivWithin_mul_prod {m : Fin n → 𝕜} :
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) m =
(∏ i, m i) • iteratedDerivWithin n f s x := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin, ← ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_smul_univ]
simp
theorem norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_norm_iteratedDerivWithin :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x‖ = ‖iteratedDerivWithin n f s x‖ := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_zero : iteratedDerivWithin 0 f s = f := by
ext x
simp [iteratedDerivWithin]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_one {x : 𝕜} :
iteratedDerivWithin 1 f s x = derivWithin f s x := by
by_cases hsx : AccPt x (𝓟 s)
· simp only [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin_one_apply hsx.uniqueDiffWithinAt,
derivWithin]
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt hsx, iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt hsx]
/-- If the first `n` derivatives within a set of a function are continuous, and its first `n-1`
derivatives are differentiable, then the function is `C^n`. This is not an equivalence in general,
but this is an equivalence when the set has unique derivatives, see
`contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞}
(Hcont : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedDerivWithin m f s x) s)
(Hdiff : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedDerivWithin m f s x) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
apply contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn
· simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff]
· simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
/-- To check that a function is `n` times continuously differentiable, it suffices to check that its
first `n` derivatives are differentiable. This is slightly too strong as the condition we
require on the `n`-th derivative is differentiability instead of continuity, but it has the
advantage of avoiding the discussion of continuity in the proof (and for `n = ∞` this is optimal).
-/
theorem contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞}
(h : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
apply contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn
simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
/-- On a set with unique derivatives, a `C^n` function has derivatives up to `n` which are
continuous. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_iteratedDerivWithin
{n : WithTop ℕ∞} {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : m ≤ n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) : ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
simpa only [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff] using
h.continuousOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hmn hs
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {m : ℕ}
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (insert x s)) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s x := by
simpa only [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff] using
h.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedFDerivWithin hmn hs
/-- On a set with unique derivatives, a `C^n` function has derivatives less than `n` which are
differentiable. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn_iteratedDerivWithin {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {m : ℕ}
(h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin hmn <| by rwa [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative on sets with unique derivatives. -/
theorem contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ (∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
simp only [contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn hs, iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative on sets with unique derivatives. -/
theorem contDiffOn_nat_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ (∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, m < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
rw [show n = ((n : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞) from rfl,
contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv hs]
simp
| /-- The `n+1`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
differentiating the `n`-th iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_succ {x : 𝕜} :
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x = derivWithin (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x := by
by_cases hxs : AccPt x (𝓟 s)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/IteratedDeriv/Defs.lean | 175 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Big operators and `Fin`
Some results about products and sums over the type `Fin`.
The most important results are the induction formulas `Fin.prod_univ_castSucc`
and `Fin.prod_univ_succ`, and the formula `Fin.prod_const` for the product of a
constant function. These results have variants for sums instead of products.
## Main declarations
* `finFunctionFinEquiv`: An explicit equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i = ∏ i : Fin n, f i :=
(Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range _ _).symm
end Finset
namespace Fin
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn (f : Fin n → M) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def (f : Fin n → M) : ∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `1` because `Fin 0` is empty -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero (f : Fin 0 → M) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` times the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove n x, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map, coe_succAboveEmb]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f 0` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succ (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_getElem (l : List M) : ∏ i : Fin l.length, l[i.1] = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get := sum_univ_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get := prod_univ_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_fun_getElem (l : List α) (f : α → M) :
∏ i : Fin l.length, f l[i.1] = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get' := sum_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get' := prod_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → M) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_snoc (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (snoc f x : Fin n.succ → M) i) = (∏ i : Fin n, f i) * x := by
simp [prod_univ_castSucc]
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one (f : Fin 1 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two (f : Fin 2 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' (f : α → M) (a b : α) : ∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three (f : Fin 3 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four (f : Fin 4 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five (f : Fin 5 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_six (f : Fin 6 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_five]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_seven (f : Fin 7 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_six]
rfl
| @[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_eight (f : Fin 8 → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 * f 7 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_seven]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 151 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ : ℝ) {r₂ : ℝ} (hr₂ : r₂ ≠ 0) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_ball_zero_iff,
map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r₁]
refine mul_lt_mul' hb ha (norm_nonneg _) (hr₂.lt_or_lt.resolve_left ?_)
exact ((apply_nonneg p b).trans hb).not_lt
theorem ball_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.ball (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
rcases eq_or_ne r₂ 0 with rfl | hr₂
· simp
· exact (smul_subset_smul_left (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _)).trans
(ball_smul_closedBall _ _ hr₂)
theorem closedBall_smul_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.closedBall 0 r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_closedBall_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
intro a ha b hb
gcongr
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans ha
theorem neg_mem_ball_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ x ∈ ball p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_ball_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
theorem neg_mem_closedBall_zero {r : ℝ} {x : E} : -x ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ x ∈ closedBall p 0 r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall_zero, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) : -ball p x r = ball p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_ball, mem_ball, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
@[simp]
theorem neg_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
-closedBall p x r = closedBall p (-x) r := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_neg, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, ← neg_add', sub_neg_eq_add, map_neg_eq_map]
end Module
end AddCommGroup
end SeminormedRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r : ℝ} {x : E}
theorem closedBall_iSup {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) (e : E)
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (⨆ i, p i) e r = ⋂ i, closedBall (p i) e r := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iSup_of_empty', iInter_of_empty, Seminorm.sSup_empty]
exact closedBall_bot _ hr
· ext x
have := Seminorm.bddAbove_range_iff.mp hp (x - e)
simp only [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter, Seminorm.iSup_apply hp, ciSup_le_iff this]
theorem ball_norm_mul_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) ⊆ k • p.ball 0 r := by
rcases eq_or_ne k 0 with (rfl | hk)
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, ball_eq_emptyset _ le_rfl]
exact empty_subset _
· intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_ball_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ←
mul_lt_mul_left <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk, ← mul_assoc, ← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖,
div_self (ne_of_gt <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self hk, one_smul]
theorem smul_ball_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
k • p.ball 0 r = p.ball 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
ext
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hk, p.mem_ball_zero, p.mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul,
norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.2 hk), mul_comm]
theorem smul_closedBall_subset {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} :
k • p.closedBall 0 r ⊆ p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, ← h, map_smul_eq_mul]
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
gcongr
theorem smul_closedBall_zero {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {k : 𝕜} {r : ℝ} (hk : 0 < ‖k‖) :
k • p.closedBall 0 r = p.closedBall 0 (‖k‖ * r) := by
refine subset_antisymm smul_closedBall_subset ?_
intro x
rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero]
refine fun hx => ⟨k⁻¹ • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Seminorm.mem_closedBall_zero, map_smul_eq_mul, norm_inv, ← mul_le_mul_left hk, ← mul_assoc,
← div_eq_mul_inv ‖k‖ ‖k‖, div_self (ne_of_gt hk), one_mul]
rw [← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_self (norm_pos_iff.mp hk), one_smul]
theorem ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 < r₁) :
Absorbs 𝕜 (p.ball 0 r₁) (p.ball 0 r₂) := by
rcases exists_pos_lt_mul hr₁ r₂ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
refine .of_norm ⟨r, fun a ha x hx => ?_⟩
rw [smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr₀.trans_le ha), p.mem_ball_zero]
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hx
exact hx.trans (hr.trans_le <| by gcongr)
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p (0 : E) r) :=
absorbent_iff_forall_absorbs_singleton.2 fun _ =>
(p.ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr).mono_right <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 <| p.mem_ball_zero.2 <| lt_add_one _
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall_zero (hr : 0 < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p (0 : E) r) :=
(p.absorbent_ball_zero hr).mono (p.ball_subset_closedBall _ _)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_ball (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (ball p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_ball_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_ball_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_ball.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_of_lt_sub_right hy)
/-- Seminorm-balls containing the origin are absorbent. -/
protected theorem absorbent_closedBall (hpr : p x < r) : Absorbent 𝕜 (closedBall p x r) := by
refine (p.absorbent_closedBall_zero <| sub_pos.2 hpr).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [p.mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
exact p.mem_closedBall.2 ((map_sub_le_add p _ _).trans <| add_le_of_le_sub_right hy)
@[simp]
theorem smul_ball_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.ball y r = p.ball (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_ball, mem_ball, lt_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem smul_closedBall_preimage (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (y : E) (r : ℝ) (a : 𝕜) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • ·) ⁻¹' p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (a⁻¹ • y) (r / ‖a‖) :=
Set.ext fun _ => by
rw [mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr ha), mul_comm, ←
map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ ha]
end NormedField
section Convex
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E]
section SMul
variable [SMul ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- A seminorm is convex. Also see `convexOn_norm`. -/
protected theorem convexOn : ConvexOn ℝ univ p := by
refine ⟨convex_univ, fun x _ y _ a b ha hb _ => ?_⟩
calc
p (a • x + b • y) ≤ p (a • x) + p (b • y) := map_add_le_add p _ _
| _ = ‖a • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p x + ‖b • (1 : 𝕜)‖ * p y := by
rw [← map_smul_eq_mul p, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, smul_one_smul, smul_one_smul]
_ = a * p x + b * p y := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_smul, norm_one, mul_one, mul_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg ha,
Real.norm_of_nonneg hb]
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 985 | 996 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
| rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 411 | 417 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
section NthRoots
/-- `nthRoots n a` noncomputably returns the solutions to `x ^ n = a`. -/
def nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset R :=
roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRoots {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a x : R} : x ∈ nthRoots n a ↔ x ^ n = a := by
rw [nthRoots, mem_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a), IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_pow,
eval_X, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero (r : R) : nthRoots 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [empty_eq_zero, pow_zero, nthRoots, ← C_1, ← C_sub, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero_right {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (n : ℕ) :
nthRoots n (0 : R) = Multiset.replicate n 0 := by
rw [nthRoots, C.map_zero, sub_zero, roots_pow, roots_X, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
theorem card_nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset.card (nthRoots n a) ≤ n := by
classical exact
(if hn : n = 0 then
if h : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a = 0 then by
simp [Nat.zero_le, nthRoots, roots, h, dif_pos rfl, empty_eq_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots h)
(by
rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_sub]
exact degree_C_le))
else by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)]
rw [← degree_X_pow_sub_C (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a]
exact card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a))
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_two_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : nthRoots 2 r = 0 ↔ ¬IsSquare r := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_nthRoots (by norm_num : 0 < 2),
← not_exists, eq_comm]
/-- The multiset `nthRoots ↑n a` as a Finset. Previously `nthRootsFinset n` was defined to be
`nthRoots n (1 : R)` as a Finset. That situation can be recovered by setting `a` to be `(1 : R)` -/
def nthRootsFinset (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : Finset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a)
lemma nthRootsFinset_def (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] :
nthRootsFinset n a = Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a) := by
unfold nthRootsFinset
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRootsFinset {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (a : R) {x : R} :
x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a ↔ x ^ (n : ℕ) = a := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset_def, mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots h]
@[simp]
theorem nthRootsFinset_zero (a : R) : nthRootsFinset 0 a = ∅ := by
classical simp [nthRootsFinset_def]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[MonoidHomClass F R S] {a : R} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n (f a) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn] at hx
· rw [mem_nthRootsFinset <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn, ← map_pow, (mem_nthRootsFinset
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a).1 hx]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset_one {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[RingHomClass F R S] {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1 := by
rw [← (map_one f)]
exact map_mem_nthRootsFinset hx _
theorem mul_mem_nthRootsFinset
{η₁ η₂ : R} {a₁ a₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₁) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₂) :
η₁ * η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (a₁ * a₂) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη₁
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos] at hη₁ hη₂ ⊢
rw [mul_pow, hη₁, hη₂]
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_nthRootsFinset {η : R} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hη : η ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) :
η ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
rintro rfl
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos, zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at hη
exact ha hη.symm
theorem one_mem_nthRootsFinset (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R) := by
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset hn, one_pow]
end NthRoots
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
variable [CommRing T]
/-- Given a polynomial `p` with coefficients in a ring `T` and a `T`-algebra `S`, `aroots p S` is
the multiset of roots of `p` regarded as a polynomial over `S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, roots_C_mul]
rwa [map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
@[simp]
theorem aroots_smul_nonzero [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (p : T[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a • p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, aroots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).aroots S = n • p.aroots S := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_pow, roots_pow]
theorem aroots_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_pow, aroots_X]
theorem aroots_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(C a * X ^ n : T[X]).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [aroots_C_mul _ ha, aroots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {a : T} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n a).aroots S = n • ({0} : Multiset S) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, aroots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
variable (R S) in
@[simp]
theorem aroots_map (p : T[X]) [CommRing S] [Algebra T S] [Algebra S R] [Algebra T R]
[IsScalarTower T S R] :
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).aroots R = p.aroots R := by
rw [aroots_def, aroots_def, map_map, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq T S R]
/-- The set of distinct roots of `p` in `S`.
|
If you have a non-separable polynomial, use `Polynomial.aroots` for the multiset
where multiple roots have the appropriate multiplicity. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 483 | 485 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Dart
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Fintype
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Set
/-!
# Maps between graphs
This file defines two functions and three structures relating graphs.
The structures directly correspond to the classification of functions as
injective, surjective and bijective, and have corresponding notation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.map`: the graph obtained by pushing the adjacency relation through
an injective function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.comap`: the graph obtained by pulling the adjacency relation behind
an arbitrary function between vertex types.
* `SimpleGraph.induce`: the subgraph induced by the given vertex set, a wrapper around `comap`.
* `SimpleGraph.spanningCoe`: the supergraph without any additional edges, a wrapper around `map`.
* `SimpleGraph.Hom`, `G →g H`: a graph homomorphism from `G` to `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Embedding`, `G ↪g H`: a graph embedding of `G` in `H`.
* `SimpleGraph.Iso`, `G ≃g H`: a graph isomorphism between `G` and `H`.
Note that a graph embedding is a stronger notion than an injective graph homomorphism,
since its image is an induced subgraph.
## Implementation notes
Morphisms of graphs are abbreviations for `RelHom`, `RelEmbedding` and `RelIso`.
To make use of pre-existing simp lemmas, definitions involving morphisms are
abbreviations as well.
-/
open Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V W X : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) {u v : V}
/-! ## Map and comap -/
/-- Given an injective function, there is a covariant induced map on graphs by pushing forward
the adjacency relation.
This is injective (see `SimpleGraph.map_injective`). -/
protected def map (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : SimpleGraph W where
Adj := Relation.Map G.Adj f f
symm a b := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, rfl⟩
use w, v, h.symm, rfl
loopless a := by -- Porting note: `obviously` used to handle this
rintro ⟨v, w, h, rfl, h'⟩
exact h.ne (f.injective h'.symm)
instance instDecidableMapAdj {f : V ↪ W} {a b} [Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)] :
Decidable ((G.map f).Adj a b) := ‹Decidable (Relation.Map G.Adj f f a b)›
@[simp]
theorem map_adj (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (u v : W) :
(G.map f).Adj u v ↔ ∃ u' v' : V, G.Adj u' v' ∧ f u' = u ∧ f v' = v :=
Iff.rfl
lemma map_adj_apply {G : SimpleGraph V} {f : V ↪ W} {a b : V} :
(G.map f).Adj (f a) (f b) ↔ G.Adj a b := by simp
theorem map_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.map f) := by
rintro G G' h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, h ha, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id : G.map (Function.Embedding.refl _) = G :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_id_id _
@[simp] lemma map_map (f : V ↪ W) (g : W ↪ X) : (G.map f).map g = G.map (f.trans g) :=
SimpleGraph.ext <| Relation.map_map _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given a function, there is a contravariant induced map on graphs by pulling back the
adjacency relation.
This is one of the ways of creating induced graphs. See `SimpleGraph.induce` for a wrapper.
This is surjective when `f` is injective (see `SimpleGraph.comap_surjective`). -/
protected def comap (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj u v := G.Adj (f u) (f v)
symm _ _ h := h.symm
loopless _ := G.loopless _
@[simp] lemma comap_adj {G : SimpleGraph W} {f : V → W} :
(G.comap f).Adj u v ↔ G.Adj (f u) (f v) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id {G : SimpleGraph V} : G.comap id = G := SimpleGraph.ext rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_comap {G : SimpleGraph X} (f : V → W) (g : W → X) :
(G.comap g).comap f = G.comap (g ∘ f) := rfl
instance instDecidableComapAdj (f : V → W) (G : SimpleGraph W) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidableRel (G.comap f).Adj := fun _ _ ↦ ‹DecidableRel G.Adj› _ _
lemma comap_symm (G : SimpleGraph V) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.comap e.symm.toEmbedding = G.map e.toEmbedding := by
ext; simp only [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, comap_adj, map_adj, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply,
exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right]
lemma map_symm (G : SimpleGraph W) (e : V ≃ W) :
G.map e.symm.toEmbedding = G.comap e.toEmbedding := by rw [← comap_symm, e.symm_symm]
theorem comap_monotone (f : V ↪ W) : Monotone (SimpleGraph.comap f) := by
intro G G' h _ _ ha
exact h ha
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_eq (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) : (G.map f).comap f = G := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_comap_map (f : V ↪ W) :
Function.LeftInverse (SimpleGraph.comap f) (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
comap_map_eq f
theorem map_injective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Injective (SimpleGraph.map f) :=
(leftInverse_comap_map f).injective
theorem comap_surjective (f : V ↪ W) : Function.Surjective (SimpleGraph.comap f) :=
(leftInverse_comap_map f).surjective
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph W) :
G.map f ≤ G' ↔ G ≤ G'.comap f :=
⟨fun h _ _ ha => h ⟨_, _, ha, rfl, rfl⟩, by
rintro h _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact h ha⟩
theorem map_comap_le (f : V ↪ W) (G : SimpleGraph W) : (G.comap f).map f ≤ G := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]
lemma le_comap_of_subsingleton (f : V → W) [Subsingleton V] : G ≤ G'.comap f := by
intros v w; simp [Subsingleton.elim v w]
lemma map_le_of_subsingleton (f : V ↪ W) [Subsingleton V] : G.map f ≤ G' := by
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap]; apply le_comap_of_subsingleton
/-- Given a family of vertex types indexed by `ι`, pulling back from `⊤ : SimpleGraph ι`
yields the complete multipartite graph on the family.
Two vertices are adjacent if and only if their indices are not equal. -/
abbrev completeMultipartiteGraph {ι : Type*} (V : ι → Type*) : SimpleGraph (Σ i, V i) :=
SimpleGraph.comap Sigma.fst ⊤
/-- Equivalent types have equivalent simple graphs. -/
@[simps apply]
protected def _root_.Equiv.simpleGraph (e : V ≃ W) : SimpleGraph V ≃ SimpleGraph W where
toFun := SimpleGraph.comap e.symm
invFun := SimpleGraph.comap e
left_inv _ := by simp
| right_inv _ := by simp
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Maps.lean | 158 | 159 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Nilpotent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Normalizer
/-!
# Engel's theorem
This file contains a proof of Engel's theorem providing necessary and sufficient conditions for Lie
algebras and Lie modules to be nilpotent.
The key result `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_forall` says that if `M` is a Lie module of a
Noetherian Lie algebra `L`, then `M` is nilpotent iff the image of `L → End(M)` consists of
nilpotent elements. In the special case that we have the adjoint representation `M = L`, this says
that a Lie algebra is nilpotent iff `ad x : End(L)` is nilpotent for all `x : L`.
Engel's theorem is true for any coefficients (i.e., it is really a theorem about Lie rings) and so
we work with coefficients in any commutative ring `R` throughout.
On the other hand, Engel's theorem is not true for infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and so a
finite-dimensionality assumption is required. We prove the theorem subject to the assumption
that the Lie algebra is Noetherian as an `R`-module, though actually we only need the slightly
weaker property that the relation `>` is well-founded on the complete lattice of Lie subalgebras.
## Remarks about the proof
Engel's theorem is usually proved in the special case that the coefficients are a field, and uses
an inductive argument on the dimension of the Lie algebra. One begins by choosing either a maximal
proper Lie subalgebra (in some proofs) or a maximal nilpotent Lie subalgebra (in other proofs, at
the cost of obtaining a weaker end result).
Since we work with general coefficients, we cannot induct on dimension and an alternate approach
must be taken. The key ingredient is the concept of nilpotency, not just for Lie algebras, but for
Lie modules. Using this concept, we define an _Engelian Lie algebra_ `LieAlgebra.IsEngelian` to
be one for which a Lie module is nilpotent whenever the action consists of nilpotent endomorphisms.
The argument then proceeds by selecting a maximal Engelian Lie subalgebra and showing that it cannot
be proper.
The first part of the traditional statement of Engel's theorem consists of the statement that if `M`
is a non-trivial `R`-module and `L ⊆ End(M)` is a finite-dimensional Lie subalgebra of nilpotent
elements, then there exists a non-zero element `m : M` that is annihilated by every element of `L`.
This follows trivially from the result established here `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_forall`, that
`M` is a nilpotent Lie module over `L`, since the last non-zero term in the lower central series
will consist of such elements `m` (see: `LieModule.nontrivial_max_triv_of_isNilpotent`). It seems
that this result has not previously been established at this level of generality.
The second part of the traditional statement of Engel's theorem concerns nilpotency of the Lie
algebra and a proof of this for general coefficients appeared in the literature as long ago
[as 1937](zorn1937). This also follows trivially from `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_forall` simply by
taking `M = L`.
It is pleasing that the two parts of the traditional statements of Engel's theorem are thus unified
into a single statement about nilpotency of Lie modules. This is not usually emphasised.
## Main definitions
* `LieAlgebra.IsEngelian`
* `LieAlgebra.isEngelian_of_isNoetherian`
* `LieModule.isNilpotent_iff_forall`
* `LieAlgebra.isNilpotent_iff_forall`
-/
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable {R : Type u₁} {L : Type u₂} {L₂ : Type u₃} {M : Type u₄}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [LieRing L₂] [LieAlgebra R L₂]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
namespace LieSubmodule
open LieModule
variable {I : LieIdeal R L} {x : L} (hxI : (R ∙ x) ⊔ I = ⊤)
include hxI
theorem exists_smul_add_of_span_sup_eq_top (y : L) : ∃ t : R, ∃ z ∈ I, y = t • x + z := by
have hy : y ∈ (⊤ : Submodule R L) := Submodule.mem_top
simp only [← hxI, Submodule.mem_sup, Submodule.mem_span_singleton] at hy
obtain ⟨-, ⟨t, rfl⟩, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hy
exact ⟨t, z, hz, rfl⟩
theorem lie_top_eq_of_span_sup_eq_top (N : LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑⁅(⊤ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ : Submodule R M) =
| (N : Submodule R M).map (toEnd R L M x) ⊔ (↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) := by
simp only [lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', Submodule.sup_span, mem_top, exists_prop,
true_and, Submodule.map_coe, toEnd_apply_apply]
refine le_antisymm (Submodule.span_le.mpr ?_) (Submodule.span_mono fun z hz => ?_)
· rintro z ⟨y, n, hn : n ∈ N, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨t, z, hz, rfl⟩ := exists_smul_add_of_span_sup_eq_top hxI y
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.span_union, Submodule.mem_sup]
exact
⟨t • ⁅x, n⁆, Submodule.subset_span ⟨t • n, N.smul_mem' t hn, lie_smul t x n⟩, ⁅z, n⁆,
Submodule.subset_span ⟨z, hz, n, hn, rfl⟩, by simp⟩
· rcases hz with (⟨m, hm, rfl⟩ | ⟨y, -, m, hm, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨x, m, hm, rfl⟩, ⟨y, m, hm, rfl⟩]
theorem lcs_le_lcs_of_is_nilpotent_span_sup_eq_top {n i j : ℕ}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Engel.lean | 89 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConvergenceInMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
/-!
# Uniform integrability
This file contains the definitions for uniform integrability (both in the measure theory sense
as well as the probability theory sense). This file also contains the Vitali convergence theorem
which establishes a relation between uniform integrability, convergence in measure and
Lp convergence.
Uniform integrability plays a vital role in the theory of martingales most notably is used to
formulate the martingale convergence theorem.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of functions `f` is uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there
exists some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` of smaller measure than `δ`, the Lp-norm of
`f i` restricted `s` is smaller than `ε` for all `i`.
* `MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the probability theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of measurable functions `f` is uniformly integrable in the
probability theory sense if it is uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and
has uniformly bounded Lp-norm.
# Main results
* `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite`: a finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly
integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae`: a sequence of Lp functions which is uniformly
integrable converges in Lp if they converge almost everywhere.
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp_finite`: Vitali convergence theorem:
a sequence of Lp functions converges in Lp if and only if it is uniformly integrable
and converges in measure.
## Tags
uniform integrable, uniformly absolutely continuous integral, Vitali convergence theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
A sequence of functions `f` is said to be uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there exists
some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` with measure less than `δ`, the Lp-norm of `f i`
restricted on `s` is less than `ε`.
Uniform integrability is also known as uniformly absolutely continuous integrals. -/
def UnifIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃ε : ℝ⦄ (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ i s,
MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → eLpNorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε
/-- In probability theory, a family of measurable functions is uniformly integrable if it is
uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and is uniformly bounded. -/
def UniformIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
(∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ∧ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ i, eLpNorm (f i) p μ ≤ C
namespace UniformIntegrable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ)
(i : ι) : AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ :=
hf.1 i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias aeStronglyMeasurable := UniformIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem unifIntegrable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ :=
hf.2.1
protected theorem memLp {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) (i : ι) :
MemLp (f i) p μ :=
⟨hf.1 i,
let ⟨_, _, hC⟩ := hf.2
lt_of_le_of_lt (hC i) ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
end UniformIntegrable
section UnifIntegrable
/-! ### `UnifIntegrable`
This section deals with uniform integrability in the measure theory sense. -/
namespace UnifIntegrable
variable {f g : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
protected theorem add (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f + g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
have hε2 : 0 < ε / 2 := half_pos hε
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁_pos, hfδ₁⟩ := hf hε2
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂_pos, hgδ₂⟩ := hg hε2
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁_pos hδ₂_pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_add']
refine (eLpNorm_add_le ((hf_meas i).indicator hs) ((hg_meas i).indicator hs) hp).trans ?_
have hε_halves : ENNReal.ofReal ε = ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add hε2.le hε2.le, add_halves]
rw [hε_halves]
exact add_le_add (hfδ₁ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_left _ _))))
(hgδ₂ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_right _ _))))
protected theorem neg (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) : UnifIntegrable (-f) p μ := by
simp_rw [UnifIntegrable, Pi.neg_apply, Set.indicator_neg', eLpNorm_neg]
exact hf
protected theorem sub (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f - g) p μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg hp hf_meas fun i => (hg_meas i).neg
protected theorem ae_eq (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable g p μ := by
classical
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hfδ⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun n s hs hμs => (le_of_eq <| eLpNorm_congr_ae ?_).trans (hfδ n s hs hμs)⟩
filter_upwards [hfg n] with x hx
simp_rw [Set.indicator_apply, hx]
/-- Uniform integrability is preserved by restriction of the functions to a set. -/
protected theorem indicator (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (E : Set α) :
UnifIntegrable (fun i => E.indicator (f i)) p μ := fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hε⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun i s hs hμs ↦ ?_⟩
calc
eLpNorm (s.indicator (E.indicator (f i))) p μ
= eLpNorm (E.indicator (s.indicator (f i))) p μ := by
simp only [indicator_indicator, inter_comm]
_ ≤ eLpNorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ := eLpNorm_indicator_le _
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := hε _ _ hs hμs
/-- Uniform integrability is preserved by restriction of the measure to a set. -/
protected theorem restrict (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (E : Set α) :
UnifIntegrable f p (μ.restrict E) := fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hδε⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun i s hs hμs ↦ ?_⟩
rw [μ.restrict_apply hs, ← measure_toMeasurable] at hμs
calc
eLpNorm (indicator s (f i)) p (μ.restrict E) = eLpNorm (f i) p (μ.restrict (s ∩ E)) := by
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs, μ.restrict_restrict hs]
_ ≤ eLpNorm (f i) p (μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ E))) :=
eLpNorm_mono_measure _ <| Measure.restrict_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _) le_rfl
_ = eLpNorm (indicator (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ E)) (f i)) p μ :=
(eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)).symm
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := hδε i _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) hμs
end UnifIntegrable
theorem unifIntegrable_zero_meas [MeasurableSpace α] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : ι → α → β} :
UnifIntegrable f p (0 : Measure α) :=
fun ε _ => ⟨1, one_pos, fun i s _ _ => by simp⟩
theorem unifIntegrable_congr_ae {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f g : ι → α → β} (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔ UnifIntegrable g p μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.ae_eq hfg, fun hg => hg.ae_eq fun n => (hfg n).symm⟩
theorem tendsto_indicator_ge (f : α → β) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const (i₀ := Nat.ceil (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ) + 1) fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
simp only [not_le, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_ceil _) ?_
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) ?_
norm_cast
variable {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- This lemma is weaker than `MeasureTheory.MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
as the latter provides `0 ≤ M` and does not require the measurability of `f`. -/
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : MemLp f 1 μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have htendsto :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
univ_mem' (id fun x => tendsto_indicator_ge f x)
have hmeas : ∀ M : ℕ, AEStronglyMeasurable ({ x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ := by
intro M
apply hf.1.indicator
apply StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_le stronglyMeasurable_const
hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.stronglyMeasurable
have hbound : HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ := by
rw [memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf
exact hf.norm.2
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖{ x | n ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f a - 0‖ ∂μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence hmeas hbound ?_ htendsto
refine fun n => univ_mem' (id fun x => ?_)
by_cases hx : (n : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖
· dsimp
rwa [Set.indicator_of_mem]
· dsimp
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, norm_zero]
· exact norm_nonneg _
· assumption
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at this
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := this (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (ENNReal.ofReal_pos.2 hε)
simp only [zero_tsub, zero_le, sub_zero, zero_add, coe_nnnorm,
Set.mem_Icc] at hM
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
convert hM M le_rfl
simp only [coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal (norm_nonneg _)]
rfl
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MeasureTheory.MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
which does not require measurability. -/
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas (hf : MemLp f 1 μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε :=
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
⟨max M 0, le_max_right _ _, by simpa⟩
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le (hf : MemLp f 1 μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hf_mk : MemLp (hf.1.mk f) 1 μ := (memLp_congr_ae hf.1.ae_eq_mk).mp hf
obtain ⟨M, hM_pos, hfM⟩ :=
hf_mk.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk hε
refine ⟨M, hM_pos, (le_of_eq ?_).trans hfM⟩
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simp only [Set.indicator_apply, coe_nnnorm, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ENNReal.coe_inj, hx.symm]
theorem MemLp.eLpNormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero (hf : MemLp f ∞ μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∃ M : ℝ, eLpNormEssSup ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ = 0 := by
have hbdd : eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ := hf.eLpNorm_lt_top
refine ⟨(eLpNorm f ∞ μ + 1).toReal, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNormEssSup_indicator_eq_eLpNormEssSup_restrict]
· have : μ.restrict { x : α | (eLpNorm f ⊤ μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖₊ } = 0 := by
simp only [coe_nnnorm, eLpNorm_exponent_top, Measure.restrict_eq_zero]
have : { x : α | (eLpNormEssSup f μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖ } ⊆
{ x : α | eLpNormEssSup f μ < ‖f x‖₊ } := by
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne ENNReal.coe_lt_top.ne,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hx
rw [ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne]
· exact ENNReal.lt_add_right hbdd.ne one_ne_zero
· exact (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hbdd, ENNReal.one_lt_top⟩).ne
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine (measure_mono this).trans ?_
have hle := enorm_ae_le_eLpNormEssSup f μ
simp_rw [ae_iff, not_le] at hle
exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.2 hle
rw [this, eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe
/- This lemma is slightly weaker than `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le` as the
latter provides `0 < M`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ M : ℝ, eLpNorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hp_ne_zero : p = 0
· refine ⟨1, hp_ne_zero.symm ▸ ?_⟩
simp [eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_ne_top : p = ∞
· subst hp_ne_top
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero hmeas
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
simp only [eLpNorm_exponent_top, hM, zero_le]
obtain ⟨M, hM', hM⟩ := MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le
(μ := μ) (hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top) (Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hε p.toReal)
refine ⟨M ^ (1 / p.toReal), ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_one (ENNReal.ofReal ε)]
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul,
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top),
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos hε]
convert hM using 3 with x
rw [enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm]
have hiff : M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ ↔ M ≤ ‖‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal‖₊ := by
rw [coe_nnnorm, coe_nnnorm, Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), norm_norm,
← Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff hM' (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
(one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top), ← Real.rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _),
mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm, Real.rpow_one]
by_cases hx : x ∈ { x : α | M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem, Real.enorm_of_nonneg (by positivity),
← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm]
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
· simp [ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
· rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
/-- This lemma implies that a single function is uniformly integrable (in the probability sense). -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 < M ∧ eLpNorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
refine
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), le_trans (eLpNorm_mono fun x => ?_) hM⟩
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
refine Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (fun x hx => ?_) (fun x => norm_nonneg (f x)) x
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx -- removing the `rw` breaks the proof!
exact (max_le_iff.1 hx).1
end
theorem eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_bound {f : α → β} (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {M : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ < M) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s →
μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hM : M ≤ 0
· refine ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ _ => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = 0)]
· simp [hε.le]
· ext x
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
exact (lt_of_lt_of_le (hf x) hM).le
rw [not_le] at hM
refine ⟨(ε / M) ^ p.toReal, Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (div_pos hε hM) _, fun s hs hμ => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
have haebdd : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ M := by
filter_upwards
exact fun x => (hf x).le
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound haebdd) ?_
rw [Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl _) (Or.inl ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top)]
· rw [ENNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top)]
refine le_trans hμ ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos (div_pos hε hM),
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top), ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos hM]
· simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, Ne]
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le' (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ 2 * ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hMpos, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le hmeas hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ :=
eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_bound (f := { x | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f) hp_top hε (by
intro x
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, Set.indicator_apply]
· split_ifs with h
exacts [h, hMpos])
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = { x : α | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f + { x : α | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f)]
· rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_add_le ?_ ?_ hp_one) ?_
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe))
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_lt hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe measurable_const))
· rw [two_mul]
refine add_le_add (le_trans (eLpNorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self) hM) ?_
rw [← eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
exact hδ s hs hμs
· ext x
by_cases hx : M ≤ ‖f x‖
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, add_zero] <;> simpa
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, Set.indicator_of_mem, zero_add] <;>
simpa using hx
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le` which does not require
measurability on `f`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_meas (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_le' hp_one hp_top hmeas (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => le_trans (hδ s hs hμs) ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos zero_lt_two, (by norm_num : ENNReal.ofReal 2 = 2),
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel] <;>
norm_num
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hℒp := hf
obtain ⟨⟨f', hf', heq⟩, _⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hℒp.ae_eq heq).eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_meas hp_one hp_top hf' hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs using 1
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs, eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
exact eLpNorm_congr_ae heq.restrict
/-- A constant function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_const {g : α → β} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
UnifIntegrable (fun _ : ι => g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hgδ⟩ := hg.eLpNorm_indicator_le hp hp_ne_top hε
exact ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun _ => hgδ⟩
/-- A single function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
by_cases hι : Nonempty ι
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := hι
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hf i).eLpNorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun j s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun i => False.elim <| hι <| Nonempty.intro i⟩
/-- This lemma is less general than `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite` which applies to
all sequences indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_fin (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
revert f
induction' n with n h
· intro f hf
exact unifIntegrable_subsingleton hp_one hp_top hf
intro f hfLp ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := fun k => f k
have hgLp : ∀ i, MemLp (g i) p μ := fun i => hfLp i
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁pos, hδ₁⟩ := h hgLp hε
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂pos, hδ₂⟩ := (hfLp n).eLpNorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁pos hδ₂pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hi : i.val < n
· rw [(_ : f i = g ⟨i.val, hi⟩)]
· exact hδ₁ _ s hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_left _ _)
· simp [g]
· rw [(_ : i = n)]
· exact hδ₂ _ hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_right _ _)
· have hi' := Fin.is_lt i
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hi'
rw [not_lt] at hi
simp [← le_antisymm hi' hi]
/-- A finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_finite [Finite ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin ι
intro ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := f ∘ hn.some.symm
have hg : ∀ i, MemLp (g i) p μ := fun _ => hf _
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp_one hp_top hg hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
specialize hδ (hn.some i) s hs hμs
simp_rw [g, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply] at hδ
assumption
end
theorem eLpNorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd (μ : Measure α)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
{f g : α → β} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ c) :
eLpNorm (s.indicator (f - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal c * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ x, ‖s.indicator (f - g) x‖ ≤ ‖s.indicator (fun _ => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Pi.sub_apply, ← dist_eq_norm,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
exact hf x hx
· simp [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_mono this) ?_
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_const hs hp hp']
refine mul_le_mul_right' (le_of_eq ?_) _
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hg' : MemLp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero]
intro ε hε
by_cases h : ε < ∞; swap
· rw [not_lt, top_le_iff] at h
exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [h]⟩
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [hμ]⟩
have hε' : 0 < ε.toReal / 3 := div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos hε.ne' h.ne) (by norm_num)
have hdivp : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := by positivity
have hpow : 0 < measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁, heLpNorm₁⟩ := hui hε'
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂, heLpNorm₂⟩ := hg'.eLpNorm_indicator_le hp hp' hε'
obtain ⟨t, htm, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto' hf hg hfg (lt_min hδ₁ hδ₂)
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff] at ht₂
specialize ht₂ (ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
(div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos (gt_iff_lt.1 hε).ne.symm h.ne) (mul_pos (by norm_num) hpow))
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.1 ht₂; clear ht₂
refine ⟨N, fun n hn => ?_⟩
rw [← t.indicator_self_add_compl (f n - g)]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_add_le (((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm.compl).aestronglyMeasurable hp) ?_
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, Set.indicator_add' t, Set.indicator_neg']
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (eLpNorm_add_le ((hf n).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(hg.indicator htm).neg.aestronglyMeasurable hp) _) ?_
have hnf : eLpNorm (t.indicator (f n)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine heLpNorm₁ n t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₁.le]
exact min_le_left _ _
have hng : eLpNorm (t.indicator g) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine heLpNorm₂ t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₂.le]
exact min_le_right _ _
have hlt : eLpNorm (tᶜ.indicator (f n - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
specialize hN n hn
have : 0 ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)) := by positivity
have := eLpNorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd μ hp' htm.compl this fun x hx =>
(dist_comm (g x) (f n x) ▸ (hN x hx).le :
dist (f n x) (g x) ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
refine le_trans this ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, ← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (measure_lt_top μ tᶜ).ne,
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg hdivp, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul, mul_assoc]
· refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (mul_le_of_le_one_right hε'.le ?_)
rw [mul_comm, mul_one_div, div_le_one]
· refine Real.rpow_le_rpow ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
(ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).le ?_) hdivp
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_measureUnivNNReal]
exact measure_mono (Set.subset_univ _)
· exact Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
· positivity
have : ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) = ε / 3 := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (show (0 : ℝ) < 3 by norm_num), ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h.ne]
simp
rw [this] at hnf hng hlt
rw [eLpNorm_neg, ← ENNReal.add_thirds ε, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_le_add_three hnf hng hlt
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ)
(hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ = eLpNorm ((hf n).mk (f n) - hg.1.mk g) p μ :=
fun n => eLpNorm_congr_ae ((hf n).ae_eq_mk.sub hg.1.ae_eq_mk)
simp_rw [this]
refine tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).stronglyMeasurable_mk)
hg.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk (hg.ae_eq hg.1.ae_eq_mk) (hui.ae_eq fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk) ?_
have h_ae_forall_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, f n x = (hf n).mk (f n) x := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk
filter_upwards [hfg, h_ae_forall_eq, hg.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx_tendsto hxf_eq hxg_eq
rw [← hxg_eq]
convert hx_tendsto using 1
ext1 n
exact (hxf_eq n).symm
variable {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp_zero (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0)) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at hf_tendsto
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hf_tendsto (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (by simpa)
let F : Fin N → α → β := fun n => f n
have hF : ∀ n, MemLp (F n) p μ := fun n => hf n
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδpos₁, hδ₁⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp hp' hF hε
refine ⟨δ₁, hδpos₁, fun n s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hn : n < N
· exact hδ₁ ⟨n, hn⟩ s hs hμs
· exact (eLpNorm_indicator_le _).trans (hN n (not_lt.1 hn))
/-- Convergence in Lp implies uniform integrability. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ)
(hg : MemLp g p μ) (hfg : Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0)) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
have : f = (fun _ => g) + fun n => f n - g := by ext1 n; simp
rw [this]
refine UnifIntegrable.add ?_ ?_ hp (fun _ => hg.aestronglyMeasurable)
fun n => (hf n).1.sub hg.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact unifIntegrable_const hp hp' hg
· exact unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp_zero hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).sub hg) hfg
/-- Forward direction of Vitali's convergence theorem: if `f` is a sequence of uniformly integrable
functions that converge in measure to some function `g` in a finite measure space, then `f`
converge in Lp to `g`. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendstoInMeasure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) : Tendsto (fun n ↦ eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_of_subseq_tendsto fun ns hns => ?_
obtain ⟨ms, _, hms'⟩ := TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae fun ε hε => (hfg ε hε).comp hns
exact ⟨ms,
tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae hp hp' (fun _ => hf _) hg (fun ε hε =>
let ⟨δ, hδ, hδ'⟩ := hui hε
⟨δ, hδ, fun i s hs hμs => hδ' _ s hs hμs⟩)
hms'⟩
/-- **Vitali's convergence theorem**: A sequence of functions `f` converges to `g` in Lp if and
only if it is uniformly integrable and converges to `g` in measure. -/
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp_finite [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun h => tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendstoInMeasure hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).1) hg h.2 h.1, fun h =>
⟨tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_eLpNorm (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp).ne.symm
(fun n => (hf n).aestronglyMeasurable) hg.aestronglyMeasurable h,
unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp hp hp' hf hg h⟩⟩
/-- This lemma is superseded by `unifIntegrable_of` which do not require `C` to be positive. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_of' (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i))
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ C : ℝ≥0, 0 < C ∧
∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
have hpzero := (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp).ne.symm
by_cases hμ : μ Set.univ = 0
· rw [Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
exact hμ.symm ▸ unifIntegrable_zero_meas
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨C, hCpos, hC⟩ := h (ε / 2) (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨(ε / (2 * C)) ^ ENNReal.toReal p,
Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (div_pos hε (mul_pos two_pos (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hCpos))) _,
fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hμs' : μ s = 0
· rw [(eLpNorm_eq_zero_iff ((hf i).indicator hs).aestronglyMeasurable hpzero).2
(indicator_meas_zero hμs')]
norm_num
| calc
eLpNorm (Set.indicator s (f i)) p μ ≤
eLpNorm (Set.indicator (s ∩ { x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }) (f i)) p μ +
eLpNorm (Set.indicator (s ∩ { x | ‖f i x‖₊ < C }) (f i)) p μ := by
refine le_trans (Eq.le ?_) (eLpNorm_add_le
(StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
((hf i).indicator (hs.inter (stronglyMeasurable_const.measurableSet_le (hf i).nnnorm))))
(StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
((hf i).indicator (hs.inter ((hf i).nnnorm.measurableSet_lt stronglyMeasurable_const))))
hp)
congr
change _ = fun x => (s ∩ { x : α | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }).indicator (f i) x +
(s ∩ { x : α | ‖f i x‖₊ < C }).indicator (f i) x
rw [← Set.indicator_union_of_disjoint]
· rw [← Set.inter_union_distrib_left, (by ext; simp [le_or_lt] :
{ x : α | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ } ∪ { x : α | ‖f i x‖₊ < C } = Set.univ),
Set.inter_univ]
· refine (Disjoint.inf_right' _ ?_).inf_left' _
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx₁ hx₂
exact False.elim (hx₂.ne (eq_of_le_of_not_lt hx₁ (not_lt.2 hx₂.le)).symm)
_ ≤ eLpNorm (Set.indicator { x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ } (f i)) p μ +
(C : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
refine add_le_add
(eLpNorm_mono fun x => norm_indicator_le_of_subset Set.inter_subset_right _ _) ?_
rw [← Set.indicator_indicator]
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖{ x : α | ‖f i x‖₊ < C }.indicator (f i) x‖ ≤ C := by
filter_upwards
simp_rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
exact Set.indicator_le' (fun x (hx : _ < _) => hx.le) fun _ _ => NNReal.coe_nonneg _
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound this) ?_
rw [mul_comm, Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.univ_inter, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, one_div]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + C * ENNReal.ofReal (ε / (2 * C)) := by
refine add_le_add (hC i) (mul_le_mul_left' ?_ _)
rwa [one_div, ENNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hpzero hp'),
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos (div_pos hε (mul_pos two_pos (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hCpos)))]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) := by
refine add_le_add_left ?_ _
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), ← div_div,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hCpos).ne.symm]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add (half_pos hε).le (half_pos hε).le, add_halves]
theorem unifIntegrable_of (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ)
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ C : ℝ≥0,
∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
set g : ι → α → β := fun i => (hf i).choose
refine
(unifIntegrable_of' hp hp' (fun i => (Exists.choose_spec <| hf i).1) fun ε hε => ?_).ae_eq
fun i => (Exists.choose_spec <| hf i).2.symm
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := h ε hε
have hCg : ∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖g i x‖₊ }.indicator (g i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
intro i
refine le_trans (le_of_eq <| eLpNorm_congr_ae ?_) (hC i)
filter_upwards [(Exists.choose_spec <| hf i).2] with x hx
by_cases hfx : x ∈ { x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hfx, Set.indicator_of_mem, hx]
rwa [Set.mem_setOf, hx] at hfx
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/UniformIntegrable.lean | 635 | 696 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.AEMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.EventuallyConst
/-!
# Measure preserving maps
We say that `f : α → β` is a measure preserving map w.r.t. measures `μ : Measure α` and
`ν : Measure β` if `f` is measurable and `map f μ = ν`. In this file we define the predicate
`MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving` and prove its basic properties.
We use the term "measure preserving" because in many applications `α = β` and `μ = ν`.
## References
Partially based on
[this](https://www.isa-afp.org/browser_info/current/AFP/Ergodic_Theory/Measure_Preserving_Transformations.html)
Isabelle formalization.
## Tags
measure preserving map, measure
-/
open MeasureTheory.Measure Function Set
open scoped ENNReal
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[MeasurableSpace δ]
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {μa : Measure α} {μb : Measure β} {μc : Measure γ} {μd : Measure δ}
/-- `f` is a measure preserving map w.r.t. measures `μa` and `μb` if `f` is measurable
and `map f μa = μb`. -/
structure MeasurePreserving (f : α → β)
(μa : Measure α := by volume_tac) (μb : Measure β := by volume_tac) : Prop where
protected measurable : Measurable f
protected map_eq : map f μa = μb
protected theorem _root_.Measurable.measurePreserving
{f : α → β} (h : Measurable f) (μa : Measure α) : MeasurePreserving f μa (map f μa) :=
⟨h, rfl⟩
namespace MeasurePreserving
protected theorem id (μ : Measure α) : MeasurePreserving id μ μ :=
⟨measurable_id, map_id⟩
protected theorem aemeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : MeasurePreserving f μa μb) : AEMeasurable f μa :=
hf.1.aemeasurable
@[nontriviality]
theorem of_isEmpty [IsEmpty β] (f : α → β) (μa : Measure α) (μb : Measure β) :
MeasurePreserving f μa μb :=
⟨measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain _, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
theorem symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {μa : Measure α} {μb : Measure β} (h : MeasurePreserving e μa μb) :
MeasurePreserving e.symm μb μa :=
⟨e.symm.measurable, by
rw [← h.map_eq, map_map e.symm.measurable e.measurable, e.symm_comp_self, map_id]⟩
theorem restrict_preimage {f : α → β} (hf : MeasurePreserving f μa μb) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : MeasurePreserving f (μa.restrict (f ⁻¹' s)) (μb.restrict s) :=
| ⟨hf.measurable, by rw [← hf.map_eq, restrict_map hf.measurable hs]⟩
theorem restrict_preimage_emb {f : α → β} (hf : MeasurePreserving f μa μb)
(h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding f) (s : Set β) :
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Ergodic/MeasurePreserving.lean | 70 | 73 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Aaron Anderson, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
/-!
# support of a permutation
## Main definitions
In the following, `f g : Equiv.Perm α`.
* `Equiv.Perm.Disjoint`: two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if every element is fixed
either by `f`, or by `g`.
Equivalently, `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` iff their `support` are disjoint.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsSwap`: `f = swap x y` for `x ≠ y`.
* `Equiv.Perm.support`: the elements `x : α` that are not fixed by `f`.
Assume `α` is a Fintype:
* `Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one f` says that `f` has
strictly less than `Fintype.card α - 1` fixed points, unless `f = 1`.
(Equivalently, `f.support` has at least 2 elements.)
-/
open Equiv Finset Function
namespace Equiv.Perm
variable {α : Type*}
section Disjoint
/-- Two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if their supports are disjoint, i.e.,
every element is fixed either by `f`, or by `g`. -/
def Disjoint (f g : Perm α) :=
∀ x, f x = x ∨ g x = x
variable {f g h : Perm α}
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm : Disjoint f g → Disjoint g f := by simp only [Disjoint, or_comm, imp_self]
theorem Disjoint.symmetric : Symmetric (@Disjoint α) := fun _ _ => Disjoint.symm
instance : IsSymm (Perm α) Disjoint :=
⟨Disjoint.symmetric⟩
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint f g ↔ Disjoint g f :=
⟨Disjoint.symm, Disjoint.symm⟩
theorem Disjoint.commute (h : Disjoint f g) : Commute f g :=
Equiv.ext fun x =>
(h x).elim
(fun hf =>
(h (g x)).elim (fun hg => by simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]) fun hg => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, g.injective hg])
fun hg =>
(h (f x)).elim (fun hf => by simp [mul_apply, f.injective hf, hg]) fun hf => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_left (f : Perm α) : Disjoint 1 f := fun _ => Or.inl rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_right (f : Perm α) : Disjoint f 1 := fun _ => Or.inr rfl
theorem disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq : Disjoint f g ↔ ∀ x : α, f x = x ∨ g x = x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_refl_iff : Disjoint f f ↔ f = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ disjoint_one_left 1⟩
ext x
rcases h x with hx | hx <;> simp [hx]
theorem Disjoint.inv_left (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f⁻¹ g := by
intro x
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, eq_comm]
exact h x
theorem Disjoint.inv_right (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f g⁻¹ :=
h.symm.inv_left.symm
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_left_iff : Disjoint f⁻¹ g ↔ Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.inv_left⟩
convert h.inv_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_right_iff : Disjoint f g⁻¹ ↔ Disjoint f g := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_inv_left_iff, disjoint_comm]
theorem Disjoint.mul_left (H1 : Disjoint f h) (H2 : Disjoint g h) : Disjoint (f * g) h := fun x =>
by cases H1 x <;> cases H2 x <;> simp [*]
theorem Disjoint.mul_right (H1 : Disjoint f g) (H2 : Disjoint f h) : Disjoint f (g * h) := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
exact H1.symm.mul_left H2.symm
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: make it `@[simp]`
theorem disjoint_conj (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) ↔ Disjoint f g :=
(h⁻¹).forall_congr fun {_} ↦ by simp only [mul_apply, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem Disjoint.conj (H : Disjoint f g) (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) :=
(disjoint_conj h).2 H
theorem disjoint_prod_right (l : List (Perm α)) (h : ∀ g ∈ l, Disjoint f g) :
Disjoint f l.prod := by
induction' l with g l ih
· exact disjoint_one_right _
· rw [List.prod_cons]
exact (h _ List.mem_cons_self).mul_right (ih fun g hg => h g (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg))
theorem disjoint_noncommProd_right {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j))
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, g.Disjoint (k i)) :
Disjoint g (s.noncommProd k (hs)) :=
noncommProd_induction s k hs g.Disjoint (fun _ _ ↦ Disjoint.mul_right) (disjoint_one_right g) hg
open scoped List in
theorem disjoint_prod_perm {l₁ l₂ : List (Perm α)} (hl : l₁.Pairwise Disjoint) (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.prod = l₂.prod :=
hp.prod_eq' <| hl.imp Disjoint.commute
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint {l : List (Perm α)} (h1 : (1 : Perm α) ∉ l)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup := by
refine List.Pairwise.imp_of_mem ?_ h2
intro τ σ h_mem _ h_disjoint _
subst τ
suffices (σ : Perm α) = 1 by
rw [this] at h_mem
exact h1 h_mem
exact ext fun a => or_self_iff.mp (h_disjoint a)
theorem pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, hfx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n]
theorem zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℤ, (f ^ n) x = x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx]
theorem pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x ∨ (f ^ n) x = f x
| 0 => Or.inl rfl
| n + 1 =>
(pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n).elim
(fun h => Or.inr (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h]))
fun h => Or.inl (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h, hffx])
theorem zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = x ∨ (f ^ i) x = f x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, ← f.injective.eq_iff, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ', eq_comm,
inv_eq_iff_eq, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ, @eq_comm _ x, or_comm]
exact pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx _
theorem Disjoint.mul_apply_eq_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) {a : α} :
(σ * τ) a = a ↔ σ a = a ∧ τ a = a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [mul_apply, h.2, h.1]⟩
rcases hστ a with hσ | hτ
· exact ⟨hσ, σ.injective (h.trans hσ.symm)⟩
· exact ⟨(congr_arg σ hτ).symm.trans h, hτ⟩
theorem Disjoint.mul_eq_one_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) :
σ * τ = 1 ↔ σ = 1 ∧ τ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, one_apply, hστ.mul_apply_eq_iff, forall_and]
theorem Disjoint.zpow_disjoint_zpow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℤ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) := fun x =>
Or.imp (fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h m)
(fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h n) (hστ x)
theorem Disjoint.pow_disjoint_pow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℕ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) :=
hστ.zpow_disjoint_zpow m n
end Disjoint
section IsSwap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- `f.IsSwap` indicates that the permutation `f` is a transposition of two elements. -/
def IsSwap (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ f = swap x y
@[simp]
theorem ofSubtype_swap_eq {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (x y : Subtype p) :
ofSubtype (Equiv.swap x y) = Equiv.swap ↑x ↑y :=
Equiv.ext fun z => by
by_cases hz : p z
· rw [swap_apply_def, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _ hz]
split_ifs with hzx hzy
· simp_rw [hzx, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_left]
· simp_rw [hzy, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_right]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
simp [Subtype.ext_iff, *]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _ hz, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop x
intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop y
theorem IsSwap.of_subtype_isSwap {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : Perm (Subtype p)}
(h : f.IsSwap) : (ofSubtype f).IsSwap :=
let ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩, hxy⟩ := h
⟨x, y, by
simp only [Ne, Subtype.ext_iff] at hxy
exact hxy.1, by
rw [hxy.2, ofSubtype_swap_eq]⟩
theorem ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self {f : Perm α} {x y : α} (hy : (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y) :
f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := by
simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, f.injective.eq_iff] at *
by_cases h : f y = x
· constructor <;> intro <;> simp_all only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne]
· split_ifs at hy with h <;> try { simp [*] at * }
end IsSwap
section support
section Set
variable (p q : Perm α)
theorem set_support_inv_eq : { x | p⁻¹ x ≠ x } = { x | p x ≠ x } := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [inv_def, symm_apply_eq, eq_comm]
theorem set_support_apply_mem {p : Perm α} {a : α} :
p a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } ↔ a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } := by simp
theorem set_support_zpow_subset (n : ℤ) : { x | (p ^ n) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
intro hx H
simp [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self H] at hx
theorem set_support_mul_subset : { x | (p * q) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } ∪ { x | q x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
by_cases hq : q x = x <;> simp [hq]
end Set
@[simp]
theorem apply_pow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_pow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem apply_zpow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℤ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_zpow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {f g : Perm α}
/-- The `Finset` of nonfixed points of a permutation. -/
def support (f : Perm α) : Finset α := {x | f x ≠ x}
@[simp]
theorem mem_support {x : α} : x ∈ f.support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [support, mem_filter, and_iff_right (mem_univ x)]
theorem not_mem_support {x : α} : x ∉ f.support ↔ f x = x := by simp
theorem coe_support_eq_set_support (f : Perm α) : (f.support : Set α) = { x | f x ≠ x } := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {σ : Perm α} : σ.support = ∅ ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, not_not,
Equiv.Perm.ext_iff, one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem support_one : (1 : Perm α).support = ∅ := by rw [support_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem support_refl : support (Equiv.refl α) = ∅ :=
support_one
theorem support_congr (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) (h' : ∀ x ∈ g.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ g.support
· exact h' x hx
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx, ← not_mem_support]
exact fun H => hx (h H)
/-- If g and c commute, then g stabilizes the support of c -/
theorem mem_support_iff_of_commute {g c : Perm α} (hgc : Commute g c) (x : α) :
x ∈ c.support ↔ g x ∈ c.support := by
simp only [mem_support, not_iff_not, ← mul_apply]
rw [← hgc, mul_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
theorem support_mul_le (f g : Perm α) : (f * g).support ≤ f.support ⊔ g.support := fun x => by
simp only [sup_eq_union]
rw [mem_union, mem_support, mem_support, mem_support, mul_apply, ← not_and_or, not_imp_not]
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
rw [hg, hf]
theorem exists_mem_support_of_mem_support_prod {l : List (Perm α)} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ l.prod.support) : ∃ f : Perm α, f ∈ l ∧ x ∈ f.support := by
contrapose! hx
simp_rw [mem_support, not_not] at hx ⊢
induction' l with f l ih
· rfl
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_apply, ih, hx]
· simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons, true_or]
intros f' hf'
refine hx f' ?_
simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons]
exact Or.inr hf'
theorem support_pow_le (σ : Perm α) (n : ℕ) : (σ ^ n).support ≤ σ.support := fun _ h1 =>
mem_support.mpr fun h2 => mem_support.mp h1 (pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h2 n)
@[simp]
theorem support_inv (σ : Perm α) : support σ⁻¹ = σ.support := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, not_iff_not, inv_eq_iff_eq.trans eq_comm, imp_true_iff]
theorem apply_mem_support {x : α} : f x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
rw [mem_support, mem_support, Ne, Ne, apply_eq_iff_eq]
/-- The support of a permutation is invariant -/
theorem isInvariant_of_support_le {c : Perm α} {s : Finset α} (hcs : c.support ≤ s) (x : α) :
x ∈ s ↔ c x ∈ s := by
by_cases hx' : x ∈ c.support
· simp only [hcs hx', true_iff, hcs (apply_mem_support.mpr hx')]
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx']
/-- A permutation c is the extension of a restriction of g to s
iff its support is contained in s and its restriction is that of g -/
lemma ofSubtype_eq_iff {g c : Equiv.Perm α} {s : Finset α}
(hg : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ g x ∈ s) :
ofSubtype (g.subtypePerm hg) = c ↔
c.support ≤ s ∧
∀ (hc' : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ c x ∈ s), c.subtypePerm hc' = g.subtypePerm hg := by
simp only [Equiv.ext_iff, subtypePerm_apply, Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.forall]
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· intro a ha
by_contra ha'
rw [mem_support, ← h a, ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha'] at ha
exact ha rfl
· intro _ a ha
rw [← h a, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, subtypePerm_apply]
· rintro ⟨hc, h⟩ a
specialize h (isInvariant_of_support_le hc)
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· rw [h a ha, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, subtypePerm_apply]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support]
exact Finset.not_mem_mono hc ha
theorem support_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (u : Perm (Subtype p)) :
(ofSubtype u).support = u.support.map (Function.Embedding.subtype p) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, Finset.mem_map, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.exists,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_iff_comm, not_exists, not_not]
by_cases hx : p x
· simp only [forall_prop_of_true hx, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem u hx, ← Subtype.coe_inj]
· simp only [forall_prop_of_false hx, true_iff, ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem u hx]
theorem mem_support_of_mem_noncommProd_support {α β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → Perm β}
{comm : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on f)} {x : β} (hx : x ∈ (s.noncommProd f comm).support) :
∃ a ∈ s, x ∈ (f a).support := by
contrapose! hx
classical
revert hx comm s
apply Finset.induction
· simp
· intro a s ha ih comm hs
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem s a f comm ha]
apply mt (Finset.mem_of_subset (support_mul_le _ _))
rw [Finset.sup_eq_union, Finset.not_mem_union]
exact ⟨hs a (s.mem_insert_self a), ih (fun a ha ↦ hs a (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha))⟩
theorem pow_apply_mem_support {n : ℕ} {x : α} : (f ^ n) x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, apply_pow_apply_eq_iff]
theorem zpow_apply_mem_support {n : ℤ} {x : α} : (f ^ n) x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, apply_zpow_apply_eq_iff]
theorem pow_eq_on_of_mem_support (h : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x) (k : ℕ) :
∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, (f ^ k) x = (g ^ k) x := by
induction' k with k hk
· simp
· intro x hx
rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, pow_succ, mul_apply, h _ hx, hk]
rwa [mem_inter, apply_mem_support, ← h _ hx, apply_mem_support, ← mem_inter]
theorem disjoint_iff_disjoint_support : Disjoint f g ↔ _root_.Disjoint f.support g.support := by
simp [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff, not_and_or,
imp_iff_not_or]
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_support (h : Disjoint f g) : _root_.Disjoint f.support g.support :=
disjoint_iff_disjoint_support.1 h
theorem Disjoint.support_mul (h : Disjoint f g) : (f * g).support = f.support ∪ g.support := by
refine le_antisymm (support_mul_le _ _) fun a => ?_
rw [mem_union, mem_support, mem_support, mem_support, mul_apply, ← not_and_or, not_imp_not]
exact
(h a).elim (fun hf h => ⟨hf, f.apply_eq_iff_eq.mp (h.trans hf.symm)⟩) fun hg h =>
⟨(congr_arg f hg).symm.trans h, hg⟩
theorem support_prod_of_pairwise_disjoint (l : List (Perm α)) (h : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
l.prod.support = (l.map support).foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ := by
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp
· rw [List.pairwise_cons] at h
have : Disjoint hd tl.prod := disjoint_prod_right _ h.left
simp [this.support_mul, hl h.right]
theorem support_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j)) :
(s.noncommProd k (hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute))).support =
s.biUnion fun i ↦ (k i).support := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.biUnion_insert]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.support_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem support_prod_le (l : List (Perm α)) : l.prod.support ≤ (l.map support).foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ := by
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp
· rw [List.prod_cons, List.map_cons, List.foldr_cons]
refine (support_mul_le hd tl.prod).trans ?_
exact sup_le_sup le_rfl hl
theorem support_zpow_le (σ : Perm α) (n : ℤ) : (σ ^ n).support ≤ σ.support := fun _ h1 =>
mem_support.mpr fun h2 => mem_support.mp h1 (zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h2 n)
@[simp]
theorem support_swap {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : support (swap x y) = {x, y} := by
ext z
by_cases hx : z = x
any_goals simpa [hx] using h.symm
by_cases hy : z = y
· simpa [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, hx, hy] using h
· simp [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, hx, hy]
theorem support_swap_iff (x y : α) : support (swap x y) = {x, y} ↔ x ≠ y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => support_swap h⟩
rintro rfl
simp [Finset.ext_iff] at h
theorem support_swap_mul_swap {x y z : α} (h : List.Nodup [x, y, z]) :
support (swap x y * swap y z) = {x, y, z} := by
simp only [List.not_mem_nil, and_true, List.mem_cons, not_false_iff, List.nodup_cons,
List.mem_singleton, and_self_iff, List.nodup_nil] at h
push_neg at h
apply le_antisymm
· convert support_mul_le (swap x y) (swap y z) using 1
rw [support_swap h.left.left, support_swap h.right.left]
simp [Finset.ext_iff]
· intro
simp only [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl | _) <;>
simp [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, h.left.left, h.left.left.symm, h.left.right.symm,
h.left.right.left.symm, h.right.left.symm]
theorem support_swap_mul_ge_support_diff (f : Perm α) (x y : α) :
f.support \ {x, y} ≤ (swap x y * f).support := by
intro
simp only [and_imp, Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne, mem_support, mem_insert, mem_sdiff,
mem_singleton]
push_neg
rintro ha ⟨hx, hy⟩ H
rw [swap_apply_eq_iff, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx hy] at H
exact ha H
theorem support_swap_mul_eq (f : Perm α) (x : α) (h : f (f x) ≠ x) :
(swap x (f x) * f).support = f.support \ {x} := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· simp [hx, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, not_mem_support.mpr hx, erase_eq_of_not_mem]
ext z
by_cases hzx : z = x
· simp [hzx]
by_cases hzf : z = f x
· simp [hzf, hx, h, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
by_cases hzfx : f z = x
· simp [Ne.symm hzx, hzx, Ne.symm hzf, hzfx]
· simp [Ne.symm hzx, hzx, Ne.symm hzf, hzfx, f.injective.ne hzx, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
theorem mem_support_swap_mul_imp_mem_support_ne {x y : α} (hy : y ∈ support (swap x (f x) * f)) :
y ∈ support f ∧ y ≠ x := by
simp only [mem_support, swap_apply_def, mul_apply, f.injective.eq_iff] at *
by_cases h : f y = x
· constructor <;> intro <;> simp_all only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne]
· split_ifs at hy with heq
· subst heq; exact ⟨h, hy⟩
· exact ⟨hy, heq⟩
theorem Disjoint.mem_imp (h : Disjoint f g) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ f.support) : x ∉ g.support :=
disjoint_left.mp h.disjoint_support hx
theorem eq_on_support_mem_disjoint {l : List (Perm α)} (h : f ∈ l) (hl : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = l.prod x := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp at h
· intro x hx
rw [List.pairwise_cons] at hl
rw [List.mem_cons] at h
rcases h with (rfl | h)
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_apply,
not_mem_support.mp ((disjoint_prod_right tl hl.left).mem_imp hx)]
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_apply, ← IH h hl.right _ hx, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support]
refine (hl.left _ h).symm.mem_imp ?_
simpa using hx
theorem Disjoint.mono {x y : Perm α} (h : Disjoint f g) (hf : x.support ≤ f.support)
(hg : y.support ≤ g.support) : Disjoint x y := by
rw [disjoint_iff_disjoint_support] at h ⊢
exact h.mono hf hg
theorem support_le_prod_of_mem {l : List (Perm α)} (h : f ∈ l) (hl : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
f.support ≤ l.prod.support := by
intro x hx
rwa [mem_support, ← eq_on_support_mem_disjoint h hl _ hx, ← mem_support]
section ExtendDomain
variable {β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β] {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
@[simp]
theorem support_extend_domain (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
support (g.extendDomain f) = g.support.map f.asEmbedding := by
ext b
simp only [exists_prop, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, toEmbedding_apply, mem_map, Ne,
Function.Embedding.trans_apply, mem_support]
by_cases pb : p b
· rw [extendDomain_apply_subtype _ _ pb]
constructor
· rintro h
refine ⟨f.symm ⟨b, pb⟩, ?_, by simp⟩
contrapose! h
simp [h]
· rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
contrapose! ha
obtain rfl : a = f.symm ⟨b, pb⟩ := by
rw [eq_symm_apply]
exact Subtype.coe_injective hb
rw [eq_symm_apply]
exact Subtype.coe_injective ha
· rw [extendDomain_apply_not_subtype _ _ pb]
simp only [not_exists, false_iff, not_and, eq_self_iff_true, not_true]
rintro a _ rfl
exact pb (Subtype.prop _)
theorem card_support_extend_domain (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
#(g.extendDomain f).support = #g.support := by simp
end ExtendDomain
section Card
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : Perm α} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 1 := by
rw [Finset.card_eq_zero, support_eq_empty_iff]
theorem one_lt_card_support_of_ne_one {f : Perm α} (h : f ≠ 1) : 1 < #f.support := by
simp_rw [one_lt_card_iff, mem_support, ← not_or]
contrapose! h
ext a
specialize h (f a) a
rwa [apply_eq_iff_eq, or_self_iff, or_self_iff] at h
theorem card_support_ne_one (f : Perm α) : #f.support ≠ 1 := by
by_cases h : f = 1
· exact ne_of_eq_of_ne (card_support_eq_zero.mpr h) zero_ne_one
· exact ne_of_gt (one_lt_card_support_of_ne_one h)
@[simp]
theorem card_support_le_one {f : Perm α} : #f.support ≤ 1 ↔ f = 1 := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, card_support_eq_zero, or_iff_not_imp_right,
imp_iff_right f.card_support_ne_one]
theorem two_le_card_support_of_ne_one {f : Perm α} (h : f ≠ 1) : 2 ≤ #f.support :=
one_lt_card_support_of_ne_one h
theorem card_support_swap_mul {f : Perm α} {x : α} (hx : f x ≠ x) :
#(swap x (f x) * f).support < #f.support :=
Finset.card_lt_card
⟨fun _ hz => (mem_support_swap_mul_imp_mem_support_ne hz).left, fun h =>
absurd (h (mem_support.2 hx)) (mt mem_support.1 (by simp))⟩
theorem card_support_swap {x y : α} (hxy : x ≠ y) : #(swap x y).support = 2 :=
show #(swap x y).support = #⟨x ::ₘ y ::ₘ 0, by simp [hxy]⟩ from
congr_arg card <| by simp [support_swap hxy, *, Finset.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem card_support_eq_two {f : Perm α} : #f.support = 2 ↔ IsSwap f := by
constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨x, t, hmem, hins, ht⟩ := card_eq_succ.1 h
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := card_eq_one.1 ht
rw [mem_singleton] at hmem
refine ⟨x, y, hmem, ?_⟩
ext a
have key : ∀ b, f b ≠ b ↔ _ := fun b => by rw [← mem_support, ← hins, mem_insert, mem_singleton]
by_cases ha : f a = a
· have ha' := not_or.mp (mt (key a).mpr (not_not.mpr ha))
rw [ha, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne ha'.1 ha'.2]
· have ha' := (key (f a)).mp (mt f.apply_eq_iff_eq.mp ha)
obtain rfl | rfl := (key a).mp ha
· rw [Or.resolve_left ha' ha, swap_apply_left]
· rw [Or.resolve_right ha' ha, swap_apply_right]
· obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ := h
exact card_support_swap hxy
theorem Disjoint.card_support_mul (h : Disjoint f g) :
#(f * g).support = #f.support + #g.support := by
rw [← Finset.card_union_of_disjoint]
· congr
ext
simp [h.support_mul]
| · simpa using h.disjoint_support
theorem card_support_prod_list_of_pairwise_disjoint {l : List (Perm α)} (h : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
#l.prod.support = (l.map (card ∘ support)).sum := by
induction' l with a t ih
· exact card_support_eq_zero.mpr rfl
· obtain ⟨ha, ht⟩ := List.pairwise_cons.1 h
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Support.lean | 640 | 646 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Field
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Hom
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps.Proper.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
Finally, `f : α → β` is called *locally Lipschitz continuous* if each `x : α` has a neighbourhood
on which `f` is Lipschitz continuous (with some constant).
In this file we specialize various facts about Lipschitz continuous maps
to the case of (pseudo) metric spaces.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis Ideal
universe u v w x
open Filter Function Set Topology NNReal ENNReal Bornology
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{f : α → β} : LipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y := by
simp only [LipschitzWith, edist_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.dist_le_mul, LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0}
{s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y := by
simp only [LipschitzOnWith, edist_nndist, dist_nndist]
norm_cast
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.dist_le_mul, LipschitzOnWith.of_dist_le_mul⟩ :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul
namespace LipschitzWith
section Metric
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [PseudoMetricSpace γ] {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β}
{x y : α} {r : ℝ}
protected theorem of_dist_le' {K : ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f :=
of_dist_le_mul fun x y =>
le_trans (h x y) <| by gcongr; apply Real.le_coe_toNNReal
protected theorem mk_one (h : ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
of_dist_le_mul <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul] using h
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
doesn't assume `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ) (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f :=
have I : ∀ x y, f x - f y ≤ K * dist x y := fun x y => sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 (h x y)
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨I x y, dist_comm y x ▸ I y x⟩
/-- For functions to `ℝ`, it suffices to prove `f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y`; this version
assumes `0≤K`. -/
protected theorem of_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} (K : ℝ≥0) (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y) :
LipschitzWith K f := by simpa only [Real.toNNReal_coe] using LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul' K h
protected theorem of_le_add {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + dist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul 1 <| by simpa only [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
protected theorem le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y) :
f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <| le_trans (le_abs_self _) <| h.dist_le_mul x y
protected theorem iff_le_add_mul {f : α → ℝ} {K : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith K f ↔ ∀ x y, f x ≤ f y + K * dist x y :=
| ⟨LipschitzWith.le_add_mul, LipschitzWith.of_le_add_mul K⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Lipschitz.lean | 94 | 95 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
/-!
# A Fubini theorem for categorical (co)limits
We prove that $lim_{J × K} G = lim_J (lim_K G(j, -))$ for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
when all the appropriate limits exist.
We begin working with a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`. We'll write `G : J × K ⥤ C` for the associated
"uncurried" functor.
In the first part, given a coherent family `D` of limit cones over the functors `F.obj j`,
and a cone `c` over `G`, we construct a cone over the cone points of `D`.
We then show that if `c` is a limit cone, the constructed cone is also a limit cone.
In the second part, we state the Fubini theorem in the setting where limits are
provided by suitable `HasLimit` classes.
We construct
`limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim)`
and give simp lemmas characterising it.
For convenience, we also provide
`limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G : limit G ≅ limit ((curry.obj G) ⋙ lim)`
in terms of the uncurried functor.
All statements have their counterpart for colimits.
-/
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type*} [Category J] [Category K]
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C) (G : J × K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCones where
/-- For each object, a cone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cocones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCocones where
/-- For each object, a cocone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cocones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cocone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCocones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `F.obj j`, and a cone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `curry.obj G j`, and a cone over `G`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeCurry {D : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G)} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone G) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app j := (Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π := { app k := c.π.app (j, k) } }
naturality {_ j'} _ := (Q j').hom_ext (by simp) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones over the `F.obj j`, and a cocone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cocone over the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones under the `curry.obj G j`, and a cocone under `G`,
we can construct a cocone under the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeCurry {D : DiagramOfCocones (curry.obj G)} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone G) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app j := (Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι := { app k := c.ι.app (j, k) } }
naturality {j _} _ := (Q j).hom_ext (by simp) }
/-- `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone when `c` is a limit cone.
-/
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
/-- If `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone then `c` is in fact a limit cone.
-/
def IsLimit.ofConeOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c)) : IsLimit c :=
-- These constructions are used in various fields of the proof so we abstract them here.
letI E (j : J) : Prod.sectR j K ⋙ uncurry.obj F ≅ F.obj j :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
letI S (s : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints :=
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app j := (Q j).lift <|
(Cones.postcompose (E j).hom).obj <| s.whisker (Prod.sectR j K)
naturality {j' j} f := (Q j).hom_ext <|
fun k ↦ by simpa [E] using s.π.naturality ((Prod.sectL J k).map f) } }
{ lift s := P.lift (S s)
fac s p := by
have h1 := (Q p.1).fac ((Cones.postcompose (E p.1).hom).obj <|
s.whisker (Prod.sectR p.1 K)) p.2
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Cones.postcompose_obj_pt, Cone.whisker_pt, Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Cone.whisker_π, NatTrans.comp_app, Functor.const_obj_obj, whiskerLeft_app,
NatIso.ofComponents_hom_app, Iso.refl_hom, Category.comp_id, E] at h1
have h2 := (P.fac (S s) p.1)
dsimp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Functor.const_obj_obj, DiagramOfCones.conePoints_obj, DiagramOfCones.conePoints_map,
Functor.const_obj_map, id_eq, Cones.postcompose_obj_pt, Cone.whisker_pt,
Cones.postcompose_obj_π, Cone.whisker_π, NatTrans.comp_app, whiskerLeft_app,
NatIso.ofComponents_hom_app, Iso.refl_hom, Prod.sectL_obj, Prod.sectL_map, eq_mp_eq_cast,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, coneOfConeUncurry_pt, coneOfConeUncurry_π_app, S, E] at h2 ⊢
simp [← h1, ← h2]
uniq s f hf := P.uniq (s := S s) _ <|
fun j ↦ (Q j).hom_ext <| fun k ↦ by simpa [S, E] using hf (j, k) }
/-- `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone when `c` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
/-- If `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone then `c` is in fact a colimit
cocone. -/
def IsColimit.ofCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F}
(Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j)) {c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)}
(P : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c)) : IsColimit c :=
-- These constructions are used in various fields of the proof so we abstract them here.
letI E (j : J) : (Prod.sectR j K ⋙ uncurry.obj F ≅ F.obj j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
letI S (s : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints :=
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app j := (Q j).desc <|
(Cocones.precompose (E j).inv).obj <| s.whisker (Prod.sectR j K)
naturality {j j'} f := (Q j).hom_ext <|
fun k ↦ by simpa [E] using s.ι.naturality ((Prod.sectL J k).map f) } }
{ desc s := P.desc (S s)
fac s p := by
have h1 := (Q p.1).fac ((Cocones.precompose (E p.1).inv).obj <|
s.whisker (Prod.sectR p.1 K)) p.2
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocone.whisker_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj,
Cocones.precompose_obj_ι, Cocone.whisker_ι, NatTrans.comp_app, NatIso.ofComponents_inv_app,
Iso.refl_inv, whiskerLeft_app, Category.id_comp, E] at h1
have h2 := (P.fac (S s) p.1)
dsimp only [DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj,
uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app, Functor.const_obj_obj, DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints_map,
Functor.const_obj_map, id_eq, Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocone.whisker_pt,
Cocones.precompose_obj_ι, Cocone.whisker_ι, NatTrans.comp_app, NatIso.ofComponents_inv_app,
Iso.refl_inv, whiskerLeft_app, Prod.sectL_obj, Prod.sectL_map, eq_mp_eq_cast,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, coconeOfCoconeUncurry_pt, coconeOfCoconeUncurry_ι_app, S, E] at h2 ⊢
simp [← h1, ← h2]
uniq s f hf := P.uniq (s := S s) _ <|
fun j ↦ (Q j).hom_ext <| fun k ↦ by simpa [S, E] using hf (j, k) }
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed limits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the limit cone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
|
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 346 | 351 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.QuasiIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
/-!
# Functors which preserves homology
If `F : C ⥤ D` is a functor between categories with zero morphisms, we shall
say that `F` preserves homology when `F` preserves both kernels and cokernels.
This typeclass is named `[F.PreservesHomology]`, and is automatically
satisfied when `F` preserves both finite limits and finite colimits.
If `S : ShortComplex C` and `[F.PreservesHomology]`, then there is an
isomorphism `S.mapHomologyIso F : (S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology`, which
is part of the natural isomorphism `homologyFunctorIso F` between the functors
`F.mapShortComplex ⋙ homologyFunctor D` and `homologyFunctor C ⋙ F`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
namespace Functor
variable (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A functor preserves homology when it preserves both kernels and cokernels. -/
class PreservesHomology (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves kernels -/
preservesKernels ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) : PreservesLimit (parallelPair f 0) F := by
infer_instance
/-- the functor preserves cokernels -/
preservesCokernels ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) : PreservesColimit (parallelPair f 0) F := by
infer_instance
variable [PreservesZeroMorphisms F]
/-- A functor which preserves homology preserves kernels. -/
lemma PreservesHomology.preservesKernel [F.PreservesHomology] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
PreservesLimit (parallelPair f 0) F :=
PreservesHomology.preservesKernels _
/-- A functor which preserves homology preserves cokernels. -/
lemma PreservesHomology.preservesCokernel [F.PreservesHomology] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
PreservesColimit (parallelPair f 0) F :=
PreservesHomology.preservesCokernels _
noncomputable instance preservesHomologyOfExact
[PreservesFiniteLimits F] [PreservesFiniteColimits F] :
F.PreservesHomology where
end Functor
namespace ShortComplex
variable {S S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable (h : S.LeftHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A left homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F` is
`F` preserves the kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃` and the cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
class IsPreservedBy [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves the kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
g : PreservesLimit (parallelPair S.g 0) F
/-- the functor preserves the cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
f' : PreservesColimit (parallelPair h.f' 0) F
variable [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
noncomputable instance isPreservedBy_of_preservesHomology [F.PreservesHomology] :
h.IsPreservedBy F where
g := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesKernel _ _
f' := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesCokernel _ _
variable [h.IsPreservedBy F]
include h in
/-- When a left homology data is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the kernel of `S.g : S.X₂ ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hg : PreservesLimit (parallelPair S.g 0) F :=
@IsPreservedBy.g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h F _ _
/-- When a left homology data `h` is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the cokernel of `h.f' : S.X₁ ⟶ h.K`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hf' : PreservesColimit (parallelPair h.f' 0) F := IsPreservedBy.f'
/-- When a left homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F`,
this is the induced left homology data `h.map F` for the short complex `S.map F`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def map : (S.map F).LeftHomologyData := by
have := IsPreservedBy.hg h F
have := IsPreservedBy.hf' h F
have wi : F.map h.i ≫ F.map S.g = 0 := by rw [← F.map_comp, h.wi, F.map_zero]
have hi := KernelFork.mapIsLimit _ h.hi F
let f' : F.obj S.X₁ ⟶ F.obj h.K := hi.lift (KernelFork.ofι (S.map F).f (S.map F).zero)
have hf' : f' = F.map h.f' := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hi (by
rw [Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι hi]
simp only [KernelFork.map_ι, Fork.ι_ofι, map_f, ← F.map_comp, f'_i])
have wπ : f' ≫ F.map h.π = 0 := by rw [hf', ← F.map_comp, f'_π, F.map_zero]
have hπ : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (F.map h.π) wπ) := by
let e : parallelPair f' 0 ≅ parallelPair (F.map h.f') 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using hf') (by simp)
refine IsColimit.precomposeInvEquiv e _
(IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (CokernelCofork.mapIsColimit _ h.hπ' F) ?_)
exact Cofork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [e])
exact
{ K := F.obj h.K
H := F.obj h.H
i := F.map h.i
π := F.map h.π
wi := wi
hi := hi
wπ := wπ
hπ := hπ }
@[simp]
lemma map_f' : (h.map F).f' = F.map h.f' := by
rw [← cancel_mono (h.map F).i, f'_i, map_f, map_i, ← F.map_comp, f'_i]
end LeftHomologyData
/-- Given a left homology map data `ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂` such that
both left homology data `h₁` and `h₂` are preserved by a functor `F`, this is
the induced left homology map data for the morphism `F.mapShortComplex.map φ`. -/
@[simps]
def LeftHomologyMapData.map {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData} (ψ : LeftHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h₁.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.IsPreservedBy F] :
LeftHomologyMapData (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) where
φK := F.map ψ.φK
φH := F.map ψ.φH
commi := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commi
commf' := by simpa only [LeftHomologyData.map_f', F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commf'
commπ := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commπ
namespace RightHomologyData
variable (h : S.RightHomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A right homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F` is
`F` preserves the cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂` and the kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
class IsPreservedBy [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves the cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
f : PreservesColimit (parallelPair S.f 0) F
/-- the functor preserves the kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
g' : PreservesLimit (parallelPair h.g' 0) F
variable [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
noncomputable instance isPreservedBy_of_preservesHomology [F.PreservesHomology] :
h.IsPreservedBy F where
f := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesCokernel F _
g' := Functor.PreservesHomology.preservesKernel F _
variable [h.IsPreservedBy F]
include h in
/-- When a right homology data is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the cokernel of `S.f : S.X₁ ⟶ S.X₂`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hf : PreservesColimit (parallelPair S.f 0) F :=
@IsPreservedBy.f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h F _ _
/-- When a right homology data `h` is preserved by a functor `F`, this functor
preserves the kernel of `h.g' : h.Q ⟶ S.X₃`. -/
lemma IsPreservedBy.hg' : PreservesLimit (parallelPair h.g' 0) F :=
@IsPreservedBy.g' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h F _ _
/-- When a right homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is preserved by a functor `F`,
this is the induced right homology data `h.map F` for the short complex `S.map F`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def map : (S.map F).RightHomologyData := by
have := IsPreservedBy.hf h F
have := IsPreservedBy.hg' h F
have wp : F.map S.f ≫ F.map h.p = 0 := by rw [← F.map_comp, h.wp, F.map_zero]
have hp := CokernelCofork.mapIsColimit _ h.hp F
let g' : F.obj h.Q ⟶ F.obj S.X₃ := hp.desc (CokernelCofork.ofπ (S.map F).g (S.map F).zero)
have hg' : g' = F.map h.g' := by
apply Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hp
rw [Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc hp]
simp only [Cofork.π_ofπ, CokernelCofork.map_π, map_g, ← F.map_comp, p_g']
have wι : F.map h.ι ≫ g' = 0 := by rw [hg', ← F.map_comp, ι_g', F.map_zero]
have hι : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (F.map h.ι) wι) := by
let e : parallelPair g' 0 ≅ parallelPair (F.map h.g') 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simpa using hg') (by simp)
refine IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv e _
(IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (KernelFork.mapIsLimit _ h.hι' F) ?_)
exact Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [e])
exact
{ Q := F.obj h.Q
H := F.obj h.H
p := F.map h.p
ι := F.map h.ι
wp := wp
hp := hp
wι := wι
hι := hι }
@[simp]
lemma map_g' : (h.map F).g' = F.map h.g' := by
rw [← cancel_epi (h.map F).p, p_g', map_g, map_p, ← F.map_comp, p_g']
end RightHomologyData
/-- Given a right homology map data `ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂` such that
both right homology data `h₁` and `h₂` are preserved by a functor `F`, this is
the induced right homology map data for the morphism `F.mapShortComplex.map φ`. -/
@[simps]
def RightHomologyMapData.map {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData}
{h₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData} (ψ : RightHomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [h₁.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.IsPreservedBy F] :
RightHomologyMapData (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) where
φQ := F.map ψ.φQ
φH := F.map ψ.φH
commp := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commp
commg' := by simpa only [RightHomologyData.map_g', F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commg'
commι := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map ψ.commι
/-- When a homology data `h` of a short complex `S` is such that both `h.left` and
`h.right` are preserved by a functor `F`, this is the induced homology data
`h.map F` for the short complex `S.map F`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def HomologyData.map (h : S.HomologyData) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[h.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h.right.IsPreservedBy F] :
(S.map F).HomologyData where
left := h.left.map F
right := h.right.map F
iso := F.mapIso h.iso
comm := by simpa only [F.map_comp] using F.congr_map h.comm
/-- Given a homology map data `ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂` such that
`h₁.left`, `h₁.right`, `h₂.left` and `h₂.right` are all preserved by a functor `F`, this is
the induced homology map data for the morphism `F.mapShortComplex.map φ`. -/
@[simps]
def HomologyMapData.map {φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂} {h₁ : S₁.HomologyData} {h₂ : S₂.HomologyData}
(ψ : HomologyMapData φ h₁ h₂) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[h₁.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₁.right.IsPreservedBy F]
[h₂.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.right.IsPreservedBy F] :
HomologyMapData (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) where
left := ψ.left.map F
right := ψ.right.map F
end ShortComplex
namespace Functor
variable (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesZeroMorphisms F] (S : ShortComplex C) {S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C}
/-- A functor preserves the left homology of a short complex `S` if it preserves all the
left homology data of `S`. -/
class PreservesLeftHomologyOf : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves all the left homology data of the short complex -/
isPreservedBy : ∀ (h : S.LeftHomologyData), h.IsPreservedBy F
/-- A functor preserves the right homology of a short complex `S` if it preserves all the
right homology data of `S`. -/
class PreservesRightHomologyOf : Prop where
/-- the functor preserves all the right homology data of the short complex -/
isPreservedBy : ∀ (h : S.RightHomologyData), h.IsPreservedBy F
instance PreservesHomology.preservesLeftHomologyOf [F.PreservesHomology] :
F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S := ⟨inferInstance⟩
instance PreservesHomology.preservesRightHomologyOf [F.PreservesHomology] :
F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S := ⟨inferInstance⟩
variable {S}
/-- If a functor preserves a certain left homology data of a short complex `S`, then it
preserves the left homology of `S`. -/
lemma PreservesLeftHomologyOf.mk' (h : S.LeftHomologyData) [h.IsPreservedBy F] :
F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S where
isPreservedBy h' :=
{ g := ShortComplex.LeftHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hg h F
f' := by
have := ShortComplex.LeftHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hf' h F
let e : parallelPair h.f' 0 ≅ parallelPair h'.f' 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (ShortComplex.cyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl S) h h')
(by simp) (by simp)
exact preservesColimit_of_iso_diagram F e }
/-- If a functor preserves a certain right homology data of a short complex `S`, then it
preserves the right homology of `S`. -/
lemma PreservesRightHomologyOf.mk' (h : S.RightHomologyData) [h.IsPreservedBy F] :
F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S where
isPreservedBy h' :=
{ f := ShortComplex.RightHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hf h F
g' := by
have := ShortComplex.RightHomologyData.IsPreservedBy.hg' h F
let e : parallelPair h.g' 0 ≅ parallelPair h'.g' 0 :=
parallelPair.ext (ShortComplex.opcyclesMapIso' (Iso.refl S) h h') (Iso.refl _)
(by simp) (by simp)
exact preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram F e }
end Functor
namespace ShortComplex
variable {S : ShortComplex C} (h₁ : S.LeftHomologyData) (h₂ : S.RightHomologyData)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
instance LeftHomologyData.isPreservedBy_of_preserves [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
h₁.IsPreservedBy F :=
Functor.PreservesLeftHomologyOf.isPreservedBy _
instance RightHomologyData.isPreservedBy_of_preserves [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
h₂.IsPreservedBy F :=
Functor.PreservesRightHomologyOf.isPreservedBy _
variable (S)
instance hasLeftHomology_of_preserves [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).HasLeftHomology :=
HasLeftHomology.mk' (S.leftHomologyData.map F)
instance hasLeftHomology_of_preserves' [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(F.mapShortComplex.obj S).HasLeftHomology := by
dsimp; infer_instance
instance hasRightHomology_of_preserves [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).HasRightHomology :=
HasRightHomology.mk' (S.rightHomologyData.map F)
instance hasRightHomology_of_preserves' [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(F.mapShortComplex.obj S).HasRightHomology := by
dsimp; infer_instance
instance hasHomology_of_preserves [S.HasHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).HasHomology :=
HasHomology.mk' (S.homologyData.map F)
instance hasHomology_of_preserves' [S.HasHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(F.mapShortComplex.obj S).HasHomology := by
dsimp; infer_instance
section
variable
(hl : S.LeftHomologyData) (hr : S.RightHomologyData)
{S₁ S₂ : ShortComplex C} (φ : S₁ ⟶ S₂)
(hl₁ : S₁.LeftHomologyData) (hr₁ : S₁.RightHomologyData)
(hl₂ : S₂.LeftHomologyData) (hr₂ : S₂.RightHomologyData)
(h₁ : S₁.HomologyData) (h₂ : S₂.HomologyData)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
namespace LeftHomologyData
variable [hl₁.IsPreservedBy F] [hl₂.IsPreservedBy F]
lemma map_cyclesMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.cyclesMap' φ hl₁ hl₂) =
ShortComplex.cyclesMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hl₁.map F) (hl₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData φ hl₁ hl₂ := default
rw [γ.cyclesMap'_eq, (γ.map F).cyclesMap'_eq, ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData.map_φK]
lemma map_leftHomologyMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.leftHomologyMap' φ hl₁ hl₂) =
ShortComplex.leftHomologyMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hl₁.map F) (hl₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData φ hl₁ hl₂ := default
rw [γ.leftHomologyMap'_eq, (γ.map F).leftHomologyMap'_eq,
ShortComplex.LeftHomologyMapData.map_φH]
end LeftHomologyData
namespace RightHomologyData
variable [hr₁.IsPreservedBy F] [hr₂.IsPreservedBy F]
lemma map_opcyclesMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.opcyclesMap' φ hr₁ hr₂) =
ShortComplex.opcyclesMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hr₁.map F) (hr₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData φ hr₁ hr₂ := default
rw [γ.opcyclesMap'_eq, (γ.map F).opcyclesMap'_eq, ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData.map_φQ]
lemma map_rightHomologyMap' : F.map (ShortComplex.rightHomologyMap' φ hr₁ hr₂) =
ShortComplex.rightHomologyMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (hr₁.map F) (hr₂.map F) := by
have γ : ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData φ hr₁ hr₂ := default
rw [γ.rightHomologyMap'_eq, (γ.map F).rightHomologyMap'_eq,
ShortComplex.RightHomologyMapData.map_φH]
end RightHomologyData
lemma HomologyData.map_homologyMap'
[h₁.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₁.right.IsPreservedBy F]
[h₂.left.IsPreservedBy F] [h₂.right.IsPreservedBy F] :
F.map (ShortComplex.homologyMap' φ h₁ h₂) =
ShortComplex.homologyMap' (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) (h₁.map F) (h₂.map F) :=
LeftHomologyData.map_leftHomologyMap' _ _ _ _
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the left homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).cycles ≅ F.obj S.cycles`. -/
noncomputable def mapCyclesIso [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).cycles ≅ F.obj S.cycles :=
(S.leftHomologyData.map F).cyclesIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma mapCyclesIso_hom_iCycles [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.mapCyclesIso F).hom ≫ F.map S.iCycles = (S.map F).iCycles := by
apply LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso_hom_comp_i
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the left homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).leftHomology ≅ F.obj S.leftHomology`. -/
noncomputable def mapLeftHomologyIso [S.HasLeftHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).leftHomology ≅ F.obj S.leftHomology :=
(S.leftHomologyData.map F).leftHomologyIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the right homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).opcycles ≅ F.obj S.opcycles`. -/
noncomputable def mapOpcyclesIso [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).opcycles ≅ F.obj S.opcycles :=
(S.rightHomologyData.map F).opcyclesIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the right homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).rightHomology ≅ F.obj S.rightHomology`. -/
noncomputable def mapRightHomologyIso [S.HasRightHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).rightHomology ≅ F.obj S.rightHomology :=
(S.rightHomologyData.map F).rightHomologyIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the left homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def mapHomologyIso [S.HasHomology] [(S.map F).HasHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology :=
(S.homologyData.left.map F).homologyIso
/-- When a functor `F` preserves the right homology of a short complex `S`, this is the
canonical isomorphism `(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology`. -/
noncomputable def mapHomologyIso' [S.HasHomology] [(S.map F).HasHomology]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
(S.map F).homology ≅ F.obj S.homology :=
(S.homologyData.right.map F).homologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso S.homologyData.right.homologyIso.symm
variable {S}
lemma LeftHomologyData.mapCyclesIso_eq [S.HasLeftHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
S.mapCyclesIso F = (hl.map F).cyclesIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hl.cyclesIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapCyclesIso, cyclesIso]
simp only [map_cyclesMap', ← cyclesMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma LeftHomologyData.mapLeftHomologyIso_eq [S.HasLeftHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
S.mapLeftHomologyIso F = (hl.map F).leftHomologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hl.leftHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapLeftHomologyIso, leftHomologyIso]
simp only [map_leftHomologyMap', ← leftHomologyMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma RightHomologyData.mapOpcyclesIso_eq [S.HasRightHomology]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
S.mapOpcyclesIso F = (hr.map F).opcyclesIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hr.opcyclesIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapOpcyclesIso, opcyclesIso]
simp only [map_opcyclesMap', ← opcyclesMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma RightHomologyData.mapRightHomologyIso_eq [S.HasRightHomology]
[F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
S.mapRightHomologyIso F = (hr.map F).rightHomologyIso ≪≫
F.mapIso hr.rightHomologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp [mapRightHomologyIso, rightHomologyIso]
simp only [map_rightHomologyMap', ← rightHomologyMap'_comp, Functor.map_id, comp_id,
Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma LeftHomologyData.mapHomologyIso_eq [S.HasHomology]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S] :
S.mapHomologyIso F = (hl.map F).homologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hl.homologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp only [mapHomologyIso, homologyIso, ShortComplex.leftHomologyIso,
leftHomologyMapIso', leftHomologyIso, Functor.mapIso,
Iso.symm, Iso.trans, Iso.refl]
simp only [F.map_comp, map_leftHomologyMap', ← leftHomologyMap'_comp, comp_id,
Functor.map_id, Functor.mapShortComplex_obj]
lemma RightHomologyData.mapHomologyIso'_eq [S.HasHomology]
[(S.map F).HasHomology] [F.PreservesRightHomologyOf S] :
S.mapHomologyIso' F = (hr.map F).homologyIso ≪≫ F.mapIso hr.homologyIso.symm := by
ext
dsimp only [Iso.trans, Iso.symm, Iso.refl, Functor.mapIso, mapHomologyIso', homologyIso,
rightHomologyIso, rightHomologyMapIso', ShortComplex.rightHomologyIso]
| simp only [assoc, F.map_comp, map_rightHomologyMap', ← rightHomologyMap'_comp_assoc]
@[reassoc]
lemma mapCyclesIso_hom_naturality [S₁.HasLeftHomology] [S₂.HasLeftHomology]
[F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S₁] [F.PreservesLeftHomologyOf S₂] :
cyclesMap (F.mapShortComplex.map φ) ≫ (S₂.mapCyclesIso F).hom =
(S₁.mapCyclesIso F).hom ≫ F.map (cyclesMap φ) := by
dsimp only [cyclesMap, mapCyclesIso, LeftHomologyData.cyclesIso, cyclesMapIso', Iso.refl]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/PreservesHomology.lean | 493 | 500 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Range
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.MulChar.Basic
/-!
# Quadratic characters on ℤ/nℤ
This file defines some quadratic characters on the rings ℤ/4ℤ and ℤ/8ℤ.
We set them up to be of type `MulChar (ZMod n) ℤ`, where `n` is `4` or `8`.
## Tags
quadratic character, zmod
-/
/-!
### Quadratic characters mod 4 and 8
We define the primitive quadratic characters `χ₄`on `ZMod 4`
and `χ₈`, `χ₈'` on `ZMod 8`.
-/
namespace ZMod
section QuadCharModP
/-- Define the nontrivial quadratic character on `ZMod 4`, `χ₄`.
It corresponds to the extension `ℚ(√-1)/ℚ`. -/
@[simps]
def χ₄ : MulChar (ZMod 4) ℤ where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 | 2 => 0
| 1 => 1
| 3 => -1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by decide
map_nonunit' := by decide
/-- `χ₄` takes values in `{0, 1, -1}` -/
theorem isQuadratic_χ₄ : χ₄.IsQuadratic := by
unfold MulChar.IsQuadratic
decide
/-- The value of `χ₄ n`, for `n : ℕ`, depends only on `n % 4`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_mod_four (n : ℕ) : χ₄ n = χ₄ (n % 4 : ℕ) := by
rw [← ZMod.natCast_mod n 4]
/-- The value of `χ₄ n`, for `n : ℤ`, depends only on `n % 4`. -/
theorem χ₄_int_mod_four (n : ℤ) : χ₄ n = χ₄ (n % 4 : ℤ) := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_mod n 4, Nat.cast_ofNat]
/-- An explicit description of `χ₄` on integers / naturals -/
theorem χ₄_int_eq_if_mod_four (n : ℤ) :
χ₄ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 4 = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
have help : ∀ m : ℤ, 0 ≤ m → m < 4 → χ₄ m = if m % 2 = 0 then 0 else if m = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
decide
rw [← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n (by omega : (2 : ℤ) ∣ 4), ← ZMod.intCast_mod n 4]
exact help (n % 4) (Int.emod_nonneg n (by omega)) (Int.emod_lt_abs n (by omega))
theorem χ₄_nat_eq_if_mod_four (n : ℕ) :
χ₄ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 4 = 1 then 1 else -1 :=
mod_cast χ₄_int_eq_if_mod_four n
/-- Alternative description of `χ₄ n` for odd `n : ℕ` in terms of powers of `-1` -/
theorem χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 2 = 1) : χ₄ n = (-1) ^ (n / 2) := by
rw [χ₄_nat_eq_if_mod_four]
simp only [hn, Nat.one_ne_zero, if_false]
nth_rewrite 3 [← Nat.div_add_mod n 4]
nth_rewrite 3 [show 4 = 2 * 2 by omega]
rw [mul_assoc, add_comm, Nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ zero_lt_two, pow_add, pow_mul,
neg_one_sq, one_pow, mul_one]
have help : ∀ m : ℕ, m < 4 → m % 2 = 1 → ite (m = 1) (1 : ℤ) (-1) = (-1) ^ (m / 2) := by decide
exact help _ (Nat.mod_lt n (by omega)) <| (Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd n (by omega : 2 ∣ 4)).trans hn
/-- If `n % 4 = 1`, then `χ₄ n = 1`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_one_mod_four {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 4 = 1) : χ₄ n = 1 := by
rw [χ₄_nat_mod_four, hn]
rfl
/-- If `n % 4 = 3`, then `χ₄ n = -1`. -/
theorem χ₄_nat_three_mod_four {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 4 = 3) : χ₄ n = -1 := by
rw [χ₄_nat_mod_four, hn]
rfl
/-- If `n % 4 = 1`, then `χ₄ n = 1`. -/
theorem χ₄_int_one_mod_four {n : ℤ} (hn : n % 4 = 1) : χ₄ n = 1 := by
rw [χ₄_int_mod_four, hn]
rfl
/-- If `n % 4 = 3`, then `χ₄ n = -1`. -/
theorem χ₄_int_three_mod_four {n : ℤ} (hn : n % 4 = 3) : χ₄ n = -1 := by
rw [χ₄_int_mod_four, hn]
rfl
/-- If `n % 4 = 1`, then `(-1)^(n/2) = 1`. -/
theorem neg_one_pow_div_two_of_one_mod_four {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 4 = 1) : (-1 : ℤ) ^ (n / 2) = 1 :=
χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow (Nat.odd_of_mod_four_eq_one hn) ▸ χ₄_nat_one_mod_four hn
/-- If `n % 4 = 3`, then `(-1)^(n/2) = -1`. -/
theorem neg_one_pow_div_two_of_three_mod_four {n : ℕ} (hn : n % 4 = 3) : (-1 : ℤ) ^ (n / 2) = -1 :=
χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow (Nat.odd_of_mod_four_eq_three hn) ▸ χ₄_nat_three_mod_four hn
/-- Define the first primitive quadratic character on `ZMod 8`, `χ₈`.
It corresponds to the extension `ℚ(√2)/ℚ`. -/
@[simps]
def χ₈ : MulChar (ZMod 8) ℤ where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 => 0
| 1 | 7 => 1
| 3 | 5 => -1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by decide
map_nonunit' := by decide
/-- `χ₈` takes values in `{0, 1, -1}` -/
theorem isQuadratic_χ₈ : χ₈.IsQuadratic := by
unfold MulChar.IsQuadratic
decide
/-- The value of `χ₈ n`, for `n : ℕ`, depends only on `n % 8`. -/
theorem χ₈_nat_mod_eight (n : ℕ) : χ₈ n = χ₈ (n % 8 : ℕ) := by
rw [← ZMod.natCast_mod n 8]
/-- The value of `χ₈ n`, for `n : ℤ`, depends only on `n % 8`. -/
theorem χ₈_int_mod_eight (n : ℤ) : χ₈ n = χ₈ (n % 8 : ℤ) := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_mod n 8, Nat.cast_ofNat]
/-- An explicit description of `χ₈` on integers / naturals -/
theorem χ₈_int_eq_if_mod_eight (n : ℤ) :
χ₈ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 8 = 1 ∨ n % 8 = 7 then 1 else -1 := by
have help :
∀ m : ℤ, 0 ≤ m → m < 8 → χ₈ m = if m % 2 = 0 then 0 else if m = 1 ∨ m = 7 then 1 else -1 := by
decide
rw [← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n (by omega : (2 : ℤ) ∣ 8), ← ZMod.intCast_mod n 8]
exact help (n % 8) (Int.emod_nonneg n (by omega)) (Int.emod_lt_abs n (by omega))
theorem χ₈_nat_eq_if_mod_eight (n : ℕ) :
χ₈ n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 8 = 1 ∨ n % 8 = 7 then 1 else -1 :=
mod_cast χ₈_int_eq_if_mod_eight n
/-- Define the second primitive quadratic character on `ZMod 8`, `χ₈'`.
It corresponds to the extension `ℚ(√-2)/ℚ`. -/
@[simps]
def χ₈' : MulChar (ZMod 8) ℤ where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 => 0
| 1 | 3 => 1
| 5 | 7 => -1
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by decide
map_nonunit' := by decide
/-- `χ₈'` takes values in `{0, 1, -1}` -/
theorem isQuadratic_χ₈' : χ₈'.IsQuadratic := by
unfold MulChar.IsQuadratic
decide
/-- An explicit description of `χ₈'` on integers / naturals -/
theorem χ₈'_int_eq_if_mod_eight (n : ℤ) :
χ₈' n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 8 = 1 ∨ n % 8 = 3 then 1 else -1 := by
have help :
∀ m : ℤ, 0 ≤ m → m < 8 → χ₈' m = if m % 2 = 0 then 0 else if m = 1 ∨ m = 3 then 1 else -1 := by
decide
rw [← Int.emod_emod_of_dvd n (by omega : (2 : ℤ) ∣ 8), ← ZMod.intCast_mod n 8]
exact help (n % 8) (Int.emod_nonneg n (by omega)) (Int.emod_lt_abs n (by omega))
theorem χ₈'_nat_eq_if_mod_eight (n : ℕ) :
χ₈' n = if n % 2 = 0 then 0 else if n % 8 = 1 ∨ n % 8 = 3 then 1 else -1 :=
mod_cast χ₈'_int_eq_if_mod_eight n
/-- The relation between `χ₄`, `χ₈` and `χ₈'` -/
theorem χ₈'_eq_χ₄_mul_χ₈ : ∀ a : ZMod 8, χ₈' a = χ₄ (cast a) * χ₈ a := by
decide
theorem χ₈'_int_eq_χ₄_mul_χ₈ (a : ℤ) : χ₈' a = χ₄ a * χ₈ a := by
rw [← @cast_intCast 8 (ZMod 4) _ 4 _ (by omega) a]
exact χ₈'_eq_χ₄_mul_χ₈ a
end QuadCharModP
end ZMod
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/ZModChar.lean | 212 | 214 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Basic
/-!
# Non-unital Subalgebras over Commutative Semirings
In this file we define `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
universe u u' v v' w w'
section NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
variable {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- Embedding of a non-unital subalgebra into the non-unital algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype s, SMulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = ((↑) : s → A) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that is also a submodule. -/
structure NonUnitalSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubsemiring A, Submodule R A
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `Submodule`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and `SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem := @fun s => s.smul_mem'
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubsemiring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubsemiring A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = U.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff
theorem mem_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) {x} : x ∈ S.toSubmodule ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubmodule : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Submodule R A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, h]
theorem toSubmodule_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = U.toSubmodule ↔ S = U :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a non-unital subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.copy s hs with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : a ∈ s) => by
show r • a ∈ s
rw [hs] at ha ⊢
exact S.smul_mem' r ha }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring)⟩
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := @fun _ x hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
/-- A non-unital subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubring A where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
neg_mem' := neg_mem (s := S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_injective :
Function.Injective (toNonUnitalSubring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubring A) :=
fun S T h => ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubring = U.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section
/-! `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `NonUnitalSubsemiring` / `Semiring`
coercions. -/
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommRing S :=
inferInstance
end
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `Submodule` as an `OrderEmbedding` -/
def toSubmodule' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o Submodule R A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toSubmodule
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubsemiring' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubsemiring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubring' [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
variable {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A}
section
/-! ### `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Submodule` coercions. -/
instance instModule' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] : Module R' S :=
SMulMemClass.toModule' _ R' R A S
instance instModule : Module R S :=
S.instModule'
instance instIsScalarTower' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] :
IsScalarTower R' R S :=
S.toSubmodule.isScalarTower
instance [IsScalarTower R A A] : IsScalarTower R S S where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : A) (y : A)
instance instSMulCommClass' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A]
[SMulCommClass R' R A] : SMulCommClass R' R S where
smul_comm r' r s := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r' r (s : A)
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R A A] : SMulCommClass R S S where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : A) (y : A)
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_bot [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R S :=
⟨fun {c x} h =>
have : c = 0 ∨ (x : A) = 0 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (congr_arg ((↑) : S → A) h)
this.imp_right (@Subtype.ext_iff _ _ x 0).mpr⟩
end
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : A) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : A) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : A) = 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x : S) : (↑(-x) : A) = -↑x :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x y : S) : (↑(x - y) : A) = ↑x - ↑y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMul R' R] [SMul R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] (r : R') (x : S) :
↑(r • x) = r • (x : A) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_eq_zero {x : S} : (x : A) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_subtype :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_subtype {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
NonUnitalSubringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
/-- Linear equivalence between `S : Submodule R A` and `S`. Though these types are equal,
we define it as a `LinearEquiv` to avoid type equalities. -/
def toSubmoduleEquiv (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : S.toSubmodule ≃ₗ[R] S :=
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ rfl
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Transport a non-unital subalgebra via an algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r b hb => by
rcases hb with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact map_smulₛₗ f r a ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem f (S.smul_mem' r ha) }
theorem map_mono {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → (map f S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ≤ map f S₂ :=
Set.image_subset f
theorem map_injective {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
fun _S₁ _S₂ ih =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 <| Set.image_injective.2 hf <| Set.ext <| SetLike.ext_iff.mp ih
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : map (NonUnitalAlgHom.id R A) S = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {y : B} : y ∈ map f S ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_map
theorem map_toSubmodule {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
-- TODO: introduce a better coercion from `NonUnitalAlgHomClass` to `LinearMap`
(map f S).toSubmodule = Submodule.map (LinearMapClass.linearMap f) S.toSubmodule :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem map_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
(map f S).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (f : F) : (map f S : Set B) = f '' S :=
rfl
/-- Preimage of a non-unital subalgebra under an algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.comap (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : f a ∈ S) =>
show f (r • a) ∈ S from (map_smulₛₗ f r a).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r ha }
theorem map_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B} :
map f S ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap f U :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
GaloisConnection (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ => map_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) (x : A) : x ∈ comap f S ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) : (comap f S : Set A) = f ⁻¹' (S : Set B) :=
rfl
instance noZeroDivisors {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
[Module R A] (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NoZeroDivisors S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors S
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace Submodule
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
/-- A submodule closed under multiplication is a non-unital subalgebra. -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul : ∀ x y, x ∈ p → y ∈ p → x * y ∈ p) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ p with
mul_mem' := h_mul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {p : Submodule R A} {h_mul} {x} :
x ∈ p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul : Set A) = p :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_mk (p : Submodule R A) hmul :
p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra hmul =
NonUnitalSubalgebra.mk ⟨⟨⟨p, p.add_mem⟩, p.zero_mem⟩, hmul _ _⟩ p.smul_mem' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_toSubmodule (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul).toSubmodule = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S.toSubmodule.toNonUnitalSubalgebra fun _ _ => mul_mem (s := S)) = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
end Submodule
namespace NonUnitalAlgHom
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Range of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` as a non-unital subalgebra. -/
protected def range (φ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := NonUnitalRingHom.srange (φ : A →ₙ+* B)
smul_mem' := fun r a => by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r • a, map_smul φ r a⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (φ : F) {y : B} :
y ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ↔ ∃ x : A, φ x = y :=
NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem mem_range_self (φ : F) (x : A) :
φ x ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
(NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range φ).2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (φ : F) :
((NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : Set B) = Set.range (φ : A → B) := by
ext
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_range]
rfl
theorem range_comp (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) = (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) ≤ NonUnitalAlgHom.range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital algebra homomorphism. -/
def codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →ₙₐ[R] S :=
{ NonUnitalRingHom.codRestrict (f : A →ₙ+* B) S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring hf with
map_smul' := fun r a => Subtype.ext <| map_smul f r a }
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
(NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype S).comp (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) (x : A) :
↑(NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem injective_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
Function.Injective (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun H _x _y hxy => H <| Subtype.eq hxy, fun H _x _y hxy => H (congr_arg Subtype.val hxy :)⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict (f : F) : A →ₙₐ[R] (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f) (NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range_self f)
/-- The equalizer of two non-unital `R`-algebra homomorphisms -/
def equalizer (ϕ ψ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := {a | (ϕ a : B) = ψ a}
zero_mem' := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_zero, map_zero]
add_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
mul_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_mul, map_mul, hx, hy]
smul_mem' r x (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_smul, map_smul, hx]
@[simp]
theorem mem_equalizer (φ ψ : F) (x : A) :
x ∈ NonUnitalAlgHom.equalizer φ ψ ↔ φ x = ψ x :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The range of a morphism of algebras is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note that this instance can cause a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` if `B` is also a fintype. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype A] [DecidableEq B] (φ : F) :
Fintype (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ) :=
Set.fintypeRange φ
end NonUnitalAlgHom
namespace NonUnitalAlgebra
variable {F : Type*} (R : Type u) {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
@[simp]
lemma span_eq_toSubmodule (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
Submodule.span R (s : Set A) = s.toSubmodule := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.coe_span_eq_self]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
section IsScalarTower
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The minimal non-unital subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : Set A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) with
mul_mem' :=
@fun a b (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A))
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A)) =>
show a * b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) by
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ha
· refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hb
· exact fun x (hx : x ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) y
(hy : y ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) => Submodule.subset_span (mul_mem hy hx)
· exact fun x _hx => (mul_zero x).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ hx hy z hz => (mul_add z x y).symm ▸ add_mem (hx z hz) (hy z hz)
· exact fun r x _ hx y hy =>
(mul_smul_comm r y x).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r (hx y hy)
· exact (zero_mul b).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ => (add_mul x y b).symm ▸ add_mem
· exact fun r x _ hx => (smul_mul_assoc r x b).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx }
theorem adjoin_toSubmodule (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toSubmodule = Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) :=
rfl
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_adjoin {s : Set A} : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span
theorem self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R (Set.mem_singleton x)
variable {R}
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) :=
fun s S =>
⟨fun H => (NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span).trans H,
fun H => show Submodule.span R _ ≤ S.toSubmodule from Submodule.span_le.mpr <|
show NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s ≤ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring from
NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_le.2 H⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `Subtype.val`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) where
choice s hs := (adjoin R s).copy s <| le_antisymm (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
le_l_u S := (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc (S : Set A) (adjoin R S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := NonUnitalSubalgebra.copy_eq _ _ _
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice NonUnitalAlgebra.gi
theorem adjoin_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} (hs : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.l_le hs
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc _ _
theorem adjoin_union (s t : Set A) : adjoin R (s ∪ t) = adjoin R s ⊔ adjoin R t :=
(NonUnitalAlgebra.gc : GaloisConnection _ ((↑) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Set A)).l_sup
lemma adjoin_eq (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : adjoin R (s : Set A) = s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le le_rfl) (subset_adjoin R)
/-- If some predicate holds for all `x ∈ (s : Set A)` and this predicate is closed under the
`algebraMap`, addition, multiplication and star operations, then it holds for `a ∈ adjoin R s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set A} {p : (x : A) → x ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_adjoin R hx))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) (zero : p 0 (zero_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(smul : ∀ r x hx, p x hx → p (r • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx))
{x} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) : p x hx :=
let S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
add_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hb⟩)
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩ }
adjoin_le (S := S) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_adjoin R hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction₂ {s : Set A} {p : ∀ x y, x ∈ adjoin R s → y ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem_mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_adjoin R hx) (subset_adjoin R hy))
(zero_left : ∀ x hx, p 0 x (zero_mem _) hx) (zero_right : ∀ x hx, p x 0 hx (zero_mem _))
(add_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x + y) z (add_mem hx hy) hz)
(add_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y + z) hx (add_mem hy hz))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y * z) hx (mul_mem hy hz))
(smul_left : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p (r • x) y (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx) hy)
(smul_right : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p x (r • y) hx (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hy))
{x y : A} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) (hy : y ∈ adjoin R s) :
p x y hx hy := by
induction hy using adjoin_induction with
| mem z hz =>
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_mem _ _ h hz
| zero => exact zero_left _ _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_left _ _ _ _ _ h
| zero => exact zero_right x hx
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_right _ _ _ _ _ h
open Submodule in
lemma adjoin_eq_span (s : Set A) : (adjoin R s).toSubmodule = span R (Subsemigroup.closure s) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem x hx => exact subset_span <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure hx
| add x y _ _ hpx hpy => exact add_mem hpx hpy
| zero => exact zero_mem _
| mul x y _ _ hpx hpy =>
apply span_induction₂ ?Hs (by simp) (by simp) ?Hadd_l ?Hadd_r ?Hsmul_l ?Hsmul_r hpx hpy
case Hs => exact fun x y hx hy ↦ subset_span <| mul_mem hx hy
case Hadd_l => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [add_mul] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hadd_r => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [mul_add] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hsmul_l => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [smul_mul_assoc] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
case Hsmul_r => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [mul_smul_comm] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
| smul r x _ hpx => exact smul_mem _ _ hpx
· apply span_le.2 _
show Subsemigroup.closure s ≤ (adjoin R s).toSubsemigroup
exact Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 (subset_adjoin R)
variable (R A)
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty : adjoin R (∅ : Set A) = ⊥ :=
show adjoin R ⊥ = ⊥ by apply GaloisConnection.l_bot; exact NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ : adjoin R (Set.univ : Set A) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun _x hx => subset_adjoin R hx
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (s : Set A) : map f (adjoin R s) = adjoin R (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc
NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc fun _t => rfl
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
@[simp]
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin_singleton [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (x : A) : map f (adjoin R {x}) = adjoin R {f x} := by
simp [NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin]
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : (↑(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toSubmodule = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
[IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A] :
(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule'.injective.eq_iff' top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff' top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem to_subring_eq_top {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff' top_toSubring
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_left
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_right
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) :
x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
theorem map_sup [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊔ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(NonUnitalSubalgebra.gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_inf [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊓ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊓ T.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑(S ⊓ T) : Set A) = (S : Set A) ∩ T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubmodule = S.toSubmodule ⊓ T.toSubmodule :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S ⊓ T).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ⊓ T.toNonUnitalSubsemiring :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set A) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
sInf_image
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A)} {x : A} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p := by
simp only [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_sInf, Set.mem_iInter₂]
@[simp]
| theorem sInf_toSubmodule (S : Set (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A)) :
(sInf S).toSubmodule = sInf (NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule '' S) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 784 | 785 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.PrimitiveRoots
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Complex
/-!
# Embeddings of number fields
This file defines the embeddings of a number field into an algebraic closed field.
## Main Definitions and Results
* `NumberField.Embeddings.range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly`: let `x ∈ K` with `K` number field and
let `A` be an algebraic closed field of char. 0, then the images of `x` by the embeddings of `K`
in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`.
* `NumberField.Embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one`: an algebraic integer whose conjugates are
all of norm one is a root of unity.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace`: the type of infinite places of a number field `K`.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_eq_iff`: two complex embeddings define the same infinite place iff
they are equal or complex conjugates.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm`: the infinite part of the product formula, that is
for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where the product is over the infinite place `w` and
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`.
## Tags
number field, embeddings, places, infinite places
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace NumberField.Embeddings
section Fintype
open Module
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable (A : Type*) [Field A] [CharZero A]
/-- There are finitely many embeddings of a number field. -/
noncomputable instance : Fintype (K →+* A) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (K →ₐ[ℚ] A) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm
variable [IsAlgClosed A]
/-- The number of embeddings of a number field is equal to its finrank. -/
theorem card : Fintype.card (K →+* A) = finrank ℚ K := by
rw [Fintype.ofEquiv_card RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm, AlgHom.card]
instance : Nonempty (K →+* A) := by
rw [← Fintype.card_pos_iff, NumberField.Embeddings.card K A]
exact Module.finrank_pos
end Fintype
section Roots
open Set Polynomial
variable (K A : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K] [Field A] [Algebra ℚ A] [IsAlgClosed A] (x : K)
/-- Let `A` be an algebraically closed field and let `x ∈ K`, with `K` a number field.
The images of `x` by the embeddings of `K` in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of
the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`. -/
theorem range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly :
(range fun φ : K →+* A => φ x) = (minpoly ℚ x).rootSet A := by
convert (NumberField.isAlgebraic K).range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly A x using 1
ext a
exact ⟨fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRatAlgHom, hφ⟩, fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRingHom, hφ⟩⟩
end Roots
section Bounded
open Module Polynomial Set
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable {A : Type*} [NormedField A] [IsAlgClosed A] [NormedAlgebra ℚ A]
theorem coeff_bdd_of_norm_le {B : ℝ} {x : K} (h : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B) (i : ℕ) :
‖(minpoly ℚ x).coeff i‖ ≤ max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2) := by
have hx := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral ℚ x
rw [← norm_algebraMap' A, ← coeff_map (algebraMap ℚ A)]
refine coeff_bdd_of_roots_le _ (minpoly.monic hx)
(IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) (minpoly.natDegree_le x) (fun z hz => ?_) i
classical
rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hz
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly K A x).symm.subset hz
exact h φ
variable (K A)
/-- Let `B` be a real number. The set of algebraic integers in `K` whose conjugates are all
smaller in norm than `B` is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_norm_le (B : ℝ) : {x : K | IsIntegral ℤ x ∧ ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B}.Finite := by
classical
let C := Nat.ceil (max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2))
have := bUnion_roots_finite (algebraMap ℤ K) (finrank ℚ K) (finite_Icc (-C : ℤ) C)
refine this.subset fun x hx => ?_; simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
have h_map_ℚ_minpoly := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hx.1
refine ⟨_, ⟨?_, fun i => ?_⟩, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨minpoly.ne_zero hx.1, minpoly.aeval ℤ x⟩⟩
· rw [← (minpoly.monic hx.1).natDegree_map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ), ← h_map_ℚ_minpoly]
exact minpoly.natDegree_le x
rw [mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← @Int.cast_le ℝ]
refine (Eq.trans_le ?_ <| coeff_bdd_of_norm_le hx.2 i).trans (Nat.le_ceil _)
rw [h_map_ℚ_minpoly, coeff_map, eq_intCast, Int.norm_cast_rat, Int.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs]
/-- An algebraic integer whose conjugates are all of norm one is a root of unity. -/
theorem pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one {x : K} (hxi : IsIntegral ℤ x) (hx : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ = 1) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), x ^ n = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, -, b, -, habne, h⟩ :=
@Set.Infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo _ _ _ _ (x ^ · : ℕ → K) Set.infinite_univ
(by exact fun a _ => ⟨hxi.pow a, fun φ => by simp [hx φ]⟩) (finite_of_norm_le K A (1 : ℝ))
wlog hlt : b < a
· exact this K A hxi hx b a habne.symm h.symm (habne.lt_or_lt.resolve_right hlt)
refine ⟨a - b, tsub_pos_of_lt hlt, ?_⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le, pow_add, mul_left_eq_self₀] at h
refine h.resolve_right fun hp => ?_
specialize hx (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := ℚ)).toRingHom
rw [pow_eq_zero hp, map_zero, norm_zero] at hx; norm_num at hx
end Bounded
end NumberField.Embeddings
section Place
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {A : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing A] [Nontrivial A] (φ : K →+* A)
/-- An embedding into a normed division ring defines a place of `K` -/
def NumberField.place : AbsoluteValue K ℝ :=
(IsAbsoluteValue.toAbsoluteValue (norm : A → ℝ)).comp φ.injective
@[simp]
theorem NumberField.place_apply (x : K) : (NumberField.place φ) x = norm (φ x) := rfl
end Place
namespace NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
open Complex NumberField
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : Type*} [Field k]
variable (K) in
/--
A (random) lift of the complex embedding `φ : k →+* ℂ` to an extension `K` of `k`.
-/
noncomputable def lift [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := by
letI := φ.toAlgebra
exact (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := k)).toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_algebraMap [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) :
(lift K φ).comp (algebraMap k K) = φ := by
unfold lift
letI := φ.toAlgebra
rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.comp_algebraMap_of_tower, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra']
@[simp]
theorem lift_algebraMap_apply [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) (x : k) :
lift K φ (algebraMap k K x) = φ x :=
RingHom.congr_fun (lift_comp_algebraMap φ) x
/-- The conjugate of a complex embedding as a complex embedding. -/
abbrev conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := star φ
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_coe_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (conjugate φ) x = conj (φ x) := rfl
theorem place_conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : place (conjugate φ) = place φ := by
ext; simp only [place_apply, norm_conj, conjugate_coe_eq]
/-- An embedding into `ℂ` is real if it is fixed by complex conjugation. -/
abbrev IsReal (φ : K →+* ℂ) : Prop := IsSelfAdjoint φ
theorem isReal_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal φ ↔ conjugate φ = φ := isSelfAdjoint_iff
theorem isReal_conjugate_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal (conjugate φ) ↔ IsReal φ :=
IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
/-- A real embedding as a ring homomorphism from `K` to `ℝ` . -/
def IsReal.embedding {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) : K →+* ℝ where
toFun x := (φ x).re
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_re]
map_mul' := by
simp only [Complex.conj_eq_iff_im.mp (RingHom.congr_fun hφ _), map_mul, mul_re,
mul_zero, tsub_zero, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, zero_re]
map_add' := by simp only [map_add, add_re, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem IsReal.coe_embedding_apply {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) (x : K) :
(hφ.embedding x : ℂ) = φ x := by
apply Complex.ext
· rfl
· rw [ofReal_im, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact RingHom.congr_fun hφ x
lemma IsReal.comp (f : k →+* K) {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) :
IsReal (φ.comp f) := by ext1 x; simpa using RingHom.congr_fun hφ (f x)
lemma isReal_comp_iff {f : k ≃+* K} {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (φ.comp (f : k →+* K)) ↔ IsReal φ :=
⟨fun H ↦ by convert H.comp f.symm.toRingHom; ext1; simp, IsReal.comp _⟩
lemma exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq [Algebra k K] [IsGalois k K] (φ ψ : K →+* ℂ)
(h : φ.comp (algebraMap k K) = ψ.comp (algebraMap k K)) :
∃ σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K, φ.comp σ.symm = ψ := by
letI := (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)).toAlgebra
letI := φ.toAlgebra
have : IsScalarTower k K ℂ := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
let ψ' : K →ₐ[k] ℂ := { ψ with commutes' := fun r ↦ (RingHom.congr_fun h r).symm }
use (AlgHom.restrictNormal' ψ' K).symm
ext1 x
exact AlgHom.restrictNormal_commutes ψ' K x
variable [Algebra k K] (φ : K →+* ℂ) (σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K)
/--
`IsConj φ σ` states that `σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K` is the conjugation under the embedding `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
-/
def IsConj : Prop := conjugate φ = φ.comp σ
variable {φ σ}
lemma IsConj.eq (h : IsConj φ σ) (x) : φ (σ x) = star (φ x) := RingHom.congr_fun h.symm x
lemma IsConj.ext {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) (h₂ : IsConj φ σ₂) : σ₁ = σ₂ :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun x ↦ φ.injective ((h₁.eq x).trans (h₂.eq x).symm)
lemma IsConj.ext_iff {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) : σ₁ = σ₂ ↔ IsConj φ σ₂ :=
⟨fun e ↦ e ▸ h₁, h₁.ext⟩
lemma IsConj.isReal_comp (h : IsConj φ σ) : IsReal (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)) := by
ext1 x
simp only [conjugate_coe_eq, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ← h.eq,
starRingEnd_apply, AlgEquiv.commutes]
lemma isConj_one_iff : IsConj φ (1 : K ≃ₐ[k] K) ↔ IsReal φ := Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsReal.isConjGal_one⟩ := ComplexEmbedding.isConj_one_iff
lemma IsConj.symm (hσ : IsConj φ σ) :
IsConj φ σ.symm := RingHom.ext fun x ↦ by simpa using congr_arg star (hσ.eq (σ.symm x))
lemma isConj_symm : IsConj φ σ.symm ↔ IsConj φ σ :=
⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
end NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
section InfinitePlace
open NumberField
variable {k : Type*} [Field k] (K : Type*) [Field K] {F : Type*} [Field F]
/-- An infinite place of a number field `K` is a place associated to a complex embedding. -/
def NumberField.InfinitePlace := { w : AbsoluteValue K ℝ // ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, place φ = w }
instance [NumberField K] : Nonempty (NumberField.InfinitePlace K) := Set.instNonemptyRange _
variable {K}
/-- Return the infinite place defined by a complex embedding `φ`. -/
noncomputable def NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) : NumberField.InfinitePlace K :=
⟨place φ, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩
namespace NumberField.InfinitePlace
open NumberField
instance {K : Type*} [Field K] : FunLike (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
coe w x := w.1 x
coe_injective' _ _ h := Subtype.eq (AbsoluteValue.ext fun x => congr_fun h x)
lemma coe_apply {K : Type*} [Field K] (v : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
v x = v.1 x := rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {K : Type*} [Field K] (v₁ v₂ : InfinitePlace K) (h : ∀ k, v₁ k = v₂ k) : v₁ = v₂ :=
Subtype.ext <| AbsoluteValue.ext h
instance : MonoidWithZeroHomClass (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
map_mul w _ _ := w.1.map_mul _ _
map_one w := w.1.map_one
map_zero w := w.1.map_zero
instance : NonnegHomClass (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
apply_nonneg w _ := w.1.nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem apply (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (mk φ) x = ‖φ x‖ := rfl
/-- For an infinite place `w`, return an embedding `φ` such that `w = infinite_place φ` . -/
noncomputable def embedding (w : InfinitePlace K) : K →+* ℂ := w.2.choose
@[simp]
theorem mk_embedding (w : InfinitePlace K) : mk (embedding w) = w := Subtype.ext w.2.choose_spec
@[simp]
theorem mk_conjugate_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) : mk (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ) = mk φ := by
refine DFunLike.ext _ _ (fun x => ?_)
rw [apply, apply, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq, Complex.norm_conj]
theorem norm_embedding_eq (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
‖(embedding w) x‖ = w x := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← mk_embedding w]
rfl
theorem eq_iff_eq (x : K) (r : ℝ) : (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x = r) ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ = r :=
⟨fun hw φ => hw (mk φ), by rintro hφ ⟨w, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩; exact hφ φ⟩
theorem le_iff_le (x : K) (r : ℝ) : (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x ≤ r) ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r :=
⟨fun hw φ => hw (mk φ), by rintro hφ ⟨w, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩; exact hφ φ⟩
theorem pos_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} {x : K} : 0 < w x ↔ x ≠ 0 := AbsoluteValue.pos_iff w.1
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_iff {φ ψ : K →+* ℂ} : mk φ = mk ψ ↔ φ = ψ ∨ ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ = ψ := by
constructor
· -- We prove that the map ψ ∘ φ⁻¹ between φ(K) and ℂ is uniform continuous, thus it is either the
-- inclusion or the complex conjugation using `Complex.uniformContinuous_ringHom_eq_id_or_conj`
intro h₀
obtain ⟨j, hiφ⟩ := (φ.injective).hasLeftInverse
let ι := RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse hiφ
have hlip : LipschitzWith 1 (RingHom.comp ψ ι.symm.toRingHom) := by
change LipschitzWith 1 (ψ ∘ ι.symm)
apply LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul
intro x y
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, NormedField.dist_eq, Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply,
← map_sub, ← map_sub]
apply le_of_eq
suffices ‖φ (ι.symm (x - y))‖ = ‖ψ (ι.symm (x - y))‖ by
rw [← this, ← RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse_apply hiφ _, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply ι _]
rfl
exact congrFun (congrArg (↑) h₀) _
cases
Complex.uniformContinuous_ringHom_eq_id_or_conj φ.fieldRange hlip.uniformContinuous with
| inl h =>
left; ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← hiφ x]
exact (congrFun h (ι x)).symm
| inr h =>
right; ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← hiφ x]
exact (congrFun h (ι x)).symm
· rintro (⟨h⟩ | ⟨h⟩)
· exact congr_arg mk h
· rw [← mk_conjugate_eq]
exact congr_arg mk h
/-- An infinite place is real if it is defined by a real embedding. -/
def IsReal (w : InfinitePlace K) : Prop := ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ ∧ mk φ = w
/-- An infinite place is complex if it is defined by a complex (ie. not real) embedding. -/
def IsComplex (w : InfinitePlace K) : Prop := ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ ∧ mk φ = w
theorem embedding_mk_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) :
embedding (mk φ) = φ ∨ embedding (mk φ) = ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ := by
rw [@eq_comm _ _ φ, @eq_comm _ _ (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ), ← mk_eq_iff, mk_embedding]
@[simp]
theorem embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ) :
embedding (mk φ) = φ := by
have := embedding_mk_eq φ
rwa [ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp h, or_self] at this
theorem isReal_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsReal w ↔ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal (embedding w) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨embedding w, h, mk_embedding w⟩⟩
rintro ⟨φ, ⟨hφ, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ]
theorem isComplex_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsComplex w ↔ ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal (embedding w) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨embedding w, h, mk_embedding w⟩⟩
rintro ⟨φ, ⟨hφ, rfl⟩⟩
contrapose! hφ
cases mk_eq_iff.mp (mk_embedding (mk φ)) with
| inl h => rwa [h] at hφ
| inr h => rwa [← ComplexEmbedding.isReal_conjugate_iff, h] at hφ
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_embedding_eq_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (h : IsReal w) :
ComplexEmbedding.conjugate (embedding w) = embedding w :=
ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mpr (isReal_iff.mp h)
@[simp]
theorem not_isReal_iff_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} : ¬IsReal w ↔ IsComplex w := by
rw [isComplex_iff, isReal_iff]
@[simp]
theorem not_isComplex_iff_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} : ¬IsComplex w ↔ IsReal w := by
rw [isComplex_iff, isReal_iff, not_not]
theorem isReal_or_isComplex (w : InfinitePlace K) : IsReal w ∨ IsComplex w := by
rw [← not_isReal_iff_isComplex]; exact em _
theorem ne_of_isReal_isComplex {w w' : InfinitePlace K} (h : IsReal w) (h' : IsComplex w') :
w ≠ w' := fun h_eq ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr h' (h_eq ▸ h)
variable (K) in
theorem disjoint_isReal_isComplex :
Disjoint {(w : InfinitePlace K) | IsReal w} {(w : InfinitePlace K) | IsComplex w} :=
Set.disjoint_iff.2 <| fun _ hw ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex.2 hw.2 hw.1
/-- The real embedding associated to a real infinite place. -/
noncomputable def embedding_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) : K →+* ℝ :=
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.embedding (isReal_iff.mp hw)
@[simp]
theorem embedding_of_isReal_apply {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : K) :
((embedding_of_isReal hw) x : ℂ) = (embedding w) x :=
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.coe_embedding_apply (isReal_iff.mp hw) x
theorem norm_embedding_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : K) :
‖embedding_of_isReal hw x‖ = w x := by
rw [← norm_embedding_eq, ← embedding_of_isReal_apply hw, Complex.norm_real]
@[simp]
theorem isReal_of_mk_isReal {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : IsReal (mk φ)) :
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ := by
contrapose! h
rw [not_isReal_iff_isComplex]
exact ⟨φ, h, rfl⟩
lemma isReal_mk_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (mk φ) ↔ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ :=
⟨isReal_of_mk_isReal, fun H ↦ ⟨_, H, rfl⟩⟩
lemma isComplex_mk_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsComplex (mk φ) ↔ ¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ :=
not_isReal_iff_isComplex.symm.trans isReal_mk_iff.not
@[simp]
theorem not_isReal_of_mk_isComplex {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : IsComplex (mk φ)) :
¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ := by rwa [← isComplex_mk_iff]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of an infinite place, that is the number of distinct complex embeddings that
define it, see `card_filter_mk_eq`. -/
noncomputable def mult (w : InfinitePlace K) : ℕ := if (IsReal w) then 1 else 2
@[simp]
theorem mult_isReal (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w}) :
mult w.1 = 1 := by
rw [mult, if_pos w.prop]
@[simp]
theorem mult_isComplex (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
mult w.1 = 2 := by
rw [mult, if_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr w.prop)]
theorem mult_pos {w : InfinitePlace K} : 0 < mult w := by
rw [mult]
split_ifs <;> norm_num
@[simp]
theorem mult_ne_zero {w : InfinitePlace K} : mult w ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt mult_pos
theorem mult_coe_ne_zero {w : InfinitePlace K} : (mult w : ℝ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr mult_ne_zero
theorem one_le_mult {w : InfinitePlace K} : (1 : ℝ) ≤ mult w := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le]
exact mult_pos
open scoped Classical in
theorem card_filter_mk_eq [NumberField K] (w : InfinitePlace K) : #{φ | mk φ = w} = mult w := by
conv_lhs =>
congr; congr; ext
rw [← mk_embedding w, mk_eq_iff, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate, star_involutive.eq_iff]
simp_rw [Finset.filter_or, Finset.filter_eq' _ (embedding w),
Finset.filter_eq' _ (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate (embedding w)),
Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, mult]
split_ifs with hw
· rw [ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp (isReal_iff.mp hw), Finset.union_idempotent,
Finset.card_singleton]
· refine Finset.card_pair ?_
rwa [Ne, eq_comm, ← ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff, ← isReal_iff]
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance NumberField.InfinitePlace.fintype [NumberField K] :
Fintype (InfinitePlace K) := Set.fintypeRange _
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_mul_prod {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] [NumberField K] (f : InfinitePlace K → α) :
∏ w, f w = (∏ w : {w // IsReal w}, f w.1) * (∏ w : {w // IsComplex w}, f w.1) := by
rw [← Equiv.prod_comp (Equiv.subtypeEquivRight (fun _ ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex))]
simp [Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype]
theorem sum_mult_eq [NumberField K] :
∑ w : InfinitePlace K, mult w = Module.finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [← Embeddings.card K ℂ, Fintype.card, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, ← Finset.univ.sum_fiberwise
(fun φ => InfinitePlace.mk φ)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl
(fun _ _ => by rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, card_filter_mk_eq])
/-- The map from real embeddings to real infinite places as an equiv -/
noncomputable def mkReal :
{ φ : K →+* ℂ // ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ } ≃ { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } := by
refine (Equiv.ofBijective (fun φ => ⟨mk φ, ?_⟩) ⟨fun φ ψ h => ?_, fun w => ?_⟩)
· exact ⟨φ, φ.prop, rfl⟩
· rwa [Subtype.mk.injEq, mk_eq_iff, ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp φ.prop, or_self,
← Subtype.ext_iff] at h
· exact ⟨⟨embedding w, isReal_iff.mp w.prop⟩, by simp⟩
/-- The map from nonreal embeddings to complex infinite places -/
noncomputable def mkComplex :
{ φ : K →+* ℂ // ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ } → { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } :=
Subtype.map mk fun φ hφ => ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mkReal_coe (φ : { φ : K →+* ℂ // ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ }) :
(mkReal φ : InfinitePlace K) = mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkComplex_coe (φ : { φ : K →+* ℂ // ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ }) :
(mkComplex φ : InfinitePlace K) = mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) := rfl
section NumberField
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The infinite part of the product formula : for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`. -/
theorem prod_eq_abs_norm (x : K) :
∏ w : InfinitePlace K, w x ^ mult w = abs (Algebra.norm ℚ x) := by
classical
convert (congr_arg (‖·‖) (@Algebra.norm_eq_prod_embeddings ℚ _ _ _ _ ℂ _ _ _ _ _ x)).symm
· rw [norm_prod, ← Fintype.prod_equiv RingHom.equivRatAlgHom (fun f => ‖f x‖)
(fun φ => ‖φ x‖) fun _ => by simp [RingHom.equivRatAlgHom_apply]]
rw [← Finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.univ mk (fun φ => ‖φ x‖)]
have (w : InfinitePlace K) (φ) (hφ : φ ∈ ({φ | mk φ = w} : Finset _)) :
‖φ x‖ = w x := by rw [← (Finset.mem_filter.mp hφ).2, apply]
simp_rw [Finset.prod_congr rfl (this _), Finset.prod_const, card_filter_mk_eq]
· rw [eq_ratCast, Rat.cast_abs, ← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← Complex.norm_real, Complex.ofReal_ratCast]
theorem one_le_of_lt_one {w : InfinitePlace K} {a : (𝓞 K)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ≠ w → z a < 1) : 1 ≤ w a := by
suffices (1 : ℝ) ≤ |Algebra.norm ℚ (a : K)| by
contrapose! this
rw [← InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm, ← Finset.prod_const_one]
| refine Finset.prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty (fun _ _ ↦ ?_) (fun z _ ↦ ?_) Finset.univ_nonempty
· exact pow_pos (pos_iff.mpr ((Subalgebra.coe_eq_zero _).not.mpr ha)) _
· refine pow_lt_one₀ (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_ (by rw [mult]; split_ifs <;> norm_num)
by_cases hz : z = w
· rwa [hz]
· exact h hz
rw [← Algebra.coe_norm_int, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_abs, Rat.cast_intCast, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs (Algebra.norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha)
open scoped IntermediateField in
theorem _root_.NumberField.is_primitive_element_of_infinitePlace_lt {x : 𝓞 K}
{w : InfinitePlace K} (h₁ : x ≠ 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃w'⦄, w' ≠ w → w' x < 1)
(h₃ : IsReal w ∨ |(w.embedding x).re| < 1) : ℚ⟮(x : K)⟯ = ⊤ := by
rw [Field.primitive_element_iff_algHom_eq_of_eval ℚ ℂ ?_ _ w.embedding.toRatAlgHom]
· intro ψ hψ
have h : 1 ≤ w x := one_le_of_lt_one h₁ h₂
have main : w = InfinitePlace.mk ψ.toRingHom := by
simp at hψ
rw [← norm_embedding_eq, hψ] at h
contrapose! h
exact h₂ h.symm
rw [(mk_embedding w).symm, mk_eq_iff] at main
cases h₃ with
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Embeddings.lean | 553 | 575 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Integral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
/-!
# Minimal polynomials on an algebra over a field
This file specializes the theory of minpoly to the setting of field extensions
and derives some well-known properties, amongst which the fact that minimal polynomials
are irreducible, and uniquely determined by their defining property.
-/
open Polynomial Set Function minpoly
namespace minpoly
variable {A B : Type*}
variable (A) [Field A]
section Ring
variable [Ring B] [Algebra A B] (x : B)
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a nonzero polynomial `p`, then the degree of `p` is at least the
degree of the minimal polynomial of `x`. See also `minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed.degree_le_of_ne_zero`
which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem degree_le_of_ne_zero {p : A[X]} (pnz : p ≠ 0) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p :=
calc
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) :=
min A x (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv pnz) (by simp [hp])
_ = degree p := degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv p pnz
theorem ne_zero_of_finite (e : B) [FiniteDimensional A B] : minpoly A e ≠ 0 :=
minpoly.ne_zero <| .of_finite A _
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` is uniquely characterized by its defining property:
if there is another monic polynomial of minimal degree that has `x` as a root, then this polynomial
is equal to the minimal polynomial of `x`. See also `minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed.Minpoly.unique`
which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem unique {p : A[X]} (pmonic : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0)
(pmin : ∀ q : A[X], q.Monic → Polynomial.aeval x q = 0 → degree p ≤ degree q) :
p = minpoly A x := by
have hx : IsIntegral A x := ⟨p, pmonic, hp⟩
symm; apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
by_contra hnz
apply degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz (by simp [hp]) |>.not_lt
apply degree_sub_lt _ (minpoly.ne_zero hx)
· rw [(monic hx).leadingCoeff, pmonic.leadingCoeff]
· exact le_antisymm (min A x pmonic hp) (pmin (minpoly A x) (monic hx) (aeval A x))
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a polynomial `p`, then the minimal polynomial of `x` divides `p`.
See also `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd` which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for
stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem dvd {p : A[X]} (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) : minpoly A x ∣ p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp only [hp0, dvd_zero]
have hx : IsIntegral A x := IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨p, hp0, hp⟩
rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (monic hx)]
by_contra hnz
apply degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz
((aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root (monic hx) (aeval _ _)).trans hp) |>.not_lt
exact degree_modByMonic_lt _ (monic hx)
variable {A x} in
lemma dvd_iff {p : A[X]} : minpoly A x ∣ p ↔ Polynomial.aeval x p = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ ↦ by rw [hq, map_mul, aeval, zero_mul], minpoly.dvd A x⟩
theorem isRadical [IsReduced B] : IsRadical (minpoly A x) := fun n p dvd ↦ by
rw [dvd_iff] at dvd ⊢; rw [map_pow] at dvd; exact IsReduced.eq_zero _ ⟨n, dvd⟩
theorem dvd_map_of_isScalarTower (A K : Type*) {R : Type*} [CommRing A] [Field K] [Ring R]
[Algebra A K] [Algebra A R] [Algebra K R] [IsScalarTower A K R] (x : R) :
minpoly K x ∣ (minpoly A x).map (algebraMap A K) := by
refine minpoly.dvd K x ?_
rw [aeval_map_algebraMap, minpoly.aeval]
theorem dvd_map_of_isScalarTower' (R : Type*) {S : Type*} (K L : Type*) [CommRing R]
[CommRing S] [Field K] [Ring L] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R K] [Algebra S L] [Algebra K L]
[Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] [IsScalarTower R S L] (s : S) :
minpoly K (algebraMap S L s) ∣ map (algebraMap R K) (minpoly R s) := by
apply minpoly.dvd K (algebraMap S L s)
rw [← map_aeval_eq_aeval_map, minpoly.aeval, map_zero]
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
/-- If `y` is a conjugate of `x` over a field `K`, then it is a conjugate over a subring `R`. -/
theorem aeval_of_isScalarTower (R : Type*) {K T U : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [CommRing T]
[Algebra R K] [Algebra K T] [Algebra R T] [IsScalarTower R K T] [CommSemiring U] [Algebra K U]
[Algebra R U] [IsScalarTower R K U] (x : T) (y : U)
(hy : Polynomial.aeval y (minpoly K x) = 0) : Polynomial.aeval y (minpoly R x) = 0 :=
aeval_map_algebraMap K y (minpoly R x) ▸
eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero (algebraMap K U) y
(minpoly.dvd_map_of_isScalarTower R K x) hy
/-- If a subfield `F` of `E` contains all the coefficients of `minpoly E a`, then
`minpoly F a` maps to `minpoly E a` via `algebraMap F E`. -/
theorem map_algebraMap {F E A : Type*} [Field F] [Field E] [CommRing A]
[Algebra F E] [Algebra E A] [Algebra F A] [IsScalarTower F E A]
{a : A} (ha : IsIntegral F a) (h : minpoly E a ∈ lifts (algebraMap F E)) :
(minpoly F a).map (algebraMap F E) = minpoly E a := by
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le (minpoly.monic ha.tower_top)
((algebraMap F E).injective.monic_map_iff.mp <| minpoly.monic ha)
(minpoly.dvd E a (by simp)) ?_
obtain ⟨g, hg, hgdeg, hgmon⟩ := lifts_and_natDegree_eq_and_monic h (minpoly.monic ha.tower_top)
rw [natDegree_map, ← hgdeg]
refine natDegree_le_of_dvd (minpoly.dvd F a ?_) hgmon.ne_zero
rw [← aeval_map_algebraMap A, IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq F E A, ← coe_mapRingHom,
← mapRingHom_comp, RingHom.comp_apply, coe_mapRingHom, coe_mapRingHom, hg,
aeval_map_algebraMap, minpoly.aeval]
/-- See also `minpoly.ker_eval` which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for
stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
@[simp]
lemma ker_aeval_eq_span_minpoly :
RingHom.ker (Polynomial.aeval x) = A[X] ∙ minpoly A x := by
ext p
simp_rw [RingHom.mem_ker, ← minpoly.dvd_iff, Submodule.mem_span_singleton,
dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, smul_eq_mul, eq_comm (a := p)]
variable {A x}
theorem eq_of_irreducible_of_monic [Nontrivial B] {p : A[X]} (hp1 : Irreducible p)
(hp2 : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) (hp3 : p.Monic) : p = minpoly A x :=
let ⟨_, hq⟩ := dvd A x hp2
eq_of_monic_of_associated hp3 (monic ⟨p, ⟨hp3, hp2⟩⟩) <|
mul_one (minpoly A x) ▸ hq.symm ▸ Associated.mul_left _
(associated_one_iff_isUnit.2 <| (hp1.isUnit_or_isUnit hq).resolve_left <| not_isUnit A x)
theorem eq_iff_aeval_eq_zero [Nontrivial B] {p : A[X]} (irr : Irreducible p) (monic : p.Monic) :
p = minpoly A x ↔ Polynomial.aeval x p = 0 :=
⟨(· ▸ aeval A x), (eq_of_irreducible_of_monic irr · monic)⟩
theorem eq_iff_aeval_minpoly_eq_zero [IsDomain B] {C} [Ring C] [Algebra A C] [Nontrivial C]
{b : B} (h : IsIntegral A b) {c : C} :
minpoly A b = minpoly A c ↔ Polynomial.aeval c (minpoly A b) = 0 :=
eq_iff_aeval_eq_zero (irreducible h) (monic h)
theorem eq_of_irreducible [Nontrivial B] {p : A[X]} (hp1 : Irreducible p)
(hp2 : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) : p * C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹ = minpoly A x := by
have : p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp1.ne_zero
apply eq_of_irreducible_of_monic
· exact Associated.irreducible ⟨⟨C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹, C p.leadingCoeff,
by rwa [← C_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀, C_1], by rwa [← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀, C_1]⟩, rfl⟩ hp1
· rw [aeval_mul, hp2, zero_mul]
· rwa [Polynomial.Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, mul_inv_cancel₀]
theorem add_algebraMap {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] (x : B)
(a : A) : minpoly A (x + algebraMap A B a) = (minpoly A x).comp (X - C a) := by
by_cases hx : IsIntegral A x
· refine (minpoly.unique _ _ ((minpoly.monic hx).comp_X_sub_C _) ?_ fun q qmo hq => ?_).symm
· simp [aeval_comp]
· have : (Polynomial.aeval x) (q.comp (X + C a)) = 0 := by simpa [aeval_comp] using hq
have H := minpoly.min A x (qmo.comp_X_add_C _) this
rw [degree_eq_natDegree qmo.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree ((minpoly.monic hx).comp_X_sub_C _).ne_zero, natDegree_comp,
natDegree_X_sub_C, mul_one]
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree (minpoly.ne_zero hx),
degree_eq_natDegree (qmo.comp_X_add_C _).ne_zero, natDegree_comp,
natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one] at H
· rw [minpoly.eq_zero hx, minpoly.eq_zero, zero_comp]
refine fun h ↦ hx ?_
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using IsIntegral.sub h (isIntegral_algebraMap (x := a))
theorem sub_algebraMap {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] (x : B)
(a : A) : minpoly A (x - algebraMap A B a) = (minpoly A x).comp (X + C a) := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_algebraMap x (-a)
theorem neg {B : Type*} [Ring B] [Algebra A B] (x : B) :
minpoly A (- x) = (-1) ^ (natDegree (minpoly A x)) * (minpoly A x).comp (- X) := by
by_cases hx : IsIntegral A x
· refine (minpoly.unique _ _ ((minpoly.monic hx).neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X)
?_ fun q qmo hq => ?_).symm
· simp [aeval_comp]
· have : (Polynomial.aeval x) ((-1) ^ q.natDegree * q.comp (- X)) = 0 := by
simpa [aeval_comp] using hq
have H := minpoly.min A x qmo.neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X this
have n1 := ((minpoly.monic hx).neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X).ne_zero
have n2 := qmo.neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X.ne_zero
rw [degree_eq_natDegree qmo.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree n1, natDegree_mul (by simp) (right_ne_zero_of_mul n1), natDegree_comp]
rw [degree_eq_natDegree (minpoly.ne_zero hx),
degree_eq_natDegree qmo.neg_one_pow_natDegree_mul_comp_neg_X.ne_zero,
natDegree_mul (by simp) (right_ne_zero_of_mul n2), natDegree_comp] at H
simpa using H
· rw [minpoly.eq_zero hx, minpoly.eq_zero, zero_comp]
· simp only [natDegree_zero, pow_zero, mul_zero]
· exact IsIntegral.neg_iff.not.mpr hx
section AlgHomFintype
open scoped Classical in
/-- A technical finiteness result. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.subtypeProd {E : Type*} {X : Set E} (hX : X.Finite) {L : Type*}
(F : E → Multiset L) : Fintype (∀ x : X, { l : L // l ∈ F x }) :=
@Pi.instFintype _ _ _ (Finite.fintype hX) _
variable (F E K : Type*) [Field F] [Ring E] [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [Algebra F E] [Algebra F K]
[FiniteDimensional F E]
/-- Function from Hom_K(E,L) to pi type Π (x : basis), roots of min poly of x -/
def rootsOfMinPolyPiType (φ : E →ₐ[F] K)
(x : range (Module.finBasis F E : _ → E)) :
{ l : K // l ∈ (minpoly F x.1).aroots K } :=
⟨φ x, by
rw [mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero_of_finite F x.val),
← aeval_def, aeval_algHom_apply, minpoly.aeval, map_zero]⟩
theorem aux_inj_roots_of_min_poly : Injective (rootsOfMinPolyPiType F E K) := by
intro f g h
-- needs explicit coercion on the RHS
suffices (f : E →ₗ[F] K) = (g : E →ₗ[F] K) by rwa [DFunLike.ext'_iff] at this ⊢
rw [funext_iff] at h
exact LinearMap.ext_on (Module.finBasis F E).span_eq fun e he =>
Subtype.ext_iff.mp (h ⟨e, he⟩)
/-- Given field extensions `E/F` and `K/F`, with `E/F` finite, there are finitely many `F`-algebra
homomorphisms `E →ₐ[K] K`. -/
noncomputable instance AlgHom.fintype : Fintype (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
@Fintype.ofInjective _ _
(Fintype.subtypeProd (finite_range (Module.finBasis F E)) fun e =>
(minpoly F e).aroots K)
_ (aux_inj_roots_of_min_poly F E K)
end AlgHomFintype
variable (B) [Nontrivial B]
/-- If `B/K` is a nontrivial algebra over a field, and `x` is an element of `K`,
| then the minimal polynomial of `algebraMap K B x` is `X - C x`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C (a : A) : minpoly A (algebraMap A B a) = X - C a :=
eq_X_sub_C_of_algebraMap_inj a (algebraMap A B).injective
theorem eq_X_sub_C' (a : A) : minpoly A a = X - C a :=
eq_X_sub_C A a
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/Field.lean | 238 | 243 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
/-!
# Basic results on subgroups
We prove basic results on the definitions of subgroups. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid
homomorphisms.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid Multiset Ring
open Function
open scoped Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
end SubgroupClass
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
variable {k : Set G}
open Set
variable {N : Type*} [Group N] {P : Type*} [Group P]
/-- Given `Subgroup`s `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K` as a subgroup of `G × N`. -/
@[to_additive prod
"Given `AddSubgroup`s `H`, `K` of `AddGroup`s `A`, `B` respectively, `H × K`
as an `AddSubgroup` of `A × B`."]
def prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) : Subgroup (G × N) :=
{ Submonoid.prod H.toSubmonoid K.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun hx => ⟨H.inv_mem' hx.1, K.inv_mem' hx.2⟩ }
@[to_additive coe_prod]
theorem coe_prod (H : Subgroup G) (K : Subgroup N) :
(H.prod K : Set (G × N)) = (H : Set G) ×ˢ (K : Set N) :=
rfl
@[to_additive mem_prod]
theorem mem_prod {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {p : G × N} : p ∈ H.prod K ↔ p.1 ∈ H ∧ p.2 ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
open scoped Relator in
@[to_additive prod_mono]
theorem prod_mono : ((· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·) ⇒ (· ≤ ·)) (@prod G _ N _) (@prod G _ N _) :=
fun _s _s' hs _t _t' ht => Set.prod_mono hs ht
@[to_additive prod_mono_right]
theorem prod_mono_right (K : Subgroup G) : Monotone fun t : Subgroup N => K.prod t :=
prod_mono (le_refl K)
@[to_additive prod_mono_left]
theorem prod_mono_left (H : Subgroup N) : Monotone fun K : Subgroup G => K.prod H := fun _ _ hs =>
prod_mono hs (le_refl H)
@[to_additive prod_top]
theorem prod_top (K : Subgroup G) : K.prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = K.comap (MonoidHom.fst G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_fst]
@[to_additive top_prod]
theorem top_prod (H : Subgroup N) : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod H = H.comap (MonoidHom.snd G N) :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_prod, MonoidHom.coe_snd]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) top_prod_top]
theorem top_prod_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).prod (⊤ : Subgroup N) = ⊤ :=
(top_prod _).trans <| comap_top _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) bot_prod_bot]
theorem bot_prod_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).prod (⊥ : Subgroup N) = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias _root_.AddSubgroup.bot_sum_bot := AddSubgroup.bot_prod_bot
@[to_additive le_prod_iff]
theorem le_prod_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
J ≤ H.prod K ↔ map (MonoidHom.fst G N) J ≤ H ∧ map (MonoidHom.snd G N) J ≤ K := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.le_prod_iff
@[to_additive prod_le_iff]
theorem prod_le_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} {J : Subgroup (G × N)} :
H.prod K ≤ J ↔ map (MonoidHom.inl G N) H ≤ J ∧ map (MonoidHom.inr G N) K ≤ J := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le] using Submonoid.prod_le_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp) prod_eq_bot_iff]
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {H : Subgroup G} {K : Subgroup N} : H.prod K = ⊥ ↔ H = ⊥ ∧ K = ⊥ := by
simpa only [← Subgroup.toSubmonoid_inj] using Submonoid.prod_eq_bot_iff
|
@[to_additive closure_prod]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 144 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Quotient
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The shift on cochain complexes and on the homotopy category
In this file, we show that for any preadditive category `C`, the categories
`CochainComplex C ℤ` and `HomotopyCategory C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` are
equipped with a shift by `ℤ`.
We also show that if `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, then the functors
`F.mapHomologicalComplex (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` and
`F.mapHomotopyCategory (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` commute with the shift by `ℤ`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
universe v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
{D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
/-- The shift functor by `n : ℤ` on `CochainComplex C ℤ` which sends a cochain
complex `K` to the complex which is `K.X (i + n)` in degree `i`, and which
multiplies the differentials by `(-1)^n`. -/
@[simps]
def shiftFunctor (n : ℤ) : CochainComplex C ℤ ⥤ CochainComplex C ℤ where
obj K :=
{ X := fun i => K.X (i + n)
d := fun _ _ => n.negOnePow • K.d _ _
d_comp_d' := by
intros
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp, d_comp_d, smul_zero]
shape := fun i j hij => by
rw [K.shape, smul_zero]
intro hij'
apply hij
dsimp at hij' ⊢
omega }
map φ :=
{ f := fun _ => φ.f _
comm' := by
intros
dsimp
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, Hom.comm, Linear.units_smul_comp] }
map_id := by intros; rfl
map_comp := by intros; rfl
instance (n : ℤ) : (shiftFunctor C n).Additive where
variable {C}
/-- The canonical isomorphism `((shiftFunctor C n).obj K).X i ≅ K.X m` when `m = i + n`. -/
@[simp]
def shiftFunctorObjXIso (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n i m : ℤ) (hm : m = i + n) :
((shiftFunctor C n).obj K).X i ≅ K.X m := K.XIsoOfEq hm.symm
section
variable (C)
attribute [local simp] XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality
/-- The shift functor by `n` on `CochainComplex C ℤ` identifies to the identity
functor when `n = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftFunctorZero' (n : ℤ) (h : n = 0) :
shiftFunctor C n ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents
(fun i => K.shiftFunctorObjXIso _ _ _ (by omega))
(fun _ _ _ => by dsimp; simp [h])) (fun _ ↦ by ext; dsimp; simp)
/-- The compatibility of the shift functors on `CochainComplex C ℤ` with respect
to the addition of integers. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftFunctorAdd' (n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
shiftFunctor C n₁₂ ≅ shiftFunctor C n₁ ⋙ shiftFunctor C n₂ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents
(fun i => K.shiftFunctorObjXIso _ _ _ (by omega))
(fun _ _ _ => by
subst h
dsimp
simp only [add_comm n₁ n₂, Int.negOnePow_add, Linear.units_smul_comp,
Linear.comp_units_smul, d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom, smul_smul, XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d]))
(by intros; ext; dsimp; simp)
attribute [local simp] XIsoOfEq
instance : HasShift (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ := hasShiftMk _ _
{ F := shiftFunctor C
zero := shiftFunctorZero' C _ rfl
add := fun n₁ n₂ => shiftFunctorAdd' C n₁ n₂ _ rfl }
instance (n : ℤ) :
(CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (HomologicalComplex C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)) n).Additive :=
(inferInstance : (CochainComplex.shiftFunctor C n).Additive)
end
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_obj_X' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n p : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).obj K).X p = K.X (p + n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_map_f' {K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : K ⟶ L) (n p : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).map φ).f p = φ.f (p + n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_obj_d' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n i j : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).obj K).d i j =
n.negOnePow • K.d _ _ := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b n : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_comm a, add_assoc])).hom := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_hom_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b n : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_comm a, add_assoc])).hom := by
have : IsIso (((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n) := by
rw [shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f]
infer_instance
rw [← cancel_mono (((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n),
← comp_f, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, id_f, shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f]
simp only [XIsoOfEq, eqToIso.hom, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_inv_app_f' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b ab : ℤ) (h : a + b = ab) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd' (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b ab h).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [← h, add_assoc, add_comm a])).hom := by
subst h
rw [shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_hom_app_f' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b ab : ℤ) (h : a + b = ab) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd' (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b ab h).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [← h, add_assoc, add_comm a])).hom := by
subst h
rw [shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, shiftFunctorAdd_hom_app_f]
lemma shiftFunctorZero_inv_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_zero])).hom := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorZero_hom_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_zero])).hom := by
have : IsIso (((shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).inv.app K).f n) := by
rw [shiftFunctorZero_inv_app_f]
infer_instance
rw [← cancel_mono (((shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).inv.app K).f n), ← comp_f,
Iso.hom_inv_id_app, id_f, shiftFunctorZero_inv_app_f]
simp only [XIsoOfEq, eqToIso.hom, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl]
lemma XIsoOfEq_shift (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n : ℤ) {p q : ℤ} (hpq : p = q) :
(K⟦n⟧).XIsoOfEq hpq = K.XIsoOfEq (show p + n = q + n by rw [hpq]) := rfl
variable (C)
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_eq (a b c : ℤ) (h : a + b = c) :
CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd' (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b c h =
shiftFunctorAdd' C a b c h := by
ext
simp only [shiftFunctorAdd'_hom_app_f', XIsoOfEq, eqToIso.hom, shiftFunctorAdd'_hom_app_f]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_eq (a b : ℤ) :
CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b = shiftFunctorAdd' C a b _ rfl := by
rw [← CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, shiftFunctorAdd'_eq]
lemma shiftFunctorZero_eq :
CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ = shiftFunctorZero' C 0 rfl := by
| ext
rw [shiftFunctorZero_hom_app_f, shiftFunctorZero'_hom_app_f]
variable {C}
lemma shiftFunctorComm_hom_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b p : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorComm (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).hom.app K).f p =
(K.XIsoOfEq (show p + b + a = p + a + b
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/Shift.lean | 185 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
/-!
# Destuttering of Lists
This file proves theorems about `List.destutter` (in `Data.List.Defs`), which greedily removes all
non-related items that are adjacent in a list, e.g. `[2, 2, 3, 3, 2].destutter (≠) = [2, 3, 2]`.
Note that we make no guarantees of being the longest sublist with this property; e.g.,
`[123, 1, 2, 5, 543, 1000].destutter (<) = [123, 543, 1000]`, but a longer ascending chain could be
`[1, 2, 5, 543, 1000]`.
## Main statements
* `List.destutter_sublist`: `l.destutter` is a sublist of `l`.
* `List.destutter_is_chain'`: `l.destutter` satisfies `Chain' R`.
* Analogies of these theorems for `List.destutter'`, which is the `destutter` equivalent of `Chain`.
## Tags
adjacent, chain, duplicates, remove, list, stutter, destutter
-/
open Function
variable {α β : Type*} (l l₁ l₂ : List α) (R : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel R] {a b : α}
variable {R₂ : β → β → Prop} [DecidableRel R₂]
namespace List
@[simp]
theorem destutter'_nil : destutter' R a [] = [a] :=
rfl
theorem destutter'_cons :
(b :: l).destutter' R a = if R a b then a :: destutter' R b l else destutter' R a l :=
rfl
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem destutter'_cons_pos (h : R b a) : (a :: l).destutter' R b = b :: l.destutter' R a := by
| rw [destutter', if_pos h]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Destutter.lean | 48 | 49 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Counit
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Invertible
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Defs
/-!
# Witt vectors
This file verifies that the ring operations on `WittVector p R`
satisfy the axioms of a commutative ring.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector.map`: lifts a ring homomorphism `R →+* S` to a ring homomorphism `𝕎 R →+* 𝕎 S`.
* `WittVector.ghostComponent n x`: evaluates the `n`th Witt polynomial
on the first `n` coefficients of `x`, producing a value in `R`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
* `WittVector.ghostMap`: a ring homomorphism `𝕎 R →+* (ℕ → R)`, obtained by packaging
all the ghost components together.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, then the ghost map is an equivalence,
which we use to define the ring operations on `𝕎 R`.
* `WittVector.CommRing`: the ring structure induced by the ghost components.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## Implementation details
As we prove that the ghost components respect the ring operations, we face a number of repetitive
proofs. To avoid duplicating code we factor these proofs into a custom tactic, only slightly more
powerful than a tactic macro. This tactic is not particularly useful outside of its applications
in this file.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
open MvPolynomial Function
variable {p : ℕ} {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
local notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- type as `\bbW`
open scoped Witt
namespace WittVector
/-- `f : α → β` induces a map from `𝕎 α` to `𝕎 β` by applying `f` componentwise.
If `f` is a ring homomorphism, then so is `f`, see `WittVector.map f`. -/
def mapFun (f : α → β) : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β := fun x => mk _ (f ∘ x.coeff)
namespace mapFun
-- Porting note: switched the proof to tactic mode. I think that `ext` was the issue.
theorem injective (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f) : Injective (mapFun f : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β) := by
intros _ _ h
ext p
exact hf (congr_arg (fun x => coeff x p) h :)
theorem surjective (f : α → β) (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (mapFun f : 𝕎 α → 𝕎 β) := fun x =>
⟨mk _ fun n => Classical.choose <| hf <| x.coeff n,
by ext n; simp only [mapFun, coeff_mk, comp_apply, Classical.choose_spec (hf (x.coeff n))]⟩
/-- Auxiliary tactic for showing that `mapFun` respects the ring operations. -/
-- porting note: a very crude port.
macro "map_fun_tac" : tactic => `(tactic| (
ext n
simp only [mapFun, mk, comp_apply, zero_coeff, map_zero,
-- Porting note: the lemmas on the next line do not have the `simp` tag in mathlib4
add_coeff, sub_coeff, mul_coeff, neg_coeff, nsmul_coeff, zsmul_coeff, pow_coeff,
peval, map_aeval, algebraMap_int_eq, coe_eval₂Hom] <;>
try { cases n <;> simp <;> done } <;> -- Porting note: this line solves `one`
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl <;>
ext ⟨i, k⟩ <;>
fin_cases i <;> rfl))
variable [Fact p.Prime]
-- Porting note: using `(x y : 𝕎 R)` instead of `(x y : WittVector p R)` produced sorries.
variable (f : R →+* S) (x y : WittVector p R)
-- and until `pow`.
-- We do not tag these lemmas as `@[simp]` because they will be bundled in `map` later on.
theorem zero : mapFun f (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := by map_fun_tac
theorem one : mapFun f (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := by map_fun_tac
theorem add : mapFun f (x + y) = mapFun f x + mapFun f y := by map_fun_tac
theorem sub : mapFun f (x - y) = mapFun f x - mapFun f y := by map_fun_tac
theorem mul : mapFun f (x * y) = mapFun f x * mapFun f y := by map_fun_tac
theorem neg : mapFun f (-x) = -mapFun f x := by map_fun_tac
theorem nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : WittVector p R) : mapFun f (n • x) = n • mapFun f x := by map_fun_tac
theorem zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : WittVector p R) : mapFun f (z • x) = z • mapFun f x := by map_fun_tac
theorem pow (n : ℕ) : mapFun f (x ^ n) = mapFun f x ^ n := by map_fun_tac
theorem natCast (n : ℕ) : mapFun f (n : 𝕎 R) = n :=
show mapFun f n.unaryCast = (n : WittVector p S) by
induction n <;> simp [*, Nat.unaryCast, add, one, zero] <;> rfl
theorem intCast (n : ℤ) : mapFun f (n : 𝕎 R) = n :=
show mapFun f n.castDef = (n : WittVector p S) by
cases n <;> simp [*, Int.castDef, add, one, neg, zero, natCast] <;> rfl
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean | 123 | 123 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Transvections
Transvections are matrices of the form `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`, where `stdBasisMatrix i j c`
is the basic matrix with a `c` at position `(i, j)`. Multiplying by such a transvection on the left
(resp. on the right) amounts to adding `c` times the `j`-th row to the `i`-th row
(resp `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column). Therefore, they are useful to present
algorithms operating on rows and columns.
Transvections are a special case of *elementary matrices* (according to most references, these also
contain the matrices exchanging rows, and the matrices multiplying a row by a constant).
We show that, over a field, any matrix can be written as `L * D * L'`, where `L` and `L'` are
products of transvections and `D` is diagonal. In other words, one can reduce a matrix to diagonal
form by operations on its rows and columns, a variant of Gauss' pivot algorithm.
## Main definitions and results
* `transvection i j c` is the matrix equal to `1 + stdBasisMatrix i j c`.
* `TransvectionStruct n R` is a structure containing the data of `i, j, c` and a proof that
`i ≠ j`. These are often easier to manipulate than straight matrices, especially in inductive
arguments.
* `exists_list_transvec_mul_diagonal_mul_list_transvec` states that any matrix `M` over a field can
be written in the form `t_1 * ... * t_k * D * t'_1 * ... * t'_l`, where `D` is diagonal and
the `t_i`, `t'_j` are transvections.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction` shows that a property which is true for diagonal matrices and
transvections, and invariant under product, is true for all matrices.
* `diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero` is the same statement over invertible matrices.
## Implementation details
The proof of the reduction results is done inductively on the size of the matrices, reducing an
`(r + 1) × (r + 1)` matrix to a matrix whose last row and column are zeroes, except possibly for
the last diagonal entry. This step is done as follows.
If all the coefficients on the last row and column are zero, there is nothing to do. Otherwise,
one can put a nonzero coefficient in the last diagonal entry by a row or column operation, and then
subtract this last diagonal entry from the other entries in the last row and column to make them
vanish.
This step is done in the type `Fin r ⊕ Unit`, where `Fin r` is useful to choose arbitrarily some
order in which we cancel the coefficients, and the sum structure is useful to use the formalism of
block matrices.
To proceed with the induction, we reindex our matrices to reduce to the above situation.
-/
universe u₁ u₂
namespace Matrix
variable (n p : Type*) (R : Type u₂) {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p]
variable [CommRing R]
section Transvection
variable {R n} (i j : n)
/-- The transvection matrix `transvection i j c` is equal to the identity plus `c` at position
`(i, j)`. Multiplying by it on the left (as in `transvection i j c * M`) corresponds to adding
`c` times the `j`-th row of `M` to its `i`-th row. Multiplying by it on the right corresponds
to adding `c` times the `i`-th column to the `j`-th column. -/
def transvection (c : R) : Matrix n n R :=
1 + Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c
@[simp]
theorem transvection_zero : transvection i j (0 : R) = 1 := by simp [transvection]
section
/-- A transvection matrix is obtained from the identity by adding `c` times the `j`-th row to
the `i`-th row. -/
theorem updateRow_eq_transvection [Finite n] (c : R) :
updateRow (1 : Matrix n n R) i ((1 : Matrix n n R) i + c • (1 : Matrix n n R) j) =
transvection i j c := by
cases nonempty_fintype n
ext a b
by_cases ha : i = a
· by_cases hb : j = b
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, transvection, add_apply, StdBasisMatrix.apply_same]
· simp only [ha, updateRow_self, Pi.add_apply, one_apply, Pi.smul_apply, hb, ↓reduceIte,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, add_zero, transvection, add_apply, and_false, not_false_eq_true,
StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne]
· simp only [updateRow_ne, transvection, ha, Ne.symm ha, StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne, add_zero,
Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Ne, not_false_iff, DMatrix.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
mul_zero, false_and, add_apply]
variable [Fintype n]
theorem transvection_mul_transvection_same (h : i ≠ j) (c d : R) :
transvection i j c * transvection i j d = transvection i j (c + d) := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, Matrix.mul_add, h, h.symm, add_smul, add_assoc,
stdBasisMatrix_add]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_same (b : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) i b = M i b + c * M j b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_same (a : n) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a j = M a j + c * M a i := by
simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem transvection_mul_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (ha : a ≠ i) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(transvection i j c * M) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.add_mul, ha]
@[simp]
theorem mul_transvection_apply_of_ne (a b : n) (hb : b ≠ j) (c : R) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M * transvection i j c) a b = M a b := by simp [transvection, Matrix.mul_add, hb]
@[simp]
theorem det_transvection_of_ne (h : i ≠ j) (c : R) : det (transvection i j c) = 1 := by
rw [← updateRow_eq_transvection i j, det_updateRow_add_smul_self _ h, det_one]
|
end
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Transvection.lean | 131 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
/-!
# Initial and principal segments
This file defines initial and principal segment embeddings. Though these definitions make sense for
arbitrary relations, they're intended for use with well orders.
An initial segment is simply a lower set, i.e. if `x` belongs to the range, then any `y < x` also
belongs to the range. A principal segment is a set of the form `Set.Iio x` for some `x`.
An initial segment embedding `r ≼i s` is an order embedding `r ↪ s` such that its range is an
initial segment. Likewise, a principal segment embedding `r ≺i s` has a principal segment for a
range.
## Main definitions
* `InitialSeg r s`: Type of initial segment embeddings of `r` into `s` , denoted by `r ≼i s`.
* `PrincipalSeg r s`: Type of principal segment embeddings of `r` into `s` , denoted by `r ≺i s`.
The lemmas `Ordinal.type_le_iff` and `Ordinal.type_lt_iff` tell us that `≼i` corresponds to the `≤`
relation on ordinals, while `≺i` corresponds to the `<` relation. This prompts us to think of
`PrincipalSeg` as a "strict" version of `InitialSeg`.
## Notations
These notations belong to the `InitialSeg` locale.
* `r ≼i s`: the type of initial segment embeddings of `r` into `s`.
* `r ≺i s`: the type of principal segment embeddings of `r` into `s`.
* `α ≤i β` is an abbreviation for `(· < ·) ≼i (· < ·)`.
* `α <i β` is an abbreviation for `(· < ·) ≺i (· < ·)`.
-/
/-! ### Initial segment embeddings -/
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
open Function
/-- If `r` is a relation on `α` and `s` in a relation on `β`, then `f : r ≼i s` is an order
embedding whose `Set.range` is a lower set. That is, whenever `b < f a` in `β` then `b` is in the
range of `f`. -/
structure InitialSeg {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends r ↪r s where
/-- The order embedding is an initial segment -/
mem_range_of_rel' : ∀ a b, s b (toRelEmbedding a) → b ∈ Set.range toRelEmbedding
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[InitialSeg] infixl:25 " ≼i " => InitialSeg
/-- An `InitialSeg` between the `<` relations of two types. -/
notation:25 α:24 " ≤i " β:25 => @InitialSeg α β (· < ·) (· < ·)
namespace InitialSeg
instance : Coe (r ≼i s) (r ↪r s) :=
⟨InitialSeg.toRelEmbedding⟩
instance : FunLike (r ≼i s) α β where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' := by
rintro ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ h
congr with x
exact congr_fun h x
instance : EmbeddingLike (r ≼i s) α β where
injective' f := f.inj'
instance : RelHomClass (r ≼i s) r s where
map_rel f := f.map_rel_iff.2
/-- An initial segment embedding between the `<` relations of two partial orders is an order
embedding. -/
def toOrderEmbedding [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] (f : α ≤i β) : α ↪o β :=
f.orderEmbeddingOfLTEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem toOrderEmbedding_apply [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] (f : α ≤i β) (x : α) :
f.toOrderEmbedding x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderEmbedding [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] (f : α ≤i β) :
(f.toOrderEmbedding : α → β) = f :=
rfl
instance [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] : OrderHomClass (α ≤i β) α β where
map_rel f := f.toOrderEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : r ≼i s} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe_fn (f : r ≼i s) : ((f : r ↪r s) : α → β) = f :=
rfl
theorem mem_range_of_rel (f : r ≼i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) → b ∈ Set.range f :=
f.mem_range_of_rel' _ _
theorem map_rel_iff {a b : α} (f : r ≼i s) : s (f a) (f b) ↔ r a b :=
f.map_rel_iff'
theorem inj (f : r ≼i s) {a b : α} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
f.toRelEmbedding.inj
theorem exists_eq_iff_rel (f : r ≼i s) {a : α} {b : β} : s b (f a) ↔ ∃ a', f a' = b ∧ r a' a :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases f.mem_range_of_rel h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
exact ⟨a', rfl, f.map_rel_iff.1 h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ f.map_rel_iff.2 h⟩
/-- A relation isomorphism is an initial segment embedding -/
@[simps!]
def _root_.RelIso.toInitialSeg (f : r ≃r s) : r ≼i s :=
⟨f, by simp⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias ofIso := RelIso.toInitialSeg
/-- The identity function shows that `≼i` is reflexive -/
@[refl]
protected def refl (r : α → α → Prop) : r ≼i r :=
(RelIso.refl r).toInitialSeg
instance (r : α → α → Prop) : Inhabited (r ≼i r) :=
⟨InitialSeg.refl r⟩
/-- Composition of functions shows that `≼i` is transitive -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i t) : r ≼i t :=
⟨f.1.trans g.1, fun a c h => by
simp only [RelEmbedding.coe_trans, coe_coe_fn, comp_apply] at h ⊢
rcases g.2 _ _ h with ⟨b, rfl⟩; have h := g.map_rel_iff.1 h
rcases f.2 _ _ h with ⟨a', rfl⟩; exact ⟨a', rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (x : α) : InitialSeg.refl r x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i t) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) :=
rfl
instance subsingleton_of_trichotomous_of_irrefl [IsTrichotomous β s] [IsIrrefl β s]
[IsWellFounded α r] : Subsingleton (r ≼i s) where
allEq f g := by
ext a
refine IsWellFounded.induction r a fun b IH =>
extensional_of_trichotomous_of_irrefl s fun x => ?_
rw [f.exists_eq_iff_rel, g.exists_eq_iff_rel]
exact exists_congr fun x => and_congr_left fun hx => IH _ hx ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Given a well order `s`, there is at most one initial segment embedding of `r` into `s`. -/
instance [IsWellOrder β s] : Subsingleton (r ≼i s) :=
⟨fun a => have := a.isWellFounded; Subsingleton.elim a⟩
protected theorem eq [IsWellOrder β s] (f g : r ≼i s) (a) : f a = g a := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f g]
theorem eq_relIso [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : r ≃r s) (a : α) : g a = f a :=
InitialSeg.eq g.toInitialSeg f a
private theorem antisymm_aux [IsWellOrder α r] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : LeftInverse g f :=
(f.trans g).eq (InitialSeg.refl _)
/-- If we have order embeddings between `α` and `β` whose ranges are initial segments, and `β` is a
well order, then `α` and `β` are order-isomorphic. -/
def antisymm [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : r ≃r s :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isWellOrder
⟨⟨f, g, antisymm_aux f g, antisymm_aux g f⟩, f.map_rel_iff'⟩
@[simp]
theorem antisymm_toFun [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) : (antisymm f g : α → β) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem antisymm_symm [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : s ≼i r) :
(antisymm f g).symm = antisymm g f :=
RelIso.coe_fn_injective rfl
/-- An initial segment embedding is either an isomorphism, or a principal segment embedding.
See also `InitialSeg.ltOrEq`. -/
theorem eq_or_principal [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s) :
Surjective f ∨ ∃ b, ∀ x, x ∈ Set.range f ↔ s x b := by
apply or_iff_not_imp_right.2
intro h b
push_neg at h
apply IsWellFounded.induction s b
intro x IH
obtain ⟨y, ⟨hy, hs⟩ | ⟨hy, hs⟩⟩ := h x
· obtain (rfl | h) := (trichotomous y x).resolve_left hs
· exact hy
· obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := hy
exact f.mem_range_of_rel h
· obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := IH y hs
cases hy (Set.mem_range_self z)
/-- Restrict the codomain of an initial segment -/
def codRestrict (p : Set β) (f : r ≼i s) (H : ∀ a, f a ∈ p) : r ≼i Subrel s (· ∈ p) :=
⟨RelEmbedding.codRestrict p f H, fun a ⟨b, m⟩ h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := f.mem_range_of_rel h
⟨a', by subst e; rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem codRestrict_apply (p) (f : r ≼i s) (H a) : codRestrict p f H a = ⟨f a, H a⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Initial segment embedding from an empty type. -/
def ofIsEmpty (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsEmpty α] : r ≼i s :=
⟨RelEmbedding.ofIsEmpty r s, isEmptyElim⟩
/-- Initial segment embedding of an order `r` into the disjoint union of `r` and `s`. -/
def leAdd (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) : r ≼i Sum.Lex r s :=
⟨⟨⟨Sum.inl, fun _ _ => Sum.inl.inj⟩, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩, fun a b => by
cases b <;> [exact fun _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩; exact False.elim ∘ Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩
@[simp]
theorem leAdd_apply (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) (a) : leAdd r s a = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
protected theorem acc (f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : Acc r a ↔ Acc s (f a) :=
⟨by
refine fun h => Acc.recOn h fun a _ ha => Acc.intro _ fun b hb => ?_
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := f.mem_range_of_rel hb
exact ha _ (f.map_rel_iff.mp hb), f.toRelEmbedding.acc a⟩
end InitialSeg
/-! ### Principal segments -/
/-- If `r` is a relation on `α` and `s` in a relation on `β`, then `f : r ≺i s` is an initial
segment embedding whose range is `Set.Iio x` for some element `x`. If `β` is a well order, this is
equivalent to the embedding not being surjective. -/
structure PrincipalSeg {α β : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) extends r ↪r s where
/-- The supremum of the principal segment -/
top : β
/-- The range of the order embedding is the set of elements `b` such that `s b top` -/
mem_range_iff_rel' : ∀ b, b ∈ Set.range toRelEmbedding ↔ s b top
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[InitialSeg] infixl:25 " ≺i " => PrincipalSeg
/-- A `PrincipalSeg` between the `<` relations of two types. -/
notation:25 α:24 " <i " β:25 => @PrincipalSeg α β (· < ·) (· < ·)
open scoped InitialSeg
namespace PrincipalSeg
instance : CoeOut (r ≺i s) (r ↪r s) :=
⟨PrincipalSeg.toRelEmbedding⟩
instance : CoeFun (r ≺i s) fun _ => α → β :=
⟨fun f => f⟩
theorem toRelEmbedding_injective [IsIrrefl β s] [IsTrichotomous β s] :
Function.Injective (@toRelEmbedding α β r s) := by
rintro ⟨f, a, hf⟩ ⟨g, b, hg⟩ rfl
congr
refine extensional_of_trichotomous_of_irrefl s fun x ↦ ?_
rw [← hf, hg]
@[simp]
theorem toRelEmbedding_inj [IsIrrefl β s] [IsTrichotomous β s] {f g : r ≺i s} :
f.toRelEmbedding = g.toRelEmbedding ↔ f = g :=
toRelEmbedding_injective.eq_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext [IsIrrefl β s] [IsTrichotomous β s] {f g : r ≺i s} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := by
rw [← toRelEmbedding_inj]
ext
exact h _
@[simp]
theorem coe_fn_mk (f : r ↪r s) (t o) : (@PrincipalSeg.mk _ _ r s f t o : α → β) = f :=
rfl
theorem mem_range_iff_rel (f : r ≺i s) : ∀ {b : β}, b ∈ Set.range f ↔ s b f.top :=
f.mem_range_iff_rel' _
theorem lt_top (f : r ≺i s) (a : α) : s (f a) f.top :=
f.mem_range_iff_rel.1 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem mem_range_of_rel_top (f : r ≺i s) {b : β} (h : s b f.top) : b ∈ Set.range f :=
f.mem_range_iff_rel.2 h
theorem mem_range_of_rel [IsTrans β s] (f : r ≺i s) {a : α} {b : β} (h : s b (f a)) :
b ∈ Set.range f :=
f.mem_range_of_rel_top <| _root_.trans h <| f.lt_top _
theorem surjOn (f : r ≺i s) : Set.SurjOn f Set.univ { b | s b f.top } := by
intro b h
simpa using mem_range_of_rel_top _ h
/-- A principal segment embedding is in particular an initial segment embedding. -/
instance hasCoeInitialSeg [IsTrans β s] : Coe (r ≺i s) (r ≼i s) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f.toRelEmbedding, fun _ _ => f.mem_range_of_rel⟩⟩
theorem coe_coe_fn' [IsTrans β s] (f : r ≺i s) : ((f : r ≼i s) : α → β) = f :=
rfl
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.eq_principalSeg [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s) (g : r ≺i s) (a : α) :
g a = f a :=
InitialSeg.eq g f a
theorem exists_eq_iff_rel [IsTrans β s] (f : r ≺i s) {a : α} {b : β} :
s b (f a) ↔ ∃ a', f a' = b ∧ r a' a :=
@InitialSeg.exists_eq_iff_rel α β r s f a b
/-- A principal segment is the same as a non-surjective initial segment. -/
noncomputable def _root_.InitialSeg.toPrincipalSeg [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s)
(hf : ¬ Surjective f) : r ≺i s :=
⟨f, _, Classical.choose_spec (f.eq_or_principal.resolve_left hf)⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.toPrincipalSeg_apply [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≼i s)
(hf : ¬ Surjective f) (x : α) : f.toPrincipalSeg hf x = f x :=
rfl
theorem irrefl {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (f : r ≺i r) : False := by
have h := f.lt_top f.top
rw [show f f.top = f.top from InitialSeg.eq f (InitialSeg.refl r) f.top] at h
exact _root_.irrefl _ h
instance (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : IsEmpty (r ≺i r) :=
⟨fun f => f.irrefl⟩
/-- Composition of a principal segment embedding with an initial segment embedding, as a principal
segment embedding -/
def transInitial (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) : r ≺i t :=
⟨@RelEmbedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g f.top, fun a => by
simp [g.exists_eq_iff_rel, ← PrincipalSeg.mem_range_iff_rel, exists_swap, ← exists_and_left]⟩
@[simp]
theorem transInitial_apply (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) (a : α) : f.transInitial g a = g (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem transInitial_top (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≼i t) : (f.transInitial g).top = g f.top :=
rfl
/-- Composition of two principal segment embeddings as a principal segment embedding -/
@[trans]
protected def trans [IsTrans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
transInitial f g
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply [IsTrans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : f.trans g a = g (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_top [IsTrans γ t] (f : r ≺i s) (g : s ≺i t) : (f.trans g).top = g f.top :=
rfl
/-- Composition of an order isomorphism with a principal segment embedding, as a principal
segment embedding -/
def relIsoTrans (f : r ≃r s) (g : s ≺i t) : r ≺i t :=
⟨@RelEmbedding.trans _ _ _ r s t f g, g.top, fun c => by simp [g.mem_range_iff_rel]⟩
@[simp]
theorem relIsoTrans_apply (f : r ≃r s) (g : s ≺i t) (a : α) : relIsoTrans f g a = g (f a) :=
rfl
|
@[simp]
theorem relIsoTrans_top (f : r ≃r s) (g : s ≺i t) : (relIsoTrans f g).top = g.top :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Order/InitialSeg.lean | 373 | 376 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm _ _ := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := abs_sub_le _ _ _
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
exact Or.inl (le_refl _)
theorem Real.ball_eq_Ioo (x r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo (x - r) (x + r) :=
Set.ext fun y => by
rw [mem_ball, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_lt_iff, mem_Ioo, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
sub_lt_comm]
theorem Real.closedBall_eq_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closedBall x r = Icc (x - r) (x + r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add',
sub_le_comm]
theorem Real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
theorem Real.Icc_eq_closedBall (x y : ℝ) : Icc x y = closedBall ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
theorem Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
𝓤 α = comap (fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
ext s
| simp only [mem_uniformity_dist, (nhds_basis_ball.comap _).mem_iff]
simp [subset_def, Real.dist_0_eq_abs]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 1,082 | 1,084 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (a := y \ x) (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
theorem sdiff_lt_left : x \ y < x ↔ ¬ Disjoint y x := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, and_iff_right sdiff_le]
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_right : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) : z \ x ≤ z \ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, sdiff_le_sdiff_left⟩
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hx, ← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left h
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z \ (x \ y) ⊓ z \ (y \ x) := sdiff_sup
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z \ x ⊓ z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x := by rw [← sup_inf_right]
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y := by ac_rfl
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_left (hca : z ≤ x) : (x \ y) \ (x \ z) = z \ y :=
sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff.antisymm <|
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hca
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_right (hcb : z ≤ y) : (x \ z) \ (y \ z) = x \ y := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, sdiff_le_comm]
exact ⟨sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff,
(disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb⟩
theorem inf_sdiff : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x \ z ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z = (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊔ x) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_sdiff_self_right, inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_sup_right]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ (x ⊔ z)) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_self, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_comm y, sup_inf_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := sup_eq_left.2 (inf_le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le))
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x \ z ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊓ x \ z) ⊓ y \ z := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, bot_inf_eq])
/-- See also `sdiff_inf_right_comm`. -/
theorem inf_sdiff_assoc (x y z : α) : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [← inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff])
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊓ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
/-- See also `inf_sdiff_assoc`. -/
theorem sdiff_inf_right_comm (x y z : α) : x \ z ⊓ y = (x ⊓ y) \ z := by
rw [inf_comm x, inf_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
lemma inf_sdiff_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b \ c) = b ⊓ (a \ c) := by
simp_rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-08")] alias inf_sdiff_right_comm := sdiff_inf_right_comm
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_left (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b \ c = (a ⊓ b) \ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 inf_le_left, bot_sup_eq, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_right (a b c : α) : a \ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) \ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_sdiff_distrib_left]
theorem disjoint_sdiff_comm : Disjoint (x \ z) y ↔ Disjoint x (y \ z) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff, sdiff_inf_right_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf : x ⊔ y = x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y = (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x \ y ⊔ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ (y \ x ⊔ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_sdiff_right, sup_sdiff_right]
_ = x ⊔ y := by rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff_self_left, inf_idem]
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left (h : y < z \ x) (hxz : x ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hxz]
refine (sup_le_sup_left h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left h').trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < z \ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sdiff_sup_cancel hyz]
refine (sup_le_sup_right h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right h').trans sdiff_le
instance Prod.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
sup_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (sup_inf_sdiff _ _) (sup_inf_sdiff _ _)
inf_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (inf_inf_sdiff _ _) (inf_inf_sdiff _ _)
-- Porting note: Once `pi_instance` has been ported, this is just `by pi_instance`.
instance Pi.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sup_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => sup_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
inf_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => inf_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
|
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 473 | 474 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Chenyi Li. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chenyi Li, Ziyu Wang, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
/-!
# Uniformly and strongly convex functions
In this file, we define uniformly convex functions and strongly convex functions.
For a real normed space `E`, a uniformly convex function with modulus `φ : ℝ → ℝ` is a function
`f : E → ℝ` such that `f (t • x + (1 - t) • y) ≤ t • f x + (1 - t) • f y - t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖`
for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
A `m`-strongly convex function is a uniformly convex function with modulus `fun r ↦ m / 2 * r ^ 2`.
If `E` is an inner product space, this is equivalent to `x ↦ f x - m / 2 * ‖x‖ ^ 2` being convex.
## TODO
Prove derivative properties of strongly convex functions.
-/
open Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
section NormedSpace
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {φ ψ : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set E} {m : ℝ} {f g : E → ℝ}
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is uniformly convex with modulus `φ` if
`f (t • x + (1 - t) • y) ≤ t • f x + (1 - t) • f y - t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖` for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
`φ` is usually taken to be a monotone function such that `φ r = 0 ↔ r = 0`. -/
def UniformConvexOn (s : Set E) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) (f : E → ℝ) : Prop :=
Convex ℝ s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : ℝ⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y - a * b * φ ‖x - y‖
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is uniformly concave with modulus `φ` if
`t • f x + (1 - t) • f y + t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖ ≤ f (t • x + (1 - t) • y)` for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
`φ` is usually taken to be a monotone function such that `φ r = 0 ↔ r = 0`. -/
def UniformConcaveOn (s : Set E) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) (f : E → ℝ) : Prop :=
Convex ℝ s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : ℝ⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y + a * b * φ ‖x - y‖ ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
@[simp] lemma uniformConvexOn_zero : UniformConvexOn s 0 f ↔ ConvexOn ℝ s f := by
simp [UniformConvexOn, ConvexOn]
@[simp] lemma uniformConcaveOn_zero : UniformConcaveOn s 0 f ↔ ConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
simp [UniformConcaveOn, ConcaveOn]
protected alias ⟨_, ConvexOn.uniformConvexOn_zero⟩ := uniformConvexOn_zero
protected alias ⟨_, ConcaveOn.uniformConcaveOn_zero⟩ := uniformConcaveOn_zero
|
lemma UniformConvexOn.mono (hψφ : ψ ≤ φ) (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) : UniformConvexOn s ψ f :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Strong.lean | 57 | 58 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,770 | 1,800 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.FDeriv
/-!
# Differentiability of specific functions
In this file, we establish differentiability results for
- continuous linear maps and continuous linear equivalences
- the identity
- constant functions
- products
- arithmetic operations (such as addition and scalar multiplication).
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
open Bundle Set Topology
section SpecificFunctions
/-! ### Differentiability of specific functions -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- declare a charted space `M` over the pair `(E, H)`.
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- declare a charted space `M'` over the pair `(E', H')`.
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
-- declare a charted space `M''` over the pair `(E'', H'')`.
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare a charted space `N` over the pair `(F, G)`.
{F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G]
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G} {N : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N] [ChartedSpace G N]
-- declare a charted space `N'` over the pair `(F', G')`.
{F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G']
{J' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F' G'} {N' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N'] [ChartedSpace G' N']
-- F₁, F₂, F₃, F₄ are normed spaces
{F₁ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₁] {F₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₂]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F₂] {F₃ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₃] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₃] {F₄ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₄] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₄]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable (f : E →L[𝕜] E') {s : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt : HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x f :=
f.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt : HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x f :=
f.hasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt : MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x :=
f.differentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s :=
f.differentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt : MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x :=
f.differentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f :=
f.differentiable.mdifferentiable
theorem mfderiv_eq : mfderiv 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x = f :=
f.hasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x) :
mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x = f :=
f.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin hs
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable (f : E ≃L[𝕜] E') {s : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt : HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt : HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt : MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x :=
f.differentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s :=
f.differentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt : MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x :=
f.differentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f :=
f.differentiable.mdifferentiable
theorem mfderiv_eq : mfderiv 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x = (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x) :
mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x = (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin hs
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable {s : Set M} {x : M}
section id
/-! #### Identity -/
theorem hasMFDerivAt_id (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I (@id M) x (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x)) := by
refine ⟨continuousAt_id, ?_⟩
have : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x, (extChartAt I x ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) y = y := by
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x)
mfld_set_tac
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _) this
simp only [mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_id (s : Set M) (x : M) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I (@id M) s x (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_id x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_id : MDifferentiableAt I I (@id M) x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_id x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_id : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I (@id M) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_id.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_id : MDifferentiable I I (@id M) := fun _ => mdifferentiableAt_id
theorem mdifferentiableOn_id : MDifferentiableOn I I (@id M) s :=
mdifferentiable_id.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_id : mfderiv I I (@id M) x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) :=
HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (hasMFDerivAt_id x)
theorem mfderivWithin_id (hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) :
mfderivWithin I I (@id M) s x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) := by
rw [MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin mdifferentiableAt_id hxs]
exact mfderiv_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMap_id : tangentMap I I (id : M → M) = id := by ext1 ⟨x, v⟩; simp [tangentMap]
theorem tangentMapWithin_id {p : TangentBundle I M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s p.proj) :
tangentMapWithin I I (id : M → M) s p = p := by
simp only [tangentMapWithin, id]
rw [mfderivWithin_id]
· rcases p with ⟨⟩; rfl
· exact hs
end id
section Const
/-! #### Constants -/
variable {c : M'}
theorem hasMFDerivAt_const (c : M') (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) := by
refine ⟨continuous_const.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [writtenInExtChartAt, Function.comp_def, hasFDerivWithinAt_const]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_const (c : M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_const c x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_const : MDifferentiableAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_const c x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_const : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_const.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_const : MDifferentiable I I' fun _ : M => c := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_const
theorem mdifferentiableOn_const : MDifferentiableOn I I' (fun _ : M => c) s :=
mdifferentiable_const.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_const :
mfderiv I I' (fun _ : M => c) x = (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (hasMFDerivAt_const c x)
theorem mfderivWithin_const :
mfderivWithin I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x = (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _).mfderivWithin_eq_zero
end Const
section Prod
/-! ### Operations on the product of two manifolds -/
theorem hasMFDerivAt_fst (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) := by
refine ⟨continuous_fst.continuousAt, ?_⟩
have :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range (I.prod I')] extChartAt (I.prod I') x x,
(extChartAt I x.1 ∘ Prod.fst ∘ (extChartAt (I.prod I') x).symm) y = y.1 := by
/- porting note: was
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (I.prod I') x)
mfld_set_tac
-/
filter_upwards [extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x] with y hy
rw [extChartAt_prod] at hy
exact (extChartAt I x.1).right_inv hy.1
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hasFDerivWithinAt_fst this
-- Porting note: next line was `simp only [mfld_simps]`
exact (extChartAt I x.1).right_inv <| (extChartAt I x.1).map_source (mem_extChartAt_source _)
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_fst (s : Set (M × M')) (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_fst {x : M × M'} : MDifferentiableAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_fst {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_fst.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_fst : MDifferentiable (I.prod I') I (Prod.fst : M × M' → M) := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_fst
theorem mdifferentiableOn_fst {s : Set (M × M')} : MDifferentiableOn (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s :=
mdifferentiable_fst.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_fst {x : M × M'} :
mfderiv (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x =
ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_fst {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'}
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') s x) :
mfderivWithin (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x =
ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2) := by
rw [MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin mdifferentiableAt_fst hxs]; exact mfderiv_fst
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMap_prodFst {p : TangentBundle (I.prod I') (M × M')} :
tangentMap (I.prod I') I Prod.fst p = ⟨p.proj.1, p.2.1⟩ := by
simp [tangentMap]; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias tangentMap_prod_fst := tangentMap_prodFst
theorem tangentMapWithin_prodFst {s : Set (M × M')} {p : TangentBundle (I.prod I') (M × M')}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') s p.proj) :
tangentMapWithin (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s p = ⟨p.proj.1, p.2.1⟩ := by
simp only [tangentMapWithin]
rw [mfderivWithin_fst]
· rcases p with ⟨⟩; rfl
· exact hs
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias tangentMapWithin_prod_fst := tangentMapWithin_prodFst
|
theorem hasMFDerivAt_snd (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivAt (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd x
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) := by
refine ⟨continuous_snd.continuousAt, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/SpecificFunctions.lean | 277 | 281 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
/-!
# Relationship between the Haar and Lebesgue measures
We prove that the Haar measure and Lebesgue measure are equal on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`, in
`MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume` and `MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi`.
We deduce basic properties of any Haar measure on a finite dimensional real vector space:
* `map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar`: a linear map rescales the Haar measure by the
absolute value of its determinant.
* `addHaar_preimage_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map with nonzero determinant, the measure
of `f ⁻¹' s` is the measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the inverse of the
determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_image_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map, the measure of `f '' s` is the
measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_submodule` : a strict submodule has measure `0`.
* `addHaar_smul` : the measure of `r • s` is `|r| ^ dim * μ s`.
* `addHaar_ball`: the measure of `ball x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_closedBall`: the measure of `closedBall x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_sphere`: spheres have zero measure.
This makes it possible to associate a Lebesgue measure to an `n`-alternating map in dimension `n`.
This measure is called `AlternatingMap.measure`. Its main property is
`ω.measure_parallelepiped v`, stating that the associated measure of the parallelepiped spanned
by vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ` is given by `|ω v|`.
We also show that a Lebesgue density point `x` of a set `s` (with respect to closed balls) has
density one for the rescaled copies `{x} + r • t` of a given set `t` with positive measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one`. In particular, `s` intersects `{x} + r • t` for
small `r`, see `eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one`.
Statements on integrals of functions with respect to an additive Haar measure can be found in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace`.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
/-- The interval `[0,1]` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
universe u
/-- The set `[0,1]^ι` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
/-- The parallelepiped formed from the standard basis for `ι → ℝ` is `[0,1]^ι` -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
/-- A parallelepiped can be expressed on the standard basis. -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp [Pi.single_apply]
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts Module
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure is a Haar measure on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`.
-/
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ^ι`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
theorem isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) :=
inferInstance
namespace Measure
/-!
### Strict subspaces have zero measure
-/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. This auxiliary lemma proves this assuming additionally that the set is bounded. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (sb : IsBounded s) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl ∞
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : ℕ, μ s := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero h).symm
_ = ∑' n : ℕ, μ ({u n} + s) := by
congr 1; ext1 n; simp only [image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
_ = μ (⋃ n, {u n} + s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion hs fun n => by
simpa only [image_add_left, singleton_add] using measurable_id.const_add _ h's
_ = μ (range u + s) := by rw [← iUnion_add, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
_ < ∞ := (hu.add sb).measure_lt_top
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 R) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 n) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
intro R
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux μ u
(isBounded_closedBall.subset inter_subset_right) hu _ (h's.inter measurableSet_closedBall)
refine pairwise_disjoint_mono hs fun n => ?_
exact add_subset_add Subset.rfl inter_subset_left
/-- A strict vector subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_submodule {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (s : Submodule ℝ E)
(hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [Submodule.eq_top_iff', not_exists, Ne, not_forall] using hs
obtain ⟨c, cpos, cone⟩ : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ c < 1 := ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩
have A : IsBounded (range fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) :=
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ) • x)) :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one cpos.le cone).smul_const x
isBounded_range_of_tendsto _ this
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates μ _ A _
(Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional s).measurableSet
intro m n hmn
simp only [Function.onFun, image_add_left, singleton_add, disjoint_left, mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
intro y hym hyn
have A : (c ^ n - c ^ m) • x ∈ s := by
convert s.sub_mem hym hyn using 1
simp only [sub_smul, neg_sub_neg, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
have H : c ^ n - c ^ m ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, Ne] using (pow_right_strictAnti₀ cpos cone).injective.ne hmn.symm
have : x ∈ s := by
convert s.smul_mem (c ^ n - c ^ m)⁻¹ A
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ H, one_smul]
exact hx this
/-- A strict affine subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_affineSubspace {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(s : AffineSubspace ℝ E) (hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [AffineSubspace.bot_coe, measure_empty]
rw [Ne, ← AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty hne] at hs
rcases hne with ⟨x, hx : x ∈ s⟩
simpa only [AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx, vsub_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
image_add_right, neg_neg, measure_preimage_add_right] using addHaar_submodule μ s.direction hs
/-!
### Applying a linear map rescales Haar measure by the determinant
We first prove this on `ι → ℝ`, using that this is already known for the product Lebesgue
measure (thanks to matrices computations). Then, we extend this to any finite-dimensional real
vector space by using a linear equiv with a space of the form `ι → ℝ`, and arguing that such a
linear equiv maps Haar measure to Haar measure.
-/
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
/- We have already proved the result for the Lebesgue product measure, using matrices.
We deduce it for any Haar measure by uniqueness (up to scalar multiplication). -/
have := addHaarMeasure_unique μ (piIcc01 ι)
rw [this, addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi, Measure.map_smul,
Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi hf, smul_comm]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| • μ := by
-- we reduce to the case of `E = ι → ℝ`, for which we have already proved the result using
-- matrices in `map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar`.
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by infer_instance
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [ι]
have e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ := LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq E (ι → ℝ) this
-- next line is to avoid `g` getting reduced by `simp`.
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g = (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).comp (f.comp (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E)) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
have gdet : LinearMap.det g = LinearMap.det f := by rw [hg]; exact LinearMap.det_conj f e
rw [← gdet] at hf ⊢
have fg : f = (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).comp (g.comp (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ)) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, hg]
simp only [fg, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp]
have Ce : Continuous e := (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
have Cg : Continuous g := LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional g
have Cesymm : Continuous e.symm := (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
rw [← map_map Cesymm.measurable (Cg.comp Ce).measurable, ← map_map Cg.measurable Ce.measurable]
haveI : IsAddHaarMeasure (map e μ) := (e : E ≃+ (ι → ℝ)).isAddHaarMeasure_map μ Ce Cesymm
have ecomp : e.symm ∘ e = id := by
ext x; simp only [id, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar hf (map e μ), Measure.map_smul,
map_map Cesymm.measurable Ce.measurable, ecomp, Measure.map_id]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearMap {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map f μ s :=
((f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply
s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s := by
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]; rfl
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearMap {f : E →L[ℝ] E}
(hf : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E))⁻¹) * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ hf s
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s := by
have A : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0 := (LinearEquiv.isUnit_det' f).ne_zero
convert addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ A s
simp only [LinearEquiv.det_coe_symm]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det f| * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq (LinearMap.det f) 0 with (hf | hf)
· let g := (f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
change μ (g '' s) = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.image_eq_preimage g s, addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv]
congr
· simp only [hf, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero]
have : μ (LinearMap.range f) = 0 :=
addHaar_submodule μ _ (LinearMap.range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero hf).ne
exact le_antisymm (le_trans (measure_mono (image_subset_range _ _)) this.le) (zero_le _)
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_image_linearMap μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
μ.addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) s
theorem LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ := by
refine ⟨f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable, ?_⟩
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (hf : f.det ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ :=
LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving μ (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) hf
/-!
### Basic properties of Haar measures on real vector spaces
-/
theorem map_addHaar_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (r • ·) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) • μ := by
let f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E := r • (1 : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)
change Measure.map f μ = _
have hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [f, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, Ne, MonoidHom.map_one]
intro h
exact hr (pow_eq_zero h)
simp only [f, map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, map_one]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (r • ·) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_const_smul r, ?_⟩
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s :=
calc
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (r • ·) μ s :=
((Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hr).unit).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s := by
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
/-- Rescaling a set by a factor `r` multiplies its measure by `abs (r ^ dim)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_smul (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq r 0 with (h | rfl)
· rw [← preimage_smul_inv₀ h, addHaar_preimage_smul μ (inv_ne_zero h), inv_pow, inv_inv]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [measure_empty, mul_zero, smul_set_empty]
rw [zero_smul_set hs, ← singleton_zero]
by_cases h : finrank ℝ E = 0
· haveI : Subsingleton E := finrank_zero_iff.1 h
simp only [h, one_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_one, abs_one, Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty hs,
pow_zero, Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (singleton_nonempty (0 : E))]
· haveI : Nontrivial E := nontrivial_of_finrank_pos (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 h)
simp only [h, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero, Ne, not_false_iff,
zero_pow, measure_singleton]
theorem addHaar_smul_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ s := by
rw [addHaar_smul, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg hr]
variable {μ} {s : Set E}
-- Note: We might want to rename this once we acquire the lemma corresponding to
-- `MeasurableSet.const_smul`
theorem NullMeasurableSet.const_smul (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (r : ℝ) :
NullMeasurableSet (r • s) μ := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· simpa [zero_smul_set hs'] using nullMeasurableSet_singleton _
obtain ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := hs
refine ⟨_, ht.const_smul_of_ne_zero hr, ?_⟩
rw [← measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff] at hst ⊢
rw [← smul_set_symmDiff₀ hr, addHaar_smul μ, hst, mul_zero]
variable (μ)
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_homothety (x : E) (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (AffineMap.homothety x r '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s :=
calc
μ (AffineMap.homothety x r '' s) = μ ((fun y => y + x) '' (r • (fun y => y + -x) '' s)) := by
simp only [← image_smul, image_image, ← sub_eq_add_neg]; rfl
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
simp only [image_add_right, measure_preimage_add_right, addHaar_smul]
/-! We don't need to state `map_addHaar_neg` here, because it has already been proved for
general Haar measures on general commutative groups. -/
/-! ### Measure of balls -/
theorem addHaar_ball_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
(μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : μ (ball x r) = μ (ball (0 : E) r) := by
have : ball (0 : E) r = (x + ·) ⁻¹' ball x r := by simp [preimage_add_ball]
rw [this, measure_preimage_add]
theorem addHaar_real_ball_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (ball x r) = μ.real (ball (0 : E) r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_ball_center]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x r) = μ (closedBall (0 : E) r) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) r = (x + ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r := by simp [preimage_add_closedBall]
rw [this, measure_preimage_add]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = μ.real (closedBall (0 : E) r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall_center]
theorem addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (ball x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 s) := by
have : ball (0 : E) (r * s) = r • ball (0 : E) s := by
simp only [_root_.smul_ball hr.ne' (0 : E) s, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, smul_zero]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, addHaar_ball_center, abs_pow]
theorem addHaar_ball_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
μ (ball x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos μ x hr, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_ball_mul [Nontrivial E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (ball x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 s) := by
rcases hr.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h)
| · simp only [zero_pow (finrank_pos (R := ℝ) (M := E)).ne', measure_empty, zero_mul,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ball_zero]
· exact addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos μ x h s
theorem addHaar_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 447 | 451 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Chris Hughes, Michael Howes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Units
/-!
# Conjugacy of group elements
See also `MulAut.conj` and `Quandle.conj`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Multiset MulAction
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β]
/-- We say that `a` is conjugate to `b` if for some unit `c` we have `c * a * c⁻¹ = b`. -/
def IsConj (a b : α) :=
∃ c : αˣ, SemiconjBy (↑c) a b
@[refl]
theorem IsConj.refl (a : α) : IsConj a a :=
⟨1, SemiconjBy.one_left a⟩
@[symm]
theorem IsConj.symm {a b : α} : IsConj a b → IsConj b a
| ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨c⁻¹, hc.units_inv_symm_left⟩
theorem isConj_comm {g h : α} : IsConj g h ↔ IsConj h g :=
⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem IsConj.trans {a b c : α} : IsConj a b → IsConj b c → IsConj a c
| ⟨c₁, hc₁⟩, ⟨c₂, hc₂⟩ => ⟨c₂ * c₁, hc₂.mul_left hc₁⟩
theorem IsConj.pow {a b : α} (n : ℕ) : IsConj a b → IsConj (a^n) (b^n)
| ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨c, hc.pow_right n⟩
@[simp]
theorem isConj_iff_eq {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} : IsConj a b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => by
rw [SemiconjBy, mul_comm, ← Units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_assoc, c.mul_inv, mul_one] at hc
exact hc, fun h => by rw [h]⟩
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_isConj (f : α →* β) {a b : α} : IsConj a b → IsConj (f a) (f b)
| ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨Units.map f c, by rw [Units.coe_map, SemiconjBy, ← f.map_mul, hc.eq, f.map_mul]⟩
@[simp]
theorem isConj_one_right {a : α} : IsConj 1 a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨c, h⟩ => ?_, fun h => by rw [h]⟩
rw [SemiconjBy, mul_one] at h
exact c.isUnit.mul_eq_right.mp h.symm
@[simp]
theorem isConj_one_left {a : α} : IsConj a 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
calc
IsConj a 1 ↔ IsConj 1 a := ⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
_ ↔ a = 1 := isConj_one_right
end Monoid
section Group
variable [Group α]
@[simp]
theorem isConj_iff {a b : α} : IsConj a b ↔ ∃ c : α, c * a * c⁻¹ = b :=
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => ⟨c, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 hc⟩, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ =>
⟨⟨c, c⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel c, inv_mul_cancel c⟩, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul.1 hc⟩⟩
theorem conj_inv {a b : α} : (b * a * b⁻¹)⁻¹ = b * a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ :=
(map_inv (MulAut.conj b) a).symm
@[simp]
theorem conj_mul {a b c : α} : b * a * b⁻¹ * (b * c * b⁻¹) = b * (a * c) * b⁻¹ :=
(map_mul (MulAut.conj b) a c).symm
@[simp]
theorem conj_pow {i : ℕ} {a b : α} : (a * b * a⁻¹) ^ i = a * b ^ i * a⁻¹ := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, hi]
@[simp]
theorem conj_zpow {i : ℤ} {a b : α} : (a * b * a⁻¹) ^ i = a * b ^ i * a⁻¹ := by
cases i
· simp
· simp only [zpow_negSucc, conj_pow, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
rw [mul_assoc]
theorem conj_injective {x : α} : Function.Injective fun g : α => x * g * x⁻¹ :=
(MulAut.conj x).injective
end Group
namespace IsConj
/- This small quotient API is largely copied from the API of `Associates`;
where possible, try to keep them in sync -/
/-- The setoid of the relation `IsConj` iff there is a unit `u` such that `u * x = y * u` -/
protected def setoid (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Setoid α where
r := IsConj
iseqv := ⟨IsConj.refl, IsConj.symm, IsConj.trans⟩
end IsConj
attribute [local instance] IsConj.setoid
| /-- The quotient type of conjugacy classes of a group. -/
def ConjClasses (α : Type*) [Monoid α] : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsConj.setoid α)
namespace ConjClasses
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Conj.lean | 117 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
/-!
# Connected subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define connected subsets of a topological spaces and various other properties and
classes related to connectivity.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsConnected`: a nonempty set that has no non-trivial open partition.
See also the section below in the module doc.
* `connectedComponent` is the connected component of an element in the space.
We also have a class stating that the whole space satisfies that property: `ConnectedSpace`
## On the definition of connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreconnected`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
/-- If any two points of a set are contained in a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
/-- A union of a family of preconnected sets with a common point is preconnected as well. -/
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
theorem IsConnected.union {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (Hs : IsConnected s)
(Ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, ?_⟩
exact Hs.isPreconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Ht.isPreconnected
/-- The directed sUnion of a set S of preconnected subsets is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed {S : Set (Set α)} (K : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ S) := by
rintro u v hu hv Huv ⟨a, ⟨s, hsS, has⟩, hau⟩ ⟨b, ⟨t, htS, hbt⟩, hbv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hrS, hsr, htr⟩ : ∃ r ∈ S, s ⊆ r ∧ t ⊆ r := K s hsS t htS
have Hnuv : (r ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty :=
H _ hrS u v hu hv ((subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS).trans Huv) ⟨a, hsr has, hau⟩ ⟨b, htr hbt, hbv⟩
have Kruv : r ∩ (u ∩ v) ⊆ ⋃₀ S ∩ (u ∩ v) := inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS)
exact Hnuv.mono Kruv
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
let R := fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t
have P : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen R i j →
∃ p, p ⊆ t ∧ i ∈ p ∧ j ∈ p ∧ IsPreconnected (⋃ j ∈ p, s j) := fun i hi j hj h => by
induction h with
| refl =>
refine ⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hi, mem_singleton i, mem_singleton i, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_singleton]
exact H i hi
| @tail j k _ hjk ih =>
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := ih hjk.2
refine ⟨insert k p, insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hj, hpt⟩, mem_insert_of_mem k hip,
mem_insert k p, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_insert]
refine (H k hj).union' (hjk.1.mono ?_) hp
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hjp)
refine isPreconnected_of_forall_pair ?_
intro x hx y hy
obtain ⟨i : ι, hi : i ∈ t, hxi : x ∈ s i⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hx
obtain ⟨j : ι, hj : j ∈ t, hyj : y ∈ s j⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hy
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := P i hi j hj (K i hi j hj)
exact ⟨⋃ j ∈ p, s j, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hpt, mem_biUnion hip hxi,
mem_biUnion hjp hyj, hp⟩
/-- The biUnion of a family of preconnected sets is preconnected if the graph determined by
whether two sets intersect is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(ht : t.Nonempty) (H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨ht.some, ht.some_mem, (H _ ht.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
/-- Preconnectedness of the iUnion of a family of preconnected sets
indexed by the vertices of a preconnected graph,
where two vertices are joined when the corresponding sets intersect. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) := by
rw [← biUnion_univ]
exact IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i _ => H i) fun i _ j _ => by
simpa [mem_univ] using K i j
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_iUnion.2 <| Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun i : ι => ⟨i, (H _).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i => (H i).isPreconnected) K⟩
section SuccOrder
open Order
variable [LinearOrder β] [SuccOrder β] [IsSuccArchimedean β]
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a type with an archimedean successor (like `ℕ` or `ℤ`)
such that any two neighboring sets meet is connected. -/
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_chain [Nonempty β] {s : β → Set α} (H : ∀ n, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n, (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun _ _ =>
reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun i _ => K i) fun i _ => by
rw [inter_comm]
exact K i
/-- The iUnion of preconnected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (ht : OrdConnected t)
(H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
have h1 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj (Ico_subset_Icc_self hk)
have h2 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → succ k ∈ t := fun hi hj hk =>
ht.out hi hj ⟨hk.1.trans <| le_succ _, succ_le_of_lt hk.2⟩
have h3 : ∀ {i j k : β}, i ∈ t → j ∈ t → k ∈ Ico i j → (s k ∩ s (succ k)).Nonempty :=
fun hi hj hk => K _ (h1 hi hj hk) (h2 hi hj hk)
refine IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen H fun i hi j hj => ?_
exact reflTransGen_of_succ _ (fun k hk => ⟨h3 hi hj hk, h1 hi hj hk⟩) fun k hk =>
⟨by rw [inter_comm]; exact h3 hj hi hk, h2 hj hi hk⟩
/-- The iUnion of connected sets indexed by a subset of a type with an archimedean successor
(like `ℕ` or `ℤ`) such that any two neighboring sets meet is preconnected. -/
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_chain {s : β → Set α} {t : Set β} (hnt : t.Nonempty)
(ht : OrdConnected t) (H : ∀ n ∈ t, IsConnected (s n))
(K : ∀ n : β, n ∈ t → succ n ∈ t → (s n ∩ s (succ n)).Nonempty) : IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨hnt.some, hnt.some_mem, (H _ hnt.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_chain ht (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
end SuccOrder
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a preconnected set and its closure, then it is
preconnected as well. See also `IsConnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsPreconnected t :=
fun u v hu hv htuv ⟨_y, hyt, hyu⟩ ⟨_z, hzt, hzv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hyt) u hu hyu
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hzt) v hv hzv
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (Subset.trans Kst htuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩
⟨r, Kst hrs, hruv⟩
/-- Theorem of bark and tree: if a set is within a connected set and its closure, then it is
connected as well. See also `IsPreconnected.subset_closure`. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsConnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsConnected t :=
⟨Nonempty.mono Kst H.left, IsPreconnected.subset_closure H.right Kst Ktcs⟩
/-- The closure of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s) :
IsPreconnected (closure s) :=
IsPreconnected.subset_closure H subset_closure Subset.rfl
/-- The closure of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) : IsConnected (closure s) :=
IsConnected.subset_closure H subset_closure <| Subset.rfl
/-- The image of a preconnected set is preconnected as well. -/
protected theorem IsPreconnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) := by
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintro u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v' := by
rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv
replace huv := subset_inter huv Subset.rfl
rw [union_inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← union_inter_distrib_right] at huv
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹IsPreconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).Nonempty := by
refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, ?_⟩ ⟨y, ?_⟩ <;> rw [inter_comm]
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩]
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc, inter_comm s, inter_comm s,
← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
/-- The image of a connected set is connected as well. -/
protected theorem IsConnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) (f : α → β)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsConnected (f '' s) :=
⟨image_nonempty.mpr H.nonempty, H.isPreconnected.image f hf⟩
theorem isPreconnected_closed_iff {s : Set α} :
IsPreconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', IsClosed t → IsClosed t' →
s ⊆ t ∪ t' → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → (s ∩ t').Nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).Nonempty :=
⟨by
rintro h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xt' : x ∉ t' := (h' xs).resolve_left (absurd xt)
have yt : y ∉ t := (h' ys).resolve_right (absurd yt')
have := h _ _ ht.isOpen_compl ht'.isOpen_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty htt'.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq,
by
rintro h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xv : x ∉ v := (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id
have yu : y ∉ u := (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv)
have := h _ _ hu.isClosed_compl hv.isClosed_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty huv.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPreconnected_image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : IsInducing f) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) ↔ IsPreconnected s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.image _ hf.continuous.continuousOn⟩
rintro u v hu' hv' huv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hu' with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hv' with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
replace huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v := by rwa [image_subset_iff]
rcases h u v hu hv huv ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hys, hyv⟩ with
⟨_, ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩, hzuv⟩
exact ⟨z, hzs, hzuv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPreconnected_image := IsInducing.isPreconnected_image
/- TODO: The following lemmas about connection of preimages hold more generally for strict maps
(the quotient and subspace topologies of the image agree) whose fibers are preconnected. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) := fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β}
(hs : IsPreconnected s) {f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f)
(hsf : s ⊆ range f) : IsPreconnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2 fun u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv => by
replace hsf : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := image_preimage_eq_of_subset hsf
obtain ⟨_, has, ⟨a, hau, rfl⟩, hav⟩ : (s ∩ (f '' u ∩ f '' v)).Nonempty := by
refine isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 hs (f '' u) (f '' v) (hf u hu) (hf v hv) ?_ ?_ ?_
· simpa only [hsf, image_union] using image_subset f hsuv
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsu.image f
· simpa only [image_preimage_inter] using hsv.image f
· exact ⟨a, has, hau, hinj.mem_set_image.1 hav⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsOpenMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isOpenMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsConnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
{f : α → β} (hinj : Function.Injective f) (hf : IsClosedMap f) (hsf : s ⊆ range f) :
IsConnected (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨hs.nonempty.preimage' hsf, hs.isPreconnected.preimage_of_isClosedMap hinj hf hsf⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_or_subset (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v) (huv : Disjoint u v)
(hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hs : IsPreconnected s) : s ⊆ u ∨ s ⊆ v := by
specialize hs u v hu hv hsuv
obtain hsu | hsu := (s ∩ u).eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact Or.inr ((Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.2 hsu).subset_right_of_subset_union hsuv)
· replace hs := mt (hs hsu)
simp_rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, ← Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty,
disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 huv] at hs
exact Or.inl ((hs s.disjoint_empty).subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_left_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsu : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ u :=
Disjoint.subset_left_of_subset_union hsuv
(by
by_contra hsv
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter] at hsv
obtain ⟨x, _, hx⟩ := hs u v hu hv hsuv hsu hsv
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 huv hx)
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_right_of_subset_union (hu : IsOpen u) (hv : IsOpen v)
(huv : Disjoint u v) (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v) (hsv : (s ∩ v).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ⊆ v :=
hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hv hu huv.symm (union_comm u v ▸ hsuv) hsv
/-- If a preconnected set `s` intersects an open set `u`, and limit points of `u` inside `s` are
contained in `u`, then the whole set `s` is contained in `u`. -/
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_of_closure_inter_subset (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hu : IsOpen u)
(h'u : (s ∩ u).Nonempty) (h : closure u ∩ s ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u := by
have A : s ⊆ u ∪ (closure u)ᶜ := by
intro x hx
by_cases xu : x ∈ u
· exact Or.inl xu
· right
intro h'x
exact xu (h (mem_inter h'x hx))
apply hs.subset_left_of_subset_union hu isClosed_closure.isOpen_compl _ A h'u
exact disjoint_compl_right.mono_right (compl_subset_compl.2 subset_closure)
theorem IsPreconnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ×ˢ t) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨ha₁, hb₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ ⟨ha₂, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Prod.mk a₁ '' t ∪ flip Prod.mk b₂ '' s, ?_, .inl ⟨b₁, hb₁, rfl⟩, .inr ⟨a₂, ha₂, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro _ (⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ | ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨ha₁, hy⟩, ⟨hx, hb₂⟩]
· exact (ht.image _ (by fun_prop)).union (a₁, b₂) ⟨b₂, hb₂, rfl⟩
⟨a₁, ha₁, rfl⟩ (hs.image _ (Continuous.prodMk_left _).continuousOn)
theorem IsConnected.prod [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : IsConnected s)
(ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ×ˢ t) :=
⟨hs.1.prod ht.1, hs.2.prod ht.2⟩
theorem isPreconnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)}
(hs : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (pi univ s) := by
rintro u v uo vo hsuv ⟨f, hfs, hfu⟩ ⟨g, hgs, hgv⟩
classical
rcases exists_finset_piecewise_mem_of_mem_nhds (uo.mem_nhds hfu) g with ⟨I, hI⟩
induction I using Finset.induction_on with
| empty =>
refine ⟨g, hgs, ⟨?_, hgv⟩⟩
simpa using hI
| insert i I _ ihI =>
rw [Finset.piecewise_insert] at hI
have := I.piecewise_mem_set_pi hfs hgs
refine (hsuv this).elim ihI fun h => ?_
set S := update (I.piecewise f g) i '' s i
have hsub : S ⊆ pi univ s := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun z hz => ?_
rwa [update_preimage_univ_pi]
exact fun j _ => this j trivial
have hconn : IsPreconnected S :=
(hs i).image _ (continuous_const.update i continuous_id).continuousOn
have hSu : (S ∩ u).Nonempty := ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ (hfs _ trivial), hI⟩
have hSv : (S ∩ v).Nonempty := ⟨_, ⟨_, this _ trivial, update_eq_self _ _⟩, h⟩
refine (hconn u v uo vo (hsub.trans hsuv) hSu hSv).mono ?_
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ hsub
@[simp]
theorem isConnected_univ_pi [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} :
IsConnected (pi univ s) ↔ ∀ i, IsConnected (s i) := by
simp only [IsConnected, ← univ_pi_nonempty_iff, forall_and, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun hne => ⟨fun hc i => ?_, isPreconnected_univ_pi⟩
rw [← eval_image_univ_pi hne]
exact hc.image _ (continuous_apply _).continuousOn
/-- The connected component of a point is the maximal connected set
that contains this point. -/
def connectedComponent (x : α) : Set α :=
⋃₀ { s : Set α | IsPreconnected s ∧ x ∈ s }
open Classical in
/-- Given a set `F` in a topological space `α` and a point `x : α`, the connected
component of `x` in `F` is the connected component of `x` in the subtype `F` seen as
a set in `α`. This definition does not make sense if `x` is not in `F` so we return the
empty set in this case. -/
def connectedComponentIn (F : Set α) (x : α) : Set α :=
if h : x ∈ F then (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) else ∅
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_image {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = (↑) '' connectedComponent (⟨x, h⟩ : F) :=
dif_pos h
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq_empty {F : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ F) :
connectedComponentIn F x = ∅ :=
dif_neg h
theorem mem_connectedComponent {x : α} : x ∈ connectedComponent x :=
mem_sUnion_of_mem (mem_singleton x) ⟨isPreconnected_singleton, mem_singleton x⟩
theorem mem_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hx : x ∈ F) :
x ∈ connectedComponentIn F x := by
simp [connectedComponentIn_eq_image hx, mem_connectedComponent, hx]
theorem connectedComponent_nonempty {x : α} : (connectedComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
(connectedComponentIn F x).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp [connectedComponent_nonempty, *]
theorem connectedComponentIn_subset (F : Set α) (x : α) : connectedComponentIn F x ⊆ F := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsPreconnected (connectedComponent x) :=
isPreconnected_sUnion x _ (fun _ => And.right) fun _ => And.left
theorem isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsPreconnected (connectedComponentIn F x) := by
rw [connectedComponentIn]; split_ifs
· exact IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mpr isPreconnected_connectedComponent
· exact isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_connectedComponent {x : α} : IsConnected (connectedComponent x) :=
⟨⟨x, mem_connectedComponent⟩, isPreconnected_connectedComponent⟩
theorem isConnected_connectedComponentIn_iff {x : α} {F : Set α} :
IsConnected (connectedComponentIn F x) ↔ x ∈ F := by
simp_rw [← connectedComponentIn_nonempty_iff, IsConnected, isPreconnected_connectedComponentIn,
and_true]
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsPreconnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x := fun _z hz => mem_sUnion_of_mem hz ⟨H1, H2⟩
theorem IsPreconnected.subset_connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ connectedComponentIn F x := by
have : IsPreconnected (((↑) : F → α) ⁻¹' s) := by
refine IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPreconnected_image.mp ?_
rwa [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
have h2xs : (⟨x, hsF hxs⟩ : F) ∈ (↑) ⁻¹' s := by
rw [mem_preimage]
exact hxs
have := this.subset_connectedComponent h2xs
rw [connectedComponentIn_eq_image (hsF hxs)]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (image_subset _ this)
rw [Subtype.image_preimage_coe, inter_eq_right.mpr hsF]
theorem IsConnected.subset_connectedComponent {x : α} {s : Set α} (H1 : IsConnected s)
(H2 : x ∈ s) : s ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
| H1.2.subset_connectedComponent H2
theorem IsPreconnected.connectedComponentIn {x : α} {F : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected F)
(hx : x ∈ F) : connectedComponentIn F x = F :=
(connectedComponentIn_subset F x).antisymm (h.subset_connectedComponentIn hx subset_rfl)
theorem connectedComponent_eq {x y : α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponent x) :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset (isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent
(Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset mem_connectedComponent
(isConnected_connectedComponent.subset_connectedComponent h)))
theorem connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem {x y : α} :
connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y ↔ x ∈ connectedComponent y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_connectedComponent, fun h => (connectedComponent_eq h).symm⟩
theorem connectedComponentIn_eq {x y : α} {F : Set α} (h : y ∈ connectedComponentIn F x) :
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 534 | 551 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Defs
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset `s`
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by `sSup s` and `sInf s`.
Typical examples are `ℝ`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ` with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We express these using the `BddAbove` and `BddBelow` predicates, which we use to prove
most useful properties of `sSup` and `sInf` in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix `sInf` and `sSup` in the statements by `c`, giving `csInf` and `csSup`.
For instance, `sInf_le` is a statement in complete lattices ensuring `sInf s ≤ x`,
while `csInf_le` is the same statement in conditionally complete lattices
with an additional assumption that `s` is bounded below.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of `sSup` and `sInf` from a preorder `α` to `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
-/
variable [Preorder α]
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instSupSet [SupSet α] :
SupSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S =>
if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else if BddAbove ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α) then
↑(sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ (a : WithTop α)) ⁻¹' S : Set α)) else ⊤⟩
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instInfSet [InfSet α] : InfSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S => if S ⊆ {⊤} ∨ ¬BddBelow S then ⊤ else ↑(sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α))⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instSupSet [SupSet α] : SupSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instInfSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instInfSet [InfSet α] :
InfSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instSupSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup⟩
theorem WithTop.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ⊤ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddAbove ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithTop.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊤}) (h's : BddBelow s) :
sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
if_neg <| by simp [hs, h's]
theorem WithBot.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ⊥ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddBelow ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithBot.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊥}) (h's : BddAbove s) :
sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
WithTop.sInf_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[simp]
theorem WithTop.sInf_empty [InfSet α] : sInf (∅ : Set (WithTop α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos <| by simp
theorem WithTop.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with h1 | h2
· cases h1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· exact (h2 (Monotone.map_bddBelow coe_mono h's)).elim
· rw [preimage_image_eq]
exact Option.some_injective _
theorem WithTop.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
change _ = ite _ _ _
rw [if_neg, preimage_image_eq, if_pos hs]
· exact Option.some_injective _
· rintro ⟨x, _, ⟨⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem WithBot.sSup_empty [SupSet α] : sSup (∅ : Set (WithBot α)) = ⊥ :=
WithTop.sInf_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sInf' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sSup' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
end
instance ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] :
LinearOrder α :=
{ ‹ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α› with
min_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂]
max_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂] }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A complete lattice is a conditionally complete lattice, as there are no restrictions
on the properties of sInf and sSup in a complete lattice. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice α :=
{ ‹CompleteLattice α› with
le_csSup := by intros; apply le_sSup; assumption
csSup_le := by intros; apply sSup_le; assumption
csInf_le := by intros; apply sInf_le; assumption
le_csInf := by intros; apply le_sInf; assumption }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot {α : Type*}
[h : CompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α :=
{ CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice, h with
csSup_empty := sSup_empty
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderTop.bddAbove s)).elim
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderBot.bddBelow s)).elim }
namespace OrderDual
instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instInf α, OrderDual.instSup α, OrderDual.instLattice α with
le_csSup := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le (α := α)
csSup_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf (α := α)
le_csInf := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le (α := α)
csInf_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup (α := α) }
instance (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instConditionallyCompleteLattice α, OrderDual.instLinearOrder α with
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow (α := α)
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove (α := α) }
end OrderDual
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_csSup (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : a ≤ sSup s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup s a h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_le (h₁ : BddBelow s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : a ≤ sInf s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csSup_of_le (hs : BddAbove s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_csSup hs hb)
theorem csInf_le_of_le (hs : BddBelow s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (csInf_le hs hb) h
theorem csSup_le_csSup (ht : BddAbove t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
csSup_le hs fun _ ha => le_csSup ht (h ha)
theorem csInf_le_csInf (ht : BddBelow t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_csInf hs fun _ ha => csInf_le ht (h ha)
theorem le_csSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le hs hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem csInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_csInf hs hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => csInf_le h⟩
theorem isLUB_csSup (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ => le_csSup H, fun _ => csSup_le ne⟩
theorem isGLB_csInf (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => csInf_le H, fun _ => le_csInf ne⟩
theorem IsLUB.csSup_eq (H : IsLUB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sSup s = a :=
(isLUB_csSup ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A greatest element of a set is the supremum of this set. -/
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_eq (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s = a :=
H.isLUB.csSup_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_mem (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s ∈ s :=
H.csSup_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem IsGLB.csInf_eq (H : IsGLB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = a :=
(isGLB_csInf ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A least element of a set is the infimum of this set. -/
theorem IsLeast.csInf_eq (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s = a :=
H.isGLB.csInf_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsLeast.csInf_mem (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s ∈ s :=
H.csInf_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem subset_Icc_csInf_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) : s ⊆ Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
fun _ hx => ⟨csInf_le hb hx, le_csSup ha hx⟩
theorem csSup_le_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup hs hb)
theorem le_csInf_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_csInf hs hb)
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sSup (lowerBounds s) = sInf s :=
(isLUB_csSup h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isGLB_csInf hs h).isLUB
theorem csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sInf (upperBounds s) = sSup s :=
(isGLB_csInf h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isLUB_csSup hs h).isGLB
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddBelow (range f)) :
sSup (lowerBounds (range f)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem csInf_upperBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
sInf (upperBounds (range f)) = ⨆ i, f i :=
csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) (hs : BddBelow s) : x ∉ s :=
fun hx => lt_irrefl _ (h.trans_le (csInf_le hs hx))
theorem not_mem_of_csSup_lt {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : sSup s < x) (hs : BddAbove s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (hs : s.Nonempty) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(H' : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(eq_of_le_of_not_lt (csSup_le hs H)) fun hb =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := H' _ hb
lt_irrefl _ <| ha'.trans_le <| le_csSup ⟨b, H⟩ ha
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
s.Nonempty → (∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- `b < sSup s` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, when `s` is bounded above.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness above for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem lt_csSup_of_lt (hs : BddAbove s) (ha : a ∈ s) (h : b < a) : b < sSup s :=
lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_csSup hs ha)
/-- `sInf s < b` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, when `s` is bounded below.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness below for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem csInf_lt_of_lt : BddBelow s → a ∈ s → a < b → sInf s < b :=
lt_csSup_of_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If all elements of a nonempty set `s` are less than or equal to all elements
of a nonempty set `t`, then there exists an element between these sets. -/
theorem exists_between_of_forall_le (sne : s.Nonempty) (tne : t.Nonempty)
(hst : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : (upperBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t).Nonempty :=
⟨sInf t, fun x hx => le_csInf tne <| hst x hx, fun _ hy => csInf_le (sne.mono hst) hy⟩
/-- The supremum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_singleton (a : α) : sSup {a} = a :=
isGreatest_singleton.csSup_eq
/-- The infimum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_singleton (a : α) : sInf {a} = a :=
isLeast_singleton.csInf_eq
theorem csSup_pair (a b : α) : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair _ _ a b).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
theorem csInf_pair (a b : α) : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair _ _ a b).csInf_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
/-- If a set is bounded below and above, and nonempty, its infimum is less than or equal to
its supremum. -/
theorem csInf_le_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_csInf ne hb) (isLUB_csSup ne ha) ne
/-- The `sSup` of a union of two sets is the max of the suprema of each subset, under the
assumptions that all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_union (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddAbove t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).union (isLUB_csSup tne ht)).csSup_eq sne.inl
/-- The `sInf` of a union of two sets is the min of the infima of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem csInf_union (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddBelow t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
csSup_union (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne ht tne
/-- The supremum of an intersection of two sets is bounded by the minimum of the suprema of each
set, if all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_inter_le (hs : BddAbove s) (ht : BddAbove t) (hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
(csSup_le hst) fun _ hx => le_inf (le_csSup hs hx.1) (le_csSup ht hx.2)
/-- The infimum of an intersection of two sets is bounded below by the maximum of the
infima of each set, if all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem le_csInf_inter :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
csSup_inter_le (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- The supremum of `insert a s` is the maximum of `a` and the supremum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded above. -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_insert (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).insert a).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty a s)
/-- The infimum of `insert a s` is the minimum of `a` and the infimum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded below. -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_insert (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
csSup_insert (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sInf (Icc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ici : sInf (Ici a) = a :=
isLeast_Ici.csInf_eq
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ico (h : a < b) : sInf (Ico a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioc [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sInf (Ioi a) = a :=
csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt nonempty_Ioi (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioo a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioo h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sSup (Icc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ico [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ico a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ico h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iic : sSup (Iic a) = a :=
isGreatest_Iic.csSup_eq
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iio [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sSup (Iio a) = a :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt nonempty_Iio (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa [and_comm] using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioc (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioo a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioo h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that
1) `b` is an upper bound
2) every other upper bound `b'` satisfies `b ≤ b'`. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_is_forall_le_of_forall_le_imp_ge (hs : s.Nonempty) (h_is_ub : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h_b_le_ub : ∀ ub, (∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ ub) → b ≤ ub) : sSup s = b :=
(csSup_le hs h_is_ub).antisymm ((h_b_le_ub _) fun _ => le_csSup ⟨b, h_is_ub⟩)
lemma sup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] (h : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_csSup (OrderTop.bddAbove s) h
lemma inf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] (h : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
instance Pi.conditionallyCompleteLattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, ConditionallyCompleteLattice (α i)] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (∀ i, α i) :=
{ Pi.instLattice, Pi.supSet, Pi.infSet with
le_csSup := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
le_csSup ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
csSup_le := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(csSup_le (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i
csInf_le := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
csInf_le ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
le_csInf := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(le_csInf (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i }
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- When `b < sSup s`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : b < sSup s) : ∃ a ∈ s, b < a := by
contrapose! hb
exact csSup_le hs hb
/-- When `sInf s < b`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_csInf_lt (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : sInf s < b) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) hs hb
theorem lt_csSup_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_csSup hs hb
theorem csInf_lt_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s < a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_csInf hs hb
@[simp] lemma csSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs
@[simp] lemma ciSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup ∅ :=
csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
lemma csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup univ := by
rw [csSup_of_not_bddAbove hs, csSup_of_not_bddAbove (s := univ)]
contrapose! hs
exact hs.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma ciSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove hf
@[simp] lemma csInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs
@[simp] lemma ciInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf ∅ :=
csInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
lemma csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
lemma ciInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf univ :=
csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same supremum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup s = sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|s_ne
· have : t = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun y yt ↦ by simpa using ht y yt)
rw [this]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with rfl|t_ne
· have : s = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x xs ↦ by simpa using hs x xs)
rw [this]
by_cases B : BddAbove s ∨ BddAbove t
· have Bs : BddAbove s := by
rcases B with hB|⟨b, hb⟩
· exact hB
· refine ⟨b, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (hb hy)
have Bt : BddAbove t := by
rcases B with ⟨b, hb⟩|hB
· refine ⟨b, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, hx, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (hb hx)
· exact hB
apply le_antisymm
· apply csSup_le s_ne (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, yt, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (le_csSup Bt yt)
· apply csSup_le t_ne (fun y hy ↦ ?_)
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, xs, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (le_csSup Bs xs)
· simp [csSup_of_not_bddAbove, (not_or.1 B).1, (not_or.1 B).2]
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same infimum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csInf_eq_csInf_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf s = sInf t :=
csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ht
lemma sSup_iUnion_Iic (f : ι → α) : sSup (⋃ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = ⨆ i, f i := by
apply csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le
· rintro x ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_range_self _, hi⟩
· rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_iUnion_of_mem i le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
lemma sInf_iUnion_Ici (f : ι → α) : sInf (⋃ (i : ι), Ici (f i)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
sSup_iUnion_Iic (α := αᵒᵈ) f
theorem csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) hs
theorem csSup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
open Function
variable [WellFoundedLT α]
theorem sInf_eq_argmin_on (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = argminOn id s hs :=
IsLeast.csInf_eq ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun _ ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem isLeast_csInf (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLeast s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_eq_argmin_on hs]
exact ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun a ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff' (hs : s.Nonempty) : b ≤ sInf s ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
le_isGLB_iff (isLeast_csInf hs).isGLB
theorem csInf_mem (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s :=
(isLeast_csInf hs).1
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
theorem Monotone.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
/-!
### Lemmas about a conditionally complete linear order with bottom element
In this case we have `Sup ∅ = ⊥`, so we can drop some `Nonempty`/`Set.Nonempty` assumptions.
-/
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
@[simp]
theorem csInf_univ [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [OrderBot α] : sInf (univ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.csInf_eq
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem csSup_empty : (sSup ∅ : α) = ⊥ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.csSup_empty
theorem isLUB_csSup' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp only [csSup_empty, isLUB_empty]
· exact isLUB_csSup hne hs
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `csSup_le_iff`. -/
theorem csSup_le_iff' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) {a : α} : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup' hs)
theorem csSup_le' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ upperBounds s) : sSup s ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' ⟨a, h⟩).2 h
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `lt_csSup_iff`. -/
theorem lt_csSup_iff' (hb : BddAbove s) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
simpa only [not_le, not_forall₂, exists_prop] using (csSup_le_iff' hb).not
theorem le_csSup_iff' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : BddAbove s) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le' hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff'' {s : Set α} {a : α} (ne : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b : α, b ∈ s → a ≤ b :=
le_csInf_iff (OrderBot.bddBelow _) ne
theorem csInf_le' (h : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a := csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) h
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a < sSup s) : ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
contrapose! h
exact csSup_le' h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf' {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf h (OrderBot.bddBelow s)
theorem csInf_le_csInf' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : t.Nonempty) (h₂ : t ⊆ s) : sInf s ≤ sInf t :=
csInf_le_csInf (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le_csSup' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove t) (h₂ : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl | h
· rw [csSup_empty]
exact bot_le
· exact csSup_le_csSup h₁ h h₂
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
namespace WithTop
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α]
/-- The `sSup` of a non-empty set is its least upper bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isLUB_sSup' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· contradiction
apply coe_le_coe.2
exact le_csSup h₂ ha
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact False.elim (not_top_le_coe a (ha h₁))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exact absurd hb h₁
· exact ⟨b, hb⟩
· intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_rfl
· exfalso
apply h₂
use b
intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs
· simp [sSup]
· exact isLUB_sSup' hs
/-- The `sInf` of a bounded-below set is its greatest lower bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isGLB_sInf' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro a ha
exact top_le_iff.2 (Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (h ha))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csInf_le ?_ ha)
rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exfalso
apply h
intro c hc
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← top_le_iff]
exact hb hc
use b
intro c hc
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb hc)
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exfalso
apply h
intro b hb
exact Set.mem_singleton_iff.2 (top_le_iff.1 (ha hb))
· refine coe_le_coe.2 (le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· classical
contrapose! h
rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact mem_singleton ⊤
· exact (not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.2 h ⟨a, ha⟩).elim
· intro b hb
rw [← coe_le_coe]
exact ha hb
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
by_cases hs : BddBelow s
· exact isGLB_sInf' hs
· exfalso
apply hs
use ⊥
intro _ _
exact bot_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop α) where
__ := linearOrder
__ := LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra
le_sSup s := (isLUB_sSup s).1
sSup_le s := (isLUB_sSup s).2
le_sInf s := (isGLB_sInf s).2
sInf_le s := (isGLB_sInf s).1
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sSup'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {s : Set α} (hb : BddAbove s) : ↑(sSup s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sSup' hb, sSup_image]
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sInf'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sInf' hs h's, sInf_image]
end WithTop
namespace Monotone
variable [Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (h_mono : Monotone f)
include h_mono
/-! A monotone function into a conditionally complete lattice preserves the ordering properties of
`sSup` and `sInf`. -/
theorem le_csSup_image {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddAbove s) :
f c ≤ sSup (f '' s) :=
le_csSup (map_bddAbove h_mono h_bdd) (mem_image_of_mem f hcs)
theorem csSup_image_le {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ upperBounds s) :
sSup (f '' s) ≤ f B :=
csSup_le (Nonempty.image f hs) (h_mono.mem_upperBounds_image hB)
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem csInf_image_le {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddBelow s) :
sInf (f '' s) ≤ f c := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact le_csSup_image (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hcs h_bdd
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem le_csInf_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ lowerBounds s) :
f B ≤ sInf (f '' s) := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact csSup_image_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hs hB
end Monotone
lemma MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddBelow (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf (f '' s) = sInf (f '' t) := by
obtain rfl | hs := Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s
· obtain rfl : t = ∅ := by simpa [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] using h
rfl
apply le_antisymm _ (csInf_le_csInf ht (hs.image _) (image_subset _ hst))
refine le_csInf ((hs.mono hst).image f) ?_
simp only [mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro a ha
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hxa⟩ := h a ha
exact csInf_le_of_le (ht.mono (image_subset _ hst)) ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩ (hf (hst hxs) ha hxa)
lemma MonotoneOn.csSup_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
[Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
{s t : Set α} (ht : BddAbove (f '' t)) (hf : MonotoneOn f t)
(hst : s ⊆ t) (h : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup (f '' s) = sSup (f '' t) :=
MonotoneOn.csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) ht hf.dual hst h
/-!
### Supremum/infimum of `Set.image2`
A collection of lemmas showing what happens to the suprema/infima of `s` and `t` when mapped under
a binary function whose partial evaluations are lower/upper adjoints of Galois connections.
-/
section
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
variable {l u : α → β → γ} {l₁ u₁ : β → γ → α} {l₂ u₂ : α → γ → β}
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s)
(ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddAbove t) : sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sSup t) := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [csSup_le_iff (hs₁.image2 (fun _ => (h₁ _).monotone_l) (fun _ => (h₂ _).monotone_l) ht₁)
(hs₀.image2 ht₀),
forall_mem_image2, forall₂_swap, (h₂ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff ht₁ ht₀]
simp_rw [← (h₂ _).le_iff_le, (h₁ _).le_iff_le, csSup_le_iff hs₁ hs₀]
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b) (u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a) (u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (swap l b ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₁ b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l a ∘ ofDual) (toDual ∘ u₂ a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sSup (image2 l s t) = l (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sInf t) :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) (u₁ := l₁) (u₂ := l₂)
(fun _ => (h₁ _).dual) fun _ => (h₂ _).dual
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (l₁ b) (swap u b))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₂ a) (u a ∘ ofDual)) :
s.Nonempty → BddBelow s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sInf s) (sSup t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csSup_csInf (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₁ b) (swap u b ∘ ofDual))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (l₂ a) (u a)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddBelow t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sSup s) (sInf t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (h₁ : ∀ b, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₁ b) (swap u b ∘ ofDual))
(h₂ : ∀ a, GaloisConnection (toDual ∘ l₂ a) (u a ∘ ofDual)) :
s.Nonempty → BddAbove s → t.Nonempty → BddAbove t → sInf (image2 u s t) = u (sSup s) (sSup t) :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
end
section WithTopBot
/-!
### Complete lattice structure on `WithTop (WithBot α)`
If `α` is a `ConditionallyCompleteLattice`, then we show that `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
also inherit the structure of conditionally complete lattices. Furthermore, we show
that `WithTop (WithBot α)` and `WithBot (WithTop α)` naturally inherit the structure of a
complete lattice. Note that for `α` a conditionally complete lattice, `sSup` and `sInf` both return
junk values for sets which are empty or unbounded. The extension of `sSup` to `WithTop α` fixes
the unboundedness problem and the extension to `WithBot α` fixes the problem with
the empty set.
This result can be used to show that the extended reals `[-∞, ∞]` are a complete linear order.
-/
/-- Adding a top element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (WithTop α) :=
{ lattice, instSupSet, instInfSet with
le_csSup := fun _ a _ haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS
csSup_le := fun _ _ hS haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' hS).2 haS
csInf_le := fun _ _ hS haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' hS).1 haS
le_csInf := fun _ a _ haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS }
/-- Adding a bottom element to a conditionally complete lattice
gives a conditionally complete lattice -/
noncomputable instance WithBot.conditionallyCompleteLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (WithBot α) :=
{ WithBot.lattice with
le_csSup := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).csInf_le
csSup_le := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_csInf
csInf_le := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_csSup
le_csInf := (WithTop.conditionallyCompleteLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).csSup_le }
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice (WithTop (WithBot α)) :=
{ instInfSet, instSupSet, boundedOrder, lattice with
le_sSup := fun _ a haS => (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' ⟨a, haS⟩).1 haS
sSup_le := fun S a ha => by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· show ite _ _ _ ≤ a
simp [h]
· exact (WithTop.isLUB_sSup' h).2 ha
sInf_le := fun S a haS =>
show ite _ _ _ ≤ a by
simp only [OrderBot.bddBelow, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h₁
· cases a
· exact le_rfl
cases h₁ haS
· cases a
· exact le_top
· apply WithTop.coe_le_coe.2
refine csInf_le ?_ haS
use ⊥
intro b _
exact bot_le
le_sInf := fun _ a haS => (WithTop.isGLB_sInf' ⟨a, haS⟩).2 haS }
noncomputable instance WithTop.WithBot.completeLinearOrder {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop (WithBot α)) :=
-- FIXME: Spread notation doesn't work
{ completeLattice, linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
noncomputable instance WithBot.WithTop.completeLattice {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] : CompleteLattice (WithBot (WithTop α)) :=
{ instInfSet, instSupSet, instBoundedOrder, lattice with
le_sSup := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf_le
sSup_le := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_sInf
sInf_le := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).le_sSup
le_sInf := (WithTop.WithBot.completeLattice (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup_le }
noncomputable instance WithBot.WithTop.completeLinearOrder {α : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : CompleteLinearOrder (WithBot (WithTop α)) :=
{ completeLattice, linearOrder, LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra with }
end WithTopBot
| Mathlib/Order/ConditionallyCompleteLattice/Basic.lean | 1,034 | 1,037 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
| @[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 274 | 274 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.CompactConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equiv
/-!
# Ascoli Theorem
In this file, we prove the general **Arzela-Ascoli theorem**, and various related statements about
the topology of equicontinuous subsetes of `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α`, where `X` is a topological space, `𝔖` is
a family of compact subsets of `X`, and `α` is a uniform space.
## Main statements
* If `X` is a compact space, then the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence coincide on equicontinuous subsets. This is the key fact that makes equicontinuity
important in functional analysis. We state various versions of it:
- as an equality of `UniformSpace`s: `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`
- in terms of `IsUniformInducing`: `Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi`
- in terms of `IsInducing`: `Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi`
- in terms of convergence along a filter: `Equicontinuous.tendsto_uniformFun_iff_pi`
* As a consequence, if `𝔖` is a family of compact subsets of `X`, then the uniform structures of
uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence on `⋃₀ 𝔖` coincide on equicontinuous
subsets. Again, we prove multiple variations:
- as an equality of `UniformSpace`s: `EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq`
- in terms of `IsUniformInducing`: `EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
- in terms of `IsInducing`: `EquicontinuousOn.inducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
- in terms of convergence along a filter: `EquicontinuousOn.tendsto_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'`
* The **Arzela-Ascoli theorem** follows from the previous fact and Tykhonov's theorem.
All of its variations can be found under the `ArzelaAscoli` namespace.
## Implementation details
* The statements in this file may be a bit daunting because we prove everything for families and
embeddings instead of subspaces with the subspace topology. This is done because, in practice,
one would rarely work with `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` directly, so we need to provide API for bringing back the
statements to various other types, such as `C(X, Y)` or `E →L[𝕜] F`. To counteract this, all
statements (as well as most proofs!) are documented quite thoroughly.
* A lot of statements assume `∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K` instead of the more natural
`EquicontinuousOn F (⋃₀ 𝔖)`. This is in order to keep the most generality, as the first statement
is strictly weaker.
* In Bourbaki, the usual Arzela-Ascoli compactness theorem follows from a similar total boundedness
result. Here we go directly for the compactness result, which is the most useful in practice, but
this will be an easy addition/refactor if we ever need it.
## TODO
* Prove that, on an equicontinuous family, pointwise convergence and pointwise convergence on a
dense subset coincide, and deduce metrizability criterions for equicontinuous subsets.
* Prove the total boundedness version of the theorem
* Prove the converse statement: if a subset of `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` is compact, then it is equicontinuous
on each `K ∈ 𝔖`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
open Set Filter Uniformity Topology Function UniformConvergence
variable {ι X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [UniformSpace α] {F : ι → X → α}
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence induce the same uniform structure on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
Consider using `Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi` and
`Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi` instead, to avoid rewriting instances. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq [CompactSpace X] (F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
(UniformFun.uniformSpace X α).comap F =
(Pi.uniformSpace _).comap F := by
-- The `≤` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm (UniformSpace.comap_mono UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun) ?_
-- A bit of rewriting to get a nice intermediate statement.
simp_rw [UniformSpace.comap, UniformSpace.le_def, uniformity_comap, Pi.uniformity,
Filter.comap_iInf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
refine ((UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity X α).comap (Prod.map F F)).ge_iff.mpr ?_
-- Core of the proof: we need to show that, for any entourage `U` in `α`,
-- the set `𝐓(U) := {(i,j) : ι × ι | ∀ x : X, (F i x, F j x) ∈ U}` belongs to the filter
-- `⨅ x, comap ((i,j) ↦ (F i x, F j x)) (𝓤 α)`.
-- In other words, we have to show that it contains a finite intersection of
-- sets of the form `𝐒(V, x) := {(i,j) : ι × ι | (F i x, F j x) ∈ V}` for some
-- `x : X` and `V ∈ 𝓤 α`.
intro U hU
-- We will do an `ε/3` argument, so we start by choosing a symmetric entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 α`
-- such that `V ○ V ○ V ⊆ U`.
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, Vsymm, hVU⟩
-- Set `Ω x := {y | ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ V}`. The equicontinuity of `F` guarantees that
-- each `Ω x` is a neighborhood of `x`.
let Ω x : Set X := {y | ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ V}
-- Hence, by compactness of `X`, we can find some `A ⊆ X` finite such that the `Ω a`s for `a ∈ A`
-- still cover `X`.
rcases CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover Ω (fun x ↦ F_eqcont x V hV) with ⟨A, Acover⟩
-- We now claim that `⋂ a ∈ A, 𝐒(V, a) ⊆ 𝐓(U)`.
have : (⋂ a ∈ A, {ij : ι × ι | (F ij.1 a, F ij.2 a) ∈ V}) ⊆
(Prod.map F F) ⁻¹' UniformFun.gen X α U := by
-- Given `(i, j) ∈ ⋂ a ∈ A, 𝐒(V, a)` and `x : X`, we have to prove that `(F i x, F j x) ∈ U`.
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij x
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hij
-- We know that `x ∈ Ω a` for some `a ∈ A`, so that both `(F i x, F i a)` and `(F j a, F j x)`
-- are in `V`.
rcases mem_iUnion₂.mp (Acover.symm.subset <| mem_univ x) with ⟨a, ha, hax⟩
-- Since `(i, j) ∈ 𝐒(V, a)` we also have `(F i a, F j a) ∈ V`, and finally we get
-- `(F i x, F j x) ∈ V ○ V ○ V ⊆ U`.
exact hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel (prodMk_mem_compRel
(Vsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hax i)) (hij a ha)) (hax j))
-- This completes the proof.
exact mem_of_superset
(A.iInter_mem_sets.mpr fun x _ ↦ mem_iInf_of_mem x <| preimage_mem_comap hV) this
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the uniform structures of uniform convergence and pointwise
convergence induce the same uniform structure on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a version of `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq` stated in terms of `IsUniformInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma Equicontinuous.isUniformInducing_uniformFun_iff_pi [UniformSpace ι] [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
IsUniformInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ↔ IsUniformInducing F := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace, isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace,
← F_eqcont.comap_uniformFun_eq]
rfl
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, and `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family. Then, the topologies of uniform convergence and pointwise convergence induce
the same topology on `ι`.
In other words, pointwise convergence and uniform convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a consequence of `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`, stated in terms of `IsInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma Equicontinuous.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi [TopologicalSpace ι] [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) :
IsInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ↔ IsInducing F := by
rw [isInducing_iff, isInducing_iff]
change (_ = (UniformFun.uniformSpace X α |>.comap F |>.toTopologicalSpace)) ↔
(_ = (Pi.uniformSpace _ |>.comap F |>.toTopologicalSpace))
rw [F_eqcont.comap_uniformFun_eq]
/-- Let `X` be a compact topological space, `α` a uniform space, `F : ι → (X → α)` an
equicontinuous family, and `ℱ` a filter on `ι`. Then, `F` tends *uniformly* to `f : X → α` along
`ℱ` iff it tends to `f` *pointwise* along `ℱ`. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.tendsto_uniformFun_iff_pi [CompactSpace X]
(F_eqcont : Equicontinuous F) (ℱ : Filter ι) (f : X → α) :
Tendsto (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ F) ℱ (𝓝 <| UniformFun.ofFun f) ↔
Tendsto F ℱ (𝓝 f) := by
-- Assume `ℱ` is non trivial.
rcases ℱ.eq_or_neBot with rfl | ℱ_ne
· simp
constructor <;> intro H
-- The forward direction is always true, the interesting part is the converse.
· exact UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun.continuous.tendsto _|>.comp H
-- To prove it, assume that `F` tends to `f` *pointwise* along `ℱ`.
· set S : Set (X → α) := closure (range F)
set 𝒢 : Filter S := comap (↑) (map F ℱ)
-- We would like to use `Equicontinuous.comap_uniformFun_eq`, but applying it to `F` is not
-- enough since `f` has no reason to be in the range of `F`.
-- Instead, we will apply it to the inclusion `(↑) : S → (X → α)` where `S` is the closure of
-- the range of `F` *for the product topology*.
-- We know that `S` is still equicontinuous...
have hS : S.Equicontinuous := closure' (by rwa [equicontinuous_iff_range] at F_eqcont)
continuous_id
-- ... hence, as announced, the product topology and uniform convergence topology
-- coincide on `S`.
have ind : IsInducing (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (↑) : S → X →ᵤ α) :=
hS.inducing_uniformFun_iff_pi.mpr ⟨rfl⟩
-- By construction, `f` is in `S`.
have f_mem : f ∈ S := mem_closure_of_tendsto H range_mem_map
-- To conclude, we just have to translate our hypothesis and goal as statements about
-- `S`, on which we know the two topologies at play coincide.
-- For this, we define a filter on `S` by `𝒢 := comap (↑) (map F ℱ)`, and note that
-- it satisfies `map (↑) 𝒢 = map F ℱ`. Thus, both our hypothesis and our goal
-- can be rewritten as `𝒢 ≤ 𝓝 f`, where the neighborhood filter in the RHS corresponds
-- to one of the two topologies at play on `S`. Since they coincide, we are done.
have h𝒢ℱ : map (↑) 𝒢 = map F ℱ := Filter.map_comap_of_mem
(Subtype.range_coe ▸ mem_of_superset range_mem_map subset_closure)
have H' : Tendsto id 𝒢 (𝓝 ⟨f, f_mem⟩) := by
rwa [tendsto_id', nhds_induced, ← map_le_iff_le_comap, h𝒢ℱ]
rwa [ind.tendsto_nhds_iff, comp_id, ← tendsto_map'_iff, h𝒢ℱ] at H'
/-- Let `X` be a topological space, `𝔖` a family of compact subsets of `X`, `α` a uniform space,
and `F : ι → (X → α)` a family which is equicontinuous on each `K ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the uniform
structures of uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence on `⋃₀ 𝔖` induce the same
uniform structure on `ι`.
In particular, pointwise convergence and compact convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
Consider using `EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'` and
`EquicontinuousOn.inducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'` instead to avoid rewriting instances,
as well as their unprimed versions in case `𝔖` covers `X`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq {𝔖 : Set (Set X)} (𝔖_compact : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, IsCompact K)
(F_eqcont : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K) :
(UniformOnFun.uniformSpace X α 𝔖).comap F =
(Pi.uniformSpace _).comap ((⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict ∘ F) := by
-- Recall that the uniform structure on `X →ᵤ[𝔖] α` is the one induced by all the maps
-- `K.restrict : (X →ᵤ[𝔖] α) → (K →ᵤ α)` for `K ∈ 𝔖`. Its pullback along `F`, which is
-- the LHS of our goal, is thus the uniform structure induced by the maps
-- `K.restrict ∘ F : ι → (K →ᵤ α)` for `K ∈ 𝔖`.
have H1 : (UniformOnFun.uniformSpace X α 𝔖).comap F =
⨅ (K ∈ 𝔖), (UniformFun.uniformSpace _ _).comap (K.restrict ∘ F) := by
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, UniformSpace.comap_iInf, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap,
UniformFun.ofFun, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, UniformOnFun.toFun, UniformOnFun.ofFun, Function.comp_def,
UniformFun, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk]
-- Now, note that a similar fact is true for the uniform structure on `X → α` induced by
-- the map `(⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict : (X → α) → ((⋃₀ 𝔖) → α)`: it is equal to the one induced by
-- all maps `K.restrict : (X → α) → (K → α)` for `K ∈ 𝔖`, which means that the RHS of our
-- goal is the uniform structure induced by the maps `K.restrict ∘ F : ι → (K → α)` for `K ∈ 𝔖`.
have H2 : (Pi.uniformSpace _).comap ((⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict ∘ F) =
⨅ (K ∈ 𝔖), (Pi.uniformSpace _).comap (K.restrict ∘ F) := by
simp_rw [UniformSpace.comap_comap, Pi.uniformSpace_comap_restrict_sUnion (fun _ ↦ α) 𝔖,
UniformSpace.comap_iInf]
-- But, for `K ∈ 𝔖` fixed, we know that the uniform structures of `K →ᵤ α` and `K → α`
-- induce, via the equicontinuous family `K.restrict ∘ F`, the same uniform structure on `ι`.
have H3 : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, (UniformFun.uniformSpace K α).comap (K.restrict ∘ F) =
(Pi.uniformSpace _).comap (K.restrict ∘ F) := fun K hK ↦ by
have : CompactSpace K := isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp (𝔖_compact K hK)
exact (equicontinuous_restrict_iff _ |>.mpr <| F_eqcont K hK).comap_uniformFun_eq
-- Combining these three facts completes the proof.
simp_rw [H1, H2, iInf_congr fun K ↦ iInf_congr fun hK ↦ H3 K hK]
/-- Let `X` be a topological space, `𝔖` a family of compact subsets of `X`, `α` a uniform space,
and `F : ι → (X → α)` a family which is equicontinuous on each `K ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the uniform
structures of uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence on `⋃₀ 𝔖` induce the same
uniform structure on `ι`.
In particular, pointwise convergence and compact convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a version of `EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq` stated in terms of `IsUniformInducing`
for convenuence. -/
lemma EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi' [UniformSpace ι]
{𝔖 : Set (Set X)} (𝔖_compact : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, IsCompact K)
(F_eqcont : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K) :
IsUniformInducing (UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖 ∘ F) ↔
IsUniformInducing ((⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict ∘ F) := by
rw [isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace, isUniformInducing_iff_uniformSpace,
← EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq 𝔖_compact F_eqcont]
rfl
/-- Let `X` be a topological space, `𝔖` a covering of `X` by compact subsets, `α` a uniform space,
and `F : ι → (X → α)` a family which is equicontinuous on each `K ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the uniform
structures of uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence induce the same
uniform structure on `ι`.
This is a specialization of `EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi'` to
the case where `𝔖` covers `X`. -/
lemma EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi [UniformSpace ι]
{𝔖 : Set (Set X)} (𝔖_covers : ⋃₀ 𝔖 = univ) (𝔖_compact : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, IsCompact K)
(F_eqcont : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K) :
IsUniformInducing (UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖 ∘ F) ↔
IsUniformInducing F := by
rw [eq_univ_iff_forall] at 𝔖_covers
-- This obviously follows from the previous lemma, we formalize it by going through the
-- isomorphism of uniform spaces between `(⋃₀ 𝔖) → α` and `X → α`.
let φ : ((⋃₀ 𝔖) → α) ≃ᵤ (X → α) := UniformEquiv.piCongrLeft (β := fun _ ↦ α)
(Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv 𝔖_covers)
rw [EquicontinuousOn.isUniformInducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi' 𝔖_compact F_eqcont,
show restrict (⋃₀ 𝔖) ∘ F = φ.symm ∘ F by rfl]
exact ⟨fun H ↦ φ.isUniformInducing.comp H, fun H ↦ φ.symm.isUniformInducing.comp H⟩
/-- Let `X` be a topological space, `𝔖` a family of compact subsets of `X`, `α` a uniform space,
| and `F : ι → (X → α)` a family which is equicontinuous on each `K ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the topologies
of uniform convergence on `𝔖` and pointwise convergence on `⋃₀ 𝔖` induce the same topology on `ι`.
In particular, pointwise convergence and compact convergence coincide on an equicontinuous
subset of `X → α`.
This is a consequence of `EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq` stated in terms of `IsInducing`
for convenience. -/
lemma EquicontinuousOn.inducing_uniformOnFun_iff_pi' [TopologicalSpace ι]
{𝔖 : Set (Set X)} (𝔖_compact : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, IsCompact K)
(F_eqcont : ∀ K ∈ 𝔖, EquicontinuousOn F K) :
IsInducing (UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖 ∘ F) ↔
IsInducing ((⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict ∘ F) := by
rw [isInducing_iff, isInducing_iff]
change (_ = ((UniformOnFun.uniformSpace X α 𝔖).comap F).toTopologicalSpace) ↔
(_ = ((Pi.uniformSpace _).comap ((⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict ∘ F)).toTopologicalSpace)
rw [← EquicontinuousOn.comap_uniformOnFun_eq 𝔖_compact F_eqcont]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Ascoli.lean | 282 | 299 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
/-!
# Further lemmas for the Rational Numbers
-/
namespace Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast] at this; simp [this]
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
rcases e : a /. b with ⟨n, d, h, c⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.tdiv_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
theorem add_den_dvd_lcm (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den.lcm q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq, Nat.div_dvd_iff_dvd_mul (Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
(Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right (by simp)), ← Nat.gcd_mul_lcm,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right (Nat.lcm_ne_zero (by simp) (by simp)), Nat.dvd_gcd_iff]
refine ⟨?_, dvd_mul_right _ _⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs]
apply Int.dvd_add
<;> apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right <;> rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
<;> [exact Nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _; exact Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _]
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).num = q₁.num * q₂.num / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_den (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).den =
q₁.den * q₂.den / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num := by
rw [mul_num, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Int.ofNat_one, Int.ediv_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem mul_self_den (q : ℚ) : (q * q).den = q.den * q.den := by
rw [Rat.mul_den, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
theorem add_num_den (q r : ℚ) :
q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num : ℤ) /. (↑q.den * ↑r.den : ℤ) := by
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.den_pos
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.den_pos
conv_lhs => rw [← num_divInt_den q, ← num_divInt_den r, divInt_add_divInt _ _ hqd hrd]
rw [mul_comm r.num q.den]
theorem isSquare_iff {q : ℚ} : IsSquare q ↔ IsSquare q.num ∧ IsSquare q.den := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨qr, rfl⟩
rw [Rat.mul_self_num, mul_self_den]
simp only [IsSquare.mul_self, and_self]
· rintro ⟨⟨nr, hnr⟩, ⟨dr, hdr⟩⟩
refine ⟨nr / dr, ?_⟩
rw [div_mul_div_comm, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← hnr, ← hdr, num_div_den]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : IsSquare (n : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare n := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, num_natCast, den_natCast, IsSquare.one, and_true, Int.isSquare_natCast_iff]
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem isSquare_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} : IsSquare (z : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare z := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff, intCast_num, intCast_den, IsSquare.one, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem isSquare_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsSquare (ofNat(n) : ℚ) ↔ IsSquare (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
isSquare_natCast_iff
section Casts
theorem exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (n : ℤ) {d : ℤ} (d_ne_zero : d ≠ 0) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).num ∧ (d : ℤ) = c * ((n : ℚ) / d).den :=
haveI : (n : ℚ) / d = Rat.divInt n d := by rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div]
Rat.num_den_mk d_ne_zero this
theorem mul_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q * r).num * q.den * r.den = q.num * r.num * (q * r).den := by
let s := q.num * r.num /. (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.num) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
rw [Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_assoc, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_mul_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h, mul_comm, ← Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul, ← divInt_eq_div]
theorem add_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q + r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) * (q + r).den := by
let s := divInt (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) (q.den * r.den : ℤ)
have hs : (q.den * r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr (Nat.mul_pos q.pos r.pos)
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_mul_num, c_mul_den⟩⟩ :=
exists_eq_mul_div_num_and_eq_mul_div_den (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) hs
rw [c_mul_num, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
nth_rw 1 [c_mul_den]
repeat rw [Int.mul_assoc]
apply mul_eq_mul_left_iff.2
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro
have h : _ = s := divInt_add_divInt q.num r.num (mod_cast q.den_ne_zero) (mod_cast r.den_ne_zero)
rw [num_divInt_den, num_divInt_den] at h
rw [h]
rw [mul_comm]
apply Rat.eq_iff_mul_eq_mul.mp
rw [← divInt_eq_div]
theorem substr_num_den' (q r : ℚ) :
(q - r).num * q.den * r.den = (q.num * r.den - r.num * q.den) * (q - r).den := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_mul, ← num_neg_eq_neg_num, ← den_neg_eq_den r,
add_num_den' q (-r)]
end Casts
protected theorem inv_neg (q : ℚ) : (-q)⁻¹ = -q⁻¹ := by
rw [← num_divInt_den q]
simp only [Rat.neg_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', eq_self_iff_true, Rat.divInt_neg]
theorem num_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
(a / b : ℚ).num = a := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem den_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
((a / b : ℚ).den : ℤ) = b := by
lift b to ℕ using hb0.le
simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.ofNat_pos] at h hb0
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← mk_eq_divInt _ _ hb0.ne' h]
theorem div_int_inj {a b c d : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hd0 : 0 < d) (h1 : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs)
(h2 : Nat.Coprime c.natAbs d.natAbs) (h : (a : ℚ) / b = (c : ℚ) / d) : a = c ∧ b = d := by
apply And.intro
· rw [← num_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, num_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
· rw [← den_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, den_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_div_self (n : ℤ) : ((n / n : ℤ) : ℚ) = n / n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp only [Int.cast_zero, Int.zero_tdiv, zero_div, Int.ediv_zero]
· have : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by rwa [← coe_int_inj] at hn
simp only [Int.ediv_self hn, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff, div_self this]
@[norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div_self (n : ℕ) : ((n / n : ℕ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
intCast_div_self n
theorem intCast_div (a b : ℤ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℤ) : ℚ) = a / b := by
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [mul_comm b, Int.mul_ediv_assoc c (dvd_refl b), Int.cast_mul,
intCast_div_self, Int.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc]
theorem natCast_div (a b : ℕ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℕ) : ℚ) = a / b :=
intCast_div a b (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr h)
theorem den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℤ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m := by
replace hn : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := num_ne_zero.mp hn
constructor
· rw [Rat.den_eq_one_iff, eq_div_iff hn]
exact mod_cast (Dvd.intro_left _)
· exact (intCast_div _ _ · ▸ rfl)
theorem den_div_natCast_eq_one_iff (m n : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ((m : ℚ) / n).den = 1 ↔ n ∣ m :=
(den_div_intCast_eq_one_iff m n (Int.ofNat_ne_zero.mpr hn)).trans Int.ofNat_dvd
theorem inv_intCast_num_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply num_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_num_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_intCast_num_of_pos (mod_cast ha0 : 0 < (a : ℤ))
theorem inv_intCast_den_of_pos {a : ℤ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : ((a : ℚ)⁻¹.den : ℤ) = a := by
rw [← ofInt_eq_cast, ofInt, mk_eq_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', divInt_eq_div, Nat.cast_one]
apply den_div_eq_of_coprime ha0
rw [Int.natAbs_one]
exact Nat.coprime_one_left _
theorem inv_natCast_den_of_pos {a : ℕ} (ha0 : 0 < a) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = a := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, ← Int.cast_natCast a, inv_intCast_den_of_pos]
rwa [Int.natCast_pos]
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_num (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with lt | rfl | gt
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, -b = a := ⟨-a, a.neg_neg⟩
simp at lt
simp [Rat.inv_neg, inv_intCast_num_of_pos lt, Int.sign_eq_one_iff_pos.mpr lt]
· simp
· simp [inv_intCast_num_of_pos gt, Int.sign_eq_one_iff_pos.mpr gt]
@[simp]
theorem inv_natCast_num (a : ℕ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.num = Int.sign a :=
inv_intCast_num a
@[simp]
theorem inv_ofNat_num (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ℚ)⁻¹.num = 1 :=
inv_natCast_num_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_neZero a)
@[simp]
theorem inv_intCast_den (a : ℤ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = if a = 0 then 1 else a.natAbs := by
rw [← Int.ofNat_inj]
rcases lt_trichotomy a 0 with lt | rfl | gt
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ : ∃ b, -b = a := ⟨-a, a.neg_neg⟩
simp at lt
rw [if_neg (by omega)]
simp only [Int.cast_neg, Rat.inv_neg, neg_den, inv_intCast_den_of_pos lt, Int.natAbs_neg]
exact Int.eq_natAbs_of_nonneg (by omega)
· simp
· rw [if_neg (by omega)]
simp only [inv_intCast_den_of_pos gt]
exact Int.eq_natAbs_of_nonneg (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem inv_natCast_den (a : ℕ) : (a : ℚ)⁻¹.den = if a = 0 then 1 else a := by
| simpa [-inv_intCast_den, ofInt_eq_cast] using inv_intCast_den a
@[simp]
theorem inv_ofNat_den (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(a) : ℚ)⁻¹.den = OfNat.ofNat a :=
inv_natCast_den_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_neZero a)
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 284 | 290 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Star-convex sets
This files defines star-convex sets (aka star domains, star-shaped set, radially convex set).
A set is star-convex at `x` if every segment from `x` to a point in the set is contained in the set.
This is the prototypical example of a contractible set in homotopy theory (by scaling every point
towards `x`), but has wider uses.
Note that this has nothing to do with star rings, `Star` and co.
## Main declarations
* `StarConvex 𝕜 x s`: `s` is star-convex at `x` with scalars `𝕜`.
## Implementation notes
Instead of saying that a set is star-convex, we say a set is star-convex *at a point*. This has the
advantage of allowing us to talk about convexity as being "everywhere star-convexity" and of making
the union of star-convex sets be star-convex.
Incidentally, this choice means we don't need to assume a set is nonempty for it to be star-convex.
Concretely, the empty set is star-convex at every point.
## TODO
Balanced sets are star-convex.
The closure of a star-convex set is star-convex.
Star-convex sets are contractible.
A nonempty open star-convex set in `ℝ^n` is diffeomorphic to the entire space.
-/
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (x : E) (s : Set E)
/-- Star-convexity of sets. `s` is star-convex at `x` if every segment from `x` to a point in `s` is
contained in `s`. -/
def StarConvex (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
[AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E] (x : E) (s : Set E) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃y : E⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s
variable {𝕜 x s} {t : Set E}
theorem starConvex_iff_segment_subset : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro h y hy z ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h hy ha hb hab
· rintro h y hy a b ha hb hab
exact h hy ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
theorem StarConvex.segment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) : [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
starConvex_iff_segment_subset.1 h hy
theorem StarConvex.openSegment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
(openSegment_subset_segment 𝕜 x y).trans (h.segment_subset hy)
/-- Alternative definition of star-convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
theorem starConvex_iff_pointwise_add_subset :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • {x} + b • s ⊆ s := by
refine
⟨?_, fun h y hy a b ha hb hab =>
h ha hb hab (add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set <| mem_singleton _) ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩)⟩
rintro hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, rfl : u = x, rfl⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact hA hv ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_empty (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x ∅ := fun _ hy => hy.elim
theorem starConvex_univ (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x univ := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => trivial
theorem StarConvex.inter (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab => ⟨hs hy.left ha hb hab, ht hy.right ha hb hab⟩
theorem starConvex_sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂₀ S) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab s hs => h s hs (hy s hs) ha hb hab
theorem starConvex_iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ i, s i) :=
sInter_range s ▸ starConvex_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem starConvex_iInter₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i j)) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) :=
starConvex_iInter fun i => starConvex_iInter (h i)
theorem StarConvex.union (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∪ t) := by
rintro y (hy | hy) a b ha hb hab
· exact Or.inl (hs hy ha hb hab)
· exact Or.inr (ht hy ha hb hab)
theorem starConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hs : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hy ⊢
obtain ⟨i, hy⟩ := hy
exact ⟨i, hs i hy ha hb hab⟩
|
theorem starConvex_iUnion₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i j)) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) :=
starConvex_iUnion fun i => starConvex_iUnion (h i)
theorem starConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Star.lean | 129 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
/-!
# Bind operation for multisets
This file defines a few basic operations on `Multiset`, notably the monadic bind.
## Main declarations
* `Multiset.join`: The join, aka union or sum, of multisets.
* `Multiset.bind`: The bind of a multiset-indexed family of multisets.
* `Multiset.product`: Cartesian product of two multisets.
* `Multiset.sigma`: Disjoint sum of multisets in a sigma type.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero MulAction
universe v
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ δ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### Join -/
/-- `join S`, where `S` is a multiset of multisets, is the lift of the list join
operation, that is, the union of all the sets.
join {{1, 2}, {1, 2}, {0, 1}} = {0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2} -/
def join : Multiset (Multiset α) → Multiset α :=
sum
theorem coe_join : ∀ L : List (List α), join (L.map ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) :
Multiset (Multiset α)) = L.flatten
| [] => rfl
| l :: L => by
exact congr_arg (fun s : Multiset α => ↑l + s) (coe_join L)
@[simp]
theorem join_zero : @join α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s S) : @join α (s ::ₘ S) = s + join S :=
sum_cons _ _
@[simp]
theorem join_add (S T) : @join α (S + T) = join S + join T :=
sum_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem singleton_join (a) : join ({a} : Multiset (Multiset α)) = a :=
sum_singleton _
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {a S} : a ∈ @join α S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) <| by
simp +contextual [or_and_right, exists_or]
@[simp]
theorem card_join (S) : card (@join α S) = sum (map card S) :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (S : Multiset (Multiset α)) :
map f (join S) = join (map (map f) S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_join [CommMonoid α] {S : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
prod (join S) = prod (map prod S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem rel_join {r : α → β → Prop} {s t} (h : Rel (Rel r) s t) : Rel r s.join t.join := by
induction h with
| zero => simp
| cons hab hst ih => simpa using hab.add ih
/-! ### Bind -/
section Bind
variable (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) (f g : α → Multiset β)
/-- `s.bind f` is the monad bind operation, defined as `(s.map f).join`. It is the union of `f a` as
`a` ranges over `s`. -/
def bind (s : Multiset α) (f : α → Multiset β) : Multiset β :=
(s.map f).join
@[simp]
theorem coe_bind (l : List α) (f : α → List β) : (@bind α β l fun a => f a) = l.flatMap f := by
rw [List.flatMap, ← coe_join, List.map_map]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_bind : bind 0 f = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_bind : (a ::ₘ s).bind f = f a + s.bind f := by simp [bind]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_bind : bind {a} f = f a := by simp [bind]
@[simp]
theorem add_bind : (s + t).bind f = s.bind f + t.bind f := by simp [bind]
@[simp]
theorem bind_zero : s.bind (fun _ => 0 : α → Multiset β) = 0 := by simp [bind, join, nsmul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem bind_add : (s.bind fun a => f a + g a) = s.bind f + s.bind g := by simp [bind, join]
@[simp]
theorem bind_cons (f : α → β) (g : α → Multiset β) :
(s.bind fun a => f a ::ₘ g a) = map f s + s.bind g :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp +contextual [add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc])
@[simp]
theorem bind_singleton (f : α → β) : (s.bind fun x => ({f x} : Multiset β)) = map f s :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by rw [zero_bind, map_zero]) (by simp [singleton_add])
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b s} {f : α → Multiset β} : b ∈ bind s f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a := by
simp [bind]
@[simp]
theorem card_bind : card (s.bind f) = (s.map (card ∘ f)).sum := by simp [bind]
theorem bind_congr {f g : α → Multiset β} {m : Multiset α} :
(∀ a ∈ m, f a = g a) → bind m f = bind m g := by simp +contextual [bind]
theorem bind_hcongr {β' : Type v} {m : Multiset α} {f : α → Multiset β} {f' : α → Multiset β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀ a ∈ m, HEq (f a) (f' a)) : HEq (bind m f) (bind m f') := by
subst h
simp only [heq_eq_eq] at hf
simp [bind_congr hf]
theorem map_bind (m : Multiset α) (n : α → Multiset β) (f : β → γ) :
map f (bind m n) = bind m fun a => map f (n a) := by simp [bind]
theorem bind_map (m : Multiset α) (n : β → Multiset γ) (f : α → β) :
bind (map f m) n = bind m fun a => n (f a) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp +contextual)
theorem bind_assoc {s : Multiset α} {f : α → Multiset β} {g : β → Multiset γ} :
(s.bind f).bind g = s.bind fun a => (f a).bind g :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp +contextual)
theorem bind_bind (m : Multiset α) (n : Multiset β) {f : α → β → Multiset γ} :
((bind m) fun a => (bind n) fun b => f a b) = (bind n) fun b => (bind m) fun a => f a b :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp +contextual)
theorem bind_map_comm (m : Multiset α) (n : Multiset β) {f : α → β → γ} :
((bind m) fun a => n.map fun b => f a b) = (bind n) fun b => m.map fun a => f a b :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp +contextual)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_bind [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (t : α → Multiset β) :
(s.bind t).prod = (s.map fun a => (t a).prod).prod := by simp [bind]
open scoped Relator in
theorem rel_bind {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop} {s t} {f : α → Multiset γ}
{g : β → Multiset δ} (h : (r ⇒ Rel p) f g) (hst : Rel r s t) :
Rel p (s.bind f) (t.bind g) := by
apply rel_join
rw [rel_map]
exact hst.mono fun a _ b _ hr => h hr
theorem count_sum [DecidableEq α] {m : Multiset β} {f : β → Multiset α} {a : α} :
count a (map f m).sum = sum (m.map fun b => count a <| f b) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp)
theorem count_bind [DecidableEq α] {m : Multiset β} {f : β → Multiset α} {a : α} :
count a (bind m f) = sum (m.map fun b => count a <| f b) :=
count_sum
theorem le_bind {α β : Type*} {f : α → Multiset β} (S : Multiset α) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ S) :
f x ≤ S.bind f := by
classical
refine le_iff_count.2 fun a ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨m', hm'⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem <| mem_map_of_mem (fun b ↦ count a (f b)) hx
rw [count_bind, hm', sum_cons]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem attach_bind_coe (s : Multiset α) (f : α → Multiset β) :
(s.attach.bind fun i => f i) = s.bind f :=
congr_arg join <| attach_map_val' _ _
variable {f s t}
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
@[simp] lemma nodup_bind :
Nodup (bind s f) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, Nodup (f a)) ∧ s.Pairwise (Disjoint on f) := by
have : ∀ a, ∃ l : List β, f a = l := fun a => Quot.induction_on (f a) fun l => ⟨l, rfl⟩
choose f' h' using this
have : f = fun a ↦ ofList (f' a) := funext h'
have hd : Symmetric fun a b ↦ List.Disjoint (f' a) (f' b) := fun a b h ↦ h.symm
exact Quot.induction_on s <| by
unfold Function.onFun
simp [this, List.nodup_flatMap, pairwise_coe_iff_pairwise hd]
@[simp]
lemma dedup_bind_dedup [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Multiset α) (f : α → Multiset β) :
(s.dedup.bind f).dedup = (s.bind f).dedup := by
ext x
-- Porting note: was `simp_rw [count_dedup, mem_bind, mem_dedup]`
simp_rw [count_dedup]
congr 1
simp
variable (op : α → α → α) [hc : Std.Commutative op] [ha : Std.Associative op]
theorem fold_bind {ι : Type*} (s : Multiset ι) (t : ι → Multiset α) (b : ι → α) (b₀ : α) :
(s.bind t).fold op ((s.map b).fold op b₀) =
(s.map fun i => (t i).fold op (b i)).fold op b₀ := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with a ha ih
· rw [zero_bind, map_zero, map_zero, fold_zero]
· rw [cons_bind, map_cons, map_cons, fold_cons_left, fold_cons_left, fold_add, ih]
end Bind
/-! ### Product of two multisets -/
section Product
variable (a : α) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) (t : Multiset β)
/-- The multiplicity of `(a, b)` in `s ×ˢ t` is
the product of the multiplicity of `a` in `s` and `b` in `t`. -/
def product (s : Multiset α) (t : Multiset β) : Multiset (α × β) :=
s.bind fun a => t.map <| Prod.mk a
instance instSProd : SProd (Multiset α) (Multiset β) (Multiset (α × β)) where
sprod := Multiset.product
@[simp]
theorem coe_product (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
(l₁ : Multiset α) ×ˢ (l₂ : Multiset β) = (l₁ ×ˢ l₂) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [product, List.product, ← coe_bind]
simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_product : (0 : Multiset α) ×ˢ t = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_product : (a ::ₘ s) ×ˢ t = map (Prod.mk a) t + s ×ˢ t := by simp [SProd.sprod, product]
@[simp]
theorem product_zero : s ×ˢ (0 : Multiset β) = 0 := by simp [SProd.sprod, product]
@[simp]
theorem product_cons : s ×ˢ (b ::ₘ t) = (s.map fun a => (a, b)) + s ×ˢ t := by
simp [SProd.sprod, product]
@[simp]
theorem product_singleton : ({a} : Multiset α) ×ˢ ({b} : Multiset β) = {(a, b)} := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, product, bind_singleton, map_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem add_product (s t : Multiset α) (u : Multiset β) : (s + t) ×ˢ u = s ×ˢ u + t ×ˢ u := by
simp [SProd.sprod, product]
@[simp]
theorem product_add (s : Multiset α) : ∀ t u : Multiset β, s ×ˢ (t + u) = s ×ˢ t + s ×ˢ u :=
| Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ _ => rfl) fun a s IH t u => by
rw [cons_product, IH]
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Bind.lean | 280 | 284 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
Disjoint π₁.boxes π₂.boxes :=
Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J h₁ h₂ =>
Disjoint.le_bot (h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)) ⟨J.upper_mem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset :
π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔
(∀ J ∈ π₁, ∀ J' ∈ π₂, (J ∩ J' : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty → J ≤ J') ∧ π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := by
constructor
· refine fun H => ⟨fun J hJ J' hJ' Hne => ?_, iUnion_mono H⟩
rcases H hJ with ⟨J'', hJ'', Hle⟩
rcases Hne with ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
rwa [π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ' hJ'' hx' (Hle hx)]
· rintro ⟨H, HU⟩ J hJ
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_iUnion] at HU
rcases HU J.upper ⟨J, hJ, J.upper_mem⟩ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hx⟩
exact ⟨J₂, hJ₂, H _ hJ _ hJ₂ ⟨_, J.upper_mem, hx⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (h₁ : π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes) (h₂ : π₂.iUnion ⊆ π₁.iUnion) :
π₁ = π₂ :=
le_antisymm (fun J hJ => ⟨J, h₁ hJ, le_rfl⟩) <|
le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset.2
⟨fun _ hJ₁ _ hJ₂ Hne =>
(π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ (h₁ hJ₂) Hne.choose_spec.1 Hne.choose_spec.2).le, h₂⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a prepartition `π` of a box `I` and a collection of prepartitions `πi J` of all boxes
`J ∈ π`, returns the prepartition of `I` into the union of the boxes of all `πi J`.
Though we only use the values of `πi` on the boxes of `π`, we require `πi` to be a globally defined
function. -/
@[simps]
def biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_boxes] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩
exact ((πi J').le_of_mem hJ).trans (π.le_of_mem hJ')
pairwiseDisjoint := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro J₁' ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₁'⟩ J₂' ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₂'⟩ Hne
rw [Function.onFun, Set.disjoint_left]
rintro x hx₁ hx₂; apply Hne
obtain rfl : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem hJ₁' hx₁) ((πi J₂).le_of_mem hJ₂' hx₂)
exact (πi J₁).eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁' hJ₂' hx₁ hx₂
variable {πi πi₁ πi₂ : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J}
@[simp]
theorem mem_biUnion : J ∈ π.biUnion πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J' := by simp [biUnion]
theorem biUnion_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) : π.biUnion πi ≤ π := fun _ hJ =>
let ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩ := π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ
⟨J', hJ', (πi J').le_of_mem hJ⟩
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_top : (π.biUnion fun _ => ⊤) = π := by
ext
simp
@[congr]
theorem biUnion_congr (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ∈ π₁, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ := by
subst π₂
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion]
constructor <;> exact fun ⟨J', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨J', h₁, hi J' h₁ ▸ h₂⟩
theorem biUnion_congr_of_le (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ≤ I, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ :=
biUnion_congr h fun J hJ => hi J (π₁.le_of_mem hJ)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).iUnion := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_biUnion_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, f J' := by
refine Finset.sum_biUnion fun J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J' h₁' h₂' => ?_
exact hne (π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem h₁') ((πi J₂).le_of_mem h₂'))
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `J ∈ π.biUnion πi`, returns the box `J' ∈ π` such that `J ∈ πi J'`.
For `J ∉ π.biUnion πi`, returns `I`. -/
def biUnionIndex (πi : ∀ (J : Box ι), Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : Box ι :=
if hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi then (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose else I
theorem biUnionIndex_mem (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ∈ π := by
rw [biUnionIndex, dif_pos hJ]
exact (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.1
theorem biUnionIndex_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ≤ I := by
by_cases hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi
· exact π.le_of_mem (π.biUnionIndex_mem hJ)
· rw [biUnionIndex, dif_neg hJ]
theorem mem_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ∈ πi (π.biUnionIndex πi J) := by
convert (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.2 <;> exact dif_pos hJ
| theorem le_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ≤ π.biUnionIndex πi J :=
le_of_mem _ (π.mem_biUnionIndex hJ)
/-- Uniqueness property of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnionIndex`. -/
theorem biUnionIndex_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : π.biUnionIndex πi J' = J :=
have : J' ∈ π.biUnion πi := π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 332 | 337 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Anne Baanen,
Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Defs
/-!
# Endomorphisms of a module
In this file we define the type of linear endomorphisms of a module over a ring (`Module.End`).
We set up the basic theory,
including the action of `Module.End` on the module we are considering endomorphisms of.
## Main results
* `Module.End.instSemiring` and `Module.End.instRing`: the (semi)ring of endomorphisms formed by
taking the additive structure above with composition as multiplication.
-/
universe u v
/-- Linear endomorphisms of a module, with associated ring structure
`Module.End.semiring` and algebra structure `Module.End.algebra`. -/
abbrev Module.End (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :=
M →ₗ[R] M
variable {R R₂ S M M₁ M₂ M₃ N₁ : Type*}
open Function LinearMap
/-!
## Monoid structure of endomorphisms
-/
namespace Module.End
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup N₁] [Module R M] [Module R N₁]
instance : One (Module.End R M) := ⟨LinearMap.id⟩
instance : Mul (Module.End R M) := ⟨fun f g => LinearMap.comp f g⟩
theorem one_eq_id : (1 : Module.End R M) = .id := rfl
theorem mul_eq_comp (f g : Module.End R M) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply (x : M) : (1 : Module.End R M) x = x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply (f g : Module.End R M) (x : M) : (f * g) x = f (g x) := rfl
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : Module.End R M) = _root_.id := rfl
theorem coe_mul (f g : Module.End R M) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
instance instNontrivial [Nontrivial M] : Nontrivial (Module.End R M) := by
obtain ⟨m, ne⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
exact nontrivial_of_ne 1 0 fun p => ne (LinearMap.congr_fun p m)
instance instMonoid : Monoid (Module.End R M) where
mul_assoc _ _ _ := LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ rfl
mul_one := comp_id
one_mul := id_comp
instance instSemiring : Semiring (Module.End R M) where
__ := AddMonoidWithOne.unary
__ := instMonoid
__ := addCommMonoid
mul_zero := comp_zero
zero_mul := zero_comp
left_distrib := fun _ _ _ ↦ comp_add _ _ _
right_distrib := fun _ _ _ ↦ add_comp _ _ _
natCast := fun n ↦ n • (1 : M →ₗ[R] M)
natCast_zero := zero_smul ℕ (1 : M →ₗ[R] M)
natCast_succ := fun n ↦ AddMonoid.nsmul_succ n (1 : M →ₗ[R] M)
/-- See also `Module.End.natCast_def`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_apply (n : ℕ) (m : M) : (↑n : Module.End R M) m = n • m := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_apply (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (m : M) :
(ofNat(n) : Module.End R M) m = ofNat(n) • m := rfl
instance instRing : Ring (Module.End R N₁) where
intCast z := z • (1 : N₁ →ₗ[R] N₁)
intCast_ofNat := natCast_zsmul _
intCast_negSucc := negSucc_zsmul _
/-- See also `Module.End.intCast_def`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_apply (z : ℤ) (m : N₁) : (z : Module.End R N₁) m = z • m :=
rfl
section
variable [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass R S M]
instance instIsScalarTower :
IsScalarTower S (Module.End R M) (Module.End R M) :=
⟨smul_comp⟩
instance instSMulCommClass [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
SMulCommClass S (Module.End R M) (Module.End R M) :=
⟨fun s _ _ ↦ (comp_smul _ s _).symm⟩
instance instSMulCommClass' [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
SMulCommClass (Module.End R M) S (Module.End R M) :=
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
theorem isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit {f : End R M} (h : IsUnit f) (x : M) :
f (h.unit.inv x) = x :=
show (f * h.unit.inv) x = x by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-28")]
alias _root_.Module.End_isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit := isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit
theorem isUnit_inv_apply_apply_of_isUnit {f : End R M} (h : IsUnit f) (x : M) :
h.unit.inv (f x) = x :=
(by simp : (h.unit.inv * f) x = x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-28")]
alias _root_.Module.End_isUnit_inv_apply_apply_of_isUnit := isUnit_inv_apply_apply_of_isUnit
theorem coe_pow (f : End R M) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n] := hom_coe_pow _ rfl (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) _ _
theorem pow_apply (f : End R M) (n : ℕ) (m : M) : (f ^ n) m = f^[n] m := congr_fun (coe_pow f n) m
theorem pow_map_zero_of_le {f : End R M} {m : M} {k l : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ l)
(hm : (f ^ k) m = 0) : (f ^ l) m = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hk, pow_add, mul_apply, hm, map_zero]
theorem commute_pow_left_of_commute
[Semiring R₂] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂] {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
{f : M →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂} {g : Module.End R M} {g₂ : Module.End R₂ M₂}
(h : g₂.comp f = f.comp g) (k : ℕ) : (g₂ ^ k).comp f = f.comp (g ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [one_eq_id]
| succ k ih => rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.comp_assoc, ih,
← LinearMap.comp_assoc, h, LinearMap.comp_assoc, mul_eq_comp]
@[simp]
theorem id_pow (n : ℕ) : (id : End R M) ^ n = .id :=
one_pow n
variable {f' : End R M}
theorem iterate_succ (n : ℕ) : f' ^ (n + 1) = .comp (f' ^ n) f' := by rw [pow_succ, mul_eq_comp]
theorem iterate_surjective (h : Surjective f') : ∀ n : ℕ, Surjective (f' ^ n)
| 0 => surjective_id
| n + 1 => by
rw [iterate_succ]
exact (iterate_surjective h n).comp h
theorem iterate_injective (h : Injective f') : ∀ n : ℕ, Injective (f' ^ n)
| 0 => injective_id
| n + 1 => by
rw [iterate_succ]
exact (iterate_injective h n).comp h
theorem iterate_bijective (h : Bijective f') : ∀ n : ℕ, Bijective (f' ^ n)
| 0 => bijective_id
| n + 1 => by
rw [iterate_succ]
exact (iterate_bijective h n).comp h
theorem injective_of_iterate_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : Injective (f' ^ n)) :
Injective f' := by
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (show 0 < n by omega), iterate_succ, coe_comp] at h
exact h.of_comp
theorem surjective_of_iterate_surjective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : Surjective (f' ^ n)) :
Surjective f' := by
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn), pow_succ', coe_mul] at h
exact Surjective.of_comp h
end
/-! ## Action by a module endomorphism. -/
/-- The tautological action by `Module.End R M` (aka `M →ₗ[R] M`) on `M`.
This generalizes `Function.End.applyMulAction`. -/
instance applyModule : Module (Module.End R M) M where
smul := (· <| ·)
smul_zero := LinearMap.map_zero
smul_add := LinearMap.map_add
add_smul := LinearMap.add_apply
zero_smul := (LinearMap.zero_apply : ∀ m, (0 : M →ₗ[R] M) m = 0)
one_smul _ := rfl
mul_smul _ _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem smul_def (f : Module.End R M) (a : M) : f • a = f a :=
rfl
/-- `LinearMap.applyModule` is faithful. -/
instance apply_faithfulSMul : FaithfulSMul (Module.End R M) M :=
⟨LinearMap.ext⟩
instance apply_smulCommClass [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
SMulCommClass S (Module.End R M) M where
smul_comm r e m := (e.map_smul_of_tower r m).symm
instance apply_smulCommClass' [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
SMulCommClass (Module.End R M) S M :=
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
instance apply_isScalarTower [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass R S M] :
IsScalarTower S (Module.End R M) M :=
⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
end Module.End
/-! ## Actions as module endomorphisms -/
namespace DistribMulAction
variable (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass S R M]
/-- Each element of the monoid defines a linear map.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def toLinearMap (s : S) : M →ₗ[R] M where
toFun := HSMul.hSMul s
map_add' := smul_add s
map_smul' _ _ := smul_comm _ _ _
/-- Each element of the monoid defines a module endomorphism.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidEnd`. -/
@[simps]
def toModuleEnd : S →* Module.End R M where
toFun := toLinearMap R M
map_one' := LinearMap.ext <| one_smul _
map_mul' _ _ := LinearMap.ext <| mul_smul _ _
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [Semiring S] [Module S M] [SMulCommClass S R M]
/-- Each element of the semiring defines a module endomorphism.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toModuleEnd`. -/
@[simps]
def Module.toModuleEnd : S →+* Module.End R M :=
{ DistribMulAction.toModuleEnd R M with
toFun := DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M
map_zero' := LinearMap.ext <| zero_smul S
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ LinearMap.ext <| add_smul _ _ }
/-- The canonical (semi)ring isomorphism from `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to `Module.End R R` induced by the right
multiplication. -/
@[simps]
def RingEquiv.moduleEndSelf : Rᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* Module.End R R :=
{ Module.toModuleEnd R R with
toFun := DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R R
invFun := fun f ↦ MulOpposite.op (f 1)
left_inv := mul_one
right_inv := fun _ ↦ LinearMap.ext_ring <| one_mul _ }
/-- The canonical (semi)ring isomorphism from `R` to `Module.End Rᵐᵒᵖ R` induced by the left
multiplication. -/
@[simps]
def RingEquiv.moduleEndSelfOp : R ≃+* Module.End Rᵐᵒᵖ R :=
{ Module.toModuleEnd _ _ with
toFun := DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _
invFun := fun f ↦ f 1
left_inv := mul_one
right_inv := fun _ ↦ LinearMap.ext_ring_op <| mul_one _ }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-13")] alias Module.moduleEndSelf := RingEquiv.moduleEndSelf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-13")] alias Module.moduleEndSelfOp := RingEquiv.moduleEndSelfOp
theorem Module.End.natCast_def (n : ℕ) [AddCommMonoid N₁] [Module R N₁] :
(↑n : Module.End R N₁) = Module.toModuleEnd R N₁ n :=
rfl
theorem Module.End.intCast_def (z : ℤ) [AddCommGroup N₁] [Module R N₁] :
(z : Module.End R N₁) = Module.toModuleEnd R N₁ z :=
rfl
end Module
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
section SMulRight
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M] [Module R M₁]
variable [Semiring S] [Module R S] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- When `f` is an `R`-linear map taking values in `S`, then `fun b ↦ f b • x` is an `R`-linear
map. -/
def smulRight (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] S) (x : M) : M₁ →ₗ[R] M where
toFun b := f b • x
map_add' x y := by rw [f.map_add, add_smul]
map_smul' b y := by rw [RingHom.id_apply, map_smul, smul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem coe_smulRight (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] S) (x : M) : (smulRight f x : M₁ → M) = fun c => f c • x :=
rfl
theorem smulRight_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] S) (x : M) (c : M₁) : smulRight f x c = f c • x :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma smulRight_zero (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] S) : f.smulRight (0 : M) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma zero_smulRight (x : M) : (0 : M₁ →ₗ[R] S).smulRight x = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma smulRight_apply_eq_zero_iff {f : M₁ →ₗ[R] S} {x : M} [NoZeroSMulDivisors S M] :
f.smulRight x = 0 ↔ f = 0 ∨ x = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
refine ⟨fun h ↦ Or.inl ?_, fun h ↦ by simp [h.resolve_right hx]⟩
ext v
replace h : f v • x = 0 := by simpa only [LinearMap.zero_apply] using LinearMap.congr_fun h v
rw [smul_eq_zero] at h
tauto
end SMulRight
end AddCommMonoid
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₂]
variable (S)
/-- Applying a linear map at `v : M`, seen as `S`-linear map from `M →ₗ[R] M₂` to `M₂`.
See `LinearMap.applyₗ` for a version where `S = R`. -/
@[simps]
def applyₗ' : M →+ (M →ₗ[R] M₂) →ₗ[S] M₂ where
toFun v :=
{ toFun := fun f => f v
map_add' := fun f g => f.add_apply g v
map_smul' := fun x f => f.smul_apply x v }
map_zero' := LinearMap.ext fun f => f.map_zero
map_add' _ _ := LinearMap.ext fun f => f.map_add _ _
end Module
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
/-- Composition by `f : M₂ → M₃` is a linear map from the space of linear maps `M → M₂`
to the space of linear maps `M → M₃`. -/
def compRight (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (M →ₗ[R] M₂) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M₃ where
toFun g := f.comp g
| map_add' _ _ := LinearMap.ext fun _ => map_add f _ _
map_smul' _ _ := LinearMap.ext fun _ => map_smul f _ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/LinearMap/End.lean | 371 | 372 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.Monoid
/-!
# Lie groups
A Lie group is a group that is also a `C^n` manifold, in which the group operations of
multiplication and inversion are `C^n` maps. Regularity of the group multiplication means that
multiplication is a `C^n` mapping of the product manifold `G` × `G` into `G`.
Note that, since a manifold here is not second-countable and Hausdorff a Lie group here is not
guaranteed to be second-countable (even though it can be proved it is Hausdorff). Note also that Lie
groups here are not necessarily finite dimensional.
## Main definitions
* `LieAddGroup I G` : a Lie additive group where `G` is a manifold on the model with corners `I`.
* `LieGroup I G` : a Lie multiplicative group where `G` is a manifold on the model with corners `I`.
* `ContMDiffInv₀`: typeclass for `C^n` manifolds with `0` and `Inv` such that inversion is `C^n`
map at each non-zero point. This includes complete normed fields and (multiplicative) Lie groups.
## Main results
* `ContMDiff.inv`, `ContMDiff.div` and variants: point-wise inversion and division of maps `M → G`
is `C^n`.
* `ContMDiff.inv₀` and variants: if `ContMDiffInv₀ I n N`, point-wise inversion of `C^n`
maps `f : M → N` is `C^n` at all points at which `f` doesn't vanish.
* `ContMDiff.div₀` and variants: if also `ContMDiffMul I n N` (i.e., `N` is a Lie group except
possibly for smoothness of inversion at `0`), similar results hold for point-wise division.
* `instNormedSpaceLieAddGroup` : a normed vector space over a nontrivially normed field
is an additive Lie group.
* `Instances/UnitsOfNormedAlgebra` shows that the group of units of a complete normed `𝕜`-algebra
is a multiplicative Lie group.
## Implementation notes
A priori, a Lie group here is a manifold with corners.
The definition of Lie group cannot require `I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E` with the same space as the
model space and as the model vector space, as one might hope, because in the product situation,
the model space is `ModelProd E E'` and the model vector space is `E × E'`, which are not the same,
so the definition does not apply. Hence the definition should be more general, allowing
`I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold ContDiff
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
/-- An additive Lie group is a group and a `C^n` manifold at the same time in which
the addition and negation operations are `C^n`. -/
class LieAddGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(n : WithTop ℕ∞) (G : Type*)
[AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] : Prop extends ContMDiffAdd I n G where
/-- Negation is smooth in an additive Lie group. -/
contMDiff_neg : ContMDiff I I n fun a : G => -a
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
/-- A (multiplicative) Lie group is a group and a `C^n` manifold at the same time in which
the multiplication and inverse operations are `C^n`. -/
@[to_additive]
class LieGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(n : WithTop ℕ∞) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] : Prop extends ContMDiffMul I n G where
/-- Inversion is smooth in a Lie group. -/
contMDiff_inv : ContMDiff I I n fun a : G => a⁻¹
/-!
### Smoothness of inversion, negation, division and subtraction
Let `f : M → G` be a `C^n` function into a Lie group, then `f` is point-wise
invertible with smooth inverse `f`. If `f` and `g` are two such functions, the quotient
`f / g` (i.e., the point-wise product of `f` and the point-wise inverse of `g`) is also `C^n`. -/
section PointwiseDivision
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Group G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem LieGroup.of_le {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} (hmn : m ≤ n)
[h : LieGroup I n G] : LieGroup I m G := by
have : ContMDiffMul I m G := ContMDiffMul.of_le hmn
exact ⟨h.contMDiff_inv.of_le hmn⟩
@[to_additive]
instance {a : WithTop ℕ∞} [LieGroup I ∞ G] [h : ENat.LEInfty a] : LieGroup I a G :=
LieGroup.of_le h.out
@[to_additive]
instance {a : WithTop ℕ∞} [LieGroup I ω G] : LieGroup I a G :=
LieGroup.of_le le_top
@[to_additive]
instance [IsTopologicalGroup G] : LieGroup I 0 G := by
constructor
rw [contMDiff_zero_iff]
exact continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
instance [LieGroup I 2 G] : LieGroup I 1 G :=
LieGroup.of_le one_le_two
variable [LieGroup I n G]
section
variable (I n)
/-- In a Lie group, inversion is `C^n`. -/
@[to_additive "In an additive Lie group, inversion is a smooth map."]
theorem contMDiff_inv : ContMDiff I I n fun x : G => x⁻¹ :=
LieGroup.contMDiff_inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_inv := contMDiff_inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smooth_neg := contMDiff_neg
include I n in
/-- A Lie group is a topological group. This is not an instance for technical reasons,
see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]. -/
@[to_additive "An additive Lie group is an additive topological group. This is not an instance for
technical reasons, see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]."]
theorem topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
{ continuousMul_of_contMDiffMul I n with continuous_inv := (contMDiff_inv I n).continuous }
end
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
(contMDiff_inv I n).contMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt.comp x₀ hf <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀) :
ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
(contMDiff_inv I n).contMDiffAt.comp x₀ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) :
ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inv
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiff.inv {f : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) : ContMDiff I' I n fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
fun x => (hf x).inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt.inv := ContMDiffWithinAt.inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothAt.inv := ContMDiffAt.inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn.inv := ContMDiffOn.inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias Smooth.inv := ContMDiff.inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt.neg := ContMDiffWithinAt.neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothAt.neg := ContMDiffAt.neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn.neg := ContMDiffOn.neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias Smooth.neg := ContMDiff.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) (hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n g s x₀) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.div {f g : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀)
(hg : ContMDiffAt I' I n g x₀) : ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s)
(hg : ContMDiffOn I' I n g s) : ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiff.div {f g : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) (hg : ContMDiff I' I n g) :
ContMDiff I' I n fun x => f x / g x := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt.div := ContMDiffWithinAt.div
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothAt.div := ContMDiffAt.div
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn.div := ContMDiffOn.div
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias Smooth.div := ContMDiff.div
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt.sub := ContMDiffWithinAt.sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothAt.sub := ContMDiffAt.sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn.sub := ContMDiffOn.sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias Smooth.sub := ContMDiff.sub
end PointwiseDivision
/-! Binary product of Lie groups -/
section Product
-- Instance of product group
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.instLieGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Group G] [LieGroup I n G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] [ChartedSpace H' G']
[Group G'] [LieGroup I' n G'] : LieGroup (I.prod I') n (G × G') :=
{ ContMDiffMul.prod _ _ _ _ with contMDiff_inv := contMDiff_fst.inv.prodMk contMDiff_snd.inv }
end Product
/-! ### Normed spaces are Lie groups -/
instance instNormedSpaceLieAddGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : LieAddGroup 𝓘(𝕜, E) n E where
contMDiff_neg := contDiff_neg.contMDiff
/-! ## `C^n` manifolds with `C^n` inversion away from zero
Typeclass for `C^n` manifolds with `0` and `Inv` such that inversion is `C^n` at all non-zero
points. (This includes multiplicative Lie groups, but also complete normed semifields.)
Point-wise inversion is `C^n` when the function/denominator is non-zero. -/
section ContMDiffInv₀
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
/-- A `C^n` manifold with `0` and `Inv` such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is `C^n` at all nonzero points.
Any complete normed (semi)field has this property. -/
class ContMDiffInv₀ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(n : WithTop ℕ∞) (G : Type*)
[Inv G] [Zero G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] : Prop where
/-- Inversion is `C^n` away from `0`. -/
contMDiffAt_inv₀ : ∀ ⦃x : G⦄, x ≠ 0 → ContMDiffAt I I n (fun y ↦ y⁻¹) x
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")] alias SmoothInv₀ := ContMDiffInv₀
instance {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContMDiffInv₀ 𝓘(𝕜) n 𝕜 where
contMDiffAt_inv₀ x hx := by
change ContMDiffAt 𝓘(𝕜) 𝓘(𝕜) n Inv.inv x
rw [contMDiffAt_iff_contDiffAt]
exact contDiffAt_inv 𝕜 hx
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Inv G] [Zero G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{f : M → G}
protected theorem ContMDiffInv₀.of_le {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} (hmn : m ≤ n)
[h : ContMDiffInv₀ I n G] : ContMDiffInv₀ I m G := by
exact ⟨fun x hx ↦ (h.contMDiffAt_inv₀ hx).of_le hmn⟩
instance {a : WithTop ℕ∞} [ContMDiffInv₀ I ∞ G] [h : ENat.LEInfty a] : ContMDiffInv₀ I a G :=
ContMDiffInv₀.of_le h.out
instance {a : WithTop ℕ∞} [ContMDiffInv₀ I ω G] : ContMDiffInv₀ I a G :=
ContMDiffInv₀.of_le le_top
instance [HasContinuousInv₀ G] : ContMDiffInv₀ I 0 G := by
have : T1Space G := I.t1Space G
constructor
have A : ContMDiffOn I I 0 (fun (x : G) ↦ x⁻¹) {0}ᶜ := by
rw [contMDiffOn_zero_iff]
exact continuousOn_inv₀
intro x hx
have : ContMDiffWithinAt I I 0 (fun (x : G) ↦ x⁻¹) {0}ᶜ x := A x hx
apply ContMDiffWithinAt.contMDiffAt this
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_compl_singleton hx
instance [ContMDiffInv₀ I 2 G] : ContMDiffInv₀ I 1 G :=
ContMDiffInv₀.of_le one_le_two
variable [ContMDiffInv₀ I n G]
theorem contMDiffAt_inv₀ {x : G} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ContMDiffAt I I n (fun y ↦ y⁻¹) x :=
ContMDiffInv₀.contMDiffAt_inv₀ hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smoothAt_inv₀ := contMDiffAt_inv₀
include I n in
/-- In a manifold with `C^n` inverse away from `0`, the inverse is continuous away from `0`.
This is not an instance for technical reasons, see
note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]. -/
theorem hasContinuousInv₀_of_hasContMDiffInv₀ : HasContinuousInv₀ G :=
{ continuousAt_inv₀ := fun _ hx ↦ (contMDiffAt_inv₀ (I := I) (n := n) hx).continuousAt }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")]
alias hasContinuousInv₀_of_hasSmoothInv₀ := hasContinuousInv₀_of_hasContMDiffInv₀
theorem contMDiffOn_inv₀ : ContMDiffOn I I n (Inv.inv : G → G) {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(contMDiffAt_inv₀ hx).contMDiffWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias smoothOn_inv₀ := contMDiffOn_inv₀
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn_inv₀ := contMDiffOn_inv₀
variable {s : Set M} {a : M}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s a :=
(contMDiffAt_inv₀ ha).comp_contMDiffWithinAt a hf
theorem ContMDiffAt.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) a :=
(contMDiffAt_inv₀ ha).comp a hf
theorem ContMDiff.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
ContMDiff I' I n (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) :=
fun x ↦ ContMDiffAt.inv₀ (hf x) (h0 x)
theorem ContMDiffOn.inv₀ (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s :=
fun x hx ↦ ContMDiffWithinAt.inv₀ (hf x hx) (h0 x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt.inv₀ := ContMDiffWithinAt.inv₀
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothAt.inv₀ := ContMDiffAt.inv₀
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn.inv₀ := ContMDiffOn.inv₀
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias Smooth.inv₀ := ContMDiff.inv₀
end ContMDiffInv₀
/-! ### Point-wise division of `C^n` functions
If `[ContMDiffMul I n N]` and `[ContMDiffInv₀ I n N]`, point-wise division of `C^n`
functions `f : M → N` is `C^n` whenever the denominator is non-zero.
(This includes `N` being a completely normed field.)
-/
section Div
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [GroupWithZero G] [ContMDiffInv₀ I n G]
[ContMDiffMul I n G]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {a : M}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.div₀
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s a) (hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n g s a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (f / g) s a := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
theorem ContMDiffOn.div₀ (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) (hg : ContMDiffOn I' I n g s)
(h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) : ContMDiffOn I' I n (f / g) s := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
theorem ContMDiffAt.div₀ (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f a) (hg : ContMDiffAt I' I n g a)
(h₀ : g a ≠ 0) : ContMDiffAt I' I n (f / g) a := by
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
theorem ContMDiff.div₀ (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) (hg : ContMDiff I' I n g) (h₀ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0) :
| ContMDiff I' I n (f / g) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Algebra/LieGroup.lean | 355 | 356 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Basic facts about biproducts in preadditive categories.
In (or between) preadditive categories,
* Any biproduct satisfies the equality
`total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`,
or, in the binary case, `total : fst ≫ inl + snd ≫ inr = 𝟙 X`.
* Any (binary) `product` or (binary) `coproduct` is a (binary) `biproduct`.
* In any category (with zero morphisms), if `biprod.map f g` is an isomorphism,
then both `f` and `g` are isomorphisms.
* If `f` is a morphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
then we can construct isomorphisms `L : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂` and `R : Y₁ ⊞ Y₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂`
so that `L.hom ≫ g ≫ R.hom` is diagonal (with `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` component still `f`),
via Gaussian elimination.
* As a corollary of the previous two facts,
if we have an isomorphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
we can construct an isomorphism `X₂ ≅ Y₂`.
* If `f : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z` is an isomorphism, either `𝟙 W = 0`,
or at least one of the component maps `W ⟶ Y` and `W ⟶ Z` is nonzero.
* If `f : ⨁ S ⟶ ⨁ T` is an isomorphism,
then every column (corresponding to a nonzero summand in the domain)
has some nonzero matrix entry.
* A functor preserves a biproduct if and only if it preserves
the corresponding product if and only if it preserves the corresponding coproduct.
There are connections between this material and the special case of the category whose morphisms are
matrices over a ring, in particular the Schur complement (see
`Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SchurComplement`). In particular, the declarations
`CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`, `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian`
and `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` are all closely related.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
namespace Limits
section Fintype
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBilimitOfTotal {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) :
b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s => ∑ j : J, s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ b.ι j
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
have reassoced : m ≫ Bicone.π b j ≫ Bicone.ι b j = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ Bicone.ι b j := by
erw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
rw [reassoced]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [sum_comp, Category.assoc, Bicone.toCone_π_app, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
dsimp
simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s => ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ s.ι.app ⟨j⟩
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, sum_comp]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
erw [Category.assoc, h ⟨j⟩]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, b.ι_π, dite_comp]
dsimp; simp }
theorem IsBilimit.total {f : J → C} {b : Bicone f} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBiproduct_of_total {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f)
(total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBiproduct f :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsLimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, t.ι_π, dite_comp, comp_dite]
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsLimit t) : (Bicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsLimit _ <| IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ht <| Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsColimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp_rw [Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, t.ι_π, dite_comp]
simp
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (Bicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsColimit _ <| IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <| Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro ⟨j⟩; simp
end Fintype
section Finite
variable {J : Type} [Finite J]
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasCoproduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
end Finite
/-- A preadditive category with finite products has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteProducts [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct _ }⟩
/-- A preadditive category with finite coproducts has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteCoproducts [HasFiniteCoproducts C] :
HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct _ }⟩
section HasBiproduct
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f]
/-- In any preadditive category, any biproduct satisfies
`∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
-/
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f) :=
IsBilimit.total (biproduct.isBilimit _)
theorem biproduct.lift_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} :
biproduct.lift g = ∑ j, g j ≫ biproduct.ι f j := by
classical
ext j
simp only [sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, biproduct.lift_π, Category.assoc, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, if_true]
theorem biproduct.desc_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, f j ⟶ T} :
biproduct.desc g = ∑ j, biproduct.π f j ≫ g j := by
classical
ext j
simp [comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_desc {T U : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ U} :
biproduct.lift g ≫ biproduct.desc h = ∑ j : J, g j ≫ h j := by
classical
simp [biproduct.lift_eq, biproduct.desc_eq, comp_sum, sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite,
dite_comp]
theorem biproduct.map_eq [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f g : J → C} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j} :
biproduct.map h = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ h j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
classical
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_sum, sum_comp, comp_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_matrix {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
{P} (x : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) :
biproduct.lift x ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => ∑ j, x j ≫ m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.lift_desc]
end HasBiproduct
section HasFiniteBiproducts
variable {J K : Type} [Finite J] {f : J → C} [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_desc [Fintype K] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
(m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) {P} (x : ∀ k, g k ⟶ P) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.desc x = biproduct.desc fun j => ∑ k, m j k ≫ x k := by
| ext
simp [lift_desc]
variable [Finite K]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Biproducts.lean | 251 | 255 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# The primitive recursive functions
The primitive recursive functions are the least collection of functions
`ℕ → ℕ` which are closed under projections (using the `pair`
pairing function), composition, zero, successor, and primitive recursion
(i.e. `Nat.rec` where the motive is `C n := ℕ`).
We can extend this definition to a large class of basic types by
using canonical encodings of types as natural numbers (Gödel numbering),
which we implement through the type class `Encodable`. (More precisely,
we need that the composition of encode with decode yields a
primitive recursive function, so we have the `Primcodable` type class
for this.)
In the above, the pairing function is primitive recursive by definition.
This deviates from the textbook definition of primitive recursive functions,
which instead work with *`n`-ary* functions. We formalize the textbook
definition in `Nat.Primrec'`. `Nat.Primrec'.prim_iff` then proves it is
equivalent to our chosen formulation. For more discussionn of this and
other design choices in this formalization, see [carneiro2019].
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions `f : ℕ → ℕ`
- `Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Primcodable α`: well-behaved encoding of `α` into `ℕ`, i.e. one such that roundtripping through
the encoding functions adds no computational power
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Denumerable Encodable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Calls the given function on a pair of entries `n`, encoded via the pairing function. -/
@[simp, reducible]
def unpaired {α} (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : α :=
f n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
/-- The primitive recursive functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
protected inductive Primrec : (ℕ → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Nat.Primrec fun _ => 0
| protected succ : Nat.Primrec succ
| left : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.1
| right : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => pair (f n) (g n)
| comp {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => f (g n)
| prec {f g} :
Nat.Primrec f →
Nat.Primrec g →
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.rec (f z) fun y IH => g <| pair z <| pair y IH)
namespace Primrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Nat.Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const : ∀ n : ℕ, Nat.Primrec fun _ => n
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => Primrec.succ.comp (const n)
protected theorem id : Nat.Primrec id :=
(left.pair right).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem prec1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) :
Nat.Primrec fun n => n.rec m fun y IH => f <| Nat.pair y IH :=
((prec (const m) (hf.comp right)).comp (zero.pair Primrec.id)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem casesOn1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Nat.Primrec (Nat.casesOn · m f) :=
(prec1 m (hf.comp left)).of_eq <| by simp
-- Porting note: `Nat.Primrec.casesOn` is already declared as a recursor.
theorem casesOn' {f g} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (hg : Nat.Primrec g) :
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.casesOn (f z) fun y => g <| Nat.pair z y) :=
(prec hf (hg.comp (pair left (left.comp right)))).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem swap : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap Nat.pair)) :=
(pair right left).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem swap' {f} (hf : Nat.Primrec (unpaired f)) : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap f)) :=
(hf.comp .swap).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem pred : Nat.Primrec pred :=
(casesOn1 0 Primrec.id).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp [*]
theorem add : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· + ·)) :=
(prec .id ((Primrec.succ.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem sub : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· - ·)) :=
(prec .id ((pred.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
theorem mul : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· * ·)) :=
(prec zero (add.comp (pair left (right.comp right)))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, mul_succ, add_comm _ (unpair p).fst]
theorem pow : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· ^ ·)) :=
(prec (const 1) (mul.comp (pair (right.comp right) left))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.pow_succ]
end Primrec
end Nat
/-- A `Primcodable` type is, essentially, an `Encodable` type for which
the encode/decode functions are primitive recursive.
However, such a definition is circular.
Instead, we ask that the composition of `decode : ℕ → Option α` with
`encode : Option α → ℕ` is primitive recursive. Said composition is
the identity function, restricted to the image of `encode`.
Thus, in a way, the added requirement ensures that no predicates
can be smuggled in through a cunning choice of the subset of `ℕ` into
which the type is encoded. -/
class Primcodable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
-- Porting note: was `prim [] `.
-- This means that `prim` does not take the type explicitly in Lean 4
prim : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (decode n)
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance (priority := 10) ofDenumerable (α) [Denumerable α] : Primcodable α :=
⟨Nat.Primrec.succ.of_eq <| by simp⟩
/-- Builds a `Primcodable` instance from an equivalence to a `Primcodable` type. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Primcodable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Primcodable β :=
{ __ := Encodable.ofEquiv α e
prim := (@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by
rw [decode_ofEquiv]
cases (@decode α _ n) <;>
simp [encode_ofEquiv] }
instance empty : Primcodable Empty :=
⟨zero⟩
instance unit : Primcodable PUnit :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 zero).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp⟩
instance option {α : Type*} [h : Primcodable α] : Primcodable (Option α) :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 ((casesOn1 0 (.comp .succ .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _))).of_eq fun n => by
cases n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n =>
rw [decode_option_succ]
cases H : @decode α _ n <;> simp [H]⟩
instance bool : Primcodable Bool :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 (casesOn1 2 zero)).of_eq fun n => match n with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| (n + 2) => by rw [decode_ge_two] <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
/-- `Primrec f` means `f` is primitive recursive (after
encoding its input and output as natural numbers). -/
def Primrec {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Nat.Primrec fun n => encode ((@decode α _ n).map f)
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
protected theorem encode : Primrec (@encode α _) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem decode : Primrec (@decode α _) :=
Nat.Primrec.succ.comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)
theorem dom_denumerable {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec fun n => encode (f (ofNat α n)) :=
⟨fun h => (pred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp, fun h =>
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp⟩
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} : Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec f :=
dom_denumerable
theorem encdec : Primrec fun n => encode (@decode α _ n) :=
nat_iff.2 Primcodable.prim
theorem option_some : Primrec (@some α) :=
((casesOn1 0 (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec fun _ : α => x :=
((casesOn1 0 (.const (encode x).succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem id : Primrec (@id α) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α).of_eq <| by simp
theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) :=
((casesOn1 0 (.comp hf (pred.comp hg))).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem succ : Primrec Nat.succ :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.succ
theorem pred : Primrec Nat.pred :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.pred
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl, Primrec.encode.comp⟩
theorem ofNat_iff {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Primrec fun n => f (ofNat α n) :=
dom_denumerable.trans <| nat_iff.symm.trans encode_iff
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Primrec (ofNat α) :=
ofNat_iff.1 Primrec.id
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => some (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| pred.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e :=
letI : Primcodable β := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 Primrec.encode
theorem of_equiv_symm {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e.symm :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 (show Primrec fun a => encode (e (e.symm a)) by simp [Primrec.encode])
theorem of_equiv_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → β} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv_symm.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv_symm_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e.symm (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv_symm.comp⟩
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance prod {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primcodable (α × β) :=
⟨((casesOn' zero ((casesOn' zero .succ).comp (pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1; · simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem fst {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.fst α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp left)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem snd {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.snd α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp right)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem pair {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => (f a, g a) :=
((casesOn1 0
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp <|
.pair (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf) (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hg))).comp
(@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq
fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem unpair : Primrec Nat.unpair :=
(pair (nat_iff.2 .left) (nat_iff.2 .right)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem list_getElem?₁ : ∀ l : List α, Primrec (l[·]? : ℕ → Option α)
| [] => dom_denumerable.2 zero
| a :: l =>
dom_denumerable.2 <|
(casesOn1 (encode a).succ <| dom_denumerable.1 <| list_getElem?₁ l).of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get?₁ := list_getElem?₁
end Primrec
/-- `Primrec₂ f` means `f` is a binary primitive recursive function.
This is technically unnecessary since we can always curry all
the arguments together, but there are enough natural two-arg
functions that it is convenient to express this directly. -/
def Primrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- `PrimrecPred p` means `p : α → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive predicate, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecPred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :=
Primrec fun a => decide (p a)
/-- `PrimrecRel p` means `p : α → β → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive relation, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → β → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecRel {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (s : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] :=
Primrec₂ fun a b => decide (s a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Primrec₂ f := hf
theorem of_eq {f g : α → β → σ} (hg : Primrec₂ f) (H : ∀ a b, f a b = g a b) : Primrec₂ g :=
(by funext a b; apply H : f = g) ▸ hg
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (_ : β) => x :=
Primrec.const _
protected theorem pair : Primrec₂ (@Prod.mk α β) :=
Primrec.pair .fst .snd
theorem left : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (_ : β) => a :=
.fst
theorem right : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (b : β) => b :=
.snd
theorem natPair : Primrec₂ Nat.pair := by simp [Primrec₂, Primrec]; constructor
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ → α} : Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.comp natPair, fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ} : Nat.Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
theorem encode_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => encode (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.encode_iff
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => some (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.option_some_iff
theorem ofNat_iff {α β σ} [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔ Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => f (ofNat α m) (ofNat β n) :=
(Primrec.ofNat_iff.trans <| by simp).trans unpaired
theorem uncurry {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec (Function.uncurry f) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
rw [show Function.uncurry f = fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 from funext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => rfl]; rfl
theorem curry {f : α × β → σ} : Primrec₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ Primrec f := by
rw [← uncurry, Function.uncurry_curry]
end Primrec₂
section Comp
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem Primrec.comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem Primrec₂.comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec h) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
Primrec.comp hf (hg.pair hh)
theorem Primrec₂.comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Primrec₂ f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
theorem PrimrecPred.comp {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α → β} :
PrimrecPred p → Primrec f → PrimrecPred fun a => p (f a) :=
Primrec.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp {R : β → γ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec f → Primrec g → PrimrecPred fun a => R (f a) (g a) :=
Primrec₂.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp₂ {R : γ → δ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β → γ}
{g : α → β → δ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec₂ f → Primrec₂ g → PrimrecRel fun a b => R (f a b) (g a b) :=
PrimrecRel.comp
end Comp
theorem PrimrecPred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) : PrimrecPred q :=
Primrec.of_eq hp fun a => Bool.decide_congr (H a)
theorem PrimrecRel.of_eq {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {r s : α → β → Prop}
[∀ a b, Decidable (r a b)] [∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] (hr : PrimrecRel r)
(H : ∀ a b, r a b ↔ s a b) : PrimrecRel s :=
Primrec₂.of_eq hr fun a b => Bool.decide_congr (H a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem swap {f : α → β → σ} (h : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec₂ (swap f) :=
h.comp₂ Primrec₂.right Primrec₂.left
theorem nat_iff {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec₂ f ↔ Nat.Primrec
(.unpaired fun m n => encode <| (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) := by
have :
∀ (a : Option α) (b : Option β),
Option.map (fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2)
(Option.bind a fun a : α => Option.map (Prod.mk a) b) =
Option.bind a fun a => Option.map (f a) b := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
simp [Primrec₂, Primrec, this]
theorem nat_iff' {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔
Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => Option.map (f a) (@decode β _ n) :=
nat_iff.trans <| unpaired'.trans encode_iff
end Primrec₂
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun _ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ × β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => n.rec (motive := fun _ => β) (f a) fun n IH => g a (n, IH) :=
Primrec₂.nat_iff.2 <|
((Nat.Primrec.casesOn' .zero <|
(Nat.Primrec.prec hf <|
.comp hg <|
Nat.Primrec.left.pair <|
(Nat.Primrec.left.comp .right).pair <|
Nat.Primrec.pred.comp <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp .right).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.right.pair <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp Nat.Primrec.left).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.id.pair <| (@Primcodable.prim α).comp Nat.Primrec.left).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, id_eq, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val, decode_nat,
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map, Option.map_some']
rcases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with - | a; · rfl
simp only [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one, encode_some, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, encodek, Option.map_some',
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map]
induction' n.unpair.2 with m <;> simp [encodek]
simp [*, encodek]
theorem nat_rec' {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ × β → β}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).rec (motive := fun _ => β) (g a) fun n IH => h a (n, IH) :=
(nat_rec hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_rec₁ {f : ℕ → α → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec (Nat.rec a f) :=
nat_rec' .id (const a) <| comp₂ hf Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn (f a) (g a) : β) :=
nat_rec hf <| hg.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| comp₂ fst Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => ((f a).casesOn (g a) (h a) : β) :=
(nat_casesOn' hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_casesOn₁ {f : ℕ → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec f) :
Primrec (fun (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn a f : α)) :=
nat_casesOn .id (const a) (comp₂ hf .right)
theorem nat_iterate {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => (h a)^[f a] (g a) :=
(nat_rec' hf hg (hh.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq fun a => by
induction f a <;> simp [*, -Function.iterate_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Primrec o)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
encode_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (encode_iff.2 hf) <|
pred.comp₂ <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.2 <|
(Primrec₂.nat_iff'.1 hg).comp₂ ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp fst).to₂
Primrec₂.right).of_eq
fun a => by rcases o a with - | b <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_bind₁ {f : α → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun o => Option.bind o f :=
option_bind .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)).of_eq fun x => by cases f x <;> rfl
theorem option_map₁ {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec (Option.map f) :=
option_map .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_iget [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@Option.iget α _) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const <| @default α _) .right).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_isSome : Primrec (@Option.isSome α) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const false) (const true).to₂).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_getD : Primrec₂ (@Option.getD α) :=
Primrec.of_eq (option_casesOn Primrec₂.left Primrec₂.right .right) fun ⟨o, a⟩ => by
cases o <;> rfl
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).bind (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [encodek] using h.comp fst ((@Primrec.encode β _).comp snd), fun h =>
option_bind (Primrec.decode.comp snd) <| h.comp (fst.comp fst) snd⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
simp only [Option.map_eq_bind]
exact bind_decode_iff.trans Primrec₂.option_some_iff
theorem nat_add : Primrec₂ ((· + ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.add
theorem nat_sub : Primrec₂ ((· - ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.sub
theorem nat_mul : Primrec₂ ((· * ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.mul
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Primrec c) (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => bif (c a) then (f a) else (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem ite {c : α → Prop} [DecidablePred c] {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : PrimrecPred c)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => if c a then f a else g a := by
simpa [Bool.cond_decide] using cond hc hf hg
theorem nat_le : PrimrecRel ((· ≤ ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_casesOn nat_sub (const true) (const false).to₂).of_eq fun p => by
dsimp [swap]
rcases e : p.1 - p.2 with - | n
· simp [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 e]
· simp [not_le.2 (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e)]
theorem nat_min : Primrec₂ (@min ℕ _) :=
ite nat_le fst snd
theorem nat_max : Primrec₂ (@max ℕ _) :=
ite (nat_le.comp fst snd) snd fst
theorem dom_bool (f : Bool → α) : Primrec f :=
(cond .id (const (f true)) (const (f false))).of_eq fun b => by cases b <;> rfl
theorem dom_bool₂ (f : Bool → Bool → α) : Primrec₂ f :=
(cond fst ((dom_bool (f true)).comp snd) ((dom_bool (f false)).comp snd)).of_eq fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
cases a <;> rfl
protected theorem not : Primrec not :=
dom_bool _
protected theorem and : Primrec₂ and :=
dom_bool₂ _
protected theorem or : Primrec₂ or :=
dom_bool₂ _
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.not {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) :
PrimrecPred fun a => ¬p a :=
(Primrec.not.comp hp).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.and {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∧ q a :=
(Primrec.and.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.or {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∨ q a :=
(Primrec.or.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem beq [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@BEq.beq α _) :=
have : PrimrecRel fun a b : ℕ => a = b :=
(PrimrecPred.and nat_le nat_le.swap).of_eq fun a => by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
(this.comp₂ (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
fun _ _ => encode_injective.eq_iff
protected theorem eq [DecidableEq α] : PrimrecRel (@Eq α) := Primrec.beq
theorem nat_lt : PrimrecRel ((· < ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_le.comp snd fst).not.of_eq fun p => by simp
theorem option_guard {p : α → β → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (p a b)] (hp : PrimrecRel p) {f : α → β}
(hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun a => Option.guard (p a) (f a) :=
ite (hp.comp Primrec.id hf) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (const none)
theorem option_orElse : Primrec₂ ((· <|> ·) : Option α → Option α → Option α) :=
(option_casesOn fst snd (fst.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun ⟨o₁, o₂⟩ => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> rfl
protected theorem decode₂ : Primrec (decode₂ α) :=
option_bind .decode <|
option_guard (Primrec.beq.comp₂ (by exact encode_iff.mpr snd) (by exact fst.comp fst)) snd
theorem list_findIdx₁ {p : α → β → Bool} (hp : Primrec₂ p) :
∀ l : List β, Primrec fun a => l.findIdx (p a)
| [] => const 0
| a :: l => (cond (hp.comp .id (const a)) (const 0) (succ.comp (list_findIdx₁ hp l))).of_eq fun n =>
by simp [List.findIdx_cons]
theorem list_idxOf₁ [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) : Primrec fun a => l.idxOf a :=
list_findIdx₁ (.swap .beq) l
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias list_indexOf₁ := list_idxOf₁
theorem dom_fintype [Finite α] (f : α → σ) : Primrec f :=
let ⟨l, _, m⟩ := Finite.exists_univ_list α
option_some_iff.1 <| by
haveI := decidableEqOfEncodable α
refine ((list_getElem?₁ (l.map f)).comp (list_idxOf₁ l)).of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_idxOf (m a), Option.map_some']
-- Porting note: These are new lemmas
-- I added it because it actually simplified the proofs
-- and because I couldn't understand the original proof
/-- A function is `PrimrecBounded` if its size is bounded by a primitive recursive function -/
def PrimrecBounded (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → ℕ, Primrec g ∧ ∀ x, encode (f x) ≤ g x
theorem nat_findGreatest {f : α → ℕ} {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x n, Decidable (p x n)]
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : PrimrecRel p) : Primrec fun x => (f x).findGreatest (p x) :=
(nat_rec' (h := fun x nih => if p x (nih.1 + 1) then nih.1 + 1 else nih.2)
hf (const 0) (ite (hp.comp fst (snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp))
(snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp) (snd.comp snd))).of_eq fun x => by
induction f x <;> simp [Nat.findGreatest, *]
/-- To show a function `f : α → ℕ` is primitive recursive, it is enough to show that the function
is bounded by a primitive recursive function and that its graph is primitive recursive -/
theorem of_graph {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : PrimrecBounded f)
(h₂ : PrimrecRel fun a b => f a = b) : Primrec f := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨g, pg, hg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x⟩
refine (nat_findGreatest pg h₂).of_eq fun n => ?_
exact (Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun b => f n = b) (hg n) rfl).symm
-- We show that division is primitive recursive by showing that the graph is
theorem nat_div : Primrec₂ ((· / ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) := by
refine of_graph ⟨_, fst, fun p => Nat.div_le_self _ _⟩ ?_
have : PrimrecRel fun (a : ℕ × ℕ) (b : ℕ) => (a.2 = 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨
(0 < a.2 ∧ b * a.2 ≤ a.1 ∧ a.1 < (b + 1) * a.2) :=
PrimrecPred.or
(.and (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp (fst |> snd.comp)) (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp snd))
(.and (nat_lt.comp (const 0) (fst |> snd.comp)) <|
.and (nat_le.comp (nat_mul.comp snd (fst |> snd.comp)) (fst |> fst.comp))
(nat_lt.comp (fst.comp fst) (nat_mul.comp (Primrec.succ.comp snd) (snd.comp fst))))
refine this.of_eq ?_
rintro ⟨a, k⟩ q
if H : k = 0 then simp [H, eq_comm]
else
have : q * k ≤ a ∧ a < (q + 1) * k ↔ q = a / k := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← (@Nat.lt_succ _ q), Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H),
Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H)]
simpa [H, zero_lt_iff, eq_comm (b := q)]
theorem nat_mod : Primrec₂ ((· % ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
(nat_sub.comp fst (nat_mul.comp snd nat_div)).to₂.of_eq fun m n => by
apply Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add
simp [add_comm (m % n), Nat.div_add_mod]
theorem nat_bodd : Primrec Nat.bodd :=
(Primrec.beq.comp (nat_mod.comp .id (const 2)) (const 1)).of_eq fun n => by
cases H : n.bodd <;> simp [Nat.mod_two_of_bodd, H]
theorem nat_div2 : Primrec Nat.div2 :=
(nat_div.comp .id (const 2)).of_eq fun n => n.div2_val.symm
theorem nat_double : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n) :=
nat_mul.comp (const _) Primrec.id
theorem nat_double_succ : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n + 1) :=
nat_double |> Primrec.succ.comp
end Primrec
section
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
variable (H : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (@decode (List β) _ n))
open Primrec
private def prim : Primcodable (List β) := ⟨H⟩
private theorem list_casesOn' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
letI := prim H
have :
@Primrec _ (Option σ) _ _ fun a =>
(@decode (Option (β × List β)) _ (encode (f a))).map fun o => Option.casesOn o (g a) (h a) :=
((@map_decode_iff _ (Option (β × List β)) _ _ _ _ _).2 <|
to₂ <|
option_casesOn snd (hg.comp fst) (hh.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) Primrec₂.right)).comp
.id (encode_iff.2 hf)
option_some_iff.1 <| this.of_eq fun a => by rcases f a with - | ⟨b, l⟩ <;> simp [encodek]
private theorem list_foldl' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) := by
letI := prim H
let G (a : α) (IH : σ × List β) : σ × List β := List.casesOn IH.2 IH fun b l => (h a (IH.1, b), l)
have hG : Primrec₂ G := list_casesOn' H (snd.comp snd) snd <|
to₂ <|
pair (hh.comp (fst.comp fst) <| pair ((fst.comp snd).comp fst) (fst.comp snd))
(snd.comp snd)
let F := fun (a : α) (n : ℕ) => (G a)^[n] (g a, f a)
have hF : Primrec fun a => (F a (encode (f a))).1 :=
(fst.comp <|
nat_iterate (encode_iff.2 hf) (pair hg hf) <|
hG)
suffices ∀ a n, F a n = (((f a).take n).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a), (f a).drop n) by
refine hF.of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [this, List.take_of_length_le (length_le_encode _)]
introv
dsimp only [F]
generalize f a = l
generalize g a = x
induction n generalizing l x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n IH =>
simp only [iterate_succ, comp_apply]
rcases l with - | ⟨b, l⟩ <;> simp [G, IH]
private theorem list_cons' : (haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ (@List.cons β)) :=
letI := prim H
| encode_iff.1 (succ.comp <| Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 fst) (encode_iff.2 snd))
private theorem list_reverse' :
haveI := prim H
Primrec (@List.reverse β) :=
| Mathlib/Computability/Primrec.lean | 771 | 775 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [closedBall, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, ←
NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ball_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => ball (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
theorem closedBall_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closedBall (s.sup p) x r = s.inf fun i => closedBall (p i) x r := by
rw [Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) : p.ball x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_ball, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_lt]
exact hr.trans (apply_nonneg p _)
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_emptyset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {x : E} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
p.closedBall x r = ∅ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.mem_closedBall, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_le]
exact hr.trans_le (apply_nonneg _ _)
theorem closedBall_smul_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {r₁ : ℝ} (hr₁ : r₁ ≠ 0) (r₂ : ℝ) :
| Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) r₁ • p.ball 0 r₂ ⊆ p.ball 0 (r₁ * r₂) := by
simp only [smul_subset_iff, mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, map_smul_eq_mul]
refine fun a ha b hb ↦ mul_lt_mul' ha hb (apply_nonneg _ _) ?_
exact hr₁.lt_or_lt.resolve_left <| ((norm_nonneg a).trans ha).not_lt
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 826 | 829 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Comap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
/-!
# Restricting a measure to a subset or a subtype
Given a measure `μ` on a type `α` and a subset `s` of `α`, we define a measure `μ.restrict s` as
the restriction of `μ` to `s` (still as a measure on `α`).
We investigate how this notion interacts with usual operations on measures (sum, pushforward,
pullback), and on sets (inclusion, union, Union).
We also study the relationship between the restriction of a measure to a subtype (given by the
pullback under `Subtype.val`) and the restriction to a set as above.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter MeasurableSpace ENNReal Function
variable {R α β δ γ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-! ### Restricting a measure -/
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s` as an `ℝ≥0∞`-linear map. -/
noncomputable def restrictₗ {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.restrict s) fun μ s' hs' t => by
suffices μ (s ∩ t) = μ (s ∩ t ∩ s') + μ ((s ∩ t) \ s') by
simpa [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ s, ← inter_diff_assoc]
exact le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _ _ hs' _
/-- Restrict a measure `μ` to a set `s`. -/
noncomputable def restrict {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : Measure α :=
restrictₗ s μ
@[simp]
theorem restrictₗ_apply {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α) :
restrictₗ s μ = μ.restrict s :=
rfl
/-- This lemma shows that `restrict` and `toOuterMeasure` commute. Note that the LHS has a
restrict on measures and the RHS has a restrict on outer measures. -/
theorem restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict (h : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict s).toOuterMeasure = OuterMeasure.restrict s μ.toOuterMeasure := by
simp_rw [restrict, restrictₗ, liftLinear, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
toMeasure_toOuterMeasure, OuterMeasure.restrict_trim h, μ.trimmed]
theorem restrict_apply₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t (μ.restrict s)) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrictₗ_apply, restrictₗ, liftLinear_apply₀ _ ht, OuterMeasure.restrict_apply,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
/-- If `t` is a measurable set, then the measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. An alternate version requiring that `s`
be measurable instead of `t` exists as `Measure.restrict_apply'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) :=
restrict_apply₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
theorem restrict_mono' {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hs : s ≤ᵐ[μ] s')
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s') := (measure_mono_ae <| hs.mono fun _x hx ⟨hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨hxt, hx hxs⟩)
_ ≤ ν (t ∩ s') := le_iff'.1 hμν (t ∩ s')
_ = ν.restrict s' t := (restrict_apply ht).symm
/-- Restriction of a measure to a subset is monotone both in set and in measure. -/
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s s' : Set α⦄ (hs : s ⊆ s') ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄
(hμν : μ ≤ ν) : μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s' :=
restrict_mono' (ae_of_all _ hs) hμν
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} (h : μ ≤ ν) (s : Set α) :
μ.restrict s ≤ ν.restrict s :=
restrict_mono subset_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem restrict_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono h le_rfl
theorem restrict_mono_ae (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s ≤ μ.restrict t :=
restrict_mono' h (le_refl μ)
theorem restrict_congr_set (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : μ.restrict s = μ.restrict t :=
le_antisymm (restrict_mono_ae h.le) (restrict_mono_ae h.symm.le)
/-- If `s` is a measurable set, then the outer measure of `t` with respect to the restriction of
the measure to `s` equals the outer measure of `t ∩ s`. This is an alternate version of
`Measure.restrict_apply`, requiring that `s` is measurable instead of `t`. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← toOuterMeasure_apply,
Measure.restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict hs,
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply s t _, toOuterMeasure_apply]
theorem restrict_apply₀' (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := by
rw [← restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq,
restrict_apply' (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_congr ((ae_eq_refl t).inter hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq)]
theorem restrict_le_self : μ.restrict s ≤ μ :=
Measure.le_iff.2 fun t ht => calc
μ.restrict s t = μ (t ∩ s) := restrict_apply ht
_ ≤ μ t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
variable (μ)
theorem restrict_eq_self (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict t s = μ s :=
(le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self s).antisymm <|
calc
μ s ≤ μ (toMeasurable (μ.restrict t) s ∩ t) :=
measure_mono (subset_inter (subset_toMeasurable _ _) h)
_ = μ.restrict t s := by
rw [← restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _), measure_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply_self (s : Set α) : (μ.restrict s) s = μ s :=
restrict_eq_self μ Subset.rfl
variable {μ}
theorem restrict_apply_univ (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s univ = μ s := by
rw [restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
theorem le_restrict_apply (s t : Set α) : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ μ.restrict s t :=
calc
μ (t ∩ s) = μ.restrict s (t ∩ s) := (restrict_eq_self μ inter_subset_right).symm
_ ≤ μ.restrict s t := measure_mono inter_subset_left
theorem restrict_apply_le (s t : Set α) : μ.restrict s t ≤ μ t :=
Measure.le_iff'.1 restrict_le_self _
theorem restrict_apply_superset (h : s ⊆ t) : μ.restrict s t = μ s :=
((measure_mono (subset_univ _)).trans_eq <| restrict_apply_univ _).antisymm
((restrict_apply_self μ s).symm.trans_le <| measure_mono h)
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ + ν).restrict s = μ.restrict s + ν.restrict s :=
(restrictₗ s).map_add μ ν
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Set α) : (0 : Measure α).restrict s = 0 :=
(restrictₗ s).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem restrict_smul {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ).restrict s = c • μ.restrict s := by
simpa only [smul_one_smul] using (restrictₗ s).map_smul (c • 1) μ
theorem restrict_restrict₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.restrict t)) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by
simp only [Set.inter_assoc, restrict_apply hu,
restrict_apply₀ (hu.nullMeasurableSet.inter hs)]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_restrict_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
rw [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply hu, restrict_eq_self]
exact inter_subset_right.trans h
theorem restrict_restrict₀' (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
ext fun u hu => by simp only [restrict_apply hu, restrict_apply₀' ht, inter_assoc]
theorem restrict_restrict' (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = μ.restrict (s ∩ t) :=
restrict_restrict₀' ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_comm (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict t).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).restrict t := by
rw [restrict_restrict hs, restrict_restrict' hs, inter_comm]
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply ht]
theorem measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict (h : μ.restrict s t = 0) : μ (t ∩ s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 (h ▸ le_restrict_apply _ _)
theorem restrict_apply_eq_zero' (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict s t = 0 ↔ μ (t ∩ s) = 0 := by
rw [restrict_apply' hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_eq_zero : μ.restrict s = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, restrict_apply_univ]
/-- If `μ s ≠ 0`, then `μ.restrict s ≠ 0`, in terms of `NeZero` instances. -/
instance restrict.neZero [NeZero (μ s)] : NeZero (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨mt restrict_eq_zero.mp <| NeZero.ne _⟩
theorem restrict_zero_set {s : Set α} (h : μ s = 0) : μ.restrict s = 0 :=
restrict_eq_zero.2 h
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : μ.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
restrict_zero_set measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : μ.restrict univ = μ :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs]
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s := by
ext1 u hu
simp only [add_apply, restrict_apply hu, ← inter_assoc, diff_eq]
exact measure_inter_add_diff₀ (u ∩ s) ht
theorem restrict_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∩ t) + μ.restrict (s \ t) = μ.restrict s :=
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter₀ (s : Set α) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [← restrict_inter_add_diff₀ (s ∪ t) ht, union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, add_comm, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
theorem restrict_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) + μ.restrict (s ∩ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simpa only [union_comm, inter_comm, add_comm] using restrict_union_add_inter t hs
theorem restrict_union₀ (h : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
simp [← restrict_union_add_inter₀ s ht, restrict_zero_set h]
theorem restrict_union (h : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t :=
restrict_union₀ h.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_union' (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = μ.restrict s + μ.restrict t := by
rw [union_comm, restrict_union h.symm hs, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_add_restrict_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s + μ.restrict sᶜ = μ := by
rw [← restrict_union (@disjoint_compl_right (Set α) _ _) hs.compl, union_compl_self,
restrict_univ]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_compl_add_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) : μ.restrict sᶜ + μ.restrict s = μ := by
rw [add_comm, restrict_add_restrict_compl hs]
theorem restrict_union_le (s s' : Set α) : μ.restrict (s ∪ s') ≤ μ.restrict s + μ.restrict s' :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by
simpa [ht, inter_union_distrib_left] using measure_union_le (t ∩ s) (t ∩ s')
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply, ht, inter_iUnion]
exact
measure_iUnion₀ (hd.mono fun i j h => h.mono inter_subset_right inter_subset_right)
fun i => ht.nullMeasurableSet.inter (hm i)
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) {t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ∑' i, μ.restrict (s i) t :=
restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd.aedisjoint (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) ht
theorem restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : Set α} (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) t = ⨆ i, μ.restrict (s i) t := by
simp only [restrict_apply ht, inter_iUnion]
rw [Directed.measure_iUnion]
exacts [hd.mono_comp _ fun s₁ s₂ => inter_subset_inter_right _]
/-- The restriction of the pushforward measure is the pushforward of the restriction. For a version
assuming only `AEMeasurable`, see `restrict_map_of_aemeasurable`. -/
theorem restrict_map {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.map f).restrict s = (μ.restrict <| f ⁻¹' s).map f :=
ext fun t ht => by simp [*, hf ht]
theorem restrict_toMeasurable (h : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_inter ht h,
inter_comm]
theorem restrict_eq_self_of_ae_mem {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃μ : Measure α⦄
(hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s) : μ.restrict s = μ :=
calc
μ.restrict s = μ.restrict univ := restrict_congr_set (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr hs)
_ = μ := restrict_univ
theorem restrict_congr_meas (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, MeasurableSet t → μ t = ν t :=
⟨fun H t hts ht => by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hts, ← restrict_apply ht, H, restrict_apply ht], fun H =>
ext fun t ht => by
rw [restrict_apply ht, restrict_apply ht, H _ inter_subset_right (ht.inter hs)]⟩
theorem restrict_congr_mono (hs : s ⊆ t) (h : μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t) :
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [← restrict_restrict_of_subset hs, h, restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
/-- If two measures agree on all measurable subsets of `s` and `t`, then they agree on all
measurable subsets of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem restrict_union_congr :
μ.restrict (s ∪ t) = ν.restrict (s ∪ t) ↔
μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s ∧ μ.restrict t = ν.restrict t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨restrict_congr_mono subset_union_left h,
restrict_congr_mono subset_union_right h⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu, inter_union_distrib_left]
rcases exists_measurable_superset₂ μ ν (u ∩ s) with ⟨US, hsub, hm, hμ, hν⟩
calc
μ (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) = μ (US ∪ u ∩ t) :=
measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hμ.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
_ = μ US + μ ((u ∩ t) \ US) := (measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _).symm
_ = restrict μ s u + restrict μ t (u \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hμ, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = restrict ν s u + restrict ν t (u \ US) := by rw [hs, ht]
_ = ν US + ν ((u ∩ t) \ US) := by
simp only [restrict_apply, hu, hu.diff hm, hν, ← inter_comm t, inter_diff_assoc]
_ = ν (US ∪ u ∩ t) := measure_add_diff hm.nullMeasurableSet _
_ = ν (u ∩ s ∪ u ∩ t) := .symm <| measure_union_congr_of_subset hsub hν.le Subset.rfl le_rfl
theorem restrict_finset_biUnion_congr {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s _ hs; · simp
simp only [forall_eq_or_imp, iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left, Finset.mem_insert]
rw [restrict_union_congr, ← hs]
theorem restrict_iUnion_congr [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
refine ⟨fun h i => restrict_congr_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) h, fun h => ?_⟩
ext1 t ht
have D : Directed (· ⊆ ·) fun t : Finset ι => ⋃ i ∈ t, s i :=
Monotone.directed_le fun t₁ t₂ ht => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left ht
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset]
simp only [restrict_iUnion_apply_eq_iSup D ht, restrict_finset_biUnion_congr.2 fun i _ => h i]
theorem restrict_biUnion_congr {s : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (hc : s.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) = ν.restrict (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) ↔
∀ i ∈ s, μ.restrict (t i) = ν.restrict (t i) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, SetCoe.forall', restrict_iUnion_congr]
theorem restrict_sUnion_congr {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) :
μ.restrict (⋃₀ S) = ν.restrict (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, restrict_biUnion_congr hc]
/-- This lemma shows that `Inf` and `restrict` commute for measures. -/
theorem restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {m : Set (Measure α)}
(hm : m.Nonempty) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
(sInf m).restrict t = sInf ((fun μ : Measure α => μ.restrict t) '' m) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sInf_apply hs, restrict_apply hs, sInf_apply (MeasurableSet.inter hs ht),
Set.image_image, restrict_toOuterMeasure_eq_toOuterMeasure_restrict ht, ←
Set.image_image _ toOuterMeasure, ← OuterMeasure.restrict_sInf_eq_sInf_restrict _ (hm.image _),
OuterMeasure.restrict_apply]
theorem exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae (hs : μ s ≠ 0) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) : ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
rw [← μ.restrict_apply_self, ← frequently_ae_mem_iff] at hs
exact (hs.and_eventually hp).exists
/-- If a quasi measure preserving map `f` maps a set `s` to a set `t`,
then it is quasi measure preserving with respect to the restrictions of the measures. -/
theorem QuasiMeasurePreserving.restrict {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β}
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) {t : Set β} (hmaps : MapsTo f s t) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f (μ.restrict s) (ν.restrict t) where
measurable := hf.measurable
absolutelyContinuous := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun u hum ↦ ?_
suffices ν (u ∩ t) = 0 → μ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ s) = 0 by simpa [hum, hf.measurable, hf.measurable hum]
refine fun hu ↦ measure_mono_null ?_ (hf.preimage_null hu)
rw [preimage_inter]
gcongr
assumption
/-! ### Extensionality results -/
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `Union`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ⋃ i, s i = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ i, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_iUnion_congr, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_iUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_iUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `biUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ {S : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hc : S.Countable)
(hs : ⋃ i ∈ S, s i = univ) : μ = ν ↔ ∀ i ∈ S, μ.restrict (s i) = ν.restrict (s i) := by
rw [← restrict_biUnion_congr hc, hs, restrict_univ, restrict_univ]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_biUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ
/-- Two measures are equal if they have equal restrictions on a spanning collection of sets
(formulated using `sUnion`). -/
theorem ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (hc : S.Countable) (hs : ⋃₀ S = univ) :
μ = ν ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ.restrict s = ν.restrict s :=
ext_iff_of_biUnion_eq_univ hc <| by rwa [← sUnion_eq_biUnion]
alias ⟨_, ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ⟩ := ext_iff_of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(hc : T.Countable) (h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ) (htop : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t ≠ ∞)
(ST_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, ∀ s ∈ S, μ (s ∩ t) = ν (s ∩ t)) (T_eq : ∀ t ∈ T, μ t = ν t) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_sUnion_eq_univ hc hU fun t ht => ?_
ext1 u hu
simp only [restrict_apply hu]
induction u, hu using induction_on_inter h_gen h_inter with
| empty => simp only [Set.empty_inter, measure_empty]
| basic u hu => exact ST_eq _ ht _ hu
| compl u hu ihu =>
have := T_eq t ht
rw [Set.inter_comm] at ihu ⊢
rwa [← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← measure_inter_add_diff t hu, ← ihu,
ENNReal.add_right_inj] at this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (htop t ht) (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)
| iUnion f hfd hfm ihf =>
simp only [← restrict_apply (hfm _), ← restrict_apply (MeasurableSet.iUnion hfm)] at ihf ⊢
simp only [measure_iUnion hfd hfm, ihf]
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `sUnion`. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset {S T : Set (Set α)} (h_gen : ‹_› = generateFrom S)
(h_inter : IsPiSystem S) (h_sub : T ⊆ S) (hc : T.Countable) (hU : ⋃₀ T = univ)
(htop : ∀ s ∈ T, μ s ≠ ∞) (h_eq : ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover h_gen hc h_inter hU htop ?_ fun t ht => h_eq t (h_sub ht)
intro t ht s hs; rcases (s ∩ t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with H | H
· simp only [H, measure_empty]
· exact h_eq _ (h_inter _ hs _ (h_sub ht) H)
/-- Two measures are equal if they are equal on the π-system generating the σ-algebra,
and they are both finite on an increasing spanning sequence of sets in the π-system.
This lemma is formulated using `iUnion`.
`FiniteSpanningSetsIn.ext` is a reformulation of this lemma. -/
theorem ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion (C : Set (Set α)) (B : ℕ → Set α) (hA : ‹_› = generateFrom C)
(hC : IsPiSystem C) (h1B : ⋃ i, B i = univ) (h2B : ∀ i, B i ∈ C) (hμB : ∀ i, μ (B i) ≠ ∞)
(h_eq : ∀ s ∈ C, μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
refine ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover_subset hA hC ?_ (countable_range B) h1B ?_ h_eq
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply h2B
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
apply hμB
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply, restrict_apply, ht, ht.inter hs]
@[simp]
theorem restrict_sum_of_countable [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(sum μ).restrict s = sum fun i => (μ i).restrict s := by
ext t ht
simp_rw [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_apply ht, sum_apply_of_countable]
lemma AbsolutelyContinuous.restrict (h : μ ≪ ν) (s : Set α) : μ.restrict s ≪ ν.restrict s := by
refine Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk (fun t ht htν ↦ ?_)
rw [restrict_apply ht] at htν ⊢
exact h htν
theorem restrict_iUnion_ae [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
ext fun t ht => by simp only [sum_apply _ ht, restrict_iUnion_apply_ae hd hm ht]
theorem restrict_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) : μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) = sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
restrict_iUnion_ae hd.aedisjoint fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet
theorem restrict_iUnion_le [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i) ≤ sum fun i => μ.restrict (s i) :=
le_iff.2 fun t ht ↦ by simpa [ht, inter_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_le (t ∩ s ·)
end Measure
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_eq [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) = ⨆ i, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
le_antisymm ((ae_sum_eq fun i => μ.restrict (s i)) ▸ ae_mono restrict_iUnion_le) <|
iSup_le fun i => ae_mono <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion s i) le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_union_eq (s t : Set α) :
ae (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) = ae (μ.restrict s) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict t) := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_eq (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, ← iSup_subtype'']
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) :
ae (μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)) = ⨆ i ∈ t, ae (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s t.countable_toSet
theorem ae_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_union_iff (s t : Set α) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∪ t), p x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, p x := by simp
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, mem_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i), p x) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s i), p x := by
simp_rw [Filter.Eventually, ae_restrict_biUnion_finset_eq s, mem_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iUnion_eq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff (s : ι → Set α) {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g := by
simp_rw [ae_restrict_biUnion_eq s ht, EventuallyEq, eventually_iSup]
theorem ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_finset_iff (s : ι → Set α) (t : Finset ι) (f g : α → δ) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (⋃ i ∈ t, s i)] g ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, f =ᵐ[μ.restrict (s i)] g :=
ae_eq_restrict_biUnion_iff s t.countable_toSet f g
open scoped Interval in
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_eq [LinearOrder α] (a b : α) :
ae (μ.restrict (Ι a b)) = ae (μ.restrict (Ioc a b)) ⊔ ae (μ.restrict (Ioc b a)) := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, ae_restrict_union_eq]
open scoped Interval in
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), P x) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc a b), P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (Ioc b a), P x := by
rw [ae_restrict_uIoc_eq, eventually_sup]
theorem ae_restrict_iff₀ {p : α → Prop} (hp : NullMeasurableSet { x | p x } (μ.restrict s)) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, Measure.restrict_apply₀ hp.compl]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff {p : α → Prop} (hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff₀ hp.nullMeasurableSet
theorem ae_imp_of_ae_restrict {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff] at h ⊢
simpa [setOf_and, inter_comm] using measure_inter_eq_zero_of_restrict h
theorem ae_restrict_iff'₀ {p : α → Prop} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, ← compl_setOf, restrict_apply₀' hs]
rw [iff_iff_eq]; congr with x; simp [and_comm]
theorem ae_restrict_iff' {p : α → Prop} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → p x :=
ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet
|
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.restrict {f g : α → δ} {s : Set α} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Restrict.lean | 576 | 578 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
/-!
# Cyclotomic extensions
Let `A` and `B` be commutative rings with `Algebra A B`. For `S : Set ℕ+`, we define a class
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` expressing the fact that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th
primitive roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` : means that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th primitive
roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
* `CyclotomicField`: given `n : ℕ+` and a field `K`, we define `CyclotomicField n K` as the
splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`. If `n` is nonzero in `K`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K (CyclotomicField n K)`.
* `CyclotomicRing` : if `A` is a domain with fraction field `K` and `n : ℕ+`, we define
`CyclotomicRing n A K` as the `A`-subalgebra of `CyclotomicField n K` generated by the roots of
`X ^ n - 1`. If `n` is nonzero in `A`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A (CyclotomicRing n A K)`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` and
`IsCyclotomicExtension T B C`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C` if
`Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }) B`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension T A B` and `S ⊆ T`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 })`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.finite` : if `S` is finite and `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B`, then
`B` is a finite `A`-algebra.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField` : a finite cyclotomic extension of a number field is a
number field.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.isSplittingField_X_pow_sub_one` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `X ^ n - 1`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.splitting_field_cyclotomic` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `IsCyclotomicExtension` is very general, to allow rings of any characteristic
and infinite extensions, but it will mainly be used in the case `S = {n}` and for integral domains.
All results are in the `IsCyclotomicExtension` namespace.
Note that some results, for example `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finite`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.isGalois` and
`CyclotomicField.algebraBase` are lemmas, but they can be made local instances. Some of them are
included in the `Cyclotomic` locale.
-/
open Polynomial Algebra Module Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
/-- Given an `A`-algebra `B` and `S : Set ℕ+`, we define `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` requiring
that there is an `n`-th primitive root of unity in `B` for all `n ∈ S` and that `B` is generated
over `A` by the roots of `X ^ n - 1`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
/-- For all `n ∈ S`, there exists a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `B`. -/
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
/-- The `n`-th roots of unity, for `n ∈ S`, generate `B` as an `A`-algebra. -/
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` that uses `⊤`. -/
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` in the case `S` is a singleton. -/
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`. -/
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ _ _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
variable (A B)
/-- Transitivity of cyclotomic extensions. -/
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· rcases hn with hn | hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (hx := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy)
fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← map_pow, hn.2, map_one]⟩⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `S ∪ T`, then `B`
is a cyclotomic extension of `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` given by
roots of unity of order in `T`. -/
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `T` and `S ⊆ T`,
then `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` is a cyclotomic extension of `B`
given by roots of unity of order in `S`. -/
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
variable {n S}
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` implies
`IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := H.exists_prim_root hm
refine ⟨ζ ^ (x : ℕ), ?_⟩
convert hζ.pow_of_dvd x.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left (x : ℕ) s)
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, Nat.mul_div_left, PNat.pos]
· refine _root_.eq_top_iff.2 ?_
rw [← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top S A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hx
exact ⟨m, ⟨Or.inr hm.1, hm.2⟩⟩
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` if and only if
`IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem iff_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine
⟨fun H => of_union_of_dvd A B h hS, fun H => (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact H.exists_prim_root (subset_union_left hs)
· rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, rfl | hm, hxpow⟩ := hx
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy, ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := h y hy
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, pow_mul, hxpow, one_pow]
· exact ⟨m, ⟨hm, hxpow⟩⟩
variable (n S)
/-- `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` is equivalent to `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B`. -/
theorem iff_union_singleton_one :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B := by
obtain hS | rfl := S.eq_empty_or_nonempty.symm
· exact iff_union_of_dvd _ _ (fun s _ => one_dvd _) hS
rw [empty_union]
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ⟨1, by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hs]⟩, ?_⟩
simp [adjoin_singleton_one, empty]
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => (not_mem_empty s hs).elim, ?_⟩
simp [@singleton_one A B _ _ _ H]
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`. -/
theorem singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B := by
convert (iff_union_singleton_one _ A _).1 (singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top h)
simp
/-- If `Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`. -/
theorem singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B :=
singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (surjective_algebraMap_iff.1 h).symm
variable (A B)
/-- Given `(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C)`, if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A C`. -/
protected
theorem equiv {C : Type*} [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B]
(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) : IsCyclotomicExtension S A C := by
letI : Algebra B C := f.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} B C := singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective f.surjective
haveI : IsScalarTower A B C := IsScalarTower.of_algHom f.toAlgHom
exact (iff_union_singleton_one _ _ _).2 (trans S {1} A B C f.injective)
protected
theorem neZero [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] [IsDomain B] : NeZero ((n : ℕ) : B) := by
obtain ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, -⟩ := (iff_singleton n A B).1 h
exact hr.neZero'
protected
theorem neZero' [IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] [IsDomain B] : NeZero ((n : ℕ) : A) := by
haveI := IsCyclotomicExtension.neZero n A B
exact NeZero.nat_of_neZero (algebraMap A B)
end Basic
section Fintype
theorem finite_of_singleton [IsDomain B] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] :
Module.Finite A B := by
classical
rw [Module.finite_def, ← top_toSubmodule, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ _ _).1 h).2]
refine fg_adjoin_of_finite ?_ fun b hb => ?_
· simp only [mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
have : {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = (nthRoots n (1 : B)).toFinset :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using h, fun h => by simpa using h⟩
rw [this]
exact (nthRoots (↑n) 1).toFinset.finite_toSet
· simp only [mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left, mem_setOf_eq] at hb
exact ⟨X ^ (n : ℕ) - 1, ⟨monic_X_pow_sub_C _ n.pos.ne.symm, by simp [hb]⟩⟩
/-- If `S` is finite and `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B`, then `B` is a finite `A`-algebra. -/
protected theorem finite [IsDomain B] [h₁ : Finite S] [h₂ : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
Module.Finite A B := by
rw [finite_coe_iff] at h₁
induction S, h₁ using Set.Finite.induction_on generalizing h₂ A B with
| empty =>
refine Module.finite_def.2 ⟨({1} : Finset B), ?_⟩
simp [← top_toSubmodule, ← empty, toSubmodule_bot, Submodule.one_eq_span]
| @insert n S _ _ H =>
| haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}) :=
union_left _ (insert n S) _ _ (subset_insert n S)
haveI := H A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1})
have : Module.Finite (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
rw [← union_singleton] at h₂
let _ := union_right S {n} A B
exact finite_of_singleton n _ _
exact Module.Finite.trans (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}) _
/-- A cyclotomic finite extension of a number field is a number field. -/
theorem numberField [h : NumberField K] [Finite S] [IsCyclotomicExtension S K L] : NumberField L :=
{ to_charZero := charZero_of_injective_algebraMap (algebraMap K L).injective
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 306 | 317 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Images of intervals under `(+ d)`
The lemmas in this file state that addition maps intervals bijectively. The typeclass
`ExistsAddOfLE` is defined specifically to make them work when combined with
`OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid`; the lemmas below therefore apply to all
`OrderedAddCommGroup`, but also to `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0`, which are not groups.
-/
namespace Set
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid M]
[ExistsAddOfLE M] (a b c d : M)
theorem Ici_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ici a) (Ici (a + d)) := by
refine
⟨fun x h => add_le_add_right (mem_Ici.mp h) _, (add_left_injective d).injOn, fun _ h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ici.mp h)
rw [mem_Ici, add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right] at h
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw [add_right_comm]⟩
theorem Ioi_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ioi a) (Ioi (a + d)) := by
refine
⟨fun x h => add_lt_add_right (mem_Ioi.mp h) _, fun _ _ _ _ h => add_right_cancel h, fun _ h =>
?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ioi.mp h).le
rw [mem_Ioi, add_right_comm, add_lt_add_iff_right] at h
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw [add_right_comm]⟩
theorem Icc_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Icc a b) (Icc (a + d) (b + d)) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
exact
(Ici_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_le_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
le_of_add_le_add_right hx.2
theorem Ioo_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ioo a b) (Ioo (a + d) (b + d)) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iio]
exact
(Ioi_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_lt_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
lt_of_add_lt_add_right hx.2
theorem Ioc_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ioc a b) (Ioc (a + d) (b + d)) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
exact
(Ioi_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_le_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
le_of_add_le_add_right hx.2
theorem Ico_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ico a b) (Ico (a + d) (b + d)) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iio]
exact
(Ici_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_lt_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
lt_of_add_lt_add_right hx.2
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) '' Ici b = Ici (b + a) :=
(Ici_add_bij _ _).image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) :=
(Ioi_add_bij _ _).image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) :=
(Icc_add_bij _ _ _).image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) :=
(Ico_add_bij _ _ _).image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) :=
(Ioc_add_bij _ _ _).image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) :=
(Ioo_add_bij _ _ _).image_eq
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) '' Ici b = Ici (a + b) := by
simp only [add_comm a, image_add_const_Ici]
@[simp]
theorem image_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) '' Ioi b = Ioi (a + b) := by
simp only [add_comm a, image_add_const_Ioi]
@[simp]
theorem image_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a + b) (a + c) := by
simp only [add_comm a, image_add_const_Icc]
@[simp]
theorem image_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) '' Ico b c = Ico (a + b) (a + c) := by
simp only [add_comm a, image_add_const_Ico]
@[simp]
theorem image_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (a + b) (a + c) := by
simp only [add_comm a, image_add_const_Ioc]
@[simp]
theorem image_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a + b) (a + c) := by
simp only [add_comm a, image_add_const_Ioo]
|
end Set
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Set/Monoid.lean | 123 | 124 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Opposites
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
/-!
# Definitions of group actions
This file defines a hierarchy of group action type-classes on top of the previously defined
notation classes `SMul` and its additive version `VAdd`:
* `MulAction M α` and its additive version `AddAction G P` are typeclasses used for
actions of multiplicative and additive monoids and groups; they extend notation classes
`SMul` and `VAdd` that are defined in `Algebra.Group.Defs`;
* `DistribMulAction M A` is a typeclass for an action of a multiplicative monoid on
an additive monoid such that `a • (b + c) = a • b + a • c` and `a • 0 = 0`.
The hierarchy is extended further by `Module`, defined elsewhere.
Also provided are typeclasses regarding the interaction of different group actions,
* `SMulCommClass M N α` and its additive version `VAddCommClass M N α`;
* `IsScalarTower M N α` and its additive version `VAddAssocClass M N α`;
* `IsCentralScalar M α` and its additive version `IsCentralVAdd M N α`.
## Notation
- `a • b` is used as notation for `SMul.smul a b`.
- `a +ᵥ b` is used as notation for `VAdd.vadd a b`.
## Implementation details
This file should avoid depending on other parts of `GroupTheory`, to avoid import cycles.
More sophisticated lemmas belong in `GroupTheory.GroupAction`.
## Tags
group action
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function (Injective Surjective)
variable {M N G H α β γ δ : Type*}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- See also `Monoid.toMulAction` and `MulZeroClass.toSMulWithZero`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `AddMonoid.toAddAction`"]
instance (priority := 910) Mul.toSMul (α : Type*) [Mul α] : SMul α α := ⟨(· * ·)⟩
/-- Like `Mul.toSMul`, but multiplies on the right.
See also `Monoid.toOppositeMulAction` and `MonoidWithZero.toOppositeMulActionWithZero`. -/
@[to_additive "Like `Add.toVAdd`, but adds on the right.
See also `AddMonoid.toOppositeAddAction`."]
instance (priority := 910) Mul.toSMulMulOpposite (α : Type*) [Mul α] : SMul αᵐᵒᵖ α where
smul a b := b * a.unop
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_eq_mul {α : Type*} [Mul α] (a b : α) : a • b = a * b := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma op_smul_eq_mul {α : Type*} [Mul α] (a b : α) : MulOpposite.op a • b = b * a := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MulOpposite.smul_eq_mul_unop [Mul α] (a : αᵐᵒᵖ) (b : α) : a • b = b * a.unop := rfl
/-- Type class for additive monoid actions. -/
class AddAction (G : Type*) (P : Type*) [AddMonoid G] extends VAdd G P where
/-- Zero is a neutral element for `+ᵥ` -/
protected zero_vadd : ∀ p : P, (0 : G) +ᵥ p = p
/-- Associativity of `+` and `+ᵥ` -/
add_vadd : ∀ (g₁ g₂ : G) (p : P), (g₁ + g₂) +ᵥ p = g₁ +ᵥ g₂ +ᵥ p
/-- Typeclass for multiplicative actions by monoids. This generalizes group actions. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
class MulAction (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [Monoid α] extends SMul α β where
/-- One is the neutral element for `•` -/
protected one_smul : ∀ b : β, (1 : α) • b = b
/-- Associativity of `•` and `*` -/
mul_smul : ∀ (x y : α) (b : β), (x * y) • b = x • y • b
/-! ### Scalar tower and commuting actions -/
/-- A typeclass mixin saying that two additive actions on the same space commute. -/
class VAddCommClass (M N α : Type*) [VAdd M α] [VAdd N α] : Prop where
/-- `+ᵥ` is left commutative -/
vadd_comm : ∀ (m : M) (n : N) (a : α), m +ᵥ (n +ᵥ a) = n +ᵥ (m +ᵥ a)
/-- A typeclass mixin saying that two multiplicative actions on the same space commute. -/
@[to_additive]
class SMulCommClass (M N α : Type*) [SMul M α] [SMul N α] : Prop where
/-- `•` is left commutative -/
smul_comm : ∀ (m : M) (n : N) (a : α), m • n • a = n • m • a
export MulAction (mul_smul)
export AddAction (add_vadd)
export SMulCommClass (smul_comm)
export VAddCommClass (vadd_comm)
library_note "bundled maps over different rings"/--
Frequently, we find ourselves wanting to express a bilinear map `M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P` or an
equivalence between maps `(M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[R] (M' →ₗ[R] N')` where the maps have an associated ring
`R`. Unfortunately, using definitions like these requires that `R` satisfy `CommSemiring R`, and
not just `Semiring R`. Using `M →ₗ[R] N →+ P` and `(M →ₗ[R] N) ≃+ (M' →ₗ[R] N')` avoids this
problem, but throws away structure that is useful for when we _do_ have a commutative (semi)ring.
To avoid making this compromise, we instead state these definitions as `M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[S] P` or
`(M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[S] (M' →ₗ[R] N')` and require `SMulCommClass S R` on the appropriate modules. When
the caller has `CommSemiring R`, they can set `S = R` and `smulCommClass_self` will populate the
instance. If the caller only has `Semiring R` they can still set either `R = ℕ` or `S = ℕ`, and
`AddCommMonoid.nat_smulCommClass` or `AddCommMonoid.nat_smulCommClass'` will populate
the typeclass, which is still sufficient to recover a `≃+` or `→+` structure.
An example of where this is used is `LinearMap.prod_equiv`.
-/
/-- Commutativity of actions is a symmetric relation. This lemma can't be an instance because this
would cause a loop in the instance search graph. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma SMulCommClass.symm (M N α : Type*) [SMul M α] [SMul N α] [SMulCommClass M N α] :
SMulCommClass N M α where smul_comm a' a b := (smul_comm a a' b).symm
/-- Commutativity of additive actions is a symmetric relation. This lemma can't be an instance
because this would cause a loop in the instance search graph. -/
add_decl_doc VAddCommClass.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma Function.Injective.smulCommClass [SMul M α] [SMul N α] [SMul M β] [SMul N β]
[SMulCommClass M N β] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (h₁ : ∀ (c : M) x, f (c • x) = c • f x)
(h₂ : ∀ (c : N) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) : SMulCommClass M N α where
smul_comm c₁ c₂ x := hf <| by simp only [h₁, h₂, smul_comm c₁ c₂ (f x)]
@[to_additive]
lemma Function.Surjective.smulCommClass [SMul M α] [SMul N α] [SMul M β] [SMul N β]
[SMulCommClass M N α] {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (h₁ : ∀ (c : M) x, f (c • x) = c • f x)
(h₂ : ∀ (c : N) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) : SMulCommClass M N β where
smul_comm c₁ c₂ := hf.forall.2 fun x ↦ by simp only [← h₁, ← h₂, smul_comm c₁ c₂ x]
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_self (M α : Type*) [CommMonoid M] [MulAction M α] : SMulCommClass M M α where
smul_comm a a' b := by rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
/-- An instance of `VAddAssocClass M N α` states that the additive action of `M` on `α` is
determined by the additive actions of `M` on `N` and `N` on `α`. -/
class VAddAssocClass (M N α : Type*) [VAdd M N] [VAdd N α] [VAdd M α] : Prop where
/-- Associativity of `+ᵥ` -/
vadd_assoc : ∀ (x : M) (y : N) (z : α), (x +ᵥ y) +ᵥ z = x +ᵥ y +ᵥ z
/-- An instance of `IsScalarTower M N α` states that the multiplicative
action of `M` on `α` is determined by the multiplicative actions of `M` on `N`
and `N` on `α`. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsScalarTower (M N α : Type*) [SMul M N] [SMul N α] [SMul M α] : Prop where
/-- Associativity of `•` -/
smul_assoc : ∀ (x : M) (y : N) (z : α), (x • y) • z = x • y • z
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_assoc {M N} [SMul M N] [SMul N α] [SMul M α] [IsScalarTower M N α] (x : M) (y : N)
(z : α) : (x • y) • z = x • y • z := IsScalarTower.smul_assoc x y z
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.isScalarTower [Semigroup α] : IsScalarTower α α α := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- A typeclass indicating that the right (aka `AddOpposite`) and left actions by `M` on `α` are
equal, that is that `M` acts centrally on `α`. This can be thought of as a version of commutativity
for `+ᵥ`. -/
class IsCentralVAdd (M α : Type*) [VAdd M α] [VAdd Mᵃᵒᵖ α] : Prop where
/-- The right and left actions of `M` on `α` are equal. -/
op_vadd_eq_vadd : ∀ (m : M) (a : α), AddOpposite.op m +ᵥ a = m +ᵥ a
/-- A typeclass indicating that the right (aka `MulOpposite`) and left actions by `M` on `α` are
equal, that is that `M` acts centrally on `α`. This can be thought of as a version of commutativity
for `•`. -/
@[to_additive]
class IsCentralScalar (M α : Type*) [SMul M α] [SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α] : Prop where
/-- The right and left actions of `M` on `α` are equal. -/
op_smul_eq_smul : ∀ (m : M) (a : α), MulOpposite.op m • a = m • a
@[to_additive]
lemma IsCentralScalar.unop_smul_eq_smul {M α : Type*} [SMul M α] [SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α]
[IsCentralScalar M α] (m : Mᵐᵒᵖ) (a : α) : MulOpposite.unop m • a = m • a := by
induction m; exact (IsCentralScalar.op_smul_eq_smul _ a).symm
export IsCentralVAdd (op_vadd_eq_vadd unop_vadd_eq_vadd)
export IsCentralScalar (op_smul_eq_smul unop_smul_eq_smul)
attribute [simp] IsCentralScalar.op_smul_eq_smul
-- these instances are very low priority, as there is usually a faster way to find these instances
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 50) SMulCommClass.op_left [SMul M α] [SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α] [IsCentralScalar M α]
[SMul N α] [SMulCommClass M N α] : SMulCommClass Mᵐᵒᵖ N α :=
⟨fun m n a ↦ by rw [← unop_smul_eq_smul m (n • a), ← unop_smul_eq_smul m a, smul_comm]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 50) SMulCommClass.op_right [SMul M α] [SMul N α] [SMul Nᵐᵒᵖ α]
[IsCentralScalar N α] [SMulCommClass M N α] : SMulCommClass M Nᵐᵒᵖ α :=
⟨fun m n a ↦ by rw [← unop_smul_eq_smul n (m • a), ← unop_smul_eq_smul n a, smul_comm]⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 50) IsScalarTower.op_left [SMul M α] [SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α] [IsCentralScalar M α]
[SMul M N] [SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ N] [IsCentralScalar M N] [SMul N α] [IsScalarTower M N α] :
IsScalarTower Mᵐᵒᵖ N α where
smul_assoc m n a := by rw [← unop_smul_eq_smul m (n • a), ← unop_smul_eq_smul m n, smul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 50) IsScalarTower.op_right [SMul M α] [SMul M N] [SMul N α]
[SMul Nᵐᵒᵖ α] [IsCentralScalar N α] [IsScalarTower M N α] : IsScalarTower M Nᵐᵒᵖ α where
smul_assoc m n a := by
rw [← unop_smul_eq_smul n a, ← unop_smul_eq_smul (m • n) a, MulOpposite.unop_smul, smul_assoc]
namespace SMul
variable [SMul M α]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `SMul.comp`, `MulAction.compHom`,
`DistribMulAction.compHom`, `Module.compHom`, etc. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) " Auxiliary definition for `VAdd.comp`, `AddAction.compHom`, etc. "]
def comp.smul (g : N → M) (n : N) (a : α) : α := g n • a
variable (α)
/-- An action of `M` on `α` and a function `N → M` induces an action of `N` on `α`. -/
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
-- Since this is reducible, we make sure to go via
-- `SMul.comp.smul` to prevent typeclass inference unfolding too far
@[to_additive
"An additive action of `M` on `α` and a function `N → M` induces an additive action of `N` on `α`."]
abbrev comp (g : N → M) : SMul N α where smul := SMul.comp.smul g
variable {α}
/-- Given a tower of scalar actions `M → α → β`, if we use `SMul.comp`
to pull back both of `M`'s actions by a map `g : N → M`, then we obtain a new
tower of scalar actions `N → α → β`.
This cannot be an instance because it can cause infinite loops whenever the `SMul` arguments
are still metavariables. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a tower of additive actions `M → α → β`, if we use `SMul.comp` to pull back both of
`M`'s actions by a map `g : N → M`, then we obtain a new tower of scalar actions `N → α → β`.
This cannot be an instance because it can cause infinite loops whenever the `SMul` arguments
are still metavariables."]
lemma comp.isScalarTower [SMul M β] [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower M α β] (g : N → M) : by
haveI := comp α g; haveI := comp β g; exact IsScalarTower N α β where
__ := comp α g
__ := comp β g
smul_assoc n := smul_assoc (g n)
/-- This cannot be an instance because it can cause infinite loops whenever the `SMul` arguments
are still metavariables. -/
@[to_additive
"This cannot be an instance because it can cause infinite loops whenever the `VAdd` arguments
are still metavariables."]
lemma comp.smulCommClass [SMul β α] [SMulCommClass M β α] (g : N → M) :
haveI := comp α g
SMulCommClass N β α where
__ := comp α g
smul_comm n := smul_comm (g n)
/-- This cannot be an instance because it can cause infinite loops whenever the `SMul` arguments
are still metavariables. -/
@[to_additive
"This cannot be an instance because it can cause infinite loops whenever the `VAdd` arguments
are still metavariables."]
lemma comp.smulCommClass' [SMul β α] [SMulCommClass β M α] (g : N → M) :
haveI := comp α g
SMulCommClass β N α where
__ := comp α g
smul_comm _ n := smul_comm _ (g n)
end SMul
section
/-- Note that the `SMulCommClass α β β` typeclass argument is usually satisfied by `Algebra α β`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_smul_comm [Mul β] [SMul α β] [SMulCommClass α β β] (s : α) (x y : β) :
x * s • y = s • (x * y) := (smul_comm s x y).symm
/-- Note that the `IsScalarTower α β β` typeclass argument is usually satisfied by `Algebra α β`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_mul_assoc [Mul β] [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower α β β] (r : α) (x y : β) :
r • x * y = r • (x * y) := smul_assoc r x y
/-- Note that the `IsScalarTower α β β` typeclass argument is usually satisfied by `Algebra α β`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_div_assoc [DivInvMonoid β] [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower α β β] (r : α) (x y : β) :
r • x / y = r • (x / y) := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, smul_mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_smul_smul_comm [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β δ] [SMul α δ] [SMul γ δ]
[IsScalarTower α β δ] [IsScalarTower α γ δ] [SMulCommClass β γ δ] (a : α) (b : β) (c : γ)
(d : δ) : (a • b) • c • d = (a • c) • b • d := by rw [smul_assoc, smul_assoc, smul_comm b]
/-- Note that the `IsScalarTower α β β` and `SMulCommClass α β β` typeclass arguments are usually
satisfied by `Algebra α β`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_mul_smul_comm [Mul α] [Mul β] [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower α β β]
[IsScalarTower α α β] [SMulCommClass α β β] (a : α) (b : β) (c : α) (d : β) :
(a • b) * (c • d) = (a * c) • (b * d) := by
have : SMulCommClass β α β := .symm ..; exact smul_smul_smul_comm a b c d
@[to_additive]
alias smul_mul_smul := smul_mul_smul_comm
/-- Note that the `IsScalarTower α β β` and `SMulCommClass α β β` typeclass arguments are usually
satisfied by `Algebra α β`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_smul_mul_comm [Mul α] [Mul β] [SMul α β] [IsScalarTower α β β]
[IsScalarTower α α β] [SMulCommClass α β β] (a b : α) (c d : β) :
(a * b) • (c * d) = (a • c) * (b • d) := smul_smul_smul_comm a b c d
variable [SMul M α]
@[to_additive]
lemma Commute.smul_right [Mul α] [SMulCommClass M α α] [IsScalarTower M α α] {a b : α}
(h : Commute a b) (r : M) : Commute a (r • b) :=
(mul_smul_comm _ _ _).trans ((congr_arg _ h).trans <| (smul_mul_assoc _ _ _).symm)
@[to_additive]
lemma Commute.smul_left [Mul α] [SMulCommClass M α α] [IsScalarTower M α α] {a b : α}
(h : Commute a b) (r : M) : Commute (r • a) b := (h.symm.smul_right r).symm
end
section
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M α] {a : M}
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_smul (a₁ a₂ : M) (b : α) : a₁ • a₂ • b = (a₁ * a₂) • b := (mul_smul _ _ _).symm
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma one_smul (b : α) : (1 : M) • b = b := MulAction.one_smul _
/-- `SMul` version of `one_mul_eq_id` -/
@[to_additive "`VAdd` version of `zero_add_eq_id`"]
lemma one_smul_eq_id : (((1 : M) • ·) : α → α) = id := funext <| one_smul _
/-- `SMul` version of `comp_mul_left` -/
@[to_additive "`VAdd` version of `comp_add_left`"]
lemma comp_smul_left (a₁ a₂ : M) : (a₁ • ·) ∘ (a₂ • ·) = (((a₁ * a₂) • ·) : α → α) :=
funext fun _ ↦ (mul_smul _ _ _).symm
variable {M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a • · : α → α)^[n] = (a ^ n • ·)
| 0 => by simp [funext_iff]
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [smul_iterate, pow_succ, smul_smul]
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_iterate_apply (a : M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : (a • ·)^[n] x = a ^ n • x := by
rw [smul_iterate]
/-- Pullback a multiplicative action along an injective map respecting `•`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[to_additive
"Pullback an additive action along an injective map respecting `+ᵥ`."]
protected abbrev Function.Injective.mulAction [SMul M β] (f : β → α) (hf : Injective f)
(smul : ∀ (c : M) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : MulAction M β where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul x := hf <| (smul _ _).trans <| one_smul _ (f x)
mul_smul c₁ c₂ x := hf <| by simp only [smul, mul_smul]
/-- Pushforward a multiplicative action along a surjective map respecting `•`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[to_additive
"Pushforward an additive action along a surjective map respecting `+ᵥ`."]
protected abbrev Function.Surjective.mulAction [SMul M β] (f : α → β) (hf : Surjective f)
(smul : ∀ (c : M) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : MulAction M β where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := by simp [hf.forall, ← smul]
mul_smul := by simp [hf.forall, ← smul, mul_smul]
section
variable (M)
/-- The regular action of a monoid on itself by left multiplication.
This is promoted to a module by `Semiring.toModule`. -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive
"The regular action of a monoid on itself by left addition.
This is promoted to an `AddTorsor` by `addGroup_is_addTorsor`."]
instance (priority := 910) Monoid.toMulAction : MulAction M M where
smul := (· * ·)
one_smul := one_mul
mul_smul := mul_assoc
@[to_additive]
instance IsScalarTower.left : IsScalarTower M M α where
smul_assoc x y z := mul_smul x y z
variable {M}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid N] [MulAction M N] [IsScalarTower M N N] [SMulCommClass M N N]
lemma smul_pow (r : M) (x : N) : ∀ n, (r • x) ^ n = r ^ n • x ^ n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', smul_pow _ _ n, smul_mul_smul_comm, ← pow_succ', ← pow_succ']
end Monoid
section Group
variable [Group G] [MulAction G α] {g : G} {a b : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_smul_smul (g : G) (a : α) : g⁻¹ • g • a = a := by rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_inv_smul (g : G) (a : α) : g • g⁻¹ • a = a := by rw [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel, one_smul]
@[to_additive] lemma inv_smul_eq_iff : g⁻¹ • a = b ↔ a = g • b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, smul_inv_smul], fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_smul_smul]⟩
@[to_additive] lemma eq_inv_smul_iff : a = g⁻¹ • b ↔ g • a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, smul_inv_smul], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_smul_smul]⟩
section Mul
variable [Mul H] [MulAction G H] [SMulCommClass G H H] [IsScalarTower G H H] {a b : H}
@[simp] lemma Commute.smul_right_iff : Commute a (g • b) ↔ Commute a b :=
⟨fun h ↦ inv_smul_smul g b ▸ h.smul_right g⁻¹, fun h ↦ h.smul_right g⟩
@[simp] lemma Commute.smul_left_iff : Commute (g • a) b ↔ Commute a b := by
rw [Commute.symm_iff, Commute.smul_right_iff, Commute.symm_iff]
end Mul
variable [Group H] [MulAction G H] [SMulCommClass G H H] [IsScalarTower G H H]
lemma smul_inv (g : G) (a : H) : (g • a)⁻¹ = g⁻¹ • a⁻¹ :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rw [smul_mul_smul_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_inv_cancel, one_smul]
lemma smul_zpow (g : G) (a : H) (n : ℤ) : (g • a) ^ n = g ^ n • a ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp [smul_pow, smul_inv]
end Group
end
lemma SMulCommClass.of_commMonoid
(A B G : Type*) [CommMonoid G] [SMul A G] [SMul B G]
[IsScalarTower A G G] [IsScalarTower B G G] :
SMulCommClass A B G where
smul_comm r s x := by
rw [← one_smul G (s • x), ← smul_assoc, ← one_smul G x, ← smul_assoc s 1 x,
smul_comm, smul_assoc, one_smul, smul_assoc, one_smul]
end
section CompatibleScalar
@[to_additive]
lemma smul_one_smul {M} (N) [Monoid N] [SMul M N] [MulAction N α] [SMul M α]
[IsScalarTower M N α] (x : M) (y : α) : (x • (1 : N)) • y = x • y := by
rw [smul_assoc, one_smul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_one_mul {M N} [MulOneClass N] [SMul M N] [IsScalarTower M N N] (x : M) (y : N) :
x • (1 : N) * y = x • y := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_smul_one {M N} [MulOneClass N] [SMul M N] [SMulCommClass M N N] (x : M) (y : N) :
y * x • (1 : N) = x • y := by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_comm, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsScalarTower.of_smul_one_mul {M N} [Monoid N] [SMul M N]
(h : ∀ (x : M) (y : N), x • (1 : N) * y = x • y) : IsScalarTower M N N :=
⟨fun x y z ↦ by rw [← h, smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc, h, smul_eq_mul]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma SMulCommClass.of_mul_smul_one {M N} [Monoid N] [SMul M N]
(H : ∀ (x : M) (y : N), y * x • (1 : N) = x • y) : SMulCommClass M N N :=
⟨fun x y z ↦ by rw [← H x z, smul_eq_mul, ← H, smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]⟩
end CompatibleScalar
/-- Typeclass for multiplicative actions on multiplicative structures. This generalizes
conjugation actions. -/
@[ext]
class MulDistribMulAction (M N : Type*) [Monoid M] [Monoid N] extends MulAction M N where
/-- Distributivity of `•` across `*` -/
smul_mul : ∀ (r : M) (x y : N), r • (x * y) = r • x * r • y
/-- Multiplying `1` by a scalar gives `1` -/
smul_one : ∀ r : M, r • (1 : N) = 1
export MulDistribMulAction (smul_one)
section MulDistribMulAction
variable [Monoid M] [Monoid N] [MulDistribMulAction M N]
lemma smul_mul' (a : M) (b₁ b₂ : N) : a • (b₁ * b₂) = a • b₁ * a • b₂ :=
MulDistribMulAction.smul_mul ..
end MulDistribMulAction
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Action/Defs.lean | 537 | 542 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 2,544 | 2,548 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
/-!
# Ring-theoretic supplement of Algebra.Polynomial.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.isDomain`:
If a ring is an integral domain, then so is its polynomial ring over finitely many variables.
* `Polynomial.isNoetherianRing`:
Hilbert basis theorem, that if a ring is noetherian then so is its polynomial ring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree < `n`. -/
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
/-- The first `n` coefficients on `degreeLT n` form a linear equivalence with `Fin n → R`. -/
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
/-- The equivalence between monic polynomials of degree `n` and polynomials of degree less than
`n`, formed by adding a term `X ^ n`. -/
def monicEquivDegreeLT [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
{ p : R[X] // p.Monic ∧ p.natDegree = n } ≃ degreeLT R n where
toFun p := ⟨p.1.eraseLead, by
rcases p with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_degreeLT]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ degree_le_natDegree
exact degree_eraseLead_lt (ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic one_ne_zero hp)⟩
invFun := fun p =>
⟨X^n + p.1, monic_X_pow_add (mem_degreeLT.1 p.2), by
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 p.2]⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
ext1
simp only
conv_rhs => rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow p]
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, add_comm]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only
rw [eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 hp]
/-- For every polynomial `p` in the span of a set `s : Set R[X]`, there exists a polynomial of
`p' ∈ s` with higher degree. See also `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
/-- A stronger version of `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span` under the assumption that the
set `s : R[X]` is finite. There exists a polynomial `p' ∈ s` whose degree dominates the degree of
every element of `p ∈ span R s`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLE n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLT n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
/-- If `R` is a nontrivial ring, the polynomials `R[X]` are not finite as an `R`-module. When `R` is
a field, this is equivalent to `R[X]` being an infinite-dimensional vector space over `R`. -/
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
theorem geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).comp (X + 1) =
(Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ => (n.choose (i + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ i := by
ext i
trans (n.choose (i + 1) : R); swap
· simp only [finset_sum_coeff, ← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, if_pos rfl]
· simp +contextual only [@eq_comm _ i, if_false, eq_self_iff_true,
imp_true_iff]
· simp +contextual only [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt,
Nat.cast_zero, Finset.mem_range, not_lt, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, imp_true_iff]
induction' n with n ih generalizing i
· dsimp; simp only [zero_comp, coeff_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', ih, add_comp, X_pow_comp, coeff_add, Nat.choose_succ_succ,
Nat.cast_add, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
theorem Monic.geom_sum {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.natDegree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn
rw [geom_sum_succ']
refine (hP.pow _).add_of_left ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· simp only [Finset.mem_range, degree_eq_natDegree (hP.pow _).ne_zero]
simp only [Nat.cast_lt, hP.natDegree_pow]
intro k
exact nsmul_lt_nsmul_left hdeg
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot]
exact (hP.pow _).ne_zero
theorem Monic.geom_sum' {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic :=
hP.geom_sum (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg) hn
theorem monic_geom_sum_X {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
apply monic_X.geom_sum _ hn
simp only [natDegree_X, zero_lt_one]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Given a polynomial, return the polynomial whose coefficients are in
the ring closure of the original coefficients. -/
def restriction (p : R[X]) : Polynomial (Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R)) :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ (Subring.closure _).zero_mem
else Subring.subset_closure (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ :
Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R))
@[simp]
theorem coeff_restriction {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (restriction p) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [restriction, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_restriction' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (coeff (restriction p) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_restriction (p : R[X]) : support (restriction p) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_restriction]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_restriction {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
p.restriction.map (algebraMap _ _) = p :=
ext fun n => by rw [coeff_map, Algebra.algebraMap_ofSubring_apply, coeff_restriction]
@[simp]
theorem degree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_restriction {p : R[X]} : Monic (restriction p) ↔ Monic p := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_restriction]
rw [← @coeff_restriction _ _ p]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem restriction_zero : restriction (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [restriction, Finset.sum_empty, support_zero]
@[simp]
theorem restriction_one : restriction (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by rw [coeff_restriction', coeff_one, coeff_one]; split_ifs <;> rfl
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} {x : S}
theorem eval₂_restriction {p : R[X]} :
eval₂ f x p =
eval₂ (f.comp (Subring.subtype (Subring.closure (p.coeffs : Set R)))) x p.restriction := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, support_restriction, ← @coeff_restriction _ _ p, RingHom.comp_apply,
Subring.coe_subtype]
section ToSubring
variable (p : R[X]) (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial `p` and a subring `T` that contains the coefficients of `p`,
return the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in `T`. -/
def toSubring (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T) : T[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ T.zero_mem else hp (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ : T)
variable (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_toSubring {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (toSubring p T hp) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [toSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_toSubring' {n : ℕ} : (coeff (toSubring p T hp) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_toSubring : support (toSubring p T hp) = support p := by
| ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 398 | 399 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
lemma nontrivial_iff {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (ZMod n) ↔ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial, subsingleton_iff]
-- todo: this can be made a `Unique` instance.
instance subsingleton_units : Subsingleton (ZMod 2)ˣ :=
⟨by decide⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} :
a + a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Nat.odd_iff, ← Nat.two_dvd_ne_zero, ← Nat.prime_two.coprime_iff_not_dvd] at hn
rw [← mul_two, ← @Nat.cast_two (ZMod n), ← ZMod.coe_unitOfCoprime 2 hn, Units.mul_left_eq_zero]
theorem ne_neg_self {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) {a : ZMod n} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ≠ -a := by
rwa [Ne, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_self_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero hn]
theorem neg_one_ne_one {n : ℕ} [Fact (2 < n)] : (-1 : ZMod n) ≠ 1 :=
CharP.neg_one_ne_one (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_mod_two (a : ZMod 2) : -a = a := by
fin_cases a <;> apply Fin.ext <;> simp [Fin.coe_neg, Int.natMod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem natAbs_mod_two (a : ℤ) : (a.natAbs : ZMod 2) = a := by
cases a
· simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, Int.ofNat_eq_coe]
· simp only [neg_eq_self_mod_two, Nat.cast_succ, Int.natAbs, Int.cast_negSucc]
theorem val_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
(val_eq_zero a).not
theorem val_pos {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} : 0 < a.val ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem val_eq_one : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : 1 < n) (a : ZMod n), a.val = 1 ↔ a = 1
| 0, hn, _
| 1, hn, _ => by simp at hn
| n + 2, _, _ => by simp only [val, ZMod, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_one]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 ∨ 2 * a.val = n := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero, ← two_mul]
cases n
· rw [@mul_eq_zero ℤ, @mul_eq_zero ℕ, val_eq_zero]
exact
⟨fun h => h.elim (by simp) Or.inl, fun h =>
Or.inr (h.elim id fun h => h.elim (by simp) id)⟩
conv_lhs =>
rw [← a.natCast_zmod_val, ← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_mul, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨m, he⟩
rcases m with - | m
· rw [mul_zero, mul_eq_zero] at he
rcases he with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | he)
exact Or.inl (a.val_eq_zero.1 he)
cases m
· right
rwa [show 0 + 1 = 1 from rfl, mul_one] at he
refine (a.val_lt.not_le <| Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ zero_lt_two).elim
rw [he, mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
simp
· rintro (rfl | h)
· rw [val_zero, mul_zero]
apply dvd_zero
· rw [h]
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_cast_zmod_lt {m : ℕ} [NeZero m] (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ZMod m) :
(a.cast : ZMod n).val < m := by
rcases m with (⟨⟩|⟨m⟩); · cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
by_cases h : m < n
· rcases n with (⟨⟩|⟨n⟩); · simp at h
rw [← natCast_val, val_cast_of_lt]
· apply a.val_lt
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (ZMod.val_lt a)) h
· rw [not_lt] at h
apply lt_of_lt_of_le (ZMod.val_lt _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_succ m))
theorem neg_val' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = (n - a.val) % n :=
calc
(-a).val = val (-a) % n := by rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (-a).val_lt]
_ = (n - val a) % n :=
Nat.ModEq.add_right_cancel' (val a)
(by
rw [Nat.ModEq, ← val_add, neg_add_cancel, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a.val_le, Nat.mod_self,
val_zero])
theorem neg_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (-a).val = if a = 0 then 0 else n - a.val := by
rw [neg_val']
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [if_pos h, h, val_zero, tsub_zero, Nat.mod_self]
rw [if_neg h]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
apply Nat.sub_lt (NeZero.pos n)
contrapose! h
rwa [Nat.le_zero, val_eq_zero] at h
theorem val_neg_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [nz : NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) [na : NeZero a] :
(- a).val = n - a.val := by simp_all [neg_val a, na.out]
theorem val_sub {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : b.val ≤ a.val) :
(a - b).val = a.val - b.val := by
by_cases hb : b = 0
· cases hb; simp
· have : NeZero b := ⟨hb⟩
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, val_add, val_neg_of_ne_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc (le_of_lt (val_lt _)),
add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.add_mod_left]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (tsub_lt_of_lt (val_lt _))
theorem val_cast_eq_val_of_lt {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] {a : ZMod m}
(h : a.val < n) : (a.cast : ZMod n).val = a.val := by
have nzn : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => cases nzn; simp_all
| succ n => exact Fin.val_cast_of_lt h
theorem cast_cast_zmod_of_le {m n : ℕ} [hm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast (cast a : ZMod n) : ZMod m) = a := by
have : NeZero n := ⟨((Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hm.out).trans_le h).ne'⟩
rw [cast_eq_val, val_cast_eq_val_of_lt (a.val_lt.trans_le h), natCast_zmod_val]
theorem val_pow {m n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} [ilt : Fact (1 < n)] (h : a.val ^ m < n) :
(a ^ m).val = a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
have : a.val ^ m < n := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· by_cases hm : m = 0
· cases hm; simp [ilt.out]
· simp only [val_zero, ne_eq, hm, not_false_eq_true, zero_pow, Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h]
· exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by rwa [gt_iff_lt, ZMod.val_pos]) (Nat.le_succ m)) h
rw [pow_succ, ZMod.val_mul, ih this, ← pow_succ, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_pow_le {m n : ℕ} [Fact (1 < n)] {a : ZMod n} : (a ^ m).val ≤ a.val ^ m := by
induction m with
| zero => simp [ZMod.val_one]
| succ m ih =>
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
apply le_trans (ZMod.val_mul_le _ _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ ih
theorem natAbs_min_of_le_div_two (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) (he : (x : ZMod n) = y) (hl : x.natAbs ≤ n / 2) :
x.natAbs ≤ y.natAbs := by
rw [intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub] at he
obtain ⟨m, he⟩ := he
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at he
subst he
obtain rfl | hm := eq_or_ne m 0
· rw [mul_zero, zero_add]
apply hl.trans
rw [← add_le_add_iff_right x.natAbs]
refine le_trans (le_trans ((add_le_add_iff_left _).2 hl) ?_) (Int.natAbs_sub_le _ _)
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_natCast]
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| Int.natAbs_pos.2 hm)
rw [← mul_two]; apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
end ZMod
theorem RingHom.ext_zmod {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R] (f g : ZMod n →+* R) : f = g := by
ext a
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective a
let φ : ℤ →+* R := f.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
let ψ : ℤ →+* R := g.comp (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n))
show φ k = ψ k
rw [φ.ext_int ψ]
namespace ZMod
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
instance subsingleton_ringHom [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n →+* R) :=
⟨RingHom.ext_zmod⟩
instance subsingleton_ringEquiv [Semiring R] : Subsingleton (ZMod n ≃+* R) :=
⟨fun f g => by
rw [RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_inj_iff]
apply RingHom.ext_zmod _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem ringHom_map_cast [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) (k : ZMod n) : f (cast k) = k := by
cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast] at f k ⊢; simp
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [map_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` has a right inverse. -/
theorem ringHom_rightInverse [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) :
Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → R) f :=
ringHom_map_cast f
/-- Any ring homomorphism into `ZMod n` is surjective. -/
theorem ringHom_surjective [NonAssocRing R] (f : R →+* ZMod n) : Function.Surjective f :=
(ringHom_rightInverse f).surjective
@[simp]
lemma castHom_self : ZMod.castHom dvd_rfl (ZMod n) = RingHom.id (ZMod n) :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp]
lemma castHom_comp {m d : ℕ} (hm : n ∣ m) (hd : m ∣ d) :
(castHom hm (ZMod n)).comp (castHom hd (ZMod m)) = castHom (dvd_trans hm hd) (ZMod n) :=
RingHom.ext_zmod _ _
section lift
variable (n) {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
/-- The map from `ZMod n` induced by `f : ℤ →+ A` that maps `n` to `0`. -/
def lift : { f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0 } ≃ (ZMod n →+ A) :=
(Equiv.subtypeEquivRight <| by
intro f
rw [ker_intCastAddHom]
constructor
· rintro hf _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [f.map_zsmul, zsmul_zero, f.mem_ker, hf]
· intro h
exact h (AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples _)).trans <|
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).liftOfRightInverse cast intCast_zmod_cast
variable (f : { f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0 })
@[simp]
theorem lift_coe (x : ℤ) : lift n f (x : ZMod n) = f.val x :=
AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ (fun _ => intCast_zmod_cast _) _ _
theorem lift_castAddHom (x : ℤ) : lift n f (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n) x) = f.1 x :=
AddMonoidHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ (fun _ => intCast_zmod_cast _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_coe : ZMod.lift n f ∘ ((↑) : ℤ → _) = f :=
funext <| lift_coe _ _
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_castAddHom : (ZMod.lift n f).comp (Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)) = f :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <| lift_castAddHom _ _
lemma lift_injective {f : {f : ℤ →+ A // f n = 0}} :
Injective (lift n f) ↔ ∀ m, f.1 m = 0 → (m : ZMod n) = 0 := by
simp only [← AddMonoidHom.ker_eq_bot_iff, eq_bot_iff, SetLike.le_def,
ZMod.intCast_surjective.forall, ZMod.lift_coe, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, AddSubgroup.mem_bot]
end lift
end ZMod
/-!
### Groups of bounded torsion
For `G` a group and `n` a natural number, `G` having torsion dividing `n`
(`∀ x : G, n • x = 0`) can be derived from `Module R G` where `R` has characteristic dividing `n`.
It is however painful to have the API for such groups `G` stated in this generality, as `R` does not
appear anywhere in the lemmas' return type. Instead of writing the API in terms of a general `R`, we
therefore specialise to the canonical ring of order `n`, namely `ZMod n`.
This spelling `Module (ZMod n) G` has the extra advantage of providing the canonical action by
`ZMod n`. It is however Type-valued, so we might want to acquire a Prop-valued version in the
future.
-/
section Module
variable {n : ℕ} {S G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [AddSubgroupClass S G] {K : S} {x : G}
section general
variable [Module (ZMod n) G] {x : G}
lemma zmod_smul_mem (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ a : ZMod n, a • x ∈ K := by
simpa [ZMod.forall, Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul] using zsmul_mem hx
/-- This cannot be made an instance because of the `[Module (ZMod n) G]` argument and the fact that
`n` only appears in the second argument of `SMulMemClass`, which is an `OutParam`. -/
lemma smulMemClass : SMulMemClass S (ZMod n) G where smul_mem _ _ {_x} hx := zmod_smul_mem hx _
namespace AddSubgroupClass
instance instZModSMul : SMul (ZMod n) K where smul a x := ⟨a • x, zmod_smul_mem x.2 _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zmod_smul (a : ZMod n) (x : K) : ↑(a • x) = (a • x : G) := rfl
instance instZModModule : Module (ZMod n) K :=
Subtype.coe_injective.module _ (AddSubmonoidClass.subtype K) coe_zmod_smul
end AddSubgroupClass
|
variable (n)
lemma ZModModule.char_nsmul_eq_zero (x : G) : n • x = 0 := by
simp [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul (ZMod n)]
variable (G) in
lemma ZModModule.char_ne_one [Nontrivial G] : n ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 1,186 | 1,194 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.W.Basic
/-!
# Polynomial functors
This file defines polynomial functors and the W-type construction as a
polynomial functor. (For the M-type construction, see
pfunctor/M.lean.)
-/
-- "W", "Idx"
universe u v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- A polynomial functor `P` is given by a type `A` and a family `B` of types over `A`. `P` maps
any type `α` to a new type `P α`, which is defined as the sigma type `Σ x, P.B x → α`.
An element of `P α` is a pair `⟨a, f⟩`, where `a` is an element of a type `A` and
`f : B a → α`. Think of `a` as the shape of the object and `f` as an index to the relevant
elements of `α`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
structure PFunctor where
/-- The head type -/
A : Type u
/-- The child family of types -/
B : A → Type u
namespace PFunctor
instance : Inhabited PFunctor :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
variable (P : PFunctor.{u}) {α : Type v₁} {β : Type v₂} {γ : Type v₃}
/-- Applying `P` to an object of `Type` -/
@[coe]
def Obj (α : Type v) :=
Σ x : P.A, P.B x → α
instance : CoeFun PFunctor.{u} (fun _ => Type v → Type (max u v)) where
coe := Obj
/-- Applying `P` to a morphism of `Type` -/
def map (f : α → β) : P α → P β :=
fun ⟨a, g⟩ => ⟨a, f ∘ g⟩
instance Obj.inhabited [Inhabited P.A] [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (P α) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
instance : Functor.{v, max u v} P.Obj where map := @map P
/-- We prefer `PFunctor.map` to `Functor.map` because it is universe-polymorphic. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β : Type v} (f : α → β) (x : P α) : f <$> x = P.map f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq (f : α → β) (a : P.A) (g : P.B a → α) :
P.map f ⟨a, g⟩ = ⟨a, f ∘ g⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem id_map : ∀ x : P α, P.map id x = x := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
∀ x : P α, P.map g (P.map f x) = P.map (g ∘ f) x := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
instance : LawfulFunctor.{v, max u v} P.Obj where
map_const := rfl
id_map x := P.id_map x
comp_map f g x := P.map_map f g x |>.symm
/-- re-export existing definition of W-types and
adapt it to a packaged definition of polynomial functor -/
def W :=
WType P.B
/- inhabitants of W types is awkward to encode as an instance
assumption because there needs to be a value `a : P.A`
such that `P.B a` is empty to yield a finite tree -/
variable {P}
/-- root element of a W tree -/
def W.head : W P → P.A
| ⟨a, _f⟩ => a
/-- children of the root of a W tree -/
def W.children : ∀ x : W P, P.B (W.head x) → W P
| ⟨_a, f⟩ => f
/-- destructor for W-types -/
def W.dest : W P → P (W P)
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
/-- constructor for W-types -/
def W.mk : P (W P) → W P
| ⟨a, f⟩ => ⟨a, f⟩
@[simp]
theorem W.dest_mk (p : P (W P)) : W.dest (W.mk p) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[simp]
theorem W.mk_dest (p : W P) : W.mk (W.dest p) = p := by cases p; rfl
variable (P)
/-- `Idx` identifies a location inside the application of a pfunctor.
For `F : PFunctor`, `x : F α` and `i : F.Idx`, `i` can designate
one part of `x` or is invalid, if `i.1 ≠ x.1` -/
def Idx :=
Σ x : P.A, P.B x
instance Idx.inhabited [Inhabited P.A] [Inhabited (P.B default)] : Inhabited P.Idx :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
variable {P}
/-- `x.iget i` takes the component of `x` designated by `i` if any is or returns
a default value -/
def Obj.iget [DecidableEq P.A] {α} [Inhabited α] (x : P α) (i : P.Idx) : α :=
| if h : i.1 = x.1 then x.2 (cast (congr_arg _ h) i.2) else default
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/Basic.lean | 129 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.GammaSpecAdjunction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Radical
/-!
# Proj as a scheme
This file is to prove that `Proj` is a scheme.
## Notation
* `Proj` : `Proj` as a locally ringed space
* `Proj.T` : the underlying topological space of `Proj`
* `Proj| U` : `Proj` restricted to some open set `U`
* `Proj.T| U` : the underlying topological space of `Proj` restricted to open set `U`
* `pbo f` : basic open set at `f` in `Proj`
* `Spec` : `Spec` as a locally ringed space
* `Spec.T` : the underlying topological space of `Spec`
* `sbo g` : basic open set at `g` in `Spec`
* `A⁰_x` : the degree zero part of localized ring `Aₓ`
## Implementation
In `AlgebraicGeometry/ProjectiveSpectrum/StructureSheaf.lean`, we have given `Proj` a
structure sheaf so that `Proj` is a locally ringed space. In this file we will prove that `Proj`
equipped with this structure sheaf is a scheme. We achieve this by using an affine cover by basic
open sets in `Proj`, more specifically:
1. We prove that `Proj` can be covered by basic open sets at homogeneous element of positive degree.
2. We prove that for any homogeneous element `f : A` of positive degree `m`, `Proj.T | (pbo f)` is
homeomorphic to `Spec.T A⁰_f`:
- forward direction `toSpec`:
for any `x : pbo f`, i.e. a relevant homogeneous prime ideal `x`, send it to
`A⁰_f ∩ span {g / 1 | g ∈ x}` (see `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.IoSpec.carrier`). This ideal is
prime, the proof is in `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.ToSpec.toFun`. The fact that this function
is continuous is found in `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.toSpec`
- backward direction `fromSpec`:
for any `q : Spec A⁰_f`, we send it to `{a | ∀ i, aᵢᵐ/fⁱ ∈ q}`; we need this to be a
homogeneous prime ideal that is relevant.
* This is in fact an ideal, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.asIdeal`;
* This ideal is also homogeneous, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.asIdeal.homogeneous`;
* This ideal is relevant, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.relevant`;
* This ideal is prime, the proof can be found in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.carrier.asIdeal.prime`.
Hence we have a well defined function `Spec.T A⁰_f → Proj.T | (pbo f)`, this function is called
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.FromSpec.toFun`. But to prove the continuity of this function, we need
to prove `fromSpec ∘ toSpec` and `toSpec ∘ fromSpec` are both identities; these are achieved in
`ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.fromSpec_toSpec` and `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.toSpec_fromSpec`.
3. Then we construct a morphism of locally ringed spaces `α : Proj| (pbo f) ⟶ Spec.T A⁰_f` as the
following: by the Gamma-Spec adjunction, it is sufficient to construct a ring map
`A⁰_f → Γ(Proj, pbo f)` from the ring of homogeneous localization of `A` away from `f` to the
local sections of structure sheaf of projective spectrum on the basic open set around `f`.
The map `A⁰_f → Γ(Proj, pbo f)` is constructed in `awayToΓ` and is defined by sending
`s ∈ A⁰_f` to the section `x ↦ s` on `pbo f`.
## Main Definitions and Statements
For a homogeneous element `f` of degree `m`
* `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.toSpec`: the continuous map between `Proj.T| pbo f` and `Spec.T A⁰_f`
defined by sending `x : Proj| (pbo f)` to `A⁰_f ∩ span {g / 1 | g ∈ x}`. We also denote this map
as `ψ`.
* `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.ToSpec.preimage_eq`: for any `a: A`, if `a/f^m` has degree zero,
then the preimage of `sbo a/f^m` under `toSpec f` is `pbo f ∩ pbo a`.
If we further assume `m` is positive
* `ProjIsoSpecTopComponent.fromSpec`: the continuous map between `Spec.T A⁰_f` and `Proj.T| pbo f`
defined by sending `q` to `{a | aᵢᵐ/fⁱ ∈ q}` where `aᵢ` is the `i`-th coordinate of `a`.
We also denote this map as `φ`
* `projIsoSpecTopComponent`: the homeomorphism `Proj.T| pbo f ≅ Spec.T A⁰_f` obtained by `φ` and
`ψ`.
* `ProjectiveSpectrum.Proj.toSpec`: the morphism of locally ringed spaces between `Proj| pbo f`
and `Spec A⁰_f` corresponding to the ring map `A⁰_f → Γ(Proj, pbo f)` under the Gamma-Spec
adjunction defined by sending `s` to the section `x ↦ s` on `pbo f`.
Finally,
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Proj`: for any `ℕ`-graded ring `A`, `Proj A` is locally affine, hence is a
scheme.
## Reference
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]: Chapter II.2 Proposition 2.5
-/
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open scoped DirectSum Pointwise
open DirectSum SetLike.GradedMonoid Localization
open Finset hiding mk_zero
variable {R A : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable (𝒜 : ℕ → Submodule R A)
variable [GradedAlgebra 𝒜]
open TopCat TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory Opposite
open ProjectiveSpectrum.StructureSheaf
-- Porting note: currently require lack of hygiene to use in variable declarations
-- maybe all make into notation3?
set_option hygiene false
/-- `Proj` as a locally ringed space -/
local notation3 "Proj" => Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace 𝒜
/-- The underlying topological space of `Proj` -/
local notation3 "Proj.T" => PresheafedSpace.carrier <| SheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace
<| LocallyRingedSpace.toSheafedSpace <| Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace 𝒜
/-- `Proj` restrict to some open set -/
macro "Proj| " U:term : term =>
`((Proj.toLocallyRingedSpace 𝒜).restrict
(Opens.isOpenEmbedding (X := Proj.T) ($U : Opens Proj.T)))
/-- the underlying topological space of `Proj` restricted to some open set -/
local notation "Proj.T| " U => PresheafedSpace.carrier <| SheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace
<| LocallyRingedSpace.toSheafedSpace
<| (LocallyRingedSpace.restrict Proj (Opens.isOpenEmbedding (X := Proj.T) (U : Opens Proj.T)))
/-- basic open sets in `Proj` -/
local notation "pbo " x => ProjectiveSpectrum.basicOpen 𝒜 x
/-- basic open sets in `Spec` -/
local notation "sbo " f => PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f
/-- `Spec` as a locally ringed space -/
local notation3 "Spec " ring => Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (CommRingCat.of ring)
/-- the underlying topological space of `Spec` -/
local notation "Spec.T " ring =>
(Spec.locallyRingedSpaceObj (CommRingCat.of ring)).toSheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace.1
local notation3 "A⁰_ " f => HomogeneousLocalization.Away 𝒜 f
namespace ProjIsoSpecTopComponent
/-
This section is to construct the homeomorphism between `Proj` restricted at basic open set at
a homogeneous element `x` and `Spec A⁰ₓ` where `A⁰ₓ` is the degree zero part of the localized
ring `Aₓ`.
-/
namespace ToSpec
open Ideal
-- This section is to construct the forward direction :
-- So for any `x` in `Proj| (pbo f)`, we need some point in `Spec A⁰_f`, i.e. a prime ideal,
-- and we need this correspondence to be continuous in their Zariski topology.
variable {𝒜}
variable {f : A} {m : ℕ} (x : Proj| (pbo f))
/--
For any `x` in `Proj| (pbo f)`, the corresponding ideal in `Spec A⁰_f`. This fact that this ideal
is prime is proven in `TopComponent.Forward.toFun`. -/
def carrier : Ideal (A⁰_ f) :=
Ideal.comap (algebraMap (A⁰_ f) (Away f))
(x.val.asHomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal.map (algebraMap A (Away f)))
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_carrier (z : HomogeneousLocalization.NumDenSameDeg 𝒜 (.powers f)) :
HomogeneousLocalization.mk z ∈ carrier x ↔ z.num.1 ∈ x.1.asHomogeneousIdeal := by
rw [carrier, Ideal.mem_comap, HomogeneousLocalization.algebraMap_apply,
HomogeneousLocalization.val_mk, Localization.mk_eq_mk', IsLocalization.mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one,
mul_comm, Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem, ← Ideal.mem_comap,
IsLocalization.comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint (.powers f)]
· rfl
· infer_instance
· exact (disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem _ (Ideal.IsPrime.isRadical inferInstance)).mpr x.2
· exact isUnit_of_invertible _
theorem isPrime_carrier : Ideal.IsPrime (carrier x) := by
refine Ideal.IsPrime.comap _ (hK := ?_)
exact IsLocalization.isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint
(Submonoid.powers f) _ _ inferInstance
| ((disjoint_powers_iff_not_mem _ (Ideal.IsPrime.isRadical inferInstance)).mpr x.2)
variable (f)
/-- The function between the basic open set `D(f)` in `Proj` to the corresponding basic open set in
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/ProjectiveSpectrum/Scheme.lean | 188 | 192 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.AddChar
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# The Fourier transform
We set up the Fourier transform for complex-valued functions on finite-dimensional spaces.
## Design choices
In namespace `VectorFourier`, we define the Fourier integral in the following context:
* `𝕜` is a commutative ring.
* `V` and `W` are `𝕜`-modules.
* `e` is a unitary additive character of `𝕜`, i.e. an `AddChar 𝕜 Circle`.
* `μ` is a measure on `V`.
* `L` is a `𝕜`-bilinear form `V × W → 𝕜`.
* `E` is a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space.
With these definitions, we define `fourierIntegral` to be the map from functions `V → E` to
functions `W → E` that sends `f` to
`fun w ↦ ∫ v in V, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ`,
This includes the cases `W` is the dual of `V` and `L` is the canonical pairing, or `W = V` and `L`
is a bilinear form (e.g. an inner product).
In namespace `Fourier`, we consider the more familiar special case when `V = W = 𝕜` and `L` is the
multiplication map (but still allowing `𝕜` to be an arbitrary ring equipped with a measure).
The most familiar case of all is when `V = W = 𝕜 = ℝ`, `L` is multiplication, `μ` is volume, and
`e` is `Real.fourierChar`, i.e. the character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we
introduced the notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`).
Another familiar case (which generalizes the previous one) is when `V = W` is an inner product space
over `ℝ` and `L` is the scalar product. We introduce two notations `𝓕` for the Fourier transform in
this case and `𝓕⁻ f (v) = 𝓕 f (-v)` for the inverse Fourier transform. These notations make
in particular sense for `V = W = ℝ`.
## Main results
At present the only nontrivial lemma we prove is `fourierIntegral_continuous`, stating that the
Fourier transform of an integrable function is continuous (under mild assumptions).
-/
noncomputable section
local notation "𝕊" => Circle
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology
/-! ## Fourier theory for functions on general vector spaces -/
namespace VectorFourier
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [MeasurableSpace V]
{W : Type*} [AddCommGroup W] [Module 𝕜 W]
{E F G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℂ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℂ G]
section Defs
/-- The Fourier transform integral for `f : V → E`, with respect to a bilinear form `L : V × W → 𝕜`
and an additive character `e`. -/
def fourierIntegral (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V) (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E)
(w : W) : E :=
∫ v, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ
theorem fourierIntegral_const_smul (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (r : ℂ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (r • f) = r • fourierIntegral e μ L f := by
ext1 w
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, fourierIntegral, smul_comm _ r, integral_smul]
/-- The uniform norm of the Fourier integral of `f` is bounded by the `L¹` norm of `f`. -/
theorem norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
‖fourierIntegral e μ L f w‖ ≤ ∫ v : V, ‖f v‖ ∂μ := by
refine (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
simp_rw [Circle.norm_smul]
/-- The Fourier integral converts right-translation into scalar multiplication by a phase factor. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_comp_add_right [MeasurableAdd V] (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
| [μ.IsAddRightInvariant] (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (v₀ : V) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (f ∘ fun v ↦ v + v₀) =
fun w ↦ e (L v₀ w) • fourierIntegral e μ L f w := by
ext1 w
dsimp only [fourierIntegral, Function.comp_apply, Circle.smul_def]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransform.lean | 96 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
exact mod_cast Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [pow_add, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_sum]
gcongr
simp_rw [← div_pow]
rw [geom_sum_eq, div_le_iff_of_neg]
· trans (-1 : ℝ)
· linarith
· simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, div_pow, Nat.cast_succ, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
positivity
· linarith
· linarith
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖exp x - 1‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 1, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by simp [sum_range_succ]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 1 * ((Nat.succ 1 : ℝ) * ((Nat.factorial 1) * (1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ = 2 * ‖x‖ := by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm, add_mul, Nat.factorial]
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1 - x‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp x - 1 - x‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 2, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sum_range_succ_comm, add_assoc, Nat.factorial]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * ((Nat.succ 2 : ℝ) * (Nat.factorial 2 * (2 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * 1 := by gcongr; norm_num [Nat.factorial]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_one]
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
calc ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
_ ≤ (∑ m ∈ range j, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj, sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
refine (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..).trans_eq ?_
congr with i
simp [Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
gcongr
exact Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
lemma norm_exp_le_exp_norm (x : ℂ) : ‖exp x‖ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
convert norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum x 0 using 1 <;> simp
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ _
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr with i hi
· rw [Complex.norm_pow]
· simp
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
rw [← mul_sum]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) := by
congr 1
refine (sum_bij (fun m hm ↦ m + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro a ha
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, zero_le, and_true]
simp only [mem_range] at ha
rwa [← lt_tsub_iff_right]
· intro a ha b hb hab
simpa using hab
· intro b hb
simp only [mem_range, exists_prop]
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range] at hb
refine ⟨b - n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hb.2]
exact hb.1
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hb.2]
· simp
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
gcongr
refine Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg ?_ _
exact norm_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_le := norm_exp_sub_one_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le := norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_abs_sub_sum :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_le_exp_abs := norm_exp_le_exp_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_abs_mul_exp :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex Finset
nonrec theorem exp_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
|exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial| ≤ |x| ^ n * (n.succ / (n.factorial * n)) := by
have hxc : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
convert exp_bound hxc hn using 2 <;>
norm_cast
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Real.exp x ≤ (∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) +
x ^ n * (n + 1) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h3 : |x| = x := by simpa
have h4 : |x| ≤ 1 := by rwa [h3]
have h' := Real.exp_bound h4 hn
rw [h3] at h'
have h'' := (abs_sub_le_iff.1 h').1
have t := sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 h''
simpa [mul_div_assoc] using t
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1| ≤ 2 * |x| := by
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_le (x := x) this
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1 - x| ≤ x ^ 2 := by
rw [← sq_abs]
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le this
/-- A finite initial segment of the exponential series, followed by an arbitrary tail.
For fixed `n` this is just a linear map wrt `r`, and each map is a simple linear function
of the previous (see `expNear_succ`), with `expNear n x r ⟶ exp x` as `n ⟶ ∞`,
for any `r`. -/
noncomputable def expNear (n : ℕ) (x r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) + x ^ n / n.factorial * r
@[simp]
theorem expNear_zero (x r) : expNear 0 x r = r := by simp [expNear]
@[simp]
theorem expNear_succ (n x r) : expNear (n + 1) x r = expNear n x (1 + x / (n + 1) * r) := by
simp [expNear, range_succ, mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, pow_succ, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
theorem expNear_sub (n x r₁ r₂) : expNear n x r₁ -
expNear n x r₂ = x ^ n / n.factorial * (r₁ - r₂) := by
simp [expNear, mul_sub]
theorem exp_approx_end (n m : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (h : |x| ≤ 1) :
|exp x - expNear m x 0| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * ((m + 1) / m) := by
simp only [expNear, mul_zero, add_zero]
convert exp_bound (n := m) h ?_ using 1
· field_simp [mul_comm]
· omega
theorem exp_approx_succ {n} {x a₁ b₁ : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (a₂ b₂ : ℝ)
(e : |1 + x / m * a₂ - a₁| ≤ b₁ - |x| / m * b₂)
(h : |exp x - expNear m x a₂| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * b₂) :
|exp x - expNear n x a₁| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
refine (abs_sub_le _ _ _).trans ((add_le_add_right h _).trans ?_)
subst e₁; rw [expNear_succ, expNear_sub, abs_mul]
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (a := |x| ^ n / ↑(Nat.factorial n))
(le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 e) ?_ using 1
· simp [mul_add, pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, abs_mul, abs_inv, ← pow_abs, mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
· simp [div_nonneg, abs_nonneg]
theorem exp_approx_end' {n} {x a b : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (rm : ℝ) (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |x| ≤ 1) (e : |1 - a| ≤ b - |x| / rm * ((rm + 1) / rm)) :
|exp x - expNear n x a| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b := by
subst er
exact exp_approx_succ _ e₁ _ _ (by simpa using e) (exp_approx_end _ _ _ e₁ h)
theorem exp_1_approx_succ_eq {n} {a₁ b₁ : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (en : n + 1 = m) {rm : ℝ} (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |exp 1 - expNear m 1 ((a₁ - 1) * rm)| ≤ |1| ^ m / m.factorial * (b₁ * rm)) :
|exp 1 - expNear n 1 a₁| ≤ |1| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
subst er
refine exp_approx_succ _ en _ _ ?_ h
field_simp [show (m : ℝ) ≠ 0 by norm_cast; omega]
theorem exp_approx_start (x a b : ℝ) (h : |exp x - expNear 0 x a| ≤ |x| ^ 0 / Nat.factorial 0 * b) :
|exp x - a| ≤ b := by simpa using h
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x < 1 / (1 - x) := by
have H : 0 < 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := calc
0 < x ^ 3 := by positivity
_ = 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := by ring
calc
exp x ≤ _ := exp_bound' h1.le h2.le zero_lt_three
_ ≤ 1 + x + x ^ 2 := by
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [Finset.sum] <;> nlinarith`
-- This proof should be restored after the norm_num plugin for big operators is ported.
-- (It may also need the positivity extensions in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3907.)
rw [show 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 from rfl]
repeat rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
norm_num [Nat.factorial]
nlinarith
_ < 1 / (1 - x) := by rw [lt_div_iff₀] <;> nlinarith
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x ≤ 1 / (1 - x) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with (rfl | h1)
· simp
· exact (exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' h1 h2).le
theorem add_one_lt_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x + 1 < Real.exp x := by
obtain hx | hx := hx.symm.lt_or_lt
· exact add_one_lt_exp_of_pos hx
obtain h' | h' := le_or_lt 1 (-x)
· linarith [x.exp_pos]
have hx' : 0 < x + 1 := by linarith
simpa [add_comm, exp_neg, inv_lt_inv₀ (exp_pos _) hx']
using exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' (neg_pos.2 hx) h'
theorem add_one_le_exp (x : ℝ) : x + 1 ≤ Real.exp x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
· exact (add_one_lt_exp hx).le
lemma one_sub_lt_exp_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : 1 - x < exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_lt <| add_one_lt_exp <| neg_ne_zero.2 hx
lemma one_sub_le_exp_neg (x : ℝ) : 1 - x ≤ exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_le <| add_one_le_exp _
theorem one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg {n : ℕ} {t : ℝ} (ht' : t ≤ n) : (1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ exp (-t) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rwa [Nat.cast_zero] at ht'
calc
(1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ rexp (-(t / n)) ^ n := by
gcongr
· exact sub_nonneg.2 <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ht' n.cast_nonneg
· exact one_sub_le_exp_neg _
_ = rexp (-t) := by rw [← Real.exp_nat_mul, mul_neg, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀]; positivity
lemma le_inv_mul_exp (x : ℝ) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) : x ≤ c⁻¹ * exp (c * x) := by
rw [le_inv_mul_iff₀ hc]
calc c * x
_ ≤ c * x + 1 := le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
_ ≤ _ := Real.add_one_le_exp (c * x)
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Real.exp` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.exp _]
def evalExp : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.exp $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.exp_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.exp"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Complex
@[simp]
theorem norm_exp_ofReal (x : ℝ) : ‖exp x‖ = Real.exp x := by
rw [← ofReal_exp]
exact Complex.norm_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (Real.exp_pos _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_ofReal := norm_exp_ofReal
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 1,138 | 1,138 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft_symm (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv = (λ_ X).inv ≫ _ ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f = (λ_ X).inv ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ f ≫ (λ_ X').hom := by
simp only [id_whiskerLeft, assoc, inv_hom_id, comp_id, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f ≫ (ρ_ X').inv = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ _ := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ◁ f = 𝟙_ C ◁ g ↔ f = g := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f ▷ 𝟙_ C = g ▷ 𝟙_ C ↔ f = g := by simp
/-! The lemmas in the next section are true by coherence,
but we prove them directly as they are used in proving the coherence theorem. -/
section
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 537 | 540 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,124 | 2,124 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives
This file defines the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` where `𝕜` is a
normed field and `F` is a normed space over this field. The derivative of
such a function `f` at a point `x` is given by an element `f' : F`.
The theory is developed analogously to the [Fréchet
derivatives](./fderiv.html). We first introduce predicates defined in terms
of the corresponding predicates for Fréchet derivatives:
- `HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
- `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` states that the function `f` has the
derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
- `HasDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x`.
- `HasStrictDerivAt f f' x` states that the function `f` has the derivative `f'`
at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability, i.e.,
`f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o (y - z)` as `y, z → x`.
For the last two notions we also define a functional version:
- `derivWithin f s x` is a derivative of `f` at `x` within `s`. If the
derivative does not exist, then `derivWithin f s x` equals zero.
- `deriv f x` is a derivative of `f` at `x`. If the derivative does not
exist, then `deriv f x` equals zero.
The theorems `fderivWithin_derivWithin` and `fderiv_deriv` show that the
one-dimensional derivatives coincide with the general Fréchet derivatives.
We also show the existence and compute the derivatives of:
- constants
- the identity function
- linear maps (in `Linear.lean`)
- addition (in `Add.lean`)
- sum of finitely many functions (in `Add.lean`)
- negation (in `Add.lean`)
- subtraction (in `Add.lean`)
- star (in `Star.lean`)
- multiplication of two functions in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Mul.lean`)
- multiplication of a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` and of a function in `𝕜 → E` (in `Mul.lean`)
- powers of a function (in `Pow.lean` and `ZPow.lean`)
- inverse `x → x⁻¹` (in `Inv.lean`)
- division (in `Inv.lean`)
- composition of a function in `𝕜 → F` with a function in `𝕜 → 𝕜` (in `Comp.lean`)
- composition of a function in `F → E` with a function in `𝕜 → F` (in `Comp.lean`)
- inverse function (assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `Inverse.lean`)
- polynomials (in `Polynomial.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
We set up the simplifier so that it can compute the derivative of simple functions. For instance,
```lean
example (x : ℝ) :
deriv (fun x ↦ cos (sin x) * exp x) x = (cos (sin x) - sin (sin x) * cos x) * exp x := by
simp; ring
```
The relationship between the derivative of a function and its definition from a standard
undergraduate course as the limit of the slope `(f y - f x) / (y - x)` as `y` tends to `𝓝[≠] x`
is developed in the file `Slope.lean`.
## Implementation notes
Most of the theorems are direct restatements of the corresponding theorems
for Fréchet derivatives.
The strategy to construct simp lemmas that give the simplifier the possibility to compute
derivatives is the same as the one for differentiability statements, as explained in
`FDeriv/Basic.lean`. See the explanations there.
-/
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
section
variable [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` as `x` goes along the filter `L`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges along the filter `L`.
-/
def HasDerivAtFilter (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) (L : Filter 𝕜) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x L
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def HasDerivWithinAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x`.
That is, `f x' = f x + (x' - x) • f' + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def HasDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` in the sense of strict differentiability.
That is, `f y - f z = (y - z) • f' + o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. -/
def HasStrictDerivAt (f : 𝕜 → F) (f' : F) (x : 𝕜) :=
HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x
end
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • derivWithin f s x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`.
-/
def derivWithin (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x 1
/-- Derivative of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasDerivAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + (x' - x) • deriv f x + o(x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`.
-/
def deriv (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) :=
fderiv 𝕜 f x 1
variable {f f₀ f₁ : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section
variable [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F]
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L` in terms of `HasDerivAtFilter` -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L := by simp [HasDerivAtFilter]
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L → HasDerivAtFilter f (f' 1) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter.mp
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
/-- Expressing `HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x` in terms of `HasFDerivWithinAt` -/
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasDerivWithinAt f (f' 1) s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasDerivWithinAt.mp
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x → HasFDerivWithinAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt.mp
/-- Expressing `HasFDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasDerivAt` -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} : HasFDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt.mp
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x := by
simp [HasStrictDerivAt, HasStrictFDerivAt]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt {f' : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F} :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x → HasStrictDerivAt f (f' 1) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_hasStrictDerivAt.mp
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt :
HasStrictDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨HasStrictDerivAt.hasStrictFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_iff_hasStrictFDerivAt
/-- Expressing `HasDerivAt f f' x` in terms of `HasFDerivAt` -/
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt {f' : F} :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') x :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
end
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h]
simp
theorem differentiableWithinAt_of_derivWithin_ne_zero (h : derivWithin f s x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
not_imp_comm.1 derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
end TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt (h : ¬UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin f s x = 0 :=
derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt <| mt AccPt.uniqueDiffWithinAt h
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_isolated (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_isolated h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem derivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : derivWithin f s x = 0 := by
rw [derivWithin, fderivWithin_zero_of_nmem_closure h, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : deriv f x = 0 := by
unfold deriv
rw [fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h]
simp
theorem differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h : deriv f x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
not_imp_comm.1 deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq_deriv (s : Set 𝕜) (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h₁ : HasDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq H h h₁
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' : 𝕜 => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) L (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun x' : 𝕜 => f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f') =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - (x' - x) • f'‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub_rev (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hf' : f' ≠ 0) :
(fun x' => x' - x) =O[L] fun x' => f x' - f x :=
suffices AntilipschitzWith ‖f'‖₊⁻¹ (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') from hf.isBigO_sub_rev this
AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound (smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) f') fun x => by
simp [norm_smul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (mt norm_eq_zero.1 hf')]
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivAt f f' x :=
h.hasFDerivAt
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set 𝕜} (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.congr_set, _⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_congr_set
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {x}) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton _
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ici x) x := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iio x) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Iic x) x := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, hasDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton]
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Iic_of_Iio, HasDerivWithinAt.Iio_of_Iic⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_Iio_iff_Iic
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo [LinearOrder 𝕜] [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {x y : 𝕜} (h : x < y) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioo x y) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter <| Iio_mem_nhds h
alias ⟨HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ioo, HasDerivWithinAt.Ioo_of_Ioi⟩ := HasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_iff_Ioo
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h => f (x + h) - f x - h • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.mono h hst
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h hst
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin h hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter h hL
theorem HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt h
theorem HasDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt h
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_univ : HasDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem HasDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' :=
smulRight_one_eq_iff.mp <| h₀.hasFDerivAt.unique h₁
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' h
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter h
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : HasDerivWithinAt f f' t x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x :=
hs.hasFDerivWithinAt.union ht.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f f' x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt h hs
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.hasDerivAt
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_deriv_iff : HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableAt, fun h => h.hasDerivAt⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_derivWithin_iff :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f s x) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableWithinAt, fun h => h.hasDerivWithinAt⟩
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasDerivAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasDerivAt f (deriv f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.deriv (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : deriv f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasDerivAt.unique h
theorem deriv_eq {f' : 𝕜 → F} (h : ∀ x, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) : deriv f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).deriv
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.derivWithin (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin f s x = f' :=
hxs.eq_deriv _ h.differentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
theorem fderivWithin_derivWithin : (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = derivWithin f s x :=
rfl
theorem derivWithin_fderivWithin :
smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (derivWithin f s x) = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by simp [derivWithin]
theorem norm_derivWithin_eq_norm_fderivWithin : ‖derivWithin f s x‖ = ‖fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x‖ := by
simp [← derivWithin_fderivWithin]
theorem fderiv_deriv : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → F) 1 = deriv f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_eq_smul_deriv (y : 𝕜) : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → F) y = y • deriv f x := by
rw [← fderiv_deriv, ← ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul]
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem deriv_fderiv : smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (deriv f x) = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [deriv, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_one_one]
lemma fderiv_eq_deriv_mul {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {x y : 𝕜} : (fderiv 𝕜 f x : 𝕜 → 𝕜) y = (deriv f x) * y := by
simp [mul_comm]
theorem norm_deriv_eq_norm_fderiv : ‖deriv f x‖ = ‖fderiv 𝕜 f x‖ := by
simp [← deriv_fderiv]
theorem DifferentiableAt.derivWithin (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin f s x = deriv f x := by
unfold _root_.derivWithin deriv
rw [h.fderivWithin hxs]
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.deriv_eq_zero (hd : HasDerivWithinAt f 0 s x)
(H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : deriv f x = 0 :=
(em' (DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x)).elim deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt fun h =>
H.eq_deriv _ h.hasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt hd
theorem derivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin (st : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x :=
((DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin st).derivWithin ht
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")] alias derivWithin_of_mem := derivWithin_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem derivWithin_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x) : derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x :=
((DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h).mono st).derivWithin ht
theorem derivWithin_congr_set' (y : 𝕜) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x := by simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_congr_set' y h]
theorem derivWithin_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : derivWithin f s x = derivWithin f t x := by
simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_congr_set h]
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_univ : derivWithin f univ = deriv f := by
ext
unfold derivWithin deriv
rw [fderivWithin_univ]
theorem derivWithin_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) : derivWithin f (s ∩ t) x = derivWithin f s x := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_inter ht]
theorem derivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : derivWithin f s x = deriv f x := by
simp only [derivWithin, deriv, fderivWithin_of_mem_nhds h]
theorem derivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : derivWithin f s x = deriv f x :=
derivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
lemma deriv_eqOn {f' : 𝕜 → F} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) :
s.EqOn (deriv f) f' := fun x hx ↦ by
rw [← derivWithin_of_isOpen hs hx, (hf' _ hx).derivWithin <| hs.uniqueDiffWithinAt hx]
theorem deriv_mem_iff {f : 𝕜 → F} {s : Set F} {x : 𝕜} :
deriv f x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ deriv f x ∈ s ∨ ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x ∧ (0 : F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x <;> simp [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt, *]
theorem derivWithin_mem_iff {f : 𝕜 → F} {t : Set 𝕜} {s : Set F} {x : 𝕜} :
derivWithin f t x ∈ s ↔
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ derivWithin f t x ∈ s ∨
¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x ∧ (0 : F) ∈ s := by
by_cases hx : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t x <;>
simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, *]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici [PartialOrder 𝕜] :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (Ioi x) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f (Ici x) x :=
⟨fun h => h.hasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi.differentiableWithinAt, fun h =>
h.hasDerivWithinAt.Ioi_of_Ici.differentiableWithinAt⟩
-- Golfed while splitting the file
theorem derivWithin_Ioi_eq_Ici {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] (f : ℝ → E)
(x : ℝ) : derivWithin f (Ioi x) x = derivWithin f (Ici x) x := by
by_cases H : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x
· have A := H.hasDerivWithinAt.Ici_of_Ioi
have B := (differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici.1 H).hasDerivWithinAt
simpa using (uniqueDiffOn_Ici x).eq left_mem_Ici A B
· rw [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt H,
derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici] at H
section congr
/-! ### Congruence properties of derivatives -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivAtFilter_iff (h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x)
(h₁ : f₀' = f₁') : HasDerivAtFilter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f₁ f₁' x L :=
h₀.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx (by simp [h₁])
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[L] f)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasDerivAtFilter f₁ f' x L := by rwa [hL.hasDerivAtFilter_iff hx rfl]
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (ht : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' t x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h ht hx h₁
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_mono hs hx (Subset.refl _)
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : x ∈ s) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr hs (hs _ hx)
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ hx
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivWithinAt_iff (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁.symm hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx⟩
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) : HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (h₁.eq_of_nhdsWithin hx)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivWithinAt_iff_of_mem (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasDerivWithinAt f₁ f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁.symm hx,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h₁ hx⟩
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.congr_deriv (h : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasStrictDerivAt f g' x :=
h.congr_fderiv <| congr_arg _ h'
theorem HasDerivAt.congr_deriv (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h' : f' = g') : HasDerivAt f g' x :=
HasFDerivAt.congr_fderiv h <| congr_arg _ h'
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.congr_deriv (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (h' : f' = g') :
HasDerivWithinAt f g' s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_fderiv h <| congr_arg _ h'
theorem HasDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
HasDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhds h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasDerivAt_iff (h : f₀ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f₁) :
HasDerivAt f₀ f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f₁ f' x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq h⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.derivWithin_eq (hs : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
derivWithin f₁ s x = derivWithin f s x := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [hs.fderivWithin_eq hx]
theorem derivWithin_congr (hs : EqOn f₁ f s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
derivWithin f₁ s x = derivWithin f s x := by
unfold derivWithin
rw [fderivWithin_congr hs hx]
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.deriv_eq (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : deriv f₁ x = deriv f x := by
unfold deriv
rwa [Filter.EventuallyEq.fderiv_eq]
protected theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.deriv (h : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : deriv f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] deriv f :=
h.eventuallyEq_nhds.mono fun _ h => h.deriv_eq
end congr
section id
/-! ### Derivative of the identity -/
variable (s x L)
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_id : HasDerivAtFilter id 1 x L :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_id x L).hasDerivAtFilter
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_id : HasDerivWithinAt id 1 s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_id _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_id : HasDerivAt id 1 x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_id _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_id' : HasDerivAt (fun x : 𝕜 => x) 1 x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_id _ _
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_id : HasStrictDerivAt id 1 x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_id x).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem deriv_id : deriv id x = 1 :=
HasDerivAt.deriv (hasDerivAt_id x)
@[simp]
theorem deriv_id' : deriv (@id 𝕜) = fun _ => 1 :=
funext deriv_id
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
@[simp]
theorem deriv_id'' : (deriv fun x : 𝕜 => x) = fun _ => 1 :=
deriv_id'
theorem derivWithin_id (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin id s x = 1 :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_id x s).derivWithin hxs
/-- Variant with `fun x => x` rather than `id` -/
theorem derivWithin_id' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : derivWithin (fun x => x) s x = 1 :=
derivWithin_id x s hxs
end id
section Const
/-! ### Derivative of constant functions
This include the constant functions `0`, `1`, `Nat.cast n`, `Int.cast z`, and other numerals.
-/
variable (c : F) (s x L)
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_const : HasDerivAtFilter (fun _ => c) 0 x L :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_const c x L).hasDerivAtFilter
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_zero : HasDerivAtFilter (0 : 𝕜 → F) 0 x L :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_one [One F] : HasDerivAtFilter (1 : 𝕜 → F) 0 x L :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : HasDerivAtFilter (n : 𝕜 → F) 0 x L :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : HasDerivAtFilter (z : 𝕜 → F) 0 x L :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : HasDerivAtFilter (ofNat(n) : 𝕜 → F) 0 x L :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_const : HasStrictDerivAt (fun _ => c) 0 x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_const c x).hasStrictDerivAt
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_zero : HasStrictDerivAt (0 : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_one [One F] : HasStrictDerivAt (1 : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : HasStrictDerivAt (n : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : HasStrictDerivAt (z : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _
theorem HasStrictDerivAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : HasStrictDerivAt (ofNat(n) : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasStrictDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_const : HasDerivWithinAt (fun _ => c) 0 s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_zero : HasDerivWithinAt (0 : 𝕜 → F) 0 s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_zero _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_one [One F] : HasDerivWithinAt (1 : 𝕜 → F) 0 s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : HasDerivWithinAt (n : 𝕜 → F) 0 s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : HasDerivWithinAt (z : 𝕜 → F) 0 s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : HasDerivWithinAt (ofNat(n) : 𝕜 → F) 0 s x :=
hasDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_const : HasDerivAt (fun _ => c) 0 x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_zero : HasDerivAt (0 : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_zero _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_one [One F] : HasDerivAt (1 : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : HasDerivAt (n : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : HasDerivAt (z : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasDerivAt_const _ _
theorem hasDerivAt_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : HasDerivAt (ofNat(n) : 𝕜 → F) 0 x :=
hasDerivAt_const _ _
theorem deriv_const : deriv (fun _ => c) x = 0 :=
HasDerivAt.deriv (hasDerivAt_const x c)
@[simp]
theorem deriv_const' : (deriv fun _ : 𝕜 => c) = fun _ => 0 :=
funext fun x => deriv_const x c
@[simp]
theorem deriv_zero : deriv (0 : 𝕜 → F) = 0 := funext fun _ => deriv_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem deriv_one [One F] : deriv (1 : 𝕜 → F) = 0 := funext fun _ => deriv_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem deriv_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : deriv (n : 𝕜 → F) = 0 := funext fun _ => deriv_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem deriv_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : deriv (z : 𝕜 → F) = 0 := funext fun _ => deriv_const _ _
@[simp low]
theorem deriv_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : deriv (ofNat(n) : 𝕜 → F) = 0 :=
funext fun _ => deriv_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_const : derivWithin (fun _ => c) s = 0 := by
ext; simp [derivWithin]
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_zero : derivWithin (0 : 𝕜 → F) s = 0 := derivWithin_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_one [One F] : derivWithin (1 : 𝕜 → F) s = 0 := derivWithin_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_natCast [NatCast F] (n : ℕ) : derivWithin (n : 𝕜 → F) s = 0 :=
derivWithin_const _ _
@[simp]
theorem derivWithin_intCast [IntCast F] (z : ℤ) : derivWithin (z : 𝕜 → F) s = 0 :=
derivWithin_const _ _
@[simp low]
theorem derivWithin_ofNat (n : ℕ) [OfNat F n] : derivWithin (ofNat(n) : 𝕜 → F) s = 0 :=
derivWithin_const _ _
end Const
section Continuous
/-! ### Continuity of a function admitting a derivative -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) (h : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
Tendsto f L (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h.tendsto_nhds hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds inf_le_left h
theorem HasDerivAt.continuousAt (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
HasDerivAtFilter.tendsto_nhds le_rfl h
protected theorem HasDerivAt.continuousOn {f f' : 𝕜 → F} (hderiv : ∀ x ∈ s, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) :
| ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (hderiv x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
end Continuous
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic.lean | 785 | 787 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions.SumProd
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
/-!
# Constructions of new topological spaces from old ones
This file constructs pi types, subtypes and quotients of topological spaces
and sets up their basic theory, such as criteria for maps into or out of these
constructions to be continuous; descriptions of the open sets, neighborhood filters,
and generators of these constructions; and their behavior with respect to embeddings
and other specific classes of maps.
## Implementation note
The constructed topologies are defined using induced and coinduced topologies
along with the complete lattice structure on topologies. Their universal properties
(for example, a map `X → Y × Z` is continuous if and only if both projections
`X → Y`, `X → Z` are) follow easily using order-theoretic descriptions of
continuity. With more work we can also extract descriptions of the open sets,
neighborhood filters and so on.
## Tags
product, subspace, quotient space
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
open scoped Set.Notation
universe u v u' v'
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
/-!
### `Additive`, `Multiplicative`
The topology on those type synonyms is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 x.toMul = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 x.toAdd = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
end
/-!
### Order dual
The topology on this type synonym is inherited without change.
-/
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance OrderDual.instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instDiscreteTopology [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹_›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
variable [Preorder X] {x : X}
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [(𝓝[<] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
instance OrderDual.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [(𝓝[>] x).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] toDual x).NeBot := ‹_›
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
/-- The image of a dense set under `Quotient.mk'` is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
/-- The composition of `Quotient.mk'` and a function with dense range has dense range. -/
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_nhdsWithin_range {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β) (y : β) :
comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) := comap_inf_principal_range
section Top
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
/-
The 𝓝 filter and the subspace topology.
-/
theorem mem_nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
t ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (x : X), Subtype.val ⁻¹' u ⊆ t :=
mem_nhds_induced _ x t
theorem nhds_subtype (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) : 𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝 (x : X)) :=
nhds_induced _ x
lemma nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin (s : Set X) (x : { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝 x = comap (↑) (𝓝[s] (x : X)) := by
rw [nhds_subtype, ← comap_nhdsWithin_range, Subtype.range_val]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff {s t : Set X} {x : s} :
𝓝[((↑) : s → X) ⁻¹' t] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[t] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ := by
rw [inf_principal_eq_bot_iff_comap, nhdsWithin, nhdsWithin, comap_inf, comap_principal,
nhds_induced]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ ↔ 𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_subtype_eq_bot_iff, preimage_compl, ← image_singleton,
Subtype.coe_injective.preimage_image]
theorem nhds_ne_subtype_neBot_iff {S : Set X} {x : S} :
(𝓝[≠] x).NeBot ↔ (𝓝[≠] (x : X) ⊓ 𝓟 S).NeBot := by
rw [neBot_iff, neBot_iff, not_iff_not, nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
theorem discreteTopology_subtype_iff {S : Set X} :
DiscreteTopology S ↔ ∀ x ∈ S, 𝓝[≠] x ⊓ 𝓟 S = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne, SetCoe.forall', nhds_ne_subtype_eq_bot_iff]
end Top
/-- A type synonym equipped with the topology whose open sets are the empty set and the sets with
finite complements. -/
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
namespace CofiniteTopology
/-- The identity equivalence between `` and `CofiniteTopology `. -/
def of : X ≃ CofiniteTopology X :=
Equiv.refl X
instance [Inhabited X] : Inhabited (CofiniteTopology X) where default := of default
instance : TopologicalSpace (CofiniteTopology X) where
IsOpen s := s.Nonempty → Set.Finite sᶜ
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro hs ht ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
rw [compl_inter]
exact (hs ⟨x, hxs⟩).union (ht ⟨x, hxt⟩)
isOpen_sUnion := by
rintro s h ⟨x, t, hts, hzt⟩
rw [compl_sUnion]
exact Finite.sInter (mem_image_of_mem _ hts) (h t hts ⟨x, hzt⟩)
theorem isOpen_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s.Nonempty → sᶜ.Finite :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOpen_iff' {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsOpen s ↔ s = ∅ ∨ sᶜ.Finite := by
simp only [isOpen_iff, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, or_iff_not_imp_left]
theorem isClosed_iff {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} : IsClosed s ↔ s = univ ∨ s.Finite := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff', compl_compl, compl_empty_iff]
theorem nhds_eq (x : CofiniteTopology X) : 𝓝 x = pure x ⊔ cofinite := by
ext U
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, hVU, V_op, haV⟩
exact mem_sup.mpr ⟨hVU haV, mem_of_superset (V_op ⟨_, haV⟩) hVU⟩
· rintro ⟨hU : x ∈ U, hU' : Uᶜ.Finite⟩
exact ⟨U, Subset.rfl, fun _ => hU', hU⟩
theorem mem_nhds_iff {x : CofiniteTopology X} {s : Set (CofiniteTopology X)} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s ∧ sᶜ.Finite := by simp [nhds_eq]
end CofiniteTopology
end Constructions
section Prod
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
theorem MapClusterPt.curry_prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la.curry lb) (.map f g) := by
rw [mapClusterPt_iff_frequently] at hf hg
rw [((𝓝 x).basis_sets.prod_nhds (𝓝 y).basis_sets).mapClusterPt_iff_frequently]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ ⟨hs, ht⟩
rw [frequently_curry_iff]
exact (hf s hs).mono fun x hx ↦ (hg t ht).mono fun y hy ↦ ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem MapClusterPt.prodMap {α β : Type*}
{f : α → X} {g : β → Y} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {x : X} {y : Y}
(hf : MapClusterPt x la f) (hg : MapClusterPt y lb g) :
MapClusterPt (x, y) (la ×ˢ lb) (.map f g) :=
(hf.curry_prodMap hg).mono <| map_mono curry_le_prod
end Prod
section Bool
lemma continuous_bool_rng [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → Bool} (b : Bool) :
Continuous f ↔ IsClopen (f ⁻¹' {b}) := by
rw [continuous_discrete_rng, Bool.forall_bool' b, IsClopen, ← isOpen_compl_iff, ← preimage_compl,
Bool.compl_singleton, and_comm]
end Bool
section Subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {p : X → Prop}
lemma Topology.IsInducing.subtypeVal {t : Set Y} : IsInducing ((↑) : t → Y) := ⟨rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias inducing_subtype_val := IsInducing.subtypeVal
lemma Topology.IsInducing.of_codRestrict {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (ht : ∀ x, f x ∈ t)
(h : IsInducing (t.codRestrict f ht)) : IsInducing f := subtypeVal.comp h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.of_codRestrict := IsInducing.of_codRestrict
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.subtypeVal : IsEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, Subtype.coe_injective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")] alias embedding_subtype_val := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal
theorem Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.subtypeVal (h : IsClosed {a | p a}) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : Subtype p → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, by rwa [Subtype.range_coe_subtype]⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_subtype_val : Continuous (@Subtype.val X p) :=
continuous_induced_dom
theorem Continuous.subtype_val {f : Y → Subtype p} (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous fun x => (f x : X) :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp hf
theorem IsOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) :=
⟨.subtypeVal, (@Subtype.range_coe _ s).symm ▸ hs⟩
theorem IsOpen.isOpenMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpenMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpenMap
theorem IsOpenMap.restrict {f : X → Y} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenMap (s.restrict f) :=
hf.comp hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedEmbedding ((↑) : s → X) := .subtypeVal hs
theorem IsClosed.isClosedMap_subtype_val {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s) :
IsClosedMap ((↑) : s → X) :=
hs.isClosedEmbedding_subtypeVal.isClosedMap
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.subtype_mk {f : Y → X} (h : Continuous f) (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
Continuous fun x => (⟨f x, hp x⟩ : Subtype p) :=
continuous_induced_rng.2 h
theorem Continuous.subtype_map {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) {q : Y → Prop}
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) : Continuous (Subtype.map f hpq) :=
(h.comp continuous_subtype_val).subtype_mk _
theorem continuous_inclusion {s t : Set X} (h : s ⊆ t) : Continuous (inclusion h) :=
continuous_id.subtype_map h
theorem continuousAt_subtype_val {p : X → Prop} {x : Subtype p} :
ContinuousAt ((↑) : Subtype p → X) x :=
continuous_subtype_val.continuousAt
theorem Subtype.dense_iff {s : Set X} {t : Set s} : Dense t ↔ s ⊆ closure ((↑) '' t) := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.dense_iff, SetCoe.forall]
rfl
theorem map_nhds_subtype_val {s : Set X} (x : s) : map ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[s] ↑x := by
rw [IsInducing.subtypeVal.map_nhds_eq, Subtype.range_val]
theorem map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds {x : X} (hx : p x) (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) :
map ((↑) : Subtype p → X) (𝓝 ⟨x, hx⟩) = 𝓝 x :=
map_nhds_induced_of_mem <| by rw [Subtype.range_val]; exact h
theorem nhds_subtype_eq_comap {x : X} {h : p x} : 𝓝 (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) = comap (↑) (𝓝 x) :=
nhds_induced _ _
theorem tendsto_subtype_rng {Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {l : Filter Y} {f : Y → Subtype p} :
∀ {x : Subtype p}, Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x : X)) l (𝓝 (x : X))
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => by rw [nhds_subtype_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem closure_subtype {x : { a // p a }} {s : Set { a // p a }} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ (x : X) ∈ closure (((↑) : _ → X) '' s) :=
closure_induced
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_codRestrict_iff {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (h1 : ∀ x, f x ∈ t) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt (codRestrict f t h1) x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.continuousAt_iff
alias ⟨_, ContinuousAt.codRestrict⟩ := continuousAt_codRestrict_iff
theorem ContinuousAt.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t) {x : s}
(h2 : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (h1.restrict f s t) x :=
(h2.comp continuousAt_subtype_val).codRestrict _
theorem ContinuousAt.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} {x : f ⁻¹' s} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousAt (s.restrictPreimage f) x :=
h.restrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.codRestrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ a, f a ∈ s) :
Continuous (s.codRestrict f hs) :=
hf.subtype_mk hs
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrict {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (h1 : MapsTo f s t)
(h2 : Continuous f) : Continuous (h1.restrict f s t) :=
(h2.comp continuous_subtype_val).codRestrict _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.restrictPreimage {f : X → Y} {s : Set Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Continuous (s.restrictPreimage f) :=
h.restrict _
lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) :
IsEmbedding H.restrict :=
.of_comp (hf.continuous.restrict H) continuous_subtype_val (hf.comp .subtypeVal)
lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.restrict {f : X → Y}
(hf : IsOpenEmbedding f) {s : Set X} {t : Set Y} (H : s.MapsTo f t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpenEmbedding H.restrict :=
⟨hf.isEmbedding.restrict H, (by
rw [MapsTo.range_restrict]
exact continuous_subtype_val.1 _ (hf.isOpenMap _ hs))⟩
theorem Topology.IsInducing.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsInducing e) {s : Set Y}
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsInducing (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.codRestrict := IsInducing.codRestrict
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.codRestrict {e : X → Y} (he : IsEmbedding e) (s : Set Y)
(hs : ∀ x, e x ∈ s) : IsEmbedding (codRestrict e s hs) :=
he.of_comp (he.continuous.codRestrict hs) continuous_subtype_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Embedding.codRestrict := IsEmbedding.codRestrict
variable {s t : Set X}
protected lemma Topology.IsEmbedding.inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) :
IsEmbedding (inclusion h) := IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.codRestrict _ _
protected lemma Topology.IsOpenEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsOpen (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsOpenEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isOpen_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
protected lemma Topology.IsClosedEmbedding.inclusion (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : IsClosed (t ↓∩ s)) :
IsClosedEmbedding (inclusion hst) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion _
isClosed_range := by rwa [range_inclusion]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding_inclusion := IsEmbedding.inclusion
/-- Let `s, t ⊆ X` be two subsets of a topological space `X`. If `t ⊆ s` and the topology induced
by `X`on `s` is discrete, then also the topology induces on `t` is discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_subset {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {s t : Set X}
(_ : DiscreteTopology s) (ts : t ⊆ s) : DiscreteTopology t :=
(IsEmbedding.inclusion ts).discreteTopology
/-- Let `s` be a discrete subset of a topological space. Then the preimage of `s` by
a continuous injective map is also discrete. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.preimage_of_continuous_injective {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
[TopologicalSpace Y] (s : Set Y) [DiscreteTopology s] {f : X → Y} (hc : Continuous f)
(hinj : Function.Injective f) : DiscreteTopology (f ⁻¹' s) :=
DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective (β := s) (Continuous.restrict
(by exact fun _ x ↦ x) hc) ((MapsTo.restrict_inj _).mpr hinj.injOn)
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a quotient map,
then its restriction to the preimage of an open set is a quotient map too. -/
theorem Topology.IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen {f : X → Y} (hf : IsQuotientMap f)
{s : Set Y} (hs : IsOpen s) : IsQuotientMap (s.restrictPreimage f) := by
refine isQuotientMap_iff.2 ⟨hf.surjective.restrictPreimage _, fun U ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hs.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen, ← hf.isOpen_preimage,
(hs.preimage hf.continuous).isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal.isOpen_iff_image_isOpen,
image_val_preimage_restrictPreimage]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias QuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen := IsQuotientMap.restrictPreimage_isOpen
open scoped Set.Notation in
lemma isClosed_preimage_val {s t : Set X} : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) ↔ s ∩ closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ t := by
rw [← closure_eq_iff_isClosed, IsEmbedding.subtypeVal.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image,
← Subtype.val_injective.image_injective.eq_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_coe,
Subtype.image_preimage_coe, subset_antisymm_iff, and_iff_left, Set.subset_inter_iff,
and_iff_right]
exacts [Set.inter_subset_left, Set.subset_inter Set.inter_subset_left subset_closure]
theorem frontier_inter_open_inter {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ∩ t = frontier s ∩ t := by
simp only [Set.inter_comm _ t, ← Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff,
ht.isOpenMap_subtype_val.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_subtype_val,
Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter]
section SetNotation
open scoped Set.Notation
lemma IsOpen.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
lemma IsClosed.preimage_val {s t : Set X} (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ↓∩ t) :=
ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val
@[simp] lemma IsOpen.inter_preimage_val_iff {s t : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (s ↓∩ t) ↔ IsOpen (s ∩ t) :=
| ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using hs.isOpenMap_subtype_val _ h,
fun h ↦ (Subtype.preimage_coe_self_inter _ _).symm ▸ h.preimage_val⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 523 | 525 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Ordered Subtraction
This file proves lemmas relating (truncated) subtraction with an order. We provide a class
`OrderedSub` stating that `a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b`.
The subtraction discussed here could both be normal subtraction in an additive group or truncated
subtraction on a canonically ordered monoid (`ℕ`, `Multiset`, `PartENat`, `ENNReal`, ...)
## Implementation details
`OrderedSub` is a mixin type-class, so that we can use the results in this file even in cases
where we don't have a `CanonicallyOrderedAdd` instance
(even though that is our main focus). Conversely, this means we can use
`CanonicallyOrderedAdd` without necessarily having to define a subtraction.
The results in this file are ordered by the type-class assumption needed to prove it.
This means that similar results might not be close to each other. Furthermore, we don't prove
implications if a bi-implication can be proven under the same assumptions.
Lemmas using this class are named using `tsub` instead of `sub` (short for "truncated subtraction").
This is to avoid naming conflicts with similar lemmas about ordered groups.
We provide a second version of most results that require `[AddLeftReflectLE α]`. In the
second version we replace this type-class assumption by explicit `AddLECancellable` assumptions.
TODO: maybe we should make a multiplicative version of this, so that we can replace some identical
lemmas about subtraction/division in `Ordered[Add]CommGroup` with these.
TODO: generalize `Nat.le_of_le_of_sub_le_sub_right`, `Nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff`,
`Nat.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq`
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `OrderedSub α` means that `α` has a subtraction characterized by `a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b`.
In other words, `a - b` is the least `c` such that `a ≤ b + c`.
This is satisfied both by the subtraction in additive ordered groups and by truncated subtraction
in canonically ordered monoids on many specific types.
-/
class OrderedSub (α : Type*) [LE α] [Add α] [Sub α] : Prop where
/-- `a - b` provides a lower bound on `c` such that `a ≤ c + b`. -/
tsub_le_iff_right : ∀ a b c : α, a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b
section Add
@[simp]
theorem tsub_le_iff_right [LE α] [Add α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c : α} :
a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
OrderedSub.tsub_le_iff_right a b c
variable [Preorder α] [Add α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b : α}
/-- See `add_tsub_cancel_right` for the equality if `AddLeftReflectLE α`. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_right : a + b - b ≤ a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mpr le_rfl
theorem le_tsub_add : b ≤ b - a + a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mp le_rfl
end Add
/-! ### Preorder -/
section OrderedAddCommSemigroup
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section AddCommSemigroup
variable [AddCommSemigroup α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c d : α}
/- TODO: Most results can be generalized to [Add α] [@Std.Commutative α (· + ·)] -/
theorem tsub_le_iff_left : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c := by rw [tsub_le_iff_right, add_comm]
theorem le_add_tsub : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mp le_rfl
/-- See `add_tsub_cancel_left` for the equality if `AddLeftReflectLE α`. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_left : a + b - a ≤ b :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr le_rfl
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a - c ≤ b - c :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr <| h.trans le_add_tsub
theorem tsub_le_iff_tsub_le : a - b ≤ c ↔ a - c ≤ b := by rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_right]
/-- See `tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le` for the equality. -/
theorem tsub_tsub_le : b - (b - a) ≤ a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mpr le_add_tsub
section Cov
variable [AddLeftMono α]
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : c - b ≤ c - a :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr <| le_add_tsub.trans <| add_le_add_right h _
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d ≤ b - c :=
(tsub_le_tsub_right hab _).trans <| tsub_le_tsub_left hcd _
theorem antitone_const_tsub : Antitone fun x => c - x := fun _ _ hxy => tsub_le_tsub rfl.le hxy
/-- See `add_tsub_assoc_of_le` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_assoc : a + b - c ≤ a + (b - c) := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_left_comm]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub a
/-- See `tsub_add_eq_add_tsub` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_tsub_add : a + b - c ≤ a - c + b := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm _ b]
exact add_tsub_le_assoc
theorem add_le_add_add_tsub : a + b ≤ a + c + (b - c) := by
rw [add_assoc]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub a
theorem le_tsub_add_add : a + b ≤ a - c + (b + c) := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm (a - c)]
exact add_le_add_add_tsub
theorem tsub_le_tsub_add_tsub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
exact le_add_tsub.trans (add_le_add_right le_add_tsub _)
theorem tsub_tsub_tsub_le_tsub : c - a - (c - b) ≤ b - a := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_left, add_left_comm]
exact le_tsub_add.trans (add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _)
theorem tsub_tsub_le_tsub_add {a b c : α} : a - (b - c) ≤ a - b + c :=
tsub_le_iff_right.2 <|
calc
a ≤ a - b + b := le_tsub_add
_ ≤ a - b + (c + (b - c)) := add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _
_ = a - b + c + (b - c) := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
/-- See `tsub_add_tsub_comm` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub : a + b - (c + d) ≤ a - c + (b - d) := by
rw [add_comm c, tsub_le_iff_left, add_assoc, ← tsub_le_iff_left, ← tsub_le_iff_left]
refine (tsub_le_tsub_right add_tsub_le_assoc c).trans ?_
rw [add_comm a, add_comm (a - c)]
exact add_tsub_le_assoc
/-- See `add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_left` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_left : a + b - (a + c) ≤ b - c := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_assoc]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _
/-- See `add_tsub_add_eq_tsub_right` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_right : a + c - (b + c) ≤ a - b := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact add_le_add_right le_add_tsub c
end Cov
/-! #### Lemmas that assume that an element is `AddLECancellable` -/
namespace AddLECancellable
protected theorem le_add_tsub_swap (hb : AddLECancellable b) : a ≤ b + a - b :=
hb le_add_tsub
protected theorem le_add_tsub (hb : AddLECancellable b) : a ≤ a + b - b := by
rw [add_comm]
exact hb.le_add_tsub_swap
protected theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_left (ha : AddLECancellable a) (h : a + b ≤ c) : b ≤ c - a :=
ha <| h.trans le_add_tsub
protected theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_right (hb : AddLECancellable b) (h : a + b ≤ c) : a ≤ c - b :=
hb.le_tsub_of_add_le_left <| by rwa [add_comm]
end AddLECancellable
/-! ### Lemmas where addition is order-reflecting -/
section Contra
variable [AddLeftReflectLE α]
theorem le_add_tsub_swap : a ≤ b + a - b :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_add_tsub_swap
theorem le_add_tsub' : a ≤ a + b - b :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_add_tsub
theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_left (h : a + b ≤ c) : b ≤ c - a :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_tsub_of_add_le_left h
theorem le_tsub_of_add_le_right (h : a + b ≤ c) : a ≤ c - b :=
Contravariant.AddLECancellable.le_tsub_of_add_le_right h
end Contra
end AddCommSemigroup
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b : α}
theorem tsub_nonpos : a - b ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_zero]
alias ⟨_, tsub_nonpos_of_le⟩ := tsub_nonpos
end Preorder
/-! ### Partial order -/
variable [PartialOrder α] [AddCommSemigroup α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c d : α}
theorem tsub_tsub (b a c : α) : b - a - c = b - (a + c) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_left, ← add_assoc, ← tsub_le_iff_left]
· rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_assoc, ← tsub_le_iff_left, ← tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub (a b c : α) : a - (b + c) = a - b - c :=
(tsub_tsub _ _ _).symm
theorem tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub_swap (a b c : α) : a - (b + c) = a - c - b := by
rw [add_comm]
apply tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub
theorem tsub_right_comm : a - b - c = a - c - b := by
rw [← tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub_swap]
/-! ### Lemmas that assume that an element is `AddLECancellable`. -/
namespace AddLECancellable
/-- See `AddLECancellable.tsub_eq_of_eq_add'` for a version assuming that `a = c + b` itself is
cancellable rather than `b`. -/
| protected theorem tsub_eq_of_eq_add (hb : AddLECancellable b) (h : a = c + b) : a - b = c :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Sub/Defs.lean | 248 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.WellKnown
/-!
# Bernoulli numbers
The Bernoulli numbers are a sequence of rational numbers that frequently show up in
number theory.
## Mathematical overview
The Bernoulli numbers $(B_0, B_1, B_2, \ldots)=(1, -1/2, 1/6, 0, -1/30, \ldots)$ are
a sequence of rational numbers. They show up in the formula for the sums of $k$th
powers. They are related to the Taylor series expansions of $x/\tan(x)$ and
of $\coth(x)$, and also show up in the values that the Riemann Zeta function
takes both at both negative and positive integers (and hence in the
theory of modular forms). For example, if $1 \leq n$ then
$$\zeta(2n)=\sum_{t\geq1}t^{-2n}=(-1)^{n+1}\frac{(2\pi)^{2n}B_{2n}}{2(2n)!}.$$
This result is formalised in Lean: `riemannZeta_two_mul_nat`.
The Bernoulli numbers can be formally defined using the power series
$$\sum B_n\frac{t^n}{n!}=\frac{t}{1-e^{-t}}$$
although that happens to not be the definition in mathlib (this is an *implementation
detail* and need not concern the mathematician).
Note that $B_1=-1/2$, meaning that we are using the $B_n^-$ of
[from Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number).
## Implementation detail
The Bernoulli numbers are defined using well-founded induction, by the formula
$$B_n=1-\sum_{k\lt n}\frac{\binom{n}{k}}{n-k+1}B_k.$$
This formula is true for all $n$ and in particular $B_0=1$. Note that this is the definition
for positive Bernoulli numbers, which we call `bernoulli'`. The negative Bernoulli numbers are
then defined as `bernoulli := (-1)^n * bernoulli'`.
## Main theorems
`sum_bernoulli : ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (n.choose k : ℚ) * bernoulli k = if n = 1 then 1 else 0`
-/
open Nat Finset Finset.Nat PowerSeries
variable (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra ℚ A]
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- The Bernoulli numbers:
the $n$-th Bernoulli number $B_n$ is defined recursively via
$$B_n = 1 - \sum_{k < n} \binom{n}{k}\frac{B_k}{n+1-k}$$ -/
def bernoulli' : ℕ → ℚ :=
WellFounded.fix Nat.lt_wfRel.wf fun n bernoulli' =>
1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k k.2
theorem bernoulli'_def' (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k :=
WellFounded.fix_eq _ _ _
theorem bernoulli'_def (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k ∈ range n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k := by
rw [bernoulli'_def', ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
theorem bernoulli'_spec (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose (n - k) : ℚ) / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k) = 1 := by
rw [sum_range_succ_comm, bernoulli'_def n, tsub_self, choose_zero_right, sub_self, zero_add,
| div_one, cast_one, one_mul, sub_add, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_sub_cancel_left,
neg_eq_zero]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x hx => by rw [choose_symm (le_of_lt (mem_range.1 hx)), sub_self])
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Bernoulli.lean | 78 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Primrec
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# The partial recursive functions
The partial recursive functions are defined similarly to the primitive
recursive functions, but now all functions are partial, implemented
using the `Part` monad, and there is an additional operation, called
μ-recursion, which performs unbounded minimization: `μ f` returns the
least natural number `n` for which `f n = 0`, or diverges if such `n` doesn't exist.
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for functions `f : ℕ →. ℕ`
- `Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for partial functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Computable f`: `f` is partial recursive, for total functions between `Primcodable` types
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Encodable Denumerable Part
attribute [-simp] not_forall
namespace Nat
section Rfind
variable (p : ℕ →. Bool)
private def lbp (m n : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n + 1 ∧ ∀ k ≤ n, false ∈ p k
private def wf_lbp (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom) : WellFounded (lbp p) :=
⟨by
let ⟨n, pn⟩ := H
suffices ∀ m k, n ≤ k + m → Acc (lbp p) k by exact fun a => this _ _ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
intro m k kn
induction' m with m IH generalizing k <;> refine ⟨_, fun y r => ?_⟩ <;> rcases r with ⟨rfl, a⟩
· injection mem_unique pn.1 (a _ kn)
· exact IH _ (by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; exact kn)⟩
variable (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a subtype. -/
def rfindX : { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } :=
suffices ∀ k, (∀ n < k, false ∈ p n) → { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } from
this 0 fun _ => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim
@WellFounded.fix _ _ (lbp p) (wf_lbp p H)
(by
intro m IH al
have pm : (p m).Dom := by
rcases H with ⟨n, h₁, h₂⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h₃ | h₃ | h₃)
· exact h₂ _ h₃
· rw [h₃]
exact h₁.fst
· injection mem_unique h₁ (al _ h₃)
cases e : (p m).get pm
· suffices ∀ᵉ k ≤ m, false ∈ p k from IH _ ⟨rfl, this⟩ fun n h => this _ (le_of_lt_succ h)
intro n h
rcases h.lt_or_eq_dec with h | h
· exact al _ h
· rw [h]
exact ⟨_, e⟩
· exact ⟨m, ⟨_, e⟩, al⟩)
end Rfind
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfind (p : ℕ →. Bool) : Part ℕ :=
⟨_, fun h => (rfindX p h).1⟩
theorem rfind_spec {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : true ∈ p n :=
h.snd ▸ (rfindX p h.fst).2.1
theorem rfind_min {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
@(h.snd ▸ @((rfindX p h.fst).2.2))
@[simp]
theorem rfind_dom {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → (p m).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
theorem rfind_dom' {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m ≤ n → (p m).Dom :=
exists_congr fun _ =>
and_congr_right fun pn =>
⟨fun H _ h => (Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le h).elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ pn.fst) (H _), fun H _ h =>
H (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_rfind {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} :
n ∈ rfind p ↔ true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
⟨fun h => ⟨rfind_spec h, @rfind_min _ _ h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨_, h₁, fun {m} mn => (h₂ mn).fst⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | h | h)
· injection mem_unique (h₂ h) (rfind_spec hm)
· rwa [← h]
· injection mem_unique h₁ (rfind_min hm h)⟩
theorem rfind_min' {p : ℕ → Bool} {m : ℕ} (pm : p m) : ∃ n ∈ rfind p, n ≤ m :=
have : true ∈ (p : ℕ →. Bool) m := ⟨trivial, pm⟩
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨m, this, fun {_} _ => ⟨⟩⟩
⟨n, hn, not_lt.1 fun h => by injection mem_unique this (rfind_min hn h)⟩
theorem rfind_zero_none (p : ℕ →. Bool) (p0 : p 0 = Part.none) : rfind p = Part.none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h =>
let ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := rfind_dom'.1 h.fst
(p0 ▸ h₂ (zero_le _) : (@Part.none Bool).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `f n`, where all `f k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfindOpt {α} (f : ℕ → Option α) : Part α :=
(rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).bind fun n => f n
theorem rfindOpt_spec {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} {a} (h : a ∈ rfindOpt f) : ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
let ⟨n, _, h₂⟩ := mem_bind_iff.1 h
⟨n, mem_coe.1 h₂⟩
theorem rfindOpt_dom {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} : (rfindOpt f).Dom ↔ ∃ n a, a ∈ f n :=
⟨fun h => (rfindOpt_spec ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp fun _ h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun h => by
have h' : ∃ n, (f n).isSome := h.imp fun n => Option.isSome_iff_exists.2
have s := Nat.find_spec h'
have fd : (rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).Dom :=
⟨Nat.find h', by simpa using s.symm, fun _ _ => trivial⟩
refine ⟨fd, ?_⟩
have := rfind_spec (get_mem fd)
simpa using this⟩
theorem rfindOpt_mono {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} (H : ∀ {a m n}, m ≤ n → a ∈ f m → a ∈ f n) {a} :
a ∈ rfindOpt f ↔ ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
⟨rfindOpt_spec, fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
have h' := rfindOpt_dom.2 ⟨_, _, h⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := rfindOpt_spec ⟨h', rfl⟩
have := (H (le_max_left _ _) h).symm.trans (H (le_max_right _ _) hk)
simp at this; simp [this, get_mem]⟩
/-- `Partrec f` means that the partial function `f : ℕ → ℕ` is partially recursive. -/
inductive Partrec : (ℕ →. ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Partrec (pure 0)
| succ : Partrec succ
| left : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => pair <$> f n <*> g n
| comp {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => g n >>= f
| prec {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec (unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (f a) fun y IH => do let i ← IH; g (pair a (pair y i)))
| rfind {f} : Partrec f → Partrec fun a => rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (pair a n)
namespace Partrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : ℕ →. ℕ} {g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Partrec g :=
hf.of_eq fun n => eq_some_iff.2 (H n)
theorem of_primrec {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Partrec f := by
induction hf with
| zero => exact zero
| succ => exact succ
| left => exact left
| right => exact right
| pair _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.pair pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp [Seq.seq]
| comp _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.comp pg).of_eq_tot fun n => (by simp)
| prec _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.prec pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp only [unpaired, PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind]
induction n.unpair.2 with
| zero => simp
| succ m IH =>
simp only [mem_bind_iff, mem_some_iff]
exact ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩
protected theorem some : Partrec some :=
of_primrec Primrec.id
theorem none : Partrec fun _ => none :=
(of_primrec (Nat.Primrec.const 1)).rfind.of_eq fun _ =>
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => by simp at h
theorem prec' {f g h} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g) (hh : Partrec h) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind fun n => n.rec (g a)
fun y IH => do {let i ← IH; h (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))} :=
((prec hg hh).comp (pair Partrec.some hf)).of_eq fun a =>
ext fun s => by simp [Seq.seq]
theorem ppred : Partrec fun n => ppred n :=
have : Primrec₂ fun n m => if n = Nat.succ m then 0 else 1 :=
(Primrec.ite
(@PrimrecRel.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Primrec.eq Primrec.fst (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp Primrec.snd))
(_root_.Primrec.const 0) (_root_.Primrec.const 1)).to₂
(of_primrec (Primrec₂.unpaired'.2 this)).rfind.of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
· exact
eq_none_iff.2 fun a ⟨⟨m, h, _⟩, _⟩ => by
| simp [show 0 ≠ m.succ by intro h; injection h] at h
· refine eq_some_iff.2 ?_
simp only [mem_rfind, not_true, IsEmpty.forall_iff, decide_true, mem_some_iff,
false_eq_decide_iff, true_and]
intro m h
simp [ne_of_gt h]
end Partrec
end Nat
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α →. σ) :=
Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := α) n) fun a => (f a).map encode
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
| Mathlib/Computability/Partrec.lean | 214 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Inversion.Basic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.PerpBisector
/-!
# Image of a hyperplane under inversion
In this file we prove that the inversion with center `c` and radius `R ≠ 0` maps a sphere passing
through the center to a hyperplane, and vice versa. More precisely, it maps a sphere with center
`y ≠ c` and radius `dist y c` to the hyperplane
`AffineSubspace.perpBisector c (EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R y)`.
The exact statements are a little more complicated because `EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R` sends
the center to itself, not to a point at infinity.
We also prove that the inversion sends an affine subspace passing through the center to itself.
## Keywords
inversion
-/
open Metric Function AffineMap Set AffineSubspace
open scoped Topology
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {c x y : P} {R : ℝ}
namespace EuclideanGeometry
/-- The inversion with center `c` and radius `R` maps a sphere passing through the center to a
hyperplane. -/
| theorem inversion_mem_perpBisector_inversion_iff (hR : R ≠ 0) (hx : x ≠ c) (hy : y ≠ c) :
inversion c R x ∈ perpBisector c (inversion c R y) ↔ dist x y = dist y c := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_dist_eq, dist_inversion_inversion hx hy, dist_inversion_center]
have hx' := dist_ne_zero.2 hx
have hy' := dist_ne_zero.2 hy
-- takes 300ms, but the "equivalent" simp call fails -> hard to speed up
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Inversion/ImageHyperplane.lean | 37 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀ S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀ S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀ S :=
le_sSup tS
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀ t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀ s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃₀ T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ ∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnionPowersetGI :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias sUnion_powerset_gi := sUnionPowersetGI
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀ S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀ s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀ s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋃₀ S ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀ T :=
sSup_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ (s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀ s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀ {s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀ (f '' s) = ⋃ a ∈ s, f a :=
sSup_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, f a :=
sInf_image
@[simp]
lemma sUnion_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋃₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋃ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sSup_image2
@[simp]
lemma sInter_image2 (f : α → β → Set γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ (image2 f s t) = ⋂ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ t), f a b := sInf_image2
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀ range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀ S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀ S), compl_sUnion]
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀ (compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀ S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := x
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
alias sInter_mono := sInter_subset_sInter
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
theorem iUnion_insert_eq_range_union_iUnion {ι : Type*} (x : ι → β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, insert (x i) (t i) = range x ∪ ⋃ i, t i := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union_distrib, union_comm, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀ s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀ s ∩ ⋃₀ t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀ s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀ C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf i ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
lemma biUnion_lt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_lt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_le_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_le_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_lt_eq_iInter [LT α] [NoMaxOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m < n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_lt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_le_eq_iInter [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≤ n), s m = ⋂ (n), s n := biInf_le_eq_iInf
lemma biUnion_gt_eq_iUnion [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_gt_eq_iSup
lemma biUnion_ge_eq_iUnion [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋃ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋃ n, s n := biSup_ge_eq_iSup
lemma biInter_gt_eq_iInf [LT α] [NoMinOrder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m > n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_gt_eq_iInf
lemma biInter_ge_eq_iInf [Preorder α] {s : α → Set β} :
⋂ (n) (m ≥ n), s m = ⋂ n, s n := biInf_ge_eq_iInf
section le
variable {ι : Type*} [PartialOrder ι] (s : ι → Set α) (i : ι)
theorem biUnion_le : (⋃ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋃ j < i, s j) ∪ s i :=
biSup_le_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_le : (⋂ j ≤ i, s j) = (⋂ j < i, s j) ∩ s i :=
biInf_le_eq_inf s i
theorem biUnion_ge : (⋃ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∪ ⋃ j > i, s j :=
biSup_ge_eq_sup s i
theorem biInter_ge : (⋂ j ≥ i, s j) = s i ∩ ⋂ j > i, s j :=
biInf_ge_eq_inf s i
end le
section Pi
variable {π : α → Type*}
theorem pi_def (i : Set α) (s : ∀ a, Set (π a)) : pi i s = ⋂ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' s a := by
ext
simp
theorem univ_pi_eq_iInter (t : ∀ i, Set (π i)) : pi univ t = ⋂ i, eval i ⁻¹' t i := by
simp only [pi_def, iInter_true, mem_univ]
theorem pi_diff_pi_subset (i : Set α) (s t : ∀ a, Set (π a)) :
pi i s \ pi i t ⊆ ⋃ a ∈ i, eval a ⁻¹' (s a \ t a) := by
refine diff_subset_comm.2 fun x hx a ha => ?_
simp only [mem_diff, mem_pi, mem_iUnion, not_exists, mem_preimage, not_and, not_not,
eval_apply] at hx
exact hx.2 _ ha (hx.1 _ ha)
theorem iUnion_univ_pi {ι : α → Type*} (t : (a : α) → ι a → Set (π a)) :
⋃ x : (a : α) → ι a, pi univ (fun a => t a (x a)) = pi univ fun a => ⋃ j : ι a, t a j := by
ext
simp [Classical.skolem]
end Pi
section Directed
theorem directedOn_iUnion {r} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f)
(h : ∀ x, DirectedOn r (f x)) : DirectedOn r (⋃ x, f x) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂ =>
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂
let ⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂)
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
theorem directedOn_sUnion {r} {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(h : ∀ x ∈ S, DirectedOn r x) : DirectedOn r (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact directedOn_iUnion (directedOn_iff_directed.mp hd) (fun i ↦ h i.1 i.2)
theorem pairwise_iUnion₂ {S : Set (Set α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s ∈ S, s.Pairwise r) : (⋃ s ∈ S, s).Pairwise r := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro x S hS hx y T hT hy hne
obtain ⟨U, hU, hSU, hTU⟩ := hd S hS T hT
exact h U hU (hSU hx) (hTU hy) hne
end Directed
end Set
namespace Function
namespace Surjective
theorem iUnion_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋃ x, g (f x) = ⋃ y, g y :=
hf.iSup_comp g
theorem iInter_comp {f : ι → ι₂} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι₂ → Set α) : ⋂ x, g (f x) = ⋂ y, g y :=
hf.iInf_comp g
end Surjective
end Function
/-!
### Disjoint sets
-/
section Disjoint
variable {s t : Set α}
namespace Set
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_left {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint (s i) t :=
iSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_iUnion_right {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} :
Disjoint t (⋃ i, s i) ↔ ∀ i, Disjoint t (s i) :=
disjoint_iSup_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_left {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint (s i j) t :=
iSup₂_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iUnion₂_right {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
Disjoint s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, Disjoint s (t i j) :=
disjoint_iSup₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_left {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} :
Disjoint (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
sSup_disjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_sUnion_right {s : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} :
Disjoint s (⋃₀ S) ↔ ∀ t ∈ S, Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_sSup_iff
lemma biUnion_compl_eq_of_pairwise_disjoint_of_iUnion_eq_univ {ι : Type*} {Es : ι → Set α}
(Es_union : ⋃ i, Es i = univ) (Es_disj : Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (Es i) (Es j))
(I : Set ι) :
(⋃ i ∈ I, Es i)ᶜ = ⋃ i ∈ Iᶜ, Es i := by
ext x
obtain ⟨i, hix⟩ : ∃ i, x ∈ Es i := by simp [← mem_iUnion, Es_union]
have obs : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ ⋃ j ∈ J, Es j ↔ i ∈ J := by
refine fun J ↦ ⟨?_, fun i_in_J ↦ by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using ⟨i, i_in_J, hix⟩⟩
intro x_in_U
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at x_in_U
obtain ⟨j, j_in_J, hjx⟩ := x_in_U
rwa [show i = j by by_contra i_ne_j; exact Disjoint.ne_of_mem (Es_disj i_ne_j) hix hjx rfl]
have obs' : ∀ (J : Set ι), x ∈ (⋃ j ∈ J, Es j)ᶜ ↔ i ∉ J :=
fun J ↦ by simpa only [mem_compl_iff, not_iff_not] using obs J
rw [obs, obs', mem_compl_iff]
end Set
end Disjoint
/-! ### Intervals -/
namespace Set
lemma nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Iic (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddBelow (range f) := by
have : (⋂ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = lowerBounds (range f) := by
ext c; simp [lowerBounds]
simp [this, BddBelow]
lemma nonempty_iInter_Ici_iff [Preorder α] {f : ι → α} :
(⋂ i, Ici (f i)).Nonempty ↔ BddAbove (range f) :=
nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
variable [CompleteLattice α]
theorem Ici_iSup (f : ι → α) : Ici (⨆ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Ici (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Ici, iSup_le_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Iic_iInf (f : ι → α) : Iic (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, Iic (f i) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_Iic, le_iInf_iff, mem_iInter]
theorem Ici_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Ici (⨆ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Ici (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Ici_iSup]
theorem Iic_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → α) : Iic (⨅ (i) (j), f i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), Iic (f i j) := by
simp_rw [Iic_iInf]
theorem Ici_sSup (s : Set α) : Ici (sSup s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Ici a := by rw [sSup_eq_iSup, Ici_iSup₂]
theorem Iic_sInf (s : Set α) : Iic (sInf s) = ⋂ a ∈ s, Iic a := by rw [sInf_eq_iInf, Iic_iInf₂]
end Set
namespace Set
variable (t : α → Set β)
theorem biUnion_diff_biUnion_subset (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
((⋃ x ∈ s₁, t x) \ ⋃ x ∈ s₂, t x) ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s₁ \ s₂, t x := by
simp only [diff_subset_iff, ← biUnion_union]
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
rw [union_diff_self]
apply subset_union_right
/-- If `t` is an indexed family of sets, then there is a natural map from `Σ i, t i` to `⋃ i, t i`
sending `⟨i, x⟩` to `x`. -/
def sigmaToiUnion (x : Σi, t i) : ⋃ i, t i :=
⟨x.2, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x.1, x.2.2⟩⟩
theorem sigmaToiUnion_surjective : Surjective (sigmaToiUnion t)
| ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
have : ∃ a, b ∈ t a := by simpa using hb
let ⟨a, hb⟩ := this
| ⟨⟨a, b, hb⟩, rfl⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,301 | 1,301 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 285 | 285 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Siddhartha Prasad, Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Siddhartha Prasad, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Kleene Algebras
This file defines idempotent semirings and Kleene algebras, which are used extensively in the theory
of computation.
An idempotent semiring is a semiring whose addition is idempotent. An idempotent semiring is
naturally a semilattice by setting `a ≤ b` if `a + b = b`.
A Kleene algebra is an idempotent semiring equipped with an additional unary operator `∗`, the
Kleene star.
## Main declarations
* `IdemSemiring`: Idempotent semiring
* `IdemCommSemiring`: Idempotent commutative semiring
* `KleeneAlgebra`: Kleene algebra
## Notation
`a∗` is notation for `kstar a` in locale `Computability`.
## References
* [D. Kozen, *A completeness theorem for Kleene algebras and the algebra of regular events*]
[kozen1994]
* https://planetmath.org/idempotentsemiring
* https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/Idempotent_semi-ring
* https://planetmath.org/kleene_algebra
## TODO
Instances for `AddOpposite`, `MulOpposite`, `ULift`, `Subsemiring`, `Subring`, `Subalgebra`.
## Tags
kleene algebra, idempotent semiring
-/
open Function
universe u
variable {α β ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- An idempotent semiring is a semiring with the additional property that addition is idempotent.
-/
class IdemSemiring (α : Type u) extends Semiring α, SemilatticeSup α where
protected sup := (· + ·)
protected add_eq_sup : ∀ a b : α, a + b = a ⊔ b := by
intros
rfl
/-- The bottom element of an idempotent semiring: `0` by default -/
protected bot : α := 0
protected bot_le : ∀ a, bot ≤ a
/-- An idempotent commutative semiring is a commutative semiring with the additional property that
addition is idempotent. -/
class IdemCommSemiring (α : Type u) extends CommSemiring α, IdemSemiring α
/-- Notation typeclass for the Kleene star `∗`. -/
class KStar (α : Type*) where
/-- The Kleene star operator on a Kleene algebra -/
protected kstar : α → α
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Computability] postfix:1024 "∗" => KStar.kstar
open Computability
/-- A Kleene Algebra is an idempotent semiring with an additional unary operator `kstar` (for Kleene
star) that satisfies the following properties:
* `1 + a * a∗ ≤ a∗`
* `1 + a∗ * a ≤ a∗`
* If `a * c + b ≤ c`, then `a∗ * b ≤ c`
* If `c * a + b ≤ c`, then `b * a∗ ≤ c`
-/
class KleeneAlgebra (α : Type*) extends IdemSemiring α, KStar α where
protected one_le_kstar : ∀ a : α, 1 ≤ a∗
protected mul_kstar_le_kstar : ∀ a : α, a * a∗ ≤ a∗
protected kstar_mul_le_kstar : ∀ a : α, a∗ * a ≤ a∗
protected mul_kstar_le_self : ∀ a b : α, b * a ≤ b → b * a∗ ≤ b
protected kstar_mul_le_self : ∀ a b : α, a * b ≤ b → a∗ * b ≤ b
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IdemSemiring.toOrderBot [IdemSemiring α] : OrderBot α :=
{ ‹IdemSemiring α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct an idempotent semiring from an idempotent addition. -/
abbrev IdemSemiring.ofSemiring [Semiring α] (h : ∀ a : α, a + a = a) : IdemSemiring α :=
{ ‹Semiring α› with
le := fun a b ↦ a + b = b
le_refl := h
le_trans := fun a b c hab hbc ↦ by
rw [← hbc, ← add_assoc, hab]
le_antisymm := fun a b hab hba ↦ by rwa [← hba, add_comm]
sup := (· + ·)
le_sup_left := fun a b ↦ by
rw [← add_assoc, h]
le_sup_right := fun a b ↦ by
rw [add_comm, add_assoc, h]
sup_le := fun a b c hab hbc ↦ by
rwa [add_assoc, hbc]
bot := 0
bot_le := zero_add }
section IdemSemiring
variable [IdemSemiring α] {a b c : α}
theorem add_eq_sup (a b : α) : a + b = a ⊔ b :=
IdemSemiring.add_eq_sup _ _
scoped[Computability] attribute [simp] add_eq_sup
theorem add_idem (a : α) : a + a = a := by simp
lemma natCast_eq_one {n : ℕ} (nezero : n ≠ 0) : (n : α) = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at nezero
induction n, nezero using Nat.le_induction with
| base => exact Nat.cast_one
| succ x _ hx => rw [Nat.cast_add, hx, Nat.cast_one, add_idem 1]
lemma ofNat_eq_one {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : α) = 1 :=
natCast_eq_one <| Nat.ne_zero_of_lt Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop
theorem nsmul_eq_self : ∀ {n : ℕ} (_ : n ≠ 0) (a : α), n • a = a
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| 1, _ => one_nsmul
| n + 2, _ => fun a ↦ by rw [succ_nsmul, nsmul_eq_self n.succ_ne_zero, add_idem]
theorem add_eq_left_iff_le : a + b = a ↔ b ≤ a := by simp
theorem add_eq_right_iff_le : a + b = b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp
alias ⟨_, LE.le.add_eq_left⟩ := add_eq_left_iff_le
alias ⟨_, LE.le.add_eq_right⟩ := add_eq_right_iff_le
theorem add_le_iff : a + b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c := by simp
| theorem add_le (ha : a ≤ c) (hb : b ≤ c) : a + b ≤ c :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Kleene.lean | 154 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
/-!
# Specific subobjects
We define `equalizerSubobject`, `kernelSubobject` and `imageSubobject`, which are the subobjects
represented by the equalizer, kernel and image of (a pair of) morphism(s) and provide conditions
for `P.factors f`, where `P` is one of these special subobjects.
TODO: Add conditions for when `P` is a pullback subobject.
TODO: an iff characterisation of `(imageSubobject f).Factors h`
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
section Equalizer
variable (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasEqualizer f g]
/-- The equalizer of morphisms `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev equalizerSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (equalizer.ι f g)
/-- The underlying object of `equalizerSubobject f g` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `equalizer f g`. -/
def equalizerSubobjectIso : (equalizerSubobject f g : C) ≅ equalizer f g :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (equalizer.ι f g)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).hom ≫ equalizer.ι f g = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow' :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).inv ≫ (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow = equalizer.ι f g := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp :
(equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ f = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ g := by
rw [← equalizerSubobject_arrow, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, equalizer.condition]
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h :=
⟨equalizer.lift h w, by simp⟩
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = h ≫ g :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp,
Category.assoc],
equalizerSubobject_factors f g h⟩
end Equalizer
section Kernel
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev kernelSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f)
/-- The underlying object of `kernelSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `kernel f`. -/
def kernelSubobjectIso : (kernelSubobject f : C) ≅ kernel f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (kernel.ι f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ kernel.ι f = (kernelSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow' :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = kernel.ι f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow_comp : (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [← kernelSubobject_arrow]
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.condition, comp_zero]
theorem kernelSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h :=
⟨kernel.lift _ h w, by simp⟩
theorem kernelSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = 0 :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, kernelSubobject_arrow_comp,
comp_zero],
kernelSubobject_factors f h⟩
/-- A factorisation of `h : W ⟶ X` through `kernelSubobject f`, assuming `h ≫ f = 0`. -/
def factorThruKernelSubobject {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernelSubobject f :=
(kernelSubobject f).factorThru h (kernelSubobject_factors f h w)
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_arrow {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = h := by
dsimp [factorThruKernelSubobject]
simp
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_kernelSubobjectIso {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso f).hom = kernel.lift f h w :=
(cancel_mono (kernel.ι f)).1 <| by simp
section
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} [HasKernel f']
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism between the kernel subobjects. -/
def kernelSubobjectMap (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
(kernelSubobject f : C) ⟶ (kernelSubobject f' : C) :=
Subobject.factorThru _ ((kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left)
(kernelSubobject_factors _ _ (by simp [sq.w]))
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_arrow (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobject f').arrow = (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left := by
simp [kernelSubobjectMap]
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_id : kernelSubobjectMap (𝟙 (Arrow.mk f)) = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_comp {X'' Y'' : C} {f'' : X'' ⟶ Y''} [HasKernel f'']
(sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') (sq' : Arrow.mk f' ⟶ Arrow.mk f'') :
kernelSubobjectMap (sq ≫ sq') = kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ kernelSubobjectMap sq' := by
aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
theorem kernel_map_comp_kernelSubobjectIso_inv (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernel.map f f' sq.1 sq.2 sq.3.symm ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).inv =
(kernelSubobjectIso _).inv ≫ kernelSubobjectMap sq := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc]
theorem kernelSubobjectIso_comp_kernel_map (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
| (kernelSubobjectIso _).hom ≫ kernel.map f f' sq.1 sq.2 sq.3.symm =
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso _).hom := by
simp [← Iso.comp_inv_eq, kernel_map_comp_kernelSubobjectIso_inv]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Limits.lean | 158 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.List
/-!
# Countable sets
In this file we define `Set.Countable s` as `Countable s`
and prove basic properties of this definition.
Note that this definition does not provide a computable encoding.
For a noncomputable conversion to `Encodable s`, use `Set.Countable.nonempty_encodable`.
## Keywords
sets, countable set
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Multiset.sort
noncomputable section
open Function Set Encodable
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
namespace Set
/-- A set `s` is countable if the corresponding subtype is countable,
i.e., there exists an injective map `f : s → ℕ`.
Note that this is an abbreviation, so `hs : Set.Countable s` in the proof context
is the same as an instance `Countable s`.
For a constructive version, see `Encodable`.
-/
protected def Countable (s : Set α) : Prop := Countable s
@[simp]
theorem countable_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Countable s ↔ s.Countable := .rfl
/-- Prove `Set.Countable` from a `Countable` instance on the subtype. -/
theorem to_countable (s : Set α) [Countable s] : s.Countable := ‹_›
/-- Restate `Set.Countable` as a `Countable` instance. -/
alias ⟨_root_.Countable.to_set, Countable.to_subtype⟩ := countable_coe_iff
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_injective {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : s → ℕ, Injective f :=
countable_iff_exists_injective s
/-- A set `s : Set α` is countable if and only if there exists a function `α → ℕ` injective
on `s`. -/
theorem countable_iff_exists_injOn {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : α → ℕ, InjOn f s :=
Set.countable_iff_exists_injective.trans exists_injOn_iff_injective.symm
theorem countable_iff_nonempty_encodable {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ Nonempty (Encodable s) :=
Encodable.nonempty_encodable.symm
alias ⟨Countable.nonempty_encodable, _⟩ := countable_iff_nonempty_encodable
/-- Convert `Set.Countable s` to `Encodable s` (noncomputable). -/
protected def Countable.toEncodable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : Encodable s :=
Classical.choice hs.nonempty_encodable
section Enumerate
/-- Noncomputably enumerate elements in a set. The `default` value is used to extend the domain to
all of `ℕ`. -/
def enumerateCountable {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) : ℕ → α := fun n =>
match @Encodable.decode s h.toEncodable n with
| some y => y
| none => default
theorem subset_range_enumerate {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) :
s ⊆ range (enumerateCountable h default) := fun x hx =>
⟨@Encodable.encode s h.toEncodable ⟨x, hx⟩, by
letI := h.toEncodable
simp [enumerateCountable, Encodable.encodek]⟩
lemma range_enumerateCountable_subset {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) :
range (enumerateCountable h default) ⊆ insert default s := by
refine range_subset_iff.mpr (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [enumerateCountable]
match @decode s (Countable.toEncodable h) n with
| none => exact mem_insert _ _
| some val => simp
lemma range_enumerateCountable_of_mem {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) {default : α}
(h_mem : default ∈ s) :
range (enumerateCountable h default) = s :=
subset_antisymm ((range_enumerateCountable_subset h _).trans_eq (insert_eq_of_mem h_mem))
(subset_range_enumerate h default)
lemma enumerateCountable_mem {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) {default : α} (h_mem : default ∈ s)
(n : ℕ) :
enumerateCountable h default n ∈ s := by
convert mem_range_self n
exact (range_enumerateCountable_of_mem h h_mem).symm
end Enumerate
theorem Countable.mono {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs : s₂.Countable) : s₁.Countable :=
have := hs.to_subtype; (inclusion_injective h).countable
theorem countable_range [Countable ι] (f : ι → β) : (range f).Countable :=
surjective_onto_range.countable.to_set
theorem countable_iff_exists_subset_range [Nonempty α] {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → α, s ⊆ range f :=
⟨fun h => by
inhabit α
exact ⟨enumerateCountable h default, subset_range_enumerate _ _⟩, fun ⟨f, hsf⟩ =>
(countable_range f).mono hsf⟩
/-- A non-empty set is countable iff there exists a surjection from the
natural numbers onto the subtype induced by the set.
-/
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_surjective {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → s, Surjective f :=
@countable_iff_exists_surjective s hs.to_subtype
alias ⟨Countable.exists_surjective, _⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective
theorem countable_univ_iff : (univ : Set α).Countable ↔ Countable α :=
countable_coe_iff.symm.trans (Equiv.Set.univ _).countable_iff
theorem countable_univ [Countable α] : (univ : Set α).Countable :=
to_countable univ
theorem not_countable_univ_iff : ¬ (univ : Set α).Countable ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [countable_univ_iff, not_countable_iff]
theorem not_countable_univ [Uncountable α] : ¬ (univ : Set α).Countable :=
not_countable_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
/-- If `s : Set α` is a nonempty countable set, then there exists a map
`f : ℕ → α` such that `s = range f`. -/
theorem Countable.exists_eq_range {s : Set α} (hc : s.Countable) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, s = range f := by
rcases hc.exists_surjective hs with ⟨f, hf⟩
refine ⟨(↑) ∘ f, ?_⟩
rw [hf.range_comp, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp] theorem countable_empty : (∅ : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
@[simp] theorem countable_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
theorem Countable.image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Countable := by
rw [image_eq_range]
have := hs.to_subtype
apply countable_range
theorem MapsTo.countable_of_injOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : MapsTo f s t)
(hf' : InjOn f s) (ht : t.Countable) : s.Countable :=
have := ht.to_subtype
have : Injective (hf.restrict f s t) := (injOn_iff_injective.1 hf').codRestrict _
this.countable
theorem Countable.preimage_of_injOn {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : (f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
(mapsTo_preimage f s).countable_of_injOn hf hs
protected theorem Countable.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
hs.preimage_of_injOn hf.injOn
theorem exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable [CompleteLattice α] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ x, p x) :
(∃ s : ℕ → α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⨆ n, s n = ⊤) ↔
∃ S : Set α, S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ sSup S = ⊤ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hps, hs⟩
refine ⟨range s, countable_range s, forall_mem_range.2 hps, ?_⟩
rwa [sSup_range]
· rintro ⟨S, hSc, hps, hS⟩
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty S with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sSup_empty] at hS
haveI := subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top hS
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨fun _ => x, fun _ => hx, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· rcases (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective hne).1 hSc with ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n, fun n => hps _ (s n).coe_prop, ?_⟩
rwa [hs.iSup_comp, ← sSup_eq_iSup']
theorem exists_seq_cover_iff_countable {p : Set α → Prop} (h : ∃ s, p s) :
| (∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ) ↔
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ ⋃₀ S = univ :=
exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable h
theorem countable_of_injective_of_countable_image {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : InjOn f s)
(hs : (f '' s).Countable) : s.Countable :=
(mapsTo_image _ _).countable_of_injOn hf hs
theorem countable_iUnion {t : ι → Set α} [Countable ι] (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Countable) :
(⋃ i, t i).Countable := by
have := fun i ↦ (ht i).to_subtype
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply countable_range
@[simp]
theorem countable_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] {t : ι → Set α} :
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Countable.lean | 193 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Induction
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Span
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.Successor
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Nobeling.ZeroLimit
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 1,337 | 1,339 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Arthur Paulino. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Graph Coloring
This module defines colorings of simple graphs (also known as proper colorings in the literature).
A graph coloring is the attribution of "colors" to all of its vertices such that adjacent vertices
have different colors.
A coloring can be represented as a homomorphism into a complete graph, whose vertices represent
the colors.
## Main definitions
* `G.Coloring α` is the type of `α`-colorings of a simple graph `G`,
with `α` being the set of available colors. The type is defined to
be homomorphisms from `G` into the complete graph on `α`, and
colorings have a coercion to `V → α`.
* `G.Colorable n` is the proposition that `G` is `n`-colorable, which
is whether there exists a coloring with at most *n* colors.
* `G.chromaticNumber` is the minimal `n` such that `G` is `n`-colorable,
or `⊤` if it cannot be colored with finitely many colors.
(Cardinal-valued chromatic numbers are more niche, so we stick to `ℕ∞`.)
We write `G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤` to mean a graph is colorable with finitely many colors.
* `C.colorClass c` is the set of vertices colored by `c : α` in the coloring `C : G.Coloring α`.
* `C.colorClasses` is the set containing all color classes.
## TODO
* Gather material from:
* https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/blob/simple_graph_matching/src/combinatorics/simple_graph/coloring.lean
* https://github.com/kmill/lean-graphcoloring/blob/master/src/graph.lean
* Trees
* Planar graphs
* Chromatic polynomials
* develop API for partial colorings, likely as colorings of subgraphs (`H.coe.Coloring α`)
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Fintype Function
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {n : ℕ}
/-- An `α`-coloring of a simple graph `G` is a homomorphism of `G` into the complete graph on `α`.
This is also known as a proper coloring.
-/
abbrev Coloring (α : Type v) := G →g (⊤ : SimpleGraph α)
variable {G}
variable {α β : Type*} (C : G.Coloring α)
theorem Coloring.valid {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) : C v ≠ C w :=
C.map_rel h
/-- Construct a term of `SimpleGraph.Coloring` using a function that
assigns vertices to colors and a proof that it is as proper coloring.
(Note: this is a definitionally the constructor for `SimpleGraph.Hom`,
but with a syntactically better proper coloring hypothesis.)
-/
@[match_pattern]
def Coloring.mk (color : V → α) (valid : ∀ {v w : V}, G.Adj v w → color v ≠ color w) :
G.Coloring α :=
⟨color, @valid⟩
/-- The color class of a given color.
-/
def Coloring.colorClass (c : α) : Set V := { v : V | C v = c }
/-- The set containing all color classes. -/
def Coloring.colorClasses : Set (Set V) := (Setoid.ker C).classes
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClass (v : V) : v ∈ C.colorClass (C v) := rfl
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition : Setoid.IsPartition C.colorClasses :=
Setoid.isPartition_classes (Setoid.ker C)
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClasses {v : V} : C.colorClass (C v) ∈ C.colorClasses :=
⟨v, rfl⟩
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_finite [Finite α] : C.colorClasses.Finite :=
Setoid.finite_classes_ker _
theorem Coloring.card_colorClasses_le [Fintype α] [Fintype C.colorClasses] :
Fintype.card C.colorClasses ≤ Fintype.card α := by
simp only [colorClasses]
convert Setoid.card_classes_ker_le C
theorem Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass {c : α} {v w : V} (hv : v ∈ C.colorClass c)
(hw : w ∈ C.colorClass c) : ¬G.Adj v w := fun h => C.valid h (Eq.trans hv (Eq.symm hw))
theorem Coloring.color_classes_independent (c : α) : IsAntichain G.Adj (C.colorClass c) :=
fun _ hv _ hw _ => C.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass hv hw
|
-- TODO make this computable
noncomputable instance [Fintype V] [Fintype α] : Fintype (Coloring G α) := by
classical
change Fintype (RelHom G.Adj (⊤ : SimpleGraph α).Adj)
apply Fintype.ofInjective _ RelHom.coe_fn_injective
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Coloring.lean | 115 | 120 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
|
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 766 | 773 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
- Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
- Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : α ⊕ (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {f : t.varFinset → β}
{v : β → M} (v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(t.restrictVar f).realize v = t.realize v' := by
induction t with
| var => simp [restrictVar, hv']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i ((by simp [Function.comp_apply, hv'])))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar' [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v :=
realize_restrictVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)}
{f : t.varFinsetLeft → β}
{xs : β ⊕ γ → M} (xs' : α → M) (hxs' : ∀ a, xs (Sum.inl (f a)) = xs' a) :
(t.restrictVarLeft f).realize xs = t.realize (Sum.elim xs' (xs ∘ Sum.inr)) := by
induction t with
| var a => cases a <;> simp [restrictVarLeft, hxs']
| func _ _ ih =>
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (by simp [hxs']))
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictVarLeft`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft' [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (α ⊕ γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
realize_restrictVarLeft _ (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => simp
| @func n f ts ih =>
cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· obtain - | f := f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, constantsToVars]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (α ⊕ β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction t with
| var ab => rcases ab with a | b <;> simp [Language.con]
| func f ts ih =>
simp only [realize, constantsOn, constantsOnFunc, ih, varsToConstants]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sumInl]
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func f ts ih => simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem HomClass.realize_term {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [HomClass L F M N]
(g : F) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, HomClass.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, max, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{v' : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs : Fin n → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs) = t.realize (Sum.elim v xs))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).Realize v' xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, id]
theorem realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe [L'.Structure M] {k : ℕ}
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n)) → L'.Term (β ⊕ (Fin (k + n)))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
(v : ∀ {n}, (Fin (k + n) → M) → α → M) {v' : β → M} (xs : Fin (k + n) → M)
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (α ⊕ (Fin n))) (xs' : Fin (k + n) → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs') = t.realize (Sum.elim (v xs') (xs' ∘ Fin.natAdd _)))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x)
(hv : ∀ (n) (xs : Fin (k + n) → M) (x : M), @v (n + 1) (snoc xs x : Fin _ → M) = v xs) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => castLE (add_assoc _ _ _).symm.le).Realize v' xs ↔
φ.Realize (v xs) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd _) := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
| all _ ih => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, hv]
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {m n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {g : α → β ⊕ (Fin m)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (m + n) → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ Fin.castAdd n) ∘ g) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd m) := by
apply realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + n') → M}
(hmn : m + n' ≤ n + 1) :
(φ.liftAt n' m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') := by
rw [liftAt]
induction φ with
| falsum => simp [mapTermRel, Realize]
| equal => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| rel => simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 => simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1 hmn, ih2 hmn]
| @all k _ ih3 =>
have h : k + 1 + n' = k + n' + 1 := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1 n', ← add_assoc]
simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_castLE_of_eq h, ih3 (hmn.trans k.succ.le_succ)]
refine forall_congr' fun x => iff_eq_eq.mpr (congr rfl (funext (Fin.lastCases ?_ fun i => ?_)))
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, val_last, snoc_last]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
split_ifs <;> dsimp; omega
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, Fin.snoc_castSucc]
refine (congr rfl (Fin.ext ?_)).trans (snoc_castSucc _ _ _)
simp only [coe_castSucc, coe_cast]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem realize_liftAt_one {n m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + 1) → M}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(φ.liftAt 1 m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then castSucc i else i.succ) := by
simp [realize_liftAt (add_le_add_right hmn 1), castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin (n + 1) → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ castSucc) := by
rw [realize_liftAt_one (refl n), iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_))
rw [if_pos i.is_lt]
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.subst tf).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (fun a => (tf a).realize v) xs :=
realize_mapTermRel_id
(fun n t x => by
rw [Term.realize_subst]
rcongr a
cases a
· simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Function.comp_apply, Term.realize_relabel, Sum.elim_comp_inl]
· rfl)
(by simp)
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
{f : φ.freeVarFinset → β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(v' : α → M) (hv' : ∀ a, v (f a) = v' a) :
(φ.restrictFreeVar f).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v' xs := by
induction φ with
| falsum => rfl
| equal =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_2]
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv']), realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| rel =>
simp only [Realize, freeVarFinset.eq_3, Finset.biUnion_val, restrictFreeVar]
congr!
rw [realize_restrictVarLeft v' (by simp [hv'])]
simp [Function.comp_apply]
| imp _ _ ih1 ih2 =>
simp only [Realize, restrictFreeVar, freeVarFinset.eq_4]
rw [ih1, ih2] <;> simp [hv']
| all _ ih3 =>
simp only [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
refine forall_congr' (fun _ => ?_)
rw [ih3]; simp [hv']
/-- A special case of `realize_restrictFreeVar`, included because we can add the `simp` attribute
to it -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar' [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑φ.freeVarFinset ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.restrictFreeVar (Set.inclusion h)).Realize (v ∘ (↑)) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs :=
realize_restrictFreeVar _ (by simp)
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquiv [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{n} {φ : L[[α]].BoundedFormula β n} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquiv φ).Realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun n R xs => ?_
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [← (lhomWithConstants L α).map_onRelation
(Equiv.sumEmpty (L.Relations n) ((constantsOn α).Relations n) R) xs]
rcongr
obtain - | R := R
· simp
· exact isEmptyElim R
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabelEquiv {g : α ≃ β} {k} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α k} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin k → M} : (relabelEquiv g φ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) xs := by
simp only [relabelEquiv, mapTermRelEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl]
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => ?_) fun _ _ _ => rfl
simp only [relabelEquiv_apply, Term.realize_relabel]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) rfl
ext (i | i) <;> rfl
variable [Nonempty M]
theorem realize_all_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).all.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
inhabit M
simp only [realize_all, realize_liftAt_one_self]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a => ?_⟩
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp (h default)
simp
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp h
| simp
end BoundedFormula
namespace LHom
open BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_onBoundedFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] {n : ℕ}
(ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 473 | 483 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.Span
/-!
# Lie submodules of a Lie algebra
In this file we define Lie submodules, we construct the lattice structure on Lie submodules and we
use it to define various important operations, notably the Lie span of a subset of a Lie module.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule`
* `LieSubmodule.wellFounded_of_noetherian`
* `LieSubmodule.lieSpan`
* `LieSubmodule.map`
* `LieSubmodule.comap`
## Tags
lie algebra, lie submodule, lie ideal, lattice structure
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
section LieSubmodule
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
/-- A Lie submodule of a Lie module is a submodule that is closed under the Lie bracket.
This is a sufficient condition for the subset itself to form a Lie module. -/
structure LieSubmodule extends Submodule R M where
lie_mem : ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ carrier → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ carrier
attribute [nolint docBlame] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
attribute [coe] LieSubmodule.toSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R L M}
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
instance : SetLike (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective' h
instance : AddSubgroupClass (LieSubmodule R L M) M where
add_mem {N} _ _ := N.add_mem'
zero_mem N := N.zero_mem'
neg_mem {N} x hx := show -x ∈ N.toSubmodule from neg_mem hx
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (LieSubmodule R L M) R M where
smul_mem {s} c _ h := s.smul_mem' c h
/-- The zero module is a Lie submodule of any Lie module. -/
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (0 : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by rw [(Submodule.mem_bot R).1 h]; apply lie_zero }⟩
instance : Inhabited (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance (priority := high) coeSort : CoeSort (LieSubmodule R L M) (Type w) where
coe N := { x : M // x ∈ N }
instance (priority := mid) coeSubmodule : CoeOut (LieSubmodule R L M) (Submodule R M) :=
⟨toSubmodule⟩
instance : CanLift (Submodule R M) (LieSubmodule R L M) (·)
(fun N ↦ ∀ {x : L} {m : M}, m ∈ N → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N) where
prf N hN := ⟨⟨N, hN⟩, rfl⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toSubmodule : ((N : Submodule R M) : Set M) = N :=
rfl
theorem mem_carrier {x : M} : x ∈ N.carrier ↔ x ∈ (N : Set M) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mk_iff (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff' (p : Submodule R M) (h) {x : M} :
x ∈ (⟨p, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubmodule {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias mem_coeSubmodule := mem_toSubmodule
theorem mem_coe {x : M} : x ∈ (N : Set M) ↔ x ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : M) ∈ N :=
zero_mem N
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {x} (h : x ∈ N) : (⟨x, h⟩ : N) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext_iff_val
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSet_mk (S : Set M) (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄) :
((⟨⟨⟨⟨S, h₁⟩, h₂⟩, h₃⟩, h₄⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_mk (p : Submodule R M) (h) :
(({ p with lie_mem := h } : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = p := by cases p; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_mk := toSubmodule_mk
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : LieSubmodule R L M → Submodule R M) := fun x y h ↦ by
cases x; cases y; congr
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_injective := toSubmodule_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ m, m ∈ N ↔ m ∈ N') : N = N' :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_inj : (N : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ N = N' :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coe_toSubmodule_inj := toSubmodule_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toSubmodule_eq_iff := toSubmodule_inj
/-- Copy of a `LieSubmodule` with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑N) : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := s
zero_mem' := by simp [hs]
add_mem' x y := by rw [hs] at x y ⊢; exact N.add_mem' x y
smul_mem' := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.smul_mem'
lie_mem := by exact hs.symm ▸ N.lie_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : LieSubmodule R L M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance : LieRingModule L N where
bracket (x : L) (m : N) := ⟨⁅x, m.val⁆, N.lie_mem m.property⟩
add_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply add_lie
lie_add := by intro x m n; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_add
leibniz_lie := by intro x y m; apply SetCoe.ext; apply leibniz_lie
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : N) : M) = (0 : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (m m' : N) : (↑(m + m') : M) = (m : M) + (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (m : N) : (↑(-m) : M) = -(m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (m m' : N) : (↑(m - m') : M) = (m : M) - (m' : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (t : R) (m : N) : (↑(t • m) : M) = t • (m : M) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bracket (x : L) (m : N) :
(↑⁅x, m⁆ : M) = ⁅x, ↑m⁆ :=
rfl
-- Copying instances from `Submodule` for correct discrimination keys
instance [IsNoetherian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsNoetherian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsNoetherian R N.toSubmodule
instance [IsArtinian R M] (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : IsArtinian R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsArtinian R N.toSubmodule
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R N :=
inferInstanceAs <| NoZeroSMulDivisors R N.toSubmodule
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
instance instLieModule : LieModule R L N where
lie_smul := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply lie_smul
smul_lie := by intro t x y; apply SetCoe.ext; apply smul_lie
instance [Subsingleton M] : Unique (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨⟨0⟩, fun _ ↦ (toSubmodule_inj _ _).mp (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
end LieSubmodule
variable {R M}
theorem Submodule.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff (p : Submodule R M) :
(∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p) ↔ ∀ (x : L) (m : M), m ∈ p → ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ p := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨N, rfl⟩ _ _; exact N.lie_mem
· intro h; use { p with lie_mem := @h }
namespace LieSubalgebra
variable {L}
variable [LieAlgebra R L]
variable (K : LieSubalgebra R L)
/-- Given a Lie subalgebra `K ⊆ L`, if we view `L` as a `K`-module by restriction, it contains
a distinguished Lie submodule for the action of `K`, namely `K` itself. -/
def toLieSubmodule : LieSubmodule R K L :=
{ (K : Submodule R L) with lie_mem := fun {x _} hy ↦ K.lie_mem x.property hy }
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLieSubmodule : (K.toLieSubmodule : Submodule R L) = K := rfl
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem mem_toLieSubmodule (x : L) : x ∈ K.toLieSubmodule ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
end LieSubalgebra
end LieSubmodule
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M)
section LatticeStructure
open Set
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : LieSubmodule R L M → Set M) :=
SetLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule : (N : Submodule R M) ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N' :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias coeSubmodule_le_coeSubmodule := toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule
instance : Bot (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instUniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M)
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubmodule : ((⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias bot_coeSubmodule := bot_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_bot : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_bot_iff := toSubmodule_eq_bot
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_bot_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊥ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, bot_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot (x : M) : x ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ x = 0 :=
mem_singleton_iff
instance : Top (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submodule R M) with lie_mem := fun {x m} _ ↦ mem_univ ⁅x, m⁆ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Set M) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : ((⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) : Submodule R M) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias top_coeSubmodule := top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top : (N : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_eq_top_iff := toSubmodule_eq_top
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_top_iff {N : Submodule R M} {h} :
(⟨N, h⟩ : LieSubmodule R L M) = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj, top_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) :=
mem_univ x
instance : Min (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N N' ↦
{ (N ⊓ N' : Submodule R M) with
lie_mem := fun h ↦ mem_inter (N.lie_mem h.1) (N'.lie_mem h.2) }⟩
instance : InfSet (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ toSubmodule := sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S}
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
simp only [Submodule.mem_carrier, mem_iInter, Submodule.sInf_coe, mem_setOf_eq,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, forall_exists_index, and_imp] at h ⊢
intro N hN; apply N.lie_mem (h N hN) }⟩
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : (↑(N ⊓ N') : Set M) = ↑N ∩ ↑N' :=
rfl
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem inf_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊓ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊓ (N' : Submodule R M) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias inf_coe_toSubmodule := inf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = sInf {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule := sInf_toSubmodule
theorem sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sInf S) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sInf_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sInf_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sInf_coe_toSubmodule' := sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨅ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨅ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_toSubmodule]; ext; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iInf_coe_toSubmodule := iInf_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M) := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.coe_toSubmodule, sInf_toSubmodule, Submodule.sInf_coe]
ext m
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp,
and_imp, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_toSubmodule]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
instance : Max (LieSubmodule R L M) where
max N N' :=
{ toSubmodule := (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
lie_mem := by
rintro x m (hm : m ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M))
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M)
rw [Submodule.mem_sup] at hm ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := hm
exact ⟨⁅x, y⁆, N.lie_mem hy, ⁅x, z⁆, N'.lie_mem hz, (lie_add _ _ _).symm⟩ }
instance : SupSet (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sSup S :=
{ toSubmodule := sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
lie_mem := by
intro x m (hm : m ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S})
change ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S}
obtain ⟨s, hs, hsm⟩ := Submodule.mem_sSup_iff_exists_finset.mp hm
clear hm
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on generalizing m with
| empty =>
replace hsm : m = 0 := by simpa using hsm
simp [hsm]
| insert q t hqt ih =>
rw [Finset.iSup_insert] at hsm
obtain ⟨m', hm', u, hu, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp hsm
rw [lie_add]
refine add_mem ?_ (ih (Subset.trans (by simp) hs) hu)
obtain ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ : ∃ p ∈ S, ↑p = q := hs (Finset.mem_insert_self q t)
suffices p ≤ sSup {(p : Submodule R M) | p ∈ S} by exact this (p.lie_mem hm')
exact le_sSup ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem sup_toSubmodule :
(↑(N ⊔ N') : Submodule R M) = (N : Submodule R M) ⊔ (N' : Submodule R M) := by
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sup_coe_toSubmodule := sup_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem sSup_toSubmodule (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = sSup {(s : Submodule R M) | s ∈ S} :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule := sSup_toSubmodule
theorem sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup (S : Set (LieSubmodule R L M)) :
(↑(sSup S) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ N ∈ S, (N : Submodule R M) := by
rw [sSup_toSubmodule, ← Set.image, sSup_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias sSup_coe_toSubmodule' := sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup
@[simp]
theorem iSup_toSubmodule {ι} (p : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(↑(⨆ i, p i) : Submodule R M) = ⨆ i, (p i : Submodule R M) := by
rw [iSup, sSup_toSubmodule]; ext; simp [Submodule.mem_sSup, Submodule.mem_iSup]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias iSup_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_toSubmodule
/-- The set of Lie submodules of a Lie module form a complete lattice. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
{ toSubmodule_injective.completeLattice toSubmodule sup_toSubmodule inf_toSubmodule
sSup_toSubmodule_eq_iSup sInf_toSubmodule_eq_iInf rfl rfl with
toPartialOrder := SetLike.instPartialOrder }
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι} {b : M} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ N i) :
b ∈ ⨆ i, N i :=
(le_iSup N i) h
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma iSup_induction {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : M → Prop} {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (mem : ∀ i, ∀ y ∈ N i, motive y) (zero : motive 0)
(add : ∀ y z, motive y → motive z → motive (y + z)) : motive x := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule] at hx
exact Submodule.iSup_induction (motive := motive) (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) hx mem zero add
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem iSup_induction' {ι} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) {motive : (x : M) → (x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (i) (x) (hx : x ∈ N i), motive x (mem_iSup_of_mem i hx)) (zero : motive 0 (zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, motive x hx → motive y hy → motive (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) : motive x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i) (hc : motive x hx) => hc
refine iSup_induction N (motive := fun x : M ↦ ∃ (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, N i), motive x hx) hx
(fun i x hx => ?_) ?_ fun x y => ?_
· exact ⟨_, mem _ _ hx⟩
· exact ⟨_, zero⟩
· rintro ⟨_, Cx⟩ ⟨_, Cy⟩
exact ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ Cx Cy⟩
variable {N N'}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_toSubmodule :
Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Disjoint N N' := by
rw [disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, inf_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule,
← disjoint_iff]
@[deprecated disjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem disjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Disjoint N N' ↔ Disjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := disjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias disjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := disjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma codisjoint_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ Codisjoint N N' := by
rw [codisjoint_iff, codisjoint_iff, ← toSubmodule_inj, sup_toSubmodule,
top_toSubmodule, ← codisjoint_iff]
@[deprecated codisjoint_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule :
Codisjoint N N' ↔ Codisjoint (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) :=
codisjoint_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias codisjoint_iff_coe_toSubmodule := codisjoint_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma isCompl_toSubmodule :
IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) ↔ IsCompl N N' := by
simp [isCompl_iff]
@[deprecated isCompl_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem isCompl_iff_toSubmodule :
IsCompl N N' ↔ IsCompl (N : Submodule R M) (N' : Submodule R M) := isCompl_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias isCompl_iff_coe_toSubmodule := isCompl_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma iSupIndep_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
iSupIndep (fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M)) ↔ iSupIndep N := by
simp [iSupIndep_def, ← disjoint_toSubmodule]
@[deprecated iSupIndep_toSubmodule (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule {ι : Type*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
iSupIndep N ↔ iSupIndep fun i ↦ (N i : Submodule R M) := iSupIndep_toSubmodule.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias iSupIndep_iff_coe_toSubmodule := iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")]
alias independent_iff_toSubmodule := iSupIndep_iff_toSubmodule
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias independent_iff_coe_toSubmodule := independent_iff_toSubmodule
@[simp] lemma iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, N i = ⊤ := by
rw [← iSup_toSubmodule, ← top_toSubmodule (L := L), toSubmodule_inj]
@[deprecated iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top (since := "2025-04-03")]
theorem iSup_eq_top_iff_toSubmodule {ι : Sort*} {N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M} :
⨆ i, N i = ⊤ ↔ ⨆ i, (N i : Submodule R M) = ⊤ := iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")]
alias iSup_eq_top_iff_coe_toSubmodule := iSup_eq_top_iff_toSubmodule
instance : Add (LieSubmodule R L M) where add := max
instance : Zero (LieSubmodule R L M) where zero := ⊥
instance : AddCommMonoid (LieSubmodule R L M) where
add_assoc := sup_assoc
zero_add := bot_sup_eq
add_zero := sup_bot_eq
add_comm := sup_comm
nsmul := nsmulRec
variable (N N')
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup : N + N' = N ⊔ N' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊓ N' ↔ x ∈ N ∧ x ∈ N' := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule,
Submodule.mem_inf]
theorem mem_sup (x : M) : x ∈ N ⊔ N' ↔ ∃ y ∈ N, ∃ z ∈ N', y + z = x := by
rw [← mem_toSubmodule, sup_toSubmodule, Submodule.mem_sup]; exact Iff.rfl
nonrec theorem eq_bot_iff : N = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m : M, m ∈ N → m = 0 := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact Iff.rfl
instance subsingleton_of_bot : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)) := by
apply subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top
ext ⟨_, hx⟩
simp only [mem_bot, mk_eq_zero, mem_top, iff_true]
exact hx
instance : IsModularLattice (LieSubmodule R L M) where
sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _ _ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule, sup_toSubmodule, inf_toSubmodule]
exact IsModularLattice.sup_inf_le_assoc_of_le _
variable (R L M)
/-- The natural functor that forgets the action of `L` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps] def toSubmodule_orderEmbedding : LieSubmodule R L M ↪o Submodule R M :=
{ toFun := (↑)
inj' := toSubmodule_injective
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl }
instance wellFoundedGT_of_noetherian [IsNoetherian R M] : WellFoundedGT (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).dual.ltEmbedding
theorem wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian [IsArtinian R M] : WellFoundedLT (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
RelHomClass.isWellFounded (toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).ltEmbedding
instance [IsArtinian R M] : IsAtomic (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
isAtomic_of_orderBot_wellFounded_lt <| (wellFoundedLT_of_isArtinian R L M).wf
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton M :=
have h : Subsingleton (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Subsingleton (Submodule R M) := by
rw [← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, ← toSubmodule_inj,
top_toSubmodule, bot_toSubmodule]
h.trans <| Submodule.subsingleton_iff R
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) ↔ Nontrivial M :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans <| subsingleton_iff R L M).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
instance [Nontrivial M] : Nontrivial (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
(nontrivial_iff R L M).mpr ‹_›
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot {N : LieSubmodule R L M} : Nontrivial N ↔ N ≠ ⊥ := by
constructor <;> contrapose!
· rintro rfl
⟨⟨m₁, h₁ : m₁ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, ⟨m₂, h₂ : m₂ ∈ (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⟩, h₁₂⟩
simp [(LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₁, (LieSubmodule.mem_bot _).mp h₂] at h₁₂
· rw [not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff]
rintro ⟨h⟩ m hm
simpa using h ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨_, N.zero_mem⟩
variable {R L M}
section InclusionMaps
/-- The inclusion of a Lie submodule into its ambient space is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def incl : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ Submodule.subtype (N : Submodule R M) with map_lie' := fun {_ _} ↦ rfl }
@[simp]
theorem incl_coe : (N.incl : N →ₗ[R] M) = (N : Submodule R M).subtype :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem incl_apply (m : N) : N.incl m = m :=
rfl
theorem incl_eq_val : (N.incl : N → M) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem injective_incl : Function.Injective N.incl := Subtype.coe_injective
variable {N N'}
variable (h : N ≤ N')
/-- Given two nested Lie submodules `N ⊆ N'`,
the inclusion `N ↪ N'` is a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def inclusion : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N' where
__ := Submodule.inclusion (show N.toSubmodule ≤ N'.toSubmodule from h)
map_lie' := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion (m : N) : (inclusion h m : M) = m :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_apply (m : N) : inclusion h m = ⟨m.1, h m.2⟩ :=
rfl
theorem inclusion_injective : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := fun x y ↦ by
simp only [inclusion_apply, imp_self, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
end InclusionMaps
section LieSpan
variable (R L) (s : Set M)
/-- The `lieSpan` of a set `s ⊆ M` is the smallest Lie submodule of `M` that contains `s`. -/
def lieSpan : LieSubmodule R L M :=
sInf { N | s ⊆ N }
variable {R L s}
theorem mem_lieSpan {x : M} : x ∈ lieSpan R L s ↔ ∀ N : LieSubmodule R L M, s ⊆ N → x ∈ N := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, lieSpan, sInf_coe]
exact mem_iInter₂
theorem subset_lieSpan : s ⊆ lieSpan R L s := by
intro m hm
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN
exact hN hm
theorem submodule_span_le_lieSpan : Submodule.span R s ≤ lieSpan R L s := by
rw [Submodule.span_le]
apply subset_lieSpan
@[simp]
theorem lieSpan_le {N} : lieSpan R L s ≤ N ↔ s ⊆ N := by
constructor
· exact Subset.trans subset_lieSpan
· intro hs m hm; rw [mem_lieSpan] at hm; exact hm _ hs
theorem lieSpan_mono {t : Set M} (h : s ⊆ t) : lieSpan R L s ≤ lieSpan R L t := by
rw [lieSpan_le]
exact Subset.trans h subset_lieSpan
theorem lieSpan_eq (N : LieSubmodule R L M) : lieSpan R L (N : Set M) = N :=
le_antisymm (lieSpan_le.mpr rfl.subset) subset_lieSpan
theorem coe_lieSpan_submodule_eq_iff {p : Submodule R M} :
(lieSpan R L (p : Set M) : Submodule R M) = p ↔ ∃ N : LieSubmodule R L M, ↑N = p := by
rw [p.exists_lieSubmodule_coe_eq_iff L]; constructor <;> intro h
· intro x m hm; rw [← h, mem_toSubmodule]; exact lie_mem _ (subset_lieSpan hm)
· rw [← toSubmodule_mk p @h, coe_toSubmodule, toSubmodule_inj, lieSpan_eq]
variable (R L M)
/-- `lieSpan` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion from `LieSubmodule` to `Set`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (lieSpan R L : Set M → LieSubmodule R L M) (↑) where
choice s _ := lieSpan R L s
gc _ _ := lieSpan_le
le_l_u _ := subset_lieSpan
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : lieSpan R L (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : lieSpan R L (Set.univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_lieSpan
theorem lieSpan_eq_bot_iff : lieSpan R L s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, m = (0 : M) := by
rw [_root_.eq_bot_iff, lieSpan_le, bot_coe, subset_singleton_iff]
variable {M}
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : lieSpan R L (s ∪ t) = lieSpan R L s ⊔ lieSpan R L t :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_sup
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : lieSpan R L (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, lieSpan R L (s i) :=
(LieSubmodule.gi R L M).gc.l_iSup
/-- An induction principle for span membership. If `p` holds for 0 and all elements of `s`, and is
preserved under addition, scalar multiplication and the Lie bracket, then `p` holds for all
elements of the Lie submodule spanned by `s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem lieSpan_induction {p : (x : M) → x ∈ lieSpan R L s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_lieSpan h))
(zero : p 0 (LieSubmodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul : ∀ (a : R) (x hx), p x hx → p (a • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx)) {x}
(lie : ∀ (x : L) (y hy), p y hy → p (⁅x, y⁆) (LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ ‹_›))
(hx : x ∈ lieSpan R L s) : p x hx := by
let p : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
add_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hpx⟩
lie_mem := fun ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, lie _ _ _ hpy⟩ }
exact lieSpan_le (N := p) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_lieSpan hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
lemma isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton (m : M) :
CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement (lieSpan R L {m}) := by
rw [CompleteLattice.isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le]
intro s hne hdir hsup
replace hsup : m ∈ (↑(sSup s) : Set M) := (SetLike.le_def.mp hsup) (subset_lieSpan rfl)
suffices (↑(sSup s) : Set M) = ⋃ N ∈ s, ↑N by
obtain ⟨N : LieSubmodule R L M, hN : N ∈ s, hN' : m ∈ N⟩ := by
simp_rw [this, Set.mem_iUnion, SetLike.mem_coe, exists_prop] at hsup; assumption
exact ⟨N, hN, by simpa⟩
replace hne : Nonempty s := Set.nonempty_coe_sort.mpr hne
have := Submodule.coe_iSup_of_directed _ hdir.directed_val
simp_rw [← iSup_toSubmodule, Set.iUnion_coe_set, coe_toSubmodule] at this
rw [← this, SetLike.coe_set_eq, sSup_eq_iSup, iSup_subtype]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton : sSup ((fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N) = N := by
refine le_antisymm (sSup_le <| by simp) ?_
simp_rw [← toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule, sSup_toSubmodule, Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe]
refine fun m hm ↦ Submodule.mem_sSup.mpr fun N' hN' ↦ ?_
replace hN' : ∀ m ∈ N, lieSpan R L {m} ≤ N' := by simpa using hN'
exact hN' _ hm (subset_lieSpan rfl)
instance instIsCompactlyGenerated : IsCompactlyGenerated (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun N ↦ ⟨(fun x ↦ lieSpan R L {x}) '' N, fun _ ⟨m, _, hm⟩ ↦
hm ▸ isCompactElement_lieSpan_singleton R L m, N.sSup_image_lieSpan_singleton⟩⟩
end LieSpan
end LatticeStructure
end LieSubmodule
section LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {L' : Type w₂} {M : Type w} {M' : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieRing L'] [LieAlgebra R L']
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') (N N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M) (N' : LieSubmodule R L M')
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pushes forward Lie submodules of `M` to Lie submodules
of `M'`. -/
def map : LieSubmodule R L M' :=
{ (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m'} h ↦ by
rcases h with ⟨m, hm, hfm⟩; use ⁅x, m⁆; constructor
· apply N.lie_mem hm
· norm_cast at hfm; simp [hfm] }
@[simp] theorem coe_map : (N.map f : Set M') = f '' N := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_map : (N.map f : Submodule R M') = (N : Submodule R M).map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_map := toSubmodule_map
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → M'` pulls back Lie submodules of `M'` to Lie submodules of
`M`. -/
def comap : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') with
lie_mem := fun {x m} h ↦ by
suffices ⁅x, f m⁆ ∈ N' by simp [this]
apply N'.lie_mem h }
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_comap :
(N'.comap f : Submodule R M) = (N' : Submodule R M').comap (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_comap := toSubmodule_comap
variable {f N N₂ N'}
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f N ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ comap f N' :=
Set.image_subset_iff
variable (f) in
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem map_inf_le : (N ⊓ N₂).map f ≤ N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_inter_subset f N N₂
theorem map_inf (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(N ⊓ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊓ N₂.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_inter hf
@[simp]
theorem map_sup : (N ⊔ N₂).map f = N.map f ⊔ N₂.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem comap_inf {N₂' : LieSubmodule R L M'} :
(N' ⊓ N₂').comap f = N'.comap f ⊓ N₂'.comap f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (N : ι → LieSubmodule R L M) :
(⨆ i, N i).map f = ⨆ i, (N i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_map (m' : M') : m' ∈ N.map f ↔ ∃ m, m ∈ N ∧ f m = m' :=
Submodule.mem_map
theorem mem_map_of_mem {m : M} (h : m ∈ N) : f m ∈ N.map f :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {m : M} : m ∈ comap f N' ↔ f m ∈ N' :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_incl_eq_top : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊤ ↔ N ≤ N₂ := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_comap, LieSubmodule.incl_coe,
LieSubmodule.top_toSubmodule, Submodule.comap_subtype_eq_top, toSubmodule_le_toSubmodule]
theorem comap_incl_eq_bot : N₂.comap N.incl = ⊥ ↔ N ⊓ N₂ = ⊥ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_comap, incl_coe, bot_toSubmodule,
inf_toSubmodule]
rw [← Submodule.disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot, disjoint_iff]
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem map_mono (h : N ≤ N₂) : N.map f ≤ N₂.map f :=
Set.image_subset _ h
theorem map_comp
{M'' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M''] [Module R M''] [LieRingModule L M''] {g : M' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M''} :
N.map (g.comp f) = (N.map f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [← Set.image_comp, coe_map, LinearMap.coe_comp, LieModuleHom.coe_comp]
@[simp]
theorem map_id : N.map LieModuleHom.id = N := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem map_bot :
(⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M).map f = ⊥ := by
ext m; simp [eq_comm]
lemma map_le_map_iff (hf : Function.Injective f) :
N.map f ≤ N₂.map f ↔ N ≤ N₂ :=
Set.image_subset_image_iff hf
lemma map_injective_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f) := fun {N N'} h ↦
SetLike.coe_injective <| hf.image_injective <| by simp only [← coe_map, h]
/-- An injective morphism of Lie modules embeds the lattice of submodules of the domain into that
of the target. -/
@[simps] def mapOrderEmbedding {f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
LieSubmodule R L M ↪o LieSubmodule R L M' where
toFun := LieSubmodule.map f
inj' := map_injective_of_injective hf
map_rel_iff' := Set.image_subset_image_iff hf
variable (N) in
/-- For an injective morphism of Lie modules, any Lie submodule is equivalent to its image. -/
noncomputable def equivMapOfInjective (hf : Function.Injective f) :
N ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N.map f :=
{ Submodule.equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') hf N with
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to specify `invFun` explicitly this way, otherwise we'd get a type mismatch
invFun := by exact DFunLike.coe (Submodule.equivMapOfInjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') hf N).symm
map_lie' := by rintro x ⟨m, hm : m ∈ N⟩; ext; exact f.map_lie x m }
/-- An equivalence of Lie modules yields an order-preserving equivalence of their lattices of Lie
Submodules. -/
@[simps] def orderIsoMapComap (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
LieSubmodule R L M ≃o LieSubmodule R L M' where
toFun := map e
invFun := comap e
left_inv := fun N ↦ by ext; simp
right_inv := fun N ↦ by ext; simp [e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
map_rel_iff' := fun {_ _} ↦ Set.image_subset_image_iff e.injective
end LieSubmodule
end LieSubmoduleMapAndComap
namespace LieModuleHom
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {N : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [LieRingModule L N]
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N)
/-- The kernel of a morphism of Lie algebras, as an ideal in the domain. -/
def ker : LieSubmodule R L M :=
LieSubmodule.comap f ⊥
@[simp]
theorem ker_toSubmodule : (f.ker : Submodule R M) = LinearMap.ker (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias ker_coeSubmodule := ker_toSubmodule
theorem ker_eq_bot : f.ker = ⊥ ↔ Function.Injective f := by
rw [← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, ker_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.bot_toSubmodule,
LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, coe_toLinearMap]
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ker {m : M} : m ∈ f.ker ↔ f m = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_id : (LieModuleHom.id : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M).ker = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_ker_incl : f.comp f.ker.incl = 0 := by ext ⟨m, hm⟩; exact mem_ker.mp hm
theorem le_ker_iff_map (M' : LieSubmodule R L M) : M' ≤ f.ker ↔ LieSubmodule.map f M' = ⊥ := by
rw [ker, eq_bot_iff, LieSubmodule.map_le_iff_le_comap]
variable (f)
/-- The range of a morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` is a Lie submodule of `N`.
See Note [range copy pattern]. -/
def range : LieSubmodule R L N :=
(LieSubmodule.map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_range : f.range = Set.range f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_range : f.range = LinearMap.range (f : M →ₗ[R] N) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-30")] alias coeSubmodule_range := toSubmodule_range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (n : N) : n ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ m, f m = n :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_top : LieSubmodule.map f ⊤ = f.range := by ext; simp [LieSubmodule.mem_map]
theorem range_eq_top : f.range = ⊤ ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, coe_range, LieSubmodule.top_coe, Set.range_eq_univ]
/-- A morphism of Lie modules `f : M → N` whose values lie in a Lie submodule `P ⊆ N` can be
restricted to a morphism of Lie modules `M → P`. -/
def codRestrict (P : LieSubmodule R L N) (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (h : ∀ m, f m ∈ P) :
M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P where
toFun := f.toLinearMap.codRestrict P h
__ := f.toLinearMap.codRestrict P h
map_lie' {x m} := by ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma codRestrict_apply (P : LieSubmodule R L N) (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N) (h : ∀ m, f m ∈ P) (m : M) :
(f.codRestrict P h m : N) = f m :=
rfl
end LieModuleHom
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M)
@[simp]
theorem ker_incl : N.incl.ker = ⊥ := (LieModuleHom.ker_eq_bot N.incl).mpr <| injective_incl N
@[simp]
theorem range_incl : N.incl.range = N := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, LieModuleHom.toSubmodule_range, incl_coe]
rw [Submodule.range_subtype]
@[simp]
theorem comap_incl_self : comap N.incl N = ⊤ := by
simp only [← toSubmodule_inj, toSubmodule_comap, incl_coe, top_toSubmodule]
rw [Submodule.comap_subtype_self]
theorem map_incl_top : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L N).map N.incl = N := by simp
variable {N}
@[simp]
lemma map_le_range {M' : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
N.map f ≤ f.range := by
rw [← LieModuleHom.map_top]
exact LieSubmodule.map_mono le_top
@[simp]
lemma map_incl_lt_iff_lt_top {N' : LieSubmodule R L N} :
N'.map (LieSubmodule.incl N) < N ↔ N' < ⊤ := by
convert (LieSubmodule.mapOrderEmbedding (f := N.incl) Subtype.coe_injective).lt_iff_lt
simp
@[simp]
lemma map_incl_le {N' : LieSubmodule R L N} :
N'.map N.incl ≤ N := by
conv_rhs => rw [← N.map_incl_top]
exact LieSubmodule.map_mono le_top
end LieSubmodule
section TopEquiv
variable (R : Type u) (L : Type v)
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie submodule and the enclosing Lie module. -/
def LieModuleEquiv.ofTop : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M) ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
{ LinearEquiv.ofTop ⊤ rfl with
map_lie' := rfl }
variable {R L}
lemma LieModuleEquiv.ofTop_apply (x : (⊤ : LieSubmodule R L M)) :
LieModuleEquiv.ofTop R L M x = x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma LieModuleEquiv.range_coe {M' : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] (e : M ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') :
LieModuleHom.range (e : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M') = ⊤ := by
rw [LieModuleHom.range_eq_top]
exact e.surjective
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M]
/-- The natural equivalence between the 'top' Lie subalgebra and the enclosing Lie algebra.
This is the Lie subalgebra version of `Submodule.topEquiv`. -/
def LieSubalgebra.topEquiv : (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ L :=
{ (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L).incl with
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x, Set.mem_univ x⟩
left_inv := fun x ↦ by ext; rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl }
@[simp]
theorem LieSubalgebra.topEquiv_apply (x : (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L)) : LieSubalgebra.topEquiv x = x :=
rfl
end TopEquiv
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Submodule.lean | 1,154 | 1,156 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by
rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop]
· simpa only [finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulSupport_mulIndicator]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the value of `g` at the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `g (f i)` over `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an additive monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the
value of `g` at the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `g (f i)` over `s`."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem (f : α → M) (g : M →* N) (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_mem' (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod_mem (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_mem f hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod_mem f hs).symm
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` divided by the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` minus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f g : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) / ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mem_mul_distrib hs, finprod_mem_inv_distrib g hs]
/-!
### `∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x` and set operations
-/
/-- The product of any function over an empty set is `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of any function over an empty set is `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_empty : (∏ᶠ i ∈ (∅ : Set α), f i) = 1 := by simp
/-- A set `s` is nonempty if the product of some function over `s` is not equal to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `s` is nonempty if the sum of some function over `s` is not equal to `0`."]
theorem nonempty_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ finprod_mem_empty
/-- Given finite sets `s` and `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` times the product of
`f i` over `i ∈ s ∩ t` equals the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` times the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given finite sets `s` and `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` plus the sum of
`f i` over `i ∈ s ∩ t` equals the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_union_inter (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
lift s to Finset α using hs; lift t to Finset α using ht
classical
rw [← Finset.coe_union, ← Finset.coe_inter]
simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset, Finset.prod_union_inter]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union_inter` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union_inter` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_union_inter' (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f s, ← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f t, ←
finprod_mem_union_inter hs ht, ← union_inter_distrib_right, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, ←
finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f (s ∩ t)]
congr 2
rw [inter_left_comm, inter_assoc, inter_assoc, inter_self, inter_left_comm]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_union' (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite)
(ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_union_inter' hs ht, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 hst, finprod_mem_empty,
mul_one]
/-- Given two finite disjoint sets `s` and `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` equals the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` times the product of `f i` over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given two finite disjoint sets `s` and `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` equals
the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_union (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_mem_union' hst (hs.inter_of_left _) (ht.inter_of_left _)
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union'` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be disjoint -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union'` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be disjoint"]
theorem finprod_mem_union'' (hst : Disjoint (s ∩ mulSupport f) (t ∩ mulSupport f))
(hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f s, ← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f t, ←
finprod_mem_union hst hs ht, ← union_inter_distrib_right, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
/-- The product of `f i` over `i ∈ {a}` equals `f a`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of `f i` over `i ∈ {a}` equals `f a`."]
theorem finprod_mem_singleton : (∏ᶠ i ∈ ({a} : Set α), f i) = f a := by
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton, finprod_mem_coe_finset, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_left : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i = a), f i) = f a :=
finprod_mem_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_right : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : a = i), f i) = f a := by simp [@eq_comm _ a]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_insert` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s`
to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_insert` that requires `s ∩ support f` rather
than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert' (f : α → M) (h : a ∉ s) (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = f a * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [insert_eq, finprod_mem_union' _ _ hs, finprod_mem_singleton]
· rwa [disjoint_singleton_left]
· exact (finite_singleton a).inter_of_left _
/-- Given a finite set `s` and an element `a ∉ s`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals
`f a` times the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s` and an element `a ∉ s`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s`
equals `f a` plus the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert (f : α → M) (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = f a * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_insert' f h <| hs.inter_of_left _
/-- If `f a = 1` when `a ∉ s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the product of
`f i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f a = 0` when `a ∉ s`, then the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the sum
of `f i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
refine finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' _ _ _ fun x hx => ⟨?_, Or.inr⟩
rintro (rfl | hxs)
exacts [not_imp_comm.1 h hx, hxs]
/-- If `f a = 1`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the product of `f i` over
`i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f a = 0`, then the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert_one (h : f a = 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
/-- If the multiplicative support of `f` is finite, then for every `x` in the domain of `f`, `f x`
divides `finprod f`. -/
theorem finprod_mem_dvd {f : α → N} (a : α) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : f a ∣ finprod f := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ mulSupport f
· rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf (Set.Subset.refl _)]
exact Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem f ((Finite.mem_toFinset hf).mpr ha)
· rw [nmem_mulSupport.mp ha]
exact one_dvd (finprod f)
/-- The product of `f i` over `i ∈ {a, b}`, `a ≠ b`, is equal to `f a * f b`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of `f i` over `i ∈ {a, b}`, `a ≠ b`, is equal to `f a + f b`."]
theorem finprod_mem_pair (h : a ≠ b) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), f i) = f a * f b := by
rw [finprod_mem_insert, finprod_mem_singleton]
exacts [h, finite_singleton b]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the product of `f (g i)` over `s`
provided that `g` is injective on `s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s ∩ support (f ∘ g)`."]
theorem finprod_mem_image' {s : Set β} {g : β → α} (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)).InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ g '' s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f (g j) := by
classical
by_cases hs : (s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)).Finite
· have hg : ∀ x ∈ hs.toFinset, ∀ y ∈ hs.toFinset, g x = g y → x = y := by
simpa only [hs.mem_toFinset]
have := finprod_mem_eq_prod (comp f g) hs
unfold Function.comp at this
rw [this, ← Finset.prod_image hg]
refine finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq f ?_
rw [Finset.coe_image, hs.coe_toFinset, ← image_inter_mulSupport_eq, inter_assoc, inter_self]
· unfold Function.comp at hs
rw [finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite hs, finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite]
rwa [image_inter_mulSupport_eq, infinite_image_iff hg]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the product of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_image {s : Set β} {g : β → α} (hg : s.InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ g '' s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f (g j) :=
finprod_mem_image' <| hg.mono inter_subset_left
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the product of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective on `mulSupport (f ∘ g)`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective on `support (f ∘ g)`."]
theorem finprod_mem_range' {g : β → α} (hg : (mulSupport (f ∘ g)).InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ range g, f i = ∏ᶠ j, f (g j) := by
rw [← image_univ, finprod_mem_image', finprod_mem_univ]
rwa [univ_inter]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the product of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective."]
theorem finprod_mem_range {g : β → α} (hg : Injective g) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ range g, f i = ∏ᶠ j, f (g j) :=
finprod_mem_range' hg.injOn
/-- See also `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_of_bijOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → M} {g : β → M} (e : α → β)
(he₀ : s.BijOn e t) (he₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, g j := by
rw [← Set.BijOn.image_eq he₀, finprod_mem_image he₀.2.1]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl he₁
/-- See `finprod_comp`, `Fintype.prod_bijective` and `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See `finsum_comp`, `Fintype.sum_bijective` and `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_eq_of_bijective {f : α → M} {g : β → M} (e : α → β) (he₀ : Bijective e)
(he₁ : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ᶠ j, g j := by
rw [← finprod_mem_univ f, ← finprod_mem_univ g]
exact finprod_mem_eq_of_bijOn _ (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.mp he₀) fun x _ => he₁ x
/-- See also `finprod_eq_of_bijective`, `Fintype.prod_bijective` and `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `finsum_eq_of_bijective`, `Fintype.sum_bijective` and `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_comp {g : β → M} (e : α → β) (he₀ : Function.Bijective e) :
(∏ᶠ i, g (e i)) = ∏ᶠ j, g j :=
finprod_eq_of_bijective e he₀ fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_comp_equiv (e : α ≃ β) {f : β → M} : (∏ᶠ i, f (e i)) = ∏ᶠ i', f i' :=
finprod_comp e e.bijective
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem (s : Set α) : ∏ᶠ j : s, f j = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_range, Subtype.range_coe]
exact Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_subtype_eq_finprod_cond (p : α → Prop) :
∏ᶠ j : Subtype p, f j = ∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i :=
finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem { i | p i }
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' (t : Set α) (h : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s \ t, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_union', inter_union_diff]
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
exact fun x hx => hx.2.2 hx.1.2
exacts [h.subset fun x hx => ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩, h.subset fun x hx => ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff (t : Set α) (h : s.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s \ t, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' _ <| h.inter_of_left _
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_diff` that requires `t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than
`t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_diff` that requires `t ∩ support f` rather
than `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_diff' (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t \ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' _ ht, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
/-- Given a finite set `t` and a subset `s` of `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
times the product of `f i` over `t \ s` equals the product of `f i` over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `t` and a subset `s` of `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus
the sum of `f i` over `t \\ s` equals the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t \ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_mem_mul_diff' hst (ht.inter_of_left _)
/-- Given a family of pairwise disjoint finite sets `t i` indexed by a finite type, the product of
`f a` over the union `⋃ i, t i` is equal to the product over all indexes `i` of the products of
`f a` over `a ∈ t i`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a family of pairwise disjoint finite sets `t i` indexed by a finite type, the
sum of `f a` over the union `⋃ i, t i` is equal to the sum over all indexes `i` of the
sums of `f a` over `a ∈ t i`."]
theorem finprod_mem_iUnion [Finite ι] {t : ι → Set α} (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t))
(ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃ i : ι, t i, f a = ∏ᶠ i, ∏ᶠ a ∈ t i, f a := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
lift t to ι → Finset α using ht
classical
rw [← biUnion_univ, ← Finset.coe_univ, ← Finset.coe_biUnion, finprod_mem_coe_finset,
Finset.prod_biUnion]
· simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset, finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype]
· exact fun x _ y _ hxy => Finset.disjoint_coe.1 (h hxy)
/-- Given a family of sets `t : ι → Set α`, a finite set `I` in the index type such that all sets
`t i`, `i ∈ I`, are finite, if all `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are pairwise disjoint, then the product of `f a`
over `a ∈ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i` is equal to the product over `i ∈ I` of the products of `f a` over
`a ∈ t i`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a family of sets `t : ι → Set α`, a finite set `I` in the index type such that
all sets `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are finite, if all `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are pairwise disjoint, then the
sum of `f a` over `a ∈ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i` is equal to the sum over `i ∈ I` of the sums of `f a`
over `a ∈ t i`."]
theorem finprod_mem_biUnion {I : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : I.PairwiseDisjoint t) (hI : I.Finite)
(ht : ∀ i ∈ I, (t i).Finite) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃ x ∈ I, t x, f a = ∏ᶠ i ∈ I, ∏ᶠ j ∈ t i, f j := by
haveI := hI.fintype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, finprod_mem_iUnion, ← finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem]
exacts [fun x y hxy => h x.2 y.2 (Subtype.coe_injective.ne hxy), fun b => ht b b.2]
/-- If `t` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint finite sets, then the product of `f a`
over `a ∈ ⋃₀ t` is the product over `s ∈ t` of the products of `f a` over `a ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `t` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint finite sets, then the sum of `f a` over
`a ∈ ⋃₀ t` is the sum over `s ∈ t` of the sums of `f a` over `a ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_sUnion {t : Set (Set α)} (h : t.PairwiseDisjoint id) (ht₀ : t.Finite)
(ht₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, Set.Finite x) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃₀ t, f a = ∏ᶠ s ∈ t, ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion]
exact finprod_mem_biUnion h ht₀ ht₁
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_option {f : Option α → M} (hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ some)).Finite) :
∏ᶠ o, f o = f none * ∏ᶠ a, f (some a) := by
replace hf : (mulSupport f).Finite := by simpa [finite_option]
convert finprod_mem_insert' f (show none ∉ Set.range Option.some by aesop)
(hf.subset inter_subset_right)
· aesop
· rw [finprod_mem_range]
exact Option.some_injective _
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_finprod_cond_ne (a : α) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(f a * ∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
have h : ∀ x : α, f x ≠ 1 → (x ≠ a ↔ x ∈ hf.toFinset \ {a}) := by
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro hx h, fun h => h.2⟩
rw [finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff f (fun hx => h _ hx), Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
by_cases ha : a ∈ mulSupport f
· apply Finset.mul_prod_erase _ _ ((Finite.mem_toFinset _).mpr ha)
· rw [mem_mulSupport, not_not] at ha
rw [ha, one_mul]
apply Finset.prod_erase _ ha
/-- If `s : Set α` and `t : Set β` are finite sets, then taking the product over `s` commutes with
taking the product over `t`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `s : Set α` and `t : Set β` are finite sets, then summing over `s` commutes with
summing over `t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_comm {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (f : α → β → M) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ s, ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, f i j) = ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i j := by
lift s to Finset α using hs; lift t to Finset β using ht
simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset]
exact Finset.prod_comm
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on summands."]
theorem finprod_mem_induction (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1) (hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(hp₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) : p (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) :=
finprod_induction _ hp₀ hp₁ fun x => finprod_induction _ hp₀ hp₁ <| hp₂ x
theorem finprod_cond_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{p : α → Prop} {f : α → R}
(hf : ∀ x, p x → 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ ∏ᶠ (x) (_ : p x), f x :=
finprod_nonneg fun x => finprod_nonneg <| hf x
@[to_additive]
theorem single_le_finprod {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
(i : α) {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (h : ∀ j, 1 ≤ f j) : f i ≤ ∏ᶠ j, f j := by
classical calc
f i ≤ ∏ j ∈ insert i hf.toFinset, f j :=
Finset.single_le_prod' (fun j _ => h j) (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
_ = ∏ᶠ j, f j :=
(finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ hf (Finset.subset_insert _ _)).symm
theorem finprod_eq_zero {M₀ : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] (f : α → M₀) (x : α) (hx : f x = 0)
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : ∏ᶠ x, f x = 0 := by
nontriviality
rw [finprod_eq_prod f hf]
refine Finset.prod_eq_zero (hf.mem_toFinset.2 ?_) hx
simp [hx]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_prod_comm (s : Finset β) (f : α → β → M)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, (mulSupport fun a => f a b).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ a : α, ∏ b ∈ s, f a b) = ∏ b ∈ s, ∏ᶠ a : α, f a b := by
have hU :
(mulSupport fun a => ∏ b ∈ s, f a b) ⊆
(s.finite_toSet.biUnion fun b hb => h b (Finset.mem_coe.1 hb)).toFinset := by
rw [Finite.coe_toFinset]
intro x hx
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, Ne, mem_mulSupport, Finset.mem_coe]
contrapose! hx
rw [mem_mulSupport, not_not, Finset.prod_congr rfl hx, Finset.prod_const_one]
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hU, Finset.prod_comm]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun b hb => (finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_).symm
intro a ha
simp only [Finite.coe_toFinset, mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨b, hb, ha⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finprod_comm (s : Finset α) (f : α → β → M) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, (mulSupport (f a)).Finite) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ᶠ b : β, f a b) = ∏ᶠ b : β, ∏ a ∈ s, f a b :=
(finprod_prod_comm s (fun b a => f a b) h).symm
theorem mul_finsum {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (f : α → R) (r : R)
(h : (support f).Finite) : (r * ∑ᶠ a : α, f a) = ∑ᶠ a : α, r * f a :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft r).map_finsum h
theorem mul_finsum_mem {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] {s : Set α} (f : α → R) (r : R)
(hs : s.Finite) : (r * ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, r * f a :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft r).map_finsum_mem f hs
theorem finsum_mul {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (f : α → R) (r : R)
(h : (support f).Finite) : (∑ᶠ a : α, f a) * r = ∑ᶠ a : α, f a * r :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulRight r).map_finsum h
theorem finsum_mem_mul {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] {s : Set α} (f : α → R) (r : R)
(hs : s.Finite) : (∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a) * r = ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a * r :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulRight r).map_finsum_mem f hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finprod_apply {α ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → N} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (a : α) :
(∏ᶠ i, f i) a = ∏ᶠ i, f i a := by
classical
have hf' : (mulSupport fun i ↦ f i a).Finite := hf.subset (by aesop)
simp only [finprod_def, dif_pos, hf, hf', Finset.prod_apply]
symm
apply Finset.prod_subset <;> aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.mulSupport_of_fiberwise_prod_subset_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → M)
(g : α → β) : (mulSupport fun b => ∏ a ∈ s with g a = b, f a) ⊆ s.image g := by
simp only [Finset.coe_image, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Function.support_subset_iff]
intro b h
suffices {a ∈ s | g a = b}.Nonempty by
simpa only [fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image, Finset.mem_image, exists_prop]
exact Finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h
/-- Note that `b ∈ (s.filter (fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a)).image Prod.snd` iff `(a, b) ∈ s` so
we can simplify the right hand side of this lemma. However the form stated here is more useful for
iterating this lemma, e.g., if we have `f : α × β × γ → M`. -/
@[to_additive
"Note that `b ∈ (s.filter (fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a)).image Prod.snd` iff `(a, b) ∈ s` so
we can simplify the right hand side of this lemma. However the form stated here is more
useful for iterating this lemma, e.g., if we have `f : α × β × γ → M`."]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_product' [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset (α × β))
(f : α × β → M) :
(∏ᶠ (ab) (_ : ab ∈ s), f ab) =
∏ᶠ (a) (b) (_ : b ∈ (s.filter fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a).image Prod.snd), f (a, b) := by
have (a) :
∏ i ∈ (s.filter fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a).image Prod.snd, f (a, i) =
(s.filter (Prod.fst · = a)).prod f := by
refine Finset.prod_nbij' (fun b ↦ (a, b)) Prod.snd ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
rw [finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod]
simp_rw [finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod, this]
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _
(s.mulSupport_of_fiberwise_prod_subset_image f Prod.fst),
← Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (t := Finset.image Prod.fst s) _ f]
-- `finish` could close the goal here
simp only [Finset.mem_image]
exact fun x hx => ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
/-- See also `finprod_mem_finset_product'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `finsum_mem_finset_product'`."]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_product (s : Finset (α × β)) (f : α × β → M) :
(∏ᶠ (ab) (_ : ab ∈ s), f ab) = ∏ᶠ (a) (b) (_ : (a, b) ∈ s), f (a, b) := by
classical
rw [finprod_mem_finset_product']
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_product₃ {γ : Type*} (s : Finset (α × β × γ)) (f : α × β × γ → M) :
(∏ᶠ (abc) (_ : abc ∈ s), f abc) = ∏ᶠ (a) (b) (c) (_ : (a, b, c) ∈ s), f (a, b, c) := by
classical
rw [finprod_mem_finset_product']
simp_rw [finprod_mem_finset_product']
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_curry (f : α × β → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ ab, f ab = ∏ᶠ (a) (b), f (a, b) := by
have h₁ : ∀ a, ∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ hf.toFinset, f a = f a := by simp
have h₂ : ∏ᶠ a, f a = ∏ᶠ (a) (_ : a ∈ hf.toFinset), f a := by simp
simp_rw [h₂, finprod_mem_finset_product, h₁]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_curry₃ {γ : Type*} (f : α × β × γ → M) (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ abc, f abc = ∏ᶠ (a) (b) (c), f (a, b, c) := by
rw [finprod_curry f h]
congr
ext a
rw [finprod_curry]
simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_dmem {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a : α, a ∈ s → M) :
(∏ᶠ (a : α) (h : a ∈ s), f a h) = ∏ᶠ (a : α) (_ : a ∈ s), if h' : a ∈ s then f a h' else 1 :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_congr fun ha => (dif_pos ha).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_emb_domain' {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)]
(g : α → M) :
(∏ᶠ b : β, if h : b ∈ Set.range f then g (Classical.choose h) else 1) = ∏ᶠ a : α, g a := by
simp_rw [← finprod_eq_dif]
rw [finprod_dmem, finprod_mem_range hf, finprod_congr fun a => _]
intro a
rw [dif_pos (Set.mem_range_self a), hf (Classical.choose_spec (Set.mem_range_self a))]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_emb_domain (f : α ↪ β) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (g : α → M) :
(∏ᶠ b : β, if h : b ∈ Set.range f then g (Classical.choose h) else 1) = ∏ᶠ a : α, g a :=
finprod_emb_domain' f.injective g
end type
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 1,277 | 1,281 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Associator
/-!
# The `A`-module structure on `M ⊗[R] N`
When `M` is both an `R`-module and an `A`-module, and `Algebra R A`, then many of the morphisms
preserve the actions by `A`.
The `Module` instance itself is provided elsewhere as `TensorProduct.leftModule`. This file provides
more general versions of the definitions already in `LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct`.
In this file, we use the convention that `M`, `N`, `P`, `Q` are all `R`-modules, but only `M` and
`P` are simultaneously `A`-modules.
## Main definitions
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.curry`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.uncurry`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lcurry`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift.equiv`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.mk`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.map`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.mapBilinear`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.congr`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.rid`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.homTensorHomMap`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.assoc`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.leftComm`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.rightComm`
* `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.tensorTensorTensorComm`
## Implementation notes
We could thus consider replacing the less general definitions with these ones. If we do this, we
probably should still implement the less general ones as abbreviations to the more general ones with
fewer type arguments.
-/
suppress_compilation
namespace TensorProduct
namespace AlgebraTensorModule
universe uR uA uB uM uN uP uQ uP' uQ'
variable {R : Type uR} {A : Type uA} {B : Type uB}
variable {M : Type uM} {N : Type uN} {P : Type uP} {Q : Type uQ} {P' : Type uP'} {Q' : Type uQ'}
open LinearMap
open Algebra (lsmul)
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M]
variable [IsScalarTower R A M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P] [Module A P]
variable [IsScalarTower R A P]
variable [AddCommMonoid Q] [Module R Q]
variable [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R P'] [Module A P'] [Module B P']
variable [IsScalarTower R A P'] [IsScalarTower R B P'] [SMulCommClass A B P']
variable [AddCommMonoid Q'] [Module R Q']
theorem smul_eq_lsmul_rTensor (a : A) (x : M ⊗[R] N) : a • x = (lsmul R R M a).rTensor N x :=
rfl
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.curry`:
Given a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P`, compose it with the canonical
bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` to form a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps]
nonrec def curry (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P) : M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ curry (f.restrictScalars R) with
toFun := curry (f.restrictScalars R)
map_smul' := fun c x => LinearMap.ext fun y => f.map_smul c (x ⊗ₜ y) }
theorem restrictScalars_curry (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P) :
restrictScalars R (curry f) = TensorProduct.curry (f.restrictScalars R) :=
rfl
/-- Just as `TensorProduct.ext` is marked `ext` instead of `TensorProduct.ext'`, this is
a better `ext` lemma than `TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.ext` below.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
nonrec theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (M ⊗ N →ₗ[A] P) → M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P) :=
fun _ _ h =>
LinearMap.restrictScalars_injective R <|
curry_injective <| (congr_arg (LinearMap.restrictScalars R) h :)
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
curry_injective <| LinearMap.ext₂ H
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.lift`:
Constructing a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P` given a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P` with the
property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` is
the given bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
nonrec def lift (f : M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P :=
{ lift (f.restrictScalars R) with
map_smul' := fun c =>
show
∀ x : M ⊗[R] N,
(lift (f.restrictScalars R)).comp (lsmul R R _ c) x =
(lsmul R R _ c).comp (lift (f.restrictScalars R)) x
from
LinearMap.ext_iff.1 <|
TensorProduct.ext' fun x y => by
simp only [comp_apply, Algebra.lsmul_coe, smul_tmul', lift.tmul,
coe_restrictScalars, f.map_smul, smul_apply] }
@[simp]
theorem lift_apply (f : M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P) (a : M ⊗[R] N) :
AlgebraTensorModule.lift f a = TensorProduct.lift (LinearMap.restrictScalars R f) a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_tmul (f : M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P) (x : M) (y : N) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
variable (R A B M N P Q)
section
variable [Module B P] [IsScalarTower R B P] [SMulCommClass A B P]
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.uncurry`:
Linearly constructing a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P` given a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` is
the given bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps]
def uncurry : (M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[B] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P where
toFun := lift
map_add' _ _ := ext fun x y => by simp only [lift_tmul, add_apply]
map_smul' _ _ := ext fun x y => by simp only [lift_tmul, smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.lcurry`:
Given a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P`, compose it with the canonical
bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` to form a bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
@[simps]
def lcurry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P) →ₗ[B] M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P where
toFun := curry
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.lift.equiv`:
A linear equivalence constructing a linear map `M ⊗[R] N →[A] P` given a
bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P` with the property that its composition with the
canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N` is the given bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] P`. -/
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ[B] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (uncurry R A B M N P) (lcurry R A B M N P)
(LinearMap.ext fun _ => ext fun x y => lift_tmul _ x y)
(LinearMap.ext fun f => LinearMap.ext fun x => LinearMap.ext fun y => lift_tmul f x y)
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.mk`:
The canonical bilinear map `M →[A] N →[R] M ⊗[R] N`. -/
@[simps! apply]
nonrec def mk : M →ₗ[A] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
{ mk R M N with map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
variable {R A B M N P Q}
/-- Heterobasic version of `TensorProduct.map` -/
def map (f : M →ₗ[A] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] P ⊗[R] Q :=
lift <|
{ toFun := fun h => h ∘ₗ g,
map_add' := fun h₁ h₂ => LinearMap.add_comp g h₂ h₁,
map_smul' := fun c h => LinearMap.smul_comp c h g } ∘ₗ mk R A P Q ∘ₗ f
@[simp] theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ[A] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (id : M →ₗ[A] M) (id : N →ₗ[R] N) = .id :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem map_comp (f₂ : P →ₗ[A] P') (f₁ : M →ₗ[A] P) (g₂ : Q →ₗ[R] Q') (g₁ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₂.comp f₁) (g₂.comp g₁) = (map f₂ g₂).comp (map f₁ g₁) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : map (1 : M →ₗ[A] M) (1 : N →ₗ[R] N) = 1 := map_id
protected theorem map_mul (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[A] M) (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] N) :
map (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) = map f₁ g₁ * map f₂ g₂ := map_comp _ _ _ _
theorem map_add_left (f₁ f₂ : M →ₗ[A] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map (f₁ + f₂) g = map f₁ g + map f₂ g := by
ext
simp_rw [curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply, restrictScalars_apply, add_apply, map_tmul,
add_apply, add_tmul]
theorem map_add_right (f : M →ₗ[A] P) (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
map f (g₁ + g₂) = map f g₁ + map f g₂ := by
ext
simp_rw [curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply, restrictScalars_apply, add_apply, map_tmul,
add_apply, tmul_add]
theorem map_smul_right (r : R) (f : M →ₗ[A] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map f (r • g) = r • map f g := by
ext
simp_rw [curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply, restrictScalars_apply, smul_apply, map_tmul,
smul_apply, tmul_smul]
theorem map_smul_left (b : B) (f : M →ₗ[A] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) : map (b • f) g = b • map f g := by
ext
simp_rw [curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply, restrictScalars_apply, smul_apply, map_tmul,
smul_apply, smul_tmul']
variable (A M) in
/-- Heterobasic version of `LinearMap.lTensor` -/
def lTensor : (N →ₗ[R] Q) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[A] M ⊗[R] Q where
toFun f := map LinearMap.id f
map_add' f₁ f₂ := map_add_right _ f₁ f₂
map_smul' _ _ := map_smul_right _ _ _
@[simp]
| lemma coe_lTensor (f : N →ₗ[R] Q) :
(lTensor A M f : M ⊗[R] N → M ⊗[R] Q) = f.lTensor M := rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Tower.lean | 229 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Graph
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
/-! ### Products of modules
This file defines constructors for linear maps whose domains or codomains are products.
It contains theorems relating these to each other, as well as to `Submodule.prod`, `Submodule.map`,
`Submodule.comap`, `LinearMap.range`, and `LinearMap.ker`.
## Main definitions
- products in the domain:
- `LinearMap.fst`
- `LinearMap.snd`
- `LinearMap.coprod`
- `LinearMap.prod_ext`
- products in the codomain:
- `LinearMap.inl`
- `LinearMap.inr`
- `LinearMap.prod`
- products in both domain and codomain:
- `LinearMap.prodMap`
- `LinearEquiv.prodMap`
- `LinearEquiv.skewProd`
-/
universe u v w x y z u' v' w' y'
variable {R : Type u} {K : Type u'} {M : Type v} {V : Type v'} {M₂ : Type w} {V₂ : Type w'}
variable {M₃ : Type y} {V₃ : Type y'} {M₄ : Type z} {ι : Type x}
variable {M₅ M₆ : Type*}
section Prod
namespace LinearMap
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₅] [AddCommMonoid M₆]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
variable [Module R M₅] [Module R M₆]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂)
section
variable (R M M₂)
/-- The first projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M where
toFun := Prod.fst
map_add' _x _y := rfl
map_smul' _x _y := rfl
/-- The second projection of a product is a linear map. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun := Prod.snd
map_add' _x _y := rfl
map_smul' _x _y := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_apply (x : M × M₂) : fst R M M₂ x = x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_apply (x : M × M₂) : snd R M M₂ x = x.2 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : ⇑(fst R M M₂) = Prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : ⇑(snd R M M₂) = Prod.snd := rfl
theorem fst_surjective : Function.Surjective (fst R M M₂) := fun x => ⟨(x, 0), rfl⟩
theorem snd_surjective : Function.Surjective (snd R M M₂) := fun x => ⟨(0, x), rfl⟩
/-- The prod of two linear maps is a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ where
toFun := Pi.prod f g
map_add' x y := by simp only [Pi.prod, Prod.mk_add_mk, map_add]
map_smul' c x := by simp only [Pi.prod, Prod.smul_mk, map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
theorem coe_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : ⇑(f.prod g) = Pi.prod f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (fst R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : (snd R M₂ M₃).comp (prod f g) = g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem pair_fst_snd : prod (fst R M M₂) (snd R M M₂) = LinearMap.id := rfl
theorem prod_comp (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄)
(h : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (f.prod g).comp h = (f.comp h).prod (g.comp h) :=
rfl
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same domain is equivalent to taking the product of
their codomains.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def prodEquiv [Module S M₂] [Module S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₂] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] :
((M →ₗ[R] M₂) × (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) ≃ₗ[S] M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃ where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f := ((fst _ _ _).comp f, (snd _ _ _).comp f)
left_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
section
variable (R M M₂)
/-- The left injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inl : M →ₗ[R] M × M₂ :=
prod LinearMap.id 0
/-- The right injection into a product is a linear map. -/
def inr : M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ :=
prod 0 LinearMap.id
theorem range_inl : range (inl R M M₂) = ker (snd R M M₂) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_ker, mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rfl
· intro h
exact ⟨x.fst, Prod.ext rfl h.symm⟩
theorem ker_snd : ker (snd R M M₂) = range (inl R M M₂) :=
Eq.symm <| range_inl R M M₂
theorem range_inr : range (inr R M M₂) = ker (fst R M M₂) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_ker, mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rfl
· intro h
exact ⟨x.snd, Prod.ext h.symm rfl⟩
theorem ker_fst : ker (fst R M M₂) = range (inr R M M₂) :=
Eq.symm <| range_inr R M M₂
@[simp] theorem fst_comp_inl : fst R M M₂ ∘ₗ inl R M M₂ = id := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_comp_inl : snd R M M₂ ∘ₗ inl R M M₂ = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem fst_comp_inr : fst R M M₂ ∘ₗ inr R M M₂ = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem snd_comp_inr : snd R M M₂ ∘ₗ inr R M M₂ = id := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem coe_inl : (inl R M M₂ : M → M × M₂) = fun x => (x, 0) :=
rfl
theorem inl_apply (x : M) : inl R M M₂ x = (x, 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_inr : (inr R M M₂ : M₂ → M × M₂) = Prod.mk 0 :=
rfl
theorem inr_apply (x : M₂) : inr R M M₂ x = (0, x) :=
rfl
theorem inl_eq_prod : inl R M M₂ = prod LinearMap.id 0 :=
rfl
theorem inr_eq_prod : inr R M M₂ = prod 0 LinearMap.id :=
rfl
theorem inl_injective : Function.Injective (inl R M M₂) := fun _ => by simp
theorem inr_injective : Function.Injective (inr R M M₂) := fun _ => by simp
/-- The coprod function `x : M × M₂ ↦ f x.1 + g x.2` is a linear map. -/
def coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ :=
f.comp (fst _ _ _) + g.comp (snd _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem coprod_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (x : M × M₂) :
coprod f g x = f x.1 + g x.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inl (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (coprod f g).comp (inl R M M₂) = f := by
ext; simp only [map_zero, add_zero, coprod_apply, inl_apply, comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inr (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (coprod f g).comp (inr R M M₂) = g := by
ext; simp only [map_zero, coprod_apply, inr_apply, zero_add, comp_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_inl_inr : coprod (inl R M M₂) (inr R M M₂) = LinearMap.id := by
ext <;>
simp only [Prod.mk_add_mk, add_zero, id_apply, coprod_apply, inl_apply, inr_apply, zero_add]
theorem coprod_zero_left (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₃).coprod g = g.comp (snd R M M₂) :=
zero_add _
theorem coprod_zero_right (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : f.coprod (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) = f.comp (fst R M M₂) :=
add_zero _
theorem comp_coprod (f : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
f.comp (g₁.coprod g₂) = (f.comp g₁).coprod (f.comp g₂) :=
ext fun x => f.map_add (g₁ x.1) (g₂ x.2)
theorem fst_eq_coprod : fst R M M₂ = coprod LinearMap.id 0 := by ext; simp
theorem snd_eq_coprod : snd R M M₂ = coprod 0 LinearMap.id := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem coprod_comp_prod (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (f' : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g' : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(f.coprod g).comp (f'.prod g') = f.comp f' + g.comp g' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coprod_map_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (S : Submodule R M)
(S' : Submodule R M₂) : (Submodule.prod S S').map (LinearMap.coprod f g) = S.map f ⊔ S'.map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [LinearMap.coprod_apply, Submodule.coe_sup, Submodule.map_coe]
rw [← Set.image2_add, Set.image2_image_left, Set.image2_image_right]
exact Set.image_prod fun m m₂ => f m + g m₂
/-- Taking the product of two maps with the same codomain is equivalent to taking the product of
their domains.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def coprodEquiv [Module S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] :
((M →ₗ[R] M₃) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)) ≃ₗ[S] M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ where
toFun f := f.1.coprod f.2
invFun f := (f.comp (inl _ _ _), f.comp (inr _ _ _))
left_inv f := by simp only [coprod_inl, coprod_inr]
right_inv f := by simp only [← comp_coprod, comp_id, coprod_inl_inr]
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp only [Prod.snd_add, add_apply, coprod_apply, Prod.fst_add, add_add_add_comm]
map_smul' r a := by
dsimp
ext
simp only [smul_add, smul_apply, Prod.smul_snd, Prod.smul_fst, coprod_apply]
theorem prod_ext_iff {f g : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} :
f = g ↔ f.comp (inl _ _ _) = g.comp (inl _ _ _) ∧ f.comp (inr _ _ _) = g.comp (inr _ _ _) :=
(coprodEquiv ℕ).symm.injective.eq_iff.symm.trans Prod.ext_iff
/--
Split equality of linear maps from a product into linear maps over each component, to allow `ext`
to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ M₃` and `M₂ →ₗ M₃`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod_ext {f g : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃} (hl : f.comp (inl _ _ _) = g.comp (inl _ _ _))
(hr : f.comp (inr _ _ _) = g.comp (inr _ _ _)) : f = g :=
prod_ext_iff.2 ⟨hl, hr⟩
/-- `Prod.map` of two linear maps. -/
def prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ × M₄ :=
(f.comp (fst R M M₂)).prod (g.comp (snd R M M₂))
theorem coe_prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) : ⇑(f.prodMap g) = Prod.map f g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) : f.prodMap g x = (f x.1, g x.2) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_comap_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) (S : Submodule R M₂)
(S' : Submodule R M₄) :
(Submodule.prod S S').comap (LinearMap.prodMap f g) = (S.comap f).prod (S'.comap g) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.preimage_prod_map_prod f g _ _
theorem ker_prodMap (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
ker (LinearMap.prodMap f g) = Submodule.prod (ker f) (ker g) := by
dsimp only [ker]
rw [← prodMap_comap_prod, Submodule.prod_bot]
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_id : (id : M →ₗ[R] M).prodMap (id : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_one : (1 : M →ₗ[R] M).prodMap (1 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_comp (f₁₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (f₂₃ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₁₂ : M₄ →ₗ[R] M₅)
(g₂₃ : M₅ →ₗ[R] M₆) :
f₂₃.prodMap g₂₃ ∘ₗ f₁₂.prodMap g₁₂ = (f₂₃ ∘ₗ f₁₂).prodMap (g₂₃ ∘ₗ g₁₂) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_mul (f₁₂ : M →ₗ[R] M) (f₂₃ : M →ₗ[R] M) (g₁₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) (g₂₃ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
f₂₃.prodMap g₂₃ * f₁₂.prodMap g₁₂ = (f₂₃ * f₁₂).prodMap (g₂₃ * g₁₂) :=
rfl
theorem prodMap_add (f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g₁ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) (g₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
(f₁ + f₂).prodMap (g₁ + g₂) = f₁.prodMap g₁ + f₂.prodMap g₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_zero : (0 : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prodMap (0 : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodMap_smul [DistribMulAction S M₃] [DistribMulAction S M₄] [SMulCommClass R S M₃]
[SMulCommClass R S M₄] (s : S) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) :
prodMap (s • f) (s • g) = s • prodMap f g :=
rfl
variable (R M M₂ M₃ M₄)
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps]
def prodMapLinear [Module S M₃] [Module S M₄] [SMulCommClass R S M₃] [SMulCommClass R S M₄] :
(M →ₗ[R] M₃) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₄) →ₗ[S] M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃ × M₄ where
toFun f := prodMap f.1 f.2
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as a `RingHom` -/
@[simps]
def prodMapRingHom : (M →ₗ[R] M) × (M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) →+* M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M × M₂ where
toFun f := prodMap f.1 f.2
map_one' := prodMap_one
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
variable {R M M₂ M₃ M₄}
section map_mul
variable {A : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable {B : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
theorem inl_map_mul (a₁ a₂ : A) :
LinearMap.inl R A B (a₁ * a₂) = LinearMap.inl R A B a₁ * LinearMap.inl R A B a₂ :=
Prod.ext rfl (by simp)
theorem inr_map_mul (b₁ b₂ : B) :
LinearMap.inr R A B (b₁ * b₂) = LinearMap.inr R A B b₁ * LinearMap.inr R A B b₂ :=
Prod.ext (by simp) rfl
end map_mul
end LinearMap
end Prod
namespace LinearMap
variable (R M M₂)
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
/-- `LinearMap.prodMap` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps!]
def prodMapAlgHom : Module.End R M × Module.End R M₂ →ₐ[R] Module.End R (M × M₂) :=
{ prodMapRingHom R M M₂ with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
end LinearMap
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
[Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
theorem range_coprod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) : range (f.coprod g) = range f ⊔ range g :=
Submodule.ext fun x => by simp [mem_sup]
theorem isCompl_range_inl_inr : IsCompl (range <| inl R M M₂) (range <| inr R M M₂) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_def]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, inl_apply, inr_apply, mem_bot] at hx hy ⊢
exact ⟨hy.1.symm, hx.2.symm⟩
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ -
simp only [mem_sup, mem_range, exists_prop]
refine ⟨(x, 0), ⟨x, rfl⟩, (0, y), ⟨y, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
simp
theorem sup_range_inl_inr : (range <| inl R M M₂) ⊔ (range <| inr R M M₂) = ⊤ :=
IsCompl.sup_eq_top isCompl_range_inl_inr
theorem disjoint_inl_inr : Disjoint (range <| inl R M M₂) (range <| inr R M M₂) := by
simp +contextual [disjoint_def, @eq_comm M 0, @eq_comm M₂ 0]
theorem map_coprod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : Submodule R M)
(q : Submodule R M₂) : map (coprod f g) (p.prod q) = map f p ⊔ map g q := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 ?_) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 ?_))
· rw [SetLike.le_def]
rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact mem_sup.2 ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, rfl⟩, _, ⟨_, h₂, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
· exact fun x hx => ⟨(x, 0), by simp [hx]⟩
· exact fun x hx => ⟨(0, x), by simp [hx]⟩
theorem comap_prod_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (p : Submodule R M₂)
(q : Submodule R M₃) : comap (prod f g) (p.prod q) = comap f p ⊓ comap g q :=
Submodule.ext fun _x => Iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_inf_comap (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.comap (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) ⊓ q.comap (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) :=
Submodule.ext fun _x => Iff.rfl
theorem prod_eq_sup_map (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂) :
p.prod q = p.map (LinearMap.inl R M M₂) ⊔ q.map (LinearMap.inr R M M₂) := by
rw [← map_coprod_prod, coprod_inl_inr, map_id]
theorem span_inl_union_inr {s : Set M} {t : Set M₂} :
span R (inl R M M₂ '' s ∪ inr R M M₂ '' t) = (span R s).prod (span R t) := by
rw [span_union, prod_eq_sup_map, ← span_image, ← span_image]
@[simp]
theorem ker_prod (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) : ker (prod f g) = ker f ⊓ ker g := by
rw [ker, ← prod_bot, comap_prod_prod]; rfl
theorem range_prod_le (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (g : M →ₗ[R] M₃) :
range (prod f g) ≤ (range f).prod (range g) := by
simp only [SetLike.le_def, prod_apply, mem_range, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_prod, exists_imp]
rintro _ x rfl
exact ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
theorem ker_prod_ker_le_ker_coprod {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂] {M₃ : Type*}
[AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) :
(ker f).prod (ker g) ≤ ker (f.coprod g) := by
rintro ⟨y, z⟩
simp +contextual
theorem ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] {M₃ : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃] (f : M →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃)
(hd : Disjoint (range f) (range g)) : ker (f.coprod g) = (ker f).prod (ker g) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (ker_prod_ker_le_ker_coprod f g)
rintro ⟨y, z⟩ h
simp only [mem_ker, mem_prod, coprod_apply] at h ⊢
have : f y ∈ (range f) ⊓ (range g) := by
simp only [true_and, mem_range, mem_inf, exists_apply_eq_apply]
use -z
rwa [eq_comm, map_neg, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_neg_eq_add]
rw [hd.eq_bot, mem_bot] at this
rw [this] at h
simpa [this] using h
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
theorem sup_eq_range (p q : Submodule R M) : p ⊔ q = range (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype) :=
Submodule.ext fun x => by simp [Submodule.mem_sup, SetLike.exists]
variable (p : Submodule R M) (q : Submodule R M₂)
@[simp]
theorem map_inl : p.map (inl R M M₂) = prod p ⊥ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [and_left_comm, eq_comm, mem_map, Prod.mk_inj, inl_apply, mem_bot, exists_eq_left',
mem_prod]
@[simp]
theorem map_inr : q.map (inr R M M₂) = prod ⊥ q := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem comap_fst : p.comap (fst R M M₂) = prod p ⊤ := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_snd : q.comap (snd R M M₂) = prod ⊤ q := by ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_comap_inl : (prod p q).comap (inl R M M₂) = p := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_comap_inr : (prod p q).comap (inr R M M₂) = q := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_fst : (prod p q).map (fst R M M₂) = p := by
ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ q)]
@[simp]
theorem prod_map_snd : (prod p q).map (snd R M M₂) = q := by
ext x; simp [(⟨0, zero_mem _⟩ : ∃ x, x ∈ p)]
@[simp]
theorem ker_inl : ker (inl R M M₂) = ⊥ := by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inl]
@[simp]
theorem ker_inr : ker (inr R M M₂) = ⊥ := by rw [ker, ← prod_bot, prod_comap_inr]
@[simp]
theorem range_fst : range (fst R M M₂) = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, ← prod_top, prod_map_fst]
@[simp]
theorem range_snd : range (snd R M M₂) = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, ← prod_top, prod_map_snd]
variable (R M M₂)
/-- `M` as a submodule of `M × N`. -/
def fst : Submodule R (M × M₂) :=
(⊥ : Submodule R M₂).comap (LinearMap.snd R M M₂)
/-- `M` as a submodule of `M × N` is isomorphic to `M`. -/
@[simps]
def fstEquiv : Submodule.fst R M M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M where
-- Porting note: proofs were `tidy` or `simp`
toFun x := x.1.1
invFun m := ⟨⟨m, 0⟩, by simp [fst]⟩
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hy⟩
simp only [fst, comap_bot, mem_ker, snd_apply] at hy
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and] using hy.symm
right_inv := by rintro x; rfl
theorem fst_map_fst : (Submodule.fst R M M₂).map (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) = ⊤ := by
aesop
theorem fst_map_snd : (Submodule.fst R M M₂).map (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) = ⊥ := by
aesop (add simp fst)
/-- `N` as a submodule of `M × N`. -/
def snd : Submodule R (M × M₂) :=
(⊥ : Submodule R M).comap (LinearMap.fst R M M₂)
/-- `N` as a submodule of `M × N` is isomorphic to `N`. -/
@[simps]
def sndEquiv : Submodule.snd R M M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ where
-- Porting note: proofs were `tidy` or `simp`
toFun x := x.1.2
invFun n := ⟨⟨0, n⟩, by simp [snd]⟩
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hx⟩
simp only [snd, comap_bot, mem_ker, fst_apply] at hx
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq, and_true] using hx.symm
right_inv := by rintro x; rfl
theorem snd_map_fst : (Submodule.snd R M M₂).map (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) = ⊥ := by
aesop (add simp snd)
theorem snd_map_snd : (Submodule.snd R M M₂).map (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) = ⊤ := by
aesop
theorem fst_sup_snd : Submodule.fst R M M₂ ⊔ Submodule.snd R M M₂ = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro ⟨m, n⟩ -
rw [show (m, n) = (m, 0) + (0, n) by simp]
apply Submodule.add_mem (Submodule.fst R M M₂ ⊔ Submodule.snd R M M₂)
· exact Submodule.mem_sup_left (Submodule.mem_comap.mpr (by simp))
· exact Submodule.mem_sup_right (Submodule.mem_comap.mpr (by simp))
theorem fst_inf_snd : Submodule.fst R M M₂ ⊓ Submodule.snd R M M₂ = ⊥ := by
aesop
theorem le_prod_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} {q : Submodule R (M × M₂)} :
q ≤ p₁.prod p₂ ↔ map (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) q ≤ p₁ ∧ map (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) q ≤ p₂ := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· rintro x ⟨⟨y1, y2⟩, ⟨hy1, rfl⟩⟩
exact (h hy1).1
· rintro x ⟨⟨y1, y2⟩, ⟨hy1, rfl⟩⟩
exact (h hy1).2
· rintro ⟨hH, hK⟩ ⟨x1, x2⟩ h
exact ⟨hH ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, hK ⟨_, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem prod_le_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} {q : Submodule R (M × M₂)} :
p₁.prod p₂ ≤ q ↔ map (LinearMap.inl R M M₂) p₁ ≤ q ∧ map (LinearMap.inr R M M₂) p₂ ≤ q := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
apply h
exact ⟨hx, zero_mem p₂⟩
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
apply h
exact ⟨zero_mem p₁, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨hH, hK⟩ ⟨x1, x2⟩ ⟨h1, h2⟩
have h1' : (LinearMap.inl R _ _) x1 ∈ q := by
apply hH
simpa using h1
have h2' : (LinearMap.inr R _ _) x2 ∈ q := by
apply hK
simpa using h2
simpa using add_mem h1' h2'
theorem prod_eq_bot_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} :
p₁.prod p₂ = ⊥ ↔ p₁ = ⊥ ∧ p₂ = ⊥ := by
simp only [eq_bot_iff, prod_le_iff, (gc_map_comap _).le_iff_le, comap_bot, ker_inl, ker_inr]
theorem prod_eq_top_iff {p₁ : Submodule R M} {p₂ : Submodule R M₂} :
p₁.prod p₂ = ⊤ ↔ p₁ = ⊤ ∧ p₂ = ⊤ := by
simp only [eq_top_iff, le_prod_iff, ← (gc_map_comap _).le_iff_le, map_top, range_fst, range_snd]
end Submodule
namespace LinearEquiv
/-- Product of modules is commutative up to linear isomorphism. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodComm (R M N : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R M]
[Module R N] : (M × N) ≃ₗ[R] N × M :=
{ AddEquiv.prodComm with
toFun := Prod.swap
map_smul' := fun _r ⟨_m, _n⟩ => rfl }
section prodComm
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
theorem fst_comp_prodComm :
(LinearMap.fst R M₂ M).comp (prodComm R M M₂).toLinearMap = (LinearMap.snd R M M₂) := by
ext <;> simp
theorem snd_comp_prodComm :
(LinearMap.snd R M₂ M).comp (prodComm R M M₂).toLinearMap = (LinearMap.fst R M M₂) := by
ext <;> simp
end prodComm
/-- Product of modules is associative up to linear isomorphism. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodAssoc (R M₁ M₂ M₃ : Type*) [Semiring R]
[AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] : ((M₁ × M₂) × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] (M₁ × (M₂ × M₃)) :=
{ AddEquiv.prodAssoc with
map_smul' := fun _r ⟨_m, _n⟩ => rfl }
section prodAssoc
variable {M₁ : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
theorem fst_comp_prodAssoc :
(LinearMap.fst R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)).comp (prodAssoc R M₁ M₂ M₃).toLinearMap =
(LinearMap.fst R M₁ M₂).comp (LinearMap.fst R (M₁ × M₂) M₃) := by
ext <;> simp
theorem snd_comp_prodAssoc :
(LinearMap.snd R M₁ (M₂ × M₃)).comp (prodAssoc R M₁ M₂ M₃).toLinearMap =
(LinearMap.snd R M₁ M₂).prodMap (LinearMap.id : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₃):= by
ext <;> simp
end prodAssoc
section
variable (R M M₂ M₃ M₄)
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄]
/-- Four-way commutativity of `prod`. The name matches `mul_mul_mul_comm`. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodProdProdComm : ((M × M₂) × M₃ × M₄) ≃ₗ[R] (M × M₃) × M₂ × M₄ :=
{ AddEquiv.prodProdProdComm M M₂ M₃ M₄ with
toFun := fun mnmn => ((mnmn.1.1, mnmn.2.1), (mnmn.1.2, mnmn.2.2))
invFun := fun mmnn => ((mmnn.1.1, mmnn.2.1), (mmnn.1.2, mmnn.2.2))
map_smul' := fun _c _mnmn => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem prodProdProdComm_symm :
(prodProdProdComm R M M₂ M₃ M₄).symm = prodProdProdComm R M M₃ M₂ M₄ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodProdProdComm_toAddEquiv :
(prodProdProdComm R M M₂ M₃ M₄ : _ ≃+ _) = AddEquiv.prodProdProdComm M M₂ M₃ M₄ :=
rfl
end
section
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
variable {module_M : Module R M} {module_M₂ : Module R M₂}
variable {module_M₃ : Module R M₃} {module_M₄ : Module R M₄}
variable (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₃ ≃ₗ[R] M₄)
/-- Product of linear equivalences; the maps come from `Equiv.prodCongr`. -/
protected def prodCongr : (M × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ e₁.toAddEquiv.prodCongr e₂.toAddEquiv with
map_smul' := fun c _x => Prod.ext (e₁.map_smulₛₗ c _) (e₂.map_smulₛₗ c _) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-17")] alias prod := LinearEquiv.prodCongr
theorem prodCongr_symm : (e₁.prodCongr e₂).symm = e₁.symm.prodCongr e₂.symm :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-17")] alias prod_symm := prodCongr_symm
@[simp]
theorem prodCongr_apply (p) : e₁.prodCongr e₂ p = (e₁ p.1, e₂ p.2) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-17")] alias prod_apply := prodCongr_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prodCongr :
(e₁.prodCongr e₂ : M × M₃ →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₄) = (e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prodMap (e₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-17")] alias coe_prod := coe_prodCongr
end
section
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommGroup M₄]
variable {module_M : Module R M} {module_M₂ : Module R M₂}
variable {module_M₃ : Module R M₃} {module_M₄ : Module R M₄}
variable (e₁ : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₃ ≃ₗ[R] M₄)
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e₁` and `e₂` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
protected def skewProd (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) ≃ₗ[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ ((e₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).comp (LinearMap.fst R M M₃)).prod
((e₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄).comp (LinearMap.snd R M M₃) +
f.comp (LinearMap.fst R M M₃)) with
invFun := fun p : M₂ × M₄ => (e₁.symm p.1, e₂.symm (p.2 - f (e₁.symm p.1)))
left_inv := fun p => by simp
right_inv := fun p => by simp }
@[simp]
| theorem skewProd_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] M₄) (x) : e₁.skewProd e₂ f x = (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.2 + f x.1) :=
rfl
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Prod.lean | 755 | 757 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
/-!
# Successor and predecessor
This file defines successor and predecessor orders. `succ a`, the successor of an element `a : α` is
the least element greater than `a`. `pred a` is the greatest element less than `a`. Typical examples
include `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℕ+`, `Fin n`, but also `ENat`, the lexicographic order of a successor/predecessor
order...
## Typeclasses
* `SuccOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible successor function.
* `PredOrder`: Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function.
## Implementation notes
Maximal elements don't have a sensible successor. Thus the naïve typeclass
```lean
class NaiveSuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
(succ : α → α)
(succ_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b)
(lt_succ_iff : ∀ {a b}, a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b)
```
can't apply to an `OrderTop` because plugging in `a = b = ⊤` into either of `succ_le_iff` and
`lt_succ_iff` yields `⊤ < ⊤` (or more generally `m < m` for a maximal element `m`).
The solution taken here is to remove the implications `≤ → <` and instead require that `a < succ a`
for all non maximal elements (enforced by the combination of `le_succ` and the contrapositive of
`max_of_succ_le`).
The stricter condition of every element having a sensible successor can be obtained through the
combination of `SuccOrder α` and `NoMaxOrder α`.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Order equipped with a sensible successor function. -/
@[ext]
class SuccOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Successor function -/
succ : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `succ` -/
le_succ : ∀ a, a ≤ succ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `succ` and maximal element -/
max_of_succ_le {a} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a
/-- Proof that `succ a` is the least element greater than `a` -/
succ_le_of_lt {a b} : a < b → succ a ≤ b
/-- Order equipped with a sensible predecessor function. -/
@[ext]
class PredOrder (α : Type*) [Preorder α] where
/-- Predecessor function -/
pred : α → α
/-- Proof of basic ordering with respect to `pred` -/
pred_le : ∀ a, pred a ≤ a
/-- Proof of interaction between `pred` and minimal element -/
min_of_le_pred {a} : a ≤ pred a → IsMin a
/-- Proof that `pred b` is the greatest element less than `b` -/
le_pred_of_lt {a b} : a < b → a ≤ pred b
instance [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] :
PredOrder αᵒᵈ where
pred := toDual ∘ SuccOrder.succ ∘ ofDual
pred_le := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
SuccOrder.le_succ, implies_true]
min_of_le_pred h := by apply SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le h
le_pred_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt h
instance [Preorder α] [PredOrder α] :
SuccOrder αᵒᵈ where
succ := toDual ∘ PredOrder.pred ∘ ofDual
le_succ := by
simp only [comp, OrderDual.forall, ofDual_toDual, toDual_le_toDual,
PredOrder.pred_le, implies_true]
max_of_succ_le h := by apply PredOrder.min_of_le_pred h
succ_le_of_lt := by intro a b h; exact PredOrder.le_pred_of_lt h
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` usable when `α` has no maximal element. -/
def SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (succ : α → α) (hsucc_le_iff : ∀ {a b}, succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b) :
SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
le_succ := fun _ => (hsucc_le_iff.1 le_rfl).le
max_of_succ_le := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hsucc_le_iff.1 ha).elim
succ_le_of_lt := fun h => hsucc_le_iff.2 h }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` usable when `α` has no minimal element. -/
def PredOrder.ofLePredIff (pred : α → α) (hle_pred_iff : ∀ {a b}, a ≤ pred b ↔ a < b) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
pred_le := fun _ => (hle_pred_iff.1 le_rfl).le
min_of_le_pred := fun ha => (lt_irrefl _ <| hle_pred_iff.1 ha).elim
le_pred_of_lt := fun h => hle_pred_iff.2 h }
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
/-- A constructor for `SuccOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def SuccOrder.ofCore (succ : α → α) (hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMax a → ∀ b, a < b ↔ succ a ≤ b)
(hm : ∀ a, IsMax a → succ a = a) : SuccOrder α :=
{ succ
succ_le_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm a h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h b).mp
le_succ := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).symm.le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
max_of_succ_le := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
/-- A constructor for `PredOrder α` for `α` a linear order. -/
@[simps]
def PredOrder.ofCore (pred : α → α)
(hn : ∀ {a}, ¬IsMin a → ∀ b, b ≤ pred a ↔ b < a) (hm : ∀ a, IsMin a → pred a = a) :
PredOrder α :=
{ pred
le_pred_of_lt := fun {a b} =>
by_cases (fun h hab => (hm b h).symm ▸ hab.le) fun h => (hn h a).mpr
pred_le := fun a =>
by_cases (fun h => (hm a h).le) fun h => le_of_lt <| by simpa using (hn h a).not
min_of_le_pred := fun {a} => not_imp_not.mp fun h => by simpa using (hn h a).not }
variable (α)
open Classical in
/-- A well-order is a `SuccOrder`. -/
noncomputable def SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT [WellFoundedLT α] : SuccOrder α :=
ofCore (fun a ↦ if h : (Ioi a).Nonempty then wellFounded_lt.min _ h else a)
(fun ha _ ↦ by
rw [not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp_rw [Set.Nonempty, mem_Ioi, dif_pos ha]
exact ⟨(wellFounded_lt.min_le · ha), lt_of_lt_of_le (wellFounded_lt.min_mem _ ha)⟩)
fun _ ha ↦ dif_neg (not_not_intro ha <| not_isMax_iff.mpr ·)
/-- A linear order with well-founded greater-than relation is a `PredOrder`. -/
noncomputable def PredOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedGT (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedGT α] :
PredOrder α := letI := SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT αᵒᵈ; inferInstanceAs (PredOrder αᵒᵈᵒᵈ)
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Successor order -/
namespace Order
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
/-- The successor of an element. If `a` is not maximal, then `succ a` is the least element greater
than `a`. If `a` is maximal, then `succ a = a`. -/
def succ : α → α :=
SuccOrder.succ
theorem le_succ : ∀ a : α, a ≤ succ a :=
SuccOrder.le_succ
theorem max_of_succ_le {a : α} : succ a ≤ a → IsMax a :=
SuccOrder.max_of_succ_le
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : α} : a < b → succ a ≤ b :=
SuccOrder.succ_le_of_lt
alias _root_.LT.lt.succ_le := succ_le_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff_isMax : succ a ≤ a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨max_of_succ_le, fun h => h <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_root_.IsMax.of_succ_le, _root_.IsMax.succ_le⟩ := succ_le_iff_isMax
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_iff_not_isMax : a < succ a ↔ ¬IsMax a :=
⟨not_isMax_of_lt, fun ha => (le_succ a).lt_of_not_le fun h => ha <| max_of_succ_le h⟩
alias ⟨_, lt_succ_of_not_isMax⟩ := lt_succ_iff_not_isMax
theorem wcovBy_succ (a : α) : a ⩿ succ a :=
⟨le_succ a, fun _ hb => (succ_le_of_lt hb).not_lt⟩
theorem covBy_succ_of_not_isMax (h : ¬IsMax a) : a ⋖ succ a :=
(wcovBy_succ a).covBy_of_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax h
theorem lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (hab : b ≤ a) (ha : ¬IsMax a) : b < succ a :=
hab.trans_lt <| lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha
theorem succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨(lt_succ_of_not_isMax ha).trans_le, succ_le_of_lt⟩
lemma succ_lt_succ_of_not_isMax (h : a < b) (hb : ¬ IsMax b) : succ a < succ b :=
lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax (succ_le_of_lt h) hb
@[simp, mono, gcongr]
theorem succ_le_succ (h : a ≤ b) : succ a ≤ succ b := by
by_cases hb : IsMax b
· by_cases hba : b ≤ a
· exact (hb <| hba.trans <| le_succ _).trans (le_succ _)
· exact succ_le_of_lt ((h.lt_of_not_le hba).trans_le <| le_succ b)
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax fun ha => hb <| ha.mono h]
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem succ_mono : Monotone (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_le_succ
/-- See also `Order.succ_eq_of_covBy`. -/
lemma le_succ_of_wcovBy (h : a ⩿ b) : b ≤ succ a := by
obtain hab | ⟨-, hba⟩ := h.covBy_or_le_and_le
· by_contra hba
exact h.2 (lt_succ_of_not_isMax hab.lt.not_isMax) <| hab.lt.succ_le.lt_of_not_le hba
· exact hba.trans (le_succ _)
alias _root_.WCovBy.le_succ := le_succ_of_wcovBy
theorem le_succ_iterate (k : ℕ) (x : α) : x ≤ succ^[k] x :=
id_le_iterate_of_id_le le_succ _ _
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_lt : n < m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
refine max_of_succ_le (le_trans ?_ h_eq.symm.le)
rw [← iterate_succ_apply' succ]
have h_le : n + 1 ≤ m := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h_lt
exact Monotone.monotone_iterate_of_le_map succ_mono (le_succ a) h_le
theorem isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_ne {n m : ℕ} (h_eq : succ^[n] a = succ^[m] a)
(h_ne : n ≠ m) : IsMax (succ^[n] a) := by
rcases le_total n m with h | h
· exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne)
· rw [h_eq]
exact isMax_iterate_succ_of_eq_of_lt h_eq.symm (lt_of_le_of_ne h h_ne.symm)
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) :=
fun _ => (lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · ha)
theorem Ici_succ_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Set.ext fun _ => succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax h hb
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax (hb : ¬IsMax b) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
gcongr
intro _ h
apply Iic_subset_Iio_succ_of_not_isMax hb h
theorem Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iic]
theorem Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax (ha : ¬IsMax a) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, Ici_succ_of_not_isMax ha, Ioi_inter_Iio]
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem lt_succ (a : α) : a < succ a :=
lt_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[simp]
theorem lt_succ_of_le : a ≤ b → a < succ b :=
(lt_succ_of_le_of_not_isMax · <| not_isMax b)
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_iff : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
@[gcongr] theorem succ_lt_succ (hab : a < b) : succ a < succ b := by simp [hab]
theorem succ_strictMono : StrictMono (succ : α → α) := fun _ _ => succ_lt_succ
theorem covBy_succ (a : α) : a ⋖ succ a :=
covBy_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax a
theorem Iic_subset_Iio_succ (a : α) : Iic a ⊆ Iio (succ a) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_succ (a : α) : Ici (succ a) = Ioi a :=
Ici_succ_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right (a b : α) : Icc a b ⊆ Ico a (succ b) :=
Icc_subset_Ico_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioo a (succ b) :=
Ioc_subset_Ioo_succ_right_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_succ_left (a b : α) : Icc (succ a) b = Ioc a b :=
Icc_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
@[simp]
theorem Ico_succ_left (a b : α) : Ico (succ a) b = Ioo a b :=
Ico_succ_left_of_not_isMax <| not_isMax _
end NoMaxOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [SuccOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem succ_eq_iff_isMax : succ a = a ↔ IsMax a :=
⟨fun h => max_of_succ_le h.le, fun h => h.eq_of_ge <| le_succ _⟩
alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.succ_eq⟩ := succ_eq_iff_isMax
lemma le_iff_eq_or_succ_le : a ≤ b ↔ a = b ∨ succ a ≤ b := by
by_cases ha : IsMax a
· simpa [ha.succ_eq] using le_of_eq
· rw [succ_le_iff_of_not_isMax ha, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem le_le_succ_iff : a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ succ a ↔ b = a ∨ b = succ a := by
| refine
⟨fun h =>
| Mathlib/Order/SuccPred/Basic.lean | 331 | 332 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Junyan Xu, Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AsSubring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Spectrum.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Basic
/-!
# Valuation subrings of a field
## Projects
The order structure on `ValuationSubring K`.
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (K : Type u) [Field K]
/-- A valuation subring of a field `K` is a subring `A` such that for every `x : K`,
either `x ∈ A` or `x⁻¹ ∈ A`.
This is equivalent to being maximal in the domination order
of local subrings (the stacks project definition). See `LocalSubring.isMax_iff`.
-/
structure ValuationSubring extends Subring K where
mem_or_inv_mem' : ∀ x : K, x ∈ carrier ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
instance : SetLike (ValuationSubring K) K where
coe A := A.toSubring
coe_injective' := by
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
replace h := SetLike.coe_injective' h
congr
theorem mem_carrier (x : K) : x ∈ A.carrier ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubring (x : K) : x ∈ A.toSubring ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
@[ext]
theorem ext (A B : ValuationSubring K) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) : A = B := SetLike.ext h
theorem zero_mem : (0 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.one_mem
theorem add_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x + y ∈ A := A.toSubring.add_mem
theorem mul_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x * y ∈ A := A.toSubring.mul_mem
theorem neg_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A → -x ∈ A := A.toSubring.neg_mem
theorem mem_or_inv_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ A := A.mem_or_inv_mem' _
instance : SubringClass (ValuationSubring K) K where
zero_mem := zero_mem
add_mem {_} a b := add_mem _ a b
one_mem := one_mem
mul_mem {_} a b := mul_mem _ a b
neg_mem {_} x := neg_mem _ x
theorem toSubring_injective : Function.Injective (toSubring : ValuationSubring K → Subring K) :=
fun x y h => by cases x; cases y; congr
instance : CommRing A :=
show CommRing A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : IsDomain A :=
show IsDomain A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : Top (ValuationSubring K) :=
Top.mk <| { (⊤ : Subring K) with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun _ => Or.inl trivial }
theorem mem_top (x : K) : x ∈ (⊤ : ValuationSubring K) :=
trivial
theorem le_top : A ≤ ⊤ := fun _a _ha => mem_top _
instance : OrderTop (ValuationSubring K) where
top := ⊤
le_top := le_top
instance : Inhabited (ValuationSubring K) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : ValuationRing A where
cond' a b := by
by_cases h : (b : K) = 0
· use 0
left
ext
simp [h]
by_cases h : (a : K) = 0
· use 0; right
ext
simp [h]
rcases A.mem_or_inv_mem (a / b) with hh | hh
· use ⟨a / b, hh⟩
right
ext
field_simp
· rw [show (a / b : K)⁻¹ = b / a by field_simp] at hh
use ⟨b / a, hh⟩
left
ext
field_simp
instance : Algebra A K :=
show Algebra A.toSubring K by infer_instance
-- Porting note: Somehow it cannot find this instance and I'm too lazy to debug. wrong prio?
instance isLocalRing : IsLocalRing A := ValuationRing.isLocalRing A
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (a : A) : algebraMap A K a = a := rfl
instance : IsFractionRing A K where
map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(Units.mk0 (y : K) fun c => nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hy <| Subtype.ext c).isUnit
surj' z := by
by_cases h : z = 0; · use (0, 1); simp [h]
rcases A.mem_or_inv_mem z with hh | hh
· use (⟨z, hh⟩, 1); simp
· refine ⟨⟨1, ⟨⟨_, hh⟩, ?_⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel₀ h⟩
exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun c => h (inv_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg Subtype.val c))
exists_of_eq {a b} h := ⟨1, by ext; simpa using h⟩
/-- The value group of the valuation associated to `A`. Note: it is actually a group with zero. -/
def ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.ValueGroup A K
-- The `LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (ValueGroup A) := by
unfold ValueGroup
infer_instance
/-- Any valuation subring of `K` induces a natural valuation on `K`. -/
def valuation : Valuation K A.ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.valuation A K
instance inhabitedValueGroup : Inhabited A.ValueGroup := ⟨A.valuation 0⟩
theorem valuation_le_one (a : A) : A.valuation a ≤ 1 :=
(ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K _).2 ⟨a, rfl⟩
theorem mem_of_valuation_le_one (x : K) (h : A.valuation x ≤ 1) : x ∈ A :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K x).1 h
ha ▸ a.2
theorem valuation_le_one_iff (x : K) : A.valuation x ≤ 1 ↔ x ∈ A :=
⟨mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _, fun ha => A.valuation_le_one ⟨x, ha⟩⟩
theorem valuation_eq_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x = A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : Aˣ, (a : K) * y = x :=
Quotient.eq''
theorem valuation_le_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x ≤ A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : A, (a : K) * y = x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem valuation_surjective : Function.Surjective A.valuation := Quot.mk_surjective
theorem valuation_unit (a : Aˣ) : A.valuation a = 1 := by
rw [← A.valuation.map_one, valuation_eq_iff]; use a; simp
theorem valuation_eq_one_iff (a : A) : IsUnit a ↔ A.valuation a = 1 :=
⟨fun h => A.valuation_unit h.unit, fun h => by
have ha : (a : K) ≠ 0 := by
intro c
rw [c, A.valuation.map_zero] at h
exact zero_ne_one h
have ha' : (a : K)⁻¹ ∈ A := by rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, h, inv_one]
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one a ⟨a⁻¹, ha'⟩; ext; field_simp⟩
theorem valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one (a : A) : A.valuation a < 1 ∨ A.valuation a = 1 :=
lt_or_eq_of_le (A.valuation_le_one a)
theorem valuation_lt_one_iff (a : A) : a ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A ↔ A.valuation a < 1 := by
rw [IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal]
dsimp [nonunits]; rw [valuation_eq_one_iff]
exact (A.valuation_le_one a).lt_iff_ne.symm
/-- A subring `R` of `K` such that for all `x : K` either `x ∈ R` or `x⁻¹ ∈ R` is
a valuation subring of `K`. -/
def ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ R with mem_or_inv_mem' := hR }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofSubring (R : Subring K) (hR : ∀ x : K, x ∈ R ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ R) (x : K) :
x ∈ ofSubring R hR ↔ x ∈ R :=
Iff.refl _
/-- An overring of a valuation ring is a valuation ring. -/
def ofLE (R : ValuationSubring K) (S : Subring K) (h : R.toSubring ≤ S) : ValuationSubring K :=
{ S with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun x => (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).imp (@h x) (@h _) }
section Order
instance : SemilatticeSup (ValuationSubring K) :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder (ValuationSubring K)) with
sup := fun R S => ofLE R (R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) <| le_sup_left
le_sup_left := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_left : R.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
le_sup_right := fun R S _ hx => (le_sup_right : S.toSubring ≤ R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring) hx
sup_le := fun R S T hR hT _ hx => (sup_le hR hT : R.toSubring ⊔ S.toSubring ≤ T.toSubring) hx }
/-- The ring homomorphism induced by the partial order. -/
def inclusion (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R →+* S :=
Subring.inclusion h
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from a valuation ring to its field of fractions. -/
def subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : R →+* K :=
Subring.subtype R.toSubring
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply {R : ValuationSubring K} (x : R) :
R.subtype x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective (R : ValuationSubring K) :
Function.Injective R.subtype :=
R.toSubring.subtype_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype (R : ValuationSubring K) : ⇑(subtype R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
/-- The canonical map on value groups induced by a coarsening of valuation rings. -/
def mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : R.ValueGroup →*₀ S.ValueGroup where
toFun := Quotient.map' id fun _ _ ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨Units.map (R.inclusion S h).toMonoidHom u, hu⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl
@[mono]
theorem monotone_mapOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Monotone (R.mapOfLE S h) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨a, ha⟩; exact ⟨R.inclusion S h a, ha⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapOfLE_comp_valuation (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
R.mapOfLE S h ∘ R.valuation = S.valuation := by ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapOfLE_valuation_apply (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) (x : K) :
R.mapOfLE S h (R.valuation x) = S.valuation x := rfl
/-- The ideal corresponding to a coarsening of a valuation ring. -/
def idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : Ideal R :=
(IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal S).comap (R.inclusion S h)
instance prime_idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) : (idealOfLE R S h).IsPrime :=
(IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal S).comap_isPrime _
/-- The coarsening of a valuation ring associated to a prime ideal. -/
def ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] : ValuationSubring K :=
ofLE A (Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors).toSubring
fun a ha => Subalgebra.mem_toSubring.mpr <|
Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem
(Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors) (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
instance ofPrimeAlgebra (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
Algebra A (A.ofPrime P) :=
Subalgebra.algebra (Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors)
instance ofPrime_scalar_tower (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
letI : SMul A (A.ofPrime P) := SMulZeroClass.toSMul
IsScalarTower A (A.ofPrime P) K :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra' A K K
(Localization.subalgebra.ofField K _ P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors)
instance ofPrime_localization (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (A.ofPrime P) P := by
apply
Localization.subalgebra.isLocalization_ofField K P.primeCompl
P.primeCompl_le_nonZeroDivisors
theorem le_ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] : A ≤ ofPrime A P :=
fun a ha => Subalgebra.mem_toSubring.mpr <| Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ (⟨a, ha⟩ : A)
theorem ofPrime_valuation_eq_one_iff_mem_primeCompl (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A)
[P.IsPrime] (x : A) : (ofPrime A P).valuation x = 1 ↔ x ∈ P.primeCompl := by
rw [← IsLocalization.AtPrime.isUnit_to_map_iff (A.ofPrime P) P x, valuation_eq_one_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem idealOfLE_ofPrime (A : ValuationSubring K) (P : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] :
idealOfLE A (ofPrime A P) (le_ofPrime A P) = P := by
refine Ideal.ext (fun x => ?_)
apply IsLocalization.AtPrime.to_map_mem_maximal_iff
exact isLocalRing (ofPrime A P)
@[simp]
theorem ofPrime_idealOfLE (R S : ValuationSubring K) (h : R ≤ S) :
ofPrime R (idealOfLE R S h) = S := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, r, hr, rfl⟩; apply mul_mem; · exact h a.2
· rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, ← inv_one, inv_le_inv₀]
· exact not_lt.1 ((not_iff_not.2 <| valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hr)
· simpa [Valuation.pos_iff] using fun hr₀ ↦ hr₀ ▸ hr <| Ideal.zero_mem (R.idealOfLE S h)
· exact zero_lt_one
· intro hx; by_cases hr : x ∈ R; · exact R.le_ofPrime _ hr
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => hr (by rw [h]; exact R.zero_mem)
replace hr := (R.mem_or_inv_mem x).resolve_left hr
refine ⟨1, ⟨x⁻¹, hr⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [Ideal.primeCompl, Submonoid.mem_mk, Subsemigroup.mem_mk, Set.mem_compl_iff,
SetLike.mem_coe, idealOfLE, Ideal.mem_comap, IsLocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal, mem_nonunits_iff,
not_not]
change IsUnit (⟨x⁻¹, h hr⟩ : S)
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (⟨x, hx⟩ : S)
ext; field_simp
· field_simp
theorem ofPrime_le_of_le (P Q : Ideal A) [P.IsPrime] [Q.IsPrime] (h : P ≤ Q) :
ofPrime A Q ≤ ofPrime A P := fun _x ⟨a, s, hs, he⟩ => ⟨a, s, fun c => hs (h c), he⟩
theorem idealOfLE_le_of_le (R S : ValuationSubring K) (hR : A ≤ R) (hS : A ≤ S) (h : R ≤ S) :
idealOfLE A S hS ≤ idealOfLE A R hR := fun x hx =>
(valuation_lt_one_iff R _).2
(by
by_contra c; push_neg at c; replace c := monotone_mapOfLE R S h c
rw [(mapOfLE _ _ _).map_one, mapOfLE_valuation_apply] at c
apply not_le_of_lt ((valuation_lt_one_iff S _).1 hx) c)
/-- The equivalence between coarsenings of a valuation ring and its prime ideals. -/
@[simps apply]
def primeSpectrumEquiv : PrimeSpectrum A ≃ {S // A ≤ S} where
toFun P := ⟨ofPrime A P.asIdeal, le_ofPrime _ _⟩
invFun S := ⟨idealOfLE _ S S.2, inferInstance⟩
left_inv P := by ext1; simp
right_inv S := by ext1; simp
/-- An ordered variant of `primeSpectrumEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def primeSpectrumOrderEquiv : (PrimeSpectrum A)ᵒᵈ ≃o {S // A ≤ S} :=
{ OrderDual.ofDual.trans (primeSpectrumEquiv A) with
map_rel_iff' {a b} :=
⟨a.rec <| fun a => b.rec <| fun b => fun h => by
simp only [OrderDual.toDual_le_toDual]
dsimp at h
have := idealOfLE_le_of_le A _ _ ?_ ?_ h
· rwa [idealOfLE_ofPrime, idealOfLE_ofPrime] at this
all_goals exact le_ofPrime A (PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal _),
fun h => by apply ofPrime_le_of_le; exact h⟩ }
instance le_total_ideal : IsTotal {S // A ≤ S} LE.le := by
classical
let _ : IsTotal (PrimeSpectrum A) (· ≤ ·) := ⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ => LE.isTotal.total x y⟩
exact ⟨(primeSpectrumOrderEquiv A).symm.toRelEmbedding.isTotal.total⟩
open scoped Classical in
instance linearOrderOverring : LinearOrder {S // A ≤ S} where
le_total := (le_total_ideal A).1
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ sup_eq_maxDefault a b
toDecidableLE := _
end Order
end ValuationSubring
namespace Valuation
variable {K}
variable {Γ Γ₁ Γ₂ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ]
[LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₁] [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₂] (v : Valuation K Γ)
(v₁ : Valuation K Γ₁) (v₂ : Valuation K Γ₂)
/-- The valuation subring associated to a valuation. -/
def valuationSubring : ValuationSubring K :=
{ v.integer with
mem_or_inv_mem' := by
intro x
rcases val_le_one_or_val_inv_le_one v x with h | h
exacts [Or.inl h, Or.inr h] }
@[simp]
theorem mem_valuationSubring_iff (x : K) : x ∈ v.valuationSubring ↔ v x ≤ 1 := Iff.refl _
theorem isEquiv_iff_valuationSubring :
v₁.IsEquiv v₂ ↔ v₁.valuationSubring = v₂.valuationSubring := by
constructor
· intro h; ext x; specialize h x 1; simpa using h
· intro h; apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
intro x
have : x ∈ v₁.valuationSubring ↔ x ∈ v₂.valuationSubring := by rw [h]
simpa using this
theorem isEquiv_valuation_valuationSubring : v.IsEquiv v.valuationSubring.valuation := by
rw [isEquiv_iff_val_le_one]
intro x
rw [ValuationSubring.valuation_le_one_iff]
rfl
end Valuation
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
@[simp]
theorem valuationSubring_valuation : A.valuation.valuationSubring = A := by
ext; rw [← A.valuation_le_one_iff]; rfl
section UnitGroup
/-- The unit group of a valuation subring, as a subgroup of `Kˣ`. -/
def unitGroup : Subgroup Kˣ :=
(A.valuation.toMonoidWithZeroHom.toMonoidHom.comp (Units.coeHom K)).ker
@[simp]
theorem mem_unitGroup_iff (x : Kˣ) : x ∈ A.unitGroup ↔ A.valuation x = 1 := Iff.rfl
/-- For a valuation subring `A`, `A.unitGroup` agrees with the units of `A`. -/
def unitGroupMulEquiv : A.unitGroup ≃* Aˣ where
toFun x :=
{ val := ⟨(x : Kˣ), mem_of_valuation_le_one A _ x.prop.le⟩
inv := ⟨((x⁻¹ : A.unitGroup) : Kˣ), mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _ x⁻¹.prop.le⟩
-- Porting note: was `Units.mul_inv x`
val_inv := Subtype.ext (by simp)
-- Porting note: was `Units.inv_mul x`
inv_val := Subtype.ext (by simp) }
invFun x := ⟨Units.map A.subtype.toMonoidHom x, A.valuation_unit x⟩
left_inv a := by ext; rfl
right_inv a := by ext; rfl
map_mul' a b := by ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitGroupMulEquiv_apply (a : A.unitGroup) :
((A.unitGroupMulEquiv a : A) : K) = ((a : Kˣ) : K) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitGroupMulEquiv_symm_apply (a : Aˣ) : ((A.unitGroupMulEquiv.symm a : Kˣ) : K) = a :=
rfl
theorem unitGroup_le_unitGroup {A B : ValuationSubring K} : A.unitGroup ≤ B.unitGroup ↔ A ≤ B := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rw [← A.valuation_le_one_iff x, le_iff_lt_or_eq] at hx
by_cases h_1 : x = 0; · simp only [h_1, zero_mem]
by_cases h_2 : 1 + x = 0
· simp only [← add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq.1 h_2, neg_mem _ _ (one_mem _)]
rcases hx with hx | hx
· have := h (show Units.mk0 _ h_2 ∈ A.unitGroup from A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt hx)
simpa using
B.add_mem _ _ (show 1 + x ∈ B from SetLike.coe_mem (B.unitGroupMulEquiv ⟨_, this⟩ : B))
(B.neg_mem _ B.one_mem)
· have := h (show Units.mk0 x h_1 ∈ A.unitGroup from hx)
exact SetLike.coe_mem (B.unitGroupMulEquiv ⟨_, this⟩ : B)
· rintro h x (hx : A.valuation x = 1)
apply_fun A.mapOfLE B h at hx
simpa using hx
theorem unitGroup_injective : Function.Injective (unitGroup : ValuationSubring K → Subgroup _) :=
fun A B h => by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, unitGroup_le_unitGroup] using h
theorem eq_iff_unitGroup {A B : ValuationSubring K} : A = B ↔ A.unitGroup = B.unitGroup :=
unitGroup_injective.eq_iff.symm
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their unit groups is an order embedding. -/
def unitGroupOrderEmbedding : ValuationSubring K ↪o Subgroup Kˣ where
toFun A := A.unitGroup
inj' := unitGroup_injective
map_rel_iff' {_A _B} := unitGroup_le_unitGroup
theorem unitGroup_strictMono : StrictMono (unitGroup : ValuationSubring K → Subgroup _) :=
unitGroupOrderEmbedding.strictMono
end UnitGroup
section nonunits
/-- The nonunits of a valuation subring of `K`, as a subsemigroup of `K` -/
def nonunits : Subsemigroup K where
carrier := {x | A.valuation x < 1}
-- Porting note: added `Set.mem_setOf.mp`
mul_mem' ha hb := (mul_lt_mul'' (Set.mem_setOf.mp ha) (Set.mem_setOf.mp hb)
zero_le' zero_le').trans_eq <| mul_one _
theorem mem_nonunits_iff {x : K} : x ∈ A.nonunits ↔ A.valuation x < 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonunits_le_nonunits {A B : ValuationSubring K} : B.nonunits ≤ A.nonunits ↔ A ≤ B := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
by_cases h_1 : x = 0; · simp only [h_1, zero_mem]
rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, ← not_lt, Valuation.one_lt_val_iff _ h_1] at hx ⊢
by_contra h_2; exact hx (h h_2)
· intro h x hx
by_contra h_1; exact not_lt.2 (monotone_mapOfLE _ _ h (not_lt.1 h_1)) hx
theorem nonunits_injective : Function.Injective (nonunits : ValuationSubring K → Subsemigroup _) :=
fun A B h => by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, nonunits_le_nonunits] using h.symm
theorem nonunits_inj {A B : ValuationSubring K} : A.nonunits = B.nonunits ↔ A = B :=
nonunits_injective.eq_iff
/-- The map on valuation subrings to their nonunits is a dual order embedding. -/
def nonunitsOrderEmbedding : ValuationSubring K ↪o (Subsemigroup K)ᵒᵈ where
toFun A := A.nonunits
inj' := nonunits_injective
map_rel_iff' {_A _B} := nonunits_le_nonunits
variable {A}
/-- The elements of `A.nonunits` are those of the maximal ideal of `A` after coercion to `K`.
See also `mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximalIdeal`, which gets rid of the coercion to `K`,
at the expense of a more complicated right hand side.
-/
theorem coe_mem_nonunits_iff {a : A} : (a : K) ∈ A.nonunits ↔ a ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A :=
(valuation_lt_one_iff _ _).symm
theorem nonunits_le : A.nonunits ≤ A.toSubring.toSubmonoid.toSubsemigroup := fun _a ha =>
(A.valuation_le_one_iff _).mp (A.mem_nonunits_iff.mp ha).le
theorem nonunits_subset : (A.nonunits : Set K) ⊆ A :=
nonunits_le
/-- The elements of `A.nonunits` are those of the maximal ideal of `A`.
See also `coe_mem_nonunits_iff`, which has a simpler right hand side but requires the element
to be in `A` already.
-/
theorem mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximalIdeal {a : K} :
a ∈ A.nonunits ↔ ∃ ha, (⟨a, ha⟩ : A) ∈ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A :=
⟨fun h => ⟨nonunits_subset h, coe_mem_nonunits_iff.mp h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ =>
coe_mem_nonunits_iff.mpr h⟩
/-- `A.nonunits` agrees with the maximal ideal of `A`, after taking its image in `K`. -/
theorem image_maximalIdeal : ((↑) : A → K) '' IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A = A.nonunits := by
ext a
simp only [Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_nonunits_iff_exists_mem_maximalIdeal]
rw [Subtype.exists]
simp_rw [exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
end nonunits
section PrincipalUnitGroup
/-- The principal unit group of a valuation subring, as a subgroup of `Kˣ`. -/
def principalUnitGroup : Subgroup Kˣ where
carrier := {x | A.valuation (x - 1) < 1}
mul_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb
-- Porting note: added
rw [Set.mem_setOf] at ha hb
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (max_lt hb ha)
-- Porting note: `sub_add_sub_cancel` needed some help
rw [← one_mul (A.valuation (b - 1)), ← A.valuation.map_one_add_of_lt ha, add_sub_cancel,
← Valuation.map_mul, mul_sub_one, ← sub_add_sub_cancel (↑(a * b) : K) _ 1]
exact A.valuation.map_add _ _
| one_mem' := by simp
inv_mem' := by
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/ValuationSubring.lean | 564 | 565 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Commute
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Even and odd elements in rings
This file defines odd elements and proves some general facts about even and odd elements of rings.
As opposed to `Even`, `Odd` does not have a multiplicative counterpart.
## TODO
Try to generalize `Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas whose `Semiring`
assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary. If that turns out to be true, they could be moved
to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even`.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even` for the definition of even elements.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered OrderedRing
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma Even.neg_pow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a
simp_rw [← two_mul, pow_mul, neg_sq]
lemma Even.neg_one_pow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a : α} {n : ℤ}
lemma Even.neg_zpow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [← Int.two_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_two, neg_mul_neg]
lemma Even.neg_one_zpow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_zpow, one_zpow]
end DivisionMonoid
@[simp] lemma IsSquare.zero [MulZeroClass α] : IsSquare (0 : α) := ⟨0, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [Semiring β] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma even_iff_exists_two_mul : Even a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b := by simp [even_iff_exists_two_nsmul]
lemma even_iff_two_dvd : Even a ↔ 2 ∣ a := by simp [Even, Dvd.dvd, two_mul]
alias ⟨Even.two_dvd, _⟩ := even_iff_two_dvd
lemma Even.trans_dvd (ha : Even a) (hab : a ∣ b) : Even b :=
even_iff_two_dvd.2 <| ha.two_dvd.trans hab
lemma Dvd.dvd.even (hab : a ∣ b) (ha : Even a) : Even b := ha.trans_dvd hab
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul (α) [NonAssocSemiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x) = {a | Even a} := by
ext x
simp [eq_comm, two_mul, Even]
@[simp] lemma even_two : Even (2 : α) := ⟨1, by rw [one_add_one_eq_two]⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_left (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (b * a) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft _)
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_right (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (a * b) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight _)
lemma even_two_mul (a : α) : Even (2 * a) := ⟨a, two_mul _⟩
lemma Even.pow_of_ne_zero (ha : Even a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → Even (a ^ n)
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.mul_left _
/-- An element `a` of a semiring is odd if there exists `k` such `a = 2*k + 1`. -/
def Odd (a : α) : Prop := ∃ k, a = 2 * k + 1
lemma odd_iff_exists_bit1 : Odd a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b + 1 := exists_congr fun b ↦ by rw [two_mul]
alias ⟨Odd.exists_bit1, _⟩ := odd_iff_exists_bit1
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul_add_one (α : Type*) [Semiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x + 1) = {a | Odd a} := by ext x; simp [Odd, eq_comm]
lemma Even.add_odd : Even a → Odd b → Odd (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨a + b, by rw [mul_add, ← two_mul, add_assoc]⟩
lemma Even.odd_add (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (b + a) := add_comm a b ▸ ha.add_odd hb
lemma Odd.add_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a + b) := add_comm a b ▸ hb.add_odd ha
lemma Odd.add_odd : Odd a → Odd b → Even (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a + b + 1, ?_⟩
rw [two_mul, two_mul]
ac_rfl
@[simp] lemma odd_one : Odd (1 : α) :=
⟨0, (zero_add _).symm.trans (congr_arg (· + (1 : α)) (mul_zero _).symm)⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.add_one (h : Even a) : Odd (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Even.one_add (h : Even a) : Odd (1 + a) := h.odd_add odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.add_one (h : Odd a) : Even (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.one_add (h : Odd a) : Even (1 + a) := odd_one.add_odd h
lemma odd_two_mul_add_one (a : α) : Odd (2 * a + 1) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma odd_add_self_one' : Odd (a + (a + 1)) := by simp [← add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self : Odd (a + 1 + a) := by simp [add_comm _ a]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self' : Odd (a + (1 + a)) := by simp [add_comm 1 a]
lemma Odd.map [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] (f : F) : Odd a → Odd (f a) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨f a, by simp [two_mul]⟩
lemma Odd.natCast {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Odd (n : R) :=
hn.map <| Nat.castRingHom R
@[simp] lemma Odd.mul : Odd a → Odd b → Odd (a * b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨2 * a * b + b + a, ?_⟩
rw [mul_add, add_mul, mul_one, ← add_assoc, one_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc,
← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_comm]
lemma Odd.pow (ha : Odd a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Odd (a ^ n)
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact odd_one
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.pow.mul ha
lemma Odd.pow_add_pow_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd α] (hn : Odd n) (hab : a + b = 0) :
a ^ n + b ^ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
induction k with | zero => simpa | succ k ih => ?_
have : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := add_right_cancel <|
calc
a ^ 2 + a * b = 0 := by rw [sq, ← mul_add, hab, mul_zero]
_ = b ^ 2 + a * b := by rw [sq, ← add_mul, add_comm, hab, zero_mul]
refine add_right_cancel (b := b ^ (2 * k + 1) * a ^ 2) ?_
calc
_ = (a ^ (2 * k + 1) + b ^ (2 * k + 1)) * a ^ 2 + b ^ (2 * k + 3) := by
rw [add_mul, ← pow_add, add_right_comm]; rfl
_ = _ := by rw [ih, zero_mul, zero_add, zero_add, this, ← pow_add]
end Semiring
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ}
lemma Odd.neg_pow : Odd n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = -a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [pow_add, pow_mul, neg_sq, pow_one, mul_neg]
@[simp] lemma Odd.neg_one_pow (h : Odd n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = -1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section Ring
variable [Ring α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ}
lemma even_neg_two : Even (-2 : α) := by simp only [even_neg, even_two]
lemma Odd.neg (hp : Odd a) : Odd (-a) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hp
use -(k + 1)
rw [mul_neg, mul_add, neg_add, add_assoc, two_mul (1 : α), neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right,
← neg_add, hk]
@[simp] lemma odd_neg : Odd (-a) ↔ Odd a := ⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg a ▸ h.neg, Odd.neg⟩
lemma odd_neg_one : Odd (-1 : α) := by simp
lemma Odd.sub_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_even hb.neg
lemma Even.sub_odd (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
lemma Odd.sub_odd (ha : Odd a) (hb : Odd b) : Even (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
end Ring
namespace Nat
variable {m n : ℕ}
lemma odd_iff : Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ↦ by omega, fun h ↦ ⟨n / 2, (mod_add_div n 2).symm.trans (by rw [h, add_comm])⟩⟩
instance : DecidablePred (Odd : ℕ → Prop) := fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ odd_iff.symm
lemma not_odd_iff : ¬Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 0 := by rw [odd_iff, mod_two_not_eq_one]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_iff_even : ¬Odd n ↔ Even n := by rw [not_odd_iff, even_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_even_iff_odd : ¬Even n ↔ Odd n := by rw [not_even_iff, odd_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_zero : ¬Odd 0 := not_odd_iff.mpr rfl
lemma _root_.Odd.not_two_dvd_nat (h : Odd n) : ¬(2 ∣ n) := by
rwa [← even_iff_two_dvd, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma even_xor_odd (n : ℕ) : Xor' (Even n) (Odd n) := by
simp [Xor', ← not_even_iff_odd, Decidable.em (Even n)]
lemma even_or_odd (n : ℕ) : Even n ∨ Odd n := (even_xor_odd n).or
lemma even_or_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, n = 2 * k ∨ n = 2 * k + 1 := by
simpa only [← two_mul, exists_or, Odd, Even] using even_or_odd n
lemma even_xor_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, Xor' (n = 2 * k) (n = 2 * k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ | ⟨k, rfl⟩ := even_or_odd n <;> use k
· simpa only [← two_mul, eq_self_iff_true, xor_true] using (succ_ne_self (2 * k)).symm
· simpa only [xor_true, xor_comm] using (succ_ne_self _)
lemma odd_add_one {n : ℕ} : Odd (n + 1) ↔ ¬ Odd n := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, Nat.even_add_one, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : m % 2 + (m + n) % 2 = 1 :=
((even_or_odd m).elim fun hm ↦ by rw [even_iff.1 hm, odd_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]) fun hm ↦ by
rw [odd_iff.1 hm, even_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]
@[simp] lemma mod_two_add_succ_mod_two (m : ℕ) : m % 2 + (m + 1) % 2 = 1 :=
mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two m odd_one
@[simp] lemma succ_mod_two_add_mod_two (m : ℕ) : (m + 1) % 2 + m % 2 = 1 := by
rw [add_comm, mod_two_add_succ_mod_two]
lemma even_add' : Even (m + n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Odd n) := by
rw [even_add, ← not_odd_iff_even, ← not_odd_iff_even, not_iff_not]
@[simp] lemma not_even_bit1 (n : ℕ) : ¬Even (2 * n + 1) := by simp [parity_simps]
lemma not_even_two_mul_add_one (n : ℕ) : ¬ Even (2 * n + 1) :=
not_even_iff_odd.2 <| odd_two_mul_add_one n
lemma even_sub' (h : n ≤ m) : Even (m - n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Odd n) := by
rw [even_sub h, ← not_odd_iff_even, ← not_odd_iff_even, not_iff_not]
lemma Odd.sub_odd (hm : Odd m) (hn : Odd n) : Even (m - n) :=
(le_total n m).elim (fun h ↦ by simp only [even_sub' h, *]) fun h ↦ by
simp only [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Even.zero]
alias _root_.Odd.tsub_odd := Nat.Odd.sub_odd
lemma odd_mul : Odd (m * n) ↔ Odd m ∧ Odd n := by simp [not_or, even_mul, ← not_even_iff_odd]
lemma Odd.of_mul_left (h : Odd (m * n)) : Odd m :=
(odd_mul.mp h).1
lemma Odd.of_mul_right (h : Odd (m * n)) : Odd n :=
(odd_mul.mp h).2
lemma even_div : Even (m / n) ↔ m % (2 * n) / n = 0 := by
rw [even_iff_two_dvd, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ← Nat.mod_mul_right_div_self, mul_comm]
@[parity_simps] lemma odd_add : Odd (m + n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Even n) := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, even_add, not_iff, ← not_even_iff_odd]
lemma odd_add' : Odd (m + n) ↔ (Odd n ↔ Even m) := by rw [add_comm, odd_add]
lemma ne_of_odd_add (h : Odd (m + n)) : m ≠ n := by rintro rfl; simp [← not_even_iff_odd] at h
@[parity_simps] lemma odd_sub (h : n ≤ m) : Odd (m - n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Even n) := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, even_sub h, not_iff, ← not_even_iff_odd]
lemma Odd.sub_even (h : n ≤ m) (hm : Odd m) (hn : Even n) : Odd (m - n) :=
(odd_sub h).mpr <| iff_of_true hm hn
lemma odd_sub' (h : n ≤ m) : Odd (m - n) ↔ (Odd n ↔ Even m) := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, even_sub h, not_iff, not_iff_comm, ← not_even_iff_odd]
lemma Even.sub_odd (h : n ≤ m) (hm : Even m) (hn : Odd n) : Odd (m - n) :=
(odd_sub' h).mpr <| iff_of_true hn hm
lemma two_mul_div_two_add_one_of_odd (h : Odd n) : 2 * (n / 2) + 1 = n := by
rw [← odd_iff.mp h, div_add_mod]
lemma div_two_mul_two_add_one_of_odd (h : Odd n) : n / 2 * 2 + 1 = n := by
rw [← odd_iff.mp h, div_add_mod']
lemma one_add_div_two_mul_two_of_odd (h : Odd n) : 1 + n / 2 * 2 = n := by
rw [← odd_iff.mp h, mod_add_div']
-- Here are examples of how `parity_simps` can be used with `Nat`.
example (m n : ℕ) (h : Even m) : ¬Even (n + 3) ↔ Even (m ^ 2 + m + n) := by
simp [*, two_ne_zero, parity_simps]
example : ¬Even 25394535 := by decide
end Nat
open Nat
namespace Function
namespace Involutive
variable {α : Type*} {f : α → α} {n : ℕ}
section
lemma iterate_bit0 (hf : Involutive f) (n : ℕ) : f^[2 * n] = id := by
rw [iterate_mul, involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id.1 hf, iterate_id]
lemma iterate_bit1 (hf : Involutive f) (n : ℕ) : f^[2 * n + 1] = f := by
rw [← succ_eq_add_one, iterate_succ, hf.iterate_bit0, id_comp]
end
lemma iterate_two_mul (hf : Involutive f) (n : ℕ) : f^[2 * n] = id := by
rw [iterate_mul, involutive_iff_iter_2_eq_id.1 hf, iterate_id]
lemma iterate_even (hf : Involutive f) (hn : Even n) : f^[n] = id := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [← two_mul, hf.iterate_two_mul]
lemma iterate_odd (hf : Involutive f) (hn : Odd n) : f^[n] = f := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [iterate_add, hf.iterate_two_mul, id_comp, iterate_one]
lemma iterate_eq_self (hf : Involutive f) (hne : f ≠ id) : f^[n] = f ↔ Odd n :=
⟨fun H ↦ not_even_iff_odd.1 fun hn ↦ hne <| by rwa [hf.iterate_even hn, eq_comm] at H,
hf.iterate_odd⟩
lemma iterate_eq_id (hf : Involutive f) (hne : f ≠ id) : f^[n] = id ↔ Even n :=
⟨fun H ↦ not_odd_iff_even.1 fun hn ↦ hne <| by rwa [hf.iterate_odd hn] at H, hf.iterate_even⟩
end Involutive
end Function
section DistribNeg
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] [HasDistribNeg R] {m n : ℕ}
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_ite : (-1 : R) ^ n = if Even n then 1 else (-1) := by
cases even_or_odd n with
| inl h => rw [h.neg_one_pow, if_pos h]
| inr h => rw [h.neg_one_pow, if_neg (by simpa using h)]
lemma neg_one_pow_congr (h : Even m ↔ Even n) : (-1 : R) ^ m = (-1) ^ n := by
simp [h, neg_one_pow_eq_ite]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_one_iff_even (h : (-1 : R) ≠ 1) :
(-1 : R) ^ n = 1 ↔ Even n := by simp [neg_one_pow_eq_ite, h]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_neg_one_iff_odd (h : (-1 : R) ≠ 1) :
(-1 : R) ^ n = -1 ↔ Odd n := by simp [neg_one_pow_eq_ite, h.symm]
|
end DistribNeg
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Parity.lean | 359 | 360 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Central
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Catalan numbers
The Catalan numbers (http://oeis.org/A000108) are probably the most ubiquitous sequence of integers
in mathematics. They enumerate several important objects like binary trees, Dyck paths, and
triangulations of convex polygons.
## Main definitions
* `catalan n`: the `n`th Catalan number, defined recursively as
`catalan (n + 1) = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, catalan i * catalan (n - i)`.
## Main results
* `catalan_eq_centralBinom_div`: The explicit formula for the Catalan number using the central
binomial coefficient, `catalan n = Nat.centralBinom n / (n + 1)`.
* `treesOfNumNodesEq_card_eq_catalan`: The number of binary trees with `n` internal nodes
is `catalan n`
## Implementation details
The proof of `catalan_eq_centralBinom_div` follows https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3304415
## TODO
* Prove that the Catalan numbers enumerate many interesting objects.
* Provide the many variants of Catalan numbers, e.g. associated to complex reflection groups,
Fuss-Catalan, etc.
-/
open Finset
open Finset.antidiagonal (fst_le snd_le)
/-- The recursive definition of the sequence of Catalan numbers:
`catalan (n + 1) = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, catalan i * catalan (n - i)` -/
def catalan : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 =>
∑ i : Fin n.succ,
catalan i * catalan (n - i)
@[simp]
theorem catalan_zero : catalan 0 = 1 := by rw [catalan]
theorem catalan_succ (n : ℕ) : catalan (n + 1) = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, catalan i * catalan (n - i) := by
rw [catalan]
theorem catalan_succ' (n : ℕ) :
catalan (n + 1) = ∑ ij ∈ antidiagonal n, catalan ij.1 * catalan ij.2 := by
rw [catalan_succ, Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (fun x y => catalan x * catalan y) n,
sum_range]
@[simp]
theorem catalan_one : catalan 1 = 1 := by simp [catalan_succ]
/-- A helper sequence that can be used to prove the equality of the recursive and the explicit
definition using a telescoping sum argument. -/
private def gosperCatalan (n j : ℕ) : ℚ :=
Nat.centralBinom j * Nat.centralBinom (n - j) * (2 * j - n) / (2 * n * (n + 1))
private theorem gosper_trick {n i : ℕ} (h : i ≤ n) :
gosperCatalan (n + 1) (i + 1) - gosperCatalan (n + 1) i =
Nat.centralBinom i / (i + 1) * Nat.centralBinom (n - i) / (n - i + 1) := by
have l₁ : (i : ℚ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have l₂ : (n : ℚ) - i + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have h₁ := (mul_div_cancel_left₀ (↑(Nat.centralBinom (i + 1))) l₁).symm
have h₂ := (mul_div_cancel_left₀ (↑(Nat.centralBinom (n - i + 1))) l₂).symm
have h₃ : ((i : ℚ) + 1) * (i + 1).centralBinom = 2 * (2 * i + 1) * i.centralBinom :=
mod_cast Nat.succ_mul_centralBinom_succ i
have h₄ :
| ((n : ℚ) - i + 1) * (n - i + 1).centralBinom = 2 * (2 * (n - i) + 1) * (n - i).centralBinom :=
mod_cast Nat.succ_mul_centralBinom_succ (n - i)
simp only [gosperCatalan]
push_cast
rw [show n + 1 - i = n - i + 1 by rw [Nat.add_comm (n - i) 1, ← (Nat.add_sub_assoc h 1),
add_comm]]
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄]
field_simp
ring
private theorem gosper_catalan_sub_eq_central_binom_div (n : ℕ) : gosperCatalan (n + 1) (n + 1) -
gosperCatalan (n + 1) 0 = Nat.centralBinom (n + 1) / (n + 2) := by
have : (n : ℚ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have : (n : ℚ) + 1 + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have h : (n : ℚ) + 2 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
simp only [gosperCatalan, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.centralBinom_zero, Nat.sub_self]
field_simp
ring
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Catalan.lean | 87 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Productive
import Mathlib.Data.WSeq.Relation
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 563 | 564 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry
/-!
# Tensor product of an indexed family of modules over commutative semirings
We define the tensor product of an indexed family `s : ι → Type*` of modules over commutative
semirings. We denote this space by `⨂[R] i, s i` and define it as `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`
quotiented by the appropriate equivalence relation. The treatment follows very closely that of the
binary tensor product in `LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor product
of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `tprod R f` with `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i` over all `i : ι`.
This is bundled as a multilinear map from `Π i, s i` to `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `liftAddHom` constructs an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a
function `φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties.
* `lift φ` with `φ : MultilinearMap R s E` is the corresponding linear map
`(⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E`. This is bundled as a linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.reindex e` re-indexes the components of `⨂[R] i : ι, M` along `e : ι ≃ ι₂`.
* `PiTensorProduct.tmulEquiv` equivalence between a `TensorProduct` of `PiTensorProduct`s and
a single `PiTensorProduct`.
## Notations
* `⨂[R] i, s i` is defined as localized notation in locale `TensorProduct`.
* `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i` with `f : ∀ i, s i` is defined globally as the tensor product of all the `f i`'s.
## Implementation notes
* We define it via `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` with the `R` representing a "hidden" tensor
factor, rather than `FreeAddMonoid (Π i, s i)` to ensure that, if `ι` is an empty type,
the space is isomorphic to the base ring `R`.
* We have not restricted the index type `ι` to be a `Fintype`, as nothing we do here strictly
requires it. However, problems may arise in the case where `ι` is infinite; use at your own
caution.
* Instead of requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `PiTensorProduct` itself, we include it
as an argument in the constructors of the relation. A decidability instance still has to come
from somewhere due to the use of `Function.update`, but this hides it from the downstream user.
See the implementation notes for `MultilinearMap` for an extended discussion of this choice.
## TODO
* Define tensor powers, symmetric subspace, etc.
* API for the various ways `ι` can be split into subsets; connect this with the binary
tensor product.
* Include connection with holors.
* Port more of the API from the binary tensor product over to this case.
## Tags
multilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
open Function
section Semiring
variable {ι ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R₁ R₂ : Type*}
variable {s : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (s i)] [∀ i, Module R (s i)]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommMonoid F]
namespace PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → Prop
| of_zero : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)) 0
| of_zero_scalar : ∀ f : Π i, s i, Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (0, f)) 0
| of_add : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₁) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₂))
(FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
| of_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r', f)) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r + r', f))
| of_smul : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (r' • f i))) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r' * r, f))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor
product of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`. -/
def PiTensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).Quotient
variable {R}
unsuppress_compilation in
/-- This enables the notation `⨂[R] i : ι, s i` for the pi tensor product `PiTensorProduct`,
given an indexed family of types `s : ι → Type*`. -/
scoped[TensorProduct] notation3:100"⨂["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => PiTensorProduct R f) => r
open TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section Module
instance : AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).addMonoid with
add_comm := fun x y ↦
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ ↦
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (⨂[R] i, s i) := ⟨0⟩
variable (R) {s}
/-- `tprodCoeff R r f` with `r : R` and `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i`
over all `i : ι`, multiplied by the coefficient `r`. Note that this is meant as an auxiliary
definition for this file alone, and that one should use `tprod` defined below for most purposes. -/
def tprodCoeff (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) : ⨂[R] i, s i :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)
variable {R}
theorem zero_tprodCoeff (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R 0 f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_scalar _
theorem zero_tprodCoeff' (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (hf : f i = 0) : tprodCoeff R z f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero _ _ i hf
theorem add_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₁) + tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₂) =
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (m₁ + m₂)) :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add _ z f i m₁ m₂)
theorem add_tprodCoeff' (z₁ z₂ : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
tprodCoeff R z₁ f + tprodCoeff R z₂ f = tprodCoeff R (z₁ + z₂) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f)
theorem smul_tprodCoeff_aux [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r * z) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _ _ _
theorem smul_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R₁) [SMul R₁ R]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R R] [SMul R₁ (s i)] [IsScalarTower R₁ R (s i)] :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := by
have h₁ : r • z = r • (1 : R) * z := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
have h₂ : r • f i = (r • (1 : R)) • f i := (smul_one_smul _ _ _).symm
rw [h₁, h₂]
exact smul_tprodCoeff_aux z f i _
/-- Construct an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a function
`φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties. -/
def liftAddHom (φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F)
(C0 : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), φ (r, f) = 0)
(C0' : ∀ f : Π i, s i, φ (0, f) = 0)
(C_add : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
φ (r, update f i m₁) + φ (r, update f i m₂) = φ (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
(C_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i), φ (r, f) + φ (r', f) = φ (r + r', f))
(C_smul : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
φ (r, update f i (r' • f i)) = φ (r' * r, f)) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) →+ F :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift φ) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy ↦
match hxy with
| Eqv.of_zero r' f i hf =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0 r' f i hf]
| Eqv.of_zero_scalar f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0']
| Eqv.of_add inst z f i m₁ m₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_add inst]
| Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C_add_scalar]
| Eqv.of_smul inst z f i r' =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_smul inst]
| Eqv.add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, add_comm]
/-- Induct using `tprodCoeff` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(tprodCoeff : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (tprodCoeff R r f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
have C0 : motive 0 := by
have h₁ := tprodCoeff 0 0
rwa [zero_tprodCoeff] at h₁
refine AddCon.induction_on z fun x ↦ FreeAddMonoid.recOn x C0 ?_
simp_rw [AddCon.coe_add]
refine fun f y ih ↦ add _ _ ?_ ih
convert tprodCoeff f.1 f.2
section DistribMulAction
variable [Monoid R₁] [DistribMulAction R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R]
variable [Monoid R₂] [DistribMulAction R₂ R] [SMulCommClass R₂ R R]
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance hasSMul' : SMul R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun r ↦
liftAddHom (fun f : R × Π i, s i ↦ tprodCoeff R (r • f.1) f.2)
(fun r' f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [zero_tprodCoeff' _ f i hf])
(fun f ↦ by simp [zero_tprodCoeff]) (fun r' f i m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp [add_tprodCoeff])
(fun r' r'' f ↦ by simp [add_tprodCoeff', mul_add]) fun z f i r' ↦ by
simp [smul_tprodCoeff, mul_smul_comm]⟩
instance : SMul R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.hasSMul'
theorem smul_tprodCoeff' (r : R₁) (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
r • tprodCoeff R z f = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := rfl
protected theorem smul_add (r : R₁) (x y : ⨂[R] i, s i) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
instance distribMulAction' : DistribMulAction R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) where
smul := (· • ·)
smul_add _ _ _ := AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
mul_smul r r' x :=
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {r'' f} ↦ by simp [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_smul])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
one_smul x :=
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {r f} ↦ by rw [smul_tprodCoeff', one_smul])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]
smul_zero _ := AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
instance smulCommClass' [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] : SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun {r' r''} x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {xr xf} ↦ by simp only [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_comm])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]⟩
instance isScalarTower' [SMul R₁ R₂] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun {r' r''} x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {xr xf} ↦ by simp only [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_assoc])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]⟩
end DistribMulAction
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance module' [Semiring R₁] [Module R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R] : Module R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ PiTensorProduct.distribMulAction' with
add_smul := fun r r' x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x
(fun {r f} ↦ by simp_rw [smul_tprodCoeff', add_smul, add_tprodCoeff'])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
zero_smul := fun x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x
(fun {r f} ↦ by simp_rw [smul_tprodCoeff', zero_smul, zero_tprodCoeff])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero] }
-- shortcut instances
instance : Module R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.module'
instance : SMulCommClass R R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.smulCommClass'
instance : IsScalarTower R R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.isScalarTower'
variable (R) in
/-- The canonical `MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)`.
`tprod R fun i => f i` has notation `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i`. -/
def tprod : MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i) where
toFun := tprodCoeff R 1
map_update_add' {_ f} i x y := (add_tprodCoeff (1 : R) f i x y).symm
map_update_smul' {_ f} i r x := by
rw [smul_tprodCoeff', ← smul_tprodCoeff (1 : R) _ i, update_idem, update_self]
unsuppress_compilation in
@[inherit_doc tprod]
notation3:100 "⨂ₜ["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => tprod R f) => r
theorem tprod_eq_tprodCoeff_one :
⇑(tprod R : MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)) = tprodCoeff R 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R z f = z • tprod R f := by
have : z = z • (1 : R) := by simp only [mul_one, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
rfl
/-- The image of an element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` in the `PiTensorProduct` is
equal to the sum of `a • ⨂ₜ[R] i, m i` over all the entries `(a, m)` of `p`.
-/
lemma _root_.FreeAddMonoid.toPiTensorProduct (p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :
AddCon.toQuotient (c := addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)) p =
List.sum (List.map (fun x ↦ x.1 • ⨂ₜ[R] i, x.2 i) p.toList) := by
-- TODO: this is defeq abuse: `p` is not a `List`.
match p with
| [] => rw [FreeAddMonoid.toList_nil, List.map_nil, List.sum_nil]; rfl
| x :: ps =>
rw [FreeAddMonoid.toList_cons, List.map_cons, List.sum_cons, ← List.singleton_append,
← toPiTensorProduct ps, ← tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod]
rfl
/-- The set of lifts of an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i` in `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`. -/
def lifts (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) : Set (FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :=
{p | AddCon.toQuotient (c := addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)) p = x}
/-- An element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lifts an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i`
if and only if `x` is equal to the sum of `a • ⨂ₜ[R] i, m i` over all the entries
`(a, m)` of `p`.
-/
lemma mem_lifts_iff (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) (p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :
p ∈ lifts x ↔ List.sum (List.map (fun x ↦ x.1 • ⨂ₜ[R] i, x.2 i) p.toList) = x := by
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq, FreeAddMonoid.toPiTensorProduct]
/-- Every element of `⨂[R] i, s i` has a lift in `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`.
-/
lemma nonempty_lifts (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) : Set.Nonempty (lifts x) := by
existsi @Quotient.out _ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).toSetoid x
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [← AddCon.quot_mk_eq_coe]
erw [Quot.out_eq]
/-- The empty list lifts the element `0` of `⨂[R] i, s i`.
-/
lemma lifts_zero : 0 ∈ lifts (0 : ⨂[R] i, s i) := by
rw [mem_lifts_iff]; erw [List.map_nil]; rw [List.sum_nil]
/-- If elements `p,q` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lift elements `x,y` of `⨂[R] i, s i`
respectively, then `p + q` lifts `x + y`.
-/
lemma lifts_add {x y : ⨂[R] i, s i} {p q : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)}
(hp : p ∈ lifts x) (hq : q ∈ lifts y) : p + q ∈ lifts (x + y) := by
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq, AddCon.coe_add]
rw [hp, hq]
/-- If an element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lifts an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i`,
and if `a` is an element of `R`, then the list obtained by multiplying the first entry of each
element of `p` by `a` lifts `a • x`.
-/
lemma lifts_smul {x : ⨂[R] i, s i} {p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)} (h : p ∈ lifts x) (a : R) :
p.map (fun (y : R × Π i, s i) ↦ (a * y.1, y.2)) ∈ lifts (a • x) := by
rw [mem_lifts_iff] at h ⊢
rw [← h]
simp [Function.comp_def, mul_smul, List.smul_sum]
/-- Induct using scaled versions of `PiTensorProduct.tprod`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(smul_tprod : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (r • tprod R f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
simp_rw [← tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod] at smul_tprod
exact PiTensorProduct.induction_on' z smul_tprod add
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ₁ φ₂ : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E}
(H : φ₁.compMultilinearMap (tprod R) = φ₂.compMultilinearMap (tprod R)) : φ₁ = φ₂ := by
refine LinearMap.ext ?_
refine fun z ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' z ?_ fun {x y} hx hy ↦ by rw [φ₁.map_add, φ₂.map_add, hx, hy]
· intro r f
rw [tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod, φ₁.map_smul, φ₂.map_smul]
apply congr_arg
exact MultilinearMap.congr_fun H f
/-- The pure tensors (i.e. the elements of the image of `PiTensorProduct.tprod`) span
the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tprod_eq_top :
Submodule.span R (Set.range (tprod R)) = (⊤ : Submodule R (⨂[R] i, s i)) :=
Submodule.eq_top_iff'.mpr fun t ↦ t.induction_on
(fun _ _ ↦ Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span (by simp only [Set.mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply])))
(fun _ _ hx hy ↦ Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy)
end Module
section Multilinear
open MultilinearMap
variable {s}
section lift
/-- Auxiliary function to constructing a linear map `(⨂[R] i, s i) → E` given a
`MultilinearMap R s E` with the property that its composition with the canonical
`MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)` is the given multilinear map. -/
def liftAux (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) : (⨂[R] i, s i) →+ E :=
liftAddHom (fun p : R × Π i, s i ↦ p.1 • φ p.2)
(fun z f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [map_coord_zero φ i hf, smul_zero])
(fun f ↦ by simp_rw [zero_smul])
(fun z f i m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp_rw [← smul_add, φ.map_update_add])
(fun z₁ z₂ f ↦ by rw [← add_smul])
fun z f i r ↦ by simp [φ.map_update_smul, smul_smul, mul_comm]
theorem liftAux_tprod (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) (f : Π i, s i) : liftAux φ (tprod R f) = φ f := by
simp only [liftAux, liftAddHom, tprod_eq_tprodCoeff_one, tprodCoeff, AddCon.coe_mk']
-- The end of this proof was very different before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644:
-- rw [FreeAddMonoid.of, FreeAddMonoid.ofList, Equiv.refl_apply, AddCon.lift_coe]
-- dsimp [FreeAddMonoid.lift, FreeAddMonoid.sumAux]
-- show _ • _ = _
-- rw [one_smul]
erw [AddCon.lift_coe]
rw [FreeAddMonoid.of]
dsimp [FreeAddMonoid.ofList]
rw [← one_smul R (φ f)]
erw [Equiv.refl_apply]
convert one_smul R (φ f)
simp
theorem liftAux_tprodCoeff (φ : MultilinearMap R s E) (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
liftAux φ (tprodCoeff R z f) = z • φ f := rfl
theorem liftAux.smul {φ : MultilinearMap R s E} (r : R) (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) :
liftAux φ (r • x) = r • liftAux φ x := by
refine PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x ?_ ?_
· intro z f
rw [smul_tprodCoeff' r z f, liftAux_tprodCoeff, liftAux_tprodCoeff, smul_assoc]
· intro z y ihz ihy
rw [smul_add, (liftAux φ).map_add, ihz, ihy, (liftAux φ).map_add, smul_add]
/-- Constructing a linear map `(⨂[R] i, s i) → E` given a `MultilinearMap R s E` with the
property that its composition with the canonical `MultilinearMap R s E` is
the given multilinear map `φ`. -/
def lift : MultilinearMap R s E ≃ₗ[R] (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E where
toFun φ := { liftAux φ with map_smul' := liftAux.smul }
invFun φ' := φ'.compMultilinearMap (tprod R)
left_inv φ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod, LinearMap.compMultilinearMap]
right_inv φ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod]
map_add' φ₁ φ₂ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod]
map_smul' r φ₂ := by
ext
simp [liftAux_tprod]
variable {φ : MultilinearMap R s E}
@[simp]
theorem lift.tprod (f : Π i, s i) : lift φ (tprod R f) = φ f :=
liftAux_tprod φ f
theorem lift.unique' {φ' : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E}
(H : φ'.compMultilinearMap (PiTensorProduct.tprod R) = φ) : φ' = lift φ :=
ext <| H.symm ▸ (lift.symm_apply_apply φ).symm
theorem lift.unique {φ' : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E} (H : ∀ f, φ' (PiTensorProduct.tprod R f) = φ f) :
φ' = lift φ :=
lift.unique' (MultilinearMap.ext H)
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm (φ' : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E) : lift.symm φ' = φ'.compMultilinearMap (tprod R) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_tprod : lift (tprod R : MultilinearMap R s _) = LinearMap.id :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique' rfl
end lift
section map
variable {t t' : ι → Type*}
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (t i)] [∀ i, Module R (t i)]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (t' i)] [∀ i, Module R (t' i)]
variable (g : Π i, t i →ₗ[R] t' i) (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] t i)
/--
Let `sᵢ` and `tᵢ` be two families of `R`-modules.
Let `f` be a family of `R`-linear maps between `sᵢ` and `tᵢ`, i.e. `f : Πᵢ sᵢ → tᵢ`,
then there is an induced map `⨂ᵢ sᵢ → ⨂ᵢ tᵢ` by `⨂ aᵢ ↦ ⨂ fᵢ aᵢ`.
This is `TensorProduct.map` for an arbitrary family of modules.
-/
def map : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, t i :=
lift <| (tprod R).compLinearMap f
@[simp] lemma map_tprod (x : Π i, s i) :
map f (tprod R x) = tprod R fun i ↦ f i (x i) :=
lift.tprod _
-- No lemmas about associativity, because we don't have associativity of `PiTensorProduct` yet.
theorem map_range_eq_span_tprod :
LinearMap.range (map f) =
Submodule.span R {t | ∃ (m : Π i, s i), tprod R (fun i ↦ f i (m i)) = t} := by
rw [← Submodule.map_top, ← span_tprod_eq_top, Submodule.map_span, ← Set.range_comp]
apply congrArg; ext x
simp only [Set.mem_range, comp_apply, map_tprod, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
/-- Given submodules `p i ⊆ s i`, this is the natural map: `⨂[R] i, p i → ⨂[R] i, s i`.
This is `TensorProduct.mapIncl` for an arbitrary family of modules.
-/
@[simp]
def mapIncl (p : Π i, Submodule R (s i)) : (⨂[R] i, p i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, s i :=
map fun (i : ι) ↦ (p i).subtype
theorem map_comp : map (fun (i : ι) ↦ g i ∘ₗ f i) = map g ∘ₗ map f := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
theorem lift_comp_map (h : MultilinearMap R t E) :
lift h ∘ₗ map f = lift (h.compLinearMap f) := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply,
map_tprod, lift.tprod, MultilinearMap.compLinearMap_apply]
attribute [local ext high] ext
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map (fun i ↦ (LinearMap.id : s i →ₗ[R] s i)) = .id := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, LinearMap.id_coe, id_eq]
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : map (fun (i : ι) ↦ (1 : s i →ₗ[R] s i)) = 1 :=
map_id
protected theorem map_mul (f₁ f₂ : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] s i) :
map (fun i ↦ f₁ i * f₂ i) = map f₁ * map f₂ :=
map_comp f₁ f₂
/-- Upgrading `PiTensorProduct.map` to a `MonoidHom` when `s = t`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMonoidHom : (Π i, s i →ₗ[R] s i) →* ((⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, s i) where
toFun := map
map_one' := PiTensorProduct.map_one
map_mul' := PiTensorProduct.map_mul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_pow (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] s i) (n : ℕ) :
map (f ^ n) = map f ^ n := MonoidHom.map_pow mapMonoidHom _ _
open Function in
private theorem map_add_smul_aux [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (x : Π i, s i) (u : s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
(fun j ↦ update f i u j (x j)) = update (fun j ↦ (f j) (x j)) i (u (x i)) := by
ext j
exact apply_update (fun i F => F (x i)) f i u j
open Function in
protected theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (u v : s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
map (update f i (u + v)) = map (update f i u) + map (update f i v) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, map_add_smul_aux, LinearMap.add_apply,
MultilinearMap.map_update_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := PiTensorProduct.map_update_add
open Function in
protected theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : R) (u : s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
map (update f i (c • u)) = c • map (update f i u) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.compMultilinearMap_apply, map_tprod, map_add_smul_aux, LinearMap.smul_apply,
MultilinearMap.map_update_smul]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul := PiTensorProduct.map_update_smul
variable (R s t)
/-- The tensor of a family of linear maps from `sᵢ` to `tᵢ`, as a multilinear map of
the family.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def mapMultilinear :
MultilinearMap R (fun (i : ι) ↦ s i →ₗ[R] t i) ((⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, t i) where
toFun := map
map_update_smul' _ _ _ _ := PiTensorProduct.map_update_smul _ _ _ _
map_update_add' _ _ _ _ := PiTensorProduct.map_update_add _ _ _ _
variable {R s t}
/--
Let `sᵢ` and `tᵢ` be families of `R`-modules.
Then there is an `R`-linear map between `⨂ᵢ Hom(sᵢ, tᵢ)` and `Hom(⨂ᵢ sᵢ, ⨂ tᵢ)` defined by
`⨂ᵢ fᵢ ↦ ⨂ᵢ aᵢ ↦ ⨂ᵢ fᵢ aᵢ`.
This is `TensorProduct.homTensorHomMap` for an arbitrary family of modules.
Note that `PiTensorProduct.piTensorHomMap (tprod R f)` is equal to `PiTensorProduct.map f`.
-/
def piTensorHomMap : (⨂[R] i, s i →ₗ[R] t i) →ₗ[R] (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, t i :=
lift.toLinearMap ∘ₗ lift (MultilinearMap.piLinearMap <| tprod R)
@[simp] lemma piTensorHomMap_tprod_tprod (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] t i) (x : Π i, s i) :
piTensorHomMap (tprod R f) (tprod R x) = tprod R fun i ↦ f i (x i) := by
simp [piTensorHomMap]
lemma piTensorHomMap_tprod_eq_map (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] t i) :
piTensorHomMap (tprod R f) = map f := by
ext; simp
/-- If `s i` and `t i` are linearly equivalent for every `i` in `ι`, then `⨂[R] i, s i` and
`⨂[R] i, t i` are linearly equivalent.
This is the n-ary version of `TensorProduct.congr`
-/
noncomputable def congr (f : Π i, s i ≃ₗ[R] t i) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) ≃ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, t i :=
.ofLinear
(map (fun i ↦ f i))
(map (fun i ↦ (f i).symm))
(by ext; simp)
(by ext; simp)
@[simp]
theorem congr_tprod (f : Π i, s i ≃ₗ[R] t i) (m : Π i, s i) :
congr f (tprod R m) = tprod R (fun (i : ι) ↦ (f i) (m i)) := by
simp only [congr, LinearEquiv.ofLinear_apply, map_tprod, LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
@[simp]
theorem congr_symm_tprod (f : Π i, s i ≃ₗ[R] t i) (p : Π i, t i) :
(congr f).symm (tprod R p) = tprod R (fun (i : ι) ↦ (f i).symm (p i)) := by
simp only [congr, LinearEquiv.ofLinear_symm_apply, map_tprod, LinearEquiv.coe_coe]
/--
Let `sᵢ`, `tᵢ` and `t'ᵢ` be families of `R`-modules, then `f : Πᵢ sᵢ → tᵢ → t'ᵢ` induces an
element of `Hom(⨂ᵢ sᵢ, Hom(⨂ tᵢ, ⨂ᵢ t'ᵢ))` defined by `⨂ᵢ aᵢ ↦ ⨂ᵢ bᵢ ↦ ⨂ᵢ fᵢ aᵢ bᵢ`.
This is `PiTensorProduct.map` for two arbitrary families of modules.
This is `TensorProduct.map₂` for families of modules.
| -/
def map₂ (f : Π i, s i →ₗ[R] t i →ₗ[R] t' i) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] (⨂[R] i, t i) →ₗ[R] ⨂[R] i, t' i :=
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/PiTensorProduct.lean | 633 | 635 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
/-- Variant of `Ideal.IsPrime.comap` where ideal is explicit rather than implicit. -/
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
H.comap f
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I J : Ideal S) :
(I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
rfl
section Surjective
section
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction (hx := H) (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
end
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
(I : Ideal S) : map e (comap e I) = I :=
I.map_comap_of_surjective e (EquivLike.surjective e)
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
instance (priority := low) (f : R →+* S) [RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) [I.IsTwoSided] :
(I.map f).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left b ha := by
rw [map_eq_submodule_map] at ha ⊢
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := f.surjective b
rw [RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap, ← map_mul]
exact ⟨_, I.mul_mem_right _ ha, rfl⟩
open Function in
theorem IsMaximal.comap_piEvalRingHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
{i : ι} {I : Ideal (R i)} (h : I.IsMaximal) : (I.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i).IsMaximal := by
refine isMaximal_iff.mpr ⟨I.ne_top_iff_one.mp h.ne_top, fun J x le hxI hxJ ↦ ?_⟩
have ⟨r, y, hy, eq⟩ := h.exists_inv hxI
classical
convert J.add_mem (J.mul_mem_left (update 0 i r) hxJ)
(b := update 1 i y) (le <| by apply update_self i y 1 ▸ hy)
ext j
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa [eq_comm] using eq
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I J : Ideal S) :
comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
inj' _ _ eq := SetLike.ext' (Set.preimage_injective.mpr hf <| SetLike.ext'_iff.mp eq)
map_rel_iff' := comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective _ hf ..
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {I : Ideal R}
(H : IsMaximal I) : map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top ↦ ⟨⟨ne_top, fun _J hJ ↦ comap_injective_of_surjective f hf <|
H.1.2 _ (le_comap_map.trans_lt <| (orderEmbeddingOfSurjective f hf).strictMono hJ)⟩⟩
end Surjective
section Injective
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
theorem comap_bot_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm {I : Ideal S} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv (RingEquiv.symm f)
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {y : S} :
f.symm y ∈ I ↔ y ∈ I.map f := by
rw [← comap_symm, mem_comap]
@[simp]
theorem apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {x : R} :
f x ∈ I.map f ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← comap_symm, Ideal.mem_comap, f.symm_apply_apply]
theorem mem_map_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{I : Ideal R} (y : S) : y ∈ map e I ↔ ∃ x ∈ I, e x = y := by
constructor
· intro h
simp_rw [show map e I = _ from map_comap_of_equiv (e : R ≃+* S)] at h
exact ⟨(e : R ≃+* S).symm y, h, (e : R ≃+* S).apply_symm_apply y⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mem_map_of_mem e hx
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f) {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S}
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := map_comap_of_surjective _ hf.2
right_inv J :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ h ↦ have ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf.2).mp h; hf.1 eq ▸ hy)
le_comap_map
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, comap_mono⟩
have := map_mono (f := f) h
simpa only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, map_comap_of_surjective f hf.2] using this
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
lemma comap_map_of_bijective : (I.map f).comap f = I :=
le_antisymm ((comap_le_iff_le_map f hf).mpr fun _ ↦ id) le_comap_map
theorem isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (map f I) ↔ IsMaximal I := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).symm.isCoatom_iff _
theorem isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (comap f K) ↔ IsMaximal K := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).isCoatom_iff _
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.map_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.comap_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective
/-- A ring isomorphism sends a maximal ideal to a maximal ideal. -/
instance map_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (map e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.map_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
/-- The pullback of a maximal ideal under a ring isomorphism is a maximal ideal. -/
instance comap_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal S} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (comap e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.comap_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
theorem isMaximal_iff_of_bijective : (⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h ↦ map_bot (f := f) ▸ h.map_bijective f hf, fun h ↦ have e := RingEquiv.ofBijective f hf
map_bot (f := e.symm) ▸ h.map_bijective _ e.symm.bijective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias map.isMaximal := IsMaximal.map_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias comap.isMaximal := IsMaximal.comap_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff := isMaximal_iff_of_bijective
end Bijective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I : Ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
-- May not hold if `R` is a semiring: consider `ℕ →+* ZMod 2`.
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] :
IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end Surjective
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable (I J : Ideal R) (K L : Ideal S)
protected theorem map_mul {R} [Semiring R] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
(f : F) (I J : Ideal R) :
map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a (semi)ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →+* Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' := Ideal.map_mul f
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_add' I J := Ideal.map_sup f I J
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(Ideal.map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
lemma disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
{p : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} [p.IsPrime] :
Disjoint (I : Set S) (p.primeCompl.map f) ↔ I.comap f ≤ p := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
simp [Set.disjoint_iff, Set.ext_iff, Ideal.primeCompl, not_imp_not, SetLike.le_def]
/-- For a prime ideal `p` of `R`, `p` extended to `S` and
restricted back to `R` is `p` if and only if `p` is the restriction of a prime in `S`. -/
lemma comap_map_eq_self_iff_of_isPrime {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S}
(p : Ideal R) [p.IsPrime] :
(p.map f).comap f = p ↔ (∃ (q : Ideal S), q.IsPrime ∧ q.comap f = p) := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂, hq₃⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_prime_disjoint _ _
(disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mpr hp.le)
exact ⟨q, hq₁, le_antisymm (disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mp hq₃)
(map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hq₂)⟩
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
simp
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
variable (f : F) (g : G)
/-- Kernel of a ring homomorphism as an ideal of the domain. -/
def ker : Ideal R :=
Ideal.comap f ⊥
instance (priority := low) : (ker f).IsTwoSided := inferInstanceAs (Ideal.comap f ⊥).IsTwoSided
variable {f} in
/-- An element is in the kernel if and only if it maps to zero. -/
@[simp] theorem mem_ker {r} : r ∈ ker f ↔ f r = 0 := by rw [ker, Ideal.mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot]
theorem ker_eq : (ker f : Set R) = Set.preimage f {0} :=
rfl
theorem ker_eq_comap_bot (f : F) : ker f = Ideal.comap f ⊥ :=
rfl
theorem comap_ker (f : S →+* R) (g : T →+* S) : (ker f).comap g = ker (f.comp g) := by
rw [RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, Ideal.comap_comap, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot]
/-- If the target is not the zero ring, then one is not in the kernel. -/
theorem not_one_mem_ker [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : (1 : R) ∉ ker f := by
rw [mem_ker, map_one]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem ker_ne_top [Nontrivial S] (f : F) : ker f ≠ ⊤ :=
(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr <| not_one_mem_ker f
lemma _root_.Pi.ker_ringHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
(φ : ∀ i, S →+* R i) : ker (Pi.ringHom φ) = ⨅ i, ker (φ i) := by
ext x
simp [mem_ker, Ideal.mem_iInf, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeSRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeSRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem ker_coe_equiv (f : R ≃+* S) : ker (f : R →+* S) = ⊥ := by
ext; simp
theorem ker_coe_toRingHom : ker (f : R →+* S) = ker f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_equiv {F' : Type*} [EquivLike F' R S] [RingEquivClass F' R S] (f : F') :
ker f = ⊥ := by
ext; simp
lemma ker_equiv_comp (f : R →+* S) (e : S ≃+* T) :
ker (e.toRingHom.comp f) = RingHom.ker f := by
rw [← RingHom.comap_ker, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.ker_coe_equiv, RingHom.ker]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Semiring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem injective_iff_ker_eq_bot : Function.Injective f ↔ ker f = ⊥ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, ker_eq, Set.ext_iff]
exact injective_iff_map_eq_zero' f
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff_eq_zero : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x, f x = 0 → x = 0 := by
rw [← injective_iff_map_eq_zero f, injective_iff_ker_eq_bot]
lemma ker_comp_of_injective [Semiring T] (g : T →+* R) {f : R →+* S} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
ker (f.comp g) = RingHom.ker g := by
rw [← RingHom.comap_ker, (injective_iff_ker_eq_bot f).mp hf, RingHom.ker]
/-- Synonym for `RingHom.ker_coe_equiv`, but given an algebra equivalence. -/
@[simp] theorem _root_.AlgHom.ker_coe_equiv {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
RingHom.ker (e : A →+* B) = ⊥ :=
RingHom.ker_coe_equiv (e.toRingEquiv)
end Ring
section RingRing
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S] [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S] (f : F)
theorem sub_mem_ker_iff {x y} : x - y ∈ ker f ↔ f x = f y := by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ker_rangeRestrict (f : R →+* S) : ker f.rangeRestrict = ker f :=
Ideal.ext fun _ ↦ Subtype.ext_iff
end RingRing
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a domain is a prime ideal. -/
theorem ker_isPrime {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [IsDomain S]
[FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) :
(ker f).IsPrime :=
have := Ideal.bot_prime (α := S)
inferInstanceAs (Ideal.comap f ⊥).IsPrime
/-- The kernel of a homomorphism to a field is a maximal ideal. -/
theorem ker_isMaximal_of_surjective {R K F : Type*} [Ring R] [DivisionRing K]
[FunLike F R K] [RingHomClass F R K] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (ker f).IsMaximal :=
have := Ideal.bot_isMaximal (K := K)
Ideal.comap_isMaximal_of_surjective _ hf
end RingHom
section annihilator
section Semiring
variable {R M M' : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
variable (R M) in
/-- `Module.annihilator R M` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • M = 0`. -/
def Module.annihilator : Ideal R := RingHom.ker (Module.toAddMonoidEnd R M)
theorem Module.mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ Module.annihilator R M ↔ ∀ m : M, r • m = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ (congr($h ·)), (AddMonoidHom.ext ·)⟩
instance (priority := low) : (Module.annihilator R M).IsTwoSided :=
inferInstanceAs (RingHom.ker _).IsTwoSided
theorem LinearMap.annihilator_le_of_injective (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Module.annihilator R M' ≤ Module.annihilator R M := fun x h ↦ by
rw [Module.mem_annihilator] at h ⊢; exact fun m ↦ hf (by rw [map_smul, h, f.map_zero])
theorem LinearMap.annihilator_le_of_surjective (f : M →ₗ[R] M')
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : Module.annihilator R M ≤ Module.annihilator R M' := fun x h ↦ by
rw [Module.mem_annihilator] at h ⊢
intro m; obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := hf m
rw [← map_smul, h, f.map_zero]
theorem LinearEquiv.annihilator_eq (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M') :
Module.annihilator R M = Module.annihilator R M' :=
(e.annihilator_le_of_surjective e.surjective).antisymm (e.annihilator_le_of_injective e.injective)
theorem Module.comap_annihilator {R₀} [CommSemiring R₀] [Module R₀ M]
[Algebra R₀ R] [IsScalarTower R₀ R M] :
(Module.annihilator R M).comap (algebraMap R₀ R) = Module.annihilator R₀ M := by
ext x
simp [mem_annihilator]
lemma Module.annihilator_eq_bot {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
Module.annihilator R M = ⊥ ↔ FaithfulSMul R M := by
rw [← le_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨fun {r s} H' ↦ ?_⟩, fun ⟨H⟩ {a} ha ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
exact H (Module.mem_annihilator (r := r - s).mpr
(by simp only [sub_smul, H', sub_self, implies_true]))
· exact @H a 0 (by simp [Module.mem_annihilator.mp ha])
theorem Module.annihilator_eq_top_iff : annihilator R M = ⊤ ↔ Subsingleton M :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun m m' ↦ by
rw [← one_smul R m, ← one_smul R m']
simp_rw [mem_annihilator.mp (h ▸ Submodule.mem_top)]⟩,
fun _ ↦ top_le_iff.mp fun _ _ ↦ mem_annihilator.mpr fun _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
namespace Submodule
/-- `N.annihilator` is the ideal of all elements `r : R` such that `r • N = 0`. -/
abbrev annihilator (N : Submodule R M) : Ideal R :=
Module.annihilator R N
theorem annihilator_top : (⊤ : Submodule R M).annihilator = Module.annihilator R M :=
topEquiv.annihilator_eq
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
theorem mem_annihilator {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
simp_rw [annihilator, Module.mem_annihilator, Subtype.forall, Subtype.ext_iff]; rfl
theorem annihilator_bot : (⊥ : Submodule R M).annihilator = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp fun _ _ ↦ mem_annihilator.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro rfl; rw [smul_zero]
theorem annihilator_eq_top_iff : N.annihilator = ⊤ ↔ N = ⊥ := by
rw [annihilator, Module.annihilator_eq_top_iff, Submodule.subsingleton_iff_eq_bot]
theorem annihilator_mono (h : N ≤ P) : P.annihilator ≤ N.annihilator := fun _ hrp =>
mem_annihilator.2 fun n hn => mem_annihilator.1 hrp n <| h hn
theorem annihilator_iSup (ι : Sort w) (f : ι → Submodule R M) :
annihilator (⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, annihilator (f i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => annihilator_mono <| le_iSup _ _) fun r H =>
mem_annihilator.2 fun n hn ↦ iSup_induction f (motive := (r • · = 0)) hn
(fun i ↦ mem_annihilator.1 <| (mem_iInf _).mp H i) (smul_zero _)
fun m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ ↦ by simp_rw [smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_zero]
theorem le_annihilator_iff {N : Submodule R M} {I : Ideal R} : I ≤ annihilator N ↔ I • N = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← le_bot_iff, smul_le, SetLike.le_def, mem_annihilator]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem annihilator_smul (N : Submodule R M) : annihilator N • N = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 (smul_le.2 fun _ => mem_annihilator.1)
@[simp]
theorem annihilator_mul (I : Ideal R) : annihilator I * I = ⊥ :=
annihilator_smul I
end Submodule
end Semiring
namespace Submodule
variable {R M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {N : Submodule R M}
theorem mem_annihilator' {r} : r ∈ N.annihilator ↔ N ≤ comap (r • (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M)) ⊥ :=
mem_annihilator.trans ⟨fun H n hn => (mem_bot R).2 <| H n hn, fun H _ hn => (mem_bot R).1 <| H hn⟩
theorem mem_annihilator_span (s : Set M) (r : R) :
r ∈ (Submodule.span R s).annihilator ↔ ∀ n : s, r • (n : M) = 0 := by
rw [Submodule.mem_annihilator]
constructor
· intro h n
exact h _ (Submodule.subset_span n.prop)
· intro h n hn
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hn
· intro x hx
exact h ⟨x, hx⟩
· exact smul_zero _
· intro x y _ _ hx hy
rw [smul_add, hx, hy, zero_add]
· intro a x _ hx
rw [smul_comm, hx, smul_zero]
theorem mem_annihilator_span_singleton (g : M) (r : R) :
r ∈ (Submodule.span R ({g} : Set M)).annihilator ↔ r • g = 0 := by simp [mem_annihilator_span]
open LinearMap in
theorem annihilator_span (s : Set M) :
(Submodule.span R s).annihilator = ⨅ g : s, ker (toSpanSingleton R M g.1) := by
ext; simp [mem_annihilator_span]
open LinearMap in
theorem annihilator_span_singleton (g : M) :
(Submodule.span R {g}).annihilator = ker (toSpanSingleton R M g) := by
simp [annihilator_span]
| @[simp]
theorem mul_annihilator (I : Ideal R) : I * annihilator I = ⊥ := by rw [mul_comm, annihilator_mul]
end Submodule
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 891 | 895 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
/-!
# Discrete quotients of a topological space.
This file defines the type of discrete quotients of a topological space,
denoted `DiscreteQuotient X`. To avoid quantifying over types, we model such
quotients as setoids whose equivalence classes are clopen.
## Definitions
1. `DiscreteQuotient X` is the type of discrete quotients of `X`.
It is endowed with a coercion to `Type`, which is defined as the
quotient associated to the setoid in question, and each such quotient
is endowed with the discrete topology.
2. Given `S : DiscreteQuotient X`, the projection `X → S` is denoted
`S.proj`.
3. When `X` is compact and `S : DiscreteQuotient X`, the space `S` is
endowed with a `Fintype` instance.
## Order structure
The type `DiscreteQuotient X` is endowed with an instance of a `SemilatticeInf` with `OrderTop`.
The partial ordering `A ≤ B` mathematically means that `B.proj` factors through `A.proj`.
The top element `⊤` is the trivial quotient, meaning that every element of `X` is collapsed
to a point. Given `h : A ≤ B`, the map `A → B` is `DiscreteQuotient.ofLE h`.
Whenever `X` is a locally connected space, the type `DiscreteQuotient X` is also endowed with an
instance of an `OrderBot`, where the bot element `⊥` is given by the `connectedComponentSetoid`,
i.e., `x ~ y` means that `x` and `y` belong to the same connected component. In particular, if `X`
is a discrete topological space, then `x ~ y` is equivalent (propositionally, not definitionally) to
`x = y`.
Given `f : C(X, Y)`, we define a predicate `DiscreteQuotient.LEComap f A B` for
`A : DiscreteQuotient X` and `B : DiscreteQuotient Y`, asserting that `f` descends to `A → B`. If
`cond : DiscreteQuotient.LEComap h A B`, the function `A → B` is obtained by
`DiscreteQuotient.map f cond`.
## Theorems
The two main results proved in this file are:
1. `DiscreteQuotient.eq_of_forall_proj_eq` which states that when `X` is compact, T₂, and totally
disconnected, any two elements of `X` are equal if their projections in `Q` agree for all
`Q : DiscreteQuotient X`.
2. `DiscreteQuotient.exists_of_compat` which states that when `X` is compact, then any
system of elements of `Q` as `Q : DiscreteQuotient X` varies, which is compatible with
respect to `DiscreteQuotient.ofLE`, must arise from some element of `X`.
## Remarks
The constructions in this file will be used to show that any profinite space is a limit
of finite discrete spaces.
-/
open Set Function TopologicalSpace Topology
variable {α X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
/-- The type of discrete quotients of a topological space. -/
@[ext]
structure DiscreteQuotient (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] extends Setoid X where
/-- For every point `x`, the set `{ y | Rel x y }` is an open set. -/
protected isOpen_setOf_rel : ∀ x, IsOpen (setOf (toSetoid x))
namespace DiscreteQuotient
variable (S : DiscreteQuotient X)
lemma toSetoid_injective : Function.Injective (@toSetoid X _)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, _ => by congr
/-- Construct a discrete quotient from a clopen set. -/
def ofIsClopen {A : Set X} (h : IsClopen A) : DiscreteQuotient X where
toSetoid := ⟨fun x y => x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A, fun _ => Iff.rfl, Iff.symm, Iff.trans⟩
isOpen_setOf_rel x := by by_cases hx : x ∈ A <;> simp [hx, h.1, h.2, ← compl_setOf]
theorem refl : ∀ x, S.toSetoid x x := S.refl'
theorem symm (x y : X) : S.toSetoid x y → S.toSetoid y x := S.symm'
theorem trans (x y z : X) : S.toSetoid x y → S.toSetoid y z → S.toSetoid x z := S.trans'
/-- The setoid whose quotient yields the discrete quotient. -/
add_decl_doc toSetoid
instance : CoeSort (DiscreteQuotient X) (Type _) :=
⟨fun S => Quotient S.toSetoid⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace S :=
inferInstanceAs (TopologicalSpace (Quotient S.toSetoid))
/-- The projection from `X` to the given discrete quotient. -/
def proj : X → S := Quotient.mk''
theorem fiber_eq (x : X) : S.proj ⁻¹' {S.proj x} = setOf (S.toSetoid x) :=
Set.ext fun _ => eq_comm.trans Quotient.eq''
theorem proj_surjective : Function.Surjective S.proj :=
Quotient.mk''_surjective
theorem proj_isQuotientMap : IsQuotientMap S.proj :=
isQuotientMap_quot_mk
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-22")]
alias proj_quotientMap := proj_isQuotientMap
theorem proj_continuous : Continuous S.proj :=
S.proj_isQuotientMap.continuous
instance : DiscreteTopology S :=
singletons_open_iff_discrete.1 <| S.proj_surjective.forall.2 fun x => by
rw [← S.proj_isQuotientMap.isOpen_preimage, fiber_eq]
exact S.isOpen_setOf_rel _
theorem proj_isLocallyConstant : IsLocallyConstant S.proj :=
(IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous S.proj).2 S.proj_continuous
theorem isClopen_preimage (A : Set S) : IsClopen (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(isClopen_discrete A).preimage S.proj_continuous
theorem isOpen_preimage (A : Set S) : IsOpen (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(S.isClopen_preimage A).2
theorem isClosed_preimage (A : Set S) : IsClosed (S.proj ⁻¹' A) :=
(S.isClopen_preimage A).1
theorem isClopen_setOf_rel (x : X) : IsClopen (setOf (S.toSetoid x)) := by
rw [← fiber_eq]
apply isClopen_preimage
instance : Min (DiscreteQuotient X) :=
⟨fun S₁ S₂ => ⟨S₁.1 ⊓ S₂.1, fun x => (S₁.2 x).inter (S₂.2 x)⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeInf (DiscreteQuotient X) :=
Injective.semilatticeInf toSetoid toSetoid_injective fun _ _ => rfl
instance : OrderTop (DiscreteQuotient X) where
top := ⟨⊤, fun _ => isOpen_univ⟩
le_top a := by tauto
instance : Inhabited (DiscreteQuotient X) := ⟨⊤⟩
instance inhabitedQuotient [Inhabited X] : Inhabited S := ⟨S.proj default⟩
-- TODO: add instances about `Nonempty (Quot _)`/`Nonempty (Quotient _)`
instance [Nonempty X] : Nonempty S := Nonempty.map S.proj ‹_›
/-- The quotient by `⊤ : DiscreteQuotient X` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance : Subsingleton (⊤ : DiscreteQuotient X) where
allEq := by rintro ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩; exact Quotient.sound trivial
section Comap
variable (g : C(Y, Z)) (f : C(X, Y))
/-- Comap a discrete quotient along a continuous map. -/
def comap (S : DiscreteQuotient Y) : DiscreteQuotient X where
toSetoid := Setoid.comap f S.1
isOpen_setOf_rel _ := (S.2 _).preimage f.continuous
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : S.comap (ContinuousMap.id X) = S := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp (S : DiscreteQuotient Z) : S.comap (g.comp f) = (S.comap g).comap f :=
rfl
@[mono]
theorem comap_mono {A B : DiscreteQuotient Y} (h : A ≤ B) : A.comap f ≤ B.comap f := by tauto
end Comap
section OfLE
variable {A B C : DiscreteQuotient X}
/-- The map induced by a refinement of a discrete quotient. -/
def ofLE (h : A ≤ B) : A → B :=
Quotient.map' id h
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_refl : ofLE (le_refl A) = id := by
ext ⟨⟩
rfl
theorem ofLE_refl_apply (a : A) : ofLE (le_refl A) a = a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_ofLE (h₁ : A ≤ B) (h₂ : B ≤ C) (x : A) :
ofLE h₂ (ofLE h₁ x) = ofLE (h₁.trans h₂) x := by
rcases x with ⟨⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_comp_ofLE (h₁ : A ≤ B) (h₂ : B ≤ C) : ofLE h₂ ∘ ofLE h₁ = ofLE (le_trans h₁ h₂) :=
funext <| ofLE_ofLE _ _
theorem ofLE_continuous (h : A ≤ B) : Continuous (ofLE h) :=
continuous_of_discreteTopology
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_proj (h : A ≤ B) (x : X) : ofLE h (A.proj x) = B.proj x :=
Quotient.sound' (B.refl _)
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_comp_proj (h : A ≤ B) : ofLE h ∘ A.proj = B.proj :=
funext <| ofLE_proj _
end OfLE
/-- When `X` is a locally connected space, there is an `OrderBot` instance on
`DiscreteQuotient X`. The bottom element is given by `connectedComponentSetoid X`
-/
instance [LocallyConnectedSpace X] : OrderBot (DiscreteQuotient X) where
bot :=
{ toSetoid := connectedComponentSetoid X
isOpen_setOf_rel := fun x => by
convert isOpen_connectedComponent (x := x)
ext y
simpa only [connectedComponentSetoid, ← connectedComponent_eq_iff_mem] using eq_comm }
bot_le S := fun x y (h : connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y) =>
(S.isClopen_setOf_rel x).connectedComponent_subset (S.refl _) <| h.symm ▸ mem_connectedComponent
@[simp]
theorem proj_bot_eq [LocallyConnectedSpace X] {x y : X} :
proj ⊥ x = proj ⊥ y ↔ connectedComponent x = connectedComponent y :=
Quotient.eq''
theorem proj_bot_inj [DiscreteTopology X] {x y : X} : proj ⊥ x = proj ⊥ y ↔ x = y := by simp
theorem proj_bot_injective [DiscreteTopology X] : Injective (⊥ : DiscreteQuotient X).proj :=
fun _ _ => proj_bot_inj.1
theorem proj_bot_bijective [DiscreteTopology X] : Bijective (⊥ : DiscreteQuotient X).proj :=
⟨proj_bot_injective, proj_surjective _⟩
section Map
variable (f : C(X, Y)) (A A' : DiscreteQuotient X) (B B' : DiscreteQuotient Y)
/-- Given `f : C(X, Y)`, `DiscreteQuotient.LEComap f A B` is defined as
`A ≤ B.comap f`. Mathematically this means that `f` descends to a morphism `A → B`. -/
def LEComap : Prop :=
A ≤ B.comap f
theorem leComap_id : LEComap (.id X) A A := le_rfl
variable {A A' B B'} {f} {g : C(Y, Z)} {C : DiscreteQuotient Z}
@[simp]
theorem leComap_id_iff : LEComap (ContinuousMap.id X) A A' ↔ A ≤ A' :=
Iff.rfl
theorem LEComap.comp : LEComap g B C → LEComap f A B → LEComap (g.comp f) A C := by tauto
@[mono]
theorem LEComap.mono (h : LEComap f A B) (hA : A' ≤ A) (hB : B ≤ B') : LEComap f A' B' :=
hA.trans <| h.trans <| comap_mono _ hB
/-- Map a discrete quotient along a continuous map. -/
def map (f : C(X, Y)) (cond : LEComap f A B) : A → B := Quotient.map' f cond
theorem map_continuous (cond : LEComap f A B) : Continuous (map f cond) :=
continuous_of_discreteTopology
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_proj (cond : LEComap f A B) : map f cond ∘ A.proj = B.proj ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_proj (cond : LEComap f A B) (x : X) : map f cond (A.proj x) = B.proj (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map _ (leComap_id A) = id := by ext ⟨⟩; rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: figure out why `simpNF` says this is a bad `@[simp]` lemma
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/365
theorem map_comp (h1 : LEComap g B C) (h2 : LEComap f A B) :
map (g.comp f) (h1.comp h2) = map g h1 ∘ map f h2 := by
ext ⟨⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_map (cond : LEComap f A B) (h : B ≤ B') (a : A) :
ofLE h (map f cond a) = map f (cond.mono le_rfl h) a := by
rcases a with ⟨⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_comp_map (cond : LEComap f A B) (h : B ≤ B') :
ofLE h ∘ map f cond = map f (cond.mono le_rfl h) :=
funext <| ofLE_map cond h
@[simp]
theorem map_ofLE (cond : LEComap f A B) (h : A' ≤ A) (c : A') :
map f cond (ofLE h c) = map f (cond.mono h le_rfl) c := by
rcases c with ⟨⟩
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_ofLE (cond : LEComap f A B) (h : A' ≤ A) :
map f cond ∘ ofLE h = map f (cond.mono h le_rfl) :=
funext <| map_ofLE cond h
end Map
theorem eq_of_forall_proj_eq [T2Space X] [CompactSpace X] [disc : TotallyDisconnectedSpace X]
{x y : X} (h : ∀ Q : DiscreteQuotient X, Q.proj x = Q.proj y) : x = y := by
rw [← mem_singleton_iff, ← connectedComponent_eq_singleton, connectedComponent_eq_iInter_isClopen,
mem_iInter]
rintro ⟨U, hU1, hU2⟩
exact (Quotient.exact' (h (ofIsClopen hU1))).mpr hU2
theorem fiber_subset_ofLE {A B : DiscreteQuotient X} (h : A ≤ B) (a : A) :
A.proj ⁻¹' {a} ⊆ B.proj ⁻¹' {ofLE h a} := by
rcases A.proj_surjective a with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [fiber_eq, ofLE_proj, fiber_eq]
exact fun _ h' => h h'
theorem exists_of_compat [CompactSpace X] (Qs : (Q : DiscreteQuotient X) → Q)
(compat : ∀ (A B : DiscreteQuotient X) (h : A ≤ B), ofLE h (Qs _) = Qs _) :
∃ x : X, ∀ Q : DiscreteQuotient X, Q.proj x = Qs _ := by
have H₁ : ∀ Q₁ Q₂, Q₁ ≤ Q₂ → proj Q₁ ⁻¹' {Qs Q₁} ⊆ proj Q₂ ⁻¹' {Qs Q₂} := fun _ _ h => by
| rw [← compat _ _ h]
exact fiber_subset_ofLE _ _
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : Set.Nonempty (⋂ Q, proj Q ⁻¹' {Qs Q}) :=
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
| Mathlib/Topology/DiscreteQuotient.lean | 335 | 338 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
| simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 87 | 89 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-! # Formal power series (in one variable) - Order
The `PowerSeries.order` of a formal power series `φ` is the multiplicity of the variable `X` in `φ`.
If the coefficients form an integral domain, then `PowerSeries.order` is an
additive valuation (`PowerSeries.order_mul`, `PowerSeries.min_order_le_order_add`).
We prove that if the commutative ring `R` of coefficients is an integral domain,
then the ring `R⟦X⟧` of formal power series in one variable over `R`
is an integral domain.
Given a non-zero power series `f`, `divided_by_X_pow_order f` is the power series obtained by
dividing out the largest power of X that divides `f`, that is its order. This is useful when
proving that `R⟦X⟧` is a normalization monoid, which is done in `PowerSeries.Inverse`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section OrderBasic
variable [Semiring R] {φ : R⟦X⟧}
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero : (∃ n : ℕ, coeff R n φ ≠ 0) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
refine not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
simp [(coeff R _).map_zero]
/-- The order of a formal power series `φ` is the greatest `n : PartENat`
such that `X^n` divides `φ`. The order is `⊤` if and only if `φ = 0`. -/
def order (φ : R⟦X⟧) : ℕ∞ :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
letI := Classical.decEq R⟦X⟧
if h : φ = 0 then ⊤ else Nat.find (exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mpr h)
/-- The order of the `0` power series is infinite. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_zero : order (0 : R⟦X⟧) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem order_finite_iff_ne_zero : (order φ < ⊤) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
simp only [order]
split_ifs with h <;> simpa
/-- The `0` power series is the unique power series with infinite order. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_eq_top {φ : R⟦X⟧} : φ.order = ⊤ ↔ φ = 0 := by
simpa using order_finite_iff_ne_zero.not_left
theorem coe_toNat_order {φ : R⟦X⟧} (hf : φ ≠ 0) : φ.order.toNat = φ.order := by
rw [ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self.mpr (order_eq_top.not.mpr hf)]
/-- If the order of a formal power series is finite,
then the coefficient indexed by the order is nonzero. -/
theorem coeff_order (h : φ ≠ 0) : coeff R φ.order.toNat φ ≠ 0 := by
classical
simp only [order, h, not_false_iff, dif_neg]
generalize_proofs h
exact Nat.find_spec h
/-- If the `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is nonzero,
then the order of the power series is less than or equal to `n`. -/
theorem order_le (n : ℕ) (h : coeff R n φ ≠ 0) : order φ ≤ n := by
classical
rw [order, dif_neg]
· simpa using ⟨n, le_rfl, h⟩
· exact exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mp ⟨n, h⟩
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is `0` if `n` is strictly
smaller than the order of the power series. -/
theorem coeff_of_lt_order (n : ℕ) (h : ↑n < order φ) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact order_le _ h
theorem coeff_of_lt_order_toNat (n : ℕ) (h : n < φ.order.toNat) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
by_cases h' : φ = 0
· simp [h']
· refine coeff_of_lt_order _ ?_
rwa [← coe_toNat_order h', ENat.coe_lt_coe]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem nat_le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ i < n, coeff R i φ = 0) : ↑n ≤ order φ := by
classical
simp only [order]
split_ifs
· simp
· simpa [Nat.le_find_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ∞) (h : ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :
n ≤ order φ := by
cases n with
| top => simpa using ext (by simpa using h)
| coe n =>
convert nat_le_order φ n _
simpa using h
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem order_eq_nat {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} :
order φ = n ↔ coeff R n φ ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ i, i < n → coeff R i φ = 0 := by
classical
rcases eq_or_ne φ 0 with (rfl | hφ)
· simp
simp [order, dif_neg hφ, Nat.find_eq_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem order_eq {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ∞} :
order φ = n ↔ (∀ i : ℕ, ↑i = n → coeff R i φ ≠ 0) ∧ ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0 := by
cases n with
| top => simp [ext_iff]
| coe n => simp [order_eq_nat]
/-- The order of the sum of two formal power series
is at least the minimum of their orders. -/
theorem min_order_le_order_add (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : min (order φ) (order ψ) ≤ order (φ + ψ) := by
refine le_order _ _ ?_
simp +contextual [coeff_of_lt_order]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-12")] alias le_order_add := min_order_le_order_add
private theorem order_add_of_order_eq.aux (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧)
(H : order φ < order ψ) : order (φ + ψ) ≤ order φ ⊓ order ψ := by
suffices order (φ + ψ) = order φ by
rw [le_inf_iff, this]
exact ⟨le_rfl, le_of_lt H⟩
rw [order_eq]
constructor
· intro i hi
rw [← hi] at H
rw [(coeff _ _).map_add, coeff_of_lt_order i H, add_zero]
exact (order_eq_nat.1 hi.symm).1
· intro i hi
rw [(coeff _ _).map_add, coeff_of_lt_order i hi, coeff_of_lt_order i (lt_trans hi H),
zero_add]
/-- The order of the sum of two formal power series
is the minimum of their orders if their orders differ. -/
theorem order_add_of_order_eq (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) (h : order φ ≠ order ψ) :
order (φ + ψ) = order φ ⊓ order ψ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (min_order_le_order_add _ _)
rcases h.lt_or_lt with (φ_lt_ψ | ψ_lt_φ)
· apply order_add_of_order_eq.aux _ _ φ_lt_ψ
· simpa only [add_comm, inf_comm] using order_add_of_order_eq.aux _ _ ψ_lt_φ
/-- The order of the product of two formal power series
is at least the sum of their orders. -/
theorem le_order_mul (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : order φ + order ψ ≤ order (φ * ψ) := by
apply le_order
intro n hn; rw [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
by_cases hi : ↑i < order φ
· rw [coeff_of_lt_order i hi, zero_mul]
by_cases hj : ↑j < order ψ
· rw [coeff_of_lt_order j hj, mul_zero]
rw [not_lt] at hi hj; rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hij
exfalso
apply ne_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le hn <| add_le_add hi hj)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, hij]
theorem le_order_pow (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) : n • order φ ≤ order (φ ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
simp only [add_smul, one_smul, pow_succ]
apply le_trans _ (le_order_mul _ _)
exact add_le_add_right hn φ.order
alias order_mul_ge := le_order_mul
/-- The order of the monomial `a*X^n` is infinite if `a = 0` and `n` otherwise. -/
theorem order_monomial (n : ℕ) (a : R) [Decidable (a = 0)] :
order (monomial R n a) = if a = 0 then (⊤ : ℕ∞) else n := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, order_eq_top, LinearMap.map_zero]
· rw [order_eq]
constructor <;> intro i hi
· simp only [Nat.cast_inj] at hi
rwa [hi, coeff_monomial_same]
· simp only [Nat.cast_lt] at hi
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
exact ne_of_lt hi
/-- The order of the monomial `a*X^n` is `n` if `a ≠ 0`. -/
theorem order_monomial_of_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) : order (monomial R n a) = n := by
classical
rw [order_monomial, if_neg h]
/-- If `n` is strictly smaller than the order of `ψ`, then the `n`th coefficient of its product
with any other power series is `0`. -/
theorem coeff_mul_of_lt_order {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n < ψ.order) :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = 0 := by
suffices coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, 0 by rw [this, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [coeff_mul]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro x hx
refine mul_eq_zero_of_right (coeff R x.fst φ) (coeff_of_lt_order x.snd (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ h))
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at hx
norm_cast
omega
theorem coeff_mul_one_sub_of_lt_order {R : Type*} [Ring R] {φ ψ : R⟦X⟧} (n : ℕ)
(h : ↑n < ψ.order) : coeff R n (φ * (1 - ψ)) = coeff R n φ := by
simp [coeff_mul_of_lt_order h, mul_sub]
theorem coeff_mul_prod_one_sub_of_lt_order {R ι : Type*} [CommRing R] (k : ℕ) (s : Finset ι)
(φ : R⟦X⟧) (f : ι → R⟦X⟧) :
(∀ i ∈ s, ↑k < (f i).order) → coeff R k (φ * ∏ i ∈ s, (1 - f i)) = coeff R k φ := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s ha ih t
· simp
· intro t
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp] at t
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm, coeff_mul_one_sub_of_lt_order _ t.1]
exact ih t.2
/-- Given a non-zero power series `f`, `divXPowOrder f` is the power series obtained by
dividing out the largest power of X that divides `f`, that is its order -/
def divXPowOrder (f : R⟦X⟧) : R⟦X⟧ :=
.mk fun n ↦ coeff R (n + f.order.toNat) f
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-15")]
noncomputable alias divided_by_X_pow_order := divXPowOrder
@[simp]
lemma coeff_divXPowOrder {f : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} :
coeff R n (divXPowOrder f) = coeff R (n + f.order.toNat) f :=
coeff_mk _ _
@[simp]
lemma divXPowOrder_zero :
divXPowOrder (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
ext
simp
lemma constantCoeff_divXPowOrder {f : R⟦X⟧} :
constantCoeff R (divXPowOrder f) = coeff R f.order.toNat f := by
simp [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff]
lemma constantCoeff_divXPowOrder_eq_zero_iff {f : R⟦X⟧} :
constantCoeff R (divXPowOrder f) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
by_cases h : f = 0
· simp [h]
· simp [constantCoeff_divXPowOrder, coeff_order h, h]
theorem X_pow_order_mul_divXPowOrder {f : R⟦X⟧} :
X ^ f.order.toNat * divXPowOrder f = f := by
ext n
rw [coeff_X_pow_mul']
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· push_neg at h
rw [coeff_of_lt_order_toNat _ h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-15")]
alias self_eq_X_pow_order_mul_divided_by_X_pow_order := X_pow_order_mul_divXPowOrder
theorem X_pow_order_dvd : X ^ φ.order.toNat ∣ φ := by
simpa only [X_pow_dvd_iff] using coeff_of_lt_order_toNat
theorem order_eq_emultiplicity_X {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
order φ = emultiplicity X φ := by
classical
rcases eq_or_ne φ 0 with (rfl | hφ)
· simp
cases ho : order φ with
| top => simp [hφ] at ho
| coe n =>
have hn : φ.order.toNat = n := by simp [ho]
rw [← hn, eq_comm]
apply le_antisymm _
· apply le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd
apply X_pow_order_dvd
· apply Order.le_of_lt_add_one
rw [← not_le, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity]
rintro ⟨ψ, H⟩
have := congr_arg (coeff R n) H
rw [X_pow_mul, coeff_mul_of_lt_order, ← hn] at this
· exact coeff_order hφ this
· rw [X_pow_eq, order_monomial]
split_ifs
· simp
· rw [← hn, ENat.coe_lt_coe]
simp
end OrderBasic
section OrderZeroNeOne
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R]
/-- The order of the formal power series `1` is `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_one : order (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
simpa using order_monomial_of_ne_zero 0 (1 : R) one_ne_zero
|
/-- The order of an invertible power series is `0`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Order.lean | 319 | 320 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis,
Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Map
/-!
# Kernel of a linear map
This file defines the kernel of a linear map.
## Main definitions
* `LinearMap.ker`: the kernel of a linear map as a submodule of the domain
## Notations
* We continue to use the notations `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` and `M →ₗ[R] M₂` for the type of semilinear
(resp. linear) maps from `M` to `M₂` over the ring homomorphism `σ` (resp. over the ring `R`).
## Tags
linear algebra, vector space, module
-/
open Function
open Pointwise
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
/-! ### Properties of linear maps -/
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
/-- The kernel of a linear map `f : M → M₂` is defined to be `comap f ⊥`. This is equivalent to the
set of `x : M` such that `f x = 0`. The kernel is a submodule of `M`. -/
def ker (f : F) : Submodule R M :=
comap f ⊥
@[simp]
theorem mem_ker {f : F} {y} : y ∈ ker f ↔ f y = 0 :=
mem_bot R₂
@[simp]
theorem ker_id : ker (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_ker (f : F) (x : ker f) : f x = 0 :=
mem_ker.1 x.2
theorem ker_toAddSubmonoid (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : (ker f).toAddSubmonoid = (AddMonoidHom.mker f) :=
rfl
theorem le_ker_iff_comp_subtype_eq_zero {N : Submodule R M} {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} :
N ≤ ker f ↔ f ∘ₛₗ N.subtype = 0 := by
rw [SetLike.le_def, LinearMap.ext_iff, Subtype.forall]; rfl
theorem comp_ker_subtype (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : f.comp (ker f).subtype = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => mem_ker.1 x.2
theorem ker_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) :
ker (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = comap f (ker g) :=
rfl
theorem ker_le_ker_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) :
ker f ≤ ker (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) := by rw [ker_comp]; exact comap_mono bot_le
theorem ker_sup_ker_le_ker_comp_of_commute {f g : M →ₗ[R] M} (h : Commute f g) :
ker f ⊔ ker g ≤ ker (f ∘ₗ g) := by
refine sup_le_iff.mpr ⟨?_, ker_le_ker_comp g f⟩
rw [← Module.End.mul_eq_comp, h.eq, Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
exact ker_le_ker_comp f g
@[simp]
theorem ker_le_comap {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
ker f ≤ p.comap f :=
fun x hx ↦ by simp [mem_ker.mp hx]
theorem disjoint_ker {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} :
Disjoint p (ker f) ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, f x = 0 → x = 0 := by
simp [disjoint_def]
theorem ker_eq_bot' {f : F} : ker f = ⊥ ↔ ∀ m, f m = 0 → m = 0 := by
simpa [disjoint_iff_inf_le] using disjoint_ker (f := f) (p := ⊤)
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_inverse {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomInvPair τ₁₂ τ₂₁] {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂}
{g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M} (h : (g.comp f : M →ₗ[R] M) = id) : ker f = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot'.2 fun m hm => by rw [← id_apply (R := R) m, ← h, comp_apply, hm, g.map_zero]
theorem le_ker_iff_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} :
p ≤ ker f ↔ map f p = ⊥ := by rw [ker, eq_bot_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap]
theorem ker_codRestrict {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} (p : Submodule R M) (f : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) (hf) :
ker (codRestrict p f hf) = ker f := by rw [ker, comap_codRestrict, Submodule.map_bot]; rfl
lemma ker_domRestrict [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] (p : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M₁) :
ker (domRestrict f p) = (ker f).comap p.subtype := ker_comp ..
theorem ker_restrict [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] {p : Submodule R M} {q : Submodule R M₁}
{f : M →ₗ[R] M₁} (hf : ∀ x : M, x ∈ p → f x ∈ q) :
ker (f.restrict hf) = (ker f).comap p.subtype := by
rw [restrict_eq_codRestrict_domRestrict, ker_codRestrict, ker_domRestrict]
@[simp]
theorem ker_zero : ker (0 : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff'.2 fun x => by simp
@[simp]
theorem ker_eq_top {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} : ker f = ⊤ ↔ f = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ext fun _ => mem_ker.1 <| h.symm ▸ trivial, fun h => h.symm ▸ ker_zero⟩
theorem exists_ne_zero_of_sSup_eq_top {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} (h : f ≠ 0) (s : Set (Submodule R M))
(hs : sSup s = ⊤): ∃ m ∈ s, f ∘ₛₗ m.subtype ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h
simp_rw [← ker_eq_top, eq_top_iff, ← hs, sSup_le_iff, le_ker_iff_comp_subtype_eq_zero]
exact h
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_ker {M M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂]
(f : M →+ M₂) : LinearMap.ker f.toIntLinearMap = AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule f.ker := rfl
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_injective {f : F} (hf : Injective f) : ker f = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
simpa only [mem_ker, mem_bot, ← map_zero f, hf.eq_iff] using hx
/-- The increasing sequence of submodules consisting of the kernels of the iterates of a linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def iterateKer (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ℕ →o Submodule R M where
toFun n := ker (f ^ n)
monotone' n m w x h := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le w
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker] at h
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker, add_comm, pow_add, Module.End.mul_apply, h, LinearMap.map_zero]
end AddCommMonoid
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring R₂]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
variable {f : F}
open Submodule
theorem ker_toAddSubgroup (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : (ker f).toAddSubgroup = f.toAddMonoidHom.ker :=
rfl
theorem sub_mem_ker_iff {x y} : x - y ∈ ker f ↔ f x = f y := by rw [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem disjoint_ker' {p : Submodule R M} :
Disjoint p (ker f) ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, ∀ y ∈ p, f x = f y → x = y :=
disjoint_ker.trans
⟨fun H x hx y hy h => eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| H _ (sub_mem hx hy) (by simp [h]),
fun H x h₁ h₂ => H x h₁ 0 (zero_mem _) (by simpa using h₂)⟩
theorem injOn_of_disjoint_ker {p : Submodule R M} {s : Set M} (h : s ⊆ p)
(hd : Disjoint p (ker f)) : Set.InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
disjoint_ker'.1 hd _ (h hx) _ (h hy)
variable (F) in
theorem _root_.LinearMapClass.ker_eq_bot : ker f = ⊥ ↔ Injective f := by
simpa [disjoint_iff_inf_le] using disjoint_ker' (f := f) (p := ⊤)
theorem ker_eq_bot {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} : ker f = ⊥ ↔ Injective f :=
LinearMapClass.ker_eq_bot _
@[simp] lemma injective_domRestrict_iff {f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂} {S : Submodule R M} :
Injective (f.domRestrict S) ↔ S ⊓ LinearMap.ker f = ⊥ := by
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ le_bot_iff.1 ?_, fun h ↦ le_bot_iff.1 ?_⟩
· intro x ⟨hx, h'x⟩
have : ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈ LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.domRestrict f S) := by simpa using h'x
rw [h] at this
simpa [mk_eq_zero] using this
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ h'x
have : x ∈ S ⊓ LinearMap.ker f := ⟨hx, h'x⟩
rw [h] at this
simpa [mk_eq_zero] using this
@[simp] theorem injective_restrict_iff_disjoint {p : Submodule R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] M}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ p, f x ∈ p) :
Injective (f.restrict hf) ↔ Disjoint p (ker f) := by
rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_restrict hf, ← ker_domRestrict, ker_eq_bot, injective_domRestrict_iff,
disjoint_iff]
end Ring
| section Semifield
variable [Semifield K]
variable [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
variable [AddCommMonoid V₂] [Module K V₂]
theorem ker_smul (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) (h : a ≠ 0) : ker (a • f) = ker f :=
Submodule.comap_smul f _ a h
theorem ker_smul' (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (a : K) : ker (a • f) = ⨅ _ : a ≠ 0, ker f :=
Submodule.comap_smul' f _ a
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Ker.lean | 214 | 225 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.DerivabilityStructure.Basic
/-!
# Constructor for derivability structures
In this file, we provide a constructor for right derivability structures.
Assume that `W₁` and `W₂` are classes of morphisms in categories `C₁` and `C₂`,
and that we have a localizer morphism `Φ : LocalizerMorphism W₁ W₂` that is
a localized equivalence, i.e. `Φ.functor` induces an equivalence of categories
between the localized categories. Assume moreover that `W₁` is multiplicative
and `W₂` contains identities. Then, `Φ` is a right derivability structure
(`LocalizerMorphism.IsRightDerivabilityStructure.mk'`) if it satisfies the
two following conditions:
* for any `X₂ : C₂`, the category `Φ.RightResolution X₂` of resolutions of `X₂` is connected
* any arrow in `C₂` admits a resolution (i.e. `Φ.arrow.HasRightResolutions` holds, where
`Φ.arrow` is the induced localizer morphism on categories of arrows in `C₁` and `C₂`)
This statement is essentially Lemme 6.5 in
[the paper by Kahn and Maltsiniotis][KahnMaltsiniotis2008].
## References
* [Bruno Kahn and Georges Maltsiniotis, *Structures de dérivabilité*][KahnMaltsiniotis2008]
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Localization
variable {C₁ C₂ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂]
{W₁ : MorphismProperty C₁} {W₂ : MorphismProperty C₂}
namespace LocalizerMorphism
namespace IsRightDerivabilityStructure
section
variable (Φ : LocalizerMorphism W₁ W₂)
[W₁.IsMultiplicative] [∀ X₂, IsConnected (Φ.RightResolution X₂)]
[Φ.arrow.HasRightResolutions] [W₂.ContainsIdentities]
namespace Constructor
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] (L : C₂ ⥤ D) [L.IsLocalization W₂]
{X₂ : C₂} {X₃ : D} (y : L.obj X₂ ⟶ X₃)
/-- Given `Φ : LocalizerMorphism W₁ W₂`, `L : C₂ ⥤ D` a localization functor for `W₂` and
a morphism `y : L.obj X₂ ⟶ X₃`, this is the functor which sends `R : Φ.RightResolution d` to
`(isoOfHom L W₂ R.w R.hw).inv ≫ y` in the category `w.CostructuredArrowDownwards y`
where `w` is `TwoSquare.mk Φ.functor (Φ.functor ⋙ L) L (𝟭 _) (Functor.rightUnitor _).inv`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def fromRightResolution :
Φ.RightResolution X₂ ⥤ (TwoSquare.mk Φ.functor (Φ.functor ⋙ L) L (𝟭 _)
(Functor.rightUnitor _).inv).CostructuredArrowDownwards y where
obj R := CostructuredArrow.mk (Y := StructuredArrow.mk R.w)
(StructuredArrow.homMk ((isoOfHom L W₂ R.w R.hw).inv ≫ y))
map {R R'} φ := CostructuredArrow.homMk (StructuredArrow.homMk φ.f) (by
ext
dsimp
rw [← assoc, ← cancel_epi (isoOfHom L W₂ R.w R.hw).hom,
isoOfHom_hom, isoOfHom_hom_inv_id_assoc, assoc, ← L.map_comp_assoc,
φ.comm, isoOfHom_hom_inv_id_assoc])
lemma isConnected :
IsConnected ((TwoSquare.mk Φ.functor (Φ.functor ⋙ L) L (𝟭 _)
(Functor.rightUnitor _).inv).CostructuredArrowDownwards y) := by
let w := (TwoSquare.mk Φ.functor (Φ.functor ⋙ L) L (𝟭 _) (Functor.rightUnitor _).inv)
have : Nonempty (w.CostructuredArrowDownwards y) :=
⟨(fromRightResolution Φ L y).obj (Classical.arbitrary _)⟩
suffices ∀ (X : w.CostructuredArrowDownwards y),
∃ Y, Zigzag X ((fromRightResolution Φ L y).obj Y) by
refine zigzag_isConnected (fun X X' => ?_)
obtain ⟨Y, hX⟩ := this X
obtain ⟨Y', hX'⟩ := this X'
exact hX.trans ((zigzag_obj_of_zigzag _ (isPreconnected_zigzag Y Y')).trans hX'.symm)
intro X
obtain ⟨c, g, x, fac, rfl⟩ := TwoSquare.CostructuredArrowDownwards.mk_surjective X
dsimp [w] at x fac
rw [id_comp] at fac
let ρ : Φ.arrow.RightResolution (Arrow.mk g) := Classical.arbitrary _
refine ⟨RightResolution.mk ρ.w.left ρ.hw.1, ?_⟩
have := zigzag_obj_of_zigzag
(fromRightResolution Φ L x ⋙ w.costructuredArrowDownwardsPrecomp x y g fac)
(isPreconnected_zigzag (RightResolution.mk (𝟙 _) (W₂.id_mem _))
(RightResolution.mk ρ.w.right ρ.hw.2))
refine Zigzag.trans ?_ (Zigzag.trans this ?_)
· exact Zigzag.of_hom (eqToHom (by simp))
· apply Zigzag.of_inv
refine CostructuredArrow.homMk (StructuredArrow.homMk ρ.X₁.hom (by simp)) ?_
ext
dsimp
rw [← cancel_epi (isoOfHom L W₂ ρ.w.left ρ.hw.1).hom, isoOfHom_hom,
isoOfHom_hom_inv_id_assoc, ← L.map_comp_assoc, Arrow.w_mk_right, Arrow.mk_hom,
L.map_comp, assoc, isoOfHom_hom_inv_id_assoc, fac]
end Constructor
| /-- If a localizer morphism `Φ` is a localized equivalence, then it is a right
derivability structure if the categories of right resolutions are connected and the
categories of right resolutions of arrows are nonempty. -/
lemma mk' [Φ.IsLocalizedEquivalence] : Φ.IsRightDerivabilityStructure := by
rw [Φ.isRightDerivabilityStructure_iff (Φ.functor ⋙ W₂.Q) W₂.Q (𝟭 _)
(Functor.rightUnitor _).symm, TwoSquare.guitartExact_iff_isConnected_downwards]
intro X₂ X₃ g
apply Constructor.isConnected
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/DerivabilityStructure/Constructor.lean | 104 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.Isometry
/-!
# Angles between points
This file defines unoriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.angle`, with notation `∠`, is the undirected angle determined by three
points.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ : P}
/-- The undirected angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and
`p₃`. If either of those points equals `p₂`, this is π/2. Use
`open scoped EuclideanGeometry` to access the `∠ p₁ p₂ p₃`
notation. -/
nonrec def angle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : V) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp (by fun_prop)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.angle_coe {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (p₁ p₂ p₃ : s) :
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
∠ (p₁ : P) (p₂ : P) (p₃ : P) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
s.subtypeₐᵢ.angle_map p₁ p₂ p₃
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vadd (v : V) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) (v +ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVAdd ℝ P v).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vadd_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (p : P) : ∠ (v₁ +ᵥ p) (v₂ +ᵥ p) (v₃ +ᵥ p) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vsub (p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (p -ᵥ p₁) (p -ᵥ p₂) (p -ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVSub ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vsub_const (p₁ p₂ p₃ p : P) : ∠ (p₁ -ᵥ p) (p₂ -ᵥ p) (p₃ -ᵥ p) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).symm.toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_add_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ + v) (v₂ + v) (v₃ + v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_vadd_const _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_add (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v + v₁) (v + v₂) (v + v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_const_vadd _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_sub_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ - v) (v₂ - v) (v₃ - v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_vsub_const v₁ v₂ v₃ v
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_sub (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v - v₁) (v - v₂) (v - v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_const_vsub v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (-v₁) (-v₂) (-v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using angle_const_sub 0 v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- The angle at a point does not depend on the order of the other two
points. -/
nonrec theorem angle_comm (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ :=
angle_comm _ _
/-- The angle at a point is nonnegative. -/
nonrec theorem angle_nonneg (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : 0 ≤ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
angle_nonneg _ _
/-- The angle at a point is at most π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_le_pi (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≤ π :=
angle_le_pi _ _
/-- The angle ∠AAB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_left (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p₀ p₀ p = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [vsub_self]
exact angle_zero_left _
/-- The angle ∠ABB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_right (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p p₀ p₀ = π / 2 := by rw [angle_comm, angle_self_left]
/-- The angle ∠ABA at a point is `0`, unless `A = B`. -/
theorem angle_self_of_ne (h : p ≠ p₀) : ∠ p p₀ p = 0 := angle_self <| vsub_ne_zero.2 h
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BAC is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨hp₁p₂, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
unfold angle
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_ne_zero] at hp₁p₂
use hp₁p₂, -r + 1, add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, smul_neg]
simp [← hpr]
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BCA is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 := by
rw [angle_comm] at h
exact angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left h
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ABC = ∠ABD. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi (p₁ : P) {p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (h : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₄ = π) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₄ := by
unfold angle at *
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
rw [eq_comm]
convert angle_smul_right_of_pos (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂) (add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one)
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₃, smul_neg, neg_smul, ← hpr]
simp
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ACB + ∠ACD = π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi (p₁ : P) {p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (h : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₄ = π) :
∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ + ∠ p₁ p₃ p₄ = π := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_comm p₁ p₃ p₂, angle_comm p₁ p₃ p₄]
unfold angle
exact angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi _ h
/-- **Vertical Angles Theorem**: angles opposite each other, formed by two intersecting straight
lines, are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ : P} (hapc : ∠ p₁ p₅ p₃ = π)
(hbpd : ∠ p₂ p₅ p₄ = π) : ∠ p₁ p₅ p₂ = ∠ p₃ p₅ p₄ := by
linarith [angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p₁ hbpd, angle_comm p₄ p₅ p₁,
angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p₄ hapc, angle_comm p₄ p₅ p₃]
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist A B ≠ 0. -/
theorem left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : dist p₁ p₂ ≠ 0 := by
by_contra heq
rw [dist_eq_zero] at heq
rw [heq, angle_self_left] at h
exact Real.pi_ne_zero (by linarith)
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist C B ≠ 0. -/
theorem right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : dist p₃ p₂ ≠ 0 :=
left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi <| (angle_comm _ _ _).trans h
/-- If ∠ABC = π, then (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = π if and only if (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi (fun he => hp₁p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
hp₃p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- If ∠ABC = 0, then (dist A C) = abs ((dist A B) - (dist B C)). -/
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_of_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0) :
dist p₁ p₃ = |dist p₁ p₂ - dist p₃ p₂| := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = 0 if and only if (dist A C) = abs ((dist A B) - (dist B C)). -/
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_iff_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₃ = |dist p₁ p₂ - dist p₃ p₂| ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero (fun he => hp₁p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he))
fun he => hp₃p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB, then ∠AMB = π. -/
theorem angle_midpoint_eq_pi (p₁ p₂ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₁ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ = π := by
simp only [angle, left_vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, right_vsub_midpoint, inv_pos, zero_lt_two,
angle_smul_right_of_pos, angle_smul_left_of_pos]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂]
apply angle_self_neg_of_nonzero
simpa only [ne_eq, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq]
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB and C is the same distance from A as it is from B
then ∠CMA = π / 2. -/
theorem angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₃ p₁ = dist p₃ p₂) :
∠ p₃ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₁ = π / 2 := by
let m : P := midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂
have h1 : p₃ -ᵥ p₁ = p₃ -ᵥ m - (p₁ -ᵥ m) := (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₃ p₁ m).symm
have h2 : p₃ -ᵥ p₂ = p₃ -ᵥ m + (p₁ -ᵥ m) := by
rw [left_vsub_midpoint, ← midpoint_vsub_right, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₁, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₂, h1, h2] at h
exact (norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (p₃ -ᵥ m) (p₁ -ᵥ m)).mp h.symm
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB and C is the same distance from A as it is from B
then ∠CMB = π / 2. -/
theorem angle_right_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₃ p₁ = dist p₃ p₂) :
∠ p₃ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ = π / 2 := by
rw [midpoint_comm p₁ p₂, angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h.symm]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at that point
is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff]
rcases h with ⟨⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, hp₂⟩, hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃⟩
refine ⟨vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂p₁.symm, -(1 - r) / r, ?_⟩
have hr0' : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₁
simp at hp₂p₁
have hr1' : r ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₃
simp at hp₂p₃
replace hr0 := hr0.lt_of_ne hr0'.symm
replace hr1 := hr1.lt_of_ne hr1'
refine ⟨div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 (sub_pos.2 hr1)) hr0, ?_⟩
rw [← hp₂, AffineMap.lineMap_apply, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self,
zero_sub, smul_neg, smul_smul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hr0', neg_smul, neg_neg, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ←
add_smul, sub_add_cancel, one_smul]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at that point
(reversed) is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [← h.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi, angle_comm]
/-- The angle between three points is π if and only if the second point is strictly between the
other two. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi⟩
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff]
rintro ⟨hp₁p₂, r, hr, hp₃p₂⟩
refine ⟨⟨1 / (1 - r), ⟨div_nonneg zero_le_one (sub_nonneg.2 (hr.le.trans zero_le_one)),
(div_le_one (sub_pos.2 (hr.trans zero_lt_one))).2 ((le_sub_self_iff 1).2 hr.le)⟩, ?_⟩,
(vsub_ne_zero.1 hp₁p₂).symm, ?_⟩
· rw [← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hp₃p₂
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, hp₃p₂, vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, smul_neg, ←
neg_smul, smul_add, smul_smul, ← add_smul, eq_comm, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
convert (one_smul ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁)).symm
field_simp [(sub_pos.2 (hr.trans zero_lt_one)).ne.symm]
ring
· rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, hp₃p₂, smul_ne_zero_iff]
exact ⟨hr.ne, hp₁p₂⟩
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, and not equal to the first,
the angle at the first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) :
∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
rw [angle, angle_eq_zero_iff]
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, rfl⟩
have hr0' : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp at hp₂p₁
replace hr0 := hr0.lt_of_ne hr0'.symm
refine ⟨vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂p₁, r⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hr0, ?_⟩
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self, add_zero, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr0', one_smul]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at the first point
is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_left
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, and not equal to the first,
the angle at the first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) :
∠ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by rw [← h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁, angle_comm]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at the first point
(reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_left
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, and not equal to the third,
the angle at the third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₃
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at the third point
is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_right
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, and not equal to the third,
the angle at the third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₃
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at the third point
(reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_right
/-- The angle between three points is zero if and only if one of the first and third points is
weakly between the other two, and not equal to the second. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ p₁ ≠ p₂ ∧ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂ ∧ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
constructor
· rw [angle, angle_eq_zero_iff]
rintro ⟨hp₁p₂, r, hr0, hp₃p₂⟩
rcases le_or_lt 1 r with (hr1 | hr1)
· refine Or.inl ⟨vsub_ne_zero.1 hp₁p₂, r⁻¹, ⟨(inv_pos.2 hr0).le, inv_le_one_of_one_le₀ hr1⟩, ?_⟩
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, hp₃p₂, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hr0.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· refine Or.inr ⟨?_, r, ⟨hr0.le, hr1.le⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, hp₃p₂, smul_ne_zero_iff]
exact ⟨hr0.ne.symm, hp₁p₂⟩
· rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, ← hp₃p₂, vsub_vadd]
· rintro (⟨hp₁p₂, h⟩ | ⟨hp₃p₂, h⟩)
· exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₁p₂
· exact h.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne hp₃p₂
/-- The angle between three points is zero if and only if one of the first and third points is
strictly between the other two, or those two points are equal but not equal to the second. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff_eq_and_ne_or_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ p₁ = p₃ ∧ p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₁p₃ : p₁ = p₃; · simp [hp₁p₃]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₁p₃, Ne.symm hp₁p₃, Sbtw, hp₃p₂]
/-- Three points are collinear if and only if the first or third point equals the second or the
angle between them is 0 or π. -/
theorem collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂ ∨ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· replace h := h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw
by_cases h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂
· exact Or.inl h₁₂
by_cases h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl h₃₂)
rw [or_iff_right h₁₂, or_iff_right h₃₂]
rcases h with (h | h | h)
· exact Or.inr (angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 ⟨h, Ne.symm h₁₂, Ne.symm h₃₂⟩)
· exact Or.inl (h.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne h₃₂)
· exact Or.inl (h.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne h₁₂)
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl | h | h)
· simpa using collinear_pair ℝ p₁ p₃
· simpa using collinear_pair ℝ p₁ p₃
· rw [angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw] at h
rcases h with (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩)
· rw [Set.insert_comm]
exact h.collinear
· rw [Set.insert_comm, Set.pair_comm]
exact h.collinear
| · rw [angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw] at h
exact h.wbtw.collinear
/-- If the angle between three points is 0, they are collinear. -/
theorem collinear_of_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) :=
collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl h
/-- If the angle between three points is π, they are collinear. -/
theorem collinear_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) :=
collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
/-- If three points are not collinear, the angle between them is nonzero. -/
theorem angle_ne_zero_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 :=
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 393 | 408 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.BigOperators
/-!
# Miscellaneous definitions, lemmas, and constructions using finsupp
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.graph`: the finset of input and output pairs with non-zero outputs.
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`: `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv.
* `Finsupp.mapDomain`: maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by a function and by summing.
* `Finsupp.comapDomain`: postcomposition of a `Finsupp` with a function injective on the preimage
of its support.
* `Finsupp.some`: restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported
function on `α`.
* `Finsupp.filter`: `filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true
and 0 otherwise.
* `Finsupp.frange`: the image of a finitely supported function on its support.
* `Finsupp.subtype_domain`: the restriction of a finitely supported function `f` to a subtype.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* This file is currently ~1600 lines long and is quite a miscellany of definitions and lemmas,
so it should be divided into smaller pieces.
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `graph` -/
section Graph
variable [Zero M]
/-- The graph of a finitely supported function over its support, i.e. the finset of input and output
pairs with non-zero outputs. -/
def graph (f : α →₀ M) : Finset (α × M) :=
f.support.map ⟨fun a => Prod.mk a (f a), fun _ _ h => (Prod.mk.inj h).1⟩
theorem mk_mem_graph_iff {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} : (a, m) ∈ f.graph ↔ f a = m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [graph, mem_map, mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, ha, rfl, -⟩
exact ⟨rfl, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff {c : α × M} {f : α →₀ M} : c ∈ f.graph ↔ f c.1 = c.2 ∧ c.2 ≠ 0 := by
cases c
exact mk_mem_graph_iff
theorem mk_mem_graph (f : α →₀ M) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ f.support) : (a, f a) ∈ f.graph :=
mk_mem_graph_iff.2 ⟨rfl, mem_support_iff.1 ha⟩
theorem apply_eq_of_mem_graph {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} (h : (a, m) ∈ f.graph) : f a = m :=
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).1
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut instance for `mem_graph_iff`.
theorem not_mem_graph_snd_zero (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (a, (0 : M)) ∉ f.graph := fun h =>
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).2.irrefl
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_graph [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) : f.graph.image Prod.fst = f.support := by
classical
simp only [graph, map_eq_image, image_image, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.comp_def, image_id']
theorem graph_injective (α M) [Zero M] : Injective (@graph α M _) := by
intro f g h
classical
have hsup : f.support = g.support := by rw [← image_fst_graph, h, image_fst_graph]
refine ext_iff'.2 ⟨hsup, fun x hx => apply_eq_of_mem_graph <| h.symm ▸ ?_⟩
exact mk_mem_graph _ (hsup ▸ hx)
@[simp]
theorem graph_inj {f g : α →₀ M} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem graph_zero : graph (0 : α →₀ M) = ∅ := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem graph_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.graph = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff' graph_zero
end Graph
end Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
namespace Finsupp
section Equiv
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf' : f.symm 0 = 0) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f hf : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm hf' : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_refl : mapRange.equiv (Equiv.refl M) rfl rfl = Equiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
Equiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.equiv_trans (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf') (f₂ : N ≃ P) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (hf₂') :
(mapRange.equiv (f.trans f₂) (by rw [Equiv.trans_apply, hf, hf₂])
(by rw [Equiv.symm_trans_apply, hf₂', hf']) :
(α →₀ _) ≃ _) =
(mapRange.equiv f hf hf').trans (mapRange.equiv f₂ hf₂ hf₂') :=
Equiv.ext <| mapRange_comp f₂ hf₂ f hf ((congrArg f₂ hf).trans hf₂)
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_symm (f : M ≃ N) (hf hf') :
((mapRange.equiv f hf hf').symm : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) = mapRange.equiv f.symm hf' hf :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end Equiv
section ZeroHom
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Composition with a fixed zero-preserving homomorphism is itself a zero-preserving homomorphism
on functions. -/
@[simps]
def mapRange.zeroHom (f : ZeroHom M N) : ZeroHom (α →₀ M) (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_id : mapRange.zeroHom (ZeroHom.id M) = ZeroHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
ZeroHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_comp (f : ZeroHom N P) (f₂ : ZeroHom M N) :
(mapRange.zeroHom (f.comp f₂) : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) =
(mapRange.zeroHom f).comp (mapRange.zeroHom f₂) :=
ZeroHom.ext <| mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
end ZeroHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Composition with a fixed additive homomorphism is itself an additive homomorphism on functions.
-/
@[simps]
def mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ N where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
-- Porting note: need either `dsimp only` or to specify `hf`:
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' := mapRange_add (hf := f.map_zero) f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_id :
mapRange.addMonoidHom (AddMonoidHom.id M) = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp (f : N →+ P) (f₂ : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f.comp f₂) : (α →₀ _) →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom f₂) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <|
mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom (f : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).toZeroHom = (mapRange.zeroHom f.toZeroHom : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) :=
ZeroHom.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_multiset_sum (f : F) (m : Multiset (α →₀ M)) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) m.sum = (m.map fun x => mapRange f (map_zero f) x).sum :=
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ _) →+ _).map_multiset_sum _
theorem mapRange_finset_sum (f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (∑ x ∈ s, g x) = ∑ x ∈ s, mapRange f (map_zero f) (g x) :=
map_sum (mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N)) _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange.AddMonoidHom` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.addEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ N) :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl }
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_refl : mapRange.addEquiv (AddEquiv.refl M) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_trans (f : M ≃+ N) (f₂ : N ≃+ P) :
(mapRange.addEquiv (f.trans f₂) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ P)) =
(mapRange.addEquiv f).trans (mapRange.addEquiv f₂) :=
AddEquiv.ext (mapRange_comp _ f₂.map_zero _ f.map_zero (by simp))
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_symm (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f).symm : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) = mapRange.addEquiv f.symm :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) : _ →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ _) →+ _) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) :
↑(mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) =
(mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) f.map_zero f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end AddMonoidHom
end Finsupp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `equivCongrLeft` -/
section EquivCongrLeft
variable [Zero M]
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, we can map `l : α →₀ M` to `equivMapDomain f l : β →₀ M` (computably)
by mapping the support forwards and the function backwards. -/
def equivMapDomain (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := l.support.map f.toEmbedding
toFun a := l (f.symm a)
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [Finset.mem_map_equiv, mem_support_toFun]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (b : β) :
equivMapDomain f l b = l (f.symm b) :=
rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : β →₀ M) (a : α) :
equivMapDomain f.symm l a = l (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_refl (l : α →₀ M) : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) l = l := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_refl' : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) = @id (α →₀ M) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain (f.trans g) l = equivMapDomain g (equivMapDomain f l) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans' (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
@equivMapDomain _ _ M _ (f.trans g) = equivMapDomain g ∘ equivMapDomain f := by ext x; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_single (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : M) :
equivMapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b := by
classical
ext x
simp only [single_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, equivMapDomain_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_zero {f : α ≃ β} : equivMapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) := by
ext; simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_equivMapDomain [CommMonoid N] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (g : β → M → N) :
prod (equivMapDomain f l) g = prod l (fun a m => g (f a) m) := by
simp [prod, equivMapDomain]
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, the finitely supported function spaces are also in bijection:
`(α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M)`.
This is the finitely-supported version of `Equiv.piCongrLeft`. -/
def equivCongrLeft (f : α ≃ β) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M) := by
refine ⟨equivMapDomain f, equivMapDomain f.symm, fun f => ?_, fun f => ?_⟩ <;> ext x <;>
simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : equivCongrLeft f l = equivMapDomain f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_symm (f : α ≃ β) :
(@equivCongrLeft _ _ M _ f).symm = equivCongrLeft f.symm :=
rfl
end Finsupp
end EquivCongrLeft
section CastFinsupp
variable [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M)
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommSemiring R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_sum _ _
end Nat
namespace Int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommRing R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommGroupWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_sum _ _
end Int
namespace Rat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_sum _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [Field R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
end Rat
end CastFinsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapDomain` -/
namespace Finsupp
section MapDomain
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {v v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `mapDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `a : β` is the sum
of `v x` over all `x` such that `f x = a`. -/
def mapDomain (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M :=
v.sum fun a => single (f a)
theorem mapDomain_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum_eq_single a, single_eq_same]
· intro b _ hba
exact single_eq_of_ne (hf.ne hba)
· intro _
rw [single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem mapDomain_notin_range {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f x a = 0 := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun a' _ => single_eq_of_ne fun eq => h <| eq ▸ Set.mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_id : mapDomain id v = v :=
sum_single _
theorem mapDomain_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
mapDomain (g ∘ f) v = mapDomain g (mapDomain f v) := by
refine ((sum_sum_index ?_ ?_).trans ?_).symm
· intro
exact single_zero _
· intro
exact single_add _
refine sum_congr fun _ _ => sum_single_index ?_
exact single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_single {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : M} : mapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b :=
sum_single_index <| single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_zero {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) :=
sum_zero_index
theorem mapDomain_congr {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ x ∈ v.support, f x = g x) :
v.mapDomain f = v.mapDomain g :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ H => by simp only [h _ H]
theorem mapDomain_add {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) = mapDomain f v₁ + mapDomain f v₂ :=
sum_add_index' (fun _ => single_zero _) fun _ => single_add _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_equiv_apply {f : α ≃ β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) :
mapDomain f x a = x (f.symm a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply a]
exact mapDomain_apply f.injective _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α → β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun := mapDomain f
map_zero' := mapDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := mapDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_id : mapDomain.addMonoidHom id = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_id
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f ∘ g) : (α →₀ M) →+ γ →₀ M) =
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom g) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_comp
theorem mapDomain_finset_sum {f : α → β} {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (∑ i ∈ s, v i) = ∑ i ∈ s, mapDomain f (v i) :=
map_sum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) _ _
theorem mapDomain_sum [Zero N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ N} {v : α → N → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
map_finsuppSum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M) _ _
theorem mapDomain_support [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} :
(s.mapDomain f).support ⊆ s.support.image f :=
Finset.Subset.trans support_sum <|
Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.biUnion_mono fun _ _ => support_single_subset) <| by
rw [Finset.biUnion_singleton]
theorem mapDomain_apply' (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (hS : (x.support : Set α) ⊆ S)
(hf : Set.InjOn f S) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ S) : mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
classical
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
simp_rw [single_apply]
by_cases hax : a ∈ x.support
· rw [← Finset.add_sum_erase _ _ hax, if_pos rfl]
convert add_zero (x a)
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact (hf.mono hS).ne (Finset.mem_of_mem_erase hi) hax (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hi)
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hax]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact hf.ne (hS hi) ha (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hax)
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (s : α →₀ M)
(hf : Set.InjOn f s.support) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm mapDomain_support <| by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Ne] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx_w, hx_h_left, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_iff, Ne]
rw [mapDomain_apply' (↑s.support : Set _) _ _ hf]
· exact hx_h_left
· simp only [mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Ne]
exact hx_h_left
· exact Subset.refl _
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injective [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : α →₀ M) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
mapDomain_support_of_injOn s hf.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(h_zero : ∀ b, h b 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀ b m₁ m₂, h b (m₁ + m₂) = h b m₁ * h b m₂) :
(mapDomain f s).prod h = s.prod fun a m => h (f a) m :=
(prod_sum_index h_zero h_add).trans <| prod_congr fun _ _ => prod_single_index (h_zero _)
-- Note that in `prod_mapDomain_index`, `M` is still an additive monoid,
-- so there is no analogous version in terms of `MonoidHom`.
/-- A version of `sum_mapDomain_index` that takes a bundled `AddMonoidHom`,
rather than separate linearity hypotheses.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom [AddCommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M}
(h : β → M →+ N) : ((mapDomain f s).sum fun b m => h b m) = s.sum fun a m => h (f a) m :=
sum_mapDomain_index (fun b => (h b).map_zero) (fun b _ _ => (h b).map_add _ _)
theorem embDomain_eq_mapDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : embDomain f v = mapDomain f v := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [mapDomain_apply f.injective, embDomain_apply]
· rw [mapDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range] <;> assumption
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index_inj [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (s.mapDomain f).prod h = s.prod fun a b => h (f a) b := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk f hf, ← embDomain_eq_mapDomain, prod_embDomain]
theorem mapDomain_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) := by
intro v₁ v₂ eq
ext a
have : mapDomain f v₁ (f a) = mapDomain f v₂ (f a) := by rw [eq]
rwa [mapDomain_apply hf, mapDomain_apply hf] at this
/-- When `f` is an embedding we have an embedding `(α →₀ ℕ) ↪ (β →₀ ℕ)` given by `mapDomain`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ ℕ) ↪ β →₀ ℕ :=
⟨Finsupp.mapDomain f, Finsupp.mapDomain_injective f.injective⟩
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (g : M →+ N) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom g) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom g).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) := by
ext
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Finsupp.mapRange_single, Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_apply,
Finsupp.singleAddHom_apply, eq_self_iff_true, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.mapDomain_single,
Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_apply]
/-- When `g` preserves addition, `mapRange` and `mapDomain` commute. -/
theorem mapDomain_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) (g : M → N) (h0 : g 0 = 0)
(hadd : ∀ x y, g (x + y) = g x + g y) :
mapDomain f (mapRange g h0 v) = mapRange g h0 (mapDomain f v) :=
let g' : M →+ N :=
{ toFun := g
map_zero' := h0
map_add' := hadd }
DFunLike.congr_fun (mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange f g') v
theorem sum_update_add [AddZeroClass α] [AddCommMonoid β] (f : ι →₀ α) (i : ι) (a : α)
(g : ι → α → β) (hg : ∀ i, g i 0 = 0)
(hgg : ∀ (j : ι) (a₁ a₂ : α), g j (a₁ + a₂) = g j a₁ + g j a₂) :
(f.update i a).sum g + g i (f i) = f.sum g + g i a := by
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg]
conv_rhs => rw [← Finsupp.update_self f i]
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg, add_assoc, add_assoc]
congr 1
rw [add_comm, sum_single_index (hg _), sum_single_index (hg _)]
theorem mapDomain_injOn (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (hf : Set.InjOn f S) :
Set.InjOn (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) { w | (w.support : Set α) ⊆ S } := by
intro v₁ hv₁ v₂ hv₂ eq
ext a
classical
by_cases h : a ∈ v₁.support ∪ v₂.support
· rw [← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₁ hf _, ← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₂ hf _, eq] <;>
· apply Set.union_subset hv₁ hv₂
exact mod_cast h
· simp only [not_or, mem_union, not_not, mem_support_iff] at h
simp [h]
theorem equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain {M} [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain f l = mapDomain f l := by ext x; simp [mapDomain_equiv_apply]
end MapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `comapDomain` -/
section ComapDomain
/-- Given `f : α → β`, `l : β →₀ M` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on
the preimage of `l.support`, `comapDomain f l hf` is the finitely supported function
from `α` to `M` given by composing `l` with `f`. -/
@[simps support]
def comapDomain [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support)) :
α →₀ M where
support := l.support.preimage f hf
toFun a := l (f a)
mem_support_toFun := by
intro a
simp only [Finset.mem_def.symm, Finset.mem_preimage]
exact l.mem_support_toFun (f a)
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_apply [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support))
(a : α) : comapDomain f l hf a = l (f a) :=
rfl
theorem sum_comapDomain [Zero M] [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (g : β → M → N)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) :
(comapDomain f l hf.injOn).sum (g ∘ f) = l.sum g := by
simp only [sum, comapDomain_apply, (· ∘ ·), comapDomain]
exact Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij f _ hf fun x => g x (l x)
theorem eq_zero_of_comapDomain_eq_zero [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) : comapDomain f l hf.injOn = 0 → l = 0 := by
rw [← support_eq_empty, ← support_eq_empty, comapDomain]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, mem_preimage]
intro h a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hf.2.2 ha
exact h b (hb.2.symm ▸ ha)
section FInjective
section Zero
variable [Zero M]
lemma embDomain_comapDomain {f : α ↪ β} {g : β →₀ M} (hg : ↑g.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
embDomain f (comapDomain f g f.injective.injOn) = g := by
ext b
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hb
rw [embDomain_apply, comapDomain_apply]
· replace hg : g b = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.mp <| mt (hg ·) hb
rw [embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ hb, hg]
/-- Note the `hif` argument is needed for this to work in `rw`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_zero (f : α → β)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(0 : β →₀ M).support) := Finset.coe_empty ▸ (Set.injOn_empty f)) :
comapDomain f (0 : β →₀ M) hif = (0 : α →₀ M) := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_single (f : α → β) (a : α) (m : M)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' (single (f a) m).support)) :
comapDomain f (Finsupp.single (f a) m) hif = Finsupp.single a m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp only [single_zero, comapDomain_zero]
· rw [eq_single_iff, comapDomain_apply, comapDomain_support, ← Finset.coe_subset, coe_preimage,
support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton, coe_singleton, single_eq_same]
rw [support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton] at hif
exact ⟨fun x hx => hif hx rfl hx, rfl⟩
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {f : α → β}
theorem comapDomain_add (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) (hv₁ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₁.support))
(hv₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₂.support)) (hv₁₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(v₁ + v₂).support)) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hv₁₂ = comapDomain f v₁ hv₁ + comapDomain f v₂ hv₂ := by
ext
simp only [comapDomain_apply, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
/-- A version of `Finsupp.comapDomain_add` that's easier to use. -/
theorem comapDomain_add_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hf.injOn =
comapDomain f v₁ hf.injOn + comapDomain f v₂ hf.injOn :=
comapDomain_add _ _ _ _ _
/-- `Finsupp.comapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def comapDomain.addMonoidHom (hf : Function.Injective f) : (β →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun x := comapDomain f x hf.injOn
map_zero' := comapDomain_zero f
map_add' := comapDomain_add_of_injective hf
end AddZeroClass
variable [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → β)
theorem mapDomain_comapDomain (hf : Function.Injective f) (l : β →₀ M)
(hl : ↑l.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f (comapDomain f l hf.injOn) = l := by
conv_rhs => rw [← embDomain_comapDomain (f := ⟨f, hf⟩) hl (M := M), embDomain_eq_mapDomain]
rfl
end FInjective
end ComapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is an `Option` type -/
section Option
/-- Restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported function on `α`. -/
def some [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) : α →₀ M :=
f.comapDomain Option.some fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem some_apply [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) (a : α) : f.some a = f (Option.some a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem some_zero [Zero M] : (0 : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_add [AddZeroClass M] (f g : Option α →₀ M) : (f + g).some = f.some + g.some := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_none [Zero M] (m : M) : (single none m : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_some [Zero M] (a : α) (m : M) :
(single (Option.some a) m : Option α →₀ M).some = single a m := by
classical
ext b
simp [single_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_option_index [AddZeroClass M] [CommMonoid N] (f : Option α →₀ M)
(b : Option α → M → N) (h_zero : ∀ o, b o 0 = 1)
(h_add : ∀ o m₁ m₂, b o (m₁ + m₂) = b o m₁ * b o m₂) :
f.prod b = b none (f none) * f.some.prod fun a => b (Option.some a) := by
classical
induction f using induction_linear with
| zero => simp [some_zero, h_zero]
| add f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ =>
rw [Finsupp.prod_add_index, h₁, h₂, some_add, Finsupp.prod_add_index]
· simp only [h_add, Pi.add_apply, Finsupp.coe_add]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
all_goals simp [h_zero, h_add]
| single a m => cases a <;> simp [h_zero, h_add]
theorem sum_option_index_smul [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (f : Option α →₀ R)
(b : Option α → M) :
(f.sum fun o r => r • b o) = f none • b none + f.some.sum fun a r => r • b (Option.some a) :=
f.sum_option_index _ (fun _ => zero_smul _ _) fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
theorem eq_option_embedding_update_none_iff [Zero M] {n : Option α →₀ M} {m : α →₀ M} {i : M} :
(n = (embDomain Embedding.some m).update none i) ↔
n none = i ∧ n.some = m := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff, Option.forall, Finsupp.ext_iff]
apply and_congr
· simp
· apply forall_congr'
intro
simp only [coe_update, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, update_of_ne, some_apply]
rw [← Embedding.some_apply, embDomain_apply, Embedding.some_apply]
@[simp] lemma some_embDomain_some [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : (f.embDomain .some).some = f := by
ext; rw [some_apply]; exact embDomain_apply _ _ _
@[simp] lemma embDomain_some_none [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : f.embDomain .some .none = 0 :=
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ (by simp)
end Option
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.filter` -/
section Filter
section Zero
variable [Zero M] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M)
/--
`Finsupp.filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true and `0`
otherwise. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
toFun a := if p a then f a else 0
support := f.support.filter p
mem_support_toFun a := by
split_ifs with h <;>
· simp only [h, mem_filter, mem_support_iff]
tauto
theorem filter_apply (a : α) : f.filter p a = if p a then f a else 0 := rfl
theorem filter_eq_indicator : ⇑(f.filter p) = Set.indicator { x | p x } f := by
ext
simp [filter_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
theorem filter_eq_zero_iff : f.filter p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 := by
| simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean | 812 | 814 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Group
/-!
# Isomorphisms of `R`-algebras
This file defines bundled isomorphisms of `R`-algebras.
## Main definitions
* `AlgEquiv R A B`: the type of `R`-algebra isomorphisms between `A` and `B`.
## Notations
* `A ≃ₐ[R] B` : `R`-algebra equivalence from `A` to `B`.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
/-- An equivalence of algebras (denoted as `A ≃ₐ[R] B`)
is an equivalence of rings commuting with the actions of scalars. -/
structure AlgEquiv (R : Type u) (A : Type v) (B : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] extends A ≃ B, A ≃* B, A ≃+ B, A ≃+* B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
protected commutes' : ∀ r : R, toFun (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toAddEquiv
attribute [nolint docBlame] AlgEquiv.toMulEquiv
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 A " ≃ₐ[" R "] " A' => AlgEquiv R A A'
/-- `AlgEquivClass F R A B` states that `F` is a type of algebra structure preserving
equivalences. You should extend this class when you extend `AlgEquiv`. -/
class AlgEquivClass (F : Type*) (R A B : outParam Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] : Prop
extends RingEquivClass F A B where
/-- An equivalence of algebras commutes with the action of scalars. -/
commutes : ∀ (f : F) (r : R), f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r
namespace AlgEquivClass
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) toAlgHomClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] :
AlgHomClass F R A B :=
{ h with }
instance (priority := 100) toLinearEquivClass (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
[Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [h : AlgEquivClass F R A B] : LinearEquivClass F R A B :=
{ h with map_smulₛₗ := fun f => map_smulₛₗ f }
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AlgEquivClass F R A B` into an actual `AlgEquiv`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `A ≃ₐ[R] B`. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgEquiv {F R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A]
[Algebra R B] [EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] (f : F) : A ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A ≃ B), (f : A ≃+* B) with commutes' := commutes f }
instance (F R A B : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
[EquivLike F A B] [AlgEquivClass F R A B] : CoeTC F (A ≃ₐ[R] B) :=
⟨toAlgEquiv⟩
end AlgEquivClass
namespace AlgEquiv
universe uR uA₁ uA₂ uA₃ uA₁' uA₂' uA₃'
variable {R : Type uR}
variable {A₁ : Type uA₁} {A₂ : Type uA₂} {A₃ : Type uA₃}
variable {A₁' : Type uA₁'} {A₂' : Type uA₂'} {A₃' : Type uA₃'}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A₁] [Semiring A₂] [Semiring A₃]
variable [Semiring A₁'] [Semiring A₂'] [Semiring A₃']
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁'] [Algebra R A₂'] [Algebra R A₃']
variable (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂)
section coe
instance : EquivLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
obtain ⟨⟨f,_⟩,_⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨g,_⟩,_⟩ := g
congr
/-- Helper instance since the coercion is not always found. -/
instance : FunLike (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) A₁ A₂ where
coe := DFunLike.coe
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective'
instance : AlgEquivClass (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) R A₁ A₂ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_mul f := f.map_mul'
commutes f := f.commutes'
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
protected theorem congr_arg {f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} {x x' : A₁} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} (h : f = g) (x : A₁) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {toEquiv map_mul map_add commutes} :
⇑(⟨toEquiv, map_mul, map_add, commutes⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = toEquiv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨e, e', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = e :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem toEquiv_eq_coe : e.toEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_coe {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂] (f : F) :
⇑(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_fun_injective : @Function.Injective (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ → A₂) fun e => (e : A₁ → A₂) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
instance hasCoeToRingEquiv : CoeOut (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
⟨AlgEquiv.toRingEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_toEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃ A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toRingEquiv_eq_coe : e.toRingEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toRingEquiv_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ringEquiv : ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ringEquiv' : (e.toRingEquiv : A₁ → A₂) = e :=
rfl
theorem coe_ringEquiv_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ ≃+* A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| RingEquiv.congr_fun h
/-- Interpret an algebra equivalence as an algebra homomorphism.
This definition is included for symmetry with the other `to*Hom` projections.
The `simp` normal form is to use the coercion of the `AlgHomClass.coeTC` instance. -/
@[coe]
def toAlgHom : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂ :=
{ e with
map_one' := map_one e
map_zero' := map_zero e }
@[simp]
theorem toAlgHom_eq_coe : e.toAlgHom = e :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_algHom : DFunLike.coe (e.toAlgHom) = DFunLike.coe e :=
rfl
theorem coe_algHom_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| AlgHom.congr_fun h
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma toAlgHom_toRingHom : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = e :=
rfl
/-- The two paths coercion can take to a `RingHom` are equivalent -/
theorem coe_ringHom_commutes : ((e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) = ((e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) : A₁ →+* A₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem commutes : ∀ r : R, e (algebraMap R A₁ r) = algebraMap R A₂ r :=
e.commutes'
end coe
section bijective
protected theorem bijective : Function.Bijective e :=
EquivLike.bijective e
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective e :=
EquivLike.injective e
protected theorem surjective : Function.Surjective e :=
EquivLike.surjective e
end bijective
section refl
/-- Algebra equivalences are reflexive. -/
@[refl]
def refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ (.refl _ : A₁ ≃+* A₁) with commutes' := fun _ => rfl }
instance : Inhabited (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_toAlgHom : ↑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgHom.id R A₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_refl : ⇑(refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = id :=
rfl
end refl
section symm
/-- Algebra equivalences are symmetric. -/
@[symm]
def symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁ :=
{ e.toRingEquiv.symm with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [← e.toRingEquiv.symm_apply_apply (algebraMap R A₁ r)]
congr
simp }
theorem invFun_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : e.invFun = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply_coe_coe_symm_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₂) :
f ((f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm x) = x :=
EquivLike.right_inv f x
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe_symm_apply_coe_apply {F : Type*} [EquivLike F A₁ A₂] [AlgEquivClass F R A₁ A₂]
(f : F) (x : A₁) :
(f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm (f x) = x :=
EquivLike.left_inv f x
/-- `simp` normal form of `invFun_eq_symm` -/
@[simp]
theorem symm_toEquiv_eq_symm {e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂} : (e : A₁ ≃ A₂).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (symm : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) → A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe' (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, e, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = e.symm :=
symm_bijective.injective <| ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Auxiliary definition to avoid looping in `dsimp` with `AlgEquiv.symm_mk`. -/
protected def symm_mk.aux (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :=
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk (f f') (h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅) :
(⟨⟨f, f', h₁, h₂⟩, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂).symm =
{ symm_mk.aux f f' h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅ with
toFun := f'
invFun := f } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm : (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁).symm = AlgEquiv.refl :=
rfl
--this should be a simp lemma but causes a lint timeout
theorem toRingEquiv_symm (f : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) : (f : A₁ ≃+* A₁).symm = f.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toRingEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toAddEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃+ A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃+ A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_toMulEquiv : (e.symm : A₂ ≃* A₁) = (e : A₁ ≃* A₂).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : ∀ x, e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply
theorem symm_apply_eq (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
e.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem eq_symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
e.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ↑e.symm = AlgHom.id R A₂ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : AlgHom.comp ↑e.symm (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) = AlgHom.id R A₁ := by
ext
simp
theorem leftInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e :=
e.left_inv
theorem rightInverse_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e :=
e.right_inv
end symm
section simps
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ → A₂ :=
e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.toEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₁ ≃ A₂ :=
e
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : A₂ → A₁ :=
e.symm
initialize_simps_projections AlgEquiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
end simps
section trans
/-- Algebra equivalences are transitive. -/
@[trans]
def trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₃ :=
{ e₁.toRingEquiv.trans e₂.toRingEquiv with
commutes' := fun r => show e₂.toFun (e₁.toFun _) = _ by rw [e₁.commutes', e₂.commutes'] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) : ⇑(e₁.trans e₂) = e₂ ∘ e₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₁) : (e₁.trans e₂) x = e₂ (e₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (x : A₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).symm x = e₁.symm (e₂.symm x) :=
rfl
end trans
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₁'` and `A₂` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂'`. -/
@[simps apply]
def arrowCongr (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) ≃ (A₁' →ₐ[R] A₂') where
toFun f := (e₂.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.symm.toAlgHom
invFun f := (e₂.symm.toAlgHom.comp f).comp e₁.toAlgHom
left_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, symm_comp]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, symm_comp, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
right_inv f := by
simp only [AlgHom.comp_assoc, toAlgHom_eq_coe, comp_symm]
simp only [← AlgHom.comp_assoc, comp_symm, AlgHom.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_id]
theorem arrowCongr_comp (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₃ : A₃ ≃ₐ[R] A₃') (f : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) (g : A₂ →ₐ[R] A₃) :
arrowCongr e₁ e₃ (g.comp f) = (arrowCongr e₂ e₃ g).comp (arrowCongr e₁ e₂ f) := by
ext
simp only [arrowCongr, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, AlgHom.comp_apply]
congr
exact (e₂.symm_apply_apply _).symm
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_refl : arrowCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_trans (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e₁' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂')
(e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) (e₂' : A₂' ≃ₐ[R] A₃') :
arrowCongr (e₁.trans e₂) (e₁'.trans e₂') = (arrowCongr e₁ e₁').trans (arrowCongr e₂ e₂') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem arrowCongr_symm (e₁ : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') (e₂ : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
(arrowCongr e₁ e₂).symm = arrowCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
/-- If `A₁` is equivalent to `A₂` and `A₁'` is equivalent to `A₂'`, then the type of maps
`A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁'` is equivalent to the type of maps `A₂ ≃ ₐ[R] A₂'`.
This is the `AlgEquiv` version of `AlgEquiv.arrowCongr`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivCongr (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂') : (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') ≃ A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₂' where
toFun ψ := e.symm.trans (ψ.trans e')
invFun ψ := e.trans (ψ.trans e'.symm)
left_inv ψ := by
ext
simp_rw [trans_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv ψ := by
ext
simp_rw [trans_apply, apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_refl : equivCongr AlgEquiv.refl AlgEquiv.refl = Equiv.refl (A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁') :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongr_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (e' : A₁' ≃ₐ[R] A₂') :
| (equivCongr e e').symm = equivCongr e.symm e'.symm :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Equiv.lean | 439 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [continuousOn_iff']
constructor
· intro h t ht
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu]
apply IsOpen.inter u_open hs
· intro h t ht
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, ?_⟩
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self]
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
(continuousOn_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_preimage {t : Set β} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hp : f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) := by
convert (continuousOn_open_iff hs).mp h t ht
rw [inter_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hp]
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rcases continuousOn_iff_isClosed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu.2]
apply IsClosed.inter hu.1 hs
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
calc
s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter (Subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
(hf.isOpen_inter_preimage hs isOpen_interior)
_ = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) := by rw [interior_inter, hs.interior_eq]
theorem continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ContinuousOn f (s ∩ t)) : ContinuousOn f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩
rwa [ContinuousWithinAt, ← nhdsWithin_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
theorem continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ T, f x ∈ t → f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
forall₂_congr fun x _ => by
delta ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun t => forall_swap
theorem continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ T, IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t)) :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s :=
continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff.2 fun _x hx t ht hxt => mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨_, h t ht, ⟨hx, hxt⟩, fun _y hy => hy.1.2⟩
/-!
### Congruence and monotonicity properties with respect to sets
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
/-- If two sets coincide around `x`, then being continuous within one or the other at `x` is
equivalent. See also `continuousWithinAt_congr_set'` which requires that the sets coincide
locally away from a point `y`, in a T1 space. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq.mpr h]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_set (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f t x :=
(continuousWithinAt_congr_set h).1 hf
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_union :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
/- `continuousWithinAt_insert` gives the same equivalence but at a point `y` possibly different
from `x`. As this requires the space to be T1, and this property is not available in this file,
this is found in another file although it is part of the basic API for `continuousWithinAt`. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h => (h.union ht).mono <| by simp only [diff_union_self, subset_union_left], fun h =>
h.mono diff_subset⟩
/-- See also `continuousWithinAt_diff_singleton` for the case of `s \ {y}`, but
requiring `T1Space α. -/
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_diff_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ {x}) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_singleton.diff_iff
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_compl_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f {x}ᶜ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, continuousWithinAt_diff_self, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousOn.mono (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (hf x (h hx)).mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono _ h)
theorem antitone_continuousOn {f : α → β} : Antitone (ContinuousOn f) := fun _s _t hst hf =>
hf.mono hst
/-!
### Relation between `ContinuousAt` and `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
theorem ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
ContinuousWithinAt.mono ((continuousWithinAt_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [← univ_inter s, continuousWithinAt_inter h, continuousWithinAt_univ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt hs).mp h
theorem IsOpen.continuousOn_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ContinuousAt f a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt ∘ hs.mem_nhds
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousAt (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).continuousAt hx
theorem continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (hcont x hx).continuousWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-30")]
alias ContinuousAt.continuousOn := continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.continuousOn (h : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at h
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
theorem Continuous.continuousWithinAt (h : Continuous f) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
/-!
### Congruence properties with respect to functions
-/
theorem ContinuousOn.congr_mono (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn g s₁ := by
intro x hx
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at A
rw [← h' hx] at A
exact A.congr' h'.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin.symm
theorem ContinuousOn.congr (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (Subset.refl _)
theorem continuousOn_congr (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
⟨fun h => ContinuousOn.congr h h'.symm, fun h => h.congr h'⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : f x = g x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx, tendsto_congr' h, ContinuousWithinAt]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
(h₁.congr_continuousWithinAt hx).2 h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_mem (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h.symm hx,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem h hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h₁ : g =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] f) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (nhdsWithin_mono _ (subset_insert _ _) h₁)
(mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert _ _) h₁ :)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt_of_insert (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[insert x s] x] g) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h.symm,
fun h' ↦ h'.congr_of_eventuallyEq_insert h⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : g x = f x) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr_of_eventuallyEq (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin h₁) hx
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.congr (fun x hx ↦ (h₁ x hx).symm) hx.symm, fun h' ↦ h'.congr h₁ hx⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_mem (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_of_mem (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_insert (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, g y = f y) : ContinuousWithinAt g s x :=
h.congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_of_insert
(h₁ : ∀ y ∈ insert x s, g y = f y) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_congr (fun y hy ↦ h₁ y (mem_insert_of_mem _ hy)) (h₁ x (mem_insert _ _))
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_mono
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : g x = f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt g s₁ x :=
(h.mono h₁).congr h' hx
theorem ContinuousAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : ContinuousAt f x) (hg : g =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
ContinuousAt g x := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ] at h ⊢
exact h.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (by rwa [nhdsWithin_univ]) (mem_univ x)
/-!
### Composition
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin h)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : f x = y) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp hf h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_inter {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_inter_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_inter hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within f hf h)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x)
(hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin hf h
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image {g : β → γ} {t : Set β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
(hg.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hs).comp hf (mapsTo_image f s)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image_of_eq {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(hs : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] y) (hy : f x = y) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_of_mem_nhdsWithin_image hf hs
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt {g : β → γ}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.continuousWithinAt.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt_of_eq {g : β → γ} {y : β}
(hg : ContinuousAt g y) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hy : f x = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x := by
subst hy; exact hg.comp_continuousWithinAt hf
/-- See also `ContinuousOn.comp'` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)` instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.comp {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx =>
ContinuousWithinAt.comp (hg _ (h hx)) (hf x hx) h
/-- Variant of `ContinuousOn.comp` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)` instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (fun x => g (f x)) s :=
ContinuousOn.comp hg hf h
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp_inter {g : β → γ} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
/-- See also `Continuous.comp_continuousOn'` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)`
instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
theorem Continuous.comp_continuousOn {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.continuousOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
/-- Variant of `Continuous.comp_continuousOn` using the form `fun y ↦ g (f y)`
instead of `g ∘ f`. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.comp_continuousOn' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ g (f x)) s :=
hg.comp_continuousOn hf
theorem ContinuousOn.comp_continuous {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(hf : Continuous f) (hs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s) : Continuous (g ∘ f) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at *
exact hg.comp hf fun x _ => hs x
theorem ContinuousOn.image_comp_continuous {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hg : ContinuousOn g (f '' s)) (hf : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.comp hf.continuousOn (s.mapsTo_image f)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_continuousWithinAt {f : β × γ → δ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} {x : α}
{s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousAt f (g x, h x)) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x)
(hh : ContinuousWithinAt h s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) s x :=
ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt hf (hg.prodMk_nhds hh)
theorem ContinuousAt.comp₂_continuousWithinAt_of_eq {f : β × γ → δ} {g : α → β}
{h : α → γ} {x : α} {s : Set α} {y : β × γ} (hf : ContinuousAt f y)
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) (hh : ContinuousWithinAt h s x) (e : (g x, h x) = y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x ↦ f (g x, h x)) s x := by
rw [← e] at hf
exact hf.comp₂_continuousWithinAt hg hh
/-!
### Image
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
haveI := mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 hx
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_preimage_image f s)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : f x ∈ closure t :=
closure_mono (image_subset_iff.2 ht) (h.mem_closure_image hx)
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousWithinAt {t : Set β}
(h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) := fun x hx => (hc x hx).mem_closure hx h
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousOn {t : Set β} (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) : MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) :=
h.closure_of_continuousWithinAt fun x hx => (hc x hx).mono subset_closure
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.image_closure
(hf : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
((mapsTo_image f s).closure_of_continuousWithinAt hf).image_subset
theorem ContinuousOn.image_closure (hf : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
ContinuousWithinAt.image_closure fun x hx => (hf x hx).mono subset_closure
/-!
### Product
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.prodMk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
hf.prodMk_nhds hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias ContinuousWithinAt.prod := ContinuousWithinAt.prodMk
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.prodMk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias ContinuousOn.prod := ContinuousOn.prodMk
theorem continuousOn_fst {s : Set (α × β)} : ContinuousOn Prod.fst s :=
continuous_fst.continuousOn
theorem continuousWithinAt_fst {s : Set (α × β)} {p : α × β} : ContinuousWithinAt Prod.fst s p :=
continuous_fst.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.fst {f : α → β × γ} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x).1) s :=
continuous_fst.comp_continuousOn hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.fst {f : α → β × γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => (f x).fst) s a :=
continuousAt_fst.comp_continuousWithinAt h
theorem continuousOn_snd {s : Set (α × β)} : ContinuousOn Prod.snd s :=
continuous_snd.continuousOn
theorem continuousWithinAt_snd {s : Set (α × β)} {p : α × β} : ContinuousWithinAt Prod.snd s p :=
continuous_snd.continuousWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.snd {f : α → β × γ} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x).2) s :=
continuous_snd.comp_continuousOn hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.snd {f : α → β × γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => (f x).snd) s a :=
continuousAt_snd.comp_continuousWithinAt h
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_iff {f : α → β × γ} {s : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.fst ∘ f) s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.snd ∘ f) s x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => h1.prodMk h2⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.prodMap {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α} {y : β}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) :=
.prodMk (hf.comp continuousWithinAt_fst mapsTo_fst_prod)
(hg.comp continuousWithinAt_snd mapsTo_snd_prod)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map := ContinuousWithinAt.prodMap
theorem ContinuousOn.prodMap {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hg : ContinuousOn g t) : ContinuousOn (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) := fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ =>
(hf x hx).prodMap (hg y hy)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias ContinuousOn.prod_map := ContinuousOn.prodMap
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) {b | (x.1, b) ∈ s} x.2 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) {a | (a, x.2) ∈ s} x.1 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, prod_pure,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) x.2 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) x.1 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ a, ContinuousOn (f ⟨a, ·⟩) {b | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left]; rfl
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b, ContinuousOn (f ⟨·, b⟩) {a | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right]; apply forall_swap
/-- If a function `f a b` is such that `y ↦ f a b` is continuous for all `a`, and `a` lives in a
discrete space, then `f` is continuous, and vice versa. -/
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ a, Continuous (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Continuous (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ a, IsOpenMap (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod, map_map]
rfl
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ b, IsOpenMap (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, forall_swap (α := α) (β := β), nhds_prod_eq,
nhds_discrete, prod_pure, map_map]; rfl
/-!
### Pi
-/
theorem continuousWithinAt_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
| {f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => f y i) s x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 1,169 | 1,171 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.